alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2



                        CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of First State Bancorporation,
a New Mexico corporation (the "Company"), for the period ended December 31, 2002
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report), Christopher C. Spencer, as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of his knowledge:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to First State Bancorporation and will be retained by First State
Bancorporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

/s/ Christopher C. Spencer
-------------------------------
Christopher C. Spencer
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer, and
Principal Accounting Officer
March 26, 2003


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
INPUT

.05

80
Consistent with USTR's Section 301 notice, OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. requests

confidential treatment for the information designated as business confidential in this submission. Such

information consists of information that would not customarily be released to the public, including

business or trade secrets regarding production costs and processes, data on sales, product characteristics

customers, destinations, and other product, sales, and cost-related business secrets. Business confidential

information has been indicated herein by enclosing it in single brackets (“[ ]”). A public version of these

comments is also being filed with all confidential information removed.

OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. submits this exclusion request on behalf of our business

unit. OMRON in the US is the only designer of this product and only supplier of this component.

CASE ASSY,MAS is plastic case and is used only automotive window actuator purposes, an

OEM-specified dimension. It is only used for further assembly of components which go into domestic

automobile production, which is specified by auto manufacturer.

This product is not a target of the US Administration's 301 investigation regarding Intellectual Property

concerns. This is not a concern to IP transfer and impressment. This product contains no IP of interest

related to autonomous vehicle production.

The tariff action ultimately poses a risk of significant damage to OMRON, the domestic automobile

industry, and ultimately the US consumer as a increase in price. Like in the case of similar approvals for

vehicle components at the HTS level, OMRON views this product in the same manner. Immediate

movement of production to a US manufacturer or another country would pose significant re-tooling

costs, significant amounts of time, and approvals pertaining to consumer automobile safety standards are

costly and would take a significant amount of time to obtain.

OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. believes that CBP can easily exclude the CASE

ASSY,MAS in question based solely on the product description. The following are draft CBP exclusion

instructions:

"CASE ASSY,MAS for POWER WINDOW SWITCH; flat rectangular assembly with six switches: two

"U" shaped cross-section switch actuators on the bottom row, two "u" shaped cross-section switch

actuators in the middle row, and two toggle switches oriented with the length of the assembly. Made of

plastic case with knob assemblies 4 DR master).Consist: - 1 Plastic case- 4 window(1 Auto/3 Manual)

knobs and 1 door lockout knob with 5 springs and 5 plungers to drive the knob movement;- 1 window

lockout knob assembly consist of 2 plastic plates and 1 plastic window lockout knob- 1 lockout assembly

consists of 1 case, 2 springs, 1 pin and 1 plastic plunger.- 5 plastic light guides for light transmission- 2

screws; Case dimensions 137.1mm x 64mm x37.2 mm Knob (DR A1): 27.34mm x20.08mm x28.26 mm

Knob (M2): 27.53mm x 20.08mm x 28.26mm Knob (D/L L): 28.8mm x 16mm x 35.5mm Knob (W/L):

25.7mm x 20mm x 20.16mm."

This information will be contained on the invoice from the supplier.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification of the Chief Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of WMG Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edgar Bronfman, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated: May 7, 2009
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6964** 

DESI ARNEZ LEWIS , Petitioner

– Appellant ,
v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk
. Raymond A. Jackson , District Judge. ( 2:13

- cv - 00549

- RAJ

- LRL )

Submitted : September 23, 2014 Decided: September 26, 2014

Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Desi Arnez Lewis, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Thomas Judge, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Desi Arnez Lewis seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition as an unauthorized, successive petition or, in the alternative, as untimely
. * The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certi ficate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that re asonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relie f on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85.

* Because the petition was successive and unauthorized, the district court lacked jurisdiction to consider it. 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b) (2012); United States v. Winestock , 340 F.3d 200, 205 (4th Cir. 2003).3 We have independently rev iewed the record and conclude that Lewis has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**EXHIBIT 23.1**
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENTREGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos.333-13773, 333-63967, 333-82323, 333-57362, 333-73562, 333-97265, 333-111000) of our report datedMarch 17, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of PeerlessSystems Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended January 31, 2005.    /s/ Ernst & Young llp   Los Angeles, California
<PAGE>
                                                                     Exhibit 2.1



                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the 
incorporation by reference in this Form 20-F of our Report dated February 24, 
1999, and to the incorporation of our reports included and incorporated by 
reference to this Form 20-F, into the Company's previously filed Registration 
Statements on Form S-8, File Nos. 33-85168, 333-09292 and 333-74321. It 
should be noted that we have not audited any financial statements of the 
Company subsequent to November 30, 1998 or performed any audit procedures 
subsequent to the date of our report.

                                                     ARTHUR ANDERSEN


Glasgow, Scotland
May 11, 1999
Exhibit 32.1

                       CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of GreenWorks
Corporation (the "Company"), certifies that:

1.	The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended
December 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d)); and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



                                  GREENWORKS CORPORATION

                                  By: /S/ JAMES GRAINER
                                  ------------------------------
                                  JAMES GRAINER
                                  Chief Executive Officer and
                                   Chief Financial Officer
Date:   March 31, 2005
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

APPOINTMENT TO MINOR JUDICIARY

EDUCATION BOARD :

:

:

: No. 422

MAGISTERIAL RULES DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 1 st day of May , 2018, Douglas McCall Bell, Esquire, Somerset

County, is hereby designated as a member of the Minor Judiciary Education Board for a

term of three years, commencing July 1, 2018.
#### Antoine HOLMES, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

No. 68119.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Feb. 27, 1996.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 2, 1996.

*283Dave Hemingway, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Maiy Moulton Bryan, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and DOWD, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of BioForce Nanosciences  Holdings,
Inc.  (the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending March 31, 2006, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"), I, Eric Henderson,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  Sec.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to Sec.  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.


/s/   ERIC HENDERSON
-------------------------------
Eric Henderson
Chief Executive Officer
November 9, 2006




     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906, or
     other document  authenticating,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the
     signature that appears in typed form within the electronic  version of this
     written  statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
     the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or its
     staff upon  request.  The foregoing  certifications  are  accompanying  the
     Company's   Form   10-QSB/A   solely   pursuant   to  section  906  of  the
     Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002  (subsections  (a) and  (b) of  section  1350,
     chapter 63 of title 18,  United States Code) and is not being filed as part
     of the Form 10-QSB/A or as a separate disclosure document.


                                      -17-
# 3/JWS" ELECTRONIC RECORD COA # 10-14-00031-CR 

## OFFENSE: Speeding STYLE: RobertScott Shearerv. The State ofTexas COUNTY: Brazos TRIAL COURT: 

### County Court at Law No 2 TRIAL COURT #: 5054-A TRIAL COURTJUDGE: Hon. James W. Locke DISPOSITION: Dismissed 

### DATE: January 15, 2015 

### JUSTICE: Scoggins 

## PUBLISH: ~~ PC S YES DNP: YES 

## Appellant's MOTION FOR REHEARING IS: DENIED 

### DATE: February 19, 2015 JUDGE:

CLK RECORD: RPT RECORD: STATE BR: APPBR: 

### 8/4/2014 SUPPCLKRECORD: SUPPRPTRECORD: SUPP BR: PROSE BR:



### IN THE COURTOF CRIMINALAPPEALS ELECTRONIC RECORD 

# PRO S£ Petition FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: 

# ^F^ft> DATE: dW&t/pO/f JUDGE: fsMlM*-^,

CCAIS:. JUDGE: 

### .MOTION FOR REHEARING IN ON 

### CCA# 

# 11% Disposition: DATE: JUDGE: SIGNED: PUBLISH:
Y OF MAN ON PC: DNP: MOTION FOR STA DATE IS: JUDGE:
Amendment No. 10 to the Employees' Sheltered Savings Plan



 Exhibit 10.40.10 

AMENDMENT NO. 10 

TO THE 

UNIFIED GROCERS, INC. 

SHELTERED SAVINGS PLAN 

Unified Grocers, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby amends the above-named plan (the “Plan”), effective as of
August 31, 1997, as follows: 
 1. Section 3.8(a)(i) of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

 “(i) The amount of Elective Contributions made in any Plan Year on behalf of all Highly Compensated
Employees shall not result in an Actual Deferral Percentage for such Highly Compensated Employees that exceeds the greater of: 

(A) the Actual Deferral Percentage for all Non-Highly Compensated Employees for the current Plan Year, multiplied by 1.25;
or 
 (B) the Actual Deferral Percentage for all Non-Highly Compensated Employees for the current Plan Year,
multiplied by two, provided that the Actual Deferral Percentage for all Highly Compensated Employees does not exceed the Actual Deferral Percentage for all Non-Highly Compensated Employees for the current Plan Year by more than two percentage
points.” 
 2. Sections 3.8(a)(iv) and (v) (and any successors to them) of the Plan are hereby deleted. 

3. Section 3.9(a)(i) of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: 

“(i) The ‘Actual Contribution Percentage’ for eligible Participants in any Plan Year who are all Highly
Compensated Employees shall not exceed the greater of: 
 (A) the Actual Contribution Percentage for all eligible
Participants who are Non-Highly Compensated Employees for the current Plan Year, multiplied by 1.25; or 
 (B)
the Actual Contribution Percentage for all eligible Participants who are Non-Highly Compensated Employees for the current Plan Year, multiplied by two, provided that the Actual Contribution Percentage for all eligible Participants who are Highly
Compensated Employees does not exceed the Actual Contribution Percentage for all Participants who are Non-Highly Compensated Employees for the current Plan Year by more than two percentage points.” 

 

 1 








 4. Sections 3.9(a)(ii) and (iii) (and any successors to them) of the Plan are hereby
deleted. 
 * * * * * 

The Company has caused this Amendment No. 10 to be signed on the date indicated below, to be effective as indicated above.

  

					
		 	“Company”
		
	 	 	UNIFIED GROCERS, INC.
			
	 Dated: May 10, 2010
	 	By:	 	 /s/    ROBERT M. LING,
JR.        

		 	Its:	 	Executive Vice President & General Counsel

  

 2
EX-10.2 Amendment to Purchase & Sale



 





EXHIBIT 10.2




AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE AND SALE




     THIS AMENDMENT (“Amendment”) is made as of the 25th day of September, 2006, by and
between 7007 PALMETTO INVESTMENTS, LLC, a Florida limited liability company (“Seller”) and SPANISH
BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC., a Delaware corporation (“Buyer”) (Buyer and Seller, together, the
“Parties”).



W H E R E A S:




     A. The Parties entered into that certain Agreement for Purchase and Sale, dated as of August
24, 2006 (the “Agreement”) for the real property located at 7007 N.W. 77th Avenue,
Miami, Florida, and a parcel of vacant land adjacent to it, as more fully described in the
Agreement.



     B. The Parties desire to amend the Agreement in certain respects as set forth below.



     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and agreements below, and other good
and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the
Parties hereby further agree as follows:



     1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein in their entirety.



     2. This Amendment shall be deemed a part of, but shall take precedence over and supersede any
provisions to the contrary contained in the Agreement. All initial capitalized terms used in this
Amendment shall have the same meaning as set forth in the Agreement unless otherwise provided.



     3. The Parties agree that the Due Diligence Period is hereby extended for an additional thirty
(30) days and shall expire on Wednesday, October 25, 2006 at 6:00 p.m., Miami, Florida time.



     4. Section 5.5 of the Agreement is hereby modified to provide that to the extent the Buyer
does not elect to terminate the Agreement prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period,
Buyer or its permitted assignee under the Agreement shall, prior to the expiration of the Due
Diligence Period, enter into the Occupancy Agreement to occupy the Property from the expiration of
the Due Diligence Period until Closing.



     5. This Amendment may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an
original, but all constituting only one agreement. Facsimile copies of this Amendment shall be
deemed to have the same force and effect as original hard copies of the same.



 









 





     6. Except as specifically modified hereby, all of the provisions of the Agreement which are
not in conflict with the terms of this Amendment shall remain in full force and effect.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first written
above.



	 	 	 	 	 
	SELLER: 	7007 PALMETTO INVESTMENTS, LLC,

a Florida limited liability company

 	 
	 	By:  	Jose I. Juncadella, P.A., a Florida
 	 
	 	 	professional association, Manager 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Jose I. Juncadella
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Jose I. Juncadella 	 
	 	 	Title:  	President 	 
	 
	BUYER: 	SPANISH BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC., 

a Delaware corporation

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Raul Alarcon 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Raul Alarcon 	 
	 	 	Title:  	President and CEO
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report ofBulldog Financial, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A-1 for the period ended February 28, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Scott McDowell, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated this 7th day of November, 2006.



| | SCOTT MCDOWELL                                     
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Scott McDowell                                     
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



















---
Exhibit 23.2

This consent is a copy of the previously issued Arthur Andersen LLP consent, which has not been reissued since Arthur Andersen LLP has ceased operations. The
prior period financial statements have been revised to retroactively reflect a reverse stock split approved on March 4, 2002 and to include the transitional disclosures required by Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 142,Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,which was adopted by the Company as of November 1, 2001.

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our reports included in this Form 10-K, into the Company's
previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-8, File No. 333-43822.

ARTHUR
ANDERSEN LLP

Salt
Lake City, Utah
January 15, 2001

---

QuickLinks
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5419 

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to clarify the definition 

of employee as it relates to direct sellers and real estate agents, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 12, 2023 

Mr. WALBERG (for himself, Mr. CA ́RDENAS, Mr. MOORE of Utah, and Mr. 

CUELLAR) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to clarify 

the definition of employee as it relates to direct sellers 

and real estate agents, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Direct Seller and Real 

5 Estate Agent Harmonization Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 Section 3(e) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 

8 (29 U.S.C. 203(e)) is amended by inserting after para9 graph (5) the following: 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5419 IH

1 ‘‘(6) The term ‘employee’ does not include any direct 

2 seller or qualified real estate agent (as such terms are de3 fined in section 3508(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 

4 1986).’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB