alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

                      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Danny E. Hosler certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of OC Financial, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of circumstances under which such statements were
     made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material respect
     the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
     registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
     of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting.

Date: February 12, 2007


/s/ Danny E. Hosler
---------------------------------
Danny E. Hosler
Chief Financial Officer
#### 98-30 67th Avenue Owners Corp., Appellant, v Stillorgan Realty Corp. et al., Respondents.

Order, Supreme Court, New York *County*(Beatrice Shainswit, J.), entered May 31, 1989, *inter alia,*denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3212 and granting defendant Stillorgan Realty Corp.’s cross motion for partial summary judgment and for leave to amend its answer, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In this action for breach of contract, plaintiff seeks rescission and return of the deposit money paid towards the purchase of an apartment building located at 98-30 67th Avenue, Forest Hills, New York, from defendant Stillorgan Realty Corp. (Stillorgan). Plaintiff asserts that the defendant was unable to convey title in accordance with the terms of the agreement because six cellar apartments, which were required by the certificate of occupancy to be occupied by commercial tenants, were occupied instead by residential tenants. According to the plaintiff, Stillorgan’s inability to convey title in accordance with the terms of the contract constituted a material breach.

Plaintiff moved for summary judgment. Stillorgan opposed the motion and cross-moved for partial summary judgment on its counterclaim for breach of contract, sought leave to amend its counterclaim for actual damages rather than liquidated damages as originally pleaded, and, in the alternative, sought *415leave to amend its answer to assert a counterclaim for reformation.

Upon review of the record, we find that the IAS court did not err in granting defendant’s cross motion for partial summary judgment. The court determined that the plaintiff had breached the parties’ contract, as a matter of law, in purporting to terminate the agreement one day before the scheduled closing, rather than notifying the defendant of the alleged defect in accordance with the contract’s 10-day notice provision. *(Maxton Bldrs. v Lo Galbo,*68 NY2d 373 [1986].)

Plaintiff’s uncontroverted failure to give timely notice of an alleged defect and subsequent failure to close constituted a default under the contract. Moreover, there is evidence that the plaintiff had notice of the nonconforming residential occupancy prior to execution of the contract of sale. Concur— Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Rosenberger, Kassal and Smith, JJ.
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 84 (Tuesday, April 30, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19077-19078]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10571]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Health Care Financing Administration

Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; 
Comment Request

AGENCY: Health Care Financing Administration, HHS.
    In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et 
seq.), this notice is publishing the following summaries of proposed 
collections for public comment. The title, description, and respondent 
description of the information collection are shown below with an 
estimate of the annual reporting and recordkeeping burden. Included in 
the estimate is the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing 
data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing 
and reviewing the collection of information. Interested persons are 
invited to send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other 
aspect of this collection of information, including any of the 
following subjects: (1) The necessity and utility of the proposed

[[Page 19078]]

information collection for the proper performance of the agency's 
functions; (2) the accuracy of the estimated burden; (3) ways to 
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be 
collected; and (4) the use of automated collection techniques or other 
forms of information technology to minimize the information collection 
burden.
    1. Type of Information Collection Request: New; Title of 
Information Collection: National Payer Identifier (PAYER-ID); Form No.: 
HCFA-856; Use: The PAYER-ID will allow payers of health care claims to 
be identified by a unique numeric identifier. PAYER-ID numbers will be 
assigned, but not limited to the following groups: Medicare, Medicaid, 
VA, public health service, large employers and unions, HMOs, large 
insurers, etc.; Frequency: One time (Reporting); Affected Public: 
Business or other for profit, Not for profit institutions, Federal 
Government, State, local or tribal government; Number of Respondents: 
85,000; Total Annual Responses: 8,500; Total Annual Hours Requested 
85,000.
    To request copies of the proposed paperwork collection referenced 
above, call the Reports Clearance Office on (410) 786-1326. Written 
comments and recommendations for the proposed information collections 
should be sent within 60 days of this notice directly to the HCFA 
Paperwork Clearance Officer designated at the following address: HCFA, 
Office of Financial and Human Resources, Management Planning and 
Analysis Staff, Attention: Zaneta Davis, 7500 Security Boulevard, Room 
C2-26-17, Baltimore, Maryland 21244-1850.

    Dated: April 22, 1996.
Kathleen B. Larson,
Director, Management Planning and Analysis Staff.
[FR Doc. 96-10571 Filed 4-29-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-03-P
```
EXHIBIT 99.2




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SS 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Sun Asset Holdings,  Inc. on Form 10-KSB
for the period  ending  December  31,  2002,  as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles C. Frey, Chief
Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  SS 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



 /s/  Charles C. Frey
Charles C. Frey
Chief Financial Officer
April 10, 2003
#### Steven BREWER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 63115.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.

Aug. 31, 1993.

Lew A. Kollias, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Elizabeth L. Ziegler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before GARY M. GAERTNER, C.J., and PUDLOWSKI and SIMON, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Steven Brewer, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the motion court’s order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties here involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-14-00201-CR

JOANNA MARTINEZ GONZALEZ

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the

107th District Court of Cameron County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2012-DCR-2626-A

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

April 14, 2016
**Exhibit 12.1**

 

----

I, Jeremy P. Scudamore, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Avecia Group plc;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of this annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

| Date:  May 14, 2004 | By: ______________________ |
|---------------------|----------------------------|
|                |                       | Jeremy P. Scudamore |
|                |                       | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
October 16, 2015

**RE:**Case Number:  07-15-00205-CR, 07-15-00206-CR, 07-15-00207-CR

Trial Court Case Number: 141066, 141094, 141118

**Style:**Daniel Lee Ainsworth v. The State of Texas

Dear Counsel:F

State's brief is filed on Monday, October 12, 2015.

Very truly yours,

**Vivian Long**

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Joseph L. JANOSKI, Defendant/Appellant.

No. 61845.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Dec. 15, 1992.

Claude Hanks, Chesterfield, for defendant/ appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Robert Alan Kelly, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff/respondent.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction and sentence for stealing property with a value of at least $150, § 570.080, RSMo 1986. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no prece-dential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
<PAGE>




Exhibit 32

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                     AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

         In connection with the Report of Nascent Wine Company, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
we, Sandro Piancone, Chief Executive Officer and William Lindberg, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Sandro Piancone
-------------------------------------
Sandro Piancone
Chief Executive Officer
May 11, 2007

/s/ William Lindberg
-------------------------------------
William Lindberg
Chief Financial Officer
May 11, 2007
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Export-Import Bank

# TIME AND DATE: 

Thursday, June 17th, 2021 from 2:00-4:30 p.m. EDT.

# PLACE: 

The meeting will be held virtually.

# STATUS: 

*Public Participation:*                         The meeting will be open to public participation and time will be allotted for questions or comments submitted online. Members of the public may also file written statements before or after the meeting to                         *external@exim.gov.*                         Interested parties may register for the meeting at                         *https://app.smartsheet.com/​b/​form/​42af9759b5594205b9d9dc3ae754afae*.                    

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Discussion of EXIM policies and programs to provide competitive financing to expand United States exports and comments for inclusion in EXIM's Report to the U.S. Congress on Global Export Credit Competition.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

For further information, contact India Walker, External Enagagement Specialist, at 202-480-0062.

Joyce B. Stone,

Assistant Corporate Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2021-11717 Filed 5-28-21; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of U.S. Helicopter Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, John G. Murphy, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: November 19, 2007


                                        /S/ JOHN G. MURPHY
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        John G. Murphy
                                        Chief Executive Officer and President
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 80 (Wednesday, April 24, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18131-18132]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10030]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP96-320-000]


Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Request Under 
Blanket Authorization

April 18, 1996.
    Take notice that on April 15, 1996, Columbia Gas Transmission 
Corporation (Columbia), P.O. Box 1273, Charleston, West Virginia, 
25325-1273, filed in Docket No. CP96-320-000 a request pursuant to 
Sections 157.205, and 157.216(b) of the Commission's Regulations under 
the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205 and 157.216) for approval to 
abandon in place approximately 0.7 mile of its 20-inch transmission 
line, Line KA, and five points of delivery to Mountaineer Gas Company 
(Mountaineer) for service to mainline customers, under the blanket 
certificate issued in Docket No. CP83-76-000, pursuant to Section 7(c) 
of the Natural Gas Act (NGA), all as more fully set forth in the 
request which is on file with the Commission and open to public 
inspection.
    Columbia States that the facilities for which it seeks abandonment 
were

[[Page 18132]]

transferred to low pressure service in order to maintain service to 
five mainline tap customers in Docket No. CP95-240-000. Columbia 
indicates that the transfer was necessary due to the relocation of a 
pipeline corridor in deteriorating Line KA. It is indicated that the 
proposed abandonment will not result in any loss of service to any 
customer because they are currently being provided service by Wyoming 
Natural Gas, a local distribution company. It is further indicated that 
Mountaineer and the customers agree to the proposed abandonment.
    Any person or the Commission's Staff may, within 45 days of the 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.214), a motion to intervene and pursuant to Section 157.205 of the 
regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205),a protest to the 
request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefore, the 
proposed activities shall be deemed to be authorized effective the day 
after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed and 
not withdrawn 30 days after the time allowed for filing a protest, the 
instant request shall be treated as an application for authorization 
pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-10030 Filed 4-23-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6976

Crown Equipment Corporation:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel