alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 80 (Wednesday, April 24, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18161-18162]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10069]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Pension and Welfare Benefit Administration


Working Group on Protections for Benefit Plan Participants; 
Advisory Council on Employee Welfare and Pension Benefits Plans; Notice 
of Meeting

    Pursuant to the authority contained in Section 512 of the Employee 
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. 1142, a 
public meeting of the Working Group on Protections for Benefit Plan 
Participants of the Advisory Council on Employee Welfare and Pension 
Benefit Plans will be held on May 7, 1996, in Room N3437 B&C, U.S. 
Department of Labor Building, Third and Constitution Avenue, N.W., 
Washington, DC 20210.
    The purpose of the meeting, which will begin at 1 p.m. and end at 
approximately 3:30 p.m., is to study the extent to which third-party 
trustees can provide protections for benefit plan participants.
    Members of the public are encouraged to file a written statement 
pertaining to any topic concerning ERISA by submitting 20 copies on or 
before April 26, 1996 to Sharon Morrissey, Acting Executive Secretary, 
ERISA Advisory Council, U.S. Department of Labor, Suite N-5677, 200 
Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20210. Individuals or 
representatives of organizations wishing to address the Working Group 
on Protections for Benefit Plan Participants of the Advisory Council 
should forward their request to the Acting Executive Secretary or 
telephone (202) 219-8753. Oral presentations will be limited to ten 
minutes, but an extended statement may be submitted for the record. 
Individuals with disabilities, who need special accommodations, should 
contact Sharon

[[Page 18162]]

Morrissey by April 26 at the address indicated in the notice.
    Organizations or individuals may also submit statements for the 
record without testifying. Twenty (20) copies of such statements should 
be sent to the Acting Executive Secretary of the Advisory Council at 
the above address. Papers will be accepted and included in the record 
of the meeting if received on or before April 26, 1996.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 18th day of April, 1996.
Olena Berg,
Assistant Secretary, Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration.
[FR Doc. 96-10069 Filed 4-23-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-29-M
| 1) |   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2) |   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                       |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|  By:      /s/ David C. Stuebe                         |   |
|        David C. Stuebe                                |   |   |
| Vice      President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer |   |   |
| (Principal      Financial Officer)                         |   |   |
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Bill BACHMAN, Appellant.

No. WD 46131.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

April 20, 1993.

Gary E. Brotherton, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before SMART, P.J., and SHANGLER and FENNER, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Bill Bachman appeals from a judgment finding him guilty of two counts of sodomy in violation of § 566.060, RSMo 1986 following a jury trial on March 31, 1992. Bachman was Sentenced to two consecutive fifteen year terms of imprisonment.

Judgment is affirmed.
#### Gunn *v.*Johnson & Company.

Atkinson, J.

1. The statutory provision that the judges of the county courts in this State shall have jurisdiction to “ foreclose mortgages on personal property and liens” (Park’s Civil Code, § 4775 (mm); Ga. Raws, 1871-2, p 292) includes power of the judge to take the statutory affidavit and issue execution as provided in the Civil Code (1910), § 3366.

2. The authority conferred by section four of the act creating the city court of Millen (Acts 1912, p. 245), upon the judge of that court, “ to do all acts which the judges of the county courts of this State are authorized to do, unless otherwise provided in this act,” includes jurisdiction of the judge to take statutory affidavits and issue executions thereon in the foreclosure of liens on personalty as provided in the Civil Code (1910), § 3366.

*(а)*The provision in section nineteen of the act creating the city court of Millen, that “ all executions issuing from said court shall be attested in the name of the judge and signed by the clerk,” refers to executions issued upon judgments rendered in the court, and does not limit the power of the judge to issue executions on affidavits for foreclosure of liens on personalty.

(б) Section nineteen of the act creating the city court of Millen, supra, is as follows: “ All judgments obtained in said court shall be a lien on all property of the defendant, or defendants, throughout the State, in the same manner as judgments of the superior courts are; but property exempt from levy and sale under the laws of this State shall be exempt from levy and sale under process from said court, and all executions issuing from said court shall be attested in the name of the judge and signed by the clerk and directed to the sheriff of the city court of Millen, or his deputies, and to all and singular the sheriffs .or their deputies of the State of Georgia.”

3. It follows from the rulings announced in the preceding notes, that the judge of the city court of Millen has power, in the foreclosure of liens upon personalty, to take the statutory affidavits, and on the basis pf such affidavits to issue executions under the orovisions of the *569statute relating to foreclosure of sucli liens, and that in a given case an execution so issued is not void on the ground th^t it was issued by the judge and not by the clerk of the city court of Millen.

No. 3115.

November 24, 1922.

The Court of Appeals certified (in Case No. 12256) certain questions, the answers to which appear in the headnotes.

*Willie Woodrum,*for plaintiff in error.

*A. 8. Anderson,*contra.

*All the Justices concur.*
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7573

Byson Electronics US, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
exv4w42





Exhibit 4.42



Execution Copy




LETTER AMENDMENT




September 23, 2009




SINA CORPORATION

20/F Beijing Ideal International Plaza

No. 58 Northwest 4th Ring Road

Haidian District, Beijing, 100080

People’s Republic of China




Attention: Chair of the Audit Committee




Dear Mr. Tsao:




               Reference is made to (i) the Share Subscription Agreement, dated as of
September 22, 2009 (the “Subscription Agreement”) between SINA CORPORATION,
a Cayman Islands corporation (the “Company”), and NEW-WAVE INVESTMENT
HOLDING COMPANY LIMITED, a British Virgin Islands corporation (the
“Purchaser”), and (ii) the Registration Rights Agreement (the
“Registration Rights Agreement”, together with the Subscription Agreement,
the
“Transaction Agreements”), dated as of September 22, 2009, between the Company and the
Purchaser.



               Pursuant to and in accordance with Section 8.08 of the Subscription Agreement
and Section 12(c)(i) of the Registration Rights Agreement, the Purchaser and the
Company hereby agree that the Transaction Agreements are amended as follows:



               All references to “September 22, 2009” in the Transaction Agreements shall be
deleted in its entirety and be replaced with “September 21, 2009.”



               Except as specifically set forth above, the terms and conditions of the
Transaction Agreements shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect, and are
hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects.



               This letter amendment shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with,
the laws of the State of New York.



               This letter amendment may be executed in several counterparts, each of which
shall be deemed an original, but such counterparts shall together constitute but
one and the same instrument. This letter amendment may be executed and delivered in
counterpart signature pages executed and delivered via electronic or facsimile
transmission, and any such counterpart executed and delivered via electronic or
facsimile transmission shall be deemed an original for all intents and purposes.



 









 





	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Very truly yours,





NEW-WAVE INVESTMENT HOLDING

COMPANY LIMITED

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Charles Chao
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	CHARLES CHAO 	 
	 	 	Title:  	SOLE DIRECTOR 	 
	 



	 	 	 	 	 
	This letter amendment is hereby agreed and

accepted as of the date first set forth above by:



SINA CORPORATION

 	 	 
	By:  	/s/
Ter-Fung Tsao 	 	 
	 	Name:  	Ter-Fung Tsao 	 	 
	 	Title:  	Director
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 6959

WALLACE GAITHER , Plaintiff

- Appellant , and CHARLES EVERETTE HINTON; ALLEN J. BUTTKE; STANLEY M. DRAUGHON; WALTER KEVIN JOHNSON , Plaintiffs,

v. ROY COOPER; ERIK A. HOOKS; MICHAEL HARDEE , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Richard Ernest Myers , II, District Judge. ( 5:20

- ct

- 03153

- M )

Submitted : September 24, 2020 Decided: September 29, 2020

Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.2 Wallace Gaither , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not bindin g precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: Wallace Gaither appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint without prejudice for failure to prosecute or comply with court orders. On appeal, we confine our
review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Becau se Gaither’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, he has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey , 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document ; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”) . Accordingly, we deny Gaither’s motion for a transcript at the government’s expense and affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report of WMG Acquisition Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Edgar Bronfman, Jr., Chief
Executive Officer of WMG Acquisition Corp., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: August 11, 2005



/s/    EDGAR BRONFMAN,
JR.Edgar Bronfman, Jr.Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Silver River Ventures,  Inc.(the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  September  30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Geoff Williams, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.



/s/ Geoff Williams
-------------------------------------
Geoff Williams
Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2005


     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906, or
     other document  authenticating,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the
     signature that appears in typed form within the electronic  version of this
     written  statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
     the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or its
     staff upon  request.  The foregoing  certifications  are  accompanying  the
     Company's Form 10-QSB solely pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
     Act of 2002  (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of title
     18,  United  States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB
     or as a separate disclosure document.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and accompanies the annual
report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the "Form 10-K") of
Dearborn Bancorp, Inc. (the "Issuer").

         I, Michael J. Ross, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Issuer, certify that:

         (i)      The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
                  (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

         (ii)     The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Issuer.

Dated: March 25, 2004

                                                /s/ Michael J. Ross
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                     Michael J. Ross
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer,
                                                  Dearborn Bancorp, Inc.
exv10w3



 





Exhibit 10.3



On August 28, 2006 the Company and Shailesh M. Kotwal entered into a Transition Assistance
Agreement that is substantially identical to the Agreement with Clyde L. Thomas filed as Exhibit
10.34 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 4 307

_____________________________ S TEPHEN M ILTON , Former Husband,

Appellant,

v.

J ULIANNA M ILTON , Former Wife,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Daniel F. Wilensky , Judge

. August 16, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , O STERHAUS , and K ELSEY , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________ Patricia L. Parker of the Law Offices of Patricia L. Parker , P.A., Jacksonville
, for Appellant.

Matthew L. Rhodes, Callahan
, for Appellee.
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 84 (Tuesday, April 30, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 19095]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10624]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards Subcommittee Meeting on 
Plant Operations; Notice of Meeting

    The ACRS Subcommittee on Plant Operations will hold a meeting on 
May 21, 1996, Room T-2B3, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland.
    The meeting will be open to public attendance.
    The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows:

Tuesday, May 21, 1996--8:30 a.m. Until the Conclusion of Business

    The Subcommittee will discuss the proposed Rule on Shutdown 
Operations and an associated Regulatory Guide as well as studies on 
shutdown risk at Surry and Grand Gulf nuclear plants. The purpose of 
this meeting is to gather information, analyze relevant issues and 
facts, and to formulate proposed positions and actions, as appropriate, 
for deliberation by the full Committee.
    Oral statements may be presented by members of the public with the 
concurrence of the Subcommittee Chairman; written statements will be 
accepted and made available to the Committee. Electronic recordings 
will be permitted only during those portions of the meeting that are 
open to the public, and questions may be asked only by members of the 
Subcommittee, its consultants, and staff. Persons desiring to make oral 
statements should notify the cognizant ACRS staff engineers named below 
five days prior to the meeting, if possible, so that appropriate 
arrangements can be made.
    During the initial portion of the meeting, the Subcommittee, along 
with any of its consultants who may be present, may exchange 
preliminary views regarding matters to be considered during the balance 
of the meeting.
    The Subcommittee will then hear presentations by and hold 
discussions with representatives of the NRC staff, its consultants, and 
other interested persons regarding this review.
    Further information regarding topics to be discussed, whether the 
meeting has been cancelled or rescheduled, the Chairman's ruling on 
requests for the opportunity to present oral statements and the time 
allotted therefor can be obtained by contacting the cognizant ACRS 
staff engineers, Mr. Michael T. Markley (telephone 301/415-6885) or Mr. 
Amarjit Singh (telephone 301/415-6899) between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. 
(EDT). Persons planning to attend this meeting are urged to contact the 
above named individuals one or two working days prior to the meeting to 
be advised of any potential changes to the agenda, etc., that may have 
occurred.

    Dated: April 24, 1996.
Sam Duraiswamy,
Chief, Nuclear Reactors Branch.
[FR Doc. 96-10624 Filed 4-29-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, June 11, 2021, 02:30 p.m. to June 11, 2021, 06:00 p.m., National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on May 18, 2021, 86 FR 26928.                

The CSR Special Emphasis Panel; RFA-RM-20-017: Harnessing Data Science for Health Discovery and Innovation in Africa—Ethical, Legal and Social Implications Research meeting is being amended to change the end time from 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: May 26, 2021.

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-11520 Filed 6-1-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P