alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-7288

Nissan North America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MARCUS M. WALTON,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 99 EM 2020

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 9th day of March , 2021, the Application for Leave to File Original

Process is GRANTED, and the Application for Extraordinary Relief is DENIED.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7351

FS-Elliott Co., LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_5-30-2019.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 80 (Wednesday, April 24, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 18146]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10166]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Sunshine Act Meeting



Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

Time and Date: 11:00 a.m., Monday, April 29, 1996.
Place: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, C Street 
entrance between 20th and 21st Streets, NW., Washington, D.C. 20551.

Status: Closed.


Matters to be Considered:


    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal 
Reserve System employees.
    2. Any items carried forward from a previously announced 
meeting.

Contact Person for More Information: Mr. Joseph R. Coyne, Assistant to 
the Board; (202) 452-3204. You may call (202) 452-3207, beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before this meeting, for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting.

    Dated: April 19, 1996.
Jennifer J. Johnson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 96-10166 Filed 4-22-96; 10:05 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Raphael HICKS, Appellant. Raphael HICKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 68176.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Dec. 3, 1996.

Frank A. Anzalone, Anzalone & Fiser, Clayton, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jill C. LaHue, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Raphael Hicks (“defendant”), appeals the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of the County of St. Louis after a jury *83found him guilty of unlawful use of a weapon, RSMo § 570.030.1. Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the claims of trial error are without merit. We further find the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the trial and motion courts pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


Subsidiaries of the Registrant.

        MedicalControl Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation

        MedicalControl Network Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation and
        wholly owned subsidiary of MedicalControl Holdings, Inc.

        PPO Management Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned
        subsidiary of MedicalControl Holdings, Inc.

        Genesis/ValueCheck, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned
        subsidiary of MedicalControl Holdings, Inc.

        Diversified Group Administrators, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation and
        wholly owned subsidiary of MedicalControl Holdings, Inc.

        Diversified Group Insurance Agency of PA, Inc., a Pennsylvania
        corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of Diversified Group
        Administrators, Inc.
exv10w2









Exhibit 10.2




FIRST AMENDMENT OF

PROLOGIS 1997 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN




     WHEREAS, ProLogis maintains the ProLogis 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “1997 Plan”); and



     WHEREAS, amendment of the 1997 Plan is now considered desirable;



     NOW, THEREFORE, the 1997 Plan is hereby amended by adding the following new Section 9 to the
1997 Plan immediately following Section 8 thereof, all effective as of the date on which the
shareholders of ProLogis approve the amendment to the 1997 Plan:



“SECTION 9



SHARE OPTION EXCHANGE



Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary, upon approval of the Trust’s
shareholders in accordance with the terms of the Plan, the Board or the Compensation Committee of
the Board may provide for, and the Trust may implement, a one-time-only share option exchange
offer, pursuant to which certain outstanding share options (whether granted under the Plan or
another plan of the Trust) could, at the election of the person holding such share option, be
tendered to the Trust for cancellation in exchange for the issuance of a Full Value Award under the
ProLogis 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the ‘2006 Plan’) consisting of a lesser amount of
restricted share units, Options (as defined in the 2006 Plan) or cash payments, provided that such
one-time-only share option exchange offer is commenced within 12 months of the date of such
shareholder approval. Options that are exchanged will not be added back to the authorized reserve
under the Plan or the 2006 Plan.”
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4751

Horizon Hobby LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_05.09.19.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
Exhibit 10.8


LOAN AGREEMENT


(English Translation)







THIS LOAN AGREEMENT, is made this thirty-first day of December, 2009, by and among Harbin Tianmu Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., a Chinese corporation (hereinafter knows as “BORROWER”) and Harbin Tianmu Real Estate Development Co., Ltd. a Chinese corporation (hereinafter knows as “LENDER”). BORROWER and LENDER shall collectively be known herein as “the Parties”. In determining the rights and duties of the Parties under this Loan Agreement, the entire document must be read as a whole.


 


In order to define the rights and obligations of the Borrowers and the Lender under relevant loan arrangements, the Parties hereby agree as follows:


 


Article 1 Amount and Interest Rate of Loan


 


1.1 Subject to the terms and conditions herein, the Lender agrees to provide the Borrowers with a loan with the principal of RMB 2,070,947.10


 


1.2 The interest rate of the Loan hereunder is 7% per year.


 


Article 2 Use and Term of Loan


 



	
2.1

	
The term of the Loan hereunder shall be five(5) years, counted from the day when the Loan is provided.







 



	
2.2

	
The loan should be used for the company’s working capital.







 


Article 3 Repayment


 


3. The borrower should pay the Debt in full at the maturity date.


 


Article 4 Defaulting Liabilities


 


3.1 The Borrowers undertake to hold the Lender harmless and indemnify the Lender against any actions, charges, claims, costs, damages, demands, expenses, liabilities, losses and proceedings which the Lender may suffer or be subject to as a result of any default by the Borrowers of its obligations hereunder.


 


3.2 Notwithstanding any other provisions herein, the validity of this Article shall survive the suspension or termination of this Agreement.


 




  





  











  











This agreement is made out in two originals, one for each party .Both of them have the same force and effect.







(Signature page)


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Loan Agreement to be executed as of the date and in the place first set forth above.


 


Harbin Tianmu Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd


 


By: Corporate seal


 


Harbin Tianmu Real Estate Development Co., Ltd.


 


By: Corporate seal
#### In the Interest of C.M.C., Respondent, v. _, Appellant.

No. 65348.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Nov. 22, 1994.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 3, 1995.

Thea A. Sherry, Catalona & Sherry, Clayton, for appellant.

Cynthia Harcourt-Hearring, William P. Grant, Margulis & Grant, Clayton, for respondent.

René E. Lusser, St. Louis, Guardian ad Litem.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER, and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Mother appeals from the decision of the Juvenile Court of St. Louis County adopting the Juvenile Court Commissioner’s order finding that a four-year-old juvenile came within the provisions of § 211.031(1), RSMo Supp.1993, and awarding custody of the juvenile to father. We affirm. The judgment of the Juvenile Court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 76 (Thursday, April 20, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 19760]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9788]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[AA-310-1310]


Information Collection Submitted to the Office of Management and 
Budget for Review under the Paperwork Reduction Act

    The proposal for the collection of information listed below has 
been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget for approval 
under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 
35). Copies of the proposed collection of information and related forms 
and explanatory material may be obtained by contacting the Bureau's 
Clearance Officer at the phone number listed below. Comments and 
suggestions on the requirement should be made directly to the Bureau 
Clearance Officer and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork 
Reduction Project (1004-0160), Washington, DC 20503, telephone (202) 
395-7340.
    Title: Geothermal Leasing Reports.
    OMB Approval Number: 1004-0160.
    Abstract: Respondents supply information on diligent efforts toward 
utilization of geothermal resources; bona fide efforts made to produce 
geothermal resources; and significant expenditure of funds made on the 
geothermal lease. This information allows the authorized officer to 
determine if the lessee qualifies for a lease extension.
    Bureau Form Numbers: N/A.
    Frequency: Diligent Efforts Report--Yearly. Bona Fide Efforts 
Report--Every five years. Significant Expenditures Report--Yearly.
    Description of Respondents: Individuals, small businesses and large 
corporations.
    Estimated Completion Time: 2 hours each report.
    Annual Responses: 75.
    Annual Burden Hours: 150.
    Bureau Clearance Officer: Wendy Spencer (303) 236-6642.

    Dated: March 15, 1995.
W. Hord Tipton,
Assistant Director, Resource Use and Protection.
[FR Doc. 95-9788 Filed 4-19-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-84-M
Order entered July 16, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00329-CR

EARNEST DEWAYNE CLAYTON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

Rockwall County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CR17-2027

ORDER

Appellant was convicted on April 20, 2021 and filed his notice of appeal on 

May 3, 2021. The appellate record was due on June 19, 2021. Although the clerk’s 

record was filed, the reporter’s record has not been filed. Court reporter Deborah 

Hamon informed the Court by letter dated June 18, 2021 that appellant is not 

indigent and no arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record have been made. On 

June 21, 2021, we notified appellant and instructed him to provide written 

verification that he had paid or made arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record
within ten days of the date of the letter. We cautioned appellant that the failure to 

do so would result in the appeal being submitted without a reporter’s record. To 

date, appellant has not complied with the Court’s instructions, and he has failed to 

otherwise communicate with the Court regarding the appeal.

Therefore, we ORDER this appeal submitted without a reporter’s record.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c). Appellant’s brief is due by August 16, 2021.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       2,491,460
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       1,199,210
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               940,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 31,246,921
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      15,570,500
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        15,516,823
<LOANS>                                    137,526,437
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,833,615
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             194,666,639
<DEPOSITS>                                 167,293,781
<SHORT-TERM>                                 8,184,933
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,764,709
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       367,782
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,055,434
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             194,666,639
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             11,251,457
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            2,258,979
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               371,375
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            13,881,811
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           5,858,100
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,053,731
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        7,828,080
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  503,750
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              4,860,115
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,247,405
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   3,247,405
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,177,147
<EPS-BASIC>                                     2.97
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.97
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.31
<LOANS-NON>                                  1,057,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   832,255
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               614,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,681,735
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  383,403
<RECOVERIES>                                    31,533
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,833,615
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,789,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         45,000


</TABLE>
ex-10_1.htm










FedFirst Financial Corporation 10-Q












EXHIBIT 10.1












AMENDMENT TO THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN


ROBERT C. BARRY, JR.,


FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK AND FEDFIRST FINANCIAL CORPORATION












WHEREAS, Robert C. Barry, Jr. (the “Executive”) entered into an employment agreement with First Federal Savings Bank (the “Bank”) and FedFirst Financial Corporation (the “Company”) effective March 31, 2006 (the “Employment Agreement”); and







WHEREAS , the Board of Directors of the Bank has resolved to amend the Employment Agreement effective April 1, 2010, to reflect an adjustment in the Executive’s annual base salary; and







WHEREAS, the Employment Agreement was further amended to provide that modifications to Executive’s base salary in the future will not require an amendment to the Employment Agreement.







NOW, THEREFORE, the Bank, the Company and the Executive hereby consent to the following:







Effective April 1, 2010, Section 4(a) of the Employment Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following new Section 4(a):







“The Bank agrees to pay the executive an annual salary of $167,500, payable in accordance with the customary payroll practices of the Bank.   The Executive’s annual salary, as the same may be modified from time to time, is referred to in this Agreement as the “base salary.””













	
ATTEST:

	 	  	
FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK

	 
	  	 	  	  	 
	
/s/ DaCosta Smith III

	 	  	
/s/ John J. LaCarte

	 
	
DaCosta Smith III

	 	  	
John J. LaCarte

	 
	  	 	  	  	 
	
ATTEST:

	 	  	
FEDFIRST FINANCIAL CORPORATION

	 
	  	 	  	  	 
	
/s/ DaCosta Smith III

	 	  	
/s/ John J. LaCarte

	 
	
DaCosta Smith III

	 	  	
John J. LaCarte

	 
	  	 	  	  	 
	
ATTEST:

	 	  	  	 
	  	 	  	  	 
	
/s/ DaCosta Smith III

	 	  	
/s/ Robert C. Barry, Jr.

	 
	
DaCosta Smith III

	 	  	
Robert C. Barry, Jr.