alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification of the Chief Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of WMG Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period endedMarch 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edgar Bronfman, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated: May 6,2010
----

|                                                                    |   | Three Months Ended |       |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------|------------|
|                                                                    |   | June 30, 2010      |       |   | June 30, 2009 |   |
|                                                                    |   | (Restated)         |       |   |   |   |
| Net income                                                              |   | $                  | (11,134    | ) |   | $ | 1,739 |   |
| Weighted average common shares outstanding for computation of basic EPS |   |               | 12,631,821 |   |   |   | 12,608,619 |   |
| Dilutive common-equivalent shares                                       |   |               | --         |   |   |   | 2,129 |   |
| Weighted average common shares for computation of diluted EPS           |   |               | 12,631,821 |   |   |   | 12,610,748 |   |
|                                                                    |   |               |       |   |   |   |   |   |
| Earnings per common share:                                              |   |               |       |   |   |   |   |   |
| Basic                                                                   |   | $                  | (0.88      | ) |   | $ | 0.14 |   |
| Diluted                                                                 |   | $                  | (0.88      | ) |   | $ | 0.14 |   |
|                                                                    |   |               |       |   |   |   |   |   |
|                                                                    |   | Nine Months Ended  |       |
|                                                                    |   | June 30, 2010      |       |   | June 30, 2009 |   |
|                                                                    |   | (restated)         |       |   |   |   |   |
| Net income                                                              |   | $                  | (22,172    | ) |   | $ | 4,163 |   |
| Weighted average common shares outstanding for computation of basic EPS |   |               | 12,623,577 |   |   |   | 12,648,701 |   |
| Dilutive common-equivalent shares                                       |   |               | --         |   |   |   | 4,441 |   |
| Weighted average common shares for computation of diluted EPS           |   |               | 12,623,577 |   |   |   | 12,653,142 |   |
|                                                                    |   |               |       |   |   |   |   |   |
| Earnings per common share:                                              |   |               |       |   |   |   |   |   |
| Basic                                                                   |   | $                  | (1.76      | ) |   | $ | 0.33 |   |
| Diluted                                                                 |   | $                  | (1.76      | ) |   | $ | 0.33 |   |
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6958

Jet, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests. 

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
#### Bobby STONE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 52199.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

June 18, 1996.

Gary E. Brotherton, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., David R. Truman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before LOWENSTEIN, P.J., and HANNA and SPINDEN, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Bobby Stone appeals the circuit court’s denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his motion to set aside his guilty plea to one count of rape and to two counts of forcible sodomy. He asserts that the circuit court erred in denying an evidentiary hearing. We disagree and affirm the denial. Rule 84.16(b).
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-84,221-02

EX PARTE KEVIN SCOTT, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 18616B IN THE 104 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM TAYLOR COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of assault-family

violence and sentenced to eight years’ imprisonment. The Eleventh Court of Appeals affirmed his

conviction. Scott v. State, No. 11-14-00131-CR (Tex. App.—Eastland, Aug. 6, 2015).

Applicant contends, among other things, that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective

assistance because counsel failed to advise him of his right to file petition for discretionary review

pro se.

Appellate counsel filed an affidavit with the trial court. Based on that affidavit, the trial court
2

has entered findings of fact and conclusions of law that appellate counsel failed to advise him of his

right to petition for discretionary review pro se. The trial court recommends that relief be granted. 

Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). We find, therefore, that Applicant is

entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discretionary review of the judgment of

the Eleventh Court of Appeals in Cause No. 11-14-00131-CR that affirmed his conviction in Case

No. 18616-B from the 104 District Court of Taylor County, Texas. Applicant shall file his petition th

for discretionary review with this Court within 30 days of the date on which this Court’s mandate

issues.

Applicant’s remaining claims are dismissed. Ex Parte Torres, 943 S.W.2d 469 (Tex. Crim.

App. 1997).

Delivered: July 26, 2017

Do not publish
#### Milton F. NITSCH and Verna Lee Nitsch, Plaintiffs/Respondents, v. ASHLAND LAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, et al., Defendant/Appellant.

No. 69305.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District.

Nov. 19, 1996.

David G. Beeson, Mary Eftink Boner, Buerkle, Beeson, Ludwig, Wilson & Jackson, Jackson, for defendant/appellant.

Albert C. Lowes, Lowes & Drusch, Cape Girardeau, for plaintiffs/respondents.

Before AHRENS, C.J., and DOWD and RHODES RUSSELL, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

This is a dispute over the ownership of a 1.189 acre parcel of land located in Jackson, Missouri. Plaintiffs, Milton and Verna Nitseh, sought an order vesting them with title by adverse possession to a tract of land which runs along a creek on the eastern border of the Nitsches’ land. The Nitsches further sought a judgment for trespass against defendant, Ashland Land Development. The trial court found that the Nitsch-es acquired the property through adverse possession and rendered judgment in favor of the Nitsches. Ashland appeals.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                     
|----------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

I, Darren R. Stevenson, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Uniontown Energy
      Inc. for the period ended April 30, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Uniontown Energy Inc.                                                                 

Dated: June 17, 2011

| | /s/ Darren R. Stevenson                        
| | -----------------------------------------------
| | Darren R. Stevenson                            
| | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
| | (Principal Executive Officer)                  
| | UNIONTOWN ENERGY INC.                          

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Uniontown Energy
Inc. and will be retained by Uniontown Energy Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5549 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5549

  To require the Secretary of the Treasury to submit to the Congress 
  completed proposals for the termination of the conservatorships of 
          Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 18, 2023

  Mr. Ogles introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the Secretary of the Treasury to submit to the Congress 
  completed proposals for the termination of the conservatorships of 
          Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``End of GSE Conservatorship 
Preparation Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. PROPOSALS FOR TERMINATION OF CONSERVATORSHIPS.

    (a) Report.--Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary of the Treasury shall submit a report to the 
Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate that 
identifies whether--
            (1) the Department of the Treasury completed the proposal 
        described in article IX of the Letter Agreement to the Amended 
        and Restated Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement between the 
        United States Department of the Treasury and the Federal 
        National Mortgage Association, dated January 14, 2021, and the 
        proposal described in article IX of the Letter Agreement to the 
        Amended and Restated Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement between 
        the United States Department of the Treasury and the Federal 
        Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, dated January 14, 2021; and
            (2) either or both of such proposals were completed and, if 
        so, includes such completed proposal or proposals.
    (b) Proposals.--If the report required under subsection (a) 
indicates that either or both of such proposals were not completed, the 
Secretary of the Treasury shall--
            (1) include in such report the latest incomplete draft or 
        version, if any, of such incomplete proposal or proposals; and
            (2) not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment 
        of this Act, complete and submit such proposal or proposals to 
        the committees identified in subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 81 (Thursday, April 25, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18410-18411]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10149]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Federal Bureau of Investigation


Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) Advisory Policy 
Board

    The Criminal Justice information Services (CJIS) Advisory Policy 
Board will meet on June 12-13, 1996, from 9 a.m. until 5 p.m., at the 
Holiday Inn Downtown/Riverfront, 200 North Fourth Street, St. Louis, 
Missouri, telephone 314-621-8200, to formulate recommendations to the 
Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) on the security, policy 
and operation of the National Crime Information Center (NCIC), NCIC 
2000, the Integrated Automated Fingerprint Identification System 
(IAFIS), and the Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) and National Incident 
Based Reporting System (NIBRS) programs.
    The topics to be discussed will include the progress of the NCIC 
2000 and IAFIS projects, status of the Brady Handgun Violence 
Prevention Act, and other topics related to the management of the FBI's 
criminal history information systems.
    The meeting will be open to the public on a first-come, first-
seated basis. Any member of the public may file a written statement 
concerning the FBI CJIS Division programs or related matters with the 
Board, before or after. Anyone wishing to address this session of the 
meeting should notify the Designated Federal Employee, at least 24 
hours prior to the start of the session. The notification may be by 
mail, telegram, cable, facsimile, or a hand-delivered note. It should 
contain the requestor's name; corporate designation, consumer 
affiliation, or Government designation; along with a short statement 
describing the topic to be addressed; and the time needed for

[[Page 18411]]

presentation. A nonmember requestor will ordinarily be allowed not more 
than 15 minutes to present a topic, unless specifically approved by the 
Chairman of the Board.
    Inquiries may be addressed to the Designated Federal Employee, Mr. 
Demery R. Bishop, Section Chief, Programs Development Section, CJIS 
Division, FBI, 935 Pennsylvania Avenue, Northwest, Washington, DC 
20537-9700, telephone 202-324-5084, facsimile 202-324-8906.
Demery R. Bishop,
Section Chief, Programs Development Section, Federal Bureau of 
Investigation, Designated Federal Employee.
[FR Doc. 96-10149 Filed 4-24-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-02-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 77 (Friday, April 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 19965]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9871]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Graduate Education and Research 
Development; Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Graduate Education and Research 
Development.
    Date and Time: May 8-9, 1995; 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., room 375, 
Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Roosevelt Y. Johnson, Program Director, 4201 
Wilson Blvd., room 907, Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: 306-1696.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to the Graduate Research Traineeships 
Program (GRT).
    Agenda: Review and evaluate GRT proposals.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are within exemptions 4 and 6 of 5 U.S.C. 
552b. (c) (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: April 17, 1995.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-9871 Filed 4-20-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Exhibit 32

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

         In connection with the annual report of FreeStar Technology Corporation
("Registrant") on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Report"), the undersigned,  in the
capacities and on the dates indicated below,  hereby certify pursuant to Section
906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  Section  1350) that to their
knowledge:

      1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Registrant.

Dated: October 27, 2004           By: /s/  Paul Egan
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Paul Egan, President

Dated: October 27, 2004           By: /s/  Ciaran Egan
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Ciaran Egan, Chief Financial Officer
#### KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION, Movant, v. William F. KNAPP, Jr., Respondent.

No. 92-SC-1029-KB.

Supreme Court of Kentucky.

Feb. 18, 1993.

Barbara S. Rea, Kentucky Bar Ass’n, Frankfort, for movant.

William F. Knapp, Jr., Williamstown, for respondent.

OPINION AND ORDER

This matter was submitted to the Court by the Kentucky Bar Association in accordance with SCR 3.370. The relevant facts follow.

On March 24, 1992, this Court suspended respondent pursuant to SCR 3.050 for failure to pay mandatory bar dues for the fiscal year 1991-1992. Despite this, respondent entered an appearance on behalf of a client in the Grant District Court on *550March 31, 1992, after the effective date of the above suspension.

The Board of Governors of the Kentucky Bar Association unanimously found that such conduct constituted the unauthorized practice of law in violation of SCR 3.130-5.5(a). It recommends that respondent be suspended from the practice of law for a period of sixty days following his reinstatement from the previous suspension.

Pursuant to SCR 3.370(9), this Court adopts the Board’s findings of fact and recommendation in full. At such time as respondent becomes eligible for reinstatement to practice law from this Court’s March 24, 1992, order of suspension, he shall thereafter remain suspended for an additional period of sixty days. Respondent is directed to comply with the notification requirements set forth in SCR 3.390. Respondent is further directed to pay all costs associated with this and any prior disciplinary proceedings prior to seeking reinstatement.

It is so ordered.

All concur.

ENTERED: February 18, 1993.

/s/ Robert F. Stephens

Chief Justice
Unassociated Document


    AMENDMENT
#1 TO OFFER OF EMPLOYMENT LETTER

    


    This
Amendment #1 (“Amendment #1”) to the
Offer of Employment Letter by and between Delta Three Israel, Ltd. (the “Company”) and Ziv
Zviel (“Executive”), dated as
of June 18, 2009 (the “Offer of Employment
Letter”), is dated May 13, 2010.

     

    Recitals:

     

    WHEREAS,
the Company and Executive entered into the Offer of Employment Letter and now
wish to enter into this Amendment #1 to amend the Offer of Employment Letter as
set forth below;

     

    NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the
foregoing recital and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto, intending to be
legally bound, hereby agree as follows:

     

    1.           Effective
as of May 5, 2010, all references to “Base Salary” in the Offer of Employment
Letter shall be deemed to refer to $11,000 per month.

    


    2.           The
sentence “For example, if your Base Salary (as indicated in the table above) is
36,000 NIS (at an exchange rate of 4 NIS for $1.00) and the car lease cost is
4,000 NIS per month, your reduced monthly Base Salary will be 32,000 NIS” found
on page 2 of the Offer of Employment Letter is hereby deleted in its entirety
and replaced with the following:

    


    “For
example, if your Base Salary (as indicated in the table above) is 44,000 NIS (at
an exchange rate of 4 NIS for $1.00) and the car lease cost is 4,500 NIS per
month, your reduced monthly Base Salary will be 39,500 NIS.”

     

    3.           Except
as expressly provided in this Amendment #1, all of the terms and conditions of
the Offer of Employment Letter remain unchanged, and the terms and conditions of
the Offer of Employment Letter remain in full force and effect.

     

    IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment #1 as of the
date first set forth above.

     

    
      
        
          	 	DELTA THREE ISRAEL,
      LTD.	 
	 	 	 	 
	
                   

                	
                  By:
      

                	/s/ Effi Baruch	 
	 	 	Name:
      Effi Baruch	 
	 	 	Title:   Chief
      Executive Officer and President	 


        

      

       

    

    
      
        
          
            
              
                
                  
                    
                      
                        
                          	
                                   

                                	/s/ Ziv Zviel	 
	 	Ziv
      Zviel