18724 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 83 / Monday, April 29, 1996 / Notices

warfare defensive capability in several

areas, including deterrence. This study

will be used to assist in analysis of

information warfare procedures,

processes, and mechanisms, and

illuminate future options in defensive

information warfare technology and

policy.

In accordance with Section 10(d) of

the Federal Advisory Committee Act,

Public Law 92–463, as amended

(5 U.S.C. App. II, (1988)), it has been

determined that this DSB Task Force

meeting concerns matters listed in 5

U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) (1988), and that

accordingly this meeting will be closed

to the public.

Dated: April 23, 1996.

L. M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison

Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 96–10528 Filed 4–26–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5000–04–M

Defense Science Board Task Force on

Image-Based Automatic Target

Recognition

ACTION: Notice of Advisory Committee

meetings.

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board

Task Force on Image-Based Automatic

Target Recognition will meet in closed

session on May 14–15, 1996 at

XONTECH, Inc. Van Nuys, California.

The mission of the Defense Science

Board is to advise the Secretary of

Defense through the Under Secretary of

Defense for Acquisition and Technology

on scientific and technical matters as

they affect the perceived needs of the

Department of Defense. At this meeting

the Task Force will assess the ability of

automatic/aided target recognition

technology and systems to support

important military missions, principally

in the near- and mid-term. The Task

Force should concentrate on those

technologies and systems that use

imagery (EO, IR or radar) as their

primary input medium.

In accordance with Section 10(d) of

the Federal Advisory Committee Act,

Public Law 92–463, as amended (5

U.S.C. App. II, (1988)), it has been

determined that this DSB Task Force

meeting concerns matters listed in 5

U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) (1988), and that

accordingly this meeting will be closed

to the public.

Dated: April 23, 1996.

L. M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison

Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 96–10529 Filed 4–26–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5000–04–M

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed

Forces; Proposed Rule Changes

ACTION: Notice of Proposed Changes to

the Rules of Practice and Procedure of

the United States Court of Appeals for

the Armed Forces.

SUMMARY: This notice announces the

following proposed changes

(underlined) to the Rules of Practice and

Procedure, United States Court of

Appeals for the Armed Forces for public

notice and comment:

Rule 24. Form and Content, Page

Limitations, Style, and Classified

Information

(a) Form and content. All briefs will

be legible and will be substantially as

follows:

In the United States Court of Appeals

For the Armed Forces

UNITED STATES, (Appellee),

(Appellant), (Respondent), v.

lllllllll,

(Full typed name, rank, service &

service no. of accused) (Appellant),

(Appellee), (Petitioner)

Brief on Behalf of (Appellant, Appellee,

Etc.)

Crim. App. No. lllll

USCA Dkt. No. lllll

Index of Brief

[See Rule 24(c)(2)]

Table of Cases, Statutes, and Other

Authorities Issue(s) Presented

[Set forth, in a concise statement,

each issue granted review by the Court,

raised in the certificate for review or

mandatory review case, or presented in

the petition for extraordinary relief, writ

appeal petition, or petition for new

trial.]

Statement of the Case

[Set forth a concise chronology

including the results of the accused’s

trial, action by the covening authority,

the officer exercising general courtmartial jurisdiction (if any), and the

Court of Criminal Appeals as well as

other pertinent information regarding

the proceedings, including, where

applicable, the date the petition for

review was granted.]

Statement of Facts

[Set forth a concise statement of the

facts of the case material to the issue or

issues presented, including specific

page references to each relevant portion

of the record of trial. Answers may

adopt appellant’s or petitioners’

statement of facts if there is no dispute,

may state additional facts, or, if there is

a dispute, may restate the facts as they

appear from appellee’s or respondent’s

viewpoint. The repetition of

uncontroverted matters is not desired.]

Summary of Argument

[Each brief and answer shall contain

a summary of argument, suitably

paragraphed to correspond to each

issue presented. The summary should

be a succinct, but accurate and clear

condensation of the arguments made in

the body of the brief.]

Argument

[Discuss briefly the point of law

presented, citing and quoting such

authorities as are deemed pertinent. The

argument must also include for each

issue presented a statement of the

applicable standard of review. The

standard of review may appear in the

discussion of each issue or under a

separate heading.]

Conclusion

[State the relief sought as to each

issue presented, for example, reversal of

the Court of Criminal Appeals decision

and dismissal of the charges, grant of a

new trial, the extraordinary relief

sought, etc. No particular form of

language is required, so long as the brief

concludes with a clear prayer for

specific Court action.]

Appendix

[The brief of the appellant or

petitioner shall include an appendix

containing a copy of the Court of

Criminal Appeals decision, unpublished

opinions cited in the brief, and relevant

extracts of rules and regulations. The

appellee or respondent shall similarly

file an appendix containing a copy of

any additional unpublished opinions

and relevant extracts of rules and

regulations cited in the answer.]

lllllllllllllllllllll

(Signature of counsel)

lllllllllllllllllllll

(Typed name of counsel)

lllllllllllllllllllll

(Address of counsel)

lllllllllllllllllllll

(Telephone no. of counsel)

CERTIFICATE OF FILING AND

SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing

was [mailed] [delivered] to the Court

and [mailed] [delivered] to (enter name

of each counsel of record) on

lllllllllllllllllllll

(date)

lllllllllllllllllllll

(Typed name and signature)
Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 83 / Monday, April 29, 1996 / Notices 18725

lllllllllllllllllllll

(Address and telephone no.)

* * * * *

DATES: Comments on the proposed

changes must be received by June 28,

1996.

ADDRESSES: Forward written comments

to Thomas F. Granahan, Clerk of Court,

United States Court of Appeals for the

Armed Forces, 450 E. Street, Northwest,

Washington, DC 20442–001

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Thomas F. Granahan, Clerk of Court,

telephone (202) 761–1448 (x600)

Dated: April 23, 1996.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison

Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 96–10526 Filed 4–26–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5000–04–M

Department of the Army

Armed Forces Institute of Pathology

(AFIP) Scientific Advisory Board

AGENCY: Department of the Army.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

SUMMARY: In Accordance with 10(a)(2)

of the Federal Advisory Committee Act,

Public Law (92–463), announcement is

made of the following open meeting:

Date: 9–10 May 1996.

Time: 8:00 am.

Place: Armed Forces Institute of

Pathology, Building 54, Washington,

DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Ridgely Rabold, Center for

Advanced Pathology (CAP), AFIP,

Building 54, Washington, DC 20306,

phone (202) 782–2553.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

General function of the board: The

Scientific Advisory Board provides

scientific and professional advice and

guidance on programs, policies, and

procedures of the AFIP.

Agenda: The board will hear status

reports from the AFIP Deputy Directors,

CAP Director, the National Museum of

Health and Medicine, and selected

pathology departments. Board members

will visit several of the pathology

departments.

Open board discussions: Reports will

be given on all visited departments. The

reports will consist of findings,

recommended areas of further research,

and suggested solutions. New trends

and/or technologies will be discussed

and goals established. The meeting is

open to the public.

Gregory D. Showalter,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 96–10474 Filed 4–26–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710–08–M

Army Science Board; Notice of Closed

Meeting

In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of

the Federal Advisory Committee Act

(P.L. 92–463), announcement is made

the following Committee Meeting:

Name of Committee: Army Science Board

(ASB).

Date of Meeting: 21–22 May 1996.

Place: Red Stone Arsenal, Huntsville,

Alabama.

Agenda: The Army Science Board’s (ASB)

Summer Study on ‘‘Unmanned Aerial

Vehicles (UAVs)’’ will meet for briefings and

discussions on the Army’s Concept of

Employment for UAV’s and View UVA

training operations. This meeting will be

closed to the public in accordance with

Section 522b(c) of Title 5, U.S.C., specifically

paragraph (1) thereof, and Title 5, U.S.C.,

Appendix 2, subsection 10(d). The classified

and unclassified matters to be discussed are

so inextricably intertwined so as to preclude

opening any portion of this meeting. For

further information, please contact Michelle

Diaz at (703) 695–0781.

Michelle P. Diaz,

Acting Administrative Officer, Army Science

Board.

[FR Doc. 96–10447 Filed 4–26–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710–08–M

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Notice of Proposed Information

Collection Requests

AGENCY: Department of Education.

ACTION: Submission for OMB review;

comment request.

SUMMARY: The Director, Information

Resources Group, invites comments on

the proposed information collection

requests as required by the Paperwork

Reduction Act of 1995.

DATES: Interested persons are invited to

submit comments on or before May 29,

1996.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should

be addressed to the Office of

Information and Regulatory Affairs,

Attention: Wendy Taylor, Desk Officer,

Department of Education, Office of

Management and Budget, 725 17th

Street, NW., Room 10235, New

Executive Office Building, Washington,

DC 20503. Requests for copies of the

proposed information collection

requests should be addressed to Patrick

J. Sherrill, Department of Education, 600

Independence Avenue SW., Room 5624,

Regional Office Building 3, Washington,

DC 20202–4651.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Patrick J. Sherrill (202) 708–8196.

Individuals who use a

telecommunications device for the deaf

(TDD) may call the Federal Information

Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339

between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern time,

Monday through Friday.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section

3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of

1995 (44 U. S. C. Chapter 35) requires

that the Office of Management and

Budget (OMB) provide interested

Federal agencies and the public an early

opportunity to comment on information

collection requests. OMB may amend or

waive the requirement for public

consultation to the extent that public

participation in the approval process

would defeat the purpose of the

information collection, violate State or

Federal law, or substantially interfere

with any agency’s ability to perform its

statutory obligations. The Director of the

Information Resources Group publishes

this notice containing proposed

information collection requests prior to

submission of these requests to OMB.

Each proposed information collection,

grouped by office, contains the

following: (1) Type of review requested,

e.g., new, revision, extension, existing

or reinstatement; (2) Title; (3) Summary

of the collection; (4) Description of the

need for, and proposed use of, the

information; (5) Respondents and

frequency of collection; and (6)

Reporting and/or Recordkeeping

burden. OMB invites public comment at

the address specified above. Copies of

the requests are available from Patrick J.

Sherrill at the address specified above.

Dated: April 23, 1996.

Gloria Parker,

Director, Information Resources Group.

Office of the Secretary

Type of Review: New.

Title: National Recognition Program

for Model Professional Development.

Frequency: One-time.

Affected Public: State, Local or Tribal

Gov’t., SEAs or LEAs.

Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping

Hour Burden:

Responses: 300.

Burden Hours: 6,400.

Abstract: With the importance of

professional development to school

reform and excellence in teaching and

learning, there is an immediate need to

identify and recognize model

professional development programs

throughout the country that have