Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 107 / Monday, June 7, 2021 / Notices 30263 

7See Order, 75 FR at 69052. 

1See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products 

from the People’s Republic of China: Affirmative 

Preliminary Determination of Circumvention 

Involving Malaysia, 85 FR 8823 (February 18, 2020) 

(Preliminary Determination), and accompanying 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

2See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products 

from India, Italy, the People’s Republic of China, 

the Republic of Korea and Taiwan: Amended Final 

Affirmative Antidumping Determination for India 

and Taiwan, and Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 

48390 (July 25, 2016); see also Certain CorrosionResistant Steel Products from India, Italy, Republic 

of Korea and the People’s Republic of China: 

Countervailing Duty Order, 81 FR 48387 (July 25, 

2016) (collectively, China CORE Orders). 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Anti-Circumvention Inquiries 

Involving Malaysia of the Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Orders on Certain CorrosionResistant Steel Products from the People’s Republic 

of China,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby 

adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

4See Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from the 

People’s Republic of China: Initiation of AntiCircumvention Inquiries on the Antidumping Duty 

and Countervailing Duty Orders, 84 FR 43585 

(August 21, 2019) (Initiation Notice), and 

accompanying Memorandum, ‘‘Certain CorrosionResistant Steel Products from the People’s Republic 

Continued 

7304.59.8050, 7304.59.8055, 

7304.59.8060, 7304.59.8065, and 

7304.59.8070. 

Although the HTSUS subheadings are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, our written description of the 

merchandise subject to this scope is 

dispositive.7

Analysis of Comments Received 

A complete discussion of all issues 

raised in this sunset review, including 

the likelihood of continuation or 

recurrence of dumping in the event of 

revocation of the Order and the 

magnitude of the margins likely to 

prevail if the Order were to be revoked, 

is provided in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. A list of the topics 

discussed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is attached as an 

appendix to this notice. The Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. 

Final Results of Sunset Review 

Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 

752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, Commerce 

determines that revocation of the Order 

on SSLP from China would be likely to 

lead to a continuation or recurrence of 

dumping, and that the magnitude of the 

dumping margins likely to prevail is up 

to 98.74 percent. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Orders 

This notice also serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under an APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. 

Timely notification of the return or 

destruction of APO materials, or 

conversion to judicial protective orders, 

is hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a violation which is subject to 

sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

These final results and notice are 

being issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), 

and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.218(f)(3) and 351.221(c)(5). 

Dated: June 1, 2021. 

Christian Marsh, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. History of the Order 

V. Legal Framework 

VI. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Likelihood of Continuation or 

Recurrence of Dumping 

Comment 2: Magnitude of the Dumping 

Margins Likely to Prevail 

VII. Final Results of Sunset Review 

VIII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2021–11847 Filed 6–4–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–026, C–570–027] 

Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel 

Products From the People’s Republic 

of China: Affirmative Final 

Determination of Circumvention 

Involving Malaysia 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that imports of 

certain corrosion-resistant steel 

products (CORE), completed in 

Malaysia, using hot-rolled steel (HRS) 

and/or cold-rolled steel (CRS) flat 

products (substrate) manufactured in 

the People’s Republic of China (China), 

are circumventing the antidumping duty 

(AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) 

orders on CORE from China. 

DATES: Applicable June 7, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joy 

Zhang, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1168. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On February 18, 2020, Commerce 

published the Preliminary 

Determination 1 of circumvention of the 

China CORE Orders.2 A summary of 

events that occurred since Commerce 

published the Preliminary 

Determination, as well as a full 

discussion of the issues raised by parties 

for this final determination, may be 

found in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.3 The Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is on file electronically via Enforcement 

and Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/ 

frn/. 

Scope of the Orders 

The products covered by these orders 

are certain flat-rolled steel products, 

either clad, plated, or coated with 

corrosion-resistant metals such as zinc, 

aluminum, or zinc-, aluminum-, nickelor iron-based alloys, whether or not 

corrugated or painted, varnished, 

laminated, or coated with plastics or 

other non-metallic substances in 

addition to the metallic coating. For a 

complete description of the scope of the 

orders, see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

Scope of the Anti-Circumvention 

Inquiries 

These anti-circumvention inquiries 

cover CORE completed in Malaysia from 

HRS and/or CRS substrate input 

manufactured in China and 

subsequently exported to the United 

States (merchandise subject to these 

inquiries). This final ruling applies to 

all shipments of merchandise subject to 

these inquiries entered on or after the 

date of the initiation of these inquiries.4


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
30264 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 107 / Monday, June 7, 2021 / Notices 

of China: Initiation of Anti-Circumvention Inquiries 

on the Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty 

Orders,’’ dated August 12, 2019. 

5See, e.g., Antidumping Duty Investigation of 

Certain Aluminum Foil from the People’s Republic 

of China: Affirmative Preliminary Determination of 

Sales at Less-Than-Fair Value and Postponement of 

Final Determination, 82 FR 50858, 50861 

(November 2, 2017), and accompanying Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum at ‘‘China’s Status as a NonMarket Economy,’’ unchanged in Certain 

Aluminum Foil from the People’s Republic of 

China: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than 

Fair Value, 83 FR 9282 (March 5, 2018). 

6See Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

7See Memorandum, ‘‘Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum for the Anti-Circumvention Inquiries 

of the Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty 

Orders on Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel 

Products from the People’s Republic of China,’’ 

dated February 7, 2020 (Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum). 

8See Federal Register notice, ‘‘Certain Corrosion 

Resistant Steel Products from Taiwan: Affirmative 

Final Determination of Anti-Circumvention Inquiry 

on the Antidumping Duty Order,’’ dated 

concurrently with this notice. 

9See China CORE Orders. 

10See Preliminary Determination, 85 FR at 8823, 

and accompanying Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum at 5 and 11. 

Importers and exporters of CORE 

produced in Malaysia using: (1) HRS 

manufactured in Malaysia or other third 

countries, (2) CRS manufactured in 

Malaysia using HRS produced in 

Malaysia or other third countries, or (3) 

CRS manufactured in other third 

countries, must certify that the HRS 

and/or CRS processed into CORE in 

Malaysia did not originate in China, as 

provided for in the certifications 

attached to this Federal Register notice. 

Otherwise, their merchandise will be 

subject to AD and CVD requirements. 

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting these anticircumvention inquiries in accordance 

with section 781(b) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act). Because 

China is a non-market economy, within 

the meaning of section 771(18) of the 

Act,5 Commerce calculated the value of 

Chinese-origin input costs using prices 

of factors of production and market 

economy values, as discussed in section 

773(c) of the Act. Because certain 

interested parties did not cooperate to 

the best of their abilities in responding 

to Commerce’s requests for information, 

we continue to base parts of our final 

determination on the facts available, 

with adverse inferences, pursuant to 

sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act.6 The 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

contains a full description of the 

methodology.7 We incorporate by 

reference this description of the 

methodology for our final 

determination. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs by parties in these 

inquiries are addressed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum. A list of the 

issues raised is attached to this notice as 

Appendix I. 

Based on our analysis of the 

comments received from interested 

parties, we made no revisions to the 

Preliminary Determination with regard 

to our analysis under the anticircumvention factors of section 781(b) 

of the Act. We have made certain 

changes to the language in the 

certifications to provide guidance on 

who should complete the exporter 

certification, and to allow importers and 

exporters to clearly identify the parties 

involved in the sale(s) involving the 

export to the United States. 

Final Affirmative Determination of 

Circumvention 

We determine that exports to the 

United States of CORE completed in 

Malaysia from HRS and/or CRS 

substrate manufactured in China are 

circumventing the China CORE Orders. 

We therefore find it appropriate to 

determine that merchandise subject to 

these inquiries should be considered to 

be within the scope of the China CORE 

Orders, and to instruct U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection (CBP) to continue 

to suspend liquidation of any entries of 

CORE completed in Malaysia using HRS 

and/or CRS substrate manufactured in 

China. 

Continuation of Suspension of 

Liquidation 

As stated above, Commerce has made 

an affirmative determination of 

circumvention of the China CORE 

Orders by exports to the United States 

of CORE completed in Malaysia using 

Chinese-origin HRS and/or CRS 

substrate. In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.225(1)(3), Commerce will direct 

CBP to continue to suspend liquidation 

and to require a cash deposit of 

estimated duties on unliquidated entries 

of CORE completed in Malaysia using 

Chinese-origin HRS and/or CRS 

substrate that were entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after August 12, 

2019, the date of initiation of these anticircumvention inquiries. The 

suspension of liquidation and cash 

deposit instructions will remain in 

effect until further notice. 

CORE produced in Malaysia from 

HRS or CRS substrate that is not of 

Chinese-origin is not subject to these 

inquiries. However, imports of such 

merchandise are subject to certification 

requirements, and cash deposits may be 

required if the certification 

requirements are not satisfied. 

Additionally, CORE completed in 

Malaysia from HRS and/or CRS from 

Taiwan also has been found to be 

circumventing the AD order on CORE 

from Taiwan and such merchandise is 

subject to similar certification 

requirements.8 Accordingly, if an 

importer imports CORE produced in 

Malaysia and claims that the CORE was 

produced from non-Chinese HRS or CRS 

substrate, in order not to be subject to 

AD and/or CVD requirements, the 

importer and exporter are required to 

meet the certification and 

documentation requirements described 

in Appendices II, III, and IV. The party 

that made the sale to the United States 

should fill out the exporter certification. 

In the situation where no certification 

is provided for an entry, and AD/CVD 

orders on CORE from China or the AD 

order on CORE from Taiwan potentially 

apply to that entry, Commerce intends 

to instruct CBP to suspend liquidation 

of the entry and collect cash deposits at 

the rates applicable under the China 

CORE Orders (i.e., the AD rate 

established for the China-wide entity 

(199.43 percent) and the CVD rate 

established for all-other Chinese 

producers/exporters (39.05 percent)).9

This is to prevent evasion, given that the 

rates applicable to the AD/CVD orders 

on CORE from China are higher than the 

all-others rate established by the AD 

order on CORE from Taiwan. In the 

situation where a certification is 

provided for the AD/CVD orders on 

CORE from China (stating that the 

merchandise was not produced from 

HRS and/or CRS from China), but no 

other certification is provided, then 

Commerce intends to instruct CBP to 

suspend the entry and collect cash 

deposits at the AD all-others rate 

applicable under the AD order on CORE 

from Taiwan (i.e., 3.66 percent). 

Further, for this final determination, 

we continue to determine that the 

following companies are not eligible for 

the certification process: FIW Steel Sdn 

Bhd; Hsin Kuang Steel Co Ltd; Nippon 

EGalv Steel Sdn Bhd; NS BlueScope 

Malaysia Sdn Bhd; and YKGI/Yung 

Kong Galv. Ind/Starshine Holdings Sdn 

Bhd/ASTEEL Sdn. Bhd. (YKGI Group) 

(collectively non-responsive 

companies).10 Accordingly, importers of 

CORE from Malaysia produced and/or 

exported by these ineligible companies 

are similarly ineligible for the 

certification process with regard to 

imports of CORE produced by, or 

sourced from, these companies. 

Additionally, exporters are not eligible 

to certify shipments of merchandise 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 107 / Monday, June 7, 2021 / Notices 30265 

produced by the above-listed 

companies. Accordingly, CBP shall 

suspend the entry and collect cash 

deposits for entries of merchandise 

produced and/or exported by these nonresponsive companies at the AD rate 

established for the China-wide entity 

(199.43 percent) and the CVD rate 

established for all other Chinese 

producers and/or exporters (39.05 

percent), pursuant to the China CORE 

Orders. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order 

This notice will serve as the only 

reminder to all parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of return/ 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and the terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This determination is issued and 

published in accordance with section 

781(b) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.225(f). 

Dated: June 1, 2021. 

Christian Marsh, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Orders 

IV. Scope of the Anti-Circumvention 

Inquiries 

V. Verification 

VI. Use of Facts Available With an Adverse 

Inference 

VII. Changes Since the Preliminary 

Determination 

VIII. Statutory Framework 

IX. Statutory Analysis 

X. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment: Whether CSC Steel Sdn Bhd 

(CSCM) Should be Excluded From Any 

Remedies Imposed Under the AntiCircumvention Inquiry 

XI. Recommendation 

Appendix II 

Certification Requirements 

If an importer imports certain corrosionresistant steel products (CORE) from 

Malaysia and claims that the CORE was not 

produced from hot-rolled steel and/or coldrolled steel substrate (substrate) 

manufactured in the People’s Republic of 

China (China), the importer is required to 

complete and maintain the importer 

certification attached hereto as Appendix III 

and all supporting documentation. Where the 

importer uses a broker to facilitate the entry 

process, it should obtain the entry summary 

number from the broker. Agents of the 

importer, such as brokers, however, are not 

permitted to make this certification on behalf 

of the importer. 

The exporter of such merchandise is 

required to complete and maintain the 

exporter certification, attached as Appendix 

IV, and is further required to provide the 

importer a copy of that certification and all 

supporting documentation. The party that 

made the sale to the United States should fill 

out the exporter certification. 

For any such certifications completed on 

the date of publication of this final 

determination through 20 days after the date 

of publication, exporters and importers 

should use the certifications attached to the 

Preliminary Determination. For any such 

certifications completed on or after 21 days 

after the date of publication of this final 

determination, exporters and importers 

should use the certifications contained below 

that have changed from the certifications 

issued with the Preliminary Determination. 

For entries on or after the date of 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register, for which certifications are 

required, importers should complete the 

required certification at or prior to the date 

of entry summary, and exporters should 

complete the required certification and 

provide it to the importer at or prior to the 

date of shipment. For all such entries made 

within the first 20 days after publication of 

this notice, exporters and importers should 

use the certifications attached to the 

Preliminary Determination. For all entries 

made on or after 21 days after publication of 

this notice, exporters and importers should 

use the certifications contained below that 

have changed from the certifications issued 

with the Preliminary Determination. 

The importer and exporter are also 

required to maintain sufficient 

documentation supporting their 

certifications. The importer will not be 

required to submit the certifications or 

supporting documentation to U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection (CBP) as part of the 

entry process at this time. However, the 

importer and the exporter will be required to 

present the certifications and supporting 

documentation to Commerce and/or CBP, as 

applicable, upon request by the respective 

agency. Additionally, the claims made in the 

certifications and any supporting 

documentation are subject to verification by 

Commerce and/or CBP. The importer and 

exporter are required to maintain the 

certifications and supporting documentation 

for the later of: (1) A period of five years from 

the date of entry or (2) a period of three years 

after the conclusion of any litigation in 

United States courts regarding such entries. 

In the situation where no certification is 

maintained for an entry, and AD/CVD orders 

on CORE from China or the AD order on 

CORE from Taiwan potentially apply to that 

entry, Commerce intends to instruct CBP to 

suspend the entry and collect cash deposits 

at the rate applicable under the China CORE 

Orders (i.e., the AD rate established for the 

China-wide entity (199.43 percent) and the 

CVD rate established for all-other Chinese 

producers/exporters (39.05 percent)). In the 

situation where a certification is provided for 

the AD/CVD orders on CORE from China 

(stating that the merchandise was not 

produced from HRS and/or CRS from China), 

but no other certification is provided, then 

Commerce intends to instruct CBP to 

suspend the entry and collect cash deposits 

at the AD all-others rate applicable under the 

AD order on CORE from Taiwan (i.e., 3.66%). 

Appendix III 

Importer Certification 

I hereby certify that: 

(A) My name is {IMPORTING COMPANY 

OFFICIAL’S NAME} and I am an official of 

{NAME OF IMPORTING COMPANY}, 

located at {ADRESS OF IMPORTING 

COMPANY}. 

(B) I have direct personal knowledge of the 

facts regarding the importation into the 

Customs territory of the United States of the 

corrosion resistant steel products produced 

in Malaysia that entered under entry 

number(s), identified below, and which are 

covered by this certification. ‘‘Direct personal 

knowledge’’ refers to facts the certifying party 

is expected to have in its own records. For 

example, the importer should have direct 

personal knowledge of the importation of the 

product (e.g., the name of the exporter) in its 

records. 

(C) If the importer is acting on behalf of the 

first U.S. customer, complete this paragraph; 

if not, put ‘‘NA’’ at the end of this paragraph: 

The corrosion resistant steel products 

covered by this certification were imported 

by {NAME OF IMPORTING COMPANY} on 

behalf of {NAME OF U.S. CUSTOMER}, 

located at {ADDRESS OF U.S. CUSTOMER}. 

(D) The corrosion resistant steel products 

covered by this certification were shipped to 

{NAME OF PARTY TO WHOM 

MERCHANDISE WAS FIRST SHIPPED IN 

THE UNITED STATES}, located at 

{ADDRESS OF SHIPMENT}. 

(E) I have personal knowledge of the facts 

regarding the production of the corrosion 

resistant steel products identified below. 

‘‘Personal knowledge’’ includes facts 

obtained from another party (e.g., 

correspondence received by the importer (or 

exporter) from the producer regarding the 

country of manufacture of the imported 

products). 

(F) The corrosion resistant steel products 

covered by this certification were not 

manufactured using hot-rolled steel and/or 

cold-rolled steel substrate produced in China. 

(G) This certification applies to the 

following entries (repeat this block as many 

times as necessary): 

Entry Summary #: 

Entry Summary Line Item #: 

Foreign Seller: 

Foreign Seller’s address: 

Foreign Seller’s Invoice #: 

Foreign Seller’s Invoice Line Item #: 

Producer: 

Producer’s Address: 

(H) I understand that {NAME OF 

IMPORTING COMPANY} is required to 

maintain a copy of this certification and 

sufficient documentation supporting this 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
30266 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 107 / Monday, June 7, 2021 / Notices 

certification (i.e., documents maintained in 

the normal course of business, or documents 

obtained by the certifying party, for example, 

mill certificates, production records, 

invoices, etc.) for the later of: (1) A period of 

five years from the date of entry or (2) a 

period of three years after the conclusion of 

any litigation in the United States courts 

regarding such entries. 

(I) I understand that {NAME OF 

IMPORTING COMPANY} is required to 

provide this certification and supporting 

records, upon request, to U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) and/or the 

Department of Commerce (Commerce). 

(J) I understand that {NAME OF 

IMPORTING COMPANY} is required to 

maintain a copy of the exporter’s certification 

(attesting to the production and/or export of 

the imported merchandise identified above), 

and any supporting records provided by the 

exporter to the importer, for the later of: (1) 

A period of five years from the date of entry 

or (2) a period of three years after the 

conclusion of any litigation in United States 

courts regarding such entries. 

(K) I understand that {NAME OF 

IMPORTING COMPANY}is required, upon 

request, to provide a copy of the exporter’s 

certification and any supporting records 

provided by the exporter to the importer, to 

CBP and/or Commerce. 

(L) I understand that the claims made 

herein, and the substantiating 

documentation, are subject to verification by 

CBP and/or Commerce. 

(M) I understand that failure to maintain 

the required certifications, and/or failure to 

substantiate the claims made herein, and/or 

failure to allow CBP and/or Commerce to 

verify the claims made herein, may result in 

a de facto determination that all entries to 

which this certification applies are within 

the scope of the antidumping/countervailing 

duty order on corrosion resistant steel 

products from China. I understand that such 

finding will result in: 

(i) Suspension of liquidation of all 

unliquidated entries (and entries for which 

liquidation has not become final) for which 

these requirements were not met; 

(ii) the requirement that the importer post 

applicable antidumping duty and/or 

countervailing duty cash deposits (as 

appropriate) equal to the rates determined by 

Commerce; and 

(iii) the revocation of {NAME OF 

IMPORTING COMPANY}’s privilege to 

certify future imports of corrosion resistant 

steel products from Malaysia as not 

manufactured using hot-rolled steel and/or 

cold-rolled steel substrate from China. 

(N) I understand that agents of the 

importer, such as brokers, are not permitted 

to make this certification. 

(O) This certification was completed at or 

prior to the date of entry summary. 

(P) I am aware that U.S. law (including, but 

not limited to, 18 U.S.C. 1001) imposes 

criminal sanctions on individuals who 

knowingly and willfully make material false 

statements to the U.S. government. 

lllllllllllllllllllll

Signature 

lllllllllllllllllllll

NAME OF COMPANY OFFICIAL 

lllllllllllllllllllll

TITLE 

lllllllllllllllllllll

DATE 

Appendix IV 

Exporter Certification 

Special Instructions: The party that made 

the sale to the United States should fill out 

the exporter certification. 

I hereby certify that: 

(A) My name is {COMPANY OFFICIAL’S 

NAME} and I am an official of {NAME OF 

COMPANY}, located at {ADDRESS}; 

(B) I have direct personal knowledge of the 

facts regarding the production and 

exportation of the corrosion resistant steel 

products identified below. ‘‘Direct personal 

knowledge’’ refers to facts the certifying party 

is expected to have in its own books and 

records. For example, an exporter should 

have direct personal knowledge of the 

producer’s identity and location. 

(C) The corrosion resistant steel products 

produced in Malaysia and covered by this 

certification were not manufactured using 

hot-rolled steel and/or cold-rolled steel 

substrate produced in China. 

(D) This certification applies to the 

following sales to {NAME OF U.S. 

CUSTOMER}, located at {ADDRESS OF U.S. 

CUSTOMER} (repeat this block as many 

times as necessary): 

Foreign Seller’s Invoice # to U.S. Customer: 

Foreign Seller’s Invoice to U.S. Customer 

Line item #: 

Producer Name: 

Producer’s Address: 

Producer’s Invoice # to Foreign Seller: (If the 

foreign seller and the producer are the 

same party, put NA here.) 

(E) The corrosion resistant steel products 

covered by this certification were shipped to 

{NAME OF U.S. PARTY TO WHOM 

MERCHANDISE WAS SHIPPED}, located at 

{U.S. ADDRESS TO WHICH MERCHANDISE 

WAS SHIPPED}. 

(F) I understand that {NAME OF 

EXPORTING COMPANY} is required to 

maintain a copy of this certification and 

sufficient documentation supporting this 

certification (i.e., documents maintained in 

the normal course of business, or documents 

obtained by the certifying party, for example, 

mill certificates, production records, 

invoices, etc.) for the later of: (1) A period of 

five years from the date of entry or (2) a 

period of three years after the conclusion of 

any litigation in the United States courts 

regarding such entries. 

(G) I understand that {NAME OF 

EXPORTING COMPANY} must provide a 

copy of this Exporter Certification to the U.S. 

importer by the date of shipment; 

(H) I understand that {NAME OF 

EXPORTING COMPANY} is required to 

provide a copy of this certification and 

supporting records, upon request, to U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and/or 

the Department of Commerce (Commerce). 

(I) I understand that the claims made 

herein, and the substantiating 

documentation, are subject to verification by 

CBP and/or Commerce. 

(J) I understand that failure to maintain the 

required certification, and/or failure to 

substantiate the claims made herein, and/or 

failure to allow CBP and/or Commerce to 

verify the claims made herein, may result in 

a de facto determination that all sales to 

which this certification applies are within 

the scope of the antidumping/countervailing 

duty order on corrosion resistant steel 

products from China. I understand that such 

finding will result in: 

(i) Suspension of all unliquidated entries 

(and entries for which liquidation has not 

become final) for which these requirements 

were not met; and 

(ii) the requirement that the importer post 

applicable antidumping duty and/or 

countervailing duty cash deposits (as 

appropriate) equal to the rates as determined 

by Commerce; and 

(iii) the revocation of {NAME OF 

EXPORTING COMPANY}’s privilege to 

certify future exports of corrosion resistant 

steel products from Malaysia as not 

manufactured using hot-rolled steel and/or 

cold-rolled steel substrate from China. 

(K) This certification was completed at or 

prior to the date of shipment. 

(L) I am aware that U.S. law (including, but 

not limited to, 18 U.S.C. 1001) imposes 

criminal sanctions on individuals who 

knowingly and willfully make material false 

statements to the U.S. government. 

lllllllllllllllllllll

Signature 

lllllllllllllllllllll

NAME OF COMPANY OFFICIAL 

lllllllllllllllllllll

TITLE 

lllllllllllllllllllll

DATE 

[FR Doc. 2021–11849 Filed 6–4–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

[RTID 0648–XB006] 

Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to 

Specified Activities; Taking Marine 

Mammals Incidental to Marine Site 

Characterization Surveys Off of 

Massachusetts and Rhode Island 

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries 

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice; proposed incidental 

harassment authorization; request for 

comments on proposed authorization 

and possible renewal. 

SUMMARY: NMFS has received a request 

from Vineyard Wind 1, LLC (Vineyard 

Wind 1) for authorization to take marine 

mammals incidental to marine site 

characterization surveys off of 

Massachusetts and Rhode Island. 

Pursuant to the Marine Mammal 

Protection Act (MMPA), NMFS is 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES