Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 81 / Thursday, April 25, 1996 / Proposed Rules 18311

40 CFR Part 52

[WI68–01–7294b; FRL–5461–8]

Approval and Promulgation of

Implementation Plan; Wisconsin;

Industrial Adhesives SIP Revision

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: The EPA proposes to approve

a revision to the Wisconsin State

Implementation Plan (SIP) for ozone

that was submitted on December 11,

1995 and later supplemented on January

12, 1996. This revision consists of a

volatile organic compound (VOC)

regulation to control emissions from

industrial adhesives operations in ozone

nonattainment areas classified as

moderate or worse. In the final rules of

this Federal Register, the EPA is

approving this action as a direct final

without prior proposal because EPA

views this as a noncontroversial action

and anticipates no adverse comments. If

no adverse comments are received in

response to that direct final rule, no

further activity is contemplated in

relation to this proposed rule. If EPA

receives adverse comments, the direct

final rule will be withdrawn and all

public comments received will be

addressed in a subsequent final rule

based on this proposed rule. The EPA

will not institute a second comment

period on this action. Any parties

interested in commenting on this

document should do so at this time.

DATES: Comments on this proposed

action must be received by May 28,

1996.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should

be sent to: Carlton T. Nash, Chief,

Regulation Development Section, Air

Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S. EPA, 77

West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,

Illinois 60604.

Copies of the proposed SIP revision

and EPA’s analysis are available for

inspection at the U.S. EPA, Region 5,

Air and Radiation Division, 77 West

Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois

60604. (Please telephone Douglas

Aburano at (312) 353–6960 before

visiting the Region 5 Office.)

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Douglas Aburano, Environmental

Engineer, Regulation Development

Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J),

U.S. EPA , Region 5, Chicago, Illinois

60604, (312) 353–6960.

Authority: 42 U.S. C. 7401–7671q.

Dated: April 5, 1996.

Valdas V. Adamkus,

Regional Administrator.

[FR Doc. 96–10130 Filed 4–24–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

40 CFR Part 52

[FL–64–2–9611b; FRL–5444–5]

Approval and Promulgation of

Implementation Plans Florida:

Approval of Revisions to the Florida

SIP

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: The EPA proposes to approve

the State implementation plan (SIP)

revision submitted by the State of

Florida which includes amendments to

the federally enforceable state operating

permit program and the SIP regulations

for perchloroethylene dry cleaning

facilities. In the final rules section of

this Federal Register, the EPA is

approving the State’s SIP revision as a

direct final rule without prior proposal

because the Agency views this as a

noncontroversial revision amendment

and anticipates no adverse comments. A

detailed rationale for the approval is set

forth in the direct final rule. If no

adverse comments are received in

response to this proposed rule, no

further activity is contemplated in

relation to this proposed rule. If EPA

receives adverse comments, the direct

final rule will be withdrawn and all

public comments received will be

addressed in a subsequent final rule

based on this proposed rule. The EPA

will not institute a second comment

period on this document. Any parties

interested in commenting on this

document should do so at this time.

DATES: To be considered, comments

must be received by May 28, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Written comments on this

action should be addressed to Joey

LeVasseur, at the EPA Regional Office

listed below. Copies of the documents

relative to this action are available for

public inspection during normal

business hours at the following

locations.

Air and Radiation Docket and

Information Center (Air Docket 6102),

U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency, 401 M Street, SW.,

Washington, DC 20460.

EPA, Region 4 Air Programs Branch, 345

Courtland Street, NE., Atlanta,

Georgia 30365.

Florida Department of Environmental

Protection, Twin Towers Office

Building, 2600 Blair Stone Road,

Tallahassee, Florida 32399–2400.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Interested persons wanting to examine

documents relative to this action should

make an appointment with the Region 4

Air Programs Branch at least 24 hours

before the visiting day. To schedule the

appointment or to request additional

information, contact Joey LeVasseur,

Regulatory Planning and Development

Section, Air Programs Branch, Air,

Pesticides & Toxics Management

Division, Region 4 EPA, 345 Courtland

Street, NE., Atlanta, Georgia 30365. The

telephone number is 404/347–3555 ext.

4215. Reference file FL64–2–9611b.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For

additional information see the direct

final rule which is published in the

rules section of this Federal Register.

Dated: January 26, 1995.

Phyllis P. Harris,

Acting Regional Administrator.

[FR Doc. 96–10128 Filed 4–24–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

47 CFR Chapter I

[CC Docket No. 96–98, FCC 96–182]

Implementation of the Local

Competition Provisions in the

Telecommunications Act of 1996

AGENCY: Federal Communications

Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: In enacting the

Telecommunications Act of 1996 (1996

Act) Congress sought to establish a procompetitive, deregulatory national

policy framework for the

telecommunications industry. In adding

new sections 251, 252, and 253 to the

Communications Act of 1934, Congress

set forth a blueprint for ending

monopolies in local

telecommunications markets. Section

251(d)(1) of the Act directs the

Commission to establish rules to

implement the requirements of Section

251. In this Notice of Proposed

Rulemaking (‘‘NPRM’’) the Commission

seeks to implement the local

competition provisions of the 1996 Act.

The Commission’s rules that arise from

this rulemaking proceeding will serve to

promote the procompetitive provisions

of the statute. These rules will assist

incumbent LECs, telecommunications

carriers, state commissions, the

Commission, and the courts in defining

rights and responsibilities regarding