alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Gregory D. Brown, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of BioForce Nanosciences Holdings, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a  15(f) and 15d  15(f)) for the registrant and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;



(c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  August 28, 2008





/s/ Gregory D. Brown

Gregory D. Brown

Principal Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

  

**CAMBER ENERGY, INC.******

****Certification Pursuant to****

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**as Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Camber Energy, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2021, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James Doris, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                      |
|   | (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

 

| Date: May 19, 2022 |   | */s/ James Doris*                        |   |
|--------------------|--------|------------------------------------------|--------|
|               |   | James Doris

Principal Executive Officer |   |
The Honorable Michael J. Melloy, Chief Judge, United States District Court for 1

the Northern District of Iowa.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-2668

___________

Ericka Roth; Ginger Roth; Midwest *

Timber Component Corporation, *

*

Appellants, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the 

* Northern District of Iowa.

Roger Halvorson; Monona Enterprises, *

Inc.; Union State Bank; James Burger; * [UNPUBLISHED]

Double L Group, Ltd.; Mike Sullivan; *

Houston Davis; Steve McCorkindale; *

Gary Walton, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: March 5, 1998

 Filed: March 13, 1998

___________

Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit

Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Ericka Roth, Ginger Roth, and Midwest Timber Component Corporation appeal

the District Court’s order dismissing their suit for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 1
-2-

After careful review of the record and the parties’ submissions, we conclude the

District Court did not commit error. We thus affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### Terry MILNE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 64055.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Nov. 2, 1993.

Rosalynn Koch, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We find no clear error and affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Further, we find an opinion in this matter would have no precedential value and affirm by written order. We have provided a memorandum for use by the parties only.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Coast Guard

          - 33 CFR Part 165
          - [Docket No. USCG-2021-0309]

# AGENCY:

Coast Guard, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice of enforcement of regulation.

# SUMMARY:

The Coast Guard will enforce the safety zone for the LaPointe Fireworks in LaPointe, WI from 8 p.m. through 10:30 p.m. on July 4, 2021. This action is necessary to protect participants and spectators during the LaPointe Fireworks. During the enforcement period, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Duluth or designated on-scene representative.

# DATES:

The regulations in 33 CFR 165.943(b) will be enforced from 8 p.m. through 10:30 p.m. on July 4, 2021, for the LaPointe Fireworks safety zone, § 165.943(a)(6).

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

If you have questions on this document, call or email MST2 Jeremy Davis, telephone (218) 725-3823, email *DuluthWWM@uscg.mil*.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Coast Guard will enforce the safety zone for the annual LaPointe Fireworks in 33 CFR 165.943(a)(6) from 8 p.m. through 10:30 p.m. on July 4, 2021 on all waters of Lake Superior bounded by the arc of a circle with a 350-foot radius from the fireworks launch site with its center in position 46°46′40″ N, 090°47′22″ W.

Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Duluth or their designated on-scene representative. The Captain of the Port's designated on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16.

This document is issued under authority of 33 CFR 165.943 and 5 U.S.C. 552(a). In addition to this publication in the **Federal Register**, the Coast Guard will provide the maritime community with advance notification of the enforcement of this safety zone via Broadcast Notice to Mariners.

Dated: May 24, 2021.

F.M. Smith,

Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Duluth.

[FR Doc. 2021-11288 Filed 5-27-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 82 (Friday, April 26, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18619-18620]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10324]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[MT-924-1430-01; MTM 83069]


Opening of Land in a Proposed Withdrawal; Montana

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The temporary 2-year segregation of a proposed withdrawal of 
1,800.10 acres of National Forest System land for the Cave Mountain 
Research Natural Area expires on June 15, 1996, and the land will be 
open to mining. It has been and remains open to surface entry and 
mineral leasing.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 15, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sandra Ward, BLM Montana State Office, 
P.O. Box 36800, Billings, Montana 59107, 406-255-2949.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A Notice of proposed withdrawal was 
published in the Federal Register, 59 FR 30951, June 16, 1994, which 
segregated the land described therein for up to 2 years from location 
and entry under the mining laws, subject to valid existing rights, but 
not from other forms of disposition which may by law be made of 
National Forest System land. The 2-year segregation expires June 15, 
1996. The withdrawal application will continue to be processed, unless 
it is canceled or denied. The land is described as follows:

Principal Meridian, Montana

T. 10 S., R. 1 W.,
    Sec. 31, lots 3 and 4, E\1/2\, and E\1/2\SW\1/4\;
    Sec. 32, NE\1/4\, W\1/2\, NE\1/4\SE\1/4\, and W\1/2\SE\1/4\.
T. 11 S., R 1 W.,
    Sec. 5, W\1/2\NE\1/4\ and NW\1/4\;
    Sec. 6, N\1/2\ and N\1/2\S\1/2\.

    The area described contains 1,800.10 acres in Madison County.

    At 9 a.m., on June 15, 1996, the land will be opened to location 
and entry under the United States mining laws, subject to valid 
existing rights, the

[[Page 18620]]

provisions of existing withdrawals, other segregations of record, and 
the requirements of applicable law. Appropriation of any lands 
described in this order under the general mining laws prior to the date 
and time of restoration is unauthorized. Any such attempted 
appropriation, including attempting adverse possession under 30 U.S.C. 
38 (1988), shall vest no rights against the United States. Acts 
required to establish a location and to initiate a right of possession 
are governed by State law where not in conflict with Federal law. The 
Bureau of Land Management will not intervene in disputes between rival 
locators over possessory rights, since Congress has provided for such 
determinations in local courts.

    Dated: April 18, 1996.
Thomas P. Lonnie,
Deputy State Director, Division of Resources.
[FR Doc. 96-10324 Filed 4-25-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-DN-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Desmond Waul, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Belli, J.), rendered November 19, 1988, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Mangano, P. J., Kunzeman, Kooper, Sullivan and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Annual Report of Equality  Investments,  Inc. on
Form  10-KSB  for the  period  ending  December  31,  2002,  as  filed  with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, B.
Stephen Bailey, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/S/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President, Director
(Principal Executive Officer)


April 19, 2004


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**Sydys      Corporation**
**March      31, 2006**

|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                  |                                                  |                                     |
|-------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|                                                  |                                                  |
|                                             |                                             |                                |
| Date: May                12,                2006 | By:                                         | /s/ Kenneth                J. Koock |
|                                                  | Chief                Executive                Officer |
#### United States Life Insurance Company in the City of New York, Respondent, v John J. Burke Associates et al., Appellants.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Irma Vidal Santaella, J.), entered on June 26, 1989, which denied defendants’ motion, pursuant to CPLR 2221, 5015, 317 and 3213, for renewal of a motion to vacate a default on a motion for summary judgment on an instrument for the payment of money only, is unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Renewal was properly denied, since it was based on facts that were or should have been known to the defendants at the time of their original motion to vacate, and there was no explanation as to why those facts were not asserted on the first motion *(Matter of Beiny,*132 AD2d 190, 209-210, *Iv dismissed*71 NY2d 994). It was not an abuse of discretion for the IAS court to decline to excuse deficiency.

Similarly, it was not an abuse of the IAS court’s discretion to find that neither a reasonable excuse for the default nor a meritorious defense was demonstrated *(Picotte Realty v Aragona,*87 AD2d 955, 956). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Rosenberger, Asch, Smith and Rubin, JJ.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6362

Diebold Nixdorf Incorporated:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_05.09.19.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
Unassociated Document


     Exhibit
10.1

     

    Summary
description of the Company’s 2010 Cash Bonus Plan for Management

     

    On
January 11, 2010, upon the approval of the operating plan for fiscal 2010 of The
Orchard Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”), the Compensation Committee of the
Board of Directors of the Company established cash bonus targets and performance
criteria for performance-based cash awards to the Company’s management for
fiscal 2010.  The following table presents the fiscal 2010 bonus
targets established by the Compensation Committee for the Company’s named
executive officers:

    


    
      
        	
                Name

              	
                Title

              	
                Fiscal 2010 Bonus Target

              
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
                Brad
      Navin

              	
                Interim
      Chief Executive Officer

              	
                $125,000

              
	
                Nathan
      Fong

              	
                Chief
      Financial Officer

              	
                  $75,000

              


      

    

    


    For each
of the named executive officers, the bonus for fiscal 2010 is based one-third on
achieving revenue metrics as reported on a GAAP basis, one-third on achieving
EBITDA metrics as reported in the Company’s earnings releases and one-third on
the discretion of the Compensation Committee.  

    


    The
target revenue and EBITDA metrics include a range of targets based on the 2010
operating plan which could result in the named executive officers receiving a
percentage (which could exceed 100%) of their bonus target amounts depending on
where the actual results fall within the range of the established
metrics.  Actual bonus payments may range from 33% of the target
amounts, if actual results meet the minimum target amounts, to 100% of the
target amounts, if the Company meets the base case targets.  No bonus
amount is payable if actual results are below the minimum target amounts, unless
the Compensation Committee approves the discretionary portion of the bonus
plan.  In addition, if the Company’s actual results for 2010 exceed
the Company’s base case targets, the named executive officers may receive a
maximum of 125% of their bonus target amounts depending on actual results. The
Company believes that the base case target revenue and EBITDA metrics are
achievable if the Company meets the base case 2010 operating plan.
<Page>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.01

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with this quarterly report of ML Cornerstone FuturesAccess LLC
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this "Report"), I, Robert
M. Alderman, Chief Executive Officer, President and Manager of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: August 12, 2005

By /s/ ROBERT M. ALDERMAN
   ----------------------
Robert M. Alderman
Chief Executive Officer, President and Manager
(Principal Executive Officer)
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

SANDRA TRUJILLO NORTH and PHILIP DOUGLAS NORTH

, Appellant,

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 16

- 1960

[ October 11, 2017 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm

Beach County ; Peter D. Blanc , Judge; L.T. Case No.

2012CA00912XXXMB

.

Kenzie N. Sadlak of Kenzie N. Sadlak, PA, Miami, for appellant.

Michele L. Stocker of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Fort Lauderd a le, and

Kim b erly S. Mello, Laura J . Ba ssini , and Joseph Picone of Greenberg

Traurig, P.A., Tampa, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee , 377 So. 2d

1150 (Fla. 1979).

D AMOORGIAN

, C ONNER and F ORST , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.