alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5540 

To provide for the Secretary of Health and Human Services to maintain 

a national list of licensed private child placement agencies, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2023 

Mr. LAMBORN (for himself, Ms. KUSTER, and Mr. SMUCKER) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To provide for the Secretary of Health and Human Services 

to maintain a national list of licensed private child placement agencies, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘In Good Standing 

5 Adoption Agencies Act of 2023’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5540 IH

1 SEC. 2. NATIONAL LIST OF LICENSED CHILD PLACEMENT 

2 AGENCIES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 474 of the Social Security 

4 Act (42 U.S.C. 674) is amended by adding at the end the 

5 following: 

6 ‘‘(h) NATIONAL LIST OF LICENSED CHILD PLACE7 MENT AGENCIES.— 

8 ‘‘(1) STATE REPORTING.— 

9 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than Janu10 ary 1 of each fiscal year, a State with a plan 

11 approved under this part for the fiscal year 

12 shall submit to the Secretary a list of private 

13 child placement agencies that, as of the end of 

14 the preceding fiscal year, were licensed or ac15 credited by, and in good standing with, the 

16 State and exempt from Federal income tax by 

17 reason of section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Rev18 enue Code of 1986. 

19 ‘‘(B) CHILD PLACEMENT AGENCY.—In 

20 subparagraph (A), the term ‘child placement 

21 agency’ means an agency that places children in 

22 prospective adoptive homes. 

23 ‘‘(2) NATIONAL LIST.—The Secretary, through 

24 the United States Children’s Bureau, shall compile 

25 and maintain a publicly available list consisting of 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 5540 IH

1 each list most recently submitted by a State under 

2 paragraph (1). 

3 ‘‘(3) ANNUAL REPORTS TO CONGRESS.—Not 

4 later than the 2nd December 31 after the date of 

5 the enactment of this subsection, and annually 

6 thereafter, the Secretary shall submit to the Con7 gress a written report that contains the list main8 tained under paragraph (2) and identifies any child 

9 placement agency that is licensed by a State and is 

10 not on the list, and a specification of any discipli11 nary actions that a State has taken against a private 

12 child placement agency.’’. 

13 (b) LOSS OF ELIGIBILITY FOR ADOPTION AND

14 LEGAL GUARDIANSHIP INCENTIVE PAYMENTS FOR FAIL15 URE OF STATE TO COMPLY WITH LIST SUBMISSION RE16 QUIREMENT.—Section 473A(b) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 

17 673b(b)) is amended— 

18 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph 

19 (3); 

20 (2) by striking the period at the end of para21 graph (4) and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

22 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

23 ‘‘(5) the State has complied with section 

24 474(h)(1) with respect to the preceding fiscal year.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
#### Robert L. ALFORD and Beverly Alford, Appellants, v. Gerald A. MEYER and Rose Ann Meyer, Respondents.

No. WD 50007.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

May 9, 1995.

Jefferson G. Broady, Rock Port, for appellants.

*235Larry L. Zahnd, Zahnd, Ross and Thomson, Maryville, for respondents.

Before ULRICH, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and ELLIS, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellants sought to quiet title to a disputed parcel of farm land adjoining that of their neighbors. The trial court found for the respondent neighbors on their counterclaim for adverse possession. Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 3.8


                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                                CLARK USA, INC.



                   -----------------------------------------

                   Adopted in accordance with the provisions
                   of Section 242 of the General Corporation
                          Law of the State of Delaware

                   -----------------------------------------

     I, William C. Rusnack, Chief Executive Officer and President of CLARK USA,
INC., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of
Delaware (the "Corporation"), hereby certify as follows:

     FIRST: That the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation
was filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on December 28,
1994 and that Certificates of Amendment thereto were filed with the Secretary of
State of the State of Delaware on February 23, 1995; on November 3, 1995; on
three (3) occasions on October 1, 1997; on January 15, 1998; and on August 7,
1998 (as so amended, the "Certificate of Incorporation").

     SECOND:  That the first paragraph of Article 4 of the Certificate of
Incorporation of the Corporation is hereby amended to read in its entirety as
follows:

          ARTICLE 4.  The total number of shares of capital stock which the
     Corporation shall have the authority to issue is 250,100 shares, consisting
     of (a) 100 shares of "Common Stock", par value $.01 per share and (b)
     250,000 shares of "Preferred Stock", par value $.01 per share.  Upon the
     effectiveness of this Certificate of Amendment (the "Effective Time"), each
     share of Common Stock of the Corporation shall automatically be
     reclassified and converted into .0000015 fully paid and non-assessable
     shares of Common Stock.
<PAGE>

     THIRD: That sub-paragraphs C and D of Article 4 of the Certificate of
Incorporation of the Corporation are hereby deleted in their entirety.

     FOURTH:  That such amendment has been duly adopted in accordance with
Sections 242 and 228 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed this Certificate of
Amendment this 28th day of December, 1999.



                                    CLARK USA, INC.


                                    By:  /s/  William C. Rusnack
                                         -------------------------------------
                                         William C. Rusnack
                                         Chief Executive Officer and President
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Mountain Bank Holding Company (the Company)
on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Roy T. Brooks, Chief Executive Officer and Sheila M. Brumley, Chief Financial Officer,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the
operations of the Company.



|                                       |  |  |  |                                           
|-------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------
|/s/    ROY T.
BROOKS                   |  |  |  | /s/    SHEILA M.
BRUMLEY                  
|Roy T. Brooks, Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Sheila M. Brumley, Chief Financial Officer

Date: March 23, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 3, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 157]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-00017]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Secretary of Agriculture's Special Cotton Quota Announcement 
Number 13

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, USDA.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: A special import quota for upland cotton equal to 43,624,810 
kilograms (96,176,321 pounds) is established in accordance with section 
103B(a)(5)(F) of the Agricultural Act of 1949, as amended (1949 Act). 
This quota is established under Proclamation 6301 of June 7, 1991, and 
is referenced as the Secretary of Agriculture's Special Cotton Quota 
Announcement Number 13, chapter 99, subchapter III, subheading 
9903.52.13 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS).

DATES: The quota was established on November 29, 1995, and applies to 
upland cotton purchased not later than February 26, 1996 (90 days from 
the date the quota was established) and entered into the United States 
not later than May 26, 1996 (180 days from the date the quota was 
established).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Janise Zygmont, Farm Service Agency, 
United States Department of Agriculture, room 3756-S, PO Box 2415, 
Washington, DC 20013-2415 or call (202) 720-8841.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 1949 Act requires that a special import 
quota be determined and announced immediately if, for any consecutive 
10-week period, the Friday through Thursday average price quotation for 
the lowest-priced U.S. growth, as quoted for Middling 1\3/32\ inch 
cotton, C.I.F. northern Europe, (U.S. Northern Europe price), adjusted 
for the value of any cotton user marketing certificates issued, exceeds 
the Northern Europe price by more than 1.25 cents per pound. This 
condition was met during the consecutive 10-week period that ended 
November 23, 1995. The quota amount is equal to 1 week's consumption of 
upland cotton by domestic mills at the seasonally-adjusted average rate 
of the most recent 3 months for which data are available--July 1995 
through September 1995. The special import quota identifies a quantity 
of imports that is not subject to the over-quota tariff rate of a 
tariff-rate quota. The quota is not divided by staple length or by 
country of origin. The quota does not affect existing tariff rates or 
phytosanitary regulations. The quota does not apply to Extra Long 
Staple cotton.

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1444-2(a) and U.S. Note 6(a), Subchapter 
III, Chapter 99 of the HTS.

    Signed at Washington, DC, on December 22, 1995.
Dan Glickman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-00017 Filed 1-2-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-05-P
EXHIBIT
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C., ss.1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Smartpay Express, Inc. (the
"Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Smartpay Express
Inc.








Date: August
      23, 2010
            By
            /s/
      Jin LiuJin
      LiuVice
      President and Chief Financial
Officer
#### Teeple Farms, Inc., Respondent, v Larry LaValley, Sr., Appellant.

Judgment unanimously vacated on the law without costs, action stayed, and matter remitted to Supreme Court, Wayne County, for further proceedings, in accordance with memorandum: Plaintiff seeks, *inter alia,*a declaration pursuant to RPAPL article 15 that it is the record owner of certain real property described in its complaint. Defendant made a mid trial motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that plaintiff failed properly to join parties who may have an interest in the property. Plaintiff opposed the motion but alternatively requested that, if additional parties were required, the action merely be stayed until such parties could be joined. The court reserved decision but, on completion of the nonjury trial, denied defendant’s motion, and judgment was entered in plaintiff’s favor.

The record demonstrates that heirs and successors to Caroline Hall Purdy hold title to land between the low water marsh of Great Sodus Bay and the subject parcel and may have an interest in the subject parcel. The record also indicates that there are property owners holding title to lands immediately to the east who may have an interest in the subject parcel. Until those parties are joined, neither title to the subject parcel nor plaintiff’s entitlement to the other relief sought in its complaint can properly be determined *(see, Leach v Gary,*54 AD2d 688). Consequently, the judgment must be vacated and the action stayed pending joinder of those parties pursuant to CPLR 1001 and RPAPL 1511 *(see, Alpha Executive Planning Corp. v Alan,*59 AD2d 548). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Wayne County, Parenti, J.— RPAPL art 15.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Green, Lawton, Davis and Lowery, JJ.
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Robert NICHOLSON, Defendant/Appellant.

No. 67641.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Dec. 26, 1995.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Feb. 20, 1996.

Michael K. Mullen, Charles M. Shaw Law Firm, Clayton, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Breck K. Burgess, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and DOWD, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the judgment of conviction in this court-tried case of unlawful possession of a concealable firearm, § 571.070, RSMo 1986, and third degree assault, § 565.070, RSMo 1986. The trial court sentenced defendant as a prior and persistent offender to concurrent terms of five years for unlawful possession of a concealable firearm and fifteen days for assault. § 558.016, RSMo 1986. We affirm.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b).
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FSP Galleria North Corp. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, George J. Carter, President and principal executive officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to his knowledge:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










Date:  August 12, 2010
/s/ George J. CarterGeorge J. CarterPresident

(Principal Executive Officer)
February 27, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

THE ESTATE OF MARGARET KLOVENSKI, JAKE KLOVENSKI, AND 

MARY HASSLER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIENDS, Appellants

NO. 14-13-00850-CV V.

DR. ASHISH KAPOOR, Appellee

________________________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the 

judgment signed by the court below on June 19, 2013. Having considered the 

motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellants, The Estate of Margaret Klovenski, Jake Klovenski, and Mary Hassler, 

Individually and as next Friends, jointly and severally.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 105 (Thursday, June 3, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 29791]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-11640]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Neurological Disorders 
and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel; NINDS Special Review Group 
Contracts.
    Date: June 25, 2021.
    Time: 10:30 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Marilyn Moore-Hoon, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, 
Rockville, MD 20852, 301-827-9087, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c6aba9a9b4a3aba7b486aba7afaae8a8afaee8a1a9b0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="305d5f5f42555d5142705d51595c1e5e59581e575f46">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, 
Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, 
Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 27, 2021.
Tyeshia M. Roberson,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-11640 Filed 6-2-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officers of  Bioforce Nanosciences Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify, to the best of their knowledge, that:



1.     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2018 (the "Report") of the Company complies in all material respects with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |                                                           
|-------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------
|                     |                                                           
|Dated:  May 11, 2018 | /s/Merle Ferguson
Merle Ferguson
Chief  Executive  Officer
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 0 2

- 00 683

- CV

Heather Alford Bell , Appellant

v. Bobby Jack Bell , Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY, 51ST

JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. A

- 96

- 0418

- F , HONORABLE RAE LEIFESTE , JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On October 12, 2002, appellant Heather Bell filed a notice of appeal stating that she was appealing the district court = s order modifying the parent

- child relationship signed on July 26, 2002. The notice of appeal al

so states that the district court made findings of fact and conclusions of law on September
19, 2002. The clerk =

s and reporter =

s records were due to be filed in this Court in Nove mber 2002. On
March 3, 2003, this Court = s clerk = s office sent notices requesting the status of the clerk = s and reporter =

s records which were overdue as well as the status of the appellate fees which were unpaid. No response

has been received.

On April 10, 2003, this Court sent a letter to the parties requesting a status report regarding this appeal. The letter informed the parties that neither a clerk = s record nor a reporter =

s record from the2

underlying district court cause had been filed in this Court and further that the appellate fees remained unpaid. Further, the letter provided appellant and any other party desiring to continue the appeal an opportunity to respond to the letter by Friday, April 25, 2003, and show why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

To date, no response has been filed, the appellate fees remain unpaid and neither a clerk = s record nor a reporter =

s record has been filed in this Court from the underlying district court cause. We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

Mack Kidd, Justice
Before Justices Kidd, Yeakel and Patterson

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: May 15, 2003
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Samuel Roldan, Appellant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Edward McLaughlin, J.), rendered September 28, 1988, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of *117criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree (Penal Law § 220.43) and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 15 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

The court did not commit error in failing to charge that cocaine found in the parking lot had to be proved to have been the cocaine offered for sale in the apartment of the undercover officer. The evidence herein, sale of narcotics to the officer in the apartment, and his subsequent testing of the bag of cocaine, which exceeded two ounces, was sufficient to establish defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Penal Law § 220.43 requires the sale of a narcotic drug of two or more ounces and does not require any element specifying the location of the drugs. The quantity of cocaine recovered in the parking lot was evidence, not an element of the crime.

The court’s instruction on reasonable doubt, which properly directed the jury’s attention to each element of the crime, was not improper. Nor was it error to permit introduction into evidence of certain of defendant’s records which purported to relate to numerous drug sales. This evidence was probative to counter defendant’s strategy of denying participation in a drug business, of claiming that he had been set up, and of attempting to distance his apartment, where the sale and arrest occurred, from a kilo of cocaine found outside of his window. *(See generally, People v Alvino,*71 NY2d 233, 241-242 [1987]; *People v Satiro,*72 NY2d 821 [1988].) Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Carro, Asch, Kassal and Smith, JJ.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Immureboost, Inc (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tony Jimenez, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  Date August 19, 2008   /s/ Tony Jimenez Name: Tony Jimenez Title: Chief Financial Officer Chief Executive Officer