alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 68 (Monday, April 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18092-18093]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8669]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-224-000]


ANR Pipeline Co.; Notice of Request for Waiver

April 4, 1995.
    Take notice that on March 31, 1995, ANR Pipeline Company (ANR) 
requested a waiver of Section 31(c) of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second 
Revised Volume No. 1, which requires it place into effect a ``Deferred 
Transportation Cost Adjustment'' to be effective May 1, 1995.
    ANR states that as originally contemplated, the ``Deferred 
Transportation Cost Adjustment'' was intended to track ANR's Account 
No. 858 costs over the prior annual period. However, as a result of 
orders issued in Docket No. RP94-43-000, the tracker did not go into 
effect until January 9, 1995. Therefore, ANR states that pursuant to 
its tariff, an adjustment for this short period would reflect actual 
cost experience only for the partial month of January 1995. The 
remainder of the ``Deferred Transportation Costs'' for the months of 
February through April, 1995, would be based on estimates.
    ANR states that if the ``Deferred Transportation Cost Adjustment'' 
were to go into effect on May 1, 1995, based on ANR's estimates, the 
charge would result in a rate adjustment to the Mainline Area Access 
rate of $.0018 when expressed at a 100% load factor. Other 
transportation related services reflect similar rate adjustments. 
Rather than implement an adjustment based primarily on estimates, and 
make further adjustments to reflect actual experience in subsequent 
Deferred Transportation Cost Adjustment filings, [[Page 18093]] ANR has 
proposed to defer the reconciliation for this short period until ANR's 
next annual filing when actual costs during this period will be known.
    ANR states that all of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume 
No. 1 customers and interested State Commissions have been mailed a 
copy of this filing.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, NE., Washington, DC. 
20426 in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions 
or protests should be filed on or before April 11, 1995. Protests will 
be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action 
to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this application are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-8669 Filed 4-7-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<PAGE>

                                                                EXHIBIT NO. 23.4

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
33-96119 of Weekly Reader Corporation. on Form S-4 of our report dated March 7,
2003, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Weekly Reader
Corporation as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002 (which report
expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs relating to
the Company's change it its method of accounting for goodwill and other long
lived intangible assets and relating to the application of procedures relating
to certain disclosures of financial statement amounts related to the 2000 and
2001 consolidated financial statements that were audited by other auditors who
have ceased operations and for which we have expressed no opinion or other form
of assurance other than with respect to such disclosures appearing in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Weekly Reader Corporation for the year ended
December 31, 2002.

Deloitte & Touche LLP

New York, New York
March 28, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 78 (Monday, April 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20116-20117]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9995]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Information Collections Under Review

    The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has been sent the 
following collection(s) of information proposals for review under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 USC chapter 35) and the 
Paperwork Reduction Reauthorization Act since the last list was 
published. Entries are grouped into submission categories, with each 
entry containing the following information:
    (1) The title of the form/collection; [[Page 20117]] 
    (2) The agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of 
the Department sponsoring the collection.
    (3) Who will be asked or required to respond, as well as a brief 
abstract;
    (4) An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount 
of time estimated for an average respondent to respond;
    (5) An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated 
with the collection; and,
    (6) An indication as to whether Section 3504(h) of Public Law 96-
511 applies.
    Comments and/or suggestions regarding the item(s) contained in this 
notice, especially regarding the estimated public burden and associated 
response time, should be directed to the OMB reviewer, Mr. Jeff Hill on 
(202) 395-7340 and to the Department of Justice's Clearance Officer, 
Mr. Robert B. Briggs, on (202) 514-4319. If you anticipate commenting 
on a form/collection, but find that time to prepare such comments will 
prevent you from prompt submission, you should notify the OMB reviewer 
and the Department of Justice Clearance Officer of your intent as soon 
as possible. Written comments regarding the burden estimate or any 
other aspect of the collection may be submitted to Office of 
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 
Washington, DC 20503, and to Mr. Robert B. Briggs, Department of 
Justice Clearance Officer, Systems Policy Staff/Information Resources 
Management/Justice Management Division Suite 850, WCTR, Washington, DC 
20530.

Extension of a Currently Approved Collection

    (1) Application for Nonresident Alien's Mexican Border Crossing 
Card
    (2) Form I-190. Immigration and Naturalization Service, United 
States Department of Justice.
    (3) Primary=Individuals or households. Others=None. This form will 
be used to obtain data from an applicant for a Mexican Border Crossing 
Card, I-186 and I-586. Data is used to determine eligibility of 
applicant.
    (4) 230,000 annual respondents at .083 hours per response.
    (5) 19,090 annual burden hours.
    (6) Not applicable under Section 3504(h) of Public Law 96-511.
    Public comment on this item is encouraged.

    Dated: April 18, 1995.
Robert B. Briggs,
Department Clearance Officer, United States Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 95-9995 Filed 4-21-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-10-M
#### Alan PULLMAN, Individually and d/b/a Ash Development Corp., Appellant, v. BRILL, BROOKS, POWELL & YOUNT, Appellee.

No. C14-87-468-CV.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.).

Dec. 22, 1988.

Wendell S. Loomis, Steven T. Roper, Houston, for appellant.

*506Randall C. Elkins, Candice E. Sayre, Houston, for appellee.

Before JUNELL, SEARS and CANNON, JJ.

OPINION

CANNON, Justice.

On November 23, 1988, we held that if appellee, Brill, Brooks, Powell and Yount, filed a remittitur of *$5,000*the judgment would be affirmed as modified.

The suggested remittitur has been filed. Therefore, the judgment of the trial court is modified by deducting $5,000 from the $10,000 awarded to appellees under special issue 7(d) for legal fees if application for writ of error is granted by the Texas Supreme Court.

The judgment in favor of appellees is otherwise affirmed.

See also, 766 S.W.2d 527.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 109 (Wednesday, June 9, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 30603]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-12083]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than July 9, 2021.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Holly A. Rieser, Manager) 
P.O. Box 442, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034. Comments can also be sent 
electronically to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#edae8280808883999ec38c9d9d81848e8c998482839ead9e99819ec38b9f8fc3829f8a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="74371b1919111a00075a150404181d1715001d1b1a0734070018075a1206165a1b0613">[email protected]</span></a>:
    1. First State Capital Corporation, Holly Springs, Mississippi; to 
merge with M&F Bancorp, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire Merchant 
and Farmers Bank, both of Holly Springs, Mississippi.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 4, 2021.
Ann Misback,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2021-12083 Filed 6-8-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 48 (Monday, March 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 13441]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6056]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health


Division of Research Grants; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
Division of Research Grants Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meetings:

Purpose/Agenda

    To review individual grant applications.

    Name of SEP: Clinical Sciences.
    Date: March 29, 1995.
    Time: 1 p.m.
    Place: NIH, Westwood Building, Room 352, Telephone Conference.
    Contact Person: Dr. Gertrude McFarland, Scientific Review 
Admin., 5333 Westbard Ave., Room 352, Bethesda, MD 20892; (301) 594-
7080.

    Name of SEP: Microbiological and Immunological Sciences.
    Date: April 11, 1995.
    Time: 2 p.m.
    Place: NIH, Westwood Building, Room 226, Telephone Conference.
    Contact Person: Dr. Gerald Liddel, Scientific Review 
Administrator, 5333 Westbard Ave., Room 226, Bethesda, MD 20892; 
(301) 594-7167.

    Name of SEP: Microbiological and Immunological Sciences.
    Date: April 12, 1995.
    Time: 1 p.m.
    Place: NIH, Westwood Building, Room 226, Telephone Conference.
    Contact Person: Dr. Gerald Liddel, Scientific Review 
Administrator, 5333 Westbard Ave., Room 226, Bethesda, MD 20892; 
(301) 594-7167.

    The meetings will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. Applications 
and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable material and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the applications 
and/or proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations imposed by 
the grant review cycle.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 3, 1995.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 95-6056 Filed 3-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 75 (Wednesday, April 19, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 19579]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9601]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-145-000]


Northwest Pipeline Corp.; Technical Conference

April 13, 1995.
    In the order issued on March 1, 1995, in this docket, the 
Commission directed staff to convene a technical conference to address 
the concerns raised by the protests to the filing.
    Take notice that the conference has been scheduled for Tuesday, 
April 25, 1995, at 9 a.m., in a room to be designated at the offices of 
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 810 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-9601 Filed 4-18-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**Exhibit
        23.1**
 
 
 **Consent
        of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**
 
 
 
 The
        Board
        of Directors
 Firstwave
        Technologies, Inc.
 Atlanta,
        Georgia
 
  We
        consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form
        S-8
        (No.s 333-112625 and 333-131631) of Firstwave Technologies, Inc. of our report
        dated March 27, 2006, related to the audits of the consolidated financial
        statements of Firstwave Technologies, Inc. as of December 31, 2005 and 2004,
        and
        for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2005, included
        herein.
  /s/
        Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P.
  Atlanta,
        Georgia
 March
        27,
        2006
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

RODERICK MORRISON,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

No. 08-13-00319-CR

Appeal from the

Criminal District Court No.6 

of Dallas County, Texas 

(TC# F-11-56210-X) 

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the judgment of 

conviction should be modified to reflect that Appellant was found guilty of the offense of murder 

in violation of Section 19.02 of the Texas Penal Code.

We therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court as modified. This decision shall be 

certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 4TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2015.

STEVEN L. HUGHES, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5574 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5574

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the dollar 
threshold applicable to information reporting with respect to payments 
                for qualified natural disaster expenses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 19, 2023

 Ms. Pettersen (for herself and Mr. LaMalfa) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the dollar 
threshold applicable to information reporting with respect to payments 
                for qualified natural disaster expenses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Natural Disaster Property Protection 
Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN THRESHOLD REQUIRING INFORMATION REPORTING TO 
              RESPECT TO QUALIFIED NATURAL DISASTER EXPENSES.

    (a) Returns Regarding Payment in Course of Trade or Business.--
Section 6041 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding 
at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(h) Increased Threshold for Qualified Natural Disaster 
Expenses.--
            ``(1) In general.--In the case of a payment for a qualified 
        natural disaster expense, subsection (a) shall be applied by 
        substituting `$5,000' for `$600'.
            ``(2) Qualified natural disaster expense.--For purposes of 
        this subsection, the term `qualified natural disaster expense' 
        means--
                    ``(A) an expense incurred to mitigate the risk 
                posed to real property by natural disasters or extreme 
                weather, or
                    ``(B) an expense incurred to repair damage done to 
                real property by natural disasters or extreme 
                weather.''.
    (b) Returns Regarding Payments of Remuneration for Services.--
Section 6041A of such Code is amended by adding at the end the 
following new subsection:
    ``(g) Increased Threshold for Qualified Natural Disaster 
Expenses.--In the case of a payment for a qualified natural disaster 
expense (as defined in section 6041(h)(2)), subsection (a)(2) shall be 
applied by substituting `$5,000' for `$600'.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to amounts paid or incurred after the date of the enactment of 
this section.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Stanley Leon KEARNEY, Appellant. Stanley Leon KEARNEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. 64097, 67088.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

May 9, 1995.

Gary E. Brotherton, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Cheryl A. Caponegro, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was convicted by a jury trial of first-degree robbery for which he was sentenced to ten years imprisonment. Defendant’s Rule 29.15 motion was denied without an evidentiary hearing. Defendant appeals both the judgment entered upon his conviction and the denial of his 29.15 motion, which appeals have been consolidated. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that Defendant’s claims of error are without merit. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. John WELKER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 62505.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Sept. 7, 1993.

Delores Berman, St. Louis, for defendant-appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Rudolph R. Rhodes, IV, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff-respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, John Welker, appeals from judgments of conviction, after a jury trial, for attempted burglary in the second degree and possession of burglary tools. He was sentenced as a prior and persistent and class X offender to concurrent terms of imprisonment of five years on each count.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgments of conviction are affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION

(pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2007 of Acergy S.A. (the Company) as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) on the date
hereof (the Report) and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Jean P. Cahuzac, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |  |  |                                        
|------------------ |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------
|                   |  | 
|Date: May 30, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Jean P. Cahuzac                    
|                   |  |  |  | Jean P. Cahuzac Chief Executive Officer
#### Lindsey STURGEON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 47466.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Aug. 31, 1993.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Nov. 2, 1993.

Lorry L. Kohrs, Asst. Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City for respondent.

Before BRECKENRIDGE, P.J., and KENNEDY and LOWENSTEIN, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the denial of a Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief, without an evidentiary hearing.

*347The denial of post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
#### Jerry Logan JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION, Respondent.

No. 94-SC-43-KB.

Supreme Court of Kentucky.

June 8, 1995.

*ORDER OF REINSTATEMENT*

Jerry Logan Johnson has applied for reinstatement to the Kentucky Bar Association pursuant to SCR 3.510(2). Having been found to presently possess sufficient professional capabilities and qualifications to actively practice law and to be of good moral character, the applicant is hereby reinstated to the Kentucky Bar Association and the practice of law.

Johnson shall be required to pay the costs of this reinstatement proceeding, in the amount of $888.33.

All concur except LEIBSON, J., not sitting.

ENTERED: June 8, 1995.

/s/ Robert F. Stephens ROBERT F. STEPHENS, Chief Justice