30404 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 8, 2021 / Notices 

1See 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane (R–134a) from the 

People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019– 

2020, 86 FR 7854 (February 2, 2021) (Preliminary 

Results). 

2 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane is sold under a 

number of trade names including Klea 134a and 

Zephex 134a (Mexichem Fluor); Genetron 134a 

(Honeywell); FreonTM 134a, Suva 134a, Dymel 

134a, and Dymel P134a (Chemours); Solkane 134a 

(Solvay); and Forane 134a (Arkema). Generically, 

1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane has been sold as 

Fluorocarbon 134a, R–134a, HFC–134a, HF A–134a, 

Refrigerant 134a, and UN3159. 

3See 1,1,1,2 Tetrafluoroethane (R–134a) from the 

People’s Republic of China: Antidumping Duty 

Order, 82 FR 18422, 18423 (April 19, 2017). 

4See Notice of Discontinuation of Policy to Issue 

Liquidation Instructions After 15 Days in 

Applicable Antidumping and Countervailing Duly 

Administrative Proceedings, 86 FR 3995 (January 

15, 2021). 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of the return/ 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(4). 

Dated: June 1, 2021. 

Scot Fullerton, 

Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2021–11920 Filed 6–7–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–044] 

1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane (R–134a) 

From the People’s Republic of China: 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2019–2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) finds that the sole company 

subject to this administrative review is 

part of the China-wide entity because it 

did not file a separate rate application 

(SRA). The period of review (POR) is 

April 1, 2019, through March 31, 2020. 

DATES: Applicable June 8, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Peter Zukowski, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0189. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On February 2, 2021, Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results of 

this administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on 1,1,1,2- 

Tetrafluoroethane (R–134a) from the 

People’s Republic of China (China) and 

invited interested parties to comment.1

We received no comments from 

interested parties on the Preliminary 

Results. Commerce conducted this 

administrative review in accordance 

with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the order 

is 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane, R–134a, or 

its chemical equivalent, regardless of 

form, type, or purity level. The chemical 

formula for 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane is 

CF3-CH2 F, and the Chemical Abstracts 

Service (CAS) registry number is CAS 

811–97–2.2

Merchandise subject to the order is 

currently classified in the Harmonized 

Tariff Schedule of the United States 

(HTSUS) at subheading 2903.39.2020. 

Although the HTSUS subheading and 

CAS registry number are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the scope is 

dispositive. 

Final Results of Review 

Because we received no comments, 

we made no changes from the 

Preliminary Results. We continue to 

find that Puremann, Inc., the sole 

company subject to this review, did not 

file an SRA and has not demonstrated 

its eligibility for separate rate status and, 

therefore, is part of the China-wide 

entity. In this administrative review, no 

party requested a review of the Chinawide entity, and Commerce did not selfinitiate a review of the China-wide 

entity. Because no review of the Chinawide entity is being conducted, the 

China-wide entity’s entries were not 

subject to the review, and the rate 

applicable to the NME entity was not 

subject to change as a result of this 

review. The China-wide entity rate 

remains 167.02 percent.3

Assessment Rates 

Commerce shall determine, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries in accordance with 

section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.212(b). Because we determined 

that Puremann, Inc. was not eligible for 

a separate rate and is part of the Chinawide entity, we will instruct CBP to 

apply an ad valorem assessment rate of 

167.02 percent to all entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR that were 

exported by Puremann, Inc. 

Consistent with its recent notice,4

Commerce intends to issue assessment 

instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 

days after the date of publication of the 

final results of this review in the 

Federal Register. If a timely summons is 

filed at the U.S. Court of International 

Trade, the assessment instructions will 

direct CBP not to liquidate relevant 

entries until the time for parties to file 

a request for a statutory injunction has 

expired (i.e., within 90 days of 

publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of the final results of 

this administrative review, as provided 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 

For previously investigated or reviewed 

Chinese or non-Chinese exporters that 

received a separate rate in a prior 

segment of this proceeding, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

existing exporter-specific rate; (2) for all 

Chinese exporters of subject 

merchandise that have not been found 

to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash 

deposit rate will be that for the Chinawide entity (i.e., 167.02 percent); and (3) 

for all non-Chinese exporters of subject 

merchandise which have not received 

their own rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be the rate applicable to the Chinese 

exporter that supplied that non-Chinese 

exporter. These deposit requirements, 

when imposed, shall remain in effect 

until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 315.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 8, 2021 / Notices 30405 

1See Certain Walk-Behind Snow Throwers and 

Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of China: 

Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigation, 86 

FR 22022 (April 26, 2021) (Initiation Notice). 

2The petitioner is MTD Products, Inc. 

3See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Countervailing Duty 

Investigation of Certain Walk-Behind Snow 

Throwers and Parts Thereof from the People’s 

Republic of China: Petitioner’s Request to Postpone 

the Preliminary Determination,’’ dated May 28, 

2021. 

4 Id. 

1See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 88 FR 

26931 (May 6, 2020). 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of return/ 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and the terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.213(h) and 351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: June 2, 2021. 

Christian Marsh, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2021–11997 Filed 6–7–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–570–142] 

Certain Walk-Behind Snow Throwers 

and Parts Thereof From the People’s 

Republic of China: Postponement of 

Preliminary Determination in the 

Countervailing Duty Investigation 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Applicable June 8, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kate 

Sliney or Alex Cipolla at (202) 482–0324 

or (202) 482–4956, respectively, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On April 19, 2021, the Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) initiated a 

countervailing duty (CVD) investigation 

of imports of certain walk-behind snow 

throwers and parts thereof (snow 

throwers) from the People’s Republic of 

China (China).1 Currently, the 

preliminary determination is due no 

later than June 23, 2021. 

Postponement of Preliminary 

Determination 

Section 703(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act), requires 

Commerce to issue the preliminary 

determination in a countervailing duty 

investigation within 65 days after the 

date on which Commerce initiated the 

investigation. However, section 

703(c)(1) of the Act permits Commerce 

to postpone the preliminary 

determination until no later than 130 

days after the date on which Commerce 

initiated the investigation if: (A) The 

petitioner 2 makes a timely request for a 

postponement; or (B) Commerce 

concludes that the parties concerned are 

cooperating, that the investigation is 

extraordinarily complicated, and that 

additional time is necessary to make a 

preliminary determination. Under 19 

CFR 351.205(e), the petitioner must 

submit a request for postponement 25 

days or more before the scheduled date 

of the preliminary determination and 

must state the reasons for the request. 

Commerce will grant the request unless 

it finds compelling reasons to deny the 

request. 

On May 28, 2021, the petitioner 

submitted a timely request that 

Commerce postpone the preliminary 

CVD determination.3 The petitioner 

stated that it requests postponement 

‘‘{t}o permit a thorough investigation 

and the calculation of the most accurate 

countervailing rates.’’ 4

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.205(e), the petitioner has stated the 

reasons for requesting a postponement 

of the preliminary determination, and 

Commerce finds no compelling reason 

to deny the request. Therefore, in 

accordance with section 703(c)(1)(A) of 

the Act, Commerce is postponing the 

deadline for the preliminary 

determination to no later than 130 days 

after the date on which this 

investigation was initiated, i.e., August 

27, 2021. Pursuant to section 705(a)(1) 

of the Act and 19 CFR 351.210(b)(1), the 

deadline for the final determination of 

this investigation will continue to be 75 

days after the date of the preliminary 

determination. 

This notice is issued and published 

pursuant to section 703(c)(2) of the Act 

and 19 CFR 351.205(f)(1). 

Dated: June 2, 2021. 

Christian Marsh, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2021–11952 Filed 6–7–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–549–502] 

Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes 

and Tubes From Thailand: Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and Preliminary 

Determination of No Shipments; 2019– 

2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) preliminarily finds that 

Saha Thai Steel Pipe Public Co., Ltd. 

(Saha Thai), and 26 non-examined 

companies, made sales of subject 

merchandise at less than normal value 

during the period of review (POR) 

March 1, 2019, through February 29, 

2020. We further preliminarily 

determine that Blue Pipe Steel Center 

(Blue Pipe) and K Line Logistics 

(Thailand) Ltd. (K-Line) had no 

shipments during the POR. We invite 

interested parties to comment on these 

preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable June 8, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

William Langley or Thomas Schauer, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office I, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3861 or 

(202) 482–0410, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

In accordance with section 751(a)(2) 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(the Act), Commerce is conducting an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on circular 

welded carbon steel pipes and tubes 

(pipes and tubes) from Thailand. On 

May 6, 2020, in accordance with 19 CFR 

251.221(c)(1)(i), we initiated the 

administrative review of the order 1 on 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES