Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 82 / Friday, April 26, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 18499

$.01 par common

Pittsburgh Home Financial Corporation

$.01 par common

Platinum Entertainment, Inc.

$.001 par common

Powercerv Corporation

$.001 par common

Praegitzer Industries, Inc.

No par common

Preferred Networks, Inc.

$.01 par common

Premiere Radio Networks, Inc.

Class A, $.01 par common

Premiere Technologies, Inc.

$.01 par common

Prism Solutions, Inc.

$.001 par common

Profit Recovery Group International,

Inc., The

No par common

PTI Holding, Inc.

$.01 par common

Pudgie’s Chicken, Inc.

$.01 par common

Q–MED, Inc.

$.001 par common

Q–ZAR, Inc.

No par common

RAC Financial Group, Inc.

$.01 par common

Raptor Systems, Inc.

$1.00 par common

Realco Inc.

No par common

Warrants (expire 02–01–2001)

Red Brick Systems, Inc.

$.01 par common

Remec Inc.

$.01 par common

Renal Care Group, Inc.

$.01 par common

Resource Bank (California)

$3.00 par common

Restor Industries, Inc.

$.01 par common

Ribozyme Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

$.01 par common

Riscorp, Inc.

Class A, $.01 par common

Rural Cellular Corporation

Class A, $.01 par common

Sage Laboratories, Inc.

$.10 par common

Sapient Corporation

$.01 par common

Savings Bank of the Finger Lakes, FSB

(New York)

$.01 par common

SCB Computer Technology, Inc.

$.01 par common

Segue Software, Inc.

No par common

Sel-Lab Marketing, Inc.

Warrants (expire 07–13–99)

Semiconductor Packaging Materials

Company

$.10 par common

Silicon Valley Research, Inc.

No par common

Silver Diner Development, Inc.

$.0007 par common

Sipex Corporation

$.01 par common

SJS Bancorp, Inc. (Missouri)

$.01 par common

Softquad International, Inc.

No par common

Sonics & Materials, Inc.

$.03 par common

Warrants (expire 02–27–2001)

Station Casinos, Inc.

7% convertible preferred

Sunbase Asia, Inc.

$.01 par common

Supergen, Inc.

$.001 par common

Warrants (expire 03–12–2001)

Superior National Insurance Group, Inc.

No par common

Superior Services, Inc.

$.01 par common

Tadiran Telecommunications, Limited

Ordinary Shares (NIS 1.00)

Telechips Corporation

$.01 par common

Telemundo Group, Inc.

Warrants (expire 12–29–99)

Trescom International, Inc.

$.01 par common

Trident International, Inc.

$.01 par common

Ultradata Corporation

$.001 par common

Ultrafem, Inc.

$.001 par common

Unidigital, Inc.

$.01 par common

United States Satellite Broadcasting

Company, Inc. Class A,

$.0001 par common

Videolan Technologies, Inc.

$.01 par common

Warrants (expire 08–10–2000)

Vista 2000, Inc.

Warrants (expire 10–24–98)

Vitalcom, Inc.

$.01 par common

Vocaltec, Limited Ordinary Shares

Voice Control Systems, Inc.

$.01 par common

West Jersey Bancshares, Inc.

No par common

Wilmar Industries, Inc.

No par common

Winfield Capital Corporation

$.01 par common

Workgroup Technology Corporation

$.01 par common

Worldtalk Communications Corporation

$.01 par common

Xeikon, N.V.

American Depository Receipts

Xetel Corporation

$.0001 par common

Xylan Corporation

$.001 par common

Yahoo! Inc.

$.001 par common

York Group, Inc., The

$.01 par common

Deletions From The List Of Foreign

Margin Stocks

Higashi-Nippon Bank, Ltd.

¥ 50 par common

Hyogo Bank, Ltd.

¥ 50 par common

Taisei Prefab Construction Co., Ltd.

¥ 50 par common

Additions To The List Of Foreign

Margin Stocks

New World Development Co., Ltd.

Ordinary, par HK $1.00

Peregrine Investment Holdings Ltd.

Ordinary, par HK $.60

By order of the Board of Governors of

the Federal Reserve System, acting by

its Director of the Division of Banking

Supervision and Regulation pursuant to

delegated authority (12 CFR

265.7(f)(10)), April 23, 1996.

William W. Wiles,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 96–10367 Filed 4–25–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army

Corps of Engineers

36 CFR Part 327

Shoreline Management at Civil Works

Project

AGENCY: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,

DoD.

ACTION: Final rule; technical revision to

correct authority citation.

SUMMARY: The final rule on shoreline

management, published on August 10,

1990, erroneously failed to include 16

U.S.C. 460d and 460l–6a as an authority

for the regulation. (55 FR 30690, dated

July 27, 1990) This revision will add the

proper citation of statutory authority for

Part 327. This revision will have no

regulatory or economic impact, nor

would it alter the present rights or

responsibilities of the general public.

DATES: April 26, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Office of the Chief of

Engineers, ATTN: CECW–ON, 20

Massachusetts Avenue, NW,

Washington, DC 20314–1000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

George Tabb, telephone: (202)–761–

1791.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

purpose and effect of this revision is to

incorporate authority that was

erroneously left out when this

regulation was published in the Federal

Register in 1990.
18500 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 82 / Friday, April 26, 1996 / Rules and Regulations

List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 327

Public lands, Water Resources,

Natural Resources, Resource

Management.

The authority citation for part 327 is

revised to read as follows:

Authority: The Rivers and Harbors Act of

1894, as amended and supplemented (33

U.S.C. 1); 16 U.S.C. 460d and 460l–6a.

George D. Showalter,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 96–10337 Filed 4–25–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710–92–M

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[OAQPS #CA163–1–7251; FRL–5452–6]

Approval and Promulgation of

Implementation Plans; California State

Implementation Plan Revision, San

Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution

Control District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: EPA is finalizing the approval

of a revision to the San Joaquin Valley

portion of the California State

Implementation Plan (SIP) that was

proposed in the Federal Register on

November 1, 1995. The revision

concerns Rule 2530 from the San

Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution

Control District. This approval action

will incorporate this rule into the

federally-approved SIP. EPA is also

finalizing its approval of Rule 2530

under section 112(l) of the Clean Air Act

for the control of hazardous air

pollutants.

EFFECTIVE DATE: This action is effective

on May 28, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Copies of Rule 2530 and

EPA’s technical support document

including response to comments on the

proposed approval are available for

public inspection at EPA’s Region IX

office during normal business hours.

Copies of the submitted rule revisions

are available for inspection at the

following locations: Operating Permits

Section, A–5–2, Air and Toxics

Division, U.S. EPA-Region IX, 75

Hawthorne Street, San Francisco,

California 94105.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Frances Wicher, Operating Permits

Section, A–5–2, Air and Toxics

Division, U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency, Region IX, 75 Hawthorne

Street, San Francisco, CA 94105,

Telephone: (415) 744–1250.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

On November 1, 1995 at 60 FR 55516,

EPA proposed to approve Rule 2530

Federally Enforceable Potential to Emit

of the San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD

(San Joaquin Valley or District) as a

revision to the California SIP and under

section 112(l) of the Clean Air Act (Act).

Approval of Rule 2530 was proposed in

the same notice that EPA proposed

interim approval of the District’s title V

operating permits program. Rule 2530

was adopted by the District on June 15,

1995 and submitted by the California

Air Resources Board on October 24,

1995.

Once approved into the SIP and under

section 112(l), Rule 2530 will create

federally-enforceable limits on potential

to emit for sources with actual

emissions less than 50 percent of any

applicable major source threshold

including hazardous air pollutant

thresholds. A detailed discussion of the

background for Rule 2530 is provided in

the Federal Register notice cited above.

EPA has evaluated this rule for

consistency with the requirements of

the Act and EPA regulations as well as

EPA’s interpretation of these

requirements as expressed in the

various EPA policy guidance documents

referenced in the proposal cited above.

EPA has found that the rule meets the

applicable EPA requirements. A

detailed discussion of the rule has been

provided in technical support document

(TSD) available at EPA’s Region IX

office.

Response to Public Comments

EPA received identical comments on

its proposed approval of Rule 2530 from

two separate commenters. Both Chevron

and Western States Petroleum

Association requested that EPA include

an interim approval issue for correcting

the applicable emission levels in Rule

2530 to include provisions for areas that

receive a Clean Air Act section 182(f)

nitrogen oxides (NOX) opt-out approval.

Rule 2530 is being approved into the

San Joaquin Valley portion of the

California SIP under section 110(k) of

the Act. Section 110(k) provides that

EPA may either approve, disapprove, or

conditionally approve a SIP revision.

Conditional approvals are limited to

situations where the State has adopted

and submitted a commitment to adopt

specific enforceable measures by a date

certain. Interim approval is an approval

option that is limited to actions under

title V of the Act and is not available for

SIP or section 112(l) approvals;

therefore, EPA is not able to create an

interim approval issue for Rule 2530.

It should be noted that, from an

approval standpoint, there is no error in

Rule 2530’s NOX limits. Should EPA

grant the NOX waiver that raises the

major source threshold for NOX sources

to 100 tons per year, Rule 2530’s NOX

limits would merely be more stringent

(at 25 tons per year (tpy) rather than 50

tpy) than strictly necessary. If a NOX

waiver is granted, San Joaquin may

submit a revision to Rule 2530 to raise

the NOX limits.

EPA Action

EPA is finalizing approval of Rule

2530 under section 110(k)(3) of the Act

for inclusion into the California SIP and

under section 112(l) of the Act for the

control of hazardous air pollutants.

Nothing in this action should be

construed as permitting or allowing or

establishing a precedent for any future

request for revision to any state

implementation plan or for approval

under 112(l). Each request for a SIP

revision or an approval under section

112(l) shall be considered separately in

light of specific technical, economic,

and environmental factors and in

relation to relevant statutory and

regulatory requirements.

Unfunded Mandates

Under Sections 202, 203, and 205 of

the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of

1995 (‘‘Unfunded Mandates Act’’),

signed into law on March 22, 1995, EPA

must undertake various actions in

association with proposed or final rules

that include a Federal mandate that may

result in estimated costs of $100 million

or more to the private sector or to State,

local, or tribal governments in the

aggregate.

The District has voluntarily elected to

adopt Rule 2530 and submit it to EPA

for approval. This rule may bind the

District to perform certain actions and

also require the private sector to

perform certain duties. The rule being

approved by this action will impose no

new requirements because affected

sources are already subject to these

regulations under State law. Therefore,

no additional costs to State, local, or

tribal governments or to the private

sector result from this action. EPA has

also determined that this final action

does not include a mandate that may

result in estimated costs of $100 million

or more to State, local, or tribal

governments in the aggregate or to the

private sector.

This action has been classified as a

Table 3 action for signature by the

Regional Administrator under the

procedures published in the Federal

Register on January 19, 1989 (54 FR

2214–2225), as revised by a July 10,