alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed July 8, 2014.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-14-00603-CR

TRENT ALLEN HACKNEY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F13-71353-Q

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Fillmore, Evans, and Lewis

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellant’s counsel has approved the 

motion. The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS that the appeal be DISMISSED and 

this decision be certified below for observance. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a).

PER CURIAM

Do Not Publish

TEX. R. APP. P. 47

140603F.U05
Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

TRENT ALLEN HACKNEY, Appellant

No. 05-14-00603-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F13-71353-Q.

Opinion delivered per curiam before Justices 

Fillmore, Evans, and Lewis.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

Judgment entered this 8th day of July, 2014.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 81 (Thursday, April 25, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 18373]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10150]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Missouri Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of 
the Missouri Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 6:00 
p.m. and adjourn at 8:30 p.m. on May 30, 1996, at the Hyatt Regency 
Hotel, 2345 McGee Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64108. The purpose of 
the meeting is to plan future projects and hold orientation for new 
members.
    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation 
to the Committee, should contact Melvin L. Jenkins, Director of the 
Central Regional Office, 913-551-1400 (TDD 913-551-1414). Hearing-
impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require the services 
of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at 
least five (5) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, April 17, 1996.
Carol-Lee Hurley,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 96-10150 Filed 4-24-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
Exhibit 16

March 27, 2003

Securities and ExchangeCommission Mail Stop 11-3 450 5th Street, N.W. Washington, D.C.   20549

Dear Sirs/Madams:

We have read the section entitled“Changes in Accountants Item 9(d) of Reg 14A” of NSD Bancorp, Inc’s Proxy Statement dated March 25, 2003, and have the following comments:

| 1.     | We agree with the statements made in the second and third paragraphs.                                      |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                       |
| 2.     | We have no basis on which to agree or disagree with the statements made in the first and fourth paragraph. |

Yours truly,

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Pittsburgh, PA
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
§1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Terry G.
Roussel and Sharon C. Kaiser, do each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Cornerstone
Core Properties REIT, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the three -month period ended June
30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of  Cornerstone Core Properties REIT, Inc.





/s/ TERRY
      G. ROUSSELDate:  August
      13, 2008
            Terry
      G. RousselChief
      Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)





/s/ SHARON
      C. KAISERDate:  August
      13, 2008
            Sharon
      C. KaiserChief
      Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
**EXHIBIT 32.02**

** **

**Section 1350 Certification**

** **

**In connection with this quarterlyreport of ML Winton FuturesAccess LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I, Barbra E. Kocsis, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:**

** **

1. This Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in this Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: May 15, 2009                       |                  |   |
|-----------------------------------------------|-----------------------|--------|
|                                          |                  |   |
| By                                            | /s/  BARBRA E. KOCSIS |   |   |
| Barbra  E. Kocsis                             |                  |   |
| Chief  Financial Officer                      |                  |   |
| (Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer) |                  |   |
|                                               |                       |        |  |

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 0 284 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. INESSA VICTORIA HALL, aka INNA VIKTOROVNA POSTOLNIKOVA, aka NESSA CHRISMAN,

Defendant and Appellant .

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including December 1 6 , 2020 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 9 2020

11/09/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0284
#### Brian TRAUB, Employee/Appellant, v. TRANSWORLD AIRLINES and Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York, Employer-Insurer/Respondents.

No. 63065.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

July 20, 1993.

Morris B. Kessler, Kessler & Kessler, St. Louis, for appellant.

Edward Thomas Liese, Holtkamp, Liese, Hummel & Childress, St. Louis, Leo V. Garvin, Jr., Garvin, Steiner *&*Cavanagh, Clayton, for respondents.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

*ORDER*

Claimant appeals from that portion of the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying Workers’ Compensation benefits for permanent partial disability awarded by the Administrative Law Judge. We affirm. The Commission’s order is supported by substantial and competent evidence on the whole record and no error of law appears; an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1241

LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James E. Gates, 

Magistrate Judge. (7:15-cv-00046-D)

Submitted: September 29, 2016 Decided: October 3, 2016

Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., seeks to appeal the 

magistrate judge’s order denying his request for a hearing and 

for appointment of counsel in his civil action. This court may 

exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 

(2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 

U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial 

Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order

Wilder seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an 

appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we 

deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal 

for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

DISMISSED
AMENDMENT NUMBER 1
                                       to
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

      This AMENDMENT NUMBER 1 ("Amendment") dated June 13, 2007 amends the
Employment Agreement ("Agreement") between BioForce Nanosciences Holdings, Inc.
(the "Company") and Eric Henderson (the "Employee").

      In consideration of the mutual agreements set forth below and other good
and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby
acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

1. All terms of the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect except as
expressly modified in this Amendment. All terms of the Agreement shall apply to
this Amendment, except in the event and to the extent they are expressly
modified herein, in which case the terms of this Amendment shall control. All
capitalized terms used in the Amendment not otherwise defined shall have the
same meaning as in the Agreement.

2. Section 3(a) of the Agreement is amended by deleting the provision in its
entirety and replacing it with the following: "During the Term of this
Agreement, the Employee shall serve as the Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, or in such other executive capacity as may be assigned to the Employee,
and shall perform all duties commensurate with the Employee's position and as
may be assigned to the Employee by the Board of Directors of the Company (the
"Board") or such member or committee of the Board or other person(s) as may be
designated by the Board. The Employee shall report to the Board or such member
or committee of the Board or other person(s) as may be designated by the Board
and shall at all times keep such person or entity promptly and fully informed
(in writing if so requested) of the Employee's conduct and of the business or
affairs of the Company, and provide such explanations of the Employee's conduct
as may be required."

3. Section 4(a) of the Agreement is amended by deleting its first sentence in
its entirety and replacing it with the following: "As compensation in full for
all services to be rendered by the Employee under this Agreement, the Company
shall pay to the Employee a base salary of $200,000 per year, less deductions
and withholdings, which salary shall be paid in twice monthly increments in
arrears or otherwise as in accordance with the Company's normal payroll
procedures and policies."

4. This Amendment shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties
hereto and their respective successors, heirs and assigns.

5. Each party represents and warrants that the person signing this Amendment has
the full and proper authority to do so and has been empowered to make and
execute this Amendment.

<PAGE>

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties caused this Amendment to be executed on
the day and year first written above.

BioForce Nanosciences Holdings, Inc.            Eric Henderson


By: /s/ Kerry M. Frey                           /s/ Eric Henderson
    -----------------                           ------------------
    Kerry M. Frey
    President & Chief Operating Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINLAY FINE
JEWELRY  CORPORATION  FORM 10K AND IS  QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMETNS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         16,631
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  19,147
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    295,265
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               356,759
<PP&E>                                         106,735
<DEPRECIATION>                                 36,620
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 541,403
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          230,036
<BONDS>                                        150,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     152,083
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   541,403
<SALES>                                        863,428
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               863,428
<CGS>                                          421,450
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  421,450
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               379,674
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             25,029
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                37,275
<INCOME-TAX>                                   15,323
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            21,952
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                4,755
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   17,197
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        

</TABLE>
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

SIM L. STANLEY

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee.

No. 4D 1 8

- 2621

[ November 21, 2018 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.85 0 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seven teenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Paul L. Backman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 04

- 008736

- CF

- 10A

.

Sim L. Stanley

, South Bay

, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

T

AYLOR

, D AMOORGIAN and C ONNER , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-20256 Conference Calendar

__________________ BARBARA S. YOUNGS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus RANDOLPH F. WHELESS, in his individual capacity; UNNAMED OTHERS Defendants, and JOHN HUTCHISON, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CA-H-94-4244

- - - - - - - - - - (October 19, 1995) Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and REAVLEY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * IT IS ORDERED that Barbara S. Youngs's motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis (IFP) is DENIED. The appeal lacks arguable merit and is, therefore, frivolous. Howard v. King , 707No. 95-20256 -2- F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. Rule 42.2. Federal district courts have no authority to review final state-court judgments. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman , 460 U.S. 462, 482 (1983). This principle also applies to actions in which the constitutional claims presented in federal court are inextricably intertwined with the validity of the state court's grant or denial of relief. Hale v. Harney , 786 F.2d 688, 691 (5th Cir. 1986). Youngs has also filed a pleading styled "Motion for Extension of Time to filed Appellant's Brief and, Alternatively, Motion For Point of Order." This motion is DENIED as moot. Youngs previously has been warned by this court that she may be sanctioned for filing further frivolous pleadings. Accordingly, Youngs is barred from filing any civil appeal in this court, or any initial pleading in any court which is subject to this court's jurisdiction, without the advance written permission of a judge of the forum court or of this court; the clerk of this court and the clerks of all federal district courts in this Circuit are directed to return to Youngs, unfiled, any attempted submission inconsistent with this bar.
APPEAL DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. Rule 42.2.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5436 

To waive certain requirements for Community Development Block Grant 

amounts used for public services activities to prevent, prepare for, and 

respond to homelessness and emergency rental assistance needs, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 13, 2023 

Mr. ESPAILLAT (for himself, Ms. OCASIO-CORTEZ, Mr. GARCI ́A of Illinois, Ms. 

VELA ́ZQUEZ, Ms. TLAIB, Ms. BUSH, and Mr. BOWMAN) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To waive certain requirements for Community Development 

Block Grant amounts used for public services activities 

to prevent, prepare for, and respond to homelessness 

and emergency rental assistance needs, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Expand Emergency 

5 Housing Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5436 IH

1 SEC. 2. PUBLIC SERVICE EXPENDITURE CAP. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 105 of the Housing and 

3 Community Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5305) 

4 is amended by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(i) WAIVER OF REQUIREMENT.—The requirement 

6 described in subsection (a)(8) shall not apply to amounts 

7 appropriated for fiscal year 2024 used for public services 

8 activities to prevent, prepare for, and respond to homeless9 ness and emergency rental assistance needs.’’. 

10 (b) REVISION OF RULE.—The Secretary of Housing 

11 and Urban Development shall, not later than 90 days after 

12 the date of the enactment of this section, issue a rule that 

13 revises section 570.207 of title 24 of the Code of Federal 

14 Regulations to exclude emergency grant payments made 

15 over a period of up to 6 consecutive months to the provider 

16 of such items or services on behalf of an individual or fam17 ily from the meaning of the term ‘‘income payments’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7181

Omron Management Center of America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Exhibit 4.48

[CONFORMED COPY]

Term Sheet dated the 16th of October 2002

Shareholders maintenance clause

SBS
Broadcasting S.A. hereby represents and warrants that at the 16th October:



hereby
undertakes vis-à-vis the Bank that during the credit arrangement dated the 16th of October 2002, between the Borrower and the Bank, will not,
without the prior written consent of the Bank:



|                       |  |                      
|---------------------- |  | ---------------------
|Place                  |  | Date October 31, 2002
|                       |  |                      
|                       |  |                      
|Signature              |  | Signature            
|                       |  |                      
|ING Bank N.V.          |  | SBS Broadcasting S.A.
|Amsterdam Branch:      |  |                      
|/s/ W.G. van Wijgerden |  | /s/ Erik T. Moe      
|                       |  | Attorney-in-Fact     

5

---

QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32.2

               CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lucas Energy, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the three month period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Malek,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ MALEK BOHSALI
---------------------------------
Malek Bohsali
Chief Financial Officer

February 7, 2008