Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 76 / Thursday, April 20, 1995 / Notices 19719

located in Kearny and Grant Counties,

Kansas.

RUS has concluded that the

environmental impacts from the

proposed project would not be

significant and that the proposed action

is not a major Federal action

significantly affecting the quality of the

human environment. Therefore, the

preparation of an environmental impact

statement is not required.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Lawrence R. Wolfe, Chief,

Environmental Compliance Branch,

Electric Staff Division, room 1246, Ag

Box 1569, South Agriculture Building,

RUS, Washington, DC 20250, telephone

(202) 720–1784.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: RUS, in

accordance with its environmental

policies and procedures, required that

Sunflower prepare a Borrower’s

Environmental Report (BER) reflecting

the potential impacts of the proposed

facilities. The BER, which includes

input from Federal, State and local

agencies and the public, has been

adopted as RUS’ Environmental

Assessment for the project in

accordance with 7 CFR 1794.61. RUS

has concluded that the BER represents

an accurate assessment of the

environmental impacts of the project.

The proposed project should have no

impact on cultural resources,

floodplains, important farmland and

federally listed or proposed for listing

threatened or endangered species or

their critical habitat. The proposed route

may impact wetland areas associated

with the crossing of the Arkansas River.

Sunflower will avoid placing structures

in wetland habitat. RUS has determined

that there is no practicable alternative to

crossing wetland areas associated with

the Arkansas River and the impact to

these areas should be minimal.

The proposed 115 kV transmission

line would extend from the Fletcher

Substation located in Kearny County

south along section lines to the Pioneer

Substation located in Grant County. The

southern portion of the line in Grant

County would be located on existing

right-of-way. The primary structure type

will be wood pole H-frame structures

located on a 100-foot wide right-of-way.

Alternatives considered to the project

included no action, demand side

management, local generation, the

addition of capacitor banks at the

Pioneer Substation, closing the

Cimarron Interconnection with

WestPlains Energy and alternative

routes. RUS has considered these

alternatives and concluded that the

project as proposed meets the needs of

Sunflower to provide adequate service

to its member system, Pioneer Electric

Cooperative, Inc.

Copies of the BER and FONSI are

available for review at RUS at the

address provided herein; or can be

reviewed at or obtained from the offices

of Sunflower, 301 West 13th Street,

Hays, Kansas 67601, telephone (913)

628–2845, during normal business

hours.

Dated: April 13, 1995.

Adam M. Golodner,

Deputy Administrator, Program Operations.

[FR Doc. 95–9732 Filed 4–19–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410–15–M

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Agency Information Collection Under

Review by the Office of Management

and Budget

DOC has submitted to the Office of

Management and Budget (OMB) for

clearance the following proposal for

collection of information under the

provisions of the Paperwork Reduction

Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). An

expedited review has been requested.

Agency: National Telecommunications

and Information Administration

(NTIA).

Title: Reviewer Information Form

Form Number: Agency—None; OMB

Approval Number—None.

Type of Request: New Collection—

Expedited Review Requested.

Burden: 100 hours; 400 responses; Avg.

Hours Per Response is 15 minutes.

Needs and Uses: NTIA will be collecting

administrative information necessary

to select reviewers for the

Telecommunications and Information

Infrastructure Assistance Program

grant application process.

Affected Public: Individuals.

Frequency: Annually.

Obligation: Voluntary.

OMB Desk Officer: Virginia Huth, (202)

395–3785.

A copy of the form is published

below. Other information can be

obtained by calling or writing DOC

Clearance Officer, Gerald Tache ́, (202)

482–3271, Department of Commerce,

Room 5327, 14th and Constitution

Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20230.

Written comments and

recommendations for the proposed

information collection should be sent to

Virginia Huth, OMB Desk Officer, Room

10236, New Executive Office Building,

Washington, D.C. 20503.

Dated: April 13, 1995.

Gerald Tache ́,

Departmental Clearance Officer, Office of

Management and Organization.

TIIAP, NTIA, U.S. Dept. of Commerce—1995

[OMB Approval # ]

Reviewer Information Form

lllllllllllllllllllll

Name

lllllllllllllllllllll

Title

lllllllllllllllllllll

Organization

lllllllllllllllllllll

Dept/Org Unit

lllllllllllllllllllll

Street Address

City llllllllllllllllll

State llllllllllllllllll

ZIP lllllllllllllllllll

lllllllllllllllllllll

FedEx Address (if different)

lllllllllllllllllllll

Telephone (office) (home) FAX

e-mail

lllllllllllllllllllll

Current resume on file with TIIAP? If not,

please enclose.

lllllllllllllllllllll

Where will you be traveling from?

lllllllllllllllllllll

Available dates between May 23 and

September 1, 1995 (Circle all that apply)

May 23–26

May 30–June 2

June 6–9

June 13–16

June 20–23

June 27–30

July 11–14

July 18–21

July 25–28

August 1–4

August 8–11

August 15–18

August 22–25

August 29–Sept. 1

lllllllllllllllllllll

Application Domains (rank your top three

choices, if applicable)

ll Arts & Culture

ll Community Networking

ll Economic Development

ll Health

ll Higher Education

ll Human Services

ll K–12 Education

ll Library Services

ll Public & Govt. Information

ll Public Safety

ll Statewide/Local Infras. Plan

ll Other (indicate what)

Please assist us by identifying any grant

applications with which you are familiar and

that may represent a conflict of interest or the

appearance of a conflict of interest. Use

additional paper as needed.

List of grants:

lllllllllllllllllllll

Admin. Use Only
19720 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 76 / Thursday, April 20, 1995 / Notices

Resume on File lllllllllllll

Panel No. llllllllllllllll

Local llllllllllllllllll

COI on File lllllllllllllll

Domain(s) llllllllllllllll

Travel lllllllllllllllll

Dates Available: lllllllllllll

PO: lllllllllllllllllll

Federal Employee llllllllllll

lllllllllllllllllllll

Public reporting burden for this voluntary

collection of information is estimated to

average fifteen minutes per request,

including the time for reviewing instructions

and completing and reviewing the collection

of information. Send comments regarding

this burden estimate or any other aspect of

this collection of information, including

suggestions for reducing this burden, to

TIIAP, NTIA, Rm 6043, U.S. Dept. of

Commerce, 14 and Constitution Ave NW,

Washington DC 20230 and to the Office of

Management and Budget (OMB), Office of

Information and Regulatory Affairs,

Washington DC 20503 (Attn: NTIA

Paperwork Reduction Desk Officer). Do not

send completed forms to OMB.

[FR Doc. 95–9696 Filed 4–19–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–60–M

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Docket 15–95]

Foreign-Trade Zone 15—Kansas City,

Missouri Area Application for

Expansion

An application has been submitted to

the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the

Board) by the Greater Kansas City

Foreign Trade Zone, Inc., grantee of

Foreign-Trade Zone 15, requesting

authority to expand its zone in the

Kansas City, Missouri area, within the

Kansas City, Missouri, Customs port of

entry. The application was submitted

pursuant to the provisions of the

Foreign-Trade Zones Act, as amended

(19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), and the regulations

of the Board (15 CFR part 400). It was

formally filed on April 14, 1995.

FTZ 15 was approved on March 23,

1973 (Board Order 93, 38 FR 8622, 4/4/

73) and expanded on October 25, 1974

(Board Order 102, 39 FR 39487, 11/7/

74). The zone project includes 3 generalpurpose sites in the Kansas City,

Missouri, port of entry area: Site 1

(250,000 sq. ft.)—Midland International

Corp. warehouse, 1650 North Topping,

Kansas City; Site 2 (2,815,000 sq. ft.)—

Hunt Midwest Real Estate Development,

Inc., surface and underground

warehouse complex, 8300 N.E.

Underground Drive, Kansas City; and,

Site 3 (101,000 sq. ft.)—Kansas City

International Airport, 7,984 sq. ft.

building and 93,016 sq. ft. of land,

12600 N.W. Prairie View Road, Kansas

City.

The applicant is now requesting

authority to further expand the generalpurpose zone to include an additional

site (proposed new Site 4—416 acres) at

the Carefree Industrial Park, a surface

and subsurface business park located at

1600 N M–291 Highway, Sugar Creek,

Missouri. (A portion of the park is also

in the City of Independence.)

No specific manufacturing requests

are being made at this time. Such

requests would be made to the Board on

a case-by-case basis.

In accordance with the Board’s

regulations (as revised, 56 FR 50790–

50808, 10–8–91), a member of the FTZ

Staff has been designated examiner to

investigate the application and report to

the Board.

Public comment on the application is

invited from interested parties.

Submissions (original and 3 copies)

shall be addressed to the Board’s

Executive Secretary at the address

below. The closing period for their

receipt is June 19, 1995. Rebuttal

comments in response to material

submitted during the foregoing period

may be submitted during the subsequent

15-day period (to July 5, 1995).

A copy of the application and

accompanying exhibits will be available

for public inspection at each of the

following locations:

U.S. Department of Commerce District

Office, 601 East 12th Street, Room

635, Kansas City, Missouri 64106

Office of the Executive Secretary,

Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room

3716, U.S. Department of Commerce,

14th and Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,

Washington, DC 20230.

Dated: April 14, 1995.

John J. Da Ponte, Jr.,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–9835 Filed 4–19–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

International Trade Administration

[A–570–808]

Chrome-Plated Lug Nuts From the

People’s Republic of China;

Preliminary Results of Antidumping

Administrative Review

AGENCY: International Trade

Administration/Import Administration.

ACTION: Notice of preliminary results of

the Antidumping Duty Administrative

Review of chrome-plated lug nuts from

the People’s Republic of China.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce

(the Department) is conducting

administrative reviews of the

antidumping duty order on chromeplated lug nuts (lug nuts) from the

People’s Republic of China (PRC) in

response to requests by petitioner,

Consolidated International Automotive,

Inc. (Consolidated), for the first and

second reviews, and an importer,

Krossdale Accessories, Inc., for the

second administrative review. These

reviews cover shipments of this

merchandise to the United States during

the period April 18, 1991, through

August 31, 1992, and September 1,

1992, through August 31, 1993.

We have preliminarily determined

that sales have been made below the

foreign market value (FMV). If these

preliminary results are adopted in our

final results, we will instruct U.S.

Customs to assess antidumping duties

equal to the difference between the

United States price (USP) and FMV.

Interested parties are invited to

comment on these preliminary results.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 20, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Donald Little, Elisabeth Urfer, or

Maureen Flannery, Office of

Antidumping Compliance, Import

Administration, International Trade

Administration, U.S. Department of

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution

Avenue, N.W., Washington D.C. 20230;

telephone (202) 482–4733.

Background

The Department published in the

Federal Register an antidumping duty

order on lug nuts from the PRC on April

24, 1992 (57 FR 15052). On September

11, 1992, and September 7, 1993, the

Department published in the Federal

Register (57 FR 41725 and 58 FR 47116)

notices of opportunity to request

administrative reviews of the

antidumping duty order on lug nuts

from the PRC covering the periods April

18, 1991, through August 31, 1992, (91–

92 review) and September 1, 1992,

through August 31, 1993 (92–93

review).

For the 91–92 review, in accordance

with 19 CFR 353.22(a)(1994), the

petitioner, Consolidated, requested that

we conduct an administrative review of

China National Automotive Industry I/

E Corp.; China National Machinery &

Equipment Import and Export

Corporation, Jiangsu Co., Ltd. (Jiangsu);

Rudong Grease Gun Factory (Rudong);

China National Automotive Industry

Shanghai Automobile Import & Export

Corp. (Shanghai Automobile); Chu Fong

Metallic Industrial Corporation (Chu

Fong); and San Chien Electric Industrial

Works, Ltd. (San Chien). We published

a notice of initiation of this