alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Kenneth W. DIXON, Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent.

No. 65037.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

March 21, 1995.

*308Robert S. Adler, St, Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., James A. Chenault, III, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Mo. Dept, of Revenue, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Dixon appeals from a judgment of the trial court sustaining the Director of Revenue’s suspension of his driving privileges. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. We affirm in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C., ss.1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Smartpay Express, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Smartpay Express Inc.








Date: November 20, 2009
By
/s/ Chunlin ZhangChunlin ZhangVice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### John D. & Lila A. COSBY, Appellants, v. Larry KING, Respondent.

No. 66084.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

May 9, 1995.

William B. Beedie, Farmington, for appellant.

David J. Kueter, Steelville, for respondent.

*ORDER*

John and Lila Cosby appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of Larry King in their action to quiet title by adverse possession.

An opinion reciting the detañed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their in*239formation only. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6939

Integrity Fusion, Inc:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5253 

To direct the Secretary of the Air Force to conduct certain studies relating 

to members of the Air Force assigned to Creech Air Force Base, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 22, 2023 

Ms. LEE of Nevada introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Air Force to conduct certain 

studies relating to members of the Air Force assigned 

to Creech Air Force Base, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Creech Airmen Eco5 nomic Security and Resilience Act of 2023’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5253 IH

1 SEC. 2. FEASIBILITY STUDY REGARDING ASSIGNMENT IN2 CENTIVE PAY FOR MEMBERS OF THE AIR 

3 FORCE ASSIGNED TO CREECH AIR FORCE 

4 BASE. 

5 Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment 

6 of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit 

7 to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and 

8 House of Representatives a report on the feasibility of 

9 paying assignment incentive pay under section 307a of 

10 title 37, United States Code, to members of the Air Force 

11 assigned to Creech Air Force Base. The study shall in12 clude— 

13 (1) an assessment of the financial stress experi14 enced by such members, especially junior members 

15 with families, associated with— 

16 (A) the daily commute to and from the 

17 base; 

18 (B) the unique demands of the mission to 

19 remotely pilot aircraft; and 

20 (C) limited access to essential services, in21 cluding childcare, housing, and readily acces22 sible health care; and 

23 (2) the overall cost to the United States, and fi24 nancial relief provided by, such assignment incentive 

25 pay authorized by the Secretary of the Air Force in 

26 2008 for such members. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 5253 IH

1 SEC. 3. EPIDEMIOLOGICAL CONSULTATION REGARDING 

2 MEMBERS OF THE AIR FORCE ASSIGNED TO 

3 CREECH AIR FORCE BASE. 

4 (a) CONSULTATION.—The Secretary of the Air 

5 Force, in coordination with the Director of the Defense 

6 Health Agency, shall conduct a behavioral health epide7 miological consultation on unique social and occupational 

8 stressors affecting members of the Air Force assigned to 

9 Creech Air Force Base and dependents of such members. 

10 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date 

11 of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit 

12 to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and 

13 House of Representatives a report that includes— 

14 (1) an executive summary of findings from con15 sultation; and 

16 (2) recommendations regarding how to address 

17 key findings to improve the quality of life and resil18 iency of such members and dependents. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
f8k050610ex10viii_sunnyside.htm


Exhibit 10.8


 


 



	
Certificate No.

	
(2007)No.07572


	
User of the Land

	
Jiangsu Danbom Mechanical & Electrical Co., Ltd


	
Location

	
Heping Village, Baohua Town, Jurong City, Jiangsu Province


	
Usage

	
Manufacture


	
Area (sqm)

	
18,026


	
Form of Acquisition

	
By means of transfer


	
Expiration Date

	
07/20/2055












According to "The People's Republic of China Constitution," "The People's Republic of China Land Management Law" and "The People's Republic of China on Urban Real Estate Administration Law" and other laws and regulations, in order to protect the legal interests of the user of this land, we have checked and verified that the land usage rights applied by this user listed on this certificate is correct so we approve the registration of this land usage right and hereby issue this certificate.







                                     Jurong Municipal Government ( Stamp)


                                     Date: May 17, 2007


 




  





1











  






 



	
Certificate No.

	
(2008)No.012379


	
User of the Land

	
Jiangsu Danbom Mechanical & Electrical Co., Ltd


	
Location

	
Heping Village, Baohua Town, Jurong City, Jiangsu Province


	
Usage

	
Manufacture


	
Area (sqm)

	
40,183


	
Form of Acquisition

	
By means of transfer


	
Expiration Date

	
09/02/2058












According to "The People's Republic of China Constitution," "The People's Republic of China Land Management Law" and "The People's Republic of China on Urban Real Estate Administration Law" and other laws and regulations, in order to protect the legal interests of the user of this land, we have checked and verified that the land usage rights applied by this user listed on this certificate is correct so we approve the registration of this land usage right and hereby issue this certificate.







                                     Jurong Municipal Government ( Stamp)


                                     Date: October 30, 2008


 


 


 


2
----

|   | (1)    | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and                          |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                |
|   | (2)    | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |

|                                            |   |
|-------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:      August 14, 2009                      |   |
|                                            |   |
| /s/      Ralph Walther                          |   |
| Ralph      Walther                              |   |
| Vice      President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5617 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5617

 To amend title 51, United States Code, to extend the learning period 
                   for commercial human space flight.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 21, 2023

Mr. McCarthy (for himself, Mr. Lucas, Mr. Babin, Mr. Calvert, Mr. Mike 
    Garcia of California, Mr. Issa, Mr. McCaul, Mr. Moolenaar, Mr. 
Obernolte, Mr. Posey, and Mr. Weber of Texas) introduced the following 
   bill; which was referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and 
                               Technology

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 51, United States Code, to extend the learning period 
                   for commercial human space flight.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Space Transformation And Reliability 
Act'' or the ``STAR Act''.

SEC. 2. LEARNING PERIOD.

    Paragraph (9) of section 50905(c) of title 51, United States Code, 
is amended by striking ``2023'' and inserting ``2031''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT
31.1




CERTIFICATION
OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER




PURSUANT
TO SECTION 302




OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I,
Richard Man Fai Lee, certify that:




1.
              I
      have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
      June 30, 2009 of China Premium Lifestyle Enterprise,
  Inc.





2.
              Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      report.





3.
              Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
      registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
      report.





4.
              The
      registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and have:




a. designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;




b. evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and




c. disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.




5.
              The
      registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
      our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
      to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s
      board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
      functions):








a. all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




b. any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial
reporting.




August
12, 2009




By:
              /s/ Richard Man Fai LeeRichard
      Man Fai LeeChief
      Executive Officer
TEVIN KEYON WATSON

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 13

- 5584

_____________________________/

Opinion filed February 24, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Michael G. Allen , Judge

.

Tevin Keyon Watson, pro se; Jeffrey E. Lewis, General Counsel, and Melissa Joy

Ford, Assistant Regional Conflict Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil

Regional Counsel, Tallahassee , for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee

, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS

, C.J., BENTON and THOMAS

, J J

. , CONCUR.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 73 (Monday, April 17, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 19205-19206]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9415]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 95-38, RM-8587]


Television Broadcasting Services; Kailua, HI

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document requests comments on a petition filed by Paul 
Alfred Tennyson, proposing the allotment of Television Channel 50 to 
Kailua, Hawaii, as that community's first local television service. The 
allotment can be made consistent with the minimum distance separation 
requirements of Section 73.610 of the Commission's Rules. The 
coordinates for the proposed allotment of Channel 50 to Kailua are 
North Latitude 21-24-00 and West Longitude 157-44-30. This proposal is 
not affected by the freeze on television allotments or applications.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before June 1, 1995, and reply 
comments on or before June 16, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, D.C. 20554. 
In addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should 
serve the petitioner, or its counsel or consultant, as follows: Paul 
Alfred Tennyson, 305 Hahani Street, #118, Kailua, Hawaii 96734 
(Petitioner).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy J. Walls, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 95-38, adopted March 28, 
1995, and released April 10, 1995. The full text of this Commission 
decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business 
hours in the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW, 
Washington, D.C. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, International 
Transcription Service, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1919 M Street, NW, Room 
246, or [[Page 19206]] 2100 M Street, NW, Suite 140, Washington, D.C. 
20037.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of l980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Television broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 95-9415 Filed 4-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
Exhibit
32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO
  SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
 In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FSP Galleria North Corp.
(the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned, George J. Carter, President and principal executive officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to his
knowledge:
 
 (1)
              the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 
 Date:  November
      6, 2009
              /s/ George J.
      Carter
                George
      J. Carter
                President
                (Principal
      Executive Officer)
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5334

Arrowhead Electrical Products, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7088

Apergy ESP Systems, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel