alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 105 (Thursday, June 3, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 29810]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-11698]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service\TM\.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: June 3, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
May 19, 2021, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 701 to Competitive Product List. 
Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2021-93, CP2021-
96.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2021-11698 Filed 6-2-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 20, 2015

Order 

November 20, 2015

150364(117)

HELEN YONO,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,

Defendant-Appellant.

SC: 150364

COA: 308968

Ct of Claims: 11-000117-MD

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of amici curiae Michigan County Road 

Commission Self-Insurance Pool and the County Road Association to participate in oral 

argument by sharing seven minutes of defendant-appellant’s allotted time for argument is 

GRANTED.
**EXHIBIT 32**
The following certifications are being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, and are not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company,whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language insuch filing.
**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officers of Peerless Systems Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),hereby certify, to each such officer’s knowledge, that:
(i)  the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the quarter and year endedJanuary 31, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (ii)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.     Dated: May 2, 2005 /s/ Howard J. Nellor        Howard J. Nellor   President and Chief Executive Officer   (Principal Executive Officer)       Dated: May 2, 2005 /s/ William R. Neil       William R. Neil   Chief Financial Officer   (Principal Financial Officer)  
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to PeerlessSystems Corporation and will be retained by Peerless Systems Corporation and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 25


POWER OF ATTORNEY


<PAGE>

POWER OF ATTORNEY

Each person whose signature appears below hereby authorizes Terry L. Robinson or
David B. Gaw and  either  of them,  as  attorney-in-fact,  to sign in his or her
behalf,  individually and in each capacity stated below, and to file this Annual
Report on Form 10- K and all  amendments  and/or  supplements  to this file this
Annual Report on Form 10- K

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Signature                                           Title                               Date
---------                                           -----                               ----
<S>                                                 <C>                                 <C>
/s/Thomas N. Gavin
------------------------------------
Thomas N. Gavin                                     Director                            March 23, 2004


/s/David B. Gaw                                     Director and                        March 25, 2004
------------------------------------                Chairman of the Board
David B. Gaw


/s/Fred J. Hearn Jr.
------------------------------------
Fred J. Hearn Jr.                                   Director                            March 26, 2004


/s/Conrad W. Hewitt                                 Director                            March 26, 2004
------------------------------------
Conrad W. Hewitt


/s/Richard S. Long                                  Director                            March 25, 2004
------------------------------------
Richard S. Long


/s/Thomas H. Lowenstein                             Director                            March 26, 2004
------------------------------------
Thomas H. Lowenstein


/s/Thomas F. Malloy                                 Director                            March 26, 2004
------------------------------------
Thomas F. Malloy


/s/Terry L. Robinson                                President, Chief                    March 25, 2004
------------------------------------                Executive Officer and Director
Terry L. Robinson                                   (Principal Executive Officer)


/s/James E. Tidgewell                               Director                            March 26, 2004
------------------------------------
James E. Tidgewell


/s/Lee-Ann Cimino                                   Sr. Vice President                  March 25, 2004
------------------------------------                Chief Financial Officer
Lee-Ann Cimino                                      (Principal Financial Officer)
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5264 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5264

   To incentivize States to provide robust qualified immunity to law 
             enforcement officers, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 22, 2023

  Ms. Tenney (for herself and Mr. Garbarino) introduced the following 
bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in 
     addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To incentivize States to provide robust qualified immunity to law 
             enforcement officers, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Local Law Enforcement Protection 
Act''.

SEC. 2. QUALIFIED IMMUNITY REQUIREMENT FOR RECEIPT OF CERTAIN GRANT 
              FUNDS.

    (a) Requirement.--Beginning in the first fiscal year that begins 
after the date of enactment of this Act, in order to be eligible to 
receive a grant under a covered grant program, a State or unit of local 
government must certify, along with the application for each such 
grant, that the State or unit of local government does not have in 
place a law that provides less qualified immunity to law enforcement 
officers than is described in the holding in Saucier v. Katz (533 U.S. 
194 (2001)).
    (b) Covered Grant Program.--In this section, the term ``covered 
grant program'' means each of the following:
            (1) The Community Development Block Grant Program under 
        title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 
        (42 U.S.C. 5301 et seq.).
            (2) Community facility direct and guaranteed loans under 
        paragraph (1) of section 306(a) of the Consolidated Farm and 
        Rural Development Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Charles F. BENJAMIN, Appellant.

No. 66682.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

Aug. 1, 1995.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Sept. 25, 1995.

Application to Transfer Denied Nov. 21, 1995.

John E. Counts, Fenton, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Becky Owenson Kilpatrick, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before AHRENS, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and GRIMM, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Charles F. Benjamin, appeals the judgment of conviction for the class A felony of murder in the first degree, in violation of § 565.020 RSMo 1994; one count of the class B felony of burglary in the first degree, in violation of § 569.160; one count of the class B felony of kidnapping, in violation of § 565.110; and one count of the class C felony of stealing, in violation of § 570.030.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, set: ting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 76 (Thursday, April 20, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 19807]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9778]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Public Information Collection Requirements Submitted to OMB for 
Review

April 12, 1995.
    The Department of The Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, Public Law 96-511. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20220.

Special Request

    In order to conduct the customer satisfaction survey described 
below in the early-May timeframe, the Department of Treasury is 
requesting Office of Management and Budget (OMB) review and approval of 
this information collection by April 25, 1995. To obtain a copy of this 
survey, please write to the IRS Clearance Officer at the address listed 
below.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

OMB Number: 1545-1349.
Form Number: None.
Type of Review: Revision.
Title: 1995 TAXLINK Customer Satisfaction Survey.
Description: The Small Business Affairs Office and the Submission 
Processing Division of the Internal Revenue Service are interested in 
collecting customer satisfaction data from taxpayers currently enrolled 
in TAXLINK or the electronic federal deposit system. Additionally, the 
North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) included a requirement that 
the U.S. government collect a certain percentage of depository taxes 
electronically. Regulations mandating usage of Electronic Funds 
Transfer (EFT) were issued on July 1, 1994. This survey is scheduled 
for early May to allow for a full quarter of federal tax deposits to be 
made electronically.
Respondents: Business or other for-profit.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 4,000.
Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent:
    Survey Notification Letter--2 minutes.
    Interviews--10 minutes.
    Survey--10 minutes.
Frequency of Response: Other.
Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 634 hours.
Clearance Officer: Garrick Shear, (202) 622-3869, Internal Revenue 
Service, Room 5571, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20224.
OMB Reviewer: Milo Sunderhauf, (202) 395-7340, Office of Management and 
Budget, Room 10226, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 
20503.
Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-9778 Filed 4-19-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
***Exhibit
      32.1***





**Certification** **Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**




Securities
      and Exchange Commission


450
      Fifth
      Street, N.W


Washington,
      D.C. 20549





Ladies
      and Gentlemen:





The
      certification set forth below is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission solely for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule
      15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and with Section 1350 of
      Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.





Jeff
      Oscodar, the President & Chief Executive Officer of ZVUE Corporation (f/k/a
      Handheld Entertainment, Inc.), and Tom Hillman, the Interim Chief Financial
      Officer of ZVUE Corporation, each certifies that:




1.
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




2.
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ZVUE
                Corporation.




**By:
      /s/ JEFF OSCODAR**


Jeff
      Oscodar


President
      & Chief Executive Officer





**By:
      /s/** **TOM
      HILLMAN**


Tom
      Hillman


Interim
      Chief Financial Officer (Interim Principal Financial and Accounting
      Officer).


39
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 106 (Friday, June 4, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 30063]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-11784]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Board of Scientific 
Counselors, National Cancer Institute. The meeting will be closed to 
the public as indicated below in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in section 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended for the review, 
discussion, and evaluation of individual intramural programs and 
projects conducted by the National Cancer Institute, including 
consideration of personnel qualifications and performance, and the 
competence of individual investigators, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Board of Scientific Counselors, National 
Cancer Institute.
    Date: July 12-13, 2021.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate personnel qualifications and 
performance, and competence of individual investigators.
    Place: National Cancer Institute--Shady Grove, 9609 Medical 
Center Drive, Rockville, MD 20850 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Brian E. Wojcik, Ph.D., Senior Review 
Administrator, Institute Review Office, Office of the Director, 
National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 9609 
Medical Center Drive, Room 3W414, Rockville, MD 20850, 240-276-5660, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e0978f8a83898b82a08d81898cce8e8988ce878f96"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a6d1c9ccc5cfcdc4e6cbc7cfca88c8cfce88c1c9d0">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 1, 2021.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-11784 Filed 6-3-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Ex Parte Willie West KING.

No. 72469.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Sept. 11, 1996.

Willie King West, Lovelady, pro se.

Ricky B. Smith, .District Attorney, Lame-sa, Matthew Paul, State’s Attorney, Austin, for State.

*OPINION*

PER CURIAM.

This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus transmitted to this Court pursuant to Article 11.07, V.A.C.C.P. Applicant was convicted of the offense of injury to a child and punishment was assessed at confinement for ten years. No appeal was taken from this conviction.

Applicant contends that he was arrested while on parole on the authority of a parole revocation warrant and that he has been held in excess of 120 days without a parole revocation hearing having been held, as required by Article 42.18, § 14(a), V.A.C.C.P. The trial court did not hold a hearing but corroborated the facts as alleged by Applicant. Applicant is entitled to relief.

*98Article 42.18, § 14(a), supra, states, in pertinent part:

> The panel or designee may hold the hearing at a date later than the date otherwise required by this section if it determines a delay is necessary to assure due process for the person, except that the authority issuing the warrant shall immediately withdraw the warrant if the hearing is not held before the 121st day after the date of the arrest.

In the instant case it is undisputed that more than 120 days have elapsed since Applicant’s arrest.

Therefore, the issuing authority, the Parole Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, is ordered to immediately withdraw the warrant under which Applicant is being held, unless the revocation hearing has been held by the date of this opinion, and to release Applicant without delay.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional and Pardons and Paroles Divisions. No motions for rehearing of this opinion will be entertained.
EXHIBIT 99.1

The following certification  accompanies the issuer's Annual Report on Form 10-K
and is not filed, as provided in Release 33-8212. 34-47551 dated March 21, 2003.


                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In  connection  with the  accompanying  Annual  Report on Form 10-K of North Bay
Bancorp for the year ended  December 31, 2002, I, Terry L.  Robinson,  President
and Chief Executive Officer of North Bay Bancorp,  hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that:

(1) such  Annual  Report on Form 10-K of North Bay  Bancorp  for the year  ended
December 31, 2002,  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in such Annual  Report on Form 10-K of North Bay
Bancorp for the year ended December 31, 2002,  fairly presents,  in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of North Bay
Bancorp.

Dated:  March 24, 2003


                               /s/ Terry L. Robinson
                               ---------------------
                               TERRY L. ROBINSON
                               President and Chief Executive Officer
                               (Principal Executive Officer)


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to North Bay  Bancorp  and will be  retained  by North Bay Bancorp and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff on request upon
request.
#### Agway Insurance Companies, Respondent-Appellant, v Steven B. Williamson, Doing Business as S. B. Williamson Insurance Agency, et al., Appellants, and Knight Agency, Inc., Appellant-Respondent.

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Peter and Cheryl Kaszynski suffered a fire loss on their farm. Their insurer, Agway Insurance Companies (Agway), voluntarily paid them $42,000 in extra coverage they had requested but did not receive because of the alleged failure of one or more of the defendant brokers to secure it. Agway made the payment on the condition that the Kaszynskis assign to Agway their right of recovery against defendants for breach of contract and negligence.

Supreme Court properly granted the motion of defendant Knight Agency, Inc. to substitute Agway as a party plaintiff. Since Agway has completely reimbursed the Kaszynskis for their loss, Agway is the real party in interest in this lawsuit *(see,*71 NY Jur 2d, Insurance, § 1922). CPLR 1004 is no bar to Agway being substituted as the named plaintiff.

Supreme Court also properly denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment, which requested a limitation on damages to the amount of premiums the Kaszynskis would have paid for the additional coverage. Since Agway voluntarily paid the excess coverage, its interest is not so limited, as a matter of *969law, and it may seek recovery for the full amount it paid *(see, Travelers Ins. Co. v Brass Goods Mfg. Co.,*239 NY 273; *cf., Home Mut. Ins. Co. v Broadway Bank & Trust Co.,*100 Misc 2d 228, 234-236, *affd*76 AD2d 24, 28-29, *affd*53 NY2d 568, 578-579). Defendants’ remaining claims lack merit. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Patlow, J.— summary judgment.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Green and Balio, JJ.
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Stephen JACKSON, Appellant. Stephen JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. WD 47693, WD 49627.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Aug. 1, 1995.

Laura G. Martin, Asst. Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before ULRICH, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and ELLIS, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAIM:

Defendant appeals jury convictions of one count of forcible rape, § 566.030, two counts of armed criminal action, § 571.015, and one count of assault in the first degree, § 565.050, and sentences of 30 years imprisonment for the forcible rape to be served concurrently with sentences of 20 years each for the armed criminal action counts, and a consecutive life sentence for assault in the first degree. He also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 postconviction motion after hearing.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b). The judgment denying post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).