29244 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 103 / Tuesday, June 1, 2021 / Notices 

9See Certain Uncoated Paper from Australia, 

Brazil, the People’s Republic of China, Indonesia, 

and Portugal: Affirmative Final Determination of 

Circumvention of the Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Orders, 82 FR 41610 

(September 1, 2017). 

10See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Expedited First Sunset 

Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Certain 

Uncoated Paper from Indonesia,’’ dated 

concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this 

notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 

merchandise, constitute merchandise 

‘‘altered in form or appearance in minor 

respects’’ from in-scope merchandise 

that are subject to this order.9

Imports of the subject merchandise 

are provided for under Harmonized 

Tariff Schedule of the United States 

(HTSUS) categories 4802.56.1000, 

4802.56.2000, 4802.56.3000, 

4802.56.4000, 4802.56.6000, 

4802.56.7020, 4802.56.7040, 

4802.57.1000, 4802.57.2000, 

4802.57.3000, and 4802.57.4000. Some 

imports of subject merchandise may 

also be classified under 4802.62.1000, 

4802.62.2000, 4802.62.3000, 

4802.62.5000, 4802.62.6020, 

4802.62.6040, 4802.69.1000, 

4802.69.2000, 4802.69.3000, 

4811.90.8050 and 4811.90.9080. While 

HTSUS subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the scope is 

dispositive. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in this sunset review 

are addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.10 A list of the topics 

discussed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is attached as an 

appendix to this notice. The Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. 

Final Results of Sunset Review 

Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 

752(b) of the Act, we determine that 

revocation of the Order would be likely 

to lead to continuation or recurrence of 

countervailable subsidies at the 

following net countervailable subsidy 

rates: 

Manufacturers/producers/exporters 

Net 

countervailable 

subsidy 

(percent) 

PT Anugerah Kertas Utama, PT Riau Andalan Kertas, APRIL Fine Paper Macao Offshore Limited, PT Asia Pacific Rayon, 

PT Sateri Viscose International, A P Fine Paper Trading (Hong Kong) Limited, and APRIL International Enterprise Pte. 

Ltd .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 21.21 

Indah Kiat Pulp & Paper TBK/Pabrik Kertas Tjiwi Kimia/PT Pindo Deli Pulp and Paper Mills .................................................... 109.14 

Great Champ Trading Limited ....................................................................................................................................................... 103.99 

All Others ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 21.21 

Administrative Protective Order (APO) 

This notice also serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to an APO of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under an APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. 

Timely notification of the return or 

destruction of APO materials, or 

conversion to judicial protective orders, 

is hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a violation which is subject to 

sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing the 

final results and this notice in 

accordance with sections 751(c), 752(b), 

and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.218(f)(3). 

Dated: May 25, 2021. 

Christian Marsh, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. History of the Order 

V. Legal Framework 

VI. Discussion of the Issues 

1. Likelihood of Continuation or 

Recurrence of a Countervailable Subsidy 

2. Net Countervailable Subsidy Rates 

Likely to Prevail 

3. Nature of the Subsidies 

VII. Final Results of Sunset Review 

VIII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2021–11461 Filed 5–28–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–523–808] 

Certain Steel Nails From the Sultanate 

of Oman: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and Partial Rescission of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2019–2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) preliminarily determines 

that sales of certain steel nails (steel 

nails) from the Sultanate of Oman 

(Oman) have been made below normal 

value during the period of review (POR), 

July 1, 2019, through June 30, 2020. 

Further, Commerce is rescinding the 

administrative review, in part, with 

respect to Astrotech Steels Private Ltd. 

(Astrotech), Geekay Wires Limited 

(Geekay), Overseas International Steel 

Industry LLC & Overseas Distribution 

Services Inc. (Overseas), Trinity Steel 

Private Limited (Trinity Steel), 

Universal Freight Services LLC 

(Universal Freight Services), and WWL 

India Private Ltd (WWL India). 

Interested parties are invited to 

comment on this preliminary 

determination. 

DATES: Applicable June 1, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Dakota Potts, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0223. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Commerce is conducting an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on steel nails 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 103 / Tuesday, June 1, 2021 / Notices 29245 

1See Certain Steel Nails from the Republic of 

Korea, Malaysia, the Sultanate of Oman, Taiwan, 

and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: 

Antidumping Duty Orders, 80 FR 39994 (July 13, 

2015) (Order). 

2See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, 

Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

to Request Administrative Review, 85 FR 39531 

(July 1, 2020). 

3See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 85 FR 

54983 (September 3, 2020) (Initiation Notice). 

4See Commerce’s Letter, dated October 2, 2020. 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review of Certain Steel Nails from 

the Sultanate of Oman; 2019–2020,’’ dated 

concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this 

notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 

6 Id. 

7See 19 CFR 351.212(b). 

8See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. 

9For a full discussion of this practice, see 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 

(May 6, 2003). 

10See Certain Steel Nails from the Republic of 

Oman: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than 

Fair Value, 80 FR 28955 (May 20, 2015). 

from Oman.1 On July 1, 2020, 

Commerce published in the Federal 

Register a notice of opportunity to 

request an administrative review of the 

Order.2 The notice of initiation 

published on September 3, 2020.3 On 

October 2, 2020, Commerce selected 

Oman Fasteners LLC (Oman Fasteners) 

as the sole mandatory respondent.4 For 

a complete description of the events that 

followed the initiation of this review, 

see the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum.5

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by the Order 

are nails from Oman. For a complete 

description of the scope, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum.6

Partial Rescission of Administrative 

Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), 

Commerce will rescind an 

administrative review, in whole or in 

part, if a party who requested the review 

withdraws the request within 90 days of 

the date of publication of initiation of 

the requested review. On September 21, 

2020, Mid Continent Steel & Wire (the 

petitioner) withdrew its requests for an 

administrative review of Astrotech, 

Geekay, Overseas, Trinity Steel, 

Universal Freight Services, and WWL 

India. No other party requested a review 

of these companies. Accordingly, we are 

rescinding this review with respect to 

these companies, pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(1). The review will continue 

with respect to Oman Fasteners. 

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this 

administrative review in accordance 

with sections 751(a)(1)(B) and (2) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930 (the Act). Export price 

and constructed export price are 

calculated in accordance with section 

772 of the Act. Normal value is 

calculated in accordance with section 

773 of the Act. 

For a full discussion of the 

methodology underlying our 

conclusions, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. The 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/ 

frn/. A list of the topics discussed in the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is 

attached as in appendix II to this notice. 

Preliminary Results of the Review 

We preliminarily determine that the 

following weighted-average dumping 

margin exists for the period July 1, 2019, 

through June 30, 2020: 

Exporter/producer 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Oman Fasteners LLC ................. 1.76 

Assessment Rates 

Upon issuance of the final results, 

Commerce shall determine, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries covered by this 

review.7 The final results of this review 

shall be the basis for the assessment of 

antidumping duties on entries of 

merchandise covered by this review and 

for future deposits of estimated duties, 

where applicable.8

Commerce intends to issues 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

summons is timely filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

where an examined respondent’s 

weighted-average dumping margin is 

not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 

percent), we calculated an importerspecific ad valorem duty assessment 

rate based on the ratio of the total 

amount of dumping calculated for the 

U.S. sales for a given importer to the 

total entered value of those sales. Where 

the mandatory respondent did not 

report entered value, we calculated the 

entered value in order to calculate the 

assessment rate. Where either the 

respondent’s weighted-average dumping 

margin is zero or de minimis within the 

meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), or an 

importer-specific assessment rate is zero 

or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties. 

Commerce’s ‘‘automatic assessment’’ 

practice will apply to entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR produced 

by Oman Fasteners for which the 

reviewed companies did not know that 

the merchandise they sold to the 

intermediary (e.g., a reseller, trading 

company, or exporter) was destined for 

the United States. In such instances, we 

will instruct CBP to liquidate such 

unreviewed entries pursuant to the 

reseller policy,9 i.e., the assessment rate 

for such entries will be equal to the allothers rate established in the 

investigation (i.e. 9.10 percent),10 if 

there is no rate for the intermediate 

company(ies) involved in the 

transaction. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following deposit requirements 

will be effective for all shipments of 

steel nails from Oman entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date of the final results of this 

administrative review, as provided by 

section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The 

cash deposit rate for the exporters listed 

above will be that established in the 

final results of this review, except if the 

rate is less than 0.50 percent and, 

therefore, de minimis within the 

meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in 

which case the cash deposit rate will be 

zero; (2) for previously reviewed or 

investigated companies not 

participating in this review, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

company-specific rate published for the 

most recently-completed segment of this 

proceeding in which the company was 

reviewed; (3) if the exporter is not a firm 

covered in this review, a prior review, 

or the less-than-fair value (LTFV) 

investigation, but the manufacturer is, 

then the cash deposit rate will be the 

rate established for the most recently 

completed segment of this proceeding 

for the manufacturer of subject 

merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
29246 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 103 / Tuesday, June 1, 2021 / Notices 

11 Id. 

12See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii); see also 19 CFR 

351.303 (for general filing requirements). 

13See 19 CFR 351.309; see also 19 CFR 351.303 

(for general filing requirements). 

14See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 

15See 19 CFR 351.303. 

16See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD 

Service Requirements Due to Covid–19; Extension of 

Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020). 

17See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

18See 19 CFR 351.310(c); see also 19 CFR 

351.303(b)(1). 

19See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. 

rate for all other manufacturers or 

exporters will continue to be 9.10 

percent, the all-others rate made 

effective by the LTFV investigation.11

These deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

Commerce intends to disclose the 

calculations performed in connection 

with these preliminary results to 

interested parties within five days after 

the date of publication of this notice in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

Interested parties may submit case 

briefs no later than 30 days after the 

date of publication of this notice.12

Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised 

in the case briefs, may be filed no later 

than seven days after the time limit for 

filing case briefs.13 Parties who submit 

case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this 

proceeding are encouraged to submit 

with each argument: (1) A statement of 

the issue; (2) a brief summary of the 

argument; and (3) a table of 

authorities.14 Case and rebuttal briefs 

should be filed using ACCESS and must 

be served on interested parties.15 Note 

that Commerce has modified certain of 

its requirements for serving documents 

containing business proprietary 

information until further notice.16

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), 

interested parties who wish to request a 

hearing must submit a written request to 

the Acting Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance, filed 

electronically via ACCESS. Hearing 

requests should contain: (1) The party’s 

name, address, and telephone number; 

(2) the number of participants; and (3) 

a list of issues to be discussed. Issues 

raised in the hearing will be limited to 

issues raised in the briefs. If a request 

for a hearing is made, Commerce 

intends to hold the hearing at a date and 

time to be determined.17 Parties should 

confirm by telephone the date, time, and 

location of the hearing two days before 

the scheduled date. 

An electronically-filed request for a 

hearing must be received successfully in 

its entirety by ACCESS by 5 p.m. 

Eastern Time within 30 days after the 

date of publication of this notice.18

Commerce intends to issue the final 

results of this administrative review, 

including the results of its analysis of 

issues raised in all written briefs, not 

later than 120 days after the publication 

of these preliminary results in the 

Federal Register pursuant to section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.213(h)(1), unless otherwise 

extended.19

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a preliminary 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This determination is issued and 

published in accordance with sections 

733(f) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.205(c). 

Dated: May 19, 2021. 

Christian Marsh, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the AD Order 

IV. Rescission of Requested Companies 

V. Discussion of the methodology 

VI. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2021–11464 Filed 5–28–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Antidumping or Countervailing Duty 

Order, Finding, or Suspended 

Investigation; Advance Notification of 

Sunset Review 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Every five years, pursuant to the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), the 

Department of Commerce (Commerce) 

and the International Trade Commission 

automatically initiate and conduct 

reviews to determine whether 

revocation of a countervailing or 

antidumping duty order or termination 

of an investigation suspended under 

section 704 or 734 of the Act would be 

likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of dumping or a 

countervailable subsidy (as the case may 

be) and of material injury. 

Upcoming Sunset Reviews for July 2021 

Pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act, 

the following Sunset Reviews are 

scheduled for initiation in July 2021 and 

will appear in that month’s notice of 

Initiation of Five-Year Sunset Reviews 

(Sunset Review). 

Department contact 

Antidumping Duty Proceedings 

Carbon Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings from Brazil, A–351–602 (5th Review) ......................................... Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. 

Carbon Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings from China, A–570–814 (5th Review) ......................................... Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. 

Hydrofluorocarbon Blends and Components Thereof from China, A–570–028 (1st Review) ................ Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785.

Porcelain-on-Steel Cooking Ware from China, A–570–506 (5th Review) ............................................... Thomas Martin, (202) 482–3936. 

Carbon Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings from Japan, A–588–602 (5th Review) ......................................... Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. 

Stainless Steel Wire Rod from Japan, A–588–843 (4th Review) ............................................................ Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. 

Stainless Steel Wire Rod from South Korea, A–580–829 (4th Review) ................................................. Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. 

Carbon Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings from Taiwan, A–583–605 (5th Review) ....................................... Mary Kolbert, (202) 482–1785. 

Stainless Steel Wire Rod from Taiwan, A–583–828 (4th Review) .......................................................... Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. 

Carbon Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings from Thailand, A–549–807 (5th Review) ..................................... Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES