alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 129242 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 129242 

 COA: 259612 

Monroe CC: 01-031597-FH 

WILLIAM M. WILKES,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 24, 2005 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

d1121 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2005 

Clerk
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 14.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our audit report
dated May 25, 2004 on the consolidated financial statements of ASAT Holdings
Limited (the "Company"), as of and for the two years ended April 30, 2004 and
2003, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of ASAT Holdings Limited for
the fiscal year ended April 30, 2004 into the Company's Registration Statement
on Form S-8 filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on February
13, 2001.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers
Hong Kong
July 9, 2004
EXHIBIT 32 .02





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION


906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of FormCap Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),





I, Bradley Moynes, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated: April 15, 2015


Signature: /s/ Bradley Moynes


Bradley Moynes


Chief Financial Officer
#### William B. GRACE, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, Respondent.

No. WD 51151.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

April 9, 1996.

Robert Desselle, Independence, for appellant.

Paul Gurney, Overland Park, for respondent.

Before HANNA, P.J., FENNER, C.J., and ELLIS, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The trial court sustained respondent’s motion for summary judgment. The trial court determined that the respondent’s insurance policy unambiguously limited the insured’s loss. A published opinion would have no precedential value. Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
## S IXTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 6D2 3

- 1100 Lower Tribunal No. 2022

- CF

- 000509

- A

- XXX

- XX

_____________________________ M ONICA P ETROSIAN , Appellant ,
v. S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee

.

_____________________________ Appeal from the Circuit Court for Collier County

.

Elizabeth V. Krier , Judge. January 2, 2024
PER CURIAM

. AFFIRMED

. NARDELLA, WHITE and MIZE , JJ., c oncur.
Howard L. “Rex” Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Jason Reid, Special Assistant Public Defender , Bartow , for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Krystle Celine Cacci , Assistant Attorney General, Tampa , for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING

AND DISPOSI TION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5668 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5668

To provide appropriations for the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 during 
          the first lapse in appropriations in a fiscal year.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 21, 2023

Mrs. Sykes (for herself, Ms. Brown, Ms. Adams, Mr. Carter of Louisiana, 
   Ms. Salinas, Mr. Nickel, Ms. Jacobs, Mr. Payne, Ms. Sanchez, Ms. 
  Tokuda, and Ms. Brownley) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide appropriations for the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 during 
          the first lapse in appropriations in a fiscal year.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Feed Our Families Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. APPROPRIATIONS FOR SNAP DURING FIRST LAPSE IN APPROPRIATIONS IN 
              A FISCAL YEAR.

    In the case of any fiscal year beginning after September 30, 2023, 
there is appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise 
appropriated, such sums as are necessary to carry out the Food and 
Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.) for the first 90-day 
period beginning on the first day of a lapse in discretionary 
appropriations for carrying out such Act for such fiscal year: 
Provided, That such funds shall be placed in reserve for use only in 
such amounts and at such times as may become necessary to carry out 
program operations: Provided further, That such funds shall remain 
available until expended.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to incorporation  by reference in the Registration  Statement on Form
S-8, (SEC File No.  333-81498),  filed on January 28, 2002, and the Registration
Statement  on Form S-8 (SEC File No.  333-83130),  filed on February 21, 2002 of
our independent  auditor's  report dated June 20, 2002,  relating to the balance
sheets of AdZone  Research,  Inc.  (formerly  Executive Help Services,  Inc.) (a
Delaware corporation and a development stage company) (SEC File No. 0-28717, CIK
# 1102013) as of March 31, 2002 and 2001  (post-acquisition)  and March 31, 2001
(pre-acquisition)  and the related  statements of operations  and  comprehensive
income, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for the years ended March
31,   2002  and  2001   (post-acquisition),   the  year  ended  March  31,  2001
(pre-acquisition)  and for the period from February 28, 2000 (date of inception)
through March 31, 2002,  which report  appears in the 2002 Annual Report on Form
10-KSB of AdZone Research, Inc.



                                                      S. W. HATFIELD, CPA

Dallas, Texas
July 15, 2002
**Exhibit 31.1** **CERTIFICATION**     I, Kenneth M. Schwartz, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on    Form 10-Q    of K&F Industries Holdings, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any    untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and    other financial information included in this report, fairly    present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,    and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are    responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls    and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and have:     (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this report is    being prepared;     (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) disclosed in this report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter    (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an    annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably    likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal    control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I    have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of    directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal control over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. /s/  KENNETH    M. SCHWARTZ    Kenneth M. Schwartz    President and Chief Executive Officer     Date: May 11, 2006
#### New Jersey Steel Acquisition Corporation, Respondent, v Von Roll AG. et al., Appellants.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (David B. Saxe, J.), entered March 5, 1990, which granted defendants’ motion to renew their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and adhered to the prior order of the same court entered April 12, 1989, denying said motion, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Our review of the record reveals that defendants failed to establish their defense sufficiently to warrant a court directing judgment in their favor as a matter of law. *(See, Gilbert Frank Corp. v Federal Ins. Co.,*70 NY2d 966, 967.) Material issues of fact exist concerning whether plaintiff New Jersey Steel Acquisition Corporation had obtained the requisite financial commitments from various lending institutions to allow it to proceed with the leveraged buyout of defendants’ New Jersey steel mill, in accordance with a prescribed timetable, before defendant terminated the parties’ stock purchase agreement in May 1984. We note that the various depositions upon which defendants place reliance did not resolve the dispute. Concur —Ross, J. P., Carro, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jerry M. WEIDE, Appellant. Jeny M. WEIDE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. WD 48820, WD 50206.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

June 13, 1995.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Aug. 1, 1995.

Application to Transfer Denied Sept. 19, 1995.

Dennis J.C. Owens, Kansas City, for appellant.

Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before HANNA, P.J., and BERREY and SPINDEN, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jerry M. Weide appeals his conviction of possession of a Schedule II controlled substance and his life sentence as a prior and persistent drug offender and a prior and persistent offender. He also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief. We affirm the judgments of conviction and denial of his Rule 29.15 motion. Because we do not discern any jurisprudential value in publishing an opinion, we issue this summary order. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
**Exhibit 9.3**

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos.333-85168, 333-09292, 333-74321, 333-124983 and 333-124997) and on Form F-3 and Form F-3/A (File No. 333-86288) of Acergy S.A. (the “Company”) of our report dated June 10, 2005, with respect to the financial statements of NKTFlexibles I/S as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004, prepared in accordance with the Danish Financial Statements Act. Such statements, as included in NKT Flexibles I/S’ Annual Report for 2005 and with the addition of note 14“Reconciliation to United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (US GAAP)”, are included on pages 8-24 of exhibit 15.2 of Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 20-F of Acergy S.A. for the year ended November 30, 2005.

Copenhagen, June 30, 2006 

**KPMG C.Jespersen**

Statsautoriseret Revisionsinteressentskab 

/s/ LarsAndersen 

Lars Andersen 

State Authorised Public Accountant
exv10w13






Exhibit 10.13




	 	 	 	 	 

	 

	 	GUITTARD®
	 	FIRM
	 

	 	 	 	CONTRACT
	 

	 	 	 	G460, G461
	 

	 	Since 1868
	 	JAN 19, 2010





GUITTARD CHOCOLATE CO. OF BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA, AGREES TO SELL, AND




	 	 	 

	ROCKY MOUNTAIN CHOCOLATE FACTORY
	 	 
	265 TURNER DRIVE

	 	ACCT:      475155
	DURANGO, CO 81301

	 	     PHONE:      970-247-4943
	ATTN: MR. BRYAN MERRYMAN
	 	 





AGREES TO PURCHASE THE FOLLOWING SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS INDICATED BELOW:




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	QTY.	 	ITEM	 	PACK	 	PRICE PER POUND	 	F.O.B. LOCATION
	*

	 	*
	 	*
	 	*
	 	*





F.O.B. SEE ABOVE



WITHDRAWALS TO START NOW AND TO BE COMPLETED BY JUNE 30, 2010




     At seller’s option withdrawal date may be extended ninety days at an additional charge of
one hundred and thirty cents per hundred weight.



     Our terms are 2% ten days, thirty days net, seller’s credit department having the right to
determine the amount of open credit during the thirty day period. If buyer fails to fulfill the
terms of payment, the seller has the right to defer shipments until such payments are made.



     Should any form of tax be levied by the United States Government, or any political
subdivisions, on these items, or on the raw materials contained therein, it shall be assumed and
paid for by the buyer.



     Performance of this contract by the seller shall be excused in the event of floods, fires,
strike, plant disablement, war, raw material controls, acts of God, or other conditions beyond its
control, no matter where such event occurs.



     Buyer will be protected against advance in price, but it is understood and agreed that the
above prices are NOT GUARANTEED AGAINST decline.



	 	 	 	 	 

	ACCEPTED BY:

	 	 	 	ACCEPTED BY:
	 
	 	 	 	 
	ROCKY MTN. CHOCOLATE FACTORY

	 	 	 	GUITTARD CHOCOLATE COMPANY
	 

	 	 	 	 
	CUSTOMER NAME
	 	 	 	 
	 
	/s/ Bryan J. Merryman

	 	 	 	/s/ Mark Spini
	 

	 	 	 	 
	BUYER
	 	 	 	 
	 
	February 9, 2010

	 	 	 	January 19, 2010
	 

	 	 	 	 
	Date

	 	 	 	Date






CUSTOMER COPY


Legend:




     * The material has been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment and such
material has been filed separately with the Commission.



GUITTARD CHOCOLATE COMPANY

MANUFACTURERS OF CHOCOLATE AND COCOA PRODUCTS • 10 GUITTARD ROAD, BURLINGAME, CA 94010-2203

P.O. BOX 4308 • BURLINGAME, CA 94011-4308

(650) 697-4427 • (800) 468-2462 • FAX (650) 692-2761 • www.guittard.com
Exhibit 10.31

CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
OF THE
SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
HELIO, INC.,
a Delaware corporation

Pursuant to Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, the undersigned, Wonhee Sull, Chief Executive Officer of
Helio, Inc. (the "Corporation"), a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the "DGCL"), DOES HEREBY
CERTIFY,

FIRST:
The Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation is hereby amended as follows:

1.     Article 5.1
shall hereby be renamed "Conversion of Class B Common Stock and Preferred Stock."

2.     Article 5.1.1
shall hereby be renamed "Voluntary Conversion of Class B Common Stock."

3.     Article 5.1.2
shall hereby be deleted in its entirety and replaced as follows:



4.     Appropriate
changes to Article 4.5(i) shall be made to provide for an additional subsection following Article 4.5(i). Moreover, the following shall be added
to the end of Article 4.5:



5.     The
following shall be added as Article 5.1.3:



5.     Article 5.15
shall hereby be deleted in its entirety and replaced as follows:



6.     Article 5.16
shall hereby be deleted in its entirety and replaced as follows:



---





7.     The
definitions of the following terms provided in Article 10 shall be deleted in their entirety and replaced with the following:



10.   The
following definitions are hereby added to Article 10:



2

---





3

---





SECOND:
The amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation set forth in this Certificate of Amendment has been duly adopted in accordance
with the provisions of Section 242 of the DGCL by (a) the Board of Directors of the Corporation having duly adopted a resolution setting forth such amendment and declaring its
advisability and submitting it to the stockholders of the Corporation for their approval, and (b) the stockholders of the Corporation having duly adopted such amendment by vote of
(i) the holders of a majority of the outstanding Class A
Common Stock and Class B Common Stock entitled to vote thereon voting together as a single class and (ii) holders of all of the outstanding Class B Common Stock, at a special
meeting of stockholders called and held upon notice in accordance with Section 222 of the DGCL.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF this Certificate of Amendment of the Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation has been executed by the Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation on
this 28th day of February 2008.

| |  | By:    |                        
| |  | ------ | -----------------------
| |  | Name:  | Wonhee Sull            
| |  | Title: | Chief Executive Officer

4

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 10.29



 Exhibit 10.29 

TERMINATION OF DEFERRED SUPPLEMENTAL 

COMPENSATION AGREEMENT WITH 

CYNTHIA A. SABOL

This Termination of Deferred Supplemental Compensation Agreement made this
31st day of March, 2010, between the BANK OF THE
COMMONWEALTH, a Virginia banking corporation, Norfolk, Virginia (hereinafter called the “Bank”) and CYNTHIA A. SABOL (hereinafter called “Employee”). 

WHEREAS, Employee is an employee of the Bank and is a party to a Deferred Supplemental Compensation Agreement (which may have been
amended and/or restated on one or more occasions) between Employee and Bank (hereinafter called “Deferred Compensation Agreement”); and 

WHEREAS, Employee and Bank have mutually agreed to terminate the Deferred Compensation Agreement in recognition of the Bank’s desire
to obtain additional capital, the Employee’s desire to continue employment, and in recognition of the Bank’s desire to terminate the economic liability associated with deferred compensation arrangements involving all employees who are not
in payment status under said agreements. 
 THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which
is hereby acknowledged, (1) the Deferred Compensation Agreement is hereby terminated by mutual consent of the Bank and the Employee; (2) no payment or economic benefit of any kind shall be paid by the Bank to the Employee; (3) any
Bank assets associated with the Deferred Compensation Agreement, including, but not limited to, policies of life insurance, remain the property of the Bank; and (4) the Bank and the Employee hereby release each other of any claims which have
arisen from or may in the future arise from the entry of the Deferred Compensation Agreement and the termination of said Deferred Compensation Agreement, all effective on the date first written above. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Termination of Preferred Supplemental Compensation Agreement on the date first written
above. 
  

									
	BANK OF THE COMMONWEALTH	 		 	EMPLOYEE:
					
	By:	 	/s/    Edward J. Woodard, Jr.	 		 	By:	 	/s/    Cynthia A. Sabol
	Its:	 	President and Chief Executive Officer	 		 		 	CYNTHIA A. SABOL
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 68 (Monday, April 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 18163]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8699]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

Houston District Advisory Council; Public Meeting

    The U.S. Small Business Administration Houston District Advisory 
Council will hold a public meeting on Thursday, April 27, 1995 at 1:30 
p.m. in the SBA Conference Room, 9301 Southwest Freeway, Suite 550, 
Houston, Texas 77074-1591, to discuss matters as may be presented by 
members, staff of the U.S. Small Business Administration, or others 
present.
    For further information, write or call Mr. Melton Wilson, Jr., 
District Director, U.S. Small Business Administration, 9301 Southwest 
Freeway, Suite 550, Houston, Texas 77074-1591, (713) 773-6500.

    Dated: April 4, 1995.
Dorothy A. Overal,
Director, Office of Advisory Council.
[FR Doc. 95-8699 Filed 4-7-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-M
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Di smiss ed and Memorandum Opinion filed

April 17 , 2014.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 14

- 00276

- CR

IN RE LEONARDO M. LO ZANO , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 228th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1277258



### MEMORANDUM OPINION
On April 8, 2014, relator Leonardo M. Lozano filed a petition for writ of

m andamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this Court to compel the Honorable Marc Carter, presiding judge of the 228th District Court of Harris County
, to rule on his
motion for dismissal based on newly discovered evidence

.2

Althou gh courts of appeals have jurisdiction in criminal matters, only the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction over matters related to final post

conviction felony proceedings. Tex. Code Proc. Ann. Art. 11.07, § 5 (West Supp. 2013) ; Padieu v. Court of Appeals of Tex., Fifth Dist. , 392 S.W.3d 115, 117 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013) (orig. proceeding). The Court of Criminal Appeals ’ exclusive jurisdiction under article 11.07 does not , however, divest the courts of appeals of jurisdiction to decide the merits of a mandamus petition complaini ng that a district judge has not rul ed on a motion when the relator has no article 11.07 application pending. Padieu , 392 S.W.3d at 117−18. We do not have jurisdiction over relator’s petition. In the motion relator

purp ortedly filed in the trial court, relator references an “Art. 11.07 writ, seeking my justice.” To the extent that relator’s motion can be construe d as an article 11.07 application for writ of habeas corpus, only the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has jur isdiction over relator’s request ed relief. See id. at 117

. Because it appears that relator filed this motion in connection with a pending article 11.07 application, we do not have jurisdiction to compel the trial court to rule on relator’ s motion. See id. at 117−18. Accordingly, we dismiss relator’s petition for writ of mandamus for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM
Panel Consists of Justices Boyce, Busby, and Wise. Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).