This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains documents other than rules or

proposed rules that are applicable to the

public. Notices of hearings and investigations,

committee meetings, agency decisions and

rulings, delegations of authority, filing of

petitions and applications and agency

statements of organization and functions are

examples of documents appearing in this

section.

Notices Federal Register

3192

Vol. 60, No. 9

Friday, January 13, 1995

ARCHITECTURAL AND

TRANSPORTATION BARRIERS

COMPLIANCE BOARD

Meeting

AGENCY: Architectural and

Transportation Barriers Compliance

Board.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

SUMMARY: On December 28, 1994 (59 FR

66888), a notice was published

announcing the schedule of events at

the Architectural and Transportation

Barriers Compliance Board’s meetings

on Tuesday and Wednesday, January

17–18, 1995. The time of the Board

meeting on Wednesday, January 18,

1995, has been changed. A revised

schedule of events is published below.

DATES: The schedule of events is as

follows:

Tuesday, January 17, 1995

9:30–12 Noon—State and Local

Government Facilities Work Group

(closed meeting)

1:30–3:30 p.m.—State and Local

Government Facilities Work Group

Continued (closed meeting)

3:45–5:30 p.m.—Recreational Facilities

and Outdoor Developed Areas Work

Group (closed meeting)

Wednesday, January 18, 1995

9:00–12 Noon—Federal Facilities Work

Group (closed meeting)

12 Noon–1:30 p.m.—Board Meeting.

ADDRESSES: The meetings will be held

at: Marriott at Metro Center, 775 12th

Street NW., Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For

further information regarding the

meetings, please contact Lawrence W.

Roffee, Executive Director, (202) 272–

5434 ext. 14 (voice) and (202) 272–5449

(TTY).

Lawrence W. Roffee,

Executive Director.

[FR Doc. 95–867 Filed 1–12–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8150–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

Initiation of Antidumping and

Countervailing Duty Administrative

Reviews

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of initiation of

antidumping and countervailing duty

administrative reviews.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce

(the Department) has received requests

to conduct administrative reviews of

various antidumping and countervailing

duty orders and findings with December

anniversary dates. In accordance with

the Commerce Regulations, we are

initiating those administrative reviews.

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 13, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Holly A. Kuga, Office of Antidumping

Compliance, Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th

Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,

Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202)

482–4737.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

The Department has received timely

requests, in accordance with 19 CFR

353.22(a) and 355.22(a) (1994), for

administrative reviews of various

antidumping and countervailing duty

orders and findings with December

anniversary dates.

Initiation of Reviews

In accordance with sections 19 CFR

353.22(c) and 355.22(c), we are

initiating administrative reviews of the

following antidumping and

countervailing duty orders and findings.

We intend to issue the final results of

these reviews not later than December

31, 1995.
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 9 / Friday, January 13, 1995 / Notices 3193

Antidumping duty proceedings Period to be reviewed

Canada:

Elemental Sulphur A–122–047

Mobil Oil Canada, Ltd., Petrosul International, Alberta Energy Co., Ltd., Husky Oil Canada, Ltd., Norcen Energy

Resources, Ltd 12/01/93–11/30/94

Mexico:

Porcelain-on-Steel Cooking Ware A–201–504

Esmaltaciones San Ignacio, S.A. Cinsa, S.A. de C.V 12/01/93–11/30/94

Japan:

Polychloroprene Rubber A–588–046

Denki Kaguku, K.K., Denki Kaguku Kogyo, K.K./Hoei Sangyo Co., Ltd., Mitsui Bussan K.K., Showa Neoprene

K.K., Showa Neoprene K.K./Hoei Sangyo Co., Ltd., Suzugo Corporation, Toyo Soda Mfg. Co., Ltd., Toyo

Soda Mfg. Co., Ltd./Hoei Sangyo Co., Ltd 12/01/93–11/30/94

Taiwan:

Certain Welded Stainless Steel Pipe A–583–815

Ta Chen 12/01/93–11/30/94

The People’s Republic of China:

Porcelain-on-Steel Cooking Ware A–570–506

Clover Enamelware Enterprise/Lucky Enamelware Factory, China National Light I/E Corp./Shanghai Branch/

Amerport (H.K.) 12/01/93–11/30/94

Countervailing Duty Proceedings

Mexico:

Porcelain-on-Steel Cooking Ware* C–201–505 01/01/94–12/31/94

* Two requests were received for an individual company review under 19 CFR 355.22(a)(2). The Department is currently reviewing these requests to ensure that they meet the requirements for an individual company review.

Interested parties must submit

applications for disclosure under

administrative protection orders in

accordance with 19 CFR 353.34(b) and

355.34(b).

These initiations and this notice are

in accordance with section 751(a) of the

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19

U.S.C. 1675(a)) and 19 CFR 353.22(c)(1)

and 355.22(c)(1).

Dated: January 9, 1995.

Joseph A. Spetrini,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Compliance.

[FR Doc. 95–969 Filed 1–12–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–M

[A–475–801]

Antifriction Bearings From Italy; Notice

of United States Court of International

Trade Decision

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce

SUMMARY: On October 20, 1994, in

Torrington v. United States, Slip Op.

94–167 (Torrington), the United States

Court of International Trade (CIT)

affirmed the Department of Commerce’s

(the Department) redetermination on

remand of the final results of the first

administrative review of the

antidumping duty order on antifriction

bearings (other than tapered roller

bearings) and parts thereof from Italy, 56

FR 31751 (July 11, 1991). The CIT had

previously remanded the final results to

the Department for the reconsideration

of a number of issues. The CIT has now

entered final judgment on all issues.

The results covered the period

November 9, 1988, through April 30,

1990.

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 30, 1994.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: J.

David Dirstine or Richard Rimlinger,

Office of Antidumping Compliance,

Import Administration, International

Trade Administration, U.S. Department

of Commerce, 14th and Constitution

Avenue NW., Washington DC 20230;

telephone (202) 482–4733.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

On July 8, 1993, the CIT in Torrington

v. United States, Slip Op. 93–125,

remanded the final results of the first

administrative review of the

antidumping duty order on antifriction

bearings (other than tapered roller

bearings) and parts thereof from Italy to

the Department to: (1) Add the full

amount of value added tax (VAT) paid

on each sale in the home market to

foreign market value (FMV) without

adjustment; (2) treat certain of SKF

Industrie, S.p.A.’s (SKF) discounts as

indirect expenses unless the manner in

which they were reported met the

standard for treatment as direct

expenses; and (3) remove discounts paid

on SKF’s and FAG Cuscinetti S.p.A.’s

(FAG) out-of-scope merchandise or, if

not possible, disallow the discounts.

The Department submitted its results of

redetermination on remand to the court

on September 22, 1993. On December

10, 1993, in Torrington v. United States,

Slip Op. 93–234, the CIT again

remanded the case to the Department to:

(1) Apply Italy’s VAT rate to the United

States price (USP) calculated at the

same point in the stream of commerce

as Italy’s VAT is applied for home

market sales, and add the resulting

amount to USP; and (2) choose

appropriate best information available

(BIA) for the adjustment to FAG’s USP

for U.S. discounts and treat the

adjustment as a direct selling expense.

The Department submitted its

redetermination pursuant to this second

remand order on January 10, 1994. On

March 4, 1994, in Torrington v. United

States, Slip Op. 94–37, the CIT again

remanded the case for the Department

(1) to implement its new VAT

methodology and recalculate the VAT

pursuant to the partial final judgment

on the issue previously entered in the

case; (2) to determine and apply BIA for

the adjustment to FAG’s USP for U.S.

discounts; and (3) to determine whether

the Department has statutory authority

to adjust FMV, calculated using

purchase price, for FAG’s pre-sale

inland freight in light of Ad Hoc Comm.

of AZ–NM–TX–FL Producers of Gray

Portland Cement v. United States, 13

F.3d 398 (Fed. Cir. 1994). The

Department submitted its results of

redetermination pursuant to this third

remand order on May 17, 1994. On

October 20, 1994, in Torrington, the CIT

affirmed the Department’s results of

remand and entered final judgment on

all issues.

In its decision in Timken Co. v.

United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir.

1990) (Timken), the United States Court

of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held

that, pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1516a(e), the