alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4010

Enerpac:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5627 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5627

  To require a report relating to the Special Presidential Envoy for 
                                Climate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 21, 2023

 Mr. Burchett introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require a report relating to the Special Presidential Envoy for 
                                Climate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SPECIAL PRESIDENTIAL ENVOY FOR CLIMATE REPORTING 
              REQUIREMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of State shall submit to the 
appropriate congressional committees a report on the following:
            (1) Budget information detailing expenditures of the 
        Special Presidential Envoy for Climate, during fiscal years 
        2021 and 2022.
            (2) The number of temporary and full-time employees 
        currently working in the Office of the Special Presidential 
        Envoy for Climate, including the names of all such full-time 
        employees.
            (3) Information on the Special Presidential Envoy for 
        Climate's foreign travel, including--
                    (A) carbon emissions from air travel, as required 
                by Executive Order 14057; and
                    (B) the dates, attendees, and discussion topics 
                from all meetings with foreign leaders.
    (b) Definitions.--In this section--
            (1) the term ``appropriate congressional committees'' means 
        the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of 
        Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the 
        Senate; and
            (2) the term ``Office of the Special Presidential Envoy for 
        Climate'' means the staff, full-time employees, temporary 
        employees, and contractors, supporting the Special Presidential 
        Envoy for Climate.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Floyd DUDLEY, Appellant. Floyd DUDLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. 62366, 64160.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Feb. 22, 1994.

Ellen H. Flottman, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Cheryl A. Caponegro, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his jury conviction for sale of a controlled substance and the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm

The findings of fact issued by the motion court are not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears. Rule 84.16(b)(2) and (5). We find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion and affirm by summary order. Rule 30.25(b). A memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision has been issued to the parties for their use only.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5355

Kyungshin Lear Sales and Engineering LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

“Made in China 2025” or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 2000, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE TWELVE MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          21,772
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   62,667
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,907
<INVENTORY>                                      7,607
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                83,125
<PP&E>                                          18,732
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,043
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  97,801
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,985
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           409
<OTHER-SE>                                       (342)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    97,801
<SALES>                                        122,234
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               122,234
<CGS>                                           44,823
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   77,234
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,033
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    502
<INCOME-TAX>                                       297
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                205
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       205
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01


</TABLE>
#### STATE FARM MUTUAL, AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE, Respondent, v. Richard HENSLEY, et al., Appellant, Ronald Garwood, Defendant.

No. WD 48632.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

July 26, 1994.

Grant Davis, Kansas City, for appellants.

Daniel Hamann, Kansas City, for respondent.

Kendall Garten, Blue Springs, for defendant.

Before HANNA, P.J., and FENNER and SMART, JJ.

*ORDER*

*PER CURIAM.*

Appeal from a declaratory judgment holding no insurance coverage under the respondent’s insurance policy.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause Number: 01-19-00011-CV

Trial Court Cause 

Number: 2018-46488

Style: Richard Andert Robins

v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline d/b/a Texas Bar a/k/a State Bar of Texas

Date motion filed*: September 4, 2019

Type of motion: Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed: Reply Brief

Is appeal accelerated? Yes No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: July 17, 2019

Number of previous extensions granted: 2

Date Requested: September 10, 2019

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: September 13, 2019

The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: 

Judge's signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

 Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: September 10, 2019
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 74 (Tuesday, April 18, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 19447]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9452]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
[T.D. 95-32]


Tuna Fish--Tariff-Rate Quota

AGENCY: U.S. Customs Service, Department of the Treasury.

ACTION: Announcement of the quota quantity for tuna for calendar year 
1995.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Each year the tariff-rate quota for tuna fish described in 
item 1604.14.20, HTSUS, is based on the United States canned tuna 
production for the preceding calendar year.

EFFECTIVE DATE: The 1995 tariff-rate quota is applicable to tuna fish 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption during the period 
January 1 through December 31, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen L. Cooper, Chief, Quota, 
Technical Programs, Trade Compliance Division, Office of Field 
Operations, U.S. Customs Service, Washington, DC 20229, (202) 927-5401. 
It has now been determined that 33,278,830 kilograms of tuna may be 
entered for consumption or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption 
during the Calendar Year 1995, at the rate of 6 percent ad valorem 
under item 1604.14.20, HTSUS. Any such tuna which is entered, or 
withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption during the current calendar 
year in excess of this quota will be dutiable at the rate of 12.5 
percent ad valorem under item 1604.14.30 HTSUS. (OFO-TC:T:Q)

    Dated: April 12, 1995.
Michael H. Lane,
Acting Commissioner.
[FR Doc. 95-9452 Filed 4-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4820-02-P
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 83 (Monday, April 29, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 18725]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10474]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army


Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP) Scientific Advisory 
Board

AGENCY: Department of the Army.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In Accordance with 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Public Law (92-463), announcement is made of the following open 
meeting:
    Date: 9-10 May 1996.
    Time: 8:00 am.
    Place: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Building 54, 
Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Ridgely Rabold, Center for Advanced Pathology (CAP), AFIP, Building 
54, Washington, DC 20306, phone (202) 782-2553.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

    General function of the board: The Scientific Advisory Board 
provides scientific and professional advice and guidance on programs, 
policies, and procedures of the AFIP.
    Agenda: The board will hear status reports from the AFIP Deputy 
Directors, CAP Director, the National Museum of Health and Medicine, 
and selected pathology departments. Board members will visit several of 
the pathology departments.
    Open board discussions: Reports will be given on all visited 
departments. The reports will consist of findings, recommended areas of 
further research, and suggested solutions. New trends and/or 
technologies will be discussed and goals established. The meeting is 
open to the public.
Gregory D. Showalter,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 96-10474 Filed 4-26-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 69 (Tuesday, April 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 18423]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8866]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION
[Finance Docket No. 32633]


Hollidaysburg and Roaring Spring Railroad Company--Acquisition 
and Operation Exemption--Consolidated Rail Corporation

    Hollidaysburg and Roaring Spring Railroad Company (HRS), a 
noncarrier, has filed a notice of exemption to acquire and operate 
approximately 10.2 miles of rail line (a portion of the Cove Running 
Track) owned by Consolidated Rail Corporation, extending from milepost 
8.0 at Hollidaysburg, PA, to milepost 18.2 at Roaring Spring, PA.
    This proceeding is related to Alan W. Maples--Continuance in 
Control Exemption--Hollidaysburg and Roaring Spring Railroad Company, 
Finance Docket No. 32631, wherein Alan W. Maples has concurrently filed 
a petition for exemption to continue control of HRS when it becomes a 
rail carrier upon consummation of the transactions described in this 
notice.\1\ Also, related to this proceeding is Everett Railroad 
Company--Trackage Rights Exemption--Hollidaysburg and Roaring Spring 
Railroad Company, Finance Docket No. 32632, wherein HRS has agreed to 
grant overhead trackage rights to Everett Railroad Company once it 
acquires the line in question.

    \1\Alan W. Maples, the controlling stockholder of HRS, does not 
qualify for a class exemption under 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(2) because of 
his controlling ownership of two connecting carriers (HRS and 
Everett Railroad Company). Mr. Maples has established a voting trust 
to insulate himself from unauthorized acquisition of control of HRS 
until the petition for exemption for control is acted upon.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Any comments must be filed with the Commission and served on Robert 
A. Wimbish, Rea, Cross & Auchincloss, 1920 N Street, N.W., Suite 420, 
Washington, D.C. 20036.
    This notice is filed under 49 CFR 1150.31. If the notice contains 
false or misleading information, the exemption is void ab initio. 
Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10505(d) may be filed 
at any time. The filing of a petition to revoke will not automatically 
stay the transaction.

    Decided: April 4, 1995.

    By the Commission, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-8866 Filed 4-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7035-01-P
Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FSP Galleria North Corp.
(the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned,
George J. Carter, President and principal executive officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

            (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


Date:  August 11, 2006                         /s/ George J. Carter
                                               ------------------------
                                               George J. Carter
                                               President
                                               (Principal Executive Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Integrated Preclinical/Clinical AIDS Vaccine Development Program (IPCAVD) (U19 Clinical Trial Not Allowed).                    

*Date:*                         June 30, 2021.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G36, Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Poonam Pegu, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, DEA/NIAID/NIH/DHHS, 5601 Fishers Lane, MSC-9823, Rockville, MD 20892, 240-292-0719,                         *poonam.pegu@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: May 28, 2021.

Tyeshia M. Roberson,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-11711 Filed 6-3-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION

(pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2010 of Subsea 7 S.A. (the Company) as filed
with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Jean P. Cahuzac, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |                                        
|------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------
|Date: March 2,2011 |  | /s/ Jean P. Cahuzac                    
|                   |  | Jean P. Cahuzac Chief Executive Officer
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 14

- 00315

- CV

In the Estate of Laverne (Toby) Smith, Deceased

On Appeal from the County Court of Lavaca County , Texas Trial Cause No. 10693

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on

a ppeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant.
We further order this decision certified below for observance. September 1, 2015