Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 83 / Monday, April 29, 1996 / Proposed Rules 18711

39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations

(14 CFR part 39) as follows:

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS

DIRECTIVES

1. The authority citation for part 39

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 USC 106(g), 40113, 44701.

§ 39.13 [Amended]

2. Section 39.13 is amended by

adding the following new airworthiness

directive:

Airbus Industrie: Docket 95–NM–237–AD.

Applicability: Model A320 series airplanes,

manufacturer’s serial numbers 129 through

343 inclusive, 345 through 347 inclusive, and

349 through 363 inclusive; certificated in any

category.

Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane

identified in the preceding applicability

provision, regardless of whether it has been

modified, altered, or repaired in the area

subject to the requirements of this AD. For

airplanes that have been modified, altered, or

repaired so that the performance of the

requirements of this AD is affected, the

owner/operator must request approval for an

alternative method of compliance in

accordance with paragraph (b) of this AD.

The request should include an assessment of

the effect of the modification, alteration, or

repair on the unsafe condition addressed by

this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not

been eliminated, the request should include

specific proposed actions to address it.

Compliance: Required as indicated, unless

accomplished previously.

To ensure that the proper P-clips are

installed, accomplish the following:

(a) Within 6 months after the effective date

of this AD, perform a one-time inspection to

detect damage to the electrical wiring and to

verify if the proper P-clip is installed in the

electrical wiring at outboard rib 6 in the

inner cell of the fuel tank of the wings, in

accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin

A320–28–1052, Revision 2, dated September

8, 1994.

Note 2: Accomplishment of the actions

specified in this paragraph in accordance

with Airbus Service Bulletin A320–28–1052,

Revision 1, dated July 7, 1993, prior to the

effective date of this AD is considered

acceptable for compliance with this

paragraph.

(1) If any damage is detected to the wiring,

prior to further flight, repair it in accordance

with the Airplane Wiring Manual.

(2) If a P-clip having P/N NSA5515–03NF

or NSA5516–03NV is installed, prior to

further flight, re-fit it in accordance with the

service bulletin.

(3) If a P-clip having P/N NSA5516–03NJ

is installed, prior to further flight, replace it

with a new fuel-resistant P-clip having P/N

NSA5515–03NF or NSA5516–03NV, in

accordance with the service bulletin.

(b) An alternative method of compliance or

adjustment of the compliance time that

provides an acceptable level of safety may be

used if approved by the Manager,

Standardization Branch, ANM–113, FAA,

Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators

shall submit their requests through an

appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance

Inspector, who may add comments and then

send it to the Manager, Standardization

Branch, ANM–113.

Note 3: Information concerning the

existence of approved alternative methods of

compliance with this AD, if any, may be

obtained from the Standardization Branch,

ANM–113.

(c) Special flight permits may be issued in

accordance with sections 21.197 and 21.199

of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR

21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to

a location where the requirements of this AD

can be accomplished.

Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 23,

1996.

S.R. Miller,

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.

[FR Doc. 96–10504 Filed 4–26–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[WI57–01–7105b, WI58–01–7106b, WI59–01–

7107b; FRL–5424–3]

Proposed Approval of State

Implementation Plan; Wisconsin

Gasoline Storage Tank Vent Pipe,

Traffic Marking Materials, and Solvent

Metal Cleaning SIP Revisions

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: The EPA is proposing to

approve, through the direct final

procedure, a revision to the Wisconsin

State Implementation Plan (SIP) for

ozone that was submitted on June 14,

1995. This revision consists of a volatile

organic compound (VOC) regulation to

control emissions from the following

sources: gasoline storage tanks, traffic

marking materials, and solvent metal

cleaning operations. These regulations

were submitted to generate reductions

in VOC emissions, which the State will

use to fulfill the 15 percent requirement

of the amended Clean Air Act. In the

final rules of this Federal Register, the

EPA is approving this action as a direct

final without prior proposal because

EPA views this as a noncontroversial

action and anticipates no adverse

comments. If no adverse comments are

received in response to that direct final

rule, no further activity is contemplated

in relation to this proposed rule. If EPA

receives adverse comments, the direct

final rule will be withdrawn and all

public comments received will be

addressed in a subsequent final rule

based on this proposed rule. The EPA

will not institute a second comment

period on this action. Any parties

interested in commenting on this

document should do so at this time.

DATES: Comments on this proposed

action must be received by May 29,

1996.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should

be sent to: Carlton T. Nash, Chief,

Regulation Development Section, Air

Toxics and Radiation Branch (AT–18J),

EPA, Region 5, 77 West Jackson

Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604–

3590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Douglas Aburano (312) 353–6960.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For

additional information, see the direct

final rule which is located in the Rules

section of this Federal Register. Copies

of the request and the EPA’s analysis are

available for inspection at the following

address: (Please telephone Douglas

Aburano at (312) 353–6960 before

visiting the Region 5 office.) EPA,

Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77

West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,

Illinois 60604–3590.

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401–7671q.

Dated: November 6, 1995.

Valdas V. Adamkus,

Regional Administrator.

[FR Doc. 96–10450 Filed 4–26–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 96–78; RM–8778]

Radio Broadcasting Services;

Hicksville, OH

AGENCY: Federal Communications

Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: The Commission requests

comments on a petition filed by Lake

Cities Broadcasting Corporation seeking

the allotment of Channel 294A to

Hicksville, Ohio, as the community’s

first local aural transmission service.

Channel 294A can be allotted to

Hicksville in compliance with the

Commission’s minimum distance

separation requirements with a site

restriction of 5.4 kilometers (3.4 miles)

northeast, at coordinates 41–19–35 NL

and 84–43–03 WL, to avoid a shortspacing to Station WMRI, Channel

295B, Marion, Indiana. Canadian

concurrence in the allotment is required
18712 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 83 / Monday, April 29, 1996 / Proposed Rules

since Hicksville is located within 320

kilometers (200 miles) of the U.S.-

Canadian border.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or

before June 13, 1996, and reply

comments on or before June 28, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications

Commission, Washington, DC 20554. In

addition to filing comments with the

FCC, interested parties should serve the

petitioner, or its counsel or consultant,

as follows: Richard J. Hayes, Esq., 13809

Black Meadow Road, Greenwood

Plantation, Spotsylvania, VA 22553

(Counsel to petitioner).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Leslie K. Shapiro, Mass Media Bureau,

(202) 418–2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a

synopsis of the Commission’s Notice of

Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No.

96–78, adopted March 19, 1996, and

released April 22, 1996. The full text of

this Commission decision is available

for inspection and copying during

normal business hours in the FCC

Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M

Street, NW., Washington, DC. The

complete text of this decision may also

be purchased from the Commission’s

copy contractor, International

Transcription Services, Inc., (202) 857–

3800, 2100 M Street, NW., Suite 140,

Washington, DC 20037.

Provisions of the Regulatory

Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply to

this proceeding.

Members of the public should note

that from the time a Notice of Proposed

Rule Making is issued until the matter

is no longer subject to Commission

consideration or court review, all ex

parte contacts are prohibited in

Commission proceedings, such as this

one, which involve channel allotments.

See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules

governing permissible ex parte contacts.

For information regarding proper

filing procedures for comments, see 47

CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.

John A. Karousos,

Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules

Division, Mass Media Bureau.

[FR Doc. 96–10442 Filed 4–26–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712–01–F

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 96–3; RM–8735]

Radio Broadcasting Services;

Imboden, AR

AGENCY: Federal Communications

Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule; dismissal.

SUMMARY: This document dismisses a

petition filed on behalf of John J.

Shields, which requested the allotment

of Channel 289A to Imboden, Arkansas,

as that community’s first local aural

transmission service, based upon the

lack of an expression of interest in

pursuing the proposal by the petitioner

or any other party. See 61 FR 4393,

February 6, 1996. With this action, the

proceeeding is terminated.

DATE: This dismissal is made on April

29, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Nancy Joyner, Mass Media Bureau, (202)

418–2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a

synopsis of the Commission’s Report

and Order, MM Docket No. 96–3,

adopted April 4, 1996, and released

April 23, 1996. The full text of this

Commission decision is available for

inspection and copying during normal

business hours in the FCC’s Reference

Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW.,

Washington, DC. The complete text of

this decision may also be purchased

from the Commission’s copy

contractors, International Transcription

Service, Inc., (202) 857–3800, 2100 M

Street, NW., Suite 140, Washington, DC

20037.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.

John A. Karousos,

Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules

Division, Mass Media Bureau.

[FR Doc. 96–10436 Filed 4–26–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712–01–F

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 96–81; RM–8776]

Radio Broadcasting Services; Rosalia,

KS

AGENCY: Federal Communications

Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: The Commission requests

comments on a petition by Randall L.

Hughes requesting the allotment of

Channel 234A to Rosalia, Kansas.

Channel 234A can be allotted to Rosalia

in compliance with the Commission’s

minimum distance separation

requirements without the imposition of

a site restriction. The coordinates for

Channel 234A at Rosalia are 37–48–54

and 96–37–12.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or

before June 13, 1996, and reply

comments on or before June 28, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications

Commission, Washington, DC 20554. In

addition to filing comments with the

FCC, interested parties should serve the

petitioner, or its counsel or consultant,

as follows: Randall L. Hughes, 425 1/2

N. Star, El Dorado, Kansas 67042

(petitioner).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pam

Blumenthal, Mass Media Bureau, (202)

418–2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a

synopsis of the Commission’s Notice of

Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No.

96–81, adopted March 20, 1996, and

released April 22, 1996. The full text of

this Commission decision is available

for inspection and copying during

normal business hours in the FCC’s

Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M

Street, NW., Washington, DC. The

complete text of this decision may also

be purchased from the Commission’s

copy contractor, ITS, Inc., (202) 857–

3800, 2100 M Street, NW., Suite 140,

Washington, DC 20037.

Provisions of the Regulatory

Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply to

this proceeding.

Members of the public should note

that from the time a Notice of Proposed

Rule Making is issued until the matter

is no longer subject to Commission

consideration or court review, all ex

parte contacts are prohibited in

Commission proceedings, such as this

one, which involve channel allotments.

See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules

governing permissible ex parte contacts.

For information regarding proper

filing procedures for comments, see 47

CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.

John A. Karousos,

Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules

Division, Mass Media Bureau.

[FR Doc. 96–10441 Filed 4–26–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712–01–F