alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5661 

To amend the microloan program of the Small Business Act to define State, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 21, 2023 

Mr. SABLAN (for himself and Mrs. RADEWAGEN) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Small Business 

A BILL 

To amend the microloan program of the Small Business 

Act to define State, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Northern Mariana Is5 lands Entrepreneurship Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MICROLOAN PROGRAM; DEFINITIONS. 

7 Paragraph (11) of section 7(m) of the Small Business 

8 Act (15 U.S.C. 636(m)(11)) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5661 IH

1 (1) in clause (ii) of subparagraph (C), by strik2 ing ‘‘rural’’ and all that follows through the end of 

3 the clause and inserting ‘‘rural;’’; 

4 (2) in subparagraph (D), by striking the period 

5 at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

6 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub7 paragraph: 

8 ‘‘(E) the term ‘State’ means each of the 

9 several States, the District of Columbia, the 

10 Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Is11 lands of the United States, Guam, the Com12 monwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, 

13 and American Samoa.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 31.2

                  Certification of Principal Financial Officer
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


I, Anthony Coletti certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of TRAFALGAR
RESOURCES, INC.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have;

          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

          (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

          (c) Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;


     5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

          (a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors, any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

          (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

     6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: May 15, 2007          /s/ Anthony Coletti
                            --------------------------------
                             Chief Accounting Officer
#### Arthur W. CARSON, Relator, v. The Honorable William McADAMS, Presiding Judge of the 12th District Court of Walker County, Texas, Respondent.

No. 01-93-00472-CV.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.).

July 29, 1993.

Arthur Carson, Huntsville, for relator.

John B. Holmes, Houston, for respondent.

Before COHEN, O’CONNOR and HEDGES, JJ.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Relator, a prison inmate, sued the warden and other employees of the state prison. The attorney general answered for the defendants, and moved to dismiss the suit as frivolous. Relator then moved to recuse the respondent trial judge, who neither referred the motion for hearing nor recused himself, but instead proceeded to hear and grant defendants’ motion to dismiss. We reversed and remanded. *Carson v. Gomez,*841 S.W.2d 491 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, no writ).

Following remand, Judge McAdams complied with this Court’s mandate, by referring relator’s motion to recuse, and requesting that the presiding judge of the administrative district assign another judge to hear relator’s motion. On February 5, 1993, a visiting judge, the Honorable H.D. Black, Jr., heard and denied relator’s motion to recuse Judge McAdams. Shortly thereafter, relator filed a second motion to recuse Judge McAdams. The attorney general then filed a motion for sanctions against plaintiff, based on statements contained in relator’s second motion to recuse.

The attorney general’s response to relator’s petition for writ of mandamus shows that Judge McAdams granted the motion for sanctions while relator’s second motion for recusal was still pending. Relator asserts that the order imposing sanctions was an abuse of discretion. We agree.

The second motion for recusal was filed on or about February 16, 1993, after a hearing had been held on relator’s first motion to recuse. The second motion alleged new grounds for recusal, i.e., that Judge Mc-Adams sat on the advisory board of the prison museum and thus had a conflict of interest. In granting the sanctions sought by the attorney general, Judge McAdams ruled that relator’s second motion for recusal was “groundless, false, brought in bad faith, and harassing.” This was error.

Even if the finding is correct, a ruling on the merits of a recusal motion must be made by some other judge than the one whose recusal is sought. Tex.R.Civ.P. 18a. Moreover, the judge sought to be recused “shall make no further orders and shall take no further action in the case after the filing of the motion and prior to a hearing on the motion,” except for good cause stated in the *229order in which farther action is taken. *Id.*No good cause is stated in the sanctions order. Thus, we order that it be set aside. We further order that the second motion to recuse be referred to the presiding judge of the administrative district for action, in compliance with TexR.Civ.P. 18a(c), (d). *See Carson,*841 S.W.2d at 498.

We conditionally grant the writ of mandamus. We are confident respondent will vacate the sanctions order and refer the second recusal motion, in conformity with rule 18a. The writ will issue only if he fails to do so.
#### Sandra L. WOLFE, Appellant, v. DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, Respondent.

No. WD 52057.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

July 23, 1996.

Sandra L. Wolfe, Independence, Appellant Pro Se.

Ronnae L. Coleman, Kansas City, for respondent.

Before LAURA DENVIR STITH, P. J., and ULRICH and SMART, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant-Claimant Sandra L. Wolfe appeals from an order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying unemployment benefits on the ground that she left her employment voluntarily without good cause attributable to the work or the employer.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and determine that the order of the Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. Because a published opinion *258would have no precedential value, we affirm by this summary order under Rule 84.16(b). We have furnished the parties with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth our reasoning.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

          I, Martin Tuchman, certify that:

          1.       I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Interpool, Inc.;

          2.       Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

          3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this report;

          4.       The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant andhave:

                    (a)     Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

                    (b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant'sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

                    (c)     Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financialreporting; and

          5.       The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the Audit Committee ofthe registrant's Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

                    (a)     All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financialdata; and

                    (b)     Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant's internal control over financialreporting.

Date:  August 16, 2004
Exhibit 23.1

LOGO

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors

Mountain Bank Holding Company

Enumclaw, WA 98022

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement No. 33-61782 on Form S-8 of Mountain Bank Holding Companyof our report dated February 27, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Mountain
Bank Holding Company as of December 31, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2005, which report is
included herein.

/S/    MCGLADREY &
PULLEN, LLP

Seattle, Washington

March 23, 2007
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certification of CEO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of First State
Bancorporation, a New Mexico corporation (the Company), for the period ended
December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Michael R. Stanford, as President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best
of my knowledge:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to First State Bancorporation and will be retained by First State
Bancorporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request. /s/ Michael R. Stanford

Michael R. Stanford
President and Chief Executive Officer
March 12, 2004
 This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                  In connection with the Quarterly Report of CenterPoint Energy
Transition Bond Company II, LLC (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2006 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, Marc Kilbride, Vice President and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of my knowledge, that:

                  1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

                  2.       The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

/s/ Marc Kilbride
-------------------------------
Marc Kilbride
Vice President and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)
May 12, 2006
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, David Stadnyk, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	the report on Form 10-QSB of Park Place Energy Corp. for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Park Place Energy Corp.

Date: November 14, 2007

/s/ David Stadnyk	David Stadnyk 
President, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Anpath Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), each of the undersigned J. Lloyd Breedlove, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Stephen Hoelscher, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge that:



(a) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(b) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



|                        |  |        |                                                       | 
|----------------------- |  | ------ | ----------------------------------------------------- | 
|                        |  |        |                                                       | 
|Date: February 13, 2008 |  | By:    | /s/ J. Lloyd Breedlove                                | 
|                        |  | Name:  | J. Lloyd Breedlove                                    | 
|                        |  | Title: | Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|                        |  |        |                                                      



|                        |  |        |                                                       | 
|----------------------- |  | ------ | ----------------------------------------------------- | 
|                        |  |        |                                                       | 
|Date: February 13, 2008 |  | By:    | /s/ Stephen Hoelscher                                 | 
|                        |  | Name:  | Stephen Hoelscher                                     | 
|                        |  | Title: | Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification will not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**StationCasinos, Inc.Certification Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)**

Pursuant to therequirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.Sections 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certify as follows:

1.                Frank J. FertittaIII is the Chief Executive Officer of the Company (the “Company”).

2.                The undersignedcertifies to the best of his knowledge:

(A)       The Company’s Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2005 accompanying this Certification, inthe form filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”); and

(B)        Theinformation in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

**Dated:  March 14, 2006**

| ** ** | **/s/**Frank J.  Fertitta III |
|------------|-------------------------------|
| ** ** | Frank J. Fertitta III         |
| ** ** | *Chairman of the Board and*   |
| ** ** | *Chief Executive Officer*     |

 

----
Exhibit
32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002







In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FSP Galleria North Corp.
(the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned, Barbara J. Fournier, Chief Operating Officer and principal
financial officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that, to her knowledge:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.











Date:  November
      14, 2008
            /s/ Barbara J.
      Fournier
              Barbara
      J. Fournier
              Chief Operating
      Officer
              (Principal Financial
      Officer)
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 26, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-6909

BorgWarner Emissions Systems:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
Exhibit 12.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Stuart Jackson, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Acergy S.A.; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |                        
|------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                    |  | 
|Date: June 21, 2007 |  |  |  | /S/    STUART JACKSON  
|                    |  |  |  | Stuart Jackson         
|                    |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer