alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 80 (Wednesday, April 24, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18183-18184]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10049]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Receipt of Petition for Director's Decision Under 10 CFR 2.206

    Notice is hereby given that by letter dated March 5, 1996, Mr. C. 
Morris submitted a Petition pursuant to 10 CFR 2.206 requesting that 
the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take action with regard to 
all nuclear power plants.
    The Petitioner requests that, within 90 days, the operating 
licenses of all nuclear power plants be suspended until such time as 
those licensees have discovered the reasons for the repeated errors in 
their electrical distribution system designs and in their undervoltage 
relay (UVR) set points, and provided convincing evidence that these 
deficiencies have been corrected. Since the Petitioner asserts that the 
situation is urgent, the request is being treated as one for immediate 
relief. The Petitioner also requests that the aforementioned evidence 
be submitted for review by a competent third party, and that if the NRC 
finds that licensees may safely operate with UVRs that do not remain 
properly set, it should do so in the context of a public meeting.
    The Petition is being treated pursuant to 10 CFR 2.206 of the 
Commission's regulations and has been referred to the Director of the 
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. As provided by Section 2.206, 
appropriate action will be taken

[[Page 18184]]

on this petition within a reasonable time.
    By letter dated April 17, 1996, the Director denied the 
Petitioner's request for immediate suspension of the operating licenses 
for all nuclear power plants. A copy of the Petition is available for 
inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room, the Gelman 
Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 17th day of April, 1996.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
William T. Russell,
Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 96-10049 Filed 4-23-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
1 The Honorable John F. Forster, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). ___________ No. 95-1773

___________ Bertha J. Washington, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Veterans Administration, * Secretary, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: February 5, 1996 Filed: February 16, 1996

___________ Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.
Bertha J. Washington appeals the district court's 1 judgment for defendant following a bench trial in her action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq . Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude that no error of law or fact appears and that an opinion would lack precedential value.
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.-2- A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
# Missouri Court of Appeals

Southern District

JULY 17, 2014

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b).

1. Case No. SD32961

Re: JAMES A. BRADDY,

Appellant,

vs. STATE OF MISSOURI,

Respondent.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 105 (Thursday, June 3, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 29809]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-11701]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service\TM\.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: June 3, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
May 14, 2021, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 700 to Competitive Product List. 
Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2021-92, CP2021-
95.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2021-11701 Filed 6-2-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 70 (Wednesday, April 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18587-18588]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9021]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE


AmeriCorps*NCCC's Proposal for an Information Collection Form

AGENCY: Corporation for National and Community Service.

ACTION: Information collection request submitted to the Federal Office 
of Management and Budget (FOMB) for review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice provides information about an information 
collection proposal by AmeriCorps*National Civilian Community Corps 
(NCCC), currently under review by the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB).

DATES: OMB and AmeriCorps*NCCC will consider comments on the proposed 
collection of information and recordkeeping requirements received 
before May 12, 1995. Copies of the proposed forms and supporting 
documents may be obtained by contacting AmeriCorps*NCCC.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to both--Dan Chenok, Desk Officer, Office of 
Management and Budget, 3002 New Executive Office Building, Washington, 
DC 20503. Donald L. Scott, Director, AmeriCorps*NCCC, 1201 New York 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20525.

[[Page 18588]] FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kate Becker (202) 606-5000 x 149, Corporation for National Service, 
AmeriCorps*NCCC, 1201 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20525.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 3517 of the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1980 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 3517) requires that the Director of OMB 
provide interested Federal agencies and persons an early opportunity to 
comment on information collection requests.

Office of Action Issuing Proposal: AmeriCorps*NCCC.
Title of Forms: Applicant Medical Prescreening Form.
Need and Use: This information is used for program management, 
planning, and required recordkeeping.
Type of Request: Submission of new collection.
Respondent's Obligation to Reply: Required to receive benefits.
Frequency of Collection: One time per selected applicant.
Estimated Number of Response: 2,000.
Average Burden Hours Per Response: .5 hours (reporting and 
recordkeeping).
Estimated Annual Reporting or Disclosure Burden: 500 hours.
Regulatory Authority: The National and Community Service Act of 1990, 
as amended.

    Dated: March 30, 1995.
Donald L. Scott,
Vice President, Corporation for National Service and Director, 
AmeriCorps*National Civilian Community Corps.
[FR Doc. 95-9021 Filed 4-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6050-28-M
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5538 

To amend title 5 of the United States Code to provide special overtime 

pay for certain border patrol agents, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2023 

Mr. TONY GONZALES of Texas introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To amend title 5 of the United States Code to provide 

special overtime pay for certain border patrol agents, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF HIGHER RATES OF REGU4 LARLY SCHEDULED OVERTIME PAY FOR 

5 UNITED STATES BORDER PATROL AGENTS 

6 CLASSIFIED AT GS–12. 

7 Section 5550 of title 5, United States Code, is 

8 amended by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(h) SPECIAL OVERTIME PAY FOR GS–12 BORDER

10 PATROL AGENTS.— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5538 IH

1 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding para2 graphs (1)(F), (2)(C), and (3)(C) of subsection (b), 

3 a border patrol agent encumbering a position at 

4 grade GS–12 shall receive a special overtime pay5 ment under this subsection for hours of regularly 

6 scheduled work described in paragraph (2)(A)(ii) or 

7 (3)(A)(ii) of subsection (b), as applicable, that are 

8 credited to the agent through actual performance of 

9 work, crediting under rules for canine agents under 

10 subsection (b)(1)(F), or substitution of overtime 

11 hours in the same work period under subsection 

12 (f)(2)(A), except that no such payment may be made 

13 for periods of absence resulting in an hours obliga14 tion under paragraph (3) or (4) of subsection (f). 

15 ‘‘(2) COMPUTATION.—The special overtime pay16 ment authorized under paragraph (1) shall be com17 puted by multiplying the credited hours by 50 per18 cent of the border patrol agent’s hourly rate of basic 

19 pay, rounded to the nearest cent. 

20 ‘‘(3) LIMITATIONS.—The special overtime pay21 ment authorized under paragraph (1)— 

22 ‘‘(A) is not considered basic pay for retire23 ment under section 8331(3) or 8401(4) or for 

24 any other purpose; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 5538 IH

1 ‘‘(B) is not payable during periods of paid 

2 leave or other paid time off; and 

3 ‘‘(C) is not considered in computing an 

4 agent’s lump-sum annual leave payment under 

5 sections 5551 and 5552.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE OF MARYLAND * COURT OF APPEALS * OF MARYLAND Petitioner V. AVROHOM REUVEN POUPKO Respondent • Misc. Docket AG • No. 0045 • September Term, 2015

• In the Circuit Court • for Baltimore City • Case No. 24-C-15-005416 ********************************************* ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION • IN THE OF MARYLAND • COURT OF APPEALS • OF MARYLAND Petitioner • Misc. Docket AG v. • No. 0001 • September Term, 2016 AVROHOM REUVEN POUPKO In the Circuit Court Respondent • for Baltimore City • Case No. 24-C-16-001751 *********************************************

ORDER Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-736, in which Respondent admits he committed professional misconduct in violation of Rules 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.15(a) and (d), 8.1(b), 8.4(a) and (d), of the Maryland Lawyers' Rules of Professional Conduct, which were the rules in effect at the time of this misconduct, it is this 16thday of August ,2016, ORDERED, that Respondent, Avrohom Reuven Poupko, be and he is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Avrohom Reuven Poupko from the register of attorneys in the Court, notify Respondent in accordance with Maryland Rule 119-742(a), and issue notice of such action in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-761(b).



### /s/ Clayton Greene Jr. Senior Judge

2
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Annual Report of Stone Field Management  Company
on Form  10-KSB for the  period  ending  December  31,  2003,  as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, B.
Stephen Bailey, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/S/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President, Director
(Principal Executive Officer)


April 19, 2004


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5426 

To require the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to provide 

a link to resources for submitting reports on suspected fraud relating 

to certain COVID–19 loans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 13, 2023 

Ms. VAN DUYNE (for herself and Mr. LANDSMAN) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Small Business 

A BILL 

To require the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to provide a link to resources for submitting 

reports on suspected fraud relating to certain COVID– 

19 loans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. WEBSITE TO REPORT FRAUD RELATING TO 

4 CERTAIN COVID–19 LOANS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the 

6 date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator of 

7 the Small Business Administration shall include on the 

8 primary website of the Administration a link to a website 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5426 IH

1 of the Office of the Inspector General of the Small Busi2 ness Administration regarding reporting fraud, waste, 

3 abuse, mismanagement, and misconduct, and containing 

4 a resource for individuals to report suspected cases of 

5 fraud with respect to a covered loan to the Administration. 

6 (b) COVERED LOAN DEFINED.—In this section, the 

7 term ‘‘covered loan’’ means— 

8 (1) a loan made under paragraph (36) or (37) 

9 of section 7(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 

10 636(a)); or 

11 (2) a loan made under section 7(b) of such Act 

12 (15 U.S.C. 636(b)) in response to COVID–19 dur13 ing the covered period (as defined in section 1110(a) 

14 of the CARES Act (15 U.S.C. 9009)). 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of PremierWest Bancorp (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James M.
Ford, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the period
certified.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This certification is being furnished solely to comply with the requirements of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any of the Companys filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise be deemed to be filed as part of the Report or under such
Acts.



|                     |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: March 16, 2011 |  | /s/ JAMES M. FORD                    
|                     |  | James M. Ford                        
|                     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                     |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
#### Kevin and Mary BRENNAN, Plaintiffs/Respondents, v. REHNQUIST DESIGN AND BUILD, INC., Defendant/Appellant.

No. 67844.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

Feb. 13, 1996.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 25, 1996.

William A. Boles, St. Louis, for appellant.

Joseph V. Neill, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before CRAHAN, P.J., and CRANDALL and DOWD, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Rehnquist Design and Build Inc., appeals from both a $4,100.00 judgment entered against it on Respondents’ trespass claim and an adverse judgment on its counterclaim for trespass. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the transcript and the legal file and find no error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the trial court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 83 (Monday, April 29, 1996)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 18712]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10441]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 96-81; RM-8776]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Rosalia, KS

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission requests comments on a petition by Randall L. 
Hughes requesting the allotment of Channel 234A to Rosalia, Kansas. 
Channel 234A can be allotted to Rosalia in compliance with the 
Commission's minimum distance separation requirements without the 
imposition of a site restriction. The coordinates for Channel 234A at 
Rosalia are 37-48-54 and 96-37-12.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before June 13, 1996, and reply 
comments on or before June 28, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 20554. In 
addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should 
serve the petitioner, or its counsel or consultant, as follows: Randall 
L. Hughes, 425 1/2 N. Star, El Dorado, Kansas 67042 (petitioner).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pam Blumenthal, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 96-81, adopted March 20, 
1996, and released April 22, 1996. The full text of this Commission 
decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business 
hours in the FCC's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW., 
Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, ITS, Inc., (202) 857-
3800, 2100 M Street, NW., Suite 140, Washington, DC 20037.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 96-10441 Filed 4-26-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 4, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 458-459]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-88]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Michael J. Corliss; Change in Bank Control Notice


Acquisition of Shares of Banks or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificant listed below has applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank 
[[Page 459]] holding company. The factors that are considered in acting 
on notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 
1817(j)(7)).
    The notice is available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. Once the notice has been accepted for 
processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices of 
the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in 
writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for the notice or to the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than 
January 17, 1995.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Kenneth R. Binning, 
Director, Bank Holding Company) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, 
California 94105:
    1. Michael J. Corliss (through the Corliss Valley Bancorporation 
Trust), Sumner, Washington; to acquire 14.10 percent of the voting 
shares of Valley Bancorporation, Sumner, Washington, and thereby 
indirectly acquire Bank of Sumner, Sumner, Washington.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 28, 
1994.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-88 Filed 1-3-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
#### CITY OF INDEPENDENCE, Respondent, v. GHF, INC., Appellant.

No. WD 50465.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Nov. 14, 1995.

Steven E. Mauer, Bryan Cave, L.L.P., Kansas City, William B. Moore, Counselor, Independence, for respondent.

*396Leonard L. Meyer, Independence, for appellant.

Before LAURA DENVIR STITH, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and ULRICH, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from the granting of summary judgment making absolute a permanent injunction against GHF to refrain from encroaching on an existing easement in favor of Independence for a water main. Rule 84.16(b).