alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w1



 




EXHIBIT 10.1




InfraSource Services, Inc. Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan





     Under the current Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan of InfraSource Services, Inc., each
non-employee director is entitled to receive:




	 	•	 	an annual retainer fee of $25,000 for each non-employee director;
	 
	 	•	 	an additional annual retainer of $25,000 for serving as Chairman of the Board of
Directors or Lead Director;
	 
	 	•	 	an annual retainer of $7,500 for each non-chairman member serving on the Audit
Committee and an additional annual retainer of $2,500 for serving as Chairman of the
Audit Committee;
	 
	 	•	 	an annual retainer of $5,000 for each non-chairman member serving on the
Compensation Committee and an additional annual retainer of $2,500 for serving as
Chairman of the Compensation Committee;
	 
	 	•	 	an annual retainer of $5,000 for serving on the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee and an additional annual retainer of $2,500 for serving as Chairman of the
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee;
	 
	 	•	 	an annual retainer of $5,000 for serving on any other committee of the Board;
	 
	 	•	 	each director elected to the Board for the first time shall receive a restricted
stock award; and
	 
	 	•	 	each director elected Chairman of the Board for the first time shall receive an
additional restricted stock award.
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of EarthLink, Inc.
(the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kevin
M. Dotts, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:  (1)the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.   /s/ KEVIN M. DOTTS  Kevin
M. Dotts
Chief Financial Officer
February 27, 2009
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 11432]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad pursuant to agreements with their foreign owners or custodians for temporary display in the exhibition “Monet at Étretat” at the Seattle Art Museum, Seattle, Washington, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Chi D. Tran, Program Administrator, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 257-1 of December 11, 2015.                

Aleisha Woodward,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy,  Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2021-11790 Filed 6-3-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
----

|                                                                            |   | Three      MonthsEndedDecember 31, 2008 |       |   | Three      MonthsEndedDecember 31, 2007 |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|--------|
| Net      Income                                                                 |   | $                                       | 975        |   |                                    | $      | 1,173 |   |
| Weighted      average common shares outstanding for computation of basic    EPS |   |                                    | 12,685,436 |   |                                    |   | 12,953,525 |   |
|                                                                            |   |                                    |       |   |                                    |   |   |   |
| Dilutive      common-equivalent shares                                          |   |                                    | 20,527     |   |                                    |   | 53,944 |   |
| Weighted      average common shares for computation of diluted EPS              |   |                                    | 12,705,963 |   |                                    |   | 13,007,469 |   |
|                                                                            |   |                                    |       |   |                                    |   |   |   |
| Earnings      per common share:                                                 |   |                                    |       |   |                                    |   |   |   |
|                                                                            |   |                                    |       |   |                                    |   |   |   |
| Basic                                                                           |   | $                                       | 0.08       |   |                                    | $      | 0.09 |   |
|                                                                            |   |                                    |       |   |                                    |   |   |   |
| Diluted                                                                         |   | $                                       | 0.08       |   |                                    | $      | 0.09 |   |
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5509 

AN ACT 

To modernize permitting systems at the Department of the 

Interior, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5509 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Electronic Permitting 

3 Modernization Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR PERMIT ACCESSI5 BILITY. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—In order to improve the overall 

7 economy, efficiency, and management of operations and 

8 activities of the Department of the Interior (referred to 

9 in this section as the ‘‘Department’’), reduce paperwork, 

10 and provide high-quality services and access to the public, 

11 the Secretary of the Interior shall, to the extent prac12 ticable— 

13 (1) design and deliver modernized electronic 

14 permitting systems to accept, process, and record 

15 applications (including plan submissions, payment 

16 activity, and other related correspondence) for per17 mits, forms, and other paperwork required for activi18 ties regulated by the Department; 

19 (2) provide a centralized electronic permitting 

20 system online repository, available to the public on 

21 the Department’s website, that includes— 

22 (A) hyperlinks to facilitate navigation to 

23 all Department electronic permitting systems; 

24 and 

25 (B) with respect to permits, the contact in26 formation for the appropriate Department em-
3 

•HR 5509 EH

1 ployees providing assistance to State, Tribal, 

2 and local governments; and 

3 (3) provide to the Committee on Natural Re4 sources of the House of Representatives and the 

5 Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the 

6 Senate periodic updates on the implementation of 

7 paragraphs (1) and (2). 

8 (b) DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION PROHIBITED.— 

9 No information described in section 552(b) of title 5, 

10 United States Code, or protected from disclosure by an11 other law of the United States shall be disclosed under 

12 this Act. 

13 (c) DUPLICATION OF SYSTEMS NOT PERMITTED.— 

14 No system shall be duplicated under this Act. 

15 (d) CONSULTATION.—In developing the permitting 

16 systems required under section 2 of this Act, the Secretary 

17 of the Interior shall consult with States, local govern18 ments, Indian Tribes and other stakeholders who apply 

19 for agency permits and will use the permitting systems. 

20 SEC. 3. CONFORMING AMENDMENT TO ENSURE CONSIST21 ENCY WITH THE FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY 

22 ACT OF 2023. 

23 In developing the permitting systems required under 

24 section 2 of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall 

25 ensure that the Department’s electronic permitting sys-
4 

•HR 5509 EH

1 tems are consistent with the priorities identified in section 

2 110 of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 

3 U.S.C. 4336d) with respect to any permit that requires 

4 review under that Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 24, 

2024. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5509 

AN ACT 

To modernize permitting systems at the 

Department of the Interior, and for other purposes.
#### In re the Matter of Michelle HOLLIS, et al., a minor. SOUTHWESTERN BELL CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. The ESTATE OF Adell HOLLIS, et al., Defendants.

No. 65104.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

Dec. 27, 1994.

Richard B. Blanke, Uthoff, Graeber, Bobi-nette & O’Keefe, St. Louis, for appellant.

Bert L. Gates, Kuelker, Gates & Sehau-mann, P.C., St. Louis, for respondent.

Before AHRENS, P.J., and SIMON and KAROHL, JJ.

*MEMORANDUM DECISION*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Mary Ann Citchen (trustee), appeals the trial court’s order terminating the testamentary trust of Adell Hollis (decedent) as to one of the beneficiaries, Derrie Hollis, Jr. (Derrie) and permitting Derrie to retain trust funds that were distributed to him earlier. Decedent drafted her own will, naming her sister as trustee for her children, Derrie, who was 19 years old at the time of his petition to terminate the trust, and Michelle, then age 14. Trustee contends on appeal that the trial court erred in (1) denying her motion for restitution in contravention of our decision in *Hollis v. Estate of Hollis,*845 S.W.2d 156 (Mo.App.E.D.1993) *(Hollis I),*that decedent, in her will, intended to create a trust for her children and that trustee was entitled to its funds; and (2) terminating the testamentary trust prior to the date of termination expressed therein where there was no competent and substantial evidence that the *381termination would benefit the remaining minor beneficiary.

The substantive facts appear in *Hollis I, supra.*Trustee argues that we determined in *Hollis I*that decedent intended a single trust for the benefit of both of her children. Our reading of *Hollis I,*however, indicates that the decision did not address the number of trusts, but only that the trial court erred “in finding no trust was created.” *Id.*at 158[6]. Here, the trial court found that two trusts were created, terminated Derrie’s trust and authorized him to retain the funds of which trustee sought restitution.

Our review is governed by the oft-cited principles of *Murphy v. Carron,*536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976). We will sustain the judgment of the trial court unless there is no substantial evidence to support it, it is against the weight of the evidence, or it erroneously declares or applies the law. *Id.*at 32[1],

Trustee’s second point on appeal is relevant only if there was a single trust. We conclude that the trial court’s finding that decedent intended to create separate trusts for each of her children is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record and no error of law appears. Therefore, there were no minor beneficiaries of Derrie’s trust, *see*§ 456.590.2, R.S.Mo. 1986, and it is not necessary to review trustee’s second point.

An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

April 12, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6578

Apex Sourcing & Manufacturing: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_04.15.19.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
., ,.· ..**.r;e;~** 

### 3, 

### Bt2owAJ**~** L:J7 t/3.3d.**~.Lr-57** 

### r**/J1~ ~#IVa?**  Ullllf

### ~/ 

### .5t-B111 LY**d~ f?!l!z;;u~,** **·77:¥~** 

### 1J'IIJ2.**~** 

### 712t!J6'



# tiutllr {}P 6'211111/VM

### Af',t?~**tilid~,~** 

### {J.,tJ,. 

## 6tJX I :fi 

### 308 

### atfJ /17JL ,5fm7bl/)**~77N.~4::5** 

### ii71/**~; ~1212e5~~CE**  1!/P**~R/L. -~0/2LYs-'** 

### ~/f/£6 .c /11/l'o/

### ~d 

### btess A-IVd 

## b£ Wffh 

### YZ'1--f**~---** 

### f{!£; 

### 612-eW /1) /**d2l~** UA-AI!J ':**wt<~82, t!tJt/~ol**  {/2 ._/!,r, lilt' 5 

### cP8 -1 f-**~** ---**~,elt)** .-A

### f2b~T 1

### t!GTzrtPI~**OP~~kh;Lrrtt** 

### !1-fPmt 77) 

### -rhE 17!:YAS

### ~~E**~/2-T:J'**

tY/1) /JflrUI-r :20, 2/Jts, -rhu &=.er 

### A'Ao**~~ "h-~.(a>rt:!?A-4/~,at(S!.** **t;;«:~(!~/lJ** 

### Avd &7?177/JMS //tt&77[)/f/ /'i?R '

.**/~** 

### 71;1/d**t<EU)AJS!damfit)AJ' ~**  . 

## fl)!li**~JUt~** 

### t1, UJ/.5-)

### ~a~AJ ?;!'211/,ao- 

### (Jp**)/;qbn:~:5~R/as** tV/!6**~1/Ed** 

### Avdbt'otJ/ce:J**/v~** UJt2177hV**&~,., &#~A**  //, dtPL5'.

· 

## r:i£ IJ« 1/llWIJ/IrA/d

### ~ lEY

### f?~**£?21~ Lf~AI** **/D~J'-C!/0** -i!::



### ·

### /!J7{)::y;~**.1h~'1 ~7** **~II {CaznF/~** **t!JFA??~/~.,-y)** thllf ILE 

### /JtiW 

### lh'JPart. V7J 

### 7JIE 

### 7l::Y J:J::.S c:5**u~4al'IE** L!'£)4/'ZT,

.·

. ._.·

I.;.

.

•·,· 

# · RECEI\/ED**~~~ t?OO~T**  OF**CflffiAIN~t .llt~PE,A.!_.S**  

### MAY 1120L

Ab61 Aoosts,Cierk

## ~~**;Jlw~·**
Exhibit 10.31



 Exhibit 10.31 

TERMINATION OF DEFERRED SUPPLEMENTAL 

COMPENSATION AGREEMENT WITH 

STEPHEN G. FIELDS

This Termination of Deferred Supplemental Compensation Agreement made this
31st day of March, 2010, between the BANK OF THE
COMMONWEALTH, a Virginia banking corporation, Norfolk, Virginia (hereinafter called the “Bank”) and STEPHEN G. FIELDS (hereinafter called “Employee”). 

WHEREAS, Employee is an employee of the Bank and is a party to a Deferred Supplemental Compensation Agreement (which may have been
amended and/or restated on one or more occasions) between Employee and Bank (hereinafter called “Deferred Compensation Agreement”); and 

WHEREAS, Employee and Bank have mutually agreed to terminate the Deferred Compensation Agreement in recognition of the Bank’s desire
to obtain additional capital, the Employee’s desire to continue employment, and in recognition of the Bank’s desire to terminate the economic liability associated with deferred compensation arrangements involving all employees who are not
in payment status under said agreements. 
 THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which
is hereby acknowledged, (1) the Deferred Compensation Agreement is hereby terminated by mutual consent of the Bank and the Employee; (2) no payment or economic benefit of any kind shall be paid by the Bank to the Employee; (3) any
Bank assets associated with the Deferred Compensation Agreement, including, but not limited to, policies of life insurance, remain the property of the Bank; and (4) the Bank and the Employee hereby release each other of any claims which have
arisen from or may in the future arise from the entry of the Deferred Compensation Agreement and the termination of said Deferred Compensation Agreement, all effective on the date first written above. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Termination of Preferred Supplemental Compensation Agreement on the date first written
above. 
  

									
	BANK OF THE COMMONWEALTH	 		 	EMPLOYEE:
					
	By:	 	/s/    Cynthia A. Sabol	 		 	By:	 	/s/    Stephen G. Fields
	Its:	 	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer	 		 		 	STEPHEN G. FIELDS
Amendment to the Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.01 
  

			
	

	  	AMENDED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 This amendment to the Employment Agreement (the “Employment Agreement”) is entered into
as of this 26th day of October, 2006, between Massoud Safavi (the “Employee”) and EFJ, Inc. (the “Company”). 
 The
Company and Employee agree to amend the Employment Agreement as follows: 
 Section 1, paragraph d is deleted and replaced with the
following: 
 “d. The Company agrees to provide Employee with 100,000 options to purchase Company stock. All rights and obligations
regarding stock options will be governed by the stock option plan documents.” 
 All other terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement remain
unchanged. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Employment Agreement to be executed on its behalf and the Employee has signed
his name hereto, effective as of the date first written above. 
  

			
	COMPANY:
	
	EFJ, Inc.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Michael Gamble

	Printed Name:	 	Michael Gamble
	Its:	 	Vice President, Administration
	
	EMPLOYEE:
	
	 /s/ Massoud Safavi

	Massoud Safavi
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Sheila M. Brumley, SVP and CFO, certify that:

(1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Mountain Bank Holding Company.

(2) Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

(4) The registrants other certifying officer
and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

(5) The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                     |  |  |  |                             
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------
|Date: March 10, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/    SHEILA M.
BRUMLEY    
|                     |  |  |  | Sheila M. Brumley, SVP & CFO