alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 81 (Thursday, April 25, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 18395]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10233]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

Open Meeting, Technical Mapping Advisory Council

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App.1, the Federal Emergency Management Agency 
gives notice of the following meeting:

NAME: Technical Mapping Advisory Council.

DATES OF MEETING: May 2-3, 1996.

PLACE: Hall of States, 444 North Capitol Street, Washington, D.C. 
20001.

TIME: May 2, 1996 from 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. May 3, 1996 from 8:30 
a.m. to Noon.

PROPOSED AGENDA: Selection of the Council chair; general orientation on 
the background, authority and duties of the Council. presentations on 
the impacts of Flood Insurance Rate Maps; discussion of the objectives, 
priorities, timing, and procedures for accomplishing the Council's 
work.

STATUS: Open to the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael K. Buckley, P.E., Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., room 421, Washington, 
DC, 20472; telephone (202) 646-2756.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As the first official meeting of the 
Technical Mapping Advisory Council, the organization of and goals for 
the group will be established. Also, the next meeting date and location 
will be established.

    Dated: April 2, 1996.
Richard W. Krimm,
Acting Associate Director, Mitigation Directorate.
[FR Doc. 96-10233 Filed 4-24-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-04-P
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 82 (Friday, April 26, 1996)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 18539]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10295]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 96-88; RM-8760]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Manitowoc and Two Rivers, WI

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document requests comments on a petition filed by Lyle 
Robert Evans d/b/a High Mark Radio Company, proposing the allotment of 
Channel 255A to Two Rivers, Wisconsin, as that community's first local 
FM service. Channel 255A can be allotted to Two Rivers with a site 
restriction 12.1 kilometers (7.5 miles) southwest of the community. The 
coordinates for Channel 255A are 44-03-57 and 87-39-44. We shall also 
make an editorial correction to the FM Table of Allotments showing the 
actual allotment of Channel 272A at Manitowoc, Wisconsin, rather than 
Two Rivers, Wisconsin.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before June 10, 1996, and reply 
comments on or before June 25, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 20554. In 
addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should 
serve the petitioner, as follows: Lyle Robert Evans d/b/a High Mark 
Radio Company, 1296 Marian Lane, Green Bay, Wisconsin 54304.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Scheuerle, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 96-88, adopted April 3, 
1996, and released April 18, 1996. The full text of this Commission 
decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business 
hours in the Commission's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, 
NW., Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, International 
Transcription Services, Inc., 2100 M Street, NW., Suite 140, 
Washington, DC 20037, (202) 857-3800.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of l980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contact.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 96-10295 Filed 4-25-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-26-1999
<CASH>                                          16,422
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,631
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (217)
<INVENTORY>                                      2,938
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,284
<PP&E>                                         133,688
<DEPRECIATION>                                (10,227)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 157,488
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,869
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   157,488
<SALES>                                        123,227
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               133,254
<CGS>                                           14,526
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   94,080
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,955
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 867
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,995
<INCOME-TAX>                                       775
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,220
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,220
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.09


</TABLE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5010

OMRON Management Center of America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**DONALD JOSEPH DINELLO, JR.,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 37 MAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 4th day of May, 2016, the Petition for Allowa nce of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**

**Justice Wecht did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.**
Exhibit 10.2 - Engagement Letter for George Hampton III.



Exhibit 10.2


BIG CAT ENERGY CORPORATION

TRANSWESTERN ONE, SUITE 215

404 NORTH 31st STREET

BILLINGS, MONTANA 59101

(406) 255-7190


 

Mr. George Hampton 

6600 Wauconda Drive

Larkspur, CO 80118

August 21, 2006


RE:    Engagement Letter

           Director - Big Cat Energy Corporation


Dear George:


The current Board of Directors of Big Cat Energy Corporation, request that you fill a vacancy on the Board of Directors of the Corporation. The Corporation has Directors and Officers liability insurance in place, which provides liability coverage up to $2,000,000.00. If you wish to see a copy of the insurance binder, please let us know. For your tenure on the Board of Directors, the Corporation offers you the following compensation, (1) Salary of $5,000.00 per fiscal quarter, and (2) Stock options on 200,000 shares of the Corporation's stock. At this time the Corporation can not give you the exact terms of the stock options which will be granted to you by the Corporation, but the option terms will include vesting provisions. The Corporation will reimburse Directors for any travel, meals, lodging, and other expenses incurred by the Director for the benefit of the Corporation. At this time the Corporation is anticipating holding monthly Directors' meetings by conference call, and quarterly meetings with all Directors physically present. The Corporation will use its best efforts to accommodate the Directors when scheduling the time and location of Directors' meetings.


If you choose to accept the position as a Director of the Corporation, you must follow and abide by the Corporation's Code of Ethics and Business Conduct. Please, find enclosed a copy of the Code. Big Cat Energy Corporation is a publicly traded corporation listed and traded on the OTC-BB, under the symbol BCTE. As a Director of the Corporation you must abide by all rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including, but not limited to, the regulations and rules regarding insider-trading. In this regard, also enclosed is a Questionnaire for Directors, which eventually must be completed by each Director and submitted to the Corporation's auditor.


 

 





Mr. George Hampton 

August 21, 2006

Engagement Letter-Director

Page 2




We appreciate the opportunity to have you serve on the Board of Directors of Big Cat Energy Corporation and believe this letter accurately summarizes the significant terms of your engagement as a Director. If you have any questions, please let us know. If you agree with the terms of the engagement as described in this letter, please sign the enclosed second original and return it us in the enclosed self-addressed envelope. Finally, if you agree to accept the position as a Director, please include a short biography with the letter of acceptance. Thank You.


	 	
Sincerely,

	 	
Big Cat Energy Corporation

	 
	 	
By: 
	
ROBERT GOODALE

	 	 	
Robert Goodale, Secretary/Treasurer

	 
	 
	 
	 	
Accepted and agreed to:

	 
	 	
GEORGE L. HAMPTON III

	 	
George Hampton

	 	
Date: September 5, 2006






 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Enclosures
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

March 9, 2015

N o. 04

- 14

- 00374

- CR

Luis Arnaldo BAEZ

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appelle e

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR6881

Honorable Philip A. Kazen, Jr., Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant Luis Arnaldo Baez’s brief was originally due on December 1, 2014. Due to

medical reasons, Appellant’s counsel was given several extensions to file the brief. Appellant’s

brief was due to be filed on March 2, 2015. On March 2, 2015, Appellant’s counsel filed his

“ Fo urth and Final, Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief” seeking an

additional fourteen days to file the brief. Due to the extenuating circumstances, Appellant’s

motion is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief is due to be filed no later than M arch 16, 2015. No

further extensions will be granted.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 9th day of March, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Petty, Chafin and Senior Judge Annunziata

KAREN D. WARE

MEMORANDUM OPINION*

v. Record No. 1648-12-3 PER CURIAM

JANUARY 15, 2013

CENTRAL VIRGINIA TRAINING CENTER/

 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION

(Jaleh K. Slominski, on brief), for appellant.

(Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II, Attorney General; Wesley G. Russell, Jr., 

Deputy Attorney General; Peter R. Messitt, Senior Assistant 

Attorney General; Scott John Fitzgerald, Senior Assistant Attorney 

General, on brief), for appellee.

Karen D. Ware (hereinafter “claimant”) appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation 

Commission finding that she failed to meet her burden of proving a prima facie case that she was 

underpaid her workers’ compensation benefits. We have reviewed the record and the 

commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Ware v. DBHS-Central Virginia 

Training Center/Commonwealth of Virginia, VWC File No. VA00000092399 (Aug. 15, 2012). 

We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.

Affirmed.

 * Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.

UNPUBLISHED
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Fredrick L. PERKINS, Appellant.

No. WD 50715.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Jan. 9, 1996.

Emmett D. Queener, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, Asst. Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before FENNER, C.J., P.J., and SPINDEN and SMITH, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from conviction of second degree burglary, § 569.030, RSMo 1994, after jury trial, and sentence of fifteen years imprisonment as a prior and persistent offender.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of BioForce Nanosciences Holdings,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Eric Henderson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.


/s/ Eric Henderson
------------------
Eric Henderson
Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2007


      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
      other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
      signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
      written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
      the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff upon request. The foregoing certifications are accompanying the
      Company's Form 10-QSB solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title
      18, United States Code) and are not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB
      or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


OF HEALTH
BENEFITS DIRECT CORPORATION REQUIRED


BY RULE
13a-14(b) UNDER THE EXCHANGE ACT





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Health Benefits Direct Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Anthony R. Verdi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that, based
on my knowledge:





(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





November
15, 2010





/s/
      ANTHONY R. VERDIAnthony
      R. VerdiChief
      Operating Officer and Chief Financial
Officer
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,  As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of WMG Acquisition Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael D. Fleisher, Chief Financial Officer of WMG Acquisition Corp., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Dated:
May 16, 2005

| |  | By: | /s/MICHAEL D. FLEISHER                     
| |  | --- | -------------------------------------------
| |  |     | Michael D. Fleisher
Chief Financial Officer

---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FORM DECEMBER 31,
1997 FORM 10-KSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       3,235,307
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,979,875
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,488,569
<PP&E>                                       1,661,290
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,687,424
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,905,445
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        39,086
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,634,473
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,687,424
<SALES>                                     14,313,101
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,313,101
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,962,765
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (130,279)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,704
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                469,911
<INCOME-TAX>                                   180,660
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            289,251
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   289,251
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1960

WUBANCHI HAILE INGDASHET,

Petitioner,

versus

U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE;

JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A75-348-775)

Submitted: April 21, 2003 Decided: June 4, 2003

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeffrey Kantor, Arlington, Virginia, for Petitioner. Robert D.

McCallum, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Linda S. Wendtland,

Assistant Director, Shelley R. Goad, Office of Immigration

Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.,

for Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Wabanchi Haile Ingdashet, a native and citizen of Ethiopia,

seeks review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals

(“Board”) dismissing her appeal from the immigration judge’s (“IJ”)

order denying her motion to reopen. We review the denial of a

motion to reopen for abuse of discretion. 8 C.F.R. § 3.2(a) (2002);

INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 (1992); Stewart v. INS, 181

F.3d 587, 595 (4th Cir. 1999). A denial of a motion to reopen must

be reviewed with extreme deference, since immigration statutes do

not contemplate reopening and the applicable regulations disfavor

motions to reopen. M.A. v. INS, 899 F.2d 304, 308 (4th Cir. 1990)

(en banc). We have reviewed the administrative record, the Board’s

order and the IJ’s decision and find no abuse of discretion.

We accordingly deny the petition for review. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal arguments are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED