Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 107 / Monday, June 7, 2021 / Notices 30257 

Republic of China,’’ dated concurrently with this 

notice (Issues and Decisions Memorandum). 

8 Id. 

1See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products 

from Taiwan: Affirmative Preliminary 

Determination of Circumvention Involving 

Malaysia, 85 FR 8815 (February 18, 2020) 

(Preliminary Determination), and accompanying 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

2See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products 

from India, Italy, the People’s Republic of China, 

the Republic of Korea and Taiwan: Amended Final 

Affirmative Antidumping Determination for India 

and Taiwan, and Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 

48390 (July 25, 2016) (Taiwan CORE Order). 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for Anti-Circumvention Inquiry 

involving Taiwan on the Antidumping Duty Order 

on Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from 

Taiwan,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby 

adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

4See Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from the 

People’s Republic of China: Initiation of AntiCircumvention Inquiries on the Antidumping Duty 

and Countervailing Duty Orders, 84 FR 43585 

(August 21, 2019) (Initiation Notice), and 

accompanying Memorandum, ‘‘Certain CorrosionResistant Steel Products from the People’s Republic 

of China: Initiation of Anti-Circumvention Inquiries 

on the Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty 

Orders,’’ dated August 12, 2019. 

The Issues and Decision Memorandum 

is a public document and is on file 

electronically via the Enforcement and 

Compliance Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Services System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov. A list of 

topics discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is included as 

an Appendix to this notice. In addition, 

a complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/ 

frn/index.html. 

Final Results of Review 

Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 

752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, Commerce 

determines that revocation of the AD 

order on potassium permanganate from 

China would likely lead to continuation 

or recurrence of dumping, and that the 

magnitude of margins likely to prevail is 

up to 128.94 percent.8

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a). Timely 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials, or conversion to 

judicial protective orders is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and terms of an APO is a 

violation which is subject to sanction. 

Notifications to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

final results in accordance with sections 

751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act, 

and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(5)(ii). 

Dated: June 1, 2021. 

Christian Marsh, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. History of the Order 

V. Legal Framework 

VI. Discussion of the Issues 

1. Likelihood of Continuation or 

Recurrence of Dumping 

2. Magnitude of the Margin of Dumping 

Likely to Prevail 

VII. Final Results of Sunset Review 

VIII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2021–11852 Filed 6–4–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–583–856] 

Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel 

Products From Taiwan: Affirmative 

Final Determination of Circumvention 

Involving Malaysia 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that imports of 

certain corrosion-resistant steel 

products (CORE), completed in 

Malaysia, using carbon hot-rolled steel 

(HRS) and/or cold-rolled steel (CRS) flat 

products (substrate) manufactured in 

Taiwan, are circumventing the 

antidumping duty (AD) order on CORE 

from Taiwan. 

DATES: Applicable June 7, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joy 

Zhang, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1168. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On February 18, 2020, Commerce 

published the Preliminary 

Determination 1 of circumvention of the 

Taiwan CORE Order.2 A summary of 

events that occurred since Commerce 

published the Preliminary 

Determination, as well as a full 

discussion of the issues raised by parties 

for this final determination, may be 

found in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.3 The Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is on file electronically via Enforcement 

and Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/ 

frn/. 

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by this order 

are certain flat-rolled steel products, 

either clad, plated, or coated with 

corrosion-resistant metals such as zinc, 

aluminum, or zinc-, aluminum-, nickelor iron-based alloys, whether or not 

corrugated or painted, varnished, 

laminated, or coated with plastics or 

other non-metallic substances in 

addition to the metallic coating. For a 

complete description of the scope of the 

order, see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

Scope of the Anti-Circumvention 

Inquiry 

This anti-circumvention inquiry 

covers CORE completed in Malaysia 

from HRS and/or CRS substrate input 

manufactured in Taiwan and 

subsequently exported to the United 

States (merchandise subject to this 

inquiry). This final ruling applies to all 

shipments of merchandise subject to 

this inquiry entered on or after the date 

of the initiation of this inquiry.4

Importers and exporters of CORE 

produced in Malaysia using: (1) HRS 

manufactured in Malaysia or other third 

countries, (2) CRS manufactured in 

Malaysia using HRS produced in 

Malaysia or other third countries, or (3) 

CRS manufactured in other third 

countries, must certify that the HRS 

and/or CRS processed into CORE in 

Malaysia did not originate in Taiwan, as 

provided for in the certifications 

attached to this Federal Register notice. 

Otherwise, their merchandise will be 

subject to AD requirements. 

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this anticircumvention inquiry in accordance 

with section 781(b) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act). Because 

certain interested parties did not 

cooperate to the best of their abilities in 

responding to Commerce’s requests for 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
30258 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 107 / Monday, June 7, 2021 / Notices 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum for the Anti-Circumvention Inquiries 

of the Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty 

Orders on Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel 

Products from Taiwan,’’ dated February 7, 2020. 

6We made certain adjustments to our calculations 

with respect to certain prongs of the analysis for 

CSC Steel Sdn. Bhd. (CSCM), a cooperative 

mandatory respondent in this inquiry, based on 

revisions provided in a post-preliminary response 

from the respondent. See Memorandum, ‘‘AntiCircumvention Inquiry of the Antidumping Duty 

Order of Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products 

from Taiwan: China Steel Sdn. Bhd.—Final 

Analysis Memorandum,’’ dated concurrently with 

this memorandum (CSCM Final Analysis 

Memorandum). However, we note that as the 

updated information does not result in material 

changes to the calculations from the Preliminary 

Determination, the conclusions of the analysis from 

the Preliminary Determination remain unchanged. 

See Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

7See unpublished Federal Register notice, 

‘‘Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from 

the People’s Republic of China: Affirmative Final 

Determination of Circumvention Involving 

Malaysia,’’ dated concurrently with this notice. 

8See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Flat 

Products from India, Italy, the People’s Republic of 

China, the Republic of Korea, and Taiwan: 

Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping Duty 

Determination for India and Taiwan, and 

Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 48390 (July 25, 

2016); see also Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel 

Products from India, Italy, Republic of Korea, and 

the People’s Republic of China: Countervailing Duty 

Order, 81 FR 48387 (July 25, 2016) (collectively, 

China CORE Orders). 

9See Preliminary Determination, 85 FR at 8816, 

and accompanying Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum at 8 and 22–23. 

information, we continue to base parts 

of our final determination on the facts 

available, with adverse inferences, 

pursuant to sections 776(a) and (b) of 

the Act. The Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum contains a full 

description of the methodology.5 We 

incorporate by reference this description 

of the methodology for our final 

determination. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs by parties in this inquiry 

are addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. A list of the issues raised 

is attached to this notice as Appendix I. 

Based on our analysis of the 

comments received from interested 

parties, we made no revisions to the 

Preliminary Determination with regard 

to our analysis under the anticircumvention factors of section 781(b) 

of the Act.6 We have made certain 

changes to the language in the 

certifications to provide guidance on 

who should complete the exporter 

certification, and to allow importers and 

exporters to clearly identify the parties 

involved in the sale(s) involving the 

export to the United States. 

Final Affirmative Determination of 

Circumvention 

We determine that exports to the 

United States of CORE completed in 

Malaysia from HRS and/or CRS 

substrate manufactured in Taiwan are 

circumventing the Taiwan CORE Order. 

We therefore find it appropriate to 

determine that merchandise subject to 

this inquiry should be considered to be 

within the scope of the Taiwan CORE 

Order, and to instruct U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) to continue to 

suspend liquidation of any entries of 

CORE completed in Malaysia using HRS 

and/or CRS substrate manufactured in 

Taiwan. 

Continuation of Suspension of 

Liquidation 

As stated above, Commerce has made 

an affirmative determination of 

circumvention of the Taiwan CORE 

Order by exports to the United States of 

CORE completed in Malaysia using 

Taiwanese-origin HRS and/or CRS 

substrate. In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.225(1)(3), Commerce will direct 

CBP to continue to suspend liquidation 

and to require a cash deposit of 

estimated duties on unliquidated entries 

of CORE completed in Malaysia using 

Taiwanese-origin HRS and/or CRS 

substrate that were entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after August 12, 

2019, the date of initiation of this anticircumvention inquiry. The suspension 

of liquidation and cash deposit 

instructions will remain in effect until 

further notice. 

CORE produced in Malaysia from 

HRS or CRS substrate that is not of 

Taiwanese-origin is not subject to this 

inquiry. However, imports of such 

merchandise are subject to certification 

requirements, and cash deposits may be 

required if the certification 

requirements are not satisfied. 

Additionally, CORE completed in 

Malaysia from HRS and/or CRS from 

China also has been found to be 

circumventing the AD/CVD orders on 

CORE from China and such 

merchandise is subject to similar 

certification requirements.7

Accordingly, if an importer imports 

CORE from Malaysia and claims that the 

CORE was not produced from HRS and/ 

or CRS substrate manufactured in 

Taiwan, in order not to be subject to AD 

and/or CVD requirements, the importer 

and exporter are required to meet the 

certification and documentation 

requirements described in Appendices 

II, III and IV, in order for cash deposits 

pursuant to the Taiwan CORE Order not 

to be required. The party that made the 

sale to the United States should fill out 

the exporter certification. 

In the situation where no certification 

is provided for an entry, and AD/CVD 

orders on CORE from China or the AD 

order on CORE from Taiwan potentially 

apply to that entry, Commerce intends 

to instruct CBP to suspend liquidation 

of the entry and collect cash deposits at 

the rates applicable to the China CORE 

Orders (i.e., the AD rate established for 

the China-wide entity (199.43 percent) 

and the CVD rate established for allother Chinese producers/exporters 

(39.05 percent)).8 This is to prevent 

evasion, given that the rates applicable 

to the AD/CVD orders on CORE from 

China are higher than the all-others rate 

established by the AD order on CORE 

from Taiwan. In the situation where a 

certification is provided for the AD/CVD 

orders on CORE from China (stating that 

the merchandise was not produced from 

HRS and/or CRS from China), but no 

other certification is provided, then 

Commerce intends to instruct CBP to 

suspend the entry and collect cash 

deposits at the AD all-others rate 

applicable under the AD order on CORE 

from Taiwan (i.e., 3.66 percent). 

Further, for this final determination, 

we continue to determine that the 

following non-responsive companies are 

not eligible for the certification process: 

Hsin Kuang Steel Co Ltd; FIW Steel Sdn 

Bhd; NS BlueScope Malaysia Sdn Bhd; 

and YKGI/Yung Kong Galv. Ind/ 

Starshine Holdings Sdn Bhd/ASTEEL 

Sdn Bhd (collectively, non-responsive 

companies).9 Accordingly, importers of 

CORE from Malaysia produced and/or 

exported by these ineligible companies 

are similarly ineligible for the 

certification process with regard to their 

imports of CORE produced by or 

sourced from these companies. 

Additionally, exporters are not eligible 

to certify shipments of merchandise 

produced by the above-listed 

companies. Accordingly, CBP shall 

suspend the entry and collect cash 

deposits for entries of merchandise 

produced and/or exported by nonresponsive companies at the AD rate 

established for the China-wide entity 

(199.43 percent) and the CVD rate 

established for all other Chinese 

producers and/or exporters (39.05 

percent) pursuant to the China CORE 

Orders. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order 

This notice will serve as the only 

reminder to all parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 107 / Monday, June 7, 2021 / Notices 30259 

10See China CORE Orders. 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of return/ 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and the terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This determination is issued and 

published in accordance with section 

781(b) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.225(f). 

Dated: June 1, 2021. 

Christian Marsh, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix I—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Scope of the Anti-Circumvention Inquiry 

V. Verification 

VI. Use of Facts Available With an Adverse 

Inference 

VII. Changes Since the Preliminary 

Determination 

VIII. Statutory Framework 

IX. Statutory Analysis 

X. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment: Whether CSCM’s Manufacturing 

Operations in Malaysia Constitute 

Circumvention Under the Statutory 

Criteria Established in Section 781(b)(2) 

of the Act 

XI. Recommendation 

Appendix II—Certification 

Requirements 

If an importer imports certain corrosionresistant steel products (CORE) from 

Malaysia and claims that the CORE was not 

produced from hot-rolled steel and/or coldrolled steel substrate (substrate) 

manufactured in Taiwan, the importer is 

required to complete and maintain the 

importer certification attached hereto as 

Appendix III and all supporting 

documentation. Where the importer uses a 

broker to facilitate the entry process, it 

should obtain the entry summary number 

from the broker. Agents of the importer, such 

as brokers, however, are not permitted to 

make this certification on behalf of the 

importer. 

The exporter of such merchandise is 

required to complete and maintain the 

exporter certification, attached as Appendix 

IV, and is further required to provide the 

importer a copy of that certification and all 

supporting documentation. The party that 

made the sale to the United States should fill 

out the exporter certification. 

For any such certifications completed on 

the date of publication of this final 

determination through 20 days after the date 

of publication, exporters and importers 

should use the certifications attached to the 

Preliminary Determination. For any such 

certifications completed on or after 21 days 

after the date of publication of this final 

determination, exporters and importers 

should use the certifications contained below 

that have changed from the certifications 

issued with the Preliminary Determination. 

For entries on or after the date of 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register, for which certifications are 

required, importers should complete the 

required certification at or prior to the date 

of entry summary, and exporters should 

complete the required certification and 

provide it to the importer at or prior to the 

date of shipment. For all such entries made 

within the first 20 days after publication of 

this notice, exporters and importers should 

use the certifications attached to the 

Preliminary Determination. For all entries 

made on or after 21 days after publication of 

this notice, exporters and importers should 

use the certifications contained below that 

have changed from the certifications issued 

with the Preliminary Determination. 

The importer and exporter are also 

required to maintain sufficient 

documentation supporting their 

certifications. The importer will not be 

required to submit the certifications or 

supporting documentation to U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection (CBP) as part of the 

entry process at this time. However, the 

importer and the exporter will be required to 

present the certifications and supporting 

documentation to Commerce and/or CBP, as 

applicable, upon request by the respective 

agency. Additionally, the claims made in the 

certifications and any supporting 

documentation are subject to verification by 

Commerce and/or CBP. The importer and 

exporter are required to maintain the 

certifications and supporting documentation 

for the later of: (1) A period of five years from 

the date of entry or (2) a period of three years 

after the conclusion of any litigation in 

United States courts regarding such entries. 

In the situation where no certification is 

provided for an entry, and AD/CVD orders on 

CORE from China or the AD order on CORE 

from Taiwan potentially apply to that entry, 

Commerce intends to instruct CBP to 

suspend the entry and collect cash deposits 

at the rate under the China CORE Orders (i.e., 

the AD rate established for the China-wide 

entity (199.43 percent) and the CVD rate 

established for all-other Chinese producers/ 

exporters (39.05 percent)).10 In the situation 

where a certification is provided for the AD/ 

CVD orders on CORE from China (stating that 

the merchandise was not produced from HRS 

and/or CRS from China), but no other 

certification is provided, then Commerce 

intends to instruct CBP to suspend the entry 

and collect cash deposits at the AD all-others 

rate applicable to the AD order on CORE 

from Taiwan (i.e., 3.66 percent). 

Appendix III—Importer Certification 

I hereby certify that: 

(A) My name is {IMPORTING COMPANY 

OFFICIAL’S NAME} and I am an official of 

{NAME OF IMPORTING COMPANY}, 

located at {ADRESS OF IMPORTING 

COMPANY}. 

(B) I have direct personal knowledge of the 

facts regarding the importation into the 

Customs territory of the United States of the 

corrosion resistant steel products produced 

in Malaysia that entered under entry 

number(s), identified below, and which are 

covered by this certification. ‘‘Direct personal 

knowledge’’ refers to facts the certifying party 

is expected to have in its own records. For 

example, the importer should have direct 

personal knowledge of the importation of the 

product (e.g., the name of the exporter) in its 

records. 

(C) If the importer is acting on behalf of the 

first U.S. customer, complete this paragraph, 

if not put ‘‘NA’’ at the end of this paragraph: 

The corrosion resistant steel products 

covered by this certification were imported 

by {NAME OF IMPORTING COMPANY} on 

behalf of {NAME OF U.S. CUSTOMER}, 

located at {ADDRESS OF U.S. CUSTOMER}. 

(D) The corrosion resistant steel products 

covered by this certification were shipped to 

{NAME OF PARTY TO WHOM 

MERCHANDISE WAS FIRST SHIPPED IN 

THE UNITED STATES}, located at 

{ADDRESS OF SHIPMENT}. 

(E) I have personal knowledge of the facts 

regarding the production of the corrosion 

resistant steel products identified below. 

‘‘Personal knowledge’’ includes facts 

obtained from another party (e.g., 

correspondence received by the importer (or 

exporter) from the producer regarding the 

country of manufacture of the imported 

products). 

(F) The corrosion resistant steel products 

covered by this certification were not 

manufactured using hot-rolled steel and/or 

cold-rolled steel substrate produced in 

Taiwan. 

(G) This certification applies to the 

following entries (repeat this block as many 

times as necessary): 

Entry Summary #: 

Entry Summary Line Item #: 

Foreign Seller: 

Foreign Seller’s address: 

Foreign Seller’s Invoice #: 

Foreign Seller’s Invoice Line Item #: 

Producer: 

Producer’s Address: 

(H) I understand that {NAME OF 

IMPORTING COMPANY} is required to 

maintain a copy of this certification and 

sufficient documentation supporting this 

certification (i.e., documents maintained in 

the normal course of business, or documents 

obtained by the certifying party, for example, 

mill certificates, production records, 

invoices, etc.) for the later of: (1) A period of 

five years from the date of entry or (2) a 

period of three years after the conclusion of 

any litigation in the United States courts 

regarding such entries. 

(I) I understand that {NAME OF 

IMPORTING COMPANY} is required to 

provide this certification and supporting 

records, upon request, to U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) and/or the 

Department of Commerce (Commerce). 

(J) I understand that {NAME OF 

IMPORTING COMPANY} is required to 

maintain a copy of the exporter’s certification 

(attesting to the production and/or export of 

the imported merchandise identified above), 

and any supporting records provided by the 

exporter to the importer, for the later of: (1) 

A period of five years from the date of entry 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
30260 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 107 / Monday, June 7, 2021 / Notices 

1See Certain Uncoated Paper from Indonesia and 

the People’s Republic of China: Amended Final 

Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and 

Countervailing Duty Order (Indonesia) and 

Countervailing Duty Order (People’s Republic of 

China), 81 FR 11187 (Order). 

2See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews, 

86 FR 7709 (February 1, 2021). 

or (2) a period of three years after the 

conclusion of any litigation in United States 

courts regarding such entries. 

(K) I understand that {NAME OF 

IMPORTING COMPANY} is required, upon 

request, to provide a copy of the exporter’s 

certification and any supporting records 

provided by the exporter to the importer, to 

CBP and/or Commerce. 

(L) I understand that the claims made 

herein, and the substantiating 

documentation, are subject to verification by 

CBP and/or Commerce. 

(M) I understand that failure to maintain 

the required certifications, and/or failure to 

substantiate the claims made herein, and/or 

failure to allow CBP and/or Commerce to 

verify the claims made herein, may result in 

a de facto determination that all entries to 

which this certification applies are within 

the scope of the antidumping/countervailing 

duty order on corrosion resistant steel 

products from Taiwan. I understand that 

such finding will result in: 

(i) Suspension of liquidation of all 

unliquidated entries (and entries for which 

liquidation has not become final) for which 

these requirements were not met; 

(ii) the requirement that the importer post 

applicable antidumping duty and/or 

countervailing duty cash deposits (as 

appropriate) equal to the rates determined by 

Commerce; and 

(iii) the revocation of {NAME OF 

IMPORTING COMPANY}’s privilege to 

certify future imports of corrosion resistant 

steel products from Malaysia as not 

manufactured using hot-rolled steel and/or 

cold-rolled steel substrate from Taiwan. 

(N) I understand that agents of the 

importer, such as brokers, are not permitted 

to make this certification. 

(O) This certification was completed at or 

prior to the date of entry summary. 

(P) I am aware that U.S. law (including, but 

not limited to, 18 U.S.C. 1001) imposes 

criminal sanctions on individuals who 

knowingly and willfully make material false 

statements to the U.S. government. 

Signature 

NAME OF COMPANY OFFICIAL 

TITLE 

DATE 

Appendix IV—Exporter Certification 

SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: The party that 

made the sale to the United States should fill 

out the exporter certification. 

I hereby certify that: 

(A) My name is {COMPANY OFFICIAL’S 

NAME} and I am an official of {NAME OF 

COMPANY}, located at {ADDRESS}; 

(B) I have direct personal knowledge of the 

facts regarding the production and 

exportation of the corrosion resistant steel 

products identified below. ‘‘Direct personal 

knowledge’’ refers to facts the certifying party 

is expected to have in its own books and 

records. For example, an exporter should 

have direct personal knowledge of the 

producer’s identity and location. 

(C) The corrosion resistant steel products 

produced in Malaysia and covered by this 

certification were not manufactured using 

hot-rolled steel and/or cold-rolled steel 

substrate produced in Taiwan. 

(D) This certification applies to the 

following sales to {NAME OF U.S. 

CUSTOMER}, located at {ADDRESS OF U.S. 

CUSTOMER}. (repeat this block as many 

times as necessary): 

Foreign Seller’s Invoice # to U.S. Customer: 

Foreign Seller’s Invoice to U.S. Customer 

Line item #: 

Producer Name: 

Producer’s Address: 

Producer’s Invoice # to Foreign Seller: (If the 

foreign seller and the producer are the 

same party, put NA here.) 

(E) The corrosion resistant steel products 

covered by this certification were shipped to 

{NAME OF U.S. PARTY TO WHOM 

MERCHANDISE WAS SHIPPED}, located at 

{U.S. ADDRESS TO WHICH MERCHANDISE 

WAS SHIPPED}. 

(F) I understand that {NAME OF 

EXPORTING COMPANY} is required to 

maintain a copy of this certification and 

sufficient documentation supporting this 

certification (i.e., documents maintained in 

the normal course of business, or documents 

obtained by the certifying party, for example, 

mill certificates, production records, 

invoices, etc.) for the later of: (1) A period of 

five years from the date of entry or (2) a 

period of three years after the conclusion of 

any litigation in the United States courts 

regarding such entries. 

(G) I understand that {NAME OF 

EXPORTING COMPANY} must provide a 

copy of this Exporter Certification to the U.S. 

importer by the date of shipment; 

(H) I understand that {NAME OF 

EXPORTING COMPANY} is required to 

provide a copy of this certification and 

supporting records, upon request, to U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and/or 

the Department of Commerce (Commerce). 

(I) I understand that the claims made 

herein, and the substantiating 

documentation, are subject to verification by 

CBP and/or Commerce. 

(J) I understand that failure to maintain the 

required certification, and/or failure to 

substantiate the claims made herein, and/or 

failure to allow CBP and/or Commerce to 

verify the claims made herein, may result in 

a de facto determination that all sales to 

which this certification applies are within 

the scope of the antidumping/countervailing 

duty order on corrosion resistant steel 

products from Taiwan. I understand that 

such finding will result in: 

(i) Suspension of all unliquidated entries 

(and entries for which liquidation has not 

become final) for which these requirements 

were not met; and 

(ii) the requirement that the importer post 

applicable antidumping duty and/or 

countervailing duty cash deposits (as 

appropriate) equal to the rates as determined 

by Commerce; and 

(iii) the revocation of {NAME OF 

EXPORTING COMPANY}’s privilege to 

certify future exports of corrosion resistant 

steel products from Malaysia as not 

manufactured using hot-rolled steel and/or 

cold-rolled steel substrate from Taiwan. 

(K) This certification was completed at or 

prior to the date of shipment. 

(L) I am aware that U.S. law (including, but 

not limited to, 18 U.S.C. 1001) imposes 

criminal sanctions on individuals who 

knowingly and willfully make material false 

statements to the U.S. government. 

Signature 

NAME OF COMPANY OFFICIAL 

TITLE 

DATE 

[FR Doc. 2021–11850 Filed 6–4–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–570–023] 

Certain Uncoated Paper From the 

People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of the Expedited Five-Year 

Sunset Review of the Countervailing 

Duty Order 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: As a result of this sunset 

review, the Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) finds that revoking the 

countervailing duty (CVD) order on 

certain uncoated paper (uncoated paper) 

from the People’s Republic of China 

(China) would likely lead to 

continuation or recurrence of 

countervailable subsidies at the levels 

indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of 

Review’’ section of this notice. 

DATES: Applicable June 7, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Peter Zukowski, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0189. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On March 3, 2016, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register the 

CVD Order on uncoated paper from 

China.1 On February 1, 2021, Commerce 

published the notice of initiation of the 

first sunset review of the Order, 

pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).2 On 

February 12, 2021, Commerce received 

a notice of intent to participate from 

Domtar Corporation (Domtar), Finch 

Paper LLC (Finch Paper), and North 

Pacific Paper Company (NORPAC), 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES