Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 105 / Thursday, June 3, 2021 / Notices 29805 

potential economic benefit to the Moapa 

Band. 

The BIA and BLM will use the EIS to 

make decisions on the land lease and 

right-of-way applications under their 

respective jurisdiction; the EPA may use 

the document to make decisions under 

its authorities; the Band may use the 

FEIS to make decisions under its 

Environmental Policy Ordinance; and 

the USFWS may use the FEIS to support 

its decision under the Endangered 

Species Act. 

Directions for Submitting Comments: 

Please include your name, return 

address and the caption: ‘‘FEIS 

Comments, Proposed Southern Bighorn 

Solar Projects’’ on the first page of your 

written comments. 

Locations Where the FEIS is Available 

for Review: The FEIS will be available 

for review at: BIA Western Regional 

Office, 2600 North Central Avenue, 12th 

Floor, Suite 210, Phoenix, Arizona; BIA 

Southern Paiute Agency, 180 North 200 

East, Suite 111, St. George, Utah; and 

the BLM Southern Nevada District 

Office, 4701 North Torrey Pines Drive, 

Las Vegas, Nevada. The FEIS is also 

available on line at: 

www.southernbighornsolar.com. 

To obtain an electronic copy of the 

FEIS, please provide your name and 

address in writing or by voicemail to 

Mr. Chip Lewis or Mr. Garry Cantley. 

Their contact information is listed in the 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT

section of this notice. Individual paper 

copies of the FEIS will be provided only 

upon request. 

Public Comment Availability: Written 

comments, including names and 

addresses of respondents, will be 

available for public review at the BIA 

Western Regional Office, at the mailing 

address shown in the ADDRESSES section 

during regular business hours, 8 a.m. to 

4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except holidays. Before including your 

address, telephone number, email 

address, or other personal identifying 

information in your comment, you 

should be aware that your entire 

comment—including your personal 

identifying information—may be made 

publicly available at any time. While 

you can ask us in your comment to 

withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. 

Authority: This notice is published in 

accordance with section 1503.1 of the 

Council on Environmental Quality 

regulations (40 CFR 1500 et seq.) and 

the Department of the Interior 

Regulations (43 CFR part 46) 

implementing the procedural 

requirements of the National 

Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 

4321 et seq.), and in accordance with 

the exercise of authority delegated to the 

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary— 

Indian Affairs by part 209 of the 

Department Manual. 

Bryan Newland, 

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary—Indian 

Affairs. 

[FR Doc. 2021–11647 Filed 6–2–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4337–15–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1250] 

Certain Cellular Signal Boosters, 

Repeaters, Bi-Directional Amplifiers, 

and Components Thereof (II); 

Commission Determination Not To 

Review an Initial Determination 

Terminating the Investigation Based 

on Settlement; Termination of the 

Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission (‘‘Commission’’) has 

determined not to review an initial 

determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 8) of 

the presiding administrative law judge 

(‘‘ALJ’’) granting a joint motion to 

terminate the investigation in its 

entirety based on settlement. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Robert Needham, Office of the General 

Counsel, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

708–5468. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. 

Hearing-impaired persons are advised 

that information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 

205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on February 25, 2021, based on a 

complaint filed by Wilson Electronics 

LLC of St. George, Utah (‘‘Wilson’’). 86 

FR 11555–56 (February 25, 2021). The 

complaint, as supplemented, alleged 

violations of section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 

1337, in the importation into the United 

States, the sale for importation, and the 

sale within the United States after 

importation of certain cellular signal 

boosters, repeaters, bi-directional 

amplifiers, and components thereof by 

reason of infringement of certain claims 

of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,221,967; 7,409,186; 

7,486,929; 7,729,669; 7,783,318; 

8,583,033; 8,583,034 (‘‘the ’034 patent); 

8,639,180 (‘‘the ’180 patent); 8,755,399; 

8,849,187; 8,874,029 (‘‘the ’029 patent); 

and 8,874,030 (‘‘the ’030 patent). Id. The 

Commission’s notice of investigation 

named as respondents Cellphone-Mate, 

Inc. d/b/a SureCall of Fremont, 

California, and Shenzhen SureCall 

Communication Technology Co., Ltd. of 

Shenzhen, China (together, ‘‘SureCall’’). 

Id. at 11556. The Commission 

determined to sever the investigation 

into three separate investigations based 

on the complaint to further efficient 

adjudication. The present investigation 

was instituted to determine whether 

there is a violation of Section 337 with 

respect to claims 1–20 of the ’034; 

claims 10–14, and 16–17 of the ’180 

patent; claims 1–10 and 13–15 of the 

’029 patent; and claims 1–24 of the ’030 

patent. The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations is not participating in this 

investigation. Id. 

On May 12, 2021, Wilson and 

SureCall jointly moved to terminate the 

investigation based on settlement. No 

responses to the motion were received. 

On May 13, 2021, the ALJ issued the 

subject ID, granting the motion and 

terminating the investigation based on 

settlement. The ID finds that the motion 

complies with Commission Rule 

210.21(b) and that ‘‘there is no evidence 

showing that terminating this 

investigation on the basis of settlement 

would adversely affect the public health 

and welfare, competitive conditions in 

the U.S. economy, the production of like 

or directly competitive articles in the 

United States, or U.S. consumers.’’ 

Order No. 8, at 2–3. No petitions for 

review of the ID were filed. 

The Commission has determined not 

to review the subject ID. The 

investigation is hereby terminated in its 

entirety. 

The Commission vote for this 

determination took place on May 27, 

2021. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part 

210 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 

210). 

By order of the Commission. 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
29806 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 105 / Thursday, June 3, 2021 / Notices 

1The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 

CFR 207.2(f)). 

Issued: May 27, 2021. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2021–11619 Filed 6–2–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–521 and 731– 

TA–1252–1255 and 1257 (Review)] 

Steel Nails From Korea, Malaysia, 

Oman, Taiwan, and Vietnam 

Determinations 

On the basis of the record 1 developed 

in the subject five-year reviews, the 

United States International Trade 

Commission (‘‘Commission’’) 

determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 

1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the 

countervailing duty order on steel nails 

from Vietnam and the antidumping duty 

orders on steel nails from Korea, 

Malaysia, Oman, Taiwan, and Vietnam 

would be likely to lead to continuation 

or recurrence of material injury to an 

industry in the United States within a 

reasonably foreseeable time. 

Background 

The Commission instituted these 

reviews on June 1, 2020 (85 FR 33195) 

and determined on September 4, 2020 

that it would conduct expedited reviews 

(86 FR 26545, May 14, 2021). 

The Commission made these 

determinations pursuant to section 

751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It 

completed and filed its determinations 

in these reviews on May 28, 2021. The 

views of the Commission are contained 

in USITC Publication 5200 (May 2021), 

entitled Steel Nails from Korea, 

Malaysia, Oman, Taiwan, and Vietnam: 

Investigation Nos. 701–TA–521 and 

731–TA–1252–1255 and 1257 (Review). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: May 28, 2021. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2021–11703 Filed 6–2–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1260] 

Certain Toner Supply Containers and 

Components Thereof (II); Commission 

Determination Not To Review an Initial 

Determination Granting Complainants’ 

Unopposed Motion To Amend the 

Complaint and Notice of Investigation 

AGENCY: International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) 

(Order No. 6) of the presiding 

administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) 

granting complainants’ unopposed 

motion to amend the complaint and 

notice of investigation in the abovecaptioned investigation to correct the 

identification of a respondent. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Richard P. Hadorn, Esq., Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

205–3179. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. 

Hearing-impaired persons are advised 

that information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal, telephone 

(202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 

13, 2021, the Commission instituted this 

investigation based on a complaint filed 

by Canon Inc. of Tokyo, Japan; Canon 

U.S.A., Inc. of Melville, New York; and 

Canon Virginia, Inc. of Newport News, 

Virginia (collectively, ‘‘Canon’’). 86 FR 

19287–88 (Apr. 13, 2021). The 

complaint, as supplemented, alleges 

violations of section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 

1337), based on the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

and the sale within the United States 

after importation of certain toner supply 

containers and components thereof by 

reason of infringement of certain claims 

of thirteen patents: U.S. Patent Nos. 

10,209,667; 10,289,060; 10,289,061; 

10,295,957; 10,488,814; 10,496,032; 

10,496,033; 10,514,654; 10,520,881; 

10,520,882; 8,565,649 (‘‘the ’649 

patent’’); 9,354,551 (‘‘the ’551 patent’’); 

and 9,753,402 (‘‘the ’402 patent’’). Id. at 

19287. The complaint further alleges 

that a domestic industry exists. Id. The 

Commission instituted two separate 

investigations and defined the scope of 

the present investigation as whether 

there is a violation of section 337 based 

on the allegations of infringement as to 

the asserted claims of the ’649, ’551, and 

’402 patents as to the accused products 

identified in the notice of investigation. 

Id. The notice of investigation named 

eleven respondents: Sichuan XingDian 

Technology Co., Ltd. of Sichuan, China; 

Sichuan Wiztoner Technology Co., Ltd. 

of Sichuan, China; 

Anhuiyatengshangmaoyouxiangongsi of 

Ganyuqu, China; ChengDuXiangChang

NanShiYouSheBeiYouXianGongSi of 

SiChuanSheng, China; Digital Marketing 

Corporation d/b/a Digital Buyer 

Marketing Company of Los Angeles, 

California; Do It Wiser, LLC d/b/a Image 

Toner (‘‘Do It Wiser’’) of Wilmington, 

Delaware; 

Hefeierlandianzishangwuyouxiangongsi 

of Chengdushi, China; Shenzhenshi 

Keluodeng Kejiyouxiangognsi of 

Guangdong, China; MITOCOLOR INC. 

of Rowland Heights, California; Xianshi 

yanliangqu canqiubaihuodianshanghang 

of Shanxisheng, China; and Zhuhai 

Henyun Image Co., Ltd. of Zhuhai, 

China. Id. The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations is also named as a party. 

Id. at 19287–88. The question of 

whether there is a violation of section 

337 based on the allegations of 

infringement as to the asserted claims of 

the remaining patents is the subject of 

the severed investigation based on the 

same complaint, Inv. No. 337–TA–1259. 

See 86 FR 19284–86 (Apr. 13, 2021). 

On April 27, 2021, Canon filed a 

motion to amend the complaint and 

notice of investigation to change the 

identification of respondent Do It Wiser 

from ‘‘Do It Wiser, LLC d/b/a Image 

Toner’’ to ‘‘Do It Wiser, Inc. d/b/a Image 

Toner’’ and to make related changes in 

paragraph 31 of the complaint. The 

motion states that (i) OUII does not 

oppose the motion and (ii) Do It Wiser’s 

counsel in a parallel district court 

lawsuit informed Canon that Do It Wiser 

‘‘will not be participating in this 

investigation and does not oppose this 

motion.’’ Mot. at 1. No responses to the 

motion were filed. 

On May 17, 2021, the ALJ issued the 

subject ID granting the motion. The ID 

finds that, in accordance with 

Commission Rule 210.14(b) (19 CFR 

210.14(b)), ‘‘Canon has shown good 

cause to amend the complaint and 

notice of investigation to correct the 

identification of the respondent 

identified in the original complaint as 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES