alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION, Complainant, v. Stanley BROWN, Respondent.

No. 95-SC-593-KB.

Supreme Court of Kentucky.

Sept. 27, 1995.

*ORDER OF DISBARMENT*

STEPHENS, Chief Justice.

The Kentucky Bar Association has brought a disciplinary action against Respondent, Stanley Brown, of Fort Thomas, Campbell County, Kentucky. Respondent was charged by the Inquiry Tribunal with a violation of SCR 3.130-8.3(b) and (c) which provides: “It is professional misconduct for a lawyer to: ... (b) Commit a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects; (c) Engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation....”

Count I of the charge alleges that Respondent became intimate with a client under the age of eighteen, provided her with unlawful drugs, and had sex with her. In its findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendation, the Board of Governors found Respondent guilty under Count I and recommended that he be disbarred. Respondent filed no answer pursuant to SCR 3.190 and has not sought review. SCR 3.370(7).

Therefore, upon consideration of the record and recommendation of the Board of Governors, this Court does hereby order that the Respondent, Stanley Brown, be, and he is hereby disbarred. Brown shall surrender his license to practice law in the Commonwealth of Kentucky. It is further ordered that:

1.Brown shall not be permitted to engage in the practice of law in the Commonwealth of Kentucky as defined by SCR 3.020 until such time as the Supreme Court of Kentucky enters an order reinstating his membership in the Kentucky Bar Association.

2. Brown shall not file an application for reinstatement for a period of five (5) years next succeeding the date of this order.

3. Any application for reinstatement shall be governed by SCR 3.520, the rule providing for reinstatement in case of disbarment or any subsequent amendment or successor to that rule in effect at the time of the application for reinstatement.

4. Any disciplinary proceedings now pending against Brown shall be terminated and the cost thereof shall be paid by him in accordance with SCR 3.450(1). The Kentucky Bar Association has certified that there are costs in the amount of $38.17 and $21.16 with the proceeding to date.

5. Pursuant to SCR 3.390, Brown is hereby ordered to provide notice to any clients he is currently representing of his inability to provide further legal services, to notify all courts in which he has matters pending of this disbarment, and to provide the Director of the Kentucky Bar Association with a copy of all such notice letters, or with a certification that he has no active clients, whichever is applicable.

All concur.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5954

Scosche Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXHIBIT 31.2

                      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Richard A. Kielty, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Brooklyn Federal
     Bancorp, Inc.

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of circumstances under which such statements were
     made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material respect
     the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
     registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
         disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
         supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
         registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
         us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
         which this report is being prepared;

     b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
         procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
         of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
         most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
         reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
     of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
         operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
         reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
         employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting.

Date:  May 15, 2006

/S/ RICHARD A. KIELTY
Richard A. Kielty
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-5437

Radio Systems Corp: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5631

SGRE, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Mountain Bank Holding Company (the Company)
on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Roy T. Brooks, Chief Executive Officer and Sheila M. Brumley, Chief Financial
Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the
operations of the Company.



|                                       |  |  |  |                                           
|-------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------
|/s/    ROY T.
BROOKS                   |  |  |  | /s/    SHEILA M.
BRUMLEY                  
|Roy T. Brooks, Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Sheila M. Brumley, Chief Financial Officer

Date: March 10, 2006
Exhibit
32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002







In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FSP Galleria North Corp.
(the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2008as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), the undersigned, Barbara J. Fournier, Chief Operating Officer
and principal financial officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to her knowledge:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.











Date:  May
      9, 2008
            /s/ Barbara J.
      Fournier
              Barbara
      J. Fournier
              Chief Operating
      Officer
              (Principal Financial
      Officer)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A [Amendment No. 1] of Accentia
Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) for the three months ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q/A), I, Francis E. ODonnell, Jr.,
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Form 10-Q/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended: and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 15, 2006



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Francis E. ODonnell, Jr.                    
|Francis E. ODonnell, Jr.,                       
|Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q/A to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Accentia Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after
the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6971

Regal Beloit America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

“Made in China 2025” or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 77 (Friday, April 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 19965]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9872]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Materials Research; Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463 as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Materials Research (DMR).
    Date and Time: May 11 and 12, 1995, 8:30 am-5 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Rooms 
530 and 580, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Lorretta J. Inglehart, Program Director, 
Division of Materials Research, room 1065, National Science 
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd, Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone (703) 
306-1817.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning support for Instrument Development for Nano-Science and 
Engineering (NANO 95) proposals.
    Agenda: Evaluation of proposals.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed may include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information, financial data such as salaries, and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. 
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b.(c) (4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: April 17, 1995.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-9872 Filed 4-20-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6630

SGRE, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification of the Chief Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of WMG Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period endedJune 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edgar Bronfman, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated:August 24, 2010
#### Sandra Lynn LOWERY, Appellant, v. Raymond Allan LOWERY, Respondent.

No. 64916.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Northern Division.

Dec. 13, 1994.

Lee R. Elliott, Troy, for appellant.

Elizabeth W. Swann, Swann & Hendrix, O’Fallon, for respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and AHRENS and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Wife appeals from the child visitation provisions of a dissolution decree.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

*411The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 26, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-6713

Invacare Corp:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Cause No. DA 22-0456

In the Matter of the Estate of 

HORATIO W. BURNS,

Deceased.

ORDER DISMISSING

CROSS-APPEAL

Upon the joint and uncontested motion by the cross-appellants, 

Cameron Burns as Personal Representative of the Estate of Horatio Burns, 

and Alison Burns, to dismiss their cross-appeal, and for good reason 

appearing therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the cross-appeal in DA 22-0456 is DISMISSED. 

The case shall proceed on the issues raised by Appellant Lindsay Burns 

Barbier.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 20 2023

07/20/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0456