alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 76 (Thursday, April 20, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 19760]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9769]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[AK-962-1410-00-P; AA-11043]

Alaska Native Claims Selection

    In accordance with Departmental regulation 43 CFR 2650.7(d), notice 
is hereby given that a decision to issue conveyance under the 
provisions of Sec. 14(h)(1) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act 
of December 18, 1971, 43 U.S.C. 1601, 1613(h), will be issued to 
Chugach Alaska Corporation for approximately 15 acres. The lands 
involved are in the vicinity of Schrader Island, Alaska.

Seward Meridian, Alaska

T. 10 N., R. 12 E.

    A notice of the decision will be published once a week, for four 
(4) consecutive weeks, in the Anchorage Daily News. Copies of the 
decision may be obtained by contacting the Alaska State Office of the 
Bureau of Land Management, 222 West Seventh Avenue, #13, Anchorage, 
Alaska 99513-7599 ((907) 271-5960).
    Any party claiming a property interest which is adversely affected 
by the decision, an agency of the Federal government or regional 
corporation, shall have until May 22, 1995 to file an appeal. However, 
parties receiving service by certified mail shall have 30 days from the 
date of receipt to file an appeal. Appeals must be filed in the Bureau 
of Land Management at the address identified above, where the 
requirements for filing an appeal may be obtained. Parties who do not 
file an appeal in accordance with the requirements of 43 CFR Part 4, 
Subpart E, shall be deemed to have waived their rights.
Margaret J. McDaniel,
Acting Chief Branch of Gulf Rim Adjudication.
[FR Doc. 95-9769 Filed 4-19-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JA-P
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0092 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. MICHAEL DUNNE ,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an ext ension of time to and including November 26 , 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 19 2021

10/19/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0092
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  In connection with the Quarterly Report of W. S. INDUSTRIES, INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending February 28, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Fraser Campbell, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: April 14, 2011 By: /s/ Fraser Campell ------------------------------- Fraser Campbell Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1


                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


         In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Nascent Wine Company, Inc. for the six months ended June 30, 2008, I, Chief
Executive Officer of Nascent Wine Company, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

                    (1) such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the six months
ended June 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                    (2) the information contained in such Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 2008, fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Nascent
Wine Company, Inc.


/s/ Sandro Piancone
-------------------------------------
Sandro Piancone
Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2008
Exhibit
31.2




CERTIFICATION
OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 302


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Joseph
Tik Tung WONG, certify that:




1. 
         I have reviewed this
quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 of China
Premium Lifestyle Enterprise, Inc.




2. 
         Based on my knowledge,
this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report.




3. 
         Based on my knowledge, the
financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report.




4. 
         The registrant’s other
certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




a. 
         designed such disclosure
controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;




b. 
         evaluated the
effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and




c. 
         disclosed in this report
any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s
internal control over financial reporting.




5. 
         The registrant’s other
certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation
of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and
the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions)




a. 
         all significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and




b. 
         any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.





Date:
      May 28, 2010
            By:
            /s/
      Joseph Tik Tung WONGJoseph
      Tik Tung WONGChief
      Financial Officer, Treasurer and
Secretary
#### Ronald L. EVANS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 40904.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Jan. 3, 1989.

Gary William Smith, Sedalia, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., John P. Pollard, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before FENNER, P.J., and MANFORD and GAITAN, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from denial, without hearing, of Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED. Rule 84-16(b).
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-1569

JOHN G. SINGLETARY, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

THE CITY OF NORTH CHARLESTON; MAYOR KEITH SUMMEY; CHIEF 

EDDIE DRIGGERS; ANGELA CARTRETTE, North Charleston Clerk of Court 

Administrator,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

NORTH CHARLESTON POLICE DEPARTMENT; OFFICER JONATHAN 

GLENN; CHANNEL 5 NEWS; RAYCOM MEDIA: BRENDA RINDGE; POST & 

COURIER: THE EVENING POST INDUSTRIES; CEDRUS DAVIS & FLOYD; 

CHICORA GARDENS LLC, all jointly & severally; ERIC MCCLURE; HARVE 

JACOBS; NORTH CHARLESTON LEGAL DEPARTMENT, Law Offices of 

Brady Hair; BURGESS, on 70055FB case history report case #201003762; LINDA, 

on 70055FB case history report case #2010003762; LB, on 70055FB case history 

report case #2010003762; EDWARDSS, on 70055FB case history report case 

#2010003762; BEHRENL, on 70055FB case history report case #2010003762; 

QUICKR, on 70055FB case history report case #2010003762; OFFICER CINDY 

BARDALLO; OFFICER GLENN WILLE, appearing on original Ticket 70055FB; 

UNNAMED JUVENILE COMPLAINANT, on 70055FB Incident Media Report 

case #2010003762; MICHAEL ZOLTANSKI; WCSC STATION MANAGER; 

PETER MANIGAULT; CHARLESTON COUNTY ELECTION BOARD; 

CEDRUS LLC; ART TITUS; DEB WILLIANS; DAVIS & FLOYD; EMMITT 

DAVIS, JR.; CHICORA GARDENS HOLDING LLC; CHANNEL 5 NEWS, 

WCSC; NORTH CHARLESTON ACCOUNTING DEPARTMENT; GUTHRIS, on 

70055FB case history report case # 2010003762; WILLIAM SHARPE, 

Defendants.
2

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Charleston. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior District Judge. (2:15-cv-04463-MBS)

Submitted: April 19, 2018 Decided: April 23, 2018

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and THACKER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark W. Hardee, THE HARDEE LAW FIRM, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. 

Robin Lilley Jackson, Sandra J. Senn, SENN LEGAL, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, 

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

John G. Singletary, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 

U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons 

stated by the district court. Singletary v. The City of N. Charleston, No. 2:15-cv-04463-

MBS (D.S.C. June 21, 2016 & Mar. 31, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court 

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Rodger SELVY, Defendant/Appellant. Rodger SELVY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

Nos. 66876, 68597.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Feb. 27, 1996.

Douglas R. Hoff, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Christine M. Blegen, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and DOWD, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from his conviction by a jury of involuntary manslaughter, § 565.024, RSMo Supp.1993. He was sentenced by the court as a prior, persistent and class X offender to an eleven year prison term. Defendant also appealed from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

Defendant has failed to address any points in this appeal to the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion. That appeal is therefore considered abandoned. *See State v. Nelson,*818 S.W.2d 285, 287 (Mo.App.1991). We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error on direct appeal are without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
#### FOREST HAVEN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Appellant, v. MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF MEDICAL SERVICES, Respondent.

No. WD 47550.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

March 8, 1994.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 3, 1994.

Jonathan F. Dalton, St. Louis, for appellant.

Morris L. Woodruff, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before BERREY, C.J., P.J., and KENNEDY and ELLIS, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from decision of Circuit Court of Cole County, which affirmed the decision of the Administrative Hearing Commission denying appellant’s complaint. Appellant *493sought to have the high volume provider adjustment included in its per diem rate.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
#### Lana L. Coleman BASKETT, Relator, v. The Honorable Scott BRISTER, Judge, 234th District Court Harris County, Texas, Respondent.

No. [ AXX-XX-XXXXX ]-CV.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.).

Motion for Leave to File Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied Oct. 4, 1994, and

Opinion Oct. 6, 1994.

Before J. CURTISS BROWN, C.J., and MURPHY and ELLIS, JJ.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

On September 27, 1994, relator, Lana L. Coleman Baskett, filed her motion for leave to file her petition for writ of mandamus in *325this Court pursuant to section 22.221 Tex. Gov’t Code Ann.

While the record reflects dubious rulings by the trial court, the rules provide a trial judge with broad discretion in the management of his court’s docket. Motion for leave to file relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

ELLIS, J., would grant.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of Brooklyn Federal Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
A. Kielty, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  May 15, 2006

/S/ RICHARD A. KIELTY
-----------------------------------------------------
Richard A. Kielty
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### In the Interest of C.R., a Minor, Respondent, v. *, Appellant.

No. 67488.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Southern Division.

Dec. 19, 1995.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Feb. 20, 1996.

Application to Transfer Denied March 26, 1996.

Steven M. Kuntz, Mo. Dept, of Social Services, Div. of Legal Services, Jefferson City, for appellant.

John P. Heisserer, Cape Girardeau, for Natural Mother.

Malcolm Montgomery, Cape Girardeau, for Natural Father.

Jeffrey P. Dix, Guardian ad Litem, Jackson, for respondent.

Before CRANE, C.J., REINHARD, P.J., and AHRENS, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

The Missouri Division of Family Services appeals the Juvenile Court’s denial of its motion to set aside, pursuant to Rule 74.06(b)(4), portions of the attorney’s fees of the guardian ad litem and attorneys for *308mother and for father taxed as costs in this parental rights termination proceeding. We affirm. No error of law appears. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certificationof the Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As AdoptedPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the QuarterlyReport of WMG Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael D. Fleisher,Chief Financial Officer of WMG Acquisition Corp., certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  the Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
| Dated: May 16, 2005 | /s/ Michael D.  Fleisher |
|---------------------|--------------------------|
|                | Michael D. Fleisher      |
|                | Chief Financial Officer  |

 

1

----
#### In re the Interest J.M.J., a minor. Debbie COLLINS, Appellant, v. JUVENILE OFFICER, Respondent.

No. WD 47246.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Dec. 28, 1993.

Michael C. McIntosh, Independence, for appellant.

John R. Shank, Jr., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before BERREY, P.J., and BRECKENRIDGE and SMART, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from judgment transferring custody of minor child.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the annual report ofThe SCO Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K, for the period ended October 31,2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Darl C. McBride, President and Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

 

1.                                       The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

2.                                       The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| By:    | /s/ Darl C. McBride                   |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Darl C. McBride                       |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 
|   |                  |
|--------|-----------------------|
| Date:  | October 26, 2005 |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 105 (Thursday, June 3, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29740-29741]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-11631]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[S-42-2021]


Approval of Subzone Status; Pepperl+Fuchs, Inc., Katy, Texas

    On March 8, 2021, the Executive Secretary of the Foreign-Trade 
Zones (FTZ) Board docketed an application submitted by the Port of 
Houston Authority, grantee of FTZ 84, requesting subzone status subject 
to the existing activation limit of FTZ 84, on behalf of Pepperl+Fuchs, 
Inc., in Katy, Texas.
    The application was processed in accordance with the FTZ Act and 
Regulations, including notice in the Federal Register inviting public 
comment (86 FR 14070-14071, March 12, 2021). The FTZ staff examiner 
reviewed the application and determined that it meets the criteria for 
approval.
    Pursuant to the authority delegated to the FTZ Board Executive 
Secretary (15 CFR Sec. 400.36(f)), the application to establish Subzone 
84AC was approved on May 27, 2021, subject to the FTZ Act and the 
Board's regulations, including Section 400.13, and further subject to 
FTZ 84's 2,000-acre activation limit.


[[Page 29741]]


    Dated: May 27, 2021.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-11631 Filed 6-2-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

      ( print page 30684)    

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Thursday, July 22, 2021.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Gilbert Martinez at 1-888-912-1227 or (737) 800-4060.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee will be held Thursday, July 22, 2021, at 1:30 p.m. Eastern Time via teleconference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. For more information please contact Gilbert Martinez at 1-888-912-1227 or (737-800-4060), or write TAP Office 3651 S IH-35, STOP 1005 AUSC, Austin, TX 78741, or post comments to the website:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various committee issues for submission to the IRS and other TAP related topics. Public input is welcomed.

Dated: June 4, 2021.

Kevin Brown,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2021-12099 Filed 6-8-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form




10-Q/A

of Universal Capital Management, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended January 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph T. Drennan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Joseph T. Drennan

Joseph T. Drennan

Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

March




25,

 2008