Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 16 / Wednesday, January 24, 1996 / Notices 1915

Project Issue Issuance

date

Date expires New date

Middleville, P–11120 ............................................................. Intervenor .............................................. 12/15/95 2/13/96 3/14/96

Lower Androscoggin DEIS; Gulf Island, P–2283; Marcal,

P–11482.

DEIS Comments ...................................

10(j) .......................................................

Section 7 ...............................................

12/8/95

12/1/95

12/1/95

1/22/96

2/14/96

1/2/96

2/21/96

3/15/96

2/19/96

Boyd Dam, P–11072 ............................................................ Intervenor .............................................. 12/12/95 2/12/96 3/11/96

Scoping Comments .............................. 12/13/95 1/12/96 2/12/96

Carlyle Dam, P–11214–001 ................................................. Public Notice ......................................... 11/20/95 1/22/96 2/22/96

Gainer Dam, P–11282–001 .................................................. Notice Seeking Studies ........................ 12/18/95 1/20/96 2/20/96

Inglis Lock By-Pass, P–10893–002 ...................................... Public Notice ......................................... 10/27/95 12/26/95 1/26/95

P–1962–000, Rock Creek Cresta ......................................... REA ...................................................... 12/29/95 2/16/96 3/18/96

Menominee River Basin; P–2433–004, Grand Rapids; P–

2357–003, White Rapids; P–2394–006, Chalk Hill; P–

2536–009, LIttle Quinnesec Falls.

DEIS ..................................................... 12/1/95 1/16/96 2/15/96

P–460–001, Cushman .......................................................... DEIS ..................................................... 12/15/95 2/13/96 3/14/96

P–1988–007, Haas-Kings River ........................................... DEA ...................................................... 11/30/95 1/16/96 2/15/96

P–11557, Coleman Ranch ................................................... Application for Preliminary Permit ........ 11/1/95 1/11/96 2/11/96

P–1864–003, Bond Falls ...................................................... Scoping Document I ............................. 12/5/95 1/31/96 3/1/96

[FR Doc. 96–1059 Filed 1–23–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. CP96–122–000, et al.]

Texas Eastern Transmission

Corporation, et al.; Natural Gas

Certificate Filings

January 16, 1996.

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission:

1. Texas Eastern Transmission

Corporation

[Docket No. CP96–122–000]

Take notice that on December 27,

1995, Texas Eastern Transmission

Corporation (Texas Eastern), 5400

Westheimer Court, P.O. Box 1642,

Houston, Texas 77251–1642, filed in

Docket No. CP96–122–000 an

application pursuant to Section 7(b) of

the Natural Gas Act for permission and

approval to abandon by sale to Centana

Interstate Pipeline Company (Centana)

the Sabine Line 14–F Facilities in

Jefferson County, Texas, all as more

fully set forth in the application on file

with the Commission and open to

public inspection.

Texas Eastern proposes to abandon

the facilities which comprises 28.64

miles of 10-inch diameter pipeline, a

compressor station, and associated

meter stations, at the net book value at

the time of closing, due to its

underutilization.

Comment date: February 6, 1996, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph F

at the end of this notice.

2. NorAm Gas Transmission

Corporation

[Docket No. CP96–105–000]

Take notice that on December 15,

1995, NorAm Gas Transmission

Company (NGT), 1600 Smith Street,

Houston, Texas 77002, filed with the

Commission in Docket No. CP96–105–

000 an application pursuant to Section

7(b) of the Natural Gas Act (NGA) and

Part 157 of Commission’s Regulations

for authority to abandon by sale and

transfer to NorAm Field Services

Corporation (NFS) certain certificated

facilities located in the state of

Oklahoma, all as more fully set forth in

the application which is on file with the

the Commission and open to public

inspection.

Specifically, NGT proposes to

abandon and transfer to NFS, at net

book value at the time of closing, certain

gas supply facilities designated as the

Line O-West and Quinton facilities

consisting of approximately 106 miles of

6-inch to 16-inch diameter pipe, 6860

horsepower of compression at two

compressor stations, and appurtenant

facilities. NGT also seeks determination

that once conveyed, these facilities will

be gathering facilities exempt from the

Commission’s jurisdiction.

Comment date: February 6, 1996, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph F

at the end of this notice.

3. Columbia Gas Transmission

Corporation

[Docket No. CP96–124–000]

Take notice that on December 28,

1995, Columbia Gas Transmission

Corporation (Columbia), 1700

MacCorkle Avenue, S.E., Charleston,

West Virginia 25314–1599, filed in

Docket No. CP96–124–000 an

application pursuant to Section 7 of the

Natural Gas Act, as amended, for a

certificate of public convenience and

necessity authorizing the construction

and operation of certain replacement

natural gas storage facilities, and an

order granting abandonment of the

existing facilities being replaced, all as

more fully set forth in the application

which is on file with the the

Commission and open to public

inspection.

Specifically, Columbia requests

authorization under Sections 7(c) and

7(b) of the Natural gas Act to construct

and operate approximately 1.0 mile of

12-inch storage pipeline, replacing by

abandonment 1.0 mile of 8-inch storage

pipeline, in the Glady Storage Field,

Pocahontas County, West Virginia.

Columbia does not request

authorization for any new or additional

service through the replacement

facilities, which have an estimated cost

of $1,028,900.

Comment date: February 6, 1996, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph F

at the end of this notice.

4. Centana Intrastate Pipeline Company

[Docket No. CP96–131–000]

Take notice that on December 29,

1995, Centanna Interstate Pipeline

Company (CIPCO) P.O. Box 1642,

Houston, TX 77251–1642, filed in

Docket No. CP96–131–000 a petition

pursuant to Section 16 of the Natural

Gas Act (NGA) and Rule 207(a)(2) of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.207(a)(2), for a

declaratory order disclaiming

Commission jurisdiction over certain

facilities and the services provided

through them, all as more fully set forth

in the petition which is on file with the

Commission and open to public

inspection.

CIPCO seeks a declaratory order from

the Commission finding that the

acquisition of Texas Eastern’s Sabine

Line 14–F, the Compressor Station, and

associated meter stations located wholly

within the State of Texas, and the

ownership and operation of those

facilities by CIPCO is not subject to the

jurisdiction of the Commission under

the Natural Gas Act.
1916 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 16 / Wednesday, January 24, 1996 / Notices

Comment date: February 6, 1996, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice. Answers to the

petition for declaratory order shall also

be due on February 6, 1996.

5. Florida Gas Transmission Company

[Docket No. CP96–132–000]

Take notice that on January 4, 1996,

Florida Gas Transmission Company

(FGT), 1400 Smith Street, P.O. Box

1188, Houston, Texas 77251–1188, filed

in Docket No. CP96–132–000 a request

pursuant to Sections 157.205 and

157.212 of the Commission’s

Regulations under the Natural Gas Act

(18 CFR 157.205, 157.212) for

authorization to operate an existing

meter station as a jurisdictional facility,

under FGT’s blanket certificate issued in

Docket No. CP82–553–000 pursuant to

Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act (NGA),

all as more fully set forth in the request

that is on file with the Commission and

open to public inspection.

FGT proposes to operate an existing

meter station as a jurisdictional facility

under 7(c) of the NGA for the purpose

of transporting and delivering natural

gas for Alabama Electric Cooperative,

Inc. and Southeast Alabama Gas District

(AEC/SEAGD). FGT states that the

subject meter station, located in

Escambia County, Alabama, was

previously constructed under Section

311 of the Natural Gas Policy Act of

1978 and serves as a delivery point to

AEC/SEAGD from FTG’s existing 36-

inch and 30-inch mainlines under a firm

transportation service agreement dated

November 1, 1995. Initial gas deliveries

commenced on November 19, 1995.

FTG states that the present and

proposed quantity of natural gas

delivered at the subject meter station is

up to 16,530 MMBtu per day and

2,496,030 MMBtu annually.

FTG states that the gas quantity

proposed to be delivered to AEC/

SEAGD at the subject meter station

would be within the existing authorized

levels of service and would have no

incremental effect on FGT’s pipeline

system.

Comment date: March 1, 1996, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph G

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs

F. Any person desiring to be heard or

make any protest with reference to said

filing should on or before the comment

date file with the Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission, 825 North

Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C.

20426, a motion to intervene or a protest

in accordance with the requirements of

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and

385.214) and the Regulations under the

Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.10). All

protests filed with the Commission will

be considered by it in determining the

appropriate action to be taken but will

not serve to make the protestants parties

to the proceeding. Any person wishing

to become a party to a proceeding or to

participate as a party in any hearing

therein must file a motion to intervene

in accordance with the Commission’s

Rules.

Take further notice that, purusant to

the authority contained in and subject to

jurisdiction conferred upon the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission by

Sections 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas Act

and the Commission’s Rules of Practice

and Procedure, a hearing will be held

without further notice before the

Commission or its designee on this

filing if no motion to intervene is filed

within the time required herein, if the

Commission on its own review of the

matter finds that a grant of the

certificate is required by the public

convenience and necessity. If a motion

for leave to intervene is timely filed, or

if the Commission on its own motion

believes that a formal hearing is

required, further notice of such hearing

will be duly given.

Under the procedure herein provided

for, unless otherwise advised, it will be

unnecessary for the applicant to appear

or be represented at the hearing.

G. Any person or the Commission’s

staff may, within 45 days after the

issuance of the instant notice by the

Commission, file pursuant to Rule 214

of the Commission’s Procedural Rules

(18 CFR 385.214) a motion to intervene

or notice of intervention and pursuant

to § 157.205 of the Regulations under

the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a

protest to the request. If no protest is

filed within the time allowed therefore,

the proposed activity shall be deemed to

be authorized effective the day after the

time allowed for filing protest. If a

protest is filed and not withdrawn

within 30 days after the time allowed

for filing a protest, the instant request

shall be treated as an application for

authorization pursuant to Section 7 of

the Natural Gas Act.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 96–1066 Filed 1–23–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. RP95–182–003]

ANR Pipeline Company; Notice of

Proposed Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

January 18, 1996.

Take notice that on January 11, 1996,

ANR Pipeline Company (ANR),

tendered for filing to become part of its

FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised

Volume No. 1, the following revised

tariff sheets, to be effective on the later

on April 1, 1996 or the first day of the

month following the date of an order

accepting the filing:

Third Revised Sheet No. 90

Second Revised Sheet No. 112

Second Revised Sheet Nos. 119–122

First Revised Sheet No. 123

Second Revised Sheet No. 153

Original Sheet No. 153A

ANR states that the revised tariff

sheets are being filed in compliance

with the Commission’s Order Following

Technical Conference issued December

7, 1995.

ANR states that copies of the filing

were served upon its Second Revised

Volume No. 1 shippers and interested

state commissions.

Any person desiring to protect said

filing should file a protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

888 First Street, N.E., Washington D.C.

20426, in accordance with Section

385.211 of the Commission’s Rules and

Regulations. All such protests must be

filed as provided by Section 154.210 of

the Commission’s Regulations. Protests

will be considered by the Commission

in determining the appropriate action to

be taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Copies of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection in the Public Reference

Room.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 96–935 Filed 1–23–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Project No. 2687]

Pacific Gas and Electric Co.; Notice of

Authorization for Continued Project

Operation

January 18, 1996.

On December 20, 1993, Pacific Gas

and Electric Company, licensee for the

Pit No. 1 Project No. 2687, filed an

application for a new or subsequent

license pursuant to the Federal Power

Act (FPA) and the Commission’s

Regulations thereunder. Project No.

2687 is located on the Tule, Little Tule,

Fall, and Pit Rivers in Shasta County,

California.The license for Project No.