Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 72 / Friday, April 14, 1995 / Notices 19049

3. Is it possible to improve the diesel

risk characterization in the document,

given the inadequate exposure

information to compare to the

quantitative health assessment?

For example, will further/alternative

interpretations of the health effects

information advance the risk

characterization?

Availability of Documents

Single copies of the U.S. EPA health

assessment document may be obtained

from the Office of Research and

Development Publications Center,

CERI–FRN, U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency, 26 West Martin

Luther King Drive, Cincinnati, Ohio

45268; Telephone: (513) 569–7562; FAX

(513) 684–7566. Please provide your

name, mailing address and the EPA

document numbers EPA/600/8–90/

057Ba and Bb.

Members of the public desiring

additional information about the

meeting, including an agenda, should

contact Randall Bond, Designated

Federal Official, Clean Air Scientific

Advisory Committee, Science Advisory

Board (1400), US EPA, 401 M Street,

SW, Washington DC 20460, by

telephone at (202) 260–8414, FAX (202)

260–1889, or via The INTERNET at:

Bond.Randall@EPAMAIL.EPA.GOV.

Those individuals requiring a copy of

the draft Agenda and the charge to the

committee should contact Ms. Lori

Anne Gross at (202) 260–8414 or by

FAX at (202) 260–1889 or via the

INTERNET at

GROSS.LORI@EPAMAIL.EPA.GOV.

Additional information concerning the

Science Advisory Board, its structure,

function, and composition, may be

found in The Annual Report of the Staff

Director which is available by

contacting Ms. Gross at the previously

stated address.

Members of the public wishing to

make an oral presentation at the meeting

should contact Mr. Bond no later than

noon, Wednesday, April 26, 1995. The

request should identify the name of the

individual who will make the

presentation, requirements for audio

visual equipment (e.g., overhead

projector, 35mm projector, chalk board,

etc), and an outline of the issues to be

addressed. At least 35 copies of the

presentation and 35 copies of the visual

aids used at the meeting are to be given

to Mr. Bond no later than the time of the

presentation for distribution to the

Committee and the interested public.

See below for additional information on

providing comments to the SAB.

Providing Oral or Written Comments at

SAB Meetings

The Science Advisory Board expects

that public statements presented at its

meetings will not be repetitive of

previously submitted oral or written

statements. In general, each individual

or group making an oral presentation

will be limited to a total time of ten

minutes. Written comments (at least 35

copies) received in the SAB Staff Office

sufficiently prior to a meeting date, may

be mailed to the relevant SAB

committee or subcommittee prior to its

meeting; comments received too close to

the meeting date will normally be

provided to the committee at its

meeting. Written comments may be

provided to the relevant committee or

subcommittee up until the time of the

meeting.

Dated: April 6, 1995.

Donald G. Barnes,

Staff Director, Science Advisory Board.

[FR Doc. 95–9246 Filed 4–13–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

[FRL 5191–6]

Public Water System Supervision

Program Revision for the State of

Wisconsin

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given in

accordance with the provision of § 1413

of the Safe Drinking Water Act, as

amended, 42 U.S.C. 300f et seq., and 40

CFR part 142, subpart B, the National

Primary Drinking Water Regulations

(NPDWR), that the State of Wisconsin is

revising its approved Public Water

System Supervision (PWSS) primacy

program. The Wisconsin Department of

Natural Resources (WDNR) adopted

drinking water regulations for 18

synthetic organic chemicals (SOCs), and

5 inorganic chemicals (IOCs), that

correspond to the NPDWR for SOCs and

IOCs, promulgated by the U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency (U.S.

EPA) on July 17, 1992 (57 FR 31776–

31849). The U.S. EPA has completed its

review of Wisconsin’s PWSS primacy

program revision and has determined

that the State program revision is no less

stringent than the corresponding

Federal regulations.

The U.S. EPA has determined that the

Wisconsin rule revision meets the

requirements of the Federal rule.

Therefore, the U.S. EPA is proposing to

approve the WDNR’s rule revision. All

interested parties are invited to submit

written comments on this proposed

determination, and may request a public

hearing on or before May 15, 1995. If a

public hearing is requested and granted,

the determination shall not become

effective until such time following the

hearing, at which the Regional

Administrator issues an order affirming

or rescinding this action. Frivolous or

insubstantial requests for a hearing may

be denied by the Regional

Administrator.

Requests for public hearing should be

addressed to: Miguel A. Del Toral, (WD–

17J), U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson

Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.

Any request for a public hearing shall

include the following: (1) The name,

address, and telephone number of the

individual, organization, or other entity

requesting a hearing. (2) A brief

statement of the requesting person’s

interest in the Regional Administrator’s

determinations and of information that

the requesting person intends to submit

at such hearing. (3) The signature of the

individual making the request; or, if the

request is made on behalf of an

organization or other entity, the

signature of a responsible official of the

organization or other entity.

Notice of any hearing shall be given

not less than fifteen (15) days prior to

the time scheduled for the hearing. Such

notice will be made by the Regional

Administrator in the Federal Register

and in newspapers of general

circulation in the State of Wisconsin. A

notice will be sent to the person(s)

requesting the hearing as well as to the

State of Wisconsin. The hearing notice

will include a statement of purpose,

information regarding the time and

location, and the address and telephone

number where interested persons may

obtain further information. The Regional

Administrator will issue an order

affirming or rescinding his

determination upon review of the

hearing record. Should the

determination be affirmed, it will

become effective as of the date of the

order.

Should no timely and appropriate

request for a hearing be received, and

should the Regional Administrator not

elect to hold a hearing on his own

motion, these determinations shall

become effective on May 15, 1995.

Please bring this notice to the attention

of any persons known by you to have an

interest in these determinations.

All documents related to these

determinations are available for

inspection between the hours of 8:30

a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through

Friday, at the following offices:

Wisconsin Department of Natural

Resources, Bureau of Water Supply,
19050 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 72 / Friday, April 14, 1995 / Notices

101 South Webster, Madison,

Wisconsin 53707, State Docket

Officer: Mr. Don Swailes, (608) 266–

7093

Safe Drinking Water Branch, Drinking

Water Section, U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West

Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois

60604–3590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Miguel A. Del Toral, Region 5, Drinking

Water Section at the Chicago address

given above, telephone 312/886–5253.

(Sec. 1413 of the Safe Drinking Water Act, as

amended (1986), and 40 CFR 142.10 of the

National Primary Drinking Water

Regulations)

Signed this 3rd day of April 1995.

David A. Ullrich,

Acting Regional Administrator, U.S. EPA,

Region 5.

[FR Doc. 95–9250 Filed 4–13–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

Public Information Collections

Approved by Office of Management

and Budget

April 6, 1995.

The Federal Communications

Commission (FCC) has received Office

of Management and Budget (OMB)

approval for the following public

information collections pursuant to the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, Pub.

L. 96–511. For further information

contact Shoko B. Hair, Federal

Communications Commission, (202)

418–1379.

Federal Communications Commission

OMB Control No.: 3060–0149.

Expiration Date: 03/31/98.

Title: Part 63—Section 214

Application and Supplemental

Information Requirements (Sections

63.01–63.601).

Estimated Annual Burden: 6820 total

annual hours; 13 hours per response.

Description: In Telephone CompanyCable Television Cross-Ownership

Rules, Sections 63.54–63.58, CC Docket

87–266, Memorandum Opinion and

Order on Reconsideration and Third

Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,

FCC 94–269 (released November 7,

1994), the Commission requires, among

other things, local exchange carriers

(LECs) providing video dialtone service

to notify the Chief of the Common

Carrier Bureau of any anticipated or

existing capacity shortfall in their video

dialtone platform and of plans for

addressing such shortfall. Such notice

must be provided within thirty days

after the LEC becomes aware of an

anticipated shortfall or within five days

after denying capacity to a video

programmer, whichever occurs first.

The Commission also conforms its

existing enhanced services safeguards

against anticompetitive conduct by

adding video dialtone delivery service

to the service categories for which it

requires that Regional Bell Operating

Companies (RBOCs) and GTE Service

Corporation (GTE) report installation

and maintenance activities. In addition,

the Commission requires the RBOCs and

GTE to file a detailed description of the

types of Customer Proprietary Network

Information to which they anticipate

having access as providers of video

dialtone service, and to explain how

they would plan to use such

information in marketing video dialtone

services to video programmers or

consumers.

Federal Communications Commission.

William F. Caton,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–9187 Filed 4–13–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712–01–F

Public Information Collection

Requirement Submitted to Office of

Management and Budget for Review

April 10, 1995.

The Federal Communications

Commission has submitted the

following information collection

requirement to OMB for review and

clearance under the Paperwork

Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 3507).

Copies of this submission may be

purchased from the Commission’s copy

contractor, International Transcription

Service, Inc., 2100 M Street, N.W., Suite

140, Washington, DC 20037, (202) 857–

3800. For further information on this

submission contact Judy Boley, Federal

Communications Commission, (202)

418–0214. Persons wishing to comment

on this information collection should

contact Timothy Fain, Office of

Management and Budget, Room 10236

NEOB, Washington, DC 20503, (202)

395–3561.

Please note: On February 25, 1994

The Commission issued a Final Rule

(contained in the First Report and Order

to PP Docket 93–253) implementing

Section 309(1) of the Communications

Act—Competitive Bidding. This rule

requires that an application for

voluntary transfer of control or

assignment under §§ 1.924, 21.38, 22.39,

90.153, 94.47, and 95.821 where the

license was acquired by the transferor or

assignor through a system of random

selection shall together with its

application for transfer of control or

assignment, file with the Commission

the associated contracts for sale, option

agreements, management agreements, or

other documents disclosing the

consideration that the applicant would

receive in return for the transfer or

assignment of its license. This

information should include not only a

monetary purchase price, but also any

future, contingent, inkind, or other

consideration (e.g., management or

consulting contracts either with or

without an option to purchase; belowmarket financing). These limited

reporting requirements will enable the

Commission to evaluate whether further

restrictions are needed.

At that time the Commission

determined the new or modified

information collection and/or record

retention requirements imposed by this

Rule were not subject to the Paperwork

Reduction Act of 1980 44 U.S.C. 3501–

3520. Upon further evaluation, the

Commission is now requesting

expedited OMB review of this item by

April 18, 1995, under the provisions of

5 CFR 1320.18.

OMB Number: None.

Title: Implementation of Section 309(j)

of the Communications Act,

Competitive Bidding, PP Docket 93–

253, First Report and Order.

Action: Existing collection in use

without OMB control number.

Respondents: Business or other forprofit.

Frequency of Response: On occassion.

Estimated Annual Burden: 1,100

respondents; 1 hour per response;

1,100 hours total annual burden.

Needs and Uses: The Commission will

use the information to determine

whether the public interest would be

served by granting a transfer of

control or an assignment of a license

awarded through lottery procedures.

The foregoing estimates include the

time for reviewing instructions,

searching existing data sources,

gathering and maintaining the data

needed, and completing and reviewing

the burden estimates or any other aspect

of the collection of information

including suggestions for reducing the

burden to the Federal Communications

Commission, Records Management

Branch, Paperwork Reduction Project,

Washington, DC 20554.

Federal Communications Commission.

William F. Caton,

Acting Secretary.

First Report and Order

In the Matter of: Implementation of Section

309(j) of the Communications Act

Competitive Bidding. PP Docket 93–253.