alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of Brooklyn Federal Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Angelo
J. Di Lorenzo, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


Date:  May 16, 2005

/s/ Angelo J. Di Lorenzo
------------------------------------------
Angelo J. Di Lorenzo
President and Chief Executive Officer


                                       22
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Export-Import Bank

# TIME AND DATE:

Thursday, June 10, 2021 from 2:00-4:30 p.m. EDT.

# PLACE:

The meeting will be held virtually.

# STATUS:

*Public Participation:* The meeting will be open to public participation and time will be allotted for questions or comments submitted online. Members of the public may also file written statements before or after the meeting to *external@exim.gov*. Interested parties may register for the meeting at *https://app.smartsheet.com/​b/​form/​962a72a980114463a90ba5752d549566*.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Discussion of EXIM policies and programs designed to support the expansion of financing support for U.S. manufactured goods and services in Sub-Saharan Africa.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

For further information, contact India Walker, External Engagement Specialist at 202-480-0062.

Joyce B. Stone,

Assistant Corporate Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2021-11437 Filed 5-26-21; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
#### STATE *of*Missouri, Respondent, v. Stephen HENDERSON, Appellant.

No. 65186.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

March 21, 1995.

N. Scott Rosenblum, Ramona L. Marten, Wittner, Poger, Rosenblum & Spewak, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., David G. Brown, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before AHRENS, P.J., and SIMON and KAROHL, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the judgment of conviction of selling a controlled substance in violation of § 195.211. Defendant was sentenced to ten years imprisonment.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 83 (Monday, April 29, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 18767]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10449]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice No. 2372]


United States International Telecommunications Advisory 
Committee, Radiocommunications Sector, Study Group 8--Mobile Services 
Meeting Notice

    The Department of State announces that the United States 
International Telecommunications Advisory Committee (ITAC), 
Radiocommunication Sector Study Group 8--Mobile Services will meet on 
16 May 1996 at 10 AM to 1 PM, in room 3524 at the Department of State, 
2201 C Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20520.
    Study Group 8 studies and develops recommendations concerning 
technical and operating characteristics of mobile, radiodetermination, 
amateur and related satellite services.
    This May meeting will continue preparations for the October 28, 
1996 international meeting of Study Group 8. It will also review 
activities concerning the Inter-American Telecommunication Commission 
Permanent Consultative Committee III--Radiocommunications, and begin 
preparations for the August 19-23 meeting of PCC.III.
    A meeting of U.S. Working Party 8E dealing with the Amateur Radio 
service will be convened by Mr. Paul Rinaldo beginning at 1:30 P.M. in 
room 3524.
    Members of the General Public may attend these meetings and join in 
the discussions, subject to the instructions of the Chairman, John T. 
Gilsenan.

    Note: If you wish to attend please send a fax to 202-647-7407 
not later than 24 hours before the scheduled meeting. On this fax, 
please include subject meeting, your name, social security number, 
and date of birth. One of the following valid photo ID's will be 
required for admittance: U.S. driver's license with your picture on 
it, U.S. passport, U.S. Government ID (company ID's are no longer 
accepted by Diplomatic Security). Enter from the ``C'' Street Main 
Lobby.

    Dated: April 18, 1996.
Warren G. Richards,
Chairman, U.S. ITAC for ITU-Radiocommunication Sector.
[FR Doc. 96-10449 Filed 4-26-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-45-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 26, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-6728

Invacare Corp:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
#### Donald L. DIXON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD42000.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Jan. 16, 1990.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Feb. 27, 1990.

Application to Transfer Denied April 17, 1990.

James R. Hobbs, Linde Thomson Lang-worthy Kohn & Van Dyke, Kansas City, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for Respondent.

Before BERREY, P.J., and TURNAGE and ULRICH, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appeal after partial remand in *Dixon v. State,*763 S.W.2d 204 (Mo.App.1988), from denial of post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 27.26.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of WMG Acquisition Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael D. Fleisher, Chief Financial Officer of WMG Acquisition Corp., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 5, 2006



/s/    MICHAEL D.
FLEISHERMichael D. FleisherChief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5405 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5405

 To ensure that a fair percentage of Federal cancer research funds are 
                dedicated to pediatric cancer research.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 12, 2023

   Mr. Fitzpatrick (for himself, Mr. Evans, Ms. Stefanik, Ms. Lee of 
 Nevada, Mr. Kelly of Pennsylvania, and Mr. Gottheimer) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To ensure that a fair percentage of Federal cancer research funds are 
                dedicated to pediatric cancer research.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fairness to Kids with Cancer Act of 
2023''.

SEC. 2. PERCENTAGE OF FEDERAL CANCER RESEARCH FUNDS REQUIRED TO BE USED 
              FOR PEDIATRIC CANCER RESEARCH.

    (a) In General.--For fiscal year 2024 and each subsequent fiscal 
year, the President shall ensure that, of the total amount of Federal 
funds obligated for cancer research, the percentage obligated for 
pediatric cancer research is equal to the percentage described in 
subsection (b).
    (b) Percentage.--The percentage described in this subsection is the 
percentage constituted by the ratio of the number of individuals who 
are under the age of 18 residing in the United States at the end of the 
fiscal year preceding the fiscal year to which subsection (a) is being 
applied, to the total number of individuals residing in the United 
States at such time, as determined by the Bureau of the Census.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.1


 


SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES
TRUST


 


Summary of Trustee Compensation


 


The following is a summary of the currently effective
compensation of the trustees of Senior Housing Properties Trust (the “Company”)
for services as trustees, which is subject to modification at any time by the
Board of Trustees.


 


·                  Each independent trustee receives an annual fee of
$30,000, plus a fee of $750 for each meeting attended.  Up to two $750 fees are payable if a board
meeting and one or more board committee meetings are held on the same date.


 


·                  The chairpersons of the audit committee, the
compensation committee and the nominating and governance committee, each of
whom is an independent trustee, receive an additional annual fee of $9,000,
$4,500 and $4,500, respectively.


 


·                  Each trustee is entitled to receive a grant of 2,000
of the Company’s common shares of beneficial interest on the date of the first
board meeting following each annual meeting of shareholders (or, for trustees
who are first elected or appointed at other times, on the day of the first
board meeting attended).


 


·                  The Company generally reimburses all trustees for
travel expenses incurred in connection with their duties as trustees.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SS. 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-KSB of Markland Technologies,
Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, to their best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/S/ ROBERT TARINI                            /S/ KENNETH P. DUCEY, JR.
----------------------------                 ----------------------------
ROBERT TARINI                                KENNETH P. DUCEY, JR.
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER                      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

DATE:  October 20, 2004                      DATE:  October 20, 2004
EXHIBIT 32 .01





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION


906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of FormCap Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),





I, Bradley Moynes, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated: April 15, 2015


Signature: /s/ Bradley Moynes


Bradley Moynes


Chief Executive Officer
NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 23-2443

__________

JAMES MOSLEY, 

 Appellant

v.

CITY OF PHILADELPHIA; DANIEL J. ANDERS

____________________________________

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-02248) 

District Judge: Honorable Mia R. Perez

____________________________________

Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)

January 17, 2024

Before: JORDAN, PHIPPS, and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed: January 19, 2024) 

___________

OPINION*

___________. 

PER CURIAM

James Mosley, proceeding pro se, appeals from the District Court’s dismissal of 

his complaint with prejudice. For following reasons, we will affirm. 

* This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not 

constitute binding precedent.
2 

Mosley filed suit against the Honorable Daniel J. Anders of the Philadelphia Court 

of Common Pleas and the City of Philadelphia, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Dkt. No. 

2. Mosley alleged that Judge Anders violated his due process rights and acted 

negligently and discriminatorily when he issued an order stating that Mosley could not 

represent an estate pro se. Id. at 3 & 7. Mosley sought compensatory damages and 

injunctive relief. Id. at 4. The District Court screened the action under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(e) and dismissed the complaint with prejudice. Dkt. No. 4. Mosley timely filed a 

notice of appeal. Dkt. No. 6. 

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Our review of the sua sponte 

dismissal of a complaint under § 1915(e) is plenary.1

 Dooley v. Wetzel, 957 F.3d 366, 

373 (3d Cir. 2020). 

To the extent Mosley argues on appeal that the District Court erred in dismissing 

his claims against Judge Anders, we disagree. Mosley’s claims for money damages 

based on Judge Anders’ order are barred by judicial immunity. See Figueroa v. 

Blackburn, 208 F.3d 435, 440-42 (3d Cir. 2000). To the extent Mosley challenges the 

constitutionality of the rule prohibiting a pro se litigant from representing an estate, Judge 

Anders is not the proper defendant because he did not promulgate the rule; rather, he

1 We do not review issues Mosley has not argued on appeal, such as the District Court’s 

dismissal of his claims against the City of Philadelphia. See Barna v. Bd. of Sch. Dirs. of 

Panther Valley Sch. Dist., 877 F.3d 136, 145-47 (3d Cir. 2017) (explaining that an 

appellant’s failure to raise an argument constitutes forfeiture of that argument). We 

recognize that Mosley’s brief is sparse, but we construe his pro se filings liberally and 

will review his arguments. See Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007) (per curiam). 
3 

acted as its “neutral and impartial arbiter.” Allen v. DeBello, 861 F.3d 433, 440-42 (3d 

Cir. 2017) (where judges did not initiate the action, promulgate the statute or judicial 

standard, or serve an administrative function, they acted in adjudicatory capacity and 

were not proper defendants for challenging the standard). 

Accordingly, we will affirm the judgment of the District Court.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6940

Goodman Manufacturing Company, L.P.: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions.

pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Solely for the purposes of complying with, and the extent required by 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies, in his capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of BlastGard International, Inc., that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report of the company on Form 10-KSB
for the period ended December 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
companys financial condition and results of operations.



|                                        
|----------------------------------------
|March 31, 2005                          
|                                        
|/s/ James F. Gordon                     
|James F. Gordon, Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32



<PAGE>

     In connection with the quarterly report of Kranem Corporation d/b/a
Learningwire.com, (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report") Stephen K. Smith, the Principal Executive Officer of the Company
and Michael Grove, the Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of their knowledge:



     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the company.


May 1, 2009                      By:  /s/ Stephen K. Smith
                                     -------------------------------------
                                     Stephen K. Smith, President and
                                     Chief Executive Officer



May 11, 2009                     By:  /s/ Michael Grove
                                     -------------------------------------
                                     Michael Grove, Principal Financial and
                                     Accounting Officer