alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 81 (Thursday, April 25, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 18371]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10259]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
[Docket No. 96-021-1]


Secretary's Advisory Committee on Foreign Animal and Poultry 
Diseases; Meeting

AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are giving notice of a meeting of the Secretary's Advisory 
Committee on Foreign Animal and Poultry Diseases.

PLACE, DATES, AND TIME OF MEETING: The meeting will be held in 
Conference Rooms B, C, and D of the USDA Center at Riverside, 4700 
River Road, Riverdale, MD. The Committee will meet on May 15-16, 1996. 
Sessions will be held from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. on May 15, and from 8 a.m. 
until noon on May 16.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. John Williams, Chief Staff 
Veterinarian, Emergency Programs, VS, APHIS, Suite 3B08, 4700 River 
Road Unit 41, Riverdale, MD 20737-1236, (301) 734-8073.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Secretary`s Advisory Committee on 
Foreign Animal and Poultry Diseases (Committee) advises the Secretary 
of Agriculture of means to suppress, control, or eradicate an outbreak 
of foot-and-mouth disease, or other destructive foreign animal or 
poultry diseases, in the event these diseases should enter the United 
States. The Committee also advises the Secretary of Agriculture on 
prevention of these diseases.
    The meeting will focus on emergency preparedness and will be open 
to the public. However, due to time constraints, the public will not be 
allowed to participate in the Committee's discussions. Written 
statements concerning the meeting topic may be filed with the Committee 
before or after the meeting by sending them to Dr. John Williams at the 
address listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
    This notice of meeting is given pursuant to section 10 of the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act.

    Done in Washington, DC, this 19th day of April 1996.
Terry L. Medley,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 96-10259 Filed 4-24-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of American Bio Medica Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2010 (the “Report”), I, Stan
Cipkowski, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Stan CipkowskiStan
      CipkowskiChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)March
      30, 2010
#### Loretta ROWE and Donald L. Slyter, Trustee, Appellants, v. Robert G. COTITTA, Harvey Sides, and C-XXXII Properties, Respondents.

No. WD 49562.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

May 9, 1995.

Lawrence R. McClure, Marshall, for appellant.

H. Vincent Monslow, Kansas City, for respondents.

Before SPINDEN, P.J., and ULRICH and SMART, JJ.

*238ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Loretta Rowe appeals the trial court’s judgment that C-XXXII Properties is not obligated to pay Rowe the balance due on a promissory note on which C-XXXII defaulted. C-XXXII had used the note to buy property from Rowe. The court concluded that C-XXXII owed Rowe nothing more after it returned the property to her. We affirm. Discerning no jurisprudential value to publishing an opinion, we issue this summary order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT 23.1


                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Diametrics Medical, Inc.:



We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos.
33-83572, 33-97540, 333-24167 and 333-24169) on Form S-8 and (No.333-24079) on
Form S-3 of Diametrics Medical, Inc. of our report dated February 21, 1997,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Diametrics Medical, Inc. as of
December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, common shareholders' equity (deficit) and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1996, which report is
incorporated by reference in the annual report on Form 10-K of Diametrics
Medical, Inc.
                                      /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 28, 1997
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 82 (Friday, April 26, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18622-18623]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10311]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Availability of Plan of Operations; Mining Operation; Jo Claim 
Group; Death Valley National Park; Inyo & San Bernardino Counties, CA 
and Esmeralda & Nye Counties, NV

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with Section 9.17(a) of Title 
36 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 9, Subpart A, that the 
National Park

[[Page 18623]]

Service has received from Mr. Joe Ostranger a Plan of Operations to 
remove a limited quantity of stockpiled ore from the JO claim group in 
Death Valley National Park.
    The Plan of Operations is available for public review and comment 
for a period of 30 days from the publication of this notice. Analysis 
of the proposal will proceed from the date of its receipt. The document 
can be viewed during normal business hours at the Office of the 
Superintendent, Death Valley National Park, Death Valley, California, 
92328.

    Dated: April 7, 1996.
Richard H. Martin,
Superintendent.
[FR Doc. 96-10311 Filed 4-25-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7129

United Scope LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_05.09.19.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Solely for the purposes of complying with, and the extent required by 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies, in his capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of BlastGard International, Inc. (formerly Opus Resource Group, Inc.), that, to his knowledge, the Annual
Report of the company on Form 10-KSB, as amended, for the period ended December 31, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the companys financial condition and results of operations.



March 15, 2005



|                                        
|----------------------------------------
|/s/ James F. Gordon                     
|James F. Gordon, Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6154
JUAN P. MCLENDON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:06-cv-00655-jlk) Submitted: April 19, 2007 Decided: April 25, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Juan P. McLendon, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Juan P. McLendon appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his action filed under the Federal Torts Claims Act and denying his motion to amend the complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McLendon v. United States , No. 7:06-cv-00655-jlk (W.D. Va. Dec. 14, 2006; Jan. 11, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### TRANSPORT INDEMNITY CO., et al. v. ORGAIN, BELL & TUCKER, et al.

No. D-3474.

Supreme Court of Texas.

June 16, 1993.

K. Jill Vandagriff and Arthur K. Smith, Dallas, for petitioners.

John P. Scott, Houston, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioners’ application for writ of error is denied. The Court neither approves nor disapproves of the court of appeals’ 846 S.W.2d 878, analysis of the issue of bad faith under Tex.Bus. & Com.Code § 17.50(c).
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of U.S. Helicopter Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the
period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date  hereof (the Report), I, John G. Murphy, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my  knowledge:

1) The
Report fully complies with  the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and

2) The
information contained in  the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results  of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 15, 2006

| |  | /s/ John G. Murphy                                  | 
| |  | --------------------------------------------------- | 
| |  | John G. MurphyPresident and Chief Executive Officer |
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 105 (Thursday, June 3, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 29735-29736]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-11676]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Parts 1, 2, and 27

[WT Docket No 19-348; Report No. 3174; FRS 28894]


Petition for Reconsideration of Action in Rulemaking Proceeding

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Petition for Reconsideration.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Petitions for Reconsideration (Petitions) have been filed in 
the Commission's rulemaking proceeding by David Silver, on behalf of 
The Aerospace Industries Association; D. Cary Mitchell, on behalf of 
The Blooston Rural Carriers; and Carri Bennet, on behalf of The Rural 
Wireless Association, Inc.

DATES: Oppositions to the Petition must be filed on or before June 18, 
2021. Replies to an opposition must be filed on or before June 28, 
2021.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, 
Washington, DC 20554.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joyce Jones, Wireless 
Telecommunications Bureau, Mobility Division, (202) 418-1327 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#afc5c0d6ccca81c5c0c1cadcefc9cccc81c8c0d9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cba1a4b2a8aee5a1a4a5aeb88bada8a8e5aca4bd">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's 
document, Report No. 3174, released May 20, 2021. The full text of the 
Petitions can be accessed online via the Commission's Electronic 
Comment Filing System at: http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/. The Commission 
will not send a Congressional Review Act (CRA) submission to Congress 
or the Government Accountability Office pursuant to the CRA, 5 U.S.C. 
801(a)(1)(A), because no rules are being adopted by the Commission.
    Subject: Facilitating Shared Use in the 3100-3550 MHz Band, FCC 21-
32, 86 FR 17920, April 7, 2021, WT Docket No. 19-348. This document is 
being published pursuant to 47 CFR 1.429(e). See also 47 CFR 1.4(b)(1) 
and 1.429(f), (g).
    Number of Petitions Filed: 3.


[[Page 29736]]


Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene Dortch,
Secretary, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-11676 Filed 6-2-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002







In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FSP Galleria North Corp.
(the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2009as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), the undersigned, George J. Carter, President and principal
executive officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that, to his knowledge:




(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and







(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.










Date:  August
      7, 2009
            /s/ George J.
      Carter
              George
      J. Carter
              President
              (Principal Executive
      Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 74 (Tuesday, April 18, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 19447]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9451]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Customs Service


Quarterly IRS Interest Rates Used in Calculating Interest on 
Overdue Accounts and Refunds on Customs Duties

AGENCY: U.S. Customs Service, Department of the Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of calculation and interest.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice advises the public of an increase in the quarterly 
Internal Revenue Service interest rates used to calculate interest on 
overdue accounts and refunds of Customs duties. For the quarter 
beginning April 1, 1995, the rates will be 9 percent for overpayments 
and 10 percent for underpayments. This notice is published for the 
convenience of the importing public and Customs personnel.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 1, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Harry Bunn, U.S. Customs Service, 
National Finance Center, Revenue Accounting Branch, 6026 Lakeside 
Boulevard, Indianapolis, Indiana 46278, (317) 298-1252.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1505 and Treasury Decision 85-93, published 
in the Federal Register on May 29, 1985 (50 FR 21832), the interest 
rate paid on applicable overpayments or underpayments of Customs duties 
shall be in accordance with the Internal Revenue Code rate established 
under 26 U.S.C. 6621 and 6622. Interest rates are determined based on 
the short-term Federal rate. The interest rate that Treasury pays on 
overpayments will be the short-term Federal rate plus two percentage 
points. The interest rate paid to the Treasury for underpayments will 
be the short-term Federal rate plus three percentage points. The rates 
will be rounded to the nearest full percentage.
    The interest rates are determined by the Internal Revenue Service 
on behalf of the Secretary of the Treasury based on the average market 
yield on outstanding marketable obligations of the U.S. with remaining 
periods to maturity of 3 years or less, and fluctuate quarterly. The 
rates effective for a quarter are determined during the first-month 
period of the previous quarter. The rates of interest for the third 
quarter of fiscal year (FY) 1995 (the period of April 1-June 30, 1995) 
are increased to 9 percent for overpayments and 10 percent for 
underpayments. These rates will remain in effect through June 30, 1995, 
and are subject to change for the fourth quarter of FY-995 (the period 
of July 1-September 30, 1995).

    Dated: April 11, 1995.
George J. Weise,
Commissioner of Customs.
[FR Doc. 95-9451 Filed 4-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4820-02-P
**EXHIBIT 32.02**

**Section 1350 Certification**

In connection with this quarterly report of ML WintonFuturesAccess LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September30, 2007 as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof(this “Report”), I, Barbra E. Kocsis, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. This Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in this Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.
| Date: November 14, 2007                      |                 |
|----------------------------------------------|----------------------|
|                                         |
| By                                           | /s/ BARBRA E. KOCSIS |   |
| Barbra E. Kocsis                             |
| Chief Financial Officer                      |
| (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|                                              |                      |  |  |

 

----
|   | 1.              The      quarterly report of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2009 as      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the      “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934; and |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2.              The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

|   | /s/ J. Lloyd      Breedlove                   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | J.      Lloyd Breedlove                                                                                        |
|   | Chief      Executive Officer                                                                                   |
|   | February      16, 2010                                                                                         |
|   |                                                                                                           |
|   | /s/ Stephen      Hoelscher               |
|   | Stephen      Hoelscher                                                                                         |
|   | Chief      Financial Officer                                                                                   |
|   | February      16, 2010                                                                                         |
1 ... T h i s pr oce edi n g a r i s es ou t of Cau s e N o. 960567 , s t y l ed The St at e of Texas v. V

i ct or R ay , p e n d ing i n t he C o unt y C o urt at Law N o . 7, B exar C o unt y , T exas , t he H o no rable M o ni ca G uerrer o p res i d i ng. i i i i i i



### MEM ORA ND UM OP INION No
. 04 -0 8- 00 81 4- CR IN RE Victor RAY Orig inal Mandamus Proce eding 1 PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Alma L . L ópez, Chief J ustice Phy lis J . Speedlin , J ustice Rebec ca Simmons, J ustice Deliver ed and F iled: Dec ember 10, 2008 PETI TI ON F OR WR I T OF MANDAMUS DEN I ED On Novembe r 4, 2008, relator Victor Ray filed a petition for writ of m andamus, c omplaining of the trial c ourt’s fa ilure to rule on va rious motions. C ounsel has been appointed to repr esent re lator in the trial court. We conc lude that re lator’s a ppointed counsel in the trial c ourt is also his counsel for a n orig inal proce eding on the issue pre sented. To obtain mandamus re lief in a c riminal matter, the r elator must establish: (1) the a ct soug ht to be compelled is minist eria l rathe r t han dis cre tionary in nature , and (2) there is no adequate re medy at law. De le on v . D ist

ric t Cle rk, 187 S.W .3d 473, 474 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Respondent has no min ist e ri a l duty

to r ule on re lator ’s pro se motions b ec au se re lator is repr esente d by appointed04
- 08
- 00 81 4- CR

- 2- counsel a nd is not entitl ed to hy

brid repr esentation. Se e Ro bin so n v . S tate , 240 S
. W
. 3 d 9 1 9 , 922 (T e x. Cr im. Ap p. 20 07 ); Pa tri c k v . S tate , 906 S.W .2d 481, 498 (T ex . Crim. App. 1995). Consequently , the re spondent did not violate a ministerial duty by decl i n i n g t o rul e on re lator’s mot ion s. Th e refore, th is c ourt ha s d e te rm ine d th a t r e lator is n ot e nti tle d to the re lie f s ou g ht. Acc ording ly , relator’s petition for wr it of mandamus is denied. T EX . R. A PP . P. 52.8(a). PER C URI AM DO NOT PUBL I SH