Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 104 / Wednesday, June 2, 2021 / Notices 29595 

pertinent to the reviews by June 2, 2021. 

However, should the Department of 

Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) extend the 

time limit for its completion of the final 

results of its reviews, the deadline for 

comments (which may not contain new 

factual information) on Commerce’s 

final results is three business days after 

the issuance of Commerce’s results. If 

comments contain business proprietary 

information (BPI), they must conform 

with the requirements of sections 201.6, 

207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s 

rules. The Commission’s Handbook on 

Filing Procedures, available on the 

Commission’s website at https://

www.usitc.gov/documents/handbook_

on_filing_procedures.pdf, elaborates 

upon the Commission’s procedures with 

respect to filings. 

In accordance with sections 201.16(c) 

and 207.3 of the rules, each document 

filed by a party to the reviews must be 

served on all other parties to the reviews 

(as identified by either the public or BPI 

service list), and a certificate of service 

must be timely filed. The Secretary will 

not accept a document for filing without 

a certificate of service. 

Determination.—The Commission has 

determined these reviews are 

extraordinarily complicated and 

therefore has determined to exercise its 

authority to extend the review period by 

up to 90 days pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 

1675(c)(5)(B). 

Authority: These reviews are being 

conducted under authority of title VII of the 

Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published 

pursuant to section 207.62 of the 

Commission’s rules. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: May 26, 2021. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2021–11501 Filed 6–1–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1251] 

Certain Cellular Signal Boosters, 

Repeaters, Bi-Directional Amplifiers, 

and Components Thereof (III); 

Commission Determination Not To 

Review an Initial Determination 

Terminating the Investigation Based 

on Settlement; Termination of the 

Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) 

(Order No. 9) of the presiding 

administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) 

terminating the investigation based on 

settlement. The investigation is 

terminated. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Amanda Fisherow, Esq., Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

205–3179. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. 

Hearing-impaired persons are advised 

that information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal, telephone 

(202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

February 25, 2021, the Commission 

instituted this investigation based on a 

complaint filed by Wilson Electronics 

LLC of St. George, Utah. 86 FR 11552– 

53 (Feb. 25, 2021). The complaint, as 

supplemented, alleged violations of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), based on the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, or the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain cellular signal boosters, 

repeaters, bi-directional amplifiers, and 

components thereof by reason of 

infringement of certain claims of eleven 

patents, including U.S. Patent Nos. 

7,486,929 (‘‘the ’929 patent’’); 7,409,186 

(‘‘the ’186 patent’’); 8,755,399 (‘‘the ’399 

patent’’); and 8,849,187 (‘‘the ’187 

patent’’). Id. at 11553. The complaint, as 

supplemented, further alleged that a 

domestic industry exists. Id. The 

Commission instituted three separate 

investigations, and defined the scope of 

the present investigation as whether 

there is a violation of section 337 based 

on the allegations of infringement as to 

the asserted claims of the ’929, ’186, 

’399, and ’187 patents as to the accused 

products identified in the notice of 

investigation. Id. The notice of 

investigation named two respondents: 

Cellphone-Mate, Inc. d/b/a SureCall of 

Fremont, California; and Shenzhen 

SureCall Communication Technology 

Co., Ltd. of Shenzhen, China. Id. The 

Office of Unfair Import Investigations is 

not named as a party. Id. 

On May 12, 2021, the parties jointly 

moved to terminate this investigation 

based on a settlement agreement. On 

May 13, 2021, the ALJ issued the subject 

ID granting the joint motion to terminate 

the investigation. The ID explained that 

the parties provided confidential and 

public versions of the settlement 

agreement. ID at 2. The parties also 

stated that there are no other 

agreements, written or oral, express or 

implied, regarding the subject matter of 

this Investigation. Id. The ID concluded 

that termination of the investigation is 

in the public interest. Id. No petitions 

for review were filed. 

The Commission has determined not 

to review the subject ID. The 

investigation is terminated. 

The Commission vote for this 

determination took place on May 27, 

2021. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 

210 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 

210). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: May 27, 2021. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2021–11593 Filed 6–1–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Executive Office for Immigration 

Review 

[OMB Number 1125–0010] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Proposed Collection; 

Comments Requested; Notice of 

Appeal to the Board of Immigration 

Appeals From a Decision of a DHS 

Officer 

AGENCY: Executive Office for 

Immigration Review, Department of 

Justice. 

ACTION: 30-Day notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Justice 

(DOJ), Executive Office for Immigration 

Review (EOIR), will be submitting the 

following information collection request 

to the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) for review and approval in 

accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995. This proposed 

information collection was previously 

published in the Federal Register on 

March 3, 2021, allowing for a 60-day 

comment period. 

DATES: Comments are encouraged and 

will be accepted for an additional 30 

days until July 2, 2021. 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
29596 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 104 / Wednesday, June 2, 2021 / Notices 

ADDRESSES: Written comments and 

recommendations for the proposed 

information collection should be sent 

within 30 days of publication of this 

notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/ 

PRAMain. Find this particular 

information collection by selecting 

‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open 

for Public Comments’’ or by using the 

search function. 

If you need a copy of the proposed 

information collection or additional 

information, please contact Lauren 

Alder Reid, Assistant Director, Office of 

Policy, Executive Office for Immigration 

Review, 5107 Leesburg Pike, Suite 2500, 

Falls Church, VA 22041, telephone: 

(703) 305–0289. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written 

comments and suggestions from the 

public and affected agencies concerning 

the proposed collection of information 

are encouraged. Your comments should 

address one or more of the following 

four points: 

—Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the Bureau of Justice 

Statistics, including whether the 

information will have practical utility; 

—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s 

estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

—Evaluate whether and if so how the 

quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information to be collected can be 

enhanced; and 

—Minimize the burden of the collection 

of information on those who are to 

respond, including through the use of 

appropriate automated, electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms 

of information technology, e.g., 

permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Overview of This Information 

Collection 

1. Type of Information Collection: 

Revision and extension of a currently 

approved collection. 

2. The Title of the Form/Collection: 

Notice of Appeal to the Board of 

Immigration Appeals from a Decision of 

a DHS Officer. 

3. The agency form number: EOIR–29 

(OMB 1125–0010). 

4. Affected public who will be asked 

or required to respond, as well as a brief 

abstract: 

Primary: A party who appeals a 

decision of a DHS Officer to the Board 

of Immigration Appeals (Board). 

Other: None. 

Abstract: A party affected by a 

decision of a DHS Officer may appeal 

that decision to the Board, provided that 

the Board has jurisdiction pursuant to 8 

CFR 1003.1(b). The party must complete 

the Form EOIR–29 and submit it to the 

DHS office having administrative 

control over the record of proceeding in 

order to exercise its regulatory right to 

appeal. 

5. An estimate of the total number of 

respondents and the amount of time 

estimated for an average respondent to 

respond: It is estimated that 1,664 

respondents complete the form annually 

with an average of 30 minutes per 

response for completion. 

6. An estimate of the total public 

burden (in hours) associated with the 

collection: 832 annual burden hours. 

If additional information is required 

contact: Melody Braswell, Department 

Clearance Officer, United States 

Department of Justice, Justice 

Management Division, Policy and 

Planning Staff, Two Constitution 

Square, 145 N Street NE, 3E.405B, 

Washington, DC 20530. 

Dated: May 26, 2021. 

Melody D. Braswell, 

Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S. 

Department of Justice. 

[FR Doc. 2021–11527 Filed 6–1–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–30–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Proposed 

Consent Decree Under the Clean Air 

Act 

On May 25, 2021, the Department of 

Justice lodged a proposed Consent 

Decree (‘‘Consent Decree’’) with the 

United States District Court for the 

District of Connecticut in a lawsuit 

entitled United States v. The 

Metropolitan District, Civil Action No. 

3:21–cv–0715. 

In its Complaint, the United States, on 

behalf of the U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency (‘‘EPA’’), alleges that 

The Metropolitan District violated the 

Clean Air Act (the ‘‘CAA’’ or ‘‘Act’’), 42 

U.S.C. 7413, by violating the 

requirements for Standards of 

Performance for New Sewage Sludge 

Incineration Units, 40 CFR part 60, 

subpart LLLL. Those alleged violations 

include failing to submit required 

control and monitoring plans, conduct 

annual performance tests that comply 

with the CAA regulations, and achieve 

continuous compliance with operating 

parameter limits and air pollution 

emission limits from its sewage sludge 

incineration (‘‘SSI’’) units. The 

proposed Consent Decree in this case 

requires payment of a civil penalty of 

$298,000, and injunctive relief 

including: (a) Notification of a test plan, 

conducting a performance test, and 

submitting a test report related to the 

SSI units; (b) setting and meeting sitespecific operating limits; (c) meeting 

emission limits and standards, and 

demonstrating initial and ongoing 

compliance with those limits and 

standards; (d) submitting an initial 

compliance report; (e) conducting 

annual testing; (f) submitting an annual 

compliance report; (g) submitting 

progress reports and semi-annual 

deviation reports; (j) conducting initial 

and annual air control device 

inspections and performing related 

repairs; (k) meeting annual operator 

training requirements; and, (l) installing 

a carbon monoxide emissions 

monitoring system and demonstrating 

compliance with carbon monoxide 

emission limits. 

The publication of this notice opens 

a period for public comment on the 

proposed Consent Decree. Comments 

should be addressed to the Assistant 

Attorney General, Environment and 

Natural Resources Division, and should 

refer to United States v. The 

Metropolitan District, D.J. Ref. No. 90– 

5–2–1–12047. All comments must be 

submitted no later than thirty (30) days 

after the publication date of this notice. 

Comments may be submitted either by 

email or by mail: 

To submit 

comments: Send them to: 

By email ....... pubcomment-ees.enrd@

usdoj.gov. 

By mail ......... Assistant Attorney General, 

U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. 

Box 7611, Washington, DC 

20044–7611. 

During the public comment period, 

the proposed Consent Decree may be 

examined and downloaded at this 

Justice Department website: https://

www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees. 

We will provide a paper copy of the 

proposed Consent Decree upon written 

request and payment of reproduction 

costs. Please mail your request and 

payment to: Consent Decree Library, 

U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, 

Washington, DC 20044–7611. 

Please enclose a check or money order 

for $10.00 (25 cents per page 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES