alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.13

Ocean Power                                                                 Memo

Date: 15 November, 2000

To:   Olga Johnson

From: JP Maceda

Re.   Draft MOU/EEM

Dear Olga,

This note is to confirm our  understanding  that Ocean Power and EEM will expand
their   cooperation   beyond  the   initially   agreed  upon  area  of  seawater
desalination.

Ocean Power will now work with EEM to develop a more  broadly  based  program to
exploit a wider  range of  applications  for EEM's  technologies  in the general
areas of water and gas monitoring.

The  intent of this MOU is to  develop a business  plan for the  application  of
EEM's  technologies  to a wide range of markets.  Ocean Power will assist in the
development  of this plan and will  participate  in the resultant  business in a
mutually agreeable manner.

Ocean Power will disclose this to the public in the following manner:

"Ocean  Power has signed an MOU with EEM to develop a broader  range of uses for
EEM's real-time gas anal water analysis technologies. These technologies are now
being applied to a wide range of applications for both environmental  monitoring
and  process   control.   This  will  support  Ocean  Power's  efforts  in  both
desalination and power generation."

If this is acceptable, please acknowledge your acceptance below.

Sincerely,

By: /s/ JP Maceda,
------------------
        JP Maceda
        President

Accepted by: /s/ Olga Johnson
-----------------------------
                 Olga Johnson


<PAGE>
#### Maxie Clinton JOHNSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 241-93.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.

May 12, 1993.

*575Charles Freeman, Houston, for appellant.

John B. Holmes, Jr., Dist. Atty., and Rikke Burke and Craig Goodhart, Asst. Dist. Attys., Houston, Robert Huttash, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

PER CURIAM.

A jury convicted appellant of delivery of a controlled substance and assessed punishment at confinement for six years, probated. The conviction was affirmed. *Johnson v. State,*846 S.W.2d 373 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th], 1992). Appellant has filed a petition for discretionary review contending, inter alia, that the Court of Appeals erred in not considering all of the evidence in assaying the harm attendant to the introduction of evidence seized as a result of an illegal search. We agree.

The Court of Appeals held that the search was illegal and that certain evidence, consisting of crack cocaine, a ten dollar bill used to purchase the cocaine and some weapons, should not have been admitted for that reason. However, the court went on to hold that the admission was harmless after stating, “In this case, we must determine whether the jury found the appellant guilty because of evidence that a shotgun, pistol and cocaine were found at the scene of the arrest.” *Id.*at 378. Since the testimony concerning the weapons and seized cocaine was not tied to the delivery but only to the arrest, the court found such admission to be harmless especially since the proof of the delivery was overwhelming. However, the ten dollar bill was tied to the delivery since it was used to buy the crack cocaine and was given to the accomplice witness by the undercover narcotics officer in exchange for the cocaine. After the illegal search that ten dollar bill was found in appellant’s pocket. Consideration of the admission of the ten dollar bill should have been a part of the Court of Appeals’ analysis.

In *Esteves v. State,*849 S.W.2d 822 (Tex.Cr.App.1993), we held that when a court of appeals fails to consider all of the evidence relating to an appellant’s challenge the cause will be remanded to that court for consideration of all of the relevant evidence. In the instant case the Court of Appeals did not mention the ten dollar bill in its analysis when such may well have made a difference. In such a situation the cause will be remanded to that court to allow it to analyze the harm flowing from the erroneous admission of all of the evidence which was relevant to appellant’s challenge which was seized and admitted before the jury, if there be any such harm. *Esteves,*supra.

Therefore, appellant’s petition for discretionary review is granted as to grounds for review number one through three, complaining of an incomplete harm analysis and the cause remanded for a more complete analysis as set out herein. All other grounds for review are refused.
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-3
No. 333-134936) of our report dated February 28, 2008, except Note 21 as to which the date is August 11, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Station Casinos, Inc. and its subsidiaries and of our report dated February 28, 2008 on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Station
Casinos, Inc. and its subsidiaries, included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended December 31, 2007.



Las
Vegas, Nevada
August 11, 2008

---



QuickLinks
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Daniel ADAMSON, Appellant.

No. WD 47312.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Nov. 16, 1993.

Richard E. McFadin, McFadin and McFadin, Kansas City, for appellant.

Michael D. Arnold, Pros. Atty., Daviess County, Gallatin, for respondent.

Before BERREY, P.J. and BRECKENRIDGE and SMART, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from a conviction of assault in the third degree, § 565.070, RSMo 1986.

Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
#### Elizabeth BURGDORF, Appellant, v. The RELIABLE LIFE INSURANCE CO., Respondent.

No. 66850.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

June 6, 1995.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 27, 1995.

Application to Transfer Denied Sept. 19, 1995.

Heidi L. Leopold, Martin & Malee, St. Louis, for appellant,

Robert A. Wulff and William J. Magrath, Amelung, Wulff & Willenbrock, St. Louis, for respondent,

Before AHRENS, P.J., and GRIMM, C.J., and KAROHL, J.

*317*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

In this action to recover accidental injury benefits under an insurance policy, plaintiff Elizabeth Burgdorf appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant, The Reliable Life Insurance Company.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 10.2



ASAT Holdings Limited

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)



Pursuant to the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. Sections 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certify as follows:



|1. |  | I, Harry R. Rozakis, the Chief Executive Officer of ASAT Holdings Limited (the Company).
|-- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. |  | To the best of my knowledge:
|-- |  | ----------------------------



| | (A) |  | The Companys annual reports on Form 20-F for year ended April 30, 2003 accompanying this Certification, in the form filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (B) |  | The information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: July 28, 2003



/s/    HARRY
ROZAKISName:

Harry RozakisTitle:

Chief Executive Officer




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The certification set forth above is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and should not be deemed to be filed under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by the Company or the certifying officers.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION FOR R EHEARING

Appellate case name: Ezy

- Lift of California, Inc. and Eagle Electronics, Inc. v. EZY

Acquisition, LLC d/b/a EZY Lift

Appellate case number: 01

- 13

- 00058

- CV

Trial court case number: 2010

- 70596

Trial court: 270th District Court of Harris County

It is ordered that Appellants’ Motion for Rehearing is denied

.

Justice’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Justice s Jennings, Brown, and Huddle

Date: August 2 6 , 2014
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 24.01

                                THE 3DO COMPANY
                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

    KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears
below constitute and appoints James Alan Cook, as such person's lawful
attorneys-in-fact for him, each with full power of substitution, for such
person, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to The 3DO
Company's Report on Form-10K for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2000, and to
file the same, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and
confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact or their substitutes or substitutes
may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

    Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant in
the capacities and on the dates indicated:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                  SIGNATURE                                     TITLE                       DATE
                  ---------                                     -----                       ----
<C>                                            <S>                                      <C>
         /s/ WILLIAM M. HAWKINS, III           Chairman of the Board of Directors and
    ------------------------------------         Chief Executive Officer (Principal     June 29, 2000
           William M. Hawkins, III               Executive Officer)

             /s/ WILLIAM A. HALL
    ------------------------------------       Director                                 June 29, 2000
               William A. Hall

             /s/ HUGH C. MARTIN
    ------------------------------------       Director                                 June 29, 2000
               Hugh C. Martin

          /s/ H. WILLIAM JESSE, JR.
    ------------------------------------       Director                                 June 29, 2000
            H. William Jesse, Jr.
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Dimeco, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
year ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, we, Gary C. Beilman, Chief Executive Officer, and Maureen H. Beilman, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Gary C. Beilman     |  | /s/ Maureen H. Beilman 
|Gary C. Beilman         |  | Maureen H. Beilman     
|Chief Executive Officer |  | Chief Financial Officer

Date: March 23, 2009
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 77 (Friday, April 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19882-19883]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9825]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Opportunity to Comment on the Applicants for the Fremont (NB) and 
Titus (IN) Areas

AGENCY: Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration 
(GIPSA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: GIPSA requests comments on the applicants for designation to 
provide official services in the geographic areas currently assigned to 
Fremont Grain Inspection Department, Inc. (Fremont), and Titus Grain 
Inspection, Inc. (Titus).

DATES: Comments must be postmarked, or sent by telecopier (FAX) or 
electronic mail by May 30, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Comments must be submitted in writing to Janet M. Hart, 
Chief, Review Branch, Compliance Division, GIPSA, USDA, Room 1647 South 
Building, P.O. Box 96454, Washington, DC 20090-6454. SprintMail users 
may respond to [A:ATTMAIL,O:USDA,ID:A36JHART]. ATTMAIL and FTS2000MAIL 
users may respond to !A36JHART. Telecopier (FAX) users may send 
comments to the automatic telecopier machine at 202-720-1015, 
attention: Janet M. Hart. All comments received will be made available 
for public inspection at the above address located at 1400 Independence 
Avenue, S.W., during regular business hours.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Janet M. Hart, telephone 202-720-8525.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This action has been reviewed and determined 
not to be a rule or regulation as defined in Executive Order 12866 and 
Departmental Regulation 1512-1; therefore, the Executive Order and 
Departmental Regulation do not apply to this action.
    In the March 1, 1995, Federal Register (60 FR 11069), GIPSA asked 
persons interested in providing official services in the geographic 
areas assigned to Fremont, and Titus to submit an application for 
designation. Fremont and Titus, the only applicants, each applied for 
designation to provide official inspection services in the entire area 
currently assigned to them.
    GIPSA is publishing this notice to provide interested persons the 
opportunity to present comments concerning the applicants. Commenters 
are encouraged to submit reasons and pertinent data for support or 
objection to the designation of these applicants. All comments must be 
submitted to the Compliance Division at the above address. Comments and 
other available information will be considered in making a final 
decision. GIPSA will publish notice of the final decision in 
[[Page 19883]] the Federal Register, and GIPSA will send the applicants 
written notification of the decision.

    Authority: Pub. L. 94-582, 90 Stat. 2867, as amended (7 U.S.C. 
71 et seq.).

    Dated: April 13, 1995.
Neil E. Porter,
Director, Compliance Division.
[FR Doc. 95-9825 Filed 4-20-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-EN-F
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SS. 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-KSB of Markland Technologies,
Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, to their best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/S/ ROBERT TARINI                            /S/ KENNETH P. DUCEY, JR.
----------------------------                 ----------------------------
ROBERT TARINI                                KENNETH P. DUCEY, JR.
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER                      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

DATE:  MAY 21, 2004                          DATE:  MAY 21, 2004
#### Clarice SEKO, Appellant, v. McDONNELL DOUGLAS CORPORATION, Respondent.

No. 66513.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

June 20, 1995.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 24, 1995.

D. Eric Sowers, St. Louis, for appellant.

Gerard T. Carmody, Vivian H. Waters, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before CRANE, P.J., and CRANDALL and DOWD, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, Clarice Seko, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, in a bench tried case, in favor of defendant, McDonnell Douglas Corporation, in plaintiffs action for sexual harassment.

The judgment of the trial court is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          30,402
<SECURITIES>                                    12,574
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,081
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,633
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         745,351
<DEPRECIATION>                                 136,989
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,114,456
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          103,835
<BONDS>                                        669,397
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            28
<OTHER-SE>                                     250,418
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,114,456
<SALES>                                        161,425
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               161,425
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                69,703
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              54,131
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 37,591
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             33,091
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (5,428)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    27,663
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .71



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Stephen Williams, the Chief Executive Officer of Power Air Corporation, and Donald M. Prest, the Chief Financial Officer of Power Air Corporation, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report on Form 10-QSB of Power Air Corporation, for the period from December 31, 2005 to March 31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Power Air Corporation.

Date:   May 15, 2006

| | /s/"Stephen Williams"
__________________________________                                        
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Stephen Williams 
President, Chief Executive Officer, Principal Executive Officer and a director
| | /s/"Donald M. Prest"
__________________________________                                         
| | Donald M. Prest
Secretary, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer  

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Power Air Corporation and will be retained by Power Air Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### James K. BETTS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 41660.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

July 25, 1989.

Joseph H. Locascio, Sp. Public Defender, Daniel C. Miller, Asst. Sp. Public Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Elizabeth L. Ziegler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before GAITAN, P.J., and MANFORD and ULRICH, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from denial of Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Accentia Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) for the three months ended December 31, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Francis E. ODonnell, Jr., Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended: and



(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: February 14, 2006



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Francis E. ODonnell, Jr.                    
|Francis E. ODonnell, Jr.,                       
|Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer



This certification accompanies the
Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Accentia Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.



35