alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7570

SGRE, Inc:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_03.20.19.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Andre PASLEY, Appellant.

No. WD 48502.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

July 5, 1994.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Aug. 30, 1994.

Cyril M. Hendricks, Jefferson City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before LOWENSTEIN, P.J., and BERREY and SPINDEN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from jury conviction for tampering in the first degree, § 569.080 RSMo 1986, and sentence of four years imprisonment.

Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 7, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-51050

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

VALENTIN HERNANDEZ-FAVELA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas 

USDC No. 3:06-CR-290-ALL

--------------------

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Valentin

Hernandez-Favela raises arguments that are foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998),

which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and

not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for

summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose Ramos, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Nicolai, J.), rendered April 27, 1989, convicting him of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Brown, Rubin, Balletta and Miller, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5640 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.5640

                     One Hundred Eighteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
         the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-four

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
12804 Chillicothe Road in Chesterland, Ohio, as the ``Sgt. Wolfgang Kyle 
                    Weninger Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SGT. WOLFGANG KYLE WENINGER POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 12804 Chillicothe Road in Chesterland, Ohio, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Sgt. Wolfgang Kyle Weninger Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sgt. 
Wolfgang Kyle Weninger Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### Robert KELLEY and Jean Kelley Plaintiffs/Respondents, v. CITY OF O’FALLON, Missouri, Defendant, Robert G. Sitze, Jr., and Shirley J. Sitze, Intervenor/Appellant.

No. 65522.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

Dec. 13, 1994.

Leslie B. Yoffie, St. Charles, for appellant.

Rex M. Burlison, O’Fallon, for respondent.

Before AHRENS, P.J., and SIMON and KAROHL, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellants appeal from the trial court’s order denying their motions to intervene and vacate judgment.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 10.3



 Exhibit 10.3 

 

			
	



	  	
	  	                            FTI
Consulting
		  	                            Phillips
Point West Tower, Suite 1500
		  	                            777 South
Flagler Drive
		  	                            
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
		  	                    main 561.515.1900
	
	Personal and Confidential
		
		  	                            
www.fticonsulting.com

  
  

March 23, 2010 
 Mr. Eric B.
Miller 
 4325 Wickford Road 

Baltimore, MD 21210 
 Dear Eric: 

We are delighted to extend to you the following amended offer for employment at FTI Consulting, Inc. (the “Company”). The terms of your
employment will be as follows: 
 Position - Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Chief Ethics Officer. 

Base Salary - $750,000 per year as of April 1, 2010. 

Bonus Opportunity - You will participate in the Section 162(m) bonus program for senior executive officers, with bonus opportunities set
annually upon achievement of corporate and individual goals. You will also participate in other bonus programs offered generally to senior executives. 

Restricted Stock - A grant of 10,000 shares of common stock on the date you sign and return this amended offer of employment, vesting ratably over
three years. Other terms and conditions of the restricted stock awards will be substantially similar to those granted to the Company’s other senior executive officers. 

Severance Protection - In the event that you are terminated without Cause or terminate your employment for Good Reason, you will be entitled to a
cash payment of (i) your then current base salary plus (ii) $700,0000 (the “Severance Payment”). For this purpose, Cause, Good Reason and Change in Control are defined as provided in the Company’s employment agreements with
its Chief Executive Officer, except that Change in Control shall not constitute Good Reason, and except to the extent Good Reason is modified by the “Location” provision set forth below. In addition, in the event you become entitled to
receive the Severance Payment or there is a Change in Control, at that time all of the grants of equity described in this agreement shall vest immediately to the extent such grants of equity have not otherwise fully vested. 

Benefits - You will be eligible for standard employee benefits. 

Location - Baltimore, MD. In the event you are required to move to any location outside the Baltimore-Washington, D.C. metro area, you will be
entitled to terminate your employment for Good Reason. 
 Employment at Will- You will be an employee-at-will. 







 Mr. Eric B. Miller 

March 23, 2010 
 Page 2 

We are very enthusiastic about your continued employment. In the position of Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Chief Ethics Officer, you will
report directly to Jack Dunn (CEO), and will have a seat on the Executive Committee, and will be responsible for oversight of our legal activities. 
  

	
	Yours truly,
	
	 /S/ JACK B. DUNN, IV

	Jack Dunn

  

					
	Accepted and Agreed:	 		 	
			
	 /S/ ERIC B. MILLER
	 		 	 3/23/10

	Eric B. Miller	 		 	Date
Exhibit 32.1
Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTS OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Liska Biometry, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Chris LeClerc, as
Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Manoj Hippola, as Financial Officer
of the Company, each hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Chris LeClerc
Chris LeClerc, CEO
April 19, 2005

/s/ Manoj Hippola
Manoj Hippola, CFO
April 19, 2005

      This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FSP Galleria North Corp.
(the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned,
George J. Carter, President and principal executive officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date: August 10, 2007                    /s/ George J. Carter
                                         -----------------------------
                                         George J. Carter
                                         President
                                         (Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT
32.1.




Certification
of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








Anthony
Brandon Escobar, Chief Executive Officer, and Anthony Coletti, Principal
Accounting Officer, of Trafalgar Resources, Inc. (the "Registrant") do hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge, based
upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period December 31,
2008 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"):





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.





Dated:  February
17,
2009                                                                                     By:  /s/ Anthony Brandon
Escobar


Anthony
Brandon Escobar


Chief Executive Officer





By:  /s/
Anthony Coletti




Principal Accounting Officer





* A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Trafalgar Resources, Inc. and will be retained by Trafalgar
Resources, Inc. and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 75 (Wednesday, April 19, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 19561]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9630]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 95-45, RM-8605]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Pahrump, NV

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission requests comments on a petition filed by 
Gregory P. Wells seeking the allotment of Channel 236A to Pahrump, NV, 
as the community's second local FM service. Channel 236A can be 
allotted to Pahrump in compliance with the Commission's minimum 
distance separation requirements with a site restriction of 4.1 
kilometers (2.5 miles) west, at coordinates 36-13-12 North Latitude and 
116-01-43 West Longitude, to avoid a short-spacing to Station KWNR, 
Channel 238C, Henderson, NV.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before June 5, 1995, and reply 
comments on or before June 20, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, D.C. 20554. 
In addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should 
serve the petitioner, or its counsel or consultant, as follows: Gregory 
P. Wells, P.O. Box 590, Suite 145, Pahrump, NV 89041 (Petitioner).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Leslie K. Shapiro, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 95-45, adopted April 6, 
1995, and released April 14, 1995. The full text of this Commission 
decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business 
hours in the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW, 
Washington, D.C. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International 
Transcription Services, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 2100 M Street, NW, Suite 
140, Washington, D.C. 20037.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 95-9630 Filed 4-18-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          36,323
<SECURITIES>                                    10,717
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,692
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,012
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         623,303
<DEPRECIATION>                                 103,539
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 881,419
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           90,912
<BONDS>                                        503,671
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                            17
<OTHER-SE>                                     273,364
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   881,419
<SALES>                                        109,092
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               109,092
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                48,353
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,826
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 30,913
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             25,413
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    25,413
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .88



</TABLE>
a6289313ex10-1.htm


Exhibit 10.1        







Valpey-Fisher Corporation Key Employee Bonus Plan For


Fiscal Year 2010







Purpose of Plan


To provide an incentive to those employees who have a major impact on the success, growth and profitability of the company.







Eligibility


Must be a full time employee and be in continued employment of the Company for the entire fiscal year, unless a waiver of this provision is approved in advance of hiring by the Compensation Committee. In the event the Company is sold before the end of the year, the bonuses earned through the sale date would be prorated.







Participants


The plan participants will include the CEO and the Management Staff.







Bonus Pool


The 2010 bonus pool is based on achieving certain adjusted operating profit amounts listed below.  Adjusted operating profit is defined as operating profit before the bonus amount and excluding the effects of SFAS 123R and other income or expense amounts determined by the Compensation Committee.








	 	
Adjusted Operating Profit

	  	
Cumulative Bonus Amount

	 
	 	  	  	  	 
	 	
   224,000

	  	
100,000

	 
	 	
   500,000

	  	
150,000

	 
	 	
   750,000

	  	
200,000

	 
	 	
1,000,000

	  	
275,000

	 
	 	
1,250,000

	  	
325,000

	 
	 	
1,500,000

	  	
375,000

	 
	 	
1,750,000


2,000,000

	  	
425,000


475,000

	 
	 	
2,500,000

	  	
575,000

	 










 For adjusted operating profit amounts between the listed amounts, the bonus amount will be prorated.







For adjusted operating profit in excess of $2,500,000 the Board of Directors will determine the bonus amount.







The bonus amount may include a profit sharing contribution for the year ended December 31, 2010 as determined by the Board of Directors and would be limited to a maximum of 10% of the total bonus payout.







Bonus Payout


Each plan participant will have up to four individual objectives based on their particular area of responsibilities.  An individual objective can make up to 50% of the individual’s bonus.  The CEO will decide the weights of the individual objective as part of the total payout.   In the case of the CEO the Compensation Committee will decide.







A plan participant’s bonus amount will range from 0% to 100% of base salary.







The Compensation Committee will recommend the bonus payout amount for the CEO to the Board of Directors for its approval. The CEO will recommend the distribution payout for the remaining participants, which will then be reviewed by the Compensation Committee before making recommendations to the Board of Directors for its approval.


 


 


- 15 -
EXHIBIT 32.1


                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      The following certification accompanies the issuer's Annual Report on
           Form 10-K and is not filed, as provided in Release 33-8212.
                         34-47551 dated March 21, 2003.


<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1


                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In  connection  with the  accompanying  Annual  Report on Form 10-K of North Bay
Bancorp for the year ended  December 31, 2003, I, Terry L.  Robinson,  President
and Chief Executive Officer of North Bay Bancorp,  hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2003 that:

(1) such  Annual  Report on Form 10-K of North Bay  Bancorp  for the year  ended
December 31, 2003,  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in such Annual  Report on Form 10-K of North Bay
Bancorp for the year ended December 31, 2003,  fairly presents,  in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of North Bay
Bancorp.


Dated:  March 25, 2004

                                        /s/ Terry L. Robinson
                                        --------------------------------
                                        TERRY L. ROBINSON
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
                                        (Principal Executive Officer)