29522 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 104 / Wednesday, June 2, 2021 / Rules and Regulations 

tribal implications and will not impose 

substantial direct costs on tribal 

governments or preempt tribal law as 

specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 

FR 67249, November 9, 2000). 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean 

Air Act, petitions for judicial review of 

this action must be filed in the United 

States Court of Appeals for the 

appropriate circuit by August 2, 2021. 

Filing a petition for reconsideration by 

the Administrator of this final rule does 

not affect the finality of this action for 

the purposes of judicial review nor does 

it extend the time within which a 

petition for judicial review may be filed, 

and shall not postpone the effectiveness 

of such rule or action. This action may 

not be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 

Incorporation by reference, 

Intergovernmental relations, Lead, 

Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate 

matter, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

Dated: May 24, 2021. 

Deborah Szaro, 

Acting Regional Administrator, EPA Region 

1. 

Part 52 of chapter I, title 40 of the 

Code of Federal Regulations is amended 

as follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart U—Maine 

■ 2. In § 52.1020(c), amend the table by 

revising the entry ‘‘Chapter 119’’; and by 

adding new State citation for ‘‘38 M.R.S. 

§ 585–N as amended by Public Law 

2019, c. 55, § 1’’ at the end of the table 

to read as follows: 

§ 52.1020 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

EPA-APPROVED MAINE REGULATIONS

State citation Title/subject State effective date EPA approval date 

and citation 1 Explanations 

*******

Chapter 119 ............... Motor Vehicle Fuel 

Volatility Limit.

July 15, 2015 ............. June 2, 2021 [Insert 

Federal Register 

citation].

Removes references from the SIP for the requirement to sell reformulated gasoline in 

York, Cumberland, Sagadahoc, 

Androscoggin, Kennebec, Knox and Lincoln counties. 

* * * * * * * 

38 M.R.S. § 585–N as 

amended by Public 

Law 2019, c. 55, § 1.

Reformulated gasoline November 1, 2020 ..... June 2, 2021 [Insert 

Federal Register 

citation].

Repeals the section of the statute which requires retailers in York, Cumberland, 

Sagadahoc, Androscoggin, Kennebec, 

Knox and Lincoln counties in Maine to 

only sell reformulated gasoline. 

[FR Doc. 2021–11320 Filed 6–1–21; 8:45 a.m.] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 81 

[EPA–R09–OAR–2021–0148; FRL–10024– 

30–Region 9] 

Designation of Areas for Air Quality 

Planning Purposes; California; San 

Diego County Ozone Nonattainment 

Area; Reclassification to Severe 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: Under the Clean Air Act 

(CAA or ‘‘Act’’), the Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final 

action to approve a request from the 

State of California to reclassify the San 

Diego County ozone nonattainment area 

from ‘‘Serious’’ to ‘‘Severe’’ for the 2008 

ozone National Ambient Air Quality 

Standards (NAAQS) and from 

‘‘Moderate’’ to ‘‘Severe’’ for the 2015 

ozone NAAQS. The EPA is also 

finalizing our action to reclassify in the 

same manner as state land, reservation 

areas of Indian country and any other 

area of Indian country within it where 

the EPA or a tribe has demonstrated that 

the tribe has jurisdiction located within 

the boundaries of the San Diego County 

ozone nonattainment area. The new 

applicable attainment dates for the San 

Diego County ozone nonattainment area 

are as expeditious as practicable but no 

later than July 20, 2027, for the 2008 

ozone NAAQS, and August 3, 2033, for 

the 2015 ozone NAAQS. With respect to 

Severe state implementation plan (SIP) 

element submittal dates that have 

passed, the EPA is approving a deadline 

of no later than 12 months from the 

effective date of this rule for submittal 

of revisions to the San Diego County 

portion of the California SIP to meet 

additional requirements for Severe 

ozone nonattainment areas to the extent 

that such revisions have not already 

been submitted. 

DATES: This rule is effective on July 2, 

2021. 

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket ID 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 104 / Wednesday, June 2, 2021 / Rules and Regulations 29523 

1Throughout this document and in our proposed 

rule, we use the term ‘‘Severe’’ to refer to Severe 

areas that have up to 15 years to attain the ozone 

standards. The ozone area designation tables in 40 

CFR part 81 specify ‘‘Severe-15’’ to distinguish such 

areas from ‘‘Severe-17’’ areas, which are Severe 

areas that have up to 17 years to attain the ozone 

standards. 

2 86 FR 18227 (April 8, 2021). 

3The EPA promulgated the SRR for the 2008 and 

2015 ozone NAAQS at 40 CFR part 52, subpart AA 

and subpart CC, respectively. 

4 86 FR 18227, 18229. 

5The tribes are identified in 40 CFR 81.305 and 

86 FR 18227, 18229: Barona Group of Capitan 

Grande of Mission Indians of the Barona 

Reservation, Campo Band of Diegueno Mission 

Indians of the Campo Indian Reservation, Capitan 

Grande Band of Diegueno Mission Indians of 

California, Ewiiaapaayp Band of Kumeyaay Indians, 

Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel, Inaja Band of 

Diegueno Mission Indians of the Inaja and Cosmit 

Reservation, Jamul Indian Village of California, La 

Jolla Band of Luiseno Indians, La Posta Band of 

Diegueno Mission Indians of the La Posta Indian 

Reservation, Los Coyotes Band of Cahuilla and 

Cupeno Indians, Manzanita Band of Diegueno 

Mission Indians of the Manzanita Reservation, Mesa 

Grande Band of Diegueno Mission Indians of the 

Mesa Grande Reservation, Pala Band of Mission 

Indians, Pauma Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of 

the Pauma and Yuima Reservation, Rincon Band of 

Luiseno Mission Indians of the Rincon Reservation, 

San Pasqual Band of Diegueno Mission Indians of 

California, Sycuan Band of the Kumeyaay Nation, 

and Viejas (Baron Long) Group of Capitan Grande 

Band of Mission Indians of the Viejas Reservation. 

No. EPA–R09–OAR–2021–0148. All 

documents in the docket are listed on 

the https://www.regulations.gov 

website. Although listed in the index, 

some information is not publicly 

available, e.g., Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, is not placed on 

the internet and will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available through https://

www.regulations.gov, or please contact 

the person identified in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section for 

additional availability information. If 

you need assistance in a language other 

than English or if you are a person with 

disabilities who needs a reasonable 

accommodation at no cost to you, please 

contact the person identified in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: T. 

Khoi Nguyen, Air Planning Office (AIR– 

2), EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, 

San Francisco, CA 94105, (415) 947– 

4120, or by email at nguyen.thien@

epa.gov. 

Table of Contents 

I. Summary of the Proposed Action 

II. Public Comments and EPA Responses 

III. Final Action 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. Summary of the Proposed Action 

On April 8, 2021, the EPA proposed 

to grant a request by the California Air 

Resources Board (CARB) to voluntarily 

reclassify the San Diego County 

nonattainment area from Serious to 

Severe 1 for the 2008 ozone NAAQS and 

from Moderate to Severe for the 2015 

ozone NAAQS.2

With respect to Severe SIP element 

submittal dates that have passed, the 

EPA also proposed to establish a 

deadline of no later than 12 months 

from the effective date of reclassification 

for submittal of revisions to the San 

Diego County portion of the California 

SIP to meet additional requirements for 

Severe ozone nonattainment areas to the 

extent that such revisions have not 

already been submitted. With respect to 

the section 185 fee program, upon 

reclassification to Severe, we indicated 

that the deadline for submittal would be 

July 20, 2022, for the 2008 ozone 

NAAQS and August 3, 2028, for the 

2015 ozone NAAQS pursuant to the 

EPA’s SIP Requirements Rules (SRR) for 

the 2008 and 2015 ozone NAAQS.3

Upon reclassification, we noted that the 

new attainment dates for the San Diego 

County ozone nonattainment area 

would be as expeditiously as 

practicable, but no later than July 20, 

2027, for the 2008 ozone NAAQS and 

August 3, 2033, for the 2015 ozone 

NAAQS. Further, as indicated in our 

proposed notice, the reformulated 

gasoline requirement will continue to 

apply within San Diego County upon 

reclassification to Severe.4

In addition, the EPA also proposed to 

reclassify reservation areas of Indian 

country and any other area of Indian 

country where the EPA or a tribe has 

demonstrated that the tribe has 

jurisdiction within the San Diego 

County nonattainment area as Severe 

nonattainment for the 2008 and 2015 

ozone NAAQS.5 Although eligible tribes 

may seek the EPA’s approval of relevant 

tribal programs under the CAA, we 

noted that none of the affected tribes 

would be required to submit an 

implementation plan as a result of this 

reclassification. 

Please see our April 8, 2021 proposed 

rule for additional background and a 

more detailed explanation of our 

proposed action. 

II. Public Comments and EPA 

Responses 

The public comment period on the 

proposed rule opened on April 8, 2021, 

the date of its publication in the Federal 

Register, and closed on May 10, 2021. 

During this period, the EPA did not 

receive any comments on our proposed 

action. 

III. Final Action 

For the reasons discussed in detail in 

the proposed rule and summarized 

herein, the EPA is approving the request 

by CARB to reclassify the San Diego 

County ozone nonattainment area to 

Severe for the 2008 and 2015 ozone 

NAAQS. The EPA is also reclassifying 

reservation areas of Indian country, and 

any other area of Indian country within 

it where the EPA or a tribe has 

demonstrated that the tribe has 

jurisdiction, located within the 

boundaries of the San Diego County 

ozone nonattainment area consistent 

with the reclassification of state lands 

(i.e., to Severe). Lastly, the EPA is 

setting a deadline for submittal of SIP 

revisions to address the Severe area 

requirements for San Diego County, to 

the extent that such revisions have not 

already been submitted, of no later than 

one year from the effective date of this 

rule. 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 

51735, October 4, 1993), this final action 

is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ 

and therefore is not subject to Executive 

Order 12866. With respect to lands 

under state jurisdiction, voluntary 

reclassifications under CAA section 

181(b)(3) of the CAA are based solely 

upon requests by the state, and the EPA 

is required under the CAA to grant 

them. These actions do not, in and of 

themselves, impose any new 

requirements on any sectors of the 

economy. In addition, because the 

statutory requirements are clearly 

defined with respect to the differently 

classified areas, and because those 

requirements are automatically triggered 

by reclassification, reclassification does 

not impose a materially adverse impact 

under Executive Order 12866. With 

respect to Indian country, 

reclassifications do not establish 

deadlines for air quality plans or plan 

revisions. For these reasons, this final 

action is also not subject to Executive 

Order 13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning 

Regulations That Significantly Affect 

Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66 

FR 28355, May 22, 2001). 

In addition, I certify that this final 

rule will not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities under the 

Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 

et seq.), and that this final rule does not 

contain any unfunded mandate or 

significantly or uniquely affect small 

governments, as described in the 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 

(Pub. L. 104–4), because the EPA is 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
29524 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 104 / Wednesday, June 2, 2021 / Rules and Regulations 

required to grant requests by states for 

voluntary reclassifications and such 

reclassifications in and of themselves do 

not impose any federal 

intergovernmental mandate, and 

because tribes are not subject to 

implementation plan submittal 

deadlines that apply to states as a result 

of reclassifications. 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000) requires the EPA to 

develop an accountable process to 

ensure ‘‘meaningful and timely input by 

tribal officials in the development of 

regulatory policies that have tribal 

implications.’’ ‘‘Policies that have tribal 

Implications’’ are defined in section 1(a) 

of the Executive Order to include 

regulations that have ‘‘substantial direct 

effects on one or more Indian tribes, on 

the relationship between the Federal 

Government and the Indian tribes, or on 

the distribution of power and 

responsibilities between the Federal 

Government and Indian tribes.’’ Several 

Indian tribes have areas of Indian 

country located within the boundary of 

the San Diego County ozone 

nonattainment areas. 

The EPA implements federal CAA 

programs, including reclassifications, in 

these areas of Indian country consistent 

with our discretionary authority under 

sections 301(a) and 301(d)(4) of the 

CAA. The EPA has concluded that this 

final rule might have tribal implications 

for the purposes of E.O. 13175 but 

would not impose substantial direct 

costs upon the tribes, nor would it 

preempt tribal law. This final rule does 

affect implementation of new source 

review for new or modified major 

stationary sources proposed to be 

located in the areas of Indian country 

that are being reclassified, and might 

affect projects proposed in these areas 

that require federal permits, approvals, 

or funding. Such projects are subject to 

the requirements of the EPA’s general 

conformity rule, and federal permits, 

approvals, or funding for the projects 

may be more difficult to obtain because 

of the lower de minimis thresholds 

triggered by reclassification. 

Given the potential implications, the 

EPA contacted tribal officials early in 

the process of developing our proposed 

rule to provide an opportunity to have 

meaningful and timely input into its 

development. On December 11, 2020, 

we sent letters to leaders of the 17 tribal 

governments representing 18 areas of 

Indian country in the nonattainment 

area offering government-to-government 

consultation and seeking input on how 

we could best communicate with the 

tribes on this rulemaking effort. On 

January 12, 2021, we received a 

response from one tribe requesting a 

webinar on this matter on behalf of a 

few tribes. We held this informational 

webinar on January 22, 2021. 

Additionally, we received responses 

from three tribes requesting formal 

government-to-government 

consultation. The consultation letters 

and the information and notes from the 

webinar and the three government-togovernment consultations are included 

in the docket for this action. The EPA 

has carefully considered the views 

expressed by the tribes. 

Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, 

February 16, 1994) establishes federal 

executive policy on environmental 

justice. Its main provision directs 

federal agencies, to the greatest extent 

practicable and permitted by law, to 

make environmental justice part of their 

mission by identifying and addressing, 

as appropriate, disproportionately high 

and adverse human health or 

environmental effects of their programs, 

policies, and activities on minority 

populations and low-income 

populations in the United States. This 

final reclassification action relates to 

ozone, a pollutant that is regional in 

nature, and is not the type of action that 

could result in the types of local 

impacts addressed in Executive Order 

12898. 

This final action also does not have 

federalism implications because it does 

not have substantial direct effects on the 

states, on the relationship between the 

national government and the states, nor 

on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government, as specified in 

Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, 

August 10, 1999). This final action does 

not alter the relationship, or the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities established in the CAA. 

This final rule also is not subject to 

Executive Order 13045, ‘‘Protection of 

Children from Environmental Health 

Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, 

April 23, 1997), because the EPA 

interprets Executive Order 13045 as 

applying only to those regulatory 

actions that concern health or safety 

risks, such that the analysis required 

under section 5–501 of the Executive 

Order has the potential to influence the 

regulation. 

Reclassification actions do not 

involve technical standards and thus, 

the requirements of section 12(d) of the 

National Technology Transfer and 

Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 

272 note) do not apply. This final rule 

does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 

(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. The EPA will 

submit a report containing this action 

and other required information to the 

U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 

Representatives, and the Comptroller 

General of the United States prior to 

publication of the rule in the Federal 

Register. A major rule cannot take effect 

until 60 days after it is published in the 

Federal Register. This action is not a 

‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 

804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean 

Air Act, petitions for judicial review of 

this action must be filed in the United 

States Court of Appeals for the 

appropriate circuit by August 2, 2021. 

Filing a petition for reconsideration by 

the Administrator of this final rule does 

not affect the finality of this action for 

the purposes of judicial review nor does 

it extend the time within which a 

petition for judicial review may be filed, 

and shall not postpone the effectiveness 

of such rule or action. This action may 

not be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 81 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Intergovernmental 

relations, National parks, Ozone, 

Wilderness areas. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Dated: May 24, 2021. 

Deborah Jordan, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX. 

For the reasons stated in the 

preamble, the EPA amends 40 CFR part 

81 as follows: 

PART 81—DESIGNATION OF AREAS 

FOR AIR QUALITY PLANNING 

PURPOSES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 81 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart C—Section 107 Attainment 

Status Designations 

■ 2. Section 81.305 is amended by 

revising the entry for ‘‘San Diego 

County, CA’’ in the table titled 

‘‘California—2008 8-Hour Ozone 

NAAQS [Primary and Secondary],’’ and 

by revising the entry for ‘‘San Diego 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 104 / Wednesday, June 2, 2021 / Rules and Regulations 29525 

County, CA’’ in the table titled 

‘‘California—2015 8-Hour Ozone 

NAAQS [Primary and Secondary]’’ to 

read as follows: 

§ 81.305 California. 

* * * * * 

CALIFORNIA—2008 8-HOUR OZONE NAAQS 

[Primary and Secondary] 

Designated area 

Designation Classification 

Date 1 Type Date 1 Type 

*******

San Diego County, CA .............................. Nonattainment .. July 2, 2021 ...... Severe-15. 

San Diego County:

Barona Group of Capitan Grande Band of Mission Indians 

of the Barona Reservation. 3

Campo Band of Diegueno Mission Indians of the Campo 

Indian Reservation. 3

Capitan Grande Band of Diegueno Mission Indians of 

California. 3

Ewiiaapaayp Band of Kumeyaay Indians. 3

Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel. 3

Inaja Band of Diegueno Mission Indians of the Inaja and 

Cosmit Reservation. 3

Jamul Indian Village of California. 3

La Jolla Band of Luiseno Indians. 3

La Posta Band of Diegueno Mission Indians of the La 

Posta Indian Reservation. 3

Los Coyotes Band of Cahuilla and Cupeno Indians. 3

Manzanita Band of Diegueno Mission Indians of the 

Manzanita Reservation. 3

Mesa Grande Band of Diegueno Mission Indians of the 

Mesa Grande Reservation. 3

Pala Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pala Reservation. 3

Pauma Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pauma 

and Yuima Reservation. 3

Rincon Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Rincon 

Reservation. 3

San Pasqual Band of Diegueno Mission Indians of California. 3

Sycuan Band of the Kumeyaay Nation. 3

Viejas (Baron Long) Group of Capitan Grande Band of 

Mission Indians. 3

* * * * * * * 

1This date is July 20, 2012, unless otherwise noted. 

2Excludes Indian country located in each area, unless otherwise noted. 

3 Includes Indian country of the tribe listed in this table located in the identified area. Information pertaining to areas of Indian country in this 

table is intended for CAA planning purposes only and is not an EPA determination of Indian country status or any Indian country boundary. EPA 

lacks the authority to establish Indian country land status, and is making no determination of Indian country boundaries, in this table. 

* * * * * 

CALIFORNIA—2015 8-HOUR OZONE NAAQS 

[Primary and Secondary] 

Designated area 1

Designation Classification 

Date 2 Type Date 2 Type 

*******

San Diego County, CA2 .............................. Nonattainment .. July 2, 2021 ...... Severe-15. 

San Diego County: 2

Barona Group of Capitan Grande Band of Mission Indians 

of the Barona Reservation. 

Campo Band of Diegueno Mission Indians of the Campo 

Indian Reservation. 

Capitan Grande Band of Diegueno Mission Indians of 

California. 

Ewiiaapaayp Band of Kumeyaay Indians. 

Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel. 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
29526 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 104 / Wednesday, June 2, 2021 / Rules and Regulations 

CALIFORNIA—2015 8-HOUR OZONE NAAQS—Continued 

[Primary and Secondary] 

Designated area 1

Designation Classification 

Date 2 Type Date 2 Type 

Inaja Band of Diegueno Mission Indians of the Inaja and 

Cosmit Reservation. 

Jamul Indian Village of California. 

La Jolla Band of Luiseno Indians. 

La Posta Band of Diegueno Mission Indians of the La 

Posta Indian Reservation. 

Los Coyotes Band of Cahuilla and Cupeno Indians. 

Manzanita Band of Diegueno Mission Indians of the 

Manzanita Reservation. 

Mesa Grande Band of Diegueno Mission Indians of the 

Mesa Grande Reservation. 

Pala Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pala Reservation. 

Pauma Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pauma 

and Yuima Reservation. 

Rincon Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Rincon 

Reservation. 

San Pasqual Band of Diegueno Mission Indians of California. 

Sycuan Band of the Kumeyaay Nation. 

Viejas (Baron Long) Group of Capitan Grande Band of 

Mission Indians. 

* * * * * * * 

1 Includes any Indian country in each county or area, unless otherwise specified. EPA is not determining the boundaries of any area of Indian 

country in this table, including any area of Indian country located in the larger designation area. The inclusion of any Indian country in the designation area is not a determination that the state has regulatory authority under the Clean Air Act for such Indian country. 2This date is August 3, 2018, unless otherwise noted. 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2021–11524 Filed 6–1–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 141 

[EPA–HQ–OW–2021–0079; FRL 10022–49– 

OW] 

Expedited Approval of Alternative Test 

Procedures for the Analysis of 

Contaminants Under the Safe Drinking 

Water Act; Analysis and Sampling 

Procedures 

Correction 

In rule document 2021–10974 

appearing on pages 28277 through 

28290 in the issue of Wednesday, May 

26, 2021, make the following correction: 

PART 141—NATIONAL PRIMARY 

DRINKING WATER REGULATIONS 

[CORRECTED] 

■ 1. On page 28285, in the table entitled 

‘‘ALTERNATIVE TESTING METHODS 

FOR CONTAMINANTS LISTED AT 40 

CFR 141.23 (k)(1)’’, in the second row 

from the bottom of the page ‘‘pH’’, in 

columns four, five and six, ‘‘4500–H + 

B’’ should read, ‘‘4500–H + B’’ 

■ 2. On page 28286, in the table entitled 

‘‘ALTERNATIVE TESTING METHODS 

FOR CONTAMINANTS LISTED AT 40 

CFR 141.24 (e)(1)’’, in the first column 

entitled ‘‘Contaminant’’, the twentyfourth line, ‘‘............ .’’ 

should read, ‘‘Alachlor.’’ 

■ 3. On page 28286, in the table entitled 

‘‘ALTERNATIVE TESTING METHODS 

FOR CONTAMINANTS LISTED AT 40 

CFR 141.24 (e)(1)’’, in the first column 

entitled ‘‘Contaminant’’, the twentyfourth line, the third row 

‘‘. . . . . . . . . . . . .’’ should read, 

‘‘525.3 24

■ 4. On page 28286, in the table entitled 

‘‘ALTERNATIVE TESTING METHODS 

FOR CONTAMINANTS LISTED AT 40 

CFR 141.24 (e)(1)’’, in the first column 

entitled ‘‘Contaminant’’, the twentyeighth row, beneath ‘‘Carbofuran’’ 

currently reads, ‘‘...... .’’ and 

should read, ‘‘Chlordane’’. 

[FR Doc. C1–2021–10974 Filed 6–1–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 0099–10–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid 

Services 

42 CFR Parts 405, 417, 422, 423, 455 

and 460 

[CMS–4190–F3] 

RIN 0938–AT97 

Medicare and Medicaid Programs; 

Contract Year 2022 Policy and 

Technical Changes to the Medicare 

Advantage Program, Medicare 

Prescription Drug Benefit Program, 

Medicaid Program, Medicare Cost Plan 

Program, and Programs of All 

Inclusive Care for the Elderly; 

Corrections 

AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & 

Medicaid Services (CMS), Department 

of Health and Human Services (HHS). 

ACTION: Final rule; correction and 

correcting amendment. 

SUMMARY: This document corrects 

technical and typographical errors in 

the final rule that appeared in the 

January 19, 2021 Federal Register titled 

‘‘Medicare and Medicaid Programs; 

Contract Year 2022 Policy and 

Technical Changes to the Medicare 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES