alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Mary Anne TUCKER, f/k/a Mary Anne Mundy, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Thomas K. MUNDY, Respondent-Appellant.

No. 58212.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

March 26, 1991.

Love, Lacks & Paule, Bryan L. Hetten-bach, St. Louis, for petitioner-respondent.

*742N. Kimasa Sindel, St. Louis, for respondent-appellant.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Father appeals from a denial of his motion to modify and decrease his child support obligation. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. *Murphy v. Carrón,*536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). An extended opinion would not have prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Richard JACOBS, Defendant/Appellant. Richard JACOBS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

Nos. 62831, 64519.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

March 8, 1994.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 7, 1994.

Application to Transfer Denied May 26, 1994.

Michael A. Gross, St. Louis, for defendant/appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Mary Moulton Bryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff/respondent.

Before GRIMM, P.J., CARL R. GAERTNER and AHRENS, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

A jury convicted defendant of felony stealing in violation of § 570.030, RSMo 1986. The court sentenced defendant to pay a fine of $1000. Defendant raises three points on direct appeal. He also raises two points concerning the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

*507The judgments are affirmed in accordance ■with Rule 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
Exhibit 32.2

Station Casinos, Inc.  Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sections 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certify as
follows:

Dated:
March 11, 2004

| |  | /s/GLENN C. CHRISTENSONGlenn C. Christenson Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and
Chief Administrative Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4191

New York Air Brake LLC:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_03.20.19.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Randy W. Best, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon a guilty plea, of two counts of driving while intoxicated as a felony. On January 4, 1989, he was sentenced to concurrent terms of 1 to 3 years on each count, and on March 15, 1989, upon the People’s motion and over defendant’s objection, the court further provided that the sentence would run consecutively to an existing sentence. Defendant argues on appeal that the court lacked the power to correct the sentence, although he acknowledges that it was understood that the current sentence would run consecutively to his previous sentence, and that, in fact, the court waived a $500 fine based in part on that understanding. We find that the court had the inherent power to correct the error *(see, People v Minaya,*54 NY2d 360, *cert denied*455 US 1024). (Appeal from judgment of Ontario County Court, Henry, Jr., J.—felony driving while intoxicated.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ.
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATIONS
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ Gary L. Whitlock
Gary L. Whitlock
President and Manager (Principal Executive Officer)
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. John Joseph CAMILLO, Appellant.

No. WD 49941.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

April 4, 1995.

*315Gary E. Brotherton, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before FENNER, C.J., P.J., and BERREY and ULRICH, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from sentences as a prior and persistent offender to two consecutive terms of ten years imprisonment, following convictions, after jury trial, of two counts of second degree arson.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 77 (Friday, April 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19965-19966]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9896]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Advisory Panel for Neuroscience; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Advisory Panel for Neuroscience (1158).
    Date and Time: May 10-11, 1995, 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, Rm 310, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: Part-Open.
    Contact Person: Dr. Laurence Stanford, Program Director, 
Developmental Neuroscience; Division of Integrative Biology 
[[Page 19966]] and Neuroscience, room 685, National Science 
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230; Telephone: (703) 
306-1423.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Minutes: May be obtained from the contact person listed above.
    Agenda: Open Session: May 11, 11 a.m. to 12 p.m., to discuss 
research trends and opportunities in Developmental Neuroscience. 
Closed Session: May 10, 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.; May 11, 1995, 9 a.m. to 11 
a.m., 12 p.m. to 5 p.m.; to Developmental Neuroscience proposals as 
part of the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b (c) (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: April 18, 1995.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-9896 Filed 4-20-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 77 (Friday, April 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19918-19919]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9902]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

UJB Financial Corp., Inc., et al.; Formations of; Acquisitions 
by; and Mergers of Bank Holding Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied for the Board's 
approval under section 3 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 
1842) and Sec.  225.14 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.14) to 
become a bank holding company or to acquire a bank or bank 
[[Page 19919]] holding company. The factors that are considered in 
acting on the applications are set forth in section 3(c) of the Act (12 
U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Each application is available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. Once the application has been accepted 
for processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing to the Reserve Bank or to the offices of the Board of 
Governors. Any comment on an application that requests a hearing must 
include a statement of why a written presentation would not suffice in 
lieu of a hearing, identifying specifically any questions of fact that 
are in dispute and summarizing the evidence that would be presented at 
a hearing.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received not later than May 15, 1995.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of New York (William L. Rutledge, Senior 
Vice President) 33 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10045:
    1. UJB Financial Corp., Princeton, New Jersey; to acquire 100 
percent of the voting shares of Bancorp New Jersey, Inc., Somerville, 
New Jersey, and thereby indirectly acquire New Jersey Savings Bank, 
Somerville, New Jersey.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia (Michael E. Collins, Senior 
Vice President) 100 North 6th Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19105:
    1. United Financial, M.H.C., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; to become 
a bank holding company by acquiring at least 50.1 percent of the voting 
shares of United Savings Bank, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 17, 
1995.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-9902 Filed 4-20-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
```
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Thomas MORRIS, Appellant. Thomas MORRIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. 60123, 61874.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Dec. 22, 1992.

Ellen H. Flottman, Columbia, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Joan F. Edwards, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Thomas Morris (Defendant) was convicted by a jury of forcible sodomy and robbery in the first degree. He appeals his conviction and the denial of his *586untimely filed Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm per Rule 84.16(b). The verdict is supported by the evidence, and no error of law appears. An opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information, setting forth the reasons for this order.
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Petty, Chafin and Senior Judge Annunziata

KAREN D. WARE

MEMORANDUM OPINION *

v. Record No. 1648

- 12

- 3 PER CURIAM JANUARY 15, 2013

CENTRAL VIRGINIA TRAINING CENTER /

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

FROM TH E VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION

(Jaleh K. Slominski , on brief )

, for appellant.

( Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II, Attorney General; Wesley G . Russell, Jr., Deputy Attorney General; Peter R. Messitt, Senior Assistant Attorney General ; Scott John Fitzgerald, Se nior Assistant Attorney General, on brief), for appellee.

Karen D. Ware (her einafter “claimant”) appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation

Commission finding that she failed to meet her burden of proving a prima facie case that she w as

underpaid her workers’ compensation benefits. We have reviewed the record and the

commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Ware v. DBHS

- Central Virginia

Training Center/Commonwealth of Virginia , VWC File No. VA 00000092399 (Aug. 15, 2012).

We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the Court a nd argument would not aid the

decisional process. See Code § 17.1

- 403; Rule 5A:27.

Affirmed.

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1

- 413, this opinion is not designated for publication.UNPUBLISHED
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5659 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5659

    To prohibit Federal research agencies from carrying out certain 
       activities with certain countries, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 21, 2023

  Mr. Posey (for himself and Mr. Williams of New York) introduced the 
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Science, Space, 
                             and Technology

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To prohibit Federal research agencies from carrying out certain 
       activities with certain countries, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop Funding Our Adversaries' 
Research Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON FEDERAL RESEARCH AGENCIES CARRYING OUT CERTAIN 
              ACTIVITIES WITH CERTAIN COUNTRIES.

    (a) In General.--No funds appropriated or otherwise made available 
may be used by any Federal research agency (as such term is defined in 
section 10001 of the Research and Development, Competition, and 
Innovation Act (42 U.S.C. 18901)) to conduct research, develop, design, 
plan, promulgate, implement, or execute a policy, program, order, or 
contract of any kind with the government, or any agency or 
instrumentality of such government, of a country of concern, or an 
entity organized under the laws of such a country, unless any such 
activity is specifically authorized by an Act of Congress enacted after 
the date of the enactment of this section.
    (b) Definition.--In this section, the term ``country of concern'' 
means the People's Republic of China (including the Special 
Administrative Regions of China, including Hong Kong and Macau), 
Russia, Iran, North Korea, Cuba, and Venezuela.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 76 (Thursday, April 20, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19760-19761]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9738]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[NV-030-95-1220-00]


Temporary Closure of Public Lands: Nevada; Carson City District

Agency: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

Action: Temporary closure of certain public lands in Lyon and Douglas 
Counties on and adjacent to an Off Highway Vehicle race course: May 27-
28, 1995 Valley Off-Road Racing Association Yerington 300--Permit 
Number NV-035-95-12.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Walker Resource Area Manager announces the temporary 
closure of selected public lands under his administration. This action 
is being taken to provide for public safety and to protect adjacent 
resources during the official running of the Yerington 300 Off Highway 
Vehicle Race.

EFFECTIVE DATES: May 27 & 28, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fran Hull, Walker Area Recreation 
Planner, Carson City District, Bureau of Land Management, 1535 Hot 
Springs Road, Suite 300, Carson City, Nevada 89706, Telephone: (702) 
885-6000.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A map of the closure may be obtained from 
Fran Hull at the contact address. The event permittee is required to 
clearly mark and monitor the event route during the closure period. 
Spectators shall remain [[Page 19761]] in safe locations as directed by 
event officials and BLM personnel.
    Specific information pertaining to each event is as follows:
    1. Valley Off-Road Racing Association Yerington 300 Off-Road Race--
Permit Number NV-035-95-12. A multiple-lap OHV race on roads and washes 
near Yerington, Nevada in Douglas and Lyon Counties, within T12N R24E; 
T13N R24E; T14N R24E; T15N R24E; T16N R24E; T13N R25E; T15N R25E; T16N 
R25E; T17N R25E; T17N R26E.
    Bureau Lands to be closed include existing roads and washes 
identified on the ground as the 1995 Yerington 300 Off-Road Race route 
except at designated pit and spectator areas. Spectator areas are: the 
Start/Finish area and Gallagher Pass Road and Churchill Canyon Road. 
Camping on public lands in conjunction with the event must be a minimum 
of fifty yards away from the race course centerline. This closure will 
be in effect from 6:00 p.m. May 27 until midnight on May 28, 1995.
    The above restrictions do not apply to race officials, law 
enforcement and agency personnel monitoring the event.

    Authority: 43 CFR 8364 and 43 CFR 8372.

    Penalty: Any person failing to comply with the closure order may be 
subject to the penalties provided in 43 CFR 8360.7.

    Dated: April 7, 1995.
John Matthiessen,
Walker Resource Area Manager.
[FR Doc. 95-9738 Filed 4-19-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-HC-P
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Victoria UTHE, Appellant.

No. WD 51573.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

March 12, 1996.

R.E. Moulthrop Bethany, for appellant.

*201Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. General, Jill C. LaHue, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before SPINDEN, P.J., and BERREY and LAURA DENVIR STITH, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from conviction of one count of Class C stealing, § 570.030 RSMo 1994.

Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 74 (Tuesday, April 18, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 19415]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9566]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Footwear Management Co.; Amended Certification Regarding 
Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In the matter of: TA-W-30,545 Nocona Boot Company, Nocona, 
Texas; TA-W-30,545A Tony Lama Division, El Paso, Texas; A/K/A Justin 
Management Company, El Paso, Texas; TA-W-30,545B Justin Boot 
Company, Fort Worth, Texas; TA-W-30,545C Justin Boot Company, 
Cassville, Missouri; TA-W-30,545D Justin Boot Company, Sarcoxie, 
Missouri; and TA-W-30,545E Justin Boot Company, Carthage, Missouri.

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273) the Department of Labor issued an Amended Certification of 
Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on February 9, 
1995, applicable to all workers at the subject firm. The amended notice 
was published in the Federal Register on February 17, 1995 (60 FR 
9409).
    New information received from the company show that some of the 
workers at the Tony Lama Division, El Paso, Texas, had their 
unemployment insurance (UI) taxes paid to Justin Management Company.
    Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to 
properly reflect this matter.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-30,545 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    ``All workers of Footwear Management Company in the following 
divisions: Tony Lama Division, El Paso, Texas, a/k/a Justin 
Management Company, El Paso, Texas; Justin Boot Company, Fort Worth, 
Texas; Cassville, Missouri; Sarcoxie, Missouri; and Carthage 
Missouri and the Nocona Boot Company in Nocona, Texas who became 
totally or partially separated from employment on or after November 
29, 1993 are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under 
Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.''

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 6th day of April 1995.
Victor J. Trunzo,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 95-9566 Filed 4-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M