alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.01**

 

**Section 1350 Certification**

 

**In connection with this quarterly report of ML CornerstoneFuturesAccess LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,2006 as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this “Report”),I, Robert M. Alderman, Chief Executive Officer, President and Manager of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:**

 

1. This Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  May 15, 2006                             |
|-------------------------------------------------|
|                                            |
| By                                              | /s/ ROBERT M. ALDERMAN |   |
| Robert M. Alderman                              |
| Chief Executive  Officer, President and Manager |
| (Principal Executive  Officer)                  |

 

----
#### KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION, Complainant, v. Mary E. HATCHER, Respondent.

No. 96-SC-650-KB.

Supreme Court of Kentucky.

Sept. 26, 1996.

As Amended Sept. 27, 1996.

*OPINION AND ORDER*

On July 13, 1995 the Inquiry Tribunal of the Kentucky Bar Association charged that Respondent, Mary E. Hatcher, violated SCR 3.130-1.4(a) in that she failed to keep her clients reasonably informed about the status of their legal matters nor did she promptly comply with requests for information; and that she further violated subsection (b) in that she failed to explain the legal matter to her clients to the extent necessary to allow them to make informed decisions about their representation. The Inquiry Tribunal also charged Respondent with a violation of SCR 3.130-8.3(e) in that her failure to file a civil action after being directed and paid to do so by her clients and misrepresenting to her clients that the action had been filed involves “dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation.”

Respondent was retained to represent the interests of Johnny and Lana Schooley, husband and wife, in connection with the purchase of a home in Rineyville, Kentucky, and the rental of that home prior to purchase. The representation commenced in March 1994 and was terminated in August 1994. The Schooleys alleged that Respondent refused to return phone calls and cancelled appointments, thus failing to keep them informed about their legal matter. Further, the Schooleys alleged that Respondent had stated that a civil suit had been filed in their matter, when in fact, such had not been done.

The Board of Governors found that Respondent was, in fact, guilty of a violation of SCR 3.130-1.4(a) and (b) in that she failed to appropriately communicate with the Schoo-leys by returning phone calls and failed to fully and reasonably explain the legal matter sufficiently to allow the Schooleys to make informed decisions regarding their representation. However, the Board determined that Respondent was not guilty of a violation of 3.130-8.3(c) in that there was inadequate proof to sustain a charge that the Respondent’s conduct involved dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation. A Board majority has recommended that Respondent receive a public reprimand.

Upon consideration of the record, the Board’s recommendation, and the fact that Respondent has received a prior private reprimand, this Court hereby publicly reprimands Mary E. Hatcher. Her conduct constitutes a violation of SCR 3.130-1.4(a) and (b) and SCR 3.130-8.3(c). Additionally, Respondent is ordered to pay the costs of this proceeding, totalling $1,247.73.

*194All concur.

Entered: September 26,1996.

/s/ Robert F. Stephens Chief Justice
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Gilbert THOMAS, Appellant. Gilbert THOMAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 47971, WD 49644.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

March 7, 1995.

Rebecca L. Kurz, Asst. Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., David G. Brown, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before KENNEDY, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and HANNA, JJ.

*415
      *ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Consolidated appeal from conviction of sale of a controlled substance, § 195.211, RSMo Supp.1992, and from denial of a Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief.

Affirmed. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
**EXHIBIT      21.1**

| **SUBSIDIARIES OF FINLAY FINE JEWELRY CORPORATION** |    | **JURISDICTION** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------|------------------|
|                                                                         |         |             |
| Finlay Jewelry, Inc.                                               |         | Delaware         |
| Finlay                Merchandising & Buying, Inc.                       |         | Delaware         |
| Sonab                Holdings, Inc.                                          |         | Delaware         |
| Sonab                International, Inc.                                     |         | Delaware         |
| eFinlay,                Inc.                                                 |         | Delaware         |
| Carlyle                & Co. Jewelers LLC                                |         | Delaware         |
| Park                Promenade, LLC                                           |         | Florida          |
| L.                Congress, Inc.                                             |         | Florida          |

----
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 81 (Thursday, April 25, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 18412]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10213]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decrees Pursuant to the Resource 
Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, as Amended, 42 U.S.C. 6901 et 
seq.

    Notice is hereby given that a proposed consent decree in United 
States versus Flour City Architectural Metals, Inc., et al., Civil 
Action No. C2-96-327, was lodged on March 28, 1996, with the United 
States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio. The proposed 
consent decree provides that the defendants will pay $100,000 in civil 
penalties to the United States and perform a supplemental environmental 
project. The proposed consent decree will resolve certain claims of the 
United States against the defendants pursuant to an Administrative 
Consent Agreement and Final Order (``CAFO'') entered into on October 
27, 1988, regarding a steel wall panel manufacturing plant, formerly 
known as the E.G. Smith plant, located at 530 North Second Street in 
Cambridge, Ohio.
    The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the 
proposed consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General for the Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530, and should refer to 
Flour City Architectural Metals, Inc., et al., DOJ Ref. #90-7-1-628.
    The proposed consent decree may be examined at the office of the 
United States Attorney, Southern District of Ohio, 280 North High 
Street, Fourth Floor, Columbus, Ohio 43215; the Region 5 Office of the 
Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 
Illinois 60604; and at the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 
4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005, (202) 624-0892. A copy of the 
proposed consent decree may be obtained in person or by mail from the 
Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, 
D.C. 20005. In requesting a copy please refer to the referenced case 
and enclose a check in the amount of $6.25 (25 cents per page 
reproduction costs), payable to the Consent Decree Library.
Joel M. Gross,
Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environmental and Natural 
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 96-10213 Filed 4-24-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATION**I, Howard J. Nellor, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Peerless Systems Corporation;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;          (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and          (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):          (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: October 26, 2006 /s/ Howard J. Nellor  **Howard J. Nellor**    **President and Chief Executive Officer**    **(Principal Executive Officer)**
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4 , 2021.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 21

- 00349

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF L.A.F.S., J.E.S., JR., AND J.J.S., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 308th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2019

- 59876

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, C.M. , appeals a final decree signed June 2, 2021 , terminating her parental rights to the child ren who are the subject s of this suit. Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal.
Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in which s he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807, 811

– 13 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). The Anders2

procedures are applicable to an appeal from the te rmination of parental rights when an appointed attorney concludes that there are no non

- frivolous issues to assert on appeal. In re D.E.S. , 135 S.W.3d 326, 329 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] 2004, no pet.).

On August 27, 2021 , a copy of the record and c ounsel’s brief were delivered to appellant and appellant was notified of the right to file a pro se response. See Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); In re D.E.S. , 135
S.W.3d at 329

– 30. More than twenty

- five days have elapsed and as of this date, no pro se response has been filed.
We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in
the record. A discussion of the brief would a dd nothing to the jurisprudence of the

state. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

/s/ Jerry Zimmerer Justice

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Zimmerer and Wilson.
Exhibit 32The following certifications are being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, and are not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company,whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language insuch filing.**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officers of Peerless Systems Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),hereby certify, to each such officer’s knowledge, that:(i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Companyfor the quarter and year ended January 31, 2006 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.     Dated: October 26, 2006 /s/ Howard J. Nellor  Howard J. Nellor    President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)       Dated: October 26, 2006 /s/ John V. RIGALI John V. Rigali    Vice President of Finance and ChiefFinancial Officer (Principal FinancialOfficer)  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to PeerlessSystems Corporation and will be retained by Peerless Systems Corporation and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 31(b)****CERTIFICATIONS****CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**I, David C. Stuebe, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q (this “Report”) of Alpha NaturalResources, Inc. (the “Registrant”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this Report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisReport; 4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisReport is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation;and  c. Disclosed in this Report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting;5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        /s/ David C. Stuebe          David C. Stuebe      *Vice President and Chief Financial Officer*      *(Principal Financial Officer)*  Date: November 14, 2005
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6412

Wave Cyber USA, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report on
Form 10-Q of FSP Galleria North Corp. (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Barbara J. Fournier, Chief Operating Officer
and principal financial officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to her knowledge:



|(1) |  | the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







|Date: May 12, 2011 | /s/ Barbara J. Fournier
        Barbara J. Fournier
        Chief Operating Officer
        (Principal Financial Officer)
|------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Hak Jin Kim, the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Power Air Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 19, 2009

By: "Hak Jin Kim"Hak Jin Kim
President, Secretary, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and a director



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

__________
Exhibit 10.4

                             ADDENDUM TO EMPLOYMENT
                                    CONTRACT

         This Addendum to Employment Contract  ("Addendum") is made this 9th day
of August, 2004, and shall supplement and amend that Employee -Employer Contract
("Contract"),  dated  August 9th,  2001,  entered  into by and between  FreeStar
Technology  Corporation (formerly Freestar  Technologies),  a Nevada corporation
("Employer"), Calle Fantino Falco, J.A. Baez Building, 2nd Floor, Santo Domingo,
Dominican Republic, and Paul Egan ("Employee"),  AV Romula Betancourd 506, Santo
Domingo, Dominican Republic.

         All terms and conditions of the Contract not otherwise  amended by this
Addendum shall remain in full force and effect.

         The  Employer  and  Employee  agree that the contract be extended for a
further  three years  expiring on August 9th,  2007 .The  Employer  and Employee
agree that a remuneration review take place on or before 31st of December 2004.

         IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the  parties  have  caused  this  Addendum  to be
executed and delivered as of the date first above written.

                                   EMPLOYER:

                                   FREESTAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

                                   By: /s/ Ciaran Egan
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Ciaran Egan, Chief Financial Officer

                                   EMPLOYEE:

                                   PAUL EGAN

                                   By: /s/Paul Egan
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                      Paul Egan