alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

MANDATE

TO THE 366TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF COLLIN COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas, on the 9 th day of July, 2015 , the

cause on appeal to revise or reverse the judgment between

NASROLLAH JAFARZADEH AND

IDA ENGINEERING, INC., Appellants

No. 05

- 14

- 01404

- CV V.

MONIREH MAJD RAVANBAKSHS,

Appellee On Appea l from the 366th Judicial District

Court, Collin County, Texas.

Trial Court Cause No. 366

- 53521

- 2012.

Opinion delivered by Justice Evans.

Justices Fillmore and Myers, participating.

was determined; and this Court made its order in these words:

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

.

It is ORDERED that appellee MONIREH MAJD RAVANBAKSHS recover her costs of

this appeal from appellants NASROLLAH JAFARZADEH AND IDA ENGINEERING, INC..

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND Y OU to observe the order of the Court of Appeals

for the Fifth District of Texas, in this behalf, and have it duly obeyed and executed.

WITNESS the HON. CAROLYN WRIGHT, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals, with

the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of Dallas, this 18th day of September, 2015.

LISA MATZ, Clerk
#### Ronald R. PIERCE, Appellant, v. Virgina C. PIERCE, Respondent.

No. 70121.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Dec. 3, 1996.

Ronald R. Pierce, Jefferson City, pro se.

Sidney A. Thayer, Jr., Washington, for respondent.

Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Husband, *pro se,*appeals from the trial court’s judgment decree of divorce and award of custody and child support to Wife. An extended opinion would have no prece-*85dential value. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 67 (Friday, April 7, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 17790]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8582]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Steven L. Ohs, et al.; Change in Bank Control Notices; 
Acquisitions of Shares of Banks or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. Once the notices have been accepted for 
processing, they will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later 
than April 21, 1995.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (James M. Lyon, Vice 
President) 250 Marquette Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480:
    1. Steven L. Ohs, Glendive, Montana; to acquire 20 percent of the 
voting shares of Community First Bancorp, Glendive, Montana, and 
thereby indirectly acquire Community First Bancorp, Glendive, Montana, 
Glendive Bancorporation, Inc., Glendive, Montana, and First Fidelity 
Bank, Glendive, Montana.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Kenneth R. Binning, 
Director, Bank Holding Company) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, 
California 94105:
    1. Dr. Joel W. Kovner, Malibu, California; to retain up to 27.93 
percent of the voting shares of Professional Bancorp, Inc., Santa 
Monica, California, and thereby indirectly retain First Professional 
Bank, N.A., Santa Monica, California.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 3, 1995.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-8582 Filed 4-6-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHRISTOPHER LAWRENCE 

PETERMAN,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 52 WAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 23rd day of May, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Exhibit 9.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in Subsea 7 S.A.s Registration Statements File Nos. 333-124983 and 333-166574 on Form S-8 and File No. 333-86288 on Form F-3 and Form F-3/A of our reports relating to the consolidated financial statements of Subsea 7 S.A. and
subsidiaries (the Group) and the effectiveness of the Groups internal control over financial reporting dated February 23, 2011, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Group for the year ended November 30, 2010.



|                      
|----------------------
|/s/ Deloitte LLP      
|Deloitte LLP          
|London, United Kingdom
|February 23, 2011
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 80 (Wednesday, April 24, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 18134]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10035]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP96-211-000]


Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation; Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

April 18, 1996.
    Take notice on April 15, 1996, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line 
Corporation (Transco), tendered for filing certain revised tariff 
sheets to its FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1 which tariff 
sheets are enumerated in Appendix A attached to the filing. The 
proposed effective date is June 1, 1996.
    Transco states that the purpose of the instant filing is for the 
limited purpose of eliminating the requirement that a shipper schedule 
a separate transaction in order to utilize, on a secondary basis, 
flexible delivery points located upstream or downstream of such 
shipper's traditional delivery point(s).
    Transco states that it is serving copies of the instant filing to 
customers, State Commissions and other interested parties.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as provided 
in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies for this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-10035 Filed 4-23-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 78 (Monday, April 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20118-20119]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9999]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Information Collections Under Review

    The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has been sent the 
following collection(s) of information proposals for review under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35) and 
the Paperwork Reduction Reauthorization Act since the last list was 
published. Entries are grouped into submission categories, with each 
entry containing the following information:
    (1) The title of the form/collection;
    (2) The agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of 
the Department sponsoring the collection;
    (3) Who will be asked or required to respond, as well as a brief 
abstract;
    (4) An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount 
of time estimated for an average respondent to respond;
    (5) An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated 
with the collection; and,
    (6) An indication as to whether Section 3504(h) of Public Law 96-
511 applies.
    Comments and/or suggestions regarding the item(s) contained in this 
notice, especially regarding the estimated public burden and associated 
response time, should be directed to the OMB reviewer, Mr. Jeff Hill on 
(202) 395-7340 and to the Department of Justice's Clearance Officer, 
Mr. Robert B. Briggs, on (202) 514-4319. If you anticipate commenting 
on a form/collection, but find that time to prepare such comments will 
prevent you from prompt submission, you should notify the OMB reviewer 
and the Department of Justice Clearance Officer of your intent as soon 
as possible. Written comments regarding the burden estimate or any 
other aspect of the collection may be submitted to Office of 
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 
Washington, DC 20503, and to Mr. Robert B. Briggs, Department of 
Justice Clearance Officer, Systems Policy Staff/Information Resources 
Management/Justice Management Division, Suite 850, WCTR, Washington, DC 
20530.

Extension of a Currently Approved Collection

    (1) Application To Adjust Status From Temporary To Permanent 
Resident.
    (2) Form I-698. Immigration and Naturalization Service, United 
States Department of Justice.
    (3) Primary=Individuals or households. Others=None. This 
information will be used by the Immigration and Naturalization Service 
to collect the necessary information to adjudicate the application and 
issue an Alien Registration Card (Form I-551).
    (4) 300,000 annual respondents at 1.0 hours per response.
    (5) 300,000 annual burden hours. [[Page 20119]] 
    (6) Not applicable under Section 3504(h) of Public Law 96-511.
    Public comment on this item is encouraged.

    Dated: April 18, 1995.
Robert B. Briggs,
Department Clearance Officer, United States Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 95-9999 Filed 4-21-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-10-M
| 1) |   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2) |   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Registrant. |
|----|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                |   |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|  By:      /s/ Michael J. Quillen                               |   |
|        Michael J. Quillen                                      |   |   |
| Chairman      of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer |   |   |
| (Principal      Executive Officer)                                  |   |   |
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Accentia Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) for the three months ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form
10-Q), I, Alan M. Pearce, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: August 16, 2010



|                                 
|---------------------------------
|/s/ Alan M. Pearce               
|Alan M. Pearce                   
|Chief Financial Officer; Director

This certification
accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Accentia Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 2.3


                       STOLT COMEX SEAWAY S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                   STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                    FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 1997 AND 1996
                    (Amounts in thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>



                                                       1997              1996

<S>                                               <C>            <C>
Earnings
Net Income (Loss)                                 $  39,001      $    (14,902)
                                                  ---------      ------------
                                                  ---------      ------------


Primary Earnings Per Share:             
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding           31,582            20,000
Net Effect of Dilutive Stock Options - based
 on the treasury stock method using average prices      162                 -
                                                  ---------      ------------

Weighted Average Common Shares and
   Common Share Equivalents                          31,744            20,000
                                                  ---------      ------------
                                                  ---------      ------------

Net Income (Loss)                                 $    1.23      $      (0.75)
                                                  ---------      ------------

Primary Earnings Per Share                        $    1.23      $      (0.75)
                                                  ---------      ------------
                                                  ---------      ------------

Fully Diluted Earnings Per Share:
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding           31,582            20,000
Net Effect of Dilutive Stock Options - based
   on the treasury stock method using the
   year-end market price if higher than the
   average market price                                 195                 -
                                                  ---------      ------------

Fully Diluted Weighted Average Common Shares
   and Common Share Equivalents                      31,777            20,000
                                                  ---------      ------------
                                                  ---------      ------------

Net Income (Loss)                                 $    1.23      $      (0.75)
                                                  ---------      ------------
Fully Diluted Earnings Per Share                  $    1.23      $      (0.75)
                                                  ---------      ------------

</TABLE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7207

Clark Material Handling Co:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_5-30-2019.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
Exhibit
31.2





CERTIFICATIONS





I,
Michael W. Overby, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Triton Distribution Systems,
Inc.;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.









Date:
July 8,
2008                           By:/s/ Michael W.
Overby


Michael W. Overby


Chief Financial Officer
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-7396

Nissan North America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-3571

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Eastern

* District of Missouri.

Fred Ahlemeier, III *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: November 3, 1998

Filed: November 20, 1998

___________

Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

This matter is before the court pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure

9(a), the district court having ordered pretrial detention in this criminal case.

This sixty-year-old lifetime resident of St. Louis has no criminal history. He is

now charged with one count of possession–not manufacture–of child pornography. He

also possessed an unusual and disturbing, but perhaps legal, collection of weapons,

explosives and related material. To date, his having this collection has not resulted in

additional criminal charges.
-2-

Under the facts as we understand them from the papers, affidavits and other

portions of the record on appeal, including a transcript of the district court proceeding,

we believe that further pretrial detention is not warranted.

It may well be, however, that conditions of release designed to ensure the

defendant's appearance at trial and to protect the safety of other persons and the

community as a whole may be in order. Accordingly, we remand this case to the

district court to consider such conditions in conjunction with an order releasing

Ahlemeier from detention pending appeal.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.