alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7314

BYD Motors, Inc:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/84_FR_21389.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
#### In the Interest of: D.R.J., Respondent, v. *, Appellant.

No. 67631.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Dec. 5, 1995.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Feb. 20, 1996.

*257Victor C. Strauss, Jr., St. Louis, for appellant.

*Donna*L. Head, Lisa A. Herder, Guardian ad Litem, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and DOWD, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Father appeals the trial court’s judgment terminating his parental rights in D.R.J., a minor. We affirm. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 106 (Friday, June 4, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 30040]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-11736]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9056-8]


Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information 202-564-5632 or https://www.epa.gov/nepa.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS)
Filed May 24, 2021 10 a.m. EST Through May 28, 2021 10 a.m. EST
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/cdx-enepa-public/action/eis/search.

EIS No. 20210061, Final, USFS, CA, Stanislaus National Forest Over-Snow 
Vehicle (OSV) Use Designation, Review Period Ends: 07/06/2021, Contact: 
Kathryn Wilkinson 248-672-0518.

EIS No. 20210062, Final, TREAS, MD, Construction and Operation of a 
Currency Production Facility within the National Capital Region, Review 
Period Ends: 07/06/2021, Contact: Charles Davis 202-874-3259.

EIS No. 20210063, Draft Supplement, USACE, CA, American River Watershed 
Common Features Water Resources Development Act of 2016, American River 
Contract 2, Comment Period Ends: 07/19/2021, Contact: Public Affairs 
Office 916-557-5101.

EIS No. 20210064, Draft, GSA, MD, U.S. Food and Drug Administration 
Muirkirk Road Campus Master Plan, Comment Period Ends: 07/19/2021, 
Contact: Marshall Popkin 202-919-0026.

EIS No. 20210065, Final, BIA, NV, Southern Bighorn Solar Projects, 
Review Period Ends: 07/06/2021, Contact: Chip Lewis 602-390-2014.

    Dated: May 28, 2021.
Cindy S. Barger,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2021-11736 Filed 6-3-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6390

Apergy ESP Systems, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alfredo IRIARTE-ORTEGA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 96-50151.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Nov. 5, 1997.

Before: BOOCHEVER, KOZINSKI, and JOHN T. NOONAN, Circuit Judges.

The opinion filed May 9, 1997 [113 F.3d 1022], is amended as follows:

Slip op. pg. 5492, lines 11-12 [113 F.3d at 1024]:

> Change “fifteen years” to “146 months”.

*1201Slip op. pg. 5492, footnote 1, line 1 [113 F.3d at 1024]:

> Add ‘Triarte challenges only the first element, i.e., that he entered an agreement to accomplish an illegal objective. *See*Brief for Appellant at 26 (“The failure of proof in this case lies entirely in the failure to prove that any agreement was ever made and that Mr. Triarte knowingly and intentionally joined some agreement.”) (emphasis omitted).”.

> Start the next sentence in footnote 1 (“Both the government and Iriarte ...”) as a new paragraph.

The petition for rehearing is otherwise denied. The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en bane and no active judge has requested a vote thereon. The suggestion for rehearing en banc is therefore rejected. Fed. R.App. P. 35(b).
riLLfj

IN TMf CjUf-.- cr A-f

A i 1A N /\ N i L S i . f L •

2017NOV-1 PHI):03

Cause No. 04-17-00477- CV

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

Christopher Olivarri & Maria Olivarri Appellant

Vs.

Ray Jesse Olivarri Jr. Appellee

Response to Appellee's Brief

Filed October 30^ 2017

Christopher Olivarri

Maria Olivarri

523 Cosgrove Street

San Antonio, Texas 78210

210-906-6288

Email: olivari@swbell.net

Pro Se
#### Robert REED, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 56598.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.

Dec. 19, 1989.

Laurence G. Schmidt, Public Defender, Hillsboro, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Robert Y. Franson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

DOWD, Judge.

Movant pleaded guilty to the offense of burglary in the second degree and was sentenced as a persistent offender to twelve years imprisonment. On January 14, 1988, movant was delivered to the Missouri Department of Corrections. On September 20, 1988, movant filed a Rule 24.035 motion claiming ineffective assistance of counsel. The motion was denied because it was filed more than ninety days after mov-ant was delivered to the department of corrections and was thus untimely filed. Rule 24.035(b).

Movant now appeals, claiming that because the trial court did not advise him of his right to file a 24.035 motion within ninety days, the trial court should have exercised its discretion under Rule 44.01 to enlarge the time for filing. Our Supreme Court has recently stated in *Day v. State,*770 S.W.2d 692, 695 (Mo. banc 1989), that the time limitations of Rules 24.035 and 29.15 are mandatory. While Rule 29.-07(b)(4) indicates a trial judge should inform a movant of his right to a Rule 24.035 or 29.15 motion, there is no indication in the rules or case law that failure to do so overrides the mandatory time limitations. In addition, the rule does not require the sentencing court to specifically advise defendant of the ninety day time limit. The motion court correctly held that movant failed to file a timely motion and thus the court had no jurisdiction to address the claim.

Because we hold that the motion was not timely, we need not address movant’s second point, claiming he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing.

The judgment is affirmed.

SIMON, C.J., and JOSEPH J. SIMEONE, Senior Judge, concur.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6297

OSRAM Opto Semiconductors, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China. 

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXHIBIT 99.02


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Phoenix Leasing American  Business Fund,
L.P. (the  "Partnership") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I, Andrew Gregson,  Chief Financial  Officer of the General Partner,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
              material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  results  of
              operations of the Partnership.

                                                       /S/ANDREW GREGSON
                                                       -----------------
                                                       Andrew Gregson
                                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                                       March 28, 2003
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

June 23, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136282 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 136282 

 COA: 273234 

Muskegon CC: 06-052984-FC

EDDIE RYAN LEWIS, a/k/a EDWARD LEWIS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 28, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0616 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 23, 2008 

 Clerk
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
§1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Terry G.
Roussel and Sharon C. Kaiser, do each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Cornerstone
Core Properties REIT, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the three -month period ended March
31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of  Cornerstone Core Properties REIT, Inc.





/s/ TERRY G. ROUSSELDate:  May
      9, 2008
            Terry
      G. RousselChief
      Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer)





/s/ SHARON C. KAISERDate:  May
      9, 2008
            Sharon
      C. KaiserChief
      Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 80 (Wednesday, April 24, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 18185]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10037]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 1-10938]


Issuer Delisting; Notice of Application to Withdraw From Listing 
and Registration; (Semiconductor Packaging Materials Co., Inc., Common 
Stock, $.10 Par Value)

April 18, 1996.
    Semiconductor Packaging Materials Co., Inc. (``Company'') has filed 
an application with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 12(d) of the Securities Exchange 
Act of 1934 (``Act'') and Rule 12d2-2(d) promulgated thereunder, to 
withdraw the above specified security (``Security'') from listing and 
registration on the American Stock Exchange, Inc. (``Amex'').
    The reasons alleged in the application for withdrawing the Security 
from listing and registration include the following:
    According to the Company, its Board of Directors unanimously 
approved resolutions on January 30, 1996 to withdraw the Company's 
Security from listing on the Amex and instead, to list the Security on 
The Nasdaq Stock Market (``Nasdaq''). The decision of the Board 
followed a thorough study of the matter and was based upon the belief 
that listing the Security on the Nasdaq/NMS will be more beneficial to 
the Company's shareholders than the present listing on the Amex because 
it will increase liquidity, increase the depth of market for its 
security and lessen the volatility of its security.
    Any interested person may, on or before May 9, 1996 submit by 
letter to the Secretary of the Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 
Fifth Street NW., Washington, D.C. 20549, facts bearing upon whether 
the application has been made in accordance with the rules of the 
exchanges and what terms, if any, should be imposed by the Commission 
for the protection of investors. The Commission, based on the 
information submitted to it, will issue an order granting the 
application after the date mentioned above, unless the Commission 
determines to order a hearing on the matter.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
pursuant to delegated authority.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-10037 Filed 4-23-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 77 (Friday, April 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 19982]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9883]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart Q During 
the Week Ended April 14, 1995

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
Q of the Department of Transportation's Procedural Regulations (See 14 
CFR 302.1701 et seq.). The due date for Answers, Conforming 
Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below for each 
application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.

    Docket Number: 50279.
    Date filed: April 10, 1995.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: May 8, 1995.
    Description: Application of Executive Airlines, Inc., Flagship 
Airlines, Inc., Simmons Airlines, Inc., and Wings West Airlines, Inc. 
(d/b/a American Eagle), pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 41008 and Subpart Q of 
the Regulations, applies for a certificate of public convenience and 
necessity authorizing foreign air transportation of persons, property, 
and mail between any point in the United States and any point in 
Canada, subject to the two- and three-year phase-in conditions for 
Vancouver, Montreal, and Toronto set forth in the United States-Canada 
Air Transport Agreement signed on February 24, 1995.

    Docket Number: 50291.
    Date filed: April 13, 1995.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: May 11, 1995.
    Description: Application of Khors Air Company, pursuant to 49 
U.S.C. Section 41203 and Subpart Q of the Regulations, applies for a 
foreign air carrier permit authorizing it to provide (1) foreign 
charter all-cargo air transportation between the United States and 
Ukraine, and (2) fifth Freedom foreign charter all-cargo air 
transportation between the United States and third countries pursuant 
to Part 212 of the Regulations.

    Docket Number: 48075.
    Date filed: April 13, 1995.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: May 11, 1995.
    Description: Seventh Amendment to Application of Laker Airways 
(Bahamas) Limited, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 41302, and Subpart Q of the 
Regulations, amends its currently pending application to the extent 
necessary to permit Laker to add the terminal point New Orleans, 
Louisiana to the points that Laker has applied to serve from Freeport 
and Nassau, Bahamas.
Paulette V. Twine,
Chief, Documentary Services Division.
[FR Doc. 95-9883 Filed 4-20-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
Bonanza Oil & Gas, Inc. - Exhibit 10.14 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com






Purchase Agreement 

March 25, 2010 

Superior Oil and Gas Co. 
215 West Main, Suite 200


  Norman, OK 73069 

Bonanza Oil & Gas, Inc. 
3417 Mercer, Suite E

Houston, TX 77027 

RE: Lewis #1-12 Well, Logan County, Oklahoma

          This
Purchase Agreement is between Superior Oil & Gas Co. of Oklahoma and Bonanza
Oil & Gas, Inc. regarding the Lewis #1-12 Well, located in the NW/4 of
Section 12, T18N, R3W consisting of 160 acres located in Logan County, Oklahoma.


          Superior
Oil and Gas Co., (hereinafter called “Assignor”) has agreed to sell an interest
in the Lewis #1-12 Well, located in the NW/4 of Section 12, T18N, R3W consisting
of 160 acres located in Logan County, Oklahoma. In exchange for Fifteen Thousand
Dollars ($15,000) to be paid by Assignee and five Million (5,000,000) shares of
restricted stock of Bonanza Oil & Gas, Inc. (BGOI), Assignors will assign to
Assignee certain interests. 

          Bonanza
Oil & Gas, Inc., (hereinafter called “Assignee”) has agreed to purchase an
interest in the Lewis #1-12 Well, located in the NW/4 of Section 12, T18N, R3W
consisting of 160 acres located in Logan County, Oklahoma.

          Assignor
will collectively assign to Assignee, a Ten Percent (10%) carried working
interest (CWI) in the Lewis Well, unit, and the associated oil and gas leases.
This assignment is not proportionately reduced against the proportionate
interest of the Assignor and is a full 10% working interest. Assignor intends to
pay Assignee its proportionate share of the total net revenue interest from the
well and unit after deducting standard operating charges, taxes, and all royalty
burdens. 

Page 1 of 2 




          This
“Purchase Agreement” is executed on the date first stated above. 

ASSIGNORS: 

	Signature: 	/s/ Dan Lloyd, Jr. 	 
	Name: 	Dan Lloyd, Jr. 	 
	For: 	Superior Oil and Gas Co. 	 


 

ASSIGNEE: 

	Signature: 	/s/ Bill Wiseman 	 
	Name: 	Bill Wiseman 	 
	For: 	Bonanza Oil & Gas, Inc. 	 


Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 12.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Tom Ehret, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Stolt Offshore S.A.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report; and

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

Date:  August 15, 2005

                                              /s/ Tom Ehret
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Tom Ehret
                                             Chief Executive Officer
                                             (principal executive officer)
Exhibit 23.01





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS





The Board of Directors and Shareholders


The 3DO Company:





We hereby consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-3 (Nos. 333-80309, 333-72190, 333-75934 and 333-53576) and on Forms S-8 (Nos.
333-52004 and 333-84758) of The 3DO Company of our report dated May 10, 2002 relating to the consolidated financial statements which appear in this Form 10-K.





/s/    PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS, LLP





San Jose, California


June 28, 2002