alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**






STATEMENT
      REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Axiom III, Inc (the
      "Company") for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2006, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, Lawrence M. Nault, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
      the
      Company, certify that:




*
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




*
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









/s/
      Lawrence M. Nault


Lawrence
      M. Nault


President,
      Chief Executive Officer,


Chief
      Financial Officer, Comptroller





September
      5, 2006







This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
First Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.4 

FIRST AMENDMENT 

TO 

EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

Pursuant to Section 14 of the Executive Employment Agreement effective as of August 31, 2001 (the “Agreement”)
entitled “Waiver; Modification,” the parties to the Agreement hereby modify the Agreement as provided below. 

Section 6(b)(ii) shall be amended by deleting the second sentence thereto and by replacing it with the following sentence: 

 Such payment shall be made, in the Company’s sole discretion, either (1) in accordance with normal payroll
procedures applicable to senior officers at the time of such termination; (2) in a single lump sum payment; or (3) in a combination of normal payroll procedures followed by a lump sum payment for the balance of the payment; provided, that,
in all cases, all payments shall be completed within the taxable year in which the Officer terminates employment, or such later time as permitted under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code or its successor and the guidance provided by the
Internal Revenue Service or Department of Treasury, such that the amount paid shall not be considered “deferred compensation” within the meaning of Section 409A. 

Section 6(b)(iii) and 6(c)(iii) shall be amended by deleting the provisions in their entirety and by replacing them with the
following sentence: 
 Continued participation in the Company’s fringe benefits; provided, however, that such
continuation of benefits after termination shall not apply to those fringe benefits which require a minimum number of hours of employment for participation, such as 401k, life insurance and other employee insurance. The Company shall reimburse
Officer for COBRA payments for continued medical benefits and insurance for the severance period to the extent incurred. 
 The
Officer, to the extent determined to be nondiscriminatory under the Company’s qualified employee benefit plans, shall become fully vested in his benefits under such plans. Additionally, the Officer shall become fully vested with respect to any
of the Company’s non-qualified benefit plans in which he is a participant. 
 All other provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full
force and unamended. 
 Dated this 1st day February of 2005. 

 

			
	FIRST STATE BANCORPORATION
		
	BY:	 	  

		
	TITLE:	 	  

	
	EXECUTIVE
**EXHIBIT
        32.1**
  STATEMENT
        REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
 TO
        SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of BlueSky Systems, Corp.
        (the "Company") for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, as filed
        with
        the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
        I,
        Karol Kapinos, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
        Company, certify that:
 
 *   the
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  *   information
        contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
        condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
  
 /s/
        Karol Kapinos
 Karol
        Kapinos
 President,
        Chief Executive Officer,
 Chief
        Financial Officer, Controller
 
 August
        13, 2007
 
  This
        certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
        the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by us for purposes of Section
        18 of
        the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
        amended.
#### Lawrence G. BRUNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 51396.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

April 2, 1996.

Rose Wibbenmeyer, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Kurt U. Schaefer, Asst. Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before HANNA, P.J., and SMART and ELLIS, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from the denial of Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an eviden-tiary hearing.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                                 March 29, 2002


         Securities and Exchange Commission

         Judiciary Plaza

         450 Fifth Street, N.W.

         Washington, DC 20549

         Re:   Arthur Andersen LLP



         Ladies and Gentlemen:

     Pursuant to Temporary Note 3T to Article 3 of Regulation S-X adopted by the
Securities and Exchange Commission, Arthur Andersen LLP has represented to us
the following regarding the audit of our consolidated balance sheets as of
December 31, 2001, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 2001:

     The audit was subject to Arthur Andersen's quality control system for the
U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance that the
engagement was conducted in compliance with professional standards; that there
was appropriate continuity of Arthur Andersen personnel working on the audit;
availability of national office consultation and availability of personnel at
foreign affiliates of Arthur Andersen was not relevant to this audit.

                                     Sincerely,

                                     Nuance Communications, Inc.

                                     /s/ William Dewes

                                     William Dewes
                                     Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Kelsey, Petty and Seni or Judge Bumgardner

SUMMIT REHABILITA TION, P.C. AND AMERICAN ZURICH INSURANCE COMPANY MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 2676-07-1 PER CURIAM MARCH 11, 2008 CHRISTINE S. EDWARDS

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Kevin D. Sharp; Taylor & Walker, P.C., on brief), for appellants. (Ann K. Sullivan; Melissa Morris Picco; Cr enshaw, Ware & Martin, P.L.C., on brief), for appellee.

Summit Rehabilitation, P.C. and its insurer (her einafter referred to as “employer”) appeal a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Co mmission awarding compensation benefits to Christine S. Edwards (claimant). Employe r argues the commission erred by finding that claimant proved her March 7, 2006 injury by acci dent (1) arose out of her employment; and (2) occurred in the course of her employmen t. In its October 12, 2007 opinion, the commission specifically stated that employer’s assertion on review was that claimant’s accident did not arise out of the employment, and addr essed that sole issue. Acco rdingly, because the commission did not address the “in the course of employment” is sue on review, we are barred from considering it on appeal. See Rule 5A:18; see also Kendrick v. Nationwide Homes, Inc. , 4 Va. App. 189, 192, 355 S.E.2d 347, 349 (1987). 1

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opin ion is not designated for publication.

1 To the extent that employer’s written stat ement on review could be construed to raise the “in the course of employment” issue, empl oyer failed to obtain a ruling from the commission on review on that issue by filing a motion for reconsideration or rehearing. Thus, we are barred- 2 - With respect to the “arising out of the empl oyment” issue, we have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this app eal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the co mmission in its final opinion. See Edwards v. Summit Rehabilitation, P.C. , VWC File No. 227-80-33 (Oct. 12, 2007). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and lega l contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument w ould not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.

Affirmed.

from considering it on appeal by Rule 5A:18. See Williams v. Gloucester Sheriff’s Dep’t , 266 Va. 409, 411, 587 S.E.2d 546, 548 (2003). Employer does not argue that we should invoke the exceptions to Rule 5A:18, and we decline to do so sua sponte

. Edwards v. Commonwealth , 41 Va. App. 752, 761, 589 S.E.2d 444, 448 (2003) ( en banc ).
#### Ronald R. BOLANOS, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 41162.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

July 25, 1989.

Richard E. McFadin & F.A. White, Jr. of McFadin, White & Fincham, Kansas City, for movant-appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before GAITAN, P.J., and MANFORD and ULRICH, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Direct appeal from the denial of post-conviction relief sought pursuant to Rule 29.-15.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
#### Judy FIERSTEIN, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Jeffrey FIERSTEIN, Defendant/Respondent.

No. 67979.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Dec. 12, 1995.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Feb. 7, 1996.

Application to Transfer Denied March 26, 1996.

Theodore S. Schechter, Michael L. Schechter, Schechter & Watkins, P.C., Clayton, for appellant.

Thomas M. Blumenthal, Bruce E. Friedman, Paule, Camazine & Blumenthal, P.C., Clayton, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and RHODES RUSSELL, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Wife appeals the trial court’s order granting husband’s motion to dismiss wife’s petition to set aside the decree of dissolution. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the trial court are not erroneous; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Order filed October 25, 2016 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-16-00374-CV

____________

MISHA FERGUSON ET AL, Appellant

V.

QIAO ZHOU ET AL, Appellee

On Appeal from County Civil Court at Law No. 4

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1073353

ORDER

On October 4, 2016, this court issued an order to the Harris County District 

Clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record by October 14, 2016. The court has not 

received the supplemental clerk’s record.

The Harris County Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record on 

or before November 4, 2016, containing the notice of appeal.

If the omitted item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to 

file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the omitted 

item is not a part of the case file

PER CURIAM
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

#### **SECTION 1350CERTIFICATIONS**

#### ** **

ThisCertificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of Section 1350of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal Procedures) of theUnited States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not, except to the extent required by theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

Theundersigned, who are the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer ofBehringer Harvard Opportunity REIT I, Inc. (the “Company”), each herebycertify as follows:

 

TheQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company (the “Report”), whichaccompanies this Certificate, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated  this 14th day of May, 2010. |   |                                       |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|                                    |   |                                       |
|                                    |   | /s/ Robert S. Aisner                       |
|                                    |   | Robert S. Aisner, Chief  Executive Officer |
|                                    |   |                                       |
|                                    |   |                                       |
|                                    |   | /s/ Gary S. Bresky                         |
|                                    |   | Gary S. Bresky, Chief  Financial Officer   |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrantand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 74 (Tuesday, April 18, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 19414]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9565]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-30,866]


Nylon Staple Fibers Department, Lowland, TN; Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on March 27, 1995 in response to a worker petition which 
was filed on behalf of workers at BASF Corporation, Lowland, Tennessee.
    All workers of the subject firm are covered under amended 
certification (TA-W-30,360B). Consequently, further investigation in 
this case would serve no purpose; and the investigation has been 
terminated.

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 10th day of April, 1995.
Victor J. Trunzo,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 95-9565 Filed 4-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

                In connection with the Annual Report onForm 10-K of EarthLink, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year endedDecember 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael C. Lunsford, Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:

(1)          the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/  MICHAEL  C. LUNSFORD |
|-------------------------------------|
|                                |
| Michael C. Lunsford                 |
| Interim Chief Executive Officer     |
| March 1, 2007                       |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>      THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL
              INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE MEDISYS
              TECHNOLOGIES, INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
              PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
              ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
              STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>   1

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          290,269
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   448,727
<ALLOWANCES>                                    226,627
<INVENTORY>                                     369,601
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                983,844
<PP&E>                                          908,394
<DEPRECIATION>                                  314,751
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                2,109,780
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         1,830,045
<BONDS>                                         304,490
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                         23,863
<OTHER-SE>                                   10,659,432
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  2,109,780
<SALES>                                       2,716,819
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              2,716,819
<CGS>                                         2,017,844
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 1,832,917
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                109,461
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              341,503
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,584,841)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,584,841)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,584,841)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.04)


</TABLE>
Extension for Interest Bearing Secured Promissory Note dated January 20, 2006



 Exhibit 10.10 
 EXTENSION FOR 
 INTEREST BEARING SECURED 
 PROMISSORY NOTE 
 Tampa, Florida 
 January 20, 2006 
 On June 25, 2004
Expedition Holdings, Inc. (the "Maker") and Total M.I.S., Inc. (the "Holder") entered into a $100,000 Secured Promissory Note (the "Note"). The Note is due in full on June 25, 2006. 
 The Holder and Maker have agreed to extend the Term of the Note until July 1, 2007 for no additional consideration. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned Maker and Holder have executed this extension as of the date first written above and, by their signature, have
indicated their acceptance of all terms and conditions set forth herein. 
  

			
	MAKER:
	
	EXPEDITION HOLDINGS, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Jerry Keller

		 	Jerry Keller, President
		
		 	HOLDER:
		
		 	TOTAL M.I.S., INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Edwin McGusty

		 	Edwin McGusty, President
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

152 

CAF 11-02335 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND VALENTINO, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF JOHNNY TORRES, 

PETITIONER-APPELLANT, 

V ORDER

JAMIE NESTARK, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. 

 

JENNIFER M. LORENZ, LANCASTER, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

EVELYNE A. O’SULLIVAN, EAST AMHERST, FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. 

DAVID C. SCHOPP, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF

BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (CHARLES D. HALVORSEN OF COUNSEL), FOR JOHNNY

T., JR. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Margaret

O. Szczur, J.), entered October 24, 2011 in a proceeding pursuant to

Family Court Act article 8. The order dismissed the petition. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Entered: February 1, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
CONSENT OF SEWELL AND COMPANY, PA


The  Board  of  Directors  of
NetWeb  OnLine.Com,  Inc.

Ref: SEC  File  No.  0-28833

     We  hereby  consent  to  incorporation  by  reference  in  the Registration
Statement  of  NetWeb  OnLine.Com, Inc. on Form 10-KSB filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission on January 12, 2001, of our reports dated November 30,
2000,  relating  to  the financial statements of NetWeb OnLine.Com, Inc. for the
fiscal  years  ended  September  30,  2000.


/S/
SEWELL  AND  COMPANY,  PA
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

      ( print page 30342)    

# TIME AND DATE:

2 p.m. on Thursday, June 10, 2021.

# PLACE:

The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

# STATUS:

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

                        In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website at                         *https://www.sec.gov.*

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.

The subject matter of the closed meeting will consist of the following topics:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;

Resolution of litigation claims; and

Other matters relating to examinations and enforcement proceedings.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of adjudicatory, examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

For further information; please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: June 3, 2021.

Vanessa A. Countryman, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2021-11949 Filed 6-3-21; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P