alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In
connection with the Quarterly report of JayHawk Energy Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lindsay E. Gorrill,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;
and
  (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
  A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
JayHawk Energy, Inc. and will be retained by JayHawk Energy, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
  Date:
      August 14, 2008
              By:
      /s/ LINDSAY E. GORRILLName:
      Lindsay E. GorrillTitle:
      Chief Executive
Officer
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002

Each of the undersigned, W. Bruce Johnson, Interim Chief Executive Officer and President of Sears Holdings Corporation (the
Company) and Michael D. Collins, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, has executed this certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Companys Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended August 1, 2009 (the Report).

Each of the undersigned hereby
certifies that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

August 24, 2009





|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ W. Bruce Johnson                             
|W. Bruce Johnson                                 
|Interim Chief Executive Officer and President    
|                                                 
|/s/ Michael D. Collins                           
|Michael D. Collins                               
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### Thelma CRAIS, Appellant, v. Neal HAYNES, et al., Appellees.

No. 10-93-078-CV.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Waco.

Dec. 22, 1993.

*413Kenneth W. Byford, Byford & Associates, P.C., Dallas, for appellant.

Lisa Stegall, Thompson, Coe, Cousins *&*Irons, Dallas, for appellees.

Before THOMAS, C.J., and CUMMINGS and VANCE, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

To review the granting of the judgment n.o.v., we require copies of the court’s charge, the jury verdict, and the judgment rendered on the verdict, which were not requested and have not been included in the transcript on file. Rule 51(a) states that “[u]nless otherwise designated by the parties in accordance with Rule 50, the transcript on appeal *shall*include copies of the following: ... the charge of the court and the verdict of the jury ... [and] the court’s judgment or other order appealed from_” *See*Tex. R.App.P. 51(a). Rule 55 allows us, in order to remedy defects appearing after submission, to set the submission aside and “make such orders as may be necessary to secure a more satisfactory submission of the case_” *Id*at 55(c).

We are mindful of the language of Rule 50(d) which states that the burden is on the appellant to see that a sufficient record is presented to show error requiring reversal. *Id.*at 50(d). We are also aware of the opinion in *Attorney General of Texas v. Segree,*694 S.W.2d 383, 384 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1985, no writ), which provides that the burden rests upon the appellant to see that the appellate record is timely filed, despite the language of what was then Rule 376 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, which directed the clerk of the trial court to prepare and transmit a transcript of the proceedings upon perfection of the appeal. Tex.R.Civ.P. 376 (Vernon 1985).

However, Rule 83 states that “[a] judgment shall not be affirmed or reversed or an appeal dismissed for defects or irregularities, in appellate procedure, either of form or substance, without allowing a reasonable time to correct or amend such defects or irregularities....”

Because we believe that the omission of the charge, verdict and judgment from the transcript is a “defect of appellate procedure,” we hereby set aside the submission pursuant to Rule 55(c) and order the clerk to prepare and forward to us by way of supplemental transcript the court’s charge, the jury verdict, and judgment rendered on the verdict within thirty days of the date of this opinion. *See id.*at 55(c), 83. Upon receipt of the supplemental transcript, the case will be resubmitted for review without oral argument.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 82 (Friday, April 26, 1996)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 18511-18512]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10293]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 95-170; RM-8721; RM-8753]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Campton and Frenchburg, KY

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission, at the request of James P. Wagner, allots 
Channel 279A at Campton, Kentucky, as the community's first local aural 
transmission service (RM-8721). See 60 FR 58038, October 24, 1995. At 
the request of James P. Gray, we also dismiss the counterproposal 
proposing the allotment of Channel 279A at Frenchburg, Kentucky, as the 
community's first local aural transmission service (RM-8753). Channel 
279A can be allotted to Campton in compliance with the Commission's 
minimum distance separation requirements without the imposition of a 
site restriction. The coordinates for Channel 279A at Campton are North 
Latitude 37-44-06 and West Longitude 83-32-48. With this action, this 
proceeding is terminated.

DATES: Effective June 3, 1996. The window period for filing 
applications will open on June 3, 1996 and close on July 3, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sharon P. McDonald, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 95-170, adopted March 25, 1996, and 
released April 18, 1996. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW., Washington, 
DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractors, International Transcription Service, 
Inc., (202) 857-3800, 2100 M Street, NW., Suite 140, Washington, DC 
20037.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.


[[Page 18512]]


    Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: Sections 303, 48 Stat., as amended, 1082; 47 U.S.C. 
154, as amended.


Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Kentucky, is 
amended by adding Campton, Channel 279A.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 96-10293 Filed 4-25-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis Panel; HEAL Initiative RFA Review: Optimizing Multi-Component Service Delivery Interventions for OUD, Co-Occurring Conditions, and/or Suicide Risk.                    

*Date:*                         June 29, 2021.                    

*Time:*                         2:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Nicholas Gaiano, Ph.D., Review Branch Chief, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center/Room 6150/MSC 9606, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-9606, 301-443-2742,                         *nick.gaiano@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.242, Mental Health Research Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 3, 2021. 

Melanie J. Pantoja,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-11967 Filed 6-7-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the
"Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Robert P. Akins, Chief Executive Officer of
Cymer, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Registrant"), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



In Witness Whereof, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the 27th day of February, 2009.

/s/ ROBERT P. AKINS Robert P. Akins,Chief Executive Officer


This
certification accompanies the annual report on Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of Cymer, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date
of the annual report on Form 10-K to which it relates), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

---



QuickLinks
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

** **

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Alamo Group Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ronald A. Robinson,President & Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

-  The Form 10-K fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
-  The informationcontained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

| April 7, 2010 | /s/Ronald A. Robinson                                                 |
|---------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|          | Ronald A.  Robinson

President  & Chief Executive Officer

  |

** **
#### Troy L. STOVER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 52166.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Nov. 26, 1996.

Gary E. Brotherton, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Becky Owenson Kilpatrick, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before SPINDEN, P.J., and SMART and EDWIN H. SMITH, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Troy L. Stover appeals the dismissal of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. The circuit court ruled that the filing of Stover’s motion was untimely. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 107 (Monday, June 7, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 30331]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-11795]



[[Page 30331]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. 701-TA-437 and 731-TA-1060-1061 (Third Review)]


Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From China and India

Determinations

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
reviews, the United States International Trade Commission 
(``Commission'') determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the 
Act''), that revocation of the countervailing duty order on carbazole 
violet pigment 23 from India and the antidumping duty orders on 
carbazole violet pigment 23 from China and India would be likely to 
lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in 
the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in Sec.  207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted these reviews on October 1, 2020 (85 FR 
61977), and determined on January 4, 2021, that it would conduct 
expedited reviews (86 FR 24414, May 6, 2021).
    The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) 
of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its 
determinations in these reviews on June 1, 2021. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5201 (June 2021), 
entitled Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from China and India: 
Investigation Nos. 701-TA-437 and 731-TA-1060-1061 (Third Review).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: June 1, 2021.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2021-11795 Filed 6-4-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5271 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5271

 To amend section 3702 of title 10, United States Code, to reduce the 
dollar threshold for requiring certified cost and pricing data, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 25, 2023

 Mr. Deluzio introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend section 3702 of title 10, United States Code, to reduce the 
dollar threshold for requiring certified cost and pricing data, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDUCE THRESHOLD FOR CERTIFIED COST AND PRICING DATA.

    (a) In General.--Section 3702 of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by striking ``$2,000,000'' each place it 
                appears and inserting ``$750,000''; and
                    (B) in paragraph (1), by striking ``contract if'' 
                and all that follows and inserting the following: 
                ``contract if the price of the contract to the United 
                States is expected to exceed $750,000.''; and
            (2) by repealing subsection (f).
    (b) Modification of Prior Contracts.--Under subsection (a) of 3702 
of title 10, United States Code, in connection with a prime contract 
with respect to which such subsection applies and that was entered into 
before the date of the enactment of this Act, the head of the agency 
that entered into such contract shall modify the contract as soon as 
practicable to reflect paragraphs (2) and (3) of such subsection, as 
amended by subsection (a) of this Act, without requiring consideration.
    (c) Applicability.--The amendments made by subsection (a) of this 
Act to paragraph (1) of section 3702(a) of title 10, United States 
Code, shall apply only with respect to contracts entered into after the 
date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EX-4.3








Exhibit No. 4.3




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement on Form F-8
of our report dated February 24, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Boralex
Inc. (the “Corporation”) as at and for each of the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, which is
incorporated by reference in the offer to purchase and circular, dated May 18, 2010, to purchase
all of the outstanding trust units of Boralex Power Income Fund (the “Circular”) which forms part
of this Registration Statement on Form F-8. We also consent to the reference to us under the
heading “Experts” in the Circular, which forms part of this Registration Statement on Form F-8. We
also consent to the reference to us under the heading “Interests of Experts” in the Annual
Information Form incorporated by reference in the Circular which forms part of this Registration
Statement on Form F-8.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP




Montreal, Canada

May 18, 2010
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane lunani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J I AN Z HA NG , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , Jr ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 10- 70507 A ge nc yN o. A 099- 366- 341 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d June 15, 2011 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , O ’ S C A N N L A IN , an dF IS H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. Ji an Z hang , a nat i ve and ci t i ze n o f C hi na, pet i t i on s f or re vi ew of the B oard of I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ ( “ B I A ” ) or de rdi s m i s s i ng hi s appe a lf r om an i m m i gr a t i on ju d g e ’s d e c is io n d e n y in g h is m o tio n to r e o p e n r e m o v a l p r o c e e d in g s c o n du c te din abs e nt i a . W e have j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f orabus e of 

# FI LED JU N 21 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 70507 2 d i s c r e t i o n th e d e n i a lo f

am o t i o n t o r e o p e n , an dr e v i e w d e n o v o qu e s t i o n s o f l aw, in c lu d in g c la im s o f

du e p r o c e s s v io latio n s . H am azaspyan v. H

older , 590 F . 3d 744, 7 4 7 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 9 ) . We d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T he agency di d n otabuse i t s di sc re t i on i n d enyi ng Z hang ’ s m ot i on t o reopen w here Z hang fa i l ed t o est abl i sh exce pt i on alci rc um st ance s bey on d h i s c on trolthat w o u lde x c u s e h is f

a ilu r e to ap p e ara t h is h e ar in g . See 8 U . S . C . § 1 22 9a(e )( 1). T h e ag en cy d i dn o tv i o l at e du e p ro cess b y co n si d eri n g du e d i l i g en ce as a f a c to rin d e n y in g Z h an g ’s m o tio n to r e o p e n w h e r e th e B I A ’s p r e c e d e n t d e c is io n in M a tte ro f J -P- , 22 I. & N . D ec . 33 (B IA 19 98 ) ( en banc) putZ hang on no t i ce that th is f a c to rap p lie d . Cf

. Si n gh v . I

NS , 21 3 F . 3d10 50 , 10 53 (9th C i r. 20 00 ) ( B IA vi ol at es du e proces s by app l yi ng a “previ ou sl y unann ou nced evi dent i ary s tan d ar d ” ) . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

April 12, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6572

Apex Sourcing & Manufacturing: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_04.15.19.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel