alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 1, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 19313]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10680]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs


Receipt of Petition for Federal Acknowledgment of Existence as an 
Indian Tribe

    This is published in the exercise of authority delegated by the 
Secretary of the Interior to the Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs by 
209 DM 8.
    Pursuant to 25 CFR 83.9(a) (formerly 25 CFR 54.8(a)) notice is 
hereby given that the Apalachee Indian Tribe, 220 Stovall Road, 
Alexandria, Louisiana 71303, has filed a petition for acknowledgment by 
the Secretary of the Interior that the group exists as an Indian tribe. 
The petition was received by the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) on 
January 22, 1996, and was signed by members of the group's governing 
body.
    This is a notice of receipt of petition and does not constitute 
notice that the petition is under active consideration. Notice of 
active consideration will be sent by mail to the petitioner and other 
interested parties at the appropriate time.
    Under Section 83.9(a) (formerly 54.8(d)) of the Federal 
regulations, interested parties may submit factual and/or legal 
arguments in support of or in opposition to the group's petition. Any 
information submitted will be made available on the same basis as other 
information in the BIA's files. Such submissions will be provided to 
the petitioner upon receipt by the BIA. The petitioner will be provided 
an opportunity to respond to such submissions prior to a final 
determination regarding the petitioner's status.
    The petition may be examined, by appointment, in the Department of 
the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Branch of Acknowledgment and 
Research, Room 1362-MIB, 1849 C Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20240, 
Phone: (202) 208-3592.

    Dated: February 29, 1996.
Ada E. Deer,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 96-10680 Filed 4-30-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-02-P
EXHIBIT NUMBER 4.54




                         AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN
                           THE COMPANY AND SEAN HURD
                              DATED JUNE 10, 2002





















                                                                             145

<PAGE>




IMA EXPLORATION INC.






June 10,2002


Mr. Sean Hurd
101 - 2028 W. 11th Ave.
Vancouver, B.C. V6J 2C9



Dear Sean:

Please  accept this letter to confirm that your  contract with the Company dated
June  11,2001  to expire  June  10,2002  will be  extended  under the same terms
currently in place and will be reviewed annually.

If you are in agreement please sign below.


Yours truly,


/s/ Nikolaos Cacos

IMA EXPLORATION INC.
Mr. Nikolaos Cacos
Corporate Secretary


I have read the above letter and agree to the terms as outlined.


/s/ Sean Hurd                                                 June 10-02
------------------------                                      -----------------
Sean Hurd                                                     Date



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Terminal City Club Tower, Suite709-837 West Hastings Street,
                         Vancouver, BC, Canada V6C 3N6
           Tel: 604.687.1828 Fax: 604.687.1858 Toll Free: 800.901.0058
        www.imaexploration.com E-Mail: info@imaexploration.com TSX-V: IMR

                                                                             146
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of First State Bancorporation, a New
Mexico corporation (the Company), for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Christopher C. Spencer, as Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to First State Bancorporation and will be retained by First
State Bancorporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                                                                                   
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Christopher C. Spencer                                                         
|Christopher C. Spencer                                                             
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, and
Principal Accounting Officer
|March 16, 2006                                                                     

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
POWER OF ATTORNEY

Each person whose signature appears below hereby authorizes Terry L. Robinson or
Thomas F. Malloy and either of them, as attorney-in-fact,  to sign in his or her
behalf,  individually and in each capacity stated below, and to file this Annual
Report on Form 10- KSB and all amendments  and/or  supplements to this file this
Annual Report on Form 10- KSB

Signature                      Title                                  Date

/s/Thomas N. Gavin             Director                           March 25, 2002
--------------------------
Thomas N. Gavin

/s/David B. Gaw                Director                           March 25, 2002
--------------------------
David B. Gaw

/s/Fred J. Hearn Jr.           Director                           March 25, 2002
--------------------------
Fred J. Hearn Jr.

/s/Conrad W. Hewitt            Director                           March 25, 2002
--------------------------
Conrad W. Hewitt

/s/Harlan R. Kurtz             Director                           March 25, 2002
--------------------------
Harlan R. Kurtz

/s/Richard S. Long             Director                           March 25, 2002
--------------------------
Richard S. Long

/s/Thomas H. Lowenstein        Director                           March 25, 2002
--------------------------
Thomas H. Lowenstein

/s/Thomas F. Malloy            Director and                       March 25, 2002
--------------------------     Chairman of the Board
Thomas F. Malloy

/s/Terry L. Robinson           President, Chief                   March 25, 2002
--------------------------     Executive Officer and Director
Terry L. Robinson              (Principal Executive Officer)

/s/James E. Tidgewell          Director                           March 25, 2002
--------------------------
James E. Tidgewell

/s/Lee-Ann Cimino              Sr. Vice President                 March 25, 2002
--------------------------     Chief Financial Officer
Lee-Ann Cimino                 (Principal Financial Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Investigation Nos. 701-TA-521 and 731-TA-1252-1255 and 1257 (Review)]

## Determinations

                    On the basis of the record [1]                                          developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (“Commission”) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (“the Act”), that revocation of the countervailing duty order on steel nails from Vietnam and the antidumping duty orders on steel nails from Korea, Malaysia, Oman, Taiwan, and Vietnam would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.                

## Background

The Commission instituted these reviews on June 1, 2020 (85 FR 33195) and determined on September 4, 2020 that it would conduct expedited reviews (86 FR 26545, May 14, 2021).

                    The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its determinations in these reviews on May 28, 2021. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5200 (May 2021), entitled                     *Steel Nails from Korea, Malaysia, Oman, Taiwan, and Vietnam: Investigation Nos. 701-TA-521 and 731-TA-1252-1255 and 1257 (Review).*

By order of the Commission.

Issued: May 28, 2021.

Lisa Barton,

Secretary to the Commission.

# Footnotes

1.                             The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2021-11703 Filed 6-2-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the quarterly report of Brooklyn Federal Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael Trinidad, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:  June 27, 2011




/s/  Michael TrinidadMichael TrinidadSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of Brooklyn Federal Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending December 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Richard A. Kielty, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


Date:  February 14, 2006

/s/ Richard A. Kielty
--------------------------------------
Richard A. Kielty
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




                                       24
#### Mike B. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 50959.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Nov. 14, 1995.

Susan L. Hogan, Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., and Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

Before ELLIS, P.J., and HANNA and SPINDEN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from the denial of a Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Pursuant to5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , th e co urt has determined that this opinionsho uld not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except und er the limit ed circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE U NI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 41110 C onfer enc e Cal endar
UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee
v. ER I CA PER EZ D e fe nda nt
- Appe l l ant

A pp eal f

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e S ou t h ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SDC N o . 2 : 0 8
- CR- 3 1 1
- ALL
B ef ore SM ITH , B E N AV ID E S , an d H AY N E S , C i rcui t Ju dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * Th e Feder alPu bl i c D ef enderapp oin ted t o r epr es ent E r i c a Per ez has
m o ve d f o r l e av e t o w i t hdr aw a nd has f i l e d a b r i e f

i n a c c o r da nc e w i t h A nder s v. C a lif o rn ia , 38 6 U
. S. 73 8 ( 19 67 )
. Per e z has no t f i l e d a r e s po ns e . Our i nde pe nde nt r e vi e w o f t he r e c o r d a nd c o uns e l ’ s b r i e f di s c l o s e s no no nf

r i vo l o us is s u e fo r a p p e a l. A c c o r d i n g ly , co u n s e l’ s m o tio n fo r le a v e to w ith d r a w is GRANTED, c o u n s e l i s e x c u s e d f r o m f u r t h e r r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a nd t he A P P E A L IS D IS M IS S E D
. S ee 5 T H C IR . R. 42. 2. United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D June 16, 2 009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk
| | PricewaterhouseCoopers Audit63, rue de Villiers92208 Neuilly-sur-Seine CedexTéléphone 01 56 57 58 59Fax 01 56 57 58 60
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8(Nos. 333-152695, 333-145265, 333-136679, 333-128450, 333-118107, 333-118105, 333-118103, 333-109227, 333-104438, 333-99083, 333-91900, 333-75600, 333-70516, 333-12088,333-9212, 333-08910 and 333-12944) of AXA of our report dated March 26, 2009 relating to theconsolidated financial statements, financial statement schedule and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 20-F.

PricewaterhouseCoopers Audit

Michael P. Nelligan                                                         Eric Dupont

Neuilly-sur-Seine, FranceMarch 27, 2009





Société d'expertise comptable inscrite au tableau de l'ordre de Paris - Ile de France  Strasbourg - Alsace  Lille - Nord Pas de Calais Lorraine  Lyon - Rhônes Alpes  Provence - Côte d'Azur - Corse  Pays de Loire  Rouen - Normandie  Toulouse - Midi Pyrénées.Société de commissariat aux comptes membre de la compagnie régionale de Versailles. Bureaux : Grenoble, Lille, Lyon, Marseille,Metz, Mulhouse, Nantes, Neuilly-sur-Seine, Rouen, Sophia Antipolis, Strasbourg, Toulouse.Société Anonyme au capital de 2 510 460 . RCS Nanterre B 672 006 483 - code APE 741 C - TVA n° FR 76 672 006 483Siret 672 006 483 00362 - Siège social : 63, rue de Villiers 92208 Neuilly-sur-Seine cedex.
#### Tammy THOMPSON, Claimant/Appellant, v. ALLIED HEALTHCARE PRODUCTS, Employer/Respondent.

No. 67266.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

Oct. 3, 1995.

Bradford C. Emert, Emert & Spooner, P.C., Clayton, for appellant.

Stephen G. Klaudis, Law Offices of Marc A Lapp, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before AHRENS, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and GRIMM, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying appellant’s hardship application for workers’ compensation benefits. We have reviewed the entire record and find no error. An extended written opinion would have no jurisprudential value. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the accompanying amended Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of UniversalFog Inc. for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2006, I, Tom Bontems, Chief ExecutiveOfficer and Chief Financial Officer of Universal Fog Inc. hereby certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

 
| 1.     | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                      |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
| 2.     | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Universal Fog Inc. |

 
| By:    | */s/*   *Tom Bontems*

Tom BontemsChief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer |
|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                  |                                                                                                                                       |

 
| Dated:  September 14, 2006 |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Robert Wayne CRAIG, Appellant.

No. WD 40338.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Aug. 22, 1989.

Nancy A. McKerrow, Columbia, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Debra M. Miles, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before SHANGLER, P.J., and TURNAGE and KENNEDY, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from conviction of rape, robbery in the first degree, burglary in the first degree, and armed criminal action, and from denial of appellant’s Rule 29.15 motion.

Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 13

- 00522

- CR

Michael Manahan, Jr.

On Appeal from the 130th District Court of Matagorda County , Texas

Trial Cause No. 12

- 164

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, conclude s that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed as modified by
this Court . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.
We further order this decision certified below for observance.

June 19, 2014
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(CHAPTER 63, TITLE 18 U.S.C. §1350(a) AND (b))



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. §1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby individually
certifies in his capacity as an officer of U.S.I. Holdings Corporation (the Company) that the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of and for the periods covered by such Report.



|                      |  |  |  |                                            
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 12, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/    ROBERT S. SCHNEIDER                 
|                      |  |  |  |                                            
|                      |  |  |  | Robert S. Schneider Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. §1350(a) and (b)) and is, to the extent permitted by law, provided by the above signatory to the extent of his
respective knowledge.



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
U.S.I. Holdings Corporation and will be retained by U.S.I. Holdings Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Tina HILL (Deceased), Appellant, v. RYDER SERVICES CORPORATION, Respondent.

No. WD 48902.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Aug. 30, 1994.

Leland F. Dempsey, Kansas City, for appellant.

*343Brian J. Fowler, Kansas City, for respondent.

Before ELLIS, P.J., and BERREY and SMART, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Tina Hill’s dependent children appeal a decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying their derivative claim for workers’ compensation benefits.

The decision is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
#### In the Matter of Edward Beddow, Appellant, v Lynn Beddow, Respondent.

In a visitation proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Joseph, J.), dated December 22,1988, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

At the time of the commencement of this visitation proceeding by the petitioner father in December 1988, Maine was the "home state” of the subject children since they had been continuously residing in that State with their mother since July 1987 (Domestic Relations Law § 75-c [5]; § 75-d [1] [a]). The father currently resides in New Jersey and has done so since 1985. While this State had jurisdiction of the original custody proceeding, its jurisdiction cannot be continued since it is no longer the residence of the children or of either of the contestants *(see,*28 USC § 1738A [d]). Maine therefore has jurisdiction to determine this visitation issue and there is no evidence that it has declined to exercise jurisdiction.

This State cannot assume jurisdiction pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 75-d (1) (b). Contrary to the father’s contention, although the marital domicile was in New York and the children were born and lived in New York, a "significant connection” with this State cannot be established because a new "home state” and alternative jurisdiction has now been established in Maine *(see,*Domestic Relations Law § 75-d [1] [b]; 28 USC § 1738A [c] [2] [B]; US Const, art VI, § 2; *Matter of Michael P. v Diana G.,*156 AD2d 59).

Finally, the father’s contention that New York is a more convenient forum is not sufficient to confer jurisdiction on a court of this State. Thompson, J. P., Rubin, Eiber and Miller, JJ., concur.