alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**XHIBIT      32(b)**

| 1) |   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2) |   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                 |   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|  BY:              /s/ David C. Stuebe                           |   |
|                  David C.                Stuebe                 |   |   |
| Vice                President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer |   |   |
| (Principal                Financial Officer)                         |   |   |

----
Order entered July 1, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01516-CR

No. 05-12-01517-CR

KELLY MACK LAMBETH, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 219-80060-2012, 219-80495-2012

ORDER

On May 9, 2013, this Court ordered appellant to file his brief in these appeals by June 14, 

2013. To date, appellant has neither filed his brief nor communicated with the Court regarding 

the status of the brief. We have already adopted a finding that appellant s indigent and is 

represented by court-appointed counsel.

Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to file his brief by JULY 15, 2013. If appellant’s 

brief is not filed by the date specified, we will order Tim Avery removed as appellant’s 

appointed attorney and will order the trial court to appoint new counsel to represent appellant in 

the appeals.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to 

counsel for all parties.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 84 (Tuesday, April 30, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 19061]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10605]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. Once the notices have been accepted for 
processing, they will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later 
than May 15, 1996.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (Genie D. Short, Vice President) 
2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Donald R. Grobowsky, Temple, Texas; to acquire an additional 
18.79 percent, for a total of 28.78 percent of the voting shares of 
Central Community Corporation, Temple, Texas, and thereby indirectly 
acquire First State Bank, Temple, Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 24, 
1996.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 96-10605 Filed 4-29-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              550
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,610
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,610)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,610)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,610)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00


</TABLE>
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION

(pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2005 of Acergy S.A. (the Company) as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) on the date
hereof (the Report) and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Tom Ehret, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                  |  |                                  
|----------------- |  | ---------------------------------
|Date: May 8, 2006 |  | /S/ TOM EHRET                    
|                  |  | Tom Ehret Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Acergy S.A. and will be retained by Acergy S.A. and furnished to the Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Investigation Nos. 701-TA-437 and 731-TA-1060-1061 (Third Review)]

      ( print page 30331)    

## Determinations

                    On the basis of the record [1]                                          developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (“Commission”) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (“the Act”), that revocation of the countervailing duty order on carbazole violet pigment 23 from India and the antidumping duty orders on carbazole violet pigment 23 from China and India would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.                

## Background

The Commission instituted these reviews on October 1, 2020 (85 FR 61977), and determined on January 4, 2021, that it would conduct expedited reviews (86 FR 24414, May 6, 2021).

                    The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its determinations in these reviews on June 1, 2021. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5201 (June 2021), entitled                     *Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from China and India: Investigation Nos. 701-TA-437 and 731-TA-1060-1061 (Third Review).*

By order of the Commission.

Issued: June 1, 2021.

Lisa Barton,

Secretary to the Commission.

# Footnotes

1.                             The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2021-11795 Filed 6-4-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5408 

To amend title XVI of the Social Security Act to update the resource limit 

for supplemental security income eligibility. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 12, 2023 

Mr. HIGGINS of New York (for himself and Mr. FITZPATRICK) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title XVI of the Social Security Act to update 

the resource limit for supplemental security income eligibility. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘SSI Savings Penalty 

5 Elimination Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. UPDATE IN ELIGIBILITY FOR THE SUPPLEMENTAL 

7 SECURITY INCOME PROGRAM. 

8 (a) UPDATE IN RESOURCE LIMIT FOR INDIVIDUALS

9 AND COUPLES.—Section 1611(a)(3) of such Act (42 

10 U.S.C. 1382(a)(3)) is amended— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5408 IH

1 (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘$2,250’’ 

2 and all that follows through the end of the subpara3 graph and inserting ‘‘$20,000 in calendar year 

4 2023, and shall be increased as described in section 

5 1617(d) for each subsequent calendar year.’’; and 

6 (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘$1,500’’ 

7 and all that follows through the end of the subpara8 graph and inserting ‘‘$10,000 in calendar year 

9 2023, and shall be increased as described in section 

10 1617(d) for each subsequent calendar year.’’. 

11 (b) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.—Section 1617 of such 

12 Act (42 U.S.C. 1382f) is amended— 

13 (1) in the section heading, by inserting ‘‘; IN14 FLATION ADJUSTMENT’’ after ‘‘BENEFITS’’; and 

15 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

16 ‘‘(d) In the case of any calendar year after 2023, each 

17 of the amounts specified in section 1611(a)(3) shall be in18 creased by multiplying each such amount by the quotient 

19 (not less than 1) obtained by dividing— 

20 ‘‘(1) the average of the consumer price index 

21 for all urban consumers (all items; United States 

22 city average, as published by the Bureau of Labor 

23 Statistics of the Department of Labor) for the 12- 

24 month period ending with September of the pre25 ceding calendar year, by 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 5408 IH

1 ‘‘(2) such average for the 12-month period end2 ing with September 2022.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FSP Galleria North Corp. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Barbara J. Fournier, Chief Operating Officer and principal financial officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to her knowledge:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










Date:  August 12, 2010
/s/ Barbara J. FournierBarbara J. FournierChief Operating Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
EXHIBIT 10.31

March 15, 2002

|    |  |                                                 
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------
|Re: |  | Long-Term Stay-On Performance Incentive Payment.

Dear Lorenzo:

This
letter (the "Agreement") sets forth the terms and conditions pursuant to which Station Casinos, Inc. (the
"Company") has decided to award you a Long-Term Stay-On Performance Incentive Payment (the "LTSO
Payment").

---



| |  | STATION CASINOS, INC.,a Nevada corporation
| |  | ------------------------------------------
| |  |                                           
| |  | By:                                       
| |  |                                           

By signing below, you hereby acknowledge and agree to all of the foregoing terms and conditions of this Agreement.

|Agreed to and Accepted By: |  | 
|-------------------------- |  | 
|                           |  | 
|Lorenzo J. Fertitta        |  | 

2

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 23.1

Independent Auditors' Consent

The
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Caldera International, Inc.:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.s 333-43822, 333-97865, and 333-100105 on Form S-8 and
Registration Statement No. 333-65658 on Form S-3 of Caldera International, Inc. of our report dated January 27, 2003, with respect to the
consolidated balance sheet of Caldera International, Inc. and subsidiaries as of October 31, 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss,
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year then ended, and the related financial statement schedule, which report appears in the October 31, 2002 Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Caldera International, Inc.

The
October 31, 2001 and 2000 consolidated financial statements of Caldera International, Inc. and subsidiaries were audited by other auditors who have ceased operations.
Our report dated January 27, 2003, refers to our audit of the transitional disclosures required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets, which was adopted by the Company as of November 1, 2001, and of the adjustments that were applied to retroactively reflect a one-for-four reverse stock split of
the Company's common stock approved on March 4, 2002. However, we were not engaged to audit, review, or apply any procedures to the October 31, 2001 and 2000 consolidated financial
statements of Caldera International, Inc. and subsidiaries other than with respect to such disclosures and adjustments and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or any form of assurance on
the October 31, 2001 and 2000 consolidated financial statements taken as a whole.

/s/
KPMG LLP

Salt
Lake City, Utah
January 27, 2003

---

QuickLinks
----

|                                                                    |   | Three Months Ended |       |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------|------------|
|                                                                    |   | March 31, 2011     |       |   | March 31, 2010 |   |
|                                                                    |   |               |       |   |   |   |
| Net Loss                                                                |   | $                  | (2,463     | ) |   | $ | (5,951 | ) |
| Weighted average common shares outstanding for computation of basic EPS |   |               | 12,653,133 |   |   |   | 12,625,968 |   |
| Dilutive common-equivalent shares                                       |   |               | --         |   |   |   | -- |   |
| Weighted average common shares for computation of diluted EPS           |   |               | 12,653,133 |   |   |   | 12,625,968 |   |
|                                                                    |   |               |       |   |   |   |   |   |
| Loss per common share:                                                  |   |               |       |   |   |   |   |   |
| Basic                                                                   |   | $                  | (0.19      | ) |   | $ | (0.47 | ) |
| Diluted                                                                 |   | $                  | (0.19      | ) |   | $ | (0.47 | ) |
|                                                                    |   |               |       |   |   |   |   |   |
|                                                                    |   | Six Months Ended   |       |
|                                                                    |   | March 31, 2011     |       |   | March 31, 2010 |   |
|                                                                    |   |               |       |   |   |   |   |   |
| Net Loss                                                                |   | $                  | (5,734     | ) |   | $ | (11,038 | ) |
| Weighted average common shares outstanding for computation of basic EPS |   |               | 12,646,830 |   |   |   | 12,619,455 |   |
| Dilutive common-equivalent shares                                       |   |               | --         |   |   |   | 2,918 |   |
| Weighted average common shares for computation of diluted EPS           |   |               | 12,646,830 |   |   |   | 12,622,373 |   |
|                                                                    |   |               |       |   |   |   |   |   |
| Loss per common share:                                                  |   |               |       |   |   |   |   |   |
| Basic                                                                   |   | $                  | (0.45      | ) |   | $ | (0.87 | ) |
| Diluted                                                                 |   | $                  | (0.45      | ) |   | $ | (0.87 | ) |
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Billy Don Gardner, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Lawrence, J.), rendered April 19, 1984, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree (two counts) and assault in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the Trial Judge erred in ruling, pursuant to his offer of evidence, that testimony by the defendant’s sister concerning statements he made to her pertaining to his role in the acts charged was inadmissible. Insofar as the precluded testimony constituted inadmissible hearsay which did not fall into any of the exceptions to the rule excluding hearsay generally, we find that the Trial Judge’s ruling was proper.

The defendant also contends that the judgment appealed from should be reversed on the ground that the prosecutor impermissibly withheld from the defense the Grand Jury testimony of the defendant’s sister, which the defendant contends was a wrongful denial of both *Rosario*material *(see, People v Rosario,*9 NY2d 286, *cert denied*368 US 866) and *Brady*material *(see, Brady v Maryland,*373 US 83).

However, the People represented that they had no intention of calling the defendant’s sister as a witness for the prosecution. In fact, the defendant’s sister was not called by the People to testify at trial. Thus, the Grand Jury testimony of the defendant’s sister was not *Rosario*material *(see,*CPL 240.45 [1] [a]) and the defendant was not entitled to production of the minutes on this ground. Furthermore, with respect to the purported *Brady*violation, since the defendant’s sister was known to the defense and was, in fact, called as a defense witness, the defense was fully able to "take advantage of any exculpatory testimony that [she] might furnish” *(United States v Stewart,*513 F2d 957, 960). Therefore, there has been no *Brady*violation.

We have considered the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Mangano, P. J., Lawrence, Balletta and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
extendone.htm




10(D)(1)


 


AMENDMENT NO. 1


 


to the


 


SERVOTRONICS, INC.


 


2000 EMPLOYEES STOCK OPTION PLAN


 


WHEREAS, Servotronics, Inc. (the “Company”), established the Servotronics, Inc. 2000 Employees Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”), and


 


WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company reserved the right to amend the Plan at any time, provided the amendment does not adversely affect any right of any holder of an option already granted without such optionee’s consent; and


 


WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has approved the amendment of the Plan set forth below.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows:


 


1. Section 6 of the Plan is hereby amended by adding to the end thereof a new subsection (j), as follows:


 


j.           Each Key Employee to whom a non-qualified stock option is granted pursuant to this Plan may, in the Optionee's sole discretion, offer to surrender to the Company some or all of such Options that are currently exercisable in exchange for a payment by Company check not exceeding the aggregate current Fair Market Value of the shares of the Company's Common Stock which would have been issuable upon the exercise of the Options offered for surrender, less the aggregate exercise price of such Options plus a single transaction fee of $350.  The Company, in its sole discretion, may accept or reject the Optionee's offer.  The Chief Executive Officer of the Company, or any person to whom he delegates this authority, is authorized on behalf of the Company, to accept or reject the Optionee's offer in his or her sole discretion.  If the Company does not accept the Optionee's offer, the Optionee will retain such Options, which will remain exercisable according to their terms and, before expiration, may again be offered by the Optionee at the Optionee's discretion for surrender to the Company by Optionee (if not previously exercised) in accordance with the preceding provisions of this subsection (j).”


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this amendment to be executed as of February 22, 2010.


 


 




	 	SERVOTRONICS, INC.	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 /s/ Dr. Nicholas D. Trbovich, President	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
By: 

	Dr. Nicholas D. Trbovich	 
	 	 	President