alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of James K. Patrick, III, Respondent, v Veronica Gil, Appellant.

Yesawich, Jr., J.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Albany County (Flaherty, H.E.), entered July 28, 1989, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, to direct respondent to pay support for her children.

Petitioner, alleging that respondent had not provided fair and reasonable support for the parties’ two children, filed a petition for support pursuant to Family Court Act article 4 seeking to have respondent share the costs of their son’s college education. This request was expanded during the hearing which followed to include the cost of the parties’ daughter to attend a private high school *(see,*Family Ct Act §461 [a]; §466 [a]).

The parties were divorced pursuant to a judgment which incorporated but did not merge therein a previously executed separation agreement. That agreement originally, and as later modified, makes no reference to the children’s college or private high school education or to respondent’s obligation to contribute to their support for any other purpose. After a prolonged litigated history, the Hearing Examiner ordered respondent to pay $42 per week child support effective October 27, 1987 and arrearages in the amount of $3,486. Respondent appeals.

Because respondent failed to submit timely specific written objections to the Hearing Examiner’s final order of support, *849however, appellate review is precluded (Family Ct Act § 439 [e]; *see, e.g., Matter of O’Brien v O’Brien,*156 AD2d 778; *Matter of Menaldino v Mark UU.,*141 AD2d 265, 267).

Appeal dismissed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Yesawich, Jr., Levine and Mercure, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002







In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FSP Galleria North Corp.
(the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned,
George J. Carter, President and principal executive officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to his
knowledge:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.









Date:  May
      8, 2009
            /s/ George J.
      Carter
              George
      J. Carter
              President
              (Principal Executive
      Officer)
#### Linda M. SKINNER, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Thomas D. SKINNER, Respondent/Appellant.

No. 68377.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

May 7, 1996.

Daniel E. Leslie, Union, for appellant.

Gael Davis Wood, James W. McGettigan, Jr., Washington, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL, and GRIMM, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to Rule 74.06(b), husband filed a motion to set aside the judgment dissolving his marriage. The trial court denied the motion and husband appeals. We affirm.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF STATION CASINOS, INC.

Palace Station Hotel & Casino, Inc.
Boulder Station, Inc.
Texas Station, LLC
Sunset Station, Inc.
Santa Fe Station, Inc.
Fiesta Station, Inc.
Rancho Station, LLC
Lake Mead Station, Inc.
Tropicana Station, Inc.
Charleston Station, LLC
Magic Star Station, LLC
Gold Rush Station, LLC
LML Station, LLC
Palms Station, LLC:
    Fiesta Palms, LLC (6.7% ownership)
    Palms Place, LLC (6.7% ownership)
    Palms Place II, LLC (6.7% ownership)
Green Valley Station, Inc.:
    Town Center Amusements, Inc. d/b/a Barley's Casino & Brewing Company (50% ownership)
    Greens Café, LLC d/b/a The Greens (50% ownership)
    Sunset GV, LLC (50% ownership)
GV Ranch Station, Inc.:
    GV Ranch Station Capital Holdings, LLC
    Green Valley Ranch Gaming, LLC (50% ownership)
Aliante Station, LLC:
    Aliante Holding, LLC (50% ownership)
                Aliante Gaming, LLC
                Losee Elkhorn Properties, LLC
Durango Station, Inc.
    Front Street Station, LLC
Inspirada Station, LLC
FCP Mezzco Parent, LLC:
    FCP Mezzco Parent Sub, LLC:
                FCP Mezzco Borrower VII, LLC:
                                FCP MezzCo Borrower VI, LLC:
                                         
       FCP MezzCo Borrower V, LLC:
                                         
                       FCP MezzCo Borrower IV, LLC:
                                         
                                       FCP MezzCo Borrwer
III, LLC:
                                         
                                          
             FCP MezzCo Borrower II, LLC:
                                         
                                          
                             FCP Mezzco Borrower I, LLC:
                                         
                                          
                                          
   FCP PropCo, LLC

CV HoldCo, LLC:
    CV PropCo, LLC
SC Rancho Development, LLC:
    Rancho Road, LLC (50% ownership):
Station Holdings, Inc:
    Town Center Station, LLC
Vista Holdings, LLC
Centerline Holdings, LLC
Station California, LLC
Station Construction, LLC
Northern NV Acquisitions, LLC
Reno Land Holdings, LLC
Tropicana Acquisitions, LLC
Auburn Development, LLC
SC Butte Development, LLC
SC Sonoma Development, LLC
Sonoma Land Holdings, LLC
Sonoma Land Acquisition Company, LLC
Fresno Land Acquisitions, LLC
SC Michigan, LLC:
    MPM Enterprises, LLC (50% ownership)

---



QuickLinks
#### John E. GLASSCOCK, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 69597.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

Nov. 12, 1996.

Raymund J. Capelovitch, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for respondent.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, David R. Truman, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for movant-appel-lant.

KAROHL, Judge.

On June 24, 1993, movant entered a guilty plea to one count of forgery, uttering as genuine, a class C felony in violation of § 570.090.1(4) RSMo 1986. The court suspended imposition of sentence for a period of two years. On November 17,1994, the court revoked probation and sentenced defendant to serve a five-year term of imprisonment. On January 17, 1995, defendant filed a Rule 24.035 motion which the motion court dismissed without an evidentiary hearing.

When the trial court imposed the five-year sentence, it directed the sentence was to be served concurrently with an unrelated sentence and granted defendant credit for all jail time served. The subject of defendant’s Rule 24.035 motion is a claim of error in denying relief “because the record does not refute appellant’s allegations that his sentence does not reflect the jail time credit to which he is entitled.” The point on appeal does not contend his guilty plea was involuntary because of uncertainty in defining the amount of time to which he was entitled for jail time served. The relief he seeks is ministerial, not legal.

Accordingly, the motion court properly dismissed the motion because the claim for jail time credit is not cognizable under Rule 24.035. *Murphy v. State,*873 S.W.2d 231, 232 (Mo. banc 1994). Defendant’s relief must come from the executive branch of Department of Corrections.

We affirm.

RHODES RUSSELL, P.J., and SIMON, J., concur.
EXHIBIT 23

                             CONSENT OF KPMG LLP AS

                  INDEPENDENT RESGISTED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

                             FOR NORTH BAY BANCORP

<PAGE>

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERD PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors
North Bay Bancorp:


We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  registration  statements
(Nos.  333-93537,  333-43972 and  333-90006) on Form S-8 of North Bay Bancorp of
our reports  dated March 15,  2006,  with  respect to the  consolidated  balance
sheets of North Bay Bancorp and  subsidiaries  as of December  31, 2005 and 2004
and the related  consolidated  statements of operations,  comprehensive  income,
changes  in  shareholders'  equity,  and cash flows for each of the years in the
three year period  ended  December  31,  2005,  management's  assessment  of the
effectiveness  of internal  control over financial  reporting as of December 31,
2005, and the  effectiveness of internal control over financial  reporting as of
December 31, 2005, which reports appear in the December 31, 2005,  annual report
on Form 10-K of North Bay Bancorp.



/s/ KPMG LLP
------------

San Francisco, California
March 15, 2006
EXHIBIT 25





POWER OF ATTORNEY



---

POWER OF ATTORNEY



Each person whose signature appears below hereby authorizes Terry L. Robinson or David B. Gaw and either of them, as attorney-in-fact, to sign in his or her behalf, individually and in each capacity stated below, and to file this Annual Report on Form 10- K and all amendments and/or supplements to this Annual Report on Form 10- K





Signature

Title

Date



/s/Thomas N. Gavin

Thomas N. Gavin

Director

March 5, 2007





/s/David B. Gaw

Director and

March 5, 2007

David B. Gaw

Chairman of the Board





/s/Fred J. Hearn Jr.

Fred J. Hearn Jr.

Director

March 5, 2007





/s/Richard S. Long

Director and

March 5, 2007

Richard S. Long

Vice Chairman of the Board





/s/Thomas F. Malloy

Director

March 5, 2007

Thomas F. Malloy





/s/Terry L. Robinson

President, Chief

March 5, 2007

Terry L. Robinson

Chief Executive Officer and Director

(Principal Executive Officer)



/s/Dennis G. Schmal

Director

March 5, 2007

Dennis G. Schmal





/s/Thomas H. Shelton

Director

March 5, 2007

Thomas H. Shelton

.





/s/Stephen C. Spencer

Director

March 5, 2007

Stephen C. Spencer





/s/Denise C. Suihkonen

Director

March 5, 2007

Denise C. Suihkonen





/s/James E. Tidgewell

Director

March 5, 2007

James E. Tidgewell



---



/s/Gary C. Wallace

Director

March 5, 2007

Gary C. Wallace





/s/Michael W. Wengel

Executive Vice President

March 5, 2007

Michael W. Wengel

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 67 (Friday, April 7, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 17769-17770]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8627]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 17770]]

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

49 CFR Part 234

[FRA Docket No. RSGC-6; Notice No. 2]
RIN 2130-AA92


Selection and Installation of Grade Crossing Warning Systems; 
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Change of hearing date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On March 2, 1995, FRA published in the Federal Register a 
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) (60 FR 11649) regarding the 
selection and installation of grade crossing warning systems. A public 
hearing was scheduled for May 9, 1995.
    Due to scheduling constraints, FRA must change the date of the 
public hearing. As a consequence, FRA is rescheduling the public 
hearing to April 24, 1995. The hearing location remains the same and 
will be held in room 2230 of the Nassif Building, DOT Headquarters 
Building, 400 Seventh Street, S.W., Washington, DC. We apologize for 
any inconvenience this rescheduling may cause.

DATES: A public hearing will be held at 9:30 a.m. on April 24, 1995.

ADDRESSES: A public hearing will be held in room 2230 of the Nassif 
Building, 400 Seventh Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. Persons desiring 
to speak at the hearing should notify the Docket Clerk by telephone 
(202-366-0628) or by writing to the Docket Clerk at the address above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bruce F. George, Chief, Highway-Rail Crossing and Trespasser Programs 
Division, Office of Safety, FRA, 400 Seventh Street, S.W., Washington, 
D.C. 20590 (telephone 202-366-0533), or Mark Tessler, Trial Attorney, 
Office of Chief Counsel, FRA, 400 Seventh Street, S.W., Washington, 
D.C. 20590 (telephone 202-366-0628).

    Issued in Washington, DC on March 31, 1995.
Donald M. Itzkoff,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 95-8627 Filed 4-6-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-M
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of W.  S.  INDUSTRIES,  INC.  (the
"COMPANY") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending  November 30, 2007 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "REPORT"),  I,
James  F.  Dempsey,  Chief  Financial  Officer,  respectively,  of THE  COMPANY,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of THE COMPANY.

Date:  January 9, 2008

                                             By: /s/ JAMES F. DEMPSEY
                                                 -----------------------
                                                 James F. Dempsey
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 81 (Thursday, April 25, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 18388]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10137]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP96-313-000]

Williams Natural Gas Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

April 19, 1996
    Take notice that on April 12, 1996, Williams Natural Gas Company 
(Williams), P.O. Box 3288, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74101, filed in Docket No. 
CP96-313-000 a request pursuant to Section 157.205 and 157.212 of the 
Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205 and 
157.212) for authorization to operate in interstate commerce certain 
facilities that were previously constructed and operated to effectuate 
transportation service pursuant to Section 311 of the Natural Gas 
Policy Act (NGPA). Williams makes such request, under its blanket 
certificate issued in Docket No. CP82-479-000 pursuant to Section 7 of 
the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set forth in the request on file 
with the Commission and open to public inspection.
    Specifically, Williams is proposing to use a delivery facility that 
was installed in Mitchell County, Kansas, for purposes other than 
Section 311 transport. It is stated that the subject facilities were 
constructed to enable Williams to perform NGPA Section 311 
transportation to Western Resources, Inc. (WRI) for use by Plum Creek 
Farms (Plum Creek). The Section 311 facilities consist of a 2-inch tap, 
metering, regulating and appurtenant facilities. Williams states that 
it commenced gas delivery to WRI for Plum Creek on December 14, 1995. 
Williams states that the volumes of gas that will be delivered to WRI 
for Plum Creek, after approval of the request herein, will not exceed 
WRI's existing entitlements.
    Williams declares that such a change in facility use is not 
prohibited by its existing tariff, and that Williams has sufficient 
capacity to accomplish the delivery specified without detriment or 
disadvantage to its other customers. It is stated that WRI reimbursed 
Williams the $4,451 construction cost of the subject facilities.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene a notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protests filed within the time allowed therefor, the 
proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the day 
after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed and 
not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-10137 Filed 4-24-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 108 (Tuesday, June 8, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 30513]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-12025]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD


Release of Waybill Data

    The Surface Transportation Board has received a request from Miami 
University (WB21-40--6/1/21) for permission to use data from the 
Board's 1983-2019 Unmasked Carload Waybill Samples. A copy of this 
request may be obtained from the Board's website under docket no. WB21-
40.
    The waybill sample contains confidential railroad and shipper data; 
therefore, if any parties object to these requests, they should file 
their objections with the Director of the Board's Office of Economics 
within 14 calendar days of the date of this notice. The rules for 
release of waybill data are codified at 49 CFR 1244.9.
    Contact: Alexander Dusenberry, (202) 245-0319.

Eden Besera,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2021-12025 Filed 6-7-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7408

In Re: JOSEPH JOHNSON, JR.,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-93-209-M)

Submitted: December 20, 2001 Decided: January 2, 2002

Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Johnson, Jr., Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Johnson, Jr., has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking to have this court direct the district court to act

on a motion he alleges he filed on June 19, 2001, in a criminal

case to expunge the record. Our review of the district court’s

docket sheet reveals that Johnson filed a motion to expunge the

record in January 2001, and that the district court has ruled on

the motion. There is no record of an identical motion filed in

June 2001, as Johnson alleges. Further, this is the second petition for a writ of mandamus that Johnson has filed regarding a

motion to expunge the record. Where there is another available

remedy, mandamus relief is not available. In re Beard, 811 F.2d

818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). Mandamus relief is not a substitute for

appeal. In re United Steelworkers, 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir.

1979). Johnson could have challenged the denial of his motion by

filing an appeal. Accordingly, we deny mandamus relief. We grant

Johnson’s motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, **Alan Campbell**, certify that:

(1)         I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 of Power Air Corporation (the "Company");

(2)         Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3)         Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4)         The Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Company and have:

(a)         designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)         evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)         disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal quarter (the Company's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting; and

(5)         The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of the Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)         all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)         any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:     May 13, 2008.

/s/ *Alan Campbell*
exv10wxby



 





Exhibit 10(b)




Amendment to Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”)



To increase the number of shares of the Company’s common stock that may be credited under the Plan
and to reflect the two-for-one stock split in the form of a 100 percent stock dividend on the
Company’s common stock distributed August 11, 2006, to holders of record on August 4, 2006, the
first sentence of Section 17 of the Plan was amended on September 26, 2006 to read:





“Subject to adjustment as provided in this Section 17, the maximum number of shares of
Common Stock that may be credited under the Plan is 16,000,000.”