alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w6






Exhibit 10.6




DOMAIN RIGHTS COLLATERAL AGREEMENT AND NOTICE




     This Domain Rights Collateral Agreement and Notice dated as of April 14, 2010, is between
Cardiovascular Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation with its principal place of
business at 651 Campus Drive, St. Paul, MN 55112 (“Assignor”) and Partners for Growth III,
L.P., 180 Pacific Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94111 (“Assignee”) pursuant to a Loan and
Security Agreement dated April 14, 2010, by and between Assignor and Assignee and pursuant to
certain other loan documents referenced therein (collectively, the “Loan Documents”).



     WHEREAS, Assignor is the owner of certain Domain Rights as defined in the Loan Documents which
are, as of the date hereof, as listed on Exhibit 1 hereto (the “Domain Rights”);
and



     WHEREAS, Assignee has agreed to extend certain credit to Assignor on condition that the
Assignor pledge and grant to Assignee as collateral for the Obligations (as defined in the Loan
Documents) a security interest and lien in and to the Domain Rights and all proceeds thereof and
all other related claims and rights as more fully described in a certain Intellectual Property
Security Agreement (the “Security Agreement”) in favor of the Assignee dated April 14, 2010, by and
between Assignor and Assignee;



     NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, as security for the due and timely payment
and performance of the Obligations: (1) Assignor hereby pledges and grants to Assignee a security
interest and lien in and to the Domain Rights and all proceeds thereof and gives notice of such
security interest and the existence of such Security Agreement providing therefor; and (2) Assignor
hereby irrevocably appoints PFG as its lawful attorney-in-fact without any further authorization to
take any action and file any notice on behalf of Assignor that Assignor itself could file in
respect of its Domain Rights, including without limitation, to transfer Domain Rights, change
administrative contacts in respect of Domain Rights, maintain Domain Rights, and provide
instructions to domain hosting services and any domain name registrars.



     Executed as of the date first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 

	Assignor:	 	 	 	Assignee:	 	 
	 
	Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.	 	 	 	PARTNERS FOR GROWTH III, L.P.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By	 	/s/ David L. Martin	 	 	 	By	 	/s/ Lorraine Nield	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Chief Executive Officer
	 	 	 	 	 	Name:
	 	Lorraine Nield	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Title:
	 	 Manager, Partners for Growth III, LLC	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Its General Partner	 	 
	By

	 	/s/ James E. Flaherty	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Secretary
Order entered May 6, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 18 - 00473 - CR No. 05 - 18 - 0047 4 - CR RICKEY LECARDO MCGEE , Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appea l from the Criminal District Court No. 1 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s. F 16 - 34511 - H ; F16 - 34499 - H 

### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s pro se motion to recuse Chief Justice Robert Burns from the above

- numbered appeal s . Chief Justice Robert Burns is not on the panel to which the above

numbered appeal s will be submitted, and he will not be a participant in the disposition of these appeal s . Further, it appears appellant is represented by appointed counsel. A criminal defendant is not entitled to hybrid representation. See Robinson v. State , 240 S.W.3d 919, 922 (Tex . Crim. App. 2007)

. Appellant’s motion to recuse is DENIED

. /s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES PRESIDING JUSTICE
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1693

CHARLES L. FREEZE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JESSE BROWN, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Salisbury. James A. Beaty, Jr.,

District Judge. (CA-94-554-4)

Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: December 30, 1996

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles L. Freeze, Appellant Pro Se. John Warren Stone, Jr.,

Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his action filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of

1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (1994). We have

reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Freeze v. Brown, No. CA-94-554-4 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 25,

1996). We deny Appellant's motion to appoint counsel and dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,979
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,410
<ALLOWANCES>                                        55
<INVENTORY>                                     35,614
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           3,387
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,870
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  52,784
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            99
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,650
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    52,784
<SALES>                                         68,658
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                68,658
<CGS>                                           60,839
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   60,839
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,450
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,136)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (489)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (647)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (647)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.061)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.061)
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officers of Bioforce Nanosciences Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify, to the best of their knowledge, that:



1.     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2018 (the "Report") of the Company complies in all material respects with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |                                                                
|-------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |                                                                
|Dated: July 24, 2018 | /s/Richard Kaiser
Richard Kaiser
Acting Chief Financial Officer
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Juan PAYNE, Defendant/Respondent.

No. 66875.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

Sept. 26, 1995.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 30, 1995.

Application to Transfer Denied Dec. 19, 1995.

Dee Joyce Hayes, Edward Sweeney, St. Louis, for appellant.

Michael B. Marker, East St. Louis, IL, for respondent.

Before AHRENS, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and GRIMM, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

A jury found defendant guilty of first degree murder and armed criminal action under §§ 565.020.1 and 571.015, RSMo 1994. The trial court granted defendant’s motion for new trial finding it had erroneously admitted prejudicial hearsay evidence. State appeals.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7302

SYNTRON Material Handling: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions.

pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of AdZone Research, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ending March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles Cardona,
acting in the capacity as the Principal Accounting Officer of the Company,
certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to AdZone Research, Inc. and will be retained by AdZone Research, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.


                           /s/ Charles Cardona
                           ----------------------------
                           Charles Cardona,
                           Principal Accounting Officer
                           July 14, 2006
## State of N ew York Su p reme C ou rt, A p p ellate Division Third J u dicial Dep artment Decided and Entered: February 25, 2016 D-11-16

___________________________________ In the Matter of ATTORNEYS IN VIOLATION OF JUDICIARY LAW § 468-a. COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL MEMORANDUM AND ORDER STANDARDS, ON MOTION Petitioner; JOSEPH GEORGE MURRAY, Respondent. (Attorney Registration No. 3055662)

___________________________________ Calendar Date: December 21, 2015 Before: Garry, J.P., Egan Jr., Rose and Lynch, JJ.

__________ Monica A. Duffy, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany, for petitioner. Joseph George Murray, Syracuse, respondent pro se.

__________ Per Curiam. Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 2000, was suspended by this Court's order dated January 30, 2014 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a (113 AD3d 1020 [2014]). Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that he has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object-2- D-11-16

to respondent's application. Respondent's application is granted and he is ordered reinstated, effective immediately. Garry, J.P., Egan Jr., Rose and Lynch, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that respondent's application is granted; and it is further ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5554 

To prohibit the use of organophosphate pesticides on food. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2023 

Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ (for herself, Mr. BOWMAN, Ms. MENG, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, 

and Ms. BARRAGA ́N) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To prohibit the use of organophosphate pesticides on food. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ban All Neurotoxic 

5 Organophosphate Pesticides From Our Food Act’’ or the 

6 ‘‘BAN OPs From Our Food Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USE OF ORGANOPHOSPHATES ON 

8 FOOD. 

9 Section 402 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 

10 Act (21 U.S.C. 342) is amended by adding at the end the 

11 following: 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5554 IH

1 ‘‘(j) If it bears or contains any organophosphate pes2 ticide, including any residue of an organophosphate pes3 ticide, or any other added substance the presence of which 

4 is primarily as a result of the metabolism or other deg5 radation of an organophosphate pesticide, regardless of 

6 whether any tolerance or exemption with respect to 

7 organophosphate is in effect under section 408.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5607 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow both spouses to 

make catch-up contributions to the same health savings account. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 20, 2023 

Mr. STEUBE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow both 

spouses to make catch-up contributions to the same 

health savings account. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Contribution Opportu5 nities for United Partners with Limit Expansions in a Sin6 gle HSA’’ or the ‘‘COUPLES HSA Act’’. 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5607 IH

1 SEC. 2. ALLOW BOTH SPOUSES TO MAKE CATCH-UP CON2 TRIBUTIONS TO THE SAME HEALTH SAVINGS 

3 ACCOUNT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 223(b)(5) of the Internal 

5 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows: 

6 ‘‘(5) SPECIAL RULE FOR MARRIED INDIVIDUALS

7 WITH FAMILY COVERAGE.— 

8 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—In the case of individ9 uals who are married to each other, if both 

10 spouses are eligible individuals and either 

11 spouse has family coverage under a high de12 ductible health plan as of the first day of any 

13 month— 

14 ‘‘(i) the limitation under paragraph 

15 (1) shall be applied by not taking into ac16 count any other high deductible health 

17 plan coverage of either spouse (and if such 

18 spouses both have family coverage under 

19 separate high deductible health plans, only 

20 one such coverage shall be taken into ac21 count), 

22 ‘‘(ii) such limitation (after application 

23 of clause (i)) shall be reduced by the ag24 gregate amount paid to Archer MSAs of 

25 such spouses for the taxable year, and 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5607 IH

1 ‘‘(iii) such limitation (after application 

2 of clauses (i) and (ii)) shall be divided 

3 equally between such spouses unless they 

4 agree on a different division. 

5 ‘‘(B) TREATMENT OF ADDITIONAL CON6 TRIBUTION AMOUNTS.—If both spouses referred 

7 to in subparagraph (A) have attained age 55 

8 before the close of the taxable year, the limita9 tion referred to in subparagraph (A)(iii) which 

10 is subject to division between the spouses shall 

11 include the additional contribution amounts de12 termined under paragraph (3) for both spouses. 

13 In any other case, any additional contribution 

14 amount determined under paragraph (3) shall 

15 not be taken into account under subparagraph 

16 (A)(iii) and shall not be subject to division be17 tween the spouses.’’. 

18 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

19 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

20 December 31, 2023. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 31(a)****CERTIFICATIONS****CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**I, Michael J. Quillen, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q (this “Report”) of Alpha NaturalResources, Inc. (the “Registrant”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this Report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisReport; 4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisReport is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation;and  c. Disclosed in this Report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting;5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.                                    /s/ Michael J. Quillen   Michael J. Quillen   *President and Chief Executive Officer*
---

---

Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual report
of Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period
ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Tal Payne, principal financial officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1.    
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Tal PayneTal Payne
Chief Financial Officer
April 9, 2008



---

---
EXHIBIT 10.3


                                 Third Amendment
                                     to the
                          1993 Stock Incentive Plan of
                           E. W. Blanch Holdings, Inc.


         This Third Amendment to the 1993 Stock Incentive Plan of E. W. Blanch
Holdings, Inc. has been made by E. W. Blanch Holdings, Inc. ("the Company"):

         WHEREAS, the Company has previously established the 1993 Stock
Incentive Plan to provide a means to attract able persons to enter and remain in
the employ of the Company; and

         WHEREAS, the Company has reserved the right to amend the Plan under the
terms hereof;

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Company hereby amends the Agreement as follows:

         Subsection "a" of Section 5 has been amended to read as follows:

         "(a) Subject to Section 12, the aggregate number of shares of Stock
         made subject to Awards may not exceed 4,400,000;"

The provisions of the 1993 Stock Incentive Plan shall remain otherwise
unchanged.
#### Marvin DUNCAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 42643.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Feb. 13, 1991.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 2, 1991.

Application to Transfer Denied May 3, 1991.

David S. Durbin, Appellate Defender, Anthony C. Cardarella, Asst. Appellate Defender, Office of Public Defender, Kansas City, appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, respondent.

Before TURNAGE, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN, and ULRICH, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from denial of Rule 27.26 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentia-ry hearing.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).