alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of American Realty Investors, Inc. (the Company), on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven A. Abney, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |                                                                                                                  
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: April 2, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/    STEVEN A. ABNEY                                                                                           
|                     |  |  |  | Steven A. Abney Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|                     |  |  |  | and Acting Principal Executive Officer
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C., ss.1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Smartpay Express, Inc. (the
"Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Smartpay Express
Inc.








Date: May
      17, 2010
            By
            /s/
      Ping TangPing
      TangChairman
      and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                              ADZONE RESEARCH, INC.
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of AdZone Research, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles Cardona, Chief
Executive  Officer,  Acting Chief Financial Officer and Director of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to AdZone Research,  Inc. and will be retained by AdZone Research, Inc.
and  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or its staff upon
request.

Date: July 13, 2005

/s/ Charles Cardona
----------------------
Charles Cardona, Chief Executive Officer
   and Acting Chief Financial Officer
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON



### O RDER

Appellate case name: In re David Timothy Butterfield

A ppellate case number: 01

- 1 8

- 0 0 90 3

- CV

Trial court case number: 97319

- F

Trial court: 300th District Court of Brazoria County

R elator

, David Timothy Butterfield

, ha s filed a petition for a writ of mandamus

and a “ Motion to Stay Proceedings

. ” The motion to stay is granted

. The trial court

proceedings in Case No. 97319

- F, pending in the 300th District Court of Brazoria

County, Texas are stayed. The stay is effective until disposition of relator ’ s petition for a

writ of mandamus or further order of this Court.

It is so ORDER ED.

Judge’s signature: ___

/s/ Terry Jennings

______  Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: __ November 8, 2018

__
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 81 (Thursday, April 25, 1996)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 18250]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10280]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

31 CFR Part 103

RIN 1506-AA13


Requirement to Report Suspicious Transactions; Correction

AGENCY: Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, Treasury.

ACTION: Correction to final regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to the final rule 
requiring banks to file reports of suspicious transactions under the 
Bank Secrecy Act, which was published Monday, February 5, 1996 (61 FR 
4326).

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 25, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles Klingman, Office of Financial 
Institutions Policy, FinCEN (703) 905-3920; or Joseph M. Myers, 
Attorney-Advisor, Office of Legal Counsel, FinCEN, at (703) 905-3590.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The final regulations that are the subject of these corrections 
require banks and other depository institutions to report to the 
Department of the Treasury under the Bank Secrecy Act any suspicious 
transactions relevant to possible violations of federal law or 
regulation.

Need for Correction

    As published, the final regulations contain an error which may 
prove to be misleading and is in need of clarification.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, the publication on February 5, 1996 of the final 
regulations, which were the subject of FR Doc. 96-2272, is corrected as 
follows:


Sec. 103.21  [Corrected]

    3. On page 4332, in the second column, in Sec. 103.21, paragraph 
(f), line 7, the word ``shall'' is corrected to read ``may''.

    Dated: April 22, 1996.
Anna Fotias,
Alternate Federal Register Liaison Officer, Financial Crimes 
Enforcement Network.
[FR Doc. 96-10280 Filed 4-24-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4820-03-P
exv10w1











Exhibit 10.1




FOURTH AMENDMENT TO 1992 EMPLOYEES’ STOCK PURCHASE PLAN




     Section 9.2 of the Plan, as previously amended, has been amended and restated (effective as of
Board approval of the Amendment) to read in its entirety as follows:



     “9.2. Number of Shares. The maximum number of Option Shares shall be an amount equal to the
amount of the Optionee’s Gross Compensation permitted to be withheld during the period running from
the Grant Date to the Exercise Date, divided by the purchase price determined in accordance with
Section 9.3, but in no event greater than 10,000 shares or such other number of shares as the Board
may determine before the Grant Date with respect to an Option. The number of Option Shares shall
further be limited by the amount of payroll deductions actually withheld as of the Exercise Date.”
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-15-0000900

25-JUL-2016

09:11 AM
#### Kelly L. WATTS, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 40886.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

March 21, 1989.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 2, 1989.

Sean D. O’Brien, Public Defender, Leon Munday, Asst. Public Defender, Kansas City, for movant-appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before MANFORD, P.J., and TURNAGE and LOWENSTEIN, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Direct appeal from the denial of Rule 27.26 motion for post-conviction relief.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Amendment No. 4 to Advisory Agreement



 Exhibit 10.3 

AMENDMENT NO. 4 

TO THE 
 ADVISORY
AGREEMENT 
 This amendment no. 4 to the Advisory Agreement dated as of November 8, 2009 (the “Advisory
Agreement”) between KBS Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), and KBS Capital Advisors LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Advisor”), is entered as of May 7, 2010 (the
“Amendment”). Capitalized terms used herein but not defined shall have the meaning set forth in the Advisory Agreement. 

WHEREAS, upon the terms set forth in this Amendment, the Advisor has agreed to amend and restate Article 16 of the Advisory Agreement and
advance funds to the Company upon the terms set forth below. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of the
mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, the parties hereto agree that Article 16 of the Advisory Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 

ADVANCE 

Notwithstanding anything contained in Article 9 of this Agreement to the contrary, the Advisor hereby agrees to advance funds (the
“Advance”) to the Company equal to the amount by which the cumulative amount of distributions declared by the Company from January 1, 2006 through the period ending July 31, 2010 exceeds the amount of the Company’s Funds
from Operations from January 1, 2006 through July 31, 2010. Advisor further agrees that the Company will only be obligated to reimburse the Advisor for the Advance if and to the extent that the Company’s cumulative Funds from
Operations for the period commencing January 1, 2006 through the date of any such reimbursement exceeds the lesser of (i) the cumulative amount of any distributions declared and payable to the Company’s Stockholders as of the date of
such reimbursement or (ii) an amount that is equal to a 7.0% cumulative, non-compounded, annual return on Invested Capital for the Company’s Stockholders for the period from July 18, 2006 through the date of such reimbursement.
Advisor understands and agrees that no interest shall accrue on the Advance being made under this Agreement. 
  

 
 Signature page follows. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date and year
first above written. 
  

					
	KBS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
			
	   By:	 	/s/ Charles J. Schreiber, Jr.	 	
		 	Charles J. Schreiber, Jr., Chief Executive Officer


  

 

			
	KBS CAPITAL ADVISORS LLC
		
	   By:	 	Schreiber Real Estate Investments, L.P., a Manager


  

			
	By:	 	Schreiber Investments, LLC, as general partner


  

					
	By:	 	/s/ Charles J. Schreiber, Jr.	 	
		 	Charles J. Schreiber, Jr., Manager
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 77 (Friday, April 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 19960]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9922]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Labor Advisory Committee for Trade Negotiations and Trade Policy; 
Meeting Notice

    Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(P.L. 92-463 as amended), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the 
Labor Advisory Committee for Trade Negotiations and Trade Policy.

    Date, time and place: May 11, 1995, 10:00 a.m.-12:00 noon, U.S. 
Department of Labor, Room N-4437 B&C, 200 Constitution Ave., NW., 
Washington, DC 20210.
    Purpose: The meeting will include a review and discussion of 
current issues which influence U.S. trade policy Potential U.S. 
negotiating objectives and bargaining positions in current and 
anticipated trade negotiations will be discussed. Pursuant to 
section 9(B) of the Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 
552b(c)(9)(B) it has been determined that the meeting will be 
concerned with matters the disclosure of which would seriously 
compromise the Government's negotiating objectives or bargaining 
positions. Accordingly, the meeting will be closed to the public.
    For further information, contact: Fernand Lavallee, Director, 
Trade Advisory Group, Phone: (202) 219-4752.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 17th day of April, 1995.
Joaquin Otero,
Deputy Under Secretary International Affairs.
[FR Doc. 95-9922 Filed 4-20-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-28-M
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Markland Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended June 30,2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Lawrence Shatsoff, President and Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of
                  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                  of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.




Date: October 18, 2002
                                                     /s/Lawrence Shatsoff
                                                       --------------------
                                                 President and Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

December 26, 2012

t1217

Order 

December 26, 2012

145875 & (10)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145875

COA: 310908

Jackson CC: 11-004506-FC

BRIAN EDWARD PFAFFINGER,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 24, 2012 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to remand is

DENIED.
TREVOR BERNARD SMALLS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-5927

_____________________________/

Opinion filed September 14, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Walton County.

Kelvin C. Wells, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant; Trevor Bernard Smalls, pro se, Appellant. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

RAY, KELSEY, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARABANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fortune Partners, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the nine months ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Don Prest, Secretary/Treasurer/Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                           |  |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|
| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |  |

| Dated: | July 21, 2005 | By: | //s// *Don Prest*   |  |
|--------|---------------|-----|---------------------|--|
|        |               |     | Don Prest           |  |
|        |               |     | Secretary/Treasurer |  |

----
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-40907 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v. SAMUEL MARTINEZ Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:07-CR-214-1
Before KING, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Samuel Martinez appeals his guilty plea conviction and sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute fifty grams or more of methamphetamine, possession with intent to distribute fifty grams or more of methamphetamine, and importation of fifty grams or more of methamphetamine. He argues that his sentence is unreasonable because it was based upon a mechanical application of the Guidelines, and the Sentencing Commission has shown that drug offenders transporting methamphetamine are United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D July 2, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-40907

2 punished more severely than necessary. He asserts that his sentence is too
severe because his offense was simple drug smuggling, because while his criminal history was long, he had never served more than 180 days of imprisonment previously, and because he has lived in the United States all his life. Martinez did not argue that his sentence was unreasonable because the guidelines provisions regarding methamphetamine offenses were too severe below. Accordingly, to the extent that Martinez’s reasonableness argument relies upon the severity of the guidelines provisions regarding methamphetamine, we review for plain error. See United States v. Peltier, 505 F.3d 389, 391-92 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (Jan. 22, 2008) (No. 07- 8978).As the district court sentenced Martinez within the properly calculated guidelines range, the sentence is presumptively reasonable. See United States
v. Alonzo, 435 F.3d 551, 554 (5th Cir. 2006). While the Supreme Court has recently held that a district court may deviate from the guidelines range based upon a determination that a guidelines provision is unduly severe, it did not hold that a district court’s refusal todeviate from the guidelines range based upon the severity of a guidelines provision was unreasonable. See Kimbrough v. United States, 128 S. Ct. 558, 570-76 (2007). Martinez has not rebutted the presumption of reasonableness or shown that the sentence was plainly
erroneous. See Alonzo, 435 F.3d at 554; G all v. United States, 128 S. Ct. 586, 597 (2007). For the first time on appeal, Martinez argues that the penalty scheme in 21 U.S.C. § 841(a) and (b) is unconstitutional in light ofApprendi v. NewJersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). As Martinez concedes, this argument is foreclosed. See United States v. Slaughter, 238 F.3d 580, 582-84 (5th Cir. 2000). AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 75 (Wednesday, April 19, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 19569]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9655]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service


Intergovernmental Advisory Committee Meeting

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Intergovernmental Advisory Committee (IAC) will meet on 
May 4, 1995, at the Sheraton Portland Airport Hotel, 8235 N.E. Airport 
Way, Portland Oregon, 97230. The purpose of the meeting is to continue 
discussions on the implementation of the Northwest Forest Plan. The 
meeting will begin at 9:00 a.m. on May 4 and continue until 5:00 p.m. 
Agenda items to be covered include: (1) A review and discussion of 
comments on the revised federal watershed analysis guide; (2) a 
discussion of watershed restoration projects and the federal ``jobs-in-
the-woods'' program; (3) a report on role, function and staffing 
requirements of the IAC Research and Monitoring subcommittee, and the 
Interorganization Resource Information Coordinating Council; (4) a 
discussion of recent federal legislative action relative to the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (FACA) and its relation to the IAC; and (5) a 
discussion of topics to be addressed at future meetings. The IAC 
meeting will be open to the public. Written comments may be submitted 
for the record at the meeting. Time will also be scheduled for oral 
public comments. Interested persons are encouraged to attend.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Questions regarding this meeting may be directed to Don Knowles, 
Executive Director, Regional Ecosystem Office, 333 SW 1st Avenue, P.O. 
Box 3623, Portland, OR 97208 (Phone: 503-326-6265).

    Dated: April 5, 1995.
Donald R. Knowles,
Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 95-9655 Filed 4-18-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
EXHIBIT
        32.1
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**
 **OF
        THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 The
        undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
        pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Annual
        Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies
        with
        the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
        of
        1934, as amended, and the information contained in such report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of
        SYNTHENOL INC.
 
 
 */s/
                    Cecil Morris*
                
                Date:
                    May 10, 2007Cecil
                    Morris
                  Director,
                    President / Secretary
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5734 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5734

   To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to extend the 
     Administrative Fine Program for certain reporting violations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 26, 2023

Mr. Steil (for himself and Mr. Morelle) introduced the following bill; 
      which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to extend the 
     Administrative Fine Program for certain reporting violations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF ADMINISTRATIVE FINE PROGRAM.

    Section 309(a)(4)(C)(v) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 
1971 (52 U.S.C. 30109(a)(4)(C)(v)) is amended by striking ``December 
31, 2023'' and inserting ``December 31, 2033''.
                                 <all>
```