alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.01**

** **

**Section 1350 Certification**

** **

**In connection with this quarterlyreport of ML Aspect FuturesAccess LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I, Paul Morton, Chief ExecutiveOfficer, President and Manager of Merrill Lynch Alternative Investments LLC,the manager of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:**

** **

1. This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information containedin this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: May 14, 2008               |            |
|---------------------------------------|-----------------|
| By                                    | /s/ PAUL MORTON |   |
| Paul Morton                           |            |
| Chief Executive Officer and President |            |
| (Principal Executive Officer)         |            |
|                                       |                 |  |

 

----
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT LAUREN PAULSON, Plaintiff - Appe lla nt / C ross- Ape lle e , v. M ATT AR

B AUGH; e t a l., De fe nda

nts - Appe lle e s / C ross- Apella nts. And AM YM ITC HELL, De fe nda

nt. Nos. 13-35077 13-35407 D.C . No. 3:12-mc -00196-M O M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a ls from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ore gon M i c ha e l W . M osm a

n, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d

June 22, 2015 ** B e fore : LEAVY, HAWKINS, and W . FLETC HER , C irc u it Judge s. 

# FIL ED JUL 09 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s the se c a se s are suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).La

ure n Pa ulson a ppe a ls pro sefrom

the distric t c ourt’ s sum

m a ry judgm e nt in his a c tion a lle ging a c o n spira c y to deprive him

of prope rty . M att Arba

u gh a nd C ra ig R ussillo c ross-a

ppe a l from

the distric t c ourt’ s orde r gra nting Pa u l son’ s m otion to re o pe n t

he tim e to a

ppe a l. W e dismiss for la c k of jurisdic t ion. Pa ulson fa ile d to a

ppe a l within 30 da

y s of De c e m

be r 21, 2012, the date on whic h the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt wa s e nte re d, a s re quire d by Fe de ra l R

u le of Appe l lat e Proc e dure 4(a )(1)(A). The distric t c ourt gra nte d Pa ulson’ s m otion to re ope n the tim e to a

ppe a l the judgm e nt, but Pa u lson did not show tha

t he re c e ive d notic e of the judgm e nt m ore tha n 21 da y s a fte r e ntry of the judgm e nt a s re quire d by R ule 4(a )(6). Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 4(a)(6)(A); Arai v . Am. Bry c eRanc h e s Inc . , 316 F.3d 1066, 1069-70 (9th C ir. 2003) (ruling on a R ule 4(a )(6) m o tion re vie we d for a b use of disc re tion); N

unle y v . C i ty of Los Ange le

s , 52 F.3d 792, 795 (9th C ir. 1995) (them oving pa

rty ha s the burde n to de m onstra te non-re c e i pt). Ac c ordingly , Pa ulson’ s notic e of a

ppe a l wa s untim e ly

and we la c k jurisdic tion. Se e Ste p hanie -C ardona LLC

v . Smith’s Food &

Drug C trs., Inc . , 476 F.3d 701, 703 (9th C ir. 2007) (“A tim e l y notic e of a

ppe a l is a non-wa iva

b le jurisdic tiona l re quire m e nt.” ).

13 - 3 50 7 7 & 1 3 - 3 5 4 0 7 2B e c a

use we dismiss for la c k of jurisdic tion, wedo not c onside r Pa ulson’ s argum e nts on a

ppe a l a ddre ssing theunde rly ing m e rits or his pending motions. DISM I SSE D.

13 - 3 50 7 7 & 1 3 - 3 5 4 0 7 3
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Christine Kilbourn, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Intelbahn Inc. for
      the period ended April 30, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Intelbahn Inc.                                                                 

Dated: June 16, 2009



| | /s/
      Christine Kilbourn                                   
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------
| | Christine Kilbourn                                             
| | President, Treasurer and Director                              
| | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal
      Financial Officer
| | and Principal Accounting Officer)                              
| | Intelbahn Inc.                                                 



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Intelbahn Inc.
and will be retained by Intelbahn Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
#### John Winfred HARRIS, Appellant-Respondent, v. Judy Maureen HARRIS, Respondent-Appellant.

No. WD 41894.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Feb. 20, 1990.

*631Michael W. Walker, Kansas City, for appellant-respondent.

Donald J. Lock, Gladstone, for respondent-appellant.

Before ULRICH, P.J., and SHANGLER and TURNAGE, JJ.

TURNAGE, Judge.

John Harris filed an action for dissolution of his marriage to Judy Harris and division of property. The court dissolved the marriage, divided the property, and awarded Judy $400 per month as maintenance. The court also made other awards to Judy which are not in question here.

On this appeal Judy complains about the division of property and John complains about the award of maintenance to Judy. Affirmed as modified.

The division of marital property in a dissolution action is consigned to the sole discretion of the trial court and the appellate court must defer to the judgment of the trial court unless the judgment is improper under *Murphy v. Carron,*536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976), or an abuse of discretion is shown. *Dardick v. Dardick,*670 S.W.2d 865, 868[3] (Mo. banc 1984). A review of the record does not show that the judgment dividing the marital property is improper under *Murphy*or that the court abused its discretion in such division. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. Rule 84.16(b).

John contends the award of $400 per month in maintenance is improper. The award of maintenance is also a matter resting within the sole discretion of the trial court and John has the burden of demonstrating an abuse of that discretion. *Woods v. Woods,*713 S.W.2d 292, 294[4-6] (Mo.App.1986). The evidence revealed that Judy’s income was about $800 less than her average monthly expenses. Section 452.-335.1(2), RSMo Supp.1988, provides that maintenance may be awarded if a spouse is unable to support himself through appropriate employment. The evidence revealed that Judy was employed but was still unable to support herself. No abuse of discretion appears. An extended opinion on this point would have no precedential value. Rule 84.16(b).

Section 452.335.3 required the court to state if the maintenance is modifiable or non-modifiable. The court failed to include that specification in the decree.

In view of the fact that Judy was forty-three years of age at the time of trial and considering the uncertainly surrounding future events, the award of maintenance should be modifiable.

The judgment is modified by specifying that the award of maintenance shall be modifiable. In all other respects the judgment is affirmed.

All concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of

ROBERT C. LITWACK

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT
FROM INACTIVE STATUS :

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 167 DB 201 7 (No. 99 RST 2017)

Attorney Registration No. 38280

( Out of State )

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 22 nd day of December

, 201 7 , the Report and Recommendation

of Disciplinary Board Member dated December 14

, 2017, is approved and it is

ORDERED that Robert C. Litwack

, who has been on Inactive Status

, has never been

suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications,

competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the

Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the

Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation

and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner.
#### Andy HINES, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Paul GAIN, Defendant/Appellant.

No. 68072.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

April 23, 1996.

Paul Gain, Ravenden Springs, Arkansas, pro se.

Terry R. Rottier, Ste. Genevieve, for respondent.

Before PUDLOWSKI, P. J., and SIMON and HOFF, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of an oral contract judgment in which the pro se defendant was ordered to pay plaintiff $888. Defendant’s counter-claim was denied. We have read the briefs, legal file and transcript. We find no error of law and discern that there is no precedential value in publishing an opinion. We, therefore, affirm the judgment and issue this summary order in compliance with Rule 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 81 (Thursday, April 25, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 18386]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10140]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Project No. 1980-009]


Wisconsin Electric Power Company; Notice Establishing Procedures 
for Relicensing and a Deadline for Submission of Final Amendments

April 19, 1996.
    The license for the Big Quinnesec Falls Hydroelectric Project No. 
1980, located on the Menominee River, in Florence and Marinette 
Counties, Wisconsin and Dickinson County, Michigan, expires on February 
28, 1998. The statutory deadline for filing an application for new 
license is February 28, 1996. An application for new license has been 
filed by the applicant on February 27, 1996, as follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Project No.               Applicant               Contact       
------------------------------------------------------------------------
P-1980-009................  Wisconsin Electric     Ms. Rita L. Hayen,   
                             Power Company.         P.E., 231 West      
                                                    Michigan Street,    
                                                    P.O. Box 2046,      
                                                    Milwaukee, WI 53201-
                                                    2046.               
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The following is an approximate schedule and procedure that will be 
followed in processing the application:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Date                                Action             
------------------------------------------------------------------------
June 24, 1996.........................  Commission notifies applicant   
                                         that its application has been  
                                         accepted.                      
June 24, 1996.........................  Commission issues a public      
                                         notice of the accepted         
                                         application establishing dates 
                                         for filing motions to intervene
                                         and protests.                  
June 24, 1996.........................  Commission's deadline for       
                                         applicant for filing a final   
                                         amendment, if any, to its      
                                         application.                   
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Any questions concerning this Notice should be directed to Patti 
Leppert-Slack at (202) 219-2767.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-10140 Filed 4-24-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<PAGE>


                                                                 EXHIBIT 10(a)


                     CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in AXA's Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-9212, 333-12088 and 333-12944) and on Form
F-3 (Nos. 333-12872 and 333-12956) of our report dated March 15, 2001 (except
for Note 25 which is dated May 9, 2001) relating to the consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears on page
F-1 of AXA's Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2000.



Bcfee - Price Waterhouse
Member of PricewaterhouseCoopers


/s/ Gerard Dantheny
Gerard Dantheny


Paris, France
May 25, 2001
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of K&F Industries Holdings, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Dirkson R. Charles, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ DIRKSON R. CHARLES
----------------------------------
Dirkson R. Charles
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
August 15, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         391
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               391
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,141
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,230
<OTHER-SE>                                     (89)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,141
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2,222
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,222)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,222)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,222)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.00)



</TABLE>
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5470 

To extend temporary authority regarding license portability for certain practitioners to be able to practice across State borders, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 14, 2023 

Mr. CISCOMANI (for himself, Mr. VASQUEZ, Mr. CARL, and Ms. PEREZ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To extend temporary authority regarding license portability 

for certain practitioners to be able to practice across 

State borders, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veteran Medical 

5 Exams for Distant Areas Act’’ or the ‘‘VET MEDS Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5470 IH

1 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION TO MATTERS RELATING TO DE2 PARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL 

3 DISABILITY EXAMINATIONS. 

4 Section 2002(a)(4) of the Johnny Isakson and David 

5 P. Roe, M.D. Veterans Health Care and Benefits Improve6 ment Act of 2020 (Public Law 116–315; 38 U.S.C. 5101 

7 note) is amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘On the date that is three years 

9 after the date of the enactment of this Act’’ and in10 serting ‘‘On September 1, 2028’’; and 

11 (2) by striking ‘‘on the day before the date of 

12 the enactment of this Act’’ and insert ‘‘on January 

13 4, 2021’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
EXHIBIT 21.01

                 LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF OCEAN POWER CORPORATION

The following are subsidiaries of Ocean Power Corporation, a Delaware
corporation:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------- ----------------------------
         Subsidiary                        Jurisdiction of Incorporation         Other Business Names
------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------- ----------------------------
<S>                                        <C>                                   <C>
Sigma Elektroteknisk, AS                   Norway                                N/A

------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------- ----------------------------
Ocean Power UK Limited                     England                               N/A

------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------- ----------------------------
Advanced Power Sources Corporation         Delaware                              N/A

------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------- ----------------------------
Integrated Water and Power Corporation     Delaware                              N/A

------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------- ----------------------------
Manufacturing Technologies Corporation     Delaware                              N/A

------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------- ----------------------------
</TABLE>
**Exhibit 13.1**

**ASAT Holdings Limited**

**Certification of Acting Chief Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to the requirements of 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Tung Lok Li, the Acting Chief Executive Officer of ASAT Holdings Limited (the “Company”), does hereby certify as follows:

To the best of my knowledge, the Company’s annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2006 accompanying thisCertification in the form filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated: October 10, 2006 

 

*The Certification set forth above is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and should not be deemed to be filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by the Company or the certifying officers.*
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL SKIDMORE, AS TRUSTEE 

FOR THE RANDY CRAIG WOLFE 

TRUST, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

LED ZEPPELIN; JAMES PATRICK 

PAGE; ROBERT ANTHONY PLANT; 

JOHN PAUL JONES; SUPER HYPE 

PUBLISHING, INC.; WARNER MUSIC 

GROUP CORPORATION; WARNER 

CHAPPELL MUSIC, INC.; ATLANTIC 

RECORDING CORPORATION; RHINO 

ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY, 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-56057 

D.C. No. 

2:15-cv-03462-RGK-AGR 

Central District of California, 

Los Angeles 

ORDER

FILED

JUN 10 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 

MICHAEL SKIDMORE, AS TRUSTEE 

FOR THE RANDY CRAIG WOLFE 

TRUST, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

WARNER/CHAPPELL MUSIC, INC, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

and 

LED ZEPPELIN; JAMES PATRICK 

PAGE; ROBERT ANTHONY PLANT; 

JOHN PAUL JONES; SUPER HYPE 

PUBLISHING, INC.; WARNER MUSIC 

GROUP CORPORATION, ATLANTIC 

RECORDING CORPORATION; RHINO 

ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY, 

Defendants,

No. 16-56287 

D.C. No. 

2:15-cv-03462-RGK-AGR 

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that 

these cases be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 

35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel disposition in this case shall 

not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit. 

Judge Collins did not participate in the deliberations or vote in these cases.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT




The Board of Directors
First State Bancorporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-17727) on Form S-3, and (No. 33-92056, No. 333-3048, No. 333-92795, and No.
333-83132) on Form S-8 of First State Bancorporation of our report dated January
17, 2003, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of First State
Bancorporation and subsidiary as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, stockholders'
equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2002, which report appears in the December 31, 2002, annual report
on Form 10-K of First State Bancorporation.

Our report refers to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, in 2002.



                                     KPMG LLP



Albuquerque, New Mexico
March 26, 2003
Missouri Court of Appeals

Southern District 

JULY 17, 2014 

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b). 

1. Case No. SD32961 

 Re: JAMES A. BRADDY, 

 Appellant, 

 vs. 

 STATE OF MISSOURI, 

 Respondent.