alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 81 (Thursday, April 25, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 18461]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10123]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration


RTCA, Inc.; Technical Management Committee

    Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(P.L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for the 
RTCA Technical Management Committee meeting to be held May 10, 1996, 
starting at 9:00 a.m. The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1140 
Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 1020, Washington, DC, 20036.
    The agenda will include: (1) Chairman's Remarks; (2) Review and 
Approval of Summary of the Previous Meeting; (3) Systems Management 
Working Group Report to the Technical Management Committee; (4) 
Consider and Approve: a. RTCA course of action concerning activities 
relating to EUROCAE Working Group 52; b. Course of action concerning 
white paper on required system performance; c. Terms of reference and 
chairman for new special committee concerned with developing FANS 
systems requirements and objectives; (5) Take Action on Open Items from 
Previous Meeting; (6) Other Business; (7) Date and Place of Next 
Meeting.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements or obtain information should contact the 
RTCA Secretariat, 1140 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 1020, 
Washington, D.C. 20036; (202) 833-9339 (phone) or (202) 833-9434 (fax). 
Members of the public may present a written statement to the committee 
at any time.

    Issued in Washington, D.C., on April 19, 1996.
Janice L. Peters,
Designated Official.
[FR Doc. 96-10123 Filed 4-24-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special Emphasis Panel; Understanding and Reducing Cardiovascular Disease in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.                    

*Date:*                         July 15, 2021.                    

*Time:*                         11:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                     

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health,  6705 Rockledge Drive,  Bethesda, MD 20817 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Susan Wohler Sunnarborg, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Room 208-Z, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 827-7987,                         *susan.sunnarborg@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 4, 2021.

David W. Freeman,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-12142 Filed 6-9-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
**Exhibit 12.2**

 

----

I, Derrick A. Nicholson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Avecia Group plc;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

| Date:  May 9, 2005 | By:    | /s/ Derrick A. Nicholson |
|--------------------|--------|--------------------------|
|               |   | Derrick A. Nicholson     |
|               |   | Chief Financial Officer  |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 84 (Tuesday, April 30, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 19095]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10623]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards Subcommittee Meeting on 
Instrumentation and Control Systems and Computers; Notice of Meeting

    The ACRS Subcommittee on Instrumentation and Control Systems and 
Computers will hold a meeting on May 22, 1996, Room T-2B3, 11545 
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland.
    The meeting will be open to public attendance.
    The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows:

Wednesday, May 22, 1996--8:30 a.m. Until the Conclusion of Business

    The Subcommittee will continue to discuss proposed Standard Review 
Plan Sections, Regulatory Guides, and Branch Technical Positions 
related to the digital instrumentation and control systems. The purpose 
of this meeting is to gather information, analyze relevant issues and 
facts, and to formulate proposed positions and actions, as appropriate, 
for deliberation by the full Committee.
    Oral statements may be presented by members of the public with the 
concurrence of the Subcommittee Chairman; written statements will be 
accepted and made available to the Committee. Electronic recordings 
will be permitted only during those portions of the meeting that are 
open to the public, and questions may be asked only by members of the 
Subcommittee, its consultants, and staff. Persons desiring to make oral 
statements should notify the cognizant ACRS staff engineer named below 
five days prior to the meeting, if possible, so that appropriate 
arrangements can be made.
    During the initial portion of the meeting, the Subcommittee, along 
with any of its consultants who may be present, may exchange 
preliminary views regarding matters to be considered during the balance 
of the meeting.
    The Subcommittee will then hear presentations by and hold 
discussions with representatives of the NRC staff, its consultants, and 
other interested persons regarding this review.
    Further information regarding topics to be discussed, whether the 
meeting has been cancelled or rescheduled, the Chairman's ruling on 
requests for the opportunity to present oral statements and the time 
allotted therefor can be obtained by contacting the cognizant ACRS 
staff engineer, Mr. Michael T. Markley (telephone 301/415-6885) between 
7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. (EDT). Persons planning to attend this meeting 
are urged to contact the above named individual one or two working days 
prior to the meeting to be advised of any potential changes to the 
agenda, etc., that may have occurred.

    Dated: April 24, 1996.
Sam Duraiswamy,
Chief, Nuclear Reactors Branch.
[FR Doc. 96-10623 Filed 4-29-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GUETATCHEW FIKROU, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

MONTGOMERY COUNTY OFFICE OF 

CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT 

DIVISION; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-15669 

D.C. No. 2:15-cv-01297-GMNNJK 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 9, 2017**

Before: SCHROEDER, TASHIMA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Guetatchew Fikrou appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment 

dismissing his action alleging federal and state law claims stemming from 

defendants’ enforcement of a child support order. We have jurisdiction under 28 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

AUG 15 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-15669 

U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under the Rooker-Feldman

doctrine. Noel v. Hall, 341 F.3d 1148, 1154 (9th Cir. 2003). We may affirm on 

any basis supported by the record. Johnson v. Riverside Healthcare Sys., LP, 534 

F.3d 1116, 1121 (9th Cir. 2008). We affirm. 

Dismissal of Fikrou’s action was proper because Fikrou failed to allege facts 

sufficient to establish that the district court had personal jurisdiction over any 

defendant. See Walden v. Fiore, 134 S. Ct. 1115, 1121-23 (2014) (discussing the 

requirements for specific personal jurisdiction and explaining that “the plaintiff 

cannot be the only link between the defendant and the forum”); Schwarzenegger v. 

Fred Martin Motor Co., 374 F.3d 797, 801 (9th Cir. 2004) (requirements for 

general personal jurisdiction). To the extent the district court erred by denying 

Fikrou’s motion for reconsideration contending that the Rooker-Feldman doctrine 

was inapplicable to his claims of extrinsic fraud, any error was harmless because 

dismissal was proper for lack of personal jurisdiction.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying leave to amend the

complaint because amendment would have been futile. See Chappel v. Lab. Corp. 

of Am., 232 F.3d 719, 725-26 (9th Cir. 2000) (setting forth standard of review and 

explaining that dismissal without leave to amend is proper when amendment would 

be futile).

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued 
3 16-15669 

in the opening brief or arguments raised for the first time on appeal. See Padgett v. 

Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.
BRIAN QUINN

Chief Justice

JAMES T. CAMPBELL

Justice

MACKEY K. HANCOCK

Justice

PATRICK A. PIRTLE

Justice

Court of Appeals

Seventh District of Texas

Potter County Courts Building

501 S. Fillmore, Suite 2-A

Amarillo, Texas 79101-2449

www.txcourts.gov/7thcoa.aspx

VIVIAN LONG

Clerk

MAILING ADDRESS:

P. O. Box 9540

79105-9540

(806) 342-2650

September 17, 2015

John H. Lovell

Barbara A. Bauernfeind

LOVELL, LOVELL, NEWSOM

& ISERN, L.L.P.

112 West 8th Avenue, Suite 1000

Eagle Centre Building

Amarillo, TX 79101

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Stanley R. Watson

STANLEY R. WATSON, P.C.

P. O. Box 506

Quanah, TX 79252

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Cornell D. Curtis

THE LAW OFFICE OF

CORNELL D. CURTIS, P.C.

1716 Main Street

Vernon, TX 76384

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Chris Lehman

MALONE LAW FIRM

P. O. Box 953

Vernon, TX 76385

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Jerry L. Ewing Jr.

Nathan Cash

WALTERS, BALIDO & CRAIN, L.L.P.

10440 North Central Expressway

Dallas, TX 75231

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Case Number: 07-15-00297-CV, Trial Court Case Number: 11,098

Style: Dimock Operating Company, and Joe W. Dimock, d/b/a Dimock Petroleum v. Sutherland Energy Co.,

LLC

Dear Counsel:

The following was filed Thursday, September 17, 2015, in the captioned appeal:

Corrected Reporter’s Record (6 volumes)

Very truly yours,

Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK

xc: Honorable Dan Mike Bird (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Gloria Judd Bourland (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Adam Bitter (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Shelley Eiserloh (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Ryan Mindell (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

FILE COPY
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published

and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-10881

Summary Calendar

THOMAS E. CRAIG,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

RYDER TRUCK RENTAL, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(3:97-CV-1533-D)

February 24, 1999

Before DAVIS, DUHÉ and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Plaintiff Thomas Craig ( “Craig”) brought action against his

former employer, Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. (“Ryder”) for disability

discrimination in violation of his rights under the Americans With

Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and the Family Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”).

Craig further sought action against Ryder for inte ntional

infliction of emotional distress. The United States District Court2

for the Northern District of Texa s, Dallas Division, granted

summary judgment in favor of Ryder. The district court also denied

Craig's motion for leave to file amended response. Craig now

appeals. We affirm.

In 1977, Ryder hired Craig to work at its facility in Oxnard,

California. In the Fall of 1995, Craig accepted a position at

Ryder's facility in Lewisville, Texa s and transferred to Texas.

Craig, however, did not report to work in Lewisville, claiming he

suffered from depression. Ryder ultimately terminated Craig's

employment in December, 1995.

Craig asserts the district court abus ed its discretion by

excluding proffered summary judgment evidence. We disagree. The

district court con sidered Craig's evidence and found it

insufficient to meet his burden to avoid summary judgment.

Craig also asserts the dist rict court abused its discretion

when it denied Craig's Motion for Leave to File Amended Response.

A district court does not abuse its discretion in refusing to

co nsider evidence submitted in a post-judgment motion after the

entry of summary judgment. S ee Wallace v. Texas Tech Univ., 8 0

F.3d 1042, 10 52 (5th Cir. 1996). In addition, Craig has not

offered any explanation or excuse for failing to present sufficient

evidence prior to the district co urt's ruling. S ee id. T he

district court did not abuse its discretion.

We find no merit in Craig's claims that the district court

abused its discretion in: (1) excluding evidence and (2) denying

Craig's Motion for Leave to File Amended Response. For the3

foregoing reasons, the district court's judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of Brooklyn Federal Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Angelo J. Di Lorenzo, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.



Date:  February 13, 2007

/s/ Angelo J. Di Lorenzo
------------------------
Angelo J. Di Lorenzo
President and Chief Executive Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-11093

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DAMIAN CHUKWUMA, 

also known as Kristopher Aaron,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:97-CR-104-D

- - - - - - - - - -

July 29, 1998

Before DUHE’, EMILIO M. GARZA and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Damian Chukwuma appeals his convictions for use of a false

Social Security number, wire fraud, and money laundering. He

argues that the district court should have granted his motion for

new trial based on three affidavits attested to after the trial

by Juanito Peralto, a government witness, in which Peralto

allegedly recants his trial testimony. Chukwuma argues that
No. 97-11093

-2-

Peralto’s trial testimony had a substantial effect on the jury’s

guilty verdict and that the evidence in his affidavits would

have, in all reasonable probability, changed the outcome of the

verdict.

Peralto’s affidavits do not substantially change anything

that Peralto said at trial. Chukwuma has not shown that the

evidence would probably produce an acquittal. The district court

did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for new trial. 

United States v. Time, 21 F.3d 635, 642-43 (5th Cir. 1994).

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002

Each of the undersigned, Aylwin B. Lewis, Chief Executive Officer and President of Sears Holdings Corporation (the
Company) and William C. Crowley, Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer of the Company, has executed this certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended November 3, 2007 (the Report).

Each of the undersigned hereby
certifies that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

November 30, 2007



|                                                                                   
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                   
|/s/ Aylwin B. Lewis                                                                
|Aylwin B. Lewis                                                                    
|Chief Executive Officer and President                                              
|                                                                                   
|/s/ William C. Crowley                                                             
|William C. Crowley                                                                 
|Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer (Chief Financial Officer)