alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
February 27 , 2014



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

THE ESTATE OF MARGAR ET KLOVENSKI, JAKE K LOVENSKI, AND MARY HASSLER, INDIVI DUALLY AND AS NEXT F RIENDS , Appellant s
NO . 14

- 13

- 00850

- CV V.

DR. ASHISH KAPOOR , Appellee

________________________________ Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on June 19, 2013. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellant s , The Estate of Margaret Klovenski, Jake Klovenski, and Mary Hassler, Individually and as next Frien ds , jointly and severally

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Michael FERGUSON, Appellant.

No. WD 49706.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

June 27, 1995.

Emmett D. Queener, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Michelle A. Freund, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before HANNA, P.J., and BERREY and SPINDEN, JJ.

*278ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from conviction of sodomy, § 566.060, RSMo 1994, and sentence of twenty years. Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5728 

To direct the Congressional Budget Office to submit daily reports during 

the period in which a Government shutdown is in effect on the effects 

of the shutdown on the economy and the costs of the shutdown to 

taxpayers, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 26, 2023 

Ms. PEREZ (for herself and Mr. NUNN of Iowa) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To direct the Congressional Budget Office to submit daily 

reports during the period in which a Government shutdown is in effect on the effects of the shutdown on 

the economy and the costs of the shutdown to taxpayers, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Government Shutdown 

5 Impact Report Act of 2023’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5728 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPORTS BY CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE ON 

2 ECONOMIC COSTS AND COSTS TO TAXPAYERS 

3 OF GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN. 

4 Not later than 24 hours after each day on which a 

5 Government shutdown is in effect, the Director of the 

6 Congressional Budget Office shall submit a report to Con7 gress containing information on each of the following, 

8 based on the most recent information available to the Di9 rector: 

10 (1) An estimate of the economic output lost on 

11 that day as the result of the Government shutdown. 

12 (2) An estimate of any decrease in gross domes13 tic product for the quarter that will occur as the re14 sult of the Government shutdown. 

15 (3) The value of any assistance, including loans, 

16 grants, and contracts, that the Small Business Ad17 ministration was unable to provide as the result of 

18 the Government shutdown. 

19 (4) The amount of any revenue for the National 

20 Park Service that was lost on that day as the result 

21 of the closure of National Park Service lands and 

22 historic sites. 

23 (5) An estimate of revenue lost on that day be24 cause of the effects of the Government shutdown on 

25 tourism and travel to and within the United States, 

26 including travel by foreign tourists. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 5728 IH

1 SEC. 3. DETERMINATION OF GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN. 

2 For purposes of this Act, a Government shutdown 

3 shall be considered to be in effect if there is a lapse in 

4 appropriations for any Federal agency or department as 

5 a result of a failure to enact a regular appropriations bill 

6 or continuing resolution. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
RESTATED 1995
</LEGEND>
   <MULTIPLIER>       1,000

   <S>                                 <C>
   <PERIOD-TYPE>                       12-MOS
   <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1995
   <PERIOD-END>                                    DEC-31-1995
   <CASH>                                               10,530
   <SECURITIES>                                              0
   <RECEIVABLES>                                        28,022
   <ALLOWANCES>                                            247
   <INVENTORY>                                               0
   <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     42,859
   <PP&E>                                               16,988
   <DEPRECIATION>                                        6,832
   <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       86,781
   <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                27,178
   <BONDS>                                               2,021
   <COMMON>                                                 94
   <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
   <PREFERRED>                                               0
   <OTHER-SE>                                           51,132
   <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         86,781
   <SALES>                                             113,095
   <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    113,095
   <CGS>                                                48,431
   <TOTAL-COSTS>                                        96,626
   <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       (646)
   <LOSS-PROVISION>                                         39
   <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      318
   <INCOME-PRETAX>                                      16,797
   <INCOME-TAX>                                          6,172
   <INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   9,159
   <DISCONTINUED>                                            0
   <EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
   <CHANGES>                                                 0
   <NET-INCOME>                                          9,159
   <EPS-PRIMARY>                                           .49
   <EPS-DILUTED>                                           .48

<FN>
* Information has been prepared in accordance with SFAS No. 128, basic and
  diluted EPS have been provided in place of primary and fully diluted,
  respectively.
</FN>

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary data extracted from the Consolidated Balance
Sheet as of December 31, 1997 and the Consolidated Statement of Income for the
twelve months ended December 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          11,608
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                51,381
<PP&E>                                          47,673
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,364
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 919,767
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,033
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           141
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   919,767
<SALES>                                        158,103
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               166,797
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  123,635
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,326
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 43,162
<INCOME-TAX>                                    17,008
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    25,703
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.99



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Annual Report of Walnut Valley Ventures, Inc. on
Form  10-KSB  for the  period  ending  December  31,  2002,  as  filed  with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, B.
Stephen Bailey, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


                             /S/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President, Director
(Principal Executive Officer)


April 19, 2004


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 31.1

                            SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION


I, Cecil Morris, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of LEGALPLAY
     ENTERTAINMENT INC.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this annual report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statement, and other financial
     information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     (a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which the annual report is
          being prepared;

     (b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     (c)  presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation of the Evaluation Date;

5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
     committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
     equivalent function):

     (a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weakness in
          internal controls; and

     (b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual
report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



/s/ Cecil Morris                            Date: March 31, 2006
----------------------------------
Cecil Morris
Director, President / Secretary
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-15-00078-CV

Brian FREEMAN,

Appellant

v.

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY,

Appellee

From the 63rd Judicial District Court, Edwards County, Texas

Trial Court No. 3724

The Honorable Robert Hoffman, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 1, 2015

MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; DISMISSED

Appellant filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. We grant the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.1(a)(1). Because the motion does not disclose an agreement of the parties regarding the 

assessment of costs, we order all costs assessed against appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d)

(absent agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against appellant).

PER CURIAM
#### Robert E. KROECK, Respondent, v. Carol Ardyce KROECK, Appellant.

No. WD 40752.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

July 25, 1989.

James Armin Rust, Lexington, for appellant.

Robert E. Harris, Warrensburg, for respondent.

Before SHANGLER, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and NUGENT, JJ.

*514ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from property allocation order and periodic maintenance award of marital dissolution decree.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, June 22, 2021, 10:00 a.m. to June 22, 2021, 08:00 p.m., National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on May 18, 2021, 86 FR 26931.                

                    Lawrence Kagemann, Ph.D.,                     *Larry.Kagemann@Nih.Gov,*                     (301) 480-6849, will be the new Contact person, replacing Inna Gorshkova as Scientific Review Officer. The meeting date and location remain the same. The meeting is closed to the public.                

David W. Freeman,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-11879 Filed 6-4-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>1,000
       
<S>                                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                          YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                               DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                                    DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                                                5,134
<SECURITIES>                                                            228
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         5,341
<ALLOWANCES>                                                            375
<INVENTORY>                                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                          0
<PP&E>                                                                    0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                       34,797
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                     0
<BONDS>                                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                                               0
<COMMON>                                                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                                                           23,907
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                         34,797
<SALES>                                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                      6,488
<CGS>                                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                         4,515
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                        487
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                    1,085
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                       1,973
<INCOME-TAX>                                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                   1,973
<DISCONTINUED>                                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                                          1,973
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                          1.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                             0
        

</TABLE>
SUBSIDIARIES

     1.   e-Auction Global Trading Inc. (Barbados), a Barbados corporation,
          wholly-owned by the Company

     2.   Aucxis Corp. (Canada), a Canadian corporation, wholly-owned by
          e-Auction Global Trading Inc. (Barbados)

     3.   Aucxis Corp., a Belgium Company, wholly-owned by the Company

     4.   Schelfhout Computer Systemen N.V., a Belgium corporation, wholly-owned
          by Aucxis Corp. (Belgium)

     5.   SDL Invest N.V., a Belgian corporation incorporated March 22, 2000, in
          which the Company has a 9% ownership interest.

     6.   v-Wholesaler N.V. (a holding company), wholly-owned by the Company,
          which holding company has a 100% ownership interest in Kwatrobox B.V.,
          which in turn includes 100% of Palm Veilingsystemenn b.v., 100% of
          Nieaf Systems b.v., 100% of Automatiseringsbureau and 80% pf Palm b.v.
          Scoop Software b.v.

     7.   i-Three Inc., wholly-owned by the Company

     8.   Aucxis Ltd., a company publicly traded on the Australian Stock
          Exchange, in which the Company has a 48.2% ownership interest
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-40726

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CHARLTON RAY MCDONALD

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:06-CR-286-ALL

Before KING, DAVIS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Charlton Ray McDonald pleaded guilty to the possession of child

pornography and was sentenced to 120 months of imprisonment and three years

of supervised release.

He argues on appeal that the district court erred in denying his motion to

withdraw his guilty plea. He contends that he was entitled to have his plea

withdrawn because his counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate or advise

him concerning the defense of necessity before advising him to plead guilty.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 4, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-40726

2

When determining whether to allow a defendant to withdraw his guilty

plea, the district court should consider whether: (1) the defendant has asserted

his innocence,(2) withdrawal would prejudice the Government, (3) the defendant

has delayed in filing his withdrawal motion, (4) withdrawal would substantially

inconvenience the court, (5) close assistance of counsel was available, (6) the

original plea was knowing and voluntary, and (7) withdrawal would waste

judicial resources. United States v. Carr, 740 F.2d 339, 343-44 (5th Cir. 1984).

McDonald has not shown that the district court abused its discretion in

determining that he was not entitled under the Carr factors to have his guilty

plea withdrawn. See United States v. Powell, 354 F.3d 362, 370 (5th Cir. 2003);

Carr, 740 F.2d at 343-44.

AFFIRMED.