alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Accentia Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) for the three months ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form
10-Q), I, Alan M. Pearce, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: August 16, 2010



|                                 
|---------------------------------
|/s/ Alan M. Pearce               
|Alan M. Pearce                   
|Chief Financial Officer; Director

This certification
accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Accentia Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 72 (Friday, April 14, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 19084]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9227]




-----------------------------------------------------------------------


INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION

Release of Waybill Data

    The Commission has received a request from Sidley & Austin counsel 
for Canadian Pacific Rail System (CPRS) for permission to use certain 
data from the 1993 and 1994 I.C.C. Waybill Samples. A copy of the 
request (WB471--4/05/95) may be obtained from the I.C.C. Office of 
Economic and Environmental Analysis.
    The waybill sample contains confidential railroad and shipper data; 
therefore, if any parties object to this request, they should file 
their objections with the Director of the Commission's Office of 
Economic and Environmental Analysis within 14 calendar days of the date 
of this notice. The rules for release of waybill data are codified at 
49 CFR 1244.8.
    Contact: James A. Nash, (202) 927-6196.

Vernon A. Williams,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95-9227 Filed 4-13-95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7035-01-P
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6658

SGRE, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
|          |
|---------------|
| **Exhibit 8** |

----

Back to Contents

|                                 |
|--------------------------------------|
| **List of significant subsidiaries** |

The table below provides details of the principal subsidiaries of Avecia Group plc:

|                                 |   |   | **Country of incorporation** |   |   | **Principal activity** |   |   | **Percentage of      equity owned** |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|--------|------------------------------|--------|--------|------------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------------------|--------|
| ***Subsidiary        undertakings*** |   |   |                         |   |   |                   |   |   |                                |   |
| Avecia Investments        Limited    |   |   | UK                           |   |   | Holding company        |   |   | 100%*                               |   |
| Avecia UK        Holdings Limited    |   |   | UK                           |   |   | Holding company        |   |   | 100%*                               |   |
| Avecia Limited                       |   |   | UK                           |   |   | Chemical manufacture   |   |   | 100%*                               |   |
| Avecia Holdings        BV            |   |   | The Netherlands              |   |   | Holding company        |   |   | 100%*                               |   |
| Avecia Holdings        Inc.          |   |   | USA                          |   |   | Holding company        |   |   | 100%*                               |   |
| Avecia BV                            |   |   | The Netherlands              |   |   | Chemical manufacture   |   |   | 100%*                               |   |
| Avecia Inc.                          |   |   | USA                          |   |   | Chemical manufacture   |   |   | 100%*                               |   |
| NeoResins        Inc.                |   |   | USA                          |   |   | Chemical manufacture   |   |   | 100%*                               |   |
| Avecia Biotechnology        Inc.     |   |   | USA                          |   |   | Chemical manufacture   |   |   | 100%*                               |   |
| Avecia Spain        SL               |   |   | Spain                        |   |   | Chemical manufacture   |   |   | 100%*                               |   |
| ***Joint        ventures***          |   |   |                         |   |   |                   |   |   |                                |   |
| Image Polymers        Europe         |   |   | UK                           |   |   | Chemical manufacture   |   |   | 50%¤                         |   |
| Image Polymers        Company        |   |   | USA                          |   |   | Chemical manufacture   |   |   | 50%¤                         |   |

|   |                     |
|--------|--------------------------|
| *      | all ordinary shares held |

| ¤ | represents percentage share of limited        partnership |
|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------|

 

**Registered number: 3768265**

 

----
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 77 (Friday, April 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 19880]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9864]

========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 77 / Friday, April 21, 1995 / 
Notices
[[Page 19880]]

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service

Zulu Smoot EIS; Kootenai National Forest; Lincoln County, 
Montana; Cancellation of Environmental Impact Statement

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Environmental impact statement cancellation notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Notice is hereby given that the Three Rivers Ranger District, 
Kootenai National Forest is withdrawing its plan to prepare an 
Environmental Impact Statement for the Zulu Smoot project. A portion of 
the project proposal within this area will be incorporated into the 
South Fork Yaak Environmental Impact Statement for fire and insect 
mortality recovery.
    The Notice of Intent, published in the Federal Register of January 
14, 1994 (59 FR 2353) is hereby rescinded (FR document is FR 94-915 
Filed 1-13-94).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jack Zearfoss, South Fork Yaak EIS 
Team Leader, Three Rivers Ranger District (406) 295-4693.
Robert L. Schrenk,
Forest Supervisor, Kootenai National Forest.
[FR Doc. 95-9864 Filed 4-20-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
```
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WILFREDO SANTOS CAMACHO,

Petitioner,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney

General,

Respondent. No. 19

- 70573

Agency No. A088

- 722

- 031

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 21, 2021 * *

Before: SILVERMAN , WATFORD, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Wilfredo Santos Camacho, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration A ppeals’ order dismissing his app eal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying h is application for deferral of removal under

the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have juris diction under 8 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUN 24 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 19

- 70573

§ 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings

, applying

the standards governing adverse credibility determinatio ns under the REAL ID

Act. Shrestha v. Holder , 590 F.3d 1034, 1039

- 40 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the

petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination

ba sed on inconsistencies in Santos Camacho’s testimony as to the circumstances of

his cousin’s murder and which family members reside in Mexico

, and

inconsistencies between his testimony and documentary evidence as to his entries

to and departures from the United States. See Shrestha , 590 F.3d at 1048 (adverse

credibility determination reasonable under “ the totality of the circumstances ” )

.

Santos Camacho’s explanations do not compel a contrary conclusion. See Lata v.

INS , 204 F.3d 1241, 1245 (9th Cir. 2000).

Substantial evidence also supports t he agency’s denial of Santos Camacho’s

CAT claim because it was based on the same testimony the agency found not

credible, and Santos Camacho does not point to any other evidence in the record

that compels the conclusion that it is more likely than not he would be tortured by

or with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to Mexico. See

Shrestha , 590 F.3d at 1048

- 49

.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Confidential – Execution Document





Addendum
V to


SOW
8 to BDA No. N-A-1





This
ADDENDUM amends and supplements the SOW 8 to BDA No. N-A-1, effective August 17,
1999 (“Agreement”) between [************]1 and Peerless
Systems Corporation, previously having its principal place of business at 2381
Rosecrans Avenue, Suite 400, El Segundo, CA 90245 (“Customer”).  The
parties acknowledge that Peerless’ principal place of business is presently 2361
Rosecrans Avenue, Suite 440, El Segundo, CA 90245.





The
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, except that it shall be
modified as set forth in this Addendum.  Any capitalized terms which
are not defined in this Addendum shall have the meaning set forth in the
Agreement.  Should a conflict arise between this Addendum and the
Agreement, the provisions of this Addendum shall control.





The
parties hereby agree that the Agreement shall be and hereby is modified as
follows:





[************]1





IN WITNESS WHEREOF,each of
the parties hereto has caused this Addendum to be executed by duly authorized
representatives of the parties.





SIGNATURE[************]1
            
            Peerless
      Systems CorporationSignature:
      /s/ Edward
      GaughanName:
      Edward
    GaughanTitle:
      PresidentDate:
      April 5,
    2009








1 Material
omitted pursuant to Confidentiality Treatment Request with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
#### Lee E. DAVIS and Bertha L. Davis, Respondents-Appellants v. Mike BAUER and Diana Bauer, d/b/a Mike Bauer Construction Company, Appellants-Respondents.

No. WD 41462.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Jan. 30, 1990.

Thomas T. Wood and Larry G. Chipman, Independence, for appellants.

Elvin S. Douglas, Jr. and Aaron L. Au-rand, Harrisonville, for respondents.

Before SHANGLER, P.J., and TURNAGE and KENNEDY, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The defendant Mike Bauer appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in a breach of contract action which returned damages in favor of the plaintiffs Davis after the court directed a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs on the issue of the liability of Mike Bauer only. The plaintiffs cross-appeal from the judgment entered on the jury verdict in favor of the defendant Diana Bauer.

The motion by the plaintiffs for sanctions against the defendants for frivolous appeal is denied.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 99.4

Press Release

INTERPOOL, INC. TO PAY CASH DIVIDEND ON COMMON STOCK

PRINCETON, N.J., March 20, 2003 - Interpool, Inc. (NYSE: IPX)
announced today that it will pay a cash dividend of $.0625 cents per share for
the first quarter of 2003. The dividend will be payable on April 15, 2003 to
shareholders of record on April 1, 2003. The aggregate amount of the dividend is
expected to be approximately $1,700,000. The amount of the quarterly dividend is
based on an indicated annualized dividend rate of 25 cents per share.

Interpool is one of the world's leading suppliers of equipment
and services to the transportation industry. It is the world's largest lessor of
intermodal container chassis and a world-leading lessor of cargo containers used
in international trade. Interpool operates from over 240 locations throughout
the world.

This Press Release contains certain forward-looking statements
regarding future circumstances. These forward-looking statements are subject to
risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially
from those contemplated in such forward-looking statements, including in
particular the risks and uncertainties described in the company's SEC filings.
The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly release any revisions to these
forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date
hereof.

For Interpool Inc.
Contact:
Mitchell Gordon
Executive Vice President &
Chief Financial Officer
(212) 916-3284
mgordon@interpool.com
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6336

CW Bearing USA, Inc:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
**Exhibit 32(b)**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the filing of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Alpha
      Natural Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30,
      2006, with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, David C. Stuebe, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1)
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350
      and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
      document.


/s/
                David C. StuebeDavid
                C. Stuebe*Vice
                President and Chief Financial Officer**(Principal
                Financial Officer)*


Date:
      November 9, 2006




A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.






-40-
EMHM^OCL VbKl K\XtKi fcvKKYS 4 iVi TV\E_ CovACLT of THE. STftTE. or T£*fcS & Of TEXAS

To tiAe Ubvioak^Lt caatn of c(L\navmk\. appeal o^ texjvs'. Corner v>ui-o VK« apfteMortA / p«,-A\'A-\0A€r \a ~vW aW>^ sA^led ckr\c\ fsurvN\mr-eA cause or\di fe^peei^CLVVv* <v\ou«?s VY\\S 

### VV*\ora\n\« CoaA Vo aforA a Ce\\eaC\t\^ &P appe\\oj\ANs peAr\V\0r> Q?r ck\scXeV\oagiCva fevKeo. and \jn su.$pocA V\\enLoQ LuouSti sXuu> 

## 4W courA AW ftl\uu)\\\^.? \. The *s\v^€ oad wuocOcwr ftr -VW peAs-Wrt &k \*b: £.(V\<v\cv\ue\ Voa k\Y*v&va\s \j. TY\e SAqVc o£ Texas > PPU- Kio. 2. Ta€ appe\\GA.A mesoe^ A«V\\^ UocxcraVW Cc>u>tY \a Ata 

### r\a«Y\e bP \UvV\cc A-o cyat\A ce.V\ear\f\^ Wcause. ArW. Cbui\ of 

### A^teaU Yvu Se\ a sAandard e>P ^CgWU<\<^ AW parameAu^ of

AvtA\c\t: bk.Q°"D uA\\cW VAJouAd aWowj proSecuWs. -Au ojaWu* 

### ViuWVia* AWs sAciWk. uxA'k \.y\^ua^Av^. h. The apf«.^cw\A a.6St.cAs -AYvaA \m*» ^uW^Aq«\V<q\ r\^KH lo^re vnoWAuJi u^d«/ VW «iA-a/\eiardk SeA ^orAW urv^tr VLeMeakoS \J. LWAtid S\aAi<> > LU 'S^. \339 fmV> GrxX vV\ CdaPUclA. u^vVK

COURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALS MAR 042015 AbelAcosta,Clerk

### VJWi€fere. Pf&Aise^ doA<§\^ececl^>: -Wssl A^cWeavV /PeAC-Worter 

## TespecA^LU^ feo^uesA ^Wa\ AA\\S WocNCKaVA^ Cooo-A ^ToaA <\ re.Y\«<kfvf\a an> app-«,\\6r\A^ pe/WA-icjA &>r c^tecfe.Wa&^ feov^K) 

### jle^p&J'&Al^ SaW-H-**^> ^M<V\QAAJk/\ \1ca (\\W\ £.V<2A«i.YfcS#> QfViUJdCA Aje<L.\aifaTvcA X ^rrs<vsci^u,€.\\1da k\W Evca^ , Tfot3 no". 19^,3^IcS , be\\\a 

### pCes<frvV\^ \«\carcer<xA-ecji aA 4W ft^rrv^ \e\wdl U/\{\ i TfaCT-iO> 

### aA&auj\<. Ce^Avy TexQS • U€.{<$^ cwvdl c&€c\a« uv\d^r p^nalAu 

### c>$ pervufVA ^WtA 4A\e Q>f<cy>\Ag -sVaAe/nenAs ore Wvx<. Of%cA CotfecJt- V\> 4Vfi W^A o£ nr\v^ \CnuuAe'c)q« . 

### Ex^Om-k^l ^r\ -V\\\S UAVn \ku^ of (t\ortA 2o\S

-
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 76 (Thursday, April 20, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19771-19772]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9781]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION

[Finance Docket No. 32682]


RailTex, Inc.--Corporate Family Transaction Exemption--Georgia 
and Alabama Lines, South Carolina Central Railroad Co., Inc. and 
Georgia Southwestern Railroad, Inc.

    RailTex, Inc. (RailTex), South Carolina Central Railroad Co., Inc. 
(SCC), and Georgia Southwestern Railroad, Inc. (GSWR), have filed a 
notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(3) for a corporate family 
transaction.
    RailTex, a noncarrier corporation, controls through stock 
ownership: (1) SCC, a class III shortline rail carrier; and (2) GSWR, a 
noncarrier company.
    SCC currently operates about 56 miles of railroad in South 
Carolina. SCC also owns three railroad lines in Georgia and Alabama: 
(1) Georgia Southwestern Division, extending from Rochelle, GA to 
Mahrt, AL, and from Columbus to Bainbridge, GA; (2) Georgia & Alabama 
Division, extending from Smithville, GA [[Page 19772]] to White Oak, 
AL; and (3) Georgia Great Southern Division, extending from Dawson to 
Albany, GA. The railroad lines in Georgia and Alabama are separately 
managed as divisions of SCC.
    As part of a corporate restructuring, SCC will transfer to GSWR its 
interests in the railroad lines in Georgia and Alabama. SCC and GSWR 
will function as separate corporate entities, with separate revenue 
centers, and each will be managed, administered, directed, and 
accounted for separately. The parties intended to consummate on or 
about April 1, 1995.
    This is a transaction within a corporate family of the type 
specifically exempted from prior approval under 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(3) 
because it will not result in adverse changes in service levels, 
significant operational changes, or a change in the competitive balance 
with carriers outside the corporate family.
    As a condition to use of this exemption, any employees adversely 
affected by the transaction will be protected by the conditions set 
forth in New York Dock Ry.--Control--Brooklyn Eastern Dist., 360 I.C.C. 
60 (1979). Imposition of labor protective conditions is mandatory for 
transactions under 49 U.S.C. 11343.
    Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10505(d) may be 
filed at any time. The filing of a petition to revoke will not stay the 
exemption's effectiveness. Pleadings must be filed with the Commission 
and served on: Michael W. Blaszak, 211 South Leitch Ave., LaGrange, IL 
60525.

    Decided: April 14, 1995.

    By the Commission, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-9781 Filed 4-19-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7035-01-P
#### Kimberly Marie STONE, Appellant, v. Russell David SMEDLEY, Respondent.

No. WD 51179.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Jan. 9, 1996.

Patrick Mark Reidy, Kansas City, for Appellant.

Anthony A. Stein, Kansas City, for Respondent.

Before FENNER, C.J., P.J., and BRECKENRIDGE and SMITH, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from judgment dismissing cause of action for breach of oral agreement and equitable relief.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).