alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### DEL MONTE DUNES AT MONTEREY, LTD., et al., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF MONTEREY, Defendant-Appellant. DEL MONTE DUNES AT MONTEREY, LTD., and Monterey-Del Monte Dunes Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF MONTEREY, Defendant-Appellee.

Nos. 94-16248, 94-16313.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Oct. 28, 1997.

Before: WALLACE and LEAVY, Circuit Judges, and BAIRD,* District Judge.

*

 Honorable Lourdes G. Baird, United States District Judge, Central District of California, sitting by designation,

The panel reheard oral argument in this case August 6,1996. The panel has voted not to amend its opinion. The panel has unanimously recommended that the suggestion for rehearing en banc be rejected.

The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc. An active judge called for an en banc vote and a majority of the judges of the court has voted to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35(b).

The opinion in this case will not be amended, and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is rejected.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gloria Ellis, Also Known as Diane Graham, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Kuffner, J.), rendered April 7, 1989, convicting her of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the court improperly imposed a greater sentence than that which had been promised was not preserved for appellate review as she neither objected to the sentence as violative of the sentence commitment nor moved to vacate her plea *(see, People v Moore,*155 AD2d 696; *People v Ifill,*108 AD2d 202). In any event, a review of the record discloses that the original plea agreement was modified, with the consent and knowledge of the defendant and the prosecutor, at a subsequent hearing on the defendant’s application to be released on her own recognizance pending sentence, in order to enable her to visit her gravely ill sister and to begin a drug rehabilitation program. Bail had been previ*702ously set at $10,000. In determining the application, the court properly considered, pursuant to CPL 510.30 (2) (a), alternative "kind[s] and degreefs] of control or restriction” that were necessary to secure the defendant’s attendance at sentence. To accomplish this purpose, the court clearly conditioned the promised sentence, *inter alia,*upon the defendant’s appearance on the date scheduled for sentencing and upon her cooperation with a T.A.S.C. (Treatment Alternatives to Street Crime) caseworker, including her enrollment and attendance in a drug rehabilitation program. The defendant acknowledged that she understood that if she did not comply with these conditions, the court would impose a harsher sentence than that promised in consideration of her plea of guilty. Thereafter, the defendant failed to fulfill either condition and she was arrested on a bench warrant. The proffered explanation for her noncompliance was incredible, unsubstantiated and insufficient. Accordingly, the court was free to impose a more severe sentence, which was not excessive *(see, People v Moore, supra; People v Caridi,*148 AD2d 625; *People v Betheny,*147 AD2d 488; *People v Raife,*146 AD2d 652; *cf., People v Rosenberg,*148 AD2d 346; *People v Clarke,*145 AD2d 565; *People v Annunziata,*105 AD2d 709; *see also, Innes v Dalsheim,*864 F2d 974). Mangano, P. J., Kunzeman, Rubin and Balletta, JJ., concur.
#### INNOVATIVE OFFICE SYSTEMS, INC. v. Jim JOHNSON d/b/a Electro-Image.

No. 95-0802.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Nov. 22, 1995.

*388ORDER

Upon joint motion, this Court grants the application for writ of error without reference to the merits, sets aside the judgments of the court of appeals and the trial court without reference to the merits, and remands the cause to the trial court for entry of judgment in accordance with the settlement agreement of the parties.
# Four th Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 27, 2017

No. 04

- 16

- 00690

- CV

Cody A. WATERS

, Appellant

v.

Beth T. WATERS

, Appellee

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016

- CI

- 09528

Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr., Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel is hereby DENIED.

_________________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 27th day of February, 2017

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 58 (Monday, March 27, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15791-15792]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7476]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-24,446]

Litton Industrial Automation Systems, Inc., New Britain Machine, 
New Britain, CT, and Operating in the Following State, TA-W-24,446A 
Texas; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker 
Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 USC 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on July 27, 1990, applicable to 
all workers of the subject firm. The certification notice was published 
in the Federal Register on August 9, 1990 (55 FR 32504).
    At the request of one of the workers, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The findings show an 
installation and sales office in Houston, Texas which experienced a 
decline in demand for its services from the subject firm.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers [[Page 15792]] who were adversely affected by increased 
imports. Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to 
include the operations in Texas.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-24,446 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers and former workers of Litton Industrial Automation 
Systems, Incorporated (New Britain Machine), New Britain, 
Connecticut and operating in the state of Texas who became totally 
or partially separated from employment on or after September 10, 
1989 are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 
223 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, D.C., this 14th day of March 1995.
Victor J. Trunzo,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 95-7476 Filed 3-24-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
```
<Page>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.01

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with this quarterly report of ML Aspect FuturesAccess LLC (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this "Report"), I, Robert M.
Alderman, Chief Executive Officer, President and Manager of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: August 12, 2005
-----------------------

By /s/ ROBERT M. ALDERMAN
   ----------------------
Robert M. Alderman
Chief Executive Officer, President and Manager
(Principal Executive Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 68 (Monday, April 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 18085]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8902]



========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 68 / Monday, April 10, 1995 / 
Notices
[[Page 18085]]

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Food Safety and Inspection Service
[Docket No. 95-012C]


National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria for 
Foods; Meeting; Correction

    This notice revises the information provided in the Federal 
Register notice (60 FR 17313) published on April 5, 1995, (FR Doc. 95-
8237). The meeting of the National Advisory Committee on 
Microbiological Criteria for Foods will extend over three days, rather 
than the two previously announced. Therefore, the meeting will be held 
from 1:00 PM to 5:00 PM on April 17 and from 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM on 
April 18 and 19 at the Arlington Renaissance Hotel, 950 North Stafford 
Street, Arlington, VA 22203, (703) 528-6000.
    Additionally, the meeting agenda will include a briefing and 
preliminary discussion of FSIS' ``Pathogen Reduction; Hazard Analysis 
and Critical Control Points (HACCP) Systems'' (60 FR 6774) proposed 
rulemaking. A meeting of the Advisory Committee will be held prior to 
the closing of the comment period for a full discussion of the proposed 
rulemaking. The correct meeting agenda for the April meeting is as 
follows:

I. Ethics Training
II. Raw Poultry Labeled Fresh
III. Discussion of the ``Pathogen Reduction; Hazard Analysis and 
Critical Control Points (HACCP) Systems'' proposed rulemaking
IV. Working group meetings for meat and poultry, and seafood
V. Future Topics
VI. Public Comments

    Comments should be addressed to: Mr. Craig Fedchock, Advisory 
Committee Specialist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and 
Inspection Service, Room 311, 1255 22nd Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20250-3700. Background materials and the meeting agenda are available 
for inspection by contacting Mr. Fedchock on (202) 254-2517.

    Done at Washington, DC, on: April 6, 1995.
Michael R. Taylor,
Administrator, Food Safety and Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 95-8902 Filed 4-6-95; 3:43 pm]
BILLING CODE 3410-DM-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         NIDCR Special Grants Review Committee.                    

*Date:*                         June 17-18, 2021.                    

*Time:*                         9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                              ( print page 29271)    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Latarsha J. Carithers, Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-4859,                         *latarsha.carithers@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.121, Oral Diseases and Disorders Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: May 26, 2021.

Melanie J. Pantoja,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-11495 Filed 5-28-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
EXHIBIT
31.1




CERTIFICATION
OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 302


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I,
Richard Man Fai LEE, certify that:




1.           I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period
ended March 31, 2006 of China Premium Lifestyle Enterprise, Inc.




2.           Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report.




3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report.




4.           The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




a.           designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;




b.           evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and




c.           disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.




5.           The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




a.           all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




b.           any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.




Date: May
28, 2010





/s/ Richard Man Fai LEERichard
      Man Fai LEEChief
      Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1









Principal Executive Officers Certification Pursuant To

Section 1350

(furnished, not filed)









In connection with the Annual Report of GeoGlobal Resources Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jean Paul Roy, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Jean Paul Roy







Jean Paul Roy

President and Chief Executive Officer

March 30, 2005
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6299

Nestle Waters North America:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           6,478
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                12,500
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     30,300
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          24,132
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            24,643
<LOANS>                                        125,127
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,756
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 201,856
<DEPOSITS>                                     167,427
<SHORT-TERM>                                     2,735
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                692
<LONG-TERM>                                      8,091
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,700
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,211
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 201,856
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,972
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  793
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   108
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 3,873
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,685
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,855
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,018
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       45
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,149
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    954
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         954
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       716
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     5.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     5.41
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.28
<LOANS-NON>                                        129
<LOANS-PAST>                                       148
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,745
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       51
<RECOVERIES>                                        17
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,756
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,064
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            692
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 78 (Monday, April 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 20095]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9964]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration on Aging


White House Conference on Aging

AGENCY: White House Conference on Aging, AoA, HHS.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to Title II of the Older 
Americans Act Amendments of 1987, Public Law 100-175 as amended by 
Public Law 102-375 and Public Law 103-171, that the 1995 White House 
Conference on Aging Disability Advisory Committee will hold a meeting 
on Tuesday, May 2, 1995. The meeting will be held at the Washington 
Hilton and Towers Hotel on Connecticut Avenue at Columbia Road, NW in 
Washington, DC. More specific information on the time of the meeting 
and the room at the hotel can be obtained by calling the telephone 
number given below.
    The meeting of the Committee shall be open to the public. The 
proposed agenda includes discussion of how the Committee can assist 
with planning for the Conference, and then implementing and reviewing 
it, providing leadership and guidance on disability issues as they 
relate to aging. The committee will focus particularly on post-
conference activities.
    Records shall be kept of all Committee proceedings and shall be 
available for public inspection at 501 School Street SW., 8th Floor, 
Washington, DC 20024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
White House Conference on Aging, 501 School Street SW., 8th Floor, 
Washington, DC 20024; telephone (202) 245-7116.

    Dated: April 18, 1995.
Fernando M. Torres-Gil,
Assistant Secretary for Aging.
[FR Doc. 95-9964 Filed 4-21-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4130-02-M