alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6753

FluiDyne Fluid Power:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7301

Senqcia Maxco, Ltd:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-7537

BYD Motors Inc: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
#### Joseph LANASA, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

No. 63419.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Sept. 7, 1993.

S. Paige Canfield, St. Louis, for mov-ant/appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 Motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sonoma College, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David
H. Weaver, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ David H. Weaver
------------------------
David H. Weaver
Chief Financial Officer
May 22, 2006
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                STATE OF
                                                                PERCENTAGE    INCORPORATION
                                                                    OF             OR
           PARENT                        SUBSIDIARY              OWNERSHIP    ORGANIZATION
----------------------------   ------------------------------   -----------   -------------
 
<S>                            <C>                              <C>           <C>
Fort Bend Holding Corp.        Fort Bend Federal Savings               100%   Federal
                               and Loan Association of
                               Rosenberg
 
Fort Bend Federal Savings      Fairview, Inc.                          100%   Texas
and Loan Association of
Rosenberg
 
Fort Bend Federal              Mitchell Mortgage                        51%   Texas
Savings and Loan               Corporation,
Association of Rosenberg       L.L.C.
 
 
</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-46319 and
No. 333-72666) and the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 33-66456, No. 33-75374, No. 33-88304,
No. 333-55939 and No. 333-55971) of Firstwave Technologies, Inc. of our report dated April 16, 2001 relating to the financial statements and
financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Atlanta,
GA
March 7, 2003

---

QuickLinks
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-7410

Nissan North America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXHIBIT 22

              
                                   WCI STEEL, INC.

                             Form 10-K October 31, 1997

                         List of Subsidiaries of Registrant


                                                   State of Incorporation
     Name of Subsidiary                                or Organization
     ------------------                            -----------------------    
                      
     Niles Properties, Inc.                                 Ohio
     Youngstown Sinter Company                              Ohio
     WCI Steel Production Control Services Inc.             Ohio
     WCI Steel Metallurgical Services Inc.                  Ohio
     WCI Steel Sales L.P.                                   Ohio
     

     Registrant owns all of the outstanding capital stock of or interests in  
        each of said subsidiaries.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 71 (Thursday, April 13, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 18881]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9295]





                Sunshine Act Meetings



Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 71 / Thursday, April 13, 1995 / 
Sunshine Act Meetings


[[Page 18881]]




FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

DATE AND TIME: Tuesday, April 18, 1995 at 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: 999 E Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:

Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. Sec. 437g.
Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. Sec. 437g, Sec. 438(b), and 
    Title 26, U.S.C.
Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or 
    arbitration.
Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a 
    particular employee.

DATE AND TIME: Thursday, April 20, 1995 at 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: 999 E Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.

STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public.

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:

Correction and Approval of Minutes.
Advisory Opinions:
    AOR 1995-02: Peter H. Rodgers on behalf of New York Mercantile 
        Exchange (NYMEX) and NYMEX Political Action Committee.
    AOR 1995-08: Congressman Bart T. Stupak, Stupak, for Congress, 
Inc.
    AOR 1995-09: Matt Dorsey, Treasurer, on behalf of NewtWatch PAC.
Audit:
    Final Audit Report on Bennett for Senate.
Regulations:
    Presidential Primary and General Election Regulations: Draft 
Final Rules and Explanation and Justification. Continued from 
meeting of April 6, 1995.
Administrative Matters.

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Mr. Ron Harris, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 219-4155.
Marjorie W. Emmons,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 95-9295 Filed 4-11-95; 3:39 pm
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 73 (Monday, April 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 19240]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9425]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Financial Assistance Award: Materials Research, Inc.

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy announces that pursuant to 10 
CFR 600.6(a)(2) it is making a financial assistance award under Grant 
Number DE-FG01-95EE15388 to Materials Research, Inc. The proposed grant 
will provide funding in the estimated amount of $89,500 by the 
Department of Energy for the purpose of saving energy through 
development of the inventor's patented energy efficient process for 
producing powders of metal elements and alloys from aqueous solution. 
This process has the potential to be a more energy efficient method for 
producing metal parts and creating new alloys of metals previously 
regarded as incompatible. This award will be made 14 calendar days 
after publication to allow for public comment.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department of Energy has determined in 
accordance with 10 CFR 600.14(e)(1) that the unsolicited application 
for financial assistance submitted by Materials Research, Inc. is 
meritorious based on the general evaluation required by 10 CFR 
600.14(d) and the proposed project represents a unique idea that would 
not be eligible for financial assistance under a recent, current or 
planned solicitation. The new technology enables the production of 
metal powders for the fabrication of metal parts without requiring 
sintering of materials in the powder production process, and has shown 
success in the production of homogenous powders of metals previously 
regarded as incompatible in alloying. The proposed project is not 
eligible for financial assistance under a recent, current or planned 
solicitation because the funding program, the Energy Related Invention 
Program (ERIP), has been structured since its beginning in 1975 to 
operate without competitive solicitations because the authorizing 
legislation directs ERIP to provide support for worthy ideas submitted 
by the public. The program has never issued and has no plans to issue a 
competitive solicitation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Please write the U.S. Department of 
Energy, Office of Placement and Administration, ATTN: Rose Mason, HR-
531.21, 1000 Independence Ave., S.W., Washington, D.C. 20585.
    The anticipated term of the proposed grant is 24 months from the 
date of award.

    Issued in Washington, D.C. on April 6, 1995.
Lynn Warner,
Contracting Officer, Office of Placement and Administration.
[FR Doc. 95-9425 Filed 4-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. David Noel VIETEN, Defendant/Respondent.

No. 69408.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

April 30, 1996.

Blake R. Fischer, Asst. Pros. Atty., Franklin County, Union, for Appellant.

Daniel E. Leslie, Union, for Respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and GRIMM, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The State of Missouri appeals the dismissal of the driving while intoxicated charge against defendant David Noel Vieten. The trial court found the prosecution of the charge violated the Double Jeopardy Clause because defendant previously had his license administratively suspended.

This case is controlled by the Missouri Supreme Court’s recent decision in *State v. Mayo,*915 S.W.2d 758 (Mo. banc 1996). There, the court held a charge of driving while intoxicated is not barred by Double Jeopardy because the defendant’s license had been administratively suspended. Thus, it reversed the trial court’s dismissal of the charge against the defendant.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22

- 0544 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JUSTIN JAMES SWANSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER**
Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file Appellant’s reply brief and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is given an extension of time until March 29, 2024, to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s reply brief. No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 22 2024

02/22/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0544
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6062

Kyungshin Lear Sales and Engineering LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

“Made in China 2025” or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
#### Mary Weppner et al., on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Appellants, v Blue Cross of Western New York, Inc., Respondent.

Order unanimously affirmed without costs for the reasons stated at Supreme Court, Erie County, Rath, J. Memorandum: We add only that plaintiffs have no right to reimbursement under the policy for that portion of nursing home expense not paid by Medicare and that defendant has no obligation to compensate plaintiffs for *1012that care. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Rath, J.—summary judgment.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Den-man, Balio, Lawton and Lowery, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Deep Field Technologies, Inc. ("the
Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark
Meller, President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:


     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
          the Company.



                                                 Date: August 14, 2006


                                                 By /s/ Mark Meller
                                                    -------------------------
                                                    Mark Meller
                                                    President, Chief Executive
                                                    Officer and Principal
                                                    Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 73 (Monday, April 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19248-19249]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9321]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Project No. 2315-002; Project No. 2331-002; Project No. 2332-003; 
North Carolina and South Carolina]


South Carolina Electric & Gas Company, et al.; Availability of 
Draft Environmental Assessment

April 11, 1995.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission's) 
Regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office 
of Hydropower Licensing has reviewed the applications for new licenses 
for the following three existing hydroelectric Projects, all of which 
are located on the Broad River: (1) The Neal Shoals Project (No. 2315-
002), located in Chester and Union County, South Carolina, near 
Carlisle, SC; (2) the Ninety-Nine Islands Project (No. 2331-002), 
located in Cherokee County, South Carolina near Gaffney, SC; and (3) 
the Gaston Shoals Project (No. 2332-003), located in Cherokee County, 
South Carolina and Cleveland County, North Carolina, near 
[[Page 19249]] Gaffney, SC. The Commission has prepared a Draft 
Multiple Project Environmental Assessment (Draft EA) covering all three 
projects. In the Draft EA, the Commission's staff has analyzed the 
existing and potential future environmental impacts of the projects and 
has concluded that licensing the projects, with appropriate 
environmental protective or enhancement measures, would not constitute 
a major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of 
the human environment.
    Copies of the Draft EA are available for review in the Public 
Reference Branch, Room 3104, of the Commission's offices at 941 North 
Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426.
    Any comments should be filed within 45 days from the date of this 
notice and should be addressed to Lois D. Cashell, Secretary, Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426. For further information, contact Tim Looney, 
Environmental Coordinator, at (202) 219-2852.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-9321 Filed 4-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### WINE AND SPIRITS SPECIALTIES, INC., Respondent, v. BERBIGLIA, INC., Appellant.

No. WD 46992.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Nov. 16, 1993.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Dec. 28, 1993.

Richard E. McFadin, Kansas City, for appellant.

Andrew C. Gately, Kansas City, for respondent.

Before HANNA, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and FENNER, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from judgment, after bench trial, for sums due, plus interest, on merchandise delivered.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).