alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Joseph HILL, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Martin CORCORAN, et al., Respondents/Respondents.

No. 67101.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

March 21, 1995.

Rick Barry, *Clayton, for*appellant.

Craig Biesterfield, Robert Schulz, St. Louis, for respondents.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Hill, Petitioner, appeals from the denial of his application *to recover*disability benefits from the City of Maplewood’s Policemen’s and Firemen’s Retirement Fund, claiming total and permanent disability from a duty-related injury. The Board of Trustees denied Petitioner’s claim, finding Petitioner’s injury was not sustained while performing his duties as a fireman. The Board’s decision was affirmed by the Circuit Court. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs and the record on appeal and find the decision is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. We affirm in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

OBDUELLA DAVID SOTO, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-3491 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed April 4, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County; J. Frank Porter, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Pamela H. Izakowitz, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Michael Schaub, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and CASANUEVA and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULE 13(A)-14(A) OR 15(D)-14(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Louis Ploth, Jr., certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 of
Zonagen, Inc.;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;b)
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation;c)
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of this report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
independent registered public accounting firm and the audit committee of registrants board
of directors:  a)
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. Date: March 30, 2005 By:
    /s/ Louis Ploth, Jr.Louis Ploth, Jr.Vice President, Business Development
and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer)
#### Carl G. SIMS, Claimant, v. HOWARD MOTOR HOMES, Employer, and U.S. Fire Insurance Company, Insurer, Respondents.

No. 62211.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

April 20, 1993.

Thomas Joseph Gregory, St. Louis, for claimant.

John J. Johnson, Jr., St. Louis, for respondent.

Before GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J., and SMITH and STEPHAN, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant, Carl G. Sims, appeals from a final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission. The Commission reversed the awards of the Administrative Law Judge of the Division of Workers’ Compensation and denied claimant compensation for two separate work-related injuries. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs and arguments of the parties, the transcript and the legal file, and can find no error on the part of the Commission. In addition, we find that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. Claimant’s appeal is, therefore, affirmed pursuant to rule 84.16(b). The parties have been provided with a memorandum, solely for their own information, setting out the reasons for our decision.
#### Burmark Motel Corporation, Doing Business as Empire State Motel and Catskill Motor Lodge, Respondent, v Marine Midland Bank, N. A., Appellant, et al., Defendants.

In an action to recover damages, *inter alia,*for conversion and breach of contract, the defendant Marine Midland Bank, N. A., appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Beisner, J.), entered May 12, 1988, as granted that branch of the plaintiff’s motion which was for summary judgment in its favor on the issue of liability.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, with costs, and the motion is denied in its entirety.

The defendant George Wallack managed the plaintiff’s motel from 1969 until 1984. During this period, Wallack indorsed and presented for payment at the defendant Marine Midland Bank, N. A. a series of checks naming "Catskill Motor Lodge”, an assumed name of the corporate plaintiff, as payee. Wallack indorsed these checks in the name of "Catskill Motor Lodge, George Wallack”. In his affidavit, Wallack asserted *431that he had been fully authorized to indorse and cash the checks in question, which allegedly totaled a sum of $78,193.90, for use in the motel’s operation. The plaintiff, through its president Samuel Shulman, has denied ever having given such authorization.

In 1975, the plaintiff opened its account with the defendant bank. Both the banking resolution and signature card on file with the bank indicated that at all material times only Samuel Shulman and Ruth Shulman were authorized to conduct banking activities on behalf of the plaintiff. Employees of the bank recalled accepting checks from Lorraine Wallack, indorsed by her husband George, since the account was first opened. No employees ever recalled having served either of the Shulmans in connection with that account.

The plaintiff instituted the instant action alleging, *inter alia,*that defendant Marine Midland Bank, N. A., was liable to it for conversion of all those checks indorsed and cashed by the Wallacks naming the plaintiff as payee. Upon the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment against the bank, the Supreme Court ruled that the defendant bank was liable under Uniform Commercial Code § 3-419 (1) (c) for having paid on forged instruments. Because a question of fact has been presented concerning the issue of whether or not Wallack had been authorized to act on behalf of the plaintiff in transacting business with the bank, and specifically, to cash the checks in question, summary judgment is denied. Thompson, J. P., Kunzeman, Harwood and Miller, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

          I, James F. Walsh, certify that:

          1.       I have reviewed this report on Form10-K of Interpool, Inc.;

          2.       Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report;

          3.       Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

          4.       The registrant's other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

                    (a)     Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

                    (b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant'sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

                    (c)     Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financialreporting; and

          5.       The registrant's other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to theregistrant's auditors and the Audit Committee of the registrant's Board ofDirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

                    (a)     All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant'sability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; and

                    (b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  August 16, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5419 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5419

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to clarify the definition 
of employee as it relates to direct sellers and real estate agents, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 12, 2023

  Mr. Walberg (for himself, Mr. Cardenas, Mr. Moore of Utah, and Mr. 
   Cuellar) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to clarify the definition 
of employee as it relates to direct sellers and real estate agents, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Direct Seller and Real Estate Agent 
Harmonization Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    Section 3(e) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 
203(e)) is amended by inserting after paragraph (5) the following:
    ``(6) The term `employee' does not include any direct seller or 
qualified real estate agent (as such terms are defined in section 
3508(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986).''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5093 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5093

   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to preserve sole 
 community hospital determinations made by the Secretary of Health and 
                Human Services, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 28, 2023

 Mr. Waltz (for himself, Mr. Bacon, and Mr. Rutherford) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to preserve sole 
 community hospital determinations made by the Secretary of Health and 
                Human Services, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Patient Accessibility and Access To 
Community Healthcare Act'' or the ``PAATCH Act''.

SEC. 2. PRESERVATION OF SOLE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL DETERMINATIONS MADE BY 
              THE SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES.

    Section 1886(d)(5)(D)(iii) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395ww(d)(5)(D)(iii)) is amended--
            (1) in subclause (II), by striking at the end ``or'';
            (2) in subclause (III), by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting ``, or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new subclause:
                                    ``(IV) for the 5-year period 
                                beginning on the date of the enactment 
                                of this subclause, that met either of 
                                the requirements specified in 
                                subclauses (I) through (III) (as in 
                                effect on the date of the enactment of 
                                this subclause) on or before March 13, 
                                2020.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 23.2

            CONSENT OF REGISTERED AUDITORS AND CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

As registered auditors and chartered accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of our report dated February 23, 1998, on the
financial statements of The MBL Group Plc for the year ended December 31, 1997,
included in NFO Worldwide, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1999, into NFO Worldwide, Inc.'s previously filed Registration
Statements, File Nos. 33-73516, 33-83002, 33-91936, 333-24297, 333-24299,
333-38497, 333-51929, and 333-58067.

                                                            /s/ Soteriou Banerji
                                                            --------------------
London, England,
March 24, 2000.

                                       95
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

April 12, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6767

Apex Sourcing & Manufacturing: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_04.15.19.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 80 (Wednesday, April 24, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18154-18155]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10186]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting:

    Committee Name: National Institute of General Medical Sciences 
Special Emphasis Panel-MBRS.
    Date: April 30.
    Time: 8:00 a.m.-6 p.m.
    Place: Gaithersburg Holiday Inn, Washington Conference Room, 2 
Montgomery Village Avenue, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20879.
    Contact Person: Dr. Richard Martinez, Scientific Review 
Administrator, NIGMS, 45 Center Drive, Room 1AS-19g, Bethesda, MD 
20892-6200.
    Purpose: To review grant applications.
    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in secs.

[[Page 18155]]

552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. The discussions of these 
applications could reveal confidential trade secrets or commercial 
property such as patentable material and personal information 
concerning individuals associated with the applications, the 
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion 
of personal privacy.
    This notice is being published less than fifteen days prior to 
the first meeting due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations 
imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.821, 
Biophysics and Physiological Sciences; 93.859, Pharmacological 
Sciences; 93.862, Genetics Research; 93.863, Cellular and Molecular 
Basis of Disease Research; 93.880, Minority Access Research Careers 
[MARC]; and 93.375, Minority Biomedical Research Support [MBRS])

    Dated: April 19, 1996.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 96-10186 Filed 4-23-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
| SUBSIDIARIES OF FINLAY FINE      JEWELRY CORPORATION |   | JURISDICTION |
|------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------|
|                                                 |   |         |
| Finlay Jewelry,      Inc.                            |   | Delaware     |
| Finlay Merchandising & Buying,      Inc.         |   | Delaware     |
| Sonab Holdings,      Inc.                            |   | Delaware     |
| Sonab International,      Inc.                       |   | Delaware     |
| eFinlay,    Inc.                                     |   | Delaware     |
| Carlyle & Co. Jewelers      LLC                  |   | Delaware     |
| Park Promenade,      LLC                             |   | Florida      |
| L. Congress,      Inc.                               |   | Florida      |

----
Schedule II


                               CONRAIL, INC.
                     VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
                     FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
[CAPTION]
                               (In Millions)

<TABLE>
                                            Additions
                                      ----------------------
                           Balance at Charged to  Charged                Balance
                           Beginning   Costs and   to Other              At End
Description                of Period   Expenses   Accounts   Deductions   of Period
-----------               ----------- ----------- ---------  ----------  ----------
<S>                           <C>         <C>       <C>         <C>          <C>
                                                    (1)

1994
Casualty reserves
   Current...............    $ 93                             $(10) (2)      $103
   Noncurrent............     132        $172      $ 12        104  (3)       212

Allowance for disposition
  of property and
  equipment (4)...........    256                               15            241


1995
Casualty reserves
   Current...............     103                     3         (4) (2)       110
   Noncurrent............     212         171        14        180  (3)       217

Allowance for disposition
  of property and
  equipment (4) (5).......    241         261                   63            439


1996
Casualty reserves
   Current...............     110                              (31) (2)       141
   Noncurrent............     217         165        11        203  (3)       190

Allowance for disposition
  of property and
  equipment (4)............   439                               31            408



(1)  Includes charges to property accounts in connection with construction
     projects and the recording of receivables from third parties.

(2)  Includes net transfers from noncurrent.

(3)  Transfers to current.

(4)  Deductions of $15 million, $63 million and $31 million in 1994, 1995
     and 1996, respectively, represent net losses on asset dispositions.

(5)  In 1995, the Company recorded an asset disposition charge, which
     resulted from a review of the Company's route system and other operating
     assets to determine those that no longer effectively and economically
     support current and expected operations.  The Company identified and has
     committed to sell 1,800 miles of rail lines that are expected to provide
     proceeds substantially less than net book value.  In addition, other
     assets, principally yards and side tracks, identified for disposition have
     been written down to estimated net realizable value.


                                    S-1
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
Exhibit 23



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERD PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We hereby consent to incorporation by reference in the previously filed Registration Statement on Forms S-8 File Nos. 333-69420 and 333-69416 and Form S-3 File No.
33-71692 of Dimeco, Inc. of our report dated February 4, 2005, which report appears in the December 31, 2004, Annual Report on Form 10-K of Dimeco, Inc.



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/s/ S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.            
|                                    
|Wexford, Pennsylvania March 23, 2005