T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T SE AN COTT LE , P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. LA S V EG A S M ETRO PO LI CE D E P A R T M E N T ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 12- 16013 D . C . N o . 2 : 1 0 - c v - 0 0 2 7 1 - J C MP AL ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

N e va da J a m e s C . M a ha n, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d M a y14, 2013 ** B efo re: L E A V Y , T H O M A S , an d M U R G U IA , C i rcu i tJu d g es. S e a n C ott l e appe a l s pr o s e f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e nti n hi s 42 U . S . C . § 1 9 8 3 act i o n al l eg i n g co n st i tu t i o n al v i o l at i o n s i n co n n ect i o n w i th h i s arrest a nd de t e nt i on. W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 1291. W e r e vi e w de novo 

# FI LED MA Y23 2 013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS12- 16013 2 ad is m is s a l u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 9 1 5 A ( a ) , R es ni ck v. H ayes , 2 1 3 F .3 d 4 4 3 , 4 4 7 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 0 ) , s u m m a ry ju d g m e n t, T oguc hiv . Chung , 39 1 F . 3d 10 51 , 10 56 (9th C i r. 20 04 ), and a det erm i nat i on thata pri soner f ai l ed t o exh austadm i ni stra t i ve re m edi es u n d e rth e P r is o n L itig a tio n R e f o rm A c t, W

y at t v . T e rhune , 315 F . 3d 1108, 1117 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 3 ) . W e a f

f irm . T he di s tr i c tc ourtpr ope r l y di s m i s s e d C ott l e ’ s c l a i m ba s e d on de f e nda nt O ’ D ani el ’ s a l l eged l on g-st andi ng di sl i ke and b i as agai nsthi m because C ott l e f ai l ed t o i d e n t i f y ac o g n i z ab l e l e g a l th e o ryth a tw o u l d e n t i t l e h i m t o r e l i e f o n th i s c l a i m. See 2 8 U .S .C . § 1 9 1 5 A ( b ) ( 1 ) ; Sh roye r v. N ew C i ng ular W

i re les s Servs . , Inc. , 622 F . 3d 10 35 , 10 41 (9th C i r. 20 10 ) ( “ [D ] i sm i ss al for f ai l ure t o st at e acl ai m i s ‘ prop er o n lyw h e r e th e r e is n o c o g n iz ab le le g a l th e o ryo ra n ab s e n c e o f s u f f ic ie n t f a c ts al l eged t o sup po rta c og ni zabl e l egal theory. ’ ” ( ci t at i on om i tt ed)) . Th e d i s tr i c tc o u rtp r o p e r l y g r a n t e d s u mma ryj u d g me n to n Co tt l e ’ s c l a i ms base d o n d ef

endantO ’ D ani el ’ s a l l egedl y per j ured t es t i m on y a thi s c ri m i nal tri al b e c au s e O ’D a n ie l is im m u n e f r o m liab ility . Se e B r is c oe v . L aH ue , 460 U . S . 325, 32 6 (19 83 ) ( ho l di ng thatl aw enforce m entoffi ce rs ar e i m m un e f rom l i abi l i ty e ven for per j ured t es t i m on y) . T h e d i stri ctco u rtp ro p erl y co n cl u d ed th atC o tt l e fai l ed t o ex h au st adm i ni stra t i ve re m edi es w i th res pectt o h i s c l ai m s r egar di ng the al l eged12- 16013 3 const i tut i on al vi ol at i on s thatoccurre d w hi l e C ott l e w as det ai ned i n the C l ark C o u n tyD e te n tio n C e n te r . Se e W oodf ord v . N go , 548 U . S . 81, 85, 93- 95 ( 2006) ( h o ld in g th a t “p r o p e re x h au s tio n ” is m a n d a to rya n d r e q u ir e s a d h e r e n c e to a d m in is tr a tiv e p r o c e d u r a l ru le s ) ; Sa p p v . Kim b r e ll , 62 3 F . 3d 81 3, 82 3-24 (9th C i r. 20 10 ) ( fut i l i ty e xcept i on t o the adm i ni stra t i ve exhaust i on re qu i re m entre qu i re s that the i nm at e e st abl i sh “ thathe ac tual l y f i l ed a gri evance or gri evances ”) . T he di s tr i c tc ourtdi d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on i n de ny i ng C ott l e ’ s r e que s tf or appo i ntm entof coun se l because C ott l e f ai l ed t o d em on stra t e e xcept i on al c ir c u m s ta n c e s . See P alm erv. V aldez , 560 F . 3d 965, 970 ( 9th C i r . 2009) ( s e tt i ng forth st andard of revi ew and the except i on al ci rc um st ance s r equi re m ent ). T o th e e x te n t C o ttle c o n te n d s th a t th e d is tr ic t c o u rt e rr e d b yf a ilin g to a d d r e s s C o ttle ’s c la im s a g a in s t th e J o h n D o e d e f e n d a n ts , th is a r g u m e n t is u n av ai l i n g b ecau se C o tt l e n ev er am en d ed h i s co m p l ai n tt o n am e th ese d efen d an t s, no r di d h e s erve them w i th p roce ss . C ott l e’ s c on t ent i on thatthe L as V egas M e tr o p o lita n P o lic e d e p a rtm e n t a c c e p te d s e rv ic e o n b e h a lf o f a ll d e f e n d a n ts is u n s u p p o rte d b y th e r e c o r d . W e do notc ons i de rm a tt e r s ne i the rde ve l ope d i n the di s tr i c tc ourtnor s p e c if ic a llya n d d is tin c tlyr a is e d a n d a r g u e d in th e o p e n in g b r ie f . Se e P a d

g e tt v .12- 16013 4 W r i ght , 5 8 7 F .3 d 9 8 3 , 9 8 5 n .2 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ) ( p e rc u r ia m ) . AF F I RME D.