alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Accentia Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
Company) for the nine months ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Francis E. ODonnell, Jr., Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended: and

(2)
The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 14, 2007



|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Francis E. ODonnell, Jr.                           
|Francis E. ODonnell, Jr., M.D.                         
|Chief Executive Officer; Chairman of the Board; Director

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Accentia Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the
date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
EXHIBIT 31.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I, James Fallacaro, President and Chief Executive Officer of Global Music International, Inc. (the "Registrant"), certify that:





1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 of the Registrant;





2. Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:


(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;





(c) disclosed in this report any changes in the Registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):





(a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal controls over financial reporting





Dated: September 15, 2011
By:
/s/ James FallacaroJames FallacaroPresident and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 68 (Monday, April 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18144-18145]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8722]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-30,505]


Cushman Industries, Inc.; Hartford, CT; Notice of Revised 
Determination on Reconsideration

    On March 7, 1995, the Department issued an Affirmative 
Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration for workers and 
former workers of the subject firm. The notice was published in the 
Federal Register on March 17, 1995 (60 FR 14452).
    The findings show that the Hartford, Connecticut plant closed in 
December, 1994 when all production workers were laid off and production 
ceased.
    New findings on reconsideration show that the company had increased 
imports of chucks in the relevant period.

Conclusion

    After careful consideration of the new facts obtained on 
reconsideration, it is concluded that the workers at Cushman 
Industries, Hartford, Connecticut were adversely affected by increased 
imports of articles like or directly competitive with the chucks 
produced at Cushman Industries in Hartford, Connecticut. In accordance 
with the provisions of the Act, I make the following revised 
determination for workers of Cushman Industries, Hartford, Connecticut.
    ``All workers of Cushman Industries in Hartford, Connecticut who 
became totally or partially separated from employment on or after 
November 2, 1993 are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under 
Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.''

    [[Page 18145]] Signed at Washington, D.C., this 30th day of 
March 1995.
Victor J. Trunzo,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 95-8722 Filed 4-7-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6211

Yanfeng US Automotive Interior Systems I LLC:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Order entered November 17, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-01369-CV

MICHAEL D. WILSON, Appellant

V.

WOODLAND HILLS APARTMENT, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-15-04980-C

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s November 16, 2015 motion for leave to proceed as 

indigent, filed concurrently with an affidavit of indigence. Because the rules of appellate 

procedure afford the trial court clerk, court reporter, and parties to the appeal an opportunity to 

contest the affidavit, and only one day has passed since the affidavit was filed, we DENY 

appellant’s motion without prejudice to refiling should his affidavit be contested and the contest 

sustained by the trial court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(e), (j).

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
Organization Name:

Note: Representatives submitting on behalf of an organization must enter information below.

Requestor Representative:

Section 301 Investigation: China's Acts, Policies, and Practices Related to Technology 

Transfer, Intellectual Property, and Innovation - Form to Request Exclusion of Product

When submitting a product exclusion request using this form, enter the specified 

information in the following fields and explain the basis and rationale for your statements. 

By completing this form, you certify that the information provided is complete and 

correct to the best of your knowledge. 

1. Indicate whether the comment contains business confidential information (BCI), is a public

document, or is a public version of a BCI document.

3.

2. Please provide a complete and detailed description of the product of concern:

4.

5. Requestor's relationship to the product:

CONTINUED BELOW

*

10-digit HTSUS item number* for product you wish to address in this product exclusion request:

Use numerical characters only with no special characters (example: 1023456789). For help in finding 

the HTSUS item number associated with your product, see https://hts.usitc.gov/

1

7.

6. Does this submission in regulations.gov include additional attachments?

Please indicate whether any additional attachment contains business confidential

information (BCI), is a public document, or is a public version of a BCI document.

VERSION 1

Requestor Information

Requestor Name (Last, First):

Public Version of BCI

WAP15008D, Air Driven Hydraulic Pump, 465 in3/min Oil Flow at 100 psi, 415 in3 Usable Oil; 

Maximum Operating Pressure psi: 2760; Weight Lbs: 71; 0: 30 - 120; Hydraulic Pump Hydraulic to Air 

Ratio: 23:01

8413500080 Schmidt, Jackie Enerpac Jackie SchmidtImporter Yes Contains BCI
END 2

8. Is this product, or a comparable product, available from sources in the United States?:

VERSION 1

11. Please provide information in support your request, taking account of the instructions

provided in Section B of the Federal Register notice (note: text entered below can extend

beyond the apparent size of this box).

9. Is this product, or a comparable product, available from sources in third countries?:

10. Please provide the value and quantity (with units) of the Chinese-origin product of concern

that you purchased for each calendar year specified. Limit this figure to the products

purchased by your firm (or by members of your trade association) alone. Please provide 

estimates if precise figures are unavailable.

2016 Value:

2015 Value:

2017 Value:

2016 Quantity:

2015 Quantity:

2017 Quantity:

No No BCI BCI BCI BCI BCI BCI

See addendum for additional information.
June 2, 2016

	In accordance with the enclosed Memorandum Opinion, below is the judgment in the numbered cause set out herein to be entered in the Minutes of this Court as of the 2nd day of June, 2016.

10-16-00155-CR	EX PARTE BOBBY WALLER - ON APPEAL FROM THE 52ND DISTRICT COURT OF CORYELL COUNTY - TRIAL COURT NO.  9987 - DISMISSED - Memorandum Opinion by Justice Scoggins:

“This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record, and the same being considered, because it is the opinion that this Court lacks jurisdiction and that the appeal should be dismissed; it is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the appeal be, and hereby is, dismissed for want of jurisdiction.  It is further ordered that costs of appeal be, and hereby are, adjudged against Appellant and that this decision be certified below for observance.”

# image1.png
#### Linda S. GIVINS, Petitioner/Appellant, v. CITY OF PINE LAWN, et al., Defendants/Respondents.

No. 65212.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

June 21, 1994.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 28, 1994.

Application to Transfer Denied Sept. 20, 1994.

Howard Paperner, Clayton, for appellant.

Rodolfo Rivera, Clayton, for respondents.

Before CRANE, P.J., and KAROHL and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

*.*PER CURIAM.

Linda S. Givins appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County affirming her removal as the Mayor of the City of Pine Lawn by the Pine Lawn Board of Alderman pursuant to § 79.240 RSMo. 1986. We find that there was competent and substantial evidence on the record as a whole to support the board’s decision and that an opinion would have no precedential value. Therefore, the judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 31.2
I, Michael B. Wheeler, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of TufcoTechnologies, Inc., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Tufco Technologies,Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisReport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation includedin this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,and for, the periods presented in this Report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this Report is beingprepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this Report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this Report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.
Date: December 29, 2004
/s/ Michael B. WheelerMichael B. Wheeler
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6153

Yanfeng US Automotive Interior Systems I LLC:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5197 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5197

  To amend title 38, United States Code, to require the Secretary of 
    Veterans Affairs to furnish memorial headstones and markers for 
 eligible spouses and dependent children of veterans whose remains are 
                  unavailable, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 11, 2023

  Mr. Posey introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, to require the Secretary of 
    Veterans Affairs to furnish memorial headstones and markers for 
 eligible spouses and dependent children of veterans whose remains are 
                  unavailable, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY FOR DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS MEMORIAL 
              HEADSTONES AND MARKERS OF VETERANS' SPOUSES AND DEPENDENT 
              CHILDREN WHOSE REMAINS ARE UNAVAILABLE.

    Section 2306(b)(2) of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``An individual who 
        dies on or after November 11, 1998, who is the'' and inserting 
        ``The'';
            (2) in subparagraph (C), by striking ``An individual who 
        dies on or after November 11, 1998, who is an'' and inserting 
        ``An''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(6) In the case of an eligible individual described in 
        paragraph (2)(B) or (C), the Secretary may furnish a marker 
        under paragraph (1) by--
                    ``(A) affixing the individual's name, dates of 
                birth and death, and relationship to the veteran to an 
                existing marker for the veteran; or
                    ``(B) if necessary, by furnishing a suitable 
                replacement marker for the veteran that includes such 
                individual's name, dates of birth and death, and 
                relationship to the veteran.
            ``(7) For the purpose of expediting the provision of a 
        marker under paragraph (1) for an eligible individual described 
        in paragraph (2)(B) or (C), the Secretary may accept, but may 
        not require, funds contributed by a survivor of the veteran or 
        eligible person.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Fred HENDERSON, Defendant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent.

No. 62684.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Sept. 7, 1993.

S. Paige Canfield, St. Louis, for defendant-appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff-respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Fred Henderson, appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion following an evidentiary hearing. Defendant was convicted of murder in the first degree. He was sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole.

The judgement of the trial court denying defendant’s Rule 29.15 motion is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. The judgement is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Lester STONE, Appellant. Lester STONE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. 59348, 61703.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

May 18, 1993.

*431Raymond L. Legg, Mareie W. Bower, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Rudolph E. Rhodes, IV, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before AHRENS, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

A consolidated appeal. Defendant was convicted as a prior and persistent offender of first degree robbery and armed criminal action. He appeals his convictions and the denial of his 29.15 motion after a hearing based on ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm per Rules 84.16(b) and 30.25(b). No error of law appears, and the motion court’s findings are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Immureboost, Inc. (formerly eSavingsStore.com, Inc.) (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven Burke, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Date:November 19, 2007





---------------------------------

Name:

/s/ Steve Burke

Title:

CFO/CEO