alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

JULIA DIPIAZZA, *

* No. 20-328V

Petitioner, * Special Master Christian J. Moran

*

v. * Filed: December 20, 2021

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Stipulation; influenza (“flu”) vaccine; 

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * SIRVA; shoulder injury.

*

Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Michael G. McLaren, Black McLaren, et al., PC, Memphis, TN, for Petitioner;

Althea W. Davis, United States Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. 

UNPUBLISHED DECISION1

On December 14, 2021, the parties filed a joint stipulation concerning the 

petition for compensation filed by Julia Dipiazza on March 24, 2020. Petitioner 

alleged that the influenza (“flu”) vaccine she received on November 16, 2018, 

which is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R. §100.3(a), 

caused her to suffer from a left shoulder injury related to vaccination 

administration (“SIRVA”). Petitioner further alleges that she suffered the residual 

effects of this injury for more than six months. Petitioner represents that there has 

been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages on her behalf as a 

result of her condition.

Respondent denies that the flu vaccine caused petitioner to suffer from 

SIRVA or any other injury. 

1 The E-Government Act, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and 

Promotion of Electronic Government Services), requires that the Court post this decision on its 

website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), the parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing 

redaction of medical information or other information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4). 

Any redactions ordered by the special master will appear in the document posted on the website.
2

Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto. The 

undersigned finds said stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the 

Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Damages awarded in that stipulation include:

A lump sum payment of $18,500.00 in the form of a check payable to 

petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that 

would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC, Appendix B, 

the clerk is directed to enter judgment according to this decision and the attached 

stipulation.2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Christian J. Moran

Christian J. Moran

Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties can expedite entry of judgment by each 

party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal 

Claims judge.
EXHIBIT 32.1

            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                         RULE 13a-14(b) OR 15d-14(b) AND
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jurak Corporation World
Wide, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for quarter ended November 30, 2004,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the date hereof, I,
Anthony C. Jurak, Chairman of the Board and Director and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule
15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act') and
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, that:

         (1)      the Company's Quarterly Report fully complies with the
                  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                  Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly
                  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
                  and results of operations of the Company.

Date: January 18, 2004                      /s/ Anthony C. Jurak
                                            -------------------------------
                                            Anthony C. Jurak
                                            Chairman of the Board and Director
                                            Chief Executive Officer and
                                            Chief Financial Officer



























                                       12
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The
Board of Directors
Cymer, Inc.:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-16559, No. 333-99975, No. 333-88616,
No. 333-67491, No. 333-48242, No. 333-69736, No. 333-58554, No. 333-109544,
No. 333-118496, No. 333-127748, No. 333-142621, and 333-145089) on Form S-8 and in the registration statement
No. 333-88496 on Form S-3 of Cymer, Inc. of our report dated February 26, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of
Cymer, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows, for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, and the related financial statement schedule II, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2007, which reports appear in the December 31, 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cymer, Inc.

Our
report refers to the Company's adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R),Share-Based Payment,effective January 1, 2006 and Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxesan Interpretation
of FASB Statement No. 109, effective January 1, 2007.

|                                        |  |            
|--------------------------------------- |  | -----------
|                                        |  | /s/KPMG LLP
|San Diego, California
February 26, 2008 |  |            

---



QuickLinks
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-5784

Alo Tennessee Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Robert K. Eulau, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Sanmina-SCI Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

1.                                       The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 2, 2010, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the “Periodic Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

 

2.                                       The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of May 24, 2011.

 
|   | /s/   Robert K. Eulau           |
|--------|---------------------------------|
|   | Robert   K. Eulau               |
|   | Chief   Financial Officer       |
|   | (Principal   Financial Officer) |

 

This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Sanmina-SCI Corporation under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

 

----
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6890

BorgWarner Emissions Systems: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions.

pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>
                        RESTATED

<ARTICLE>                                           7
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000897430
<NAME>                        TIG Holdings, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.00
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           0
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          4,297
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            4,297
<EQUITIES>                                     0
<MORTGAGE>                                     0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 4,411
<CASH>                                         1
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             1,232
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         147
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 6,659
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                3,888
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            726
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          25
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                119
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          25
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,189
<OTHER-SE>                                     160
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   6,659
<PREMIUMS>                                     386
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            69
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 0
<BENEFITS>                                     306
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           231
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (82)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (51)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (31)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (31)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.53)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        0
        


</TABLE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6822

Otis Elevator Co:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_5-30-2019.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 61 (Thursday, March 30, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 16452]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7771]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Native American Business Consultant Applications: Nationwide

AGENCY: Minority Business Development Agency, Commerce.

ACTION: Cancellation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Minority Business Development Agency is cancelling the 
announcement to solicit competitive applications to operate its Native 
American Business Consultant (NABC) Program. This solicitation was 
originally published in the Federal Register, Thursday, January 12, 
1995, Vol. 60, No. 8, 2947.

11.801  Native American Program

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance)

    Dated: March 24, 1995.
Donald L. Powers,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, Minority Business Development Agency.
[FR Doc. 95-7771 Filed 3-29-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-21-P
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Celtic Cross Ltd.. (the    "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with    the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,    Howard Bouch, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,    pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the    Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all    material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the    Company.

Date: March 15, 2006

 

***/s/ Howard Bouch           ***

Name: Howard Bouch

Title: President and

Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has    been provided to Celtic Cross Ltd.., and will be retained by Celtic Cross    Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff    upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 71 (Thursday, April 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 18807]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9068]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. GT95-32-000]


Carnegie Natural Gas Co.; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas 
Tariff

April 7, 1995.
    Take notice that on March 24, 1995, Carnegie Natural Gas Company 
(Carnegie), pursuant to Sections 31.3(b)(5) of the General Terms and 
Conditions of its FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, tendered 
for filing a refund report on its flowthrough of refunds received from 
Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation (TETCO) as part of TETCO's 
Global Settlement in Docket No. RP85-177-119, et al. Article III of the 
Global Settlement required TETCO to refund to its customers, including 
Carnegie, certain amounts collected as Contract Assignment Program 
(CAP) costs, Account N0. 191 transition costs, and Gas Supply 
Realignment (GSR) costs.
    Carnegie states it received the TETCO refunds on December 30, 1994, 
and, on February 28, 1995, pursuant to Sections 31.3(b)(4) and 32.1 of 
its tariff, flowed through the jurisdictional portion thereof, 
$669,417.42, to its former bundled sales customers under Rate Schedules 
CDS and LVWS. This amount includes applicable interest, an offset for 
unpaid installments on PGA passthrough amounts which its customers owed 
Carnegie, as well as a billing adjustment related to the Global 
Settlement's cap on TETCO's recoverable Account No. 191 transition 
costs.
    Any person desiring to be heard or protest this application should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests should 
be filed on or before April 14, 1995. Protests will be considered by 
the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but 
will not serve to make the protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. 
Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available 
for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-9068 Filed 4-12-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
ff 

( 

0000000n 129n 1g 

3453 

111 

- hair' Hold Up (Upper Proie) 

.(I I A:(711 '-Gradlent Pan Body 

GB/71804-2000 1. 

l'41/kt. 

RIOR 

Imo I ±0.12 

0.5-3 

f65c19 

>3-0 >6-30 

±0.20 

>30-120 

±0.30 

>120-400 

±0.50 

>400-1002 

± 0.110 

>1000-2000 

± 1.20 

>2000-4000 

±2.00 

44t 

# 

6114-1z, if T053,12 

R098.4 1 . 30 

I t t 4 B120531200000000
#### Robert Gene BURROUGHS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 56194.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

Aug. 1, 1989.

Michael Hardcastle, St. Louis, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Daryl R. Hylton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

HAMILTON, Judge.

Movant Robert Gene Burroughs (hereinafter, Burroughs) appeals the judgment of the motion court that denied, without an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm.

On February 14, 1984, following conviction by a jury, Burroughs was sentenced to consecutive prison terms of ten years for burglary in the second degree and five years for possession of burglar tools. This court affirmed the convictions. *State v. Burroughs,*682 S.W.2d 88 (Mo.App.1984).

On March 15, 1985, Burroughs filed a motion pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 27.26. The motion court dismissed that motion without an evidentiary hearing.

On June 29, 1988, Burroughs filed the instant motion pursuant to Rule 29.15. The motion court overruled it without an evidentiary hearing. Burroughs appeals, asserting that the motion court erred in denying him relief without an evidentiary hearing. Rule 29.15(m) provides:

> This Rule 29.15 shall apply to all proceedings wherein sentence is pronounced on or after January 1, 1988. If sentence is pronounced *prior to January 1, 1988, and no prior motion has been filed pursuant to Rule 27.26, a motion under this Rule 29.15 may be filed on or before June 30, 1988.*Failure to file a motion on or before June 30, 1988, shall constitute a complete waiver of the right to proceed under this Rule 29.15. If a sentence is pronounced prior to January 1, 1988, and a prior motion under Rule 27.26 is pending, post-conviction relief shall continue to be governed by the provisions of Rule 27.26 in effect on the date the motion was filed. (Emphasis added.)

Pursuant to the preceding language, Burroughs is ineligible to file a Rule 29.15 motion. Although his sentence was pronounced before January 1, 1988, he filed a Rule 27.26 motion prior to filing the instant Rule 29.15 motion. Thus, the terms of *560Rule 29.15 preclude Burroughs from obtaining post-conviction relief under that Rule. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the motion court.

CARL R. GAERTNER and STEPHAN, JJ., concur.