U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 close



Research
                Research Home
                            National Programs
                            Research Projects
                            Scientific Manuscripts
                            International Engagement
                            Scientific Software/Models
                            Databases and Datasets
                            Office of Scientific Quality Review
            Media
                News & Features
                            Multimedia
                            Briefing Room
                            Down on the Farm
                            Press Room
                            Science in Your Shopping Cart
                            Scientific Discoveries
                            Tellus
                            Under the Microscope
            About ARS
                About ARS Home
                            Staff Directory
                            Labs and Research Centers (Map)
                            Headquarter Offices
                            Organizational Chart
                            Employee Services (REE Employees Only)
                            Office of Outreach, Diversity, and Equal Opportunity
            Work With Us
                Work With Us Home
                            ARS Vacancies at USAJOBS
                            Careers at ARS Information
                            Scientific Collaborations
                            Extramural Agreements
                            1890 Faculty Research Sabbatical ProgramSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Beltsville, Maryland (BHNRC) Beltsville Human Nutrition Research Center Food Components and Health Laboratory Research Publications at this Location





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Title:   Author  item
                                            ROSNER PREIS, SARAH - Harvard School Of Public Healthitem
                                            SPIEGELMAN, DONNA - Harvard School Of Public Healthitem
                                            ZHAO, BARBARA - Harvard School Of Public Healthitem
                                            Moshfegh, Alannaitem
                                            Baer, Daviditem
                                            WILLETT, WALTER - Harvard School Of Public Health
  Submitted to: American Journal of Epidemiology
                                    Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal
                                    Publication Acceptance Date: 10/24/2010
                                    Publication  Date: 2/22/2011
                                    Citation: Rosner Preis, S., Spiegelman, D., Zhao, B., Moshfegh, A.J., Baer, D.J., Willett, W.C. 2011. Random and correlated errors in gold standards used in nutritional epidemiology: implications for validation studies. American Journal of Epidemiology. 173:683-94.Interpretive Summary: Measuring food intake food in free-living populations is important in epidemiologic studies designed to assess the association between diet and health.  These types of studies provide insight into the role of diet in preventing diseases that may take many years to develop, such as cancer.  Food frequency questionnaires (FFQ) are a tool that has been used to determine food intake.  However, these questionnaires are prone to errors, including measurement errors.  To develop better ways to correct for measurement error, data were used from two validation studies that used recovery biomarkers, the Observing Protein and Energy Nutrition (OPEN) and the Automated Multiple-Pass Method Validation (AMPM) Study.  In the OPEN study, it was not possible to adequately account for within-person variation in protein and energy intake estimated by recovery biomarkers since these measures were collected too closely together.  The result of this timing is that there could be an overestimation of the error correlation between the food frequency questionnaire and 24-hour recall, and an under-estimation of the FFQ’s validity.  In the AMPM Study, repeated doubly labeled water and urinary nitrogen samples were collected one year apart.  This timing allowed for estimation of the relationship (correlation) between energy intake, as well as the protein density of the diet.  Correlations between true protein density intake and the FFQ were higher in the AMPM study compared to the OPEN study (0.42 vs 0.36, respectively).  When assuming no biomarker scale bias, the de-attenuation factor was 0.33 in OPEN and 0.52 in AMPM, similar to the regression slope estimates for dietary recall of the two studies.  Analyses that adjust for measurement error using standard methods would often be substantially less biased than analyses which ignore measurement error, even when recovery biomarkers do not exist or are otherwise infeasible to include in validation studies.
                                Technical Abstract: The measurement error correction de-attenuation factor was estimated from two studies using recovery biomarkers.  One study, the Observing Protein and Energy Nutrition (OPEN), was unable to adequately account for within-person variation in protein and energy intake estimated by recovery biomarkers, which could have resulted in overestimation of the error correlation between the food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and 24-hour recall (24HR), and an under-estimation of the FFQ’s validity.  In the other study, the Automated Multiple-Pass Method Validation (AMPM) Study, repeated doubly labeled water (DLW)and urinary nitrogen (UN) were collected one year apart, yielding intra-class correlation coefficients of 0.43 for energy (DLW) and 0.54 for protein density (UN/DLW), indicating important within-person variation in these biomarkers.  Correlation between true protein density intake and the FFQ was 0.36 in OPEN and 0.42 in AMPM, and the de-attenuation factor was 0.15 in OPEN and 0.30 in AMPM when assuming no 24HR scale bias. When assuming no biomarker scale bias, the de-attenuation factor was 0.33 in OPEN and 0.52 in AMPM, similar to regression slope estimates for dietary records data on the FFQ of 0.49 in OPEN and 0.32 in AMPM. Standard measurement error methods may adequately adjust for bias due to measurement error in energy-adjusted nutrients.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov