alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 72 (Friday, April 14, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 19016]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9235]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service


Cleanup and Rehabilitation of the White King and Lucky Lass 
Uranium Mines, Fremont National Forest, Lake County, OR

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Cancellation of an environmental impact statement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On August 10, 1989, a Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare an 
environmental impact statement (EIS) for the Cleanup and Rehabilitation 
of the White King and Lucky Lass Uranium Mines on the Lakeview Ranger 
District of the Fremont National Forest was published in the Federal 
Register (54 FR 32837). A revised NOI was published in the Federal 
Register on February 12, 1991 (56 FR 5676). The draft EIS was released 
in August 1991, with a Notice of Availability date of August 23, 1991 
(56 FR 41842). The Forest Service has decided not to prepare the final 
EIS on this proposal because an RI/FS will be prepared; therefore, this 
Notice of Intent is rescinded.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:Direct questions regarding this 
cancellation to Janine Cannon, Environmental Coordinator, Lakeview 
Ranger District, Lakeview, Oregon 97630; phone (503) 947-6333.

    Dated: March 31, 1995.
Charles R. Graham,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 95-9235 Filed 4-13-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

JOVON DATON JONES, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 468 MAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 31st day of December, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED. 

Mr. Justice Eakin did not participate in the decision of this matter.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-7496

General Motors:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
PUBLIC VERSION
$[*********] [******]

$[*********]

INPUT

20.0

$[*********]

[******]

[******]

0.05

PUBLIC VERSION
Consistent with USTR's Section 301 notice, OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. requests

confidential treatment for the information designated as business confidential in this submission. Such

information consists of information that would not customarily be released to the public, including

business or trade secrets regarding production costs and processes, data on sales, product characteristics

customers, destinations, and other product, sales, and cost-related business secrets. Business confidential

information has been indicated herein by enclosing it in single brackets (“[ ]”). A public version of these

comments is also being filed with all confidential information removed.

OMRON in the US is the only designer of this product and only supplier of this component. OMRON in

the US is the only designer of this product and only supplier of this component. POWER WINDOW

SWITCH is a molded plastic switch containing electrical switches

. It is only used for further

assembly of components which go into domestic automobile production. which is specified by auto

manufacturer.

This product is not a target of the US Administration's 301 investigation regarding Intellectual Property

concerns. This is not a concern to IP transfer and impressment. This product contains no IP of interest

related to autonomous vehicle production.

The tariff action ultimately poses a risk of significant damage to OMRON, the domestic

automobile industry, and ultimately the US consumer as a increase in price. Like in the case of similar

approvals for vehicle components at the HTS level, OMRON views this product in the same manner.

Immediate movement of production to a US manufacturer or another country would pose significant

re-tooling costs, significant amounts of time , and approvals pertaining to consumer automobile safety

standards are costly and would take a significant amount of time to obtain.

OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. believes that CBP can easily exclude the POWER

WINDOW SWITCH in question based solely on the product description. The following are draft CBP

exclusion instructions:

"POWER WINDOW SWITCH flat rectangular assembly with six switches: two "u" shaped on the

bottom row, two "u" shaped in the middle row, and two toggle switches oriented with the length of the

assembly "Plastic case with knob assemblies used for POWER WINDOW SWITCH (4 DR

Master).Consist: - 4 window(2 Auto/2 Manual) knobs and 1 door lockout knob with 5 spring and 5

plungers to drive the knob movement;- 1 window lockout knob assembly consist of 2 plastic plate and 1

plastic window lockout knob- 1 lockout assembly consists of 1 case, 2 springs, 1 pin and 1 plastic

plunger.- 2 plastic light guides for light transmission- 2 screws. Case: 105 mm x64 mm x38.5 mm .Knob

27.34 mm x20.08mm x28.26mm Knob 27.34mm x20.08mm x28.26mm Knob 27.53mm x20.08mm

x28.26mm Knob 28.8 mm x16 mm x35.5mm Knob 25.7 mm x 20 mm x 20.16 mm"

This information will be contained on the invoice from the supplier

PUBLIC VERSION
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT FRANK ROSSOTTO, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-2738 ) WEST PARK VILLAGE CONDOMINIUM ) ASSOCIATION, INC., ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed March 28, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Perry A. Little, Senior Judge. Frank Rossotto, pro se. Stephan C. Nikoloff of Cianfrone, Nikoloff, Grant & Greenberg, P.A., Dunedin, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Wahl v. Taylor, 926 So. 2d 488, 489 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) ("[A]n order merely granting a motion for summary- 2 -

judgment is not a final order because it does not enter judgment for or against a party."); Better Gov't Ass'n of Sarasota Cty. v. State, 802 So. 2d 414 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).

LaROSE, C.J., and CRENSHAW and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 23.1                       


              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



The Board of Directors
St. Francis Capital Corporation:

         We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement
(No. 33-70012 and 333-24057) on Form S-8 of St. Francis Capital Corporation of
our report dated November 13, 1997, relating to the consolidated statements of
financial condition of St. Francis Capital Corporation and Subsidiary as of
September 30, 1997 and 1996, and the related consolidated statements of income,
shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended September 30, 1997, which report appears in the September 30, 1997
annual report on Form 10-K of St. Francis Capital Corporation.



                                                   KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP



Milwaukee, Wisconsin
December 26, 1997





                                     102
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 81 (Thursday, April 25, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 18405]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10156]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[OR-050-1110-00:G6-0123]


Shooting Restriction on Public Lands; Oregon

April 15, 1996.
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice is hereby given that the area as legally described below 
is seasonally closed to shooting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

LEGAL DESCRIPTION: This closure order applies to all areas within 
Township 16 South, Range 12 East, Section 9, NE of the SW; Section 9, 
SE of the SW; and Section 9, NW of the SE.
    Effective immediately, all areas as described above are closed to 
shooting between January 1 and August 31, annually. ``Shooting'', in 
this closure, is defined as the discharge of firearms. A firearm is 
defined as a weapon, by whatever name known, which is designed to expel 
a projectile by the action of powder and which is readily capable of 
use as a weapon. The purpose of this closure is to protect wildlife 
resources. More specifically, this closure is ordered to protect a 
nesting pair of golden eagles and other raptors present in the area. 
Currently, the occurrence of shooting at this site jeopardizes the 
persistence and nesting success of the golden eagles at this location. 
Exemptions to this closure order may be made on a case-by-case basis by 
the authorized officer. This emergency order will be evaluated in the 
Urban Interface Amendment to the Brothers/La Pine Resource Management 
Plan of 1989. The authority for this closure is 43 CFR 8364.1: Closure 
and restriction orders.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sarah Nichols, Wildlife Biologist, BLM Prineville District Office, P.O. 
Box 550, Prineville, Oregon 97754, telephone (541) 416-6725.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Violation of this closure order is 
punishable by a fine not to exceed $1,000 and/or imprisonment not to 
exceed 12 months as provided in 43 CFR 8360.0-7.

    Dated: April 15, 1996.
James G. Kenna,
Deschutes Resource Area Manager, Prineville District Office.
[FR Doc. 96-10156 Filed 4-24-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,528,650
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       3,636,326
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               945,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       2,923,222
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         2,967,741
<LOANS>                                    124,960,697
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,681,735
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             176,473,684
<DEPOSITS>                                 154,892,529
<SHORT-TERM>                                 3,612,876
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,815,688
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       365,259
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,787,332
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             176,473,684
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             10,371,556
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,733,118
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               510,831
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            12,615,505
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           5,522,955
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,610,508
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        7,004,997
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  451,400
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               8,900
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              4,356,182
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,127,863
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   3,127,863
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,116,628
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.90
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.90
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.13
<LOANS-NON>                                    584,292
<LOANS-PAST>                                   940,740
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               822,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,511,123
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  313,263
<RECOVERIES>                                    32,475
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,681,735
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,681,735
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          9,000
        

</TABLE>
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed

December 23 , 2014.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 14

- 00783

- CV

IN RE KEVAN CASEY, J INSUN LLC, AND FAR E AST STRATEGIES LLC , Relator s

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 113th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2012

- 54501



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

On October 1, 2014, relator s , Kevan Casey, Jinsun LLC, and Far East Strategies LLC
, filed a petition for writ of m andamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator s ask this Court to compel the Honorable Michael Landrum, presiding judge of the 113th
District Court of Harris County
, to set aside his September 15, 2014 order denying2

their m otion to dismiss what they state is a shareholder derivative lawsuit filed by real party in interest, Khaled Alattar, for lack of standing

. Relators have not established their entitlement to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus. We also lift our stay issued on October 3, 2014.

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Justices McCally, Brown, and Wise.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5417 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5417

To require the denial of admission to the United States for individuals 
 subject to sanctions pursuant to Executive Order 13876, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 12, 2023

Ms. Tenney (for herself and Ms. Salazar) introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the denial of admission to the United States for individuals 
 subject to sanctions pursuant to Executive Order 13876, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Strengthening Entry Visa Enforcement 
and Restrictions Act'' or the ``SEVER Act''.

SEC. 2. DENIAL OF VISAS TO CERTAIN REPRESENTATIVES TO UNITED NATIONS.

    Section 407(a)(1) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, 
Fiscal Years 1990 and 1991 (Public Law 101-246; 8 U.S.C. 1102 note) is 
amended by striking ``; and'' and inserting ``, or is subject to 
sanctions pursuant to Executive Order 13876 (50 U.S.C. 1701 note; 
relating to imposing sanctions with respect to Iran), as in effect on 
September 15, 2022; and''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Petitioner

v.

NATHANIEL A. SPADY,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 731 MAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 17th day of May, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Description of the 2010 Executive Officer Bonus Plan



 Exhibit 10.9 

Description of the 2010 Executive Officer Bonus Plan 

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Compensation Committee”) of Manitex International, Inc. (the “Company”)
approved the Company’s 2010 Executive Officer Bonus Plan (“Bonus Plan”) on March 24, 2010. All executive officers of the Company, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, and a number of other
management employees are eligible participants in the Bonus Plan. Under the Bonus Plan, executives and managers are to be paid quarterly discretionary bonuses. Any bonus payments are contingent on the Company having cumulative operating income for
the year through the quarter ending immediately prior to payment and must be approved by the Compensation Committee. The Company intends to pay the quarterly bonuses in a combination of stock and cash. The stock awards will be granted pursuant to
the Company’s Second Amended and Restated 2004 Equity Incentive Plan. Although bonuses pursuant to the Bonus Plan are dependent on having cumulative operating income, the Compensation Committee may adjust bonuses based on any measures either
financial or non-financial that the Committee believes will benefit long-term stockholder value. 
  

 42
#### In the Matter of William J. Grinker, as Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York, Respondent. Seena Rose, as Proposed Conservatee, Appellant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Irving Kirschenbaum, J.), entered on or about November 23, 1988, which appointed a conservator for the property of respondent, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of conditioning the power of the conservator to transfer respondent to a nursing home, when medically indicated, upon court approval, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

Upon the testimony of respondent’s caseworker, the examining psychiatrist, the guardian ad litem, respondent’s ex-husband, her two children, and respondent herself, it was deter*254mined that a conservator should be appointed because she "suffered substantial impairment of her ability to care for her property and has become incapable of managing her affairs”.

While respondent disagrees, the record amply demonstrates that she needs help in managing her property. Indeed, respondent is unable to cope with her financial peril by taking advantage of the potential value of her artwork. The IAS court appropriately appointed the community guardian agency as conservator *(see, e.g., Matter of Salz,*80 AD2d 769).

Section 77.19 of the Mental Hygiene Law authorizes a court to approve a plan for a conservatee’s well-being and states that the provision of social and protective services may be included in such a plan. However, the order in this case delegated to the conservator the authority to make a nursing home placement at any time in the future without requiring court approval. Accordingly, the order is modified to the extent of authorizing placement in a nursing home based on evidence presented to the court demonstrating such a need *(see, e.g., Matter of Detzel,*134 AD2d 205). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Asch, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS

E ASTLAND

, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

David Frank Morgan

, * From the 118th District

Court of Howard County,

Trial Court No. 8094

.

Vs. No. 11

- 12

- 0034 2

- CR * February 7, 2013

State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Willson , J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the appeal should be

dismissed for want of jurisdiction . Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opinion, th e appeal

is dismissed for want of jurisdiction

.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 3, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 161-162]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-00027]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP96-116-000]


NorAm Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

December 27, 1995.
    Take notice that on December 21, 1995, NorAm Gas Transmission 
Company (NGT), 1600 Smith Street, Houston, Texas 77002, filed a request 


[[Page 162]]

with the Commission in Docket No. CP96-116-000 pursuant to Sections 
157.205, and 157.211 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural 
Gas Act (NGA) for authorization to operate certain existing facilities 
in Arkansas authorized in blanket certificate issued in CP82-384-000 
and amended CP82-384-001, all as more fully set forth in the request on 
file with the Commission and open to public inspection.
    NGT proposes to operate one 2-inch tap and 4-inch U-Shape meter 
station located on NGT's Line AC as jurisdictional facilities to 
provide jurisdictional service, including transportation services under 
Subpart G of Part 284 of the Commission's Regulations. NGT states the 
facilities were initially constructed solely to provide services 
authorized under Section 311 of the NGA and Subpart B of the 
Commission's Regulations. The estimated volumes to be delivered through 
these facilities are approximately 300,000 MMBtu annually and 1,000 
MMBtu on a peak day. The cost of construction was $8,375 which was 
reimbursed by ARKLA, a distribution division of NorAm Energy 
Corporation.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after the 
Commission has issued this notice, file pursuant to Rule 214 of the 
Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to intervene or 
notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of the 
Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to the request. If 
no protest is filed within the allowed time, the proposed activity 
shall be deemed to be authorized effective the day after the time 
allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed and not withdrawn 
within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a protest, the instant 
request shall be treated as an application for authorization pursuant 
to Section 7 of the NGA.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-00027 Filed 1-2-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 23.2

            CONSENT OF REGISTERED AUDITORS AND CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS


As registered auditors and chartered accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of our report dated February 23, 1998, on the
financial statements of The MBL Group Plc as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and
for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 1997, included
in NFO Worldwide, Inc.'s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 1997 into NFO Worldwide, Inc.'s previously filed Registration Statements,
File Nos. 33-73516, 33-83002, 33-91936, 333-24297, 333-24299 and 333-38497.


/s/ Soteriou Banerji
--------------------
London, England
March 27, 1998.