alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Money Tree Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A
for the quarter ended December 25, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Bradley D. Bellville, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Steven P. Morrison,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                         
|------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------
|Date: June 3,
2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Bradley D. Bellville
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Bradley D. Bellville    
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer 
|                   |  |  | 
|Date: June 3,
2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Steven P. Morrison  
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Steven P. Morrison      
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT32.02**

**Section 1350 Certification**

In connection with thisquarterly report of ML Aspect FuturesAccess LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I, Michael L. Pungello, VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

1. This Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2. The informationcontained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: August 14,2006
| By                                           | /s/ MICHAEL L. PUNGELLO |   |
|----------------------------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
| Michael L. Pungello                          |
| Vice President and Chief Financial Officer   |
| (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |

 

----
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6013

Aisin World Corp. of America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 74 (Tuesday, April 18, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19401-19402]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9475]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Central and Southern Holding Company; Acquisition of Company 
Engaged in Permissible Nonbanking Activities

    The organization listed in this notice has applied under Sec.  
225.23(a)(2) or (f) of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.23(a)(2) or 
(f)) for the Board's approval under section 4(c)(8) of the Bank Holding 
Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843(c)(8)) and Sec.  225.21(a) of Regulation Y 
(12 CFR 225.21(a)) to acquire or control voting securities or assets of 
a company engaged in a nonbanking activity that is listed in Sec.  
225.25 of Regulation Y as closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank [[Page 19402]] holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, such 
activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    The application is available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. Once the application has been accepted 
for processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing on the question whether consummation of the proposal can 
``reasonably be expected to produce benefits to the public, such as 
greater convenience, increased competition, or gains in efficiency, 
that outweigh possible adverse effects, such as undue concentration of 
resources, decreased or unfair competition, conflicts of interests, or 
unsound banking practices.'' Any request for a hearing on this question 
must be accompanied by a statement of the reasons a written 
presentation would not suffice in lieu of a hearing, identifying 
specifically any questions of fact that are in dispute, summarizing the 
evidence that would be presented at a hearing, and indicating how the 
party commenting would be aggrieved by approval of the proposal.
    Comments regarding the application must be received at the Reserve 
Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than 
May 2, 1995.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Zane R. Kelley, Vice President) 
104 Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303:
    1. Central and Southern Holding Company, Milledgeville, Georgia; to 
acquire 5.7 percent of Nova Financial Corporation, Atlanta, Georgia, 
and thereby engage in management consulting activities, pursuant to 
Sec.  225.25(b)(11) of the Board's Regulation Y. The proposed activity 
will be conducted throughout the state of Georgia.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 12, 
1995.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-9475 Filed 4-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-6280

CW Bearing USA, Inc: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Wiley E. GRANT, Appellant. Wiley E. GRANT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. WD 44613, WD 45632.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Dec. 22, 1992.

Brad B. Baker, Columbia, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Elizabeth L. Ziegler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before BERREY, P.J., and ULRICH and SMART, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Wiley E. Grant appeals his conviction for driving while intoxicated, section 577.010, RSMo 1986. Mr. Grant was sentenced as a *407prior offender, section 558.016, RSMo 1986, to four years incarceration. Additionally, Mr. Grant appeals the denial of his postcon-viction motion, Rule 29.15. The appeal from the judgment of conviction and the appeal from the judgment denying the postconviction motion are consolidated. The judgment of conviction is affirmed. The denial of the Rule 29.15 postconviction motion is affirmed. Rules 84.16(b) and 30.-25(b).
ffgg_ex102.htm


EXHIBIT 10.2


PRE-INCORPORATION AGREEMENT












This Agreement (“Agreement”) is made and entered into as of January 2, 2009 to memorialize an oral agreement made on that date by and between Matthew L. Schissler (“Schissler”) and Jonathan F. Irwin (“Irwin”).


 


WHEREAS,  Schissler and Irwin  have commenced negotiations with Joseph Masters (“Masters”) and Phillip Nagele (“Nagele”), owners of an ice cream shipping business, SendIceCreamNet LLC, to purchase selected assets of SendIceCreamNet LLC; and


 


WHEREAS, Schissler and Irwin intend to invest in or raise additional capital for a New Corporation to be formed;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, Schissler and Irwin agree as follows:


 



	
        1.  

	
Acquisition.  Any assets of SendIceCream LLC shall be acquired by Schissler and Irwin directly or through a New Corporation. Any assets shall be contributed to the New Corporation.













	
        2.  

	
Ownership and Management.  Schissler and Irwin shall initially own 100% of the shares of  the  New Corporation  in a proportion that shall be agreed upon at the time of incorporation and shall be the initial directors and officers of  the New Corporation and authorized to obtain tax identification numbers, open bank accounts, enter into contracts and take all necessary and appropriate action to qualify the New Corporation to engage in business, raise capital and to conduct business operations solely through  corporate form.













	
        3.  

	
Reservation of Ownership Interest in New Corporation for Acquisition of Assets.   Up to 15% of the ownership of the New Corporation shall be reserved for issuance to Masters and Nagele as partial compensation for the assets.  Shares representing such ownership shall be distributed to Masters and Nagele as specified in an agreement executed to close the purchase transaction for the assets.  Any ownership interest transferred to Masters and Nagele shall be fully dilutable.













	
        4.  

	
Governing Law.  This Agreement shall be governed in all respects by the laws of the State of Delaware.













	
        5.  

	
Counterparts and Facsimile.  This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be valid and enforceable against the parties executing the counterparts and all of which together shall constitute one agreement.  A facsimile signature shall be considered the same as an original.







 




  





1











  






 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have caused this Agreement to be duly executed as of the day and year set forth above.









	 	 	 	 	 
	
/s/ Matthew L. Schissler

	 	 	
/s/ Jonathan F. Irwin

	 
	
Matthew L. Schissler

	 	 	
Jonathan F. Irwin

	 





 


 




  





2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6959

WALLACE GAITHER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

and

CHARLES EVERETTE HINTON; ALLEN J. BUTTKE; STANLEY M. 

DRAUGHON; WALTER KEVIN JOHNSON,

Plaintiffs,

v.

ROY COOPER; ERIK A. HOOKS; MICHAEL HARDEE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. Richard Ernest Myers, II, District Judge. (5:20-ct-03153-M)

Submitted: September 24, 2020 Decided: September 29, 2020

Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Wallace Gaither, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Wallace Gaither appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint without 

prejudice for failure to prosecute or comply with court orders. On appeal, we confine our 

review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Gaither’s 

informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, he has 

forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 

(4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, 

our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we deny Gaither’s 

motion for a transcript at the government’s expense and affirm the district court’s 

judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-6321

PEER Bearing Company: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
```

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 103 (Tuesday, June 1, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 29270]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-11477]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Sleep Disorders 
Research Advisory Board.
    The meeting will be open to the public. Individuals who plan to 
attend and need special assistance, such as sign language 
interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should notify the 
Contact Person listed below in advance of the meeting.

    Name of Committee: Sleep Disorders Research Advisory Board.
    Date: June 24, 2021.
    Time: 12:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m.
    Agenda: The purpose of this meeting is to review the Sleep 
Research Plan for approval by the SDRAB. A full draft of the Sleep 
Research Plan is available at ncsdr.ideascale.com.
    Place: Virtual-Teleconference and Zoomgov.
    Telephone Access: 1-646-828-7666 (Meeting ID: 161 106 8592; 
Passcode: 576739)
    Virtual Access: https://nih.zoomgov.com (Meeting ID:161 106 
8592; Passcode: 576739)
    Contact Person: Marishka Brown, Ph.D., SDRAB Executive 
Secretary, Director, National Center on Sleep Disorders Research, 
National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood 
Institute, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Suite 407B, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
301-435-0199, [email protected].

    Any interested person may file written comments with the 
committee by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed 
on this notice. The statement should include the name, address, 
telephone number and when applicable, the business or professional 
affiliation of the interested person.
    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: www.nhlbi.nih.gov/meetings/index.htm, where an agenda and any 
additional information for the meeting will be posted when 
available.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 26, 2021.
David W. Freeman,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-11477 Filed 5-28-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

In connection with this Report on Form 10-Q of
Foundation Coal Corporation for the period ended September 30, 2006, I, Frank J. Wood, Chief Financial Officer of Foundation Coal Holdings, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|1. | This Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in this Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Foundation Coal Corporation.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2006 |  | /S/ FRANK J. WOOD                    
|                        |  | Frank J. Wood Chief Financial
Officer
Opinion issued December 9, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 1 4 - 00 608 - C R NO. 01 - 14 - 00609 - CR NO. 01 - 14 - 00610 - CR

——————————— KIM LY LIM , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee On Appeal from the 262nd District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No s . 1419352 , 1419353, and 1419354

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Kim Ly Lim , has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal s . The motion is signed by the appellant and his attorney, in compliance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a). See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.2(a). No opinion has2

issued , and more than 10 days have passed and no party has responded to the motion. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 10.3(a). Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal s . See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42. 2 (a) , 43.2(f) . We dismiss all other pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle

. Do not publish. T EX . R. A PP . P. 47.2( b).
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


OF HEALTH
BENEFITS DIRECT CORPORATION REQUIRED


BY RULE
13a-14(b) UNDER THE EXCHANGE ACT





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Health Benefits Direct Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Anthony R. Verdi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that, based on
my knowledge:





(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





August
16, 2010


/s/ ANTHONY R. VERDIAnthony
      R. VerdiChief
      Operating Officer and Chief Financial
Officer
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7584

Hatfield Manufacturing: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_5-30-2019.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel