alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-7185

Tenova S.p.A:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
<Page>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 31.01

                     RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS

I, Robert M. Alderman, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of ML Winton FuturesAccess LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

   a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
   disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
   ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
   consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
   entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
   prepared; and

   b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
   procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
   effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
   period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

   c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
   over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
   fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
   materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
   reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

   a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
   operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
   likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
   summarize and report financial information; and

   b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
   employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
   over financial reporting.

Date: August 12, 2005

By /s/ ROBERT M. ALDERMAN
   ----------------------
Robert M. Alderman
Chief Executive Officer, President and Manager
(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 31.2

SARBANES-OXLEY  SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I,
Edward M. Krell, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Mothers Work, Inc;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors:



Date:
December 23, 2003

|/s/EDWARD M. KRELLEdward M. Krell Executive Vice President-Chief
Financial Officer |  |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  | 

---

QuickLinks
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-7405

Nissan North America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6818

Omron Management Center of America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Enrique Oliva, Appellant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Edwin Torres, J.), rendered on July 12, 1989, which convicted defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the second degree and sentenced him, as a predicate felon, to an indeterminate prison term of *IVi*to 15 years, is unanimously affirmed.

Duk Chun Cho was on his way home from work when he was robbed by defendant and several accomplices at the entrance of a subway station. The accomplices fled but Cho managed to struggle with defendant and hold him until the police arrived. After speaking to each man separately, the officers arrested defendant.

Defendant asserts that the court imposed the maximum sentence because of bias against Cubans. Defendant’s contention is without support in the record, which demonstrates that the trial court relied exclusively upon appropriate sentencing considerations. The term imposed was clearly justified.

Defendant raises several claims regarding the prosecutor’s summation. These issues are unpreserved as a matter of law. If we were to consider them in the interest of justice, we would nonetheless affirm, although we note that the prosecutor’s remarks in summation exceeded the bounds of pro*322priety. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Carro, Asch, Ellerin and Smith, JJ.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-13-00342-CV

LONE STAR NATIONAL BANK,

Appellant

v.

TEXAS CERTIFIED DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC.,

Appellee

From the 111th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-CVF-001535D2

Honorable Monica Z. Notzon, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: November 27, 2013

MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; DISMISSED

Appellant filed a motion to dismiss this appeal, stating that the parties have resolved all 

issues in dispute between them. The motion further requests expedited issuance of the mandate 

and states that appellee does not oppose the request. We grant the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P.

18.1(c), 42.1(a)(1).

Appellant’s motion does not disclose an agreement of the parties regarding the assessment 

of costs. Accordingly, we order all costs assessed against appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d)

(absent agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against appellant).
04-13-00342-CV 

We dismiss the appeal and the clerk of this court is ordered to immediately issue the 

mandate. 

PER CURIAM

2
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report ofBulldog Financial, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A-1 for the period ended November 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Scott McDowell, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated this 7th day of November, 2006.



| | SCOTT MCDOWELL                                     
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Scott McDowell                                     
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



















---
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata and coll ateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### MAY 27 1997 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT
In re: DWIGHT WILLIAM ZWICK,

Debtor,

---------------------------------------------- FLEET RESOURCES, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellee,
v. DWIGHT WILLIAM ZWICK,

Defendant-Appellant. No. 96-1366 (Dist. of Colorado) (D.C. No. 94-D-2192

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before BRORBY , BRISCOE, and MURPHY , Circuit Judges. Dwight Zwick appeals a district court order holding that his state court judgment for fraudulent concealment is nondischarge able pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A) and (B). On appeal, Zwick argues thatto prevail in a nondischargeability action under section 523(a)(2), a creditor must prove it was-2-

damaged as a proximate result of a debtor’s materia lly false statement. Zwick further argues that because the state court judgment at issue here does not satisfy the requirement of proximate causation, the distric t court erred in ruling that the judgment was exempt from discharge under section 52 3(a)(2). The court exercises jurisdiction over this appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(d) and affirms
. This court has reviewed the parties’ briefs and contentions, the district court order, and the entire record on appeal. Find ing Zwick’s appeal without merit, we affirm for substantially the reasons set out in the district court’s order dated July 15, 1996. In so doing, this court makes the following observation: contrary to Zwick’s assertions on appeal, in the Te nth Circuit a creditor need not prove that it was damaged as a proximate result of the debtor’s misrepresentations in order to prevail on a nondischargeability actionunder section 523(a)(2). See John Deere Co. v. Gerlach (In re Gerlach) , 897 F.2d 1048, 1051 & n.2 (10th Cir. 1990); see also Norris v. First Nat’l Bank (In re Norris) , 70 F.3d 27, 29 & n.6 (5th Cir. 1995) (joining the First and Tenth Circui ts in refusing to “graft[]onto section 523(a)(2) a proximate causation” element); Shawmut Bank, N.A. v. Goodrich (In re Goodrich) , 999 F.2d 22, 26 (1st Cir. 1993) (citing with appr oval to this court’s decision in Gerlach for proposition that section 523(a)(2) does not contain a damages element).-3-

The judgment of the United States District Court fo r the District of Colorado is hereby AFFIRMED
. ENTERED FOR THE COURT,
Michael R. Murphy Circuit Judge
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-6688

C&U Americas, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

****

**CAMBER ENERGY, INC.Certification Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Camber Energy, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2021, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James Doris, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                     
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







|Date: May 19, 2022 |  | */s/ James Doris*                       | 
|------------------ |  | --------------------------------------- | 
|                   |  | James Doris Principal Executive Officer |
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

April 12, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6165

Alter Trading Corporation: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_04.15.19.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Order entered May 6, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00473-CR

No. 05-18-00474-CR

RICKEY LECARDO MCGEE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F16-34511-H; F16-34499-H

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s pro se motion to recuse Chief Justice Robert Burns from 

the above-numbered appeals. Chief Justice Robert Burns is not on the panel to which the abovenumbered appeals will be submitted, and he will not be a participant in the disposition of these

appeals. Further, it appears appellant is represented by appointed counsel. A criminal defendant 

is not entitled to hybrid representation. See Robinson v. State, 240 S.W.3d 919, 922 (Tex. Crim.

App. 2007). Appellant’s motion to recuse is DENIED.

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES 

PRESIDING JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32.1



Section 906 Certification



The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and shall not be deemed filed pursuant to any provision of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or any other securities law.



Each of the undersigned certifies that the foregoing Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Broadwing Corporation.



|                   |  |                                                   |  |          |  |                                                             
|------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------- |  | -------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ David R. Huber |  | /s/ Lynn D. Anderson                             
|Name:              |  | David R. Huber                                    |  | Name:    |  | Lynn D. Anderson                                            
|Title:             |  | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |  | Title:   |  | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|Company:           |  | Broadwing Corporation                             |  | Company: |  | Broadwing Corporation                                       
|Date:              |  | November 9, 2004                                  |  | Date:    |  | November 9, 2004