alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Edward R. LEWIS, Jr., Defendant/Respondent.

No. 68967.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

June 18, 1996.

Dean R. Gallego, Asst. Pros. Atty., Franklin County, Union, for appellant.

Eckelkamp, Eekelkamp, Wood & Kuenzel, Gael D. Wood and James W. McGettigan, Jr., Washington, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and GRIMM, JJ.

KAROHL, Judge.

The State of Missouri appeals dismissal of a driving while intoxicated charge against defendant, Edward R. Lewis, Jr. The trial court found the prosecution of the charge was barred by the constitutional prohibition against Double Jeopardy because defendant previously had his license administratively suspended.

This case is controlled by the Missouri Supreme Court’s recent decision in *State v. Mayo,*915 S.W.2d 758 (Mo. banc 1996). There, the court held the sanction of a license revocation or suspension is not punishment for the purposes of the Double Jeopardy Clause. It held a charge of driving while intoxicated is not barred by Double Jeopardy because the defendant’s license had been administratively suspended. Thus, it reversed the trial court’s dismissal of the charge against defendant. The facts of the present case are identical to those in *Mayo*and the holding is equally decisive.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

REINHARD, P.J., and GRIMM, J„ concur.
Exhibit 23.1






               Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors


We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  Registration  Statements
(Form S-8 No. 33-15019)  pertaining to the 1993 Incentive Stock Option and Stock
Appreciation  Rights  Plan,  (Form S-8 No.  33-  15029)  pertaining  to the 1994
Incentive Stock Option Plan and Stock  Appreciation  Rights Plan,  (Form S-8 No.
33-15017)  pertaining to the 1993 Non-qualified  Stock Option Plan and (Form S-8
No.  33-92808)  pertaining to the 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan and Trust of Martin
Color-Fi,  Inc. of our report  dated  February  13,  1998,  (except for the last
paragraph  of Note 6, as to which the date is March 4, 1998) with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Martin Color-Fi, Inc. included
in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1997.


                                                 /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Greenville, South Carolina
March 30, 1998
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Kevin Lee RAY, Defendant/Respondent.

No. 69344.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

April 30, 1996.

Blake R. Fischer, Asst. Pros. Atty., Franklin County, Union, for Appellant.

Schwethye Law Offices, Robert L. Davis, Union, for Respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and GRIMM, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The State of Missouri appeals the dismissal of the driving while intoxicated charge against defendant Kevin Lee Ray. The trial court found the prosecution of the charge violated the Double Jeopardy Clause because *144defendant previously had his license administratively suspended.

This case is controlled by the Missouri Supreme Court’s recent decision in *State v. Mayo,*915 S.W.2d 758 (Mo. banc 1996). There, the court held a charge of driving while intoxicated is not barred by Double Jeopardy because the defendant’s license had been administratively suspended. Thus, it reversed the trial court’s dismissal of the charge against the defendant.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.
Exhibit 10.12


 


Marten
Transport, Ltd.


Named
Executive Officers’ Compensation Summary


 


On May 4, 2010, the
company’s Compensation Committee approved an approximately 6% increase to the
base salary for the company’s named executive officers listed below, retroactive
to April 26, 2010.  Effective April 26, 2010, the named
executive officers are scheduled to receive the following annual base salaries
in the listed positions:


 


	
  Name and Position as of
  May 4, 2010

  	
   

  	
  Base Salary

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Randolph L. Marten

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  521,123

  	
   

  
	
  (Chairman and Chief
  Executive Officer)

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Timothy M. Kohl

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  371,000

  	
   

  
	
  (President)

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Robert G. Smith

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  262,756

  	
   

  
	
  (Chief Operating Officer)

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Timothy P. Nash

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  262,756

  	
   

  
	
  (Executive Vice President
  of Sales and Marketing)

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  James J. Hinnendael

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  207,352

  	
   

  
	
  (Chief Financial Officer)

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  



 


1
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5868

Scosche Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Theresa Q. Hoffmann, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Universal Capital Management, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: September 11, 2009

/s/ Theresa Q. Hoffmann

Theresa Q. Hoffmann,

Principal Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Deep Field Technologies, Inc. ("the
Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark
Meller, President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: September 16, 2005               /s/ Mark Meller
                                       ----------------------------------
                                       Mark Meller, President,
                                       Chief Executive Officer and Principal
                                       Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 69 (Tuesday, April 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 18402]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8880]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-5188-5]


Acid Rain Program: Notice of the Filing of Petition for 
Administrative Review

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of the filing of petition for administrative review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On January 27, 1995, Indianapolis Power and Light Company 
filed, with the EPA Environmental Appeals Board, a petition for review 
of the Phase I Acid Rain Permits for the Petersburg and H T Pritchard 
power plants. This appeal was filed under 40 CFR part 78 of the Acid 
Rain regulations. Motions for leave to intervene in the proceeding 
under 40 CFR 78.11 must be filed by May 11, 1995 with the Environmental 
Appeals Board.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dwight C. Alpern, Attorney-Advisor, 
Acid Rain Division (6204J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M 
Street SW, Washington, DC 20460 at (202) 233-9151.

    Dated: March 30, 1995.
Brian J. McLean,
Director, Acid Rain Division, Office of Atmospheric Programs, Office of 
Air and Radiation.
[FR Doc. 95-8880 Filed 4-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5481 

To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to establish an 

Office of Rural Health, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 14, 2023 

Mr. GUEST (for himself and Ms. PEREZ) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to 

establish an Office of Rural Health, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CDC OFFICE OF RURAL HEALTH. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Health and 

5 Human Services, acting through the Director of the Cen6 ters for Disease Control and Prevention, shall establish 

7 within the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention an 

8 office to be known as the Office of Rural Health, to be 

9 headed by a director selected by the Director of the Cen10 ters for Disease Control and Prevention. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5481 IH

1 (b) DUTIES AND AUTHORITIES.—The duties and au2 thorities of the Director of the Office of Rural Health shall 

3 be limited to the following: 

4 (1) Serving as the primary point of contact in 

5 the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on 

6 matters pertaining to rural health. 

7 (2) Assisting the Director of the Centers for 

8 Disease Control and Prevention in conducting, co9 ordinating, and promoting research regarding public 

10 health issues affecting rural populations, and in dis11 seminating the results of such research. 

12 (3) Working with all personnel and offices of 

13 the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to 

14 develop, refine, coordinate, and promulgate policies, 

15 best practices, lessons learned, and innovative, suc16 cessful programs to improve care and services (in17 cluding through telehealth) for rural populations. 

18 (4) Coordinating and supporting rural health 

19 research, conducting and supporting educational out20 reach, and disseminating evidence-based interven21 tions related to health outcomes, access to health 

22 care, and lifestyle challenges, to prevent death, dis23 ease, injury, and disability, and promote healthy be24 haviors in rural populations. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 5481 IH

1 (5) Improving the understanding of the health 

2 challenges faced by rural populations. 

3 (6) Identifying disparities in the availability of 

4 health care and public health interventions for rural 

5 populations. 

6 (7) Awarding and administering grants, cooper7 ative agreements, and contracts to provide technical 

8 assistance and other activities as necessary to sup9 port activities related to improving health and health 

10 care in rural areas. 

11 (8) Coordinating with the Federal Office of 

12 Rural Health Policy of the Health Resources and 

13 Services Administration, as needed, to facilitate co14 operation on rural health initiatives and avoid dupli15 cation of efforts. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**SARBANES-OXLEY**

**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Dan W. Matthias,certify that:

 

       1.     Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Mothers Work, Inc;

 

       2.     Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

       3.     Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

       4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

       (a)   Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

       (b)   Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

       (c)   Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

       5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors:

 

       (a)   Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

       (b)   Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

Date: December 14,2004

 
| /s/  DAN  W. MATTHIAS |
|---------------------------------|
| Dan  W. Matthias                |
| *Chief  Executive Officer*      |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SAFETY 1ST
FORM 10K  FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-K
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         509,403
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               23,537,347
<ALLOWANCES>                                 3,300,000
<INVENTORY>                                 17,145,683
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            43,857,365
<PP&E>                                      16,548,577
<DEPRECIATION>                             (4,385,545)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              71,276,652
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       68,937,789
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        71,781
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,006,431
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                71,276,652
<SALES>                                    105,751,954
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           105,751,954
<CGS>                                       88,978,995
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               88,978,995
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            65,981,145
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,099,805
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (53,307,991)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (8,458,779)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (44,849,212)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (44,849,212)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (6.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (6.27)


</TABLE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-5193

Nissan North America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

“Made in China 2025” or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
##### 



Re: Employment Terms
    1. Duties
   2. Base Salary, Benefits and Term
   
    
    Company will provide for your housing in Ridgefield, CT in the form of direct rental
payments, not to exceed $2,250 per month, for a mutually agreed upon one-bedroom,
furnished apartment within reasonable distance of the ACP facility.
    
    Company will provide for the shipping of one vehicle, not to exceed $1,500, by a
mutually agreed upon third-party from San Diego,CA to Ridgefield, CT by October 1,2005,
and provide for shipment back to San Diego, CA at the end of the term.
    
    Company will reimburse you for up to two (2) round-trip coach airline tickets per
month,




---



##### 



not to exceed $500 per ticket without prior approval by Mr. Steube, for travel between
Ridgefield, CT and San Diego, CA, or other domestic destination mutually agreed upon with
Mr. Steube.
 3. Stock Options
 th
 4. Bonus
  a.)
    
    Upon completion of 6 months of service at the Ridgefield, CT location, 50% of
the shares in your option will become fully vested and you will be paid a one-time
cash bonus of $25,000.b.)
    
    Upon completion of 12 months of service at the Ridgefield, CT location, the
remaining shares in the option will become vested, and you will be paid an additional
one-time cash bonus of $25,000.
 5. Loyal and Conscientious Performance; Noncompetition.




---



##### 



6. Termination
   7. Proprietary Information and Inventions Agreement
    8. Entire Agreement
  9. Governing Law




---



##### 



10.
Successors and Assigns.
  
  Sincerely,
 PLANET TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
 Bret E. Megargel
 Vice President, Marketing
 Accepted:
 TINA MENDOZA