19406 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 74 / Tuesday, April 18, 1995 / Notices

A portion of the meeting of the

SAMHSA National Advisory Council

will be open and will include a

discussion of SAMHSA’s

reauthorization and budget issues, the

SAMHSA strategic plan and managed

care activities within the Agency. In

addition, there will be status reports by

the Council’s workgroups on Health

Care Reform, AIDS, Program Evaluation,

and Co-Occurring Mental Illness and

Substance Use Disorders. Attendance by

the public will be limited to space

available.

The meeting will also include the

review, discussion and evaluation of

contract proposals. Therefore, a portion

of the meeting will be closed to the

public as determined by the

Administrator, SAMHSA, in accordance

with 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (3), (4) and (6) and

5 U.S.C. app. 2 10(d).

A summary of the meeting and a

roster of council members may be

obtained from: Ms. Susan E. Day,

Program Assistant, SAMHSA National

Advisory Council, 5600 Fishers Lane,

Room 12C–15, Rockville, Maryland

20857. Telephone: (301) 443–4640.

Substantive program information may

be obtained from the contact whose

name and telephone number is listed

below.

Committee name: Substance Abuse and

Mental Health Services Administration,

National Advisory Council.

Meeting date: May 15, 1995.

Place: Chevy Chase Holiday Inn, PalladianEast Room, 5520 Wisconsin Avenue, Chevy

Chase, Maryland.

Open: May 15, 1995, 9 a.m. to 3 p.m.

Closed: May 15, 1995, 3:15 p.m. to 6:30

p.m.

Contact: Toian Vaughn, Room 12C–15,

Parklawn Building, Telephone (301) 443–

4640.

Dated: April 12, 1995.

Jeri Lipov,

Committee Management Officer, SAMHSA.

[FR Doc. 95–9473 Filed 4–17–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4162–20–P

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND

URBAN DEVELOPMENT

Office of the Assistant Secretary for

Public and Indian Housing

[Docket No. N–95–3847; FR–3828–N–03]

NOFA for the Public and Indian

Housing Tenant Opportunities

Program Technical Assistance:

Amendment

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant

Secretary for Public and Indian

Housing, HUD.

ACTION: FY 1995 funding availability;

notice of amendment.

SUMMARY: On March 1, 1995, HUD

announced the availability of $25

million for FY 1995 under the Public

and Indian Housing Tenant

Opportunities Program (TOP). This

notice removes the requirement for

National Resident Organizations

(NROs), Regional Resident

Organizations (RROs), and Statewide

Resident Organizations (SROs) to

provide evidence of support by the local

housing authority as a rating factor, and

narrative descriptions. This change also

applies to the Application Kit and

hence, evidence of support from the

Housing Authority is not required.

DATES: This notice does NOT revise or

extend the application deadline set forth

in the March 1, 1995 NOFA.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Christine Jenkins or Barbara J.

Armstrong, Office of Community

Relations and Involvement, Department

of Housing and Urban Development,

451 Seventh Street SW., Room 4112,

Washington, D.C. 20410; telephone:

(202) 708–3611. All Indian Housing

applicants may contact Charles Bell,

Office of Native American Programs,

Department of Housing and Urban

Development, 451 Seventh Street SW.,

Room B–133, Washington, DC 20410;

telephone: (202) 755–0032. Hearing- or

speech-impaired persons may use the

Telecommunications Devices for the

Deaf (TDD) by contacting the Federal

Information Relay Service on 1–800–

877–TDDY (1–800–877–8339) or (202)

708–9300 for information on the

program. (Other than the ‘‘800’’ TDD

number, telephone number are not tollfree.)

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a

Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA)

published in the Federal Register on

March 1, 1995 (60 FR 11222), the

Department announced the availability

of $25 million for the Public and Indian

Housing Tenant Opportunities Program,

of which $1 million is set aside for

National Resident Organizations

(NROs), Regional Resident

Organizations (RRO), and Statewide

Resident Organizations (SRO). The

Department is removing the requirement

for NROs/RROs/SROs to provide

evidence of support from the local

housing authority. For further

information about specific aspects of the

NOFA and application requirements,

please refer to the March 1, 1995 NOFA.

Accordingly, FR Doc. 95–4968, NOFA

for the Public and Indian Housing

Tenant Opportunities Program

Technical Assistance, published on

March 1, 1995 (60 FR 11222), is

amended as follows:

1. On page 11229, column 1, under

Section I.M of the NOFA (Rating

Factors—NROs/RROs/SROs) rating

factor 2 is amended by revising the

heading of this factor and by revising

the paragraph concerning the ‘‘high

score’’ to read as follows:

(2) Evidence of Support by NRO/RRO/

SRO Board of Directors. (Maximum

Points: 10):

• A high score (Maximum Points: 10)

is received where the NRO/RRO/SRO

provides documentation that shows

support from its board of directors, as

evidenced by a board resolution,

minutes of meetings, and letters of

support.

2. On page 11229, column 1, under

Section I.M of the NOFA (Rating

Factors—NROs/RROs/SROs) rating

factor 3 is amended by revising the

introductory paragraph and by revising

the paragraphs concerning ‘‘high score’’

and ‘‘low score’’ to read as follows:

(3) Evidence of Prior Resident

Training Experience. This factor can be

demonstrated by the support of RCs/

RMCs/ROs. The letters of support

should indicate the success and quality

of prior training.

• A high score (Maximum Points: 30)

is received where the applicant provides

documentation that shows support by

the residents (i.e., letters of support,

board resolutions, and minutes of

meetings).

* * * * *

• Low score (Maximum Points: 5) is

received where the applicant fails to

provide documentation of support by

the development’s residents, but

support is mentioned.

3. On page 11230, column 3, under

Section II.B of the NOFA (Application

Submission and Development), factors 2

and 3 under paragraph (2)(b)(iv) are

revised to read as follows:

• Factor 2: A narrative describing the

extent to which the board of the NRO/

RRO/SRO supports the proposed

activities.

• Factor 3: A narrative describing the

applicant’s prior experience in training

residents, which can be demonstrated

by the support of the RCs/RMCs/ROs.

The letters of support should indicate

the success and quality of training.

4. On page 11230, column 3, under

Section II.B of the NOFA (Application

Submission and Development),

paragraph (3)(a) is revised to read as

follows:

(3) HA Support. (a) HUD is in full

support of a cooperative relationship

between each RC/RMC/RO and its HA.

A resident organization is urged to
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 74 / Tuesday, April 18, 1995 / Notices 19407

involve its HA in the application

planning and submission process. This

can be achieved through meetings to

discuss resident concerns and objectives

and how best to translate these

objectives into activities in the

application. The RC/RMC/RO is also

encouraged to obtain a letter of support

from the HA, indicating to what extent

the HA supports the proposed activities

listed by the RC/RMC/RO and how the

HA will assist the RC/RMC/RO.

* * * * *

Dated: April 12, 1995.

Kevin E. Marchman,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Office of

Distressed and Troubled Housing Recovery.

[FR Doc. 95–9450 Filed 4–17–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210–33–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service

Burro Management; Final

Environmental Impact Statement, Lake

Mead National Recreation Area;

Record of Decision

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 102(2)(C)

of the National Environmental Policy

Act of 1969 (P.L. 91–190 as amended),

and specifically to regulations

promulgated by the Council on

Environmental Quality at 40 CFR

1505.2, the National Park Service,

Department of the Interior, has

approved a Record of Decision for the

Final Environmental Impact Statement

on Burro Management for Lake Mead

National Recreation Area, Arizona and

Nevada.

The National Park Service will

implement the proposed action as

identified in the Final Environmental

Impact Statement for Burro

Management, issued March 3, 1995.

Copies of the Record of Decision may

be obtained from the Superintendent,

Lake Mead National Recreation Area,

601 Nevada Highway, Boulder City,

Nevada 89005; or by calling the park at

(702) 293–8949.

Dated: April 5, 1995.

Patricia L. Neubacher,

Regional Director, Western Region.

[FR Doc. 95–9489 Filed 4–17–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–70–M

National Park System Advisory Board;

Notice of Reestablishment

This notice is published in

accordance with Section 9(a)(2) of the

Federal Advisory Committee Act

(FACA), 5 U.S.C. App. (1988).

Following consultation with the General

Services Administration and the Office

of Management and Budget, notice is

hereby given that the Secretary of the

Interior is administratively

reestablishing an advisory committee

known as the National Park System

Advisory Board.

The purpose of this committee is to

advise the Director of the National Park

Service on matters relating to the

National Park Service, the National Park

System, and programs administered by

the National Park Service.

The Secretary of the Interior will

appoint to this committee 12 members

who have outstanding expertise in the

fields of history, archeology,

architecture, historical architecture,

landscape architecture, anthropology,

biology, ecology, or social science, or in

other professional disciplines important

to the mission of the National Park

Service. Consideration will be given to

a cross-section of qualified individuals

who are interested in and directly

affected by National Park Service

activities, and who represent divergent

points of view. Appointments will be

made from among individuals who have

been identified through contacts with

and among National Park Service and

Department of the Interior staff; other

Federal agencies; professional

organizations; institutions of higher

learning; and non-governmental

organizations having a special interest

in the mission of the National Park

Service; and the general public.

Certification

I hereby certify that the administrative

reestablishment of the National Park

System Advisory Board is necessary and

in the public interest in connection with

the performance of duties imposed on

the Department of the Interior by the

Act of August 25, 1916 (16 U.S.C. 1, et

seq.), as amended and supplemented,

and other statutes relating to the

administration of the National Park

System.

Dated: March 3, 1995.

Bruce Babbitt,

Secretary of the Interior.

[FR Doc. 95–9493 Filed 4–17–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-70-P

Notice of Inventory Completion of

Native American Human Remains

From the Site of Mo’omomi on Molokai,

HI in the Possession of the Los

Angeles County Museum of Natural

History, CA

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

Notice is hereby given in accordance

with provisions of the Native American

Graves Protection and Repatriation Act,

25 U.S.C. 3003(d), of the completion of

the inventory of human remains from

the site of Mo’omomi on Molokai, HI

that are presently in the possession of

the Los Angeles County Museum of

Natural History.

A detailed inventory and assessment

of these human remains has been made

by the Los Angeles County Museum of

Natural History’s curatorial staff in

consultation with representatives of Hui

Ma ̄lama I Na ̄ Ku ̄ puna ‘O Hawai‘i Nei, a

Native Hawaiian organization as defined

in 25 U.S.C. 3001(11).

The human remains consist of 36

whole and three fragmentary human

teeth. The human remains were donated

to the Los Angeles County Museum of

Natural History in 1927 by Dr. William

A. Bryan, then Director of the Los

Angeles County Museum. The remains

were catalogued as A.1463.27–36.

The catalog description states the

remains are a ‘‘box of human teeth from

the battle field of Momumi.’’ A

representative of Hui Ma ̄lama I Na ̄

Ku ̄ puna ‘O Hawai‘i Nei has identified

‘‘Momumi’’ as the site of Mo’omomi on

Molokai and has stated that the sand

dunes of Mo’omomi have long been

used as burial grounds of ancestral

Native Hawaiians. Reference to the

‘‘battlefield of Momumi’’ is thought to

refer to this burial area. The

representative of Hui Ma ̄lama I Na ̄

Ku ̄ puna ‘O Hawai‘i Nei has also

provided documentation that shows that

Bryan and others collected human

remains from Mo’omomi.

Inventory of the human remains and

review of the accompanying

documentation indicate that no known

individuals were identifiable. Based on

the above information, officials of the

Los Angeles County Museum of Natural

History have determined that pursuant

to 25 U.S.C. 3001(2), there is a

relationship of shared group identity

which can be reasonably traced between

these human remains and present-day

Native Hawaiian organizations.

This notice has been sent to officials

of Hui Ma ̄lama I Na ̄ Ku ̄ puna ‘O Hawai‘i

Nei, the Office of Hawaiian Affairs, and

the Molokai Island Burial Council.

Representatives of any other Native

Hawaiian organization which believes

itself to be culturally affiliated with

these human remains should contact Dr.

Margaret Ann Hardin, Curator and

Section Head, Anthropology, Los

Angeles County Museum of Natural

History, 900 Exposition Blvd., Los

Angeles, CA 90007, telephone: (213)

744–3382, before May 18, 1995.

Repatriation of these human remains to