alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5786

Tianhai Electric North America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
DISMISS and Opinion Filed May 27, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-21-00347-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.B.K., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 470th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 470-56492-2020

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Osborne, Pedersen, III, and Nowell

Opinion by Justice Osborne

Before the Court is appellant’s motion to dismiss this restricted appeal. We 

grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.

210347f.p05 /Leslie Osborne//

LESLIE OSBORNE

JUSTICE
–2–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

IN THE INTEREST OF A.B.K., A 

CHILD

No. 05-21-00347-CV 

On Appeal from the 470th Judicial 

District Court, Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 470-56492-

2020.

Opinion delivered by Justice Osborne. 

Justices Pedersen, III and Nowell 

participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is 

DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee the Texas Department of Family and 

Protective Services recover its costs of this appeal from appellant James Edward 

Moya, Jr.

Judgment entered this 27th day of May, 2021.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-K OF
FIRSTWAVE FOR YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.<F1>
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           2,245
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,146
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,786
<PP&E>                                           1,501
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,322
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,562
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,750
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,322
<SALES>                                          3,528
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,537
<CGS>                                              744
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,453
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,296
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    83
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   1
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3,034)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (91)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3,125)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.61)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.61)
        
<FN>
<F1>A/R AND PPE ASSET VALUES REPRESENT NET AMOUNTS.
</FN>

</TABLE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7566

Byson Electronics US, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXHIBIT
      32.2




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Juma Technology, Corp. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-QSB/A (Amendment No. 1) for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, Anthony Fernandez, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section. 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Anthony
                    FernandezAnthony
                          Fernandez
                        Chief
                          Financial Officer
  January
          30, 2008
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT In re : WALTER R . PINEDA, De

btor, WALTER

R . PINEDA, Appe lla

nt, v. B ANK OF AM E R IC A NA; e t a l., Appe lle e s. No. 13-60071 B AP No. 11-1719 M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Ninth C irc uit B ankruptc y

Appe lla te Pane l M arke ll, Dunn, a

nd Jury , B ankruptc y

Judge s, Pre siding Subm itte d

April 7, 2015 * * B e fore : FISHER , TALLM AN, a nd NGUYEN, C irc uit Judge s. 

# F IL ED APR 28 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).W a lte r R . Pine da a ppe a ls pro se from the B ankruptc y Appe lla te Pane l’ s (“ B AP” ) orde r a ffirm ing the b a nkruptc y c ourt’ s orde r a

bsta ining from

de c iding a

n a dve rsary proc e e ding a ga inst a

p pe lle e s. W e dism iss. W e la c k jurisdic tion to re vie w the ba nkruptc y c ourt’ s de c ision to a

bsta in pursua nt to 28 U.S.C . § 1334(c )(1). Se e 28 U.S.C . § 1334(d). W e re je c t Pine da ’ s c o nte ntion tha t the B A P viola

te d his due proc e s s rights in the h andling of his a

ppe a l. DISM I SSE D.

1 3 - 6 0 0 7 1 2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with
the Quarterly Report of Fountain Healthy Aging, Inc (the "Company") on Form 10-Q
for the period ending June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul Hunston, Chief Financial
Officer and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:  (1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  Date August 14,
2009   /s/ Paul
Hunston Name: Paul
Hunston Title: Chief
Financial Officer Chief
Executive Officer
J-S50033- 14

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee

v. CHARLES STEPHON WILLIAMS, Appellant No. 350 WDA 2014

Appeal from the Order entered February 6 , 2014, in the Court of Common Pleas of Erie County, Criminal Division, at No(s): CP

- 25

- CR -0000251-1996
BEFORE: FORD ELLIOTT, P.J.E., SHOGAN, and ALLEN, JJ

. JUDGMENT ORDER BY ALLEN, J.: FILED AUGUST 11, 2014 In this pro se appeal, Charles Stephon Williams (“Appellant”) appeals from the order denying his request for post-conviction D NA testing under section 9543.1 of the Po st

- Conviction Relief Act (“PCRA”). In Appellant’s previous appeal, this Court concluded tha t “the language of § 9543.1 clearly precludes that section’s application t o petitioners seeking to challenge convictions resulting in guilty pleas by ref erence to DNA evidence.” Williams v. Erie County Dist. Atty’s Office , 848 A.2d 967, 972 (Pa. Super. 2004), appeal denied , 864 A.2d 530 (Pa. 2004). Thus, because this Court previously concluded that Appellant’s g uilty plea prevents him from seeking relief based on DNA evidence, the PCR A court properly denied Appellant’s request. See Commonwealth v. Gacobano , 65 A.3d 416, 419- 20 (Pa. Super. 2013) (applying “law of the case” doctri ne toJ-S50033- 14

- 2 -

second request for DNA testing, when this Court in a pr evious appeal affirmed the PCRA court’s denial of the appellant’s section 9543.1 motion). Order affirmed. Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. Prothonotary

Date: 8/11/2014
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with
the Quarterly  Report of B Green Innovations, Inc. Inc. (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2015, as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned,
in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certify, pursuant  to and solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



1.The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



2.The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.







|Date:
                                         August
14, 2015 | By: | /s/ Jerome Mahoney                                            
|-------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                               |     | Jerome Mahoney                                                
|                                                               |     | President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
|                                                               |     |                                                               
|
#### Esther KARFELD, et al., Appellant, v. Barbara GLASSMAN, Jake Glassman and Edward Karfeld, Respondents.

No. 68633.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

April 16, 1996.

Irwin M. Roitman, Clayton, for appellant.

Irvin R. Zwibelman, Clayton, Terry A. Bond, Clayton, for respondents.

Before CRAHAN, P.J., and CRANDALL and DOWD, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Esther Karfeld appeals a directed verdict in favor of Respondents Barbara Glassman, Jake Glassman and Edward Kar-feld in an action to set aside a deed. Appellant complains the court erred in excluding certain evidence on hearsay grounds, and erroneously applied the law to the facts. We have reviewed the briefs and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 72 (Friday, April 14, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 19046]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9200]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Project 2442-001 New York]


City of Watertown; Notice of Availability of Draft Environmental 
Assessment

April 10, 1995.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission's) 
Regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office 
of Hydropower Licensing has reviewed the application for major new 
license for the proposed Watertown Project, located in Jefferson County 
and has prepared a Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) for the 
project. In the DEA, the Commission's staff has analyzed the potential 
environmental impacts of the proposed project and has concluded that 
approval of the project, with appropriate mitigation or enhancement 
measures, would not constitute a major federal action significantly 
affecting the quality of the human environment.
    Copies of the DEA are available for review in the Public Reference 
Branch, Room 3104, of the Commission's offices at 941 North Capitol 
Street N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426.
    Please submit any comments within 30 days from the date of this 
notice and should be addressed to Lois D. Cashell, Secretary, Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426. Please affix Project No. 2442-001 to all 
comments. For further information, please contact Peter Leitzke, 
Environmental Coordinator, at (202) 219-2803.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-9200 Filed 4-13-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### CITY OF KIRKWOOD, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Boaz RAFAELI, Defendant/Appellant.

No. 65034.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Nov. 22, 1994.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Jan. 10, 1995.

Boaz Rafaeli, pro se.

Benjamin Lipman, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Boaz Rafaeli appeals from his conviction by a court of trespass in violation of a City of Kirkwood municipal ordinance. A fine was imposed in the amount of two hundred dollars ($200.00).

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 70 (Wednesday, April 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18610-18611]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8916]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service


Sudbury, Assabet and Concord Rivers Wild and Scenic Study 
Massachusetts; Sudbury, Assabet and Concord Rivers Study Committee; 
Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-63, 86 Stat. 770, 5 U.S.C. App. l Section 
10), that there will be a meeting of the Sudbury, Assabet and Concord 
Rivers Study Committee on Thursday, May 18, 1995.
    The Committee was established pursuant to Public Law 101-628. The 
purpose of the Committee is to consult with the Secretary of the 
Interior and to advise the Secretary in conducting the study of the 
Sudbury, Assabet and Concord River segments specified in Section 5 (a) 
(110) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. The Committee shall also 
advise the Secretary concerning management alternatives, should some or 
all of the river segments studied be found eligible for inclusion in 
the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System.
    The meeting will be held at 7:30 p.m., Thursday, May 18, 1995, at 
the Great Meadows National Wildlife Refuge Headquarters Weir Hill Road, 
Sudbury Massachusetts. Driving Directions: From south, take Rte. 27 to 
Water Row in Sudbury, turn right at end on to Lincoln Rd., left on Weir 
Hill Rd., follow signs to GMNWR Headquarters. From north, take Concord 
Rd. to Lincoln Rd., turn left, follow Lincoln Rd. to Weir Hill Rd., 
turn left, follow signs to headquarters building. Or, take Rte 126 
north or south to Sherman's Bridge Rd. in Wayland, cross Sudbury River, 
turn right on Weir Hill Rd.
    The agenda is as follows:
I. Welcome and introductions, approval of minutes from 03/16/95 meeting
II. Brief questions and comments from public
III. Report on Town Meeting Votes--Town Representatives
IV. Next steps: Legislation and Study Report--Cassie
V. Issues of Local Concern
VI. Other Business

Adjournment

    Interested persons may make oral/written presentations to the 
Committee during the business meeting or file written statements. 
Further information concerning the meeting may be obtained from Cassie 
Thomas, Planner, National Park Service, 15 State Street, Boston, MA 
02109 or call (617) 223-014.

     [[Page 18611]] Dated: April 4, 1995.
Terry Savage,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 95-8916 Filed 4-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 69 (Tuesday, April 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 18439]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8819]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Departmental Offices, Debt Management Advisory Committee; Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. App. 10(a)(2), that a 
meeting will be held at the U.S. Treasury Department, 15th and 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC, on May 2 and May 3, 1995, of 
the following debt management advisory committee:

Public Securities Association, Treasury Borrowing Advisory Committee

    The agenda for the meeting provides for a technical background 
briefing by Treasury staff on May 2, followed by a charge by the 
Secretary of the Treasury or his designate that the committee discuss 
particular issues, and a working session. On May 3, the committee will 
present a written report of its recommendations.
    The background briefing by Treasury staff will be held at 11:30 
a.m. Eastern time on May 2 and will be open to the public. The 
remaining sessions on May 2 and the committee's reporting session on 
May 3 will be closed to the public, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. App. 10(d).
    This notice shall constitute my determination, pursuant to the 
authority placed in heads of departments by 5 U.S.C. App. 10(d) and 
vested in me by Treasury Department Order No. 101-05, that the closed 
portions of the meeting are concerned with information that is exempt 
from disclosure under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(A). The public interest 
requires that such meetings be closed to the public because the 
Treasury Department requires frank and full advice from representatives 
of the financial community prior to making its final decision on major 
financing operations. Historically, this advice has been offered by 
debt management advisory committees established by the several major 
segments of the financial community. When so utilized, such a committee 
is recognized to be an advisory committee under 5 U.S.C. App. 3.
    Although the Treasury's final announcement of financing plans may 
not reflect the recommendations provided in reports of the advisory 
committee, premature disclosure of the committee's deliberations and 
reports would be likely to lead to significant financial speculation in 
the securities market. Thus, these meetings fall within the exemption 
covered by 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(A).
    The Office of the Under Secretary for Domestic Finance is 
responsible for maintaining records of debt management advisory 
committee meetings and for providing annual reports setting forth a 
summary of committee activities and such other matters as may be 
informative to the public consistent with the policy of 5 U.S.C. 552b.

    Dated: April 4, 1995.
Frank N. Newman,
Deputy Secretary of the Treasury.
[FR Doc. 95-8819 Filed 4-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-25-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7101

United Scope LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_05.09.19.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel