alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report ofBulldog Financial, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended February 28, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Scott McDowell, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated this 12th day of May, 2006.



| | SCOTT MCDOWELL                                     
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Scott McDowell                                     
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer















---
**Exhibit 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

The Board of Directors andShareholdersMothers Work, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theregistration statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-59309, 333-90108,333-12321, 333-27611 and 333-90110) and registration statements on Form S-8(File Nos. 33-64580, 33-89726, 333-2404, 333-3480, 333-59529, 333-57766and 333-112158) of Mothers Work, Inc. of our reports dated December 13,2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Mothers Work, Inc.and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2005 and 2004, and the relatedconsolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows foreach of the years in the three-year period ended September 30, 2005 andthe related financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of September 30,2005 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of September 30,2005, which reports appear in the September 30, 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-Kof Mothers Work, Inc.
| /s/ KPMG LLP                |
|-----------------------------|
| Philadelphia,  Pennsylvania |
| December 13, 2005      |

 

----
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7077

United Scope LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_05.09.19.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

April 12, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6120

Alter Trading Corporation: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_04.15.19.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-7782

ECM Industries LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Accentia Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) for the three months ended December 31, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Alan M. Pearce, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended: and



(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: February 14, 2006



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Alan M. Pearce     
|Alan M. Pearce         
|Chief Financial Officer



This certification accompanies the
Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Accentia Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.



36
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1324

In Re: GERMAN MILLON,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (3:08-cv-00338-RJC)

Submitted: October 29, 2009 Decided: November 6, 2009

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

German Millon, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

German Millon petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (West Supp. 2009) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of

the docket sheet reveals that the district court dismissed Millon’s motion in an order entered on October 7, 2009. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Millon’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
---

---

Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report
of Magal Security System Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F/A for the period ending
December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Raya Asher, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the           Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/Raya Asher*
Raya Asher
Chief Financial Officer

January 22, 2008

*     The originally executed copy of
this Certification will be maintained at the Companys offices and will be made
available for inspection upon request.



---

---
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 73 (Monday, April 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 19236]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9304]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Meeting of the Defense Environmental Response Task Force

AGENCY: Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Environmental 
Security).

ACTION: Notice of business meeting and hearing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of a 
business meeting and hearing of the Defense Environmental Response Task 
Force (DERTF). The DERTF is charged with studying and providing 
findings and recommendations on environmental response actions at 
military installations being closed or realigned. The purpose of the 
meeting is to follow up on the January 17-19, 1995, meeting. The DERTF 
will also discuss issues related to Superfund reform, unexploded 
ordnance, and the fast track cleanup program. The business meeting and 
hearing will be open to the public. Public witnesses desiring to speak 
before the DERTF should contract Shah Choudhury, Executive Secretary, 
and prepare a written statement that can be summarized orally before 
the DERTF at the time to be fixed for public witnesses. Written 
statements must be received by the close of business, May 5, 1995, at 
the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Environmental Security).

DATES: May 23, 1995, 8:00 a.m.-4:30 p.m.; May 24, 1995, 9:45 a.m.-9:00 
p.m.

PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD IS: May 24, 1995, 7:00 p.m.-8:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: 295 North E Street, San Bernardino, CA.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Shah Choudhury, Executive Secretary, Office of the Deputy Under 
Secretary of Defense (Environmental Security), 3400 Defense Pentagon, 
Washington, DC 20301-3400; telephone (703) 697-7475.

    Dated: April 10, 1995.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 95-9304 Filed 4-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 68 (Monday, April 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 18101]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8737]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-5187-4]


Report on the Technical Review Workshop on the Reference Dose for 
Aroclor 1016

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of a report titled 
Technical Review Workshop on the Reference Dose for Aroclor 1016 (EPA/
630/R-94/006). This report compiles discussions from a technical review 
workshop on the reference dose for Aroclor 1016, which was held in 
Washington, DC, on May 24-25, 1994.

ADDRESSES: To obtain a single copy of the report, interested parties 
should contact the ORD Publications Office, CERI, U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency, 26 West Martin Luther King Drive, Cincinnati, OH 
45268, Tel: (513) 569-7562, Fax: (513) 569-7566. Please provide your 
name and mailing address, and request the document by the title and EPA 
number (EPA/630/R-94/006).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Clare Stine, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (8101), 401 M Street, 
SW., Washington, DC 20460, Telephone: (202) 260-6743.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This report includes information and 
materials from a technical review workshop organized by the U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency's Risk Assessment Forum for the 
Agency's Reference Dose/Reference Concentration (RfD/RfC) Work Group. 
The meeting was held in Washington, DC, at the Barcelo Washington Hotel 
on May 24-25, 1994 (59 FR 23202).

    EPA convened a balanced panel of experts from the fields of 
qualitative and quantitative effects of PCBs in humans and animals, 
perinatal toxicity, neurobehavioral effects, and hazard and risk 
evaluation for data on health effects other than cancer. EPA sought 
comments from these experts on the IRIS entry and related scientific 
sources. Reviewers at the workshop were asked to evaluate whether the 
reference dose fully considered available data and if scientifically 
responsible data analyses were clearly articulated in the IRIS data 
base entry. Reviewers approved some features of the IRIS entry, and 
recommended additional review and analysis for others.
    This report collects workshop papers, including summary statements 
prepared by the chairperson for each workshop topic. Workshop 
participants contributed useful recommendations for the Agency's 
Reference Dose/Reference Concentration Work Group to consider in re-
evaluating the RfD entry on IRIS.

    Dated: March 24, 1995.
Robert J. Huggett,
Assistant Administrator for Research and Development.
[FR Doc. 95-8737 Filed 4-7-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7278

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JACQUELYN M. KUBINSKI, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Fayetteville. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CR-93-28-5, CA-97-944-5-H) Submitted: January 5, 1999 Decided: February 10, 1999 Before WILKINS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jacquelyn M. Kubinski, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying her motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate ofappealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Kubinski , No. CR-93-28-5; CA-97-944-5-H (E.D.N.C. Aug. 6, 1998). Appellant’s motion for the appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
CERTIFICATIONS



I, Patrick Deparini, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Nascent Wine Company, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)

presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and



6.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date:  September
21, 2005

/s/ Patrick Deparini

President
#### Louis Fusco, Jr., Appellant, v Park 900 Condominium, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, New *243York County (William Davis, J.), entered on or about August 18, 1989, which, *inter alia,*denied plaintiff’s cross motion for partial summary judgment, without prejudice to renewal upon completion of discovery, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff, Louis Fusco, Jr., entered into an agreement with defendant Park 900 Condominium (Park 900) for the assignment of Park 900’s option to acquire a condominium unit through the exercise of its right of first refusal. In the event that plaintiff’s lending institution failed to close on its mortgage loan to plaintiff in connection with plaintiff’s purchase of the unit "for any reason not due to Buyer [plaintiff]”, the funds (previously) advanced by plaintiff were to be treated as a loan payable either 33 days after plaintiff’s failure to complete the agreement or the date Park 900 acquired title to the unit, whichever occurred first. The parties appeared at closing, but plaintiff never acquired title.

There are sharp differences as to why the transaction fell through. According to plaintiff, defendant Park 900 wrongfully refused plaintiff’s lending institution’s request for a short adjournment of closing, prompted by a report that a lis pendens had been, or was about to be, filed. Defendant Park 900, on the other hand, alleges through its agent, who was present at the closing, that plaintiff’s failure to close was solely a decision made by plaintiff for personal reasons. In view of the factual controversies surrounding this dispute, summary judgment was properly denied. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Kassal, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5476 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5476

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 4, 2024

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 1077 River Road, Suite 1, in Washington Crossing, Pennsylvania, as 
                 the ``Susan C. Barnhart Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSAN C. BARNHART POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1077 River Road, Suite 1, in Washington Crossing, 
Pennsylvania, shall be known and designated as the ``Susan C. Barnhart 
Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Susan C. 
Barnhart Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 3, 2024.

            Attest:

                                             KEVIN F. MCCUMBER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```