Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 71 / Thursday, April 13, 1995 / Rules and Regulations 18777

estimated after installation, shakedown, and/

or optimization of all low NOX burner

technology controls have been completed

and while the unit is complying with the

applicable emission limitation (or alternative

emission limitation). Continuous emission

monitoring data submitted pursuant to part

75 of this chapter will be used for the 120

days immediately following installation and

testing of the final low NOX burner

technology, provided the unit is complying

with the applicable emission limitation (or

alternative emission limitation), or another

continuous 120-day or shorter period as

approved by the Administrator. Continuous

emission monitoring data will be

extrapolated to one year of unit operation.

3.1.3 The NOX emission reduction (in lb/

mmBtu, annual average basis) achieved by

the installed low NOX burner technology will

be estimated by subtracting the controlled

NOX emission rate defined in section 3.1.2

from the uncontrolled NOX emission rate

defined in section 3.1.1.

3.1.4 Annual estimates of the NOX

emission reduction achieved by the installed

low NOX burner technology will be

converted to annual tons of NOX removed by

multiplying it by the annual heat input (in

mmBtu). Unit heat input data submitted

pursuant to part 75 of this chapter for

calendar year 1994 or for the year

immediately following installation and

testing of the final low NOX burner

technology, will be used when such data are

available prior to October 30, 1995. Such data

will be adjusted to an annual basis whenever

a nonrecurrent extended outage at the

affected unit during the period has taken

place.

3.2 The boiler-specific capital costs of

installed low NOX burner technology

developed in section 2.1 will be annualized

by multiplying them by a constant dollar

capital recovery factor based on a 20-year

economic life (e.g., 0.115).

3.3 Using cost data submitted pursuant to

the reporting requirements in section 4,

boiler-specific annual operating and

maintenance cost increases (or decreases)

will be determined for each unit in the

population specified in section 1 above. The

scope of the operating and maintenance costs

(or savings) attributable to the installed low

NOX burner technology may, but not

necessarily will, include incremental

increases (or decreases) in: maintenance

labor and materials costs, operating labor

costs, operating fuel costs, and secondary air

fan electricity costs.

3.4 The average annual cost-effectiveness

of installed low NOX burner technology

applied to Group 1, Phase I boilers will be

estimated as follows: (1) The annualized

capital costs defined in section 3.2 and the

annual operating and maintenance cost

increases (or decreases) defined in section 3.3

will be summed for all units in the

population specified in section 1; and (2)

these annualized costs will be divided by the

sum of the NOX emission reductions (in tons/

year) achieved by the units in the population

specified in section 1.

4. Reporting Requirements

4.1 The following information is to be

submitted by each designated representative

of a Phase I affected unit subject to the

reporting requirements of § 76.14(c):

4.1.1 Schedule and dates for baseline

testing, installation, and performance testing

of low NOX burner technology.

4.1.2 Estimates of the annual average

baseline NOX emission rate, as specified in

section 3.1.1, and the annual average

controlled NOX emission rate, as specified in

section 3.1.2, including the supporting

continuous emission monitoring or other test

data.

4.1.3 Copies of pre-retrofit and postretrofit performance test reports.

4.1.4 Detailed estimates of the capital

costs based on actual contract bids for each

component of the installed low NOX burner

technology including the items listed in

section 2.1. Indicate number of bids solicited.

Provide a copy of the actual agreement for

the installed technology.

4.1.5 Detailed estimates of the capital

costs of system replacements or upgrades

such as coal pipe changes, fan replacements/

upgrades, or mill replacements/upgrades

undertaken as part of the low NOX burner

technology retrofit project.

4.1.6 Detailed breakdown of the actual

costs of the completed low NOX burner

technology retrofit project where low NOX

burner technology costs (section 4.1.4) are

disaggregated, if feasible, from system

replacement or upgrade costs (section 4.1.5).

4.1.7 Description of the probable causes

for significant differences between actual and

estimated low NOX burner technology retrofit

project costs.

4.1.8 Detailed breakdown of the burner

and, if applicable, combustion air staging

system annual operating and maintenance

costs for the items listed in section 3.3 before

and after the installation, shakedown, and/or

optimization of the installed low NOX burner

technology. Include estimates and a

description of the probable causes of the

incremental annual operating and

maintenance costs (or savings) attributable to

the installed low NOX burner technology.

4.2 All capital cost estimates are to be

broken down into materials costs,

construction and installation labor costs, and

engineering and overhead costs. All

operating and maintenance costs are to be

broken down into maintenance materials

costs, maintenance labor costs, operating

labor costs, and fan electricity costs. All

capital and operating costs are to be reported

in dollars with the year of expenditure or

estimate specified for each component.

[FR Doc. 95–8742 Filed 4–12–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

43 CFR Public Land Order 7132

[AZ–930–1430–01; AR 06449]

Revocation of Public Land Order No.

1076; Arizona

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management,

Interior.

ACTION: Public Land Order.

SUMMARY: This order revokes a public

land order which withdrew 240 acres of

public land for use by the National Park

Service in connection with the

administration and maintenance of the

Wupatki National Monument. The land

was added to the Wupatki National

Monument by Public Law 87–136, and

the revocation is needed to clarify the

records and give the National Park

Service total jurisdiction. The land has

been and will remain closed to surface

entry and mining. This is a record

clearing action only.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 13, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John

Mezes, BLM Arizona State Office, P.O.

Box 16563, Phoenix, Arizona 85011,

602–650–0509.

By virtue of the authority vested in

the Secretary of the Interior by Section

204 of the Federal Land Policy and

Management Act of 1976, 43 U.S.C.

1714 (1988), it is ordered as follows:

1. Public Land Order No. 1076, which

withdrew the following described

public land, is hereby revoked in its

entirety:

Gila and Salt River Meridian

T. 25 N., R. 8 E.,

Sec. 3, W1⁄2, that part lying west of the west

right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 89

(consisting of lot 4, SW1⁄4NW1⁄4,

NW1⁄4SW1⁄4, part of the westerly portions

of lot 3, SE1⁄4NW1⁄4, and E1⁄2SW1⁄4)

The area described contains 240 acres in

Coconino County.

2. The land is located within the

Wupatki National Monument and will

remain closed to surface entry and

mining.

Dated: April 4, 1995.

Bob Armstrong,

Assistant Secretary of the Interior.

[FR Doc. 95–9098 Filed 4–12–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–32–P

43 CFR Public Land Order 7133

[OR–943–1430–01; GP5–038; OR–

50706(WA)]

Withdrawal of National Forest System

Lands for Five Seed Orchards;

Washington

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management,

Interior.

ACTION: Public land order.

SUMMARY: This order withdraws 496.22

acres of National Forest System lands in

the Colville and Kaniksu National

Forests from mining for a period of 20

years for the Department of Agriculture,

Forest Service, to protect the Brown
18778 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 71 / Thursday, April 13, 1995 / Rules and Regulations

Mountain Seed Orchard, Pal Moore

Meadows Seed Orchard, Teepee Seed

Orchard, Cedar Creek Seed Orchard,

and Flowery Trail Seed Orchard. The

lands have been and will remain open

to such forms of disposition as may by

law be made of National Forest System

lands and to mineral leasing.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 13, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Linda Sullivan, BLM Oregon/

Washington State Office, P.O. Box 2965,

Portland, Oregon 97208–2965, 503–280–

7171.

By virtue of the authority vested in

the Secretary of the Interior by Section

204 of the Federal Land Policy and

Management Act of 1976, 43 U.S.C.

1714 (1988), it is ordered as follows:

1. Subject to valid existing rights, the

following described National Forest

System lands are hereby withdrawn

from location and entry under the

United States mining laws (30 U.S.C.

Ch. 2 (1988)), but not from leasing under

the mineral leasing laws, to protect the

investment in five Forest Service seed

orchards:

Willamette Meridian

Colville National Forest

Brown Mountain Seed Orchard

T. 35 N., R. 33 E.,

Sec. 16, NW1⁄4NW1⁄4 and N1⁄2SW1⁄4NW1⁄4;

Sec. 17, E1⁄2E1⁄2NE1⁄4NE1⁄4 and

E1⁄2NE1⁄4SE1⁄4NE1⁄4.

Pal Moore Meadows Seed Orchard

T. 33 N., R. 41 E.,

Sec. 1, W1⁄2E1⁄2 and W1⁄2 of lot 4 and

W1⁄2SW1⁄4NW1⁄4;

Sec. 2, S1⁄2S1⁄2 of lot 1, S1⁄2SE1⁄4 of lot 2,

and S1⁄2NE1⁄4.

Teepee Seed Orchard

T. 37 N., R. 42 E.,

Sec. 34, S1⁄2SE1⁄4NW1⁄4NE1⁄4,

E1⁄2SW1⁄4NE1⁄4, W1⁄2SE1⁄4NE1⁄4,

N1⁄2NW1⁄4NE1⁄4SE1⁄4, and

N1⁄2NE1⁄4NW1⁄4SE1⁄4.

Cedar Creek Seed Orchard

T. 40 N., R. 42 E.,

Sec. 10, SE1⁄4NE1⁄4SW1⁄4, W1⁄2E1⁄2SW1⁄4,

W1⁄2SW1⁄4, and NE1⁄4SE1⁄4SW1⁄4.

Kaniksu National Forest

Flowery Trail Seed Orchard

T. 32 N., R. 43 E.,

Sec. 5, S1⁄2NE1⁄4SW1⁄4, E1⁄2SW1⁄4SW1⁄4, and

SE1⁄4SW1⁄4.

The areas described aggregate 496.22 acres

in Ferry, Stevens, and Pend Oreille Counties.

2. The withdrawal made by this order

does not alter the applicability of those

public land laws governing the use of

the National Forest System lands under

lease, license, or permit, or governing

the disposal of their mineral or

vegetative resources other than under

the mining laws.

3. This withdrawal will expire 20

years from the effective date of this

order unless, as a result of a review

conducted before the expiration date

pursuant to Section 204(f) of the Federal

Land Policy and Management Act of

1976, 43 U.S.C. 1714(f) (1988), the

Secretary determines that the

withdrawal shall be extended.

Dated: April 4, 1995.

Bob Armstrong,

Assistant Secretary of the Interior.

[FR Doc. 95–9099 Filed 4–12–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–33–P

43 CFR Public Land Order 7137

[CO–930–1920–00–4357; COC–52206]

Transfer of Public Land for the Maybell

Disposal Site; Colorado

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management,

Interior.

ACTION: Public land order.

SUMMARY: This order permanently

transfers 140.49 acres of public land to

the Department of Energy in accordance

with the terms of the Uranium Mill

Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978

(42 U.S.C. 7916 (1988)), as amended.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 13, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Doris E. Chelius, BLM Colorado State

Office, 2850 Youngfield Street,

Lakewood, Colorado 80215–7076, 303–

239–3706.

By virtue of the authority vested in

the Secretary of the Interior by the

Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation

Control Act of 1978 (42 U.S.C. 7916

(1988)), as amended, it is ordered as

follows:

1. Subject to valid existing rights, the

following described public land is

hereby permanently transferred to the

Department of Energy, and as a result of

this transfer, the land is no longer

subject to the operation of the general

land laws, including the mining and the

mineral leasing laws, for the Maybell

Disposal Site:

Sixth Principal Meridian

T. 7 N., R. 94 W.,

Sec. 19, lots 10, 12, 14, and 16,

W1⁄2E1⁄2SW1⁄4NE1⁄4,

W1⁄2E1⁄2NE1⁄4SW1⁄4NE1⁄4,

W1⁄2SW1⁄4NE1⁄4, SE1⁄4NW1⁄4,

W1⁄2W1⁄2NE1⁄4NW1⁄4SE1⁄4, and

W1⁄2NW1⁄4SE1⁄4.

The area described contains 140.49 acres of

public land in Moffat County.

2. The transfer of the above-described

land to the Department of Energy vests

in that Department full management,

jurisdiction, responsibility, and liability

for such land and all activities

conducted therein, except as provided

in paragraph 3.

3. The Secretary of the Interior shall

retain the authority to administer any

existing claims, rights, and interests in

this land established before the effective

date of the transfer.

Dated: April 7, 1995.

Bob Armstrong,

Assistant Secretary of the Interior.

[FR Doc. 95–9048 Filed 4–12–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–JB–P

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 2

[ET Docket No. 92–28; FCC 95–71]

Mobile-Satellite Service at 1610–1626.5

and 2483.5–2500 MHz

AGENCY: Federal Communications

Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: This Second Report and

Order denies five pioneer’s preference

requests submitted by Constellation

Communications, Inc. (Constellation),

Ellipsat Corporation (Ellipsat), Loral

Qualcomm Satellite Services, Inc.

(LQSS), Motorola Satellite

Communications, Inc. (Motorola), and

TRW Inc. (TRW). These parties

requested a pioneer’s preference for

their proposals with regard to nongeostationary (low-Earth orbit, or LEO)

mobile-satellite service (MSS) systems.

In denying the requests, the

Commission has determined that none

of these LEO MSS proponents pioneered

an innovative new service or

technology.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 15, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ray

LaForge, Office of Engineering and

Technology, telephone (202) 739–0598.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a

summary of the Commission’s

Memorandum Opinion and Order in ET

Docket No. 92–28, adopted February 24,

1995 and released March 30, 1995. The

complete text of this Memorandum

Opinion and Order is available for

inspection and copying during normal

business hours in the FCC Public

Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M

Street, NW, Washington, DC. The

complete text of this Memorandum

Opinion and Order also may be

purchased from the Commission’s

duplication contractor, International

Transcription Service, Inc., 2100 M

Street, NW, Suite 140, Washington, DC

20036, (202) 857–3800.