alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of

ROBERT C. LITWACK

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT

FROM INACTIVE STATUS

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 167 DB 2017 (No. 99 RST 2017)

Attorney Registration No. 38280

(Out of State)

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of December, 2017, the Report and Recommendation 

of Disciplinary Board Member dated December 14, 2017, is approved and it is 

ORDERED that Robert C. Litwack, who has been on Inactive Status, has never been 

suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications, 

competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the 

Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the

Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation 

and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner.
#### Jacqueline JUMONVILLE, Respondent, v. TRANS WORLD AIRLINES, INC., Appellant. Jacqueline JUMONVILLE, Appellant, v. TRANS WORLD AIRLINES, INC., Respondent.

Nos. 67011, 67122.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

May 9, 1995.

Dewey L. Crepeau, Columbia, for Jumon-ville.

Paul D. Larimore, St. Louis, for Trans World Airlines, Inc.

Before SMITH, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and WHITE, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal involves two separate worker’s compensation claims. Claimant appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s finding an injury she sustained on October 23, 1988 was not within the course and scope of her employment. Employer appeals from the Commission’s award of benefits for an injury claimant sustained on May 20, 1990. We affirm.

We have reviewed the records and the briefs of the parties and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgments of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission are supported by competent and substantial evidence. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value.

*241The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1589

RENITA STULTZ,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

KAREN W. PONDER, as an individual and in her

official capacity as Executive Director of The

North Carolina Partnership for Children, Inc.;

THE NORTH CAROLINA PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN,

INC., a North Carolina not-for-profit

corporation; SUSAN V. RUTH, as an individual

and in her official capacity as Program and

Planning Director of the North Carolina

Partnership for Children, Inc.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,

District Judge. (5:03-cv-00646-BO)

Submitted: February 7, 2007 Decided: February 28, 2007

Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Janet J. Lennon, LAW OFFICE OF JANET J. LENNON, Durham, North

Carolina, for Appellant. Patricia T. Bartis, PARKER, POE, ADAMS &

BERNSTEIN, L.L.P., Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
- 2 -

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Renita Stultz appeals the district court’s order granting

Karen Ponder, Susan Ruth, and The North Carolina Partnership for

Children, Inc., summary judgment on the civil action she brought

against them. On appeal, Stultz argues that the district court

erred in finding that she did not raise a genuine issue of material

fact to establish that the Defendants’ proffered nondiscriminatory

reasons for her termination were pretextual. She also alleges that

the district court erred in denying her motion for a continuance of

the summary judgment hearing. We have reviewed the briefs and the

joint appendix and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stultz v.

Ponder, No. 5:03-cv-00646-BO (E.D.N.C. Mar. 30, 2006). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I,
Martin Tuchman, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Interpool, Inc. (the
"Company"), pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby
certify as follows:

|(1) | The report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 as
amended by Amendment No. 2 on Form 10-K/A fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Certification this 8th
day of November, 2005.

| | /s/ Martin Tuchman
     Martin Tuchman
     Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive
     Officer, President,
     Chief Operating Officer and Director
     (Principal Executive Officer)
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Interpool, Inc. and will be
retained by Interpool, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 23.2

               Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8  No.   33-97772)   pertaining  to  the  1994  Incentive   Stock  Option  and
Non-Qualified  Stock  Option  Plan  of  InfoMed  Holdings,   Inc.;  Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No.  333-51869)  pertaining to the Simione Central Holdings,
Inc.  1997  Non-Qualified   Formula  Stock  Option  Plan,  Omnibus  Equity-Based
Incentive Plan, and the 1996 Stock Option Plan; and Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No.  333-70811)  pertaining to the Simione Central  Holdings,  Inc.  Omnibus
Equity-Based  Incentive Plan of our report dated February 23, 1998, with respect
to the financial  statements and schedule of Simione Central Holdings,  Inc. for
the year ended December 31, 1997,  included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended December 31, 1999.


                                             /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
April 13, 2000
**EXHIBIT 32.01**

** **

**Section 1350 Certification**

** **

**In connection with this quarterlyreport of ML Winton FuturesAccess LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I, Paul Morton, Chief ExecutiveOfficer, President and Manager of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:**

** **

1. This Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in this Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: May 15, 2009                         |             |   |
|-------------------------------------------------|------------------|--------|
|                                            |             |   |
| By                                              | /s/  PAUL MORTON |   |   |
| Paul  Morton                                    |             |   |
| Chief  Executive Officer, President and Manager |             |   |
| (Principal  Executive Officer)                  |             |   |
|                                                 |                  |        |  |

 

----
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7542

A.W. Chesterton Company:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Johnnie RICKS, Defendant/Appellant. Johnnie RICKS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

Nos. 63372, 66088.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.

March 21, 1995.

*312Deborah B. Wafer, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Mary Moulton Bryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before GRIMM, C.J., and REINHARD and CRANE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

A jury found defendant guilty of resisting arrest, in violation of § 575.150, RSMo 1994. The trial court sentenced defendant as a prior and persistent offender to four years.

On direct appeal, defendant claims that the evidence was insufficient to demonstrate that he knew the police officers were making an arrest or that he acted with the purpose of preventing them from making the arrest. In addition, he claims error in overruling an objection concerning a statement a police officer heard him make. The evidence was sufficient and we find no error in overruling the objection.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgment and sentence are affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25.

Defendant filed a motion and an amended motion to vacate under Rule 29.15. The motion court scheduled an evidentiary hearing, however defendant failed to appear. Thereafter, the motion court entered findings, conclusions, and judgment denying defendant relief.

Although defendant appealed this denial, his brief does not contain any points relating thereto. Therefore, this appeal is deemed abandoned and the motion court’s judgment is affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5524 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5524

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the start date of the pilot program on sharing with foreign 
                 branches, subsidiaries and affiliates.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Foreign Affiliates Sharing Pilot 
Program Extension Act''.

SEC. 2. FOREIGN AFFILIATES SHARING PILOT PROGRAM.

    Section 5318(g)(8)(B)(iii) of title 31, United States Code, is 
amended by striking ``3 years after the date of enactment of this 
paragraph'' and inserting ``3 years after the date on which the 
Secretary of the Treasury issues rules pursuant to subparagraph (A)''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 12, 2023.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
118th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 5524

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend the start date of the pilot program on sharing with foreign 
                 branches, subsidiaries and affiliates.
```
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.3



Interpool, Inc. Contact:                    Raoul J. Witteveen, President
                                            (212) 916-3261

Atlas Capital Partners LLC Contact:         Mitchell I. Gordon, President
                                            (212) 916-3284

NEWS FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE


               INTERPOOL, INC. ANNOUNCES CONSENSUAL TERMINATION OF
                            MERGER AGREEMENT BETWEEN
                      XTRA CORPORATION AND WHEELS MERGERCO
                           PARTIES CONTINUE DISCUSSION


NEW YORK, NY, November 27, 1998 -- Interpool, Inc. (NYSE: IPX) announced today
that Wheels MergerCo LLC, a company formed by Apollo Management IV, L.P.
("Apollo") and Interpool (through its affiliate Atlas Capital Partners), and
XTRA Corporation ("XTRA") have mutually agreed to terminate their existing
merger agreement. Interpool, Apollo and XTRA are discussing the possibility of
an alternative transaction; however, no agreement has been reached on the terms
of any transaction and no assurances can be given that any agreement will be
reached.

Interpool is one of the world's largest lessors of cargo containers used in
international trade and is the second largest lessor of intermodal container
chassis in the United States. Founded in 1968, Interpool leases its containers
and chassis to over 200 customers on a worldwide basis. Earlier this year,
Interpool acquired a 50% interest in Container Applications International, Inc.
("CAI"). CAI is one of the world's leading managers of container assets.


                                      # # #
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 105 (Thursday, June 3, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 29770]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-11708]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

    Docket Numbers: RP21-686-001.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing Compliance Filing--Crediting of 
Storage Reservation Charges to be effective 5/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 5/26/21.
    Accession Number: 20210526-5164.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/7/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-843-000.
    Applicants: Texas Eastern Transmission, LP.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: ROFR Agreement Definition 
Modification to be effective 6/25/2021.
    Filed Date: 5/26/21.
    Accession Number: 20210526-5206.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/7/21.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: May 27, 2021.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-11708 Filed 6-2-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. William BREEDING, Appellant.

No. 64721.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

March 21, 1995.

Deborah B. Wafer, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Becky Owenson Kilpatrick, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before AHRENS, P.J., and SIMON and KAROHL, JJ.

*307
      *ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals judgment entered on a guilty jury verdict on the charge of sodomy in violation of § 566.060 RSMo 1986. Defendant was sentenced in accord with the verdict of the jury to serve seven years imprisonment. We find and hold that two preserved claims of error regarding admission of evidence over defendant’s objection were non-prejudicial errors. We also find and hold that one claim of plain error is without merit. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).
Eighth Amendment to Credit Agreement



 Exhibit 10.51 

EIGHTH AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT 

THIS AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of March 16, 2010, by and between NATURAL
ALTERNATIVES INTERNATIONAL, INC. a Delaware corporation (“Borrower”), and WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION (“Bank”). 

RECITALS 

WHEREAS, Borrower is currently indebted to Bank pursuant to the terms and conditions of that certain Credit Agreement between Borrower and
Bank dated as of May 1, 2004, as amended from time to time (“Credit Agreement”). 
 WHEREAS, Bank and Borrower
have agreed to certain changes in the terms and conditions set forth in the Credit Agreement and have agreed to amend the Credit Agreement to reflect said changes. 

NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree that
the Credit Agreement shall be amended as follows: 
 1. Section 1.1 (a) is hereby amended by deleting “November
1, 2010” as the last day on which Bank will make advances under the Line of Credit, and by substituting for said date “November 1, 2011,” with such change to be effective upon the execution and delivery to Bank of a promissory note
dated as of March 16, 2010 (which promissory note shall replace and be deemed the Line of Credit Note defined in and made pursuant to the Credit Agreement) and all other contracts, instruments and documents required by Bank to evidence such
change. 
 2. Except as specifically provided herein, all terms and conditions of the Credit Agreement remain in full force and
effect, without waiver or modification. All terms defined in the Credit Agreement shall have the same meaning when used in this Amendment. This Amendment and the Credit Agreement shall be read together, as one document. 

3. Borrower hereby remakes all representations and warranties contained in the Credit Agreement and reaffirms all covenants set forth
therein. Borrower further certifies that as of the date of this Amendment there exists no Event of Default as defined in the Credit Agreement, nor any condition, act or event which with the giving of notice or the passage of time or both would
constitute any such Event of Default. 
  

 1 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the
day and year first written above. 
  

									
	 NATURAL ALTERNATIVES

INTERNATIONAL, INC.
	 		 	 WELLS FARGO BANK,

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

					
	By:	 	/S/ MARK A. LEDOUX	 		 	By:	 	/S/ BERNIE PALMER
		 	 Mark A. LeDoux
 Chairman, Chief
Executive Officer
	 		 		 	 Bernie Palmer
 Vice
President


  

									
					
	By:	 	/S/ KENNETH E. WOLF	 		 		 	
		 	 Kenneth E. Wolf
 Chief
Financial Officer, Secretary
	 		 		 	

  

 2
<PAGE>
                                                               EXHIBIT 23.1




INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
33-66790 and 33-66844 of Gibraltar Packaging Group, Inc. on Form S-8 of our
report dated August 5, 1996 (September 25, 1996 with respect to Note 4),
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Gibraltar Packaging Group, Inc.
for the year ended June 29, 1996.



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Charlotte, North Carolina

October 8, 1996

<PAGE>
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, PRESIDENT **

**AND      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER **

**PURSUANT      TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

**(18      U.S.C. 1350) **

| (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                    |                                 |                                               |
|-------------------------|--------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                    |                                 |
| Date: 5/9/06  | By:                        | /s/ Vance              R.              Martin |
|                    | Vance              R. Martin         |
|                    | Chief              Executive Officer |
|                    | (through April 15, 2006)             |

|                    |                         |                                               |
|-------------------------|------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                    |                         |
| Date: 5/9/06  | By:                | /s/ W.              Derek              Martin |
|                    | W.              Derek Martin |
|                    | President                    |
|                    |                         |

|                    |                                 |                                                  |
|-------------------------|--------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                    |                                 |
| Date: 5/9/06  | By:                        | /s/ Steven              P.              Morrison |
|                    | Steven              P. Morrison      |
|                    | Chief              Financial Officer |