alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant
to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Robert
K. Eulau, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Sanmina-SCI
Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge:




1.
            The
      Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
      October 3, 2009, to which this Certification is attached as
      Exhibit 32.2 (the “Periodic Report”), fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange
      Act; and




2.
            The
      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
undersigned has set his hand hereto as of December 1, 2009.




/s/
      Robert K.
      EulauRobert
      K. EulauExecutive
      Vice President andChief
      Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer)


This
certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated
by reference into any filing of Sanmina-SCI Corporation under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether
made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any
general incorporation language contained in such filing.
**EXHIBIT 32.02**

 

**Section 1350Certification**

 

In connection with this quarterly report of ML Winton FuturesAccess LLC(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I,Barbra E. Kocsis, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

1.This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Date: August 13, 2010

 

 
| By                                            | /s/  BARBRA E. KOCSIS |   |
|-----------------------------------------------|-----------------------|--------|
| Barbra  E. Kocsis                             |
| Chief  Financial Officer                      |
| (Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer) |

 

----
#### Tommie Eugene HORN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 43075.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

July 31, 1990.

Tommie Eugene Horn, Moberly, pro se.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before TURNAGE, P.J., and MANFORD and BERREY, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from dismissal of Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of U.S. Helicopter Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, George J. Mehm, Jr., Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best oF my knowledge:

      1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: November 14, 2006


                                         /S/ GEORGE J. MEHM, JR.
                                         -------------------------------------
                                         George J. Mehm, Jr.
                                         Sr. Vice President and Chief
                                         Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 69 (Tuesday, April 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 18421]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8821]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service


Endangered and Threatened Species Permits

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that Region 1 of the U.S. Fish and 
Wildlife Service has issued the following permits, between October 1, 
1994 and March 31, 1995, for incidental take of threatened or 
endangered species from applications duly received according to section 
10 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). Each permit 
listed as issued was granted only after it was determined to be applied 
for in good faith, and that it was consistent with the Act and 
applicable regulations.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Issuance 
                     Name                        Permit No.      date   
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nye County....................................       776604      2/13/95
Weyerhaeuser Company..........................       796822      2/14/95
Coast Range Conifers..........................       791930      3/22/95
John Laing Properties, Inc....................       788945      3/22/95
------------------------------------------------------------------------

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chief, Division of Consultation and 
Conservation Planning, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 911 NE 11th 
Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97232-4181 (503-231-6241). Please refer to the 
permit number listed above when requesting information.

    Dated: April 5, 1995.

David L. McMullen,

Deputy Regional Director, Region 1, Portland, Oregon.

[FR Doc. 95-8821 Filed 4-10-95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Juma Technology, Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony M. Servidio,
the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Anthony M.
  ServidioAnthony
      M. Servidio
                Chief
      Executive Officer and
                Chairman





November  10,
2010
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 67 (Friday, April 7, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 17777]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8647]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Chairman's Roundtable on Past Performance Disclosure

    This is to give notice that the Chairman of the Commodity Futures 
Trading Commission will conduct a public meeting on Tuesday, April 25, 
1995 from 2:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. in the lower-level hearing room of the 
Commodity Futures Trading Commission, 2033 K Street NW., Washington, DC 
20581. The agenda will consist of:

Roundtable--Rethinking Past Performance Disclosure

A. Opening Statement--Mary L. Schapiro, Chairman
B. Presentation by CFTC Staff
    Past performance disclosure--current and proposed regulations
C. Tour De Table--Potential Issues for Discussion
     What are the purposes for requiring past performance 
disclosure?
    --information as to competence of CTA
    --information as to program
    --volatility
    --leverage
    --rate of return
    --costs
    --ability to compare CTAs, types of investments
    --other
     How is it used by:
    --customers; and,
    --CTAs?
     What are the problems with using past performance 
disclosure to evaluate CTA performance?
     What customer protection considerations are addressed or 
raised by past performance disclosure?
     How can current performance presentations be made more 
meaningful?
D. Identification of Specific Proposals for Discussion
    What are the implications of the answers to the above questions on:
    --Presentation of partially-funded (``national'') programs
    --Benchmarking performance
    --Proprietary performance
    --Hypothetical performance
    --Multimedia investments

    The purpose of the meeting is to explore performance issues with a 
diverse group of industry experts, regulators, academics and market 
users toward the goal of more meaningful performance disclosures.
    The meeting is open to the public. The Chairman of the Commodity 
Futures Trading Commission, Mary L. Schapiro, is empowered to conduct 
the meeting in a fashion that will, in her judgment, facilitate the 
orderly conduct of business.

    Issued in Washington, DC on April 4, 1995.
Andrea M. Corcoran,
Director, Division of Trading & Markets.
[FR Doc. 95-8647 Filed 4-6-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CAMBER ENERGY, INC.****Certification Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Camber Energy, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2020, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Frank W. Barker, Jr., Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                   |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                    |
|   | (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of |

 

| Date: May 17, 2022 | */s/**Frank W. Barker, Jr.*           |   |
|--------------------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|                    | Frank W. Barker, Jr.                       |   |
|               | Principal Financial and Accounting Officer |   |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         361,658
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,928,391
<ALLOWANCES>                                   125,573
<INVENTORY>                                  4,155,429
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,096,912
<PP&E>                                       3,732,863
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,179,015
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,610,434
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,031,450
<BONDS>                                        869,968
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        1,450,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        37,840
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,221,176
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,610,434
<SALES>                                     19,345,771
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            19,365,196
<CGS>                                       13,760,360
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               22,754,434
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             286,804
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,676,042)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,676,042)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,676,042)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.06)


</TABLE>
#### State of California, ex rel. Rosita M. JONES, et al., Respondent, v. Raymond MANNING, Appellant.

No. WD 47435.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Feb. 15, 1994.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 29, 1994.

Application to Transfer Denied May 26, 1994.

Richard L. Colbert, Kansas City, for appellant.

Claire C. McCaskill, Pros. Atty., Raoul C. Stitt, Cindy M. Flick, Asst. Pros. Attys., Jackson County, Kansas City, for respondent.

Before HANNA, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and FENNER, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a paternity action. The putative father asserts error in: (1) the admission of his blood test on the grounds the Uniform Parentage Act (U.P.A.) should not have applied; and, (2) the admission of evidence of the child’s birth date, which differed from that stated in the pleadings, on the grounds it did not give him an adequate opportunity to prepare his defense. The judgement establishing paternity is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-6404

Lind Jensen Machinery Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 20056 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

BRENDA ROSAS , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:17

- CR

- 485

- 3

Before KING, ELROD, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Brenda Rosas has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rosas h a s not filed a response. We hav e reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 11, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-20056 Document: 00514636322 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/11/2018No. 18

- 20056

2 appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 18-20056 Document: 00514636322 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/11/2018
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 65 (Wednesday, April 5, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 17352]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8268]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP93-206-004]


Northern Natural Gas Co., Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas 
Tariff

March 30, 1995.
    Take notice that on March 27, 1995, Northern Natural Gas Company 
(Northern), tendered for filing to become part of Northern's FERC Gas 
Tariff, Fifth Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet, 
effective March 11, 1995:

Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 263A

    Northern states that such tariff sheet is being submitted in 
compliance with the Commission's Order issued March 10, 1995, in Docket 
No. RP93-206-003, to revise the termination date of the Carlton 
Resolution to October 31, 1995.
    Northern further states that copies of the filing have been mailed 
to each of its customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol 
Street, N.E., Washington, D.C, 20426, in accordance with Rule 211 of 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211). All 
such protests must be filed on or before April 6, 1995. Protests will 
be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-8268 Filed 4-4-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6918

United Scope LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_05.09.19.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4134

Scosche Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel