alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6784

Omron Management Center of America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
ri 

T053.20 

000000000?290 C LE{ 

19 0 

+ 

*--1 1111441itieA 

MF2 

1•10 

B11053a000000000 

feiliAtkv. 

• N 

• * 

EANAt 

ANtf. 

• * 

41. 

3)- fMt 

*PK 

# N 

* 

61-tti-tiz 

1 1 

4i1 

250.5 

tit
**EXHIBIT 32.02**

**Section 1350 Certification**

**In connection with this quarterly report of ML AspectFuturesAccess LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September30, 2006 as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof(this “Report”), I, Barbra E. Kocsis, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:**

1. This Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2. The informationcontained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: November 14, 2006                      |                 |
|----------------------------------------------|----------------------|
|                                         |
| By                                           | /s/ BARBRA E. KOCSIS |   |
| Barbra E. Kocsis                             |
| Chief Financial Officer                      |
| (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|                                              |                      |  |  |

 

1

----
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5434 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5434

 To amend titles XIX and XXI of the Social Security Act to provide for 
   12-month continuous enrollment of individuals under the Medicaid 
            program and Children's Health Insurance Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 13, 2023

  Mrs. Dingell (for herself and Mr. Pallone) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend titles XIX and XXI of the Social Security Act to provide for 
   12-month continuous enrollment of individuals under the Medicaid 
            program and Children's Health Insurance Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stabilize Medicaid and CHIP Coverage 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PROVIDING FOR 12-MONTH CONTINUOUS ENROLLMENT OF INDIVIDUALS 
              UNDER THE MEDICAID PROGRAM AND CHILDREN'S HEALTH 
              INSURANCE PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Section 1902(e)(12) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1396a(e)(12)), as amended by section 5112 of the Consolidated 
Appropriations Act, 2023, is further amended--
            (1) in the header, by striking ``for children'';
            (2) by striking ``who is under the age of 19 and'';
            (3) in subparagraph (A), by adding ``or'' at the end;
            (4) by striking subparagraph (B); and
            (5) by redesignating subparagraph (C) as subparagraph (B).
    (b) CHIP.--2107(e)(1)(K) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1397gg(e)(1)(K)), as amended by section 5112 of the Consolidated 
Appropriations Act, 2023, is further amended--
            (1) by striking ``for children'';
            (2) by striking ``targeted low-income child'' and inserting 
        ``individual''; and
            (3) by striking ``child becomes'' and inserting 
        ``individual becomes''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect on the first day of the first fiscal quarter that begins on or 
after the date that is 1 year after the date of enactment of the 
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Consumer Product Safety Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

Wednesday, June 2, 2021; 9:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m.

# PLACE:

Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic, the meeting will be held remotely.

# STATUS:

Commission Meeting—Open to the Public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

 

*Decisional Matters:* Accreditation of the Laboratory of Guangsheng M&P Manufacturing Co. Ltd. Conformity Assessment Body as a “Firewalled” Third Party Laboratory and Related Delegation of Authority; and

*Final Rule:* Safety Standard for Infant Sleep Products

All attendees should register for the Webinar. To register for the Webinar, please visit *https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/​register/​1135239573826588688* and fill in the information. After registering you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the webinar.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Alberta Mills, Office of the Secretariat, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-6833 (Office) or (240) 863-8938 (Cell).

Dated: May 25, 2021.

Alberta E. Mills,

Commission Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2021-11418 Filed 5-26-21; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
a6257555ex10-3.htm


Exhibit 10.3







Amendment Dated May 5, 2010 to the Consulting Agreement


between Ford Motor Company and Edsel B. Ford II







On May 5, 2010, Ford Motor Company and Edsel B. Ford II, a director of and consultant to the Company, agreed to amend Mr. Ford's January 1999 consulting agreement to provide that, effective beginning with the third calendar quarter of 2010 and for the remainder of 2010, the payment of the consulting fee of $125,000 per calendar quarter shall be paid in cash instead of in restricted shares of Company common stock.  For each year thereafter that the consulting agreement remains in effect, the Company and Mr. Ford will agree prior to December 31 of each year whether the subsequent yearly fee will be paid in cash or restricted stock.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-85,068-01

EX PARTE VICTOR EUGENE BAILEY, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 2011CR4772-W1 IN THE 175TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM BEXAR COUNTY

Per curiam. YEARY, J., not participating.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated

robbery and sentenced to forty years’ imprisonment. The Fourth Court of Appeals affirmed his

conviction. Bailey v. State, No. 04-14-00582-CR (Tex. App. — San Antonio, February 25, 2015)

(not designated for publication).

On May 12, 2016, this Court received Applicant’s pro se application for writ of habeas

corpus pursuant to Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. On May 27, 2016, this

Court granted Applicant’s first request for an extension of time before ruling on his habeas
2

application, giving him until June 24, 2016 to submit supplemental materials. However, on June

15, 2016, nine days before the end of the extension period granted by this Court, Applicant’s

application was denied without written order. That disposition was premature. 

Because the denial of Applicant’s habeas application on June 15, 2016, was premature, this

Court issued an order on July 27, 2016, withdrawing the disposition and granting Applicant 

additional time to submit his supplemental materials. On February 1, 2017, this Court issued a

second order to clarify that any supplemental claims must be submitted on the Article 11.07 habeas

form, and that they must be filed in the trial court. 

On March 17, 2017, this Court received Applicant’s supplemental habeas claims from the

trial court, alongwith the trial court’s supplemental order containing findings of fact and conclusions

of law as to those claims. This Court has now reviewed all of the claims in Applicant’s initial

application and supplemental application, and determines that the trial court’s findings of fact,

conclusions of law, and recommendation to deny relief are supported by the record. Relief is denied

as to all of the claims raised in Applicant’s initial and supplemental habeas applications.

Filed: April 5, 2017

Do not publish
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

April 28, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130404 & (62)(63) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

MARGARET TERRY, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 130404 

 COA: 263339 

Macomb CC: 04-003222-NO 

DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 20, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motions to 

strike and for miscellaneous relief are DENIED. 

t0424 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 28, 2006 

Clerk
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7656

MARCUS DORAN BARLEY, 

 Petitioner - Appellant, 

v. 

ERIC WILSON, Warden, 

 Respondent - Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior

District Judge. (1:13-cv-01111-JCC-IDD) 

Submitted: December 19, 2013 Decided: December 24, 2013

Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Marcus Doran Barley, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2

PER CURIAM: 

Marcus Doran Barley seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order construing his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & 

Supp. 2013) petition as a 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2013) 

motion and dismissing it for failure to first obtain 

authorization from this court to file a successive § 2255 

motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Barley has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in 
3

forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5831

Magna Electronics: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_05.09.19.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7002

CRRC MA Corporation:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because granting the request would undermine the objective of the Section 

301 investigation.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 74 (Tuesday, April 18, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 19402]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9477]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Farmers State Holding Corp., et al.; Formations of; Acquisitions 
by; and Mergers of Bank Holding Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied for the Board's 
approval under section 3 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 
1842) and Sec.  225.14 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.14) to 
become a bank holding company or to acquire a bank or bank holding 
company. The factors that are considered in acting on the applications 
are set forth in section 3(c) of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Each application is available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. Once the application has been accepted 
for processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing to the Reserve Bank or to the offices of the Board of 
Governors. Any comment on an application that requests a hearing must 
include a statement of why a written presentation would not suffice in 
lieu of a hearing, identifying specifically any questions of fact that 
are in dispute and summarizing the evidence that would be presented at 
a hearing.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received not later than May 12, 1995.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Randall C. Sumner, Vice 
President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166:
    1. Farmers State Holding Corp., Alto Pass, Illinois; to become a 
bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of 
Farmers State Bank of Alto Pass, Illinois, Alto Pass, Illinois.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (John E. Yorke, Senior Vice 
President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64198:
    1. Craco, Inc., Vinita, Oklahoma; to acquire 100 percent of the 
voting shares of The First National Bank of Grove, Grove, Oklahoma (in 
organization).
    C. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Kenneth R. Binning, 
Director, Bank Holding Company) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, 
California 94105:
    1. Barnes Bancorporation, Kaysville, Utah; to become a bank holding 
company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of Barnes Banking 
Company, Kaysville, Utah.
    2. Sun Capital Bancorp, St. George, Utah; to become a bank holding 
company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of Sun Capital 
Bank, St. George, Utah.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 12, 
1995.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-9477 Filed 4-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-7412

Nissan North America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6990

Regal Beloit America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

“Made in China 2025” or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel