Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 68 / Monday, April 10, 1995 / Notices 18147

contribute importantly to worker

separations at the subject firm.

Affirmative Determinations NAFTA–

TAA

NAFTA–TAA–00372; Thomas & Betts

Co., Elizabeth, NJ

A certification was issued covering all

workers of Thomas & Betts Co.,

Elizabeth, NJ separated on or after

February 17, 1994.

NAFTA–TAA–00371; Fisher-Price/

Mattel, Inc., Medina, NY

A certification was issued covering all

workers at Fisher-Price/Mattel, Inc.,

Medina, NY separated on or after

February 10, 1994.

NAFTA–TAA–00368; Essilor of

America, St. Petersburg, FL;

A certification was issued covering all

workers at Essilor of America, St.

Petersburg, FL separated on or after

February 10, 1994.

NAFTA–TAA–00367; Escod Industries,

Colorado Operations, Canon City,

CO

A certification was issued covering all

workers at Escod Industries, Colorado

Operations, Canon City, CO separated

on or after February 15, 1994.

NAFTA–TAA–00366; Crown Cork &

Seal Co., Inc., Swedesboro, NJ

A certification was issued covering all

workers of Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc.,

Swedesboro, NJ separated on or after

February 10, 1994.

NAFTA–TAA–00361; Maska US, Inc.,

Bradford, VT

A certification was issued covering all

workers of Maska US, Inc., Bradford, VT

separated on or after February 6, 1994.

I hereby certify that the aforementioned

determinations were issued during the

months of March, 1995. Copies of these

determinations are available for inspection in

Room C–4318, U.S. Department of Labor, 200

Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C.

20210 during normal business hours or will

be mailed to persons who write to the above

address.

Dated: March 31, 1995.

Victor J. Trunzo,

Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment

Services, Office of Trade Adjustment

Assistance.

[FR Doc. 95–8721 Filed 4–7–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–M

Mine Safety and Health Administration

Petitions for Modification

The following parties have filed

petitions to modify the application of

mandatory safety standards under

section 101(c) of the Federal Mine

Safety and Health Act of 1977.

1. C&B Mining Company

[Docket No. M–95–39–C]

C&B Mining, R.D. #2, Box 861, Coal

Township, Pennsylvania 17866 has filed

a petition to modify the application of

30 CFR 75.335 (construction of seals) to

its No. 2 Vein Slope (I.D. No. 36–07813)

located in Northumberland County,

Pennsylvania. The petitioner requests a

modification of the standard to permit

alternative methods of seal construction

using wooden materials of moderate

size and weight due to the difficulty in

accessing previously driven headings

and breasts containing inaccessible

abandoned workings; to accept a design

criterion in the 10 psi range; and to

permit the water trap to be installed in

the gangway seal and sampling tube in

the monkey seal for seals installed in

pairs. The petitioner asserts that the

proposed alternative method would

provide at least the same measure of

protection as would the mandatory

standard.

2. C&B Mining Company

[Docket No. M–95–40–C]

C&B Mining, R.D. #2, Box 861, Coal

Township, Pennsylvania 17866 has filed

a petition to modify the application of

30 CFR 75.360 (preshift examination) to

its No. 2 Vein Slope (I.D. No. 36–07813)

located in Northumberland County,

Pennsylvania. The petitioner proposes

to examine each seal for physical

damage from the slope gunboat during

the preshift examination after an air

quantity reading is taken in by the

intake portal and to test for the quantity

and quality of air at the intake air split

locations off the slope in the gangway

portion of the working section. The

petitioner proposes to physically

examine the entire length of the slope

once a month. The petitioner asserts

that the proposed alternative method

would provide at least the same

measure of protection as would the

mandatory standard.

3. C&B Mining Company

[Docket No. M–95–41–C]

C&B Mining, R.D. #2, Box 861, Coal

Township, Pennsylvania 17866 has filed

a petition to modify the application of

30 CFR 75.1100–2(a) (quantity and

location of firefighting equipment) to its

No. 2 Vein Slope (I.D. No. 36–07813)

located in Northumberland County,

Pennsylvania. The petitioner proposes

to use only portable fire extinguishers to

replace existing requirements where

rock dust, water cars, and other water

storage are not practical. The petitioner

asserts that the proposed alternative

method would provide at least the same

measure of protection as would the

mandatory standard.

4. C&B Mining Company

[Docket No. M–95–42–C]

C&B Mining, R.D. #2, Box 861, Coal

Township, Pennsylvania 17866 has filed

a petition to modify the application of

30 CFR 75.1200 (d) & (i) (mine map) to

its No. 2 Vein Slope (I.D. No. 36–07813)

located in Northumberland County,

Pennsylvania. The petitioner proposes

to use cross-sections instead of contour

lines through the intake slope, at

locations of rock tunnel connections

between veins, and at 1,000 feet

intervals of advance from the intake

slope and to limit the mapping of mine

workings above and below to those

present within 100 feet of the vein being

mined except when veins are

interconnected to other veins beyond

the 100 feet limit through rock tunnels.

The petitioner asserts that the proposed

alternative method would provide at

least the same measure of protection as

would the mandatory standard.

5. C&B Mining Company

[Docket No. M–95–43–C]

C&B Mining, R.D. #2, Box 861, Coal

Township, Pennsylvania 17866 has filed

a petition to modify the application of

30 CFR 75.1202–1(a) (temporary

notations, revisions, and supplements)

to its No. 2 Vein Slope (I.D. No. 36–

07813) located in Northumberland

County, Pennsylvania. The petitioner

proposes to revise and supplement mine

maps on an annual basis instead of the

required 6 month interval and to update

maps daily by hand notations. The

petitioner asserts that the proposed

alternative method would provide at

least the same measure of protection as

would the mandatory standard.

6. Kerr-McGee Coal Corporation

[Docket Nos. M–95–44–C and M–95–45–C]

Kerr-McGee Coal Corporation, P.O.

Box 727, Harrisburg, Illinois 62946 has

filed petitions to modify the application

of 30 CFR 75.503 (permissible electric

face equipment; maintenance) to its

Galatia No. 56–1 Mine (I.D. No. 11–

02752) located in Saline County,

Illinois. The petitioner proposes to use

trailing cables to supply power to the

Fletcher single boom roof bolter, Model

No. CDR–13–EC–F, Approval No. 2G–

2674A–4, and all updated approval

extensions of this equipment as

applicable. The petitioner requests that

Item 1 of its petitions for modification

and MSHA’s Proposed Decisions and

Orders for granted petitions, docket

number M–91–12–C and M–94–53–C be

amended. The petitioner asserts that
18148 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 68 / Monday, April 10, 1995 / Notices

this request would facilitate equipment

replacement or additions while

maintaining the protection intended in

the Decision and Order.

7. Roberts Brothers Coal Company, Inc.

[Docket No. M–95–46–C]

Roberts Brothers Coal Company, P.O.

Box 397, Mortons Gap, Kentucky 42440

has filed a petition to modify the

application of 30 CFR 75.901(a)

(protection of low- and medium-voltage

three-phase circuits used underground)

to its Cardinal No. 2 Mine (I.D. No. 15–

17216) located in Hopkins County,

Kentucky. The petitioner proposes to

operate its Diesel Powered Generator

(DPG) without an earth referenced

ground. As an alternative, the petitioner

proposes to use resistors, ground fault

relays and trips, and SHD–GC shielded

cable. In addition, the skid base of the

DPG will provide some earth ground

protection. The petitioner states that

this diesel powered generator provides

power to different areas of the mine and

to attach a grounding conductor to the

earth referenced ground system would

reduce mobility and effectiveness of the

unit. The petitioner asserts that the

proposed alternative method would

provide at least the same measure of

protection as would the mandatory

standard.

8. Jordan Coal Company

[Docket No. M–95–47–C]

Jordan Coal Company, 133 E.

Academy Street, Shamokin,

Pennsylvania 17872 has filed a petition

to modify the application of 30 CFR

75.335 (construction of seals) to its No.

1 Slope (I.D. No. 36–07681) located in

Northumberland County, Pennsylvania.

The petitioner requests a modification

of the standard to permit alternative

methods of seal construction using

wooden materials of moderate size and

weight due to the difficulty in accessing

previously driven headings and breasts

containing inaccessible abandoned

workings; to accept a design criterion in

the 10 psi range; and to permit the water

trap to be installed in the gangway seal

and sampling tube in the monkey seal

for seals installed in pairs. The

petitioner asserts that the proposed

alternative method would provide at

least the same measure of protection as

would the mandatory standard.

9. Eastern Associated Coal Corporation

[Docket No. M–95–48–C]

Eastern Associated Coal Corporation,

800 Laidley Tower, P.O. Box 1233,

Charleston, West Virginia 25324 has

filed a petition to modify the

application of 30 CFR 75.380(f)(1)

(escapeways; bituminous and lignite

mines) to its Lightfoot No. 1 Mine (I.D.

No. 46–04332) located in Boone County,

West Virginia. The petitioner proposes

to ventilate on-board charging of

batteries with a current of air coursed

directly into the return air course; to use

intake air to ventilate the scoop batteries

that is of sufficient velocity to prevent

smoke rollback or airflow reversal

during a fire on the scoop and the

accumulation of explosives gases; to

install carbon monoxide sensors that are

part of the AMS System over the battery

charging unit; to install a mandoor in

the permanent stopping behind the

battery charger unit that would

automatically open the mandoor in the

event of a fire. The petitioner asserts

that the proposed alternative method

would provide at least the same

measure of protection as would the

mandatory standard.

10. Cross Mountain Coal, Inc.

[Docket No. M–95–49–C]

Cross Mountain Coal, Inc., 100 Coal

Drive, London, Kentucky 40741 has

filed a petition to modify the

application of 30 CFR 75.350 (aircourse

and belt haulage entries) to its Mine No.

10 (I.D. No. 40–03082) located in

Anderson County, Tennessee. The

petitioner proposes to use the air in the

belt entry to ventilate active working

places; to examine the belt conveyor

entry at least once during each coal

producting shift at intervals that would

be most effective while miners are

working; to follow all other MSHA fire

protection requirements, especially

those pertaining to water lines, fire

hoses, fire suppression systems,

warning devices, and flame-resistant

belting; and to install a low-level carbon

monoxide detection system in all belt

entries used as intake air courses as an

early warning fire detection system. The

petitioner asserts that the proposed

alternative method would provide at

least the same measure of protection as

would the mandatory standard.

11. Cross Mountain Coal, Inc.

[Docket No. M–95–50–C]

Cross Mountain Coal, Inc., 100 Coal

Drive, London, Kentucky 40741 has

filed a petition to modify the

application of 30 CFR 75.1103–4

(automatic fire sensor and warning

device systems; installation; minimum

requirements) to its Mine No. 10 (I.D.

No. 40–03082) located in Anderson

County, Tennessee. The petitioner

proposes to install a low-level carbon

monoxide detection system as an early

warning fire detection system in all belt

entries where a monitoring system

would identify a sensor location instead

of each belt flight. The petitioner asserts

that the proposed alternative method

would provide at least the same

measure of protection as would the

mandatory standard.

12. Leeco, Inc.

[Docket No. M–95–51–C]

Leeco, Inc., 100 Coal Drive, London

Kentucky 40741 has filed a petition to

modify the application of 30 CFR

75.364(b)(4) (weekly examination) to its

Mine No. 62 (I.D. No. 15–16412) located

in Perry County, Kentucky. Due to

flooding and other hazardous conditions

in Seals Nos. 1 and 2, traveling the

affected areas would be unsafe. As an

alternative, the petitioner proposes to

establish evaluations points and to

perform weekly examinations. The

petitioner states that application of the

standard would result in a diminution

of safety to the miners.

13. Peabody Coal Company

[Docket No. M–95–52–C]

Peabody Coal Company, 1951 Barrett

Court, P.O. Box 1990, Henderson,

Kentucky 42420 has filed a petition to

modify the application of 30 CFR

75.364(b) (weekly examination) to its

Camp No. 1 Mine (I.D. No. 15–02709)

located in Union County, Kentucky. The

petitioner requests that MSHA’s

Proposed Decision and Order, docket

number M–93–06–C be amended to

eliminate coverage of the 1 South seals,

2 South seals, 3 South seals, 4 South

seals, and 1 West seals off the 1

Submain North in the Decision because

these areas have been sealed since the

previous petition was granted.

14. Holnam, Inc.

[Docket No. M–95–04–M]

Holnam, Inc., 3500 Highway 120, P.O.

Box 349, Florence, Colorado 81226 has

filed a petition to modify the

application of 30 CFR 56.6901 (black

powder) to its Portland Quarry (I.D. No.

05–00037) located in Fremont County,

Colorado. The petitioner proposes to

destroy model rocket engines containing

black powder and desensitized black

powder sweepings in blast holes. The

petitioner asserts that the proposed

alternative method would provide at

least the same measure of protection as

would the mandatory standard.

15. Asbury Graphite Mills, Inc.

[Docket No. M–95–05–M]

Asbury Graphite Mills, Inc., R.D. #7,

Box 1, Kittanning, Pennsylvania 16201

has filed a petition to modify the

application of 30 CFR 56.14101 (brakes)

to its Kittanning Plant (I.D. No. 36–
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 68 / Monday, April 10, 1995 / Notices 18149

07653) located in Armstrong County,

Pennsylvania. The petitioner proposes

to install hydraulic micro lever locks on

three of its Yale Forklift Trucks instead

of standard parking brakes due to

specific situations and concerns

outlined in their petition that reduce the

effectiveness of standard pad and drum

parking brakes. The petitioner asserts

that the proposed alternative method

would provide at least the same

measure of protection as would the

mandatory standard.

16. Tg Soda Ash, Inc.

[Docket No. M–95–06–M]

Tg Soda Ash, Inc., P.O. Box 100,

Granger, Wyoming 82934 has filed a

petition to modify the application of 30

CFR 57.22215 (separation of intake and

return air (I–A, II–A, III, and V–4

mines)) to its Wyoming Soda Ash

Operations (I.D. No. 48–00639) located

in Sweetwater County, Wyoming. The

petitioner proposes to use controlled

district recirculation of mine air to

improve mine ventilation and the

quality of the miner’s work environment

by providing an excessive airflow to

dilute and carry away dust, methane,

and diesel fumes from the mining and

abandoned areas of the mine. The

petitioner states that this recirculation

fan system would be inspected during

each operating shift on a weekly basis

and that weekly examination results

would be included in the weekly

ventilation report which would be kept

on the surface; that the fan would be

monitored and the monitors checked for

proper operation on a weekly basis by

a qualified person; that mine personnel

would be familiarized and trained on

the recirculation system, monitoring

requirements, and emergency escape

procedures; and that its emergency plan

would be updated to include the

controlled recirculation system. The

petitioner asserts that the proposed

alternative method would provide at

least the same measure of protection as

would the mandatory standard.

Request for Comments

Persons interested in these petitions

may furnish written comments. These

comments must be filed with the Office

of Standards, Regulations, and

Variances, Mine Safety and Health

Administration, Room 627, 4015 Wilson

Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22203.

All comments must be postmarked or

received in that office on or before May

10, 1995. Copies of these petitions are

available for inspection at that address.

Dated: April 3, 1995.

Patricia W. Silvey,

Director, Office of Standards, Regulations and

Variances.

[FR Doc. 95–8690 Filed 4–7–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–43–P

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION

ADMINISTRATION

Privacy Act of 1974; Revisions to

Systems of Records

AGENCY: National Credit Union

Administration.

ACTION: Notification of a revised system

of records.

SUMMARY: In accordance with the

Privacy Act of 1974, as amended, the

National Credit Union Administration

(NCUA) is issuing public notice of its

intent to modify the system of records

maintained by the Office of Inspector

General (OIG), NCUA–20, currently

titled, ‘‘Investigation Files, NCUA’’,

formerly located in the NCUA Office of

Internal Auditor. The Office of Internal

Auditor preceded the Office of Inspector

General, which was created by action of

the NCUA Board on March 23, 1989, in

response to the Inspector General Act

amendments of 1988. The proposed

modifications will: (1) Rename the

system, ‘‘Office of Inspector General

(OIG) Investigative Records—NCUA;’’

(2) drop one routine use; (3) add two

new routine uses, and (4) add certain

Privacy Act exemptions. In addition, we

are making other technical and editorial

revisions to the system to make it more

accurate.

EFFECTIVE DATE: The revised system of

records will become effective without

further notice on May 10, 1995, unless

comments postmarked or posted on the

NCUA Electronic Bulletin Board on or

before that date cause a contrary

decision. If, based on NCUA’s review of

comments received, changes are made,

NCUA will publish a new final notice.

NCUA will not withhold records under

the (j)(2) or (k)(2) exemptions until

adoption of the final rule amending 12

CFR 792.34 to add the Privacy Act (j)(2)

and (k)(2) exemptions to this system of

records.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to Becky

Baker, Secretary of the Board, National

Credit Union Administration, 1775

Duke Street, Alexandria, VA 22314.

Comments may also be posted on the

NCUA Electronic Bulletin Board at 800

876–1684 or 703 518–6480. Copies of

comments may be examined in the

Office of Inspector General, 5th floor, at

1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Alexandra B. Keith, Counsel to the

Inspector General, Office of Inspector

General, National Credit Union

Administration, 1775 Duke Street,

Alexandria, VA 22314, telephone (703)

518–6352.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

NCUA/OIG performs its duties in

accordance with the Inspector General

Act of 1978, as amended by the

Inspector General Act Amendments of

1988 (Pub. L. 95–452, as amended, 5

U.S.C. App. 3)(IG Act). The OIG is an

independent unit within the NCUA and

was established to promote economy,

efficiency, and effectiveness in the

administration of NCUA programs and

operations, and to detect and prevent

fraud, waste and abuse in such

programs and operations.

The NCUA is republishing system of

records NCUA–20, currently titled,

‘‘Investigation Files—NCUA,’’ to: (1)

Rename the system; (2) drop one routine

use; (3) add two new routine uses; (4)

add the (j)(2) and (k)(2) exemptions; and

(5) update other information in the

previously published notice in this

system of records.

NCUA is renaming NCUA–20,

currently titled, ‘‘Investigation Files—

NCUA’’, to ‘‘Office of Inspector

General—Investigative Records.’’ This is

because the former publication referred

to the investigative files of the NCUA

Office of Internal Auditor, the

predecessor office of the OIG. The

system will consist of files and records

compiled by the OIG on NCUA

employees or other persons involved

with the NCUA’s programs or

operations who have been or are under

investigation for criminal or civil fraud,

abuse, and other civil and criminal

wrongdoing related to the NCUA’s

programs and operations. The NCUA/

OIG has the authority to conduct such

investigations under the IG Act.

NCUA is omitting one routine use,

number (1) ‘‘Information gathered is

used for intra-agency purposes,’’

because this routine use duplicates an

exception in the Privacy Act, at 5 USC

552a, Section (b)(1).

NCUA is adding two new routine uses

to NCUA–20: (1) To authorize the use of

OIG investigative records for obtaining

information from other sources; and (2)

to permit the disclosure of records to the

Department of Justice to obtain legal

advice. These new routine uses are

identified as routine uses numbered 1

and 2 in the system notice. Routine use

numbered 3 is a reference to Appendix

A, the agency’s standard routine uses.

The new routine uses are compatible

with the purpose for which the OIG’s