alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered September 23 , 2019

In t he



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 18

- 00890

- CR

CURTIS DEWIGHT NELSO N, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 59th Judicial District Court

Grayson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 068322



### O RDER

Before the Court is appellant’s September 20, 2019 motion for extens ion of time to file

his brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant’s brief due on or before Octo ber 21

,

2019.

/s/ CORY L. CARLYLE

JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 72 (Friday, April 14, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 19014]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9263]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Research Service


National Genetic Resources Advisory Council

    According to the Federal Advisory Committee Act of October 6, 1972 
(Pub. L. 92-463), the Agricultural Research Service announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: National Genetic Resources Advisory Council.
    Date: May 16-17, 1995.
    Time: 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m., May 16, 1995. 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m., May 17, 
1995.
    Place: USDA, South Building, Room 3109, 14th and Independence 
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250.
    Type of Meeting: Open to the public. Persons may participate in 
the meeting as time and space permit.
    Comments: The public may file written comments before or after 
the meeting with the contact person below.
    Purpose: To advance the development of the National Genetic 
Resources Program.
    Contact Person: Henry L. Shands, Director, National Genetic 
Resources Program, Building 005, Room 115, BARC-West, Beltsville, 
Maryland 20705. Telephone: 301-504-5059.

    Done at Beltsville, MD., this 30th day of March 1995.
Henry L. Shands,
Director, National Genetic Resources Program.
[FR Doc. 95-9263 Filed 4-13-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-03-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 73 (Monday, April 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19250-19251]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9377]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-5193-2]


Performance Evaluation Reports for Fiscal Year 1994 Section 105 
Grants; Missouri, Kansas, Iowa, Nebraska

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of availability of grantee performance evaluation 
reports.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA's grant regulations (40 CFR 35.150) require the Agency to 
conduct yearly performance evaluations on the progress of the approved 
State/EPA Agreements. EPA's regulations (40 CFR 56.7) require that the 
Agency make available to the public the evaluation reports. EPA has 
conducted evaluations on the Missouri Department of Natural Resources, 
Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality, Iowa Department of 
Natural Resources, and Kansas Department of Health and Environment. 
These evaluations were conducted to assess the agencies' performance 
under the grants made to them by EPA pursuant to section 105 of the 
Clean Air Act.

[[Page 19251]] EFFECTIVE DATE: April 17, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the evaluation reports are available for public 
inspection at the EPA's Region VII Air, RCRA, and Toxics Division; 726 
Minnesota Avenue; Kansas City, Kansas 66101.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carol LeValley at (913) 551-7610.

    Dated: March 22, 1995.
Michael J. Richardson,
Acting Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 95-9377 Filed 4-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7190

Johnson Electric North America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
#### John Freno et al., Respondents, v Grace S. Sutton, Appellant, et al., Defendants. (And Other Actions.)

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Andrew Tyler, J.), entered on or about February 21, 1989, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements, in view of this court’s recent holding in *Freno v Sutton*(160 AD2d 597) which dealt with the identical issue raised on the instant appeal. Concur— Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Rosenberger and Asch, JJ.
#### Susan M. KLIPSCH, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Janet H. LOHMAN, DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent/Respondent.

No. 70060.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Oct. 8, 1996.

Thomas Connelly, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., James A. Chenault, III, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Mo. Dept, of Revenue, for respondent.

Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner appeals from the circuit court’s judgment sustaining the Director’s suspension of petitioner’s driving privileges. We remand.

Petitioner’s driving privileges were suspended as a result of allegedly driving with a blood-alcohol content by weight of .10% or more, § 302.505.1, RSMo 1994.1 The suspension was sustained after an administrative hearing, §§ 302.505.2, 302.530, and she petitioned for a trial *de novo,*§ 302.535. The circuit court assigned the case to a traffic court commissioner. The commissioner heard the case and found that the suspension should be affirmed. The findings and recommendations of the commissioner were adopted and confirmed by an associate circuit judge.

The instant case is controlled by the decision in *Chamberlain v. Director of Revenue,*921 S.W.2d 138 (Mo.App. E.D.1996). *See also State ex rel. Coyle v. O’Toole,*914 S.W.2d 871 (Mo.App. E.D.1996). In *Chamberlain,*we found that an order entered after a trial *de novo*heard by a traffic commissioner was without legal effect and that the petition remained in the circuit court. *Chamberlain,*921 S.W.2d at 139.

We remand.

1

. All statutory references are to RSMo 1994.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 62 (Friday, March 31, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 16702]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8117]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


Commodity Futures Trading Commission

TIME AND DATE: 10:30 a.m., Tuesday, April 4, 1995.

PLACE: 2033 K St., N.W., Washington, D.C. 8th Floor Hearing Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Enforcement Meeting.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-254-6314.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 95-8117 Filed 3-29-95; 2:23 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
EXHIBIT
31.1






CERTIFICATIONS




I,
Gregory Lykiardopoulos certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Triton Distribution Systems,
Inc.:




2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4. The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;




(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and




(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and




5. The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.








Date: August 15,
      2008
            By: 
      /s/ Gregory
      Lykiardopoulos
              Gregory
      Lykiardopoulos
              Chief
      Executive Officer
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7119

ECM Industries LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Exhibit 18.1

Interpool, Inc.
211 College Road East
Princeton, New Jersey 08540
Ladies and Gentlemen:

We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of Interpool,
Inc. (the Company) as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related
consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders equity and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002,
and have reported thereon under date of January 9, 2004. As discussed in Note 2
to the financial statements, the Company has restated its consolidated balance
sheet as of December 31, 2001, and the related statements of income, changes in
stockholders equity and cash flows for each of the years in the two year
period ended December 31, 2001, which consolidated financial statements were
previously audited by other auditors who have ceased operations. The
aforementioned consolidated financial statements and our audit report thereon
are included in the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2002. As stated in Note 11 to those financial statements, the
Company changed as of January 1, 2000, its method of accounting for its
maintenance and repairs expenses from the accrual in advance method to the
direct expense method and states that the newly adopted accounting principle is
preferable in the circumstances because maintenance and repairs expense is not
recorded until the services are performed, and, accordingly, the direct expense
method eliminates significant estimates and judgments inherent under the accrual
in advance method. In accordance with your request, we have reviewed and
discussed with Company officials the circumstances, business judgment and
planning upon which the decision to make this change in the method of accounting
was based.

With regard to the aforementioned accounting change,
authoritative criteria have not been established for evaluating the
preferability of one acceptable method of accounting over another acceptable
method. However, for purposes of the Company's compliance with the requirements
of the Securities and Exchange Commission, we are furnishing this letter.

Based on our review and discussion, with reliance on
managements business judgment and planning, we concur that the newly
adopted method of accounting is preferable in the Companys circumstances.

Very truly yours,
KPMG LLP,
New York, New York
January 9, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5550 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5550

To amend the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1990 and 
   1991 to expand the President's authority to deny any individual's 
   admission to the United States as a representative to the United 
                                Nations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 18, 2023

Mr. Ogles (for himself and Mr. Davidson) introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1990 and 
   1991 to expand the President's authority to deny any individual's 
   admission to the United States as a representative to the United 
                                Nations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Blocking the Entry of Malign Actors 
Act''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO THE FOREIGN RELATIONS AUTHORIZATION ACT, FISCAL 
              YEARS 1990 AND 1991.

    Section 407(a)(1) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, 
Fiscal Years 1990 and 1991 (Public Law 101-246; 8 U.S.C. 1102 note), is 
amended by striking ``and'' at the end and by inserting ``or''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                               SAFETY 1ST, INC.
                     PRIMARY NET (LOSS) INCOME PER SHARE
                AND FULLY DILUTED NET (LOSS) INCOME PER SHARE


<TABLE>

<CAPTION>

                                                           Year Ended
                                                           December 31
                                                           -----------

                                                       1996            1995
                                                       ----            ----
<S>                                               <C>             <C>
PRIMARY NET (LOSS) INCOME PER SHARE

  Net (loss) income available for common
  shares and common stock equivalent shares
  deemed to have dilutive effect                  $(44,849,212)    $3,199,545
                                                  ============     ==========
  Primary net income per share                          $(6.27)          $.44
                                                  ============     ==========
SHARES USED IN COMPUTATION

  Weighted average common shares outstanding         7,157,078      7,132,010
  Common stock equivalents - stock options                   -        118,272
                                                  ------------     ----------
  Total common shares and common stock
  equivalent shares deemed to have a
  dilutive effect                                    7,157,078      7,250,282
                                                  ============     ==========
FULLY DILUTED NET (LOSS) INCOME PER SHARE

  Net (loss) income available for common
  shares and common stock equivalent
  shares deemed to have a dilutive effect         $(44,849,212)    $3,199,545
                                                  ============     ==========
  Fully diluted net income per
  share                                                 $(6.27)          $.44
                                                  ============     ==========
SHARES USED IN COMPUTATION

  Total common shares and common stock
  equivalent shares deemed to have a dilutive
  effect                                             7,157,078      7,250,282

  Additional potentially dilutive securities                 -              -
                                                  ------------     ----------
Total                                                7,157,078      7,250,282
                                                  ============     ==========


Note: In 1995, the net income per share computation presented in the statement of operations
      does not reflect common stock equivalents, as the dilutive effect is
      less than 3%.

</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002







In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FSP Galleria North Corp.
(the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned,
George J. Carter, President and principal executive officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to his
knowledge:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.











Date:
      August 8, 2008
            /s/ George J.
      Carter
              George
      J. Carter
              President
              (Principal Executive
      Officer)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jackie Moore, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Friedmann, J.), rendered July 6, 1988, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Fiber, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 26, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-6714

Pall Corporation:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
## U NITED 

## S TATES 

## N AVY



## – M ARINE 

## C ORPS 

## C OURT OF 

## C RIMINAL 

## A PPEALS

_________________________ No

. 201 700287

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v. 

### JUSTIN R. GRESHAM Sergeant (E

- 5), United States Marine Corps

Appellant

________________________ _ Appeal from the United States Navy

- Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Major Emily A. Jackson

- Hall, USMC. Convening Authority: C ommanding Officer, 2d Battalion, 2d Marine

Regiment, 2d Marine Division, Camp Lejeune, NC. Staff Judge Advocate’s Re commendation: Captain S cott A. Beimer, USMC

. For Appellant : Captain Scott F. Hallauer, JAGC, USN

.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________ Decided 21 D ecember 2017

_________________________ Before H UTCHISON , F ULTON , and G ERDING , Appell ate Military Judges

_________________________ After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S .C. § 866(c).

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL Clerk of Court