alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.01**

**Rule13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications**

I, Robert D. Ollwerther,certify that:

1. I have reviewed thisreport on Form 10-Q of ML Winton FuturesAccess LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; and

b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation;

c) Disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
| Date: November 14, 2007 |   |
|-------------------------|--------|

 
| By                                     | /s/ ROBERT D.  OLLWERTHER |   |   |
|----------------------------------------|---------------------------|--------|--------|
| Robert D.  Ollwerther                  |                      |
| Chief Executive  Officer and President |                      |
| (Principal  Executive Officer)         |                      |

 

----
**Exhibit 23**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

The Board of Directors 

First StateBancorporation: 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theregistration statements (No. 333-17727) on Form S-3, and (No. 333-3048, No. 333-92795, No. 333-83132, and No. 333-107061) on Form S-8 of First State Bancorporation of our reports dated March 2, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheetsof First State Bancorporation and subsidiary as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year periodended December 31, 2004, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, which reportsappear in the December 31, 2004, annual report on Form 10-K of First State Bancorporation. 

 

KPMG LLP 

 

Albuquerque, NewMexico 

March 11, 2005****
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Edmonds 1, Inc.,Inc. for the Quarter Ending July 31, 2005, I, Richard Neussler, ChiefExecutive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Edmonds 1, Inc. hereby certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

 

1.      SuchQuarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending July 31, 2005,fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.      Theinformation contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the periodended July 31, 2005, fairly represents in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of Edmonds 1, Inc. 

 
| Dated: September 9, 2005 |
|--------------------------|

 

**EDMONDS 1, INC.**

 
| By: | */s/  Richard Neussler*Chief Executive Officer andChief Financial Officer |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
EXHIBIT 23



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We hereby consent to incorporation by reference in the previously filed Registration Statement on Forms S-8 File Nos. 333-69420 and 333-69416,
respectively and Forms S-3 (File Nos. 33-71692 and 33-111309, respectively) of Dimeco, Inc. of our report dated February 6, 2004, relating to the consolidated statements of financial condition of Dimeco, Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 2003
and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders equity, and cash flows for the three years in the period ended December 31, 2003, which report appears in the December 31, 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
of Dimeco, Inc.



/s/ S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.




Wexford, Pennsylvania

March 22, 2004
2010 Exhibits to the 2009 Executive Management Incentive Plan



 Exhibit 10.4 

EXHIBIT A 

PARTICIPANTS AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 

UNDER THE EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN

  

			
	 Name
	  	 2010 Title

		
	John V. Faraci	  	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
		
	Tim S. Nicholls	  	SVP – Chief Financial Officer
		
	Carol L. Roberts	  	SVP – Industrial Packaging
		
	Maura A. Smith	  	SVP – General Counsel & Global Gov’t Relations
		
	Thomas G. Kadien	  	SVP – Consumer Packaging & IP Asia
		
	Mary A. Laschinger	  	SVP – President xpedx
		
	Mark S. Sutton	  	SVP – Printing & Communications Papers the Americas
		
	Tommy S. Joseph	  	SVP – Manufacturing, Technology, EHS&S and Global Sourcing
		
	Paul J. Karre	  	SVP – Human Resources & Communications
		
	Maximo Pacheco	  	SVP – President IP Europe, M. East, Africa and Russia
		
	C. Cato Ealy	  	SVP – Corporate Development
		
	John N. Balboni	  	SVP – Chief Information Officer

  

 A-1 








 Schedule 1 

EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN 

2010 COMPANY BUSINESS OBJECTIVE AND INTERMEDIATE
PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES 
  

			
	 Plan Element
	  	 162(m) Limit Approved by Committee

		
	Company Business Objective:	  	 •Positive EBITDA Before Special Items

		
	Intermediate Performance Objectives:	  	 •Same as 2010 Management Incentive Plan objectives



 

 S-1
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Mountain Bank Holding Company (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), we, Roy T. Brooks, Chief Executive Officer and Sheila M. Brumley, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: February 17, 2004



|                                       |  |  |  |                                           
|-------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------
|/s/ Roy T. Brooks                      |  |  |  | /s/ Sheila M. Brumley                     
|Roy T. Brooks, Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Sheila M. Brumley, Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5110 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.5110

                     One Hundred Eighteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
         the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-three

                                 An Act

 
 To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to clarify 
 that the prohibition on the use of Federal education funds for certain 
   weapons does not apply to the use of such weapons for training in 
               archery, hunting, or other shooting sports.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Hunting Heritage and 
Education Act''.
SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF PROHIBITION ON USE OF FEDERAL EDUCATION FUNDS 
FOR CERTAIN WEAPONS AND RELATED TRAINING.
    Section 8526(7) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 
1965 (20 U.S.C. 7906(7)) is amended by inserting ``, except that this 
paragraph shall not apply to the use of funds under this Act for 
activities carried out under programs authorized by this Act that are 
otherwise permissible under such programs and that provide students 
with educational instruction or educational enrichment activities, such 
as archery, hunting, other shooting sports, or culinary arts'' before 
the period at the end.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of First State
Bancorporation, a New Mexico corporation (the Company), for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Christopher C. Spencer, as Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to First State
Bancorporation and will be retained by First State Bancorporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                                                                                                          
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                          
|/s/    CHRISTOPHER C.
SPENCER                                                                             
|Christopher C. Spencer Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, and Principal Accounting
Officer

March 31, 2009

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Terry DICKSON, Appellant.

No. 66670.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

April 9, 1996.

*129Raymund J. Capelovitch, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Joanne E. Joiner, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

KAROHL, Judge.

Terry Dickson, (defendant), appeals conviction and eight year sentence for sale of a controlled substance. Defendant participated in a sale of cocaine to an undercover police officer.

The only claim of error is that the prosecutor, in rebuttal closing argument, “ASSERTED TO THE JURY THAT HE POSSESSED PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE, NOT AVAILABLE TO THE JURY, OF MR. DICKSON’S GUILT.” Defendant argues the trial court committed reversible error when it failed, sua sponte, to grant a mistrial or admonish the prosecutor and instruct the jury to disregard the prosecutor’s description of the process leading to the decision to charge a crime. The prosecutor, referring to the role of a police officer, made the following argument:

> They take their case, they bring the evidence into the Circuit Attorney’s Office, the Circuit Attorney’s Office decides if there is enough to make the case under the law, it gets issued, the evidence gets presented, the witnesses take the stand, the tape is here. We have a ten man team so that we can have somebody in an undercover position so that we can have an audiotape. The audiotape is beautiful, listen to it. The man is in the car talking about drugs.

In the absence of objection we review only for plain error. We find no error, plain or otherwise. First, the argument was no more than an explanation of the procedure which leads to the filing of a charge. It did not infer knowledge of facts dealing with proof of any element of the charged crime. Second, the explanation was in response to defense counsel’s closing argument attacking the police department for going after “little fish” and letting the “big fish” get away. Defense counsel had also challenged the credibility of a police officer as a witness, the police in general, and the criminal justice system. “Considerably more leeway is granted when argument is retaliatory.” *State v. Mease,*842 S.W.2d 98, 109 (Mo. banc 1992), *cert. denied,*508 U.S. 918, 113 S.Ct. 2363, 124 L.Ed.2d 269 (1993).

We affirm.

REINHARD, P.J., and GRIMM, J., concur.
#### Jeffrey ROZELLE, Employee/Appellant, v. ST. LOUIS COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, Employer/Respondent.

No. 67788.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Aug. 1, 1995.

Robert H. Sihnhold, St. Louis, for appellant.

John A. Ross, St. Louis County Counselor, Daniel Bartlett, Jr., Assoc. St. Louis County Counselor, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before GRIMM, C.J., REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Claimant appeals from an award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) denying his claim of temporary total disability but awarding him permanent partial disability. We affirm. The Commission’s award is supported by substantial and competent evidence on the whole record. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Patrick J. Dirk, certify that:

 

1.             Ihave reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of TROY Group, Inc.;

 

2.             Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

(a)           designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)           evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)           disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

 

(a)           all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)           any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.

 

 
| Date:  May 12, 2004 | /s/Patrick J. Dirk                    |   |
|--------------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                     | Patrick J. Dirk                       |
|                     | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-6899

United Scope LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5384 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for the automatic 

qualification of certain Medicaid beneficiaries for premium and costsharing subsidies under part D of the Medicare program, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 12, 2023 

Mr. PAPPAS (for himself and Mr. TONKO) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition 

to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently 

determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide 

for the automatic qualification of certain Medicaid beneficiaries for premium and cost-sharing subsidies under 

part D of the Medicare program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Advancing Enrollment 

5 and Reducing Drug Costs Act of 2023’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5384 IH

1 SEC. 2. AUTOMATIC QUALIFICATION OF CERTAIN MED2 ICAID BENEFICIARIES FOR PREMIUM AND 

3 COST-SHARING SUBSIDIES UNDER PART D OF 

4 THE MEDICARE PROGRAM. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Clause (v) of section 1860D– 

6 14(a)(3)(B) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w– 

7 114(a)(3)(B)) is amended— 

8 (1) in subclause (I), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

9 end; 

10 (2) in subclause (II), by striking the period and 

11 inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

12 (3) by inserting after subclause (II) the fol13 lowing new subclause: 

14 ‘‘(III) shall, notwithstanding the 

15 preceding clauses of this subpara16 graph, provide that any part D eligi17 ble individual not described in sub18 clause (I) or (II) who is enrolled, as 

19 of the day before the date on which 

20 such individual attains the age of 65, 

21 for medical assistance under a State 

22 plan under title XIX (or a waiver of 

23 such plan) pursuant to clause 

24 (i)(VIII) or (ii)(XX) of section 

25 1902(a)(10)(A), and who has income 

26 below 200 percent of the poverty line 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 5384 IH

1 applicable to a family of the size in2 volved, shall be treated as a subsidy 

3 eligible individual described in para4 graph (1) for a limited period of time, 

5 as specified by the Secretary.’’. 

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

7 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to plan years begin8 ning on or after January 1, 2024. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB