alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Organization Name:

Note: Representatives submitting on behalf of an organization must enter information below.

Requestor Representative:

Section 301 Investigation: China's Acts, Policies, and Practices Related to Technology 

Transfer, Intellectual Property, and Innovation - Form to Request Exclusion of Product

When submitting a product exclusion request using this form, enter the specified 

information in the following fields and explain the basis and rationale for your statements. 

By completing this form, you certify that the information provided is complete and 

correct to the best of your knowledge. 

1. Indicate whether the comment contains business confidential information (BCI), is a public

document, or is a public version of a BCI document.

3.

2. Please provide a complete and detailed description of the product of concern:

4.

5. Requestor's relationship to the product:

CONTINUED BELOW

*

10-digit HTSUS item number* for product you wish to address in this product exclusion request:

Use numerical characters only with no special characters (example: 1023456789). For help in finding 

the HTSUS item number associated with your product, see https://hts.usitc.gov/

1

7.

6. Does this submission in regulations.gov include additional attachments?

Please indicate whether any additional attachment contains business confidential

information (BCI), is a public document, or is a public version of a BCI document.

VERSION 1

Requestor Information

Requestor Name (Last, First):
END 2

8. Is this product, or a comparable product, available from sources in the United States?:

VERSION 1

11. Please provide information in support your request, taking account of the instructions

provided in Section B of the Federal Register notice (note: text entered below can extend

beyond the apparent size of this box).

9. Is this product, or a comparable product, available from sources in third countries?:

10. Please provide the value and quantity (with units) of the Chinese-origin product of concern

that you purchased for each calendar year specified. Limit this figure to the products

purchased by your firm (or by members of your trade association) alone. Please provide 

estimates if precise figures are unavailable.

2016 Value:

2015 Value:

2017 Value:

2016 Quantity:

2015 Quantity:

2017 Quantity:

PUBLIC VERSION 
SOBK210MBL

Bottled Water Coolers

Its sleek one-piece blow-molded cabinet

is made of high-density polyethylene

and incorporates UV resistance 

additives, making it a must-have for 

your rental fleet.

R Elegant and unique look

R Food grade stainless steel (SUS304)

water ways

R Large and durable drip tray

R UV resistance

R High quality components 

R 2 years Limited Warranty

30021 Tomas Street, Suite 300 | Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688, USA

Tel: 1-909-230-4753 | www.thewaterwayscompany.com

POWERED BY INNOVATION

Waterways is the premier 

cooler manufacturer in 

the industry, with a long 

legacy of high quality 

and design. The Brook 

is a continuation of our 

dedication to innovation.

MMA001_WaterwaysMarketingSlick_Brook.indd 1 11/13/17 4:12 
ATTACHMENT 1
**EXHIBIT 31.01**

**Rule13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications**

I, Benjamin Weston,certify that:

1. I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-Q of ML Winton FuturesAccess LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; and

b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation;

c)  Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

a)  All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: November 14, 2006                |                |
|----------------------------------------|---------------------|
|                                   |
| By                                     | /s/ BENJAMIN WESTON |   |   |
| Benjamin Weston                        |
| Chief Executive Officer  and President |
| (Principal Executive Officer)          |
|                                        |                     |  |  |  |

 

1

----
### No. 04–14–00342–CV

RICHARD A. RODRIGUEZ IN THE COURT OF APPEALS vs. FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. AT SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

**Advisory Regarding an Exhibit Volume of the Reporter’s Record** Comes now appellant Richard A. Rodriguez, and submits this advisory regarding a computerized exhibit volume of the reporter’s record. The reporter’s record has a volume of exhibits with the electronic file name: 04-14- 00342-CV RPT Record V3 Erminia Uviedo 7-28-14.pdf. The first page of the volume is entitled “February 11, 2014 Volume 3 of 3”. The scanning device used to create the scanned images of the exhibits produced them in a very magnified state, such that they have to be reduced significantly in order to be viewed in a normally usable fashion. The Adobe Acrobat computer screen page viewer will display the face sheet identifying the exhibit, and when the the next page is displayed–the first page of an exhibit–it is so large that it has to be reduced down to about 20% of its usual size in order to be viewed in a similar way as the exhibit face sheet. At that reduced size, the exhibit face sheets are not legible. As was noted in the advisory submitted yesterday regarding a volume of the record, this exhibit volume could still be used in preparing a brief, and so no motion to correct the record was made under Tex. R. App. P. 34.6. The undersigned does not know what scanning device and computer program were used to create the exhibit volume. This information is being provided so that its creation may be examined, and if a decision would be made to re-do the volume, it could be done while the appeal is still in progress.

1 ACCEPTED 04-14-00342-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 12/31/2014 9:26:17 AM KEITH HOTTLE CLERKRespectfully Submitted,

/s/ R. Robert Willmann, Jr.
R. Robert Willmann, Jr. P.O. Box 460167 San Antonio, Texas 78246 Tel 844-244-9973 Temporary Fax 361-552-4305 Bar No. 21655960 willaw@idworld.net Attorney for Richard A. Rodriguez **Certificate of Service**
I certify that this document was served by– electronic service, or by fax, as applicable, to Marcie Schout, Quilling, Selander, Lownds, Wislett & Moser, 2001 Bryan Street, Suite 1800, Dallas, Texas 75201 (attorney for JPMorgan Chase Bank), and e-mail to Erminia Uviedo, Court Reporter, Bexar County Justice Center, San Antonio, Texas 78205, on the 31st day of December, 2014.

/s/ R. Robert Willmann, Jr.
R. Robert Willmann, Jr.

2
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

REMEDIOS LABRADOR, 

Petitioner

v.

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, 

Respondent

______________________

2024-1986

______________________

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in No. SF-0831-22-0342-I-1.

______________________

O R D E R

The petitioner having failed to pay the docketing fee 

required by Federal Circuit Rule 52 (a) (1), and to file the 

required Statement Concerning Discrimination, and to file 

the brief required by Federal Circuit Rule 31 (a) within the 

time permitted, it is 

ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the 

same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in 

Case: 24-1986 Document: 7 Page: 1 Filed: 09/10/2024
2 LABRADOR V. MSPB

accordance with the rules. 

FOR THE COURT

September 10, 2024

Date

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: September 10, 2024

Case: 24-1986 Document: 7 Page: 2 Filed: 09/10/2024
#### Travis CARTER, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 979-89.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.

June 20, 1990.

Steven H. Swander (court appointed on appeal only), Port Worth, for appellant.

Tim Curry, Dist. Atty. and C. Chris Marshall and Helen T. Dhooghe, Asst. Dist. Attys., Fort Worth, Robert Huttash, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

TEAGUE, J., would grant the petition.

CLINTON, Judge,

concurring Opinion

On Appellant’s Petition For Discretionary Review.

This is a *“Rose*harm” case. *Rose v. State,*752 S.W.2d 529 (Tex.Cr.App.1987). The facts of the case and circumstances of the aggravated sexual assault with a deadly weapon are set out in the opinion below in *Carter v. State,*770 S.W.2d 604 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1989).

The Fort Worth Court of Appeals concluded that “the factors in this case indicate beyond a reasonable doubt the unconstitutional jury charge made no contribution to the punishment assessed.” *Id.,*at 606. Certain particulars of its rationale are at odds with the findings and holdings of this Court in *Arnold v. State,*784 S.W.2d 372 (Tex.Cr.App.1990), and the term of sixty years is suspect under the “one-third rule,” *id.,*at 383-394. But we are satisfied that a rational appellate court could determine and declare that the error did not influence the jury adversely to appellant in assessing punishment, *Arnold,*supra, at 377, that it made no contribution to punishment assessed against appellant, *id.,*at 390.

Therefore, while its reasons for decision are incorrect, the judgment of Fort Worth Court of Appeals is ultimately correct. Thus I would also refuse the PDR.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T BYRON H I BB ER T, P e titio n e r- A p p e lla n t, v. A. P. KA NE, R es po nd ent- A pp el l ee . N o. 06- 56839 D . C . N o . 2 : 0 4 -cv -0 0 5 0 4 -S JO ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia S . J a m e s O t e r o, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d F e brua ry21, 2012 ** B efo re: F E RN A N D E Z , M cK E O W N , an d B Y B E E , C i rcu i tJu d g es. C al i forni a s t at e pri soner B yr on H i bb ertappeal s pro se fr om the di stri ct co u rt ’ s j u d g m en td en yi n g h i s 2 8 U . S . C . § 2 2 5 4 h ab eas p et i t i o n . W e d i sm i ss. H i bb ertcont ends thatthe B oard’ s 200 1 d ec i si on t o d eny hi m parol e vi ol at ed hi s due pr oc e s s r i ght s be c aus e i tw a s nots upport e d by“ s om e e vi de nc e ” of 

# FI LED FEB 23 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS06- 56839 2 d a n g e r o u s n e s s a f

te rh e is d e p o rte d . A f

te rb r ie f in g w a s c o m p le te d in th is c a s e , th is c ourthe l d tha tac e rt i f

i c a t e of appe a l abi l i ty( “ C O A ” ) i s r e qui r e d t o c ha l l e nge the d e n ia l o f p a r o le . Se e H

a y w a rd v . M a rs h a ll , 603 F . 3d 546, 554- 55 ( 9th C i r . 2010) ( e n b a n c ) . N o w th e S u p r e m e C o u rt h a s h e ld th a t th e o n lyf e d e r a l r ig h t a t is s u e in the pa r ol e c ont e xti s pr oc e dur a l , a nd the onl ypr ope ri nqui ryi s w ha tpr oc e s s the in m a te r e c e iv e d , n o t w h e th e rth e s ta te c o u rt d e c id e d th e c a s e c o rr e c tly . See Sw artho utv. C oo ke , 1 3 1 S . C t. 8 5 9 , 8 6 3 ( 2 0 1 1 ) ( p e rc u r ia m ) . H ib b e rt r e c e iv e d a ll o f th e p r o c e s s to w h ic h h e w a s d u e . Se e id . a t862. A c c or di ngl y , aC O A c a nnot is s u e , a n d w e d is m is s th e ap p e a l f o rla c ko f

ju r is d ic tio n . See 2 8 U . S. C. § 2 25 3(c) (2). F urthe r , be c aus e H i bbe rtha s notha s m a de as ubs t a nt i a l s how i ng of the d e n ia l o f ac o n s titu tio n a l r ig h t, w e d e c lin e to c e rtif yh is r e m a in in g c la im s . Se e id . DI S MI S S E D.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A)
THE SOFTWARE.NET CORPORATION FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,677
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,229
<ALLOWANCES>                                        65
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,591
<PP&E>                                             193
<DEPRECIATION>                                      59
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,472
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,784
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      6,395
<COMMON>                                            45
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,850)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,472
<SALES>                                          6,592
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,592
<CGS>                                            5,675
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,675
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,346
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,395)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (357)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (1,038)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (51)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,395)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.16)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 31.1

           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
                                   ACT OF 2002

I, H. M. Busby, Chief Executive Officer of Planet Polymer Technologies, Inc.,
certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Planet Polymer
Technologies, Inc.;

      2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

      4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15-15(c)) for the
registrant and have:

      a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

      b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c) Disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's fourth
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and;

      5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
<PAGE>
      a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report information; and

      b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

/s/ H. M. Busby

H. M. Busby, Chief Executive Officer


/s/ H. M. Busby

H. M. Busby, Chief Financial Officer

August 13, 2004
Exhibit 23










               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



We  have  issued our report dated January 24, 2003 accompanying the consolidated
financial  statements  incorporated  by  reference  in the Annual Report of Flag
Financial  Corporation  on  Form  10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.  We
hereby  consent  to  the  incorporation  by  reference  of  said  report  in the
Registration  Statement  of  Flag  Financial  Corporation on Form S-8, effective
April  25,  1994,  and as amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto, effective July 25,
2000  (File  No.  33-78230).

                                                        PORTER KEADLE MOORE, LLP

                                                    /s/ Porter Keadle Moore, LLP


Atlanta,  Georgia
March  26,  2003


<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32



<PAGE>


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kranem Corporation d/b/a
Learningwire.com (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),
Stephen K. Smith, the President and Chief Executive Officer and Michael Grove
the Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of their knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects the financial condition and results of the Company.


                                          KRANEM CORPORATION
                                          d/b/a
                                          LEARNINGWIRE.COM



October 28, 2008                          By: /s/ Stephen K. Smith
                                              --------------------------------
                                              Stephen K. Smith, President and
                                              Chief Executive Officer


October 31, 2008                          By: /s/ Michael Grove
                                              --------------------------------
                                              Michael Grove, Principal Financial
                                              and Accounting Officer
#### James WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION, DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, and CEM Instruments, Inc., Respondents.

No. 66738.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

March 7, 1995.

Robert Garza, Union, for appellant.

Alan J. Downs, St. Louis, for respondents.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, James Williams, appeals from an order of the Circuit Court of Franklin County, affirming the judgment rendered by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission finding appellant disqualified from receiving unemployment compensation benefits based on appellant’s voluntary termination of his employment without good cause. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, as well as the transcripts and the legal file, and find no clear error in the findings of fact and conclusions of law. In addition, we find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We, therefore, affirm the judgment of the Circuit Court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been provided with a memorandum, solely for their own information, setting forth the reasons for our decision.