19042 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 72 / Friday, April 14, 1995 / Notices

3The appendices referenced in this notice are not

being printed in the Federal Register. Copies are

available from the Commission’s Public Reference

and Files Maintenance Branch, Room 3104, 941

North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426,

or call (202) 208–1371. Copies of the appendices

were sent to all those receiving this notice in the

mail.

except at bored road crossings, where it

would be abandoned in place.

• Construct about 0.1 mile of 3-inchdiameter pipeline to tie the existing

Line KA–14 into the replacement

pipeline.

the location of the project facilities is

shown in appendix 1.3

Land Requirements for Construction

Approximately 71 percent of the

replacement pipeline would be located

in new rights-of-way. The remaining

construction right-of-way would

partially or fully overlap Columbia’s

existing right-of-way. Columbia intends

to use a 75-foot-wide construction rightof-way. Additional working spaces

adjacent to the construction right-of-way

(such as for side hill cuts, stream

crossings, and staging areas) would be

identified during the environmental

analysis and approved before use.

Overall, about 173 acres of land

would be disturbed by construction and

abandonment, including one new access

road and 41 staging areas. Columbia

would also widen many of the 47

existing access roads to be used for the

project. Full control of all disturbed

areas outside of the new permanent

right-of-way (approximately 67 acres)

would revert back to landowners after

construction and restoration have been

completed.

The EA Process

The National Environmental Policy

Act (NEPA) requires the Commission to

take into account the environmental

impacts that could result from an action

whenever it considers the issuance of a

Certificate of Public Convenience and

Necessity. NEPA also requires us to

discover and address concerns the

public may have about proposals. We

call this ‘‘scoping’’. The main goal of the

scoping process is to focus the analysis

in the EA on the important

environmental issues. By this Notice of

Intent, the Commission requests public

comments on the scope of the issues it

will address in the EA. All comments

received are considered during the

preparation of the EA. State and local

government representatives are

encouraged to notify their constituents

of this proposed action and encourage

them to comment on their areas of

concern.

The EA will discuss impacts that

could occur as a result of the

construction and operation of the

proposed project under these general

headings:

• Geology and soils

• Water resources, fisheries, and

wetlands

• Vegetation and wildlife

• Public safety

• Land use

• Endangered and threatened species

• Cultural resources

We will also evaluate possible

alternatives to the proposed project or

portions of the project, and make

recommendations on how to lessen or

avoid impacts on the various resource

areas.

Our independent analysis of the

issues will be in the EA. Depending on

the comments received during the

scoping process, the EA may be

published and mailed to Federal, state,

and local agencies, public interest

groups, interested individuals, affected

landowners, newspapers, libraries, and

the Commission’s official service list for

this proceeding. A comment period will

be allotted for review if the EA is

published. We will consider all

comments on the EA before we

recommend that the Commission

approve or not approve the project.

Currently Identified Environmental

Issues

We have already identified several

issues that we think deserve attention

based on a preliminary review of the

proposed facilities and the

environmental information provided by

Columbia. Keep in mind that this is a

preliminary list. The list of issues may

be added to, subtracted from, or

changed, based on your comments and

our analysis. Issues are:

• Five residences are near the

replacement pipeline right-of-way.

• New and retirement construction

would cross 28 waterbodies, one of

which has been designated as a high

quality stream. Some of these

waterbodies would be crossed more

than once.

• New and retirement construction

would cross 21 wetlands.

Public Participation

You can make a difference by sending

a letter addressing your specific

comments or concerns about the project.

You should focus on the potential

environmental effects of the proposal,

alternatives to the proposal (including

alternative routes), and measures to

avoid or lessen environmental impact.

The more specific your comments, the

more useful they will be. Please follow

the instructions below to ensure that

your comments are received and

properly recorded:

• Address your letter to: Lois Cashell,

Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission, 825 North Capitol St.,

N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426;

• Reference Docket No. CP95–240–

000;

• Send a copy of your letter to: Ms.

Elizabeth Secrest, EA Project Manager,

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol St., N.E., Room 7312,

Washington, D.C. 20426; and

• Mail your comments so that they

will be received in Washington, D.C. on

or before May 16, 1995.

If you wish to receive a copy of the EA,

you should request one from Ms. Secrest

at the above address.

Becoming an Intervenor

In addition to involvement in the EA

scoping process, you may want to

become an official party to the

proceeding or become an ‘‘intervenor’’.

Among other things, intervenors have

the right to receive copies of caserelated Commission documents and

filings by other intervenors. Likewise,

each intervenor must provide copies of

its filings to all other parties. If you

want to become an intervenor you must

file a motion to intervene according to

Rule 214 of the Commission’s Rules of

Practice and Procedure (18 CFR

385.214) (see appendix 2).

The date for filing of timely motions

to intervene in this proceeding has

passed. Therefore, parties now seeking

to file late interventions must show

good cause, as required by section

385.214(b)(3), why this time limitation

should be waived. Environmental issues

have been viewed as good cause for late

intervention. You do not need

intervenor status to have your scoping

comments considered.

Additional information about the

proposed project is available from Ms.

Elizabeth Secrest, EA Project Manager,

at (202) 208–0918.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–9216 Filed 4–13–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. ER94–478–000, et al.]

Medina Power Co., et al.; Electric Rate

and Corporate Regulation Filings

April 7, 1995.

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission:
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 72 / Friday, April 14, 1995 / Notices 19043

1. Medina Power Co.

[Docket No. ER94–478–000]

Take notice that on April 4, 1995,

Medina Power Company tendered for

filing an amendment in the abovereferenced docket.

Comment date: April 21, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

2. Wisconsin Public Service Corp.

[Docket No. ER94–1007–000]

Take notice that on March 28, 1995,

Wisconsin Public Service Corporation

(WPSC) tendered for filing additional

information in support of its March 2,

1994 tender of rate schedule changes

affecting the City of Wisconsin Rapids,

Wisconsin (Wisconsin Rapids). Those

rate schedule changes consisted of a

partial requirements ‘‘W–2’’ Service

Agreement, a service agreement under

WPSC’s ‘‘T–1’’ Transmission Tariff, and

a notice of termination of all

requirements service under WPSC’s

‘‘W–1’’ Tariff. The additional

information currently submitted

consists of a cost of service analysis plus

information (i) reconciling the cost of

service data and Form 1 data, and (ii)

pertinent to plant balances and

decommissioning recoveries. In its

present filing letter, WPSC states that it

renews the request in its March 2, 1994

filing letter that the Commission make

the Service Agreements and the notice

of termination effective on May 1, 1994.

WPSC states that the filing has been

(i) served on the Wisconsin Rapids and

the Public Service Commission of

Wisconsin, and (ii) posted as required

by the Commission’s regulations.

Comment date: April 21, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

3. Northeast Utilities Service Co.

[Docket No. ER94–1591–000]

Take notice that on March 27, 1995,

Northeast Utilities Service Company

tendered for filing supplemental

information in the above-referenced

docket.

Comment date: April 21, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

4. Montana Power Co.

[Docket No. ER95–481–000]

Take notice that on March 24, 1995,

Montana Power Company (Montana)

tendered for filing with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission an

amendment to its original filing in this

Docket.

A copy of the filing was served upon

Associated Power Services, Inc.

Comment date: April 21, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

5. Southern Indiana Gas and Electric

Co.

[Docket No. ER95–599–000]

Take notice that on March 27, 1995,

Southern Indiana Gas and Electric

Company (Southern Indiana) tendered

for filing revisions to previously filed

amendments to its FERC Rate

Schedules: 1, 21, 24, 25, 27, 33, 44 and

45; involving interconnection

agreements with Ohio Valley Electric

Corporation, Public Service Company of

Indiana, Inc. (now CINergy, Inc.),

Louisville Gas & Electric Company,

Indianapolis Power & Light Company,

Inc., Hoosier Energy Rural Electric

Cooperative, Big Rivers Electric

Corporation and Wabash Valley Power

Association.

The revisions to the amendments are

intended to provide for the ratemaking

treatment of the cost of emissions

allowances under the aforementioned

rate schedules. The revisions are

intended to ensure that the amendments

will conform to the Commission’s final

rule concerning the ratemaking

treatment of emission allowances. See

Policy Statement and Interim Rule

Regarding Ratemaking Treatment of the

Cost of Emissions Allowances in

Coordination Rates, Final Rule, III FERC

Stats. & Regs ¶ 31,009, 59 FR 65930

(Dec. 22, 1994).

Comment date: April 21, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

6. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.

[Docket No. ER95–700–000]

Take notice that Niagara Mohawk

Power Corporation (NMPC) on April 4,

1995, tendered for filing with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

an executed Service Agreement between

NMPC and Citizens Power & Light

Corporation (Citizens). This Service

Agreement specifies that Citizens has

signed on to and has agreed to the terms

and conditions of NMPC’s Power Sales

Tariff designated as NMPC’s FERC

Electric Tariff, Original Volume No. 2.

This Tariff, approved by FERC on April

15, 1994 and which has an effective date

of March 13, 1993, will allow NMPC

and Citizens to enter into separately

scheduled transactions under which

NMPC will sell to Citizens capacity and/

or energy as the parties may mutually

agree.

In its filing letter, NMPC also

included a Certificate of Concurrence

executed by the Purchaser.

NMPC requests an effective date of

February 6, 1995. NMPC has requested

waiver of the notice requirements for

good cause shown.

NMPC has served copies of the filing

upon the New York State Public Service

Commission and Citizens.

Comment date: April 21, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

7. Oklahoma Gas and Electric Co.

[Docket No. ER95–800–000]

Take notice that on March 27, 1995,

Oklahoma Gas and Electric Company

(OG&E), tendered for filing Eighth

Amended Appendix D dated November

7, 1994 to Transmission Service

Agreement dated February 20, 1985

with the Oklahoma Municipal Power

Authority (OMPA).

Copies of this filing have been sent to

OMPA, the Oklahoma Corporation

Commission, and the Arkansas Public

Service Commission.

Comment date: April 21, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

8. Central Illinois Public Service Co.

[Docket No. ER95–801–000]

Take notice that on March 27, 1995,

Central Illinois Public Service Company

(CIPS), submitted a Service Agreement,

dated March 15, 1995, establishing

Wisconsin Power and Light Company as

a customer under the terms of CIPS’

Coordination Sales Tariff CST–1 (CST–

1 Tariff).

CIPS requests an effective date of

March 15, 1995, and, accordingly, seeks

waiver of the Commission’s notice

requirements. Copies of this filing were

served upon Wisconsin Power and Light

Company and the Illinois Commerce

Commission.

Comment date: April 21, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

9. IEP Power Marketing, L.L.C.

[Docket No. ER95–802–000]

Take notice that on March 27, 1995,

IEP Power Marketing, L.L.C. (IPM),

tendered for filing pursuant to Rules 205

and 207 of the Commission’s Rules of

Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.205

and 385.207, a petition for waivers and

blanket approvals under various

regulations of the Commission, and an

order accepting its Rate Schedule No. 1,

to be effective the earlier of March 22,

1995 or the date of a Commission order

granting approval of this Rate Schedule.

IPM intends to engage in electric

power and energy transactions as a

marketer and a broker. In transactions

where IPM purchases power, including

capacity and related services from

electric utilities, qualifying facilities and
19044 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 72 / Friday, April 14, 1995 / Notices

independent power producers, and

resells such power to other purchasers,

IPM will be functioning as a marketer.

In IPM’s marketing transactions, IPM

proposes to charge rates mutually

agreed upon by the parties. In

transactions where IPM does not take

title to the electric power and/or energy,

IPM will be limited to the role of a

broker and will charge a fee for its

services. IPM is not in the business of

producing or transmitting electric

power. IPM does not currently have or

contemplate acquiring title to any

electric power transmission facilities.

Rate Schedule No. 1 provides for the

sale of energy and capacity at agreed

prices.

Comment date: April 21, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

10. Illinois Power Co.

[Docket No. ER95–803–000]

Take notice that on March 27, 1995,

Illinois Power Company (Illinois

Power), tendered for filing a revision to

Appendix C of its Power Coordination

Agreement with Soyland Power

Cooperative, Inc. (Soyland). Illinois

Power states that the purpose of this

revision is to implement an agreement

between itself and Soyland relating to

the treatment of emission allowances

under the Clean Air Act Amendments.

Comment date: April 21, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

11. Puget Sound Power & Light Co.

[Docket No. ER95–804–000]

Take notice that on March 27, 1995,

Puget Sound Power & Light Company

(Puget), tendered for filing, as a change

in rate schedules, an Interconnection

Agreement, by and among Puget, Tosco

Corporation, and Public Utility District

No. 1 of Whatcom County, Washington

(the District), and Revision No. 1 to

Exhibit C to Contract No. 14–03–37050

between Puget and the Bonneville

Power Administration (BPA).

A copy of the filing was served upon

each of the District and BPA.

Puget states that the Interconnection

Agreement relates to the

interconnection of certain facilities of

Puget and the District and to the

provision of certain back-up

transmission service by Puget to the

District. Revision No. 1 to Exhibit C

concerns the addition and deletion of

certain metering and delivery points

under an exchange agreement between

Puget and BPA.

Comment date: April 21, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

12. PECO Energy Co.

[Docket No. ER95–805–000]

Take notice that on March 27, 1995,

PECO Energy Company (PECO),

tendered for filing as an initial Rate

Schedule a Transmission Service

Agreement between Rainbow Energy

Marketing Corporation (Rainbow) and

PECO. The Agreement sets forth the

terms and conditions under which

PECO will transmit electric energy over

its transmission system on behalf of

Rainbow.

PECO requests that the Commission

allow this initial Rate Schedule to

become effective 60 days after the date

of its filing.

PECO states that a copy of this filing

has been furnished to Rainbow and the

Pennsylvania Public Utility

Commission.

Comment date: April 21, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

13. Commonwealth Edison Co.

[Docket No. ER95–807–000]

Take notice that on March 27, 1995,

Commonwealth Edison Company

(ComEd), submitted a Letter Agreement,

dated February 20, 1995, between

Commonwealth Edison Company

(ComEd) and the Illinois Municipal

Electric Agency (IMEA). IMEA, acting as

Scheduling Agent for the Village of

Winnetka (Village), pursuant to the

Scheduling Agent Agreement between

ComEd, IMEA, and the Village dated

December 31, 1988, requested a oneyear extension of the transmission

service currently provided by ComEd to

Village under the terms and conditions

of Service Schedule G to the Electric

Coordination Agreement (ECA) between

ComEd and Village. In the Letter

Agreement ComEd agrees to a one-year

extension to the termination dated of

service provided in Schedule G thereby

extending the term of Schedule G to

May 31, 1998.

ComEd requests an effective date of

June 1, 1997 to coincide with the

proposed extension of service and

therefore requests waiver of the

Commission’s notice requirements

which bar the tendering for filing of a

rate schedule ‘‘more than one hundredtwenty days prior to the date on which

the electric service is to commence and

become effective * * *’’ 18 CFR 35.3.

ComEd states that good cause exists for

the requested waiver for the parties

must know for planning purposes that

the extension will be permitted to take

effective as agreed.

Copies of this filing were served upon

IMEA, the Village, and the Illinois

Commerce Commission.

Comment date: April 21, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

14. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.

[Docket No. ER95–810–000]

Take notice that on March 28, 1995,

Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation

(NMPC), tendered for filing with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

an executed Service Agreement between

NMPC and PECO Energy Company

(PECO). This Service Agreement

specifies that PECO has signed on to

and has agreed to the terms and

conditions of NMPC’s Power Sales

Tariff designated as NMPC’s FERC

Electric Tariff, Original Volume No. 2.

This Tariff, approved by FERC on April

15, 1994, and which has an effective

date of March 13, 1993, will allow

NMPC and PECO to enter into

separately scheduled transactions under

which NMPC will sell to PECO capacity

and/or energy as the parties may

mutually agree.

In its filing letter, NMPC also

included a Certificate of Concurrence

executed by the Purchaser.

NMPC requests an effective date of

March 13, 1995. NMPC has requested

waiver of the notice requirements for

good cause shown.

NMPC has served copies of the filing

upon the New York State Public Service

Commission and PECO.

Comment date: April 21, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

15. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.

[Docket No. ER95–811–000]

Take notice that on March 28, 1995,

Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation

(NMPC), tendered for filing with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

an executed Service Agreement between

NMPC and InterCoast Power Marketing

Company (InterCoast). This Service

Agreement specifies that InterCoast has

signed on to and has agreed to the terms

and conditions of NMPC’s Power Sales

Tariff designated as NMPC’s FERC

Electric Tariff, Original Volume No. 2.

This Tariff, approved by FERC, on April

15, 1994, and which has an effective

date of March 13, 1993, will allow

NMPC and InterCoast to enter into

separately scheduled transactions under

which NMPC will sell to InterCoast

capacity and/or energy as the parties

may mutually agree.

In its filing letter, NMPC also

included a Certificate of Concurrence

executed by the Purchaser.

NMPC requests an effective date of

March 14, 1995. NMPC has requested

waiver of the notice requirements for

good cause shown.
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 72 / Friday, April 14, 1995 / Notices 19045

NMPC has served copies of the filing

upon the New York State Public Service

Commission and InterCoast.

Comment date: April 21, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

16. Southern California Edison Co.

[Docket No. ER95–812–000]

Take notice that on March 28, 1995,

Southern California Edison Company

(Edison), tendered for filing the

following amendment to the Capacity

Exchange Agreement, FERC Rate

Schedule No. 148, between Edison and

the State of California Department of

Water Resources (CDWR):

Amendment No. 1

To The

Capacity Exchange Agreement

Between

Southern California Edison Company

And

State of California Department of Water

Resources

(Amendment)

The Amendment provides CDWR

with a new point of delivery at Rancho

Seco. The Amendment also simplifies

certain operating requirements for new

CDWR resources at Mojave Siphon and

Devil Canyon. Edison is requesting

waiver of the Commission’s prior notice

requirements and an effective date of

May 1, 1995.

Copies of this filing were served upon

the Public Utilities Commission of the

State of California, CDWR, and the

Sacramento Municipal Utility District.

Comment date: April 21, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

17. Southern California Edison Co.

[Docket No. ER95–813–000]

Take notice that on March 28, 1995,

Southern California Edison Company,

tendered for filing a supplemental

agreement to the 1990 Integrated

Operations Agreement with the City of

Riverside (Riverside); Commission Rate

Schedule No. 250.

The supplemental agreement sets

forth the terms and conditions for the

integration of Riverside’s purchases of

non-firm energy from Utah Municipal

Power Agency. Edison is requesting

waiver of the 60-day prior notice

requirements, and requests the

Commission to assign to the Agreement

an effective date of March 29, 1995.

Copies of this filing were served upon

the Public Utilities Commission of the

State of California and all interested

parties.

Comment date: April 21, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

18. Jersey Central Power & Light Co.,

Metropolitan Edison Co. Pennsylvania

Electric Co.

[Docket No. ER95–814–000]

Take notice that on March 28, 1995,

GPU Service Corporation (GPU), on

behalf of Jersey Central Power & Light

Company, Metropolitan Edison

Company and Pennsylvania Electric

Company (jointly referred to as the GPU

Operating Companies), filed an

executed Service Agreement between

GPU and Atlantic City Electric

Company (ACE), dated March 22, 1995.

This Service Agreement specifies that

ACE has agreed to the rates, terms and

conditions of the GPU Operating

Companies’ Operating Capacity and/or

Energy Sales Tariff (Sales Tariff)

designated as FERC Electric Tariff,

Original Volume No. 1. The Sales Tariff

was accepted by the Commission by

letter order issued on February 10, 1995

in Jersey Central Power & Light Co.,

Metropolitan Edison Co. and

Pennsylvania Electric Co., Docket No.

ER95–276–000 and allows GPU and

ACE to enter into separately scheduled

transactions under which the GPU

Operating Companies will make

available for sale, surplus operating

capacity and/or energy at negotiated

rates that are no higher than the GPU

Operating Companies’ cost of service.

GPU requests a waiver of the

Commission’s notice requirements for

good cause shown and an effective date

of March 22, 1995 for the Service

Agreement.

GPU has served copies of the filing on

regulatory agencies in New Jersey and

Pennsylvania.

Comment date: April 21, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

19. Baltimore Gas and Electric Co.

[Docket No. ER95–817–000]

Take notice that Baltimore Gas and

Electric Company (BGE), on March 29,

1995, tendered for filing as an initial

rate schedule agreement (Agreement)

between Atlantic City Electric Company

(ACE) and BGE. The Agreement

provides for the sale by BGE of energy

from its system (system energy) to ACE

on an hourly, daily, weekly, or monthly

basis (Transaction). Each Transaction is

fully interruptible. BGE states that the

timing of the Transactions cannot be

accurately estimated but that BGE will

provide the system energy to ACE at a

negotiated rate upon which the parties

will agree prior to each Transaction

when it is economical for each party to

do so. ACE will pay a Reservation

Charge to BGE for each Transaction in

an amount equal to the megawatthours

of system energy reserved for ACE by

BGE during a Transaction multiplied by

a Reservation Charge Rate negotiated

prior to each Transaction. The

Reservation Charge Rate will be subject

to a cost justified ceiling. ACE will pay

an Energy Charge for each Transaction

in an amount equal to the

megawatthours delivered by BGE during

such Transaction multiplied by an

Energy Charge Rate. The Energy Charge

Rate will be BGE’s estimated

incremental cost to supply Transaction,

to be charged for each hour of the

Transaction in which BGE supplies

energy.

Pursuant to the Commission’s

regulations, BGE requests that the

Commission waive the prior notice

requirement and allow the Agreement to

become effective April 3, 1995. ACE has

concurred with this rate schedule by its

execution of the Agreement.

Comment date: April 21, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

20. Pennsylvania-New Jersey-Maryland

Interconnection (PJM) Agreement

[Docket No. ER95–818–000]

Take notice that on March 29, 1995,

the Pennsylvania-New Jersey-Maryland

(PJM) Interconnection Association filed,

on behalf of the Parties to the PJM

Agreement, Revision No. 14 to Schedule

4.01 of the Agreement.

The purpose of this filing is to

decrease the rate applicable to capacity

deficiency transactions determined in

accordance with the PJM Agreement.

The new rate is to become effective with

the beginning of the next 12-month

Planning Period on June 1, 1995. No

changes in facilities are proposed in this

filing.

Comment date: April 21, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

21. Southern California Edison Co.

[Docket No. ER95–819–000]

Take notice that on March 30, 1995,

Southern California Edison Company

tendered for filing a Notice of

Cancellation of FERC Rate Schedule No.

250.3 and FERC Rate Schedule No.

250.4, and supplements thereto.

Comment date: April 21, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

22. Yankee Atomic Electric Company

[Docket No. ER95–835–000]

Take notice that on March 31, 1995,

Yankee Atomic Electric Company
19046 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 72 / Friday, April 14, 1995 / Notices

(Yankee) tendered for filing, a revised

decommissioning cost estimate and

funding schedule for Yankee’s nuclear

generating plant.

Yankee states that the rate change

proposed would, as a result, of an

increase in decommissioning charges,

increase Yankee’s rates by $30.2 million

annually.

Yankee states that copies of its filing

have been provided to its wholesale

customers and to state regulatory

commissions in Connecticut, Vermont,

New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Maine

and Rhode Island.

Comment date: April 21, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

23. Maine Public Service Co.

[Docket No. ER95–836–000]

Take notice that on March 31, 1995,

Maine Public Service Company

tendered for filing an initial rate

schedule a Transmission Service and

Ancillary Services Tariff.

Comment date: April 21, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

24. Charles W. Wells

[Docket No. ID–2435–001]

Take notice that on March 24, 1995,

Charles W. Wells (Applicant) tendered

for filing an application under Section

305(b) of the Federal Power Act to hold

the following positions:

Director: Illinova Corporation

Director and Officer: Illinois Power Company

Director: First of America Bank-Illinois, N.A.

Comment date: April 21, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs

E. Any person desiring to be heard or

to protest said filing should file a

motion to intervene or protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street, NE.,

Washington, DC 20426, in accordance

with Rules 211 and 214 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR

385.214). All such motions or protests

should be filed on or before the

comment date. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–9201 Filed 4–13–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

[Project 2442–001 New York]

City of Watertown; Notice of

Availability of Draft Environmental

Assessment

April 10, 1995.

In accordance with the National

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and

the Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission’s (Commission’s)

Regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No.

486, 52 FR 47897), the Office of

Hydropower Licensing has reviewed the

application for major new license for the

proposed Watertown Project, located in

Jefferson County and has prepared a

Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA)

for the project. In the DEA, the

Commission’s staff has analyzed the

potential environmental impacts of the

proposed project and has concluded

that approval of the project, with

appropriate mitigation or enhancement

measures, would not constitute a major

federal action significantly affecting the

quality of the human environment.

Copies of the DEA are available for

review in the Public Reference Branch,

Room 3104, of the Commission’s offices

at 941 North Capitol Street N.E.,

Washington, D.C. 20426.

Please submit any comments within

30 days from the date of this notice and

should be addressed to Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission, 825 North Capitol Street

N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426. Please

affix Project No. 2442–001 to all

comments. For further information,

please contact Peter Leitzke,

Environmental Coordinator, at (202)

219–2803.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–9200 Filed 4–13–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

[FRL—5191–4]

Agency Information Collection

Activities Under OMB Review

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: In compliance with the

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.

3501 et seq.), this notice announces that

the Information Collection Request (ICR)

abstracted below has been forwarded to

the Office of Management and Budget

(OMB) for review and comment. The

ICR describes the nature of the

information collection and its expected

cost and burden.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on

or before May 15, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION OR A COPY

CALL: Sandy Farmer at EPA, (202) 260–

2740, please refer to ICR #0794.07.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and

Toxic Substances

Title: Notification of Substantial Risks

Under Section 8 of the Toxic Substances

Control Act (TSCA). (EPA ICR No.

0794.07; OMB No. 2070–0046).

Abstract: Under Section 8(e) of TSCA,

chemical manufacturers, importers,

processors, and distributors must

immediately inform EPA when they

obtain information which indicates that

their product(s) may present a

substantial risk of injury to health or the

environment. Section 8(e) of TSCA is an

important and useful tool for early

warning and the identification of new

substantial risks posed by exposure to

chemical substances. The EPA and other

Federal agencies use this information to

determine and control chemical risks.

Burden Statement: Public reporting

burden for this collection of information

is estimated to average 21 hours per

initial Section 8(e) submission and 4

hours per follow-up/supplemental

Section 8(e) submission. EPA

experience has shown that

approximately 2.2 follow-up/

supplemental Section 8(e) submissions

are received on a yearly basis per initial

submission. This estimate includes the

time needed to review instructions,

gather and submit the data needed, and

complete and review the collection of

information.

Respondents: Chemical

manufacturers, importers, processors,

and distributors.

Estimated Number of Respondents:

1440.

Frequency of Collection: On Occasion.

Estimated Number of Responses per

Respondent: 3.

Estimated Total Annual Burden on

Respondents: 13,400 hours.

Send comments regarding the burden

estimate, or any other aspect of this

collection of information, including

suggestions for reducing the burden,

(please refer to EPA ICR #794.07 and

OMB #2070–0046) to: