alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6795

Otis Elevator Co: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions.

pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>       THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL
               INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE MEDISYS
               TECHNOLOGIES, INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
               PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
               ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
               STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>   1
       
<S>                           <C>            
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 YEAR           
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                     JAN-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                      DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                  2,178
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                          11,653
<ALLOWANCES>                              648
<INVENTORY>                            21,004
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       55,687
<PP&E>                                 89,151
<DEPRECIATION>                         51,050
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        497,884
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 835,930
<BONDS>                               253,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                6,560     
<OTHER-SE>                          6,373,102     
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          497,884
<SALES>                                97,634
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       97,634
<CGS>                                  29,797
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       1,829,401
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      360,922
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    379,142
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (2,092,689)
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               (2,092,689)
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                      (2,092,689)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          (.017)
<EPS-DILUTED>                          (.017)
        

</TABLE>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

SAMSON MARTIN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D15-1625

[February 3, 2016]

Appeal of orders denying rule 3.850 and 3.800(a) motions from the 

Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Lisa 

M. Porter, Judge; L.T. Case No. 02-003228 CF10B.

Samson Martin, Mayo, pro se.

No brief required for appellee.

ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We grant in part the appellant’s motion for rehearing, but only to clarify 

that the defendant’s appeal is from the denial of both his Florida Rule of 

Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion and his Florida Rule of Criminal 

Procedure 3.800(a) motion. We otherwise deny the appellant’s motion for 

rehearing in all other respects, and thereby maintain our affirmance of the 

defendant’s appeal on the merits. See Martinez v. State, 169 So. 3d 170 

(Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, C.J., MAY and GERBER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CAMBER ENERGY, INC.****Certification Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Camber Energy, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2020, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James Doris, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |
|   | (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

 

|               | */s/**James Doris*     |   |
|--------------------|-----------------------------|--------|
| Date: May 18, 2022 | James Doris                 |   |
|               | Principal Executive Officer |   |
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 
  (1)
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Health Benefits Direct
Corporation;(2)
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;(3)
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects, the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;(4)
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluations; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 (5)
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
  /s/ ALVIN H. CLEMENSAlvin H. ClemensChief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Dimeco, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, we, Gary C. Beilman, Chief Executive Officer, and Maureen H. Beilman, Chief
Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Gary C. Beilman     |  | /s/ Maureen H. Beilman 
|Gary C. Beilman         |  | Maureen H. Beilman     
|Chief Executive Officer |  | Chief Financial Officer

Date: March 25, 2011
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,2009 (the “Form 10-Q”) of Cardinal Financial Corporation (the “Company”),I, Mark A. Wendel, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, herebycertify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

(a)           the Form 10-Q fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and

 

(b)           the information contained in the Form 10-Qfairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial conditionand results of operations of the Company and its subsidiaries as of, and for,the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.

 

 
| Date:  May 8, 2009 |   | /s/  Mark A. Wendel                                   |
|-------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                    |   | Mark  A. Wendel                                       |
|                    |   | Executive  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 72 (Friday, April 14, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 19036]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9197]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP95-76-000]

Texas Eastern Transmission Corp.; Notice of Site Visit

April 10, 1995.
    On May 3, 1995, the Office of Pipeline Regulation staff, 
accompanied by representatives of Texas Eastern Transmission 
Corporation (Texas Eastern), will inspect the proposed location of 
Texas Eastern's Line I-A Loop, and Line I-H Upgrade in the Philadelphia 
Lateral Expansion Project. The proposed facilities are in Chester, 
Delaware, and Philadelphia Counties, Pennsylvania.
    Parties to the proceeding may attend. Those planning to attend must 
provide their own transportation. For further information, call Jeff 
Gerber, (202) 208-1121.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-9197 Filed 4-13-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 76 (Thursday, April 20, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 19747]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9796]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Board of Visitors to the United States Naval Academy; Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 
U.S.C. app. 2), notice is hereby given that the Board of Visitors to 
the United States Naval Academy will meet on May 1, 1995, at Alumni 
Hall, United States Naval Academy, at 8:30 a.m. The session will be 
open to the public.
    The purpose of the meeting is to make such inquiry as the Board 
shall deem necessary into the state of morale and discipline, the 
curriculum, instruction, physical equipment, fiscal affairs, and 
academic methods of the Naval Academy.
    For further information concerning this meeting contact: Lieutenant 
Commander Timothy A. Batzler, U.S. Navy, Executive Secretary to the 
Board of Visitors, Office of the Superintendent, United States Naval 
Academy, Annapolis, MD 21402-5000, Telephone: (410) 293-1503.

    Dated: April 11, 1995.
L. R. McNees,
LCDR, JAGC, USN, Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-9796 Filed 4-19-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
#### In the Matter of M. SNOW, Jr., In the Matter of Vicki Fletcher, In the Matter of Dwayne D. Goodson, Aaron W. Edlin, Appellants, v. DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, Respondent.

Nos. WD 51751—WD 51753.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

June 18, 1996.

*67Thomas Fritzlen, Kansas City, for appellants.

Sharon Ann Willis, Division of Employment Security, Kansas City, Sandy Bowers, Government Counsel, Jefferson City, John B. Keller, Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before LOWENSTEIN, P.J., and HANNA and SPINDEN, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Aaron W. Edlin appeals from separate orders of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission finding that he occupied an employer-employee relationship with all of the cable installers he used in his business, and that Vicki Fletcher and Dwayne Goodson were entitled to wage credits based upon remuneration paid to them by Edlin for their cable installation services.

Affirmed, Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 32





                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly report of Petramerica Oil, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Earnest
Mathis, Jr., Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



                                            /s/ Earnest Mathis, Jr.
                                            -----------------------
                                            Earnest Mathis, Jr.
                                            Chief Executive Officer, President
                                               and Chief Financial Officer

                                            August 4, 2005
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5025

Radio Systems Corp:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_5-30-2019.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Ricky CARWILE, Appellant.

No. 63308.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Oct. 12, 1993.

Raymond L. Legg, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Ricky Carwile, appeals from his convictions, after a jury trial, of burglary in the second degree and felony stealing. He was sentenced as a prior offender to imprisonment for two concurrent terms of six years to run concurrently with a sentence already being served in conjunction with a prior burglary conviction.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. Defendant’s convictions are affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
Order filed, April 12, 2016

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO S . 14

- 15

- 01066

- CR 14

- 15

- 01067

- CR 14

- 15

- 01068

- CR

____________ DYLAN ANDREW QUICK , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 339th District Court

Harris County, Texas Tr ial Court Cause No. 1383658 , 1383659, 1383660



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due April 01, 2016

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record.
The record has not been filed with the court. Because t he reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Patricia Palmer , the substitute court reporter, to file the record in this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order

. PER CURIAM
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6477

OK International, Inc:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_05.09.19.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-16-0000766

01-FEB-2017

01:33 PM
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 77 (Friday, April 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 19966]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9867]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Physics; Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Physics (#1208).
    Date: May 11-12, 1995.
    Place: Room 456, Cornell Theory Center, Cornell University, 
Ithaca, New York.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Barry Schneider, Program Director, 
Theoretical Physics, Physics Division, room 1015, National Science 
Foundation, 4201 Arlington Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: 
(703) 306-1808.
    Purpose of Meeting: To assess the recent progress, and future 
plans of the Black Hole Binaries Computational Grand Challenge 
Alliance, after its first year of operation.
    Agenda: To review the initial physics and computer-science 
accomplishments, as well as the management, schedule, budget, and 
plans for the future.
    Reason for Closing: The Project plans being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary nature or confidential nature, 
including technical information; financial data, such as salaries; 
and personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: April 17, 1995.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-9867 Filed 4-20-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M