alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.2
 
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of JayHawk Energy, Inc. a Colorado
corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), Thomas G. Ryman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and
 
 (2)
              The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and result of operations of the
Company.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
JayHawk Energy, Inc., and will be retained by JayHawk Energy, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
  /s/
      Thomas G. RymanThomas
      G. Ryman
                    Chief
      Financial Officer
                    February
      12, 2009
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 72 (Friday, April 14, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 19050]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9187]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION


Public Information Collections Approved by Office of Management 
and Budget

April 6, 1995.
    The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has received Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) approval for the following public 
information collections pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 
1980, Pub. L. 96-511. For further information contact Shoko B. Hair, 
Federal Communications Commission, (202) 418-1379.

Federal Communications Commission

OMB Control No.: 3060-0149.
    Expiration Date: 03/31/98.
    Title: Part 63--Section 214 Application and Supplemental 
Information Requirements (Sections 63.01-63.601).
    Estimated Annual Burden: 6820 total annual hours; 13 hours per 
response.
    Description: In Telephone Company-Cable Television Cross-Ownership 
Rules, Sections 63.54-63.58, CC Docket 87-266, Memorandum Opinion and 
Order on Reconsideration and Third Further Notice of Proposed 
Rulemaking, FCC 94-269 (released November 7, 1994), the Commission 
requires, among other things, local exchange carriers (LECs) providing 
video dialtone service to notify the Chief of the Common Carrier Bureau 
of any anticipated or existing capacity shortfall in their video 
dialtone platform and of plans for addressing such shortfall. Such 
notice must be provided within thirty days after the LEC becomes aware 
of an anticipated shortfall or within five days after denying capacity 
to a video programmer, whichever occurs first. The Commission also 
conforms its existing enhanced services safeguards against 
anticompetitive conduct by adding video dialtone delivery service to 
the service categories for which it requires that Regional Bell 
Operating Companies (RBOCs) and GTE Service Corporation (GTE) report 
installation and maintenance activities. In addition, the Commission 
requires the RBOCs and GTE to file a detailed description of the types 
of Customer Proprietary Network Information to which they anticipate 
having access as providers of video dialtone service, and to explain 
how they would plan to use such information in marketing video dialtone 
services to video programmers or consumers.

Federal Communications Commission.
William F. Caton,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-9187 Filed 4-13-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7549

SGRE, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 73 (Monday, April 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 19250]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9325]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP95-308-000]


Viking Gas Transmission Company; Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

April 11, 1995.
    Take notice that on April 7, 1995, Viking Gas Transmission Company 
(Viking), 825 Rice Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55117, filed in Docket 
No. CP95-308-000 a request pursuant to Secs. 157.205 and 157.212 of the 
Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205 and 
157.212) for authorization to add a new delivery point for firm 
transportation services that Viking currently provides for Northern 
States Power Company-Minnesota (NSPM), under the blanket certificate 
issued in Docket No. CP88-679-000, pursuant to Section 7(c) of the 
Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set forth in the request which is on 
file with the Commission and open to public inspection.
    Viking proposes to construct and operate a 2-inch hot tap, 
measurement, and data acquisition equipment in Chisago County, 
Minnesota to establish the new Taylors Falls delivery point for NSPM. 
It is indicated that Viking and NSPM are parties to gas transportation 
agreements dated June 1, 1994, under which Viking currently provides a 
maximum daily summertime quantity of 35,215 million Btu and wintertime 
quantity of 56,000 million Btu of firm transportation service under 
Viking's Rate Schedule FT-A. It is also indicated that NSPM has 
requested deliveries of up to 1,012 mcf per day at the proposed 
delivery point. Viking estimates a facility cost of $138,900 and 
indicates that NSPM has agreed to reimburse Viking for the cost of 
facilities.
    Viking advises that the total volumes to be delivered to NSPM after 
the request do not exceed the total volumes authorized prior to the 
request. Also, Viking indicates that the proposed activity is not 
prohibited by its existing tariff and that it has sufficient capacity 
to accommodate the changes proposed herein without detriment or 
disadvantage to its other customers.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Sec. 157.205 of the 
Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to the 
request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, the 
proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the day 
after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed and 
not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-9325 Filed 4-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5472

DENSO International America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 73 (Monday, April 17, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 19330]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9468]



      


                Sunshine Act Meetings



Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 73 / Monday, April 17, 1995 / 
Sunshine Act Meetings



[[Page 19330]]


Tennessee Valley Authority

[Meeting No. 1475]

TIME AND DATE: 9 a.m. (EDT), April 19, 1995.


PLACE: TVA Chattanooga Office Complex, 1101 Market Street, Chattanooga, 
Tennessee.

STATUS: Open.

AGENDA: Approval of minutes of meeting held on March 15, 1995.

ACTION ITEMS:

New Business

C--Energy

    C1. Adoption of a TVA-side Internal Energy Management Policy 
committing TVA to leadership in efficient and environmentally sound 
use of energy, and delegation of authority to the Chief Operating 
Officer, or his designee, to appoint a TVA representative to the 
Federal Interagency Energy Policy Committee to develop and modify an 
energy management plan to achieve the objectives of the policy.
    C2. Personal services contract with NUMANCO to provide 
radiological control technicians at TVA nuclear sites.

E--Real Property

    E1. Deed modification affecting approximately 0.074 acre of 
private land on Kentucky Lake in Benton County, Tennessee, Tract NO. 
XGIR-606, to clear an existing title problem and resolve a deed 
violation.
    E2. Amendment of the Kentucky Reservoir Land Management Plan to 
change the allocated uses from public recreation and visual 
management to commercial recreation for a 4-acre portion of Tract 
No. XGIR-6PT in Livingston County, Kentucky, and sale of a permanent 
recreation easement for the same area to Tullar Enterpries, which is 
being designated as Tract No. XGIR-923RE.
    E3. Grants of permanent easements to Hamilton County, Tennessee, 
for a sewage pump station and sewerlines affecting approximately 
1.61 acres on Chickamauga Lake, Tract Nos. XTCR-186PS and 187S.

Information Items

    1. Implementation of the decision of the Secretary of Labor in 
the wage dispute involving the International Brotherhood of Electric 
Workers resulting from the 56th Annual Wage Conference in 1991.
    2. New investment managers and proposed new Investment 
Management Agreements between the Tennessee Valley Authority 
Retirement System, Equitable Asset Management, Inc., and Bradford & 
Marzec, Inc.
    3. Revisions to interruptible power programs offering limited 
firm power and modifications to limited interruptible power and 
economy surplus power programs.
    4. Commodity-based rate for SKW Metals and Alloys, Inc.
    5. Supplement to Contract No. TV-92582V with Fitzgerald & 
Company for advertising support.
    6. Settlement of claims and transfer of contract with Southern 
Illinois Mining Company, Inc.

FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Please call TVA Public Relations at (615) 632-6000, Knoxville, 
Tennessee. Information is also available at TVA's Washington Office 
(202) 898-2999.

    Dated: April 12, 1995.
Edward S. Christenbury,
General Counsel and Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-9468 Filed 4-13-95; 3:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8120-08-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-6640

JAMES CROSS, JR.,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

KAREN PSZCZOLKOWSKI,

 Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at 

Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:18-cv-00069-GMG)

Submitted: August 22, 2019 Decided: August 27, 2019

Before KING and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Cross, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Lindsay Sara See, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY 

GENERAL, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

James Cross, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) 

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of 

appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 

473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district 

court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the 

dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of 

the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Cross has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to 

proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
#### In the Matter of Kent H., a Person Alleged to be in Need of Supervision.

(Appeal No. 2.)

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and matter remitted to Erie County Family Court for further proceedings, in accordance with the same memorandum as in *Matter of Kent H.*([appeal No. 1] 162 AD2d 1058 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from order of Erie County Family Court, Honan, J.—PINS.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Denman, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6587

Apex Tool Group, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5305 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5305

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1157 West Mission Avenue in Escondido, California, as the ``Captain 
               E. Royce Williams Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 29, 2023

   Mr. Issa introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1157 West Mission Avenue in Escondido, California, as the ``Captain 
               E. Royce Williams Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CAPTAIN E. ROYCE WILLIAMS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1157 West Mission Avenue in Escondido, California, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Captain E. Royce Williams Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Captain E. 
Royce Williams Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.90 Direct Dial: (310) 297-3287
Direct Fax: (310) 297-3142 March 28, 2005 Via Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested Denis Retoske
A Professional Law Corporation
1850 Capri Circle
Costa Mesa, CA 92626  Re:
    Notice of Termination of Consulting Relationship Dear Denis: Peerless Systems Corporation (the Company) has decided to terminate the Peerless/Consultant
Consulting Agreement by and between you and the Company, dated as of June 4, 2004, and any addenda
thereto (the Agreement). Id like to take this opportunity to personally thank you for your
service to the Company. It has been a pleasure working with you. Pursuant to Section 2.2 of the
Agreement, the Company is required to provide fifteen (15) days prior written notice. Accordingly,
the termination will become effective fifteen (15) days following your receipt of this letter. I understand that you have previously spoken with Howard regarding the termination of your
options to purchase shares of the Companys common stock. This letter will also serve to confirm
our mutual understanding that, in accordance with the terms of the Confidential Separation
Agreement and Mutual Release by and between you and the Company, dated as of June 4, 2004, all of
the outstanding options previously granted to you to purchase shares of the Companys common stock
will terminate on June 4, 2005. Please note that because your options may only be exercised on a
business day, your options must be exercised, if at all, no later than 5:00 p.m. PST on June 3,
2005. Naturally, if you have any questions regarding the above, please do not hesitate to contact
me. I wish you all the best in your future endeavors. Sincerely, /S/ ELLIOT M. SHIRWO Elliot M. Shirwo
Assistant General Counsel  cc:
    Howard J. Nellor
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

April 12, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6127

Alter Trading Corporation: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_04.15.19.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel