alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                      CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Robert W. Hughes certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of OC Financial, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of circumstances under which such statements were
     made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material respect
     the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
     registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
     of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting.

Date: February 12, 2007


/s/ Robert W. Hughes
-----------------------------------------------
Robert W. Hughes
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
| 1) |   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2) |   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Registrant. |
|----|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                          |   |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| /s/                Michael J. Quillen                                         |   |
|                  Michael J.                Quillen                       |   |   |
| Chairman                of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer |   |   |
| (Principal                Executive Officer)                                  |   |   |
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-6924

Polaris Industries Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

“Made in China 2025” or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5473 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5473

  To amend certain laws relating to disaster recovery and relief with 
    respect to the implementation of building codes, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 14, 2023

  Mr. Edwards (for himself and Mr. Norcross) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend certain laws relating to disaster recovery and relief with 
    respect to the implementation of building codes, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Promoting Resilient Buildings Act of 
2023''.

SEC. 2. PREDISASTER HAZARD MITIGATION.

    Section 1234 of the Disaster Recovery Reform Act of 2018 (42 U.S.C. 
5133 note) is amended by striking subsection (d).

SEC. 3. HAZARD MITIGATION REVOLVING LOAN FUND PROGRAM.

    Section 205(f)(5) of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and 
Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5135(f)(5)) is amended--
            (1) in the paragraph heading by striking ``Establishing'' 
        and insert ``Implementing'';
            (2) by striking ``establish'' and insert ``implement'';
            (3) by inserting ``2'' after ``latest''; and
            (4) by inserting ``, including any amendments made by 
        State, local, Tribal, or territorial governments to such codes, 
        specifications, and standards,'' after ``standards''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Donna E. FARROW, Respondent, v. David L. FARROW, Appellant.

No. WD 48378.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Oct. 11, 1994.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Nov. 29, 1994.

Daniel L. Radke, St. Joseph, for appellant.

Ralph W. Hicks, St. Joseph, for respondent.

Before ELLIS, P.J., and BERREY and SMART, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

This dissolution of marriage case involves issues relating to child custody and valuation of assets. David L. Farrow appeals from the decree of dissolution entered by the trial court. Farrow also appeals from the trial court’s order denying his motion to amend and/or correct the judgment.

Judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7506

A.W. Chesterton Company:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
NEW 2019 NEW 2019

FINAL PRODUCT

NEW
Applica Water Products LLC is a very small, family-owned and operated, manufacturer of water

filtration & humidifier systems and sell under our CLEAR2O® brand. We source manufacture our own

designs and sell water filtration systems as our only line of business, we are headquartered in

Miramar, Florida.

Currently, 100% percent of our water filtration & humidifier products are sourced from China. Of which,

90% of those imported water filtration products & filters are only available from China due to the

location of our owned-tooling placed with 3rd party China manufacturers.

At present, our design & formulation is unique and thus comparable products are not available

in the US or from other countries. Additionally, major infrastructure changes need to be

implemented to facilitate reasonable priced products for the overall water filtration industry.

Currently, the USA and other countries lack the equipment infrastructure to cost-effectively

manufacture those parts needed to complete our line of products.

Applica Water Products LLC will experience an economic hardship due to the additional ad

valorem of 25 percent on all water filtration parts from China. Based on the annual volume of all

combined water filtration parts and accessories, the total tariffs on the next rounds of

containers will result in an immediate reduction of our net profits before taxes by a significant

amount. As a result, this event will cause a reduction in jobs, sales jobs, access to financing

options and / or higher financing costs.

As a small business in the water filtration industry, it will not be competitive to increase

consumer prices to mitigate the cost of tariffs. Price increases will result in the loss of long-term

and new customers. We are operating on a shoe-string budget. So, any internal cost cutting

will severely impact our daily operations. The long-term impact of these untimely tariffs will

result in net losses for our company, which ultimately reduces healthy competition in the water

filtration industry.

Our water filtration parts and accessories are not a part of the Made in China 2025.

In summary, we sincerely request that your office approves the exclusion of tariffs for Applica

Water Products LLC due to this untimely economic hardship.

Sincerely,

Keith Bernard

President

Applica Water Products LLC

954-998-1909

Keith.bernard@applicawater.com

www.clear2o.com
#### In the Interest of M.R.P. (Juvenile), Plaintiff. Mark WHITEAKER, Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. C.P. and J.P. (Natural Parents), Appellants.

No. WD 41745.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Feb. 27, 1990.

George M. Ely, Hamilton, for appellants.

R.E. Moulthrop, Bethany, guardian ad litem.

Randall D. Thompson, Bethany, for respondent.

Before GAITAN, P.J., and CLARK and MANFORD, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Direct appeal from a judgment of parental termination, pursuant to § 211.447.2, RSMo 1986.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
#### Patrick Wayne SHOOK, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 42430.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Feb. 27, 1990.

Janet M. Thompson, Columbia, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Andrea K. Spillars, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before KENNEDY, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and BERREY, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from denial of Rule 27.26 motion for postconviction relief.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

The Board of Directors

 

Sanmina-SCI Corporation:

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-131360, 333-61042, 333-50282, 333-39316, 333-95467, 333-84221, 333-84039, 333-76279, 333-71313, and 33-97782) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-165435, 333-157099, 333-84704, 333-112605, 333-108942, 333-104692, 333-100236, 333-87946, 333-83110, 333-75616, 333-64294, 333-39930, 333-79259, 333-23565, 33-90244, and 33-66554) of Sanmina-SCI Corporation of our report dated November 24, 2010, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Sanmina-SCI Corporation as of October 2, 2010 and October 3, 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended October 2, 2010, and the related financial statement schedule, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of October 2, 2010, which report appears in the October 2, 2010 annual report on Form 10-K of Sanmina-SCI Corporation.

 

Our report dated November 24, 2010 refers to an accounting change upon adoption of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141(R) (Revised 2007), *Business Combinations* (ASC Topic 805*, Business Combinations*), at the beginning of fiscal 2010.

 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

Mountain View, California

May 24, 2011

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 102 (Friday, May 28, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 28833]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-11437]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK


Sunshine Act Meetings; Notice of Open Meeting of the Sub-Saharan 
Africa Advisory Committee of the Export-Import Bank of the United 
States (EXIM)

TIME AND DATE: Thursday, June 10, 2021 from 2:00-4:30 p.m. EDT.

PLACE: The meeting will be held virtually.

STATUS: Public Participation: The meeting will be open to public 
participation and time will be allotted for questions or comments 
submitted online. Members of the public may also file written 
statements before or after the meeting to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6f0a171b0a1d010e032f0a17060241080019"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="62071a1607100c030e22071a0b0f4c050d14">[email protected]</span></a>. Interested 
parties may register for the meeting at https://app.smartsheet.com/b/form/962a72a980114463a90ba5752d549566.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Discussion of EXIM policies and programs 
designed to support the expansion of financing support for U.S. 
manufactured goods and services in Sub-Saharan Africa.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information, contact 
India Walker, External Engagement Specialist at 202-480-0062.

Joyce B. Stone,
Assistant Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-11437 Filed 5-26-21; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 3626

_____________________________
E ARL J AMES R AY , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Mark Borello , Judge

. July 17, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. See Baker v. State , 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004).

L EWIS , M AKAR , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________ Earl James Ray, pro se
, Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jennifer J. Moore
, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20 - 0 119 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JOHN LEO STEGER,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including October 2 8 , 2020 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 18 2020

09/18/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0119
SECOND SUPPLEMENT TO THE

                    CONFIDENTIAL PRIVATE PLACEMENT MEMORANDUM

                                February 29, 2000

        Tennessee Lithotripters Limited Partnership I Assignment Offering

                          1900 Church Street, Suite 101
                               Nashville, TN 37203


                  Lithotripters,  Inc., a North Carolina corporation  ("Litho"),
by this Second Supplement hereby amends and supplements its Confidential Private
Placement  Memorandum  of January 14,  2000,  as  previously  supplemented  (the
"Memorandum")  offering for assignment units of limited partnership  interest in
Tennessee  Lithotripters Limited Partnership I, a Tennessee limited partnership.
Capitalized  terms used  herein are  defined in the  Glossary  appearing  in the
Memorandum.  Persons who have subscribed for or are considering an investment in
the  Units  offered  by the  Memorandum  should  carefully  review  this  Second
Supplement.

Extension of the Offering

                  Pursuant to the authority  reserved by the General  Partner in
the Memorandum,  the General Partner hereby elects to extend the Closing Date to
March 15, 2000 (or such  earlier  date as the General  Partner  may, in its sole
discretion, otherwise elect).

                  Questions concerning this Second Supplement should be directed
to the Sales Agent at (800) 682-7971.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 14, 2017

No. 04-16-00822-CR

Kenon MCDONALD,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR0794

Honorable Melisa Skinner, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On October 5, 2017, appellant’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief and motion to 

withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he asserted there are 

no meritorious issues to raise on appeal. Counsel certified he served copies of the brief and 

motion on appellant, provided appellant a copy of the record on appeal, and explained to 

appellant his right to file a pro se brief. See Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85 (Tex. App.—

San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 

1996, no pet.).

Now pending before this court is a pro se motion filed by appellant wherein he expresses 

his desire to file a response to counsel’s Anders brief. Appellant requests an extension of time in 

which to file his response. Appellant also requests appointment of new counsel to assist him in 

preparing his response. Court-appointed counsel’s motion to withdraw has not been granted and 

he remains as appellant’s attorney of record until such a time as this court rules on his motion. 

Accordingly, appellant’s request for new counsel is DENIED. 

We GRANT appellant’s request for an extension of time. Appellant’s response is due on 

or before December 14, 2017.
_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 14th day of November, 2017.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court