alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7224

Omron Management Center of America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Electrum Mining
Limited, a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-QSB for the period
ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the Report), I, Douglas Scheving, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and result of operations of the Company.

Date: February 9th , 2006

/s/ Douglas SchevingDouglas SchevingChief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

---
Summary of Pixelworks Non-Employee Director Compensation



 Exhibit 10.1 

Summary of Pixelworks Non-Employee Director Compensation 

Cash compensation: 
  

			
	 Board Member Retainer
	  	$27,000 per year
	 Audit Committee Retainer
	  	 $8,000 per year, regular member

$16,000 per year, Chair

	 Compensation Committee Retainer
	  	 $5,000 per year, regular member

$10,000 per year, Chair

	 Nominating and Governance Committee Retainer
	  	 $3,000 per year, regular member

$6,000 per year, Chair


 Cash
compensation is paid in quarterly increments. 
 Stock Compensation Plan: 

New non-employee Board members receive an initial option award to purchase 10,000 shares of the Company’s common stock upon election or appointment
to the Board. The option has an exercise price equal to the closing price of the common stock on the grant date, and a maximum term of six years. The award vests with respect to 25% of the shares on the first anniversary of the grant date, and on a
monthly basis thereafter for the next three years. 
 Non-employee Board members who continue to serve on the Board after each annual meeting
will receive an award of 8,000 restricted share units (RSU). The RSU will vest twelve months from the date of grant, and will entitle the recipient to receive one share of the Company’s common stock for each restricted share unit. 

Other: 
 Mr. Alley’s director
compensation is determined by the CEO Transition Agreement dated and effective December 12, 2006, by and between Allen Alley and Pixelworks, Inc. (Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 12, 2007).
Exhibit 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection  with the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of Elite
Cosmetics,  Inc. for the quarter  ending April 30, 2005,  I, Glen Landry,  Chief
Executive  Officer and Chief Financial  Officer of Elite Cosmetics,  Inc. hereby
certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

1.   Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending April 30, 2005,
     fully  complies  with the  requirements  of  section  13(a) or 15(d) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in such Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the
     quarter ending April 30, 2005, fairly presents,  in all material  respects,
     the financial condition and results of operations of Elite Cosmetics, Inc.

Dated:  June 15, 2005

ELITE COSMETICS, INC.

By: /s/ Glen Landry
---------------------------
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-1471

DAN K. DUNN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WESTINGHOUSE SAVANNAH RIVER COMPANY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Aiken. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior District

Judge. (CA-97-2213-1-6BC)

Submitted: December 30, 1999 Decided: February 25, 2000

Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard E. Miley, North Augusta, South Carolina, for Appellant.

Jonathan P. Pearson, James H. Fowles, III, ELLZEY & BROOKS, L.L.C.,

Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Dan K. Dunn appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment in his former employer's favor in this employment

discrimination action. We have reviewed the parties' briefs, the

joint appendices, and the district court's opinion accepting the

recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See Dunn v. Westinghouse Savannah River Co., No. CA-97-

2213-1-6BC (D.S.C. Mar. 15, 1999). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A1871. JULIETH THOMAS v. GWINNETT HOSPITAL SYSTEM, INC.

Gwinnett Hospital System, Inc. filed an action against Julieth Thomas to

recover on an account. On February 23, 2015, the trial court entered a consent

judgment awarding Gwinnett Hospital System $964.60 in principal and $248.00 in

court costs. Thomas filed this direct appeal on March 30, 2015. We lack jurisdiction

for two reasons.

First, the discretionary appeal procedure is required where – as here – a money

judgment in an action for damages totals $10,000.00 or less. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a)

(6); Hill v. Rose Electric Co., 220 Ga. App. 603 (469 SE2d 844) (1996). Second,

Thomas’s notice of appeal was untimely, asit wasfiled 35 days after entry of the final

order. See OCGA § 5-6-38 (a) (notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry

of the challenged decision). For these reasons, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for

lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

06/09/2015

June 09, 2015
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5286 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5286

To prohibit the Secretary of Veterans Affairs from transmitting certain 
   information to the Department of Justice for use by the national 
               instant criminal background check system.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 25, 2023

 Mr. Roy (for himself, Mr. Crane, Mr. Gooden of Texas, Mr. Clyde, Mr. 
  Harris, and Mrs. Miller of Illinois) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the Secretary of Veterans Affairs from transmitting certain 
   information to the Department of Justice for use by the national 
               instant criminal background check system.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Defending Veterans' Second Amendment 
Rights Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS TRANSMITTAL OF 
              CERTAIN INFORMATION TO THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FOR USE 
              BY THE NATIONAL INSTANT CRIMINAL BACKGROUND CHECK SYSTEM.

    The Secretary of Veterans Affairs may not transmit to any entity in 
the Department of Justice, for use by the national instant criminal 
background check system established under section 103 of the Brady 
Handgun Violence Prevention Act, personally identifiable information on 
veterans and other beneficiaries, solely on the basis of a 
determination by the Secretary under chapter 11 of title 38, United 
States Code, that a person has a service-connected disability.
                                 <all>
```
pensecos8may-10exh104.htm


EXHIBIT 10.4


 




 


FORM OF


PERFORMANCE AWARD AGREEMENT


FOR THE PENSECO FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION


2008 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN







This Performance Award Agreement is provided to [____________] (the “Participant”) by Penseco Financial Services Corporation (the “Company”) as of [____________] (the “Date of Grant”), the date the Committee awarded the Participant a performance award pursuant to the Penseco Financial Services Corporation 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2008 Plan”), subject to the terms and conditions of the 2008 Plan and this Award Agreement:








	
1.

	
Number of Shares Subject to Your Performance Award:  [______] shares of Common Stock, subject to adjustment as may be necessary pursuant to Article 7.3 of the 2008 Plan.







 




	
2.

	
Date of Grant:  [________________[













	
3.

	
Performance Period:  [insert]







 




	
4.

	
Performance Criteria:  [insert]















	
5.

	
No Right of Continued Employment or Service.  Nothing in this Award Agreement will interfere with or limit in any way the right of the Company or any affiliate to terminate your employment or service at any time, nor confer upon you any right to continue in the employ or service of the Company or any affiliate.













	
6.

	
Payment of Taxes.  Upon expiration of the Performance Period and prior to the delivery of the Common Stock, you will be required to pay all appropriate tax withholdings on the value of the Common Stock delivered to you.













	
7.

	
Plan Controls.  The terms contained in the 2008 Plan are incorporated into and made a part of this Award Agreement and this Award Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the 2008 Plan.  In the event of any actual or alleged conflict between the provisions of the Plan and the provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of the Plan will control.













	
8.

	
Severability.  If any one or more of the provisions contained in this Agreement is deemed to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the other provisions of this Agreement will be construed and enforced as if the invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision had never been included in this Agreement.













	
9.

	
Successors.  This Award Agreement shall be binding upon any successor of the Company, in accordance with the terms of this Award Agreement and the 2008 Plan.















































 









  





  











  








IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Penseco Financial Services Corporation, acting by and through the Committee, has caused this Award Agreement to be executed as of the Date of Grant set forth above.


 




	 	PENSECO FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
By: 

	 	 
	 	 	On behalf of the Committee	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 









 


Accepted by Participant:












___________________________


[Insert Name]







___________________________


Date
FIRST
AMENDMENT TO NOTE

    


    This First Addendum (the “Addendum”) to
the Promissory Note (the “Note”), dated as of March 2, 2009, in the original
principal amount of up to $750,000 made by is by Saker Aviation Services, Inc.
(f/k/a FirstFlight, Inc.), a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) to EuroAmerican
Investment Corp., a New York corporation (the “Holder”), is entered into as of
this 5th day of
May, 2010.

    


    WHEREAS, the Maturity Date (as defined
in the Note) of the Note is February 27, 2011;

    


    WHEREAS, the Holder and the Company
have agreed to extend the Maturity Date to March 1, 2012;

    


    NOW THEREFORE, for $100 and other good
and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

    


    1.           The
Note shall be deemed amended such that the “Maturity Date” shall mean March 1,
2012.

    


    2.           Except
as otherwise specifically provided for herein, the terms of the Note shall be
unmodified and shall remain in full force and effect.

    


    


    [SIGNATURES
TO THIS ADDENDUM APPEAR ON

    THE
FOLLOWING PAGE]

     

    
      
         

      

      
         

        
          

        

      

      
         

      

    

    


    IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Addendum as of the day first
above written.

     

    
      
        	 
      	
                EUROAMERICAN
      INVESTMENT CORP.

              
	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
                By:
      ______________________________

              
	 
      	
                Name:
      William B. Wachtel

              
	 
      	
                Title:
      President

              
	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
                SAKER
      AVIATION SERVICES, INC.

              
	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
                By:
      _______________________________

              
	 
      	
                Name:
      Ronald Ricciardi

              
	 
      	
                Title:
      President and CEO

              


      

    

     

    The
undersigned guarantors of the Note hereby consent to the extension set forth
herein.

    


    ______________________

    William
B. Wachtel

    


    


    ______________________

    Alvin S.
Trenk
**Exhibit21.1**

# **Subsidiariesof Registrant**

| SUBSIDIARY                                                | ** ** | **JURISDICTION  OF INCORPORATION**   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------------------------|
|                                                      |       |                                 |
|  Cymer B.V.                                          |       | the Netherlands                      |
|  Cymer Japan, Inc.                                   |       | Japan                                |
|  Cymer Korea, Inc.                                   |       | Korea                                |
|  Cymer Singapore Pte. Ltd.                           |       | Singapore                            |
|  Cymer Southeast Asia, Ltd.                          |       | Taiwan                               |
|  Cymer Semiconductor Equipment (Shanghai)  Co., Ltd. |       | the People’s Republic  of China |
|  TCZ Pte. Ltd.                                       |       | Singapore                            |

 

----
Exhibit
32.2
















Principal
Financial Officer’s Certification Pursuant To


Section
1350


(furnished,
not filed)














In
connection with the Annual Report of GeoGlobal Resources Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-KSB/A for the year ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Allan J. Kent, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1)  The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and





2)  The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Allan J.
Kent








Allan J.
Kent


Chief
Financial Officer


June 3,
2008
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 77 (Friday, April 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 19956]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9919]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Santa Fe National Historic Trail Advisory Council; Meeting

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, that a meeting of the Santa Fe 
National Historic Trail Advisory Council will be held May 11-12, 1995, 
at 8:15 a.m., in the Best Western Silver Spur, 1510 W. Wyatt Earp, 
Business Highway 50, Dodge City, Kansas.
    The Santa Fe National Historic Trail Advisory Council was 
established pursuant to Public Law 90-543 establishing the Santa Fe 
National Historic Trail to advise the National Park Service on such 
issues as preservation of trail routes and features, public use, 
standards for posting and maintaining trail markers, as well as 
administrative matters.
    The matters to be discussed include:

--Review of interpretive planning matters.
--Cultural resources management.
--Fundraising proposals.
--Status of certification projects and agreements with cooperators.
--Historical research projects.

    The meeting will be open to the public. However, facilities and 
space for accommodating members of the public are limited, and persons 
will be accommodated on a first-come, first-served basis. Any member of 
the public may file a written statement concerning the matters to be 
discussed with David Gaines, Superintendent.
    Persons wishing further information concerning this meeting, or who 
wish to submit written statements may contact David Gaines, 
Superintendent, Long Distance Trails Group Office-Santa Fe, National 
Park Service, P.O. Box 728, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87504-0728, telephone 
505/988-6888. Minutes of the meeting will be available for public 
inspection four weeks after the meeting at the office of the 
Superintendent, located in Room 358, Pinon Building, 1220 South St. 
Francis Drive, Santa Fe, New Mexico.

    Dated: April 6, 1995.
Jerry L. Rogers,
Regional Director, Southwest Region.
[FR Doc. 95-9919 Filed 4-20-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
**EXHIBIT 31.02**

**Rule13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications**

I, Barbra E. Kocsis,certify that:

1. I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-Q of ML Winton FuturesAccess LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)  Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,of internal control over financial reporting to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

a)  All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: November 14, 2006                      |                 |
|----------------------------------------------|----------------------|
|                                         |
| By                                           | /s/ BARBRA E. KOCSIS |   |   |
| Barbra E. Kocsis                             |
| Chief Financial Officer                      |
| (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|                                              |                      |  |  |  |

 

1

----