alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Henrich *et al. v.*Whittaker.

No. 3038.

November 25, 1922.

Injunction. Before Judge Shurley. Lincoln superior court. November 23, 1921.

*Norman & Norman*and *Colley & Colley,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Clement E.*Sutton, contra.

Hill, J.

A petition for injunction and other equitable relief was filed, returnable to the July term, 1921, of the superior court. At that term a demurrer to the petition was filed. On October 24, 1921, during the October term, 1921, of said court, an order was taken providing for a hearing on the demurrer in vacation on November 10, 1921, at Washington, Georgia. On that date this question was submitted to the judge on the pleadings. Thereafter, on November 23, 1921, the judge, without passing upon the demurrer, rendered a decision granting an interlocutory injunction restraining the plaintiff' as prayed; and also granting the final relief prayed by the plaintiff. *Held,*that the judge was only authorized, under the order taken, to pass upon the demurrer at the date of the hearing in vacation, and that he erred in passing an interlocutory injunction, and in granting in vacation the other relief prayed.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
#### L.T. THOMAS, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 41569.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Aug. 15, 1989.

L.T. Thomas, Mineral Point, pro se.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before GAITAN, P.J., and MANFORD and ULRICH, JJ.

MANFORD, Judge.

This appeal is presented pro se following a hearing upon a Rule 29.15 motion wherein movant was represented by counsel. The hearing court denied relief.

This appeal is dismissed for the following reasons:

There is no jurisdictional statement, no statement of facts, and no points relied upon. Presentment of the appeal violates Rule 30.06 and Rule 84.04. In addition, movant presented 42 various claims in his motion which involved trial error and ineffectiveness of counsel. The trial errors are not cognizable by a Rule 29.15 motion. The claims of ineffectiveness of counsel were previously addressed by direct appeal. There remains nothing for this court to review.

Appeal dismissed.

All concur.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2991

C&K Components, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
#### Gerald VANDERFORD and Trixie Vanderford, Respondents, v. CAMERON MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.

No. WD 49335.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

March 7, 1995.

Allen Slater, Overland Park, Kan., for appellant.

Robert 0. Jester, Kansas City, for respondents.

Before SPINDEN, P.J., and ULRICH and SMART, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Cameron Mutual Insurance Company appeals the judgment of the trial court holding it liable for satisfaction of a loss resulting from the collapse of its insureds’ silo and for vexatious refusal to pay. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 77 (Friday, April 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19959-19960]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9923]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Office of the Secretary


Agency Recordkeeping/Reporting Requirements Under Review by the 
Office of Management and Budget (OMB)

April 18, 1995.
    The Department of Labor has submitted the following public 
information collection request (ICR) to the Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act 
(44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) of 1980, as amended (Pub. L. 96-511). Copies may 
be obtained by calling the Department of Labor Departmental Clearance 
Officer, Kenneth A. Mills ((202) 219-5095). Comments and questions 
about the ICRs listed below should be directed to Mr. Mills, Office of 
Information Resources Management Policy, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 
Constitution Avenue, NW., [[Page 19960]] Room N-1301, Washington, DC 
20210. Comments should also be sent to the Office of Information and 
Regulatory Affairs, Attn: OMB Desk Officer for the Bureau of Labor 
Statistics, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10325, Washington, DC 
20503 ((202) 395-7316).
    Individuals who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TTY/
TDD) may call (202) 219-4720 between 1:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. Eastern 
time, Monday through Friday.

Type of Review: Reinstatement
Agency: Bureau of Labor Statistics
Title: Current Point of Purchase Survey Computer Assisted Telephone 
Interview
OMB Number: 1220-0140
Frequency: Quarterly
Affected Public: Individuals or households
Number of Respondents: 17,583
Estimated Time Per Respondent: 12.6 minutes
Total Burden Hours: 3,696
Description: The Current Point of Purchase Survey (CPP), Computer 
Assisted telephone Interview (CATI) is used to develop and maintain a 
timely list of retail, wholesale, and service establishments (outlets) 
where people shop. The list of outlets produced from the survey serves 
as a sampling frame from which the Bureau of Labor Statistics selects 
places to price items in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) market basket. 
The 1995-1996 CPP/CATI survey data are necessary to obtain a list of 
outlets for new and redefined items that will be introduced to the CPI 
market basket for the 1998 revised index.
Theresa M. O'Malley,
Acting Departmental Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-9923 Filed 4-20-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-24-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996<F4>
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                              18
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       75
<ALLOWANCES>                                         3
<INVENTORY>                                        105
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   234
<PP&E>                                           1,180
<DEPRECIATION>                                     723
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     737
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              204
<BONDS>                                            138<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             3<F2>
<OTHER-SE>                                         220
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       737
<SALES>                                          1,144
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,144
<CGS>                                            1,062
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,115
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (2)<F3>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     1
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  11
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     21
<INCOME-TAX>                                         9
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 12
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        12
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.50
<FN>
<F1>Total long-term debt
<F2>Does not include additional-paid-in-capital
<F3>Includes other expense and interest income
<F4>Restated to reflect EPS under SFAS 128
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-6312

PEER Bearing Company: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 70 (Wednesday, April 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 18598]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8933]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. GT95-30-000]


Northern Natural Gas Co., Notice of Distribution of Refunds Paid

April 6, 1995.
    Take notice that on March 21, 1995, Northern Natural Gas Company 
(Northern) submitted worksheets reflecting the distribution of refunds 
paid to jurisdictional sales customers on March 21, 1995. Northern 
states that these refunds are being made pursuant to the Commission's 
Order in Colorado Interstate Gas Company, Docket Nos. GP83-11-002 and 
RI83-9-003 issued December 1, 1993.
    The Commission ordered that ``any first seller that collected 
revenues in excess of the applicable maximum lawful price established 
by the NGPA as a result of the reimbursement of the Kansas ad valorem 
taxes for sales on or after June 28, 1988, shall refund any such excess 
revenues to the purchaser . . . ''. The Interstate pipelines were then 
required to make lump-sum cash payments of the Kansas ad valorem tax 
refunds to the customers who were actually overcharged. Included with 
Northern's payments is interest covering the period from the date 
Northern received the refund from the producer until March 21, 1995.
    Northern states that a copy of this report is being mailed to each 
of * * * Northern's affected jurisdictional sales customers.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, DC 
20426, in accordance with Sections 385.211 and 385.214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). 
All such motions or protests should be filed on or before April 13, 
1995. Protests will be considered by the commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make Protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-8933 Filed 4-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Mark A. Frey, Respondent.

Order unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Because there was insufficient corroboration of the accomplice’s testimony, the trial court properly dismissed the third count of the indictment charging defendant with criminal possession of stolen property in the second degree *(see, People v Moses,*63 NY2d 299, 305-306; *People v Marmulstein,*109 AD2d 948, 949; *People v Nieto,*97 AD2d 774, 775). The People’s remaining contentions do not require reversal. (Appeal from order of Monroe County Court, Celli, J.—vacate conviction.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Green, Lawton and Lowery, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BARNETT INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,
2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                               JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                 JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             9,703
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     39,712
<ALLOWANCES>                                       1,983
<INVENTORY>                                       61,220
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 113,601
<PP&E>                                            45,885
<DEPRECIATION>                                    20,939
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   170,002
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             30,418
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                             163
<OTHER-SE>                                       106,421
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     170,002
<SALES>                                          281,471
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 281,471
<CGS>                                            189,273
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    189,273
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  65,056
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     979
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 1,892
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   24,516
<INCOME-TAX>                                       9,844
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               14,672
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                      14,672
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0.90
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.90



</TABLE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6008

Kyungshin Lear Sales and Engineering LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

“Made in China 2025” or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
<PAGE>
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 12
                                                         Form 10-K for 1995
                                                           File No. 1-11237


                            AT&T CAPITAL CORPORATION
                       COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO
                                  FIXED CHARGES
                             (Dollars in Thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Year Ended December 31,     1995       1994      1993       1992      1991
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                       <C>       <C>        <C>      <C>        <C>
Earnings from continuing
 operations:

  Income before
   income taxes
   and extraordinary
   loss                   $208,239  $173,614  $138,040  $114,875  $ 82,559

  Deduct undistributed
   earnings on equity
   investments, net of
   losses                        -         -         -         -       (14)

  Add fixed charges
   included in income
   before income taxes
   and cumulative effect
   of accounting change    418,624   277,913   242,100   258,312   279,926
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Total earnings from
 continuing
 operations, as
 adjusted                 $626,863  $451,527  $380,140  $373,187  $362,471
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Total fixed charges*      $418,624  $277,913  $242,100  $258,312  $279,926

Ratio of earnings
 to fixed charges             1.50      1.62      1.57      1.44      1.29
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>


        * Fixed charges include interest on indebtedness, preferred stock
        dividends and the portion of rentals representative of the interest
        factor.




                                    1
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6332

CW Bearing USA, Inc:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Dimeco, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending
December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, we, Gary C. Beilman, Chief Executive Officer, and Maureen H. Beilman, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                        |  | 
|/s/ Gary C. Beilman     |  |  |  | /s/ Maureen H. Beilman 
|Gary C. Beilman         |  |  |  | Maureen H. Beilman     
|Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer

Date: March 20, 2008
Exhibit 32.2




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly report of Petramerica Oil, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin
Pickard, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



                                                     /s/ Kevin Pickard
                                                     ----------------------
                                                     Kevin Pickard
                                                     Chief Financial Officer



<PAGE>