alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ex parte Bernard Francis BAHMER, Applicant.

No. 05-86-00032-CR.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas.

Feb. 21, 1986.

Jack E. Walter, Lawrence B. Mitchell, Dallas, for applicant.

Gary A. Moore, Asst. Dist. Atty., Dallas, for respondent.

Before GUITTARD, C.J., and DEVANY and McCLUNG, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Bernard Francis Bahmer appeals from the trial court’s order denying his writ of habeas corpus by which he sought to avoid extradition to the State of Iowa where he is charged with the offenses of kidnapping in the first degree, assault while participating in a felony and conspiracy to commit murder. In his first ground of error applicant asserts that the papers supporting the Governor’s warrant are insufficient to meet the requirements of TEX.CODE CRIM.PRQC.ANN. art. 51.13, Sec. 3 (Vernon 1979), because the information charging applicant is not supported by an affidavit. We agree, and accordingly, we reverse.

The papers supporting the Governor’s warrant show that applicant is charged in Iowa by information. Under art. 51.13, sec. 3, one of the methods for supporting a demand for extradition is by information supported by affidavit. Here, although the Governor’s Warrant states the contrary, the supporting papers do not contain an affidavit to support the information.

While it is not necessary that an information *be based*upon an affidavit when, under the laws of the demanding state, prosecution can be instituted on an information alone, *Ex parte Drennan,*461 S.W.2d 420, 421 (Tex.Crim.App.1971); *Ex parte Peairs,*283 S.W.2d 755, 758-59 (Tex.Crim.App.1955) (on rehearing), absent some sort of supporting affidavit the requirements of the extradition statute *of Texas*are not met. *See Peairs,*283 S.W.2d at 758; *see also, Ex parte Robbins,*575 S.W.2d 27, 29 (Tex.Crim.App.1978); *Ex parte Blankenship,*651 S.W.2d 430, 431 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1983, pet. ref’d). Because no supporting affidavit is contained in the supporting papers, the demand for extradition should not have been recognized. Extradition should not have been authorized until the required instruments were furnished by the demanding state.

Since we sustain applicant’s first ground of error, we do not reach his second and third grounds of error challenging the constitutionality of the Dallas County Magistrates Act. *See Ex parte Salfen,*618 S.W.2d 766, 770 (Tex.Crim.App.1981). The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.
Exhibit
31.1





CERTIFICATIONS





I,
Gregory Lykiardopoulos certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Triton Distribution Systems,
Inc.:





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.








Date:
      November 14, 2008
            By: 
      /s/ Gregory
      LykiardopoulosGregory
      LykiardopoulosChief
      Executive Officer
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5268

Arrowhead Electrical Products, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
**Exhibit 10.2**

**LEASE AGREEMENT**

GEORGIA, DECATUR COUNTY 

THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into between Martin Sublease, LLC of Decatur County, Georgia, hereinafter called Lessor

AND 

The Money Tree Inc. of Decatur County, Georgia, hereinafter called Lessee. 

WITNESSETH 

For and in consideration of the rents to be paid as hereinafter stipulated, Lessor rents, lets and leases to Lessee thefollowing described property to-wit: 

Building located at                                        ,hereinafter called “premises”. 

Upon the following terms and conditions: 

TERM 

For a term of                     years beginning                     and ending                    . 

RENT 

A monthly rent of$                     per month, cash in advance for each month, beginning                    . 

INSURANCE 

The Lessee shall carry insurance on the building in an amount equal to the appraisal or market value of said property.Insurance must be sufficient to insure Lessor against any financial loss. Said insurance premiums shall be paid by the Lessee. Lessee shall be liable for and shall hold Lessor harmless in respect of damage or injury to the leased property, or theperson or property of Lessee, or the person or property of Lessee’s other guests, family members, licensees, customers or anyone else, if due to act or neglect of Lessee or anyone in Lessee’s control. 

TAXES 

All taxes are to be paid by the Lessee. 

IMPROVEMENTS 

Lessee shall not make improvements or alterations upon premises without written authorization of Lessor. Lessee shall beresponsible for all repairs to the premises. 

PARTIES 

This Agreement shall bind the heirs, administrators, executors, and assigns of both parties. 

WITNESS THIS DAY, the parties signed below have caused this Agreement to be executed on this                     day of                    . 

 

Signed, sealed and delivered

in the presence of:
  MARTIN SUBLEASE, LLC      Witness  
Derek Martin

Manager
     Notary Public  
Signed, sealed and delivered

in the presence of:
  THE MONEY TREE, INC.      Witness  
Brad Bellville

President
     Notary Public
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      Exhibit 23

COOPERS                           COOPERS & LYBRAND L.P.P.
& LYBRAND
                                  a professional services firm

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
NSD Bancorp, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 33-78220 and 33-78222) of our report
dated January 26, 1998, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements
of NSD Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiary, as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and for
the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996, and 1995, which report is incorporated
by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

                                                  COOPERS & LYBRAND LLP

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 
March 26, 1998
IB 

Union Calendar No. 245 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5524 

[Report No. 118–304] 

To amend the start date of the pilot program on sharing with foreign 

branches, subsidiaries and affiliates. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2023 

Ms. GARCIA of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

DECEMBER 11, 2023 

Additional sponsor: Mr. SHERMAN

DECEMBER 11, 2023 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 

House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed 

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 

[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on September 18, 2023] 


ssavage on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5524 RH

A BILL 

To amend the start date of the pilot program on sharing 

with foreign branches, subsidiaries and affiliates. 


ssavage on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5524 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Foreign Affiliates Shar5 ing Pilot Program Extension Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FOREIGN AFFILIATES SHARING PILOT PROGRAM. 

7 Section 5318(g)(8)(B)(iii) of title 31, United States 

8 Code, is amended by striking ‘‘3 years after the date of en9 actment of this paragraph’’ and inserting ‘‘3 years after 

10 the date on which the Secretary of the Treasury issues rules 

11 pursuant to subparagraph (A)’’. 


ssavage on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 245 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5524 

[Report No. 118–304] 

A BILL 

To amend the start date of the pilot program on 

affiliates. sharing with foreign branches, subsidiaries and 

DECEMBER 11, 2023 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Comand ordered to be printed mittee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, 


ssavage on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 76 (Thursday, April 20, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 19792]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9765]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50-275 and 50-323]


Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Notice of Partial Denial of 
Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Opportunity for Hearing

    The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has denied 
a portion of the request by Pacific Gas and Electric Company (the 
licensee) for amendments to Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-80 and 
DPR-82 issued to the licensee for operation of the Diablo Canyon 
Nuclear Power Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, located in San Luis Obispo 
County, California. Notice of Consideration of Issuance of these 
amendments was published in the Federal Register on October 12, 1994 
(59 FR 51621).
    The purpose of this portion of the license amendment request was to 
eliminate the minimum refueling water storage tank solution temperature 
from Technical Specifications (TS) Sections 3/4.1.2.5 and 3/4.5.5.
    The NRC staff has concluded that the licensee's request cannot be 
granted. The licensee was notified of the Commission's denial of the 
proposed change by a letter dated April 14, 1995.
    By May 22, 1995, the licensee may demand a hearing with respect to 
the denial described above. Any person whose interest may be affected 
by this proceeding may file a written petition for leave to intervene.
    A request for hearing or petition for leave to intervene must be 
filed with the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 
Commission, Washington, DC 20555, Attention: Docketing and Services 
Branch, or may be delivered to the Commission's Public Document Room, 
the Gelman Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC by the above 
date.
    A copy of any petitions should also be sent to the Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 
20555, and to Christopher J. Warner, Esq., Pacific Gas and Electric 
Company, P.O. Box 7442, San Francisco, California 94120, attorney for 
the licensee.
    For further details with respect to this action, see (1) the 
application for amendment dated August 17, 1994, and (2) the 
Commission's letter to the licensee dated April 14, 1995.
    These documents are available for public inspection at the 
Commission's Public Document Room, the Gelman Building, 2120 L Street, 
NW., Washington, DC, and at the local public document room located at 
the California Polytechnic State University, Robert E. Kennedy Library, 
Government Documents and Maps Department, San Luis Obispo, California 
93407.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 14th day of April 1995.

    For The Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
William H. Bateman,
Director, Project Directorate IV-2, Division of Reactor Projects III/
IV, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 95-9765 Filed 4-19-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.1

                              ADZONE RESEARCH, INC.
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of AdZone Research, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles Cardona, Chief
Executive Officer, Acting Chief Financial Officer and Director of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to AdZone Research, Inc. and will be retained by AdZone Research, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

Date: November 1, 2004


/s/ Charles Cardona
----------------------
Name: Charles Cardona
Title: Chief Executive Officer
and Acting Chief Financial Officer
#### Carl CLAYTON, Appellant, v. Roberta CLAYTON, Respondent.

No. WD 49389.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Dec. 20, 1994.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 31, 1995.

Brace C. Jackson, Jr., Jason M. Pottinger, Kansas City, for appellant.

David R. Buchanan, Lawrence P. War-shaw, Brown & James, Kansas City, for respondent.

Before FENNER, C.J., and HANNA and STITH, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from judgment of the trial court granting summary judgment for defendant.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 76 (Thursday, April 20, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 19822]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9821]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


Indian Gaming

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of approved Tribal-State compact.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 2710, of the Indian Gaming Regulatory 
Act of 1988 (Pub. L. 100-497), the Secretary of the Interior shall 
publish, in the Federal Register, notice of approved Tribal-State 
Compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III (casino) gambling on 
Indian reservations. The Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs, 
Department of the Interior, through her delegated authority, has 
approved the Tribal-State Compact between the Miami Tribe of Oklahoma 
and the State of Oklahoma, which was executed on June 10, 1994.

DATES: This action is effective April 20, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George T. Skibine, Director, Indian 
Gaming Management Staff, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Washington, D.C. 
20240, (202) 219-4068.

    Dated: April 7, 1995.
Ada E. Deer,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 95-9821 Filed 4-19-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-02-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM                        .                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         June 3, 2021.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on May 14, 2021, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 700 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2021-92, CP2021-95.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2021-11701 Filed 6-2-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i at e f orpubl i c at i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane lunani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T M I CH A EL LEV EN S CA TH ER, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , Jr ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 05- 74508 A ge nc yN o. A 008- 914- 163 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r atio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r13, 2010 ** B efo re: S IL V E R M A N , C A L L A H A N , an dN . R . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. M i c h a e lLe v e n s Cath e r , an at i v e an dc i t i z e n o f th e U n i t e dK i n g d o m, p e titio n s f

o rr e v ie w o f

th e B o ar do f

I m m ig r atio n A p p e a ls ’ o r d e rd is m is s in g h is appealfr om an i m m i grat i on j ud ge’ s r em ov alorder. W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 8 U . S . C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e rev i ew d e n o v o qu est i o n s o f l aw an dco n st i tu t i o n alcl ai m s, 

# FI LED SEP 27 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS05- 74508 2 Kha n v. H

older , 584 F . 3d 773, 776 ( 9th C i r . 2009) , and w e de nythe pe t i t i on f or r e v ie w . C a th e rd o e s n o t c h a lle n g e th e a g e n c y ’s d e te rm in atio n th at h e is r e m o v ab le unde r8 U . S . C . § 1227( a ) ( 2) ( A ) ( i i i ) ba s e d on hi s tw o 1992 c onvi c t i ons f orl e w d or l as ci vi ou s a ct s w i th a chi l d u nd er14 ye ar s of a ge i n v i ol at i on of C al i forni a P enal C o d e § 2 8 8 ( a ) . T he agency det erm i ned thatC ather i s i nel i gi bl e f or re l i ef un der f orm er s e c t i on 212( c ) , 8 U . S . C . § 1182( c ) ( r e pe a l e d 1996) , be c aus e hi s gr ound of r e m o v ab ilityla c k s as tatu to ryc o u n te rp art in ag r o u n do f in a d m is s ib ility . See 8 C .F .R . § 1 2 1 2 .3 ( f

) ( 5 ) . C ath e r ’s le g a l an dc o n s titu tio n a l c h a lle n g e s to th is d et erm i n at i o n are fo recl o sedb y A bebe v. Mukasey , 5 5 4 F .3 d1 2 0 3 , 1 2 0 7 , 1 2 0 8 n .7 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ) ( e n b an c ) ; see a l so Ara g o n -Ay o n v . I

NS , 2 0 6 F .3 d8 4 7 , 8 5 3 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 0 ) ( “W e ar e s atis f ie dth at C o n g r e s s in te n d e dth e 1 9 9 6 am e n d m e n ts to m ake the aggravat ed fe l on y def i ni t i on appl y r etroac t i vel y t o al ldefi ned o ff ense s w h e n e v e rc o m m itte d .” ) . I n l i ghtof

ourdi s pos i t i on, w e ne e d nota ddr e s s C athe r ’ s r e m a i ni ng c o n te n tio n s . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
v185070_ex10-1 -- Converted by SECPublisher 2.1.1.8, created by BCL Technologies Inc., for SEC Filing


    
      Exhibit
10.1