alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 69 (Tuesday, April 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 18410]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8859]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Dkt. C-3561]


Gorayeb Seminars, Inc., et al.; Prohibited Trade Practices, and 
Affirmative Corrective Actions

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION: Consent Order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In settlement of alleged violations of Federal law prohibiting 
unfair acts and practices and unfair methods of competition, this 
consent order prohibits, among other things, two New Jersey-based 
companies and their officers from making any representation about the 
relative or absolute performance or efficacy of any smoking cessation 
or weight loss program, unless they possess and rely upon competent and 
reliable scientific evidence to substantiate the representation.

DATES: Complaint and Order issued March 3, 1995\1\.

    \1\Copies of the complaint and the Decision and Order are 
available from the Commission's Public Reference Branch, H-130, 6th 
Street & Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20580.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Matthew Daynard, FTC/H-200, Washington, DC. 20580. (202) 326-3291.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On Firday, August 5, 1994, there was 
published in the Federal Register, 59 FR 40032, a proposed consent 
agreement with analysis In the Matter of Gorayeb Siminars, Inc., et 
al., for the purpose of soliciting public comment. Interested parties 
were given sixty (60) days in which to submit comments, suggestions or 
objections regarding the proposed form of the order.

    Comments were filed and considered by the Commission. The 
Commission has ordered the issuance of the complaint in the form 
contemplated by the agreement, made its jurisdictional findings and 
entered an order to cease and desist, as set forth in the proposed 
consent agreement, in disposition of this proceeding.

(Sec. 6, 38 Stat. 721; 15 U.S.C. 46. Interprets or applies sec. 5, 
38 Stat. 719, as amended; 15 U.S.C. 45)
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-8859 Filed 4-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-4632

ECM Industries LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 78 (Monday, April 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 20075]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9975]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Idaho Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of 
the Idaho Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 1:00 
p.m. and adjourn at 5:00 p.m. on Friday, June 2, 1995, at the Double 
Tree Hotel, 475 Park Center Boulevard, Boise, Idaho 83706. The purpose 
of the meeting is to discuss law enforcement issues.
    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation 
to the Committee, should contact Committee Chairperson Gladys Esquibel, 
208-678-3838, or Philip Montez, Director of the Western Regional 
Office, 213-894-3437 (TDD 213-894-0508). Hearing-impaired persons who 
will attend the meeting and require the services of a sign language 
interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least five (5) 
working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.
    Dated at Washington, DC, April 17, 1995.
Carol-Lee Hurley
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit
[FR Doc. 95-9975 Filed 4-21-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-F
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Allen James TOBBEN, Defendant/Respondent.

No. 69254.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

April 30, 1996.

Blake R. Fischer, Asst. Pros. Atty., Franklin County, Union, for appellant.

Stephen P. Kuenzel, James W. McGetti-gan, Jr., Eckelkamp, Eckelkamp, Wood and Kuenzel, Washington, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and GRIMM, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The State of Missouri appeals the dismissal of the driving while intoxicated charge against defendant Allen James Tobben. The trial court found the prosecution of the charge violated the Double Jeopardy Clause because defendant previously had his license administratively suspended.

This case is controlled by the Missouri Supreme Court’s recent decision in *State v. Mayo,*915 S.W.2d 758 (Mo. banc 1996). There, the court held a charge of driving while intoxicated is not barred by Double Jeopardy because the defendant’s license had been administratively suspended. Thus, it reversed the trial court’s dismissal of the charge against the defendant.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 74 (Tuesday, April 18, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 19412]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9561]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Office of the Secretary


Agency Recordkeeping/Reporting Requirements Under Review by the 
Office of Management and Budget (OMB)

April 13, 1995.
    The Department of Labor has submitted the following public 
information collection request (ICR) to the Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act 
(44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) of 1980, as amended (Pub. L. 96-511). A copy may 
be obtained by calling the Department of Labor Departmental Clearance 
Officer, Kenneth A. Mills ({202} 219-5095). Comments and questions 
about this ICR should be directed to Mr. Mills, Office of Information 
Resources Management Policy, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution 
Avenue, NW., Room N-1301, Washington, DC 20210. Comments should also be 
sent to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attn: OMB 
Desk Officer for ETA, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10235, 
Washington, DC 20503 ({202} 395-7316).
    Individuals who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TTY/
TDD) may call {202} 219-4720 between 1:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. Eastern 
time, Monday through Friday.

    Type of Review: Extension.
    Agency: Employment and Training Administration.
    Title: Procedures for Classifying Labor Surplus Areas.
    OMB Number: 1205-0207.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Affected Public: Federal Government; State, Local or Tribal 
Government.
    Number of Respondents: 52.
    Estimated Time Per Respondent: 1 hour.
    Total Burden Hours: 208.
    Description: The Department of Labor issues an annual list of 
labor surplus areas (LASs) so that Federal agencies can direct 
procurement contracts to employers in high unemployment areas. The 
annual LAS list is updated during the year based on petitions 
submitted to the Department of Labor by State employment security 
agencies requesting additional areas for classification.
Theresa M. O'Malley,
Acting Departmental Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-9561 Filed 4-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


OF HEALTH
BENEFITS DIRECT CORPORATION REQUIRED


BY RULE
13a-14(b) UNDER THE EXCHANGE ACT





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Health Benefits Direct Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Anthony R. Verdi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, based on
my knowledge:





(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





May 17,
2010





/s/
      ANTHONY R. VERDIAnthony
      R. VerdiChief
      Operating Officer and Chief Financial
Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the amendment to the Annual Report of Dimeco, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, we, Gary C. Beilman, Chief Executive Officer, and Maureen H. Beilman, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Gary C. Beilman

/s/ Maureen H. BeilmanGary C. Beilman

Maureen H. BeilmanChief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer





Date:    November 23, 2010
Exhibit 10.32.1






Exhibit 10.32.1




Termination of Severance Agreement




This Termination of Severance Agreement (this “Agreement”) by and between Cortland
Bancorp, an Ohio corporation, and                      (the “Executive”),
Vice President of The Cortland Savings and Banking Company (the “Bank”), an Ohio-chartered bank and
wholly owned subsidiary of Cortland Bancorp, is made and entered into and shall be effective as of
this                      day of                     , 2010.



Whereas, Cortland Bancorp and the Executive entered into a Severance Agreement dated
as of December 3, 2008 (the “Severance Agreement”),



Whereas, Cortland Bancorp and the Executive desire now to terminate the Severance
Agreement, and



Whereas, Cortland Bancorp and the Executive intend that from and after the effective
date of this Agreement the Severance Agreement shall be void and shall have no further force or
effect.



Now Therefore, in consideration of these premises and other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Cortland Bancorp and
the Executive hereby agree as follows.



1. Termination of the Severance Agreement. Effective as of the date first written above, the
Severance Agreement is terminated and shall have no further force or effect. Neither the Executive
nor any beneficiary of the Executive shall make any claim for benefits under the Severance
Agreement. The Executive acknowledges and agrees that Cortland Bancorp and the Bank shall be fully
discharged from all liabilities or obligations under the Severance Agreement as of the effective
date of this Agreement.



2. Applicable Law. This Agreement and all rights hereunder shall be governed by the laws of
the State of Ohio, except to the extent preempted by the laws of the United States of America.



3. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement of Cortland Bancorp and
the Executive concerning the subject matter.



In Witness Whereof, the Executive and a duly authorized officer of Cortland Bancorp
have executed this Termination of Severance Agreement as of the date first written above.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Executive	 	Cortland Bancorp
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

 


	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 

	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Its:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

________________ _________________ GREGORY M. HAWES, Petitioner - Appellant,

v. MICHAEL PACHECO, Warden, Wyoming State Pen itentiary; WYOMING ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondents - Appellees. No. 18-8013 (D.C. No. 1:17-CV-00052-ABJ) (D. Wyo.)

________________ _________________ ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

________________ _________________ Before EID , KELLY , and O’BRIEN , Circuit Judges.

________________ _________________ Gregory M. Hawes filed a 28 U.S. C. § 2254 application challengi ng his Wyoming conviction fo r kidnaping. The district court dismissed one claim without prejudice for failure to exhaust and denied the other claims on the merits. This court granted a limited certificate of appealability concerning this hybrid disposition of a mixed § 2254 applicati on and ordered the pa rties to address the proper remedy.

* After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel ha s determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in t he determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is t herefore ordered submitted without oral ar gument. This order and judgme nt is not binding precedent, except under the doctr ines of law of the case, res j udicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, howev er, for its persuasive value c onsistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 a nd 10th Cir. R. 32.1. FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### September 19, 2018
Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court2 Both parties have responded, and M r. Hawes has replied to the g overnment’s response. Mr. Hawes suggests th at, notwithstanding the hybrid disposition, this court should take jurisdicti on and rule on the merits of his claims, including the unexhausted claim. But in these circumstances, we cannot consi der the merits of the habeas claims. In both Wood v. McCollum , 833 F.3d 1272, 1274 (10th Cir. 2016), and Moore v. Schoeman , 288 F.3d 1231, 1232, 1236 ( 10th Cir. 2002), we held that when a district court improperly dismisses unexhausted claims w hile ruling on the merits of exhausted claims, we must reverse and remand for the district court to decide the application in accorda nce with the precedents regard ing mixed habeas applications. Recognizi ng that we are bound by Wood and Moore , the government acknowledges that the district c ourt’s decision is improper and concedes that the matter should be remanded fo r further proceedings. As we did in Wood , we reverse the district cour t’s hybrid disposition of the § 2254 application and remand to t he district court with instru ctions to vacate its judgment and dispose of Mr. Hawes ’ petition in a manner consist ent with Moore

. Mr. Hawes’ motions to supplement the record dated August 31, 20 18, and September 7, 2018, are denied, and his ot her pending motions are denied a s moot.

Entered for the Court

Allison H. Eid Circuit Judge
572 

OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

nonorahle SldntQ Latham 

memty of state 

Austin, Xexa~ 

mar Lir. Lathapt 

ch s&l1 have .passeit WtFi 

It is well settle& that the tiae rllowed by 

canetlt~~tion%l prariainn f+oz- conslderetion of bill% ie 

a xiattbr Or priVi1e@ With the (IOT0XTka!=, rho imy w&Ye 

h%E I%$!$b 20 the full per+it ZWId veto Or RppPWe fJ 

bill within the allotted period. ;Uant v. State, 32 

Ark. 241, 7s 8. W.769, 106 A. Sti 8. 34, 2 Ann. CRR. 33, 

88 L. B.A. 71; Piokle T. m%a, 86 Tex. 3X?, 24 9. w. 

26U# 26 u. C. L. 698. 

While the Gmwnw retains a bill in hle 

papsemion and under hia oontral titNn the 8Ilottad 

pwiocl, he may moonelder hle eotion tbereonr ?mt 

ihem he apprwee ti etgns a MU, end depodte it 

with the 6wretwy eS $tote, the ef'ficial rspooitorJ 

uf t&o OSfiOiSl sate e.f the Ornemer am3 of all lam, 

he kae 'pl8oed the bill b aad Us control anl rapl net 

themaeiter rea%ll the b&l "i fWtm the Sdoretery oi 

stat&s offioe for Pua%hw ootmldwation. Peon20 

T. McGullou~ 

supra; au ii. 

(IU.) '71 Ur B. 6~8~,,pLoJcLo Y. ReColl, 

c. L. m2g 119 c. 3. mt. 

Very truly rows
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fountain Healthy Aging, Inc (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tony Jimenez, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  Date November 19, 2008   /s/ Tony Jimenez Name: Tony Jimenez Title: Chief Financial Officer Chief Executive Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

Order 

January 29, 2014

147150

GEORGE BADEEN/ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY

SITUATED and MIDWEST RECOVERY AND

ADJUSTMENT, INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v SC: 147150

COA: 302878

Wayne CC: 10-004053-CZ

PAR, INC., d/b/a PAR NORTH AMERICA,

REMARKETING SOLUTIONS, CENTERONE

FINANCIAL SERVICES, L.L.C., FIRST

NATIONAL REPOSSESSORS, INC.,

MILLENNIUM CAPITAL AND RECOVERY

CORPORATION, RENOVO SERVICES, L.L.C.,

RENAISSANCE RECOVERY SOLUTIONS,

INC., ASR NATIONWIDE, L.L.C., THE M.

DAVIS COMPANY, INC., d/b/a U.S.A. 

RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, REPOSSESSORS,

INC., AMERICAN RECOVERY SERVICE, INC.,

DIVERSIFIED VEHICLE SERVICES, INC.,

NATIONAL ASSET RECOVERY CORP.,

CONSUMER FINANCIAL SERVICES, L.L.C., TD AUTO FINANACE, L.L.C., TOYOTA MOTOR

CREDIT CORPORATION, NISSAN MOTOR

ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, SANTANDER

CONSUMER U.S.A., INC., PNC BANK, N.A., BANK

OF AMERICA, N.A., FIFTH THIRD BANK, and

THE HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

MV CONNECT, L.L.C., d/b/a IIA, L.L.C., 

GE MONEY BANK, and MANHEIM RECOVERY

SOLUTIONS,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 January 29, 2014

p0122

2

Clerk

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 11, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral 

argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.302(H)(1). 

The parties shall submit supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order 

addressing whether the defendant forwarding companies engage in “soliciting a claim for 

collection” and therefore are “collection agenc[ies]” as defined by MCL 339.901(b). The 

parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.
**EXHIBIT 32.01**

 

**Section 1350 Certification**

 

In connection with this quarterly report of ML Aspect FuturesAccess LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I, Justin C. Ferri, Chief Executive Officer, President and Manager of Merrill Lynch Alternative Investments LLC, the manager of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1. This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  May 13, 2011 |                                    |
|--------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                     |                                    |
|                     |                                    |   |
| By:                      | /s/   JUSTIN C. FERRI                   |   |
|                     | Justin   C. Ferri                       |   |
|                     | Chief   Executive Officer and President |   |
|                     | (Principal   Executive Officer)         |   |

 

----
Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



|                              |  |                                             |  |                    
|----------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------
|Parent                        |  |                                             |  |                    
|                              |  |                                            
|Dimeco, Inc.                  |  |                                             |  |                    
|Subsidiaries of Dimeco, Inc.  |  | State or OtherJurisdiction of Incorporation |  | PercentageOwnership
|                              |  |                                            
|The Dime Bank                 |  | Pennsylvania                                |  | 100%               
|                              |  |                                            
|Subsidiaries of The Dime Bank |  | State or OtherJurisdiction of Incorporation |  | PercentageOwnership
|                              |  |                                            
|TDB Insurance Services, LLC   |  | Pennsylvania                                |  | 100%
#### Steven FOERSTEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 41992.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Feb. 27, 1990.

Gregory C. Wells, Columbia, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before ULRICH, J., Presiding, and SHANGLER and TURNAGE, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from denial of Rule 27.26 motion for postconviction relief after an evidentia-ry hearing.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).