alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7563

Nima Labs, Inc: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions.

pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
BRIAN QUINN

Chief Justice

JAMES T. CAMPBELL

Justice

MACKEY K. HANCOCK

Justice

PATRICK A. PIRTLE

Justice

Court of Appeals

Seventh District of Texas

Potter County Courts Building

501 S. Fillmore, Suite 2-A

Amarillo, Texas 79101-2449

www.txcourts.gov/7thcoa.aspx

VIVIAN LONG

Clerk

MAILING ADDRESS:

P. O. Box 9540

79105-9540

(806) 342-2650

December 1, 2014

Leigh W. Davis

Attorney at Law

1901 Central Drive, Suite 708 LB 57

Bedford, TX 76021

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Andy Porter

Assistant Criminal District Attorney

401 W. Belknap

Fort Worth, TX 76196-0201

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Case Numbers: 07-13-00134-CR, 07-13-00135-CR

Trial Court Case Numbers: 1276657D, 1311302D

Style: William Perry McAllister III v. The State of Texas

Dear Counsel:

The Court this day issued an opinion and judgment in the captioned causes. 

TEX. R. APP. P. 48. 

In addition, pursuant to Texas Government Code, Sec. 51.204(b)(2), exhibits on

file with this Court, if any, will be destroyed three years after final disposition of the case

or at an earlier date if ordered by the Court. 

Very truly yours,

Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK

xc: Honorable Robb Catalano (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Thomas A. Wilder (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

FILE COPY
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Charles ANDERSON, Appellant. Charles ANDERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. WD 48569, WD 49747.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

March 21, 1995.

Gary E. Brotherton, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before KENNEDY, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and HANNA, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

The defendant appeals his conviction, following a jury trial, for kidnapping, § 565.110, RSMo 1986, for which he was sentenced as a persistent, § 558.016.3, RSMo 1986, and class X offender, § 558.019, RSMo Supp.1992, to a thirty-year term of imprisonment. He also appeals the court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion following an evidentiary hearing. The judgments of conviction and denial of Rule 29.15 motion are affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 70 (Wednesday, April 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18607-18608]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8957]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[UTU-73753]


Cyprus Plateau Mining Corporation, Willow Creek North; Utah--
Notice of Invitation To Participate in Coal Exploration Program

    Pursuant to section 2(b) of the Mineral Leasing Act of February 25, 
1920, as amended by section 4 of the Federal Coal Leasing Amendments 
Act of 1976, 90 Stat. 1083, 30 U.S.C. 201(b), and to the regulations 
adopted as Subpart 3410, title 43, Code of Federal Regulations, members 
of the public are hereby invited to participate with Cyprus Plateau 
Mining Corporation, in the proposed exploration of certain Federal coal 
deposits in the following described lands in Carbon County, Utah:

T. 12 S., R. 9 E., SLM, Utah,
    Sec. 25, All;
    Sec. 26, E2E2.
T. 12 S., R. 10 E., SLM, Utah,
    Sec. 28, NE, NENW, S2NW, S2;
    Sec. 29, N2NE, NW, NWSW, E2SE;
    Sec. 30, lots 1-4, NE, E2W2, W2SE, NESE.

    Containing 2,299.40 Acres, more or less.

    Any party electing to participate in this exploration program must 
send written notice of such election to the Bureau of Land Management, 
Utah State Office, P.O. Box 45155, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84145-0155 and 
to Ben Grimes, Cyprus Plateau Mining Corporation, P.O. Drawer PMC, 
Price, Utah 84501. Such written notice must be received within thirty 
days after publication of this notice in the Federal Register.
    Any party wishing to participate in this exploration program must 
be qualified to hold a lease under the provisions of 43 CFR 3472.1 and 
must share all cost of the exploration program. An exploration plan 
submitted by Cyprus Plateau Mining Corporation, detailing the scope and 
timing of this exploration program, is available for public review 
during normal business hours in the Public Room of the BLM State 
Office, 324 South State Street, Salt [[Page 18608]] Lake City, Utah, 
under Serial Number UTU-73753.
Robert A. Henricks,
Acting Deputy State Director, Mineral Resources.
[FR Doc. 95-8957 Filed 4-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-DQ-M
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed October 18, 2023

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D23-0603

Lower Tribunal No. F01-292

________________

Franz Rigg,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from 

the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Michelle Delancy, Judge.

Daniel A. Callahan, P.A., and Daniel A. Callahan (Fort Lauderdale), for 

appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Sandra Lipman, Senior 

Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, MILLER and LOBREE, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Affirmed. See Jones v. State, 709 So. 2d 512, 521 (Fla. 1998) (“Two 

requirements must be met in order for a conviction to be set aside on the 

basis of newly discovered evidence. First, in order to be considered newly 

discovered, the evidence ‘must have been unknown by the trial court, by the 

party, or by counsel at the time of trial, and it must appear that defendant or 

his counsel could not have known [of it] by the use of diligence.’ Torres–

Arboleda v. Dugger, 636 So. 2d 1321, 1324–25 (Fla. 1994). Second, the 

newly discovered evidence must be of such nature that it would probably 

produce an acquittal on retrial.”); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(b)(1) (providing that 

a claim for postconviction relief must be filed no later than two years after the 

judgment and sentence become final “unless it alleges that. . . the facts on 

which the claim is predicated were unknown to the movant or the movant’s 

attorney and could not have been ascertained by the exercise of due 

diligence, and the claim is made within 2 years of the time the new facts were 

or could have been discovered with the exercise of due diligence”).
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ No. 95-40268 Summary Calendar

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus KATHY LYNN WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:94-CR-62-3

_________________________________________________________________ January 16, 1996 Before JOLLY, JONES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Kathy Lynn Williams appeals her convictions of conspiracy to

possess with intent to distribute crack cocaine and possession with intent to distribute crack cocaine. She contends solely that the
evidence was insufficient to support her convictions. We have
reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties and hold that the
evidence was sufficient for a reasonable jury to find Williams-2-

guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. U nited States v. Bell , 678 F.2d 547, 549 (5th Cir. 1982)(en banc), aff'd , 462 U.S. 356 (1983).

A F F I R M E D.
#### James Anthony BROWN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. [ AXX-XX-XXXXX ]-CR.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.).

July 28, 1994.

R. Scott Shearer, Houston, for appellant.

Julie Klivert, Houston, for appellee.

Before J. CURTISS BROWN, C.J., and MURPHY and ELLIS, JJ.

OPINION

MURPHY, Justice.

Appellant was arrested for possession of a controlled substance on January 5,1993. On March 31, 1993, appellant forfeited a $20,000 bond when he failed to appear. Appellant was returned to custody and bond was set at $4,000. On October 25, 1993, appellant once again failed to appear and forfeited his bond. When he was returned to custody, the trial court set the bail at “no bail.” Appellant filed a motion to set reasonable bail, which the trial court denied. In a single point of error, appellant claims the trial court abused its discretion in denying bail. We reverse and remand to the trial court.

Bail may only be denied under the four circumstances set out in article I, section 11a of the Texas Constitution. Article I, section 11a provides in part:

> Any person (1) accused of a felony less than capital in this State, who has theretofore twice been convicted of a felony ..., after a hearing, and upon evidence substantially showing the guilt of the accused ... may be denied bail pending trial.

Appellant alleges, and the State agrees, that appellant does not fall within the circumstances set out in article I, section 11a. We conclude, therefore, that the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to set a reasonable bail. Appellant’s point of error is sustained.

The order of the trial court denying bail is reversed. The cause is remanded to the trial court to set a reasonable bail.
**EXHIBIT 32.02**

** **

**Section 1350 Certification**

** **

**Inconnection with this quarterly report of ML Aspect FuturesAccess LLC (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I,Barbra E. Kocsis, Chief Financial Officer of Merrill Lynch AlternativeInvestments LLC, the manager of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:**

** **

1.This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information containedin this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  November 12, 2009                |                  |
|----------------------------------------------|-----------------------|
|                                         |                  |
| By                                           | /s/  BARBRA E. KOCSIS |   |
| Barbra  E. Kocsis                            |                  |
| Chief  Financial Officer                     |                  |
| (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |                  |
|                                              |                       |  |

 

1

----
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 74 (Tuesday, April 18, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 19407]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9489]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Burro Management; Final Environmental Impact Statement, Lake Mead 
National Recreation Area; Record of Decision

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (P.L. 91-190 as amended), and specifically to 
regulations promulgated by the Council on Environmental Quality at 40 
CFR 1505.2, the National Park Service, Department of the Interior, has 
approved a Record of Decision for the Final Environmental Impact 
Statement on Burro Management for Lake Mead National Recreation Area, 
Arizona and Nevada.
    The National Park Service will implement the proposed action as 
identified in the Final Environmental Impact Statement for Burro 
Management, issued March 3, 1995.
    Copies of the Record of Decision may be obtained from the 
Superintendent, Lake Mead National Recreation Area, 601 Nevada Highway, 
Boulder City, Nevada 89005; or by calling the park at (702) 293-8949.

    Dated: April 5, 1995.
Patricia L. Neubacher,
Regional Director, Western Region.
[FR Doc. 95-9489 Filed 4-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
EXHIBIT
32





CERTIFICATION


OF


CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AND


CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I,
Richard Man Fai LEE, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q/A of China Premium Lifestyle Enterprise, Inc. for the quarter ended June
30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of China Premium Lifestyle Enterprise,
Inc.




I, Joseph
Tik Tung WONG, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q/A of China Premium Lifestyle Enterprise, Inc. for the quarter ended June
30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of China Premium Lifestyle Enterprise,
Inc.




May
      28, 2010
            By:
            /s/ Richard Man Fai LEERichard Man Fai LEEChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)May
      28, 2010
            By:
            /s/ Joseph Tik Tung WONGJoseph Tik Tung WONGChief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary(Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer)





This
certification accompanies the Form 10-Q/A to which it relates, is not
deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of China Premium Lifestyle Enterprise,
Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the
Form 10-Q/A), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained
in such filing.
**EXHIBIT31.02**

**Rule13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications**

I, Barbra E.Kocsis, certify that:

1. Ihave reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of ML Cornerstone FuturesAccess LLC;

2. Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)  Disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, of internal control over financial reporting to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b) Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 14, 2007
| By                                            | /s/ BARBRA E.  KOCSIS |   |
|-----------------------------------------------|-----------------------|--------|
| Barbra E. Kocsis                              |
| Chief Financial  Officer                      |
| (Principal Financial  and Accounting Officer) |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BEYOND.COM CORPORATION FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          29,092
<SECURITIES>                                    57,867
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,863
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,107)
<INVENTORY>                                        729
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               131,829
<PP&E>                                          11,344
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,319)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 261,143
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           38,571
<BONDS>                                         63,250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       295,262
<OTHER-SE>                                   (135,998)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   261,143
<SALES>                                         36,599
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,599
<CGS>                                           32,285
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                42,270
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 174
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (37,782)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (37,782)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (37,782)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (1.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7497

A.W. Chesterton Company:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
3XEOLF9HUVLRQRI%&,

380392/87(&$67,1*35(6685(&217$,1,1*67$,1/(66



3,$==$52%(57

35,&(3803&203$1<

2WKHU

12

3XEOLF9HUVLRQRI%&,
 

<(6

12

 .*

 .*

,03257,1*7+,63$57)520&+,1$&2676

385&+$6,1*5$:0$7(5,$/$1'0$&+,1,1*,7'20(67,&$//<&267