alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-7274

Nissan North America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
#### Barbara Ann WILEY, Respondent, v. James Everette WILEY, Appellant.

No. WD 48501.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

May 17, 1994.

Beverly J. Figg, Jefferson City, for appellant.

Barbara Wiley, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before HANNA, P.J., and BRECKENRIDGE and ELLIS, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Husband appeals the division of marital property in a dissolution decree, contesting the trial court’s treatment of the wife’s school teacher retirement benefits.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit
      32





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I,
      Gregory Lykiardopoulos, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
      Report of Triton Distribution Systems, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal
      quarter ended March 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
      contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all
      material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Triton
      Distribution Systems, Inc.


Date:
        May 15, 2007      By:
/s/ Gregory
        Lykiardopoulos
 Gregory
        Lykiardopoulos
 Chief Executive
        Officer


I,
      Michael W. Overby, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
      Report of Triton Distribution Systems, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal
      quarter ended March 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
      contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all
      material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Triton
      Distribution Systems, Inc.








Date:
      May 15, 2007      By:
/s/
      Michael W.
      Overby


Michael
      W. Overby


Chief Financial
      Officer
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





**Exhibit
      32.2**




Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63
      of
      Title 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer of Finlay Fine
      Jewelry Corporation (the “Company”) does hereby certify with respect to the
      Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended February 2,
      2008
      (the “Report”) that:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and


2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




Date:
      April 17, 2008


/s/
                  Bruce E. ZurlnickBruce
                  E. ZurlnickSenior
                  Vice President, Treasurer
                and
                  Chief Financial Officer


The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United
      States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
      disclosure document.
#### INVESTORS TITLE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Mary K. GILLILAND, Respondent.

No. 67902.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

April 16, 1996.

James V. Lankford, St. Charles, for appellant.

Brainerd W. Latourette, II, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before CRAHAN, P.J., and CRANDALL and DOWD, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Investors Title Co. appeals a final judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County entered in favor of Respondent Mary K. Gilliland in an action for restitution involving payment of property taxes. Appellant complains the judgment was unsupport*142ed by the evidence and contradicts existing case law. We have reviewed the briefs and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
#### Bobby ROBERTS, *et al.,*Petitioners *v.*Sharon PRIEST, Secretary of State, Respondent *v.*John Hoyle, *et al.,*Intervenors

98-1052

979 S.W.2d 453

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered November 12, 1998

*138
      *Friday, Eldredge & Clark,*by: *Elizabeth Robben Murray, Robert S. Shafer,*and *Ellen M. Owens,*for petitioner.

*Winston Bryant,*Att’y Gen., by: *Tim Humphries,*Ass’t Att’y Gen., for respondent.

*Oscar Stilley,*for intervenors.

Per Curiam.

Presently pending in this matter is the obligation to pay the costs of the master’s fact-finding and the cost of the court reporter for transcription of the three-day hearing conducted by the master. The master, the Honorable Jack L. Lessenberry, was appointed as a fact-finder by per curiam order of this court dated September 11, 1998. *See Roberts v. Priest,*334 Ark. 244, 973 S.W.2d 797 (1998). On that same date, we required petitioner’s counsel and intervenor’s counsel each to post a bond for costs in the amount of $1,000. *Id.*Pursuant to Ark. Sup. Ct. Rule 6-5, which deals with an original action and the costs incurred by a master’s taking of evidence, we have held that the master’s hearing and the transcript of it are for the mutual benefit of the parties. *See Bailey v. McCuen,*319 Ark. 369, 370, 891 S.W.2d 797 (1995). Accordingly, we hold that the real parties in interest, the petitioner and the intervenor, shall share equally the obligation of costs. The respondent, Sharon Priest, Secretary of State, is not subject to payment of costs because of sovereign immunity. *Id.*at 369. After being credited with the $1,000 bond amount for their share of the $4,682.50 master’s bill and the $2,788.50 reporter’s bill, petitioner is directed to pay $2,735.50 into the registry of this court. Likewise, the intervenor is directed to pay $2,735.50 into the registry of this court.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lucas Energy, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Donald L. Sytsma, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/Donald L. SytsmaDonald L. SytsmaChief Financial OfficerAugust 14, 2009



---
#### David C. WOODS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 40896.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

May 16, 1989.

Joseph H. Locascio, Sp. Public Defender, Daniel C. Miller, Asst. Sp. Public Defender, Mark R. Bollinger, Kansas City, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before KENNEDY, C.J., and NUGENT and LOWENSTEIN, JJ.

*485ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from denial of Rule 27.26 motion for post-conviction relief.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
EXHIBIT 99.2

Station Casinos, Inc.
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sections 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certify as
follows:

Dated:
March 27, 2003

| |  | /s/GLENN C. CHRISTENSONGlenn C. Christenson
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and
Chief Administrative Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7645

United Scope LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_05.09.19.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Accentia Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form
10-Q), I, Francis E. ODonnell, Jr., Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Dated: May 13, 2011



|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Francis E. ODonnell, Jr.                           
|Francis E. ODonnell, Jr., M.D.                         
|Chief Executive Officer; Chairman of the Board; Director

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of
Accentia Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6938

United Scope LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_05.09.19.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
**EXHIBIT 32.02**

 

**Section 1350Certification**

 

In connection with this quarterly report of ML Aspect FuturesAccess LLC(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I,Barbra E. Kocsis, Chief Financial Officer of Merrill Lynch AlternativeInvestments LLC, the manager of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Date:November 12, 2010

 
| By:    | /s/  BARBRA E. KOCSIS                         |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Barbra  E. Kocsis                             |   |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer                      |   |
|   | (Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer) |   |

 

----
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Charles SANDERS, Appellant.

No. WD 49573.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

June 20, 1995.

Lew Kollias, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Traci J. Sanders, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before HANNA, P.J., and BERREY and SPINDEN, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Charles Sanders appeals his convictions of two counts of selling a controlled substance, a class B felony. The trial court sentenced Sanders to seven-year sentences for each count, to run concurrently. We affirm the judgment of convictions. Because we do not discern any jurisprudential value in publishing an opinion, we issue this summary order. Rule 30.25(b).
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 8 (Thursday, January 12, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 3031]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-996]





                Sunshine Act Meetings



Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 8 / Thursday, January 12, 1995 / 
Sunshine Act Meetings
[[Page 3031]] 




United States International Trade Commission

[USITC SE-95-03]

TIME AND DATE: January 31, 1995 at 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436.

STATUS:

1. Agenda for future meeting
2. Minutes
3. Ratification List
4. Inv. Nos. 731-TA-678-682 (Final) (Stainless Steel Bar from 
        Brazil, India, Italy, Japan, and Spain)--briefing and vote.
5. Outstanding action jackets:
    1. GC-94-120, Initial determination in Inv. No. 337-TA-368 
        (Certain Rechargeable Nickel Metal Hydride Anode Materials 
        and Batteries).
    2. GC-94-121, Final initial determination finding no violation 
        of section 337 in Inv. No. 337-TA-358 (Certain Recombinantly 
        Produced Human Growth Hormones).

    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    By order of the Commission:

    Issued: January 9, 1995
Donna R. Koehnke,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95-996 Filed 1-10-95; 3:01 pm]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
Exhibit 32





                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly report of Petramerica Oil, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Earnest
Mathis, Jr., Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



                                       /s/ Earnest Mathis, Jr.
                                       -----------------------
                                       Earnest Mathis, Jr.
                                       Chief Executive Officer, President
                                       and Chief Financial Officer

                                       May 12, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 69 (Tuesday, April 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18425-18426]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8811]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Lodging of Partial Consent Decree Pursuant to the 
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act

    Notice is hereby given that a proposed Partial Consent Decree in 
United States v. Kenneth L. Thomas et al., Civil Action No. 93-4098-JLF 
(S.D. Ill.) entered into by the United States and defendant Kenneth L. 
Thomas, was lodged on March 28, 1995, with the United States District 
Court for the Southern District of Illinois. The proposed Partial 
Consent Decree resolves certain claims of the United States under 
Section 107 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation 
and Liability Act (``CERCLA''), 42 U.S.C. 9607, with respect to the 
M.T. Richards, Inc. Site (``Site'') in Crossville, Illinois. Under 
terms of the Partial Consent Decree, Kenneth L. Thomas will pay the 
United States $25,000, plus interest, as specified in the Partial 
Consent Decree in return for the government's [[Page 18426]] convenant 
not to sue Mr. Thomas for past costs incurred at the Site.
    The Department of Justice will receive comments relating to the 
proposed Partial Consent Decree for 30 days following publication of 
this Notice. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney 
General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, United States 
Department of Justice, P.O. Box 7611, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, 
D.C. 20044-7611, and should refer to United States v. Kenneth L. Thomas 
et al., D.J. Ref. No. 90-11-3-1112. The proposed Partial Consent Decree 
may be examined at the Office of the United States Attorney for the 
Southern District of Illinois, IL-S USA, Suite 300, 9 Executive Drive, 
Fairview Heights, Illinois 62208; the Region V Office of the United 
States Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 
Chicago, Illinois 60604; and at the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G 
Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, DC 20005, telephone no. (202) 624-
0892. A copy of the proposed Partial Consent Decree may be obtained in 
person or by person or by mail from the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G 
Street, NW., 4th Floor, Washington, DC 20005. In requesting a copy, 
please enclose a check in the amount of $5.25 (25 cents per page for 
reproduction costs), payable to the Consent Decree Library.
Joel M. Gross,
Acting Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 95-8811 Filed 4-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Julia Anderson, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Patsalos, J.), rendered May 2, 1989, convicting her of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Eiber, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.