Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 68 / Monday, April 10, 1995 / Notices 18151

written, notarized authorizations. Such

requests in the form prescribed may also

be presented in person at the Office of

Inspector General, Room 5041, National

Credit Union Administration, 1775

Duke Street, Alexandria, VA 22314.

Simultaneously with requesting

notification of inclusion in this system

of records, the individual may request

record access as described in the

following section on ‘‘Record Access

Procedures.’’

RECORDS ACCESS PROCEDURES:

Same as ‘‘Notification procedure.’’

CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES:

Same as ‘‘Notification procedure.’’

RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES:

The OIG collects information from

many sources, including the subject

individuals, employees of the NCUA,

other government employees, and

witnesses and informants, and nongovernmental sources.

SYSTEMS EXEMPTED FROM CERTAIN PROVISIONS

OF THE ACT:

Pursuant to 5 USC 552a(j)(2), this

system of records is exempt from

subsections (c)(3) and (4), (d), (e)(1),

(e)(2), (e)(3), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), (e)(4)(I),

(e)(5), (e)(8), (f) and (g) of the Act. This

exemption applies to information in the

system that relates to criminal law

enforcement and meets the criteria of

the (j)(2) exemption. Pursuant to 5 USC

552(k)(2), to the extent that the system

contains investigative material compiled

for law enforcement purposes, other

than material within the scope of

subsection (j)(2), this system of records

is exempt from 5 USC 552a(c)(3), (d),

(e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (H), and (I), and (f). The

exemption rule is contained in 12 CFR

792.34 of the NCUA regulations.

Dated at Alexandria, VA, this 30th day of

March 1995.

By the National Credit Union

Administration Board.

Becky Baker,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 95–8336 Filed 4–7–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7535–01–U –

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE

ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

National Endowment for the

Humanities

Meetings of Humanities Panel

AGENCY: National Endowment for the

Humanities.

ACTION: Notice of meetings.

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of

the Federal Advisory Committee Act

(Public Law 92–463, as amended),

notice is hereby given that the following

meetings of the Humanities Panel will

be held at the Old Post Office, 1100

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,

Washington, DC 20506.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

David C. Fisher, Advisory Committee

Management Officer, National

Endowment for the Humanities,

Washington, DC 20506; telephone (202)

606–8322. Hearing-impaired individuals

are advised that information on this

matter may be obtained by contacting

the Endowment’s TDD terminal on (202)

606–8282.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

proposed meetings are for the purpose

of panel review, discussion, evaluation

and recommendation on applications

for financial assistance under the

National Foundation on the Arts the

Humanities Act of 1965, as amended,

including discussion of information

given in confidence to the agency by the

grant applicants. Because the proposed

meetings will consider information that

is likely to disclose: (1) Trade secrets

and commercial or financial information

obtained from a person and privileged

or confidential; or (2) information of a

personal nature the disclosure of which

would constitute a clearly unwarranted

invasion of personal privacy, pursuant

to authority granted me by the

Chairman’s Delegation of Authority to

Close Advisory Committee meetings,

dated July 19, 1993, I have determined

that these meetings will be closed to the

public pursuant to subsections (c) (4),

and (6) of section 552b of Title 5, United

States Code.

1. Date: April 20, 1995.

Time: 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

Room: M–14.

Program: This meeting will review

applications for Elementary and Secondary

Education in the Humanities, submitted to

the Division of Education Programs for

projects beginning after August, 1995.

2. Date: April 25, 1995.

Time: 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

Room: M–14.

Program: This meeting will review

applications for Elementary and Secondary

Education in the Humanities, submitted to

the Division of Education Programs, for

projects beginning after August, 1995.

3. Date: April 27, 1995.

Time: 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

Room: M–14.

Program: This meeting will review

applications for Elementary and Secondary

Education in the Humanities, submitted to

the Division of Education Programs, for

projects beginning after August 1995.

David C. Fisher,

Advisory Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 95–8762 Filed 4–7–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7536–01–M

NUCLEAR REGULATORY

COMMISSION

River Bend Station, Unit 1 Gulf States

Utilities Company and Cajun Electric

Power Cooperative, Inc. Finding of No

Significant Antitrust Changes Time for

Filing Requests for Reevaluation

In connection with the applications

for amendments filed by Gulf States

Utilities Company (licensee or GSU)

dated January 13, 1993, as

supplemented, the Director of the Office

of Nuclear Reactor Regulation made a

finding on October 15, 1993, that there

have been no significant changes in the

licensee’s activities or proposed

activities since the completion of the

antitrust operating license review of the

River Bend Station (River Bend).

Subsequently, an NRC order and two

licensing amendments dated December

16, 1993, were issued which transferred

GSU’s ownership in River Bend to

Entergy Corporation and the operation

of River Bend to Entergy Operations,

Inc. On March 14, 1995, the United

States Court of Appeals For the District

of Columbia Circuit issued an Order

vacating the NRC order and the two

accompanying licensing amendments

and remanding the case to the NRC.

In light of the foregoing, the Director

of the Office of Nuclear Reactor

Regulation has reviewed the Court of

Appeals decision in Cajun Electric

Cooperative, Inc. v. FERC, 28 F.3d 173

(D.C. Cir. 1994) and the earlier findings

in this matter has made a new finding

in accordance with Section 105c(2) of

the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as

amended, that no significant changes in

the licensee’s activities have occurred

subsequent to the previous antitrust

review of River Bend. The finding is as

follows:

Under Section 105 of the Atomic

Energy Act of 1954, as amended, 42

U.S.C. 2135 (Act), 10 CFR 50.80 and

50.90, the Nuclear Regulatory

Commission (NRC or Commission)

conducts an antitrust review of changes

in ownership or operator of a power

production facility after initial

licensing. In situations where requests

for a change in ownership or operator

have been received after issuance of an

operating license for such a facility, the

staff has conducted a significant change

review to determine whether the