alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 57 (Friday, March 24, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 15496-15497]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7298]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 94-143]


Television Broadcasting Services; Albion, Nebraska

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final Rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document allots UHF Channel 24+ to Albion, Nebraska, in 
order to permit Citadel Communications Co., Inc. to amend it pending 
application (File No. BPCT-930726KH) for Channel 18 at Albion to 
specify operation on Channel 24+ without loss of cut-off protection. 
See 60 FR 91, published January 3,1994. The reference coordinates for 
Channel 24+ at Albion, Nebraska, are 41-55-58 and 98-17-23. With this 
action, the proceeding is terminated.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 4, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Hayne, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 
776-1654.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 94-143, adopted March 13, 1995, and 
released March 21, 1995. The full text of this decision is available 
for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC 
Dockets Branch (Room 230), 1919 M Street, NW, Washington, D.C. The 
complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, 
(202) 857-3800, 2100 M Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20037.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Television broadcasting.

[[Page 15497]] PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: Secs. 303, 48 Stat., as amended, 1082; 47 U.S.C. 154, 
as amended.


Sec. 73.606  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.606(b), the TV Table of Allotments under Nebraska, is 
amended by adding Channel 24+ at Albion.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 95-7298 Filed 3-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
#### Brian EASTERWOOD, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

No. 65814.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

March 14, 1995.

Robert E. Steele, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Becky Owenson Kilpatrick, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before GRIMM, C.J., REINHARD, P.J., and CRAHAN, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial, after an eviden-tiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. 84.16(b).
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6022

Kyungshin Lear Sales and Engineering LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

“Made in China 2025” or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed 

April 17, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-14-00276-CR

IN RE LEONARDO M. LOZANO, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

228th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1277258

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On April 8, 2014, relator Leonardo M. Lozano filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. 

App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this Court to compel the Honorable Marc 

Carter, presiding judge of the 228th District Court of Harris County, to rule on his 

motion for dismissal based on newly discovered evidence.
2

Although courts of appeals have jurisdiction in criminal matters, only the 

Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction over matters related to final postconviction felony proceedings. Tex. Code Proc. Ann. Art. 11.07, § 5 (West Supp. 

2013); Padieu v. Court of Appeals of Tex., Fifth Dist., 392 S.W.3d 115, 117 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 2013) (orig. proceeding). The Court of Criminal Appeals’ exclusive 

jurisdiction under article 11.07 does not, however, divest the courts of appeals of 

jurisdiction to decide the merits of a mandamus petition complaining that a district 

judge has not ruled on a motion when the relator has no article 11.07 application 

pending. Padieu, 392 S.W.3d at 117−18. 

We do not have jurisdiction over relator’s petition. In the motion relator 

purportedly filed in the trial court, relator references an “Art. 11.07 writ, seeking 

my justice.” To the extent that relator’s motion can be construed as an article 

11.07 application for writ of habeas corpus, only the Texas Court of Criminal 

Appeals has jurisdiction over relator’s requested relief. See id. at 117. Because it 

appears that relator filed this motion in connection with a pending article 11.07 

application, we do not have jurisdiction to compel the trial court to rule on relator’s 

motion. See id. at 117−18. 

Accordingly, we dismiss relator’s petition for writ of mandamus for lack of 

jurisdiction. 

 PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Boyce, Busby, and Wise.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 4764

_____________________________
R ICKIE W ILDER , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. John L. Miller , Judge

. October 23, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. R OBERTS , B ILBREY , and W INOKUR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Megan Long, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
## U NITED 

## S TATES 

## N AVY



## – M ARINE 

## C ORPS 

## C OURT OF 

## C RIMINAL 

## A PPEALS

_________________________ No. 201 7 0 0 37 0

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v. 

### JOSHUA U. SABINAS Lance Corporal ( E

- 3 ) , U.S. Marine Corps

Appellant

_________________________ A ppeal from the United States Navy

- Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Lieutenant Colonel Mark D

. Sameit , US MC

. Convening Authority: Command ing General , 1 st Marine Division, Camp Pendleton, CA

. Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation : Lieutenant Col onel Matthew J. Stewart , US MC

. For Appellant: C aptain Andrew R

. House, JAGC, USN

.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq

.

_________________________ Decided 4 April 2018

____________________

_____ Before M ARKS , W OODARD , and J ONES , Appellate Military Ju dges

___ ______________________ After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL Clerk of Court
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7636

Magna Electronics Technology, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-6319

PEER Bearing Company: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 103 (Tuesday, June 1, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 29262]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-11419]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK

[Public Notice 2021-6009]


Agency Information Collection Activities: Comment Request

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the United States.

ACTION: Submission for OMB review and comments request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Export-Import Bank of the United States (EXIM), as a part 
of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, 
invites the general public and other Federal Agencies to comment on the 
proposed information collection, as required by the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995. The collection provides EXIM staff with the information 
necessary to monitor the borrower's payments for exported goods covered 
under its short and medium-term export credit insurance policies. It 
also alerts EXIM staff of defaults, so they can manage the portfolio in 
an informed manner.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 2, 2021 to be 
assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted electronically on 
www.regulations.gov or by mail to Mia Johnson, Export-Import Bank of 
the United States, 811 Vermont Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20571.
    Form can be viewed at https://www.exim.gov/sites/default/files/pub/pending/eib92-27.pdf.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title and Form Number: EIB 92-27 Report of 
Overdue Accounts Under Short-Term Policies.
    OMB Number: 3048-0027.
    Type of Review: Regular.
    Need and Use: The collection provides EXIM staff with the 
information necessary to monitor the borrower's payments for exported 
goods covered under its short- and medium term export credit insurance 
policies. It also alerts Ex-Im Bank staff of defaults, so they can 
manage the portfolio in an informed manner.
    Affected Public: This form affects entities involved in the export 
of U.S. goods and services.
    Annual Number of Respondents: 745.
    Estimated Time per Respondent: 15 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 186.25 hours.
    Frequency of Reporting or Use: Monthly.
    Government Expenses:
    Reviewing Time per Year: 186.25 hours.
    Average Wages per Hour: $42.50.
    Average Cost per Year: $7,915.62.
    Benefits and Overhead: 20%.
    Total Government Cost: $9,498.75.

Bassam Doughman,
IT Specialist.
[FR Doc. 2021-11419 Filed 5-28-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
#### Lafayette L. BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 51282.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

June 4, 1996.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 30, 1996.

Susan L. Hogan, Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Jill C. LaHue, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before LAURA DENVIR STITH, P.J., and ULRICH and SMART, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Lafayette L. Brown appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evi-dentiary hearing. Mr. Brown contends that his guilty plea was entered unknowingly, un-intelligently and involuntarily because counsel was ineffective in failing to investigate whether the state had sufficient information to support a conviction prior to entry of the plea.

*152We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm by this summary order under Rule 84.16(b) but have furnished the parties with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth our reasoning.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7192

MAHLE Behr USA, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
<Page>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.01

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with this quarterly report of ML Cornerstone FuturesAccess LLC
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this "Report"), I, Robert
M. Alderman, Chief Executive Officer, President and Manager of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: May 16, 2005


By /s/ ROBERT M. ALDERMAN
   ----------------------
Robert M. Alderman
Chief Executive Officer, President and Manager
(Principal Executive Officer)
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6145

Yanfeng US Automotive Interior Systems I LLC:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 9 (Friday, January 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 3275]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-877]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Electrical and Communications Systems; 
Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Electrical and Communication 
Systems.
    Date & Time: January 30-31, 1995/8:30 a.m.-5:00 pm.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 
530 & 580 Arlington, Virginia 22230.
    Contact Person: Dr. Deborah Crawford, Program Director, Solid 
State and Microstructures, Division of Electrical and Communications 
Systems, Room 675, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., 
Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone: (703) 306-1339.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate applications of Faculty Early 
Career Development (CAREER) research proposals as part of the 
selection process for awards.
    Reason For Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4) and 
(6) of the Government Sunshine Act.

    Dated: January 9, 1995.
Linda Allen-Benton,
Deputy Division Director, HRM.
[FR Doc. 95-877 Filed 1-12-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6370

Dallas Airmotive, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel