alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6401

Apergy ESP Systems, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7111

Global Trade Works, LLC:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
**EXHIBIT 31.02**

**Rule13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications**

I,Barbra E. Kocsis, Chief Financial Officer of Merrill Lynch AlternativeInvestments LLC, the manager of ML Cornerstone FuturesAccess LLC, certify that:

1. I have reviewed thisreport on Form 10-Q of ML Cornerstone FuturesAccess LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,of internal control over financial reporting to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date:  May 15, 2007 |   |
|--------------------------|--------|

 
| By                                            | /s/ BARBRA E.  KOCSIS |   |
|-----------------------------------------------|-----------------------|--------|
| Barbra E. Kocsis                              |
| Chief Financial  Officer                      |
| (Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer) |

 

1

----
THE PHOENIX COMPANIES, INC.


EXHIBIT 10.8




FIRST AMENDMENT TO

THE PHOENIX COMPANIES, INC.

EXCESS BENEFIT PLAN

As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2009




The Phoenix Companies, Inc. Excess Benefit Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2009 (the “Plan”), is further amended effective March 31, 2010, as follows:




1.

Article I is amended to add a new subsection at the end to read as follows:




1.3

Freeze of Accrued Benefits  The benefits of each Participant under this Plan shall be determined based on the Participant's Accrued Benefits under the Pension Plan, including any of the Retirement Benefits (as defined in the Pension Plan) to which a Participant may become entitled under the terms of Appendix V of the Pension Plan, and such Accrued Benefits for all Participants under the Pension Plan were frozen effective March 31, 2010, pursuant to the Eighteenth Amendment to the Pension Plan.
#### Robert L. EMRICK, Appellant, v. TOTAL RISK MANAGEMENT, INC., Respondent.

No. WD 46971.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Dec. 28, 1993.

Patrick John Brady, Kansas City, for appellant.

Paul Douglas Cowing, Kansas City, for respondent.

Before HANNA, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and FENNER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

*ORDER*

Plaintiff appeals a judgment entered in favor of the defendant in a negligence action.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Stephen D. LAMB, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 64005.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

June 21, 1994.

Timothy R. Cisar, Lake Ozark, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Joanne E. Beal, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for appellee.

Before SIMON, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and GRIMM, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from a conviction of stealing in violation of § 570.030 RSMo (1986). He was sentenced to one year imprisonment in the Warren County jail and to pay a fine in the amount of $5,000.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                NFO Worldwide, Inc.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

                                                                 Years Ended December 31,
                                        1998              1997              1996             1995              1994
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income Statement Data(2)

<S>                                 <C>              <C>               <C>              <C>               <C>    
Revenues                            $275,351         $ 190,229         $ 154,943        $ 113,095         $90,435
Operating Income                      29,328            23,275            21,377           16,469          13,123
Net Income                            14,490            12,505            10,616            9,159           7,671
Basic Earnings per Share(1)         $    .68         $     .62         $     .53        $     .49         $   .41
Diluted Earnings per Share(1)       $    .67         $     .60         $     .51        $     .48         $   .41

Balance Sheet Data(2)

Working Capital                     $ 31,915         $  28,464         $  19,650        $  15,681         $   7,918
Total Assets                         451,798           170,274           125,443           86,781            75,465
Total Debt                           191,053            25,169             5,300            2,664             4,656
Stockholders' Equity                 121,763            96,724            74,397           51,226            41,180
</TABLE>

(1)  FOR COMPARABILITY, THE BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE REFLECT THE
     3-FOR-2 STOCK SPLITS EFFECTED ON OCTOBER 15, 1997, FEBRUARY 5, 1996, AND
     APRIL 5, 1994.
(2)  THE ABOVE TABLES HAVE BEEN PREPARED TO GIVE RETROACTIVE EFFECT TO THE
     MERGERS WITH PROGNOSTICS ON APRIL 1, 1997, AND THE MBL GROUP PLC. ON JULY
     11, 1997, WHICH WERE ACCOUNTED FOR USING THE POOLING OF INTERESTS METHOD.
     FOR DISCUSSION OF ACQUISITIONS, SEE NOTE 18 TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
     STATEMENTS.

                                       161
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

KATHLEEN A. WALDORF,

Appellant,

v.

PAMELA J. WALDORF-JANSON, individually, as Personal 

Representative of the Estate of Helyn Q. Waldorf, and as Trustee of the 

Helyn Q. Waldorf Revocable Trust Agreement as amended and restated 

on April 17, 2015, CHRISTOPHER V. WALDORF, JR., WILLIAM G. 

WALDORF, and STEPHEN M. WALDORF,

Appellees.

No. 4D21-95

[March 10, 2022]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Charles E. Burton, Judge; L.T. Case 50-2018-CP-003711-

XXXX-SB.

Jane Kreusler-Walsh, Rebecca Mercier Vargas, and Stephanie L. 

Serafin of Kreusler-Walsh, Vargas & Serafin, P.A., and Theodore S. 

Kypreos of Jones Foster P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.

John B.T. Murray, Jr., and John W. Terwilleger of Gunster, Yoakley & 

Stewart, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, FORST and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-6874

Sears Holdings Management Corporation:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 75 (Wednesday, April 19, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19594-19595]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9548]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Automated Tariff Filing and Information System Firms Certified 
for Batch Filing Capability of at Least One Type of Tariff as of April 
12, 1995; Notice

Calcutta, East Coast of India and Bangladesh/U.S.A. Conference, 
Metuchen, New Jersey
Dart Maritime Service, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania
Distribution Publications, Inc. (``DPI''), Oakland, California
D.X.I., Inc., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Effective Tariff Management Corporation (``ETM''), Bowie, Maryland
Expeditors International (``EI''), Seattle, Washington
Flexible Business Systems, Inc., Miami, Florida
Glenserve Company, Glendora, New Jersey
Insight Consulting Group, Saddle Brook, NJ
Japan-Atlantic and Gulf Freight Conference, Tokyo, Japan
Japan-Puerto Rico & Virgin Island Freight Conference, Tokyo, Japan
King Ocean Central America, S.A. (``KOCA''), Gundo Alt, Panama
King Ocean Service de Venezuela, S.A. (``KOSDV''), Chuao, Caracas
Logistical Concepts Ltd. (``LCL''), Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania
Maersk Inc., San Francisco, California
Maritime Management International, Inc., Miami, Florida
Matson Navigation Company, Inc., San Francisco, California
Matson Terminals, Inc., San Francisco, California
Miller Traffic Service, Inc., Maywood, California
Nippon Yusen Kaisha (``NYK''), San Francisco, California
NVO Tariff Services, Fremont, California
NX Corp., Columbia, Maryland
Ocean Tariff Bureau, Long Beach, California
Pacific Coast Tariff Bureau (``PCTB''), San Francisco, California
Paramount Tariff Services, Ltd. (``PTS''), Torrance, California
Rijnhaave Information Services, Inc., and World Tariff Services, Inc. 
(``WTS''), Union, New Jersey
Simple Transportation Solutions International, Titusville, Florida
Star Shipping A/S, San Francisco, California
Sumner Tariff Services, Inc., Washington, D.C.
Tariff Data Services, Houston, Texas
Transamericas T.I.S., Inc., Falls Church, Virginia
Transax Systems, Bridgewater, New Jersey
Trans-Pacific Freight Conference of Japan, Tokyo, Japan
Transportation Services, Inc. (``TSI''), Fort Lauderdale, Florida
U.S. Traffic Service, Torrance, California
Wallenius Lines AB, Woodcliff Lake, New Jersey
Wallenius Lines North America, Inc., Woodcliff Lake, New Jersey
Zim Container Service, Inc., New York, New York

    [[Page 19595]] Note: In the certification process, some 
certificants used software developed by other firms and may not be 
holding themselves out to file tariffs for the public, generally.
Joseph T. Farrell,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-9548 Filed 4-18-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 67301-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 76 (Thursday, April 20, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 19744]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9942]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Armed Forces Epidemiological Board; Notice of Closed Meeting

AGENCY: Armed Forces Epidemiological Board, DOD.

ACTION: Notice of closed meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    1. In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (P.L. 92-462) announcement is made of the following 
committee meeting:

    Name of Committee: Armed Forces Epidemiological Board, DOD.
    Date of Meeting: 21 April 1995.
    Time: 0800-1600.
    Place: U.S. Army Medical Research Institute for Infectious 
Diseases (USAMRIID), Ft. Detrick, Maryland.
    Proposed Agenda: Review of the Preservation of Stocks of 
Smallpox Virus.

    2. A portion of this meeting will be closed to the public for an 
intelligence briefing in accordance with section 552b(c) of title 5, 
U.S.C., specifically subparagraph (1) thereof and title 5, U.S.C., 
appendix 1, sub-section 10(d). Should additional information be 
desired, please contact the Executive Secretary, AFEB, Skyline Six, 
5109 Leesburg Pike, Room 667, Falls Church, Virginia 22041-3258.
Gregory D. Showalter,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-9942 Filed 4-19-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
EXHIBIT 11
                   COMPUTATIONS OF NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
                      (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)




                                                       YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                         1996           1995
                                                         ----           ----

PRIMARY:

   WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING                   10,184         9,388
   DILUTIVE STOCK OPTIONS                                   506           275
   OTHER COMMON SHARE EQUIVALENTS                           128            33
                                                         10,818         9,696
                                                        =======       =======

   NET INCOME                                           $ 9,016       $ 6,721
                                                        =======       =======

   PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE                           $   .83       $   .69
                                                        =======       =======






The earnings per share and share data reflect the three-for-two stock split
effected on February 5, 1996. Fully diluted earnings per common share has not
been presented on the basis that the difference between fully diluted and
primary earnings per share is less than $0.01 per share.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-11345 Conference Calendar

MICHAEL A. SPEARMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus CO III P. SYLER; TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE; WAYNE SCOTT, Director; MARK LAUGHLIN, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:96-CV-53-C

- - - - - - - - - - June 17, 1997 Before SMITH, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Michael A. Spearman, Texas inmate number 530480, appeals the partial final judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) for all the defendants in their official capacities and for Defendants Laughlin and Scott in their individual capacities. He argues that his excessive-force claim should not have been dismissed as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and the parties’ briefsNo. 96-11345 - 2 - and AFFIRM for the reasons adopted by the district court. Spearman v. Syler , No. 5:96-CV-053-C (N.D. Tex. Oct. 3, 1996). Spearman's motions for a jury trial and for the production of documents should be brought in the district court. His motions to show that the defendants do not have immunity and for default judgement are DENIED.
**EXHIBIT 32.02**

**Section 1350 Certification**

In connection with thisquarterly report of ML Cornerstone FuturesAccess LLC (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I, Barbra E. Kocsis, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. This Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2. The informationcontained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 14,2007
| By                                           | /s/ BARBRA E. KOCSIS |   |
|----------------------------------------------|----------------------|--------|
| Barbra E. Kocsis                             |
| Chief Financial Officer                      |
| (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |

 

----
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-7295

Honeywell International, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

“Made in China 2025” or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel