T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T DA NI E L MAL ON DA , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 73143 A ge nc yN o. A 078- 442- 402 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d June 15, 2011 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , O ’ S C A N N L A IN , an dF IS H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. D a ni e l M a l onda , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of I ndone s i a , pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the B oa r d of I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ or de rdi s m i s s i ng hi s appe a l f r om a n i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s de c i s i on de ny i ng hi s appl i c a t i on f ora s y l um , w i thhol di ng of r e m ova l , a nd p r o te c tio n u n d e rth e C o n v e n tio n A g a in s t T o rtu r e ( “C A T ” ) . O u rju r is d ic tio n is 

# FI LED JU N 29 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 73143 2 g o v ern ed b y 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e r ev iew fo r s ub stan ti al ev id en ce th e a g en cy ’s f a c tu a l f in d in g s . W

akkaryv. H

older , 5 5 8 F .3 d1 0 4 9 , 1 0 5 6 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ) . W e de nyi n parta nd gr anti n partthe pe t i t i on f orr e vi e w , a nd w e r e m and. T he re cord do es no tcom pel the concl usi on thatM al on da es t abl i shed e x tr a o r d in aryc ir c u m s tan c e s s u f f ic ie n t to e x c u s e h is u n tim e lya s y lu m ap p lic a tio n . See 8 C . F . R . § 1 2 0 8 . 4 (a)(5 ). A cco rd i n g l y, M al o n d a’ s asyl u m cl ai m fai l s. S ub st an t i al ev i d en ce sup p o rt s th e ag en cy’ s d en i al o f C A T rel i ef b ecau se M a lo n d af

a ile dto e s tab lis h it is m o r e lik e lyth an n o t th a t h e w ill b e to rtu r e din I n d o n e s iab yo rw ith th e a c q u ie s c e n c e o f th e g o v e rn m e n t. See W a kka ry , 558 F . 3d a t1068. Th e r e c o r dd o e s n o tc o mp e l th e c o n c l u s i o n th a tM a l o n d ae x p e r i e n c e dh arms in I n d o n e s iath a t r is e to th e le v e l o f p a s t p e r s e c u tio n . See W a kka ry , 55 8 F . 3d at 10 59 -60 (bei ng beat en, robb ed, and accost ed by a threa t eni ng m ob di d n otcom pel a pas tpers ec ut i on fi nd i ng ). H ow ever , i n anal yz i ng M al on da’ s f ear of f uture p e r s e c u tio n , th e a g e n c yd idn o t ap p lyth e d is f a v o r e dg r o up a n a ly s is s e t f o rth in Sa e l v . A s h c r o

ft , 386 F . 3d 922, 927- 29 ( 9th C i r . 2004) . I n l i ghtof thi s a nd our i nt e rve ni ng de c i s i ons i n T am pu bo lon v. H

older , 610 F . 3d 1056 ( 9th C i r . 2010) , and W a kka ry , w e r em and for the agency t o ass es s M al on da’ s w i thh ol di ng of re m ov al08- 73143 3 c la im u n d e rth e d is f

a v o r e dg r o up a n a ly s is in th e f ir s t in s tan c e . See IN

S v. V en tu ra , 53 7 U . S . 12 , 16 -18 (20 02 ) ( per c uri am ). E a c h p artys h a l l b e ari t s o wn c o s t s f o rth i s p e t i t i o n f

o rr e v i e w. P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D E N IE D i n p art; G R A N T E D i n p art; RE MAND E D.