alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Employment Agreement between us and Chris Sliva



 Exhibit 10.2 

February 15, 2010 
 Mr. Chris Sliva

 6306 Royalton Dr. 
 Dallas, TX 75230

 Dear Chris: 
 Congratulations on
your promotion to President - Morningstar for Dean Foods Company. 
 Here are the specifics of your increase: 

Effective Date 
 The effective date of
your new position is January 1, 2010. 
 Base Salary 

You will be paid $17,291.67 on a semi-monthly basis, less payroll taxes, which equates to an annual salary of $415,000.00 (+13.3%), less payroll taxes.
Your salary will be reviewed annually (next in March 2011). 
 Annual Incentive Opportunity 

Effective January 1, 2010, you will be eligible to earn an annual incentive as a participant in the Business Unit President - Morningstar Short-Term
Incentive Plan with a target amount equal to 65% of your annualized base salary, subject to the achievement of certain financial targets for the Business Unit President - Morningstar and certain individual objectives. 

Long Term Incentive Compensation 
 In
February 2010, the Board of Directors approved a Long Term Incentive grant for you, commensurate with the position of President - Morningstar for Dean Foods Company. Your 2010 targeted long-term compensation is $600,000.00. This includes: $180,000
target for Restricted Stock Units, representing 9,820 Restricted Stock Units; $180,000 target for Stock Options, representing 28,967 Stock Options; and $240,000 targeted Performance Cash Units. The amount and nature of any future long-term incentive
awards will be determined by the Board of Directors. 
 Benefits 

You will continue to be eligible for FlexSelect benefits (medical, dental, vision), 401k, Executive Deferred Compensation, Supplemental Executive
Retirement Plan (SERP), and Executive Long Term Disability. 







 Conclusion 

Chris, I am very excited about your new opportunity, and I look forward to your future contributions to Dean Foods. 

 

	
	Best regards,
	
	 /s/ Joseph E. Scalzo

	Joseph E. Scalzo
	Chief Operating Officer, Dean Foods


  

	
	 Agreed and accepted:

	
	 /s/ Chris Sliva

	 Chris Sliva

	
	 5-5-10

	 Date
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5638

Apergy ESP Systems, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5849

Scosche Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
----

----

**Exhibit      32.1**

**Certifications      Pursuant to**

**Section      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(18      U.S.C. Section 1350)**

|   | (1) | the                report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |   |                                                                                                        |
|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   | /s/ Kenneth              J. Koock                                                                      |
|        |   |   | Kenneth                J. KoockChief                Executive OfficerChief                Financial Officer |
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-7383

Nissan North America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5890

Scosche Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Jure Sola, Chief Executive Officer of Sanmina-SCI Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:





|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year endedOctober 2, 2010, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Periodic Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and




|   |                                                                                                                                                              
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of November 24, 2010 .





/s/ JURE SOLAJure SolaChief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)





This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Sanmina-SCI Corporation under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 54 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide an alternate release 

date for certain nonviolent offenders, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2023 

Ms. JACKSON LEE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide an alternate release date for certain nonviolent offenders, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Prison Bureau 

5 Nonviolent Offender Relief Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EARLY RELEASE FOR CERTAIN NONVIOLENT OF7 FENDERS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3624 of title 18, United 

9 States Code, is amended— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 54 IH

1 (1) in subsection (a), by inserting ‘‘on the early 

2 release date determined in accordance with sub3 section (h), if applicable, or otherwise’’ after ‘‘A 

4 prisoner shall be released by the Bureau of Prisons’’; 

5 and 

6 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(h) EARLY RELEASE FOR CERTAIN NONVIOLENT

8 OFFENDERS.—Notwithstanding any other provision of 

9 law, the Bureau of Prisons, pursuant to any policy for 

10 early release based on the prisoner’s conduct while incar11 cerated, shall release from confinement a prisoner who has 

12 served one half or more of their term of imprisonment (in13 cluding any consecutive term or terms of imprisonment) 

14 if that prisoner— 

15 ‘‘(1) has attained the age of 45 years; 

16 ‘‘(2) has never been convicted of a crime of vio17 lence; and 

18 ‘‘(3) has not engaged in any violation of institu19 tional disciplinary regulations involving violent con20 duct.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5280

Arrowhead Electrical Products, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5505 

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to remove 

a prohibition on the use of funds relating to the provision of a dangerous 

weapon or training in the use of a dangerous weapon. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 14, 2023 

Mr. OGLES (for himself and Mrs. HARSHBARGER) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act 

of 1965 to remove a prohibition on the use of funds 

relating to the provision of a dangerous weapon or training in the use of a dangerous weapon. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Educating Responsible 

5 Future Hunters Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT ON ESEA FUNDING. 

7 Section 8526 of the Elementary and Secondary Edu8 cation Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7906) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5505 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (5), by adding ‘‘or’’ after the 

2 semicolon; 

3 (2) in paragraph (6), by striking ‘‘; or’’ and in4 serting a period; and 

5 (3) by striking paragraph (7). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7323

Industrial Belting & Transmission:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 44437

STATE OF IDAHO ,

Plaintiff

- Respondent ,

v.

LLOYD RAY WEHRLI ,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2017 Unpublished Opinion No. 566

Filed: August 31, 2017

Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, State of Idaho,
Jerome County. Hon. G. Richard Bevan , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and consecutive unified sentences of twelve years, with three and one

- half years determinate, for two counts of sexual abuse of a child under the age of sixteen, affirmed

.

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Reed P. Anderson , Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________
Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge; and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Lloyd Ray Wehrli pled guilty to two counts of sexual abuse of a child under the age of

sixteen years , Idaho Code § § 18

- 1506, 19

- 304(2) . The district court imposed consecutive unified

sentences of twelve years, with three and one

- half years determinate

. Wehrli appeals,

cont ending that his sentences are excessive.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

-2 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.

1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed t he record

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Wehrli ’s judgment of conviction and sentences are affirmed.
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1.     | Such                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30,                2006,                fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of                the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                      |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
| 2.     | The                information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for                the                period ended September 30, 2006, fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Universal                Fog Inc. |

| By:    | */s/*   *Tom                Bontems*Tom                BontemsChief Executive                OfficerChief Financial                Officer and Principal Accounting Officer |
|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                  |                                                                                                                                                                                                 |

| Dated: | November                10,                2006 |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------|