alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
31.2




CERTIFICATION
OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER




PURSUANT
TO SECTION 302




OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Joseph
Tik Tung Wong, certify that:




1.          I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2009 of China Premium Lifestyle Enterprise, Inc.




2.          Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report.




3.          Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report.




4.          The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




a. designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;




b. evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and




c. disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.




5.          The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions)





a. all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and







b. any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial
reporting.




August
      12, 2009
              By:
              /s/ Joseph Tik Tung
WongJoseph
      Tik Tung WongChief
      Financial Officer and
Treasurer
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4994

OMRON Management Center of America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 105 (Thursday, June 3, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 29762]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-11665]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 619-164]


Pacific Gas and Electric Company; The City of Santa Clara; Notice 
of Meeting

    a. Project Name and Number: Bucks Creek Hydroelectric Project No. 
619.
    b. Date and Time of Meeting: June 14, 2021; 1:00 p.m.-2:00 p.m. 
Eastern Time.
    c. FERC Contact: Frank Winchell, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7d1b0f1c1316530a14131e151811113d1b180f1e531a120b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4d2b3f2c2326633a24232e252821210d2b283f2e632a223b">[email protected]</span></a>.
    d. Purpose of Meeting: To discuss the final Programmatic Agreement 
issued by the Commission for the relicensing of the Bucks Creek 
Hydroelectric Project.
    e. All local, state, and federal agencies, Indian tribes, and other 
interested parties are invited to attend; however, participation will 
be limited between the Commission's staff, Advisory Council on Historic 
Preservation, and California State Historic Preservation Office. Please 
email the FERC contact noted above by June 9, 2021, to receive specific 
instructions on how to attend. The meeting will be held remotely using 
Microsoft Teams.

    Dated: May 27, 2021.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-11665 Filed 6-2-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of Edmonds
6, Inc. for the quarter ending January 31, 2005, I, Richard Neussler, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Edmonds 6, Inc. hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

     1.   Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending January
          31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
          the quarter ending January 31, 2005, fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
          Edmonds 6, Inc.

Dated:  March 17, 2005

EDMONDS 6, INC.

By: /s/ Richard Neussler
-------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAGJEET SINGH GILL,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-72277

Agency No. A099-344-291

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 12, 2011** 

Before: SCHROEDER, ALARCÓN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

Jagjeet Singh Gill, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration

judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and

relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under

FILED

JUL 21 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-72277

8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, Sangha v. INS, 103 F.3d

1482, 1487 (9th Cir. 1997), and we deny the petition for review.

Gill testified police searched for him because of their belief that he could

become politically active like his father, their belief that Gill had connections to

militants, their desire to take revenge for his father’s past political activities, and an

investigation regarding a convict who escaped from jail. Substantial evidence

supports the agency’s finding that Gill failed to establish that a protected ground

was one central reason for the police’s interest in him. See id. at 1490-91; see also

Parussimova v. Mukasey, 555 F.3d 734, 740 (9th Cir. 2009) (“[t]he REAL ID Act

requires that a protected ground represent ‘one central reason’ for an asylum

applicant’s persecution”). Accordingly, Gill’s asylum and withholding of removal

claims fail. See Dinu v. Ashcroft, 372 F.3d 1041, 1045 (9th Cir. 2004).

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because

Gill failed to establish it is more likely than not that he will be tortured if returned

to India. See Singh v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 1100, 1113 (9th Cir. 2006).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
ex10_57.htm










 


EXHIBIT 10.57




Amendment No. 4 to the


Weingarten Realty Investors


Deferred Compensation Plan












WHEREAS, Weingarten Realty Investors (the “Employer”) sponsors the Weingarten Realty Investors Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) under the terms of which eligible participants are entitled to defer a portion of their compensation; and


 


WHEREAS, the Employer desires to amend the Plan as provided herein;







NOW THEREFORE, the Employer amends the Plan as follows, effective as of January 1, 2010.







1.             Section 6.1(b) of the Plan is hereby amended, as underlined, to be and read as follows:








	
  

	
(b)

	
One or more Education Accounts may be established for a Participant in the name of a Student, in accordance with the Participant’s Deferral Election. The Administrator may establish a maximum number of Education Accounts that may be maintained  by a Participant at any one time.












2.             Section 6.1(c) of the Plan is hereby amended, as underlined, to be and read as follows:








	
  

	
(c)

	
One or more Fixed Period Accounts may be established in accordance with the Participant’s Deferral Election.  The Participant must designate the year of distribution at the time the Account is initially established. The minimum initial deferral period for each Fixed Period Account shall be three (3) years. The Administrator may establish a maximum number of Fixed Period Accounts that may be maintained by a Participant at any one time.

















IN WITNESS WHEREOF, WEINGARTEN REALTY INVESTORS has caused this instrument to be executed by its duly authorized officer this 26 day of February, 2010, effective as of January 1, 2010.


 




	 	
WEINGARTEN REALTY INVESTORS

	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
By: 

	/s/ Stephen C. Richter	 
	 	 	Stephen C. Richter	 
	 	 Its: (Title)	Executive Vice President & CFO
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gilbert Cruz, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him of burglary in the second degree and petit larceny, defendant contends that the People did not disprove his alibi defense beyond a reasonable doubt. That contention is without merit. On this bench trial, the court had the opportunity to view defendant’s alibi witnesses, hear their testimony and observe their demeanor *(see, People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495). The court stated that he did not find their testimony credible and nothing in the record would lead us to disturb that determination *(see, People v Sutton,*108 AD2d 942). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Marshall, J.—burglary, second degree.) Present—Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Dávis, JJ.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7562

Nima Labs, Inc: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions.

pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
#### Barbara T. TUREEN, Petitioner/Appellant, v. John F. TUREEN, Respondent/Respondent.

No. 66969.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

Nov. 21, 1995.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Feb. 7, 1996.

Application to Transfer Denied March 26, 1996.

Michael A. Gross, St. Louis, for appellant.

David B. Lacks, Leigh Joy Carson, Clayton, for respondent.

Before AHRENS, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and GRIMM, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner appeals from the trial court’s judgment dissolving the marriage. We have carefully reviewed the transcript and legal file. The trial court acted within its discretion and its findings are supported by the evidence.

*213The trial court awarded the Venice, Illinois real estate to respondent. The record does not indicate whether petitioner signed the note and deed of trust on that property in favor of Magna Bank. We clarify the trial court’s judgment by assigning that debt to respondent and ordering that he hold petitioner harmless on that indebtedness. Rule 84.14.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.1603).
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5699

Seaboard International, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                     |   |   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/  RICHARD                  MAN FAI LEE                                                      |   |   |   |
| Name: Richard                    Man Fai LeeChief                    Executive Officer and Director |   |   |        |
|                                                                                                     |   |   |   |
| November 17, 2006                                                                                   |   |   |   |

----
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7047

MAHLE Behr USA, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 80 (Wednesday, April 24, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18138-18139]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10095]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 18139]]


ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-5462-6]


National Drinking Water Advisory Council; Notice of Open Meetings

    Under Section 10(a)(2) of Public Law 92-423, ``The Federal Advisory 
Committee Act,'' notice is hereby given that a meeting of the National 
Drinking Water Advisory Council established under the Safe Drinking 
Water Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. Sec. 300f et seq.), will be held on 
May 14, 1996, from 2:30 p.m. until 6:00 p.m. and on May 15, 1996, from 
9:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. at the Concord Hilton Hotel, 1970 Diamond 
Boulevard, Concord, California 94520. The purpose of this meeting is 
two fold. The Council will receive a status on the development of the 
Proposed Groundwater Disinfection Rule and an update on the Redirection 
of the Drinking Water Program. The Agency will seek Council advice on 
consumer awareness as it relates to public drinking water supplies and 
conduct a general discussion on the implementation issues of a State 
Revolving Fund.
    These meetings are open to the public. The Council encourages the 
hearing of outside statements and will allocate one hour on May 14, 
1996, for this purpose. Oral statements will be limited to ten minutes, 
and it is preferred that only one person present the statement. Any 
outside parties interested in presenting an oral statement should 
petition the Council by telephone at (202) 260-2285 before May 9, 1996.
    Any person who wishes to file a written statement can do so before 
or after a Council meeting. Written statements received prior to the 
meeting will be distributed to all members of the Council before any 
final discussion or vote is completed. Any statements received after 
the meeting will become part of the permanent meeting file and will be 
forwarded to the Council members for their information.
    Members of the public that would like to attend the meeting, 
present an oral statement, or submit a written statement, should 
contact Ms. Charlene Shaw, Designated Federal Officer, National 
Drinking Water Advisory Council, U.S. EPA, Office of Ground Water and 
Drinking Water (4601), 401 M Street SW., Washington, DC 20460. The 
telephone number is Area Code (202) 260-2285.

    Dated: April 16, 1996.
William R. Diamond,
Acting Director, Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water.
[FR Doc. 96-10095 Filed 4-23-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M