alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 68 (Monday, April 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 18164]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8768]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Civil Tiltrotor Development Advisory Committee Economics 
Subcommittee

    Pursuant to Section 10(A)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
Public Law (72-362); 5 U.S.C. (App. I), notice is hereby given of a 
meeting of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) sponsored Civil 
Tiltrotor Development Advisory Committee (CTRDAC) Economics 
Subcommittee that will be held on April 17, 1995 in Cambridge, MA, at 
the Volpe National Transportation Systems Center (VNTSC), 55 Broadway, 
Kendall Square, in the Executive Conference Center, 12th Floor.
    The meeting will begin at 9:30 a.m. and conclude by 3:00 p.m.
    The Agenda for the third Economics Subcommittee meeting will 
include the following:
    (1) Review and discussion on the draft executive summary of the 
economics report.
    (2) Review of assumptions.
    (3) Review of schedule and work plans.
    Persons who plan to attend the meeting should notify Ms. Karen 
Braxton on 202-267-9451 by April 13. Attendance is open to the 
interested public, but limited to space available. With the approval of 
the Chairperson, members of the public may present oral statements at 
the meeting.
    Members of the public may provide a written statement to the 
Subcommittee at any time.
    Persons with a disability requiring special services, such as an 
interpreter for the hearing impaired, should contact Ms. Karen Braxton 
at least three days prior to the meeting. Issued in Washington, DC., 
April 4, 1995.
Richard A. Weiss,
Designated Federal Official, Civil Tiltrotor Development Advisory 
Committee.
[FR Doc. 95-8768 Filed 4-7-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5151 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5151

     To require responsiveness testing of Defense Logistics Agency 
                       pharmaceutical contracts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 4, 2023

  Mr. Neguse introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To require responsiveness testing of Defense Logistics Agency 
                       pharmaceutical contracts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Further Strengthening Supply Chains 
for Servicemembers and Security Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. RESPONSIVENESS TESTING OF DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY 
              PHARMACEUTICAL CONTRACTS.

    The Director of the Defense Logistics Agency shall modify Defense 
Logistics Agency Instructions 5025.03 and 3110.01--
            (1) to require Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support to 
        coordinate annually with customers in the military departments 
        to conduct responsiveness testing of the Defense Logistics 
        Agency's contingency contracts for pharmaceuticals; and
            (2) to include the results of that testing, as reported by 
        customers in the military departments, in the annual reports of 
        the Warstopper Program.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23.1


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
33-78220 and 33-78222 of NSD Bancorp, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated
January 31, 2003 on the consolidated balance sheet of NSD Bancorp, Inc. as of
December 31, 2002 and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in
shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the two years in the period then
ended, incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of NSD
Bancorp, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE, LLP

/DELOITTE & TOUCHE, LLP/
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
March 29, 2004
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to 

revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports.

-1-

S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N

C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

UNPUBLISHED

November 26, 2019

v No. 339236

Wayne Circuit Court

AMANDA JENISE HARDY, LC No. 17-002020-01-FH

Defendant-Appellant.

Before: O’BRIEN, P.J., and BECKERING and LETICA, JJ.

LETICA, J. (concurring).

I concur in the result only. Although I disagree that this issue was preserved below, 

review under the plain-error standard does not change the outcome. Despite the prosecutor’s 

knowledge of defense counsel’s earlier alleged statement1 and her skepticism of defendant’s 

adamant denial, injecting prosecutorial testimony was improper and warrants reversal in this 

case. People v Christensen, 64 Mich App 23, 28-29; 235 NW2d 50 (1975) (a prosecutor engages 

in misconduct when the prosecutor injects personal knowledge into the proceedings through 

testimonial questioning); People v Brocato, 17 Mich App 277, 295; 169 NW2d 483 (1969)

(same). 

/s/ Anica Letica 

 1 Defense counsel’s redirect questioning indicates that defendant never consulted with counsel 

for such a purpose, but defense counsel’s appellate brief now appears to admit the statement was 

made, albeit during plea negotiations.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4762

ECM Industries LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_5-30-2019.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXHIBIT
32.1






CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






I,
Gregory Lykiardopoulos, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Triton Distribution Systems, Inc. on Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal
quarter ended March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Triton
Distribution Systems, Inc.








Date: August 15,
      2008
            By: 
      /s/ Gregory
      Lykiardopoulos
              Gregory
      Lykiardopoulos
              Chief
      Executive Officer
INPUT

.05

80
Consistent with USTR's Section 301 notice, OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. requests

confidential treatment for the information designated as business confidential in this submission. Such

information consists of information that would not customarily be released to the public, including

business or trade secrets regarding production costs and processes, data on sales, product characteristics

customers, destinations, and other product, sales, and cost-related business secrets. Business confidential

information has been indicated herein by enclosing it in single brackets (“[ ]”). A public version of these

comments is also being filed with all confidential information removed.

OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. submits this exclusion request on behalf of our business

unit. OMRON in the US is the only designer of this product and only supplier of this component.

HOUSING, RHD for START STOP SWITCH is a plastic housing and is used only automotive purposes

of containing an engine start switch, which is an OEM-specified dimension. It is only used for further

assembly of components which go into domestic automobile production, which is specified by auto

manufacturer.

This product is not a target of the US Administration's 301 investigation regarding Intellectual Property

concerns. This is not a concern to IP transfer and impressment. This product contains no IP of interest

related to autonomous vehicle production.

The tariff action ultimately poses a risk of significant damage to OMRON, the domestic automobile

industry, and ultimately the US consumer as a increase in price. Like in the case of similar approvals for

vehicle components at the HTS level, OMRON views this product in the same manner. Immediate

movement of production to a US manufacturer or another country would pose significant re-tooling

costs, significant amounts of time, and approvals pertaining to consumer automobile safety standards are

costly and would take a significant amount of time to obtain.

OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. believes that CBP can easily exclude the CASE for

IMMOBILIZER in question based solely on the product description. The following are draft CBP

exclusion instructions:

"CASE for IMMOBILIZER; circular plastic housing with a raised surface encircling the circumference, a

plastic five-sided clip at the 3 o'clock position on the diameter of the circular housing extending appx

back 90 degrees from the surface orientation; and a plastic rectangular connector housing extending appx

back 90 degrees from the surface orientation of the circular housing; made of resin - PBT G20 BLK

dimensions 51.00mm X 67.00mm X 48.50mm."

This information will be contained on the invoice from the supplier.
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed October 18, 2023 Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D23

- 0 603 Lower Tribunal No. F01

- 292

________________ 

### Franz Rigg , Appellant,

vs. 

### The State of Florida , Appellee.
An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami

- Dade County, Michelle Delancy , Judge. Daniel A. Callahan, P.A., and Daniel A. Callahan (Fort Lauderdale), for appellant

. Ashley Moody , Attorney General, and Sandra Lipman , Senior Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, MILLER and LOBREE , JJ. PER CURIAM.2 Affirmed. See Jones v. State , 709 So. 2d 512, 521 (Fla. 1998) (“Two requirements must be met in order for a conviction to be set aside on the basis of newly discovered evidence. First, in order to be considered newly discovered, the evidence ‘must have been unknown by the trial court, by the party, or by counsel at the time of trial, and it must appear that defendant or his counsel could not have known [of it] by the use of diligence.’ Torres

– Arboleda v. Dugger , 636 So. 2d 1321, 1324

– 25 (Fla. 1994). Second, the newly discovered evidence mu st be of such nature that it would probably produce an acquittal on retrial. ”) ; Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(b)(1) (providing that a claim for postconviction relief must be filed no later than two years after the judgment and sentence become final “unless it all eges that. . . the facts on which the claim is predicated were unknown to the movant or the movant’s attorney and could not have been ascertained by the exercise of due diligence, and the claim is made within 2 years of the time the new facts were
or could have been discovered with the exercise of due diligence”).
IIB 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5302 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2024 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the Air and Marine Operations Marine Unit 

of the U.S. Customs and Border Protection located at 

101 Km 18.5 in Cabo Rojo, Puerto Rico, as the ‘‘Michel 

O. Maceda Marine Unit’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 5302 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Michel O. Maceda Me3 morial Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

5 Congress finds the following: 

6 (1) Marine Interdiction Agent Michel O. 

7 Maceda served honorably in the United States Army 

8 as a wheeled vehicle mechanic prior to joining the 

9 United States Border Patrol as an Agent in Doug10 las, Arizona, in April 2016. 

11 (2) Agent Maceda became a Marine Interdiction 

12 Agent with U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 

13 Air and Marine Operations in Mayagu ̈ez, Puerto 

14 Rico, in 2021. 

15 (3) On November 17, 2022, Agent Maceda and 

16 2 other agents were conducting a drug interdiction 

17 stop off the coast of Puerto Rico, during which the 

18 agents boarded the target vessel. 

19 (4) During the stop, Agent Maceda was mor20 tally wounded when 1 of the occupants of the vessel 

21 shot the boarding agents with a firearm. 

22 (5) Agent Maceda is survived by his daughter, 

23 brother, and parents. 

24 SEC. 3. DESIGNATION. 

25 The Air and Marine Operations Marine Unit of the 

26 U.S. Customs and Border Protection located at 101 Km 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 5302 RFS

1 18.5 in Cabo Rojo, Puerto Rico, shall forever be known 

2 and designated as the ‘‘Michel O. Maceda Marine Unit’’. 

3 SEC. 4. REFERENCES. 

4 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

5 paper, or other record of the United States to the marine 

6 unit referred to in section 3 shall be deemed to be a ref7 erence to the ‘‘Michel O. Maceda Marine Unit’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 24, 

2024. 

Attest: KEVIN F. MCCUMBER, 

Clerk. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

In connection with this Report on
Form 10-Q of Foundation Coal Corporation for the period ended March 31, 2009, I, James F. Roberts, Chief Executive Officer of Foundation Coal Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|1. | This Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in this Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Foundation Coal Corpoartion.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 15, 2009

/S/ JAMES F. ROBERTSJames F. RobertsChief Executive Officer
#### Arthur Puro, Respondent, v Louis Puro, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Eugene Nardelli, J.), entered on or about November 2, 1989, which, *inter alia,*granted plaintiffs motion for the appointment of a receiver over the affairs of the corporation, unanimously modified on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion by deleting that portion, incorporated by reference from the decision dated November 2, 1989, appointing plaintiff as receiver, and otherwise affirmed, with costs.

CPLR 6401 (a) provides in pertinent part that, "Upon motion of a person having an apparent interest in property which is the subject of an action in the supreme or a county court, a temporary receiver of the property may be appointed * * * where there is danger that the property will be removed from the state, or lost, materially injured or destroyed.” On this record, the acts alleged, together with the proof adduced, sufficiently support the court’s determination to appoint a receiver. Nevertheless, the appointment of plaintiff as receiver is not warranted, where, as in this case, the defendant has raised issues regarding possible self-interest by the plaintiff and with respect to plaintiffs ability to act impartially and in the best interests of the corporation.

*228As stated by this court in *Hahn v Wylie*(54 AD2d 622, 623), " 'Normally, a receiver must be a completely impartial person’ (7A Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac, par 6401.04). The circumstances herein do not require departure from this salutary standard.”

We find the parties’ remaining arguments to be without merit. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Kassal and Wallach, JJ.
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 72 (Friday, April 14, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 19012]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9221]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 93-74; RM-8153]

Radio Broadcasting Services; Yermo, CA

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule; dismissal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document dismisses a petition filed on behalf of Antelope 
Broadcasting, Co., Inc., permittee of Station KYHT(FM), Yermo, 
California, requesting the substitution of Channel 287B1 for Channel 
287A at Yermo, and modification of its facilities accordingly, based 
upon its withdrawal of interest in pursuing its modification request 
through the rule making process. See 58 FR 19395, April 14, 1993. With 
this action the proceeding is terminated.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Joyner, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 93-74, adopted April 3, 1995, and 
released April 11, 1995. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW, Washington, 
D.C. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, 
Inc., (202) 857-3800, 2100 M Street, NW, Suite 140, Washington, D.C. 
20037.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 95-9221 Filed 4-13-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
```
Unassociated Document


 


Exhibit 10.2







LEASE AGREEMENT







LESSOR:  New Agriculture Village, National Minority Town, Nationality Korean, Manchu, Tonghua County, Jilin Province, P.R.C


 


LESSEE:  Tonghua Huachen Herbal Planting Company Limited


 


Pursuant to the law, that Lessor hereby leases to Lessee, and Lessee leases from Lessor, subject to the terms and conditions herein set forth, the following:


 


Land Lease


 


Lessor hereby leases to Lessee said Land for the purpose of building up an herbal planting base to plant Schisandra (“Base”). The land area is approximately 165 acres (1,000 Chinese Acres).


 


Lease Term


 


The term of this lease is 25 years, beginning January 11th, 2008 to January 11th, 2033.  








	
(3)

	
Within the circle area with five kilometers radius around the Base, lessor shall not (a) use the prohibited agricultural chemicals by the nation like Calcium arsenate, carbofuran, zinc methylarsonate, etc. (b) pollute river and atmosphere and cannot build up factory and projects that have a negative impact on the environment.








	
(4)

	
If one of the parties intent to change the term of the lease, it needs to be notified the other party in two years ahead and the terms could be altered after the negotiation between the lessor and lessee.







 


Property Delivery


 


Start from the activation date of this lease agreement, the lessor should deliver the property to the lessee and the Lessee accepts the Property in its present condition.


 


Fee


 


Land:  1,000 Chinese Acres*RMB 1,400 Chinese Acre/year = RMB 1,400,000/year


  


30-year Total Rental:  RMB 1,400,000/year * 25 years = RMB 35,000,000


 


Payment.


 


A total of four payments need to be made amounting to the RMB 35,000,000.  The lease payments are to be paid on the dates, June 30, 2008 (paid by the Company) with the amount of RMB 1,400,000, June 30, 2009 with the amount of RMB 11,200,000, June 30, 2017 with the amount of RMB 11,200,000, and June 30, 2025 with the remaining amount of RMB 11,200,000.


 


Compliance with Law.


 


Lessee shall comply with all laws, orders, ordinances and other public requirements now or hereafter pertaining to lessee's use of the Leased Premises. Landlord shall comply with all laws, orders, ordinances and other public requirements now or hereafter affecting the Leased Premises. All conflicts and disagreements between the lessee and lessor should be settled by Tonghua County Arbitration Comission.


 


Any alternations to this Agreement shall be in writing and signed by all parties. We, the undersigned, agree to this Lease:









  





  











  












	
LESSOR

	  	
LESSEE

	  
	  	  	  	  
	  	  	  	  
	
Signature/Seal

	  	
Signature/Seal

	  
	  	  	  	  
	  	  	  	  
	
New Agriculture Village, National Minority Town, Nationality Korean, Manchu, Tonghua County, Jilin Province, P.R.C

	  	
Tonghua Huachen Herbal Planting Company Limited

	  
	  	  	  	  
	
Date: January 11, 2008

	  	
Date: January 11, 2008
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification of the Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of WMG Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period endedJune 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven Macri, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated: August 5,2010