19048 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 72 / Friday, April 14, 1995 / Notices

Martin Co., Line to Lake Worth Inlet and

from South Lake Worth Inlet to

Broward, General Design Plan,

Implementation, Martin and Broward

Counties, FL.

Summary: EPA expressed

environmental concerns regarding the

long-term consequences of how this

action meshes with other, similar beach

nourishment projects planned for the

county’s shoreline. EPA was

particularly concerned over impacts to

nearshore hardbottom habitat.

Dated: April 11, 1995.

B. Katherine Biggs,

Associate Director, NEPA Compliance

Division, Office of Federal Activities.

[FR Doc. 95–9289 Filed 4–13–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–U

[ER-FRL–4722–1]

Environmental Impact Statements;

Notice of Availability

Responsible Agency: Office of Federal

Activities, General Information (202)

260–5076 OR (202) 260–5075.

Weekly receipt of Environmental

Impact Statements Filed April 03, 1995

Through April 07, 1995 Pursuant to 40

CFR 1506.9.

EIS No. 950123, FINAL EIS, AFS, AK,

Helicopter Glacier Landing Tours,

Implementation, Issuance of SpecialUse-Permits, Tongass National Forest,

Chatham Area, Juneau Ranger District,

Alaska, Due: May 15, 1995, Contact:

John H. Favro (907) 586–8800.

EIS No. 950124, FINAL EIS, FHW, MT,

US 2 Reconstruction, Columbia

Heights to Hungry Horse, Funding,

Land Transfer and COE Section 404

Permit, Flathead County, MT, Due:

June 01, 1995, Contact: Dale Paulson

(406) 449–5310.

EIS No. 950125, DRAFT EIS, AFS, NV,

CA, Heavenly Ski Resort Master Plan,

Improvement, Expansion and

Management, Lake Tahoe Basin

Management Unit, Special-UsePermit, Douglas County, NV and El

Dorado and Alpine Counties, CA,

Due: May 29, 1995, Contact: Virgil

Anderson (916) 573–2600.

EIS No. 950126, DRAFT EIS, FHW, AZ,

Pima Freeway—Loop 101,

Construction, I–17 and Scottsdale

Road, Funding, NPDES and COE

Section 404 Permits, Maricopa

County, AZ, Due: May 30, 1995,

Contact: Ken Davis (602) 379–3646.

EIS No. 950127, DRAFT EIS, FHW, IA,

I–235 Study Corridor, Improvements

access to the Des Moines Central

Business District (CBD) and Westown

Parkway Area, Funding, Des Moines,

Polk County, IA, Due: June 06, 1995,

Contact: H.A. Willard (515) 233–7300.

EIS No. 950128, DRAFT EIS, USN, HI,

Bellows Air Force Station Land Use

and Development Plan,

Implementation, Waimanalo, HI, Due:

May 29, 1995, Contact: Gary Kasaoke

(808) 471–9338.

EIS No. 950129, DRAFT EIS, AFS, ID,

Secesh River Subdivision Access

Roads, Implementation, Special-UsePermit, Idaho County, ID, Due: May

30, 1995, Contact: Linda Fitch (208)

634–0408.

EIS No. 950130, FINAL EIS, FHW, WI,

MN, Stillwater-Houlton

Transportation System, MN-Trunk

Highway-36 and WI-Trunk-Highway64 Improvements, MN-TrunkHighway-36 and Washington CountyState-Aid-Highway-15 to WI-Trunk

Highway-64 near the Croix River

Bridge, Funding, US Coast Guard

Bridge Permit, COE Section 10 and

404 Permits, St. Croix, WI and

Washington County, MN, Due: May

15, 1995, Contact: Cheryl Martin (612)

290–3240.

EIS No. 950131, FINAL EIS, FAA, TX,

Adoption—Chase Field Naval Air

Station Disposal and Reuse

Implementation, as a Civilian Airport

Facility, City of Beeville, Bee County,

TX, Contact: Tami Buch (817) 222–

5681. The US Department of

Transportation’s Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA) has adopted

the Department of Defense’s, US Navy

final EIS filed 3–19–93. FAA was a

cooperating Agency for the above

final EIS. Recirculation of the

document is not necessary Under

Section 1506.3(c) of the Council on

Environmental Quality Regulations.

EIS No. 950132, DRAFT SUPPLEMENT,

COE, MS, Mississippi River and

Tributaries Flood Control Plan, Big

Sunflower River Maintenance Project,

Yazoo Basin, Sunflower, Washington,

Humphreys, Sharkey and Yazoo

Counties, MS, Due: May 29, 1995,

Contact: Marvin Cannon (601) 631–

5437.

Amended Notices

EIS No. 940512, DRAFT EIS, FHW, PA,

US 220 Transportation Improvements

Project, Bald Eagle Village to

Interstate 80 (I–80), Funding and COE

Section 404 Permit, Blair and Centre

Counties, PA, Due: May 22, 1995,

Contact: Manual A. Mark (717) 782–

3461. Published FR—12–23–94—

Review Period Reopened.

Dated: April 11, 1995.

B. Katherine Biggs,

Associate Director, NEPA Compliance

Division, Office of Federal Activities.

[FR Doc. 95–9290 Filed 4–13–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–U

[FRL–5191–9]

Science Advisory Board; Clean Air Act

Scientific Advisory Committee;

Notification of Public Advisory

Committee Meeting(s); Open Meeting

Pursuant to the Federal Advisory

Committee Act, Public Law 92–463,

notice is hereby given that the Clean Air

Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC)

of the Science Advisory Board (SAB)

will meet on May 4–5, 1995 at the

Courtyard Marriott, 2700 Eisenhower

Avenue, Alexandria, Virginia 22314;

telephone (703) 329–2323. The meeting

will begin at 9 a.m. and end no later

than 5 p.m. on both days. This meeting

is open to the public. Due to limited

space, seating will be on a first-come

basis. For further information, please

contact the individuals listed below.

Documents that are the subject of SAB

reviews are normally available from the

originating EPA office and are not

available from the SAB Office.

This meeting of the Clean Air

Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC)

will focus on reviewing the scientific

and technical adequacy of the agency’s

‘‘Health Assessment Document for

Diesel Emissions’’ (a document from the

Office of Research and Development,

Office of Health and Environmental

Assessment (OHEA), Environmental

Criteria and Assessment Office in

Research, Triangle Park, NC—ECAO).

The specific issues to be addressed

during the CASAC review are as

follows:

1. Does the document accurately

represent the key literature on diesel

emissions?

2. Are the cancer and noncancer

hazard identification and dose-response

assessments scientifically appropriate?

In particular:

(a) Is the application of dosimetry

modeling scientifically sound?

(b) Are the modes of action

appropriately identified and applied to

the health assessment?

(c) Are the qualitative and

quantitative cancer risk estimates

scientifically appropriate?

(d) Is the diesel inhalation reference

concentration (RfC) scientifically

appropriate?
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 72 / Friday, April 14, 1995 / Notices 19049

3. Is it possible to improve the diesel

risk characterization in the document,

given the inadequate exposure

information to compare to the

quantitative health assessment?

For example, will further/alternative

interpretations of the health effects

information advance the risk

characterization?

Availability of Documents

Single copies of the U.S. EPA health

assessment document may be obtained

from the Office of Research and

Development Publications Center,

CERI–FRN, U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency, 26 West Martin

Luther King Drive, Cincinnati, Ohio

45268; Telephone: (513) 569–7562; FAX

(513) 684–7566. Please provide your

name, mailing address and the EPA

document numbers EPA/600/8–90/

057Ba and Bb.

Members of the public desiring

additional information about the

meeting, including an agenda, should

contact Randall Bond, Designated

Federal Official, Clean Air Scientific

Advisory Committee, Science Advisory

Board (1400), US EPA, 401 M Street,

SW, Washington DC 20460, by

telephone at (202) 260–8414, FAX (202)

260–1889, or via The INTERNET at:

Bond.Randall@EPAMAIL.EPA.GOV.

Those individuals requiring a copy of

the draft Agenda and the charge to the

committee should contact Ms. Lori

Anne Gross at (202) 260–8414 or by

FAX at (202) 260–1889 or via the

INTERNET at

GROSS.LORI@EPAMAIL.EPA.GOV.

Additional information concerning the

Science Advisory Board, its structure,

function, and composition, may be

found in The Annual Report of the Staff

Director which is available by

contacting Ms. Gross at the previously

stated address.

Members of the public wishing to

make an oral presentation at the meeting

should contact Mr. Bond no later than

noon, Wednesday, April 26, 1995. The

request should identify the name of the

individual who will make the

presentation, requirements for audio

visual equipment (e.g., overhead

projector, 35mm projector, chalk board,

etc), and an outline of the issues to be

addressed. At least 35 copies of the

presentation and 35 copies of the visual

aids used at the meeting are to be given

to Mr. Bond no later than the time of the

presentation for distribution to the

Committee and the interested public.

See below for additional information on

providing comments to the SAB.

Providing Oral or Written Comments at

SAB Meetings

The Science Advisory Board expects

that public statements presented at its

meetings will not be repetitive of

previously submitted oral or written

statements. In general, each individual

or group making an oral presentation

will be limited to a total time of ten

minutes. Written comments (at least 35

copies) received in the SAB Staff Office

sufficiently prior to a meeting date, may

be mailed to the relevant SAB

committee or subcommittee prior to its

meeting; comments received too close to

the meeting date will normally be

provided to the committee at its

meeting. Written comments may be

provided to the relevant committee or

subcommittee up until the time of the

meeting.

Dated: April 6, 1995.

Donald G. Barnes,

Staff Director, Science Advisory Board.

[FR Doc. 95–9246 Filed 4–13–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

[FRL 5191–6]

Public Water System Supervision

Program Revision for the State of

Wisconsin

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given in

accordance with the provision of § 1413

of the Safe Drinking Water Act, as

amended, 42 U.S.C. 300f et seq., and 40

CFR part 142, subpart B, the National

Primary Drinking Water Regulations

(NPDWR), that the State of Wisconsin is

revising its approved Public Water

System Supervision (PWSS) primacy

program. The Wisconsin Department of

Natural Resources (WDNR) adopted

drinking water regulations for 18

synthetic organic chemicals (SOCs), and

5 inorganic chemicals (IOCs), that

correspond to the NPDWR for SOCs and

IOCs, promulgated by the U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency (U.S.

EPA) on July 17, 1992 (57 FR 31776–

31849). The U.S. EPA has completed its

review of Wisconsin’s PWSS primacy

program revision and has determined

that the State program revision is no less

stringent than the corresponding

Federal regulations.

The U.S. EPA has determined that the

Wisconsin rule revision meets the

requirements of the Federal rule.

Therefore, the U.S. EPA is proposing to

approve the WDNR’s rule revision. All

interested parties are invited to submit

written comments on this proposed

determination, and may request a public

hearing on or before May 15, 1995. If a

public hearing is requested and granted,

the determination shall not become

effective until such time following the

hearing, at which the Regional

Administrator issues an order affirming

or rescinding this action. Frivolous or

insubstantial requests for a hearing may

be denied by the Regional

Administrator.

Requests for public hearing should be

addressed to: Miguel A. Del Toral, (WD–

17J), U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson

Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.

Any request for a public hearing shall

include the following: (1) The name,

address, and telephone number of the

individual, organization, or other entity

requesting a hearing. (2) A brief

statement of the requesting person’s

interest in the Regional Administrator’s

determinations and of information that

the requesting person intends to submit

at such hearing. (3) The signature of the

individual making the request; or, if the

request is made on behalf of an

organization or other entity, the

signature of a responsible official of the

organization or other entity.

Notice of any hearing shall be given

not less than fifteen (15) days prior to

the time scheduled for the hearing. Such

notice will be made by the Regional

Administrator in the Federal Register

and in newspapers of general

circulation in the State of Wisconsin. A

notice will be sent to the person(s)

requesting the hearing as well as to the

State of Wisconsin. The hearing notice

will include a statement of purpose,

information regarding the time and

location, and the address and telephone

number where interested persons may

obtain further information. The Regional

Administrator will issue an order

affirming or rescinding his

determination upon review of the

hearing record. Should the

determination be affirmed, it will

become effective as of the date of the

order.

Should no timely and appropriate

request for a hearing be received, and

should the Regional Administrator not

elect to hold a hearing on his own

motion, these determinations shall

become effective on May 15, 1995.

Please bring this notice to the attention

of any persons known by you to have an

interest in these determinations.

All documents related to these

determinations are available for

inspection between the hours of 8:30

a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through

Friday, at the following offices:

Wisconsin Department of Natural

Resources, Bureau of Water Supply,