U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Global Change and Photosynthesis Research: Urbana, IL
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Urbana, Illinois Global Change and Photosynthesis Research Research Publications at this Location





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Title:   Author  item
                                            Ainsworth, Elizabeth

                                                         - *Lisa*item
                                            LEAKEY, ANDREW D B - UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOISitem
                                            Ort, Donalditem
                                            LONG, STEPHEN - UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS
  Submitted to: New Phytologist
                                    Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal
                                    Publication Acceptance Date: 4/15/2008
                                    Publication  Date: 7/1/2008
                                    Citation: Ainsworth, E.A., Leakey, A.D.B., Ort, D.R., Long, S.P. 2008. FACE-ing the facts: Inconsistencies and interdependence among field, chamber and modeling studies of elevated [CO2] impacts on crop yield and food supply. New Phytologist. 179:5-9.Interpretive Summary: Previously, we reported that stimulation of seed yield in response to elevated [CO2] is lower in free air concentration enrichment (FACE) experiments than in enclosure studies of the world’s four most important food crops. The implications of this finding were that (1) modeling studies using CO2 fertilization factors derived from enclosure experiments may have over-estimated future food supply; and (2) additional field experiments are needed to better understand the mechanism of response and drive research and development efforts to improve crop yields under future climatic conditions. Since publishing these results, they have been vigorously challenged by others. In this paper,  we used a different statistical model to test the yield results from FACE and chamber experiments and again show that they are significantly different. While enclosure studies have been critical in discerning mechanisms of response of crops to elevated [CO2], they are not the best experimental facilities for estimating CO2 response ratios of crop yields. We recommend that more FACE experiments are needed in addition to the chamber studies in order to generate the best possible understanding of crop responses to elevated [CO2] and to improve the performance of crops under future conditions.
                                Technical Abstract: This letter to New Phytologist defends Long et al. (2006), in which we reported that stimulation of seed yield in response to elevated [CO2] is lower in FACE experiments than in enclosure studies of the world’s four most important food crops.  We suggested that the implications of this finding were that (1) modeling studies using CO2 fertilization factors derived from enclosure experiments may have over-estimated future food supply; and (2) additional field experiments are needed to better understand the mechanism of response and drive research and development efforts to improve crop yields under future climatic conditions.  Tubiello et al. (2007a) have vigorously challenged these findings and subsequently dismissed our results in Tubiello et al. (2007b) and in the latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report (Easterling et al., 2007). In this letter, we use a different statistical model to again show that FACE experiments are significantly different from chamber studies, and we highlight important differences between modeling results and experimental results. While enclosure studies have been critical in discerning mechanisms of response, they are not the best experimental facilities for estimating CO2 response ratios of yield. We reiterate the concern that more FACE experiments are needed in addition to the chamber studies in order to generate the best possible understanding of crop responses to elevated [CO2] and to improve the performance of crops under future conditions.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov