alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 26, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-7067

Gatekeeper Systems, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
PUBLIC VERSION
$[*********] [******]

$[*********]

INPUT

20.0

$[*********]

[******]

[******]

0.05

PUBLIC VERSION
Consistent with USTR's Section 301 notice, OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. requests

confidential treatment for the information designated as business confidential in this submission. Such

information consists of information that would not customarily be released to the public, including

business or trade secrets regarding production costs and processes, data on sales, product characteristics

customers, destinations, and other product, sales, and cost-related business secrets. Business confidential

information has been indicated herein by enclosing it in single brackets (“[ ]”). A public version of these

comments is also being filed with all confidential information removed.

OMRON in the US is the only designer of this product and only supplier of this component.

KNOB,3WAY ROCKER is a molded plastic switch actuator, and is used only for automotive purposes

in power mirrors, of which is an OEM-specified dimension. It is only used for further assembly of

components which go into domestic automobile production, which is specified by auto manufacturer.

This product is not a target of the US Administration's 301 investigation regarding Intellectual Property

concerns. This is not a concern to IP transfer and impressment. This product contains no IP of interest

related to autonomous vehicle production.

The tariff action ultimately poses a risk of significant damage to OMRON, the domestic automobile

industry, and ultimately the US consumer as a increase in price. Like in the case of similar approvals for

vehicle components at the HTS level, OMRON views this product in the same manner. Immediate

movement of production to a US manufacturer or another country would pose significant re-tooling

costs, significant amounts of time, and approvals pertaining to consumer automobile safety standards are

costly and would take a significant amount of time to obtain.

OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. believes that CBP can easily exclude the KNOB,3WAY

ROCKER in question based solely on the product description. The following are draft CBP exclusion

instructions:

"KNOB,3WAY ROCKER: MIRROR SWITCH oval shaped three-directional switch with directional

arrows at each end Plastic knob for-made of plastic resin PC CLR LEXAN 121R Dimensions 24.36mm

x12.47mm x19.5mm."

This information will be contained on the invoice from the supplier.

PUBLIC VERSION
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-5424

Robert Bosch Tool:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6409

C&U Americas, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
UNITED STATES NAVY–MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

_________________________

No. 201700370

_________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v.

JOSHUA U. SABINAS

Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps

Appellant

_________________________

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Lieutenant Colonel Mark D. Sameit, USMC.

Convening Authority: Commanding General, 1st Marine Division, 

Camp Pendleton, CA.

Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation: Lieutenant Colonel Matthew 

J. Stewart, USMC.

For Appellant: Captain Andrew R. House, JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________

Decided 4 April 2018

_________________________

Before MARKS, WOODARD, and JONES, Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening 

authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c). 

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-6912

Polaris Industries Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

“Made in China 2025” or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
December 31, 1996 Form 10-K and is qualified in its entirety by reference to 
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          20,096
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,346
<ALLOWANCES>                                       335
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                40,073
<PP&E>                                          22,452
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,122
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 197,753
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,555
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           191
<OTHER-SE>                                      76,236
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   197,753
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                72,404
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,799
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,455
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   150
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,977
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,957
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,996
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,961
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,961
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.48
        


</TABLE>
exv10w8






Exhibit 10.8




THIRD AMENDMENT TO SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED EXECUTIVE

SERVICES AGREEMENT




     This
Third Amendment (the “Amendment”) to that certain Second Amended and Restated
Executive Services Agreement dated as of November 30, 2009 (the “Employment Agreement”) by and
between Pain Cuit, Inc. (the “Lender”), Mark Gill
(“Employee”) and The Film Department Holdings Inc., a
Delaware corporation, as successor-in-interest to The Film
Department Holdings LLC, (the “Company”), is made as of April 27, 2010 (the “Effective Date”),
and is entered into by and between Company, Lender and Employee.



     WHEREAS,
Company, Lender and Employee have previously entered into the Employment
Agreement; and



     WHEREAS,
Company, Lender and Employee have agreed to amend specific terms of the Employment
Agreement in accordance with the terms set forth below. All capitalized terms not defined herein
shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Employment Agreement.



     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the agreements made herein, the parties hereto agree as
follows:



     1. The
Employment Agreement is hereby amended by deleting both references to
“April 30,
2010” in Sections 1 and 4, and substituting
“May 31, 2010” in lieu thereof in both
instances.



     2. This Employment Agreement is intended to comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) and the regulations and guidance promulgated thereunder
(collectively, “Code Section 409A”) and will be interpreted in a manner intended to comply with
Code Section 409A.



     IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this Third Amendment as of
the date first above written.








	 	 	 	 	 	 
	THE FILM DEPARTMENT HOLDINGS LLC	 	PAIN CUIT, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	/s/ Neil Sacker 	 	/s/ Mark Gill
	 	 	 
	By:

	 	Neil Sacker	 	By:

	Mark Gill

	Its:

	 	President & COO	 	Its:

		 	 
	 
	 
	 	 	/s/ Mark Gill
	 	 	Mark
Gill
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cole Credit Property Trust II, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Cole Credit Property Trust II, Inc.Date: November 12, 2010
    By:
    /s/ Christopher H. ColeName:
    Christopher H. ColeTitle:
    Chief Executive
Officer and President
(Principal Executive
Officer)
NOTE: This orderis nonprecedential. 

# muiteb**~tate~** 

# (!Court of**§ppeaI~** 

# for tbe jf 

# eberaI (!Circuit

PSC VSMPO-A VISMA CORPORATION AND 

### VSMPO-TIRUS, U.S., INC., Plaintiffs·CrossAppellants, 

### v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee, AND 

### US MAGNESIUM LLC, Defendant-Appellant. 2011-1370, -1395 Appeals from the United States Court ofInternational Trade in consolidated case nos. 08-CV-0321 and 08-CV0366, Judge Judith M. Barzilay. 

### ON MOTION

ORDER Upon consideration of US Magnesium LLC's unopposed motion to amend the protective order ofthe UnitedPSCVSMPO-AVISMA v. 

### us 2 States Court of International Trade to add Ashley C. Parrish ofKing & Spalding LLP, IT Is ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. 

# JlL 18 2011 Date

cc: John M. Gurley, Esq.


### s21 Stephen A. Jones, Esq. Renee Gerber, Esq. FOR THE COURT /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk 

### FILED 1iI.S. COURTOFAPPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT 

### JUL 182011

JANHORBALY 

## CLERK
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “ExchangeAct”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Nancy J. Baker, Chief Financial Officer of Cymer,Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Registrant”), hereby certifies that, to thebest of her knowledge:

1.               The Registrant’sannual report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006, to whichthis certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the “Report”), fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act; and

2.               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

**InWitness Whereof**, the undersigned has set her hand hereto asof the 28th day of February, 2007.
| /s/ Nancy J. Baker                      |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|
| Nancy J. Baker, Chief Financial Officer |

 

 This certification accompanies annual reporton the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into anyfiling of Cymer, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after thedate of the annual report on Form 10-K to which it relates), irrespective ofany general incorporation language contained in such filing.

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We have issued our report dated February 8, 2002, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements included in the Annual Report of AVIDYN, Inc. on Form
10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2001. We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of
AVIDYN, Inc. on Forms S-3 (File No. 333-84367, 333-69363, 333-47781, 333-05025,
33-97646, 33-97646, 33-58334-FW, 33-32532, 33-91278 and 333-62306) and on Forms
S-8 (File No. 33-97648, 33-97650, 33-89436, 33-89436, 33-89438, 33-370301 and
33-89440).



GRANT THORNTON, LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 28, 2002
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5086

Enerpac:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6599

Alps Electric (North America), Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
##### 



Exhibit 10.4
 THE SECURITIES REPRESENTED HEREBY HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE UNITED STATES SECURITIES ACT
OF 1933, AS AMENDED, AND MAY NOT BE SOLD, TRANSFERRED, ASSIGNED, PLEDGED, OR HYPOTHECATED ABSENT AN
EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION THEREOF UNDER SUCH ACT OR COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 144 PROMULGATED UNDER SUCH
ACT, OR UNLESS THE COMPANY HAS RECEIVED AN OPINION OF COUNSEL, IN FORM AND SUBSTANCE REASONABLY
SATISFACTORY TO THE COMPANY AND ITS COUNSEL AND FROM ATTORNEYS REASONABLY ACCEPTABLE TO THE COMPANY
AND ITS COUNSEL, THAT SUCH REGISTRATION IS NOT REQUIRED.
 PROMISSORY NOTE
  Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars
15% NOTE
 FOR VALUE RECEIVED, U.S. HELICOPTER CORPORATION PORTFOLIO LENDERS II, LLC TWO HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS AND 00/100 ($250,000.00)




---



##### 



CONVERSION RIGHTS
 DEFAULT
    REMEDIES UPON EVENT OF DEFAULT
     2




---



##### 



REGISTRATION RIGHTS
 CHANGES; PARTIES
 WAIVER OF PRESENTMENT.
 MAXIMUM RATE OF INTEREST
 NO IMPLIED WAIVER
 GOVERNING LAW
 3




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
 U.S. HELICOPTER CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ John G. MurphyJohn G. MurphyChief Executive Officer and President 4
#### Christian Gale EBERSPACHER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 51785.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

June 18, 1996.

Judith LaRose, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Kurt V. Schaefer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before LOWENSTEIN, P.J., and HANNA and SPINDEN, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).