alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Health Industries Holdings, Inc. a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Xin Sun, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/Xin SunXin SunChief Executive OfficerDate:  May 23, 2011
<PAGE>
 
                                  EXHIBIT 23.1
                                        
                          PEERLESS SYSTEMS CORPORATION

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
Peerless Systems Corporation on Form S-8 (File No. 000-21287) of our reports
dated March 12, 1998 on our audits of the financial statements and financial
statement schedule of Peerless Systems Corporation as of and for the years ended
January 31, 1998 and 1997, the one month period ended January 31, 1996 and the
year ended December 31, 1995, which reports are included in this 1998 Annual
Report on Form 10-K.


COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

Newport Beach, California
April 23, 1998
**EXHIBIT 32.01**

**Section 1350 Certification**

In connection with thisquarterly report of ML Cornerstone FuturesAccess LLC (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I, Benjamin C. Weston, ChiefExecutive Officer and Presidentof Merrill Lynch Alternative Investments LLC, the manager of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. This Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2. The informationcontained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: May 15, 2007 |   |
|--------------------|--------|

 
| By                                    | /s/ BENJAMIN C. WESTON |   |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------|--------|
| Benjamin C. Weston                    |
| Chief Executive Officer and President |
| (Principal Executive Officer)         |

 

1

----
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4976 

To protect minors from premature waiver of their constitutional rights during 

a custodial interrogation, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 27, 2023 

Mr. CA ́RDENAS (for himself, Ms. KAMLAGER-DOVE, Mr. TRONE, Ms. NORTON, 

Ms. ROSS, Mr. ESPAILLAT, and Mr. IVEY) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To protect minors from premature waiver of their constitutional rights during a custodial interrogation, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Miranda 

5 Rights for Kids Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. WAIVER OF MIRANDA RIGHTS BY A MINOR. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 223 of title 18, United 

8 States Code, is amended by inserting after section 3051 

9 the following: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4976 IH

1 ‘‘§ 3501A. Custodial interrogation of a minor 

2 ‘‘(a) NOTIFICATION.—Any law enforcement officer 

3 who has arrested a minor for a violation of law shall notify 

4 the minor’s parent, guardian, or legal custodian that the 

5 minor has been arrested and shall provide the location of 

6 where the minor is being detained. 

7 ‘‘(b) WAIVER.—A minor who is subject to a custodial 

8 interrogation may only waive the privilege against self-in9 crimination or the right to assistance of legal counsel if 

10 the minor consults with legal counsel in person before such 

11 waiver. 

12 ‘‘(c) EXCEPTION.—Subsection (a) shall not apply 

13 if— 

14 ‘‘(1) custodial interrogation of a minor is nec15 essary to gather information to protect life from an 

16 imminent threat; and 

17 ‘‘(2) the questions that were asked during the 

18 custodial interrogation were reasonably necessary to 

19 obtain such information. 

20 ‘‘(d) ASSIGNED COUNSEL.— 

21 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—A minor who is subject to 

22 a custodial interrogation shall have the right to have 

23 the legal counsel assigned to the minor’s case phys24 ically present during such interrogation. 

25 ‘‘(2) VIOLATION.—In the case of custodial in26 terrogation of a minor, it shall be a violation of this 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4976 IH

1 subsection for the minor to be represented by any 

2 substitute counsel temporarily assigned to represent 

3 the minor. 

4 ‘‘(e) INADMISSIBLE.—In any criminal prosecution 

5 brought by the United States, any statement given by a 

6 minor during a custodial interrogation that does not com7 ply with this section, and any evidence derived from that 

8 statement, shall be inadmissible. 

9 ‘‘(f) MINOR DEFINED.—In this section, the term 

10 ‘minor’ means an individual who has not attained 18 years 

11 of age.’’. 

12 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

13 for chapter 223 of title 18, United States Code, is amend14 ed by inserting after the item relating to section 3501 the 

15 following item: 

‘‘3501A. Custodial interrogation of a minor.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 2, 2020

No. 04-19-00645-CR

Lonnie Jerome James ELLISON,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR10112C

Honorable Catherine Torres-Stahl, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s first motion for an extension of time to file his brief is GRANTED. 

Appellant’s brief is due on or before April 27, 2020.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 2nd day of April, 2020.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ,

Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5449 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5449

 To amend title 18, United States Code, to make fraudulent dealings in 
       firearms and ammunition unlawful, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 13, 2023

   Ms. Scanlon (for herself, Mr. Ryan, and Mr. Evans) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 18, United States Code, to make fraudulent dealings in 
       firearms and ammunition unlawful, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stopping the Fraudulent Sales of 
Firearms Act''.

SEC. 2. FRAUDULENT DEALINGS IN FIREARMS.

    (a) In General.--Section 922(a) of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in paragraph (9), by striking the period and at the end 
        and inserting ``; and''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(10) for any person--
                    ``(A) to import, manufacture, or sell a firearm or 
                ammunition by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, 
                representations, or promises; and
                    ``(B) to transmit or cause to be transmitted, by 
                means of wire, radio, or television communication in 
                interstate or foreign commerce, any communication 
                relating to the importation, manufacture, or sale 
                described in subparagraph (A).''.
    (b) Penalty.--Section 924(a)(1)(B) of title 18, United States Code, 
is amended by inserting ``(a)(10),'' before ``(f)''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Brampton Textiles, Ltd., Respondent, v Argenti, Inc., Appellant.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Baer, Jr., J.), entered January 12, 1989, which directed the entry of judgment against the defendant in the amount of $90,525.26 upon a jury verdict, and severed the cause of action for attorneys’ fees, unanimously affirmed with costs.

Plaintiff commenced this action to recover for defendant’s breach of a contract for the sale of a quantity of fabric, which defendant refused to pay for on the ground that the fabric was defective. We find no error in the court’s instruction to the jury that two documents signed by the parties, which disclaimed all warranties for "novelty fabrics”, constituted the agreement of the parties, and that such other terms as were contained in defendant’s purchase were not controlling. Nor did the court err in refusing a request to charge the jury on UCC 2-719 (2). While a contract for the sale of goods, by virtue of that section, must provide a fair quantum of remedies for breach, nothing in that section precludes parties to a contract from disclaiming remedies, or more particularly, precludes a seller of goods from excluding implied warranties. *(See,*UCC 2-316.) The court, therefore, properly charged the jury not to consider the alleged defects in the fabrics. In any event, the jury in fact found, in response to a special interrogatory, that the goods were not defective, and we therefore see no prejudice to the defendant if indeed any error had occurred. The court’s charge conveyed to the jury that their determination *315whether the goods were defective was a question distinct from whether there had been a breach of the contract. Concur— Kupferman, J. P., Carro, Milonas and Smith, JJ.
PUBLIC VERSION
$[*********] [******]

$[*********]

INPUT

20.0

$[*********]

[******]

[******]

0.05

PUBLIC VERSION
Consistent with USTR's Section 301 notice, OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. requests

confidential treatment for the information designated as business confidential in this submission. Such

information consists of information that would not customarily be released to the public, including

business or trade secrets regarding production costs and processes, data on sales, product characteristics

customers, destinations, and other product, sales, and cost-related business secrets. Business confidential

information has been indicated herein by enclosing it in single brackets (“[ ]”). A public version of these

comments is also being filed with all confidential information removed.

OMRON in the US is the only designer of this product and only supplier of this component.

CASE,UPPER 3BTN RVSS is a molded plastic switch case, and is used only for automotive purposes to

house switches in a key fob, of which is an OEM-specified dimension. It is only used for further

assembly of components which go into domestic automobile production, which is specified by auto

manufacturer.

This product is not a target of the US Administration's 301 investigation regarding Intellectual Property

concerns. This is not a concern to IP transfer and impressment. This product contains no IP of interest

related to autonomous vehicle production.

The tariff action ultimately poses a risk of significant damage to OMRON, the domestic automobile

industry, and ultimately the US consumer as a increase in price. Like in the case of similar approvals for

vehicle components at the HTS level, OMRON views this product in the same manner. Immediate

movement of production to a US manufacturer or another country would pose significant re-tooling

costs, significant amounts of time, and approvals pertaining to consumer automobile safety standards are

costly and would take a significant amount of time to obtain.

OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. believes that CBP can easily exclude the CASE,UPPER

3BTN RVSS in question based solely on the product description. The following are draft CBP exclusion

instructions:

"CASE,UPPER 3BTN RVSS P Lucky Plastic "pear-shaped" raised edge flat molding with five button

holes hollowed out; two arranged next two each other at the top and two arranged on top of each other

below, and a fifth hollow hole at the bottom "Plastic case for REMOTE FUNCTION ACTUATOR -

made of resin - ABS+PC" Dimensions 42m x57.23mm x8.12mm."

This information will be contained on the invoice from the supplier.

PUBLIC VERSION
**Exhibit 21.1**

**SUBSIDIARIESOF STATION CASINOS, INC.**

PalaceStation Hotel & Casino, Inc.

BoulderStation, Inc.

TexasStation, LLC

SunsetStation, Inc.

SantaFe Station, Inc.

FiestaStation, Inc.

RanchoStation, LLC

LakeMead Station, Inc.

TropicanaStation, Inc.

CharlestonStation, LLC

MagicStar Station, LLC

GoldRush Station, LLC

LMLStation, LLC

PalmStation, LLC

FiestaPalms, LLC (6.7% ownership)

GreenValley Station, Inc.:

TownCenter Amusements, Inc.

d.b.a.Barley’s Casino & Brewing Company (50% ownership)

GreensCafé, LLC

d.b.aThe Greens (50% ownership)

SunsetGV, LLC (50% ownership)

GVRanch Station, Inc.:

GVRanch Station Capital Holdings, LLC (100% ownership)

GreenValley Ranch Gaming, LLC (50% ownership)

AlianteStation, LLC:

AlianteHolding, LLC (50% ownership)

DurangoStation, Inc.

FrontStreet Station, LLC

SCRancho Development, LLC:

RanchoRoad, LLC (50% ownership)

StationHoldings, Inc.

TownCenter Station, LLC

CareyStation Holdings, LLC

FiestaStation Holdings, LLC

LakeMead Station Holdings, LLC

VistaHoldings, LLC

CenterlineHoldings, LLC

StationCalifornia, LLC

Station Development, LLC

----
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report of WMG Acquisition Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael D. Fleisher, Chief
Financial Officer of WMG Acquisition Corp., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: August 11, 2005



/s/    MICHAEL D.
FLEISHERMichael D. FleisherChief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 77 (Friday, April 21, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 19864-19865]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9863]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
50 CFR Part 675

[Docket No. 950206040-5040-01, I.D. 041795B]


Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Area; Trawl 
Rock Sole/Flathead Sole/``Other Flatfish'' Fishery Category

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Closure.

----------------------------------------------------------------------- [[Page 19865]] 


SUMMARY: NMFS is closing the directed fishery for species in the rock 
sole/flathead sole/``other flatfish'' fishery category by vessels using 
trawl gear in the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands management area 
(BSAI). This action is necessary to prevent exceeding the second 
seasonal bycatch allowance of Pacific halibut apportioned to the trawl 
rock sole/flathead sole/``other flatfish'' fishery category in the 
BSAI.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 12 noon, Alaska local time (A.l.t.), April 17, 1995, 
until 12 noon, A.l.t., July 1, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew N. Smoker, 907-586-7228.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The groundfish fishery in the BSAI exclusive 
economic zone is managed by NMFS according to the Fishery Management 
Plan for the Groundfish Fishery of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands 
Area (FMP) prepared by the North Pacific Fishery Management Council 
under authority of the Magnuson Fishery Conservation and Management 
Act. Fishing by U.S. vessels is governed by regulations implementing 
the FMP at 50 CFR parts 620 and 675.
    The second seasonal bycatch allowance of Pacific halibut for the 
BSAI trawl rock sole/flathead sole/``other flatfish'' fishery category, 
which is defined at Sec. 675.21(b)(1)(iii)(B)(2), was established as 
180 metric tons by the final 1995 specifications of groundfish (60 FR 
8479, February 14, 1995).
    The Director, Alaska Region, NMFS, has determined, in accordance 
with Sec. 675.21(c)(1)(iii), that the second seasonal bycatch allowance 
of Pacific halibut apportioned to the trawl rock sole/flathead sole/
``other flatfish'' fishery in the BSAI has been caught. Therefore, NMFS 
is prohibiting directed fishing for species in the rock sole/flathead 
sole/``other flatfish'' fishery category by vessels using trawl gear in 
the BSAI.
    Directed fishing standards for applicable gear types may be found 
in the regulations at Sec. 675.20(h).

Classification

    This action is taken under 50 CFR 675.21 and is exempt from review 
under E.O. 12866.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: April 17, 1995.
Richard W. Surdi,
Acting Director, Office of Fisheries Conservation and Management, 
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 95-9863 Filed 4-17-95; 4:53 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
Order filed June 24 , 20 21

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 21

- 00143

- CV

____________ RUHUL AMIN PARVEZ AHMED , Appellant

V.

KHALEDA PARVIN , Appellee

On Appeal from the 505 th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 19

- DCV

- 264584



### ORDER
This appeal is from an order signed March 8 , 20 21 by the district judge denying a de novo hearing of the order signed February 8, 2021 by the associate judge denying appellant’s December 9, 2020 and /or January 12, 202 1 motion to set
aside the “default judgment” based on no notice of the October 1, 2020 trial setting

. A final divorce decree was signed on December 15, 2020

. Appellant filed a notice of appeal on March 15 , 20 21 . Appellant filed a Statement of Inability to Afford Payment of Court Costs or an Appeal Bond in the trial court. “ A party who files aStatement of Inability to Afford Payment of Court Costs cannot be re quired to pay

costs except by order of the court as provided by this rule .” See Tex. R. Civ . P. 145(a)

. Appellant has not been ordered to pay costs pursuant to Rule 145. Accordingly, Appellant is hereby deemed indigent for purposes of this appeal.

PER CUR IAM
Panel Consists of Justices Wise, Jewell, and Spain.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report, or the Report, of Universal Truckload Services, Inc., or the Company, on Form 10-Q for the period
ended April 3, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Donald B. Cochran, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Robert E. Sigler, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, respectively, that (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 11, 2010



/s/ Donald B. CochranDonald B. CochranPresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Robert E. SiglerRobert E. SiglerVice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v.Jimmy BLANK, Appellant. Jimmy W. BLANK, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. WD 47895, WD 49594.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

May 9, 1995.

Judith C. LaRose, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Mary Moulton Bryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before FENNER, C.J., P.J., and BRECKENRIDGE and HANNA, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appeal of convictions after trial by jury of one count of felony stealing, § 570,030, RSMo 1994; three counts of misdemeanor stealing, § 570.030, RSMo 1994; one count of misdemeanor possession of marijuana, § 195.202.3, RSMo 1994; and one count of misdemeanor possession of drug paraphernalia, § 195.233, RSMo 1994, and the denial of appellant’s Rule 29.15 posteonviction motion.

*236Judgments affirmed. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
Exhibit 99

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors and Shareholders

Dimeco, Inc.

We have audited the consolidated statements of financial
condition of Dimeco, Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operation, changes in stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2007. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An
audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Dimeco, Inc.
and subsidiary as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the consolidated results of their operations and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles.

We were not engaged to examine managements assertion about the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2007, included in the accompanying Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion thereon.



|                        
|------------------------
|                        
|/s/ S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.
|Wexford, Pennsylvania   
|March 10, 2008