alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5516 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the employment and 

reemployment rights of members of the uniformed services to other law. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 14, 2023 

Mr. TAKANO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the employment and reemployment rights of members of the uniformed services to other law. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATIONS REGARDING SCOPE OF EM4 PLOYMENT AND REEMPLOYMENT RIGHTS OF 

5 MEMBERS OF THE UNIFORMED SERVICES. 

6 (a) CLARIFICATION REGARDING DEFINITION OF

7 RIGHTS AND BENEFITS.—Section 4303(2) of title 38, 

8 United States Code, is amended— 

9 (1) by inserting ‘‘—’’ after ‘‘ ‘rights and bene10 fits’ ’’; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5516 IH

1 (2) by redesignating the text beginning with 

2 ‘‘means’’ and ending with ‘‘employment.’’ as a sub3 paragraph (A); 

4 (3) in such subparagraph (A), as so redesig5 nated, by striking the period at the end and insert6 ing ‘‘; and’’; and 

7 (4) by adding at the end the following new sub8 paragraph: 

9 ‘‘(B) includes any procedural protections or 

10 provisions set forth in this chapter.’’. 

11 (b) CLARIFICATION REGARDING RELATION TO

12 OTHER LAW AND PLANS FOR AGREEMENTS.—Section 

13 4302 of such title is amended by adding at the end the 

14 following: 

15 ‘‘(c)(1) Pursuant to this section and the procedural 

16 rights afforded by subchapter III of this chapter, any 

17 agreement to arbitrate a claim under this chapter is unen18 forceable, unless all parties consent to arbitration after a 

19 complaint on the specific claim has been filed in court or 

20 with the Merit Systems Protection Board and all parties 

21 knowingly and voluntarily consent to have that particular 

22 claim subjected to arbitration. 

23 ‘‘(2) For purposes of this subsection, consent shall 

24 not be considered voluntary when a person is required to 

25 agree to arbitrate an action, complaint, or claim alleging 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 5516 IH

1 a violation of this chapter as a condition of future or con2 tinued employment, advancement in employment, or re3 ceipt of any right or benefit of employment.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
#### COMMONWEALTH LLOYD’S INSURANCE COMPANY & United States Fire Insurance Company, Petitioners, v. CULLEN/FROST BANK OF DALLAS, N.A., Respondent.

No. D-3782.

Supreme Court of Texas.

May 11, 1994.

Kevin J. Cook, Dallas, for petitioners.

Jerome H. Ferguson, III and Joseph E. Burns, Dallas, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

In this declaratory judgment action, Cullen/Frost Bank (bank) sued Commonwealth Lloyds Insurance Company and United States Fire Insurance Company (insurers) for a determination of the insurers’ duty to defend the bank under five commercial general liability insurance policies. The underlying suit involves claims for recision, negligent. misrepresentation, breach of warranty, and violations of the Deceptive Trade Practices Act, Tex.Bus. & Com.Code Ann. §§ 17.41-17.68 (Vernon 1986 & Supp.1994), by several condominium owners who purchased them condominiums from the bank.

The trial court granted the insurers’ motions for summary judgment, which the court of appeals reversed, 852 S.W.2d 252. We granted the insurers’ applications for writ of error, but a majority of the court now withdraws our order granting the writ and denies the insurers’ applications for writ of error. In doing so, we neither approve nor disapprove of the opinion of the court of appeals.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

April 12, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6761

Apex Sourcing & Manufacturing: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_04.15.19.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXHIBIT 32.1

               CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
                (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lucas Energy, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the three month period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
James J. Cerna, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ JAMES J. CERNA
-------------------------------------
James J. Cerna
President and Chief Executive Officer

November 9, 2007
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Ian C. BITTICK, Appellant.

Nos. WD 47587, WD 50425.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Nov. 28, 1995.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Jan. 30, 1996.

Application to Transfer Denied March 26, 1996.

Rebecca L. Kurz, Asst. Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Becky Owenson Kilpatrick, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before LAURA DENVIR STITH, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and HANNA, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The defendant was convicted of three counts of sodomy (§ 566.060, RSMo Supp. 1992), and sentenced to a total of 35 years. Defendant appeals from his convictions and the denial of his Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion after an evidentiary hearing.

The judgments are affirmed. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4483

CW Bearing USA, Inc:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Paul A. HALDEMAN, Appellant.

No. 66388.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

Sept. 26, 1995.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 30, 1995.

Application to Transfer Denied Dec. 19, 1995.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Mary Moulton Bryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Robert J. Maurer, Anthony L. Anderson, Anderson & Preuss, Clayton, for appellant.

Before AHRENS, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and GRIMM, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his judgment of conviction of sexual assault in the first degree in violation of RSMo § 566.040. Defendant was sentenced to seven years imprisonment.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).
EXHIBIT 99.01


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Phoenix Leasing American  Business Fund,
L.P. (the  "Partnership") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I,  Gus  Constantin,  President  of the  General  Partner,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
              material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  results  of
              operations of the Partnership.

                                                        /S/GUS CONSTANTIN
                                                        -----------------
                                                        Gus Constantin
                                                        President
                                                        March 28, 2003
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Michael D. Queen, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Universal Capital Management, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: September 11, 2009

/s/ Michael D. Queen             

Michael D. Queen,

Chief Executive Officer
----

----

**Exhibit        32.1**

**Certifications        Pursuant to**

**Section        906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(18        U.S.C. Section 1350)**

|   | (1) | the                  report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                  information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                                                                        |   |   |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/                  Kenneth J.                  Koock                                                                                                                      |   |   |   |   |
| Name:                  Kenneth J.                  KoockTitle:                    Chief Executive Officer and                    Chief                    Financial Officer |   |   |   |   |
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 77 (Friday, April 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 19918]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9901]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

First National of Nebraska, Inc.; Notice of Application to Engage 
de novo in Permissible Nonbanking Activities

    The company listed in this notice has filed an application under 
Sec.  225.23(a)(1) of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.23(a)(1)) 
for the Board's approval under section 4(c)(8) of the Bank Holding 
Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843(c)(8)) and Sec.  225.21(a) of Regulation Y 
(12 CFR 225.21(a)) to commence or to engage de novo, either directly or 
through a subsidiary, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in Sec.  
225.25 of Regulation Y as closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, such activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    The application is available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. Once the application has been accepted 
for processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing on the question whether consummation of the proposal can 
``reasonably be expected to produce benefits to the public, such as 
greater convenience, increased competition, or gains in efficiency, 
that outweigh possible adverse effects, such as undue concentration of 
resources, decreased or unfair competition, conflicts of interests, or 
unsound banking practices.'' Any request for a hearing on this question 
must be accompanied by a statement of the reasons a written 
presentation would not suffice in lieu of a hearing, identifying 
specifically any questions of fact that are in dispute, summarizing the 
evidence that would be presented at a hearing, and indicating how the 
party commenting would be aggrieved by approval of the proposal.
    Comments regarding the application must be received at the Reserve 
Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than 
May 5, 1995.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (John E. Yorke, Senior Vice 
President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64198:
    1. First National of Nebraska, Inc., Omaha, Nebraska; to engage de 
novo through its subsidiary Premier Payment Processing, Inc. Omaha, 
Nebraska, in courier activities, pursuant to Sec.  225.25(b)(10) of the 
Board's Regulation Y, and data processing activities, pursuant to Sec.  
225.25(b)(7) of the Board's Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 17, 
1995.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-9901 Filed 4-20-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 103 (Tuesday, June 1, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 29263]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-11487]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than July 1, 2021.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland (Mary S. Johnson, Vice 
President) 1455 East Sixth Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44101-2566. Comments 
can also be sent electronically to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#31725e5c5c545f45421f5041415d58525045585e5f4271525d54471f5743531f5e4356"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b0f3dfddddd5dec4c39ed1c0c0dcd9d3d1c4d9dfdec3f0d3dcd5c69ed6c2d29edfc2d7">[email protected]</span></a>:
    1. Peoples Bancorp, Inc., Marietta, Ohio; to acquire Premier 
Financial Bancorp, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire Premier Bank, 
Inc., both of Huntington, West Virginia and Citizens Deposit and Trust, 
Inc., Vanceburg, Kentucky.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. First Bancorp of Taylorville, Inc., Taylorville, Illinois; to 
merge with Mackinaw Valley Financial Services, Inc., and thereby 
indirectly acquire First Security Bank, both of Mackinaw, Illinois.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 26, 2021.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2021-11487 Filed 5-28-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>