19194 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 73 / Monday, April 17, 1995 / Proposed Rules

Technical Reclamation Memorandum

#21 and stocking densities set in section

6(2)(b)1, or optionally to use species and

stocking densities recommended

specifically for the permit area by the

Kentucky Department of Fish and

Wildlife Resources. Sections 9(3)(c) and

9(6), regarding use of productivity test

areas rather than statistical evaluation of

productivity, are being deleted.

III. Public Comment Procedures

Written Comments

OSM is reopening the comment

period on the proposed Kentucky

program amendment to provide the

public an opportunity to reconsider the

adequacy of the proposed amendment

in light of the additional materials

submitted. In accordance with the

provisions of 30 CFR 732.17(h), OSM is

seeking comments on whether the

proposed amendment satisfies the

applicable program approval criteria of

30 CFR 732.15. If the amendment is

deemed adequate, it will become part of

the Kentucky program.

Written comments should be specific,

pertain only to the issues proposed in

this rulemaking, and include

explanations in support of the

commenter’s recommendations.

Comments received after the time

indicated under DATES or at locations

other than the Lexington Field Office

will not necessarily be considered in the

final rulemaking or included in the

administrative record.

IV. Procedural Determinations

Executive Order 12866

This rule is exempted from review by

the Office of Management and Budget

(OMB) under Executive Order 12866

(Regulatory Planning and Review).

Executive Order 12778

The Department of the Interior has

conducted the reviews required by

Section 2 of Executive Order 12778

(Civil Justice Reform) and has

determined that this rule meets the

applicable standards of subsections (a)

and (b) of that section. However, these

standards are not applicable to the

actual language of State regulatory

programs and program amendments

since each such program is drafted and

promulgated by a specific State, not by

OSM. Under Sections 503 and 505 of

SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1253 and 12550) and

the Federal regulations at 30 CFR

730.11, 732.15, and 732.17(h)(10),

decisions on proposed State regulatory

programs and program amendments

submitted by the States must be based

solely on a determination of whether the

submittal is consistent with SMCRA and

its implementing Federal regulations

and whether the other requirements of

30 CRR parts 730, 731, and 732 have

been met.

National Environmental Policy Act

No environmental impact statement is

required for this rule since Section

702(d) of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1292(d))

provides that agency decisions on

proposed State regulatory program

provisions do not constitute major

Federal actions within the meaning of

Section 102(2)(C) of the National

Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.

4332(2)(C)).

Paperwork Reduction Act

This rule does not contain

information collection requirements that

require approval by OMB under the

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.

3507 et seq.).

Regulatory Flexibility Act

The Department of the Interior has

determined that this rule will not have

a significant economic impact on a

substantial number of small entities

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5

U.S.C. 601 et seq.). The State submittal

that is the subject of this rule is based

upon counterpart Federal regulations for

which an economic analysis was

prepared and certification made that

such regulations would not have a

significant economic effect upon a

substantial number of small entities.

Accordingly, this rule will ensure that

existing requirements previously

promulgated by OSM will be

implemented by the State. In making the

determination as to whether this rule

would have a significant economic

impact, the Department relied upon the

data and assumptions for the

counterpart Federal regulations.

List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 917

Intergovernmental relations, Surface

mining, Underground mining.

Dated: April 10, 1995.

Richard J. Seibel,

Acting Assistant Director, Eastern Support

Center.

[FR Doc. 95–9388 Filed 4–14–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–05–M

30 CFR Part 935

[OH–204; Amendment No. 54R]

Ohio Regulatory and AML Programs

AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining

Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM),

Interior.

ACTION: Proposed rule; reopening and

extension of public comment period.

SUMMARY: OSM is reopening the public

comment period for a revised

amendment to the Ohio permanent

regulatory and Abandoned Mined Land

(AML) programs (hereinafter referred to

as the Ohio programs) under the Surface

Mining Control and Reclamation Act of

1977. The revised amendment proposes

additional changes to ten sections of the

Ohio Revised Code (ORC) to clarify

those sections of State law, to conform

those sections to current State practices,

and to make those sections equivalent to

corresponding Federal laws. The

proposed revisions concern lands

eligible for remining, public roadways,

average wage rates, deletion of obsolete

language on interim continuance of

underground coal mining operations,

activities eligible for Small Operator

Assistance, refund of excess permit fees

to operators, use of the Reclamation

Supplemental Forfeiture Fund for noncoal reclamation, interfund transfers,

and required staff training.

This document sets forth the times

and locations that the Ohio programs

and the proposed amendments to those

programs will be available for public

inspection, the comment period during

which interested persons may submit

written comments on the proposed

amendments, and the procedures that

will be followed regarding the public

hearing, if one is requested.

DATES: Written comments must be

received on or before 4:00 p.m., e.d.t. on

May 17, 1995. If requested, a public

hearing on the proposed amendments

will be held at 1:00 p.m., e.d.t. on May

12, 1995. Requests to speak at the

hearing must be received on or before

4:00 p.m., e.d.t. on May 2, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Written comments and

requests to speak at the hearing should

be mailed or hand-delivered to Mr.

Robert H. Mooney, Acting Director,

Columbus Field Office, at the address

listed below.

Copies of the Ohio programs, the

proposed amendments, and all written

comments received in response to this

document will be available for public

review at the addresses listed below

during normal business hours, Monday

through Friday, excluding holidays.

Each requester may receive one free

copy of the proposed amendments by

contacting OSM’s Columbus Field

Office.

Office of Surface Mining Reclamation

and Enforcement, Columbus Field

Office, 4480 Refugee Road, Suite 201,

Columbus, Ohio 43232, Telephone:

(614) 866–0578.
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 73 / Monday, April 17, 1995 / Proposed Rules 19195

Ohio Department of Natural Resources,

Division of Reclamation, 1855

Fountain Square Court, Building H–3,

Columbus, Ohio 43224, Telephone:

(614) 265–6675.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Robert H. Mooney, Acting Director,

Columbus Field Office, (614) 866–0578.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background on the Ohio Program

On August 16, 1982, the Secretary of

the Interior conditionally approved the

Ohio programs. Information on the

general background of the Ohio program

submissions, including the Secretary’s

findings, the disposition of comments,

and a detailed explanation of the

conditions of approval of the Ohio

programs, can be found in the August

10, 1982, Federal Register (47 FR

34688). Subsequent actions concerning

the conditions of approval and program

amendments are identified at 30 CFR

935.11, 935.12, 935.15, and 935.16.

II. Description of the Proposed

Amendments

By letter dated February 7, 1992

(Administrative Record No. OH–1645),

the Ohio Department of Natural

Resources, Division of Reclamation

(Ohio) submitted proposed Program

Amendment Number 54 (PA 54). In PA

54, Ohio proposed to revise 13 sections

of the ORC concerning a number of

regulatory and AML issues. OSM

announced receipt of PA 54 in the April

13, 1992, Federal Register (57 FR

12779), and in the same notice, opened

the public comment period and

provided opportunity for a public

hearing on the adequacy of the proposed

amendment. The public comment

period ended on May 13, 1992.

By letter dated June 15, 1992

(Administrative Record No. OH–1714),

OSM provided Ohio with its questions

and comments about the February 7,

1992, submission of PA 54. On July 20,

1992, OSM and Ohio staff met to

discuss and resolve OSM’s questions

and comments (Administrative Record

No. OH–1746). On July 28, 1992, OSM

and Ohio staff further resolved some of

those issues in a telephone conversation

(Administrative Record No. OH–1754).

In response to OSM’s June 15, 1992,

letter, Ohio submitted Revised Program

Amendment Number 54 (PA 54R) by

letter dated September 2, 1992

(Administrative Record No. OH–1769).

PA 54R contained further revisions to

seven sections of the ORC. OSM

announced receipt of PA 54R in the

October 28, 1992, Federal Register (57

FR 48765), and in the same notice,

opened the public comment period and

provided opportunity for a public

hearing on the adequacy of the proposed

amendment. The public comment

period ended on November 27, 1992.

On December 16, 1992

(Administrative Record No. OH–1800),

OSM and Ohio staff conducted a

telephone discussion of the September

2, 1992, resubmission of PA 54R. On

April 30, 1993, OSM and Ohio staff met

informally to discuss the status of the

amendment with respect to the State’s

legislative process.

In the June 11, 1993, Federal Register

(58 FR 32611), the Director of OSM

announced his decision to defer Ohio

PA 54R with the exception of the

Director’s approval of one proposed

change at ORC section 1513.02(F)(3)

which the Ohio General Assembly was

likely to pass in its current form. The

Director made this decision because the

Ohio Legislative Service Commission

had not yet drafted the final statutory

language on which PA 54R would

ultimately be based and because that

language would not be available for

review by OSM within the foreseeable

future.

By letter dated March 31, 1995

(Administrative Record No. OH–2107),

Ohio submitted the final version of PA

54R. This final version contains the

statutory changes approved by the Ohio

General Assembly in Senate Bill 180

and in House Bill 414. The two bills

were signed by the Ohio Governor on

December 23, 1992, and December 27,

1994, respectively. The revised statutes

went into effect on March 24, 1993, and

March 27, 1995, respectively.

Ohio’s March 31, 1995, final

submission of PA 54R reiterates many of

the statute changes previously proposed

in PA 54 and PA 54R. The new

submission also proposes new changes

to ten sections of the ORC. OSM

discussed the previously proposed

changes in the April 13 and October 28,

1992, Federal Register documents

concerning the previous submissions of

PA 54 and PA 54R. Therefore, only

newly proposed substantive changes to

Ohio’s coal regulatory and AML

program statutes are discussed below.

Statute changes which solely concern

Ohio’s non-coal regulatory program are

outside the jurisdiction of OSM and are

not discussed below. Newly proposed

changes to paragraph notations and

other nonsubstantive wording changes

which are intended solely to clarify the

statutes are also not discussed below.

(1) Lands Eligible for Remining

ORC section 1513.01 paragraph (F):

Ohio is adding this paragraph to define

the term ‘‘lands eligible for remining’’ to

mean those lands that otherwise would

be eligible for expenditure of AML

reclamation funds under paragraph

(C)(1) of ORC section 1513.37.

ORC section 1513.07 paragraph

(E)(3)(b): Ohio is adding this new

paragraph to provide that, until October

1, 2004, any violation resulting from an

unanticipated event or condition at a

surface coal mining operation on lands

eligible for remining shall not prevent

issuance of a coal mining permit to the

person holding the remining permit. An

unanticipated event or condition is one

that was not contemplated by the

applicable permit.

ORC section 1513.16 paragraph

(A)(19)(b): Ohio is adding this new

paragraph to provide that coal mining

permits on lands eligible for remining

shall require the operator to assume the

responsibility for successful

revegetation of the remined area for two

full years after the last augmented

seeding, fertilizing, or irrigation.

ORC section 1513.37 paragraph (C)(3):

Ohio is adding this new paragraph to

provide that surface coal mining

operations on lands eligible for

remining shall not affect the eligibility

of those lands for AML reclamation

funding under this section of the ORC

after the release of the mining

operation’s performance bond. If the

performance bond for the remining

operation is forfeited and is not

sufficient for adequate reclamation of

the site, Ohio may use AML reclamation

funding under this section to augment

the bond.

(2) Public Roadways

ORC section 1513.01 paragraph (H)(2):

Ohio is revising this paragraph to delete

the existing exclusion of public

roadways from the areas covered by the

definitions of ‘‘operation’’ or ‘‘coal

mining operation.’’

(3) Average Wage Rates

ORC section 1513.02 paragraph (J):

Ohio is revising this paragraph to

provide that the State will use

information from non-coal as well as

coal mining and reclamation operations

in calculating average wage rates. The

newly calculated average wage rates

shall apply to reclamation performed for

Ohio on both coal and non-coal mining

sites.

(4) Deletion of Obsolete Language

ORC section 1513.07 paragraph (A)(1):

Ohio is deleting additional obsolete

language from this paragraph

concerning interim continuance of

underground coal mine operations

which were in effect prior to September

1, 1981.
19196 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 73 / Monday, April 17, 1995 / Proposed Rules

(5) Activities Eligible for the Small

Operator’s Assistance Program (SOAP)

ORC section 1513.07 paragraph (B)(4)

(a) and (b): Ohio is revising these

paragraphs to expand the types of

activities related to permit applications

which qualified laboratories can

perform for permit applicants under

contracts funded by Ohio’s SOAP.

Qualifying activities include

determination of probable hydrologic

consequences, development of crosssection maps and plans, geologic

drilling and reporting, collection and

reporting of archaeological information,

performing pre-blast surveys, and

collection of information on protection

of fish and wildlife habitats. The coal

mine operator shall reimburse the State

for the costs of SOAP-assisted services

if the operator’s actual and attributed

coal production for all locations exceeds

300,000 tons during the 12 months

immediately following the date of

issuance of the mining permit.

(6) Refund of Excess Permit Fees to

Operators

ORC 1513.10: In February 7, 1992,

submission of PA 54, Ohio proposed to

repeal this existing section which

currently authorizes Ohio to refund

excess permit fees to the operator for

acreage permitted but not subsequently

affected. In its March 31, 1995, cover

letter of the final version of PA 54R,

Ohio noted that it is withdrawing its

proposal to repeal this section.

ORC 1513.07 paragraph (B)(1): Ohio is

deleting previously proposed language

in this paragraph which would have

provided that all excess permit fees

collected by the State shall be deposited

in the State Treasury to the credit of the

Coal Mining Administration and

Reclamation Reserve Fund created in

ORC section 1513.181.

(7) Use of Reclamation Supplemental

Forfeiture Fund for Non-Coal

Reclamation

ORC section 1513.18 paragraph (D): In

the February 7, 1992, submission of PA

54, Ohio proposed to add this new

paragraph (D) which, in part, would

have allowed the Division to use funds

from the Reclamation Supplemental

Forfeiture Fund to reclaim areas which

were affected by mining under non-coal

surface mining permits issued under

ORC Chapter 1514 but which the

operator did not adequately reclaim. In

its March 31, 1995, final version of PA

54R, Ohio is withdrawing this proposed

language concerning non-coal

reclamation from new paragraph (D).

ORC 1514.06 paragraph (G): Ohio is

proposing to revise this paragraph in

lieu of the previously proposed revision

discussed above which Ohio is

withdrawing from ORC section 1513.18

paragraph (D). The revision to ORC

section 1514.06 paragraph (G) would

provide that Ohio may expend money

from the Reclamation Supplemental

Forfeiture Fund or from the Surface

Mining Administration Fund to

complete reclamation on land affected

by non-coal surface mining operations

on which an operator has defaulted.

ORC section 1513.18 paragraph (D):

Ohio is adding a statement in this

paragraph concerning the State’s

priority for management of the

Reclamation Supplemental Forfeiture

Fund, including the selection of projects

and the transfer of moneys. That priority

shall be to ensure that sufficient moneys

are available for reclamation of areas

that an operator has affected under a

coal mining and reclamation permit

issued after September 1, 1981, and

which the operator has failed to reclaim.

(8) Interfund Transfers

ORC 1513.181 paragraph (B): In its

September 2, 1992, submission of PA

54R, Ohio proposed to add this new

paragraph to provide the State with

additional flexibility to manage the

funding of the Coal Mining

Administration and Reclamation

Reserve Fund and the Reclamation

Supplemental Forfeiture Fund. If, at the

close of the fiscal year, the former fund’s

balance is below one million dollars, the

State could have transferred funds of up

to $500,000 per fiscal year from the Coal

Mining Administration and Reclamation

Reserve Fund to the Reclamation

Supplemental Forfeiture Fund. In its

March 31, 1995, final version of PA 54R,

Ohio is withdrawing this proposal

language.

(9) Required Staff Training

ORC section 1513.34: Ohio is revising

this section to delete the requirements

for minimum hourly amounts of initial

and annual follow-up training for

certain staff positions. In lieu of a

minimum of 80 hours of training, Ohio

shall provide adequate training and

education, during their probationary

periods, for all persons appointed as

inspection officers. In lieu of a

minimum of 40 hours of annual

training, Ohio shall provide, on a

regular basis as funding allows,

continuing education and training as

necessary for all inspection officers,

district supervisors, and enforcement

personnel.

III. Public Comment Procedures

In accordance with the provisions of

30 CFR 732.17(h), OSM is now seeking

comment on whether the amendments

proposed by Ohio satisfy the applicable

program approval criteria of 30 CFR

732.15. If the amendments are deemed

adequate, they will become part of the

Ohio programs.

Written Comments

Written comments should be specific,

pertain only to the issues proposed in

this rulemaking, and include

explanations in support of the

commenter’s recommendations.

Comments received after the time

indicated under DATES or at locations

other than the Columbus Field Office

will not necessarily be considered in the

final rulemaking or included in the

Administrative Record.

Public Hearing

Persons wishing to comment at the

public hearing should contact the

person listed under FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT by 4:00 p.m., e.d.t.

on May 2, 1995. If no one requests an

opportunity to comment at a public

hearing, the hearing will not be held.

Filing of a written statement at the

time of the hearing is requested as it

will greatly assist the transcriber.

Submission of written statements in

advance of the hearing will allow OSM

officials to prepare adequate responses

and appropriate questions. The public

hearing will continue on the specified

date until all persons scheduled to

comment have been heard. Persons in

the audience who have not been

scheduled to comment and who wish to

do so will be heard following those

scheduled. The hearing will end after all

persons scheduled to comment and

persons present in the audience who

wish to comment have been heard.

Any disabled individual who has

need for a special accommodation to

attend a public hearing should contact

the individual listed under FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT.

Public Meeting

If only one person requests an

opportunity to comment at a hearing, a

public meeting, rather than a public

hearing, may be held. Persons wishing

to meet with OSM representatives to

discuss the proposed amendments may

request a meeting at the Columbus Field

Office by contacting the person listed

under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT. All such meetings shall be

open to the public and, if possible,

notices of the meetings will be posted at

the locations listed under ADDRESSES. A

written summary of each public meeting

will be made a part of the

Administrative Record.
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 73 / Monday, April 17, 1995 / Proposed Rules 19197

List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 935

Intergovernmental relations, Surface

mining, Underground mining.

Dated: April 10, 1995.

Richard J. Seibel,

Acting Assistant Director, Eastern Support

Center.

[FR Doc. 95–9389 Filed 4–14–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–05–M

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Parts 52 and 81

[NC–061–1–6815; FRL–5191–3]

Proposed Approval and Promulgation

of Implementation Plans and

Designation of Areas for Air Quality

Planning Purposes; State of North

Carolina

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: On November 12, 1993, the

State of North Carolina through the

North Carolina Department of

Environment, Health, and Natural

Resources submitted a maintenance

plan and a request to redesignate the

Charlotte-Gastonia area from

nonattainment to attainment for ozone

(O3). Subsequently on December 16,

1994, and January 6, 1995, the State

submitted supplementary information

which included refined modeling and

identification of the future reductions

needed to maintain the national ambient

air quality standard (NAAQS) for O3.

The Charlotte-Gastonia O3

nonattainment area includes

Mecklenburg and Gaston Counties.

Under the Clean Air Act, designations

can be changed if sufficient data are

available to warrant such changes. In

this action, EPA is proposing to approve

the State of North Carolina’s submittal

because it will meet the maintenance

plan and redesignation requirements.

The approved maintenance plan will

become a federally enforceable part of

North Carolina’s State Implementation

Plan (SIP) for the moderate

nonattainment area. In this action, EPA

is also proposing to approve the State of

North Carolina’s 1990 baseline

emissions inventory because it meets

EPA’s requirements regarding the

approval on baseline emission

inventories.

DATES: To be considered, comments

must be received by May 17, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Written comments on this

action should be addressed to Kay

Prince, at the EPA Regional Office listed

below.

Copies of the documents relative to

this action are available for public

inspection during normal business

hours at the following locations. The

interested persons wanting to examine

these documents should make an

appointment with the appropriate office

at least 24 hours before the visiting day.

Environmental Protection Agency,

Region 4 Air Programs Branch, 345

Courtland Street, NE, Atlanta, Georgia

30365.

State of North Carolina, Air Quality

Section, Division of Environmental

Management, North Carolina

Department of Environment, Health,

and Natural Resources, Raleigh, North

Carolina 27626.

Environmental Management Division,

Mecklenburg County Department of

Environmental Protection, 700 N.

Tryon Street, Charlotte, North

Carolina 28202–2236.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kay

Prince, Regulatory Planning and

Development Section, Air Programs

Branch, Air, Pesticides & Toxics

Management Division, Region 4

Environmental Protection Agency, 345

Courtland Street, NE, Atlanta, Georgia

30365. The telephone number is 404/

347–3555 extension 4221. Reference file

NC–061–1–6815.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On

November 15, 1990, the Clean Air Act

Amendments of 1990 were enacted.

(Pub. L. 101–549, 104 Stat. 2399,

codified at 42 U.S.C. 7401–7671q).

Under section 107(d)(1)(C), EPA

designated Mecklenburg County of the

Charlotte-Gastonia area as

nonattainment by operation of law with

respect to O3 because the area was

designated nonattainment immediately

before November 15, 1990. The

nonattainment area was expanded to

include Gaston County per section

107(d)(1)(A)(i) (See 56 FR 56694 (Nov.

6, 1991) and 57 FR 56762 (Nov. 30,

1992), codified at 40 CFR 81.318.) The

area was classified as moderate.

The moderate nonattainment area

more recently has ambient monitoring

data that show no violations of the O3

NAAQS, during the period from 1990

through 1993. Therefore, in an effort to

comply with the Clean Air Act as

amended in 1990 (CAA) and to ensure

continued attainment of the NAAQS, on

November 12, 1993, the State of North

Carolina submitted an O3 maintenance

plan and requested redesignation of the

area to attainment with respect to the O3

NAAQS. On January 24, 1994, Region 4

determined that the information

received from the State constituted a

complete redesignation request under

the general completeness criteria of 40

CFR 51, appendix V, sections 2.1 and

2.2. Subsequently, on December 16,

1994, and January 6, 1995, the State

submitted additional information that

refined the modeling and clarified the

future measures needed to ensure

maintenance of the O3 NAAQS.

The North Carolina redesignation

request for the Charlotte-Gastonia

moderate O3 nonattainment area meets

the five requirements of section

107(d)(3)(E) for redesignation to

attainment. The following is a brief

description of how the State of North

Carolina has fulfilled each of these

requirements. Because the maintenance

plan is a critical element of the

redesignation request, EPA will discuss

its evaluation of the maintenance plan

under its analysis of the redesignation

request.

1. The Area Must Have Attained the O3

NAAQS

The State of North Carolina’s request

is based on an analysis of quality

assured ambient air quality monitoring

data, which is relevant to the

maintenance plan and to the

redesignation request. Most recent

ambient air quality monitoring data for

calendar year 1990 through calendar

year 1993 show an expected exceedance

rate of less than 1.0 per year of the O3

NAAQS in the nonattainment area (See

40 CFR 50.9 and appendix H). The area

has continued to demonstrate

attainment to date. Because the

nonattainment area has complete

quality-assured data showing no

violations of the O3 NAAQS over the

most recent consecutive three calendar

year period, the area has met the first

component of attainment of the O3

NAAQS. The State of North Carolina

has also met the second component of

attainment of the O3 NAAQS by

committing to continue monitoring the

moderate nonattainment area in

accordance with 40 CFR part 58.

2. The Area Has Met All Applicable

Requirements Under Section 110 and

Part D of the CAA

On April 17, 1980, August 27, 1981,

October 11, 1985, November 19, 1986,

and December 19, 1986, EPA fully

approved North Carolina’s SIP as

meeting the requirements of section

110(a)(2) and part D of the 1977 CAA

(45 FR 26038, 46 FR 43137, 50 FR

41501, 51 FR 41786, and 51 FR 45468).

The approved control strategy did not

result in attainment of NAAQS for O3

prior to the 1990 CAA. Additionally, the

amended CAA revised section

182(a)(2)(A), 110(a)(2) and, under part