alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted by Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Each of the undersigned, Louis J. DAmbrosio, Chief Executive Officer and
President of Sears Holdings Corporation (the Company) and Robert A. Schriesheim, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, has executed this certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and
Exchange Commission of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended October 29, 2011 (the Report).

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|November 17, 2011                    
|                                     
|/s/ Louis J. DAmbrosio              
|Louis J. DAmbrosio                  
|Chief Executive Officer
and President
|                                     
|/s/ Robert A. Schriesheim            
|Robert A. Schriesheim                
|Executive Vice President and         
|Chief Financial Officer
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7140

Global Trade Works, LLC:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
SCWC-17-0000545

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

STATE OF HAWAI I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs. JIN WANG, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-17-0000545; CR. NO. 1PC1001890)
ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.) Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Jin Wang’s application for writ of certiorari filed on October 28, 2019, is hereby rejected. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, December 5, 2019.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-17-0000545 05-DEC-2019 08:17 AM
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 24

- 00078

- CV

Amanda Estrada v. Loan Ranger Capital Investments, LLC
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No 2 of Travis County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. C

- 1

- CV

- 23

- 004132

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEA LS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion

. No costs are assessed , as appellant filed an affidavit of inability to pay costs. We further order this decision certified below f or observance. March 21, 2024
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 26, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-6491

OK International, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Accentia Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) for the three months ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form
10-Q), I, Francis E. ODonnell, Jr., Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Dated: August 16, 2010



|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Francis E. ODonnell, Jr.                           
|Francis E. ODonnell, Jr., M.D.                         
|Chief Executive Officer; Chairman of the Board; Director

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of Accentia Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q),
irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
#### In the Matter of Carlos R., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Rhoda J. Cohen, J.), entered April 17, 1989, adjudicating appellant a juvenile delinquent upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts which if committed by an adult would constitute robbery in the first degree, robbery in the second degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, and placing him with the Division for Youth, Title III, for 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The evidence was legally sufficient to support the finding of the Family Court that appellant’s guilt was proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, after independently weighing the relative probative force of the testimony of the prosecution and defense witnesses, we conclude that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. *(People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495.)

Appellant argues that the complainant’s extensive criminal record gives rise to an implication that he put his own *193interests above those of society by testifying falsely. However, in this case the complainant had no interest in testifying falsely and incriminating appellant. His testimony that he recognized appellant from seeing him numerous times in the neighborhood firmly established appellant’s identity as his assailant. Any discrepancies between the description he gave to the police on the night of the robbery and that given at trial were minor, and the Judge of the Family Court, who had the opportunity to hear and observe the witnesses, was fully justified in crediting the complainant’s testimony over that of appellant’s alibi witness. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ross, Kassal, Ellerin and Wallach, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lucas Energy, Inc.  (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the three month period ended  September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Malek, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)               The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)               The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WILFREDO SANTOS CAMACHO, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 19-70573 

Agency No. A088-722-031 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 21, 2021**

Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges. 

Wilfredo Santos Camacho, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for 

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an 

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for deferral of removal under 

the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUN 24 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 19-70573 

§ 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, applying 

the standards governing adverse credibility determinations under the REAL ID 

Act. Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1039-40 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the 

petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination 

based on inconsistencies in Santos Camacho’s testimony as to the circumstances of

his cousin’s murder and which family members reside in Mexico, and

inconsistencies between his testimony and documentary evidence as to his entries 

to and departures from the United States. See Shrestha, 590 F.3d at 1048 (adverse 

credibility determination reasonable under “the totality of the circumstances”). 

Santos Camacho’s explanations do not compel a contrary conclusion. See Lata v. 

INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1245 (9th Cir. 2000). 

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of Santos Camacho’s 

CAT claim because it was based on the same testimony the agency found not 

credible, and Santos Camacho does not point to any other evidence in the record 

that compels the conclusion that it is more likely than not he would be tortured by 

or with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to Mexico. See 

Shrestha, 590 F.3d at 1048-49.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Christopher R. BOWERS, Appellant.

No. WD 52337.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Nov. 26, 1996.

Jeannie Arterburn, Assistant Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Breek K. Burgess, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before SMART, P.J., and SPINDEN and ELLIS, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Christopher R. Bowers appeals from his conviction by jury of murder in the second degree, § 565.021,1 and armed criminal action, § 571.015, in the Circuit Court of Jackson County. Bowers was sentenced to concurrent terms of seventeen and four years, respectively, in the Missouri Department of Corrections.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

1

. All statutory references are to RSMo 1994 unless otherwise noted.
#### Marvin Lee IRVIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 46581.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

June 1, 1993.

Brad B. Baker, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before FENNER, P.J., and SPINDEN and SMART, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from the dismissal of a Rule 24.-035 motion for post-conviction relief.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Compensatory Arrangements with Directors



 Exhibit 10.4 

Compensatory Arrangements with Directors 

The amount of the annual cash retainer, committee chair cash retainers and restricted stock grants for our non-employee directors for the current year
are set forth in the table below. Each non-employee director is also paid $2,000 for each meeting of the Board of Directors or any committee thereof of which he is a member that he attends. Directors who are employees of PTC are not compensated for
their service as a director. 
  

											
	 Name
	  	 Chair Position
	  	Annual Retainer	  	Committee
Chair 
Retainer	  	Annual Equity
Grant(1)
					
	 Donald Grierson
	  	 Lead Independent Director
  

Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee
	  	$	75,000	  	 	—  	  	12,912 shares
					
	 Robert Schechter
	  	Audit Committee	  	$	35,000	  	$	10,000	  	11,813 shares
					
	 Robert Goldman
	  	Compensation Committee	  	$	35,000	  	$	10,000	  	11,813 shares
					
	 Michael Porter
	  	Corporate Development Committee	  	$	35,000	  	$	5,000	  	10,714 shares
					
	 Paul Lacy
	  		  	$	35,000	  			  	10,714 shares

  

	(1)	The restrictions on the shares will lapse on the earlier of the date of the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholder and March 15, 2011, provided the person remains a
director on that date and pursuant to our 2000 Equity Incentive Plan.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7278

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JACQUELYN M. KUBINSKI,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Fayetteville. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CR-93-28-5, CA-97-944-5-H)

Submitted: January 5, 1999 Decided: February 10, 1999

Before WILKINS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jacquelyn M. Kubinski, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver,

Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

her motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Kubinski, No. CR-93-28-5; CA-97-944-

5-H (E.D.N.C. Aug. 6, 1998). Appellant’s motion for the appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 30, 2013

d0722

Order 

Clerk

July 30, 2013

146140(16)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146140

COA: 311749

Isabella CC: 2011-001635-FH; 

2011-001642-FH; 

2011-002495-FH;

2011-001835-FH

FRANCIS EDWARD PARKS,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s March 8, 

2013 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5476 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1077 River Road, Suite 1, in Washington 

Crossing, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Susan C. Barnhart Post 

Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5476 EH

1 SECTION 1. SUSAN C. BARNHART POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 1077 River Road, Suite 1, in 

4 Washington Crossing, Pennsylvania, shall be known and 

5 designated as the ‘‘Susan C. Barnhart Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Susan C. Barnhart 

10 Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 3, 2024. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5476 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Post-

‘‘Susan C. Barnhart Post Office’’. in Washington Crossing, Pennsylvania, as the al Service located at 1077 River Road, Suite 1,
**Exhibit32.2**

**StationCasinos, Inc.**

**CertificationPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(18U.S.C. Section 1350)**

Pursuantto the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.Sections 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certify as follows:

1.                                       ThomasM. Friel is the Principal Accounting Officer of the Company (the “Company”).

2.                                       Theundersigned certifies to the best of his knowledge:

(A)                              TheCompany’s Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2006 accompanying thisCertification, in the form filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”); and

(B)                                Theinformation in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Dated: May 4, 2007 |
|--------------------|
|               |
|               |
|               | /s/ Thomas M. Friel |   |
|               | Thomas M. Friel |
|               | Executive Vice President, |
|               | Chief Accounting Officer and |
|               | Treasurer |
|               | (Principal Accounting Officer) |

 

----
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jerry SCHNEIDER, Appellant. Jerry SCHNEIDER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. WD 44436, WD 47091.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Oct. 5, 1993.

*358Cinda J. Eichler, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before TURNAGE, C.J., and SMART and ELLIS, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from his conviction of second degree arson. Section 569.050, RSMo 1986. The direct appeal has been consolidated with his appeal from the dismissal of a Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief as untimely filed.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

The dismissal of post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 81 (Thursday, April 25, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18405-18406]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10155]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[ID-990-1020-01]


Upper Snake River Districts Resource Advisory Council Meeting

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Resource Advisory Council Meeting Location and Time.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), 5 U.S.C., the 
Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) council 
meeting of the Upper Snake River Districts Resource Advisory Council 
will be held as indicated below. The agenda includes a field 
examination of a fire rehabilitation and a kapuka, and a BLM manager's 
briefing on resources and programs. All meetings are open to the 
public. The public may present written comments to the council. Each 
formal council meeting will have a time allocated for hearing public 
comments. The public comment period for the council meeting is listed 
below. Depending on the number of persons wishing to comment, and time 
available,

[[Page 18406]]

the time for individual oral comments may be limited. Individuals who 
plan to attend and need further information about the meetings, or need 
special assistance such as sign language interpretation or other 
reasonable accommodations, should contact Debra Kovar at the Shoshone 
Resource Area Office, P.O. Box 2-B, Shoshone, ID, 83352, (208) 886-
7201.

DATE AND TIME: Date is May 30, 1996, starts at 8:30 a.m. at the Natural 
Resource Service office in Arco, Idaho. Public comments from 8:30 a.m.-
9:00 a.m.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the Council is to advise the 
Secretary of the Interior, through the BLM, on a variety of planning 
and management issues associated with the management of the public 
lands.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Contact Debra Kovar, Shoshone Resource Area 
Office, P.O. Box 2-B, Shoshone, ID 83352, (208) 886-7201.

    Dated: April 11, 1996.
Joe Kraayenbrink,
Acting District Manager.
[FR Doc. 96-10155 Filed 4-24-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GG-P