alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 510 

To require the United States Governor of, and the United States Executive 

Director at, the International Monetary Fund to oppose an increase 

in the weight of the Chinese renminbi in the Special Drawing Rights 

basket of the Fund, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 25, 2023 

Mr. DAVIDSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To require the United States Governor of, and the United 

States Executive Director at, the International Monetary 

Fund to oppose an increase in the weight of the Chinese 

renminbi in the Special Drawing Rights basket of the 

Fund, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Chinese Currency Ac5 countability Act of 2023’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 510 IH

1 SEC. 2. OPPOSITION OF THE UNITED STATES TO AN IN2 CREASE IN THE WEIGHT OF THE CHINESE 

3 RENMINBI IN THE SPECIAL DRAWING RIGHTS 

4 BASKET OF THE INTERNATIONAL MONETARY 

5 FUND. 

6 The Secretary of the Treasury shall instruct the 

7 United States Governor of, and the United States Execu8 tive Director at, the International Monetary Fund to use 

9 the voice and vote of the United States to oppose any in10 crease in the weight of the Chinese renminbi in the basket 

11 of currencies used to determine the value of Special Draw12 ing Rights, unless the Secretary of the Treasury has sub13 mitted to the Committee on Financial Services of the 

14 House of Representatives and the Committee on Banking, 

15 Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate a written report 

16 which includes a certification that— 

17 (1) the People’s Republic of China is in compli18 ance with all its obligations under Article VIII of the 

19 Articles of Agreement of the Fund; 

20 (2) in the preceding 12 months, there has not 

21 been a report submitted under section 3005 of the 

22 Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988 or 

23 section 701 of the Trade Facilitation and Trade En24 forcement Act of 2015 in which the People’s Repub25 lic of China has been found to have manipulated its 

26 currency; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 510 IH

1 (3) the People’s Republic of China has insti2 tuted and is implementing the policies and practices 

3 necessary to ensure that the renminbi is freely usa4 ble (within the meaning of Article XXX(f) of the Ar5 ticles of Agreement of the Fund); and 

6 (4) the People’s Republic of China adheres to 

7 the rules and principles of the Paris Club and the 

8 OECD Arrangement on Officially Supported Export 

9 Credits. 

10 SEC. 3. SUNSET. 

11 Section 2 shall have no force or effect beginning 10 

12 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### Isaac JOHNSON, Jr., Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

No. 65368.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Nov. 8, 1994.

Gary E. Brotherton, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Christine M. Kocot, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial, after an eviden-tiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 9 (Friday, January 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 3257]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-909]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[CA-050-05-1220-00]

Availability of an Environmental Assessment Amending the Arcata 
Resource Management Plan for the Samoa Peninsula Management Area

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice advises the public that the Bureau of Land 
Management has available the draft environmental assessment which 
amends the existing Arcata Resource Area Management Plan addressing the 
Samoa Peninsula Management Area. This area includes both the Samoa 
Dunes parcel, (T.5N.,R.1W., Sec. 31, S\1/2\ & T.4N.,R.1w. Sec.6) and 
the Manila Dunes parcel, (T.6N.,R.1W.,parts of Sec. 26,27,34, and 35). 
This notice is being furnished to inform the public of the documents 
availability and to begin the 30 day public comment period.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lynda J. Roush, Area Manager, at Bureau of Land Management, Arcata 
Resource Area, 1125 16th Street, Room 219, Arcata, CA 95521. Telephone: 
(707) 822-7648.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The environmental assessment was prepared in 
accordance with the requirements set forth in the Code of Federal 
Regulations (43 CFR 1610.5-5). Issues and concerns addressed in the 
environmental assessment focus on key land use management changes.
    The changes are to:

Close the Manila Dunes parcel to off-Highway-Vehicle use.
Close the Samoa Dunes parcel nightly, to reduce crime and vandalism;
Prohibit crossbow/bow shooting from both parcels;
Conduct native dune plant habitat restoration and research.

    The environmental assessment is available for public review. 
Availability has also been published in county and state newspapers. 
There will be a 30 day comment period beginning the date in which this 
notice appears in the Federal Register. Public comments should be 
mailed in writing to the above address.
Lynda J. Roush,
Area Manager.
[FR Doc. 95-909 Filed 1-12-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-M
```
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the quarterly report of Brooklyn Federal Bancorp, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Richard A. Kielty, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.











Date:  February
17, 2009





/s/ Richard A. KieltyRichard
      A. KieltyPresident
      and Chief Executive
Officer
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF OFFICERS


OF
BIO-BRIDGE SCIENCE, INC.


PURSUANT
TO 18 USC ss. 1350





I, Liang
Qiao, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(a) The
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 of Bio-Bridge
Science, Inc. (the "Company"), fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(b)
Information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Date:
      May 15, 2009
                      
                      /s/ 
      Dr. Liang
      QiaoBy:
      Dr. Liang Qiao
                        Chief
      Executive
Officer




I, Chuen
Huei (Kevin) Lee, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(c) The
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 of Bio-Bridge
Science, Inc. (the "Company") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(d)
Information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Date:
      May 15, 2009
                    
                    /s/ 
      Chuen Huei (Kevin)
      LeeBy:
      Chuen Huei (Kevin) Lee
                      Chief
      Financial Officer and
                      Principal
      Accounting
Officer
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7022

MAHLE Behr USA, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
#### Joseph WALLACE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 65189.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Aug. 2, 1994.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Sept. 19, 1994.

Application to Transfer Denied Oct. 25, 1994.

David C. Hemingway, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Millie Culbur, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER .*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Joseph Wallace, appeals the order of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County denying appellant’s Rule 24.035 post-conviction motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs and arguments of the parties, as well as the transcripts and the legal file, and find no clear error in the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the trial court. In addition, we find that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We, therefore, affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rules 84.16(b) and 30.25(b). The parties have been provided with a memorandum, solely for their own information, setting forth the reasons for our decision.
**EXHIBIT 32.01**

 

**Section 1350Certification**

 

In connection with this quarterly report of ML Aspect FuturesAccess LLC(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I,Justin C. Ferri, Chief Executive Officer, President and Manager of MerrillLynch Alternative Investments LLC, the manager of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Date:  November 12, 2010

 
| By:    | /s/  JUSTIN C. FERRI                   |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Justin  C. Ferri                       |   |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer and President |   |
|   | (Principal  Executive Officer)         |   |

 

----
EXHIBIT 31.2





CERTIFICATIONS





I, Robert A. Schriesheim, certify that:


1.I have reviewed this amendment to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sears Holdings Corporation; and2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.








Date: May 26, 2016





/s/ Robert A. Schriesheim


Robert A. Schriesheim  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Sears Holdings Corporation
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

April 12, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7158

ECM Industries LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_04.15.19.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2


                      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Robert W. Hughes certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of OC Financial, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of circumstances under which such statements were
     made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material respect
     the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
     registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
     the registrant and have:

     a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting; and

5.   I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
     over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
     committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
     equivalent functions):

     a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting.


Date:  August 15, 2005


/s/ Robert W. Hughes
--------------------
Robert W. Hughes
Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


                                       23
1 The Honorable Michael J. Davis, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 02-1358

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Jose Guadalupe Arevalo, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: August 28, 2002 Filed: August 30, 2002

___________ Before LOKEN, BYE, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Jose Guadalupe Arevalo pled guilty to conspiring to distribute in excess of 5 kilograms of cocaine and in excess of 50 grams of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(b)(1)(A), and to two counts of aiding and abetting the distribution of a mixture or substance containing cocaine (4 kilograms as to one count and 3 kilograms as to the other), in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(B) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. At sentencing, the district court 1 rejected Arevalo’s argument that sections 841(b)(1)(A) and (B) were facially unconstitutional under Apprendi v. New2Arevalo also argues that our reasoning in United States v. Aguayo-Delgado , 220 F.3d 926, 934 (8th Cir.), cert. denied , 531 U.S. 1026 (2000), is faulty, but only this court en banc may revisit the case. See United States v. Wright , 22 F.3d 787, 788 (8th Cir. 1994). -2- Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and sentenced Arevalo to 10 years imprisonment and 5 years supervised release. Arevalo appeals, renewing his constitutional argument. We affirm. Arevalo’s argument is foreclosed by our recent decisions upholding the facial constitutionality of § 841(b)(1)(A) and (B) after Apprendi , see United States v. Sprofera , No. 01-3674, 2002 WL 1726817, at *3 (8th Cir. July 26, 2002); United States v. Carter , 294 F.3d 978, 980-81 (8th Cir. 2002) (per curiam), and further, the Supreme Court has now held that judges do not violate Apprendi in resolving factors that increase the statutory minimum sentence. See Harris v. United States , 122 S. Ct. 2406, 2414 (2002). 2 Accordingly, we affirm. A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
---

---

Exhibit
10.2

# INDEPENDENT
AUDITORS CONSENT

To the Shareholders of Gilat Satellite
Networks Ltd.

As independent public accountants for
StarBand Communications Inc., we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference to these
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-113932, 333-96630, 333-08826,
333-10092, 333-12466, 333-12988 and 333-123410) and Form F-3 (Registration Nos. 333-113950 and
333-12698) of our report dated January 19, 2005, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. included in this Amended Annual Report on
Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004.

/s/ MAYER HOFFMAN MCCANN P.C.Bethesda, Maryland

November 28,, 2005



---

---
EXHIBIT 32



<PAGE>






     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Learningwire.com (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  Stephen K. Smith,  the President and
Chief Executive Officer and Michael Grove the Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of
their knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects the financial condition and results of the Company.


                                          KRANEM CORPORATION
                                          d/b/a
                                          LEARNINGWIRE.COM



August 8, 2007                           By:   /s/ Stephen K. Smith
                                               -------------------------------
                                               Stephen K. Smith, President and
                                               Chief Executive Officer


August 8, 2007                           By:   /s/ Michael Grove
                                               -------------------------------
                                               Michael Grove, Principal
                                               Financial and Accounting
                                               Officer
#### Judy A. Velletri, Respondent, v Andrew J. Velletri, Appellant.

Appeal (transferred to this court by order of the Appellate Division, Second Department) from an order of the Supreme Court (Beisner, J.), entered October 16, 1989 in Dutchess County, which denied defendant’s motion to enjoin the sale of the parties’ real property and to require plaintiff to place the proceeds of the sale in escrow.

Order affirmed, without costs, upon the opinion of Justice Ralph A. Beisner. Kane, J. P., Weiss, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Harvey, JJ., concur.
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Ronald BLACKMON, Appellant. Ronald BLACKMON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri.

Nos. WD 49158, WD 50424.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

June 27, 1995.

Rosalynn Koch, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before HANNA, P.J., and BERREY and SPINDEN, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Ronald Blackmon appeals his sodomy conviction and 500-year sentence and the dismissal of his untimely motion for post-conviction relief. He contends that the state did not present sufficient evidence to support a verdict of guilty, that his sentence is unconstitutional, and that the time deadline contained in Rule 29.15(b) arbitrarily denied him due process. We affirm his convictions and the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion. Because we do not discern any jurisprudential value to publishing an opinion, we issue this summary order. Rule 84.16(b).