alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<Page>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 31.02

                     RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS

I, Michael L. Pungello, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of ML Winton FuturesAccess LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
     prepared;

     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
     over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
     fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
     materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
     reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, of internal control over financial reporting to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
     operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
     likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
     summarize and report financial information; and

     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
     over financial reporting.

Date: November 14, 2005
-----------------------

By /s/ MICHAEL L. PUNGELLO
   -----------------------
Michael L. Pungello
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### Carlos Henry ALLEN, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 40486.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Nov. 1, 1988.

Melinda K. Pendergraph, Columbia, for movant-appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Elizabeth L. Ziegler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before FENNER, P.J., and MANFORD and GAITAN, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Direct appeal from the denial of post-conviction relief sought pursuant to Rule 27.-26.

Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 51228 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee

v. ARTURO MALDONADO-NUNEZ,
Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:16 -CR- 189 -1

Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Arturo Maldonado

Nunez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Maldonado-Nunez ha s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 13, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-51228 Document: 00514031870 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/13/2017No. 16

- 51228

2 nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 16-51228 Document: 00514031870 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/13/2017
Organization Name:

Note: Representatives submitting on behalf of an organization must enter information below.

Requestor Representative:

Section 301 Investigation: China's Acts, Policies, and Practices Related to Technology 

Transfer, Intellectual Property, and Innovation - Form to Request Exclusion of Product

When submitting a product exclusion request using this form, enter the specified 

information in the following fields and explain the basis and rationale for your statements. 

By completing this form, you certify that the information provided is complete and 

correct to the best of your knowledge. 

1. Indicate whether the comment contains business confidential information (BCI), is a public

document, or is a public version of a BCI document.

3.

2. Please provide a complete and detailed description of the product of concern:

4.

5. Requestor's relationship to the product:

CONTINUED BELOW

*

10-digit HTSUS item number* for product you wish to address in this product exclusion request:

Use numerical characters only with no special characters (example: 1023456789). For help in finding 

the HTSUS item number associated with your product, see https://hts.usitc.gov/

1

7.

6. Does this submission in regulations.gov include additional attachments?

Please indicate whether any additional attachment contains business confidential

information (BCI), is a public document, or is a public version of a BCI document.

VERSION 1

Requestor Information

Requestor Name (Last, First):

Public Version of BCI

RC1012, 11.2 ton Capacity, 12.00 in Stroke, General Purpose Hydraulic Cylinder; Maximum Operating 

Pressure psi: 10000; Weight Kgs: 6,8; Oil Capacity Advance cm3: 441; Stroke Ranges mm: 290 - 

379

8412210075 Schmidt, Jackie Enerpac Jackie SchmidtImporter Yes Contains BCI
END 2

8. Is this product, or a comparable product, available from sources in the United States?:

VERSION 1

11. Please provide information in support your request, taking account of the instructions

provided in Section B of the Federal Register notice (note: text entered below can extend

beyond the apparent size of this box).

9. Is this product, or a comparable product, available from sources in third countries?:

10. Please provide the value and quantity (with units) of the Chinese-origin product of concern

that you purchased for each calendar year specified. Limit this figure to the products

purchased by your firm (or by members of your trade association) alone. Please provide 

estimates if precise figures are unavailable.

2016 Value:

2015 Value:

2017 Value:

2016 Quantity:

2015 Quantity:

2017 Quantity:

No No BCI BCI BCI BCI BCI BCI

See addendum for additional information.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

April 12, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6544

OK International, Inc: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_04.15.19.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7786

ECM Industries LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_5-30-2019.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
#### James W. Grau, Respondent, v Eljay Real Estate Corp., N.V., Formerly Eljay Corp., et al., Defendants, and Cedar Park Concrete Corp. et al., Appellants. (And Other Actions.)

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (C. Beau-champ Ciparick, J.), entered July 18, 1989, which, *inter alia,*denied motions by defendants-appellants Cedar Park Concrete Corp. and Sal-Vio Construction Corp. for an order striking the complaint of plaintiff-respondent James W. Grau to the extent that he seeks punitive damages against them, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Punitive damages are available in the case of an intentional tort of an extreme nature to " 'deter morally culpable conduct’ ” *(Minjak Co. v Randolph,*140 AD2d 245, 249). The motion to strike punitive damages was properly denied as to defendant Sal-Vio, which allegedly allowed its workmen to enter onto plaintiff’s premises and make personal use of it beyond any reasonable extent, and then to retaliate for the plaintiff calling the police by vandalizing the plaintiff’s apartment and threatening him with bodily harm. The motion was also properly denied as to defendant Cedar Park, which is alleged to have repeatedly allowed concrete to fall on plaintiff’s terrace and greenhouse.

On appeal, for the first time, both Cedar Park and Sal-Vio claim that they are entitled to complete summary judgment, dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint entirely. No such motion was made in the IAS court, and we decline to reach the argument on appeal. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Carro, Milonas and Ellerin, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Railroad Retirement Board

Notice is hereby given in accordance with Public Law 92-463 that the Actuarial Advisory Committee will hold a virtual meeting on June 7, 2021, at 9:00 a.m. (Central Daylight Time) on the conduct of the 28th Actuarial Valuation of the Railroad Retirement System. The agenda for this meeting will include a discussion of the results and presentation of the 28th Actuarial Valuation. The text and tables that constitute the Valuation will have been prepared in draft form for review by the Committee. It is expected that this will be the last meeting of the Committee before publication of the Valuation.

                    The meeting will be open to the public. Persons wishing to submit written statements, make oral presentations, or attend the meeting should address their communications or notices to Patricia Pruitt (                    *Patricia.Pruitt@rrb.gov*) so that information on how to join the virtual meeting can be provided.                

Dated: May 27, 2021.

Stephanie Hillyard,

Secretary to the Board.

[FR Doc. 2021-11567 Filed 6-1-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5308 

To reauthorize the Distance Learning and Telemedicine Program of the 

Department of Agriculture. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 29, 2023 

Mr. LANGWORTHY (for himself, Ms. PINGREE, Mr. BISHOP of Georgia, Mr. 

DUARTE, Mr. GOLDEN of Maine, Mr. DAVIS of North Carolina, Ms. SALINAS, Mr. PAPPAS, Ms. BUDZINSKI, Ms. TENNEY, Ms. CROCKETT, and 

Ms. ADAMS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Distance Learning and Telemedicine 

Program of the Department of Agriculture. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rural Telehealth and 

5 Education Enhancement Act of 2023’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5308 IH

1 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE DISTANCE LEARNING 

2 AND TELEMEDICINE PROGRAM. 

3 Section 2335A of the Food, Agriculture, Conserva4 tion, and Trade Act of 1990 (7 U.S.C. 950aaa–5) is 

5 amended by striking ‘‘2023’’ and inserting ‘‘2028’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 69 (Tuesday, April 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 18399]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8789]




-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. TM95-3-48-000]


ANR Pipeline Co.; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

April 5, 1995.

    Take notice that on March 31, 1995, ANR Pipeline Company (ANR), 
tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, the tariff sheets 
which ANR proposes to be effective May 1, 1995:

Second Revised Volume No. 1

Seventh Revised Sheet No. 17

Original Volume No. 2

1st Revised Sheet Nos. 13 and 14

    ANR states that the referenced tariff sheets are being submitted to 
update the ``Eligible Throughput Actually Experienced'' as required in 
Sections 26.4 and 27.3 of ANR's FERC Gas Tariff Second Revised Volume 
No. 1 to adjust the Volumetric Buyout Buydown Surcharge and Upstream 
Pipeline Surcharge, commencing May 1, 1995.
    ANR states that each of its Volume Nos. 1 and 2 customers and 
interested State Commissions has been apprised of this filing via U.S. 
Mail.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Commission, 825 North 
Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426 in accordance with Rules 
211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedures (18 
CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions or protests should be filed 
on or before April 12, 1995. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person 
wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of 
this application are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-8789 Filed 4-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0544

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JUSTIN JAMES SWANSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to 

file Appellant’s reply brief and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is given an extension of 

time until March 29, 2024, to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s 

reply brief.

No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 22 2024

02/22/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0544
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF OFFICERS**


**OF
      BIO-BRIDGE SCIENCE, INC.**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 USC ss. 1350**





I,
      Liang
      Qiao, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(a)
      The
      quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 of
      Bio-Bridge Science, Inc. (the "Company"), fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and





(b)
      Information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.






*Date:
                November 14, 2008*
            
            /s/*Dr.
                Liang Qiao**By:*
            *Dr.
                Liang Qiao*
              *Chief
                Executive Officer*






I,
      Chuen
      Huei (Kevin) Lee, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(c)
      The
      quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 of
      Bio-Bridge Science, Inc. (the "Company") fully complies with the requirements
      of
      Section 13(a) or 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(d)
      Information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.






*Date:
                November 14, 2008*
            
            /s/*Chuen
                Huei (Kevin) Lee**By:*
            *Chuen
                Huei (Kevin) Lee*
              *Chief
                Financial Officer and*
              *Principal
                Accounting Officer*
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report ofBulldog Financial, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended November 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Scott McDowell, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated this 17th day of January, 2006.



| | /s/ Scott McDowell                                 
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Scott McDowell                                     
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer











---
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Elite
Cosmetics, Inc. for the quarter ending April 30, 2005, I, Glen Landry, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Elite Cosmetics, Inc. hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:


     1.   Such Quarterly Report on amended Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending
          April 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


     2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
          the quarter ending April 30, 2005, fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Elite
          Cosmetics, Inc.


Dated:  October 18, 2005

ELITE COSMETICS, INC.

By: /s/ Glen Landry
-------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6782

Omron Management Center of America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel