alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 5 D0 26 1

. RUTH F AL L S

- M I LLER v. SAVANNAH-CHATHAM COUNTY

BOARD OF EDUCATI ON.

In t h i s ad m i n is t rat i ve ap peal

, Ru t h Fal l s -M i l l er s eek s d i s cret i o n ary rev i ew o f

t h e s u p eri o r co u rt ’ s o rd er affi rm i n g t h e ag en cy ’ s d eci s i o n

. Th e s u p eri o r co urt ’ s o rd er

was en t ered o n Au g u st 1 5, 2 0 14

, an d Fal l s -M i ll er fi led her ap p l i cat i o n o n Feb ru ary 7,

2 0 1 5

. 1 W e l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n b ecau s e t he ap p l i cat i o n i s u n t i m el y

. An ap p l icat i o n fo r di s cret i o n ary ap p eal m u s t b e fi l ed wi t h i n 3 0 day s o f t h e

en t ry o f t h e o rd er o r ju d g m e n t t o b e ap p eal ed

. See OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (d ). Th e

req u i rem en t s o f OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 are ju ri s d i ct i o nal , an d t h i s Co urt can no t accep t an

ap p li cat io n fo r ap p eal no t m ad e i n co m p li an ce t h erewi t h

. See Bo yl e v. S t a t e , 1 9 0 Ga.

Ap p

. 73 4 ( 3 8 0 S E 2 d 5 7 ) (1 9 8 9 ). Here, Fal l s -M i l l er fi l ed her ap p li cat i o n 1 7 6 day s

aft e r e n t r y o f t he o rd er sh e s eek s t o ap p eal

. T herefo re, her ap p l i cat io n i s un t i m el y ,

an d i t i s h ereb y

DISM ISSED fo r l ack o f ju ri s d ict i on

.

1 Fal l s -M i l l er p rev i o u s l y fi l ed a d i rect ap p eal fro m t h e su p eri o r co urt ’ s o rd er, wh i ch we d i s m i s s ed b ecau s e sh e fai l ed t o fo l l o w t h e d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal s p ro ced u re. See Cas e No . A1 5 A0 9 0 1 (d i s m i s s ed o n J an u ary 2 1 , 2 0 1 5). March 03, 2015C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e
, A t la n t a
,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 03/03/2015
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 9 (Friday, January 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 3270]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-910]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Office of the Secretary


Glass Ceiling Commission; Postponement of Commission Meetings

summary: Due to the scheduling difficulties of participants, the Glass 
Ceiling Commission meetings have been postponed. The meetings had been 
announced previously in the Federal Register of January 9, 1995, 60 FR 
2403. The Commission meetings were to take place on Monday, January 23, 
1995, 4:00 pm-7:00 pm and Tuesday, January 24, 1995, 9:00 am to 12 noon 
at the Department of Labor. The Commission meeting will be rescheduled 
at a later date.

for further information contact: Ms. Rene A. Redwood, Executive 
Director, Glass Ceiling Commission, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 
Constitution Avenue NW., Room C-2313, Washington, DC 20210, (202) 219-
7342.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 9th day of January, 1995.
Rene A. Redwood,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 95-910 Filed 1-12-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-23-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

April 12, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6538

OK International, Inc: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_04.15.19.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**STATEMENTOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 (the “Form 10-Q”) ofCardinal Financial Corporation, I, Bernard H. Clineburg, Chairman, Presidentand Chief Executive Officer, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to my knowledge:

 

(a)                                  the Form 10-Q fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended; and

 

(b)                                 the information contained in the Form10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financialcondition and results of operations of the Company and its subsidiaries as of,and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.

 

 
| Date: November 22, 2004 | /s/ Bernard H. Clineburg                         |   |
|------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                         | Bernard H. Clineburg                             |
|                         | Chairman, President and Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

December 9, 2 019

No. 04

- 19

- 00728

- CV

Gary DANIELS

, Appellant

v.

Alissa DANIELS, Appellee

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2015

- CI

- 20628 Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

On December 4, 2019, the trial court clerk notified this court that the clerk’s record was not filed when it was originally due because appellant had failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the record and that appellant was not entitled to appeal without paying the fee. It is therefore ORDERED that appellant provide written proof to this court within ten days of the date of this order that either (1) the clerk’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the clerk’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitle d to appeal without paying the clerk’s fee. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, this appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(b).

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 9th day of December, 2019

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT
        32.2
  CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
 TO
        SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Juma Technology, Corp. (the "Company")
        on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
        Anthony
        Fernandez, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
        to 18
        U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  November
                  13, 2007
              
              /s/ Anthony
                FernandezAnthony
                  Fernandez
                Chief
                  Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Universal Capital Management, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended July 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael D. Queen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Michael D. Queen

Michael D. Queen,

Chief Executive Officer

September 11, 2009
#### Kenneth R. KUELLMER, Jr., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Robert A. MACH, Defendant/Respondent.

No. 64330.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

Feb. 21, 1995.

*399John C. Weller, Kell, Custer, Weller & Miller, Terrence F. Moffitt, St. Louis, for appellant.

George F. Kosta, Kosta & Associates, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before SMITH, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and WHITE, JJ.

*MEMORANDUM DECISION*

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment based upon a jury verdict finding no negligence by defendant in a water-skiing accident in which plaintiff was injured. The only issue on appeal is the court’s refusal to admit into evidence a videotape made demonstrating aspects of water-skiing and recreating the accident in issue. The admission of the evidence was within the discretion of the trial court and we find no abuse of that discretion. *Bailey v. Valtec Hydraulics, Inc.,*748 S.W.2d 805 (Mo.App.1988) [1]; *McPherson Redevelopment Corporation v. Watkins,*782 S.W.2d 690 (Mo.App.1989) [4]. We also find no prejudice to plaintiff as the videotape was cumulative to other evidence admitted. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Money Tree Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 25, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, W. Derek Martin, President of the Company, and Steven P. Morrison, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 9, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ W. Derek Martin   
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  | W. Derek Martin        
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  | President              
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: August 9, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Steven P. Morrison
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  | Steven P. Morrison     
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  | Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 31.01**

**Rule13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications**

I, Benjamin Weston,certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q ofML Aspect FuturesAccess LLC;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant’s other certifying officer andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)  Disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: November 14, 2006                |                 |
|----------------------------------------|----------------------|
|                                   |
| By                                     | /s/ BENJAMIN  WESTON |   |
| Benjamin Weston                        |
| Chief Executive  Officer and President |
| (Principal  Executive Officer)         |
|                                        |                      |  |  |

 

1

----
#### MOKAN ST. LOUIS CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTORS ASSISTANCE CENTER, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. ST. LOUIS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Defendant/Appellant.

No. 68272.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

April 30, 1996.

Lynn M. Bohlmann, Mayor’s Office, St. Louis, for appellant.

Eric Keith Vickers, Vickers & Associates, University City, for respondent.

Before GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J., and RHODES RUSSELL and DOWD, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

DefendanVappellant, St. Louis Development Corporation, appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis awarding plaintifRrespondent, MoKan St. Louis Construction Contractors Assistance Center, damages for breach of contract. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find no error. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the circuit court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.
**EXHIBIT32.02**

**Section 1350 Certification**

In connection with thisquarterly report of ML Winton FuturesAccess LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I, Barbra E. Kocsis, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. This Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in this Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

Date: August 14, 2007
| By                                           | /s/ BARBRA E. KOCSIS |   |
|----------------------------------------------|----------------------|--------|
| Barbra E. Kocsis                             |
| Chief Financial Officer                      |
| (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |

 

----
exv10w8






Exhibit 10.8




TRADEMARK COLLATERAL AGREEMENT AND NOTICE




     This Trademark Collateral Agreement and Notice dated as of April 14, 2010, is between
Cardiovascular Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation with its principal place of
business at 651 Campus Drive, St. Paul, MN 55112 (“Assignor”) and Partners for Growth III,
L.P., 180 Pacific Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94111 (“Assignee”) pursuant to a Loan and
Security Agreement dated April 14, 2010, by and between Assignor and Assignee and pursuant to
certain other loan documents referenced therein (collectively, the “Loan Documents”).



     WHEREAS, Assignor is the owner of certain trademarks, including all federal applications
and/or registrations therefor, together with the goodwill of the business connected with the use
of and symbolized thereby, as listed on Exhibit 1 hereto (the “Marks”); and



     WHEREAS, Assignee has agreed to extend certain credit to Assignor on condition that the
Assignor pledge and grant to Assignee as collateral for the Obligations (as defined in the Loan
Documents) a security interest and lien in and to the Marks and all proceeds thereof and all other
related claims and rights as more fully described in a certain Intellectual Property Security
Agreement (the “Security Agreement”) in favor of the Assignee dated April 14, 2010, by and between
Assignor and Assignee;



     NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, as security for the due and timely payment
and performance of the Obligations, Assignor hereby pledges and grants to Assignee a security
interest and lien in and to the Marks and all proceeds thereof and gives notice of such security
interest and the existence of such Security Agreement providing therefor.



     Executed as of the date first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 

	Assignor:	 	 	 	Assignee:	 	 
	 
	Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.	 	 	 	PARTNERS FOR GROWTH III, L.P.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By	 	/s/ David L. Martin	 	 	 	By	 	/s/ Lorraine Nield	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Chief Executive Officer
	 	 	 	 	 	Name:
	 	Lorraine Nield	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Title:
	 	Manager, Partners for Growth III, LLC	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Its General Partner	 	 
	By

	 	/s/ James E. Flaherty	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Secretary
Exhibit
32.2
 
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of JayHawk Energy, Inc. a Colorado
corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Thomas G. Ryman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to
the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
JayHawk Energy, Inc., and will be retained by JayHawk Energy, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
  /s/
      Thomas G. RymanThomas
      G. Ryman
                Chief
      Financial Officer
                May
      8, 2009
### I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

No. 12-10714 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. AMBER SCHMIDT, Defendant-Appellant

A ppeal from the United States District Court f or the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:11-CR-304-1
Before JONES, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Amber Schmidt has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and U n ited States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2 011). S chmidt has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevan t p ortions of the record reflected therein. We concur with

c o u n s e l ’ s a s s e s s m e n t that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave t o withdraw is GRANTED, U n i t e d S t a te s C o u r t o f A p p e al s

F i f t h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D June 18, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R
. R

. 47. 5, the court has d eterm ined that this op inion should not be p ublis hed and is not p reced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum s tances s et forth in 5 T H C I R
. R. 47. 5. 4. Case: 12-10714 Document: 00512277576 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/18/2013No. 12-10714

counsel is excused from further responsibilities he r e i n, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 T H C I R
. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 12-10714 Document: 00512277576 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/18/2013