alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

In connection with this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of Foundation Coal Corporation for the period ended March 31, 2006, I, James F. Roberts Chief Executive Officer of Foundation Coal Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | This Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in this Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Foundation Coal Corporation.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |                                         
|------------------ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------
|                   |  |  |  | 
|                   |  |  |  | 
|Date: May 12, 2006 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    JAMES F. ROBERTS                 
|                   |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | James F. Roberts Chief Executive
Officer
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6333

CW Bearing USA, Inc:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5257 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5257

 To amend the Agricultural Credit Act of 1978 to enhance the long-term 
           protection of watersheds, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 22, 2023

  Mr. Nunn of Iowa (for himself, Mr. Davis of North Carolina, and Mr. 
Jackson of Illinois) introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                    to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Agricultural Credit Act of 1978 to enhance the long-term 
           protection of watersheds, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    Section 403 of the Agricultural Credit Act of 1978 (16 U.S.C. 2203) 
is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following:
    ``(b) Level of Restoration.--The Secretary may allow restoration 
above pre-disaster conditions if that restoration is in the best 
interest of the long-term health and protection of the watershed.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Rico ELLIOTT, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent.

No. 67155.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Oct. 24, 1995.

Susan K. Eckles, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Fernando Bermudez, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and WHITE, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6846

United Scope LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_05.09.19.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
Amdmnt No. 4 to Registrant's Second Amended and Restated 2005 Omnibus Stock Plan



 Exhibit 10.2 

AMENDMENT NO. 4 

TO THE 

VARIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. 

SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED 

2005 OMNIBUS STOCK PLAN 

Varian Medical Systems, Inc. having previously established the Varian Medical Systems, Inc. Second Amended and Restated 2005 Omnibus
Stock Plan (the “Plan”), hereby amends the Plan as follows: 
 Section 4.1 is amended by the insertion of the
following before the last sentence of Section 4.1: 
 Effective upon approval of this amendment by the stockholders of the
Company, an additional 5.5 million Shares shall be available for issuance under the Plan. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Varian
Medical Systems, Inc., by its duly authorized officer, has executed the Plan on the date indicated below. 
  

									
		 		 	VARIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
					
	 Dated: 
	 	February 11, 2010	 		 	By: 	 	/s/    JOHN W. KUO
		 		 		 		 	John W. Kuo
		 		 		 		 	Corporate Vice President,
		 		 		 		 	General Counsel & Secretary
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re 7677 Real Street, LLC, 5805 Washington Avenue Trust, Nitzan 

Ben-Nun, and Sonoma Apartments, LLC, Relators

Appellate case number: 01-16-00683-CV

Trial court case number: 2013-43259

Trial court: 234th District Court of Harris County

On February 13, 2017, this Court issued an order asking the parties to provide a status 

report in this original proceeding. On February 16, 2017, counsel for relators and real party in 

interest filed responses, advising the Court that the parties were in the process of drafting a final 

settlement agreement.

Accordingly, we ORDER this cause abated for 45 days to allow the parties to complete 

settlement negotiations and to obtain any necessary bankruptcy court approval. 

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s active 

docket. The court will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the proceeding filed by 

either party, or the court may reinstate the proceeding on its own motion. 

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: _/s/ Harvey Brown

 Acting individually 

Date: February 23, 2017
**EXHIBIT 32.02**

** **

**Section 1350 Certification**

** **

**In connection with this quarterlyreport of ML Aspect FuturesAccess LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I, Barbra E. Kocsis, ChiefFinancial Officer of Merrill Lynch Alternative Investments LLC, the manager ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:**

 

1. This Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.  The information contained in this Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:                                         | May 15, 2009     |   |
|-----------------------------------------------|-----------------------|--------|
|                                          |                  |
| By                                            | /s/  BARBRA E. KOCSIS |   |
| Barbra  E. Kocsis                             |                  |
| Chief  Financial Officer                      |                  |
| (Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer) |                  |

 

----
<Page>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.01

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with this quarterly report of ML Cornerstone FuturesAccess LLC
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this "Report"), I,
Robert M. Alderman, Chief Executive Officer, President and Manager of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: November 14, 2005
-----------------------

By /s/ ROBERT M. ALDERMAN
   ----------------------
Robert M. Alderman
Chief Executive Officer, President and Manager
(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit
31.1





CERTIFICATIONS





I,
Gregory Lykiardopoulos certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Triton Distribution Systems,
Inc.:





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.








Date:
July 8,
2008                           By:/s/Gregory
Lykiardopoulos


Gregory Lykiardopoulos


Chief Executive Officer
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

April 12, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6559

Apex Sourcing & Manufacturing: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_04.15.19.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
**Exhibit      32**

**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF      FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO**

**18      U.S.C.  SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| Dated:                December 13, 2007  | By:  /s/                Gregory                Lykiardopoulos    *                                        **        *Gregory                  Lykiardopoulos*        *Chief                  Executive Officer  |
|-----------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:                December 13, 2007  | By:                 /s/ Michael W. Overby                              Michael                  W. Overby        Chief                  Financial                  Officer  |
|-----------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### Ricky HARRISON, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee. Eugene SMITH, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee.

Nos. 91-CA-1265-MR, 91-CA-1276-MR.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

June 5, 1992.

Discretionary Review Denied by Supreme Court Jan. 13, 1993.

*532Marguerite Neill Thomas, Asst. Public Advocate, Frankfort, for appellants.

Chris Gorman, Atty. Gen., Todd D. Ferguson, Laura Early, Asst. Attys. Gen., Frankfort, for appellee.

PER CURIAM:

These appeals are from the denial of RCr 11.42 relief in which the appellants argue that persistent felony offender enhancement under KRS 532.080 is not applicable to violations of Chapter 218A, the Controlled Substance Act. Appellants pled guilty to trafficking in a controlled substance (cocaine) and to being persistent felony offenders in the second degree. They rely primarily upon the decision in *Offutt v. Commonwealth,*Ky., 799 S.W.2d 815 (1990), and *Berry v. Commonwealth,*Ky., 782 S.W.2d 625 (1990). These two cases have been consolidated for decisional purposes.

Even though it is questionable whether this issue is preserved for appellate review since the appellants plead guilty to being persistent felony offenders in the second degree, and they are not arguing the indictments do not state a crime nor that their pleas were involuntarily entered, we will nevertheless address the merits.

Appellants argue that trafficking in a controlled substance is proscribed in KRS 218A which is outside the penal code and has its own specific sentencing structure, thereby rendering KRS 532.080 inapplicable.

In the *Offutt*and *Berry*cases, both murder cases, the Kentucky Supreme Court held that KRS 532.060 (and therefore KRS 532.080) does not apply in a murder case since murder is classified as a capital offense, a specific type of felony for which a penalty is imposed pursuant to KRS 532.-030(1). KRS 532.060 sets the term of imprisonment in all felonies except capital offenses.

A reading of *Berry*and *Offutt*clearly indicate both cases only apply in murder cases. No extension was made to drug cases. In fact, the Court in *Berry*stated, at 627, that “punishment in *all*other felonies is provided in KRS 532.060(2).”

Although not the primary issue before the Court in *Dawson v. Commonwealth,*Ky., 756 S.W.2d 935 (1988), the Kentucky Supreme Court did permit the use of the persistent felony offender statute, KRS 532.080, in a drug conviction case. It merely asserted the trial court could not sentence under *both*KRS 218A and KRS 532.-080, but could choose one or the other.

The judgments of the trial courts are affirmed.

All concur.
INPUT

.05

80
Consistent with USTR's Section 301 notice, OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. requests

confidential treatment for the information designated as business confidential in this submission. Such

information consists of information that would not customarily be released to the public, including

business or trade secrets regarding production costs and processes, data on sales, product characteristics

customers, destinations, and other product, sales, and cost-related business secrets. Business confidential

information has been indicated herein by enclosing it in single brackets (“[ ]”). A public version of these

comments is also being filed with all confidential information removed.

OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. submits this exclusion request on behalf of our business

unit. OMRON in the US is the only designer of this product and only supplier of this component.

KNOB,BENCH is a plastic switch knob actuator and is used only automotive purposes of a power seat

switch which moves a passenger seat, of which is an OEM-specified dimension. It is only used for

further assembly of components which go into domestic automobile production, which is specified by

auto manufacturer.

This product is not a target of the US Administration's 301 investigation regarding Intellectual Property

concerns. This is not a concern to IP transfer and impressment. This product contains no IP of interest

related to autonomous vehicle production.

The tariff action ultimately poses a risk of significant damage to OMRON, the domestic automobile

industry, and ultimately the US consumer as a increase in price. Like in the case of similar approvals for

vehicle components at the HTS level, OMRON views this product in the same manner. Immediate

movement of production to a US manufacturer or another country would pose significant re-tooling

costs, significant amounts of time, and approvals pertaining to consumer automobile safety standards are

costly and would take a significant amount of time to obtain.

OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. believes that CBP can easily exclude the KNOB,BENCH

in question based solely on the product description. The following are draft CBP exclusion instructions:

"KNOB,BENCH for POWER SEAT SWITCH; rectangular plastic bench knob with rounded ends with

two flat latches on either end which run parallel to the length of the knob (shale color);Made of plastic

resin - ABS with paint (gideon); dimensions 61.00mm X 20.00mm X 11.80mm.."

This information will be contained on the invoice from the supplier.