29806 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 105 / Thursday, June 3, 2021 / Notices 

1The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 

CFR 207.2(f)). 

Issued: May 27, 2021. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2021–11619 Filed 6–2–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–521 and 731– 

TA–1252–1255 and 1257 (Review)] 

Steel Nails From Korea, Malaysia, 

Oman, Taiwan, and Vietnam 

Determinations 

On the basis of the record 1 developed 

in the subject five-year reviews, the 

United States International Trade 

Commission (‘‘Commission’’) 

determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 

1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the 

countervailing duty order on steel nails 

from Vietnam and the antidumping duty 

orders on steel nails from Korea, 

Malaysia, Oman, Taiwan, and Vietnam 

would be likely to lead to continuation 

or recurrence of material injury to an 

industry in the United States within a 

reasonably foreseeable time. 

Background 

The Commission instituted these 

reviews on June 1, 2020 (85 FR 33195) 

and determined on September 4, 2020 

that it would conduct expedited reviews 

(86 FR 26545, May 14, 2021). 

The Commission made these 

determinations pursuant to section 

751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It 

completed and filed its determinations 

in these reviews on May 28, 2021. The 

views of the Commission are contained 

in USITC Publication 5200 (May 2021), 

entitled Steel Nails from Korea, 

Malaysia, Oman, Taiwan, and Vietnam: 

Investigation Nos. 701–TA–521 and 

731–TA–1252–1255 and 1257 (Review). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: May 28, 2021. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2021–11703 Filed 6–2–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1260] 

Certain Toner Supply Containers and 

Components Thereof (II); Commission 

Determination Not To Review an Initial 

Determination Granting Complainants’ 

Unopposed Motion To Amend the 

Complaint and Notice of Investigation 

AGENCY: International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) 

(Order No. 6) of the presiding 

administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) 

granting complainants’ unopposed 

motion to amend the complaint and 

notice of investigation in the abovecaptioned investigation to correct the 

identification of a respondent. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Richard P. Hadorn, Esq., Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

205–3179. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. 

Hearing-impaired persons are advised 

that information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal, telephone 

(202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 

13, 2021, the Commission instituted this 

investigation based on a complaint filed 

by Canon Inc. of Tokyo, Japan; Canon 

U.S.A., Inc. of Melville, New York; and 

Canon Virginia, Inc. of Newport News, 

Virginia (collectively, ‘‘Canon’’). 86 FR 

19287–88 (Apr. 13, 2021). The 

complaint, as supplemented, alleges 

violations of section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 

1337), based on the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

and the sale within the United States 

after importation of certain toner supply 

containers and components thereof by 

reason of infringement of certain claims 

of thirteen patents: U.S. Patent Nos. 

10,209,667; 10,289,060; 10,289,061; 

10,295,957; 10,488,814; 10,496,032; 

10,496,033; 10,514,654; 10,520,881; 

10,520,882; 8,565,649 (‘‘the ’649 

patent’’); 9,354,551 (‘‘the ’551 patent’’); 

and 9,753,402 (‘‘the ’402 patent’’). Id. at 

19287. The complaint further alleges 

that a domestic industry exists. Id. The 

Commission instituted two separate 

investigations and defined the scope of 

the present investigation as whether 

there is a violation of section 337 based 

on the allegations of infringement as to 

the asserted claims of the ’649, ’551, and 

’402 patents as to the accused products 

identified in the notice of investigation. 

Id. The notice of investigation named 

eleven respondents: Sichuan XingDian 

Technology Co., Ltd. of Sichuan, China; 

Sichuan Wiztoner Technology Co., Ltd. 

of Sichuan, China; 

Anhuiyatengshangmaoyouxiangongsi of 

Ganyuqu, China; ChengDuXiangChang

NanShiYouSheBeiYouXianGongSi of 

SiChuanSheng, China; Digital Marketing 

Corporation d/b/a Digital Buyer 

Marketing Company of Los Angeles, 

California; Do It Wiser, LLC d/b/a Image 

Toner (‘‘Do It Wiser’’) of Wilmington, 

Delaware; 

Hefeierlandianzishangwuyouxiangongsi 

of Chengdushi, China; Shenzhenshi 

Keluodeng Kejiyouxiangognsi of 

Guangdong, China; MITOCOLOR INC. 

of Rowland Heights, California; Xianshi 

yanliangqu canqiubaihuodianshanghang 

of Shanxisheng, China; and Zhuhai 

Henyun Image Co., Ltd. of Zhuhai, 

China. Id. The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations is also named as a party. 

Id. at 19287–88. The question of 

whether there is a violation of section 

337 based on the allegations of 

infringement as to the asserted claims of 

the remaining patents is the subject of 

the severed investigation based on the 

same complaint, Inv. No. 337–TA–1259. 

See 86 FR 19284–86 (Apr. 13, 2021). 

On April 27, 2021, Canon filed a 

motion to amend the complaint and 

notice of investigation to change the 

identification of respondent Do It Wiser 

from ‘‘Do It Wiser, LLC d/b/a Image 

Toner’’ to ‘‘Do It Wiser, Inc. d/b/a Image 

Toner’’ and to make related changes in 

paragraph 31 of the complaint. The 

motion states that (i) OUII does not 

oppose the motion and (ii) Do It Wiser’s 

counsel in a parallel district court 

lawsuit informed Canon that Do It Wiser 

‘‘will not be participating in this 

investigation and does not oppose this 

motion.’’ Mot. at 1. No responses to the 

motion were filed. 

On May 17, 2021, the ALJ issued the 

subject ID granting the motion. The ID 

finds that, in accordance with 

Commission Rule 210.14(b) (19 CFR 

210.14(b)), ‘‘Canon has shown good 

cause to amend the complaint and 

notice of investigation to correct the 

identification of the respondent 

identified in the original complaint as 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 105 / Thursday, June 3, 2021 / Notices 29807 

Do It Wiser, LLC d/b/a Image Toner.’’ ID 

at 2. No petitions for review of the 

subject ID were filed. 

The Commission has determined not 

to review the subject ID. The complaint 

and notice of investigation are amended 

to change the identification of 

respondent Do It Wiser from ‘‘Do It 

Wiser, LLC d/b/a Image Toner’’ to ‘‘Do 

It Wiser, Inc. d/b/a Image Toner’’ and to 

make related changes in paragraph 31 of 

the complaint. 

The Commission vote for this 

determination took place on May 27, 

2021. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 

210 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 

210). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: May 28, 2021. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2021–11702 Filed 6–2–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1246] 

Certain Integrated Circuits and 

Products Containing the Same; 

Commission Determination Not To 

Review an Initial Determination 

Granting Complainant’s Motion To 

Terminate the Investigation Based on 

Settlement; Termination of the 

Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission (‘‘Commission’’) has 

determined not to review an initial 

determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 18) of 

the presiding administrative law judge 

(‘‘ALJ’’) terminating the investigation in 

its entirety based on settlement. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Benjamin S. Richards, Esq., Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

708–5453. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. 

Hearing-impaired persons are advised 

that information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 

205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on February 12, 2021 based on an 

amended complaint filed by 

complainant Tela Innovations, Inc. of 

Los Gatos, CA (‘‘Tela’’). 86 FR 9369 

(Feb. 12, 2021). The complaint, as 

amended, alleged violations of section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, or the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain integrated circuits and products 

containing the same by reason of 

infringement of claims 1–11, 14–20, 25, 

and 26 of U.S. Patent No. 10,186,523. Id. 

at 9370. The complaint further alleged 

that a domestic industry exists. Id. The 

Commission’s notice of investigation 

named as respondents Acer, Inc. of New 

Taipei City, Taiwan; Acer America 

Corporation of San Jose, CA; ASUSTek 

Computer Inc. of Taipei, Taiwan; ASUS 

Computer International of Fremont, CA; 

Intel Corporation of Santa Clara, CA; 

Lenovo Group Ltd. of Beijing, China; 

Lenovo (United States) Inc. of 

Morrisville, NC; Micro-Star 

International Co., Ltd. of New Taipei 

City, Taiwan; and MSI Computer Corp. 

of City of Industry, CA. Id. The Office 

of Unfair Import Investigations is 

participating in the investigation. Id. 

On May 11, 2021, Tela moved, 

without opposition, to terminate this 

investigation in its entirety based on 

settlement pursuant to Commission 

Rule 210.21(b). 19 CFR 210.21(b). On 

May 13, 2021, the ALJ issued Order No. 

18, terminating the investigation in its 

entirety based on settlement. No 

petitions for review of the ID were filed. 

The Commission has determined not 

to review the subject ID. 

The investigation is hereby 

terminated in its entirety. 

The Commission vote for this 

determination took place on May 27, 

2021. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 

210 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 

210). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: May 27, 2021. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2021–11620 Filed 6–2–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1181] 

Certain Lithium-Ion Battery Cells, 

Battery Modules, Battery Packs, 

Components Thereof, and Products 

Containing the Same; Commission 

Determination To Grant a Joint Motion 

To Terminate the Investigation on the 

Basis of a Settlement Agreement; 

Termination of the Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined to grant a 

joint motion to terminate the abovecaptioned investigation based on a 

settlement agreement. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Ronald A. Traud, Esq., Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

205–3427. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. 

Hearing-impaired persons are advised 

that information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 

205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

November 4, 2019, the Commission 

instituted this investigation based on a 

complaint filed by LG Chem, Ltd. of 

Seoul, Republic of Korea; LG Chem 

Michigan Inc. of Holland, Michigan; and 

Toray Industries, Inc. of Tokyo, Japan. 

84 FR 59415 (Nov. 4, 2019). The 

complaint, as supplemented, alleged 

violations of section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 

1337, due to the importation into the 

United States, sale for importation, or 

sale in the United States after 

importation of certain lithium-ion 

battery cells, battery modules, battery 

packs, components thereof, and 

products containing the same that 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES