alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 62 (Friday, March 31, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 16652]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7915]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Brazosport, Corporation; Acquisition of Company Engaged in 
Permissible Nonbanking Activities

    The organization listed in this notice has applied under Sec.  
225.23(a)(2) or (f) of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.23(a)(2) or 
(f)) for the Board's approval under section 4(c)(8) of the Bank Holding 
Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843(c)(8)) and Sec.  225.21(a) of Regulation Y 
(12 CFR 225.21(a)) to acquire or control voting securities or assets of 
a company engaged in a nonbanking activity that is listed in Sec.  
225.25 of Regulation Y as closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, such activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    The application is available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. Once the application has been accepted 
for processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing on the question whether consummation of the proposal can 
``reasonably be expected to produce benefits to the public, such as 
greater convenience, increased competition, or gains in efficiency, 
that outweigh possible adverse effects, such as undue concentration of 
resources, decreased or unfair competition, conflicts of interests, or 
unsound banking practices.'' Any request for a hearing on this question 
must be accompanied by a statement of the reasons a written 
presentation would not suffice in lieu of a hearing, identifying 
specifically any questions of fact that are in dispute, summarizing the 
evidence that would be presented at a hearing, and indicating how the 
party commenting would be aggrieved by approval of the proposal.
    Comments regarding the application must be received at the Reserve 
Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than 
April 14, 1995.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (Genie D. Short, Vice President) 
2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Brazosport, Corporation, Freeport, Texas; to acquire First 
Commerce Mortgage Corporation, Corpus Christi, Texas, and thereby 
engage in making, acquiring, or servicing loans for itself or for 
others, and loan marketing and advisory services, pursuant to Sec.  
225.25(b)(1) of the Board's Regulation Y. The geographic scope for 
these activities is Corpus Christi, Texas, Brazosport Area, which 
includes Freeport, Lake Jackson and Clute, Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 27, 
1995.
William W. Wiles,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-7915 Filed 3-30-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
Conceptus, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:



Date:
March 31, 2005

|/s/MARK M. SIECZKAREKMark M. Sieczkarek
President and Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---



Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
Conceptus, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:



Date:
March 31, 2005

|/s/GREGORY E. LICHTWARDTGregory E. Lichtwardt
Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>1,000

<S>                                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                            YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                 DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                      DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                                  4,309
<SECURITIES>                                                            2,337
<RECEIVABLES>                                                           7,758
<ALLOWANCES>                                                              381
<INVENTORY>                                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                            0
<PP&E>                                                                  2,003
<DEPRECIATION>                                                          1,649
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                         20,174
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                     900
<BONDS>                                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                                             19,274
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                           20,174
<SALES>                                                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                        3,771
<CGS>                                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                           2,381
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                          484
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                         29
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                         1,390
<INCOME-TAX>                                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                     1,390
<DISCONTINUED>                                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                                            1,390
<EPS-BASIC>                                                             .78
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                               0


</TABLE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7799

MAHLE Behr USA, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
#### William A. VENZ, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Tamara E. VENZ, Respondent-Appellant.

No. 65272.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Nov. 1, 1994.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Dec. 14, 1994.

William Lyman Johnson, Mary J. Lake, Hillsboro, for appellant.

John W. Hammon, Hillsboro, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Tamara E. Venz (“wife”), appeals from a default decree of dissolution entered in the Circuit Court of Jefferson County granting respondent, William A. Venz (“husband”), custody of the parties’ two minor children. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the findings and conclusions of the circuit court are not clearly erroneous. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the circuit court’s order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum solely for the use the parties here involved has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-7462

Nissan North America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SpeechSwitch, Inc. ("the Company") on
Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Bruce
R. Knef, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



          Date: February 7, 2007


          By /s/ Bruce R. Knef
             ---------------------------
             Bruce R. Knef
             President, Chief Executive Officer
             and Principal Financial Officer
**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**AND      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

| 1.     | Such                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending July 30,                2006 , fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                               |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
| 2.     | The                information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for                the period ending July 30, 2006 , fairly presents, in all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                Medarts Medical System, Inc. |

*/s/      Zhou Peiyu*
---

EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18
U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Report of SOLAR ENERTECH CORP. (the
Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report"), I, Fang
Xie, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|Date: May 18, 2007 | By:
      /s/Fang Xie      
|------------------ | ---------------------------
|                   |                            
|                   | Fang Xie                   
|                   | Principal Financial Officer



---
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 11-10402 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. CHARLES LAVON BREWER, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 6:11-CR-3-1
Before GARZA, SOUTHWICK, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointe d to represent Charles Lavon Brewer has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Brewer has not fil e d a r e sponse. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and t h e relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate revi e w . A c c o rdingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Decem ber 2 2, 2 011 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm inedt hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 11-10402 Document: 00511704694 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/22/2011No. 11-10402

G RANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, a n d t h e APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See5 T H C I R
. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 11-10402 Document: 00511704694 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/22/2011
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6526
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JIMMY LEE SADLER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CR-93-160, CA-03-160-6-20AK) Submitted: June 12, 2003 Decided: June 19, 2003 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jimmy Lee Sadler, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Jimmy Lee Sadler, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Sadler , Nos. CR-93-160; CA-03-160-6-20AK (D.S.C. Feb. 28, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. LEO N A RD O N I CO LA S- BLA S, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 11- 50412 D. C . No . 2 : 1 1 - c r - 0 0 1 3 6 - OD W ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia O t i s D . W r i ght , I I , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d M a y14, 2013 ** B efo re: L E A V Y , T H O M A S , an d M U R G U IA , C i rcu i tJu d g es. L e ona r do N i c ol a s - B l a s appe a l s f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e nta nd c ha l l e nge s the 46- m onth s e nt e nc e i m pos e d f ol l ow i ng hi s gui l ty - pl e ac onvi c t i on f or c o n s p i r a c yt o h a rb o ra n d c o n c e a l i l l e g a l a l i e n s , i n v i o l a t i o n o f 8 U . S. C. § 1 3 2 4 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( A) ( v ) ( I ) . We h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U. S . C . § 1 2 9 1 , a n d we 

# FI LED MA Y20 2 013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 50412 2 a f f i rm. N i c ol a s - B l a s c ont e nds tha tthe di s tr i c tc ourte rr e d byde ny i ng hi s r e que s tf or a r ol e a dj ustm entpu rs uantt o U . S . S . G . § 3 B 1. 2. T he re cord ref l ec t s thatthe court p r o p e r lyc o n s id e r e d N ic o la s - B la s ’s c o n d u c t a s c o m p a r e d to th e o th e rp a rtic ip a n ts i n th e co n sp i racy i n assessi n g w h eth er t o g ran tth e ad j u stm en t . B ecau se N i co l asB l a s f a i l e d t o pr ove tha the w a s s ubs t a nt i a l l yl e s s c ul pabl e tha n the a ve r a ge p a rtic ip a n t, th e d is tr ic t c o u rt d id n o t c le a r lye rrb yd e n y in g th e a d ju s tm e n t. See U .S .S .G . § 3 B 1 .2 c m t. n .3 ( A ) ; U n ite d S ta te s v . Ca n tr e ll , 433 F . 3d 1269, 1282- 83 (9th C i r. 20 06 ). N i c ol a s - B l a s ne xtc ont e nds tha tthe di s tr i c tc ourtvi ol a t e d F e de r a l R ul e of C ri m i nal P roce du re 32 (i )( 3)(B ) by f ai l i ng t o add re ss hi s argum entthathi s c ri m i nal h is to ryc a te g o ryw a s o v e r s ta te d . N ic o la s - B la s ’s c o n te n tio n is w ith o u t m e r it because hi s l egal chal l enge di d n ottri gg erthe di stri ctcourt ’ s obl i gat i on s und er R u le 3 2 , w h ic h o n lyap p lie s to f a c tu a l c h a lle n g e s to th e p r e s e n te n c e r e p o rt. See U n i ted S ta tes v. P etri , N o. 11- 30337, 2013 W L 1490604, a t*7 ( 9th C i r . A pr . 12, 20 13 ). AF F I RME D.
Exhibit 32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of American Tax Credit Trust, a Delaware statutory business trust Series I (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-K for the year ended March 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James Hussey, Chief Financial Officer of Richman American Credit Corp., manager of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.









/s/James Hussey


James Hussey


Chief Financial Officer of Richman American


Credit Corp., Manager of the Registrant


June 28, 2011
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-6966

General Motors:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel