30288 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 107 / Monday, June 7, 2021 / Notices 

NMFS announces public hearing 

webinars for the Amendment 13 

proposed rule and DEIS. The proposed 

rule and a Notice of Availability of the 

DEIS published in separate Federal 

Register documents. The proposed rule 

published on May 21, 2021 (86 FR 

27686) with a 60-day comment period, 

ending July 20, 2021. The proposed 

measures are as listed in the summary. 

The specifics of the proposed 

management measures are provided in 

the proposed rule and DEIS and are not 

repeated here. Until the proposed rule 

and environmental analyses are 

finalized or until other regulations are 

put into place, the current regulations 

remain in effect. 

NMFS encourages participation by all 

people affected by or otherwise 

interested in recreational and 

commercial HMS fishing to participate 

in the public hearing webinars, at which 

NMFS will provide information on the 

proposed management measures and 

take questions and comments from the 

public. Participants are encouraged to 

log on and/or call into the public 

webinars, at the dates and times listed 

in Table 1 below. Requests for sign 

language interpretation or other 

auxiliary aids should be directed to Tom 

Warren or Carrie Soltanoff, at least 7 

days prior to the meeting. 

In addition to the dates and times in 

Table 1, NMFS has requested time on 

the agenda at the five Atlantic based 

Fishery Management Council meetings. 

If added to the Council agendas, the 

dates and times would be included in 

the agenda for those individual 

meetings and are not provided here. 

TABLE 1—DATES, TIMES, AND DETAILS OF THE PUBLIC HEARING WEBINARS

Date Time Details on how to join the webinar: see website 

June 8, 2021 ............ 2 to 4 p.m .............. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/action/amendment-13-2006-consolidated-hms-fishery-managementplan-bluefin-management-measures. 

July 8, 2021 ............. 2 to 4 p.m .............. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/action/amendment-13-2006-consolidated-hms-fishery-managementplan-bluefin-management-measures. 

July 14, 2021 ........... 2 to 4 p.m .............. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/action/amendment-13-2006-consolidated-hms-fishery-managementplan-bluefin-management-measures. 

The public is reminded that NMFS 

expects participants at the public 

hearing webinars to conduct themselves 

appropriately. At the beginning of each 

webinar, a representative of NMFS will 

explain the ground rules (e.g., attendees 

will be called to give their comments in 

the order in which they registered to 

speak; each attendee will have an equal 

amount of time to speak; and attendees 

should not interrupt one another). The 

NMFS representative will attempt to 

structure the webinar so that all 

attending members of the public will be 

able to comment, if they so choose. 

Attendees are expected to respect the 

ground rules, and, if they do not, they 

may be asked to leave the webinar. 

Authority: 16 U.S.C. 971 et seq.; 16 U.S.C. 

1801 et seq. 

Dated: June 1, 2021. 

Jennifer M. Wallace, 

Acting Director, Office of Sustainable 

Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service. 

[FR Doc. 2021–11833 Filed 6–4–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–22–P 

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY 

COMMISSION 

[Docket No. CPSC–2020–0019] 

Notice of Availability of Regulatory 

Flexibility Act Section 610 Review of 

the Safety Standards for the Testing 

and Labeling Regulations Pertaining to 

Product Certification of Children’s 

Products, Including Reliance on 

Component Part Testing 

AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice of availability. 

SUMMARY: The Consumer Product Safety 

Commission (CPSC or Commission) is 

announcing the availability of a 

completed rule review under section 

610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act 

(RFA) for the Testing and Labeling 

Regulations Pertaining to Product 

Certification of Children’s Products, 

Including Reliance on Component Part 

Testing. This regulatory review 

concludes that the testing and 

component part testing regulations 

should be maintained without change. 

ADDRESSES: The completed review is 

available on the CPSC website at: 

https://www.cpsc.gov/s3fs-public/ 

Regulatory-Flexibility-Act-Review-ofTesting-and-Labeling-Regulations.pdf?

rIp6oVfT143VJ29wBQgMbQ1c_

R2jq39w. The completed review will 

also be made available through the 

Federal eRulemaking Portal at: https://

www.regulations.gov, under Docket No. 

CPSC–2020–0019, Supporting and 

Related Materials. Copies may also be 

obtained from the Consumer Product 

Safety Commission, Division of the 

Secretariat, Room 820, 4330 East-West 

Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814; 

telephone: 301–504–7479; email cpscos@cpsc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Susan Proper, Directorate for Economic 

Analysis, Consumer Product Safety 

Commission, 4330 East-West Highway, 

Bethesda, MD 20814; telephone: (301) 

504–7628; email: sproper@cspc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 

November 2011, the Commission issued 

two regulations related to testing: 16 

CFR part 1107, ‘‘Testing and Labeling 

Pertaining to Product Certification’’ 

(testing regulation or part 1107) (76 FR 

69482, November 8, 2011), and 16 CFR 

part 1109, ‘‘Conditions and 

Requirements for Relying on 

Component Part Testing or Certification, 

or Another Party’s Finished Product 

Certification, to Meet Testing and 

Certification Requirements’’ (component 

part regulation or part 1109) (76 FR 

69546, November 8, 2011). When parts 

1107 and 1109 were promulgated in 

2011, the final regulatory flexibility 

analysis found that the third party 

testing requirements in part 1107 would 

have a significant economic impact on 

a substantial number of small entities. 

In contrast, the final regulatory 

flexibility analysis for the component 

part regulation in part 1109 found that 

the regulation would not likely have a 

significant impact on a substantial 

number of small entities because 

component part testing is not 

mandatory. However, OMB determined 

that both 1107 and 1109 were 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 107 / Monday, June 7, 2021 / Notices 30289 

1The CRA defines a ‘‘major rule’’ as one that has 

resulted in or is likely to result in (1) an annual 

effect on the economy of $100 million or more; (2) 

a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, 

individual industries, federal, state, or local 

government agencies, or geographic regions; or (3) 

significant adverse effects on competition, 

employment, investment, productivity, or 

innovation, or on the ability of United States-based 

enterprises to compete with foreign-based 

enterprises in domestic and export markets. 5 

U.S.C. 804(2). 

considered ‘‘major rules’’ under the 

Congressional Review Act (CRA).1

On August 24, 2020, the Commission 

published notice in the Federal Register 

(85 FR 52078) to announce that the 

CPSC would review the testing and 

component part testing regulations in 

accordance with the regulatory review 

provisions of section 610 of the RFA (5 

U.S.C. 610). The CPSC sought public 

comment on the rule review. This 

document announces the availability of 

the completed regulatory review under 

section 610 of the testing and 

component part testing regulations. 

The purpose of a rule review under 

section 610 of the RFA is to determine 

whether, consistent with the CPSC’s 

statutory obligations, these standards 

should be maintained without change, 

rescinded, or modified to minimize any 

significant impact of the rule on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

Section 610 requires agencies to 

consider five factors in reviewing rules 

to minimize any significant economic 

impact of the rule on a substantial 

number of small entities including: 

(1) The continued need for the rule; 

(2) The nature of complaints or 

comments received concerning the rule 

from the public; 

(3) The complexity of the rule; 

(4) The extent to which the rule 

overlaps, duplicates or conflicts with 

other Federal rules, and, to the extent 

feasible, with State and local 

governmental rules; and 

(5) The length of time since the rule 

has been evaluated or the degree to 

which technology, economic conditions, 

or other factors have changed in the area 

affected by the rule. 5 U.S.C. 610(b). 

The CPSC received five written 

comments. The comments came from (1) 

a small business that sells handmade 

items; (2) a small business that sells 

wooden toys and gifts; (3) a small 

importer of European toys; (4) the 

American Apparel & Footwear 

Association (AAFA); and (5) the 

Juvenile Products Manufacturers 

Association (JPMA). Staff’s briefing 

package reviews all of the comments 

and provides staff’s analysis applying 

the factors listed in section 610 of the 

RFA to the testing and component part 

testing regulations. As explained in the 

staff’s briefing package, CPSC staff 

concludes that the testing and 

component part testing regulations 

should be retained without any changes. 

The staff review is available on the 

CPSC’s website at: https://

www.cpsc.gov/s3fs-public/RegulatoryFlexibility-Act-Review-of-Testing-andLabeling-Regulations.pdf?

rIp6oVfT143VJ29wBQgMbQ1c_

R2jq39w, www.regulations.gov, and 

from the Commission’s Division of the 

Secretariat at the location listed in the 

ADDRESSES section of this notice. 

Alberta E. Mills, 

Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety 

Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2021–11837 Filed 6–4–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6355–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Docket ID: DoD–2021–OS–0043] 

Submission for OMB Review; 

Comment Request 

AGENCY: Office of the Under Secretary of 

Defense for Personnel and Readiness, 

Department of Defense (DoD). 

ACTION: Information collection notice. 

SUMMARY: Consistent with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 and 

its implementing regulations, this 

document provides notice DoD is 

submitting an Information Collection 

Request to the Office of Management 

and Budget (OMB) to collect 

information on Service members, DoD 

Civilians, and DoD contractors in 

evaluating 20 high and low risk 

installations as directed in Immediate 

Action 2 in the Secretary of Defense 

Memorandum, ‘‘Immediate Actions to 

Counter Sexual Assault and Harassment 

and the Establishment of a 90-Day 

Independent Review Commission on 

Sexual Assault in the Military,’’ 

February 26, 2021, DoD requests 

emergency processing and OMB 

authorization to collect the information 

after publication of this Notice for a 

period of six months. 

DATES: Comments must be received by 

July 7, 2021. 

ADDRESSES: The Department has 

requested emergency processing from 

OMB for this information collection 

request by 30 days after publication of 

this notice. Interested parties can access 

the supporting materials and collection 

instrument as well as submit comments 

and recommendations to OMB at 

www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. 

Find this particular information 

collection by selecting ‘‘Currently under 

30-day Review—Open for Public 

Comments’’ or by using the search 

function. Comments submitted in 

response to this notice will be 

summarized and included in the request 

for OMB approval of this information 

collection. They will also become a 

matter of public record. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Angela Duncan, 571–372–7574, or 

whs.mc-alex.esd.mbx.dd-dodinformation-collections@mail.mil. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: These 

information collections support an 

emergent, high-visibility Secretary of 

Defense requirement directed in 

February 2021 to conduct evaluations of 

20 DoD installations where the military 

community is at increased or decreased 

risk for destructive behaviors as 

evidenced by measures of unhealthy 

command climate. Site visits will take 

place June-August 2021, report 

development in August 2021, Military 

Department coordination in September 

2021 and delivery of the report to the 

Secretary by Oct 2021. Given the 

aggressive timelines the purpose of the 

initial high risk installation evaluations 

is to pilot an evaluation process and 

metrics in order to develop an enduring 

evaluation method to support future 

evaluations (expected to be conducted 

on biennial basis). DoD Office of Force 

Resiliency (OFR) will identify 20 DoD 

installations to take part in the 

assessment. At each location, a handful 

of DoD personnel who either have direct 

responsibility for prevention activities 

or their superiors will participate. There 

will be three data sources: (1) 

Responding to a ‘‘request for 

information’’; (2) participating in 

discussions during a three day site visit; 

and (3) completing a survey. 

Title; Associated Form; and OMB 

Number: High Risk Installation 

Evaluations; OMB Control Number 

0704–HRIE. 

Type of Request: New. 

Number of Respondents: 4,400. 

Responses per Respondent: 1. 

Annual Responses: 4,400. 

Average Burden per Response: 70 

minutes. 

Annual Burden Hours: 5,134 hours. 

Affected Public: Individuals or 

households. 

Frequency: Biennial. 

Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary. 

Request for Comments: Comments are 

invited on: (1) Whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of DoD, including whether the 

information collected has practical 

utility; (2) the accuracy of DoD’s 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES