U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Columbia Plateau Conservation Research Center: Pendleton, OR
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Related TopicsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Pendleton, Oregon Columbia Plateau Conservation Research Center Research Publications at this Location





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Title:   Author  item
                                            Wuest, Stewartitem
                                            CORP, MARY - OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY
  Submitted to: Agronomy Abstracts
                                    Publication Type: Abstract Only
                                    Publication Acceptance Date: 10/4/2008
                                    Publication  Date: 10/4/2008
                                    Citation: Wuest, S.B., Corp, M.K. 2008. Evaluation of Fallow Methods Study: No-till, Reduced Tillage, & Traditional Fallow. Agronomy Abstracts.Interpretive Summary:
                                Technical Abstract: Water storage in the fallow year is a critical component of wheat-fallow production systems used in the Columbia Plateau region of Oregon, Washington and Idaho. In low to intermediate rainfall zones timely stand establishment depends on being able to seed into stored seed-zone moisture. Three years of research compared water storage in four fallow systems: chemical fallow (CF), reduced tillage fallow (RTF) using an undercutter followed by herbicides, reduced tillage fallow using an undercutter followed by rodding (UR) and traditional  tillage fallow (TF) in an intermediate rainfall (12-14 inch) zone. The study examined seed-zone moisture conditions and overall impact to soil moisture storage. Measurements of crop residue levels were taken following planting. Yield data was collected. Three years of soil water data showed CF averaged less water in the top 0.3 m and more at 1.2 to 1.5 m than the other three treatments.  Total water in the 1.5 m profile showed no significant differences. Seed-zone moisture data demonstrated differences in gravimetric water content between 0.05 and 0.10 m depths that varied from year to year. The differences were smaller and less statistically significant when the sampling depths were corrected for bulk density. Crop residue levels were found to be significantly different with CF being the highest, followed by RTF and TF. Yield data has been collected for two years on TF, CF, and RTF. The TF treatment had a significantly higher yield than CF and RTF. There were not significant differences in yield between CF and RTF. In summary, amount of soil moisture and its placement in the profile appeared to be the most critical factor. RTF and CF provided higher surface residue levels, but yields were reduced under these systems. Yield advantage was due to earlier stand establishment under TF.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov