Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 109 / Wednesday, June 9, 2021 / Rules and Regulations 30545 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

C. Petitions for Judicial Review 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by August 9, 2021. Filing a 

petition for reconsideration by the 

Administrator of this final rule does not 

affect the finality of this action for the 

purposes of judicial review nor does it 

extend the time within which a petition 

for judicial review may be filed, and 

shall not postpone the effectiveness of 

such rule or action. This action, 

approving PADEP’s second maintenance 

plan for the Tioga County Area for the 

1997 ozone NAAQS, may not be 

challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

Dated: May 28, 2021. 

Diana Esher, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region III. 

For the reasons stated in the 

preamble, the EPA amends 40 CFR part 

52 as follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart NN—Pennsylvania 

■ 2. In § 52.2020, the table in paragraph 

(e)(1) is amended by adding the entry 

‘‘Second Maintenance Plan for the State 

College 1997 8-Hour Ozone 

Nonattainment Area’’ at the end of the 

table to read as follows: 

§ 52.2020 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(e) * * * 

(1) * * * 

Name of non-regulatory SIP 

revision 

Applicable 

geographic area 

State 

submittal 

date 

EPA approval date Additional explanation 

*******

Second Maintenance Plan for the 

State College 1997 8-Hour 

Ozone Nonattainment Area.

Tioga County Area .. 3/10/20 6/9/21, [insert Federal Register 

citation].

The Tioga County area consists 

solely of Tioga County. 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2021–11925 Filed 6–8–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R03–OAR–2020–0596; FRL–10024– 

43–Region 3] 

Air Plan Approval; Virginia; Revised 

RACT Permit for Roanoke Electric 

Steel/Steel Dynamics, Inc. 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is approving a state 

implementation plan (SIP) revision 

submitted by the Commonwealth of 

Virginia. The revision consists of 

amendments to a federally enforceable 

state operating permit (FESOP) which 

was previously incorporated into the 

Virginia SIP in order to implement 

reasonably available control technology 

(RACT) for nitrogen oxide (NOX) 

emissions from Steel Dynamics, Inc. 

(hereafter ‘‘SDI,’’ formerly Roanoke 

Electric Steel). This action is being 

taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA). 

DATES: This final rule is effective on July 

9, 2021. 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket ID 

Number EPA–R03–OAR–2020–0596. All 

documents in the docket are listed on 

the https://www.regulations.gov 

website. Although listed in the index, 

some information is not publicly 

available, e.g., confidential business 

information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, is not placed on 

the internet and will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available through https://

www.regulations.gov, or please contact 

the person identified in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section for 

additional availability information. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

David Talley, Planning & 

Implementation Branch (3AD30), Air & 

Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 

Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 

19103. The telephone number is (215) 

814–2117. Mr. Talley can also be 

reached via electronic mail at 

talley.david@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

On March 8, 2021 (86 FR 13254), EPA 

published a notice of proposed 

rulemaking (NPRM) for the 

Commonwealth of Virginia. In the 

NPRM, EPA proposed approval of 

Virginia’s submittal. The formal SIP 

revision was submitted by the Virginia 

Department of Environmental Quality 

(VADEQ) on behalf of the 

Commonwealth on April 14, 2020. 

Prior to the establishment of 

nonattainment areas for the 1997 8-hour 

ozone national ambient air quality 

standards (NAAQS), EPA developed a 

program to allow these potential 

nonattainment areas to voluntarily 

adopt local emission control programs 

to avoid air quality violations and 

mandated nonattainment area controls. 

Areas with air quality meeting the 1979 

1-hour ozone NAAQS were eligible to 

participate. In order to participate, state 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
30546 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 109 / Wednesday, June 9, 2021 / Rules and Regulations 

and local governments and EPA 

developed and signed a memorandum 

of agreement that describes the local 

control measures the state or local 

community intends to adopt and 

implement to reduce ozone emissions in 

advance of air quality violations. In this 

agreement, also known as an Early 

Action Compact (EAC), the state or local 

communities agree to prepare emission 

inventories and conduct air quality 

modeling and monitoring to support its 

selection of emission controls. Areas 

that participated in the EAC program 

had the flexibility to institute their own 

approach in maintaining clean air and 

protecting public health. Several 

localities in the Winchester and 

Roanoke areas elected to participate in 

the EAC program. The areas that signed 

an EAC were the City of Winchester and 

Frederick County, which comprised the 

Northern Shenandoah Valley EAC; and 

the cities of Roanoke and Salem, and the 

counties of Roanoke and Botetourt, 

which comprised the Roanoke EAC. 

VADEQ’s approach to implementing the 

EAC was that RACT be applied to 

sources of NOX and volatile organic 

compounds (VOCs) within those 

localities that were otherwise not 

subject to RACT. The Roanoke Electric 

Steel Corporation, currently SDI, was 

one such source. On April 27, 2005, 

EPA approved a SIP revision for the 

Commonwealth of Virginia which 

incorporated provisions from a federally 

enforceable state operating permit into 

the Virginia SIP in order to apply RACT 

to several units at SDI (Virginia permit 

registration No. 20131, issued December 

22, 2004; hereafter, ‘‘2004 Permit’’). See 

70 FR 21621. 

II. Summary of SIP Revision and EPA 

Analysis 

Virginia’s April 14, 2020 submittal 

includes a revised operating permit for 

SDI which amends the 2004 permit to 

account for changes in operation at the 

facility, including the shut-down of a 

number of units. Since the issuance of 

the 2004 permit (and EPA’s subsequent 

SIP approval), operations at the facility 

have changed, requiring a revision of 

both the operating permit and the 

operating permit provisions 

incorporated into the SIP. The only 

remaining units at the facility that are 

subject to the source specific NOX RACT 

limits of the 2004 permit are Electric 

Arc Furnace (EAF) #5 and the Ladle 

Metallurgical Station (LMS) #5. The 

other units have been removed, replaced 

with equipment that was not subject to 

RACT, or never constructed. The RACT 

limits for those remaining units have 

not changed, and there are no emissions 

increases associated with either the 

revised permit, or Virginia’s proposed 

SIP revision. The permit, and ultimately 

the SIP, are simply being revised to 

account for the removal of provisions 

related to emissions units that no longer 

exist. Other specific requirements of and 

the rationale for EPA’s proposed action 

are explained in the NPRM and will not 

be restated here. 

III. EPA’s Response to Comments 

Received 

EPA received one comment in 

response to the proposed rulemaking. 

The comment was supportive of EPA’s 

proposed action and will not be 

addressed here but is provided in the 

docket for this rulemaking. No adverse 

comments were received. 

IV. Final Action 

EPA is approving VADEQ’s April 14, 

2020 submittal as a revision to the 

Virginia SIP. 

V. General Information Pertaining to 

SIP Submittals From the 

Commonwealth of Virginia 

In 1995, Virginia adopted legislation 

that provides, subject to certain 

conditions, for an environmental 

assessment (audit) ‘‘privilege’’ for 

voluntary compliance evaluations 

performed by a regulated entity. The 

legislation further addresses the relative 

burden of proof for parties either 

asserting the privilege or seeking 

disclosure of documents for which the 

privilege is claimed. Virginia’s 

legislation also provides, subject to 

certain conditions, for a penalty waiver 

for violations of environmental laws 

when a regulated entity discovers such 

violations pursuant to a voluntary 

compliance evaluation and voluntarily 

discloses such violations to the 

Commonwealth and takes prompt and 

appropriate measures to remedy the 

violations. Virginia’s Voluntary 

Environmental Assessment Privilege 

Law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1–1198, provides 

a privilege that protects from disclosure 

documents and information about the 

content of those documents that are the 

product of a voluntary environmental 

assessment. The Privilege Law does not 

extend to documents or information 

that: (1) Are generated or developed 

before the commencement of a 

voluntary environmental assessment; (2) 

are prepared independently of the 

assessment process; (3) demonstrate a 

clear, imminent and substantial danger 

to the public health or environment; or 

(4) are required by law. 

On January 12, 1998, the 

Commonwealth of Virginia Office of the 

Attorney General provided a legal 

opinion that states that the Privilege 

law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1–1198, precludes 

granting a privilege to documents and 

information ‘‘required by law,’’ 

including documents and information 

‘‘required by Federal law to maintain 

program delegation, authorization or 

approval,’’ since Virginia must ‘‘enforce 

Federally authorized environmental 

programs in a manner that is no less 

stringent than their Federal 

counterparts. . . .’’ The opinion 

concludes that ‘‘[r]egarding § 10.1–1198, 

therefore, documents or other 

information needed for civil or criminal 

enforcement under one of these 

programs could not be privileged 

because such documents and 

information are essential to pursuing 

enforcement in a manner required by 

Federal law to maintain program 

delegation, authorization or approval.’’ 

Virginia’s Immunity law, Va. Code 

Sec. 10.1–1199, provides that ‘‘[t]o the 

extent consistent with requirements 

imposed by Federal law,’’ any person 

making a voluntary disclosure of 

information to a state agency regarding 

a violation of an environmental statute, 

regulation, permit, or administrative 

order is granted immunity from 

administrative or civil penalty. The 

Attorney General’s January 12, 1998 

opinion states that the quoted language 

renders this statute inapplicable to 

enforcement of any Federally authorized 

programs, since ‘‘no immunity could be 

afforded from administrative, civil, or 

criminal penalties because granting 

such immunity would not be consistent 

with Federal law, which is one of the 

criteria for immunity.’’ 

Therefore, EPA has determined that 

Virginia’s Privilege and Immunity 

statutes will not preclude the 

Commonwealth from enforcing its 

program consistent with the Federal 

requirements. In any event, because 

EPA has also determined that a state 

audit privilege and immunity law can 

affect only state enforcement and cannot 

have any impact on Federal 

enforcement authorities, EPA may at 

any time invoke its authority under the 

CAA, including, for example, sections 

113, 167, 205, 211 or 213, to enforce the 

requirements or prohibitions of the state 

plan, independently of any state 

enforcement effort. In addition, citizen 

enforcement under section 304 of the 

CAA is likewise unaffected by this, or 

any, state audit privilege or immunity 

law. 

VI. Incorporation by Reference 

In this document, EPA is finalizing 

regulatory text that includes 

incorporation by reference. In 

accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 

51.5, EPA is finalizing the incorporation 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 109 / Wednesday, June 9, 2021 / Rules and Regulations 30547 

1 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997). 

by reference of the unredacted portions 

of Virginia stationary source permit to 

operate, registration number 20132, 

issued to Roanoke Electric Steel (D/B/A 

Steel Dynamics, Inc.) on December 22, 

2004, and revised on March 25, 2020. 

EPA has made, and will continue to 

make, these materials generally 

available through https://

www.regulations.gov and at the EPA 

Region III Office (please contact the 

person identified in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section of this 

preamble for more information). 

Therefore, these materials have been 

approved by EPA for inclusion in the 

SIP, have been incorporated by 

reference by EPA into that plan, are 

fully federally enforceable under 

sections 110 and 113 of the CAA as of 

the effective date of the final rulemaking 

of EPA’s approval, and will be 

incorporated by reference in the next 

update to the SIP compilation.1

VII. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

A. General Requirements 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely approves state law as meeting 

Federal requirements and does not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by state law. For that 

reason, this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, 

January 21, 2011); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

The SIP is not approved to apply on 

any Indian reservation land as defined 

in 18 U.S.C. 1151 or in any other area 

where EPA or an Indian tribe has 

demonstrated that a tribe has 

jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian 

country, the rule does not have tribal 

implications and will not impose 

substantial direct costs on tribal 

governments or preempt tribal law as 

specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 

FR 67249, November 9, 2000). 

B. Submission to Congress and the 

Comptroller General 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. Section 804, 

however, exempts from section 801 the 

following types of rules: Rules of 

particular applicability; rules relating to 

agency management or personnel; and 

rules of agency organization, procedure, 

or practice that do not substantially 

affect the rights or obligations of nonagency parties. 5 U.S.C. 804(3). Because 

this is a rule of particular applicability, 

EPA is not required to submit a rule 

report regarding this action under 

section 801. 

C. Petitions for Judicial Review 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by August 9, 2021. Filing a 

petition for reconsideration by the 

Administrator of this final rule does not 

affect the finality of this action for the 

purposes of judicial review nor does it 

extend the time within which a petition 

for judicial review may be filed, and 

shall not postpone the effectiveness of 

such rule or action. This action 

pertaining to source specific NOX limits 

at SDI may not be challenged later in 

proceedings to enforce its requirements. 

(See section 307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

Dated: May 28, 2021. 

Diana Esher, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region III. 

For the reasons stated in the 

preamble, the EPA amends 40 CFR part 

52 as follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart VV—Virginia 

■ 2. In § 52.2420, the table in paragraph 

(d) is amended by removing the entry 

‘‘Roanoke Electric Steel Corp’’ and 

adding the entry ‘‘Roanoke Electric Steel 

Corporation D/B/A Steel Dynamics, 

Inc.—Roanoke Bar Division’’ in its place 

to read as follows: 

§ 52.2420 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(d) * * * 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
30548 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 109 / Wednesday, June 9, 2021 / Rules and Regulations 

EPA—APPROVED SOURCE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS

Source name 

Permit/order 

or registration 

No. 

State 

effective 

date 

EPA approval date 40 CFR part 

52 citation 

*******

Roanoke Electric Steel Corporation D/B/A 

Steel Dynamics, Inc.—Roanoke Bar Division.

20131 3/25/20 6/9/21, [Insert Federal Register citation] ..... 52.2420(d)(7) 

*******

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2021–11923 Filed 6–8–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Bureau of Land Management 

43 CFR Parts 3160 and 9230 

[212.LLHQ310000.L13100000.PP0000] 

RIN 1004–AE77 

Onshore Oil and Gas Operations and 

Coal Trespass—Annual Civil Penalties 

Inflation Adjustments 

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This final rule adjusts the 

level of civil monetary penalties 

contained in the Bureau of Land 

Management’s (BLM) regulations 

governing onshore oil and gas 

operations and coal trespass as required 

by the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation 

Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 

2015 and consistent with applicable 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) guidance. The oil and gas 

operations penalty adjustments made by 

this final rule constitute the 2021 

annual inflation adjustments, 

accounting for 1 year of inflation 

spanning the period from October 2019 

through October 2020. The coal trespass 

inflation adjustments in this rule 

include the initial ‘‘catch-up’’ 

adjustment for 2016, and the annual 

adjustments for years 2017 to 2021. 

DATES: This rule is effective on June 9, 

2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

information regarding the BLM’s Fluid 

Minerals Program, please contact Donna 

Dixon, Division Chief, Fluid Minerals 

Division, telephone: 505–954–2032; 

email: dbdixon@blm.gov. For 

information regarding the BLM’s Solid 

Minerals Program, please contact 

Lindsey Curnutt, Division Chief, Solid 

Minerals Division, telephone: 775–824– 

2910; email: lcurnutt@blm.gov. For 

questions relating to regulatory process 

issues, please contact Jennifer Noe, 

Division of Regulatory Affairs, email: 

jnoe@blm.gov. Persons who use a 

telecommunications device for the deaf 

(TDD) may call the Federal Relay 

Service (FRS) at 1–800–877–8339, 24 

hours a day, 7 days a week to contact 

the above individuals. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

II. Calculation of 2021 Adjustments 

III. Procedural Requirements 

A. Administrative Procedure Act 

B. Regulatory Planning and Review (E.O. 

12866 and E.O. 13563) 

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act 

D. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act 

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

F. Takings (E.O. 12630) 

G. Federalism (E.O. 13132) 

H. Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988) 

I. Consultation With Indian Tribes (E.O. 

13175 and Departmental Policy) 

J. Paperwork Reduction Act 

K. National Environmental Policy Act 

L. Effects on the Energy Supply (E.O. 

13211) 

I. Background 

On November 2, 2015, the Federal 

Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act 

Improvements Act of 2015 (Sec. 701 of 

Pub. L. 114–74) (the 2015 Act) became 

law, amending the Federal Civil 

Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 

1990 (Pub. L. 101–410). 

The 2015 Act requires agencies to: 

1. Adjust the level of civil monetary 

penalties for inflation with an initial 

‘‘catch-up’’ adjustment through an 

interim final rulemaking in 2016; 

2. Make subsequent annual 

adjustments for inflation beginning in 

2017; and 

3. Report annually in Agency 

Financial Reports on these inflation 

adjustments. 

The purpose of these adjustments is to 

maintain the deterrent effect of civil 

monetary penalties and promote 

compliance with the law (see Sec. 1, 

Pub. L. 101–410). 

As required by the 2015 Act, the BLM 

issued an interim final rule that 

adjusted the level of civil monetary 

penalties in BLM regulations with the 

initial ‘‘catch-up’’ adjustment (RIN 

1004–AE46, 81 FR 41860), which was 

published on June 28, 2016, and became 

effective on July 28, 2016. On January 

19, 2017, the BLM published a final rule 

(RIN 1004–AE49, 82 FR 6305) updating 

the civil penalty amounts to the 2017 

annual adjustment levels. Final rules 

updating the civil penalty amounts to 

2018, 2019, and 2020 annual adjustment 

levels were published in subsequent 

years (RIN 1004–AE51, 83 FR 3992; RIN 

1004–AE56, 84 FR 22379; and RIN 

1004–AE77, 85 FR 10617, respectively). 

OMB issued Memorandum M–21–10 

on December 23, 2020, (Implementation 

of Penalty Inflation Adjustments for 

2021, Pursuant to the Federal Civil 

Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act 

Improvements Act of 2015) explaining 

agency responsibilities for identifying 

applicable penalties and calculating the 

annual adjustment for 2021 in 

accordance with the 2015 Act. 

II. Calculation of 2021 Adjustment 

In accordance with the 2015 Act and 

OMB Memorandum M–21–10, the BLM 

has identified applicable civil monetary 

penalties in its regulations and 

calculated the annual adjustments. A 

civil monetary penalty is any 

assessment with a dollar amount that is 

levied for a violation of a Federal civil 

statute or regulation and is assessed or 

enforceable through a civil action in 

Federal court or an administrative 

proceeding. A civil monetary penalty 

does not include a penalty levied for 

violation of a criminal statute, nor does 

it include fees for services, licenses, 

permits, or other regulatory review. The 

calculated annual inflation adjustments 

are based on the percentage change 

between the Consumer Price Index for 

all Urban Consumers (CPI–U) for the 

October preceding the date of the 

adjustment, and the prior year’s October 

CPI–U. Consistent with guidance in 

OMB Memorandum M–21–10, the BLM 

divided the October 2020 CPI–U by the 

October 2019 CPI–U to calculate the 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1