alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ralston White, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Starkey, J.), rendered April 6, 1988, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Mangano, P. J., Kunzeman, Kooper, Sullivan and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
#### Catherine I. NORTON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 1343-88.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.

May 24, 1989.

*561Travis B. Bryan, III, Bryan, for appellant.

Bill Turner, Dist. Atty., and Margaret Lalk, Asst. Dist. Atty., Bryan, Robert Hut-tash, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted by a jury for credit card abuse and sentenced to 2 years probation. The trial court imposed 20 days confinement in the county jail as a condition of probation. The conviction was reversed and the case was remanded on appeal. *Norton v. State,*755 S.W.2d 522 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st] 1988).

We have considered the issues raised and find that the Court of Appeals reached the correct result. The petition for discretionary review will be refused.

As is true in every case where this Court refuses a petition for discretionary review, this refusal does not constitute endorsement or adoption of the reasoning employed by the Court of Appeals. See *Sheffield v. State,*650 S.W.2d 813 (Tex.Cr.App.1983).

With this understanding, the State’s petition for discretionary review is refused.
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF OFFICERS


OF
BIO-BRIDGE SCIENCE, INC.


PURSUANT
TO 18 USC ss. 1350





I, Liang
Qiao, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(a) The
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 of Bio-Bridge
Science, Inc. (the "Company"), fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(b)
Information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Date:August14, 2009
                /s/ Dr. Liang
  QiaoBy:
      Dr. Liang QiaoChief
      Executive Officer




I, Chuen
Huei (Kevin) Lee, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(c) The
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 of Bio-Bridge
Science, Inc. (the "Company") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(d)
Information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Date:August14, 2009
              /s/ Chuen Huei (Kevin)
      LeeBy:
      Chuen Huei (Kevin) LeeChief
      Financial Officer andPrincipal
      Accounting Officer
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6682

Lubrication Specialties, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 103 (Tuesday, June 1, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 29262]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-11481]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals To Engage in or To Acquire Companies Engaged 
in Permissible Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y, (12 CFR part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec.  225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the question 
whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 4 of the 
BHC Act.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors, Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and 
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than July 
1, 2021.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Ivan Hurwitz, Senior Vice 
President) 33 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10045-0001. Comments 
can also be sent electronically to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#98dbf7f5f5fdf6ecebb6f9e8e8f4f1fbf9ecf1f7f6ebd8f6e1b6feeafab6f7eaff"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="52113d3f3f373c26217c3322223e3b3133263b3d3c21123c2b7c3420307c3d2035">[email protected]</span></a>:
    1. New York Community Bancorp, Inc., Westbury, New York; to acquire 
Flagstar Bancorp, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire Flagstar Bank, 
FSB, both of Troy, Michigan, and thereby engage in extending credit and 
servicing loans and operating a savings association, pursuant to 
section 225.28(b)(1) and (b)(4)(ii) of the Board's Regulation Y, 
respectively.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 26, 2021.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2021-11481 Filed 5-28-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7218

Omron Management Center of America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
exv10w13






Exhibit 10.13




CLARIFICATION DATED APRIL 27, 2010 BETWEEN IRVINE SENSORS CORPORATION AND LONGVIEW




CLARIFICATION TO

AGREEMENT, CONSENT AND WAIVER



     This Clarification (this “Clarification”) to the Agreement, Consent and Waiver by and between
the Company and Longview dated as of April 9, 2010 (the “Agreement”), is made as of April 27, 2010
by and between the Company and Longview. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have
the meaning given to them in the Agreement.



     WHEREAS, the Company entered into the Agreement and agreed to the contingent issuance of the
Contingent Securities as an inducement to obtain Longview’s consent to the Looney Settlement and
Looney Note;



     WHEREAS, the Company also agreed to issue the Waiver Securities as an inducment to obtain
Longview’s waiver of the Accumulated Dividends; and



     WHEREAS, the Parties wish to clarify (i) the value of the Contingent Securities and (ii) the
value of the Waiver Securities.



     NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties agree that (i) the value of the Contingent Securities at the time
the Parties entered into the Agreement was $0.30 per share, and (ii) the value of the Waiver
Securities at the time the Parties entered into the Agreement was $0.30 per share.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Clarification as of the date first written
above.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	IRVINE SENSORS CORPORATION

 	 
	 	By:  	/c/ John J. Stuart, Jr.
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	John J. Stuart, Jr. 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Chief Financial Officer 	 
	 
	 	LONGVIEW FUND, L.P.

 	 
	 	By:  	/c/ S. Michael Rudolph
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	S. Michael Rudolph 	 
	 	 	Title:  	CFO — Investment Adviser
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7085

Apergy ESP Systems, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
**Exhibit
      32.1**








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Triton Distribution Systems, Inc. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30, 2006 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below,
      hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
      knowledge:





(1)
            The
                report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





Dated:
                November 14, 2006
            By:/s/
                Gregoy LykiardopolousGregoy
                LykiardopolousChief
                Executive Officer
Organization Name:

Note: Representatives submitting on behalf of an organization must enter information below.

Requestor Representative:

Section 301 Investigation: China's Acts, Policies, and Practices Related to Technology 

Transfer, Intellectual Property, and Innovation - Form to Request Exclusion of Product

When submitting a product exclusion request using this form, enter the specified 

information in the following fields and explain the basis and rationale for your statements. 

By completing this form, you certify that the information provided is complete and 

correct to the best of your knowledge. 

1. Indicate whether the comment contains business confidential information (BCI), is a public

document, or is a public version of a BCI document.

3.

2. Please provide a complete and detailed description of the product of concern:

4.

5. Requestor's relationship to the product:

CONTINUED BELOW

*

10-digit HTSUS item number* for product you wish to address in this product exclusion request:

Use numerical characters only with no special characters (example: 1023456789). For help in finding 

the HTSUS item number associated with your product, see https://hts.usitc.gov/

1

7.

6. Does this submission in regulations.gov include additional attachments?

Please indicate whether any additional attachment contains business confidential

information (BCI), is a public document, or is a public version of a BCI document.

VERSION 1

Requestor Information

Requestor Name (Last, First):

Public Version of BCI

RC7513, 79.5 ton Capacity, 13.13 in Stroke, General Purpose Hydraulic Cylinder; Maximum Operating 

Pressure psi: 10000; Weight Kgs: 59,0; Oil Capacity Advance cm3: 3417; Stroke Ranges mm: 290 - 

379

8412210075 Schmidt, Jackie Enerpac Jackie SchmidtImporter Yes Contains BCI
END 2

8. Is this product, or a comparable product, available from sources in the United States?:

VERSION 1

11. Please provide information in support your request, taking account of the instructions

provided in Section B of the Federal Register notice (note: text entered below can extend

beyond the apparent size of this box).

9. Is this product, or a comparable product, available from sources in third countries?:

10. Please provide the value and quantity (with units) of the Chinese-origin product of concern

that you purchased for each calendar year specified. Limit this figure to the products

purchased by your firm (or by members of your trade association) alone. Please provide 

estimates if precise figures are unavailable.

2016 Value:

2015 Value:

2017 Value:

2016 Quantity:

2015 Quantity:

2017 Quantity:

No No BCI BCI BCI BCI BCI BCI

See addendum for additional information.
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 2- 17 99

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Mat th ew Je well

ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el la nt

v.
Mi ll er Co un ty, Ark an sa s; Lin da Ram bo , For m er Sh eri ff

ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an ts - App el le es

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Weste rn Dis tri ct of Ark an sa s - Tex ark an a

__ __ __ __ __ __ Su bm it te d: Sep te m

be r 18 , 20 12 Fi le d: Octo be r 15 , 20 12 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re WOL LMAN, MELLOY, and SHEPHERD, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

Ark an sa s in m at e Mat th ew Je well ap pe al s fo ll owi ng th e di st ric t co ur t’s en try 1 of fin al jud gm en t in hi s 42 U.S.C. § 19 83 act io n, in whi ch he rai se d a fai lu re-t oThe Hon or ab le Barr y A. Bryant , Uni te d St at es Mag is tra te Ju dg e fo r th e 1 W es te rn Dis tri ct of Ark an sa s, to who m th e cas e was refe rred fo r fin al di sp os it io n by
co ns en t o f th e p art ie s p ur su an t t o 2 8 U.S.C. § 63 6( c).pr ot ect cl ai m

. Afte r care fu l rev ie w, we ag ree wit h th e di st ric t co ur t th at Je well fai le d

to st at e an of

fic ia l-c ap aci ty cl ai m ag ai ns t Lin da Ram bo or a m un ic ip al -li ab il it y cl ai m ag a i ns t Mi ll er Co un ty, as no th in g in Je well ’s co m pl ai nt de m on st rat ed th at a

m un ic ip al po li cy or cu st om cau se d hi s in juri es

. See L.A. Cn ty. v. Hum ph rie s, 13 1 S. Ct

. 4 47 , 4 49 , 4 52 -5 3 (2 01 0) (m un ic ip al it y is li ab le un de r § 19 83 on ly i f in jury was

cau se d pu rs ua nt to it s po li cy or cu st om ); Crawf or d v. Van Bu ren Cn ty., 67 8 F.3 d 66 6, 66 9 (8 th Ci r. 20 12 ) (o ffi ci al -cap aci ty su it ag ai ns t go ve rn m en t of fic er is eq ui va le nt to

su it ag ai ns t em

pl oyin g go ve rn m en ta l en ti ty). W e al so co nc lu de th at th e di st ric t co ur t pr op erl y gr an te d su m

m ary jud gm en t as to th e in di vi du al -cap ac it y cl ai m ag ai ns t Ram bo , b ecau se th e reco rd be fo re th e co ur t di d no t rev eal an y t r i a l w o r th y is su e on whe th er Ram

bo kn e w of bu t di sr eg ard ed a su bs ta nt ia l ris k th at Je well wou ld be

as sa ul te d by ot he r in m at es at th e jail

. See Farm er v. Bren na n, 51 1 U.S. 82 5, 83 4, 84 7 (1 99 4) (Eig ht h Am en dm en t fai lu re-t o- pr ot ect cl ai m req ui res th at in m at e was un de r
co nd it i on s po si ng su bs ta nt ia l ris k of se rio us ha rm , an d th at de fen da nt kn ew of bu t de li be rat el y di sr eg ard ed ris k)

. Fi na ll y , we co nc l u d e th at th e di st ric t co ur t di d no t ab us e it s di sc ret io n in de nyin g Je w e l l ’s mo ti on fo r ap po in tm en t of co un se l. See Pl um m er v . Grim es , 87 F.3d 10 32 , 10 33 (8t h C ir. 1 99 6) (st an da rd of r ev ie w).

Acco rd in gl y , we affi rm . See 8 th Cir . R. 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6230

CW Bearing USA, Inc: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions.

pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5671

Fluor Enterprises, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel