alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 72 (Friday, April 14, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 19012]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9220]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 95-37, RM-8586]


Television Broadcasting Services; Waimanalo, HI

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document requests comments on a petition by Joyce 
Cathcart, proposing the allotment of Television Channel 56 to 
Waimanalo, Hawaii, as that community's first local television service. 
The allotment can be made consistent with the minimum distance 
separation requirements of Section 73.610 of the Commission's Rules. 
The coordinates for the proposed allotment of Channel 56 to Waimanalo 
are 21-21-00 and 157-43-12. This proposal is not affected by the freeze 
on television allotments or applications.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before June 1, 1995, and reply 
comments on or before June 16, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, D.C. 20554. 
In addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should 
serve the petitioner, or its counsel or consultant, as follows: Joyce 
Cathcart, 1508 Halekoa Drive, Ainakoa, Hawaii (Petitioner).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy J. Walls, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 95-37, adopted March 28, 
1995, and released April 10, 1995. The full text of this Commission 
decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business 
hours in the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW, 
Washington, D.C. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, International 
Transcription Service, (202) 857-3800, 1919 M Street, NW, Room 246, or 
2100 M Street, NW, Suite 140, Washington, D.C. 20037.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of l980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.204(b) for rules governing permissible 
ex parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Television broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 95-9220 Filed 4-13-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

SANDRA TRUJILLO NORTH and PHILIP DOUGLAS NORTH,

Appellant,

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,

Appellee.

No. 4D16-1960

[October 11, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Peter D. Blanc, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

2012CA00912XXXMB.

Kenzie N. Sadlak of Kenzie N. Sadlak, PA, Miami, for appellant.

Michele L. Stocker of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, and 

Kimberly S. Mello, Laura J. Bassini, and Joseph Picone of Greenberg

Traurig, P.A., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 

1150 (Fla. 1979).

DAMOORGIAN, CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
PUBLIC VERSION
$[*********] [******]

$[*********]

INPUT

20.0

$[*********]

[******]

[******]

0.05

PUBLIC VERSION
Consistent with USTR's Section 301 notice, OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. requests

confidential treatment for the information designated as business confidential in this submission. Such

information consists of information that would not customarily be released to the public, including

business or trade secrets regarding production costs and processes, data on sales, product characteristics

customers, destinations, and other product, sales, and cost-related business secrets. Business confidential

information has been indicated herein by enclosing it in single brackets (“[ ]”). A public version of these

comments is also being filed with all confidential information removed.

OMRON in the US is the only designer of this product and only supplier of this component. OMRON in

the US is the only designer of this product and only supplier of this component.

AT SHIFTER SWITCH is a molded plastic switch containing an electrical switch, and is used only for

automotive purposes as a switch to change the gear into transmission up and down. It is only used for

further assembly of components which go into domestic automobile production. which is specified by the

auto manufacturer.

This product is not a target of the US Administration's 301 investigation regarding Intellectual Property

concerns. This is not a concern to IP transfer and impressment. This product contains no IP of interest

related to autonomous vehicle production.

The tariff action ultimately poses a risk of significant damage to OMRON, the domestic automobile

industry, and ultimately the US consumer as an increase in price. Like in the case of similar approvals for

vehicle components at the HTS level, OMRON views this product in the same manner. Immediate

movement of production to a US manufacturer or another country would pose significant re-tooling

costs, significant amounts of time, and approvals pertaining to consumer automobile safety standards are

costly and would take a significant amount of time to obtain.

OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. believes that CBP can easily exclude the AT SHIFTER

SWITCH in question based solely on the product description. The following are draft CBP exclusion

instructions:

"AT SHIFTER SWITCH rectangular base assembly with a "J" shaped switch housing molded to the top

running parallel to the base; circular connector at the center of the base and a rectangular connector on

the edge extending at appx 45 degree angle from the face of the base. Made of Metal, Plastic, Rubber,

One Damper - Made of rubber . Handle dimensions: 87.8 mm X 53.4mm X 24.9mm Housing

dimensions: 55.33mm X 44.29 mm X 30.48 mm"

This information will be contained on the invoice from the supplier

PUBLIC VERSION
| (i)    |   | the accompanying Annual Report on      Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2009      (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,      as amended; and |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
| (ii)   |   | the information contained in the      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition      and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods      presented in such Report.                                                                                      |

|   | /s/ William R.      Neil                                                                                                                                |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | William  R,      Neil                                                                                                                                   |   |
|   | Chief Financial Officer and Acting      Chief Executive Officer(Principal Financial and      Accounting Officer and Acting Principal Executive      Officer) |

----
DISMISS and Opinion Filed May 27, 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 21

- 00347

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.B.K., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 470th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 470

- 56492

- 2020

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Osborne, Pedersen, III, and Nowell

Opinion by Justice Osborne Before the Court is appellant’s motion to dismiss this restricted appeal. We

grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.

210347f.p05 /Leslie Osborne//
LESLIE OSBORNE JUSTICE– 2

– 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

IN THE INTEREST OF A.B.K., A CHILD

No. 05

- 21

- 00347

- CV On Appeal from the 470th Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 470

- 56492

- 2020. Opinion delivered by Justice Osborne. Justices Pedersen, III and Nowell participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

.

It is ORDERED that appellee the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services recover its costs of this appeal from appellant James Edward Moya, Jr.

Judgment entered thi s 27 th day of May, 2021.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Accentia Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
Company) for the nine months ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Alan M. Pearce, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The form 10-Q fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended: and

(2) The information contained in the Form
10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 14, 2006



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Alan M. Pearce     
|Alan M. Pearce         
|Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Accentia Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the
date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

End of Filing



49
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of JayHawk Energy, Inc. a Colorado corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Lindsay E. Gorrill, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to JayHawk Energy, Inc., and will be retained by JayHawk Energy, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




/s/ Lindsay GorrillLindsay GorrillChief Executive OfficerAugust 11, 2010
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Station Casinos, Inc.Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)**

Pursuant to therequirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.Sections 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certify as follows:

1.                 Frank J. FertittaIII is the Chief Executive Officer of the Company (the “Company”).

2.                 The undersignedcertifies to the best of his knowledge:

(A)      The Company’s Form 10-K/Afor the year ended December 31, 2006 accompanying this Certification, inthe form filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”); and

(B)       The information in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

Dated:  April 26,2007
|        | /s/ Frank J. Fertitta III |
|--------|---------------------------|
|   | Frank J. Fertitta III     |
|   | Chairman of the Board and |
|   | Chief Executive Officer   |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information primarily extracted from
AT&T Capital Corporation's audited consolidated income statement and balance
sheet for and at the year ended December 31, 1997 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>             1000

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                   0
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                      (178,552)
<INVENTORY>                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         0<F2>
<PP&E>                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                    (772,437)<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   8,775,895
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    0<F2>
<BONDS>                          5,249,409
<COMMON>                               903
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<OTHER-SE>                         742,876
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     8,775,895<F3>
<SALES>                             49,349
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 1,814,139
<CGS>                               44,769
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      598,828
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   114,301
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 451,470
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     32,036
<INCOME-TAX>                        11,029
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 21,007
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                        21,007
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0


<FN>
* In accordance with Regulation S-K item 601(c) 2, inapplicable or immaterial
financial data is reflected as zero value.

<F1> - Accumulated depreciation relates to equipment under operating leases.

<F2> - This item is not applicable since the Company does not prepare a
       classified balance sheet.

<F3> - Includes Company-obligated preferred securities of $200,000.
</FN>
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit 

No. 18-1704 

JOSEPH O'BRIEN, 

Plaintiff, Appellant, 

v. 

TOWN OF BELLINGHAM, Commonwealth of Massachusetts; 

RICHARD PERRY, individually and in his official capacity 

as a police officer; TIMOTHY JOYCE, individually and in his 

official capacity as a police officer; JAMES RUSSELL, 

individually and in his official capacity as a police officer; 

BRIAN KUTCHER, individually and in his official capacity 

as a police officer; JOHN MELANSON, individually and in his 

official capacity as a police officer, 

Defendants, Appellees, 

ERIC ZIMMERMAN, individually and in his official capacity 

as a police officer; MICHAEL GILBOY, individually and in his 

official capacity as a police officer, 

Defendants. 

ERRATA SHEET 

The opinion of this Court, issued on November 22, 2019, is 

amended as follows: 

On page 11, lines 5-6, please replace "Almost forty minutes 

after arriving at the Police Station," with "Almost forty minutes 

after O'Brien arrived at the Police Station,".
**EXHIBIT 32.01**

**Section 1350 Certification**

In connection with thisannual report of ML Aspect FuturesAccess LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-K forthe year ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (this “Report”), I, Robert D. Ollwerther, Chief ExecutiveOfficer and President of Merrill Lynch Alternative Investments LLC, the managerof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 14,2007
| By                                    | /s/ Robert D. Ollwerther |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------------------------|--------|
| Robert D. Ollwerther                  |
| Chief Executive Officer and President |
| (Principal Executive Officer)         |

 

----
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7321

Industrial Belting & Transmission:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Robert A. Schriesheim, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Sears Holdings Corporation; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 18, 2011                                                                              
|                                                                                                     
|/s/ Robert A. Schriesheim                                                                            
|Robert A. Schriesheim
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Sears Holdings Corporation
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ANDRE ZOLDAN,

Appellant,

v.

THE ENTRADA CONDOMINIUM, INC.,

Appellee.

No. 4D12-3179

[June 24, 2015]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Mily Rodriguez Powell and William W. Haury, Jr., 

Judges; L.T. Case No. CACE 09-46887 (13).

Kenzie N. Sadlak of Kenzie N. Sadlak, P.A., Miami, for appellant.

William M. Douberley of Douberley, McGuinness & Cicero, Sunrise, for 

appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Central Mortg. Co. v. Callahan, 155 So. 3d 373, 375-76

(Fla. 3d DCA 2014); Ross v. Wells Fargo Bank, 114 So. 3d 256, 257 (Fla. 

3d DCA 2013).

STEVENSON, GROSS and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### William MEYER, Plaintiff/Respondent/Cross-Appellant, v. Monica BIBLE, Defendant/ Appellant/Cross-Respondent.

Nos. 63094, 63119.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

Nov. 30, 1993.

Jerome Wallach, Michael F. Dandino, The Wallach Law Firm, St. Louis, for appellant.

Cynthia S. Holmes, Clayton, for respondent.

Before CRANE, P.J., and KAROHL and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

This is a consolidated appeal from the trial court’s judgments on the parties’ respective petition and counterclaim in which they charged each other with conversion of personal property taken from the apartment the parties had shared. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. *Murphy v. Carron,*536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).