19590 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 75 / Wednesday, April 19, 1995 / Notices

Document Title NTIS Accession No. EPA Document No. Hardcopy Price

Hazard Evaluation

Series 71-5 PB83–153908 540/09–82–024 $19.50

Series 72-7 PB83–153908 540/09–82–024 $19.50

Addendum No. 2 Data Reporting Guideline for Soil and

Water Methods to Support Hazard Evaluation Studies

Subdivision K:

Reentry Protection

Series 132–1b PB85–120962 540/09–84–001 $19.50

The Data Reporting Guideline for Soil and Water Methods

will be attached to the new Reentry Protection Guideline.

Subdivision N:

Environmental Fate

Series 164-1 B83–153973 540/09–82–021 $27.00

Series 164-2 B83–153973 540/09–82–021 $27.00

Series 164-3 B83–153973 540/09–82–021 $27.00

Series 164-5 B83–153973 540/09–82–021 $27.00

Series 165-3 B83–153973 540/09–82–021 $27.00

Series 166-1—Guidance to be issued by EPA in the

near future.

Addendum No 9. Data Reporting Guideline for Soil and

Water Methods to Support Environmental Fate Studies

Orders may be placed by mail or

telephone. All orders should specify

whether the document is requested in

hardcopy or microfiche form since

prices vary for hardcopy but they will

cost $9.00 for microfiche. There is an

additional $4.00 to $8.00 handling

charge for each order, depending on the

total cost of the order. Payment may be

made by using an existing NTIS deposit

account; charging to VISA, Mastercard,

American Express or check or money

order. The order should cite the

document title, NTIS ordering number

for the document, kind of document

(microfiche or hardcopy), and the price.

List of Subjects

Environmental protection.

Dated: April 7, 1995.

Allen L. Jennings,

Director, Biological and Economic Analysis

Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.

[FR Doc. 95–9535 Filed 4–18–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–F

Office of Pollution Prevention and

Toxics

[OPPTS–44616; FRL–4949–7]

TSCA Chemical Testing; Receipt of

Test Data

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: This notice announces the

receipt of test data on 1,3,5-

trimethylbenzene (CAS No. 108–67–8),

submitted pursuant to a final test rule

under the Toxic Substances Control Act

(TSCA). Publication of this notice is in

compliance with section 4(d) of TSCA.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

James Willis, Acting Director,

Environmental Assistance Division

(7408), Office of Pollution Prevention

and Toxics, Environmental Protection

Agency, Rm. E–543B, 401 M St., SW.,

Washington, DC 20460, (202) 554–1404,

TDD (202) 554–0551.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section

4(d) of TSCA requires EPA to publish a

notice in the Federal Register reporting

the receipt of test data submitted

pursuant to test rules promulgated

under section 4(a) within 15 days after

it is received.

I. Test Data Submissions

Test data for 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene

were submitted by Koch Industries, Inc.,

pursuant to a test rule at 40 CFR

799.5075. They were received by EPA

on February 9, 1995. The submission

describes a 14-day oral gavage toxicity

study in rats with a recovery group. This

chemical is used as an intermediate in

the production of an antioxidant for

plastics.

EPA has initiated its review and

evaluation process for these data

submissions. At this time, the Agency is

unable to provide any determination as

to the completeness of the submissions.

II. Public Record

EPA has established a public record

for this TSCA section 4(d) receipt of

data notice (docket number OPPTS–

44616). This record includes copies of

all studies reported in this notice. The

record is available for inspection from

12 noon to 4 p.m., Monday through

Friday, except legal holidays, in the

TSCA Public Docket Office, Rm. B–607

Northeast Mall, 401 M Street SW.,

Washington, DC 20460.

Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2603.

List of Subjects

Environmental protection, Test data.

Dated: April 10, 1995.

Charles M. Auer,

Director, Chemical Control Division, Office

of Pollution Prevention and Toxics.

[FR Doc. 95–9662 Filed 4–18–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–U

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

[WT Docket No. 95–35; DA 95–705]

Designation of Amateur License

Renewal Application for Hearing

AGENCY: Federal Communications

Commission.

ACTION: Hearing designation order.

SUMMARY: This Order designates the

application of George E. Rodgers to

renew his amateur radio station license

(N3LR) and his Amateur Extra Class

operator license for hearing on the basis

of a criminal conviction.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Thomas D.

Fitz-Gibbon, Enforcement Division,

Wireless Telecommunications Bureau,

Federal Communications Commission,

Washington, D.C. 20554; or telephone

(202) 418–0693.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 1. This is

a summary of the Order adopted March
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 75 / Wednesday, April 19, 1995 / Notices 19591

1This includes video dialtone trials and

commercial applications.

2LECs with annual operating revenues of $100

million or more are required to file a CAM with the

Commission. CAMs contain information regarding

the carriers’ allocation of costs between regulated

and nonregulated activities. See 47 C.F.R. § 64.903.

3See Telephone Company-Cable Television

Cross-Ownership Rules, Section 63.54–63.58,

Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, First

Report and Order and Second Further Notice of

Inquiry, 56 FR 65464 (Dec. 17, 1991) (First Report

and Order), recon., 7 FCC Rcd 5069 (1992), aff’d,

National Cable Television Association v FCC, No.

91–1649 (D.C. Cir. Aug. 26, 1994) (NCTA v. FCC);

Telephone Company-Cable Television CrossOwnership Rules, Sections 63.54–63.58, Second

Report and Order, Recommendation to Congress,

and Second Further Notice of Proposed

Rulemaking, 57 FR 41106 (Sep. 9, 1992) (Second

Report and Order), aff’d, Memorandum Opinion

and Order on Reconsideration and Third Further

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 59 FR 63909 (Dec.

12, 1994) (‘‘VDT Recon Order’’), appeal pending

sub nom. Mankato Citizens Telephone Company v.

FCC, No. 92–1404 (D.C. Cir. filed September 9,

1992).

4Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984, Pub.

L. No. 98–549, § 613(b), 98 Stat. 2779 (codified at

47 U.S.C. § 533(b)).

5 VDT Recon Order at para. 173.

6By ‘‘other services’’ we mean telephone and

other services provided by LECs.

7 In this Responsible Accounting Officer (‘‘RAO’’)

Letter, we only address the accounting

classifications, format and content requirements for

LEC subsidiary records and CAM filing

requirements. We plan to address the format and

content for LEC video dialtone quarterly reports in

a separate notice and comment proceeding.

8 VDT Recon Order at para. 173.

9 47 C.F.R. § 32.11

31, 1995, and released April 12, 1995.

The complete text of this Order may be

purchased from the Commission’s copy

contractor, International Transcription

Service, (202) 857–3800, 2100 M Street,

N.W., Suite 140, Washington, D.C.

20037.

2. The Order asserted that Mr. George

E. Rodgers has applied for renewal of

his amateur service station and operator

licenses.

3. The Order asserted further that, in

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v.

Rodgers, Docket No. 2300–93 (Court of

Common Pleas, Chester County, Pa.),

Mr. Rodgers was convicted upon four

counts of violating Section 6301(a)

[corruption of minors] of the

Pennsylvania Criminal Code and upon

four counts of violating Section

3126(a)(1) [indecent assault] of the

Pennsylvania Criminal Code.

4. The Order alleged that, in view of

the criminal convictions described

above, Mr. Rodgers apparently lacks the

requisite qualifications for a renewal of

his amateur service licenses.

5. The Order designated Mr. Rodger’s

application for hearing before an

Administrative Law Judge and at a time

and location to be determined by the

order of the Chief Administrative Law

Judge upon the following issues:

(a) To determine whether, in light of

the facts determined in Commonwealth

of Pennsylvania v. Rodgers, supra,

George E. Rodgers is qualified to renew

his amateur service licenses.

(b) To determine, in light of the

foregoing issue, whether granting

George E. Rodger’s application would

serve the public interest, convenience

and necessity.

6. The Order placed the burden on

proceeding with the introduction of

evidence and the burden of proof upon

the respondent as to all issues.

Federal Communications Commission.

Howard Davenport,

Chief, Enforcement Division.

[FR Doc. 95–9633 Filed 4–18–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712–01–M

Accounting and Reporting

Requirements for Video Dialtone

Service

In Reply Refer To: RAO Letter 25, DA

95–703.

Adopted: March 31, 1995.

Released: April 3, 1995.

Responsible Accounting Officer:

Re: Accounting and Reporting Requirements

for Video Dialtone Service

I. Introduction

This letter provides guidance on

video dialtone accounting to local

exchange carriers (‘‘LECs’’) that receive

Section 214 authorizations to provide

video dialtone service.1 It sets forth

specific guidance on the requirements

for accounting classifications,

subsidiary records, and amendments to

cost allocation manuals (‘‘CAMs’’) for

LECs that provide video dialtone

service.2

II. Background

In 1991 and 1992, the Commission

adopted policies and rules to permit

LECs to assume an expanded role in the

provision of video services in their

telephone service areas.3 In its 1991 and

1992 Orders, the Commission

established a regulatory framework for

telephone companies to provide video

service on a common carrier basis and

provide various related nonregulated

services consistent with the crossownership restrictions imposed by the

Cable Communications Policy Act of

1984 (‘‘1984 Cable Act’’).4 This

regulatory framework is called ‘‘video

dialtone.’’

On November 7, 1994, the

Commission issued the Video Dialtone

Reconsideration Order (‘‘VDT Recon

Order’’). In that Order, the Commission

reaffirmed its basic video dialtone

framework adopted in the Second

Report and Order, and, among other

things, set forth accounting and

reporting requirements for LECs that

offer video dialtone service. The

Commission required carriers offering

video dialtone to establish two sets of

subsidiary accounting records: one to

capture the investment, expense and

revenue wholly dedicated to video

dialtone; the other to capture the

investment, expense and revenue shared

between video dialtone and other

services. 5 Wholly dedicated refers to

investment, expense and revenue

related exclusively to providing video

dialtone service. Shared refers to

investment, expense and revenue

related to providing video dialtone and

other services on a joint or common

basis.6

The VDT Recon Order requires LECs

to file a summary of these subsidiary

accounting records with the

Commission on a quarterly basis. The

Commission delegated authority to the

Common Carrier Bureau to define the

content and format of both the

subsidiary accounting records and the

quarterly reports, and to provide

accounting guidance where necessary

for uniform classification of video

dialtone investment, expense and

revenue.7 Finally, the VDT Recon Order

required LECs to file revisions to their

CAMs to reflect the provision of video

dialtone service.

III. Accounting Classification

The Commission did not change its

Part 32, Uniform System of Accounts for

Telecommunications Companies

(‘‘USOA’’) in the VDT Recon Order, but

it did require carriers to establish

subsidiary accounting records,

consistent with that system, in order to

isolate video dialtone costs and

revenues from other LEC costs and

revenues.8 We therefore require LECs to

maintain in subsidiary records, by

USOA accounts, all wholly dedicated

and shared investment, expense, and

revenue related to providing video

dialtone service. Finally, consistent

with Part 32 of the Commission’s rules,

Class A companies shall use Class A

detail level accounts and Class B

companies shall use Class B detail level

accounts in recording video dialtone

investment, expense and revenue in

subsidiary records.9

A. Investment Classifications

For accounting classification

purposes, video dialtone investment

shall include all plant wholly dedicated

to video dialtone or shared between

video dialtone and other services.

Wholly dedicated investment is defined