alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-5386

Robert Bosch Tool:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.01
                                 THE 3DO COMPANY
                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of Directors
The 3DO Company:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
33-71620, 33-80872, 33-84250, 33-84248, 33-96560, 33-96562, 333-20877,
333-42739, 333-42737, 333-66799 and 333-66801) on Form S-8 and the
registration statement (No. 333-80309) on Form S-3 of The 3DO Company of our
report dated May 4, 1999 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of The
3DO Company and subsidiaries as of March 31, 1998 and 1999, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows
for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 1999, which
report appears in the March 31, 1999 annual report on Form 10-K of The 3DO
Company.


Mountain View, California
June 11, 1999
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly report of Petramerica Oil, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gregory
Lykiardopoulos, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


                                          /s/ Gregory Lykiardopoulos
                                          --------------------------
                                          Gregory Lykiardopoulos
                                          Chief Executive Officer




<PAGE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7590

SGRE, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FSP Galleria North Corp.
(the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, George J. Carter, President and principal executive officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


Date: November 13, 2006                   /s/ George J. Carter
                                          ---------------------------
                                          George J. Carter
                                          President
                                          (Principal Executive Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 79 (Tuesday, April 23, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 17954]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10064]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION -

Board Conference; Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME & DATES: 10:00 a.m., April 30, 1996.

PLACE: Hearing Room A, Surface Transportation Board, 1201 Constitution 
Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20423.

STATUS: The Board will meet to discuss among themselves the following 
agenda items. Although the conference is open for the public 
observation, no public participation is permitted.

MATTERS TO BE DISCUSSED:

    STB Ex Parte No. 528, Disclosure, Publication, and Notice of 
Change of Rates and Other Service Terms for Rail Common Carriage.
    Ex Parte No. 392 (Sub-No. 2), Class Exemption for the 
Construction of Connection Track Under 49 U.S.C. 10901 and Ex Parte 
No. 392 (Sub-No. 3), Class Exemption for Rail Construction Under 49 
U.S.C. 10901.
    Finance Docket No. 32830, Alameda Corridor Construction 
Application.
    STB Finance Docket No. 32858, Illinois Central Corporation and 
Illinois Central Railroad Company--Control--CCP Holdings, Inc., 
Chicago, Central & Pacific Railroad Company and Cedar River Railroad 
Company.
    No. MC-F-20783, Capitol Bus Company-Pooling-Greyhound Lines, 
Inc.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Dennis Watson, Office of 
Congressional and Press Service, Telephone: (202) 927-5350, TDD: (202) 
927-5721.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-10064 Filed 4-19-96; 2:53 pm]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION




OF




CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER




AND




CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER





PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I,
Richard Man Fai Lee, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of China Premium Lifestyle Enterprise, Inc. for the quarter ended September
30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of China Premium Lifestyle Enterprise,
Inc.




I, Joseph
Tik Tung Wong, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of China Premium Lifestyle Enterprise, Inc. for the quarter ended September
30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of China Premium Lifestyle Enterprise,
Inc.





November
      13, 2009
                  By:
                  /s/ Richard Man Fai LeeRichard
      Man Fai LeeChief
      Executive OfficerNovember
      13, 2009
                  By:
                  /s/ Joseph Tik Tung WongJoseph
      Tik Tung WongChief
      Financial Officer and
Treasurer




This
certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated
by reference into any filing of China Premium Lifestyle Enterprise, Inc. under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q),
irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such
filing.
**EXHIBIT 31.01**

 

**Rule13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications**

 

I,Robert M. Alderman, certify that:

 

1. Ihave reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of ML Winton FuturesAccess LLC;

 

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; and

 

b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation;

 

c)  Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

b) Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date: May 15, 2006                              |
|-------------------------------------------------|
|                                            |
| By                                              | /s/  ROBERT M. ALDERMAN |   |
| Robert  M. Alderman                             |
| Chief  Executive Officer, President and Manager |
| **(Principal Executive Officer)**               |

 

----
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Juma Technology, Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony M.
Servidio, the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Anthony M.
  ServidioAnthony
      M. Servidio
                  Chief
      Executive Officer and
                  Chairman




May 13,
2009
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 77 (Friday, April 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 19964]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9887]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

Visual Arts Advisory Panel; Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting of 
the Visual Arts Advisory Panel (Painting Fellowships Section) to the 
National Council on the Arts will be held on May 15-19, 1995. The panel 
will meet from 9 a.m. to 8 p.m. on May 15-18 and from 9:30 a.m. to 5 
p.m. on May 19 in room 716, at the Nancy Hanks Center, 1100 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20506.
    A portion of this meeting will be open to the public from 3:30 p.m. 
to 5:00 p.m. on May 19 for a policy and guidelines discussion.
    The remaining portions of this meeting from 9 a.m. to 8 p.m. on May 
15-18 and from 9:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. on May 19 are for the purpose of 
panel review, discussion, evaluation, and recommendation on 
applications for financial assistance under the National Foundation on 
the Arts and the Humanities Act of 1965, as amended, including 
information given in confidence to the agency by grant applicants. In 
accordance with the determination of the Chairman of February 8, 1994, 
these sessions will be closed to the public pursuant to subsection 
(c)(4), (6) and 9(B) of section 552b of Title 5, United States Code.
    Any person may observe meetings, or portions thereof, of advisory 
panels which are open to the public, and may be permitted to 
participate in the panel's discussions at the discretion of the Panel 
chairman and with the approval of the full-time Federal employee in 
attendance.
    If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please 
contact the Office of Special Constituencies, National Endowment for 
the Arts, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20506, 202/682-
5532, TYY 202/682-5946, at least seven (7) days prior to the meeting.
    Further information with reference to this meeting can be obtained 
from Ms. Yvonne M. Sabine, Committee Management Officer, National 
Endowment for the Arts, Washington, DC, 20506, or call 202/682-5433.

    Dated: April 13, 1995.
Yvonne M. Sabine,
Director, Office of Council and Panel Operations, National Endowment 
for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 95-9887 Filed 4-20-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-M
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limit ed circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

_________________

No. 98-40691

Summary Calendar

_________________

RODNEY LEE WOODS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

J. JOHNNY GONZALES ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. G-96-CV-399

March 16, 1999

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Rodney Lee Woods, Texas state prisoner # 627825, appeals from the district court’s dismissal

without prejudice of his civil rights complaint for failure to obey a court order. A district court may

sua sponte dismiss an action for failure to prosecute or to comply with any court order. S ee FED.

R. CIV. P. 41(b); M

cCullough v. Lynaugh, 835 F.2d 1126, 1127 (5 th Cir. 1988). A sua s ponte

dismissal by the district court is reviewed for abuse of discretion. S ee McCullough

, 835 F.2d at 1127.

Because of the operati on of t he st at ute of limitations, the dismissal would operate as a

dismissal with prejudice of some of Woods’ claims. S ee Long v. Simmons, 77 F.3d 878, 880 (5 th Cir.

1996). A dismissal with prejudice “is such a severe sanction that it is t o be used only in extreme-2-

circumstances . . . In the past, we have found that lesser sanctions would suffice in all but the most

flagrant circumstances.” Burden v. Yates

, 644 F.2d 503, 505 (5 th Cir. Unit B May 1981). Although

dismissal with prejudice is a discretionary matter, we have “ generally permitted it only in the face of

a clear record of delay or contumacious conduct by the plaintiff.” C olle v. Brazos County, Tex., 981

F.2d 237, 243 (5 th Cir. 1993). Because there is no clear record of delay or contumacious conduct

by Woods, and because the district court did not employ lesser sanctions before dismissing the action,

the district court abused its discretion in dismissing the complaint. See id.

VACATED AND REMANDED.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7532

BYD Motors, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
1

The Honorable John F. Forster, Jr., United States Magistrate

Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was

referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

___________

No. 95-1773

___________

Bertha J. Washington, *

 *

Appellant, *

 * Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

 * Eastern District of Arkansas.

Veterans Administration, *

Secretary, * [UNPUBLISHED]

 *

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: February 5, 1996

 Filed: February 16, 1996 ___________

Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. ___________

PER CURIAM.

Bertha J. Washington appeals the district court's1 judgment

for defendant following a bench trial in her action under Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. Having

carefully reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude

that no error of law or fact appears and that an opinion would lack

precedential value.

 Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William C. Mooney, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 1.)

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress the statement that he made to the police in Waukegan, Illinois. That statement, made after defendant said that he would make no statement without the presence of an attorney, was not the result of police questioning or its equivalent. The single remark that the police made to defendant did not constitute conduct which the police could reasonably have anticipated would evoke a declaration from defendant concerning a crime in which he had participated. When defendant first mentioned that he had knowledge of a more serious crime than the one for which he was arrested, the police had no reason to believe that defendant was involved in that crime, but had reason to believe only that he might be willing to reveal information that he had heard from others. Moreover, the error, if any, in admitting defendant’s statement at trial was harmless in view of the other overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt *(see, People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230). (Appeal from judgment of Oneida County Court, Darrigrand, J.—murder, second degree.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Green and Davis, JJ.