alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of China Health Industries Holdings, Inc. a
Delaware corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the “Report”), I, Xin Sun , Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350), that to my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Xin SunXin
      SunChief
      Executive OfficerDate:  November
      12, 2010
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Clyde TOLLIVER, Appellant. Clyde TOLLIVER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. 64862, 66329.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

March 14, 1995.

Talat M. Bashir, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Becky Owenson Kilpatrick, Asst. Atty. Gen., *Jefferson*City, *for*respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., GRIMM, C.J., and CRAHAN, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals following his conviction by a jury of two counts of abuse of a child, § 568.060 RSMo Cum.Supp.1993. Defendant was sentenced to seven years imprisonment on each count to be served concurrently. Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Defendant, however, has abandoned that appeal by failing to brief any errors pertaining to the denial of post-conviction relief.

All of the points raised in Defendant’s direct appeal pertain to evidentiary rulings by the trial court. We find no abuse of discretion or plain error. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-6539

Nissan North America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6788

Omron Management Center of America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      15,711,932
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 21,048,140
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      19,547,433
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        19,597,000
<LOANS>                                    250,926,023
<ALLOWANCE>                                  2,510,155
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             324,968,445
<DEPOSITS>                                 277,353,323
<SHORT-TERM>                                20,398,515
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          2,159,976
<LONG-TERM>                                  4,006,119
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    21,004,567
<OTHER-SE>                                      49,945
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             324,968,445
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             23,322,817
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            2,358,479
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            25,681,296
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           8,375,055
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           9,616,618
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       16,064,678
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                1,231,403
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              10,156
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             14,590,763
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,177,029
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   2,061,137
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,061,137
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.88
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.51
<LOANS-NON>                                    946,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   689,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              1,635,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,851,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  754,000
<RECOVERIES>                                   182,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,510,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         2,510,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      2,510,000
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Villeroel, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Fisher, J.), rendered September 27, 1988, convicting him of attempted burglary in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige, 54*AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Mangano, P. J., Kunzeman, Kooper, Sullivan and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
#### John K. FINLEY, Petitioner/Respondent, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent/Appellant.

No. 69620.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

June 18, 1996.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, James Chenault, Special Asst. Atty. Gen., Mo. Dept, of Rev., Jefferson City, for appellant.

Bradley Harold Lockenvitz, Linn, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and GRIMM, JJ.

KAROHL, Judge.

The Director of Revenue appeals order setting aside driver’s license revocation as barred by the constitutional prohibition against Double Jeopardy because defendant had previously been prosecuted for a related driving while intoxicated charge.

This case is controlled by the Missouri Supreme Court’s recent decision in *State v.*
      *66
      *Mayo,*915 S.W.2d 758 (Mo. banc 1996). There, the court concluded the sanction of a license revocation or suspension is not punishment for the purposes of the Double Jeopardy Clause. It held a charge of driving while intoxicated was not barred by Double Jeopardy because the defendant’s license had been administratively suspended. Thus, it reversed the trial court’s dismissal of the charge against defendant. The facts of the present case are identical to those in a case consolidated with *Mayo*and the holdings are equally decisive.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

REINHARD, P.J., and GRIMM, J., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lucas Energy, Inc., (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
J. Cerna, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
12th day of February, 2007.


/s/ James J. Cerna
--------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer, Principal Accounting Officer
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Universal Capital Management, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ending January 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Theresa Q. Hoffmann, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Theresa Q. Hoffmann

Theresa Q. Hoffmann,

Principal Financial Officer

August 13, 2009
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The
Board of Directors
Cymer, Inc.:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-16559, No. 333-99975, No. 333-88616, No. 333-67491, No. 333-48242,
No. 333-69736, No. 333-58554, No. 333-109544, No. 333-118496, No. 333-127748, No. 333-142621, and No. 333-145089) on Form S-8 and
(No. 333-88496) on Form S-3 of Cymer, Inc. of our reports dated February 27, 2009, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Cymer, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and
2007, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows, for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008, and the
related consolidated financial statement schedule II, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, which reports appear in the December 31, 2008 Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Cymer, Inc.

Our
report refers to Cymer Inc.'s adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157,Fair Value Measurements, for
fair value measurements of all financial assets and financial liabilities and for fair value measurements of nonfinancial items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial
statements on a recurring basis, effective January 1, 2008, and Financial Accounting Standards
Board Interpretation No. 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxesan Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, effective
January 1, 2007.

/s/ KPMG LLP


San
Diego, California
February 27, 2009

---



QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 8 (Thursday, January 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2968-2969]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-766]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 2969]]

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Abess Properties, Ltd.; Acquisition of Company Engaged in 
Permissible Nonbanking Activities

    The organization listed in this notice has applied under Sec.  
225.23(a)(2) or (f) of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.23(a)(2) or 
(f)) for the Board's approval under section 4(c)(8) of the Bank Holding 
Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843(c)(8)) and Sec.  225.21(a) of Regulation Y 
(12 CFR 225.21(a)) to acquire or control voting securities or assets of 
a company engaged in a nonbanking activity that is listed in Sec.  
225.25 of Regulation Y as closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, such activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    The application is available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. Once the application has been accepted 
for processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing on the question whether consummation of the proposal can 
``reasonably be expected to produce benefits to the public, such as 
greater convenience, increased competition, or gains in efficiency, 
that outweigh possible adverse effects, such as undue concentration of 
resources, decreased or unfair competition, conflicts of interests, or 
unsound banking practices.'' Any request for a hearing on this question 
must be accompanied by a statement of the reasons a written 
presentation would not suffice in lieu of a hearing, identifying 
specifically any questions of fact that are in dispute, summarizing the 
evidence that would be presented at a hearing, and indicating how the 
party commenting would be aggrieved by approval of the proposal.
    Comments regarding the application must be received at the Reserve 
Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than 
January 26, 1995.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Zane R. Kelley, Vice President) 
104 Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303:
    1. Abess Properties, Ltd., and City National Bancshares, Inc., both 
of Miami, Florida, to acquire an additional 20.6 percent of the 
outstanding voting shares, for a total of 30.15 percent, of Turnberry 
Savings & Loan Association, North Miami Beach, Florida and thereby 
engage in operating a savings and loan association pursuant to Sec.  
225.25(b)(9) of the Board's Regulation Y. The proposed activity will be 
conducted throughout the State of Florida.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 6, 
1995.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-766 Filed 1-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cause number: 01-11-00552-CV

Style: Maxine Adams and Cecil Adams v. Rebecca Ross

Date motion filed*: 1/31/13

Type of motion: Joint Motion for Use of Original Exhibit 79

Party filing motion: Appellants

Document to be filed: Original Exhibit

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date:

Number of previous extensions granted: 0 Current Due date:

Date Requested:

The Court directs the Harris County District Clerk, or the court reporter if the exhibit is still in his or her possession, to send 

to the Clerk of this Court the original of Plaintiffs’ Exhibit 79, identified as a Voice Mail Recorder. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(g)(2). 

The Clerk of this Court is directed to cooperate with the Harris County District Clerk or the court reporter to provide for the 

safekeeping, transportation, and return of such exhibits. See id.

The original exhibit is due in this Court within 20 days of the date of this order.

Judge's signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Panel consists of ___________________________________

Date: February 12, 2013
Exhibit 32.1





Certifications Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)





In connection with the Quarterly Report (the “report”) of Sydys Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Kenneth J. Koock, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his knowledge:





(1)
the report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:
/s/ Kenneth J. KoockKenneth J. Koock

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


Date:  October 25, 2010
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4921

Scosche Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 72 (Friday, April 14, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 19102]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9257]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Advisory Panel for Neuroscience; Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Advisory Panel for Neuroscience (1158).
    Date and Time: May 2-3, 1995, 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Place: Room 310, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: Part-open.
    Contact Persons: Dr. Christopher Comer, Program Director, 
Behavioral Neuroscience; Dr. Karen Sigvardt, Program Director, 
Computational Neuroscience, Division of Integrative Biology and 
Neuroscience, Room 685, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230; Telephone: (703) 306-1416.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Minutes: May be obtained from the contact persons listed above.
    Agenda: Open Session: May 3, 1995; 11:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.; To 
discuss goals and assessment procedures. Closed Session: May 2, 
1995; 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.; May 3, 1995, 9 a.m. to 11:30 a.m., 12:30 
p.m. to 5 p.m.; To review and evaluate Behavioral and Computational 
Neuroscience proposals as part of the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed included 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: April 11, 1995.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-9257 Filed 4-13-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M