In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 18-1409V 

(not to be published)

MOHAMED MOHAMED, Administrator 

of the ESTATE OF SALAH HAMAD,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: July 17, 2020

Special Processing Unit (SPU); 

Attorney’s Fees and Costs

Renee Ja Gentry, The Law Office of Renee J. Gentry, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner.

Darryl R. Wishard, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION ON ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS1

On September 14, 2018, petitioner, as administrator for the estate of his father, 

Salah Hamad, filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury 

Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,

2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner 

alleges that his father suffered Guillain-Barré Syndrome after receiving an influenza 

vaccination on December 23, 2017, which resulted in his death on April 17, 2018. 

 1 Because this unpublished Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am 

required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the EGovernment Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic 

Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the 

internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact 

medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. 

If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from 

public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012).
2

(Petition at ¶¶ 2, 8). On October 4, 2019, a decision was issued awarding compensation 

to Petitioner based on the Respondent’s proffer. (ECF No. 27). 

Petitioner has now filed a motion for attorney’s fees and costs, dated June 1, 2020, 

(ECF No. 37), requesting a total award of $45,060.97 (representing $36,696.90 in fees 

and $8,364.07 in costs). In accordance with General Order #9, counsel for Petitioner

represent Petitioner incurred no out-of-pocket expenses. (Id. at 1). Respondent reacted 

to the motion on June 2, 2020 indicating that he is satisfied that the statutory requirements 

for an award of attorney’s fees and costs are met in this case and defers to the Court’s 

discretion to determine the amount to be awarded. Petitioner did not file a reply thereafter. 

I have reviewed the billing records submitted with Petitioner’s request. In my 

experience, the request appears reasonable, and I find no cause to reduce the requested 

hours or rates. 

The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorney’s fees and costs. § 

15(e). Accordingly, I hereby GRANT Petitioner’s Motion for attorney’s fees and costs. I 

award a total of $45,060.97 (representing $36,696.90 in attorney’s fees and $8,364.07 in 

costs) as a lump sum in the form of a check jointly payable to Petitioner and Petitioner’s 

counsel. In the absence of a timely-filed motion for review (see Appendix B to the Rules 

of the Court), the Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master

 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by filing a joint notice 

renouncing their right to seek review.