18052 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 24, 1996 / Rules and Regulations

magazine or other periodical

publication may use its own funds to

defray costs incurred in staging public

candidate debates held in accordance

with 11 CFR 110.13.

(3) A corporation or labor

organization may donate funds to

nonprofit organizations qualified under

11 CFR 110.13(a)(1) to stage candidate

debates held in accordance with 11 CFR

110.13 and 114.4(f).

* * * * *

Dated: April 18, 1996.

Lee Ann Elliott,

Chairman.

[FR Doc. 96–10038 Filed 4–23–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6715–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 11

[Docket No. 28518; Amendment No. 11–41]

General Rulemaking Procedures

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Technical amendment.

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation

Administration is making an editorial

change to part 11 by changing the words

‘‘rule making’’ and ‘‘rule-making’’ to

read ‘‘rulemaking’’. This change is being

made for consistency.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 24, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Clara Thieling, Office of the Chief

Counsel, Regulations Division, AGC–

200, Federal Aviation Administration,

800 Independence Ave., SW.,

Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202)

267–3123.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

In response to inquiries as to the

uniformity of the spelling of the word

rulemaking, the FAA is making an

editorial change to part 11 to change the

spelling of ‘‘rule-making’’ and ‘‘rule

making’’ to ‘‘rulemaking’’. Because this

action is merely a technical amendment,

the FAA finds that prior notice and

public procedure under 5 U.S.C.

553(b)(3)(B) are unnecessary. For the

same reason, the FAA finds that good

cause exists for making this amendment

effective upon publication.

The Amendment

The FAA amends 14 CFR part 11 as

follows:

PART 11—GENERAL RULEMAKING

PROCEDURES

1. The authority citation for part 11

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40101, 40103,

40105, 40109, 40113, 44110, 44502, 44701–

44702, 44711, and 46102.

2. In the heading and throughout part

11, remove the words ‘‘rule-making’’

and ‘‘rule making’’ wherever they

appear, and add the word ‘‘rulemaking’’

in their place.

Issued in Washington, DC, on March 29,

1996.

Donald P. Byrne,

Assistant Chief Counsel for Regulations,

Office of the Chief Counsel.

[FR Doc. 96–10002 Filed 4–23–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. 96–ANE–05; Amendment 39–

9568; AD 96–08–02]

Airworthiness Directives; Hamilton

Standard Models 14RF–9, 14RF–19,

14RF–21; and 14SF–5, 14SF–7, 14SF–

11, 14SFL11, 14SF–15, 14SF–17, 14SF–

19, and 14SF–23; and Hamilton

Standard/British Aerospace 6/5500/F

Propellers

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; request for

comments.

SUMMARY: This amendment supersedes

an existing airworthiness directive (AD),

applicable to Hamilton Standard Models

14RF–9, 14RF–19, 14RF–21; and 14SF–

5, 14SF–7, 14SF–11, 14SFL11, 14SF–15,

14SF–17, 14SF–19, and 14SF–23; and

Hamilton Standard/British Aerospace 6/

5500/F propellers, that currently

requires that all blades of applicable

Hamilton Standard propellers be

calibrated for ultrasonic transmissibility

before conducting the ultrasonic shear

wave inspection. In addition, that AD

decreases the repetitive inspection

interval for the Hamilton Standard

Models 14RF–9, 14SF–5, –7, –11, –15,

–17, –19, and –23 propellers from 1,250

flight cycles to 500 flight cycles. That

AD also establishes a new ultrasonic

shear wave inspection interval of 1,000

flight cycles for the Hamilton Standard

Model 14RF–19, and 2,500 flight cycles

for the Hamilton Standard Model 14RF–

21 and Hamilton Standard/British

Aerospace Model 6/5500/F. Also, that

AD removes Hamilton Standard Model

14SFL11 propellers from service. This

amendment requires a blade repair that

constitutes terminating action to the

repetitive ultrasonic taper bore

inspections. Repetitive ultrasonic taper

bore inspections are required until the

blade is repaired in accordance with

this AD. This amendment is prompted

by the development of a taper bore

repair process that removes the

damaged material and returns the blade

to a condition that does not require

repetitive ultrasonic taper bore

inspections. The actions specified by

this AD are intended to prevent

separation of a propeller blade due to

cracks initiating in the blade taper bore,

that can result in aircraft damage, and

possible loss of aircraft control.

DATES: Effective May 9, 1996.

The incorporation by reference of

Hamilton Standard Alert Service

Bulletins (ASB’s): No. 14RF–9–61–A91,

No. 14RF–19–61–A55, No. 14RF–21–

61–A73, No. 14SF–61–A93, and No. 6/

5500/F–61–A41, all dated December 7,

1995, and Hamilton Standard ASB’s No.

14RF–9–61–A91, Revision 1, No. 14RF–

19–61–A55, Revision 1, No. 14RF–21–

61–A73, and Revision 1, No. 14SF–61–

A93, all dated December 15, 1995, and

No. 6/5500/F–61–A41, Revision 1, dated

December 18, 1995; and Hamilton

Standard ASB’s No. 14RF–9–61–A95,

No. 14RF–19–61–A57, No. 14RF–21–

61–A75, No. 14SF–61–A95, and No. 6/

5500/F–61–A43, all dated December 18,

1995, and Hamilton Standard ASB’s No.

14RF–9–61–A95, Revision 1, No. 14RF–

19–61–A57, Revision 1, No. 14RF–21–

61–A75, Revision 1, No. 14SF–61–A95,

Revision 1, and No. 6/5500/F–61–A43,

Revision 1, all dated December 21, 1995,

was previously approved by the Director

of the Federal Register as of January 9,

1996 (61 FR 617).

The incorporation by reference of

Hamilton Standard ASB’s No. 14RF–9–

61–A94, Revision 1, dated March 6,

1996; No. 14RF–19–61–A53, Revision 1,

dated March 6, 1996; No. 14RF–21–61–

A72, Revision 1, dated March 6, 1996;

No. 14SF–61–A92, Revision 1, dated

March 6, 1996; and No. 6/5500/F–61–

A39, Revision 1, dated March 6, 1996;

is approved by the Director of the

Federal Register as of May 9, 1996.

Comments for inclusion in the Rules

Docket must be received on or before

June 24, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments in

triplicate to the Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), New England

Region, Office of the Assistant Chief

Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket No.

96–ANE–05, 12 New England Executive

Park, Burlington, MA 01803–5299.

Comments may also be submitted to the

following Internet address: ‘‘epdadcomments@mail.hq.faa.gov’’.