alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.6



 Exhibit 10.6 

Lock-Up Agreement  

_________ __, ______ 
  

			
	 By Facsimile (    )
	  	 By Facsimile ((804) 648-3404)

	Shangri-La Tibetan Pharmaceuticals, inc.	  	Anderson & Strudwick, Incorporated
	B	  	707 East Main Street
	Shangri-La County, Diqing	  	20th Floor

	Yunnan Province, China 674400	  	Richmond, Virginia 23219
	Attn: Hong Yu	  	Attn: L. McCarthy Downs, III,
	         CEO	  	         Senior Vice President


Re: Lock-Up Agreement 
 Dear Mr. Yu and
Mr. Downs: 
 The undersigned understands that Anderson & Strudwick, Incorporated (the “Placement
Agent”), proposes to enter into a Placement Agreement with Shangri-La Tibetan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”), providing for the public offering (the “Offering”), by the Placement Agent of a minimum of 1,500,000 common
shares and a maximum of 1,875,000 common shares (the “Shares”). 
 In consideration of the
Placement Agent’s agreement to undertake the Offering of the Shares on a “best efforts, minimum/maximum” basis, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the undersigned agrees that
the undersigned will not register, offer, sell, contract to sell or grant any Shares or any securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for the Shares or any warrants to purchase the Shares (including, without limitation, securities
of the Company which may be deemed to be beneficially owned by the undersigned in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and securities which may be issued upon the exercise of a stock option or warrant)
for a period of (a) as to one-half
( 
1/2) of
 the Shares now or in the future beneficially owned by the undersigned, ninety (90) days after the date of effectiveness or commencement of sales of the public offering and (b) as to the other one-half of such Shares now or in the future
beneficially owned by such individual, one hundred ninety (190) days after the date of effectiveness or commencement of sales of the public offering. The obligations under this lock-up period are separate from any obligations that may relate to
the Make Good Escrow Agreement to be entered between the Placement Agent, an escrow agent, the Company and certain shareholders of the Company on the date hereof. 

The undersigned understands that the Company, the Placement Agent and the Representatives will proceed with the Offering in reliance upon
this Lock-up Agreement. 
  

			
	Very truly yours,
		
	By:	 	 
	Name:	 	 
	Its:
Exhibit
32.1
 
 Certifications
Pursuant to
 Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 (18
U.S.C. Section 1350)
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report (the “report”) of Sydys Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, Kenneth J. Koock, Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350),
that to his knowledge:
 
 (1)
              the
      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              the
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
   By:
                /s/ Kenneth
      J. KoockKenneth
      J. Koock
                  Chief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
  Date:  February
13, 2009
#### Ramon SANCHEZ, Appellant, v. Jim JONES, et al., Respondents.

No. WD 43076.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

March 19, 1991.

Ramon Sanchez, Pacific, pro se.

*709William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Christine A. Alsop, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondents.

Before NUGENT, C.J., P.J., and ULRICH and BRECKENRIDGE, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from dismissal of an inmate’s civil action against prison officials.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 32.2

                                 XACT AID, INC.

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Xact Aid, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles Miseroy, the
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original copy of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Xact Aid, Inc. and will be retained by Xact Aid, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated: May 19, 2006

/s/ Charles Miseroy
Charles Miseroy
Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lucas Energy, Inc., (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James J. Cerna,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
7th day of August, 2006.


/s/ James J. Cerna
-----------------------------
Chief Executive Officer, Principal Accounting Officer
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 80 (Wednesday, April 24, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 18125]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-10010]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
[CFDA No.: 84.314A]


Even Start Statewide Family Literacy Initiative Grants; Notice 
Extending the Application Deadline Date for New Even Start Statewide 
Family Literacy Initiative Grant Awards With Fiscal Year (FY) 1995 
Funds

SUMMARY: The Secretary extends the deadline date for the submission of 
applications for new Even Start Statewide Family Literacy Initiative 
grant awards with FY 1995 funds to May 31, 1996. A notice was published 
in the Federal Register on March 26, 1996 (61 FR 13358) specifying that 
the application deadline for these awards was May 10, 1996. In response 
to requests from the public for a longer period to prepare 
applications, the Department has decided to extend the application 
deadline.

FOR APPLICATIONS OR INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia McKee, Compensatory 
Education Programs, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, U.S. 
Department of Education, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W. (4400, Portals), 
Washington, DC 20202-6132. Telephone (202) 260-0991. Individuals who 
use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal 
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 between 8 a.m. and 8 
p.m., Eastern time, Monday through Friday.

    Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 6362(c).

    Dated: April 18, 1996.
Gerald N. Tirozzi,
Assistant Secretary, Elementary and Secondary Education.
[FR Doc. 96-10010 Filed 4-23-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P
#### Mark A. Fiegl, as Administrator of the Estates of Rebecca A. Fiegl and Another, Deceased, et al., Respondents, v 1695 Ridge Road Webster Inn Restaurant, Inc., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied the motion of defendants 1695 Ridge Road Webster Inn Restaurant, Inc. and Philip Cubiotti for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ causes of action under the Dram Shop Act (General Obligations Law § 11-101).

*1025The accident which caused the injuries to plaintiff Dolores Fiegl and the deaths of plaintiff Mark Fiegl’s wife and child occurred shortly after codefendant Haydock left the Webster Inn. Although defendant submitted EBT testimony of several witnesses to the effect that Haydock did not exhibit any signs of being intoxicated, police at the scene of the accident had no difficulty determining that he had been drinking and was intoxicated. Haydock admitted that he had three martinis at the Webster Inn and did not go to any other bars between the time he left the Webster Inn and the accident, which occurred at 2:00 p.m. His blood alcohol level at 5:00 p.m. was .16/.17%. Plaintiffs’ expert opined that, based on the test results, Hay-dock would have to have consumed more than three martinis at lunch. Furthermore, Haydock pleaded guilty to driving while intoxicated. This evidence presents a question of fact concerning how much alcohol Haydock in fact consumed and whether he was actually or apparently intoxicated when served at the Webster Inn *(see, Wasserman v Godoy,*136 AD2d 631, 632). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Wayne County, Strobridge, J.—summary judgment.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 107 (Monday, June 7, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 30322]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-11880]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Multi-Component Application.
    Date: July 21, 2021.
    Time: 12:45 p.m. to 5:15 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Video Meeting).
    Contact Person: Dario Dieguez, Jr., Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, 
National Institutes of Health, Gateway Building, Suite 2W200, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301.827.3101, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a7c3c6d5cec889c3cec2c0d2c2dde7c9cecf89c0c8d1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="670306150e0849030e020012021d27090e0f49000811">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 2, 2021.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-11880 Filed 6-4-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 99.3

Press Release

RATING AGENCIES AFFIRM INVESTMENT GRADE RATING ON
INTERPOOL DEBT

PRINCETON, NJ, March 11, 2003 - Interpool, Inc. (NYSE:IPX) said
that rating agencies Moody's, Standard & Poor's and Fitch affirmed their
ratings on the Company's senior debt.

In a report Standard & Poor's said its rating was `not
affected' by the Company's announcement that it would restate earnings for 2000
and 2001 as well as delay reporting 2002 results until prior periods can be re
audited. In a March 7 announcement, Moody's said, `In Moody's opinion, the
accounting changes and cumulative restatements do not represent a significant
change in the company's earnings or credit profile.' In the announcement,
Moody's also said, `Interpool continues to generate strong core earnings and
sound asset quality performance consistent with analysts' expectations and the
current stage of the economic cycle.' Fitch Ratings, in its March 7 announcement
said, `Minimal impact on Interpool's financial position is expected from these
non-cash adjustments and charges.'

According to Interpool chairman and chief executive officer
Martin Tuchman, "We believe these rating affirmations by independent
agencies provide important context to our decision, in consultation with our
auditors, to restate prior periods. The restatement does not materially affect
the ability of Interpool to service its debts. Moreover, with more than $350
million in equity, significant growth capital and increasing utilization rates
for our chassis and containers, we remain optimistic about Interpool's prospects
in the coming year."

Interpool is one of the world's leading suppliers of equipment
and services to the transportation industry. It is the largest lessor of
intermodal container chassis and a world-leading lessor of cargo containers used
in international trade. Interpool operates from over 240 locations throughout
the world.

This Press Release contains certain forward-looking statements
regarding future circumstances. These forward-looking statements are subject to
risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially
from those contemplated in such forward-looking statements, including in
particular the risks and uncertainties described in the company's SEC filings.
The company undertakes no obligation to publicly release any revisions to these
forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date
hereof.

For Interpool Inc.
Contact:
Mitchell Gordon
Executive Vice President &
Chief Financial Officer
(212) 916-3284
mgordon@interpool.com
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kenneth Campbell, Appellant.

Supreme Court, New York County (Daniel FitzGerald, J., at suppression hearing; Franklin Weissberg, J., at jury trial and sentence), rendered January 31, 1989, convicting defendant of robbery in the second degree and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 5 to 10 years, unanimously affirmed.

The victim was accosted by defendant and another, who then made off with the victim’s shoulder bag. A few minutes later, the victim found police officers and pointed out his attackers a few blocks from the scene of the robbery. The officers promptly subdued defendant and the victim recovered his bag. Some of the items missing from the bag were thereafter recovered at the precinct, during a search of defendant and his accomplice.

On appeal, defendant claims that the victim’s identification testimony was improperly bolstered *(cf., People v Trowbridge,*305 NY 471) and that the prosecutor’s summation deprived him of a fair trial. However, both issues are unpreserved and, in light of the overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt, we decline to reach them. We would nevertheless affirm were we to consider the claims in the interest of justice, finding them to be without merit. Concur—Ross, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cardinal Financial Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bernard H. Clineburg, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  This
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| | /s/ Bernard H. ClineburgBernard H. Clineburg
Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2002
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
Gregory Lykiardopoulos, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Triton Distribution Systems, Inc. on Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal
quarter ended September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Triton
Distribution Systems, Inc.









Date:
      November 14, 2008
            By:/s/ Gregory
      LykiardopoulosGregory
      LykiardopoulosChief Executive
      Officer








I,
Michael W. Overby, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Triton Distribution Systems, Inc. on Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal
quarter ended September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Triton
Distribution Systems, Inc.








Date:
      November 14, 2008
            By:/s/ Michael W.
      OverbyMichael
      W. OverbyChief Financial
      Officer
#### Britt G. RADFORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 40288.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Nov. 1, 1988.

Susan L. Hogan, Columbia, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before KENNEDY, C.J., and MANFORD and BERREY, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from denial, after evidentiary hearing, of Rule 27.26 motion for post-conviction relief.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED. Rule 84.-16(b).
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-7465

Nissan North America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In
connection with the Quarterly Report of WMG Acquisition Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Edgar Bronfman, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of WMG Acquisition Corp., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: February 14, 2006



/S/    EDGAR BRONFMAN,
JR.Edgar Bronfman, Jr. Chief Executive Officer