alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6770

Johnson Electric North America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-139455,
No. 333-128146 and No. 333-113611) and Form S-8 (No. 333-147826, No. 333-144673,
No. 333-137010, No. 333-134428, No. 333-116960, No. 333-116959, No. 333-105553,
No. 333-97369, No. 333-63070, No. 333-42656, No. 333-04186 and No. 333-30111) of Conceptus, Inc.
of our report dated March 13, 2008 relating to the consolidated financial statements, financial statement schedule and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which
appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

San
Jose, California
March 13, 2008

---



QuickLinks
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2768

Price Pump Company:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6505

Char-Broil LLC:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_05.09.19.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
#### In the Matter of Thomas J. Whitney, Appellant, v Irene A. Whitney, Respondent.

Mahoney, P. J.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Washington County (Berke, J.), entered May 30, 1989, which, *inter alia,*dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, for physical custody of the parties’ children.

The parties have two sons born in 1975 and 1980. They were divorced in 1988 pursuant to a judgment which incorporated but did not merge therein a stipulation providing for *811joint custody with physical custody with respondent and visitation for petitioner. Within six months, petitioner commenced this proceeding for custody. Following a hearing, Family Court found that physical custody should remain with respondent but that petitioner’s visitation should be increased. Respondent also was awarded $350 in counsel fees. Petitioner appeals.

The primary concern in custody modification cases is the best interest of the child *(see, e.g., Eschbach v Eschbach,*56 NY2d 167, 171). Each case must be decided on its own facts considering such matters as an agreement by the parties concerning custody and the wishes of the child, although no single factor is dispositive *(supra,*at 171-173). The assessment of the trial court usually is afforded great deference *(supra,*at 173-174).

Considering these prevailing principles, we are of the view that the order appealed from should be affirmed. There is no serious question that both parties are fit and loving parents. It also appears from the record that the children have been seriously upset by their parents’ divorce so that the behavioral problems exhibited are not unexpected. The six-month period between the divorce decree and petitioner’s filing of this petition was a relatively short time in which to resolve these problems and Family Court’s provisions for counseling seem well designed to help ameliorate them. The preference of a child is not dispositive to the issue of custody *(supra,*at 172-173). The resolution is in accord with the recommendations of one court-appointed analyst and the Law Guardian. The record, considered as a whole, supports Family Court’s order.

Petitioner also contends that the award of counsel fees to respondent was granted improperly in the absence of a statement of net worth under 22 NYCRR 202.16. This regulation, however, applies only when such statement is required pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 236, which is not the case here. It appears that the parties’ financial conditions were addressed in the reports to Family Court concerning custody and there is no suggestion that the information provided was erroneous. Under such circumstances, we are of the view that Family Court did not abuse its discretion in its modest award of counsel fees to respondent.

Order affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Weiss, Yesawich, Jr., and Mercure, JJ., concur.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

August 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4426

David C. Poole Company:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 67 (Friday, April 7, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 17653-17654]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8621]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Part 675

[Docket No. 950206040-5040-01; I.D. 040395D]


Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Area; Trawl 
Yellowfin Sole Fishery in Zone 1

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Closure.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS is closing the directed fishery for yellowfin sole by 
vessels using trawl gear in Bycatch Limitation Zone 1 (Zone 1) of the 
Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands management area (BSAI). This action is 
necessary to prevent exceeding the prohibited species catch (PSC) 
allowance of C. bairdi Tanner crab apportioned to the trawl yellowfin 
sole fishery category in Zone 1.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 12 noon, Alaska local time (A.l.t.), April 4, 1995, 
until 12 midnight, A.l.t., December 31, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew N. Smoker, 907-586-7228.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The groundfish fishery in the BSAI exclusive 
economic zone is managed by NMFS according to the Fishery Management 
Plan for the Groundfish Fishery of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands 
Area (FMP) prepared by the North Pacific Fishery Management Council 
under authority of the Magnuson Fishery Conservation and Management 
Act. Fishing by U.S. vessels is governed by regulations implementing 
the FMP at 50 CFR parts 620 and 675.
    The 1995 PSC allowance of C. bairdi Tanner crab in Zone 1 for the 
trawl yellowfin sole fishery category, which is described at 
Sec. 675.21(b)(1)(iii)(B)(1), was established as 225,000 crabs in Table 
7 on page 8485 of the 1995 specifications (60 FR 8479, February 14, 
1995).
    The Director, Alaska Region, NMFS, has determined, in accordance 
with Sec. 675.21(c)(1)(i), that the PSC allowance [[Page 17654]] of C. 
bairdi Tanner crab for the trawl yellowfin sole fishery in Zone 1 has 
been reached. Therefore, NMFS is prohibiting directed fishing for 
yellowfin sole by vessels using trawl gear in Zone 1 of the BSAI.
    Directed fishing standards for applicable gear types may be found 
in the regulations at Sec. 675.20(h).

Classification

    This action is taken under Sec. 675.21 and is exempt from review 
under E.O. 12866.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: April 3, 1995.
Richard W. Surdi,
Acting Director, Office of Fisheries Conservation and Management, 
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 95-8621 Filed 4-4-95; 4:13 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 70 (Wednesday, April 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 18654]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8960]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION


Aviation Proceedings; Agreements Filed During the Week Ended 
March 31, 1995

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under the provisions of 49 U.S.C. 412 and 414. Answers 
may be filed within 21 days of date of filing.

    Docket Number: 50241.
    Date filed: March 29, 1995.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: COMP Telex Reso 024f, Local Currency Fare Changes--Spain.
    Proposed Effective Date: April 15, 1995.
Paulette V. Twine,
Chief, Documentary Services Division.
[FR Doc. 95-8960 Filed 4-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.2



                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Planet Polymer Technologies, Inc. on and Form S-8 (No. 333-1042) of our report,
which contains an explanatory paragraph relating to the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern, dated March 18, 2004 on the financial statements of
Planet Polymer Technologies, Inc. as of December 31, 2003 and for the years
ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, which report is included in this Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB/A.


                                       /S/ J. H. COHN LLP


San Diego, California
August 13, 2004
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6853

Hartland Controls, LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions.

pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7836

Alps Electric (North America), Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of FedFirst Financial Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
John G. Robinson, the President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    (1)      The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a)
             or 15(d) of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Company.



Date: November 14, 2005                 /s/ John G. Robinson
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        John G. Robinson
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Zoran Cvetojevic, hereby certify,
pursuant to and solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except for the lack of audited reports, and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







| | By:  /s/ Zoran Cvetojevic                                          
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Zoran Cvetojevic                                                   
| | Interim Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer
| |                                                                    
| |                                                                    
| | September 16, 2013
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-7461

Nissan North America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

Appellate case name: Ezy-Lift of California, Inc. and Eagle Electronics, Inc. v. EZY 

Acquisition, LLC d/b/a EZY Lift

Appellate case number: 01-13-00058-CV

Trial court case number: 2010-70596

Trial court: 270th District Court of Harris County

It is ordered that Appellants’ Motion for Rehearing is denied.

Justice’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

 Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Justices Jennings, Brown, and Huddle

Date: August 26, 2014
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE MATTER

OF J.Z.,

A JUVENILE.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-19-00049-CV

Appeal from the

65th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 1601161)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the Appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal and 

concludes the motion should be granted and the appeal should be dismissed. We therefore dismiss 

the appeal.

It appearing to this Court that Appellant is indigent for purposes of appeal, this Court makes 

no other order with respect thereto. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 14TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2019.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.