alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 2 8 , 2017 

# Order

Clerk April 2 8 , 2017

15 5 4 9 6 ( 64 )

GERALD L. WISNER and KAY E. WISNER

, Plaintiff s

- Appell ants

, SC: 15 5 4 9 6

v COA: 3 28867

Lenawee CC : 1 3

- 004674

- CB

SB INDIANA

, LLC, WBM

, LLC, QUANTUM

MANAGEMENT & INVESTMENTS

, LLC, and

GREGGORY HARDY

, Defendant s

- Appell ee s.

_________________________________________

THEODORE J. DORR and THEODORE J. DORR

, LLC,

Plaintiffs

- Appellants,

SC: 155496

v COA: 333045

Lenawee CC : 12

- 004566

- CB

WBM

, LLC, QUANTUM MANAGEMENT &

INVESTMENT

, LLC, and GREGGORY HARDY,

Defendants

- Appellees.

____________________________ _____ ____ _

___ /

On order of the C hief Justice , the motion of defendants

- appell ee s to extend the

time for filing their answer to the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The

answer will be accepted as timely filed if submitted on or before May 1 9 , 2017.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 522 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 522

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of 
 Veterans Affairs to provide or assist in providing a vehicle adapted 
 for operation by disabled individuals to certain eligible persons, to 
  pay expenses associated with the delivery of such vehicle, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 25, 2023

  Mr. Moylan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of 
 Veterans Affairs to provide or assist in providing a vehicle adapted 
 for operation by disabled individuals to certain eligible persons, to 
  pay expenses associated with the delivery of such vehicle, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Deliver for Veterans Act''.

SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY FOR DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS COVERAGE OF 
              COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH DELIVERY OF AN ADAPTIVE VEHICLE.

    Section 3902(a) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``by paying the total purchase price of the automobile or 
other conveyance'' and inserting ``by paying the total purchase price 
of the automobile or other conveyance, and the total shipping price to 
deliver the automobile or other conveyance to the veteran''.
                                 <all>
```
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 13, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3803

Knowles Corporation:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests and the 

request failed to show that this particular product is available only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>     0001052517
<NAME>    TRUMP ATLANTIC CITY FUNDING II, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,406
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,406
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  74,474
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,406
<BONDS>                                         73,068
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    74,474
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,437
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21
 
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                           PERCENTAGE OF VOTING
                                                           SECURITIES OWNED BY
                                           ORGANIZED UNDER   REGISTRANT AS OF
                                               LAW OF         MARCH 29, 1998
                                           --------------- --------------------
<S>                                        <C>             <C>
Aseco Investment Corporation.............   Massachusetts          100%
Aseco International Sales Corporation....   Barbados               100%
Aseco International Inc..................   Delaware               100%
Aseco Malaysia Sdn. Bhd..................   Malaysia               100%
Aseco (Singapore) Pte. Ltd...............   Singapore              100%
Aseco Branch, Inc........................   Delaware               100%
Western Equipment Developments (Holdings)
 Ltd.....................................   England                100%
</TABLE>
 
                                      A-1
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 9 (Friday, January 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 3207]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-860]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-15-004]


Texas Eastern Transmission Corp.; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

January 9, 1995.
    Take notice that on January 3, 1995, Texas Eastern Transmission 
Corporation (Texas Eastern) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Sixth Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets:

Second Sub First Revised Sheet No. 503
Second Sub First Revised Sheet No. 504

    Texas Eastern states that on December 14, 1994, it filed tariff 
sheets in compliance with the Commission's November 30, 1994 order in 
Docket No. RP95-15 (November 30 Order). Subsequently, pursuant to 
further conversations with Brooklyn Union Gas Company, Texas Eastern 
states that it has concluded that, in the context of the customer-
specific operational flow orders contemplated by Section 4.3(L), the 
parenthetical expression ``(reflecting any reduction attributable to 
applicable customer-specific operational flow orders)'' is not 
necessary. Accordingly, such phrase has been deleted in these second 
substitute tariff sheets.
    The proposed effective date of the tariff sheets is December 1, 
1994, as required by the November 30 Order.
    Texas Eastern states that copies of the filing were served on firm 
customers of Texas Eastern and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sec. 385.211 of 
the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests should be 
filed on or before January 17, 1995. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this 
filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-860 Filed 1-12-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 69 (Tuesday, April 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 18396]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8776]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Science Board Task Force on Unique Surveillance 
Technologies

ACTION:  Change in Date/Location of Advisory Committee Meeting Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The meeting of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Unique 
Surveillance Technologies scheduled for April 4-6, 1995 as published in 
the Federal Register (Vol. 60, No. 62, Page 16630, Friday, March 31, 
1995, FR Doc. 95-7891) will be held on April 20-21, 1995 at the 
institute for Defense Analyses, 1801 North Beauregard Street, 
Alexandria, Virginia.

    Dated: April 5, 1995.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 95-8776 Filed 4-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 69 (Tuesday, April 11, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 18378]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8892]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
26 CFR Part 1

[EE-45-94]
RIN 1545-AS94


Self-Employment Tax Treatment of Members of Certain Limited 
Liability Companies; Hearing

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Change of date for public hearing on proposed regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document changes the date of the public hearing on 
proposed regulations concerning the treatment of members of certain 
limited liability companies.

DATES: The public hearing is changed to Friday, June 23, 1995, 
beginning at 10:00 a.m.

ADDRESSES: The public hearing will be held in the Internal Revenue 
Service Auditorium, Seventh floor, 7400 Corridor, Internal Revenue 
Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC. Submit requests 
to speak and outlines or oral comments to the Internal Revenue Service, 
P.O. Box 7604, Ben Franklin, Attn: CC:DOM:CORP:T:R [EE-45-94], Room 
5228, Washington, DC 20044.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christina Vasquez of the Regulations 
Unit, Assistant Chief Counsel (Corporate), (202) 622-6803 (not a toll-
free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A notice of proposed rulemaking and notice 
of public hearing appearing in the Federal Register on Thursday, 
December 29, 1994 (59 FR 67253), announced that the Service would hold 
a public hearing on proposed regulations concerning the treatment of 
members of certain limited liability companies on Thursday, June 15, 
1995, beginning at 10:00 a.m. in the IRS Auditorium.
    The date of public hearing has changed. The hearing is scheduled 
for Friday, June 23, 1995, beginning at 10:00 am. The requests to speak 
and outlines or oral comments must be received by Thursday, May 25, 
1995. Because of controlled access restrictions, attenders are not 
admitted beyond the lobby of the Internal Revenue Building until 9:45 
a.m.
    The Service will prepare an agenda showing the scheduling of the 
speakers after the outlines are received from the persons testifying 
and make copies available free of charge at the hearing.
Cynthia E. Grigsby,
Chief, Regulations Unit Assistant Chief Counsel (Corporate).
[FR Doc. 95-8892 Filed 4-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Exhibit
10.1


 


ENTERPRISE
BANCORP, INC.


 


Directors’
Compensation Arrangements


 


As of March 16, 2010, Enterprise Bank and Trust Company (the “Bank”),
which is the principal subsidiary of Enterprise Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”),
has updated the compensation arrangements for its outside directors (i.e.,
non-employee directors), to be effective as of March 29, 2010, as shown
below.


 


Monthly Retainer Fees


 


·                  All directors -
$600 ($7,200 annually)


 


·                  All members of
Executive Committee - $200 ($2,400 annually)


 


Quarterly Retainer Fees


 


·                  Chair of Audit
Committee - $1,875 ($7,500 annually)


 


·                  Vice Chair of
Audit Committee - $1,000 ($4,000 annually)


 


·                  Chair of all
other committees (other than Marketing and Business Development and Executive
Committees) - $1,500 ($6,000 annually)


 


·                  Secretary -
$125 ($500 annually)


 


Per Meeting Fees


 


·                  Board of
Directors meetings - $350


 


·                  Executive
Committee meetings - $450


 


·                  Audit Committee
meetings - $450


 


·                  All other
committee meetings - $350


 


·                  Annual Board
strategic planning session - $1,000


 


Equity Compensation Awards


 


As of March 16, 2010, each outside director has received a grant
of restricted stock, which vests over a period of two years (50% vesting on the
first and second anniversary of the date of grant), with an aggregate fair
market value on the date of grant of approximately $7,200.  Outside directors may receive additional
future grants of restricted stock or other equity-based compensation awards on
an annual or other periodic basis as may be determined by the Board of
Directors on the recommendation of the Compensation Committee.


 


Right to Elect Stock in Lieu of Fees


 


Each outside director has the right to make an irrevocable election for
each year (by no later than December 31st of the
preceding year) to receive shares of the Company’s common stock in lieu of
receiving an elected portion of cash fees.  The number of shares issued to an outside director
in any year of service pursuant to this election is based on the fair market
value of the common stock as of the first trading day of the year for which the
election applies.
#### W. J. HARRELSON et al. v. E. J. COX et al.

(Filed 28 January, 1935.)

Mortgages F c—

A complaint alleging that a mortgagee in possession by fraud and artifice procured tbe mortgagors to deed bim tbeir equity of redemption is good as against a demurrer unaffected of admissions made by counsel in response to interrogation by tbe court.

Appeal by plaintiffs from *Oranmer, J.,*at April Term, 1934, of BladeN.

Civil action in ejectment, for an accounting, and to remove cloud from title.

Tbe complaint alleges:

1. That on 1 May, 1922, tbe plaintiffs executed to E. J. Cox a mortgage on tbeir eighteen acres of land situate in Bladen County, to secure payment of tbeir certain indebtedness to bim.

2. That on 1 November, 1923, tbe said E. J. Cox, mortgagee, agreed to .take over said lands, and out of tbe crops to pay taxes, dues to tbe Federal Land Bank, etc., and to restore possession of said premises at tbe end of five years free and clear of all encumbrances.

3. That thereafter, on 1 December, 1923, by artifice, fraud, etc., tbe said E. J. Cox forced tbe plaintiffs against tbeir will to execute deed for said premises to himself and wife.

4. That on 5 December, 1925, with intent to cheat and deprive tbe plaintiffs of tbeir equity of redemption in said lands, tbe said E. J. Cox and wife, with full knowledge and ulterior design, attempted to sell tbe same to tbeir codefendant, L. B. Hayes;

*652Wherefore, plaintiffs pray for relief:

The following judgment was entered: “It appearing to the court upon the reading of the pleadings and admissions of counsel in response to questions by the court that the plaintiff has not pleaded facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and that the plaintiff is not entitled to recover of the defendants, or either of them;

“It is now, on motion . . . ordered and adjudged that . . . this action he and the same is hereby dismissed.”

Plaintiffs appeal, assigning errors.

*A. M. Moore for plaintiffs.*

*Hector H. Clark for defendants Cox.*

*R. J. Hester, Jr., and Oliver Carter, Jr., for defendant Hayes.*

Stacy, C. J.

We think there was error in dismissing the action as upon demurrer to the complaint. Where a mortgagee takes from his mortgagor a deed for the mortgaged premises, under circumstances such as here alleged, the transaction is open to investigation, with the burden of fairness upon the mortgagee. *Hinton v. West, post,*708; *Jones v. Williams,*176 N. C., 245, 96 S. E., 1036; *Cole v. Boyd,*175 N. C., 555, 95 S. E., 778; *Jones v. Pullen,*115 N. C., 465, 20 S. E., 624. In this jurisdiction the principle is often referred to as the “doctrine of *McLeod v. Bullard ”*84 N. C., 516, approved on rehearing, 86 N. C., 210: “Where a mortgagee buys the equity of redemption of his mortgagor, the law presumes fraud, and the burden of proof is upon the mortgagee to show the *bona jides*of the transaction.”

We are not advised as to what admissions were made by counsel in response to the court’s interrogatories, but the complaint would seem to be good as against a demurrer. *Dix-Downing v. White,*206 N. C., 567, 174 S. E., 451.

Reversed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 26, 2011 

t0919 

Order 

 

September 26, 2011 

143289 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 143289 

 COA: 303740 

Genesee CC: 10-026986-FC 

AARON SCOTT PRIM, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 3, 2011 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
No. 04–14–00342–CV

RICHARD A. RODRIGUEZ IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

vs. FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. AT SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

Advisory Regarding an Exhibit Volume of the Reporter’s Record

Comes now appellant Richard A. Rodriguez, and submits this advisory regarding a

computerized exhibit volume of the reporter’s record.

The reporter’s record has a volume of exhibits with the electronic file name: 04-14-

00342-CV RPT Record V3 Erminia Uviedo 7-28-14.pdf. The first page of the volume is

entitled “February 11, 2014 Volume 3 of 3”.

The scanning device used to create the scanned images of the exhibits produced them

in a very magnified state, such that they have to be reduced significantly in order to be

viewed in a normally usable fashion.

The Adobe Acrobat computer screen page viewer will display the face sheet identifying

the exhibit, and when the the next page is displayed–the first page of an exhibit–it is so

large that it has to be reduced down to about 20% of its usual size in order to be viewed in

a similar way as the exhibit face sheet. At that reduced size, the exhibit face sheets are not

legible.

As was noted in the advisory submitted yesterday regarding a volume of the record,

this exhibit volume could still be used in preparing a brief, and so no motion to correct the

record was made under Tex. R. App. P. 34.6.

The undersigned does not know what scanning device and computer program were

used to create the exhibit volume. This information is being provided so that its creation

may be examined, and if a decision would be made to re-do the volume, it could be done

while the appeal is still in progress.

1

ACCEPTED

04-14-00342-CV

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

12/31/2014 9:26:17 AM

KEITH HOTTLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 12/31/2014 9:26:17 AM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
Respectfully Submitted,

/s/ R. Robert Willmann, Jr.

R. Robert Willmann, Jr.

P.O. Box 460167

San Antonio, Texas 78246

Tel 844-244-9973

Temporary Fax 361-552-4305

Bar No. 21655960

willaw@idworld.net

Attorney for Richard A. Rodriguez

Certificate of Service

I certify that this document was served by–

electronic service, or by fax, as applicable, to Marcie Schout, Quilling, Selander,

Lownds, Wislett & Moser, 2001 Bryan Street, Suite 1800, Dallas, Texas 75201 (attorney

for JPMorgan Chase Bank), and

e-mail to Erminia Uviedo, Court Reporter, Bexar County Justice Center, San Antonio,

Texas 78205,

on the 31st day of December, 2014.

/s/ R. Robert Willmann, Jr.

R. Robert Willmann, Jr.

2
#### Charles P. KELLEY, Petitioner, v. Denise I. KELLEY, Respondent, Richard and Patsy Kelley, Appellant.

No. WD 51157.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Submitted April 17, 1996.

June 18, 1996.

Carl E. Laurent, Independence, for appellant.

Allen S. Russell, Kansas City, for respondent.

Before LAURA DENVIR STITH, P. J„ and ULRICH and SMART, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Richard and Patsy Kelley appeal a judgment entered against them on a suit brought by Denise Kelley to establish a constructive trust in certain residential property. The arguments of appellants have been carefully considered and are ruled against them.

Judgment is affirmed. A memorandum is furnished to the parties to the appeal. Rule 84.16(b).