Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 68 / Monday, April 10, 1995 / Rules and Regulations 18005

(23) Lidocaine. Products containing

more than 5.0 mg of lidocaine in a

single package (i.e., retail unit) shall be

packaged in accordance with the

provisions of § 1700.15(a) and (b).

(24) Dibucaine. Products containing

more than 0.5 mg of dibucaine in a

single package (i.e., retail unit) shall be

packaged in accordance with the

provisions of § 1700.15(a) and (b).

Dated: April 3, 1995.

Sadye E. Dunn,

Secretary, Consumer Product Safety

Commission.

Appendix 1—List of References

(This Appendix will not be printed in

the Code of Federal Regulations.)

1. Memorandum from CPSC’s Directorate

for Health Sciences, dated June 21, 1990

(toxicity).

2. Memorandum from CPSC’s Directorate

for Health Sciences, dated July 24, 1989

(technical feasibility, practicability, and

appropriateness).

3. Memorandum from CPSC’s Directorate

for Economic Analysis, dated December 10,

1991 (a. economic information; b. regulatory

flexibility analysis; and c. environmental

assessment).

4. Death and injury data:

a. CPSC Death Certificate File, 1981,

lidocaine.

b. CPSC Injury or Potential Injury Incident

File, 1984, lidocaine.

c. FDA Drugs and Biologics Adverse

Reaction Reporting System Data Base, 1979,

lidocaine.

d. CPSC Death Certificate File, 1987,

dibucaine.

e. CPSC Death Certificate File, 1988,

dibucaine.

5. FDA Drugs and Biologics Adverse

Reaction Reporting System Data Base.

6. CPSC National Electronic Injury

Surveillance System Data Base—1978

through April 1990.

7. National Clearinghouse for Poison

Control Centers Data Base 1980–1984.

8. AAPCC National Data Collection System

1984–1988.

9. Briefing package, OS #3309, ‘‘Draft

Proposed Rules—Special Packaging

Standards For Topical Anesthetics,’’

February 27, 1992.

10. Briefing package, ‘‘Supplemental

Information—Special Packaging Standards

For Topical Anesthetics,’’ May 27, 1992.

11. Log of Meeting with Ciba Consumer

Pharmaceuticals, April 8, 1992.

12. Memorandum from CPSC’s Directorate

for Economic Analysis, ‘‘Market Sketch:

Topical Preparations Containing Lidocaine

and Dibucaine,’’ Oct. 2, 1990 (revised April

23, 1992).

13. Memorandum from CPSC’s Directorate

for Economic Analysis, ‘‘Supplemental

Information on Lidocaine and Dibucaine,’’

April 23, 1992.

14. Memorandum from CPSC’s Directorate

for Health Sciences, ‘‘The Amount of

Lidocaine and Dibucaine in Marketed

Products,’’ April 27, 1992.

15. Memorandum from CPSC’s Directorate

for Economic Analysis, ‘‘Amended Economic

Data: Proposal to Require Child-Resistant

Packaging for Topical Preparations

Containing Lidocaine or Dibucaine,’’ dated

April 27, 1992 (with revised preliminary

economic assessment).

16. Memorandum from CPSC’s Directorate

for Health Sciences, ‘‘Additional Human

Experience Data for Lidocaine and

Dibucaine,’’ April 27, 1992.

17. Memorandum from CPSC’s Directorate

for Health Sciences, ‘‘Supplemental

Information on Lidocaine and Dibucaine,’’

May 28, 1992.

18. Log of Meeting with NDMA Lidocaine/

Dibucaine Task Force, October 15, 1992.

19. Comments on proposed rule (10). On

file in the Office of the Secretary.

20. Log of meeting with Ciba Consumer

Pharmaceuticals, January 11, 1994.

21. Log of Meeting with NDMA Lidocaine/

Dibucaine Task Force, May 25, 1994.

22. McClenahan, W., Fatal Poisoning with

Dibucaine Hydrochloride (Nuporal)

Lozenges, Journal of American Medical

Association, 158(7), 565, 1955.

23. Memorandum from Terry L. Kissinger,

EPHA, ‘‘Response to Comments and analysis

of Available Data Regarding Child-resistant

Packaging for Topical Anesthetics Containing

Lidocaine or Dibucaine,’’ April 29, 1994.

24. Memorandum from Susan C. Aitken,

Ph.D., HSPS, ‘‘Health Sciences Staff

Responses to Comments on Proposed

Packaging Standards for Lidocaine and

Dibucaine,’’ July 19, 1994.

25. Memorandum from Terry L. Kissinger,

EPHA, ‘‘Recent Death Involving Ingestion of

a Dibucaine-Containing Product,’’ July 27,

1994.

26. Memorandum from Charles J. Wilbur,

HSPS, ‘‘PPPA Final Rule Lidocaine and

Dibucaine Technical Feasibility,

Practicability, and Appropriateness,’’ July,

1994.

27. Memorandum from Marcia P. Robins,

ECSS, ‘‘Final Economic Assessments:

Proposal to Require Child-resistant Packaging

for Topical Anesthetics Containing Lidocaine

or Dibucaine,’’ June 15, 1994, (and telephone

conversation 10/1/93).

28. Letter from Vincent De Stefano (Ciba

Consumer Pharmaceuticals) to Ann Brown,

June 10, 1994.

29. Poison Control Centers Toxic Exposure

Surveillance System, 1992.

30. Wilbur, Charles J., Laboratory Report,

form 221, Non-CR Finger Mechanical Pump

Spray with Overcap, 2 fl. oz., S–400–0802,

CPSC, August 2, 1994 (Confidential).

31. Memorandum to file, Mike Gidding,

CEAL, ‘‘Memorandum of visit to Teledyne

Corporation,’’ August 4, 1994.

32. Letter from Andrew S. Krulwich and

Julie Jacobs, counsel to Combe, Inc., to Eric

A. Rubel, General Counsel, in support of

exemption for OTC topical lidocaine

preparations, September 8, 1994.

33. Memorandum from Suzanne Barone,

HS, to the Commission, ‘‘Supplemental

Information on Lidocaine and Dibucaine,’’

September 9, 1994.

34. Vote sheet from the Office of the

General Counsel to the Commission, with

revised Federal Register notice, September 9,

1994.

35. Log of meeting and attached material

submitted by a manufacturer—FOR

OFFICIAL USE ONLY.

36. Letter from John B. Dubeck, Keller and

Heckman, on behalf of Pound International,

Inc., September 12, 1994.

37. Letter from Jeffrey C. Minnette,

Sunbeam Plastics, September 16, 1994.

38. Memorandum from Marcia Robins,

ECSS, to Suzanne Barone, Ph.D., Project

Manager, HS, ‘‘Lidocaine/Dibucaine’’ (about

share of revenue for lidocaine in tubes for

three small companies), September 19, 1994.

39. Letter from Andrew S. Krulwich and

Julie Jacobs, Wiley, Rein & Fielding, on

behalf of Combe, Inc., September 20, 1994.

40. Tape recordings of Commission

briefing on September 21, 1994 (portion

containing discussion of confidential data is

for official use only).

41. Letter from John Dubeck, Keller and

Heckman, representing Pound International,

September 26, 1994 (non-confidential

version).

42. Additional data from AAPCC,

September 27, 1994.

43. Revised draft Federal Register notice,

September 27, 1994.

44. Tape recording of Commission meeting

on September 28, 1994.

45. Separate statements of the

Commissioners.

[FR Doc. 95–8628 Filed 4–7–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6335–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

32 CFR Part 290

Defense Contract Audit Agency

(DCAA) Freedom of Information Act

Program

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary of

Defense, DoD.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: This administrative

amendment is published to inform

potential FOIA requestors of the

geographical coverage of Wyoming from

the Western region to the Central region

as part of its reorganization. This part

also authorizes the ‘‘DCAA Label 4’’

(For official use only coversheet).

EFFECTIVE DATE: (April 10, 1950).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Dave Henshall, Attn: CMR, Defense

Contract Audit Agency, Cameron

Station, Alexandria, VA 22304–6168,

telephone 703–274-4400.

List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 290

Freedom of information.

Accordingly, 32 CFR Part 290 is

amended as follows:
18006 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 68 / Monday, April 10, 1995 / Rules and Regulations

PART 290—DEFENSE CONTRACT

AUDIT AGENCY (DCAA) FREEDOM OF

INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM

1. The authority citation of part 290

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552.

2. Appendix B to part 290 is amended

as follows:

a. Regional office CALIFORNIA is

amended after ‘‘Oregon’’ by adding the

word ‘‘and’’, and after ‘‘Washington’’ by

removing the words, ‘‘and Wyoming.’’

b. Regional office TEXAS is amended

after ‘‘Wisconsin’’ by adding the state

‘‘Wyoming’’.

3. Appendix C to part 290 is amended

by adding new paragraph (c)(3) to read

as follows:

Appendix C to Part 290—For Official

Use Only

* * * * *

(c) * * *

(3) DCAA Label 4, FOUO Cover Sheet.

This form may be used to further

identify FOUO information.

* * * * *

Dated: April 3, 1995.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison

Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 95–8652 Filed 4–7–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5000–04–M

32 CFR Parts 354, 355, 357, 359, 360,

361, and 374

Organizational Charters; Removal of

Parts

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, DoD.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense

hereby removes obsolete parts

concerning organizational charters

within the Department of Defense from

title 32 of the Code of Federal

Regulations. These organizations are

specifically identified as Under

Secretary of Defense for Policy (DoD

Directive 5111.1); Principal Deputy

Under Secretary of Defense for Policy

(DoD Directive 5111.3); Assistant

Secretary of Defense for Nuclear

Security and Counterproliferation (DoD

Directive 5111.5); Assistant Secretary of

Defense for International Security

Affairs (DoD Directive 5111.7); Assistant

Secretary of Defense for Strategy,

Requirements, and Resources (DoD

Directive 5111.8); Director of Net

Assessment (DoD Directive 5111.9); and

Assistant Secretary of Defense for

Special Operations and Low-Intensity

Conflict (DoD Directive 5138.3). These

parts have served the purpose for which

they were intended and are no longer

valid.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 22, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: L.M.

Bynum, Correspondence and Directives

Directorate, 1155 Defense Pentagon,

Washington, DC 20301–1155.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

List of Subjects in 32 CFR Parts 354,

355, 357, 359, 360, 361, and 374

Organization and functions

(Government agencies).

PARTS—[REMOVED]

Accordingly, by the authority of 10

U.S.C. 131, 32 CFR parts 354, 355, 357,

359, 360, 361, and 374 are removed.

Dated: April 3, 1995.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison

Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 95–8653 Filed 4–7–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5000–04–M

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[CGD09–95–004]

Drawbridge Operation Regulations;

Chicago River, IL

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of revised temporary

deviation.

SUMMARY: The Commander, Ninth Coast

Guard District, has revised the bridge

opening schedule for the authorized 90-

day deviation from the operation

regulations for the draws of City of

Chicago-owned bridges over the Chicago

River, Illinois. The deviation is being

revised based on all available

information, including information and

comments presented at the public

hearing held on Thursday, March 9,

1995. The revised deviation will

provide for daylight weekend openings,

and weekday daylight and evening

openings on Tuesdays and Thursdays

during the Spring breakout period.

DATES: The deviation will be effective

from April 15, 1995, through July 13,

1995, unless sooner terminated by the

District Commander. Comments on the

impacts of the deviation must be

received by June 9, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Comments on the deviation

may be mailed to Mr. Robert Bloom,

Chief, Bridge Branch, Ninth Coast Guard

District, 1240 East Ninth Street,

Cleveland, Ohio. The public docket will

be available for inspection or copying in

room 2083D, at the above address

between 8 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday

through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.

Robert W. Bloom, Jr., Chief, Bridge

Branch, Ninth Coast Guard District,

(216) 522–3993.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Drafting Information

The principal persons involved in

drafting this document are Robert

Bloom, Chief, Bridge Branch, and

Commander James Collin, District Legal

Officer, Ninth Coast Guard District.

Background and Purpose

Regulations governing the operation

of drawbridges are promulgated under

the authority of 33 U.S.C. 499. As

amended in 1988, the statute provides

that any rules and regulations made in

pursuance of this section shall, to the

extent practical and feasible, provide for

regularly scheduled openings of

drawbridges during seasons of the year,

and during times of the day, when

scheduled openings would help reduce

motor vehicle traffic delays and

congestion on roads and highways

linked by drawbridges.

Following notice and comment

rulemaking, the Coast Guard

promulgated a final rule on April 18,

1994, establishing a new rule for

drawbridge operations on the Chicago

River. On September 26, 1994, the

United States District Court for the

District of Columbia issued an order in

the case of Crowley’s Yacht Yard, Inc.,

Plaintiff, v. Federico Pen ̃ a, Secretary,

United States Department of

Transportation, Defendant, (C.A. No.

94–1152 SSH), rescinding the Final Rule

published on April 18, 1994, and

reinstating the previous regulations

found at 33 CFR 117.391. The

regulations reinstated by the District

Court provided for on-demand openings

of drawbridges except during rush hour

periods.

Further, those regulations contained

no requirement for advance notice or

the use of specified recreational vessel

flotilla size. As a result of the Court

decision and to gather data for future

use, in the Fall of 1994, the District

Commander issued a temporary

deviation to regulations for the period

October 11, 1994 through December 5,

1994, with a comment period through

January 15, 1995. The deviation

provided openings of bridges, with a

twenty-four hour advance notice to the

City of Chicago, from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m.

on Saturdays and Sundays, and on

Wednesdays between the hours of 6:30