alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6796

Omron Management Center of America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-7467

Nissan North America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
<PAGE>   1


                                                                  Exhibit 10(17)

                            CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION
                                       OF
                         STRATOSPHERE LITIGATION, L.L.C.


     The undersigned, an authorized natural person, for the purpose of forming a
limited liability company under the provisions and subject to the requirements
of the State of Delaware (particularly Chapter 18, Title 6 of the Delaware Code
and the acts amendatory thereof and supplemental thereto, and known, identified,
and referred to as the "Delaware Limited Liability Company Act"), hereby
certifies that:

     FIRST: The name of the limited liability company (hereinafter called the
"limited liability company") is Stratosphere Litigation, L.L.C.

     SECOND: The address of the registered office and the name and the address
of the registered agent for service of process of the limited liability company
required to be maintained by Section 18-104 of the Delaware Limited Liability
Company Act are The Corporation Trust Company, 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington,
County of Newcastle, Delaware 19801.

Executed on October   , 1998.





                                        ____________________________________
                                        Thomas A. Lettero, Authorized Person

STATE OF NEVADA               )
                              )        ss.
COUNTY OF CLARK               )

     This instrument was acknowledged before me on October   , 1998 by Thomas A.
Lettero on behalf of Stratosphere Litigation, L.L.C.



                                        ____________________________________
                                        Notary Public
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION




OF




CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER




AND




CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER




PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I,
Richard Man Fai LEE, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q/A of China Premium Lifestyle Enterprise, Inc. for the quarter ended
September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of China Premium Lifestyle
Enterprise, Inc.




I, Joseph
Tik Tung WONG, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q/A of China Premium Lifestyle Enterprise, Inc. for the quarter ended
September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of China Premium Lifestyle
Enterprise, Inc.




May
      28, 2010
              By:/s/ Richard Man Fai LEERichard
      Man Fai LEEChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)May
      28, 2010
              By:/s/ Joseph Tik Tung WONGJoseph
      Tik Tung WONGChief
      Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary(Principal
      Financial and Accounting
Officer)




This
certification accompanies the Form 10-Q/A to which it relates, is not
deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of China Premium Lifestyle Enterprise,
Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the
Form 10-Q/A), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained
in such filing.
#### Bruce FRITZ, Respondent, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, State of Missouri, Appellant.

No. WD 50251.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Oct. 24, 1995.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Theresa J. Miller, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Mo. Dept, of Revenue, Jefferson City, for appellant.

Thomas R. Bellman, Kansas City, for respondent.

Before SPINDEN, P.J., and BRECKENRIDGE and SMART, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

The Director of Revenue appeals the order of the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, reinstating the driving privilege of Bruce Fritz. Mr. Fritz’s license was revoked upon his refusal to submit to chemical testing pursuant to § 577.041, RSMo 1994.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 7583** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.
DAN GATLIN , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence

. Terry L. Wooten , Chief District Judge. ( 4:10

- cr - 00203

- TLW

- 1 )

Submitted : February 9, 2016 Decided: February 22, 2016

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Dan Gatlin, Appellant Pro Se. Carrie Fisher Sherard, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Dan Gatlin appeals the district cou rt ’s order granting him
a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). ∗ We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Gatlin’s motion to appoint counsel and
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United
States v. Gatlin , No. 4:10

- cr - 00203

- TLW

- 1 (D.S.C. Sept. 22,
201 5 ; Oct. 8, 2015). We grant in part and deny in part Gatlin’s motion to seal his informal brief on appeal by sealing pages 4,
5, and 9

- 11 of the brief but not sealing the remaining pages. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

∗ Gatlin challenges the extent of the reduction.
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In re: Petition of the Board of School :

Directors of the Hatboro-Horsham :

School District for the Sale of Real :

Property : No. 1001 C.D. 2022

:

Appeal of: Peggy Ambler and John :

Ambler :

PER CURIAM O R D E R

NOW, January 23, 2024, having considered Appellants’ application for 

reargument and Appellee’s answer in response thereto, the application is DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5247 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5247

To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the authority of the 
          Secretary of Veterans Affairs to hire psychiatrists.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 22, 2023

  Mr. Cartwright (for himself, Mr. Amodei, Mr. Connolly, Ms. Kelly of 
    Illinois, Mr. McGovern, Mr. Peters, Ms. Titus, and Mr. Moylan) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the authority of the 
          Secretary of Veterans Affairs to hire psychiatrists.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Expedited Hiring for VA Trained 
Psychiatrists Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. APPOINTMENT OF PSYCHIATRISTS BY VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 74 of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended by inserting after section 7406 the following new section:
``Sec. 7406A. Appointment of certain psychiatrists who complete 
              residencies
    ``(a) In General.--(1) Subject to subsection (b), the Secretary may 
appoint, without regard to civil service or classification laws, a 
psychiatrist who completes a residency under section 7406 of this title 
to a position under section 7401 or 7405 immediately after such 
residency, if the psychiatrist meets the qualifications established in 
regulations prescribed by the Secretary for such position.
    ``(2) The Secretary may begin the process of appointing a 
psychiatrist under paragraph (1) before the psychiatrist completes a 
residency.
    ``(b) Positions Permitted.--The Secretary may appoint a 
psychiatrist under subsection (a) if the position to which the 
psychiatrist is appointed has been unfilled for not less than 35 days 
as of the date of the appointment.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 
7406 the following new item:

``7406A. Appointment of certain psychiatrists who complete 
                            residencies.''.
                                 <all>
```
Presidential Documents

19153

Federal Register

Vol. 60, No. 73

Monday, April 17, 1995

Title 3—

The President

Memorandum of April 4, 1995

Delegation of Authority Under Section 106 of the International Narcotics Control Corrections Act of 1994 (Public

Law 103–447)

Memorandum for the Secretary of State

By the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United

States of America, including section 301 of title 3 of the United States

Code, I hereby delegate to the Secretary of State the functions conferred

upon the President by section 106 of the International Narcotics Control

Corrections Act of 1994 (the ‘‘Act’’) (Public Law 103–447) with respect

to funds made available from any source.

The functions delegated by this memorandum may be redelegated to the

extent permitted by law.

This delegation of authority shall also apply to any amendments or successor

legislation concerning the subject matter of this section.

You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal

[FR Doc. 95–9553

Register.

THE WHITE HOUSE,

Washington, April 4, 1995.

œ–

Filed 4–13–95; 3:23 pm]

Billing code 4710–10–M
5(&200(1'(' )25 )8//

3XUVXDQW WR 6L[WK &LUF

(/(&7521,& &,7$7,21  )

)LOH 1DPH D

	


	





1,7(' 	7$7(6 2) 0(5,&$

	






,7$ 1'5(:6



,//(56 +,/'5(16

33$5(/



	



 !"
#$!%	!

!"&!#'$&!$(!

+,--./"#$0

	)1 $!!%2$

'($%%#%$%2/

627'8	
9#%

/)%*&
3 
	 






 
  9!! $ :$! 
99	
9'	 ::9 '!$! $("$*#  &	"$%# ; < # 9= > 9=	)!"$%$("$*#







	
9 $()$! /)%*  '#%#! $& "$%#&

?@$&"$%#&AB&!"C)%* #!*$#&!$! $#  *#$&" #! (%$#*  $& "$%#& $& !"*#$&"  !" $ C)%* #! %1! #% $#($%#%#!$!#%D&EF&#% #%

	


#%D& G()!% !D  $&&5 #!& )#% #

*)#!* &)!"$<%)#%!"$*"%)(!$#(!-,3+
	HH+,,$#!"!! )#!I,+++E"#&"%)!%#!"&#!&!"
#$!%	!!&$#$!$!% # (!$# *$#&! " $# !" &!# '$&!$(! $("$*##%1!$#%%)!C)%* #!$#!" )#!I,33,  
# !" ()&   ((!$# $#F&!$*!$#	"$%#< #()#&!"
#$!%	!!&1!$#%#!$(!$#%D%D&#D"$(""$#%$(!%!"!#%D&D&D&J&&)&#%!"!&""%1# 5% 15 $& "$%#&  %%$!$#5 !"$& #!$(!$#%&$*#!%9!!$&#($#(&#  *#(5  < # & 1!$#%  (5  !!D"$("&!"F1#D$!!#15$$#%$(!$#*!"!#%D&D&# 5$&"$%#&

"
#$!%	!!&1!$#%D$!*#$&" #!*$#&!

$& "$%#& & !" *#$&"%#%#! D"$(" D&&F%)#$&"$%#&"D$!K)$%!"!$&
 

"$%#&&#%$#D$!$#*#%!#%5&D"!"$!"%$#$!&()&!#5 !5 D#% 15 #%DK)$% $& "$%#& ! $(0!"%%$&!$(!()!$#D"5 $%! &#%!!"$&D$%  !$!$#  C)%* #! *#%D&"$&!$!$#$#()%%D&&("%)%#'( 133"F$#*($F%#&#& %! $#%!"!"$#*D&#!
#$!% 	!!& !   D$#*!"!$#!"$&$&"$%#&!"()!#!"$%#&#%!"$&D%




$&"$%#&&&!&!"!$!

D$#!"!$!($F%##!$( C)%* #! $# F$!$#  :(%)3,()&)3,"$#*&!"(&D&&!$$#%$&
#$!%	!!&&#%&!"!$!)5F$&$#&  % )  $K)$&!"!@D$!!# !$#!"&"1&F%#!!!"&($$%!""$#*MNA%!"! #* D$!"$!& !$# C)$#()%%(!$$(!&F$($#%&F% 15 $&! (&& $ #%%$!$#5 !" ()! F$%% $&"$%#&15 $$#*!" # '( 1 4 4  " "'( 1334O!")&$&#!$(!" !$#)#%)-?K)$ #!%)(&&D& 

"C)%* #!D&#%%)#%

!"
#$!%	!!&!(FC)
 
	 


	 H L++?B?B  
#% !"$& &!!)!5 (%) $#)&)$#*&!C)%* #!*#$&" #!!"*#$&" )&!&#%!D$!*#$&" #!C)&!&$&"$%#&D&%%!%$#!"$&(&34
	HL3+,?(B?B"$&#!$ $ $!!$#$#!"&!!)!!"$&&#&1)!$#!"$&(&!"*#$&"D&*$F## $F #!"&$#D"$("! &#%  " 
#$!% 	!!& *)& !"!  *#$&"J&$)! ( 5 D$!"  D$! #1&!" 
#$!% 	!!&!!$!$# !" ()!  C)%* #! *$#&! !" *#$&"DF !" (%) F$%% 15 !" &!!)! (!)5D&!"
#$!% 	!!&!!$!$#!" ()!  #%K)$$#*!"*#$&"!2

P#$&"Q& $)!#&D5
*#$&"

$&!#&D!"D$!*#$&" #!!D$!""%!5$#((%#(D$!"!"D$!!"
#$!%	!!& 5 !$!$# !" ()!  # % K)$$#* !"*#$&"!1!"()!!#&D!"D$!#%!&D$!""%!51!"#(%!
!"*#$&"$&!&#%$&!&"D *% ()& D"5 !" *#$&" $% ! ( 5D$!"!"D$!!"()!&"#!C)%* #!*$#&!!"*#$&"  !" F)  !" C)%* #! %1!Q&##G ! $#!&! $# &)(" !5 ?$#()%$#*##G !%$&&1#$#*&B"()! 5D%!!#5Q&!!"
#$!%	!!&#%*$#&!!"*#$&"$!"D$!$&#!#&D%D$!"$#!"!$ &($$%!"$##%!$!$#K)$$#*!"*#$&"!$&$%&F$%%$#!"$&&(!$#

34
	HL3+,?(B?-B

!")*"!"$&&)$&#!$&%15$!"!5!"()!

%$##!$#*!"C)%* #!D$!")!"%$#*"$#*!D$&"$%#&!
#&!%!$!$#$#*!"()!#%K)$$#*$&"$%#&!!"
#$!%	!!&!$!$#%#%C)%* #!D"$("D&*#!%D$!")!"$#*"$&$&$#K)$!1%)!!"(#!#!&  # !!(" #! ! !" 5 1$  $&"$%#&"$&!!(" #!$&!!)!%5D$!!#15

 #%D&D"$("&!!&!"!&"$D"# &" $#%$(!% !"! &" D"$%#&"!!&&!!&!0#D%*!"$&&&&!$#$#()%&#%%&&#%D&$#!"!!$&!)$&"$%#%D&#%!"C)%* #!*$#&!!"$& !!$& #%%!"%$&!K)$$#* !" *#$&" ! HL3+,?(B?-B#%!"%!"!"$&$#$#

;	'''
J-S50033-14

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF 

PENNSYLVANIA 

 Appellee 

v.

CHARLES STEPHON WILLIAMS, 

 Appellant No. 350 WDA 2014 

Appeal from the Order entered February 6, 2014,

in the Court of Common Pleas of Erie County, 

Criminal Division, at No(s): CP-25-CR-0000251-1996 

BEFORE: FORD ELLIOTT, P.J.E., SHOGAN, and ALLEN, JJ. 

JUDGMENT ORDER BY ALLEN, J.: FILED AUGUST 11, 2014 

 In this pro se appeal, Charles Stephon Williams (“Appellant”) appeals

from the order denying his request for post-conviction DNA testing under 

section 9543.1 of the Post-Conviction Relief Act (“PCRA”). 

In Appellant’s previous appeal, this Court concluded that “the language 

of § 9543.1 clearly precludes that section’s application to petitioners seeking 

to challenge convictions resulting in guilty pleas by reference to DNA 

evidence.” Williams v. Erie County Dist. Atty’s Office, 848 A.2d 967, 

972 (Pa. Super. 2004), appeal denied, 864 A.2d 530 (Pa. 2004). Thus, 

because this Court previously concluded that Appellant’s guilty plea prevents 

him from seeking relief based on DNA evidence, the PCRA court properly 

denied Appellant’s request. See Commonwealth v. Gacobano, 65 A.3d 

416, 419-20 (Pa. Super. 2013) (applying “law of the case” doctrine to 
J-S50033-14

- 2 - 

second request for DNA testing, when this Court in a previous appeal 

affirmed the PCRA court’s denial of the appellant’s section 9543.1 motion).

 Order affirmed. 

Judgment Entered. 

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. 

Prothonotary 

Date: 8/11/2014
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-6739

MAHLE Engine Components USA, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 69 (Tuesday, April 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18437-18438]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8942]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration
[Summary Notice No. PE-95-15]


Petitions for Exemption; Summary of Petitions Received; 
Dispositions of Petitions Issued

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of petitions for exemption received and of dispositions 
of prior petitions.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to FAA's rulemaking provisions governing the 
application, processing, and disposition of petitions for exemption (14 
CFR Part 11), this notice contains a summary of certain petitions 
seeking relief from specified requirements of the Federal Aviation 
Regulations (14 CFR Chapter I), dispositions of certain petitions 
previously received, and corrections. The purpose of this notice is to 
improve the public's awareness of, and participation in, this aspect of 
FAA's regulatory activities. Neither publication of this notice nor the 
inclusion or omission of information in the summary is intended to 
affect the legal status of any petition or its final disposition.

DATE: Comments on petitions received must identify the petition docket 
number involved and must be received on or before April 21, 1995.

ADDRESS: Send comments on any petition in triplicate to: Federal 
Aviation Administration, Office of the Chief Counsel, Attn: Rule Docket 
(AGC-200), Petition Docket No. 28183, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., 
Washington, DC 20591.
    The petition, any comments received, and a copy of any final 
disposition are filed in the assigned regulatory docket and are 
available for examination in the [[Page 18438]] Rules Docket (AGC-200), 
Room 915G, FAA Headquarters Building (FOB 10A), 800 Independence 
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202) 267-3132.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. D. Michael Smith, Office of Rulemaking (ARM-1), Federal Aviation 
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; 
telephone (202) 267-7470.
    This notice is published pursuant to paragraphs (c), (e), and (g) 
of Sec. 11.27 of Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 
Part 11).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on April 6, 1995.
Donald P. Byrne,
Assistant Chief Counsel for Regulations.

Petitions for Exemption

    Docket No.: 28183.
    Petitioner: United Airlines, Inc.
    Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 121.291.
    Description of Relief Sought: To allow B777 full-scale ditching 
certification without the requirement to construct stands at each exit, 
and to allow the full-scale ditching demonstration to be completed by 
launching and inflating a single slideraft.

[FR Doc. 95-8942 Filed 4-7-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M