alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 27, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 129413 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 129413 COA: 250008 Oakland CC: 2002-187112-FC CESAR GARCIA HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to appeal the Ju ly 26, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d1219 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 27, 2005

Clerk
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

RONALD G. CLETCHER,

Appellant,

v.

SHERRI A. CLETCHER,

Appellee.

No. 2D23-666

April 12, 2024

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; Daniel Diskey, Judge.

Paul H. Bowen of Paul H. Bowen, P.A., Palm Harbor, for Appellant.

Mark F. Baseman of Felix, Felix & Baseman, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

SLEET, C.J., and LUCAS and LABRIT, JJ., Concur. 

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
**EXHIBIT 32.01**

 

**Section 1350Certification**

 

In connection with this quarterly report of ML Winton FuturesAccess LLC(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I,Justin C. Ferri, Chief Executive Officer, President and Manager of MerrillLynch Alternative Investments LLC, the manager of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Date:August 13, 2010

 

 
| By                                              | /s/  JUSTIN C. FERRI |   |
|-------------------------------------------------|----------------------|--------|
| Justin  C. Ferri                                |
| Chief  Executive Officer, President and Manager |
| (Principal  Executive Officer)                  |

 

----
Order entered November 17, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 15
- 01369
- CV MICHAEL D. WILSON, Appellant

V. WOODLAND HILLS APART MENT, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC
- 15
- 04980
- C



### O RDER
B e fore the Court is appellant’s November 16, 2015 motion for leave to proceed as indigent, filed concurrently with an affidavit of indigence

. Because the rules of appellate procedure afford the trial court clerk, cou rt reporter, and parties to the appeal an opportunity to contest the affidavit, and only one day has passed since the affidavit was filed, we DENY appellant’s motion without prejudice to refiling should his affidavit be contested and the contest sustained by the trial court. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 20.1(e), (j).

/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Universal Capital Management, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended January 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph T. Drennan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Joseph T. Drennan

Joseph T. Drennan

Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

March 24, 2008
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5269

Arrowhead Electrical Products, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6400

LiuGong Construction Machinery North America, LLC:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_05.09.19.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information primarily extracted
from AT&T Capital Corporation's audited consolidated income statement and
balance sheet for and at the year ended December 31, 1995 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                           1,000
       
<S>                                    <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                           DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          YEAR
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                            (168,986)
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0<F2>
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                          (777,905)<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         8,092,512
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0<F2>
<BONDS>                                4,597,677
<COMMON>                                     902
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                               706,405
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           8,092,512<F3>
<SALES>                                   90,631
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       1,952,190
<CGS>                                     78,538
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            534,133
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         113,605
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       458,039
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          278,602
<INCOME-TAX>                             110,063
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      168,539
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                             168,539
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        
<FN>
*    In accordance with Regulation S-K item 601 (c) 2, inapplicable or
     immaterial financial data is reflected as zero value.

<F1> Accumulated depreciation relates to equipment under operating leases.

<F2> This item is not applicable since the Company does not prepare a
     classified balance sheet.

<F3> Includes Company-obligated preferred securities of $200,000.
</FN>


<PAGE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 67 (Friday, April 7, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17824-17825]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8631]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND HUMANITIES


Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting of 
the International Advisory Panel (International Fellowships and 
Residencies Prescreening Section) to the National Council on the Arts 
will be held on April 25-27, 1995 from 9:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on April 
25-26 and from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on April 27. This meeting will be 
held in Room 716, at the Nancy Hanks Center, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, 
N.W., Washington, D.C. 20506.
    Portions of this meeting will be open to the public from 9:00 a.m 
to 9:30 a.m. on April 25 and from 3:30 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. on April 27, 
for a policy discussion.
    The remaining portions of this meeting from 9:30 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. 
on April 25; from 9:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on April 26; and from 9:00 
a.m. to 3:30 p.m. on April 27 are for the purpose of Panel review, 
discussion, evaluation, and recommendation on applications for 
financial assistance under the National Foundation on the Arts and the 
Humanities Act of 1965, as amended, including information given in 
confidence to the agency by grant applicants. In accordance with the 
determination of the Chairman of February 8, 1994 these sessions will 
be closed to the public pursuant to subsection (c)(4), (6) and (9)(B) 
of section 552b of Title 5, United States Code.
    Any person may observe meetings, or portions thereof, of advisory 
panels which are open to the public, and may be permitted to 
participate in the [[Page 17825]] panel's discussions at the discretion 
of the panel chairman and with the approval of the full-time Federal 
employee in attendance.
    If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please 
contact the Office of Special Constituencies, National Endowment for 
the Arts, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20506, 202/
682-5532, TYY 202/682-5496, at least seven (7) days prior to the 
meeting.
    Further information with reference to this meeting can be obtained 
from Ms. Yvonne Sabine, Committee Management Officer, National 
Endowment for the Arts, Washington, D.C. 20506, or call 202/682-5433.

    Dated: April 4, 1995.
Yvonne M. Sabine,
Director, Office of Council and Panel Operations, National Endowment 
for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 95-8631 Filed 4-6-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 73 (Monday, April 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19238-19239]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9427]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Financial Assistance Award: Don Curchod

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy announces that pursuant to 10 
CFR 600.6(a)(2) it is making a financial assistance award under Grant 
Number DE-FG01-95EE15615 to Don Curchod. The proposed grant will 
provide funding in the estimated amount of $94,000 by the Department of 
Energy to further develop the ``Energy Efficient Skylight (SEAlight)'' 
technology, a patented device for controlling the light and heat 
entering a building through a window or skylight. This award will be 
made 14 calendar days after publication to allow for public comment.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department of Energy has determined in 
accordance with 10 CFR 600.14(e)(1) that the unsolicited application 
for financial assistance submitted by Don Curchod is meritorious based 
on the general evaluation required by 10 CFR 600.14(d) and the proposed 
project represents a unique idea that would not be eligible for 
financial assistance under a recent, current or planned solicitation. 
The SEAlight provides an inexpensive and effective method for 
controlling solar heat gain and daylighting in both new and existing 
windows and roof-top skylights. Through a novel application of 
reflective materials, the technology permits the entry of sunlight 
through windows and skylights during winter and reflects insolation in 
summer, reducing radiative heat gains during the cooling season. It has 
applications in both commercial and residential buildings.
    The proposed project is not eligible for financial assistance under 
a recent, current or planned solicitation because the funding program, 
the Energy Related Invention Program (ERIP), has been structured since 
its beginning in 1975 to operate without competitive solicitations 
because the authorizing [[Page 19239]] legislation directs ERIP to 
provide support for worthy ideas submitted by the public. The program 
has never issued and has no plans to issue a competitive solicitation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Please write the U.S. Department of 
Energy, Office of Placement and Administration, Attn: Rose Mason, HR-
531.21, 1000 Independence Ave., S.W., Washington, D.C. 20585.
    The anticipated term of the proposed grant is 18 months from the 
date of award.

    Issued in Washington, D.C. on April 6, 1995.
Lynn Warner,
Contracting Officer, Office of Placement and Administration.
[FR Doc. 95-9427 Filed 4-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
#### Virginia ROBERTS, et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. Mark OBREMSKI, Defendant/Respondent.

No. 53976.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

Dec. 13, 1988.

*292Richard J. Hughes, St. Louis, for plaintiffs/appellants.

Paul E. Kovacs & James C. Thoele, Clayton, for defendant/respondent.

SMITH, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment based upon a jury verdict in favor of defendant in this skate and fall case. Plaintiff wife sued for her injuries and her husband sued for loss of consortium. We affirm.

Plaintiff wife was roller skating as part of a trio when she and the two others decided to leave the rink. As she was waiting to leave the rink, she was struck by an eleven year old girl skating in trio with defendant and another. Plaintiff sustained a fractured wrist when she fell after the collision. On appeal she raises only the contention that defendant’s comparative fault instruction was erroneous in hypothesizing one of two grounds as negligence.

The verdict of the jury here specifically assessed defendant’s fault at 0% and that of plaintiff at 100%. Plaintiffs’ verdict directing instruction began “In your verdict you must assess a percentage of fault to defendant Mark Obremski, *whether or not plaintiff Virginia Roberts was partly*at *fault,*if you believe_” (Emphasis supplied). Defendant’s converse instruction provided: “In your verdict on the claim of plaintiff Virginia Roberts you must not assess a percentage of fault to Mark Obrem-ski unless you believe defendant Mark Obremski was negligent....”

We assume that a jury reads and follows all instructions. Where a jury, instructed as here by plaintiff’s verdict-director, finds no fault on the part of defendant, an error in the comparative fault instruction is non-prejudicial as it is presumed the jury never reached the issue of plaintiff’s fault. The reference to plaintiff’s fault in the verdict “is not necessary to the general verdict and may be disregarded as surplusage.” *Barnes v. Tools & Machinery Builders, Inc.,*715 S.W.2d 518 (Mo.banc 1986) [2,3]; *Koch v. Bangert Bros. Road Builders, Inc.,*697 S.W.2d 315 (Mo.App.1985). We need not therefore reach plaintiff’s contention of error in the instruction.

Judgment affirmed.

STEPHAN and SATZ, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 62 (Friday, March 31, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 16654]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7745]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Office of the Secretary


Agency Forms Submitted to the Office of Management and Budget for 
Clearance

    On Fridays, the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of 
the Secretary publishes a list of information collections it has 
submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance in 
compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). The 
following are those information collections recently submitted to OMB.
    1. Hill-Burton Community Service Assurance Report--Extension with 
No Change--0990-0096--The Community Service Assurance Report provides 
information on community services provided by Hill-Burton recipients. 
The Public Health Service Act (Titles VI and XVI) requires that this 
information be obtained periodically to enable assessment of the 
compliance of recipient Hill-Burton health facilities with their 
community services assurances. Respondents: State or local governments, 
non-profit institutions; Total Number of Respondents: 6,300; Frequency 
of Response: once every three years; Average Burden per Response: 52.5 
hours; Estimated Annual Burden: 110,250 hours.
    OMB Desk Officer: Allison Eydt.
    Copies of the information collection packages listed above can be 
obtained by calling the OS Reports Clearance Officer on (202) 619-1053. 
Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent directly to the OMB desk officer designated 
above at the following address: OMB Reports Management Branch, New 
Executive Office Building, Room 3208, Washington, D.C. 20503.

    Dated: March 21, 1995.
Dennis P. Williams,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Budget.
[FR Doc. 95-7745 Filed 3-30-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-04-M
Exhibit 32.2


SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal Procedures) of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.


The undersigned, who is the Chief Financial Officer of Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT I, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies to her knowledge:


The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company (the “Report”), which accompanies this Certificate, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 10th day of August, 2016.





/s/ LISA ROSS


Lisa Ross


Chief Financial Officer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6015

Dallas Airmotive, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel