alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered October 27 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 15

- 00895

- CR No. 05

- 15

- 00896

- CR
JAMES JOSEPH ASHBY, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1

Dallas Co unty, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F06

- 01322

- H , F06

- 68733

- H



### O RDER

The Court ORDERS the trial court to make findings of fact regarding whether appellant has been deprived of the reporter’s record because of ineffective counsel, indigence, or for any

other reason.

 The trial court shall first determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal s . If the trial court determines that appellant does not desire to prosecute the appeal s , it shall make a finding to that effect.

 If the trial court determine s that appellant desires to prosecute the appeal s , it shall next determine whether appellant is indigent and entitled to proceed without payment of costs for the reporter’s record. If appellant is entitled to proceed without payment of costs, the trial co urt shall make a finding to that effect. Moreover, if appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel. If the trial court finds
a ppellant is not indigent, it shall determine whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal s

. The trial court shall next determine: (1) the name and address of each court reporter who

recorded the proceedings in this cause; (2) the court reporter’s ex planation for the delay in filing the reporter’s record; and (3) the earliest date by which the reporter’s record can be filed.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record, containing the written findings of fact, any supporting documentation, and any orders, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date
of this order. The appeal s are ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The appeal s shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received,
which ever is earlier.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
#### People v Penny Boland, Defendant.

Motion to extend time to take appeal granted upon condition that a notice of appeal is filed and served on or before July 23, 1990. Memorandum: Counsel’s failure to comply with 22 NYCRR 1022.11 (a) constitutes "improper conduct” of counsel (CPL 460.30 [1] [a]; *People v Storms,*161 AD2d 1215). Present— Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 4, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 464]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-92]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Dkt C-3544]


Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corporation; Prohibited Trade Practices, 
and Affirmative Corrective Actions

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION: Consent order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In settlement of alleged violations of federal law prohibiting 
unfair acts and practices and unfair methods of competition, this 
consent order permits, among other things, the hospital company to 
complete its acquisition of Medical Care America, but requires it to 
divest the Alaska Surgery Center within twelve months to a Commission-
approved entity. If the transaction is not completed in the designated 
time frame, the respondents are required to permit the Commission to 
appoint a trustee. In addition, the consent order requires the 
respondent, for ten years, to obtain Commission approval before 
acquiring an interest worth more than $1 million in any outpatient 
surgical services facility in Anchorage, Alaska, and before selling 
such an interest to any entity that operates an outpatient surgical 
services facility in Anchorage, Alaska.

DATES: Complaint and Order issued December 6, 1994.<SUP>1

    \1\Copies of the Complaint and the Decision and Order are 
available from the Commission's Public Reference Branch, H-130, 6th 
Street & Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20580.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark Horoschak, FTC/S-3115, Washington, DC 20580, (202) 326-2756.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On Friday, September 23, 1994, there was 
published in the Federal Register, 59 FR 48883, a proposed consent 
agreement with analysis In the Matter of Columbia/HCA Healthcare 
Corporation, for the purpose of soliciting public comment. Interested 
parties were given sixty (60) days in which to submit comments, 
suggestions or objections regarding the proposed form of the order.
    No comments having been received, the Commission has ordered the 
issuance of the complaint in the form contemplated by the agreement, 
made its jurisdictional findings and entered an order to divest, as set 
forth in the proposed consent agreement, in disposition of this 
proceeding.

(Sec. 6, 38 Stat. 721; 15 U.S.C. 46. Interpret or apply sec. 5, 38 
Stat. 719, as amended; sec. 7, 38 Stat. 731, as amended; 15 U.S.C. 
45, 18)
Benjamin I. Berman,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-92 Filed 1-3-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6586

Alo USA Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Along Mobile Technology Inc., Inc., Inc. for the Quarter Ending January 31, 2006, I, Wang Zhen, Chief Financial Officer of Along Mobile Technology Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 

 

1.     Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending January 31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.     Theinformation contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the periodended January 31, 2006, fairly represents in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Along Mobile Technology Inc.

 
| Dated: March 27, 2006 |
|-----------------------|

 

**ALONG MOBILE TECHNOLOGY INC.**

 
| By: | */s/ Wang Zhen*Chief Financial Officer |
|-----|----------------------------------------|
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2003

C. MICHAEL WILLOCK; GWENDOLYN E. WILLOCK,

Petitioners - Appellants,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States Tax Court.

(Tax Ct. No. 07-22391)

Submitted: February 25, 2010 Decided: March 2, 2010

Before DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

C. Michael Willock, Gwendolyn E. Willock, Appellants Pro Se. 

Jonathan S. Cohen, John Schumann, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF 

JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

C. Michael Willock and Gwendolyn E. Willock appeal the 

tax court’s order sustaining the Commissioner’s issuance of a 

notice of federal tax lien with respect to the Willocks’ 2001 

federal income tax liability. We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the tax court. Willock v. Comm’r, Tax Ct. No. 

07-22391 (U.S.T.C. Aug. 14, 2009). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Universal Truckload Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donald B. Cochran, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Robert E. Sigler, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, respectively, that (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 9, 2007



/s/ Donald B. CochranDonald B. CochranPresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Robert E. SiglerRobert E. SiglerVice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not
being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Theresa Q. Hoffmann, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Universal Capital Management, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 13, 2009



/s/ Theresa Q. Hoffmann

Theresa Q. Hoffmann

Principal Financial Officer
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Gerald Albert TRYON, Defendant/Appellant.

No. 66612.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Feb. 27, 1996.

Robert E. Steele, Jr., Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Fernando Bermudez, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and GRIMM, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

A jury convicted defendant of involuntary manslaughter, § 565.024, RSMo 1994, and failure to register a motor vehicle, § 301.020.6, RSMo 1994. Defendant also pled guilty to driving while suspended. The trial court sentenced him to seven years, four months, and one year, respectively. Defendant appeals; we affirm.

Defendant’s sole point challenges the sufficiency of the evidence of involuntary manslaughter. We have carefully examined the transcript and find the evidence to be sufficient.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the *193parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 68 (Monday, April 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18085-18086]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8687]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Texas Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of 
the Texas Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene from 1:30 
p.m. and adjourn 4:30 p.m. on Friday, April 28, 1995, at the Holiday 
Inn--Emerald Beach, 1102 South Shoreline Boulevard, Corpus Christi, 
Texas 78401. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss civil rights 
issues in Texas and plan a future project.
    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation 
to the Committee, should contact Committee Chairperson Adolph Canales, 
214-653-6779, or Philip Montez, Director of the Western Regional 
Office, 213-894-3437 (TDD 213-894-0508). Hearing-impaired 
[[Page 18086]] persons who will attend the meeting and require the 
services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional 
Office at least five (5) working days before the scheduled date of the 
meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, March 29, 1995.
Carol-Lee Hurley
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit
[FR Doc. 95-8687 Filed 4-7-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
#### Dorothy LEWIS, Appellant, v. Artis L. CLARK, DDS., Respondent.

No. WD 49375.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

May 16, 1995.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied June 27, 1995.

*227Party Acting Pro Se, Kansas City, KS, for appellant.

James W. Tippin, Keith A. Cutler, Kansas City, for respondent.

Before BRECKENRIDGE, P.J., and ELLIS and LAURA DENVIR STITH, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from a summary judgment in a medical malpractice action.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6923

Omron Management Center of America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
---

---

Exhibit 15.1

SCHEDULE OF VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
(U.S. dollars in thousands)

|                              | Balance at
beginning
of period | Provision for
doubtful
accounts | Translation
adjustments | Balance at end of
period
|----------------------------- | ------------------------------ | ------------------------------- | ----------------------- | ------------------------
|
|
|
|
|Year ended December 31, 2007: |                                |                                 |                         |                         
|Allowance for doubtful debts  |                                |                                 | $                       | 384                     
|                              |                                |                                
|Year ended December 31, 2006: |                                |                                
|Allowance for doubtful debts  |                                |                                 | $                       | 246                     
|                              |                                |                                
|Year ended December 31, 2005: |                                |                                
|Allowance for doubtful debts  |                                |                                 | $                       | 301                     



---

---
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 67 (Friday, April 7, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17826-17827]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8564]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Advisory Panel for Genetics & Nucleic Acids; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Advisory Panel for Genetics & Nucleic Acids (#1149).
    Dates and Times: Monday April 24, thru Wednesday April 26, 1995, 
at 8:30 am to 5 pm.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., 
Arlington, VA, Room 320.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Susan P.R. Snyder (Program Manager) or Philip 
Harriman (Program Director) for Microbial Genetics, Division of 
Molecular and Cellular Biosciences, Room 655, National Science 
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 
306-1441.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate proposals submitted to the 
Microbial Genetics Program [[Page 17827]] in the Division of 
Molecular & Cellular Biosciences at NSF as part of the selection 
process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: April 3, 1995.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-8564 Filed 4-6-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
```
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6716

BYD Motors, Inc:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/84_FR_21389.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel