alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 61 (Thursday, March 30, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16503-16504]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7806]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Settlement Agreement

    Notice is hereby given that a proposed Settlement Agreement in In 
re Shenango Inc., et al., Case No. 92-25379/JLC (W.D. Pa.), entered 
into by the United States on behalf of U.S. EPA, the State of Ohio, and 
debtors Shenango Inc., Shenango Group, Inc., and The Hockensmith 
Corporation was lodged on March 16, 1994 with the United States 
Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. The proposed 
Settlement Agreement resolves certain claims of the United States and 
the State of Ohio under the Comprehensive Environmental Response 
Compensation and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq. and state law 
relating to the Buckeye Reclamation Landfill Site in Belmont County, 
Ohio, and certain claims of the United States for pre-petition 
penalties under the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. Secs. 1251 et seq., and 
the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Under the Settlement 
Agreement, inter alia, the U.S. EPA will have an allowed general 
unsecured claim of $1,252,846.
    The Department of Justice will receive comments relating to the 
proposed [[Page 16504]] Settlement Agreement for 30 days following the 
publication of this Notice. Comments should be addressed to the 
Assistant Attorney General of the Environment and Natural Resources 
Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530, and should 
refer to In re Shenango Inc., et al., D.J. Ref. No. 90-5-2-3-1099D. The 
proposed Settlement Agreement may be examined at the Office of the 
United States Attorney for the Western District of Pennsylvania, 633 
U.S. Post Office and Courthouse, Pittsburgh, PA 15222; the Region V 
Office of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West 
Jackson Street, Chicago, Illinois 60604; and at the Consent Decree 
Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005 (202-
624-0892). A copy of the proposed Settlement Agreement may be obtained 
in person or by mail from the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, 
N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005. In requesting a copy, please 
enclose a check in the amount of $3.00 (25 cents per page for 
reproduction costs), payable to the Consent Decree Library.
Joel M. Gross,
Acting Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment 
and Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 95-7806 Filed 3-29-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
Exhibit # 99.5

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS









We consent to the use of our report dated March 31, 2003 to the shareholders of Dundee Bancorp Inc. on the consolidated balance sheet of Dundee Bancorp Inc. as at December 31, 2002 and the consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders equity and cash flows for the year then ended and our report dated March 31, 2003 related to the supplemental note Differences Between Canadian and United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles which are included in Dundee Bancorp Inc.s Form 40-F filing.  We have not audited any financial statements of Dundee Bancorp Inc. subsequent to December 31, 2002 or performed any audit procedures subsequent to the date of our audit reports.











Toronto, Canada

May
16, 2003

Chartered Accountants
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5071 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of the 

Air Force to designate certain separated members of the Air Force 

as honorary separated members of the Space Force. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 28, 2023 

Mr. BACON (for himself, Mr. CARBAJAL, Mr. BABIN, Mr. LIEU, and Mr. LAMBORN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize the 

Secretary of the Air Force to designate certain separated 

members of the Air Force as honorary separated members of the Space Force. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Space Force Legacy 

5 Guardian Recognition Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5071 IH

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO DESIGNATE CERTAIN SEPARATED 

2 MEMBERS OF THE AIR FORCE AS HONORARY 

3 SEPARATED MEMBERS OF THE SPACE 

4 FORCE. 

5 Chapter 933 of title 10, United States Code, is 

6 amended by adding at the end the following new section: 

7 ‘‘§ 9254. Authority to designate certain separated 

8 members of the Air Force as honorary 

9 separated members of the Space Force 

10 ‘‘(a) AUTHORITY.—The Secretary of the Air Force 

11 may prescribe regulations that authorize an eligible indi12 vidual to be designated as an honorary separated member 

13 of the Space Force. An eligible individual so designated 

14 may be referred to as a ‘Legacy Guardian’. 

15 ‘‘(b) ELEMENTS.—Regulations prescribed under this 

16 section may include the following elements: 

17 ‘‘(1) Eligibility criteria, including applicable 

18 dates of service and constructive service credit, for 

19 designation under this section. 

20 ‘‘(2) An application process through which an 

21 eligible individual, or a survivor of a deceased eligi22 ble individual, may apply for such designation of 

23 such eligible individual. 

24 ‘‘(3) A certificate, approved device, or other in25 signia of such designation. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5071 IH

1 ‘‘(c) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Designation of an 

2 eligible individual under this section shall not be construed 

3 to entitle such eligible individual to any benefit in addition 

4 to those established by this section or pursuant to regula5 tions prescribed under this section. 

6 ‘‘(d) ELIGIBLE INDIVIDUAL DEFINED.—In this sec7 tion, the term ‘eligible individual’ means an individual— 

8 ‘‘(1) whom the Secretary of the Air Force de9 termines served in support of space operations as a 

10 member of the Air Force; and 

11 ‘‘(2) who separates (or previously separated) 

12 from the armed forces as a member of the Air 

13 Force.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 71 (Thursday, April 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 18806]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9069]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Project No. 2275-001]


Public Service Company of Colorado; Notice of Availability of 
Draft Environmental Assessment

April 7, 1995.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission's) 
Regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office 
of Hydropower Licensing has reviewed the application for a new license 
for the existing Salida Hydroelectric Project, located on the South 
Arkansas River and on Fooses Creek in Chaffee County, Colorado, near 
Poncha Springs. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the U.S. 
Forest Service have prepared a Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) for 
the relicense proposal.
    In the DEA, the staff has analyzed the environmental impacts of the 
project and has concluded that relicensing the project, with 
appropriate environmental measures, would not constitute a major 
federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human 
environment. Copies of the DEA are available for review in the Public 
Reference Branch, Room 3104, of the Commission's offices at 941 North 
Capitol Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    Any comments should be filed within 45 days from the date of this 
notice and should be addressed to Lois D. Cashell, Secretary, Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426. Please affix Project No. 275-001 to all comments. 
For further information, please contact Vince Yearick, Environmental 
Coordinator, at (202) 219-3073.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-9069 Filed 4-12-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Rick Wilson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Blacksands Petroleum, Inc., for the fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Blacksands Petroleum, Inc.



Date: March 20, 2009
        By:/s/ Rick Wilson


Rick Wilson, Principal Financial Officer








---
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7093

ECM Industries LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-2494

CHARLES W. KENDLE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

OFFICEMAX, INCORPORATED,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge.

(CA-00-133-2)

Submitted: February 8, 2001 Decided: February 13, 2001

Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles W. Kendle, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Michael Lucas, Kristina

Helen Vaquera, Ruth Goodboe, MCGUIREWOODS, L.L.P., Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Charles W. Kendle appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action alleging employment discrimination. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Kendle v. OfficeMax, Inc., No. CA-00-133-2

(E.D. Va. Oct. 24, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION



 Exhibit 10.3 

[MBIA INC. LETTERHEAD] 

Mitchell Sonkin 
 163 Lake Ave 

Greenwich, CT 06830 

Employment Agreement Extension 

Dear Mitch: 
 We refer to your
letter agreement (the “Employment Agreement”), dated August 4, 2009, setting forth the terms pursuant to which you have continued to be an employee of MBIA Insurance Corporation or one of its affiliates (the
“Employer”), and an officer of MBIA Inc. (“MBIA”) and one or more of its subsidiaries through June 30, 2010, subject to such extension as may be mutually agreed by you, MBIA and the Employer. As
provided in Section 1 of the Employment Agreement, you, MBIA and the Employer hereby mutually agree to extend the Employment Period (within the meaning of the Employment Agreement) through June 30, 2011. Accordingly, the terms and
conditions set forth in the Employment Agreement shall continue until June 30, 2011, unless you, MBIA and the Employer shall mutually agree to further extend the Employment Period or enter into a new agreement. 

For your convenience, a copy of the Employment Agreement is attached to this letter. 

Please confirm your acceptance of the extension of the Employment Period as set forth above by signing below. 

Sincerely, 
  

 

	
	
	/s/ Joseph W. Brown
	Joseph W. Brown
	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


			
		
	Agreed and Accepted:	 	 /s/ Mitchell Sonkin

		 	 Mitchell Sonkin


 Dated:
May 5, 2010 
  

 1
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk February 24, 2009

d0217 

# Order

February 24, 2009

137370

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137370 COA: 275102 Wayne CC: 06-004275-01 KASSEM MOHAMAD SALAMEY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the August 21, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lucas Energy, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William A. Sawyer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/William A. Sawyer
 William A. Sawyer
 Principal Executive Officer
 August 11, 2010
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 57 (Friday, March 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15557]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7255]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-203-000]


K N Interstate Gas Transmission Co., Notice of Filing of 
Reconciliation Report

March 20, 1995.
    Take notice that on March 13, 1995, K N Interstate Gas Transmission 
Co. (KNI) filed a reconciliation report in the above captioned docket. 
KNI states that the filing and refunds were made to comply with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) Order dated March 
2, 1995. KNI also states that these amounts were paid by KNI on March 
8, 1995.
    KNI States that the reconciliation report summarizes refund amounts 
for the period October 1, 1993 through September 30, 1994 related to 
Sections 27 and 28, Second Revised Volume No. 1-B and Section 31, First 
Revised Volume No. 1-D of KNI's FERC Gas Tariff. These sections relate 
to accounting for and refunding of excess IT and storage related 
revenues.
    KNI notes that copies of the filing were served upon KNI's 
jurisdictional customers, interested public bodies, and all parties to 
the proceedings.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to make any protest with 
reference to this filing should file with the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, a 
petition to intervene or a protest in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 
of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 
385.214). All such petitions or protests should be filed on or before 
March 27, 1995. All protests filed with the Commission will be 
considered by it in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but 
will not serve to make the protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a petition to intervene in 
accordance with the Commission's Rules. Copies of this filing are on 
file with the Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-7255 Filed 3-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5027

Enerpac:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXHIBIT 31.2



I, Katherine A. Anderson, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A of Repros Therapeutics Inc.; and



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



|Dated: April 28, 2017 | By: | /s/ Katherine A. Anderson    
|--------------------- | --- | -----------------------------
|                      |     | Katherine A. Anderson        
|                      |     | Chief Financial Officer      
|                      |     | Repros Therapeutics Inc.     
|                      |     | (Principal Financial Officer)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Vystar Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, William R. Doyle, Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Monica A. Schreiber, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each
do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of our knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                   
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                     
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|/s/ William R. Doyle                           
|-----------------------------------------------
|William R. Doyle                               
|Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|November 14, 2012                              
|                                               
|/s/ Monica A. Schreiber                        
|Monica A. Schreiber                            
|Acting Chief Financial Officer                 
|November 14, 2012                              



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to Vystar Corporation and will be retained by Vystar Corporation and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The foregoing certification is being furnished
solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Vystar Corporation,
whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.