alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

         I, Michael D. Queen, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Universal
Capital Management, Inc.;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

                  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

                  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

                  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and

         5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors:

                  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

                  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.



Date:    May 13, 2005                      /s/ Michael D. Queen
                                           ----------------------------
                                           Michael D. Queen
                                           Principal Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002














In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of GeoGlobal Resources Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2010, I, Sunil Karkera, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

















/s/ Sunil Karkera


------------------------


Sunil Karkera


Chief Financial Officer


April 5, 2011
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Larry Weaver, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Beerman, J.), rendered April 17, 1989, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the People’s contention, we find that the defen*487dant’s oral request to join in his codefendant’s written motion to dismiss the indictment on speedy trial grounds satisfied the requirement in CPL 210.45 (1) that such a motion be made in writing, as the issue was identical for both the defendant and the codefendant *(see, People v Haynes,*143 AD2d 571; *cf., People v Lawrence,*64 NY2d 200). Nevertheless, we find that the defendant’s motion was properly denied on the ground that it was not made upon reasonable notice to the People, as required by CPL 210.45 (1). The trial of this matter was scheduled to commence on February 21, 1989, but was adjourned to February 23, 1989. Neither the prosecutor nor the court was advised of the defendant’s intent to make a speedy trial motion until after the People moved the case to trial on February 23, 1989, and a panel of prospective jurors was waiting outside the courtroom door. At that point, the codefendant’s counsel handed the motion papers to the court and served them upon the prosecutor. The motion was made returnable on February 21, 1989, prior to the date the papers were served upon the People. Under the circumstances, we agree with the trial court that the defense counsel’s tactics deprived the People of reasonable notice of the motion *(see, People v Lawrence, supra).*

In any event, even if the defendant’s motion had been timely made, the sworn allegations in support of the motion did not establish that he was entitled to dismissal of the indictment *(see,*CPL 210.45 [4]). A mistrial had been declared on January 23, 1989. Pursuant to CPL 30.30 (5) (a), the six-month period in which the People were required to announce their readiness for trial commenced on the date the order occasioning the retrial became final *(see, People v Holmes,*105 AD2d 803; *People v Passero,*96 AD2d 721; *People v Fudger,*70 AD2d 703). As the defendant’s retrial commenced about one month after the mistrial was declared, his claim that he was denied his right to a speedy trial is without merit.

The defendant further contends that the court erred in closing the courtroom to the public during the testimony of the undercover police officer who was involved in his arrest. At a hearing on the People’s application for closure, the officer testified that he was still working in an undercover capacity and that investigations pending in the same geographical area where the defendant was arrested would be jeopardized if his identity as a police officer were revealed. Upon our review of the hearing transcript we find that closure was proper *(see, People v Glover,*57 NY2d 61; *People v Legette,*153 AD2d 760; *488
      *People v Wharton,*143 AD2d 958, *affd*74 NY2d 921). Thompson, J. P., Kunzeman, Harwood and Miller, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 69 (Tuesday, April 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 18396]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8900]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army

ARMS Initiative Implementation
AGENCY: Armament Retooling and Manufacturing Support (ARMS) Public/
Private Task Force (PPTF).

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given to the 
next meeting of the Armament Retooling and Manufacturing Support (ARMS) 
Public/Private Task Force (PPTF). The PPTF is chartered to develop new 
and innovative methods to maintain the government-owned, contractor-
operated ammunition industrial base and retain critical skills for a 
national industrial emergency. Meeting focus will be:

<bullet> Government & Contractor Interaction Workgroup Report
<bullet> Funding Obligation Plan/Process
<bullet> ARMS Initiative & Funding Extension--FY 96.
<bullet> Loan Guarantee Program
<bullet> Contract Length
<bullet> USC 2692 Process
    A tour of the Indiana Army Ammunition Plant will be included as 
part of this meeting. This session is open to the public.
    Dates of Meeting: May 10-11, 1995.
    Place of Meeting: Holiday Inn, 505 Marriott Drive, Clarksville, 
Indiana 47129.
    Time of Meeting: 8:00 A-5:PM.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Richard Auger, ARMS Task Force, HQ 
Army Material Command, 5001 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, Virginia 
22333; Phone (703) 274-9838.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Reservatons should be made directly with the 
Holiday Inn; telephone (812) 283-4411. Please be sure to mention that 
you will be attending the ARMS PPTF meeting to assure occupancy in the 
block of rooms set aside for this meeting. You should confirm your 
reservation prior to 25 April 1995. Request you contact Debra Yeager in 
the ARMS Team Office at Rock Island Arsenal; telephone (309) 782-4040, 
if you will be attending the meeting, so that our roster of attendees 
is accurate. This number may also be used if other assistance regarding 
the ARMS meeting is required for public review in September of 1995.
Gregory D. Showalter,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-8900 Filed 4-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Craig Jones, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant, by pleading guilty, forfeited any claim of immunity resulting from his testimony before the Grand Jury *(see, People v Sobotker,*61 NY2d 44, 48; *see also, People v Flihan,*73 NY2d 729, 731, *rearg denied*73 NY2d 872). (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court, D’Amico, J.—manslaughter, second degree.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.
$[ ] [ ]

$[ ] [ ]

INPUT

.05

80
Consistent with USTR's Section 301 notice, OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. requests

confidential treatment for the information designated as business confidential in this submission. Such

information consists of information that would not customarily be released to the public, including

business or trade secrets regarding production costs and processes, data on sales, product characteristics

customers, destinations, and other product, sales, and cost-related business secrets. Business confidential

information has been indicated herein by enclosing it in single brackets (“[ ]”). A public version of these

comments is also being filed with all confidential information removed.

OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. submits this exclusion request on behalf of our business

unit. OMRON in the US is the only designer of this product and only supplier of this component.

KNOB ASSY,WINDOW MANUAL is a plastic switch actuator and is used only automotive purposes of

raising and lowering windows, of which is an OEM-specified dimension. It is only used for further

assembly of components which go into domestic automobile production, which is specified by auto

manufacturer.

This product is not a target of the US Administration's 301 investigation regarding Intellectual Property

concerns. This is not a concern to IP transfer and impressment. This product contains no IP of interest

related to autonomous vehicle production.

The tariff action ultimately poses a risk of significant damage to OMRON, the domestic automobile

industry, and ultimately the US consumer as a increase in price. Like in the case of similar approvals for

vehicle components at the HTS level, OMRON views this product in the same manner. Immediate

movement of production to a US manufacturer or another country would pose significant re-tooling

costs, significant amounts of time, and approvals pertaining to consumer automobile safety standards are

costly and would take a significant amount of time to obtain.

OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. believes that CBP can easily exclude the KNOB

ASSY,WINDOW MANUAL in question based solely on the product description. The following are

draft CBP exclusion instructions:

"KNOB ASSY,WINDOW MANUAL; plastic switch actuator with solid "U"-shaped sides, a hollow

shell, and a circular hole halfway down each edge Plastic knob for Power window switch; made of

plastic resin - PC LEXAN 143R-111 CLR; Dimensions 30.59mm X 20.32mm X 20.00mm."

This information will be contained on the invoice from the supplier.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-5435

Robert Bosch Tool:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 73 (Monday, April 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19236-19237]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9305]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Meeting of the DOD Advisory Group on Electron Devices

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Advisory Group on Electron Devices.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Working Group B (Microelectronics) of the DoD Advisory Group 
on Electron Devices (AGED) announces a closed session meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held at 0900, Thursday, April 20, 1995.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Palisades Institute for Research 
Services, 1745 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22202.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Warner Kramer, AGED Secretariat, 1745 
Jefferson Davis Highway, Crystal Square Four, Suite 500, Arlington, 
Virginia 22202.

[[Page 19237]] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The mission of the Advisory 
Group is to provide advice to the Under Secretary of Defense for 
Acquisition and Technology, to the Director Defense Research and 
Engineering (DDR&E), and through the DDR&E, to the Director Advanced 
Research Projects Agency and the Military Departments in planning and 
managing an effective research and development program in the field of 
electron devices.

    The Working Group B meeting will be limited to review of research 
and development programs which the military proposes to initiate with 
industry, universities or in their laboratories. The microelectronics 
area includes such programs on semiconductor materials, integrated 
circuits, charge coupled devices and memories. The review will include 
classified program details throughout.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of Pub. L. No. 92-463, as amended, 
(5 U.S.C. App. II section 10(d) (1988)), it has been determined that 
this Advisory Group meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 
552b(c)(1) (1988), and that accordingly, this meeting will be closed to 
the public.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

    Dated: April 10, 1995.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 95-9305 Filed 4-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
EXHIBIT
23.1





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-3 (File Nos. 333-163648 and 333-163510) and Form S-8 (File Nos. 033-62788,
033-83406, 333-39413, 333-58542 and 333-122343) of Repros Therapeutics, Inc. of
our report dated March 15, 2010 relating to the financial statements and
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in
this Form 10-K.





/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP





Houston,
Texas


March 15,
2010


Exhibit
23.1
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Todd A. WILLIAMS, Defendant/Appellant. Todd A. WILLIAMS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

Nos. 61834, 64517.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

June 28, 1994.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Aug. 11, 1994.

Application to Transfer Denied Sept. 20, 1994.

Cyril M. Hendricks, Jefferson City, for appellant.

*269Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Beeky Owenson Kilpatrick, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was charged by information with three counts of deviate sexual assault in the first degree, § 566.070, RSMo 1986. He was convicted by a jury of one count and acquitted on the other two counts. The court sentenced him to a prison term of seven years. Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 58 (Monday, March 27, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15758]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7405]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket Nos. QF88-292-003 and EL95-29-000]


Kamine/Besicorp Allegany L.P.; Errata Notice

March 21, 1995.
    In the Notice of Amendment to Filing, issued March 13, 1995, (60 FR 
14742, March 20, 1995), change the date for filing protests and 
interventions from March 28, 1995 to April 3, 1995.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-7405 Filed 3-24-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 10.23
                                  PROMISSORY NOTE
                                  ---------------

$100,000                                                         April 24, 1997

                                                         San Carlos, California

     FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Steve Bacich ("BORROWER") promises to pay to
Conceptus, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "COMPANY"), the principal sum of
One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000), together with interest on the unpaid
principal hereof from the date hereof at the rate of 9.5% per annum,
compounded annually. This Note is made pursuant to the terms of a Loan
Agreement of even date herewith (the "AGREEMENT") between Borrower and the
Company and is subject to the terms and conditions of the Agreement.  ALL
CAPITALIZED TERMS USED BUT NOT OTHERWISE DEFINED HEREIN SHALL HAVE THE
MEANINGS GIVEN SUCH TERMS IN THE AGREEMENT.

     All principal and accrued interest shall be due and payable in full on
the earliest of (a) March 26, 2001 or (b) the termination of Borrower's
employment relationship with the Company with or without Cause.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, upon March 26 of 1998, 1999, 2000 and 2001,
the first four anniversaries of Borrower's employment with the Company,
Borrower shall be deemed by the Company to have repaid an amount equal to the
sum of (i) 25% of the Borrowed Amount and (ii) the accrued interest thereon;
provided, further, if Borrower's employment with the Company is Involuntarily
Terminated other than for Cause in connection with a Change of Control, then
any amount of the Loan, including accrued interest, not deemed repaid as
provided above shall be deemed repaid by Borrower in full as of the date of
such termination.

     Borrower may at any time prepay all or any portion of the principal or
interest owing hereunder.  Payments of principal and interest shall be made
in lawful money of the United States of America and shall be credited first
to the accrued interest, with the remainder applied to principal.

     Should any action be instituted for the collection of this Note, the
reasonable costs and attorneys' fees therein of the holder shall be paid by
Borrower.

     This Note is not secured.

     The holder of this Note shall have full recourse against Borrower.  In
case of an event of default (as described in Section 5 of the Agreement), the
Company may proceed against the Borrower as set forth in the Agreement or as
permitted by applicable law.

                                        /s/ Steve Bacich
                                        --------------------------
                                        STEVE BACICH

                                        Address:  20 Fairway Place
                                                  Half Moon Bay, CA  94019
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5211

Scosche Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel