alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exhibit10_1.htm


    
      
         


      

      
         


        
          

        

      

      
         


      

    


    EXHIBIT
10.1

     

    AMENDMENT
TO AMENDED AND RESTATED 1996 EQUITY INVENTIVE PLAN

     

    Adopted
January 26, 2010

     

    


     

    VOTED:        That
the increase in the number of shares issuable under the Tech/Ops Sevcon, Inc.
1996 Equity Incentive Plan by 200,000 shares is hereby approved and
ratified.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 9 (Friday, January 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3235-3236]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-902]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

James A. Redding, et al.; Change in Bank Control Notices; 
Acquisitions of Shares of Banks or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. Once the notices have been accepted for 
processing, they will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later 
than January 27, 1995,
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (James M. Lyon, Vice 
President) 250 Marquette Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480:
    1. James A. Redding and Mary G. Clark, both of Windom, Minnesota; 
each to acquire 25.51 percent of the voting shares of Windom State 
Investment Company, Windom, Minnesota, and thereby indirectly acquire 
Southwest State Bank, Windom, Minnesota.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (John E. Yorke, Senior Vice 
President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64198:
    1. Gary D. Grable, Kansas City, Missouri; to acquire 8.81 percent; 
John [[Page 3236]] H. Ferguson, Liberty, Missouri, to acquire 2.94 
percent; Russell J. Bysel, Prairie Village, Kansas, to acquire 5.87 
percent; Richard L. Bond, Overland Park, Kansas, to acquire 4.41 
percent; Carl Edward Bradley, Lake Waukomis, Missouri, to acquire .73 
percent; Gregory R. Walton, Leawood, Kansas, to acquire 3.67 percent; 
Angela L. Mitchell, Overland Park, Kansas, to acquire 1.47 percent; 
James D. Robertson, Liberty, Missouri, to acquire 2.94 percent; and W. 
Jackson Letts, Mission Hills, Kansas, to acquire 1.47 percent, of the 
voting shares of Guaranty Bancshares Corporation, Kansas City, 
Missouri, and thereby indirectly acquire Guaranty Bank and Trust, 
Kansas City, Kansas.
    2. Bill Taylor, Lansing, Kansas; to acquire an additional 1.13 
percent, for a total of 11.12 percent of the voting shares of Lansing 
Financial Corporation, Lansing, Kansas, and thereby indirectly acquire 
First State Bank of Lansing, Lansing, Kansas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 9, 
1995.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-902 Filed 1-12-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-5767

Alo Tennessee Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 9 (Friday, January 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 3281]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-922]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50-277]


Philadelphia Electric Company, Public Service Electric and Gas 
Company, Delmarva Power and Light Company, Atlantic City Electric 
Company, Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Unit 2; Notice of 
Withdrawal of Application for Amendment to Facility Operating License

    The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has granted 
the request of PECO Energy Company (the licensee) to withdraw its April 
6, 1994 application for proposed amendment to Facility Operating 
License No. DPR-44 for the Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Unit No. 
2, located in York County, Pennsylvania.
    The proposed amendment would have revised the facility technical 
specifications to reflect incorporation of the end-of-cycle 
recirculation pump trip (EOC-RPT) and installation of an adjustable 
speed drive for the recirculation pumps.
    The Commission had previously issued a Notice of Consideration of 
Issuance of Amendment published in the Federal Register on April 28, 
1994 (59 FR 22011). However, by letter dated December 29, 1994, the 
licensee withdrew the proposed change.
    For further details with respect to this action, see the 
application for amendment dated April 6, 1994, supplemental letters 
dated July 6, July 15, August 17 and August 28, 1994, and the 
licensee's letter dated December 29, 1994, which withdrew the 
application for license amendment. The above documents are available 
for public inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room, the 
Gelman Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC, and at the local 
public document room located at the Government Publications Section, 
State Library of Pennsylvania, (Regional Depository) Education 
Building, Walnut Street and Commonwealth Avenue, Box 1601, Harrisburg, 
Pennsylvania 17105.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 9th day of January 1995.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Joseph W. Shea,
Project Manager, Project Directorate, Division of Reactor Projects--
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 95-922 Filed 1-12-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M
##### 



Exhibit 23 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT The Board of Directors
First State Bancorporation: We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-17727) on Form S-3, and (No. 333-3048, No. 333-92795, No. 333-83132, and
No. 333-107061) on Form S-8 of First State Bancorporation of our report dated
January 19, 2004, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of First
State Bancorporation and subsidiary as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income,
stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2003, which report appears in the December 31, 2003,
annual report on Form 10-K of First State Bancorporation. Our report refers to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, in 2002. KPMG LLP Albuquerque, New Mexico
March 11, 2004 -48-
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Elite
Cosmetics, Inc. for the quarter ending July 31, 2005, I, Glen Landry, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Elite Cosmetics, Inc. hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

     1.   Such Quarterly Report on amended Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending
          July 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
          the quarter ending July 31, 2005, fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Elite
          Cosmetics, Inc.

Dated:  December 9, 2005

ELITE COSMETICS, INC.

By: /s/ Glen Landry
-------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
#### Shirley D. FRASER, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Gerald F. DEPPE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 55516.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

May 2, 1989.

Motion for Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 23, 1989.

Gerald F. Deppe, Union, pro se.

Shirley D. Fraser, Raytown, pro se.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Defendant, appearing pro se, appeals the order of the trial court executing on defendant's savings and checking accounts because the monies contained therein are exempt from garnishment pursuant to § 513.430(10)(a), RSMo 1986, (exemption of a person’s right to receive social security benefits, unemployment compensation or local public assistance). Defendant claims the money contained in his bank accounts consisted entirely of his social security benefits.

Once social security funds have been paid to the recipient, the funds are his personal property and are no longer exempt from execution. *Owens v. Owens,*591 S.W.2d 57, 58 (Mo.App.1979). Defendant’s point is, therefore, without merit. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5680

SGRE, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

April 12, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7555

OK International, Inc: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_04.15.19.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                       2,847,438
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,241
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,913,343
<PP&E>                                         197,623
<DEPRECIATION>                                  51,907
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,059,059
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           88,688
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,062
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,958,309
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,059,059
<SALES>                                          1,925
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               139,421
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,687,850
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,548,429)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,548,429)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,548,429)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.13)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.4

                                 AMENDMENT TO
                      OUTSIDE DIRECTORS STOCK OPTION PLAN
                                      OF
                             MEDICALCONTROL, INC.

     1.  The Outside Directors Stock Option Plan of MedicalControl (the
"Directors Plan") is amended to replace the words "Neither the Committee nor the
Board of Directors shall, however, modify any outstanding Option so as to
specify a lower price or accept the surrender of outstanding Options and
authorize the granting of new Options in substitution therefor specifying a
lower price" in Section 17 of the Directors Plan with the words "Only with the
approval of the Board of Directors, may the Company modify any outstanding
Option so as to specify a lower price or accept the surrender of outstanding
Options and authorize the granting of new Options in substitution therefor
specifying a lower price."

     2.  This Amendment to the Directors Plan (this "Amendment") shall become
effective on the date of execution hereof, which date is the date the Board of
Directors approved and adopted the Amendment (the "Effective Date"); provided,
however, if the shareholders of the Company shall not have approved the
Amendment by the requisite vote of the shareholders within twelve (12) months
after the Effective Date, then this Amendment shall terminate and all amendments
to Options theretofore granted under the Directors Plan pursuant to the terms of
this Amendment shall terminate and be null and void.

     EXECUTED as of August 20, 1996.

                                           MEDICALCONTROL, INC.


                                           By:  /s/ J. Ward Hunt
                                              ---------------------------------
                                              J. Ward Hunt, President and Chief
                                              Executive Officer
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7168

Omron Management Center of America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5156 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5156

 To direct the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to 
amend regulations relating to exemptions for engines and equipment for 
         purposes of national security, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 4, 2023

 Mr. Posey (for himself and Mr. Kelly of Pennsylvania) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to 
amend regulations relating to exemptions for engines and equipment for 
         purposes of national security, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``First Responders' Equipment Access 
Act''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO REGULATIONS EXEMPTING ENGINES/EQUIPMENT FOR 
              NATIONAL SECURITY.

    Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency shall revise the 
regulations under section 1068.225(d) of title 40, Code of Federal 
Regulations (as in effect on the date of enactment of this Act)--
            (1) to authorize--
                    (A) manufacturers and secondary engine 
                manufacturers to request a national security exemption 
                under such section 1068.225(d) for engines or equipment 
                intended to be used by Federal, State, or local 
                agencies for providing law enforcement, disaster 
                relief, search and rescue, fire response, or emergency 
                medical services; and
                    (B) an agency of the Federal Government responsible 
                for national defense and the Department of Homeland 
                Security (including the Federal Emergency Management 
                Agency) to endorse a request described in subparagraph 
                (A); and
            (2) to specify that a request for a national security 
        exemption described in paragraph (1)(A), and an endorsement of 
        such a request described in paragraph (1)(B), is not required 
        to specify a quantity of engines or equipment to be exempted in 
        order to receive such an exemption.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Douglas FLYNN, Appellant.

No. WD 47234.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Sept. 28, 1993.

Gary E. Brotherton, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. Nixon, Atty. Gen., Rudolph R. Rhodes, IV, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before SPINDEN, P.J., and FENNER and HANNA, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Douglas Flynn appeals a conviction of first degree robbery. We affirm the judgment. Rule 30.25(b).