alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# FILED
March 19, 1998 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk IN THE COURT OF CRIMI NAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON FEBRUARY 1998 SESSION

RICKY L. SAMMARTINO, ) ) No. 02-C-01-9701-CC-0 0040 APPELLANT, )

) Dyer County v. ) ) Honorable Joe G . Riley, Judge STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) ) (Post- Convic

tion Rel ief) APPELLEE. )

FOR THE APPE LLANT: FOR THE APPELLEE: Vanedda Prince John Knox Walkup Attorney at Law Attorney General & Repor ter P. O. Box 26 425 Fifth Avenue, North Union City, TN 38281 Nashville, TN 37243-0493 Elizabeth T. Ryan Assistant Attorney Gener al 425 Fifth Avenue, North Nashville, TN 37243-0493 C. Phillip Bivens District Attorney General P. O. Box E Dyersburg, TN 38025

OPINION FILED: ____________________________

__________ AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO R ULE 20 Joe B. Jones, Pre siding Judge

### O P I N I O N
The appellant, Ricky L. Sammartino (petitioner), appeals as of right from a judgment of the trial court dismis

sing his post-convi ction action after an evidentiary hearing. The tr ial court found the petitioner was afforded the eff ective assistance of counsel guaranteed by the United States and Tennessee Constitutio ns, and his pleas of guilty pas sed constitutional muster. The petitioner present s two issues

for review. He contends (a) “the trial court erred in holding that the Appellant received th e effective assistance of counsel, ” and (b) “the tr ial court erred in ho lding tha t the Pet itioner vo luntaril y e ntered a p lea of guilty.” After a thorough review of the record, the briefs submitted by the parties, and the law governing the iss ues presented for review , it is the opinion of th is cou rt that the judgmen t of the trial court should be affir med pursuant to Rule 20, Tennessee Co urt o f Criminal Appeals. The petitioner and defense counsel testified at the evidentiary hearing. Their respecti ve testimony conflicted as to every material

issue and fact. It is evident the court accredited the testimony of defense counsel thereby rejecting the testimony given by the petitioner. Thus, the evidence contained in therecord does not preponderate against the findings of fact made by the trial court.

____________________ ________________

___ _ JOE B. JONES, PRESID ING JUDGE CONCUR:

___________________________________ JOHN H. PEAY, JUDGE

___________________________________ THOMAS T. WOODALL, JUDGE
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of China Health Industries Holdings, Inc. a
Delaware corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
“Report”), I, Xin Sun , Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350), that to my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/Xin
      SunXin
      SunChief
      Executive Officer






Date:  May
14, 2010
PUBLIC VERSION Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
$[*********] [******]

$[*********]

INPUT

20.0

$[*********]

[******]

[******]

0.05

PUBLIC VERSION
Consistent with USTR's Section 301 notice, OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. requests

confidential treatment for the information designated as business confidential in this submission. Such

information consists of information that would not customarily be released to the public, including

business or trade secrets regarding production costs and processes, data on sales, product characteristics

customers, destinations, and other product, sales, and cost-related business secrets. Business confidential

information has been indicated herein by enclosing it in single brackets (“[ ]”). A public version of these

comments is also being filed with all confidential information removed.

OMRON in the US is the only designer of this product and only supplier of this component.

CASE IMMOBILIZER is a molded plastic switch housing, and is used only for automotive purposes, of

which is an OEM-specified dimension. It is only used for further assembly of components which go into

domestic automobile production, which is specified by auto manufacturer.

This product is not a target of the US Administration's 301 investigation regarding Intellectual Property

concerns. This is not a concern to IP transfer and impressment. This product contains no IP of interest

related to autonomous vehicle production.

The tariff action ultimately poses a risk of significant damage to OMRON, the domestic automobile

industry, and ultimately the US consumer as a increase in price. Like in the case of similar approvals for

vehicle components at the HTS level, OMRON views this product in the same manner. Immediate

movement of production to a US manufacturer or another country would pose significant re-tooling

costs, significant amounts of time, and approvals pertaining to consumer automobile safety standards are

costly and would take a significant amount of time to obtain.

OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. believes that CBP can easily exclude the CASE

IMMOBILIZER in question based solely on the product description. The following are draft CBP

exclusion instructions:

"CASE IMMOBILIZER circular housing with a raised surface encircling the circumfrence, a plastic

three -sided clip at the 8 o'clock position on the inner diameter of the circular housing extending appx

back 90degrees from the surface orientation; and a plastic rectangular connector housing extending appx

back 90degrees from the surface orientation of the circular housing with a three-sided clip on the right

side of the housing Plastic Cover Made of resin - PBT BLK 46.00 mm X 61.00 mm X 40.00mm"

This information will be contained on the invoice from the supplier.

PUBLIC VERSION
EXHIBIT 23.1
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3(File Nos. 033-83394, 033-86340, 033-99664 and 333-16095) and Form S-8 (File Nos. 033-62788,033-83406, 333-39413 and 333-58542) of Zonagen, Inc. of our reportdated March 25, 2005 relating tothe consolidated financial statements of Zonagen, Inc. and subsidiary which appears in this Form10-K. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading “Selected Consolidated FinancialData” in this Form 10-K.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Houston, Texas
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6199

Dallas Airmotive, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Camber Energy, Inc. 10-Q



Exhibit
32.1



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Camber Energy, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2020, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Louis G. Schott, Interim Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



December 18, 2020

|                                    | 
|----------------------------------- | 
|/s/
    Louis G. Schott             | 
|Louis
    G. Schott                 | 
|Interim
    Chief Executive Officer | 
|(Principal
    Executive Officer)   | 



The
foregoing certification is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”), and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing
of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, whether made before or after the date hereof,
regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Universal Capital Management, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ending January 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael D. Queen, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Michael D. Queen

Michael D. Queen,

Chief Executive Officer



March 16, 2010
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 16, 2018

No. 04-17-00645-CR

Gloria R. PROO,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR2757A

Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

The Appellant’s Motion to Reschedule Oral Argument is hereby GRANTED.

It is so ORDERED on November 16, 2018.

 PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _________________________

 Keith E. Hottle

 Clerk of Court
$[ ] [ ]

$[ ] [ ]

INPUT

.05

80
Consistent with USTR's Section 301 notice, OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. requests

confidential treatment for the information designated as business confidential in this submission. Such

information consists of information that would not customarily be released to the public, including

business or trade secrets regarding production costs and processes, data on sales, product characteristics

customers, destinations, and other product, sales, and cost-related business secrets. Business confidential

information has been indicated herein by enclosing it in single brackets (“[ ]”). A public version of these

comments is also being filed with all confidential information removed.

OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. submits this exclusion request on behalf of our business

unit.

OMRON in the US is the only designer of this product and only supplier of this component.

AT SHIFTER SWITCH is an electronic switch, and is used only for automotive purposes of shifting the

transmission, of which is an OEM-specified dimension. It is only used for further assembly of

components which go into domestic automobile production, which is specified by auto manufacturer.

This product is not a target of the US Administration's 301 investigation regarding Intellectual Property

concerns. This is not a concern to IP transfer and impressment. This product contains no IP of interest

related to autonomous vehicle production.

The tariff action ultimately poses a risk of significant damage to OMRON, the domestic automobile

industry, and ultimately the US consumer as a increase in price. Like in the case of similar approvals for

vehicle components at the HTS level, OMRON views this product in the same manner. Immediate

movement of production to a US manufacturer or another country would pose significant re-tooling

costs, significant amounts of time, and approvals pertaining to consumer automobile safety standards are

costly and would take a significant amount of time to obtain.

OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. believes that CBP can easily exclude the AT SHIFTER

SWITCH in question based solely on the product description. The following are draft CBP exclusion

instructions: "AT SHIFTER SWITCH rectangular base assembly with a "J" shaped switch housing

molded to the top running parallel to the base; circular connector at the center of the base and a

rectangular connector on the edge extending at appx 45 degree angle from the face of the base "Metal,

Plastic, Rubber, Other Material & Material Compound;Switch to change the gear into transmission up

and down; Used for AT Shifter switch; Plastic Handle, Shaft, Detent, spring and Plunger;2) sub assy

including PCB ASSY and Plastic Housing;3) one damper - made of rubber. Handle dimensions 87.8mm

X 53.5mm X 24.9 mm Housing dimensions 55.33mm X 44.29mm X28.5mm."

This information will be contained on the invoice from the supplier.om the supplier.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 75 (Wednesday, April 19, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 19492-19493]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9623]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. 94-NM-123-AD; Amendment 39-9172; AD 95-06-02]


Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747 Series Airplanes, 
Excluding Airplanes Equipped With Pratt & Whitney PW4000 and General 
Electric CF6-80C2 Series Engines

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects a typographical error that appeared in 
the applicability statement of the above-captioned airworthiness 
directive (AD) that was published in the Federal Register on March 14, 
1995 (60 FR 13618). A typographical error in the applicability 
statement of the AD resulted in a reference to airplane line numbers 
that are inaccurate.

DATES: Effective April 13, 1995.
    The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in 
the regulations was previously approved by the Director of the Federal 
Register as of April 13, 1995 (60 FR 13618, March 14, 1995).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim Backman, Aerospace Engineer, 
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, Seattle 
Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 
Washington 98055-4056; telephone (206) 227-2776; fax (206) 227-1181.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Airworthiness Directive (AD) 95-06-02, 
amendment 39-9172, applicable to certain Boeing Model 747 series 
[[Page 19493]] airplanes, was published as a final rule in the Federal 
Register on March 14, 1995 (60 FR 13618). As published, that final rule 
contained a typographical error in the applicability statement.
    The applicability statement indicated that the airplanes affected 
by the AD were, in part, those having line numbers 969 through 922, 
inclusive. However, the correct line numbers are 969 through 992, 
inclusive. These correct line numbers appeared in the notice of 
proposed rulemaking (NPRM), which preceded the final rule.
    This document corrects the reference to the line numbers cited in 
the applicability statement on page 13619, middle column, of the March 
14, 1995 Federal Register of AD 95-06-02, to read as follows:
    ``Applicability: Model 747 series airplanes, line numbers 1 through 
967 inclusive, and 969 through 992 inclusive; excluding airplanes 
equipped with Pratt & Whitney PW4000 or General Electric CF6-80C2 
series engines; certificated in any category.''
    Since no other part of the regulatory information has been changed, 
the final rule is not being republished.

    Issued in Renton, Washington on April 13, 1995.
John J. Hickey,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
Service.
[FR Doc. 95-9623 Filed 4-18-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 70 (Wednesday, April 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 18598]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8928]



[[Page 18598]]

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

[Docket No. TQ95-2-23-000 and TM95-8-23-000]


Eastern Shore Natural Gas Co.; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

April 6, 1995.
    Take notice that on April 3, 1995, Eastern Shore Natural Gas 
Company (ESNG) tendered for filing certain revised tariff sheets 
included in Appendix A to the filing. Such sheets are proposed to be 
effective May 1, 1995.
    ESNG states that the above referenced tariff sheets are being filed 
pursuant to Section 154.308 of the Commission's regulations and 
Sections 21 and 23 of the General Terms and Conditions of ESNG's FERC 
Gas Tariff to reflect a reduction in ESNG's jurisdictional rates. ESNG 
states that the sale rates set forth thereon reflect an overall 
decrease of ($0.1061) per dt in the Demand Charge, and an overall 
decrease of ($0.2901) per dt in the Commodity Charge, as measured 
against ESNG's Quarterly PGA, Docket No. TQ95-1-23-000, et. al., with 
rate in effect as of February 1, 1995.
    ESNG states that copies of the filing have been served upon its 
jurisdictional customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 
20426, in accordance with Rule 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions 
or protests should be filed on or before April 13, 1995. Protests will 
be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action 
to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party to the proceeding must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of the filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-8928 Filed 4-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 64 (Tuesday, April 4, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 17097]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8393]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, April 6, 1995.

PLACE: Room 600, 1730 K Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: In Open session, the Commission will consider 
and act upon the following:

    1. Peabody Coal Co., Docket No. KENT 91-179-R. (Continuation of 
consideration of issues that include whether the judge correctly 
found that the deep cut ventilation requirement proposed by the 
Department of Labor's Mine Safety and Health Administration was 
suitable to Peabody's mine under 30 U.S.C. Sec. 863(o).
    2. Steele Branch Mining, Docket No. WEVA 92-953. (Continuation 
of consideration of issues that include whether the judge correctly 
concluded that Steele Branch Mining violated 30 C.F.R. 
Sec. 77.404(a), and that the violation was significant and 
substantial.)
    3. Madison Branch Mgmt., Docket No. WEVA 93-218-R et seq. 
(Issues on interlocutory review include application of statutory 
penalty criteria in light of proferred settlement agreement.)

    In closed session, the Commission will consider and act upon the 
following:

    1. Buck Creek Coal, Inc., Docket No. LAKE 94-72 (Issues on 
interlocutory review include whether relief from a judge's stay 
order should be granted.)

    It was determined by a majority vote of the Commissioners that this 
matter be discussed in closed session.
    Any person attending the open portion of this meeting who requires 
special accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign 
language interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those 
needs. Subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and 2706.160(e).

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFO: Jean Ellen (202) 653-5629/(202) 708-9300 
for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

    Dated: March 30, 1995.
Jean H. Ellen,
Chief Docket Clerk.
[FR Doc. 95-8393 Filed 3-31-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6735-01-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3209

Nestle Waters North America:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel