alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Tina Louise NUNLEY, Movant, v. KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION, Respondent.

No. 94-SC-917-KB.

Supreme Court of Kentucky.

Dec. 22, 1994.

*291James Early, Lexington, for movant.

Barbara S. Rea, Kentucky Bar Ass’n, Frankfort, for respondent.

OPINION AND ORDER

Movant, Tina Louise Nunley, has moved for permission to resign from the Kentucky Bar Association under terms of suspension for a period of two years, pursuant to SCR 3.480(3). Movant recites that the grounds for this motion stem from actions constituting a violation of SCR 3.130, Rule 8.3(b) and (e), which prohibit a lawyer from committing a criminal act that may reflect adversely upon the lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects, and the prohibition on engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation. Specifically, on March 4, 1994, movant pled guilty to one count of cultivating fewer than five plants of marijuana, a class A misdemeanor, and to one count of criminal attempt to obtain a controlled substance by fraud, a class A misdemeanor. The judgment of the Fayette Circuit Court sentenced movant to a maximum term of six months on each count, but withheld entry of the judgment imposing imprisonment and placed movant on a two year probationary period. Subsequently, an Inquiry Tribunal of the KBA issued a complaint against movant for violation of SCR 3.130, Rule 8.3(b) and (e). The Kentucky Bar Association stated no objection in its response to Nunley’s motion to resign under the terms of a two-year suspension.

Therefore, the motion of Tina Louise Nun-ley to resign from the Kentucky Bar Association under terms of suspension is granted. It is further ordered that:

> 1. Movant shall not be permitted to engage in the practice of law in the Commonwealth of Kentucky as defined by SCR 3.020 until such time as the Supreme Court of Kentucky enters an order reinstating her license to practice law.

> 2. Movant shall not file an application for reinstatement for a period of two years from the date of entry of this order. Movant shall be required to show proof of rehabilitation and satisfactory completion of a remedial program addressing her problems with alcohol and narcotics abuse prior to filing any application for reinstatement of her license.

> 3. Any application for reinstatement filed by the movant shall be governed by SCR 3.510, reinstatement in cases of disciplinary suspension, or any subsequent amendment to SCR 3.510. The disciplinary proceeding represented by Kentucky Bar Association, File No. 4243, shall be terminated with the costs to be paid by the movant in accordance with SCR 3.450(1) and 3.480(3).

> 4. Movant shall comply with the provisions of SCR 3.390 regarding notice to all courts in which she has matters pending and to all clients for whom she is actively involved in representation of her inability to continue to represent them and of the necessity and urgency of promptly retaining new counsel. Movant shall promptly return all active files to her clients.

> 5. Movant shall pay the costs of this proceeding.

All concur.

ENTERED: December 22, 1994.

/s/ Robert F. Stephens CHIEF JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of OPENLiMiT, Inc. (“Registrant”) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“Report”), I, Henry Dattler, chief executive officer and chief financial officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 

(1)     This Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in this Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of 

        operation of the Registrant. 

Date: November 17, 2006 

/s/ Henry Dattler

Henry Dattler 

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer 

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing. 

A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

**16**

----
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6834

Omron Management Center of America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             586
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     36,752
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  40,632
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            86
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,198
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    40,632
<SALES>                                         19,591
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,591
<CGS>                                           18,260
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,260
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,268)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,268)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,268)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.01)
        

</TABLE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6693

C&U Americas, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Exhibit
      99.14





REPORT
      OF
      INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








To
      the
      Partners of


Vision
      L.D.H.A. Limited Partnership





We
      have
      audited the accompanying balance sheet of Vision L.D.H.A. Limited Partnership
      (a
      Michigan limited partnership), MSHDA Development No. 904 as of December 31,
      2004
      and the related statements of profit and loss, changes in partners' equity
      and
      cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the
      responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express
      an opinion on the financial statements based on our audit.





We
      conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards of the Public
      Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require
      that
      we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
      the
      financial statements are free of material misstatement. The partnership has
      determined that it is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform,
      and
      audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included
      consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for
      designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not
      for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the
      partnership's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express
      no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
      supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
      also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
      made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
      presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
      opinion.





In
      our
      opinion, such financial statements present fairly, in all material respects,
      the
      financial position of Vision L.D.H.A. Limited Partnership, MSHDA No. 904 as
      of
      December 31, 2004, and the results of its operations, the changes in its
      cumulative income and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity
      with
      accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
      America.





/s/
      UHY
      LLP


Southfield,
      Michigan


January
      21, 2005
Exhibit 21

                     List of Subsidiaries of the Registrant



        The table below lists the Registrant subsidiaries. Unless otherwise
indicated, the Registrant, or one of its subsidiaries, own 100% of the
outstanding capital stock of the subsidiary.

       Name of Subsidiary                            Country of Incorporation
       ------------------                            ------------------------

       Senstar-Stellar Corporation                   Canada
       Perimeter Products Inc.                       United States
       Senstar-Stellar Inc.                          United States
       Senstar GmbH                                  Germany
       Kobb Inc.                                     United States
       Magal B.V.                                    The Netherlands
       Senstar-Stellar Latin America S.A. de C.V.    Mexico
       Senstar-Stellar Limited                       United Kingdom
       Smart Interactive Systems, Inc.               United States
       E.S.E. Ltd.                                   Israel
       Magal Security Sisteme S.R.L                  Romania
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION N o. 04

- 21

- 00171

- CV Leticia RODRIGUEZ Appellant

v. Lydia RODRIGUEZ and Robert Pereida Appellee s From the 224th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2017CI19456 Honorable Cynthia Marie Chapa , Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios , Justice Delivered and Filed: Novembe r 17, 2021 DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION On September 20, 2021, appellee/cross

- appellant Robert Pereida’s counsel, Sergio R. Davila and Olga G. Brown, filed a motion to withdraw as counsel for appellee/cross

- appellant Robert Pereida. On October 11, 2021, we granted the motion to withdraw and ordered appellee/cross

- appellant Robert Pereida’s counsel to notify him, in writing, of any deadlines. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 6.5(c). We also ordered appellee/cross

- appellant Robert Pereida to file his brief and s tated that failure to file his brief or a motion for extension of time within 10 days of the order would result in dismissal of his cross

- appeal for want of prosecution. See id. R. 38.8(a) , 42.3(c).04

- 21

- 00171

- CV

- 2

- Appellee/cross

- appellant Robert Pereida did not file a motion for extension of time or his brief. Accordingly, Robert Pereida’s cross - appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution

. See id. R. 38.8(a) , 42.3(a). Appellant/cross

- appellee Leticia Rodriguez’s appeal against appellee/c ross appellant Lydia Rodriguez and appellee Robert Pereida , and appellee/cross

- appellant Lydia Rodriguez’s cross

- appeal against appellant/cross

- appellee Leticia Rodriguez are retained on this court’s docket. PER CURIAM
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5190 

To amend the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act to expand certain protections 

to dependents of members of the Armed Forces. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 11, 2023 

Mr. KIM of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act to expand 

certain protections to dependents of members of the 

Armed Forces. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Military Family Pro5 tection from Debt Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MAXIMUM RATE OF INTEREST ON DEBTS INCURRED 

7 BEFORE MILITARY SERVICE APPLICABLE TO 

8 MILITARY DEPENDENTS. 

9 Section 207 of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act 

10 (50 U.S.C. 3937) is amended— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5190 IH

1 (1) in subsection (a)— 

2 (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘or the 

3 servicemember and the servicemember’s spouse 

4 jointly’’ and inserting ‘‘a dependent of the serv5 icemember, or such a dependent and the serv6 icemember jointly’’; and 

7 (B) in paragraph (3), by inserting ‘‘or a 

8 dependent of the servicemember’’ after ‘‘due 

9 from a servicemember’’; 

10 (2) in subsection (b)(1)— 

11 (A) in the paragraph heading, by inserting 

12 ‘‘AND DEPENDENCY’’ after ‘‘MILITARY SERV13 ICE’’; 

14 (B) in subparagraph (A)— 

15 (i) by striking ‘‘of the servicemem16 ber’’; 

17 (ii) by striking clause (i) and inserting 

18 the following: 

19 ‘‘(i) military orders indicating the cur20 rent, future, or past military duty status of 

21 the servicemember; or’’; and 

22 (iii) in clause (ii), by inserting ‘‘or a 

23 certificate from the Defense Manpower 

24 Data Center’’ before the period at the end; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 5190 IH

1 (C) by redesignating subparagraph (B) as 

2 subparagraph (C); and 

3 (D) by inserting the following after sub4 paragraph (A): 

5 ‘‘(B) DEPENDENTS.—In addition to pro6 viding proof of military service under subpara7 graph (A), dependents of servicemembers shall 

8 provide documentation that indicates the de9 pendency status of the dependent at the time 

10 the debt or obligation was incurred and con11 tinuing until the servicemember entered mili12 tary service. Such documentation may include a 

13 marriage certificate, birth certificate, or any 

14 other appropriate indicator of dependency sta15 tus.’’; and 

16 (3) in subsection (c), by inserting ‘‘, dependent, 

17 or both, as the case may be,’’ after ‘‘ability of the 

18 servicemember’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5880

Scosche Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6228

NSK Corporation:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Exhibit 10.4


 


Montpelier Re
Holdings Ltd.

2010 Annual Bonus Plan


 


Purpose


 


The
purpose of this Plan is to increase the intrinsic business value of Montpelier
Re Holdings Ltd. and its operating subsidiaries (the “Company”) by aligning
employee performance with the interests of the Company’s owners. All full-time
employees of the Company shall be eligible to participate in the Plan.


 


Performance Targets


 


The
Plan shall be tied to a calendar year performance cycle consistent with the
Company’s fiscal year. Annual bonus pool targets for categories of employees
and an overall Company performance target under the Plan shall be set by the
Company’s Compensation and Nominating Committee (the “Committee”). At the
conclusion of the calendar year, the Committee shall judge Company performance
against the bonus pool targets when determining the final size of the bonus
pools and the level of payout for each employee. At lower levels of the Company
employee individual performance is also considered. The Company’s Chief Executive
Officer, in consultation with the Committee, shall then recommend the
distribution of the pool to individual Plan participants who are non-executive
officers of the Company. The Committee shall approve any payments to the
Company’s executive officers.


 


Bonus Pool Targets


 


For
the 2010 calendar year, the annual bonus pool targets for the Company’s
officers and all remaining Company staff shall be the following percentages of
eligible salaries:


 


	
  Performance

  	
   

  	
  Group A

  	
   

  	
  Group B

  	
   

  	
  Group C-G

  	
   

  
	
  Minimum

  	
   

  	
  0%

  	
   

  	
  0%

  	
   

  	
  0%

  	
   

  
	
  On Target

  	
   

  	
  100%

  	
   

  	
  75%

  	
   

  	
  10-50%

  	
   

  
	
  Superior

  	
   

  	
  200%

  	
   

  	
  150%

  	
   

  	
  20-100%

  	
   

  



 


Eligible
salaries for all officers and staff shall be equivalent to the 2010 base
salaries of Plan participants (as in effect on April 1, 2010), pro-rated
in the case of any officer or staff member employed by the Company for less
than the entire 2010 calendar year.