United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted March 30, 2011

Decided April 14, 2011

Before

KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge

TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge

ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge

No. 10‐3613

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff‐Appellee,

v.

DENNIS JONES,

Defendant‐Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District

Court forthe Southern District of Indiana,

Indianapolis Division.

No. 1:98‐CR‐38‐LJM‐KPF‐04

Larry J. McKinney,

Judge.

O R D E R

Following a jury trial, Dennis Jones was convicted of conspiring to possess with intent

to distribute and to distribute more than five kilograms of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§

841(a)(1) and 846, and conspiring to launder the proceeds of the drug conspiracy in violation

of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(1)(A)(i) and (h).  At his sentencing hearing held on December 10, 1999,

the court adopted the factual findings and United States Sentencing Guidelines application in

the presentence investigation report for the amount of controlled substances and found that

Jones was responsible for between 50 and 150 kilograms of powder cocaine and at least 1.5

kilograms of crack cocaine.   Pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(d)(1) and the cross‐reference to

U.S.S.G. § 2A1.1,murder of a governmentinformant,Jones was sentencedto life imprisonment.

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
No. 10-3613 Page 2

Jones appealed.  We affirmed his conviction but vacated his sentence and remanded to

thedistrict courtfor sentencing without application ofthemurder cross‐reference.  United States

v. Thompson, 286 F.3d 950 (7th Cir. 2002).  On November 15, 2002, the district courtre‐sentenced

Jones to terms of 350 months’ imprisonment for the drug conspiracy and 240 months’

imprisonment forthe money laundering conspiracy, to be served concurrently.  During the re‐

sentencing the court stated that “I look at these Guidelines and I see that they take into account

the amount of cocaine attributable to you. . . . Now, I do recall your activities in the conspiracy.

They were not minor.  They were important to the conspiracy.”  On January 28, 2008, Jones

filed a pro se Motion to Modify Sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), arguing that he

should receive the benefit of the amended sentencing guideline for crack cocaine pursuant to

Amendment 706 of the Guidelines, which was made retroactive.  See United States v. Neal, 611

F.3d 399, 400 (7th Cir. 2010).  The district court denied the motion, finding that “[b]ecause of

the nature and quantity of drugs for which Dennis Jones is personally accountable, application

of the retroactive Sentencing Guidelines Amendment 706 would notresultin a lower guideline

range.”  Jones appeals the denial and we now affirm the decision of the district court.

Adistrict court’sdenial of a motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)is reviewed for an abuse

of discretion.   United States v. Hall, 600 F.3d 872, 875 (7th Cir. 2010).    “A court abuses its

discretion when it resolves a matter in a way that no reasonable jurist would, or when its

decision strikes us as fundamentally wrong, arbitrary, or fanciful.”  United States v. Young, 555

F.3d 611, 615 (7th Cir. 2009).  And a district court is not authorized to modify a defendant’s

sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) where the retroactive amendment would not lower

the defendant’s guideline range.  United States v. Jackson, 573 F.3d 398, 399 (7th Cir. 2009).  Here,

Jones’s original presentence investigation report and its 2002 supplemental addendum

calculations, which Jones’s counsel agreed to, setforth in detailJones’s involvementin the drug

conspiracy for which he was convicted.  He had a long‐term and thorough involvement in the

conspiracy.  Jones stored the crack cocaine that his co‐conspirator cooked in multi‐kilogram

quantities, transported loads of cocaine between California and Indiana, instructed others on

how to make the trips, made six to eight trips with a co‐conspirator between July 1996 and

March 1997 alone where he picked up at least 10 kilograms of cocaine at a time, and on March

6, 1997, he was stopped in Kansas with approximately $305,000, which was sufficient to

purchase approximately 15 kilograms of cocaine.  The district court did not abuse its discretion

in finding that the nature and quantity of drugs for which Jones was accountable was sufficient

to remain at offense level 38, which makes him ineligible for a reduction of his sentence

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2).  Therefore, the decision of the district court is   

 AFFIRMED.