alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of First State Bancorporation, a New Mexico corporation (the Company), for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Christopher C. Spencer, as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to First State Bancorporation and will be retained by First State Bancorporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                                                                                  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/S/    CHRISTOPHER C.
SPENCER                                                     
|Christopher C. Spencer                                                            
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,and Principal Accounting Officer

March 31, 2010

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the
Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consentof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors

Cymer, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theregistration statements (No. 333-16559, No. 333-99975,No. 333-88616, No. 333-67491, No. 333-48242,No. 333-69736, No. 333-58554, No. 333-109544,No. 333-118496, and No. 333-127748) on Form S-8and in the registration statement No. 333-88496 on Form S-3 ofCymer, Inc. of our report dated February 26, 2007, with respect to theconsolidated balance sheets of Cymer, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31,2005 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations,stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss) and cash flows, for eachof the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006, andthe related financial statement schedule II, management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,2006, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,2006, which reports appear in the December 31, 2006, Annual Report on Form 10-Kof Cymer, Inc.

Our report refers to the Company’s adoption ofStatement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), *Share-Based Payment,* effective January 1, 2006.

Our report dated February 26, 2007 onmanagement’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting asof December 31, 2006 expresses our opinion that Cymer, Inc. did notmaintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,2006, because of the effect of a material weakness on the achievement of theobjectives of the control criteria and contains an explanatory paragraph thatstates the company had inadequate controls over the accounting for incometaxes.

 
| San Diego, California | /s/  KPMG LLP |
|-----------------------|---------------|
| February 26, 2007     |          |

 

----
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5323 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to establish a national requirement 

against the use of marijuana for recreational purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 1, 2023 

Mr. EDWARDS (for himself and Mr. MURPHY) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to establish a national requirement against the use of marijuana for recreational purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop Pot Act of 2023’’. 

5 SEC. 2. NATIONAL REQUIREMENT AGAINST USE OF MARI6 JUANA FOR RECREATIONAL PURPOSES. 

7 (a) WITHHOLDING OF FUNDS FOR NONCOMPLI8 ANCE.—Chapter 1 of title 23, United States Code, is 

9 amended by adding at the end the following: 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5323 IH

1 ‘‘§ 180. National requirement against use of mari2 juana for recreational purposes 

3 ‘‘(a) WITHHOLDING OF FUNDS FOR NONCOMPLI4 ANCE.—The Secretary shall withhold 10 percent of the 

5 amount required to be apportioned to any State under 

6 each of sections 104(b)(1), 104(b)(3), and 104(b)(4) on 

7 the first day of each fiscal year beginning after the date 

8 of the enactment of this section in which the purchase or 

9 public possession of marijuana for recreational purposes 

10 is lawful. 

11 ‘‘(b) EFFECT OF WITHHOLDING OF FUNDS.—No 

12 funds withheld under this section from apportionment to 

13 any State after the date of the enactment of this section 

14 shall be available for apportionment to such State. 

15 ‘‘(c) MARIJUANA DEFINED.—In this section, the 

16 term ‘marijuana’ shall have the meaning given such term 

17 in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 

18 U.S.C. 802).’’. 

19 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The analysis for chap20 ter 1 of title 23, United States Code, is amended by insert21 ing after the item relating to section 179 the following: 

‘‘180. National requirement against use of marijuana for recreational purposes.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of China Health Industries Holdings, Inc. a
Delaware corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the “Report”), I, Xin Sun , Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350), that to my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Xin SunXin
      SunChief
      Executive OfficerDate:  November
      16, 2009
Selected Financial Data
(in thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     Years Ended December 31,
                                      1996        1995        1994        1993        1992
                                      ----        ----        ----        ----        ----
Income Statement Data(3)
<S>                                <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>
Revenues                           $109,162    $ 73,098    $ 61,545    $ 51,888    $ 47,074
Operating Income                     16,995      11,787       9,350       7,692       6,515
Net Income                            9,016       6,721       5,581       3,613       2,266
Earnings per Share(1)              $   0.83    $   0.69    $   0.59
Pro Forma Earnings per Share(2)                                        $   0.43    $   0.33
Balance Sheet Data(3)
Working Capital (Deficiency)       $ 10,771    $  7,849    $  1,874    $  3,604    $   (864)
Total Assets                        101,457      66,764      60,246      48,807      49,557
Total Debt                            5,280       2,052       3,315       4,963      23,723
</TABLE>

(1) Adjusted to reflect 3 for 2 stock splits effected on April 5, 1994 and
    February 5, 1996.
(2) Adjusted to reflect the above stock splits, and assumes the common stock
    issued in connection with the Company's initial public offering in April
    1993 was outstanding for the entire period.
(3) For discussion of acquisitions, see Footnote 18 to the Consolidated
    Financial Statements.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

SIM L. STANLEY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-2621

[November 21, 2018]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Paul L. Backman, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 04-008736-CF-10A.

Sim L. Stanley, South Bay, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

TAYLOR, DAMOORGIAN and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-40957 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus EDUARDO RAMIREZ-CARDENAS, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-98-CR-1047-1

-------------------- June 13, 2000 Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Eduardo Ramirez-Cardenas appeals his jury conviction forillegal entry after deportation, 8 U.S.C. § 1326. RamirezCardenas argues that the evidence was insufficient to show that he voluntarily entered the United States. The jury was free to accept or reject Ramirez-Cardenas’ testimony that he was swept across the Rio Grande River involuntarily, and his testimony did not create a reasonable doubt rendering the Government’s evidence insufficient as a matter of law. The jury chose not to believe Ramirez-Cardenas’ contention that he involuntarily entered theNo. 99-40957 -2- United States as a result of a near drowning experience. All reasonable inferences and credibility choices are reviewed in favor of the verdict, and the jury’s acceptance of the Government’s version of what happened over Ramirez-Cardenas’ version was reasonable. United States v. Cardenas-Alvarez , 987 F.2d 1129, 1131-32 (5th Cir. 1993).
AFFIRMED.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6243

Yanfeng US Automotive Interior Systems I LLC:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
sfy_ex101-05112010.htm




AMENDMENT NO. 3


TO THE


SWIFT ENERGY COMPANY


FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED


2005 STOCK COMPENSATION PLAN







SWIFT ENERGY COMPANY, a Texas corporation (the “Company”), pursuant to the authority granted in Section 14(b) of the Swift Energy Company First Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Compensation Plan (the “Plan”), hereby amends the Plan, effective as of May 11, 2010, as follows:


 


WITNESSETH:


 


WHEREAS, the Plan provides for the maximum aggregate number of shares of the Company’s common stock in respect of which Awards may be granted under the 2005 Plan as 4,100,000 shares (“Plan Maximum”); and


 


WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company and the requisite number of the Company’s shareholders have approved the Plan Maximum to be increased by up to an additional 1,250,000 shares:


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan shall read as follows:


 



	
1.  

	
Existing Section 5(b) of the Plan shall remain in its entirety except that “4,100,000” be deleted and “up to 5,350,000” be substituted in its place.







 



	
2.  

	
Except as amended hereby, the Plan shall remain in full effect.







 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Plan is amended effective as of the day and year first above written.


 



	  	
SWIFT ENERGY COMPANY


	  	
By:

	
 


 


/s/ Bruce H. Vincent


	  	  	
Bruce H. Vincent


President
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

*Docket Numbers:* RP21-832-000.

*Applicants:* Tapstone Energy, LLC, FP Wheeler Midstream, LLC.

*Description:* Joint Petition for Limited Waiver of Capacity Release Regulations, et al. of Tapstone Energy, LLC, et al.

*Filed Date:* 5/19/21.

*Accession Number:* 20210519-5150.

*Comments Due:* 5 p.m. ET 6/1/21.

*Docket Numbers:* RP21-833-000.

*Applicants:* ETC Tiger Pipeline, LLC.

*Description:* § 4(d) Rate Filing: Filed Agreements Housekeeping to be effective 6/21/2021.

*Filed Date:* 5/21/21.

*Accession Number:* 20210521-5054.

*Comments Due:* 5 p.m. ET 6/2/21.

*Docket Numbers:* RP21-834-000.

*Applicants:* Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America.

*Description:* § 4(d) Rate Filing: Amendment to a Negotiated Rate Agreement Filing—La Frontera Holdings, LLC to be effective 6/1/2021.

*Filed Date:* 5/21/21.

*Accession Number:* 20210521-5218.

*Comments Due:* 5 p.m. ET 6/2/21.

The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system (*https://elibrary.ferc.gov/​idmws/​search/​fercgensearch.asp*) by querying the docket number.

Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the proceeding.

eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying facilities filings can be found at: *http://www.ferc.gov/​docs-filing/​efiling/​filing-req.pdf.* For other information, call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Dated: May 24, 2021.

Debbie-Anne A. Reese,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2021-11363 Filed 5-27-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION OF OFFICERS
                           OF BIO-BRIDGE SCIENCE, INC.
                           PURSUANT TO 18 USC ss. 1350

I, Liang Qiao, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(a) The quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005
of Bio-Bridge Science, Inc. (the "Company"), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(b) Information contained in such Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                       Dated: May 15, 2006

                                       /s/ Dr. Liang Qiao
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       By: Dr. Liang Qiao,
                                       Chief Executive Officer

I, Chuen Huei (Kevin) Lee, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(c) The quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005
of Bio-Bridge Science, Inc. (the "Company") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(d) Information contained in such Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                       Dated: May 15, 2006

                                       /s/ Chuen Huei (Kevin) Lee
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       By: Chuen Huei (Kevin) Lee
                                       Chief Financial Officer and
                                       Principal Accounting Officer
| ATTEST:                 |   |   | FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK      |   |
|------------------------------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------|--------|
|                         |   |   |                                 |   |
|                         |   |   |                                 |   |
| /s/ Patrick G. O'Brien       |   |   | /s/ John L. Lacarte                  |   |
|                         |   |   |                                 |   |
|                         |   |   |                                 |   |
| ATTEST:                 |   |   | FEDFIRST FINANCIAL CORPORATION  |   |
|                         |   |   |                                 |   |
|                         |   |   |                                 |   |
| /s/ Patrick G. O'Brien  |   |   | /s/ John L. Lacarte             |   |
|                         |   |   |                                 |   |
|                         |   |   |                                 |   |
| ATTEST:                 |   |   |                                 |   |
|                         |   |   |                                 |   |
|                         |   |   |                                 |   |
| /s/ Patrick G. O'Brien  |   |   | /s/ Robert C. Barry, Jr.        |   |
|                         |   |   | Robert C. Barry, Jr.            |   |

----
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5656

Fluor Enterprises, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-6951

General Motors:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel