alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 61 (Thursday, March 30, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 16487]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7887]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Social Security Administration


Rescission of Social Security Rulings on the Definition of 
``Eligible Spouse'' as it is Used in the Supplemental Security Income 
(SSI) Program

agency: Social Security Administration, HHS.

action: Notice of rescission of Social Security Rulings (SSR) 76-28, 
76-41, and 88-11c.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

summary: The Commissioner of Social Security gives notice of the 
rescission of SSR 76-28, SSR 76-41, and SSR 88-11c.

effective date: March 30, 1995.

for further information contact: Joanne K. Castello, Division of 
Regulations and Rulings, Social Security Administration, 6401 Security 
Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235, (410) 965-1711.

supplementary information: Social Security Rulings make available to 
the public precedential decisions relating to the Federal old-age, 
survivors, disability, supplemental security income, and black lung 
benefits programs. Social Security Rulings may be based on case 
decisions made at all administrative levels of adjudication, Federal 
court decisions, Commissioner's decisions, opinions of the Office of 
the General Counsel, and other policy interpretations of the law and 
regulations.
    SSR 76-28 and SSR 76-41 were published in the 1976-1980 Cumulative 
Edition of the Rulings, and SSR 88-11c was published in the 1988 
Cumulative Edition of the Rulings. These Rulings concern the definition 
the Social Security Administration used for the term ``eligible 
spouse'' in supplemental security income cases.
    Section 8012 of Public Law (Pub. L.) 101-239 (the Omnibus Budget 
Reconciliation Act of 1989) changed the definition of the term 
``eligible spouse'' by eliminating the 6-month waiting period for 
ending couple status after a separation. The definition of the term 
``eligible spouse'' as used in these Rulings is no longer applicable 
because of the revised statutory definition. We are publishing final 
regulations to reflect section 8012 of Pub. L. 101-239 on this date.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.807 
Supplemental Security Income.)

    Dated: February 1, 1995.
Shirley S. Chater,
Commissioner of Social Security.
[FR Doc. 95-7887 Filed 3-29-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4190-29-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 72 (Friday, April 14, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19080-19081]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9293]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Missouri Recreational River Advisory Group

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice sets the schedule for the forthcoming meeting of 
the Missouri Recreational River Advisory Group. Notice of this meeting 
is required under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463).

Meeting Date and Time: Thursday, May 3, 1995; 1:30 p.m.

Addresses: Niobrara State Park, Group Lodge, Niobrara, Nebraska. 
[[Page 19081]] 
    Agenda topics include:
    1. Discussion of the 39-mile planning team meeting held in O'Neill, 
Nebraska on March 29-31, 1995.

    2. Corps of Engineers discussion of the sedimentation study of the 
Niobrara River.

    3. The opportunity for public comment and proposed agenda, date, 
and time, of the next Advisory Group meeting.

    The meeting is open to the public. Interested persons may make 
oral/written presentation to the Commission or file written statements. 
Requests for time for making presentations may be made to the 
Superintendent prior to the meeting or to the Chair at the beginning of 
the meeting. In order to accomplish the agenda for the meeting, the 
Chair may want to limit or schedule public presentations.

    The meeting will be recorded for documentation and a summary in the 
form of minutes will be transcribed for dissemination. Minutes of the 
meeting will be made available to the public after approval by the 
Commission members. Copies of the minutes may be requested by 
contacting the Superintendent. An audio tape of the meeting will be 
available at the headquarters office of the Niobrara/Missouri National 
Scenic Riverways in O'Neill, Nebraska.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Advisory Group was established by the 
law that established the Missouri National Recreational River, Public 
Law 102-50. The purpose of the group, according to its charter, is to 
advise the Secretary of the Interior on matters pertaining to the 
development of a management plan, and management and operation of the 
Recreational River. The Missouri National Recreational River is the 39-
mile free flowing segment of the Missouri from Fort Randall Dam to the 
vicinity of Springfield in South Dakota.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Warren Hill, Superintendent, Niobrara/
Missouri National Scenic Riverways, P.O. Box 591, O'Neill, Nebraska 
68763-0591, 402-336-3970.

    Dated: April 5, 1995.

William W. Schenk,

Regional Director.

[FR Doc. 95-9293 Filed 4-13-95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-3775

Cummins Inc Power Systems Business Unit: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7225

MAHLE Behr USA, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Exhibit 23.2




               Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants

Perimeter Products, Inc. (A Wholly Owned Subsidiary of Kobb, Inc.)
Fremont, California

         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the previously
filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-06246) and on Form F-3
(No. 333-9050) and related prospectus of Magal Security Systems, Ltd. (the
"Company")of our report dated February 2, 2001, except for the matters discussed
in the third paragraph of our report, as to which the date is January 25, 2002,
relating to the financial statements of Perimeter Products, Inc. appearing in
the Company's Annual Report on Form 20-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2002.
Our report contains a qualified opinion regarding the effects of certain
inventory and warranty accrual overstatements on the 2000 financial statements
of Perimeter Products, Inc.



/s/ BDO SEIDMAN, LLP
BDO Seidman, LLP


San Jose, California
March 22, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM NEURO
NAVIGATIONAL 1996 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         105,204                 280,115
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  396,873                 407,728
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (17,000)                (17,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  1,519,099               1,270,311
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,047,817               2,007,605
<PP&E>                                         742,405                 553,518
<DEPRECIATION>                                (420,045)               (324,379)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,376,400               2,326,992
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,706,713                 595,908
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,867,795               1,867,795
<COMMON>                                         9,934                   9,934
<OTHER-SE>                                  (3,212,068)               (152,735)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,376,400               2,326,992
<SALES>                                      2,103,246               2,218,299
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,103,246               2,218,299
<CGS>                                        1,417,399               1,726,345
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,417,399               1,726,345
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,598,038               3,901,570
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             162,657                  13,554
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (3,055,733)             (2,891,049)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,600                   1,750
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (3,059,333)             (2,892,799)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                (3,059,333)             (2,892,799)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.31)                   (.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of First State Bancorporation, a New Mexico corporation (the Company), for the period ended December 31,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Christopher C. Spencer, as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to First State Bancorporation and will be retained by First State Bancorporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                                                                                   
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Christopher C. Spencer                                                         
|Christopher C. Spencer                                                             
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, and Principal Accounting Officer
|March 14, 2005                                                                     



This certification accompanies the
Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-20201

Conference Calendar

 

JOE VIDALES,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

LANTERN SQUARE APARTMENTS; SUN BELT PROPERTIES;

STETSON SECURITY SERVICES; ISACC, Security Guard,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. CA-H-95-3689

- - - - - - - - - -

June 25, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Essentially for reasons stated by the district court, we

hold that the district court did not abuse its discretion in

dismissing Joe Vidales’s (#677120) civil rights action as

frivolous. See Booker v. Koonce, 2 F.3d 114, 115 (5th Cir.

1993); Resident Council of Allen Parkway Village v. U.S. Dep’t of

Housing and Urban Dev., 980 F.2d 1043, 1050 (5th Cir.), cert.

denied, 114 S. Ct. 75 (1993). Because the appeal is frivolous,
No. 96-20201

- 2 -

it is DISMISSED. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir.

1983); 5th Cir. Rule 42.2. Vidales’s Motion Summary Judgment,

Motion Subpoena Duces Tecum, and Motion to Have Counsel Appointed

are DENIED as MOOT. 

 We caution Vidales that any additional frivolous appeals

filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of

sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Vidales is further cautioned to

review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise

arguments that are frivolous because they have been previously

decided by this court.

APPEAL DISMISSED. SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 26, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-7056

Gatekeeper Systems, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-7380

Nissan North America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
**EXHIBIT99.1**

 

 

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

I, Patrick J. Dirk,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report Troy Group, Inc.on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended May 31, 2002 fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q/A fairly presents in allmaterial respects the financial condition and results of operations of TroyGroup, Inc.

 
|   | By:                                           |    /s/  Patrick J. Dirk |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|   | Name: Patrick J. Dirk                         |
|   | Title: President and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
IB 

Union Calendar No. 347 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 524 

[Report No. 118–421] 

To amend the Coastal Barrier Resources Act to create an exemption for 

certain shoreline borrow sites. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 25, 2023 

Mr. ROUZER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

MARCH 12, 2024 

Additional sponsors: Ms. MACE, Mr. FLEISCHMANN, and Mr. VAN DREW

MARCH 12, 2024 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 

House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed 

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 

[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on January 25, 2023] 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 524 RH

A BILL 

To amend the Coastal Barrier Resources Act to create an 

exemption for certain shoreline borrow sites. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 524 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FEDERAL COASTAL STORM RISK MANAGEMENT 

4 PROJECTS. 

5 Section 6(a) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 

6 U.S.C. 3505(a)) is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing: 

8 ‘‘(7) Use of a sand source within a System unit 

9 by Federal coastal storm risk management projects or 

10 their predecessor projects that have used a system unit 

11 for sand to nourish adjacent beaches outside the Sys12 tem pursuant to section 5 of the Act of August 18, 

13 1941 (commonly known as the ‘Flood Control Act of 

14 1941’) (55 Stat. 650, chapter 377; 33 U.S.C. 701n) at 

15 least once between December 31, 2008 and December 

16 31, 2023 in response to an emergency situation prior 

17 to December 31, 2023.’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 347 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 524 

[Report No. 118–421] 

A BILL 

To amend the Coastal Barrier Resources Act to 

sites. create an exemption for certain shoreline borrow 

MARCH 12, 2024 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Comand ordered to be printed mittee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS