alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Organization Name:

Note: Representatives submitting on behalf of an organization must enter information below.

Requestor Representative:

Section 301 Investigation: China's Acts, Policies, and Practices Related to Technology 

Transfer, Intellectual Property, and Innovation - Form to Request Exclusion of Product

When submitting a product exclusion request using this form, enter the specified 

information in the following fields and explain the basis and rationale for your statements. 

By completing this form, you certify that the information provided is complete and 

correct to the best of your knowledge. 

1. Indicate whether the comment contains business confidential information (BCI), is a public

document, or is a public version of a BCI document.

3.

2. Please provide a complete and detailed description of the product of concern:

4.

5. Requestor's relationship to the product:

CONTINUED BELOW

*

10-digit HTSUS item number* for product you wish to address in this product exclusion request:

Use numerical characters only with no special characters (example: 1023456789). For help in finding 

the HTSUS item number associated with your product, see https://hts.usitc.gov/

1

7.

6. Does this submission in regulations.gov include additional attachments?

Please indicate whether any additional attachment contains business confidential

information (BCI), is a public document, or is a public version of a BCI document.

VERSION 1

Requestor Information

Requestor Name (Last, First):

Public Version of BCI

RRH1001, 100 ton Capacity, 1.50 in Stroke, Double-Acting, Hollow Plunger Hydraulic Cylinder; 

Maximum Operating Pressure psi: 10000; Weight Kgs: 33; Oil Capacity Advance cm3: 505; Stroke 

Ranges mm: 24 - 47

8412210075 Schmidt, Jackie Enerpac Jackie SchmidtImporter Yes Contains BCI
END 2

8. Is this product, or a comparable product, available from sources in the United States?:

VERSION 1

11. Please provide information in support your request, taking account of the instructions

provided in Section B of the Federal Register notice (note: text entered below can extend

beyond the apparent size of this box).

9. Is this product, or a comparable product, available from sources in third countries?:

10. Please provide the value and quantity (with units) of the Chinese-origin product of concern

that you purchased for each calendar year specified. Limit this figure to the products

purchased by your firm (or by members of your trade association) alone. Please provide 

estimates if precise figures are unavailable.

2016 Value:

2015 Value:

2017 Value:

2016 Quantity:

2015 Quantity:

2017 Quantity:

No No BCI BCI BCI BCI BCI BCI

See addendum for additional information.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6414

C&U Americas, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-6409

C&U Americas, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-6615

Petroleum Equipment & Services Association:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Conceptus, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's
knowledge, that:

         (i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for
     the twelve months ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies
     with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of
     the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

Date:  April 30, 2004

/s/ Mark M. Siecakarek
-------------------------------------
Mark M. Sieczkarek
President and Chief Executive Officer

<PAGE>

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Conceptus, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's
knowledge, that:

         (i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for
     twelve months ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with
     the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

Date:  April 30, 2004

/s/ Gregory E. Lichtwardt
-------------------------------
Gregory E. Lichtwardt
Executive Vice President, Treasurer and
Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6604

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JOSEPH ZIADEH,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 05-7512

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JOSEPH ZIADEH,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 06-6095

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,
- 2 -

versus

JOSEPH ZIADEH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior

District Judge. (CR-02-273)

Submitted: March 31, 2006 Decided: April 19, 2006

Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Ziadeh, Appellant Pro Se. Gurney Wingate Grant, II, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Joseph Ziadeh appeals a

district court’s orders (1) denying his motion for temporary

injunction and/or in the alternative motion to stay execution of

judgment; (2) holding him in civil contempt; and (3) denying his

various subsequent motions. We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. See United States v. Ziadeh, No. CR-02-273

(E.D. Va. Mar. 28, 2005; filed June 23, 2005, and entered June 24,

2005; Dec. 22, 2005). We further deny Ziadeh’s motion in No. 05-

7512 to vacate the contempt order and deny as unnecessary his

petition for certificate of appealability filed in No. 05-6604. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### P., W.E., Appellant, v. L., R. Jr. & L.T., Respondents.

No. 70057.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

Oct. 29, 1996.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Dec. 17,1996.

*53Party acting pro se, Jefferson City, for Appellant.

Jamis Kresyman, Clayton, for Respondents.

Before RHODES RUSSELL, P.J., and SIMON and KAROHL, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

W.E.P., pro se, appeals from the a decree, of adoption of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County.

We affirm the decree pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties involved, has been provided explaining the reason for our holding.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6188

SGRE, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5262 

To require the Secretary of Defense to publish information regarding the 

status of certain cleanup efforts of the Department of Defense, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 22, 2023 

Ms. SLOTKIN (for herself, Mr. POSEY, Ms. HOULAHAN, and Mr. BERGMAN) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Armed Services 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Defense to publish information 

regarding the status of certain cleanup efforts of the 

Department of Defense, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘DoD PFAS Cleanup 

5 Transparency Act of 2023’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5262 IH

1 SEC. 2. PUBLICATION OF INFORMATION REGARDING STA2 TUS OF CERTAIN CLEANUP EFFORTS OF DE3 PARTMENT OF DEFENSE. 

4 Beginning not later than one year after the date of 

5 the enactment of this Act, and not less frequently than 

6 annually thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall publish 

7 on the publicly available website established under section 

8 331(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fis9 cal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92; 10 U.S.C. 2701 note) 

10 timely and regularly updated information on the status of 

11 the cleanup of sites for which the Secretary has obligated 

12 amounts for environmental restoration activities. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5657

Apergy ESP Systems, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report, included in this Form 10-KSB, into the Company's previously filed FORM
S-8 REGISTRATION STATEMENT NO. 333-70301, 333-89436, 33-89438, 33-89440,
33-97648 and 33-97650 and Form S-3 Registration Statement Nos. 333-84367,
33-25321, 33-58334-FW, 33-91278, 33-97646, 33-05025, 333-47781 and 333-69363.


/s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Dallas, Texas
  March 30, 2000
EXHIBIT
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Juma Technology, Corp. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-QSB/A (Amendment No. 1) for the period ended September 30, 2007
      as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Report"), I, Anthony M. Servidio, the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
      of
      the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section. 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


January
              30, 2008
            
            /s/ Anthony
                M. ServidioAnthony
                M. Servidio
              Chief
                Executive Officer & Chairman
EXHIBIT 32.01





CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, David DeMarco, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the amended Quarterly Report of Blacksands Petroleum, Inc. on Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal period ended April 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Blacksands Petroleum, Inc.





By:

/S/    DAVID DEMARCODate: September 28, 2010

Name:

David DeMarcoTitle:

Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

ABDULRAHIM ABDUL RAZAK 

AL GINCO, 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Petitioner, 

v. Civil Action No. 05-1310 (RJL) 

BARACK OBAMA, et al., 

Respondents. 

-rORDER 

(March/f ,2009) [#s 37, 38] 

In light of petitioner's initial Traverse, filed March 16, 2009 through the 

Court Security Office, and for the purpose of judicial efficiency, it is hereby 

ORDERED that petitioner's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment or, in 

the Alternative, an Order to Show Cause is DENIED without prejudice; it is 

further 

ORDERED that petitioner shall be granted leave to file a supplemental 

Traverse advancing any legal arguments included in the aforementioned motion 

that petitioner did not include in his initial Traverse and upon which he intends to 

rely in support of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. 

SO ORDERED. 

United States District Judge
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 63 (Monday, April 3, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16879-16880]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8120]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Cancellation of 
Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of the cancellation of one meeting of the 
[[Page 16880]] National Institute of Mental Health which was published 
in the Federal Register on March 3, 1995 (60 FR 11976): the Extramural 
Science Advisory Board, April 24-25, 1995, Conference Room 10, Building 
31, National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 
20892.
    The meeting was cancelled due to prior commitments of several 
members.

    Dated: March 28, 1995.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 95-8120 Filed 3-31-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

KEITH EUGENE RASKA,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-2968

[December 31, 2020]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Laura Johnson, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 502009CF000393-AXXX-MB.

Keith Eugene Raska, Live Oak, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, CIKLIN and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.