alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4140

Tianhai Electric North America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-7297

Honeywell International, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

“Made in China 2025” or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
**EXHIBIT 32.02**

 

**Section 1350 Certification**

 

In connection with this quarterly report of ML Winton FuturesAccess LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I, Barbra E. Kocsis, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1. This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Date: May 13, 2011

 

 
| By                                           | /s/   BARBRA E. KOCSIS |   |
|----------------------------------------------|------------------------|--------|
| Barbra E. Kocsis                             |                   |
| Chief Financial Officer                      |                   |
| (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |                   |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 68 (Monday, April 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18102-18103]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8695]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

MSB Holding Company; Notice of Application to Engage de novo in 
Permissible Nonbanking Activities

    The company listed in this notice has filed an application under 
Sec.  225.23(a)(1) of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.23(a)(1)) 
for the Board's approval under section 4(c)(8) of the Bank Holding 
Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843(c)(8)) and Sec.  225.21(a) of Regulation Y 
(12 CFR 225.21(a)) to commence or to engage de novo, either directly or 
through a subsidiary, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in Sec.  
225.25 of Regulation Y as closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, such activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    The application is available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. Once the application has been accepted 
for processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing on the question whether consummation of the proposal can 
``reasonably be expected to produce benefits to the public, such as 
greater convenience, increased competition, or gains in efficiency, 
that outweigh possible adverse effects, such as undue concentration of 
resources, decreased or unfair competition, conflicts of interests, or 
unsound banking practices.'' Any request for a hearing on this question 
must be accompanied by a statement of the reasons a written 
presentation would not suffice in lieu of a hearing, identifying 
specifically any questions of fact that are in dispute, summarizing the 
evidence that would be presented at a hearing, and indicating how the 
party commenting would be aggrieved by approval of the proposal.
    Comments regarding the application must be received at the Reserve 
Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than 
April 24, 1995.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (James A. Bluemle, Vice 
President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690:
    1. MSB Holding Company, Moorhead, Iowa; to engage de novo in making 
and [[Page 18103]] servicing loans, pursuant to Sec.  225.25(b)(1) of 
the Board's Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 4, 1995.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-8695 Filed 4-7-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 70 (Wednesday, April 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 18588]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9010]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Office of the Secretary of the Army; Notice of Intent to Prepare 
a Supplemental Environmental Impact Analyses for Disposal and Reuse of 
Fort Ord

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DOD.

ACTION: Notice of Intent to prepare a Supplemental Environmental Impact 
Statement (SEIS) for the disposal and reuse of Fort Ord, California, to 
cover the additional lands to be made available for disposal as a 
result of downsizing the Presidio of Monterey (POM) Annex and changes 
in intended reuse identified in the December 12, 1994, Fort Ord Reuse 
Authority (FORA) Reuse Plan.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The action evaluated in the SEIS is the disposal and reuse of 
Fort Ord, California, in accordance with the legislative requirements 
of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990, Public Law 
101-510. The SEIS will cover additional lands to be made available for 
disposal as a result of downsizing the POM Annex located on the former 
Fort Ord. Because the opportunity for supplementation has arisen, the 
environmental effects of changes in land uses between Fort Ord Reuse 
Group's (FORG's) draft reuse plan of October 1993 and FORA's approved 
reuse plan of December 1994 that have not been adequately addressed in 
previous National Environmental Policy Act documentation will also be 
considered.

ALTERNATIVES: Alternatives to the POM Annex and a no-POM Annex 
alternative were addressed in the Final EIS. This EIS addressed a range 
of alternative future land uses. These alternatives will be 
supplemented with information on the new smaller POM Annex and final 
Reuse Plan of the Fort Ord Reuse Authority.

PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT: The public will be invited to participate in the 
scoping process, review of the draft SEIS and a public meeting. The 
location and time of the scoping meeting to be scheduled during April 
1995 will be announced in the local news media. The release dates of 
the draft SEIS for public comment and the public meeting will also be 
announced in the local news media, as the dates are established.

POINT OF CONTACT: Mr. Bob Verkade, Scaramento District, U.S. Army Corps 
of Engineers, (916) 557-7423.

    Dated: April 6, 1995.
Lewis D. Walker,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army (Environment, Safety and 
Occupational Health), OASA (IL&E).
[FR Doc. 95-9010 Filed 4-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6738

Valeo North America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

“Made in China 2025” or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of North Penn Bancorp, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Frederick L. Hickman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.




Date:   August 14, 2006                /s/ Frederick L. Hickman
        -------------------            -------------------------------------
                                       Frederick L. Hickman
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                               
    EXHIBIT 24(b)
                                                              Form 10-K for 1996
                                                                File No. 1-11237





                    CERTIFICATE OF CORPORATE RESOLUTION



        I, Madelyn C. Law, an Assistant Secretary of AT&T Capital Corporation,
hereby certify that the following resolutions were duly adopted by the Audit
Committee of AT&T Capital Corporation's Board of Directors at a meeting held on
March 13, 1997:

        RESOLVED: that the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for 1996
substantially in the form presented to the Committee at this meeting is
approved, with such changes as the Chief Financial Officer may approve, provided
that any material changes will also be approved by the General Counsel and the
Chief Executive Officer and that the Audit Committee will be advised of any
material changes made in the financial statements (or related notes) in the Form
10-K; and

        FURTHER RESOLVED: that the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial
Officer and the Controller are each severally authorized to sign the Form 10-K
in the name and on behalf of the Company.


                                                    Madelyn C. Law

Dated:  March 18, 1997                              Madelyn C. Law


<PAGE>
Exhibit 13.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Magal Security System Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 20-F/A for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jacob Even Ezra, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/Jacob Even-Ezra
------------------
Jacob Even-Ezra
Chief Executive Officer

September 8, 2005
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly Report of North Penn Bancorp, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Philip O. Farr, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



Date:  March 29, 2006                      /s/ Philip O. Farr
       --------------                      -------------------------
                                           Philip O. Farr
                                           Senior Vice President and
                                           Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 80 (Wednesday, April 26, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 20555]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9445]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency


Information Collection Submitted to OMB for Review

AGENCY: Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of information collection submitted to OMB for review 
and approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Office of the Comptroller of 
the Currency (OCC) hereby gives notice that it has sent to the Office 
of Management and Budget (OMB) a Paperwork Reduction Act Submission 
regarding an information collection titled Fiduciary Interview.

DATES: Comments on this information collection are welcome and should 
be submitted by May 1, 1995.

ADDRESSES: A copy of the submission may be obtained by calling or 
writing the OCC contact.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the requirements of the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the OCC has 
sent to the OMB a Paperwork Reduction Act Submission regarding the 
following information collection:

Type of Review: Expedited.
Title: Fiduciary Interview.
Description: The OCC will seek the views of a cross-section of 
fiduciary bankers, primarily senior trust officers of large, medium, 
and small institutions. The OCC will use this information as a factor 
in designing and scheduling examiner training to adequately address 
focus areas, to make staffing decisions, and to redesign its fiduciary 
examination procedures.
Form Number: None.
OMB Number: None.
Respondents: Businesses or other for-profit.
Number of Respondents: 100.
Total Annual Responses: 100.
Average Hours Per Response: 1 hour.
Total Annual Burden Hours: 100.
OMB Reviewer: Milo Sunderhauf, (202) 395-7340, Paperwork Reduction 
Project 1557, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10226, New 
Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.
OCC Contact: John Ference or Jessie Gates, (202) 874-5090, Legislative 
and Regulatory Activities Division, Office of the Comptroller of the 
Currency, 250 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20219.
    Comments: Comments regarding the submission should be addressed to 
both the OMB reviewer and the OCC contact listed above.

    Dated: April 11, 1995.
Brenda Curry,
Assistant Director, Legislative and Regulatory Activities.
[FR Doc. 95-9445 Filed 4-25-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-33-P
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 102 (Friday, May 28, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 28831]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-11321]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9056-7]


Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information 202-564-5632 or https://www.epa.gov/nepa.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS)
Filed May 17, 2021 10 a.m. EST Through May 24, 2021 10 a.m. EST
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/cdx-enepa-public/action/eis/search.

EIS No. 20210057, Revised Final, USFS, AZ, Travel Management on the 
Tonto National Forest, Review Period Ends: 06/28/2021, Contact: Gregory 
Schuster 480-292-0291.
EIS No. 20210058, Final Supplement, USACE, CA, American River Watershed 
Common Features, Water Resources Development Act of 2016 Project--
Sacramento Weir Widening, Review Period Ends: 06/28/2021, Contact: 
Robert Chase 916-557-7630.
EIS No. 20210059, Final, USFS, CO, Enlargement of Monument Reservoir 
No. 1 Project, Review Period Ends: 07/12/2021, Contact: John Slown 406-
493-4196.
EIS No. 20210060, Draft, USACE, TN, North DeSoto County, Mississippi 
Feasibility Study, Comment Period Ends: 07/12/2021, Contact: Andrea 
Carpenter 901-544-0817.

    Dated: May 24, 2021.
Cindy S. Barger,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2021-11321 Filed 5-27-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DANNY JAMES COHEA, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

C. E. DUCART; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees, 

and 

EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., Former 

Governor; et al., 

Defendants.

No. 19-16783 

D.C. No. 3:17-cv-05399-CRB 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Charles R. Breyer, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 7, 2020**

Before: TASHIMA, BYBEE, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges. 

California state prisoner Danny James Cohea appeals pro se from the district 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

APR 17 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 19-16783 

court’s order denying his motion for a preliminary injunction in his 42 U.S.C. 

§ 1983 action alleging constitutional claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1292(a)(1). We review for an abuse of discretion. Jackson v. City & County of 

San Francisco, 746 F.3d 953, 958 (9th Cir. 2014). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Cohea’s motion for 

a preliminary injunction because Cohea failed to demonstrate that such relief is 

warranted. See id. (plaintiff seeking preliminary injunction must establish that he

is likely to succeed on the merits, likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of 

preliminary relief, the balance of equities tips in his favor, and an injunction is in 

the public interest).

To the extent that Cohea challenges any other orders, we lack jurisdiction to 

consider them in this appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1) (court of appeals has 

jurisdiction to review an interlocutory denial of injunctive relief); see also 28 

U.S.C. § 1291 (generally, court of appeals only has jurisdiction over appeals from 

final decisions of the district court); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th 

Cir. 1981) (absent certification under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b), an order is not 

appealable unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or judgment is entered).

Cohea’s motion to take judicial notice (Docket Entry No. 22) is denied.

AFFIRMED.