19190 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 73 / Monday, April 17, 1995 / Proposed Rules

visual inspection to detect damage of the

drive mechanism of the thrust reverser, in

accordance with the alert service bulletin. If

any damage to the drive mechanism is

detected, prior to further flight, repair or

replace the damaged parts with new or

serviceable parts, in accordance with the

Chapter 78 of the DC–9 Overhaul Manual.

(c) Within 10 days after accomplishing the

visual inspection of the driver links of the

thrust reverser door to determine whether the

driver links are chamfered, as required by

paragraph (a) of this AD, submit a report of

the inspection results (both positive and

negative findings) to the Manager, FAA,

Transport Airplane Directorate, Los Angeles

Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 3960

Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California

90712; telephone (310) 627–5245; fax (310)

627–5210; Attention: Robert Baitoo.

Information collection requirements

contained in this regulation have been

approved by the Office of Management and

Budget (OMB) under the provisions of the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C.

3501 et seq.) and have been assigned OMB

Control Number 2120–0056.

(d) As of the effective date of this AD, no

person shall install, on any airplane, a driver

link or overcenter link assembly of a thrust

reverser that has not been previously

inspected, and replaced or reworked, in

accordance with McDonnell Douglas DC–9

Alert Service Bulletin A78–67, dated

February 27, 1995.

(e) An alternative method of compliance or

adjustment of the compliance time that

provides an acceptable level of safety may be

used if approved by the Manager, Los

Angeles ACO, FAA, Transport Airplane

Directorate. Operators shall submit their

requests through an appropriate FAA

Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may

add comments and then send it to the

Manager, Los Angeles ACO.

Note 2: Information concerning the

existence of approved alternative methods of

compliance with this AD, if any, may be

obtained from the Los Angeles ACO.

(f) Special flight permits may be issued in

accordance with §§ 21.197 and 21.199 of the

Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197

and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a

location where the requirements of this AD

can be accomplished.

Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 10,

1995.

S.R. Miller,

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.

[FR Doc. 95–9351 Filed 4–14–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–U

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 94–AWP–28]

Proposed Establishment of VOR

Federal Airway V–514; CA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

SUMMARY: This proposed rule would

establish Federal Airway V–514 from

the Mission Bay, CA, Very High

Frequency Omnidirectional Range/

Tactical Air Navigation (VORTAC) to

the Boulder City, NV, VORTAC. Pilots

are presently issued several airway

segments between the Mission Bay, CA,

VORTAC and the Boulder City, NV,

VORTAC. The establishment of this

airway would provide pilots with one

airway segment between these two

points. This action would improve

traffic flow and reduce pilot/controller

workload.

DATES: Comments must be received on

or before June 2, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on the

proposal in triplicate to: Manager, Air

Traffic Division, AWP–500, Docket No.

94–AWP–28, Federal Aviation

Administration, P.O. Box 92007,

Worldway Postal Center, Los Angeles,

CA 90009.

The official docket may be examined

in the Rules Docket, Office of the Chief

Counsel, Room 916, 800 Independence

Avenue, SW., Washington, DC,

weekdays, except Federal holidays,

between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.

An informal docket may also be

examined during normal business hours

at the office of the Regional Air Traffic

Division.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Norman W. Thomas, Airspace and

Obstruction Evaluation Branch (ATP–

240), Airspace—Rules and Aeronautical

Information Division, Air Traffic Rules

and Procedures Service, Federal

Aviation Administration, 800

Independence Avenue, SW.,

Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202)

267–9230.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

Interested parties are invited to

participate in this proposed rulemaking

by submitting such written data, views,

or arguments as they may desire.

Comments that provide the factual basis

supporting the views and suggestions

presented are particularly helpful in

developing reasoned regulatory

decisions on the proposal. Comments

are specifically invited on the overall

regulatory, aeronautical, economic,

environmental, and energy-related

aspects of the proposal.

Communications should identify the

airspace docket number and be

submitted in triplicate to the address

listed above. Commenters wishing the

FAA to acknowledge receipt of their

comments on this notice must submit

with those comments a self-addressed,

stamped postcard on which the

following statement is made:

‘‘Comments to Airspace Docket No. 94–

AWP–28.’’ The postcard will be date/

time stamped and returned to the

commenter. All communications

received on or before the specified

closing date for comments will be

considered before taking action on the

proposed rule. The proposal contained

in this notice may be changed in light

of comments received. All comments

submitted will be available for

examination in the Rules Docket both

before and after the closing date for

comments. A report summarizing each

substantive public contact with FAA

personnel concerned with this

rulemaking will be filed in the docket.

Availability of NPRM’s

Any person may obtain a copy of this

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM)

by submitting a request to the Federal

Aviation Administration, Office of

Public Affairs, Attention: Public Inquiry

Center, APA–220, 800 Independence

Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591, or

by calling (202) 267–3485.

Communications must identify the

notice number of this NPRM. Persons

interested in being placed on a mailing

list for future NPRM’s should also

request a copy of Advisory Circular No.

11–2A, which describes the application

procedure.

The Proposal

The FAA is considering an

amendment to part 71 of the Federal

Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 71) to

establish Federal Airway V–514 from

the Mission Bay, CA, VORTAC to the

Boulder City, NV, VORTAC. The

establishment of this airway would

improve the efficiency of the system

because pilots are routinely issued

several airway segments along this

route. To reduce communications and

eliminate potential confusion between

pilots and controllers, only one airway

segment would be issued between the

Mission Bay, CA, VORTAC and the

Boulder City, NV, VORTAC. This action

would improve traffic flow and reduce

pilot/controller workload. Domestic

VOR Federal airways are published in

paragraph 6010(a) of FAA Order

7400.9B dated July 18, 1994, and

effective September 16, 1994, which is

incorporated by reference in 14 CFR

71.1. The airway listed in this document

would be published subsequently in the

Order.

The FAA has determined that this

proposed regulation only involves an

established body of technical

regulations for which frequent and

routine amendments are necessary to

keep them operationally current. It,
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 73 / Monday, April 17, 1995 / Proposed Rules 19191

therefore—(1) is not a ‘‘significant

regulatory action’’ under Executive

Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant

rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies

and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February

26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant

preparation of a regulatory evaluation as

the anticipated impact is so minimal.

Since this is a routine matter that will

only affect air traffic procedures and air

navigation, it is certified that this rule,

when promulgated, will not have a

significant economic impact on a

substantial number of small entities

under the criteria of the Regulatory

Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

Airspace, Incorporation by reference,

Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

In consideration of the foregoing, the

Federal Aviation Administration

proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as

follows:

PART 71—[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for part 71

continue to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. app. 1348(a), 1354(a),

1510; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–

1963 Comp. p. 389; 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 14 CFR

11.69.

§ 71.1 [Amended]

2. The incorporation by reference in

14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation

Administration Order 7400.9B, Airspace

Designations and Reporting Points,

dated July 18, 1994, and effective

September 16, 1994, is amended as

follows:

Paragraph 6010(a)—Domestic VOR Federal

Airways

* * * * *

V–514 [New]

From Mission Bay, CA; INT Mission Bay

091°T(076°M) and Julian, CA, 185°T(170°M)

radials; Julian; Thermal, CA; Twentynine

Palms, CA; INT Twentynine Palms

043°T(028°M) and Goffs, CA, 200°T(185°M)

radials; Goffs; INT Goffs 033°T(018°M) and

Boulder City, NV, 165°T(150°M) radials;

Boulder City.

* * * * *

Issued in Washington, DC, on April 7,

1995.

Nancy B. Kalinowski,

Acting Manager, Airspace-Rules and

Aeronautical Information Division.

[FR Doc. 95–9402 Filed 4–14–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND

URBAN DEVELOPMENT

Office of the Assistant Secretary for

Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity

24 CFR Part 120

[Docket No. R–95–1726; FR–3593–P–01]

RIN 2529–AA71

Community Housing Resource Board

Program

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant

Secretary for Fair Housing and Equal

Opportunity, HUD.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: This proposed rule would end

the Community Housing Resource

Board (CHRB) Program at 24 CFR part

120. The purpose of the proposed rule

is to eliminate a program determined to

be duplicative and unnecessary.

DATES: Comments due date: June 16,

1995.

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are

invited to submit comments regarding

this proposed rulemaking to the Rules

Docket Clerk, Office of General Counsel,

Room 10278, Department of Housing

and Urban Development, 451 Seventh

Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20410.

Communications should refer to the

above docket number and title. A copy

of each communication submitted will

be available for public inspection and

copying between 7:30 a.m. and 5:30

p.m. weekdays at the above address.

Facimile (FAX) comments are not

acceptable.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Maxine Cunningham, Acting Director,

Office of Fair Housing Assistance and

Voluntary Programs, Room 5234, 451

Seventh Street, S.W., Washington, D.C.

20410–2000. Telephone number (202)

708–0800. A telecommunications device

(TDD) for hearing and speech impaired

persons is available at (202) 708–0455.

(These are not toll-free numbers.)

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The CHRB

Program was established in 1982 at 24

CFR part 120, under authority of Title

VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (42

U.S.C. 3601). The purpose of the

program is stated, at 24 CFR 120.5, as:

The purpose of the Community Housing

Resource Board Program is to provide

funding to Community Housing Resource

Boards (Resource Boards) that have the

responsibility of providing program

implementation assistance to housing

industry groups that have signed Voluntary

Affirmative Marketing Agreements (VAMA)

with HUD. The intent of the program is to

fulfill HUD’s contractual agreement to

provide technical assistance to local real

estate boards in achieving VAMA goals by

supporting projects that improve Resource

Board performance and increase their ability

to effectively plan, finance, and carry out

activities to assist signatory real estate boards

in fully implementing the provisions of the

VAMA.

Through Fiscal Year 1990, $15.274

million was appropriated and disbursed

to CHRBs under a competitive grant

process. Approximately 25–50 CHRBs

were funded each year. In order to be

eligible, projects must have been

directed at one or more of the following

areas:

(1) Making information public

regarding the goals of fair housing and

the VAMA;

(2) Assessing community fair housing

needs;

(3) Assessing the effectiveness of the

VAMA;

(4) Expanding minority involvement

in the industry;

(5) Expanding public awareness of

housing opportunities in the

community; and

(6) Developing cooperative solutions

to problems associated with the

implementation of the VAMA.

CHRB projects include developing

brochures, videos, and other outreach

materials; conducting fair housing

seminars and conferences to inform

realtors and other housing industry

professionals as well as the general

public of their rights and

responsibilities under the Fair Housing

Law; school poster contests where

children’s art work depicts ‘‘Fair

Housing for All’’; and scholarship

programs to attract minorities into the

real estate profession.

However, no funds have been

appropriated for the Community

Housing Resource Board (CHRB)

Program since Fiscal Year (FY) 1990.

There are several reasons for this. One

reason is that another source of funding

for the same activities was made

available. The Fair Housing Initiatives

Program (FHIP), established in 1987,

includes an Education and Outreach

Initiative. This Initiative funds

education and outreach projects

designed to inform members of the

public concerning their rights and

obligations under the provisions of fair

housing laws. As private, non-profit

organizations, CHRBs are eligible for

funding under the FHIP.

Another reason concerns

modifications to VAMAs since the

initiation of the CHRB Program. In 1991

HUD began negotiations with the

National Association of Realtors (NAR)

for a revised VAMA. One of the major

changes proposed by NAR was the

elimination of the requirement to utilize