alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5742

Kyungshin Lear Sales and Engineering LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

“Made in China 2025” or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 3(a)(i)
 
                           CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                      OF

                         CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

     Fort Bend Holding Corp., a corporation organized and existing under and by
virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware,

     DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

     FIRST:  That at a meeting of the Board of Directors of Fort Bend Holding
Corp., resolutions were adopted setting forth a proposed amendment to the
Certificate of Incorporation of said corporation, declaring said amendment to be
advisable and directing that such amendment be considered at the next Annual
Meeting of Stockholders of said corporation.  The resolution setting forth the
proposed amendment is as follows:

     RESOLVED, that Section A of Article Fourth of the Certificate of
Incorporation of the Corporation be amended to read as follows:

     FOURTH:

     A.  The total number of shares of all classes of stock which the
Corporation shall have the authority to issue five million (5,000,000)
consisting of:

          1.   One million (1,000,000) shares of preferred stock, par value one
cent ($.01) per share (the "Preferred Stock"); and

          2.   Four million (4,000,000) shares of common stock, par value one
cent ($.01) per share (the "Common Stock");

     SECOND: That thereafter, at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of said
corporation held on July 29, 1997, pursuant to notice in accordance with Section
222 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, the necessary
number of shares as required by statute were voted in favor of the amendment.

     THIRD: That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the
applicable provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State
of Delaware.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said Fort Bend Holding Corp. has caused this
certificate to be signed by Lane Ward, its President and Chief Executive
Officer, this 12th day of August, 1997.

                                    FORT BEND HOLDING CORP.


                              By:/s/ Lane Ward
                                 --------------------------------
                                 Lane Ward
                                 President and Chief Executive Officer
#### AARON THOMAS DEAL v. LEISURE LADS, INC.

(Filed 22 March, 1961.)

Appeal by plaintiff from *Sharp-, S.J.,*9 January 1961 Special Civil Term of Mecrlenburg.

Civil action to recover damages for personal injuries.

From a judgment of compulsory nonsuit entered at the close of plaintiff’s evidence, plaintiff appeals.

*Hugh M. McCauley and J. C. Sedberry for plaintiff, appellant.*

*Carpenter, Webb & Golding by: John G. Golding for defendant, appellee.*

PeR Curiam.

Fairview Church Road intersects almost at right angles U. S. Highway No. 21 about three miles south of the town of Mooresville. U. S. Highway No. 21 has a posted 60 miles an hour speed limit. There were traffic islands east and west of the intersection and stop signs on the Fairview Church Road. About 11:30 a.m. on 11 May 1959 plaintiff, a man 69 years old, drove an automobile from Fairview Church Road into this intersection, and was crossing the intersection at a speed of five to eight miles an hour, when there was a collision between his automobile and a station wagon driven by an employee of defendant on U. S. Highway No. 21 at a speed of 60 miles an hour, resulting in injuries to plaintiff.

It would serve no useful purpose to state a summary in detail of plaintiff’s evidence. After a careful study of all the evidence, it is our opinion that what *Stacy, C.J.,*said for the Court in *Houston v. City of Monroe,*213 N.C. 788, 197 S.E. 571, is applicable here: “In the circumstances thus disclosed by the record, we are constrained to hold that the demurrer to the evidence should have been sustained, if not upon the principal question of liability, then upon the ground of contributory negligence.”

The judgment of nonsuit below is

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 524 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                 Union Calendar No. 347
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 524

                          [Report No. 118-421]

 To amend the Coastal Barrier Resources Act to create an exemption for 
                    certain shoreline borrow sites.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 25, 2023

  Mr. Rouzer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

                             March 12, 2024

    Additional sponsors: Ms. Mace, Mr. Fleischmann, and Mr. Van Drew

                             March 12, 2024

  Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 
       House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
 [Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed 
                               in italic]
[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on January 
                               25, 2023]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Coastal Barrier Resources Act to create an exemption for 
                    certain shoreline borrow sites.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FEDERAL COASTAL STORM RISK MANAGEMENT PROJECTS.

    Section 6(a) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 
3505(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(7) Use of a sand source within a System unit by Federal 
        coastal storm risk management projects or their predecessor 
        projects that have used a system unit for sand to nourish 
        adjacent beaches outside the System pursuant to section 5 of 
        the Act of August 18, 1941 (commonly known as the `Flood 
        Control Act of 1941') (55 Stat. 650, chapter 377; 33 U.S.C. 
        701n) at least once between December 31, 2008 and December 31, 
        2023 in response to an emergency situation prior to December 
        31, 2023.''.
                                                 Union Calendar No. 347

118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 524

                          [Report No. 118-421]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To amend the Coastal Barrier Resources Act to create an exemption for 
                    certain shoreline borrow sites.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 12, 2024

  Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 
       House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of

TANYA LASHAWN BRIDGES

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT
FROM INACTIVE STATUS :

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 86 DB 201 7 (No. 55 RST 2017)

Attorney Registration No. 207478

( Out of State )

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 14 th day of August

, 201 7 , the Report and Recommendation of

Disciplinary Board Member dated August 1 , 2017, is approved and it is ORDERED that

Tanya LaShawn Bridges

, who has been on Inactive Status

, has never been suspended

or disbarred, and has demonstrated that s he has the moral qualifications, competency

and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be

and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of th e Bar of this

Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and

processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8, Nos. 333-63070, 333-04186, 333-30111 and 333-42656) pertaining to the
2001 Equity Incentive Plan, 1995 Director Stock Option Plan, 1995 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan and 1993 Stock Plan and in the Registration Statements (Form S-3,
Nos. 333-59368, 333-42798, and 333-73550) of Conceptus, Inc. and in the related
Prospectuses of our report dated February 1, 2001, with respect to the 2000 and
1999 consolidated financial statements and schedule of Conceptus, Inc. included
in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2001.

                                          /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Palo Alto, California
March 28, 2002
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 68 (Monday, April 10, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 18009]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8778]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

39 CFR Part 20


Implementation of WORLDPOST Priority Letter; Correction

AGENCY: Postal Service.

ACTION: Interim rule; Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to the interim rules 
published on March 17, 1995 (60 FR 14370-14371). Those rule relate to 
the implementation on March 16, 1995, of WORLDPOST Priority Letter, a 
new international postal service.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 16, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Janet M. Mitchell, (202) 268-6095
    In the rules beginning on page 14370 in the issue of Friday, March 
17, 1995, make the following correction:
    On page 14371 in the second column, under section 226.32, Service 
Areas, the last line of the ZIP Code service area shown in the chart 
was ``20910-20912, 222, 223''. This line should read ``20910-20912, 
220-223''.

    Dated: April 5, 1995.
Stanley F. Mires,
Chief Counsel, Legislative.
[FR Doc. 95-8778 Filed 4-7-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3498

JLG Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6872

United Scope LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_05.09.19.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5241

Williams Controls Incorporated:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests. 

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Exhibit
      32








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
      THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Music International, Inc. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2006 (the
“Report”), Corinne Fallacaro, Principal Executive Officer of the Company,
      certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the Company’s financial position and results of operations.











Date: February
      5, 2007    /s/
      Corinne Fallacaro


----------------------------------


Corinne
      Fallacaro


Principal
      Executive Officer and


Principal
      Accounting Officer
| 1.     | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                              |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
| 2.     | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Arctic Oil & Gas Corp. |

| By:                | /s/ Peter J. Sterling                                                                                                                                                |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|     | Peter J. SterlingPresident, Principal Executive Officer, Treasurer, Principal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and a member of the Board of Directors |
#### James L. BROWN, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

No. 62680.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Aug. 3, 1993.

John A. Klosterman, St. Louis, for mov-ant-appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Rudolph R. Rhodes, IV, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the dismissal, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value.. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cole Credit Property Trust II, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Cole Credit Property Trust II, Inc.Date:      August 12, 2010
    By:
    /s/ D. Kirk McAllaster, Jr.Name:
    D. Kirk McAllaster, Jr.Title:
    Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial
Officer (Principal
Financial Officer)
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT WILLIE LEE WINTONS, ) ) Appellant/Cross- ) Appellee. ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-2659 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee/Cross- ) Appellant. ) ________________________________ )
Opinion filed September 28, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Joseph A. Bulone, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Jean Marie Henne, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant/ Cross-Appellee. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jonathan P. Hurley, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
NORTHCUTT, VILLANTI, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

WILLIE LEE WINTONS, )

)

Appellant/Cross- )

Appellee. )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-2659

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee/Cross- )

Appellant. )

________________________________ )

Opinion filed September 28, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas

County; Joseph A. Bulone, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender,

and Jean Marie Henne, Special Assistant

Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant/

Cross-Appellee.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,

Tallahassee, and Jonathan P. Hurley, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa,

for Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, VILLANTI, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We  consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
Campo  Electronics,  Appliances  and Computers, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 33-
56796) of our report, which includes an explanatory  paragraph  regarding  the
Company's ability to continue as a going  concern,  dated  November  14, 1997,
except as to Note six and Note seven,  as  to  which  the date is December 12,
1997, on  our  audits  of  the  financial  statements  of  Campo  Electronics,
Appliances and Computers, Inc. as of August 31, 1997 and 1996, and for each of 
the three years in the period ended August 31, 1997, which report is  included  
in  this Annual Report on Form 10-K.





/s/  Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.

COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.





New Orleans, Louisiana
December 12, 1997