alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIB 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5103 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 4, 2024 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, 

and Transportation 

AN ACT 

To require the Director of the Office of Management and 

Budget to approve or deny spend plans within a certain 

amount of time, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 5103 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fishery Improvement 

3 to Streamline untimely regulatory Hurdles post Emer4 gency Situation Act’’ or the ‘‘FISHES Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. SPEND PLANS. 

6 Section 312(a)(6) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery 

7 Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 

8 1861a(a)(6)) is amended— 

9 (1) in subparagraph (D), to read as follows: 

10 ‘‘(D) SPEND PLANS.— 

11 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—To receive an allo12 cation from funds available under para13 graph (9), a requester with an affirmative 

14 fishery resource disaster determination 

15 shall submit a spend plan to the Secretary, 

16 not more than 120 days after receiving no17 tification that funds are available, that 

18 shall include the following information, if 

19 applicable: 

20 ‘‘(I) Objectives and outcomes, 

21 with an emphasis on addressing the 

22 factors contributing to the fishery re23 source disaster and minimizing future 

24 uninsured losses, if applicable. 

25 ‘‘(II) Statement of work. 

26 ‘‘(III) Budget details. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 5103 RFS

1 ‘‘(ii) REVIEW.— 

2 ‘‘(I) IN GENERAL.—The Sec3 retary shall review a spend plan sub4 mitted under clause (i) to determine if 

5 it is complete and provide notice with6 in 10 days. 

7 ‘‘(II) INCOMPLETE SPEND

8 PLAN.—If the Secretary determines 

9 that a spend plan submitted under 

10 clause (i) is not complete, when pro11 viding the notice required by sub12 clause (I), the Secretary shall provide 

13 a detailed description of the informa14 tion that is necessary for the spend 

15 plan to be determined complete.’’; and 

16 (2) in subparagraph (F)(i), to read as follows: 

17 ‘‘(i) AVAILABILITY.— 

18 ‘‘(I) TIMELINE.—Funds shall be 

19 made available to grantees not later 

20 than 90 days after the date the Sec21 retary receives a complete spend plan. 

22 ‘‘(II) REVIEW OF COMPLETED

23 SPEND PLAN AND APPORTIONMENT

24 OF FUNDS.—If so requested, the Di25 rector of the Office of Management 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
4 

HR 5103 RFS

1 and Budget may review a completed 

2 spend plan concurrently with the Sec3 retary. The Director of the Office of 

4 Management and Budget may not 

5 delay the timeline described in sub6 clause (I).’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 3, 

2024. 

Attest: KEVIN F. MCCUMBER, 

Clerk. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6838

Omron Management Center of America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
#### Joann HAZZARD, Employee-Appellant, v. CHRYSLER MOTOR PLANT II, Employer-Respondent.

No. 63164.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Aug. 31, 1993.

Gabriel & McCartney, P.C., James F. McCartney, St. Louis, for employee-appellant.

Raymond J. Flunker, Jeffrey M. Proske, Evans & Dixon, St. Louis, for employer-respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Employee, Joann Hazzard, appeals from a decision by the Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) which reduced the worker’s compensation award set by the Administrative Law Judge against her employer-de1 fendant, Chrysler Motor Plant II.

The Commission’s decision is supported by substantial and competent evidence on the whole record; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value.

The decision of the Industrial Relations Commission is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 24, 2009 

d0217 

Order 

 

February 24, 2009 

137370 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137370 

 COA: 275102 

Wayne CC: 06-004275-01 

KASSEM MOHAMAD SALAMEY, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 21, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
**EXHIBIT99.2**

 

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

I, James W. Klingler, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that theQuarterly Report Troy Group, Inc. on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period endedMay 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form10-Q/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition andresults of operations of Troy Group, Inc.

 

 
|   | By:                                          |    /s/James W. Klingler |
|--------|----------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|   | Name: James W. Klingler                      |
|   | Title: Chief Financial Officer and Secretary |

 

----
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6018

Kyungshin Lear Sales and Engineering LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

“Made in China 2025” or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7023

MAHLE Behr USA, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

JULY 29, 2009

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 08-17186

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

Agency Nos. A097-939-818,

A097-322-268

YBRAHIN GABRIEL MUNOZ,

NATALIA ANTONIA TORREALBA,

Petitioners,

versus

U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

________________________

Petition for Review of a Decision of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

_________________________

(July 29, 2009)

Before WILSON, PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Petitioners, natives and citizens of Venezuela, petition for review of the
order of removal of the Board of Immigration Appeals and denial of their

application for asylum and withholding of removal under the Immigration and

Nationality Act and relief under the United Nations Convention Against Torture

and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. We dismiss in

part and deny in part.

The petitioners argue that they were entitled to asylum, but we lack

jurisdiction to review the finding by the Board that the petitioners’ application for

asylum was untimely. See 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(3); Sanchez Jimenez v. U.S. Att’y

Gen., 492 F.3d 1223, 1231 (11th Cir. 2007). We dismiss the petition in part for

lack of jurisdiction insofar as it challenges the denial of asylum.

The petitioners also contend that they are entitled to withholding of removal,

but the record supports the decision by the Board. We review the findings of fact

by the Board under the “highly deferential substantial evidence test,” which

requires us to “view the record evidence in the light most favorable to the agency’s

decision and draw all reasonable inferences in favor of that decision.” Adefemi v.

Ashcroft, 386 F.3d 1022, 1026–27 (11th Cir. 2004) (en banc). Substantial

evidence supports the finding by the Board that the vandalism at a museum where

Munoz worked, the armed burglary of his house, and other events on which he

based his application, even when considered cumulatively, did not establish a clear

probability that Munoz would be persecuted or tortured upon returning to

2
Venezuela. Munoz failed to prove that the events were anything more than

common acts of random violence. We deny the petition in part insofar as it

challenges the denial of withholding of removal.

PETITION DISMISSED IN PART, DENIED IN PART.

3
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6268

Yanfeng US Automotive Interior Systems I LLC:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4233

Tianhai Electric North America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6800

Omron Management Center of America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5320 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to modify the authority of the 

Secretary of Defense to carry out the defense laboratory modernization 

program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 1, 2023 

Mr. BACON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to modify the authority of the Secretary of Defense to carry out the defense 

laboratory modernization program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Defense Capability De5 velopment Minor Construction Enhancement Act of 

6 2023’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5320 IH

1 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT DE2 FENSE LABORATORY MODERNIZATION PRO3 GRAM. 

4 Section 2805(g)(1) of title 10, United States Code, 

5 is amended in subparagraph (D) by inserting ‘‘or develop6 ment, production, and sustainment of combat capabilities’’ 

7 before the period at the end. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4940 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4940

To amend the Farm Credit Act of 1971 to support the commercial fishing 
                               industry.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 26, 2023

 Ms. Pingree (for herself and Mr. Higgins of Louisiana) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Farm Credit Act of 1971 to support the commercial fishing 
                               industry.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fishing Industry Credit Enhancement 
Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF CREDIT TO BUSINESSES PROVIDING SERVICES TO 
              PRODUCERS OR HARVESTERS OF AQUATIC PRODUCTS.

    (a) Farm Credit Banks.--
            (1) Eligibility for credit and financial services.--Section 
        1.9 of the Farm Credit Act of 1971 (12 U.S.C. 2017) is 
        amended--
                    (A) in paragraph (2), by striking ``or'' at the 
                end;
                    (B) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph 
                (4); and
                    (C) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following:
            ``(3) persons furnishing to producers or harvesters of 
        aquatic products services directly related to their operating 
        needs; or''.
            (2) Purposes for extensions of credit.--Section 1.11(c)(1) 
        of the Farm Credit Act of 1971 (12 U.S.C. 2019(c)(1)) is 
        amended by inserting ``and to persons furnishing services 
        directly related to the operating needs of producers or 
        harvesters of aquatic products'' after ``needs''.
    (b) Production Credit Associations.--Section 2.4(a) of the Farm 
Credit Act of 1971 (12 U.S.C. 2075(a)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(4) persons furnishing to producers or harvesters of 
        aquatic products services directly related to their operating 
        needs.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of American Tax Credit Trust, a Delaware statutory business trust Series I (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-K for the year ended March 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Salzman, Chief Executive Officer of Richman American Credit Corp., manager of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.









/s/David Salzman


David Salzman


Chief Executive Officer of Richman American


Credit Corp., Manager of the Registrant


June 28, 2011


---