alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Ronald CARROLL, Defendant-Appellant. Ronald CARROLL, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent-Respondent.

Nos. 62960, 66674.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

Sept. 26, 1995.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 30, 1995.

Application to Transfer Denied Dec. 19, 1995.

David C. Hemingway, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Cheryl A. Caponegro, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRAHAN, P.J., and CRANDALL and DOWD, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his judgment' of conviction for delivery of a controlled substance (cocaine base), in violation of § 195.211, RSMo 1991. He also appeals the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We find no error of law appears and the findings of fact of the trial court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 84.16(b). Further, we find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion and affirm by written summary order. Rule 30.25(b).
Presidential Documents

18707

Federal Register

Vol. 60, No. 70

Wednesday, April 12, 1995

Title 3—

The President

Proclamation 6784 of April 10, 1995

Pan American Day and Pan American Week, 1995

By the President of the United States of America

A Proclamation

The peoples of the Americas today live in a world of great promise. Fundamental democratic principles, such as the rule of law and free and fair

elections, are being embraced throughout the hemisphere. In perhaps one

of the most eloquent expressions of the commitment of American nations

to democratic rule, Jean Bertrand Aristide was restored to his elected position

as President of Haiti. Open markets work, democratic governments are just—

and together they offer the best hope for improving the quality of life

for all of us.

As we celebrate Pan American Day, 1995, we recognize that the nations

of the Western Hemisphere are interdependent, and our futures are intertwined. We are bound together by our shared commitment to democracy,

human rights, market economics, and effective governance. These common

ideals have enabled us to form an extraordinary network of cooperation,

encompassing endeavors from trade and environmental protection to science

and technology.

The countries of the Americas have taken important steps to open their

economies, create new jobs, and expand opportunities for their citizens.

These reforms represent a historic break with the past and begin to pave

the road toward higher standards of living in the 21st century. The North

American Free Trade Agreement marks an additional milestone on the way

to the hemispheric free trade agreement envisioned at the Summit of the

Americas.

At that summit in December of this past year, the 34 democratically elected

leaders of the hemisphere determined to make our governments more effective, our economic growth more sustainable, and our environments safer

and healthier. Our deliberations there were guided by a vital spirit of cooperation, and we continue to move forward today with the knowledge that,

now more than ever, the economic prosperity of each of our countries

depends on the progress of our neighbors.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, WILLIAM J. CLINTON, President of the United States

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim Friday, April 14, 1995,

as Pan American Day and the week of April 9 through April 15, 1995,

as Pan American Week. I urge the Governors of the 50 States, the Governor

of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the officials of other areas under

the flag of the United States to honor these observances with appropriate

ceremonies and activities.
18708 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 70 / Wednesday, April 12, 1995 / Presidential Documents

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this tenth day of

April, in the year of our Lord nineteen hundred and ninety-five, and of

the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and

nineteenth.

[FR Doc. 95–9206

Filed 4–10–95; 5:01 pm]

Billing code 3195–01–P

œ–
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with
the Quarterly  Report of B Green Innovations, Inc. Inc. (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2013, as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned,
in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certify, pursuant  to and solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



1.The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



2.The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.





|                               |     |                                        | 
|------------------------------ | --- | -------------------------------------- | 
|Date:           April 29, 2014 | By: | /s/ Jerome Mahoney                     | 
|                               |     | Jerome Mahoney                         | 
|                               |     | President, Chief Executive Officer and | 
|                               |     | Chief Financial Officer                |
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In re Paris Independent School District, et 

al.

No. 06-21-00081-CV

Original Mandamus Proceeding

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice 

Stevens, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that Relator is not entitled to the relief 

sought. Therefore, we deny the petition.

RENDERED OCTOBER 19, 2021

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-6850

United Scope LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 11

                        THE GEON COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
                 STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
              FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997, 1996 AND 1995
                      (IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)





<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                             1997          1996        1995
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE:
Number of Shares:
<S>                                                           <C>          <C>          <C> 
   Weighted average shares outstanding                        23.3         24.2         25.4
   Less unearned portion of restricted stock awards
    included in outstanding shares                             (.4)         (.3)         (.2)
                                                            ------        -----       ------
  Total weighted average common shares outstanding for
    computation of basic earnings per share                   22.9         23.9         25.2
                                                            ======        =====       ======
  Basic earnings per share                                  $  .98       $  .51       $ 1.28
                                                            ======        =====       ======

DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:
Number of Shares:
   Weighted average shares outstanding                        23.3         24.2         25.4

   Plus dilutive effect of stock options (1)                    .2           .4           .5
   Plus dilutive impact of stock awards earned under
    incentive plans (2)                                         .1            -           -
                                                            ------        -----       ------
  Total weighted average common shares and common
    equivalent shares outstanding for computation of
    diluted earnings per share                                23.6         24.6         25.9
                                                            ======        =====       ======

  Diluted earnings per share                                $  .95       $  .50       $ 1.24
                                                            ======        =====       ======
</TABLE>





Note: The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standands (SFAS) No.
128, 'Earnings per Share', in 1997. All prior year earnings per share amounts
have been restated to comply with the requirements of SFAS 128.

(1)      The dilutive effect of options is based on the treasury stock method
         using average market price for the period.

(2)      Represents the net dilutive effect of stock awards granted under
         incentive plans for the period from the time the awards were earned
         until the stock was issued to the employees
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 26, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-6397

C&U Americas, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-7444

Danieli Corporation:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended March 31, 2008 (the “Form 10-Q”) of Cardinal FinancialCorporation (the “Company”), I, Bernard H. Clineburg, Chairman and ChiefExecutive Officer, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to myknowledge:

 

(a)           the Form 10-Qfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(b)           the information contained in the Form 10-Qfairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial conditionand results of operations of the Company and its subsidiaries as of, and for,the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.

 

 
| Date: May 12, 2008 | /s/ Bernard H. Clineburg             |
|-------------------------|--------------------------------------|
|                    | Bernard H. Clineburg                 |
|                    | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
| 1.     | the      Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10Q for the quarter ended December 31,      2008 (the “Form 10Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;      and |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
| 2.     | the      information contained in the Form 10Q fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form  10Q                                           |

| Dated:      February 13, 2009 | /s/ Chester P. Aldridge                                                                           |
|-------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                          | Chester      P. Aldridge                                                                          |
|                          | Chief      Executive Officer (Principal      Executive Officer and Principal Accounting  Officer) |
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7536

BYD Motors, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPI RES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

In the Interest of D.S. and G.S., children. ) ) ) C.S., ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-1574 ) DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND ) FAMILIES, GUARDIAN ) AD LITEM PROGRAM, and J.S., ) ) Appellees. ) ) Opinion filed November 16, 2016. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Collier County; Joseph G. Foster, Judge. Richard F. Joyce of Law Office of Richard F. Joyce, P.A., Miami, for Appellant. Stephanie C. Zimmerman, Bradenton, for Appellee Department of Children and Families. Sara Goldfarb, Sanford, for Appellee Guardian Ad Litem Program. Whitney Coyne of Coyne Law, P.A., Sarasota, for Appellee J.S.- 2 - SLEET, Judge. C.S., the natural mother of D.S. and G.S., appeals an order de nying her motion to vacate an order closing the case and terminating the court's jurisdiction over the case. The proceeding that led to the entry of the order cl osing the case had been entered on the court's "own motion" without proper notice to th e mother, and the order was entered over objection by the Department of Children and Fa milies and the mother. In light of the Department's concession of error in this case, we decline to discuss all of the proceedings below. We observe only that prior to entering the order closing the case, the trial court had orally adjudicated the children depen dent, but it had failed to enter a written order adjudicating the children dependent and i t had failed to conduct a disposition hearing. The Depa rtment concedes that, under the f acts in this case, the trial court was required to conduct a disposition hearing under section 39.521, Florida Statutes (2015), before closing the case and terminating jurisd iction. Accordingly, we

reverse and remand for the trial court 1 to enter a written order adjudicating the children dependent, hold a properly noticed disposition hearing, and ent er a disposition order. The children shall remain in their current placement pending th e entry of a disposition

order.

Reversed and remanded.

NORTHCUTT and KHOUZAM, JJ., Concur.

1 A successor judge has been appointed to handle the case.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5955

Apergy ESP Systems, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-6276

CW Bearing USA, Inc: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel