alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of American Bio Medica Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 25, 2011 (the “Report”), I, Stan Cipkowski, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Stan CipkowskiStan CipkowskiChief Executive OfficerPrincipal Executive OfficerMarch 25, 2011
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5815

Magna Electronics: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_05.09.19.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXHIBIT 99.4

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

 

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,  as Enacted Pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the annual report of Enbridge Inc. (the “Corporation”) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, J. Richard Bird, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer & Corporate Development of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
| 1. | The Report   fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the   Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                      |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | The   information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material   respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the   Corporation. |

 

Dated at Calgary, Alberta, this 22nd day of February, 2011.

 

 
| “signed”                                  |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| J. Richard Bird                                     |   |
| Executive Vice President, Chief   Financial Officer |   |
| & Corporate Development                         |   |
|                                                     |        |  |

 

----
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5120 

To strengthen the prohibition on the ownership or trading of stocks in 

certain companies by certain officials of the Department of Defense. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 1, 2023 

Ms. PORTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To strengthen the prohibition on the ownership or trading 

of stocks in certain companies by certain officials of 

the Department of Defense. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Prohibit Pentagon 

5 Profiteering Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5120 IH

1 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF PROHIBITION ON OWNERSHIP 

2 OR TRADING OF STOCKS IN CERTAIN COMPA3 NIES BY CERTAIN OFFICIALS OF THE DE4 PARTMENT OF DEFENSE. 

5 Section 988(a) of title 10, United States Code, is 

6 amended by striking ‘‘if that company is one of the 10 

7 entities awarded the most amount of contract funds by 

8 the Department of Defense in a fiscal year during the five 

9 preceding fiscal years’’ and inserting ‘‘if, during the pre10 ceding calendar year, the company received more than 

11 $1,000,000,000 in revenue from the Department of De12 fense, including through one or more contracts with the 

13 Department’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 70 (Wednesday, April 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 18578]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9000]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Washington Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of 
the Washington Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 7 
p.m. and adjourn 8 p.m. on Thursday, June 8, 1995, at the 6th Avenue 
Inn, 2000 6th Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98211. The purpose of the 
meeting is to brief Committee members on procedures and presentors at 
the forum on June 9, 1995. On Friday, June 9, 1995, the Committee will 
convene at 9 a.m. and adjourn at 4 p.m. at the Convention Center, 800 
Convention Center Place, Seattle, Washington 98181. The purpose of the 
meeting is to obtain information on disproportionality in the 
administration of justice for youth.
    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation 
to the Committee, should contact Committee Chairperson William 
Wassmuth, 206-233-9136, or Philip Montez, Director of the Western 
Regional Office, 213-894-3437 (TDD 213-894-0508). Hearing-impaired 
persons who will attend the meeting and require the services of a sign 
language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least five 
(5) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, April 5, 1995.
Carol-Lee Hurley,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 95-9000 Filed 4-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 66 (Thursday, April 6, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 17614]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8302]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


Receipt of Petition for Federal Acknowledgement of Existence as 
an Indian Tribe

    This is published in the exercise of authority delegated by the 
Secretary of the Interior to the Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs by 
209 DM 8.
    Pursuant to 25 CFR 83.9 (a) (formerly 25 CFR 54.8(a)) notice is 
hereby given that the Cowasuck Band-Abenaki People, c/o Paul W. 
Pouliot, 160 Dailey Drive, Franklin, Massachusetts 02038-2951; has 
filed a petition for acknowledgment by the Secretary of the Interior 
that the group exists as an Indian Tribe. The petition was received by 
the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) on January 23, 1995, and was signed 
by members of the group's governing body.
    This is a notice of receipt of petition and does not constitute 
notice that the petition is under active consideration. Notice of 
active consideration will be sent by mail to the petitioner and other 
interested parties at the appropriate time.
    Under Sec. 83.9(a) (formerly Sec. 54.8(d)) of the Federal 
regulations, interested parties and informed parties may submit factual 
and/or legal arguments in support of or in opposition to the group's 
petition. Any information submitted will be made available on the same 
basis as other information in the BIA's files. Such submissions will be 
provided to the petitioner upon receipt by the BIA. The petitioner will 
be provided an opportunity to respond to such submissions prior to a 
final determination regarding the petitioner's status.
    The petition may be examined, by appointment, in the Department of 
the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Branch of Acknowledgment and 
Research, Room 1362-MIB, 1849 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20240, 
Phone: (202) 208-3592.

    Dated: March 23, 1995.
Ada E. Deer,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 95-8302 Filed 4-5-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-02-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

April 12, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6423

Sims Group USA Holdings Corporation, dba Sims Metal Management: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_04.15.19.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Herminio Martinez, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kohn, J.), both rendered June 25, 1987, convicting him of burglary in the second degree under indictment No. 3577/86, upon a jury verdict, and attempted burglary in the second degree under indictment No. 1101/87, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

The defendant was not deprived of a fair trial on indictment No. 3577/86 by misconduct on the part of the prosecutor during summation. Although the prosecutor may have improperly referred to the defense counsel, *inter alia,*as red faced from his inability to cast doubt on the People’s case, the court’s immediate curative instructions were sufficient to dispel whatever prejudicial effect those remarks may have had *(see, People v Jalah,*107 AD2d 762). Moreover, since the defendant did not request additional instructions or seek a mistrial, the court must be deemed to have cured the error to the defendant’s satisfaction *(see, People v Allen,*135 AD2d 823; *People v Jalah, supra).*The error in any event was harmless since we find the evidence of defendant’s guilt was overwhelming *(see, People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230).

We also find that under the circumstances, the sentences imposed were appropriate and we see no reason to disturb them *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Harwood and Miller, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
23.1

















CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM







The Board
of Directors


GeoGlobal
Resources Inc.:





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Forms
S-8 Nos. 333-74245, 333-39450, 333-67720, 333-130135, 333-136065 and 333-156429)
of GeoGlobal Resources Inc. (“the Company”) of our reports dated March 24, 2009,
with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December
31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations and
comprehensive loss, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years
in the two-year period ended December 31, 2008, and the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, which reports
appear in the December 31, 2008 annual report on Form 10-K of the
Company.




Our
report dated March 24, 2009 contains an explanatory paragraph that states that
the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and has a net capital
deficiency, which raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a
going concern. The consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedules do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of
that uncertainty.






Our
report dated March 24, 2009, on the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, expresses our opinion that the
Company did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2008 because of the effect of a material weakness on the
achievement of the objectives of the control criteria and contains an
explanatory paragraph that states the following material weaknesses have been
identified and included in management’s assessment:




·
            As
      a result of management’s philosophy and operating style, the Company did
      not maintain an effective control
environment.




·
            The
      Company has limited accounting personnel with appropriate knowledge of
      generally accepted accounting
principles.










“KPMG
LLP” (signed)





Calgary,
Canada


March 24,
2009
NO. 03-14-00711-CV

In The Court Of Appeals 

The Third District Of Texas 

Austin, Texas 

Sam Odom, 

Appellant, 

V.

DP Centex 1, Ltd, 

 Appellee. 

Appeal from the County Court at Law Number One 

Travis County, Texas 

Trial Court Case No. C-1-CV-14-009185 

JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE

ACCEPTED

03-14-00711-CV

3745168

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

1/13/2015 10:42:02 AM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/13/2015 10:42:02 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:

COME NOW, Appellant, Sam Odom (Appellant), and Appellee, DP Centex 

1, Ltd. (Appellee), and file this Joint Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice and, in 

support hereof, would respectfully show this Honorable Court the following:

1. Appellants and Appellee jointly move to dismiss this suit with prejudice.

2. All parties agree that Appellants’ claims shall be dismissed with prejudice, 

as evidenced by the signatures of the parties’ counsel below.

3. Therefore, the parties request that this Court enter an Order Dismissing this 

case with prejudice.

PRAYER

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant, Sam Odom, jointly 

with Appellee DP Centex 1, Ltd., pray that this Court dismiss this Cause of action 

with prejudice.

Respectfully Submitted,

MINERVE LAW FIRM

/S/ JAMES MINERVE

James Minerve

State Bar No 24008692

115 Saddle Blanket Trail

Buda, Texas 78610

Ofc: 888-819-1440

Cell: 210-336-5867

Fax: 888-230-6397
Attorney for Appellant Sam Odom

THE J. HYDE LAW OFFICE PLLC

/S/ DR. J. HYDE

Dr. J. Hyde

State Bar No 24027083

111 E. 17th Street #12015

Austin, Texas 78711

Tel: 512-200-4080

Fax: 512-582-8295

Attorney for Appellee DP Centex 1, Ltd.
NO. 03-14-00711-CV

In The Court Of Appeals

The Third District Of Texas 

Austin,Texas

Sam Odom,

Appellants

V.

DP Centex 1, Ltd.,

Appellee.

Appeal from the County Court at Law Number One

Travis County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. C-1-CV-14-009185

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
Came before this Court the Joint Motion to Dismiss With Prejudice filed by 

Appellant, Sam Odom and Appellee, DP Centex 1, Ltd. The Court, after 

considering the Joint Motion and pleadings is of the opinion that the Motion is well 

taken and should be, in all things, GRANTED.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this suit and all claims asserted by 

Appellant, Sam Odom against Appellee, DP Centex 1, Ltd., shall be, and the same 

hereby are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that costs of court will be paid by the party 

incurring them.

SIGNED on this _______ day of ______________________, 2015.

____________________________________

JUDGE PRESIDING
AGREED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT:

MINERVE LAW FIRM

/S/ JAMES MINERVE

James Minerve

State Bar No 24008692

115 Saddle Blanket Trail

Buda, Texas 78610

Ofc: 888-819-1440

Cell: 210-336-5867

Fax: 888-230-6397

Attorney for Plaintiff Sam Odom

THE J. HYDE LAW OFFICE PLLC

/S/ DR. J. HYDE

Dr. J. Hyde

State Bar No 24027083

111 E. 17th Street #12015

Austin, Texas 78711

Tel: 512-200-4080

Fax: 512-582-8295

Attorney for Appellee DP Centex 1, Ltd.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lucas Energy, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the three months ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William A. Sawyer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/William A. Sawyer


William A. Sawyer


Chief Executive Officer


February 14, 2011
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

April 28, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 130340 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, KING OF THE WIND FARMS, INC., Justices Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 130340 COA: 257097 Ingham CC: 03-002015-AW MICHIGAN COMMISSION OF AGRICULTURE and MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 29, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d0424 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 28, 2006

Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------



    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of SpeechSwitch, Inc. (the
"COMPANY"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007, as filed
with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, I, Bruce R.
Knef, hereby certify, pursuant to and solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



                                       By: /s/ Bruce R. Knef
                                           -------------------------------
                                               Bruce R. Knef
                                               President
                                               Chief Executive Officer and
                                               Chief Financial Officer


                                               November 14, 2007
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6701

CRRC MA Corporation:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because granting the request would undermine the objective of the Section 

301 investigation.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel