alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.4
 FIRST AMENDMENT
 Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan Agreement Life Insurance Endorsement Method Split Dollar Plan Agreement
 Index Executive Supplemental Retirement
Plan Agreement
 I.
    
    DEFINITIONS
 H.
    
    Index:
 Insurance Company:
    
    New York Life Insurance & Annuity CorporationPolicy Form:
    
    Universal LifePolicy Name:
    
    BOLIInsureds Age and Sex:
    
    47, MaleRiders:
    
    NoneRatings:
    
    NoneOption:
    
    LevelFace Amount:
    
    $3,557,481Premiums Paid:
    
    $1,293,032.81Number of Premium Payments:
    
    SingleAssumed Purchase Date:
    
    May 23, 2005
 This Amendment shall have the effect of using the Index from the previous Union Central
Life Insurance Company as well as the Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company
policies until May 23, 2005. The Index on and subsequent to May 23, 2005, shall be
based upon the New York Life Insurance Company policy set forth hereinabove as well as
the Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company policy set forth in the original June
1, 2002 Agreement.




---



##### 



Life Insurance Endowment Method Split Dollar Plan Agreement
 Insurer:
    
    New York Life Insurance & Annuity CorporationPolicy Number:
    
    56610877
 th
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
  FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK
Monessen, PA/s/
Linda Pankiewicz
    
    By:

/s/
DaCosta Smith, III
    VP HRWitness
    
    
    Title/s/
Linda Pankiewicz
    
    /s/ Richard B. BoyerWitness
    
    Richard B. Boyer 2
#### Aaron F. MANGUM, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 47876.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Nov. 23, 1993.

Susan L. Hogan, Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Joanne E. Beal, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before TURNAGE, C.J., and FENNER and ELLIS, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from denial of motion filed pursuant to Rule 24.035.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5143 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide authority to add 

additional vaccines to the list of taxable vaccines. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 4, 2023 

Mr. DOGGETT (for himself, Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania, Ms. SEWELL, Mr. 

SMUCKER, Mr. BLUMENAUER, and Mr. LARSON of Connecticut) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways 

and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

authority to add additional vaccines to the list of taxable 

vaccines. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Vaccine Access Im5 provement Act of 2023’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5143 IH

1 SEC. 2. ADDITION OF NEW VACCINES TO LIST OF TAXABLE 

2 VACCINES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4132(a)(1) of the Internal 

4 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 

5 the following new subparagraph: 

6 ‘‘(Q) Any vaccine which is not described in 

7 any other subparagraph of this paragraph and 

8 which is included on the Vaccine Injury Table 

9 under section 2114 of the Public Health Service 

10 Act.’’. 

11 (b) NOTIFICATION.—Not later than 30 days after the 

12 Secretary of Health and Human Services adds a vaccine 

13 to the Vaccine Injury Table pursuant of section 2114 of 

14 the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300aa–14), the 

15 Secretary shall notify the Secretary of the Treasury, the 

16 Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of 

17 the Senate, the Committee on Finance of the Senate, the 

18 Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of 

19 Representatives, and the Committee on Ways and Means 

20 of the House of Representatives of such designation. 

21 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 

22 (1) SALES, ETC.—The amendment made by 

23 subsection (a) shall apply to sales and uses on or 

24 after the date on which the Secretary of Health and 

25 Human Services lists any new vaccine pursuant to 

26 section 2114 of the Public Health Service Act (42 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 5143 IH

1 U.S.C. 300aa–14) for purposes of compensation for 

2 any vaccine-related injury or death through the Vac3 cine Injury Compensation Trust Fund. 

4 (2) DELIVERIES.—For purposes of paragraph 

5 (1) and section 4131 of the Internal Revenue Code 

6 of 1986, in the case of sales on or before the effec7 tive date described in such paragraph for which de8 livery is made after such date, the delivery date shall 

9 be considered the sale date. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 4, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 523-524]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-79]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee Meeting on Aircraft 
Certification Procedures Issues

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of the Federal Aviation Administration's Aviation Rulemaking 
Advisory Committee to discuss aircraft certification procedures issues.

DATES: The meeting will be held on January 19, 1995, at 9:00 a.m.
    Arrange for oral presentations by January 12, 1995.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the General Aviation 
Manufacturers Association, Suite 801, 1400 K Street, NW, Washington, DC 
20005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ms. Kathy Ball, Aircraft Certification Service (AIR-1), 800 
Independence [[Page 524]] Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20591, telephone 
(202) 267-8235.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463; 5 U.S.C. App. II), notice is 
hereby given of a meeting of the Aviation Rulemaking advisory committee 
to be held on January 19, 1995 at the General Aviation Manufacturers 
Association, Suite 801, 1400 K Street, NW, Washington, DC 20005. The 
agenda for the meeting will include:
    Opening Remarks
    Review of Action Items
    Working Group Reports
    ICPTF
    ELT
    Delegation System
    Parts
    Production Certification
    New Business
    Attendance is open to the interested public, but will be limited to 
the space available. The public must make arrangements by January 12, 
1995, to present oral statements at the meeting. The public may present 
written statements to the committee at any time by providing 25 copies 
to the Assistant Executive Director for Aircraft Certification 
Procedures or by bringing the copies to him at the meting. Arrangements 
may be made by contacting the person listed under the heading FOR 
FURTHER INFORMATION COINTACT.
    Sign and oral interpretation can be made available at the meeting, 
as well as an assistive listening device, if requested 10 calendar days 
before the meeting.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on December 23, 1994.
Daniel P. Salvano,
Assistant Executive Director for Aircraft Certification Procedures, 
Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 95-79 Filed 1-3-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5983

Scosche Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

TYVAL ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY, LLC,

Appellant,

v.

AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-1886

[October 28, 2021]

Appeal from the State of Florida, Agency for Health Care 

Administration; L.T. Case Nos. 2019014536, 2019014994, 19-5096, 19-

6305, 2019014537, 20-0014 and 2019002790.

John E. Terrel of Law Office of John E. Terrel, P.A., Tallahassee, for 

appellant.

Nicholas A. Merlin and Tracy Cooper George, Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CONNER, C.J., MAY and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-6877

Sears Holdings Management Corporation:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 67 (Friday, April 7, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17788-17789]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8613]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-5185-4]


Revocation of Sulfide Waiver Granted on April 17, 1986, to W.B. 
Place Tannery Discharging to City of Hartford Subject to Pretreatment 
Standards Under 40 CFR Part 425

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The City of Hartford (hereinafter referred to as 
``Hartford''), Wisconsin, operates a publicly owned treatment works 
(POTW) which accepts wastewater from a leather tanning and finishing 
facility which is subject to pretreatment standards at 40 CFR part 425. 
Pursuant to 40 CFR 425.04(c) Hartford certified to the U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) on April 11, 1984, that 
discharge of sulfide from the tannery would not interfere with the 
operation of the POTW. On April 17, 1986, U.S. EPA placed notice at 51 
FR 13092-13093 stating that, pursuant to 40 CFR part 425, the following 
tannery would not be subject to the categorical sulfide pretreatment 
standard: W.B. Place Tannery, 368 West Summer Street, Hartford, 
Wisconsin.
    On August 31, 1994, Hartford requested that U.S. EPA rescind the 
categorical sulfide pretreatment waiver [[Page 17789]] granted to W.B. 
Place Tannery. The affected tannery was informed of Hartford's 
intention.
    Pursuant to 40 CFR 425.04(d) and in consideration of the 
representations and information provided by Hartford, I hereby, rescind 
the April 17, 1986, waiver of the sulfide requirements set forth in the 
Leather Tanning and Finishing Pretreatment Standards for the delineated 
tannery in Hartford, Wisconsin. As provided in 40 CFR 425.04(d)(2), the 
affected tannery must comply with the categorical sulfide standards no 
later than 18 months following the publication of this notice or at an 
earlier date established by the City.

DATES: This action is effective as of April 7, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matthew Gluckman, Pretreatment 
Coordinator, Permits Section, Water Quality Branch, U.S. EPA--Region 5, 
at (312) 886-6089.

    Dated: March 10, 1995.
David A. Ullrich,
Acting Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 95-8613 Filed 4-6-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Exhibit 15.1











Consent of Independent registered public accounting firm




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form F-3 (Registration Nos. 333-160683 and No. 333-174142) and the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-96630, 333-113932, 333-123410 333-132649 and 333-158476) of our reports dated April 2, 2012, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. included in Amendment No. 1 to its Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011.


/s/ Kost Forer Gabbay and Kasierer



Kost Forer Gabbay and Kasierer

A Member of Ernst & Young Global





Tel-Aviv, Israel


April 3, 2012
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6403

Hayden Products LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

DANIEL DAVID FERRIS

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 8

- 00222

- CR

Appeal from the

243 rd District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20170D00570 )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no reversible

error in the judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be

certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 11 TH OF DECEMBER, 2020.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 23

- 30320 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus **Brandon Fontnett,** Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 6:21

- CR

- 177

- 8

**_________________ _____________**  Before **Wiener, Stewart,** and **Douglas,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *****
Defendant

– Appellant Brandon Fontnett appeals the 151

- month sentence imposed following his guilty

- plea conviction for possession with the intent to distribute cocaine. In particular, Fontnett challenges the district court’s use of his prior conviction for attempted possession with intent to distribute cocaine to qualify him as a career offender . As he argue d in the

**_____________________**

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir**

**. R** 

**.** 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 2, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-30320 Document: 00517017689 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/02/2024No. 23

- 30320

2 district court, Fontnett asserts that (1) inchoate offenses are not included in the definition of a “controlled substance offense” under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(b) and (2) guidelines commentary to the contrary is not entitled to deference.
The Government has filed an unopposed motion for summary affirmance or, in the alternative, for an extension of time to file its brief. Fontnett correctly concedes that his claim is foreclosed by United States v. Vargas , 74 F.4th 673 (5th Cir. 2023) (en banc ) , petition for cert. filed ( U.S. Oct. 23, 2023 ) (No. 23

- 5875)

. In that case, we determined that the commentary warranted deference and “ reaffirm[ed] our longstanding precedent that inchoate offenses . . . are included in the definition of ‘controlled substa nce offense.’” Vargas , 74 F.4th at 698

. When, as here, “there can be no substantial question as to the outcome of the case,” summary disposition is appropriate. Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis , 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969). T he motion for summary a ffirmance is **GRANTED** , the alternative motion for an extension of time is **DENIED** , and the district court’s judgment is **AFFIRMED**

. Case: 23-30320 Document: 00517017689 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/02/2024
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7572

SGRE, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

IN THE MATTER OF THE 

PETITION OF JERMAINE 

CARTER FOR A WRIT OF 

MANDAMUS

§

§ No. 174, 2022

§

§

§ Court Below–Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§ 

§ 

§ Cr. ID No. 0810013184 (N)

§ 

§

Submitted: July 12, 2022

Decided: July 18, 2022

ORDER

On June 29, 2022, the Chief Deputy Court Clerk issued a notice, sent by 

certified mail, directing the appellant, Jermaine Carter, to show cause why his appeal 

should not be dismissed for his failure to pay the Supreme Court filing fee or file a 

motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Carter received the notice on July 1, 2022. A 

timely response to the notice to show cause was due on or before July 11, 2022. To 

date, Carter has not paid the Supreme Court filing fee, filed a motion to proceed in 

forma pauperis, or responded to the notice to show cause. Dismissal of this action 

is therefore deemed to be unopposed.
2

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, under Supreme Court 

Rules 3(b)(2) and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gary F. Traynor

Justice