alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Organization Name:

Note: Representatives submitting on behalf of an organization must enter information below.

Requestor Representative:

Section 301 Investigation: China's Acts, Policies, and Practices Related to Technology 

Transfer, Intellectual Property, and Innovation - Form to Request Exclusion of Product

When submitting a product exclusion request using this form, enter the specified 

information in the following fields and explain the basis and rationale for your statements. 

By completing this form, you certify that the information provided is complete and 

correct to the best of your knowledge. 

1. Indicate whether the comment contains business confidential information (BCI), is a public

document, or is a public version of a BCI document.

3.

2. Please provide a complete and detailed description of the product of concern:

4.

5. Requestor's relationship to the product:

CONTINUED BELOW

*

10-digit HTSUS item number* for product you wish to address in this product exclusion request:

Use numerical characters only with no special characters (example: 1023456789). For help in finding 

the HTSUS item number associated with your product, see https://hts.usitc.gov/

1

7.

6. Does this submission in regulations.gov include additional attachments?

Please indicate whether any additional attachment contains business confidential

information (BCI), is a public document, or is a public version of a BCI document.

VERSION 1

Requestor Information

Requestor Name (Last, First):

Public Version of BCI

RC152, 15.7 ton Capacity, 2.00 in Stroke, General Purpose Hydraulic Cylinder; Maximum Operating 

Pressure psi: 10000; Weight Kgs: 4,1; Oil Capacity Advance cm3: 104; Stroke Ranges mm: 48 - 94

8412210075 Schmidt, Jackie Enerpac Jackie SchmidtImporter Yes Contains BCI
END 2

8. Is this product, or a comparable product, available from sources in the United States?:

VERSION 1

11. Please provide information in support your request, taking account of the instructions

provided in Section B of the Federal Register notice (note: text entered below can extend

beyond the apparent size of this box).

9. Is this product, or a comparable product, available from sources in third countries?:

10. Please provide the value and quantity (with units) of the Chinese-origin product of concern

that you purchased for each calendar year specified. Limit this figure to the products

purchased by your firm (or by members of your trade association) alone. Please provide 

estimates if precise figures are unavailable.

2016 Value:

2015 Value:

2017 Value:

2016 Quantity:

2015 Quantity:

2017 Quantity:

No No BCI BCI BCI BCI BCI BCI

See addendum for additional information.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5090

Enerpac:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-01-00451-CR

Donald Lynn Williams, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 49,709, HONORABLE JOE CARROLL, JUDGE PRESIDING

After revoking appellant Donald Lynn Williams’s deferred adjudication community

supervision, the district court adjudged him guilty of indecency with a child by contact and sentenced

him to twelve years in prison. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 21.11 (West Supp. 2002). Appellant’s

court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that this appeal is frivolous and without merit. The

brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a

professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be

advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim.

App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 

S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim.

App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). 

A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant, and appellant was advised of his

right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.
2

We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous

and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. Counsel’s

motion to withdraw is granted.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

__________________________________________

Mack Kidd, Justice

Before Justices Kidd, Yeakel and Patterson

Affirmed

Filed: January 10, 2002

Do Not Publish
exv10w27









Exhibit 10.27




Amendment

To

Employment Agreement




WHEREAS, an Employment Agreement effective as of the 12th day of August, 2009 as amended
effective April 1, 2011 (the “Agreement”) was entered into by and between Arcadia Resources, Inc.,
a Nevada corporation (“Employer”) and Steven L. Zeller (“Executive”); and



WHEREAS, the Agreement may be amended or modified by written agreement executed by the parties
or their respective successors and legal representatives; and



WHEREAS, the parties now believe it is mutually beneficial to amend a certian provision of the
Agreement through this Amendment (“Amendment”) to reflect an extension of a temporary reduction in
the Executive’s annual base salary.



NOW THEREFORE, Employer and Executive hereby agree, effective as of April 1, 2011, to amend
the Agreement as follows:



1. Subsection (a) of Section 3 (Compensation) of the Agreement is amended hereby to read in its
entirety as follows:




(a) Base Salary. During the Employment Period, the Executive shall receive an annual Base Salary of
$250,000 payable in accordance with the regular payroll practices of Employer. The Executive’s
base salary shall be reviewed annually by Employer, in accordance with Employer’s standard
practices for executives generally, and may be increased, but not decreased, as determined by the
Board of Directors, in their sole discretion, or by any committee of the Board of Directors to
which such authority has been delegated. The parties acknowledge that as an accommodation to the
Employer, Executive agreed effective April 1, 2009, and further agreed effective April 1, 2010 and
April 1, 2011, to temporarily receive a ten percent (10%) reduction in his Base Salary (the
“Reduced Base”). The amount of Executive’s Reduced Base salary is presently $225,000 annually and
shall remain in effect until the Base Salary is restored by the Board of Directors. All severance
payments due to Executive under this Agreement shall be calculated based on Executive’s Base
Salary, not Executive’s Reduced Base.



 


 









 








IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive has hereunto set the Executive’s hand and, pursuant to the
authorization of the Board of Directors, Employer has caused this Amendment to be executed in its
name and on its behalf, all as of the day and year first written above following the preamble.



	 	 	 	 	 

	ARCADIA RESOURCES, INC.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Marvin R. Richardson
 

Marvin R. Richardson
	 	 
	 

	 	Title: President and Chief Executive Officer	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	EXECUTIVE	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Steven L. Zeller	 	 
	 	 	 
	Steven L. Zeller
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.2

           NUMBER                   INCO                       SHARES
            0001                    HOMES                     **2,340**

THIS CERTIFIES THAT

                          NORRIS LIVING TRUST
                          17555 WEDDINGTON STREET
                          ENCINO, CA 91316

IS THE OWNER OF
                    **TWO THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED FORTY**

FULLY AND PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE SERIES A CUMULATIVE PREFERRED
STOCK PAR VALUE OF $0.01 PER SHARE OF
                            INCO HOMES CORPORATION

HEREINAFTER DESIGNATED "THE CORPORATION", TRANSFERABLE ON THE SHARE REGISTER OF
THE CORPORATION UPON SURRENDER OF THIS CERTIFICATE PROPERLY ENDORSED OR
ASSIGNED.

     This certificate and the shares represented thereby shall be held subject
to all of the provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation and the By-laws of
said Corporation, a copy of each of which is on file of the office of the
Corporation, and made a part hereof as fully as though the provisions of said
Certificate of Incorporation and By-laws were imprinted in full on this
certificate, to all of which the holder of this certificate, by acceptance
hereof, assents and agrees to be bound.
     Any stockholder may obtain from the principal office of the Corporation,
upon request and without charge, a statement of the number of shares
constituting each class or series of stock and the designations thereof; and a
copy of the powers, designations, preferences and relative, participation,
optional or other special rights of each class of stock or series thereof and
the qualifications, limitations or restrictions of such preferences and/or
rights and the By-laws.
THE ADDRESS OF THE PRINCIPAL OFFICE OF THE CORPORATIONS IS
        WITNESS THE SEAL OF THE CORPORATION AND THE SIGNATURES OF ITS DULY
AUTHORIZED OFFICERS.
DATED:  DECEMBER 30, 1997

      SECRETARY                                        PRESIDENT

/s/ LYNN C. PARKES                               /s/ IRA C. NORRIS

<PAGE>

THESE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 AND
MAY BE REOFFERED AND SOLD ONLY IF SO REGISTERED OR IF AN EXEMPTION FROM
REGISTRATION IS AVAILABLE.









      For Value Received,______hereby sell, assign and transfer unto

   PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER
       IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Shares
represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and
appoint

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Attorney
to transfer the said Shares on the books of the within named Corporation with
full power of substitution in the premises.

      Dated                      19
           ----------------------   -------
           In presence of

                                  -------------------------------------
----------------------------------
FedFirst Financial Corporation
10-Q





EXHIBIT
10.3








AMENDMENT
TO THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN


RICHARD
B. BOYER AND EXCHANGE UNDERWRITERS, INC.





WHEREAS, Richard B. Boyer (the
“Executive”) entered into an employment agreement with Exchange Underwriters,
Inc., a fully owned subsidiary of First Federal Savings Bank, effective June 1,
2008 (the “Employment Agreement”); and





WHEREAS , the Board of
Directors of Exchange Underwriters, Inc. has resolved to amend the Employment
Agreement effective April 1, 2010, to reflect an adjustment in the Executive’s
annual base salary; and





WHEREAS, the Employment
Agreement was further amended to provide that modifications to Executive’s base
salary in the future will not require an amendment to the Employment
Agreement.





NOW, THEREFORE, the Executive
and Exchange Underwriters, Inc. hereby consent to the following:





Effective
April 1, 2010, Section 4 of the Employment Agreement shall be deleted in its
entirety and replaced with the following new Section 4:





“Exchange
agrees to pay Executive an annual salary of $167,500, payable in accordance with
the customary payroll practices of Exchange.   The Executive’s
annual salary, as the same may be modified from time to time, is referred to in
this Agreement as the “Base Salary.””








ATTEST:
            
            
            EXCHANGE
      UNDERWRITERS, INC./s/
      Diane Merrick
            
            
            /s/
      John J. LaCarteDiane
      Merrick
            
            
            John
      J. LaCarte/s/
      Richard B. BoyerRichard
      B. Boyer
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5226 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to enter into an agreement with a university affiliated research center to conduct research and analysis on 

multipolar deterrence and escalation dynamics. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 18, 2023 

Mr. BACON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to enter into an agreement with a university affiliated research center to conduct research and analysis on multipolar deterrence and 

escalation dynamics. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Multipolar Deterrence 

5 Research and Analysis Act of 2023’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5226 IH

1 SEC. 2. RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS ON MULTIPOLAR DETER2 RENCE AND ESCALATION DYNAMICS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the 

4 date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense 

5 shall seek to enter into an agreement with a university 

6 affiliated research center with expertise in strategic deter7 rence to conduct research and analysis on multipolar de8 terrence and escalation dynamics. 

9 (b) ELEMENTS.—The research and analysis con10 ducted under subsection (a) shall include assessment of 

11 the following: 

12 (1) Implications for strategic deterrence and al13 lied assurance given the emergence of a second near14 peer nuclear power. 

15 (2) Potential alternative conventional, strategic, 

16 and nuclear force structures to optimize deterrence 

17 of two near- peer nuclear powers. 

18 (3) The contribution made by countervailing 

19 nonstrategic capabilities to strategic deterrence. 

20 (4) Escalation patterns arising from Russia’s 

21 Strategic Operations to Destroy Critically Important 

22 Targets operational concept and response options for 

23 the United States. 

24 (5) Multilateral efforts that could contribute to 

25 multipolar strategic deterrence and escalation dy26 namics. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 5226 IH

1 (6) Capabilities and operations sufficient to as2 sure European and Pacific allies. 

3 (c) REPORT REQUIRED.— 

4 (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than March 1, 

5 2025, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the 

6 congressional defense committees a report that in7 cludes the results of the research and analysis con8 ducted under subsection (a). 

9 (2) FORM.—The report under paragraph (1) 

10 shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may in11 clude a classified annex. 

12 (d) CONGRESSIONAL DEFENSE COMMITTEES DE13 FINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘congressional defense 

14 committees’’ has the meaning given that term in section 

15 101(a)(16) of title 10, United States Code. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1966

CARL G. ELY; GILDA ELY, Administrators of the

Estate of Carl G. Ely, Jr., deceased,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

FORTIER LOSS CONTROL CONSULTANTS,

INCORPORATED,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. Glen M. Williams, Senior

District Judge. (CA-02-25-2)

Submitted: January 29, 2003 Decided: March 12, 2003

Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carl E. McAfee, MCAFEE LAW FIRM, P.C., Norton, Virginia, for

Appellants. Donald W. Huffman, HUFFMAN & NIXON, P.C., Roanoke,

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Carl G. Ely and Gilda Ely appeal the district court’s order

granting Fortier Loss Control Consultants’ motion to dismiss their

wrongful death action. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. We note that the facts relied on by the district

court in reaching its conclusion were contained in the complaint.

Based on those facts, it is clear that Plaintiffs’ decedent was

contributorily negligent, and his negligence was the proximate

cause of his fatal accident. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. See Ely v. Fortier Loss Control

Consultants, Inc., No. CA-02-25-2 (W.D. Va. Aug. 2, 2002). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6087

Kyungshin Lear Sales and Engineering LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

“Made in China 2025” or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          75,765
<SECURITIES>                                    97,564
<RECEIVABLES>                                   67,783
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (727)
<INVENTORY>                                     51,409
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               335,165
<PP&E>                                         101,528
<DEPRECIATION>                                  44,607
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 426,821
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          122,044
<BONDS>                                        172,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            28
<OTHER-SE>                                     126,865
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   426,821
<SALES>                                        220,051
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               220,450
<CGS>                                          143,105
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  143,914
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                63,552
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,718
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,236
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,573
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,573
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .29


</TABLE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5845

Scosche Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel