NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JORGE JAVIER PINEDA

- ROJAS,

Petitioner,

v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. No. 17

- 71775 Agency No. A200

- 884

- 739

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted July 7, 2022 * * Seattle, Washington Before: CLIFTON and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and SEEBORG, ** * District Judge. Jorge P ineda

- Rojas petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*** The Honorable Richard Seeborg, Chief United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation. 

# FILED

JUL 11 2022 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2

relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We review denials of asylum, withholding of removal, and denials of CAT relief for substantial evidence. Guo v.
Sessions , 897 F.3d 1208, 1212 (9th Cir. 2018). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition.
1. Pineda

- Rojas waived his challenge to the BIA’s denial of asylum. To be eligible for asylum , an asylum application must be filed within one year after the alien’s arrival in the United States

. 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(2)(B) ; see also Al Ramahi v.
Holder , 725 F.3d 1133, 1134

– 35 (9th Cir. 2013)

. The B IA affirmed the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) finding that Pineda

- Rojas failed to file his asylum application within
the one

- year limitation period . On appeal Pineda

- Rojas does not contest this holding , thus dooming his challenge to th e BIA’s denial of asylum

. See Martinez

Serrano v. INS , 94 F.3d 1256, 1259

– 60 (9th Cir. 1996) (issues not raised in a party’s opening brief are waived). 2. The BIA’s denial of withholding of removal is supported by substantial
evidence. To qualify for withholding of rem oval, an alien must show that he will be persecuted because of a protected ground

. 8 U.S.C. § 1231( b)(3)(A); 8 C.F.R. § 208.16(b). The BIA found that Pineda

- Rojas failed to demonstrate persecution based on a protected ground. The sole evidence Pineda

- Roj as points to is a 1988 shooting wh ere gang members allegedly shot at him as part of a robbery . But Pineda

- Rojas fails to establish that any past or future violence is connect ed to a3

protected ground. 1 Indeed , when the IJ asked Pineda

- Rojas, “ So you’re afraid of just the general violence in [ your hometown] , correct?” Pineda responded, “Yes.”
Such a generalized fear of violence fail s to demonstrate persecution based on a protected ground. See Zetino v. Holder , 622 F.3d 1007, 1 016 (9 th Cir. 2010) (an applicant’s “desire to be free from harassment by criminals . . . bears no nexus to a protected ground”). Substantial evidence thus supports the BIA’s denial of withholding of removal.
3. Substantial evidence also supports the BIA’s denial of CAT relief. The
BIA concluded that Pineda

- Rojas failed to establish that it was “more likely than not” that he would be tortured in Mexico. See 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(2 )

. On appeal , Pineda

- Rojas provides two sentences of argument say ing he will be “targeted” in
Mexico

. But nothing in Pineda

- Rojas’s testimony “compel [s] the conclusion that [ he ] would be tortured if returned.” Almaghzar v. Gonzales , 457 F.3d 915, 922

– 23 (9th Cir. 2006) (emphasis added)

. Because Pineda

- Rojas’s evidence fail s to compel a finding that it is “more likely than not” that he would be tortured in Mexico, substantial evidence supports the BIA’s denial of CAT relief.
DENIED.

1 Before the BIA, Pineda

- Rojas argued that “persecutors were seeking him out because of his immutable traits and characteris tics.” The BIA properly found that this general statement was conclusory and unsupported by evidence.