Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 75 / Wednesday, April 19, 1995 / Proposed Rules 19553

in accordance with the Accomplishment

Instructions, section 2.1 PART ONE,

paragraphs A., B., C., D., E. and F., of British

Aerospace Preliminary Technical Leaflet

(PTL) 501, dated May 1, 1994.

(b) If drive screws or blind rivets are found

installed, or if the inspection holes are found

to be oversized, during the inspection

required by paragraph (a) of this AD, at the

next scheduled engine removal, but no later

than 12 months after the effective date of this

AD, perform a nondestructive test (NDT) to

detect discontinuities (i.e., cracks, corrosion,

and mechanical damage) at inspection holes;

rework the hole or replace the ‘‘W’’ frame

fitting with a new or serviceable part; and

perform the specified follow-on actions; in

accordance with the Accomplishment

Instructions, section 2.2 PART TWO,

paragraphs A., B., C., D., E., and F., of British

Aerospace Preliminary Technical Leaflet

(PTL) 501, dated May 1, 1994.

(c) An alternative method of compliance or

adjustment of the compliance time that

provides an acceptable level of safety may be

used if approved by the Manager,

Standardization Branch, ANM–113, FAA,

Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators

shall submit their requests through an

appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance

Inspector, who may add comments and then

send it to the Manager, Standardization

Branch, ANM–113.

Note 2: Information concerning the

existence of approved alternative methods of

compliance with this AD, if any, may be

obtained from the Standardization Branch,

ANM–113.

(d) Special flight permits may be issued in

accordance with sections 21.197 and 21.199

of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR

21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to

a location where the requirements of this AD

can be accomplished.

Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 13,

1995.

John J. Hickey,

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.

[FR Doc. 95–9625 Filed 4–18–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–U

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 94–ACE–17]

Proposed Amendment to Class E

Airspace; Washington, IA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

SUMMARY: This notice proposes to

amend the Class E airspace area at

Washington, IA. The development of a

new standard instrument approach

procedure (SIAP) at Washington

Municipal Airport, Washington, IA, has

made the proposal necessary. The

intended effect of this proposal is to

provide controlled airspace for aircraft

executing the SIAP at Washington, IA.

DATES: Comments must be received on

or before May 30, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on the

proposal in triplicate to: Manager, Air

Traffic Operations Branch, ACE–530,

Federal Aviation Administration,

Docket No. 94–ACE–17, 601 East 12th

Street, Kansas City, MO 64106.

The official docket may be examined

in the Office of the Assistant Chief

Counsel for the Central Region at the

same address between 9 a.m. and 3

p.m., Monday through Friday, except

Federal holidays.

An informal docket may also be

examined during normal business hours

in the office of the Manager, Air Traffic

Operations Branch, Air Traffic Division,

at the address listed above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kathy Randolph, ACE–530c, Federal

Aviation Administration, 601 East 12th

Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106;

telephone: (816) 426–3408.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

Interested parties are invited to

participate in this proposed rulemaking

by submitting such written data, views,

or arguments as they may desire.

Comments that provide the factual basis

supporting the views and suggestions

presented are particularly helpful in

developing reasoned regulatory

decisions on the proposal. Comments

are specifically invited on the overall

regulatory, economic, environmental,

and energy-related aspects of the

proposal. Communications should

identify the airspace docket number and

be submitted in triplicate to the address

listed above. Commenters wishing the

FAA to acknowledge receipt of their

comments on this notice must submit

with those comments a self-addressed,

stamped postcard on which the

following statement is made:

‘‘Comments to Docket No. 94–ACE–17.’’

The postcard will be date/time stamped

and returned to the commenter. All

communications received on or before

the closing date for comments will be

considered before taking action on the

proposed rule. The proposal contained

in this notice may be changed in light

of comments received. All comments

submitted will be available for

examination in the Rules Docket both

before and after the closing date for

comments. A report summarizing each

substantive public contact with FAA

personnel concerned with this

rulemaking will be filed in the docket.

Availability of NPRMs

Any person may obtain a copy of this

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM)

by submitting a request to the Federal

Aviation Administration, Office of

Public Affairs, Attention: Public Inquiry

Center, APA–230, 800 Independence

Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591, or

by calling (202) 267–3484.

Communications must identify the

notice number of this NPRM. Persons

interested in being placed on a mailing

list for future NPRMs should also

request a copy of Advisory Circular No.

11–2A, which describes the application

procedures.

The Proposal

The FAA is considering an

amendment to part 71 of the Federal

Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 71) to

provide additional controlled airspace

for a new Instrument Flight Rules (IFR)

procedure at the Washington Municipal

Airport. The additional airspace would

segregate aircraft operating under VFR

conditions from aircraft operating under

IFR procedures. The area would be

depicted on appropriate aeronautical

charts thereby enabling pilots to

circumnavigate the area or otherwise

comply with IFR procedures. Class E

airspace designations for airspace areas

extending upward from 700 feet or more

above the surface of the earth are

published in paragraph 6005 of FAA

Order 7400.9B, dated July 18, 1994, and

effective September 16, 1994, which is

incorporated by reference in 14 CFR

71.1. The Class E airspace designation

listed in this document would be

published subsequently in the Order.

The FAA has determined that this

proposed regulation only involves an

established body of technical

regulations for which frequent and

routine amendments are necessary to

keep them operationally current.

Therefore, this proposed regulation—(1)

is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’

under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not

a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44

FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)

does not warrant preparation of a

Regulatory Evaluation as the anticipated

impact is so minimal. Since this is a

routine matter that will only affect air

traffic procedures and air navigation, it

is certified that this proposed rule will

not have a significant economic impact

on a substantial number of small entities

under the criteria of the Regulatory

Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

Airspace, Incorporation by reference,

Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

Accordingly, pursuant to the

authority delegated to me, the Federal
19554 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 75 / Wednesday, April 19, 1995 / Proposed Rules

1 Among other things, the pre-amendment

guidance consists of those portions of the proposed

post-1987 ozone and carbon monoxide policy that

concern RACT, 52 FR 45044 (November 24, 1987);

‘‘Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints,

Deficiencies, and Deviations, Clarification to

Appendix D of November 24, 1987 Federal Register

Notice’’ (Blue Book) (notice of availability was

published in the Federal Register on May 25, 1988);

and the existing control technique guidelines

(CTGs).

2The LA Basin and the Ventura County Area

retained their designations of nonattainment and

were classified by operation of law pursuant to

sections 107(d) and 181(a) upon the date of

enactment of the CAA. See 55 FR 56694 (November

6, 1991).

Aviation Administration proposes to

amend part 71 of the Federal Aviation

Regulations (14 CFR part 71) as follows:

PART 71—[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for part 71

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 1348(a), 1354(a),

1510; E.O. 10854; 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–

1963 Comp., p. 389; 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 14 CFR

11.69.

§ 71.1 [Amended]

2. The incorporation by reference in

14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation

Administration Order 7400.9B, Airspace

Designations and Reporting Points,

dated July 18, 1994, and effective

September 16, 1994, is amended as

follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas

extending from 700 feet or more above

the surface of the earth.

* * * * *

ACE IA E5 Washington, IA [Revised]

Washington Municipal Airport, IA.

(Lat. 41°16′34′′N, long. 91°40′25′′W)

That airspace extending upward from 700

feet above the surface within 7-mile radius of

the Washington Municipal airport and within

3.5 miles each side of the 191° bearing from

the airport extending from the 7-mile radius

to 13 miles south of the airport.

* * * * *

Herman J. Lyons, Jr.,

Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, Central

Region.

[FR Doc. 95–9643 Filed 4–18–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[CA 144–4–6973a; FL–5194–5]

Approval and Promulgation of

Implementation Plans; California State

Implementation Plan Revision, South

Coast Air Quality Management District

and Ventura County Air Pollution

Control District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve

revisions to the California State

Implementation Plan (SIP) which

concern the control of volatile organic

compound (VOC) emissions from bakery

ovens and the coating of metal parts and

products.

The intended effect of proposing

approval of these rules is to regulate

emissions of VOCs in accordance with

the requirements of the Clean Air Act,

as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act).

EPA’s final action on this notice of

proposed (NPRM) will incorporate these

rules into the federally approved SIP. In

addition, final action on one of these

rules (South Coast Air Quality

Management District’s Rule 1153) will

serve as a final determination that a

deficiency in the rule has been corrected

and that any sanctions or Federal

Implementation Plan (FIP) obligations

are permanently stopped. An Interim

Final Determination published in

today’s Federal Register will defer the

imposition of sanctions until EPA takes

final rulemaking action on this rule.

EPA has evaluated each of these rules

and is proposing to approve them under

provisions of the CAA regarding EPA

action on SIP submittals, SIPs for

national primary and secondary ambient

air quality standards and plan

requirements for nonattainment areas.

DATES: Comments must be received on

or before May 19, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed

to: Daniel A. Meer, Rulemaking Section

[A–5–3], Air and Toxics Division, U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency,

Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San

Francisco, CA 94105–3901.

Copies of the rules and EPA’s

evaluation report of each rule are

available for public inspection at EPA’s

Region 9 office during normal business

hours. Copies of the submitted rules are

also available for inspection at the

following locations:

California Air Resources Board,

Stationary Source Division, Rule

Evaluation Section, 2020 ‘‘L’’ Street,

Sacramento, CA 95814.

South Coast Air Quality Management

District, 21865 E. Copley Drive,

Diamond Bar, CA 91765–4182.

Ventura County Air Pollution Control

District, 669 County Square Drive,

Second Floor, Ventura, CA 93003.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Christine Vineyard, Rulemaking Section

[A–5–3], Air and Toxics Division, U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency,

Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San

Francisco, CA 94105–3901, (415) 744–

1197.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Applicability

The rules being proposed for approval

into the California SIP include: South

Coast Air Quality Management District

(SCAQMD) Rule 1153, Commercial

Bakery Ovens; and Ventura County Air

Pollution Control District (VCAPCD)

Rule 74.12, Surface Coatings of Metal

Parts and Products. These rules were

submitted by the California Air

Resources Board to EPA on February 24,

1995.

Background

On March 3, 1978, EPA promulgated

a list of ozone nonattainment areas

under the provisions of the Clean Air

Act, as amended in 1977 (1977 CAA or

pre-amended Act), that included the Los

Angeles-South Coast Air Basin (LA

Basin) and the Ventura County Area. 43

FR 8964; 40 CFR 81.305. Because these

areas were unable to meet the statutory

attainment date of December 31, 1982,

California requested under section

172(a)(2), and EPA approved, an

extension of the attainment date to

December 31, 1987. 40 CFR 52.222. On

May 26, 1988, EPA notified the

Governor of California, pursuant to

section 110(a)(2)(H) of the pre-amended

Act, that the above districts’ portions of

the California SIP were inadequate to

attain and maintain the ozone standard

and requested that deficiencies in the

existing SIP be corrected (EPA’s SIPCall). On November 15, 1990, the Clean

Air Act Amendments of 1990 were

enacted. Pub. L. 101–549, 104 Stat.

2399, codified at 42 U.S.C. 7401–7671q.

In amended section 182(a)(2)(A) of the

CAA, Congress statutorily adopted the

requirement that nonattainment areas

fix their deficient reasonably available

control technology (RACT) rules for

ozone and established a deadline of May

15, 1991 for states to submit corrections

of those deficiencies.

Section 182(a)(2)(A) applies to areas

designated as nonattainment prior to

enactment of the amendments and

classified as marginal or above as of the

date of enactment. It requires such areas

to adopt and correct RACT rules

pursuant to pre-amended section 172(b)

as interpreted in pre-amendment

guidance.1 EPA’s SIP-Call used that

guidance to indicate the necessary

corrections for specific nonattainment

areas. The LA Basin is classified as

extreme and the Ventura County Area is

classified as severe; 2 therefore, these

areas were subject to the RACT fix-up