alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6573

Johnson Level & Tool Mfg. Co, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**




**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**









In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Universal Capital Management, Inc.
      (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 31, 2005 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Joseph T. Drennan, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my
      knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.









/s/
      Joseph T. Drennan


Joseph
      T.
      Drennan


Treasurer
      (Principal Financial Officer)


December
      15, 2005










The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and shall not be deemed
      filed
      by the Company for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act
      of
      1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to liability under that Section.
      This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into
      any
      filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act except to the extent
      that this certification is expressly incorporated by reference into any such
      filing.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 69 (Tuesday, April 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18427-18428]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8817]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Graduate Education and Research 
Development; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Graduate Education and Research 
Development.
    Date and Time: April 25-27, 1995; 8:30 a.m.-5:00 p.m.
    Place: St. James Hotel, 950 24th St., NW., Board Room, 
Washington, DC 20037.
    Type of Meeting:  Closed.
    Contact Person: Carolyn Lyons Piper, Asst. Program Director, 
4201 Wilson Blvd. Room [[Page 18428]] 907, Arlington, VA 22230, 
Telephone: 306-1696.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to the NATO Postdoctoral Fellowship 
Program (NATO).
    Agenda: Review and Evaluate NATO proposals.
    Reasons for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are within exemptions 4 and 6 of 5 U.S.C. 
552b(c)(4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.
    Reasons for Late Notice: Complications with meeting logistics.

    Dated: April 5, 1995.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-8817 Filed 4-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
<PAGE>   1

EXHIBIT 23.1


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
American Bio Medica Corporation on Form S-3 (File No. 333-16535) of our report,
dated June 17, 1999 (with respect to Note H[4] July 1, 1999) on our audits of
the financial statements of the Company as of April 30, 1999 and for the years
ended April 30, 1999 and 1998 which report is included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB. We also consent to the reference of our firm under the caption
"Experts" in the prospectus.





                                           Richard A. Eisner & Company, LLP



New York, New York
July 27, 1999
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 65 (Wednesday, April 5, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 17369]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8242]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act

    In accordance with Departmental policy, notice is hereby given that 
on March 16, 1995, a proposed Amendment to a previously-entered partial 
consent decree and judgment in United States, et al. v. Thomas Solvent, 
et al., Civil Action No. K86-164 CA8 and K86-167 CA8, was lodged with 
the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan. 
This Amendment is, among other things, a partial resolution of 
judgments previously entered against Thomas Solvent Company and Richard 
Thomas in connection with civil actions taken against them under 
Section 107(a) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
Compensation, and Liability Act (``CERCLA''), 42 U.S.C. 9607(a), in 
connection with costs incurred by the United States and the State of 
Michigan in responding to releases of hazardous substances at and about 
the Verona Well Field, located in Battle Creek, Michigan.
    Under the Amendment, Thomas Solvent would cause several payments to 
be made out of the proceeds of its settlement with an insurance 
carrier. Among those payments would be one for $2.665 million to the 
United States and another for $0.585 million to the State of Michigan, 
in partial reimbursement of government response costs for which Thomas 
Solvent is liable under the previously-entered partial consent decree 
and judgment.
    The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication comments relating to the 
proposed Amendment. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General of the Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20530, and should refer to United 
States et al. v. Thomas Solvent, et al., D.J. Ref. 90-11-2-140.
    The proposed Amendment may be examined at the Office of the United 
States Attorney, Western District of Michigan, 399 Federal Building, 
110 Michigan St., NW., Grand Rapids, Michigan, and at U.S. EPA Region 
5, Office of Regional Counsel, 200 West Adams, Chicago, Illinois, and 
at the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street NW., 4th Floor, 
Washington, DC 20005, (202) 624-0892. A copy of the proposed Consent 
Decree may be obtained in person or by mail from the Consent Decree 
Library, 1120 G Street NW., 4th Floor, Washington, DC 20005. In 
requesting a copy, please enclose a check in the amount of $6.25 (25 
cents per page reproduction cost) payable to the Consent Decree 
Library.
Joel M. Gross,
Acting Chief, Environment and Natural Resources Division, Environmental 
Enforcement Section.
[FR Doc. 95-8242 Filed 4-4-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
WebFilings | EDGAR view


      Exhibit 10.1

         COMPENSATORY ARRANGEMENTS OF CERTAIN OFFICERS

         The compensation committee of the board of directors of RadiSys Corporation approved annual base salaries and target bonuses for the following "named executive officers" (as defined by Item 402(a)(3) of Regulation S-K), effective as of April 1, 2010:

          

          

         
            	
                     Executive Officer

                  	
                      

                  	
                     New Base Salary

                  	
                      

                  	
                     Target Bonus

                  
	
                     Scott Grout - President and 

                          Chief Executive Officer

                  	
                      

                  	
                     $

                  	
                     476,736

                  	
                      

                  	
                      

                  	
                     $

                  	
                     444,920

                  	
                      

                  
	
                     Brian Bronson - Chief Financial 

                          Officer

                  	
                      

                  	
                     $

                  	
                     298,835

                  	
                      

                  	
                      

                  	
                     $

                  	
                     215,460

                  	
                      

                  
	
                     Anthony Ambrose - VP & General Manager of

                          Communications Networks

                  	
                      

                  	
                     $

                  	
                     265,000

                  	
                      

                  	
                      

                  	
                     $

                  	
                     168,000

                  	
                      

                  
	
                     Christian Lepiane - VP Worldwide 

                          Sales

                  	
                      

                  	
                     $

                  	
                     260,632

                  	
                      

                  	
                      

                  	
                     $

                  	
                     172,330

                  	
                      

                  
	
                     John Major - VP Global Operations

                  	
                      

                  	
                     $

                  	
                     260,000

                  	
                      

                  	
                      

                  	
                     $

                  	
                     170,000
EXHIBIT 23.1






                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the  registration  statement of
Entrade  Inc. on Form S-8 (File No.  333-88039  and File No.  333-91409)  of our
report  dated  March  29,  2000  on our  audits  of the  consolidated  financial
statements and financial statement schedule of Entrade.  Inc. as of December 31,
1999 and December 31, 1998, and for each of the three fiscal years in the period
ended  December 31, 1999 and our report dated March 29, 2000 on our audit of the
combined  statements  of  operations  and  changes  in  shareholders'  equity of
Nationwide  Auction Systems for the nine months ended September 30, 1999,  which
reports are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.






PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Chicago, Illinois
March 29, 2000

























                                       E-7
#### In the Matter of Sotitios Stathopoulos, Respondent, v Charles M. Smith, Jr., as Commissioner of the Department of Buildings of the City of New York, et al., Appellants.

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered on or about May 31, 1989, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Herman Cahn, J., without costs and without disbursements. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach and Smith, JJ. *[See,*141 Mise 2d 1023.]
#### Judy LANPHER, Plaintiff, and O.G. “Gary” Mace, Appellant, v. Gary D. McMULLIN, Metro North Co., et al., James L. Wilson, and Lou Collobert, Respondents.

No. WD 39980.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Sept. 27, 1988.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Nov. 1, 1988.

Application to Transfer Denied Dec. 13, 1988.

William H. Pickett, Kansas City, for appellant.

John L. Hayob & Vincent F. O’Flaherty of Niewald, Waldeck, Norris & Brown, Kansas City, for respondent McMullin.

Eric T. Swanson & Sharon K. Weedin of Knipmeyer, McCann, Fish & Smith, Kansas City, for respondent Metro North.

Robert G. Duncan, Kansas City, for respondent James Wilson.

Patrick Lysaught, Kansas City, for respondent Lou Collobert.

Before TURNAGE, P.J., and SHANGLER and MANFORD, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Direct appeal from the dismissal of a civil action for damages.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED. Rule 84.-16(b).
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Forms S-8 No. 33-66250, 33-80425, 33-89036, 333-18337) of Aseco Corporation
of our report dated May 8, 1998, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of Aseco Corporation included in the Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended March 29, 1998.
 
                                          Ernst & Young LLP
 
Boston, Massachusetts
June 24, 1998
 
                                      E-1
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 68 (Monday, April 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 18101]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8738]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-5187-3]


The Use of the Benchmark Dose Approach in Health Risk Assessment

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice of Availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of a report titled The 
Use of the Benchmark Dose Approach in Health Risk Assessment (EPA/630/
R-94/007). This report was developed to serve as a background document 
for discussing benchmark dose applications to noncancer risk 
assessment.

ADDRESSES: To obtain a single copy of the report, interested parties 
should contact the ORD Publications Office, CERI, U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency, 26 West Martin Luther King Drive, Cincinnati, OH 
45268, Tel: (513) 569-7562, Fax: (513) 569-7566. Please provide your 
name and mailing address, and request the document by the title and EPA 
number (EPA/630/R-94/007).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Clare Stine, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (8101), 401 M Street, 
SW., Washington, DC 20460, Telephone: (202) 260-6743.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For almost 10 years, scientists have been 
studying the benchmark dose (BMD) as a promising technique for the 
quantitative assessment of noncancer health effects. The information 
presented in this report is one step in developing the basis for an EPA 
consensus on the role of benchmark methods in the quantitative 
assessment of noncancer health risk. The report presents a basic 
overview of the benchmark method, which may provide an additional 
quantitative approach to current EPA practice.

    The document focuses especially on critical decisions that must be 
made in deriving a BMD and applying the BMD in risk assessment. Major 
decisions in using the BMD are explained, and the sensitivity of the 
final result to each assumption is evaluated. The document also 
identifies many unresolved issues in benchmark dose application and 
identifies research that may help resolve some of these issues.

    Dated: March 24, 1995.
Robert J. Huggett,
Assistant Administrator for Research and Development.
[FR Doc. 95-8738 Filed 4-7-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5227 

To prohibit the Department of Defense from acquiring computers or printers 

manufactured by or from entities controlled by the Government of the 

People’s Republic of China, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 18, 2023 

Mr. BACON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Department of Defense from acquiring computers or printers manufactured by or from entities controlled by the Government of the People’s Republic of 

China, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Chinese Electronics 

5 Defense Act of 2023’’. 

2 

•HR 5227 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON COMPUTERS OR PRINTERS AC2 QUISITIONS INVOLVING ENTITIES OWNED OR 

3 CONTROLLED BY CHINA. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense may not 

5 acquire any computer or printer if the manufacturer, bid6 der, or offeror is a covered Chinese entity. 

7 (b) APPLICABILITY.—This section shall apply only 

8 with respect to contracts or other agreements entered into, 

9 renewed, or extended after the date of the enactment of 

10 this Act. 

11 (c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

12 (1) COVERED CHINESE ENTITY.—The term 

13 ‘‘covered Chinese entity’’ means an entity that the 

14 Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Direc15 tor of the National Intelligence or the Director of 

16 the Federal Bureau of Investigation, determines to 

17 be an entity owned, controlled, directed, or subcon18 tracted by, affiliated with, or otherwise connected to, 

19 the Government of the People’s Republic of China. 

20 (2) MANUFACTURER.—The term ‘‘manufac21 turer’’ means— 

22 (A) the entity that transforms raw mate23 rials, miscellaneous parts, or components into 

24 the end item; 

25 (B) any entity that subcontracts with the 

26 entity described in subparagraph (A) for the enVerDate Sep 11 2014 19:23 Dec 07, 2023 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5227.IH H5227
3 

•HR 5227 IH

1 tity described in such subparagraph to trans2 form raw materials, miscellaneous parts, or 

3 components into the end item; 

4 (C) any entity that otherwise directs the 

5 entity described in subparagraph (A) to trans6 form raw materials, miscellaneous parts, or 

7 components into the end item; or 

8 (D) any parent company, subsidiary, or af9 filiate of the entity described in subparagraph 

10 (A). 

Æ
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

#### **SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS**

#### ** **

ThisCertificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of Section 1350of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal Procedures) of theUnited States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not, except to the extent required by theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

Theundersigned, who are the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer ofBehringer Harvard Opportunity REIT I, Inc. (the “Company”), each herebycertify as follows:

 

TheQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company (the “Report”), whichaccompanies this Certificate, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Dated this 14th day of August,2009.

 

 
|   | /s/ Robert S. Aisner                       |
|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|   | Robert S. Aisner, Chief  Executive Officer |
|   |                                       |
|   |                                       |
|   | /s/ Gary S. Bresky                         |
|   | Gary S. Bresky, Chief  Financial Officer   |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-12-00141-CR

Fred D. HALL,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-CR-0678

Honorable Maria Teresa Herr, Judge Presiding

Opinion by: Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 12, 2012

MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED; AFFIRMED 

Fred D. Hall was convicted by a jury of assault on a public servant and sentenced by the 

trial court to five years in prison and a $2,000.00 fine. The trial court suspended the sentence of 

confinement and placed Hall on community supervision for a period of five years. Hall appeals 

the judgment. 

Hall’s court-appointed appellate attorney filed a motion to withdraw and a brief in which 

she concludes this appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 
04-12-00141-CR

- 2 -

1978), and Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Hall was provided copies 

of the brief and motion to withdraw and was informed of his right to review the record and file 

his own brief. Hall has not filed a pro se brief. 

After reviewing the record and counsel’s brief, we find no reversible error and agree with 

counsel the appeal is wholly frivolous. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 2005). We therefore grant the motion to withdraw filed by Hall’s and affirm the trial 

court’s judgment. See id.; Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 86 (Tex. App.–San Antonio 1997, no 

pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.–San Antonio 1996, no pet.).

No substitute counsel will be appointed. Should Hall wish to seek further review of this 

case by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, he must either retain an attorney to file a petition 

for discretionary review or file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Any petition for 

discretionary review must be filed within thirty days after either this opinion is rendered or the 

last timely motion for rehearing or motion for en banc reconsideration is overruled by this court. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.2. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed with the clerk of the 

Court of Criminal Appeals. See id. R. 68.3. Any petition for discretionary review must comply 

with the requirements of rule 68.4 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See id. R. 68.4.

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

DO NOT PUBLISH