[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 104 (Wednesday, June 2, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 29491-29503]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-11352]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

18 CFR Parts 37 and 38

[Docket Nos. RM05-5-029 and RM05-5-030; Order No. 676-J]


Standards for Business Practices and Communication Protocols for 
Public Utilities

AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Department of Energy.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) is 
revising its regulations to incorporate by reference the latest version 
(Version 003.3) of the Standards for Business Practices and 
Communication Protocols for Public Utilities adopted by the Wholesale 
Electric Quadrant (WEQ) of the North American Energy Standards Board 
(NAESB). The WEQ Version 003.3 Standards include, in their entirety, 
the WEQ-023 Modeling Business Practice Standards contained in the WEQ 
Version 003.1 Standards, which address the technical issues affecting 
Available Transfer Capability (ATC) and Available Flowgate Capability 
(AFC) calculation for wholesale electric transmission services, with 
the addition of certain revisions and corrections. The Commission also 
revises its regulations to provide that transmission providers must 
avoid unduly discriminatory and preferential treatment in the 
calculation of ATC.

DATES: Effective date: This rule is effective August 2, 2021.
    Incorporation by reference: The incorporation by reference of 
certain publications listed in this rule is approved by the Director of 
the Federal Register as of August 2, 2021. The incorporation by 
reference of certain other publications listed in this rule was 
approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of April 27, 2020.
    Compliance date: Public utilities must make a compliance filing to 
comply with the requirements of this final rule through eTariff twelve 
months after implementation of the WEQ Version 003.2 Standards, but no 
earlier than October 27, 2022. Compliance filings for cybersecurity and 
Parallel Flow Visualization standards are due March 2, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Michael P. Lee (technical issues), Office of Energy Policy and 
Innovation, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, 
Washington, DC 20426, (202) 502-6548.
Peter Whitman (technical issues), Office of Energy Policy and 
Innovation, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, 
Washington, DC 20426, (202) 502-6225.
Michael A. Chase (legal issues), Office of the General Counsel, Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 
20426, (202) 502-6205.
Mark Bennett (legal issues), Office of the General Counsel, Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 
20426, (202) 502-8524.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Contents

 
                                                              Paragraph
                                                                 Nos.
 
I. Background..............................................           3.
    A. NAESB and Past Standards............................           3.
    B. Summary of NAESB WEQ Version 003.3..................           9.
II. Discussion.............................................          17.
    A. Overview............................................          17.
    B. Issues Raised by Commenters.........................          20.
        1. Changes to OASIS................................          21.
        2. Incorporation of WEQ-023 Standards 1.4 and 1.4.1          25.
        3. Changes to the Regulatory Text..................          33.
III. Waiver Requests and Implementation Issues.............          41.
    A. Waiver Requests.....................................          41.
        1. Comments........................................          41.
        2. Commission Determination........................          42.
    B. Implementation......................................          43.
        1. NOPR Proposal...................................          43.
        2. Comments........................................          44.
        3. Commission Determination........................          48.
IV. Notice of Use of Voluntary Consensus Standards.........          52.
V. Incorporation by Reference..............................          53.
VI. Information Collection Statement.......................          71.
VII. Environmental Analysis................................          75.
VIII. Regulatory Flexibility Act...........................          76.
IX. Document Availability..................................          79.
X. Effective Date and Congressional Notification...........          82.
 

    1. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) is 
amending its regulations under the Federal Power Act (FPA) \1\ to 
incorporate by reference into its regulations as mandatory enforceable 
requirements, the latest version (Version 003.3) of the Standards for 
Business Practices and Communication Protocols for Public Utilities 
adopted by the Wholesale Electric Quadrant (WEQ) of the North

[[Page 29492]]

American Energy Standards Board (NAESB), filed with the Commission on 
March 30, 2020 (March 30 Filing). The WEQ Version 003.3 Standards build 
upon an earlier version of the standards that the Commission previously 
included and incorporated by reference into its regulations at 18 CFR 
parts 2 and 38, respectively, in Order No. 676-I.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 16 U.S.C. 791a, et seq. (2018).
    \2\ Standards for Bus. Practices & Commc'n Protocols for Pub. 
Utils., Order No. 676-I, 85 FR 10,571 (Feb. 25, 2020), 170 FERC ] 
61,062 (2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    2. The WEQ Version 003.3 Standards include newly created standards 
as well as modifications to existing standards developed through the 
NAESB Business Practice Standards development or minor correction 
processes. The WEQ Version 003.3 Standards include revisions related to 
the surety assessment on cybersecurity performed by Sandia National 
Laboratories (Sandia) designed to strengthen the practices and 
cybersecurity protections established within the standards. NAESB also 
revised its Open Access Same-Time Information System (OASIS) suite of 
standards,\3\ including revisions to support new OASIS functionality 
that will allow for the posting of third party offers of planning 
redispatch services as well as providing additional information 
regarding the curtailment of firm transmission service. In addition, 
the WEQ Version 003.3 Standards include revisions to the NAESB WEQ-023 
Modeling Business Practice Standards. The Commission also revises 18 
CFR 37.6(b)(2)(i) to codify that the calculation of Available Transfer 
Capability (ATC) must be conducted in manner that is transparent, 
consistent with system conditions and outages for the relevant 
timeframe, and not unduly discriminatory or preferential.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The OASIS suite of standards are the WEQ-001 OASIS Business 
Practice Standards, the WEQ-002 OASIS Standards and Communication 
Protocols Business Practice Standards, the WEQ-003 OASIS Data 
Dictionary Business Practice Standards, and the WEQ-013 OASIS 
Implementation Guide Business Practice Standards.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Background

A. NAESB and Past Standards

    3. NAESB is a non-profit standards development organization 
established in late 2001 (as the successor to the Gas Industry 
Standards Board (GISB), which was established in 1994) and serves as an 
industry forum for the development of business practice standards and 
communication protocols for the wholesale and retail natural gas and 
electricity industry sectors. Since 1995, NAESB's predecessor GISB and 
subsequently NAESB itself have been accredited members of the American 
National Standards Institute (ANSI), complying with ANSI's requirements 
that its standards reflect a consensus of the affected industries.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Prior to the establishment of NAESB in 2001, the 
Commission's development of business practice standards for the 
wholesale electric industry was aided by two ad hoc industry working 
groups established during the rulemaking proceeding that resulted in 
issuance of Order No. 889 and the creation of the OASIS, while 
GISB's efforts involved the development of business practice 
standards for the wholesale natural gas industry. Once formally 
established, NAESB took over the standards development previously 
handled by GISB and by the electric working groups.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    4. NAESB's standards include business practices intended to 
standardize and streamline the transactional processes of the natural 
gas and electric industries, as well as communication protocols and 
related standards designed to improve the efficiency of communication 
within each industry. NAESB supports all three ``quadrants'' of the gas 
and electric industries: wholesale gas, wholesale electric, and retail 
markets.\5\ All participants in the gas and electric industries are 
eligible to join NAESB and participate in standards development.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The retail gas quadrant and the retail electric quadrant 
were combined into the retail markets quadrant. NAESB continues to 
refer to these working groups as ``quadrants'' even though there are 
now only three quadrants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    5. NAESB develops its standards under a consensus process so that 
the standards draw support from a wide range of industry members. 
NAESB's procedures are designed to ensure that all persons choosing to 
participate can have input into the development of a standard, 
regardless of whether they are members of NAESB, and each standard 
NAESB adopts must be supported by a consensus of the relevant industry 
segments. Standards that fail to gain consensus support are not 
adopted. NAESB's consistent practice has been to submit a report to the 
Commission after it has revised existing business practice standards or 
has developed and adopted new business practice standards. NAESB's 
standards are initially voluntary standards, which become mandatory for 
public utilities upon incorporation by reference by the Commission.
    6. NAESB filed its WEQ Version 003.2 Business Practices Standards 
(WEQ Version 003.2 Standards) on December 8, 2017 (December 8 Filing), 
in Docket No. RM05-5-027.\6\ After consideration of the December 8 
Filing, the Commission issued the WEQ Version 003.2 NOPR on May 16, 
2019, wherein the Commission proposed to revise its regulations to 
incorporate by reference the WEQ Version 003.2 Standards, with certain 
enumerated exceptions.\7\ The Commission announced that NAESB's WEQ-023 
Modeling Business Practice Standards would be addressed separately, 
proposing only to incorporate by reference the WEQ-023 Modeling 
Business Practice Standards that were moved from the WEQ-001 OASIS 
Business Practice Standards by the changes made to the WEQ Version 
003.1 Standards.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Docket No. RM05-5-027, Report of the North American 
Energy Standards Board on Wholesale Electric Quadrant Business 
Practice Standards Version 003.2 under RM05-5 (Dec. 8, 2017) (NAESB 
WEQ Version 003.2 Report).
    \7\ See Standards for Bus. Practices & Commc'n Protocols for 
Pub. Utils., Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 84 FR 24050 (May 16, 
2019), 167 FERC ] 61,127 (2019) (WEQ Version 003.2 NOPR).
    \8\ WEQ Version 003.2 NOPR, 167 FERC ] 61,127 at P 12. See also 
Standards for Bus. Practices & Commc'n Protocols for Pub. Utils., 
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 81 FR 49580 (Jul. 28, 2016), 156 FERC 
] 61,055, at P 42 (2016) (WEQ Version 003.1 NOPR).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    7. On February 4, 2020, the Commission issued Order No. 676-I, in 
which it amended its regulations under the FPA to incorporate by 
reference into its regulations as mandatory enforceable requirements, 
with certain enumerated exceptions, the WEQ Version 003.2 Standards. 
The WEQ Version 003.2 Standards included the changes proposed in WEQ 
Version 003.1 Standards, which were the subject of an earlier notice of 
proposed rulemaking.\9\ All of these standards, except for the WEQ-022 
and WEQ-023 Business Practice Standards, update and replace standards 
that the Commission previously incorporated by reference in Order No. 
676-H.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ NAESB filed the WEQ Version 003.1 Standards on October 26, 
2015 (October 2015 Filing). See, e.g., WEQ Version 003.1 NOPR, 156 
FERC ] 61,055.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    8. Among the NAESB Business Practice Standards incorporated by 
reference in Order No. 676-I, the Commission incorporated the WEQ-022 
Electric Industry Registry (EIR) Business Practice Standards, but did 
not incorporate by reference in its entirety the WEQ-023 Modeling 
Business Practice Standards. The Commission only incorporated by 
reference the WEQ-023 Modeling Business Practice Standards that were 
moved from the WEQ-001 OASIS Business Practice Standards by the changes 
made to the WEQ Version 003.1 Standards.\10\ The Commission also did 
not adopt the NOPR proposal to incorporate by

[[Page 29493]]

reference NAESB's latest version of the WEQ-006 Manual Time Error 
Correction Business Practice Standards.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ The following WEQ-023 Modeling Business Practice Standards 
were incorporated by reference in Order No. 676-I: WEQ-023-5; WEQ-
023-5.1; WEQ-023-5.1.1; WEQ-023-5.1.2; WEQ-023-5.1.2.1; WEQ-023-
5.1.2.2; WEQ-023-5.1.2.3; WEQ-023-5.1.3; WEQ-023-5.2; WEQ-023-6; 
WEQ-023-6.1; WEQ-023-6.1.1; WEQ-023-6.1.2; and WEQ-023-A Appendix A.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Summary of NAESB WEQ Version 003.3

    9. On March 30, 2020, NAESB filed the WEQ Version 003.3 
Standards.\11\ The WEQ Version 003.3 Standards build upon the standards 
included in the WEQ Version 003.2 Standards. After consideration of the 
March 30 Filing, the Commission issued the WEQ Version 003.3 NOPR on 
July 16, 2020, wherein the Commission proposed to incorporate the WEQ 
Version 003.3 Standards, with certain enumerated exceptions.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See NAESB WEQ Version 003.3 Report (filed March 30, 2020).
    \12\ Standards for Bus. Practices & Commc'n Protocols for Pub. 
Utils., 85 FR 55201 (Sept. 4, 2020) 172 FERC ] 61,047 (2020) (WEQ 
Version 003.3 NOPR).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    10. NAESB's WEQ Version 003.3 Standards include newly created 
standards as well as modifications to existing standards developed 
through the NAESB Business Practice Standards development or minor 
correction processes.\13\ The WEQ Version 003.3 Standards also include 
additions and revisions to the NAESB WEQ-023 Modeling Business Practice 
Standards, which the Commission addresses herein.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See NAESB WEQ Version 003.3 Report, Transmittal at 1-2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    11. The WEQ Version 003.3 Standards include revisions related to 
the surety assessment on cybersecurity performed by Sandia. NAESB 
responded to a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) request that NAESB act 
on an expedited basis to ensure the WEQ cybersecurity standards 
developed in response to the surety assessment were included in the WEQ 
Version 003.3 Standards.\14\ NAESB reports that the changes strengthen 
the practices and cybersecurity protections established within the 
standards by aligning security requirements with other cybersecurity 
guidelines, mitigating potential vulnerabilities, and incorporating 
more secure communication and encryption methodologies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ Id. at 3-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    12. In support of directives contained in Order No. 890,\15\ NAESB 
also revised the OASIS suite of standards. The WEQ Version 003.3 
Standards include additions and revisions to support new OASIS 
functionality that will allow for the posting of third party offers of 
planning redispatch services (WEQ-001-13.2) as well as providing 
additional information regarding the curtailment of firm transmission 
service (WEQ-001-28) prescribed in the OASIS suite of standards.\16\ In 
response to Order No. 676-I, NAESB also revised the standards as 
necessary to conform with the Commission's Dynegy policy, and stated 
that any standards from these efforts will be incorporated into future 
versions of the WEQ Business Practice Standards.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ Preventing Undue Discrimination & Preference in 
Transmission Serv., Order No. 890, 72 FR 12266 (Mar. 15, 2007), 118 
FERC ] 61,119, order on reh'g, Order No. 890-A, 73 FR 2984 (Jan. 16, 
2008), 121 FERC ] 61,297 (2007), order on reh'g, Order No. 890-B, 
123 FERC ] 61,299 (2008), order on reh'g, Order No. 890-C, 74 FERC 
12540 (Mar. 25 2009), 126 FERC ] 61,228, order on clarification, 
Order No. 890-D, 74 FR 61511 (Nov. 25, 2009), 129 FERC ] 61,126 
(2009).
    \16\ NAESB WEQ Version 003.3 Report, Transmittal at 4. WEQ-001-
13.2 adds new Third Party Offers for Planning Redispatch Services 
Business Practice Standards to allow for posting of third-party 
offers of planning redispatch services. WEQ-001-28 adds new 
Curtailment Posting Requirements Business Practice Standards for the 
posting of additional information on OASIS regarding firm 
transmission curtailments.
    \17\ In Dynegy Power Marketing, Inc, 99 FERC ] 61,054 (2002) 
(Dynegy), the Commission established its policy on a customer's 
right to keep its contractual rights to point-to-point firm 
transmission service on the original path it has reserved while the 
customer's request for a redirect is pending.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    13. The WEQ Version 003.3 Standards also include changes that were 
made to support consistency with the North American Electric 
Reliability Corporation (NERC) Reliability Standards, including NERC's 
retirement of the NERC Interchange Scheduling and Coordination 
Reliability Standards and retirement of the NERC Modeling, Data, and 
Analysis Reliability Standards. NAESB coordinated with NERC to make 
modifications and revisions pertaining to electronic tagging (e-
Tagging),\18\ and to the calculation of ATC and AFC.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ With respect to e-Tagging, NAESB also modified the WEQ-004 
Coordinate Interchange Business Practice Standards' Commercial 
Timing Tables to clarify commercial timing requirements.
    \19\ NAESB WEQ Version 003.3 Report, Transmittal at 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    14. The WEQ Version 003.3 Standards also include additions, 
revisions, and reservations made to the WEQ-008 Transmission Load 
Relief (TLR)--Eastern Interconnection Business Practice Standards, 
which NAESB advises completes the standards development effort for the 
Parallel Flow Visualization (PFV) enhanced congestion management 
process (PFV Standards).\20\ The PFV Standards are the culmination of a 
multi-year coordination effort between NAESB, NERC, and the Eastern 
Interconnect Data Sharing Network (EIDSN), Inc.,\21\ and the standards 
are designed to improve upon the congestion management procedures for 
the Eastern Interconnection through the use of real-time data in 
calculations for transmission loading relief obligations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ Id.
    \21\ Comprised of North American Reliability Coordinators, 
Transmission Operators, Transmission Owners, and Balancing 
Authorities, EIDSN, Inc. manages the Electric Information Network 
(EInet), a data-sharing network for its members to promote the 
reliable and efficient operation of the Eastern and Quebec 
Interconnections. See EIDSN, Inc., Our Mission, at https://eidsn.org/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    15. Moreover, as part of the standards development process, NAESB 
made five additional revisions to the OASIS suite of standards that 
were not made in response to Commission orders.\22\ First, NAESB 
modified the OASIS suite of standards to improve OASIS query 
functionalities. Second, NAESB modified the OASIS suite of standards 
for new OASIS functionality to fully document all encumbrances to 
unconditional firm transmission service, such as untagged pseudo-ties. 
Third, NAESB modified the OASIS suite of standards to expand notice 
functionality and establish standards for providing dynamic 
notification to transmission customers of the renewal deadline for 
rollover rights for point-to-point transmission service. Fourth, NAESB 
modified WEQ-001 OASIS Business Practice Standards for use of Next Hour 
Market Service and the 0-NX transmission product codes. Fifth, NAESB 
modified the OASIS suite of standards to modify Network Integration 
Transmission Service (NITS) requirements. Finally, NAESB revised the 
OASIS suite of standards to make three minor corrections.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ NAESB WEQ Version 003.3 Report, Transmittal at 5.
    \23\ Minor corrections were made to the WEQ-001 OASIS Business 
Practice Standards and the WEQ-003 OASIS Data Dictionary Business 
Practice Standards.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    16. The WEQ Version 003.3 Standards include the WEQ-023 Modeling 
Business Practice Standards that provide technical details concerning 
the calculation of ATC for wholesale electric transmission services. 
The WEQ-023 Modeling Business Practice Standards address aspects of 
certain of the NERC MOD A Reliability Standards relating to modeling, 
data and analysis that are included in the NERC's proposed retirement 
of its MOD A Reliability Standards.

II. Discussion

A. Overview

    17. NAESB's WEQ Version 003.3 Standards, which we are incorporating 
by reference in this final rule, include modifications, reservations, 
and/or

[[Page 29494]]

additions to the following set of existing standards: \24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ See NAESB WEQ Version 003.3 Report, Transmittal at 3.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               WEQ                      Business practice standards
------------------------------------------------------------------------
000..............................  Abbreviations, Acronyms, and
                                    Definition of Terms.
001..............................  Open Access Same-Time Information
                                    System (OASIS).
002..............................  OASIS Standards and Communication
                                    Protocols (S&CP).
003..............................  OASIS S&CP Data Dictionaries.
004..............................  Coordinate Interchange.
008..............................  Transmission Loading Relief (TLR)--
                                    Eastern Interconnection Business
                                    Practice Standards.
013..............................  OASIS Implementation Guide.
023..............................  Modeling.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    18. The specific NAESB standards that we are incorporating by 
reference in this final rule establish a set of business practice 
standards and communication protocols for the electric industry that 
will continue to enable industry members to achieve efficiencies by 
streamlining utility business and transactional processes and 
communication procedures. All of these standards, except for portions 
of the WEQ-023 Modeling Business Practice Standards, update and replace 
standards that the Commission previously incorporated by reference in 
Order No. 676-I.
    19. As the Commission has explained in prior orders, NAESB approved 
the standards under its consensus procedures.\25\ Adoption of consensus 
standards is appropriate because the consensus process helps ensure the 
reasonableness of the standards by requiring that the standards draw 
support from a broad spectrum of all segments of the industry. 
Moreover, since the industry itself must conduct business under these 
standards, the Commission's regulations should reflect those standards 
that have the widest possible support. In section 12(d) of the National 
Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995, Congress affirmatively 
requires federal agencies to use technical standards developed by 
voluntary consensus standards organizations, like NAESB, to carry out 
policy objectives or activities.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ Standards for Business Practices and Communication 
Protocols for Public Utilities, Order No. 676-H, 79 FR 56939 (Sept. 
24, 2015), 148 FERC ] 61,205, at P 21, n.27 (2014). (``WEQ's 
procedures ensure that all industry members can have input into the 
development of a business practice standard, whether or not they are 
members of NAESB, and each standard it adopts is supported by a 
consensus of the seven industry segments: Transmission, generation, 
marketer/brokers, distribution/load serving entities, end users, 
independent grid operators/planners, and technology services. Under 
the WEQ process, for a standard to be approved, it must receive a 
super-majority vote of 67 percent of the members of the WEQ's 
Executive Committee with support from at least 40 percent of each of 
the seven industry segments. For final approval, 67 percent of the 
WEQ's general membership must ratify the standards.'').
    \26\ Public Law 104-113, 12(d), 110 Stat. 775 (1996), 15 U.S.C. 
272 note (1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Issues Raised by Commenters

    20. Comments in response to the WEQ Version 003.3 NOPR were filed 
by four commenters. Commenters expressed general support for the 
Commission's proposals,\27\ and no comments opposed the basic direction 
of the NOPR, although some commenters took issue with specific details 
of the NOPR proposal. Specifically, commenters raised discrete concerns 
regarding the WEQ-023 Business Practice Standards and the Commission's 
proposed regulatory text regarding non-discriminatory ATC calculations. 
Commenters also commented on whether the Commission should require 
industry to implement WEQ Version 003.2 prior to WEQ Version 003.3, or 
instead should cancel the implementation obligation of WEQ Version 
003.2 and require implementation of all accepted WEQ Version 003.3 
Business Practice Standards (including WEQ 003.2 changes) within 18 
months. We will incorporate by reference into the Commission's 
regulations all of the WEQ Version 003.3 Standards and amend the 
regulatory text at Sec.  37.6(b)(2)(i) as described below. We will 
separately discuss each of the issues raised by commenters.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ The ISO/RTO Council specifically endorsed the WEQ Version 
003.3 NOPR proposal to incorporate by reference business practice 
standards necessary to effectuate the PFV enhanced congestion 
management process. ISO/RTO Council Comments at 2, 4-5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. Changes to OASIS
a. Background
    21. Order No. 890 requires transmission providers to post to OASIS 
``all circumstances and events contributing to the need for a firm 
service curtailment, specific services and customers curtailed 
(including the transmission provider's own retail loads), and the 
duration of the curtailment.'' \28\ As the Commission explained in the 
NOPR, NAESB made additional modifications to the OASIS suite of 
standards, as well as consistency changes to WEQ-000 Abbreviations, 
Acronyms, and Definition of Terms Business Practice Standards. NAESB's 
changes to the standards included modifications to existing templates 
and the creation of two new templates to provide the mechanism for 
transmission providers to post the required additional information 
regarding the curtailment of firm transmission service, including the 
curtailment of non-firm transmission service that preceded any firm 
transmission curtailments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ Order No. 890, 118 FERC ] 61,119 at P 1627.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    22. The information needed to meet the posting requirements is 
contained in two separate tools: The Interchange Distribution 
Calculator (IDC) tool for the Eastern Interconnection, managed by 
EIDSN, Inc., and the Enhanced Curtailment Calculator (ECC) tool for the 
Western Interconnection, managed by the California Independent System 
Operator. Although both the IDC and ECC tools produce information to be 
posted to OASIS in accordance with the standards, NAESB states that its 
members determined that the need for a mechanism to transfer data from 
the tools to OASIS should be addressed as part of any industry 
implementation rather than through standards modifications.
b. Comments
    23. The ISO/RTO Council states that it supports an automated 
mechanism to transfer data from the IDC/ECC tools to the firm 
transmission curtailment templates.\29\ The ISO/RTO Council states that 
it currently is unclear whether firm curtailment information must be 
posted manually prior to the implementation of an automated data 
transfer mechanism.\30\ The ISO/RTO Council contends that manually 
populating firm curtailment data into the templates is administratively 
burdensome and introduces the potential for human (data entry) error, 
and automated data transfer results in a more reliable, accurate and 
equitable posting process.\31\ The ISO/RTO Council requests that the 
Commission clarify that manual postings will not be required as an 
interim means to achieve compliance while the automated data transfer 
mechanism is being developed per the implementation schedule for the 
WEQ Version 003.3 Standards.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \29\ ISO/RTO Council Comments at 13.
    \30\ Id.
    \31\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

c. Commission Determination
    24. Because of the importance of posting information regarding firm 
curtailments, we will not delay implementation while industry develops 
a more automated data transfer mechanism. NAESB states that its

[[Page 29495]]

members determined that the need for a mechanism to transfer data from 
the tools to OASIS should be addressed as part of any industry 
implementation rather than as part of the standards modifications. 
While we encourage the industry to develop automated tools as quickly 
as possible, we agree that this effort should be independent from the 
development and implementation of the standards.

2. Incorporation of WEQ-023 Standards 1.4 and 1.4.1

a. Background
    25. The WEQ-023 Business Practice Standards include two new 
standards related to contract path management not previously included 
in the NERC MOD A Reliability Standards. These two Business Practice 
Standards, WEQ-023-1.4 and WEQ-023-1.4.1, limit the amount of firm 
transmission service granted on an ATC Path and limit the interchange 
schedule (both firm and non-firm) between balancing authority areas to 
the contract path limit for that given path, respectively.\32\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \32\ WEQ-023 1.4 states, ``[e]ach Transmission Service Provider 
shall not grant a request for Firm Transmission Service on an ATC 
Path that serves as an interface with another BAA if the net of the 
Firm Transmission Service transactions into and out of the 
Transmission Service Provider's BAA would exceed the sum of the 
Facility Ratings of Tie Facilities, to which Transmission Service 
Providers mutually agree they have the right to use Tie Facilities 
that comprise the ATC Path, between the two BAAs.''
    WEQ-023 1.4.1 states, ``[e]ach Transmission Service Provider 
shall limit the Interchange Schedule (both Firm and non-Firm) of the 
reservations on an ATC path into and out of Transmission Service 
Provider's BAA on an interface with another BAA such that the Net 
Interchange Schedule does not exceed the sum of the Facility Ratings 
of Tie Facilities, to which Transmission Service Providers mutually 
agree they have the right to use the Tie Facilities that comprise 
the ATC Path, between the two BAAs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

b. Comments
    26. Bonneville Power Administration (Bonneville) and the ISO/RTO 
Council ask the Commission to decline to incorporate by reference these 
Standards. Bonneville asserts that the WEQ-023-1.4 and WEQ-023-1.4.1 
Business Practice Standards need further refinement by the industry 
before they are ready for incorporation by reference, if at all. 
Bonneville states that these Standards appear to be inconsistent with 
how Bonneville and other transmission service providers and system 
operators in the Western Interconnection operate their systems. 
Bonneville explains that, for itself and others, an ATC Path is allowed 
to be overscheduled up to twenty minutes prior to flow, at which point 
interruptions of non-firm service, curtailments, or economic 
dispatches, are then performed to ensure that path limits are not 
exceeded. Bonneville further states that this practice allows it to 
maximize transmission utilization including the integration of variable 
resources scheduled within the hour, and that these requirements, if 
incorporated by reference as drafted, would restrict energy supply and 
transmission availability.\33\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \33\ Bonneville Comments at 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    27. Bonneville contends that its concerns with Business Practice 
Standards WEQ-023-1.4 and 1.4.1 are particularly relevant in light of 
the recent heat wave events of August and September 2020 in California. 
Bonneville asserts that eliminating the practice of over-scheduling 
until the final twenty minutes prior to flow on transmission facilities 
such as the California-Oregon Intertie could artificially restrict 
energy supply and transmission availability.\34\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \34\ Id. at 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    28. The ISO/RTO Council joins Bonneville in opposing WEQ-023-1.4 
and 1.4.1 Business Practice Standards, stating that requiring 
transmission service providers to assume all firm transmission service 
reservations will be used in full, without accounting for the 
transmission customer's scheduling activity, ``will undoubtedly result 
in less efficient use of the transmission system.'' The ISO/RTO Council 
also expresses concern that under system conditions which include the 
sudden, unexpected outage or de-rate of a transmission facility 
associated with an ATC path, there may not be sufficient time to adjust 
posted ATC or modify the current interchange, which could lead to a 
violation of the requirement.\35\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \35\ ISO/RTO Council Comments at 9.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    29. The ISO/RTO Council notes that WEQ-023-1.4 and 1.4.1 Business 
Practice Standards were initially rejected by the NAESB Business 
Practices Subcommittee, and that the ISO/RTO Council and other 
entities, including PJM Interconnection LLC, Midcontinent Independent 
System Operator, Inc., Southwest Power Pool, Electric Reliability 
Council Of Texas, Inc., and the Independent Electricity System Operator 
of Ontario, raised concerns that remain unresolved.\36\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \36\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

c. Commission Determination
    30. We incorporate by reference all of the WEQ-023 Modeling 
Business Practice Standards. The WEQ-023 Business Practice Standards 
were filed in October 2015 and were the product of an extensive 
development process by a NAESB subcommittee with the necessary 
expertise to address the relevant technical issues. Although WEQ-023-
1.4 and 1.4.1 Business Practice Standards were not in NERC's MOD A 
Reliability Standards, they were proposed to help address differences 
in how contract paths are treated that would have existed among the 
three methods for calculating ATC: Rated System Path Methodology, Area 
Interchange Methodology, and Flowgate Methodology. Declining to adopt 
these standards at this point could potentially loosen the requirements 
for non-discriminatory calculation of ATC and may require changes to 
specific standards regarding particular contract paths. Given the 
deliberately broad nature of these standards, the record does not show 
that current business practices, such as a response to a sudden de-rate 
or outage referenced by the ISO/RTO Council, would necessarily be 
considered a violation of the standards.
    31. Moreover, a consensus of the industry approved these standards 
with Bonneville, MISO and ISO-NE voting in favor at the WEQ 
stakeholders meeting, while no ISO/RTO and only one utility voted in 
opposition. In reviewing these standards, the Commission relies heavily 
on the consensus expertise of the NAESB membership.\37\ Concerns with 
the NAESB Business Practice Standards therefore should be raised within 
the NAESB process, and the industry should seek to resolve any issues 
therein and, if they cannot, the parties need to provide a factual 
record for the Commission to consider the issue.\38\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \37\ Standards for Business Practices of Interstate Natural Gas 
Pipelines; Order No. 587, 61 FR 39,053, 39057 (July 26, 1996), FERC 
Stats. & Regs. ] 31,038, at 30.059 (1996) (cross-referenced at 76 
FERC ] 61042) (``Since it is the industry that must operate under 
these standards, deferring to the considered judgment of the 
consensus of the industry is both reasonable and appropriate.'').
    \38\ See Standards for Bus. Practices of Interstate Nat. Gas 
Pipelines, Order No. 587-G, 63 FR 20072, 20076-80 (Apr. 23, 1998), 
FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,062, at 30,668-74 (1998) (cross-referenced 
at 83 FERC ] 61,029) (Commission resolved issue on which NAESB's 
predecessor, the Gas Industry Standards Board, could not reach 
consensus).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    32. Bonneville and the ISO/RTO Council have raised concerns with 
whether implementation of these standards in all cases will result in a 
loss of scheduling flexibility without the risk of overscheduling. We 
therefore remind these parties that, as further discussed in P 41, we 
remain open to examining requests for waivers of these standards when 
utilities make compliance filings.\39\ Such requests

[[Page 29496]]

should explain why the filing parties believe their current practices 
violate the standards and why their practices should be considered 
equal or superior to the standards in preventing overscheduling while 
providing for more flexibility or other benefits in scheduling. We urge 
NAESB to consider the issues raised by Bonneville and the ISO/RTO 
Council and whether revisions to these standards are warranted. The 
Commission also is mindful of the consideration of the potential 
benefits of maximizing the use of transmission when appropriate, 
without compromising reliability, and maintaining flexibility to 
maximize transmission utilization as conditions change, and has 
scheduled a workshop that may consider these issues.\40\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \39\ Order No. 676-H, 148 FERC ] 61,205 at P 80.
    \40\ Electric Transmission Incentives Policy Under Section 219 
of the Federal Power Act, Notice of Workshop, RM20-10-000 & AD19-19-
000 (Apr. 15, 2021). The workshop is scheduled for September 10, 
2021.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

3. Changes to the Regulatory Text
a. Background
    33. The Commission sought comment on proposed additional regulatory 
text in 18 CFR 37.6 (information to be posted on the OASIS) stating 
that transmission provider ATC calculations must be transparent, 
consistent, and not unduly discriminatory or preferential. 
Specifically, the Commission proposed to make the revisions indicated 
below to the regulatory text in 18 CFR 37.6(b)(2)(i):
    Information used to calculate any posting of ATC and TTC must be 
dated and time-stamped and all calculations shall be performed 
according to consistently applied methodologies referenced in the 
Transmission Provider's transmission tariff and shall be based on 
Commission-approved [Reliability Standards,] business practice and 
electronic communication standards, and related implementation 
documents, as well as current industry practices, standards and 
criteria. Transmission Providers shall calculate ATC and TTC in 
coordination with and consistent with capability and usage on 
neighboring systems, calculate system capability using factors derived 
from operations and planning data for the time frame for which data are 
being posted (including anticipated outages), and update ATC and TTC 
calculations as inputs change. Such calculations shall be conducted in 
a manner that is transparent, consistent, and not unduly discriminatory 
or preferential.\41\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \41\ Additions to the regulatory text are indicated by italics. 
Deletions from the regulatory text are indicated by [brackets.]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    34. The NOPR explained that ``this proposed regulation, in 
conjunction with the WEQ-023 Modeling Business Practice Standards, will 
help ensure that all transmission customers will be treated fairly when 
seeking alternative power supplies, and will provide for comparable and 
not unduly discriminatory or preferential treatment of native load 
customers and transmission service customers.'' \42\ The Commission 
also sought comment on whether it should develop new regulations 
outside of the NAESB standards development process ``to maintain the 
current level of detail related to ATC calculations; if so, what level 
of detail those regulations should have.'' \43\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \42\ WEQ Version 003.3 NOPR, 172 FERC ] 61,047 at P 49 (citing 
Mandatory Reliability Standards for the Calculation of Available 
Transfer Capability, Capacity Benefit Margins, Transmission 
Reliability Margins, Total Transfer Capability, & Existing 
Transmission Commitments & Mandatory Reliability Standards for the 
Bulk-Power Sys., Order No. 729, 74 FR 64884 (Dec. 8, 2009), 129 FERC 
] 61,155, at P 2 (2009)).
    \43\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

b. Comments
    35. Four commenters oppose the Commission's proposed changes to the 
regulatory text. No commenters filed in support of the proposal. 
Bonneville and the Edison Electric Institute (EEI) assert that the 
Commission's proposed language is unnecessary. Bonneville further 
asserts that the regulatory changes circumvent the NAESB process 
sanctioned by the Commission for the development of standards, and that 
the Commission's regulations are not the appropriate place to address 
technical details involving the calculation of ATC and TTC. In 
particular, Bonneville maintains that the Commission's proposed 
language includes ambiguous references to technical concepts such as 
``factors derived from operations and planning data'' in the 
calculation of ATC and TTC.\44\ EEI contends that revisions should 
occur through NAESB's standard development process, and that the 
directives in Order No. 890 and related provisions in the pro forma 
OATT are sufficient to ensure that ATC calculation is consistent and 
non-discriminatory. EEI also notes that in Order No. 890, the 
Commission acknowledged its reliance on NAESB for the development of 
business practice standards.\45\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \44\ Bonneville Comments at 3.
    \45\ EEI Comments at 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    36. The ISO/RTO Council disagrees with the concerns expressed in 
the NOPR about the opportunity for discriminatory practices and 
transmission provider discretion in the calculation of ATC and AFC, 
stating that the WEQ-023 Modeling Business Practice Standards ``were 
extensively vetted through NAESB's industry-wide standards development 
process where any comments received regarding the lesser degree of 
detail in the standards were successfully addressed prior to NAESB 
ratification.'' \46\ The ISO/RTO Council contends that the WEQ-023 
Modeling Business Practice Standards ensure non-discriminatory 
practices and limit transmission provider discretion by requiring each 
transmission service provider to publish its ATC calculation 
methodology, and to describe its methodology in its ATC implementation 
document such that, given the same information used by the transmission 
service provider, the ATC calculations are reproducible and can be 
validated.\47\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \46\ ISO/RTO Council Comments at 7.
    \47\ Id. at 7-8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    37. Similarly, Open Access Technology International, Inc. (OATI) 
maintains that the NAESB standards development process is the best way 
to draft standards through an open, transparent, and industry 
participant driven process. It states that standards developed through 
this process would help the Commission avoid the imposition of 
unintentional and unnecessary regulatory changes.\48\ All four 
commenters agree that, if the Commission determines that the WEQ-023 
Modeling Business Practice Standards are insufficient, it should 
encourage NAESB to provide additional details and specific standards to 
address those shortcomings.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \48\ OATI Comments at 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

c. Commission Determination
    38. We adopt the NOPR proposal, with certain revisions. We 
recognize that commenters oppose adding these criteria to the 
Commission's regulations, but after consideration of their arguments we 
continue to believe that revisions to the Commission's regulations are 
necessary to ensure that transmission provider ATC calculations are 
transparent, consistent with anticipated system conditions and outages 
for the relevant timeframe, and not unduly discriminatory or 
preferential. However, in response to concerns raised in comments, we 
will not include detailed technical criteria in the regulations, but we 
will instead include the fundamentals of Order No. 890 requirements for 
calculating ATC, which is consistent with what the Commission proposed 
in the NOPR. The

[[Page 29497]]

regulatory text will read as shown below.\49\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \49\ Additions to the current regulatory text at 18 CFR 
37.6(b)(2)(i) are indicated by italics. Deletions to the regulatory 
text are indicated by [brackets.]

    Information used to calculate any posting of ATC and TTC must be 
dated and time-stamped and all calculations shall be performed 
according to consistently applied methodologies referenced in the 
Transmission Provider's transmission tariff and shall be based on 
Commission-approved [Reliability Standards,] business practice and 
electronic communication standards, and related implementation 
documents, as well as current industry practices, standards and 
criteria. Such calculations shall be conducted in a manner that is 
transparent, consistent with anticipated system conditions and 
outages for the relevant timeframe, and not unduly discriminatory or 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
preferential.

    39. The revised regulatory text properly references the WEQ 
Business Practice Standards in place of the NERC Mod A Reliability 
Standards that have been proposed for retirement. It also includes in 
the regulation Order No. 890's fundamental requirement that 
transmission provider ATC calculations must be transparent, consistent 
with anticipated system conditions and outages for the relevant 
timeframe, and not unduly discriminatory or preferential, but without 
introducing specific technical concepts that may be subject to 
differing interpretations.\50\ We adopt this regulatory text because it 
has the advantage of removing the most objectionable language opposed 
by commenters while including the fundamental requirements in Order No. 
890, including that the determination of ATC must not be unduly 
discriminatory or preferential.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \50\ See, e.g., Order No. 890, 118 FERC ] 61,119 at P 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    40. Commenters do not indicate a need at this time for additional 
ATC standards or for the Commission to develop further regulations 
outside of the NAESB standards development process. The industry, 
through the NAESB process, should continue to consider further 
refinements to these standards to improve the accuracy of these 
calculations.

III. Waiver Requests and Implementation Issues

A. Waiver Requests

1. Comments
    41. The ISO/RTO Council asks the Commission to continue to 
acknowledge in its final rule that, consistent with Commission 
precedent and currently-effective policy, each public utility may seek 
as part of its compliance filing waiver of new or revised standards in 
the WEQ Version 003.3 Standards, and renewal of existing waivers 
previously granted by the Commission. The ISO/RTO Council requests a 
similar clarification be included in the final rule for this 
proceeding.\51\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \51\ ISO/RTO Council Comments at 13-14.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Commission Determination
    42. Public utilities may seek waiver of the standards for newly 
developed or newly revised standards and for the renewal of existing 
waivers. Our policy on when these waivers will be granted or denied is 
not being changed in this final rule. The Commission has previously 
stated that if a public utility asserts that its circumstances warrant 
a continued waiver of the regulations, the public utility may file a 
request for a waiver wherein the public utility can detail the 
circumstances that it believes warrant a waiver.\52\ In its request for 
continued waiver, the public utility must include the date, docket 
number, and explanation for why the waiver was initially granted by the 
Commission. The Commission will decide on any such waiver request on a 
case-by-case basis, and absent a Commission-approved waiver, compliance 
with the standards is required by all public utilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \52\ See Standards for Business Practices and Communication 
Protocols for Public Utilities, Order No. 676-E, 74 FERC 63288 (Dec. 
3, 2009), 129 FERC ] 61,162, at P 107 (2009).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Implementation

1. NOPR Proposal
    43. In the WEQ Version 003.3 NOPR, the Commission proposed to 
implement the WEQ Version 003.3 Standards, other than those related to 
cybersecurity, under an 18-month implementation timeline. The 
Commission requested comments on how best to proceed with the 
implementation of the remaining WEQ 003.3 Standards, including the 
standards related to PFV and those related to OASIS. Specifically, the 
Commission requested comments on whether the Commission should require 
the industry to implement WEQ Version 003.2 prior to WEQ Version 003.3, 
or, alternatively, cancel the implementation obligation of WEQ Version 
003.2 and instead require implementation of all accepted WEQ Version 
003.3 Standards, including the WEQ Version 003.2 Standards, within 18 
months.\53\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \53\ This would include all WEQ Version 003.3 Standards except 
for the WEQ cybersecurity standards which have an earlier 
implementation timeline, as discussed in the NOPR, as well as the 
implementation of the NAESB ATC-related standards contained in WEQ-
023, which will be coordinated with the retirement of the NERC MOD A 
Reliability Standards.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Comments
    44. Bonneville, EEI and OATI states the WEQ Version 003.2 Standards 
and the WEQ Version 003.3 Standards should have distinct, sequential 
implementation timelines that are separate and do not overlap.\54\ 
Bonneville states work is underway within the industry to implement the 
WEQ Version 003.2 Standards which should not be interrupted due to the 
Commission's adoption of the WEQ Version 003.3 Standards.\55\ EEI 
states the implementation of the different versions simultaneously are 
not necessarily simple upgrades, and OASIS updates, training and 
testing are required for successful implementation.\56\ OATI states 
separate implementation schedules will prevent wasted industry effort 
and cost.\57\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \54\ Bonneville Comments at 5; EEI Comments at 2-3, 6; OATI 
Comments at 2.
    \55\ Bonneville Comments at 5.
    \56\ EEI Comments at 6.
    \57\ OATI Comments at 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    45. OATI states that the Commission's proposed 18 month 
implementation period for the WEQ Version 003.3 Standards should begin 
after the implementation period for WEQ Version 003.2 Standards 
ends.\58\ Bonneville, however, recommends a shorter implementation 
period of at least 12 months, also starting no sooner than the final 
compliance deadline for the WEQ Version 003.2 Standards.\59\ The ISO/
RTO Council also supports an implementation date in October 2022 for 
the WEQ Version 3.3 Standards and recommends that the Commission 
provide public utilities with the option of implementing the WEQ 
Version 003.2 Standards either: (a) In October 2021 under the current 
implementation timeline for the WEQ Version 003.2 Standards and prior 
to WEQ Version 003.3 Standards; or (b) in October 2022 simultaneously 
with the WEQ Version 003.3 Standards.\60\ The ISO/RTO Council states 
that the Commission should also permit parties to submit a single 
compliance filing and intended implementation schedule for both WEQ 
Version 003.2 Standards and WEQ Version 003.3 Standards.\61\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \58\ Id. at 4.
    \59\ Bonneville Comments at 5.
    \60\ ISO/RTO Council Comments at 3.
    \61\ Id. at 11-12.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    46. The ISO/RTO Council also requests that the PFV Standards be 
implemented on an expedited timeline similar to the timeframe for the 
WEQ cybersecurity standards that is separate from the rest of the 
proposed modifications in the WEQ Version 003.3

[[Page 29498]]

Standards.\62\ The ISO/RTO Council states that the PFV Standards' 
enhanced congestion process will more accurately account for internal 
flows (i.e., network and native load calculations) by incorporating the 
use of real-time data into relief obligations calculated by the IDC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \62\ Id. at 2, 5, 11.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    47. Moreover, the ISO/RTO Council requests that the Commission 
ensure that the implementation timeline account for any external 
dependencies and system changes beyond a public utility's control but 
necessary for a public utility's implementation and compliance with the 
WEQ Version 003.3 Standards.\63\ For example, Bonneville and the ISO/
RTO Council reference new requirements for posting TLR curtailment on a 
public utilities' OASIS. This new TLR requirement necessitates certain 
changes to and/or information sourced from the Interchange Distribution 
Calculator/Enhanced Curtailment Calculator (IDC/ECC) tools \64\ in 
order to coordinate with the OASIS system enhancements.\65\ With 
respect to the modification of WEQ-001 addressing the OASIS curtailment 
postings, which requires data from the ECC tool to meet the posting 
requirements, Bonneville states the implementation timeline should be 
at least six months from the time that a mechanism is made available to 
access data from the ECC.\66\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \63\ Id. at 12.
    \64\ Specifically, the WEQ-001-28 business practice standard 
defines new requirements for posting TLR curtailment information on 
a public utility's OASIS website, and IDC changes required before a 
public utility may implement and comply with the PFV Standards.
    \65\ Bonneville Comments at 5-6; ISO/RTO Council Comments at 12.
    \66\ Bonneville Comments at 5-6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

3. Commission Determination
    48. The Commission recognized in the WEQ Version 003.3 NOPR the 
potential for confusion through implementation of Version 003.3 either 
immediately after or simultaneously with Version 003.2 implementation. 
In light of commenters' explanations as to the time needed and 
complexities involved to plan and complete the tasks associated in 
implementing the WEQ Version 003.2 Standards, we will not require the 
two implementation timelines for the WEQ Version 003.2 Standards and 
the WEQ Version 003.3 Standards to run concurrently. Accordingly, 
public utilities will continue to implement the changes incorporated by 
reference in Order No. 676-I, for the WEQ Version 003.2 Standards, 
under the current implementation timeline ending October 2021.\67\ For 
the WEQ Version 003.3 Standards incorporated by reference in this final 
rule,\68\ we conclude that a 15-month implementation period, beginning 
after the completion of the implementation timeline for the WEQ Version 
003.2 Standards, is sufficient for implementation of the WEQ Version 
003.3 Standards..\69\ As a result, public utilities will submit two 
compliance filings: the compliance filing for the WEQ Version 003.2 
Standards will remain due July 27, 2021, with implementation no earlier 
than October 27, 2021, and the compliance filing for the WEQ Version 
003.3 Standards, which we incorporate by reference in this final rule, 
will be due 12 months after implementation of the WEQ Version 003.2 
Standards, or no earlier than October 27, 2022. Again, the Commission 
will determine an implementation date for the WEQ Version 003.3 
Standards following the acceptance of the compliance filings, no 
earlier than three months following their submission (i.e., not before 
January 27, 2023), resulting in a 15-month implementation period. We 
decline to adopt the ISO/RTO Council's proposal to require both the WEQ 
Version 003.2 Standards and the WEQ Version 003.3 Standards to be 
incorporated using the same timeline, with both due to be implemented 
by October 2022. Delaying the current implementation timeline for the 
WEQ Version 003.2 Standards could result in additional industry effort 
and complicate implementation of the WEQ Version 003.3 Standards.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \67\ On April 3, 2020, the Commission granted an extension of 
time for public utilities to make the compliance filings required by 
Order No. 676-I. By this extension, the deadline for public 
utilities required to make a compliance filing through e-Tariff is 
extended from May 25, 2020, up to and including July 27, 2021. In 
its order(s) on compliance filings, the Commission will determine an 
implementation date for all utilities, including utilities whose 
tariffs incorporate each version of the NAESB standards, without 
modification, when the version is accepted by the Commission, no 
sooner than three months following the submission of compliance 
filings (i.e., October 27, 2021). See Notice of Extension of Time at 
2, Docket No. RM05-5-028 (issued Apr. 3, 2020).
    \68\ With two exceptions for the WEQ cybersecurity standards and 
PFV Standards, as described in P 49.
    \69\ By providing a fifteen-month implementation period, we 
account for any external dependencies and system changes beyond the 
control of a public utility but necessary for a public utility's 
implementation and compliance with the WEQ Version 003.3 Standards. 
However, if a public utility is unable to comply with the fifteen-
month implementation timeline, it may file a request for extension 
of time. The Commission will consider such requests on a case-by-
case basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    49. As noted above, for the revisions related to the surety 
assessment on cybersecurity performed by Sandia, which were included in 
the WEQ Version 003.3 Standards,\70\ we will require industry filers to 
submit compliance filings for these revised WEQ cybersecurity standards 
nine months after the publication of a final rule in this proceeding, 
with implementation required no sooner than three months after 
compliance filings are submitted to the Commission, for a total 
implementation period of at least 12 months from the issuance of this 
final rule. Moreover, we agree with the ISO/RTO Council request that 
the PFV Standards be implemented on the same expedited timeline 
provided for the WEQ cybersecurity standards, that is, separate and 
apart from the implementation of the rest of the proposed modifications 
in the WEQ Version 003.3 Standards. As a result, we will require 
industry filers to also submit compliance filings for the PFV 
Standards, nine months after the publication of this final rule, with 
implementation required no sooner than three months after compliance 
filings are submitted to the Commission, for a total implementation 
period of at least twelve months.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \70\ For the specific WEQ cybersecurity standards to be 
implemented under this separate timeline, please see Appendix I.

     50. Summary of Compliance Filings and Implementation Deadlines
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                               Compliance filings
 Business practice standards           due           Implementation date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
WEQ Version 003.3 \71\......  12 months after       No earlier than 3
                               implementation of     months following
                               the WEQ Version       compliance filings
                               003.2 Standards, or   submission (no
                               no earlier than       earlier than
                               October 27, 2022.     January 27, 2023).
Cybersecurity...............  9 months after        No sooner than 12
                               publication of this   months after
                               final rule in the     publication of this
                               Federal Register.     final rule in
                                                     Federal Register.
PFV.........................  9 months after        No sooner than 12
                               publication of this   months after
                               final rule in the     publication of this
                               Federal Register.     final rule in
                                                     Federal Register.
------------------------------------------------------------------------


[[Page 29499]]

    51. In keeping with the prior practice that the Commission adopted 
in Order No. 676-H, we are requiring public utilities and those 
entities with reciprocity tariffs to modify their open access 
transmission tariffs (OATT) to include the WEQ standards that we are 
incorporating by reference. In order to comply with this final rule, 
public utilities and entities with reciprocity tariffs must make a 
compliance filing through eTariff no later than 90 days from the date 
the final rule is published in the Federal Register, using an 
indeterminant effective date (12/31/9998) for the tariff records. The 
Commission will establish an effective date for the tariff changes in 
the order(s) on the compliance filings no earlier than five months from 
the date the final rule is published in the Federal Register.\72\ 
Should any public utility that has previously been granted a waiver of 
the regulations believe that its circumstances warrant a continued 
waiver, the public utility may file a request for a waiver wherein the 
public utility can detail the circumstances that it believes warrant a 
waiver.\73\ In its request for continued waiver, the public utility 
must include the date, docket number of the order(s) previously 
granting the waiver(s), and an explanation for why the waiver(s) was 
initially granted by the Commission. Any waiver requests must be filed 
at the same time with the public utility's compliance filing or in a 
separate FPA section 205 filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \71\ These include all of the WEQ Version 003.3 Standards except 
for the Business Practice Standards that address the cybersecurity 
and parallel flow visualization, as discussed in the body of this 
final rule.
    \72\ As we explained in Order No. 676-H, 148 FERC ] 61,205 at 
n.26, to the extent a public utility's OASIS obligations are 
administered by an independent system operator (ISO) or regional 
transmission operator (RTO) and are not covered in the public 
utility's OATT, the public utility will not need to modify its OATT 
to include the OASIS standards. Such a public utility will, however, 
be required to comply with these standards unless granted a waiver 
by the Commission. The business practice standards that we 
incorporate by reference into our regulations in this final rule 
govern the terms and conditions that public utilities must include 
in their OATTs and the transactions that entities enter with public 
utilities under these OATTs must be in accordance with the 
incorporated standards.
    \73\ Order No. 676-E, 129 FERC ] 61,162 at P 107.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Notice of Use of Voluntary Consensus Standards

    52. Office of Management and Budget Circular A-119 (section 11) 
(Feb. 10, 1998) provides that when a federal agency issues or revises a 
regulation containing a standard, the agency should publish a statement 
in the final rule stating whether the adopted standard is a voluntary 
consensus standard or a government-unique standard. In this final rule, 
the Commission is incorporating by reference voluntary consensus 
standards adopted by NAESB's WEQ.

V. Incorporation by Reference

    53. The Office of the Federal Register requires agencies 
incorporating material by reference in final rules to discuss, in the 
preamble of the final rule, the ways that the materials it incorporates 
by reference are reasonably available to interested parties and how 
interested parties can obtain the materials.\74\ The regulations also 
require agencies to summarize, in the preamble of the final rule, the 
material it incorporates by reference. The standards we are 
incorporating by reference in this final rule \75\ can be summarized as 
follows:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \74\ 1 CFR 51.5. See Incorporation by Reference, 79 FR 66267 
(Nov. 7, 2014).
    \75\ WEQ-000 Version 003.1 and WEQ-006 Version 003.1 were 
previously approved for incorporation by reference and continue to 
be referenced without change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    54. The WEQ-000 Abbreviations, Acronyms, and Definition of Terms 
Business Practice Standards provide a single location for all 
abbreviations, acronyms, and defined terms referenced in the WEQ 
Business Practice Standards. These standards provide common 
nomenclature for terms within the wholesale electric industry, thereby 
reducing confusion and opportunities for misinterpretation or 
misunderstandings among industry participants.
    55. The WEQ-001 OASIS Business Practice Standards define the 
general and specific transaction processing requirements and related 
business processes required for OASIS. The standards detail 
requirements related to standard terminology for transmission and 
ancillary services, attribute values defining transmission service 
class and type, ancillary and other services definitions, OASIS 
registration procedures, procurement of ancillary and other services, 
path naming, next hour market service, identical transmission service 
requests, redirects, resales, transfers, OASIS postings, procedures for 
addressing ATC or AFC methodology questions, rollover rights, 
conditional curtailment option reservations, auditing usage of Capacity 
Benefit Margin, coordination of requests for service across multiple 
transmission systems, consolidation, preemption and right-of-first 
refusal process, and NITS requests.
    56. The WEQ-002 OASIS Standards and Communication Protocols 
Business Practice Standards define the technical standards for OASIS. 
These standards detail network architecture requirements, information 
access requirements, OASIS and point-to-point interface requirements, 
implementation, and NITS interface requirements.
    57. The WEQ-003 OASIS Data Dictionary Business Practice Standards 
define the data element specifications for OASIS.
    58. The WEQ-004 Coordinate Interchange Business Practice Standards 
define the commercial processes necessary to facilitate interchange 
transactions via Request for Interchange and specify the arrangements 
and data to be communicated by the entity responsible for authorizing 
the implementation of such transactions (the entities responsible for 
balancing load and generation).
    59. The WEQ-005 Area Control Error (ACE) Equation Special Cases 
Business Practice Standards define commercial based requirements 
regarding the obligations of a balancing authority to manage the 
difference between scheduled and actual electrical generation within 
its control area. Each balancing authority manages its ACE in 
accordance with the NERC Reliability Standards. These standards detail 
requirements for jointly owned utilities, supplemental regulation 
service, and load or generation transfer by telemetry.
    60. The WEQ-007 Inadvertent Interchange Payback Business Practice 
Standards define the methods in which inadvertent energy is paid back, 
mitigating the potential for financial gain through the misuse of 
paybacks for inadvertent interchange. Inadvertent interchange is 
interchange that occurs when a balancing authority cannot fully balance 
generation and load within its area. The standards allow for the 
repayment of any imbalances through bilateral in-kind payback, 
unilateral in-kind payback, or other methods as agreed to.
    61. The WEQ-008 Transmission Loading Relief--Eastern 
Interconnection Business Practice Standards define the business 
practices for cutting transmission service during a TLR event. These 
standards detail requirements for the use of interconnection-wide TLR 
procedures, interchange transaction priorities for use with 
interconnection-wide TLR procedures, and the Eastern Interconnection 
procedure for physical curtailment of interchange transactions.
    62. The WEQ-011 Gas/Electric Coordination Business Practice 
Standards define communication protocols intended to improve 
coordination between the gas and electric industries in daily 
operational

[[Page 29500]]

communications between transportation service providers and gas-fired 
power plants. The standards include requirements for communicating 
anticipated power generation fuel for the upcoming day as well as any 
operating problems that might hinder gas-fired power plants from 
receiving contractual gas quantities.
    63. The WEQ-012 Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) Business Practice 
Standards establish the cybersecurity framework for parties partaking 
in transactions via a transmission provider's OASIS or e-Tagging 
system. The NAESB PKI framework secures wholesale electric market 
electronic commercial communications via encryption of data and the 
electronic authentication of parties to a transaction through the use 
of a digital certificate issued by a NAESB certified certificate 
authority. The standards define the requirements for parties utilizing 
the digital certificates issued by the NAESB certificate authorities.
    64. The WEQ-013 OASIS Implementation Guide Business Practice 
Standards detail the implementation of the OASIS Business Practice 
Standards. The standards detail requirements related to point-to-point 
OASIS transaction processing, OASIS template implementation, preemption 
and right-of-first-refusal processing, NITS application and 
modification of service processing, and secondary network transmission 
service.
    65. The WEQ-015 Measurement and Verification of Wholesale 
Electricity Demand Response Business Practice Standards define a common 
framework for transparency, consistency, and accountability applicable 
to the measurement and verification of wholesale electric market demand 
response practices. The standards describe performance evaluation 
methodology and criteria for the use of equipment, technology, and 
procedures to quantify the demand reduction value--the measurement of 
reduced electrical usage by a demand resource.
    66. The WEQ-021 Measurement and Verification of Energy Efficiency 
Products Business Practice Standards define a common framework for 
transparency, consistency, and accountability applicable to the 
measurement and verification of wholesale electric market energy 
efficiency practices. The standards establish energy efficiency 
measurement and verification criteria and define requirements for 
energy efficiency resource providers for the measurement and 
verification of energy efficiency products and services offered in the 
wholesale electric markets.
    67. The WEQ-022 EIR Business Practice Standards define the business 
requirements for entities utilizing the NAESB managed EIR, a wholesale 
electric industry tool that serves as the central repository for 
information needed in the scheduling of transmission through electronic 
transactions. The standards describe the roles within EIR, registration 
requirements, and cybersecurity.
    68. The WEQ-023 Modeling Business Practice Standards specify the 
requirements for calculation of ATCs and AFCs using the methodology 
selected. In the event of a conflict between these Business Practice 
Standards and the Transmission Service Provider's tariff or FERC 
approved seams agreement(s), the tariff or FERC approved seams 
agreement(s) shall have precedence.\76\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \76\ The suites of NAESB business practice standards we are not 
incorporating by reference in this final rule are: (1) The WEQ-009 
Standards of Conduct for Electric Transmission Providers, which 
NAESB has eliminated as they duplicate the Commission's regulations; 
(2) the WEQ-010 Contracts Related Business Practice Standards that 
establish model contracts for the wholesale electric industry, which 
the Commission has not incorporated as they are not mandatory; (3) 
the WEQ-014 WEQ/WGQ eTariff Related Business Practice Standards, 
which provide an implementation guide describing the various 
mechanisms, data tables, code values/reference tables, and technical 
specifications used in the submission of electronic tariff filings 
to the Commission, which the Commission has not incorporated as 
these submittals are governed by the Commission's eTariff 
regulations; and (4) the WEQ-016, WEQ-017, WEQ-018, WEQ-019, and 
WEQ-020 Business Practice Standards that were developed as part of 
the Smart Grid implementation and which the Commission adopted as 
non-mandatory guidance in 18 CFR 2.27 (2019). See Order No. 676-H, 
148 FERC ] 61,205; Order No. 676-I, 170 FERC ] 61,062, at n.102.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    69. Copies of the standards incorporated by reference may be 
obtained from NAESB, whose offices are located at 801 Travis Street, 
Suite 1675, Houston, TX 77002, Phone: (713) 356-0060. NAESB's website 
can be accessed at https://www.naesb.org. Once COVID restrictions are 
lifted, copies of the standards may be inspected at the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, Public Reference and Files Maintenance Branch, 
888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426, Phone: (202) 502-8371, 
https://www.ferc.gov.
    70. NAESB is a private, consensus standards developer that develops 
voluntary wholesale and retail standards related to the energy 
industry. The procedures utilized by NAESB make its standards 
reasonably available to those affected by the Commission's 
regulations.\77\ Participants can join NAESB, for an annual membership 
cost of $8,000, which entitles them to full participation in NAESB and 
enables them to obtain these standards at no additional cost.\78\ Non-
members may obtain the Individual Standards Manual or Booklet for $250 
per manual or booklet.\79\ Non-members also may obtain the complete set 
of Business Practice Standards on USB flash drive for $2,000. NAESB 
also provides a free electronic read-only version of the standards for 
a three-business day period or, in the case of a regulatory comment 
period, through the end of the comment period.\80\ In addition, NAESB 
considers requests for waivers of the charges on a case-by-case basis 
based on need.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \77\ As a private, consensus standards developer, NAESB needs 
the funds obtained from its membership fees and sales of its 
Individual Standards Manual or Booklet to finance the organization. 
The parties affected by these Commission regulations generally are 
highly sophisticated and have the means to acquire the information 
they need to effectively participate in Commission proceedings.
    \78\ NAESB, NAESB Membership Application, https://www.naesb.org/pdf4/naesbapp.pdf.
    \79\ NAESB, NAESB Materials Order Form, https://www.naesb.org/pdf/ordrform.pdf.
    \80\ Procedures for non-members to evaluate work products before 
purchasing are available at https://www.naesb.org/misc/NAESB_Nonmember_Evaluation.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

VI. Information Collection Statement

    71. The following collection of information contained in this final 
rule is subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 
under section 3507(d) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 
3507(d).\81\ OMB's regulations require approval of certain information 
collection requirements imposed by agency rules.\82\ Upon approval of a 
collection(s) of information, OMB will assign an OMB control number and 
an expiration date. Respondents subject to the filing requirements of 
this rule will not be penalized for failing to respond to these 
collections of information unless the collections of information 
display a valid OMB control number.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \81\ 44 U.S.C. 3507(d).
    \82\ 5 CFR 1320.11.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    72. The Commission solicits comments on the Commission's need for 
this information, whether the information will have practical utility, 
the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, ways to enhance the 
quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected, and 
any suggested methods for minimizing respondents' burden, including the 
use of automated information techniques.
    73. The following burden estimate is based on the projected costs 
for the industry to implement the new and revised business practice 
standards

[[Page 29501]]

adopted by NAESB and proposed to be incorporated by reference in this 
final rule.\83\ The NERC Compliance Registry, as of March 5, 2021, 
identifies approximately 162 entities in the United States that are 
subject to this final rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \83\ Commission staff estimates that industry is similarly 
situated in terms of hourly cost (wages plus benefits). Based on the 
Commission average cost (wages plus benefits) for 2020, $83.00/hour 
is used.

                                                         Docket Nos. RM05-5-029 and RM05-05-030
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                      Annual number
                                        Number of      of responses    Total number   Average burden (hrs.) & cost ($)  Total annual burden hrs. & total
                                       respondents    per respondent   of responses              per response                    annual cost ($)
                                                (1)              (2)     (1) * (2) =  (4).............................  (3) * (4) = (5)
                                                                                 (3)
                                    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FERC-516E..........................             162                1             162  6 hrs.; $498....................  972 hrs.; $80,676.
FERC-717...........................             162                1             162  30 hrs.; $2,490.................  4,860 hrs.; $403,380.
                                    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total..........................  ..............  ...............             324  $2,988..........................  5,832 hrs.; $484,056.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Costs to Comply with Paperwork Requirements:
    The estimated annual costs are as follows:
    FERC-516E: 162 entities x 1 response/entity (6 hours/response x 
$83.00/hour) = $80,676.
    FERC-717: 162 entities x 1 response/entity (30 hours/response x 
$83.00/hour) = $403,380.
    Titles: FERC-516E, Electric Rate Schedule and Tariff Filings and 
FERC-717, Standards for Business Practices and Communication Protocols 
for Public Utilities.
    Action: Final rule.
    OMB Control Nos: 1902-0290 (FERC-516E) and 1902-0173 (FERC-717).
    Respondents: Business or other for profit, and not for profit 
institutions.
    Frequency of Responses: One-time.
    Necessity of the Information: This rule will amend its regulations 
to incorporate by reference the latest version (Version 003.3) of the 
Standards for Business Practices and Communication Protocols for Public 
Utilities adopted by the Wholesale Electric Quadrant (WEQ) of the North 
American Energy Standards Board (NAESB). WEQ Version 003.3 includes 
standards developed in accordance with recommendations of the 
Department of Energy sponsored cybersecurity surety assessment of the 
NAESB Business Practice Standards that was conducted in 2019. 
Additional standards were developed in response to the directives from 
FERC Order No. 890, such as the standards developed to support Parallel 
Flow Visualization, intended to improve congestion management 
procedures for the Eastern Interconnection. The WEQ Version 003.3 
Standards also include, in their entirety, the WEQ-023 Modeling 
Business Practice Standards contained in the WEQ Version 003.1 
Standards, which address the technical issues affecting ATC and AFC 
calculation for wholesale electric transmission services, with the 
addition of certain revisions and corrections. The revisions made by 
NAESB in the WEQ Version 003.3 Standards are designed to aid public 
utilities with the consistent and uniform implementation of 
requirements promulgated by the Commission as part of the pro forma 
Open Access Transmission Tariff.
    Internal review: The Commission has reviewed NAESB's proposal and 
has made a preliminary determination that the proposed revisions are 
both necessary and useful. In addition, the Commission has assured 
itself, by means of its internal review, that there is specific, 
objective support for the burden estimates associated with the 
information requirements.
    74. Interested persons may obtain information on the reporting 
requirements by contacting the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 
Office of the Executive Director, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 
20426 [Attention: Ellen Brown, email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ffbb9e8b9ebc939a9e8d9e919c9abf999a8d9cd1989089"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a6e2c7d2c7e5cac3c7d4c7c8c5c3e6c0c3d4c588c1c9d0">[email protected]</span></a>, phone: 
(202) 502-8663].

VII. Environmental Analysis

    75. The Commission is required to prepare an Environmental 
Assessment or an Environmental Impact Statement for any action that may 
have a significant adverse effect on the human environment.\84\ The 
Commission has categorically excluded certain actions from these 
requirements as not having a significant effect on the human 
environment.\85\ The actions adopted here fall within categorical 
exclusions in the Commission's regulations for rules that are 
clarifying, corrective, or procedural, for information gathering 
analysis, and dissemination, and for sales, exchange, and 
transportation of natural gas and electric power that requires no 
construction of facilities. Therefore, an environmental assessment is 
unnecessary and has not been prepared in this final rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \84\ Regulations Implementing the Nat'l Envt'l Pol'y Act, Order 
No. 486, 52 FR 47897 (Dec. 17, 1987), FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 30,783 
(1987) (cross-referenced at 41 FERC ] 61,284).
    \85\ 18 CFR 380.4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

VIII. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    76. The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA) \86\ generally 
requires a description and analysis of final rules that will have 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. 
The RFA does not mandate any particular outcome in a rulemaking. It 
only requires consideration of alternatives that are less burdensome to 
small entities and an agency explanation of why alternatives were 
rejected.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \86\ 5 U.S.C. 601-612.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    77. The Small Business Administration (SBA) revised its size 
standards (effective January 22, 2014) for electric utilities from a 
standard based on megawatt hours to a standard based on the number of 
employees, including affiliates. Under SBA's standards, some 
transmission owners will fall under the following category and 
associated size threshold: electric bulk power transmission and 
control, at 500 employees.\87\ The Commission estimates that 24 of the 
162 respondents are small or 14.8 percent of the respondents affected 
by this final rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \87\ 13 CFR 121.201, Sector 22 (Utilities), NAICS code 221121 
(Electric Bulk Power Transmission and Control).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    78. The Commission estimates that the impact on these entities is 
consistent with the paperwork burden of $2,988 per entity used 
above.\88\ The Commission does not consider $2,988 to be a significant 
economic impact. Based on the above, the Commission certifies that 
implementation of the proposed Business Practice Standards will not 
have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. 
Accordingly, no initial regulatory flexibility analysis is required.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \88\ 36 hours at $83.00/hour = $2,988.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 29502]]

IX. Document Availability

    79. In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the 
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an 
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the 
internet through FERC's Home Page (https://www.ferc.gov). At this time, 
the Commission has suspended access to the Commission's Public 
Reference Room due to the President's March 13, 2020 proclamation 
declaring a National Emergency concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease 
(COVID-19).
    80. From FERC's Home Page on the internet, this information is 
available on eLibrary. The full text of this document is available on 
eLibrary in PDF and Microsoft Word format for viewing, printing, and/or 
downloading. To access this document in eLibrary, type the docket 
number excluding the last three digits of this document in the docket 
number field.
    81. User assistance is available for eLibrary and the FERC's 
website during normal business hours from FERC Online Support at 202-
502-6652 (toll free at 1-866-208-3676) or email at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a6c0c3d4c5c9c8cacfc8c3d5d3d6d6c9d4d2e6c0c3d4c588c1c9d0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="593f3c2b3a36373530373c2a2c2929362b2d193f3c2b3a773e362f">[email protected]</span></a>, or the Public Reference Room at (202) 502-
8371, TTY (202)502-8659. Email the Public Reference Room at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#027277606e6b612c7067646770676c6167706d6d6f42646770612c656d74"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9fefeafdf3f6fcb1edfaf9faedfaf1fcfaedf0f0f2dff9faedfcb1f8f0e9">[email protected]</span></a>.

X. Effective Date and Congressional Notification

    82. These regulations are effective August 2, 2021. The Commission 
has determined, with the concurrence of the Administrator of the Office 
of Information and Regulatory Affairs of OMB, that this rule is not a 
``major rule'' as defined in section 351 of the Small Business 
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996. The Final Rule will be 
submitted to the Senate, House, and Government Accountability Office.

List of Subjects

18 CFR Part 37

    Electric power, Electric utilities.

18 CFR Part 38

    Business practice standards, Electric utilities, Incorporation by 
reference, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    By the Commission.

    Issued: May 20, 2021.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Commission amends parts 37 
and 38, chapter I, title 18, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:

PART 37--OPEN ACCESS SAME-TIME INFORMATION SYSTEMS

0
1. The authority citation for part 37 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  16 U.S.C. 791-825r, 2601-2645; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 42 
U.S.C. 7101-7352.


0
2. Amend Sec.  37.6 by revising paragraph (b)(2)(i) to read as follows:


Sec.  37.6  Information to be posted on the OASIS.

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (2) * * *
    (i) Information used to calculate any posting of ATC and TTC must 
be dated and time-stamped and all calculations shall be performed 
according to consistently applied methodologies referenced in the 
Transmission Provider's transmission tariff and shall be based on 
Commission-approved Reliability Standards, business practice and 
electronic communication standards, and related implementation 
documents, as well as current industry practices, standards and 
criteria. Such calculations shall be conducted in a manner that is 
transparent, consistent with anticipated system conditions and outages 
for the relevant timeframe, and not unduly discriminatory or 
preferential.
* * * * *

PART 38--STANDARDS FOR PUBLIC UTILITY BUSINESS OPERATIONS AND 
COMMUNICATIONS

0
3. The authority citation for part 38 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 791-825r, 2601-2645; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 42 
U.S.C. 7101-7352.


0
4. Revise Sec.  38.1 to read as follows:


Sec.  38.1   Incorporation by reference of North American Energy 
Standards Board Wholesale Electric Quadrant standards.

    (a) Any public utility that owns, operates, or controls facilities 
used for the transmission of electric energy in interstate commerce or 
for the sale of electric energy at wholesale in interstate commerce and 
any non-public utility that seeks voluntary compliance with 
jurisdictional transmission tariff reciprocity conditions must comply 
with the business practice and electronic communication standards 
promulgated by the North American Energy Standards Board (NAESB) 
Wholesale Electric Quadrant (WEQ) that are incorporated by reference in 
paragraph (b) of this section.
    (b)(1) The material incorporated by reference in this section was 
approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. All approved material may be inspected 
at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Public Reference and Files 
Maintenance Branch, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426, Tel: 
(202) 502-8371, www.ferc.gov, and is available from the sources listed 
in paragraph (b)(2) of this section. It is also available for 
inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). 
For information on the availability of this material at NARA, email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9ff9fafbedfaf8b1f3faf8fef3dff1feedfeb1f8f0e9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="690f0c0d1b0c0e47050c0e08052907081b08470e061f">[email protected]</span></a>, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html .
    (2) North American Energy Standards Board (NAESB), 801 Travis 
Street, Suite 1675, Houston, TX 77002, Tel: (713) 356-0060. NAESB's 
website is at https://www.naesb.org/. The NAESB WEQ Business Practice 
Standards; Standards and Models the Commission incorporates by 
reference are as follows:
    (i) WEQ-000, Abbreviations, Acronyms, and Definition of Terms (WEQ 
Version 003.1, September 30, 2015) (including only the definitions of 
Interconnection Time Monitor, Time Error, and Time Error Correction);
    (ii) WEQ-000, Abbreviations, Acronyms, and Definition of Terms (WEQ 
Version 003.3, March 30, 2020);
    (iii) WEQ-001, Open Access Same-Time Information Systems (OASIS), 
(WEQ Version 003.3, March 30, 2020);
    (iv) WEQ-002, Open Access Same-Time Information Systems (OASIS) 
Business Practice Standards and Communication Protocols (S&CP), (WEQ 
Version 003.3, March 30, 2020);
    (v) WEQ-003, Open Access Same-Time Information Systems (OASIS) Data 
Dictionary, (WEQ Version 003.3, March 30, 2020);
    (vi) WEQ-004, Coordinate Interchange (WEQ Version 003.3, March 30, 
2020);
    (vii) WEQ-005, Area Control Error (ACE) Equation Special Cases (WEQ 
Version 003.3, March 30, 2020);
    (viii) WEQ-006, Manual Time Error Correction (WEQ Version 003.1, 
Sept. 30, 2015);
    (ix) WEQ-007, Inadvertent Interchange Payback (WEQ Version 003.3, 
March 30, 2020);
    (x) WEQ-008, Transmission Loading Relief (TLR)--Eastern 
Interconnection (WEQ Version 003.3, March 30, 2020);
    (xi) WEQ-011, Gas/Electric Coordination (WEQ Version 003.3, March 
30, 2020);
    (xii) WEQ-012, Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) (WEQ Version 003.3, 
March 30, 2020);
    (xiii) WEQ-013, Open Access Same-Time Information Systems (OASIS)

[[Page 29503]]

Implementation Guide, (WEQ Version 003.3, March 30, 2020);
    (xiv) WEQ-015, Measurement and Verification of Wholesale 
Electricity Demand Response (WEQ Version 003.3, March 30, 2020);
    (xv) WEQ-021, Measurement and Verification of Energy Efficiency 
Products (WEQ Version 003.3, March 30, 2020);
    (xvi) WEQ-022, Electric Industry Registry (WEQ Version 003.3, March 
30, 2020); and
    (xvii) WEQ-023, Modeling. (WEQ Version 003.3, March 30, 2020).

    Note:  The following appendix will not be published in the Code 
of Federal Regulations

Appendix I

    Standards Affected by the Revisions To Implement Recommendations
          Following Sandia's Surety Assessment on Cybersecurity
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Standard                            Revisions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                WEQ-000-1
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Deleted seven abbreviations/acronyms...  DNS--Domain Name Service.
                                         IPCP--Internet Protocol Control
                                          Protocol.
                                         NTP--Network Time Protocol.
                                         PPP--Point to Point Protocol.
                                         SLIP--Serial Line Internet
                                          Protocol.
                                         SNMP--Simple Network Management
                                          Protocol.
                                         SSL--Secure Sockets Layer.
Added one abbreviation/acronym.........  OWASP--Open Web Application
                                          Security Project.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                 WEQ-001
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revised one standard...................  WEQ-001-13.1.3.3.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                 WEQ-002
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revised 14 standards...................  WEQ-002-2.3.
                                         WEQ-002-2.4.
                                         WEQ-002-4.2.1.1.
                                         WEQ-002-4.2.1.2.
                                         WEQ-002-4.2.1.3.
                                         WEQ-002-4.2.2.
                                         WEQ-002-5.
                                         WEQ-002-5.1.1.
                                         WEQ-002-5.1.2.
                                         WEQ-002-5.1.3.
                                         WEQ-002-5.6.
                                         WEQ-002-101.2.3.1.
                                         WEQ-002-101.3.3.2.
                                         WEQ-002-101.3.3.3.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2021-11352 Filed 6-1-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>