alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-6914

Polaris Industries Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

“Made in China 2025” or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 53 (Monday, March 20, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 14739]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6791]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management; Waste Acceptance 
Issues

AGENCY: Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, Department of 
Energy.

ACTION: Notice of Availability of the Response Summary Report for the 
Department of Energy's Notice of Inquiry on Waste Acceptance Issues.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Energy published a Notice of Inquiry on May 
25, 1994, to elicit the views of affected parties on: (1) The 
Department's preliminary view that it does not have a statutory 
obligation to accept spent nuclear fuel in 1998 in the absence of an 
operational repository or a suitable storage facility constructed under 
the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, as amended; (2) the need for an 
interim, away-from-reactor storage facility prior to repository 
operations; and (3) options for offsetting, through the use of the 
Nuclear Waste Fund, a portion of the financial burden that may be 
incurred by utilities in continuing to store spent nuclear fuel at 
reactor sites beyond 1998 (59 FR 27007). The Notice of Inquiry 
implemented the Secretary's initiative to invite the views of 
interested parties and to advance the consensus-building process on 
resolving these important issues.
    The Notice of Inquiry requested written comments on or before 
September 22, 1994. In response to a request from six organizations, 
the Department published a Notice on October 18, 1994, announcing the 
reopening of this comment period until December 19, 1994 (59 FR 52524). 
The Department received more than 1,100 comment letters in response to 
the Notice of Inquiry.
    The purpose of this Notice is to announce the availability of the 
Notice of Inquiry on Waste Acceptance Issues -- Response Summary Report 
which the Department prepared to present a summary of the comments 
received in response to the Notice of Inquiry. The Department is 
currently reviewing the comments for the purpose of preparing its 
response to the issues set forth in the Notice of Inquiry.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the report may be obtained by writing: OCRWM 
Information Center, P.O. Box 44375, Washington, DC 20026, or by phone: 
(800) 225-NWPA (6972), (202) 488-5513 (in the Washington, DC area).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. David Zabransky at the address 
above, or by telephone at (202) 586-7346 or Mr. Robert Waxman of the 
Office of General Counsel at (202) 586-6975.

    Issued in Washington, DC, March 15, 1995.
Daniel A. Dreyfus,
Director, Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management.
[FR Doc. 95-6791 Filed 3-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4327

SPM Flow Control, Inc. DBA Weir SPM:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 9 (Friday, January 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3275-3276]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-870]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Geosciences; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Geosciences 
(#1756). [[Page 3276]] 
    Date and Time: Tuesday, January 30--Thursday, February 2, 1995; 
8:30 AM-5:00 PM.
    Place: Rooms 310, 320 (T-W), 340 and 360 (T-W), Stafford Place, 
4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Michael R. Reeve, Section Head, National 
Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. 
Telephone: (703) 306-1582.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate Ocean Sciences Research (OSRS) 
proposals as part of the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: January 9, 1995.
Linda Allen-Benton,
Deputy Division Director, HRM.
[FR Doc. 95-870 Filed 1-12-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5840

Magna Electronics: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_05.09.19.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6003

Peabody Energy Corporation:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
[J-22-2019] [MO: Wecht, J.]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

US AIRWAYS, INC. AND SEDGWICK 

CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, 

INC.,

Appellants

v.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL 

BOARD (BOCKELMAN),

Appellees

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 35 WAP 2018

Appeal from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court entered 

February 22, 2018 at No. 612 CD 

2017, affirming the Order of the 

Workers' Compensation Appeal Board 

dated April 19, 2017 at No. A16-0545.

ARGUED: May 14, 2019

CONCURRING OPINION

JUSTICE DOUGHERTY DECIDED: NOVEMBER 20, 2019

I concur in the result reached by the majority. I write separately to note my concern 

that the majority’s opinion might be read as expanding Epler v. North American Rockwell 

Corp., 393 A.2d 1163 (Pa. 1978), to all avenues of ingress to and egress from the 

workplace. I do not approve of such a broad reading, and thus emphasize the majority’s

holding is limited to the discrete facts of this case. Majority Opinion, slip op. at 13. 

Specifically, the record reveals US Airways was legally obligated to reimburse 

claimant for parking expenses under the applicable collective bargaining agreement, and 

ostensibly complied with this contractual obligation by purchasing the required SIDA 

badge for claimant and thereby sponsoring her airport parking. Moreover, due to the 

expansive geographical size of the Philadelphia International Airport (and the strict

security requirements inherent in modern-day airport terminal access), when claimant
[J-22-2019] [MO: Wecht, J.] - 2

used the SIDA badge provided by her employer US Airways to enter the secure employee 

parking lot, she had no realistic choice but to use the employee shuttle bus to enter and 

exit from the terminal — her workplace. In my view, these circumstances in particular 

indicate claimant’s use of the shuttle bus was connected with and integral to her 

employer’s operations at the Philadelphia International Airport, and the Commonwealth 

Court correctly determined she is entitled to workers’ compensation benefits as a result 

of her injury on that bus.

1

 

1

I respectfully distance myself from the majority’s unnecessary additional holding 

regarding the employee parking lot, which is not at issue in this appeal. See Majority 

Opinion, slip op. at 13 (“Given these facts, we have little difficulty concluding that the 

parking lot and shuttle were connected with, and thus integral to, US Airways’ business 

operations at the Philadelphia International Airport.”) (emphasis added).
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of American Bio Medica Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2010 (the "Report"), I,
Stefan Parker, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Stefan ParkerStefan
      ParkerChief
      Financial OfficerPrincipal
      Financial OfficerExecutive
      Vice President, FinanceJanuary
      19, 2010
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 63 (Monday, April 3, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16917-16918]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8102]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
[Dept. Circ. 570, 1994 Rev., Supp. No. 16]


Surety Companies Acceptable on Federal Bonds; Financial Pacific 
Insurance Company

    A Certificate of Authority as an acceptable surety on Federal Bonds 
is hereby issued to the following company [[Page 16918]] under Sections 
9304 to 9308, Title 31, of the United States Code. Federal bond-
approving officers should annotate their reference copies of the 
Treasury Circular 570, 1994 Revision, on page 34155 to reflect this 
addition:
    Financial Pacific Insurance Company. Business address: P.O. Box 
292220, Sacramento, California, 95829-2220. Phone: (916) 381-8067. 
Underwriting Limitation b/: $589,000. Surety Licenses c/: CA. 
Incorporated in: California.
    Certificates of Authority expire on June 30 each year, unless 
revoked prior to that date. The Certificates are subject to subsequent 
annual renewal as long as the companies remain qualified (31 CFR, Part 
223). A list of qualified companies is published annually as of July 1 
in Treasury Department Circular 570, with details as to underwriting 
limitations, areas in which licensed to transact surety business and 
other information.
    Copies of the Circular may be obtained from the Surety Bond Branch, 
Funds Management Division, Financial Management Service, Department of 
the Treasury, Hyattsville, MD 20782, telephone (202) 874-6765.

    Dated: March 27, 1995.
Charles F. Schwan III,
Director, Funds Management Division, Financial Management Service.
[FR Doc. 95-8102 Filed 3-31-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent 

 v. 

CAMERON ARTHUR HARINARAIN, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 159 MM 2014 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 21st day of November, 2014, the Petition for Leave to File 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             140
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      947
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      4,576
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,318
<PP&E>                                             707
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,058
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,287
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            90
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,550
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,058
<SALES>                                          2,897
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,897
<CGS>                                            4,239
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,239
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,789
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  73
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,204)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,204)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (2,221)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (13,425)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (1.87)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.87)


</TABLE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5961

Peabody Energy Corporation:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-6706

Pall Corporation:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

“Made in China 2025” or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel