alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Lorus Therapeutics Inc.
(the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ended May 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gregory Chow, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the “Exchange Act”); and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as
of the end of the period covered by the Report and the results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: July 30, 2014     | 
|----------------------- | 
|                        | 
|/s/ Gregory Chow        | 
|Gregory Chow            | 
|Chief Financial Officer | 



This certification shall not be deemed “filed” for
purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of Section 18 of the Exchange Act. Such certification
shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange
Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7024

Magna Electronics Technology, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION




OF




CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER




AND




CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER




PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Richard Man Fai LEE, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of China
Premium Lifestyle Enterprise, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of China Premium Lifestyle Enterprise,
Inc.




I, Joseph Tik Tung WONG, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of China
Premium Lifestyle Enterprise, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of China Premium Lifestyle Enterprise,
Inc.




May
      28, 2010
              By:
              /s/ Richard Man Fai LEERichard
      Man Fai LEEChief
      Executive OfficerMay
      28, 2010
              By:
              /s/ Joseph Tik Tung WONGJoseph
      Tik Tung WONGChief
      Financial Officer, Treasurer and
Secretary





This certification accompanies the
Form 10-Q/A to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any
filing of China Premium Lifestyle Enterprise, Inc. under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether
made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q/A), irrespective of any
general incorporation language contained in such filing.
**EXHIBIT 32.01**

** **

**Section 1350 Certification**

** **

**Inconnection with this quarterly report of ML Aspect FuturesAccess LLC (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this “Report”),I, Justin C. Ferri, Chief Executive Officer, President and Manager of MerrillLynch Alternative Investments LLC, the manager of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:**

** **

1.This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
| Date:   August 14, 2009      |                 |
|----------------------------------------|----------------------|
|                                   |                 |
| By                                     | /s/  JUSTIN C. FERRI |   |
| Justin  C. Ferri                       |                 |
| Chief  Executive Officer and President |                 |
| (Principal Executive Officer)          |                 |
|                                        |                      |  |

 

1

----
Opinion issued May 7 , 2024

In The 

## Court of Appeals

For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01

- 24

- 00286

- CV

——————————— IN RE PS LPT PROPERTIES INVESTORS , Relat or

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDU M OPINION
Relator, PS LPT Properties Investors, has filed a petition for writ of
mandamus challenging the trial court’s order denying relator’s motion to compel

arbitration. 1 We deny the petition.

1 The underlying case is Charles Santiago v. PS LPT Properties Investors
, cause number 2023

- 33104 , pending in the 133rd District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Jaclanel McFarland presiding.2 PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Goodman, Landau, and Hightower.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.3

                         CMC SECURITIES CORPORATION II
                                  LISTING OF
                    OFFICER'S CERTIFICATES OF THE SERVICERS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                              DATE OF
               SERVICER                     CERTIFICATE
----------------------------------------  ---------------
<S>                                       <C>

Boatmen's National Mortgage, Inc.            July 1, 1996
California Federal Bank (Cal Fed)          March 15, 1996
Capstead Mortgage Corporation               June 27, 1996
Charter Mortgage Investments                June 26, 1996
Citfed Mortgage Corporation of America      June 26, 1996
Colonial Savings                                      N/A
CoreStates Mortgage Services Corporation    June 27, 1996
Dale Mortgage Bankers Corp.                   May 1, 1996
Fleet Mortgage Group Inc.                    July 8, 1996
First Nationwide Mortgage Corporation       March 8, 1996
GE Capital Mortgage Services, Inc.         March 29, 1996
GMAC Mortgage Corporation of PA            March 18, 1996
LaSalle Home Mortgage Corporation                     N/A
Matrix Financial Services Corporation                 N/A
Mercantile Bank of St. Louis, N.A.          July 25, 1996
MLF Bancorp, Inc.                          April 24, 1996
Navy Federal Credit Union                   March 7, 1997
Old Kent Mortgage Services, Inc.           March 28, 1996
Southern National Corporation               April 9, 1996
Standard Mortgage Corporation                July 1, 1996
Stillwater National Bank & Trust Co.       March 26, 1996
 (Southwest Bancorp)
Universal American Mortgage Company        March 17, 1997
Western Financial Savings Bank             April 27, 1996
York Federal Savings & Loan (York         August 19, 1996
 Financial Corp.)
</TABLE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5794

Tianhai Electric North America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MOHAMMED S. SHAMEEM; SHARON

SABINA BEGUM,

 Petitioners,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-71852

Agency Nos. A078-670-558

 A078-670-559

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 26, 2012** 

Before: SCHROEDER, HAWKINS, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

Mohammed S. Shameem and Sharon Sabina Begum, natives and citizens of

Fiji, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order

denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under

FILED

OCT 29 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-71852

8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for an abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a

motion to reopen. Toufighi v. Mukasey, 538 F.3d 988, 992 (9th Cir. 2008). We

deny the petition for review. 

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion to

reopen as untimely where the motion was filed over seven years after the BIA’s

final order, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and petitioners failed to present sufficient

evidence of changed circumstances in Fiji to qualify for the regulatory exception to

the time limit for filing motions to reopen, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii); see

Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 987 (9th Cir. 2010) (evidence of changed

circumstances must be qualitatively different from what could have been presented

at the prior hearing). In light of this conclusion, the BIA did not abuse its

discretion in not addressing petitioners’ arguments regarding a pattern or practice

of persecution of Indo-Fijians and Muslims, or their claims for withholding of

removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture. 

We reject petitioners’ contention that the BIA failed to consider evidence

because they have not overcome the presumption that the BIA reviewed the record. 

See Fernandez v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 592, 603 (9th Cir. 2006). We also reject

petitioners’ contention that the BIA failed to provide a reasoned explanation for its
3 09-71852

decision. See Najmabadi, 597 F.3d at 990 (“[t]he [BIA] does not have to write an

exegesis on every contention”) (internal quotes omitted).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-7338

BYD Motors Inc: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7206

Omron Management Center of America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5370

Arrowhead Electrical Products, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Elite
Cosmetics, Inc. for the quarter ending July 31, 2005, I, Glen Landry, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Elite Cosmetics, Inc. hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

     1.   Such Quarterly Report on amended Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending
          July 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
          the quarter ending July 31, 2005, fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Elite
          Cosmetics, Inc.

Dated:  October 18, 2005

ELITE COSMETICS, INC.

By: /s/ Glen Landry
-------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5297

Arrowhead Electrical Products, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 16, 2018

No. 04

- 17

- 00645

- CR

Gloria R. PROO,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 379th J udicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR2757A

Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

The Appellant ’ s Motion to Reschedule Oral Argument is hereby GRANTED.

It is so ORDERED on November 16 , 2018.



### PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Juma Technology, Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony Fernandez, the
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Anthony
      FernandezAnthony
      Fernandez
                        Chief
      Financial
Officer




August
13, 2009
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 17, 2015.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, April 17, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A15D0330. DARNELL NOLLEY v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2011CR786