alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7227

Omron Management Center of America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5186 

To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to reauthorize the voluntary public 

access and habitat incentive program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 11, 2023 

Mrs. DINGELL (for herself and Mr. JOHNSON of South Dakota) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to reauthorize 

the voluntary public access and habitat incentive program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Voluntary Public Ac5 cess Improvement Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. VOLUNTARY PUBLIC ACCESS AND HABITAT INCEN7 TIVE PROGRAM. 

8 Section 1240R(f)(1) of the Food Security Act of 

9 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3839bb–5(f)(1)) is amended— 

10 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ after ‘‘2018,’’; and 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5186 IH

1 (2) by inserting ‘‘, and $150,000,000 for the 

2 period of fiscal years 2024 through 2028’’ before the 

3 period at the end. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6852

Otis Elevator Co.:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_05.09.19.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 TWEETER HOME ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tweeter Home Entertainment Group, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph G. McGuire, Senior Vice-President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition of the Company as of December 31, 2004 and results of operations of the Company
for the three months ended December 31, 2004. /s/ Joseph G. McGuireJoseph G. McGuire, Senior Vice-President andChief Financial OfficerFebruary 9, 2005
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5274 

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to expand working hours 

for employees between the ages of 14 and 16 years during periods 

in which schools are in session, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 25, 2023 

Mr. JOHNSON of South Dakota (for himself and Mr. NEHLS) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the 

Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to expand 

working hours for employees between the ages of 14 

and 16 years during periods in which schools are in 

session, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Teenagers Earning 

5 Everyday Necessary Skills Act’’ or the ‘‘TEENS Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CHILD LABOR HOURS AND EXEMPTIONS. 

7 Section 3(l) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 

8 (29 U.S.C. 203(l)) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5274 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘virture’’ and inserting ‘‘virtue’’; 

2 and 

3 (2) by striking the period at the end and insert4 ing ‘‘, except that in no case may the Secretary pro5 vide that employment of such employees is deemed 

6 to constitute oppressive child labor due to the num7 ber of hours an employee works if such employee— 

8 ‘‘(1) in a week during any part of which school 

9 is in session, works 24 hours or less; and 

10 ‘‘(2) begins work at a time that is not earlier 

11 than 7:00 a.m. (in the time zone in which the em12 ployment is performed) and ends work at a time 

13 that is not later than 9:00 p.m. (in such time 

14 zone).’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT
32.1
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED,
 PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report of Multimedia Games, Inc.
(the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended
September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the “Report”), the undersigned, Anthony M. Sanfilippo, Chief
Executive Officer, and Randy S. Cieslewicz, Chief Financial Officer, of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), that, to my
knowledge:
  (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m);
      and
  (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
  Dated:
      January 28, 2009
              /s/
      Anthony M. SanfilippoAnthony
      M. SanfilippoChief
      Executive Officer/s/
      Randy S. CieslewiczRandy
      S. CieslewiczChief
      Financial Officer
  A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Multimedia Games, Inc., and will
be retained by Multimedia Games, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Gary L. FELDMANN, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Paul S. McNEILL, Jr., Director of Revenue, Respondent-Appellant.

No. 56040.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

June 27, 1989.

William. L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Mary Browning, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent-appellant.

Frederick H. Schwetye, Union, Melvin G. Franke, Villa Ridge, for petitioner-respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant (Director) appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting a petition for review by respondent (Driver) and enjoining Director from revoking driver’s operating license. We reverse.

On March 31, 1988, Director mailed a notice to Driver that his driving privileges in Missouri would be revoked for a period of one year beginning May 13, 1988, for failure to take a chemical test. Driver filed his petition for review on July 28, 1988, 116 days after notice is presumed to have been *410received by Driver. *See*Section 302.515.2, RSMo (1986). On November 21, 1988, an Assistant Prosecuting Attorney confessed judgment on behalf of Director and the trial court entered judgment for Driver and enjoined Director from revoking Driver’s operating license.

This issue has been decided repeatedly by our courts. The trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because Driver failed to file his petition for review within the thirty-day time limit proscribed by Section 302.311, RSMo (1986). *See Palazzolo v. Director of Revenue,*760 S.W.2d 190, 191 (Mo.App.1988). The fact that the Assistant Prosecuting Attorney confessed judgment does nothing to alter the lack of subject matter jurisdiction. *See McGee v. Director of Revenue,*767 S.W.2d 630, 631 (Mo.App.1989).

Judgment reversed.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6301

Speck Pumps-Pool Products, Inc: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions.

pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Leslie Alan DELBRUEGGE, Appellant.

No. 63705.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

Nov. 8, 1994.

Donald K. Gerard, Clayton, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Joanne E. Beal, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before SMITH, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and WHITE, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

A jury convicted defendant of assault in the second degree. Defendant was sentenced to six months in the county jail and fined $1,000. Defendant appeals the judgment entered on this conviction. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion in this case. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Zonagen, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year
ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Louis Ploth, Jr., Vice President, Business Development and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: March 30, 2005 /s/ Louis Ploth, Jr.Louis Ploth, Jr.Vice President, Business Development and Chief
Financial Officer
Zonagen, Inc.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 71 (Thursday, April 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18879-18880]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9054]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of Thrift Supervision
[AC-20; OTS No. 6033]


Neosho Savings and Loan Association, F.A., Neosho, Missouri; 
Approval of Conversion Application

    Notice is hereby given that on April 5, 1995, the Assistant 
Director, Corporate Activities, Office of Thrift Supervision, or her 
designee, acting pursuant to delegated authority, 

[[Page 18880]]
approved the application of Neosho Savings and Loan Association, F.A., 
Neosho, Missouri, to convert to the stock form of organization. Copies 
of the application are available for inspection at the Information 
Services Division, Office of Thrift Supervision, 1700 G Street, N.W., 
Washington, D.C. 20552, and the Midwest Regional Office, Office of 
Thrift Supervision, 122 West John Carpenter Freeway, Suite 600, Irving, 
Texas 75261-9027.

    Dated: April 7, 1995.

    By the Office of Thrift Supervision,
Nadine Y. Washington,
Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-9054 Filed 4-12-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-M
#### Douglas DeBlase et al., Appellants, v Herbert Construction Company, Inc., Respondent. (And a Third-Party Action.)

[774 NYS2d 777]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Dunn, J.), dated March 6, 2003, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the causes of action alleging violations of Labor Law § 200 and common-law negligence.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Labor Law § 200 codified the common-law duty of an owner or employer to provide employees with a safe place to work *(see Jock v Fien,*80 NY2d 965, 967 [1992]; *Yong Ju Kim v Herbert Constr. Co.,*275 AD2d 709 [2000]). The statute applies to owners and contractors who exercise control or supervision over the work being performed, or who have either created a dangerous condition or had actual or constructive notice of such condition *(see Lombardi v Stout,*80 NY2d 290, 294-295 [1992]; *Fenton v Monotype Sys.,*289 AD2d 194 [2001]; *Yong Ju Kim v Herbert Constr. Co., supra).*Here, the defendant general contractor made a prima facie showing of entitlement to summary judgment dismissing the causes of action alleging violations of Labor Law § 200 and common-law negligence by demonstrating that it did not exercise supervisory control over the injured plaintiff’s work, and that it neither created nor had actual or constructive knowledge of the allegedly dangerous condition *(see Fenton v Monotype Sys., supra; Yong Ju Kim v Herbert Constr. Co., supra).*In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to come forward with evidence to support their claim, inter alia, that the allegedly dangerous condition was created by the defendant’s employees. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the causes of action alleging violations of Labor Law § 200 and common-law negligence.

The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J.P., Krausman, Luciano and Townes, JJ., concur.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-6910

National Electrical Manufacturers Association:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

“Made in China 2025” or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
**Exhibit**
**32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

| 1.     | the                Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30,                2007 (the “Form 10-QSB”) fully complies with the requirements of                Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as                amended;                and |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
| 2.     | the                information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all                material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form                10-QSB                    |

| Dated:                August 10, 2007  | /s/                Chester P. Aldridge                 |
|---------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                        | Chester                P. Aldridge                     |
|                                        | Chief                Executive                Officer  |
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5726

A.W. Chesterton Company:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6862

Hartland Controls, LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_5-30-2019.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel