alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 3.1(d)
                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                             OBJECTSOFT CORPORATION


                  It is hereby certified that:

                  1.  The  name  of  the  corporation  (hereinafter  called  the
"Corporation") is ObjectSoft Corporation.

                  2.  The  Certificate  of   Incorporation  of  the  Corporation
(hereinafter  called  the  "Certificate  of  Incorporation")  is hereby  further
amended by  deleting  the  current  first  paragraph  of the Fourth  Article and
replacing it with the following:

                  "FOURTH:  The  aggregate  number of shares of stock  which the
Corporation  shall have authority to issue is 55,000,000 shares divided into two
classes;  50,000,000 shares of which shall be designated as Common Stock, $.0001
par value per  share,  and  5,000,000  shares of which  shall be  designated  as
Preferred Stock,  with $.0001 par value per share.  There shall be no preemptive
rights with respect to any shares of capital stock of the Corporation.

                  Effective  12:01 a.m.  on  October  13,  1999 (the  "Effective
Time"),  each six shares of Common  Stock  then  issued  shall be  automatically
combined into one share of Common Stock of the Corporation. Each of the "Closing
Price" as defined in the  Certificate  of  Designation  of Series E  Convertible
Preferred  Stock,  as  amended,  and  the  "Maximum  Price"  as  defined  in the
Certificate  of  Designation  of Series F Convertible  Preferred  Stock shall be
automatically  increased  to a dollar  amount  which is six times  the  previous
amount. No fractional shares or scrip representing fractions of a share shall be
issued, but in lieu thereof, each fraction of a share that any stockholder would
otherwise  be  entitled  to receive  shall be rounded  up to the  nearest  whole
share."

                  3. The amendment of the  Certificate of  Incorporation  herein
certified has been duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242
of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

Dated: October 12, 1999

                                        /s/ David E.Y. Sarna
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        David E.Y. Sarna, Chairman and Secretary
---

---

Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report
of Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period
ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Amiram Levinberg, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The
information contained in the Report           fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of           operations of the Company.

/s/ Amiram LevinbergAmiram Levinberg
Chief Executive Officer
April 9, 2008



---

---
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1


               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Aethlon Medical, Inc. on Form
10-KSB for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, James A. Joyce, Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         1. Based on my knowledge, the Annual Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and

         2. The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of Aethlon Medical, Inc.

Date: July 15, 2008

By: /s/ James A. Joyce
    -----------------------
    James A. Joyce
    Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Aethlon Medical, Inc. and will be
retained by Aethlon Medical, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
| (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              |
|------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|             |                                                                                                                                               |
| (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust. |

| /s/ Jeffrey H. Strasberg |                                                          |
|--------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
| Name:                    | Jeffrey H. Strasberg                                          |   |
| Title:         | Chief Executive and Financial Officer                    |   |
|                     | (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) |   |
|                     |                                                          |   |
| Date:               | April 29, 2011                                                |   |

----
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-76,972

EX PARTE JUNIUS SEREAL, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 08CR2114 IN THE 405 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM GALVESTON COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

The Court substitutes this opinion for the earlier opinion issued on February 27, 2013.

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of a

controlled substance and sentenced to thirty-two years’ imprisonment. The Fourteenth Court of

Appeals affirmed his conviction. Sereal v. State, No. 14-10-00594-CR (Tex. App.–Houston [14 ]

th

May 10, 2011). 

Applicant contends that his due process rights were violated because a forensic scientist did

not follow accepted standards when analyzing evidence and therefore the results of his analyses are
2

unreliable. The State and the trial court agreed that relief was warranted before remand, but the

record was insufficient to decide the case at that time. This Court remanded the application to obtain

more information. Specifically, the Court needed three additional pieces of information to resolve

this case: (1) a copy of the Department of Public Safety (DPS) report Applicant was relying on for

his claim; (2) a determination that the lab technician named in that report was the only scientist that

worked on this sample; and (3) a finding as to whether the sample was destroyed or could be

retested. The trial court has now provided this Court with all the information necessary to resolve

this case on the merits. The DPS report shows that the lab technician who was solely responsible

for testing the evidence in this case is the scientist found to have committed misconduct . While there

is evidence remaining that is available to retest in this case, that evidence was in the custody of the

lab technician in question. This Court believes his actions are not reliable therefore custody was

compromised, resulting in a due process violation. Applicant is therefore entitled to relief. 

Relief is granted. The judgment in Cause No. 08CR2114 in the 405 District Court of th

Galveston County is set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Galveston

County. The trial court shall issue any necessary bench warrant within 10 days after the mandate of

this Court issues.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: March 6, 2013

Do Not Publish
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4792

Arrowhead Electrical Products, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
Exhibit 13.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Magal Security Systems Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ilan Ovadia, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Ilan Ovadia*


Ilan Ovadia


Senior Vice President – Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary





May 2, 2010





*           The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the Company’s offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132760 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

KYLE and LISA CAMARDA, JAMES and Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, JANICE FRY, TODD and DIANE PELTIER, Justices DONNAMARIE RUGGIANO, JANICE 

SCHWARTZ, and ELIZABETH 

VANDEVENTER,

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

v SC: 132760 

 COA: 269046 
 Eaton CC: 05-000223-NZ 

CITY OF EATON RAPIDS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 7, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should now be reviewed by this Court. 

t0830 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 10, 2007 

 Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 66 (Thursday, April 6, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 17538]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8515]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
[Docket No. 93F-0201]


Asahi Denka Kogyo K. K.; Withdrawal of Food Additive Petition

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the 
withdrawal, without prejudice to a future filing, of a food additive 
petition (FAP 3B4378) proposing that the food additive regulations be 
amended to provide for the safe use of sodium 2,2'-methylenebis(4,6-di-
tert-butylphenyl) phosphate as a clarifying agent in polypropylene 
articles intended for contact with food to include the use at 
temperatures up to and including retort conditions.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Helen R. Thorsheim, Center for Food 
Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-216), Food and Drug Administration, 
200 C St. SW., Washington, DC 20204, 202-418-3092.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a notice published in the Federal 
Register of July 29, 1993 (58 FR 40656), FDA announced that a food 
additive petition (FAP 3B4378) had been filed by Asahi Denka Kogyo K. 
K., c/o Japan Technical Information Center, Inc., 1002 Pennsylvania 
Ave. SE., Washington, DC 20003. The petition proposed to amend the food 
additive regulations in Sec. 178.3295 Clarifying agents for polymers 
(21 CFR 178.3295) to provide for the safe use of sodium 2,2'-
methylenebis(4,6-di-tert-butylphenyl) phosphate as a clarifying agent 
in polypropylene articles
intended for contact with food to include the use at temperatures up to 
and including retort conditions. Asahi Denka Kogyo K. K. has now 
withdrawn the petition without prejudice to a future filing (21 CFR 
171.7)

    Dated: March 22, 1995.
Eugene C. Coleman,
Acting Director, Office of Premarket Approval, Center for Food Safety 
and Applied Nutrition.
[FR Doc. 95-8515 Filed 4-5-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION BY THE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Visant Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 2, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Marc L. Reisch, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |  |  |                              
|------------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------------
|                   |  | 
|Date: May 17, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/ Marc L. Reisch           
|                   |  |  |  | Marc L. Reisch               
|                   |  |  |  | President and                
|                   |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|                   |  |  |  | (principal executive officer)
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Francisco Gutierrez Cruz, Jr., Appellant

No. 06-17-00136-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 124th District Court of 

Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 45,565-

B). Opinion delivered by Chief Justice 

Morriss, Justice Moseley and Justice 

Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Francisco Gutierrez Cruz, Jr., has adequately indicated his 

inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED MARCH 1, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5594

MAHLE Behr USA, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4689

II-VI Incorporated:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

“Made in China 2025” or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5089

A.W. Chesterton Company:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
exv10w3






Exhibit 10.3




AMENDMENT NO. 3

TO THE NACCO MATERIALS HANDLING GROUP, INC.

LONG-TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

FOR THE PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1, 2000 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2007

(As Amended and Restated as of December 31, 2007)




     NACCO Materials Handling Group, Inc. hereby adopts this Amendment No. 3 to the NACCO Materials
Handling Group, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan For the Period from January 1, 2000
through December 31, 2007 (As Amended and Restated as of December 31, 2007) (the “Plan”), to be
effective as of February 10, 2010. Words used herein with initial capital letters which are
defined in the Plan are used herein as so defined.



Section 1



     Section 13 of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following new Subsection (d) to the end
thereof, to read as follows:



     “(d) Notwithstanding the foregoing, or any other provision of the Plan to the contrary, NACCO
Industries, Inc. shall be responsible for the payment of the amounts credited to the 2007
Sub-Accounts of all Participants other than Non-U.S. Participants (including interest) that are due
to be paid during the period from January 1, 2010 and March 30, 2010. In furtherance thereof, but
without limiting the foregoing, NACCO Industries, Inc. shall not be responsible for the payment of
any other amount under the Plan.”


EXECUTED this 9th day of February, 2010.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	NACCO MATERIALS HANDLING GROUP, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Charles A. Bittenbender
 	 
	 	 	Charles A. Bittenbender 	 
	 	 	Title:  	 Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary  	 
	 


NACCO Industries, Inc. agrees to the terms of this Amendment No. 3.



EXECUTED this 9th day of February, 2010.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	NACCO INDUSTRIES, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Charles A. Bittenbender
 	 
	 	 	Charles A. Bittenbender 	 
	 	 	Title:  	 Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary  	 



1