Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 64 / Tuesday, April 4, 1995 / Rules and Regulations 16985

[FR Doc. 95–8224 Filed 4–3–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND

URBAN DEVELOPMENT

Office of the Assistant Secretary for

Housing—Federal Housing

Commissioner

24 CFR Part 3500

[Docket No. R–95–1688; FR–3255–N–07]

Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act

(Regulation X); Escrow Accounting

Procedures: Announcement of

Availability of Software To Calculate

Aggregate Accounting Adjustment

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant

Secretary for Housing-Federal Housing

Commissioner, HUD.

ACTION: Notice of availability of

software.

SUMMARY: On October 26, 1994, HUD

published a final rule establishing

escrow accounting procedures under the

Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act.

In the October 26 final rule the

Department indicated that it would

make available computer software that

could be used in calculating the

numerical value of the aggregate

accounting adjustment for a last line in

the 1000 series of the HUD–1 and HUD–

1A. This notice describes the

availability of this software on Internet

or by requesting a diskette by mail or

telephone.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

William Reid, Research Economist,

Office of Policy Development and

Research, Room 8212, Department of

Housing and Urban Development, 451

Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC

20410; telephone (202) 708–0421 or

(202) 708–0770 (TDD).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On

October 26, 1994 (59 FR 53890), the

Department published a final rule

establishing escrow accounting

procedures under Sections 6(g) and 10

of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures

Act, 12 U.S.C. 2605(g) and 2609

(RESPA). This final rule was corrected

on December 19, 1994 (59 FR 65442),

and augmented on February 15, 1995

(60 FR 8811; correction published

March 1, 1995, 60 FR 11194) by a

further final rule that included

commentaries, corrections, and

illustrations. The February 15, 1995,

rule also established an effective date of

May 24, 1995, for both the October 26

and February 15 rules.

In the October final rule, at page

53895, the Department said it would

make available software that could be

used in calculating the numerical value

of the aggregate accounting adjustment

for a last line in the 1000 series of the

HUD–1 and HUD–1A. The software is

available at no charge over Internet by

accessing the ‘‘HUD Gopher’’ (see

instructions below). Alternatively, a

diskette containing the two files

included on the Internet may be

obtained by sending a request, with a

check payable to HUD USER for $15 for

each diskette ordered, to: HUD USER,

P.O. Box 6091, Rockville, MD 20850.

HUD USER also may be reached by

telephone at 1–800–245–2691 to answer

inquiries about this software or to order

diskettes when the cost of the diskettes

is being charged to a VISA or

MasterCard account. All inquiries,

whether by mail or telephone, should

reference ‘‘Notice FR–3255, Escrow

Accounting Software.’’

Access via Internet

To access the software using the HUD

Gopher, follow these procedures:

• Access the Internet;

• Select the Gopher option from the

Internet utilities menu;

• Type the address:

‘‘huduser.aspensys.com 73’’ (depending

on the user’s Gopher convention, the

selection of port 73 may be signaled by

typing a different character (such as an

underline, colon, or backslash) instead

of the space);

• At the main menu of options, select

‘‘Policy Development and Research

Publications’’;

• Then select ‘‘Homeownership’’; and

• Select the two Lotus 1–2–3 format

files: ‘‘biweekly mortgage aggregate

adjustment’’ and ‘‘monthly mortgage

aggregate adjustment’’.

Dated: March 27, 1995.

Nicolas P. Retsinas,

Assistant Secretary for Housing—Federal

Housing Commissioner.

[FR Doc. 95–8148 Filed 4–3–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210–27–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of Surface Mining Reclamation

and Enforcement

30 CFR Part 914

[IN–111–FOR; Amendment 94–1]

Indiana Regulatory Program

AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining

Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM),

Interior.

ACTION: Final rule; approval of

amendment.

SUMMARY: OSM is approving, with

exceptions, a proposed amendment to

the Indiana permanent regulatory

program (hereinafter referred to as the

Indiana program) under the Surface

Mining Control and Reclamation Act of

1977 (SMCRA). The amendment

consists of revisions to Indiana’s Surface

Coal Mining and Reclamation Statutes

concerning bond forfeiture procedures,

underground mine subsidence control,

permit revocation procedures,

administrative orders and procedures,

and conflict of interest. The amendment

is intended to revise the Indiana Code

(IC) to implement statutory changes.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 4, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Roger W. Calhoun, Director,

Indianapolis Field Office, Office of

Surface Mining Reclamation and

Enforcement, Minton-Capehart Federal

Building, 575 North Pennsylvania

Street, Room 301, Indianapolis, IN

46204, Telephone (317) 226–6166.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background on the Indiana Program.

II. Submission of the Amendment.

III. Director’s Findings.

IV. Summary and Disposition of Comments.

V. Director’s Decision.

VI. Procedural Determinations.

I. Background on the Indiana Program

On July 29, 1982, the Indiana program

was made effective by the conditional

approval of the Secretary of the Interior.

Information pertinent to the general

background on the Indiana program,

including the Secretary’s findings, the

disposition of comments, and a detailed

explanation of the conditions of

approval of the Indiana program can be

found in the July 26, 1982 Federal

Register (47 FR 32107). Subsequent

actions concerning the conditions of

approval and program amendments are

identified at 30 CFR 914.10, 914.15, and

914.16.

II. Submission of the Amendment

By letter dated March 21, 1994

(Administrative Record Number IND–

1341), the Indiana Department of

Natural Resources (IDNR) submitted a

proposed amendment consisting of

three sets of changes to the Indiana

program. The first set of changes involve

statutes enacted by Indiana under SEA

408 from the 1994 Indiana Legislative

Session. The amendments concern bond

forfeiture procedures, underground

mine subsidence control, and permit

revocation procedures. The second set

of amendments are contained in SEA

319 (Pub. L. 7–1987). These

amendments primarily concern the

substitution of the citation of the then-
16986 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 64 / Tuesday, April 4, 1995 / Rules and Regulations

repealed IC 4–22–1 with IC 4–21.5

concerning administrative orders and

procedures. The third amendment is

contained in HEA 1516 (Pub. L. 13–

1987). This amendment changes the

Indiana conflict of interest provisions.

OSM announced receipt of the proposed

amendment in the April 18, 1994,

Federal Register (59 FR 18330), and, in

the same notice, opened the public

comment period and provided

opportunity for a public hearing on the

adequacy of the proposed amendment.

The comment period closed on May 18,

1994.

III. Director’s Findings

Set forth below, pursuant to SMCRA

and the Federal regulations at 30 CFR

732.15 and 732.17, are the Director’s

findings concerning the proposed

amendment to the Indiana program.

Revisions which are not discussed

below concern nonsubstantive wording

changes, or revise paragraph notations

to reflect organizational changes

resulting from this amendment.

1. IC 13–4.1–6–9 Forfeiture of Bond

Indiana is adding new subsection 9(b)

to provide that an order issued under IC

13–4.1–6–9(a) is governed by IC 4–21.5–

3–6 and becomes an effective and final

order without a proceeding if a request

for review of the order is not filed

within 15 days after the order is served

upon: (1) the permittee; and (2) the

person that executed the permittee’s

bond or other performance guarantee, if

the permittee filed a bond or other

performance guarantee under IC 13–4.1–

1.

The Director finds the proposed

language is substantively identical to

and no less effective than the Federal

regulations at 30 CFR 800.50(b)(1)

concerning forfeiture of bond.

2. IC 13–4.1–9–2.5 Subsidence—Repair

or Compensation

This new section is added as a

counterpart to SMCRA section 720

which was added by the Energy Policy

Act of 1992 (Pub. L. 102–486 [H.R. 776];

October 24, 1992). Subsection 2.5(a)

provides that as used in subsection

2.5(d)(1), ‘‘repair’’ includes

rehabilitation, restoration, or

replacement. This proposed language is

substantively identical to SMCRA

subsection 720(a)(1) which provides

that repair of damage shall include

rehabilitation, restoration, or

replacement.

New subsection 2.5(b) provides that

as used in subsection 2.5(d)(1),

‘‘compensate’’ means to provide

compensation in an amount equal to the

full amount of the diminution of value

resulting from the subsidence referred to

in subsection 2.5(d)(1). This proposed

language is substantively identical to

SMCRA subsection 720(a)(1) which

provides that compensation shall be

provided in the full amount of the

diminution in value resulting from the

subsidence.

New subsection 2.5(c) provides that

for the purposes of subsection 2.5(d)(1),

compensation may be accomplished

through the purchase, before the

commencement of mining operations, of

a noncancellable premium-prepaid

insurance policy. This proposed

language is substantively identical to

SMCRA section 720(a)(1) which

provides that compensation may be

accomplished by the purchase, prior to

mining, of a noncancellable premiumprepaid insurance policy.

New subsection 2.5(d) provides that

the operator of an underground coal

mining operation conducted after June

30, 1994, shall do the following: (1)

Promptly repair or compensate for

material damage resulting from

subsidence caused to: (A) any occupied

residential dwelling and any structure

related to the occupied residential

dwelling; or (B) any noncommercial

building; due to the operator’s

underground coal mining operation. (2)

Promptly replace any drinking,

domestic, or residential water supply

from a well or spring that: (A) was in

existence before the filing of the

operator’s application for a surface coal

mining and reclamation permit; and (B)

has been affected by contamination,

diminution, or interruption resulting

from the operator’s underground coal

mining operation. This proposed

language is substantively identical to

SMCRA section 720(a), except that the

Indiana provision applies only to

underground coal mining operations

which occur after June 30, 1994.

SMCRA section 720(a) provides that

underground coal mining operations

conducted after the date of enactment of

new section 720 (October 24, 1992) shall

comply with the requirements of section

720. Therefore, to the extent that the

proposed amendment meets the

requirements of SMCRA section 720(a)

from June 30, 1994, the Director finds

that IC 13–4.1–9–2.5 is no less stringent

than SMCRA section 720(a).

The Director is deferring decision on

the enforcement of the provisions of

SMCRA section 720(a) during the period

from the effective date of SMCRA

section 720 (October 24, 1992) to the

effective date of IC 13–4.1–9–2.5 (June

30, 1994). The Federal subsidence

regulations which will implement

SMCRA section 720(a) have been

finalized and will be published shortly.

Within 120 days after the publication of

the new Federal subsidence regulations,

OSM intends to published for each State

with a regulatory program, including

Indiana, final rule notices concerning

the enforcement of the provisions of the

Energy Policy Act in those States.

3. IC 13–4.1–11–6 Suspension or

Revocation of Permit

Indiana is amending subsection

6(a)(1)(B) by deleting the term

‘‘commission’’ and adding the words

‘‘adopted under IC 13–4.1–2–1.’’

Indiana is also relating the words ‘‘the

violations.’’ As amended, IC 13–4.1–11–

6(a)(1)(B) reads as follows: ‘‘the rules

adopted under IC 13–4.1–2–1.’’ Since IC

13–4.1–2–1 is the provision which

establishes the authority for the Indiana

Natural Resources Commission (the

commission) to adopt rules, the change

does not render the provision less

effective. A similar amendment at

subsection 6(a)(2)(A)(ii) also does not

render the provision less effective.

Indiana is adding the words ‘‘permit

conditions’’ at subsection 6(a)(2)(A)(iii)

to provide a counterpart to SMCRA

section 521(a)(4).

Subsection 6(a) is amended to provide

that if the director of the IDNR

determines that the criteria at

subsections 6(a) (1) and (2) apply, the

director shall issue an order of permit

suspension or revocation and provide

an opportunity for a public hearing. The

provision formerly provided for an

order ‘‘to the permittee to show cause

why the permit should not be

suspended or revoked.’’ The

amendment does not render the

provision less stringent than SMCRA

section 521(a)(4) because section 6 in its

entirety still provides for a hearing at

which the permittee could show cause

why the permit should not be

suspended or revoked.

Subsection 6(b) is amended by

relocating the existing language to new

subsection 6(e). New language is added

to subsection 6(b) to provide that an

order issued under the pattern of

violations criteria at subsection 6(a) is

governed by IC 4–21.5–3–6 concerning

required notice, and becomes an

effective and final order of the

commission without a proceeding if a

request for review of the order is not

filed within 30 days after the order is

served upon the permittee. The Director

finds the revision to be no less stringent

than SMCRA at section 521(a)(4).

Subsection 6(c) is amended by

replacing a citation of ‘‘IC 4–21.5–3’’

with ‘‘IC 4–21.5.’’ This change

appropriately expands the citation to

the entire Indiana administrative orders

and procedures at IC 4–21.5. A block of
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 64 / Tuesday, April 4, 1995 / Rules and Regulations 16987

language concerning a written decision

following the hearing is deleted from

subsection 6(c) and added to new

subsection 6(g).

New subsection 6(d) is added to

provide that in a hearing requested

under IC 4–21.5–3–7, the director of the

IDNR has the burden of going forward

with evidence demonstrating that the

permit in question should be suspended

or revoked. The burden shall be

satisfied if the director establishes a

prima facie case that the criteria of

subsection 6(a) have been met. This

proposed language is consistent with

and no less stringent than SMCRA at

section 521(a)(4).

The language in new subsection (e) is

relocated from subsection 6(b).

New subsection 6(f) provides that if

the director of the IDNR determines in

a hearing requested under IC 4–21.5–3–

7 that the permit in question should be

suspended or revoked, the permittee has

the ultimate burden of persuasion to

show cause why the permit should not

be suspended or revoked. A permittee

may not challenge the fact of any

violation that is the subject of a final

order of the director of the IDNR. The

Director finds that the proposed

language is substantively identical to

and no less stringent than SMCRA at

section 521(a)(4).

New subsection 6(g) contains

language deleted from subsection 6(c)

and concerns the 60-day requirement to

issue a final written decision following

a hearing. The Director finds the

proposed language is not inconsistent

with SMCRA at section 521(a)(4) and is

substantively identical to and no less

effective than 30 CFR 843.13(c).

Based on the discussion above, the

Director is approving the amendment to

IC 13–4.1–11–6.

4. IC 13–4.1–2–4 Petition Procedures

for Rules

This section is amended in two

locations by deleting reference to IC 4–

22–1 and adding in its place a reference

to IC 4–21.5 concerning administrative

orders and procedures. IC 4–21.5 is

Indiana’s current statute controlling

administrative orders and procedures

and replaces the repealed IC 4–22–1.

The Director finds the change does not

render the Indiana program less

effective.

Indiana is making similar citation

changes in several provisions. Most of

these changes involve replacing

reference to the repealed IC 4–22–1 with

IC 4–21.5 concerning administrative

orders and procedures. At IC 13–4.1–4–

3 Indiana is deleting reference to IC 14–

4–2 which was repealed by Indiana in

1986 by Pub. L 115–1986, at section 22.

The following provisions contain

citation changes which do not render

the Indiana program less stringent than

SMCRA:

IC 13–4.1–2–4; IC 13–4.1–4–3; IC 13–

4.1–4–5; IC 13–4.1–6–7; IC 13–4.1–

11–6; IC 13–4.1–11–8; IC 13–4.1–

11–12; IC 13–4.1–12–1; IC 12–4.1–

13–1; and IC 13–4.1–15–9.

5. IC 13–4.1–2–3 Conflict of Interest

This provision is amended to provide

that an employee of the IDNR who has

any duty under IC 13–4.1 may not have

a direct or indirect financial interest in

any surface coal mining operation. A

member of the commission who has

such an interest shall file annually with

the State Board of Accounts. Any person

who knowingly violates this provision

commits a Class A misdemeanor.

Upon review of this provision, the

Director has determined that this

version of IC 13–4.1–2–3 predates and is

superseded by the version which was

the subject of a finding by the Director

published in the Federal Register on

December 15, 1989 (54 FR 51388). In

that finding, the Director determined

that IC 13–4.1–2–3 is not consistent

with SMCRA at 517(g) and the Federal

rules at 30 CFR part 705 and did not

approve the amendments (see Finding 1,

pages 51388 and 51389 of the December

15, 1989, Federal Register). In addition,

the Director required at 30 CFR

914.16(b) that Indiana amend IC 13–4.1–

2–3 or otherwise amend the Indiana

program to be consistent with SMCRA

at 517(g) and the Federal regulations at

30 CFR part 705 concerning employees

of the regulatory authority who have a

function or duty under SMCRA. That

requirement still stands. Therefore, the

Director is not acting on this earlier,

superseded version of IC 13–4.1–2–3.

IV. Summary and Disposition of

Comments

Federal Agency Comments

Pursuant to section 503(b) of SMCRA

and 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(i), comments

were solicited from various interested

Federal agencies. No agency comments

were received concerning the proposed

amendments to the Indiana program.

Public Comments

The public comment period and

opportunity to request a public hearing

was announced in the April 18, 1994,

Federal Register (59 FR 18330). The

comment period closed on May 18,

1994. No one requested an opportunity

to testify at the scheduled public

hearing so no hearing was held.

Mr. Rabb Emison, an attorney,

submitted a comment on behalf of five

operators of publicly regulated pipelines

in Indiana which carry petroleum

products and natural gas. The following

comments were made.

The commenters welcomed the

proposed language concerning

subsidence but stated that the

amendment is not complete.

Specifically, the comment stated that

the proposed language specifies certain

surface structures for protection, but

may be interpreted to deny equal

protection to commercial structures

such as pipelines. This, they asserted,

would seem to limit the protection

Congress intended in section 516(b)(1)

of SMCRA.

The comment stressed that protection

of pipelines from unplanned subsidence

is needed to prevent rupture of the

pipelines and potential damage to

property and the environment and loss

of life. Protection should be given to

surface structures equally, they stated.

In response, the Director notes that

the proposed language is substantively

identical to the counterpart language in

SMCRA at section 720. The language of

section 720(a) of SMCRA provides for

the repair or compensation for material

damage resulting from subsidence

caused to any occupied residential

dwelling and structures related thereto,

or noncommercial building due to

underground coal mining operations.

In response to SMCRA section 720(b),

OSM published proposed rules

intended to implement SMCRA section

720(a) (58 FR 50174; September 24,

1993). In that notice, OSM specifically

solicited comments on whether a need

exists for nationwide rules that go

beyond those required by SMCRA

section 720(a). Comments received in

response to that proposed rule are being

reviewed.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

Under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(ii), the

Director is required to obtain the written

concurrence of the Administrator of the

EPA with respect to any provisions of a

State program amendment that relate to

air or water quality standards

promulgated under the authority of the

Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.)

or the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et

seq.). The Director has determined that

this amendment contains no provisions

in these categories and that EPA’s

concurrence is not required.

Pursuant to 732.17(h)(11)(i), OSM

solicited comments on the proposed

amendment from EPA (Administrative

Record Number IND–1221). By letter

dated June 21, 1994 (Administrative

Record Number IND–1372), EPA

concurred without comment.
16988 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 64 / Tuesday, April 4, 1995 / Rules and Regulations

V. Director’s Decision

Based on the findings above, and

except as noted below, the Director is

approving the program amendment

submitted by Indiana on March 21,

1994. As discussed in Finding 2, the

Director is approving IC 13–4.1–9–2.5 to

the extent that the proposed amendment

meets the requirements of SMCRA

section 720(a) from June 30, 1994. In

addition, the Director is deferring

decision on the enforcement of the

provisions of SMCRA section 720(a)

during the period from the effective date

of SMCRA section 720 (October 24,

1992) to the effective date of IC 13–4.1–

9–2.5 (June 30, 1994). As discussed

above in Finding 5, the Director is not

acting on IC 13–4.1–2–3.

The Federal regulations at 30 CFR

Part 914 codifying decisions concerning

the Indiana program are being amended

to implement this decision. This final

rule is being made effective immediately

to expedite the State program

amendment process and to encourage

States to bring their programs into

conformity with the Federal standards

without undue delay. Consistency of

State and Federal standards is required

by SMCRA.

Effect of Director’s Decision

Section 503 of SMCRA provides that

a State may not exercise jurisdiction

under SMCRA unless the State program

is approved by the Secretary. Similarly,

30 CFR 732.17(a) requires that any

alteration of an approved State program

be submitted to OSM for review as a

program amendment. Thus, any changes

to the State program are not enforceable

until approved by OSM. The Federal

regulations at 30 CFR 732.17(g) prohibit

any unilateral changes to approved State

programs. In his oversight of the Indiana

program, the Director will recognize

only the statutes, regulations and other

materials approved by him, together

with any consistent implementing

policies, directives and other materials,

and will require the enforcement by

Indiana of only such provisions.

VI. Procedural Determinations

Executive Order 12866

This rule is exempted from review by

the Office of Management and Budget

(OMB) under Executive Order 12866

(Regulatory Planning and Review).

Executive Order 12778

The Department of the Interior has

conducted the reviews required by

section 2 of Executive Order 12778

(Civil Justice Reform) and has

determined that, to the extent allowed

by law, this rule meets the applicable

standards of subsections (a) and (b) of

that section. However, these standards

are not applicable to the actual language

of State regulatory programs and

program amendments since each such

program is drafted and promulgated by

a specific State, not by OSM. Under

sections 503 and 505 of SMCRA (30

U.S.C. 1253 and 1255) and 30 CFR

730.11, 732.15 and 732.17(h)(10),

decisions on proposed State regulatory

programs and program amendments

submitted by the States must be based

solely on a determination of whether the

submittal is consistent with SMCRA and

its implementing Federal regulations

and whether the other requirements of

30 CFR Parts 730, 731, and 732 have

been met.

National Environmental Policy Act

No environmental impact statement is

required for this rule since section

702(d) of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1292(d))

provides that agency decisions on

proposed State regulatory program

provisions do not constitute major

Federal actions within the meaning of

section 102(2)(C) of the National

Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.

4332(2)(C)).

Paperwork Reduction Act

This rule does not contain

information collection requirements that

require approval by OMB under the

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.

3507 et seq.).

Regulatory Flexibility Act

The Department of the Interior has

determined that this rule will not have

a significant economic impact on a

substantial number of small entities

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5

U.S.C. 601 et seq.). The State submittal

which is the subject of this rule is based

upon counterpart Federal regulations for

which an economic analysis was

prepared and certification made that

such regulations would not have a

significant economic effect upon a

substantial number of small entities.

Accordingly, this rule will ensure that

existing requirements previously

promulgated by OSM will be

implemented by the State. In making the

determination as to whether this rule

would have a significant economic

impact, the Department relied upon the

data and assumptions for the

counterpart Federal regulations.

List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 914

Intergovernmental relations, Surface

mining, Underground mining.

Dated: March 27, 1995.

Ronald C. Recker,

Acting Assistant Director, Eastern Support

Center.

For the reasons set out in the

preamble, Title 30, Chapter VII,

Subchapter T of the Code of Federal

Regulations is amended as set forth

below:

PART 914—INDIANA

1. The authority citation for Part 914

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.

2. In Section 914.15, paragraph (ggg)

is added to read as follows:

§ 914.15 Approval of regulatory program

amendments.

* * * * *

(ggg) The following amendment

(Program Amendment Number 94–1) to

the Indiana program as submitted to

OSM on April 18, 1994, is approved,

except as noted below, effective April 4,

1995:

IC 13–4.1–6–9 Forfeiture of bond

IC 13–4.1–9–2.5 Subsidence repair or

compensation, to the extent that the

proposed amendment meets the

requirements of SMCRA section

720(a) from June 30, 1994. The

Director is deferring decision on the

enforcement of the provisions of

SMCRA section 720(a) during the

period from the effective date of

SMCRA section 720 (October 24,

1992) to the effective date of IC 13–

4.1–9–2.5 (June 30, 1994).

IC 13–4.1–11–6 Suspension or

revocation of permits

IC 13–4.1–2–4 Petition procedures for

rules

IC 13–4.1–2–4 Rule petition

procedures

IC 13–4.1–4–3 Necessary permit

findings

IC 13–4.1–4–5 Hearing on permit

approval/disapproval

IC 13–4.1–6–7 Release of bond or

deposit

IC 13–4.1–11–6 Suspension or

revocation of permit

IC 13–4.1–11–8 Temporary relief

IC 13–4.1–11–12 Hearings;

intervention

IC 13–4.1–12–1 Civil penalties

IC 13–4.1–13–1 Review of action of the

director/commission

IC 13–4.1–15–9 Hearings; use or

disposition of acquired lands

The Director is not acting on IC 13–

4.1–2–3, Conflict of interest.

[FR Doc. 95–8115 Filed 4–3–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–05–M