alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Destination Maternity Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Edward M. Krell, Chief Executive Officer & President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                   
|-----------------------------------
|/s/ EDWARD M. KRELL                
|Edward M. Krell                    
|Chief Executive Officer & President
|December 14, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1999
<CASH>                                           3,024
<SECURITIES>                                     7,550
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,311
<ALLOWANCES>                                       154
<INVENTORY>                                      6,338
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,039
<PP&E>                                           8,336
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,398
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  35,823
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,425
<BONDS>                                            352
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           102
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,280
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    35,823
<SALES>                                         40,882
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                40,882
<CGS>                                           24,991
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,991
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    75
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 227
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,202
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,480
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,495
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,495
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .42


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5120 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5120

To strengthen the prohibition on the ownership or trading of stocks in 
  certain companies by certain officials of the Department of Defense.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 1, 2023

  Ms. Porter introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To strengthen the prohibition on the ownership or trading of stocks in 
  certain companies by certain officials of the Department of Defense.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Prohibit Pentagon Profiteering 
Act''.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF PROHIBITION ON OWNERSHIP OR TRADING OF STOCKS 
              IN CERTAIN COMPANIES BY CERTAIN OFFICIALS OF THE 
              DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.

    Section 988(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``if that company is one of the 10 entities awarded the most 
amount of contract funds by the Department of Defense in a fiscal year 
during the five preceding fiscal years'' and inserting ``if, during the 
preceding calendar year, the company received more than $1,000,000,000 
in revenue from the Department of Defense, including through one or 
more contracts with the Department''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report ofBulldog Financial, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A-1 for the period ended May 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Scott McDowell, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 24th day of July, 2006.



| | SCOTT MCDOWELL                                     
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Scott McDowell                                     
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer















---
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 65 (Wednesday, April 5, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17369-17370]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8244]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--ADBAC Joint Venture

    Notice is hereby given that, on January 27, 1995, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Huntington Laboratories, 
Inc. has filed written notification simultaneously with the Attorney 
General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in the 
membership of the parties to the ADBAC Joint Venture (``Joint 
Venture''). The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, The Ethyl 
Corporation spun-off its specialty chemicals group into a separate and 
independent publicly traded company know as Albermarle Corporation, 
Baton Rouge, LA. In addition, the ADBAC products of Mazer Chemical, a 
division of PPG, were acquired by Lonaz, Inc., Fair Lawn, NJ.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the Joint Venture. Membership in this group research 
project remains open, and ADBAC intend to file additional written 
[[Page 17370]] notification disclosing any changes in membership.
    On September 6, 1986, the Huntington Laboratories, filed its 
original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The 
Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register 
pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on October 7, 1986 [51 FR 35706].
    The last notification was filed with the Department on June 28, 
1993. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on August 16, 1993 [58 FR 43376].
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 95-8244 Filed 4-4-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 70 (Wednesday, April 12, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 18540]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8937]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food Safety and Inspection Service

9 CFR Part 327

[Docket No. 94-010F]


Imported Product: Withdrawal of Czechoslovakia; Addition of the 
Czech Republic to the List of Eligible Countries

AGENCY: Food Safety and Inspection Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice; affirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On February 24, 1995, the Food Safety and Inspection Service 
(FSIS) published a direct final rule titled Imported Product: 
Withdrawal of Czechoslovakia; Addition of the Czech Republic to the 
List of Eligible Countries. This direct final rule notified the public 
of FSIS' intention to amend the Federal meat inspection regulations by 
removing Czechoslovakia from the list of foreign countries eligible to 
import meat products to the United States, and adding the Czech 
Republic in its place. No adverse comments were received in response to 
the direct final rule. Therefore, this rule is effective on April 25, 
1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Paula M. Cohen, Director, 
Regulations Development, Policy, Evaluation and Planning Staff, Food 
Safety and Inspection Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 
Washington, DC 20250-3700; (202) 720-7164.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice affirms the effective date of 
the direct final rule titled Imported Product: Withdrawal of 
Czechoslovakia; Addition of the Czech Republic to the List of Eligible 
Countries that was published on February 24, 1995, at 60 FR 10305. This 
direct final rule notified the public of FSIS' intention to amend the 
Federal meat inspection regulations by removing Czechoslovakia from the 
list of foreign countries eligible to import meat products to the 
United States, and adding the Czech Republic in its place. We did not 
receive any written adverse comments or written notice of intent to 
submit adverse comments in response to this rule. Therefore, the 
effective date of the rule is April 25, 1995.

    Done at Washington, DC, on April 5, 1995.
Michael R. Taylor,
Acting Under Secretary for Food Safety.
[FR Doc. 95-8937 Filed 4-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-DM-P
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4729

Arrowhead Electrical Products, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on a nd i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l y c onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2).

T h e H o n o r ab le R a lp h B . G u y , J r ., S e n io rC ir c u it J u d g e f o rth e S ix th ** * C i r c ui t , s i tt i ng by de s i gna t i on. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. J A SO N A LLEN SA N D S, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 11- 30050 D . C . N o. 9: 10 -c r- 00 02 0-D W M -1 ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe D i s tr i c tof

M ont a na D ona l d W . M ol l oy , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r8, 2011 ** S e a tt l e , W a s hi ngt on B e f o r e : GU Y, M cK E O W N , an d T A L L M A N , C i rcu i tJu d g es.

*** D ef endantappeal s f

rom hi s c on vi ct i on for a tt em p ti n g t o p er suade or ent i ce a pe r s on he be l i e ve d w a s a m i nort o e nga ge i n cri m i na l s e xua l a c t i vi ty i n vi ol a t i on of 

# FI LED DE C 13 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 30050 2 18 U . S . C . § 2422( b) . A l though de f e nda ntf r a m e s the i s s ue on appe a l a s w he the rthe de ni a l o f h i s mo t i o n f

o rj u d g me n to f

a c q u i tt a l v i o l a t e d th e D u e Pr o c e s s Cl a u s e , the i s s ue i s m or e c l e a r l y de f i ne d a s hi s c ont e nt i on tha t the gove rnm e nt f a i l e d t o pr ove the e l e m e nt s of

the c r i m e c ha r ge d. C ontr a ry t o de f

e nda nt ’ s a s sert i ons , s e xua l i nt e r c our s e w i th ac hi l d i s not r e qui r e d t o e s t abl i s h gui l tunde r § 2 4 2 2( b) , nori s the pr os e c ut i on r e qui r e d t o pr ove t h at an u nde r a ge c hi l d w a s a c tua l l y i nvol ve d i n the of f e ns e . U ni t e d S t a t e s v. M e e k, 3 6 6 F .3 d 7 0 5 , 7 1 8 - 1 9 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 4 ) . I t is irr e le v a n t th a t M o n t a n a h a s as p e c if ic o f f e n s e o f a tt e mp t i n g s e x u a l i n t e r c o u r s e w i th o u t c o n s e n t . U n d e r§ 2 4 2 2 ( b ) th e c r i me of a tt e m pti nvol ve s a n a tt e m ptt o s e c ur e the c ons e ntof the m i nort o enga ge i n the c r i m i na l a c t . U ni t e d S t a t e s v. H of us , 598 F . 3d 1171, 1179 ( 9th C i r . ) , c e r t . de ni e d, 131 S . C t . 36 4 (20 10 ). AF F I R ME D.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Keith Gettys, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 1.)

unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed and matter remitted to Supreme Court, Erie County, for further proceedings, in accordance with the following memorandum: Supreme Court erred when it directed defendant to pay $800 in restitution without first conducting a hearing on the amount of the restitution to be paid *(see,*Penal Law § 60.27 [2]; *People v Fuller,*57 NY2d 152; *People v Dixon,*134 AD2d 877). The People concede that this portion of the sentence must be vacated and the matter remitted for a restitution hearing. We otherwise find that defendant’s sentence was not unduly harsh and excessive.

There is no merit to defendant’s contention that the photographic array shown to each of the witnesses was unduly suggestive and tainted the witnesses’ in-court identification. Although some of the photographs in the array are of men with somewhat darker skin tone than that of defendant, after examining the photo arrays in question, we conclude that the witnesses’ attention was not drawn to a particular subject *(see, People v Davis,*148 AD2d 952, *Iv denied*74 NY2d 663; *People v Dubois,*140 AD2d 619, 622, *Iv denied*72 NY2d 911). Since defendant failed to object to the prosecutor’s comments on summation, this issue has not been preserved for our review *964
      *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Dawson,*50 NY2d 311, 324) and reversal is not warranted in the interest of justice. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Flynn, J.— robbery, second degree.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Green and Balio, JJ.
ex10-2.htm


Exhibit 10.2


 



TENTH AMENDMENT OF


AMENDED AND RESTATED PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT







This Tenth Amendment of the Amended and Restated Participation Agreement (the “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of this 19th day of October, 2009, by and between and Union Bank and Trust Company, a Nebraska banking corporation and trust company, solely in its capacity as trustee of various grantor trusts known as Short Term Federal Investment Trusts or other grantor trusts (“Union Bank”) and National Education Loan Network, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Nelnet”).







WHEREAS, the parties hereto entered into that certain Amended and Restated Participation Agreement dated as of June 1, 2001, as amended (the “Agreement”), and the parties hereto wish to amend the Agreement under the terms set forth herein.







NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and the mutual covenants herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows:







1.           Definitions.  Unless otherwise expressly stated herein, capitalized terms in this Amendment shall have the same meanings given to them in the Agreement.







2.           Change in Definition of Nelnet’s Fee.  For purposes of Section 1.03 of the Agreement, Nelnet’s Fee shall be defined to equal the difference between (i) the total of interest received with respect to such Eligible Loans contained in a participation certificate, and an amount equal to 50 basis points (0.50%) above the average of the bond equivalent rates of the quotes of 3-month commercial paper (financial) in effect for each of the days in such quarter as reported by the Federal Reserve in Publication H-15 (or its successor) for the relevant 3-month period, multiplied by the average aggregate principal balance of all Eligible Loans participated under the Agreement.  Payments shall be distributed on a monthly basis, on the first business day of each month.







3.           Effect of Amendment.  This Amendment shall be effective as of the date first set forth above. Unless expressly modified or amended by this Amendment, all terms and provision contained in the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect without modification.


 




	 
Union Bank and Trust Company  

	 	 	National Education Loan Network, Inc.	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	
By: /s/ Tom Sullivan

	 	 	
By: /s/ Jim Kruger

	 
	
Title: Vice President

	 	 	
Title: Assistant Secretary
EXHIBIT 12.1

                              STEEL HEDDLE MFG. CO.

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    FISCAL YEAR ENDED
                               -------------------------------------------------------------

                                     January 2, 1999
                               ---------------------------
                               (SUCCESSOR)    (PREDECESSOR)
                                 32 WEEKS       20 WEEKS
                                  ENDED           ENDED
                                 JANUARY 2,      MAY 25,
                                    1998          1998        1997     1996     1995     1994
                                ------------   ----------   -------  -------  -------  -------
<S>                                <C>             <C>     <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>
Earnings (losses) from
    continuing operations
    before income taxes            $ (8,782)      $5,209   $11,482  $ 4,237  $ 3,613  $ 3,836
Add:
   Net interest expense
       excluding capitalized
       interest                       9,053        1,499     5,154    5,849    6,330    7,098
   Amortization of debt
       expense                          265           50       130      105      105      105
                                    -------       ------   -------  -------  -------  -------
       Total earnings              $    536       $6,758   $16,766  $10,191  $10,048  $11,039
                                    =======       ======    ======   ======   ======  =======

Fixed charges:
  Net interest expense including
     capitalized interest          $  9,053       $1,499   $ 5,154  $ 5,849  $ 6,330  $ 7,098
   Amortization of debt expense         265           50       130      105      105      105
                                    =======       ======    ======   ======   ======  =======

     Total fixed charges           $  9,318       $1,549   $ 5,284  $ 5,954  $ 6,435  $ 7,203
                                    =======       ======    ======   ======   ======  =======

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges       --          4.4       3.2      1.7      1.6      1.5
                                    =======       ======    ======   ======   ======  =======
Deficiency in the coverage of fixed
      charges                      $(8,782)       $   --   $    --  $    --  $    --  $    --
                                    =======       ======    ======   ======   ======  =======
</TABLE>


For purposes of these computations, the ratio of earnings to fixed charges has
been calculated by dividing pretax earnings by fixed charges. Earnings, as used
to compute the ratio, equals the sum of income before income taxes and fixed
charges excluding capitalized interest. Fixed charges are the total interest
expenses including capitalized interest and amortization of debt expenses. The
interest factor on operating leases is insignificant.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 71 (Thursday, April 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 18846]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9040]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Public Health Service


Statement of Organization, Functions, and Delegations of 
Authority; Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health

    Part H, Public Health Service (PHS), Chapter HA (Office of the 
Assistant Secretary for Health), of the Statement of Organization, 
Functions, and Delegations of Authority for the Department of Health 
and Human Services (DHHS) (42 FR 61318, December 2, 1977, as amended 
most recently at 60 FR 8410, February 14, 1995) is amended to reflect a 
title change for the Office of Management, Office of the Assistant 
Secretary for Health.

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health

    Under Chapter HA, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, 
Section HA-10, Organization, change item.11. Office of Management (HAU) 
to 11. Office of Management and Budget (HAU).
    Under Section HA-20, Functions, following the title and statement 
for Office of Emergency Preparedness (HAP), change the title for Office 
of Management (HAU) to Office of Management and Budget (HAU).
    Under Chapter HA, Section HA-30, Delegations of Authority, add the 
following:
    Delegations of authority made to and by the Director, Office of 
Management will continue in the successor position Deputy Assistant 
Secretary for Health (Management and Budget) pending further 
redelegation.
    Delegations of authority made to and by the Deputy Assistant 
Secretary for Health Management Operations will continue in the 
successor position Deputy Assistant Secretary for Health (Management 
and Budget) pending further redelegation.

    Dated: March 28, 1995.
Philip R. Lee,
Assistant Secretary for Health.
[FR Doc. 95-9040 Filed 4-12-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-17-M