alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
10.12  CYMER, INC. 2005 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
2007 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE BONUS PLAN STOCK UNIT GRANT NOTICE  Cymer, Inc. (the Company),
pursuant to Section 7(c) of its 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (the Plan), and its 2007 Long-Term
Incentive Bonus Program (the 2007 LTIP), hereby awards to you as a
Participant under the Plan and the 2007 LTIP, a Stock Unit award for the number
of shares of the Companys Common Stock set forth below (the Award).  This Award is subject to all of the terms and
conditions as set forth herein and in (i) the applicable Stock Unit
Agreement, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein in its entirety, (ii) the
Plan, which is available on the Companys Intranet under the Human Resources
section and is incorporated herein in its entirety[, and (iii) the 2007
LTIP Summary Description, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein in
its entirety]..  Participant:Date of Grant:Number of Shares subject to Award:Consideration:
  Your Services to the Company  Vesting Schedule:The shares subject to this Award will vest
in accordance with the following schedule, provided that the vesting will cease upon the termination of
your active employment with the Company:  the shares will vest in three (3) equal
annual installments in each of January 2009, January 2010 and January 2011.  Issuance Schedule:Subject to the
terms of the Stock Unit Agreement, the shares subject to this Award will
generally be issued as they vest.  Additional Terms/Acknowledgements:You acknowledge
receipt of, and understand and agree to, this Stock Unit Grant Notice, the
Stock Unit Agreement, the Plan and the 2007 LTIP.  You also acknowledge receipt of the 2005
Equity Incentive Plan Prospectus; provided, however,
that if you are an Employee, you acknowledge that the 2005 Equity Incentive
Plan Prospectus is available for your review on the Companys Intranet under
the Human Resources section and that you also may receive a paper version of
the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan Prospectus upon your request.  You further acknowledge that as of the Date of
Grant, this Stock Unit Grant Notice, the Stock Unit Agreement, the Plan and the
2007 LTIP set forth the entire understanding between you and the Company
regarding the acquisition of stock in the Company pursuant to this Award and
supersede all prior oral and written agreements on that subject with the
exception of (i) Stock Awards (as defined in the Plan) previously granted
and delivered to you under the Plan, and (ii) the following agreements
only:  Other Agreements:


PARTICIPANT
  
  CYMER, INC.By:Signature
  
  
  SignatureName:
  
  
  Name:Print
  
  
  PrintDate:
  
  
  Title:Date:  ATTACHMENTS:  Stock
Unit Agreement, 2007 LTIP Summary Description


ATTACHMENT
I  STOCK
UNIT AGREEMENT


[ATTACHMENT
II  2007
LTIP SUMMARY DESCRIPTION]
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4027

Enerpac:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
#### In the Matter of Peter A. Lampone, a Suspended Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, Petitioner.

Second Department,

September 17,1990

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Frank A. Finnerty, Jr. (Nancy A. Bolger*of counsel), for petitioner.

*Ernest J. Peace*for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Peter A. Lampone has submitted an affidavit dated April 25, *191990, wherein he tenders his resignation as an attorney and counselor-at-law (22 NYCRR 691.9).

The respondent acknowledges in his affidavit that allegations of professional misconduct are being investigated by the petitioner Grievance Committee. These allegations involve the respondent taking $26,000 from his escrow account for "personal temporary use”. The respondent further acknowledges that if disciplinary charges were initiated against him based upon the alleged misconduct, he could not successfully defend himself on the merits.

The respondent further states that his resignation is freely and voluntarily tendered, that he has not been subjected to coercion or duress, and that he is fully aware of the implications of submitting his resignation.

Under the circumstances herein, the respondent’s resignation as a member of the Bar is accepted and directed to be filed. The respondent is disbarred and it is ordered that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law, effective forthwith.

Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Brown, Lawrence and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the resignation of Peter A. Lampone is accepted and directed to be filed; and it is further,

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law §90, effective immediately, Peter A. Lampone is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law; and it is further,

Ordered that Peter A. Lampone shall promptly comply with this court’s rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended and resigned attorneys (22 NYCRR 691.10); and it is further,

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, effective immediately, Peter A. Lampone is commanded to desist and refrain (1) from practicing law in any form, either as principal or agent, clerk or employee of another, (2) from appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission or other public authority, (3) from giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) from holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law.
GGP400 SERIES & GRF400 SERIES

Model Number: GGP400 & GRF400

CLEAR2O GLASS WATER FILTER PITCHER & REPLACEMENT FILTER

Docket Number: USTR-2018-0025: Exclusion Request for Humidifier Products (HTS 8421210000)

PRODUCT SUBMISSIONS:

Individual DIM:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

CORY JOHN ALTMAN,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 341 WAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 18th day of November, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED.
### MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-08-00592-CR

Luis Alberto GONZALEZ-MCNUTT a/k/a Luis Gonzalez,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial Distri ct Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2008-CR-5009

Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Alma L. López, Chief Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 17, 2008

DISMISSED

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss th is appeal by withdr awing his notice of

appeal. The motion is granted a nd this appeal is dismissed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.2(a).

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4245

Tianhai Electric North America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Universal Capital Management, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended October 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael D. Queen, President of the Company, certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.



Date: March 27, 2008



| |                                        
| | ---------------------------------------
| | /s/ Michael D. Queen                   
| | Michael D. Queen                       
| | President (Principal Executive Officer)



The foregoing certification is provided solely for purposes of complying with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Johnny Mason, Also Known as Johnny Masion, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Lowe, J.), rendered July 28, 1988, convicting defendant after a jury trial, of grand larceny in the fourth degree (Penal Law § 155.30), for which defendant was sentenced as a predicate felony offender to a term of incarceration of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

Evidence of defendant’s guilt in this case was established overwhelmingly by the testimony of a plainclothes police officer who observed defendant and an unapprehended accomplice set up and carry out a pickpocket operation against an 85-year-old woman in the Port Authority bus terminal. A detective also testified as an expert witness about how pickpocket operations are ordinarily carried out. Defendant has failed to preserve, as a matter of law, his specific challenge to admissibility of the expert testimony. (CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Love,*57 NY2d 1023, 1025.) Nor did the trial court, in whose sound discretion rests control over admissibility of expert testimony, abuse that discretion *(Selkowitz v County of Nassau,*45 NY2d 97, 101-102) so as to warrant our review in the interest of justice. We note in passing that were we to review the claim, we would conclude that the expert testimony did not bolster the testimony of the police eyewitness.

Defendant’s hearsay challenge to the testimony of an employee of the District Attorney, who explained the victim’s *145absence in terms of her advanced age, ill health and residence out of State, also is unpreserved as a matter of law by specific objection. Were we to review the claim in the interest of justice, we would find it to be without merit. The court provided a proper limiting instruction, explaining that the testimony was not being offered for its truth, and we are persuaded of the importance of the People’s obligation to explain the absence of a critical witness.

Finally, defendant has failed to preserve, as a matter of law, his specific challenges to the prosecutor’s summation comments (CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Rivera,*73 NY2d 941, 942). In any event, these claims are meritless and do not warrant review in the interest of justice. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Ross, Kassal, Smith and Rubin, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4946 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4946

 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to eliminate the 190-
day lifetime limit on inpatient psychiatric hospital services under the 
                           Medicare Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 26, 2023

Mr. Tonko (for himself and Mr. Huizenga) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to eliminate the 190-
day lifetime limit on inpatient psychiatric hospital services under the 
                           Medicare Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicare Mental Health Inpatient 
Equity Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF 190-DAY LIFETIME LIMIT ON INPATIENT PSYCHIATRIC 
              HOSPITAL SERVICES.

    (a) In General.--Section 1812 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395d) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) in paragraph (1), by adding ``or'' at the end;
                    (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ``; or'' at the 
                end and inserting a period; and
                    (C) by striking paragraph (3); and
            (2) in subsection (c), by striking ``(but shall not be 
        included'' and all that follows before the period at the end.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to items and services furnished on or after January 1, 2025.
                                 <all>
```
First Amendment to the Prudential Severance Plan



 Exhibit 10.3 

 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE 

PRUDENTIAL SEVERANCE PLAN 
  

WHEREAS, the Prudential Severance Plan (the “Plan”) was last amended and restated on September 1, 2009 by the most senior
Vice President responsible for corporate Human Resources of The Prudential Insurance Company of America, or the successor to his or her duties relating to corporate Human Resources (the “SVP”); 

 
 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 6.2 of the Plan, the SVP or
her duly appointed delegate has certain authority to amend the Plan; and 
  

WHEREAS, the SVP or her duly appointed delegate deems it appropriate and within the scope of his or her authority to amend the Plan in
various respects; 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, effective as to
the termination of employment of Eligible Employees on or after May 1, 2010, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 
  

Section 2.3 of the Plan is hereby amended and restated to read as follows: 

 
 2.3 “Base Pay” means, for any
Eligible Employee employed by a Participating Company either as a regular full-time Employee or regular part-time Employee, regular base pay including shift differential, if any, as of the date of the Eligible Employee’s Eligible Termination
(or the equivalent thereof as determined by the Company in its sole discretion). 
  

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hereby executes this First Amendment to the Plan this
28th day of April, 2010. 

 

	
	 /s/    SHARON C.
TAYLOR        

	 Sharon C. Taylor

Senior Vice President of Human Resources
00000000M0 lg 

1=;=1 

t ft01 Ottl* 

* *It &StiR tit tic, T053.23 Et1 # 

165.9 1 . 10 # 

B1 1 0532300000000 t * 

it(i)Aftfie, 

t # 

Eittflti 

AMU 

I 1
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6042

Dallas Airmotive, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

August 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6461

David C. Poole Company:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4342

Aisin World Corp. of America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of North Penn Bancorp, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Philip O. Farr, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



Date:    August 12, 2005                       /s/ Philip O. Farr
         ---------------                       -------------------------
                                               Philip O. Farr
                                               Senior Vice President and
                                               Chief Financial Officer