3198 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 9 / Friday, January 13, 1995 / Notices

Dated: December 16, 1994.

Beverly Fayson,

FAR Secretariat.

[FR Doc. 95–926 Filed 1–12–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820–34–M

DEPARTMENT OF THE DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

Defense Intelligence Agency, Scientific

Advisory Board Closed Meeting

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense

Intelligence Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of

Subsection (d) of Section 10 of Public

Law 92–463, as amended by Section 5

of Public Law 94–409, notice is hereby

given that a closed meeting of the DIA

Scientific Advisory Board has been

scheduled as follows:

DATES: March 16–17, 1995 (830 to 400).

ADDRESSES: The Defense Intelligence

Agency, Bolling AFB, Washington, D.C.

20340–5100.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dr. W.S. Williamson, Executive

Secretary, DIA Scientific Advisory

Board, Washington, D.C. 20340–1328

(202) 373–4930.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The entire

meeting is devoted to the discussion of

classified information as defined in

Section 552b(c)(I), Title 5 of the U.S.

Code and therefore will be closed to the

public. The board will receive briefings

on and discuss several current critical

intelligence issues and advise the

Director, DIA, on related scientific and

technical matters.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison

Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 95–841 Filed 1–12–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5000–04–M

Office of the Secretary of the Army

Notice of Intent to Prepare a Draft

Environmental Impact Statement

(DEIS) for Projects and Activities

Associated With Future Programs at

Aberdeen Proving Ground

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DOD.

ACTION: Notice of Intent.

SUMMARY: In accordance with Public

Law 91–190, the National

Environmental Policy Act of 1969, the

Draft Environmental Impact Statement

(DEIS) is being prepared to evaluate

environmental implications of future

decisions regarding operation of

Aberdeen Proving Ground. The DEIS

will focus on impacts of planned future

activities at Aberdeen Proving Ground;

development alternatives for the

installation Master Plan; development

potential of the installation in terms of

environmental carrying capacity; and

specific concerns regarding risk. Issues

to be considered in the proposed action

include acceptance of those new

programs projected for the installation

to include modernization or removal of

outdated facilities, and improvements to

infrastructure, utilities and service

necessary to accommodate the new

missions and changes in existing test

and evaluation missions. All missions

on the installation will be considered

including the Combat Systems Test

Activity, the Chemical and Biological

Defense Command and the Army

Research Laboratory. The Army will

conduct several small group scoping

workshops prior to preparing the

Environmental Impact statement. The

first step will be to determine the

appropriate scope of issues, activities

and alternatives to be addressed. Among

the anticipated areas to be evaluated are

public health risks and public safety,

noise, shock and vibration, water

quality, air quality, hazardous materials

management and disposal, biological

resources including threatened and

endangered species social and economic

effects, and historic and archaeological

resources. During the scoping process,

the Army will ask other agencies that

have regulatory interest in Aberdeen

Proving Ground to participate in

scoping.

DATES: Written public comments and

suggestions can be submitted by

February 13, 1995 to the address shown

below.

ADDRESSES: Commander, Aberdeen

Proving Ground Support Activity,

ATTN: STEAP–SH–ER (Edward L.

Newell, Jr.) Aberdeen Proving Ground,

Maryland 21005–5423.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Edward L. Newell, Jr., (410) 278–

6756.

Dated: January 4, 1995.

Lewis D. Walker,

Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army

(Environmental, Safety and Occupational

Health), OASA (I,L&E).

[FR Doc. 95–866 Filed 1–12–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710–08–M

Department of the Army

Intent To Prepare a Draft

Environmental Impact Statement for

Proposed Construction at Camp

Atterbury, Edinburgh, Indiana

AGENCY: Department of the Army,

Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice of Intent.

SUMMARY: This Notice of Intent is for the

preparation of a Draft Environmental

Impact Statement (DEIS) for proposed

Army National Guard projects at Camp

Atterbury, Edinburgh, Indiana. The

proposal includes renovation and

rehabitiation of existing facilities, range

improvements, demolition and

construction of facilities, and

development of ranges.

Lead Agencies are: The Military

Department of Indiana and the National

Guard Bureau.

Various alternatives have been

developed for consideration regarding

the proposed projects at Camp

Atterbury. The following constitutes a

list of those alternatives to be

considered in the DEIS:

(1) No action,

(2) Continued use and improvement

of facilities and

(3) Alternative locations off-site.

Resource categories that will be

analyzed include: physical

environment, water quality,

groundwater, air quality, biological

resources, land use, socioeconomic,

noise, and cultural resources.

SCOPING: The Military Department of

Indiana will conduct public scoping

meetings relating to the proposed

actions. Public participation in the EIS

process is essential to assist the decision

maker in defining the scope of analysis

considered in the DEIS.

Interested individuals, governmental

agencies, and private organizations are

invited to submit information and

comments on this proposed action for

consideration by the National Guard

Bureau. Information that would assist

the National Guard Bureau in analyzing

the potential significant environmental

consequences are solicited. This

includes information on other

environmental studies planned or

competed in the area of the Camp

Atterbury; other alternatives; potential

impacts associated with the proposed

action; and recommended mitigation

measures.

Concerned individuals and agencies

may express their views either by

writing to the designated point of

contact or participating in public