alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 70 (Wednesday, April 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 18587]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8995]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Notice of Sea Grant Review Panel Meeting

AGENCY: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the schedule and proposed agenda of a 
forthcoming meeting of the Sea Grant Review Panel. The meeting will 
have several purposes. Panel members will provide and discuss follow-up 
reports of business transacted at the last Sea Grant Review Panel 
meeting in the areas of management and organization, budget status, 
strategic and tactical issues, law and policy, new technology and 
research, economic development, outreach for enhancement of Department 
of Commerce goals, and new business.

DATES: The announced meeting is scheduled during 3 days: Thursday, June 
1, Noon to 3:30 p.m. and 5 p.m. to 7 p.m.; Friday, June 2, 8 a.m. to 5 
p.m.; and Saturday, June 3, 8 a.m. to 3 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Candelero Hotel, Humacao, Puerto Rico.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Chandrakant Bhumralkar, Acting 
Director, National Sea Grant College Program, National Oceanic & 
Atmospheric Administration, 1315 East-West Highway, Room 11618, Silver 
Spring, Maryland 20910, (301) 713-2448.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Panel, which consists of balanced 
representation from academia, industry, state government, and citizens 
groups, was established in 1976 by Section 209 of the Sea Grant 
Improvement Act (Public Law 94-461, 33 U.S.C. 1128) and advises the 
Secretary of Commerce, the Under Secretary for Oceans and Atmosphere, 
also the Administrator of NOAA, and the Director of the National Sea 
Grant College Program with respect to operations under the act, and 
such other matters as the Secretary refers to the Panel for review and 
advice. The agenda for the meeting is:

Thursday, June 1, 1995

Noon to 3:30 p.m.
    Introduction of new members
    Reauthorization, hearings, appropriations
    Strategic Plan and Sea Grant's Future
5-7 p.m.
    Sea Grant Management Position Papers
    Reports from Thematic Group Meetings

Friday, June 2, 1995

8 to 10:30 a.m.
    Perspectives on Sea Grant/NOAA Interactions
    National Office/Management Issues
    Council of Sea Grant Directors
12-5 p.m.
    Industrial Fellows Program
    Business/Industry Issues
    Caribbean Coastal and Marine Issues

Saturday, June 3, 1995

8-3 p.m.
    Report on Perspective Groups
    Recertification Reports
    Multiple Entities Issues

    The meeting will be open to the public.

    Dated: April 5, 1995.
Ned A. Ostenso,
Assistant Administrator for Oceanic and Atmospheric Research.
[FR Doc. 95-8995 Filed 4-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-12-P
000000092290 1 1g 

MilMil#1-216 

# M 

4 # 

44.0)itfr-1- lik/kg Ili X 111 tiIN* 

tAM )1M 

4 ig k t E ItH- t 

I * 15-PR I: 1 Nk4i.e. II 

# 111 TG53.34 ilil 111 

# 4 111# 

1 t 

4.7 1 :4 

81 1 0533400000000
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>        0000897729
<NAME>       TRUMP ATLANTIC CITY ASSOCIATES
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          71,320
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   62,586
<ALLOWANCES>                                    17,355
<INVENTORY>                                      9,393
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               137,676
<PP&E>                                       1,659,858
<DEPRECIATION>                                 203,591
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,659,006
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          110,512
<BONDS>                                      1,200,000
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     331,858
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,659,006
<SALES>                                        838,823
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               943,223
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  509,915 <F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               220,361 <F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 8,599
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             114,461
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,619
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,619
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (59,132)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (48,513)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1> Includes gaming, lodging, food & beverage and other
<F2> Includes general & administration, depreciation & amortization, and 
     preopening expenses
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                     |   |                                                                                                                     |   |
|--------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date: May 17, 2010  | By:    | /s/ Jerome Mahoney                  |   |
|                     |   | Jerome Mahoney                                                                                                           |   |
|                     |   | President, Chief Executive Officer and                                                                                   |   |
|                     |   | Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                  |   |
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6742

Dobbs Import LLC dba Heli Americas:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_05.09.19.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Tommie TURNER, Defendant/Appellant. Tommie TURNER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

Nos. 64954, 66999.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Aug. 29, 1995.

Judith C. LaRose, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Traci J. Sanders, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and WHITE, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury for second degree assault, § 565.060, RSMo 1994, and armed criminal action, § 571.015, RSMo 1994. The court sentenced him as a prior and persistent offender to concurrent prison terms of ten years for second degree assault and three years for armed criminal action. Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
<PAGE>
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-4186 and 333-30149) pertaining to the 1995 Directors Stock
Option Plan, 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 1993 Stock Plan of Conceptus,
Inc. of our report dated February 2, 1998, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of Conceptus, Inc. included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1997, filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.



Palo Alto, California
March 25, 1998
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-6163

NDK America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
Exhibit 10.9







LOAN AGREEMENT


(English Translation)







THIS LOAN AGREEMENT, is made this tenth day of January, 2009, by and among Harbin Tianmu Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., a Chinese corporation (hereinafter knows as “BORROWER”) and Mr. Mingli Yao (hereinafter knows as “LENDER”). BORROWER and LENDER shall collectively be known herein as “the Parties”. In determining the rights and duties of the Parties under this Loan Agreement, the entire document must be read as a whole.


 


In order to define the rights and obligations of the Borrowers and the Lender under relevant loan arrangements, the Parties hereby agree as follows:


 


Article 1 Amount and Interest Rate of Loan


 


1.1 Subject to the terms and conditions herein, the Lender agrees to provide the Borrowers with a loan with the principal of RMB 3,900,000.


 


1.2 The interest rate of the Loan hereunder is 7% per year.


 


Article 2 Use and Term of Loan


 



	
2.1

	
The term of the Loan hereunder shall be two(2) years, counted from the day when the Loan is provided and can be renewed every two years.







 



	
2.2

	
The loan should be used for the company and its future development.Board of directors must approve it in order to use the loan.







 


Article 3 Defaulting Liabilities


 


3.1 The Borrowers undertake to hold the Lender harmless and indemnify the Lender against any actions, charges, claims, costs, damages, demands, expenses, liabilities, losses and proceedings which the Lender may suffer or be subject to as a result of any default by the Borrowers of its obligations hereunder.


 


3.2 Notwithstanding any other provisions herein, the validity of this Article shall survive the suspension or termination of this Agreement.







This agreement is made out in three originals, one for each party and one for Harbin Tianmu Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. All of them have the same force and effect.


 




  





  











  











(Signature page)


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Loan Agreement to be executed as of the date and in the place first set forth above.


 


By:/s/ Mingli Yao


 


Name: Mingli Yao


 


Harbin Tianmu Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd


 


By:/s/ Mingli Yao


 


Name: Mingli Yao


 


Title: President
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

August 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6622

Alo USA Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
#### Will E. CLARK, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 41835.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Jan. 9, 1990.

James J. Beisman, Jr., Kansas City, for appellant.

Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before LOWENSTEIN, P.J., and KENNEDY and GAITAN, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from denial of Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 75 (Wednesday, April 19, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 19604]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9583]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION AGENCY

Overseas Private Investment Corporation


Agency Report Form Under OMB Review

AGENCY: Overseas Private Investment Corporation, IDCA.

ACTION: Request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 
Chapter 35), agencies are required to submit information collection 
requests to OMB for review and approval, and to publish a notice in the 
Federal Register notifying the public that the Agency has made such a 
submission. The proposed form under review is summarized below.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 3, 1995. If you 
anticipate commenting on the form but find that time to prepare will 
prevent you from submitting comments promptly, you should advise the 
OMB Reviewer and the Agency Submitting Officer of your intent as early 
as possible.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the subject form and the request for review 
submitted to OMB may be obtained from the Agency Submitting Officer. 
Comments on the form should be submitted to the Agency Submitting 
Officer and the OMB Reviewer.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
OPIC Agency Submitting Officer: Lena Paulson, Manager, Information 
Center, Overseas Private Investment Corporation, 1100 New York Avenue 
NW., Washington, D.C. 20527; (202) 336-8565.
OMB Reviewer: Jeff Hill, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, 
Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Docket 
Library, Room 3201, Washington, D.C. 20503; (202) 395-7340.

SUMMARY OF FORM UNDER REVIEW:
Type of Request: Extension.
Title: Preliminary Application for Financing.
Form Number: OPIC 115.
Frequency of Use: Once per project sponsor per project.
Type of Respondents: Business or other institutions.
Standard Industrial Classification Codes: All.
Description of Affected Public: U.S. companies investing overseas.
Reporting Hours: 2 hours per application.
Number of Responses: 300 per year.
Federal Cost: $9,216.00 per year.
Authority for Information Collection: Sections 231 and 234 (b) and (c) 
of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as amended.
Abstract (Needs and Uses): This application is sent to U.S. companies 
requesting information concerning OPIC's finance program. The 
information provided by these companies is reviewed by OPIC finance 
officers to determine the soundness of the proposed project and the 
applicant's qualification for receiving OPIC financial assistance.

    Dated: April 11, 1995.
James R. Offutt,
Assistant General Counsel, Department of Legal Affairs.
[FR Doc. 95-9583 Filed 4-18-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3210-01-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-2338

In re: DANIEL JOHNSON WILLIS,

 Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

Submitted: March 14, 2017 Decided: March 16, 2017

Before FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daniel Johnson Willis, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Daniel Johnson Willis petitions for a writ of mandamus 

seeking an order directing the district court to rule on all of 

Willis’s actions filed between 2013 and 2016. We note that this 

court and the district court have prefiling injunctions in place 

related to civil actions filed by Petitioner Willis. We 

conclude that Willis is not entitled to mandamus relief.

Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only 

in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court, 426 

U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v. Moussaoui, 333 F.3d 509, 

516-17 (4th Cir. 2003). Further, mandamus relief is available 

only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. 

In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 

1988). Willis has not demonstrated that the district court has 

abused its discretion in denying leave to file Willis’s actions. 

Further, Willis has routinely appealed these determinations by 

the district court. Mandamus may not be used as a substitute 

for appeal. In re Lockheed Martin Corp., 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th 

Cir. 2007). 

The relief sought by Willis is not available by way of 

mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant Willis’s motion for 

leave to amend his petition, we deny the petition and 

supplemental petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 
3

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 21

- 00214

- CR

EX PARTE GARY ARTHUR AYERS

Original Proceeding

From the 54th District Court

McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2019

- 120

- C2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Through a form document entitled, “Petition for Relief From a Conviction or

Sentence By a Person in State Custody ,” Gary Arthur Ayer s, a prison inmate, wants a

sentence reduction, a new trial, or a reversal and remand to vacat e his sentence.

Essentially, Ayers is requesting post

- conviction relief. 1

As an intermediate appellate court in Texas, our jurisdiction is limited. We do not

have habeas corpus jurisdiction of any request for post

- conviction relief in a felony

1 The form used by Ayers is for a “ Petition U nder 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for A Writ of Habeas Corpus

. ” Instruction 8 instructs the applicant to send the form to the “Clerk of the United States District Court .” It was mailed to the Clerk of the Tenth Court of Appeals of Texas.Ex parte Ayers Page 2 proceeding. See Olivo v. State , 918 S.W.2d 519, 525 n.8 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); see also T EX

.

C ODE C RIM

. P ROC . arts. 11.05, 11.07; Ex parte Mendenhall , 209 S.W.3d 260, 261 (Tex. App.

—

Waco 2006, no pet.). According to Ayers, he was convicted of the felony offense of

possession of heroin and methamphetamine with an intent to deliver and se ntenced to

30 years in prison. See T EX

. H EALTH & S AFETY C ODE § 481.112 ; T EX

. P ENAL C ODE § 12

. 32(a ).

Because we have no jurisdiction, this proceeding is dismissed for want of

jurisdiction.

TOM GRAY Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Rose

, 2 and Justice Wright 3 Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed August 31 , 2021 Do not publish [OT06]

2 The Honorable Jeff Rose, Former Chief Justice of the Third Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment of the Chief Justice of the Texas Supreme Court. See T EX

. G OV ' T C ODE §§ 74.003, 75.002, 75.003.

3 The Honorable Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retire d) of the Eleventh Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment of the Chief Justice of the Texas Supreme Court. See T EX

. G OV ' T C ODE §§ 74.003, 75.002, 75.003.