Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 9 / Friday, January 13, 1995 / Notices 3203

Comment date: January 20, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

26. White Oak Energy Company L.L.C.

[Docket No. QF95–122–000]

On December 28, 1994, White Oak

Energy Company L.L.C. (Applicant), of

101 South Main, Suite 301, Decatur,

Illinois 62523–1210 submitted for filing

an application for certification of a

facility as a qualifying small power

production facility pursuant to

§ 292.207(b) of the Commission’s

Regulations. No determination has been

made that the submittal constitutes a

complete filing.

According to the Applicant, the small

power production facility will be

located in Lockport, Illinois and will

consist of a combustion turbine

generator, a steam turbine generator and

a heat recovery boiler. The maximum

net electric power production capacity

will be of 126 MW. The primary energy

source will be petroleum coke.

Installation of the facility is expected to

commence on or before December 31,

1999.

Comment date: 30 days after the date

of publication of this notice in the

Federal Register in accordance with

Standard Paragraph E at the end of this

notice.

27. White Oak Energy Company L.L.C.

[Docket No. QF95–123–000]

On December 28, 1994, White Oak

Energy Company L.L.C. (Applicant), of

101 South Main, Suite 301, Decatur,

Illinois 62523–1210 submitted for filing

an application for certification of a

facility as a qualifying small power

production facility pursuant to

§ 292.207(b) of the Commission’s

Regulations. No determination has been

made that the submittal constitutes a

complete filing.

According to the Applicant, the small

power production facility will be

located in Joliet, Illinois and will consist

of a combustion turbine generator, a

steam turbine generator and a heat

recovery boiler. The maximum net

electric power production capacity will

be of 126 MW. The primary energy

source will be petroleum coke.

Installation of the facility is expected to

commence on or before December 31,

1999.

Comment date: 30 days after the date

of publication of this notice in the

Federal Register in accordance with

Standard Paragraph E at the end of this

notice.

Standard Paragraphs

E. Any person desiring to be heard or

to protest said filing should file a

motion to intervene or protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street, N.E.,

Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance

with Rules 211 and 214 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR

385.214). All such motions or protests

should be filed on or before the

comment date. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–858 Filed 1–12–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. EG95–15–000, et al.]

The Power Generation Co. of Trinadad

& Tobago Limited, et al. Electric Rate

and Corporate Regulation Filings

January 5, 1995.

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission:

1. The Power Generation Company of

Trinidad and Tobago Limited

[Docket No. EG95–15–000]

On December 22, 1994, The Power

Generation Company of Trinidad and

Tobago Limited, 6A Queens Park West,

First Floor, Port of Spain, Trinidad,

West Indies (the‘‘Applicant’’), filed with

the Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission an application for

determination of exempt wholesale

generator (‘‘EWG’’) status pursuant to

Part 365 of the Commission’s

regulations.

The Applicant will be engaged

directly in owning and operating

eligible facilities located in Trinidad

and Tobago: the 236 MW Penal Plant,

located at Penal, in the ward of Siparia,

County of St. Patrick, consisting of two

simple cycle gas turbines and a

combined cycle generating unit

comprised of two gas turbines, one heat

recovery steam generator, and one steam

turbine; the 634 MW Point Lisas Plant,

located at Point Lisas Industrial Estate

in the ward of Couva, County of Caroni,

consisting of ten simple cycle turbines;

and the 308 MW Port of Spain Plant,

located in the city of Port of Spain,

consisting of four steam turbine and two

simple cycle gas turbine generator units.

The facilities are all in commercial

operation. The facilities are gas fired;

the Port of Spain Plant also has the

capability to use fuel oil as a back-up.

Comment date: January 24, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice. The

Commission will limit its consideration

of comments to those that concern the

adequacy or accuracy of the application.

2. Cardinal Power of Canada, L.P.

[Docket No. EG95–16–000]

On December 30, 1994, Cardinal

Power of Canada, L.P. (‘‘Cardinal’’), 242

Henry Street, P.O. Box 70, Cardinal,

Ontario, Canada KOE–1EO, filed with

the Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) an

application for a new determination of

exempt wholesale generator status

pursuant to part 365 of the

Commission’s regulations.

Cardinal is a limited partnership

formed under the laws of the State of

Delaware and registered to do business

in Ontario, Canada. Cardinal owns,

operates and maintains a 150 MW

natural gas-fired cogeneration facility

located in Cardinal, Ontario, Canada

(the ‘‘Facility’’). Cardinal is engaged

directly and exclusively in the business

of owning and operating the Facility

and selling electric energy at wholesale.

The Facility began commercial

operation in May, 1994.

Comment date: January 24, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice. The

Commission will limit its consideration

of comments to those that concern the

adequacy or accuracy of the application.

3. Duke Power Co.

[Docket No. ER95–289–000]

Take notice that on December 14,

1994, Duke Power Company (Duke)

tendered for filing copies of estimated

billing information for calendar year

1995 pursuant to which the

Southeastern Power Administration will

be billed by Duke under Article II.1 of

the Settlement Agreement in Docket No.

ER90–315–000.

Comment date: January 20, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

4. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.

[Docket No. ER95–308–000]

Take notice that on December 19,

1994, Niagara Mohawk Power

Corporation tendered for filing a Notice

of Withdrawal of its Borderline Sales

Agreement with the Village of

Richmondville.
3204 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 9 / Friday, January 13, 1995 / Notices

Comment date: January 20, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

5. Appalachian Power Company

[Docket No. ER95–309–000]

Take notice that Appalachian Power

Company (APCo), on December 21,

1994, tendered for filing with the

Commission new Electric Service

Agreements that were executed on

December 1, 1994, by APCo and its

following wholesale customers:

a. Black Diamond Power Company—

East Hartland

b. Black Diamond Power Company—

Elkhurst

c. Black Diamond Power Company—

Sophia

d. Elk Power Company—Clay

e. Elk Power Company—Reed’s Fork

f. Elkhorn Public Service Company—

Crozier #4

g. Elkhorn Public Service Company—

Elkhorn

h. Kimball Light & Water Company

i. Union Power Company—Mullens

j. Union Power Company—Pierpont

k. Union Power Company—Rhodell

l. United Light & Power Company

m. War Light & Power Company

The agreements are intended to

replace the existing service agreements

between APCO and the companies

listed above, which expired on

November 30, 1994.

APCo proposes an effective date of

December 1, 1994, and states that a copy

of its filing was served on the affected

customers and the Public Service

Commission of West Virginia.

Comment date: January 20, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

6. Consolidated Edison Company of

New York, Inc.

[Docket No. ER95–310–000]

Take notice that on December 21,

1994, Consolidated Edison Company of

New York, Inc. (Con Edison), tendered

for filing a Supplement to its Rate

Schedule, Con Edison Rate Schedule

FERC No. 2, a facilities agreement with

Central Hudson Gas and Electric

Corporation (CH). The Supplement

provides for a decrease in the monthly

carrying charges. Con Edison has

requested that this decrease take effect

as of January 1, 1995.

Con Edison states that a copy of this

filing has been served by mail upon CH.

Comment date: January 20, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

7. Consolidated Edison Company of

New York, Inc.

[Docket No. ER95–311–000]

Take notice that on December 21,

1994, Consolidated Edison Company of

New York, Inc. (Con Edison), tendered

for filing a Supplement to its Rate

Schedule, Con Edison Rate Schedule

FERC No. 127 a facilities agreement

with the New York Power Authority

(NYPA). The Supplement provides for a

decrease in the monthly carrying

charges. Con Edison has requested that

this decrease take effect as of January 1,

1995.

Con Edison states that a copy of this

filing has been served by mail upon

NYPA.

Comment date: January 20, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

8. PECO Energy Company

[Docket No. ER95–312–000]

Take notice that on December 21,

1994, PECO Energy Company (PECO),

tendered for filing an Agreement

between PECO and Delmarva Power &

Light Company (DPL), dated May 24,

1994.

PECO states that the Agreement sets

forth terms and conditions for the sale

of capacity and energy over

approximately a 10 year period. PECO

requested that the Commission permit

the Agreement to become effective on

the closing date of the sale of

Conowingo Power Company stock by

PECO to DPL, which is the subject of a

Joint Application at Docket No. EC95–

3. PECO also requests expedited

treatment and Commission acceptance

of the Agreement on or before the date

the Commission approves the

aforementioned Joint Application filed

under Docket No. EC95–3.

PECo states that a copy of this filing

has been sent to DPL and will be

furnished to the Pennsylvania Public

Utility Commission, Maryland Public

Service Commission, and Virginia State

Corporation.

Comment date: January 20, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

9. Consolidated Edison Company of

New York, Inc.

[Docket No. ER95–313–000]

Take notice that on December 21,

1994, Consolidated Edison Company of

New York, Inc. (Con Edison) tendered

for filing an agreement to provide

interruptible transmission service for

Delmarva Power and Light Company

(Delmarva).

Con Edison states that a copy of this

filing has been served by mail upon

Delmarva.

Comment date: January 20, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

10. Entergy Power, Inc.

[Docket No. ER95–314–000]

Take notice that Entergy Power Inc.

(EPI) on December 21, 1995, tendered

for filing a Monthly Purchase and Sale

Agreement with AES Power, Inc.

EPI requests an effective date for the

Interchange Agreement that is one (1)

day after the date of filing, and

respectfully requests waiver of the

Commission notice requirements in

Section 35.11 of the Commission’s

regulations.

Comment date: January 20, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

11. Southern California Edison

Company

[Docket No. ER95–317–000]

Take notice that on December 21,

1994, Southern California Edison

Company (Edison), tendered for filing

the following operating procedure

between Sacramento Municipal Utility

District (SMUD) and Edison, in

accordance with the terms of the 1988

Edison-SMUD Power Sale Agreement

(Agreement):

Operating Procedure No. 2 for EdisonSMUD 1988 Power Sale Agreement

(Procedure No. 2).

In addition, to setting forth details for

scheduling and dispatching Operating

Capacity and deliveries of Associated

Energy under the terms of the

Agreement, Procedure No. 2 also

provides for coordination between the

1988 and 1994 Power Sale Agreements

between Edison and SMUD.

Copies of the filing were served upon

the Public Utilities Commission of the

State of California and all interested

parties.

Comment date: January 20, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

12. Colmac Energy, Inc.

[Docket No. QF86–856–001]

On December 28, 1994, Colmac

Energy, Inc. (Colmac), of Mecca,

California submitted for filing an

application for recertification of a

facility as a qualifying facility pursuant

to Section 292.207(b) of the

Commission’s Regulations. No

determination has been made that the

submittal constitutes a complete filing.

According to the applicant, the small

power production facility will be
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 9 / Friday, January 13, 1995 / Notices 3205

located near Mecca, California. The

Commission previously certified the

facility as a qualifying small power

production facility, Colmac Energy, Inc.,

37 FERC ¶ 62,034 (1986). The instant

application for recertification is due to

a change in the fuel to be used by the

facility.

Comment date: Thirty days after the

date of publication in the Federal

Register, in accordance with Standard

Paragraph E at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs

E. Any person desiring to be heard or

to protest said filing should file a

motion to intervene or protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street, NE.,

Washington, DC 20426, in accordance

with Rules 211 and 214 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR

385.214). All such motions or protests

should be filed on or before the

comment date. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–859 Filed 1–12–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

[Docket No. CP95–137–000, et al.]

Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline

Company, et al.; Natural Gas

Certificate Filings

January 5, 1995.

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission:

1. Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline

Company

[Docket No. CP95–137–000]

Take notice that on December 28,

1994, Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline

Company (Williston Basin), 200 North

Third Street, Suite 300, Bismarck, North

Dakota 58501, filed request with the

Commission in Docket No. CP95–370–

000 pursuant to §§ 157.205 and

157.216(b) of the Commission’s

Regulations under the Natural Gas Act

(NGA) for authorization to abandon a

town border station under the blanket

certificate issued in Docket No. CP82–

487–000, all as more fully set forth in

the request on file with the Commission

and open to public inspection.

Williston Basin proposes to abandon

the Ward Road Town Border Station

(Ward Station), located in Burleigh

County, North Dakota, which has

provided service to Montana-Dakota

Utilities Company (Montana-Dakota).

Williston Basin states that MontanaDakota because of an existing station,

Missouri River Border Station and the

North Bismarck Border Station possess

sufficient capacity to provide reliable

service to Montana-Dakota and therefore

propose to abandon Ward Station,

which would consist of a 14′ × 16′

building, regulators, valves and station

piping. The fence enclosing the facilities

and a mainline valve setting would

remain at the site for emergency use.

Williston Basin further states that the

abandonment of this border station will

not affect Williston Basin’s peak day or

annual transportation to MontanaDakota.

Comment date: February 21, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph G

at the end of this notice.

2. Mississippi River Transmission

Corporation

[Docket No. CP95–140–000]

Take notice that on December 30,

1994, Mississippi River Transmission

Corporation (MRT), 9900 Clayton Road,

St. Louis, Missouri 63124, filed in

Docket No. CP95–140–000 a request

pursuant to §§ 157.205, 157.212, and

157.216(b) of the Commission’s

Regulations under the Natural Gas Act

(18 CFR 157.205, 157.212, and

157.216(b)) for authorization to relocate

a delivery point that serves one of its

existing firm transportation customers,

Arkla, a division of NorAm Energy

Corp. under MRT’s blanket certificate

issued in Docket No. CP82–489–000

pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas

Act, all as more fully set forth in the

request that is on file with the

Commission and open to public

inspection.

MRT proposes to relocate the delivery

point to Arkla that serves customers in

the town of Alica, Arkansas from MRT’s

Main Line No. 1 to MRT’s Main Line

No. 2. MRT states that the relocation of

the delivery point to MRT’s Main Line

No. 2 will not result in any change in

the total daily or annual quantities of

natural gas MRT is authorized to

transport for Arkla pursuant to its

existing Transportation Service

Agreement.

Comment date: February 21, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph G

at the end of this notice.

3. Columbia Gas Transmission

Corporation

[Docket No. CP95–141–000]

Take notice that on December 30,

1994, Columbia Gas Transmission

Corporation (Columbia), 1700

MacCorkle Avenue, S.E., Charleston,

West Virginia 25314–1599, filed in

Docket No. CP95–141–000, an

application pursuant to Section 7(b) of

the Natural Gas Act for an order

granting permission and approval to

abandon transportation service

Columbia rendered in accordance with

its Rate Schedule X–112, a best efforts

transportation service of 500 Dth/day,

for West Virginia Wesleyan College

(Wesleyan) in Upshur County, West

Virginia until August, 1993, all as more

fully set forth in the application which

is on file with the Commission and open

to public inspection.

In its application, Columbia states

that the gas originated from wells

located in Barbour County, West

Virginia which were purchased by

Weslyan in an attempt to reduce energy

costs for the school. Columbia received

the gas at an existing point of receipt on

its Line 8000 in Belington, West

Virginia and transported it to existing

points of interconnection between

Columbia and Columbia Gas of West

Virginia, Inc. in Upshur County, West

Virginia for subsequent delivery to

Wesleyan. Columbia states that the

transportation authority is no longer

required as the transportation agreement

has been terminated and Columbia is

currently providing Wesleyan Part 284

Interruptible Transportation Service.

Comment date: January 26, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph F

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs

F. Any person desiring to be heard or

to make any protest with reference to

said application should on or before the

comment date, file with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission,

Washington, D.C. 20426, a motion to

intervene or a protest in accordance

with the requirements of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211)

and the Regulations under the Natural

Gas Act (18 CFR 157.10). All protests

filed with the Commission will be

considered by it in determining the

appropriate action to be taken but will

not serve to make the protestants parties

to the proceeding. Any person wishing

to become a party to a proceeding or to

participate as a party in any hearing

therein must file a motion to intervene

in accordance with the Commission’s

Rules.