Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 67 / Friday, April 7, 1995 / Notices 17783

is on file with the Commission and open

to public inspection.

Koch proposes to install the pipeline

and appurtenant facilities to

accommodate two delivery taps for

service to Bay Gas, an intrastate storage

company, and Clarke-Mobile, a local

distribution company. Koch states that

the tap for Bay Gas will provide a

connection to Bay Gas’ facilities and the

tap for Clarke-Mobile will permit

deliveries at a higher pressure than is

available from the existing

interconnection with Clarke-Mobile.

It is stated that Koch would use the

delivery taps for the delivery of up to

73,000 Mcf of gas on a peak day to Bay

Gas and up to 30,000 Mcf of gas on a

peak day to Clarke-Mobile. It is stated

that these volumes are within both

customers’ existing daily entitlements. It

is asserted that deliveries to both Bay

Gas and Clarke-Mobile would be made

under Koch’s ITS and FTS rate

schedules. It is further asserted that the

tap proposed for Bay Gas would be bidirectional and would be used for the

receipt by Koch of up to 202,000 Mcf of

gas on a peak day from Bay Gas.

The total construction cost is

estimated at $1.68 million, of which

Koch will receive $1 million as

contribution-in-aid of construction.

Koch states that it has sufficient

capacity to render the proposed service

without detriment or disadvantage to its

other existing customers and that its

tariff does not prohibit the addition of

delivery taps.

Any person or the Commission’s staff

may, within 45 days after issuance of

the instant notice by the Commission,

file pursuant to Rule 214 of the

Commission’s Procedural Rules (18 CFR

385.214) a motion to intervene or notice

of intervention and pursuant to section

157.205 of the Regulations under the

Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a

protest to the request. If no protest is

filed within the time allowed therefor,

the proposed activity shall be deemed to

be authorized effective the day after the

time allowed for filing a protest. If a

protest is filed and not withdrawn

within 30 days after the time allowed

for filing a protest, the instant request

shall be treated as an application for

authorization pursuant to section 7 of

the Natural Gas Act.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–8535 Filed 4–6–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. CP95–287–000]

Mojave Pipeline Company; Request

Under Blanket Authorization

April 3, 1995.

Take notice that on March 28, 1995,

Mojave Pipeline Company (Mojave),

5001 E. Commercenter Drive,

Bakersfield, California 93309, filed in

Docket No. CP95–287–000 a request

pursuant to Sections 157.205 and

157.211 of the Commission’s

Regulations under the Natural Gas Act

(18 CFR 157.205, 157.211) to construct

and operate a sale tap under Mojave’s

blanket certificate issued in Docket Nos.

CP89–1–000 and CP89–2–000 pursuant

to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, all

as more fully set forth in the request that

is on file with the Commission and open

to public inspection.

Mojave proposes to construct a sales

tap and metering and appurtenant

facilities onto its existing 42-inch line in

Kern County, California to transport

natural gas on behalf of TehachapiCummings County Water District

(Tehachapi-Cummings). Mojave states

these facilities would be used to

transport up to 3,000 MMBtu per day on

behalf of Tehachapi-Cummings

pursuant to Mojave’s FT–1 and IT–1 rate

schedules. Mojave states that the service

rendered to Tehachapi-Cummings

through the proposed facilities will have

no material impact on Mojave’s peak

day or annual deliveries.

Any person or the Commission’s staff

may, within 45 days after issuance of

the instant notice by the Commission,

file pursuant to Rule 214 of the

Commission’s Procedural Rules (18 CFR

385.214) a motion to intervene or notice

of intervention and pursuant to Section

157.205 of the Regulations under the

Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a

protest to the request. If no protest is

filed within the time allowed therefore,

the proposed activity shall be deemed to

be authorized effective the day after the

time allowed for filing a protest. If a

protest is filed and not withdrawn

within 30 days after the time allowed

for filing a protest the instant request

shall be treated as an application for

authorization pursuant to Section 7 of

the Natural Gas Act.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–8536 Filed 4–6–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. RP94–251–003]

National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation;

Request for Waiver

April 3, 1995.

Take notice that on March 29, 1995,

National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation

(National) tendered for filing a request

for an extension of a waiver granted by

the Commission related to Section

21.1(a) of its FERC Gas Tariff.

National states that on June 16, 1994,

the Commission issued a Letter Order in

the above-referenced docket granting

waiver of Section 21.1(a) of its tariff to

allow National to file a report on or

before June 1, 1995, to reflect the

balances of its Account Nos. 191, 858

and 186 related to the flowthrough of

costs by Columbia Gas Transmission

Corporation (Columbia) and CNG

Transmission Corporation.

National states that it is filing to

extend the waiver of Section 21.1(a) of

its tariff to the extent the Commission

grants Columbia an extension of the

close-out period for its Account No. 191,

as requested by Columbia in Docket No.

RP94–273–000.

Any person desiring to protest said

filing should file a protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street, NE.,

Washington, DC, 20426, in accordance

with Rule 211 of the Commission’s

Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR

385.211). All such protest should be

filed on or before April 10, 1995.

Protests will be considered by the

Commission in determining the

appropriate action to be taken but will

not serve to make protestants parties to

the proceeding. Copies of this filing are

on file with the Commission and are

available for public inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–8538 Filed 4–6–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket Nos. RP95–88–001, RP95–112–006,

RP93–148–004, RP95–62–000, RP95–63–

000, RP95–64–000, and RP95–90–000]

Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.; Notice of

Proposed Tariff Revisions

April 3, 1995.

Take notice that on March 30, 1995,

Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company

(Tennessee), tendered for filing

proposed tariff revisions in response to

various rate and tariff issues discussed

at a March 6–9, 1995 technical

conference convened by the

Commission in the above-referenced

dockets. Tennessee further states that

the filing contains (1) A response to