alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
10.24

    


    Compensation
of Outside Directors

    


    Until the
elimination of the previously-implemented (January 2009) 10% salary reduction
for employees and equivalent reduction in the compensation payable to the
Company’s outside (non-employee) directors, the cash compensation payable to the
outside directors is as follows:

     

    
      	
               
      

            	
              ·

            	
              the
      annual cash retainer payable for Company Board-level (as opposed to
      Committee-level) service will be
$27,000;

            


    

    
      	
               
      

            	
              ·

            	
              the
      annual cash retainer payable to the chairman of the Audit Committee will
      be $10,800;

            


    

    
      	
               
      

            	
              ·

            	
              the
      annual cash retainer payable to the chairman of the Compensation Committee
      will be $8,100;

            


    

    
      	
               
      

            	
              ·

            	
              the
      annual cash compensation payable to the chairman of the Corporate
      Governance Committee will be $6,300;
and

            


    

    
      	
               
      

            	
              ·

            	
              the
      annual cash retainer payable to the Lead Independent Director will be
      $10,800.

            


    

     

    The
per-meeting fees payable to the outside directors are as follows:

     

    
      	
               
      

            	
              ·

            	
              for
      in-person Board of Directors meetings,
$1,440;

            


    

    
      	
               
      

            	
              ·

            	
              for
      in-person Committee meetings, $1,080;
and

            


    

    
      	
               
      

            	
              ·

            	
              for
      telephonic meetings of the Board of Directors or a Committee lasting less
      than one hour, an amount equal to 50% of the per meeting for a Board of
      Directors or Committee meeting, as applicable;
  and

            


    

    
      	
               
      

            	
              ·

            	
              on
      and after February 1, 2010, the Chairman of the Joint Special Committee
      shall be paid additional compensation at the rate of $150 per hour in
      recognition of his increased responsibilities in connection with the
      search for a new chief executive
officer.

            


    

     

    In
addition, if and when a Special Committee is needed, the amount of the
compensation payable to the members of such Committee will be: $4,500 per month
for the chairman; $2,250 per month for the vice-chairman; and $1,800 per meeting
for all members of the Special Committee. The additional compensation will be
discontinued when any Special Committee project is suspended or
concluded.
#### Clifford HARRIS, Petitioner/Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent/Respondent.

No. 68026.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

April 30, 1996.

*141Melvin L. Raymond, Wilson & Associates, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, James A. Chenault, III, Special Assistant Attorney General, Missouri Department of Revenue, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and GRIMM, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner appeals from the trial court’s denial of his petition to review the revocation of his driver’s license for refusal to submit to a chemical test of the alcoholic content of his blood. § 577.041, RSMo 1994. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-11-0000653 31-MAR-2014 11:20 AM
#### Thomas WILLIAMS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

No. 66658.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

March 7, 1995.

Nancy L. Vincent, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., David G. Brown, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before GRIMM, C.J., REINHARD, P.J., and CRAHAN, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the motion court’s dismissal, for untimeliness, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The motion court’s conclusion is not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. Rule 84.16(b).
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

April 12, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6768

Apex Sourcing & Manufacturing: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_04.15.19.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Universal Truckload Services, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the thirteen weeks ended April 2, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Donald B. Cochran, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Robert E.
Sigler, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, respectively, that (1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 11, 2005

                                        /s/ Donald B. Cochran
                                        -----------------------
                                        Donald B. Cochran
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer

                                        /s/ Robert E. Sigler
                                        ------------------------
                                        Robert E. Sigler
                                        Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
                                        Secretary and Treasurer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 13, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4158

Cummins Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5728

A.W. Chesterton Company:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

               LETTER TO COMMISSION PURSUANT TO TEMPORARY NOTE 3T

                                 March 29, 2002

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549-0408

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to Temporary Note 3T to Article 3 of Regulation S-X, Trump Atlantic
City Associates has obtained a letter of representation from Arthur Andersen LLP
"(Andersen") stating that the December 31, 2001 audit was subject to their
quality control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide
reasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance with
professional standards, that there was appropriate continuity of Andersen
personnel working on the audit and availability of national office consultation.
Availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of Andersen is not relevant to
this audit.

                                                Very truly yours,

                                                TRUMP ATLANTIC CITY
                                                ASSOCIATES

                                                By: Trump Atlantic City
                                                    Holding, Inc., General
                                                    Partner

                                                By: /s/ Robert M. Pickus
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                         Robert M. Pickus
                                                   Vice President, Secretary and
                                                   General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 9 (Friday, January 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 3206]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-865]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-98-000]


Columbia Gas Transmission Corp.; Notice of Petition For Approval 
of Stipulation

January 9, 1995.
    Take notice that on December 20, 1994, pursuant to Rule 207 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.207, Columbia 
Gas Transmission Corporation (Columbia) filed a petition requesting 
that the Commission issue an order approving the stipulation entered 
into by Columbia and Ozark Transmission System (Ozark) on December 9, 
1994. Columbia states that the stipulation terminates Columbia's 
contractual obligations under a transportation contract, Contract No. 
MS-27534-AR, between Columbia and Ozark through the payment of a 
negotiated Exit Fee by Columbia to Ozark.
    The stipulation is contingent upon Bankruptcy Court and Commission 
approval, including Commission approval of Columbia's full recovery 
from Columbia's customers of the Exit Fee paid to Ozark.
    Comments on the settlement, as well as motions to intervene or 
protests should be filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 
825 North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, on or before 
January 30, 1995. Reply comments should be filed on or before February 
9, 1995. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining 
the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make 
protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a 
party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this petition are on 
file with the Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-865 Filed 1-12-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**480 KA 10-01881**  PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V ORDER

JERRELL ALLEN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

FRANK H. HISCOCK LEGAL AID SOCIETY, SYRACUSE (PHILIP ROTHSCHILD OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (JAMES P. MAXWELL OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Onondaga County Court (Joseph E. Fahey, J.), rendered January 7, 2009. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Entered: April 20, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
**Exhibit32.1**

#### **CERTIFICATEOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICERS**

This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to therequirements of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes andCriminal Procedures) of the United States Code and shall not be relied on byany person for any other purpose.

The undersigned, who are the Chief Executive Officerand Chief Financial Officer of Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT I, Inc. (the “Company”),each hereby certify as follows:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company (the “Report”),which accompanies this Certificate, fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and allinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 13th day ofNovember, 2006.
|        | /s/ Robert M.  Behringer                     |
|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|   | Robert M. Behringer, Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                                         |
|   | /s/ Gary S. Bresky                           |
|   | Gary S. Bresky, Chief Financial Officer      |

 

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrantand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
Exhibit 99.1


                         CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  each  of the
undersigned  certifies  that  this  periodic  report  fully  complies  with  the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as
amended, and that information contained in this periodic report fairly presents,
in all material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of
Ridgewood Electric Power Trust II.

Date:  April 16, 2003        /s/ Robert E. Swanson
                             --------------------------------
                             Robert E. Swanson
                             Chief Executive Officer

Date:  April 16, 2003        /s/ Christopher I. Naunton
                             --------------------------------
                             Christopher I. Naunton
                             Chief Financial Officer

This  certification  accompanies this periodic report pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5123 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5123

 To amend the Fair Credit Reporting Act to modify the applicability of 
  credit monitoring for active duty military consumers, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 1, 2023

  Ms. Porter introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Fair Credit Reporting Act to modify the applicability of 
  credit monitoring for active duty military consumers, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Credit Monitoring Integrity Act of 
2023''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO APPLICABILITY OF CREDIT MONITORING FOR ACTIVE DUTY 
              MILITARY CONSUMERS.

    Section 605A(k) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681c-
1(k)) is amended by striking paragraph (4).
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Sirrena TRUITT, Appellant.

No. WD 50801.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

May 21, 1996.

Matthew J. O’Connor, Asst. Public Defender, St. Joseph, for Appellant.

Pamela L. Cone, Asst. Prosecuting Attorney, St. Joseph, for Respondent.

Before FENNER, C.J., P.J., and SPINDEN and ELLIS, JJ.

*81ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from conviction, after trial by jury, of criminal non-support, a class A misdemeanor, pursuant to § 568.040, RSMo 1994.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).'
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6016

Kyungshin Lear Sales and Engineering LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

“Made in China 2025” or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5038

A.W. Chesterton Company:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel