Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 70 / Wednesday, April 12, 1995 / Notices 18581

have Warren conduct the activity on its

behalf at the proposed Sturtevant site.

Zone procedures would exempt

Publications International from payment

of Customs duties on foreign

merchandise that is used in products

made for export. On its domestic sales,

zone procedures would allow the

company to choose the duty-free rate

that applies to books. The duty rate on

the sound pads (classified as electrical

machines and apparatus) is 3.9 percent.

In accordance with the Board’s

regulations, a member of the FTZ Staff

has been designated examiner to

investigate the application and report to

the Board.

Public comment on the application is

invited from interested parties.

Submissions (original and 3 copies)

shall be addressed to the Board’s

Executive Secretary at the address

below. The closing period for their

receipt is June 12, 1995. Rebuttal

comments in response to material

submitted during the foregoing period

may be submitted during the subsequent

15-day period to June 26, 1995.

A copy of the application and

accompanying exhibits will be available

for public inspection at each of the

following locations:

U.S. Department of Commerce District

Office, 517 E. Wisconsin Avenue,

Room 596, Milwaukee, Wisconsin

53202

Office of the Executive Secretary,

Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room

3716, 14th and Pennsylvania Avenue,

NW., Washington, DC 20230

Dated: April 5, 1995.

John J. Da Ponte, Jr.,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–8987 Filed 4–11–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

International Trade Administration

Notice of Partial Termination of

Administrative Review of Antidumping

Duty Order; Certain CorrosionResistant Carbon Steel Flat Products

From Australia, Certain Cold-Rolled

Carbon Steel Flat Products From

Germany, and Certain CorrosionResistant Carbon Steel Flat Products

From Korea

In the matter of: (A–602–803)—Certain

Corrosion-Resistant Carbon Steel Flat

Products from Australia; (A–428–814)—

Certain Cold-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat

Products from Germany; and (A–580–816)—

Certain Corrosion-Resistant Carbon Steel Flat

Products from Korea.

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of partial termination of

antidumping duty administrative

review.

SUMMARY: In response to requests from

Australian National Industries

Corporation Ltd. (‘‘ANI’’) of Australia;

C.D. Wa ̈lzholz (‘‘Wa ̈lzholz’’), J.N. Eberle

& Cie., GmBH (‘‘Eberle’’), and Ro ̈chling

Kaltwalzwerk, KG (‘‘Ro ̈chling’’) of

Germany; and Pohang Coated Steel Co.,

Ltd. (‘‘PCS’’), the Department of

Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) initiated

administrative reviews of these

companies on September 8, 1994. The

Department received timely requests for

withdrawal on October 7 (from

Wa ̈lzholz), November 3 (from ANI),

November 16 (from PCS and Dongkuk),

and December 7 (from Ro ̈chling). On

December 13, 1994, Eberle requested the

Department to extend the time limit for

it to withdraw from the antidumping

duty review. Based upon the

consideration of the facts of this case,

the Department concluded it would be

reasonable to grant Eberle’s request to

withdraw at this point in the review

process. Because there were no other

requests for review of these companies

from any other interested party, the

Department is now terminating these

reviews with respect to all of the

companies listed above.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 12, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sally Gannon (ANI), Bruce Harsh

(Eberle), Alain Letort (Wa ̈lzholz), Holly

Vineyard (Ro ̈chling), or Lisa Yarbrough

(PCS and Dongkuk); Office of

Agreements Compliance, Import

Administration, International Trade

Administration, U.S. Department of

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution

Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20230;

telephone (202) 482–3793.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August

30, 1994, the Department received

requests from Wa ̈lzholz, Eberle, and

Ro ̈chling, for review of the antidumping

duty orders on certain cold-rolled

carbon steel flat products from

Germany, and from PCS for certain

corrosion-resistant carbon steel flat

products from the Republic of Korea, to

conduct administrative reviews of the

antidumping duty orders pursuant to

section 353.22(a)(2) of the Department’s

regulations (19 CFR 353.33(a)(2)). On

August 31, 1994, the Department

received a request from ANI to conduct

an administrative review for certain

corrosion-resistant carbon steel flat

products from Australia pursuant to the

same regulations mentioned before.

On September 8, 1994, the

Department published in the Federal

Register a Notice of Initiation for these

reviews (59 FR 46391). Wa ̈lzholz

(October 7, 1994), ANI (November 3,

1994), PCS (November 16, 1994), and

Ro ̈chling (December 7, 1994) timely

withdrew their requests for

administrative reviews. These

withdrawals were made within the time

limits established in section 353.22(a)(5)

of the Departments regulations and so

the Department is terminating those

reviews.

Further, according to 19 CFR

353.22(a)(5), the Department may

extend the 90-day time limit, from the

date of publication of notice of

initiation, to withdraw a request for

review if the Department determines it

is reasonable to do so. In this case,

Eberle requested that the Department

allow it to withdraw from the review six

days after the deadline. According to

Eberle, the Department’s extensive

deficiency questionnaire was received

and reviewed by the company officials

in Germany after the 90-day time limit

had expired. In making the request to

withdraw, Eberle stressed that the cost

and the amount of detailed information

that would be required within a

relatively short period were greater than

the company had anticipated when it

requested a review. Additionally,

petitioners did not object to Eberle’s

request. Due to the circumstances of this

case, the relative proximity of Eberle’s

request to the expiration deadline, and

because this decision does not

encourage manipulation of the review

process in an attempt to achieve lower

(or higher) margins, the Department has

determined that it would be reasonable

to grant the withdrawal at this time.

Therefore, in accordance with

§ 353.22(a)(5) of the Department’s

regulations, the Department will

terminate these administrative reviews

for ANI, Wa ̈lzholz, Ro ̈chling, Eberle,

and PCS.

Because we are terminating these

reviews, we shall instruct the Customs

Service to liquidate entries for

Wa ̈lzholz, Ro ̈chling, Eberle, and PCS at

the cash deposit rate established during

the original fair-value investigation.

With regard to ANI, we will instruct

Customs to return all cash deposits to

ANI which Customs erroneously

collected for merchandise exported by

ANI that is specifically excluded from

the order on corrosion-resistant steel flat

products, i.e., clad products in straight

lengths of 0.1875 inch or more in

composite thickness and of a width

which exceeds 150 millimeters or

measures at least twice the thickness.

(See 58 FR 44161, August 19, 1993.)

Furthermore, because PCS (as a

related company to Pohang Iron and

Steel Company, Ltd.) was previously
18582 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 70 / Wednesday, April 12, 1995 / Notices

investigated, the cash deposit rate for

PCS will continue to be the companyspecific rate found for Pohang Iron and

Steel Company in the original (for coldrolled and corrosion-resistant flat

products only). Because Wa ̈lzholz,

Ro ̈chling, and Eberle were not

previously investigated companies, the

cash deposit rate will continue to be the

‘‘all other rate’’ assigned to their

respective countries.

This notice is published in

accordance with 19 CFR 353.22(a)(5).

Dated: April 5, 1995.

Joseph A. Spetrini,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Compliance.

[FR Doc. 95–8989 Filed 4–11–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

[C–331–601]

Determination to Revoke

Countervailing Duty Order; Cut

Flowers From Ecuador

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of determination to

revoke countervailing duty order.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce

(the Department) is revoking the

countervailing duty order on cut flowers

from Ecuador because it is no longer of

interest to interested parties.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 12, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Brian Albright or Stephanie Moore,

Office of Countervailing Compliance,

Import Administration, International

Trade Administration, U.S. Department

of Commerce, 14th Street and

Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,

DC 20230; telephone: (202)482–2786.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

On December 30, 1994, the

Department published in the Federal

Register (59 FR 67700) its intent to

revoke the countervailing duty order on

cut flowers from Ecuador (52 FR 1361;

January 13, 1987). Additionally, as

required by 19 CFR

355.25(d)(4)(ii)(1994), the Department

served, by certified mail, written notice

of its intent to revoke this

countervailing duty order on each party

listed on its most current service list.

Scope of the Order

Imports covered by this order are

shipments of Ecuadorian fresh cut

miniature (spray) carnations, standard

carnations, standard chrysanthemums,

and pompon chrysanthemums. This

merchandise is currently classified

under item numbers 0603.10.30,

0603.10.70, and 0603.10.80 of the

Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS).

Daisies are excluded from the scope of

the countervailing duty order. The HTS

item numbers are provided for

convenience and Customs purposes.

The written description remains

dispositive.

Determination to Revoke

The Department may revoke a

countervailing duty order if it concludes

that the order is no longer of interest to

interested parties. We conclude that

there is no interest in a countervailing

duty order when no interested party (as

defined in §§ 355.2 (i)(3), (i)(4), (i)(5),

and (i)(6) of the Department’s

regulations) has requested an

administrative review for at least five

consecutive review periods and when

no domestic interested party objects to

the revocation (19 CFR 355.25(d)(4)(iii)).

We received no requests for

administrative review for the previous

five consecutive review periods and no

objections to our notice of intent to

revoke the countervailing duty order.

Therefore, we have concluded that the

countervailing duty order covering cut

flowers from Ecuador is no longer of

interest to interested parties, and we are

revoking this countervailing duty order

in accordance with 19 CFR

355.25(d)(4)(iii).

Further, as required by 19 CFR

355.25(d)(5), the Department is

terminating the suspension of

liquidation on the subject merchandise

as of the effective date of this notice,

and will instruct the Customs Service to

liquidate, without regard to

countervailing duties, all unliquidated

entries of this merchandise exported

from Ecuador on or after January 1,

1994.

This notice is published in

accordance with 19 CFR

355.25(d)(4)(iii).

Dated: April 5, 1995.

Joseph A. Spetrini,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Compliance.

[FR Doc. 95–8990 Filed 4–11–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

Export Trade Certificate of Review

ACTION: Notice of Application to Amend

Certificate.

SUMMARY: The Office of Export Trading

Company Affairs (OETCA) International

Trade Administration, Department of

Commerce, has received an application

to amend an Export Trade Certificate of

Review. This notice summarizes the

proposed amendment and requests

comments relevant to whether the

Certificate should be issued.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: W.

Dawn Busby, Director, Office of Export

Trading Company Affairs, International

Trade Administration, (202) 482–5131.

This is not a toll-free number.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title III of

the Export Trading Company Act of

1982 (15 U.S.C. Sections 4001–21)

authorizes the Secretary of Commerce to

issue Export Trade Certificates of

Review. A Certificate of Review protects

the holder and the members identified

in the Certificate from state and federal

government antitrust actions and from

private, treble damage antitrust actions

for the export conduct specified in the

Certificate and carried out in

compliance with its terms and

conditions. Section 302(b)(1) of the Act

and 15 CFR 325.6(a) require the

Secretary to publish notice in the

Federal Register identifying the

applicant and summarizing its proposed

export conduct.

Request for Public Comments

Interested parties may submit written

comments relevant to the determination

whether an amended Certificate should

be issued. An original and five (5)

copies should be submitted no later

than 20 days after the date of this notice

to: Office of Export Trading Company

Affairs, International Trade

Administration, Department of

Commerce, Room 1800H, Washington,

D.C. 20230. Information submitted by

any person is exempt from disclosure

under the Freedom of Information Act

(5 U.S.C. 552). Comments should refer

to this application as ‘‘Export Trade

Certificate of Review, application

number 92–4A001.

An original Certificate of Review was

issued to Aerospace Industries

Association of America, Inc. (‘‘AIA’’) on

April 10, 1992 (57 FR 13707, April 17,

1992) and previously amended on

September 8, 1992 (57 FR 41920,

September 14, 1992), October 8, 1993

(58 FR 53711, October 18, 1993), and on

November 17, 1994 (50 FR 60349,

November 23, 1994). A summary of the

application for amendment follows:

Summary of the Application

Applicant: Aerospace Industries

Association of America, Inc. (‘‘AIA’’),

1250 Eye Street, NW., Washington,

DC 20005, Contact: Mac S. Dunaway,

Esquire, Telephone: (202) 862–9700

Application No.: 92–4A001

Date Deemed Submitted: March 28,

1995