alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4911 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4911

 To provide for the establishment of a pilot program to provide grants 
to community mental health centers for the placement of social workers 
         with law enforcement agencies, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 26, 2023

   Mr. Harder of California introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for the establishment of a pilot program to provide grants 
to community mental health centers for the placement of social workers 
         with law enforcement agencies, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Supporting the Health and Safety of 
Law Enforcement Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT.

    Not later than 6 months after the date of enactment of this Act, 
the Attorney General shall establish a pilot program to provide grants 
to community mental health centers for the placement of social workers 
with law enforcement agencies to facilitate closer coordination on law 
enforcement issues with an underlying connection to mental health.

SEC. 3. NUMBER AND AMOUNT OF GRANTS.

    The Attorney General shall award not more than 4 grants each fiscal 
year to community mental health centers (as such term is defined in 
section 1861 of the Social Security Act) in each of the 4 census 
regions. Each such grant shall be in an amount not to exceed $300,000. 
The term of such a grant shall be 3 years. Each such mental health 
center shall partner with a law enforcement agency that employs not 
more than 100 officers in order to carry out the purposes of the grant.

SEC. 4. ELIGIBILITY FOR PLACEMENT WITH A LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY.

    To be eligible for placement with a law enforcement agency under 
this Act, a social worker shall be--
            (1) licensed under the applicable State law; and
            (2) employed by a community mental health center.

SEC. 5. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this Act 
$2,500,000 for fiscal years 2024, 2025, and 2026.

SEC. 6. TERMINATION OF PROGRAM; REPORT TO CONGRESS.

    This Act is repealed on the date that is 3 years after a grant is 
first made under this Act. The Attorney General shall report to 
Congress not later than six months thereafter on the outcomes of any 
cases where the social worker became involved and the total number of 
such cases, and any other information deemed relevant.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 62 (Friday, March 31, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 16665]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7927]



[[Page 16665]]

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION

[Finance Docket No. 32675]


Hartwell Railroad Company--Acquisition and Operation Exemption--
Line of Norfolk Southern Railway Company

    Hartwell Railroad Company (HRC), a noncarrier, has filed a notice 
of exemption to acquire and operate approximately 48.3-miles of rail 
line, the Toccoa Line, owned by Norfolk Southern Railway Company.<SUP>2 
The line extends from milepost P 0.5, near Toccoa, to milepost P 48.80, 
near Elberton, in Elbert, Franklin, Hart, and Stephens Counties, GA. 
The proposed transaction is to be consummated after the effective date 
of the notice of exemption and will result in HRC becoming a class III 
carrier.<SUP>3

    \2\ In a concurrently filed notice of exemption, Great Walton 
Railroad Company, Inc. d/b/a Hartwell Railroad Company--Trackage 
Rights Exemption--Hartwell Railroad Company, Finance Docket No. 
32676, HRC agrees to grant local and overhead trackage rights over 
the Toccoa Line to Great Walton Railroad Company, Inc., an 
unaffiliated carrier, because HRC assertedly will not be prepared to 
provide immediate service to the line's shippers.
    \3\ Under 49 CFR 1150.32(b), the notice of exemption is 
effective 7 days after it is filed. The notice was filed on March 
15, 1995.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Any comments must be filed with the Commission and served on: 
William A. Mullins, Troutman Sanders, 601 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W., 
Washington, DC 20004.
    This notice is filed under 49 CFR 1150.31. If the notice contains 
false or misleading information, the exemption is void ab initio. 
Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10505(d) may be filed 
at any time. The filing of a petition to revoke will not automatically 
stay the transaction.

    Decided: March 24, 1995.

    By the Commission, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-7927 Filed 3-30-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7035-01-P
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6381

Dallas Airmotive, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
#### Charles W. RODNEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 47912.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Feb. 1, 1994.

Patricia A. Richter, Asst. Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before SMART, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and FENNER, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from the denial of a Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6329

CW Bearing USA, Inc:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
1... This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 960567, styled The State of Texas v. Victor Ray, pending in the

County Court at Law No. 7, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Monica Guerrero presiding.

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-08-00814-CR

IN RE Victor RAY

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Alma L. López, Chief Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 10, 2008

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On November 4, 2008, relator Victor Ray filed a petition for writ of mandamus, complaining

of the trial court’s failure to rule on various motions. Counsel has been appointed to represent relator

in the trial court. We conclude that relator’s appointed counsel in the trial court is also his counsel

for an original proceeding on the issue presented.

To obtain mandamus relief in a criminal matter, the relator must establish: (1) the act sought

to be compelled is ministerial rather than discretionary in nature, and (2) there is no adequate remedy

at law. Deleon v. District Clerk, 187 S.W.3d 473, 474 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Respondent has no

ministerial duty to rule on relator’s pro se motions because relator is represented by appointed
04-08-00814-CR

-2-

counsel and is not entitled to hybrid representation. See Robinson v. State, 240 S.W.3d 919, 922

(Tex. Crim. App. 2007); Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995).

Consequently, the respondent did not violate a ministerial duty by declining to rule on relator’s

motions. Therefore, this court has determined that relator is not entitled to the relief sought.

Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied. TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6604 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JOSEPH ZIADEH, Defendant - Appellant.
No. 05-7512 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JOSEPH ZIADEH, Defendant - Appellant.
No. 06-6095 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,- 2 - versus JOSEPH ZIADEH, Defendant - Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CR-02-273) Submitted: March 31, 2006 Decided: April 19, 2006 Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph Ziadeh, Appellant Pro Se. Gurney Wingate Grant, II, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 3 - PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Joseph Ziadeh appeals a district court’s orders (1) denying his motion for temporary injunction and/or in the alternative motion to stay execution of judgment; (2) holding him in civil contempt; and (3) denying his various subsequent motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. SeeUnited States v. Ziadeh , No. CR-02-273 (E.D. Va. Mar. 28, 2005; filed June 23, 2005, and entered June 24, 2005; Dec. 22, 2005). We further deny Ziadeh’s motion in No. 05- 7512 to vacate the contempt order and deny as unnecessary his petition for certificate of appealability filed in No. 05-6604. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-7046

General Motors:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-0 7 -00 677 -CR Tr ac y Eug e ne Ri c ke r so n , A ppe lla nt

v . The State of Texas, App ellee F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF WI LLIAM SO N COUNTY , 277TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 07- 478- K2 77 , HO NORAB LE KEN ANDERSO N , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

ME MO R

A ND UMO PI N I O N Trac y Eug ene Ricke rson see ks to appea l a judg ment of convic tion for driving while intox icated. T he trial c ourt has ce rtified that: (1) this is a plea barg ain case and Ricker son has no right of appe al, and ( 2) Ricker son waived his right of appeal. The appeal is di smissed. See Tex. R. App. P . 25.2(a) (2), ( d).

_________________________ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___________ G. Alan Waldrop, Just ice Be fore Chief Justice L aw, Justi ces Waldrop a nd Henson Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction Filed: January

18, 2008 Do No t Pu

bli sh
N O

. 03

- 14

- 00658

- CV



## In the Court of Appeals

**for the Third Judicial District**

**Austin, Texas**

**___________________________________________________**

ROBYN N. JONES,

Appellant,

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.

Appellee.

On Appeal from the 428th Judicial District Court,

Cause No. 11-0479

N OTICE OF A PPEARANCE OF A DDITIONAL C OUNSEL

FOR W ELLS F ARGO B ANK

, N.A.

Appellee Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. hereby notifies the Court of the

appearance of W. Scott Hastings as additional counsel for Wells Fargo in the

above

- captioned case. Mr. Hastings’ contact information is:

W. Scott Hastings

State Bar No. 24002241

shastings@lockelord.com

LOCKE LORD LLP

2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 2200

Dallas, Texas 75201

- 6776

(214) 740

- 8000

(214) 740

- 8800 (fax ) ACCEPTED

03-14-00658-CV

3691133

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

1/8/2015 9:12:01 AM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERKRespectfully submitted,

/s/ W. Scott Hastings

B. David L. Foster

dfoster@lockelord.com

State Bar No. 24031555

Ryan D. V. Greene

rgreene@lockelord.com

State Bar No. 24012730

600 Congress Avenue, Suite 2200

Austin, Texas 78701

Telephone: (512) 305

- 4700

Facsimile: (512) 305

- 4800

W. Scott Hastings

shastings@lockelord.com

State Bar No. 24002241

Robert T. Mowrey

rmowrey@lockelord.com

State Bar No. 14607500

2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 2200

Dallas, Texas 75201

Telephone: (214) 740

- 8000

Facsimile: (214) 740

- 8800

Counsel for Appellee Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

C ERTIFICATE OF S ERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served on the

following counsel of record by the CM/ECF system or, if any counsel is not

registered, by United States mail on this the 8th day of January, 2015:

Doug W. Ray

Ray & Wood

2700 Bee Caves Road

Austin, Texas 78746

/s/ W. Scott Hastings

W. Scott Hastings

2
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6908

National Electrical Manufacturers Association: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice published at 

83 FR 67463 (‘the exclusion notice’) and posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/2018-28277.pdf.

The scope of your exclusion is governed by the scope of the formal HTSUS product 

description in the Annex to the exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in 

any particular request for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted 

by excluding from the additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description 

contained in the Annex to the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 January 31, 2014

p0127

Order 

Clerk

January 31, 2014

147854

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147854

COA: 313235

Saginaw CC: 10-034184-FC

DAVID WAYNE KETCHUM, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 4, 2013 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Universal Truckload Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the thirteen weeks ended April 1,
2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Donald B. Cochran, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Robert E. Sigler, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, respectively, that (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 5, 2006



/s/ Donald B. CochranDonald B. CochranPresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Robert E. SiglerRobert E. SiglerVice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not
being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS 

### OFFIO!@\lso3lLlSi8HiA8@)LST^TioN^^i^ 

# STATEOFTEXAS °w PENALTY FOR ..' PRIVATE USE MS E83.iP>OSTAGE» PITNEYBOWES 5/15/2015 •::., . - « 

# LOCK, DANIELROBERT Tr. Ct. No. 97-780-K277%'^ 

# On this day, the application for 11.07 Writ,of Habfe^QSp^&taas been received and presented to the Court. HOUSTON, TX 77002 N3B 77002 ZIP 78701 02 1W 0001401623 MAY. 20. 2015 

### WR-83,294-01 

### *& 

# fyfyfibeilAcosta, Clerk TDC#811059 \

vv'-
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 73 (Monday, April 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 19267]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9310]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Meeting of 
National Advisory Environmental Health Sciences Council

    Pursuant to Pub. L. 92-463, notice is hereby given of the meeting 
of the National Advisory Environmental Health Sciences Council, May 22-
23, 1995, in Building 31C, Conference Room 10, National Institutes of 
Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.
    This meeting will be open to the public on May 22 from 9 a.m. to 
approximately 3:30 p.m. for the report of the Director, NIEHS, and for 
discussion of the NIEHS budget, program policies and issues, recent 
legislation, and other items of interest. Attendance by the public will 
be limited to space available.
    In accordance with the provisions set forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 
552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. and sec. 10(d) of Pub. L. 92-463, the 
meeting will be closed to the public on May 22 from approximately 3:30 
p.m. to recess and from 9 a.m. to adjournment on May 23, for the 
review, discussion and evaluation of individual grant applications.
    These applications and the discussions could reveal confidential 
trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    Kim Whitcher, Council Secretary, NIEHS, P.O. Box 12233, Research 
Triangle Park, N.C. 27709 (919-541-7723), will provide summaries of the 
meeting and rosters of council members. Individuals who plan to attend 
and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or 
other reasonable accommodations, should contact Ms. Whitcher in advance 
of the meeting.
    Dr. Anne Sassaman, Director & Executive Secretary, Division of 
Extramural Research and Training, NIEHS, P.O. Box 12233, Research 
Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, (919) 541-7723, will furnish 
substantive program information.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.113, 
Biological Response to Environmental Agents; 93.114, Applied 
Toxicological Research and Testing; 93.115, Biometry and Risk 
Estimation; 93.894, Resource and Manpower Development, National 
Institutes of Health)

    Dated: April 11, 1995.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 95-9310 Filed 4-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
The path of the x ray : 

1. The x ray produced by tungsten target in bombard more of high-speed electron beam from cathode.

2. x ray pass through the BE piece (0.8mm).

3. x ray pass through the GLASS (1.5mm).

4. x ray pass through the OIL (12mm).

5. x ray pass through the PEEK (3mm).