alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7104

ECM Industries LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Exhibit 23











               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



We have issued our report dated January 25, 2002, except for note 19 as to which
the date is February 19, 2002, accompanying the consolidated financial
statements included in the Annual Report of FLAG Financial Corporation on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001. We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statement of FLAG
Financial Corporation on Form S-8, effective April 25, 1994, and as amended by
Amendment No. 1 thereto, effective July 25, 2000 (File No. 33-78230).



                                                    /s/ Porter Keadle Moore, LLP
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                        PORTER KEADLE MOORE, LLP


Atlanta, Georgia
March 28, 2002
Exhibit 32.2

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Killbuck Bancshares, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Diane Knowles, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Diane S. Knowles   
|    |  | Diane S. Knowles       
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer
|    |  | August 12, 2009        

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Killbuck Bancshares,
Inc. and will be retained by Killbuck Bancshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 99.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ENACTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Killbuck Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period endingMarch 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Luther E. Proper, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,; and                              |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |
|   | (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

 

| By:    | /s/ LUTHER E. PROPER                                           |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                                                |   |
|   | **Luther E. Proper Chief Executive Officer**

**May 13, 2003** |   |

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to KillbuckBancshares, Inc. and will be retained by Killbuck Bancshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 74 (Tuesday, April 18, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 19463]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9653]





                Sunshine Act Meetings



Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 74 / Tuesday, April 18, 1995 / 
Sunshine Act Meetings
[[Page 19463]] 




FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Tuesday, April 18, 1995.

PLACE: Room 600, 1730 K Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider and act upon the 
following:

    1. Joy Technologies, Docket No. WEST 93-129. (Issues include 
whether a vendor of mining equipment may be cited as an independent 
contractor-operator based on the actions of its service 
representative.)
    2. Lakeview Rock Products, Inc., Docket Nos. WEVA 94-308-M et 
seq. (Issues include consideration of the operator's request for a 
30 day extension of time to file a petition for discretionary 
review.)
    No earlier announcement of the meeting was possible. Any person 
attending the open portion of this meeting who requires special 
accessibility features and/or auxiliary aides, such as sign language 
interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. 
Subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and 2706.160(e).

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean Ellen, (202) 653-5629/(202) 
708-9300 for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

[FR Doc. 95-9653 Filed 4-14-95; 1:57 pm]

BILLING CODE 6735-01-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5986

Peabody Energy Corporation:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-7340

FS-Elliott Co., LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Dana RUFF, Appellant. Dana RUFF, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 61774.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.

June 14, 1994.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 28, 1994.

John A. Klosterman, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Becky Owenson Kilpatrick, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before GARY M. GAERTNER, C.J., and PUDLOWSKI and SIMON, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Dana Ruff, appeals her jury conviction for two counts of second degree murder in violation of RSMo § 565.021 and two counts of armed criminal action in violation of RSMo § 571.015 in the Circuit Court of St. Louis County. Appellant also appeals the denial of her Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs and arguments of the parties, as well as the transcripts and the legal file, and find no clear error in the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the trial court. In addition, we find that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We, therefore, affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rules 84.16(b) and 30.25(b). The parties have been provided with a memorandum, solely for their own information, setting forth the reasons for our decision.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 26, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-6500

Alo Tennessee Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Mothers Work, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2005 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Edward M. Krell, Executive Vice President—Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ EDWARD  M. KRELL                               |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Edward M. Krell                                         |
| *Executive Vice President—Chief Financial Officer* |
| December 13, 2005                                  |

 

----
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

PAUL IFEJEH, AKA Mr. P, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 18-50105 

D.C. No. 

2:07-cr-01402-SJO-18 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

S. James Otero, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 5, 2020**

Pasadena, California

Before: NGUYEN, HURWITZ, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Paul Ifejeh appeals the sentence imposed after he pleaded guilty to conspiracy 

to commit mail and wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 1341, and 1343. 

Ifejeh was sentenced to three years in prison and three years of supervised release; 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAR 9 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 

he was also ordered to pay $1,201,166.33 in restitution. We affirm in part, vacate in 

part, and remand. 

1. The district court did not clearly err in ordering Ifejeh to pay 

$1,201,166.33 in restitution. See United States v. Peterson, 538 F.3d 1064, 1074

(9th Cir. 2008) (stating standard of review).1 The court was required to award 

restitution to “any person directly harmed by the defendant’s criminal conduct in the 

course of the scheme, conspiracy, or pattern.” 18 U.S.C. § 3663A(a)(2). The district 

court reasonably found that Ifejeh was responsible for victim losses on or after 

August 3, 2005, and it adopted the presentence report’s undisputed calculation of 

those losses. See United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1085 (9th Cir. 2005) (en 

banc) (“[T]he district court may rely on undisputed statements in the PSR at 

sentencing.”). No further factfinding was required. See Peterson, 538 F.3d at 1077. 

2. As the government concedes, the district court erred in imposing 

conditions of supervised release five, six, and fourteen. See United States v. Evans,

883 F.3d 1154, 1162–64 (9th Cir. 2018). We vacate those conditions and remand to 

allow the court to impose any alternative conditions it deems appropriate. See 

United States v. Ped, 943 F.3d 427, 434 (9th Cir. 2019).2

1 We assume without deciding that Ifejeh preserved his challenge to the 

restitution order.

2 The government’s motion to strike portions of Ifejeh’s opening brief and 

excerpts of record, Dkt. 37, is granted. Ifejeh’s motion to supplement the record, 
3 

AFFIRMED in part, VACATED in part, and REMANDED. 

Dkt. 43, is denied. Ifejeh’s unopposed motion for leave to file under seal, Dkt. 46, 

is granted.
##### 



AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT FOR ROBERT C. BOUCHER, JR.
 Amendment
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 NOW, THEREFORE
 Amendments to Employment Contract
 1.
    
    The parties hereby agree to amend Section 1 Employment in its
entirety to read as follows:
 Section 4
 2.
    
    The parties hereby agree to amend Section 2 Compensation in part as
follows:
  3.
    
    The parties hereby agree to amend Section 3 Duties and Responsibilities
of Executive in its entirety to read as follows:
  1




---



##### 



Section 3
 4.
    
    The parties hereby agree to amend Section 4 Term of Employment in
part as follows:
  5.
    
    The parties hereby agree to amend Section 6 Rights and Payments upon
Termination in part as follows:
 Severance Payment except Section 2 Section 6(b) Section 6(b)
 2




---



##### 



Section 9
 6.
    
    To achieve the goals and objectives set out in the Recitals, which are
incorporated into this Agreement as though more fully set forth in this Section,
Synagro and Executive agree that for so long as Executive remains employed by Synagro
and for thirty-days thereafter, in the event that:
 (i)
    
    Executives employment hereunder is terminated by the
Company at any time for any reason except(A) for Cause or (B)
Executives death or Disability;(ii)
    
    Executive terminates his own employment hereunder at
any time for Good Reason; or(iii)
    
    a Change of Control (not otherwise waived pursuant to
this Agreement) occurs
  3




---



##### 



Ratification
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 SYNAGRO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware corporationBy:
    /s/ ALVIN L. THOMASAlvin L. Thomas /s/ ROBERT C. BOUCHER, JR.Robert C. Boucher, Jr., 4
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7196

Omron Management Center of America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5336 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5336

To prohibit the Secretary of Health and Human Services from finalizing 
 a rule proposed by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services with 
   respect to the determination of whether an individual is lawfully 
 present in the United States for purposes of the eligibility of such 
    individual for enrollment in certain health insurance programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 1, 2023

 Mr. Pfluger introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 
   Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the Secretary of Health and Human Services from finalizing 
 a rule proposed by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services with 
   respect to the determination of whether an individual is lawfully 
 present in the United States for purposes of the eligibility of such 
    individual for enrollment in certain health insurance programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON FINALIZING PROPOSED RULE.

    The Secretary of Health and Human Services may not finalize, 
implement, or enforce the proposed rule issued by the Centers for 
Medicare & Medicaid Services titled ``Clarifying Eligibility for a 
Qualified Health Plan Through an Exchange, Advance Payments of the 
Premium Tax Credit, Cost-Sharing Reductions, a Basic Health Program, 
and for Some Medicaid and Children's Health Insurance Programs'' (88 
Fed. Reg. 25313-25335 (April 26, 2023)) or any substantially similar 
rule.
                                 <all>
```