alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6010

Aisin World Corp. of America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 1997 and the Consolidated Statement
of Income for the Year Ended December 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         2,444
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  6,307
<ALLOWANCES>                                   111
<INVENTORY>                                    3,568
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               14,836
<PP&E>                                         4,887
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,733
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 18,434
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5,020
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       50
<OTHER-SE>                                     13,075
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   18,434
<SALES>                                        22,630
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               22,630
<CGS>                                          12,349
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  12,349
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               15,801
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             551
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,071)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,311)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,760)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 2,729
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (897)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.18)


</TABLE>
#### Byrom *et al.,*trustees, *v.*Riley *et al.*

*No.*3044.

November 25, 1922.

Complaint for land. Before Judge Irwin. Douglas superior court. September 13, 1921..

G. B. Byrom et al., as trustees of the Methodist Protestant Church Colored, at Douglasville, brought suit against Ed. Riley and J. S. Abercrombie, to recover a certain lot of land in the town of Douglasville. The defendant Riley filed no defense; but Abercrombie filed an answer averring that he purchased the land, of which he was in possession, from one Green Barnwell, who was a trustee of the above-named church at the time, and that he paid, him the sum of $100 for 50x200 feet of land off the east side of the lot which was described. Abercrombie built a house upon the land worth about $300, and remained in adverse possession of it for more than seven years from the execution of the deed to him. The jury returned a verdict for the defendants. The plaintiffs made a motion for new trial, which was overruled, and they excepted.

*D. 8. Strickland*and *J. 8. James,*for plaintiffs.

*J. B. Hutcheson,*for defendants.

Hill, J.

1. *“A*writing which upon its face professes to pass title to realty, but which does not do so, either from a want of title in the person making it, or from a defect in the conveyance, but which defines the property purported to be conveyed, is sufficient to constitute color of title. *Street*v. *Collier,*118 *Ga.*470 (45 S. E. 294).” *Turner*v. *Neisler,*141 *Ga.*27 (6) (80 S. E. 461); *Beverly*v. *Burke,*9 *Ga.*440 (2), 443 (54 Am. D. 351).

2. Adverse possession of land, under written evidence of title, foi seven years will give a title by prescription. Civil Code (1910), § 4169.

3. The evidence authorized, if it did not demand, the verdict returned in favor of the defendants,

4. The charges of the court complained of, and the rulings on the admissibility of evidence, do not require a reversal.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices eoneur.*
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Derrick Burts, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The evidence supports the court’s finding, following the remittal hearing (see, *People v Burts,*156 AD2d 1010), that Paula Toms’ in-court identification of defendant was based upon a source independent of any taint from a suggestive photo array. At the time of the crime Ms. Toms viewed defendant for several minutes, face to face, from a short distance. It was a sunny day and nothing obstructed her view. Since Toms’ testimony was sufficient to support defendant’s convictions we need not decide whether the identification testimony at trial of Mr. Young, who was deceased at the time of the hearing, was admissible on the remittal hearing *(see,*CPL 670.10; *cf., People v James,*67 NY2d 662, 664). (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court, Dillon, J.— robbery, first degree.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.
#### Millie M. WILSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

No. 68691.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

April 30, 1996.

Gary E. Brotherton, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General and David G. Brown, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and GRIMM, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of her Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 489 

To provide that the notice titled ‘‘Designating Aliens for Expedited Removal’’ 

shall be given the full force and effect of law, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 24, 2023 

Mr. VAN DREW introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide that the notice titled ‘‘Designating Aliens for 

Expedited Removal’’ shall be given the full force and 

effect of law, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Expedited Removal 

5 Codification Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DESIGNATING ALIENS FOR EXPEDITED REMOVAL. 

7 The notice titled, ‘‘Designating Aliens for Expedited 

8 Removal’’, issued by the Department of Homeland SecuVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:47 Feb 04, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H489.IH H489

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 489 IH

1 rity on July 23, 2019 (84 Fed. Reg. 35409), shall have 

2 the full force and effect of law. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Harold E. Boerman, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was convicted of attempted murder, arson and assault for pushing his wife to the floor of the family barn, causing her to become unconscious, and *972setting fire to the barn. The court properly allowed witnesses to testify to statements made by defendant’s wife after she regained consciousness and escaped from the fire. Given the sudden and dangerous nature of the event, the emotional trauma the victim likely suffered and the brief time between the incident and the statements, the court properly concluded that the statements were spontaneous declarations made while the victim was still under the influence of the excitement precipitated by the event *(see, People v Brown, 70*NY2d 513, 520; *People v Edwards,*47 NY2d 493, 497; *People v Knapp,*139 AD2d 931, *Iv denied*72 NY2d 862; *cf., People v Acomb,*87 AD2d 1, 9-10). On this record we conclude that the verdict was supported by sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence *(see, People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495). The trial court’s evidentiary rulings were proper in all respects, defendant was not deprived of a fair trial, and his sentence is not excessive. None of defendant’s remaining claims requires reversal. (Appeal from judgment of Wayne County Court, Strobridge, J.—attempted murder, second degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Green, Lawton, Davis and Lowery, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 68 (Monday, April 10, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 18170]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8816]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


United States International Trade Commission

[USITC SE-95-08]

TIME AND DATES: April 21, 1995 at 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street S.W., Washington, DC 20436

STATUS:

    1. Agenda for future meeting.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Inv. Nos. 731-TA-726-729 (Preliminary) (Polyvinyl Alcohol 
from China, Japan, Korea, and Taiwan)--briefing and vote.
    5. Outstanding action jackets: None.

    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    By order of the Commission:

    Issued: April 5, 1995.
Donna R. Koehnke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-8816 Filed 4-6-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
IB 

Union Calendar No. 557 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5179 

[Report No. 118–661] 

To require the maintenance of the country of origin markings for imported 

goods produced in the West Bank or Gaza, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 8, 2023 

Ms. TENNEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

SEPTEMBER 10, 2024 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 

House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed 

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 

[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on August 8, 2023] 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5179 RH

A BILL 

To require the maintenance of the country of origin markings 

for imported goods produced in the West Bank or Gaza, 

and for other purposes. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 5179 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Anti-BDS Labeling 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CONTINUATION IN EFFECT OF COUNTRY OF ORIGIN 

7 MARKING POLICY FOR IMPORTED GOODS 

8 PRODUCED IN THE WEST BANK OR GAZA. 

9 The policy of the Government of the United States with 

10 respect to country of origin marking of imported goods pro11 duced in the West Bank or Gaza, notice of which was pub12 lished by U.S. Customs and Border Protection in the Fed13 eral Register on December 23, 2020 (85 Fed. Reg. 83984), 

14 shall remain in effect until repealed by an Act of Congress. 

15 SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS TO RESCIND OR 

16 CHANGE THE COUNTRY OF ORIGIN MARKING 

17 POLICY FOR IMPORTED GOODS PRODUCED IN 

18 THE WEST BANK OR GAZA. 

19 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, none of 

20 the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made 

21 available for the Department of State or U.S. Customs and 

22 Border Protection on or after the date of the enactment of 

23 this Act may be obligated or expended to prepare or promul24 gate any policy; guidance; regulation; notice; or Executive 

25 order or to otherwise implement, administer, or enforce any 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
4 

•HR 5179 RH

1 policy that rescinds or changes the policy of the Government 

2 of the United States with respect to country of origin mark3 ing of imported goods produced in the West Bank or Gaza, 

4 notice of which was published by U.S. Customs and Border 

5 Protection in the Federal Register on December 23, 2020 

6 (85 Fed. Reg. 83984). 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Union Calendar No. 557 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5179 

[Report No. 118–661] 

A BILL 

To require the maintenance of the country of origin 

West Bank or Gaza, and for other purposes. markings for imported goods produced in the 

SEPTEMBER 10, 2024 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Comand ordered to be printed mittee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5073 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow intangible drilling 

and development costs to be taken into account when computing adjusted 

financial statement income. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 28, 2023 

Mr. CAREY (for himself, Mr. VICENTE GONZALEZ of Texas, Mr. NEHLS, Mr. 

HUNT, Mr. MOONEY, Mrs. MILLER of West Virginia, Mr. MEUSER, Mrs. 

BICE, Mr. CRENSHAW, Mr. COLE, Mr. CUELLAR, Ms. VAN DUYNE, Mr. 

PENCE, Mr. TONY GONZALES of Texas, Ms. GREENE of Georgia, Mr. 

AMODEI, Mr. PFLUGER, Mr. ZINKE, Mr. LANGWORTHY, Mr. HERN, Mr. 

ESTES, Mr. BALDERSON, Mr. ARMSTRONG, Mr. MILLER of Ohio, and Mr. 

NEWHOUSE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow intangible drilling and development costs to be taken into 

account when computing adjusted financial statement income. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Promoting Domestic 

5 Energy Production Act’’. 

2 

•HR 5073 IH

1 SEC. 2. INTANGIBLE DRILLING AND DEVELOPMENT COSTS 

2 TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT FOR PURPOSES OF 

3 COMPUTING ADJUSTED FINANCIAL STATE4 MENT INCOME. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 56A(c)(13) of the Inter6 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 

7 (1) by amending subparagraph (A) to read as 

8 follows: 

9 ‘‘(A) reduced by— 

10 ‘‘(i) depreciation deductions allowed 

11 under section 167 with respect to property 

12 to which section 168 applies to the extent 

13 of the amount allowed as deductions in 

14 computing taxable income for the year, 

15 and 

16 ‘‘(ii) any deduction allowed for ex17 penses under section 263(c) with respect to 

18 property described therein to the extent of 

19 the amount allowed as deductions in com20 puting taxable income for the year, and’’, 

21 and 

22 (2) by amending subparagraph (B)(i) to read as 

23 follows: 

24 ‘‘(i) to disregard any amount of— 

25 ‘‘(I) depreciation expense that is 

26 taken into account on the taxpayer’s 

3 

•HR 5073 IH

1 applicable financial statement with re2 spect to such property, and 

3 ‘‘(II) depletion expense that is 

4 taken into account on the taxpayer’s 

5 applicable financial statement with re6 spect to the intangible drilling and de7 velopment costs of such property, 

8 and’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

10 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

11 December 31, 2022. 

Æ
Exhibit 10.1


 


PZENA
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, LLC


AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND
RESTATED OPERATING AGREEMENT


 


This Amendment to the Amended and Restated Operating
Agreement dated as of October 30, 2007, 
(herein called “this Amendment”) is hereby made and executed by Pzena
Investment Management, Inc. as the Managing Member  (the “Managing Member”) of Pzena Investment
Management, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Company”)
established under a restated Operating Agreement dated as of January 3,
1996, and amended by various amendments reflected in the record books of the
Company (as amended, the “Operating Agreement”), and those Class B Members
whose signatures are affixed hereto. Capitalized terms used but not defined
herein have the meanings given to them in the Operating Agreement.


 


WHEREAS, the Managing Member has determined to amend
the notice provision under Section 2.01(b) of Article II of Exhibit B
to the Operating Agreement; and


 


WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 11.01 of the
Operating Agreement, terms and provisions of the Operating Agreement, including
any Exhibit or Schedule thereto, may be modified or amended at any time
and from time to time with the written consent of the Managing Member and a
Majority in Interest of the Class B Members.


 


NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to Section 11.01 of the
Operating Agreement, the Managing Member amends Exhibit B to the Operating
Agreement as follows:


 


Article II, Section 2.01(b) is hereby
amended to replace the notice provision in its entirety with the following:


 


The Managing Member shall provide, in respect of at least one
(1) Exchange Date in each Annual Period, a written notice (an “Exchange Notice”) to all Class B
Members at least fifteen (15) calendar days prior to such Exchange Date.  In respect of any other Exchange Date within
such Annual Period, the Managing Member may provide an Exchange Notice to one
or more Class B Members such number of days prior to such Exchange Date as
the Managing Member may determine in its sole discretion.


 


This Amendment may be executed in one or more
counterparts, and each of such counterparts shall for all purposes be deemed to
be an original.


 

















 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this
Amendment has been duly executed to be effective as of March 24, 2010.


 


 


MANAGING MEMBER:


 


Pzena Investment Management, Inc.


 


	
  /s/ Richard S. Pzena

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  



By: Richard S. Pzena, Chief Executive Officer


 


CLASS B MEMBERS:


 


	
  /s/
  Richard S. Pzena

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Richard
  S. Pzena

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/
  John P. Goetz

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  John
  P. Goetz

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/
  William L. Lipsey

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  William
  L. Lipsey
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7208

United Scope LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_05.09.19.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 73 (Monday, April 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 19329]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9299]



      
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
[AC-21; OTS No. 4312]


Logansport Savings Bank, FSB, Logansport, Indiana; Approval of 
Conversion Application

    Notice is hereby given that on April 5, 1995, the Assistant 
Director, Corporate Activities, Office of Thrift Supervision, or her 
designee, acting pursuant to delegated authority, approved the 
application of Logansport Savings Bank, FSB, Logansport, Indiana, to 
convert to the stock form of organization. Copies of the application 
are available for inspection at the Information Services Division, 
Office of Thrift Supervision, 1700 G Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 
20552, and the Central Regional Office, Office of Thrift Supervision, 
111 Wacker Drive, Suite 800, Chicago, Illinois 60601-4360.

    Dated: April 11, 1995.

    By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Nadine Y. Washington,
Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-9299 Filed 4-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-M