alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 51 (Thursday, March 16, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14301-14302]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6465]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Receipt of Application(s) for Permit

    The following applicant has applied for a permit amendment to 
conduct certain activities with endangered species. This notice is 
provided pursuant to Section 10(c) of the Endangered Species Act of 
1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531, et seq.). [[Page 14302]] 

PRT-799099

Applicant: Dale W. Stahlecker, Santa Fe, New Mexico.

    The applicant requests a permit to include take activities for the 
Southwestern willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus) for the 
purpose of scientific research and enhancement of propagation and 
survival of the species as prescribed by Service recovery documents.
addresses: Written data or comments should be submitted to the 
Assistant Regional Director, Ecological Services, U.S. Fish and 
Wildlife Service, P.O. Box 1306, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87103, and 
must be received by the Assistant Regional Director within 30 days of 
the date of this publication.
    Documents and other information submitted with this application are 
available for review, subject to the requirements of the Privacy Act 
and Freedom of Information Act, by any party who submits a written 
request for a copy of such documents to the above office within 30 days 
of the date of publication of this notice. (See ADDRESSES above.)
James A. Young,
Acting Regional Director, Region 2, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
[FR Doc. 95-6465 Filed 3-15-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 26, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-5218

Bergstrom, Inc: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September_2019.pdf. 

An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the exclusion notice. The scope of the exclusion is governed by the scope of the 10-digit HTSUS 

subheadings and product descriptions in the annex to the product exclusion notice, and not by the 

product descriptions set out in any particular request for exclusion. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7032

United Scope LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_05.09.19.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
Fourth Amendment Directors' Savings Plan



 EXHIBIT 10.1 

FOURTH AMENDMENT 

SPECTRA ENERGY CORP DIRECTORS’ SAVINGS PLAN 

THIS FOURTH AMENDMENT is made this
22nd day of February 2010, by Spectra Energy Corp, a
Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and amends the Spectra Energy Corp Directors’ Savings Plan originally adopted by the Company and effective as of December 18, 2006 (the “Plan”), and as
amended from time to time thereafter, in order to provide for the elimination of the DECS Investment Option. 
 The Plan
is hereby amended, effective as of January 1, 2010, as follows: 

1.    Section 4.4(iii) of the Plan is amended by adding the following new paragraph to the
end thereof: 
 Notwithstanding the above paragraph, any phantom stock units granted under the Duke Energy Corporation
1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan that are credited to a Participant’s Account on or after December 31, 2009 shall be allocated between the following deemed investment options: 

(1) each unit attributable to Company common stock shall automatically be credited, on the basis of the Fair Market Value of a share of
Company common stock as of the date that such unit is paid under the applicable phantom stock unit, as a share of a phantom investment in the Spectra Stock Deferral Investment Option; and 

(2) each unit attributable to Duke common stock shall automatically be allocated, on the basis of the Fair Market Value of a share of
Duke common stock on the date that such unit is paid under the applicable phantom stock unit, to the Participant’s Account among the phantom investment options applicable to future contribution credits as designated in accordance with the
Participant’s investment direction made under Section 4.1, provided, however, if no such investment direction is in effect, then such amounts shall be automatically allocated to the Vanguard Prime Money Market Fund phantom investment
option made available by the Committee pursuant to Section 4.1. 

2.    Section 4.4(iv) of the Plan is amended by adding the following new paragraph to the
end thereof: 
 Effective as of January 1, 2010, the DECS Investment Option shall no longer be
available as an investment option under the Plan, and all amounts allocated thereto as of December 31, 2009 shall be reallocated to the Vanguard Prime Money Market Fund phantom investment option made available by the Committee pursuant to
Section 4.1. 
 As amended hereby, the Plan is hereby ratified and confirmed and shall remain in full force and
effect. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has adopted and executed this Fourth Amendment on
this 23rd day of February, 2010, to be effective as of February 22, 2010. 
  

			
	SPECTRA ENERGY CORP
		
	By:	 	/s/ Dorothy M. Ables
	Name:	 	 Dorothy M. Ables

	Title:	 	 Chief Administrative Officer



 

 2
**EXHIBIT 32.01**

**Section 1350 Certification**

In connection with this Quarterlyreport of ML Aspect FuturesAccess LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the periodended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (this “Report”), I, Robert D. Ollwerther, Chief ExecutiveOfficer and President of Merrill Lynch Alternative Investments LLC, the managerof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.
| Date: November 14, 2007               |                     |
|---------------------------------------|--------------------------|
|                                  |
| By                                    | /s/ ROBERT D. OLLWERTHER |   |
| Robert D. Ollwerther                  |
| Chief Executive Officer and President |
| (Principal Executive Officer)         |
|                                       |                          |  |  |

 

----
LETTER FROM JOHN H. SOTTILE



 Exhibit 10-1 
 John H. Sottile 
 7825 South Tropical Trail 

Merritt Island, FL 32952 

July 12, 2011 
 The Benefits and
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of 
 The Goldfield Corporation 
 Gentlemen, 
 Although Goldfield has experienced improvements in income during 2010, local and
national economic conditions continued to adversely affect our company. Accordingly, I elect to continue my salary reduction through September 30, 2011. 
 This waiver does not otherwise waive any rights I have in my Employment Agreement and is limited to my 2011 salary through September 30, 2011. The formula prescribed by the Employment Contract and
the base figures will remain as determined in the Employment Agreement as though this waiver and the election to decrease my 2011 salary had not been made. Thank you for your continued cooperation. 

Sincerely, 
  

					
	 :
	 	/s/ JOHN H. SOTTILE	  	
	John H. Sottile	  	

 cc: Board of Directors of The Goldfield Corporation
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 72 (Friday, April 14, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 18981]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9208]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

13 CFR Part 121


Small Business Size Regulations; Handicapped Workshop 
Participation in Small Business Set-Aside Contracts; Correction

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Small Business Administration (SBA) is correcting an error 
in the preamble concerning its Small Business Size Regulations; 
Handicapped Workshop Participation in Small Business Set-aside 
Contracts, which appeared in the Federal Register on March 24, 1995 (60 
FR 15477).

EFFECTIVE DATE: This rule is effective on April 14, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary M. Jackson, Assistant 
Administrator for Size Standards, (202) 205-6618.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the second column of the Small Business 
Size Regulations; Handicapped Workshop Participation in Small Business 
Set-aside Contracts, published in the Federal Register on March 24, 
1995 (60 FR 15477), the beginning of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION was 
inadvertently omitted and should be inserted after the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT paragraph as follows:

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 15(a) of the Small Business Act (the 
Act), 15 U.S.C. 644(a), provides Federal agencies the authority to 
reserve Federal contracts exclusively for small business competition. 
Pursuant to section 3(a) of the Act, 15 U.S.C. 632(a), and SBA's size 
regulations found at part 121 of title 13 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR), a concern eligible as a small business for these 
set-aside contracts must be a for-profit concern, independently-owned 
and operated, not dominant in its field of operation, and meet the 
applicable numerical size standard as prescribed under 13 CFR Section 
121.601. The Small Business Administration Reauthorization and 
Amendments Act of 1994 amended Section 15(c) of the Act, 15 U.S.C. 
644(c), by expanding the eligibility of entities which may participate 
in small business set-aside contracts to include public or private 
organizations for the handicapped during fiscal year 1995. See Pub. L. 
103-403, section 305. However, this statutory revision limits the 
extent of participation by public or private handicapped organizations 
in small business set-aside awards to an aggregate amount not to exceed 
$40,000,000. The Act further provides that Federal agencies making 
awards to such organizations pursuant to provisions of this Act may use 
multi-year contracts, if appropriate.

    Dated: April 10, 1995.
Philip Lader,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 95-9208 Filed 4-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-6349

Diebold Nixdorf Incorporated: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
Exhibit
31.1




CERTIFICATION
OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 302


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I,
Richard Man Fai LEE, certify that:




1. 
         I have reviewed this
quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 of
China Premium Lifestyle Enterprise, Inc.




2. 
         Based on my knowledge,
this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report.




3. 
         Based on my knowledge, the
financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report.




4. 
         The registrant’s other
certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




a. 
         designed such disclosure
controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;




b. 
         evaluated the
effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and




c. 
         disclosed in this report
any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s
internal control over financial reporting.




5. 
         The registrant’s other
certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation
of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and
the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):




a. 
         all significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and




b. 
         any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.





Date:
      May 28, 2010
            By:
            /s/
      Richard Man Fai LEERichard
      Man Fai LEEChief
      Executive Officer
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-6666

C&U Americas, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7189

Omron Management Center of America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

375 CA 11-02045 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF MARTIN J. SAWMA, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CHRIS COLLINS, COUNTY EXECUTIVE, COUNTY OF ERIE, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL KUZMA, BUFFALO (MICHAEL KUZMA OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

LIPPES MATHIAS WEXLER FRIEDMAN LLP, BUFFALO (VINCENT M. MIRANDA OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment (denominated decision and order) of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Timothy J. Walker, A.J.), entered December 8, 2010 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The judgment dismissed the petition.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Petitioner appeals from a judgment dismissing his CPLR article 78 petition that sought disclosure of certain records of respondent pursuant to the Freedom of Information Law ([FOIL] Public Officers Law art 6). We agree with Supreme Court that the documents sought are exempt from disclosure pursuant to Public Officers Law § 87 (2) (g) inasmuch as they are inter-agency or intra-agency materials that are not statistical or factual tabulations or data, instructions to staff that affect the public, or final agency policy or determinations. Respondent met his burden of establishing that the documents were part of a government decision-making process that involved the use of consultation, and such predecisional material that an agency decision-maker uses to arrive at a decision is exempt from FOIL disclosure ( see Matter of Xerox Corp. v Town of Webster , 65 NY2d 131; Matter of Bass Pro, Inc. v Megna , 69 AD3d 1040). In light of our determination, we need not address the remaining exemptions under FOIL upon which respondent relies.

Entered: March 16, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court