alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1

Amendment to Original Proposal Contract  Between Cleartronic and Waldman and Associates




Reference is made to the Interim Consulting Proposal dated January 22, 2010 between Cleartronic, Inc.  (the "Company") and Waldman and Associates ("Dana").

Dana currently serves as informal CEO with the following compensation:

·

Monthly consulting fee of $8,000 and $4,000 per month accruing in shares or warrants at Dana's discretion through May 31, 2011.

The agreement is amended as of June 1, 2011 and both parties agree as follows:

·

Dana will now take on the official role of CEO and be elected as a member of the Board of Directors.

·

Monthly consulting fee will now be $12,000 and $4,000 per month accruing in shares or warrants at Dana's discretion through May 31, 2012. The exercise or conversion price of the shares or warrants shall be the average VWAP of the stock for the 30 days prior to the grant date. The “VWAP” shall be defined as the daily Volume Weighted Average Price (“VWAP”), as reported on Bloomberg.

·

the Current Value as defined in the "Cleartronic, Inc. 2011 Incentive Equity Plan" on the last trading day of each month.

·

The company will reimburse actual health insurance premium costs, expected to be approximately $9,000 per quarter.

·

1 year total of all the above is $228,000

·

Special financing arrangements have been secured to fund the payments to Dana for the next 12 months, and those funds will be kept available for 12 full months starting June 1, 2011. These funds will not be used for any other purpose and will be available.

·

If Dana quits for any reason other than for “good reason as defined below, during the 12 months, he keeps the current month’s fees and pro-rated portion of health insurance premiums, and forfeits the rest of the money.

·

If Dana is terminated without cause, or quits for “good reason” during the 12 months, then the balance of the $228,000 is due to him when he leaves.

o

Good reason is defined in his employment contract as loss of title or being essentially demoted.

·

If the company somehow collapses during the 12 months, the balance of the $228,000, is still due to Dana.




Agreed to and Accepted









s/ Larry Reid

Larry Reid

 

Date:7/7/11




Agreed to and Accepted









/s/  Dana Waldman

Dana Waldman

 

Date:7/7/11
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of CEO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of First State Bancorporation, a New
Mexico corporation (the Company), for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael R. Stanford, as President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to First State Bancorporation and will be retained by First
State Bancorporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Michael R. Stanford              
|Michael R. Stanford                  
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|March 16, 2006                       

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**Certification of CFO**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsections (a) and(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**

 

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Gateway, Inc., a Delawarecorporation (“Gateway”), does hereby certify that: 

 

a) The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the “Form 10-K”) of Gateway fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and 

 

b) The information contained in the Form10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Gateway. 

 

Dated: February 23, 2007
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: KAHTAN BAYATI, 

Debtor, 

______________________________ 

KAHTAN BAYATI, 

Appellant, 

 v. 

WILLIAM MUSHARBASH; et al., 

Appellees. 

No. 15-60073 

BAP No. 14-1310 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the Ninth Circuit

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel

Kurtz, Dunn, and Taylor, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding

Submitted April 11, 2017**

Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Kahtan Bayati appeals pro se from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s 

(“BAP”) judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders granting Town Square 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

APR 24 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 15-60073 

M Properties LLC’s motion for relief from the automatic stay and denying Bayati’s 

motion for reconsideration. We review de novo the question of mootness. Suter v. 

Goedert, 504 F.3d 982, 985 (9th Cir. 2007). We dismiss.

During the pendency of this appeal, the bankruptcy court entered an order 

dismissing Bayati’s bankruptcy case, which Bayati appealed to the BAP. The BAP 

affirmed the bankruptcy court’s dismissal order and Bayati did not appeal the 

BAP’s judgment. We dismiss this appeal as moot because there is no longer any 

case or controversy and we lack power to grant any effective relief. See 11 U.S.C. 

§ 362(c)(2)(B); Castaic Partners II, LLC v. Daca-Castaic, LLC (In re Castaic 

Partners II, LLC), 823 F.3d 966, 969 (9th Cir. 2016) (“In a bankruptcy appeal, 

when the underlying bankruptcy case is dismissed and that dismissal is allowed to 

become final, there is likely no longer any case or controversy . . . .”); Armel 

Laminates, Inc. v. Lomas & Nettleton Co. (In re Income Prop. Builders, Inc.), 699 

F.2d 963, 964 (9th Cir. 1982) (“Once the bankruptcy was dismissed, a bankruptcy 

court no longer had power to order the stay or to award damages allegedly 

attributable to its vacation. A remand by us to the bankruptcy court would 

therefore be useless.”).

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued 

in the opening brief. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

Bayati’s motion “to submit highlights of the oral argument in a short written 
3 15-60073 

form” (Docket Entry No. 26) is denied.

DISMISSED.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 64 (Tuesday, April 4, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 17023]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8162]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 89-459; RM-7009, RM-7260, RM-7261, RM-7263, RM-7264]


Radio Broadcasting Services; LaGrange and Rollingwood, TX

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document denies an Application for Review filed by 
Fayette Broadcasting Corporation, licensee of Station KBUK, Channel 
285A, LaGrange, Texas, directed to a staff action denying its request 
to substitute Channel 285C2 for Channel 285A and reallot Channel 285C2 
to Rollingwood, Texas. See 58 FR 12903, published March 8, 1993. With 
this action, the proceeding is terminated.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 4, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Hayne, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 
776-1654.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Memorandum Opinion and Order, MM Docket No. 89-459, adopted March 8, 
1995, and released March 28, 1995. The full text of this decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Dockets Branch (Room 230), 1919 M Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 
The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription service, 
(202) 857-3800, 2100 M Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20037.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

    Authority: Secs. 303, 48 Stat., as amended, 1082; 47 U.S.C. 154, 
as amended.

Federal Communications Commission.
William F. Caton,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-8162 Filed 4-3-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Universal Truckload Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the thirteen weeks ended
September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Donald B. Cochran, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Robert E. Sigler, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, respectively, that (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 13, 2006



/s/ Donald B. CochranDonald B. CochranPresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Robert E. SiglerRobert E. SiglerVice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and
Treasurer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not
being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 26, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-6475

Alo Tennessee Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

April 12, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6558

Apex Sourcing & Manufacturing: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_04.15.19.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 72 (Friday, April 14, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 19034]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9268]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Office of Fossil Energy
[FE Docket No. 95-15-NG]


Renaissance Energy (U.S.) Inc.; Order Granting Long-Term 
Authorization to Import Natural Gas From Canada

AGENCY: Office of Fossil Energy, DOE.

ACTION: Notice of order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of Fossil Energy of the Department of Energy gives 
notice that it has issued an order granting Renaissance Energy (U.S.) 
Inc. authorization to import up to 2,800 Mcf per day of Canadian 
natural gas from the date of the authorization until November 1, 2004.
    This order is available for inspection and copying in the Office of 
Fuels Programs Docket Room, 3F-056, Forrestal Building, 1000 
Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20585, (202) 586-9478. The 
docket room is open between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., 
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

    Issued in Washington, D.C., March 30, 1995.
Clifford P. Tomaszewski,
Director, Office of Natural Gas, Office of Fuels Programs, Office of 
Fossil Energy.
[FR Doc. 95-9268 Filed 4-13-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-5762

Alo USA Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5758

Omron Management Center of America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7156

Global Trade Works, LLC:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
ACCEPTED 01-14-00845-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS 7/6/2015 4:20:28 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6835

Omron Management Center of America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-6324

PEER Bearing Company:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel