16608 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 1995 / Notices

[A–427–801]

Antifriction Bearings (Other Than

Tapered Roller Bearings) and Parts

Thereof From France; Amendment to

Final Results of Antidumping Duty

Administrative Reviews and Recision

of Partial Revocation of Antidumping

Duty Order

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of amendment to final

results of antidumping duty

administrative reviews and recision of

partial revocation of Antidumping Duty

Order.

SUMMARY: On February 28, 1995, the

Department of Commerce (the

Department) published in the Federal

Register (60 FR 10959) the final results

of its administrative reviews of the

antidumping duty orders on antifriction

bearings (other than tapered roller

bearings) and parts thereof (AFBs) from

France, Germany, Japan, Singapore,

Sweden, Thailand, and the United

Kingdom. The classes or kinds of

merchandise covered by these reviews

are ball bearings and parts thereof (BBs),

cylindrical roller bearings and parts

thereof (CRBs), and spherical plain

bearings and parts thereof (SPBs). The

review period was May 1, 1992, through

April 30, 1993. Based on corrections to

the calculation of United States price

(USP), we are amending the final results

with respect to French BBs and SPBs

sold by one company, SKF France

(SKF).

We are also rescinding the revocation

of the antidumping duty order on SPBs

from France with respect to SKF, since

the dumping margin is no longer de

minimis.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 31, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Matthew Rosenbaum or Michael Rill,

Office of Antidumping Compliance,

Import Administration, International

Trade Administration, U.S. Department

of Commerce, 14th Street and

Constitution Avenue, N.W.,

Washington, DC 20230; telephone

(202)482–4733.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

On February 28, 1995, the Department

published in the Federal Register the

final results of its administrative

reviews of the antidumping duty orders

on AFBs from France, Germany, Japan,

Singapore, Sweden, Thailand, and the

United Kingdom. The classes or kinds of

merchandise covered by these reviews

are BBs, CRBs, and SPBs. The review

period was May 1, 1992, through April

30, 1993.

In these final results, we revoked in

part the antidumping duty order on

SPBs from France with respect to SKF

based on three consecutive years of zero

or de minimis weighted- average

dumping margins in accordance with 19

CFR 353.25(a).

Subsequent to the issuance of our

final results, the Torrington Company

(Torrington), the petitioner, alleged a

clerical error in the calculation of

dumping margins for SKF with respect

to BBs and SPBs from France. We

determined there was a ministerial error

in the calculation of USP in the final

results for AFBs from France sold by

SKF. Specifically, purchase price sales

made by SKF were reported in French

francs, and we failed to convert these

prices to U.S. dollars. We have therefore

corrected our calculation of SKF’s USP.

Recision of Revocation

After correction of this ministerial

error, we found that the weightedaverage margin for SPBs from France

sold by SKF no longer is de minimis.

Therefore, the criteria for partial

revocation pursuant to 19 CFR 353.25(a)

have not been met, and we hereby

rescind the partial revocation of the

antidumping duty order on SPBs from

France with respect to SKF.

Amended Final Results of Reviews

As a result of our corrections, we have

determined the following percentage

weighted-average margins to exist for

the period May 1, 1992 through April

30, 1993:

Company BBs SPBs

SKF ............................... 3.74 49.08

Based on these results, we will direct

the Customs Service to collect cash

deposits of estimated antidumping

duties on all appropriate entries in

accordance with the procedures

discussed in the final results of these

reviews.

These deposit requirements are

effective for all shipments of the subject

merchandise entered, or withdrawn

from warehouse, for consumption on or

after the date of publication of this

notice and shall remain in effect until

publication of the final results of the

next administrative reviews.

This notice also serves as a reminder

to importers of their responsibility

under 19 CFR 353.26 to file a certificate

regarding the reimbursement of

antidumping duties prior to liquidation

of the relevant entries during this

review period. Failure to comply with

this requirement could result in the

Secretary’s presumption that

reimbursement of antidumping duties

occurred and the subsequent assessment

of double antidumping duties.

This notice is published in

accordance with section 751(f) of the

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19

U.S.C. 1675(f)) and 19 CFR 353.28(c).

Dated: March 23, 1995.

Susan G. Esserman,

Assistant Secretary for Import

Administration.

[FR Doc. 95–8011 Filed 3–30–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

[A–588–834]

Final Determination of Sales at Less

Than Fair Value: Antidumping Duty

Investigation of Stainless Steel Angle

From Japan

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 31, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

James Maeder or Bill Crow, Office of

Antidumping Investigations, Import

Administration, U.S. Department of

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;

telephone (202) 482–3330 or 482–0116,

respectively.

Final Determination

We determine that stainless steel

angle (SSA) from Japan is being sold in

the United States at less than fair value,

as provided in section 735 of the Tariff

Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’).

The estimated margins are shown in the

‘‘Suspension of Liquidation’’ section of

this notice.

Case History

Since the preliminary determination

of sales at less than fair value in this

investigation on November 4, 1994 (59

FR 56053, November 10, 1994), the

following events have occurred.

On November 23, 1994, the

petitioners alleged that the preliminary

margin calculations contained three

distinct ministerial errors. As detailed

in the December 8, 1994, memorandum

to Barbara R. Stafford, the Department

agreed that the errors identified by the

petitioners were ministerial in nature,

but did not amend the preliminary

determination because these errors were

not significant, as defined in the

Proposed Regulations (19 CFR

353.15(g)(4)(ii)).

In December 1994, the Department

conducted its sales and cost