alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             273
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,961
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,704
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,664
<PP&E>                                             582
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,035
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,529
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            94
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,284
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,035
<SALES>                                         17,439
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,439
<CGS>                                           12,566
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,566
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,847
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 418
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,608
<INCOME-TAX>                                        36
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,572
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,572
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .017
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .015


</TABLE>
#### Richard BRADLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 50694.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Oct. 24, 1995.

Rosalynn Koch, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Christine M. Kocot, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before LAURA DENVIR STITH, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and HANNA, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Richard Bradley appeals denial without ev-identiary hearing of his motion pursuant to Rule 24.035.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION



I, Joseph T. Drennan, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Universal Capital Management, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                  |  |     |                             | 
|----------------- |  | --- | --------------------------- | 
|December 18, 2007 |  | By: | /s/ Joseph T. Drennan       | 
|                  |  |     | Joseph T. Drennan           | 
|                  |  |     | Principal Financial Officer
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23
- 6833

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. TERRANCE LAMAR WIGGINS, a/k/a T

- Wig, a/k/a Barnwell , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Aiken

. Cameron McGow a n Currie , Senior District Judge. ( 1:12

- cr - 00333

- CMC

- 1 )

Submitted : March 28 , 2024 Decided: April 2, 2024

Before KING and RUSHING , Circuit Judges , and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge

.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Terrance Lamar Wiggins, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-6833 Doc: 12 Filed: 04/02/2024 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Terrance Lamar Wiggins appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for compassionate release , brought pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), as amended by the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115

- 391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239

. After reviewing the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Wiggins’ motion. See United States v. Brown , 78 F.4th 122, 127 (4th Cir. 2023) (stating standard of review )

. Accordingly, we affirm the district court ’ s ord er
. United
States v. Wiggins , No. 1:12

- cr - 00333

- CMC

- 1 (D.S.C. July 25, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 23-6833 Doc: 12 Filed: 04/02/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6183

Dallas Airmotive, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
#### Darrell PERRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 49604.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

March 21, 1995.

Rosalynn Koch, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before SPINDEN, P.J., and ULRICH and SMART, JJ.

*273ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Darrell Perry appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-2026

CHARLES OGBAEGBE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

HAMPTON UNIVERSITY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Newport News. Tommy E. Miller, Magistrate

Judge. (CA-04-25-4)

Submitted: June 30, 2005 Decided: July 19, 2005

Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Austin Goman, Detroit, Michigan, for Appellant. Laura G. Fox,

LAURA G. FOX, PLLC, Warrenton, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*

This case was decided by the magistrate judge upon consent of

the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1) (2000).

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Charles I. Ogbaegbe appeals the magistrate judge’s order

granting the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment.*

 We review

de novo a district court’s order granting summary judgment and view

the facts in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party.

Price v. Thompson, 380 F.3d 209, 212 (4th Cir. 2004). Summary

judgment is appropriate when no genuine issue of material fact

exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of

law. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c); United States Dep’t of Labor v.

N.C. Growers Ass’n, 377 F.3d 345, 350 (4th Cir. 2004). Summary

judgment will be granted unless a reasonable jury could return a

verdict for the nonmoving party on the evidence presented.

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 251-52 (1986).

To the extent Ogbaegbe alleges educational malpractice,

that is not a cognizable cause of action in Virginia. See

Sellers v. School Bd. of the City of Manassas, 960 F. Supp. 1006,

1012 (E.D. Va. 1997), aff’d, 141 F.3d 524 (4th Cir. 1998).

Furthermore, no genuine issue of material fact exists to inhibit

summary judgment on the breach of contract allegation. Finally,

Ogbaegbe’s statutory claims are barred by the applicable statute of

limitations, as neither he nor his agent, attorney or

representative “commenced such action or . . . filed by registered
- 3 -

mail a written statement of the nature of the claim with the

potential defendant or defendants within 180 days of the occurrence

of the alleged violation.” Va. Code Ann. § 51.6-45(B) (Michie

2000).

Accordingly, we affirm the order of the magistrate judge.

AFFIRMED
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7311

TI Group Automotive Systems, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests. 

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

SAMUEL W. HUDSON III,

 Appellant,

v.

MARY LOIS SWEATT,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

No. 08-12-00334-CV

Appeal from the

116th District Court 

of Dallas County, Texas 

(TC# 10-03202-F)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellee 

recover from Appellant and his sureties, if any, see TEX. R. APP. P. 43.5, on the judgment and all 

costs, for which let execution issue. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 21ST DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2014.

SUSAN LARSEN, Justice (Senior Judge)

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, J., and Larsen, J. (Senior Judge)

Larsen, J. (Senior Judge), sitting by assignment
SECTION

 PAGE 

 DATE

A Crane Co. Company USA: (937) 778-8947 • Canada: (905) 457-6223 • International: (937) 615-3598

Sump & Utility Pumps

1

A

www.cranepumps.com

Professional Plumbing

1/17

Series SU

Automatic 

Submersible Sump

DISCHARGE ...............................11⁄2” NPT, Female, Vertical

LIQUID TEMPERATURE .............104°F (40°C) Continuous

MOTOR HOUSING ......................Cast Iron

PUMP BODY, STRAINER, IMPELLER: 

......................................................Thermoplastic

SHAFT ........................................Steel

O-RINGS ...............................Buna-N

HARDWARE ................................300 Series Stainless Steel

PAINT ........................................... Air Dry Enamel

SEAL: Design ....................Single Mechanical, Type 11A 

Material ...................Carbon/Ceramic/Buna-N

Hardware ................ 300 Series Stainless

CORD ENTRY ..............................9 ft. (2.7m) Cord with plug and

Pressure Gromment for sealing and strain 

 relief

BEARINGS ................................Single Row, Ball, Oil Lubricated 

MOTOR: Design ....................Oil Filled

Insulation.................Class B

SINGLE PHASE ...........................Permanent Split Capacitor (PSC). 

 Includes thermal overload protection in 

 motor

LEVEL CONTROL .......................Vertical Float Integral to Pump

MINIMUM SUMP DIA ...................14" ( 355mm)

NOTE ............................................GFCI Compatible to Comply with NEC 

 210.8 (A)

Series: SU33

1/3HP, 3450RPM, 60Hz

DESCRIPTION:

PUMP FOR RESIDENTIAL SUMP APPLICATIONS

Testing is performed with 

water specifi c gravity of 1.0 

@ 68 ̊F (20 ̊C), other fl uids 

may vary performance

CSA 108

UL 778

LR16567

C US

This product may be covered by one 

or more of the following patents and 

other patent(s) pending:

US Patent 8,167,578
 SECTION

 PAGE

 DATE

Sump & Utility Pumps

A Crane Co. Company USA: (937) 778-8947 • Canada: (905) 457-6223 • International: (937) 615-3598

2

A

www.cranepumps.com

Professional Plumbing

1/17

Series SU

Automatic

Submersible Sump

MODEL NO PART NO HP VOLT/PH Hz RPM

(Nom)

NEMA

START

CODE

FULL

LOAD

AMPS

CORD

LENGTH

CORD

SIZE

CORD

TYPE

SU33 130234 1/3 120/1 60 3450 A 3.4 9 ft. (2.7m) 18 SJTW

IMPORTANT !

1.) PUMP MAY BE OPERATED “DRY” FOR EXTENDED PERIODS WITHOUT DAMAGE TO MOTOR AND/OR SEALS. 

2.) INSTALLATIONS SUCH AS DECORATIVE FOUNTAINS OR WATER FEATURES PROVIDED FOR VISUAL ENJOYMENT MUST BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE 

 WITH THE NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE ANSI/NFPA 70 AND/OR THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION. THIS PUMP IS NOT INTENDED FOR USE IN 

 SWIMMING POOLS, RECREATIONAL WATER PARKS, OR INSTALLATIONS IN WHICH HUMAN CONTACT WITH PUMPED MEDIA IS A COMMON OCCURRENCE.

inches

(mm)

Model: SU33

SHUR-SwitchTM
Description of Corporate Bonus Plan



 Exhibit 10.2 

Description of Corporate Bonus Plan 

On March 18, 2010, the Board of Directors approved SuccessFactors, Inc.’s (the “Company”) 2010 Corporate Bonus Plan. Employees of the
Company, including the Company’s named executive officers, who are not on sales commission plans or other bonus plans, are eligible to receive cash and/or equity awards following the end of the year, based upon the attainment of performance
objectives for the year, which performance objectives will consist of corporate objectives established by the Board of Directors, as well as personal goals established by the chief executive officer and the compensation committee. Corporate
objectives for 2010 consist of bookings and non-GAAP operating profitability targets. The target bonus for 2010 is based on a weighting of 75% for corporate objectives and 25% for performance objectives. A portion of the bonus will be payable based
on achievement of targets on a quarterly basis as well as on an annual basis. In order to be eligible to receive a bonus, the employee must be employed by the Company at the time the bonus is paid. The amount of any bonus may be adjusted based on
the level of achievement of targets, with the Company retaining the discretion to further adjust bonus amounts.
118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5119 

AN ACT 

To amend title 31, United States Code, to provide small 

businesses with additional time to file beneficial ownership information, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5119 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protect Small Business 

3 and Prevent Illicit Financial Activity Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP INFORMATION REPORT5 ING DEADLINES FOR SMALL BUSINESSES. 

6 Section 5336(b)(1) of title 31, United States Code, 

7 is amended— 

8 (1) in subparagraph (B)— 

9 (A) by inserting ‘‘(but which may not ad10 just the report submission deadline)’’ after 

11 ‘‘Treasury’’; and 

12 (B) by striking ‘‘in a timely manner, and’’; 

13 (2) in subparagraph (C)— 

14 (A) by inserting ‘‘(but which may not ad15 just the report submission deadline)’’ after 

16 ‘‘Treasury’’; and 

17 (B) by striking ‘‘at the time of’’ and in18 serting ‘‘not later than 90 days after the date 

19 of such’’; 

20 (3) in subparagraph (D)— 

21 (A) by inserting ‘‘(but which may not ad22 just the report submission deadline)’’ after 

23 ‘‘Treasury’’; and 

24 (B) by striking ‘‘in a timely manner, and 

25 not later than 1 year’’ and inserting ‘‘not later 

26 than 90 days’’; and 
3 

•HR 5119 EH

1 (4) by adding at the end the following: 

2 ‘‘(H) UNABLE TO OBTAIN.—FinCEN may 

3 not by rule, guidance, or otherwise, permit a re4 porting company from submitting a report re5 lating to the inability of the reporting company 

6 to obtain or identify information in the alter7 native to submitting a report required under 

8 this subsection.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 12, 

2023. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5119 

AN ACT 

To amend title 31, United States Code, to provide 

poses. ficial ownership information, and for other pursmall businesses with additional time to file bene-
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ridgewood Electric Power Trust V (the “Trust”) for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Trust hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (section) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (section) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.








/s/ Randall D. HolmesName:
Randall D. HolmesTitle:
President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)Date:
August 4, 2010








/s/ Jeffrey H. StrasbergName:
Jeffrey H. StrasbergTitle:
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)Date:
August 4, 2010
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION




OF




CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER




AND




CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER




PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I,
Richard Man Fai LEE, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q/A of China Premium Lifestyle Enterprise, Inc. for the quarter ended
September 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of China Premium Lifestyle
Enterprise, Inc.




I, Joseph
Tik Tung WONG, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q/A of China Premium Lifestyle Enterprise, Inc. for the quarter ended
September 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of China Premium Lifestyle
Enterprise, Inc.




May
      28, 2010
              By:
              /s/ Richard Man Fai LEERichard
      Man Fai LEEChief
      Executive OfficerMay
      28, 2010
              By:
              /s/ Joseph Tik Tung WONGJoseph
      Tik Tung WONGChief
      Financial Officer, Treasurer and
Secretary





This
certification accompanies the Form 10-Q/A to which it relates, is not
deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of China Premium Lifestyle Enterprise,
Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the
Form 10-Q/A), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained
in such filing.