19208 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 73 / Monday, April 17, 1995 / Notices

Pikes Peak District: Gazette Telegraph,

published daily in Colorado Springs,

El Paso County, Colorado.

Rio Grande National Forest, Colorado

Forest Supervisor Decisions

Valley Courier, published daily in

Alamosa, Alamosa County, Colorado.

District Ranger Decisions

Valley Courier, published daily in

Alamosa, Alamosa County, Colorado.

Routt National Forest, Colorado

Forest Supervisor Decisions

Steamboat Pilot, published weekly in

Steamboat Springs, Routt County,

Colorado. In addition, for decisions

affecting an individual district(s), the

local district(s) newspaper will also

be used.

District Ranger Decision

Bears Ears District: Northwest Colorado

Daily Press, published daily in Craig,

Moffat County, Colorado. In addition,

notice of decisions by the District

Ranger will also be published in the

Hayden Valley Press, published

weekly in Hayden, Routt County,

Colorado, and in the Steamboat Pilot,

published weekly in Steamboat

Springs, Routt County, Colorado.

Yampa and Hahns Peak Districts:

Steamboat Pilot, published weekly in

Steamboat Springs, Routt County,

Colorado.

Middle Park District: Middle Part Times,

published weekly in Kremmling,

Grand County, Colorado.

North Park District: Jackson County

Star, published weekly in Walden,

Jackson County, Colorado.

San Juan National Forest, Colorado

Forest Supervisor Decisions

Durango Herald, published daily in

Durango, La Plata County, Colorado.

District Ranger Decisions

Durango Herald, published daily in

Durango, La Plata County, Colorado.

White River National Forest, Colorado

Forest Supervisor Decisions

The Glenwood Post, published Monday

through Friday in Glenwood Springs,

Garfield County, Colorado.

District Ranger Decisions

Aspen District: Aspen Times, published

weekly in Aspen, Pitkin County,

Colorado.

Blanco District: Meeker Herald,

published weekly in Meeker, Rio

Blanco County, Colorado.

Dillon District: Summit Sentinel,

published twice weekly in Frisco,

Summit County, Colorado.

Eagle District: Eagle Valley Enterprise,

published weekly in Eagle, Eagle

County, Colorado.

Holy Cross District: Vail Trail,

published weekly in Minturn, Eagle

County, Colorado.

Rifle District: Rifle Telegram, published

weekly in Rifle, Garfield County,

Colorado.

Sopris District: Valley Journal,

published weekly in Carbondale,

Garfield County, Colorado.

Nebraska National Forest, Nebraska

Forest Supervisor Decisions

The Rapid City Journal, published daily

in Rapid City, Pennington County,

South Dakota for decisions affecting

National Forest System lands in the

State of South Dakota.

The Omaha World Herald, published

daily in Omaha, Douglas County,

Nebraska for decisions affecting

National Forest System lands in the

State of Nebraska.

District Ranger Decisions

Bessey District: The North Platte

Telegraph, published daily in North

Platte, Lincoln County, Nebraska.

Samuel R. McKelvie National Forest:

The Valentine Newspaper, published

weekly in Valentine, Cherry County,

Nebraska.

Fall River and Wall Districts: The Rapid

City Journal, published daily in Rapid

City, Pennington County, South

Dakota,

Pine Ridge District: The Chadron

Record, published weekly in Chadron,

Dawes County, Nebraska.

Black Hills National Forest, South

Dakota and Eastern Wyoming

Forest Supervisor Decisions

The Rapid City Journal, published

daily in Rapid City, Pennington County,

South Dakota.

District Ranger Decisions

The Rapid City Journal, published daily

in Rapid City, Pennington County,

South Dakota.

Bighorn National Forest, Wyoming

Forest Supervisor Decisions

Sheridan Press, published daily in

Sheridan, Sheridan County,

Wyoming. In addition, for decisions

affecting an individual district(s), the

local district(s) newspaper will be

used (see listing below).

District Ranger Decisions

Tongue District: Sheridan Press,

published daily in Sheridan, Sheridan

County, Wyoming.

Buffalo District: Buffalo Bulletin,

published weekly in Buffalo, Johnson

County, Wyoming.

Medicine Wheel District: Lovell

Chronicle, published weekly in

Lovell, Big Horn County, Wyoming.

Tensleep District: Northern Wyoming

Daily News, published daily in

Worland, Washakie County,

Wyoming.

Paintrock District: Greybull Standard,

published weekly in Greybull, Big

Horn County, Wyoming.

Medicine Bow National Forest,

Wyoming

Forest Supervisor Decisions

Laramie Daily Boomerang, published

daily in Laramie, Albany County,

Wyoming.

District Ranger Decisions

Laramie District: Laramie Daily

Boomerang, published daily in

Laramie, Albany County, Wyoming.

Douglas District: Casper Star-Tribune,

published daily in Casper, Natrona

County, Wyoming.

Brush Creek and Hayden Districts:

Rawlins Daily Times, published daily

in Rawlins, Carbon County, Wyoming.

Shoshone National Forest, Wyoming

Forest Supervisor Decisions

Cody Enterprise, published twice

weekly in Cody, Park County,

Wyoming.

District Ranger Decisions

Clarks Fork District: Powell Tribune,

published twice weekly in Powell,

Park County, Wyoming.

Wapiti and Greybull Districts: Cody

Enterprise, published twice weekly in

Cody, Park County, Wyoming.

Wind River District: The Dubois

Frontier, published weekly in Dubois,

Teton County, Wyoming,

Lander District: Wyoming State Journal,

published twice weekly in Lander,

Fremont County, Wyoming.

Dated: April 6, 1995.

Elizabeth Estill,

Regional Forester.

[FR Doc. 95–9125 Filed 4–14–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 73 / Monday, April 17, 1995 / Notices 19209

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 737]

Peavey Electronics Corp.; AL

Pursuant to its authority under the

Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 18,

1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u),

the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the

Board) adopts the following Order:

Grant of Authority for Subzone Status,

Peavey Electronics Corporation (Electronic

Audio and Acoustical Products), Foley,

Alabama

Whereas, by an Act of Congress

approved June 18, 1934, an Act ‘‘To

provide for the establishment . . . of

foreign-trade zones in ports of entry of

the United States, to expedite and

encourage foreign commerce, and for

other purposes,’’ as amended (19 U.S.C.

81a–81u) (the Act), the Foreign-Trade

Zones Board (the Board) is authorized to

grant to qualified corporations the

privilege of establishing foreign-trade

zones in or adjacent to U.S. Customs

ports of entry;

Whereas, the Board’s regulations (15

CFR Part 400) provide for the

establishment of special-purpose

subzones when existing zone facilities

cannot serve the specific use involved;

Whereas, an application from the City

of Mobile, Alabama, grantee of ForeignTrade Zone 82, for authority to establish

special-purpose subzone status at the

electronic audio and acoustical products

manufacturing plant of the Peavey

Electronics Corporation in Foley,

Alabama, was filed by the Board on

March 3, 1994, and notice inviting

public comment was given in the

Federal Register (FTZ Docket 8–94, 59

FR 12892, 3–18–94); and,

Whereas, the Board has found that the

requirements of the FTZ Act and

Board’s regulations are satisfied, and

that approval of the application is in the

public interest;

Now, Therefore, the Board hereby

authorizes the establishment of a

subzone (Subzone 82C) at the Peavey

Electronics Corporation plant in Foley,

Alabama, at the location described in

the application, subject to the FTZ Act

and the Board’s regulations, including

§ 400.28.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 10th day of

April 1995.

Susan G. Esserman,

Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import

Administration, Alternate Chairman, ForeignTrade Zones Board.

Attest:

John J. Da Ponte, Jr.,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–9406 Filed 4–14–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

International Trade Administration

[A–201–601]

Fresh Cut Flowers From Mexico;

Preliminary Results of Antidumping

Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of Preliminary Results of

Antidumping Duty Administrative

Review.

SUMMARY: In response to a request by the

Floral Trade Council (petitioner), the

Department of Commerce (the

Department) is conducting an

administrative review of the

antidumping duty order on certain fresh

cut flowers from Mexico. The review

covers four producers/exporters, Rancho

El Aguaje (Aguaje), Rancho Guacatay

(Guacatay), Rancho El Toro (Toro), and

Visaflor S. de P.R. (Visaflor), and entries

of the subject merchandise into the

United States during the period April 1,

1991, through March 31, 1992. We have

preliminarily determined that dumping

margins exist for three of these

producers. The Department based these

margins on the best information

available (BIA). The fourth company,

Visaflor, made no shipments during the

period of review (POR).

Interested parties are invited to

comment on these preliminary results.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 17, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Rebecca Trainor or Maureen Flannery,

Office of Antidumping Compliance,

Import Administration, International

Trade Administration, U.S. Department

of Commerce, 14th Street and

Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington,

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4733.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

On April 8, 1992, the Department

published in the Federal Register (57

FR 11935) a notice of ‘‘Opportunity to

Request an Administrative Review’’ of

the antidumping duty order on fresh cut

flowers from Mexico (52 FR 13491,

April 23, 1987). In accordance with 19

CFR 353.22(a)(1), the petitioner

requested an administrative review for

Aguaje, Guacatay, Toro, and Visaflor.

On May 22, 1993, the Department

published a notice of initiation of this

review (51 FR 21769) covering the

period April 1, 1991, through March 31,

1992. Visaflor stated that it did not ship

subject merchandise from Mexico to the

United States during the POR. The

Department has now conducted this

review in accordance with section 751

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended

(the Act).

Because the Department determined

during the prior administrative review

that Guacatay had made sales in the

home market below the cost of

production (COP), we initiated a COP

investigation with respect to Guacatay

on October 10, 1992.

Scope of the Review

The products covered by this review

are certain fresh cut flowers, defined as

standard carnations, standard

chrysanthemums, and pompon

chrysanthemums. During the POR, such

merchandise was classifiable under

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the

United States (HTSUS) item numbers

0603.10.7010 (pompon

chrysanthemums), 0603.10.7020

(standard chrysanthemums), and

0603.10.7030 (standard carnations). The

HTSUS item numbers are provided for

convenience and Customs purposes

only. The written description remains

dispositive as to the scope of the order.

This review covers sales of the subject

merchandise manufactured by Aguaje,

Guacatay, Toro, and Visaflor, and

entered into the United States during

the period April 1, 1991, through March

31, 1992.

Best Information Available

The Department has determined that

the data submitted by Aguaje, Toro, and

Guacatay are unusable for the following

reasons. The original questionnaire

responses they submitted included

unaudited, ‘‘in-house’’ financial

statements. The respondents reported

that they were not legally obligated to

file income tax returns on sales made

during the POR. In response to a

supplemental questionnaire sent to all

three companies, the respondents

indicated that they were, in fact,

obligated to file income tax returns

covering the POR because of a change in

Mexican law.

In an additional supplemental

questionnaire, the Department asked the

respondents to submit copies of these

tax returns, and to reconcile them to the

unaudited ‘‘in-house’’ financial