alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 71 (Thursday, April 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 18880]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9174]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

Wage Committee, Notice of Meetings

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), in accordance with Pub. L. 
92-463, gives notice that meetings of the VA Wage Committee will be 
held on:

Wednesday, April 19, 1995, at 2:00 p.m.
Wednesday, May 17, 1995, at 2:00 p.m.
Wednesday, June 14, 1995, at 2:00 p.m.

    The meetings will be held in Room 1225, Department of Veterans 
Affairs, Tech World Plaza, 801 I Street, NW, Washington, DC 20001.
    The Committee's purpose is to advise the Under Secretary for Health 
on the development and authorization of wage schedules for Federal Wage 
System (blue-collar) employees.
    At these meetings the Committee will consider wage survey 
specifications, wage survey data, local committee reports and 
recommendations, statistical analyses, and proposed wage schedules.
    All portions of the meetings will be closed to the public because 
the matters considered are related solely to the internal personnel 
rules and practices of the Department of Veterans Affairs and because 
the wage survey data considered by the Committee have been obtained 
from officials of private business establishments with a guarantee that 
the data will be held in confidence. Closure of the meetings is in 
accordance with subsection 10(d) of Public Law 92-463, as amended by 
Public Law 94-409, and as cited in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2) and (4).
    However, members of the public are invited to submit material in 
writing to the Chairperson for the Committee's attention.
    Additonal information concerning these meetings may be obtained 
from the Chairperson, VA Wage Committee, Room 1225, 801 I Street, NW, 
Washington, DC 20001.

    Dated: March 30, 1995.

    By Direction of the Secretary.
Heyward Bannister,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-9174 Filed 4-12-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
Exhibit
32.1
















Principal
Executive Officer’s Certification Pursuant To




Section
1350


(furnished,
not filed)














In
connection with the Annual Report of GeoGlobal Resources Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-KSB/A for the year ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jean Paul Roy,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1)  The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and





2)  The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Jean Paul
Roy











Jean Paul
Roy


President
and Chief Executive Officer


June 3,
2008
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7117

ECM Industries LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6687

FluiDyne Fluid Power:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
#### JEFFERSON CITY MANOR, INC., d/b/a Jefferson City Manor Care Center, Respondent, v. MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF MEDICAL SERVICES, Appellant.

No. WD 47806.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Jan. 11, 1994.

Richard Beaver, Div. of Legal Services, Jefferson City, for appellant.

Mark G. Arnold, Husch & Eppenberg, St. Louis, Harvey M. Tettlebaum, Barbara Mil-tenberger, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before HANNA, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and FENNER, JJ.

LOWENSTEIN, Judge.

The facts and issues presented in this case are the same as those in *Willow Health Care, Inc., Willow Care Nursing Center v. State of Missouri, Department of Social Services, Division of Medical Services,*868 S.W.2d 229, handed down this day. The only difference between the cases is that Jefferson City Manor, Inc., d/b/a Jefferson City Manor Care Center had a fiscal year which ended February 29, 1988, and a rebased rate of $43.64.

The circuit court judgment is reversed and the case remanded with directions to reinstate the Commission’s decision to the extent it affirmed the Department’s rebased rate.

All concur.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

April 12, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6519

OK International, Inc: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_04.15.19.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6646

SGRE, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

127923 & (76)(77)(78) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 127923 

 COA: 247182 

Calhoun CC: 02-000035-FC 

DOUGLAS CHARLES WOODARD, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 9, 2004 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motions 

for miscellaneous relief are DENIED. 

p1024 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2005 

Clerk
**Exhibit 32.3**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

** **

** **

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Alamo Group Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard J. Wehrle,Vice President & Corporate Controller (Principal Accounting Officer) of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

-  The Form 10-K fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
-  The informationcontained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| April 7,  2010 | /s/Richard  J. Wehrle                                        |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|
|           | Richard J. Wehrle

Vice President & Corporate Controller |
|           | (Principal Accounting Officer)                               |
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 68 (Monday, April 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 18102]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8696]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Duane R. Roberts, et al.; Change in Bank Control Notices; 
Acquisitions of Shares of Banks or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. Once the notices have been accepted for 
processing, they will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later 
than April 24, 1995.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Kenneth R. Binning, 
Director, Bank Holding Company) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, 
California 94105:
    1. Duane R. Roberts, Murrieta, California; Robert W. Klemme, Palos 
Verdes Estates, California; Randall C. Luce, Anaheim, California; 
Richard B. Thomas, Carona Del Mar, California; and Entrepreneurial 
Capital Corporation, Riverside, California; to acquire 19.55 percent, 
for a total of 23.85 percent, of the voting shares of FP Bancorp, 
Escondido, California, and thereby indirectly acquire First Pacific 
National Bank, Escondido, California.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 4, 1995.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-8696 Filed 4-7-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANTTO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to the requirementset forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended, (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 ofTitle 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Jure Sola, ChiefExecutive Officer of Sanmina-SCI Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifiesthat, to the best of his knowledge:

 

1.                                       The Company’sAnnual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 27,2008, as amended (the “Periodic Report”), fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

 

2.                                       The informationcontained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, theundersigned has set his hand hereto as of June 11, 2009.

 
|   | /s/ Jure Sola                                                    |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Jure Sola  Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |

 

This certificationaccompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated byreference into any filing of Sanmina-SCI Corporation under the Securities Actof 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended(whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective ofany general incorporation language contained in such filing.

 

----
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Universal Capital Management, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended July 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael D. Queen, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Michael D. Queen

Michael D. Queen,

President

September 22, 2008
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7096

ECM Industries LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-41447 Conference Calendar

CLARENCE MORRISON, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus MICHAEL PURDY, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CA-97-CV-275

- - - - - - - - - - August 18, 1998 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Clarence Morrison, federal prisoner # 90039-132, appeals the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging the Bureau of Prison’s refusal to consider him eligible for a reduction to his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3621(e)(2)(B). He argues that the BOP’s policy of not considering eligible prisoners convicted of drug trafficking offenses for which the sentences were enhanced under the Sentencing Guidelines for possession of a firearm is an impermissible interpretation of § 3621(e)(2)(B)’s “nonviolentNo. 97-41447 -2- offense.” His argument is foreclosed by this court’s decision in Venegas v. Henman , 126 F.3d 760, 763-65 (5th Cir. 1997), cert. denied , 118 S. Ct. 1679 (1998).
AFFIRMED.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Frank Chicco, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Joseph Cerbone, J.), rendered June 21, 1988, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the third degree, grand larceny in the second degree and criminal mischief in the fourth degree and sentencing him, as a predicate felony offender, to concurrent, indeterminate terms of from 316 to 7 years’ imprisonment on the burglary and grand larceny counts and a concurrent definite term of one year’s imprisonment on the criminal mischief count, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant and an accomplice were caught red handed in an ice cream factory in the Bronx, after removing money from the company’s safe. The accomplice had a shotgun and a white bag containing $27,000. Defendant had a police radio scanner. The issue of whether or not the shotgun was loaded was sharply contested at trial, and defense counsel concentrated on this issue in his summation. Based on this, the prosecutor argued to the jury that defense counsel had conceded defendant’s guilt of third degree burglary. This was an inappropriate argument *(see, People v Pauli,*130 AD2d 389, 393, *appeal dismissed*70 NY2d 911). Nevertheless, defense counsel did not object to the remark and, although he later moved for a mistrial, he did not accept the trial court’s invitation to submit a proposed curative instruction. Further, he took no exception to the charge as given. In short, defense counsel made no attempt to avail himself of opportunities to neutralize the effect of the prosecutor’s comment. In light of the overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt, we affirm. Concur —Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Rosenberger, Kassal and Smith, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 32.02**

**Section 1350 Certification**

**In connection with this quarterly report of ML WintonFuturesAccess LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September30, 2006 as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof(this “Report”), I, Barbra E. Kocsis, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:**

1. This Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2. The informationcontained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: November 14, 2006                      |                 |
|----------------------------------------------|----------------------|
|                                         |
| By                                           | /s/ BARBRA E. KOCSIS |   |   |
| Barbra E. Kocsis                             |
| Chief Financial Officer                      |
| (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|                                              |                      |  |  |  |

 

1

----
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
 Date: August 10, 2007
    /s/ Robert C. Barry Jr.Robert C. Barry Jr.Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President
(Principal Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer)