alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5239 

To prohibit the issuance of an interim or final rule that establishes a vessel 

slowdown zone in the Gulf of Mexico until the Secretary of Commerce 

completes a study demonstrating that proposed mitigation efforts would 

have no negative impact on supply chains, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 18, 2023 

Mr. HIGGINS of Louisiana (for himself, Mr. DUNN of Florida, Mrs. LUNA, Mr. 

C. SCOTT FRANKLIN of Florida, and Mr. WEBSTER of Florida) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To prohibit the issuance of an interim or final rule that 

establishes a vessel slowdown zone in the Gulf of Mexico 

until the Secretary of Commerce completes a study demonstrating that proposed mitigation efforts would have 

no negative impact on supply chains, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘The Gulf of Mexico 

5 Commerce Protection Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5239 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON ISSUANCE OF RULE RELATING TO 

2 VESSEL SLOWDOWN ZONE IN GULF OF MEX3 ICO. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator of the Na5 tional Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration shall not 

6 issue an interim or final rule that establishes a vessel slow7 down zone in the Gulf of Mexico until the Secretary of 

8 Commerce— 

9 (1) completes a study demonstrating that miti10 gation protocols developed under subsection (b) 

11 would have no net negative impact on supply chains 

12 or maritime commerce; and 

13 (2) not later than 60 days after completing 

14 such study, submits to the Committees on Energy 

15 and Commerce and Natural Resources of the House 

16 of Representatives and the Committees on Com17 merce, Science, and Transportation and Natural Re18 sources of the Senate a report containing the find19 ings of such study. 

20 (b) MITIGATION PROTOCOLS REQUIRED.— 

21 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Under Secretary of 

22 Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere, in consulta23 tion with the Secretary of the department in which 

24 the Coast Guard is operating, the Secretary of De25 fense, the Secretary of Transportation, and the Sec26 retary of the Interior, and with input from affected 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5239 IH

1 stakeholders, shall develop mitigation protocols that 

2 make use of any monitoring system designed under 

3 section 11303 of the Don Young Coast Guard Au4 thorization Act of 2022 (16 U.S.C. 1391) to direct 

5 sector-specific mitigation measures that reduce risk 

6 of serious injury and mortality to Rice’s whales in 

7 the Gulf of Mexico. 

8 (2) PROHIBITIONS.—The mitigation protocols 

9 developed under paragraph (1) may not include any 

10 prohibitions on transit at night or implementation of 

11 a static vessel slowdown zone. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Universal Capital Management, Inc.
      (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2005 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Joseph T. Drennan, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my
      knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.









/s/
      Joseph T. Drennan


Joseph
      T.
      Drennan


Treasurer
      (Principal Financial Officer)


September
      14, 2005










The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and shall not be deemed
      filed
      by the Company for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act
      of
      1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to liability under that Section.
      This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into
      any
      filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act except to the extent
      that this certification is expressly incorporated by reference into any such
      filing.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-5782

Alo Tennessee Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5920

Tianhai Electric North America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
#### Lester JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 42168.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Jan. 30, 1990.

Lester Jackson, Moberly, pro se.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Robert V. Franson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before KENNEDY, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and BERREY, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from denial of Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an eviden-tiary hearing.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 62 (Friday, March 31, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 16677]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7928]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-30,472 and TA-W-30,472A]

Exxon Company, U.S.A. a/k/a Exxon Corporation Santa Ynez 
Production Division Thousand Oaks, CA, and Exxon Company, U.S.A. a/k/a 
Exxon Corporation Houston/Corpus Christi Production Division, Houston, 
TX; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker 
Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 USC 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance applicable to all workers of the 
subject firm.
    The certification notice was issued on December 15, 1994 and 
published in the Federal Register on January 20, 1995 (60 FR 4195).
    At the request of the State Agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The investigation 
findings show a name change from Exxon Company, U.S.A. to Exxon 
Corporation and some of the workers had their unemployment insurance 
(UI) taxes paid to Exxon Corporation.
    Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to 
properly reflect this matter.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-30,472 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    ``All workers of Exxon Company, U.S.A.P a/k/a Exxon Corporation, 
Santa Ynez Production Division, Thousand Oaks, California and the 
Houston/Corpus Christi Production Division, Houston, Texas who 
became totally or partially separated from employment on or after 
October 25, 1993 are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance 
under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.''

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 21st day of March, 1995.
Victor J. Trunzo,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 95-7928 Filed 3-30-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
```
#### Edward CLAYPOOL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 56300.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Jan. 23, 1990.

Lew A. Kollias, Janet M. Thompson, Columbia, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial of his motion to vacate sentence pursuant to Rule 29.15 after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION FOR R EHEARING

Appellate case name: Amigos Meat Distributors, L.P. v

. Julian Guzman and Catherine

Michele Montejano

Appellate case number: 01

- 16

- 00149

- CV

Trial court case n umber: 2013

- 25098

Trial court: 295th District Court of Harris County

Date motion filed: May 26, 2017

Party filing motion: Appellant

It is ordered that the motion for rehearing is DENIED GRANTED.

Judge’s signatur e: /s/ Sherry Radack

Acting individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Chief Justice Radack and Justices Brown and Lloyd

Date: August 8 , 2017
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE ) INSURANCE COMPANY, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-2361 ) GLORIA KAYE WOLFORD, JUAN C. ) LONDONO, and ALEXIS CERON, ) ) Respondents. ) ) Opinion filed February 14, 2018. Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Paul L. Huey, Judge. Daniel M. Schwarz of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Plantation, for Petitioner. Laura A. Turbe Capaz of Capaz Law Firm, P.A., Tampa, for Respondent Alexis Ceron. No appearance for remaining Respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Denied.
CASANUEVA, MORRIS, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6415

Apergy ESP Systems, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
RECONCILIATION
TO US GAAP















CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We
consent to the use of our report dated March 24, 2005 to the shareholders of Dundee Corporation
on the consolidated balance sheets of Dundee Corporation as at December 31, 2004
and 2003 and the consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders’
equity and cash flows for the years then ended and our report dated March 24,
2005 related to the supplemental note “Differences Between Canadian and United
States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles”, which are included in Dundee
Corporation’s Form 40-F filing.  We have not audited any financial
statements of Dundee Corporation subsequent to December 31, 2004 or performed
any audit procedures subsequent to the date of our audit reports.















[ex994002.gif]



Toronto,
Canada

Chartered
Accountants

April
6, 2005





DUNDEE
CORPORATION
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5696

Seaboard International, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 62 (Friday, March 31, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16680-16681]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7870]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

DOE/NSF Nuclear Science Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: DOE/NSF Nuclear Science Advisory Committee (1208).
    Date and Time: April 19, 1995 from 3:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, Room 1295, 4201 Wilson 
Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: John W. Lightbody, Program Director for Nuclear 
Physics, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, 
VA 22230, Telephone: (703) 306-1890.
    Minutes: May be obtained from the contract person listed above.
    Purpose of Meeting: To advise the National Science Foundation 
and the Department of Energy on scientific priorities within the 
field of basic nuclear science research.

    Agenda: [[Page 16681]] 
    * Presentation of Interim Report of the Long Range Plan Working 
Group (E. Moniz)
    * Discussion of the essential components of the recommendations 
to the agencies
    * Discussion of progress and plans for completion of the Long 
Range Plan
    * Discussion of the transmittal of the Subcommittee Report on 
RHIC Experimental Equipment
    * Public Comment (*)

    (*) Persons wishing to speak should make arrangements through 
the Contact Person identified above.

    Dated: March 27, 1995.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-7870 Filed 3-30-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Repros Therapeutics Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph S. Podolski, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: March 28, 2011
By:
/s/ Joseph S. PodolskiJoseph S. PodolskiPresident and Chief Executive OfficerRepros Therapeutics Inc.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Repros Therapeutics Inc. and will be retained by Repros Therapeutics Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Exhibit 32.1
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 70 (Wednesday, April 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18600-18601]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8993]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY


Public Information Collection Requirements Submitted to OMB for 
Review

action: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

summary: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has submitted 
to the Office of Management and Budget the following public information 
collection requirements for review and clearance in accordance with the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, 44 U.S.C. chapter 35.

dates: Comments on this information collection must be submitted on or 
before June 12, 1995.

addresses: Direct comments regarding the burden estimate or any aspect 
of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this 
burden, to: the FEMA Information Collections Clearance Officer at the 
address below; and to Donald Arbuckle, Office of Management and Budget, 
3235 New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503, (202) 395-
7340, within 60 days of this notice.

for further information contact: Copies of the above information 
collection request and supporting documentation can be obtained by 
calling or writing Muriel B. Anderson, FEMA Information Collections 
Clearance Officer, Federal Emergency Agency, 500 C Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2624.
    Type: New collection.
    Title: National Flood Insurance Program--Community Rating System--
Program Evaluation.
    Abstract: FEMA is collecting information through written survey, 
telephone surveys, and focus groups to assess the effectiveness of the 
Community Rating System (CRS). CRS is a voluntary program that 
communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program 
(NFIP) can join to lower flood insurance rates.
    Type of Respondents: Individuals or households, business or other 
for-profit, and State, Local or Tribal Government. [[Page 18601]] 
    Estimate of Total Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping Burden: FY 
95--634 hours; FY 96--621 hours.
    Number of Respondents: FY 95--3,190, FY 96--830.
    Estimated Average Burden Time per Response: Ranges from 5 to 20 
minutes for each of the 8 written and telephone surveys, and averaged 4 
hours for each of the 3 focus groups.
    Frequency of Response: One-Time.

    Dated: March 31, 1995.
Wesley C. Moore,
Director, Program Services Division, Operations Support Directorate.
[FR Doc. 95-8993 Filed 4-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-01-M