alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 69 (Tuesday, April 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18405-18406]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8856]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Dkt. C-3563]


Abovo, Inc., et al.; Prohibited Trade Practices, and Affirmative 
Corrective Actions

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION: Consent order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In settlement of alleged violations of federal law prohibiting 
unfair acts and practices and unfair methods of competition, this 
consent order prohibits, among other things, a Massachusetts company 
and its president from making false or unsubstantiated performance 
claims about any communication aid they offer in the future, and from 
making representations concerning the efficacy of their communication 
devices in enabling individuals with disabilities to communicate 
through facilitated communication, unless the respondents possess 
competent and reliable scientific evidence to substantiate the 
representation.

DATES: Complaint and Order issued March 22, 1995.\1\

    \1\Copies of the Complaint and the Decision and Order are 
available from the Commission's Public Reference Branch, H-130, 6th 
Street & Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20580.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Klurfeld or Kerry O'Brien, San 
Francisco Regional Office, Federal Trade Commission, 901 Market St., 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Suite 570, San Francisco, CA 94103. (415) 744-7920.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On Wednesday, January 4, 1995, there was 
[[Page 18406]] published in the Federal Register 60 FR 464, a proposed 
consent agreement with analysis in the Matter of Above, Inc., et al., 
for the purpose of soliciting public comment. Interested parties were 
given sixty (60) days in which to submit comments, suggestions or 
objections regarding the proposed form of the order.
    No comments have been received, the Commission has ordered the 
issuance of the complaint in the form contemplated by the agreement, 
made its jurisdictional findings and entered an order to cease and 
desist, as set forth in the proposed consent agreement, in disposition 
of this proceeding.

(Sec. 6, 38 Stat. 721; 15 U.S.C. 46. Interprets or applies sec. 5, 
38 Stat. 719, as amended; 15 U.S.C. 45, 52)
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-8856 Filed 4-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5302 

AN ACT 

To designate the Air and Marine Operations Marine Unit 

of the U.S. Customs and Border Protection located at 

101 Km 18.5 in Cabo Rojo, Puerto Rico, as the ‘‘Michel 

O. Maceda Marine Unit’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5302 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Michel O. Maceda Me3 morial Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

5 Congress finds the following: 

6 (1) Marine Interdiction Agent Michel O. 

7 Maceda served honorably in the United States Army 

8 as a wheeled vehicle mechanic prior to joining the 

9 United States Border Patrol as an Agent in Doug10 las, Arizona, in April 2016. 

11 (2) Agent Maceda became a Marine Interdiction 

12 Agent with U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 

13 Air and Marine Operations in Mayagu ̈ez, Puerto 

14 Rico, in 2021. 

15 (3) On November 17, 2022, Agent Maceda and 

16 2 other agents were conducting a drug interdiction 

17 stop off the coast of Puerto Rico, during which the 

18 agents boarded the target vessel. 

19 (4) During the stop, Agent Maceda was mor20 tally wounded when 1 of the occupants of the vessel 

21 shot the boarding agents with a firearm. 

22 (5) Agent Maceda is survived by his daughter, 

23 brother, and parents. 

24 SEC. 3. DESIGNATION. 

25 The Air and Marine Operations Marine Unit of the 

26 U.S. Customs and Border Protection located at 101 Km 
3 

•HR 5302 EH

1 18.5 in Cabo Rojo, Puerto Rico, shall forever be known 

2 and designated as the ‘‘Michel O. Maceda Marine Unit’’. 

3 SEC. 4. REFERENCES. 

4 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

5 paper, or other record of the United States to the marine 

6 unit referred to in section 3 shall be deemed to be a ref7 erence to the ‘‘Michel O. Maceda Marine Unit’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 24, 

2024. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5302 

AN ACT 

To designate the Air and Marine Operations MaUnit’’. Puerto Rico, as the ‘‘Michel O. Maceda Marine tection located at 101 Km 18.5 in Cabo Rojo, rine Unit of the U.S. Customs and Border Pro-
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-7401

Nissan North America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 71 (Thursday, April 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 18859]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9136]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Work Group on Pension Education; Advisory Council on Employee 
Welfare and Pension Benefits Plan; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to the authority contained in Section 512 of the Employee 
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. 1142, a 
public meeting of the Pension Education work group of the Advisory 
Council on Employee Welfare and Pension Benefit Plans will be held on 
May 9, 1995, in Room S-3215 A-B, U.S. Department of Labor Building, 
Third and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20210.
    The purpose of the meeting, which will begin at 9:00 a.m. is to 
finalize the issues to be examined and to determine witnesses and other 
testimonies to be solicited.
    Members of the public are encouraged to file a written statement 
pertaining to any topic concerning ERISA by submitting 20 copies on or 
before May 1, 1995 to Linda Jackson, Acting Executive Secretary, ERISA 
Advisory Council, U.S. Department of Labor, Suite N-5677, 200 
Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20210. Individuals or 
representatives of organizations wishing to address the Advisory 
Council should forward their request to the Executive Secretary or 
telephone (202) 219-8753. Oral presentations will be limited to ten 
minutes, but an extend statement may be submitted for the record.
    Organizations or individuals may also submit statements for the 
record without testifying. Twenty (20) copies of such statements should 
be sent to the Executive Secretary of the Advisory Council at the above 
address. Papers will be accepted and included in the record of the 
meeting if received on or before May 1, 1995.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 7th day of April, 1995.
Olena Berg,
Assistant Secretary, Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration.
[FR Doc. 95-9136 Filed 4-12-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-29-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7113

ECM Industries LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-7466

Nissan North America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

“Made in China 2025” or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
#### Walter ROBINSON, Appellant, v. MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Respondents.

No. WD 51291.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Submitted: March 5, 1996.

Order Filed: April 23, 1996.

Walter Robinson, pro se.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Cassandra K. Dolgin, Asst. Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondents.

Before HANNA, P.J., and SMART and ELLIS, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Walter Robinson appeals a ruling of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of respondents on Robinson’s petition for writ of mandamus. Robinson filed his petition for a writ, claiming he is entitled to a correction of the Missouri Department of Corrections as to the conditional release date for his sentence. The respondents moved for summary judgment in response to the petition, which was granted.

The judgment is appealable. The court has carefully considered Robinson’s point on appeal, and determines Robinson is not entitled to relief. Judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

August 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6468

David C. Poole Company:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6071

Dallas Airmotive, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4117

Scosche Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM GATEWAY 2000,
INC.'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         516,360
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  468,691
<ALLOWANCES>                                    18,968
<INVENTORY>                                    278,043
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,318,342
<PP&E>                                         429,056
<DEPRECIATION>                                 109,618
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,673,411
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          799,769
<BONDS>                                          7,244
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           768
<OTHER-SE>                                     814,773
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,673,411
<SALES>                                      5,035,228
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,035,228
<CGS>                                        4,071,601
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,071,601
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                21,612
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 637
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                382,716
<INCOME-TAX>                                   132,037
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            250,679
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   250,679
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.60
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Broadwing Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), each of the undersigned, hereby certifies as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the
United States Code, that to his knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                     |  |  |  |                       |  |                                                  
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 8, 2006 |  |  |  | Broadwing Corporation
|                     |  |  | 
|                     |  |  |  |                       |  | /s/    Stephen E. Courter                        
|                     |  |  |  | Name:                 |  | Stephen E. Courter                               
|                     |  |  |  | Title:                |  | Chief Executive Officer                          
|                     |  |  | 
|                     |  |  |  |                       |  | /s/    LYNN D. ANDERSON                          
|                     |  |  |  | Name:                 |  | Lynn D. Anderson                                 
|                     |  |  |  | Title:                |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### Regina LESTER, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Eugene LESTER, Respondent/Appellant.

No. 66871.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

May 23, 1995.

James P. Leonard, Padberg, McSweeney, Slater, Merz & Graham, St. Louis, for appellant.

Malcolm H. Montgomery, Johnson, Montgomery & Maguire, Cape Girardeau, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Husband appeals the maintenance provision of a June 24, 1994 decree of dissolution. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).