IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS ADRIAN URIBE, § APPELLANT § § §
v. § NO. 05-18-00001-CR § § § THE STATE OF TEXAS, § APPELLEE §

APPELLANT ADRIAN URIBE’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION
TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS: Adrian Uribe (hereinafter “Appellant”) respectfully requests that this Court grant an extension of time to file Appellant’s Brief in the instant case. In support of this motion, Appellant would show:

- I - The court below is the Criminal District Court 3 of Dallas County, Texas. The style of the case in the trial court is The State of Texas v. Adrian Uribe, with a trial
court cause number of F17-70392-J.

- II - The jury found Appellant guilty of a family violence assault. Appellant was sentenced by the trial court to imprisonment for a period of 3 years, but the trial court ACCEPTED 05-18-00001-CR FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS

DALLAS, TEXAS 6/7/2018 11:58 AM LISA MATZ CLERKs u s p en d ed t h e i m p o s i t i o n o f t h e s en t e n c e an d p l aced Ap pel l an t o n p ro b at i o n. Ap p el l an t is i ncarcerat ed a t t h e cu rren t t i m e b ecau s e o f p hi lo s o p h i cal d i fferen ces

reg ard i n g t h e t ri al co u rt ’ s o rd er t h at Ap pel l an t p art i ci p at e i n t h e SAFPF p ro g ram as

p art o f h i s p ro b at io n

. - III - Ap p el l an t i s rep res en t ed o n ap p eal b y un d ers ig n ed co u n s el

. Acco rd i n g t o t h i s
Co u rt ’ s o ffi ci a l o n - l i n e web si t e, t h e cu rren t d ead l i ne fo r t h e fi l i n g o f Ap p el l an t ’ s
Bri ef is J u n e 9 , 2 0 1 8, wh i ch i s a Sat u rd ay

. No p ri o r ex t en si o n h as been req u es t ed by Ap p el l an t , s u ch t h at n o p ri o r ex t en s io n s h av e b een g ran t ed b y t h i s Co u rt

. - IV -

Du e t o u n d ers i g n ed co u n s el ’ s ot h er d u t i es an d co m m i t m en t s, Ap p el l an t

res p ect f u l l y req u es t s an ex t en si o n o f t i m e i n t h e l en g t h o f t hi rt y (3 0 ) d ay s , wh i ch

wo u l d res ul t i n a n ew fi l i n g d ead l i ne o f J u l y 9 , 2 0 1 8 fo r Ap pel l an t ’ s Bri ef.

Un d ers ig n ed co u n s el h as recen t l y fi led t h e Ap p el l an t ’ s Bri ef i n t h e cas es o f Den n i s
Si m s v
. Th e St at e o f Tex as , 0 5 -1 8 -0 0 1 3 9 -CR an d 0 5 -1 8 -0 0 1 4 1

- C R ( fi l ed M ay 3 1,

2 0 1 8 ) an d t h e Ap p el lan t ’ s Am en d ed Bri ef i n t h e cas es o f D erek Lee Oes t rei ch v
. Th e
St at e o f Tex as , 0 5 -1 7 -0 05 4 5 -CR an d 0 5 -1 7 -0 0 5 88 -CR (fi led J u n e 6 , 2 0 1 8 ). Ap p el l an t ’ s cas e i s n o t cu rren t l y s et fo r s u b m i s s i o n , s u ch t h at t h e g ran t i n g o f

t h e i n st an t m o t i on s h ou l d n o t u n d u l y o r s ub s t an t i al l y d el ay t h e ev en t u al s u b m i s s i o n

o f Ap p el l an t ’ s cas e to t h i s Co u rt

. A d d i t i on al l y , t he ex t en s i o n i s n o t s o u g h t fo rp u rp os es o f d e l ay bu t t o p erm i t u n d ers i g n ed co u n s el t o fu l l y rev i ew t h e ap p el l at e

reco rd s o as t o in creas e t h e o p p o rt u n it y av ai l ab l e to u n d ers i g n ed co u n s el t o p l ace
b efo re th i s Co u rt t he very b es t arg u m en t s rel at i v e t o A p p el l an t ’ s ri g h t s an d l eg al

i n t eres t s

. - V -

W HEREFORE, PREM ISES CONSIDERED, Ap p el l an t p ray s t h at t h i s Co u rt ,
p u rs u an t t o i t s i nh eren t p o wer t o s u s p en d t h e ru l es o f ap p el lat e p ro ced u re as s et o ut
i n Tex

. R. Ap p

. P. 2 , g ran t Ap p el l an t a 3 0 -d ay ex t en s io n of ti m e fo r t h e fi l i n g o f t h e Ap p el l an t ’ s Bri ef an d es t ab li s h J u l y 9 , 2 01 8 as th e n ew d e a d l i n e fo r t h e fi l i n g o f Ap p el l an t ’ s Bri ef.

Res p ect fu l ly s u b m i t t ed ,

/ s / M i ch ael R. Cas i l las M ICHAEL R. CASILLAS, Ch i ef Ap p el l at e Pu b l i c Defen d er St at e Bar No

. 0 3 9 6 7 5 0 0 1 3 3 N. Ri v erfro n t Bl v d ., LB-2 Dal l as , Tex as 7 5 2 0 7 (2 1 4 ) 6 53 -3 5 5 0/ FAX (2 1 4) 6 5 3 -3 5 3 9 M ich ael .cas il las @ d al l as co u nt y .o rgCERTI FI C A TE OF SERVI C E AND COMPLI ANCE

I h ereb y cert i fy t h at

– n o l at er t h an Ju n e 8 , 2 0 1 8 – a tru e, el ec t ro n i cal l y fo rm at t ed co p y of t h e i n s t an t m o t i o n h as b een s erv ed o n o p p o s i n g co u n s el , t h e Ho n.
Lo ri Or d i w a y , As si s t an t Di s tri ct At t o rn ey / Ch i ef Ap p el l at e Pro s ecu to r, 1 3 3 N.
Ri v erfro n t Bl v d ., LB

- 1 9, Dal l as , Tex as 75 2 0 7 b y u s e of t h e el ect ro n i c-s erv i ce
fu n ct i o n t h at m ay b e us ed i n co n ju n ct i o n wi t h t h e el ect ro n i c f i li ng o f t h e i n s t an t

m o ti o n wi t h t hi s Co u rt t h ro u g h t h e el ect ro n i c fi l i n g serv i ce p ro v i d er t o w h i ch Ap p el l an t ’ s u n d ers i g ned co u n s el s u b s cri bes

. W h i l e Tex

. R. Ap p

. P. 9.4 (i )(2 )(A)-(D) do es n o t d es ig n at e a m ax im um n u m b er

o f wo rd s t h at an ex t en s i o n m o t i o n i s n o t t o ex ceed , I al s o h ereb y cert i fy – b as ed o n

t h e wo rd -co un t fu n ct i o n o f t h e W ord Perfect , wo rd -p ro ces s i n g s oft ware wi t h wh i ch

t h e i n s t an t m o t i o n was d raft ed – t h at t h e i n s t an t m o t io n co n t ai n s 4 33 wo rd s

.

/ s / M i ch ael R. Cas i l las M ich ael R. Cas i l l as