U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Food and Feed Safety Research: College Station, TX
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area College Station, Texas Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center Food and Feed Safety Research Research Publications at this Location





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Title:   Author  item
                                            Harvey, Rogeritem
                                            Andrews, Kathleen

                                                         - *Kate*item
                                            Droleskey, Robert

                                                         - *Bob*item
                                            KANSAGRA, K - ST. PETER'S UNIV HOSPITALitem
                                            STOLL, BARBARA - BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINitem
                                            Burrin, Douglas

                                                         - *Doug*item
                                            Callaway, Todditem
                                            Anderson, Robinitem
                                            Nisbet, David
  Submitted to: International Pig Veterinary Society (IPVS)
                                    Publication Type: Abstract Only
                                    Publication Acceptance Date: 3/5/2006
                                    Publication  Date: 6/21/2006
                                    Citation: Harvey, R.B., Andrews, K., Droleskey, R.E., Kansagra, K.V., Stoll, B., Burrin, D.G., Callaway, T.R., Anderson, R.C., Nisbet, D.J. 2006. Enteral feeding, compared to parenteral feeding, enhances bacterial gut colonization in neonatal pigs [abstract]. Reproduction Nutrition Development. 46(Suppl. 1):S17.Interpretive Summary:
                                Technical Abstract: Introduction
Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) in preterm human infants has been associated with increased incidence of sepsis and it has been suggested that sepsis may occur due to translocation of gut luminal bacteria (1).   In the present study, we sought to identify the composition of microbiota in the neonatal pig gut, their relationship to translocation events, and to examine the effects of TPN versus enteral (ENT) feeding on early gut colonization.    
Materials and Methods
Newborn, colostrums-deprived pigs (<24 h old) were fitted with intravenous catheters inserted into the jugular vein and divided into two groups.  One group (n = 13) daily received only intravenous feeding (TPN).  The second group (n = 13) was enterally fed an antibiotic-free, commercial pig milk replacer (ENT); the nutrient intake did not differ between groups.  After 7 d of treatment, pigs were euthanized and tissues collected.  Cultivation and differentiation of intestinal bacteria has been described (1).  Suspected C. perfringens and C. difficile isolates were confirmed by colony morphology, the ethanol spore test, API Test Strips (bioMerieux), and by an enzyme immunoassay (2).  
Results

Table 1. Colonization of segments of the intestinal tract by bacteria in ENT vs. TPN treated neonatal pigs
Pigs colonized (number of bacterial genera)
Treatment        Jejunum            Ileum      Cecum
ENT (n = 13)      11 (6)                 13 (7)       13 (7)
TPN (n = 13)       2 (1)*                 5 (3)**     13 (4)
Ent = enterally fed; TPN = total parenteral nutrition
*P = 0.0012; **P = 0.0016 by Fisher’s Exact Test  

Bacterial translocation from the intestinal tract to tissues or blood was not different on the basis of treatment--each treatment group had 8 of 13 pigs with translocation events (data not shown).  Bacterial concentration, number of bacterial species isolated, and the number of intestinal segments colonized were greater in the ENT group when compared to the TPN-treated pigs (Table 1).  Bacterial concentrations, number of bacterial species, and frequency of isolation progressively increased from the J to the C.  On the average, the ENT group had 2 to 3 log10 higher cfu/g of Enterococcus in the GI tract (particularly in the J and I) than the TPN group. The ENT group had 4/13 positive for C. perfringens and 1/13 positive for C. difficile toxin A production (Table 2).   The TPN pigs had 0/13 positive for C. perfringens and 5/13 isolates positive for C. difficile toxin A.  

Table 2.  Isolation of Clostridium spp. from the gut of ENT vs. TPN piglets                                                                     
                     Site of Isolation    Pigs pos. C.difficile           
Treatment     J**a        I         C                       (site)                              
ENT = 13        0         6         13       13         1 (C)           
TPN = 13        5         4          9       11         5 (J, I, C)*         **aJ = jejunum, I = ilium, C = cecum
*Different (P < 0.1) by Fisher’s Exact Test

Discussion
In our study, the authors hypothesize that C. difficile was able to colonize TPN pigs due to the reduced presence of commensals in the gastrointestinal tract of TPN pigs.  Similarly, when the autochthonous microflora is absent, increased C. perfringens and C. difficile have been observed with cases of necrotizing enterocolitis of preterm infants (3). 
We concluded that TPN was not positively associated with translocation, that ENT favored increased bacterial concentrations comprised of a more diverse speciation in the gastrointestinal tract, that Enterococcus is an early colonizer of the GI tract, that TPN retarded the colonization of the intestinal tract, and that TPN-treated neonates were at a higher risk of colonization by toxin-expressing strains of C. difficile.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov