alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 62 (Friday, March 31, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 16655]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7991]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Notice 
of Meeting, Board of Scientific Counselors

    Pursuant to Pub. L. 92-463, notice is hereby given of the meeting 
of the Board of Scientific Counselors, National Institute of 
Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Division of Intramural Research, on 
June 4-6, 1995, at the National Institutes of Health, Medical Board 
Room, Building 10, Rm. 2C116, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, Maryland, 
20892.
    This meeting will be open to the public from 8:30 a.m. to 12:20 
p.m. and from 1:30 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. on June 5th, and from 8:30 a.m. to 
2:10 p.m. on June 6th, to discuss program planning and program 
accomplishments. Attendance by the public will be limited to space 
available.
    In accordance with the provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(6), 
Title 5, U.S.C. and section 10(d) of Pub. L. 92-463, the meeting will 
be closed to the public from 8 p.m. to 10 p.m. on June 4th and from 
2:10 p.m. until adjournment on June 6th, for the review, discussion and 
evaluation of individual programs and projects conducted by the NINDS. 
The programs and discussions include consideration of personnel 
qualifications and performances, the competence of individual 
investigators and similar items, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    The Freedom of Information Coordinator, Ms. Mary Whitehead, Federal 
Building, Room 1012, 7550 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
telephone (301) 496-9231 or the Acting Executive Secretary, Dr. Harold 
Gainer, Acting Director, Division of Intramural Research, NINDS, 
Building 10, Room 5N214, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 
20892, telephone (301) 496-4297, will furnish a summary of the meeting 
and a roster of committee members upon request. Individuals who plan to 
attend and need special assistance, such as sign language 
interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact the 
Acting Executive Secretary in advance of the meeting.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 13.853, Clinical 
Basis Research; No. 13.854, Biological Basis Research)

    Dated: March 27, 1995.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 95-7991 Filed 3-30-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6309

CW Bearing USA, Inc:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6081

Dallas Airmotive, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
**Exhibit
31.2**
 
 I, Judith
A. Vitale, Chief Financial Officer of Firstwave Technologies, Inc.,, certify
that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Firstwave Technologies,
Inc.;
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
 
 4. The
registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
 
 a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;
 
 b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the “Evaluation Date”); and
 
 c)
presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
Date;
 
 5. The
registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of
registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
 
 a) all
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any
material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
 b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and
 
 6. The
registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual
report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
 
 Date:
April 12, 2005
 
 /s/
Judith A. Vitale
 Judith A.
Vitale
 Chief
Financial Officer
#### Carl Hubert CALMAN, Appellant, v. Jean Wilma CALMAN, Respondent.

No. 62271.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

June 8, 1993.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 14, 1993.

Lawrence 0. Willbrand, St. Louis, for appellant.

Frederick M. Steiger, Richard W. Fischer, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before CARL R. GAERTNER, P.J., and CRANE and CRAHAN, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Husband appeals from a judgment entered on a dissolution decree in St. Louis County Circuit Court. The Order awarded certain property to the wife which the hus*342band claims was an abuse of discretion by the trial court. The evidence at trial was disputed and we accept as true the evidence and permissible inferences favorable to the prevailing party. *Hughes v. Hughes,*761 S.W.2d 274, 276 (Mo.App.1988). We find no abuse of discretion. No prece-dential value would be served by a written opinion. Therefore, we file this Order in compliance with Rule 84.16(b).
Summary of DivX, Inc. 2010 Executive Cash Bonus Plan



 Exhibit 10.27 

DIVX, INC. 

SUMMARY OF 

2010 EXECUTIVE CASH BONUS PLAN 

General 
  

	 	•	 	 Subject to such limitations or adjustments as may be imposed by the Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of DivX,
Inc. (the “Company”) each of the officers of the Company who is subject to the reporting and other requirements of Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Executives”), of
the Company is eligible to receive awards under the Company’s 2010 Executive Cash Bonus Plan (the “Plan”). 


  

	 	•	 	 The Plan provides for the payment of cash bonuses to the Executives based upon the achievement by the Company of specific 2010 quarterly and annual
revenue and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) milestones and achievement by the Company of Key Results Areas (“KRA”) milestones. Revenue and EBITDA milestones
are classified under the Plan as “Bronze 1,” “Bronze 2,” “Silver 1,” “Silver 2,” “Gold 1,” “Gold 2,” “Platinum 1,” “Platinum 2,” and “Platinum 3.”



  

	 	•	 	 Cash bonuses received by Executives under the Plan are separate from any equity-based awards that the Board of Directors (the
“Board”) may provide to such Executives. 


  

	 	•	 	 The Board may change or modify the Plan at any time. 



Revenue and EBITDA Milestones 
  

	 	•	 	 For each quarter, the maximum bonus payable for achievement of a revenue milestone that each of the Executives is eligible to receive is equal to 60%
of his quarterly base salary. 


  

	 	•	 	 For each quarter, the maximum bonus payable for achievement of an EBITDA milestone that each of the Executives is eligible to receive is equal to 80%
of his quarterly base salary. 


  

	 	•	 	 At the end of 2010, the annual revenue and EBITDA results will be compared to the amounts paid as quarterly bonuses. Any discrepancy between amounts
paid as quarterly bonuses and the total amounts that would be due if the bonuses were calculated on an annual basis will be paid as an adjustment to the fourth quarter bonus payment. 



 

	 	•	 	 Revenue and EBITDA milestone payments will be paid in arrears for the prior performance period (whether annually or quarterly) subsequent to the
approval of financial results by the Audit Committee of the Board. 


 KRA Milestones 

 

	 	•	 	 The achievement of KRA milestones will be assessed on a discretionary basis by the Compensation Committee of the Board. 



 

	 	•	 	 Achievement of each KRA milestone will result in a cash payment of up to 15% of annual base salary to each of the Executives, for a maximum possible
bonus payment for achievement of all of the KRA milestones equal to 60% of annual base salary. 


  

	 	•	 	 The KRA milestones include, without limitation, certain product development and licensing goals, as well as operational goals for 2010.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-19-00902-CV

Yevgenia Shockome, Appellant

v.

Kyle Cowand, Appellee

FROM THE 459TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. D-1-GN-19-003849, THE HONORABLE TIM SULAK, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Yevgenia Shockome, appearing pro se, seeks to appeal an interlocutory

order signed by the trial court on November 22, 2019, which granted a motion to dismiss filed by 

one of the defendants, Kyle Cowand. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 91a.

On February 3, 2020, the Clerk of this Court sent notice to Shockome that it 

appears that this Court lacks jurisdiction over her appeal because the jurisdiction of this Court is 

generally limited to the review of final judgments and certain interlocutory orders as authorized 

by statute.1 See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001); see also De Ayala 

v. Mackie, 193 S.W.3d 575, 578-79 (Tex. 2006) (explaining test for determining finality of order 

1

 Shockome has filed two other appeals, assigned cause number 03-19-00903-CV and 

cause number 03-19-00904-CV in this Court. In those appeals, arising from these same trial court

proceedings, Shockome challenges additional trial court orders dismissing other defendants from 

her suit. Even considering the trial court’s dismissals as to these other defendants, no final 

judgment exists because additional defendants remain in the proceedings below. See Lehmann v. 

Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 205 (Tex. 2001) (explaining that judgment is not final unless it 

disposes of all pending claims and parties).
2

in context of probate cases). The Clerk asked Shockome to respond in writing and explain how 

this Court may exercise jurisdiction over this appeal.

Shockome has filed a response requesting that we permit her to proceed in this 

appeal because the trial court’s partial dismissal “fatally affects her ability to prove her conspiracy

claims on the remaining defendants.” Shockome’s response fails to identify a final judgment or

statutory authority for reviewing the interlocutory order from which she seeks relief. See Lehmann,

39 S.W.3d at 195. Because Shockome has failed to demonstrate this Court’s jurisdiction over 

this appeal, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).

__________________________________________

Chari L. Kelly, Justice

Before Justices Goodwin, Kelly, and Smith

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: February 28, 2020
Exhibit 32.2
 
 
 Certification of CFO Pursuant to
 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 as Adopted Pursuant to
 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of GAMCO Investors, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Jeffrey M. Farber, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:
 
 (1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/ Jeffrey M. Farber
 Name: Jeffrey M. Farber
 Title:   Chief Financial Officer
 Date:   November 5, 2010
 
 This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-7356

Nissan North America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

WILLIAM HENRY COSBY, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 58 MM 2016 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 23rd day of May, 2016, the Application for Stay is DENIED.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7526

Global Trade Works, LLC:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5059

A.W. Chesterton Company:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel