Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 57 / Friday, March 24, 1995 / Notices 15563

Q: When will I receive my check?

A: In most cases, if all your information is

complete, you should receive a supplemental

check within 90 days of our receipt of your

information.

Q: Why do you refer to this supplemental

refund check as an ‘‘interim’’ check?

A: We may collect additional crude oil

overcharge funds. If we receive additional

crude oil overcharge funds, we will issue a

final check to all applicants who have

received refunds in the crude oil proceeding.

Q: What happens if I don’t submit the

verification form at this time?

A: If you choose not to submit the

verification form at this time, we will not

issue you an interim check. Instead, you will

receive only a final check. This final check

will include the amount that would have

been issued in the interim check. However,

we do not know when the crude oil violation

collections will be completed, so we cannot

estimate when we will issue the final checks.

Q: I represent an applicant who was an

individual or a sole proprietor, but

circumstances have now changed (e.g., death,

divorce, personal bankruptcy, etc.). What

should I do?

A: You should submit an explanation of

the changes in circumstances with your

verification form. For example, if the original

applicant declared personal bankruptcy, you

should state whether the bankruptcy is open

or closed and the name of the trustee, if any.

If the original applicant is now deceased, the

survivor(s) of the decedent should state

whether there is an estate and whether the

estate is still open.

Q: I represent a corporation or partnership

whose status has changed (e.g., dissolution,

bankruptcy, sale to another company, etc.).

What should I do?

A: You should submit an explanation of

the changes in business status with your

verification form. For example, if the

applicant is a company that is no longer

operating, please provide the names and

percentage shares of the shareholders at the

time of dissolution. If the applicant was a

firm that has experienced a bankruptcy,

please state whether the bankruptcy is open

or closed, whether it is a Chapter 7 or 11, and

the name of the trustee, if any. If the

applicant was a company that has been sold

to another company, please state the new

owner’s name and whether it was a stock or

asset sale. If the applicant was a business

partnership in which a partner(s) is now

deceased, the surviving partner(s) should

state which partners remain and the

disposition of the deceased partner’s share in

the business.

Q: I know of another applicant who has

already received a supplemental check, yet I

received notice of this supplemental check

only recently. Why is that?

A: In order to handle the overwhelming

number of supplemental checks most

effectively, we are issuing notification of the

supplemental checks in stages according to

the order in which the original claims were

filed.

Q: I also filed an application in a refined

product proceeding (e.g., Texaco, Gulf,

ARCO, etc.). Will I receive a supplemental

check from that refund proceeding?

A: No. Only one refund check generally is

issued in refined product proceedings.

Q: Whom do I contact for more

information?

A: Call (202) 586–4921 from 9 am–5 pm

ET.

Send your verification form and any letters

of explanation or inquiry to: Supplemental

Crude Oil Refunds, Office of Hearings and

Appeals, U.S. Department of Energy, 1000

Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington,

D.C. 20585.

Verification Form

Part I: Correct Name and Address

b Yes, my name and current address are

correct on the mailing label.

b No, my name and current address are

different from the mailing label.

The correct information is (please print or

type):

lllllllllllllllllllll

lllllllllllllllllllll

lllllllllllllllllllll

lllllllllllllllllllll

b Yes, there has been a change in the

business or in the ownership of the business

due to death, divorce, sale, bankruptcy or

dissolution. Please submit an explanation

with this form.

b No, there has been no change in the

business or in the ownership of the business

due to death, divorce, sale, bankruptcy or

dissolution.

Part II: IRS Form 1099 Information

1. Are you exempt from IRS 1099 reporting

(if unsure, answer No? b Yes b No

2. Has the IRS informed you that you are

subject to backup withholding? b Yes

b No

3. Please provide your Taxpayer

Identification Number:

Social Security Number (Individuals Only)

llll–lll–lllll

Or

Employer Identification Number (Businesses

Only)

llll–llllllllll

Part III: Signature

I verify that all of the information above is

true and correct to the best of my knowledge.

lllllllllllllllllllll

Signature

lllllllllllllllllllll

Date

lllllllllllllllllllll

Title (if applicable)

( ) lllllllllllllllll

Daytime Telephone Number

Return this form and any letters of

explanation to: Supplemental Crude Oil

Refunds, Office of Hearings and Appeals,

U.S. Department of Energy, 1000

Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington,

D.C. 20585.

[FR Doc. 95–7437 Filed 3–23–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

[FRL 5178–2]

Agency Information Collection

Activities Under OMB Review

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: In compliance with the

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.

3501 et seq.), this notice announces that

the Information Collection Request (ICR)

abstracted below has been forwarded to

the Office of Management and Budget

(OMB for review and comment. The ICR

describes the nature of the information

collection and its expected cost and

burden.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on

or before April 24, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION OR A COPY

CALL: Sandy Farmer at EPA, (202) 260–

2740, please refer to EPA ICR #0277.10.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and

Toxic Substances

Title: Application for New or

Amended Registration. (ICR No:

0277.10; OMB No: 2070–0060). This ICR

requests renewal of an existing

clearance.

Abstract: EPA is responsible under

section 3 of the Federal Insecticide,

Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)

for registering pesticide products on the

basis of scientific data adequate to show

that, when used according to label

directions, they will not pose

unreasonable risk to human health,

wildlife, or the environment—including

endangered species.

Burden statement: The public burden

is broken into 6 components: The first

is reporting the activities required in the

registration of a new, never-beforeregistered chemical; there are

approximately 200 respondents in this

component and they average 80 burden

hours each. The second component

involves about 15,000 registrants who

are required to report on previously

registered or ‘‘me-too’’ pesticides; these

are less information-intensive and

require an average of 8 hours per

response. The third component is

comprised of applicants for ‘‘reducedrisk’’ new active ingredients; it involves

fewer than 20 applicants at 160 hours

each. The fourth component involves a

quarter hour each for approximately

36,000 training sessions in the Training

Verification Program, which is part of

the Worker Protection Standard.

The fifth component includes the

respondent burden associated with the
15564 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 57 / Friday, March 24, 1995 / Notices

labeling requirements for termiticide

and flammability. We estimate that

there will be approximately 300

respondents spending an average of 5

hours to meet these requirements.

The sixth component is the generic

burden associated with future policy

changes. Over the period of clearance

we expect to modify reporting

requirements to better serve the needs of

the applicants; we have provided 50,000

hours for this contingency.

Respondents: Respondents includes

applicants for: (1) pesticide registrations

for new never-before-registered

chemicals, (2) ‘‘reduced-risk’’ new

active ingredients, and (3) monitoring

and reporting on labeling activities.

Respondents also include trainers

(organizations and individuals) for

monitoring and reporting on the

Training Verification Program.

Estimated No. of Respondents: 38,000.

Estimated No. of Responses per

Respondent: 1.4.

Estimated Total Annual Burden on

Respondents: 199,000 hours.

Frequency of Collection: On occasion.

Send comments regarding the burden

estimate, or any other aspect of the

information collection, including

suggestions for reducing the burden,

(please refer to EPA ICR #0277.10 and

OMB #2070–0060) to:

Sandy Farmer, EPA ICR #0277.10, U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency,

Information Policy Branch—2136, 401

M Street SW., Washington, D.C. 20460

and

Tim Hunt, OMB #2070–0060, Office of

Management and Budget, Office of

Information and Regulatory Affairs,

725 17th Street NW., Washington,

D.C. 20503.

Dated: March 20, 1995.

Paul Lapsley,

Director, Regulatory Management Division.

[FR Doc. 95–7354 Filed 3–23–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–M

[FRL–5177–4]

Agency Information Collection

Activities Under OMB Review

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: In compliance with the

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice

announces the Office of Management

and Budget’s (OMB) responses to

Agency PRA clearance requests.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sandy Farmer (202) 260–2740, please

refer to the EPA ICR No.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

OMB Responses to Agency PRA

Clearance Requests

OMB Approvals

EPA ICR No. 0820.06; Hazardous

Waste Generator Standards; was

approved 02/23/95; OMB No. 2050–

0035; expires 02/28/98.

EPA ICR No. 1487.05; Cooperative

Agreements and Superfund State

Contracts for Superfund Response

Actions; was approved 02/03/95; OMB

No. 2010–0020; expires 02/28/98.

EPA ICR No. 1391.03; Information

Request for State Revolving Fund

Program; was approved 02/24/95; OMB

No. 2040–0118; expires 02/28/98.

OMB Disapprovals

EPA ICR No. 1667.01; Public

Information and Confidentiality

Regulations; was disapproved 02/17/95.

EPA ICR No. 1693.01; Plant-Pesticides

Subject to the Federal Insecticide,

Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act; was

disapproved 01/24/95.

Dated: March 17, 1995.

Paul Lapsley,

Director, Regulatory Management Division.

[FR Doc. 95–7357 Filed 3–23–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–F

[ER-FRL–4721–5]

Environmental Impact Statements and

Regulations; Availability of EPA

Comments

Availability of EPA comments

prepared February 20, 1995 Through

February 24, 1995 pursuant to the

Environmental Review Process (ERP),

under Section 309 of the Clean Air Act

and Section 102(2)(c) of the National

Environmental Policy Act as amended.

Requests for copies of EPA comments

can be directed to the Office of Federal

Activities at (202) 260–5076.

An explanation of the ratings assigned

to draft environmental impact

statements (EISs) was published in FR

dated April 10, 1995 (59 FR 16807).

Draft EISs

ERP No. D–FHW–E40757–AL Rating

EC2, Eastern Pleasure Island Hurricane

Evacuation Route Construction, AL–182

in Orange Beach to CR–95 near CR–20

(on the mainland) and CR–95 near CR–

20 to I–10, Funding and US Coast Guard

Bridge and COE Section 404 Permits

Issuance, Baldwin County, AL.

Summary: EPA expressed

environmental concerns that the

projects will impact between 66.7 and

75 acres of wetlands and that the

documents do not evaluate impacts to

terrestrial resources.

ERP No. D–FHW–G40140–TX Rating

EC2, Grand Parkway Segment (TX–99)

Improvements Project, from TX–225 to

I–10, Funding, COE Section 404 Permit

and Right-of-Way Grant, Harris and

Chambers Counties, TX.

Summary: EPA expressed

environmental concerns about the

proposal and requested that the

additional information needed in the

final EIS primarily focus on project

alternatives, cumulative impacts, a

current air quality analysis, and

environmental justice.

ERP No. D–FHW–K53007–CA Rating

EC2, Alameda Railroad Corridor

Consolidated Project, Construction from

Downtown Los Angeles to the Badger

Avenue Bridge/CA–91, Funding, COE

Section 404 Permit and ICC Approval,

Los Angeles County, CA.

Summary: EPA expressed

environmental concerns primarily with

the draft EIS’s assessment of the

project’s potential air quality impacts

and the mitigation measures described

in the project documentation. EPA

commended the inclusion of a worstcase emergency response plan for

hazardous material incidents, and

pollution prevention features to reuse/

recycle waste material from existing rail

lines.

ERP No. DS–FTA–K51035–CA Rating

EC2, Bay Area Rapid Transit District

(BART) Transportation Improvements,

San Francisco to San Francisco

International Airport Extension,

Updated and Additional Information,

Approval, Funding, COE Section 404

and Possible FHWA Encroachment

Permits Issuance, San Mateo County,

CA.

Summary: EPA expressed

environmental concerns due to potential

impacts to wetlands, endangered

species, and groundwater that is a

drinking water source for area residents.

EPA asked that the final EIS provide

more information on issues associated

with the Clean Water Act Section 404

permit, including the least

environmentally damaging practicable

alternative; and potential groundwater

impacts from project construction and

operation including mitigation and

monitoring for adverse impacts.

Final EISs

ERP No. F–AFS–L65173–OR Buzzard

Project Area Timber Sale and Road

Construction, Implementation, Umatilla

National Forest, Walla Walla Ranger

District, Union and Wallowa Counties,

OR.

Summary: EPA expressed

environmental concerns based on