alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      19,159,906
<SECURITIES>                                17,706,093
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            37,633,734
<PP&E>                                       4,401,649
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,524,501
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              40,583,482
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,705,259
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,015
<OTHER-SE>                                  37,402,245
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                40,583,482
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               584,202
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,344,873
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,335
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,198,319)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,198,319)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,198,319)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.25)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 71 (Thursday, April 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 18801]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9081]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[I.D. 030995A]


North Pacific Fishery Management Council; Agenda Change

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of agenda change.

SUMMARY: An agenda for public meetings of the North Pacific Fishery 
Management Council (Council) and its advisory bodies, which are 
scheduled during the week of April 17, 1995, was published on March 17, 
1995. Modifications to the agenda were published on March 31, 1995, and 
the following additional change is made to the meeting agenda. All 
other information previously published remains unchanged.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dave Witherell, North Pacific Fishery 
Management Council, P.O. Box 103136, Anchorage, AK 99510; telephone: 
(907) 271-2809.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The initial agenda published on March 17, 
1995 (60 FR 14425) was changed to remove two agenda times, add an 
additional item, and change the schedule on March 31 (60 FR 16621). 
This additional change adds another agenda item.
    Discussion and final approval of a fishery management plan (FMP) 
for the scallop fisheries in the exclusive economic zone off Alaska has 
been added to the agenda. This FMP may go forward either as a Council 
FMP or Secretarial FMP, and may extend regulations implemented by 
emergency rule published on March 1, 1995, (60 FR 11054). The Council 
also will discuss how to proceed with further amendments to the plan. 
Discussion of these topics may occur as early as April 19 (rather than 
April 21 as shown in the current schedule).

    Dated: April 7, 1995.
Richard W. Surdi,
Acting Director, Office of Fisheries Conservation and Management, 
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 95-9081 Filed 4-12-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3309

General Bearing Corp:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

                Pursuant to the requirement setforth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,(the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the UnitedStates Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Robert P. Akins, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of Cymer, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Registrant”), herebycertifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

1.               The Registrant’sannual report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005, to whichthis certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Report”), fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act; and

 

2.               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

**In Witness Whereof**, the undersigned has sethis hand hereto as of the 15th day of March, 2006.

 
| /s/Robert P. Akins                        |   |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|
| Robert P. Akins, Chief  Executive Officer |

 

                 This certification accompaniesthe Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities andExchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filingof Cymer, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of theForm 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained insuch filing.

 

----
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 23, 2022

No. 04

- 22

- 00531

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF I.M., A CHILD

,

From the 57th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021PA00828

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The trial court signed the Order of Termination on March 22, 2022, making the notice of

appeal due on April 11, 2022. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(b). A notice of appeal was filed on

August 19, 2022. Therefore, it appears that this Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. It is

therefore ORDERED that Appellant(s) show cause in writing, no later tha n Octob er 3, 2022

, why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If Appellant(s) fail to respond

within the time provided, the appeal will be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App.

P. 42.3(c).

Furthermore, on August 29, 2022, the clerk’s record in this appeal was filed. The notice

of appeal, which appe ars to be drafted by a pro se

, is defective in several ways, most importantly

in that it does not state the date of the judgment or order appealed from and does not identify the

appellant(s). Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.1(d) sets forth the requir ed contents of a

notice of appeal. The notice of appeal in this case does not comply with Rule 25.1(d) because it

does not:

. . .

(2) state the date of the judgment or order appealed from;

(3) state that the party desires to appeal;

(4) state the cou rt to which the appeal is taken . . .;;

(5) state the name of each party filing the notice;

(6) in an accelerated appeal, state that the appeal is accelerated and state whether

it is a parental termination or child protection case, as defined in Rule 28 .4;

(7) in a restricted appeal:

(A) state that the appellant is a party affected by the trial court’s judgment

but did not participate

-- either in person or through counsel

-- in the hearing

that resulted in the judgment complained of;

(B) state that the appellant did not timely file either a postjudgment motion,

request for findings of fact and conclusions of law, or notice of appeal; and(C) be verified by the appellant if the appellant does not have counsel.

(8) state, if applicable, that the appell ant is presumed indigent and may proceed

without paying costs under Rule 20.1.

TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1(d). Therefore, on September 1, 2022, this Court ordered Appellant(s) to

file an amended notice of appeal on or before September 11, 2022. To date, no amended notice

of appeal has been filed.

All other appellate deadlines are suspended until further order of this Court.

It is so ORDERED September 23 , 2022.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

__________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, CLERK OF COURT
Exhibit 10.13



AMENDMENT TO

PILLOWTEX CORPORATION

2002 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN



Pillowtex Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
Company), pursuant to authorization of its Board of Directors, adopts the following amendment to the Pillowtex Corporation 2002 Equity Incentive Plan (the Plan).



WHEREAS, the Company adopted the Plan effective as of May 24, 2002, and reserved 1.4 million shares of its
common stock for issuance under the Plan; and



WHEREAS, the Company wishes to increase the number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the Plan to 2.9 million shares, which increased number includes shares of common stock covered by awards granted under the Plan
from and after May 24, 2002.



NOW, THEREFORE, the
Plan is amended as follows:



1. The first
sentence of Section 3 of the Plan (Shares Available Under Plan) is amended in its entirety to read as follows:



Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 12, the shares of Common Stock which may be issued or transferred and covered by outstanding
Awards granted under the Plan will not exceed in the aggregate 2.9 million shares.



2. The foregoing amendment will be effective with respect to awards granted under the Plan from and after October 11, 2002.



PILLOWTEX CORPORATIONBy:

/S/    JOHN F.
STERLINGName: John F. Sterling Title: Vice President and General Counsel
Order entered July 16, 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 21
- 00329
- CR
EARNEST DEWAYNE CLAYTON , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee On Appeal from the Cou nty Court at Law No. 1

Rockwall County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CR17
- 2027

O RDER Appellant was convicted on April 20, 2021 and filed his notice of appeal on May 3, 2021. The appellate record was due on June 19, 2021. Although the clerk ’ s record was fi led, the reporter ’ s record has not been filed . C ourt r eporter Deborah
Hamon in formed the Court b y letter dated June 18, 2021 that appellant is not indigent and no arrange ment s to pay for the reporter ’ s record ha ve been made. On June 21, 2021 , we notified a ppel lant and instructed him t o provide written verification that he had paid or made arrangements to pay fo r the reporter ’ s recordwithin ten days of the date of the letter. We c au tioned appellant that the failure to

do so would result in the appeal bei ng submitted without a reporter ’ s record. To date, appel lant has not complied with the Court ’ s inst ructions , and he ha s failed to
otherwise communicate with the Court regard ing the appeal. Therefore, we ORDER this appeal submitted without a reporter ’ s record.
See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(c)

. Appellant ’ s brief is due by August 16, 2021.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
Exhibit
10.25














Description
of terms of oral consulting agreement between


GeoGlobal
Resources Inc. and Amicus Services Inc.







GeoGlobal
Resources Inc. (the Registrant) is a party to an oral agreement with Amicus
Services Inc. an Alberta corporation (Amicus), whose outstanding shares are
owned by Vincent Roy, the brother of Jean Paul Roy, the President, chief
executive officer and the principal stockholder of the
Registrant.  Pursuant to the oral agreement, Amicus provides IT and
computer related consulting services to the Registrant and its subsidiaries and
the Registrant compensates Amicus for those services.





The IT
and computer related services provided by Amicus cover such duties as;
organizing, managing and maintaining a geological database in Canada relating to
GeoGlobal’s exploration interests in India and elsewhere; upgrading on a
continuing basis all information systems (both software and hardware) and
network systems (including onsite and offsite backups of data and security
issues) of a corporate nature; and providing ongoing IT and computer related
services as required by the Registrant’s Calgary staff.





The
hourly rate paid to Amicus through December 31, 2007 was
Cdn$40.00.  Commencing January 1, 2008 the hourly rate increased to
Cdn$70.00.





Amicus
will provide these IT and computer related services to the Registrant
approximately three days per week, as requested by the Registrant.





The oral
agreement can be immediately terminated by either party at any time by notice
given to the other party.





Vincent
Roy as the sole stockholder of Amicus, is entitled to participate in the
Registrant’s Stock Incentive Plans on such terms and as and when determined and
in the sole discretion of the Registrant’s Board of Directors in consultation
with Management of the Registrant.
Unassociated Document


Exhibit 10.1


 


 


Property Borrowing Agreement







Party A: Zhao Dong Ke


 


 


Party B: Yangling Dongke Maidisen Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.


 


In order to support the development of Party B, Party A voluntarily lend one of his house property to party B, the two sides reached the following agreement:


 


1.Location of Party B’s house property: Dongxing Science and Technology Building, No.1 Xin Ke Road in xi’an city. areas: 1600m2. State: full-decoration office building.


 


2.the house property which Party A lends to Party B is limited to meet Party B’s business needs which caused by removing its sales and management departments from the factory location to xi’an and Party 


B’s fast-growing market networking needs. Party B has no right to change the use and structure of the Party A’s house property.


 


3. Time Limit: January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2011.


 


4, Costs Agreement: free of charge for five years.


 


Party A


 


By: /s Zhao Dongke












Zhao Dongke


 


Party B


By: /s Zheng Liming








 Zheng Liming


 


Seal: Yangling Dongke Maidisen Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd


 


 Signing Date: December 26, 2006
**Exhibit 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

Board of Directors and Stockholders 

Global ePoint, Inc. and Subsidiaries 

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statement of Global ePoint, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Forms S-3 (No. 333-129938, 333-127735, 333-127734, 333-122125, 333-118770) and on Form S-8 (No. 333-127315) of our report dated March 31, 2006 appearing in theAnnual Report on Form 10-KSB of Global ePoint, Inc. and Subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2006 and to the reference to us under the heading “Experts.” 

HASKELL & WHITE LLP 

Irvine, California

April 16, 2007
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7483

CHRISTOPHER L. HARRIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ALETA BARIE, Clerk of Court,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern 

District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Senior 

District Judge. (1:13-cv-22649)

Submitted: March 12, 2015 Decided: March 16, 2015

Before GREGORY, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher L. Harris, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Christopher L. Harris appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

his motion for leave to make a deposit in court pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 2014 (2012), and denying his motion for 

reconsideration. Harris sought to pay a criminal fine imposed 

by the district court in Indiana with a promissory note. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we deny Harris’ pending motions and affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Harris v. Barie, No. 

1:13-cv-22649 (S.D.W. Va. Sept. 15, 2014; Oct. 7, 2014). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 26, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-6705

Invacare Corp:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-5439

Robert Bosch Tool:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXHIBIT 13.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Magal Security System Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Raya Asher, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Raya Asher*
---------------
Raya Asher
Chief Financial Officer

July 14, 2006

     * The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at
the Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
---

---

Exhibit 10.2

# INDEPENDENT
AUDITORS CONSENT

To the Shareholders of
Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd.

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-113932,
333-96630, 333-08826, 333-10092, 333-12466 and 333-12988) of our report dated January 19,
2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Gilat Satellite Networks
Ltd. included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006.

MAYER HOFFMAN MCCANN P.C.
Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania
March 26, 2007



---

---