17032 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 64 / Tuesday, April 4, 1995 / Proposed Rules

condition described in this AD. Such a

request should include an assessment of the

effect of the changed configuration on the

unsafe condition addressed by this AD. In no

case does the presence of any modification,

alteration, or repair remove any airplane from

the applicability of this AD.

Compliance: Required as indicated, unless

accomplished previously.

To prevent failure of the strut and

subsequent loss of an engine, accomplish the

following:

Note 2: Paragraph (a) of this AD restates the

requirements for initial and repetitive visual

inspections contained in paragraphs A., and

C., respectively, of AD 79–17–07, amendment

39–3583. Therefore, for operators who have

previously accomplished at least the initial

inspection in accordance with AD 79–17–07,

paragraph (a) of this AD requires that the

next scheduled inspection be performed

within the intervals specified in (a)(1) or

(a)(2), as applicable, after the last inspection

performed in accordance with paragraph A.

or C. of AD 79–17–07.

(a) For airplanes listed in Boeing Service

Bulletin 747–54–2062, dated August 17,

1979: Prior to the accumulation of 5,000 total

landings on the airplane, or within 500 hours

time-in-service after September 4, 1979 (the

effective date of AD 79–17–07, Amendment

39–3533), whichever occurs later, perform a

visual inspection of the forward lower

diagonal brace fittings of the inboard pylon

to detect cracking, in accordance with Boeing

Service Bulletin 747–54–2062, dated August

17, 1979, or Revision 7, dated December 21,

1994; or in accordance with a method

approved by the Manager, Seattle Aircraft

Certification Office, FAA, Transport Airplane

Directorate. After the effective date of this

AD, only Revision 7 of the service bulletin

shall be used.

Note 3: Inspections performed prior to the

effective date of this AD are considered in

compliance with this paragraph if performed

in accordance with Boeing Service Bulletin

747–54–2062, Revision 1, dated November

13, 1980; Revision 2, dated March 19, 1981;

Revision 3, dated August 28, 1981; Revision

4, dated June 30, 1982; Revision 5, dated June

1, 1984; or Revision 6, dated October 2, 1986.

(1) If no cracking is detected, repeat the

inspections at intervals not to exceed 1,000

landings until all affected fittings are

replaced with steel fittings in accordance

with Revision 7 of the service bulletin.

(2) If any cracking is detected, prior to

further flight, accomplish either paragraph

(a)(2)(i) or (a)(2)(ii) of this AD until the

inspections required by paragraph (b) of this

AD are accomplished.

(i) Repair or replace the cracked fitting in

accordance with the service bulletin; or

(ii) Rework the cracked fitting in

accordance with the service bulletin as

required by paragraph (b) of this AD.

Thereafter, repeat the inspections at intervals

not to exceed 250 landings until the

reworked fitting is replaced with a

serviceable fitting, or until the inspections

required by paragraph (b) of this AD are

accomplished.

(b) For airplanes as listed in Boeing Service

Bulletin 747–54–2062, Revision 7, dated

December 21, 1994: Perform a detailed visual

inspection and a surface high frequency eddy

current (HFEC) inspection to detect cracking

of the inboard strut-to-diagonal brace attach

fittings, in accordance with the service

bulletin at the time specified in either

paragraph (b)(1) or (b)(2) of this AD, as

applicable.

(1) For airplanes on which a cracked fitting

has been reworked in accordance with

Boeing Service Bulletin 747–54–2062, dated

August 17, 1979: Perform the inspections

within 250 landings since the last inspection

performed in accordance with paragraph

(a)(2)(ii) of this AD.

(2) For airplanes other than those

identified in paragraph (b)(1) of this AD:

Perform the inspections at the earlier of the

times specified in paragraph (b)(2)(i) or

(b)(2)(ii) of this AD.

(i) Prior to the accumulation of 5,000 total

landings on the airplane, or within 1,000

landings after the effective date of this AD,

whichever occurs later; or

(ii) Within 1,000 landings since the last

inspection performed in accordance with

paragraph (a) of this AD.

(c) If no cracking is detected during the

inspections required by paragraph (b) of this

AD, repeat the inspections thereafter at

intervals not to exceed 1,000 landings.

(d) If more than one crack is found during

any inspection required by this AD, or if any

crack is detected that is beyond the limits

specified in Boeing Service Bulletin 747–54–

2062, Revision 7, dated December 21, 1994,

prior to further flight, replace the attach

fitting with a steel fitting in accordance with

the service bulletin.

(e) If any transverse or longitudinal crack

is found during the inspection required by

paragraph (b) of this AD, and that crack is

within the limits specified by Boeing Service

Bulletin 747–54–2062, Revision 7, dated

December 21, 1994: Prior to further flight,

stop drill the crack in accordance with the

service bulletin, and accomplish the

requirements of either paragraph (e)(1) or

(e)(2) of this AD, as applicable.

(1) For any transverse crack that is found,

accomplish the following:

(i) Prior to further flight, remove the

affected fastener and perform an open-hole

HFEC inspection to detect cracking of the

fastener hole, in accordance with the service

bulletin. Thereafter, repeat this inspection

within 125 landings.

(ii) Repeat the inspections required by

paragraph (b) of this AD within 125 landings

after performing them initially.

(iii) If any crack is found during the

inspections required by this paragraph and

the crack is beyond the limits specified in the

service bulletin, prior to further flight,

replace the attach fitting with a steel fitting

in accordance with the service bulletin.

(iv) Prior to the accumulation of 250

landings following the detection of the

transverse cracking, unless previously

accomplished, replace the attach fitting with

a steel fitting in accordance with the service

bulletin.

(2) For any longitudinal crack that is

found, accomplish the following:

(i) Repeat the inspection required by

paragraph (b) of this AD at intervals not to

exceed 250 landings.

(ii) Prior to the accumulation of 1,000

landings following detection of the

longitudinal cracking, replace the attach

fitting with a steel fitting in accordance with

the service bulletin.

(f) Replacement of the attach fittings of the

strut-to-diagonal brace with steel fittings, in

accordance with Boeing Service Bulletin

747–54–2062, Revision 7, dated December

21, 1994, constitutes terminating action for

the requirements of this AD.

(g) An alternative method of compliance or

adjustment of the compliance time that

provides an acceptable level of safety may be

used if approved by the Manager, Seattle

ACO. Operators shall submit their requests

through an appropriate FAA Principal

Maintenance Inspector, who may add

comments and then send it to the Manager,

Seattle ACO.

Note 4: Information concerning the

existence of approved alternative methods of

compliance with this AD, if any, may be

obtained from the Seattle ACO.

(h) Special flight permits may be issued in

accordance with §§ 21.197 and 21.199 of the

Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197

and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a

location where the requirements of this AD

can be accomplished.

Issued in Renton, Washington, on March

29, 1995.

Darrell M. Pederson,

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.

[FR Doc. 95–8174 Filed 4–3–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–U

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

16 CFR PART 248

Request for Comments Concerning

Guides for the Beauty and Barber

Equipment and Supplies Industry

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION: Request for public comments.

SUMMARY: The Federal Trade

Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’)

requests public comments on its Guides

for the Beauty and Barber Equipment

and Supplies Industry. The Commission

is also requesting comments about the

overall costs and benefits of the Guides

for the Beauty and Barber Equipment

and Supplies Industry and their overall

regulatory and economic impact as a

part of its systematic review of all

current Commission regulations and

guides.

DATES: Written comments will be

accepted until June 5, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Comments should be

directed to: Secretary, Federal Trade

Commission, Room H–159, Sixth Street

and Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,

Washington, DC 20580. Comments

about the Guides for the Beauty and
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 64 / Tuesday, April 4, 1995 / Proposed Rules 17033

Barber Equipment and Supplies

Industry should be identified as ‘‘16

CFR Part 248—Comment.’’

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Douglas J. Goglia, Attorney, Federal

Trade Commission, New York Regional

Office, 150 William Street, 13th Floor,

New York, NY 10038, (212) 264–1229.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

Commission has determined, as part of

its oversight responsibilities, to review

rules and guides periodically. These

reviews will seek information about the

costs and benefits of the Commission’s

rules and guides and their regulatory

and economic impact. The information

obtained will assist the Commission in

identifying rules and guides that

warrant modification or recission.

At this time, the Commission solicits

written public comments concerning the

Commission’s Guides for the Beauty and

Barber Equipment and Supplies

Industry (the ‘‘Beauty/Barber Supplies

Guides,’’ or the ‘‘Guides’’).

The Beauty/Barber Supplies Guides,

like the other industry guides issued by

the Commission, ‘‘are administrative

interpretations of laws administered by

the Commission for the guidance of the

public in conducting its affairs in

conformity with legal requirements.

They provide the basis for voluntary

and simultaneous abandonment of

unlawful practices by members of

industry.’’ 16 CFR 1.5. Conduct

inconsistent with the Beauty/Barber

Supplies Guides may result in

corrective action by the Commission

under applicable statutory provisions.

The Commission may decide to

promulgate an industry guide ‘‘when it

appears to the Commission that

guidance as to the legal requirements

applicable to particular practices would

be beneficial in the public interest and

would serve to bring about more

widespread and equitable observance of

laws administered by the Commission.’’

16 CFR 1.6.

The Beauty/Barber Supplies Guides

designate as unacceptable certain

advertising and trade practices relating

to the sale of products used by, and/or

marketed through, ‘‘Industry Members’’

(as defined in § 248.0 of the Beauty/

Barber Supplies Guides) such as barber

shops, barber schools, beauty parlors,

beauty salons, and beauty clinics. Such

products embrace a wide range of

beauty and barber preparations, as well

as articles or items of equipment,

furnishings, and supplies for such

establishments. The Beauty/Barber

Supplies Guides include, among other

things, guidance about the use of trade

names, symbols, and depictions; the

defamation of competitors or the false

disparagement of their products; false

invoicing; push money; advertising or

promotional allowances, or services or

facilities; commercial bribery; enticing

away employees of competitors;

inducing breach of contract; exclusive

dealing arrangements; and price

discrimination.

The Commission believes that certain

sections of the Beauty/Barber Supplies

Guides may not be so specific to the

beauty and barber industry that they are

warranted in light of general guidance

available elsewhere. For example, the

statement on discriminatory pricing

may be in large part needlessly

duplicative of sections (a) and (f) of the

Robinson-Patman Act, and the

statement on discriminatory

promotional allowances and services

may be duplicative of the so-called Fred

Meyer Guides, which interpret sections

(d) and (e) of the Robinson-Patman Act

and section 5 of the Federal Trade

Commission Act. See Guides for

Advertising Allowances and Other

Merchandising Payments and Services,

16 CFR part 240. Similarly, other

sections of the Beauty/Barber Supplies

Guides describe general principles

derived from the antitrust laws and

consumer protection laws enforced by

the Commission, but in ways that may

not be especially specific to the beauty

and barber equipment industry.

If the Commission elects to retain the

Beauty/Barber Supplies Guides after

conducting this review, it intends to

update certain terms to reflect policy

changes that have occurred since the

Beauty/Barber Supplies Guides were

last revised in 1968. The phrase

‘‘capacity and tendency or effect of

misleading or deceiving,’’ in §§ 248.1,

248.5, and 248.6, may be changed to

conform with the language regarding

deception that is set forth in Cliffdale

Associates, Inc., 103 F.T.C. 110 (1984),

and subsequent cases.

The Commission also may provide

updated notations to other Commission

guides which supplement the Beauty/

Barber Supplies Guides. Specifically, a

notation may be appended after § 248.0

to advise that certain ‘‘Industry

Members,’’ such as beauty schools,

beauty clinics, and barber schools, may

refer to the Commission’s Guides for

Private Vocational and Home Study

Schools, 16 CFR part 254, for additional

guidance. A notation may be inserted

following § 248.14 of the Beauty/Barber

Supplies Guides to indicate that the

Commission’s Guides for Advertising

Allowances and Other Merchandising

Payments and Services, 16 CFR part

240, furnish detailed guidance regarding

advertising or promotional allowances,

or services or facilities, and should be

considered as supplementing § 248.14.

In addition, the Beauty/Barber

Supplies Guides currently include, in

footnote 1 to § 248.1, a notation to the

Commission’s Guides Against Deceptive

Advertising of Guarantees, 16 CFR part

239. A second notation following

§ 248.4 of the Guides refers to the

Commission’s Guides Against Deceptive

Pricing, 16 CFR part 233. These

notations may be modified so that the

language contained therein will be

consistent.

Accordingly, the Commission solicits

public comments on the following

questions:

1. Is there a continuing need for the

Beauty/Barber Supplies Guides/

a. Do members of the beauty and

barber equipment and supplies industry

require these industry-specific guides

for information about applicable legal

standards, or can equally helpful

guidance be obtained from more general

sources such as the Fred Meyer guides,

16 CFR part 240?

b. What benefits have the Guides

provided to purchasers of the products

or services affected by the Guides?

c. Have the Guides imposed costs on

purchasers?

d. Do the Guides continue to address

practices which are of concern to

members of the beauty and barber

equipment and supplies industry?

2. What changes, if any, should be

made to the Guides to increase the

benefits of the Guides to purchasers?

a. How would these changes affect the

costs the Guides impose on firms

subject to their requirements?

3. What significant burdens or costs,

including costs of adherence, have the

Guides imposed on firms subject to their

requirements?

a. Have the Guides provided benefits

to such firms?

4. What changes, if any, should be

made to the Guides to reduce the

burdens or costs imposed on firms

subject to their requirements?

a. How would these changes affect the

benefits provided by the Guides?

5. Do the Guides overlap or conflict

with other federal, state, or local laws or

regulations?

6. Since the Guides were issued, what

effects, if any, have changes in relevant

technology or economic conditions had

on the Guides?

Authority: 15 U.S.C. 41–58.

List of Subjects in 16 CFR Part 248

Advertising, Trade practices,

Deceptive pricing, Price discrimination,

Promotional allowances.
17034 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 64 / Tuesday, April 4, 1995 / Proposed Rules

By direction of the Commission.

Donald S. Clark,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–8189 Filed 4–3–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6750–01–M

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[OH69–1–6680b; FRL–5175–3]

Approval and Promulgation of

Implementation Plans Ohio; Enhanced

Motor Vehicle Inspection and

Maintenance Program

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (USEPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: The USEPA is taking action to

approve, through a direct final

procedure, the State implementation

plan (SIP) revision submitted by the

State of Ohio for the purpose of

controlling the motor vehicle emissions

of hydrocarbons. Emissions will be

controlled by implementing an

enhanced inspection and maintenance

(I/M) program in areas classified as

moderate nonattainment. The State

currently operates I/M programs in the

Cleveland and Cincinnati areas to

achieve reductions in emissions of

carbon monoxide and volatile organic

compounds. The program proposed here

calls for enhanced I/M in the

metropolitan areas of Cleveland-AkronLorain, Cincinnati, and DaytonSpringfield which are moderate

nonattainment areas for ozone.

Moderate nonattainment areas are

required to implement a basic I/M

program. These areas have opted up to

enhanced I/M because of the greater

cost-effective emission reduction

available compared to basic programs.

The USEPA is approving the State’s I/

M SIP revision as a direct final rule

without prior proposal because the

USEPA views this as a noncontroversial

action and anticipates no critical or

adverse comments.

In the final rules section of this

Federal Register, USEPA is approving

the State’s SIP revision request as a

direct final rule without prior proposal

because USEPA views the approval of

the inspection and maintenance

program as noncontroversial and

anticipates no adverse comments. A

detailed rationale for the approval is set

forth in the direct final rule. If no

adverse or critical comments are

received in response to the direct final

rule, no further activity is contemplated

in regards to this proposed rule. If

USEPA receives adverse comments, the

direct final rule will be withdrawn and

all public comments received will be

addressed in a subsequent final rule

based on this proposed rule. The

USEPA will institute a second comment

period on this action only if warranted

by revisions to the rulemaking based on

comments received. Any parties

interested in commenting on this notice

should do so at this time.

DATES: Comments must be received on

or before May 4, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should

be mailed to: William L. MacDowell,

Chief, Regulation Development Section,

Air Enforcement Branch (AE–17J),

United States Environmental Protection

Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson

Blvd., Chicago, Illinois 60604

Copies of the State submittal and

USEPA’s analysis of it are available for

inspection at: Regulation Development

Section, Air Enforcement Branch (AE–

17J), United States Environmental

Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West

Jackson Blvd., Chicago, Illinois 60604.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John

Paskevicz, at the above address or call

(312) 886–6084.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For

additional information see the direct

final rule published in the rules section

of this Federal Register.

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401–7671(q).

Dated: March 10, 1995.

Valdas V. Adamkus,

Regional Administrator.

[FR Doc. 95–8222 Filed 4–3–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

40 CFR Parts 52 and 81

[IL116–1–6792b; FRL–5182–4]

Approval and Promulgation of

Implementation Plans and Designation

of Areas for Air Quality Planning

Purposes; Illinois

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: The United States

Environmental Protection Agency

(USEPA) is approving a State

Implementation Plan (SIP) revision

request to redesignate two sulfur

dioxide (SO2) nonattainment areas in

the State of Illinois to attainment. The

USEPA is also approving their

accompanying maintenance plans as SIP

revisions. The redesignation requests

and maintenance plans were submitted

by the Illinois Environmental Protection

Agency (IEPA) for the following SO2

nonattainment areas: Peoria County

(Hollis and Peoria Townships) and

Tazewell County (Groveland

Township). The State has met the

requirements for redesignation

contained in the Clean Air Act (the Act),

as amended in 1990. The redesignation

requests are based on ambient

monitoring data that show no violations

of the SO2 National Ambient Air Quality

Standard (NAAQS). In the final rules

section of this Federal Register, the

USEPA is approving the State’s

redesignation requests and the

supporting maintenance plans as a

direct final rule without prior proposal

because USEPA views this as a

noncontroversial revision amendment

and anticipates no adverse comments. A

detailed rationale for the approval is set

forth in the direct final rule. If no

adverse comments are received in

response to that direct final rule, no

further activity is contemplated in

relation to this proposed rule. If USEPA

receives adverse comments, the direct

final rule will be withdrawn and all

public comments received will be

addressed in a subsequent final rule

based on this proposed rule. USEPA

will not institute a second comment

period on this notice. Any parties

interested in commenting on this notice

should do so at this time. Adverse

comments received concerning a

specific geographic area, Peoria or

Tazewell Counties, will only affect this

final rule as it pertains to that area and

only the portion of this final rule

concerning the area receiving adverse

comments will be withdrawn.

DATES: Comments on this proposed rule

must be received on or before May 4,

1995.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should

be mailed to: J. Elmer Bortzer, Chief,

Regulatory Development Section,

Regulatory Development Branch (AR18–

J), U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson

Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.

Copies of the State submittal and

USEPA’s analysis of it are available for

inspection at: Regulatory Development

Section, Regulatory Development

Branch (AR18–J), U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West

Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois

60604.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Fayette Bright, Environmental

Protection Specialist, Regulatory

Development Section, Regulatory

Development Branch (AR18–J), U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency,

Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,

Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–6069.