alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 66 (Thursday, April 6, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 17602]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8455]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster Loan Area #2767]


 Pennsylvania; Declaration of Disaster Loan Area

    Montgomery County and the contiguous counties of Berks, Bucks, 
Chester, Delaware, Lehigh, and Philadelphia in the State of 
Pennsylvania constitute a disaster area as a result of damages caused 
by a fire which occurred on March 7, 1995 in Norristown Borough. 
Applications for loans for physical damages as a result of this 
disaster may be filed until the close of business on May 30, 1995, and 
for economic injury until the close of business on January 2, 1996, at 
the address listed below: U.S. Small Business Administration, Disaster 
Area 1 Office, 360 Rainbow Blvd. South, 3rd Floor, Niagara Falls, NY 
14303, or other locally announced locations.
    The interest rates are:

                                                                        
                                                                Percent 
                                                                        
For Physical Damage:                                                    
  Homeowners with credit available elsewhere.................      8.000
  Homeowners without credit available elsewhere..............      4.000
  Businesses with credit available elsewhere.................      8.000
  Businesses and non-profit organizations without credit                
   available elsewhere.......................................      4.000
  Others (including non-profit organizations) with credit               
   available elsewhere.......................................      7.125
For economic Injury:                                                    
  Businesses and small agricultural cooperatives without                
   credit available elsewhere................................      4.000
                                                                        

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 276705 
and for economic injury the number is 849800.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008.)

    Dated: March 30, 1995.
Philip Lader,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 95-8455 Filed 4-5-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM [Identify
specific financial  statements] AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         896778
<NAME>                        Conceptus, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     USD
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                     1
<CASH>                                         11,503
<SECURITIES>                                    5,568
<RECEIVABLES>                                     139
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (661)
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               17,275
<PP&E>                                          2,935
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,544)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 19,031
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             775
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       63,410
<OTHER-SE>                                          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   19,031
<SALES>                                           449
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  449
<CGS>                                           1,702
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   1,702
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                9,666
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  5
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,665)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,665)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,665)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.01)
        

</TABLE>
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5257 

To amend the Agricultural Credit Act of 1978 to enhance the long-term 

protection of watersheds, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 22, 2023 

Mr. NUNN of Iowa (for himself, Mr. DAVIS of North Carolina, and Mr. JACKSON of Illinois) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Agricultural Credit Act of 1978 to enhance 

the long-term protection of watersheds, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 Section 403 of the Agricultural Credit Act of 1978 

5 (16 U.S.C. 2203) is amended— 

6 (1) by redesignating subsection (b) as sub7 section (c); and 

8 (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the fol9 lowing: 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5257 IH

1 ‘‘(b) LEVEL OF RESTORATION.—The Secretary may 

2 allow restoration above pre-disaster conditions if that res3 toration is in the best interest of the long-term health and 

4 protection of the watershed.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5104 

To amend the National Dam Safety Program Act to reauthorize that Act, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 1, 2023 

Mr. EDWARDS (for himself, Ms. KUSTER, Mr. WILLIAMS of New York, Ms. 

SCHRIER, Mr. NEWHOUSE, and Mr. MOOLENAAR) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 

Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend the National Dam Safety Program Act to 

reauthorize that Act, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Dam Safety 

5 Program Reauthorization Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF NATIONAL DAM SAFETY 

7 PROGRAM. 

8 Section 14 of the National Dam Safety Program Act 

9 (33 U.S.C. 467j) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5104 IH

1 (1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ‘‘2023’’ and 

2 inserting ‘‘2028’’; 

3 (2) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘2023’’ and 

4 inserting ‘‘2028’’; 

5 (3) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘2023’’ and 

6 inserting ‘‘2028’’; 

7 (4) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘2023’’ and 

8 inserting ‘‘2028’’; 

9 (5) in subsection (e), by striking ‘‘2023’’ and 

10 inserting ‘‘2028’’; and 

11 (6) in subsection (f), by striking ‘‘2023’’ and 

12 inserting ‘‘2028’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5211 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5211

  To prohibit funds from being used to implement the Internet Covert 
 Operations Program under the United States Postal Inspection Service, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 15, 2023

  Mr. Gaetz introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit funds from being used to implement the Internet Covert 
 Operations Program under the United States Postal Inspection Service, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``USPIS Surveillance Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    The Congress finds as follows:
            (1) The United States Postal Service has been operating a 
        clandestine domestic surveillance program of Americans' social 
        media activity known as the Internet Covert Operations Program 
        (iCOP).
            (2) iCOP is part of the United States Postal Inspection 
        Service which is the law enforcement and security component of 
        USPS.
            (3) A March 25, 2022, report by the USPS Inspector General 
        stated: ``We determined that certain proactive searches iCOP 
        conducted using an open-source intelligence tool from February 
        to April 2021 exceeded the Postal Inspection Service's law 
        enforcement authority''.
            (4) The USP Inspection Service is operating outside of its 
        USPS jurisdiction when it monitors internet users' sharing of 
        information as its jurisdiction is narrowly defined within 
        postal mail only.
            (5) The iCOP program is a violation of privacy; it 
        encroaches upon the private lives of Americans and seeks to 
        curb constitutional rights of the First Amendment.
            (6) iCOP is not only illegal for operating outside of its 
        stated jurisdiction, but also politically motivated in its 
        target.

SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON FUNDING OF PROGRAM.

    No Federal funds (including amounts available in the Postal Service 
Fund established under section 2003 of title 39, United States Code) 
may be used to implement, conduct, or otherwise carry out the Internet 
Covert Operations Program operated by the United States Postal 
Inspection Service or any other domestic surveillance program with 
targets that do not have an identified connection to the mail, postal 
crimes, or the security of Postal Service facilities or personnel, or 
with politically motivated targets.
                                 <all>
```
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6275

BorgWarner, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5791

Tianhai Electric North America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6860

Ice Qube, Inc: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions.

pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6959

Ledvance LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
[ J

- 22

- 2019 ] [MO: Wecht, J. ]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

US AIRWAYS, INC. AND SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.,

Appellants

v.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (BOCKELMAN),

Appellees :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 35 WAP 2018

Appeal from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court entered February 22, 2018 at No. 612 CD 2017, affirming the Order of the Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

da ted April 19, 2017 at No. A16

- 0545.

ARGUED: May 14, 2019

CONCURRING O PINION

JUSTICE DOUGHERTY DECIDED: NOVEMBER 20, 2019

I concur in the result reached by the majority. I write separately to note my concern

that the majority’s opinion might be read as expanding Epler v. N orth American Rockwell

Corp. , 393 A.2d 1163 (Pa. 1978)

, to all avenues of ingress to and egress from the

workplace. I do not appro ve of such a broad reading, and thus emphasize the majority’s

holding is limited to the discrete facts of this case. Majority Opinion, slip op. at 13

.

Specifically, the record reveals US Airways was legally obligated to reimburse

claimant for parking expenses under the applicable collective bargaining agreement

, and

ostensibly complied wi th this contractual obligation by purchasing the required SIDA

badge for claimant and thereby sponsoring her airport parking

. Moreover , due to the

expansive geographical size of the Philadelphia International Airport (and the strict

security requirements inherent in modern

- day airport terminal access)

, when c laimant[ J

- 22

- 2019 ] [MO: Wecht, J. ]

- 2

used the SIDA badge provided by her employer US Airways to enter the secure employee

parking lot , she had no realistic choice but to use the employee shuttle bus to enter and

exit from the terminal

— her workplace

. In my view, these circumstances in particular

indicate claimant’s use of the shuttle bus was connected with and integral to her

employer’s operations at the Philadelphia International Airport , and the Commonwealth

Court correctly determined she is entitled to workers’ compensation benefits as a result

of her injury on that bus

. 1

1 I respectfully distance myself from the majority’s unnecessary addit ional holding regarding the employee parking lot , which is not at issue in this appeal. See Majority Opinion, slip op. at 13 (“ Given these facts , we have little difficulty concluding that the parking lot and shuttle were connected with, and thus integral to, US Airways’ business operations at the Philadelphia International Airport

. ”) (emphasis added).
exhibit4_2.htm


    Exhibit 4.2

    
      
        

      

    

     

    

     

    May 10, 2010

     

    Securities and Exchange Commission

    100 F Street, NE

    Washington, DC 20549

     

    Re:  Capital Bank Corporation – Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
31, 2010

    
       

    

    Ladies and Gentlemen:

    
       

    

    Today, Capital Bank Corporation, a North Carolina corporation (the
“Company”), is filing its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2010 (the “Form 10-Q”) with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.

     

    Pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K, the Company hereby
agrees to furnish the SEC, upon request, copies of instruments and agreements
defining the rights of holders of its long-term debt, which are not being filed
as exhibits to the Form 10-Q. The total amount of securities issued under any
instrument of such long-term debt does not exceed 10% of the total assets of the
Company and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.

     

    Very truly yours,

     

    CAPITAL BANK CORPORATION

     

    
      
        	
                /s/ B. Grant
      Yarber

              	 
      


      

      B. Grant
Yarber

      President
and Chief Executive Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jerome Smalls, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the County Court, Nassau County (Orenstein, J.), imposed February 23, 1989, as amended April 17, 1990, upon his conviction of robbery in the first degree (two counts), robbery in the third degree, attempted robbery in the third degree, and grand larceny in the fourth degree (three counts), upon his plea of guilty, the resentence being an indeterminate term of 3 to 9 years’ imprisonment for each count of robbery *643in the first degree, 2 Vis to 7 years’ imprisonment for robbery in the third degree, *lió*to 4 years’ imprisonment for attempted robbery in the third degree, and 1 Vis to 4 years’ imprisonment for each count of grand larceny in the fourth degree, the sentence imposed on the second count of robbery in the first degree to run consecutive to the sentence imposed on the first count of robbery in the first degree, the sentence imposed for robbery in the third degree to run consecutive to the sentence imposed on the second count of robbery in the first degree, the sentence imposed for attempted robbery in the third degree to run consecutive to the sentence imposed for robbery in the third degree, and the sentence imposed on each count of grand larceny in the fourth degree to run concurrently to each other and concurrently to the sentence imposed on the first count of robbery in the first degree.

Ordered that the resentence, as amended, is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision that certain of the sentences shall run consecutively and substituting therefor a provision that all of the sentences shall run concurrently to one another; as so modified, the resentence is affirmed.

The court was without authority to vacate the sentence imposed February 24, 1988, upon the failure of the defendant to keep his promise to testify truthfully at the codefendant’s trial (CPL 430.10; *Matter of Campbell v Pesce,*60 NY2d 165; *see also, Matter of Kisloff v Covington,*73 NY2d 445). The People’s reliance on *Matter of Lockett v Juviler*(65 NY2d 182), is misplaced. That case merely reiterated the general principle that the courts possess the inherent power to vacate orders and judgments obtained by fraud or misrepresentation both in civil and in criminal cases. The action of the defendant herein did not come within this exception since a failure to perform a future act cannot be a predicate for a claim of fraud *(see, New York Fruit Auction Corp. v City of New York,*81 AD2d 159).

Accordingly, the resentence must be vacated and the original sentence, imposed February 24, 1988, reinstated to the extent that the original sentence provided that all sentences shall run concurrently to one another. Kunzeman, J. P., Harwood, Balletta and O’Brien, JJ., concur.