T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T DA NT E E S GU E R R A- DE VE R A, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 70734 A ge nc yN o. A 077- 302- 546 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d June 15, 2011 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , O ’ S C A N N L A IN , an dF IS H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. D ant e E s gue rr a - D e V e r a , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of the P hi l i ppi ne s , pe t i t i ons f or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ order di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l fr om an i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s de c i s i on de ny i ng hi s appl i c a t i on f ora s y l um , w i thhol di ng of r e m ova l , and r e l i e f

unde rthe C onve nt i on A ga i ns tT ortur e ( “ C A T ” ) . W e ha ve 

# FI LED JU N 29 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 70734 2 j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f ors ubs t ant i a l e vi de nc e the a g e n c y ’s f

in d in g s o f

f a c t, I N S v . E l i as - Zac ar i as , 50 2 U . S . 47 8, 48 1 (19 92 ) ( per c u r ia m ) , an dr e v ie w d e n o v o du e p r o c e s s c la im s , Ibarra-Flores v. G on zales , 439 F . 3 d6 1 4 , 6 2 0 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 6 ) . We d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T he evi dence does notcom pel the concl usi on thatE sguerr a- D e V er a s uf f e r e d pa s tpe r s e c ut i on orha s aw e l l f ounde d f e arof f utur e pe r s e c ut i on on a c c o u n t o f

h is s o c ia l g r o up , p o litic a l o p in io n , o ra n yo th e rp r o te c te dg r o u n d . See E l i as - Zac ar i as , 5 0 2 U .S . a t 4 8 1 - 8 4 , 4 8 1 n .1 ; Mo l i n a -Mo ra les v . I NS , 237 F . 3d 1048, 1051- 52 ( 9th C i r . 2001) ( pe r s ona l r e tr i but i on i s notpe r s e c ut i on on a c c ount o f a p ro t ect edg ro u n d ). A cco rd i n g l y, E sg u erra-D e V era’s asyl u m cl ai m fai l s. B e c aus e E s gue rr a - D e V e r af a i l e d t o m e e tthe l ow e rbur de n of pr oof f or a s y lu m , h is c la im f

o rw ith h o ld in g o f

r e m o v a l n e c e s s ar ilyf

a ils . See Zehat

ye v. G on zales , 45 3 F . 3d 11 82 , 11 90 (9th C i r. 20 06 ). E s g u e rr a - D e V e r af

a ils to r a is e a n ys ub s tan tiv e c h a lle n g e to th e d e n ia l o f h is C A T c la im . Se e M

a r t i n ez - Se rra n o v . I

NS , 94 F . 3d 1256, 1259- 60 ( 9th C i r . 1996) (i ss ues notaddres se d i n argum entpo rt i on of bri ef ar e dee m ed w ai ved). F i na l l y , E s gue rr a - D e V e r a ’ s due pr oc e s s c l a i m f a i l s be c aus e he ha s not d e m o n s tr a te dth a t h e s u f f e r e dp r e ju d ic e r e s u ltin g f

r o m a n ytr an s c r ip tio n e rr o r . See09- 70734 3 Ibarra-Flores , 4 3 9 F . 3 dat6 2 0 -2 1 (p rej u d i ce i s req u i redt o p rev ai l o n du e p ro cess cl ai m ). P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.