19040 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 72 / Friday, April 14, 1995 / Notices

MGE requests an effective date 60 days

from the filing date.

Comment date: April 20, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

31. Idaho Power Co.

[Docket No. ER95–795–000]

Take notice that on March 23, 1995,

Idaho Power Company (IPC), tendered

for filing an agreement dated February

6, 1995 providing for IPC to furnish

transmission service to Washington

Water Power Company and Sierra

Pacific Power Company.

Comment date: April 20, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

32. Northeast Utilities Service Co.

[Docket No. ER95–798–000]

Take notice that on March 27, 1995,

Northeast Utilities Service Company

(NUSCO), tendered for filing a Service

Agreement with Middleborough Gas

and Electric Department

(Middleborough) under the NU System

Companies System Power Sales/

Exchange Tariff No. 6.

NUSCO states that a copy of this filing

has been mailed to Middleborough.

NUSCO requests that the Service

Agreement become effective on April 1,

1995.

Comment date: April 20, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

33. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.

[Docket No. ER95–799–000]

Take notice that on March 27, 1995,

Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation

(Niagara Mohawk), tendered for filing

an agreement between Niagara Mohawk

and North American Energy

Conservation, Inc. (NAEC) dated March

23, 1995 providing for certain

transmission services to NAEC.

Copies of this filing were served upon

NAEC and the New York State Public

Service Commission.

Comment date: April 20, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs

E. Any person desiring to be heard or

to protest said filing should file a

motion to intervene or protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street, N.E.,

Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance

with Rules 211 and 214 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR

385.214). All such motions or protests

should be filed on or before the

comment date. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–9202 Filed 4–13–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

[Docket No. ER95–777–000, et al.]

Maine Public Service Co., et al.;

Electric Rate and Corporate Regulation

Filings

April 5, 1995.

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission:

1. Maine Public Service Co.

[Docket No. ER95–777–000]

Take notice that on March 21, 1995,

Maine Public Service Company (Maine

Public), filed an executed Service

Agreement with North American Energy

Conservation, Inc. Maine Public states

that the service agreement is being

submitted pursuant to its tariff

provision pertaining to the short-term

non-firm sale of capacity and energy

which establishes a ceiling rate at Maine

Public’s cost of service for the units

available for sale.

Maine Public requests that the service

agreement become effective on April 1,

1995 and requests waiver of the

Commission’s regulations regarding

filing.

Comment date: April 19, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

2. Jersey Central Power & Light Co.,

Metropolitan Edison Co. and

Pennsylvania Electric Co.

[Docket No. ER95–779–000]

Take notice that on March 21, 1995,

GPU Service Corporation (GPU), on

behalf of Jersey Central Power & Light

Company, Metropolitan Edison

Company and Pennsylvania Electric

Company (jointly referred to as the GPU

Operating Companies), filed an

executed Service Agreement between

GPU and PECO Energy Company

(PECO), dated March 6, 1995. This

Service Agreement specifies that PECO

has agreed to the rates, terms and

conditions of the GPU Operating

Companies’ Operating Capacity and/or

Energy Sales Tariff (Sales Tariff)

designated as FERC Electric Tariff,

Original Volume No. 1. The Sales Tariff

was accepted by the Commission by

letter order issued on February 10, 1995

in Jersey Central Power & Light Co.,

Metropolitan Edison Co. and

Pennsylvania Electric Co., Docket No.

ER95–276–000 and allows GPU and

PECO to enter into separately scheduled

transactions under which the GPU

Operating Companies will make

available for sale, surplus operating

capacity and/or energy at negotiated

rates that are no higher than the GPU

Operating Companies’ cost of service.

GPU requests a waiver of the

Commission’s notice requirements for

good cause shown and an effective date

of March 6, 1995 for the Service

Agreement.

GPU has served copies of the filing on

regulatory agencies in New Jersey and

Pennsylvania.

Comment date: April 19, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

3. Jersey Central Power & Light Co.,

Metropolitan Edison Co. and

Pennsylvania Electric Co.

[Docket No. ER95–780–000]

Take notice that on March 21, 1995,

GPU Service Corporation (GPU), on

behalf of Jersey Central Power & Light

Company, Metropolitan Edison

Company and Pennsylvania Electric

Company (jointly referred to as the GPU

Operating Companies), filed an

executed Service Agreement between

GPU and North American Energy

Conservation, Inc. (NAEC), dated March

8, 1995. This Service Agreement

specifies that NAEC has agreed to the

rates, terms and conditions of the GPU

Operating Companies’ Operating

Capacity and/or Energy Sales Tariff

(Sales Tariff) designated as FERC

Electric Tariff, Original Volume No. 1.

The Sales Tariff was accepted by the

Commission by letter order issued on

February 10, 1995 in Jersey Central

Power & Light Co., Metropolitan Edison

Co. and Pennsylvania Electric Co.,

Docket No. ER95–276–000 and allows

GPU and NAEC to enter into separately

scheduled transactions under which the

GPU Operating Companies will make

available for sale, surplus operating

capacity and/or energy at negotiated

rates that are no higher than the GPU

Operating Companies’ cost of service.

GPU requests a waiver of the

Commission’s notice requirements for

good cause shown and an effective date

of March 8, 1995 for the Service

Agreement.

GPU has served copies of the filing on

regulatory agencies in New Jersey and

Pennsylvania.
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 72 / Friday, April 14, 1995 / Notices 19041

1Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation’s

application was filed with the Commission under

Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act and Part 157 of

the Commission’s regulations.

2The receipt meter would be relocated pursuant

to section 2.55(d) of the Commission’s regulations.

Comment date: April 19, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

4. Northeast Utilities Service Co.

[Docket No. ER95–781–000]

Take notice that on March 21, 1995,

Northeast Utilities Service Company

(NUSCO), tendered for filing on behalf

of The Connecticut Light and Power

Company, Western Massachusetts

Electric Company, Holyoke Water

Power Company (including Holyoke

Power and Electric Company), and

Public Service Company of New

Hampshire (together, the NU System

Companies), a Fourth Amendment to

System Power Sales Agreement

(Amendment) with Bozrah Light and

Power Company (BL&P) and a Service

Agreement between NUSCO and the NU

System Companies for service under

NUSCO’s Short-Term Firm

Transmission Service Tariff No. 5. The

transaction extends the System Power

Sale from April 1, 1965 through the

earlier of June 30, 1995 or the last day

of the month in which the acquisition

of BL&P by The City of Groton

Department of Utilities is complete.

NUSCO requests that the rate

schedule become effective on April 1,

1995. NUSCO states that copies of the

rate schedule have been mailed or

delivered to the parties to the

Amendment.

Comment date: April 19, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

5. The Detroit Edison Co.

[Docket No. ES95–27–000]

Take notice that on March 27, 1995,

The Detroit Edison Company filed an

application under § 204 of the Federal

Power Act seeking authorization to

issue from time to time, on or before

May 31, 1997, in an aggregate principal

amount not to exceed $1 billion at any

one time outstanding, short-term debt

securities and promissory notes bearing

final maturities not to exceed two years.

Comment date: April 26, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

6. Crockett Cogeneration, A California

Limited Partnership

[Docket No. QF84–429–003]

On March 29, 1995, Crockett

Cogeneration, A California Limited

Partnership (Crockett Cogeneration), 500

N.E. Multnamah, Suite 900, Portland,

Oregon 9732, submitted for filing an

application for recertification of a

facility as a cogeneration facility

pursuant to § 292.207(b) of the

Commission’s Regulations. No

determination has been made that the

submittal constitutes a complete filing.

According to the applicant, the 240

MW natural gas-fired facility, now

under construction, is located at

Crockett, California, and consists of a

combustion turbine generator, a

separately fired heat recovery boiler,

and an extraction/condensing steam

turbine generator.

In Docket No. QF84–429–000, Pacific

Thermonetics, Inc. was initially granted

certification for a 195.8 MW natural gasfired topping-cycle cogeneration facility

to be located in Crockett, California, [29

FERC ¶ 62,044 (1984)]. In Docket No.

QF84–429–001, the applicant was

granted recertification for the

cogeneration facility to reflect changes

in the facility’s configuration, date of

operation, net electric power production

capacity, and the transfer of ownership

from Pacific Thermonetics to Crockett

Cogeneration, [60 FERC ¶ 62,258

(1992)]. In Docket No. QF84–429–002,

the applicant filed a notice of selfcertification concurrently with the filing

of this application. The instant

application is submitted to reflect

changes in the ownership of the facility

and inclusion of a 1.6 mile 230-kV

underground transmission line from the

plant switchyard to a transition station

located at Pacific Gas & Electric

Company’s overhead transmission line.

Comment date: May 15, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs

E. Any person desiring to be heard or

to protest said filing should file a

motion to intervene or protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street, NE.,

Washington, DC 20426, in accordance

with Rules 211 and 214 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR

385.214). All such motions or protests

should be filed on or before the

comment date. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–9203 Filed 4–13–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–001–P

[Docket No. CP95–240–000]

Columbia Gas Transmission Corp.;

Notice of Intent to Prepare an

Environmental Assessment for the

Proposed Line KA Replacement

Project and Request for Comments on

Environmental Issues

April 10, 1995.

The staff of the Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission (FERC or

Commission) will prepare an

environmental assessment (EA) that will

discuss the environmental impacts of

the construction, operation, and

abandonment of the facilities proposed

in the Line KA Replacement Project.1

This EA will be used by the

Commission in its decision-making

process to determine whether an

environmental impact statement is

necessary and whether to approve the

project.

Summary of the Proposed Project

Columbia Gas Transmission

Corporation (Columbia) proposes to

construct and operate approximately

12.1 miles of 24-inch-diameter pipeline

to replace approximately 11 miles of its

existing 20-inch-diameter Main Line KA

in Wyoming and Raleigh Counties, West

Virginia. These actions would improve

the safety, reliability, and efficiency of

Columbia’s pipeline system. The

replacement would be done in two

segments as follows:

Segment 1

• Construct about 7.0 miles of

replacement pipeline.

• Abandon 1.9 miles of existing Line

KA by removal.

• Abandon in place 3.8 miles of

existing Line KA.

• Transfer 0.7 mile of existing Line

KA to low-pressure transmission

service.

• Construct about 0.1 mile of 8-inchdiameter pipeline to tie the existing

Line KA–26 into the replacement

pipeline.

• Relocate an existing receipt meter

from Cabot Oil and Gas Corporation

about 1500 feet to the south to tie it into

the replacement pipeline.2

Segment 2

• Construct about 5.1 miles of

replacement pipeline.

• Abandon 4.6 miles of existing 20-

inch-diameter Line KA by removal