alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w22w1








Exhibit 10.22.1




WAGE STRUCTURE CHANGE AGREEMENT

In Madrid on December 30, 2009




UNITED



On one hand Ms. Maria Elena Ross, NIE X-8039895-S, as the legal representative of the company
Energy Recovery Iberia, S.L. (hereinafter “ERI”) with CIF B-84798347 and registered in Ctra Barajas
24 — 28108 Alcobendas (Madrid)



And on the other hand, with DNI 05406047-N (hereinafter “Employee”) acting in his own name and
right, as an employee of the company Energy Recovery Iberia, S.L. 



DECLARE





	 	1.	 	That the employee provides professional services for Energy Recovery Iberia, S.
L. since August 1, 2007.
	 
	 	2. 	 	 That the annual gross salary that the employee currently receives as consideration
for his services is 253,000, — €, that its distribution in wage concepts is as
reflected in the attached list (Annex I) and its payment according to contract.




The parties, by mutual agreement, confirm: i) That on October 1, 2009 ERI offered to their staff a
private health insurance and life insurance as fringe benefits, to which the employee voluntarily
acceded; ii) that according to company policy, monthly amounts of health insurance premiums will be
shared betweeen both parties as follows; ERI will pay 70% and Employee pays 30% of the premium. In
this case, the employee will also pay by his own choice the difference with his private premium
“Mundi”; iii) that the premiums or contributions may change at any time, without previous
notice being required.



The parties, taking into account the above,



AGREE





	 	1.	 	That effectively 1st October 2009 the annual salary the employee receives at present
suits in its distribution as detailed in the attached list (Annex II).
	 
	 	2.	 	The parties agree that all those working conditions that have not been amended as a
result of this agreement will remain under the same terms as now, unless they are modified
by law or agreement.
	 
	 	3.	 	In the event that, for whatever reason, one or more of the clauses of this Agreement
should turn unenforceable in the future, only the clause in question will turn invalid,
and the remainder of the agreement will remain fully applicable.






	And in proof of compliance, this agreement is being signed in duplicate at the place and date
indicated above.





	 	 	 

	Maria Elena Ross

	 	Borja Sánches-Blanco Carvajal
	Energy Recovery Iberia, S.L.

	 	Employee
	/s/ Maria Elena Ross

	 	/s/ Borja S. Blanco
t A t B1 1 0531 1 00000000 

# 348332 51 •30 

I t 

00000000112901 

rodieol Pon Body Itlititlql 

r•J 

o 

o 

38382 

o 

Gradient Pan Removable Top DecIi Asernbly #litartAtuMaP 

I 

# 

4 

efilStf 

itIN 

06/1"1 804-2000 R. g 

0.5-3 >3-8 >6-30 >30-120 >120-400 >400-1000 >1000-2000 >2000-4000 

4'411\,t ±0.10 ±0. 10 ±0.20 ±0.30 ±0.50 0 80 1 20 ±2.00 

*4t 

# 

ti fi 

TG53.1I
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and accompanies the annual
report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Form 10-K") of
Dearborn Bancorp, Inc. (the "Issuer").

      I, Michael J. Ross, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Issuer,
certify that:

      (i)   The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
            or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
            78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

      (ii)  The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

Dated: March 8, 2006
                                              /s/ Michael J. Ross
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                                     Michael J. Ross
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer,
                                                    Dearborn Bancorp, Inc.
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXA S

N O S . W R - 8 4 , 6 4 8 - 0 1 & - 0 2 & - 0 3 E X P A R T E R E E D L E W I S R O B E R T S , A p p l i c a n t O N A P P L I C A T I O N S F O R W R I T S O F H A B E A S C O R P U S C A U S E N O S . 4 9 0 9 - A & 4 9 5 4 - A & 4 9 5 3 - A I N T H E 2 1 6 D I S T R I C T C O U R T T H F R O M K E N D A L L C O U N T Y A L C A L A , J., fi led a concurring opin ion . CONCURR ING

OP INION I join this Court’s rema

nd order be cause I ag ree with its observa tion that applicant has alleg ed fac ts that “if true, might entitle h i m to relief .” Be cause applicant has pleade d a colora ble ineffe ctive-a ssistance-of

-c o u n s e l c la im, I would order the habea s court on rema nd to appoint counsel for him upon reque st if he is indig ent, reg ardle ss of whether the trial court holds a hear ing. See Ex p a r te P o in te r , 492 S.W .3d 318, 320-21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2016) (per curia m) (Alca la, J ., concur ring ). At a minimum , h o weve r, in addition to the order ’s curr ent admonition that the appointment of counsel is mandatory for an indige nt applicant upon reque st if the habea s court holds a h ea ri ng , I would include a further admonishment that an indige nt applicant is “entitled” to the appointment of counsel upon reque st “if the court conclude s that the interests of justice require repr esenta tion.” See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . A R T . 1.051(d). Filed: Oc tober 5, 2016 Do Not Publish
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5195 

To repeal the District of Columbia Home Rule Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 11, 2023 

Mr. OGLES (for himself, Mr. DONALDS, and Mr. ROSENDALE) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to 

be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 

concerned 

A BILL 

To repeal the District of Columbia Home Rule Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Seat of Government 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HOME RULE 

7 ACT. 

8 The District of Columbia Home Rule Act (sec. 1– 

9 201.01 et seq., D.C. Official Code) is hereby repealed. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
EXHIBIT 10.1


 


(Translation;
for Reference Only)


 


First
Addendum to General Credit Facility Agreement


(Ref
No. 98-338)


 


1.        This Addendum is the first addendum to the Credit
Facility Agreement (Ref No. 98-338, the “Agreement”)
entered into by and between Hardinge Machine Tools B.V., Taiwan Branch (the “Applicant”) and Mega International
Commercial Bank Co., Ltd. (the “Bank”)
dated October 30, 2009.


 


2.        The Applicant hereby applies for the Bank’s approval
to amend part of the provisions under the Agreement as follows:


 


(1)   The total amount of the credit facilities extended
under the Agreement is changed to Five Million U.S. Dollars (US$5,000,000) or
its equivalent in other currencies.


 


(2)   The credit line extended for purchase of raw materials
and export business under the Agreement is each changed to Five Million U.S.
Dollars (US$5,000,000) or its equivalent in other currencies.


 


(3)   The Applicant may apply to draw down on the loan for
export business by submitting export purchase orders in an amount up to Three
Million Five Hundred Thousand U.S. Dollars (US$3,500,000) or its equivalent in
other currencies.


 


3.        The joint and several guarantor hereby consents to the
amendments prescribed above and agrees to continuously bear joint and several
liabilities until all debts are fully settled.


 


4.        This Addendum constitutes a part of the Agreement and
has the same validity as the Agreement.


 


5.        All other terms and conditions set forth under the
Agreement remain unchanged and in full force and effect.


 


	
  BANK:

  	
   

  
	
  Mega International Commercial Bank Co., Ltd.

  	
   

  
	
  /S/ C.H. TSAI

  	
   

  
	
  Responsible Person: C.H. Tsai, Manager of Nantou
  Branch

  	
   

  
	
  Address: No. 45, Wenchen Street, Nantou City

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  APPLICANT:

  	
   

  
	
  Hardinge Machine Tools B.V., Taiwan Branch

  	
   

  
	
  /S/ J. R. HO

  	
   

  
	
  Branch Manager and Litigious Agent: J.R. Ho

  	
   

  
	
  Uniform No. 28439919

  	
   

  
	
  Address: No. 4, Tse-Chiang San Road, Nantou
  City

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  JOINT AND SEVERAL GUARANTOR:

  	
   

  
	
  Hardinge Taiwan Precision Machinery Limited

  	
   

  
	
  Uniform No. 16830143

  	
   

  
	
  Address: No. 4, Tse-Chiang San Road, Nantou
  City
Exhibit23.1

 

**Consentof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

** **

** **

The Boardof Directors of Alamo Group Inc.

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theregistration statements Nos. 33-91804, 333-88454 and 333-143216 on Form S-8 ofAlamo Group Inc. of our reports dated March 14, 2011, with respect to theconsolidated balance sheets of Alamo Group Inc. and subsidiaries as of December31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of income,stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2010 and2009, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as ofDecember 31, 2010, which reports appear in the December 31, 2010 annual reporton Form 10-K of Alamo Group Inc.

 

Our report on the consolidated financial statements refersto the Company’s adoption of Accounting Standards Topic 805, *BusinessCombinations* during the year ended December 31, 2009.

 

 

 

| San  Antonio, Texas	March 14,  2011 | /s/KPMG  LLP   |
|-------------------------------------|----------------|
|                                |  

  |
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.7

                   Consent of Independent Public Accountants

     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
of our reports, included in this Form 10-KSB into the Company's previously filed
Registration Statements (File No.'s 33-89436, 33-89438, 33-89440, 33-97648,
33-97650, 33-58334-FW, 33-91278, 33-97646, 33-05025, 333-47781 and 333-69363).

                              ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 31, 1998
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of iVoice Technology, Inc. ("the
Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Mark
Meller, President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
          the Company.


Date: May 15, 2006

                                             By /s/ Mark Meller
                                             ---------------------
                                             Mark Meller
                                             President, Chief Executive Officer
                                             and Chief Financial Officer
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3060

TriMas Corporation:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5979

Aisin World Corp. of America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-2184

Braeburn Systems LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

“Made in China 2025” or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 26, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-4486

Zipline International Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5540

Tianhai Electric North America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3430

Scosche Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-6833

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TERRANCE LAMAR WIGGINS, a/k/a T-Wig, a/k/a Barnwell,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. 

Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (1:12-cr-00333-CMC-1)

Submitted: March 28, 2024 Decided: April 2, 2024

Before KING and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terrance Lamar Wiggins, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6833 Doc: 12 Filed: 04/02/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Terrance Lamar Wiggins appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for 

compassionate release, brought pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), as amended by the 

First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239. After 

reviewing the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in 

denying Wiggins’ motion. See United States v. Brown, 78 F.4th 122, 127 (4th Cir. 2023)

(stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United 

States v. Wiggins, No. 1:12-cr-00333-CMC-1 (D.S.C. July 25, 2023). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6833 Doc: 12 Filed: 04/02/2024 Pg: 2 of 2