alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Organization Name:

Note: Representatives submitting on behalf of an organization must enter information below.

Requestor Representative:

Section 301 Investigation: China's Acts, Policies, and Practices Related to Technology 

Transfer, Intellectual Property, and Innovation - Form to Request Exclusion of Product

When submitting a product exclusion request using this form, enter the specified 

information in the following fields and explain the basis and rationale for your statements. 

By completing this form, you certify that the information provided is complete and 

correct to the best of your knowledge. 

1. Indicate whether the comment contains business confidential information (BCI), is a public

document, or is a public version of a BCI document.

3.

2. Please provide a complete and detailed description of the product of concern:

4.

5. Requestor's relationship to the product:

CONTINUED BELOW

*

10-digit HTSUS item number* for product you wish to address in this product exclusion request:

Use numerical characters only with no special characters (example: 1023456789). For help in finding 

the HTSUS item number associated with your product, see https://hts.usitc.gov/

1

7.

6. Does this submission in regulations.gov include additional attachments?

Please indicate whether any additional attachment contains business confidential

information (BCI), is a public document, or is a public version of a BCI document.

VERSION 1

Requestor Information

Requestor Name (Last, First):

Public Version of BCI

HCL1502, 168 ton Capacity, 1.97 in Stroke, Single-Acting, High Tonnage, Lock Nut Hydraulic 

Cylinder; Maximum Operating Pressure psi: 10000; Weight Kgs: 59; Oil Capacity Advance cm3: 

1069; Stroke Ranges mm: 48 - 94

8412210075 Schmidt, Jackie Enerpac Jackie SchmidtImporter Yes Contains BCI
END 2

8. Is this product, or a comparable product, available from sources in the United States?:

VERSION 1

11. Please provide information in support your request, taking account of the instructions

provided in Section B of the Federal Register notice (note: text entered below can extend

beyond the apparent size of this box).

9. Is this product, or a comparable product, available from sources in third countries?:

10. Please provide the value and quantity (with units) of the Chinese-origin product of concern

that you purchased for each calendar year specified. Limit this figure to the products

purchased by your firm (or by members of your trade association) alone. Please provide 

estimates if precise figures are unavailable.

2016 Value:

2015 Value:

2017 Value:

2016 Quantity:

2015 Quantity:

2017 Quantity:

No No BCI BCI BCI BCI BCI BCI

See addendum for additional information.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined th a t

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 98-50211 Summary Calendar

_____________________

FREDERICO FIERRO,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

KENNETH S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-94-CV-822

_________________________________________________________________

November 3, 1998

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Frederico Fierro appeals the affirmance of the Commissioner’s

d ecision denying him social security disability and supplemental

income benefits.

Fierro argues that the administrative law judge (“ALJ”) failed

to consider nonexertional impairments, namely, hearing loss,

depression, and a history of somatizatio n, as well as the

exertional limitati on to Fierro’s right elbow. Because Fierro

failed to raise this argument before the Appeals Council, and thus2

failed to exhaust his administrative remedies, we have no

jurisdiction to consider the matter. S ee Paul v. Shalala

, 29 F.3d

208, 210 (5th Cir. 1994).

Fierro challenges the ALJ’s consideration of his complaints of

chronic pain. Our review of the record reveals that the ALJ

applied the correct legal standard by utilizing the correct

analysis and that the determination concerning Fierro’s subjective

complaints of pain is supported by substantial evidence. S ee Falco

v. Shalala

, 27 F.3d 160, 163 (5th Cir. 1994); Wren v. Sullivan

, 925

F.2d 123, 128 (5th Cir. 1991); Anderson v. Sullivan

, 887 F.2d 630,

633-34 (5th Cir. 1989).

F ierro also argues that the report by Dr. Charles Par ker

should have been considered as new evidence. We find no error by

the district court in refusing to remand the case to the

Commissioner. S ee Haywood v. Sullivan

, 888 F.2d 1463, 1471-72 (5th

Cir. 1989).

A F F I R M E D.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MARCH 28,
1999 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-28-1999
<CASH>                                           1,229
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,068
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,027
<INVENTORY>                                      5,893
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,081
<PP&E>                                           7,341
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,207
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,324
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,319
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            38
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,967
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,324
<SALES>                                         19,218
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,218
<CGS>                                           17,856
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,856
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,682
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 146
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (14,363)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (690)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (13,673)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (13,673)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (3.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.64)


</TABLE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6712

BYD Motors, Inc:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/84_FR_21389.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
a6257555ex10-2.htm


Exhibit 10.2







Executive Compensation Recoupment Policy












On March 26, 2010, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Ford Motor Company formally adopted a policy of recoupment of compensation in certain circumstances.  The purpose of this policy is to help ensure executives act in the best interests of the Company.  The policy requires all Company officers to repay or return cash bonuses and/or equity awards in the event:  (i) the Company issues a material restatement of its financial statements and where the restatement was caused by an employee's intentional misconduct; (ii) the employee was found to be in violation of non-compete provisions of any plan or agreement; or (iii) the employee has committed ethical or criminal violations.  The Compensation Committee will consider all relevant factors and exercise business judgment in determining any appropriate amounts to recoup and has the discretion to determine the timing and form of recoupment.  The policy will apply to the Annual Incentive Compensation Plan beginning with the 2010 performance period and equity awards beginning with grants made in 2011.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

April 12, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6570

Apex Sourcing & Manufacturing: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_04.15.19.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Or(ler issued 1.)ecembei 13. 2012

In The 

## (!tLfltrt Lit 

## ppiai% .iitt 

## Jiitrirt t•it 

## iixt at 1at1a No. 05-12-01373-CV IN REJUSTIN LEE ASKEW, Relator Original Proceeding from the 204th Judicial District Court I)allas County, Texas Trial CourtCause No. F05-51334-Q 

### ORDER BeforeJustices Moseley, FitzGerald, and Myers Based on the 

### Court’s opinion of

### this date, we I)ISMISS relators petition for writ of mandamus. 

### We ORDER that relatorbear the costs 

### ofthis original proceeding. /

- — __; FR’1 FIFZGERALD

JJE /
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 66 (Thursday, April 6, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 17610]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8596]





                Sunshine Act Meetings



Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 66 / Thursday, April 6, 1995 / 
Sunshine Act Meetings
[[Page 17610]] 


UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION



Record of Vote of Meeting Closure (Public Law 94-409) (5 U.S.C. 
Sec. 552b)

    I, Edward F. Reilly, Jr., Chairman of the United States Parole 
Commission, presided at a meeting of said Commission which started at 
approximately nine o'clock a.m. on Tuesday, March 27, 1995 at the 
Commission's Central Office, 5550 Friendship Boulevard, Chevy Chase, 
Maryland 20815. The purpose of the meeting was to decide five appeals 
from National Commissioners' decisions pursuant to 28 C.F.R. Section 
2.27. Six Commissioners were present, constituting a quorum when the 
vote to close the meeting was submitted.
    Public announcement further describing the subject matter of the 
meeting and certifications of General Counsel that this meeting may be 
closed by vote of the Commissioners present were submitted to the 
Commissioners prior to the conduct of any other business. Upon motion 
duly made, seconded, and carried, the following Commissioners voted 
that the meeting be closed: Edward F. Reilly, Jr., Carol Pavilack 
Getty, Jasper Clay, Jr., Vincent J. Fechtel, Jr., John R. Simpson, and 
Michael J. Gaines.
    In Witness Whereof, I make this official record of the vote taken 
to close this meeting and authorize this record to be made available to 
the public.

    Dated: March 3, 1995.
Edward F. Reilly, Jr.,

Chairman, U.S. Parole Commission.

[FR Doc. 95-8596 Filed 4-4-95; 11:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 72 (Friday, April 14, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 19070]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8783]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration for Children and Families


Agency Information Collection Under OMB Review

    Title: Evaluation of the National Head Start/Public School Early 
Childhood Transition Demonstration Project.
    OMB No.: 0980-0240.
    Description: This is a series of standardized instruments and 
interview forms for use with children, parents, teachers, and 
principals participating in the national evaluation of the Head Start/
Public School Early Transition demonstration program. The evaluation is 
designed to determine the impact of the demonstration project on the 
participating children, families and schools.
    Respondents: Individuals or households, and State Government.
    Estimate of total annual reporting and recordkeeping burden:
    Respondents: 26,364.
    Number of Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Total Annual Responses: 26,364.
    Average Burden per Response: 1.26.
    Estimated Annual Burden: 33,288.
    Additional Information: Copies of the request for approval may be 
obtained from Bob Sargis of the Office of Information Resource 
Management, ACF, by calling (202) 690-7275.
    OMB Comment: Consideration will be given to comments and 
suggestions received within 30 days of publication. Written comments 
and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be 
sent directly to the following: Office of Management and Budget, 
Paperwork Reduction Project, 725 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20503, Attn: Ms. Wendy Taylor.

    Dated: April 3, 1995.
Roberta Katson,
Acting Director, Office of Information Resource Management.
[FR Doc. 95-8783 Filed 4-13-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-M
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Stephen R. SHELL, Appellant. Stephen R. SHELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. WD 48912, WD 50848.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Feb. 27, 1996.

Rearing Denied April 2, 1996.

Susan M. Hunt, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Jefferson City, Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before SPINDEN, P.J., and BERREY and LAURA DENVIR STITH, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from convictions of burglary in the first degree, § 569.160 RSMo 1986, armed criminal action, § 571.015 RSMo 1986, robbery in the first degree, § 569.020 RSMo 1986, two counts of forcible rape, § 566.030 RSMo Supp.1992, two counts of forcible sodomy, § 566.060 RSMo 1992, the sentences imposed therefrom as well as denial of Rule 29.15 motion.

Affirmed. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4264

Tianhai Electric North America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21
 
                            ENVIROTEST SYSTEMS CORP.
 
                         ENVIROTEST TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                                  SUBSIDIARIES
 
                            ENVIROTEST SYSTEMS CORP.
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SUBSIDIARY                                                   JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
----------------------------------------------------------   -------------------------------
<S>                                                          <C>
Envirotest Technologies, Inc.(1)                             Delaware
Envirotest Systems (B.C.) Ltd.(4)                            British Columbia
403564 B.C. Ltd.(1)                                          British Columbia
Envirotest Canada(2)                                         British Columbia
Envirotest Partners(3)                                       Pennsylvania (Partnership)
Remote Sensing Technologies, Inc.(1)                         Delaware
Envirotest Wisconsin Inc.(1)                                 Wisconsin
Systems Control, Inc.(1)                                     Washington
ES Funding Corp.(1)                                          Delaware
Envirotest Holdings, Inc.(1)                                 Delaware
Envirotest Acquisition Co.(1)                                Delaware
408874 B.C. Ltd.(1)                                          British Columbia
Envirotest Illinois, Inc.(1)                                 Delaware
</TABLE>
 
                         ENVIROTEST TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
 
None
---------------
 
(1) Wholly owned
 
(2) Wholly owned by Envirotest Systems Corp. through its subsidiaries
 
(3) Wholly owned by Envirotest Systems Corp. and Envirotest Technologies, Inc.
 
(4) Wholly owned by Envirotest Systems Corp. and 408874 B.C. Ltd.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-5272

HoMedics USA LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-5040

Goodman Manufacturing Company, L.P.: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel