alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-5185

Bergstrom, Inc: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5529

Tianhai Electric North America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
#### Lillian Lonstein, Respondent, v VNV Associates, L.P., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Kristin Booth Glen, J.), entered March 6, 1990, which denied the motion by defendants VNV Associates, L.P. and JSM Management Corp. for a change of venue, pursuant to CPLR 510 (3), unanimously affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

Plaintiff, a Queens County resident, commenced a negligence action arising from her slip and fall on the steps of a Queens County commercial establishment owned by VNV Associates, L.P. Venue was properly placed in New York County on the basis of VNV Associates, L.P.’s principal place of business, which was located in Manhattan.

Defendants, who moved for a change of venue to Queens County pursuant to CPLR 510 (3), have the burden of establishing that the convenience of witnesses and the ends of justice will be promoted by a change of venue. *(See, Stavredes v United Skates,*87 AD2d 502.) A review of defendants’ moving papers reveals that they have failed to meet that burden. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Rosenberger, Kassal and Smith, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1


SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal Procedures) of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.


The undersigned, who is the President of Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT I, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies to his knowledge:


The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company (the “Report”), which accompanies this Certificate, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 10th day of August, 2016.





/s/ THOMAS P. KENNEDY


Thomas P. Kennedy


President








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6944

Omron Management Center of America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-23-00242-CV

101 LEXINGTON TOWER, LLC and Lex Avenue Hotel, LLC,

Appellants

v.

830 N. ST. MARY’S HOTEL, LTD. and Phoenix Hospitality Riverwalk, LLC,

Appellees

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2022CI09922

Honorable Mary Lou Alvarez, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ, JUSTICE RIOS, AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s March 28, 2023 

amended temporary injunction order is AFFIRMED. Costs of court for this appeal are taxed 

against 101 Lexington Tower, LLC and Lex Avenue Hotel, LLC. 

SIGNED August 2, 2023.

_____________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5075

Scosche Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
**EXHIBIT 31.01**

**Rule13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications**

I,Benjamin C. Weston, Chief Executive Officer and President of Merrill LynchAlternative Investments LLC, the manager of ML Cornerstone FuturesAccess LLC,certify that:

1. I have reviewed thisreport on Form 10-Q of ML Cornerstone FuturesAccess LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)  Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared; and

b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

c)  Disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

a)  All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

b) Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: | May 15, 2007 |   |
|-------|--------------|--------|

 
| By                                     | /s/ BENJAMIN C.  WESTON |   |
|----------------------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
| Benjamin C.  Weston                    |
| Chief Executive  Officer and President |
| (Principal  Executive Officer)         |

 

1

----
NO. 07-07 -016 1-CR IN THE CO URT OF APPEA LS FO R THE S EVEN TH D ISTRI CT O F TEXAS

AT AM AR ILLO PAN EL D AU GU ST 17, 2007

_________

_________

_________

___ GERALD LESL IE C OOTS, Appel lan t

v. THE S TATE OF TEXAS, Appel lee

_________

_________

_________

______ FRO M T HE 64 th DIS T RI CT COU RT OF HA L E CO UNT Y; NO. A14 249 -011 1; HON. ROBERT W . KINKAI D, JR., PRESIDING

_________

_________

_________

____ ON M OT ION T O DISM ISS

_________

_________

_________

_______ Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRT LE, JJ. Appell a n t G erald Les li e C oots , by and throug h hi s a ttor ney , hasfil ed a moti on to dis mis s h is appeal bec ause he no lon g er desi re s to prosec ute i t. W it hout pass ing on t he meri ts of the c ase, we g ra nt t he moti on to di smi ss pursuantto Tex as Ru le o f Appel lat e Proced ure 42 .2(a) an d dismiss the app eal. Having dismissed the ap pea l at app ellant ’s
re q uest , no moti on for re hear ing w il l be enter tai ned, and our

mandate w il l is sue forthw it h.

Br ian Qui nn Chief Justice Do not p ubl is h.
----

----

| 1.   | Such      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A2 for the period ended March 31, 2005,      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A2 for the      period ended March 31, 2005, fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Universal      Fog Inc. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:  /s/ TomBontems       Tom      Bontems       Chief      Executive Officer Dated:   July      7, 2008 |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6819

United Scope LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_05.09.19.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of JayHawk Energy, Inc. a Nevada corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Scott Mahoney, Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |     |                                                                                                                      
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                      
| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



| |     |                                                                                                                                                    
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                    
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to JayHawk Energy, Inc., and will be retained by JayHawk Energy, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                                                                                              |  |  |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | 
|                                                                                              |  |  |  | 
|/s/ Scott Mahoney                                                                             |  |  |  | 
|Scott Mahoney
Interim Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
December 23, 2016 |  |  |  |
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0079

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

BETHANY LYNN LEX,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including May 10, 2024 within which to prepare, file, and 

serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 4 2024

03/04/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0079
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6664

Lubrication Specialties, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
#### In the Matter of S.B.A., A Minor Child. C.C., Petitioner-Respondent, v. H.C., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 18343.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two.

March 10, 1993.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 29, 1993.

*357No appearance for petitioner-respondent.

James R. Spradling, Carthage, for defendant-appellant.

PREWITT, Judge.

Respondent, the maternal grandmother of a two-year-old male child filed a petition seeking to terminate the parental rights of appellant, the mother of the child, and to adopt the child. Appellant was served with a summons and the petition on April 21, 1992. She did not respond within the time allotted and the court entered an order on June 9, 1992, purporting to terminate her parental rights and placing the child in the custody of respondent “for purposes of adoption.”

On July 23, 1992, appellant filed a “motion to set aside default judgment”, reciting in the motion that it was filed “in accordance with Rule 74.05(c)”. Following a hearing, at which appellant was the only witness, the motion was denied. Appellant appealed.

Even though not raised by the parties, this court is obligated to notice matters preventing this court from obtaining jurisdiction. *In re N.B.,*710 S.W.2d 394 (Mo.App.1986); *Marsch v.*Williams, 575 S.W.2d 897, 898 (Mo.App.1978).

The record does not contain a decree of adoption, nor indicate such a decree was entered. There is no judgment from which an appeal lies in an adoption case until the court enters a decree of adoption. *N.B.,*710 S.W.2d 394; *In re D_ R_ E.,*696 S.W.2d 882, 883 (Mo.App.1985); *Marsch,*575 S.W.2d at 898.

Generally, no appeal lies until the trial court disposes of all issues between the parties. Rule 74.01(b); *Plummer v. United Sav. & Loan Ass’n,*781 S.W.2d 827, 828 (Mo.App.1989). There is, of course, an exception to that rule where the trial court makes “an express determination that there is no just reason for delay.” Rule 74.01(b). Whether that might have allowed an appeal, it is not necessary to decide as no such finding was made.

The appeal is dismissed.

MONTGOMERY, P.J., and GARRISON, J., concur.
Exhibit A
Contains BCI, see BC version.