alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
INPUT

.05

80
Consistent with USTR's Section 301 notice, OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. requests

confidential treatment for the information designated as business confidential in this submission. Such

information consists of information that would not customarily be released to the public, including

business or trade secrets regarding production costs and processes, data on sales, product characteristics

customers, destinations, and other product, sales, and cost-related business secrets. Business confidential

information has been indicated herein by enclosing it in single brackets (“[ ]”). A public version of these

comments is also being filed with all confidential information removed.

OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. submits this exclusion request on behalf of our business

unit. OMRON in the US is the only designer of this product and only supplier of this component.

KNOB,RECLINE is a plastic switch knob actuator and is used only automotive purposes of a power seat

switch which moves a passenger seat, of which is an OEM-specified dimension. It is only used for

further assembly of components which go into domestic automobile production, which is specified by

auto manufacturer.

This product is not a target of the US Administration's 301 investigation regarding Intellectual Property

concerns. This is not a concern to IP transfer and impressment. This product contains no IP of interest

related to autonomous vehicle production.

This product is not a target of the US Administration's 301 investigation regarding Intellectual Property

concerns. This is not a concern to IP transfer and impressment. This product contains no IP of interest

related to autonomous vehicle production.

The tariff action ultimately poses a risk of significant damage to OMRON, the domestic automobile

industry, and ultimately the US consumer as a increase in price. Like in the case of similar approvals for

vehicle components at the HTS level, OMRON views this product in the same manner. Immediate

movement of production to a US manufacturer or another country would pose significant re-tooling

costs, significant amounts of time, and approvals pertaining to consumer automobile safety standards are

costly and would take a significant amount of time to obtain.

OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. believes that CBP can easily exclude the KNOB,BENCH

in question based solely on the product description. The following are draft CBP exclusion instructions:

"KNOB,RECLINE for POWER SEAT SWITCH; pear-shaped molding with two trapezoidal hollow

connectors and a cylindrical light bulb holder at one end for Plastic Recline knob; Made of plastic resin - ABS with paint (gideon) ; dimensions 45.00mm X 20.00mm X 12.00mm."

This information will be contained on the invoice from the supplier.
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Alamo Group Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ronald A. Robinson,President & Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

-  The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
-  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

| March 14, 2011 | /s/Ronald A. Robinson                                                 |   |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|           | Ronald A.  Robinson

President  & Chief Executive Officer

  |   |
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


         In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of Universal
Capital Management, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending
January 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph T. Drennan, Treasurer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Joseph T. Drennan
---------------------
Joseph T. Drennan
Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)
June 30, 2005



         The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and shall
not be deemed filed by the Company for the purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") or otherwise subject to
liability under that Section. This certification shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or
the Exchange Act except to the extent that this certification is expressly
incorporated by reference into any such filing.

         A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

                                       18
<PAGE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5074

A.W. Chesterton Company:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

In the Interest of P.H. and K.H., Children

No. 06

- 21

- 00060

- CV Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 of Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct

. No. 2018

- 1997

- CCL2 ). Memorandum Opinio n delivered by Justice Stevens

, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Burgess participating

.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court
below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
We note that the app ellant has ad equately indicated h er inability to pay costs of appeal.
Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED DEC EMBER 1 , 2021 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autr ey , Clerk
EXHIBIT 4.20

Dear Investors

Here is the final proposal, which we would like to conclude today 9/17/98:

1)   Redeem $ 833,000 of the  Preferred  at 120%  (payment via wire on or before
     9/24).
2)   All additional  discount/percentages  are capped at today's discount of 20%
     plus 6% of the 80%
3)   Revise coupon dividend from 4% to 8% on unconverted amount.
4)   No more  conversions  in Sept.  Convert 1/3 after October 15,  November 15,
     December 15 (limited to available shares until registered)
5)   5% warrant coverage for the first 30 days (through October 15) exercisable 
     at $2.40  (9/16  closing  bid at $2.25) 110% of the prior 5 day closing bid
     price of the date of this agreement.
6)   5% warrant  coverage for the next two 30 day periods (Nov 15 and Dec 15) on
     the amount that is not converted at end of each period.  Exercise  Price of
     warrant  will be 110% of the prior 5 day closing bid price for Nov 15, 1998
     and December 15, 1998, respectively.
7)   USWD  to  file  the  remaining  shares   (including   warrant  shares)  for
     registration by October 31,1998,  with penalties similar to current deal if
     late on effectiveness.
8)   No restrictions if stock price > $4.50
9)   USWD raises an aggregate of $2 million by 10/30/98 or the restrictions are 
     lifted.
10)  Upon effectiveness of the next SB2, all restrictions are lifted.

Investor agrees to the following:

a.   USWD has the  right  to  register  other  shares  on the next  registration
     statement including the shares outlined above.
b.   Investor agrees upon receipt of this and any future  redemption  notice, no
     conversions  will be honored  thereafter on such  redeemed  notice and USWD
     agrees to provide cash within 5 business days.
c.   Allow for elimination of pro-rata distribution if certain investors pass on
     redemption.  In this  case,  the  redemption  amount  will  be  distributed
     pro-rata on the participating investors.

Accepted by:      _________________________________

Please email response to "mannion1@aol.com" and "bob_r@uswdata.com"
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

Pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Robert P.Akins, Chief Executive Officer of Cymer, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the“Registrant”), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

1.               The Registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934.

 

2.               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents in all material respects the results of operations of theRegistrant for the periods covered by the Report and the Registrant’s financialcondition as of the end of those periods.

 
| Date: March 11, 2004 | /s/ Robert P. Akins                      |   |
|----------------------|------------------------------------------|--------|
|                 | Robert P. Akins, Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cymer,Inc. and will be retained by Cymer, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 74 (Tuesday, April 18, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 19416]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9559]



[[Page 19416]]

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

[TA-W-30,638]


MPI Warehouse Specialty Company Williston, North Dakota; 
Dismissal of Application for Reconsideration

    Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18 an application for administrative 
reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance for workers at MPI Warehouse Specialty Co., 
Williston, North Dakota. The review indicated that the application 
contained no new substantial information which would bear importantly 
on the Department's determination. Therefore, dismissal of the 
application was issued.

TA-W-30,638; MPI Warehouse Specialty Company Williston, North Dakota 
(April 3, 1995)

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 4th day of April, 1995.
Victor J. Trunzo,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 95-9559 Filed 4-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7557

SGRE, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6667

Lubrication Specialties, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
#### Deborah J. CARTER, Employee/Respondent, v. TRANS WORLD AIRLINES, INC., Employer/Appellant.

No. WD 50662.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Dec. 12, 1995.

William F. Ringer, Kansas City, for appellant.

Daniel Robert Brown, Kansas City, for respondent.

Before LAURA DENVIR STITH, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and HANNA, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

TWA appeals an award of permanent and total disability to the employee. Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7120

Global Trade Works, LLC:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Exhibit
      99.12





INDEPENDENT
      AUDITOR’S REPORT








To
      the
      Partners


ACP
      Housing Associates, L.P.





We
      have
      audited the accompanying balance sheet of ACP Housing Associates, L.P. as of
      December 31, 2004, and the related statements of operations, changes in
      partners' equity, and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial
      statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our
      responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based
      on
      our audit.





We
      conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards of the Public
      Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require
      that
      we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
      the
      financial statements are free of material misstatement. The partnership has
      determined that it is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform,
      an
      audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included
      consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for
      designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not
      for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the
      partnership's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express
      no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
      supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
      also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
      made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
      presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
      opinion.





In
      our
      opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
      material respects, the financial position of ACP Housing Associates, L.P. as
      of
      December 31, 2004, and the results of its operations, changes in its partners
      equity and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting
      principles generally accepted in the United States of America.





Our
      audit
      was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements
      taken as a whole. The accompanying schedule of operating expenses for the year
      ended December 31, 2004, is presented for purposes of additional analysis and
      is
      not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has
      been
      subjected to the procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial
      statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in
      relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.





/s/
      Koch
      Group & Company, LLP


New
      York,
      New York


January
      20, 2005
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-7312

Nissan North America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6917

Omron Management Center of America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel