alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Melvin Joseph SCHULTE, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Cynthia Lynn SCHULTE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 65360.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

Feb. 14, 1995.

Lee R. Elliott, Troy, for appellant.

Robert M. Wohler, O’Fallon, for respondent.

KAROHL, Judge.

Wife appeals property disposition provisions in decree of dissolution of marriage. Specifically, she argues errors in disposition of husband’s retirement and pension plans. The court did not dispose of all property in the decree. We reverse and remand for that purpose.

The parties married July 17,1991, separated November 4, 1992, and divorced November 16, 1993. During their marriage, husband worked for M.E.M.C. Electronic Materials, Inc. He participated in both its pension and retirement savings plans. Husband’s financial statement indicated the value of his retirement fund was $1465. He testified his employer contributed sixty cents on the dollar to this plan. Wife’s effort to have husband speculate in terms of dollars as to how much the plan was worth was timely objected to and sustained by the court. The decree referred only to a retirement savings plan and not to the pension plan. The paragraph in the decree at issue reads as follows:

> 4. It is agreed between the parties that both Petitioner and Respondent waive any and all marital interest which they may have in any checking and savings accounts. Petitioner shall receive his non-marital IRA and shall pay to Respondent $-as for her interest in the MEMO Electronic Materials, Inc. Retirement Savings Plan.

On appeal, wife presents one point: The trial court erred in leaving a blank in the decree of dissolution, paragraph 4, representing the court’s award to wife of a portion of husband’s marital retirement savings plan, because it is ambiguous as to whether that property had been awarded and, if so, in what manner.

The trial court has a duty to set aside to each spouse non-marital property and divide all marital property. Section 452.330 RSMo 1986. The trial court cannot abdicate its jurisdiction to decide parties’ property rights. *Meltzer v. Meltzer,*775 S.W.2d 120, 121 (Mo. banc 1989).

Here, the court failed to clearly and definitely dispose of both the pension and retirement plans. It is indecisive as to whether the retirement plan is marital or *394non-marital, although it suggests that it is marital. The decree fails to designate who gets what interest in the retirement savings plan, or plans; the value of the plans; and wife’s interest, if any. It appears there was evidence of (1) a non-marital IRA belonging to husband, (2) a pension plan, and (3) a retirement savings plan. At best, the judgment is incomplete for failing to distribute these holdings in violation of § 452.330 RSMo 1986. The court has a statutory, mandatory duty to designate the property as marital or non-marital and divide. We reverse and remand for that limited purpose.

Husband’s motion for sanctions denied.

We reverse and remand.

AHRENS, P.J., and SIMON, J., concur.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6617

Aquaculture Technologies, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3289

CW Bearing USA, Inc:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6282

CW Bearing USA, Inc:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5352 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5352

 To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize the President to 
   grant a certain retired grade to the Director of Admissions of a 
                            Service Academy.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 8, 2023

  Mr. Bacon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize the President to 
   grant a certain retired grade to the Director of Admissions of a 
                            Service Academy.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Military Service Academy Director of 
Admissions Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. RETIRED GRADE FOR THE DIRECTOR OF ADMISSIONS OF A SERVICE 
              ACADEMY.

    (a) United States Military Academy.--Section 7342 of title 10, 
United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``, or the Director of Admissions,'' 
        before ``of the United States Military Academy''; and
            (2) by striking ``as such a professor'' and inserting ``in 
        such position''.
    (b) United States Naval Academy.--Section 8470a(a) of title 10, 
United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2), by inserting ``and subject to 
        paragraph (3),'' after ``subsection (b),''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(3) Upon retirement, an officer of the Navy or Marine Corps 
serving as a permanent professor, or the Director of Admissions, of the 
United States Naval Academy in the grade of captain or colonel, and 
whose service in such position has been long and distinguished, may, in 
the discretion of the President, be retired in the grade of rear 
admiral (lower half) or brigadier general.''.
    (c) United States Air Force Academy.--Section 9342 of title 10, 
United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``, or the Director of Admissions,'' 
        before ``of the United States Air Force Academy''; and
            (2) by striking ``as such a professor'' and inserting ``in 
        such position''.
                                 <all>
```
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2247

General Tools:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6086

Kyungshin Lear Sales and Engineering LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

“Made in China 2025” or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 3.4


                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                 TO THE BY-LAWS

                                       OF

                                 CONCEPTUS, INC.

     The undersigned, being the duly acting and appointed Secretary of
Conceptus, Inc., a Delaware corporation, hereby certifies that the Board of
Directors of this corporation amended the first sentence of Article III, Section
3.2 of the By-laws of this corporation to read as follows, effective as of the
date set forth below:

     "The number of directors of this corporation shall be seven (7) until
changed by a proper amendment to this Section 3.2."



Dated:  December 14, 2001                    /s/ Michael W. Hall
                                         -------------------------------
                                         Michael W. Hall, Secretary
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-5305

United Scope LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 65 (Wednesday, April 5, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 17288-17289]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8217]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

40 CFR Part 52

[MA-31-01-6845b; A-1-FRL-5177-2]


Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
Massachusetts; U Restricted Emission Status

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve a State Implementation Plan (SIP) 
revision submitted by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. This revision 
approves 310 CMR 7.02(12), entitled ``U Restricted Emission Status,'' 
into the Massachusetts SIP. EPA is also proposing to extend the federal 
enforceability of this regulation to hazardous air pollutants. In the 
Final Rules Section of this Federal Register, EPA is approving the 
Commonwealth's SIP revision as a direct final rule without prior 
proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial revision 
amendment and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for 
the approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If no adverse 
comments are received in response to that direct final rule, no further 
activity is contemplated in relation to this proposed rule. If EPA 
receives adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and 
all public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final 
rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second 
comment period on this proposal. Any parties interested in commenting 
on this proposal should do so at this time.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 5, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to Linda M. Murphy, Director, Air, 
[[Page 17289]] Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency, Region I, JFK Federal Bldg., Boston, 
MA 02203. Copies of the State submittal and EPA's technical support 
document are available for public inspection during normal business 
hours, by appointment at the Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management 
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region I, One Congress 
Street, 10th floor, Boston, MA and the Division of Air Quality Control, 
Department of Environmental Protection, One Winter Street, 8th Floor, 
Boston, MA 02108.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ida E. Walker, for criteria pollutants 
(617) 565-9168 or Janet Beloin, for HAPS (617) 565-2734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For additional information, see the direct 
final rule which is located in the rules section of this Federal 
Register.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.

    Dated: March 3, 1995.
John P. DeVillars,
Regional Administrator, Region I.
[FR Doc. 95-8217 Filed 4-4-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 65 (Wednesday, April 5, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 17313]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8321]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Eastern Washington Cascades Provincial Interagency Executive 
Committee (PIEC), Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Eastern Washington Cascades PIEC Advisory Committee will 
meet on April 25, 1995 in the Campbell's Conference Center, 104 W. 
Wooden, Chelan, Washington. The meeting will begin at 9:00 a.m. and 
continue until 4:00 p.m. Agenda items to be covered include: (1) The 
President's Forest Plan and background leading up to the advisory 
committee; (2) introduction of members and orientation; (3) operating 
guidelines and ground rules; (4) charter and purpose of the Province 
Advisory Committee; (5) relationship between the Advisory Committee and 
the PIEC; (6) brief presentation by Advisory Committee members on the 
reason for their interest in committee membership; and (7) Open public 
forum. All Eastern Washington Cascades Province Advisory Committee 
meetings are open to the public. Interested citizens are welcome to 
attain.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Direct questions regarding this meeting to Paul Hart, Designated 
Federal Official, USDA, Wenatchee National Forest, P.O. Box 811, 
Wenatchee, Washington 98807, 509-662-4335.

    Dated: March 30, 1995.
Sonny J. O'Neal,
Forest Supervisor, Wenatchee National Forest.
[FR Doc. 95-8321 Filed 4-4-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 69 (Tuesday, April 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 18399]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8787]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket Nos. RP95-208-000]


Kansas and Oklahoma Cities; Notice of Informal Technical 
Conference

April 5, 1995.
    On March 15, 1995, the Kansas and Oklahoma Cities filed an 
Emergency Complaint and Request for a Declaratory Order relating to 
Williams Natural Gas Company's proposed Third Right of First Refusal 
Procedure. Given the short time to act on that filing, an informal 
technical conference in this matter is scheduled for 1:00 p.m. Tuesday, 
April 11, 1995, at 810 First Street, NE., Washington, DC, in a room to 
be designated at that time. By notice dated March 22, 1995, comments 
and protests in this proceeding were to be filed April 12, 1995. In 
light of the technical conference, the comment period is shortened one 
day to April 11, 1995. Any interested parties attending the technical 
conference are requested to bring their comments with them. Questions 
about the conference should be directed to John M. Robinson, (202) 208-
0808, or Ken Niehaus, (202) 208-0398.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-8787 Filed 4-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 26, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6419

C&U Americas, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel