alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1
 RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of FedFirst Financial Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: August 10, 2007
    /s/ John G. RobinsonJohn G. RobinsonPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 99.1

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors

Killbuck Bancshares, Inc.

We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated
balance sheet of Killbuck Bancshares, Inc., and its consolidated subsidiary as of June 30, 2007, and the related consolidated statements of income for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, and the consolidated
statement of changes in shareholders equity for the six-month period ended June 30, 2007 and the consolidated statement of cash flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006. These consolidated financial statements are
the responsibility of the Companys management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope
than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express
such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying financial statements for them
to be in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented
herein); and in our report dated February 20, 2007 we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ S.R. SNODGRASS, A.C.                              
|S.R. Snodgrass, A.C. Steubenville, Ohio August 8, 2007
#### Helmut F. STEIN and Dorthea Stein, Appellants, v. Stephen L. TRAMPE, et al., Respondents.

No. 65967.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

May 2, 1995.

Warren W. Friedman, Garry McCubbin, St. Louis, for appellants.

Stephen C. Murphy, St. Louis, for respondents.

AHRENS, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiffs, Helmut and Dorthea Stein, appeal from an order which granted defendants’ motion to enforce settlement. Defendants include Stephen Trampe, Floyd and Martha Sweeney, and Stephen and Patricia Notestine. Appeal dismissed.

In 1984, plaintiffs entered into an agreement to sell an apartment building to defendants. Defendants assumed the mortgage and they executed a promissory note to plaintiffs, secured by a second deed of trust on the property. In 1992, plaintiffs brought an action against defendants for default on the note. Defendants counterclaimed alleging misrepresentation in the sale. On the day of trial, September 1,1993, the attorneys for the parties discussed the possibility of settlement of the case. No written settlement or memorandum was drawn up or signed. The cause was passed for settlement. Later, defendants filed a motion to enforce settlement, with a Release and Settlement Agreement attached which, according to defendants, reflected the terms of the settlement. At the hearing on the matter, plaintiffs contended that the settlement offer of September 1 was merely an offer which was not accepted. They believed that acceptance of the offer was conditional upon finding the condition of the property acceptable after inspection by plaintiffs. They further contended at the hearing that they never approved the condition of the building so that the settlement never took effect. They stated that they never signed a settlement agreement.

The trial court found that the case had been settled on September 1, subject to plaintiffs right to approve the property. The court did not find Mr. Stein’s testimony *210credible that the property was unsatisfactory. In its order, the court granted defendants’ motion to enforce settlement.

Before addressing the issues on appeal, this court has a duty to determine sua sponte its jurisdiction. *Shanklin v. Grey Eagle Distrib., Inc.,*864 S.W.2d 422, 423 (Mo.App.1993). The right to appeal is statutory, and appeal may be taken only from a final judgment. Section 512.020 RSMo 1994. Until there is a final judgment, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider the merits. The order granting defendants’ motion to enforce the settlement only is interlocutory. *Gaunter v. Shelton,*860 S.W.2d 843, 844 (Mo.App.1993).

Jurisdiction for appeal does not lie where unresolved issues remain before the trial court. *Id.*The petition has not been dismissed. The court has not entered a judgment on the settlement, and no order has been made the subject of a sanction.

Plaintiffs’ appeal is dismissed.

SIMON and KAROHL, JJ., concur.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5522

Tianhai Electric North America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6247

Yanfeng US Automotive Interior Systems I LLC:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**Consent of BDO Seidman, LLP**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

MULTIMEDIA GAMES, INC. 

AUSTIN, TEXAS 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-23123, 333-51072, 333-100611, 333-100612and 333-114345) and Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-16729, 333-28367, 333-36319, 333-64128 and 333-85382) of Multimedia Games, Inc. of our reports dated December 11, 2006, relating to the consolidated financial statements, financial statement schedule,and the effectiveness of Multimedia Games, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this Form 10-K. 

 

BDO Seidman, LLP 

Houston, Texas 

December 11, 2006
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

TYVAL ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY, LLC , Appellant,

v.

AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION , Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 1886

[ October 28, 2021 ]

Appeal from the State of Florida, Agency for Health Care Administration ; L.T. Case No s

. 2019014536, 2019014994, 19

- 5096, 19

- 6305, 2019014537, 20

- 0014 and 2019002790

.
John E. Terrel of Law Office of John E. Terrel, P.A., Tallahassee, for appellant.

Nicholas A. Merlin and Tracy Cooper George, Tallaha ssee, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

C ONNER , C.J., M AY and D AMOORGIAN , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Jayhawk Energy, Inc. a Colorado
      corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007,
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Report"), Lindsay Gorrill, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies
      to
      the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                  Company.


A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Jayhawk Energy, Inc., and will be retained by Jayhawk Energy, Inc. and furnished
      to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.










/s/
      Lindsay E. Gorrill


Lindsay
      Gorrill


Chief
      Executive Officer


August
      13, 2007
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-6351

Diebold Nixdorf Incorporated: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6535

ZANINI USA, Inc:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5034 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5034

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 4, 2024

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 2119 Market Square in Christiansted, St. Croix, United States Virgin 
 Islands, as the ``Lieutenant General Samuel E. Ebbesen Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIEUTENANT GENERAL SAMUEL E. EBBESEN POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2119 Market Square in Christiansted, St. Croix, United 
States Virgin Islands, shall be known and designated as the 
``Lieutenant General Samuel E. Ebbesen Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lieutenant 
General Samuel E. Ebbesen Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 3, 2024.

            Attest:

                                             KEVIN F. MCCUMBER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the Annual Report of GeoGlobal Resources Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul B. Miller, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

















/s/ Paul B. Miller


---------------------------


Paul B. Miller


President and Chief Executive Officer


March 31, 2011
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 68 (Monday, April 10, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 18171]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8923]



[[Page 18171]]

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Notice of Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 9:30 a.m., Thursday, April 13, 1995.

PLACE: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, 
VA 22314-3428.

STATUS: Open.

BOARD BRIEFING:

    1. Insurance Fund Report.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

    1. Approval of Minutes of Previous Open Meeting.
    2. Request from State of Michigan for Exemption under Section 
701.21(h), NCUA's Rules and Regulations, Member Business Loans.
    3. Proposed Rule: Amendments to Section 701.21(c)(8), NCUA's 
Rules and Regulations, Prohibited Fees.
    4. Proposed Rule: Amendments to Part 704, NCUA's Rules and 
Regulations, Corporate Credit Unions.
    5. Request from Midflorida Schools Federal Credit Union for a 
Field of Membership Expansion.

RECESS: 10:45 a.m.

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Thursday, April 13, 1995.

PLACE: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 4047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, 
VA 22314-3428.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

    1. Approval of Minutes of Previous Closed Meeting.
    2. Administrative Action under Section 205 of the Federal Credit 
Union Act. Closed pursuant to exemption (8).
    3. Appeal under Part 709, NCUA's Rules and Regulations. Closed 
pursuant to exemption (6).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Becky Baker, Secretary of the Board, 
Telephone (703) 518-6304.
Becky Baker,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-8923 Filed 4-6-95; 3:05 pm]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-6495

OK International, Inc: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel