alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-7270

Nissan North America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lucas Energy, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the six months ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Donald L. Sytsma, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/Donald L. SytsmaDonald L. SytsmaChief Financial OfficerNovember 16, 2009



---
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 1, 2023

No. 04-23-00831-CV

IN RE Ulises GALVAN and H&V Equipment Services, Inc.

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, we conditionally grant Relators’ 

petition for writ of mandamus. 

We direct the trial court to vacate its July 25, 2023 “Order Denying Defendants’ Motion 

for Leave to Designate a Responsible Third Party” and to grant, within fifteen days of the date of 

this order, Relators’ motion for leave to designate an unknown person as a responsible third party.

It is so ORDERED on November 1, 2023.

_____________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 1st day of November, 2023.

_____________________________

Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2021CI17977, styled Xavier Castillo v. Ulises Galvan and H&V Equipment 

Services, Inc., pending in the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Laura Salinas

presiding.
DENY and Opinion Filed October 10 , 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 22

- 00998

- CV
IN RE JOSHUA SALLEY , Relator Original Proceeding from the 470th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 470

- 55157

- 2014

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Molberg, Pedersen, III, and Garcia

Opinion by Justice Molberg Relator seeks a writ of mandamus to vacate two temporary orders that set

limi ts on where he may enroll his child in school . Entitlement to mandamus relief
requires relator to show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that he

lack s an adequate remedy by appeal. In re Prudential Ins. Co

. of Am. , 148 S.W.3d
124, 13 5

– 36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding).
After reviewing the petition and the record before us, we conclude relator ha s
not shown he is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny the petition for– 2

–

writ of mandamus. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a).

220998f.p05 /Ken Molberg/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
#### Jerome MORRIS-BEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 61564.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Nov. 10, 1992.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Dec. 23, 1992.

Application to Transfer Denied Jan. 26, 1993.

David C. Hemingway, St. Louis, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Elizabeth L. Ziegler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court did not clearly err in such denial. Therefore, we affirm the motion court’s decision pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion in this case. The parties have been provided with a *506memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our decision.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Luis Osorio, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Beal, J.), rendered on December 13, 1988, unanimously affirmed. Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this

*252appeal. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger, Asch and Kassal, JJ.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-6683

C&U Americas, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
#### David J. LOETHEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 48405.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

May 17, 1994.

Gary E. Brotherton, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Joanne E. Beal, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before HANNA, P.J., and BRECKENRIDGE and ELLIS, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from the denial of a Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evi-dentiary hearing.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
---

---

Exhibit 10.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements (Forms S-8 Nos. 333-113932, 333-132649,
333-123410, 333-08826, 333-10092, 333-12466 and 333-12988), of our report dated April 7,
2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Gilat Satellite Networks
Ltd and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Gilat Satellite
Networks Ltd., included in its Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31,
2008.

| |  | Kost Forer Gabbay and Kasierer                  A member of Ernst & Young Global
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
EXHIBIT 23.1





                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report included in Liberty Technologies, Inc.'s Form 10-K, into the Company's
previously filed Form S-8 Registration Statement (File No. 33-73070) filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 20, 1993, Form S-8
Registration Statement (File No. 33-68744) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on September 13, 1993, and Form S-8 Registration Statements
(file No. 33-67032) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August
12, 1993.


                                                           ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP



Philadelphia, Pa.,
   April 15, 1997
**EXHIBIT 32.02**

** **

**Section 1350 Certification**

** **

**Inconnection with this quarterly report of ML Aspect FuturesAccess LLC (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I,Barbra E. Kocsis, Chief Financial Officer of Merrill Lynch AlternativeInvestments LLC, the manager of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:**

 

1.This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information containedin this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: May 14, 2010 |                                          |
|-------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
|                    |                                          |   |
| By:                     | /s/ BARBRA E. KOCSIS                          |   |
|                    | Barbra E. Kocsis                              |   |
|                    | Chief Financial Officer                       |   |
|                    | (Principal Financial and  Accounting Officer) |   |

 

----
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5467 

To prohibit the sale of a firearm unless the firearm or packaging carries 

a label that provides the number of the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 14, 2023 

Ms. BROWNLEY (for herself, Mr. MOULTON, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Mr. GRIJALVA, and Ms. TLAIB) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To prohibit the sale of a firearm unless the firearm or 

packaging carries a label that provides the number of 

the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Gun Suicide Preven5 tion Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LABELING REQUIREMENT. 

7 (a) PROHIBITION.—Notwithstanding the exclusion of 

8 firearms from the definition of consumer product in sec9 tion 3(a)(5)(E) of the Consumer Product Safety Act (15 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5467 IH

1 U.S.C. 2052(a)(5)(E)), it shall be unlawful for a manufac2 turer or retailer to sell or offer for sale any firearm that 

3 does not meet the requirements of subsection (b). 

4 (b) NATIONAL SUICIDE PREVENTION HOTLINE

5 LABEL.—A firearm meets the requirements of this sub6 section if a clear and conspicuous label is attached to the 

7 firearm or appears on any packaging of the firearm and 

8 on any descriptive material included with the firearm 

9 that— 

10 (1) is written in both English and Spanish; 

11 (2) in English, reads ‘‘IF YOU OR SOMEONE 

12 YOU KNOW IS CONTEMPLATING SUICIDE, 

13 PLEASE CALL THE NATIONAL SUICIDE 

14 PREVENTION LIFELINE AT’’ followed by the 

15 toll-free phone number of the National Suicide Pre16 vention Lifeline, maintained by the Assistant Sec17 retary for Mental Health and Substance Use under 

18 section 520E–3 of the Public Health Service Act (42 

19 U.S.C. 290bb–36c), or any successor to such toll20 free number; and 

21 (3) contains a yellow triangle containing an ex22 clamation mark that appears immediately before the 

23 words ‘‘IF YOU’’ on the label. 

24 (c) ENFORCEMENT.—A violation of the prohibition in 

25 subsection (a) shall be treated as a violation of section 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 5467 IH

1 19(a) of the Consumer Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 

2 2068). Any person who violates subsection (a) shall be 

3 subject to the penalties set forth in section 20 and 21 of 

4 such Act (15 U.S.C. 2069; 2070). 

5 (d) RETAILER DEFINED.—In this section, the term 

6 ‘‘retailer’’ includes a dealer, as such term is definition in 

7 section 921(a) of title 18, United States Code. 

8 (e) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This Act shall take effect on 

9 the date that is two years after the date of enactment of 

10 this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report On

Form 10-QSB of Edmonds 5, Inc. for the quarter ending January 31, 2005, I,
Richard Neussler, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Edmonds
5, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge
and belief, that:


     1.   Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending January
          31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
          the quarter ending January 31, 2005, fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
          Edmonds 5, Inc.

Dated:  May 20, 2005

EDMONDS 5, INC.

By: /s/ Richard Neussler
-------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 99.2

                                 CERTIFICATION

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned
President and Chief Executive Officer of WCI Steel, Inc. (the "Company") hereby
certifies that the Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended
October 31, 2002, accompanying this certification, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

     Date:  March 6, 2003

                                           /S/ EDWARD R. CAINE
                                           -----------------------------------
                                           Name: Edward R. Caine
                                           Title: President and Chief Executive
                                                  Officer
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5088

A.W. Chesterton Company:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

April 12, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-7136

ECM Industries LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_04.15.19.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 13-3681

_____________

FREE SPEECH COALITION, INC.; AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MEDIA 

PHOTOGRAPHERS, INC.; THOMAS HYMES; 

TOWNSEND ENTERPRISES, INC., d/b/a SINCLAIR INSTITUTE; 

BARBARA ALPER; CAROL QUEEN; BARBARA NITKE; DAVID STEINBERG; 

MARIE L. LEVINE, a/k/a NINA HARTLEY; 

DAVE LEVINGSTON; BETTY DODSON; CARLIN ROSS,

 Appellants

v.

ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

_________________

SUR PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING

Present: SMITH, SCIRICA, and RENDELL, Circuit Judges

The petition for panel rehearing filed by appellant in the above-entitled case 

having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this Court, it is 

hereby

O R D E R E D that the petition for rehearing by the panel is GRANTED.
BY THE COURT,

s/ D. Brooks Smith 

Circuit Judge

Dated: September 1, 2015

tmm/cc: Lorraine R. Baumgardner, Esq.

J. Michael Murray, Esq.

Scott R. McIntosh, Esq.

Anne Murphy, Esq.

Andrew G. Rocker, Esq.

Fred T. Magaziner, Esq.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 12, 2021

Order 

Clerk

July 12, 2021

163258-9(69)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 163258

v COA: 347207

Macomb CC: 2017-002787-FC

JEREMIAH JAMES BOSHELL, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 163259

v COA: 347208

Macomb CC: 2017-000658-FC

JEREMIAH JAMES BOSHELL, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellant to exceed the page 

limitation for his application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The 60-page application 

submitted on July 8, 2021, is accepted for filing.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 26, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-6785

Otis Elevator Co: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September_2019.pdf. 

An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the exclusion notice. The scope of the exclusion is governed by the scope of the 10-digit HTSUS 

subheadings and product descriptions in the annex to the product exclusion notice, and not by the 

product descriptions set out in any particular request for exclusion. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel