alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Robin HARRISON, Defendant/Appellant. Robin HARRISON, Defendant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent.

Nos. 67014, 68598.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

April 30, 1996.

Robert E. Steele, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Christine M. Blegen, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before KAROHL, P.J., and GRIMM and DOWD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The jury found defendant guilty of the sale of a controlled substance, § 195.211, RSMo 1994. Pursuant to the jury’s recommendation, the trial court sentenced her to 10 years imprisonment.

On appeal, she alleges the trial court abused its discretion when it denied her motion for a new trial. Specifically, she contends the verdict was not unanimous because one juror did not agree with it.

Defendant also alleges the motion court erred in denying her Rule 29.15 motion for ineffective assistance of counsel. We disagree and affirm.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgments are affirmed pursuant to Rules 84.16(b) and 30.25(b).
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-105553, No. 333-97369, No. 333-63070, No.
333-42656, No. 333-30111 and No. 333-04186) of Conceptus, Inc. of our reports
dated March 15, 2004 relating to the consolidated financial statements and
financial statement schedule, which appear in this Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Jose, California
March 15, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 55 (Wednesday, March 22, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15166-15167]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7000]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (95-024)]


NASA Advisory Council (NAC), Aeronautics Advisory Committee, 
Subcommittee on Materials and Structures; Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public 
Law 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration announces a NAC, Aeronautics Advisory Committee, 
Subcommittee on Materials and Structures meeting.

DATES: April 11, 1995, 8 a.m. to 7 p.m.; and April 12, 1995, 8 a.m. to 
2:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Langley 
Research Center, Room 124, Building 1229, Hampton, VA 23681.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Darrel R. Tenney, National 
Aeronautics and Space Administration, Langley Research Center, Hampton, 
VA 23681 (804/864-3492).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public up to 
the seating capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting is as 
follows:

--Overview of NASA's Aeronautics Program
--Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Airframe/Engine
--Base Materials & Structures/Airframes
--Base Materials & Structures/Propulsion

    It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to 
accommodate the [[Page 15167]] scheduling priorities of the key 
participants.

    Dated: March 16, 1995.
Timothy M. Sullivan,
Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-7000 Filed 3-21-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6164

SGRE, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-3904

ECM Industries LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 67 (Friday, April 7, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 17783]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8536]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP95-287-000]


Mojave Pipeline Company; Request Under Blanket Authorization

April 3, 1995.
    Take notice that on March 28, 1995, Mojave Pipeline Company 
(Mojave), 5001 E. Commercenter Drive, Bakersfield, California 93309, 
filed in Docket No. CP95-287-000 a request pursuant to Sections 157.205 
and 157.211 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act 
(18 CFR 157.205, 157.211) to construct and operate a sale tap under 
Mojave's blanket certificate issued in Docket Nos. CP89-1-000 and CP89-
2-000 pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully 
set forth in the request that is on file with the Commission and open 
to public inspection.
    Mojave proposes to construct a sales tap and metering and 
appurtenant facilities onto its existing 42-inch line in Kern County, 
California to transport natural gas on behalf of Tehachapi-Cummings 
County Water District (Tehachapi-Cummings). Mojave states these 
facilities would be used to transport up to 3,000 MMBtu per day on 
behalf of Tehachapi-Cummings pursuant to Mojave's FT-1 and IT-1 rate 
schedules. Mojave states that the service rendered to Tehachapi-
Cummings through the proposed facilities will have no material impact 
on Mojave's peak day or annual deliveries.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefore, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-8536 Filed 4-6-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 7504

LEROY L. STATON , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. SUPERINTENDENT LEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Anderson

. Timothy M. Cain , District Judge. ( 8:19

- cv
- 01805

- TMC )

Submitted : February 20, 2020 Decided: February 25, 2020

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, RUSHING , Circuit Judge , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Leroy Staton, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Leroy Staton seeks to appeal the district c ourt’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Staton ’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2018) petition as an unauthorized, successive § 2254 petition

. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate o f appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (201 8 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (201 8 ). When , as here, the district court
denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing S lack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Staton has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argumen t would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 65 (Wednesday, April 5, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 17371]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8329]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-29,743]


IBM Corporation, Poughkeepsie, New York; Notice of Revised 
Determination on Reconsideration

    On October 3, 1994, the Department issued an Affirmative 
Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration for the former 
workers of the subject firm. The notice was published in the Federal 
Register on October 14, 1994 (59 FR 52193).
    The Department expanded its investigation to include the entire 
Large Scale Computing Division (LSCD) at Poughkeepsie, New York where 
mainframe computers are produced.
    Investigation findings show that sales of computer hardware 
declined in FY 1993 compared to FY 1992 and in the year to date 3rd 
quarter of 1994 compared to the same period in 1993. The findings on 
reconsideration show substantial worker separations in 1993 and in 
1994.
    Other findings on reconsideration show that IBM lost market share 
of mainframe processors and processor subassemblies and components in 
1994.
    U.S. imports of automatic data processing equipment and parts 
increased in the latest 12 month period ending in February 1994 
compared to the same period in 1993.
    Other IBM certifications are for workers at Rochester, Minnesota 
(TA-W-29,026) computer storage equipment; (TA-W-30,176) computers; at 
Endicott, New York (TA-W-30,258) mainframe computer hardware and 
software and (TA-W-30,397) printed circuit boards and at Hopewell 
Junction, New York (TA-W-29,752) computer chips.

Conclusion

    After careful consideration of the new facts obtained on 
reconsideration, it is concluded that workers at IBM Poughkeepsie, New 
York were adversely affected by increased imports of articles that are 
like or directly competitive with the LSCD mainframes produced at 
Poughkeepsie, New York. In accordance with the provisions of the Act, I 
make the following revised determination for workers of IBM 
Corporation, Poughkeepsie, New York.

    All workers of IBM Corporation in Poughkeepsie, New York who 
became totally or partially separated from employment on or after 
March 31, 1993 are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under 
Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, D.C., this 23rd day of March, 1995.
Victor J. Trunzo,
Program Manger, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 95-8329 Filed 4-4-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of

JONATHAN EDWARD OLIVETTI :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 2834 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

No. 146 DB 2021

(United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania

, Crim.

No. 3:21

- cr

- 00087)

Attorney Registration No. 206603

(Lackawanna County)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 7 th day of Dec ember , 2021

, having indicated that he has no

objection to being placed on temporary suspension , the Rule is made absolute, and

Jonathan Edward Olivetti is temporarily suspended

. See Pa.R.D.E. 214(d)(2). He shall

comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217.

Respondent’s right to petition for dissolution or amendment of this Order and to

request accelerated disposition of any charges underlying this Order pursuant to

Pa.R.D.E. 214(d)(4) and (f)(2) are specifically preserved.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of iVoice Technology, Inc. ("the
Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"),
I, Jerome Mahoney, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
          the Company.



Date: February 7, 2007                    By /s/ Jerome Mahoney
                                          ---------------------
                                          Jerome Mahoney
                                          President, Chief Executive Officer and
                                          Principal Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sonoma College, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David
H. Weaver, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ David H. Weaver
---------------------
David H. Weaver
Chief Financial Officer
November 20, 2006
10.2

0

0

6.65

11.3

3.4

6.8

10.213.6

3.46.8

13.6

2- 6.3 ±0.2

0

0

18- 1.3 

+0.1

0

2- 3.2 ±0.1

35.7 ±0.2

31.1 ±0.2

5.7 ±0.2

10.7 ±0.2

3.46.810.213.63.46.810.213.6

6.65

11.3

10.2

0

0

31.4 ±0.3

3.65

7.65

3.4

6.810.213.63.46.813.6

(0.64×0.86)

NOTE2

C

(060 SHORT TERMINAL-1/2)

D

M D

NOTE3 NOTE4

C 0.4

2- 6 ±0.1

2- 2.4 ±0.2

29.4 ±0.2

35.4

20.3

14

±0.3

7.9

±0.3

31.92

9.9

21.6 

0.

1

5

7.45

4.4

±0.3

3.2 ±0.6 2

(060 TERMINAL-1)

SECTION A-A

SCALE (2:1)

(060 TERMINAL-2)

1

3

9.9

0.8

18.6 ±0.2

6.6 

±0.3

±0.3

13.8

1.3

6.2 

1.95

1.5

0.8

版数

VER.

年月日

D A T E

CN NO.         変 更 内 容

        DESCRIPTION

製 図

DR.

担 当

CHK.

査 閲

APPD.

承 認

APPD.

符号

NO.

名   称

DESCRIPTION

個 数

QTY.

材  料

MATERIAL

仕 上

FINISH

備  考

REMARKS

3 060 SHORT TERMINAL-2 9 COPPER ALLOY TIN PLATING -

2 060 SHORT TERMINAL-1 9 COPPER ALLOY TIN PLATING -

1 HOUSING 1 SPS-GF30 - COLOR:GRAY

NOTE1. THE RECOMMENDED TAPPING SCREW IS SPECIFIED IN

 JIS B 1122 2ND GRADE 3×6 AND B-TIGHT SCREW 3×6.

NOTE2. MATERIAL CODE APPEARS IN RAISED LETTERS.

NOTE3. MOLDING LOT (YEAR AND MONTH) APPEARS IN RAISED LETTERS.

NOTE4. COMPANY LOGO "JAE" AND CAVITY NUMBER APPEARS IN RAISED LETTERS.

NOTE5. THE ASSEMBLY LOT NO. IS INDICATED.

NOTE6. TERMINAL NUMBER APPEARS IN RAISED LETTERS.

NOTE7. COUNTERPART CONNECTOR IS 18PIN FEMALE CONNECTOR BY YAZAKI CORPORATION,LTD.

注1. 推奨タッピンねじは、JIS B 1122 2種 3×6及びBタイトねじ 3×6。

注2. 材料名を浮き出す。

注3. ハウジングの成形ロット(年月)を浮き出す。

注4. 社標、キャビティ番号を浮き出す。

注5. 組立ロット番号を表記する。

注6. 端子番号を浮き出す。

注7. 本コネクタのかん合相手は矢崎総業株式会社殿 18極メスコネクタである。

(060

SHO

RT TER

MINAL-1/2)

6.25

1.85

JACS-11180

INDUSTRY,LTD. 

JAE Connector DIV. Proprietary.Copyright(C) 2016, Japan Aviation Electronics Industry, LTD.

DCF-C-213H(12.08)

.

.

±

±

. ±

. ±

’

±

° ±

°

0.1

0.4

0.8

図面番号(DRAWING NO.)

SIZE A2

S/W

636211JS

SJ112636 1

日本航空電子工業株式会社

CHK.

A.HOUJOU

JAHL-10940 製図

K.KAWASE

2:1 MX58

10.2g

(MALE CONNECTOR)

28/NOV/2016

2010 504030 60 70 9080 100

Y.WATANABE

―

MX58018NF1

0

仕様書(SPECIFICATION)

寸法(DIMENSION)

一般公差(GENERAL TOLERANCE)

単位(UNIT):mm

角度(ANGLES)

APPD.

承認

APPD.

担当

DR.

第1版(ORIGINAL DATE) シリーズ(SERIES)尺度(SCALE)

名称(TITLE)

質量(MASS)

(VER.)

査閲

版数

JAPAN AVIATION

ELECTRONICS

).ON GNIWARD( 号番面図

CONNECTOR CONTACT AREA

コネクタ接触面

F

TERMINAL NUMBER 10

TERMINAL NUMBER 18

E

基板厚:t1.6±0.2

THICKNESS:t1.6±0.2

ハウジング外形投影線

φ0.1

F- CL

P.C.B. LAYOUT (REFERENCE)

基板レイアウト(参考)

TERMINAL NUMBER 9

HOUSING EXTERNAL PROJECTION LINE

TERMINAL NUMBER 1

E

F

29.4 ±0.05

ISOMETRIC VIEW (1:1)

斜視図(1:1)

NOTE5

0.4

A M

NOTE6

B

B- CL

0.4

M

(060 SHORT TERMINAL-1/2)

NOTE6 A B

A

0.64 1.5 2-R1 ±0.3

0.10

0.05

9.15

32 

+

-

35.4 ±0.3

0.20

0.05

+-

12.55 +

-

0.200.05

A

A

(かん合状態)

(MATED CONDITION)

(かん合前状態)

(PREMATED CONDITION)

COUNTERPART CONNECTOR

かん合相手コネクタ

MATING CONDITION(REFERENCE)

かん合状態図(参考)

2.1

20.1

2016/11/29
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Rick Wilson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Blacksands Petroleum, Inc., for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Blacksands Petroleum, Inc.





|Date: June 16, 2008 | By:
/s/ Rick Wilson                              
|------------------- | -------------------------------------------------
|                    | Rick Wilson 
         Principal Financial Officer
|                    |                                                  







---
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION

Appellate case name: Blake Anthony Monakino v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 4

- 00 361

- CR

Trial court case number: 1397016

Trial court: 174th Judicial District Court of Harris County

On April 16 , 2015, this Court had granted appellant ’s counsel ’s “Motion to Abate Appe a l

, ” order ing the reporter to file a supplemental reporter’s record certification

, and the trial clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing th e amended certification clarifying appellant’s right of appeal . On July 9, 2015, appellant filed a “ Motion F o r Order R equiring Clerk To Comply W ith T his Court’s Previous Order April 16, 2015 ,” noting that only the reporter had timely complied with this Court’s Order , but that the

trial clerk ha d not yet fil ed the requested supplemental clerk’s record

. Accordingly, appella nt’s motion is GRANTED , and the trial court is ORDERED

to execute an amended certification clarifying appellant’s right of appeal

, and the trial

clerk is ORDERED to file a supplemental clerk’s record with that amended certification.

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d)

, 34.5 (c)(2)

. On remand, the trial court may, but does not need to, con duct another hearing or have appellant present or sign the certification. The supplemental clerk’s record containing the amended certification shall be filed

with this Court no later than 15 days from the date of this O rder

, if no hearing is held, or 15 days from the date of the hearing if one is held. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 34.5 (c)(2) , (3) . If

the trial court hold s a hearing, the court shall have a reporter record the hearing and file a supplemental reporter’s record with this Court within 30 days of the hearing. Because appellant is represented by counsel, his pro se motion for an oral argument, filed on June 30, 2015, is D ISMISSED

. See Scheanette v. State , 144 S.W.3d 503, 505 n.2 (Tex. Crim. A pp. 2004) (no entitlement to hybrid representation).

It is so ORDERED

.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes



Date: August 4, 2015