alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6563

Michel Sales Company, Inc:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_5-30-2019.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Frank Berrios, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (George Covington, J.), rendered October 29, 1985, after a jury trial, convicting defendant of robbery in the first degree, assault in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree and sentencing defendant, as a second violent felony offender, to concurrent terms of from 10 to 20 years, 3 Vi to 7 years, and one year, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant was convicted of robbing and stabbing the victim after he and an unapprehended accomplice invited the victim to share in some cocaine. The victim knew defendant slightly from the neighborhood. A witness, who was a friend of the victim and also knew defendant slightly from the neighborhood, testified that he saw the victim, the defendant and the accomplice walk towards the site of crime just before it occurred.

Defendant’s claim on appeal that it was error not to charge and define acting in concert is unpreserved (CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Ford,*66 NY2d 428, 441). The trial court did ask defendant for requests to charge and, after instructing the jury, asked him whether he had any exceptions to the charge as given. Defendant neither requested an instruction on acting in concert nor excepted to the charge as given. In any event, no reasonable view of the evidence permits an inference that defendant acted in any capacity other than as a principal.

Also unpreserved is defendant’s bolstering argument, both as to the eyewitness and the arresting officer. He did not *359object to the testimony when given, request a curative instruction, or move for a mistrial on this basis (CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Galloway,*54 NY2d 396). In any event, the eyewitness did not identify defendant as the person who robbed the victim, but only as the person he saw walking with the victim prior to the robbery; and the arresting officer did not testify that he arrested defendant after he was identified by the victim. There being no violation within the meaning of *People v Trowbridge*(305 NY 471), we decline to review in the interest of justice.

Defendant has not demonstrated on appeal that he was deprived of meaningful representation at trial *(People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137, 147; *People v Satterfield,*66 NY2d 796, 799).

We have examined defendant’s remaining contentions, to wit, that the court disparaged defense counsel and unduly restricted cross-examination, and find them to be meritless. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach and Smith, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 71 (Thursday, April 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18852-18853]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9106]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act

    In accordance with Departmental policy, 28 CFR 50.7, and 42 U.S.C. 
9622(d)(2), notice is hereby given that a proposed Consent Decree in 
United States of America v. Bayard Mining Corp., Mining Remedial 
Recovery Corp., and VIACOM International Inc., Civil Action No. 95-285-
MVLFG, was lodged on March 21, 1995 with the United States District 
Court for the District of New Mexico. Contemporaneously with the 
lodging of the consent decree, the United States filed a civil action 
under Sections 106 and 107 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (``CERCLA''), 42 
U.S.C. 9606 and 9607, for injunctive relief to abate an imminent and 
substantial endangerment to the public health and welfare or the 
environment due to the release or threatened release of hazardous 
substances from a facility, and for recovery of response costs that 
have been and will be incurred by the United States in response to 
releases or threatened releases of hazardous substances from the same 
facility, known as the Cleveland Mill Superfund site, located in Grant 
County, New Mexico. Under the proposed Consent Decree, Settling 
Defendants will conduct or finance 100% of the remedial design and 
remedial action at the Site; pay 100% of past and future costs; and pay 
for damages to natural resources at the Site.
    The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the 
proposed consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General of the Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
Department of Justice, P.O. Box 7611, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, 
D.C. 20044. Comments should refer to United States of America v. Bayard 
Mining Corp., Mining Remedial Recovery Corp., and VIACOM International 
Inc., DOJ Ref. #90-11-3-1171.
    The proposed consent decree may be examined at the office of the 
United States Attorney, 625 Silver, SW, Suite 

[[Page 18853]]
400 Albuquerque, New Mexico; the Region VI Office of the Environmental 
Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas; and at the Consent 
Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, DC 20005, 
(202) 624-0892. A copy of the proposed Consent Decree may be obtained 
in person or by mail from the Consent Decree Library.
    In requesting a copy, please enclose a check in the amount of 
$21.25 (25 cents per page reproduction cost) payable to the ``Consent 
Decree Library.''
Joel M. Gross,
Acting Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 95-9106 Filed 4-12-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5409 

To amend the Defense Production Act of 1950 to require the Committee 

on Foreign Investment in the United States to determine whether a 

national security review is needed for reportable agricultural land transactions referred by the Secretary of Agriculture, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 12, 2023 

Mr. LUETKEMEYER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committees on 

Foreign Affairs, and Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Defense Production Act of 1950 to require 

the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United 

States to determine whether a national security review 

is needed for reportable agricultural land transactions 

referred by the Secretary of Agriculture, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Safeguarding Amer5 ican Farms from Foreign Influence Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5409 IH

1 SEC. 2. CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN AGRICULTURAL 

2 LAND TRANSACTIONS. 

3 Section 721(b)(1) of the Defense Production Act of 

4 1950 (50 U.S.C. 4565(b)(1)) is amended by adding at the 

5 end the following: 

6 ‘‘(I) CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN AGRI7 CULTURAL LAND TRANSACTIONS.— 

8 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 

9 days after receiving notification from the 

10 Secretary of Agriculture of a reportable 

11 agricultural land transaction, the Com12 mittee shall determine— 

13 ‘‘(I) whether the transaction is a 

14 covered transaction; and 

15 ‘‘(II) if the Committee deter16 mines that the transaction is a cov17 ered transaction, whether the Com18 mittee should initiate a review pursu19 ant to subparagraph (D), or take an20 other action authorized under this sec21 tion, with respect to the reportable ag22 ricultural land transaction. 

23 ‘‘(ii) REPORTABLE AGRICULTURAL

24 LAND TRANSACTION.—In this subpara25 graph, the term ‘reportable agricultural 

26 land transaction’ means a transaction— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 5409 IH

1 ‘‘(I) that the Secretary of Agri2 culture has reason to believe is a cov3 ered transaction; 

4 ‘‘(II) that involves the acquisition 

5 of an interest in agricultural land by 

6 a foreign person, other than by a for7 eign person of an excepted foreign 

8 state or an excepted real estate for9 eign state, as such terms are defined 

10 in regulations prescribed by the Com11 mittee; and 

12 ‘‘(III) with respect to which a 

13 person is required to submit a report 

14 to the Secretary of Agriculture under 

15 section 2(a) of the Agricultural For16 eign Investment Disclosure Act of 

17 1978.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 73 (Monday, April 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 19309]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9371]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards; Subcommittee Meeting on 
Reactor Fuels; Notice of Meeting

    The ACRS Subcommittee on Reactor Fuels will hold a meeting on May 
3, 1995, Room T-2B3, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland.
    The entire meeting will be open to public attendance.
    The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows:
    Wednesday, May 3, 1995--8:30 a.m. until the conclusion of business.
    The Subcommittee will begin review of the NRC and industry programs 
being conducted to address issues associated with the use of high-
burnup fuel. The purpose of this meeting is to gather information, 
analyze relevant issues and facts, and to formulate proposed positions 
and actions, as appropriate, for deliberation by the full Committee.
    Oral statements may be presented by members of the public with the 
concurrence of the Subcommittee Chairman; written statements will be 
accepted and made available to the Committee. Electronic recordings 
will be permitted only during those portions of the meeting that are 
open to the public, and questions may be asked only by members of the 
Subcommittee, its consultants, and staff. Persons desiring to make oral 
statements should notify the cognizant ACRS staff engineer named below 
five days prior to the meeting, if possible, so that appropriate 
arrangements can be made.
    During the initial portion of the meeting, the Subcommittee, along 
with any of its consultants who may be present, may exchange 
preliminary views regarding matters to be considered during the balance 
of the meeting.
    The Subcommittee will then hear presentations by and hold 
discussions with representatives of the NRC staff, its consultants, and 
other interested persons regarding this review.
    Further information regarding topics to be discussed, whether the 
meeting has been cancelled or rescheduled, the Chairman's ruling on 
requests for the opportunity to present oral statements and the time 
allotted therefor can be obtained by contacting the cognizant ACRS 
staff engineer, Dr. Medhat El-Zeftawy (telephone 301/415-6889) between 
7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. (EDT). Persons planning to attend this meeting 
are urged to contact the above named individual one or two working days 
prior to the meeting to be advised of any potential changes in the 
proposed agenda, etc., that may have occurred.

    Dated: April 11, 1995.
Sam Duraiswamy,
Chief, Nuclear Reactors Branch.
[FR Doc. 95-9371 Filed 4-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M
*This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

MAR 2 1999

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

JACK DAVID COX,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 98-5123

(D.C. No. 96-CV-876-E)

(N.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, BALDOCK and HENRY, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The cause is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
-2-

Jack David Cox filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 claiming that he

was denied his Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel in his

1994 criminal trial. The district court denied the petition. Mr. Cox asks us to

grant a certificate of appealability and reverse.

After review of the record in this case and the arguments set forth by

petitioner, we are persuaded that the district court did not err in its careful and

thorough analysis of Mr. Cox’s contentions. Substantially for the reasons given

by the district court in its Order filed May 28, 1998, we are persuaded Mr. Cox

has not “made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right” as

required for the issuance of a certificate of appealability, 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). 

We therefore DENY Mr. Cox’s motion for a certificate and DISMISS the appeal.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Stephanie K. Seymour

Chief Judge
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 8 (Thursday, January 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 3006]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-732]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

PHYSICIAN PAYMENT REVIEW COMMISSION


Commission Meeting

AGENCY: Physician Payment Review Commission.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission will hold its next public meeting on Thursday, 
January 19, 1995, and Friday, January 20, 1995 at the Embassy Suites 
Hotel, 1250 22nd Street NW., Washington, DC, in the Diplomat Room. The 
meetings are tentatively scheduled to begin at 9:00 a.m. each day. 
Among the topics to be discussed are state-based insurance market 
reform, Medicare risk program payment policy, Medicare volume 
performance standards, Medicaid section 1115 waivers, integration of 
medical practice, relationships between providers and health plans, the 
impact of the changing health care market on the physician labor 
market, state responses to market reform, performance reports, 
developments and use of practice guidelines, technology and coverage 
decisions in the Medicare program, Medicare funding of nursing 
education, network development in rural areas, and telemedicine. 
Several other topics may be added to the final agenda, which will be 
available on January 13, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Please note that the Commission has a new address: 2120 L 
Street, N.W./Suite 200/Washington, DC 20037. The telephone number is 
the same: 202/653-7220.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lauren LeRoy, Deputy Director, or Annette Hennessey, Executive 
Assistant, at 202/653-7220.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Agendas for the meeting will be available on 
Friday, January 13, 1995 and will be mailed out at that time. To 
receive an agenda, please direct all requests to the receptionist at 
202/653-7220.

Paul B. Ginsburg,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 95-732 Filed 1-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-SE-M
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 69 (Tuesday, April 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 18395]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8904]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 040495B]

Western Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Western Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) will 
hold a meeting of its Bottomfish Plan Team (Team) on April 27-28, 1995, 
from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. each day. The meeting will be held in Room 
306 of the Executive Centre, 1088 Bishop Street, Honolulu, HI 96813.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kitty M. Simonds, Executive Director, 
Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council, 1164 Bishop St., 
Suite 1405, Honolulu, HI 96813; telephone 808-522-8220.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Team will discuss and may make 
recommendations to the Council on the following agenda items:
    1. 1994 annual report preparation;
    2. Management of overfished bottomfish in the Main Hawaiian 
Islands;
    3. NMFS review of revised Northwestern Hawaiian Islands catch and 
effort reporting system;
    4. Overfishing definitions; and
    5. Other business.
    This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Kitty M. Simonds, 808-522-8220 (voice) or 808-
522-8226 (fax), at least 5 days prior to the meeting date.

    Dated: April 5, 1995.
Richard W. Surdi,
Acting Director, Office of Fisheries Conservation and Management, 
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 95-8904 Filed 4-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
```
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cardinal Financial Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bernard H. Clineburg, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  This
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |  | /s/BERNARD H. CLINEBURGBernard H. Clineburg
Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2002
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 70 (Wednesday, April 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 18602]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8970]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Salvador Vicente Bonilla-Mathe; Change in Bank Control Notice

Acquisition of Shares of Banks or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificant listed below has applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on notices are set forth in 
paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notice is available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. Once the notice has been accepted for 
processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices of 
the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in 
writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for the notice or to the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than 
April 26, 1995.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Zane R. Kelley, Vice President) 
104 Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303:
    1. Salvador Vicente Bonilla-Mathe, Miami, Florida; to acquire an 
additional 1.6 percent, for a total of 25.4 percent, of the voting 
shares of Gulf Bank, Miami, Florida.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 6, 1995.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-8970 Filed 4-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           2,993
<SECURITIES>                                     3,966
<RECEIVABLES>                                      660
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      4,729
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,552
<PP&E>                                             653
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,976
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              526
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            65
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,385
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,976
<SALES>                                          2,664
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,664
<CGS>                                            2,135
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,135
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,121
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (568)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,024)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       155
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,179)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,179)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.97)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.97)
        

</TABLE>