alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit32.1**

#### **SECTION1350 CERTIFICATIONS**

This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements ofSection 1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and CriminalProcedures) of the United States Code and shall not be relied on by any personfor any other purpose.

The undersigned, who are the Chief Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial Officer of Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT I, Inc. (the “Company”),each hereby certify as follows:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company (the “Report”), whichaccompanies this Certificate, fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Dated this 15th day of May,  2007. |                                         |
|------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|
|                               |                                         |
|                               |                                         |
|                               | /s/ Robert M. Behringer                      |   |
|                               | Robert M. Behringer, Chief Executive Officer |
|                               |                                         |
|                               |                                         |
|                               |                                         |
|                               | /s/ Gary S. Bresky                           |   |
|                               | Gary S. Bresky, Chief Financial Officer      |

 

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrantand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

----
#### In the ESTATE OF Leonard W. PHILLIPS, Jr., Respondent, v. Leonard W. PHILLIPS, Sr., Appellant.

No. WD 50866.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

March 12, 1996.

James C. Dowling, Franklin & Dowling, Fulton, for appellant.

Gary P. Kraus, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before ULRICH, P.J., and BRECKENRIDGE and SMITH, JJ.

*212
      *ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Leonard Phillips, Sr., appeals the appointment of the public administrator as guardian of his son Leonard Phillips, Jr. He claims that the order was against the weight of the evidence in that he, as the boy’s natural father, should have been appointed. He also claims error in the trial court’s admission of his medical records during cross-examination. Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 9 (Friday, January 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3246-3247]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-917]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 3247]]

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Office of the Secretary


Notice of Interest Rate on Overdue Debts

    Section 30.13 of the Department of Health and Human Services' 
claims collection regulations (45 CFR Part 30) provides that the 
Secretary shall charge an annual rate of interest as fixed by the 
Secretary of the Treasury after taking into consideration private 
consumer rates of interest prevailing on the date that HHS becomes 
entitled to recovery. The rate generally cannot be lower than the 
Department of Treasury's current value of funds rate or the applicable 
rate determined from the ``Schedule of Certified Interest Rates with 
Range of Maturities.'' This rate may be revised quarterly by the 
Secretary of the Treasury and shall be published quarterly by the 
Department of Health and Human Services in the Federal Register.
    The Secretary of the Treasury has certified a rate of 13\5/8\% for 
the quarter ended December 31, 1994. This interest rate will remain in 
effect until such time as the Secretary of the Treasury notifies HHS of 
any change.

    Dated: January 4, 1995.
George Strader,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Finance.
[FR Doc. 95-917 Filed 1-12-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-04-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6105

Dallas Airmotive, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 
GATEWAY 2000, INC.'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 
1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                        516,360
<SECURITIES>                                        0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                 468,691 
<ALLOWANCES>                                   18,968 
<INVENTORY>                                   278,043 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            1,318,342       
<PP&E>                                        429,056      
<DEPRECIATION>                                109,618    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              1,673,411      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         799,769    
<BONDS>                                         7,244  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0 
<PREFERRED>                                         0 
<COMMON>                                          768 
<OTHER-SE>                                    814,773       
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                1,673,411         
<SALES>                                     5,035,228          
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            5,035,228          
<CGS>                                       4,071,601          
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               4,071,601          
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0       
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               21,612      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                637       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               382,716       
<INCOME-TAX>                                  132,037      
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           250,679      
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0      
<CHANGES>                                           0  
<NET-INCOME>                                  250,679 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    3.21 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0 
        

</TABLE>
Organization Name:

Note: Representatives submitting on behalf of an organization must enter information below.

Requestor Representative:

Section 301 Investigation: China's Acts, Policies, and Practices Related to Technology 

Transfer, Intellectual Property, and Innovation - Form to Request Exclusion of Product

When submitting a product exclusion request using this form, enter the specified 

information in the following fields and explain the basis and rationale for your statements. 

By completing this form, you certify that the information provided is complete and 

correct to the best of your knowledge. 

1. Indicate whether the comment contains business confidential information (BCI), is a public

document, or is a public version of a BCI document.

3.

2. Please provide a complete and detailed description of the product of concern:

4.

5. Requestor's relationship to the product:

CONTINUED BELOW

*

10-digit HTSUS item number* for product you wish to address in this product exclusion request:

Use numerical characters only with no special characters (example: 1023456789). For help in finding 

the HTSUS item number associated with your product, see https://hts.usitc.gov/

1

7.

6. Does this submission in regulations.gov include additional attachments?

Please indicate whether any additional attachment contains business confidential

information (BCI), is a public document, or is a public version of a BCI document.

VERSION 1

Requestor Information

Requestor Name (Last, First):

Public Version of BCI

RC1010, 11.2 ton Capacity, 10.13 in Stroke, General Purpose Hydraulic Cylinder; Maximum Operating 

Pressure psi: 10000; Weight Kgs: 6,4; Oil Capacity Advance cm3: 373; Stroke Ranges mm: 240 - 

289

8412210075 Schmidt, Jackie Enerpac Jackie SchmidtImporter Yes Contains BCI
END 2

8. Is this product, or a comparable product, available from sources in the United States?:

VERSION 1

11. Please provide information in support your request, taking account of the instructions

provided in Section B of the Federal Register notice (note: text entered below can extend

beyond the apparent size of this box).

9. Is this product, or a comparable product, available from sources in third countries?:

10. Please provide the value and quantity (with units) of the Chinese-origin product of concern

that you purchased for each calendar year specified. Limit this figure to the products

purchased by your firm (or by members of your trade association) alone. Please provide 

estimates if precise figures are unavailable.

2016 Value:

2015 Value:

2017 Value:

2016 Quantity:

2015 Quantity:

2017 Quantity:

No No BCI BCI BCI BCI BCI BCI

See addendum for additional information.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5378

Alo USA Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 69 (Tuesday, April 11, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 18441]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9011]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD

TIME AND DATE: 9:30 a.m., Tuesday, April 18, 1995.

PLACE: The Board Room , 5th Floor, 490 L'Enfant Plaza, S.W., 
Washington, D.C. 20594.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

6545  Marine Accident Report: Collision Between the Netherlands 
Antilles Passenger Ship NOORDAM and the Maltese Bulk Carrier MOUNT 
YMITOS, Gulf of Mexico, November 6, 1993.
6536  Brief of Pipeline Accident and Recommendations: Excavation-
Caused Pipeline Break and Explosion in Building at 679 East 3rd 
Street, Saint Paul, Minnesota, July 22, 1993.

    News Media Contact: Telephone: (202) 382-0660.

FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT: Bea Hardesty, (202) 382-6525.
Bea Hardesty,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-9011 Filed 4-7-95; 2:57 pm]
BILLING CODE 7533-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6630

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL HILL, a/k/a Saleet, a/k/a Steve

Philip, a/k/a Junito Tomilson,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge.

(CR-96-42-F, CA-97-73-7-F)

Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 29, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Hill, Appellant Pro Se. John Samuel Bowler, Assistant

United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael Hill seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp.

1998), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United

States v. Hill, Nos. CR-96-42-F; CA-97-73-7-F (E.D.N.C. July 17,

1997; Jan. 23, 1998; Mar. 11, 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5129 

To direct the Assistant Secretary of State for Consular Affairs to notify 

United States citizens regarding passport expiration and renewal, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 1, 2023 

Mr. STEUBE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To direct the Assistant Secretary of State for Consular Affairs to notify United States citizens regarding passport 

expiration and renewal, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Passport Notification 

5 Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REQUIRED NOTIFICATION REGARDING PASSPORT 

7 EXPIRATION AND RENEWAL. 

8 (a) REQUIREMENT.—For each United States citizen 

9 in possession of a valid unexpired passport, not later than 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5129 IH

1 180 days prior to the date on which such passport is 

2 scheduled to expire, the Assistant Secretary of State for 

3 Consular Affairs shall provide to the United States cit4 izen— 

5 (1) a notification regarding such pending expi6 ration date; and 

7 (2) information on the process for the renewal 

8 of such passport, including an identification of any 

9 relevant locations at which materials required for 

10 such renewal may be submitted. 

11 (b) FORM.—Each notification required under sub12 section (a) may be submitted in electronic or paper form. 

13 (c) APPLICABILITY.—The requirement under sub14 section (a) shall apply with respect to passports the expi15 ration of which is scheduled to occur on or after the date 

16 that is 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 

17 Act. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 32.1
 AMSURG CORP.
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Christopher A. HoldenChristopher A. HoldenPresident and
Chief Executive Officer of the CompanyFebruary 25, 2010/s/ Claire M. GulmiClaire M. GulmiExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of the CompanyFebruary 25, 2010
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 66 (Thursday, April 6, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 17522]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8409]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE


Public Information Collection Requirement Submitted to the Office 
of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Title: Customer Satisfaction Survey--Generic Clearance Request.
    Type of Request: Expedited Processing--Approval date requested: 30 
days following publication in the Federal Register.
    Number of Respondents: 27,000.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 27,000.
    Average Burden Per Response: 15 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 6,610.
    Needs and Uses: The Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) 
intends to conduct a number of surveys designed to determine the kind 
and quality of service their customers want and expect, as well as 
their satisfaction with DFAS's existing services. The information 
collected thereby, will be used by DFAS to determine where and to what 
extent services are satisfactory, as well as to identify areas in which 
service can be improved.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households; Businesses or other 
for-profit; and Small businesses or organizations.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    OMB Desk Officer: Mr. Edward C. Springer.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Mr. Springer at the Office of Management 
and Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Mr. William Pearce.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Mr. Pearce, WHS/DIOR, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302.

    Dated: March 31, 1995.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 95-8409 Filed 4-5-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 66 (Thursday, April 6, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 17465]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8390]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
50 CFR Part 672

[Docket No. 950206041-5041-01; I.D. 033195A]

Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska; Prohibit Retention of Pacific 
Cod

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Closure.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS is prohibiting retention of Pacific cod by vessels 
catching Pacific cod in the Western Regulatory Area of the Gulf of 
Alaska (GOA) for processing by the inshore component. NMFS is requiring 
that catches of Pacific cod by these vessels in the Western Regulatory 
Area be treated in the same manner as prohibited species and discarded 
at sea with a minimum of injury. This action is necessary because the 
allocation of Pacific cod specified for the inshore component in this 
area has been reached.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 12 noon, Alaska local time (A.l.t.), March 31, 1995, 
until 12 midnight, A.l.t., December 31, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew N. Smoker, 907-586-7228.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The groundfish fishery in the GOA exclusive 
economic zone is managed by NMFS according to the Fishery Management 
Plan for Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska prepared by the North Pacific 
Fishery Management Council under authority of the Magnuson Fishery 
Conservation and Management Act. Fishing by U.S. vessels is governed by 
regulations implementing the FMP at 50 CFR parts 620 and 672.
    In accordance with Sec. 672.20(c)(1)(ii), the allocation of Pacific 
cod total allowable catch (TAC) for the inshore component in the 
Western Regulatory Area, GOA, was established by the final 1995 
specifications of groundfish (60 FR 8470, February 14, 1995), as 18,090 
metric tons (mt).
    The Director, Alaska Region, NMFS, has determined, in accordance 
with Sec. 672.20(c)(3), that the allocation of Pacific cod TAC 
specified for the inshore component in the Western Regulatory Area, 
GOA, has been reached. Therefore, NMFS is requiring that further 
catches of Pacific cod by operators of vessels catching Pacific cod for 
processing by the inshore component in the Western Regulatory Area in 
the GOA, be treated as prohibited species in accordance with 
Sec. 672.20(e).

Classification

    This action is taken under 50 CFR 672.20 and is exempt from review 
under E.O. 12866.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: March 31, 1995.
David S. Crestin,
Acting Director, Office of Fisheries Conservation and Management, 
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 95-8390 Filed 3-31-95; 4:09 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
```