alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6463

Advanced Optowave Corp:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
#### In re Richard IGNATOWSKI, Deceased. Diane IGNATOWSKI, Claimant-Appellant, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Employer-Respondent.

No. 70242.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Oct. 1, 1996.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 29, 1996.

Motion for Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 31,1996.

Application to Transfer Denied Dec. 17,1996.

*10Charles B. Kaiser, II, Chesterfield, for appellant.

Daniel J. Harlan, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Diane Ignatowski (“Claimant”) appeals from the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying her benefits for the accidental death of her husband. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 21, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-41123

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TIRSO PEREZ-OCANAS,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. M-03-CR-342-1

--------------------

Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Tirso Perez-Ocanas appeals the sentence imposed following

his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States

after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

Perez-Ocanas argues that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) is unconstitutional

on its face and as applied to him. He thus contends that his

sentence should not exceed the maximum term of imprisonment

prescribed in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). 
No. 03-41123

-2-

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. Perez-Ocanas acknowledges that his argument

is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision

has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466,

490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further

review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
INPUT

100
Consistent with USTR's Section 301 notice, OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. requests

confidential treatment for the information designated as business confidential in this submission. Such

information consists of information that would not customarily be released to the public, including

business or trade secrets regarding production costs and processes, data on sales, product characteristics

customers, destinations, and other product, sales, and cost-related business secrets. Business confidential

information has been indicated herein by enclosing it in single brackets (“[ ]”). A public version of these

comments is also being filed with all confidential information removed.

OMRON in the US is the only designer of this product and only supplier of this component.

KNOB POWER SEAT SWITCH is a molded plastic switch cover, and is used only for automotive

purposes of actuating power seat switches, of which is an OEM-specified dimension. It is only used for

further assembly of components which go into domestic automobile production, which is specified by

auto manufacturer.

This product is not a target of the US Administration's 301 investigation regarding Intellectual Property

concerns. This is not a concern to IP transfer and impressment. This product contains no IP of interest

related to autonomous vehicle production.

The tariff action ultimately poses a risk of significant damage to OMRON, the domestic automobile

industry, and ultimately the US consumer as a increase in price. Like in the case of similar approvals for

vehicle components at the HTS level, OMRON views this product in the same manner. Immediate

movement of production to a US manufacturer or another country would pose significant re-tooling

costs, significant amounts of time, and approvals pertaining to consumer automobile safety standards are

costly and would take a significant amount of time to obtain.

OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. believes that CBP can easily exclude the KNOB POWER

SEAT SWITCH in question based solely on the product description. The following are draft CBP

exclusion instructions:

"KNOB POWER SEAT SWITCH rectangular plastic knob with rounded ends with two flat latches on

either end which run parallel to the length of the knob "Plastic Bench knob Made of plastic resin - ABS with Dimensions 61.00 mm X 20.00 mm X 11.80 m

This information will be contained on the invoice from the supplier.
#### Karen A. BALDRIDGE, Appellant, v. COMMERCE BANK OF ST. LOUIS, N.A., Respondent.

No. 68252.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

June 18, 1996.

W. Morris Taylor, William K. Meehan, Clayton, for appellant.

Gregory F. Herkert, James T. Barry, Jr., Clayton, for respondent.

Before CRAHAN, P.J., and CRANDALL and DOWD, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Karen A. Baldridge (“Baldridge”) appeals from the circuit court’s judgment awarding Respondent costs and attorney’s fees under Rule 90.18(b). We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight *of*evidence; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

We further grant Respondent’s motion for costs and attorney’s fees on this appeal pursuant to Rule 90.18(c) and Rule 84.21.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 6 (Tuesday, January 10, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 2625]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-713]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

Time and Date: 11:00 a.m., Tuesday, January 17, 1995.

Place: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, C Street 
entrance between 20th and 21st Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered:

    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal 
Reserve System employees.
    2. Any items carried forward from a previously announced 
meeting.

Contact Person for More Information: Mr. Joseph R. Coyne, Assistant to 
the Board; (202) 452-3204. You may call (202) 452-3207, beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before this meeting, for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting.

    Dated: January 6, 1995.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-713 Filed 1-6-95; 3:23 pm]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6295

OSRAM Opto Semiconductors, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China. 

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3341

Rikon Power Tools Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 66 (Thursday, April 6, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 17523]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8481]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Army Science Board; Open Meeting

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (P.L. 92-463), announcement is made of the following 
Committee Meeting:

    Name of Committee: Army Science Board (ASB).
    Date of Meeting: 20 and 21 April 1995.
    Time of Meeting: 0900-1600, 20 April 1995; 0900-1200, 21 April 
1995.
    Place: Alexandria, VA.
    Agenda: The Army Science Board (ASB) Independent Assessment 
Panel on ``Army Family Housing'' will hold a meeting to review 
current Army Family Housing policies and issues and to examine new 
business and privatization alternatives. These meetings will be open 
to the public. Any interested person may attend, appear before, or 
file statements with the committee at the time and in the manner 
permitted by the committee. The ASB Administrative Officer, Sally 
Warner, may be contacted for further information at (703) 695-0781.
Sally A. Warner,
Administrative Officer, Army Science Board.
[FR Doc. 95-8481 Filed 4-5-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 3, 2019

No. 04-18-00821-CR

Jake Eric ALVARADO,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 38th Judicial District Court, Medina County, Texas

Trial Court No. 16-10-12125-CR

Honorable Camile Glasscock Dubose, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The State’s brief was originally due to be filed on March 28, 2019. On April 1, 2019, the 

State filed a motion for extension of time to file its brief requesting a 90-day extension of the 

deadline. The motion is GRANTED. Given the length of the extension, THIS IS THE FINAL 

EXTENSION OF TIME THAT THE STATE WILL BE GRANTED. The State’s brief must 

be filed by June 26, 2019.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 3rd day of April, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

April 12, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4433

ECM Industries LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_04.15.19.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ITEM 7
OF FORM 1O-KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000897545
<NAME>                        LS CAPITAL CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>               1
<CASH>                        0
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              0
<PP&E>                        22
<DEPRECIATION>                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                22
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         946
<BONDS>                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      217
<OTHER-SE>                    (1142)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  22
<SALES>                       3
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              3
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              750
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (12)
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (12)
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  (12)
<EPS-BASIC>                 0
<EPS-DILUTED>                 0



</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Zonagen, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K/A for the year ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Louis Ploth, Jr., Vice President, Business Development and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: April 29, 2005 /s/ Louis Ploth, Jr.Louis Ploth, Jr.Vice President, Business Development and Chief
Financial Officer
Zonagen, Inc.
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 72 (Friday, April 14, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 19102]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9259]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Science Resources Studies; Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Science Resources Studies.
    Date and Time: May 5, 1995, 9 a.m.-3 p.m.
    Place: Room 970, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: Ann Lanier, Project Director for the Survey of 
Academic Research Facilities, National Science Foundation, Suite 
965, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone: (703) 
306-1774.
    Purpose of Meeting: To review and comment on the revision to the 
questionnaire that will be used for 1996 Survey of Scientific and 
Engineering Research Facilities at Colleges and Universities.
    Agenda: The morning will be used by the advisory panel to review 
and comment on the survey instrument. The afternoon will be used to 
review modification to the data collection.

    Dated: April 11, 1995.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-9259 Filed 4-13-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
```
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6824

United Scope LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_05.09.19.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
1 United States Court of Appeals,

Fifth Circuit.
No. 94-41242.CSI HYDROSTATIC TESTERS, INC. and Subsidiaries, PetitionersAppellees,

v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellant. Aug. 30, 1995. Appeal from the United States Tax Court. Before WISDOM, DUHÉ and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
The Commissioner of Internal R evenue appeals from the tax
court's decision finding no deficiency in tax for the tax year 1987. We agree with the tax court's thorough opinion reported at
103 T.C. No. 21, 1994 WL 466342 (1994), and, finding that the Commissioner has not raised any arguments on appeal that were not adequately treated by the tax court, adopt that opinion and AFFIRM the judgment.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 68 (Monday, April 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 18096]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8680]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Texas Gas Transmission Corp.; Notice of Informal Settlement 
Conference

April 4, 1995.
    Take notice that an informal settlement conference will be convened 
in the above-captioned proceeding commencing at 10:00 am on April 11, 
1995, and continuing at 9:00 am on April 12, 1995, at the offices of 
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 810 First Street, NE, 
Washington, DC, for the purpose of exploring the possible settlement of 
the above-referenced docket.
    Any party, as defined by 18 CFR 385.102(c), or any participant as 
defined in 18 CFR 385.102(b), is invited to attend. Persons wishing to 
become a party must move to intervene and receive intervenor status 
pursuant to the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 385.214).
    For additional information please contact Michael D. Cotleur, (202) 
208-1076, or Russell B. Mamone (202) 208-0744.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-8680 Filed 4-7-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M