alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

August 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6360

C&U Americas, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 69 (Tuesday, April 11, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 18441]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9036]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, April 13, 1995.

PLACE: 6th Floor, 1730 K Street N.W., Washington, D.C.

STATUS: Open.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider and act upon the 
following:

    1. Energy West Mining Co., Docket No. WEST 92-216-R (Issues 
include whether the judge erred in granting summary decision in 
resolving a disputed citation of violation of the ventilation plan.)
    2. U.S. Coal Inc., Docket No. SE 93-119. (Issues include whether 
the judge erred in concluding that the negligence of a non-
supervisory employee, who is a certified electrician, is imputable 
to the operator for the purpose of assessing civil penalties.)
    Any person attending this meeting who requires special 
accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 
interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. 
Subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and 2706.160(e).

CONTANCT PERSON FOR MORE INFO: Jean Ellen (202) 653-5629/(202) 708-9300 
for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.
Jean H. Ellen,
Chief, Docket Clerk.
[FR Doc. 95-9036 Filed 4-7-95; 3:06 pm]
BILLING CODE 6735-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of North Penn Bancorp, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Frederick L. Hickman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.




Date:         November 10, 2005                  /s/ Frederick L. Hickman
              ------------------------           -------------------------------
                                                 Frederick L. Hickman
                                                 President and Chief Executive
                                                 Officer
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Paul O. SOMMERER, Appellant.

No. WD 51550.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

June 18, 1996.

Grant W. Smith, Linn, for appellant.

Robert W. Russell, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before LAURA DENVIR STITH, P.J., and ULRICH and SMART, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Defendant-Appellant Paul Otto Sommerer was convicted of two counts of failure to obey an Ex Parte Order of Protection. On appeal, he alleges error in failing to require a formal arraignment following amendment of the date of the violation alleged in one of the counts of the information. We have reviewed the briefs and the record on appeal and find no error. Because a published opinion reciting the detailed facts and applicable principles of law would have no precedential value, we affirm by this summary order, but have provided the parties with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth our reasoning.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of North Penn Bancorp, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Frederick L. Hickman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.




Date: August 14, 2007                  /s/ Frederick L. Hickman
      ---------------                  ------------------------
                                       Frederick L. Hickman
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer
Order filed January 14, 2014.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 13

- 00850

- CV

____________ THE ESTATE OF MARGAR ET KLOVENSKI, JAKE K LOVENSKI, AND MARY HASSLER, INDIVI DUALLY AND AS NEXT F RIENDS , Appellant s

V.
DR. ASHISH KAPOOR, App ellee

On Appeal from the 113th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2009

- 31943



### O R D E R

Appellant s ’ brief was due December 16, 2013

. No brief or motion for
extension of time has been filed.

Unless appellant s file their brief wi th the clerk of this court on or before February 7, 2014 , the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).PER CURIAM
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 7086

TYRELL HILL , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. STEPHEN T. MOYER, Interim Secretary; RICHARD GRAHAM, Warden; RICHARD RODERICK, Case Manager; BENJAMIN BRADLEY, Case Manager , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Paul W. Grimm , District Judge. ( 8:17

- cv
- 01994

- PWG )

Submitted : February 26, 2019 Decided: March 1, 2019

Before KING, THACKER, and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Tyrell Hill, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Tyrell Hill appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants summary judgment on his claims alleging Defendants erroneously failed to correct misinformation in his prison file

. We have considered Hill’s arguments in conjunction with the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court ’s order

. See Hill v Moyer , No. 8:17

- cv
- 01994

- PWG (D. Md

. July 27, 2018 ). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ERIC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. GREGOR

Y A. C OX, De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 15-30137

D.C . No. 2:05-c r-00202-SM J M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Ea ste rn Distric t of W a shington Sa lva dor M e ndoz a , Jr., Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d Fe brua

ry 24, 2016 * * B e fore : LEAVY, FER NANDEZ, a

nd R AW LINSON, C irc uit Judge s. Gre gory A. C ox a ppe a ls from the distric t

c o urt’ s judgm e nt a

nd c ha lle nge s the s e nte n c e of 12 m onths a nd one da y im pose d upon re voc ation of supervise d re le a se . W e have jurisdic tion under 28 U.S.C . § 1291, a nd we a ffirm . 

# FIL ED

FEB 29 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).C ox c onte nds tha t the distric t c ourt proc e dura lly e rre d by le ngthe ning his se nte nc e in orde r to prom o t e re ha bilita tion a nd by fa iling to e xpla in its re a sons for re je c ting his a

rgum e nts in fa

vor of a within-Guide line s se nte nc e . W e re vie w for pla i n e rror, se eUnite d State s v . Grant , 664 F.3d 276, 279 (9th C ir. 2011), a nd find none . Although the

c ourt did discuss its hope tha t C ox would de a l with his substa nc e a buse proble m

while in c ustody , it did not im pose or le ngthe n his se nte nc e to prom ote re ha

bilita tion. Se eid. at 281. M ore ove r, the c ourt a de quate ly e xpla ine d the se nt e nc e im pose d . Se eUnite d State

s v . C arty , 520 F.3d 984, 992 (9th C ir. 2008) (e n ba

nc ). C ox a lso c onte nds tha

t his se nte nc e is substa

ntive ly unre a sona

ble be c a use it is gre ate r tha

n ne c e ssa ry to a c c o m p lish thegoa ls of se nte nc ing. Thedistric t c ourt did not a buse its disc re tion in im

posing C ox’ s se nte nc e . Se eGall v . Unite d State s , 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The a bove -Guide line s se nte nc e is substa ntive ly re a s ona ble in light of the

18 U.S.C . § 3583(e ) se nte nc ing fa c tors a nd the tota lity

of the c irc um s ta

nc e s, inc luding C ox’ s re p e ate d use of m e tha m phe tam ine and fa ilure to be de t e rre d

by a prior re voc ation se nte nc e . Se eGall , 552 U.S. a t 51. AFFIRM E D.

1 5 - 3 0 1 3 7 2
Order entered November 21, 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-18-01398-CV

IN RE JAIME COVARRUBIAS, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 292nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F99-32080-QV



### ORDER Before Justices Bridges, Brown, and Boatright

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS relator’s petition for writ of

mandamus for want of jurisdiction.

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES
JUSTICE
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

July 26, 2010 

p0719 

Order 

 

July 26, 2010 

140612 & (14) 

 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140612 

 COA: 294215 

Wayne CC: 06-001959-01 

JOSEPH HINES, III, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 29, 2009 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The 

motion to hold the appeal in abeyance is DENIED. 

CORRIGAN, J., not participating for the reasons stated in People v Parsons, order of 

the Supreme Court, entered March 6, 2007 (Docket No. 132975).
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

April 12, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6764

Apex Sourcing & Manufacturing: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_04.15.19.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6941

Pentair Filtration Solutions LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
---

---

Exhibit 15.3

# CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

|We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File
Nos. 333-96929 and 333-127340) of our report dated January 26, 2007 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Magal Security Systems Ltd. included in
this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006.
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Mexico, D F      
                 
June 25, 2007 |  | /s/ Salles, Sáinz - Grant Thornton, S. C.
Salles, Sáinz - Grant Thornton, S. C.By: Hector Bautista
|------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
Unassociated Document


    
      AMENDMENT TO 2010 DIRECTORS’ EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN

       

                  The
Quigley Corporation, a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), hereby
adopts this Amendment (this “Amendment”) to 2010
Directors’ Equity Compensation Plan (the ‘Plan”).

       

      WITNESSETH

       

      WHEREAS, the Company’s
Compensation Committee adopted the Plan and the Board of Directors (the “Board”) ratified the
Plan; and

      


      WHEREAS, the Plan was
submitted to and ratified by the Company’s stockholders at the Company’s Annual
Meeting of Stockholders on May 5, 2010.

      


      NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is
hereby amended as follows:

       

      1.           Section
4 of the Plan is amended by deleting the seventh sentence from said Section and
replacing in lieu thereof the following sentence:

      


      “Awards
may, in the discretion of the Committee, be awarded under the Plan in assumption
of, or in substitution for, outstanding Awards previously granted by the
Company, any of its Affiliates or any of their respective predecessors, or any
entity acquired by the Company or with which the Company combines; provided however, subject to
Section 8 hereof, that without stockholder approval (i) the terms of outstanding
Awards may not be amended to reduce the exercise price of outstanding Options
and (ii) outstanding Options may not be cancelled in exchange for cash, other
awards or Options with an exercise price that is less than the exercise price of
the original Options.”

      


      2.           This
Amendment shall be effective as of May 6, 2010, and all references to the Plan
shall, from and after such time, be deemed to be references to the Plan as
amended hereby.

       

      3.           Except
as expressly amended hereby, the Plan shall remain unchanged and in full force
and effect.
Amendment No. 3 to Employment Agreement - W. John Nelson



 Exhibit 10.4 

AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO 

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

WHEREAS, Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC (“Company”) and W. John Nelson (“Executive”) entered into an
Employment Agreement dated as of May 1, 2007 (“Agreement”) and as previously amended; 

WHEREAS, all defined terms used herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Agreement unless specifically
defined herein; 
 WHEREAS, as of February 23, 2010 the Compensation Committee (“Committee”)
of the Board of Directors of ON Semiconductor Corporation considered and approved an increase, effective January 1, 2010, of the maximum target bonus percentage for the Executive from 75% to 80% of his Base Salary during the applicable
Performance Cycle under a bonus Program established and approved by the Committee and/or Board; and 

WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive now wish to amend the Agreement to reflect the increase to the maximum target
bonus percentage to 80% consistent with the Board’s and Committee’s approvals and make certain related conforming changes to the Agreement. 

NOW, THEREFORE, for mutual consideration the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

 1. Effective January 1, 2010, Section 2(b) of the Agreement related to “Compensation” is hereby amended by replacing such
section in its entirety with the following: 
 “(b) In addition to the Base Salary, during the Employment
Period, the Executive shall be eligible to participate in the bonus program established and approved by the Board (the “Program”) and, pursuant to the Program, the Executive may earn a bonus (the “Bonus”) on an annual or other
performance period basis (a “Performance Cycle”) of up to a maximum target of 80% of Base Salary earned during the applicable Performance Cycle or an additional amount as approved by the Board under the Program and in each case based on
certain performance criteria; provided that the Executive is actively employed by the Company on the date the Bonuses are paid under the Program, except as provided in Section 5(a) herein. The Bonus may be paid annually or more frequently
depending upon the Performance Cycle, as determined by the Board and pursuant to the Program. The Bonus will be specified by the Board, and the Bonus will be reviewed at least annually by the Board.” 

 

 1 








 2. This Agreement shall amend only the provisions of the Agreement as set forth herein. Those provisions of
the Agreement not expressly amended shall be considered in full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive
and the Company have executed this Amendment as of the 24 day of March, 2010. 
  

									
	COMPANY:	 		 	Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC
					
		 		 		 	By:	 	 /s/ COLLEEN MCKEOWN

		 		 		 	Name:	 	Colleen McKeown
		 		 		 	Title:	 	Senior Vice President of Human Resources
			
	EXECUTIVE:	 		 	W. John Nelson, in his individual capacity
					
		 		 		 	By:	 	 /s/ W. JOHN NELSON

		 		 		 	Name:	 	W. John Nelson
		 		 		 	Title:	 	 Executive Vice President & Chief

Operating Officer


  

 2