alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order filed May 5, 2022 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-21-00589-CV

____________

SYLVIA COOKE, Appellant

V.

RACHEL BAIER, Appellee

On Appeal from County Court at Law No 2

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CV-0087510

ORDER

Appellee’s brief filed April 13, 2022, requests this court dismiss the appeal 

on the grounds it was not timely filed, and appellant’s brief was not timely filed. 

The request is denied. 

Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed within 15 days of the date the notice 

of appeal was due. A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when the 

perfecting instrument is filed within 15 days of its due date. Verburgt v. Dorner, 
959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). While an extension may be implied, appellant is 

obligated to come forward with a reasonable explanation to support the late filing. 

See Miller v. Greenpark Surgery Center Assocs., Ltd., 974 S.W.2d 805, 808 (Tex. 

App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, no pet.). Appellant filed a motion to extend time 

to file the notice of appeal and the motion was granted. Accordingly, this court has 

jurisdiction over the appeal.

Appellant’s brief was e-filed two minutes after midnight on the due date. We

decline to dismiss the appeal on that basis.

Appellee may file an amended brief within 30 days of the date of this order

addressing the issues raised in appellant’s brief. If no amended brief is filed, the 

appeal will be set for submission on appellee’s brief filed April 13, 2022.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wise and Jewell.
#### Myrtle J. SEXTON, Appellant, v. Carondelet MANOR, Respondent.

No. WD 52102.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

June 18, 1996.

Harvey L. McCormich, Kansas City, for Appellant.

Thomas Y. Clinkenbeard, Kansas City, for Respondent.

Before LOWENSTEIN, P.J., and HANNA and SPINDEN, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

From two Workers’ Compensation awards, one granting and the other denying relief, the employee filed one appeal asserting the results were not supported by competent and substantial evidence. The Commission dismissed the appeal.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of iVoice Technology, Inc. ("the
Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Jerome
Mahoney, President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:


1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                       Date: January 16, 2007

                                       By /s/ Jerome Mahoney
                                       ---------------------
                                       Jerome Mahoney
                                       President, Chief Executive Officer and
                                       Principal Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 66 (Thursday, April 6, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 17523]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8410]



[[Page 17523]]

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Science Board 1995 Summer Study Task Force on Technology 
Investments for 21st Century Military Superiority, Hostile Capabilities 
Team

ACTION: Cancellation of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The meeting notice for the Defense Science Board 1995 Summer 
Study Task Force on Technology Investments for 21st Century Military 
Superiority, Hostile Capabilities Team scheduled for April 4-5, 1995 as 
published in the Federal Register (Vol. 60, No. 57, Page 15538, Friday, 
March 24, 1995, FR Doc 95-7222) was cancelled.

    Dated: March 31, 1995.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 95-8410 Filed 4-5-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5847

Scosche Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
#### In the Matter of Christopher Tendorf, Appellant, v Catherine Delmonte, Respondent.

(Appeal No. 1.)

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, petition reinstated and matter remitted to Erie County Family Court for further proceedings, in accordance with the following memorandum: The matters must be remitted for a hearing because Family Court erred in summarily dismissing, *sua sponte,*four petitions. The petitions sought custody of the children, modification of visitation and support, and charged respondent with menacing *(see, Matter of Smith v Jacobson,*134 AD2d 676; *Mosesku v Mosesku,*108 AD2d 795). (Appeal from order of Erie County Family Court, Killeen, J.—family offense.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green, Pine and Lowery, JJ.
================================================================================

Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report  of Scala Minerals, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for  the   period   ended   March 31, 2006 as  filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission   on   the   date hereof (the "Report"),  the
undersigned,  in the capacities and   on   the   dates   indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as   adopted  pursuant to Section
906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to her knowledge:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements  of  Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  May 15, 2006


/s/ Elena Krioukova
-------------------------------------------
Elena Krioukova, President and C.E.O.
(Principal Executive Officer)
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5932

Camco Manufacturing, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests. 

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 9 (Friday, January 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 3198]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-866]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary of the Army

Notice of Intent to Prepare a Draft Environmental Impact 
Statement (DEIS) for Projects and Activities Associated With Future 
Programs at Aberdeen Proving Ground

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DOD.

ACTION: Notice of Intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Public Law 91-190, the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, the Draft Environmental Impact 
Statement (DEIS) is being prepared to evaluate environmental 
implications of future decisions regarding operation of Aberdeen 
Proving Ground. The DEIS will focus on impacts of planned future 
activities at Aberdeen Proving Ground; development alternatives for the 
installation Master Plan; development potential of the installation in 
terms of environmental carrying capacity; and specific concerns 
regarding risk. Issues to be considered in the proposed action include 
acceptance of those new programs projected for the installation to 
include modernization or removal of outdated facilities, and 
improvements to infrastructure, utilities and service necessary to 
accommodate the new missions and changes in existing test and 
evaluation missions. All missions on the installation will be 
considered including the Combat Systems Test Activity, the Chemical and 
Biological Defense Command and the Army Research Laboratory. The Army 
will conduct several small group scoping workshops prior to preparing 
the Environmental Impact statement. The first step will be to determine 
the appropriate scope of issues, activities and alternatives to be 
addressed. Among the anticipated areas to be evaluated are public 
health risks and public safety, noise, shock and vibration, water 
quality, air quality, hazardous materials management and disposal, 
biological resources including threatened and endangered species social 
and economic effects, and historic and archaeological resources. During 
the scoping process, the Army will ask other agencies that have 
regulatory interest in Aberdeen Proving Ground to participate in 
scoping.

DATES: Written public comments and suggestions can be submitted by 
February 13, 1995 to the address shown below.

ADDRESSES: Commander, Aberdeen Proving Ground Support Activity, ATTN: 
STEAP-SH-ER (Edward L. Newell, Jr.) Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland 
21005-5423.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Edward L. Newell, Jr., (410) 278-6756.

    Dated: January 4, 1995.
Lewis D. Walker,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army (Environmental, Safety and 
Occupational Health), OASA (I,L&E).
[FR Doc. 95-866 Filed 1-12-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 70 (Wednesday, April 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 18607]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9031]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of the Secretary


Bay-Delta Advisory Council; Notice of Establishment

    This notice is published in accordance with Section 9(a)(2) of the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463). Following consultation 
with the General Services Administration, notice is hereby given that 
the Secretary of the Interior is establishing the Bay-Delta Advisory 
Council. The purpose of the Bay-Delta Advisory Council shall be to 
provide advice on the development of a long-term solution for problems 
affecting the public values in the California San Francisco Bay, 
Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and its watershed Estuary.
    Further information regarding the advisory council may be obtained 
from the Bureau of Reclamation, Department of the Interior, 1849 C 
Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20241.
    The certification of establishment is published below.

Certification

    I hereby certify that establishment of the Bay-Delta Advisory 
Council is in the public interest in connection with the performance of 
duties imposed on the Department of the Interior by 30 U.S.C. 1-8.

    Dated: January 31, 1995.
Bruce Babbitt,
Secretary of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 95-9031 Filed 4-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-10-M
EXHIBIT
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Juma Technology, Corp. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony M.
      Servidio, the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section. 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Anthony
                M. ServidioAnthony
                M. Servidio
              Chief
                Executive Officer and
              Chairman





May
      14,
      2008
EXHIBIT 12.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 302(A) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jacob Even-Ezra:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Magal Security Systems
Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
Subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [Reserved]

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

July 14, 2006

/s/ Jacob Even-Ezra*
--------------------
Jacob Even-Ezra
Chief Executive Officer

     * The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at
the Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6478

OK International, Inc:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_05.09.19.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**STATEMENTOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the “Form 10-Q”) ofCardinal Financial Corporation, I, Robert A. Cern, Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,to my knowledge:

 

(a)                                  theForm 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(b)                                 the information contained in the Form10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financialcondition and results of operations of the Company and its subsidiaries as of,and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.

 
| Date: August 9, 2005 | /s/ Robert A. Cern                                    |   |
|---------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                      | Robert A. Cern                                        |
|                      | Executive Vice President and Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
Order filed March 18 , 2015

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 15

- 00228

- CV

____________ S.C. MAXWELL FAMILY PARTNERSHIP, LTD , Appellant

V.
THOMAS KENT AND NANC Y KENT , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 335th District Court Washington County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 35517



### ORDER
This is an appeal from a judgment signed March 5, 2015 . A related case was previously filed in the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas under ca u se number 01

- 14

- 00451

- CV.

It is ORDERED that the appeal docketed under this court’s appellate cause number 14

- 15

- 00228

- CV is transferred to the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas pursuant to Local Rule 1.5 14th Tex. App. (Houston) Loc. R. 1.5. The Clerk of this Court is dir ected to transfer all papers filed in this case, and certify all Orders made, to the Court of Appeals for the
First District of Texas.

PER CURIAM
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7841

MICHAEL ANGELO ROBINSON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

EARL BESHEARS; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE

OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.

(CA-97-1358)

Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 21, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Angelo Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,

Attorney General, Annabelle Louise Lisic, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY

GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. Robinson v. Beshears, No. CA-97-1358 (D. Md.

Nov. 26, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED