alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4709

II-VI Incorporated:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

“Made in China 2025” or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 9 (Friday, January 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 3276]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-869]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Materials Research; Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463 as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Materials Research.
    Date and time: January 31, 1995, 8:30 am-5:00 pm.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Rooms 
1020 and 1060, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of meeting: Closed.
    Contact person: Dr. Lorretta J. Inglehart, Program Director, 
Instrumentation for Materials Research Program, Division of 
Materials Research, Room 1065, National Science Foundation, 
Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone (703) 306-1817.
    Purpose of meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning support for Instrumentation Proposals.
    Agenda: Evaluation of proposals.
    Reason for closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information, financial data such as salaries, and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. 
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b.(c) (4) and (6) of the 
Government in Sunshine Act.

    Dated: January 9, 1995.
Linda Allen-Benton,
Deputy Division Director, HRM.
[FR Doc. 95-869 Filed 1-12-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
$[ ] [ ]

INPUT

.05

80
Consistent with USTR's Section 301 notice, OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. requests

confidential treatment for the information designated as business confidential in this submission. Such

information consists of information that would not customarily be released to the public, including

business or trade secrets regarding production costs and processes, data on sales, product characteristics

customers, destinations, and other product, sales, and cost-related business secrets. Business confidential

information has been indicated herein by enclosing it in single brackets (“[ ]”). A public version of these

comments is also being filed with all confidential information removed.

OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. submits this exclusion request on behalf of our business

unit. OMRON in the US is the only designer of this product and only supplier of this component.

PLUNGER,T201/X001/381 is a used to actuate a power window switch, and is used only automotive

purposes, which is an OEM-specified dimension. It is only used for further assembly of components

which go into domestic automobile production, which is specified by auto manufacturer.

This product is not a target of the US Administration's 301 investigation regarding Intellectual Property

concerns. This is not a concern to IP transfer and impressment. This product contains no IP of interest

related to autonomous vehicle production.

The tariff action ultimately poses a risk of significant damage to OMRON, the domestic automobile

industry, and ultimately the US consumer as a increase in price. Like in the case of similar approvals for

vehicle components at the HTS level, OMRON views this product in the same manner. Immediate

movement of production to a US manufacturer or another country would pose significant re-tooling

costs, significant amounts of time, and approvals pertaining to consumer automobile safety standards are

costly and would take a significant amount of time to obtain.

OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. believes that CBP can easily exclude the

PLUNGER,T201/X001/381 in question based solely on the product description. The following are draft

CBP exclusion instructions:

"PLUNGER,T201/X001/381 for POWER WINDOW SWITCH; rectangular plastic plunger with all four

corners notched the entire length used to control tactile feeling. Made of plastic resin - DUPONT

DELRIN 500P- POM NAL; dimensions 5.52 mm x 3.95mm x13.0mm."

This information will be contained on the invoice from the supplier.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6338

CW Bearing USA, Inc:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 66 (Thursday, April 6, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 17534]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8414]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION


Public Buildings Service; Proposed Port of Entry, Located at 
Pacific Highway, Blaine, Whatcom County, WA; Notice of Availability for 
a Draft Environmental Impact Statement

    The general Services Administration (GSA) hereby gives notice a 
Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) has been prepared in 
accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, 
as amended. The DEIS was prepared for the proposed expansion of the 
Port of Entry located at Pacific Highway, Blaine, Whatcom County, 
Washington. The DEIS is being made available March 31, 1995. GSA is the 
lead Federal agency for the preparation of the EIS. The DEIS evaluates 
the proposed action, the no-action, and three (3) design alternatives.
    Written comments should be as specific as possible and may address 
the adequacy of the EIS, the merits of the alternatives discussed, the 
impacts identified, and/or mitigation measures recommended and be sent 
no later than May 15, 1995 to GSA's EIS subconsultant, Berger/ABAM, at 
the following address: 33301 Ninth Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003.
    Comments will also be accepted at a public meeting to be held on 
April 19, 1995, at the Blaine Senior Center, 763 ``G'' Street, Blaine, 
Washington 98230. The meeting will be held from 5:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m.
    Representatives of GSA and Berger/ABAM will receive comments from 
interested parties regarding the proposed project, the environmental 
analysis, and proposed mitigation measures. All comments received will 
be made a part of the administrative record for the DEIS and will be 
evaluated as part of the Final EIS review process.

    For further information contact Donna M. Meyer, Regional 
Environmental Program Officer, General Services Administration, Public 
Buildings Service (10PL), 400 15th Street SW., Auburn, Washington 
98001-6599, or at (206) 931-7675.


    Dated: March 24, 1995.

L. Jay Pearson,

Regional Administrator (10A).

[FR Doc. 95-8414 Filed 4-5-95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-23-M
#### David Carl FOLSOM, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 42847.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Feb. 26, 1991.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 2, 1991.

Application to Transfer Denied May 3, 1991.

John E. Cash, Kansas City, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Geoffrey W. Preckshot, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before SHANGLER, P.J., and KENNEDY and FENNER, JJ.

*716ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from denial of Rule 27.26 motion for post-conviction relief.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
0000000002290Z10 

* 

# 

14# 

0 la fAilt-1 

ta014-5- 

AL945- 

T05 3 . 30 

2gg.7 1:12 

B120533000000000 

2124.2 

tzA -0- LA 

-0- -0-
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5341 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5341

 To exclude from gross income certain assistance provided to farmers, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 5, 2023

Ms. Adams (for herself, Mr. Kildee, Mr. Scott of Virginia, Mr. Davis of 
   North Carolina, Ms. Bush, Mr. Bishop of Georgia, Ms. Pingree, Ms. 
 Strickland, Ms. Sewell, Ms. McClellan, and Mr. Nickel) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To exclude from gross income certain assistance provided to farmers, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Family Farmer and Rancher Tax 
Fairness Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. TAX TREATMENT OF CERTAIN ASSISTANCE TO FARMERS, ETC.

    For purposes of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, in the case of 
any payment described in section 1006(e) of the American Rescue Plan 
Act of 2021 (as amended by section 22007 of Public Law 117-169) or 
section 22006 of Public Law 117-169--
            (1) such payment shall not be included in the gross income 
        of the person on whose behalf, or to whom, such payment is 
        made,
            (2) no deduction shall be denied, no tax attribute shall be 
        reduced, and no basis increase shall be denied, by reason of 
        the exclusion from gross income provided by paragraph (1), and
            (3) in the case of a partnership or S corporation on whose 
        behalf, or to whom, such a payment is made--
                    (A) any amount excluded from income by reason of 
                paragraph (1) shall be treated as tax exempt income for 
                purposes of sections 705 and 1366 of such Code, and
                    (B) except as provided by the Secretary of the 
                Treasury (or the Secretary's delegate), any increase in 
                the adjusted basis of a partner's interest in a 
                partnership under section 705 of such Code with respect 
                to any amount described in subparagraph (A) shall equal 
                the partner's distributive share of deductions 
                resulting from interest that is part of such payment 
                and the partner's share, as determined under section 
                752 of such Code, of principal that is part of such 
                payment.
                                 <all>
```
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5963

New Beverage Ventures:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of GLOBAL EPOINT, INC. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Toresa Lou, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |  |  |                                   
|-------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------
|April 13, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/    TORESA LOU                 
|               |  |  |  | Toresa Lou Chief Executive Officer



In connection with the
Annual Report of GLOBAL EPOINT, INC. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John Pan, Chief Financial Officer
and Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |  |  |                                              
|-------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------
|April 13, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/    JOHN PAN                              
|               |  |  |  | John Pan Chief Financial Officer and Chairman



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5113

Radio Systems Corp:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_5-30-2019.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
#### Earnest J. CLARK, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 47339.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Sept. 21, 1993.

Lew A. Kollias, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before ULRICH, P.J., and BERREY and SMART, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from the denial of a Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

April 12, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6429

Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_04.15.19.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
#### Ex parte William Carl ETHRIDGE.

No. 72094.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 24, 1995.

William Carl Ethridge, Attorney pro se.

Robert Huttash, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

*OPINION*

PER CURIAM.

This is a post-conviction application for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to Arti-*207ele 11.07, § 2, V.A.C.C.P. Applicant was convicted of possession of methamphetamine. Punishment was assessed at ten years imprisonment. No appeal was taken from this conviction.

Applicant contends that his parole on this conviction expired before the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles issued a notice of intent to revoke this parole, and that the Board should therefore be barred from revoking the parole. The trial court has entered findings, supported by the record, that applicant committed and was convicted of a new offense while on parole from this conviction, but that the Board of Pardons and Paroles has not revoked this parole and has determined that the attempt to revoke applicant’s parole was untimely. However, the record also establishes that the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, is treating Applicant as a parole violator and is computing his eligibility for release pursuant to this conviction rather than his new, shorter, conviction.

Article 42.18, Y.A.C.C.P., provides that the Board of Pardons and Paroles has sole authority to revoke parole or mandatory supervision, and § 14(a) provides the Board with discretion to continue a conditional release even after a finding that the releasee has committed a new offense. Therefore, the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, is not authorized to consider an inmate as a parole violator until such time as the Board of Pardons and Paroles issues an order revoking the parole. Applicant is entitled to relief.

Relief is granted. The Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, shall modify applicant’s records to delete any reference to this conviction in computing applicant’s eligibility for release.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional and Pardons and Paroles Divisions.