alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-5196

Bergstrom, Inc: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4816

Enerpac:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 26, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-6094

Peabody Energy Corporation:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1966
CARL G. ELY; GILDA ELY, Administrators of the Estate of Carl G. Ely, Jr., deceased, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus FORTIER LOSS CONTROL CONSULTANTS, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. Glen M. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-25-2) Submitted: January 29, 2003 Decided: March 12, 2003 Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Carl E. McAfee, MCAFEE LAW FIRM, P.C., Norton, Virginia, for Appellants. Donald W. Huffman, HUFFMAN & NIXON, P.C., Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Carl G. Ely and Gilda Ely appeal the district court’s order granting Fortier Loss Control Consultants’ motion to dismiss their wrongful death action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We note that the facts relied on by the district court in reaching its conclusion were contained in the complaint. Based on those facts, it is clear that Plaintiffs’ decedent was contributorily negligent, and his negligence was the proximate cause of his fatal accident. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. SeeEly v. Fortier Loss Control Consultants, Inc. , No. CA-02-25-2 (W.D. Va. Aug. 2, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Margaret JOHNSON, Defendant/Appellant.

No. 66598.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

May 30, 1995.

Gary E. Brotherton, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Mary Moulton Bryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant pled guilty to first degree robbery, § 569.020, RSMo 1994, and armed criminal action, § 571.015, RSMo 1994. She appeals from the trial court’s order denying her motion to withdraw her guilty plea. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. Rule 30.25(b).
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

# **Subsidiaries of Registrant**

** **
| **SUBSIDIARY**                                     | ** ** | **JURISDICTION  OF INCORPORATION**   | ** ** |
|----------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------------------------|------------|
|                                               |       |                                 |       |
| Cymer B.V.                                         |       | Netherlands                          |       |
|                                               |       |                                 |       |
| Cymer Japan, Inc.                                  |       | Japan                                |       |
|                                               |       |                                 |       |
| Cymer Korea, Inc.                                  |       | Korea                                |       |
|                                               |       |                                 |       |
| Cymer Singapore Pte Ltd.                           |       | Singapore                            |       |
|                                               |       |                                 |       |
| Cymer Southeast Asia, Ltd.                         |       | Taiwan                               |       |
|                                               |       |                                 |       |
| Cymer Semiconductor Equipment (Shanghai)  Co., Ltd |       | the People’s  Republic of China |       |

 

----
2010 Executive Compensation



 Exhibit 10.1 

Executive Officer Compensation Information – 2010 Salaries 

The table below provides information regarding the annual base salaries for the Company’s executive officers for the 2010 performance period,
effective January 1, 2010: 
  

							
	 Named Executive Officer
	  	 Title
	  	2010 Base Salary	 
	 R. Scott Huennekens
	  	President and Chief Executive Officer	  	$	500,000	  
	 John T. Dahldorf
	  	Chief Financial Officer and Secretary	  	 	309,000	  
	 Joseph M. Burnett
	  	Executive Vice President and Managing Director of Japan	  	 	230,000	  
	 Michel E. Lussier
	  	Managing Director of Volcano Europe	  	 
	383,217
	(1)

	 David Sheehan
	  	President of the IVUS & FM Business Unit	  	 	309,000	  
	 Jorge J. Quinoy
	  	Executive Vice President, Global Sales	  	 	306,000	  

  

	(1)	Mr. Lussier’s salary reflects the conversion of his salary from Euros at the applicable exchange rate on February 5, 2010.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

August 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5266

David C. Poole Company:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-2860

EQI, Ltd: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3466

Academy, Ltd:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4393

Milacron:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 68 (Monday, April 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 18163]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8698]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Application of Eagle Canyon Airlines, Inc., for Certificate 
Authority

AGENCY: Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Notice of Order to Show Cause (Order 95-4-8) Docket 50073.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Transportation is directing all interested 
persons to show cause why it should not issue an order finding Eagle 
Canyon Airlines, Inc., fit, willing, and able, and awarding it a 
certificate of public convenience and necessity to engage in interstate 
scheduled air transportation of persons, property, and mail.

DATES: Persons wishing to file objections should do so no later than 
April 19, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Objections and answers to objections should be filed in 
Docket 50073 and addressed to the Documentary Services Division (C-55, 
Room PL-401), U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street 
SW., Washington, DC 20590 and should be served upon the parties listed 
in Attachment A to the order.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Carol A. Woods, Air Carrier 
Fitness Division (X-56, room 6401), U.S. Department of Transportation, 
400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366-2340.

    Dated: April 4, 1995.
Patrick V. Murphy,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs.
[FR Doc. 95-8698 Filed 4-7-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
SCPW-20-0000559

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

BERNARD HOSEA MAHUIKI, JR., Petitioner,

vs.

STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent.

 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(CASE NO. 5FFC-18-0000137)

ORDER DENYING PETITION

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, and McKenna, JJ.,

and Circuit Judge Crabtree, assigned by reason of vacancy,

with Wilson, J., concurring)

Upon consideration of petitioner Bernard Hosea

Mahuiki’s “Motion to Release Non-Violent Community Custody

Prisoner from Custody with Special Release Terms and Conditions

Amid the Coronavirus COVID-19 Bio-Terrorism Pandemic”, which was

filed as a petition on September 11, 2020, the documents attached

thereto and submitted in support thereof, and the record, it

appears that petitioner fails to demonstrate that he is entitled

to the requested extraordinary relief from this court. See Kema

v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (a writ

of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless

the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to

relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the

alleged wrong or obtain the requested action); Oili v. Chang, 54

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPW-20-0000559

30-SEP-2020

02:34 PM
Haw. 411, 412, 557 P.2d 787, 788 (1976) (“[The supreme] court

will not exercise its original jurisdiction in habeas corpus

proceedings when relief is available in a lower court and no

special reason exists for invoking its jurisdiction.”). 

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition is denied.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the

appellate court shall process the petition without payment of the

filing fee.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, September 30, 2020.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Jeffrey P. Crabtree

CONCURRENCE

(By: Wilson, J.)

For the reasons stated in my concurrence order in

Sandry v. State, SCPW-20-0000405, filed on June 24, 2020, I

concur.

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

2
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4608

II-VI Incorporated:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

“Made in China 2025” or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXHIBIT 32.1
                           ============

        Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
----------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Lam Liang
Corp. (Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dr. Anchana Chayawatana,
Chief Executive Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

   (1)  the quarterly report fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
        1934; and

   (2)  the information contained in the quarterly report fairly
        presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
        results of operations of Registrant.

                              LAM LIANG CORP., Registrant

Date:  March 14, 2005         /s/ Anchana Chayawatana
                              -----------------------------------------
                              By: Dr. Anchana Chayawatana, Chief
                                  Executive Officer













<PAGE>
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVA NIA** 

IN RE: REAPPOINTMENTS TO THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE : : : : : No. 491 CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL RULES

**ORDER**
**PER CURIA** **M AN**  **D NOW**  , this 18 th day of July, 2017, the Honorable Blaise P. Larotonda, Allegheny County, and Michael J. Machen, Esquire, Allegheny County, are hereby reappointed as members of the Criminal Procedural Rules Committee for a term of three years, co mmencing October 1, 2017.
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-113611) and
Form S-8 (No. 333-116960, No. 333-116959, No. 333-105553, No. 333-97369,
No. 333-63070, No. 333-42656, No. 333-04186 and No. 333-30111) of Conceptus, Inc. of our report dated
March 15, 2006 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule, management assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

San
Jose, California
March 16, 2006

---



QuickLinks