alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Michael D. Queen, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form




10-Q/A

of Universal Capital Management, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  March




25,

 2008



/s/ Michael D. Queen

Michael D. Queen

Principal Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5230 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5230

 To direct the Secretary of Defense to carry out a pilot program under 
 which the Secretary enters into a contract for the calculation, using 
    industry standard machine learning and artificial intelligence 
  algorithms, of the monthly rates of basic allowance for housing for 
        certain military housing areas, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 18, 2023

  Mr. Bacon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of Defense to carry out a pilot program under 
 which the Secretary enters into a contract for the calculation, using 
    industry standard machine learning and artificial intelligence 
  algorithms, of the monthly rates of basic allowance for housing for 
        certain military housing areas, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Basic Allowance for Housing 
Calculation Improvement Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING: PILOT PROGRAM TO OUTSOURCE RATE 
              CALCULATION.

    (a) In General.--Not later than September 30, 2024, the Secretary 
of Defense shall seek to enter into an agreement with a covered entity 
pursuant to which the covered entity shall calculate, using industry 
standard machine learning and artificial intelligence algorithms, the 
monthly rates of BAH for not fewer than 15 MHAs.
    (b) Report.--Not later than two years after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on 
Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a report 
containing the evaluation of the Secretary of the rates calculated by a 
covered entity pursuant to an agreement under subsection (a).
    (c) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) The term ``BAH'' means the basic allowance for housing 
        for members of the uniformed services under section 403 of 
        title 37, United States Code.
            (2) The term ``covered entity'' means a nationally 
        recognized entity in the field of single-family housing that 
        has data on local rental rates in real estate markets across 
        the United States.
            (3) The term ``MHA'' means military housing area.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.2


Exhibit 10.2 




Consent of independent registered public accounting firm 




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-114841) pertaining to the France Telecom Liquidity Plan for US Employees of Orange SA and in the Registration Statement and related Prospectus (Form F-3 No. 333-156003) of our report dated February 25, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of France Telecom and subsidiaries and our report dated February 25, 2010 on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of France Telecom and subsidiaries, included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2009.




/s/ ERNST & YOUNG Audit

Represented by Vincent de La Bachelerie

Paris-La Défense, France

May 5, 2010






2009 form 20-F / FRANCE TELECOM – E-14
#### Hosch *v.*Smith *et al.*

No. 3155.

January 20, 1923.

Money rule; intervention; from Hall.

*Hammond Johnson,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. 6-. Collins*and *W. V. Lance,*contra.

Atkinson, J.

This is a contest on a money rule, and involves competition between a mortgage *fi.*fa., based on the judgment of foreclosure of an unrecorded mortgage, and an execution based upon a judgment in attachment, the attachment having been levied after commencement of the suit to foreclose the mortgage and prior to the judgment absolute rendered in that case. Under the pleadings and the evidence no facts were involved which would entitle either party to equitable relief. The remedy is purely statutory; and the case is not of that class of which the Supreme Court has jurisdiction, but is of the Mass of which the Court of Appeals has jurisdiction. *Elmore*v. *Southern Bank & Trust Co.,*150 *Ga.*811 (105 S. E. 474).

*Transferred to Court of Appeals...*

*All the Justices concur.*
FIRST SUPPLEMENT DATED JUNE 28, 2000 TO THE

                 CONFIDENTIAL PRIVATE PLACEMENT MEMORANDUM DATED

                                  MAY 17, 2000

               MOBILE KIDNEY STONE CENTERS OF CALIFORNIA III, L.P.

                  Mobile  Kidney  Stone  Centers  of  California  III,  L.P.,  a
California  limited  partnership (the  "Partnership"),  by this First Supplement
hereby amends and supplements its Confidential  Private Placement  Memorandum of
May 17, 2000 (the  "Memorandum").  Capitalized  terms used herein are defined in
the Glossary appearing in the Memorandum. Persons who have subscribed for or are
considering  an  investment  in  the  Units  offered  by the  Memorandum  should
carefully review this First Supplement.

Extension of the Offering

                  Pursuant to the authority  given to the General Partner in the
Memorandum, the General Partner hereby elects to extend the offering termination
date to November 8, 2000 (or earlier in the  discretion of the General  Partner,
upon the sale of all Units as provided in the Memorandum).
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-5436

Robert Bosch Tool:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
PUBLIC VERSION
$[*********] [******]

$[*********]

INPUT

20.0

$[*********]

[******]

[******]

0.05

PUBLIC VERSION
Consistent with USTR's Section 301 notice, OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. requests

confidential treatment for the information designated as business confidential in this submission. Such

information consists of information that would not customarily be released to the public, including

business or trade secrets regarding production costs and processes, data on sales, product characteristics

customers, destinations, and other product, sales, and cost-related business secrets. Business confidential

information has been indicated herein by enclosing it in single brackets (“[ ]”). A public version of these

comments is also being filed with all confidential information removed.

OMRON in the US is the only designer of this product and only supplier of this component. OMRON in

the US is the only designer of this product and only supplier of this component.

AT SHIFTER SWITCH is a molded plastic switch containing an electrical switch, and is used only for

automotive purposes as a switch to change the gear into transmission up and down. It is only used for

further assembly of components which go into domestic automobile production. which is specified by the

auto manufacturer.

This product is not a target of the US Administration's 301 investigation regarding Intellectual Property

concerns. This is not a concern to IP transfer and impressment. This product contains no IP of interest

related to autonomous vehicle production.

The tariff action ultimately poses a risk of significant damage to OMRON, the domestic

automobile industry, and ultimately the US consumer as an increase in price. Like in the case of similar

approvals for vehicle components at the HTS level, OMRON views this product in the same manner.

Immediate movement of production to a US manufacturer or another country would pose significant

re-tooling costs, significant amounts of time, and approvals pertaining to consumer automobile safety

standards are costly and would take a significant amount of time to obtain.

OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. believes that CBP can easily exclude the AT SHIFTER

SWITCH in question based solely on the product description. The following are draft CBP exclusion

instructions:

"AT SHIFTER SWITCH rectangular base assembly with a "J" shaped switch housing molded to the top

running parallel to the base; circular connector at the center of the base and a rectangular connector on

the edge extending at appx 45 degree angle from the face of the base. Made of Metal, Plastic, Rubber,

One Damper - Made of rubber . Handle dimensions: 87.8 mm X 53.4mm X 24.9mm Housing

dimensions: 55.33mm X 44.29mm X30.48 mm"

This information will be contained on the invoice from the supplier

PUBLIC VERSION
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-4686

Farris Engineering:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 62 (Friday, March 31, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 16679]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7879]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Advisory Panel for Cognitive, Psychological and Language 
Sciences; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: Advisory Panel for Cognitive, Psychological and Language 
Sciences (#1758).
    Date and Time: April 19-21, 1995; 9:00 a.m.-6:00 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, Stafford Place, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Room 390, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Part-Open.
    Contact Person: Dr. Paul G. Chapin, Program Director for 
Linguistics, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, 
Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 306-1731.
    Minutes: May be obtained from the contact person listed above.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: Open session: Friday, April 21, 1995; 9:00 a.m.-12:00 
p.m.
    Closed session: April 19-20, 1995, 9:00 a.m.-6:00 p.m. and April 
21, 1995, 12:00 p.m.-6:00 p.m. To review and evaluate linguistics 
proposals as part of the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: March 27, 1995.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-7879 Filed 3-30-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 20283 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
EDGAR MIGUEL FLORES

- SOTO, also known as Edgar Miguel Flores, also known as Edgar Flores, also known as Edgar Flores Soto , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:13

- CR

- 558

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Edgar Miguel Flores

- Soto appeals his sentence following his guilty plea conviction for illega l reentry after deportation

. He raises two arguments. H e first contends that his prior conviction for aggravated robbery under Texas Penal Code § 29.03(a)(2) does not constitute a crime of violence pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2 and that the district court therefore erred in assessin g the 16

-

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances se t forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 31, 2015 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-20283 Document: 00512987892 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/31/2015No. 14

- 20283
level enhancement of § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii). He also argues that his aggravated robbery offense fails to qualify as a crime of violence under the residual “force” clause, as the offense does not require the use, attempted use, or threatened use of force against another person. See § 2L1.2 cmt. n.1(B)(iii)

. With respect to Flores

- Soto’s first argument, he claims that his prior aggravated robbery offense does not qualify as the offense of robbery, as

enu merated in § 2L1.2, because his Texas statute of conviction incorporates all Chapter 31 theft offenses under the Texas Penal Code, including theft by deception. He argues that theft by deception falls outside the generic definition of theft and that the T exas aggravated robbery statute therefore criminalizes conduct outside the generic meaning of robbery. However, a decision by this court, issued after Flores

- Soto filed his initial brief, forecloses his argument. See United States v. Rodriguez

- Salazar , 7 68 F.3d 437, 438 (5th Cir. 2014). Because theft by deception under Texas law does not deviate from the generic crime of theft, Flores

- Soto’s argument is unavailing

. Id. ; see also United States v. Hernandez

- Mejia , 588 F. App’x 376 (5th Cir. 2014). Accor dingly, the district court did not err in assessing the 16

- level enhancement of § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii). Because Flores

- Soto’s prior offense qualifies as the enumerated offense of robbery under § 2L1.2’s definition of a crime of violence, we do not address h is second argument that his prior conviction is not a crime of violence under the residual “force” clause of that definition. AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 14-20283 Document: 00512987892 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/31/2015
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 61 (Thursday, March 30, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 16516]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7756]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD

Agency Forms Submitted for OMB Review

    Summary: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Railroad Retirement Board has submitted the 
following proposal(s) for the collection of information to the Office 
of Management and Budget for review and approval.

Summary of Proposal(s)

(1) Collection title: Earnings Information Request
(2) Form(s) submitted: G-19-F
(3) OMB Number: 3220-0184
(4) Expiration date of current OMB clearance: May 31, 1995
(5) Type of request: Revision of a currently approved collection
(6) Respondents: Individuals or households
(7) Estimated annual number of respondents: 3,000
(8) Total annual responses: 3,000
(9) Total annual reporting hours: 400
(10) Collection description: Under Section 2 of the Railroad Retirement 
Act, an annuity is not payable or is reduced for any month(s) in which 
the beneficiary works for a railroad or earns more than prescribed 
amounts. The collection obtains earnings information not previously or 
erroneously reported by a beneficiary.

    Additional Information or Comments: Copies of the form and 
supporting documents can be obtained from Chuck Mierzwa, the agency 
clearance officer (312-751-3363). Comments regarding the information 
collection should be addressed to Ronald J. Hodapp, Railroad Retirement 
Board, 844 North Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611-2092 and the OMB 
reviewer, Laura Oliven (202-395-7316), Office of Management and Budget, 
Room 10230, New Executive Office Building, Washington, D.C. 20503.
Chuck Mierzwa,
Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-7756 Filed 3-29-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7905-01-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3476

Academy, Ltd:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel