alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.3

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Magal Security System Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jacob Even Ezra, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Jacob Even-Ezra *
----------------------------
Jacob Even-Ezra
Chief Executive Officer

June 27, 2003

*     The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at
      the Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon
      request.
REAFFIRMATION OF GUARANTY


 


REAFFIRMATION OF GUARANTY, dated as of June 24, 2011, made by Mark E. Seremet (the “Guarantor”) in favor of Panta Distribution, LLC (“Panta”), in respect of the Guaranty, as defined below.


 


RECITALS


 


WHEREAS, Zoo Publishing, Inc., a New Jersey corporation (the “Company”) is party to that certain Factoring and Security Agreement, dated as of September 9, 2011 (as amended, supplemented or otherwise modified, the “Factoring Agreement”), by and between the Company and Working Capital Solutions, Inc.


 


WHEREAS, pursuant to the Factoring Agreement, the Guarantor made that certain Individual Guaranty, dated as of September 9, 2011 (the “Guaranty”), in favor of Working Capital Solutions, Inc.


 


WHEREAS, pursuant to that certain Limited Recourse Assignment, dated the date hereof, by Working Capital Solutions, Inc. to Panta (the “Limited Recourse Assignment”), Working Capital Solutions, Inc. assigned the Factoring Agreement and Guaranty to Panta.


 


WHEREAS, immediately after the assignment of the Factoring Agreement and Guaranty pursuant to the Limited Recourse Assignment, the Company and Panta amended and restated the Factoring Agreement as set forth in that certain Amended and Restated Factoring, Security and Purchase Order Financing Agreement, dated as of the date hereof, by and between the Company and Panta (the “Amended and Restated Factoring Agreement”).


 


WHEREAS, the Guarantor wishes to reaffirm that the provisions of the Guaranty shall remain in full force and effect upon the effectiveness of the Amended and Restated Factoring Agreement and as otherwise provided herein;


 


WHEREAS, the Guarantor wishes to reaffirm the Guaranty in favor of Panta.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the Guarantor agrees as follows:


 


1.           The Guarantor hereby acknowledges receipt of the Amended and Restated Factoring Agreement and consents to the terms and execution thereof;


 


2.           The Guarantor hereby reaffirms all obligations to Panta pursuant to the terms of the Guaranty and acknowledges that the guarantee contained in the Guaranty is continuing and in full force and effect in favor of Panta.


 


3.           The Guarantor acknowledges that Panta may amend, restate, extend, renew or otherwise modify the Amended and Restated Factoring Agreement and any indebtedness or agreement of the Company, or enter into any agreement or extend additional or other credit accommodations, without notifying or obtaining the consent of the Guarantor and without impairing the liability of the Guarantor under the Guaranty for all of the Company’s present and future indebtedness to Panta.


 



	
GUARANTOR:


	  
	
/s/ Mark E. Seremet   


	
Mark E. Seremet, as an individual Guarantor
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5057

Scosche Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
#### Darrick BARBER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 62679.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

June 8, 1993.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 14, 1993.

Application to Transfer Denied Aug. 17, 1993.

Dave Hemingway, St. Louis, for movant, appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Joan F. Gummels, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before AHRENS, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

*445ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief. Movant pled guilty to assault in the first degree in violation of § 565.050 RSMo 1986; possession of cocaine with intent to distribute in violation of § 195.211 RSMo (Supp.1989); burglary in the second degree in violation of § 569.170 RSMo 1986; felony stealing in violation of § 570.030 RSMo 1986; and attempted trafficking in the second degree in violation of § 195.223 RSMo (Supp.1990). Movant was sentenced to concurrent terms totalling nine years.

The motion court’s findings are not clearly erroneous, and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the motion court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 Statement Pursuant to Section 906 the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
By
Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
Regarding Facts and Circumstances Relating to Exchange Act Filings Dated: March 16, 2005 I, M. Peter Thomas, Chief Executive Officer of Superconductor Technologies Inc, herby certify
that, to my knowledge, that: 1. the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Superconductor Technologies for the annual
period ended December 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Superconductor Technologies Inc. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Statement as of the date first written
above. /s/ M. Peter ThomasM. Peter Thomas
President and Chief Executive Officer
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4992

OMRON Management Center of America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-5296

ECM Industries LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 59 (Tuesday, March 28, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15932-15933]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7521]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Professional Bancorp; Notice of Application to Engage de novo in 
Permissible Nonbanking Activities

    The company listed in this notice has filed an application under 
Sec.  225.23(a)(1) of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.23(a)(1)) 
for the Board's approval under section 4(c)(8) of the Bank Holding 
Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843(c)(8)) and Sec.  225.21(a) of Regulation Y 
(12 CFR 225.21(a)) to commence or to engage de novo, either directly or 
through a subsidiary, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in Sec.  
225.25 of Regulation Y as closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, such activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    The application is available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. Once the application has been accepted 
for processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing on the question whether consummation of the proposal can 
``reasonably be expected to produce benefits to the public, such as 
greater convenience, increased competition, or gains in efficiency, 
that outweigh possible adverse effects, such as undue concentration of 
resources, decreased or unfair competition, conflicts of interests, or 
unsound banking practices.'' Any request for a hearing on this question 
must be accompanied by a statement of the reasons a written 
presentation would not suffice in lieu of a hearing, identifying 
specifically any questions of fact that are in dispute, summarizing the 
evidence that would be presented at a hearing, and indicating how the 
party commenting would be aggrieved by approval of the proposal.
    Comments regarding the application must be received at the Reserve 
Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than 
April 11, 1995.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Kenneth R. Binning, 
Director, Bank Holding Company) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, 
California 94105:
    1. Professional Bancorp, Santa Monica, California; to engage de 
novo in making and servicing of loans, pursuant [[Page 15933]] to Sec.  
225.25(b)(1) of the Board's Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 22, 
1995.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-7521 Filed 3-27-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 64 (Tuesday, April 4, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17063-17064]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8155]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

John Bigham Barnett, III; Change in Bank Control Notice; 
Acquisition of Shares of Banks or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificant listed below has applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on notices are set forth in 
paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notice is available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. Once the notice has been 
[[Page 17064]] accepted for processing, it will also be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
the notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than April 18, 1995.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Zane R. Kelley, Vice President) 
104 Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303:
    1. John Bigham Barnett, III, Monroeville, Alabama; to retain 14 
percent of the voting shares of First Monco Bancshares, Inc., 
Monroeville, Alabama, and thereby indirectly acquire The Monroe County 
Bank, Monroeville, Alabama.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 29, 
1995.
William W. Wiles,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-8155 Filed 4-3-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
EXHIBIT 32.1

Statement Pursuant to Section 906 the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

By

Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer

Regarding Facts and Circumstances Relating to Exchange Act Filings

Dated:
March 8, 2013

I, Jeffrey A. Quiram, Chief Executive Officer of Superconductor Technologies Inc, herby certify, to my
knowledge, that:

1. the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Superconductor Technologies for the annual period ended
December 31, 2012 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of Superconductor Technologies Inc.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Statement as of the date first
written above.



/s/ Jeffrey A. QuiramJeffrey A. Quiram President
and Chief Executive Officer
DISMISS and Opinion Filed April 8, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-19-00420-CV

THE ESTATE OF MAYBELLENE ANDERSON, DECEASED

On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. PR-16-01315-2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Schenck, Molberg, and Nowell

Opinion by Justice Schenck

Before the Court is appellants’ motion asking that we withdraw their notices 

of appeal. Appellants inform the Court that they no longer desire to pursue this 

appeal. We construe the motion as a motion to dismiss the appeal. We grant the 

motion and dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). 

190420F.P05

/David J. Schenck/

DAVID J. SCHENCK

JUSTICE
–2–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

THE ESTATE OF MAYBELLENE 

ANDERSON, DECEASED

No. 05-19-00420-CV 

On Appeal from the Probate Court 

No. 2, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 

PR-16-01315-2.

Opinion delivered by Justice Schenck. 

Justices Molberg and Nowell 

participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is 

DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee U.S. Bank National Association as Legal 

Title Trustee for Truman 2016 SC6 Title Trust recover its costs of this appeal from 

appellants Jackquelyn Strickland, Erika Johnson, and Carlester Harper.

Judgment entered this 8th day of April, 2020.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5288

Arrowhead Electrical Products, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
EXHIBIT 4.27







TRANSLATION FROM HEBREW









State of Israel


Ministry of Industry, Trade, and Employment


Industrial Research and Development Administration


Office of the Chief Scientist


Technological Incubator Administration







Tel Aviv, Jan. 2, 2011







Leah Klapper


BioLine Innovations, Ltd.


POB 45158


91450 Jerusalem







Fax: (02) 5489101







Dear Sir or Madam:


 


Re: Meeting No. 2010/3, December 30, 2010 (file 35583)


 


I hereby inform you that the Biotechnology Incubators Committee considered your request and decided as follows:


 


Background: The BioLine incubator is specific for biotechnology. Its franchise began in January 2005 and ends in December 2010.


 


Pursuant to the agreement for operation of the incubator, signed by the State and the BioLine Incubator, BioLine is entitled to file a request to extend the term of the agreement for an additional three years.


 


The BioLine Incubator filed a request to extend the term of the agreement for an additional three years, beginning in January 2011 and running through the end of December 2013.


 


Decision: To approve the extension of the term of the agreement for two years, beginning in January 2011 and running through the end of December 2012.


 


The BioLine Incubator will be entitled to submit a request for another extension of the agreement, for an additional year (until the end of December 2013), on condition that the request is submitted not before January 2012 and not after June 2012.


 


Sincerely,


 


/s/ Yossi Smolar


 


Yossi Smolar


 


Director, Biotechnology Incubators Program




 


cc: Ora Dar, professional investigator
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-5455

Bosch Automotive Service Solutions Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel