alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**
 
 **CERTIFICATION**
 
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Industrial Enterprises of America, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 (the "Form 10-QSB") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-QSB.
 
 
 
 Dated: December 30 , 2004
 
 /s/ John D. Mazzuto
 John D. Mazzuto, Chief Financial
 Officer, Vice Chairman of the Board and Assistant
 Secretary
 
 
 
 The foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-97772) pertaining to the 1994 Incentive Stock Option and
Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan of InfoMed Holdings, Inc. of our report dated
March 21, 1997, except for Note 16 as to which the date is March 26, 1997, with
respect to the financial statements of Simione Central Holdings, Inc. included
in the Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended December 31, 1996.
 
                                          ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
Atlanta, Georgia
May 29, 1997
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4333

SPM Flow Control, Inc. DBA Weir SPM:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5795

Tianhai Electric North America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report, or the Report, of Universal Truckload Services, Inc., or the Company, on Form 10-Q for the period
ended July3, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Donald B. Cochran, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Robert E. Sigler, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, respectively, that (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                                                                 
|--------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 11, 2010 |  |                                                                 
|                      | 
|                      |  | /s/ Donald B. Cochran                                           
|                      |  | Donald B. Cochran                                               
|                      |  | President and Chief Executive Officer                           
|                      | 
|                      |  | /s/ Robert E. Sigler                                            
|                      |  | Robert E. Sigler                                                
|                      |  | Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6853

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CALVIN SCOTT WEDINGTON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (CR82-86; CA-04-783-RDB)

Submitted: September 16, 2004 Decided: September 22, 2004

Before LUTTIG, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Calvin Scott Wedington, Appellant Pro Se. Maury S. Epner, MILLER,

MILLER & CANBY, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Calvin Scott Wedington seeks to appeal the district

court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion as

successive. An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a

§ 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by

a district court absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner

satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists

would find both that his constitutional claims are debatable and

that any dispositive procedural rulings are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack

v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676,

683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and

conclude that Wedington has not made the requisite showing. To the

extent that Wedington’s informal brief and notice of appeal could

be construed as a motion for authorization to file a successive

§ 2255 motion, we deny such authorization. See United States v.

Winestock, 340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 124 S. Ct.

496 (2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5141

Radio Systems Corp:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_5-30-2019.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

September 10, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00457

- CV

IN RE E.K.C.,

Fro m the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012

- PA

- 02397

Honorable Richard Garcia, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellant ’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief has this date been received

and filed in the above styled and numbered cause. Extension of time to file the Appellant’s brief

is this date GRANTED. Time is extended to September 2 0, 2015.



### PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

____________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

CLERK OF COURT

cc: Kevin Terrill

Bexar County Dis trict Attorney's Office Shawn Darrick Sheffield

Law Office of Shawn Sheffield
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6035

Apergy ESP Systems, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3612

Scosche Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM EASTERN AMERICAN NATURAL GAS TRUST'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 INCLUDED IN ITS REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUILIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           1,511
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,795,254
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,796,765
<PP&E>                                      93,162,180
<DEPRECIATION>                              23,145,237
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              72,813,708
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,796,765
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  70,016,943
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                72,813,708
<SALES>                                     12,103,139
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,103,139
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,280,816
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               441,619
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             10,387,436
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         10,387,436
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                10,387,436
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.76



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 62 (Friday, March 31, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 16680]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7875]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Advisory Panel Meeting for Genetics and Nucleic Acids; Notice of 
Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Advisory Panel for Genetics & Nucleic Acids (<SUP>#1149).
    Date and Time: Wednesday April 19, thru Friday April 21, 1995, 
at 8:30 am to 5:00 pm.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., 
Arlington, VA, Room 370.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: DeLill Nassar Program Director for Eukaryotic 
Genetics, Division of Molecular and Cellular Biosciences, Room 655, 
National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. 
Telephone: (703) 306-1439.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate proposals submitted to the 
Eukaryotic Genetics Program in the Division of Molecular & Cellular 
Biosciences at NSF as part of the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information, financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: March 27, 1995.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-7875 Filed 3-30-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Michael D. Queen, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Universal Capital Management, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  March 14, 2013



/s/ Michael D. Queen

Michael D. Queen

Principal Financial Officer
ex10_5.htm








Exhibit 10.5













April 8, 2010












DirecTV, Inc.


2230 East Imperial Highway


El Segundo, CA  90245


Attention:  Toby Berlin







Dear Toby:







Reference is made to that certain Amended And Restated Affiliation And License Agreement For DTH Satellite Exhibition Of Programming between DirecTV, Inc. ("Affiliate") and Playboy Entertainment Group and Spice Hot Entertainment, Inc. ("Programmer") made as of August 1, 2007 as extended by the Letter Agreements dated October 12, 2009, November 13, 2009, December 14, 2009, January 14, 2010, February 12, 2010, and March 11, 2010 (the "Agreement").







Except as modified expressly below, all terms of the Agreement are hereby ratified and remain in full force and effect.  All capitalized terms used herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them as set forth in the Agreement.








	  	
Affiliate and Programmer hereby agree to extend the Term of the Agreement as set forth in Paragraph 6.(a) through the earlier of the parties entering into a replacement agreement or July 14, 2010.







 


Very truly yours,








	
PLAYBOY ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC.

	  	
SPICE HOT ENTERTAINMENT, INC.


	  	  	  	  	  
	  	  	  	  	  
	
/s/ Roy Liebrecht

	  	
/s/ Roy Liebrecht


	
By:

	
Roy J. Liebrecht

	  	
By:

	
Roy J. Liebrecht


	
Title:

	
Vice President

	  	
Title:

	
Vice President


	  	
Business & Legal Affairs

	  	  	
Business & Legal Affairs







 



	  	
ACCEPTED AND AGREED:







 



	  	
DIRECTV, INC.







 


 




	  	
By:

	
/s/ Toby Berlin

	  	  
	  	
Title:  

	
Vice President

	  	  
	  	  	
Programming Acquisitions

	  	
MSO #7975