alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5974

Barksdale, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
PUBLIC VERSION
$[*********] [******]

$[*********]

INPUT

20.0

$[*********]

[******]

[******]

0.05

PUBLIC VERSION
Consistent with USTR's Section 301 notice, OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. requests

confidential treatment for the information designated as business confidential in this submission. Such

information consists of information that would not customarily be released to the public, including

business or trade secrets regarding production costs and processes, data on sales, product characteristics

customers, destinations, and other product, sales, and cost-related business secrets. Business confidential

information has been indicated herein by enclosing it in single brackets (“[ ]”). A public version of these

comments is also being filed with all confidential information removed.

OMRON in the US is the only designer of this product and only supplier of this component.

INSTRUMENT PANEL SWITCH is a molded plastic switch containing

electrical switches, and is used only for automotive purposes as a switch to move actuate traction control

or fuel economy settings. It is only used for further assembly of components which go into domestic

automobile production. which is specified by auto manufacturer.

This product is not a target of the US Administration's 301 investigation regarding Intellectual Property

concerns. This is not a concern to IP transfer and impressment. This product contains no IP of interest

related to autonomous vehicle production.

The tariff action ultimately poses a risk of significant damage to OMRON, the domestic

automobile industry, and ultimately the US consumer as a

increase in price. Like in the case of similar approvals for vehicle components at the HTS

level, OMRON views this product in the same manner. Immediate movement of production to a US

manufacturer or another country would pose significant re-tooling costs, significant

amounts of time, and approvals pertaining to consumer automobile safety standards are costly and would

take a significant amount of time to obtain.

OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. believes that CBP can easily exclude the INSTRUMENT

PANEL SWITCH in question based solely on the product description. The following are draft CBP

exclusion instructions:

"INSTRUMENT PANEL SWITCH rectangular molding with eight connecting snaps protruding at 90

degrees from the switch plane along the lengthier end of the molding; with four switch actuators laid out

lengthwise along the rectangular length; one button reads "econ", another has a triangular "hazard"

symbol, and the last one (from left to right) has a symbol of a car with a tir swerve and the word "off"

below it. "Plastic case assembly; Consist of 4 plastic knob and 1 plastic case - made of plastic resin;"

"Case: 136mm x 13.45 mm x 32 mm Knob (HZRD): 17.06 m x11.16 mm x18 mm Knob (INVERTER):

31.27mm x 13.98 mm x 20.5 mm Knob (ESP): 16.95 mm x13.94 mm x20.5 mm Knob (ECO): 31.26 mm

x13.94 mm x20.5 mm""

This information will be contained on the invoice from the supplier

PUBLIC VERSION
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

August 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4777

David C. Poole Company:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
---

EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18
U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Report of SOLAR ENERTECH CORP. (the
Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report"), I, Leo Shi
Young, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|Date: May 18, 2007 | By:
      /s/ Leo Shi Young                    
|------------------ | -----------------------------------------------
|                   |                                                
|                   | Leo Shi Young                                  
|                   | President and CEO - Principal Executive Officer



---
SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

TERRENCE GERRARD FORD, 

Appellant, 

No. 69603 

VS. 

JAMES COX, FILED 

Respondent. 

JUL 1 2 2016 

TRACIE K. LINDEMAN 

CLERK OF UPREME COURT 

BY 5' 

DEPUTY CLERK 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 

Cause appearing, appellant's motion for a voluntary dismissal 

of this appeal is granted. This appeal is dismissed. NRAP 42(b). 

It is so ORDERED. 

/ _Littaitst 

Hardesty 

Saitta 

Pickering 

cc: Hon. James Todd Russell, District Judge 

Terrence Gerrard Ford 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Carson City District Attorney 

Carson City Clerk 

(0) 1947A IL- 2/728
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Michael D. Queen, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Universal Capital Management, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  March 22, 2011



/s/ Michael D. Queen

Michael D. Queen,

Principal Executive Officer
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2150

Reelcraft Industries:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
Exhibit 10.12

 

Consulting Contract

 

The following is agreed upon

 

between

 

CityDeal Europe GmbH

-  hereinafter called the “Company” -

 

and

 

Mr. Oliver Samwer

- hereinafter called the “Consultant” -

 

§ 1 Scope

 

(1)           The Consultant shall advise the Company and its subsidiaries regarding all goals and shall work for these, which these companies pursue according to their business objective.

 

(2)           The Consultant is free to determine his place of work and his work hours.  The Consultant undertakes to spend the predominant part of his work hours (at least 50%) on behalf of the Company.

 

(3)           The Consultant is not liable for damages in the fulfillment of his tasks, as long as he did not cause these deliberately or through gross negligence.

 

§ 2 Non-remuneration

 

(1)           The Consultant furnishes the advisory activities free of charge — based on his direct or indirect participation as a shareholder.

 

1











 

§ 3 Reimbursement for Expenditures

 

(1)           The Company shall reimburse the Consultant for necessary and documented expenditures for travel, telephone and postage, incurred in performing his tasks in the context of the present Contract.

 

(2)          The necessity of larger expenditures must be agreed upon with the Company before they are advanced.

 

(3)          The Consultant shall account for his expenditures on a monthly basis.

 

§ 4 Term of the Contract

 

(1)          The Consultant shall start his advisory activities on 04/01/2010.

 

(2)          This Consulting Contract shall end 18 months after this agreement is signed, without this requiring any notice.

 

§ 5 Duty of Loyalty

 

The Consultant undertakes to maintain confidentiality during and after the end of the contractual relationship concerning all business and operating secrets of which he becomes aware in the course of his activities on behalf of the Company.

 

§ 6 Safekeeping and Return of Documents

 

(1)          The Consultant undertakes to properly preserve all documents made available to him, as well as all documents or other records he has prepared, including concepts, which are in his possession and which concern the affairs of the Company, and in particular to ensure that third parties cannot gain access thereto.

 

(2)           Documents and records per Para. 1 shall be returned to the Company upon request during the duration of the contractual relationship and immediately, without request, after the end of the contractual relationship.

 

2











 

§ 7 Miscellaneous

 

	
Changes and/or   additions to the present Contract must be in writing.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Berlin, 05/12/2010
    	
 
    
	
Place, date
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/ Amt Jeschke
    	
 
    
	
CityDeal Europe   GmbH, represented by its managing director Arnt Jeschke
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Place, date
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/ Oliver Samwer
    	
 
    
	
Mr. Oliver Samwer
    	
 
    


 

3
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5249

United Scope LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_05.09.19.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4123

Scosche Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

PR 06-0544 

IN RE PETITION OF MICHAEL P. SINKS FOR 

REINSTATEMENT TO ACTIVE STATUS IN THE 

BAR OF MONTANA 

ORDER 

Michael P. Sinks has petitioned for reinstatement to active status in the State Bar of 

Montana. Sinks was placed on inactive status by the State Bar of Montana pursuant to 

Rules 3B2, 7, and 13 of the Rules for Continuing Legal Education (CLE) on July 2, 2024, 

as a result of noncompliance with CLE requirements. In accordance with Rule 13 of the 

CLE Rules, Sinks has provided a letter from the State Bar certifying that Sinks has now 

completed all CLE requirements "through the reporting year that ended March 31, 2024." 

The Petition indicates Sinks is or has not been: 1) suspended, disbarred, or otherwise 

ineligible to practice of law in another jurisdiction and is not currently subject to 

disciplinary proceedings or pending disciplinary proceedings in another jurisdiction, 

2) charged with a criminal offense, 3) accrued delinquent debt or filed for bankruptcy, 

4) failed to fulfill the obligations of a public office or professional license, or 5) committed 

any violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct while on inactive status. Good cause 

appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Michael P. Sinks for reinstatement 

to active status in the State Bar of Montana is GRANTED. 

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to the Petitioner and the State 

Bar of Montana. 

DATED this oge lday of July, 2024. 

FILED 

JUL 2 3 2024 

Bowen Greenwooci 

Clerk of Suprerne Coun 

State of Moritan 

07/23/2024

Case Number: PR 06-0544
7 - oft 4-_. 

at' L#5' 

e, 

al 7c.

.4„.

2
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

_________________

NO. 09-15-00305-CV

_________________

IN RE GERALD B. WILSON

________________________________________________________________________

Original Proceeding

435th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 07-02-02127-CV

________________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Gerald B. Wilson filed a petition for a writ of mandamus compelling the 

District Clerk of Montgomery County, Texas, to forward Wilson’s pro se 

application for a writ of habeas corpus to this Court. It appears that Wilson filed 

the application in a trial court civil case where he may have counsel of record. 

Other than to protect the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals, this Court’s 

mandamus jurisdiction does not extend to a district clerk. See Tex. Gov’t Code 

Ann. § 22.221 (West 2004). The mandamus petition suggests that this Court has 
2

original habeas jurisdiction. See generally id. § 22.221(d).1 Our jurisdiction is 

invoked by filing an original petition with the appellate court, not the district court. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 52.1. Relator has not shown that the District Clerk has a 

ministerial duty to forward his application to the Court of Appeals. See id.; 

compare with Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07, § 3 (West 2015). 

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. 

PETITION DENIED. 

PER CURIAM

Submitted on August 26, 2015

Opinion Delivered August 27, 2015

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.

 1

Relator has not provided this Court with a copy of his application for a writ 

of habeas corpus, and we do not decide here whether he might have a cognizable 

claim.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4828

Enerpac:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel