alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2201

General Tools:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of TechLite, Inc. (the
"Company")  on  Form  10-QSB  for  the  period  ended  September  30,  2003 (the
"Report"),  I,  J.D.  Arvidson,  Chief  Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify  that  to  my  knowledge:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.  78m or  78o(d)); and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  November  12,  2003

                                        /s/  J.D.  Arvidson
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        J.D.  Arvidson
                                        Chairman  and  Chief  Executive  Officer


     The  above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350) and is not being filed as part of
the  Form  10-QSB  or  as  a  separate  disclosure  document.











                                                                      Exhibit 32
                                                                Page 1 of 1 Page
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4720

Scosche Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Exhibit 10.7
 Spectrum Group International, Inc.
Employee Restricted Stock Grant Agreement
     Grant of Restricted Stock
 Grant Date
 Incorporation of Plan
 Vesting
 Number of shares of RestrictedVesting Date
    
    Stock vesting on such date[DATE]
    
    [NUMBER OF SHARES]




---



##### 



Restrictions on Transferability of Unvested Shares
 Termination of Service
 Issuance of Certificates
    2




---



##### 



Representations, Warranties and Covenants of the Participant
 Exhibit A
 Exhibit A
 3




---



##### 



Securities Legend; Transfers
  4




---



##### 



Dividends, etc
 Delays or Omissions
 Right of Discharge Preserved
 Integration
 5




---



##### 



Counterparts
 Governing Law
 Obligation to Notify
 Participant Acknowledgment
  SPECTRUM GROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC.By:Name:Title:[EMPLOYEE]
 6




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A
 Spectrum Group International, Inc.
 FOR U.S. RESIDENTS ONLY
 Accredited Investor Status
      Signature:Print Name:Date:
 7




---



##### 



FOR NON-U.S. RESIDENTS ONLY
   Signature:Print Name:Date:
 8
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4288 

To allow manufacturers and sponsors of a drug to use alternative testing 

methods to animal testing to investigate the safety and effectiveness 

of a biological product. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 19 (legislative day, MAY 17), 2022 

Mr. LUJA ́N introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To allow manufacturers and sponsors of a drug to use alternative testing methods to animal testing to investigate 

the safety and effectiveness of a biological product. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reducing Animal Test5 ing Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. NEW APPROACH METHODOLOGIES. 

7 Item (bb) of section 351(k)(2)(A)(i)(I) of the Public 

8 Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262(k)(2)(A)(i)(I)) is 

9 amended to read as follows: 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4288 IS

1 ‘‘(bb) an assessment of tox2 icity (which may rely on, or con3 sist of, a study or studies de4 scribed in item (aa) or (cc)); 

5 and’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 57 (Friday, March 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15580]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7276]



[[Page 15580]]


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

[MT-940-05-4730-02]


Land Resource Management

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Montana State Office, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The plats of survey of the following described land are 
scheduled to be officially filed in the Montana State Office, Billings, 
Montana, thirty (30) days from the date of this publication.

Fifth Principal Meridian, North Dakota

T. 145 N., R. 102 W.

    The plat representing the dependent resurvey of a portion of the 
subdivisional lines and the adjusted original meanders of the former 
right and left banks of the Little Missouri River, and the subdivision 
of section 26 and the survey of the meanders of the present right and 
left banks and certain median lines of the Little Missouri River and 
certain division of accretion lines, in Township 145 North, Range 102 
West, Fifth Principal Meridian, North Dakota, was accepted February 9, 
1995.

T. 146 N., R. 102 W.

    The plat, in two sheets, representing the dependent resurvey of a 
portion of the subdivisional lines and the adjusted original meanders 
of the former right bank of the Little Missouri River, and the 
subdivision of section 26 and the survey of the meanders of the present 
right and left banks and certain median lines of the Little Missouri 
River and certain division of accretion lines in Township 146 North, 
Range 102 West, Fifth Principal Meridian, North Dakota was accepted 
February 9, 1995.
    The above-mentioned surveys were executed at the request of Conoco 
Inc. and Meridian Oil Inc. to fix division of accretion lines and to 
apportion the bed of the Little Missouri River.
    The triplicate original of the preceding described plats will be 
immediately placed in the open files and will be available to the 
public as a matter of information.
    If a protest against these surveys, as shown on these plats, is 
received prior to the date of the official filings, the filings will be 
stayed pending consideration of the protest. These particular plats 
will not be officially filed until the day after all protests have been 
accepted or dismissed and become final, or appeals from the dismissal 
affirmed.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, 222 North 
32nd Street, P.O. Box 36800, Billings, Montana 59107-6800.

    Dated: March 15, 1995.
Larry E. Hamilton,
State Director.
[FR Doc. 95-7276 Filed 3-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-DN-P
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5143 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5143

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide authority to add 
          additional vaccines to the list of taxable vaccines.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 4, 2023

 Mr. Doggett (for himself, Mr. Kelly of Pennsylvania, Ms. Sewell, Mr. 
Smucker, Mr. Blumenauer, and Mr. Larson of Connecticut) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide authority to add 
          additional vaccines to the list of taxable vaccines.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Vaccine Access Improvement Act of 
2023''.

SEC. 2. ADDITION OF NEW VACCINES TO LIST OF TAXABLE VACCINES.

    (a) In General.--Section 4132(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(Q) Any vaccine which is not described in any 
                other subparagraph of this paragraph and which is 
                included on the Vaccine Injury Table under section 2114 
                of the Public Health Service Act.''.
    (b) Notification.--Not later than 30 days after the Secretary of 
Health and Human Services adds a vaccine to the Vaccine Injury Table 
pursuant of section 2114 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 
300aa-14), the Secretary shall notify the Secretary of the Treasury, 
the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of the Senate, 
the Committee on Finance of the Senate, the Committee on Energy and 
Commerce of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Ways and 
Means of the House of Representatives of such designation.
    (c) Effective Date.--
            (1) Sales, etc.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
        apply to sales and uses on or after the date on which the 
        Secretary of Health and Human Services lists any new vaccine 
        pursuant to section 2114 of the Public Health Service Act (42 
        U.S.C. 300aa-14) for purposes of compensation for any vaccine-
        related injury or death through the Vaccine Injury Compensation 
        Trust Fund.
            (2) Deliveries.--For purposes of paragraph (1) and section 
        4131 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, in the case of sales 
        on or before the effective date described in such paragraph for 
        which delivery is made after such date, the delivery date shall 
        be considered the sale date.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          18,072
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   63,742
<ALLOWANCES>                                    17,063
<INVENTORY>                                     94,887
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               215,646
<PP&E>                                         485,828
<DEPRECIATION>                                 217,826
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 555,571
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          139,534
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           133
<OTHER-SE>                                      50,044
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   555,571
<SALES>                                        710,246
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               710,246
<CGS>                                          618,156
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  618,156
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,575
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   805
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              33,182
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (13,187)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (5,662)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,525)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (8,528)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (16,053)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.21)
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of John R. Beaudoin, as Commissioner of Social Services of the County of Rensselaer, on Behalf of Susan GG., Respondent, v William HH., Appellant.

Appeals (1) from an order of the Family Court of Rensselaer County (Perkinson, J.), entered August 2, 1988, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 5, to adjudicate respondent as the father of Susan GG.’s child, and (2) from an order of said court, entered June 19, 1989, which denied respondent’s objection to the Hearing Examiner’s order of support for said child.

Appeal from order entered August 2, 1988 dismissed, without costs.

Appeal from order entered June 19, 1989, affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Levine, JJ., concur.
1 Quinnan v. American Hosp. Supply Corp. , No. 85-195-II , 1985 WL 4076 (Tenn. App.

29 Oct. 1985).

2 Winkler v. Fleetline Prods., Inc. , 859 S.W.2d 340 (Tenn. App. 1993).



# FILED October 3, 199 7 Cecil W. Crowson Ap pellate Cou rt Clerk 

### IN THE COURT O F APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

MIDDL E SE CTI ON AT NASHV ILLE, TENNESSEE The Outdoo r Source, Inc., ) Plaintiff /Appella nt, ) Appeal N o.

) 01-A-01- 9702- CH- 00053 v. ) ) Chancer

y Cour t No. Outdoor Ent ertainment, Inc., ) 95-2732-I Defendant/Appellee. ) 

### ORDER This court ente

red an order on 13 August 1997 in the above styled case. Defendant/appellee, Outdoor Entertainment, Inc. (“OEI ”), fil ed a petiti on for reheari ng on 25 August 1 997. It is the opinion of this court that the petitio n should be denied. OEI arg ues the par

ties wer e not hear

d on the issue

of whethe

r the contrac t contained an unequivoca l provision. To the con trar y, plaint iff/appe llant, T

he Outdoor Source, Inc. (“

TOSI” ), rais ed this issue

in its initia

l brief. OEI ha

d the opportu ni ty to respond in

its brief and during oral argum

ent. OEI also argue s our conclusion that se ction 11(a) constitute d an u nlawf ul forfeiture and our re liance on Quinnan 1 are contradictory . Speci fically , OEI states:

“ Quinnan held that parties may agree that no comm issions will be paid after a sales perso n’s emplo ym

ent is terminated, so long as such agreement i s ‘unequiv ocal.’ Howeve r, the C ourt ’s holding that this contract - even if unequivocal - would work aforfeit ure again st TOSI

is inconsisten

t with Quinnan and Winkler . 2 ” This co urt did not hold that an unequivocal agreement would have operated as a forfeiture. Instead, this court dec ided based o n our earl ier conclusion that the Agreem ent did not c ontain an unequivoca

l expr ession th at OEI ’s inter pretation of section

11(a) con stituted a forfeiture. Despite OEI’ s assertio ns to the contra ry, this court d

id not addre ss thei ssue of whether there would have been a forfeiture if section 11(a) unequivocall y

denied TO SI post-te

rmina tion com missio ns. We have considere d all rem

aining argu ments raised by OEI an d find them

to be without meri t. Therefore, it follow s that the petition for rehe aring is hereby denied. C osts of this petition are taxed against petitioner/appellee, Outdoor Entertainment, Inc. Enter thi s the ____ day

of Septem

ber 1997.

_________________

_____________ HENRY F. TODD, PRESIDING JUDGE, MIDDLE SECTION

_________________

_____________ SAMUEL L. LEWIS, JUDGE

_________________

_____________ BEN H. CANTRELL, JUDGE
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION BY THE PRINCIPALFINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Visant Holding Corp. andVisant Corporation (collectively, the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the periodended July 2, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul B. Carousso, principal financial officer ofthe Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of myknowledge:

 

(1)          The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: August 16, 2005 | /s/ Paul B. Carousso           |
|-----------------------|--------------------------------|
|                  | Paul B. Carousso               |
|                  | ***Vice  President, Finance*** |

 

 

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not except to the extent required bythe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and thiscertification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into anyfiling under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act,except to the extent the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.

 

----
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Peter RALLS, Appellant. Peter RALLS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. WD 50234, WD 51591.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

June 18, 1996.

Rebecca L. Kurz, Asst. Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Attorney General, Kansas City, for respondent.

*51Before EDWIN H. SMITH, P.J., and BRECKENRIDGE and ELLIS, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Consolidated appeals from conviction, following a jury trial, of trafficking in the second degree, § 195.223, RSMo 1994, and the denial, after evidentiary hearing, of Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief.

The conviction and the order denying the Rule 29.15 motion are affirmed, but the judgment is remanded to the trial court to enter an order *nunc pro tunc*finding appellant to be a “persistent offender.”

Judgments affirmed. Rules 84.16(b) and 30.25(b).
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4920

Enerpac:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
#### CITIZENS STATE BANK, Plaintiff/Respondent v. Richard L. HARDEN and Janice E. Harden, d/b/a Harden Welding & Mfg., Defendants/Appellants.

No. WD 39680.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

June 20, 1989.

Richard L. Harden and Janice E. Harden, Lineville, Iowa, pro se.

James G. Spencer, Phillips & Spencer, Milan, for plaintiff/respondent.

Before TURNAGE, P.J., and CLARK and FENNER, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from registration of foreign judgment. Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).