Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 66 / Thursday, April 6, 1995 / Notices 17525

SDG&E requests that the Commission

allow the Agreement to become effective

on the 15th day of May, 1995 or at the

earliest possible date.

Copies of this filing were served upon

the Public Utilities Commission of the

State of California and PXC.

Comment date: April 10, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

6. Portland General Electric Company

[Docket No. ER95–734–000]

Take notice that on March 13, 1995,

Portland General Electric Company

(PGE), tendered for filing revisions to

PGE’s FERC Electric Tariff, Original

Volume No. 2 (PGE–2), and twentythree (23) new unsigned Service

Agreements under PGE–2 with:

City of Azusa Light & Water Department

AES Power Inc.

Arizona Power Pooling Association

Ashton Energy Corporation

CRSS Power Marketing, Inc.

Eclipse Energy, Inc.

El Paso Electric Company

Engelhard Power Marketing, Inc.

Equitable Power Services Co.

Gulfstream Energy, LLC

Heartland Energy Services, Inc.

Howell Power Systems, Inc.

Imperial Irrigation District

InterCoast Power Marketing Co.

National Electric Associates

Nevada Power Company

NorAm Energy Services, Inc.

Plains Electric Generation &

Transmission Cooperative, Inc.

Public Service Company of Colorado

Public Service Company of New Mexico

Rainbow Energy Marketing Corporation

Tucson Electric Power Co.

Vesta Energy Alternatives Co.

Pursuant to 18 CFR 35.11, and the

Commission’s Order in Central Hudson

Gas & Electric Corp., et al., 60 FERC

¶ 61,106, reh’g denied, 61 FERC

¶ 61,089 (1992), PGE has requested that

the Commission grant a waiver of the

notice requirements of 18 CFR 35.3 to

allow the revised tariff, PGE–2, to

become effective March 13, 1995.

Copies of the filing have been served

on the parties included in the Certificate

of Service attached to the filing letter.

Comment date: April 10, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

7. New York State Electric & Gas

Corporation

[Docket No. ER95–738–000]

Take notice that on March 14, 1995,

New York State Electric & Gas

Corporation (NYSEG), tendered for

filing pursuant to § 35.12 of the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission’s Rules

of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR

35.12, as an initial rate schedule, an

agreement with Electric Clearinghouse,

Inc. (ECI). The agreement provides a

mechanism pursuant to which the

parties can enter into separately

scheduled transactions under which

NYSEG will sell to ECI and ECI will

purchase from NYSEG either capacity

and associated energy or energy only as

the parties may mutually agree.

NYSEG requests that the agreement

become effective March 15, 1995, so that

the parties may, if mutually agreeable,

enter into separately scheduled

transactions under the agreement.

NYSEG has requested waiver of the

notice requirements for good cause

shown.

NYSEG served copies of the filing

upon the New York State Public Service

Commission and ECI.

Comment date: April 10, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

8. New York State Electric & Gas

Corporation

[Docket No. ER95–739–000]

Take notice that on March 14, 1995,

New York State Electric & Gas

Corporation (NYSEG), tendered for

filing pursuant to § 35.12 of the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission’s Rules

of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR

35.12, as an initial rate schedule, an

agreement with Burlington Electric

Department (BED). The agreement

provides a mechanism pursuant to

which the parties can enter into

separately scheduled transactions under

which NYSEG will sell to BED and BED

will purchase from NYSEG either

capacity and associated energy or

energy only as the parties may mutually

agree.

NYSEG requests that the agreement

become effective on March 15, 1995, so

that the parties may, if mutually

agreeable, enter into separately

scheduled transactions under the

agreement. NYSEG has requested waiver

of the notice requirements for good

cause shown.

NYSEG served copies of the filing

upon the New York State Public Service

Commission and BED.

Comment date: April 10, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

9. Maine Yankee Atomic Power

Company

[Docket No. ER95–747–000]

Take notice that Maine Yankee

Atomic Power Company, on March 15,

1995 tendered for filing a limited

Section 205 filing solely for approval of

earnings on Construction Work In

Progress balances for the year 1994 that

were included in rates subject to refund.

Total earnings on CWIP for 1994 were

$239,750 or 0.14 percent of total

billings. The represents a decrease of

$240,901 from the 1993 CWIP billings of

$480,651.000.

Copies of the limited Section 205

filing were served upon Maine Yankee’s

jurisdictional customers, secondary

customers, and Massachusetts

Department of Public Utilities, Vermont

Public Service Board, Connecticut

Public Utilities Control Authority,

Maine Public Utilities Commission,

New Hampshire Public Utilities

Commission and Office of the Public

Advocate, State of Maine.

Comment date: April 10, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs

E. Any person desiring to be heard or

to protest said filing should file a

motion to intervene or protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street, NE.,

Washington, DC 20426, in accordance

with Rules 211 and 214 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR

385.214). All such motions or protests

should be filed on or before the

comment date. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–8432 Filed 4–5–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

[Project No. 11402–000 Michigan]

City of Crystal Falls, MI; Notice of

Availability of Draft Environmental

Assessment

March 31, 1995.

In accordance with the National

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and

the Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission’s (Commission’s)

regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No.

486, 52 FR 47897), the Office of

Hydropower Licensing has reviewed the

application for an original license for

the Crystal Falls Hydroelectric Project,

located in Iron County, Michigan, and

has prepared a Draft Environmental
17526 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 66 / Thursday, April 6, 1995 / Notices

Assessment (DEA) for the project. In the

DEA, the Commission’s staff has

analyzed the potential environmental

impacts of the existing unlicensed

project and has concluded that approval

of the project, with appropriate

environmental protection or

enhancement measures, would not

constitute a major federal action

significantly affecting the quality of the

human environment.

Copies of the DEA are available for

review in the Public Reference Branch,

Room 3104, of the Commission’s offices

at 941 North Capitol Street, NE.,

Washington, DC 20426.

Any comments should be filed within

45 days from the date of this notice and

should be addressed to Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission, 825 North Capitol Street,

NE., Washington, DC 20426. Please affix

‘‘Crystal Falls Hydroelectric Project No.

11402’’ to all comments. For further

information, please contact Tom Dean at

(202) 219–2778.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–8430 Filed 4–5–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Project No. 2290–006–CA]

Southern California Edison Company;

Renotice of Availability of Draft

Environmental Assessment

March 31, 1995.

In accordance with the National

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and

the Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission’s (Commission’s)

regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No.

486, 52 FR 47897), the Office of

Hydropower Licensing has reviewed the

application for new license for an

existing licensed hydropower project on

the Kern River owned and operated by

the Southern California Edison

Company: the Kern River No. 3 Project

No. 2290, located in Kern and Tulare

Counties, California. Subsequently, the

Commission’s staff prepared a Draft

Environmental Assessment (DEA) that

discusses the relicensing of the project.

In the DEA, staff evaluates the

potential environmental impacts that

would result from the continued

operation of the project. Staff concludes

that relicensing the project with

appropriate enhancement measures

would not constitute a major federal

action significantly affecting the quality

of the human environment.

Copies of the DEA are available for

review in the Public Reference Branch,

Room 3104, of the Commission’s offices

at 941 North Capitol Street, NE.,

Washington, DC 20426.

Any comments should be filed within

45 days from the date of this notice and

should be addressed to Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission, 825 North Capitol Street,

NE., Washington, DC 20426. Please affix

Project No. 2290 to the first page of all

comments.

For further information, please

contact Kathleen Sherman,

Environmental Coordinator, at (202)

219–2834.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–8470 Filed 4–5–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. RP95–214–000]

Colorado Interstate Gas Company;

Notice of Tariff Compliance Filing

March 31, 1995.

Take notice that on March 28, 1995,

Colorado Interstate Gas Company (CIG),

tendered for filing as part of its FER Gas

Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, the

following tariff sheets, with an effective

date of April 1, 1995:

First Revised Sheet No. 369A

First Revised Sheet No. 369B

CIG states that the above-referenced

tariff sheets are being filed to reflect that

all Buyers have paid in full for

obligations pursuant to Docket Nos.

RP94–85 and RP94–130. (Docket Nos.

RP94–85 and RP94–130 are the latest

dockets where CIG has sought recovery

of take-or-pay ‘‘buyout’’ or ‘‘buydown’’

costs pursuant to the Commission’s

Order No. 528.)

CIG states that copies of this filing

were served upon all parties in this

proceeding and affected state

commissions.

Any person desiring to be heard or to

protest said filing should file a motion

to intervene or a protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street, NE.,

Washington, DC 20426, in accordance

with §§ 385.211 and 385.214 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211).

All such petitions or protests should be

filed on or before April 7, 1995. Protests

will be considered by the Commission

in determining the appropriate action to

be taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection in the public reference room.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–8433 Filed 4–5–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. TM95–7–23–001]

Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company;

Notice of Filing of Corrected Tariff

Sheets

March 31, 1995.

Take notice that Eastern Shore

Natural Gas Company (ESNG) tendered

for filing on March 28, 1995 certain

substitute revised tariff sheets included

in Appendix A attached to the filing.

Such sheets are proposed to be effective

April 1, 1995.

On March 14, 1995, ESNG filed

revised tariff sheets in Docket No.

TM95–7–23–000 to track changes in

Transco’s fuel retention percentages and

ESNG’s pipeline suppliers’ storage

service rates, both to be effective April

1, 1995.

ESNG has since discovered on its

Schedule D1, Text ID 9, Working Paper

#1, Page 2, Note 2, that when calculating

its PS/FT Demand Charge the TBO Unit

Rate of $0.0165 and the Zone 3 Electric

Power Unit Rate of $0.0118 (from

Transco’s Firm Transportation Service

Rates, 9th Revised Second Revised

Sheet No. 40) were used twice, and

therefore, the PS/FT Demand Charge

was overstated by $0.0283. The

substitute tariff sheets correct this

overstatement.

Additionally, ESNG is refiling its

Fifth Revised Sheet No. 7 due on the

final tariff sheet. ESNG on its redlined

copy of Fifth Revised Sheet 7, in its

original filing, changed from Fourth

Revised Sheet No. 7 to Fifth Revised No.

7, but failed to change the pagination

number on its final tariff sheet. Included

in this filing is a properly paginated

Sheet No. 7.

ESNG states that copies of the filing

have been served upon its jurisdictional

customers and interested State

Commissions.

Any person desiring to be heard or to

protest said filing should file a motion

to intervene or protest with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission, 825

North Capitol Street, NE., Washington,

DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 18

CFR 385.211 and 385.214 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure. All such motions or protests

should be filed on or before April 7,

1995. Protests will be considered by the

Commission in determining the

appropriate action to be taken, but will