alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Organization Name:

Note: Representatives submitting on behalf of an organization must enter information below.

Requestor Representative:

Section 301 Investigation: China's Acts, Policies, and Practices Related to Technology 

Transfer, Intellectual Property, and Innovation - Form to Request Exclusion of Product

When submitting a product exclusion request using this form, enter the specified 

information in the following fields and explain the basis and rationale for your statements. 

By completing this form, you certify that the information provided is complete and 

correct to the best of your knowledge. 

1. Indicate whether the comment contains business confidential information (BCI), is a public

document, or is a public version of a BCI document.

3.

2. Please provide a complete and detailed description of the product of concern:

4.

5. Requestor's relationship to the product:

CONTINUED BELOW

*

10-digit HTSUS item number* for product you wish to address in this product exclusion request:

Use numerical characters only with no special characters (example: 1023456789). For help in finding 

the HTSUS item number associated with your product, see https://hts.usitc.gov/

1

7.

6. Does this submission in regulations.gov include additional attachments?

Please indicate whether any additional attachment contains business confidential

information (BCI), is a public document, or is a public version of a BCI document.

VERSION 1

Requestor Information

Requestor Name (Last, First):

Public Version of BCI

DD2990900 SUBASSEMBLY FOR CORDLESS TORQUE WRENCH PUMP

8413919050 Schmidt, Jackie Enerpac Jackie SchmidtImporter Yes Contains BCI
END 2

8. Is this product, or a comparable product, available from sources in the United States?:

VERSION 1

11. Please provide information in support your request, taking account of the instructions

provided in Section B of the Federal Register notice (note: text entered below can extend

beyond the apparent size of this box).

9. Is this product, or a comparable product, available from sources in third countries?:

10. Please provide the value and quantity (with units) of the Chinese-origin product of concern

that you purchased for each calendar year specified. Limit this figure to the products

purchased by your firm (or by members of your trade association) alone. Please provide 

estimates if precise figures are unavailable.

2016 Value:

2015 Value:

2017 Value:

2016 Quantity:

2015 Quantity:

2017 Quantity:

No No BCI BCI BCI BCI BCI BCI

See addendum for additional information.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-3390

Nissan North America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
#### Christopher COLEMAN, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

No. 67830.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Jan. 2, 1996.

Dave Hemingway, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., David R. Truman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and DOWD, JJ.

*ORDER.*

Movant appeals the denial, without an evi-dentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their *136information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

for the Fifth Circuit

_____________________________________

No. 96-11371

Summary Calendar

_____________________________________

TIMOTHY E. WHEELER,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

JIM BOWLES, Sheriff, ET AL

Defendants,

JIM BOWLES, Sheriff; STEVE BOWERS, Dr.

Defendants-Appellants.

______________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(3:95-cv-2413-BD)

______________________________________________________

August 7, 1997

Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appellants challenge the district court's order denying their

motion to dismiss based on qualified immunity. Wheeler, an inmate

in the Dallas County jail, sued appellants contending that they

provided inadequate medical care. The magistrate judge granted
 

1Although we conclude that we have no appellate jurisdiction,

the appeal is not frivolous and we deny Appellee Wheeler’s motion

for Fed. R. App. P. 38 sanctions.

2

summary judgment and dismissed a number of Wheeler's claims, but

declined to dismiss Wheeler's dental and medical care claims.

We have reviewed the summary judgment record and conclude that

factual development is needed to determine whether Wheeler's

medical conditions about which he complained were inadequately

treated were sufficiently serious to raise an Eighth Amendment

claim. Because the factual issues exist relating to the

seriousness of Wheeler's medical and dental condition, we conclude

that the district court correctly found that fact issues are

presented. Because fact issues are presented, we do not have

appellate jurisdiction to review the district court's denial of

defendant's qualified immunity motion.1 Johnson v. Jones, 115 S.

Ct. 2151, 2154 (1995); Nerren v. Livingston Police Department, 86

F.3d 469, 471-72 (5th Cir. 1996).

APPEAL DISMISSED.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 60 (Wednesday, March 29, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 16115]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7726]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration


Deposting of Stockyards

    Notice is hereby given, that the livestock markets named herein, 
originally posted on the dates specified below as being subject to the 
Packers and Stockyards Act, 1921, as amended (7 U.S.C. 181 et seq.), no 
longer come within the definition of a stockyard under the Act and are 
therefore, no longer subject to the provisions of the Act.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Facility No., name, and location of stockyard       Date of posting  
------------------------------------------------------------------------
AL-169  Northeastern Alabama Feeder Pig             May 22, 1987.       
 Association, Inc., Section, Alabama.                                   
AL-172  Northwest Alabama Feeder Pig Association,   June 8, 1987.       
 Russellville, Alabama.                                                 
AL-174  Central Alabama Feeder Pig Association,     May 27, 1987.       
 Clanton, Alabama.                                                      
TX-329  San Augustine Livestock Auction, Inc., San  July 16, 1984.      
 Augustine, Texas.                                                      
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice is in the nature of a change relieving a restriction 
and, thus, may be made effective in less than 30 days after publication 
in the Federal Register without prior notice or other public procedure. 
This notice is given pursuant to section 302 of the Packers and 
Stockyards Act (7 U.S.C. 202) and is effective upon publication in the 
Federal Register.

    Done at Washington, DC, this 23rd day of March 1995.
Daniel L. Van Ackeren,
Acting Director, Livestock Marketing Division.
[FR Doc. 95-7726 Filed 3-28-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3210-KD-P
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-4523

Farris Engineering:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
Exhibit 13.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Magal Security System Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Raya Asher, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/Raya Asher*
--------------
Raya Asher
Chief Financial Officer

June 30, 2005


* The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the
Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

#### **SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS**

#### ** **

ThisCertificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of Section 1350of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal Procedures) of theUnited States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not, except to the extent required by theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

Theundersigned, who are the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer ofBehringer Harvard Opportunity REIT I, Inc. (the “Company”), each herebycertify as follows:

 

TheQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company (the “Report”), whichaccompanies this Certificate, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Dated this 14thday of November, 2008.

 

 
|   | /s/ Robert S. Aisner                       |
|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|   | Robert S. Aisner, Chief  Executive Officer |
|   |                                       |
|   |                                       |
|   | /s/ Gary S. Bresky                         |
|   | Gary S. Bresky, Chief  Financial Officer   |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-5537

ECM Industries LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

**Subsidiaries of Registrant**

 

 
| **SUBSIDIARY**                                     |   | **JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION**   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------|
|                                               |   |                                |
| Cymer (Barbados) Ltd.                              |   | Barbados                            |
|                                               |   |                                |
| Cymer B.V.                                         |   | Netherlands                         |
|                                               |   |                                |
| Cymer International, Ltd.                          |   | Barbados                            |
|                                               |   |                                |
| Cymer Japan, Inc.                                  |   | Japan                               |
|                                               |   |                                |
| Cymer Korea, Inc.                                  |   | Korea                               |
|                                               |   |                                |
| Cymer Services, Inc.                               |   | Nevada                              |
|                                               |   |                                |
| Cymer Singapore Pte Ltd.                           |   | Singapore                           |
|                                               |   |                                |
| Cymer Southeast Asia, Ltd.                         |   | Taiwan                              |
|                                               |   |                                |
| Active Control eXperts (ACX)                       |   | Delaware                            |
|                                               |   |                                |
| Cymer Semiconductor Equipment (Shanghai)  Co., Ltd |   | the People’s Republic of China |

 

----
EXHIBIT 23.1





Consent of BDO USA, LLP





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND STOCKHOLDERS


MULTIMEDIA GAMES, INC.


AUSTIN, TEXAS





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-167017, 333-159242, 333-23123, 333-51072, 333-100611, 333-100612 and 333-114345) and Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-16729, 333-28367, 333-36319, 333-64128 and 333-85382) of Multimedia Games, Inc. of our reports dated December 10, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements, financial statement schedule, and the effectiveness of Multimedia Games, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this annual report on Form 10-K.





/s/ BDO USA, LLPBDO USA, LLPDecember 10, 2010
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

April 12, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5032

Goodman Manufacturing Company, LP: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_04.15.19.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DAOOD QUODOS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 379 EAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 10th day of January, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**Consent of BDO Seidman, LLP**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 

 

MULTIMEDIA GAMES, INC. 

AUSTIN, TEXAS 

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements ofMultimedia Games, Inc., on Form S-8 (File No. 333-23123, File No. 333-51072, File No. 333-100611 and File No. 333-100612) and Form S-3 (File No. 333-30721 and File No. 333-64128) of our report dated November 7, 2003, relating to the consolidatedfinancial statements and schedule of Multimedia Games, Inc. appearing in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2003. 

 

BDO Seidman, LLP 

 

Houston, Texas 

December 29, 2003
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 25, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-41062

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JUAN ALBERTO GUZMAN-SANCHEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:05-CR-72-ALL 

--------------------

Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Juan Alberto Guzman-Sanchez (Guzman) pleaded guilty to

illegal reentry after deportation and was sentenced to 33 months

of imprisonment. 

Guzman’s constitutional challenge to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) is

foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224,

235 (1998). Although Guzman contends that Almendarez-Torres was

incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court

would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi v. New

Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such
No. 05-41062

-2-

arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding. 

See United States v. Garza-Lopez, 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.),

cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Guzman properly concedes

that his argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and

circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for

further review. 

AFFIRMED.
2010 Executive Officer Compensation Arrangements



 Exhibit 10.55 

2010 Executive Officer Compensation Arrangements 

 

						
	 Executive Officer
	  	2010 Base Salary Rate	  	2010 Target Bonus as % of
Annual Base Salary Rate
			
	 Bruce C. Cozadd
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
	  	$	500,000.00	  	60
			
	 Robert M. Myers
President
	  	$	448,000.00	  	50
			
	 Kathryn E. Falberg
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	  	$	365,000.00	  	40
			
	 Carol A. Gamble
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
	  	$	361,000.00	  	40
			
	 Joan E. Colligan
Controller and Principal Accounting Officer
	  	$	217,250.00	  	10 -30