alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of SpeechSwitch, Inc. ("the Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Bruce
R. Knef, President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
          the Company.




          Date: November 14, 2006


          By /s/ Bruce R. Knef
             ---------------------------
             Bruce R. Knef
             President, Chief Executive Officer
             and Principal Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 61 (Thursday, March 30, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 16504]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7805]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Advanced Lead-Acid Battery Consortium

    Notice is hereby given that, on February 17, 1995, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the Advanced Lead-Acid 
Battery Consortium (``ALABC''), a discrete program of the International 
Lead Zinc Research Organization, Inc. (``ILZRO''), has filed written 
notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal 
Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Whatman Paper, 
Ltd., has withdrawn its membership with the ALABC.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership remains open and the 
ALABC intends to file additional written notification disclosing all 
changes in membership.
    On June 15, 1992, the ALABC filed its original notification 
pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on July 29, 1992, 57 Fr 33522. The last notification was filed 
with the Department on August 26, 1994.
    This notice has not yet been published in the Federal Register 
pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act.
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 95-7805 Filed 3-29-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-10400

Duda Energy LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
##### 



EXHIBIT 21.1
 CORPORATE STRUCTURE OF
SYNAGRO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
  
  1  2     3
  4
  
  4
  
 86




---



##### 



5
  6  7
 
 1
    
    Members are Synagro  WWT, Inc. (40%) and Carl D. Jones & Associates, P.C. (60%). Carl D.
Jones & Associates, P.C. is a non-affiliated third party.2
    
    Synagro  WWT, Inc. (70%) is the managing member. The other members are The McKissack Group,
Inc. (20%) and Len Parker Associates, Inc. (10%), both non-affiliated third parties.3
    
    Managing Member is Synagro  WWT, Inc. (30%). The other members are Synagro Woonsocket, LLC
(10%), Synagro South, LLC (30%) and Environmental Protection & Improvement Company, LLC (30%).4
    
    Partnership owned by Synagro Central, LLC (60%) and Synagro South, LLC (40%).5
    
    General Partner is Synagro Texas, LLC (1%) and the Limited Partner is Synagro Delaware, LLC
(99%).6
    
    General Partner is Synagro of Texas  CDR, Inc. (1%) and the Limited Partners are Synagro of
Texas  CDR, Inc. (9%) and Synagro Woonsocket, LLC (90%).7
    
    General Partner is Synagro of Texas  CDR, Inc. (1%) and the Limited Partner is Synagro
Woonsocket, LLC (99%). 87
Letter Amendment




 Exhibit 10.12 

 

 

 March 18, 2010 

Norman J. Szydlowski 
 1536
E. 35th Place 

Tulsa, OK 74105 
 Dear Norm: 

Pursuant to Section 5(d) of your employment agreement dated as of November 30, 2009 (the “Employment Agreement”),
among you, SemManagement, L.L.C. (“SemManagement”) and SemGroup Corporation, SemManagement agreed to purchase your residence located at 15700 Canterbury Chase, Milton, Georgia (the “Residence”), if by May 31, 2010, you have
been unable to enter into a contract for the sale of the Residence. It is our understanding that you have received an offer to purchase the Residence for $630,000 and that you have received two separate appraisals of the Residence, each reporting an
appraised value of the Residence of approximately $640,000. It has been proposed that in lieu of SemManagement’s commitment to purchase the Residence from you at the appraised value, you accept the offer of $630,000 and SemManagement will pay
you $10,000 as an additional relocation expense reimbursement under Section 5(b) of the Employment Agreement. The payment will be made on the date of the consummation of the sale of the Residence to the purchaser for $630,000, at which time
SemManagement and you will be deemed to have fully performed the respective obligations under Section 5(d). 
 If you are
agreeable to the terms of this letter, please acknowledge your consent to the terms hereof by signing the following page. Your acceptance of this letter agreement will be deemed to be an amendment of your Employment Agreement to effect the terms
hereof. All other terms and provisions of your Employment Agreement remain in full force and effect. 
  

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	SemGroup Corporation
		
	By:	 	 /s/ John F. Chlebowski

	Name:	 	John F. Chlebowski
	Title:	 	Chairman of the Board


 SemGroup
Corporation 

									
	6120 South Yale Avenue, Suite 700  	 	 Tulsa, OK 74136-4216  	 	 Tel: 918.524.8100  	 	 Fax: 918.524.8290  	 	 www.semgroupcorp.com










			
	SemManagement, L.L.C.
	
	By: SemGroup Corporation, Sole Member and Manager
		
	By:	 	 /s/ John F. Chlebowski

	Name:	 	John F. Chlebowski
	Title:	 	Chairman of the Board


 Consented
to this 18th day of March, 2010 

 

	
	 /s/ Norman J. Szydlowski

	 Norman J. Szydlowski
#### Gregg Michael HULSEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 66744.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

May 30, 1995.

Jeffrey K. Rath, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., James A. Chenault, III, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Mo. Dept, of Revenue, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Gregg Michael Hulsey, appeals from an order entered in the Circuit Court of the County of St. Louis denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the findings and conclusions of the circuit court are not clearly erroneous. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the circuit court’s order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum has been provided solely for the use of the parties here involved.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-6891

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL JACOBS,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:18-cr-00364-D-1)

Submitted: December 14, 2021 Decided: December 17, 2021

Before AGEE, RICHARDSON, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Jacobs, Appellant Pro Se. David A. Bragdon, Assistant United States Attorney, 

Lucy Partain Brown, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED 

STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael Jacobs appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for 

compassionate release. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Jacobs, 

No. 5:18-cr-00364-D-1 (E.D.N.C. May 19, 2021). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 07-13-00437-CV

In the Interest of A.A., a Child From the 108th District Court

of Potter County

April 2, 2014

Opinion by Chief Justice Quinn §

§

§

§

§

§

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated April 2, 2014, it is ordered, adjudged

and decreed that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed.

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis, no costs beyond those which

may have been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o
#### Grace Neuhaus RICHARDS, Robert L. Schwarz, Atlas & Hall and Morris Atlas v. Vernon F. NEUHAUS, Jr. and Lacey Louise Neuhaus.

No. D-3464.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Feb. 23, 1994.

ORDERS ON CAUSES

Agreed Motion to set aside judgments below and remand to effect settlement agreement filed herein on February 22, 1994, is *183granted; applications for writ of error on behalf of Grace Neuhaus Richards and on behalf of Robert L. Schwarz, Atlas & Hall and Morris Atlas were granted by this court on June 3,1993; the judgments of the courts below are set aside without reference to the merits, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for entry of judgment in accordance with the settlement agreement of the parties.

(Justice GONZALEZ not sitting)
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of SpeechSwitch, Inc. ("the Company") on
Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Bruce R. Knef,
President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:


     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
          the Company.




Date: January 16, 2006                 By /s/ Bruce R. Knef
                                          -----------------------------
                                          Bruce R. Knef
                                          President, Chief Executive Officer and
                                          Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 99.42











CONSENT OF MARLOW MINING ENGINEERING SERVICES





Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended September 30, 2004 (the Annual Report) of Western Silver Corporation (the Company), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.



We hereby consent to the references to our name under the heading Description of the Business  Peñasquito Project in the Companys Annual Report and to all other references to our name included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report, and we further consent to the reliance in the Annual Report on our independent technical report Preliminary Resource Estimate for the Peñasco Deposit, Peñasquito Project, State of Zacatecas, Mexico dated November 3, 2004, which was commissioned by Western Silver, which the Company used, or directly quoted from, in preparing summaries concerning the Peñasquito Project which appear in such Annual Report.





James Marlow, P. Eng





By:  /s/ James Marlow__________







Date: February 14, 2005
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5232

Williams Controls Incorporated:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests. 

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Exhibit 31.2



SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION



I, Thomas R. Staab II, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2017
of BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: March 27, 2018



/s/ Thomas R. Staab II

Thomas R. Staab II

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

(Principal Financial Officer)
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5341

Arrowhead Electrical Products, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**









In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Universal Capital Management, Inc.
      (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Joseph T. Drennan, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my
      knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.









/s/
      Joseph T. Drennan


Joseph
      T.
      Drennan


Treasurer
      (Principal Financial Officer)


March
      16,
      2006










The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and shall not be deemed
      filed
      by the Company for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act
      of
      1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to liability under that Section.
      This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into
      any
      filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act except to the extent
      that this certification is expressly incorporated by reference into any such
      filing.
EXHIBIT 32.2

       CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NASB Financial, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Rhonda Nyhus, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.


June 14, 2010              By:  /s/ Rhonda Nyhus
                                Rhonda Nyhus
                                Vice President and Treasurer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to NASB Financial, Inc. and will be retained by NASB
Financial, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.



This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for
any other purpose.

<Page>