alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 515 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 515

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax on 
                     repurchase of corporate stock.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 25, 2023

 Mr. Kustoff (for himself, Mr. LaHood, and Mr. Schweikert) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and 
                                 Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax on 
                     repurchase of corporate stock.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting American Savers and 
Retirees Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF EXCISE TAX ON REPURCHASE OF CORPORATE STOCK.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 37 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 
repealed.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of chapters for subtitle D is 
amended by striking the item relating to chapter 37.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2022.
                                 <all>
```
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-5939

Alo Tennessee Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
Exhibit 99.2



CERTIFICATION





I, Robert J. Gayton, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of WESTERN COPPER HOLDINGS LIMITED;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



Date: March 31, 2003



Robert Gayton

Robert J. Gayton

Chief Financial Officer





{00018235.DOC;1}
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Universal Capital Management, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ending July 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael D. Queen, Principal Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Michael D. Queen

Michael D. Queen,

Principal Executive Officer

September 19, 2011
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6264

CW Bearing USA, Inc:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_5-30-2019.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Wallace Williams, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Friedmann, J.), rendered December 2, 1988, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s challenges to the trial court’s charge to the jury are not preserved for appellate review as a matter of law *(see, People v Autry,*75 NY2d 836; *People v McDonald,*144 AD2d 701, 702). The trial court’s charge to the jury did not deprive the defendant of a fair trial and, therefore, reversal in the interest of justice is not warranted *(see, People v McDonald, supra,*at 702; *People v Ogle,*142 AD2d 608, 609). Mangano, P. J., Lawrence, Balletta and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
No. 333-16559 on Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 333-67491 on Form S-8
and Registration Statement No. 333-39101 on Form S-3 of our report dated
February 2, 1999, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cymer,
Inc., for the year ended December 31, 1998 and to the reference to us
under the heading "Selected Financial Data" in such Form 10-K.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE, LLP
San Diego, California
March 24, 1999
exv10w1






EXHIBIT 10.1





			
	 	 	 
	
	 	Corporate Offices:


    2525 East El Segundo Boulevard

El Segundo, California 90245-4632

(310) 536-0611





 


 



May 3, 2010



The CIT Group/Business Credit, Inc.

11 West 42nd Street, 13th Floor

New York, NY 10036



Attention: Eddy Milstein & Alan Strauss


Re:    Reduction in Line of Credit Pursuant to Section 7.12 of Financing Agreement


Dear Messrs. Milstein and Strauss:


Reference is made to the Second Amended and Restated Financing Agreement dated as of December 15,
2004 (as amended, modified, or supplemented from time to time, the “Financing Agreement”)
by and between The CIT Group/Business Credit, Inc., as the agent (the “Agent”) for the
financial institutions party thereto from time to time as lenders (the “Lenders”), Big 5
Corp. (“Big 5”), and Big 5 Services Corp. (“Big 5 Services,” and together with Big
5, the “Companies”). Terms used herein but not defined herein have the meanings given in
the Financing Agreement.


The Companies hereby irrevocably elect to permanently reduce the Line of Credit from $175,000,000
to $140,000,000, in accordance with Section 7.12 of the Financing Agreement, on May 17, 2010, ten
business days after delivery of this notice to the Agent.


Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions or concerns.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Sincerely,

BIG 5 CORP.

 	 
	 	/s/ BARRY D. EMERSON
 	 
	 	Barry D. Emerson

Senior Vice President &

Chief Financial Officer 	 
	 



Page 1 of 2



 


 




Address Reply To: Post Office Box 92088, Los Angeles, California 90009-2088





 









 








	 	 	 	 	 
	 	BIG 5 SERVICES CORP.

 	 
	 	/s/ BARRY D. EMERSON
 	 
	 	Barry D. Emerson

Senior Vice President &

Chief Financial Officer 	 
	 


CC: Jenkens & Gilchrist, LLP



Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT 99.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Nancy J. Baker, Chief FinancialOfficer of Cymer, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Registrant”), herebycertifies that, to the best of her knowledge:

**1.    **The Registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K towhich this certification is attached as Exhibit 99.2 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934.

**2.    **The information contained in the Report fairlypresents in all material respects the results of operations of the Registrantfor the periods covered by the Report and the Registrant’s financial conditionas of the end of those periods.

 

 
| Dated: March 27,  2003 |   | /s/  NANCY  J. BAKER           |   |
|------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------|--------|
|                   |   | Nancy J. Baker,  Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Cymer, Inc. and will be retained by Cymer,Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
#### David D. THOMAS, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 41782.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Sept. 12, 1989.

John A. Klosterman, Columbia, for mov-ant-appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before GAITAN, P.J., and MANFORD and ULRICH, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from the denial of a Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 62 (Friday, March 31, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 16657]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7834]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development
[Docket No. N-95-1917; FR-3778-N-30]


Federal Property Suitable as Facilities To Assist the Homeless

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and 
surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible 
use to assist the homeless.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 31, 1995.

ADDRESSES: For further information, contact David Pollack, Department 
of Housing and Urban Development, Room 7256, 451 Seventh Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TDD number for the 
hearing- and speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers 
are not toll-free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 
1-800-927-7588.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the December 12, 1988 
court order in National Coalition for the Homeless v. Veterans 
Administration, No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a 
weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus 
Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for 
suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the 
purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been 
determined suitable or unsuitable this week.

    Dated: March 24, 1995.
Jacquie M. Lawing,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Economic Development.
[FR Doc. 95-7834 Filed 3-30-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-29-M
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Tufco Technologies, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

|                        |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: December 29, 2003 |  | /s/ Louis LeCalsey, III              
|                        |  | Louis LeCalsey, III                  
|                        |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4727

Scosche Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXHIBIT 31.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, David R. Allen, Chief Financial Officer of Global Music International, Inc. (the "Registrant"), certify that:





1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 of the Registrant;





2. Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:





(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;





(c) disclosed in this report any changes in the Registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):





(a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal controls over financial reporting





Dated: September 15, 2011
By:
/s/ James FallacaroJames FallacaroChief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charles Brager, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Counsel’s application to withdraw granted *(see, People v Crawford,*71 AD2d 38). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Mark, J.—violation of probation.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LORENZO MAGANA, a.k.a. Lorenzo

Magana-Mendoza,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-71232

Agency No. A072-232-210

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 19, 2010** 

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, TALLMAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

Lorenzo Magana, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. 

FILED

OCT 26 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-71232

We review de novo questions of law, Cazarez-Gutierrez v. Ashcroft, 382 F.3d 905,

909 (9th Cir. 2004), and we deny the petition for review. 

Magana’s conviction for receipt of stolen property in violation of Cal. Penal

Code § 496(a) is an aggravated felony under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(G). See

Verdugo-Gonzalez v. Holder, 581 F.3d 1059, 1060-61 (9th Cir. 2009).

We disagree with Magana’s contention that his conviction records do not

constitute admissible evidence. See Sinotes-Cruz, 468 F.3d 1190, 1196-97 (9th

Cir. 2006) (holding that “[t]he guiding principle is that proper authentication

requires some sort of proof that the document is what it purports to be”). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.