alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 65 (Wednesday, April 5, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 17371]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8325]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-30,820]


General Electric Capital Corporation, G.E. Electronic Rental and 
Repair, Erie, Pennsylvania; Notice of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on March 20, 1995 in response to a worker petition which 
was filed on behalf of workers and former workers at G.E. Electronic 
Rental and Repair, a subdivision of General Electric Capital 
Corporation, Erie, Pennsylvania (TA-W-30,820).
    The Department of Labor has verified that the three petitioners 
were not employed by the above subject firm or its subdivision, and 
that each worker represented a separate firm. Consequently, this is not 
a valid petition and the Department of Labor cannot make a 
determination as to whether the workers are eligible for adjustment 
assistance benefits under the Trade Act of 1974.
    Therefore, further investigation in this matter would serve no 
purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 27th day of March 1995.
Victor J. Trunzo,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 95-8325 Filed 4-4-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 66 (Thursday, April 6, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 17603]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8505]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

Fitness Determination of Downeast Flying Service, Inc.

AGENCY: Department of Transportation

ACTION: Notice of Commuter Air Carrier Fitness Determination--Order 95-
3-59, Order to Show Cause.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Transportation is proposing to find Downeast 
Flying Service, Inc., fit, willing, and able to provide commuter air 
service under 49 U.S.C. 41738 (see former section 419(e) of the Federal 
Aviation Act).

RESPONSES: All interested persons wishing to respond to the Department 
of Transportation's tentative fitness determination should file their 
responses with the Air Carrier Fitness Division, X-56, Department of 
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, S.W., Room 6401, Washington, D.C. 
20590, and serve them on all persons listed in Attachment A to the 
order. Responses shall be filed no later than April 17, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carol Woods, Air Carrier Fitness 
Division (X-56, Room 6401), U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366-2340.

    Dated: March 31, 1995
Patrick V. Murphy,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs.
[FR Doc. 95-8505 Filed 4-5-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
```
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2216

General Tools:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Universal Truckload Services, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the thirteen weeks ended October 1, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Donald B. Cochran, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
Robert E. Sigler, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge,
respectively, that (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 14, 2005

                              /s/ Donald B. Cochran
                              -------------------------
                              Donald B. Cochran
                              President and Chief Executive Officer

                              /s/ Robert E. Sigler
                              -------------------------
                              Robert E. Sigler
                              Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary
                              and Treasurer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3
(No. 333-139455) and Form S-8 (No. 333-152180, No. 333-150030, No. 333-147826,
No. 333-144673, No. 333-137010, No. 333-134428, No. 333-116960, No. 333-116959,
No. 333-105553, No. 333-97369, No. 333-63070, No. 333-42656, No. 333-04186, and
No. 333-30111) of Conceptus, Inc. of our report dated March 15, 2010 relating to the consolidated financial statements, financial statement schedule, and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS
LLP

San
Jose, California
March 15, 2010

---
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5661

Seaboard International, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6289

CW Bearing USA, Inc:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
#### Ronald E. SMITH, et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF GLADSTONE, Mo., Respondent.

No. WD 48464.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Nov. 8, 1994.

Joseph Decuyper, Kansas City, for appellants.

Richard Bien, Kansas City, for respondent.

Before ULRICH, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and HANNA, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs appeal the trial court’s order denying injunctive relief which they had sought to prevent the City of Gladstone from demolishing their commercial budding.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
#### Margarine YATES, Respondent, v. Nathaniel YATES, Appellant.

No. WD 48666.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

June 21, 1994.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Aug. 2, 1994.

Application to Transfer Denied Sept. 20, 1994.

George Alvin Wheeler, Kansas City, for appellant.

Philip F. Cardarella, Kansas City, for respondent.

Before TURNAGE, P.J., and FENNER and HANNA, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from denial of motion to set aside default judgment in dissolution of marriage proceeding.

Judgment affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.-16(b).
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In
connection with the Annual Report of GeoGlobal Resources Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jean Paul Roy, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:





1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and





2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      for the periods presented.

















/s/
Jean Paul Roy


---------------------------


Jean Paul
Roy


President
and Chief Executive Officer


March 26,
2009
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7653

EDISON CHAVIS, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MORRIS BEDSOLE; ANN CAMPBELL; EARL BUTLER,

a/k/a Moose; DAN FORD; MORRIS SIMPSON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District

Judge. (CA-95-700-5-BR)

Submitted: November 6, 1997 Decided: November 18, 1997

Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edison Chavis, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Bobby Grey Deaver, Fayetteville, North Carolina; Larry James McGlothlin, Fayetteville, North

Carolina; Douglas Edward Canders, CUMBERLAND COUNTY ATTORNEY'S

OFFICE, Fayetteville, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Chavis

v. Bedsole, No. CA-95-700-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Sept. 13, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### John W. WALKER, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 41227.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

June 13, 1989.

Elizabeth Clarke, Columbia, for movant-appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before BERREY, P.J., and MANFORD and NUGENT, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from the denial, after evidentiary hearing, of a Rule 27.26 motion for post-conviction relief.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4192

Tianhai Electric North America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-5383

Robert Bosch Tool:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4391 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4391

  To establish rules for export certification of devices manufactured 
                     outside of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 14, 2022

  Mr. Cassidy introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To establish rules for export certification of devices manufactured 
                     outside of the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Correcting a Lack of Efficient, 
Adequate, and Reasonable Documentation Act'' or the ``CLEAR 
Documentation Act''.

SEC. 2. CERTIFICATION OF IMPORTED DEVICES.

    Section 801(e)(4)(E) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act 
(21 U.S.C. 384(e)(4)) is amended by striking clause (iii) and inserting 
the following:
    ``(F)(i) The Secretary shall issue a certification under 
subparagraph (A) for a device manufactured by an establishment located 
outside of the United States that is registered under section 510(i), 
if the device--
            ``(I) is listed pursuant to section 510(j);
            ``(II) has been approved under section 515 or cleared under 
        section 510(k), or is not required to submit a premarket report 
        pursuant to subsection (l) or (m) of section 510;
            ``(III) is imported or offered for import into the United 
        States; and
            ``(IV) otherwise meets the requirements of this Act.
    ``(ii)(I) A certification for a device described in clause (i)--
            ``(aa) shall be subject to the fee described in 
        subparagraph (B); and
            ``(bb) notwithstanding subparagraph (C), shall address and 
        include the same material information as a Certificate to 
        Foreign Government, and shall have a document title that 
        includes the words `Certificate to Foreign Government'.
    ``(iii) The requirements and procedures of subparagraph (E) shall 
apply to a denial of a certification under this subparagraph.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 26, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-6041

Peabody Energy Corporation:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
<PAGE>   1

PLANET POLYMER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.                                   EXHIBIT 11.1
STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF COMMON AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARES
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         Years ended December 31,
                                                       ---------------------------
                                                          1998              1997
                                                       ---------         ---------
<S>                                                    <C>               <C>      
Shares outstanding at beginning of period              5,271,269         5,271,269
    7,337 shares issued on December 15, 1997               7,337               306
    21,538 shares issued on December 31, 1997             21,538                60
                                                       ---------         ---------
Weighted average number of shares                      5,300,144         5,271,635
                                                                         =========
    10,169 shares issued on March 15, 1998                 8,107
    8,695 shares issued on June 15, 1998                   4,741
    13,483 shares issued on September 15, 1998             3,953
    8,571 shares issued on December 15, 1998                 352
                                                       ---------
Weighted average number of shares                      5,317,297
                                                       =========
</TABLE>