U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 close



Research
                Research Home
                            National Programs
                            Research Projects
                            Scientific Manuscripts
                            International Engagement
                            Scientific Software/Models
                            Databases and Datasets
                            Office of Scientific Quality Review
            Media
                News & Features
                            Multimedia
                            Briefing Room
                            Down on the Farm
                            Press Room
                            Science in Your Shopping Cart
                            Scientific Discoveries
                            Tellus
                            Under the Microscope
            About ARS
                About ARS Home
                            Staff Directory
                            Labs and Research Centers (Map)
                            Headquarter Offices
                            Organizational Chart
                            Employee Services (REE Employees Only)
                            Office of Outreach, Diversity, and Equal Opportunity
            Work With Us
                Work With Us Home
                            ARS Vacancies at USAJOBS
                            Careers at ARS Information
                            Scientific Collaborations
                            Extramural Agreements
                            1890 Faculty Research Sabbatical ProgramSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Research Publications at this Location





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Title:   Author  item
                                            Ferrell, Calvinitem
                                            Berry, Elaineitem
                                            Freetly, Harveyitem
                                            Miller, Daniel
  Submitted to: Journal of Animal Science
                                    Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal
                                    Publication Acceptance Date: 4/21/2006
                                    Publication  Date: 9/1/2006
                                    Citation: Ferrell, C.L., Berry, E.D., Freetly, H.C., Miller, D.N. 2006. Influence of genotype and diet on steer performance, manure odor, and carriage of pathogenic and other fecal bacteria.  I. Animal performance. Journal of Animal Science. 84:2515-2522.Interpretive Summary: Differences in numerous traits among breed crosses were observed in this study.  Those differences reflected, in part, lower feed intake, lower performance, and reduced carcass quality characteristics of Brahman as compared to MARC III steers.  Many of these genotypic differences appeared to be negated by the high level of heterosis of the 1/2 Brahman steers.  No evidence was observed to support suggestions that Brahman crossbred steers respond to varying diet quality differently than Bos taurus steers.  Performance and feed utilization was reduced in steers grown on bromegrass hay but compensation was observed when they were switched to a high concentrate diet, as compared to those that were grown on a corn silage diet.  However, when evaluated over the total system, compensatory responses were insufficient to totally overcome reduced performance during the growing period.
                                Technical Abstract: Objectives were to evaluate genotype and diet effects on steer performance during the growing period and subsequent responses to a high concentrate diet during the finishing period.  Fifty-one steers [0 (15), 1/4 (20), 1/2 (7), and 3/4 Brahman (9) with the remaining proportion being MARC III] were allotted to eight pens.  Beginning December 2, steers were individually fed chopped bromegrass hay (BG; N = 26; DM = 0.85, CP = 9.5%, ME = 2.19 Mcal/kg) or a corn silage-based diet (CS; N = 25; DM = 0.51, CP = 11.9%, ME = 2.75 Mcal/kg) for 119 d (PD 1).  All steers were then fed a high corn diet (HC; DM = 0.79, CP = 11.7, ME = 3.08 Mcal/kg) to a target BW of 560 kg (PD 2; 176 d).  Data were analyzed by ANOVA with genotype, diet (BG, CS), and the two-way interaction included.  The interaction was not significant (P > 0.25).  MARC III and 1/2 Braham steers weighed more (P < 0.01) than 1/4 or 3/4 Brahman steers initially, and at the end of PD 1, but final wt (559 kg) by design, did not differ due to genotype or diet.  Weight of BG (325 kg) steers was less than CS (384 kg) steers at the end of PD 1.  Steer ADG and intake of DM, CP, and ME were less (P < 0.05) for 1/4 and 3/4 Brahman than for 0 or 1/2 Brahman during PD 1, PD 2, and total, but efficiency did not differ among genotypes (P > 0.10).  Carcass wt, marbling score, quality grade (P < 0.05), and kidney fat (P = 0.06) differed among genotypes.  Other carcass traits did not differ significantly (P > 0.10) among genotypes.  During PD 1, daily DMI (6.91 vs. 7.06 kg) was similar, but CP (0.66 vs. 0.84 kg) and ME (15.2 vs. 19.4 Mcal) intake of BG was less (P < 0.001) than CS.  Values for DMI/gain (22.3 vs. 7.43 kg/kg), CP intake/gain (2.13 vs. 0.88 kg/kg), and ME intake/gain (48.8 vs. 20.4 Mcal/kg) were greater (P < 0.01) in BG than CS.  Over the total study, ADG was lower (0.96 vs. 1.01 kg), and DMI (7.82 vs. 7.19 kg), DM intake/gain (8.21 vs. 7.10 kg/kg), and ME intake/gain (22.6 vs. 20.9 Mcal/kg) were greater (P < 0.05) in BG than in CS fed steers.  Carcass weight, dressing percentage, adjusted backfat, and yield grade were greater (P < 0.04) for CS than for BG, but marbling, quality grade, and longissimus area did not differ.  These data suggest differences exist among these genotypes in feed intake and performance, but little difference in efficiency was observed.  Compensatory performance during finishing was insufficient to overcome reduced performance during the growing period in terms of overall feed efficiency of the system.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov