alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM GLOBAL
INDUSTRIES, LTD.'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          63,981
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   51,762
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               151,642
<PP&E>                                         243,915
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 442,687
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           47,915
<BONDS>                                         40,947
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           454
<OTHER-SE>                                     311,773
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   422,687
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               229,142
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  165,889
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,358
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 48,475
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,543
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             33,932
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    33,932
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3345

Rikon Power Tools Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Allen MURPHY, Defendant/Appellant. Allen MURPHY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

Nos. 60656, 63038.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Nov. 2, 1993.

S. Paige Canfield, St. Louis, for defendant-appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jennifer A. Glancy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff-respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of first degree assault, § 565.050, RSMo 1986, and armed criminal action, § 571.015, RSMo 1986. The court sentenced him as a prior and persistent offender to concurrent terms of thirteen years’ imprisonment on the assault charge and three years’ imprisonment on the armed criminal action conviction. After sentencing, defendant filed a Rule 29.15 motion that the motion court denied without an evidentiary hearing. These appeals have been consolidated for review pursuant to Rule 29.15(Z). We affirm both judgments. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.-16(b).
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6185

Dallas Airmotive, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Exhibit
23.1

















CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Forms
S-8 Nos. 333-74245, 333-39450, 333-67720, 333-130135 and 333-136065) pertaining
to the 1998 Stock Incentive Plan and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
333-156429) pertaining to the 2008 Stock Incentive Plan of GeoGlobal Resources
Inc., of our report dated June 5, 2008 with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of GeoGlobal Resources Inc. included in the Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2007.







Our
report dated June 5, 2008, on the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, expresses our opinion that the
Company did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2007 because of the effect of material weaknesses on the
achievement of the objectives of the control criteria and contains an
explanatory paragraph that states the following material weaknesses have been
identified and included in management's assessment:




·
            Management
      maintained an inadequate complement of personnel with appropriate
      expertise or experience in generally accepted accounting
      principles.




·
            Management
      employed a limited number of accounting personnel with sufficient
      expertise in generally accepted accounting principles to enable effective
      segregation of duties with respect to recording journal entries and to
      allow for appropriate monitoring of financial reporting matters and
      internal control over financial
reporting.














"KPMG
LLP" (signed)





Calgary,
Canada


January
16, 2009
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5644

Apergy ESP Systems, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5855

Omron Management Center of America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXHIBIT 20

                               OFFICER'S STATEMENT

     James Ransom, Chief Accounting Officer of The Money Store Investment
Corporation (the Servicer), in accordance with Section 7.04 of the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement (Agreement) dated as of February 28, 1998 wherein The Money
Store Investment Corporation is the Servicer states the following pertaining to
Series 1998-1:


       (i)    the Servicer has fully complied with articles V and VII;

       (ii)   a review of  the activities of the Servicer during 1998 and of 
              its performance under the Agreement has been made under my 
              supervision;

       (iii)  to the best of my knowledge, based on my review, the Servicer has 
              fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout 1998 
              and there has been no default in the fulfillment of any such 
              obligation.


THE MONEY STORE COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE, INC.


BY:  /s/ JAMES RANSOM
     --------------------------
         James Ransom
         Chief Accounting Officer
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 68 (Monday, April 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18094-18095]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8675]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-226-000]


Mississippi River Transmission Corp.; Notice of Proposed Change 
in FERC Tariff

April 4, 1995.
    Take notice that on March 31, 1995 Mississippi River 
Transmission Corporation (MRT) tendered for filing as part of its 
FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff 
sheets, to become effective April 1, 1995:

Tenth Revised Sheet No. 5
Tenth Revised Sheet No. 6
Tenth Revised Sheet No. 7

    MRT states that the purpose of this filing is to adjust its rates 
to reflect additional Gas Supply Realignment Costs (GSRC) of $801,943, 
plus applicable interest, pursuant to Section 16.3 of the General Terms 
and Conditions of MRT's Tariff. MRT states that its filing includes the 
``Price Differential'' cost of continuing to perform under certain gas 
supply contracts during the months of October through December 1994.
    MRT states that copies of its filing have been mailed to all of its 
affected customers and the State Commissions of Arkansas, Missouri and 
Illinois.
    Any person desiring to be heard or protest the said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 
20426, in accordance with Secs. 385.211 and 385.214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedures: 18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214. All such 
motions and protests should be filed on or before April 11, 1995. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on 
[[Page 18095]] file with the Commission and available for public 
inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-8675 Filed 4-7-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of SAFER RESIDENCE CORPORATION (the Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report"), I, Melissa Blanchard, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Melissa Blanchard

Date: August 22 , 2005                      Melissa Blanchard

Principal Financial Officer
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING 

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED 

 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL 

 OF FLORIDA 

 SECOND DISTRICT 

In the Interest of D.S. and G.S., children. ) 

 ) 

 ) 

C.S., ) 

 ) 

 Appellant, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Case No. 2D16-1574 

 ) 

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND ) 

FAMILIES, GUARDIAN ) 

AD LITEM PROGRAM, and J.S., ) 

 ) 

 Appellees. ) 

 ) 

Opinion filed November 16, 2016. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Collier 

County; Joseph G. Foster, Judge. 

Richard F. Joyce of Law Office of Richard 

F. Joyce, P.A., Miami, for Appellant. 

Stephanie C. Zimmerman, Bradenton, 

for Appellee Department of Children and 

Families. 

Sara Goldfarb, Sanford, for Appellee 

Guardian Ad Litem Program. 

Whitney Coyne of Coyne Law, P.A., 

Sarasota, for Appellee J.S. 
- 2 - 

SLEET, Judge. 

 C.S., the natural mother of D.S. and G.S., appeals an order denying her 

motion to vacate an order closing the case and terminating the court's jurisdiction over 

the case. The proceeding that led to the entry of the order closing the case had been 

entered on the court's "own motion" without proper notice to the mother, and the order 

was entered over objection by the Department of Children and Families and the mother. 

In light of the Department's concession of error in this case, we decline to discuss all of 

the proceedings below. We observe only that prior to entering the order closing the 

case, the trial court had orally adjudicated the children dependent, but it had failed to 

enter a written order adjudicating the children dependent and it had failed to conduct a 

disposition hearing. The Department concedes that, under the facts in this case, the 

trial court was required to conduct a disposition hearing under section 39.521, Florida 

Statutes (2015), before closing the case and terminating jurisdiction. Accordingly, we 

reverse and remand for the trial court1 to enter a written order adjudicating the children 

dependent, hold a properly noticed disposition hearing, and enter a disposition order. 

The children shall remain in their current placement pending the entry of a disposition 

order. 

 Reversed and remanded. 

NORTHCUTT and KHOUZAM, JJ., Concur. 

 1A successor judge has been appointed to handle the case.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-19-00285-CR

ALLEN BYRD

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the

214th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 19FC-0513-F

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

July 25, 2019
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


               Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement 
(Form S-8 No. 33-97772) pertaining to the 1994 Incentive Stock Option and 
Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan of InfoMed Holdings, Inc., Registration 
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-51869) pertaining to the Simione Central Holdings, 
Inc. 1997 Non-Qualified Formula Stock Option Plan, Omnibus Equity-Based 
Incentive Plan, and the 1996 Stock Option Plan, and Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-70811) pertaining to the Simione Central Holdings, Inc. Omnibus 
Equity-Based Incentive Plan of our report dated February 23, 1998, with respect 
to the financial statements and schedule of Simione Central Holdings, Inc. as 
of December 31, 1997 and for each of the two years in the period then ended,
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1998.


                                                            ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Atlanta, Georgia
March 26, 1999
EXHIBIT 32




<PAGE>



     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bella Trading Company, Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form  10-QSB/A for the period  ending  December 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission (the "Report"),  Sara Preston,  the
Chief  Executive  and  Principal  Financial  Officer of the Company,  certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of her knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects the financial condition and results of the Company.



November 1, 2006                       By:  /s/ Sara Preston
                                            ----------------------------------
                                            Sara Preston, Chief Executive
                                            and Principal Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 69 (Tuesday, April 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 18439]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8782]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
[Treasury Order Number: 106-01]


Delegations of Authority to Act for the Secretary on Trust Fund 
Boards

    Dated: March 22, 1995.

    By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of the Treasury, 
including the authority vested by 31 U.S.C. 321(b) and delegated to the 
Deputy Secretary by Treasury Order (TO) 101-05, I hereby delegate to 
the Fiscal Assistant Secretary or, in the absence of that official, the 
person designated to act in that capacity, the authority to represent 
the Secretary of the Treasury as a member of the:
    1. National Archives Trust Fund Board (see 44 U.S.C. 2301) and to 
perform any act which the Secretary is authorized to perform in that 
capacity; and
    2. Library of Congress Trust Fund Board (see 2 U.S.C. 154) and to 
perform any act which the Secretary is authorized to perform in that 
capacity.
    3. CANCELLATIONS.
    a. Treasury Order (TO) 106-01, ``Delegation of Authority to Act for 
the Secretary on the National Archives Trust Fund Board,'' dated 
November 30, 1987.
    b. TO 106-10, ``The Library of Congress Trust Fund Board,'' dated 
June 22, 1978.
Frank N. Newman,
Deputy Secretary of the Treasury.
[FR Doc. 95-8782 Filed 4-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-25-P