alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Fred EDGAR, Jr., Appellant.

No. WD 44843.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Feb. 1, 1994.

*323Rosalynn Koch, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before SMART, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and FENNER, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from a conviction of assault in the first degree, § 565.050, RSMo 1986.

Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5588

Tianhai Electric North America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 62 (Friday, March 31, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 16567]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7899]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

18 CFR Part 385

[Docket No. RM92-12-000]


Streamlining of Regulations Pertaining to Parts II and III of the 
Federal Power Act and the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 
1978; Correction to Order No. 575

March 24, 1995.
AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On January 13, 1995 (60 FR 4831, January 25, 1995), the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission issued a final rule amending its 
regulations to streamline the processing the Commission's workload and 
to reduce regulatory burdens on the electric utility and qualifying 
facility industries. This document corrects an error in an amendment to 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure which was intended to 
remove the phrase ``or revised initial'' in Rule 713.

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 24, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:Lois D. Cashell, Secretary of the 
Commission (202) 208-0400.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Accordingly, the final rule published 
January 25, 1995, in the Federal Register at 60 FR 4831 (FR Doc. 95-
1449), is corrected as follows:


Sec. 385.713  [Corrected]

    On page 4860, in the third column, the amendatory instruction for 
Sec. 385.713 should be corrected to read as follows:
    32. In Sec. 385.713, in paragraph (a)(2)(i), the phrase ``or, if 
appropriate under Rules 717 and 711, to a revised initial decision'' is 
removed; in paragraph (a)(2)(iv), the phrase ``or revised initial'' is 
removed; and in paragraph (a)(3), the phrase ``or any revised initial 
decision under Rule 717'' is removed.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-7899 Filed 3-30-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4400

CW Bearing USA, Inc:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3959 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide the Secretary of Health 

and Human Services with the authority to suspend the right to introduce 

certain persons or property into the United States in the interest of 

the public health. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 30, 2022 

Mr. HAGERTY (for himself, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. RISCH, Mr. LEE, and Mrs. 

BLACKBURN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide the 

Secretary of Health and Human Services with the authority to suspend the right to introduce certain persons 

or property into the United States in the interest of 

the public health. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop Fentanyl Border 

5 Crossings Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3959 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROTECTION OF PUBLIC HEALTH. 

2 Section 362 of the Public Health Service Act (42 

3 U.S.C. 265) is amended— 

4 (1) by striking ‘‘Whenever the’’ and inserting 

5 the following: 

6 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Whenever the’’; and 

7 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(b) SUSPENSIONS RELATING TO ILLICIT DRUGS.— 

9 Whenever the Secretary determines that by reason of the 

10 existence of substantial illicit drug smuggling from a for11 eign country there is serious danger of the introduction 

12 of such drugs into the United States, and that this danger 

13 is so increased by the introduction of persons or property 

14 from such country that a suspension of the right to intro15 duce such persons and property is required in the interest 

16 of the public health, the Secretary, in accordance with reg17 ulations promulgated by the Secretary, shall have the 

18 power to prohibit, in whole or in part, the introduction 

19 of persons and property from such countries or places as 

20 he shall designate in order to avert such danger, and for 

21 such period of time as he may deem necessary for such 

22 purpose.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FRANCISCO ALVARO-IRAETA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 12-71287

Agency No. A071-644-613

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 25, 2015** 

Before: McKEOWN, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges. 

The 90-day stay of proceedings in this case expired on July 7, 2015. Thus,

respondent’s motion to lift the stay is denied as moot.

Francisco Alvaro-Iraeta, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an

FILED

SEP 04 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum,

withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture

(“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial

evidence the agency’s factual findings, including adverse credibility findings. 

Chebchoub v. INS, 257 F.3d 1038, 1042 (9th Cir.2001). We deny the petition for

review. 

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination

based on the inconsistencies between Alvaro-Iraeta’s asylum application and his

testimony regarding events in El Salvador and his reason for fleeing. See

Ceballos-Castillo v. INS, 904 F.2d 519, 520 (9th Cir. 1990); Zamanov v. Holder,

649 F.3d 969, 973 (9th Cir. 2011). We reject Alvaro-Iraeta’s contention that the IJ

failed to properly consider his explanations for the inconsistencies. See Zamanov,

649 F.3d at 974. In the absence of credible testimony, Alvaro-Iraeta’s asylum and

withholding of removal claims fail. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156

(9th Cir. 2003).

Alvaro-Iraeta does not raise any arguments challenging the agency’s denial

of CAT relief. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259 (9th Cir. 1996)

(issues not supported by argument are deemed abandoned).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

2 12-71287
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Michael D. Queen, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Universal Capital Management, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  March 14, 2013



/s/ Michael D. Queen

Michael D. Queen,

Principal Executive Officer
---

---

Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report
of Magal Security Systems Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period
ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Jacob Perry, Chairman of the Board of Directors of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|/s/ Jacob Perry
             
            
     *
Jacob PerryChairman of the Board of Directors(Interim Principal Executive Officer) |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

July 12, 2009

*     The
originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the Companys
offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.



---

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM GATEWAY 2000,
INC.'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER
30, 1996 AND THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         401,126
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  420,141
<ALLOWANCES>                                    18,561
<INVENTORY>                                    210,598
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,082,089
<PP&E>                                         402,512
<DEPRECIATION>                                  93,740
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,416,562
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          622,570
<BONDS>                                         12,374
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           767
<OTHER-SE>                                     724,223
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,416,562
<SALES>                                      3,482,398
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,482,398
<CGS>                                        2,821,896
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,821,896
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                13,760
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 460
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                248,146
<INCOME-TAX>                                    85,610
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            162,536
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   162,536
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.04
        


</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk November 21, 2011

t1114 

# Order

November 21, 2011

143169 & (158)

WHITESELL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant/ Appellant,

v SC: 143169 COA: 287569 Wayne CC: 05-518716-CZ WILLIAM WHITAKER, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/ Appellee, and

MRC INDUSTRIAL GROUP, INC., Defendant,
and

PIERCETEK, INC.,
Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion fo r miscellaneous relief is GRANTED. The application for leave to appe al the April 20, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is DENIED, because we are not pe rsuaded that the question pr esented should be reviewed by this Court.

Z AHRA , J., did not participate because he was on the Court of Appeals panel.
f10q1210a1ex10xxxx_att.htm


Exhibit (10)(40)


 


PROMISSORY NOTE


 


                                                                                                           


	$100,000.00	 December 21, 2010





 




FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, ATTITUDE DRINKS, INC.,  a Delaware corporation (“Debtor”), promises to pay to the order of Centaurian Fund LP, or its successors or assigns (“Lender”), on the sooner of (i) January 21, 2011 (“Maturity Date”), or (ii) from the proceeds of the next funding by Debtor, at c/o Grushko & Mittman, P.C., 515 Rockaway Avenue, Valley Stream, New York 11581, or at such other place as the Lender may designate from time to time in writing to the Debtor, in lawful money of the United States of America, the principal sum of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00), together with interest on the unpaid principal balance of this Note from the date hereof until paid at ten percent (10%) per annum.  In the event of Debtor’s default hereunder, interest on amounts past due pursuant to this Note shall be paid at a rate of eighteen percent (18%) per annum.  Interest shall be computed on the basis of a 360-day year.


 


The delay or failure to exercise any right hereunder shall not waive such right.  The undersigned hereby waives demand, presentment, protest, notice of dishonor or nonpayment, notice of protest, any and all delays or lack of diligence in collection hereof and assents to each and every extension or postponement of the time of payment or other indulgence.


 


The Lender may, at any time, present this Note or any sum payable hereunder to the Debtor in satisfaction of any sum due or payable by the Lender to Debtor for any reason whatsoever including but not limited to the payment for securities subscriptions.


 


In the event of default hereunder such that this Note is placed in the hands of an attorney for collection (whether or not suit is filed), or if this Note is collected by suit or legal proceedings or through bankruptcy proceedings, Debtor agrees to pay reasonable attorney’s fees and expenses of collection.


 


This Note shall be governed by, and construed and interpreted in accordance with, the laws of the State of New York.  Exclusive jurisdiction relating to this Note shall vest in courts located in New York State.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed and delivered this Note the date and year first above written.


 


ATTITUDE DRNKS, INC.


 


By:  s/s Roy G. Warren


Title:  Chief Executive Officer


 


Attest:  /s/s Debra Lieblong


Debra Lieblong
Exhibit 4.16





EXHIBIT 4.16




Supplemental Agreement I




This Supplemental Agreement dated June 30, 2009 (referred to herein as the “Agreement”) is
entered into in Guangzhou by and between:



Party A: Guangdong Meidiya Investment Co., Ltd.



Party B: Lin Keping



(Party A and Party B are referred to herein collectively as the “Parties” and each individually as a “Party”.)



WHEREAS the Parties have executed a Shareholders Agreement regarding Beijing Fanhua Datong
Investment and Management Co., Ltd. (referred to herein as the “Company”) on September 17, 2008
(referred to herein as the “Original Agreement”),



WHEREAS provisions in the Original Agreement regarding profit distributions are incomplete,



The Parties hereby made supplemental provisions in this regard and executed the Agreement.




	1.	 	Pursuant to the Original Agreement, Party B, on behalf of the Company’s management, pledges
that the Company shall achieve profitability from 2009 and makes corresponding performance
pledges. In addition, Party B agrees that Party A shall be entitled to enjoy annual net profit
of the Company for three years from 2009 to 2011.

	 
	2.	 	In the interest of Party A, Party B agrees that if the Company fails to realize profit for
the three years from 2009 to 2011 but incurs annual losses instead, then Party B shall borne
or make up for the losses in that year. Profits of the Company enjoyed by Party B in the
future shall be used first to offset the forgoing losses.

	 
	3.	 	The Agreement is supplemental to the Original Agreement. In the event of any discrepancy
between the Original Agreement and the Agreement, the relevant provisions of the Agreement
shall prevail. All other provisions of the Original Agreement shall continue in full force and
effect.

	 
	4.	 	The Agreement is executed in two originals and each Party shall keep one original. All
originals shall have the same legal effect.

	 
	5.	 	The Agreement shall become effective after it is signed by the Parties as of the date set
forth in the beginning of the Agreement.






(no text below this page)



 


1









 





Signature Pages




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties to the Agreement hereto officially executed the Agreement on the
date set forth in the beginning of the Agreement.



Party A: Guangdong Meidiya Investment Co., Ltd.



by Legal or



	 	 	 	 	 
	Authorized Representative:

	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 






Common seal: Guangdong Meidiya Investment Co., Ltd.



Party B: Lin Keping




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	By:  	/s/
Lin Keping	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 




Company (Seal): Beijing Fanhua Datong Investment and Management Co., Ltd.



by Legal or



	 	 	 	 	 
	Authorized Representative:

	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 






Common seal: Beijing Fanhua Datong Investment and Management Co., Ltd.



 


2