alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5582

Tianhai Electric North America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
ex1022.htm


Exhibit 10.22



Supply Agreement







Buyer:  Yangling Dongke Madisen Pharmaceutical co.,ltd


Signing place: Yangling


 


                                                     Date: Feb.2009


 


1 The products name, trade mark, size, manufacturer, unit, price, time and quantity


 



	
Products


name

	
Trade mark

	
size

	
Manu-


facturer

	
unit

	
quantity

	
Unit price

	
amount


	
Huanglongzhike


granule


 box

	
Yaowang mountain

	
98×72×80

	  	  	  	
0.34

	  
	  	
Yaowang mountain

	
98×72×80

	  	  	  	
0.34

	  
	
Tongmai


granule


box

	
Yaowang mountain

	
98×72×80

	  	  	  	
0.34

	  
	
4piece Fuyanshu


Box

	
Yaowang mountain

	
125×78×30

	  	  	  	
0.23

	  
	
5piece Fuyanshu


Box

	
Yaowang mountain

	
130×78×38

	  	  	  	
0.24

	  
	
3piece Yiganshukang box

	
Yaowang mountain

	
140×90×30

	  	  	  	
0.34

	  
	
4piece Yiganshukang box

	
Yaowang mountain

	
124×70×36

	  	  	  	
0.24

	  
	
Xinxinshu


capsule box


 

	
Yaowang mountain

	
115×65×29

	  	  	  	
0.20

	  
	
3piece Huanglong capsule box

	
Yaowang mountain

	
116×70×30

	  	  	  	
0.20

	  
	
Total amount in words:












2 The standards of quality, and time limit promised by the supplier: based on the requirement of the buyer, until used up all the materials.


3 Place of delivery: the buyer’s factory


 


 




  





  











  






 


 


4 Means of transportation and expenses: by car deliver to the factory


5 Reasonable damage and means of account: the supplier is responsible for the unqualified goods.


6 The package standard and recycle of the package: plaster in the inside, paper box in the outside, plus trade mark.


7 The standards for check and accept: based on the standards of the buyer’s quality department.


8 The spare parts, spare equipment and the way of supply:


9 Settlement method and time limit: transfer, the amount is based on the agreed by both parities.


10 Another guarantee documents is needed as the additional on of this agreement if it is needed.


11 The liability of breach the agreement: the breaking party is liable for the breach of the agreement.


12 The means of dealing with dispute: negotiation


13 Other agreed items: (1) lead time: 7days


 



	
Supplier


Company name


Address


Legal agent


Assigned agent


Telephone


Cable address


Bank


Account number


Zip code

	
Purchaser


Company name


Address


Legal agent


Assigned agent


Telephone


Cable address


Bank


Account number


Zip code

	
Notarial Advice:







                       


                   Validity: from Feb. 10, 2009 to Feb. 10, 2010









  





  











  


























Party A: Yangling Dongke Madisen Pharmaceutical co.,Ltd


Address: 8 Xinqiao Road Yangling Demonstration Zone


Zip Code: 712100


 


Party B:Xianyang kaiyuan industrial Co.Ltd


 


Address: Liangmahe Building on Dongfeng Road Xianyang,Shaanxi.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 69 (Tuesday, April 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18419-18420]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8807]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR


Notice of Public Information Collection Requirement Submitted to 
OMB for Review

    The Department of the Interior (DOI) has submitted the following 
information collection requirement to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, Public Law 96-11. Copies of 
the submission may be obtained by calling the Clearance Officer listed. 
Comments regarding this information collection should be addressed to 
the OMB reviewer listed and to the Clearance Officer listed.

OMB Number: 1000-0002
Type of Review: New Collection/Expedited Review
Title: Department of the Interior, Freedom of Information Reinvention 
Team Customer Survey
Description: This survey is being conducted to comply with National 
Performance Review initiatives. The information collected will be 
utilized to assess the effectiveness of, and public/customer 
satisfaction with, the DOI Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) process. 
It will allow the DOI to determine if, and where, changes to its FOIA 
process are needed to better meet the information needs of its FOIA 
requesters. The survey will be sent to a random sample of those members 
of the public who have submitted FOIA requests to the DOI. Response is 
voluntary. [[Page 18420]] 
Respondents: Individual members of the public and individuals 
affiliated with business or other for-profit institutions, with non-
profit or not-for-profit institutions, or with state, local, tribal or 
foreign governments.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 1,000
Estimated Burden Hours per Response: .25 hours
Frequency of Response: annual
Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 250 hours
Clearance Officer: Indur Goklany, Department of the Interior (PPA), 
Washington, D.C. 20240, (202) 208-4915
OMB Reviewer: Don Arbuckle, Office of Management and Budget (OIRA), 
Washington, D.C. 20503, (202) 395-7340

    Dated: April 4, 1995.
Albert C. Camacho,
Director, Office of Administrative Services.
[FR Doc. 95-8807 Filed 4-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-RK-M
EXHIBIT 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED,


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Multimedia Games, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2010 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, Patrick J. Ramsey,  President and Chief Executive Officer, and Adam D. Chibib, Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), that, based upon each of their respective knowledge:





|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:December 10, 2010/s/ Patrick J. RamseyPatrick J. RamseyPresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Adam D. ChibibAdam D. ChibibChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Multimedia Games, Inc., and will be retained by Multimedia Games, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 13, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4772

Duravant LLC and FMH Conveyors Americas:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests and the 

request failed to show that this particular product is available only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6179

Fluor Enterprises, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 63 (Monday, April 3, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 16917]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8101]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Fiscal Service
[Dept. Circ. 570, 1994 Rev., Supp. No. 15]


Surety Companies Acceptable on Federal Bonds; Redomestication; 
Cumberland Casualty & Surety Company

    Cumberland Casualty & Surety Company has redomesticated from the 
state of Texas to the state of Florida effective September 1, 1994. The 
company was last listed as an acceptable surety on Federal bonds at 59 
FR 34151, July 1, 1994.
    Federal bond-approving officers should annotate their reference 
copies of the Treasury Circular 570, 1994 revision, on page 34151 to 
reflect this change.
    Questions concerning this notice may be directed to the Surety Bond 
Branch, Funds Management Division, Financial Management Service, 
Department of the Treasury, Washington, DC 20227, telephone (FTS/202) 
874-6507.

    Dated: March 27, 1995.
Charles F. Schwan III,
Director, Funds Management Division, Financial Management Service.
[FR Doc. 95-8101 Filed 3-31-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5149 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to carry out a pilot program to provide 

stipends to certain members separating from the Armed Forces. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 4, 2023 

Mr. NEGUSE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to carry out a pilot 

program to provide stipends to certain members separating from the Armed Forces. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PILOT PROGRAM TO PROVIDE A MONTHLY STI4 PEND TO CERTAIN RECENTLY SEPARATED 

5 MEMBERS. 

6 (a) ESTABLISHMENT.—Not later than 180 days after 

7 the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of 

8 Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of Veterans 

9 Affairs, shall carry out a pilot program to provide a sti10 pend to a covered individual. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5149 IH

1 (b) AMOUNT.—A stipend paid under this section to 

2 a covered individual shall be in an amount that the Sec3 retary determines will pay for one month of food and hous4 ing for the household of such covered individual in the lo5 cation where such household resides. 

6 (c) PAYMENTS.—A covered individual shall receive a 

7 stipend under this section once a month for the first four 

8 months following the separation of the covered individual 

9 from the Armed Forces. 

10 (d) REPORT.—Not later than one year after the date 

11 of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit 

12 to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and 

13 House of Representatives regarding the pilot program. 

14 Such report shall include the following: 

15 (1) The number of covered individuals paid a 

16 stipend under this section. 

17 (2) The average amount of such a stipend. 

18 (3) The effectiveness of the program in miti19 gating financial hardships of covered individuals. 

20 (4) A plan to make the pilot program perma21 nent. 

22 (5) The recommendation of the Secretary 

23 whether to make the pilot program permanent. 

24 (e) TERMINATION.—The pilot program shall termi25 nate after operating for four months. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 5149 IH

1 (f) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

2 (1) The term ‘‘covered individual’’ means an in3 dividual— 

4 (A) who separates from the Armed Forces 

5 under honorable conditions after at least four 

6 years of service on active duty; and 

7 (B) whom the Secretary of Defense deter8 mines will experience financial hardship during 

9 the first 120 days following such separation. 

10 (2) The term ‘‘dependent’’ means a dependent 

11 registered under the Defense Enrollment Eligibility 

12 Reporting System. 

13 (3) The term ‘‘household’’ means a covered in14 dividual and all dependents of such covered indi15 vidual who share a residence. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5139 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5139

 To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to increase 
 the fine for certain fraudulent activities related to funds for child 
              nutrition programs, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 4, 2023

  Ms. Craig introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to increase 
 the fine for certain fraudulent activities related to funds for child 
              nutrition programs, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fighting Their Fraud Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. PREVENTION OF FRAUD UNDER CHILD NUTRITION PROGRAMS.

    Section 12(g) of the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act 
(42 U.S.C. 1760(g)) is amended by striking ``$25,000'' and inserting 
``$50,000''.
                                 <all>
```
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3030

Northern Tool & Equipment:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jesse SCOTT, Appellant.

No. WD 51227.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

June 18, 1996.

Emmett D. Queener, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Fernando Bermudez, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before LOWENSTEIN, P.J., and HANNA and SPINDEN, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

A jury convicted Jesse Scott of possessing marijuana and cocaine while being held in prison. He asserts that the circuit court plainly erred by requiring him to wear restraints at trial. He also asks us to review the prosecutor’s closing argument as plain error. We do not find plain error in either case and, therefore, do not review the unpre-served issues pursuant to Rule 30.20. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

PERFECT SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, INC.,

Appellant

v.

OLYMPUS AMERICA, INC., OLYMPUS MEDICAL 

SYSTEMS CORPORATION,

Appellees

______________________ 

2015-2045

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2014-

00241.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

ROBERT E. FREITAS, Freitas Angell & Weinberg LLP, 

Redwood City, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented 

by KAYLA ANN ODOM, DANIEL J. WEINBERG. 

DEBORAH E. FISHMAN, Kaye Scholer LLP, Palo Alto, 

CA, argued for appellees. Also represented by MARISA 

ARMANINO WILLIAMS, KATIE JEANNINE LEWIS SCOTT. 

______________________ 
 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (MOORE, SCHALL, and O’MALLEY, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 June 9, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 8 (Thursday, January 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2975-2976]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-837]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 94F-0415]

Ashland Chemical Co.; Filing of Food Additive Petition

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that 
Ashland Chemical Co., has filed a petition proposing that the food 
additive regulations be amended to provide for the safe use of 
polypropylene glycol with a molecular weight range of 1,200-3,000 grams 
per mole (g/mol), as a defoaming agent in processing beet sugar and 
yeast.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Aydin Orstan, Center for Food Safety 
and Applied Nutrition (HFS-217), Food and Drug Administration, 200 C 
St. SW., Washington, DC 20204-0002, 202-418-3076.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 
Act (sec. 409(b)(5) (21 U.S.C. 348(b)(5))), notice is given that a food 
additive petition (FAP 5A4436) has been filed by [[Page 2976]] Ashland 
Chemical Co., One Drew Plaza, Boonton, NJ 07005. The petition proposes 
to amend the food additive regulations in Sec. 173.340 Defoaming agents 
(21 CFR 173.340) to provide for the safe use of polypropylene glycol 
with a molecular weight range of 1,200-3,000 g/mol, as a defoaming 
agent in processing beet sugar and yeast.
    The agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.24(a)(9) that this action 
is of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a 
significant effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an 
environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is 
required.

    Dated: January 4, 1995.
Alan M. Rulis,
Acting Director, Office of Premarket Approval, Center for Food Safety 
and Applied Nutrition.
[FR Doc. 95-837 Filed 1-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
```