Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 67 / Friday, April 7, 1995 / Notices 17779

IV. Response of Toy Wonders, Inc.

15. Toy Wonders denies the

allegations of the staff set forth in

paragraphs 5 through 14 above that it

has knowingly introduced or caused to

be introduced into interstate commerce;

or received in interstate commerce and

delivered or proffered delivery thereof

for pay or otherwise, the banned

hazardous toys and misbranded

hazardous art materials, identified in

paragraphs 5 and 11 above, in violation

of the FHSA.

V. Agreement of the Parties

16. The Consumer Product Safety

Commission has jurisdiction over Toy

Wonders and the subject matter of this

Settlement Agreement and Order under

the following acts: Consumer Product

Safety Act, 15 U.S.C. 2051 et seq., and

the Federal Hazardous Substances Act,

15 U.S.C. 1261 et seq.

17. Upon final acceptance by the

Commission of this Settlement

Agreement and Order, the Commission

shall issue the attached Order

incorporated herein by this reference.

18. The Commission does not make

any determination that Toy Wonders

knowingly violated the FHSA. The

Commission and Toy Wonders agree

that this Agreement is entered into for

the purposes of settlement only.

19. Upon final acceptance of this

Settlement Agreement by the

Commission and issuance of the Final

Order, Toy Wonders knowingly,

voluntarily and completely waives any

rights it may have in this matter (1) to

an administrative or judicial hearing, (2)

to judicial review or other challenge or

contest of the validity of the

Commission’s actions, (3) to a

determination by the Commission as to

whether Toy Wonders failed to comply

with the FHSA as aforesaid, (4) to a

statement of findings of fact and

conclusions of law, and (5) to any

claims under the Equal Access to Justice

Act.

20. For purposes of section 6(b) of the

CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2055(b), this matter

shall be treated as if a complaint had

issued; and the Commission may

publicize the terms of the Settlement

Agreement and Order.

21. Upon provisional acceptance of

this Settlement Agreement and Order by

the Commission, this Settlement

Agreement and Order shall be placed on

the public record and shall be published

in the Federal Register in accordance

with the procedures set forth in 16 CFR

1118.20(e)–(h). If the Commission does

not receive any written request not to

accept the Settlement Agreement and

Order within 15 days, the Settlement

Agreement and Order will be deemed

finally accepted on the 16th day after

the date it is published in the Federal

Register.

22. The parties further agree that the

Commission shall issue the attached

Order; and that a violation of the Order

shall subject Toy Wonders to

appropriate legal action.

23. Agreements, understandings,

representations, or interpretations made

outside of this Settlement Agreement

and Order may not be used to vary or

to contradict its terms.

24. The provisions of the Settlement

Agreement and Order shall apply to Toy

Wonders, Inc. and each of its successors

and assigns.

Respondent Toy Wonders, Inc.

Dated March 16, 1995.

Samuel Su,

President Toy Wonders, Inc.

Dated: March 16, 1995.

Lu Su,

Manager, Toy Wonders, Inc.

Commission Staff

David Schmeltzer,

Assistant Executive Director, Office of

Compliance and Enforcement.

Eric L. Stone,

Acting Director, Division of Administrative

Litigation, Office of Compliance and

Enforcement.

Dated: March 17, 1995.

Earl A. Gershenow,

Trial Attorney, Division of Administrative

Litigation, Office of Compliance and

Enforcement.

Dated March 17, 1995.

Dennis C. Kacoyanis,

Trial Attorney, Division of Administrative

Litigation, Office of Compliance and

Enforcement.

Order

Under consideration of the Settlement

Agreement entered into between

respondent Toy Wonders, Inc., a

corporation, and the staff of the

Consumer Product Safety Commission;

and the Commission having jurisdiction

over the subject matter and Toy

Wonders, Inc.; and it appearing that the

Settlement Agreement and Order is in

the public interest, it is

Ordered, that the Settlement

Agreement and Order be and hereby is

accepted, as indicated below; and it is

Further Ordered, that upon final

acceptance of the Settlement Agreement

and Order, Toy Wonders, Inc. shall pay

to the Commission a civil penalty in the

amount of SEVENTY-FIVE THOUSAND

AND 00/100 DOLLARS ($75,000.00) in

three payments consisting of TWENTYFIVE THOUSAND AND 00/100

DOLLARS ($25,000.00) each. The first

payment of TWENTY-FIVE THOUSAND

AND 00/100 DOLLARS ($25,000.00)

shall be due within twenty (20) days

after service of the Final Order

accepting the Settlement Agreement and

Order (hereinafter, the anniversary

date). The second payment of TWENTYFIVE THOUSAND AND 00/100

DOLLARS ($25,000.00) shall be paid

within one year of the anniversary date.

The third payment of TWENTY-FIVE

THOUSAND AND 00/100 DOLLARS

($25,000.00) shall be paid within two

years of the anniversary date. Payment

of the full amount of the civil penalty

shall settle fully the staff’s allegations

set forth in paragraphs 5 through 14 of

the Settlement Agreement and Order

that Toy Wonders, Inc. violated the

FHSA. Upon failure by Toy Wonders,

Inc. to make payment or upon the

making of a late payment by Toy

Wonders, Inc. (a) The entire amount of

the civil penalty shall be due and

payable, and (b) interest on the

outstanding balance shall accrue and be

paid at the federal legal rate of interest

under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 1961

(a) and (b).

Provisionally accepted and Provisional

Order issued on the 3rd day of April, 1995.

By order of the Commission.

Sadye E. Dunn,

Secretary, Consumer Product Safety

Commission.

[FR Doc. 95–8521 Filed 4–6–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6355–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force

Notification of Proposed Terminations

or Substantial Reductions of Major

Defense Programs

Section 4471 of the FY93 Defense

Authorization Act, as amended by

section 1372 of the FY94 Defense

Authorization Act and section 1142 of

the FY95 Defense Authorization Act,

requires that each prime contractor

under a major defense program be

notified if the program is proposed for

substantial reductions or terminations

as forwarded to Congress in the

Presidents Budget.

The following Air Force prime

contractor is hereby notified the

program listed below has been proposed

to be terminated by the Fiscal Year 96

President’s budget:
17780 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 67 / Friday, April 7, 1995 / Notices

Program Prime Contractor Contract No.

EF–111A System Improvement Program ........................... Grumman Aerospace Corporation, 609 South Oyster Bay

Rd Bethpage, NY 11714–3582.

F33657–90–C–0001

Note: This is not a notice of termination,

but a notice of proposed termination that was

submitted in the FY96 President Budget to

Congress.

The Air Force point of contact for this

notice is Maj Pete Knudsen. He can be

contacted at (703)695–2656.

Patsy J. Conner,

Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 95–8586 Filed 4–6–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3910–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

National Advisory Committee on

Institutional Quality and Integrity;

Meeting

AGENCY: National Advisory Committee

on Institutional Quality and Integrity,

Education.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the

proposed agenda of the National

Advisory Committee on Institutional

Quality and Integrity. Notice of this

meeting is required under section

10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory

Committee Act. This document is

intended to notify the general public of

its opportunity to attend this public

meeting.

DATES AND TIMES: May 24–26, 1995, 8:00

a.m. until 5:00 p.m.

ADDRESS: The Dupont Plaza Hotel, 1500

New Hampshire Avenue, NW.,

Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Carol F. Sperry, Executive Director,

National Advisory Committee on

Institutional Quality and Integrity, U.S.

Department of Education, 600

Independence Avenue, SW., room 3905,

ROB 3, Washington, DC 20202–7592.

Telephone: (202) 260–3636. Individuals

who use a telecommunications device

for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal

Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–

800–877–8339 between 8:00 a.m. and

8:00 p.m., Eastern time, Monday

through Friday.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

National Advisory Committee on

Institutional Quality and Integrity is

established under Section 1205 of the

Higher Education Act (HEA) as

amended by Public Law 102–325 (20

U.S.C. 1145). The Committee advises

the Secretary of Education with respect

to the establishment and enforcement of

the standards of accrediting agencies or

associations under subpart 2 of part H

of Title IV, HEA, the recognition of a

specific accrediting agency or

association, the preparation and

publication of the list of nationally

recognized accrediting agencies and

associations, the eligibility and

certification process for institutions of

higher education under Title IV, HEA,

and the functions of the Secretary under

subpart 1 part H of Title IV, HEA,

relating to the State Postsecondary

Review Program. The Committee also

develops and recommends to the

Secretary standards and criteria for

specific categories of vocational training

institutions and institutions of higher

education for which there are no

recognized accrediting agencies,

associations, or State agencies, in order

to establish eligibility for such

institutions on an interim basis for

participation in federally funded

programs.

Agenda

The meeting on May 24–26, 1995 is

open to the public. The Advisory

Committee will review petitions of

accrediting and State approval bodies

relative to initial or continued

recognition by the Secretary of

Education. It also will review a petition

by a Federal agency for bachelor’s

degree-granting authority. In addition,

the Committee will hear presentations

by representatives of these petitioning

agencies and any third parties who have

requested to be heard.

The following petitions are scheduled

for review:

Nationally Recognized Accrediting

Agencies and Associations

Petitions for Initial Recognition

1. American Academy for Liberal

Education (requested scope of

recognition: The accreditation and

preaccreditation of institutions and

programs in the liberal arts).

2. Montessori Accreditation Council

for Teacher Education (requested scope

of recognition: The accreditation of

institutions and programs for

Montessori teacher education).

Petitions for Renewal of Recognition

1. American Academy of

Microbiology, Committee on

Postdoctoral Educational Programs

(requested scope of recognition: The

accreditation of postdoctoral programs

in medical and public health laboratory

microbiology).

2. American Association for Marriage

and Family Therapy, Commission on

Accreditation for Marriage and Family

Education (requested scope of

recognition: The accreditation of

graduate degree programs and clinical

training programs in marriage and

family therapy education).

3. Accrediting Commission on

Education for Health Services

Administration (requested scope of

recognition: The accreditation of

graduate programs in health services

administration).

4. American Osteopathic Association,

Bureau of Professional Education

(requested scope of recognition: The

accreditation and preaccreditation of

programs leading to the D.O. degree).

5. American Podiatric Medical

Association, Council on Podiatric

Medical Education (requested scope of

recognition: The accreditation and

preaccreditation of colleges of podiatric

medicine, including first professional

and graduate degree programs).

6. Association of Theological Schools

in the United States and Canada,

Commission on Accrediting (requested

scope of recognition: The accreditation

and preaccreditation of freestanding

schools, as well as schools affiliated

with larger institutions, offering

graduate professional education for

ministry and graduate study of

theology).

7. Council on Naturopathic Medical

Education, Commission on

Accreditation (requested scope of

recognition: The accreditation and

preaccreditation of programs leading to

the N.D. or N.M.D. degree).

8. National Accrediting Commission

for Schools and Colleges of

Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine

(requested scope of recognition: The

accreditation of first professional

master’s degree and professional

master’s-level certificate and diploma

programs in acupuncture and oriental

medicine).

9. National Council for Accreditation

of Teacher Education (requested scope

of recognition: The accreditation of

professional education units that

provide baccalaureate and graduate

programs for the preparation of teachers

and other professional personnel for

elementary and secondary schools).

10. New York Board of Regents

(requested scope of recognition: The