14420 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 52 / Friday, March 17, 1995 / Notices

312–353–8326). Hearing-impaired

persons who will attend the meeting

and require the services of a sign

language interpreter should contact the

Regional Office at least five (5) working

days before the scheduled date of the

meeting.

The meeting will be conducted

pursuant to the provisions of the rules

and regulations of the Commission.

Dated at Washington, DC, March 7, 1995.

Carol-Lee Hurley,

Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.

[FR Doc. 95–6552 Filed 3–16–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6335–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Docket 8–95]

Foreign-Trade Zone 24—Pittston, PA;

Application for Subzone Status J.

Schoeneman, Inc., Plant (Wearing

Apparel), State Line, PA

An application has been submitted to

the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the

Board) by the Eastern Distribution

Center, Inc., grantee of FTZ 24,

requesting special-purpose subzone

status for the apparel manufacturing

plant of the J. Schoeneman, Inc. (JSI)

(subsidiary of the Plaid Clothing Group,

Inc.), located in State Line,

Pennsylvania. The application was

submitted pursuant to the provisions of

the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Act, as

amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), and the

regulations of the Board (15 CFR part

400). It was formally filed on March 10,

1995.

This application involves the

proposed transfer of subzone activity

from JSI’s plant (FTZ Subzone 99A) in

Wilmington, Delaware, to JSI’s new

Pennsylvania plant. Subzone status for

the company’s Wilmington plant was

authorized by the Board in 1984

(Subzone 99A; Board Order 257, 49 FR

24757, 6–15–84). The scope of FTZ

authority for Subzone 99A is limited to

non-manufacturing activity. JSI plans to

close the Wilmington facility in 1995

and transfer the activity to its new plant

in State Line, Pennsylvania. The activity

at the proposed subzone would be the

same as that now conducted at the

Delaware plant, and no expansion of

manufacturing authority is being

requested.

The new JSI plant (10 acres, 126,000

sq. ft) is located at 15276 Molly Pitcher

Highway (U.S. 11), State Line (Franklin

County), Pennsylvania, some 6 miles

north of Hagerstown, Maryland. The

facility (120 employees) will be used to

store, measure, and cut foreign and

domestic fabric into tailored garment

pieces that are shipped to other JSI

plants for assembly into finished

apparel (mens’ and boys’ suits, sport

coats, raincoats, and trousers). Fabrics

purchased from abroad (about 35% of

total) include wool, silk, polyester, and

polyester/wool (duty rates range up to

36.1%).

As is the case at the Delaware plant,

FTZ procedures would exempt JSI from

Customs duty payments on the foreign

status fabric that is reexported from the

proposed subzone. On domestic

production, JSI would be able to defer

duty payments on the foreign fabric

until it is formally entered for

consumption prior to cutting. No

manufacturing would be conducted

under FTZ procedures, and the same

restrictions that are contained in Board

Order 257 would apply at this plant.

The application indicates that the

savings from zone procedures will

continue to help maintain the

international competitiveness of JSI’s

domestic operations.

In accordance with the Board’s

regulations, a member of the FTZ Staff

has been appointed examiner to

investigate the application and report to

the Board.

Public comment on the application is

invited from interested parties.

Submissions (original and three copies)

shall be addressed to the Board’s

Executive Secretary at the address

below. The closing period for their

receipt is May 16, 1995. Rebuttal

comments in response to material

submitted during the foregoing period

may be submitted during the subsequent

15-day period (to May 31, 1995).

A copy of the application and the

accompanying exhibits will be available

for public inspection at each of the

following locations:

Office of the Port Director, U.S. Customs

Service, Harrisburg International

Airport, Building 135, Second Floor,

room 7, Middletown, PA 17057–5035

Office of the Executive Secretary,

Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S.

Department of Commerce, room 3716,

14th Street & Pennsylvania Avenue

NW., Washington, DC 20230

Dated: March 13, 1995.

John J. Da Ponte, Jr.,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–6680 Filed 3–16–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

International Trade Administration

[A–570–807]

Ceiling Fans From the People’s

Republic of China: Final Results of

Changed Circumstances Antidumping

Duty Administrative Review and

Revocation of Antidumping Duty Order

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of Final Results of

Changed Circumstances Antidumping

Duty Administrative Review and

Revocation of Antidumping Duty Order.

SUMMARY: On December 9, 1991, the

Department of Commerce (the

Department) published in the Federal

Register an antidumping duty order on

ceiling fans from the People’s Republic

of China (PRC). We are now revoking

the order, based on the fact that this

order is no longer of interest to domestic

parties.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 17, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Andrea Chu or Michael Rill, Office of

Antidumping Compliance, Import

Administration, International Trade

Administration, U.S. Department of

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution

Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230;

telephone (202) 482–4733.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

On December 9, 1991, the Department

published in the Federal Register (56

FR 64249) an antidumping duty order

on ceiling fans from the PRC (the order).

On September 27, 1994, Lasko Metal

Products, Inc. (Lasko), the petitioner in

this proceeding, submitted a request for

a changed circumstances administrative

review and revocation of the order on

the basis that the order no longer is of

interest to the petitioner. On October 14,

1994, Lasko reaffirmed its September

27, 1994, request for the revocation of

the order.

On January 17, 1995, the Department

published in the Federal Register a

notice of initiation and preliminary

results of changed circumstances review

to determine whether to revoke the

order. (See Ceiling Fans from the

People’s Republic of China: Termination

of Antidumping Duty Administrative

Review, Initiation and Preliminary

Results of Changed Circumstances

Antidumping Duty Administrative

Review, and Intent to Revoke Order, 60

FR 3390.) We found that Lasko’s

affirmative statement of no interest

constitutes good cause for conducting a

changed circumstances review. We gave