17504 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 66 / Thursday, April 6, 1995 / Proposed Rules

II. Public Comment Procedures

OSM is requesting public comment to

assist OSM in making its decision on

which approach to use in Colorado,

New Mexico, and Utah to implement

the underground coal mine performance

standards of section 720(a) of SMCRA,

the implementing Federal regulations,

and any counterpart State provisions.

A. Written Comments

Written comments should be specific,

pertain only to the issues addressed in

this notice, and include explanations in

support of the commenter’s

recommendations. Comments received

after the time indicated under DATES or

at locations other than the Albuquerque

Field Office will not necessarily be

considered in OSM’s final decision or

included in the Administrative Record.

B. Public Hearing

Persons wishing to speak at the public

hearing should contact the person listed

under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT by 4 p.m., mst on April 21,

1995. The location and time of the

hearing will be arranged with those

persons requesting the hearing. If no one

requests an opportunity to testify at the

public hearing, the hearing will not be

held.

Filing of a written statement at the

time of the hearing is requested as it

will greatly assist the transcriber.

Submission of written statements in

advance of the hearing will allow OSM

officials to prepare adequate responses

and appropriate questions.

The public hearing will continue on

the specified date until all persons

scheduled to speak have been heard.

Persons in the audience who have not

been scheduled to speak, and who wish

to do so, will be heard following those

who have been scheduled. The hearing

will end after all persons scheduled to

speak and persons present in the

audience who wish to speak have been

heard.

Any disabled individual who has

need for a special accommodation to

attend a public hearing should contact

the individual listed under FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT.

C. Public Meeting

If only a few persons request an

opportunity to speak at a hearing, a

public meeting, rather than a public

hearing, may be held. Persons wishing

to meet with OSM representatives to

discuss recommendations on how OSM

and Colorado, New Mexico, or Utah

should implement the provisions of

section 720(a) of SMCRA, the

implementing Federal regulations, and/

or the counterpart State provisions, may

request a meeting by contacting the

person listed under FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT. All such meetings

will be open to the public and, if

possible, notices of meetings will be

posted at the locations listed under

ADDRESSES. A written summary of each

meeting will be made a part of the

Administrative Record.

Dated: March 31, 1995.

Russell F. Price,

Acting Assistant Director, Western Support

Center.

[FR Doc. 95–8468 Filed 4–5–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–05–M

30 CFR Parts 915, 916, and 925

Iowa, Kansas, and Missouri Regulatory

Programs

AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining

Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM),

Interior.

ACTION: Announcement of public

comment period and opportunity for

public hearing.

SUMMARY: OSM is requesting public

comment that would be considered in

deciding how to implement in Iowa,

Kansas, and Missouri underground coal

mine subsidence control and water

replacement provisions of the Surface

Mining Control and Reclamation Act of

1977 (SMCRA), the implementing

Federal regulations, and/or the

counterpart State provisions. Recent

amendments to SMCRA and the

implementing Federal regulations

require that underground coal mining

operations conducted after October 24,

1992, promptly repair or compensate for

subsidence-caused material damage to

noncommercial buildings and to

occupied dwellings and related

structures. These provisions also require

such operations to promptly replace

drinking, domestic, and residential

water supplies that have been adversely

affected by underground coal mining.

OSM must decide if Iowa’s, Kansas’,

and Missouri’s regulatory programs

(hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Iowa,

Kansas, and Missouri programs’’)

currently have adequate counterpart

provisions in place to promptly

implement the recent amendments to

SMCRA and the Federal regulations.

After consultation with Iowa, Kansas,

and Missouri and consideration of

public comments, OSM will decide

whether initial enforcement in Iowa,

Kansas, and Missouri will be

accomplished through the State Program

amendment process or by State

enforcement, by interim direct OSM

enforcement, or by joint State and OSM

enforcement.

DATES: Written comments must be

received by 4:00 p.m., c.d.t. on May 8,

1995. If requested, OSM will hold a

public hearing on May 1, 1995,

concerning how the underground coal

mine subsidence control and water

replacement provisions of SMCRA and

the implementing Federal regulations,

or the counterpart State provisions,

should be implemented in Iowa, Kansas,

and Missouri. Requests to speak at the

hearing must be received by 4:00 p.m.,

c.d.t. on April 21, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Written comments and

requests to speak at the hearing should

be mailed or hand-delivered to Michael

C. Wolfrom, Acting Director, Kansas

City Field Office at the address listed

below.

Copies of the applicable parts of the

Iowa, Kansas, and Missouri programs,

SMCRA, the implementing Federal

regulations, information provided by

Iowa, Kansas, and Missouri concerning

their authority to implement State

counterparts to SMCRA and the

implementing Federal regulations, a

listing of any scheduled public hearings,

and all written comments received in

response to this document will be

available for public review at the

address listed below during normal

business hours, Monday through Friday,

excluding holidays.

Michael C. Wolfrom, Acting Director,

Kansas City Field Office, Office of

Surface Mining Reclamation and

Enforcement, 934 Wyandotte, Room

500, Kansas City, MO 64105, Telephone:

(816) 374–6405.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Michael C. Wolfrom, Acting Director,

Kansas City Field Office, Telephone:

(816) 374–6405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

A. The Energy Policy Act

Section 2504 of the Energy Policy Act

of 1992, Public Law 102–486. 106 Stat.

2776 (1992) added new section 720 to

SMCRA. Section 720(a)(1) requires that

all underground coal mining operations

promptly repair or compensate for

subsidence-caused material damage to

noncommercial buildings and to

occupied residential dwellings and

related structures. Repair of damage

includes rehabilitation, restoration, or

replacement of the structures identified

in section 720(a)(1), and compensation

must be provided to the owner in the

full amount of the reduction in value of

the damaged structures as a result of

subsidence. Section 720(a0(2) requires
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 66 / Thursday, April 6, 1995 / Proposed Rules 17505

prompt replacement of certain

identified water supplies if those

supplies have been adversely affected

by underground coal mining operations.

These provisions requiring prompt

repair or compensation for damage to

structures, and prompt replacement of

water supplies, went into effect upon

passage of the Energy Policy Act on

October 24, 1992. As a result,

underground coal mine permittees in

States with OSM-approved regulatory

programs are required to comply with

these provisions for operations

conducted after October 24, 1992.

B. The Federal Regulations

Implementing the Energy Policy Act

On March 31, 1995, OSM

promulgated regulations at 30 CFR part

817 to implement the performance

standards of sections 720(a) (1) and (2)

of SMCRA (60 FR 16722–16751).

30 CFR 817.121(c)(2) requires in part

that:

The permittee must promptly repair, or

compensate the owner for, material damage

resulting from subsidence caused to any noncommercial building or occupied residential

dwelling or structure related thereto that

existed at the time of mining. * * * The

requirements of this paragraph apply only to

subsidence-related damage caused by

underground mining activities conducted

after October 24, 1992.

30 CFR 817.41(j) requires in part that:

The permittee must promptly replace any

drinking, domestic or residential water

supply that is contaminated, diminished or

interrupted by underground mining activities

conducted after October 24, 1992, if the

affected well or spring was in existence

before the date the regulatory authority

received the permit application for the

activities causing the loss, contamination or

interruption.

30 CFR 843.25 provides that by July

31, 1995, OSM will decide, in

consultation with each State regulatory

authority with an approved program,

how enforcement of the new

requirements will be accomplished. As

discussed below, enforcement may be

accomplished through the 30 CFR Part

732 State program amendment process,

or by State, OSM, or joint State and

OSM enforcement of the requirements.

OSM will decide which of the following

enforcement approaches to pursue.

(1) State program amendment

process. If the State’s promulgation of

regulatory provisions that are

counterpart to 30 CFR 817.41(j) and

817.121(c)(2) is imminent, the number

and extent of underground mines that

have operated in the State since October

24, 1992, is low, the number of

complaints in the State concerning

section 720 of SMCRA is low, or the

State’s investigation of subsidencerelated complaints has been thorough

and complete so as to assure prompt

remedial action, then OSM could decide

not to directly enforce the Federal

provisions in the State. In this situation,

the State would enforce its State

statutory and regulatory provisions once

it has amended its program to be in

accordance with the revised SMCRA

and to be consistent with the revised

Federal regulations. This program

revision process, which is addressed in

the Federal regulations at 30 CFR part

732, is commonly referred to as the

State program amendment process.

(2) State enforcement. If the State

does not have any statutory or

regulatory provisions in place that

correspond to the requirements of the

Federal regulations at 30 CFR 817.41(j)

and 817.121(c)(2), then OSM would

enforce in their entirety 30 CFR

817.41(j) and 817.121(c)(2) for all

underground mining activities

conducted in the State after October 24,

1992.

(4) State and OSM enforcement. If

thee State has statutory or regulatory

provisions in place that correspond to

some but not all of the requirements of

the Federal regulations at 30 CFR

817.41(j) and 817.121(c)(2) and the State

has authority to implement its

provisions for all underground mining

activities conducted after October 24,

1992, then the State would enforce its

provisions for these operations. OSM

would then enforce those provisions of

30 CFR 817.41(j) and 817.121(c)(20 that

are not covered by the State provisions

for these operations.

If the State has statutory or regulatory

provisions in place that correspond to

some but not all of the requirements of

the Federal regulations at 30 CFR

817.41(j) and 817.121(c)(2) and if the

State’s authority to enforce its

provisions applies to operations

conducted on or after some date later

than October 24, 1992, the State would

enforce its provisions for these

operations on and after the provisions’

effective date. OSM would then enforce

30 CFR 817.41(j) and 817.121(c)(2) to

the extent the State statutory and

regulatory provisions do not include

corresponding provisions applicable to

all underground mining activities

conducted after October 24, 1992; and

OSM would enforce those provisions of

30 CFR 817.41(j) and 817.121(c)(2) that

are included in the State program but

are not enforceable back to October 24,

1992, for the time period from October

24, 1992, until the effective date of the

State’s rules.

As described in item numbers (3) and

(4) above, OSM would directly enforce

in total or in part its Federal statutory

or regulatory provisions until the State

adopts and OSM approves, under 30

CFR part 732, the State’s counterparts to

the required provisions. However, as

discussed in item number (1) above,

OSM could decide not to initiate direct

Federal enforcement and rely instead on

the 30 CFR Part 732 State program

amendment process.

In those situations where OSM

determined that direct Federal

enforcement was necessary, the ten-day

notice provisions of 30 CFR 843.12(a)(2)

would not apply. That is, when on the

basis of a Federal inspection OSM

determined that a violation of 30 CFR

817.41(j) or 817.121(c)(2) existed, OSM

would issue a notice of violation or

cessation order without first sending a

ten-day notice to the State.

Also under direct Federal

enforcement, the provisions of 30 CFR

817.121(c)(4) would apply. This

regulation states that if damage to any

noncommercial building or occupied

residential dwelling or structure related

thereto occurs as a result of earth

movement within an area determined by

projecting a specified angle of draw

from the outermost boundary of any

underground mine workings to the

surface of the land (normally a 30

degree angle of draw), a rebuttable

presumption exists that the permittee

caused the damage.

Lastly, under direct Federal

enforcement, OSM would also enforce

the new definitions at 30 CFR 701.5 of

‘‘drinking, domestic or residential water

supply,’’ ‘‘material damage,’’ ‘‘noncommercial building,’’ ‘‘occupied

dwelling and structures related thereto,’’

and ‘‘replacement of water supply’’ that

were adopted with the new

underground mining performance

standards.

OSM would enforce 30 CFR 817.41(j),

817.121(c) (2) and (4), and 30 CFR 701.5

for operations conducted after October

24, 1992.

C. Enforcement in Iowa

By letter to Iowa dated December 14,

1994, OSM requested information from

Iowa that would help OSM decide

which approach to take in Iowa to

implement the requirements of section

720(a) of SMCRA, the implementing

Federal regulations, and/or the

counterpart Iowa program requirements

(Administrative Record No. IA–413). As

of March 21, 1995, Iowa had not

responded to OSM’s request.

OSM has determined that no

underground coal mines were operating

in Iowa after October 24, 1992.

OSM’s review of Iowa’s program

indicates that Iowa has not revised its
17506 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 66 / Thursday, April 6, 1995 / Proposed Rules

statute to incorporate counterparts to

the requirements of section 720 of

SMCRA. Also OSM’s review indicates

that (1) at Iowa Administrative Code

(IAC) 27–40.64(207), Iowa incorporated

30 CFR 817.41 as it existed on July 1,

1992, and (2) at IAC 27–40.64(6), Iowa

incorporated 30 CFR 817.121(c)(2) as it

existed on July 1, 1992, except the

phrase ‘‘To the extent required under

applicable provisions of State law.’’

D. Enforcement in Kansas

By letter to Kansas dated December

14, 1994, OSM requested information

from Kansas that would help OSM

decide which approach to take in

Kansas to implement the requirements

of section 720(a) of SMCRA, the

implementing Federal regulations, and/

or the counterpart Kansas program

requirements (Administrative Record

No. KS–594). By letter dated February 3,

1995, Kansas responded to OSM’s

request (Administrative Record No. KS–

595).

Kansas stated that no underground

coal mines were operating in Kansas

after October 24, 1992.

Kansas indicated that at Kansas

Administrative Regulations (KAR) 47–

9–1(d)(40), it adopted 30 CFR 817.121 as

it existed on July 1, 1990, and is in the

process of promulgating regulations

adopting 30 CFR 817.121 as it was

written on July 1, 1992. Kansas stated

that this revised regulation will

authorize the repair of structural

damage caused by subsidence in

accordance with section 720(a)(1) of

SMCRA as it existed on December 31,

1993.

Kansas further indicated that it has

the authority to investigate complaints

concerning water loss through the

material damage criteria of KAR 47–9–

1(d)(40, which adopts by reference 30

CFR 817.121(a), and through its

hydrologic balance regulations at KAR

47–9–1(d)(7), which adopts by reference

30 CFR 817.41. It further stated that any

drinking domestic, or residential water

supply, or other beneficial use as

defined by the Kansas Water

Appropriations Act, which is impaired

by diversion or is otherwise impaired,

would have to be replaced according to

Kansas Statutes Annotated (KSA) 82a–

706b. Lastly, Kansas stated that any

waters of the state whose quality is

adversely impacted will have to be

cleaned up at the owner’s expense as

provided for in KSA 65–171 et seq.

Kansas concluded that the abovediscussed regulations and statutes

adequately encompass the requirements

of section 720(a) of SMCRA.

E. Enforcement in Missouri

By letter to Missouri dated December

14, 1994, OSM requested information

from Missouri that would help OSM

decide which approach to take in

Missouri to implement the requirements

of section 720(a) of SMCRA, the

implementing Federal regulations, and/

or the counterpart Missouri program

provisions (Administrative Record No.

MO–619. By letter dated February 16,

1995, Missouri responded to OSM’s

request (Administrative Record No.

MO–620).

OSM determined that no underground

coal mines were operating in Missouri

after October 24, 1992.

Missouri stated that the subsidence

plan permitting requirements at 10

Missouri Code of State Regulations

(CSR) 40–6.120(11) and the performance

standards for subsidence control at 10

CSR 40–3.280 generally correspond to

the requirements of section 720(a)(1) of

SMCRA. In these regulations, Missouri

requires the permit applicant to submit

a plan detailing steps to prevent

subsidence damage or mitigate effects of

that damage to ‘‘structure or renewable

resource lands.’’ Missouri interprets

‘‘structures to broadly mean any

building, whether occupied or

unoccupied, and it defines ‘‘renewable

resource lands’’ as ‘‘aquifers and areas

for the recharge of aquifers and other

underground waters, areas for

agricultural or silviculture production

for food and fiber, and grazing lands.’’

Missouri also stated that the

underground mining permit

requirements for alternate water supply

at 10 CSR 40–6.110(8) and protection of

hydrologic balance requirements at 10

CSR 40–6.120(5)(b)3., together with the

performance requirements for water

rights replacement at 10 CSR 40–

3.200(14), generally correspond to

section 720(a)(2) of SMCRA.

Missouri indicated that all of the

above-discussed regulations have

effective dates preceding October 24,

1992, and appear to provide Missouri

authority to enforce the provisions of

section 720 of SMCRA.

II. Public Comment Procedures

OSM is requesting public comment to

assist OSM in making its decision on

which approach to use in Iowa, Kansas,

and Missouri to implement the

underground coal mine performance

standards of section 720(a) of SMCRA,

the implementing Federal regulations,

and any counterpart State provisions.

A. Written Comments

Written comments should be specific,

pertain only to the issues addressed in

this notice, and include explanations in

support of the commenter’s

recommendations. Comments received

after the time indicated under DATES or

at locations other than the Kansas City

Field Office will not necessarily be

considered in OSM’s final decision or

included in the Administrative Record.

B. Public Hearing

Persons wishing to speak at the public

hearing should contact the person listed

under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT by 4:00 p.m., c.d.t. on April 21,

1995. The location and time of the

hearing will be arranged with those

persons requesting the hearing. If no one

requests an opportunity to testify at the

public hearing, the hearing will not be

held.

Filing of a written statement at the

time of the hearing is requested as it

will greatly assist the transcriber.

Submission of written statements in

advance of the hearing will allow OSM

officials to prepare adequate responses

and appropriate questions.

The public hearing will continue on

the specified date until all persons

scheduled to speak have been heard.

Persons in the audience who have not

been scheduled to speak, and who wish

to do so, will be heard following those

who have been scheduled. The hearing

will end after all persons scheduled to

speak and persons present in the

audience who wish to speak have been

heard.

Any disabled individual who has

need for a special accommodation to

attend a public hearing should contact

the individual listed under FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT.

C. Public Meeting

If only a few persons request an

opportunity to speak at a hearing, a

public meeting, rather than a public

hearing, may be held. Persons wishing

to meet with OSM representatives to

discuss recommendations on how OSM

and Iowa, Kansas, and Missouri should

implement the provisions of section

720(a) of SMCRA, the implementing

Federal regulations, and/or the

counterpart State provisions, may

request a meeting by contacting the

person listed under FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT. All such meetings

will be open to the public and, if

possible, notices of meetings will be

posted at the locations listed under

ADDRESSES. A written summary of each

meeting will be made a part of the

Administrative Record.
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 66 / Thursday, April 6, 1995 / Proposed Rules 17507

1Copies may be obtained from the Deputy

Director for Finance, Defense Finance and

Accounting Service, 1931 Jefferson Davis Highway,

Arlington, Virginia 22240–5291, Attention: Military

Pay Directorate.

Dated: March 31, 1995.

Russell F. Price,

Acting Assistant Director, Western Support

Center.

[FR Doc. 95–8466 Filed 4–5–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–05–M

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

32 CFR Part 63

Former Spouse Payments From

Retired Pay

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary of

Defense, DoD.

ACTION: Proposed rule; amendment.

SUMMARY: This proposed rule amends

part 63 of title 32 of the Code of Federal

Regulations to reflect amendments to

the Uniformed Services Former

Spouses’ Protection Act and to clarify

the language in § 63.6(c)(8) concerning

court orders that provide for a division

of retired pay by means of a formula.

Guidance implementing the

amendments have been incorporated

into Volume 7, Part B of the DoD

Financial Management Regulation, DoD

7000.14–R, but has not been previously

published in the Federal Register.

DATES: Comments must be received June

6, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Interested parties should

submit written comments to: Deputy

Director for Finance, Defense Finance

and Accounting Service, 1931 Jefferson

Davis Highway, Arlington, VA 22240–

5291, Attention: Military Pay

Directorate.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.

Fiti Malufau, (703) 602–5279.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Because of

the large number of comments

anticipated, we do not plan to

acknowledge or respond to individual

comments but will address the

comments, as appropriate, in the

preamble of the final rule.

To avoid undue hardship on those

seeking to enforce support orders

providing for a division of retired pay,

the Department of Defense will continue

to follow its current implementing

guidance with regard to the

amendments to the Uniformed Services

Former Spouses’ Protection Act and,

effective April 1, 1995, will accept court

orders containing formulas that are

consistent with the proposed rule until

a final rule is issued.

Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory

Planning and Review’’

The Under Secretary of Defense

(Comptroller) has determined that 32

CFR part 63 is not a significant

regulatory action. The rule does not:

(1) Have an annual effect on the

economy of $100 million or more or

adversely affect in a material way the

economy, a sector of the economy,

productivity, competition, jobs, the

environment, public health or safety, or

State, local, or tribal governments or

communities;

(2) Create a serious inconsistency or

otherwise interfere with an action taken

or planned by another agency;

(3) Materially alter the budgetary

impact of entitlements, grants, user fees,

or loan programs or the rights and

obligations of recipients thereof; or

(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues

arising out of legal mandates, the

President’s priorities, or the principles

set forth in this Executive Order.

Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory

Flexibility Act of 1980’’ (5 U.S.C. 601–

612)

The Under Secretary of Defense

(Comptroller) has certified that this rule

is not subject to the Regulatory

Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612)

because it affects only certain military

members and their former spouses.

Public Law 96–511, ‘‘Paperwork

Reduction Act’’ (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520)

The Under Secretary of Defense

(Comptroller) has certified that this

amendment of 32 CFR part 63 does not

impose any new reporting or

recordkeeping requirements under the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44

U.S.C. 3501–3520).

List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 63

Alimony, Child support, Retirement,

Uniformed Services, Payments to former

spouses, Military retired pay.

Accordingly, 32 CFR part 63 is

proposed to be amended as follows:

PART 63—FORMER SPOUSE

PAYMENTS FROM RETIRED PAY

1. The authority citation for part 63

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 10 USC 1408.

2. Section 63.6 is proposed to be

amended by adding the word ‘‘certified’’

after the word ‘‘A’’ in paragraph

(b)(1)(ii), by revising paragraphs (b)(5),

(c)(8) and (e), and by adding a new

paragraph (h)(13) to read as follows:

§ 63.6 Procedures.

* * * * *

(b) * * *

(5) The designated agent for each

uniformed service is:

(i) Army, Navy, Air Force and Marine

Corps: Defense Finance and Accounting

Service, Cleveland Center (Code LF), PO

Box 998002, Cleveland, OH 44199–

8002.

(ii) Coast Guard: United States Coast

Guard, Commanding Officer (L), Pay

and Personnel Center, 444 Quincy

Street, Topeka, KS 66683–3591.

(iii) Public Health Service: Office of

General Counsel, Department of Health

and Human Service, Room 5362, 330

Independence Avenue, SW,

Washington, DC 20201.

* * * * *

(c) * * *

(8) The court order shall require

payment of child support or alimony or,

in the case of a division of property,

provide for the payment of an amount

of disposable retired or retainer pay,

expressed as a dollar amount or as a

percentage. Court orders specifying a

percentage or fraction of disposable

retired pay shall be construed as a

percentage or a fraction of disposable

retired pay. A court order that provides

for a division of retired pay by means

of a formula wherein the elements of the

formula are not specifically set forth or

readily apparent on the face of the court

order will not be honored unless

clarified by the court. For orders served

on or after April 1, 1995, an exception

to requiring such a clarifying order will

be made only if in accordance with

(c)(8) (i), (ii) and (iii) of this section:

(i) The order otherwise qualifies for

direct payment but the parties are

divorced when the member is on active

duty. In that situation, where the

pertinent court order is expressed in

terms of a formula and the element

missing from that formula is the

member’s years of service, then the

designated agent will supply the

member’s years of service in terms of

whole months to arrive at a percentage

of disposable pay due the former

spouse. Partial months of service will be

dropped. The member’s service that is

creditable for retirement percentage

multiplier purposes (See Chapter 1,

Section C of DoD Financial Management

Regulation, DoD 7000.14–R, Volume 7,

Part B1) will be used in all formulas. In

the case of reserve members, points

earned during the member’s marriage

must be contained in the court order.

The designated agent will supply total

retirement points earned by a reservist