alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered October 9, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-01069-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.C.M., A MINOR CHILD

On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-12-19569-Z

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant Justin Ray Monroe’s October 8, 2015 Motion to Compel the 

District Court Reporter to Prepare and File the Reporters Record and Provide a Copy to the 

Petitioner. The reporter’s record is past due in the above referenced cause. The record reflects 

appellant Justin Ray Monroe is indigent and entitled to proceed without payment of costs. 

Because this is a parental termination case, we remind both Judge David Lopez and Court 

Reporter Glenda Johnson that it is the responsibility of the Court Reporter to prepare, certify, and 

timely file the reporter’s record and that Judge Lopez must direct Ms. Johnson to immediately 

commence the preparation of the reporter’s record. Judge Lopez must arrange a substitute 

reporter if necessary. TEX. R. APP. P. 28.4(b)(1).

We ORDER Glenda Johnson, Official Court Reporter for the 256th Judicial District 

Court, to file the reporter’s record with this Court within TEN (10) DAYS of the date of this 

Order. TEX. R. APP. P. 35.5. 
We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send copies of this order, by electronic 

transmission, to the following persons:

Honorable David Lopez

Presiding Judge of the 256th Judicial District Court

Glenda Johnson

Official Court Reporter, 256th Judicial District Court

After the reporter’s record is filed, we DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of 

the reporter’s record in paper format to Justin Ray Monroe, Sanders Estes Unit, TDCJ 

#01856907, 1100 Hwy 1807, Venus, TX, 76084.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

PRESIDING JUSTICE
Exhibit
32.2
 
 Certification of Principal
Financial Officer
 Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
 Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report of JayHawk Energy, Inc., (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Thomas G. Ryman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
  /s/
      Thomas G. RymanThomas
      G. Ryman
                          Chief Financial Officer
                        August
      12, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet and the consolidated statement of operations as filed
as part of the annual report on Form 10-K and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           NOV-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                NOV-7-1998
<CASH>                                           3,623
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,479
<ALLOWANCES>                                       237
<INVENTORY>                                     74,167
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               111,555
<PP&E>                                          85,254
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,574
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 177,075
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           50,422
<BONDS>                                         46,036
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            98
<OTHER-SE>                                      59,373
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   177,075
<SALES>                                        253,842
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               256,548
<CGS>                                          192,764
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   62,118
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,229
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   118
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,816
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (28,497)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,762)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (25,735)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (27,851)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.82)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.82)
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6240
EHYIN MOHAMOD YOUSSEF, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JERRY MONETT; MAJOR BUNDY; CAPTAIN BROWN, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-95-93-5-CT-H) Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 5, 1996 Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ehyin Mohamod Youssef, Appellant Pro Se. Trawick Hamilton Stubbs, Jr., James M. Ayers, II, STUBBS, PERDUE & WHEELER, New Bern, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Youssef v. Monett , No. CA-95-93-5-CT-H (E.D.N.C. Feb. 1, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 61 (Thursday, March 30, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16515-16516]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7755]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD


Agency Forms Submitted for OMB Review

    Summary: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Railroad [[Page 16516]] Retirement Board has 
submitted the following proposal(s) for the collection of information 
to the Office of Management and Budget for review and approval.

Summary of Proposal(s)

(1) Collection title: Repayment of Debt
(2) Form(s) submitted: ID-22, G-145
(3) OMB Number: 3220-0165
(4) Expiration date of current OMB clearance: May 31, 1995
(5) Type of request: Revision of a currently approved collection
(6) Respondents: Individuals or households
(7) Estimated annual; number of respondents: 125
(8) Total annual responses: 125
(9) Total annual reporting hours: 6
(10) Collection description: Section 2 of the Railroad Unemployment 
Insurance Act (RUIA) provides unemployment and sickness benefits for 
qualified railroad workers. When the RRB determines that an overpayment 
of RUIA benefits has occurred, it initiates action to notify the 
claimant and to recover the amount owned the RRB. The collection 
obtains information needed by the RRB to allow for the repayment of the 
amount owed by the claimant by credit card, in addition to the 
customary form of payment by check or money order.

    Additional Information or Comments: Copies of the form and 
supporting documents can be obtained from Chuck Mierzwa, the agency 
clearance officer (312-751-3363). Comments regarding the information 
collection should be addressed to Ronald J. Hodapp, Railroad Retirement 
Board, 844 North Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611-2092 and the OMB 
receiver, Laura Oliven (202-395-7316), Office of Management and Budget, 
Room 10230, New Executive Office Building, Washington, D.C. 20503.
Chuck Mierzwa,
Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-7755 Filed 3-29-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7905-01-M
2011 Executive Bonus Plan



 Exhibit 10.2 

2011 EXECUTIVE BONUS PLAN 
 July 6, 2011 
 The Executive Bonus Plan shall cover Named Executive Officers (NEOs) of
the Company. The bonus plan shall be comprised of three components with the corresponding bonus weighting: 
  

					
	 Bonus Component:
	  	Bonus Weighting:	 
	 Adjusted EBITDA
	  	 	Up to 50	% 
	 Performance Objectives
	  	 	35	% 
	 Capital Efficiency
	  	 	15	%
		  	 	 	 
	 Total
	  	 	100	% 
		  	 	 	 

 Adjusted EBITDA: 
 Each NEO shall have a target of 25% of his or her annual bonus tied to business performance as measured by Adjusted EBITDA for the second half of the year (as set forth on Schedule I attached hereto).
However, in its discretion, the Board shall have the right to increase this percentage up to 50% of their annual bonus based on the final Adjusted EBITDA taking multiple factors into consideration including, but not limited to, the 2011 budget,
performance as compared to prior year, historical trends, competitive pressures, marketplace dynamics and any unusual one-time items. 
 The
bonus award of the CFO shall be tied to the performance of the Company, while bonus awards for Division Presidents shall be based on a 70%/30% split of divisional/corporate results. 







 Performance Objectives: 
 Each NEO shall have 35% of his or her annual bonus tied to the achievement of specific performance objectives agreed to in advance by the CEO and the NEO. In its discretion, the Board shall determine the
Performance Objective bonus award based upon achievement of these objectives. 
 Capital Efficiency: 

Each NEO shall have 15% of his or her annual performance bonus tied to performance related to capital efficiency. In its discretion, the Board shall
determine the Capital Efficiency bonus award taking into consideration the 2011 capital budget, the timeliness and efficiency of product launches, the management of maintenance capital, sources of any cost overruns/underruns and any changes in
corporate strategy impacting capital spend.
Exhibit 4.1


 




	
  

  	
  COMMON COMMON
  INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS CUSIP 749607 10 7 RLI
  CORP. THIS CERTIFIES THAT SPECIMEN SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS FULLY
  PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK,OF THE PAR VALUE OF $I EACH,
  OF CERTIFICATE OF STOCK RLI transfer of which is registrable in the records
  of the Corporation upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed by
  the appropriate person or persons. This certificate and the shares
  represented hereby are issued and shall be subject to all of the provisions
  of the Articles of Incorporation, and By Laws of the Corporation, each as
  from time to time amended which are hereby made a part hereof and to all of
  which the holder by acceptance hereof assents. This certificate is not valid,
  unless counter signed by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar.
  Witness the facsimile seal, of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures
  of its duly authorized officers. Dated CORPORATE SECRETARY PRESIDENT WELLS FARGO
  BANK, N.A. TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE A 0777 NUMBER ZQ
  IS THE OWNER OF Corp., © SECURITY-COLUMBIAN UNITED STATES BANKNOTE
  CORPORATION BY SHARES

  






 















	
  

  	
  The following
  abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall
  be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable
  laws or regulations: TEN COM – as tenants in common TEN ENT –as tenants by
  the entireties JT TEN– as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as
  tenants in common UNIF GIFT MIN ACT– Custodian (Cust) (Minor) under Uniform
  Gifts to Minors Act (State) Additional abbreviations may also be used though
  not in the above list. For Value Received, hereby sell, assign and transfer
  unto PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE
  (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE)
  Shares of the capital stock represented by the within Certificate, and do
  hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint Attorney to transfer the said stock
  on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution
  in the premises. Dated 

  THE SIGNATURE
  TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF
  NOTICE: THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR
  ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER Signature(s) Guaranteed By THE SIGNATURE(S)
  MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS,
  SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN
  APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM). PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE
  17Ad-15.
Organization Name:

Note: Representatives submitting on behalf of an organization must enter information below.

Requestor Representative:

Section 301 Investigation: China's Acts, Policies, and Practices Related to Technology 

Transfer, Intellectual Property, and Innovation - Form to Request Exclusion of Product

When submitting a product exclusion request using this form, enter the specified 

information in the following fields and explain the basis and rationale for your statements. 

By completing this form, you certify that the information provided is complete and 

correct to the best of your knowledge. 

1. Indicate whether the comment contains business confidential information (BCI), is a public

document, or is a public version of a BCI document.

3.

2. Please provide a complete and detailed description of the product of concern:

4.

5. Requestor's relationship to the product:

CONTINUED BELOW

*

10-digit HTSUS item number* for product you wish to address in this product exclusion request:

Use numerical characters only with no special characters (example: 1023456789). For help in finding 

the HTSUS item number associated with your product, see https://hts.usitc.gov/

1

7.

6. Does this submission in regulations.gov include additional attachments?

Please indicate whether any additional attachment contains business confidential

information (BCI), is a public document, or is a public version of a BCI document.

VERSION 1

Requestor Information

Requestor Name (Last, First):

Public Version of BCI

XA11G, Air Driven Hydraulic Pump, 3/3 Valve, 61 in3 Usable Oil, Integrated Pressure Gauge, For use 

with Single-Acting Cylinder or Tool; Maximum Operating Pressure psi: 10000; Weight Lbs: 19.4; 30 - 

120: 30 - 125; Hydraulic Pump Hydraulic to Air Ratio: 

8413500070 Schmidt, Jackie Enerpac Jackie SchmidtImporter Yes Contains BCI
END 2

8. Is this product, or a comparable product, available from sources in the United States?:

VERSION 1

11. Please provide information in support your request, taking account of the instructions

provided in Section B of the Federal Register notice (note: text entered below can extend

beyond the apparent size of this box).

9. Is this product, or a comparable product, available from sources in third countries?:

10. Please provide the value and quantity (with units) of the Chinese-origin product of concern

that you purchased for each calendar year specified. Limit this figure to the products

purchased by your firm (or by members of your trade association) alone. Please provide 

estimates if precise figures are unavailable.

2016 Value:

2015 Value:

2017 Value:

2016 Quantity:

2015 Quantity:

2017 Quantity:

No No BCI BCI BCI BCI BCI BCI

See addendum for additional information.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4467

Valmet, Inc: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5152

Radio Systems Corp:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_5-30-2019.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JU NE 2 1, 2016

NO. 03

- 14

- 00323

- CV

Roger Bufler and Sandy Bufler, Appellant s

v.

Apeck Construction, LLC, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 51ST DISTRICT COURT OF COKE COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES P URYEAR, BOURLAND, AN D SHANNON *

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE SHANNON

This is an appeal from the order signed by the tr i a l court on April 25, 2014. Having reviewed the

record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error in the trial

court’s order . Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s order

. The appellant s shall pay all

costs relat ing to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.

* Before Bob E. Shannon, Chief Justice (retired), Third Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment.

See Tex. Gov’t Code § 74.003(b).
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Craig McCullen, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Counsel’s application to withdraw granted *(see, People v Crawford,*71 AD2d 38). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolfgang, J.—attempted burglary, third degree.) Present—Boomer, J. P., Green, Pine, Davis and Lowery, JJ.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-5744

Alo USA Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3484

Guardian USA LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel