alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Jarden Corporation (the Company) for
the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James E. Lillie, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ James E. Lillie    
|James E. Lillie        
|Chief Executive Officer
|January 18, 2012       

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Jarden Corporation (the
Company) for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ian G.H. Ashken, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Ian G.H. Ashken    
|Ian G.H. Ashken        
|Chief Financial Officer
|January 18, 2012
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4911

Scosche Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

August 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5261

David C. Poole Company:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.47
================================================================================
[LOGO OF BANK OF AMERICA]                                 AMENDMENT TO DOCUMENTS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                  AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO BUSINESS LOAN AGREEMENT


     This Amendment No. 3 (the "Amendment") dated as of August 25, 1997, is 
                                                        ---------
between BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION (the "Bank") and 
ST. JOHN KNITS, INC. (the "Borrower").


                                   RECITALS
                                   --------

     A.  The Bank and the Borrower entered into a certain Business Loan 
Agreement dated as of December 15, 1995, as previously amended (the 
"Agreement").

     B.  The Bank and the Borrower desire to further amend the Agreement.


                                   AGREEMENT
                                   ---------

     1.  DEFINITIONS.  Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Amendment 
         -----------
shall have the meaning given to them in the Agreement.

     2.  AMENDMENTS.  The Agreement is hereby amended as follows:
         ----------

         2.1  Paragraph 7.2(b) of the Agreement is deleted in its entirety.

     3.  EFFECT OF AMENDMENT.  Except as provided in this Amendment, all of the 
         -------------------
terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

         This Amendment is executed as of the date stated at the beginning of 
this Amendment.



BANK OF AMERICA
NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION              ST. JOHN KNITS, INC.



X /s/ ARTHUR P. CARTER                              X /s/ ROGER G. RUPPERT
  --------------------                                --------------------
BY: ARTHUR P. CARTER                                BY: ROGER G. RUPPERT
TITLE: VICE PRESIDENT                               TITLE: SENIOR VICE 
                                                           PRESIDENT-FINANCE
                                                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
                                                           OFFICER
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AmendL (10/92)                                                     015834-40119
                                      -1-
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4000

Cummins Allison Corp:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
<PAGE>

Exhibit 10.37

                                  AMENDMENT TO
                           FORBEARANCE AND STIPULATED
                        CONFESSION OF JUDGMENT AGREEMENT

         This Amendment to Forbearance and Stipulated Confession of Judgment
Agreement (:Agreement") made and entered into as of January 31, 2003, by and
between Ryer Industries, LLC, a Delaware limited liability Company ("Borrower")
and Planet Polymer Technologies, Inc., a California corporation ("Lender");

WHEREAS, the Borrower and the Lender have heretofore executed a certain
Forbearance and Stipulated Confession of Judgment Agreement ("Agreement") as of
October 25, 2002; and

         WHEREAS, the Borrower and the Lender desire to amend said Agreement;

         NOW THEREFORE, the Borrower and the Lender hereby amend said agreement
to set forth the payments to be made by Borrower to Lender after January 31,
2003 by deleting the dates and amounts set forth in Section 2 of said Agreement
and substituting the following:

<TABLE>
<S>          <C>
2-01-03      $20,000
3-01-03      $20,000
4-01-03      $20,000
5-01-03      $20,000
6-01-03      $20,000
7-01-03      $20,000
</TABLE>

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as
of the ____, day of January, 2003.

BORROWER:                                  LENDER:

Ryer Industries, LLC,                      Planet Polymer Technologies, Inc.,
a Delaware limited liability company       a California corporation

By: _____________________________          By: _________________________________

Its: Manager                               Its: ________________________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             755
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,307
<ALLOWANCES>                                       406
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,175
<PP&E>                                           1,414
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,757
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  26,178
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,918
<BONDS>                                            306
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            63
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,487
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    26,178
<SALES>                                         27,867
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,867
<CGS>                                           12,556
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,920
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   364
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   403
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,050
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    163
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (14)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                177
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (217)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-08837,333-33231, 333-36071, 333-57488, 333-90104, 333-116341, 33-84116, 33-84118, 33-84120, 33-84122 and 33-84124), S-3 (File Nos. 333-77399, 333-90102, 333-58110, 333-116342 and 333-123579) and S-3/A (File Nos. 333-58110, 333-116342 and 333-123579) ofGateway, Inc. of our report dated January 30, 2004, except for Note 12 which is as of December 15, 2004, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

 

San Diego, California 

March 14, 2006
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charles Allen, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Browne, J.), rendered November 2, 1988, convicting him of conspiracy in the fourth degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, without a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony should not have been denied without a hearing. We find his argument to be without merit.

Concededly, the defendant was arrested by a police backup team within 15 minutes and two blocks of the narcotics transaction. Thereafter, the undercover officer viewed the defendant on the street, also within two blocks of the scene of the sale and approximately 20 minutes after defendant’s arrest. We find the confirmatory viewing of the defendant by the undercover officer was made in close spatial and temporal proximity to the crime, not for identification purposes but to confirm that the proper person had been arrested. As a prompt on- or near-the-scene confirmatory viewing, it was not an identification procedure which warranted a *Wade*hearing *(see, People v Thompson,*149 AD2d 634, 635; *People v Francis,*139 AD2d 527; *People v Erazo,*134 AD2d 610; *People v Marrero,*110 AD2d 785; *People v Morales,*37 NY2d 262).

The People gratuitously served the defendant pursuant to CPL 710.30, with a notice of intention to offer the at-the-scene identification testimony at the trial. That does not change the character of the confirmatory viewing to a pretrial identification procedure subject to a *Wade*hearing *(see, People v Mc-Clane,*149 AD2d 536; *People v Suren,*131 AD2d 896).

We have examined the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Kunzeman, Harwood and Miller, JJ., concur.
PUBLIC VERSION
$[*********] [******]

$[*********]

INPUT

20.0

$[*********]

[******]

[******]

0.05

PUBLIC VERSION
Consistent with USTR's Section 301 notice, OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. requests

confidential treatment for the information designated as business confidential in this submission. Such

information consists of information that would not customarily be released to the public, including

business or trade secrets regarding production costs and processes, data on sales, product characteristics

customers, destinations, and other product, sales, and cost-related business secrets. Business confidential

information has been indicated herein by enclosing it in single brackets (“[ ]”). A public version of these

comments is also being filed with all confidential information removed.

OMRON in the US is the only designer of this product and only supplier of this component.

SWITCH ASSY,RR AUTO is a molded plastic switch containing an electrical switch, and is used only

for automotive purposes as a switch to move the windows open or closed. It is only used for further

assembly of components which go into domestic automobile production. which is specified by auto

manufacturer.

This product is not a target of the US Administration's 301 investigation regarding Intellectual Property

concerns. This is not a concern to IP transfer and impressment. This product contains no IP of interest

related to autonomous vehicle production.

The tariff action ultimately poses a risk of significant damage to OMRON , the domestic

automobile industry, and ultimately the US consumer as an increase in price. Like in the case of similar

approvals for vehicle components at the HTS level, OMRON views this product in the same manner.

Immediate movement of production to a US manufacturer or another country would pose significant

re-tooling costs, significant amounts of time, and approvals pertaining

to consumer automobile safety standards are costly and would take a significant amount of time to

obtain.

OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. believes that CBP can easily exclude the SWITCH

ASSY,RR AUTO in question based solely on the product description. The following are draft CBP

exclusion instructions:

"SWITCH ASSY,RR AUTO "T"-shaped assembly with a "U"-shaped switch oriented with the length of

the T shape "Metal, Plastic, Rubber, Other Material & Material Compound;Switch Assembly used by

Power Window switch (Rear right).Consist of Case assy, Cover, PCB ASSY and 2 strikers.Inside Case

Assy: Knob, light guide, plunger and spring." Dimensions 84 mm X 53 mm X 57.5 mm."

This information will be contained on the invoice from the supplier

PUBLIC VERSION
#### Jason Lee BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 49611.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

May 9, 1995.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied June 27, 1995.

Craig A. Johnston, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before: ULRICH, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and ELLIS, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant pled guilty to first degree robbery and filed for relief under Rule 24.035 to set aside his plea. His appointed counsel filed an affidavit stating the pro se motion contained all claims that could be addressed. Movant asserts on appeal this counsel abandoned him. Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2034

Reelcraft Industries:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

April 12, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4594

ECM Industries LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_04.15.19.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Respress, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Counsel’s application to withdraw granted *(see, People v Crawford,*71 AD2d 38). (Appeal from judgment of Genesee County Court, Dillon, J.—driving while intoxicated.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Lawton, Davis and Lowery, JJ.