alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit32


CERTIFICATION
 OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
 connection with the report on Form 10-Q of Sunvesta, Inc. for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the
 Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Josef Mettler, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
 adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | This report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in this report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the small business issuer at the end of the period covered by this report and results of operations of the small business issuer for the period covered by this report.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:
 November 13, 2008

/s/
 Josef Mettler

Josef
 Mettler

Chief
 Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



This
 certification accompanies this report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent
 required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the small business issuer for the purposes of §18 of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the
 Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this
 report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing. A signed original of this written
 statement required by §906 has been provided to the small business issuer and will be retained by the small business issuer and
 furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.







29
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6089

Kyungshin Lear Sales and Engineering LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

“Made in China 2025” or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Bruce HARDESTY, Appellant.

No. WD 47694.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Feb. 1, 1994.

Bruce Hardesty, pro se.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Mary Moulton Bryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before BERREY, C.J., and KENNEDY and ELLIS, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from convictions of second degree burglary, section 569.170, RSMo 1986, and stealing over $150, section 570.030.3(1), RSMo 1986.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5650

Apergy ESP Systems, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
#### Noriel SNIDER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

No. 67730.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

April 9, 1996.

Dave Hemingway, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Mary Moulton Bryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and-KAROHL and GRIMM, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief.

Movant pled guilty as a persistent drug offender to possession of a controlled substance, § 195.202, RSMo 1994. At that time, he was on probation, having previously received a seven year suspended sentence.

The State recommended a fifteen year sentence concurrent with the seven year sentence, which was to be revoked. However, movant opted to enter a “blind” plea, knowing that the maximum sentence was fifteen years. Following a pre-sentence investigation, the trial court revoked his probation and sentenced him to ten years concurrent with the seven years.

In his motion, defendant contends his counsel “misled him into thinking that by pleading guilty he would receive drug treatment and 120-day shock probation.” The motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law denying movant’s motion are fully supported by the record and are not clearly erroneous. No precedential value would be served by an opinion.

The motion court’s judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
I N T H E U N I T E D S T A T E S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S F O R T H E F I F T H C I R C U I T

N o

. 0 9

- 2 0 5 5 3 C o n f e r e n c e C a l e n d a r

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A ,
P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e

v

.
E L I S E O G U Z M A N

- G A L V A N , a l s o k n o w n a s E l i s e o G u z m a n , a l s o k n o w n a s E l i s e o G u z m a n G a l v a n , a l s o k n o w n a s L u i s Z u n i g a
- G a l v a n ,
D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e S o u t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f T e x a s U S D C N o

. 4 : 0 9

- C R

- 2 4

- 1

B e f o r e S M I T H , P R A D O , a n d H A Y N E S , C i r c u i t J u d g e s

. P E R C U R I A M : *

T h e F e d e r a l P u b l i c D e f e n d e r a p p o i n t e d t o r e p r e s e n t E l i s e o G u z m a n
G a l v a n h a s m o v e d f

o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w a n d h a s f i l e d a b r i e f i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h
A n d e r s v

. C a l i f

o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 ( 1 9 6 7 )

. G u z m a n
- G a l v a n h a s n o t f i l e d a

r e s p o n s e

. O u r i n d e p e n d e n t r e v i e w o f t h e r e c o r d a n d c o u n s e l ’ s b r i e f d i s c l o s e s n o

n o n f r i v o l o u s i s s u e f

o r a p p e a l

. A c c o r d i n g l y , c o u n s e l ’ s m o t i o n f o r l e a v e t o U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D April 20 , 20 10
Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 09-20553 Document: 00511085942 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/20/2010N o

. 0 9

- 2 0 5 5 3

w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D , c o u n s e l i s e x c u s e d f r o m f u r t h e r r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s h e r e i n ,

a n d t h e A P P E A L I S D I S M I S S E D

. S e e 5 T H C I R

. R

. 4 2

. 2

.

2 Case: 09-20553 Document: 00511085942 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/20/2010
Form of Specimen Common Stock of Francesca's Holdings Corporation



 Exhibit 4.1 
 



 
 NUMBER francesca’s SHARES 

FH COLLECTIONS 
 FRANCESCA’S HOLDINGS CORPORATION 

INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

COMMON STOCK CUSIP 351793 10 4 
 SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS 
 THIS
CERTIFIES that 
 is the owner of 
 FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE $0.01 PER SHARE OF 
 FRANCESCA’S HOLDINGS CORPORATION 

transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by Attorney upon surrender of this
Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF. the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers and its corporate seal to be hereunto affixed.

 DATED: 
 SECRETARY 
 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED 
 REGISTRAR AND TRANSFER COMPANY 
 TRANSFER AGENT AND
REGISTRAR 
 FRANCESCA’S HOLDINGS CORPORATION 

CORPORATE SEAL 2007 
 DELAWARE 
 BY AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE 

M. BURR KEIM, PHILA. 







 



 
 The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this
certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: 
 TEN COM - as tenants in common 
 UNIF GIFT MIN
ACT-Custodian 
 TEN ENT - as tenants by the entireties 

(Cust) (Minor) 
 JT TEN- as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common 
 under Uniform Gifts to Minors 
 Act (State)

 Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. 

For Value Received, hereby sell, assign and transfer unto 

PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE 

(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING POSTAL ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE) 

Shares of the Common Stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint
Attorney to transfer the said Shares on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. 
 Dated: 
 X 

X 
 NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE(S) TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME(S) AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THIS CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY
CHANGE WHATEVER. 
 Signature(s) Guaranteed 

By: 
 THE SIGNATURE(S) SHOULD BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE
GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 64 (Tuesday, April 4, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17062-17063]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8154]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Richard Lee Brown, et al.; Change in Bank Control Notices; 
Acquisitions of Shares of Banks or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. Once the notices have been accepted for 
processing, they will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later 
than April 15, 1995.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (Genie D. Short, Vice President) 
2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Richard Lee Brown, Fort Worth, Texas; Trustee of the M.L. Rhea 
Estate, Fort Worth, Texas, Trustee of the Fred D. Thompson, Jr. Trust, 
Fort Worth, Texas, Trustee of the John A. Thompson Trust, Fort Worth, 
Texas; to acquire an additional 20.94 percent, for a total of 24.86 
percent, of the voting shares of Texas Security Bancshares, Inc., Fort 
Worth, Texas, and thereby indirectly acquire Central Bank and Trust, 
Fort Worth, Texas.
    Frederick Dickson Thompson, Fort Worth, Texas, Trustee of the 
Cleaves Rhea Thompson Trust under will Louise R. & Floore, Fort Worth, 
Texas; Trustee [[Page 17063]] of the Frederick Dickson Thompson, Jr., 
Trust under Will Louise R. Floore, Fort Worth, Texas; Trustee of the 
John Andrew Thompson Trust under Will Louise R. Floore, Fort Worth, 
Texas; to acquire an additional 23.40 percent, for a total of 25.00 
percent, of the voting shares of Texas Security Bancshares, Inc., Fort 
Worth, Texas, and thereby indirectly acquire Central Bank and Trust, 
Fort Worth, Texas.
    Cleaves Rhea Thompson, Santa Clara, California; to acquire an 
additional 1.07 percent, for a total of 1.36 percent; Frederick Dickson 
Thompson, Jr., Fort Worth, Texas, to acquire an additional .94 percent, 
for a total of 1.30 percent; John Andrew Thompson, Fort Worth, Texas, 
to acquire an additional 1.25 percent, for a total of 6.17 percent; 
Kelly R. Thompson, Fort Worth, Texas, Executor of the 3 estates of 
Jimmie K. Thompson, Forth Worth, Texas, to acquire an additional .35 
percent, for a total of .79 percent, of the voting shares of Texas 
Security Bancshares, Inc., Fort Worth, Texas, and thereby indirectly 
acquire Central Bank and Trust, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 28, 
1995.
William W. Wiles,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-8154 Filed 4-3-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                         Simione Central Holdings, Inc.
                            (a Delaware Corporation)
                                  Subsidiaries

InfoMed, Inc., a New Jersey corporation.

Script Systems, Inc., a New Jersey corporation.

SC Holding, Inc., a Georgia corporation

Simione Central National, Inc., a Georgia corporation

Simione Central, Inc., a Georgia corporation

Simione Central Consulting, Inc., a Georgia corporation

Benchmark Healthcare Consulting, Inc., a Georgia corporation

Dezine Healthcare Solutions, L.L.C., a Georgia limited liability company

KSI Acquisition, L.L.C., a Georgia limited liability company
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 61 (Thursday, March 30, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16469-16470]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7854]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Office of Fossil Energy
[FE Docket No. 95-05-NG]

Wasatch Oil & Gas Corporation; Order Granting Blanket 
Authorization To Import Natural Gas From Canada

AGENCY: Office of Fossil Energy, DOE.

ACTION: Notice of order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of Fossil Energy of the Department of Energy gives 
notice that it has issued an order granting Wasatch Oil & Gas 
Corporation authorization to import up to 5 Bcf of natural gas from 
Canada over a two-year term beginning on the date of the first import. 
[[Page 16470]] 
    This order is available for inspection and copying in the Office of 
Fuels Programs Docket Room, 3F-056, Forrestal Building, 1000 
Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20585, (202) 586-9478. The 
docket room is open between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., 
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

    Issued in Washington, D.C., March 16, 1995.
Clifford P. Tomaszewski,
Director, Office of Natural Gas, Office of Fuels Programs, Office of 
Fossil Energy.
[FR Doc. 95-7854 Filed 3-29-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
#### Virgil and Vivian BOSWELL, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant/Respondent.

No. 65662.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

May 23, 1995.

Tracy Anne Gilroy, Draheim & Pronschke, St. Louis, for appellants.

Paul E. Littleton, Daniel M. Buescher, Brasher Law Firm, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before CRANE, P.J., and CRANDALL and DOWD, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs, Virgil Boswell and Vivian Boswell, appeal from the judgment of the trial court, entered pursuant to a jury verdict, in favor of defendant, Burlington Northern Railroad Company, in an action to recover damages for the partial flooding of their real estate. Plaintiffs’ brought the action under § 389.660, RSMo (1994) which required railroads to provide proper drainage through railroad rights-of-ways.

No error of law appears. A written opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Defendant’s motion to dismiss the appeal for plaintiffs’ failure to comply with Rule 84.04(h) is denied.
Exhibit 10(a)



 Exhibit 10(a) 
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 







 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Statement of Additional
Information and to the use of our report dated April 11, 2011, with respect to the statutory-basis financial statements and schedules of Transamerica Financial Life Insurance Company, included in Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the
Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-173975) under the Securities Act of 1933 and related Prospectus of Flexible Premium Variable Annuity – T. 
 /s/Ernst & Young LLP 
 Des Moines, Iowa 

July 13, 2011
#### In the Matter of Christina W., a Child Alleged to be Neglected.

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Family Court erred by finding that respondent had abandoned her child. To prove an abandonment, petitioner must show that, for six months preceding the filing of the petition, the parent has failed to visit the child and communicate with the child or the agency (Social Services Law § 384-b [5] [a]). Although it was undisputed that respondent did not visit or communicate with her child during the relevant time period, the agency conceded at the hearing that there had been at least 15 telephone contacts between the agency and respondent during the six months preceding the filing of the petition, many of them initiated by respondent. Although a single contact may not necessarily preclude a finding of abandonment *(see, Matter of Loretta Lynn W.,*149 AD2d 928), evidence of this number of contacts between the parent and the agency does preclude

*998such finding *(see, Matter of Madeline R.,*117 Misc 2d 14). (Appeal from order of Allegany County Family Court, Sprague, J.—termination of parental rights.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green, Pine and Lowery, JJ.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6079

Kyungshin Lear Sales and Engineering LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

“Made in China 2025” or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-4496

Zipline International Inc: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel