Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 59 / Tuesday, March 28, 1995 / Notices 15901

publication date of these final results of

administrative review, as provided by

section 751(a)(1) of the Act: (1) The cash

deposit rate for Akzo will be 0.56

percent; (2) for merchandise exported by

manufacturers or exporters not covered

in this review but covered in the

original less-than-fair-value (LTFV)

investigation, the cash deposit rate will

continue to be the rate published in the

most recent final determination for

which the manufacturer or exporter

received a company-specific rate; (3) if

the exporter is not a firm covered in this

review, or the original investigation, but

the manufacturer is, the cash deposit

rate will be that established for the

manufacturer of the merchandise in the

original investigation; and (4) the ‘‘all

others’’ rate will be 24.58 percent,

established in the LTFV investigation,

and in accordance with the

Department’s practice. See Floral Trade

Council v. United States, 822 F. Supp.

766 (2993), and Federal Mogul Corp.,

822 F. Supp. (1993).

These deposit requirements shall

remain in effect until publication of the

final results of the next administrative

review.

This notice services as a reminder to

importers of their responsibility under

19 CFR 353.26 to file a certificate

regarding the reimbursement of

antidumping duties prior to liquidation

of the relevant entries during this

review period. Failure to comply with

this requirement could result in the

Secretary’s presumption that

reimbursement of antidumping duties

occurred, and the subsequent

assessment of double antidumping

duties.

This notice also serves as a reminder

to parties subject to administrative

protective orders (APOs) of their

responsibility concerning the

disposition of proprietary information

disclosed under APO in accordance

with 19 CFR 353.34(d). Timely written

notification of return/destruction of

APO materials or conversion to judicial

protective order is hereby requested.

Failure to comply with regulations and

the terms of an APO is a sanctionable

violation.

This administrative review and notice

are in accordance with section 751(a)(1)

of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)(1)) and 19

CFR 353.22.

Dated: March 16, 1995.

Susan G. Esserman,

Assistant Secretary for Import

Administration.

[FR Doc. 95–7609 Filed 3–27–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–M

Department of the Interior, et al.;

Notice of Consolidated Decision on

Applications for Duty-Free Entry of

Scientific Instruments

This is a decision consolidated

pursuant to Section 6(c) of the

Educational, Scientific, and Cultural

Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub.

L. 89–651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR 301).

Related records can be viewed between

8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. in Room 4211,

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and

Constitution Avenue, N.W.,

Washington, D.C.

Comments: None received. Decision:

Approved. No instrument of equivalent

scientific value to the foreign

instruments described below, for such

purposes as each is intended to be used,

is being manufactured in the United

States.

Docket Number: 94–141. Applicant:

Department of the Interior, Menlo Park,

CA 94025. Instrument: SIR Mass

Spectrometer, Model PRISM.

Manufacturer: Fisons Instruments,

United Kingdom. Intended Use: See

notice at 60 FR 442, January 4, 1995.

Reasons: The foreign instrument

provides: (1) an adjustable

multicollector with four deep Faraday

buckets, (2) an electromagnetic sector

analyzer with a 50 cm dispersion and

(3) an online elemental analyzer.

Docket Number: 94–148. Applicant:

Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of

Columbia University, Palisades, NY

10964. Instrument: Isotope Ratio-Gas

Source Mass Spectrometer, Model

PRISM. Manufacturer: Fisons

Instruments, United Kingdom. Intended

Use: See notice at 60 FR 443, January 4,

1995. Reasons: The foreign instrument

provides: (1) an adjustable

multicollector with four deep Faraday

buckets, (2) an electromagnetic sector

analyzer with a 50 cm dispersion and

(3) an automatic cold finger for samples

as small as 0.2 ml.

These capabilities of each of the

foreign instruments described above is

pertinent to each applicant’s intended

purposes. We know of no instrument or

apparatus being manufactured in the

United States which is of equivalent

scientific value to either of the foreign

instruments.

Frank W. Creel

Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff.

[FR Doc. 95–7610 Filed 3–27–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–F

[C–549–501]

Certain Circular Welded Carbon Steel

Pipes and Tubes From Thailand:

Preliminary Results of Countervailing

Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of preliminary results of

countervailing duty administrative

review.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce

(the Department) is conducting an

administrative review of the

countervailing duty order on certain

circular welded carbon steel pipe and

tubes from Thailand. We have

preliminary determined the net subsidy

to be 0.73 percent ad valorem for Saha

Thai Pipe and Tube Company and all

other companies for the period January

1, 1992, through December 31, 1992. If

the final results remain the same as

these preliminary results of

administrative review, we will instruct

U.S. customs to assess countervailing

duties as indicated above.

Interested parties are invited to

comment on these preliminary results.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 28, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Penelope Naas and Gary Bettger, Office

of Countervailing Investigations, Import

Administration, U.S. Department of

Commerce, Room B099, 14th Street and

Constitution Avenue, N.W.,

Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202)

482–3534 or 482–2239, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

On August 3, 1993, the Department of

Commerce (the Department) published

in the Federal Register a notice of

‘‘Opportunity to Request an

Administrative Review’’ (58 FR 41239)

of the countervailing duty order on

pipes and tubes from Thailand (50 FR

32751; August 14, 1985). On August 31,

1993, the respondents, the Royal Thai

Government (RTG) and Saha Thai Pipe

and Tube Company (Saha Thai),

requested an administrative review of

this order. We initiated a review of the

period January 1, 1992, through

December 31, 1992, on September 30,

1993 (58 FR 51053). The review covers

one manufacturer/exporter of the

subject merchandise and nine programs.

The final results of the last

administrative review in this case were

published October 9, 1991 (56 FR

50852).