alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7841

MICHAEL ANGELO ROBINSON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus EARL BESHEARS; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-97-1358) Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 21, 1998 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Angelo Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Annabelle Louise Lisic, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Robinson v. Beshears , No. CA-97-1358 (D. Md. Nov. 26, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-1875

GHL International, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of CFO

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section
1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Gateway, Inc., a Delaware corporation (Gateway), does hereby certify that:



a) The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
quarter ended December 31, 2004 (the Form 10-K) of Gateway fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



b) The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Gateway.



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                         
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 3, 2005 |  |  |  | 
|                     |  |  |  | 
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    RODERICK M. SHERWOOD
III                                         
|                     |  |  |  |  |  |     |  | Roderick M. Sherwood III Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
No. 07-13-00437-CV

In the Interest of A.A., a Child From the 108th District Court

 of Potter County

April 2, 2014

Opinion by Chief Justice Quinn

§

§

§

§

§

§

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated April 2, 2014, it is ordered, adjudged

and decreed that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed.

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis, no costs beyond those which

may have been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o

FILE COPY
**Exhibit
      23**





**CONSENT
      OF MALONE & BAILEY, PC,**


**INDEPENDENT
      REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





Ener1,
      Inc.


Fort
      Lauderdale, Florida





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
      Ener1, Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-112583 and 333-112581) of our report dated
      April 4, 2007 for Ener1, Inc.








MALONE
      & BAILEY, PC


www.malone-bailey.com


Houston,
      Texas





April
      6,
      2007
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

October 18, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-1865

Lantec Products Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2213

Brinly Hardy Co:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4330

SPM Flow Control, Inc. DBA Weir SPM:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5028 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5028

 To amend the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act to ensure that 
   child protective services systems do not permit the separation of 
 children from parents on the basis of poverty, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 2023

Ms. Moore of Wisconsin (for herself and Mrs. Watson Coleman) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education 
                           and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act to ensure that 
   child protective services systems do not permit the separation of 
 children from parents on the basis of poverty, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Family Poverty is Not Child Neglect 
Act''.

SEC. 2. GRANTS TO STATES FOR CHILD ABUSE OR NEGLECT PREVENTION AND 
              TREATMENT PROGRAMS.

    Section 106(a) of the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (42 
U.S.C. 5106a(a)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``neglect;'' and 
        inserting ``neglect, ensuring that reports concerning a child's 
        living arrangements or subsistence needs are addressed through 
        services and benefits and that no child is separated from the 
        child's parent for reasons of poverty;''; and
            (2) in paragraph (4), by striking ``response;'' and 
        inserting ``response, except that such system, tools, and 
        protocols shall not authorize the separation of any child from 
        the child's parent or guardian on the basis of poverty;''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 59 (Tuesday, March 28, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15896]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7602]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Consolidated Farm Service Agency


List of Warehouses and Availability of List of Cancellations and/
or Terminations

AGENCY: Consolidated Farm Service Agency, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of publication of Warehouses Licensed Under the U.S. 
Warehouse Act and the availability of a listing of cancellations and/or 
terminations occurring during calendar year 1994.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Consolidated Farm Service 
Agency has published a list of warehouses licensed under the U.S. 
Warehouse Act (7 U.S.C. 241 et seq.) as of December 31, 1994, as 
required by section 26 of that Act (7 U.S.C. 266). A list of 
cancellations or terminations that occurred during calendar year 1994 
is also available. Interested parties may obtain a copy of either list 
from the person listed below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mrs. Judy Fry, Consolidated Farm 
Service Agency, Warehouse and Inventory Division, U.S. Department of 
Agriculture, P.O. Box 2415, Room 5962, South Agriculture Building, 
Washington, D.C. 20013-2415, telephone: 202-720-3822.

    Signed at Washington, D.C., on March 22, 1995.
Bruce R. Weber,
Acting Administrator, Consolidated Farm Service Agency.
[FR Doc. 95-7602 Filed 3-27-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-05-P
Exhibit 10.17
 AMSURG CORP.
RESTRICTED SHARE AWARD AGREEMENT
 THIS RESTRICTED SHARE AWARD AGREEMENT
 WHEREAS,
 WHEREAS,
 NOW, THEREFORE,
 Grant of Restricted Shares
 
 Sections 2 3
 Terms and Rights as a Stockholder




---



##### 



Termination of Restrictions
 Change in Control
 Delivery of Shares
   2




---



##### 



Effect of Lapse of Restrictions
 No Right to Continued Employment
 Adjustments Section 4.2
 Amendment to Award
 Withholding of Taxes ab initio
 3




---



##### 



Plan Governs
 Severability
 Notices
 To the Company:
    
    AmSurg Corp.20 Burton Hills BoulevardNashville, Tennessee 37215Attn: Director of Human ResourcesTo the Grantee:
    
    The address then maintained with respect to the Grantee in the Companys records.
 Governing Law
 Successors in Interest
 Resolution of Disputes
 4




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
 AMSURG CORP.By:
    /s/ Christopher A. HoldenName:
    Christopher A. HoldenTitle:
    President and Chief Executive OfficerGRANTEE:SignaturePlease Print 5
#### Dennis Wayne AILOR, Respondent, v. STATE ex rel. Karen Sue AILOR, Appellant.

No. WD 51318.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

May 21, 1996.

Terrence M. Messonnier, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, LaFayette County, Lexington, for appellant.

James D. Worthington, Lexington, for respondent.

Before HANNA, P.J., FENNER, C.J., and ELLIS, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from the denial of a motion for contempt based on alleged willful failure to pay court ordered child support.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 59 (Tuesday, March 28, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15950-15951]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7625]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee Meetings

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting to solicit information from 
the aviation maintenance community concerning maintenance, preventive 
maintenance, rebuilding and alteration, and inspection of certain 
aircraft. The information is requested to assist the Aviation 
Rulemaking Advisory Committee (ARAC) in its deliberations.

DATES: The meeting will be held on March 29, 1995, from 10:00 a.m. 
until 3:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Worthington Hotel, 200 Main 
Street, Fort Worth, Texas.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ms. Christine Leonard, Professional Aviation Maintenance Association, 
1008 Russell Lane, West Chester, PA 19382; telephone (610) 399-1744.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463; 5 U.S.C. app. II), notice is 
hereby given of a meeting to solicit information from the aviation 
maintenance community concerning maintenance, preventive maintenance, 
rebuilding and alteration, and inspection of certain 
[[Page 15951]] aircraft. The information is requested to assist the 
Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee in its deliberations with regard 
to a task assigned to ARAC by the Federal Aviation Administration.

    Specifically, the task is as follows:
    Review Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations, parts 43 and 91, and 
supporting policy and guidance material for the purpose of determining 
the course of action to be taken for rulemaking and/or policy relative 
to the issue of general aviation aircraft inspection and maintenance, 
specifically Sec. 91.409, part 43, and Appendices A and D of part 43. 
In your review, consider any inspection and maintenance initiatives 
underway throughout the aviation industry affecting general aviation 
with a maximum certificated takeoff weight of 12,500 pounds or less. 
Also consider ongoing initiatives in the areas of: maintenance 
recordkeeping; research and development; the age of the current 
aircraft fleet; harmonization; the true cost of inspection versus 
maintenance; and changes in technology.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but may be limited to 
the space available. In addition, sign and oral interpretation can be 
made available at the meeting, as well as an assistive listening 
device. Arrangements may be made by contacting the meeting coordinator 
listed under the heading FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on March 22, 1995.
Frederick J. Leonelli,
Assistant Executive Director , Air Carrier/General Aviation Maintenance 
Issues, Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 95-7625 Filed 3-27-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
EXHIBIT 32.1
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Payless ShoeSource, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2004, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, StevenJ. Douglass, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date: September 7, 2004                                                   /s/ Steven J. Douglass   Steven J. Douglass   Chairman of the Board and
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2973

Price Pump Company:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4674

II-VI Incorporated:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

“Made in China 2025” or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel