alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fifth Season International, Inc.: Exhibit 10.28 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com






Exhibit 10.28

Sale Contract, dated May 5, 2010, between Zhejiang Jinghua
Industry Co., Ltd. and the 
Fifth Season (Zhejiang) Trade Co., Ltd. 

Contract No.: 20100505001 
Signature Site: Hangzhou 

Purchaser (Party A): Zhejiang Jinghua Industry Co., Ltd. 

Seller (Party B): The Fifth Season (Zhejiang) Trade Co., Ltd.


Pursuant to the provisions of the Contract Law of PRC, relevant
laws and administrative regulations, and the principal of equality,
voluntariness and honesty, both parties enter into this agreement regarding the
purchase of LED lights series and electricity-saving lamps. 

1. Name, Quantity and Price 


	No. 	Name of Product 	Unit 	Quantity 	Unit Price (RMB) 	Total Value (RMB) 
	1 	LED Underground Lamp 	set 	2,000 	3750 	7,500,000 
	4 	LED Pointolite 	set 	12,000 	606 	7,272,000 
	Total value 	14,772,000 



2. Payment Method and Deadline: 30% down payment and the rest
shall be paid on delivery. 

3. Delivery Time: before June 31, 2010 

4. Delivery Ways: Party B shall deliver the goods to the
warehouse appointed by Party A. 

5. Packing Standard: common cartons for packing 

6. Transportation: by truck 

7. Fees: Party B is liable for packing and transportation fees.


8. Company for Goods Collecting: Zhejiang Jinghua Industry Co.,
Ltd. 

9. After-sale Services: Party B shall be liable for technique
support and product quality. Party B shall also offer one year guarantee for
product quality. Party B shall offer maintenance with charge of basic cost for
other issues caused except for product quality. 




10. Liability for Breach 

1) In case that Party A fails to deliver the goods or Party B
rejects the goods without payment, the foregoing default party shall pay the
liquidated damages of 30% of the total payment of the goods. 

2) As to overdue delivery/collection or deferred payment, the
foregoing default party shall pay the liquidated damages of 0.5‰ of the due
payment per day. 

11.This agreement has been entered into in compliance with laws
and neither party shall not alter or rescind this agreement without consensus.
The alteration or rescission can only be accepted upon consensus. 

12. This agreement has four counterparts and each party has two
counterparts. 

13. Any disputes related to this agreement can be brought to
Hangzhou People’s Court if both parties cannot reach consensus. 




(This page is for signature only and has no text.) 

Party A (Buyer): Zhejiang Jinghua Industry Co., Ltd. 
By:
/sealed/ Zhejiang Jinghua Industry Co., Ltd. 
Date: May 5, 2010 

Party B (Seller): The Fifth Season (Zhejiang) Trade Co., Ltd

By: /sealed/The Fifth Season (Zhejiang) Trade Co., Ltd 
Opening
Bank: Agricultural Bank of China, Hangzhou Wangjiang Branch 
Bank No.:
005701040009886 
Date: May 5, 2010
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7656
In Re: PAUL NAGY, Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:98-hc-00951-BR) Submitted: October 18, 2006 Decided: November 1, 2006 Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Paul Nagy, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Paul Nagy petitions this court for a writ of mandamus, seeking disqualification of the district court, his attorney, and a therapist. Mandamus is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary situations. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). Mandamus relief is only available when there are no other means by which the relief sought could be granted, id. , and may not be used as a substitute for appeal. In re Catawba Indian Tribe , 973 F.2d 1133, 1135 (4th Cir. 1992). The party seeking mandamus relief carries the heavy burden of showing that he has no other adequate means to attain the relief he desires and that his entitlement to such relief is clear and indisputable. Allied Chem. Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc. , 449 U.S. 33, 35 (1980). Nagy has failed to make the requisite showing, and we dismiss the mandamus petition. We deny the motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, for hearing en banc, and for disqualification of certain judges, and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. The emergency motion to expedite is denied as moot.

PETITION DISMISSED
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-2271

AIT Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

N o. 04

- 21

- 00463

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.M. , J.M.M., and L.A.M., Children

From the 73rd Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020

- PA

- 00974

Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr., Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE CHAPA, JUSTICE RIOS , AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order of termination is

AFFIRMED. No costs of appeal are assessed due to a ppellant’s indigence.

SIGNED April 13, 2022.

_____________________________ Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5422

Radio Systems Corp:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_5-30-2019.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Killbuck Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Diane Knowles, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,; and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                                                      
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Diane S. Knowles                                 
|    |  | Diane S. Knowles Chief Financial Officer May 12, 2004



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Killbuck Bancshares, Inc. and will be retained by Killbuck Bancshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 21**

 

 

The following entities aresubsidiaries of the Company as of March 31, 2003:

 

Horizon Group Properties, L.P.

Third HGI, Inc.

Third HGI, L.L.C.

Third Horizon Group LimitedPartnership

ThirdHorizon Roseville LLC

Daleville,Sommerset, Tulare Finance Company, Inc.

Daleville,Sommerset, Tulare Outlet Centers, L.P.

Gretna,Sealy, Traverse City Finance Company, Inc.

Gretna,Sealy, Traverse City Outlet Centers, L.L.C.

LakeshoreMarketplace Finance Company, Inc.

LakeshoreMarketplace, LLC

HollandOutlet Center, LLC

HollandOutlet Center Finance Company, Inc.

LaughlinFinance Company, Inc.

LaughlinHoldings LLC

LaughlinOutlet Center LLC

MedfordFinance Company, Inc.

MedfordHoldings LLC

MedfordOutlet Center LLC

WarrentonFinance Company, Inc.

WarrentonHoldings LLC

WarrentonOutlet Center LLC

 

1

----
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**STATEMENTOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the period ended September 30, 2005 (the “Form 10-Q”) of CardinalFinancial Corporation, I, Robert A. Cern, Executive Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to myknowledge:

 

(a)           the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(b)           theinformation contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of theCompany and its subsidiaries as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.

 

 
| Date: November 9, 2005 |  /s/ Robert A. Cern                              |   |
|-----------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                        | Robert A. Cern                                        |
|                        | Executive Vice President and Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
**Exhibit 10.122**

 

SECONDAMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 

THISSECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT is made as of the 19th day of August,2003, by and between Horizon Group Properties, Inc, a Maryland corporation(“Employer”), and Gary J Skoien, and individual domiciled in the State ofIllinois (“Executive”).

 

Employerand Executive previously entered into an Employment Agreement dated as of June15, 1998, as amended as of August 29, 2000 (the “Employment Agreement”)providing for the employment of Executive by Employer.

 

Byresolution adopted by Employer’s Board of Directors at its meeting held August19, 2003, Employer determined to amend Executive Base Pay, as such term isdefined in Section (3)(a) of the Employment Agreement.

 

NOW,THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the continued service byExecutive for Employer, Employer and Executive hereby amend the EmploymentAgreement as follows:

 

1.  Base Salary, as such term is defined inSection (3)(a), is amended to be $325,000.

 

2.  As amended hereby, the Employment Agreementremains in full force and effect.

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date firstabove written.

 

 
| Horizon Group  Properties, Inc. |           |
|---------------------------------|----------------|
|                            |           |
| By:                             | By:            |
|                            |           |
|                            |           |
| /s/ David R. Tinkham            |           | /s/ Gary J. Skoien |   |
| David R. Tinkham, Secretary     | Gary J. Skoien |
|                                 |                |  |  |  |

 

1

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.32

                                CHANGE-IN-CONTROL
                                    AMENDMENT



         THIS CHANGE-IN-CONTROL AMENDMENT (this "Amendment") is entered into as
of this 31st day of August, 1998, by and among U.S. Can Corporation, a Delaware
corporation (the "Corporation"), United States Can Company, a Delaware
corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of the Corporation ("U.S. Can"), and
Lawrence T. Messina (the "Employee"), an officer or employee of the Corporation,
U.S. Can or one of U.S. Can's subsidiaries.

         WHEREAS, the parties hereto previously entered into a Change-in-Control
Agreement dated September 20, 1995 (the "Agreement"); and

         WHEREAS, the parties hereto are mutually desirous of amending the
Agreement to modify a provision of the Agreement whereby the trigger for a stock
acquisition constituting a change-in-control event is incorrectly stated to be
20%;
         NOW, THEREFORE, the Agreement is hereby amended by substituting fifteen
percent (15%) for twenty percent (20%) in the fifth line of Section 1(a) of the
Agreement.
         All other terms and conditions of the Agreement are hereby ratified and
confirmed in all respects.




<PAGE>   2


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as 
of the date first written above.

U.S. CAN CORPORATION                            UNITED STATES CAN COMPANY



By  /s/ Paul W. Jones                           By  /s/ Paul W. Jones
    ----------------------------                    ---------------------------
        Paul W. Jones                                   Paul W. Jones
        Chairman, President and                         Chairman, President and
        Chief Executive Officer                         Chief Executive Officer


EMPLOYEE SIGNATURE



  /s/ Lawrence T. Messina                     
  ------------------------------
      Lawrence T. Messina

                                        2
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5289

Radio Systems Corp:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_5-30-2019.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXHIBIT
23

CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent
to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-183748, 333-153421, 333-117231, and 333-60114)
relating to the 2000 Stock Option and Incentive Plan of Shoe Carnival, Inc., the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-74050
and 333-44047) relating to the 1993 Stock Option and Incentive Plan of Shoe Carnival, Inc., the Registration Statement on Form
S-8 (No. 33-80979) relating to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Shoe Carnival, Inc., and the Registration Statement on Form
S-8 (No. 333-82819) relating to the Outside Directors Stock Option Plan of Shoe Carnival, Inc. of our reports dated April 16,
2015, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Shoe Carnival, Inc. and subsidiaries
(the “Company”) and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended January 31, 2015.

/s/
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Indianapolis, Indiana
April 16, 2015
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5091 

To require the Secretary of Agriculture to annually publish certain data 

with respect to grape production, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 28, 2023 

Ms. TENNEY (for herself and Mr. MORELLE) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Agriculture to annually publish 

certain data with respect to grape production, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fairness in Vineyard 

5 Data Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. GRAPE PRODUCTION DATA. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Agriculture, act8 ing through the Administrator of the National Agricul9 tural Statistics Service, shall— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5091 IH

1 (1) not later than 1 year after the date of the 

2 enactment of this Act— 

3 (A) conduct a survey on grape production 

4 in each State, including— 

5 (i) total acreage; and 

6 (ii) production, utilization, and acre7 age by type, variety, county, and year 

8 planted; and 

9 (B) make publicly available on the website 

10 of the National Agricultural Statistics Service 

11 the results of such survey and the data from 

12 such survey; and 

13 (2) not later than 2 years after the date of the 

14 enactment of this Act and annually for the 3 years 

15 thereafter, make publicly available on the website of 

16 the National Agricultural Statistics Service data 

17 from the 5 States with the highest grape production 

18 in the preceding year, as determined using data 

19 from the survey required under paragraph (1)(A). 

20 (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.— 

21 (1) SURVEY.—There is authorized to be appro22 priated to carry out subparagraphs (A) and (B) of 

23 subsection (a)(1) $2,500,000 for fiscal year 2024. 

24 (2) PUBLICATION OF DATA.—There is author25 ized to be appropriated to carry out subsection 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5091 IH

1 (a)(2) $1,500,000 for each of fiscal years 2025 

2 through 2028. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 58 (Monday, March 27, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15747-15748]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7497]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[Docket A(32b1)-2-95; Docket A(32b1)-3-95]


Foreign-Trade Zone 124--Grammercy, Louisiana, Subzone 124C, Star 
Enterprise, (Crude Oil Refinery Complex); Foreign-Trade Zone 116--Port 
Arthur, Texas, Subzone 116A, Star Enterprise (Crude Oil Refinery 
Complex) Requests for Modification of Restrictions

    Requests have been submitted to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the 
Board) by the South Louisiana Port Commission, grantee of FTZ 124, and 
the Foreign-Trade Zone of Southeast Texas, grantee of FTZ 116, pursuant 
to Sec. 400.32(b)(1) of the Board's regulations, for modification of 
the restrictions in FTZ Board Orders 667 and 668 authorizing Subzones 
124C and 116A at the crude oil refinery complexes of Star Enterprise in 
Convent, Louisiana, and in Jefferson/Hardin Counties, Texas. The 
requests were formally filed on March 22, 1995.
    The FTZ Board approved subzone status for the Star Enterprise 
refineries [[Page 15748]] in 1993 (Subzone 124C, Board Order 667, 59 FR 
60, 1/3/94; and Subzone 116A, Board Order 668, 59 FR 61, 1/3/94). The 
approvals were subject to certain standard restrictions, including one 
that required the election of privileged foreign status on incoming 
foreign merchandise.
    The companies are now requesting that this restriction be modified 
so that they would have the option available under the FTZ Act to 
choose non-privileged foreign (NPF) status on foreign refinery inputs 
used to produce certain petrochemical feedstocks and by-products 
including the following: benzene, toluene, xylenes, hydrocarbon 
mixtures, distillates/residual fuel oils, kerosene, naphthas, ethane, 
propane, butane, ethylene, propylene, butylene, butadiene, petroleum 
coke, asphalt, sulfur, and sulfuric acid.
    The requests cite the FTZ Board's recent decision in the Amoco, 
Texas City, Texas case (Board Order 731, 60 FR 13118, 3/10/95) which 
authorized subzone status with the NPF option noted above. In the Amoco 
case, the Board concluded that the restriction that precluded this NPF 
option was not needed under current oil refinery industry 
circumstances.
    Public comment on the proposal is invited from interested parties. 
Submissions (original and 3 copies) shall be addressed to the Board's 
Executive Secretary at the address below. The closing period for their 
receipt is [30 days from date of publication].
    A copy of the application and accompanying exhibits will be 
available for public inspection at the following location: Office of 
the Executive Secretary, Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, Room 3716, 14th & Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 
20230.

    Dated: March 22, 1995
Dennis Puccinelli,
Acting Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-7497 Filed 3-24-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P