T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. LUCAS ORT EGA- LOPE Z, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 10- 50374 D. C. No . 3 : 0 9 - c r - 0 3 9 5 6 - BT M ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e S o u th e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia B a rryT . M os kow i t z , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng

S ubm i tt e d A pr i l 20, 2011 ** B efo re: R Y M E R , T H O M A S , an dP A E Z , C i rcu i tJu d g es. L uc a s O rt e ga - L ope z appe a l s f r om the 63- m onth s e nt e nc e i m pos e d f ol l ow i ng hi s gui l ty- pl eaconv i ct i on for a tt em pt ed re -e ntryaf t erdepo rt at i on , i n v i ol at i on of 8 U . S . C . § 1 32 6, and fraud and m i suse of an entrydo cum ent , i n v i ol at i on of 1 8 U .S .C . § 1 5 4 6 ( a ) . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 , a n dw e a f f irm . 

# FI LED APR28 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 50374 2 O rt ega- L op ez fi rs tcont ends thatthe di stri ctcourtprocedural l y e rr ed by: (1) r e f u s in g to c o n s id e rim p o s in g alo w e rs e n te n c e in o r d e rto a c h ie v e p a r ityw ith f a s t - tr a c k de f

e nda nt s ; a nd ( 2) f

a i l i ng t o a de qua t e l ye xpl a i n i t s r e a s ons f orthe se nt ence . T he re cord ref l ec t s thatthe di stri ctcourtconsi dere d al l of the fa ct ors s et f orth i n 18 U . S . C . § 3553( a ) , a de qua t e l ye xpl a i ne d the s e nt e nc e , a nd di d not o th e rw is e p r o c e d u r a llye rr . Se e U n ite d S ta tes v . Ca r ty , 5 2 0 F .3 d9 8 4 , 9 9 1 - 9 3 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 8 ) ( e n b a n c ) . O rte g a - L o p e z a ls o c o n te n d s th a t h is s e n te n c e is s u b s ta n tiv e lyu n r e a s o n ab le . T he r e c or d r e f

l e c t s tha tthe 63- m onth s e nt e nc e i s s ubs t a nt i ve l yr e a s onabl e i n l i ght o f th e to ta lityo f

th e c ir c u m s ta n c e s . See G al l v. U ni ted States , 552 U . S . 38, 51- 52 ( 2 0 0 7 ) ; s e e a ls o U

n ite d S ta tes v . G o n z a lez - Zo te lo , 55 6 F . 3d 73 6, 73 9 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 9 ) ( “[ A ] d is tr ic t c o u rt m a yn o t ta k e f a s t- tr a c kd is p a r itie s in to a c c o u n t in se nt enci ng un der 18 U . S . C . § 3 55 3(a) (6) bec ause § 3 55 3(a) (6) di re ct s the di stri ct ju d g e to c o n s id e ro n ly‘u n w a rr a n te d ’ s e n te n c in g d is p a r itie s .” ) . T o the ext entO rt ega- L op ez chal l enges the const i tut i on al i ty of hi s s ent ence o n th e g r o u n d th a t th e s ta tu to rym a x im u m s e n te n c e f o ras e c tio n 1 3 2 6 v io la tio n is tw o y e a r s im p r is o n m e n t o rth a t h is s e n te n c e w a s w r o n g lye n h a n c e db e c au s e h is pri or conv i ct i on w as no tchar ged i n the i nd i ctm ent , subm i tt ed t o a j ury, or prov ed b e y o n d ar e a s o n ab le d o u b t, th e s e a r g u m e n ts a r e w ith o u t m e r it. See U ni ted States10- 50374 3 v. C on tre ras-H

erna ndez , 6 2 8 F .3 d1 1 6 9 , 1 1 7 4 - 7 5 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 1 ) ; se e al so U ni ted State s v . C ov i an- Sandov al , 46 2 F . 3d 10 90 , 10 96 -97 (9th C i r. 20 06 ). AF F I RME D.