alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>              5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF BOSTON CELTICS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND ITS
SUBSIDIARIES AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND THE RELATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>           1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,419
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                86,683
<PP&E>                                              45
<DEPRECIATION>                                      33
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  87,870
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,609
<BONDS>                                         83,486
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (46,144)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    87,870
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      845
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,683
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,781)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,181)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,181)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.15)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit
      32.2**














**Principal
      Financial Officer’s Certification Pursuant To**


**Section
      1350**


**(furnished,
      not filed)**














In
      connection with the Annual Report of GeoGlobal Resources Inc. (the Company)
      on
      Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on April 17, 2007 and this Form 10KSB/A (the Report),
      I,
      Allan J. Kent, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/
      Allan J. Kent








Allan
      J.
      Kent


Chief
      Financial Officer


May
      11,
      2007
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Petitioner

v.

NATHANIEL A. SPADY,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 731 MAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 17th day of May, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

NORMAN BLACKWELL,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 306 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 27th day of January, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Annual Report of American Bio Medica Corporation (the
      "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed
      with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 29, 2007 (the "Report"), I,
      Keith E. Palmer, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Keith E. PalmerKeith
                E. Palmer
              Chief
                Financial Officer and
              Executive
                Vice President
              
              March
                  29, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 57 (Friday, March 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15558]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7251]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-5-003]


Northwest Pipeline Corp.; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas 
Tariff

March 20, 1995.
    Take notice that on March 14, 1995, Northwest Pipeline Corporation 
(Northwest) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Third 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets with a proposed 
effective date of November 6, 1994:

Second Substitute Second Revised Sheet No. 234
Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 235
Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 237
Substitute Original Sheet No. 237-A
Second Substitute Original Sheet No. 237-B
Second Substitute Original Sheet No. 237-C

    Northwest states that the purpose of this filing is to comply with 
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's directives in its Order 
Accepting Compliance Filing, Subject to Conditions, Establishing 
Technical Conference, and Deferring Action on Rehearing issued February 
27, 1995 in Docket Nos. RP95-5-001 and RP95-5-002 (Order).
    The Order requires Northwest to provide for trading of Receiving 
Party Imbalances with Receiving Party Imbalances, and Receiving Party 
Imbalances with Shipper Imbalances. Northwest states that the instant 
filing provides for these trading provisions and describes how 
Northwest will administer these new provisions. The addition of these 
provisions beget the need for additional clarifications of the netting/
trading provisions.
    Northwest states that a copy of this filing has been served upon 
all intervenors in Docket No. RP95-5-000, upon Northwest's 
jurisdictional customers, and upon affected state regulatory 
commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 
of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. All such protests 
should be filed on or before March 27, 1995. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-7251 Filed 3-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit
23.1

















Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Forms
S-8 Nos. 333-74245, 333-39450, 333-67720, 333-130135 and
333-136065) pertaining to the 1998 Stock Incentive Plan of GeoGlobal
Resources Inc. and in the Registration Statement (Form S-3, No. 333-129225) and
the related prospectus pertaining to the registration of 6,671,316 shares of
common stock of GeoGlobal Resources Inc., of our report dated March 23, 2007
(except Note 6(c),
as to which the date is June 5, 2008)with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of GeoGlobal Resources Inc. included in Amendment No. 2 to
the Annual Report (Form 10-KSB/A) for the year ended December 31,
2006.














"Ernst & Young LLP"
(signed)





CALGARY,
ALBERTA                                                                           CHARTERED
ACCOUNTANTS


June 6,
2008
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7251
PAUL ED NEWTON, a/k/a Paul E. Newton, Petitioner - Appellant, versus G. K. WASHINGTON, Warden; BUCKINGHAM CORRECTIONAL CENTER, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-01-477-7) Submitted: November 5, 2002 Decided: December 4, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Paul Ed Newton, Appellant Pro Se. John H. McLees, Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Paul Ed Newton seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have re viewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find Newton has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. SeeNewton v. Washington , No. CA-01-477-7 (W.D. Va. Aug. 5, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Barcilio BLAKE, Appellant, v. RYDER SYSTEM, d/b/a Ryder Truck Rental, Respondent.

No. WD 48105.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Feb. 1, 1994.

Herbert M. Rope, Kansas City, for appellant.

Brian J. Fowler, Kansas City, for respondent.

Before SMART, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and FENNER, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from a decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission for denial of claim for workers’ compensation benefits.

The award of the Commission is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
OFFICE OF THE AY7’ORNEY GENERAL OF ‘TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

rianorrrble Stanley KulsvI.36: 

County AttcWn8y 

JM?:tt County 

c u9ro , mxas 

Defw six-1 opmar uo. 0-3!i67 

Ret Wonld the gmWng of 1u1 

easaleent, as otnltmated 

vitb the sale of land, by 

8 C~S@iOlMBP t0 th8 OO\pltJ 

ior, atate ht$hlmy purposes 

ooastitnte a OFIJ&~M offense? 

Ye\u. reqnest ?or aa oplaim at this densrat trppcn 

the above stated qtmat%aa haa boea waelvad. If6 quote from 

your lettw 48 f&.larr 


Honorable Stwley Kulavik, Page 4 

Ia the ease of Bland vu. state, 38 s. u. 29, zti 

VB~ held that a oounty offlalal may be removed from office 

fw of'fla~ alroanduot, thou& he baa not been oc.uvioted 

on sn indictment fop the offense alleged as gmueds for 

ranoval. 

Zp tieV Of the io~e~oin 8UthOF’it%O8 and the above 

ststed faOts YOu -9 r88mttul f 7 rdtised t&t it i8 the 

oplnldaorthi8 de~trartthrt~sbove~tl~trensrotlbn violrter Article 373, vernoats Annotated Penal Code, 

md thrt 8ald b6nSWtica %8 void. It la our f'urthes oplaion that the soneg paid to the said oaanni8sloneo vw Ule@lly paid to him and that it lm Ur duty urder &t&ale a340, 

8Upn, t0 PtAy OV’W t0 hi8 ~OOUZkty til such mCUiOy ille@ily 

roaeivedbyhLn* 

with I'OfUl'Wk438 t0 ,tk8 19@ pPOO8dW8 t0 b8 fb~bWed,afterthe ar8eamntdtmd ha8 beanre~eord#dandpoidfcw, 

38 8 atter to be determlnad by the eoloLc88ione~8* court. 

This depee8tent cPanot mske rugfpstions vith rsierenoe to 

the 8W. 

'i'l'Wt~ttitth0 fOPOgOing~~8ZUWOl'8 JrollP $IA- 

@wP, ire - 

YOUl'8 very truly 

AT!P0mx!f oE!lmu OP TlaAS 

m 

Asdell Willl8ms 

As8%8tsUt
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 61 (Thursday, March 30, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 16499]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7810]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
(AZ-050-05-1230-00; AZA 23275)


Arizona; Recreation Area Closure

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of closure.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Bureau of Land Management is 
closing an area, until further notice, of public land known as the 
Paradise Cove Boat Ramp Recreation Area, or Joe Henry Boat Ramp, 
located on the Colorado River in Yuma County, Arizona. The area 
affected by this closure contains 35 acres, more or less.

San Bernardino Meridian, Arizona

T. 16 S., R. 22 E.,
    Sec. 28, lots 2, 5, and 6, portion of S\1/2\S\1/2\.

EFFECTIVE DATE: Upon first printing in Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ed Perault, Supervisory Outdoor 
Recreation Planner, Yuma Resource Area, 3150 Winsor Avenue, Yuma, 
Arizona 85365, (602) 726-6300.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The closure is in response to concerns of 
public health and safety, excessive illegal dumping, and uncontrollable 
resource degradation. Future public access at Paradise Cove Boat Ramp 
Recreation Area will be considered in comprehensive planning efforts at 
a later date. Violations to this closure are punishable by a fine not 
to exceed $100,000 and/or imprisonment not to exceed 12 months.

    Dated: March 24, 1995.
Maureen A. Merrell,
Assistant District Manager, Administration/Acting District Manager.
[FR Doc. 95-7810 Filed 3-29-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-32-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
JPS Packaging Company and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements. 
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                              1
<SECURITIES>                                        0         
<RECEIVABLES>                                  13,009
<ALLOWANCES>                                      233
<INVENTORY>                                    12,069
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               25,517 
<PP&E>                                         68,363
<DEPRECIATION>                                  1,207
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 56,670
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          10,772
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                           56
<OTHER-SE>                                     41,882
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   56,670
<SALES>                                        20,713 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               20,713
<CGS>                                          18,297
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  18,297
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                2,380
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    36
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                36
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                       36
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .01
        


</TABLE>
We have invested significant amount of time, personal funds and effort over last five years to provide 

the American pool and spa owners a product at a reasonable price point to save thousands of dollars in 

pool and spa operating costs. Furthermore, due to our significant efforts we have maintained the price 

of this product at level that’s affordable to majority of residential pool owners in USA. 

Also, this is a finished end product and we have no ways to share the costs other than passing to the 

American consumer. Furthermore, this product is not part of the Made in China 2025 initiative. 

25% tariff has already had negatively impacted us, resulting in significantly lower sales. Tariffs on future 

imports will affect our ability to maintain current retail prices, result in lower sales and income which 

have major negative financial implications. Therefore, we plead to provide relief from these additional 

tariffs on solar pool ionizers and spare parts to help the American consumer with lower prices and for us 

to stay in business.
#### Robert S. BENDER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 1305-87.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.

Dec. 7, 1988.

Henry L. Burkholder, III, Houston, for appellant.

John B. Holmes, Jr., Dist. Atty., and William J. Delmore, III and Leslie Brock, Asst. Dist. Attys., Houston, Robert Hut-tash, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted upon his plea of guilty of unlawful possession, with intent to deliver, a controlled substance. Punishment was assessed by the trial court at 10 years probation. On appeal the Houston [14th] Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. *Bender v. State,*739 S.W.2d 409 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th] 1987).

Appellant raises two grounds for review. After careful review we refuse appellant’s petition for review. However, as is true in every case where discretionary review is refused, this refusal does not constitute endorsement or adoption of the reasoning employed by the Court of Appeals. *Sheffield v. State,*650 S.W.2d 813 (Tex.Cr.App.1983).

With this understanding, we refuse appellant’s petition for discretionary review.

ONION, P.J., and TEAGUE, J., would grant.
exhibit10-1changecontrol.htm


Exhibit 10.1




AMENDMENT OF


CHANGE OF CONTROL AGREEMENT


 







WHEREAS, EVEREST REINSURANCE COMPANY (the “Company”), EVEREST REINSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC. (“Holdings”), EVEREST RE GROUP, LTD. (“Group”), EVEREST GLOBAL SERVICES, INC. (“Everest Services”) and Joseph V. Taranto (“Taranto”) are parties to an Amended and Restated Change of Control Agreement effective as of January 1, 2009 (the “Change of Control Agreement”), which amended and restated the Change of Control Agreement entered into as of July 15, 1998, and all amendments thereto.


 


WHEREAS, the Change of Control Agreement is intended to track and exist in concert with the Employment Agreement entered into between the Company, Holdings, Group, Everest Services and Taranto and effective as of January 1, 2000 (the “Employment Agreement”), and all amendments thereto.


 


WHEREAS, the Employment Agreement was amended as of September 25, 2009, to reflect an extension of Taranto’s term of employment under the Employment Agreement to continue through December 31, 2010, unless sooner terminated in accordance with the Employment Agreement.


 


WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to a further modification to the Change of Control Agreement and it is now desirable to amend the Change of Control Agreement to reflect consistency with the Employment Agreement.


 


WHEREAS, the Company, Holdings, Group and Everest Services have consented to such amendment.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the Change of Control Agreement is hereby amended, effective as of September 25, 2009, by substituting the following for Paragraph F of Section 3 of the Change of Control Agreement:


 


“F.           This Agreement shall terminate on the earliest of: (i) one year following a Material Change; (ii) termination by Taranto of his employment with Everest Services under circumstances not following a Material Change; (iii) Everest Services’ termination of Taranto’s employment for Due Cause; or (iv) December 31, 2010.  Termination of this Agreement shall not relieve the Everest Parties of their respective obligations to Taranto under this Agreement relating to a Material Change which occurs prior to such termination.”


 


 






  





  











  








 


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this amendment to the Change of Control Agreement as of March 9, 2010.


 







 


 



	
EVEREST REINSURANCE

	  	
EVEREST REINSURANCE COMPANY


	
HOLDINGS, INC.

	  	  
	  	  	  
	  	  	  
	
/S/ SANJOY MUKHERJEE

	  	
/S/ SANJOY MUKHERJEE


	
Sanjoy Mukherjee

	  	
Sanjoy Mukherjee


	
Senior Vice President

	  	
Senior Vice President


	  	  	  
	  	  	  
	  	  	  
	
EVEREST RE GROUP, LTD.

	  	
EVEREST GLOBAL SERVICES, INC.


	  	  	  
	  	  	  
	
/S/ SANJOY MUKHERJEE

	  	
/S/ SANJOY MUKHERJEE


	
Sanjoy Mukherjee

	  	
Sanjoy Mukherjee


	
Senior Vice President

	  	
Senior Vice President


	  	  	  







 



	
/S/ JOSEPH V. TARANTO


	
Joseph V. Taranto