Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 1995 / Notices 16605

Opportunity to Object

Domestic interested parties, as

defined in § 353.2(k)(3), (4), (5), and (6)

of the Department’s regulations, may

object to the Department’s intent to

revoke these antidumping duty orders

and findings or to terminate the

suspended investigations by the last day

of April 1995. Any submission to the

Department must contain the name and

case number of the proceeding and a

statement that explains how the

objecting party qualifies as a domestic

interested party under § 353.2(k)(3), (4),

(5), and (6) of the Department’s

regulations.

Seven copies of such objections

should be submitted to the Assistant

Secretary for Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Room B–099, U.S. Department of

Commerce, Washington, D.C. 20230.

You must also include the pertinent

certification(s) in accordance with

§ 353.31(g) and § 353.31(i) of the

Department’s regulations. In addition,

the Department requests that a copy of

the objection be sent to Michael F.

Panfeld in Room 4203.

This notice is in accordance with 19

CFR 353.25(d)(4)(i).

Dated: March 7, 1995.

Joseph A. Spetrini

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Compliance.

[FR Doc. 95–8002 Filed 3–30–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

[A–122–050]

Racing Plates (Aluminum Horseshoes)

From Canada; Final Results of

Antidumping Duty Administrative

Review

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of final results of

antidumping duty administrative

review.

SUMMARY: In response to a request by a

respondent, the Department of

Commerce (the Department) has

conducted an administrative review of

the antidumping duty finding on racing

plates from Canada. The review covers

one firm and the period February 1,

1993, through January 31, 1994.

Preliminary results were published on

December 19, 1994. Since there were no

comments, we determine that the

dumping margin for Equine Forgings

Limited remains at .01 percent, the

dumping margin from the preliminary

results of review.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 31, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Todd Peterson or Thomas Futtner,

Office of Antidumping Compliance,

Import Administration, International

Trade Administration, U.S. Department

of Commerce, 14th Street and

Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,

DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–4195 or

482–3814, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

The Department published

preliminary results on December 19,

1994. The Department has now

completed the administrative review in

accordance with section 751 of the

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the

Tariff Act).

Scope of the Review

Imports covered by the review are

shipments of racing plates (horseshoes)

that are made of aluminum, may have

cleats or caulks, and come in a variety

of sizes. They are used on race horses,

polo, jumping, hunting, and other

performing horses, as differentiated

from pleasure and work horses. During

the review period such merchandise

was classifiable under Harmonized

Tariff Schedule (HTS) item number

7616.90.00. The HTS item number is

provided for convenience and customs

purposes. The written description

remains dispositive.

Final Results of Review

The Department received no

comments on its preliminary results.

Therefore, the margin from the

preliminary results is the final margin

for the period February 1, 1993, through

January 31, 1994:

Manufacturer/exporter Margin

(percent)

Equine Forgings Limited ........... .014

Furthermore, the following deposit

requirements will be effective for all

shipments of the subject merchandise

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,

for consumption on or after the

publication date of these final results of

administrative review, as provided for

by section 751(a)(1) of the Tariff Act: (1)

The cash deposit rate for the reviewed

firm will be that firm’s rate established

in the final results of this administrative

review. Since the rate for Equine

Forgings Limited is de minimis, there

will be a cash deposit of zero on

shipments from this firm; (2) for

previously reviewed or investigated

companies not listed above, the cash

deposit rate will continue to be the

company-specific rate published for the

most recent period; (3) if the exporter is

not a firm covered in this review, or the

original less-than-fair value (LTFV)

investigation, but the manufacturer is,

the cash deposit rate will be the rate

established for the most recent period

for the manufacturer of the

merchandise; and (4) the ‘‘all others’’

rate will remain at 6.77 percent, the ‘‘all

others’’ rate established in the LTFV

investigation.

These deposit requirements shall

remain in effect until publication of the

final results of the next administrative

review.

This notice serves as a final reminder

to importers of their responsibility

under 19 CFR 353.26 to file a certificate

regarding the reimbursement of

antidumping duties prior to liquidation

of the relevant entries during this

review period. Failure to comply with

this requirement could result in the

Secretary’s presumption that

reimbursement of antidumping duties

occurred and the subsequent assessment

of double antidumping duties.

This administrative review and notice

are in accordance with section 751(a)(1)

of the Tariff Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)(1))

and 19 CFR 353.22.

Dated: March 22, 1995.

Susan G. Esserman,

Assistant Secretary for Import

Administration.

[FR Doc. 95–8012 Filed 3–30–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–M

[A–570–804]

Sparklers from the People’s Republic

of China; Final Results of Antidumping

Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of Final Results of

Antidumping Duty Administrative

Review.

SUMMARY: On October 18, 1994, the

Department of Commerce (the

Department) published the preliminary

results of its administrative review of

the antidumping duty order on sparklers

from the People’s Republic of China

(PRC) (59 FR 52510). The review was

requested for one manufacturer,

Guangxi Native Produce Import and

Export Corporation, Beihai Fireworks

and Firecrackers Branch (Guangxi), of

the subject merchandise to the United

States and the review period June 1,

1992 through May 31, 1993.

We gave interested parties an

opportunity to comment on our

preliminary results. We received no