alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4757

Scosche Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 64 (Tuesday, April 4, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17064-17065]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8158]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Western Bancorporation, Inc.; Notice of Application to Engage de 
novo in Permissible Nonbanking Activities

    The company listed in this notice has filed an application under 
Sec.  225.23(a)(1) of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.23(a)(1)) 
for the Board's approval under section 4(c)(8) of the Bank Holding 
Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843(c)(8)) and Sec.  225.21(a) of Regulation 
[[Page 17065]] Y (12 CFR 225.21(a)) to commence or to engage de novo, 
either directly or through a subsidiary, in a nonbanking activity that 
is listed in Sec.  225.25 of Regulation Y as closely related to banking 
and permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, 
such activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    The application is available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. Once the application has been accepted 
for processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing on the question whether consummation of the proposal can 
``reasonably be expected to produce benefits to the public, such as 
greater convenience, increased competition, or gains in efficiency, 
that outweigh possible adverse effects, such as undue concentration of 
resources, decreased or unfair competition, conflicts of interests, or 
unsound banking practices.'' Any request for a hearing on this question 
must be accompanied by a statement of the reasons a written 
presentation would not suffice in lieu of a hearing, identifying 
specifically any questions of fact that are in dispute, summarizing the 
evidence that would be presented at a hearing, and indicating how the 
party commenting would be aggrieved by approval of the proposal.
    Comments regarding the application must be received at the Reserve 
Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than 
April 18, 1995.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (James M. Lyon, Vice 
President) 250 Marquette Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480:
    1. Western Bancorporation, Inc., Duluth, Minnesota; to engage de 
novo through its subsidiary Premier Credit Corporation, Duluth, 
Minnesota, in industrial banking activities, and the purchase of dealer 
paper on both recourse and non-recourse bases, at a discount from 
automobile dealers and other merchants who sell at retail to the 
public, pursuant to Sec.  225.25(b)(2) of the Board's Regulation Y. 
These activities will be conducted throughout the states of Minnesota 
and Wisconsin.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 29, 
1995.
William W. Wiles,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-8158 Filed 4-3-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5796

Tianhai Electric North America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Nebraska Court of Appeals Memorandum Opinions

NOT Selected for Posting to Court Website

(released the week prior to September 21, 2021)

The following memorandum opinions were filed by the Nebraska Court of 

Appeals and can be viewed using SSCALES:

A-21-146 State v. Tafoya

The above-listed memorandum opinions can be viewed online through the 

appellate court case search available by subscription through Nebraska.gov:

http://www.nebraska.gov/subscriber/.

Current subscribers to Nebraska.gov can search appellate court cases here:

https://www.nebraska.gov/courts/sccales/.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 50 (Wednesday, March 15, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14002-14003]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6285]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 14003]]

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Fieldbus Foundation

    Notice is hereby given that, on December 8, 1994, supplemented by 
filings of December 20, 1994 and December 22, 1994, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the Fieldbus Foundation 
(``Fieldbus'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing certain 
changes. Specifically, the December 8, 1994 notification advises that 
effective September 23, 1994, InterOperable System Project Foundation 
(``ISPF'') merged with WorldFip North America, Inc.; ISPF was the 
surviving entity, changed its name to Fieldbus Foundation 
(``Fieldbus'') and identified the following new members: Allen-Bradley 
Company, Inc., Highland Heights, OH; Allen-Bradley Japan Co., Ltd, 
Tokyo, Japan; Bailey Controls Co., Wickliffe, OH; E.I. duPont De 
Nemours & Co., Inc., Wilmington, DE; Honeywell, Inc., Phoenix, AZ; K.K. 
CODIX, Tokyo, Japan; Nagano Keiki Seisakusho, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan; 
Niigata Masoneilan Co., Ltd., Chiba, Japan; Proctor & Gamble Company, 
Cincinnati, OH; Square D Company, Knightdale, NC; Tokyo Keiso Co., 
Ltd., Tokyo, Japan; Uticor Technology, Inc., Bettendorf, IA; and 
Yamatake-Honeywell Co., Ltd. Tokyo, Japan. The December 20, 1994, 
notification discloses that DKK Corporation, Tokyo, Japan; Glaxo, Inc., 
Research Triangle Park, NC; and Presys Instrumentos E Sistemas Ltda, 
San Paulo, Brazil, have become new members. Lastly, the December 22, 
1994, notification discloses that Pacific Avionics Corp., Redmond, WA 
has become a new member. These notifications were filed for the purpose 
of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
    No other changes have been made in either membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and Fieldbus intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On May 7, 1993, Fieldbus filed its original notification pursuant 
to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a 
notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on 
September 23, 1993 (58 Fed. Reg. 49529).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on July 5, 
1994. This notice has not yet been published in the Federal Register.
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 95-6285 Filed 3-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jerrod A. LEWIS, Appellant.

No. WD 45513.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Sept. 28, 1993.

*225Robert E. Steele, Asst. Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before BRECKENRIDGE, P.J., and KENNEDY and LOWENSTEIN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his jury conviction for first degree burglary pursuant to section 569.160, RSMo 1986, and the sentence of five years in jail.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Dean M.
Leavitt, certify that:

1.  I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of U.S. Wireless Data, Inc.;

2.
Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The
registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and

5. The
registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: February
18, 2005

/s/ Dean M.
Leavitt
    Dean M. Leavitt
    Chairman of the Board
    (Former Chief Executive Officer
     and Acting Principal Executive Officer)

---
Exhibit 99.1

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

May 12, 2010

Board of Directors

Killbuck Bancshares, Inc.

We have
reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Killbuck Bancshares, Inc. and its subsidiary as of March 31, 2010, and the related consolidated statements of income for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, and the
consolidated statement of changes in stockholders equity for the three-month period ended March 31, 2010 and the consolidated statements of cash flows for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. These consolidated
financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management.

We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as
a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be
made to the accompanying financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles U.S. generally accepted.

We have
previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2009, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in
stockholders equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated February 25, 2010 we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ S.R. SNODGRASS, A.C.     
|                             
|S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.         
|626 North Fourth Street      
|Steubenville, Ohio 43952-1982
|Phone: 740-282-2771          
|Facsimile: 740-282-1606
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-10409

American Mitsuba Corporation:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because granting the request would undermine the objective of the Section 

301 investigation.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
PUBLIC VERSION
$[*********] [******]

$[*********]

INPUT

20.0

$[*********]

[******]

[******]

0.05

PUBLIC VERSION
Consistent with USTR's Section 301 notice, OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. requests

confidential treatment for the information designated as business confidential in this submission. Such

information consists of information that would not customarily be released to the public, including

business or trade secrets regarding production costs and processes, data on sales, product characteristics

customers, destinations, and other product, sales, and cost-related business secrets. Business confidential

information has been indicated herein by enclosing it in single brackets (“[ ]”). A public version of these

comments is also being filed with all confidential information removed.

OMRON in the US is the only designer of this product and only supplier of this component.

COVER,AST POWER is a molded plastic switch, and is used only for automotive purposes to house

switches which raise and lower windows, of which is an OEM-specified dimension. It is only used for

further assembly of components which go into domestic automobile production, which is specified by

auto manufacturer.

This product is not a target of the US Administration's 301 investigation regarding Intellectual Property

concerns. This is not a concern to IP transfer and impressment. This product contains no IP of interest

related to autonomous vehicle production.

The tariff action ultimately poses a risk of significant damage to OMRON, the domestic automobile

industry, and ultimately the US consumer as a increase in price. Like in the case of similar approvals for

vehicle components at the HTS level, OMRON views this product in the same manner. Immediate

movement of production to a US manufacturer or another country would pose significant re-tooling

costs, significant amounts of time, and approvals pertaining to consumer automobile safety standards are

costly and would take a significant amount of time to obtain.

OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. believes that CBP can easily exclude the COVER,AST

POWER in question based solely on the product description. The following are draft CBP exclusion

instructions:

"COVER,AST POWER rectangular raised molding with two corners notched 45% and two semi-circle

carveouts molded into each side; Plastic cover for POWER WINDOW SWITCH - made of plastic resin

-ABS Dimensions 132.6 mm x 53.5mm x31.6mm."

This information will be contained on the invoice from the supplier listing the fact that it is a sealed

miniature basic switch with the above features.

PUBLIC VERSION
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 57 (Friday, March 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15585]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7269]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Information Collections Under Review

    The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has been sent the 
following collection(s) of information proposals for review under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) and 
the Paperwork Reduction Reauthorization Act since the last list was 
published. Entries are grouped into submission categories, with each 
entry containing the following information:

(1) the title of the form/collection;
(2) the agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of the 
Department sponsoring the collection.
(3) who will be asked or required to respond, as well as a brief 
abstract;
(4) an estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount of 
time estimated for an average respondent to respond:
(5) an estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated with 
the collection; and,
(6) an indication as to whether Section 3504(h) of Public Law 96-511 
applies.

    Comments and/or suggestions regarding the item(s) contained in this 
notice, especially regarding the estimated public burden and associated 
response time, should be directed to the OMB reviewer, Mr. Jeff Hill on 
(202) 395-7340 and to the Department of Justice's Clearance Officer, 
Mr. Robert B. Briggs, on (202) 514-4319. If you anticipate commenting 
on a form/collection, but find that time to prepare such comments will 
prevent you from prompt submission, you should notify the OMB reviewer 
and the Department of Justice Clearance Officer of your intent as soon 
as possible. Written comments regarding the burden estimate or any 
other aspect of the collection may be submitted to Office of 
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 
Washington, DC 20503, and to Mr. Robert B. Briggs, Department of 
Justice Clearance Officer, Systems Policy Staff/Information Resources 
Management/Justice Management Division, Suite 850, WCTR, Washington, DC 
20530.

Revision of a Currently Approved Collection

(1) 1994 National Survey of Prosecutors.
(2) NSP-1. Bureau of Justice Statistics, States Department of Justice.
(3) Primary = State, Local, or Tribunal Government. Others = None. This 
biennial survey collects data on the resources, policies, and practices 
of local prosecutors from a nationally representative sample of 300 
chief litigating prosecutors in State Court Systems.
(4) 300 annual respondents at 1.0 hours per response.
(5) 150 annual burden hours.
(6) Not applicable under Section 3504(h) of Public Law 96-511.

    Public comment on this item is encouraged.

    Dated: March 20, 1995.
Robert B. Briggs,
Department Clearance Officer, United States Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 95-7269 Filed 3-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-18-M