alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 21, 2024

No. 04-23-00318-CR

IN RE Isaias PAZ-ESTRADA, et al.

Original Proceeding1

ORDER

On April 4, 2023, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus. On June 6, 2023, we 

received notice that relator Alberto Garcia Galvan’s request for relief is now moot. Accordingly, 

we DISMISS relator Galvan’s request for relief as moot.

As for the remaining seventeen relators, after considering the petition, real party in 

interest’s response, relators’ reply, amicus briefing, and this record, this court concludes relators 

are not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

It is so ORDERED on February 21, 2024.

_____________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 21st day of February, 2024.

_____________________________

Tommy Stolhandske, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of eighteen civil bond forfeiture cases involving the State of Texas and the following 

defendants and their trial cause numbers: Isaias Paz-Estrada, Cause No. 1096; Jorge Luis de la Cruz-Cordova, Cause 

No. 1110; Marcelo Hernandez-Pablo, Cause No. 1111; Diego Villarreal Castellanos, Cause No. 1112; Jose Domingo 

Palacio Lazarin, Cause No. 1113; Oribel Martinez Leon, Cause No. 1220; Roque Alvarez Arias, Cause No. 1242; 

Pedro Marcos Ruiz, Cause No. 1246; Romario Lopez Jimenez, Cause No. 1249; Alberto Garcia Galvan, Cause No. 

1254; Walter Gonzalez Rueda, Cause No. 1256; Jorge Luis Olalde-Gustavo; Cause No. 1275; Luis Adrian MedinaGonzalez, Cause No. 1277; Joel Santiago Zamora, Cause No. 1278; Juan Ignasio Gonzalez Abundis, Cause No. 1279;

Carlos Oviedo Oviedo, Cause No. 1280;Oscar Gerado Posadas-Garcias, Cause No. 1283; and Abenmar Cordova 

Cacho, Cause No. 1311 all pending in the County Court, Kinney County, Texas, the Honorable David E. Garcia

presiding.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4955

Apergy ESP Systems, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 56 (Thursday, March 23, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15308]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7169]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree

    Notice is hereby given that a proposed Consent Decree and 
Settlement in United States v. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., 
Civil Action No. 95-CV-70860-DT (E.D. Mich.), entered into by the 
United States, and Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co. (``3M''), was 
lodged on March 8, 1995, with the United States District Court for the 
Eastern District of Michigan. The proposed Consent Decree and 
Settlement resolves certain claims of the United States under Sections 
104 and 107 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, 
and Liability Act (``CERCLA''), 42 U.S.C. Sec. Sec. 9604 and 9607, with 
respect to the Montie Drums Site in Belleville, Michigan. Under the 
Consent Decree, 3M will pay the United States $1,100,000, representing 
one hundred percent of the government's claims for past response costs. 
In addition, 3M will pay the United States $50,000 to settle civil 
penalty claims arising from its alleged failure to fully and accurately 
respond to information requests from the United States Environmental 
Protection Agency.
    The Department of Justice will receive comments relating to the 
proposed Consent Decree and Settlement for 30 days following 
publication of this Notice. Comments should be addressed to the 
Assistant Attorney General, for the Environment and Natural Resources 
Division, Department of Justice, P.O. Box 7611, Ben Franklin Station, 
Washington, D.C. 20044, and should refer to United States v. Minnesota 
Mining and Manufacturing Co., D.J. Ref. No. 90-11-2-834. The proposed 
Consent Decree and Settlement may be examined at the Office of the 
United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan, 211 West 
Fort Street, Suite 2300 Detroit, MI 48226, the Region V Office of the 
United States Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson 
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604; and at the Consent Decree Library, 
1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005, (202) 624-0892. 
A copy of the proposed Consent Decree may be obtained in person or by 
mail from the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, 
Washington, D.C. 20005. In requesting a copy, please enclose a check in 
the amount of $6.00 (25 cents per page for reproduction costs), payable 
to the Consent Decree Library.
 Joel M. Gross,
Acting Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 95-7169 Filed 3-22-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-4510

Williams Controls Incorporated: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

April 12, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6427

Sims Group USA Holdings Corporation, dba Sims Metal Management: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_04.15.19.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.2


            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


The Board of Directors
General Growth Properties, Inc.:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-11067, 333-15907, 333-17021, 333-23035, 333-37247, 333-37383,
333-41603, 333-58045, 333-68505, 333-76379, 333-76757, 333-82134, 333-82569,
333-84419, 333-88813, 333-88819, 333-91621, 333-115693, 333-115694, and
333-120373) on Form S-3 and the registration statements (Nos. 33-79372,
333-07241, 333-11237, 333-28449, 333-74461, 333-79737, 333-105882, and
333-125605) on Form S-8 of General Growth Properties, Inc. of our report dated
February 27, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of
GGP/Homart, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the
related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income,
stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2006, our report dated February 27, 2007,
with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of GGP/Homart II L.L.C. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated
statements of income and comprehensive income, changes in members' capital and
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
2006, and our report dated February 27, 2007, with respect to the consolidated
balance sheets of GGP - TRS L.L.C. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and
2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in members'
capital and cash flows for the years then ended, which reports appear in the
December 31, 2006 annual report on Form 10-K of General Growth Properties, Inc.


KPMG LLP


Chicago, Illinois
February 27, 2007
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6296

OSRAM Opto Semiconductors, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China. 

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         180,633
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,014,146
<ALLOWANCES>                                   372,986
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,657,514
<PP&E>                                      24,564,070
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,645,396
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              99,172,097
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,675,873
<BONDS>                                     42,181,733
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        35,388
<OTHER-SE>                                  45,279,103
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                99,172,097
<SALES>                                     56,462,757
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            56,462,757
<CGS>                                       42,470,937
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               42,470,937
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,499,501
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,236,099
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,148,013
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,148,013
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,148,013
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07


</TABLE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 26, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-6031

Peabody Energy Corporation:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-5442

Radio Systems Corp: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 17

- 00128

- CR

Joshua SANCHEZ

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR7686

Honorable Lorina I. Rummel, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI

, JUSTICE MARTINEZ , AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED January 24, 2018.

_____________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5163 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to allow for the use of telehealth 

in substance use disorder treatment, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 4, 2023 

Mr. TRONE (for himself and Mr. FITZPATRICK) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in 

addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to allow for the 

use of telehealth in substance use disorder treatment, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Telehealth Response 

5 for E-prescribing Addiction Therapy Services Act’’ or 

6 ‘‘TREATS Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5163 IH

1 SEC. 2. TELEHEALTH FOR SUBSTANCE USE DISORDER 

2 TREATMENT. 

3 Section 309(e)(2) of the Controlled Substances Act 

4 (21 U.S.C. 829(e)(2)) is amended— 

5 (1) in subparagraph (A)(i)— 

6 (A) by striking ‘‘at least 1 in-person med7 ical evaluation’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘at 

8 least— 

9 ‘‘(I) 1 in-person medical evalua10 tion’’; and 

11 (B) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(II) for purposes of prescribing 

13 a controlled substance in schedule III, 

14 IV, or V that is approved by the Food 

15 and Drug Administration for the 

16 treatment of opioid use disorder 

17 (other than methadone), 1 telehealth 

18 evaluation; or’’; and 

19 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

20 ‘‘(D) The term ‘telehealth evaluation’ 

21 means a medical evaluation that is conducted in 

22 accordance with applicable Federal and State 

23 laws by a practitioner (other than a phar24 macist) who is at a location remote from the 

25 patient and is communicating with the patient, 

26 or a health care professional who is treating the 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 5163 IH

1 patient, using a telecommunications system re2 ferred to in section 1834(m) of the Social Secu3 rity Act that includes audio-only or audio and 

4 video equipment permitting two-way, real-time 

5 interactive communication between the patient 

6 and distant site practitioner or health care pro7 fessional who is treating the patient.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit
32.1
 
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of JayHawk Energy, Inc. a Colorado
corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Lindsay E. Gorrill, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies
to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
JayHawk Energy, Inc., and will be retained by JayHawk Energy, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
 
 /s/
      Lindsay GorrillLindsay
      Gorrill
                Chief
      Executive Officer
                May
      8, 2009