alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                EXHIBIT 99(B)(i)




                                                               February 21, 1997



The Board of Directors
Greenwood Trust Company and
Wilmington Trust Company:

At your request, we have performed the procedure listed below with respect to
the accounting records of Greenwood Trust Company ("GTC"), relating to the
servicing procedures performed by GTC as Servicer under Section 3.06(b) of the
Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement"), dated February 1, 1993, for
Discover Card Trust 1993B.  This report is solely for your information and is
not to be referred to by, or distributed for any purpose to, anyone other than
Wilmington Trust Company as Trustee, Investor Certificateholders, or management
of GTC.  The procedure we performed is as follows:

-    Compared the amounts set forth in each monthly certificate forwarded by
     the Servicer, pursuant to Section 3.04(b) of the Agreement, during the
     calendar year 1996 to the Servicer's computer-generated Monthly
     Preliminary Calculations report, and found them to be in agreement.

Because the above procedure does not constitute an audit conducted in
accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, we do not express an
opinion on any of the items referred to above.  Had we performed additional
procedures, or had we conducted an audit of the monthly certificates in
accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, further matters might
have come to our attention that would have been reported to you.  This report
relates only to the items specified above and does not extend to any financial
statements of GTC taken as a whole for any date or period.


/s/

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Exhibit 32




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)




In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of USA Technologies, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2011 (the “Report”), I, George R. Jensen, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ George R. Jensen, Jr.George R. Jensen, Jr.Chief Executive Officer





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)




In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of USA Technologies, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2011 (the “Report”), I, David M. DeMedio, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ David M. DeMedioDavid M. DeMedioChief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

TWEETER HOME ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Tweeter Home Entertainment Group, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2002
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Joseph G. McGuire, Senior Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                                            
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition of the Company as of December 31, 2002 and
results of operations of the Company for the three and nine months ended
December 31, 2002.

|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|By:  /s/ Joseph G. McGuire                                       
|                                                                 
|                                                                 
|                                                                 
|Joseph McGuire, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                                                                 
|February 14, 2003
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5253

United Scope LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_05.09.19.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4863

Arrowhead Electrical Products, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5026

Enerpac:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
CERTIFICATIONS

I, Donald C. Schmitt, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Next Generation
Technology Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date.

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: November 3, 2003

                                         BY:  /S/ DONALD C. SCHMITT
                                         ------------------------------
                                         NAME: Donald C. Schmitt
                                         TITLE: CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5056

Scosche Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4904

Arrowhead Electrical Products, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Deep Field Technologies, Inc. ("the
Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark
Meller, President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:


     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
          the Company.



                               Date: May 15, 2006



                                       By /s/ Mark Meller
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Mark Meller
                                         President, Chief Executive Officer and
                                         Chief Financial Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LINO REYNALDO CABRERA

MENDOZA, AKA Alberto Cortez Valencia,

Petitioner,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney

General,

Respondent. No. 19

- 73308

Agency No. A205

- 311

- 124

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 29, 2022 * *

Pasadena, California

Before: PAEZ and WATFORD, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT, ** * District Judge.

Lino Reynaldo Cabrera Mendoza, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions

for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*** The Honorable Richard D. Bennett, United States District Judge for

the District of Maryland, sitting by designation. 

# FIL ED

AUG 2 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALSPage 2 of 3

denial of h is applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protect ion under

the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We deny the petition.

1. Cabrera Mendoza waived review of the denial of his claims for asylum

and withholding of removal by failing to address the agency’s dispositive reasons

for denying relie f. With respect to asylum, Cabrera Mendoza did not challenge the

agency’s finding that he was subject to the one

- year time bar and had not

demonstrate d changed country conditions to overcome the bar. See 8 U.S.C.

§ 1158(a)(2)(B) , (D)

.

W ith r espect to withholding of removal, Cabrera Mendoza did not challenge

the agency’s finding that his proposed particular social group of “Mexicans

returning from the United States, who are parents of minor United States children,

perceived to have money, and which the Mexican government is unable or

unwilling to protect from drug cartels and/or associated criminal elements” is not

cognizable. He also failed to challenge the agency’s adverse credibility finding

.

We lack jurisdiction to consider the new proposed particular social group that

Cabrera Mendoza a sserts before us

— “owner of small business operated by young

woman”

—

because he failed to raise it before the agency

, and it is therefore

unexhausted

. See Barron v. Ashcroft , 358 F.3d 674, 677 ( 9th Cir. 2004).

2. Cabrera Mendoza failed to challenge the agency’s dispositive finding

that he i s ineligible for protection under CAT because he did not demonstrate thatPage 3 of 3

the Mexican government would participate or acquiesce in any future torture

. Any

challenge to the merits of the agency’s CAT ruling is thus waived. Lopez

- Vasquez

v. Holder , 706 F.3d 1072, 1079

– 80 (9th Cir. 2013).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6005

Aisin World Corp. of America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

77 

CAF 14-02198 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, DEJOSEPH, AND SCUDDER, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF THOMAS W. MURTAUGH, JR., 

PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ROSE M. GIBSON, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

----------------------------------------------- 

IN THE MATTER OF ROSE M. GIBSON, 

PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

V

 

THOMAS W. MURTAUGH, JR., RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. 

(APPEAL NO. 3.)

 

TRACY L. PUGLIESE, CLINTON, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT AND PETITIONERAPPELLANT. 

JOHN J. RASPANTE, UTICA, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT AND RESPONDENTRESPONDENT.

PETER J. DIGIORGIO, JR., ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILDREN, UTICA. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Herkimer County

(Anthony J. Garramone, J.H.O.), entered November 19, 2014 in a

proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order granted

Thomas W. Murtaugh, Jr. sole custody of the parties’ children. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Matter of Gibson v Murtaugh ([appeal No. 1]

___ AD3d ___ [Mar. 18, 2016]).

Entered: March 18, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court