alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rodney Skinner, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Linakis, J.), rendered May 22, 1987, convicting him of arson in the third degree, criminal mischief in the third degree, and reckless endangerment of property, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

*481The defendant’s conviction stems from an incident involving a car which was allegedly set on fire on August 22, 1986, in Queens County. The sole issue we are called on to determine is whether the evidence adduced at trial was legally sufficient to establish that the defendant was criminally responsible for this fire. Viewing the circumstantial evidence upon which the verdict was predicated in a light most favorable to the prosecution *(People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), and indulging in all reasonable inferences in the prosecution’s favor *(see, People v Ford,*66 NY2d 428), we conclude that it was.

An eyewitness testified that immediately preceding the fire, he observed the defendant in the vicinity of the subject car in the company of a man who was carrying an antifreeze container which smelled of gasoline. The witness watched this man walk toward the car and thereafter saw "flame and smoke”. The defendant then waved to the man and both fled in the defendant’s car. The testimony of a New York City Fire Marshal eliminated the possibility that the fire was caused either by a natural event or by an accident. Furthermore, the defendant had been suspended from his job that day by the owner of the car and had a prior antagonistic relationship with him. In light of the foregoing, we find that any reasonable hypothesis of the defendant’s innocence was excluded *(see, People v Betancourt,*68 NY2d 707), and that the jury reasonably concluded that the defendant’s guilt was established beyond a reasonable doubt *(see, People v Flick, 147*AD2d 957; *People v Landers,*107 AD2d 1022; *cf., People v Zurzolo,*143 AD2d 286). Bracken, J. P., Rubin, Rosenblatt and Miller, JJ., concur.
#### Willie Lee HILL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 40154.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Sept. 6, 1988.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Nov. 1, 1988.

Joseph H. Locascio, Sp. Public Defender, Daniel C. Miller, Asst. Sp. Public Defender, Kansas City, Mo., for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Christopher M. Kehr, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Mo., for respondent.

Before CLARK, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and FENNER, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from denial of Rule 27.26 motion for post-conviction relief.

Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
EXHIBIT 99.2

                             U.S WIRELESS DATA, INC.

                             SECRETARY'S CERTIFICATE

                      Resolutions of the Board of Directors
                         Adopted as of November 21, 1997


         The undersigned,  Robert E. Robichaud,  as the duly appointed Secretary
of U.S. Wireless Data, Inc., a Colorado corporation (the "Corporation"),  hereby
certifies that the following resolutions were validly adopted at a duly convened
meeting of the Board of Directors of the Corporation  held on November 21, 1998,
and that the resolutions have not been modified, amended or rescinded and remain
in full force and effect as of the date of this Certificate.

                  RESOLVED,  that the Company  enter into an agreement  with its
                  Chief Executive Officer, Evon Kelly, to provide Mr. Kelly with
                  a right of  indemnification  for any excess tax  liability  he
                  incurs  as a  result  of the  grant  to  him of  non-qualified
                  options  to  purchase  up to 600,000  shares of the  Company's
                  Common  Stock at $1.00 per share as of  August 6,  1997,  over
                  what  his tax  liability  would  have  been if he had  instead
                  received qualified options at that time;

                  FURTHER RESOLVED,  that the President of the Company is hereby
                  authorized  to  execute  such an  agreement  on  behalf of the
                  Company on  substantially  the terms and conditions  described
                  above,  in such form as the  President  shall  approve  by his
                  signature thereon; and

                  FURTHER RESOLVED, that the appropriate officers of the Company
                  are  hereby  authorized  and  directed  to take  such  further
                  actions  and  execute  such   documents  as  are   reasonable,
                  necessary and appropriate to carry out the intent of the Board
                  of Directors as expressed in the foregoing resolutions.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  I have signed this Certificate as Secretary of the
Corporation this 23rd day of November, 1998.


                                                 /s/ Robert E. Robichaud  
                                                 ---------------------------
                                                 Robert E. Robichaud,
                                                 Secretary

                                                                   BOD: 11/21/97
EX-10.11






Revolving Note




$71,500,000.00 June 30, 2011



For Value Received, the undersigned (the “Borrower”), hereby promises to pay to the
order of KeyBank National Association (the “Lender”), on the Maturity Date (as defined in
the Credit Agreement referred to below) the principal amount of Seventy-One Million Five
Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($71,500,000.00), or such lesser principal amount of Loans
(as defined in the Credit Agreement referred to below) payable by Borrower to Lender on such
Revolving Credit Termination Date under that certain Credit Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2011,
among Borrower, Lenders from time to time party thereto, KeyBank National Association, as
Agent and a Lender (as amended, restated, extended, supplemented or otherwise modified in writing
from time to time, the “Agreement;” the terms defined therein being used herein as therein
defined).



Borrower promises to pay interest on the unpaid principal amount of each Revolving Credit Loan
from the date of such Revolving Credit Loan until such principal amount is paid in full, at such
interest rates, and payable at such times as are specified in the Agreement.



All payments of principal and interest shall be made to Agent for the account of Lender in
United States dollars in immediately available funds at Agent’s Principal Office.



If any amount is not paid in full when due hereunder, such unpaid amount shall bear interest,
to be paid upon demand, from the due date thereof until the date of actual payment (and before as
well as after judgment) computed at the Post-Default Rate set forth in the Agreement.



This Revolving Note is one of the “Revolving Credit Notes” referred to in the Agreement.
Reference is hereby made to the Agreement for rights and obligations of payment and prepayment,
events of default and the right of Lender to accelerate the maturity hereof upon the occurrence of
such events. Revolving Credit Loans made by Lender shall be evidenced by one or more loan accounts
or records maintained by Lender in the ordinary course of business. Lender may also attach
schedules to this Revolving Credit Note and endorse thereon the date, amount and maturity of its
Revolving Credit Loans and payments with respect thereto.



Borrower, for itself, its successors and assigns, hereby waives diligence, presentment,
protest and demand and notice of protest, demand, dishonor and non-payment of this Revolving Credit
Note.



Borrower agrees to pay all collection expenses, court costs and attorney costs (whether or not
litigation is commenced) which may be incurred by Lender in connection with the collection or
enforcement of this Revolving Credit Note, all as further set forth in the Agreement.



THIS REVOLVING NOTE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF NEW YORK.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Borrower has caused this Revolving Credit Note to be duly executed on
the date first above written.



Grubb & Ellis Healthcare REIT II Holdings, LP



By Grubb & Ellis Healthcare REIT II, Inc.,


Its General Partner



By: /s/ Shannon K S Johnson

Printed Name: Shannon K S Johnson

Its: Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C.SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Shoe Carnival, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending January
31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Mark L. Lemond, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. |  | The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and                               
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. |  | The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the Company.

|Date:   April
      16, 2009 | By:                           | /s/ Mark L.
      Lemond
|---------------------------- | ----------------------------- | ------------------------
|                             | Mark
      L. Lemond         
|                             | President and                
|                             | Chief
      Executive Officer

---
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5122

Radio Systems Corp:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_5-30-2019.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
### NUMBER 13

- 18

- 0 0 276

- C V

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

IN R E ZINA M. BURKETT

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

ORDER

Before Justices Rodriguez, Contreras, and Hinojosa

Order Per Curiam

Relator Zina M. Burkett f iled a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause

seeking to compel the trial court to rule on a motion to enforce child support. The Court

requests that the real party in interest, Jason A. Burkett , or any others whose interest

would be directly affected by the relief sought, file a response to the petition for writ of

mandamus on or before the expiration of ten days from the date of this order. See T EX

.

R. A PP

. P . 52.2, 52.4, 52.8.

PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed this

29th day of May , 201 8

.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-3040

Carbon Block Technology, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXHIBIT 99.3

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Enacted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the annual report of Enbridge Inc. (the “Corporation”) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Patrick D. Daniel, President & Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.            The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.            The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

 

Dated at Calgary, Alberta, this 21st day of February, 2012.

 

 
| “signed”                             |   |
|------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Patrick D. Daniel                              |   |
| President & Chief   Executive Officer |   |

 

----
3XEOLF9HUVLRQRI%&,

380392/87(&$67,1*35(6685(&217$,1,1*67$,1/(6667((/



3,$==$52%(57

35,&(3803&203$1<

2WKHU

12

3XEOLF9HUVLRQRI%&,


12

12

 .*



,03257,1*7+,63$57)520&+,1$&2676
EXHIBIT 12.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 302(A) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Raya Asher, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Magal Security System
Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The company's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the company, including its consolidated
Subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [Reserved]

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the company's most recent fiscal
quarter (the company's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
company's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: July 14, 2006

/s/ Raya Asher*
---------------
Raya Asher
Chief Financial Officer

     * The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at
the Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 67 (Friday, April 7, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17776-17777]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8588]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED

Procurement List; Addition

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled.

ACTION: Addition to the Procurement List.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action adds to the Procurement List a service to be 
furnished by nonprofit agencies employing persons who are blind or have 
other severe disabilities.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 8, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled, Crystal Square 3, Suite 403, 1735 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Arlington, Virginia 22202-3461.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Milkman (703) 603-7740.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On February 24, 1995, the Committee for 
Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled published 
notice (60 FR 10373) of proposed addition to the Procurement List. 
After consideration of the material presented to it concerning 
capability of qualified nonprofit agencies to provide the service, fair 
market price, and impact of the addition on the current or most recent 
contractors, the Committee has determined that the service listed below 
are suitable for procurement by the Federal Government under 41 U.S.C. 
46-48c and 41 CFR 51-2.4. I certify that the following action will not 
have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. 
The major factors considered for this certification were:
    1. The action will not result in any additional reporting, 
recordkeeping or other compliance requirements for small entities other 
than the small organizations that will furnish the service to the 
Government.
    2. The action does not appear to have a severe economic impact on 
current contractors for the service. [[Page 17777]] 
    3. The action will result in authorizing small entities to furnish 
the service to the Government.
    4. There are no known regulatory alternatives which would 
accomplish the objectives of the Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act (41 U.S.C. 46-
48c) in connection with the service proposed for addition to the 
Procurement List.
    Accordingly, the following service is hereby added to the 
Procurement List:

Janitorial/Custodial
Jack Brooks Federal Building, U.S. Post Office and Courthouse
Willow and Broadway Streets
Beaumont, Texas

    This action does not affect current contracts awarded prior to the 
effective date of this addition or options exercised under those 
contracts.
Beverly L. Milkman,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 95-8588 Filed 4-6-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-33-P
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                      SUBSIDIARIES OF U.S. CAN CORPORATION


-----------------------------------   --------------------------  --------------
Name                                  Place of Organization       Trade Name
----                                  ---------------------       ----------

-----------------------------------   --------------------------  --------------
United States Can Company             State of Delaware, U.S.A.   U.S. Can
-----------------------------------   --------------------------  --------------
USC May Verpackungen Holding, Inc.    State of Delaware, U.S.A.   n/a
-----------------------------------   --------------------------  --------------
U.S.C. Europe N.V.                    Netherlands Antilles        n/a
-----------------------------------   --------------------------  --------------
U.S.C. Europe Netherlands B.V.        Netherlands                 n/a
-----------------------------------   --------------------------  --------------
Note: U.S.C. Europe Netherlands B.V. has nine foreign subsidiaries engaged in
metal can manufacturing in Europe, and also owns 36.5% of Formametal S.A., an
Argentine metal can manufacturer. USC May Verpackungen Holding, Inc. owns May
Verpackungen GmbH & Co. KG and its related companies.