alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.23

 

Agreements substantially in the form attached have been entered into between the Company and non-employee directors with appropriate changes to reflect:

 

·      Name

·      Date

·      Number of Shares

 











 

STOCK AWARD AGREEMENT

 

This Stock Award Agreement (“Agreement”), dated as of                       , is between ESCO Corporation, an Oregon corporation (the “Company”), and                                       (“Director”).

 

1.             Award of Stock.

 

1.1.          Award.  Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Company awards to Director                shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock (the “Shares”) pursuant to the Company’s 2010 Stock Incentive Plan in connection with Director’s service as a director.

 

1.2.          Investment Intent; Capacity to Protect Interests.  Director represents and warrants to the Company that the Shares are being acquired by Director solely for Director’s own account for investment and not with a view to or for sale in connection with any distribution of the Shares or any portion thereof and not with any present intention of selling, offering to sell, or otherwise disposing of or distributing the Shares or any portion thereof in any transaction other than a transaction registered under or exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

 

2.             Legends.  All certificates representing any of the Shares will contain the following legend, in additional to one or more legends referring to applicable contractual restrictions on transfer or repurchase rights of the Company:

 

“THE SECURITIES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE HAVE BEEN ISSUED WITHOUT REGISTRATION UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 (THE “ACT”) OR ANY STATE SECURITIES LAWS.  THEY MAY NOT BE SOLD, ASSIGNED, PLEDGED OR OTHERWISE TRANSFERRED FOR VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE REGISTERED UNDER THE ACT AND ANY APPLICABLE STATE SECURITIES LAWS OR THE CORPORATION RECEIVES AN OPINION OF COUNSEL SATISFACTORY TO IT, OR OTHERWISE SATISFIES ITSELF, THAT REGISTRATION IS NOT REQUIRED.”

 

3.             Governing Law.  This Agreement will be governed by, and will be construed and enforced in accordance with, the laws of the State of Oregon.

 

 

	
 
    	
ESCO   CORPORATION
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:   
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Name:
    
	
 
    	
Title:
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
DIRECTOR
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
(Signature)
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
(Print Name)
Unofficial English Translation


 


Exhibit 10.3


 


Class II New Drug Approval Assignment Agreement


 


Party A: Harbin Tianmu Pharmaceuticals Company Limited


 


Party B: Jilin Tonghua Yisheng Pharmaceuticals Company Limited


 



	
1.

	
Name of the Drug: Nafarelin







 



	
2.

	
Indications: Endometriosis; Prostatic Cancer







 



	
3.

	
Closing of the Assignment: Based on the national pharmaceutical approval standard, the assignment shall be consummated when the Phase 3 clinical trial is finished as evidenced by the New Drug Approval Certificate.







 



	
4.

	
Specification: the drug e shall meet all the requirements of Class II New Drug







 



	
5.

	
Total Payment: RMB 33,000,000







 



	
6.

	
Terms of Payment: 33% of the total amount (RMB 11,000,000) shall be payable upon execution of this Agreement.  33% of the total amount RMB(11,000,000) shall be payable upon consummation of Phase 3 clinical trial.  The balance shall be payable when all the proper procedures for the assignment have been finished.







 



	
7.

	
The Parties’ Rights and Obligations: Party A shall have all the rights in this product and shall make the payment in accordance with the terms of payment. Party B shall be responsible for research and development, clinical trials, preparation and correspondence with SFDA for the New Drug Approval Certificate, provide all the formula, process and technical support with regard to manufacture of the product, and make sure the product be in compliance with all the relevant quality, technical, sanitation and safety legal requirements.







 



	
8.

	
Other Agreements: The parties may discuss and reach agreement with respect to any matter that is not specified in this Agreement.







 



	
9.

	
Dispute Resolution: All disputes in connection with this agreement thereof shall be settled friendly through negotiations. In case no settlement can be reached, the case will be sent to the Party A’s district court.







 



	
10.

	
This Agreement is made in two counterparts, one for each party. Both of them have the same force and effect. This Agreement will be effective upon execution of the parties’ general managers.







 


(No text below)


 




  





  











  






 


Unofficial English Translation


 


Assignee: Harbin Tianmu Pharmaceuticals Company Limited


 


Legal Representative: [company seal]


 


Address: Beijing Road No. 1 Limin Development Zone, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province China


 


Assignor: Jilin Tonghua Yisheng Pharmaceuticals Company Limited


 


Legal Representative: [company seal]


 


Address: Tuanjie Road No. 8855 Kuaidamao Town, Tonghua County, Tonghua City, Jilin Province China.


 


Date: March 21, 2010
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 57 (Friday, March 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15623]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7267]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. 95-17; Notice 2]


Notice of Receipt of Petition for Decision That Nonconforming 
1985 Hobson Horse Trailers Are Eligible for Importation; Correction

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.

ACTION: Correction to notice of receipt of petition for decision that 
nonconforming 1985 Hobson horse trailers are eligible for importation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects a notice published Wednesday, March 15, 
1995 (60 FR 14053) announcing receipt by NHTSA of a petition for a 
decision that a 1985 Hobson horse trailer that was not originally 
manufactured to comply with all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety 
standards is eligible for importation into the United States. The 
notice incorrectly identified the vehicle as a ``Dobson'' horse 
trailer. The vehicle should have been properly identified as a 
``Hobson'' horse trailer.

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30141 (a)(1)(B) and (b)(1); 49 CFR 593.8; 
delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.50 and 501.8.

    Issued on March 20, 1995.
Harry Thompson,
Acting Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 95-7267 Filed 3-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3987

Enerpac:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Exhibit 99.1

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors

Killbuck Bancshares, Inc.

We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated
balance sheet of Killbuck Bancshares, Inc., and its consolidated subsidiary as of June 30, 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, and the consolidated
statement of changes in shareholders equity for the six-month period ended June 30, 2006 and the consolidated statement of cash flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005. These consolidated financial statements are
the responsibility of the Companys management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope
than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express
such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying financial statements for them
to be in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented
herein); and in our report dated February 9, 2006 we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/ S.R. SNODGRASS, A.C.
|S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.    
|Steubenville, Ohio      
|August 8, 2006
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5071

Scosche Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Amendment No. 8 to Employment Agreement - Keith Jackson



 Exhibit 10.2 

AMENDMENT NO. 8 TO 

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

FOR KEITH JACKSON 

WHEREAS, ON Semiconductor Corporation (“Company”) and Keith Jackson (“Executive”) entered into an Employment
Agreement dated as of November 10, 2002 and as previously amended (“Agreement”); 
 WHEREAS, all defined
terms used herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Agreement unless specifically defined herein; 
 WHEREAS, as
of February 23, 2010 the Compensation Committee (“Committee”) of the Board of Directors of ON Semiconductor Corporation considered and approved an increase, effective January 1, 2010, of the maximum target bonus percentage for
the Executive from 125% to 130% of his Base Salary during the applicable Performance Cycle under a bonus Program established and approved by the Committee and/or Board; and 

WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive now wish to amend the Agreement to reflect the increase to the maximum target bonus
percentage to 130% consistent with the Committee’s approvals and make certain related conforming changes to the Agreement. 

NOW, THEREFORE, for mutual consideration the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

 1. Effective January 1, 2010, Section 2(b) of the Agreement related to “Compensation” is hereby amended by replacing such
section in its entirety with the following: 
 “(b) In addition to the Base Salary, during the Employment
Period, the Executive shall be eligible to participate in the bonus program established and approved by the Board and/or its Compensation Committee (both or either herein may be referred to as the “Board”) (the “Program”) and,
pursuant to the Program, the Executive may earn a bonus (the “Bonus”) on an annual or other performance period basis (a “Performance Cycle”) up to a maximum target of 130% of Base Salary paid during the applicable Performance
Cycle or an additional amount as approved by the Board under the Program and in each case based on certain performance criteria; provided that the Executive is actively employed by the Company on the date the Bonuses are paid under the
Program, except as and if provided in Section 5(a) herein. The Bonus may be paid annually or more frequently depending upon the Performance Cycle, as determined by the Board and pursuant to the Program. The Bonus will be specified by the Board,
and the Bonus will be reviewed at least annually by the Board.” 
  

 1 








 2. Except as otherwise specifically provided in this Amendment, all terms and conditions of the Agreement
shall remain in full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive and the Company have executed this Amendment as of the 24 day
of March, 2010. 
  

									
	EXECUTIVE:	 		 	Keith Jackson, in his individual capacity
					
		 		 		 	By:	 	 /s/ KEITH JACKSON

		 		 		 	Name:	 	Keith Jackson
		 		 		 	Title:	 	Chief Executive Officer and President
			
	CORPORATION:	 		 	ON Semiconductor Corporation
					
		 		 		 	By:	 	 /s/ COLLEEN MCKEOWN

		 		 		 	Name:	 	Colleen McKeown
		 		 		 	Title:	 	Senior Vice President of Human Resources

  

 2
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 64 (Tuesday, April 4, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 17064]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8152]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Union-Calhoun Investments, Ltd.; Acquisition of Company Engaged 
in Permissible Nonbanking Activities

    The organization listed in this notice has applied under Sec.  
225.23(a)(2) or (f) of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.23(a)(2) or 
(f)) for the Board's approval under section 4(c)(8) of the Bank Holding 
Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843(c)(8)) and Sec.  225.21(a) of Regulation Y 
(12 CFR 225.21(a)) to acquire or control voting securities or assets of 
a company engaged in a nonbanking activity that is listed in Sec.  
225.25 of Regulation Y as closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, such activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    The application is available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. Once the application has been accepted 
for processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing on the question whether consummation of the proposal can 
``reasonably be expected to produce benefits to the public, such as 
greater convenience, increased competition, or gains in efficiency, 
that outweigh possible adverse effects, such as undue concentration of 
resources, decreased or unfair competition, conflicts of interests, or 
unsound banking practices.'' Any request for a hearing on this question 
must be accompanied by a statement of the reasons a written 
presentation would not suffice in lieu of a hearing, identifying 
specifically any questions of fact that are in dispute, summarizing the 
evidence that would be presented at a hearing, and indicating how the 
party commenting would be aggrieved by approval of the proposal.
    Comments regarding the application must be received at the Reserve 
Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than 
April 15, 1995.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (James A. Bluemle, Vice 
President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690:
    1. Union-Calhoun Investments, Ltd., Rockwell, City, Iowa; to 
acquire Keith Insurance, Rockwell City, Iowa, and thereby engage in 
insurance agency activities in a small town of less than 5,000 in 
population, pursuant to Sec.  225.25(b)(8)(iii) of the Board's 
Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 28, 
1995.
William W. Wiles,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-8152 Filed 4-3-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-20283

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

EDGAR MIGUEL FLORES-SOTO, also known as Edgar Miguel Flores, also 

known as Edgar Flores, also known as Edgar Flores Soto,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:13-CR-558

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Edgar Miguel Flores-Soto appeals his sentence following his guilty plea 

conviction for illegal reentry after deportation. He raises two arguments. He

first contends that his prior conviction for aggravated robbery under Texas 

Penal Code § 29.03(a)(2) does not constitute a crime of violence pursuant to

U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2 and that the district court therefore erred in assessing the 16-

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 31, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 14-20283 Document: 00512987892 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/31/2015
No. 14-20283

level enhancement of § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii). He also argues that his aggravated 

robbery offense fails to qualify as a crime of violence under the residual “force” 

clause, as the offense does not require the use, attempted use, or threatened 

use of force against another person. See § 2L1.2 cmt. n.1(B)(iii).

With respect to Flores-Soto’s first argument, he claims that his prior 

aggravated robbery offense does not qualify as the offense of robbery, as 

enumerated in § 2L1.2, because his Texas statute of conviction incorporates all 

Chapter 31 theft offenses under the Texas Penal Code, including theft by 

deception. He argues that theft by deception falls outside the generic definition 

of theft and that the Texas aggravated robbery statute therefore criminalizes 

conduct outside the generic meaning of robbery. However, a decision by this 

court, issued after Flores-Soto filed his initial brief, forecloses his argument. 

See United States v. Rodriguez-Salazar, 768 F.3d 437, 438 (5th Cir. 2014). 

Because theft by deception under Texas law does not deviate from the generic 

crime of theft, Flores-Soto’s argument is unavailing. Id.; see also United States 

v. Hernandez-Mejia, 588 F. App’x 376 (5th Cir. 2014). 

Accordingly, the district court did not err in assessing the 16-level 

enhancement of § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii). Because Flores-Soto’s prior offense 

qualifies as the enumerated offense of robbery under § 2L1.2’s definition of a 

crime of violence, we do not address his second argument that his prior 

conviction is not a crime of violence under the residual “force” clause of that 

definition.

AFFIRMED.

2

 Case: 14-20283 Document: 00512987892 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/31/2015
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 7 (Wednesday, January 11, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 2726]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-645]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 87-455; RM-5899, RM-6223, RM-6224, RM-6225, RM-6226, RM-
7111]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Perry, Cross City, Holiday, Avon 
Park, Sarasota, and Live Oak, FL, and Thomasville, GA

AGENCY: Federal Comminications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document grants a Motion for Severance filed by Women in 
Florida Broadcasting, Inc. concerning the action in this proceeding 
upgrading Station WDFL, Channel 292A, Cross City, Florida, to specify 
operation on Channel 295C1. See 54 FR 30549 (July 21, 1989).

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 11, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Hayne, Mass Media Bureau (202) 
634-6530.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Memorandum Opinion and Order in MM Docket 87-455, adopted December 27, 
1994, and released January 6, 1995. The full text of this Commission 
action is available for inspection and copying during normal business 
hours in the FCC Reference Center(Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW, 
Washington, D.C. The complete text of this action may also be purchased 
from the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription 
Service, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 2100 M Street, NW, Suite 140, 
Washington, D.C. 20037.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
Douglas W. Webbink,
Chief, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 95-645 Filed 1-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report ofBulldog Financial, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended May 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Scott McDowell, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 24th day of July, 2006.



| | SCOTT MCDOWELL                                     
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Scott McDowell                                     
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer















---