16566 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 1995 / Rules and Regulations

representation on the Area 2 Committee,

rather than the Area 3 Committee.

The Committees made their

recommendations to reestablish

boundaries after reviewing a request

from a producer/handler located near

Salida, Colorado, a relatively new potato

production area in Chaffee County.

Salida is approximately 250 miles from

the administrative headquarters of the

Area 3 Committee in Greeley, Colorado,

but only 65 miles from the

administrative headquarters of the Area

2 Committee in Monte Vista, Colorado.

There are approximately 115 acres of

potatoes grown in Chaffee County.

Arable land in Chaffee County is

generally limited to the area around

Salida. Industry estimates place the

potential for additional potato

production at about 500 acres.

The Chaffee County production area

is geographically separated from the rest

of Area 3 potato production and is much

closer to that of Area 2. Potatoes

produced in Chaffee County are

marketed similarly to those in Area 2.

Potatoes grown in Chaffee County are,

for example, often marketed through

handlers from Area 2, but seldom

marketed by Area 3 handlers located

outside of Chafee County.

The rule increases the opportunity for

the producers or handlers to serve on an

area committee by greatly decreasing

travel time and cost to attend area

Committee meetings. This rule also

enable any Chaffeee County producers

to be in the same committee area with

handlers who most often handle their

production.

The rule also modifies the

distribution of producer membership of

the Area 2 Committee to accommodate

the addition of Chaffee County to Area

2. Saguache County, immediately to the

south of Chaffee County, currently has

one producer representative on the Area

2 Committee. The rule combines Chaffee

and Saguache Counties as one district

for the purpose of nominating a

producer member to the Area 2

Committee. The change will continue to

provide balanced representation on the

Area 2 Committee, consistent with

acreage and production. Chaffee County

handlers also will be represented as the

Area 2 Committee has five handler

member positions, two representing

bulk handlers.

The close proximity of the Area 2

administrative office to Chaffee County

will improve the efficiency of marketing

order administration. Marketing order

compliance in Chaffee County will be

more efficiently administered by the

Area 2 Administrative Committee office

because of its proximity to Chaffee

County.

Although this final rule removes

Chaffee County from Area 3, regulatory

language in the newly created section

948.153 only references the addition of

Chaffee County to Area 2. Section 948.4

currently states that Area 3 includes and

consists of all the remaining counties in

the State of Colorado which are not

included in Area 1 or Area 2. Therefore,

the addition of Chaffee County to Area

2 automatically removes Chaffee County

from Area 3, with no other

corresponding change needed.

The proposed rule concerning this

action was published in the January 30,

1995, Federal Register (60 FR 5597),

with a 30-day comment period ending

March 1, 1995. No comments were

received.

Based on the above, the Administrator

of the AMS has determined that this

action will not have a significant

economic impact on a substantial

number of small entities.

After consideration of all relevant

matter presented, including the

information and recommendations

submitted by the committees and other

available information, it is hereby found

that this rule, as hereinafter set forth,

will tend to effectuate the declared

policy of the Act.

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is found

that good cause exists for not

postponing the effective date of this

action until 30 days after publication in

the Federal Register because: (1) the

Area 2 committee is planning to

conduct its annual nomination meeting

on March 31, 1995; and (2) producers

and handlers are aware of this action,

which was recommended at open

committee meetings, and need no

additional time to prepare for operation

under this rule.

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 948

Marketing agreements, Potatoes,

Reporting and recordkeeping

requirements.

For the reasons set forth in the

preamble, 7 CFR part 948 is amended as

follows:

PART 948—IRISH POTATOES GROWN

IN COLORADO

1. The authority citation for 7 CFR

part 948 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.

2. In § 948.150, paragraph (a) is

revised to read as follows:

§ 948.150 Reestablishment of committee

membership.

* * * * *

(a) Area No. 2 (San Luis Valley):

Seven producers and five handlers

selected as follows:

Two (2) producers from Rio Grande

County;

One (1) producer from Chaffee County and

Saguache County;

One (1) producer from Conejos County;

Two (2) producers from Alamosa County;

One (1) producer from all other counties in

Area No. 2;

Two (2) handlers representing bulk

handlers in Area No. 2;

Three (3) handlers representing handlers in

Area No. 2 other than bulk handlers.

* * * * *

3. A new § 948.153 is added to read

as follows:

§ 948.153 Reestablishment of area.

Pursuant to § 948.53, Area No. 2 is

reestablished as follows:

Area No. 2 (San Luis Valley) includes and

consists of the counties of Chaffee, Saguache,

Huerfano, Las Animas, Mineral, Archuleta,

Rio Grande, Conejos, Costilla, and Alamosa,

in the State of Colorado.

Dated: March 27, 1995.

Sharon Bomer Lauritsen,

Deputy Director, Fruit and Vegetable Division.

[FR Doc. 95–7961 Filed 3–30–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410–02–P

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 95–AWP–1]

Amendment of Class D Airspace;

Redding, CA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: This action amends the Class

D airspace area at Redding, CA. This

action is necessary due the recent

closures of Enterprise Skypark, CA and

Redding Sky Ranch Airport, CA. This

amendment will delete the Redding Sky

Ranch Airport and Enterprise Skypark

from the Class D airspace area at

Redding, CA.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC, July 20,

1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Scott Speer, Airspace Specialist, System

Management Branch, AWP–530, Air

Traffic Division, Western-Pacific

Region, Federal Aviation

Administration, 15000 Aviation

Boulevard, Lawndale, California, 90261,

telephone (310) 297–0010.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

On January 6, 1995, the FAA

proposed to amend part 71 of the
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 1995 / Rules and Regulations 16567

Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR

part 71) by amending the Class D

airspace area at Redding, CA (60 FR

3777). The proposed action was

necessary due to the closures of

Enterprise Skypark, and Redding Sky

Ranch Airport, CA. These locations will

be deleted from the Class D airspace

area at Redding, CA.

Interested parties were invited to

participate in this rulemaking

proceeding by submitting written

comments on the proposal to the FAA.

No comments on the proposal were

received. Class D airspace designations

are published in paragraph 5000 of FAA

Order 7400.9B, dated July 18, 1994, and

effective September 16, 1994, which is

incorporated by reference in 14 CFR

71.1. The Class D airspace designation

listed in this document will be

published subsequently in the Order.

The Rule

This amendment to part 71 of the

Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR

part 71) amends the Class D airspace

area at Redding, CA by deleting the

Redding Sky Ranch Airport and

Enterprise Skypark from the Class D

airspace area at Redding, CA.

The FAA has determined that this

regulation only involves an established

body of technical regulations for which

frequent and routine amendments are

necessary to keep them operationally

current. Therefore, this regulation—(1)

is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’

under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not

a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44

FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)

does not warrant preparation of a

Regulatory Evaluation as the anticipated

impact is so minimal. Since this is a

routine matter that will only affect air

traffic procedures and air navigation, it

is certified that this rule will not have

a significant economic impact on a

substantial number of small entities

under the criteria of the Regulatory

Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

Aviation safety, Incorporation by

reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

In consideration of the foregoing, the

Federal Aviation Administration

amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71—[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for part 71

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. app. 1348(a), 1354(a),

1510; E. O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–

1963 Comp., p. 389; 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 14 CFR

11.69.

§ 71.1 [Amended]

2. The incorporation by reference in

14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation

Administration Order 7400.9B, Airspace

Designations and Reporting Points,

dated July 18, 1994, and effective

September 16, 1994, is amended as

follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class D Airspace

* * * * *

AWP CA D Redding, CA [Revised]

Redding Municipal Airport, CA

(lat. 40°30′32′′ N, Long. 122°17′36′′ W)

That airspace extending upward from the

surface to and including 3000 feet MSL

within a 4.3-mile radius of the Redding

Municipal Airport. This Class D airspace area

is effective during the specific dates and

times established in advance by a Notice to

Airmen. The effective date and time will

thereafter be continuously published in the

Airport/Facility Directory.

* * * * *

Issued in Los Angeles, California, on

March 15, 1995.

Richard R. Lien,

Manager, Air Traffic Division, Western-Pacific

Region.

[FR Doc. 95–7983 Filed 3–30–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

18 CFR Part 385

[Docket No. RM92–12–000]

Streamlining of Regulations Pertaining

to Parts II and III of the Federal Power

Act and the Public Utility Regulatory

Policies Act of 1978; Correction to

Order No. 575

March 24, 1995.

AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

SUMMARY: On January 13, 1995 (60 FR

4831, January 25, 1995), the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission issued a

final rule amending its regulations to

streamline the processing the

Commission’s workload and to reduce

regulatory burdens on the electric utility

and qualifying facility industries. This

document corrects an error in an

amendment to the Commission’s Rules

of Practice and Procedure which was

intended to remove the phrase ‘‘or

revised initial’’ in Rule 713.

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 24, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Lois D. Cashell, Secretary of the

Commission (202) 208–0400.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Accordingly, the final rule published

January 25, 1995, in the Federal

Register at 60 FR 4831 (FR Doc. 95–

1449), is corrected as follows:

§ 385.713 [Corrected]

On page 4860, in the third column,

the amendatory instruction for § 385.713

should be corrected to read as follows:

32. In § 385.713, in paragraph (a)(2)(i),

the phrase ‘‘or, if appropriate under

Rules 717 and 711, to a revised initial

decision’’ is removed; in paragraph

(a)(2)(iv), the phrase ‘‘or revised initial’’

is removed; and in paragraph (a)(3), the

phrase ‘‘or any revised initial decision

under Rule 717’’ is removed.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–7899 Filed 3–30–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 5

Delegations of Authority and

Organization

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration,

HHS.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug

Administration (FDA) is amending the

regulations to set forth the current

organizational structure of the agency as

well as the current addresses for

headquarters and field offices. This

action is necessary to ensure the

accuracy of the regulations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 31, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Edna Morgan, Division of Management

Systems and Policy (HFA–340), Food

and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers

Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301–443–

4976.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

regulations are being amended in 21

CFR 5.100 and 5.115 to reflect the

current organizational structure of the

agency and to provide current addresses

for headquarters and for field and

district offices.

Notice and comment on these

revisions is not necessary under the

Administrative Procedure Act because

this is a rule of agency organization (5

U.S.C. 553(b)).