alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 63 (Monday, April 3, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16857-16858]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8059]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 032395B]


Endangered Species; Permits

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Issuance of Amendment 1 to Permit 895 (P504D).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Notice is hereby given that on March 28, 1995, as authorized by the 
provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA) (16 U.S.C. 1531-
1543) and the NMFS regulations governing listed fish and wildlife 
permits (50 CFR parts 217-222), NMFS issued Amendment 1 to Permit 
Number 895 held by the Army Corps of Engineers (P504D), to transport 
listed Snake River [[Page 16858]] chinook and sockeye salmon below the 
Bonneville Dam, subject to certain conditions set forth therein.
    This Amendment is being issued to conform to guidelines in the 
Reinitiation of Consultation on 1994-1998 Operation of the Federal 
Columbia River Power System and Juvenile Transportation Program in 1995 
and Future Years (FCRPS). All transportation activities conducted under 
this permit must comply with the guidelines of the FCRPS.
    Issuance of this Amendment, as required by the ESA, was based on a 
finding that such permit: (1) Was applied for in good faith; (2) will 
not operate to the disadvantage of the listed species which are the 
subject of the permit; (3) is consistent with the purposes and policies 
set forth in section 2 of the ESA. This Amendment was also issued in 
accordance with and is subject to parts 217-222 of Title 50 CFR, the 
NMFS regulations governing listed species permits.
    The application, permit, and supporting documentation are available 
for review by interested persons in the following offices, by 
appointment:
    Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, 1335 East-West Highway, Silver 
Spring, MD 20910-3226 (301-713-1401); and
    Environmental and Technical Services Division, NMFS, NOAA, 911 
North East 11th Ave., Room 620, Portland, OR 97232 (503-230-5400).

    Dated: March 28, 1995.
Robert C. Ziobro,
Acting Chief, Endangered Species Division, Office of Protected 
Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 95-8059 Filed 3-31-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-6160

NDK America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
#### Edward Bernard RANDLE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 01-93-00859-CR.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.).

June 8, 1994.

*319M. Catherine Clarkson, Houston, for appellant.

John B. Holmes, Jr., Linda A. West, Craig Goodhart, Harris, for appellee.

Before HUTSON-DUNN, COHEN and O’CONNOR, JJ.

ORDER

HUTSON-DUNN, Justice.

The Court today considered appellant’s motion for leave to file an additional point of error concerning ineffective assistance of counsel. We deny the motion.

All points of error that an appellant wishes to rely upon and all responses thereto are to be submitted in the original briefs. *Rochelle v. State,*791 S.W.2d 121, 124 (Tex. Crim.App.1990). Any new matters a party wants to bring before the court may be filed in a supplemental or amended brief but only “as justice requires and upon such reasonable terms as the court may prescribe.” *Id.;*Tex.R.App.P. 74(o).

This motion was filed seven weeks after appellant’s brief was filed, three weeks after the State’s brief was filed, and a month before submission. The original brief already has a point of error asserting ineffective assistance of counsel. The additional brief alleges additional ways in which trial counsel was ineffective. If it is filed, the State will have to file another brief in order to be heard in answer to appellant’s new contentions. No reason is stated why this new complaint was not included in the original brief. We do not see a “compelling matter” that rises to the level which would justify granting leave to file an additional point of error. *Rochelle,*791 S.W.2d at 124.

O’CONNOR, Justice,

dissenting.

I dissent from the majority’s order denying leave to file a supplemental brief with an additional point of error. I would grant leave.

Edward Bernard Randle, the appellant, filed his brief on March 24, 1994; the State filed a reply brief on April 22. On May 16, 1994, the appellant filed a motion for leave to file an additional point of error relating to ineffective assistance of counsel. With the motion for leave to file, the appellant filed a supplemental brief with the additional point of error. The new point alleges the appellant’s trial attorney was ineffective because he did not issue subpoenas for two witnesses, one of them an alibi witness. The ease is scheduled for oral argument on June 13.

Tex.R.App.P. 74(o) states:

> Briefs may be amended or supplemented at any time when justice requires upon such reasonable terms as the court may prescribe, and if the court shall strike or refuse to consider any part of a brief, the court shall on reasonable terms allow the same to be amended or supplemented.

At this time, one month before oral argument, justice requires us to allow appellant to file an additional point of error. *See Boyle v. State,*820 S.W.2d 122, 141 (Tex.Crim.App.1991) (State permitted to raise additional issue on motion for rehearing). Because we have already received the appellant’s supplemental brief, this Court could give the State reasonable time to answer before oral argument.

I would grant leave to file an additional. point of error.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
Planet Polymer Technologies, Inc. on Form S-8 (No. 333-1042) of our report,
which contains an explanatory paragraph relating to the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern, dated March 18, 2004 on the financial statements
of Planet Polymer Technologies, Inc. as of December 31, 2003 and for the years
ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, which report is included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB.

                                       /s/ J. H. COHN LLP


San Diego, California
March 29, 2004
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5200 

To require a report from the Director of the Secret Service on illicit use 

of controlled substances at the Executive Residence. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 11, 2023 

Mr. STEUBE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To require a report from the Director of the Secret Service 

on illicit use of controlled substances at the Executive 

Residence. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Helping Understand 

5 Narcotics Traces at the Executive Residence Act of 2023’’ 

6 or as the ‘‘HUNTER Act of 2023’’. 

7 SEC. 2. REPORT ON ILLICIT USE OF CONTROLLED SUB8 STANCES IN THE WHITE HOUSE. 

9 Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment 

10 of this Act, the Director of the Secret Service shall submit 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5200 IH

1 a report to Congress on the illicit use of controlled sub2 stances present at the White House, which shall include— 

3 (1) steps taken to avoid controlled substances 

4 from coming into the White House; 

5 (2) vulnerabilities where drugs can make its 

6 way into the White House; 

7 (3) a full account of the investigation into the 

8 cocaine found at the White House in 2023; and 

9 (4) recommendations on how Congress can pro10 vide oversight or resources to prevent illicit usage of 

11 controlled substances in the Executive Branch. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5049

Radio Systems Corp:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_5-30-2019.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
<PAGE>

                            INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



The Board of Directors
Pillowtex Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
(nos. 33-65408, 33-84624, 33-81478, 333-39191 and 333-57727) on Form S-8 of
Pillowtex Corporation of our report dated February 9, 1999, 
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Pillowtex Corporation and
subsidiaries as of January 3, 1998 and January 2, 1999, and the related
consolidated statements of earnings, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for 
each of the years in the three-year period ended January 2, 1999, and related
schedule, which report is included in the January 2, 1999 annual report on
Form 10-K of Pillowtex Corporation.







                                                  KPMG LLP




Dallas, Texas
March 29, 1999
```

                                                                                                                 Exhibit 32.1

                                                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                  SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
                                                   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                                        SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant  to  Section  1350,  Chapter  63 of Title 18,  United  States  Code,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, the  undersigned,  as Chief Executive  Officer of U.S. Can  Corporation  (the  "Company"),  does
hereby certify that to the undersigned's knowledge:

1)       the  Company's  Annual  Report on Form  10-K/A for the period  ending  December  31,  2003 fully  complies  with the
         requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)       the  information  contained in the Company's  Annual  Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ending  December 31, 2003
         fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                                                /s/ George V. Bayly

                                                                George V. Bayly
                                                                Co-Chairman of the Board and
                                                                Chief Executive Officer

                                                                Dated: November 17, 2004
```
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

April 12, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4392

ECM Industries LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_04.15.19.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 65 (Wednesday, April 5, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 17375]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8309]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50-245]


Northeast Nuclear Energy Company; Notice of Withdrawal of 
Application for Amendment to Facility Operating License

    The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has granted 
the request of Northeast Nuclear Energy Company (the licensee) to 
withdraw its June 23, 1994, application for proposed amendment to 
Facility Operating License No. DPR-21 for Millstone Nuclear Power 
Station, Unit 1, located in New London County, Connecticut.
    The proposed amendment would have reworded Technical Specification 
3.7, ``Containment Systems,'' to permit operation with one of the two 
circuits of the reactor building ventilation logic temporarily 
inoperable. In addition, Section 3.7.C.1.b would have been reworded to 
prohibit movement of irradiated fuel, or movement of any loads over 
irradiated fuel, without secondary containment integrity.
    The Commission had previously issued a Notice of Consideration of 
Issuance of Amendment published in the Federal Register on August 31, 
1994 (59 FR 45029). However, by letter dated March 15, 1995, the 
licensee withdrew the proposed change.
    For further details with respect to this action, see the 
application for amendment dated June 23, 1994, and the licensee's 
letter dated March 15, 1995, which withdrew the application for license 
amendment. The above documents are available for public inspection at 
the Commission's Public Document Room, the Gelman Building, 2120 L 
Street, NW., Washington, DC, and at the local public document room 
located at the Learning Resource Center, Three Rivers Community-
Technical College, Thames Valley Campus, 574 New London Turnpike, 
Norwich, CT 06360.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 27th day of March 1995.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
James W. Andersen,
Project Manager, Project Directorate I-4 Division of Reactor Projects--
I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 95-8309 Filed 4-4-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                      5
<LEGEND>
The  schedule  contains  a  summary  of  financial  information  extracted  from
Delicious  Brands,  Inc.  financial  statements  as of September 30, 1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                                   JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                    SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                                                    0
<SECURITIES>                                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                     6,967,897
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        823,877
<INVENTORY>                                                       1,369,575
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                  7,991,430
<PP&E>                                                              999,245
<DEPRECIATION>                                                      699,963
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                   19,057,326
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            18,543,982
<BONDS>                                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                   350
<PREFERRED>                                                       1,516,668
<COMMON>                                                             47,150
<OTHER-SE>                                                       (1,629,945)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                     19,057,326
<SALES>                                                          32,873,672
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                 32,873,672
<CGS>                                                            25,252,463
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    25,252,463
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 11,793,051
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    334,547
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                  484,234
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 (4,873,320)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             (4,873,320)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    (4,873,320)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                        (1.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                        (1.06)


</TABLE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-3038

Curtis Instruments, Puerto Rico, Inc: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel