alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5852

Scosche Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Exhibit 21
         SUBSIDIARIES OF SOUTHERN ENERGY HOMES, INC.

DIRECT SUBSIDIARIES:

1.  Al/Tex Homes, Inc., d/b/a Southern Energy Homes of Texas.

2.  Southern Energy Homes of North Carolina, Inc., d/b/a Imperial Homes.

3.  WENCO Finance, Inc.

4.  MH Transport, Inc.

5.  Southern Energy Homes of Pennsylvania, Inc., d/b/a Energy Homes

6.  BR Holding Corp.

INDIRECT SUBSIDIARIES:

1.  BR Agency, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of BR Holding Corp.
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 29 (Friday, February 12, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 7624]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02872]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[C3 Capital Partners III, L.P.; License No. 07/07-0118]


Notice Seeking Exemption Under Section 312 of the Small Business 
Investment Act, Conflicts of Interest

    Notice is hereby given that C3 Capital Partners III, L.P., 1511 
Baltimore Avenue, Suite 500, Kansas City, MO 64108, a Federal Licensee 
under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (``the 
Act''), in connection with the financing of a small concern, has sought 
an exemption under Section 312 of the Act and Section 107.730, 
Financings which constitute Conflicts of Interest of the Small Business 
Administration (``SBA'') Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107). Midwest 
Mezzanine Fund V SBIC, L.P., proposes providing subordinated debt and 
private equity financing to Drive Source International, 7900 Durand 
Avenue, Sturtevant, WI 53177. The financing by C3 Capital Partners III, 
L.P. will discharge obligations held by C3 Capital Partners II, L.P., 
LLC.
    This financing is brought within the purview of Sec.  107.730 of 
the Regulations because C3 Capital Partners III, L.P. and C3 Capital 
Partners II, L.P. are Associates and C3 Capital Partners II, L.P., 
holds over five percent of the equity in DSI, therefore this 
transaction requires prior SBA exemption.
    Notice is hereby given that any interested person may submit 
written comments on the transaction, within fifteen days of the date of 
this publication, to the Associate Administrator for Investment and 
Innovation, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20416.

Mark Walsh,
Associate Administrator for Office of Investment and Innovation.
[FR Doc. 2016-02872 Filed 2-11-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P
EXHIBIT 21.1
                  SUBSIDIARIES OF PRIME MEDICAL SERVICES, INC.
                              AS OF MARCH 20, 1998

    EXHIBIT 21.1
    Name of Subsidiary                           State of Incorporation
    -------------------                          --------------------
    Prime Medical Operating, Inc.                Delaware

    Prime Management, Inc.                       Nevada

    Prime Cardiac Rehabilitation Services, Inc.  Delaware

    Prime Diagnostic Services, Inc.              Delaware

    Prime Lithotripsy Services, Inc.             New York

    Prime Kidney Stone Treatment, Inc.           New Jersey

    Prime Diagnostic Corp. of Florida            Delaware

    Prime Lithotripter Operations, Inc.          New York

    Prime Practice Management, Inc.              New York

    Texas Litho, Inc.                            Delaware

    R.R. Litho, Inc.                             Delaware

    Ohio Litho, Inc.                             Delaware

    Alabama Renal Stone Institute, Inc.          Alabama

    Sun Medical Technologies, Inc.               California

    Sun Acquisition, Inc.                        California

    Lithotripters, Inc.                          North Carolina

    FastStart, Inc.                              North Carolina

    National Lithotripters Association, Inc.     North Carolina

    Prostatherapies, Inc                         Delaware

    MedTech Investments, Inc.                    North Carolina

    Executive Medical Enterprises, Inc.          Delaware
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DANNY JAMES COHEA,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

C. E. DUCART; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees,

and

EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., Former

Governor; et al.,

Defendants. No. 19

- 16783

D.C. No. 3:17

- cv

- 05399

- CRB

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Charles R. Breyer, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 7

, 2020 * *

Before: TASHIMA, BYBEE, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Danny James Cohea appeals pro se from the district

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

APR 17 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 19

- 16783

court’s order denying his motion for a preliminary injunction in his 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 action alleging constitutional claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 129 2(a)(1)

. We review for an abuse of discretion. Jackson v. City & County of

San Francisco , 746 F.3d 953, 958 (9th Cir. 2014). We affirm.

The district court did not abu se its discretion by denying Cohea ’s motion for

a preliminary injunction because Cohea failed to demonstrate that such relief is

warranted. See id. ( plaintiff seeking preliminary injunction must establish that he

is likely to succeed on the merits, likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of

preliminary relief, the balance of equities tips in his favor, and an injunction is in

the public i nterest).

To the extent that Cohea challenges any other orders, we l ack jurisdiction to

consider them in this appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1) ( c ourt of a ppeals has

jurisdiction to review an interlocutory denial of injunctive relief); see also 28

U.S.C. § 1291 (generally, c ourt of a ppeals only has jurisdiction over appe als from

final decisions of the district court); Chacon v. Babcock , 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th

Cir. 1981) (absent certification under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b), an order is not

appealable unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or judgment is entered).

Cohea’s motion to take judicial notice (Docket Entry No. 22) is denied.

AFFIRMED.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MICHAEL DEMEO,

Appellant,

v.

ROBERT GOLD,

Appellee.

No. 4D16-3900

[October 5, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Timothy L. Bailey, Judge; L.T. Case No. DVCE 

16002008.

Bryan Raymond, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No brief filed on behalf of appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

TAYLOR, MAY and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
KROY IP HOLDINGS, LL C, Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

SAFEWAY, INC.
, Defendant

- Appellee

______________________

2015

- 1782

______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in No. 2:12

- cv

- 00800

- WCB, Circuit Judge William C. Bryson.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

T IMOTHY P. M ALONEY , Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery, Chicago, IL, argued for plaintiff

- appellant. Also repr esented by J OSEPH F. M ARINELLI , A LISON A UBRY R ICHARDS , N ICOLE L. L ITTLE ; S TEVEN C. S CHROER , Boulder, CO.

J AMES C HRISTOPHER M A RTIN , Reed Smith LLP, Pitt sburgh, PA, argued for defendant

- appellee. Also represen ted by K IRSTEN R YDSTROM ; G ERARD M. D ONOVAN , Washington, DC; C HRISTINE M. M ORGAN , W ILLIAM R OSS O VEREND , San Francisco, CA.______________________

T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (N EWMAN , S CHALL , and C HEN , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

April 21, 2016 /s/ Daniel E O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5142

Enerpac:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, David DeMarco, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Blacksands Petroleum, Inc., for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Blacksands Petroleum, Inc.





Date: June 21, 2010
By  :/s/ David DeMarcoDavid DeMarco
Principal Executive Officer
Organization Name:

Note: Representatives submitting on behalf of an organization must enter information below.

Requestor Representative:

Section 301 Investigation: China's Acts, Policies, and Practices Related to Technology 

Transfer, Intellectual Property, and Innovation - Form to Request Exclusion of Product

When submitting a product exclusion request using this form, enter the specified 

information in the following fields and explain the basis and rationale for your statements. 

By completing this form, you certify that the information provided is complete and 

correct to the best of your knowledge. 

1. Indicate whether the comment contains business confidential information (BCI), is a public

document, or is a public version of a BCI document.

3.

2. Please provide a complete and detailed description of the product of concern:

4.

5. Requestor's relationship to the product:

CONTINUED BELOW

*

10-digit HTSUS item number* for product you wish to address in this product exclusion request:

Use numerical characters only with no special characters (example: 1023456789). For help in finding 

the HTSUS item number associated with your product, see https://hts.usitc.gov/

1

7.

6. Does this submission in regulations.gov include additional attachments?

Please indicate whether any additional attachment contains business confidential

information (BCI), is a public document, or is a public version of a BCI document.

VERSION 1

Requestor Information

Requestor Name (Last, First):

Public Version of BCI

SCREW END FOR MINING JACK

8479909496 Schmidt, Jackie Enerpac Jackie SchmidtImporter Yes Contains BCI
END 2

8. Is this product, or a comparable product, available from sources in the United States?:

VERSION 1

11. Please provide information in support your request, taking account of the instructions

provided in Section B of the Federal Register notice (note: text entered below can extend

beyond the apparent size of this box).

9. Is this product, or a comparable product, available from sources in third countries?:

10. Please provide the value and quantity (with units) of the Chinese-origin product of concern

that you purchased for each calendar year specified. Limit this figure to the products

purchased by your firm (or by members of your trade association) alone. Please provide 

estimates if precise figures are unavailable.

2016 Value:

2015 Value:

2017 Value:

2016 Quantity:

2015 Quantity:

2017 Quantity:

No No BCI BCI BCI BCI BCI BCI

See addendum for additional information.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7403
SALVADOR MICHAEL MARTINEZ, Petitioner - Appellant, versus JOSEPH M. BROOKS, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-03-1021-1) Submitted: December 16, 2004 Decided: December 23, 2004 Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Salvador Michael Martinez, Appellant Pro Se. Dennis Carl Barghaan, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Salvador Michael Martinez, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Martinez v. Brooks , No. CA-03-1021-1 (E.D. Va. filed July 26, 2004 & entered July 27, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Douglas Thwaites, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lombardo, J.), rendered April 15, 1986, convicting him of murder in the second degree and assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the criminal proceedings in their entirety, we are of the opinion that the defendant received meaningful and effective representation by counsel *(see, People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137). Under the circumstances of this case, the defense counsel’s failure to request an instruction on the mitigating defense of extreme emotional disturbance can reasonably be viewed as a strategic decision and ”[i]t is not for this court to second-guess whether a course chosen by defendant’s counsel was the best trial strategy, or even a good one, so long as the defendant was afforded meaningful representation” *(People v Speight,*158 AD2d 729).

The defendant’s contention that the verdict sheet submitted to the jury was improper is not preserved for appellate review since he failed to object to its submission *(see, People v Mathis,*150 AD2d 613; *People v Decambre,*143 AD2d 927; *People v*
      *744
      *Battles,*141 AD2d 748), and we decline to review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction in view of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt *(see, People v Mathis, supra; People v Lugo,*150 AD2d 502).

Finally, we perceive no basis on which to modify the sentence *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). Mangano, P. J., Kunzeman, Rubin and Balletta, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 59 (Tuesday, March 28, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15932]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7530]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

Ocean Freight Forwarded License Applicants

    Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have filed 
with the Federal Maritime Commission applications for licenses as ocean 
freight forwarders pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 
(46 U.S.C. app. 1718 and 46 CFR 510).
    Persons knowing of any reason why any of the following applicants 
should not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of 
Freight Forwarders, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573.

Southern World International, Inc., 815 NW., 57th Ave., Suite 307, 
Miami, FL 33126, Officers: Herbert T. Whitley, III, President, David 
H. Paulsen, Secretary
Penbroke Marine Services, Inc., 803 Castleton Ave., Staten Island, 
NY 10310, Officers: Wayne R. Lindeman, President, Renate K. 
Lindeman, Director/Secretary
B.W.S. Trade Coordinators, Inc., 115 Essex Road, Summit, NJ 07901, 
Officers; James O. Bohnstedt, President, Angelo A. Borras, Vice 
President
Sureway Air Traffic Corporation, d/b/a Sureway International 
Logistics, 48-40 34th Street, Long Island City, NY 11101, Officers: 
Thomas Lopresti, President, Joe Caruvana, Vice President

    Dated: March 22, 1995.

    By the Federal Maritime Commission.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-7530 Filed 3-27-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
exhibit10_1.htm


                                      

                                           


 


Exhibit 10.1


 


 


2010 Brunswick Performance Plan (BPP)


Summary Terms and Conditions













	
Purpose

	
Reward achievement of annual goals


 


	
Eligibility

	
Key managers and above identified on an individual basis.


 


	
Performance Period

	
Fiscal year.


 


	
Performance Measures

	
Funding based 100% on level of corporate-wide free cash flow as of the end of the performance period.


 


Free Cash Flow (“FCF”) ties to GAAP cash flow schedule (excluding financing activities) adjusted for:


 


·  Acquisition/sale of “strategic” assets;


·  Variance from $22 million legal minimum defined benefit pension funding due in 2010, which is contained in the budget;


·  Impact on FCF of any change in financing; 


·  Change in growth capital outside of +/- $5 million versus budget; and


·  Impact of cash restructuring activities versus budget.


 


Payments will be capped at 200%


 


	
Funding  Review and Approval

	
The following steps will be taken to review and approve funding:


 


§  CFO will review actual results quarterly to evaluate established accruals.


§  CEO will review performance at end of performance period and recommend funding to Human Resources and Compensation Committee as appropriate.


§  Human Resources and Compensation Committee will review and approve funding as deemed appropriate.


 


	
Individual Awards

	
Individual awards will be determined on a discretionary basis using overall approved funding, evaluation of individual performance for the performance period, target incentives as a percent of salary and covered salary (actual paid for year).


 


Individuals must be employed at the end of the performance period to receive an award, except those terminating due to death or permanent and total disability will be eligible to receive individual awards.


 


	
Timing and Form of Award Payments


 

	
In 2011 after financial results are confirmed and appropriate approvals are obtained.  Payment may be made in cash, shares of Brunswick common stock, or in a combination of cash or stock, as determined by the Committee.
#### Bill HERRON, Appellant, v. Dean M. SHERRILL, Respondent.

No. WD 40254.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Sept. 27, 1988.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Nov. 1, 1988.

Bill Herron, Jefferson City, pro se.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Byrona J. Kincannon, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before COVINGTON, P.J., and NUGENT and GAITAN, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Herron appeals the judgment of trial court pursuant to his claim of breach of duty by respondent to investigate appellant prior to his parole hearing.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
************EXHIBIT 21.1**

**SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT**

MegaBingo, Inc., a Delaware corporation 

MGAM Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation 

MGAM Services, LLC, a Delawarelimited liability company 

Innovative Sweepstakes Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation 

MGAM Systems International, Inc., a Delaware corporation 

Megabingo International, LLC, a Delaware limited liabilitycompany 

Multimedia Games de Mexico S. de R.L. de C.V., a Mexican entity 

Servicios de Wild Basin S. de R.L. de C.V., a Mexican entity