alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C 1350)
    Cole Credit Property Trust II, Inc.By:
    /s/ Christopher H. ColeName:
    Christopher H. ColeTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer
and President 
(Principal
Executive Officer)By:
    /s/ D. Kirk McAllaster, Jr.Name:
    D. Kirk McAllaster, Jr.Date: November 12, 2009
    
    Title:
    Executive Vice President
and 
Chief Financial
Officer 
(Principal
Financial Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 510 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 510

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 10, 2024

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To require the United States Governor of, and the United States 
  Executive Director at, the International Monetary Fund to oppose an 
 increase in the weight of the Chinese renminbi in the Special Drawing 
           Rights basket of the Fund, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Chinese Currency Accountability Act 
of 2023''.

SEC. 2. OPPOSITION OF THE UNITED STATES TO AN INCREASE IN THE WEIGHT OF 
              THE CHINESE RENMINBI IN THE SPECIAL DRAWING RIGHTS BASKET 
              OF THE INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND.

    The Secretary of the Treasury shall instruct the United States 
Governor of, and the United States Executive Director at, the 
International Monetary Fund to use the voice and vote of the United 
States to oppose any increase in the weight of the Chinese renminbi in 
the basket of currencies used to determine the value of Special Drawing 
Rights, unless the Secretary of the Treasury has submitted to the 
Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate a 
written report which includes a certification that--
            (1) the People's Republic of China is in compliance with 
        all its obligations under Article VIII of the Articles of 
        Agreement of the Fund;
            (2) in the preceding 12 months, there has not been a report 
        submitted under section 3005 of the Omnibus Trade and 
        Competitiveness Act of 1988 or section 701 of the Trade 
        Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act of 2015 in which the 
        People's Republic of China has been found to have manipulated 
        its currency; and
            (3) the People's Republic of China adheres to the rules and 
        principles of the Paris Club and the OECD Arrangement on 
        Officially Supported Export Credits.

SEC. 3. SUNSET.

    Section 2 shall have no force or effect beginning 10 years after 
the date of the enactment of this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 9, 2024.

            Attest:

                                             KEVIN F. MCCUMBER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5195 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5195

           To repeal the District of Columbia Home Rule Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 11, 2023

Mr. Ogles (for himself, Mr. Donalds, and Mr. Rosendale) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
Accountability, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period 
    to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To repeal the District of Columbia Home Rule Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Seat of Government Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HOME RULE ACT.

    The District of Columbia Home Rule Act (sec. 1-201.01 et seq., D.C. 
Official Code) is hereby repealed.
                                 <all>
```
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4305

SPM Flow Control, Inc. DBA Weir SPM:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-20-00398-CR

John Wachtendorf, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 427TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 

NO. D-1-DC-18-204086, THE HONORABLE TAMARA NEEDLES, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

Appellant John Wachtendorf seeks to appeal a judgment of conviction for the 

third-degree felony offense of driving while intoxicated (DWI) with two prior DWI convictions. 

See Tex. Penal Code §§ 49.04, .09(b). The trial court has certified that Wachtendorf has waived 

the right of appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d).

__________________________________________

Jeff Rose, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Baker and Kelly

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: September 10, 2020

Do Not Publish
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**DANIEL KING,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**RIVERWATCH CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOCIATION,** 

**Respondent :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 489 MAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from**

**the Order of the Commonwealth Court**

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 29th day of December, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of** 

**Appeal is** DENIED

**.**

**Mr. Justice Eakin did not participate in the decision of t his matter.**
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of : No. 64 DB 2022 (No. 28 RST 2022)

:

MICHAEL A. POREDA : Attorney Registration No. 323382

:

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT :

 FROM ADMINISTRATIVE SUSPENSION : (Out of State)

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 23rd day of June, 2022, the Report and Recommendation of 

Disciplinary Board Member dated June 15, 2022, is approved and it is ORDERED that

MICHAEL A. POREDA, who has been on Administrative Suspension, has never been 

suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications, 

competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, 

shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this 

Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing 

of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5084 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5084

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1106 Main Street in Bastrop, Texas, as the ``Sergeant Major Billy D. 
                          Waugh Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 28, 2023

 Mr. McCaul (for himself, Mr. Ellzey, Mr. Crenshaw, Mr. Sessions, Mr. 
Babin, Mr. Arrington, Mr. Jackson of Texas, Mr. Williams of Texas, Ms. 
   Crockett, Mr. Fallon, Ms. Granger, Ms. Van Duyne, Mr. Veasey, Mr. 
Allred, Mr. Tony Gonzales of Texas, Mr. Self, Mr. Nehls, Mr. Gooden of 
  Texas, Mr. Moran, and Mr. Carter of Texas) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                             Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1106 Main Street in Bastrop, Texas, as the ``Sergeant Major Billy D. 
                          Waugh Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SERGEANT MAJOR BILLY D. WAUGH POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1106 Main Street in Bastrop, Texas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Sergeant Major Billy D. Waugh Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sergeant 
Major Billy D. Waugh Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Demetrius HOOKER, Appellant. Demetrius HOOKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. 64040, 65616.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

March 14, 1995.

Raymund J. Capelovitch, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant Hooker.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Mary Moulton Bryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before SMITH, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and WHITE, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the judgment entered on his convictions by a jury of second degree murder, first degree assault, two counts of attempted first degree robbery and four counts of anned criminal action. Defendant was sentenced to concurrent terms of life imprisonment for the murder conviction, twenty-five years imprisonment for the assault and armed criminal action convictions, and fifteen years for the attempted robbery convictions. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Defendant also appeals the denial, without an evidentiary ■ hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion. Defendant failed to raise a point of error regarding his Rule 29.15 motion. Defendant’s appeal of this issue is, therefore, deemed abandoned and the motion court’s *261judgment is affirmed. *State v. Simmons,*861 S.W.2d 128, 130 (Mo.App.E.D.1993).
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 99(C)


January 21, 1999


MANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL RELATED TO SERVICING PROCEDURES

The management of Greenwood Trust Company (the "Company") is responsible for
establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial
reporting of the Company in effect at November 30, 1998, insofar as it relates
to the servicing procedures provided by the Company under the relevant sections
of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for Discover Card Trust 1993 B, dated as
of February 1, 1993, between the Company and Wilmington Trust Company, as
amended.  The internal control contains monitoring mechanisms, and actions are
taken to correct deficiencies identified.

There are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any internal control,
including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of
controls.  Accordingly, even effective internal control can provide only
reasonable assurance with respect to financial reporting.  Further, because of
changes in conditions, the effectiveness of internal control may vary over
time.

Management has assessed the Company's internal control over financial reporting
insofar as it relates to the servicing procedures provided by the Company under
the relevant sections of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement as of November 30,
1998.  This assessment was based on criteria for effective internal control
over financial reporting described in "Internal Control-Integrated Framework"
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Based on management's assessment, the Company maintained effective internal
control over financial reporting insofar as it relates to the servicing
procedures provided by the Company under the relevant sections of the Pooling
and Servicing Agreement as of November 30, 1998.


Signed,


/s/ J. Nathan Hill
----------------------------------------------------
J. Nathan Hill
President


/s/ John J. Coane
----------------------------------------------------
John J. Coane
Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer & Treasurer
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4706

Scosche Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 492 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 492

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of 
  Veterans Affairs to establish a patient outreach system relating to 
              mental health care, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 24, 2023

 Mr. Wittman (for himself and Mr. Case) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of 
  Veterans Affairs to establish a patient outreach system relating to 
              mental health care, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Be Ready to Assist Veterans in 
Extremis Act'' or the ``BRAVE Act''.

SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS SYSTEM FOR 
              PATIENT OUTREACH RELATING TO MENTAL HEALTH CARE.

    (a) Establishment of System.--Chapter 17 of title 38, United States 
Code, is amended by inserting after section 1720J the following new 
section (and conforming the table of sections at the beginning of such 
chapter accordingly):
``Sec. 1720K. Mental health care: patient outreach system
    ``The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall establish a patient 
outreach system under which the Secretary shall ensure that veterans 
who are enrolled in the system of annual patient enrollment established 
and operated under section 1705 of this title and have experienced a 
traumatic or other highly stressful event, may elect to receive from 
the Secretary information relating to mental health and resources 
relating to the mental health care services available to the 
veteran.''.
    (b) Administration of System.--In administering the patient 
outreach system established under section 1720K of title 38, United 
States Code (as added by subsection (a)), the Secretary of Veterans 
Affairs shall seek to coordinate such system with the Transition 
Assistance Program of the Department of Defense.
    (c) Deadline for Establishment.--The Secretary shall establish the 
patient outreach system under such section 1720K by not later than two 
years after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Albert G. TURNER, Appellant.

No. WD 50252.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Dec. 12, 1995.

Robert L. Desselle, Independence, Daniel L. Franco, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before SMART, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and BERREY, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from jury conviction of robbery in the first degree, § 569.020, RSMo 1986, and armed criminal action, § 571.015.1, RSMo 1986, and sentence from those convictions.

Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2206

General Tools:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with
the Quarterly  Report of B Green Innovations, Inc. Inc. (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2013, as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned,
in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certify, pursuant  to and solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



1.The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



2.The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.









|                               |     |                                        | 
|------------------------------ | --- | -------------------------------------- | 
|Date:           April 29, 2014 | By: | /s/ Jerome Mahoney                     | 
|                               |     | Jerome Mahoney                         | 
|                               |     | President, Chief Executive Officer and | 
|                               |     | Chief Financial Officer                |
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5790

Tianhai Electric North America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel