alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 49 (Tuesday, March 14, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 13735]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6220]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated January 17, 1995, and published in the Federal 
Register on January 25, 1995, (60 FR 4926), MD Pharmaceutical, Inc., 
3501 West Garry Avenue, Santa Ana, California 92704, made application 
to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk 
manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed 
below:

                                                                        
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                           Drug                               Schedule  
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methylphenidate (1724)....................................  II          
Diphenoxylate (9170)......................................  II          
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    No comments or objections have been received. Therefore, pursuant 
to Section 303 of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control 
Act of 1970 and Title 21, Code of Federal Regulations, Section 
1301.54(e), the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion 
Control, hereby orders that the application submitted by the above firm 
for registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of 
controlled substances listed above is granted.

    Dated: March 8, 1995.
Gene R. Haislip,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 95-6220 Filed 3-13-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5179

Scosche Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5179 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5179

   To require the maintenance of the country of origin markings for 
    imported goods produced in the West Bank or Gaza, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 8, 2023

  Ms. Tenney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require the maintenance of the country of origin markings for 
    imported goods produced in the West Bank or Gaza, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Anti-BDS Labeling Act''.

SEC. 2. CONTINUATION IN EFFECT OF COUNTRY OF ORIGIN MARKING POLICY FOR 
              IMPORTED GOODS PRODUCED IN THE WEST BANK OR GAZA.

    The policy of the Government of the United States with respect to 
country of origin marking of imported goods produced in the West Bank 
or Gaza, notice of which was published by U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection in the Federal Register on December 23, 2020 (85 Fed. Reg. 
83984), shall remain in effect until repealed by an Act of Congress.

SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS TO RESCIND OR CHANGE THE COUNTRY OF 
              ORIGIN MARKING POLICY FOR IMPORTED GOODS PRODUCED IN THE 
              WEST BANK OR GAZA.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, none of the funds 
authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for the 
Department of State or U.S. Customs and Border Protection on or after 
the date of the enactment of this Act may be obligated or expended to 
prepare or promulgate any policy, guidance, regulation, notice, or 
Executive order or to otherwise implement, administer, or enforce any 
policy that rescinds or changes the policy of the Government of the 
United States with respect to country of origin marking of imported 
goods produced in the West Bank or Gaza, notice of which was published 
by U.S. Customs and Border Protection in the Federal Register on 
December 23, 2020 (85 Fed. Reg. 83984).
                                 <all>
```
DEMAND NOTE


$45,000                                                       April 11, 1997


On demand, U.S. Wireless Data, Inc. ("Borrower), for value received, jointly and
severally promises to pay to the order of  ________________________  ("Holders")
the sum of Forty-flve thousand ($45,000) together with interest thereon from the
date hereof until paid at the rate of 10% per annum.

The holders, In lieu of cash payment, may exercise on or after November 1, 1997,
the right to purchase -shares of the common stock of U.S. Wireless Date, Inc. at
a price  of $.35  per  share  for any or all of the  outstanding  principal  and
accrued interest.

If, by April 11, 1998, the Holders have not exercisw their aforementioned rights
to purchase  shares of common  stock In U.S.  Wireless  Data,  Inc.  and has not
previously  been paid in full,  the  outstanding  principal and interest due the
issuer will be paid in full no later than April 11, 1998.

This note shall be  construed  and enforced in  accordance  with the laws of the
State of Colorado.

Borrower:



-------------------------------
U.S. Wireless Data, Inc.
EXHIBIT 32.1



SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION



The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and shall not be deemed filed pursuant to any provision of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or any other securities law.



Each of the undersigned certifies that the foregoing
Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Corvis Corporation.



|                     |  |                                                              |  |          |  |                                                            
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------ |  | -------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------
|/s/  DAVID R. HUBER  |  | /s/  LYNN D. ANDERSON                                       
|Name:                |  | David R. Huber                                               |  | Name:    |  | Lynn D. Anderson                                           
|Title:               |  | Chairman of the Board, President, andChief Executive Officer |  | Title:   |  | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officerand Treasurer
|                     |  |                                                              | 
|Company:             |  | Corvis Corporation                                           |  | Company: |  | Corvis Corporation                                         
|                     | 
|Date: March 22, 2004 |  | Date: March 22, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 1997, and the related
consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 1997 and
the notes thereto, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
consolidated financial statements and notes.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          72,003
<SECURITIES>                                   313,218
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,987
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     15,201
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               441,409
<PP&E>                                          54,220
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,695
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 774,880
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           48,539
<BONDS>                                        287,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            46
<OTHER-SE>                                     429,231
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   774,880
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               181,323
<CGS>                                           32,081
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  121,701
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               137,639
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,816
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (65,887)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    18,805
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (84,692)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (84,692)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.93)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.93)



</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7006

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus VIRGIL W. WOMACK, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CR-00-27; CA-00-236) Submitted: August 13, 2004 Decided: August 23, 2004 Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed in part; dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion. Virgil W. Womack, Appellant Pro Se. Marvin Jennings Caughman, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, David Calhoun Stephens, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Virgil W. Womack appeals the district court’s rulings relative to an evi dentiary hearing held on June 11, 2003. Only Womack’s challenges to the district court’s rulings on his motions for return of property, for a government accounting, and for appointment of counsel are properly before this court for consideration. See Local Rule 34(b). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order reflecting its rulings relative to the motions at issue. We dismiss as moot Womack’s appeal of the district c ourt’s ruling on his motion for return of property because the district court granted the motion. We affirm the district court’s denials of Womack’s motions for a government accounting and for appointment of counsel on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Womack , No. CR-00-27; CA-00-236 (D.S.C. Feb. 11, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5930

II-VI Incorporated:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

“Made in China 2025” or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXHIBIT 10.1







Burnt Basin Mineral Claims


 




	
TENURE #

	 	
CLAIM NAME

	 	
SIZE (Ha)

	 	
EXPIRATION


DATE


	
395687

	 	
Lode #7

	 	
25.00

	 	
December 30, 2015


	
530691

	 	
Manitou

	 	
63.36

	 	
December 30, 2015


	
556586

	 	
Irish 1

	 	
147.83

	 	
December 30, 2015


	
556588

	 	
Irish 2

	 	
21.12

	 	
December 30, 2015


	
556589

	 	
Irish 3

	 	
21.11

	 	
December 30, 2015


	
556590

	 	
Irish 4

	 	
147.89

	 	
December 30, 2015


	
556696

	 	
Irish 5

	 	
84.51

	 	
December 30, 2015


	
558034

	 	
Irish 6

	 	
359.15

	 	
December 30, 2015


	
573419

	 	  	 	
760.41

	 	
December 30, 2015


	
573420

	 	  	 	
63.34

	 	
December 30, 2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ANNUAL
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN FORM 10-K AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER
31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FOOTNOTES AND
DISCLOSURES RELATED THERETO AND CONTAINED WITHIN THE 1996 FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       4,531,355
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  485,303
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,016,658
<PP&E>                                      19,507,337
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,523,995
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          620,282
<BONDS>                                     24,523,995<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,670
<OTHER-SE>                                  18,156,899
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,523,995
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,519,522<F2>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,612,428
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             124,260
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,782,834
<INCOME-TAX>                                   735,893
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,046,941
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,046,941
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .41
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDED IN BONDS, MORTGAGES IS APPROXIMATELY $1,800,000 OF MINORITY INTEREST
IN JOINT VENTURE.
<F2>TOTAL REVENUES INCLUDE EQUITY IN EARNINGS OF JOINT VENTURE TOTALING $2,255,635
</FN>


</TABLE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5465

Yanfeng US Automotive Interior Systems I LLC:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4712

Horizon Hobby LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_05.09.19.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5077

A.W. Chesterton Company:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 53 (Monday, March 20, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 14734]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6825]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Business Development Center Applications: Charleston, SC

AGENCY: Minority Business Development Agency, Commerce

ACTION: Cancellation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Minority Business Development Agency is cancelling the 
announcement to solicit competitive applications under its Minority 
Business Development Center (MBDC) Program to operate the Charleston, 
South Carolina MBDC. This solicitation was originally published in the 
Federal Register, Wednesday, January 25, 1995, Vol. 60, No. 16, 4885.

11.800  Minority Business Development Center

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance)

    Dated: March 13, 1995.
Donald L. Powers,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, Minority Business Development Agency.
[FR Doc. 95-6825 Filed 3-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-21-P