alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


In connection with the Annual Report of Cantaloupe, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2022 (the “Report”), I, Scott Stewart, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: October 19, 2022/s/ Scott StewartScott StewartChief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6240

EHYIN MOHAMOD YOUSSEF,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JERRY MONETT; MAJOR BUNDY; CAPTAIN BROWN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District

Judge. (CA-95-93-5-CT-H)

Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 5, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ehyin Mohamod Youssef, Appellant Pro Se. Trawick Hamilton Stubbs,

Jr., James M. Ayers, II, STUBBS, PERDUE & WHEELER, New Bern, North

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate

judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Youssef v.

Monett, No. CA-95-93-5-CT-H (E.D.N.C. Feb. 1, 1996). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 
 THIRD AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED 
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 This is the Third Amendment to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement which was originally effective as of
January 22, 2003, between Ameron International Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and James S. Marlen (the “Employee”) and was amended by the First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement
effective as of September 19, 2007, and the Second Amendment to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement effective as of March 22, 2010 (together the “Agreement”). 

I. 

1. Paragraph 1.1 of the Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: 

1.1 The term of this Agreement (the “Term”) commenced on January 22, 2003, and is hereby extended to the latest of
(1) March 31, 2012, (2) the Effective Time (as such term is defined in that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 1, 2011, among National Oilwell Varco, Inc., NOV Sub A, Inc. and Ameron International Corporation
(the “Merger Agreement”)) and (3) the termination of the Merger Agreement in accordance with its terms, subject to earlier termination in accordance with the provisions of Paragraphs 2.1 and 10 herein. In no event shall the Term
of this Agreement extend beyond the expiration of the Term as set forth in the preceding sentence, unless the Company and Employee hereafter expressly agree in writing to extend the Term of this Agreement beyond such date. 

II. 

Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, the Company hereby confirms and agrees that the restricted stock award
granted to the Employee on February 1, 2011 (the “Award”) shall immediately vest in full upon the consummation of a Change of Control (as defined in the Agreement), as described in the Award. 

III. 
 All other
terms and conditions of the Agreement are hereby ratified and confirmed. 
 [signature page follows] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment
Agreement effective as of July 1, 2011. 
  

			
	AMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ John E. Peppercorn

		 	 John E. Peppercorn

Chairman, Compensation Committee
 of the Board of
Directors


  

			
	EMPLOYEE
		
		 	 /s/ James S. Marlen

		 	James S. Marlen
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

April 12, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5575

TSB Wisconsin Corporation: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_04.15.19.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5210 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5210

 To direct the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to 
amend regulations relating to exemptions for engines and equipment for 
         purposes of national security, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 15, 2023

  Mr. Edwards (for himself and Mr. Panetta) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to 
amend regulations relating to exemptions for engines and equipment for 
         purposes of national security, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Maintaining Our Tactical and 
Operational Response Act'' or the ``MOTOR Act''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO REGULATIONS EXEMPTING ENGINES/EQUIPMENT FOR 
              NATIONAL SECURITY.

    Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency shall revise the 
regulations under section 1068.225 of title 40, Code of Federal 
Regulations (as in effect on the date of enactment of this Act), to 
specify that an engine or equipment is exempt under that section 
without a request described in that section if the engine or 
equipment--
            (1) is for a marine vessel;
            (2) has a rated horsepower of 60 or less; and
            (3) will be owned by a Federal, State, or local emergency 
        response or public safety agency responsible for domestic 
        response or homeland security activities.
                                 <all>
```
exhibit10-1.htm




Loan No. RX0785S1


FIRST AMENDMENT TO


PROMISSORY NOTE AND SUPPLEMENT


 


THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE AND SUPPLEMENT (this "Amendment") is entered into as of May 5, 2010, between CONNECTICUT WATER SERVICE, INC., a Connecticut corporation (the "Company") and CoBANK, ACB, a federally chartered instrumentality of the United States ("CoBank").


 


BACKGROUND


 


The Company and CoBank are parties to a Promissory Note and Supplement dated as of June 29, 2009 (the “Supplement”).  The parties now desire to amend the Supplement.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:


 


SECTION 1.                                Defined Terms. All capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given to those terms in the Master Loan Agreement dated as of June 29, 2009, between the Company and CoBank, as same may have been amended (the "MLA").


 


SECTION 2.                                Term. Section 3 of the Supplement is hereby amended and restated to read as follows:


 


Term. The term of the Commitment shall be from the date hereof up to and including June 25, 2011, or such later date as CoBank may, in its sole discretion, authorize in writing.


 


SECTION 3.                                Representations and Warranties.  To induce CoBank to enter into this Amendment, the Company represents and warrants that: (A) no consent, permission, authorization, order or license of any governmental authority or of any party to any agreement to which the Company is a party or by which it or any of its property may be bound or affected, is necessary in connection with the execution, delivery, performance or enforcement of this Amendment; (B) the Company is in compliance with all of the terms of the Loan Documents, and no Default or Event of Default exists; and (C) this Amendment has been duly authorized, executed and delivered, and creates legal, valid, and binding obligations of the Company which are enforceable in accordance with their terms, except to the extent that enforceability may be limited by applicable bankruptcy, insolvency or similar Laws affecting the rights of creditors generally.  Without limiting (B) above, the Company represents and warrants that it is in compliance with all notice provisions of the MLA, including, without limitation, the requirement to notify CoBank of the commencement of material litigation and of certain environmental matters.


 


SECTION 4.                                Confirmation. Except as amended hereby, the Supplement shall remain in full force and effect as written.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed by their duly authorized officers as of the date shown above.


 



	
CoBANK, ACB

	  	
CONNECTICUT WATER SERVICE, INC.


	
By:

	
/s/ Irene Matlin

	  	
By:

	
/s/ David C. Benoit


	
Title:

	
Assistant Corporate Secretary

	  	
Title:

	
Vice President, Finance and CFO
VELVA L. PRICE, District Clerk, Travis County Courthouse, Third Floor



### RECEIPT AND EXECUTION OF MANDATE FROM
THE COURT OF APPEALS
BY THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT CLERK

Mr. Jeffrey D. Kyle, Clerk June 19, 2015 Court of Appeals
Third District of Texas
P.O. Box 12547 Austin, Texas 78711-2547

Criminal Division P.O. Box 679004, Austin, Texas, 78767

Re: No. 03-15-00133-CR (Trial Court No.D-1-DC-12-201699)

Styled: JERRY LOUIS ALEXANDER

vs. The State of Texas

Dear Mr. Kyle:

Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 87(b)(1), I hereby forward my acknowledgment of the receipt and the execution of the mandate on JUNE 19, 2015 from the Court of Appeals in the above cause. The official execution of this mandate is recognized by the Travis County Sheriff whereas the capias after mandate, official notice of mandate, or transfer of inmate to proper authorities, has been executed and or is in the process of being executed hereby placing the defendant within the proper jurisdiction of the trial court. Respectfully,

VELVA L. PRICE
District Clerk Travis County, Texas

By: _________________________________ Deputy,JESSICA CONTRERAS

C23 - 000001038
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5031 

To reauthorize the Joint Chiefs Landscape Restoration Partnership program, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 27, 2023 

Mr. NEGUSE (for himself, Mr. ARMSTRONG, Ms. SALINAS, and Ms. SCHRIER) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committee on Natural Resources, for a 

period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 

consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Joint Chiefs Landscape Restoration 

Partnership program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Joint Chiefs Reauthor5 ization Act of 2023’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5031 IH

1 SEC. 2. JOINT CHIEFS LANDSCAPE RESTORATION PART2 NERSHIP PROGRAM. 

3 Section 40808 of the Infrastructure Investment and 

4 Jobs Act (16 U.S.C. 6592d) is amended— 

5 (1) in subsection (a)(2)— 

6 (A) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘or’’ 

7 at the end; 

8 (B) in subparagraph (C), by striking the 

9 period at the end and inserting a semicolon; 

10 and 

11 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(D) to recover from wildfires; or 

13 ‘‘(E) to enhance soil, water, and related 

14 natural resources.’’; 

15 (2) in subsection (b), by adding at the end the 

16 following: 

17 ‘‘(3) AGENCY COORDINATION.—In carrying out 

18 the Program, the Chief of the Natural Resources 

19 Conservation Service shall— 

20 ‘‘(A) consider corresponding management 

21 plans from the Chief of the Forest Service; and 

22 ‘‘(B) collaborate with the Chief of the For23 est Service on forestry science and practice, 

24 using the best available science.’’; 

25 (3) in subsection (d)(1)— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5031 IH

1 (A) in subparagraph (A), by inserting 

2 ‘‘and post-wildfire impacts’’ after ‘‘wildfire 

3 risk’’; and 

4 (B) in subparagraph (F), by inserting ‘‘, 

5 as identified in the corresponding State forest 

6 action plan or similar priority plan (such as a 

7 State wildlife or water plan)’’ before the semi8 colon; 

9 (4) in subsection (f), by striking paragraph (2) 

10 and inserting the following: 

11 ‘‘(2) inconsistent with the prohibitions under 

12 the rule of the Forest Service entitled ‘Special 

13 Areas; Roadless Area Conservation’ (66 Fed. Reg. 

14 3244 (January 12, 2001)), and subparts C and D 

15 of part 294 of title 36, Code of Federal Regulations, 

16 as applicable;’’; and 

17 (5) in subsections (g)(2) and (h)(1), by striking 

18 ‘‘and 2023’’ each place it appears and inserting 

19 ‘‘through 2028’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
PUBLIC VERSION Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
$[*********] [******]

$[*********]

INPUT

20.0

$[*********]

[******]

[******]

0.05

PUBLIC VERSION
Consistent with USTR's Section 301 notice, OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. requests

confidential treatment for the information designated as business confidential in this submission. Such

information consists of information that would not customarily be released to the public, including

business or trade secrets regarding production costs and processes, data on sales, product characteristics

customers, destinations, and other product, sales, and cost-related business secrets. Business confidential

information has been indicated herein by enclosing it in single brackets (“[ ]”). A public version of these

comments is also being filed with all confidential information removed.

OMRON in the US is the only designer of this product and only supplier of this component.

RECLINE KNOB POWER SEAT SWITCH is a molded plastic switch cover, and is used only for

automotive purposes of actuating power seat switches, of which is an OEM-specified dimension. It is

only used for further assembly of components which go into domestic automobile production, which is

specified by auto manufacturer.

This product is not a target of the US Administration's 301 investigation regarding Intellectual Property

concerns. This is not a concern to IP transfer and impressment. This product contains no IP of interest

related to autonomous vehicle production.

The tariff action ultimately poses a risk of significant damage to OMRON, the domestic automobile

industry, and ultimately the US consumer as a increase in price. Like in the case of similar approvals for

vehicle components at the HTS level, OMRON views this product in the same manner. Immediate

movement of production to a US manufacturer or another country would pose significant re-tooling

costs, significant amounts of time, and approvals pertaining to consumer automobile safety standards are

costly and would take a significant amount of time to obtain.

OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. believes that CBP can easily exclude the RECLINE

KNOB POWER SEAT SWITCH in question based solely on the product description. The following are

draft CBP exclusion instructions:

"RECLINE KNOB POWER SEAT SWITCH pear-shaped molding with two trapezoidal hollow

connectors and a cylindrical light bulb holder at one end "Plastic Recline knob (black) Made of plastic

resin - ABS with jet black paint " Dimensions 45.00mm X 20.00mm X 12.00mm."

This information will be contained on the invoice from the supplier.

PUBLIC VERSION
**EXHIBIT 31**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Henry Dattler certify that:  

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB (“Report”) of OPENLiMiT, Inc.;  

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;   

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the period presented in this Report;   

 

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;   

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and  

 

c) Disclosed in this Report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and  

 

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):   

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and   

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal controls over financial reporting. 

 

Date: July 24, 2007  

 

/s/ Henry Dattler

Henry Dattler

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED July 13, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-41520 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MARTIN ALVAREZ-GAMEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:05-CR-370-ALL

-------------------- Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Martin AlvarezGamez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5157

Enerpac:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel