alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 12
                                                                     ----------



                  PRIME MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
              FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998, 1997 AND 1996
                                   


                                               Years  Ended  December 31,
                                             1998          1997       1996
                                             ----          ----       ----

Income before income taxes and 
     after minority interest                 $18,172    $ 20,651      $10,957

Undistributed equity income                     (102)       (408)         --

Minority interest income of 
     subsidiaries with fixed charges           1,823       6,074        7,000 
                                               -----       -----      -------

Adjusted earnings                             19,893      26,317       17,957
                                              ======      ======      =======

Interest on debt                               8,469       7,477        5,977  

Debt issuance costs                            4,978         360        2,735
                                              ------        ----       ------
 
Total fixed charges                           13,447       7,837        8,712
                                              ------       -----       ------

Total available earnings 
     before fixed charges                     33,340      34,154       26,669
                                              ======      ======       ======

Ratio                                           2.5         4.4          3.1
                                                ===         ===        ======
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5000

OMRON Management Center of America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
SECOND SUPPLEMENT

                          DATED JANUARY 14, 2000 TO THE

                    CONFIDENTIAL PRIVATE PLACEMENT MEMORANDUM

                             DATED NOVEMBER 17, 1999

       Fayetteville Lithotripters Limited Partnership - South Carolina II

                  Fayetteville   Lithotripters   Limited   Partnership  -  South
Carolina II, a South Carolina limited partnership (the  "Partnership"),  by this
Second  Supplement  hereby  amends  and  supplements  its  Confidential  Private
Placement  Memorandum  of November 17, 1999,  as amended and  supplemented  (the
"Memorandum").  Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined have the
meanings  provided in the  Memorandum.  Persons who have  subscribed  for or are
considering  an  investment  in  the  Units  offered  by the  Memorandum  should
carefully review this Second Supplement.

Extension of the Offering

                  Pursuant to the authority  given to the General Partner in the
Memorandum,  the General  Partner  hereby  elects to extend the Closing  Date to
February 18, 2000 (or such earlier date as the General  Partner may, in its sole
discretion, otherwise elect).

                  Questions concerning this Second Supplement should be directed
to James Brady at 1-800-682-7971, extension 3.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-6488

OK International, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4731

Scosche Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4743

Arrowhead Electrical Products, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4181

New York Air Brake LLC:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_03.20.19.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6039

Para Systems, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Calderon, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrus, J.), both rendered May 23, 1988, convicting him of sodomy in the first degree (three counts), robbery in the first degree, sexual abuse in the first degree (three counts), criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (four counts), and endangering the welfare of a child (five counts) under indictment No. 5865/87, and kidnapping in the second degree, endangering the welfare of a child, and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree under indictment No. 10657/87, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Mangano, P. J., Kunzeman, Kooper, Sullivan and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Leroy Williams, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (David Stadtmauer, J.), rendered on November 10, 1987, unanimously affirmed. Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Kassal, Ellerin, Smith and Rubin, JJ.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

The Honorable Ralph B. Guy, Jr., Senior Circuit Judge for the Sixth ***

Circuit, sitting by designation.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JASON ALLEN SANDS,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 11-30050

D.C. No. 9:10-cr-00020-DWM-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Donald W. Molloy, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 8, 2011** 

Seattle, Washington

Before: GUY, McKEOWN, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges. *** 

Defendant appeals from his conviction for attempting to persuade or entice a

person he believed was a minor to engage in criminal sexual activity in violation of

FILED

DEC 13 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-30050

18 U.S.C. § 2422(b). Although defendant frames the issue on appeal as whether the

denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal violated the Due Process Clause, the

issue is more clearly defined as his contention that the government failed to prove the

elements of the crime charged.

Contrary to defendant’s assertions, sexual intercourse with a child is not

required to establish guilt under § 2422(b), nor is the prosecution required to prove

that an underage child was actually involved in the offense. United States v. Meek,

366 F.3d 705, 718-19 (9th Cir. 2004). It is irrelevant that Montana has a specific

offense of attempting sexual intercourse without consent. Under § 2422(b) the crime

of attempt involves an attempt to secure the consent of the minor to engage in the

criminal act. United States v. Hofus, 598 F.3d 1171, 1179 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 131

S. Ct. 364 (2010).

 AFFIRMED.
Order entered November 20, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00382-CR

VINCENT RAY SETTLES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F14-00085-J

ORDER

Pending is appellant Vincent Ray Settles’s “Motion for Inability to Pay Cost.” The 

motion is DENIED.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent RegisteredPublic Accounting Firm**

 

The Board of DirectorsCymer, Inc.:

 

Weconsent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.333-16559, No. 333-99975, No. 333-88616, No. 333-67491, No.333-48242, No. 333-69736, No. 333-58554, No. 333-109544 and No. 333-118496) onForm S-8 and in the registration statements (No. 333-88496 andNo. 333-39101) on Form S-3 of Cymer, Inc. of our reports dated March 15,2005,  relating to the consolidatedbalance sheets of Cymer, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period endedDecember 31, 2004, and the related financial statement schedule II,management's assessment of the internal control over financial reporting as ofDecember 31, 2004, and the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting as of December 31, 2004, which reports appear in theDecember 31, 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cymer, Inc.

 

 
|   | /s/ KPMG LLP |   |
|--------|--------------|--------|

 

 

San Diego, CaliforniaMarch 15, 2005

 

----
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Michael D. Queen, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Universal Capital Management, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  September 22, 2008
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5349

Alo USA Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
---

|EXHIBIT 32.2                                       
|---------------------------------------------------
|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                          
|18 U.S.C. 1350,                                    
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                             
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002

In connection with the Report of SOLAR ENERTECH
  CORP. (the Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007,
  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
  Report"), I, Ming Wai Anthea Chung, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements
  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly
  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
  of the Company.

|Date: July 3, 2007 | By:
      /s/ Ming Wai Anthea Chung
|------------------ | -----------------------------------
|                   |                                    
|                   | Ming Wai Anthea Chung              
|                   | Chief Financial Officer            

---