alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| | Exhibit 32.2
| | ------------

Certification
of Chief Financial Officerof Prime Medical Services, Inc.

|This certification is provided
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the annual
report on Form 10-K (the Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003
of Prime Medical Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Issuer).
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (i) | the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section
               15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated:  February 26, 2004.

| | /s/ John Q. Barnidge

John Q. Barnidge
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Prime Medical Services, Inc.
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being
filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in the typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by
Section 906, has been provided to the Issuer and will be retained by the Issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 67 (Friday, April 7, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 17824]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8598]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION


Meeting of the Advisory Committee on Presidential Libraries

    Notice is hereby given that the National Archives and Records 
Administration (NARA) Advisory Committee on Presidential Libraries will 
meet on Sunday, April 23 1995 from 3 p.m. until 6 p.m. in Room 100 of 
the National Archives Building, 7th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue, 
NW., Washington, DC, and on Monday, April 24, 1995 from 9 a.m. until 2 
p.m. in Room 105 of the National Archives Building.
    The agenda for the meeting will address budget and resource issues, 
and NARA and Presidential library programs in light of Federal 
government reductions.
    The meeting will be open to the public. For additional information, 
call Richard Jacobs, Acting Assistant Archivist, Office of Presidential 
Libraries at (202) 501-5700.

    Dated: March 29, 1995.
Trudy Huskamp Peterson,
Acting Archivist of the United States.
[FR Doc. 95-8598 Filed 4-6-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7515-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Jarden Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Martin E. Franklin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Martin E. Franklin 
|Martin E. Franklin     
|Chief Executive Officer
|February 23, 2009      

In connection with the Annual Report of Jarden Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ian G.H. Ashken, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Ian G.H. Ashken    
|Ian G.H. Ashken        
|Chief Financial Officer
|February 23, 2009
#### Calvin ALLEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. G & J ENTERPRISES, Mark Dixon, Darrell Barge and James Marshall, Defendants-Respondents.

No. 18402.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two.

June 10, 1993.

Rehearing Denied July 6, 1993.

*348Calvin Allen, pro se.

Mark Fitzsimmons, John Banning, Fitz-simmons, Schroeder & Nelson, Springfield, for defendants-respondents.

PREWITT, Judge.

Plaintiff’s amended petition was dismissed and he appeals. No order was made regarding a counterclaim filed by defendant Barge.

Respondents filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, contending that there was no judgment entered from which an appeal could be taken because the counterclaim remains pending and the court did not make “an express determination that there is no just reason for delay.” Rule 74.01(b). In his response to that motion plaintiff states that “[i]t is clear from the record that this partial judgment does not dispose of all the issues and all the parties.”

Except for a few types of cases covered elsewhere, § 512.020, RSMo 1986, provides for when appeals may be taken. It is applicable here. Generally, for there to be an appealable judgment under that section all claims between the parties must be determined. Rule 74.01(b); *Ritter v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.,*686 S.W.2d 563, 564 (Mo.App.1985). *Cf. also Fairfield Square Dev. Co. v. Rogalski,*767 S.W.2d 626, 628 (Mo.App.1989).

The trial court did not seek to invoke the exception stated in Rule 74.01(b). Respondents’ motion to dismiss the appeal is well taken. There is no judgment here from which an appeal will lie.

The appeal is dismissed.

FLANIGAN' and GARRISON, JJ., concur.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-5639

Nissan North America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Universal Capital Management, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ending January 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael D. Queen, Principal Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Michael D. Queen

Michael D. Queen,

Principal Executive Officer

March 14, 2013
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Larry HOWLETT, Appellant.

No. WD 46596.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Aug. 17, 1993.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Sept. 28, 1993.

Gary E. Brotherton, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before LOWENSTEIN, P.J., and ULRICH and HANNA JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was convicted of unlawful use of a weapon, a class D felony, and sentenced to five years incarceration.

Judgment Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors and Stockholders

Global ePoint, Inc. and Subsidiaries

We consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of Global ePoint, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Forms S-3 (No. 333-129938, 333-127735, 333-127734, 333-122125, 333-118770) and on Form S-8 (No. 333-127315) of our report dated April 16, 2007
relating to the consolidated financial statements of Global ePoint, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and for the year then ended, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB. Our report contains an explanatory
paragraph regarding Global ePoint, Inc. and Subsidiaries ability to continue as a going concern.



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ VASQUEZ & COMPANY LLP
|Los Angeles, California  
|April 16, 2007
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333–08837,333–33231, 333–36071, 333–57488, 333–90104, 333–116341, 33–84116, 33–84118, 33–84120, 33–84122 and 33–84124), S-3 (File Nos. 333-77399, 333–90102, 333–58110, 333–116342 and333–123579) and S-3/A (Nos. 333–58110, 333-116342 and 333-123579) of our report on the consolidated financial statements of Gateway, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) dated February 23, 2007 (which report expresses anunqualified opinion) and of our report on internal control over financial reporting of Gateway, Inc. dated February 23, 2007 (which report expressed an unqualified opinion on management’s assessment of the effectiveness of theCompany’s internal control over financial reporting and expressed an adverse opinion on the effectiveness on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting because of a material weakness) appearing in this Annual Report of Form10-K of Gateway, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006. 

 

/s/    Deloitte & Touche LLP 

 

Costa Mesa, California 

February 23, 2007
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 60 (Wednesday, March 29, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 16115]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7725]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Research Service

Notice of Intent to Grant Exclusive License

agency: Agriculture Research Service, USDA.

action: Notice of Intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

summary: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Department of 
Agriculture, Forest Service intends to grant to Schell Electronics, 
Inc., having a place of business in Chanute, Kansas, an exclusive 
license to Serial Number 08/078,341, filed June 21, 1993, ``Method of 
Controlling Animals with Electronic Fencing''. Notice of Availability 
was published in the Federal Register on September 24, 1993.

dates: Comments must be received on or before May 28, 1995.

addresses: Send comments to: Janet I. Stockhausen, USDA, Forest 
Service, Forest Products Laboratory, One Gifford Pinchot Drive, 
Madison, Wisconsin 53705-2398.

for further information contact: Janet I. Stockhausen at the address 
given above, Telephone: (608) 231-9502.

supplementary information: The Federal Government's patent rights to 
this invention are assigned to the United States of America, as 
represented by the Secretary of Agriculture. It is in the public 
interest to so license this invention as said company has submitted a 
complete and sufficient application for a license, promising therein to 
bring the benefits of said invention to the U.S. public. The 
prospective exclusive license will be royalty-bearing and will comply 
with the terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. The 
prospective exclusive license may be granted unless, within sixty days 
from the date of this published notice, the Forest Service receives 
written evidence and argument which establishes that the grant of the 
license would not be consistent with the requirements of 25 U.S.C. 209 
and 37 CFR 404.7.
Richard M. Parry, Jr.,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 95-7725 Filed 3-28-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-03-M
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 58 (Monday, March 27, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15792]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7478]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-30,542]


Scott Paper Co., Oconto Falls, WI; Notice of Negative 
Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration

    By an application dated February 21, 1995, a group of former 
workers requested administrative reconsideration of the subject 
petition for trade adjustment assistance. The denial notice will soon 
be published in the Federal Register.
    Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) reconsideration may be granted under 
the following circumstances:
    (1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered 
that the determination complained of was erroneous;
    (2) if it appears that the determination complained of was based on 
a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or
    (3) if in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a 
misinterpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of 
the decision.
    The findings show that the subject plant produced paper towels.
    The former workers submitted documentation that Scott Paper is a 
world-wide company and is increasing its capacity for paper products in 
Mexico and recently completed a deal to produce paper products in 
China.
    The Department's denial was based on the fact that U.S. imports of 
sanitary paper products were negligible (less than one percent of U.S. 
shipments) in the last three years through 1994.
    The findings show the worker separations at Scott Paper's Oconto 
Falls facility were the result of a production transfer to other 
domestic corporate facilities to realize freight advantages and be 
closer to geographic market demand.
    The Department would entertain a new petition when there is 
evidence of increased imports of paper towels.

Conclusion

    After review of the application and investigative findings, I 
conclude that there has been no error or misinterpretation of the law 
or of the facts which would justify reconsideration of the Department 
of Labor's prior decision. Accordingly, the application is denied.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 16th day of March 1995.
Victor J. Trunzo,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 95-7478 Filed 3-24-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6313

CW Bearing USA, Inc:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5663

Seaboard International, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-5154

Bergstrom, Inc: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel