Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 68 / Monday, April 10, 1995 / Notices 18149

07653) located in Armstrong County,

Pennsylvania. The petitioner proposes

to install hydraulic micro lever locks on

three of its Yale Forklift Trucks instead

of standard parking brakes due to

specific situations and concerns

outlined in their petition that reduce the

effectiveness of standard pad and drum

parking brakes. The petitioner asserts

that the proposed alternative method

would provide at least the same

measure of protection as would the

mandatory standard.

16. Tg Soda Ash, Inc.

[Docket No. M–95–06–M]

Tg Soda Ash, Inc., P.O. Box 100,

Granger, Wyoming 82934 has filed a

petition to modify the application of 30

CFR 57.22215 (separation of intake and

return air (I–A, II–A, III, and V–4

mines)) to its Wyoming Soda Ash

Operations (I.D. No. 48–00639) located

in Sweetwater County, Wyoming. The

petitioner proposes to use controlled

district recirculation of mine air to

improve mine ventilation and the

quality of the miner’s work environment

by providing an excessive airflow to

dilute and carry away dust, methane,

and diesel fumes from the mining and

abandoned areas of the mine. The

petitioner states that this recirculation

fan system would be inspected during

each operating shift on a weekly basis

and that weekly examination results

would be included in the weekly

ventilation report which would be kept

on the surface; that the fan would be

monitored and the monitors checked for

proper operation on a weekly basis by

a qualified person; that mine personnel

would be familiarized and trained on

the recirculation system, monitoring

requirements, and emergency escape

procedures; and that its emergency plan

would be updated to include the

controlled recirculation system. The

petitioner asserts that the proposed

alternative method would provide at

least the same measure of protection as

would the mandatory standard.

Request for Comments

Persons interested in these petitions

may furnish written comments. These

comments must be filed with the Office

of Standards, Regulations, and

Variances, Mine Safety and Health

Administration, Room 627, 4015 Wilson

Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22203.

All comments must be postmarked or

received in that office on or before May

10, 1995. Copies of these petitions are

available for inspection at that address.

Dated: April 3, 1995.

Patricia W. Silvey,

Director, Office of Standards, Regulations and

Variances.

[FR Doc. 95–8690 Filed 4–7–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–43–P

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION

ADMINISTRATION

Privacy Act of 1974; Revisions to

Systems of Records

AGENCY: National Credit Union

Administration.

ACTION: Notification of a revised system

of records.

SUMMARY: In accordance with the

Privacy Act of 1974, as amended, the

National Credit Union Administration

(NCUA) is issuing public notice of its

intent to modify the system of records

maintained by the Office of Inspector

General (OIG), NCUA–20, currently

titled, ‘‘Investigation Files, NCUA’’,

formerly located in the NCUA Office of

Internal Auditor. The Office of Internal

Auditor preceded the Office of Inspector

General, which was created by action of

the NCUA Board on March 23, 1989, in

response to the Inspector General Act

amendments of 1988. The proposed

modifications will: (1) Rename the

system, ‘‘Office of Inspector General

(OIG) Investigative Records—NCUA;’’

(2) drop one routine use; (3) add two

new routine uses, and (4) add certain

Privacy Act exemptions. In addition, we

are making other technical and editorial

revisions to the system to make it more

accurate.

EFFECTIVE DATE: The revised system of

records will become effective without

further notice on May 10, 1995, unless

comments postmarked or posted on the

NCUA Electronic Bulletin Board on or

before that date cause a contrary

decision. If, based on NCUA’s review of

comments received, changes are made,

NCUA will publish a new final notice.

NCUA will not withhold records under

the (j)(2) or (k)(2) exemptions until

adoption of the final rule amending 12

CFR 792.34 to add the Privacy Act (j)(2)

and (k)(2) exemptions to this system of

records.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to Becky

Baker, Secretary of the Board, National

Credit Union Administration, 1775

Duke Street, Alexandria, VA 22314.

Comments may also be posted on the

NCUA Electronic Bulletin Board at 800

876–1684 or 703 518–6480. Copies of

comments may be examined in the

Office of Inspector General, 5th floor, at

1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Alexandra B. Keith, Counsel to the

Inspector General, Office of Inspector

General, National Credit Union

Administration, 1775 Duke Street,

Alexandria, VA 22314, telephone (703)

518–6352.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

NCUA/OIG performs its duties in

accordance with the Inspector General

Act of 1978, as amended by the

Inspector General Act Amendments of

1988 (Pub. L. 95–452, as amended, 5

U.S.C. App. 3)(IG Act). The OIG is an

independent unit within the NCUA and

was established to promote economy,

efficiency, and effectiveness in the

administration of NCUA programs and

operations, and to detect and prevent

fraud, waste and abuse in such

programs and operations.

The NCUA is republishing system of

records NCUA–20, currently titled,

‘‘Investigation Files—NCUA,’’ to: (1)

Rename the system; (2) drop one routine

use; (3) add two new routine uses; (4)

add the (j)(2) and (k)(2) exemptions; and

(5) update other information in the

previously published notice in this

system of records.

NCUA is renaming NCUA–20,

currently titled, ‘‘Investigation Files—

NCUA’’, to ‘‘Office of Inspector

General—Investigative Records.’’ This is

because the former publication referred

to the investigative files of the NCUA

Office of Internal Auditor, the

predecessor office of the OIG. The

system will consist of files and records

compiled by the OIG on NCUA

employees or other persons involved

with the NCUA’s programs or

operations who have been or are under

investigation for criminal or civil fraud,

abuse, and other civil and criminal

wrongdoing related to the NCUA’s

programs and operations. The NCUA/

OIG has the authority to conduct such

investigations under the IG Act.

NCUA is omitting one routine use,

number (1) ‘‘Information gathered is

used for intra-agency purposes,’’

because this routine use duplicates an

exception in the Privacy Act, at 5 USC

552a, Section (b)(1).

NCUA is adding two new routine uses

to NCUA–20: (1) To authorize the use of

OIG investigative records for obtaining

information from other sources; and (2)

to permit the disclosure of records to the

Department of Justice to obtain legal

advice. These new routine uses are

identified as routine uses numbered 1

and 2 in the system notice. Routine use

numbered 3 is a reference to Appendix

A, the agency’s standard routine uses.

The new routine uses are compatible

with the purpose for which the OIG’s
18150 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 68 / Monday, April 10, 1995 / Notices

records were collected in that they

provide for disclosure to assist the

NCUA /OIG to collect information in the

conduct of its investigations, and to

obtain legal advice from the

government’s attorneys on the pursuit of

such investigations.

Other information in the system is

being updated to reflect changes in the

way information is retrieved, stored,

and safeguarded and to describe

accurately the categories of individuals

covered and the categories of records

being maintained.

In a separate notice published in the

proposed rule section of today’s issue of

the Federal Register, the NCUA is

giving public notice of a proposed rule

to amend 12 CFR 792.34 to exempt this

system of records from certain

provisions of 5 USC 552a under

subsections (j)(2) and (k)(2).

The NCUA proposes to exempt

certain files within the new system of

records from disclosure to individuals

who are the subject of a record in the

system. The exemptions would cover

investigative material compiled for law

enforcement purposes. The information

in this new system is proposed to be

exempt pursuant to 5 USC 552a(j)(2)

insofar as these records are maintained

by a component of the OIG, the Office

of the Assistant Inspector General for

Investigations, which performs as its

principal function any activity

pertaining to the enforcement of

criminal laws, and which consists of:

(1) Information compiled for the

purpose of identifying individual

criminal offenders and alleged

offenders;

(2) Information compiled for the

purpose of a criminal investigation,

including reports of informants and

investigators, and associated with an

identifiable individual; or

(3) Reports identifiable to an

individual compiled at any stage of the

process of enforcement of the criminal

laws from arrest or indictment through

release from supervision.

The NCUA is also proposing to

exempt NCUA–20 from certain

provisions of the Privacy Act under 5

USC 552a(k)(2), to the extent that the

system contains investigative material

compiled for law enforcement purposes,

other than material within the scope of

subsection (j)(2): Provided however,

That if any individual is denied any

right, privilege, or benefit that he would

otherwise be entitled to by Federal law,

or for which he would otherwise be

eligible, as a result of the maintenance

of such material, such material shall be

provided to such individual, except to

the extent that the disclosure of such

material would reveal the identity of a

source who furnished information to the

government under an express promise

that the identity of the source would be

held in confidence, or, prior to the

effective date of this section (9–27–75),

under an implied promise that the

identity of the source would be held in

confidence.

Accordingly, the NCUA proposes to

revise NCUA–20 as follows:

NCUA–20

SYSTEM NAME:

Office of Inspector General (OIG)

Investigative Records—NCUA.

SYSTEM LOCATION:–

Office of Inspector General, NCUA,

1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA

22314–3428.

CATEGORIES OF INDIVIDUALS COVERED BY THE

SYSTEM:

Subjects of investigation,

complainants, and witnesses referred to

in complaints or actual investigative

cases, reports, accompanying

documents, and correspondence

prepared by, compiled by, or referred to

the OIG.

CATEGORIES OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM:

The system is comprised of paper files

of all OIG and some predecessor Office

of Internal Auditor reports,

correspondence, cases, matters, crossindices, memorandums, materials, legal

papers, evidence, exhibits, data, and

workpapers pertaining to all closed and

pending investigations and inspections.

AUTHORITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE SYSTEM:

The Inspector General Act of 1978, as

amended, 5 USC App.3; 12 USC 1766.

ROUTINE USES OF RECORDS MAINTAINED IN THE

SYSTEM, INCLUDING CATEGORIES OF USERS AND

THE PURPOSES OF SUCH USES:

The National Credit Union

Administration Office of Inspector

General (NCUA/OIG) may disclose

information contained in a record in

this system of records without the

consent of the individual if the

disclosure is compatible with the

purpose for which the record was

collected, under the following routine

uses:

1. NCUA/OIG may disclose

information from this system of records

as a routine use to any public or private

source, including a federal, state, or

local agency maintaining civil, criminal,

or other relevant enforcement

information or other pertinent

information, but only to the extent

necessary for the OIG to obtain

information from those sources relevant

to an OIG investigation, audit,

inspection, or other inquiry.

2. NCUA/OIG may disclose

information from this system of records

as a routine use to the Department of

Justice to the extent necessary to obtain

its legal advice on any matter relevant

to an OIG investigation, audit,

inspection, or other inquiry related to

the responsibilities of the OIG.

3. NCUA/OIG may disclose

information from this system of records

for the purposes set forth in Appendix

A of the agency’s system of records

notice, published at 53 FR No.186, page

37373 (September 26, 1988.)

POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR STORING,

RETRIEVING, ACCESSING, RETAINING, AND

DISPOSING OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM:

STORAGE:

Information contained in this system

is stored manually in files.

RETRIEVABILITY:

Information is retrieved in files by

case number, general subject matter, or

name of the subject of investigation.

SAFEGUARDS:

Case reports and workpapers are

maintained in approved security

containers and locked filing cabinets in

a locked room. Associated paper records

are stored in locked metal filing

cabinets, safes, or similar secure

facilities.

RETENTION AND DISPOSAL:

Investigative Case Files

1. Case files are normally destroyed

when they are 5 years old.

2. Significant cases (those that result

in national media attention,

congressional investigation, or

substantive changes in agency policy or

procedures)—To be determined by the

National Archives and Records

Administration on a case-by-case basis.

SYSTEM MANAGER(S) AND ADDRESS:

Inspector General, National Credit

Union Administration, 1775 Duke

Street, Alexandria, VA 22314.

NOTIFICATION PROCEDURE:

This System of Records is generally

exempt from the notice, access, and

amendment requirements of the Privacy

Act. However, the NCUA will entertain

written requests to the systems manager

on a case by case basis for notification

regarding whether this system of records

contains information about an

individual. Requests should be marked

‘‘Privacy Act request,’’ state the name

and address of the requester, and

provide a notarized statement, or other

documentation, e.g., copy of a driver’s

license, attesting to the individual’s

identity. Requests submitted on behalf

of other persons must include their
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 68 / Monday, April 10, 1995 / Notices 18151

written, notarized authorizations. Such

requests in the form prescribed may also

be presented in person at the Office of

Inspector General, Room 5041, National

Credit Union Administration, 1775

Duke Street, Alexandria, VA 22314.

Simultaneously with requesting

notification of inclusion in this system

of records, the individual may request

record access as described in the

following section on ‘‘Record Access

Procedures.’’

RECORDS ACCESS PROCEDURES:

Same as ‘‘Notification procedure.’’

CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES:

Same as ‘‘Notification procedure.’’

RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES:

The OIG collects information from

many sources, including the subject

individuals, employees of the NCUA,

other government employees, and

witnesses and informants, and nongovernmental sources.

SYSTEMS EXEMPTED FROM CERTAIN PROVISIONS

OF THE ACT:

Pursuant to 5 USC 552a(j)(2), this

system of records is exempt from

subsections (c)(3) and (4), (d), (e)(1),

(e)(2), (e)(3), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), (e)(4)(I),

(e)(5), (e)(8), (f) and (g) of the Act. This

exemption applies to information in the

system that relates to criminal law

enforcement and meets the criteria of

the (j)(2) exemption. Pursuant to 5 USC

552(k)(2), to the extent that the system

contains investigative material compiled

for law enforcement purposes, other

than material within the scope of

subsection (j)(2), this system of records

is exempt from 5 USC 552a(c)(3), (d),

(e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (H), and (I), and (f). The

exemption rule is contained in 12 CFR

792.34 of the NCUA regulations.

Dated at Alexandria, VA, this 30th day of

March 1995.

By the National Credit Union

Administration Board.

Becky Baker,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 95–8336 Filed 4–7–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7535–01–U –

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE

ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

National Endowment for the

Humanities

Meetings of Humanities Panel

AGENCY: National Endowment for the

Humanities.

ACTION: Notice of meetings.

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of

the Federal Advisory Committee Act

(Public Law 92–463, as amended),

notice is hereby given that the following

meetings of the Humanities Panel will

be held at the Old Post Office, 1100

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,

Washington, DC 20506.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

David C. Fisher, Advisory Committee

Management Officer, National

Endowment for the Humanities,

Washington, DC 20506; telephone (202)

606–8322. Hearing-impaired individuals

are advised that information on this

matter may be obtained by contacting

the Endowment’s TDD terminal on (202)

606–8282.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

proposed meetings are for the purpose

of panel review, discussion, evaluation

and recommendation on applications

for financial assistance under the

National Foundation on the Arts the

Humanities Act of 1965, as amended,

including discussion of information

given in confidence to the agency by the

grant applicants. Because the proposed

meetings will consider information that

is likely to disclose: (1) Trade secrets

and commercial or financial information

obtained from a person and privileged

or confidential; or (2) information of a

personal nature the disclosure of which

would constitute a clearly unwarranted

invasion of personal privacy, pursuant

to authority granted me by the

Chairman’s Delegation of Authority to

Close Advisory Committee meetings,

dated July 19, 1993, I have determined

that these meetings will be closed to the

public pursuant to subsections (c) (4),

and (6) of section 552b of Title 5, United

States Code.

1. Date: April 20, 1995.

Time: 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

Room: M–14.

Program: This meeting will review

applications for Elementary and Secondary

Education in the Humanities, submitted to

the Division of Education Programs for

projects beginning after August, 1995.

2. Date: April 25, 1995.

Time: 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

Room: M–14.

Program: This meeting will review

applications for Elementary and Secondary

Education in the Humanities, submitted to

the Division of Education Programs, for

projects beginning after August, 1995.

3. Date: April 27, 1995.

Time: 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

Room: M–14.

Program: This meeting will review

applications for Elementary and Secondary

Education in the Humanities, submitted to

the Division of Education Programs, for

projects beginning after August 1995.

David C. Fisher,

Advisory Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 95–8762 Filed 4–7–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7536–01–M

NUCLEAR REGULATORY

COMMISSION

River Bend Station, Unit 1 Gulf States

Utilities Company and Cajun Electric

Power Cooperative, Inc. Finding of No

Significant Antitrust Changes Time for

Filing Requests for Reevaluation

In connection with the applications

for amendments filed by Gulf States

Utilities Company (licensee or GSU)

dated January 13, 1993, as

supplemented, the Director of the Office

of Nuclear Reactor Regulation made a

finding on October 15, 1993, that there

have been no significant changes in the

licensee’s activities or proposed

activities since the completion of the

antitrust operating license review of the

River Bend Station (River Bend).

Subsequently, an NRC order and two

licensing amendments dated December

16, 1993, were issued which transferred

GSU’s ownership in River Bend to

Entergy Corporation and the operation

of River Bend to Entergy Operations,

Inc. On March 14, 1995, the United

States Court of Appeals For the District

of Columbia Circuit issued an Order

vacating the NRC order and the two

accompanying licensing amendments

and remanding the case to the NRC.

In light of the foregoing, the Director

of the Office of Nuclear Reactor

Regulation has reviewed the Court of

Appeals decision in Cajun Electric

Cooperative, Inc. v. FERC, 28 F.3d 173

(D.C. Cir. 1994) and the earlier findings

in this matter has made a new finding

in accordance with Section 105c(2) of

the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as

amended, that no significant changes in

the licensee’s activities have occurred

subsequent to the previous antitrust

review of River Bend. The finding is as

follows:

Under Section 105 of the Atomic

Energy Act of 1954, as amended, 42

U.S.C. 2135 (Act), 10 CFR 50.80 and

50.90, the Nuclear Regulatory

Commission (NRC or Commission)

conducts an antitrust review of changes

in ownership or operator of a power

production facility after initial

licensing. In situations where requests

for a change in ownership or operator

have been received after issuance of an

operating license for such a facility, the

staff has conducted a significant change

review to determine whether the