alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PUBLIC VERSION
$[*********] [******]

$[*********]

INPUT

20.0

$[*********]

[******]

[******]

0.05

PUBLIC VERSION
Consistent with USTR's Section 301 notice, OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. requests

confidential treatment for the information designated as business confidential in this submission. Such

information consists of information that would not customarily be released to the public, including

business or trade secrets regarding production costs and processes, data on sales, product characteristics

customers, destinations, and other product, sales, and cost-related business secrets. Business confidentia

information has been indicated herein by enclosing it in single brackets (“[ ]”). A public version of

these comments is also being filed with all confidential information removed.

OMRON in the US is the only designer of this product and only supplier of this component.

HOUSING SUB ASSY DOOR LOCK SWITCH is a molded plastic item designed to contain automotive

cabin switches, and is used only for automotive purposes. It is only used for further assembly of

subcomponents which go into domestic automobile production. which is specified by the auto

manufacturer.

This product is not a target of the US Administration's 301 investigation regarding Intellectual Property

concerns. This is not a concern to IP transfer and impressment. This product contains no IP of interest

related to autonomous vehicle production.

The tariff action ultimately poses a risk of significant damage to OMRON, the domestic automobile

industry, and ultimately the US consumer as an increase in price. Like in the case of similar approvals

for vehicle components at the HTS level, OMRON views this product in the same manner.

Immediate movement of production to a US manufacturer or another country would pose significant

re-tooling costs, significant amounts of time, and approvals pertaining to consumer automobile safety

standards are costly and would take a significant amount of time to obtain.

OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. believes that CBP can easily exclude the HOUSING

SUB ASSY DOOR LOCK SWITCH relay in question based solely on the product description. The

following are draft CBP exclusion instructions:

"HOUSING SUB ASSY DOOR LOCK SWITCH rectangular base with rounded corners, and an

elevated rectangular switch actuator featuring a padlock "locked" and padlock "unlocked" symbol

oriented lengthwise to each end of the switch actuator consisting of: 1) 1 plastic knob2) Plastic house 1

pc3) Plastic Plunger; dimensions are 49.00mm X 29.00mm X 43.9mm."

This information will be contained on the invoice from the supplier

PUBLIC VERSION
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-40886

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ALEJANDRO GARCIA-RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. M-97-CR-95-1

- - - - - - - - - -

February 10, 1998

Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Alejandro Garcia-Rodriguez argues that the indictment to

which he pleaded guilty did not allege that he had been convicted

previously of a felony, he pleaded guilty to simple reentry, see

8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), and therefore, the increase to his sentence

based on his prior felony conviction is improper. In light of

controlling authority, see United States v. Vasquez-Olvera, 999

F.2d 943, 945-46 (5th Cir. 1993), the conviction and sentence are

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.1



Section 906 Certification



The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and shall not be deemed filed pursuant to any provision of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or any other securities law.



Each of the undersigned certifies that the foregoing Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Broadwing Corporation.



|                   |  |                                      |  |          |  |                                                  
|------------------ |  | ------------------------------------ |  | -------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|/s/ David R. Huber |  | /s/ Lynn D. Anderson                
|Name:              |  | David R. Huber                       |  | Name:    |  | Lynn D. Anderson                                 
|Title:             |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |  | Title:   |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
|Company:           |  | Broadwing Corporation                |  | Company: |  | Broadwing Corporation                            
|Date:              |  | May 6, 2004                          |  | Date:    |  | May 6, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 65 (Wednesday, April 5, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 17363]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8318]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Advisory Council for the Elimination of Tuberculosis: Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the following council meeting.

    Name: Advisory Council for the Elimination of Tuberculosis 
(ACET).
    Times and Dates: 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m., April 26, 1995; 8:30 a.m.-1 
p.m., April 27, 1995.
    Place: Corporate Square Office Park, Corporate Square Boulevard, 
Building 11, Room 1413, Atlanta, Georgia 30329.
    Status: Open to the public, limited only by the space available.
    Purpose: This council advises and makes recommendations to the 
Secretary of Health and Human Services, the Assistant Secretary for 
Health, and the Director, CDC, regarding the elimination of 
tuberculosis. Specifically, the council makes recommendations 
regarding policies, strategies, objectives, and priorities; 
addresses the development and application of new technologies; and 
reviews the extent to which progress has been made toward 
eliminating tuberculosis.
    Matters to be Discussed: Tuberculosis in foreign-born persons; 
ACET Strategic Plan to Eliminate Tuberculosis Progress Report; 
future priorities and direction for ACET; Tuberculosis Morbidity 
Update; funding issues and block grants; respiratory protection for 
tuberculosis infection control; and an update on issues related to 
surveillance for tuberculosis and HIV.
    Agenda items are subject to change as priorities dictate.
    Contact Person for More Information: Samuel W. Dooley, Jr., 
M.D., Acting Associate Director for Science, National Center for 
Prevention Services, CDC, and Acting Executive Secretary, ACET, 1600 
Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop E-07, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, telephone 
404/639-8006.
Carolyn J. Russell,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention (CDC).
[FR Doc. 95-8318 Filed 4-4-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-M
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT 23

Consent of Independent Accountants

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
Envirotest Systems Corp. and Subsidiaries on Form  S-8 (File No. 33-81556) of
our reports dated December 13, 1996, on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedule of Envirotest Systems Corp. and
Subsidiaries as of September 30, 1996 and 1995, and for the years ended
September 30, 1996, 1995 and 1994, which reports are included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.


/s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.

San Jose, California
December 30, 1996
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

 

**INDEPENDENTAUDITORS’  REPORT ON SCHEDULE ANDCONSENT**

 

 

The Board of DirectorsCymer, Inc.:

 

The audits referred toin our report dated January 27, 2003 included the related financial statementschedule as of December 31, 2002, and for each of the years in the three-yearperiod ended December 31, 2002, included in the 2002 Annual Report on Form10-K. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company’smanagement. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this financialstatement schedule based on our audits. In our opinion, such financialstatement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidatedfinancial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all materialrespects, the information set forth therein.

 

We consent toincorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-16559,No. 333-99975, No. 333-88616, No. 333-67491, No. 333-48242, No.333-69736, and No. 333-58554) on Form S-8 and in the registration statements(No. 333-88496 and No. 333-39101) on Form S-3 of Cymer, Inc. of our reportdated January 27, 2003 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Cymer,Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2002, and the relatedconsolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows foreach of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002, whichreport appears in the December 31, 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K ofCymer, Inc.  Our report refers to a changein the Company’s method of accounting for goodwill in 2002.

 

 
|                   | /s/  KPMG LLP |   |
|------------------------|---------------|--------|
|                   |          |
|                   |          |
| San  Diego, California |          |
| March  27, 2003        |          |

 

----
<PAGE>

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

Arcadia Financial Ltd.
Board of Directors

We have audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the
consolidated balance sheet of Arcadia Financial Ltd. (the Company) as of
December 31, 1999, and the related consolidated statements of operations and
comprehensive income, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for the year then
ended and have issued our report thereon dated February 29, 2000 (which report
expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph
concerning the Company's change in its method of accounting for recognition of
sales of asset-backed securities); such financial statements and report thereon
are included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1999.

Our audit, referred to in the preceding paragraph, included procedures applied
to the documents, records, and delinquency and loss rates of the Company that we
considered necessary in the circumstances to enable us to express an opinion on
the financial statements referred to above taken as a whole. Because the
procedures performed in connection with our audit do not constitute an audit of
the documents, records and delinquency and loss rates, we do not express an
opinion on those documents, records, or delinquency and loss rates.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
February 29, 2000
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5338

Arrowhead Electrical Products, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-2906

Applica Water Products LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jalam M. OLIVER, Appellant.

No. WD 50030.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

June 18, 1996.

Susan L. Hogan, Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Jill C. LaHue, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before LAURA DENVIR STITH, P.J., and ULRICH and SMART, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Jalam Oliver appeals from the judgment on his convictions after a trial to the court of second degree murder, first degree assault and armed criminal action arising out of a drive-by shooting in 1993. Mr. Oliver contends on appeal that there was insufficient evidence that he acted with the requisite culpable mental state to support the convictions. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the evidence supported the judgment and that there was no error. Because a published opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential value, we affirm by this summary order under Rule 30.25(b). In addition, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth our reasoning.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16A0412. SAUER v. PA LEX GLEN, LLC.

Paul Sauer filed his notice of appeal on September 9, 2015. Sauer moved for

an extension of time to file his appellate brief on November 12, 2015, which this

court granted, giving him until December 7, 2015. On December 4, Sauer moved for

a second extension of 90 days to allow the court reporter time to prepare and file the

trial transcript, and for Sauer to prepare and file his brief. This court did not enter an

order on Sauer’ssecond motion for an extension prior to the deadline for Sauer to file

his brief. Sauer filed his brief on the December 7th deadline. Thereafter, this court

entered an order denying his second motion for an extension as moot because Sauer

had already filed his brief. Sauer’s notice of appeal instructed the clerk of the trial

court not to “omit anything from the record on appeal.” The trial court sent up

thirteen volumes of records, but the trial transcript was omitted. The nature of Sauer’s

enumerations of error require review of the trial transcript. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that the case be REMANDED to the trial

court for completion of the record. Once the completed transcript is on file with the

trial court and the trial court has entered an order stating that the record is complete

or that it cannot be completed, Sauer shall have 30 days from the date of the

mandated order to refile his notice of appeal; and upon the filing of such notice of

appeal the case with the complete record and transcript shall be transmitted to this

May 04, 2016
Court for redocketing.

1

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

1

See Galardi v. Steele-Inman, 259 Ga. App. 249-50 (576 SE2d 555) (2002);

OCGA § 5-6-48(d) (pertinently providing that “[a]t any stage of the proceedings, 

. . . the court shall by order, either with or without motion, . . . require that additional

portions of the record or transcript of proceedings be sent up, or require that a

complete transcript of evidence and proceedings be prepared and sent up, or take any

other action to perfect the appeal and record so that the appellate court can and will

pass upon the appeal and not dismiss it.”); 1983 Ga. Const., Art. VI, § 1, Par. IV.

05/04/2016
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          55,405
<SECURITIES>                                    10,449
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,080
<ALLOWANCES>                                       706
<INVENTORY>                                     15,678
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               112,994
<PP&E>                                          17,415
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,708
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 129,467
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,251
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                      98,806
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   129,467
<SALES>                                         62,510
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                64,995
<CGS>                                           35,583
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,853
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                21,528
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   741
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 467
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,701
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,191
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,510
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,510
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .56
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 69 (Tuesday, April 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 18440]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8841]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
[Dept. Circ. 570, 1994 Rev., Supp. No. 19]


Surety Companies Acceptable on Federal Bonds; American Safety 
Casualty Insurance Company

    A Certificate of Authority as an acceptable surety on Federal Bonds 
is hereby issued to the following company under Sections 9304 to 9308, 
Title 31, of the United States Code. Federal bond-approving officers 
should annotate their reference copies of the Treasury Circular 570, 
1994 Revision, on page 34144 to reflect this addition:

American Safety Casualty Insurance Company. BUSINESS ADDRESS: 1900 The 
Exchange, Suite 450, Atlanta, Ga 30339. PHONE: (404) 916-1908. 
UNDERWRITING LIMITATION b/: $584,000. SURETY LICENSES c/: AL, AK, CA, 
CO, DE, DC, FL, GA, IN, IA, KS, MN, MS, NE, NV, NM, ND, OH, OK, PA, SC, 
SD, TN, TX, UT, VA, WA, WI. INCORPORATED IN: Delaware.

    Certificates of Authority expire on June 30 each year, unless 
revoked prior to that date. The certificates are subject to subsequent 
annual renewal as long as the companies remain qualified (31 CFR Part 
223). A list of qualified companies is published annually as of July 1 
in Treasury Department Circular 570, with details as to underwriting 
limitations, areas in which licensed to transact surety business and 
other information.
    Copies of the Circular may be obtained from the Surety Bond Branch, 
Funds Management Division, Financial Management Service, Department of 
the Treasury, Washington, DC 20227, telephone (202) 874-6850.

    Dated: April 4, 1995.
Charles F. Schwan III,
Director, Funds Management Division, Financial Management Service.
[FR Doc. 95-8841 Filed 4-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-M