alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5263 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to ensure that removal and remedial 

actions relating to PFAS contamination result in levels meeting or exceeding certain standards, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 22, 2023 

Ms. SLOTKIN (for herself, Mr. POSEY, and Mr. KHANNA) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and 

in addition to the Committees on Transportation and Infrastructure, and 

Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to ensure that removal 

and remedial actions relating to PFAS contamination 

result in levels meeting or exceeding certain standards, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘PFAS Strictest Stand5 ard Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5263 IH

1 SEC. 2. STANDARDS FOR RESPONSE ACTIONS WITH RE2 SPECT TO PFAS CONTAMINATION. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—In conducting a response action 

4 to address perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substance con5 tamination from Department of Defense or National 

6 Guard activities, the Secretary of Defense shall conduct 

7 such actions to achieve a level of such substances in the 

8 environmental media that meets or exceeds the most strin9 gent of the following standards for each applicable 

10 perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substance in any environ11 mental media: 

12 (1) A State standard, in effect in the State in 

13 which the response action is being conducted, as de14 scribed in section 121(d)(2)(A)(ii) of the Com15 prehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, 

16 and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 

17 9621(d)(2)(A)(ii)). 

18 (2) A Federal standard, as described in section 

19 121(d)(2)(A)(i) of the Comprehensive Environmental 

20 Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 

21 (42 U.S.C. 9621(d)(2)(A)(i)). 

22 (3) A health advisory under section 

23 1412(b)(1)(F) of the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 

24 U.S.C. 300g–1(b)(1)(F)). 

25 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 5263 IH

1 (1) PERFLUOROALKYL OR POLYFLUOROALKYL

2 SUBSTANCE.—The term ‘‘perfluoroalkyl or polyfluo3 roalkyl substance’’ means any man-made chemical 

4 with at least one fully fluorinated carbon atom. 

5 (2) RESPONSE ACTION.—The term ‘‘response 

6 action’’ means an action taken pursuant to section 

7 104 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 

8 Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 

9 9601). 

10 (c) SAVINGS CLAUSE.—Except with respect to the 

11 specific level required to be met under subsection (a), 

12 nothing in this section affects the application of the Com13 prehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and 

14 Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9607). 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 9 (Friday, January 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 3258]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-853]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Minerals Management Service


Environmental Documents Prepared for Proposed Oil and Gas 
Operations on the Gulf of Mexico Outer Continental Shelf (OCS)

agency: Minerals Management Service, Interior.

action: Publication of revised Outer Continental shelf protraction 
diagrams.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

summary: Notice is hereby given that effective with this publication, 
the following Louisiana Leasing Maps, last revised on the date 
indicated, are on file and available for information only, in the Gulf 
of Mexico OCS Regional Office, New Orleans, Louisiana. In accordance 
with Title 43, Code of Federal Regulations, these Official Protraction 
Diagrams are the basic record for the description of mineral and oil 
and gas lease sales in the geographic areas they represent.

                                                                        
                              *Revised Maps                             
------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Description                      Latest revision date       
------------------------------------------------------------------------
South Timbalier Area, LA-6.........  December 30, 1994.                 
Bay Marchand Area, LA-6C...........  December 30, 1994.                 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Changes include separation of Louisiana Leading Map South Timbalier and
  Bay Marchand Areas, LA-6, to form individual Louisiana Leasing Maps   
  South Timbalier Area, LA-6, and Bay Marchand Area, LA-6C.             

for further information contact: Copies of these Official Protraction 
Diagrams may be purchased for $2.00 each from the Public Information 
Unit (MS 5034), Minerals Management Service, Gulf of Mexico OCS Region, 
1201 Elmwood Park Boulevard, New Orleans, Louisiana 70123-2394 or by 
telephone at (504) 736-2519.

supplementary information: Technical comments or questions pertaining 
to these maps should be directed to the Office of Leasing and 
Environment, Supervisor, Sales and Support Unit at (504) 736-2768.

    Dated: January 4, 1995.
Chris C. Oynes,
Acting Regional Director, Gulf of Mexico OCS Region.
[FR Doc. 95-853 Filed 1-12-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MR-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 66 (Thursday, April 6, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 17602]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8418]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 2185]


Overseas Schools Advisory Council; Meeting

    The Overseas Schools Advisory Council, Department of State, will 
hold its Annual Committee Meeting on Thursday, June 15, 1995 at 9:30 
a.m. in Conference Room 1408, Department of State Building, 2201 C 
Street, NW., Washington, DC The meeting is open to the public.
    The Overseas Schools Advisory Council works closely with the U.S. 
business community in improving those American-sponsored schools 
overseas which are assisted by the Department of State and which are 
attended by dependents of U.S. government families and children of 
employees of U.S. corporations and foundations abroad.
    This meeting will deal with issues related to the work and the 
support provided by the Overseas Schools Advisory Council to the 
American-sponsored overseas schools.
    Members of the general public may attend the meeting and join in 
the discussion, subject to the instructions of the Chairman. Admittance 
of public members will be limited to the seating available. Access to 
the State Department is controlled and individual building passes are 
required for each attendee. Persons who plan to attend should so advise 
the office of Dr. Ernest N. Mannino, Department of State, Office of 
Overseas Schools, SA-29, Room 245, Washington, DC 20522-2902, telephone 
703-875-7800, prior to May 18, 1995. Visitors will be asked to provide 
their date of birth and Social Security number at the time they 
register their intention to attend and must carry a valid photo ID with 
them to the meeting. All attendees must use the C Street entrance to 
the building.

    Dated: March 24, 1995.
Ernest N. Mannino,
Executive Secretary, Overseas Schools Advisory Council.
[FR Doc. 95-8418 Filed 4-5-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-24-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 26, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-4283

Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
# Exhibit 21.1 Ener1, Inc. Subsidiaries Jurisdiction of
Incorporation

# Name

---

|                                          |                            
|----------------------------------------- | ---------------------------
|Boca Global, Inc.                         | Florida                    
|Boca Research International, Inc.         | United States Virgin Island
|Boca Research Holland B.V                 | Holland                    
|Boca Research (UK) Limited                | United Kingdom             
|Boca Research International Holding, Ltd. | Mauritius                  
|AppsCom, Inc.                             | Florida                    
|EnerNow Technologies, Inc.                | Florida                    
|Ener EL Holdings, Inc.                    | Florida                    
|Ener1 Technologies, Inc.                  | Florida                    
|Ener1 Battery Company                     | Florida                    
|EnerFuel, Inc.                            | Florida                    
|NanoEner, Inc.                            | Florida                    
|EnerDel, Inc.                             | Delaware
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4661

Seaboard International, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Exhibit 32.2
 
 
 Certification of Acting co-CFOs Pursuant to
 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 as Adopted Pursuant to
 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of GAMCO Investors, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Jeffrey M. Farber, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:
 
 (1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/ Jeffrey M. Farber
 Name: Jeffrey M. Farber
 Title:   Chief Financial Officer
 Date:   November 6, 2009
 
 This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<PAGE>


                              AMENDED AND RESTATED
                         HORIZON GROUP PROPERTIES, INC.
                                    BY-LAWS

                     Originally adopted as of April 28, 1998
                  First Amendment adopted as of March 17, 1999

         Pursuant to Article 10 of the Amended and Restated By-Laws of Horizon
Group Properties, Inc. (the "Corporation") and by the action of the Board of
Directors of the Corporation at the meeting of the Board of Directors on March
17, 1999, Section 2.02 of the Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Corporation is
hereby replaced in its entirety with the following new Section 2.02:

         "Section 2.02 ANNUAL MEETING. The 1999 annual meeting of the
         stockholders shall be held on Tuesday, June 15, 1999 at 11:00 a.m.,
         local time. Each succeeding annual meeting of the stockholders shall be
         held on the second Tuesday in May, at such place and time as determined
         by the Board of Directors. At each annual meeting, stockholders
         entitled to vote shall elect the members of the Board of Directors and
         transact such other business as may be properly brought before the
         meeting in accordance with the Articles of Amendment and Restatement of
         the Corporation (the "Articles") and, to the extent not inconsistent
         therewith, notice procedures specified in Section 2.04 below."

This first Amendment to the Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Corporation is
adopted as of March 17, 1999.


                                      29
<PAGE>


                                     EXHIBIT 21

                              ENVIROTEST SYSTEMS CORP
                           ENVIROTEST TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                                    SUBSIDIARIES


                              ENVIROTEST SYSTEMS CORP.

    Subsidiary                        Jurisdiction of Incorporation
    ----------                        -----------------------------

Envirotest Technologies, Inc. (1)           Delaware
Ebco-Hamilton Test Systems Ltd. (4)         British Columbia
Hamilton Test Systems (B.C.) Ltd. (1)       British Columbia
EBCO-Hamilton Partners (2)                  British Columbia
Envirotest Partners (3)                     Pennsylvania
                                                  (Partnership)
Remote Sensing Technologies, Inc. (1)       Delaware
Envirotest Wisconsin Inc. (1)               Wisconsin
Systems Control. Inc. (1)                   Washington
ES Funding Corp. (1)                        Delaware
Envirotest Holdings, Inc. (1)               Delaware
Envirotest Acquisition Co. (1)              Delaware
EBCO Automotive Testing LTD. (1)            British Columbia


                           ENVIROTEST TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

None.

(1) Wholly owned
(2) Controlled by Envirotest, but less than wholly-owned
(3) Wholly owned by Envirotest Systems Corp. and Envirotest Technologies,
    Inc. 
(4) Wholly owned by Envirotest Systems Corp. and EBCO Automotive Testing
    LTD.
#### In re the MARRIAGE OF Richard L. PUERTA, Petitioner/Respondent, and Karen R. Puerta, Respondent/Appellant.

No. 62172.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Dec. 22, 1992.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Feb. 10, 1993.

Michael B. Stern, Richard W. Fischer, Mertz, Stern, Frapolli & Steiger, St. Louis, for respondent/appellant.

Joel D. Brett, Barklage, Barklage, Haywood & Brett, P.C., St. Charles, for petitioner/respondent.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Wife appeals the dismissal of her Rule 74.06 motion wherein she sought to set aside a dissolution decree because husband had allegedly committed fraud in procuring wife’s compliance with the terms of the settlement agreement and the dissolution. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.-16(b).
#### William B. GROVES, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 51895.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Submitted April 26, 1996.

June 18, 1996.

Rebecca L. Kurz, Asst. Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Joanne E. Joiner, Asst. Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before LAURA DENVIR STITH, P.J., and ULRICH and SMART, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

William B. Groves pleaded guilty to committing the crime of sodomy in violation of § 566.060, RSMo 1994, and was sentenced as a prior offender to twenty-five years imprisonment. He appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion, in which he alleged that counsel misled him as to the sentence he would receive.

The arguments of appellant have been carefully considered, and are found to be without merit. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum of the reasons for the decision has been furnished to the parties.
#### Freddie Ray LOCKETT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 591-93.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.

Sept. 15, 1993.

Kent A. Schaffer, Houston, for appellant.

Bill Turner, Dist. Atty., and Lisa Tanner, Asst. Dist. Atty., Bryan, Robert Huttash, State’s Attyi, Austin, for the State.

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

PER CURIAM.

Appellant pled nolo contendere to aggravated possession of a controlled substance. The trial court found appellant guilty and, pursuant to a plea agreement, assessed punishment at confinement for thirty-eight years. The Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. *Lockett v. State,*852 S.W.2d 636 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th] 1993). Appellant filed a petition for discretionary review contending, inter alia, that the Court of Appeals erred by failing to address an issue raised by appellant in the trial court and in the Court of Appeals. He contends the Court of Appeals did not review the validity of the federal search warrant under either the Fourth Amendment or Article I, § 9 of the Texas Constitution. He also argues that the court failed to review the state search warrant under Fourth Amendment principles.

The Court of Appeals overruled appellant’s search and seizure points without separately addressing appellant’s contentions under the Fourth Amendment and Article I, § 9 of the Texas Constitution. Therefore, we summarily grant ground four of appellant’s petition for discretionary review. See Tex.R.App. Pro. 90(a). Appellant’s remaining grounds of error are dismissed without prejudice. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals to consider appellant’s ground four.

McCORMICK, P.J., and CLINTON and MEYERS, JJ., dissent.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4996

OMRON Management Center of America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6377

Apergy ESP Systems, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel