alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 12/31/95 AND
12/31/96 CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 12/31/95 AND 12/31/96 FORM
10 K FILINGS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            29,167
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                           23,479
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                             23,263
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  52,646
<CASH>                                          36,441
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              69,242
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          14,509
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 261,959
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                138,133
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             60,065
<POLICY-OTHER>                                   7,913
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                              827
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           34,793
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            71
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,485
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   261,959
<PREMIUMS>                                     107,217
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              4,470
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                (74)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                     424
<BENEFITS>                                     107,473
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     47,848
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            47,219
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (44,416)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (44,416)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (44,416)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (6.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (6.32)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                  57,852
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                             88,885
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                               18,588
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                              48,063
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                43,111
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                 74,151
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                       (10,242)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM GATEWAY 2000,
INC.'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
1996 AND THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-10-1996
<CASH>                                         362,552
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  384,768
<ALLOWANCES>                                    14,044
<INVENTORY>                                    199,091
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,000,486
<PP&E>                                         364,396
<DEPRECIATION>                                  81,659
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,310,775
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          587,049
<BONDS>                                          8,128
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           766
<OTHER-SE>                                     660,852
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,310,775
<SALES>                                      2,279,464
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,279,464
<CGS>                                        1,849,884
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,849,884
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 7,269
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 322
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                154,302
<INCOME-TAX>                                    52,463
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            101,839
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   101,839
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.65
        


</TABLE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3372

ADH Guardian USA LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_5-30-2019.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5713

A.W. Chesterton Company:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5579

Tianhai Electric North America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5208

Scosche Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7164

LACY WILLIAMS, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MARVIN L. POLK; BOYD BENNETT; CATHY JUDGE;

JENNIE LANCASTER; MARSHALL PIKE; BENNY

LANGDON; JOHN A. MANESS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan,

District Judge. (CA-04-144-5-FL)

Submitted: December 23, 2004 Decided: January 10, 2005

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lacy Williams, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Lacy Williams, Jr., appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Williams v.

Polk, No. CA-04-144-5-FL (E.D.N.C. Apr. 20, 2004). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-30761 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ANTONIO SALAZAR-ROJAS, also known as Manuel Lopez-Gonzalez, also known as Jesus Antonio Salazar, also known as Antonio Salazar, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 01-CR-20-ALL-S

-------------------- February 20, 2002 Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Antonio Salazar-Rojas appeals the sentence imposed by the district court following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry into the United States after deportation. He argues that his prior conviction for unauthorized entry of an inhabited dwelling was an element of the offense which should have been alleged in the indictment in view of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). The indictment alleged that he had a different felony conviction for simple criminal damage toNo. 01-30761 -2- property in an amount exceeding $500. Salazar-Rojas’ argument is foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998). He states that he is raising this issue to preserve it for possible Supreme Court review in view of Apprendi

. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; see also United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), cert . denied , 121 S. Ct. 1214 (2001). This court must follow controlling Supreme Court precedent until the Supreme Court itself overrules it. See Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984. AFFIRMED.
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Horacio T. LEE, Appellant.

No. WD 51287.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

May 21, 1996.

David Simpson, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for Appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Christine M. Blegan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for Respondent.

Before EDWIN H. SMITH, P.J., and BRECKENRIDGE and ELLIS, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from conviction of attempted murder in the first degree, § 564.011, RSMo 1994; assault of a law enforcement officer, § 565.081, RSMo 1994; unlawful use of a weapon, § 571.030.1(1), RSMo 1994; and, armed criminal action, § 571.015, RSMo 1994, for which he was sentenced to two concurrent life sentences to run consecutively to a thirty year term of imprisonment and a ten year term of imprisonment which are to run concurrently.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-5384

Robert Bosch Tool:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4947 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4947

To modify the conditions for the termination of an oversight board, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 26, 2023

     Mr. Torres of New York (for himself, Mrs. Gonzalez-Colon, Ms. 
     Velazquez, Mr. Soto, Ms. Ocasio-Cortez, Mr. Grijalva, and Mr. 
  Espaillat) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To modify the conditions for the termination of an oversight board, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Territorial Relief Under Sustainable 
Transitions for Puerto Rico Act of 2023'' or the ``TRUST for Puerto 
Rico Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONS FOR TERMINATION.

    (a) In General.--Section 209 of the Puerto Rico Oversight, 
Management, and Economic Stability Act (48 U.S.C. 2149) is amended--
            (1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking 
        ``upon'' and inserting ``not later than 90 days after'';
            (2) in subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2), by inserting 
        ``and without regard to whether the applicable Budget provides 
        for the payment of debt service'' after ``standards'';
            (3) by striking ``(1) the applicable'' and all that follows 
        through ``(2) for at least 4'' and inserting ``for at least 
        2''; and
            (4) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) and (B) as 
        paragraphs (1) and (2), respectively, and moving each such 
        paragraph, as so redesignated, 2 ems to the left.
    (b) Effective Date.--Each amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect and apply as if enacted as part of the Puerto Rico 
Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act.
    (c) Transfer of Functions.--Upon a certification of an Oversight 
Board under section 209 of the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and 
Economic Stability Act (48 U.S.C. 2149), as amended by subsection (a), 
with respect to termination, and upon the adoption of a resolution by 
the legislature of a territory and signed by that territory's governor 
setting forth the manner in which such termination shall be 
implemented--
            (1) all property, funds, assets, and records of the 
        Oversight Board shall be transferred to the territorial 
        government in accordance with the transition provisions 
        established by such adopted resolution; and
            (2) a copy of all such records of the Oversight Board shall 
        be transmitted to Congress.
                                 <all>
```
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3331

ECM Industries LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_5-30-2019.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4964

Apergy ESP Systems, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel