alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
                                   ACT OF 2002

I, H. M. Busby, Chief Executive Officer of Planet Polymer Technologies, Inc.,
certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Planet Polymer
Technologies, Inc.;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

     4.   The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15-15(c)) for the registrant and have:

     a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

     b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c)   Disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and;

     5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report information; and

     b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

/s/ H. M. Busby

H. M. Busby, Chief Executive Officer

/s/ H. M. Busby

H. M. Busby, Chief Financial Officer

March 30, 2004
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6607

SGRE, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 65 (Wednesday, April 5, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 17312]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8474]

      
========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 65 / Wednesday, April 5, 1995 / 
Notices
[[Page 17312]]

ADMINISTRATIVE CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES

Committee on Governmental Processes

ACTION: Notice of Public Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. No. 
92-463), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Committee on 
Governmental Processes of the Administrative Conference of the United 
States.

DATES: Wednesday, April 12, 1995, at 1:30 p.m.

LOCATION: Office of the Chairman, Administrative Conference of the 
United States, Suite 500, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC (Library, 
5th Floor).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Deborah S. Laufer, Office of the Chairman, 
Administrative Conference of the United States, 2120 L Street, NW., 
Suite 500, Washington, DC 20037. Telephone: (202) 254-7020.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Committee on Governmental Processes will 
meet to continue discussion of when federal government lawyers and 
other government employees may participate in voluntary public service 
activities. There are possible restrictions in conflict of interest 
statutes, and both government-wide and agency-specific regulations 
governing employee participation in outside activities, ethics laws, 
and the use of government property.

    Dated: March 31, 1995.
Jeffrey S. Lubbers,
Research Director.
[FR Doc. 95-8474 Filed 4-4-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6110-01-W
```
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
Number 33-60622 on Form S-8 dated March 31, 1993, Registration Statement Number
33-60730 on Form S-8 dated March 31, 1993, Registration Statement Number
333-27459 on Form S-8 dated May 20, 1997, Registration Statement Number
333-27461 on Form S-8 dated May 20, 1997, Registration Statement Number
333-67033 on Form S-8 dated November 10, 1998, Registration Statement Number
333-87996 on Form S-8 dated May 10, 2002, Registration Statement Number
333-89862 on Form S-4/A dated October 24, 2002, Registration Statement Number
333-102387 on Form S-3/A dated January 29, 2003, Registration Statement Number
333-105081 on Form S-8 dated May 8, 2003 and Registration Statement Number
333-109353 on Form S-4 dated October 1, 2003, of our reports dated March 1,
2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
Jarden Corporation and subsidiaries, Jarden Corporation management's assessment
of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Jarden
Corporation, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 2) for
the year ended December 31, 2004.

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

New York, New York
May 16, 2005
```
#### Max Farash, Appellant-Respondent, v Central Trust Company, as Executor of Philip Liebschutz, Deceased, Respondent-Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the amended decision of Monroe County Surrogate’s Court, Ciaccio, S. (Appeals from order of Monroe County Surrogate’s Court, Ciaccio, S.—summary judgment.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3989

Enerpac:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's audited December 31, 1996 Balance Sheet and Statement of Operations
for the twelve months ended December 31, 1996 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such statements as filed in the Company's Form 10-KSB for the
year ended December 31, 1996.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,640,392
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  533,386
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (10,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    369,575
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,694,402
<PP&E>                                       1,647,125
<DEPRECIATION>                               (723,747)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,570,220
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          640,295
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    10,774,079
<OTHER-SE>                                 (7,169,700)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,570,220
<SALES>                                      3,269,651
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,269,651
<CGS>                                        1,964,784
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,964,784
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,178,738
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              35,981
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,777,507)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    51,080
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,828,587)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,828,587)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.54)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.54)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-39845) of
Planet Polymer Technologies, Inc. of our report dated March 2, 1999 appearing on
page F-2 of the Appendix to this Form 10-KSB. We also consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No.
333-1042) of Planet Polymer Technologies, Inc. of such report.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Diego, California
March 5, 1999
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

February 24, 2016

No. 15

- 2425

ANA MARILU RODRIGUEZ SUTUC; Y. L.R.,

Petitioners

v.

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE

UNITED STATES OF AMER ICA,

Respondent

( Agency No s

. A206

- 448

- 275 & A206

- 448

- 276 )

Present: JORDAN, VANASKIE and SHWARTZ

, Circuit Judges

1. Motion by Petitioners to Vacate Court’s Opinion Dated February 11, 2 016 ;

2. Response by Respondent’s in Non

- Opposition to the Motion

Respectfully,

Clerk/cjg

____________________ _____________ORDER________________________________

The Court has been advised that the BIA granted a motion to reopen the fina l

order of removal that was the subject of the petition for review filed in this case. Neither

Petitioners nor the Government informed the Court that such a motion was filed until

after the BIA granted it. As a result, this Court considered and ruled up on a petition to

review an order that had been reopened and thus was no longer a final order of removal.

Because the order this Court reviewed was not a final order of removal as of the date our

February 11, 2016 opinion and judgment was entered, the Cour t grants the unopposed

motion to vacate the February 11, 2016 Opinion and Judgment. The Court reminds the

parties of their continuing obligation in all cases to notify the Court of events that may

impact this Court's jurisdiction.

By the Court,

s/ Patty Shwartz

Dated : March 4, 2016 Circuit Judge

CJG/cc: Bernard A. Joseph, Esq.

Bridget Cambria, Esq.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5274

Arrowhead Electrical Products, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
exv10w4w1





Exhibit
10.4.1


ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY

EMPLOYEE SEVERANCE PROTECTION PLAN

(As Amended and Restated Effective May 6, 2008)




First Amendment




          Encore Acquisition Company, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), having reserved the right
under Section 9 of the Encore Acquisition Company Employee Severance Protection Plan, as amended
and restated May 6, 2008 (the “Plan”) to amend the Plan, does hereby amend the Plan as set forth
below.



          1. Section 3(b) of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following new sentence to the end
thereof:




“Notwithstanding the foregoing, for so long as Chris Rimkus is a Participant in the
Plan, he shall be a Level 1 Participant.”



          2. Section 4(a)(II)(iv)(A)(1) of the Plan is hereby amended to read as follows:




	 	“(1)	 	 a lump-sum cash payment equal to the product of two (2) (or, in the
case of (y) the CEO, two and one-half (21/2), or (z) Brad Gale or Kevin Treadway,
for so long as such individuals are Participants, three (3)) multiplied by the
sum of the Participant’s then annual base salary plus the amount of any cash
bonus under the Company’s annual incentive bonus plan earned by the Participant
with respect to the most recently completed fiscal year of the Company (or, if
the Participant became employed after the most recent fiscal year-end prior to
a termination covered under this Section 4, the target annual cash bonus for
such Participant as determined by the Company); and”





          3. The remainder of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.



          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed effective as of September 29, 2009.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Jon S. Brumley
 	 
	 	 	Jon S. Brumley 	 
	 	 	President and Chief Executive Officer 	 
	 




1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6853

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CALVIN SCOTT WEDINGTON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (CR82-86; CA-04-783-RDB) Submitted: September 16, 2004 Decided: September 22, 2004 Before LUTTIG, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Calvin Scott Wedington, Appellant Pro Se. Maury S. Epner, MILLER, MILLER & CANBY, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Calvin Scott Wedington seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion as successive. An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district court absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find both that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Wedington has not made the requisite showing. To the extent that Wedington’s informal brief and notice of appeal could be construed as a motion for authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion, we deny such authorization. SeeUnited States v. Winestock , 340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 124 S. Ct. 496 (2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4971 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4971

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide that agencies may not 
 deduct labor organization dues from the pay of Federal employees, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 2023

    Mr. Burlison (for himself, Mrs. Miller of Illinois, Mr. Good of 
  Virginia, Mr. Ogles, Mr. Tiffany, and Mr. Grothman) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                             Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide that agencies may not 
 deduct labor organization dues from the pay of Federal employees, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Paycheck Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. LABOR ORGANIZATION DUES NOT DEDUCTIBLE FROM PAY.

    (a) Federal Agencies.--
            (1) In general.--Section 7115 of title 5, United States 
        Code, is amended to read as follows:
``Sec. 7115. Labor organization dues: not deductible from pay
    ``An agency may not deduct any amount from the pay of an employee 
for labor organization dues, fees, or political contributions.''.
            (2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections at the 
        beginning of chapter 71 of title 5, United States Code, is 
        amended by striking the item relating to section 7115 and 
        inserting the following:

``7115. Labor organization dues: not deductible from pay.''.
    (b) Postal Service.--
            (1) In general.--Section 1205 of title 39, United States 
        Code, is amended to read as follows:
``Sec. 1205. Labor organization dues: not deductible from pay
    ``The Postal Service may not deduct any amount from the pay of an 
employee for labor organization dues, fees, or political 
contributions.''.
            (2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections at the 
        beginning of chapter 12 of title 39, United States Code, is 
        amended by striking the item relating to section 1205 and 
        inserting the following:

``1205. Labor organization dues: not deductible from pay.''.
                                 <all>
```