alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Carolyn E. O’Connor

, ) ) Plaintiff, ) )

v. ) Civil Action No. 20

- 547 (UNA) ) ) S.O.M.E

. , et. al

., ) ) Defendant s

. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on its initial review of the plaintiff’s pro se complaint and

application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis

. The Court will grant the plaintiff’s application

and dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdi ction.

The subject matter jurisdiction of the federal district courts is limited and is set forth

generally at 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1332. Under those statutes, federal jurisdiction is available

only when a “ federal question ” is presented or the parties are of diverse citizenship and the amount

in controversy exceeds $75,000. A party seeking relief in the district court must at least plead facts

that bring the suit within the court’ s jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). Failure to plead such

facts w arrants dismissal of the action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3).

The p laintiff , who resides in housing provided by S.O.M.E., a non

- profit organization in

the Distric t of Columbia, is “complaining of discrimination, personal injury and monetary loss,

due primarily to negligence and intentional acts . . . with regard to Plaintiff’s complaints” about

her living conditions

. Compl. at 1. The p laintiff alleges that

, as “a Caucasian, aged female,” she

is “an extreme minority ” who “is being harassed [and bullied] by the Black

- American tenants”

and “by management” in the building where she lives , yet the defendants have ignored or otherwise2

failed to respond to her concerns. See id . at 1

- 2

. Id

. Further, it appears that she may face eviction

for her alleged violations of the terms of her lease. See id . at 2. The p laintiff demands $ 4 00 million

in compensatory damages and $ 4 00 million in punitive damages. Id . at 2

.
The plaintiff has n either identified the basis of federal jurisdiction nor alleged sufficient

facts to state a federal claim against the private defendants. In addition, the complaint does not

allege any facts about the parties’ citizenship for the purpose of determining wh ether the Court has

diversity jurisdiction

. See Freeport

- McMoRan, Inc. v. K N Energy, Inc. , 498 U.S. 426, 428 (1991)

(it is a “well

- established rule” that in order for an action to proceed in diversity, the citizenship

requirement must be “ assesse d at the time the suit is filed”). Therefore, this case will be dismissed

.
A separate order of dismissal accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

/s/ AMY BERMAN JACKSON Date: April 7, 2020 United States District Judge
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 40640 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
JULIO CESAR MARTINEZ

- NAVARRO , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:14

- CR

- 278

- 1

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Julio Cesar Martinez

- Navarro has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Martinez

- Navarro h a s n ot filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 2 1 , 2015 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-40640 Document: 00513013514 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/21/2015No. 14

- 40640
presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for l eave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 14-40640 Document: 00513013514 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/21/2015
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2




                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT




The Board of Directors
General Growth Properties, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-11067, 333-15907, 333-17021, 333-23035, 333-37247, 333-37383,
333-41603, 333-58045, 333-68505, 333-76379, 333-76757, 333-82134, 333-82569,
333-84419, 333-88813, 333-88819 and 333-91621) on Form S-3 and the registration
statements (Nos. 33-79372, 333-07241, 333-11237, 333-28449, 333-74461 and
333-79737) on Form S-8 of General Growth Properties, Inc. of our report dated
January 31, 2003, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of GGP/Homart,
Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related
consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, stockholders' equity
and cash flows for the years then ended, and our report dated January 31, 2003,
with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of GGP/Homart II L.L.C. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated
statements of income and comprehensive income, members' capital and cash flows
for the years then ended, which reports appear in the December 31, 2002 annual
report on Form 10-K of General Growth Properties, Inc.

Our reports refer to a change in the method of accounting for intangible assets
in 2002 and a change in the method of accounting for derivative instruments and
hedging activities in 2001.


KPMG LLP


Chicago, Illinois
March 13, 2003
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Benny Curry, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People *(see, People v Ford,*66 NY2d 428, 437), we conclude that defendant’s conviction of robbery in the second degree *(see,*Penal Law § 160.10) is supported by legally sufficient evidence *(see, People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495).

We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Gorman, J.—robbery, second degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Denman, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of iVoice Technology, Inc. ("the
Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Mark
Meller, President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                       Date: August 14, 2006

                                       By /s/ Mark Meller
                                       ---------------------
                                       Mark Meller
                                       President, Chief Executive Officer and
                                       Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Conceptus, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

(i) the
accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the twelve months ended December 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 15, 2011



|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ MARK M. SIECZKAREK                                  
|Mark M. Sieczkarek President
and Chief Executive Officer
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-4618

ECM Industries LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4823

Arrowhead Electrical Products, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2538

Reelcraft Industries:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
ES Filed by Filing Services Canada Inc. 403-717-3898


 

AMENDMENT AGREEMENT










THIS AMENDMENT AGREEMENT is made on the 25th day of August, 2010







BETWEEN:




PLAY LA INC., with registered offices at Mossack Fonseca & Co., 

Akara Building, PO Box 3136, 24 de Castro Street, Wickhams

Cay 1, Road Town, Tortola, BVI




(hereinafter referred to as the “Purchaser”)




OF THE FIRST PART

AND:




Paul Sandells, Businessman, of 7 Douglas Bader Close,

Lutterworth, Leicestershire, United Kingdom  LE17 5RX




(hereinafter referred to as the “Vendor”)

OF THE SECOND PART




WHEREAS:




A.

The Purchaser and the Vendor entered into an Agreement dated January 18th, 2010 whereby the Vendor has agreed to sell the Poker News Headlines Undertaking to the Purchaser; and

B.

The Purchaser and the Vendor hereby wish to amend certain terms of the Agreement dated January 18th, 2010;

C.

The Purchaser and the Vendor mutually agree to amend the Purchase Price to the sum of USD $7,500.




NOW THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows:




1.

The Purchase Price means the sum of USD $7,500. (Seven Thousand Five Hundred Dollars)




2.

The Vendor hereby sells and assigns to the Purchaser and the Purchaser hereby purchases from the Vendor the Headlines Undertaking for the Purchase Price, as the same is required to be adjusted under this Agreement and allocated as follows: 




			
	Domain and development

	$

	1,000


	Website content

	 
	4,000


	Website forum and subscribers

	 
	1,000


	Goodwill

	 
	1,500


	 
	$

	7,500


	 
	 
	 



3.

The Vendor agrees to return the original share certificate number 227 in the amount of 58,824 common shares of Play LA Inc. upon execution of this Amendment Agreement to the Purchaser for cancellation.












4.

The Purchaser agrees to pay the Vendor USD $7,500 by wire transfer payment, directly to the Vendors Bank coordinates, for the Headlines Undertaking, in full, within 2 business days of receipt of cancellation notice and original share certificate.




5.

The payment of $7,500 USD will be full and final payment in regards to the Agreement dated January 18, 2010, and for any and all related matters connected with said Agreement.







IN WITNESS HEREOF, the Purchaser and the Vendor have executed this Amendment Agreement as of the date first mentioned above.










EXECUTED by Play LA Inc. in the presence of:




_/s/___Maribel__________________________

_/s/ David Hallonquist____________________

Signature

DAVID HALLLONQUIST




__Maribel Jordan_______________________

Print Name




____________________________________

Occupation













SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED in the presence of:




___/s/ K Sandells  ______________________

__/s/ P Sandellls______________________

Signature

PAUL SANDELLS




___K Sandells                       ________________

Print Name




___Teacher ___________________________

Occupation
Exhibit 99.1





Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BlackRock, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ending
June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Laurence D. Fink, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Paul L. Audet, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/    LAURENCE D. FINK


---

Name: Laurence D. Fink


Title: Chief Executive Officer


Date: August 13, 2002








/s/    PAUL L. AUDET


---

Name: Paul L. Audet


Title: Chief Financial
Officer


Date: August 13, 2002
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5037 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5037

 To amend the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, to repeal certain 
 limits on leave for married individuals employed by the same employer.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 2023

Ms. Porter (for herself, Mrs. Hinson, Ms. Stevens, Mr. Fitzpatrick, Mr. 
Connolly, Mr. Allred, Mr. Lynch, Mr. Nadler, Mr. Beyer, Ms. Norton, Mr. 
 Pocan, Mr. Moulton, Ms. Lee of California, Mr. Cohen, and Ms. Kuster) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
Education and the Workforce, and in addition to the Committees on House 
 Administration, and Oversight and Accountability, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, to repeal certain 
 limits on leave for married individuals employed by the same employer.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fair Access for Individuals to 
Receive Leave Act'' or the ``FAIR Leave Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF CERTAIN TIME LIMITATIONS ON LEAVE FOR SPOUSES.

    Section 102(f) of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (29 
U.S.C. 2612(f)) is repealed.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Killbuck Bancshares, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Luther E. Proper, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                     
|----------------------- |  | --------------------
|By:                     |  | /s/ Luther E. Proper
|Luther E. Proper       
|Chief Executive Officer
|August 11, 2008        

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Killbuck Bancshares,
Inc. and will be retained by Killbuck Bancshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4976

Apergy ESP Systems, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel