alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Ren J. THOMPSON, Defendant/Appellant. Ren James THOMPSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Defendant/Respondent.

Nos. 65735, 69024.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

Oct. 1, 1996.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Nov. 18,1996.

Wittner, Poger, Rosenblum & Spewak, N. Scott Rosenblum, Ramona L. Marten, St. Louis, for defendant/appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., David R. Truman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiffirespondent.

Before CRAHAN, P.J., and GRIMM and HOFF, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

A jury convicted defendant of first degree burglary, § 569.160, RSMo 1994, second degree assault, § 565.060, RSMo 1994, kidnapping, § 565.110, RSMo 1994, and rape, § 566.030, RSMo 1992. The trial court sentenced him to fifteen years for rape and six years for burglary, consecutively. It also imposed concurrent sentences of seven years for assault and six years for kidnapping.

Defendant filed a Rule 29.15 motion, which the trial court denied. On appeal, he l’aises seven points.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgments are affirmed pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4846

Scosche Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 66 (Thursday, April 6, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 17572]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8420]



[[Page 17572]]


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Manzanar National Historic Site Advisory Commission; Notice of 
Meeting

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act that a meeting of the Manzanar National Historic Site 
Advisory Commission will be held at 1:00 p.m. (PST) on Friday, April 
28, 1995 at the County of Inyo Administrative Center, Board of 
Supervisors' Chambers, 224 N. Edwards Street (U.S. Highway 395), 
Independence, California to hear presentations on issues related to the 
planning, development, and management of Manzanar National Historic 
Site.
    The Advisory Commission was established by Public Law 102-248, to 
meet and consult with the Secretary of the Interior or his designee, 
with respect to the development, management, and interpretation of the 
site, including the preparation of a general management plan for the 
Manzanar National Historic Site.
    Members of the Commission are as follows:

Mr. William Michael, Acting Chairperson
Mr. Ronald Izumita
Ms. Sue Embrey
Mr. Mas Okui
Mr. Keith Bright
Mr. Glenn Singley
Mr. Richard Stewart
Mr. Vernon Miller
Mr. Gann Matsuda
Ms. Rose Ochi
Ms. Martha Davis

    The main agenda items at this initial meeting of the Commission 
will include the following:

(1) Review of the provisions of the charter establishing the 
Commission.
(2) Designation by the members of the Commission of a Chairperson.
(3) Status report on the development of Manzanar National Historic Site 
by Superintendent Ross R. Hopkins.
(4) Review of the draft park General Management Plan.
(5) General discussion of miscellaneous matters pertaining to future 
Commission activities and Manzanar National Historic Site development 
issues.

    This meeting is open to the public. It will be recorded for 
documentation, and transcribed for dissemination. Minutes of the 
meeting will be available to the public after approval of the full 
Commission. A transcript will be available after May 30, 1995. For a 
copy of the minutes contact the Superintendent, Manzanar National 
Historic Site, P.O. Box 426, Independence, California 93526.

    Dated: March 24, 1995.
Ross R. Hopkins,
Superintendent, Manzanar National Park.
[FR Doc. 95-8420 Filed 4-5-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
Organization Name:

Note: Representatives submitting on behalf of an organization must enter information below.

Requestor Representative:

Section 301 Investigation: China's Acts, Policies, and Practices Related to Technology 

Transfer, Intellectual Property, and Innovation - Form to Request Exclusion of Product

When submitting a product exclusion request using this form, enter the specified 

information in the following fields and explain the basis and rationale for your statements. 

By completing this form, you certify that the information provided is complete and 

correct to the best of your knowledge. 

1. Indicate whether the comment contains business confidential information (BCI), is a public

document, or is a public version of a BCI document.

3.

2. Please provide a complete and detailed description of the product of concern:

4.

5. Requestor's relationship to the product:

CONTINUED BELOW

*

10-digit HTSUS item number* for product you wish to address in this product exclusion request:

Use numerical characters only with no special characters (example: 1023456789). For help in finding 

the HTSUS item number associated with your product, see https://hts.usitc.gov/

1

7.

6. Does this submission in regulations.gov include additional attachments?

Please indicate whether any additional attachment contains business confidential

information (BCI), is a public document, or is a public version of a BCI document.

VERSION 1

Requestor Information

Requestor Name (Last, First):

Public Version of BCI

RC251, 25.8 ton Capacity, 1.00 in Stroke, General Purpose Hydraulic Cylinder; Maximum Operating 

Pressure psi: 10000; Weight Kgs: 5,9; Oil Capacity Advance cm3: 86; Stroke Ranges mm: 24 - 47

8412210075 Schmidt, Jackie Enerpac Jackie SchmidtImporter Yes Contains BCI
END 2

8. Is this product, or a comparable product, available from sources in the United States?:

VERSION 1

11. Please provide information in support your request, taking account of the instructions

provided in Section B of the Federal Register notice (note: text entered below can extend

beyond the apparent size of this box).

9. Is this product, or a comparable product, available from sources in third countries?:

10. Please provide the value and quantity (with units) of the Chinese-origin product of concern

that you purchased for each calendar year specified. Limit this figure to the products

purchased by your firm (or by members of your trade association) alone. Please provide 

estimates if precise figures are unavailable.

2016 Value:

2015 Value:

2017 Value:

2016 Quantity:

2015 Quantity:

2017 Quantity:

No No BCI BCI BCI BCI BCI BCI

See addendum for additional information.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5202

United Scope LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_05.09.19.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of Universal FogInc. for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2005, I, Tom Bontems,  Chief ExecutiveOfficer and Chief Financial  Officer of Universal Fog Inc.  hereby certify pursuantto  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  theSarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  to the best of my  knowledge  and  belief,  that:

 
| 1.     | Such  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  September 30, 2005,fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and                                              |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
| 2.     | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the periodended  September  30,  2005,  fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  thefinancial  condition and results of  operations  of Universal Fog Inc. |

 
| By:    | */s/*   *Tom Bontems*

Tom BontemsChief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer |
|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                  | * *                                                                                                  |

 
| Dated: | November 3, 2005 |
|--------|------------------|
exhibit10_101.htm




 


March 23, 2010












Citibank, N.A.


750 Washington Boulevard (8th Floor)


Stamford, CT 06901-3702


Attention: Gina Losito


gina.losito@citi.com







Ladies and Gentlemen:







This letter shall constitute notice pursuant to Section 2.4(a) of the Amended & Restated Omnibus Credit Agreement, dated as of January 29, 2010 (as amended by Amendment No.1 dated as of February 11, 2010, and as the same may be further amended, supplemented, restated or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Agreement”), by and among (i) The Student Loan Corporation, as borrower, (ii) Citibank, N.A., as lender, (iii) Citibank, N.A., not in its individual capacity but solely in its separate capacity as the Trustee under the Trust Agreement referred to in the Agreement, solely for purposes of the sections of the Agreement specified therein, and (iv) the Non-Securitization Subsidiaries that become parties to the Agreement from time to time pursuant to Joinder Agreements, that the Commitment with respect to Private Loan Funding shall be reduced to $3,000,000,000 effective as of  March 24, 2010.


 


Capitalized terms used and not defined herein have the meanings set forth or incorporated by reference in the Agreement.


 


 




	THE STUDENT LOAN CORPORATION
	 	 
	
By: 

	/s/ Joseph P. Guage
	 	Name: Joseph P. Guage
	 	Title:  Chief Financial Officer
	 	 

















cc:           Citibank, N.A.


750 Washington Boulevard (8th Floor)


Stamford, CT 06901-3702


Attention: Bob Kohl


robert.kohl@citi.com







Citibank, N.A.


750 Washington Boulevard (8th Floor)


Stamford, CT 06901-3702


Attention: Madelyn Arroyo


madelyn.arroyo@citi.com







Citibank, N.A.


388 Greenwich Street, 14th Floor


New York, NY 10013


Attention: SLC Trust – Credit Agreement
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5022

Enerpac:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-5694

Radio Systems Corp: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6259

CW Bearing USA, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-40250

Summary Calendar

WILLIAM P. MAHER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Texas

(C-95-CV-406)

August 8, 1997

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, WIENER and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

POLITZ, Chief Judge: *

William P. Maher, a pro se litigant, appeals an adverse summary judgment

in his employment discrimination complaint against the Texas Department of

Transportation. For the reasons assigned we vacate and remand.1 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(1).

2 29 U.S.C. § 626(e).

3 Martin v. Demma , 831 F.2d 69, 71 (5th Cir. 1987) (per curiam).

4 Ynclan v. Department of the Air Force , 943 F.2d 1388 (5th Cir. 1991); Hernandez

v. Aldridge , 902 F.2d 386 (5th Cir. 1990); Martin

.

2 The district court concluded that Maher failed to file a complaint within 90

days of receiving an EEOC right to sue letter, as required by Title VII of the Civil

Rights Act of 1964 1 and the Age Discrimination in Emplo yment Act. 2 Maher

received a right to sue letter on March 30 , 1995. On June 14, 1995 he filed an

application to proceed in forma pauperis

, simultaneously submitting to the clerk of

the district court his complaint alleging discrimination on the basis of sex, age, and

national origin. The pleading was stamped that date as “Received.” On August 11,

1995 the request for IFP was granted and the complaint was stamped “filed.”

The distr i ct court apparently considered Maher’s complaint as filed on

August 11. We have observed that “[c]lerical delay in the formal filing of [an] i n

forma pauperis complaint should not affect the operative event, that is, the receipt

of the complaint by the court.” 3 In cases with similar facts, we have concluded that

e quity cannot permit a plaintiff to be prejudiced by the administrative delay

inherent in the nature of such suits. 4

In the instant case, the district court denied defendant’s Rule 12(b)(6) motion3

to dismiss during a status conference on May 31, 1996. The court’s notes from the

conference reflect that Maher’s “complaint was timely filed” and that Maher was

ordered “to re-file a complaint more clearly stating his allegations” within 10 days.

Based on the record before us we cannot determine why t he district court later

concluded that the complaint was not timely despite its submission on the day the

IFP application was filed, well within the requisite 90 days from receipt of the right

to sue letter.

We therefore VACATE the order of the district court and R EMAND for a

reexamination to determine whether Maher’s complaint was submitted to the clerk

for filing within the sta tutory time period. Maher’s motion to supplement the

record on appeal is DENIED as moot.
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT 21.1
                          Subsidiaries of the Company

Subsidiary's                            Jurisdiction of
Corporate Name                          Incorporation
--------------                          -------------

DHS Management Services, Inc.           Texas

Mobile Diagnostic Systems, Inc.         Texas

Heart Institute of Tulsa, Inc.          Oklahoma

Specialized Imaging Services Inc.       Illinois

Alpha Scanning Service, Inc.            Louisiana

Diagnostic Health Services
de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.                 Mexico

HomeCare International, Inc.            Texas

Mobile Diagnostic Imaging, Inc.         Delaware

St. Louis Mobile Ultrasound, Inc.       Delaware

HDI Acquisition Corp.                   Texas

Advanced Diagnostic Imaging, Inc.       Texas

Pediatric Echocardiographic
Diagnostic Imaging, Inc.                Texas

Ultrasound Diagnostic Services, Ltd.    Arizona

SoCal Diagnostic Services, Inc.         California

SoCal Subsidiary I, Inc.                California

SoCal Subsidiary II, Inc.               California

Santa Monica Imaging Center,
Limited Partnership                     California (limited partnership)
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 69 (Tuesday, April 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 18396]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8774]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Intelligence Agency, Scientific Advisory Board Panel 
Closed Meeting

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Intelligence Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of Subsection (d) of Section 10 of 
Public Law 92-463, as amended by Section 5 of Public Law 94-409, notice 
is hereby given that a closed meeting of the DIA Scientific Advisory 
Board has been scheduled as follows:

DATE: .April 18-19, 1995 (830-400).

ADDRESS: The Defense Intelligence Agency, Bolling AFB, Washington, DC 
20340-5100.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dr. W.S. Williamson, Executive Secretary, DIA Scientific Advisory 
Board, Washington, DC 20340-1328 (202) 373-4930.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The entire meeting is devoted to the 
discussion of classified information as defined in Section 552b(c)(I), 
Title 5 of the U.S. Code and therefore will be closed to the public. 
The Board will receive briefings on and discuss several current 
critical intelligence issues and advise the Director, DIA, on related 
scientific and technical matters.

    Dated: April 5, 1995.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 95-8774 Filed 4-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M