alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 3(i)(B)

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST
                                       OF
                        RIDGEWOOD ELECTRIC POWER TRUST II

The undersigned certifies that:

1.      The name of the statutory trust is Ridgewood Electric Power Trust II
(the "Statutory Trust").

2.      The amendment to the Certificate of Trust of the Statutory Trust set
forth below (the "Amendment") has been duly authorized by the Managing
Shareholder of the Statutory Trust.

            The second paragraph of the Certificate of Trust is hereby amended
to read as follows:

            "2. The name and business address of the Corporate Trustee of the
Trust in the State of Delaware is Christiana Bank & Trust Company, 1314 King
Street, P.O. Box 957, Wilmington, DE 19899-0957, Attention: Corporate Trust
Administration,"

3.      Pursuant to Title 12, 3801 et. al., the Delaware Statutory Trust Act,
(the "Act'), this Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Trust of the
Statutory Trust shall become effective immediately upon fling with the Office of
the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.

4.      The Amendment is made pursuant to the authority granted by the Statutory
Trust under Section 3810(b) of the Act and pursuant to the authority set forth
in the governing instrument of the Statutory Trust.

            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the Corporate Trustee of
the Statutory Trust, has duly executed this Certificate of Amendment this 18th
day of December, 2003.

                                        Christiana Bank & Trust Company,
                                        Corporate Trustee


                                        By: /s/ Toni L. Lindsay
                                            -----------------------------------
                                        Name: Toni L. Lindsay
                                        Title: Vice President



       State of Delaware
      Secretary of State
   Division of Corporations
 Delivered 02:16 PM 12/18/2003
   FILED 02:16 PM 12/18/2003
  SRV 030805634 - 2316790 FILE
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JOHN FINLEY WALKER,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-17-00133-CR

Appeal from

394th District Court

of Brewster County, Texas

(TC # 4397)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified 

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 7TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2019.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3440

Scosche Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
exv10w1







Exhibit 10.1




RED LION HOTELS CORPORATION




SUMMARY OF TERMS OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT



OF



JON E. ELIASSEN



	 	 	 

	Title:

	 	Interim President and Chief Executive Officer
	 
	 	 
	Term:

	 	At will
	 
	 	 
	Salary:

	 	$360,000 per year. Mr. Eliassen is separately compensated for service as a director on the same basis and under the
same terms and conditions as the Company’s non-employee directors.
	 
	 	 
	Bonus:

	 	Mr. Eliassen is not eligible to participate in the Company’s Executive Officers Variable Pay Plan.
	 
	 	 
	Benefits:

	 	Mr. Eliassen is eligible to participate in all benefit programs generally available to employees of the Company,
subject to applicable waiting periods and other conditions to participation.
#### Henry Morrison, Plaintiff, v. Richard R. Watson, Defendant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on opinion of

Barret, J.
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Multimedia Games, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gordon
T. Graves, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Gordon T. Graves
---------------------
Gordon T. Graves
Chief Executive Officer

December 20, 2002
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 4, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 524]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-80]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Interagency Committee on Aircraft Noise Meeting Agenda

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of public forum.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a forum 
sponsored by the Federal Interagency Committee on Aircraft Noise 
(FICAN) to discuss aircraft noise issues.

DATES: The forum will be held on March 2, 1995.

ADDRESS: The forum will be held at Reserve Auditorium, Naval Air 
Station Miramar, San Diego, CA.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Thomas Connor, Manager, Technology Division (AEE-100), Office of 
Environment and Energy, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 
Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20591, fax (202) 267-5594.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given of a public forum 
sponsored by the Federal Interagency Committee on Aircraft Noise 
(FICAN) to be held on March 2, 1995.
    On March 16, 1993, representatives of the agencies that 
participated on the Federal Interagency Committee on Noise (FICON) met 
and agreed to establish a standing committee to be known as FICAN. The 
standing interagency committee will provide a permanent aviation noise 
research and development (R&D) forum, which will assist agencies in 
providing adequate forums for discussion of public and private 
proposals, identify needed research, and encouraging R&D efforts in 
these areas. FICAN held their first public forum on July 27, 1994 in 
Atlanta GA. The public forum consisted of presentations by the FICAN 
members on current and future aircraft noise research projects, 
followed by an open comment and discussion period.
    The agenda for the meeting will include:
    <bullet> Presentation of current and future aircraft noise research 
projects that are funded by the Federal members of FICAN.
    <bullet> Public concern/discussion and comment period.
    Attendance is open to the public, but will be limited to the space 
available. The public must make arrangements by February 17, 1995 to 
present oral statements at the forum. Arrangements may be made by 
contacting the person listed under the heading for further information 
contact. Sign and oral interpretation can be made available at the 
meeting, as well as an assistive listening device, if requested 10 
calendar days before the forum. Written comments should be addressed to 
the person listed under the heading for further information contact. 
Comments must be received on or before March 6, 1995.
Thomas Connor,
Manager, Technology Division, Office of Environment and Energy.
[FR Doc. 95-80 Filed 1-3-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3107

OSRAM Opto Semiconductors, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China. 

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Broadwing Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), each of the undersigned, hereby certifies as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of
the United States Code, that to his knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                       |  |  |  |                       |  |        |  |                                                             
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------- |  | ------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 7, 2006 |  |  |  | Broadwing Corporation
|                       |  |  |  |                      
|                       |  |  |  |                       |  |        |  | /S/    STEPHEN E.
COURTER                                   
|                       |  |  |  |                       |  | Name:  |  | Stephen E. Courter                                          
|                       |  |  |  |                       |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer                                     
|                       |  |  |  |                      
|                       |  |  |  |                       |  |        |  | /S/    LYNN D.
ANDERSON                                     
|                       |  |  |  |                       |  | Name:  |  | Lynn D. Anderson                                            
|                       |  |  |  |                       |  | Title: |  | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
POWER OF ATTORNEY

         KNOW ALL  PERSONS BY THESE  PRESENTS,  that the  undersigned,  Ralph O.
Hellmold,  appoints Robert E. Swanson and Martin V. Quinn,  and each of them, as
his true and lawful  attorneys-in-fact  with full power to act and do all things
necessary,  advisable or  appropriate,  in their  discretion,  to execute on his
behalf as an  Independent  Trustee of Ridgewood  Electric  Power Trust II and of
Ridgewood Electric Power Trust III, the Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1998 for each of the above-named  trusts,  and all amendments
or documents relating thereto.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney
this 27th day of March, 1999, at Naples, Florida.

                                                    /s/Ralph O. Hellmold
      Ralph O. Hellmold

<PAGE>
POWER OF ATTORNEY

         KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS,  that the undersigned,  Jonathan C.
Kaledin,  appoints  Robert E. Swanson and Martin V. Quinn,  and each of them, as
his true and lawful  attorneys-in-fact  with full power to act and do all things
necessary,  advisable or  appropriate,  in their  discretion,  to execute on his
behalf as an  Independent  Trustee of Ridgewood  Electric  Power Trust II and of
Ridgewood Electric Power Trust III, the Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1998 for each of the above-named  trusts,  and all amendments
or documents relating thereto.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney
this 27th day of March, 1999, atNaples, Florida.

                             /s/Jonathan C. Kaledin
Jonathan C. Kaledin
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 26, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-5020

Goodman Manufacturing Company, L.P.: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September_2019.pdf. 

An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the exclusion notice. The scope of the exclusion is governed by the scope of the 10-digit HTSUS 

subheadings and product descriptions in the annex to the product exclusion notice, and not by the 

product descriptions set out in any particular request for exclusion. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Tony FITZPATRICK, Appellant. Tony FITZPATRICK, Appellant. v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 65635.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

May 7, 1996.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied June 17, 1996.

Application to Transfer Denied Aug. 20, 1996.

John M. Schilmoeller, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for Appellant.

*62Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty., Gen., Becky Owenson Kilpatrick, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for Respondent.

Before AHRENS, P.J., SIMON and PUDLOWSKI, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Tony Fitzpatrick, following a jury verdict, appeals from his sentences for incest, § 568.020 RSMo.1994, forcible sodomy, § 566.060, and endangering the welfare of a child, § 568.045, in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis. This appeal is also consolidated with an appeal from the denial of appellant’s motion to vacate judgment and sentence under Rule 29.15. The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b). The denial of post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 63 (Monday, April 3, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 16863]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8056]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

CNO Executive Panel; Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 
U.S.C. App. 2), notice is hereby given that the Chief of Naval 
Operations (CNO) Executive Panel will meet April 27-28, 1995, from 9:00 
a.m. to 4:00 p.m., on each day at 4401 Ford Avenue, Alexandria, 
Virginia. These sessions will be closed to the public.

    The purpose of this meeting is to conduct policy discussions to 
prepare a final briefing on naval warfare innovations in the areas of 
joint operations, information warfare, naval doctrine, and research and 
development. These matters constitute classified information that is 
specifically authorized by Executive order to be kept secret in the 
interest of national defense and are, in fact, properly classified 
pursuant to such Executive order. Accordingly, the Secretary of the 
Navy has determined in writing that the public interest requires that 
all sessions of the meeting be closed to the public because they will 
be concerned with matters listed in section 552b(c)(1) of title 5, 
United States Code.

    For further information concerning this meeting, contact: Timothy 
J. Galpin, Assistant for CNO Executive Panel Management, 4401 Ford 
Avenue, Suite 601, Alexandria, VA 22302-0268, Phone: (703) 756-1205.

    Dated: March 28, 1995
L.R. McNees,
LCDR, JAGC, USN, Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-8056 Filed 3-31-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-F
(June 14, 1990)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Steven Kowalczyk, Appellant.

Casey, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Harrigan, J.), rendered March 27, 1987, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree.

The only issue raised on this appeal is whether the term "dangerous knife” contained in Penal Law § 265.01 (2) is so vague and indefinite as to render unconstitutional the statute under which defendant was indicted (Penal Law § 265.02 [1]). *753According to defendant’s argument, the Legislature’s use of the modifier "dangerous” indicates that not all knives are subject to the statutory proscription and, in the absence of a specific definition of "dangerous knife” in the Penal Law, it cannot be determined with any degree of certainty what conduct is prohibited by the statute. In *Matter of Jamie D.*(59 NY2d 589), the Court of Appeals concluded that whether a knife comes within the scope of the statute can be determined on the basis of at least three alternative considerations: one, its own characteristics which show that it is primarily intended for use as a weapon; second, a modification which converts what would otherwise be a utensil into a weapon; and third, the circumstances of the possession which reveal that the possessor considers it a weapon and not an innocent utilitarian utensil *(see, supra,*at 592, 594). In light of this construction of the statute, defendant’s argument must be rejected.

Judgment affirmed. Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Weiss, Mercure and Harvey, JJ., concur.
#### Melvin SANSOCIE, Employee/Appellant, v. LACLEDE GAS COMPANY, Employer/Respondent, and Treasurer of Missouri as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Respondent.

No. 69202.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.

Aug. 13, 1996.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 1,1996.

Michael A. Gross, St. Louis, for appellant.

Robert W. Haeckel; Evans & Dixon, St. Louis, for employer/respondent.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Beverly E. Temple, Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Louis, for Second Injury Fund.

Before CRANE, C.J., AHRENS, J., and WILLIAM E. TURNAGE, Senior Judge.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

In this workers’ compensation case, Melvin Sansoeie appeals from an award of the Labor Industrial Relations Commission granting Mr. Sansoeie permanent partial disability and temporary total disability benefits. Mr. Sansoeie asserts error in: (a) the Commission’s finding that no causal relationship existed between Mr. Sansocie’s work-related injury and his subsequent development of angina and hypertension; (b) the Commission’s finding that Mr. Sansoeie was not permanently and totally disabled; and (c) the failure of the Commission to award temporary total disability benefits for the period of July 25,1990 to August 1,1991.

We have reviewed the record and find the Commission’s award was supported by substantial and competent evidence and was not contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence. *Strate v. Al Baker’s Restaurant,*864 S.W.2d 417, 419 (Mo.App.1993). A written opinion would have no precedential value and would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information explaining the reasons for this order. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).