alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4131

Tianhai Electric North America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
AMENDMENT TO MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING


AMENDMENT TO MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

WHEREAS, on January 25, 2011, GLOBAL EARTH ENERGY, INC., a Nevada corporation (“Global Earth Energy”) and LB TIM CO., LTD., a South Korean corporation (“LBT”) executed that certain Memorandum of Understanding (the “MOU”), a copy of which is attached hereto as Attachment A are incorporated herein by reference for all purposes; and

WHEREAS, due to the fact that Global Earth Energy has been delayed in closing the offering described in the MOU, Global Earth Energy and LBT desire to extend the time for the closing of the offering as described in the MOU;

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the following, the parties agree to extend the closing date of the offering as described in the MOU to December 31, 2011.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of June 30, 2011.

GLOBAL EARTH ENERGY, INC.







By

    Sydney A. Harland, Chief Executive Officer







LB TIM CO., LTD.







By

    Seung Joon Lim, President




Attachment:

Attachment A

Memorandum of Understanding






ATTACHMENT A

Memorandum of Understanding
#### COLUMBUS SQUARE TOWNHOME ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellant, v. Harriet HUBBARD, Respondent.

No. 68392.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

Aug. 13, 1996.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 1,1996.

Thomas G. Brackman, R. Kip Welbom, Copeland, Thompson & Farris, Clayton, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Trudi McCollum Foushee, Green and Foushee, St. Louis, for Respondent.

Before PUDLOWSKI, P.J., and SIMON and HOFF, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Columbus Square Townhome Association (Association), appeals the judgment denying its claim against Harriet Hubbard (Owner), to collect past due condominium assessments and to foreclose on Owner’s property. Owner does not appeal the judgment denying her counter-claim against Association for the cost of repair due to Association’s failure to maintain the exterior of her condominium, as well as for attorney’s fees.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find that no error of law appears. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum solely for the use of the parties involved has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

April 12, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3810

Alo Tennessee, Inc: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_04.15.19.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
* Pursuant to 5th CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the

limited circumstances set forth in 5th CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-11305

Summary Calendar

DAVID ARRON HERNANDEZ,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,

INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:97-CV-907-Y

January 7, 1999

Before JOHNSON, DUHE’, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

David Arron Hernandez, Texas prisoner # 646920, appeals from the

district court’s dismissal of his habeas corpus petition, filed pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Hernandez contends that the district court erred

in determining that the petition was barred under the one-year

limitations period of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). Specifically, he argues that

the petition should have been deemed filed on the date which a prior §

2254 petition, which was dismissed without prejudice for failure to

exhaust state remedies, was filed. 
2

We have reviewed the state and federal records and conclude that

the district court properly deemed Hernandez’s petition untimely, as it

was filed approximately two months after the jurisprudential grace

period and any applicable tolling periods had passed. See 28 U.S.C.

§2244(d)(1) & (d)(2); Flanagan v. Johnson, 154 F.3d 196, 201-02 (5th

Cir. 1998); Fields v. Johnson, 159 F.3d 914, 916 (5th Cir. 1998);

Lambert v. United States, 44 F.3d 296, 298 (5th Cir. 1996) (plaintiff’s

untimely second Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”) complaint was barred

by the statute of limitations where first, timely filed FTCA complaint

was dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative

remedies, because the first dismissal “left [the plaintiff] in the same

position as if the first suit had never been filed”).

AFFIRMED.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5011

OMRON Management Center of America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5356

Arrowhead Electrical Products, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
---

---

Exhibit 15.1

SCHEDULE OF VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
(U.S. dollars in thousands)

|                              | Balance at
beginning 
of period | Provision 
for doubtful 
accounts | Write-offs of 
previously
provided 
accounts | Translation
adjustments | Balance at 
end of period
|----------------------------- | ------------------------------- | --------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------- | ----------------------- | -------------------------
|
|
|
|
|Year ended December 31, 2006: |                                 |                                   |                                              |                         |                          
|Allowance for doubtful debts  |                                 |                                   | $                                            | 306                     |                          
|                              |                                 |                                  
|Year ended December 31, 2005: |                                 |                                  
|Allowance for doubtful debts  |                                 |                                   | $                                            | 320                     |                          
|                              |                                 |                                  
|Year ended December 31, 2004: |                                 |                                  
|Allowance for doubtful debts  |                                 |                                   | $                                            | 187                     |                          
|                              |                                 |                                   |                                              |                         |                          



---

---
---

---

Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report
of Magal Security System Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending
December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Raya Asher, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the           Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/Raya Asher*
Raya Asher
Chief Financial Officer

June 28, 2007

*     The originally executed copy of
this Certification will be maintained at the Companys offices and will be made
available for inspection upon request.



---

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
                                           Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Multimedia Games, Inc., on Form S-8 (File No. 333-23123) and Form S-3 (File Nos.
333-16729; 333-28367; and 333-36319) of our report dated December 4, 1998, on
our audits of the consolidated financial statements of Multimedia Games, Inc.
and subsidiaries as of September 30, 1998 and for each of the two years in the
period ended September 30, 1998, which report is included in this Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB.

COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

Tulsa, Oklahoma
December 23, 1998
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4690

Apergy ESP Systems, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3067

Ogura Corporation: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_05.09.19.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-4577

Zipline International Inc: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 8 (Thursday, January 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 3020]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-785]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 2147]


Shipping Coordinating Committee Maritime Safety Committee; Notice 
of Meeting

    The Shipping Coordinating Committee (SHC) will conduct an open 
meeting at 9:30 A.M. on Tuesday, January 31, 1995, in Room 2415, at 
U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters, 2100 Second Street, S.W., Washington, 
DC. The purpose of this meeting will be to report on the sixty-fourth 
session of the Marine Safety Committee (MSC) of the International 
Maritime Organization (IMO) held 5-9 December 1994. The U.S. delegation 
to MSC 64 will report on the activities of the session.
    Specific items will include:

a. Ro/Ro vessel safety
b. Bulk carrier safety
c. Role of the human element in maritime casualties
d. Existing ships' safety standards (grandfather clause)
e. Reports of various subcommittees (Stability, Load Lines and Fishing 
Vessel Safety; Life-Saving, Search and Rescue; Containers and Cargoes; 
Fire Protection; Training and Watchkeeping; Safety of Navigation; and 
Bulk Chemicals.)

    Members of the public may attend this meeting up to the seating 
capacity of the room. Interested persons may seek information by 
writing to Mr. Joseph J. Angelo, U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters (G-MI), 
2100 Second Street, S.W., Room 2408, Washington, DC 20593-0001 or by 
calling (202) 267-2970.

    Dated: December 29, 1994.
Charles A. Mast,
Chairman, Shipping Coordinating Committee.
[FR Doc. 95-785 Filed 1-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-07-M
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4946 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to eliminate the 190- 

day lifetime limit on inpatient psychiatric hospital services under the 

Medicare Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 26, 2023 

Mr. TONKO (for himself and Mr. HUIZENGA) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to eliminate 

the 190-day lifetime limit on inpatient psychiatric hospital services under the Medicare Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Mental 

5 Health Inpatient Equity Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF 190-DAY LIFETIME LIMIT ON INPA7 TIENT PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL SERVICES. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1812 of the Social Secu9 rity Act (42 U.S.C. 1395d) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4946 IH

1 (1) in subsection (b)— 

2 (A) in paragraph (1), by adding ‘‘or’’ at 

3 the end; 

4 (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘; or’’ at 

5 the end and inserting a period; and 

6 (C) by striking paragraph (3); and 

7 (2) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘(but shall not 

8 be included’’ and all that follows before the period 

9 at the end. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

11 subsection (a) shall apply to items and services furnished 

12 on or after January 1, 2025. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS