alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-5108

Nissan North America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 58 (Monday, March 27, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15750]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7456]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force


USAF Scientific Advisory Board Meeting

    The New World Vistas Information Applications Panel of the USAF 
Scientific Advisory Board will meet on 25-26 April 1995 at the Air 
Intelligence Agency, San Antonio, TX from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    The purpose of this meeting will be to provide information 
applications assessments on issues relating to New World Vistas.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with Section 
552b of Title 5, United States Code, specifically subparagraphs (1) and 
(4) thereof.
    For further information, contact the Scientific Advisory Board 
Secretariat at (703) 697-4648.
Patsy J. Conner,
Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-7456 Filed 3-24-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3910-01-P
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Universal Capital Management, Inc.
      (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 31, 2006 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, Michael D. Queen, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my
      knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.









/s/
      Michael D. Queen


Michael
      D. Queen


President
      (Principal Executive Officer)


March
      16,
      2006










The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and shall not be deemed
      filed
      by the Company for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act
      of
      1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to liability under that Section.
      This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into
      any
      filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act except to the extent
      that this certification is expressly incorporated by reference into any such
      filing.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5571

Seaboard International, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-16-00407-CV

____________________

JEREMIAH GUNTER, Appellant

V.

ORANGE COUNTY, TEXAS, AND KEITH MERRITT, Appellees

________________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 260th District Court

Orange County, Texas

Trial Cause No. D140114-C

________________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

The appellant, Jeremiah Gunter, and the appellees, Orange County, Texas, 

and Keith Merritt, filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 

42.1(a)(2). We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

 ________________________________

 CHARLES KREGER

 Justice

 
2

Submitted on January 18, 2017

Opinion Delivered January 19, 2017

Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,__________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A14A1999. ULLAH WARRAICH IRSHAD v. ADBUL ZAFAR.

This case began as a dispossessory proceeding in magistrate court. Following

an adverse ruling, tenant Ullah Warraich Irshad appealed the magistrate court’s

decision to the superior court. On April 24, 2014, the superior court entered

judgment in favor of landlord Abdul Zafar. On May 21, 2014, Irshad filed a notice

of appeal to this Court. We, however, lack jurisdiction.

When a superior court order involves a de novo appeal from a magistrate court

ruling, an appellant is required to follow the discretionary appeal procedure. See

OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175)

(1995). Irshad’s failure to adhere to the discretionary appeal procedure deprives us

of jurisdiction. Additionally, the appeal is untimely. An appeal in a dispossessory

action must be filed within seven days after entry of the order at issue. OCGA § 44-7-

56; Ray M. Wright, Inc. v. Jones, 239 Ga. App. 521 (521 SE2d 456) (1999). Irshad

filed his notice of appeal 27 days after entry of the superior court’s order.

Accordingly, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,__________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

07/15/2014

July 15, 2014
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Universal Capital Management, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending October 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael D. Queen, Chief Executive Officer of our Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of our Company.



|                    |                               | 
|------------------- | ----------------------------- | 
|Date:  June 7, 2013 | /s/ Michael D. Queen          | 
|                    | Michael D. Queen,             | 
|                    | Chief Executive Officer       | 
|                    | (Principal Executive Officer) | 
|                    |                               |
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5962

Aisin World Corp. of America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3055

Taurus International Corporation:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_05.09.19.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7582

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus LARRY EUGENE REED, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CR-96-22) Submitted: January 17, 2002 Decided: January 29, 2002 Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Larry Eugene Reed, Appellant Pro Se. Michael R. Smythers, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Larry Eugene Reed appeals the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and findno reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Reed , No. CR-96-22 (E.D. Va. filed July 9, 2001; entered July 10, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4357

Aisin World Corp. of America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 62 (Friday, March 31, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 16654]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7993]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health


Division of Research Grants; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
Division of Research Grants Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meetings:

    Purpose/Agenda: To review individual grant applications.
    Name of SEP: Microbiological and Immunological Sciences.
    Date: April 20, 1995.
    Time: 1 p.m.
    Place: NIH, Westwood Building, Room 236A, Telephone Conference.
    Contact Person: Dr. William Branche, Scientific Review Admin., 
5333 Westbard Ave., Room 236A, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-7297.

    Name of SEP: Microbiological and Immunological Sciences.
    Date: April 21, 1995.
    Time: 1 p.m.
    Place: NIH, Westwood Building, Room 235, Telephone Conference.
    Contact Person: Dr. Jean Hickman, Scientific Review Admin., 5333 
Westbard Ave., Room 235, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-7078.

    Name of SEP: Multidisciplinary Sciences.
    Date: April 28, 1995.
    Time: 12:00 noon.
    Place: NIH, Westwood Building, Room 2A05, Telephone Conference.
    Contact Person: Dr. Donald Schneider, Scientific Review Admin., 
5333 Westbard Ave., Room 2A05, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-7053.
    The meetings will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations imposed by 
the grant review cycle.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 27, 1995.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 95-7993 Filed 3-30-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
**Exhibit 32.2**

**STATEMENTOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period endedSeptember 30, 2006 (the “Form 10-Q”) of Cardinal Financial Corporation, I, MarkA. Wendel, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(a)           the Form 10-Q fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and

(b)           the information contained in the Form10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financialcondition and results of operations of the Company and its subsidiaries as of,and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.

 
| Date: November 8, 2006 |   | /s/ Mark A. Wendel                                   |
|------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|              |   | Mark A. Wendel                                       |
|              |   | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|              |   | (Principal Financial Officer)                        |

 

----
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-50006 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MOSES RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. W-95-CV-210

- - - - - - - - - - July 9, 1996 Before JOLLY, JONES and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Moses Ramirez, #60364-080, appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. He argues his criminal prosecution following the administrative forfeiture of $3,000 violated the Fifth Amendment prohibition against double jeopardy. Ramirez is procedurally barred from asserting a double jeopardy claim. See United States v. Frady , 456 U.S. 152, 102 S. Ct. 1584No. 96-50006 - 2 - (1982). Under United States v. Arreola-Ramos , 60 F.3d 188 (5th Cir. 1995), there can be no double jeopardy claim because he failed to contest the forfeiture. Id ., 60 F.3d at 192. AFFIRMED.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5181 

To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to modify the thrifty food 

plan to apply to the urban and rural parts of the State of Hawaii. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 8, 2023 

Ms. TOKUDA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to modify 

the thrifty food plan to apply to the urban and rural 

parts of the State of Hawaii. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Feeding Rural Fami5 lies Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT. 

7 Section 3(u)(2) of the Food and Nutrition Act of 

8 2008 (7 U.S.C. 2012(u)(2)) is amended— 

9 (1) by inserting ‘‘urban and rural parts of’’ be10 fore ‘‘Hawaii’’ the 1st place it appears, and 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5181 IH

1 (2) by inserting ‘‘urban and rural’’ before ‘‘Ha2 waii’’ the 2d place it appears. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4756

Horizon Hobby LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_05.09.19.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel