alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32




<PAGE>



      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bella Trading Company, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Sara Preston, the
Chief Executive and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of her knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects the financial condition and results of the Company.



March 3, 2006                          By:   /s/ Sara Preston
                                            ----------------------------------
                                            Sara Preston, Chief Executive
                                            and Principal Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-6812

CHARLES WALKER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at 

Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, Chief District Judge. (1:19-cv-00282-TDS-JLW)

Submitted: October 15, 2019 Decided: October 18, 2019

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and THACKER and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Walker, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Charles Walker appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of 

the magistrate judge and denying Walker’s petition for a writ of error coram nobis. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Walker v. United States, No. 1:19-cv-00282-TDS-JLW 

(M.D.N.C. May 7, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals2993207-APR-201110:30 AM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         252,049
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  606,642
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    720,507
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,780,062
<PP&E>                                      11,968,471
<DEPRECIATION>                                 773,611
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,788,533
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,343,568
<BONDS>                                      3,100,114
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    11,064,480
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,284,311)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,788,533
<SALES>                                      6,524,082
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,524,082
<CGS>                                        5,159,889
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,705,448
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              85,165
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,142,423)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (168,000)       
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,751,926)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,751,926)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.74)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.74)
        

</TABLE>
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5280 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide for the expedited review 

of actions to which the President is a party, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 25, 2023 

Mr. LIEU introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide for the 

expedited review of actions to which the President is 

a party, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Expediting Civil Liti5 gation Against the Executive Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXPEDITED REVIEW OF ACTIONS TO WHICH THE 

7 PRESIDENT IS A PARTY. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 190 of title 28, United 

9 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol10 lowing: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5280 IH

1 ‘‘§ 5002. Expedited review of actions to which the 

2 President is a party 

3 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—With respect to a covered civil 

4 action, the following shall apply: 

5 ‘‘(1) The court shall advance on the docket and 

6 expedite to the greatest possible extent the disposi7 tion of such civil action. 

8 ‘‘(2) Upon the request of a party, the civil ac9 tion shall be heard by a three-judge panel pursuant 

10 to section 2284. 

11 ‘‘(3) An appeal may be taken directly to the Su12 preme Court of the United States from any final 

13 judgment in such a civil action, and if it has not 

14 previously ruled on the question, the Supreme Court 

15 shall accept jurisdiction over the appeal, advance the 

16 appeal on the docket, and expedite the appeal to the 

17 greatest extent possible. 

18 ‘‘(b) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘covered 

19 civil action’ means a civil action in which— 

20 ‘‘(1)(A) the President has a personal financial 

21 interest; or 

22 ‘‘(B) the President’s conduct is alleged to con23 stitute sexual harassment, sexual assault, or other 

24 sexual misconduct; 

25 ‘‘(2) the President is properly joined as a party; 

26 and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5280 IH

1 ‘‘(3) the complainant has stated a valid claim 

2 upon which relief can be granted.’’. 

3 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

4 for chapter 190 of title 28, United States Code, is amend5 ed by inserting after the item related to section 5001 the 

6 following: 

‘‘5002. Expedited review of actions to which the President is a party.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 68 (Monday, April 10, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 18169]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8835]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION


Deletion of Agenda Items From Open Meeting, Wednesday, April 5, 
1995

    The following item has been deleted from the list of agenda items 
scheduled for consideration at the April 5, 1995, Open Meeting and 
previously listed in the Commission's Notice of March 29, 1995.

Item No., Bureau, and Subject

7--Wireless Telecommunications--Title: Amendment of Part 2 and 90 of 
the Commission's Rules to Provide for the Use of 200 Channels 
Outside the Designated Filing Areas in the 896-901 MHz and the 935-
940 MHz Bands Allotted to the Specialized Mobile Radio Pool (PR 
Docket No. 89-553); Implementation of Section 309(j) of the 
Communications Act--Competitive Bidding (PP Docket No. 93-253); and 
Implementation of Sections 3(n) and 322 of the Communications Act--
(GN Docket No. 93-252). Summary: The Commission will consider 
service, licensing, and auction rules for the licensing of the 900 
MHz Specialized Mobile Radio (SMR) service.

    Dated: April 5, 1995.

Federal Communications Commission.
William F. Caton,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-8835 Filed 4-6-95; 10:36 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6225

Textron Specialized Vehicles:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6380

Apergy ESP Systems, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 69 (Tuesday, April 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 18423]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8867]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION

[Finance Docket No. 32632]

Everett Railroad Company--Trackage Rights Exemption--
Hollidaysburg and Roaring Spring Railroad Company

    Hollidaysburg and Roaring Spring Railroad Company (HRS) has agreed 
to grant overhead trackage rights to Everett Railroad Company (Everett) 
over approximately 10.2 miles of rail line from milepost 8.0 at 
Hollidaysburg, PA, to milepost 18.2 at Roaring Spring, PA.1 The 
trackage rights were to become effective on March 31, 1995.2

    \1\ HRS has simultaneously filed a notice of exemption under 49 
CFR 1150.31 to purchase and operate the line in question from 
Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail). See Hollidaysburg and 
Roaring Spring Railroad Company--Acquisition and Operation 
Exemption--Consolidated Rail Corporation, Finance Docket No. 32633. 
Alan W. Maples, the controlling stockholder of both HRS and Everett, 
has filed a related petition for exemption for the continuance in 
control of HRS upon its beginning operations as a carrier and has 
established a voting trust pending approval of the petition by the 
Commission. See Alan W. Maples--Continuance in Control Exemption--
Hollidaysburg and Roaring Spring Railroad Company, Finance Docket 
No. 32631.
    \2\ The proposed consummation date is contingent on HRS 
acquiring the line from Conrail in Finance Docket No. 32633, which 
Everett states is ``on or before March 31, 1995'' (emphasis added). 
Under 49 CFR 1180.4(g)(1), consummation should not have occurred 
before March 28, 1995.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice is filed under 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(7). If the notice 
contains false or misleading information, the exemption is void ab 
initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10505(d) may 
be filed at any time. The filing of a petition to revoke will not stay 
the transaction. Pleadings must be filed with the Commission and served 
on Robert A. Wimbish, Rea, Cross & Auchincloss, 1920 N Street, N.W., 
Suite 420, Washington, D.C. 20036.
    As a condition to the use of this exemption, any employees affected 
by the trackage rights will be protected under Norfolk and Western Ry. 
Co.--Trackage Rights--BN, 354 I.C.C. 605 (1978), as modified in 
Mendocino Coast Ry., Inc.--Lease and Operate, 360 I.C.C. 653 (1980).

    Decided: April 4, 1995.

    By the Commission, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-8867 Filed 4-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7035-01-P
```
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5688

Fluor Enterprises, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 67 (Friday, April 7, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 17790]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8581]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Commonwealth Holdings, LLC, et al.; Formations of; Acquisitions 
by; and Mergers of Bank Holding Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied for the Board's 
approval under section 3 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 
1842) and Sec.  225.14 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.14) to 
become a bank holding company or to acquire a bank or bank holding 
company. The factors that are considered in acting on the applications 
are set forth in section 3(c) of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Each application is available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. Once the application has been accepted 
for processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing to the Reserve Bank or to the offices of the Board of 
Governors. Any comment on an application that requests a hearing must 
include a statement of why a written presentation would not suffice in 
lieu of a hearing, identifying specifically any questions of fact that 
are in dispute and summarizing the evidence that would be presented at 
a hearing.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received not later than May 1, 1995.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland (John J. Wixted, Jr., Vice 
President) 1455 East Sixth Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44101:
    1. Commonwealth Holdings, LLC, Burlington, Kentucky; to become a 
bank holding company by acquiring 31.75 percent of the voting shares of 
Heritage Bancorp, Inc., Burlington, Kentucky, and thereby indirectly 
acquire Heritage Bank, Inc., Burlington, Kentucky.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Zane R. Kelley, Vice President) 
104 Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303:
    1. SouthTrust Corporation, Birmingham, Alabama, and SouthTrust of 
Georgia, Inc., Roswell, Georgia; to merge with Southern Bank Group, 
Inc., Roswell, Georgia, and thereby indirectly acquire Northside Bank & 
Trust Company, Roswell, Georgia.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 3, 1995.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-8581 Filed 4-6-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7681
HERBERT CURTIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ROBERT WARD, Warden of Evans Correctional Institute; STUKEY, Major at Evans Correctional Institute; PAT BROWN, Lieutenant at Evans Correctional Institute; GIBSON, Correctional Officer at Evans Correctional Institute; GRIFFIN, Investigator at Evans Correctional Institute; M. K. GALLOWAY, Head of Grievance at Evans Correctional Institute, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-97-2515-4-18BE) Submitted: February 26, 1998 Decided: March 20, 1998 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Herbert Curtis, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Curtis v. Ward , No. CA-97- 2515-4-18BE (D.S.C. Oct. 27, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5223 

To mandate certain hours for in-person branch offices of depository 

institutions, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 18, 2023 

Mr. GREEN of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To mandate certain hours for in-person branch offices of 

depository institutions, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Original Open for 

5 Business Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEPOSITORY INSTITUTION HOURS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Beginning on the date that is 180 

8 days after the date of the enactment of this section, each 

9 branch location of a depository institution with in-person 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5223 IH

1 customer service shall remain open for business (except 

2 on a Federal holiday)— 

3 (1) until 7 p.m. on Monday, Tuesday, Wednes4 day, Thursday, or Friday; and 

5 (2) for a minimum of 4 hours on Saturday. 

6 (b) DEPOSITORY INSTITUTION DEFINED.—In this 

7 section, the term ‘‘depository institution’’ shall have the 

8 meaning given the term in section 3 of the Federal De9 posit Insurance Act. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 99.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned certifies that this periodic
report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,  and that information  contained in
this periodic report fairly presents,  in all material  respects,  the financial
condition and results of operations of Ridgewood Electric Power Trust II.

Date:  April 14, 2004        /s/ Robert E. Swanson
                             --------------------------------
                             Robert E. Swanson
                             Chief Executive Officer

Date:  April 14, 2004        /s/ Christopher I. Naunton
                             --------------------------------
                             Christopher I. Naunton
                             Chief Financial Officer
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3426

Scosche Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel