alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5122 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to include the hardening of infrastructure in support of disaster mitigation in the definition of humanitarian 

and civic assistance. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 1, 2023 

Ms. PORTER (for herself, Mr. CASE, Mr. MOYLAN, and Ms. MACE) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to include the hardening of infrastructure in support of disaster mitigation 

in the definition of humanitarian and civic assistance. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Disaster Mitigation 

5 through Military Service Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF HUMANITARIAN AND CIVIC ASSIST7 ANCE. 

8 Section 401(e)(4) of title 10, United States Code, is 

9 amended by inserting before the period at the end the folVerDate Sep 11 2014 20:03 Aug 18, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5122.IH H5122

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5122 IH

1 lowing: ‘‘or the hardening of existing infrastructure in 

2 such facilities in support of disaster mitigation’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 21

         SUBSIDIARIES OF SOUTHERN ENERGY HOMES, INC.

DIRECT SUBSIDIARIES:

1. Al/Tex Homes, Inc., d/b/a Southern Energy Homes of Texas.

2. Southern Energy Homes of North Carolina, Inc. d/b/a Imperial Homes.

3. WENCO Finance, Inc.

4. MH Transport, Inc.

5. Southern Energy Homes of Pennsylvania, Inc. d/b/a Energy Homes.

6. Southern Energy Homes Retail Corp.

7. Southern Energy Homes S.C. Retail Corp.

INDIRECT SUBSIDIARIES:

1. BR Agency, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Southern Energy Homes Retail
Corp.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5611

SGRE, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6531

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ABBAS SADEGH, a/k/a Abby,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (CR-95-113-A, CA-95-1377-A)

Submitted: January 9, 1997 Decided: January 21, 1997

Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Francis Krebs, KELLOGG, KREBS & MORAN, Fairfax, Virginia,

for Appellant. Justin W. Williams, Assistant United States Attorney, Marcus John Davis, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Abbas Sadegh appeals the district court's order denying his

motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-

132, 110 Stat. 114. We affirm.

Sadegh was convicted of arson and related offenses for burning

down his restaurant to obtain insurance proceeds. Sadegh contends

that his attorney was ineffective for failing to investigate the

Government's files and for not calling as a witness his own financial expert to show that Sadegh had means to escape his debt other

than arson. Sadegh also claims that his attorney was ineffective

for failing to meet with him a sufficient number of times.

Following a hearing, the district court determined that

Sadegh's attorney reviewed and investigated the Government's files

and theories and that it was a tactical decision not to pursue a

financial defense. An attorney's tactical decisions are entitled to

deference and should not be second guessed. See Goodson v. United

States, 564 F.2d 1071, 1072 (4th Cir. 1977). The district court

further found that Sadegh was not credible on the issue of how

often he met with his attorney. We do not review credibility

determinations on appeal. United States v. Saunders, 886 F.2d 56

(4th Cir. 1989). Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. United States v. Sadegh, Nos. CR-95-113-A; CA-95-

1377-A (E.D. Va. Feb. 12, 1996).
3

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
DENY and Opinion Filed May 1 1 , 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 21
- 00990
- CV IN RE CHG SENIOR LIVING OF FORNEY, LLC D/B/A THREE FORKS

SENIOR LIVING OF FORNEY , Relator Original Proceeding from the 191st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 19
- 20607 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Osborne, Pedersen, III, and Goldstein

Opinion by Justice Osborne In this original proceeding, relator challenges the trial court’s denia l of its motion to dismiss the claims for breach of contract, premises liability, and ordinary negligence pursuant to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 91a. See T EX

. R. C IV

. P. 91a. Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the trial court c learly
abused its discretion and that relator lacks an adequate appellate remedy. In re
Prudential Ins. Co ., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135

– 36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on our review of the petition, response, and the record before us , we conclude that relator ha s failed to demonstrate an abuse of discretion

. See T EX

. R.
A PP

. P. 52.8(a).– 2

–

Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

210990f.p05 /Leslie Osborne/ LESLIE OSBORNE JUSTICE
Exhibit 31.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Raya Asher, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Magal Security System
Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
Subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date:  June 29, 2004

/s/ Raya Asher *
----------------
Raya Asher
Chief Financial Officer
* The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the
Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
Exhibit 32.2

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Killbuck Bancshares, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Diane Knowles, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,; and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Diane S. Knowles   
|    |  | Diane S. Knowles       
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer
|    |  | May 13, 2009           

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Killbuck Bancshares,
Inc. and will be retained by Killbuck Bancshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 14, 2021

No. 04-21-00258-CR

Aaron Dominique TRAYLOR,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019-CR-6163

Honorable Melisa C. Skinner, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due on October 18, 2021. On November 17, 2021, the clerk of this 

court notified appellant’s attorney by letter that appellant’s brief was late and asked appellant’s 

attorney to respond to this court in writing. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2). Appellant’s attorney 

has not responded, and appellant’s brief has still not been filed.

We ORDER appellant’s attorney to file appellant’s brief on or before January 3, 2022. If 

appellant’s brief is not filed by that date, we will abate this appeal to the trial court for an 

abandonment hearing. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2). Contempt proceedings may also be initiated 

against appellant’s attorney. Id. 38.8(b)(4). 

_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 14th day of December, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4753

Horizon Hobby LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_05.09.19.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


         In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of TechLite,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ended  March  31,  2005 (the
"Report"),  I, J.D.  Arvidson,  Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  hereby
certify that to my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.  ss.78m or ss.78o(d));
and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated:  May 27, 2005
                                                          /s/ J.D. Arvidson
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         J.D. Arvidson
                                                         Chief Financial Officer


         The above  certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  ss.1350)  and is not being filed as
part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 10.10





OPTION AGREEMENT





This Option Agreement evidences the grant of a stock option (the "Option") to purchase shares of common stock, par value $.001 (the "Company Stock"), of Generex Biotechnology Corporation (the "Company") granted to Nola E. Masterson (the "Optionee") pursuant to the Generex Biotechnology Corporation Amended 2001 Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”), a copy of which is attached to this Option Agreement and incorporated into this Option Agreement by reference.  The Option is subject to the terms, conditions, limitations and restrictions set forth in the Plan, including the following:





a.           The date of grant of the Option is March 25, 2011, and the number of shares of Company Stock that may be purchased upon exercise of the Option is 200,000.





b.           The purchase price (the “Exercise Price”) of Company Stock subject to the Option is $0.282 per share.





c.           The Option shall become exercisable as follows, subject to the terms, conditions, limitations and restrictions set forth in the Plan:  200,000 shares will vest on March 25, 2011.  Only options that have vested may be exercised.





d.           Unless sooner terminated pursuant to the Plan, the Option shall terminate on March 25, 2016.





e.           The Optionee shall pay the Exercise Price for the Option (i) in cash or (ii) by such other method as may be approved by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors.  The Optionee shall pay the amount of any withholding tax due at the time of exercise, as provided in the Plan.





f.           The rights and interests of the Optionee under this Option Agreement may not be sold, assigned, encumbered or otherwise transferred, except, in the event of the death of the Optionee, by will or by the laws of descent and distribution.





g.           Any notice to the Company, including notice of exercise of an Option, shall be addressed to the Company in care of Mark Fletcher at the Company’s principal offices.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Option Agreement has been executed on behalf of the Company by a duly authorized officer and by the Optionee effective as of the date of grant of the Option.





GENEREX BIOTECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

ACCEPTED AND AGREED:Per:
/s/ Mark A. Fletcher

/s/ Nola E. MastersonNola E. Masterson, OptioneeName:
Mark A. Fletcher,President & CEOPer:
/s/  Stephen FellowsName:
Stephen Fellows,Acting Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 64 (Tuesday, April 4, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 17023]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7949]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 94-144; RM-8554]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Dickeyville, WI

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document allots Channel 266A to Dickeyville, Wisconsin, 
as that community's first local transmission service in response to a 
petition filed by James F. Munson. See 59 FR 65749, December 21, 1994. 
The coordinates for Channel 266A at Dickeyville are 42-37-38 and 90-35-
31. With this action, this proceeding is terminated.

DATES: Effective May 12, 1995. The window period for filing 
applications for Channel 266A at Dickeyville, will open on May 12, 
1995, and close on June 12, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Scheuerle, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Report 
and Order, MM Docket No. 94-144, adopted March 21, 1995, and released 
March 28, 1995. The full text of this Commission decision is available 
for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the 
Commission's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW, 
Washington, D.C. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, International 
Transcription Services, Inc., 2100 M Street, NW, Suite 140, Washington, 
D.C. 20037, (202) 857-3800.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

    Part 73 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: Sec. 303, 48 Stat., as amended, 1082; 47 U.S.C. 154, 
as amended.


Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Wisconsin, 
is amended by adding Dickeyville, Channel 266A.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 95-7949 Filed 4-3-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
Dear Sirs/Madame,

Thank you for your email about my exclusion request.

The submit that the request covers only one product, which is masks to hold patients in 

place for radiation therapy. I interpret “product” to mean this family of items, that all are 

made of the same materials, are all called radiation therapy masks, but have different sizes 

and shapes to accommodate different body sizes, or to attach to different tables that 

patients lay on in the hospitals.

Additionally our masks are all registered and approved as one item with the FDA

Here is the FDA approval info:

510(k) approval K022708

Regulatory Class II

Product Code 90iYE Medical Device

I hope this explains adequately. Really there are many sizes ranging from pediatric to extra 

large, and various shapes, but they are all masks for the same medical purpose.

Thank you for your consideration.

Kind Regards, 

[] 

[] 

[]

[]

[]

[]
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5087

A.W. Chesterton Company:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel