alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-6167

Nissan North America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 (the “Form 10-Q”) of Cardinal Financial Corporation (the “Company”), I, Mark A. Wendel, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

(a)           the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(b)           the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company and its subsidiaries as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.

 

 
| Date:   May 9, 2011 | /s/   Mark A. Wendel                                   |
|--------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|                     | Mark   A. Wendel                                       |
|                     | Executive   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Independent Accountants**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-97369, No. 333-63070, No. 333-42656, No. 333-30111 and No. 333-04186) and the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-90892, No. 333-89266, No. 333-73550, No. 333-59368 and No. 333-42798) ofConceptus, Inc. of our reports dated February 14, 2003 relating to the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, the consolidated statements of operations, of stockholders’ equity and of cash flows for each of thetwo years in the period ended December 31, 2002 and the financial statement schedule for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2002, which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 

 

/s/    PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP 

 

San Jose, California 

March 27, 2003
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains notices of meetings published under

the ‘‘Government in the Sunshine Act’’ (Pub.

L. 94-409) 5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3).

Sunshine Act Meetings Federal Register

17610

Vol. 60, No. 66

Thursday, April 6, 1995

UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION

Record of Vote of Meeting Closure

(Public Law 94–409) (5 U.S.C. Sec.

552b)

I, Edward F. Reilly, Jr., Chairman of

the United States Parole Commission,

presided at a meeting of said

Commission which started at

approximately nine o’clock a.m. on

Tuesday, March 27, 1995 at the

Commission’s Central Office, 5550

Friendship Boulevard, Chevy Chase,

Maryland 20815. The purpose of the

meeting was to decide five appeals from

National Commissioners’ decisions

pursuant to 28 C.F.R. Section 2.27. Six

Commissioners were present,

constituting a quorum when the vote to

close the meeting was submitted.

Public announcement further

describing the subject matter of the

meeting and certifications of General

Counsel that this meeting may be closed

by vote of the Commissioners present

were submitted to the Commissioners

prior to the conduct of any other

business. Upon motion duly made,

seconded, and carried, the following

Commissioners voted that the meeting

be closed: Edward F. Reilly, Jr., Carol

Pavilack Getty, Jasper Clay, Jr., Vincent

J. Fechtel, Jr., John R. Simpson, and

Michael J. Gaines.

In Witness Whereof, I make this

official record of the vote taken to close

this meeting and authorize this record to

be made available to the public.

Dated: March 3, 1995.

Edward F. Reilly, Jr.,

Chairman, U.S. Parole Commission.

[FR Doc. 95–8596 Filed 4–4–95; 11:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–01–M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5499

Tianhai Electric North America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Exhibit 12.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Raya Asher, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F/A of Magal Security System
Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
Subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [Reserved]

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: September 8, 2005

/s/Raya Asher
-------------
Raya Asher
Chief Financial Officer
Order entered April 24, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-00925-CR

BILLY LUFTHANSA BARNES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F12-22227-Y

ORDER

The Court GRANTS appellant’s April 10, 2013 motion to supplement the reporter’s 

record. We DENY the April 10, 2013 motion as moot to the extent it seeks an extension of time 

to file appellant’s brief.

We ORDER court reporter Sharon Hazlewood to file a supplemental reporter’s record 

within FIFTEEN DAYS from the date of this order that contains the surveillance video admitted 

as State’s Exhibit #1.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

N o. 04

- 13

- 00882

- CV
Joseph ZAPATA and Maria Banda, Appellants

v. Walter Mortgage Company LLC, WALTER MORTGAGE COMP ANY LLC
, e t al., Appellee

From the 79th Judicial Distri ct Court, Jim Wells County, Texas Trial Court No. 10

- 03

- 48880

- CV Honorable Richard C. Terrell, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 5, 2014

DIS MISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

The clerk’s record wa s due on January 13, 2014. On January 6, 2014, the trial court clerk

filed a Notification of Late Record stating the clerk’s record w ould not be filed because appellant s

ha d faile d to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the record and that

appellant s are not entitled to appeal without paying the fee. Accordingly, on January 13, 2014,

this court order ed appellants to provide written proof to this court no later than January 23, 2014

that either (1) the clerk’s fee ha d been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the clerk’ s fee;

or (2) appellants are entitled to appeal without paying the clerk’s fee. Our order cautioned04

- 13

- 00882

- CV

appellant s that if they fail ed to file such written proof within the time provided, this appeal w ould

be dismissed for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 37.3(b).
Appellants have not responded; therefore, this appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM

- 2

-
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6159

SGRE, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

July 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 130738 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 130738 

 COA: 266142 

Washtenaw CC: 01-000892-FH 

GLORIA NOBLE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 17, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d0724 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

July 31, 2006 

 Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED,

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Multimedia Games, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Clifton E. Lind, Chief Executive Officer, and Craig S. Nouis, Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 906), that, based upon my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: January 26, 2005 |  | /s/ Clifton E. Lind    
|                        |  | Clifton E. Lind        
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                        | 
|                        |  | /s/ Craig S. Nouis     
|                        |  | Craig S. Nouis         
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
Multimedia Games, Inc., and will be retained by Multimedia Games, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



-73-
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-5667

Nissan North America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 61 (Thursday, March 30, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 16470]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7789]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

Ocean Freight Forwarder License Applicants

    Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have filed 
with the Federal Maritime Commission applications for licenses as ocean 
freight forwarders pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 
(46 U.S.C. app. 1718 and 46 CFR 510).
    Persons knowing of any reason why any of the following applicants 
should not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of 
Freight Forwarders, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, D.C. 
20573.

Gilbert International, Inc., 330 S. Stiles Street, Linden, NJ 07036, 
Officers: Richard Gilbert, President, Ken Gross, Vice President
Worchel Transport Inc. d/b/a Prime Transport, 182-09 149th Road, 
Springfield Gardens, NY 11413, Officers: Sam Fischel, President, David 
Wortman, Vice President
King Yang Shipping, Inc., 222431 S. Vermont Avenue, Torrance, CA 90502, 
Officer: Arthur King, President
Quality Customs Broker, Inc. dba, Quality Freight Services 
International, 7071 South 13th Street, Suite 103, Oak Creek, WI 53154, 
Officer: Karin La Freniere, President
All-Cargo Express, 7800 North University Drive, #201, Tamarac, FL 
33321, Alfred L. Cohen, Sole Proprietor

    Dated: March 27, 1995.

    By the Federal Maritime Commission.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-7789 Filed 3-29-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
#### Susan BURLISON, et al., Plaintiffs/Respondents, v. LOMAS MORTGAGE, USA, INC., Defendant/Appellant.

No. 65447.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Nov. 1, 1994.

Garry McCubbin, St. Louis, for appellant.

Charles R. Schroeder, Law Office of Charles Schroeder, St. Peters, for respondents.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from an order denying its motion to set aside a default judgment. We affirm. No error of law appears and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 62 (Friday, March 31, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 16678]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7933]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Labor Advisory Committee for Trade Negotiations and Trade Policy; 
Meeting Notice

    Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(P.L. 92-463 as amended), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the 
Labor Advisory Committee for Trade Negotiations and Trade Policy.

DATE, TIME AND PLACE: April 13, 1995, 10:00 am-12:00 noon, U.S. 
Department of Labor, Room S-1011, 200 Constitution Ave., NW., 
Washington, D.C. 20210.

PURPOSE: The meeting will include a review and discussion of current 
issues which influence U.S. trade policy. Potential U.S. negotiating 
objectives and bargaining positions in current and anticipated trade 
negotiations will be discussed. Pursuant to section 9(B) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B) it has been 
determined that the meeting will be concerned with matters the 
disclosure of which would seriously compromise the Government's 
negotiating objectives or bargaining positions. Accordingly, the 
meeting will be closed to the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Fernand Lavallee, Director, Trade Advisory Group. Phone: (202) 219-
4752.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 27th day of March 1995.
Joaquin Otero,
Deputy Under Secretary, International Affairs.
[FR Doc. 95-7933 Filed 3-30-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-28-M
```
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 26, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-4398

Valmet, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel