alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

October 18, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2224

Johnson Level & Tool Mfg. Co., Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
IIB 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 510 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 10, 2024 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

AN ACT 

To require the United States Governor of, and the United 

States Executive Director at, the International Monetary 

Fund to oppose an increase in the weight of the Chinese 

renminbi in the Special Drawing Rights basket of the 

Fund, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

HR 510 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Chinese Currency Ac3 countability Act of 2023’’. 

4 SEC. 2. OPPOSITION OF THE UNITED STATES TO AN IN5 CREASE IN THE WEIGHT OF THE CHINESE 

6 RENMINBI IN THE SPECIAL DRAWING RIGHTS 

7 BASKET OF THE INTERNATIONAL MONETARY 

8 FUND. 

9 The Secretary of the Treasury shall instruct the 

10 United States Governor of, and the United States Execu11 tive Director at, the International Monetary Fund to use 

12 the voice and vote of the United States to oppose any in13 crease in the weight of the Chinese renminbi in the basket 

14 of currencies used to determine the value of Special Draw15 ing Rights, unless the Secretary of the Treasury has sub16 mitted to the Committee on Financial Services of the 

17 House of Representatives and the Committee on Banking, 

18 Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate a written report 

19 which includes a certification that— 

20 (1) the People’s Republic of China is in compli21 ance with all its obligations under Article VIII of the 

22 Articles of Agreement of the Fund; 

23 (2) in the preceding 12 months, there has not 

24 been a report submitted under section 3005 of the 

25 Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988 or 

26 section 701 of the Trade Facilitation and Trade EnVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:10 Sep 11, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H510.RFS H510

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

HR 510 RFS

1 forcement Act of 2015 in which the People’s Repub2 lic of China has been found to have manipulated its 

3 currency; and 

4 (3) the People’s Republic of China adheres to 

5 the rules and principles of the Paris Club and the 

6 OECD Arrangement on Officially Supported Export 

7 Credits. 

8 SEC. 3. SUNSET. 

9 Section 2 shall have no force or effect beginning 10 

10 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 9, 

2024. 

Attest: KEVIN F. MCCUMBER, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
EXHIBIT
21.1
  
 SUBSIDIARIES
OF REGISTRANT
   MegaBingo,
Inc., a Delaware corporation
  MGAM
Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation
  MGAM
Services, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
  Innovative
Sweepstakes Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation
  MGAM
Systems International, Inc., a Delaware corporation
  MegaBingo
International, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
  Multimedia
Games de México 1 S. de R.L. de C.V., a Mexican entity
  Servicios
de Wild Basin S. de R.L. de C.V., a Mexican entity
chyu_ex103.htm


EXHIBIT 10.3


 


ACCEPTANCE AND WAIVER







Reference is hereby made to that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Agreement”) dated as of June 1, 2011 among China Youth Media, Inc., China Youth Media Merger Sub, Inc., and Midwest Energy Emissions Corp. (the “Company”).







The undersigned hereby accepts the delivery of (a) the audited balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2009 and 2010 and the related audited statements of income, statements of cash flows and changes in stockholders’ equity for the years then ended, and the notes relating thereto, and (b) the unaudited balance sheets of the Company as of April 30, 2011, and the related unaudited statements of income, statements of cash flows and changes in stockholders’ equity for the four month periods ended April 30, 2011 and 2010, and the notes relating thereto, in full compliance of the requirements set forth in Section 7.8 of the Agreement, and hereby waives any other condition in the Agreement contrary thereto.







Dated as of June 21, 2011   


 





	 	
CHINA YOUTH MEDIA, INC.,

	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	By:	
/S/Jay Rifkin

	 
	 	Name: 

Title: 	
Jay Rifkin


Chief Executive Officer


 

	 
	 	
CHINA YOUTH MEDIA MERGER SUB, INC.,



	 
	 	By:	

/S/Jay Rifkin



	 
	 	Name: 

Title:	
Jay Rifkin


Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 7.1   SBS
BROADCASTING
SA  CALCULATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES  Years
  ended December 31,1999
  
  2000
  
  2001
  
  2002
  
  2003Income (loss) before income taxes and
  minority interest
  
  (42,964
  )
  (97,508
  )
  (120,263
  )
  (30,424
  )
  49,856Add: undistributed earnings of  unconsolidated subsidiaries
  
  -13,213
  
  -24,536
  
  -25,749
  
  -33,232
  
  -7,273Total
  
  (29,751
  )
  (72,972
  )
  (94,514
  )
  2,808
  
  57,129Fixed chargesInterest expense
  
  17,490
  
  16,702
  
  24,331
  
  26,831
  
  26,28825% of operating lease
  
  11,234
  
  10,897
  
  10,946
  
  11,041
  
  8,250Total fixed charges
  
  28,724
  
  27,599
  
  35,277
  
  37,872
  
  34,538Total earnings
  available for payment of fixed charges
  
  
  *
  
  *
  
  *
  40,680
  
  91,667Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  1.07
  
  2.65Expenses under opeating leases
  
  44,936
  
  43,586
  
  43,783
  
  44,162
  
  32,999  
 *) Earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges by  29.8 million, 73.0million and 94.5
million in the years ended December 31, 1999, 2000 and 2001, respectively.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Bruce Wright, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Hillery, J.), rendered September 24, 1987, convicting him of attempted burglary in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The complaining witness had occasion to observe the defendant for approximately 10 minutes after she had discovered him while he was in the process of burglarizing her apartment. Her observations were made at close range and under good lighting conditions. Under these circumstances, the County Court correctly determined that there was an independent basis for the witness’s identification of the defendant during trial, and that suppression of the witness’s in-court identification was not therefore required, even though she had participated in a suggestive pretrial identification procedure *(cf., People v Allah,*158 AD2d 605; *People v Finnerty,*152 AD2d 635, 636; *People v Hill,*147 AD2d 500, 501).

*652The sentence imposed was appropriate under all of the circumstances of this case. Bracken, J. P., Hooper, Rubin and Miller, JJ., concur.
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Cyndi MAJORS, Defendant/Appellant. Cyndi MAJORS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

Nos. 68166, 69509.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

June 11, 1996.

David Simpson, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., David G. Brown, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before KAROHL, Acting P.J., and GRIMM and DOWD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

A jury found defendant guilty of passing a bad check, § 570.120, RSMo 1994. The trial court found her to be a prior offender and sentenced her to five years imprisonment. She appeals the judgment and the denial of her Rule 29.15 motion.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgments are affirmed pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 58 (Monday, March 27, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15746]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7381]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Alaska Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of 
the Alaska Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 1:00 
p.m. and adjourn at 3:30 p.m. on Thursday, May 4, 1995, at the 
Anchorage Hilton, 500 West Third Avenue, Anchorage, Alaska 99501. The 
purpose of the meeting is to plan and discuss civil rights issues in 
the State.
    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation 
to the Committee, should contact Committee Chairperson Rosalee T. 
Walker, 907-586-2873, or Philip Montez, Director of the Western 
Regional Office, 213-894-3437 (TDD 213-894-0508). Hearing-impaired 
persons who will attend the meeting and require the services of a sign 
language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least five 
(5) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, March 17, 1995.
Carol-Lee Hurley,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 95-7381 Filed 3-24-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-5433

Radio Systems Corp: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 26, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-5060

Goodman Manufacturing Company, L.P.:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of General Growth Properties, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 3-K for the year ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bernard
Freibaum, in my capacity as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                           Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
                           Act of 1934; and

                  (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly
                           presents, in all material respects, the financial
                           condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/:Bernard Freibaum
---------------------------------------------
Bernard Freibaum
Chief Financial Officer
March 11, 2004
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Michael D. Queen, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Universal Capital Management, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  March 15, 2012



/s/ Michael D. Queen

Michael D. Queen,

Principal Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 6 (Tuesday, January 10, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 2493]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-559]



========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents 
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed 
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published 
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. 
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each 
week.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 6 / Tuesday, January 10, 1995 / Rules 
and Regulations
[[Page 2493]]

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Marketing Service

7 CFR Part 201


Amendments to Regulations Under the Federal Seed Act

AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.

ACTION: Correction to Final Rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to the final regulation 
(59 FR 64486-64521) published on December 14, 1994. The regulations 
concerned certain provisions of the Federal Seed Act (FSA).

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 13, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James P. Triplitt, Chief, Seed 
Regulatory and Testing Branch, Livestock and Seed Division, AMS, USDA, 
Building 506, BARC-E, Beltsville, Maryland 20705, telephone 301-504-
9430.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    As published, this final rule contains changes to the FSA 
regulations. Common and scientific names of several agricultural and 
vegetable seeds are updated. Germination evaluation descriptions and 
use of the fluorescence test in determining pure seed percentages of 
ryegrasses are changed. Test methods are added for coated seed and for 
determining the presence of fungal endophyte in seeds. Standards for 
certified seed are updated and several kinds of agricultural and 
vegetable seeds are added to those kinds subject to the FSA.

Need for Correction

    The final rule as published contains an error in the amendatory 
language affecting 7 CFR part 201.49.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, in the December 14, 1994, publication, on page 64498, 
in the first column, the amendatory language revising Sec. 201.49 
should read as follows:


Sec. 201.49  [Corrected]

    ``22. Section 201.49 is amended designating the existing text as 
paragraph (a) and revising it, and adding and reserving paragraph (b) 
to read as follows:''


    Dated: January 4, 1995.
Barry L. Carpenter,
Director, Livestock and Seed Division.
[FR Doc. 95-559 Filed 1-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-5174

Nissan North America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel