alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-1977

GHL International, Inc: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 57 (Friday, March 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15567]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7324]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
[FEMA-1046-DR]


California; Amendment to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of California (FEMA-1046-DR), dated March 12, 1995, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 17, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Pauline C. Campbell, Response and Recovery Directorate, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3606.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the State 
of California dated March 12, 1995, is hereby amended to include the 
following area among those areas determined to have been adversely 
affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President 
in his declaration of March 12, 1995:

The county of Solano for Individual Assistance and Public 
Assistance.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 83.516, Disaster 
Assistance)
Richard W. Krimm,
Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 95-7324 Filed 3-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5892

Dallas Airmotive, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
#### In the Matter of Gary E. Bogle, Petitioner, v Thomas A. Coughlin, III, as Commissioner of the Department of Correctional Services, Respondent.

Casey, J.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

The misbehavior report involved in this case arising out of Shawangunk Correctional Facility in Ulster County charges petitioner with violating a prison rule which prohibits inmates from altering, forging or counterfeiting any facility documents. According to the report, authored by Correction Sergeant Falkena, petitioner gave Correction Officer Potter a disbursement form "signed in the name of Inmate Bonner”. Falkena compared the signature on the form to other documents in Bonner’s file and concluded that the signature on the disbursement form was not Bonner’s.

Assuming that Falkena’s opinion as to the authenticity of the signature on the disbursement form was sufficient to establish that the disbursement form was forged, there is absolutely no evidence that petitioner was the one who forged the document. Falkena conceded that he could not prove petitioner was the forger, and he also conceded that no effort was made to compare the signature on the document form with any samples of petitioner’s handwriting in his file. Since *790petitioner was charged with actually forging the instrument, not mere possession of a forged instrument, the determination of guilt is totally lacking in evidentiary support and must be annulled.

Determination annulled, without costs, petition granted and respondent is directed to expunge all references to the matter from petitioner’s records. Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Levine, JJ., concur.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 26, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-3869

Whirlpool Corporation:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
----

----

| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |  By:  /s/ Kenneth Glynn                                                                           |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                Kenneth Glynn               |
|   |                President                   |
|   |                Chief Executive Officer and |
|   |                Chief Financial Officer     |
|   |                                                                                                             |
|   |                                                                                                             |
|   |          December 8, 2010                                                |

----

----
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Gregory E. Lichtwardt, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of Conceptus, Inc., a Delaware corporation;
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 26, 2013



|                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ GREGORY E. LICHTWARDT                                                 
|Gregory E. Lichtwardt
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4326

SPM Flow Control, Inc. DBA Weir SPM:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 66 (Thursday, April 6, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17602-17603]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8490]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 2186]


Shipping Coordinating Committee, Maritime Safety Committee; 
Notice of Meeting

    The Shipping Coordinating Committee (SHC) will conduct an open 
meeting at 9:30 A.M. on Wednesday, May 3, 1995, in Room 2415, at U.S. 
Coast Guard Headquarters, 2100 Second Street, SW., Washington, DC. The 
purpose of this meeting will be to finalize preparations for the 65th 
Session of the Maritime Safety Committee (MSC 65), and associated 
bodies of the International Maritime Organization (IMO), which is 
scheduled for May 9-17, 1995 at IMO Headquarters in London. At the 
meeting, papers received and the draft U.S. positions will be 
discussed.
    Among other things, the items of particular interest are:

a. RO/RO ferry safety
b. Bulk carrier safety
c. Role of the human element
d. Existing ship safety standards
e. Strategy for ship/port interface, and
f. Report of eight subcommittees, Bulk Chemicals, Radio Communications, 
Ship Design and Equipment, Training and Watchkeeping, Flag State 
Implementation, Stability, Loadlines and Fishing Vessels, Containers 
and Cargoes, and Lifesaving, Search and Rescue

    Members of the public may attend this meeting up to the seating 
capacity of the room. Interested persons may seek information by 
writing to Mr. Joseph J. Angelo, U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters (G-MI), 
2100 Second Street, SW., Room 2408 Washington, DC [[Page 17603]] 20593-
0001 or by calling (202) 267-2970.

    Dated: March 22, 1995.
Charles A. Mast,
Chairman, Shipping Coordinating Committee.
[FR Doc. 95-8490 Filed 4-5-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-07-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4806

Arrowhead Electrical Products, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-5284

ECM Industries LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5496

Fluor Enterprises, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-15-00337-CR

IN RE Abelardo G. GONZALEZ

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: August 5, 2015

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED AS MOOT

On June 2, 2015, relator Abelardo G. Gonzalez filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus, 

complaining of his inability to obtain a ruling on his second motion to recuse, filed on March 3, 

2015. However, on July 30, 2015, this court received a copy of an Order Denying Motion to 

Recuse, signed by the Presiding Judge of the Fourth Administrative Judicial Region of Texas on 

July 16, 2015. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied as moot. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 52.8(a). 

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause Nos. 2008CRR000657 D1, 2008CRR000662 D1, 2008CRR000665 D1, styled 

The State of Texas v. Abelardo Gerardo Gonzalez, pending in the 49th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas, 

the Honorable Jose A. Lopez presiding.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-5431

Robert Bosch Tool:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXHIBIT 21.1
                  SUBSIDIARIES OF PRIME MEDICAL SERVICES, INC.
                              AS OF MARCH 19, 1999

    EXHIBIT 21.1
    Name of Subsidiary                           State of Incorporation
    -------------------                          --------------------
    Prime Medical Operating, Inc.                Delaware

    Prime Management, Inc.                       Nevada

    Prime Cardiac Rehabilitation Services, Inc.  Delaware

    Prime Diagnostic Services, Inc.              Delaware

    Prime Lithotripsy Services, Inc.             New York

    Prime Kidney Stone Treatment, Inc.           New Jersey

    Prime Diagnostic Corp. of Florida            Delaware

    Prime Lithotripter Operations, Inc.          New York

    Prime Practice Management, Inc.              New York

    R.R. Litho, Inc.                             Delaware

    Ohio Litho, Inc.                             Delaware

    Alabama Renal Stone Institute, Inc.          Alabama

    Sun Medical Technologies, Inc.               California

    Sun Acquisition, Inc.                        California

    Lithotripters, Inc.                          North Carolina

    FastStart, Inc.                              North Carolina

    National Lithotripters Association, Inc.     North Carolina

    Prostatherapies, Inc                         Delaware

    MedTech Investments, Inc.                    North Carolina

    Executive Medical Enterprises, Inc.          Delaware