alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex1027.htm


Exhibit 10.27


 


AGREEMENT


 


PartA: Yangling Dongke Madisen pharmaceutical Ltd.


Address: Xinqiao Road 8 Yangling Demonstration Zone


 


Party B: Dongke Zhao


ID NO.: 610113541118041


 


 


In witness of :


 


1  In 2005, PartyB have already applied for patent for the following products: Huanglong Zhike Granule (cure respiratory disease), Huanglong Kechuan Capsule (cure respiratory disease), Xinxinshu Capsule (Chinese traditional medicine cure heart-throb), Senguiyangxue Tablets (Chinese traditional medicine cure weak and fatigue), Fuyanshu Capsule ( cure pelvic inflammatory disease), Qinchuantongbi Tablets, Fufangzushima (Chinese traditional medicine cure soft tissue pain), Xiaoerzhixie Paste.


 


2  In 2007, PartyA was added endowment to the company, and the knowledge property right of the following products are all belongs to PartyA. It includes: Huanglong Zhike Granule (cure respiratory disease), Huanglong Kechuan Capsule (cure respiratory disease), Xinxinshu Capsule (Chinese traditional medicine cure heart-throb), Senguiyangxue Tablets (Chinese traditional medicine cure weak and fatigue), Fuyanshu Capsule ( cure pelvic inflammatory disease), Qinchuantongbi Tablets, Fufangzushima (Chinese traditional medicine cure soft tissue pain).


 


3 PartyA decided to buy the knowledge property rights of  Xiaoerzhitong Paste.


 


 




  





  











  






 


 


According to the people’s republic of china contract law and other applicable law, both parties are agreed to abide by the following items:


 


 


1  When PartyA completes the capital increase and purchase, the knowledge property rights of the above-mentioned eight products are all belongs to PartyA, including patent application rights and patent authorization.


 


2  When PartyA completes the capital increase and purchase, PartyB should cooperate with PartyA to finish the transfer procedure.


 


3  Before PartyA get the legal authority and finish the transfer procedure, PartyB must make commitment that he is only represent PartyA to submit the patent application to the state, and do not enjoy any rights related to it.


 


4  PartyA pays the transfer expenses, and the annual fees.


 


5  Both Parties is entitled to rights and obligations according to this agreement, any party can not violate.


 


6  When PartyA get the above-mentioned patent, PartyB can not use, or transform it without the consent of PartyA.


 


7  Both parties are entitled to reach additional agreement to cover the unmentioned items in the agreement. The additional one has the same legal effect.


 


8  This agreement has two copies, which have the same effect.


 


 




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	PartA(Signature sealed)         	 	 	Party B(Signature)	 
	January 1, 2007    	 	 	January 1, 2007
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4944

Apergy ESP Systems, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
ex1021.htm


Exhibit 10.21



Supply contract


 


Party A (buyer): Yangling Dongke Madisen Pharmaceutical co.,Ltd


Party B (supplier): Xi’an Yinhai Industrial Fabrics co.,Ltd


Sign Place: Shaanxi Yangling


Sign Date: Sep 1, 2009


 


Based on the mutual trust and understanding, two parties reach the following agreements:


 


1 Products Name, Specifications, Quantity, Total Amount, Delivery Date and Remark


 



	
Products Name

	
Unit

	
Quantity

	
Unit price

	
Amount

	
Delivery Date and Remark


	
Nature color


cloth

	
 meter

	  	
3.45yuan/meter

	  	
Based on the order sheet


	
Bleached cloth

	
meter

	  	
3.3 yuan/meter

	  
	
Elastic cloth

	
meter

	  	
5.3 yuan/meter

	  
	
Total Amount (in words):

	  





 


2 Quality and Technical Standard: QBYY006-2002 Standards of supplier and the buyer’s insider control standards.


 


3 Place of Delivery: Xi’an.


 


4 Means of Transportation and Expenses and Place of Delivery: the buyer deliveries the good but PartyB pay the expenses.


 


5 Objection Period: within 10days after receiving the goods.


 


6 Terms of Payment: bank remittance; within 7days after receiving the goods.


 


7 Other Provision: The buyer will deduct quality earnest money 10000RMB till the termination of the contract. This contract will keep in force within one year, and the price will flow with the market.


 


8 Remarks: Supplier issues 17% VAT invoice; the fax file has the same effect.


 


Party A: Yangling Dongke Madisen Pharmaceutical co.,Ltd


Address: 8 Xinqiao Road Yangling Demonstration Zone


Zip Code: 712100


 


Party B:Xi’an Yinhai Industrial Fabrics co.,Ltd


Address: Room 18 Unit 2 Building 13 Families District 623 on diangzi 2 Road Xi'an Electronic City
Exhibit 99.1

 

 

 

April 1, 2002

 

 

Securities and ExchangeCommissionWashington, DC

 

 

Arthur Andersen LLP hasrepresented to Enchira Biotechnology Corporation that its audit was subject toAndersen’s quality control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing practiceto provide reasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliancewith professional standards and that there was appropriate continuity ofAndersen personnel working on the audit and availability of national officeconsultation to conduct the relevant portions of the audit.

 

Yours truly,

 

/s/ Paul G. Brown

 

Paul G. Brown, III

Chief Financial Officerand Vice President — Finance and Administration
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

August 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5252

David C. Poole Company:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5773

Enerpac:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4371

Milacron:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed August 5, 2019

.

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 19

- 00638

- CR

DAVID ALLEN MCHAM , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Kaufman County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 18

- 90145

- CC2

- F


### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Whitehill, Partida

- Kipness, and Pedersen, III

Opinion by Justice Pedersen, III Before the Court is appellant’s July 23, 2019 motion to dismiss the appeal. The motion is signed by appellant and by counsel. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.2(a). We GRANT the motion and

DISMISS the appeal.

Do Not Publish T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2 (b)

190638F.U05 /Bill Pedersen, III/ BILL PEDERSEN, III JUSTICE– 2

– 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

DAVID ALLEN MCHAM, Appellant

No. 05

- 19

- 00638

- CR V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2, Kaufman County, Texas Trial Cou rt Cause No. 18

- 90145

- CC2

- F. Opinion delivered by Justice Pedersen, III, Justices Whitehill and Partida

- Kipness participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

Judgment entered this 5th day of August, 2019.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4188

New York Air Brake LLC:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_03.20.19.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
NO. 07-06-0312-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL A

	SEPTEMBER 8, 2006

	______________________________

	AIR AMERICA, APPELLANT

	V.

	JERRY KEENE, APPELLEE

	_________________________________

	FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

	NO. 2005-597,349; HONORABLE PAULA LANEHART, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before REAVIS and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

	MEMORANDUM OPINION

	Pending before this Court is appellant Air America’s unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal.  Pursuant to Rule 42.1(a)(1) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.  As requested in the motion, costs are assessed against Air America.  Having dismissed the appeal at Air America’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.

						Don H. Reavis

						    Justice
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 68 (Monday, April 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 18094]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8673]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. FA 92-61-001]


Kentucky Power Co.; Electric Rates: Hearing, Accounting; Order 
Deferring Hearing Procedures

April 4, 1995.
    On November 25, 1994, the Chief Accountant issued a contested audit 
report, under delegated authority, noting that Kentucky Power Company 
(Kentucky Power) disagreed with certain recommendations made by the 
Division of Audits related to Kentucky Power's accounting for amounts 
billed by an affiliated service company. The Chief Accountant requested 
that Kentucky Power notify the Commission whether it would agree to 
dispose of the contested issue under the shortened procedures provided 
for by Part 41 of the Commission's regulations. Kentucky Power Co., 69 
FERC 62,172; See 18 CFR part 41.
    On December 6, 1994, American Electric Power Service Corporation 
(AEPSC), responding for Kentucky Power, requested that the Commission 
defer further action on the contested issue pending the completion of a 
proceeding before the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). AEPSE 
informed the Chief Accountant that the SEC is considering a similar 
issue in its proposed amendments to Form U-13-60. The American Electric 
Power Company (AEP) and other registered public utility holding 
companies have responded to the SEC's request for public comment on 
this subject in FR Doc. 94-23164. AEPSC indicates that Kentucky Power 
and the other jurisdictional AEP system companies may agree to adopt 
the recommendations of the Division of Audits related to the accounting 
classification of service company billings depending upon the final 
order of the SEC.
    It is ordered:
    (A) Further proceedings concerning the appropriateness of Kentucky 
Power's practices as discussed in the November 25, 1994, report issued 
by the Chief Accountant are hereby deferred pending completion of the 
proceeding before the SEC.
    (B) Kentucky Power shall keep the Office of Chief Accountant 
advised of the status of the proceeding before the SEC. On or before 
June 30, 1995, and every six months thereafter, Kentucky Power shall 
provide the Commission a full status report on the proceeding and how 
it affects the issue raised by the Division of Audits.
    (C) This order shall be published in the Federal Register.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-8673 Filed 4-7-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
WebFilings | EDGAR view


      Exhibit 10.2

         REVISIONS TO COMPENSATORY ARRANGEMENTS OF DIRECTORS

         The compensation committee of the board of directors of RadiSys Corporation approved non-employee director compensation, effective as of April 1, 2010, as follows:

          

         
            	
                     Director annual retainer

                  	
                     $31,000

                  
	
                     Chairman of the Board annual retainer

                  	
                     $66,000

                  
	
                     Audit Committee Chairman

                  	
                     $17,000

                  
	
                     Compensation and Development Committee Chairman

                  	
                     $10,000

                  
	
                     Nominating and Governance Committee Chairman

                  	
                     $8,000

                  
	
                     Compensation and Development Committee membership

                  	
                     $5,000

                  
	
                     Nominating and Governance Committee membership

                  	
                     $4,000

                  
	
                     Audit Committee membership

                  	
                     $7,500
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                           CONSENT OF BDO SEIDMAN, LLP


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

MULTIMEDIA GAMES, INC.
AUSTIN, TEXAS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements of Multimedia Games, Inc., on Form S-8 (File No. 333-23123, and File
No. 333-51072) of our report dated December 15, 2000, relating to the
consolidated financial statements and schedules of Multimedia Games, Inc. and
subsidiaries appearing in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the two
years ended September 30, 2000.


BDO Seidman, LLP

Houston, Texas
December 15, 2000
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5800

Tianhai Electric North America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
---

---

Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report
of Magal Security System Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending
December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Izhar Dekel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|/s/ Izhar Dekel*
Izhar DekelChief Executive Officer |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

June 30, 2008

*     The
originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the Companys
offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.



---

---
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                      CONSENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Multimedia Games, Inc., on Form S-8 (File No. 333-23123 and File No. 333-51072)
of our report dated December 4, 1998, on our audit of the consolidated financial
statements of Multimedia Games, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended
September 30, 1998, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Tulsa, Oklahoma
December 22, 2000