alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 56 (Thursday, March 23, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15289]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7094]



[[Page 15289]]

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP95-72-000]


Northern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Cancellation of Technical 
Conference

March 17, 1995.
    Take notice that the technical conference originally scheduled to 
be held on Friday, March 24, 1995, at 10 a.m., has been canceled until 
further notice.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-7094 Filed 3-22-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       1,271,528
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,211,069
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (564,000)
<INVENTORY>                                 36,391,887
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            45,437,549
<PP&E>                                      33,321,403
<DEPRECIATION>                            (10,878,976)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              89,394,544
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       28,050,476
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       22,966,062
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        27,552
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,555,046)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                89,394,544
<SALES>                                     49,675,691
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            49,675,691
<CGS>                                       32,256,264
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               32,256,264
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            16,334,302
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                12,587
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             745,498
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                339,627
<INCOME-TAX>                                   135,850
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            203,777
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   203,777
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.35)
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 (a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT I, Phillip J. Smith, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of Stater Bros. Holdings Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the registrant and have:  a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and  c)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants fourth fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: May 6, 2005 /s/ Phillip J. SmithPhillip J. SmithSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Horizon Group Properties, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gary J. Skoien, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the bestof my knowledge:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: | August 14,  2003 |                     | /s/ Gary J.  Skoien |   |
|--------|------------------|--------------------------|---------------------|--------|
|   |             | Gary J. Skoien           |
|   |             | Chief  Executive Officer |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
Termination of Severance and Change of Control Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 

 

 

 Douglas L. Schmick 

1414 NW Northrup St. Suite 700 
 Portland, Oregon
97209 
 March 29, 2010 
 Bill
Freeman 
 Chief Executive Officer 

1414 NW Northrup St. Suite 700 
 Portland, Oregon
97209 
 Bill Freeman, 
 In connection
with my resignation as Chief Executive Officer on January 12, 2009, I confirm and agree that my severance and change of control agreement with the Company is terminated effective January 12, 2009. 

Respectfully, 
  

	
	
	/s/ Douglas L. Schmick


Douglas L. Schmick 

Co-Founder & Chairmen of the Board of Directors
<PAGE>



                                  Exhibit 99.1

                         INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT'S REPORT
                         -------------------------------

Board of Directors
Killbuck Bancshares, Inc.

We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Killbuck
Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiary as of June 30, 2002 and the related consolidated
statements of income for the six-month and three-month periods ended June 30,
2002 and 2001 and the consolidated statement of cash flows for the six-month
period ended June 30, 2002 and 2001 and the consolidated statement of changes in
shareholders' equity for the six-month period ended June 30, 2002. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial
information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial
data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance
with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the
objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial
statements taken as a whole. Accordingly we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying financial statements for them to be in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have previously audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States of America, the consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2001, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in
shareholders' equity and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented
herein); and in our report dated January 31, 2002 we expressed an unqualified
opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the
information set forth in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2001, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to
the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.

/s/S.R. SNODGRASS, A.C.


Steubenville, Ohio
August 6, 2002

S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.
626 North Fourth Street
Steubenville, Ohio 43952-1982
Phone: 740-282-2771
Facsimile: 740-282-1606
**EXHIBIT 31(a)**

I, Henry Dattler, chief executive officer of OPENLiMiT, Inc. (“Registrant”) certify that: 

1.     I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (“Report”) of Registrant; 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report; 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this Report; 

4.     I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: 

a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared; 

b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and 

c)     Disclosed in this Report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.     I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

Date: November 14, 2005 

/s/ Henry Dattler

Henry Dattler 

Chief Executive Officer 

----
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-40666 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee
v. IRINEO ESPINO-REYES Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:07-CR-77-ALL Before KING, BARKSDALE, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Irineo Espino-Reyes raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separatecriminal offense. SeeUnited Statesv. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (Aug. 28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and thejudgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D November 8, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4473

CW Bearing USA, Inc:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 65 (Wednesday, April 5, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 17315]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8251]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 032495E]


Endangered Species; Permits

    On December 23, 1994, notice was published (59 FR 66296) that an 
application had been filed by Boyd Kynard of the National Biological 
Survey, to take listed shortnose sturgeon as authorized by the 
Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA) (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543) and the NMFS 
regulations governing listed fish and wildlife permits (50 CFR parts 
217-222).
    Notice is hereby given that on March 29, 1995, as authorized by the 
provisions of the ESA, NMFS issued Permit Number 944 for the above 
taking, subject to certain conditions set forth therein.
    Issuance of this permit, as required by the ESA, was based on a 
finding that such permit: (1) Was applied for in good faith; (2) will 
not operate to the disadvantage of the listed species which is the 
subject of this permit; (3) is consistent with the purposes and 
policies set forth in section 2 of the ESA. This permit was also issued 
in accordance with and is subject to parts 217-222 of Title 50 CFR, the 
NMFS regulations governing listed species permits.
    The application, permit, and supporting documentation are available 
for review by interested persons in the following offices, by 
appointment:
    Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, 1335 East-West Highway, Silver 
Spring, MD 20910-3226 (301-713-1401); and
    Northeast Region, NMFS, NOAA, One Blackburn Drive, Gloucester, MA 
01930 (508-281-9250).

    Dated: March 30, 1995.
Russell J. Bellmer,
Chief, Endangered Species Division, Office of Protected Resources, 
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 95-8251 Filed 4-4-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

[GRANT THORNTON LETTERHEAD]



                    REPORT OF INDEPENDENT OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



Board of Directors
Dearborn Bancorp, Inc.

We have audited the consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders'
equity and cash flows of Dearborn Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiary for the year
ended December 31, 1998. These financial statements are the responsibility of
the Corporation's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects the results of operations and cash flows for
Dearborn Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiary for the year ended December 31, 1998, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.


Detroit, Michigan
February 17, 1999
#### Eric BATES, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent.

No. 69107.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Aug. 6, 1996.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Sept. 9,1996.

Application to Transfer Denied Oct. 22,1996.

David C. Hemingway, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., David G. Brown, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial, without an evi-dentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-5079

Goodman Manufacturing Company, L.P.: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
#### DANNA, SORAGHAN, STOCKENBERG & SHAW, P.C., Respondent, v. Darwin PRICE, Appellant.

No. 64052.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Nov. 1, 1994.

Roger M. Hibbits, Clayton, for appellant.

Marcia Smith Niedringhaus, Clayton, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

*217*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Darwin Price, appeals from the St. Louis County Circuit Court’s order finding appellant liable to respondent, Danna, Soraghan, Stockenberg & Shaw, for damages for breach of contract, quantum meruit and account stated. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the decision of the trial court to be supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the trial court’s decision pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties here involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for the decision.