Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 22, 1995 / Rules and Regulations 15053

2.B.2.c of Coast Guard Commandant

Instruction M16475.1B, it is categorically excluded from further environmental documentation. Economic Assessment and Certification This regulation is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that order. It has been exempted from review

by the Office of Management and Budget under that order. It is not significant under the regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Transportation (DOT) (44 FR 11040; February 26, 1979). The Coast Guard

expects the economic impact of this

regulation to be so minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation under paragraph

10e of the regulatory policies and

procedures of the DOT is unnecessary. Collection of Information This regulation will impose no

collection of information requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 110 Anchorage grounds, Navigation

(water). Final Regulation

For the reasons set out in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR part 110 as follows: PART 110—[AMENDED] 1. The authority citation for part 110

continues to read as follows: Authority: 33 U.S.C. 471, 2030, 2035 and

2071; 49 CFR 1.46 and 33 CFR 1.05–1(g). Section 110.1a and all subsections

thereunder are also issued under 33 U.S.C. 1223 and 1231. 2. In part 110, a new § 110.77b is added to read as follows: § 110.77b Madeline Island, WI. The water are in La Pointe Harbor, Madeline Island, Wisconsin, enclosed

by: Latitude Longitude 46°46.3′ N ........ 090°47.1′ W, to

46°46.6′ N ........ 090°47.2′ W, to

46°46.7′ N ........ 090°47.2′ W, thence

along the natural shoreline and structures to: 46°46.3′ N ........ 090°47.1′ W. Dated: March 8, 1995. Rudy K. Peschel, Rear Admiral, Coast Guard, Commander, Ninth Coast Guard District. [FR Doc. 95–6955 Filed 3–21–95; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–14–M

33 CFR Part 165

[CGD13–95–002] Safety Zone Regulation: Bremerton, Washington, to Queets, Washington AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT. ACTION: Temporary final rule; correction. SUMMARY: This document contains corrections to the temporary final regulations (CGD13–95–002) which were published Monday, March 6, 1995

(60 FR 12112). The regulations established a temporary safety zone

around vessels transiting from

Bremerton, Washington to Queets, Washington. EFFECTIVE DATE: March 22, 1995. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LTJG K. Paquette, c/o Captain of the Port Puget Sound, 1519 Alaskan Way South, Seattle, Washington, 98134, (206) 217–6232. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The regulations that are the subject of

these corrections established a

temporary moving safety zone around

two towing vessels and a barge

transiting from Bremerton, Washington

to Queet, Washington. The final rule

erroneously states the name of the barge

to be ‘‘NESTUCCA’’. The correct name of the barge is ‘‘EDGECUMBE’’. Need for Correction As published, the final rule contained

errors which would make the safety

zone ineffective and therefore must be

corrected. Correction of Publication Accordingly, the publication on March 6, 1995, of the temporary final rule (CGD13–95–002) which was the

subject of FR Doc. 95–5385, is corrected

as follows: 1. Beginning on page 12112 in the

first column, change ‘‘NESTUCCA’’ to

‘‘EDGECUMBE’’ wherever it appears in

the preamble. 2. In § 165.T13–002, on page 12113 in

the first column, in paragraph (a),

‘‘NESTUCCA’’ should read

‘‘EDGECUMBE’’. 3. In § 165.T13–002, on page 12113 in

the second column, in paragraph (d),

‘‘NESTUCCA’’ should read

‘‘EDGECUMBE’’. Dated: March 13, 1995. R.K. Softye, Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Puget Sound. [FR Doc. 95–6951 Filed 3–21–95; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–14–M

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[OH61–1–6381a; FRL–5175–2] Approval and Promulgation of

Implementation Plans; Ohio AGENCY: United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: The USEPA is approving, as

revisions to the ozone portion of the Ohio State Implementation Plan (SIP), through direct final procedure, Ohio’s 1990 base-year ozone precursor emissions inventory for the Toledo and Dayton ozone nonattainment areas. These emissions inventories were

submitted to satisfy a Federal requirement that States containing ozone nonattainment areas submit

inventories of actual ozone precursor emissions for the year 1990. The Ohio

ozone nonattainment areas covered by

this rulemaking are Toledo (Lucas and Wood Counties) and Dayton (Clark, Greene, Miami, and Montgomery Counties). DATES: This final rule will be effective May 22, 1995 unless an adverse

comment is received by April 21, 1995. If the effective date of this action is delayed due to adverse comments, timely notice will be published in the Federal Register. ADDRESSES: Written comments should

be mailed to: William L. MacDowell, Chief, Regulation Development Section, Air Enforcement Branch (AE–17J), USEPA, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. Copies of the State submittal and USEPA’s analysis of it are available for

inspection at the following address (It is

recommended that you contact Richard

Schleyer at (312) 353–5089 before visiting the Region 5 Office.) Regulation Development Section, Air Enforcement Branch (AE–17J), USEPA, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Schleyer, Environmental Engineer, Regulation Development Section, Air Enforcement Branch (AE–

17J), USEPA, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 353–5089. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background

Section 182(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (Act) requires States with ozone and carbon monoxide

(CO) nonattainment areas to submit a