alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 64 (Tuesday, April 4, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17059-17060]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8139]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Public Information Collection Requirement Submitted to OMB for 
Review

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

Title and Applicable OMB Control Number: DOD FAR Supplement, Part 
237.70, Mortuary Services, and the clause at 252.237-7011, Preparation 
History; OMB Control Number 0704-0231
Type of Request: Extension
Average Burden Hours Per Response: 1
Responses Per Respondent: 1
Number of Respondents: 500
Annual Burden Hours: 500
Annual Responses: 500
Needs and Uses: This information is used by (1) contracting officers to 
ensure that the contractor has properly prepared the body and (2) the 
common carrier so that the body can be shipped by that carrier 
[[Page 17060]] 
Affected Public: Business or other for-profit and Small Businesses or 
organizations
Frequency: On occasion
Respondents Obligation: Required to obtain or retain a benefit
Desk Officer: Mr. Peter N. Weiss. Written comments and recommendations 
on the proposed information collection should be sent to Mr. Weiss at 
the Office of Management and Budget, Desk Officer for DOD, Room 10236, 
New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503
DOD Clearance Officer: Mr. William P. Pearce. Written requests for 
copies of the information collection proposal should be sent to Mr. 
Pearce, WHS/DIOR, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, 
Virginia 22202-4302

    Dated: March 29, 1995.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 95-8139 Filed 4-3-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5144

Enerpac:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF A P P E A LS E LE V E N T H C IR C U IT APRI L 25 , 2006 THOMAS K. KAH N CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FO R T HE EL EV EN TH CIRC UI T

________________________ N o. 05- 1516 6 Non-A rgum ent Calendar

________________________ D. C. Dock et No. 0 5- 20 10 8- CR-P AS UNITED STAT ES OF AMERIC A,

Pl ai nt iff -Ap pe ll ee,
ve rs us JOSE M ANUEL V AZQUEZ , a.k .a. Carl os Erne st o Gu rri , Defen da nt -Ap pe ll an t.

_____________________ Appeal f rom the United State s District Court fo r the S out he rn D ist ri ct

of F lor ida

_____________________ (A pr il 25, 200 6) Befo re MAR CUS, WILSON an d P RYOR, Ci rcu it Ju dg es . PE R CU RIA M:2

Ro bin J. F ar nsw or th, a ppoi nte d c ouns el f or Jos e Ma nue l V az que z in t his dir ec t c ri m ina l a ppe al , ha s m ove d to w ith dr aw f ro m f ur the r re pr es en ta tio n of

the ap pe ll an t an d fi le d a bri ef p ur su an t t o An de rs v. Ca li fo rn ia , 386 U
. S. 738 , 87 S , Ct
. 1396 , 18 L
. E d2d 493 (1 967)
. O ur ind ep en de nt r ev ie w of

the e nti re r ec or d r ev ea ls that counsel * s a sse ssm en t of the r el at ive m er it of

the a ppe al is co rr ec t. Be ca use ind ep en de nt e xa m ina tio n of the e nti re r ec or d r ev ea ls n o a rg ua ble iss ue s of m er it, counsel * s m oti on t o w ith dr aw is GRA NTE D , a nd Vazquez * s c onvi ct ion a nd sentence are AFFIRMED.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 6472

DWIGHT LUTHER COOK , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. ( 1:18

- cv
- 01310

- CMH

- MSN )

Submitted : August 22, 2019 Decided: August 26, 2019

Before KING and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Dwight Luther Cook, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Dwight Luther Cook appe als from the district court’s order dismissing hi s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (1)(B) (2012) for failure to state a
claim . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons st ated by the district court. Cook v. United States , No. 1:18

- cv
- 01310

- CMH

- MSN (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 21 & entered Mar. 25 , 2019)

. We den y Cook’s motions for appointment of counsel and to amend the complaint. We grant Cook’s motion to amend
his informal bri ef. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                        INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
                        -----------------------------



The Board of Directors
Pillowtex Corporation:


We consent to the inclusion and incorporation by reference in the 
registration statement Nos. 33-65408, 33-84624, 33-81478 and 333-39191 on 
Form S-8 of Pillowtex Corporation and subsidiaries of our report dated 
February 5, 1998, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Pillowtex 
Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 28, 1996 and January 3, 1998, and 
the related consolidated statements of earnings, shareholders' equity, and 
cash flows and related schedule for each of the years in the three-year 
period ended January 3, 1998, which reports are included and incorporated by 
reference in the January 3, 1998 annual report on Form 10-K of Pillowtex 
Corporation and subsidiaries.

                                       /s/ KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP

                                       KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Dallas, Texas
April 3, 1998
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 64 (Tuesday, April 4, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 17093]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8341]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT ASSESSMENT COMMISSION


Meetings

    Notice is hereby given of the meetings of the Prospective Payment 
Assessment Commission on Tuesday and Wednesday, April 18-19, 1995 at 
the Madison Hotel, 15th & M Streets, Northwest, Washington, DC.
    The Full Commission will convene at 9:00 a.m. on April 18, 1995, 
and adjourn at approximately 5:00 p.m. On Wednesday, April 19, 1995, 
the meeting will convene at 9:00 a.m. and adjourn at noon. The meetings 
will be held in Executive Chambers 1, 2, and 3 each day.
    All meetings are open to the public.
Donald A. Young,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 95-8341 Filed 4-3-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-BW-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4948

Apergy ESP Systems, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
#### Benjamin EVANS, Appellant, v. SCHNEIDER NATIONAL, INC., Respondent, and Treasurer of the State of Missouri, as custodian of the Second Injury Fund.

No. 70041.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Sept. 24, 1996.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 29,1996.

Application to Transfer Denied Dec. 17,1996.

Harry J. Nichols, St. Louis, for Appellant.

*5Christopher A. Richey, St. Louis, for Respondent.

Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Benjamin Evans, appeals from the award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission finding appellant’s injuries did not arise out of and in the course of his employment as a truck driver for respondent, Schneider National, Inc., and denying compensation. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the award was supported by sufficient and competent evidence, was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, and did not erroneously declare or apply the law. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-5172

Nissan North America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 62 (Friday, March 31, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 16681]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7871]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Chemical and Transport Systems; 
Meetings

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Chemical and Transport Systems 
(#1190).
    Date and Time: April 17-18, 1995; 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Rooms 
390, 580, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Maria K. Burka, Program Director, Chemical 
Reaction Processes, CTS, Room 525 (703) 306-1371.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: Review and evaluation nominations for the NSF Microwave-
Induced Reaction Initiative Panel as part of the selection process 
for awards.
    Reasons for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. 
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: March 27, 1995.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-7871 Filed 3-30-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           6,162
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 8,600
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     38,143
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          32,281
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            31,956
<LOANS>                                        140,116
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,944
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 230,928
<DEPOSITS>                                     191,529
<SHORT-TERM>                                     3,120
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                390
<LONG-TERM>                                      7,789
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,847
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,253
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 230,928
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  6,298
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,790
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   282
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 8,370
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,775
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,090
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,280
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      120
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,530
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,953
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,953
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,480
<EPS-BASIC>                                     2.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.10
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.92
<LOANS-NON>                                        147
<LOANS-PAST>                                       184
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,851
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       60
<RECOVERIES>                                        33
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,944
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,944
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 61 (Thursday, March 30, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16486-16487]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7759]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health


Division of Research Grants; Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
Division of Research Grants Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meetings:

    Purpose/Agenda: To review individual grant applications.
    Name of SEP: Chemistry and Related Sciences.
    Date: April 7, 1995.
    Time: 1:00 p.m.
    Place: NIH, Westwood Building, Room 322, Telephone Conference.
    Contact Person: Dr. Edmund Copeland, Scientific Review Admin., 
5333 Westbard Ave., Room 322, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-7154.
    Name of SEP: Chemistry and Related Sciences.
    Date: April 14, 1995.
    Time: 1:00 p.m.
    Place: NIH, Westwood Building, Room 322, Telephone Conference.
    Contact Person: Dr. Edmund Copeland, Scientific Review Admin., 
5333 Westbard Ave., Room 322, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-7154.
    Name of SEP: Behavioral and Neurosciences.
    Date: April 21, 1995.
    Time: 9:00 a.m.
    Place: Rockefeller University, New York, NY.
    Contact Person: Dr. Kenneth Newrock, Scientific Review Admin., 
5333 Westbard Ave., Room 232, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-7123.
    Name of SEP: Clinical Sciences.
    Date: May 1, 1995.
    Time: 2:00 p.m.
    Place: NIH, Westwood Building, Room 349, Telephone Conference.
    Contact Person: Ms. Jo Pelham, Scientific Review Administrator, 
5333 Westbard Ave., Room 349, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-7254.
    The meetings will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set forth in section [[Page 16487]] 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 
5, U.S.C. Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could 
reveal confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of 
which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal 
privacy.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations imposed by 
the grant review cycle.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 24, 1995.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 95-7759 Filed 3-29-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5185 

To maintain in effect certain sanctions imposed with respect to Iraq in 

the event of a termination of the applicable declared national emergency, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 11, 2023 

Mr. CRANE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To maintain in effect certain sanctions imposed with respect 

to Iraq in the event of a termination of the applicable 

declared national emergency, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CONTINUATION OF SANCTIONS IMPOSED. 

4 Notwithstanding any termination of the national 

5 emergency declared by the finding of the President on 

6 May 22, 2003, in Executive Order 13303 (68 Fed. Reg. 

7 31929; relating to protecting the development fund for 

8 Iraq and certain other property in which Iraq has an interVerDate Sep 11 2014 20:43 Aug 29, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5185.IH H5185

tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5185 IH

1 est), including a statutory termination taking effect on or 

2 after the date of this Act— 

3 (1) no person included in the List of Specially 

4 Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons main5 tained by the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the 

6 Department of the Treasury under the ‘‘IRAQ2’’ or 

7 ‘‘IRAQ3’’ programs may be removed from such List 

8 solely as a result of such termination; and 

9 (2) no sanction imposed with respect to a per10 son described in paragraph (1) may be waived solely 

11 as a result of such termination. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with BILLS
#### Leah Marie LUKOMSKE, Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 40966.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

June 20, 1989.

C. Carl Kimbrell, Kansas City, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Jatha B. Saldowski, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before KENNEDY, C.J., and TURNAGE and GAITAN, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from suspension of driving privileges.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
#### Daniel A. MANCUSO, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE OF MISSOURI, Defendant/Appellant.

No. 65386.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.

March 14, 1995.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., James A. Chenault, III, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Mo. Dept, of Revenue, Jefferson City, for appellant.

Clifford Schwartz, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before GRIMM, C.J., and REINHARD and CARL R. GAERTNER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Director of Revenue appeals the trial court’s judgment which sustained driver’s petition to review license revocation. This appeal is governed by our supreme court’s decision in *Jackson v. Director of Revenue,*893 S.W.2d 831 (Mo. banc 1995).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).