alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5883

Scosche Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Joseph J. YEAGER, Appellant.

No. WD 47975.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

May 17, 1994.

Brian J. Gepford, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before HANNA, P.J., and BRECKENRIDGE and ELLIS, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of one count of second degree murder in violation of § 565.021.1(1), RSMo 1986 and one count of armed criminal action in violation of § 571.015.1, RSMo 1986 on which he was sentenced to consecutive terms of life imprisonment for second degree murder and thirteen years for armed criminal action.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6194

In Re: REGINALD L. FRAZIER,

Petitioner.

No. 04-6195

In Re: REGINALD L. FRAZIER,

Petitioner.

No. 04-6196

In Re: REGINALD L. FRAZIER,

Petitioner.
- 2 -

On Petitions for Writ of Coram Nobis and Writ of Habeas Corpus.

(CA-29-4; CA-02-6644-BO; CA-03-1338)

Submitted: May 28, 2004 Decided: June 30, 2004

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Petitions denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reginald L. Frazier, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

These three original proceedings, filed in this court by

Reginald L. Frazier, have been consolidated for consideration. In

No. 04-6194, Frazier seeks relief through a petition for coram

nobis, pursuant to the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651 (2000), and

the habeas corpus statute, 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). He asks for

the refund of all fines and fees paid to the North Carolina State

Bar Council, the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, and this court, along with one hundred

times those amounts as a sanction. He also requests reinstatement

of his social security benefits. As neither coram nobis nor the

§ 2254 habeas statute can provide the relief Frazier seeks, we deny

the petition. 

No. 04-6195 and No. 04-6196 seem to be untimely petitions

for rehearing of our decisions in In re Frazier, No. 03-6701, 2003

WL 21733141 (4th Cir. July 28, 2003) (unpublished), and In re

Frazier, No. 03-1382, 2003 WL 1958771 (4th Cir. Apr. 28, 2003)

(unpublished). As these final decisions are not subject to such

attack, see Fed. R. App. P. 40(a)(1), we deny the petitions.

Although we grant Frazier leave to proceed in forma

pauperis in each case, we deny his motions for writ of coram nobis

and writ of habeas corpus. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
- 4 -

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

 PETITIONS DENIED
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4838

Scosche Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4923 

To allow certain veterans to use high occupancy vehicle lanes, including 

toll lanes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 26, 2023 

Ms. MALLIOTAKIS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To allow certain veterans to use high occupancy vehicle lanes, 

including toll lanes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘HOV Lanes for Heroes 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. HOV FACILITIES. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 166(b) of title 23, United 

8 States Code, is amended by inserting at the end the fol9 lowing: 

10 ‘‘(6) DISABLED VETERANS.— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4923 IH

1 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The public authority 

2 may allow a disabled veteran to use the HOV 

3 facility if such veteran has a license plate that 

4 clearly identifies the vehicle, a registered trans5 ponder, or other method of identification the 

6 public authority considers necessary for quali7 fication. 

8 ‘‘(B) DEFINITION OF DISABLED VET9 ERAN.—For purposes of this paragraph, the 

10 term ‘disabled veteran’ means a veteran (as 

11 such term is defined in section 101 of title 38) 

12 who the Secretary of Veterans Affairs has de13 termined has a service-connected (as such term 

14 is defined in such section) disability rated at or 

15 above a percentage determined to be qualifying 

16 by the public authority. 

17 ‘‘(C) OCCUPANCY EXCEPTION.—Notwith18 standing the occupancy requirement of sub19 section (a)(2), 1 occupant described in subpara20 graph (B) of this paragraph may be permitted 

21 to use a HOV facility. 

22 ‘‘(D) NO CHARGE FOR TOLLS.—Under this 

23 paragraph, a public authority may charge no 

24 toll.’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4923 IH

1 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 166 of 

2 such title is further amended— 

3 (1) in subsection (b)(1) by striking ‘‘through 

4 (5)’’ and inserting ‘‘through (6)’’; and 

5 (2) in subsection (d)(1) by striking ‘‘paragraph 

6 (4) or (5)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraph (4), (5), or 

7 (6)’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### Michael Leroy BEARS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 40528.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Dec. 6, 1988.

Jim Lynn, Columbia, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before FENNER, P.J., and MANFORD and GAITAN, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from denial, after evidentiary hearing, of Rule 27.26 motion for post-conviction relief.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED. Rule 84.-16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 58 (Monday, March 27, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 15682-15683]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7217]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SELECTIVE SERVICE SYSTEM

32 CFR Part 1690


Selective Service Regulations; Post Employment Conflict of 
Interest

AGENCY: Selective Service System.

ACTION: Fianl rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: 32 CFR part 1690--Post Employment Conflict of Interest is 
being removed from the Code of Federal Regulations because it has been 
made obsolete by the revocation of 5 CFR part 737 and the issuance by 
the United States Office of Government Ethics of 5 [[Page 15683]] CFR 
part 2641--Post-Employment Conflict of Interest Restrictions.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 27, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Henry N. Williams, General Counsel, Selective Service System, 1515 
Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22209-2425. Phone (703) 235-2050.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Administrative Procedure Act

    Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553 (b) and (d), I find good cause exists for 
waiving the general notice of proposed rulemaking and 30-day delay in 
effectiveness as to this rule. The notice and delayed effective date 
are being waived because the removal of 32 CFR part 1690 is indicated 
by 1 CFR part 8 because it is obsolete.

Executive Order 12866

    In promulgating this rule, I have adhered to the regulatory 
philosophy and the applicable principles of regulation set forth in 
section 1 of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review. 
This amendment has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and 
Budget under that Executive order, as it is not deemed ``significant'' 
thereunder.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    I certify under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) 
that this rulemaking will not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    The Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35) does not apply 
because this rulemaking does not contain information collection 
requirements that require the approval of the Office of Management and 
Budget.

List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 1690

    Conflict of interests, Government employees.


    Dated: March 16, 1995.
Gil Coronado,
Director of Selective Service.

PART 1690--[REMOVED AND RESERVED]

    For the reasons set out in the preamble, and under the authority of 
Title V, sec. 501(a), Pub. L. 95-521, as amended, 92 Stat. 1864; and 
secs. 1 and 2, Pub. L. 96-28, 93 Stat. 76 (18 U.S.C. 207); and 5 CFR 
part 737, part 1690 is removed and reserved.

[FR Doc. 95-7217 Filed 3-24-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8015-01-M
Exhibit 99.4

 

The undersigned, being an officer of Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee (the "Trustee"), with respect to Merrill Lynch Municipal ABS, Inc. Prerefunded Municipal Certificates, Series 2 and Series 3, on whose behalf Merrill Lynch Municipal ABS Inc. has prepared this annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 26, 2008 (the "Annual Report"), certifies as            follows:

 

1. The Trustee is the trustee under the trust agreement.

 

2. Based on my knowledge, for the periods included in the year covered by the Annual Report, the Trustee has fulfilled its obligations, including any servicing obligations, under the trust agreement.

 

   /s/   Scott Thiel         

Name: Scott Thiel            Title: Director            Date:  March 10, 2009

----
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

August 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4418

David C. Poole Company:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5636

Alo USA Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5091 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5091

  To require the Secretary of Agriculture to annually publish certain 
     data with respect to grape production, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 28, 2023

Ms. Tenney (for herself and Mr. Morelle) introduced the following bill; 
           which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the Secretary of Agriculture to annually publish certain 
     data with respect to grape production, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fairness in Vineyard Data Act''.

SEC. 2. GRAPE PRODUCTION DATA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Agriculture, acting through the 
Administrator of the National Agricultural Statistics Service, shall--
            (1) not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment 
        of this Act--
                    (A) conduct a survey on grape production in each 
                State, including--
                            (i) total acreage; and
                            (ii) production, utilization, and acreage 
                        by type, variety, county, and year planted; and
                    (B) make publicly available on the website of the 
                National Agricultural Statistics Service the results of 
                such survey and the data from such survey; and
            (2) not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment 
        of this Act and annually for the 3 years thereafter, make 
        publicly available on the website of the National Agricultural 
        Statistics Service data from the 5 States with the highest 
        grape production in the preceding year, as determined using 
        data from the survey required under paragraph (1)(A).
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--
            (1) Survey.--There is authorized to be appropriated to 
        carry out subparagraphs (A) and (B) of subsection (a)(1) 
        $2,500,000 for fiscal year 2024.
            (2) Publication of data.--There is authorized to be 
        appropriated to carry out subsection (a)(2) $1,500,000 for each 
        of fiscal years 2025 through 2028.
                                 <all>
```
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3243

BorgWarner, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Universal Capital Management, Inc.
      (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Joseph T. Drennan, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my
      knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/
              Joseph T.
              DrennanJoseph
                T. Drennan
              Treasurer
                (Principal Financial Officer)
              March
                19, 2007




The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and shall not be deemed
      filed
      by the Company for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act
      of
      1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to liability under that Section.
      This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into
      any
      filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act except to the extent
      that this certification is expressly incorporated by reference into any such
      filing.
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**STATEMENTOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q/A for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 (the “Form 10-Q/A”)of Cardinal Financial Corporation, I, Bernard H. Clineburg, Chairman, Presidentand Chief Executive Officer, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to my knowledge:

 

(a)                                  the Form 10-Q/A fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended; and

 

(b)                                 the information contained in the Form10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financialcondition and results of operations of the Company and its subsidiaries as of,and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q/A.

 

 
| Date: February 1, 2005 | /s/ Bernard H. Clineburg       |   |
|------------------------|--------------------------------|--------|
|                   | Bernard H.  Clineburg          |
|                   | Chairman,  President and Chief |
|                   | Executive  Officer             |

 

----