alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Michael D. Queen, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Universal Capital Management, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  March 16, 2010
Exhibit 32.1








Certification
of CEO Pursuant to


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


as
Adopted Pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of GAMCO Investors, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Mario J.
Gabelli, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Mario J.
Gabelli


Name:
Mario J. Gabelli


Title:   Chief
Executive Officer


Date:   August
7, 2008





This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Horace SCOTT, Appellant, Horace SCOTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. WD 48437, WD 50636.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Jan. 9, 1996.

James C. Cox, Asst. Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, Asst. Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before FENNER, C.J., P.J., and SPINDEN and SMITH, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

*ORDER*

Appeal from conviction, after jury trial, of one count of burglary in the second degree, § 569.170, RSMo 1994, one count felony stealing over $150, § 570.030, RSMo 1994, and sentence as prior and persistent offender, §§ 558.016, RSMo 1994 and 557.036.4, RSMo 1994, to concurrent terms of ten years imprisonment on both counts.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Music International, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Corinne Fallacaro, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materials respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |                        
|------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 10, 2005 |  | /s/ Corinne Fallacaro  
|                   |  | Corinne Fallacaro      
|                   |  | Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Conceptus, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

(i) the
accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for twelve months ended December 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 15, 2011



|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ GREGORY E. LICHTWARDT                                                            
|Gregory E. Lichtwardt
Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief
Financial Officer
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333–08837,333–33231, 333–36071, 333–57488, 333–90104, 333–116341, 33–84116, 33–84118, 33–84120, 33–84122 and 33–84124), S-3 (File Nos. 333-77399, 333–90102, 333–58110, 333–116342 and33–70618) and S-3/A (Nos. 333–58110 and 333-116342) of our reports dated March 2, 2005, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Gateway Inc. and management’s report on the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Gateway Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2004. 

 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

 

Costa Mesa, California 

March 2, 2005
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 6812

CHARLES WALKER , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro

. Thomas D. Schroeder , Chief District Judge. ( 1:19

- cv
- 00282

- TDS

- JLW )

Submitted : October 15, 2019 Decided: October 18, 2019

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and THACKER and RUSHING , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Charles Walker, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Charles Walker appeals the dis trict court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying Walker’s petition for a writ of error coram nobis. We
have reviewed the record and fin d no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the distric t cou rt. Walker v. United States , No. 1:19

- cv
- 00282

- TDS

- JLW (M.D.N.C. May 7, 2019)

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decision al process.
AFFIRMED
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-5450

Radio Systems Corp: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
Exhibit 32.2

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Killbuck Bancshares, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Diane Knowles, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (3) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                     
|----------------------- |  | --------------------
|By:                     |  | /s/ Diane S. Knowles
|Diane S. Knowles       
|Chief Financial Officer
|August 11, 2008        

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Killbuck Bancshares,
Inc. and will be retained by Killbuck Bancshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           7,966
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   97,717
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,895
<INVENTORY>                                    113,143
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               232,564
<PP&E>                                         476,274
<DEPRECIATION>                                 153,160
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 643,616
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          126,934
<BONDS>                                        363,882
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              130
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      96,655
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   643,616
<SALES>                                        761,429
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               761,429
<CGS>                                          669,772
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  699,903
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,034
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   430
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,387
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 29,675
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,674
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,001
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  5,250
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,751
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $0.90
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.90
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO **

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350, **

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1. | The                Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section                13(a) or                15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in                all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operation                of the                Company. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| */s/                Darren Stevenson**Darren                Stevenson**President,                Chief Executive**Officer                and acting in his**capacity**as                the principal accounting**officer* *Date:                June 16, 2006*   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report ofBulldog Financial, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended February 28, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Scott McDowell, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated this 23rd day of April, 2007.



| | SCOTT MCDOWELL                                     
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Scott McDowell                                     
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer













---
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2954

Price Pump Company:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
#### Barnes *et al. v.*Banks *et al.*

Fish, C. J.

A bank sued A and B as makers, and C and D as indorsers on several promissory notes given by A and B to C and D for the balance of the purchase-price of certain machinery. The payees in the notes, O and D, indorsed them to the bank. The action was brought in the superior court of Jones county, where the petition alleged they resided. It was further alleged that one of the indorsers was a resident of Fulton county, and the other resided in DeKalb county. The makers answered, and at the trial term the case was continued as to the bank and the makers. The makers filed a *“*cross-petition,” the material substance of which was to the effect, that they purchased from the indorsers certain described machinery, paid to them a part of the purchase-price, and gave them the notes sued on; that there was a breach of warranty on the part of the indorsers, in that the machinery was not as represented by the indorsers, and was not reasonably suited for the purposes intended, and that the indorsers failed to deliver it within the time specified in the agreement between the makers and indorsers, and that the makers were thereby damaged in a -specified amount, and that the machinery was nothing like as valuable as the indorsers had represented it to be; and a judgment was prayed against the indorsers for the amount of the purchase-money paid, and for damages. This *“*cross-petition ” was dismissed upon motion of the indorsers, on the ground, among others, that the superior court of Jones county had no jurisdiction to entertain such an action as set out in the “ cross-petition ” against them, as neither of them resided in that county. *Held,*that the court did not err in dismissing the “ cross-petition.” Under the constitution an action must be brought in the county of the defendant’s residence, and neither of the indorsers, who were the defendants in the “ cross-petition,” resided in Jones county. While they could be sued *707there with the makers of the notes, because they were joint obligors, the makers could not maintain in that county the “ cross-petition *”*against them-. *Judgment affirmed.*

No. 3010.

December 22, 1922.

Complaint. Before Judge Park. Jones superior court. October 18, 1921.

*F. Holmes Johnson*and *B. B.*Blackburn, for plaintiffs in error.

*Joseph F. Poltle*and *Charles J. Haden,*contra.

*All the Justices concur.*
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5219

Schindler Elevator Corporation:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel