alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5103 

AN ACT 

To require the Director of the Office of Management and 

Budget to approve or deny spend plans within a certain 

amount of time, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5103 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fishery Improvement 

3 to Streamline untimely regulatory Hurdles post Emer4 gency Situation Act’’ or the ‘‘FISHES Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. SPEND PLANS. 

6 Section 312(a)(6) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery 

7 Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 

8 1861a(a)(6)) is amended— 

9 (1) in subparagraph (D), to read as follows: 

10 ‘‘(D) SPEND PLANS.— 

11 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—To receive an allo12 cation from funds available under para13 graph (9), a requester with an affirmative 

14 fishery resource disaster determination 

15 shall submit a spend plan to the Secretary, 

16 not more than 120 days after receiving no17 tification that funds are available, that 

18 shall include the following information, if 

19 applicable: 

20 ‘‘(I) Objectives and outcomes, 

21 with an emphasis on addressing the 

22 factors contributing to the fishery re23 source disaster and minimizing future 

24 uninsured losses, if applicable. 

25 ‘‘(II) Statement of work. 

26 ‘‘(III) Budget details. 
3 

•HR 5103 EH

1 ‘‘(ii) REVIEW.— 

2 ‘‘(I) IN GENERAL.—The Sec3 retary shall review a spend plan sub4 mitted under clause (i) to determine if 

5 it is complete and provide notice with6 in 10 days. 

7 ‘‘(II) INCOMPLETE SPEND

8 PLAN.—If the Secretary determines 

9 that a spend plan submitted under 

10 clause (i) is not complete, when pro11 viding the notice required by sub12 clause (I), the Secretary shall provide 

13 a detailed description of the informa14 tion that is necessary for the spend 

15 plan to be determined complete.’’; and 

16 (2) in subparagraph (F)(i), to read as follows: 

17 ‘‘(i) AVAILABILITY.— 

18 ‘‘(I) TIMELINE.—Funds shall be 

19 made available to grantees not later 

20 than 90 days after the date the Sec21 retary receives a complete spend plan. 

22 ‘‘(II) REVIEW OF COMPLETED

23 SPEND PLAN AND APPORTIONMENT

24 OF FUNDS.—If so requested, the Di25 rector of the Office of Management 
4 

•HR 5103 EH

1 and Budget may review a completed 

2 spend plan concurrently with the Sec3 retary. The Director of the Office of 

4 Management and Budget may not 

5 delay the timeline described in sub6 clause (I).’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 3, 

2024. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5103 

AN ACT 

To require the Director of the Office of Managepurposes. within a certain amount of time, and for other ment and Budget to approve or deny spend plans
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 13, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2195

Hach Company:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6197

Dallas Airmotive, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      10,239,735
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  190,044
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    557,182
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,104,183
<PP&E>                                      90,675,681
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,310,295
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             101,079,942
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,284,996
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,110
<OTHER-SE>                                  36,494,441
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               101,079,942
<SALES>                                      3,853,815
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            92,821,505
<CGS>                                        1,804,047
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               76,622,347
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,767,717
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,287,645
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              8,351,798
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,929,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,422,798
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,422,798
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.30


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Rick Wilson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Blacksands Petroleum, Inc., for the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Blacksands Petroleum, Inc.

 

 

| Date:   September 15, 2008 | By:    /s/ Rick Wilson                                                      |
|--------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 |           Rick Wilson, Principal Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |  
 

 

 

  |
Exhibit
      32.1






**CERTIFICATE
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICERS**




This
      Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of Section 1350
      of
      Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal Procedures) of the
      United States Code and shall not be relied on by any person for any other
      purpose.




The
      undersigned, who are the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
      of
      Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT I, Inc. (the “Company”), each hereby certify
      as follows:




The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company (the “Report”), which accompanies
      this Certificate, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and all
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated
      this 14th day of November, 2005.


/s/ Robert
              M. BehringerRobert
              M. Behringer, Chief Executive
              Officer


/s/ Gary
              S. BreskyGary
              S. Bresky, Chief Financial
              Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the
      registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.






24
EXHIBIT 23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-163648, 333-163510 and 333-167409) and Form S-8 (File Nos. 033-62788, 033-83406, 333-39413, 333-58542 and 333-122343) of Repros Therapeutics Inc. of our report dated March 28, 2011 relating to the financial statements which appears in this Form 10-K.





/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPHouston, TexasMarch 28, 2011





Exhibit 23.1
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 19
- 00902
- CV

Yevgenia Shockome, Appellant

v. Kyle Cowand, Appellee

FROM THE 459TH DISTR ICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D
- 1
- GN
- 19
- 003849 , THE HONORABLE TIM SULAK, JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Yev genia Shock ome , appearin g pro se, seeks to appeal an interl ocutory
order si gned by the trial court on November 22, 2019, which granted a motion to dismiss filed by
one of the defe ndants , Kyle Cowand. See Tex. R. C iv . P. 91a.

On February 3, 20 20 , the Clerk of this Court sent notice to Shock ome that it

appea r s that this Court lacks jurisdiction over her appeal because the jurisdiction of this Court is generally limited to the review of final judgment s and certai n int erlocutory orders as authorized by statute. 1 S ee Lehmann v. Har

- Con Corp ., 39 S.W.3d 191, 19 5 (Tex. 2001) ; see also De Ayala
v. Mackie , 193 S.W.3d 575, 578

- 79 (Tex. 2006) (explaining test for determining finality of order

1 Shockome has filed two other appeals, assigned cause number 03

- 19

- 0090 3

- CV and cause nu mber 03

- 19

- 00904

- CV in th is C ourt

. I n those appeals, arising from the se same trial court proc eedings , Shock ome challenges additional trial c ourt orders dismissing other defendants fro m her suit. Even considering the trial court ’ s dismissals as to these other defendants, no final ju d gment e x i sts because additional d efendants remai n in the proceedings below

. See Leh mann v. Har

- Con Corp. , 39 S.W.3d 191, 205 (Tex. 2001) (explaining that judgment is not final unless it d isposes of all pending claims and parties).2

in context of probate cases)

. The Clerk asked Shockome to respond in writing and explain how
this Co u rt m ay e x ercise jurisdiction over this appeal.

Shock ome has filed a res ponse requesting that we pe rmit her to proceed in this appeal because the trial court ’ s partial dismissal “ fatally affect s her ability to prove her cons piracy
claims on the remaini n g defe nd a nts. ” Sho ck ome ’ s respons e f ails to identify a final judgment or statutory auth ority for reviewing the interlocut or y order from which she seeks relief. See Lehmann , 39 S.W.3d at 195. Because Shockome has failed to demonstrate this Cour t ’ s ju ris d iction o v er

t h is appeal , we di smiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P . 42.3(a).

__________________________________________ C hari L. Kelly , Justice
Before Justices Goodwin, Kelly, and Smith
Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
F iled: February 2 8, 2020
|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Registrant. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                                          |   |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ David              Salzman                                                                                                           |   |   |   |
| David              Salzman                                                                                                                    |   |   |        |
| Chief                Executive Officer of Richman AmericanCredit                Corp., Manager of the RegistrantMarch                12, 2008 |   |   |   |

----
Exhibit 12.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Raya Asher, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Magal Security System
Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
Subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [Reserved]

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: June 30, 2005

/s/Raya Asher*
--------------
Raya Asher
Chief Financial Officer
* The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the
Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4603

Apergy ESP Systems, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
PUBLIC VERSION
$[*********] [******]

$[*********]

INPUT

20.0

$[*********]

[******]

[******]

0.05

PUBLIC VERSION
Consistent with USTR's Section 301 notice, OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. requests

confidential treatment for the information designated as business confidential in this submission. Such

information consists of information that would not customarily be released to the public, including

business or trade secrets regarding production costs and processes, data on sales, product characteristics

customers, destinations, and other product, sales, and cost-related business secrets. Business confidential

information has been indicated herein by enclosing it in single brackets (“[ ]”). A public version of these

comments is also being filed with all confidential information removed.

OMRON in the US is the only designer of this product and only supplier of this component.

ACCESSORY SWITCH KNOB,ACSW is a molded plastic switch knob, and is used only for automotive

purposes as a switch for a motor to fold a seat. It is only used for further assembly of components which

go into domestic automobile production. which is specified by auto manufacturer.

This product is not a target of the US Administration's 301 investigation regarding Intellectual Property

concerns. This is not a concern to IP transfer and impressment. This product contains no IP of interest

related to autonomous vehicle production.

The tariff action ultimately poses a risk of significant damage to OMRON, the domestic

automobile industry, and ultimately the US consumer as a

increase in price. Like in the case of similar approvals for vehicle components at the HTS

level, OMRON views this product in the same manner. Immediate movement of production to a US

manufacturer or another country would pose significant re-tooling costs, significant

amounts of time, and approvals pertaining to consumer automobile safety standards are costly and would

take a significant amount of time to

obtain.

OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. believes that CBP can easily exclude the ACCESSORY

SWITCH KNOB,ACSW in question based solely on the product description. The following are draft

CBP exclusion instructions:

"ACCESSORY SWITCH KNOB,ACSW rectangular switch face with a tapered wedge profile; image of

a seat collapsing forward on the front face "Plastic knob for Accessory Switch - Made of plastic resin

-PC CLR(Seat Fold knob). Dimensions are 34.07mm X 17.97mm X 12.00 mm"

This information will be contained on the invoice from the supplier

PUBLIC VERSION
EXHIBIT 23.1


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
              ----------------------------------------------------


     We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  registration  statements
(No.  33-70478 and  333-62245) on Form S-8 and (No.  333-12893 and 333-47621) on
Form S-3 of Prime  Medical  Services,  Inc.  of our report  dated March 1, 1999,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Prime Medical Services,  Inc. and
subsidiaries  as of  December  31, 1998 and 1997,  and the related  consolidated
statements of income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year  period ended  December 31, 1998,  which report appears in the
Annual  Report on Form 10-K of Prime Medical  Services,  Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 1998.


/s/ KPMG LLP
--------------------------
Austin, Texas
March 30, 1999