14980 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 54 / Tuesday, March 21, 1995 / Notices

1995 refueling outage. In addition, not

performing the test during this outage

will reduce the occupational radiation

exposure which is consistent with as

low as reasonable achievable goal of the

licensee’s Radiation Protection Program.

Environmental Impacts of the Proposed

Action

The Commission has completed its

evaluation of the proposed action and

concludes that the one-time interval

extension between the first and second

Type A tests and the extension of the

10-year service period to 12 years would

not increase the probability or

consequences of accidents previously

analyzed and the proposed exemptions

would not affect facility radiation levels

or facility radiological effluents. The

licensee has analyzed the results of

previous Type A tests performed at CC2.

Although the first test was not

successful,the licensee promptly

identified and corrected the problems.

As a result, the last three tests have been

successful and have demonstrated good

containment performance. The licensee

will continue to be required to conduct

the Type B and C local leak rate tests

which, subsequent to the prompt

corrective actions following the initial

Type A test, have been shown to be the

principal means of detecting

containment leakage paths with the

Type A tests confirming the Type B and

C test results. It is also noted that the

licensee, as a condition of the proposed

exemptions, will perform the visual

containment inspection although it is

only required by Appendix J to be

conducted in conjunction with Type A

tests. The NRC staff considers that these

inspections, though limited in scope,

provide an important added level of

confidence in the continued integrity of

the containment boundary. The change

will not increase the probability or

consequences of accidents, no changes

are being made in the types of any

effluents that may be released offsite,

and there is no significant increase in

the allowable individual or cumulative

occupational radiation exposure.

Accordingly, the Commission concludes

that there are no significant radiological

environmental impacts associated with

the proposed action.

With regard to potential

nonradiological impacts, the proposed

action does involve features located

entirely within the restricted area as

defined in 10 CFR Part 20. It does not

affect nonradiological plant effluents

and has no other environmental impact.

Accordingly, the Commission concludes

that there are no significant

nonradiological environmental impacts

associated with the proposed action.

Alternatives to the Proposed Action

Since the Commission has concluded

there is no measurable environmental

impact associated with the proposed

action, any alternatives with equal or

greater environmental impact need not

be evaluated. As an alternative to the

proposed action, the NRC staff

considered denial of the proposed

action. Denial of the application would

result in no change in current

environmental impacts.

Alternative Use of Resources

This action does not involve the use

of any resources not previously

considered in the Final Environmental

Statement for the Calvert Cliffs Nuclear

Power Plant, Unit No. 2.

Agencies and Persons Consulted

In accordance with its stated policy,

the NRC staff consulted with the

Maryland State official regarding the

environmental impact of the proposed

action. The State official had no

comments.

Finding of No Significant Impact

Based upon the environmental

assessment, the Commission concludes

that the proposed action will not have

a significant effect on the quality of the

human environment. Accordingly, the

Commission has determined not to

prepare an environmental impact

statement for the proposed action.

For further details with respect to the

proposed action, see the licensee’s letter

dated February 24, 1995, which is

available for public inspection at the

Commission’s Public Document Room,

The Gelman Building, 2120 L Street

NW., Washington, DC, and at the local

public document room located at the

Calvert County Library, Prince

Frederick, Maryland 20678.

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 15th day

of March, 1995.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Ledyard B. Marsh,

Director, Project Directorate I–1, Division of

Reactor Projects—I/II, Office of Nuclear

Reactor Regulation.

[FR Doc. 95–6877 Filed 3–20–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590–01–M

Advisory Committee on Reactor

Safeguards Subcommittee Meeting on

Planning and Procedures; Notice of

Meeting

The ACRS Subcommittee on Planning

and Procedures will hold a meeting on

April 5, 1995, Room T–2B1, 11545

Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland.

The entire meeting will be open to

public attendance, with the exception of

a portion that may be closed pursuant

to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (2) and (6) to discuss

organizational and personnel matters

that relate solely to internal personnel

rules and practices of ACRS, and

matters the release of which would

constitute a clearly unwarranted

invasion of personal privacy.

The agenda for the subject meeting

shall be as follows:

Wednesday, April 5, 1995—2:00 p.m. Until

the Conclusion of Business

The Subcommittee will discuss proposed

ACRS activities and related matters. It will

also discuss the status of the appointment of

members to the ACRS. The purpose of this

meeting is to gather information, analyze

relevant issues and facts, and to formulate

proposed positions and actions, as

appropriate, for deliberation by the full

Committee.

Oral statements may be presented by

members of the public with the concurrence

of the Subcommittee Chairman; written

statements will be accepted and made

available to the Committee. Electronic

recordings will be permitted only during

those portions of the meeting that are open

to the public, and questions may be asked

only by members of the Subcommittee, its

consultants, and staff. Persons desiring to

make oral statements should notify the

cognizant ACRS staff person named below

five days prior to the meeting, if possible, so

that appropriate arrangements can be made.

Further information regarding topics to be

discussed, the scheduling of sessions open to

the public, whether the meeting has been

canceled or rescheduled, the Chairman’s

ruling on requests for the opportunity to

present oral statements, and the time allotted

therefore can be obtained by contracting the

cognizant ACRS staff person, Dr. John T.

Larkins (telephone: 301/415–7360) between

7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. (EST). Persons

planning to attend this meeting are urged to

contact the above named individual one or

two working days prior to the meeting to be

advised of any changes in schedule, etc., that

may have occurred.

Dated: March 15, 1995.

Sam Duraiswamy

Chief, Nuclear Reactors Branch.

[FR Doc. 95–6879 Filed 3–20–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590–01–M

OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND

BUDGET

National Information Infrastructure;

Public Meeting

AGENCY: Office of Management and

Budget.

ACTION: National Information

Infrastructure Security issues forum;

notice of public meeting and request for

public comments.

SUMMARY: The National Information

Infrastructure Security Issues Forum