alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

#### **SECTION1350 CERTIFICATIONS**

#### ** **

ThisCertificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of Section 1350 ofChapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal Procedures) of theUnited States Code and shall not be relied on by any person for any otherpurpose.

 

Theundersigned, who are the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer ofBehringer Harvard Opportunity REIT I, Inc. (the “Company”), each hereby certifyas follows:

 

TheQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company (the “Report”), which accompaniesthis Certificate, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

Datedthis 14th day of November, 2007.

 

 
|   |   | /s/  Robert M. Behringer                      |   |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Robert  M. Behringer, Chief Executive Officer |
|   |   |                                          |
|   |   |                                          |
|   |   | /s/  Gary S. Bresky                           |   |
|   |   | Gary  S. Bresky, Chief Financial Officer      |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the registrant and will beretained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
E **xhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Universal Capital
      Management, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended July 31, 2007 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, Joseph T. Drennan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, that, to my knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/
                Joseph T. DrennanJoseph
                T. Drennan
              Chief
                Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
              September
                14, 2007
Exhibit 32.1


                        Certification of CEO Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of GAMCO Investors, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Mario J.
Gabelli, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Mario J. Gabelli
--------------------
Name:  Mario J. Gabelli
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date:  April 13, 2007

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 10.2






Exhibit 10.2




Schedule Identifying Material Details of

Executive Agreements Substantially Similar to Exhibit 99.2 to Huntington’s

Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 21, 2005

As Amended by Exhibit 10.1 to Huntington’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Period

Ended September 30, 2008 and

As Amended by Exhibit 10.4 to Huntington’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Period

Ended September 30, 2009




	 	 	 
	Name	 	Effective Date
	 
	 	 
	Zahid Afzal

	 	October 21, 2009
	Elizabeth Heller Allen

	 	October 21, 2009
	Daniel B. Benhase

	 	January 1, 2006
	Kevin M. Blakely

	 	July 8, 2009
	Richard A. Cheap

	 	January 1, 2006
	James E. Dunlap

	 	January 1, 2006
	Donald R. Kimble

	 	January 1, 2006
	Mary W. Navarro

	 	January 1, 2006
	Daniel J. Neumeyer

	 	October 21, 2009
	Keith D. Sanders

	 	April 22,2010
	Nicholas G. Stanutz

	 	January 1, 2006
	Randall G. Stickler

	 	April 16, 2009
	Mark E. Thompson

	 	April 20, 2009
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.3

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-11067, 333-15907, 333-17021, 333-23035,
333-37247, 333-37383, 333-41603, 333-58045, 333-68505, 333-76379, 333-76757,
333-82569, 333-84419, 333-88813, 333-88819, 333-91621 and 333-82134) and the
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-79372, 333-07241, 333-11237,
333-28449, 333-74461 and 333-79737) of General Growth Properties, Inc. of our
report dated February 6, 2001 relating to the consolidated financial statements,
which appears in the Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the
incorporation by reference of our report dated February 6, 2001 relating to the
financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.

Chicago, Illinois                                   PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
March 14, 2002

                                      S-10
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of JayHawk Energy, Inc. a Colorado
corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31,
2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), Lindsay E. Gorrill, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and





(2)
            The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and result of operations of the
Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
JayHawk Energy, Inc., and will be retained by JayHawk Energy, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.











By:/s/
Lindsay E. Gorrill


Lindsay
Gorrill


Chief
Executive Officer


February
13, 2008
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5810

Magna Electronics: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_05.09.19.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DAVID CLARK,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF HAWAII,

INC.; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 10-15126

D.C. No. 1:09-cv-00184-DAELEK

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Hawaii

David Alan Ezra, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 15, 2011** 

Before: CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

David Clark appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in

his action alleging hostile work environment, discrimination, and retaliation. We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Donohue v. Quick

FILED

JUL 6 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-15126

Collect, Inc., 592 F.3d 1027, 1030 (9th Cir. 2010), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment on the hostile work

environment claim based on Clark’s coworker’s single e-mail because the EEOC

charge was filed more than 300 days after the incident. See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e5(e); Nat’l R.R. Passenger Corp. v. Morgan, 536 U.S. 101, 118 (2002) (for an

EEOC charge of hostile work environment to be timely, the employee must file the

charge within the statutory time period of any act that forms the hostile work

environment). Moreover, even if Clark’s EEOC charge had been timely as to this

claim, the district court properly concluded that the e-mail “was neither severe nor

pervasive enough to alter the conditions of [his] employment.” Manatt v. Bank of

Am., 339 F.3d 792, 799 (9th Cir. 2003).

The district court properly granted summary judgment on the discrimination

claim because Clark failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether

defendant’s legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons for its adverse employment

actions were a pretext for discrimination. See Leong v. Potter, 347 F.3d 1117,

1124-25 (9th Cir. 2003). 

The district court properly granted summary judgment on the retaliation

claim because Clark failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether

there was a causal link between his alleged protected activity and his termination. 
3 10-15126

See Cohen v. Fred Meyer, Inc., 686 F.2d 793, 796-97 (9th Cir. 1982) (there is no

causal link if the decisionmaker is unaware of the protected activity).

Clark’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive. 

Clark’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied.

AFFIRMED.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

April 12, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4546

ECM Industries LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_04.15.19.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
#### La Vonne L. Mack, Appellant, v John A. Stewart, Jr., et al., Constituting the Village of Fayetteville Planning Board, et al., Respondents.

Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Tait, J. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Tait, J.—art 78.) Present— Dillon, P. J., Boomer, Pine, Davis and Lowery, JJ.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JOSHUA PEREZ-RIVERA, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-1737

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed June 7, 2019. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Samantha L. Ward, 

Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and 

Warren A. Zimmerman, Special Assistant 

Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Johnny T. Salgado, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for 

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

CASANUEVA, KELLY, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David Lawson, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. *963Memorandum: There is no merit to defendant’s contention that reversible error was committed when the court commenced a second felony offender hearing in his absence. At the outset of the hearing, defense counsel observed that he did not know why defendant was absent, made no request for an adjournment, and instead, proceeded to make a legal argument in support of defendant’s position. Défendant appeared a few minutes later. The court recessed to enable defendant’s counsel to apprise defendant of the argument that had been made in his absence. Thereafter, counsel indicated that the defendant reaffirmed the argument that had been made in his absence. We conclude that, by ratifying the acts of his attorney performed during his absence, defendant waived his right to be present throughout the proceeding *(see, People v Windley,*134 AD2d 386).

We have reviewed the remaining issues raised by defendant and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Marshall, J.—sexual abuse, first degree.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Green and Balio, JJ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of : No. 6 4 DB 2022 (No. 28 RST 2022)

:

MICHAEL A. POREDA : Attorney Registration No. 323382

:

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT :

FROM ADMINISTRATIVE SUSPENSION : ( Out of State )

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 23 rd day of June

, 202 2 , the Report and Recommendation of

Disciplinary Board Member dated June 15 , 2022

, is approved and it is ORDERED that

MICHAEL A. POREDA

, who has been on Administrative Suspension

, has never been

suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications,

competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth,

shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this

Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing

of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4957 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4957

 To apply the requirements of the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998 
  to a vacancy in the office of the Secretary of Labor, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 2023

  Mr. Kiley (for himself and Ms. Foxx) introduced the following bill; 
   which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To apply the requirements of the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998 
  to a vacancy in the office of the Secretary of Labor, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Department of Labor Succession 
Act''.

SEC. 2. APPLYING VACANCIES ACT TO VACANCY IN OFFICE OF SECRETARY OF 
              LABOR.

    Section 1 of the Act of April 17, 1946 (60 Stat. 91; 29 U.S.C. 552) 
is amended by striking the second and third sentences and inserting the 
following: ``The Deputy Secretary is authorized to exercise the 
functions and perform the duties of the first assistant of the 
Secretary of Labor within the meaning of section 3345 of title 5, 
United States Code, and shall perform such other duties as may be 
required by law or prescribed by the Secretary of Labor.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



Section 1350 Certification





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of 024 Pharma, Inc. (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2017, as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certify,
pursuant to and solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



1.  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



2.  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.





|Date:
    April 11, 2017 | By: | /s/Miro Zecevic             | 
|------------------------ | --- | --------------------------- | 
|                         |     | Miro Zecevic                | 
|                         |     | Chief Executive Officer and | 
|                         |     | Chief
    Financial Officer |
EXHIBIT 12

                  PRIME MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
        FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, 1998, 1997, 1996 and 1995

<TABLE>
<S>                                           <C>             <C>            <C>             <C>            <C>
                                                                       Years Ended December 31,
                                                 1999            1998           1997            1996           1995
                                              ------------    ------------   ------------    ------------   ------------

Income before income taxes
     and after minority interests                 $24,471         $18,171        $20,651         $10,957        $ 8,090

Undistributed equity income                          (583)           (102)          (408)              -           (299)

Minority interest income of subsidiaries
     with fixed charges                             3,726           1,823          6,074           7,000              -
                                              ------------    ------------   ------------    ------------   ------------

Adjusted earnings                                  27,614          19,892         26,317          17,957          7,791
                                              ------------    ------------   ------------    ------------   ------------

Interest on debt                                    9,408           8,469          7,477           5,977          1,231

Debt issuance costs                                   566           4,978            360           2,735              -
                                              ------------    ------------   ------------    ------------   ------------

Total fixed charges                                 9,974          13,447          7,837           8,712          1,231
                                              ------------    ------------   ------------    ------------   ------------

Total available earnings
     before fixed charges                         $37,588         $33,339        $34,154         $26,669        $ 9,022
                                              ============    ============   ============    ============   ============

Ratio                                                 3.8             2.5            4.4             3.1            7.3
                                              ============    ============   ============    ============   ============
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of CEO

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section
1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Gateway, Inc., a Delaware corporation (Gateway), does hereby certify that:



a) The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
quarter ended December 31, 2004 (the Form 10-K) of Gateway fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



b) The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Gateway.



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |     |  |                                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------
|Dated: March 3, 2005 |  |  |  | 
|                     |  |  |  | 
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    WAYNE R. INOUYE                 
|                     |  |  |  |  |  |     |  | Wayne R. Inouye Chief Executive Officer