alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 55 (Wednesday, March 22, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15152]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7077]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Notice of Receipt of Applications for Approval

    The following applicants have applied for approval to conduct 
certain activities with birds that are protected in accordance with the 
Wild Bird Conservation Act of 1992. This notice is provided pursuant to 
Section 112(4) of the Wild Bird Conservation Act of 1992, 50 CFR 
15.26(c).
    Applicant: Dan L. Pike, Edmonds, WA. The applicant wishes to amend 
his approved cooperative breeding program to include two additional 
subspecies of peregrine falcon: Falco peregrinus babylonicus, and Falco 
peregrinus peregrinator. Two private individuals will be an actively 
participating in this program. The Washington Falconers Association 
maintains responsibility for the oversight of the program.
    Written data or comments should be submitted to the Director, U.S. 
Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Management Authority, 4401 North 
Fairfax Drive, Room 420C, Arlington, Virginia 22203 and must be 
received by the Director within 30 days of the date of this 
publication.
    Documents and other information submitted with these applications 
are available for review, subject to the requirements of the Privacy 
Act and Freedom of Information Act, by any party who submits a written 
request for a copy of such documents to the following office within 30 
days of the date of publication of this notice: U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service, Office of Management Authority, 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Room 
420C, Arlington, Virginia 22203. Phone: (703/358-2104); FAX: (703/358-
2281).

    Dated: March 15, 1995.
Carol Lee Carson,
Acting Chief, Branch of Operations, Office of Management Authority.
[FR Doc. 95-7077 Filed 3-21-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 54 (Tuesday, March 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 14929]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6891]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service


Carlota Copper Project, Tonto National Forest, Gila and Pinal 
Counties, AZ

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

COOPERATING AGENCIES:
Department of Defense, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles 
District, Arizona Field Office.
Arizona Department of Environmental Quality.

ACTION: Notice of the extension of the comment period on the draft EIS.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On June 9, 1992, the USDA, Forest Service, as lead agency, 
issued a Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare an Environmental Impact 
Statement (EIS) for a proposal to develop a mine for copper extraction 
in the Pinto Creek/Powers Gulch area in the Federal Register (57 FR 
24461). The NOI indicated a 45 day period for comments on the Draft 
EIS. A Notice of Availability of the Draft EIS was published by EPA in 
the Federal Register (60 FR 6710) as EIS No. 950034, Draft EIS, AFS, 
AZ, Carlota Open-Pit Copper Mine Project on February 3, 1995. The 
Forest Service, USDA, has decided to extend the review period an 
additional 45 days.

DATES: Comments on the Draft EIS should now be received in writing by 
May 11, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Send written comments to USDA Forest Service, Tonto National 
Forest, 2324 E. McDowell Road, Phoenix, AZ 85006, Attn: Paul Stewart.

RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: The Forest Supervisor, Tonto National Forest, 
will be the responsible official and will decide on the conditions 
under which the mining operations may proceed.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Paul Stewart, Project Coordinator (602) 225-5200.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Forest Service received a number of 
requests from both other agencies and the public to extend the review 
period due to the complexity of the issues and the length of the Draft 
EIS. After review of the extension requests, and consideration of 
potential impacts to the mining proponent, an additional 45 days is 
reasonable to provide for review of the Draft EIS. The entire comment 
period will total 97-100 days from the release of the Draft.

    Dated: March 13, 1995.
Charles R. Bazan,
Forest Supervisor, Tonto National Forest.
[FR Doc. 95-6891 Filed 3-20-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 60 (Wednesday, March 29, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16160-16161]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7673]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Jimmy Carter National Historic Site Advisory Commission; Meeting

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Advisory Commission Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Commission Act that a meeting of the Jimmy Carter National Historic 
Site Advisory Commission will be held at 8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., at the 
following location and date.

DATES: April 5-6, 1995.

LOCATION: The Carter Center, One Copenhill, Atlanta, Georgia 30307.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Fred Boyles, Superintendent, Jimmy Carter National Historic Site, 
Route 1 Box 800, Andersonville, Georgia 31711, (912) 924-0343.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the Jimmy Carter National 
[[Page 16161]] Historic Site Advisory Commission is to advise the 
Secretary of the Interior or his designee on achieving balanced and 
accurate interpretation of the Jimmy Carter National Historic Site.
    The members of the Advisory Commission are as follows:

Dr. Steven Hochman
Dr. James Sterling Young
Dr. Donald B. Schewe
Dr. Henry King Stanford
Dr. Barbara Fields
Director, National Park Service, Ex-Officio member.

    The matters to be discussed at this meeting include the status of 
park development and planning activities. This meeting will be open to 
the public. However, facilities and space for accommodating members of 
the public are limited. Any member of the public may file with the 
commission a written statement concerning the matters to be discussed. 
Written statements may also be submitted to the Superintendent at the 
address above. Minutes of the meeting will be available at Park 
Headquarters for public inspection approximately 4 weeks after the 
meeting.

    Dated: March 22, 1995.
Frank Catroppa,
Acting Regional Director, Southeast Region.
[FR Doc. 95-7673 Filed 3-28-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2268

ME Global, Inc. d.b.a. ME Elecmetal:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-5718

Radio Systems Corp: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA



### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT

ALAN MICHAEL FELT

,

Appellant

,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee.

No. 2D 2023

- 1003

June 14, 2024

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Lee E. Haworth,

Senior Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, a nd A. Victoria Wiggins

, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee

.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

SLEET, C.J., and VILLANTI and KHOUZAM , JJ., Concur.



### __________________________2



### Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 17, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00456

- CR

Henry T. GARLAND

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2001 CR7086

Honorable Catherine Torres

- Stahl, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Henry T. Garland filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s May 4, 2018 order denying Garland’s request for appointment of counsel pursuant to Chapter 64 of the Texas Code

of Criminal Procedure. The clerk’s reco rd has been filed.

The trial court’s decision to deny a request for appointed counsel to assist in filing a motion for DNA testing under Chapter 64 is not an appealable order. See Whitfield v. State , 430 S.W.3d 405, 408 n. 11 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); Ex parte Gutierrez , 337 S.W.3d 883, 889 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011). We therefore order appellant to show cause by August 1, 2018 why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHER EOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 17th day of July, 2018

.

___________________________________ K eith E. H o ttle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 99.1
                                                                    ------------

                                Certification of
                             Chief Executive Officer
                         of Prime Medical Services, Inc.


This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and accompanies the annual report on Form 10-K (the "Form 10-K") for the
year ended December 31, 2002 of Prime Medical Services, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Issuer").

I, Brad A. Hummel, the Chief Executive Officer, of Issuer certify that to the
best of my knowledge:

         (i)  the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section
              13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
              U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

         (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Issuer.

Dated:  March 7, 2003.



                                  /s/ Brad A. Hummel
                                  ---------------------------------------------
                                  Brad A. Hummel
                                  President and Chief Executive Officer
                                  Prime Medical Services, Inc.
#### Steven R. WOLFE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 48545.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

May 10, 1994.

Patricia A. Richter, Asst. Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Joanne E. Beal, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before SMART, P.J., and KENNEDY and ULRICH, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from the denial of a Rule 24.085 motion for postconviction relief without an evidentiary hearing.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 63 (Monday, April 3, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16882-16883]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8074]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[PRT-800458]


Receipt of Application(s) for Permit

    The following applicant has applied for a permit to conduct certain 
activities with endangered species. This notice is provided pursuant to 
Section 10(c) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 
U.S.C. 1531, et seq.)
    Applicant: Mark D. Hovorka, Department of Biology, York University, 
North York, Ontario, Canada.
    The applicant requests a permit to include take of the lesser long-
nosed bat (Leptonycteris curasoae yerbabuenae) for the purpose of 
scientific research and enhancement of propagation and survival of the 
species as prescribed by Service recovery documents.

ADDRESSES: Written data or comments should be submitted to the 
Assistant Regional Director, Ecological Services, U.S. Fish and 
Wildlife Service, P.O. Box 1306, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87103, and 
must be received by the Assistant Regional Director within 30 days from 
the date of this publication.
    Documents and other information submitted with this application are 
available for review, subject to the requirements of the Privacy Act 
and Freedom of Information Act, by any party who submits a written 
request for a copy of such documents to the above [[Page 16883]] office 
within 30 days of the date of publication of this notice. (See 
ADDRESSES above.)
James A. Young,
Acting Regional Director, Region 2, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
[FR Doc. 95-8074 Filed 3-31-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4843

Arrowhead Electrical Products, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
EXHIBIT 23.1


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We have issued our report  dated  April 2, 2001  accompanying  the  consolidated
financial statements included in the Annual Report of CareCentric,  Inc. on Form
10-K  for  the  year  ended   December  31,  2000.  We  hereby  consent  to  the
incorporation  by reference  of said report in the  Registration  Statements  of
CareCentric,  Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 33-97772, File No. 333-51869,  and File
No. 333-70811).


/s/Grant Thornton, LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
April 16, 2001


1350644
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5076

Enerpac:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 56 (Thursday, March 23, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15298]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7158]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[WY-9020-41-5700; 121982]


Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease

    Pursuant to the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 
3108.2-3(a) and (b)(1), a petition for reinstatement of oil and gas 
lease WYW121982 for lands in Laramie County, Wyoming, was timely filed 
and was accompanied by all the required rentals accruing from the date 
of termination. The lessee has agreed to the amended lease terms for 
rentals and royalties at rates of $10.00 per acre, or fraction thereof, 
per year and 16\2/3\ percent, respectively.
    The lessee has paid the required $500 administrative fee and $125 
to reimburse the Department for the cost of this Federal Register 
notice. The lessee has met all the requirements for reinstatement of 
the lease as set out in Section 31 (d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands 
Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land Management 
is proposing to reinstate lease WYW121982 effective November 1, 1994, 
subject to the original terms and conditions of the lease and the 
increased rental and royalty rates cited above.
Pamela J. Lewis,
Supervisory Land Law Examiner.
[FR Doc. 95-7158 Filed 3-22-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-M
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.1
                                                 Consent of Coopers & Lybrand


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Multimedia Games, Inc., on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-16729; 333-28367; and
333-36319) of our reported dated December 23, 1997, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements of Multimedia Games, Inc. and subsidiaries
as of September 30, 1997 and for each of the two years in the period ended
September 30, 1997, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form
10-KSB.


COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

Tulsa, Oklahoma
December 26, 1997
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Restrepo, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward McLaughlin, J.), rendered on March 1, 1989, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of from five years’ to life imprisonment, unanimously affirmed.

We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly *280harsh or severe. Taking into account, among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction, we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence. *(People v Farrar,*52 NY2d 302, 305.)

Further, defendant was sentenced in accordance with his plea bargain and within statutory guidelines. "Having received the benefit of his bargain, defendant should be bound by its terms.” *(People v Felman,*141 AD2d 889, 890, *Iv denied*72 NY2d 918.) Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Carro, Ellerin and Smith, JJ.