Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 1995 / Notices 16631

1200–1330 Conference Luncheon: Keynote

speech by Major General Stanley Genega,

Director of Civil Works on the History of

Environmental Partnering in the U.S.

Army Corps of Engineers.

1330–1530 Session 2: ‘‘Environmental

Decision-Making in the Corps—

Involvement of Environmental,

Community and Other Public Groups in

Corps Decision-Making’’. A Moderated

Panel Discussion using prepared case

studies examining who participates and

how.

Moderator: Dr. James Regens, EAB ViceChair, Tulane University

Discussants: Dr. Stuart Langton, Challenge

to Leadership, Boston; Mr. James R.

Hanchey, USACE, Lower Mississippi

Valley Division; Colonel Terrance Salt,

South Florida Ecosystem Restoration

Task Force; Mr. Joseph Browder,

Everglades Coalition; Ms. Karen Illardo,

National Audubon Society

1530–1630 Facilitated Group Discussion

in Plenary (Facilitator: L. Aggens)

1630 Adjourn

Wednesday, April 12, 1995

0800–0830 Overview of the day.

0830–1000 Simultaneous Workshops on

specific environmental programs.—

Section 1135 Program

Moderators: Ms. Ellen Cummings,

HQUSACE; Mr. Timothy Searchinger,

Environmental Defense Fund

Moderators: Mr. Michael Davis,

HQUSACE; Mr. Russell Shay, The

Nature Conservancy—Methods to

Integrate Economics and Environment

Moderators: Mr. Ken Orth, USACE Institute

for Water Resources—Environmental

Restoration

Moderators: Mr. Larry Lower, USACE

Baltimore District; Ms. Constance Hunt,

World Wildlife Fund—Flood Plan

Management and Non-Structural

Approaches

Moderators: Mr. Charles Moeslein,

HQUSACE; Mr. Scott Faber, American

Rivers—The Corps Partnership Kit

Moderator: Mr. Richard Sinclair, USACE

Institute for Water Resources

1000–1030 Break

1030–1200 Simultaneous Workshops

Repeated

1200–1330 Lunch

1330–1500 Session 3: A Facilitated

Discussion of Issues, concerns and

recommendations raised in the

simultaneous workshops. (Facilitator: L.

Aggens)

1830–2200 Conference Dinner and Special

Plenary Session—‘‘Twenty Five Years of

the Chief of Engineers Environmental

Advisory Board: Perspectives of the

History-Makers on its Importance and

Influence’’

Moderator: Mr. Jimmy Bates, Deputy

Director of Civil Works

Keynote Speaker: Dr. John Zirschky, Acting

Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil

Works)

Panelists: Lieutenant General Arthur

Williams, Chief of Engineers; Dr. Lettie

Wenner, EAB Chair; Lieutenant General

Frederick Clarke, USA (Ret.); Dr. Lynton

Caldwell, EAB Charter Member;

Lieutenant General E. R. Heilberg, USA

(Ret.); Dr. Warren Viessman, Former EAB

Chair; Dr. Beverly Wright, Incoming EAB

Member

Guests: Lieutenant General John Morris,

USA (Ret.); Lieutenant General Joseph

Bratton, USA (Ret.); Lieutenant General

Henry Hatch, USA (Ret.)

Thursday, April 13, 1995

0800–0900 Report of the EAB to the Chief

0900–0930 Break

0930–1000 Chief’s Response

1000–1100 Public Comments

1100 Adjourn

This meeting is open to the general public

but has limited seating.

Kenneth L. Denton,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 95–7998 Filed 3–30–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710–92–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Energy Information Administration

Agency Information Collection Under

Review by the Office of Management

and Budget

AGENCY: Energy Information

Administration, Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of request submitted for

review by the Office of Management and

Budget.

SUMMARY: The Energy Information

Administration (EIA) has submitted the

energy information collection(s) listed at

the end of this notice to the Office of

Management and Budget (OMB) for

review under provisions of the

Paperwork Reduction Act (Pub. L. No.

96–511, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). This

listing does not include collections of

information contained in new or revised

regulations which are to be submitted

under section 3504(h) of the Paperwork

Reduction Act, nor management and

procurement assistance requirements

collected by the Department assistance

requirements collected by the

Department of Energy (DOE)

Each entry contains the following

information: (1) The sponsor of the

collection (the DOE component or

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

(FERC)); (2) Collection number(s); (3)

Current OMB docket number (if

applicable); (4) Collection title; (5) Type

of request, e.g., new, revision, extension,

or reinstatement; (6) Response

obligation, i.e., mandatory, voluntary, or

required to obtain or retain benefit; (7)

Affected public; (8) An estimate of the

number of respondents per report

period; (9) An estimate of the number of

responses per respondent annually; (10)

An estimate of the average hours per

response; (11) The estimated total

annual respondent burden; and (12) A

brief abstract describing the proposed

collection and the respondents.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or

before May 1, 1995. If you anticipate

that you will be submitting comments

but find it difficult to do so within the

time allowed by this notice, you should

advise the OMB DOE Desk Officer listed

below of your intention to do so as soon

as possible. The Desk Officer may be

telephoned at (202) 395–3084. (Also,

please notify the EIA contact listed

below.)

ADDRESSES: Address comments to the

Department of Energy Desk Officer,

Office of Information and Regulatory

Affairs, Office of Management and

Budget, 726 Jackson Place NW.,

Washington, DC 20503. (Comments

should also be addressed to the Office

of Statistical Standards at the address

below.)

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Requests for additional information or

copies of the forms and instructions

should be directed to Norma White,

Office of Statistical Standards, (EI–73),

Forrestal Building, U.S. Department of

Energy, Washington, DC 20585. Ms.

White may be telephoned at (202) 254–

5327.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

energy information collection submitted

to OMB for review was:

1. Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

2. FERC–555

3. 1902–0098

4. Preservation of Records of Public

Utilities and Licenses, Natural Gas

Companies and Oil Pipeline

Companies

5. Extension

6. Mandatory

7. Business or other for-profit

8. 500 responses

9. 1 response

10. 24,400 hours per response

11. 1,200,000 hours

12. The records retention regulations

establish retention periods and

necessary guidelines and

requirements to sustain retention of

applicable records for the 500

regulated public utilities, natural

gas and oil pipeline companies

subject to the jurisdiction of the

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission.

Statutory Authority: Sec. 2(a) of the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, (Pub. L.

96–511), which amended Chapter 35 of Title

44 United States Code (See 44 U.S.C. 3506(a)

and (c)(1).
16632 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 1995 / Notices

Issued in Washington, D.C., March 25,

1995.

Yvonee M. Bishop,

Director, Office of Statistical Standards,

Energy Information Administration.

[FR Doc. 95–7976 Filed 3–30–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450–01–M

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. CP95–251–000]

Pacific Interstate Transmission

Company; Notice of Application

March 27, 1995.

Take notice that on March 8, 1995,

Pacific Interstate Transmission

Company (PITCO), 633 West Fifth

Street, Suite 5400, Los Angeles,

California, 90071–2071, filed in Docket

No. CP95–251–000, an application

pursuant to Section 7(c) of the Natural

Gas Act for authorization to establish an

additional delivery point at Blanco,

New Mexico for the sale of gas to

PITCO’s sole customer, Southern

California Gas Company (SoCalGas), all

as more fully set forth in the application

which is on file with the Commission

and open for public inspection.

Specifically, PITCO intends to

establish an additional sale and delivery

point at Blanco, New Mexico for the sale

of Canadian gas to SoCalGas. PITCO

states that the additional sale and

delivery point is necessary because of El

Paso Natural Gas Company’s (El Paso)

increasing inability to receive all of

PITCO’s natural gas supplies on a firm

basis at the existing El Paso receipt

point from Northwest Pipeline

Corporation (Northwest) at Ignacio,

Colorado. PITCO says the additional

sale and delivery point will provide

SoCalGas with greater flexibility

concerning its purchases, and will

eliminate unnecessary alternative

transportation costs and construction of

unnecessary pipeline additions.

PITCO states that the addition of new

sale and delivery points is specifically

provided by the General Terms and

Conditions of PITCO’s FERC Gas Tariff.

Any person desiring to be heard or to

make any protest with reference to said

application should on or before April

17, 1995, file with the Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission, Washington,

D.C. 20426, a motion to intervene or a

protest in accordance with the

requirements of the Commission’s Rules

of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR

385.214 or 385.211) and the Regulations

under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR

157.10). All protests filed with the

Commission will be considered by it in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken but will not serve to make the

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

to a proceeding or to participate as a

party in any hearing therein must file a

motion to intervene in accordance with

the Commission’s Rules.

Take further notice that, pursuant to

the authority contained in and subject to

jurisdiction conferred upon the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission by

Sections 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas Act

and the Commission’s Rules of Practice

and Procedure, a hearing will be held

without further notice before the

Commission or its designee on this

application if no motion to intervene is

filed within the time required herein, if

the Commission on its own review of

the matter finds that a grant of the

certificate is required by the public

convenience and necessity. If a motion

for leave to intervene is timely filed, or

if the Commission on its own motion

believes that a formal hearing is

required, further notice of such hearing

will be duly given.

Under the procedure herein provided

for, unless otherwise advised, it will be

unnecessary for PITCO to appear or be

represented at the hearing.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–7901 Filed 3–30–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. RP91–203–000, et al.]

Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company,

Notice of Informal Settlement

Conference

March 27, 1995.

Take notice that an informal

settlement conference will be convened

in this proceeding on Wednesday, April

5, 1995, at 10:00 a.m., at the offices of

the Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission, 810 First Street, N.E.,

Washington, D.C. for the purpose of

exploring the possible settlement of the

above-referenced docket.

Any party, as defined by 18 CFR

385.102(c), or any participant, as

defined by 18 CFR 385.102(b), is invited

to attend. Persons wishing to become a

party must move to intervene and

receive intervenor status pursuant to the

Commission’s regulations (18 CFR

385.214).

For additional information, please

contact Dennis H. Melvin at (202) 208–

0042 or Donald Williams at (202) 208–

0743.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–7900 Filed 3–30–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. ER94–1545–000]

Calpine Power Marketing, Inc.; Notice

of Issuance of Order

March 28, 1995.

On August 9, 1994 and February 8,

1995, Calpine Power Marketing, Inc.

(CPMI) submitted for filing a rate

schedule under which CPMI will engage

in wholesale electric power and energy

transactions as a marketer. CPMI also

requested waiver of various Commission

regulations. In particular, CPMI

requested that the Commission grant

blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 34

of all future issuances of securities and

assumptions of liability by CPMI.

On March 9, 1995, pursuant to

delegated authority, the Director,

Division of Applications, Office of

Electric Power Regulation, granted

requests for blanket approval under Part

34, subject to the following:

Within thirty days of the date of the

order, any person desiring to be heard

or to protest the blanket approval of

issuances of securities or assumptions of

liability by CPMI should file a motion

to intervene or protest with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission, 825

North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington,

D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules

211 and 214 of the Commission’s Rules

of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR

385.211 and 385.214).

Absent a request for hearing within

this period, CPMI is authorized to issue

securities and assume obligations or

liabilities as a guarantor, indorser,

surety, or otherwise in respect of any

security of another person; provided

that such issuance or assumption is for

some lawful object within the corporate

purposes of the applicant, and

compatible with the public interest, and

is reasonably necessary or appropriate

for such purposes.

The Commission reserves the right to

require a further showing that neither

public nor private interests will be

adversely affected by continued

approval of CPMI’s issuances of

securities or assumptions of liability.

Notice is hereby given that the

deadline for filing motions to intervene

or protests, as set forth above, is April

10, 1995.

Copies of the full text of the order are

available from the Commission’s Public

Reference Branch, Room 3308, 941

North Capitol Street, N.E. Washington,

D.C. 20426.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–7951 Filed 3–30–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M