Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 65 / Wednesday, April 5, 1995 / Rules and Regulations 17193

previous 12-month period ending with

the current month.

The suspension of this shipping

requirement was requested by United

Dairymen of Arizona (UDA), a

cooperative association that represents

nearly all of the dairy farmers who

supply the Central Arizona market.

UDA contends that the continued pool

status of their manufacturing plant is

threatened by an increase in milk

production combined with a drop in

Class I sales. UDA states that in 1994 its

member production increased 17

percent over the previous year. In 1994,

monthly deliveries to distributing plants

also increased sufficiently to ensure

UDA a safe margin over the minimum

50 percent shipping requirement to

maintain pool status of its

manufacturing plant.

One dairy farmer filed a comment

opposing the suspension action. The

dairy farmer opposed the action because

it would allow for more milk to

continue to be regulated under the order

than would otherwise be the case. As a

result, the dairy farmer asserted that he

would receive a lower blend price than

if the action were not taken because

some milk would not qualify for

regulation under the order.

During the past year, there has been

an increase in the production of milk

and an increase in distributing plant

demand. Primarily, the increased

demand is a result of a significant

increase in Class I sales in Mexico by

Central Arizona handlers. The recent

collapse in value of the Mexican peso

has curtailed these sales and thus

reduced handler requirements for bulk

milk deliveries; however, production

has not declined. This general increase

in production and decline in sales

affects all producers in the market

equally. If the action were not taken,

some milk would not receive the

benefits of the blend price resulting

from regulation under the order. By

taking this action, all producers who

have historically supplied the market

would continue to share equally in the

benefits of regulation without costly and

inefficient movements of milk simply to

maintain their pool status.

The comment submitted by UDA in

support of the proposed suspension

clarified the specific order language that

UDA requested be suspended. UDA did

not intend for the words ‘‘its member

producer milk’’ and ‘‘received at the

pool plants of other handlers during the

current month’’ to be included in the

proposed suspension. Upon review of

UDA’s request and supporting

comment, the order language in

§ 1131.7(c) to be suspended has been

modified to exclude these specific

words.

UDA also requested that the

suspension be granted for an indefinite

period beginning in March 1995. After

reviewing the marketing conditions of

the Central Arizona marketing area and

their relationship with the uncertain

value of the Mexican peso, this

suspension will be for a one-year

period. The marketing conditions

indicate that the suspension should not

begin until April 1995.

Accordingly, it is appropriate to

suspend the aforesaid provisions

beginning April 1, 1995, through March

31, 1996.

It is hereby found and determined

that thirty days’ notice of the effective

date hereof is impractical, unnecessary

and contrary to the public interest in

that:

(a) The suspension is necessary to

reflect current marketing conditions and

to assure orderly marketing conditions

in the marketing area, in that such rule

is necessary to permit the continued

pooling of the milk of dairy farmers who

have historically supplied the market

without the need for making costly and

inefficient movements of milk;

(b) This suspension does not require

of persons affected substantial or

extensive preparation prior to the

effective date; and

(c) Notice of proposed rulemaking

was given interested parties and they

were afforded opportunity to file written

data, views or arguments concerning

this suspension. Two comments were

received.

Therefore, good cause exists for

making this order effective less than 30

days from the date of publication in the

Federal Register.

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1131

Milk marketing orders.

For the reasons set forth in the

preamble, the following provisions in

Title 7, Part 1131, are amended as

follows:

PART 1131—MILK IN THE CENTRAL

ARIZONA MARKETING AREA

1. The authority citation for 7 CFR

Part 1131 continues to read as follows:

Authority: Secs. 1–19, 48 Stat 31, as

amended; 7 U.S.C. 601–674.

§ 1131.7 [Suspended in part]

2. In § 1131.7(c), the words ‘‘50

percent or more of’’, ‘‘(including the

skim milk and butterfat in fluid milk

products transferred from its own plant

pursuant to this paragraph that is not in

excess of the skim milk and butterfat

contained in member producer milk

actually received at such plant)’’ and

‘‘or the previous 12-month period

ending with the current month.’’ are

suspended for the months of April 1,

1995, through March 31, 1996.

Dated: March 27, 1995.

Patricia Jensen,

Acting Assistant Secretary. Marketing and

Regulatory Programs.

[FR Doc. 95–8353 Filed 4–4–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410–02–P

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

[Notice 1995–6]

11 CFR Parts 100, 104 and 113

Expenditures; Reports by Political

Committees; Personal Use of

Campaign Funds

AGENCY: Federal Election Commission.

ACTION: Final rules; announcement of

effective date.

SUMMARY: On February 9, 1995, the

Commission published the text of

revised regulations governing the

personal use of campaign funds. 60 FR

7862. These regulations implement

portions of the Federal Election

Campaign Act of 1971, as amended. The

Commission announces that the rules

are effective as of April 5, 1995.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 5, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Susan E. Propper, Assistant General

Counsel, 999 E Street NW., Washington,

D.C. 20463, (202) 219–3690 or (800)

424–9530.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Today, the

Commission is announcing the effective

date of its new regulations governing the

personal use of campaign funds. The

new rules insert a definition of personal

use into the Commission’s regulations.

The rules also amend the definition of

expenditure and the reporting

requirements for authorized committees

in the current regulations.

Section 438(d) of Title 2, United

States Code requires that any rules or

regulations prescribed by the

Commission to carry out the provisions

of Title 2 of the United States Code be

transmitted to the Speaker of the House

of Representatives and the President of

the Senate 30 legislative days before

they are finally promulgated. These

regulations were transmitted to

Congress on February 3, 1995. Thirty

legislative days expired in the House of

Representatives on March 23, 1995.

Thirty legislative days expired in the

Senate on March 22, 1995.

Announcement of Effective Date: 11

CFR 100.8(b)(22), 104.3(b)(4)(i)(B),
17194 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 65 / Wednesday, April 5, 1995 / Rules and Regulations

113.1(g) and 113.2(a), as published at 60

FR 7862 (February 9, 1995), are effective

as of April 5, 1995.

Dated: March 31, 1995.

Danny L. McDonald,

Chairman, Federal Election Commission.

[FR Doc. 95–8310 Filed 4–4–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6715–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 25

[Docket No. NM–105, Special Conditions

No. 25–ANM–97]

Special Conditions: Saab Aircraft AB

Model Saab 2000 Series Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Final special conditions.

SUMMARY: These special conditions are

for the Saab Aircraft AB Model Saab

2000 airplane. This airplane will have

novel and unusual design features,

relating to its electronic flight control

system, when compared to the state of

technology envisioned in the

airworthiness standards of part 25 of the

Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR).

These special conditions contain the

additional safety standards which the

Administrator considers necessary to

establish a level of safety equivalent to

that provided by the airworthiness

standards of part 25.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 29, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mark I. Quam, FAA, Standardization

Branch, ANM–113, Transport Standards

Staff, Transport Airplane Directorate,

Aircraft Certification Service, 1601 Line

Avenue SW, Renton, Washington

98055–4056; telephone (206) 227–2145,

facsimile (206) 277–1320.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Background

Special conditions are prescribed

under the provisions of § 21.16 of the

FAR when the applicable regulations for

type certification do not contain

adequate or appropriate standards

because of novel or unusual design

features. The new Saab 2000

incorporates a number of such design

features.

The Saab 2000, certificated on April

29, 1994, is a twin-engined, low-wing,

pressurized turboprop aircraft that is

configured for approximately 50

passengers. The airplane has two

Allison Engine Company AE 2100A

engines rated at 3650 shp. The propeller

is a 6 bladed Dowty Rotol swept shaped

propeller. A single lever controls each

prop/engine combination. An Auxiliary

Power Unit (APU) will be installed in

the tail. The airplane has provisions for

two pilots, an observer, two flight

attendants, overhead bins, a toilet, and

provisions for the installation of a

galley. There is a forward and aft

stowage compartment and an aft cargo

compartment. The airplane has a

maximum operating altitude of 31,000

feet.

The Saab 2000 has a fully

hydraulically powered electronically

controlled rudder and will have fully

hydraulically powered electronically

controlled elevators as a follow-on

design modification. The Powered

Elevator Control System (PECS)

provides control and power actuation of

the left and right elevator surfaces. The

PECS also provides aircraft stability

augmentation and trim functions.

The proposed elevator system is in

many respects similar to the rudder

design and is comprised of a mix of

analog and digital circuitry and has no

mechanical backup. Control columns

are connected to Linear Variable

Differential Transducers (LVDT), stick

damper(s), auto pilot servo, linear

springs with break-outs and are

interconnected with an electronic

disconnect unit.

The position transducers (LVDT),

connected to the control columns,

provide signals to two Powered Elevator

Control Units (PECU). Each PECU

controls two Elevator Servo Actuators

(ESA) through two separate Servo

Actuator Channels (SAC). Each SAC is

subdivided into a primary control lane

and a monitor lane. Two of the four

ESAs, controlled by one PECU,

positions one elevator side.

The ESAs have two modes of

operation, active and damped. The

active mode will result when mode

control current from the PECU and

hydraulic pressure are available. One

active servo actuator is sufficient to

operate the elevator surface.

Elevator Servo Actuators valve and

actuator ram position feedback are

provided by position transducers

(LVDT). The PECUs are connected to

one Flight Control Computer via the

trim relay and two Digital Air Data

Computers. The flight control computer

also provides a signal to the auto pilot

servo.

Stick to elevator gearing is a function

of Indicated Airspeed (IAS). Trim and

stability augmentation are based on IAS,

vertical acceleration and flap position.

Stick, trim and elevator position and

status information are fed to the Engine

Indicating and Crew Alerting System

(EICAS).

Each PECU has built in Automatic

Preflight Built in test (PBIT) and

Continuous Built In Test (CBIT)

circuitry and utilizing cross channel

nomitoring.

The elevator’s actuators are supplied

by three hydraulic circuits that are

physically separated, isolated, fused and

located to minimize common cause

failures. The Number 1 hydraulic circuit

is powered by the left engine and a

backup DC pump and accumulators.

The Number 2 hydraulic circuit is

powered by the right engine and a

backup AC pump and accumulators.

THe Number 3 hydraulic circuit is

powered by an AC drive pump.

The Number 1 hydraulic circuit

powers the left hand (LH) and right

hand (RH) outboard servo actuators. The

Number 2 hydraulic circuit powers the

RH inboard servo actuator. the Number

3 hydraulic circuit powers the LH

inboard servo actuator.

Hydraulic warnings and cautions in

the event of hydraulic supply failure are

provided by the EICAS.

The elevator system is electrically

supported by two system sides, a LH

and a RH side. The electrical system is

normally powered by two AC

generators, each driven by a propeller

gear box. An APU equipped with a

standby generator is installed. When

only one of the three generators is

working, it supplies power to both LH

and RH sides.

Each LH and RH AC system side is

connected via a Transformer Rectifier

Unit (TRU) to a LH and RH DC system

made up of a network of DC buses. A

third center TRU is connected to a

center circuit. The LH, RH and center

buses can be supplied from batteries or

from the TRUs. The center TRU will

replace a failed RH or LH TRU. When

only one TRU unit is working, the LH

and RH buses are tied together with

power being received from the

remaining TRU.

Two DC feeders in addition to two AC

feeders provide power aft of the debris

zone. The LH side is routed through the

ceiling and the RH side is routed

through the floor.

Type Certification Basis

The applicable requirements for U.S.

type certification must be established in

accordance with §§ 21.16, 21.17, 21.19,

21.29, and 21.101 of the FAR.

Accordingly, based on the application

date of June 9, 1989, and Saab Aircraft

AB volunteering for certain later

regulations, the TC basis for the Saab

2000 airplane is as follows: