alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 15.1

                  SCHEDULE OF VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
                           (U.S. DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

                                      Balance at   Provision for   Write-offs of
                                      beginning       doubtful      previously      Translation       Balance at
                                      of period       accounts   provided accounts  adjustments     end of Period
                                      ---------       --------   -----------------  -----------     -------------
Year ended December 31, 2005:
Allowance for doubtful debts            $ 320          $ (13)           $ -            $ (1)             $ 306

Year ended December 31, 2004:
Allowance for doubtful debts            $ 187          $ 131            $ -            $  2              $ 320

Year ended December 31, 2003:
Allowance for doubtful debts            $ 150          $  32            $ -            $  5              $ 187
```
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6132

SGRE, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 11, 1995 / Presidential Documents 2673

Presidential Determination No. 95–12 of December 31, 1994

Suspending Restrictions on U.S. Relations With the Palestine

Liberation Organization

Memorandum for the Secretary of State

Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Middle East Peace Facilitation

Act of 1994, part E of title V, Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal

Years 1994 and 1995, Public Law 103–236, (‘‘the Act’’), I hereby:

(1) certify that it is in the national interest to suspend the application

of the following provisions of law until July 1, 1995:

(A) Section 307 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as amended (22

U.S.C. 2227), as it applies with respect to the Palestine Liberation Organization or entities associated with it;

(B) Section 114 of the Department of State Authorization Act, Fiscal Years

1984 and 1985 (22 U.S.C. 287e note), as it applies with respect to the

Palestine Liberation Organization or entities associated with it;

(C) Section 1003 of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years

1988 and 1989 (22 U.S.C. 2502); and

(D) Section 37, Bretton Woods Agreement Act (22 U.S.C. 286w), as it

applies to the granting to the Palestine Liberation Organization of observer

status or other official status at any meeting sponsored by or associated

with the International Monetary Fund.

(2) certify that the Palestine Liberation Organization continues to abide

by the commitments described in section 583(b)(4) of the Act.

You are authorized and directed to transmit this determination to the Congress and to publish it in the 

œ–

Federal Register.

THE WHITE HOUSE,

Washington, December 31, 1994. [FR Doc. 95–845

Filed 1–9–95; 3:01 pm]

Billing code 4710–10–M
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C 1350)
    Cole Credit Property Trust II, Inc.By:
    /s/ Christopher H. ColeName:
    Christopher H. ColeTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer
and President 
(Principal
Executive Officer)By:
    /s/ D. Kirk McAllaster, Jr.Name:
    D. Kirk McAllaster, Jr.Date: November 12, 2010
    
    Title:
    Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial
Officer 
(Principal
Financial Officer)
#### STATE of Texas and City of Austin, Petitioners, v. Donnie Ruth Moore EDWARDS et al., Respondents.

No. D-3627.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Nov. 24, 1993.

Rehearing Overruled Feb. 2, 1994.

Diana L. Granger, Dan Morales, and John J. Greene, Austin, for petitioners.

Kent A. Sick, Austin and Harold 0. Atkinson, San Antonio, for respondents.

On APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF ERROR TO the Court of Appeals for the Third District of Texas

PER CURIAM.

This case involves the condemnation of a strip of land in connection with the modifications to U.S. Highway 183 in Austin. We described those modifications in some detail in *State v. Schmidt,*867 S.W.2d 769 (Tex.1993). In this case the State of Texas and the City of Austin condemned a 1,096-square-foot strip along the highway. The strip is part of a 21,750-square-foot tract of commercial property located a block away from the properties involved in *Schmidt.*The issue here, as it was in *Schmidt,*is whether landowners who have part of their property taken by power of eminent domain to. convert a highway into a controlled-access freeway must also be compensated for a decrease in value of the remainder caused by diversion of traffic, increased circuity of travel, lessened visibility, and interim construction inconvenience. 867 S.W.2d 769 (Tex.1993). There is no dispute over the value of the strip of land actually taken; the challenge concerns only the jury’s award of $103,270 as damages to the remainder.

Landowners introduced evidence on the nature and duration of construction activities *322and the decrease in market value of the remainder due to the highway modifications, loss of visibility, loss in traffic flow on the frontage roads, and the effects of construction activity. The State and City objected to the admission of evidence of noneompensable “community” damages and requested that the jury be instructed not to consider circuity of travel, diversion of traffic, construction inconvenience, and loss of visibility in assessing damages. The trial court overruled these objections and rendered judgment on the verdict. The court of appeals affirmed. 867 S.W.2d ,769.

It appears that the only claims of damage to the remainder are for injuries *Schmidt*holds are noneompensable. For the reasons explained in *Schmidt,*a majority of the Court, without hearing oral argument, grants the application for writ of error, reverses the judgment of the court of appeals, modifies the judgment of the trial court to delete the award of $103,270, and affirms that judgment as modified.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5691

Fluor Enterprises, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Universal Capital Management, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ending October 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael D. Queen, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Michael D. Queen

Michael D. Queen,

Principal Financial Officer

December 20, 2011
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-3968

Alo Tennessee Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Edward O. NEWLAND, Appellant.

No. WD 41104.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

June 20, 1989.

Grant W. Smith, Cyril M. Hendricks, Jefferson City, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before KENNEDY, C.J., and TURNAGE and GAITAN, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from a conviction for sale of a controlled substance in violation of Section 195.020.1, RSMo 1986.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C 1350)

 

Each of the undersigned officers of Cole Credit Property Trust II, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, for purposes of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:

 

(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; as amended, and

 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

|   |   |         | **Cole Credit Property Trust II, Inc.**

  |
|--------|--------|--------------|-------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |         |                                            | By:  | /s/ Christopher H. Cole |
|   |   |         |                                            | Name:  | Christopher H. Cole |
|   |   |         |                                            | Title:  | Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer) |
|   |   |         |                                            |   |   |
|   |   |         |                                            | By:  | /s/ D. Kirk McAllaster, Jr. |
|   |   |         |                                            | Name:  | D. Kirk McAllaster, Jr. |
|   | Date:  | May 15, 2009 |                                            | Title:  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Accounting Officer) |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished with the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general information language in such filing, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates by reference. 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Jacob Even-Ezra:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F/A of Magal Security Systems
Ltd.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13(a)-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
Subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date:  March 25, 2004

/s/Jacob Even-Ezra *
--------------------
Jacob Even-Ezra

Chief Executive Officer

* The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the
Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6000

ERON JOHNSON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

JON P. GALLEY; JOHN JOSEPH CURRAN, JR.,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-04-

3152-AMD)

Submitted: April 28, 2005 Decided: May 5, 2005

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eron Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Eron Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying as untimely his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254

(2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. §2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his

constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Johnson has not made the requisite

showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-11645

United Scope LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_05.09.19.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel