alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 62 (Friday, March 31, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 16764]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7939]




[[Page 16763]]

_______________________________________________________________________

Part VII





Department of the Interior





_______________________________________________________________________



Bureau of Indian Affairs



_______________________________________________________________________



Indian Gaming; Notices

Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 1995 / Notices 
 
[[Page 16764]] 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs


Indian Gaming

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Approved First Amendment to Tribal/State Compact.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 2710, of the Indian Gaming Regulatory 
Act of 1988 (Pub. L. 100-497), the Secretary of the Interior shall 
publish, in the Federal Register, notice of approved Tribal/State 
Compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III (casino) gaming on 
Indian reservations. The Assistant Secretary-Indian Affairs, Department 
of the Interior, through her delegated authority, has approved the 
First Amendment to the Tribal/State Gaming Compact Between the 
Swinomish Indian Tribal Community and the State of Washington executed 
on January 26, 1995.

DATES: This action is effective March 31, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George T. Skibine, Director, Indian 
Gaming Management Staff, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Washington, D.C. 
20240, (202) 219-4068.

    Dated: March 17, 1995.
Ada E. Deer,
Assistant Secretary - Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 95-7939 Filed 3-30-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-02-P
Form of Amd 1 to the Aleris Corp 2010 Equity Incentive Plan RSU Agreement



 Exhibit 10.15.1 

ALERIS CORPORATION 
 2010 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN 
 Form of 

AMENDMENT 1 TO 
 RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AGREEMENT 
 On June 11, 2011 you were granted restricted stock
units of Aleris Corporation (the “Company”) pursuant to an Award Agreement issued under the Company’s 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). 
 In light of the Company becoming a public company, we have amended, restated and renamed the Plan as the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan and we have mutually agreed to amend the terms of your Award Agreement,
effective immediately prior to the effectiveness of a 2011 initial public offering of the Company (the “IPO”), as follows: 
  

	1.	Section 1. Grant of Restricted Stock Units. The last two sentences of Section 1 are deleted. 


 

	2.	Section 9(b). Governmental Regulations and Stop-Transfer Orders. Section 9(b) is amended to delete subsections 9(b)(v), 9(c) and 9(d).


  

	3.	Section 10(b). Tax Reporting. Section 10(b) is amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows: 


(b) For purposes of this Agreement, “Fair Market Value” is defined in the Plan. 

 

	4.	Section 13. Stockholders Agreement. Section 13 is deleted. 


 

	5.	Section 15. Restricted Stock Units Subject to the Plan. Section 15 is amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows:


 Restricted Stock Units Subject to the Plan. By entering into this Agreement, the Participant agrees and
acknowledges that (i) the Participant has received and read a copy of the Plan as in effect on the date hereof, and (ii) the Restricted Stock Units are subject to the Plan. In the event of a conflict between any term or provision contained
in this Agreement and any term or provision of the Plan, the terms and provisions of this Agreement shall prevail. No amendment to the Plan or this Agreement that is inconsistent with the express terms of this Agreement and that adversely affects
any of the Participant’s rights under this Agreement shall be effective as to this Agreement without the Participant’s prior written consent; provided, however, the Committee may amend the Plan and this Agreement to the extent necessary to
comply with the applicable law. 
  

	6.	Effective date of this Amendment. This Amendment is effective immediately prior to the effectiveness of the IPO. 


 

	7.	Continued Terms of Restricted Stock Units. Except as otherwise amended in this Agreement, your restricted stock units remain subject in all respects to the terms
and conditions of the Award Agreement and the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan and you acknowledge that a copy of the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan has been provided to you. 


 
 8146573.3 







 Please indicate your acceptance of this Amendment to the Award Agreement with respect to your restricted
stock units by signing and returning a copy of this Amendment to the address set forth below as soon as practicable. 
  

	
	ALERIS CORPORATION
	
	  
	Christopher R. Clegg
	 Executive Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary

	     

	
	 
	Participant:
	Date:



  
 2 


 8146573.3
clavis_s1a-ex1011.htm








Exhibit 10.11


 


 


The contract for developing the 2nd phase of RFID-based intelligent collaborative logistics & distributions’ information system








	
Parties of the contracts

	
Korea Pallet Pool (LogisAll), Clavis Technologies


	
The contract period

	
2008.12.31~2009.07.31


	
The contract amount

	
\ 250,000,000 (separate VAT, Value-Added Tax)


	
The payment condition

	
Prepayment : 50% of contract amount (\ 125,000,000)


The part payment : 30% of contract amount (\ 75,000,000)


The rest: 20% of contract amount (\ 50,000,000)


	
The warranty period

	
~2010.07.31


	
Contents of the contract

	
Developing the 2nd phase of RFID-based intelligent collaborative logistics & distributions’ information system


	
Attached papers

	
Appendix 1. Statement for what will be provided
TERRANCE GAY

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 2750

___________ __________________/

Opinion filed November 5, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Bay County

. James B. Fensom , Judge

.

Terrance Gay, pro se , Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Kristen Bonjour, Assistant Attorney

General

, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

SWANSON, MAKAR, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Universal Capital Management, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending January 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael D. Queen, Chief Executive Officer of our Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of our Company.



|                    |                               | 
|------------------- | ----------------------------- | 
|Date:  June 7, 2013 | /s/ Michael D. Queen          | 
|                    | Michael D. Queen,             | 
|                    | Chief Executive Officer       | 
|                    | (Principal Executive Officer) | 
|                    |                               |
<PAGE>

                                                               EXHIBIT NO. 10.1

The CIT Group/ 
Business Credit 
1211 Avenue of the Americas 
New York, NY 10036 

212-536-1200
THE
CIT
GROUP

                                 March 29, 1999

UNITED RETAIL GROUP, INC.
UNITED RETAIL INCORPORATED
365 West Passaic Street
Rochelle Park, NJ 07662

Gentlemen:

We refer to the Financing Agreement by and among United Retail Group, Inc.
("URGI") United Retail Incorporated ("URI" and together with URGI the
"Companies"), The CIT Group/Business Credit, Inc., as Agent and Lender,
FirsTrust Bank, as Lender and other parties hereafter becoming the Lenders
thereunder, dated August 15, 1997, as amended (herein the "Agreement").
Capitalized terms used herein and defined in the Agreement shall have the
meanings specified therein unless otherwise specifically defined herein.

Effective immediately pursuant to mutual understanding, Section 1 of the
Agreement shall be and hereby is, amended by amending the definition of
"Anniversary Date" as set forth therein in its entirety to read as follows:

   "Anniversary Date" shall mean August 15, 2001 and the same date in each year
   thereafter." 


<PAGE>

Except as hereinabove specifically provided no other change in or
waiver of the terms, provisions or conditions of the Agreement is intended or
implied. If the foregoing is in accordance with your understanding of our
agreement kindly so indicate by signing and returning the enclosed copy of this
letter. 

                                        Very truly yours,                 
                                                                          
                                        THE CIT GROUP/BUSINESS            
                                        CREDIT, INC., as Agent and Lender 
                                                                          
                                                                          
                                        By: /s/ Karen Hoffman               
                                           ------------------------------ 
                                        Title: Assistant Vice President   
                                                                          
                                                                          
                                        FIRSTRUST BANK, as Lender         
                                                                          
                                                                          
                                        By: /s/ Edward D'Ancona             
                                           ------------------------------ 
                                        Title: Executive Vice President  
 
                                        
Read and Agreed to:


UNITED RETAIL GROUP, INC.

By: /s/ Jon Grossman
   ------------------------
Title: Vice President


UNITED RETAIL INCORPORATED

By: /s/ Kenneth P. Carroll
   ------------------------
Title: President
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4553

Swagelok Company:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    Exhibit 23



                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
General Growth Properties, Inc. on Forms S-3 (File Nos. 333-11067, 333-15907,
333-17021, 333-23035, 333-37247, 333-37383 and 333-41603) and the Registration
Statement on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 33-79372, 333-07241, 333-11237 and 333-28449)
of our reports dated February 9, 1998, on our audits of the consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedule of General Growth
Properties, Inc. as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and for the three years in
the period ended December 31, 1997, which reports are included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.



                                               Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.


Chicago, Illinois
March 25, 1998
EXHIBIT 99.4

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

We hereby consent to the inclusion in this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 40-F (“Form  40-F/A”) of Enbridge Inc. (the “Corporation”) for the year ended December 31, 2013 and to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-145236, 333-127265, 333-13456, 333-97305 and 333-6436), Form F-3 (File Nos. 333-185591 and 33-77022) and Form F-10 (File No. 333-189157) of the Corporation and the registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-184298) of Enbridge Energy Management, L.L.C. of our report dated February 14, 2014 relating to the consolidated financial statements of the Corporation as at December 31, 2013 and 2012 and for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2013 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as at December 31, 2013.

 

/s/ “PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP”

 

Chartered Accountants

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

May 6, 2014

 

----
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5073

Radio Systems Corp:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_5-30-2019.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4609

OMRON Management Center of America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5861

Scosche Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-2000             NOV-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1999             DEC-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-2000             NOV-30-1999
<CASH>                                           9,611                   4,783
<SECURITIES>                                     4,628                   7,647
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,562                  12,824
<ALLOWANCES>                                       705                     294
<INVENTORY>                                      6,022                   5,082
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,048                  31,342
<PP&E>                                           9,307                   8,536
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,416                   6,673
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  43,646                  37,058
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,838                   6,331
<BONDS>                                            288                     331
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           109                     107
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,810                  29,688
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    43,646                  37,058
<SALES>                                         39,561                  58,559
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,561                  58,559
<CGS>                                           22,410                  36,028
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,410                  36,028
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   504                     275
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  13                     234
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,320                   9,042
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,269                   3,215
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,051                   5,827
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,051                   5,827
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.19                    0.67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.18                    0.64


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Lance T. Alexander, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Counsel’s application to withdraw granted *(see, People v Crawford,*71 AD2d 38). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Mark, J.—attempted criminal possession of a weapon, third degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr, Pine and Lawton, JJ.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5135

Enerpac:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel