16480 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 61 / Thursday, March 30, 1995 / Notices

ESTIMATED STATE MEDIAN INCOME FOR 4-PERSON FAMILIES, BY STATE, FISCAL YEAR 19961—Continued

States

Estimated

State median income

4-person

families 2

60 percent

of estimated

State median income

4-person

families

Georgia ............................................................................................................................................................................ 44,120 26,472

Hawaii .............................................................................................................................................................................. 54,856 32,914

Idaho ................................................................................................................................................................................ 39,851 23,911

Illinois ............................................................................................................................................................................... 47,975 28,785

Indiana ............................................................................................................................................................................. 44,274 26,564

Iowa .................................................................................................................................................................................. 42,772 25,663

Kansas ............................................................................................................................................................................. 43,155 25,893

Kentucky .......................................................................................................................................................................... 36,291 21,775

Louisiana .......................................................................................................................................................................... 35,177 21,106

Maine ............................................................................................................................................................................... 41,513 24,908

Maryland .......................................................................................................................................................................... 53,717 32,230

Massachusetts ................................................................................................................................................................. 55,120 33,072

Michigan ........................................................................................................................................................................... 46,633 27,980

Minnesota ......................................................................................................................................................................... 48,817 29,290

Mississippi ........................................................................................................................................................................ 34,001 20,401

Missouri ............................................................................................................................................................................ 42,162 25,297

Montana ........................................................................................................................................................................... 38,157 22,894

Nebraska .......................................................................................................................................................................... 42,262 25,357

Nevada ............................................................................................................................................................................. 46,137 27,682

New Hampshire ............................................................................................................................................................... 49,452 29,671

New Jersey ...................................................................................................................................................................... 57,916 34,750

New Mexico ..................................................................................................................................................................... 35,560 21,336

New York ......................................................................................................................................................................... 47,570 28,542

North Carolina .................................................................................................................................................................. 42,691 25,615

North Dakota .................................................................................................................................................................... 41,084 24,650

Ohio .................................................................................................................................................................................. 46,116 27,670

Oklahoma ......................................................................................................................................................................... 35,133 21,080

Oregon ............................................................................................................................................................................. 42,745 25,647

Pennsylvania .................................................................................................................................................................... 47,109 28,265

Rhode Island .................................................................................................................................................................... 47,908 28,745

South Carolina ................................................................................................................................................................. 40,163 24,098

South Dakota ................................................................................................................................................................... 38,067 22,840

Tennessee ....................................................................................................................................................................... 38,341 23,005

Texas ............................................................................................................................................................................... 40,688 24,413

Utah .................................................................................................................................................................................. 42,630 25,578

Vermont ............................................................................................................................................................................ 44,184 26,510

Virginia ............................................................................................................................................................................. 47,732 28,639

Washington ...................................................................................................................................................................... 50,557 30,334

West Virginia .................................................................................................................................................................... 34,189 20,513

Wisconsin ......................................................................................................................................................................... 46,363 27,818

Wyoming .......................................................................................................................................................................... 45,414 27,248

Note—FY 1996 covers the period of October 1, 1995 through September 30, 1996. The estimated median income for 4-person families living

in the United States is $45,161 for FY 1996. The estimates are effective for the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) at any

time between the date of this publication and October 1, 1995, or by the beginning of a LIHEAP grantee’s fiscal year, whichever is later. 1 In accordance with 45 CFR 96.85, each state’s estimated median income for a 4-person family is multiplied by the following percentages to

adjust for family size: 52% for one person, 68% for two persons, 84% for three persons, 100% for four persons, 116% for five persons, and

132% for six persons. For family sizes greater than six persons, add 3% to 132% for each additional family member and multiply the new percentage by the state’s estimated median income for a 4-person family. 2Prepared by the Bureau of the Census from the March 1994 Current Population Survey, 1990 Decennial Census of Population and Housing,

and 1993 per capita personal income estimates, by state, from the Bureau of Economic Analysis.

[FR Doc. 95–7741 Filed 3–29–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4184–01–P

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. 94M–0363]

ExogenTM, Inc.; Premarket Approval of

Sonic Accelerated Fracture Healing

System (SAFHS); Correction

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration,

HHS.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug

Administration (FDA) is correcting a

notice that appeared in the Federal

Register of November 9, 1994 (59 FR

55847). The document announced the

approval of the ExogenTM, Inc., Sonic

Accelerated Fracture Healing System

(SAFHS). Some information was

inadvertently omitted and incorrect

approval dates were used. This

document corrects those errors.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

LaJuana D. Caldwell, Office of Policy

(HF–27), Food and Drug

Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,

Rockville, MD 20857, 301–443–2994.

In FR Doc. 94–27222, appearing on

page 55847, in the Federal Register of

November 9, 1994, the following

corrections are made:

1. On page 55847, in the third

column, the ‘‘SUMMARY’’ section,

beginning in the 5th line, ‘‘September

13, 1994’’ should read ‘‘October 5,

1994’’; and in the ‘‘SUPPLEMENTARY
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 61 / Thursday, March 30, 1995 / Notices 16481

INFORMATION’’ section in, beginning

in the 10th line, the words ‘‘acceleration

of the time to a healed fracture for fresh,

closed, distal’’ should read ‘‘the

treatment of fresh, closed, posteriorly

displaced distal.’’

2. On page 55848, in the first column,

in the first paragraph, in the 31st line,

after the word ‘‘indication’’, the

following paragraph is added:

All other indications for the device will

require additional data, and PMA

supplements must be submitted for new

indications. Furthermore, the applicant must

conduct a study to gather additional

information to validate some of the

conclusions that were drawn from the PMA

studies, based on a larger size.

3. On the same page, in the first

column, in the 38th line, after the word

‘‘review’’, the following paragraph is

added:

In accordance with the Panel’s observation

that differences exist in the rate of healing in

different age groups, CDRH also directed the

applicant to include a warning statement

regarding the specific age range of the

patients to be treated. CDRH concluded that

based on the study’s success criteria (e.g.,

both radiographically and clinically healed),

the results of study did show a statistically

significant difference in the time to a healed

fracture in favor of the active device.

4. On the same page, in the first

column, in the 43d line, after the word

‘‘panel’’ the following phrase is added:

‘‘additional statistical analysis of the

patient data stratified by age and gender,’’.

5. On the same page, in the first full

paragraph, in the first line, ‘‘September

13, 1994’’ should read ‘‘October 5,

1994’’.

Dated: March 17, 1995.

Joseph A. Levitt,

Deputy Director for Regulations Policy, Center

for Devices and Radiological Health.

[FR Doc. 95–7744 Filed 3–30–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160–01–F

Health Care Financing Administration

[ORD–073–N]

New and Pending Demonstration

Project Proposals Submitted Pursuant

to Section 1115(a) of the Social

Security Act: January 1995

AGENCY: Health Care Financing

Administration (HCFA), HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: This notice lists new

proposals for demonstration projects

submitted to the Department of Health

and Human Services during the month

of January 1995 under the authority of

section 1115 of the Social Security Act.

This notice also lists approved,

disapproved and pending proposals.

COMMENTS: We will accept written

comments on these proposals. We will,

if feasible, acknowledge receipt of all

comments, but we will not provide

written responses to comments. We

will, however, neither approve nor

disapprove any new proposal for at least

30 days after the date of this notice to

allow time to receive and consider

comments. Direct comments as

indicated below.

ADDRESSES: Mail correspondence to:

Susan Anderson, Office of Research and

Demonstrations, Health Care Financing

Administration, 2230 Oak Meadows,

6325 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD

21207.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Susan Anderson, (410) 966–3996.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

Under Section 1115 of the Social

Security Act (the Act), the Department

of Health and Human Services (HHS)

may consider and approve research and

demonstration proposals with a broad

range of policy objectives. These

demonstrations can lead to

improvements in achieving the

purposes of the Act.

In exercising her discretionary

authority, the Secretary has developed a

number of policies and procedures for

reviewing proposals. On September 27,

1994, we published a notice in the

Federal Register (59 FR 49249) that

specified (1) the principles that we

ordinarily will consider when

approving or disapproving

demonstration projects under the

authority in section 1115(a) of the Act;

(2) the procedures we expect States to

use in involving the public in the

development of proposed demonstration

projects under section 1115; and (3) the

procedures we ordinarily will follow in

reviewing demonstration proposals. We

are committed to a thorough and

expeditious review of State requests to

conduct such demonstrations.

II. Listing of New and Pending

Proposals for the Month of January

1995

As part of our procedures, we are

publishing a monthly notice in the

Federal Register of all new submissions,

pending proposals, approvals, and

disapprovals. Proposals submitted in

response to a grant solicitation or other

competitive process will be reported as

received during the month that such

grant or bid is awarded, so as to prevent

interference with the awards process.

We have added a new category in this

notice entitled ‘‘Approved Grant

Proposals’’ to identify grant and

cooperative agreement awards for

development of demonstration projects

that may involve section 1115 authority.

A. Comprehensive Health Reform

Programs

1. New Proposals

Demonstration Title/State: Louisiana

Health Access—Louisiana.

Description: Louisiana proposes to

implement a fully capitated statewide

managed care program. A basic benefit

package and a behavioral health and

pharmacy wrap-around would be

administered through the managed care

plans. The State intends to expand

eligibility of persons with incomes up to

250 percent of the Federal poverty level

(FPL), with persons with incomes above

133 percent of the FPL paying all or a

portion of premiums. To fund the

demonstration, the State is seeking a

waiver of Federal Medical Assistance

Payments (FMAP) requirements, which

would effectively create a block grant

whereby the Federal share of the

demonstration would be fixed over the

course of the demonstration and the

State would assume the cost of increases

as they occurred.

Date Received: January 3, 1995.

State Contact: Carolyn Maggio,

Executive Director, Bureau of Research

and Development, Louisiana

Department of Health and Hospitals,

Post Office 2870, Baton Rouge,

Louisiana 70821–2871, (504) 342–2964.

Federal Project Officer: Gina Clemons,

Health Care Financing Administration,

Office of Research and Demonstrations,

2302 Oak Meadows, 6325 Security

Boulevard, Baltimore, Maryland 21207.

Demonstration Title/State:

SoonerCare—Oklahoma.

Description: Oklahoma proposes to

implement a 5-year statewide managed

care demonstration using both fully and

partially capitated delivery systems. The

emphasis of the program is to address

access problems in rural areas by

encouraging the development of ruralbased managed care initiatives. The

State will employ traditional fully

capitated managed care delivery models

for urban areas and will introduce a

series of partial capitation models in the

rural areas of the State. All currently

eligible, non-institutionalized

individuals will be enrolled during the

first two years of the project.

Date Received: January 6, 1995.

State Contact: Dr. Garth Splinter,

Oklahoma Health Care Authority,

Lincoln Plaza, 4545 N. Lincoln Blvd.,

Suite 124, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

73105.

Federal Project Officer: Helaine I.

Fingold, Health Care Financing