alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4364

Aisin World Corp. of America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
(June 13, 1990)

#### In the Matter of Linda C. Gucciardo, Respondent, v George Wolf et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the County of Suffolk, Respondents, and William Kelly, Appellant.

In a proceeding pursuant to Election Law article 16 to validate a petition nominating Linda C. Gucciardo as a candidate in the village election to be held on June 19, 1990, for the public office of Mayor of the Village of Asharoken, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Leis, J.), dated June 5, 1990, which granted the application.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

There is no merit to the appellant’s contention that the proceeding was not timely commenced. The petitioner commenced this proceeding to validate her nomination as an independent candidate for the public office of Mayor of the Village of Asharoken by order to show cause dated May 29, 1990, within seven days after the last day to file the petition for the election *(see,*Election Law § 16-102 [2]). In addition, service was effectuated upon the appellant in the manner specifically prescribed in the order to show cause. That manner of service gave adequate notice of the proceeding to the appellant and, therefore, was proper *(see,*Election Law § 16-102; *Matter of Pell v Coveney,*37 NY2d 494; *Matter of Fuentes v D’Apice,*122 AD2d 904; *see also, Matter of Berman v Board of Elections,*68 NY2d 761, 763; *Matter of Contessa v McCarthy,*40 NY2d 890, 891; *cf., Matter of Moore v Milhim,*109 AD2d 810).

*571The appellant further argues that the nominating petition is invalid because it was not "bound” as required by Election Law § 6-134 (2) when it was submitted to the Village Clerk. In this regard, the Supreme Court found, after a hearing, that the petition was stapled by the Village Clerk in the presence of the petitioner. This conclusion is supported by the record and should not be disturbed. We observe that village elections are governed by Election Law article 15 which does not contain a provision requiring that a nominating petition for village office be "bound” *(see,*Election Law § 15-108 [4]). Even assuming that Election Law § 6-134 (2) were applicable, the Village Clerk’s "use of staples of an adequate size, strength and number to securely fasten together [the petitioner’s eight-page nominating petition] constitutes strict compliance with the binding requirement of Election Law § 6-134 (2)” *(Matter of Jones v Scaringe,*143 AD2d 294, 295; *see, Matter of Braxton v Mahoney,*63 NY2d 691, 692; *cf., Matter of Bouldin v Scaringe,*133 AD2d 287).

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly validated the nominating petition. Brown, J. P., Lawrence, Kooper and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6173

SGRE, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 63 (Monday, April 3, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 16883]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8075]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Availability of an Environmental Assessment/Habitat Conservation 
Plan and Receipt of Application for Incidental Take Permit for 
Construction of One Single Family Residence on Lot 14, Block J, 9608 
Leaning Rock Circle, Long Canyon, Austin, Travis County, Texas

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice--Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Larry W. James (Applicant) has applied to the Fish and 
Wildlife Service (Service) for an incidental take permit pursuant to 
Section 10(a) of the Endangered Species Act (Act). The Applicant has 
been assigned permit number PRT-798674. The applicant has requested 
that the Federal Register notice published on March 16, 1995, be 
corrected to reflect the correct address. The construction of the one 
single-family residence will now occur at 9608 Leaning Rock Circle, Lot 
14, Block J, Long Canyon, Austin, Travis County, Texas.

DATES: Written comments on the application and EA/HCP should be 
received at the Ecological Services Field Office, Austin, Texas, by no 
later than April 17, 1995.
James A. Young,
Acting Regional Director, Region 2, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
[FR Doc. 95-8075 Filed 3-31-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-6000

Aisin World Corp. of America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RICARDO A. WHITING,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 329 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 31st day of October, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2736

Price Pump Company:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 67 (Friday, April 7, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 17775]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8622]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 033195B]


Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Pacific Fishery Management Council's (Council) Coastal 
Pelagic Species Plan Development Team and Advisory Subpanel will hold a 
public meeting on April 27, 1995, beginning at 10 a.m. at the NMFS 
Southwest Regional Office, 501 West Ocean Boulevard, Suite 4200, Long 
Beach, CA.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim Morgan, NMFS Southwest Regional 
Office at (310) 980-4036, or Larry Jacobson, NMFS Southwest Fisheries 
Science Center at (619) 546-7117.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the meeting is to review the 
draft Coastal Pelagic Species Fishery Management Plan (FMP), compile 
the preferred alternatives into a more concise document, review any 
problems identified at the Council's March 1995 meeting, and address 
any new concerns identified during the interim. The Council has 
scheduled final action on the draft FMP for its June 1995 meeting.
    This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Michelle Perry Sailer at (503) 326-6352 at least 
5 days prior to the meeting date.

    Dated: April 3, 1995.
Richard W. Surdi,
Acting Director, Office of Fisheries Conservation and Management, 
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 95-8622 Filed 4-6-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 52 (Friday, March 17, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 14484]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6722]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL COUNCIL ON DISABILITY


Quarterly Meeting

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the schedule and proposed agenda of the 
forthcoming quarterly meeting of the National Council on Disability. 
Notice of this meeting is required under Section 522b(e)(1) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, (P.L. 94-409).

DATES: April 18--April 20, 1995, 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

LOCATION: Radisson Barcelo Hotel Washington, 2121 P Street, NW., 
Washington, DC (202) 293-3100.

FOR INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark S. Quigley, Public Affairs Specialist, 
National Council on Disability, 1331 F Street, NW, Suite 1050, 
Washington, DC 20004-1107, Telephone: (202) 272-2004, (202) 272-2074 
(TT).

AGENCY MISSION: The National Council on Disability is an independent 
federal agency led by 15 members appointed by the President of the 
United States and confirmed by the U.S. Senate. The overall purpose of 
the National Council is to promote policies, programs, practices, and 
procedures that guarantee equal opportunity for all people with 
disabilities, regardless of the nature of severity of the disability; 
and to empower people with disabilities to achieve economic self-
sufficiency, independent living, and inclusion and integration into all 
aspects of society.

ACCOMMODATIONS: Those needing interpreters or other accommodations 
should notify the National Council on Disability by April 7, 1995.

ENVIRONMENTAL ILLNESS: People with environmental illness must reduce 
their exposure to volatile chemical substances in order to attend this 
meeting. In order to reduce such exposure, we ask that you not wear 
perfumes or scents at the meeting. We also ask that you smoke only in 
designated areas and the privacy of your room. Smoking is prohibited in 
the meeting room and surrounding area.

OPEN MEETING: This quarterly meeting of the National Council shall be 
open to the public.

AGENDA: The proposed agenda includes:

    Report from the Chairperson and the Executive Director
    Committee Meetings and Committee Reports
    ADA Town Meeting Tour Update
    Unfinished Business
    New Business
    Announcements
    Adjournment

    Records shall be kept of all National Council proceedings and shall 
be available after the meeting for public inspection at the National 
Council on Disability.

    Signed in Washington, DC, on March 14, 1995.
Speed Davis,
Acting Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 95-6722 Filed 3-15-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-BS-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         712,052
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,721,698
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  8,248,876
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            22,893,694
<PP&E>                                      16,636,756
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              59,080,789
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,959,247
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        44,986
<OTHER-SE>                                  32,200,549
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                59,080,789
<SALES>                                     76,330,563
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            76,330,563
<CGS>                                       63,224,285
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               63,224,285
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,327,193
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,085,511
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,780,535
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,802,216
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,978,319
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,978,319
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .67


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**SARBANES-OXLEY**

**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Dan W. Matthias, certify that:

 

       1.     Ihave reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the AnnualReport on Form 10-K of Mothers Work, Inc;

 

       2.     Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

       3.     Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

       4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

       (a)   Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

       (b)   Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

       (c)   Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

       5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors:

 

       (a)   Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

       (b)   Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

Date: October 4, 2005

 
| /s/ DAN W. MATTHIAS                      |   |
|------------------------------------------|--------|
| Dan W. Matthias*Chief Executive Officer* |   |

 

----
exv10w2






EXHIBIT 10.2




April 1, 2010




Travelport, LP

Travelport Global Distribution System B.V.

300 Galleria Parkway, N.W.

Atlanta, GA 30339





			
	Re:	 	Seventh Amendment to Subscriber Services Agreement, dated as of July 23, 2007 (“Agreement”)
between Travelport, LP, (f/k/a Travelport International, L.L.C., hereinafter “Travelport”),
Travelport Global Distribution System B.V. (f/k/a Galileo Nederland B.V., hereinafter “TGDS”
and, together with Travelport, collectively, “Galileo”) and Orbitz Worldwide, LLC
(“Subscriber”)





Ladies and Gentlemen:




This letter constitutes a Seventh Amendment (“Amendment”) to the Agreement referenced above.
Capitalized terms used in this Amendment and not otherwise defined shall be used as defined in the
Agreement.




Effective as April 1, 2010, (“Amendment Effective Date”), Galileo and Subscriber hereby agree as
follows:




1. Custom Terms and Conditions Revision. The Custom Terms and Conditions Attachment
(Galileo Services) – North America to the Agreement is amended as set forth in Exhibit A.




2. General. This Amendment shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of and be
enforceable by the Parties hereto or their successors in interest, except as expressly provided in
the Agreement. Each Party to this Amendment agrees that, other than as expressly set out in this
Amendment, nothing in this Amendment is intended to alter the rights, duties and obligations of the
Parties under the Agreement, which shall remain in full force and effect as amended hereby. In the
event of a conflict between the terms and conditions of this Amendment and the terms and conditions
of the Agreement, the terms and conditions of this Amendment shall govern. This Amendment may be
executed by the Parties in separate counterparts and each counterpart shall be deemed to be an
original, but all such counterparts together shall constitute one and the same instrument.




1









 








The Parties have caused this Amendment to be executed by the signatures of their respective
authorized representatives.




	 	 	 

	Orbitz Worldwide, LLC

	 	Travelport, LP
	 

	 	By: WS Holdings LLC as General Partner
	 
	 	 
	Signature: /s/ Stephen C. Praven                              

	 	Signature: /s/ Travis Christ                              
	 
	 	 
	Name: Stephen C. Praven

	 	Name: Travis Christ
	 
	 	 
	Title: VP, Business Development

	 	Title: President, Americas
	 
	 	 
	Date: 3/30/10

	 	Date: 4/1/10
	 
	 	 
	 

	 	Travelport Global Distribution System B.V.
	 
	 	 
	 

	 	Signature: /s/ Marco van Ieperen                              
	 
	 	 
	 

	 	Name: Marco van Ieperen
	 
	 	 
	 

	 	Title: Director
	 
	 	 
	 

	 	Date: 08.04.2010







2