alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 59 (Tuesday, March 28, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15941]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7569]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731-TA-711 (Final)]


Oil Country Tubular Goods (OCTG) From Argentina

AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Rescission of institution of final investigation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On March 8, 1995, the Commission received a letter from the 
U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) stating that it had amended its 
preliminary determination on OCTG from Argentina to correct for a 
ministerial error. Pursuant to this correction, Commerce has made a 
preliminary determination that OCTG from Argentina are not being sold 
at less than fair value within the meaning of the Tariff Act of 1930. 
Accordingly, the Commission rescinds its institution of a final 
investigation of OCTG from Argentina. However, because of the 
Commission's ongoing investigations on OCTG from Austria, Italy, Japan, 
and Korea, and because imports of OCTG from Argentina remain subject to 
investigation at Commerce, the Commission will continue its 
investigative activities, pending a final determination by Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 8, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Douglas Corkran (202-205-3177), Office 
of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street 
SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired individuals are advised 
that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the 
Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility 
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the 
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. 
Information can also be obtained by calling the Office of 
Investigations' remote bulletin board system for personal computers at 
202-205-1895 (N,8,1).

    Authority: The institution of this investigation is being 
rescinded under authority of the Tariff Act of 1930, title VII.

    Issued: March 22, 1995.

    By order of the Commission.
Donna R. Koehnke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-7569 Filed 3-27-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          30,171
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,554
<ALLOWANCES>                                       546
<INVENTORY>                                      1,744
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                39,470
<PP&E>                                         127,116
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,403
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 190,540
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,266
<BONDS>                                        208,006
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,152
<PREFERRED>                                         88
<COMMON>                                            93
<OTHER-SE>                                    (44,884)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   190,540
<SALES>                                          1,739
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,867
<CGS>                                              823
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,300
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,488
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,069
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,074
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (36,795)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (36,795)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (37,350)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (4.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (4.01)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of 800America.com, Inc., (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
U.S.  Securities  and  Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
David  E.  Rabi,  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Chief Financial Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.   1350,  as  added  by   906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

A.   The  Report  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

B.   The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects,  the  financial  condition and results of operations of the Bank.

Date:     November  11,  2002        By:

                                           /s/  David  E.  Rabi
                                           ---------------------------
                                           David  E.  Rabi, Chief Executive
                                           Officer and  Chief  Financial Officer

                                       16

<PAGE>
#### LETA ANDERSON v. W. J. ANDERSON

(Filed 27 November, 1957)

Divorce and Alimony § 12—

Findings, supported by evidence, to the effect that defendant had obtained an absolute divorce in another State prior to the institution of plaintiff’s action for alimony without divorce, and that such foreign judgment was binding in this State under the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the Federal Constitution, *held*to support the court’s order denying plaintiff’s motion for alimony *pendente lite*and counsel fees.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Preyer, J.,*in Chambers, March 9, 1957.

Civil action for alimony without divorce on the ground of abandonment and failure to provide necessary subsistence, G.S. 50-16. The action was instituted on April 3, 1954. By way of answer the defendant set up an absolute divorce decree granted by the Circuit Court of Duval County, Florida, on May 21, 1954. The plaintiff filed a reply in. which she denied the validity of the divorce and alleged that in obtaining it the defendant perpetrated a fraud upon the court. The plaintiff, upon proper motion in the cause, applied for alimony *'pendente lite*and counsel fees.

At the hearing of the motion, conflicting affidavits were introduced by the parties relative to the residence of W. J. Anderson in the State of Florida for the statutory period necessary to give the court of that State jurisdiction to try the divorce action. The defendant also introduced a copy of the divorce proceeding in the Circuit Court of Duval County, Florida.

Judge Preyer found the facts as to residence and as to the divorce decree as contended for by the defendant, and concluded the decree of absolute divorce entered by the Florida court was valid, entitled to full faith and credit in the State of North Carolina. From these findings the court entered an order denying the plaintiff’s motion for alimony *pendente lite*and counsel fees. To this order the plaintiff excepted, and from it appealed.

*Haivorth and Riggs, Thomas Turner, By: John Haworth for plaintiff appellant.*

*Robert M. Martin, James B. Lovelace for defendant appellee.*

*270Per Curiam.

The findings of Judge Preyer are supported by evidence. They are sufficient to and do support his order denying plaintiff’s motion for alimony *pendente lite*and counsel fees. The order of the Superior Court of Guilford County is

Affirmed.
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER PURSUANT TO
EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Activant Solutions Inc. for the three and
six months ended March 31, 2008;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
    5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors:
    By:
    /s/ KATHLEEN M. CRUSCOKathleen M. CruscoSenior Vice President and
Chief Financial officer
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-3489

Curtis Instruments, Puerto Rico, Inc: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bright Horizons Family Solutions (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
David Lissy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ David H. Lissy
-----------------------------
David H. Lissy
Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2002
##### 



Exhibit 10.1
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
  ARTICLE 1.
TERM OF EMPLOYMENT; DUTIES; NON-COMPETITION,
NON-SOLICITATION AND NON-DISCLOSURE
 1.01. Term of Employment .
 1.02. General Duties .
 1.03. Noncompetition, Nondisclosure and Nonsolicitation . Exhibit A
 ARTICLE 2.
COMPENSATION OF EMPLOYEE
 2.01. Annual Salary .
 -1-




---



##### 



2.02. Commencement Bonus .
 2.03. Benefits .
 2.04. Equity Incentives .
 Grant
 Acceleration Events
    -2-




---



##### 



ARTICLE 3.
TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT
 3.01. Termination Events.
 Termination Upon Death or Disability
 Termination For Cause or With or Without Good Reason
 Cause nolo contendere
 Termination With Good Reason
 -3-




---



##### 



Termination Without Good Reason
 3.02 Obligations of Employer Following Termination .
 Termination by Death or Disability
 Termination for Cause
 Termination or Non-Renewal by Employer Without Cause or by Employee With Good
Reason
 Termination by Employee Without Good Reason
 -4-




---



##### 



ARTICLE 4.
GENERAL PROVISIONS
 4.01. Notices .
  
  
  
  4.02 Entire Agreement.
 -5-




---



##### 



4.03. Law Governing Agreement; Consent to Jurisdiction . forum non conveniens
 4.04. Assignment .
  -6-




---



##### 



TWEETER HOME ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC.By:
    
    /s/ Joseph McGuireName:
    
    Joseph McGuireTitle:
    
    President/Chief Executive OfficerEMPLOYEE/s/ Gregory W. HuntGregory W. Hunt
 -7-




---



##### 



Exhibit A
 NONCOMPETITION, NONDISCLOSURE
AND NONSOLICITATION AGREEMENT
  I. BACKGROUND AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.
   II. NONCOMPETITION COVENANT.
   III. NONDISCLOSURE COVENANT.
  A-1




---



##### 



IV. GENERAL PROVISIONS.
 Notices
 
 A-2




---



##### 



Remedies Upon Breach
 No Waiver
 Severability
 A-3




---



##### 



Governing Law; Consent To Jurisdiction forum non conveniens
 Assignment by Employer
 Reasonableness of Provisions
 Miscellaneous
  A-4




---



##### 



TWEETER HOME ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC.By:
    
    /s/ Joseph McGuireName:
    
    Joseph McGuireTitle:
    
    President/Chief Executive OfficerEMPLOYEE/s/ Gregory W. HuntGregory W. Hunt
 A-5
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4077

Scosche Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
ex10-1.htm


Exhibit – 10.1  


 


Voltaire Gomez Resignation Letter












In respect of the Employment Agreement Dated, June 23 2010, between Roadships And Voltaire Gomez – because Mr. Gomez remain in employment for less than 90 Days – The parties hereby mutually agree that said employment agreement is null and void.


 


In lieu of said Employment Agreement, The parties have agreed to a sales purchase agreement; whereby Mr. Gomez  purchased the ten million shares for $1000 Dollars.


 







By: /s/Voltaire Gomez
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
                     -----------------------------



We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration
statements of UNION BANKSHARES, LTD. on Form S-8 relating to the
Company's Equity Incentive Plan, the Option Bonus Plan, the Equity
Compensation Plan for Nonemployee Directors and the Nonemployee
Directors' Stock Option Plan of our report dated January 17, 1997,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of UNION BANKSHARES, LTD.
as of December 31, 1996, and the related consolidated statements of
income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the year then ended,
which report appears in the December 31, 1996 annual report on Form
10-KSB of UNION BANKSHARES, LTD.



                              BAIRD, KURTZ & DOBSON
                              BAIRD, KURTZ & DOBSON



March 26, 1997
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 23






INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-90891 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement Nos. 33-71798, 33-93914 and
333-37955 on Form S-3 of Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. of our report dated
January 24, 2000 (March 20, 2000 as to the merger agreement with Spiros
Development Corporation II, Inc. described in Note 6), appearing in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 1999.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

San Diego, California
July 27, 2000
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3701

ECM Industries LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________ No. 95-30730

_______________________

MARINE OFFICE OF AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL, Plaintiffs,

versus VULCAN MV, her engines, tackle, etc.,ET AL,
Defendants.

____________________________________________ ASHLAND CEMENT CORPORATION INCORPORATED, Plaintiff- Appellant Cross-Appellee,

versus THE MV VULCAN, her engines, tackle apparel, furniture, etc. in rem. Defendant-Appellee

RONDEL SHIPPING LTD. Defendant-Appellee Cross-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

(92-CV-456)

_________________________________________________________________ October 23, 1996* District Judge for the Western District of Texas, sitting by

designation.

* * Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.
2 Before JONES, and WIENER, Circuit Judges, and FERGUSON * , District Judge.

PER CURIAM: **

The court has considered the parties’ appeals in light of
the briefs, oral arguments and pertinent portions of the record. Having done so, we find no reversible error of fact or law and so
affirm the judgment of the district court. S ee Fifth Circuit Local
Rule 47.6.
Further, the notice of appeal filed by Rondel Shipping
Ltd. did not sufficiently identify the M/V VULCAN as a crossappellant in rem . It is not “otherwise clear from the notice” filed by Rondel that the VULCAN in remwas a party to the appeal. Consequently, pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 3(c), the notice did not
include the vessel’s intent to appeal in rem . The VULCAN’s appeal
is DISMISSED

. A ll Pacific Trading, Inc. v. Vessel M/V Hanjin Yosu , 7 F.3d 1427 (9th Cir. 1993), cert. denied , 510 U.S. 1194 (1994).