alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
clavis_s1a-ex1013.htm











Exhibit 10.13


 


 


Abstract for the loan agreement with Seong Hun Han


 



	
Parties of the an agreement

	
Seong Hun Han, Clavis Technologies


	
The date of an agreement

	
2010.04.16


	
The amount of loan

	
\ 100,000,000


	
The date of repayment

	
2010.11.30


	
The interest

	
\ 1,700,000/month


	
Contents of the contract

	
- Clavis can prepay the loan at any time.


- When Clavis prepays the loan, this agreement will expire.


- If the Clavis cannot pay lender back by November 2010, then Clavis needs to negotiate with Seong Hun Han for an extension.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 52 (Friday, March 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 14452]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6653]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-30,366]


H & R Blocks, Forks, WA; Notice of Revised Determination on 
Reopening

    On March 8, 1995, the Department, on its own motion, reopened its 
investigation for the former workers of the subject firm.
    The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination on 
November 22, 1994 for workers at the subject firm. The denial notice 
was published in the Federal Register on December 16, 1994 (59 FR 
65076).
    The findings show that H & R Blocks had reduced sales in 1993 
compared to 1992 and all workers were laid off on December 31, 1993. 
New findings show a late response indicating that the subject firm's 
sole customer had increased its reliance on imports in 1994 from 1993 
while decreasing its purchases from the subject firm.

Conclusion

    After careful consideration of the new facts obtained on reopening, 
it is concluded that increased imports of articles like or directly 
competitive with cedar shakes and shingles produced by the subject firm 
contributed importantly to the decline in sales and to the total or 
partial separation of workers at the subject firm. In accordance with 
the provisions of the Trade Act of 1974, I make the following revised 
determination:

    All former workers of H & R Blocks in Forks, Washington who 
became totally or partially separated from employment on or after 
September 20, 1993 are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance 
under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 8th day of March 1995.
Victor J. Trunzo,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 95-6653 Filed 3-16-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
EXHIBIT 32
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Salisbury  Bancorp,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John F.
Perotti,  Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  and I, John F. Foley,  Chief
Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ John F. Perotti                             /s/ John F. Foley
-------------------                             -----------------
    John F. Perotti                                 John F. Foley
    Chief Executive Officer                         Chief Financial Officer

Date:  May 12, 2008
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2581

JAE Electronics, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SIMIONE CENTRAL HOLDINGS, INC. FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,217,254
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,579,462
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,376,895
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,045,072
<PP&E>                                       2,662,431
<DEPRECIATION>                                 930,470
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,358,208
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,116,206
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,107
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,896,325
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,358,208
<SALES>                                     22,667,507
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,667,507
<CGS>                                       10,989,583
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,989,583
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,358,530
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             100,380
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,219,014
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,219,014
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,219,014
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .17


</TABLE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4337

Aisin World Corp. of America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors
General Growth Properties, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-11067, 333-15907, 333-17021, 333-23035, 333-37247, 333-37383,
333-41603, 333-58045, 333-68505, 333-76379, 333-76757, 333-82134, 333-82569,
333-84419, 333-88813, 333-88819, 333-91621, 333-115693, 333-115694, 333-120373,
333-139349, and 333-145649) on Form S-3 and the registration statements (Nos.
33-79372, 333-07241, 333-11237, 333-28449, 333-74461, 333-79737, 333-105882,
333-125605, and 333-144214) on Form S-8 of General Growth Properties, Inc. of
our report dated February 27, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance
sheets of GGP/Homart, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005,
and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income,
stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2006, our report dated February 22, 2008,
with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of GGP/Homart II L.L.C. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated
statements of income and comprehensive income, changes in members' capital and
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
2007, and our report dated February 22, 2008, with respect to the consolidated
balance sheets of GGP - TRS L.L.C. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and
2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in members'
capital and cash flows for the years then ended, which reports appear in the
December 31, 2007 annual report on Form 10-K of General Growth Properties, Inc.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
February 22, 2008
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 65 (Wednesday, April 5, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 17370]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8243]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--PERF Project 93-20 Bench Scale Valve Research 
Forum

    Notice is hereby given that, on December 8, 1994, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Petroleum Environmental 
Research Forum (``PERF'') Project 93-20, titled ``Bench Scale Valve 
Emission Study'' has filed written notifications simultaneously with 
the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) 
the identities of the parties and (2) the nature and objectives of the 
project. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the 
Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances. Pursuant to Section 6(b) 
of the Act, the identities of the parties are: Exxon Research and 
Engineering Company, Florham Park, NJ; Texaco, Incorporated, Port 
Arthur, TX; Phillips Petroleum Company, Bartlesville, OK; Amoco Oil 
Company, Naperville, IL; Chevron Research & Technology, Richmond, CA; 
Mobil Research and Development Corporation, Pennington, NJ; Velan, 
Incorporated, Grandy, Quebec-CANADA; Kitz Corporation of America, 
Houston, TX; Grinnell Corporation, Cranston, RI; B.P. Research, 
Cleveland, OH; Garlock, Palmyra, NY; and Grove Valve & Regulatory 
Company, Oakland, CA.
    The nature and objectives of the research program include the 
reduction of costs associated with the meeting of valve fugitive 
emissions regulations by optimizing valve mechanical specifications.
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 95-8243 Filed 4-4-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
```
Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinionsho uld not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except und er the limit ed circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 09- 10735 Su m m ar y C al endar
BR END A L EE F OR D , Pet i t i o ne r - Appe l l ant
v. W A R D E N E L A IN E C H A P M A N , F e d e r a l M e d ic a l C e n te r -C a r s w e ll, R espon den t
- A pp el l ee
A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e N ort h ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 4: 09- C V

- 145
B ef ore G A R Z A , C L E M E N T , an d O W E N , C i rcui t Ju dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * B rend a L ee F ord, federal pri soner # 262 55-077, w as sentenced to a 3 2 4 -m on th term of i m p ri son m en t fol l ow i n g a 19 9 5 con victi on f or co n sp i ra cy to p oss ess w i th i n ten t to d i stri b u te coca i n e a n d po sse ssion w i th i n ten t t o d i stri b u te c oc ai ne. For d has appeal ed t he di st r i c t cour t ’ s di sm i ss alof her28 U
. S. C
. § 2241 p eti ti on ch a l l en gin g th e m eth od u sed by the B u rea u of P ri son s ( B O P ) to com p u te th e g o o d tim e cr e d it a g a in s t h e r s e n te n c e a u th o r iz e d b y 1 8 U .S .C . § 3 6 2 4 (b ). United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D Ma rc h 24, 2010 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk Case: 09-10735 Document: 00511061365 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/24/2010N o. 09- 10735

Under our case law, 18 U.S.C. § 3 624 (b) “ makes cl ear that good time credit must be 1 earn ed by a prison er o n an annualba sis; itis not awardedinadvanc e.” Sam ple , 40 6 F .3d at 312 . Ac c ordin gly, a c ase all eging lo ss of good time credit b ecomes ripe when the all eged a cc ru edc re dit cr eate s an“im me di atein j ury” toth e pris on erth at thisc ourtc ouldr edre ss. 2 R e g a r d le s s w h e t h e r F o r d ’s s e n t e n c e i s c o m p u t e d o n th e b a s is o f t h e B O P ’s i nt e r pr e t at i o n o f

§ 3 62 4(b) o r he r o w n, Fo r d’ s r e l e as e i s no t i m m i ne nt . I n l i ght of t he “ t em por al l y di st ant and s pec ul at i ve nat ure of [ Ford’ s] c l ai m , ” s he has failed to e stabl i sh an “ i m m edi ate i nj u ry” t h at w ou l d be redressed by the rel i ef th a t s h e s e e k s . S ee S amplev. Morri son , 4 0 6 F .3 d 3 1 0 , 3 1 2 (5 th C ir . 2 0 0 5 ). W e c o nc l ude t hatF o r d’ s § 224 1 pe t i t i o n i s no t r i pe f o r r e vi e w , a nd we di s m i s s t he

1 ap pe alf o r l ac k o f

s ubj e c t m at t e r j ur i s di c t i o n. A P P E A L D IS M IS S E D
. Case: 09-10735 Document: 00511061365 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/24/2010
ex10_1.htm


 


EXHIBIT 10.1


 


SECOND AMENDMENT TO







EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT












Second Amendment (the “Amendment”), to the Employment Agreement, dated as of February 26, 2008 (as amended, the “Agreement”), by and between The LaPorte Savings Bank (the “Bank”) and Lee A. Brady (the “Executive”) is effective as of July 12, 2011.  Capitalized terms which are not defined herein shall have the same meaning as set forth in the Agreement.







W I T N E S S E T H:







WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Agreement to reflect that the Executive will continue to serve as Chief Executive Officer but no longer serve as President of the Company and Bank; and







NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the mutual agreements herein set forth and such other consideration the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Bank and the Executive hereby agree as follows:







Section 1.  All References to President and Chief Executive Officer shall be changed to Chief Executive Officer.  The Agreement is amended to replace all references to “President and Chief Executive Officer” with “Chief Executive Officer.”







Section 2.  Effectiveness.  This Amendment shall be deemed effective as of the date above written, as if executed on such date.  Except as expressly set forth herein, this Amendment shall not by implication or otherwise alter, modify, amend or in any way affect any of the terms, conditions, obligations, covenants or agreements contained in the Agreement, all of which are ratified and affirmed in all respects and shall continue in full force and effect and shall be otherwise unaffected.







Section 3.  Governing Law.  This Amendment and the rights and obligations hereunder shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Indiana.







Section 4.  Counterparts.  This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall for all purposes be deemed an original, and all of which together shall constitute but one and the same instrument.











  





  











  








 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Bank and the Executive have duly executed this Amendment as of the day and year first written above.








	  	
THE LAPORTE SAVINGS BANK


	  	  
	  	  
	
By:   

	/s/ Mark A. Krentz  
	  	
Name: Mark A. Krentz


	  	
Title: Secretary of Board


	  	  
	  	  
	  	
LAPORTE BANCORP, INC.


	  	  
	  	  
	
By:   

	/s/ Paul G. Fenker  
	  	
Name: Paul G. Fenker


	  	
Title: Chairman of Board


	  	  
	  	  
	  	
EXECUTIVE


	  	  
	  	  
	  	
/s/ Lee A. Brady


	  	
Lee A. Brady
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

June 26, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00324

- CV

MADHAVAN A. PISHARODI, M.D., P.A., Appellant

v.

UNITED BIOLOGICS, L.L.C

, Appellee

From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CI06067 Honorable Rosie Alvarado, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The clerk ’ s record was due June 1 9 , 2018 , but was not filed. On June 22, 2018 , the clerk filed a notification of late record stating the clerk ’ s record was not filed because appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the clerk ’ s fee to prepare the record and appellant is not entitled to the record without paying the fee.

Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to provide written proof to this court on or before July 6, 2018 that ei ther (1) the clerk ’ s fee has been paid or arrangements satisfactory to the clerk have been made to pay the clerk ’ s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to the clerk ’ s record without prepayment of the clerk ’ s fee. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.1

, 35.3(a). If appell ant fails to file such proof within the time provided, this appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. See id. R. 37.3(b).

We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on all counsel, the court reporter, and the district clerk.

_________________________________ Marial yn Barnard, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 26th day of June, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEI TH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3157

Viavi Solutions Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
ORM NAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Nv- 03610

IN THE MATTER OF THE AUTHORIZATION

OF A RETIRED JUDGE TO PERFORM

A MARRIAGE CEREMONY

ORDER

FILE

AUG 2 4 2020

The Honorable Mike Salvagni, Retired District Judge, having retired under the

judges' retirement system as provided by law and having requested authorization to

perform a marriage ceremony,

IT IS ORDERED that the Honorable Mike Salvagni is hereby called to duty as a

district judge to perform a marriage ceremony uniting Thomas William Hamilton and

Misti Lorena Andersen on September 18, 2020, in Gallatin County, Montana.

This Order is entered by the Chief Justice pursuant to Article VII of the

Constitution of the State of Montana and statutes enacted in conformity therewith and in

implementation thereof.

The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to the Honorable Mike

Salvagni.

DATED this 1-s-k day of August, 2020.

„e

Chief Justice

08/24/2020

Case Number: PR 06-0356