alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3065

Mabuchi Motor America Corp:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_05.09.19.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4936 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4936

To amend the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 to repeal restrictions on 
                         offshore wind leasing.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 26, 2023

 Ms. Ocasio-Cortez (for herself, Ms. Ross, Mr. Grijalva, Ms. Kamlager-
   Dove, Ms. Clarke of New York, Ms. Norton, Mr. Tonko, Mr. Scott of 
    Virginia, Ms. McCollum, Ms. Lee of California, Mr. Cleaver, Mr. 
 Huffman, Mr. Carbajal, Ms. Lee of Pennsylvania, Mr. Ivey, Mr. Bowman, 
Mr. Beyer, Ms. Tlaib, Ms. Castor of Florida, Ms. Velazquez, Mr. Trone, 
Mr. Panetta, Mr. Mullin, Mr. Pallone, Mr. Espaillat, and Mrs. Foushee) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 to repeal restrictions on 
                         offshore wind leasing.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Nonrestrictive Offshore Wind Act'' 
or the ``NOW Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF OFFSHORE WIND LEASING RESTRICTIONS.

    Paragraph (2) of section 50265(b) of Public Law 117-169 (43 U.S.C. 
3006(b)) is repealed.
                                 <all>
```
### NUMBER S 13
- 18
- 003 53
- C R AND 13
- 18
- 00354
- CR 

## COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI
- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ CHARLES NICKOLOUS LI NZEY , Appellant,

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee.

__________________________________ __________________________

On a ppeal from the 33rd District Court of Burnet County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________ 

## O R D E R
Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justic es Benavides and Hinojosa Order Per Curiam

Th ese cause s are before the Court on appellant ’ s amended motion to abate or to
extend time to file brief. 1 State’s Exhibit Number 41 , an audio recording, is not included

1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the Third Court of Appeals in Austin pursuant to a docket equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See T EX . G OV ' T C ODE A NN . § 73.001 (West, Westlaw through 2017 1st C.S.).2

in the reporter’s record. The Court reporter has notified this Court that she has reviewed the original Exhibit 41 and the file does not function and is unable to be copied. Appellant is requesting that this Court abate these appeals so the defect in the record may be cured by replacement of the exhibit or agreement of the parties. Appellant’s motion is GRANTED. T he se appeal s are ABATED and the matter is REMANDED to the trial court. In accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.6(f)(4), the trial court is directed to conduct a hearing to determine: (1) if the appellant has timely requested a reporter's record; (2) if, without the appellant's fault, a significant exhibit or a significant portion of the court reporter's notes and records has been lost or destroyed or

- if the proceedings were electronically recorded

- a significant portion of the recording has been lost or destroyed or is inaudible; (3) if the lost, destroyed, or inaudible portion of the reporter's record, or the lost and destroyed exhibit, is necessary to the appeal's resolution; and (4) if the lost, destroyed, or inaudible portion of the reporter's record cannot be replaced by agreement of the parties, or the lost or destroyed exhibit cannot be replaced either by agreement of the parties or with a copy determined by the trial court to accurately duplicate with reasonable certainty the orig inal exhibit. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 34.6(f). The trial court is directed to forward the record of the proceedings, including any orders and findings, to this Court within thirty (30) days of the date of this order, or to notify this Court within such period indicating a date by which the trial court can comply. Appellant ’ s motion for extension of time to file the brief is hereby GRANTED pending resolution of the matters referenced herein.3

It is so ordered.
PER CURIAM
D elivered and filed th e 22 nd day of Ap ril , 2019

.
Thi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on a nd i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

The pane l unani m ous l y f i nds thi s c a s e s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on w i thout ** o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed . R . A p p . P . 3 4 (a) (2). j l f/ Inv en t o ry NOT F OR P UB L I CA T I ON

UN I TE D STATE S COURT OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CI RCUI T M ARI A CO RALI A BA RRERA CORTEZ , A K A M ar i a C ort ez , M ar i a C ora l i a C ort ez , P et i t i o n er, v. E R IC H . H O L D E R J r., A tto rn e y G e n e ra l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 74032 A ge nc y N o. A 094- 447- 907 M E M OR AN DU M *

O n Pet i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ard o f I m m ig ra tio n A p p e a ls Subm i tt e d N ove m be r17, 2009 ** B efore: A L A R C Ó N , T R O T T , A N D T A S H IM A , C i rcuitJu d g es. M ar i aB arr e r aC ort e z , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of El Sal va dor , pe t i t i ons f or r e vi e w of

the B oar d of

I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ' de c i s i on a f f i rm i ng the i m m i gr a t i on 

# FI L ED NOV 30 2009 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U . S. C O U R T O F AP PE ALSj l f

/ I nvent ory 08- 74032 2 j udge ' s de ni a l of

he rappl i c a t i on f

ora s yl um , w i thhol di ng of r e m ova l , a nd pr ot e c t i on unde rthe C onve nt i on A ga i ns tTortur e ( " C A T") . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on u n d e r8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e r e v ie w f o rs ub s ta n ti a l e v id e n c e , Sa ntos-L em us v. Mukasey , 5 4 2 F . 3 d7 3 8 , 7 4 2 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 8 ) , a n dwe d e n y th e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T he r ec ord do es no tcom pel r ever sa l of the I J' s c on clusi on thatpet i t i on er f a i l e dt o e s t ab l i s h th a tth e h arm s h e s u f f e r e da tth e h an d s o f

g an g me mbe r s i n El S a lv a d o rw a s o n a c c o u n t o f ap r o te c te dg r o u n d . See Ra m os-L op ezv. H older , 563 F. 3d 855, 858- 62 ( 9th C i r . 2009) ( c onc l udi ng thatr e s i s t anc e t o ga ng a c t i vi ty i s not a part i cul arsoci algroup f or the pu rpo se of e st abl i shi ng nexu s t o a prot ec t ed g ro u n d ); Mo l i n a -Mo ra les v . I NS , 23 7 F . 3d 10 48 , 10 51 - 52 ( 9th C i r . 20 01 ) ( per sonal r e tr i but i on i s notpe r s e c ut i on on a c c ountof apr ot e c t e d gr ound) . A c c or di ngl y, p e titio n e r' s a s y lu m , w ith h o ld in g o f r e m o v a l, an dC A T c la im s fa il. W e l a c k j ur i s di c t i on t o r e vi e w pe t i t i one r ' s due pr oc e s s c ont e nt i on, r e ga r di ng the I J' s a cc ept ance of pet i t i on er ' s pr off er ed as yl um st at em enti n l i eu of di r ec t te s ti m o n y , b e c au s e s h e d id n o t e x h au s t i t b e f o r e th e B I A . Se e B a rr o n v . A s h c r o ft , 3 5 8 F . 3 d6 7 4 , 6 7 8 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 4 ). P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D E N IE D i n p a rt; D IS M IS S E D i n p a rt.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

August 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4434

David C. Poole Company:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-3464

Nissan North America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

“Made in China 2025” or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

 

I, David R. Tinkham, Chief Financial Officer of Horizon GroupProperties, Inc., certify that:

 

1.     Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Horizon Group Properties,Inc.;

 

2.     Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.     Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)     Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made know to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)    Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)     Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)   Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)    Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Dated: |  November 14, 2003 |   | /s/ David R. Tinkham    |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   |                    |   | David R. Tinkham        |   |
|   |                    |   | Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

1

----
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Marlon CARSON, Defendant/Appellant.

No. 66216.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Feb. 28, 1995.

Doug R. Hoff, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Elizabeth L. Ziegler, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and CRANDALL and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of possession of a controlled substance, § 195.202, RSMo Supp.1993. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4705

II-VI Incorporated:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

“Made in China 2025” or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2928

NSK Corporation:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4732

Arrowhead Electrical Products, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 59 (Tuesday, March 28, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15933]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7519]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Otis Truman Arnold, et al.; Change in Bank Control Notices; 
Acquisitions of Shares of Banks or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. Once the notices have been accepted for 
processing, they will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later 
than April 11, 1995.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (Genie D. Short, Vice President) 
2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Otis Truman and Anita Ray Arnold, both of Texarkana, Texas; to 
acquire a total of 49.1 percent of the voting shares of New Boston 
Bancshares, Inc., New Boston, Texas, and thereby indirectly acquire 
First National Bank of New Boston, New Boston, Texas.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Kenneth R. Binning, 
Director, Bank Holding Company) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, 
California 94105:
    1. James Lester Ryan, Orinda, California; to acquire an additional 
2.32 percent, for a total of 10.65 percent, of the voting shares of BWC 
Corp., Walnut Creek, California, and thereby indirectly acquire Bank of 
Walnut Creek, Walnut Creek, California.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 22, 
1995.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-7519 Filed 3-27-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F