alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

April 12, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3748

ECM Industries LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_04.15.19.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3563

Scosche Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
I, Joseph G. McGuire, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Tweeter Home Entertainment Group, Inc.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonable likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: February 9, 2005   /s/ Joseph G. McGuire   Chief Financial Officer & Senior Vice-President
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PATRICK JAMES CARRIZOSA, Jr.,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

JEANNE S. WOODFORD, Director of

CA Department of Corrections,

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 08-56557

D.C. No. 3:05-cv-01935-IEG

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Irma E. Gonzalez, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 29, 2010** 

Before: ALARCÓN, LEAVY, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Patrick James Carrizosa, Jr., appeals pro se from the

district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have 

FILED

JUL 20 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 We certify for appeal on our own motion the issues presented in this 1

appeal. 

2 08-56557

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm. 1

Carrizosa contends that the State’s failure to award him day-for-day

sentence credits violated his due process rights. However, Cal. Penal Code 

§ 2933.1 limits the sentence credits Carrizosa may earn through his participation in

the Inmate Work Training Incentive Program to fifteen percent. The other state

statutes and regulations cited by Carrizosa do not create a protected due process

liberty interest in sentence credits. See Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472, 483-85

(1995); McLean v. Crabtree, 173 F.3d 1176, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 1999). 

To the extent Carrizosa challenges the state court’s application of state law

concerning equitable estoppel, this contention does not state a cognizable claim of

a violation of federal law. See Lewis v. Jeffers, 497 U.S. 764, 780 (1990)

(“[F]ederal habeas corpus relief does not lie for errors of state law[.]”). 

Furthermore, the district court correctly rejected Carrizosa’s government estoppel

argument on the merits. 

Finally, the district court properly rejected Carrizosa’s equal protection

claim. The record reflects that the documentary evidence submitted by Carrizosa

did not establish that he was treated differently from similarly situated individuals.
3 08-56557

See McLean, 173 F.3d at 1185. 

Thus, the California courts’ rejection of Carrizosa’s claims was neither

contrary to nor an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law. See

28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1). Moreover, because Carrizosa failed to raise a colorable

claim for relief, see Phillips v. Woodford, 267 F.3d 966, 973 (9th Cir. 2001), his

contention that he is entitled to an evidentiary hearing on his claims lacks merit. 

AFFIRMED.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT FR ANC ISC O ALVAR O-IR AETA, Pe titione r, v. LORETTA E. LYNC H, Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde nt . No. 12-71287 Age n c y No. A071-644-613 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d August 25, 2015 ** B e fore : M c KEOW

N , C LIFTON, a

nd HUR W ITZ, C irc u it Judge s. The 90-da

y sta y of proc e e dings in this c a s e e xpire d on July 7, 2015. Thus, re sponde nt’ s m otion to lift the sta y is de nie d a s m oot. Franc isc o Alva

ro-Ira e ta , a

native and c itiz e n of El Sa lva dor, pe titions for re vie w of the B oa

rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ orde r dism issing his a p pe a l from

an 

# FIL ED SEP 04 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).im

m igration judge ’ s (“ IJ” ) de c ision de ny ing his a pplic ation for a sy lum , withholding of rem o v a l, a nd prote c tion unde r the C onve ntion Against Torture (“ C AT” ). W e have jurisdic tion unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re vie w for substa ntia l e vide nc e the a ge nc y ’ s fa c tua l findings, inc luding a dve rse c re dibility findings. C he bc houb v . IN

S , 257 F.3d 1038, 1042 (9th C ir.2001). W e de ny the pe tition for re vie w. Substa ntia l e v i de nc e supports the a ge nc y ’ s a dve rse c re dibility de t e rm ination ba se d on the inc onsiste nc ie s be twe e n Alva ro-Ira e ta ’ s a sy lum

a pplic at ion a

nd his te stim ony re ga rding e ve nts in El Salva dor a nd his re a son for fle e ing. Se e C e ballos-C astillo v. IN

S , 904 F.2d 519, 520 (9th C ir. 1990); Zamanov v . Holde r , 649 F.3d 969, 973 (9th C ir. 2011). W e re je c t Alva ro-Ira e ta ’ s c onte ntion tha t the IJ fa ile d to prope rly

c onside r his e xpla

n ations for theinc onsiste nc ie s. Se eZamanov , 649 F.3d a

t 974. In thea

bse nc e of c re dible te stim o ny , Alva ro-Ira e ta ’ s a sy lum

and withholding of rem o v a l c la im s fa il. Se eFarah v . Ashc roft , 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th C ir. 2003). Alva ro-Ira e ta doe s not ra ise any

argum e nts c ha lle nging thea ge nc y ’ s de nia l of C AT re lie f. Se eMartine z-Se rrano v . IN

S , 94 F.3d 1256, 1259 (9th C ir. 1996) (issue s not supporte d by

argum e nt a

re de e m e d a

ba ndone d). PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D . 1 2 - 7 1 2 8 7 2
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 59 (Tuesday, March 28, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15931]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7578]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY


Availability of FEMA-REP-11, Revision

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FEMA announces the availability of the document ``A Guide to 
Preparing Public Information Materials and Emergency Alert System 
Instructions for Radiological Emergencies,'' FEMA-REP-11, Revision, and 
requests comments on the document.

DATES: Comments and responses should be sent no later than June 26, 
1994.

ADDRESSES: Comments on ``FEMA-REP-11, Revision'' should be sent to the 
Rules Docket Clerk, Office of the General Counsel, room 840, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, 
(facsimile) (202) 646-4536.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William F. McNutt, Senior Policy 
Advisor, Preparedness and Policy Branch, Preparedness, Training and 
Exercises Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C 
Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2857.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FEMA-REP-11 was first published in June 
1987. This document provided assistance to State and local governments 
and Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensees in the development of 
emergency public information materials. This revision continues to 
provide such assistance, and provides additional guidance on the 
development, review, and evaluation of emergency broadcast messages for 
the public. Our intent is to help responsible organizations to alert 
the public and to provide emergency instructions and information on the 
classification of an emergency, the populations and areas potentially 
affected, and the protective measures that may be necessary. We welcome 
your comments on this document.

    Dated: March 20, 1995.
Kay C. Goss,
Associate Director for Preparedness, Training, and Exercises.
[FR Doc. 95-7578 Filed 3-27-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-20-P
1 In The


### Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________ NO

. 09

- 1 3

- 00 545

- C V NO. 09

- 1 3

- 00 546

- C V NO. 09

- 1 3

- 00 547

- C V NO. 09

- 1 3

- 00 548

- C V



### ____________________

TOMMIE ALLEN RINGO , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

_______________________________________________________ ______________
On A ppeal from the 1A District Court Jasper County, Texas Trial Cause No s . 33434, 33437, 33440, and 33441

________________________________________________________ _____________
ORDER

The trial court signed expunction orders in four criminal cases on September

27, 2013. Tommie Allen Ringo filed notices of appeal on December 2, 2013. In

motions filed with the trial court, Ringo claims that he received notice or actual

knowledge of the signing more than twenty days after the orders were signed. See

Tex. R. Civ. P. 306a.4. The documents filed with the appeal do not show whether2 the trial court considered and ruled on the moti on s

. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 306a.5; see

also Tex. R. App. P. 4.2(c).

It is, therefore, ORDERED that t he appeals are hereby abated and the cases

are remanded to the trial court for consideration of the appellant’s motions to

establish the application of Te xas Rule of Civil Procedure 306a.4. A supplemental

clerk’s record that includes the trial court’s rulings and a supplemental reporter’s

record of any hearing conducted by the trial court shall be filed with the Court of

Appeals on or before March 10, 2014

.

ORDER ENTERED February 6, 2014

.

PER CURIAM

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4394 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4394

 To modify the minimum required weight of orange juice soluble solids.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 14, 2022

    Mr. Rubio (for himself and Mr. Scott of Florida) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                 Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To modify the minimum required weight of orange juice soluble solids.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Defending Domestic Orange Juice 
Production Act''.

SEC. 2. REVISION OF PASTEURIZED ORANGE JUICE STANDARDS.

    (a) In General.--Effective on the date of enactment of this Act, 
the standard of identity for ``pasteurized orange juice'', established 
in section 146.140 of title 21, Code of Federal Regulations, shall be 
deemed to require finished pasteurized orange juice to contain not less 
than 10.0 percent by weight of orange juice soluble solids, exclusive 
of the solids of any added optional sweetening ingredients.
    (b) Regulation Authority.--Nothing in this section shall be 
construed to limit the authority of the Secretary of Health and Human 
Services to promulgate regulations to amend the standard of identity 
for pasteurized orange juice.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
Campo Electronics, Appliances, and Computers, Inc. on Form S-8  (File No. 33-
56796)  of our  report  dated  November 1, 1996, except for Notes 4 and 5 for 
which the date is December 6, 1996, on our audits of the financial
statements  of  Campo  Electronics,  Appliances, and Computers,  Inc.  as  of 
August 31, 1996 and 1995, and  for the years ended August 31, 1996, 1995, and 
1994, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


/s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.

COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.


New Orleans, Louisiana
December 16, 1996
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-4551

Zipline International Inc: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXHIBIT 32.2


                    Certification of Interim CFO Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of GAMCO Investors, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), John
C. Ferrara, as Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ John C. Ferrara
-------------------
Name:   John C. Ferrara
Title:  Interim Chief Financial Officer
Date:   April 13, 2007

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
MOTOR MODEL: RS775

VIEW 1 VIEW 2 VIEW 3
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2776

Speck Pumps-Pool Products, Inc: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions.

pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
FOURTH SUPPLEMENT TO THE

                    CONFIDENTIAL PRIVATE PLACEMENT MEMORANDUM

                                   May 2, 2000

                   FLORIDA LITHOTRIPTERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I

                                2008 Litho Place

                       Fayetteville, North Carolina 28304

                  Florida Lithotripters Limited Partnership I, a Florida limited
partnership (the  "Partnership"),  hereby  supplements its Confidential  Private
Placement  Memorandum of February 25, 2000, as supplemented  (collectively,  the
"Memorandum").  Capitalized  terms  used  herein  are  defined  in the  Glossary
appearing  in  the  Memorandum.  All  persons  who  have  subscribed  for or are
considering  an  investment  in  the  Units  offered  by the  Memorandum  should
carefully review this Supplement.

Extension of the Offering

                  Pursuant to the authority  reserved by the General  Partner in
the Memorandum,  the General Partner hereby elects to extend the Closing Date to
May 15,  2000 (or such  earlier  date as the  General  Partner  may, in its sole
discretion, otherwise elect).

     Questions   concerning  this  Supplement  should  be  directed  to  MedTech
Investments,  Inc.,  2008  Litho  Place,  Fayetteville,  North  Carolina  28304.
MedTech's telephone number is (800) 682-7971.