alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3998

Cummins Allison Corp:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
PUBLIC VERSION Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
$[*********] [******]

$[*********]

INPUT

20.0

$[*********]

[******]

[******]

0.05

PUBLIC VERSION
Consistent with USTR's Section 301 notice, OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. requests

confidential treatment for the information designated as business confidential in this submission. Such

information consists of information that would not customarily be released to the public, including

business or trade secrets regarding production costs and processes, data on sales, product characteristics

customers, destinations, and other product, sales, and cost-related business secrets. Business confidential

information has been indicated herein by enclosing it in single brackets (“[ ]”). A public version of these

comments is also being filed with all confidential information removed.

OMRON in the US is the only designer of this product and only supplier of this component.

AT SHIFTER SWITCH is a molded plastic switch actuator, and is used only for automotive purposes in

transmission shifting, of which is an OEM-specified dimension. It is only used for further assembly of

components which go into domestic automobile production, which is specified by auto manufacturer.

This product is not a target of the US Administration's 301 investigation regarding Intellectual Property

concerns. This is not a concern to IP transfer and impressment. This product contains no IP of interest

related to autonomous vehicle production.

The tariff action ultimately poses a risk of significant damage to OMRON, the domestic automobile

industry, and ultimately the US consumer as a increase in price. Like in the case of similar approvals for

vehicle components at the HTS level, OMRON views this product in the same manner. Immediate

movement of production to a US manufacturer or another country would pose significant re-tooling

costs, significant amounts of time, and approvals pertaining to consumer automobile safety standards are

costly and would take a significant amount of time to obtain.

OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. believes that CBP can easily exclude the AT SHIFTER

SWITCH in question based solely on the product description. The following are draft CBP exclusion

instructions:

"AT SHIFTER SWITCH rectangular base assembly with a "J" shaped switch housing molded to the top

running parallel to the base; circular connector at the center of the base and a rectangular connector on

the edge extendig at appx 45 degree angle from the face of the base "Metal, Plastic, Rubber, Other

Material & Material Compound;Switch to change the gear into transmission up and down; Used for AT

Shifter switch. (Right hand)Consist of 1) Plastic Handle, Shaft, Detent, sping and Plunger;2) sub assy

including PCB ASSY and Plastic Housing;3) One damper - made of rubber" "Handle dimensions:

87.8mm X53.5mm X24.9mm Housing dimensions : 55.33mm X44.29mm X28.5mm.

This information will be contained on the invoice from the supplier.

PUBLIC VERSION
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4859

Enerpac:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4848

Enerpac:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Organization Name:

Note: Representatives submitting on behalf of an organization must enter information below.

Requestor Representative:

Section 301 Investigation: China's Acts, Policies, and Practices Related to Technology 

Transfer, Intellectual Property, and Innovation - Form to Request Exclusion of Product

When submitting a product exclusion request using this form, enter the specified 

information in the following fields and explain the basis and rationale for your statements. 

By completing this form, you certify that the information provided is complete and 

correct to the best of your knowledge. 

1. Indicate whether the comment contains business confidential information (BCI), is a public

document, or is a public version of a BCI document.

3.

2. Please provide a complete and detailed description of the product of concern:

4.

5. Requestor's relationship to the product:

CONTINUED BELOW

*

10-digit HTSUS item number* for product you wish to address in this product exclusion request:

Use numerical characters only with no special characters (example: 1023456789). For help in finding 

the HTSUS item number associated with your product, see https://hts.usitc.gov/

1

7.

6. Does this submission in regulations.gov include additional attachments?

Please indicate whether any additional attachment contains business confidential

information (BCI), is a public document, or is a public version of a BCI document.

VERSION 1

Requestor Information

Requestor Name (Last, First):

Public Version of BCI

RC104, 11.2 ton Capacity, 4.13 in Stroke, General Purpose Hydraulic Cylinder; Maximum Operating 

Pressure psi: 10000; Weight Kgs: 3,3; Oil Capacity Advance cm3: 152; Stroke Ranges mm: 95 - 119

8412210075 Schmidt, Jackie Enerpac Jackie SchmidtImporter Yes Contains BCI
END 2

8. Is this product, or a comparable product, available from sources in the United States?:

VERSION 1

11. Please provide information in support your request, taking account of the instructions

provided in Section B of the Federal Register notice (note: text entered below can extend

beyond the apparent size of this box).

9. Is this product, or a comparable product, available from sources in third countries?:

10. Please provide the value and quantity (with units) of the Chinese-origin product of concern

that you purchased for each calendar year specified. Limit this figure to the products

purchased by your firm (or by members of your trade association) alone. Please provide 

estimates if precise figures are unavailable.

2016 Value:

2015 Value:

2017 Value:

2016 Quantity:

2015 Quantity:

2017 Quantity:

No No BCI BCI BCI BCI BCI BCI

See addendum for additional information.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 21
- 00115
- CR

Julian Ortega , Appellant

v. The State of Texas , Appellee

FROM THE 331ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D
- 1
- DC
- 21
- 200066 , THE HONORABLE CHANTAL ELDRIDGE , JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Julian Ortega , representing himself pro se, has filed a notice of “ direct appeal, ” in which he appear s to c hallenge an em ergency protective order signed by a ma gistrate on January 3, 2021 , following h is ar res t for ass ault

- fam ily violence

. 1 See Tex. C ode Crim. Proc.
art. 17.292

. The standards for determining whether an appellate court has jur i sdiction to hear

a nd determine a case “ is not whether the appeal is pre cluded by law, but whether the appeal is

aut h o rized b y law. ” Blanton v. State , 369 S.W.3d 894, 902 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012 ) ( quoting
Abbott v. State , 271 S.W.3d 694, 696

- 97 (Tex. Crim. A pp. 2008 ) ). In Texas , a ppeal s in c riminal

case s are pe rmitted only when they are specif ically authorized by sta tut e. State ex. rel. Lykos v.
Fin e , 330 S.W.3d 904, 915 (T ex. Crim. App. 2011) ; s ee Tex. C ode Crim. Proc. a rt. 44.02 ( “ A

1 By its terms , the em ergency protec tive order expired on Feb ru ary 5, 2021

. On March 2, 2021 , Ortega was charged by ind ic tment for the offense of assault family

- violence

. S ee Tex. Penal Code § 22.01(b) ( 2) (A)

. Th at charge currently re mains pending

.2

defendant in any crim inal action has the right of appeal under the rules hereinafter prescri bed

. . . . ” ) ; Tex. R. App. P. 26.2 ( notice of app ea l must be filed “ within 30 day s after day sentence is
im posed or suspend ed in op en court , o r after the day the trial court enter s an appealable order ” ).
Alt hough a defendant may appeal from a judgment of conviction for violation of a n e mergency prote c tive order , s ee e.g. , Smith v. State , No. 02

- 19

- 00 035

- CR, 2020 Tex . App. LE XIS 1066 ,
at * 1 (Tex. App.

— Fort Wo r th Feb. 6, 2020 , pet. ref ’ d ) (mem. op. not designated for publication ),

n o statute authorizes a n appeal from an emergency p rotecti ve order.

Con s e quen tly, w e l ack jurisdiction to consider this appeal , and the appeal is
d ismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 4 3.2(f)

.

________________________ __________________ Chari L . Kelly , Justice
Before Justices Goodwin, Tr iana, and Kell y Dismis sed for Want of Jurisdiction
Filed: May 7, 2021
Do Not Publish
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of General Growth Properties, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
John Bucksbaum, in my capacity as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
     or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

                                                  /s/ JOHN BUCKSBAUM
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                      John Bucksbaum
                                                 Chief Executive Officer

March 21, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 59 (Tuesday, March 28, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15910-15911]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7541]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. GT95-28-000]


K N Interstate Gas Transmission Co.; Notice of Refund Report

March 22, 1995.
    Take notice that on March 16, 1995, K N Interstate Gas Transmission 
Co. (KNI), filed a refund report in the referenced docket. KNI states 
that the refund report shows the Kansas ad valorem tax refund amounts 
refunded by first sellers and the allocation of those refund amounts to 
former jurisdictional sales customers. These amounts were paid on March 
13, 1995.
    KNI further states that copies of the filing were served upon 
former jurisdictional sales customers of K N Energy, Inc. and 
interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street NE., Washington, 
[[Page 15911]] DC 20426, in accordance with 18 CFR 385.214 and 385.211 
of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests 
should be filed on or before March 29, 1995. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the public reference room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-7541 Filed 3-27-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 96-60243

Summary Calendar

_____________________

LENARD G. GIBBS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

BOYD P. ATKINSON, Judge and Attorney

of Bolivar County, MS, ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 2:95-CV-66-B-B

_________________________________________________________________

August 21, 1996

Before GARWOOD, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Lenard G. Gibbs, Mississippi inmate #82242, appeals the

dismissal for frivolousness of his civil rights complaint. He

argues the following: 1) Boyd P. Atkinson rendered ineffective

assistance of counsel; 2) Atkinson violated Gibbs’s due process

rights; 3) Atkinson’s threats and the remaining defendants’
-2-

inaction violated Gibbs’s Eighth Amendment rights. We have

carefully reviewed the arguments and the appellate record. For

essentially the same reasons as explained in the magistrate judge’s

report, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its

discretion in dismissing the complaint as frivolous. See Denton v.

Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 33 (1992).

This appeal is frivolous and is therefore DISMISSED. See 5th

Cir. R. 42.2. We caution Gibbs that any additional frivolous

appeals filed by him will invite the imposition of sanctions. To

avoid sanctions, Gibbs is further cautioned to review all pending

appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are

frivolous because they have been previously decided by this court.

APPEAL DISMISSED. SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**TWEETER HOME ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC.CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tweeter Home Entertainment Group, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph G. McGuire, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer and acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to U.S.C. ss. 1350, asadopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.     /s/ Joseph G. McGuire     Joseph G. McGuire  President and Chief Executive Officer and
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 57 (Friday, March 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15582]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7279]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT


Public Information Collection Requirements Submitted to OMB for 
Review

    The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) submitted the 
following public information collection requirements to OMB for review 
and clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, Public Law 96-
511. Comments regarding these information collections should be 
addressed to the OMB reviewer listed at the end of the entry. Comments 
may also be addressed to, and copies of the submissions obtained from 
the Records Management Officer, Mary Ann Ball, (202) 736-4743, M/AS/
ISS, Room 930B, N.S., Washington, DC 20523.

Dated Submitted: March 8, 1995.
Submitting Agency: U.S. Agency for International Development.
OMB Number: OMB 0412-0011.
Form Number: USAID 1010-2
Type of Submission: Reinstatement.
Title: Application for Assistance- American Schools and Hospitals 
Aboard.
Purpose: USAID finances grant assistance to U.S. founders or sponsors 
who apply for grant assistance from ASHA on behalf of their 
institutions overseas. ASHA is a competitive grants program. The office 
of ASHA is charged with judging which applicants may be eligible for 
consideration and receive what amounts of funding for what purposes. To 
aid in such determination, the Office of ASHA has established 
guidelines as the basis for deciding upon the eligibility of the 
applicants and the resolution on animal grant awards. These guidelines 
are published in the Federal Register, Doc. 79-36221.
Annual Reporting Burden: Respondents: 85; average hrs per response: 12; 
annual burden hours: 1,020
Reviewer: Jeffrey Hill (202) 395-7340, Office of Management and Budget, 
Room 3201, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.

    Dated: March 5, 1995.
Genease E. Pettigrew,
Bureau of Management, Office of Administrative Service, Information 
Support Services Division.
[FR Doc. 95-7279 Filed 3-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6116-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          209455
<SECURITIES>                                    915938
<RECEIVABLES>                                   364859
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2190402
<PP&E>                                          714190
<DEPRECIATION>                                  330119
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2723551
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           419415
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           408
<OTHER-SE>                                     6942862
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2723551
<SALES>                                         631167
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                631167
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3152855
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (2519872)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (2519872)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (2519872)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (2519872)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.62)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.62)
        

</TABLE>