alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4917 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4917

  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide no-cost 
         coverage for PFAS testing under the Medicare program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 26, 2023

 Mr. Kildee (for himself, Mr. Fitzpatrick, Mr. Pascrell, and Ms. Mace) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
   Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and 
 Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
   each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide no-cost 
         coverage for PFAS testing under the Medicare program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Expanding Seniors' Access to PFAS 
Testing Act''.

SEC. 2. NO-COST COVERAGE FOR PFAS TESTING UNDER MEDICARE.

    (a) In General.--Section 1861 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395x) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (ww)(2)--
                    (A) by moving the margin of subparagraph (N) 2 ems 
                to the left;
                    (B) by redesignating subparagraph (O) as 
                subparagraph (P); and
                    (C) by inserting after subparagraph (N) the 
                following new subparagraph:
            ``(O) PFAS testing (as defined in subsection (nnn)).''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(nnn) PFAS Testing.--The term `PFAS testing' means a blood test 
ordered by a physician to determine the concentration of perfluoroalkyl 
and polyfluoroalkyl substances.''.
    (b) Application of No Cost-Sharing.--Section 1833(a)(1) of the 
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395l(a)(1)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (Y), by inserting ``(other than PFAS 
        testing (as defined in section 1861(nnn)) furnished on or after 
        January 1, 2024)'' after ``in the case of such services 
        described in subparagraph (A)'';
            (2) in subparagraph (GG), by striking ``and'' at the end; 
        and
            (3) by inserting ``, and (II) with respect to PFAS testing 
        (as defined in section 1861(nnn)) performed on or after January 
        1, 2024, the amounts paid shall be 100 percent of the lesser of 
        the actual charges for testing or the amount determined under 
        the fee schedule that applies to the screening and preventive 
        services described in section 1861(ww)(2)'' before the 
        semicolon at the end.
                                 <all>
```
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Nutrient Data Laboratory: Beltsville, MD
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Beltsville, Maryland (BHNRC) Beltsville Human Nutrition Research Center Nutrient Data Laboratory Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Research Projects Subjects of Investigation at this LocationEach ARS research project has related subjects of investigation.  Listed below are the subjects of investigation currently conducted at this location.
Clicking on a subject of investigation will list the research projects within that  subject of investigation.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2968

Price Pump Company:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2723

Price Pump Company:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.6

                       DIAGNOSTIC HEALTH SERVICES, INC.
                       2777 STEMMONS FREEWAY, SUITE 1525
                              DALLAS, TEXAS 75207


                                    January 1, 1998

Mr. Brad A. Hummel
4434 Gloster
Dallas, TX  75220

               RE:  EIGHTH AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
                    ----------------------------------------

Dear Brad:

          This will confirm that the Board of Directors of Diagnostic Health
Services, Inc. (the "Company") has authorized and approved certain amendments to
your outstanding employment agreement with the Company dated November 1, 1991
(as amended to date, the "Employment Agreement").

          The amendments that have been authorized and approved consist of the
following:

          3.  Paragraph 2 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended so as to
provide for (a) a new scheduled expiration date of December 31, 2002, and (b) an
automatic one-year extension of the then-scheduled expiration date at the close
of each calendar year, absent written notice to the contrary given by either you
or the Company not less than sixty (60) days prior to such calendar year-end.

          4.  Paragraph 3(a) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended so as
to provide for a minimum annual base salary of $310,500 per annum, effective
immediately.

          Except as specifically set forth herein, all terms and conditions of
the Employment Agreement shall remain unmodified and in full force and effect.

          If you are in agreement with the foregoing, kindly confirm same by
countersigning and returning to the Company a duplicate copy of this letter.

                                    Very truly yours,

                                    DIAGNOSTIC HEALTH SERVICES, INC.


                                    By:
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Max W. Batzer, Chairman

Acknowledged, Confirmed and
Agreed To:

---------------------------
Brad A. Hummel
Exhibit
23.1
  CONSENT
OF MALONEBAILEY, LLP
 INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 Ener1,
Inc.
 Fort
Lauderdale, Florida
 
 We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
Ener1, Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-148980, 333-112583 and 333-112581) and
S-3 (File No. 333-156609) of our report dated March 12, 2009 as updated on
January 19, 2010 with respect to the audited consolidated financial statements
of Ener1, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2008.
 
 MALONEBAILEY,
LLP
 www.malone-bailey.com
 Houston,
Texas
 
 March 11,
2010
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. FRANCISCO JAVIER RODRIGUEZ, AKA Javier LNU, Defendant - Appellant. No. 08-50313 D.C. No. 2:05-cr-00668-MMM-23
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Margaret M. Morrow, District Judge, Presiding Submitted November 3, 2009 ** Pasadena, California Before: T.G. NELSON, BYBEE and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges. Francisco Javier Rodriguez appeals the district court’s imposition of a 168- month sentence and $625,000 fine for violations of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 

# FILED
NOV 18 2009 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS841(b)(1)(A), and 846. This court ha s jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm. The district court’s determinati on that Rodriguez had not accepted responsibility, and therefore did not qualify for a three-level deduction in offense level, was not clearly erroneous becau se of Rodriguez’s intervening drugtrafficking conduct. See United States v. Cooper , 912 F.2d 344, 346 (9th Cir. 1990). Moreover, the total sentence imposed was reasonable under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) because the district court relied on multiple factors, including Rodriguez’s comparatively greater role in the drug conspiracy and the inability of the sentencing guidelines to capture the totality of Rodriguez’s drug-trafficking conduct. United States v. Saeteurn , 504 F.3d 1175, 1181 (9th Cir. 2007). The district court’s imposition of a $625,000 fi ne was reasonable given the financial information the district court had before it. United States v. Orlando , 553 F.3d 1235, 1239 (9th Cir. 2009). Finally, the government’s sentencing position was not plainly erroneous because the government’s obligations under the plea agreement were not triggered unless Rodriguez accepted responsibility. See United States v. Maldonado , 215 F.3d 1046, 1051 (9th Cir. 2000). AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 99.1

      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rimpac Resources Ltd. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas
M. Johnson, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ THOMAS M. JOHNSON
-----------------------------------
Thomas M. Johnson,
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
1 The Honorable Scott O. Wright, United St ates District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 06-1434

___________ Sid Brown, Jr., * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. John Page, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: June 27, 2007 Filed: July 9, 2007

___________ Before RILEY, MAGILL, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Sid Brown, Jr. (Brown), a Missouri in mate, appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to his medical needs while he was a pretrial detainee. After de novo review, seeBeck v. Skon , 253 F.3d 330, 332-33 (8th Cir. 2001) (standard of review), we conclude that the grant of summary j udgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown’s argument th at his appointed counsel below provided ineffective assistance is not a basis for reversal. See Glick v. Henderson , 855 F.2d-2- 536, 541 (8th Cir. 1988) (stating the remedy for ineffective assistance of appointed counsel in civil action is legal malpr actice suit). Thus, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. In addition, Brown’s pending motion for appointment of appellate counsel is denied.

______________________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           8,050
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,426
<ALLOWANCES>                                       661
<INVENTORY>                                      1,577
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,731
<PP&E>                                         133,778
<DEPRECIATION>                                  27,100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 165,884
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,621
<BONDS>                                        213,646
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,152
<PREFERRED>                                         88
<COMMON>                                            93
<OTHER-SE>                                    (77,535)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   165,884
<SALES>                                          3,592
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,667
<CGS>                                            1,397
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,120
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                48,203
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,584
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,491
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (68,441)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (68,441)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (70,746)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (7.61)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (7.61)


</TABLE>
IB 

Union Calendar No. 204 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4957 

[Report No. 118–254] 

To apply the requirements of the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998 

to a vacancy in the office of the Secretary of Labor, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 27, 2023 

Mr. KILEY (for himself and Ms. FOXX) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

OCTOBER 25, 2023 

Additional sponsor: Mrs. MILLER of Illinois 

OCTOBER 25, 2023 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 

House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed 

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 

[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on July 27, 2023] 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 4957 RH

A BILL 

To apply the requirements of the Federal Vacancies Reform 

Act of 1998 to a vacancy in the office of the Secretary 

of Labor, and for other purposes. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 4957 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Department of Labor 

5 Succession Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. APPLYING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE VACANCIES 

7 ACT TO VACANCY IN OFFICE OF SECRETARY 

8 OF LABOR. 

9 The first section of the Act of April 17, 1946 (60 Stat. 

10 91; 29 U.S.C. 552) is amended by striking the second and 

11 third sentences and inserting the following: ‘‘The Deputy 

12 Secretary is authorized to exercise the functions and per13 form the duties of the first assistant of the Secretary of 

14 Labor within the meaning of section 3345 of title 5, United 

15 States Code, and shall perform such other duties as may 

16 be required by law or prescribed by the Secretary of 

17 Labor.’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Union Calendar No. 204 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4957 

[Report No. 118–254] 

A BILL 

To apply the requirements of the Federal Vacancies 

the Secretary of Labor, and for other purposes. Reform Act of 1998 to a vacancy in the office of 

OCTOBER 25, 2023 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Comand ordered to be printed mittee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
EXHIBIT 32

      Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350,  Chapter 63 of Title 18,  United States Code),  each of the
undersigned  officers  of LMI  Aerospace,  Inc.,  a  Missouri  corporation  (the
"Company"), does hereby certify that, to the best of their knowledge:

The  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal  quarter ended March 31, 2004
(the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information  contained
in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 17, 2004                      /s/ Ronald S. Saks
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Ronald S. Saks
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 17, 2004                      /s/ Lawrence E. Dickinson
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Lawrence E. Dickinson
                                        Secretary and Chief Financial Officer

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to LMI Aerospace,  Inc. and will be retained by LMI Aerospace, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6299

ZACHARY WILLIAMS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus FREDERICK MENIFEE; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA00-3504-CCB) Submitted: September 20, 2001 Decided: October 15, 2001 Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Zachary Williams, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Mary Ann Rapp Ince, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* This case was placed in abeyance pending our decision in Atkinson v. Angelone , No. 00-6187, 2001 WL 1020287 (4th Cir. Sept. 6, 2001) (unpublished). 2 PER CURIAM: Zachary Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001), as untimely filed and denying his motions filed underFed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. * Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Williams v. Menifee, No. CA00-3504-CCB (D. Md. filed Feb. 1, 2001 & entered Feb. 2, 2001; filed Feb. 7, 2001 & entered Feb. 8, 2001; Feb. 14, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED