Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 53 / Monday, March 20, 1995 / Notices 14725

1Several other companies were identified in the

Order to Show Cause as possible being related to

d’Haens. Based on the response to the Order to

Show Cause, it has been determined that those

companies are no longer related to d’Haens.

should be directed to Pat Ellis on (301)

457–2095.

Dated: March 15, 1995.

Everett M. Ehrlich,

Under Secretary for Economic Affairs,

Economics and Statistics Administration.

[FR Doc. 95–6809 Filed 3–17–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–EA–M

Bureau of Export Administration

In the matter of Joseph P.M. D’Haens,

Respondent

[Docket No. 7102–01]

Related Person Order

Whereas, on April 25, 1988, thenUnder Secretary for Export Enforcement

Paul Freedenberg entered an order

affirming a March 25, 1988

Recommended Decision and Order

entered against Respondent Joseph P.M.

d’Haens (d’Haens) by the

Administrative Law (ALJ), which, in

pertinent part, provided that:

For a period of 20 years * * * Respondent,

Joseph P.M. d’Haens, Amerikalei 96, 2000

Antwerp, Belgium, and all successors,

assignees, officers, partners, representatives,

agents, and employees are hereby denied all

privileges of participating, directly or

indirectly, in any manner of [sic] capacity, in

any transaction involving commodities or

technical data exported from the United

States * * *.

* * * * *

After notice and opportunity for comment,

such denial of export privileges may be made

applicable to any person, firm, corporation,

or business organization with which the

Respondent is now or hereafter may be

related by affiliation, ownership, control,

position of responsibility, or other

connection in the conduct of export trade or

related services.

Whereas, on May 28, 1993, the ALJ

issued an Order to, inter alia,1 Discom

NV, Endymion NV, and Kronatech NV

directing them to show cause why the

sanctions in the April 25, 1988 Order

entered against d’Haens should not be

made applicable to them because of

their relationship to d’Haens in the

conduct of export trade or related

services;

Whereas, on December 25, 1993,

d’Haens responded to the Order to

Show Cause by admitting that he has a

business relationship with Discom NV,

Endymion NV, and Kronatech NV;

Whereas, the ALJ has recommended,

based on the evidence of record, that I

enter an Order finding that the above

persons are related to d’Haens by

affiliation, ownership, control, position

of responsibility, or other connection in

the conduct of export trade or related

services;

Whereas, I find, based on the

evidence of record, that each of the

above persons is related to d’Haens by

affiliation, ownership, control, position

of responsibility, or other connection in

the conduct of export trade or related

services;

It is therefore ordered: That paragraph

III of the ALJ’s Recommended Decision

and Order of March 25, 1988, as

affirmed by the Under Secretary’s April

25, 1988 Order, entered against Joseph

P.M. d’Haens, be amended by adding

the following as persons related to

d’Haens:

Discom NV, Liersesteenweg 96, 2520

Ranst, Belgium

and

Endymion NV, Liersesteenweg 98, 2520

Ranst, Belgium

and

Kronatech NV, Amerikalei 96, 2000

Antwerpen, Belgium

Each of the above persons is therefore

subject to the same sanctions as are

imposed against d’Haens by the April

25, 1988 Order, which continues in full

force and effect.

This Order is effective immediately. A

copy of this Order shall be served on

each named related person and

published in the Federal Register.

This constitutes the final agency

action in this matter.

Dated: March 13, 1995.

William A. Reinsch,

Under Secretary for Export Administration.

[FR Doc. 95–6720 Filed 3–17–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DT–M

International Trade Administration

[A–570–838]

Notice of Preliminary Determination of

Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Honey

From the People’s Republic of China

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 20, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Karla Whalen or David J. Goldberger,

Office of Antidumping Investigations,

Import Administration, International

Trade Administration, U.S. Department

of Commerce, 14th Street and

Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–6309 or

(202) 482–4136, respectively.

Preliminary Determination

We preliminarily determine that

honey from the People’s Republic of

China (PRC) is being, or is likely to be,

sold in the United States at less than fair

value (LTFV), as provided in section

733 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as

amended (the Act). The estimated

margins are shown in the ‘‘Suspension

of Liquidation’’ section of this notice.

Case History

Since the initiation of this

investigation on October 24, 1994, (59

FR 54434, October 31, 1994), the

following events have occurred:

On November 1, 1994, we sent a

survey to the PRC’s Ministry of Foreign

Trade and Economic Cooperation

(MOFREC) and the China Chamber of

Commerce for Foodstuffs, Native

Produce and Animal By-products

Importers and Exporters (the Chamber)

requesting the identification of

producers and exporters, and

information on production and sales of

honey exported to the United States.

A response to the survey was received

on November 29, 1994. Based on this

information, the Department sent full

questionnaires including Attachment I

(dealing with claims for Market

Oriented Industry (MOI) status) and

Attachment II (dealing with claims for

Separate Rates), to MOFTEC and the

Chamber, requesting that the

questionnaire be transmitted to all

companies that process honey for export

to the United States and to all

companies that were engaged in

exporting honey to the United States

during the period of investigation (POI).

On December 13 1994, MOFTEC

responded that it had done so.

On November 17, 1994, the U.S.

International Trade Commission (ITC)

notified the Department of Commerce

(the Department) of its preliminary

determination that there is a reasonable

indication that an industry in the

United States is materially injured or

threatened with material injury by

reason of imports of honey from the PRC

that are allege to be sold at less than fair

value.

On January 3, 1995, the Department

received section A responses from the

Chamber and 28 Chinese exporters and

their respective producers.

Supplemental information was received

on January 5 and 23, 1995. Each

exporter is listed with its supplier(s):

Kunshan Xinlong Food, Ltd.

Kunshan Xinlong

Jiangsu Native Produce Import and Export

Jiangsu Sweet and Qinghai Provincial Bee

Products

Jiangxi Native Produce Import and Export

Jianxi Ao Shan Duo Qi Beverage Factory