alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:

(1) Registration Statement
Number 33-60730 on Form S-8 filed March 31, 1993,

(2) Registration Statement Number 333-27459 on Form S-8 filed
May 20, 1997,

(3) Registration Statement Number 333-67033 on Form S-8 filed November 10, 1998,

(4) Registration Statement Number 333-87996 on Form S-8 filed May 10, 2002,

(5) Registration Statement Number 333-105081 on Form S-8 filed May 8, 2003,

(6) Registration Statement Number 333-129636 on Form S-3 filed November 10, 2005,

(7) Registration Statement Number 333-129632 on Form S-8 filed November 10, 2005,

(8) Registration Statement Number 333-138302 on Form S-3 filed October 30, 2006,

(9) Registration Statement Number 333-140400 on Form S-3 filed February 2, 2007,

(10) Registration Statement Number 333-158801 on Form S-3 filed April 27, 2009, and

(11) Registration Statement Number 333-160598 on Form S-8 filed July 16, 2009,

of our report dated February 24, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements, financial statement schedule and the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting which appears in this Form 10-K.



|                   |  |                               
|------------------ |  | ------------------------------
|                   |  | /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
|                   | 
|New York, New York |  |                               
|February 24, 2010  |  |
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00489-CR

PATRICK LAMONT JOHNSON APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 3 OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

A jury convicted Appellant Patrick Lamont Johnson of the state jail felony 

offense of burglary of a building and assessed his punishment at two years’ 

confinement. The trial court sentenced him accordingly.

Johnson’s court-appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to 

withdraw as counsel and a brief in support of that motion. Counsel’s brief and 

motion meet the requirements of Anders v. California by presenting a 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable 

grounds for relief. 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). We gave Johnson an 

opportunity to file a pro se brief, which he did. The State declined the opportunity

to file a brief in response.

Prior to filing his pro se brief in response to his appointed counsel’s Anders

brief, this court had already denied Johnson’s two previous motions requesting 

substitution of counsel. Now, despite this court’s having granted a time 

extension to file his brief and Johnson’s having filed his pro se brief, he has filed 

a third motion to this court requesting substitution of appellate counsel. As with 

his previous two motions, Johnson cites no authority to show that he is entitled to 

the assistance of a different appointed attorney. See Malcom v. State, 628 

S.W.2d 790, 791 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1982) (discussing defendant’s 

burden regarding entitlement to change of counsel).

Once an appellant’s court-appointed attorney files a motion to withdraw on 

the ground that the appeal is frivolous and fulfills the requirements of Anders, this 

court is obligated to undertake an independent examination of the record. See 

Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Mays v. State, 

904 S.W.2d 920, 922–23 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1995, no pet.). Only then may 

we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82–

83, 109 S. Ct. 346, 351 (1988).

We have carefully reviewed the record, counsel’s brief, and Johnson’s 

brief. We agree with counsel that this appeal is wholly frivolous and without 
3

merit; we find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. See 

Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see also 

Meza v. State, 206 S.W.3d 684, 685 n.6 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Furthermore, 

we have reviewed Johnson’s third motion requesting substitution of counsel and 

find nothing in the motion that causes us to retreat from our previous two orders 

denying this request.

Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, deny Johnson’s third 

motion for substitution of counsel, and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

BILL MEIER

JUSTICE

PANEL: WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: October 25, 2012
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 56 (Thursday, March 23, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15304]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7168]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Minerals Management Service


Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Policy Committee of the Minerals 
Management Advisory Board; Notice and Agenda for Meeting

AGENCY: Minerals Management Service, Interior.

SUMMARY: The OCS Policy Committee of the Minerals Management Advisory 
Board will meet at the Houstonian Hotel in Houston, Texas on May 3-4, 
1995.
    The agenda will cover the following principal subjects:

--Regional Stakeholders Task Force Presentation
--Government Role in Low Oil Price/Marginal Development Scenario: 
United Kingdom
--Subcommittee on the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 Presentation
--Point-Counter Point: Imports, Is A High Rate A National Security 
Risk?
--Scientific Committee Update

    The meeting is open to the public. Upon request, interested parties 
may make oral or written presentations to the OCS Policy Committee. 
Such requests should be made no later than April 14, 1995, to the 
Office of Advisory Board Support, Minerals Management Service, 381 
Elden Street, MS-4110, Herndon, Virginia, 22070, Attention: Terry 
Holman.
    Requests to make oral statements should be accompanied by a summary 
of the statement to be made. For more information, call Terry Holman at 
(703) 787-1211.
    Minutes of the OCS Policy Committee meeting will be available for 
public inspection and copying at the Minerals Management Service in 
Herndon, Virginia.

DATES: Wednesday, May 3 and Thursday, May 4, 1995.

ADDRESSES: The Houstonian Hotel, 111 North Post Oak Lane, Houston, 
Texas 77024--(713) 680-2626.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Terry Holman at the address and phone 
number listed above.

    Authority: Federal Advisory Committee Act, P.L. No. 92-463, 5 
U.S.C. Appendix 1, and the Office of Management and Budget's 
Circular No. A-63, Revised.

    Dated: March 15, 1995.
Thomas Gernhofer,
Associate Director for Offshore Minerals Management.
[FR Doc. 95-7168 Filed 3-22-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MR-M
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-12-0000697 20-AUG-2013 09:26 AM
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                    In connection with theAnnual Report of GlobalIndustries, Ltd. ("Global") on Form10-K for the quarter and year endingDecember 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") onMarch 16, 2005 (the "Report"), theundersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 1350 asadopted pursuant to §§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge basedupon a review of the Report, that:

(1)              The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2)              The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of Global as of thedates and for periods presented as required by such Report.

/S/ WILLIAM J. DORE'

William J. Dore'

Chief Executive Officer

March 16,  2006

This certification is provided pursuant to §§ 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Global or the certifying officerfor purposes of §§ 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by§§ 906 has been provided to Global and will be retained by it and furnished tothe SEC or its staff upon request.
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                               JARDEN CORPORATION
                       SUBSIDIARIES OF JARDEN CORPORATION

     The following are subsidiaries of Jarden Corporation as of December 31,
2004 and the jurisdictions in which they are organized. The names of certain
subsidiaries have been omitted because in the aggregate they do not constitute a
significant subsidiary as determined by the Company.

    Company                                  State of Incorporation/Organization
    -------                                  -----------------------------------
    Alltrista Limited                                      Canada

    Alltrista Newco Corporation                            Indiana

    Alltrista Plastics Corporation*                        Indiana

    Bernardin, Limited                                     Canada

    Bicycle Holding, Inc.                                 Delaware

    Canadian Playing Card Company, Ltd.                    Canada

    Desarrollo Industrial Fitec                            Mexico

    Hearthmark, LLC **                                    Delaware

    International Playing Card Company, Ltd.               Canada

    Jarden Acquisition I, Inc.                            Delaware

    Jarden Zinc Products, Inc.                             Indiana

    Loew-Cornell, Inc.                                   New Jersey

    Lehigh Consumer Products   Corporation              Pennsylvania

    Naipes Hernaclio Fournier, S.A.                        Spain

    Quoin, LLC                                            Delaware

    Tilia Direct, Inc.                                    Delaware

    Tilia International, Inc.                             Delaware

    Tilia, Inc.                                           Delaware

    Unimark Plastics Limited                           United Kingdom

    The United States Playing Card Company                Delaware

    USPC Holding, Inc.                                    Delaware

*   (DBA) Jarden Plastic Solutions
**  (DBA) Jarden Home Brands
```
**Exhibit 32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION**
 
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Industrial Enterprises of America, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (the "Form 10-QSB") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-QSB.
 
 
 
 Dated:  December 31 2004
 
 _/s/ Crawford Shaw______________
 Crawford Shaw, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board and President
 
 
 
 
 The foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 491 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to adjust the rate of per diem 

payments provided by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to grantees 

that provide services to homeless veterans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 24, 2023 

Ms. WILLIAMS of Georgia (for herself, Ms. TENNEY, Ms. JACOBS, and Mr. 

GARBARINO) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to adjust the rate 

of per diem payments provided by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to grantees that provide services to homeless veterans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Return Home to Hous5 ing Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 491 IH

1 SEC. 2. ADJUSTMENTS TO RATE OF PER DIEM PAYMENTS 

2 PROVIDED BY THE SECRETARY OF VETERANS 

3 AFFAIRS FOR SERVICES FURNISHED TO 

4 HOMELESS VETERANS. 

5 Section 2012(a)(2)(B) of title 38, United States 

6 Code, is amended— 

7 (1) in clause (i)— 

8 (A) in subclause (I), by inserting ‘‘, includ9 ing in response to an emergency’’ after ‘‘appro10 priate’’; and 

11 (B) in subclause (II)(aa)(BB), by striking 

12 ‘‘115’’ and inserting ‘‘200’’; and 

13 (2) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘150’’ and insert14 ing ‘‘200’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### THOMAS B. WOODY v. HUBERT H. BARNETT.

(Filed 18 April, 1956.)

*Judgments*§ 32—

Tire judgment rolls in previous proceedings to iiave a segment of abandoned highway declared a neighborhood public road *held*not to support a plea of *res judicata*in plaintiff’s action against the owner of land abutting the other side of the abandoned highway to have the plaintiff declared owner in fee and entitled to possession of that half of the abandoned road lying on his side of the center line. G.S. 136-67.

. Appeal by defendant from *Sink, J.,*at October Civil Term 1955, of PERSON.

Civil action to declare plaintiff “invested with the easement of right of way in and to” a certain abandoned segment of road along his property line, known as Payne’s Tavern Road, and that he be declared the owner thereof as provided by G.S. 136-67.

Defendant, answering, sets up and pleads as *res judicata*judgments in previous actions and proceeding relating to a portion of the same segment of abandoned road, and his counsel upon argument on appeal to this Court declared orally that “plaintiff bases his whole defense on *res judicata*

Upon the trial in Superior Court plaintiff offered evidence tending to show that he owns land lying on the west side of Payne’s Tavern Road, the road in question, and that the description in his deed calls for, and runs with the center line of said segment; that defendant owns land lying on the east side of a portion of said segment; that plaintiff and defendant claim title from a common source; that plaintiff and other interested parties sought in court actions and proceeding to establish the said segment as a neighborhood public road within the meaning of G.S. 136-67; and failing in that, he brings this action to recover the fee in one-half of the abandoned road along his property line.

Defendant offered in evidence the judgment rolls in the previous actions and proceeding instituted by plaintiff and others as above stated, and oral testimony on which he bases his plea of *res judicata.*

Motions of defendant, aptly made, for judgment as of nonsuit were denied. And the case was submitted to the jury upon a single issue as to whether plaintiff is the owner in fee and entitled to possession of the abandoned part of Payne’s Tavern Road lying on the west side of the center line as alleged in the complaint, specifically described. The jury answered the issue “Yes.” And to judgment in accordance therewith in favor of plaintiff, defendant excepted and appeals to Supreme Court, and assigns error.

*783
      *R. P. Reade, Redmond B. Dawes, Thomas B. Woody, Jr., and E. C. Bryson for Plaintiff Appellee.*

*Davis & Davis for Defendant Appellant.*

Per Curiam.

Upon a careful review and consideration of the judgment rolls in the previous actions and proceeding pertaining to the abandoned segment of road here involved, in the light of well established applicable principles of law, there is no sufficient evidence to support a plea of *res judicata.*And the case was properly submitted to the jury on the single issue. The assignments of error presented fail to show error for which the judgment should be disturbed.

No error.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 57 (Friday, March 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15558]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7246]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.; Notice of Filing

[Docket Nos. CP94-369-004 and CP95-33-001]
March 20, 1995.
    Take notice that on March 3, 1995, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company 
(Tennessee) tendered for filing to be included in its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Original Volume No. 2, the following tariff sheets to be effective 
March 3, 1995:

Tenth Revised Sheet No. 4
First Revised Sheet No. 5235
First Revised Sheet No. 5248
First Revised Sheet No. 5581

    Tennessee states that the purpose of these tariff sheets is to 
cancel Rate Schedules X-16, X-27, and X-66 pursuant to Commission 
Orders.
    Tennessee states that copies of the filing are available for 
inspection at its principal place of business in the Tenneco Building, 
Houston, Texas, and have been mailed to all affected parties.
    Any persons desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rule 211 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211). All such 
protests should be filed before March 27, 1995. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-7246 Filed 3-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 50 (Wednesday, March 15, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 14000]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6329]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Meeting of the National Advisory Board on Medical Rehabilitation 
Research

    Pursuant to Pub. L. 92-463, notice is hereby given of the meeting 
of the National Advisory Board on Medical Rehabilitation Research, 
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, April 6-7, 
1995, Radisson Plaza Lord Hotel, 20 West Baltimore Street, Baltimore, 
Maryland 21201.
    The meeting will be open to the public from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. 
on April 6 and 9:00 a.m. to adjournment on April 7. Attendance by the 
public will be limited to space available. Board topic will include: 
(1) A report on fiscal issues concerning the National Center for 
Medical Rehabilitiation Research (Center) and the Institute; (2) 
reports on program activities of the Center; (3) a discussion of 
general priority areas of research for the Center; (4) reports by the 
National Science Foundation and the Department of Veterans Affairs; and 
(5) a discussion of support for medical rehabilitiation research by 
government agencies.
    Ms. Mary Plummer, Committee Management Specialist, NICHD, 6100 
Building, Room 5E03, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 
20892, Area Code 301, 496-1485, will provide a summary of the meeting 
and a roster of Advisory Board members as well as substantive program 
information. Individuals who plan to attend and need special 
assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, should contact Ms. Plummer.

    Dated: March 8, 1995.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 95-6329 Filed 3-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
    
    The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended September 27,
2009 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Jack H. BrownJack H. BrownChairman of the Board, President,
and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)  /s/ Phillip J. SmithPhillip J. SmithExecutive Vice President, and
and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                       OF
                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                       AND
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I, Martin E. Franklin, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Jarden Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2004
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Annual Report on
Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Jarden Corporation.

/s/ Martin E. Franklin
----------------------
Martin E. Franklin
Chief Executive Officer
March 2, 2005

      I, Ian G.H. Ashken, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Jarden Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2004
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Annual Report on
Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Jarden Corporation.

/s/ Ian G.H. Ashken
-------------------
Ian G.H. Ashken
Chief Financial Officer
March 2, 2005
```
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3020

CPS Products, Inc:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_05.09.19.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel