alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 45 (Wednesday, March 8, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 12789]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5609]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Regulatory Guide; Issuance, Availability

    The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a new guide in its 
Regulatory Guide Series. This series has been developed to describe and 
make available to the public such information as methods acceptable to 
the NRC staff for implementing specific parts of the Commission's 
regulations, techniques used by the staff in evaluating specific 
problems or postulated accidents, and data needed by the staff in its 
review of applications for permits and licenses.
    Regulatory Guide 6.9, ``Establishing Quality Assurance Programs for 
the Manufacture and Distribution of Sealed Sources and Devices 
Containing Byproduct Material,'' provides guidance acceptable to the 
NRC staff on the essential elements needed to develop, establish, and 
maintain a quality assurance program for the manufacture and 
distribution of sealed sources and devices.
    Comments and suggestions in connection with items for inclusion in 
guides currently being developed or improvements in all published 
guides are encouraged at any time. Written comments may be submitted to 
the Rules Review and Directives Branch, Division of Freedom of 
Information and Publications Services, Office of Administration, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555.
    Regulatory guides are available for inspection at the Commission's 
Public Document Room, 2120 L Street NW., Washington, DC. Copies of 
issued guides may be purchased from the Government Printing Office at 
the current GPO price. Information on current GPO prices may be 
obtained by contacting the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government 
Printing Office, Post Office Box 37082, Washington, DC 20013-7082, 
telephone (202) 512-2249. Issued guides may also be purchased from the 
National Technical Information Service on a standing order basis. 
Details on this service may be obtained by writing NTIS, 5285 Port 
Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161.

(5 U.S.C. 552(a))

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 13th day of February 1995.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Eric S. Beckjord,
Director, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research.
[FR Doc. 95-5609 Filed 3-7-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 11364 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

DANIEL VELA, JR. , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:12

- CR

- 37

- 1

Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Daniel Vela, Jr., has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Vela h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 6, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-11364 Document: 00514586510 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/06/2018No. 17

- 11364

2 appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRAN TED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 17-11364 Document: 00514586510 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/06/2018
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4916 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4916

To amend the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 to repeal restrictions on 
                        onshore wind and solar.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 26, 2023

 Ms. Kamlager-Dove (for herself, Mr. Grijalva, Ms. Lee of California, 
    Ms. Clarke of New York, Ms. Norton, Mr. Scott of Virginia, Ms. 
McCollum, Mr. Cleaver, Mr. Carbajal, Ms. Lee of Pennsylvania, Mr. Ivey, 
Mr. Bowman, Mr. Beyer, Ms. Castor of Florida, Ms. Velazquez, Ms. Tlaib, 
Mr. Trone, Mr. Pallone, Ms. Titus, Ms. Ocasio-Cortez, Mrs. Foushee, Mr. 
Espaillat, Mr. Mullin, and Mr. Huffman) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 to repeal restrictions on 
                        onshore wind and solar.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Comprehensive Legislation for 
Expanding and Advancing Nonrestrictive Energy Act'' or the ``CLEAN 
Energy Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF ONSHORE WIND AND SOLAR LEASING RESTRICTIONS.

    Paragraph (1) of section 50265(b) of Public Law 117-169 (43 U.S.C. 
3006(b)) is repealed.
                                 <all>
```
Organization Name:

Note: Representatives submitting on behalf of an organization must enter information below.

Requestor Representative:

Section 301 Investigation: China's Acts, Policies, and Practices Related to Technology 

Transfer, Intellectual Property, and Innovation - Form to Request Exclusion of Product

When submitting a product exclusion request using this form, enter the specified 

information in the following fields and explain the basis and rationale for your statements. 

By completing this form, you certify that the information provided is complete and 

correct to the best of your knowledge. 

1. Indicate whether the comment contains business confidential information (BCI), is a public

document, or is a public version of a BCI document.

3.

2. Please provide a complete and detailed description of the product of concern:

4.

5. Requestor's relationship to the product:

CONTINUED BELOW

*

10-digit HTSUS item number* for product you wish to address in this product exclusion request:

Use numerical characters only with no special characters (example: 1023456789). For help in finding 

the HTSUS item number associated with your product, see https://hts.usitc.gov/

1

7.

6. Does this submission in regulations.gov include additional attachments?

Please indicate whether any additional attachment contains business confidential

information (BCI), is a public document, or is a public version of a BCI document.

VERSION 1

Requestor Information

Requestor Name (Last, First):

Public Version of BCI

RC252, 25.8 ton Capacity, 2.00 in Stroke, General Purpose Hydraulic Cylinder; Maximum Operating 

Pressure psi: 10000; Weight Kgs: 6,4; Oil Capacity Advance cm3: 166; Stroke Ranges mm: 48 - 94

8412210075 Schmidt, Jackie Enerpac Jackie SchmidtImporter Yes Contains BCI
END 2

8. Is this product, or a comparable product, available from sources in the United States?:

VERSION 1

11. Please provide information in support your request, taking account of the instructions

provided in Section B of the Federal Register notice (note: text entered below can extend

beyond the apparent size of this box).

9. Is this product, or a comparable product, available from sources in third countries?:

10. Please provide the value and quantity (with units) of the Chinese-origin product of concern

that you purchased for each calendar year specified. Limit this figure to the products

purchased by your firm (or by members of your trade association) alone. Please provide 

estimates if precise figures are unavailable.

2016 Value:

2015 Value:

2017 Value:

2016 Quantity:

2015 Quantity:

2017 Quantity:

No No BCI BCI BCI BCI BCI BCI

See addendum for additional information.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7060

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CARROL SCOTT TRIBBLE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Anderson. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (CR-95-834, CA-97-1380-8-13)

Submitted: May 28, 1998 Decided: June 9, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher Lance Sheek, WELCH & ASSOCIATES, Greenwood, South

Carolina, for Appellant. Harold Watson Gowdy, III, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Carrol Scott Tribble seeks to appeal the district court's

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994

& Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. United States v. Tribble, Nos. CR-95-834,

CA-97-1380-8-13 (D.S.C. July 15, 1997). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4235

Tianhai Electric North America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
#### SOUTHERN PRINTERS SUPPLY COMPANY v. R. S. PRESCOTT, M. B. PRESCOTT, and H. W. RENFREW.

(Filed *7*October, 1931.)

Bills and Notes O d — Endorser before delivery to payee is liable to holder in due course although payee has sbld security and failed to apply proceeds to payment of note.

Where the payee of a note secured by a chattel mortgage transfers the note for value before maturity by endorsement to another, the endorsee is a holder in due course and may recover on the note although the payee *457has sold the property mortgage and has failed to apply the proceeds to the payment of the note, the holder in due course not being affected by the subsequent change in the relationship of the parties, and an endorser before delivery to the payee may not claim that as to him the note was discharged.

Appeal by M. B. Prescott from *Devin,*Jat March Term, 1931, of Pitt.

No error.

PL W. Benfrew sold B. S. Prescott certain printing machinery and equipment at an agreed price, payable in installments of $500 each evidenced by notes secured by a chattel mortgage on the machinery. The note sued on is one of this series. It was signed by B. S. Prescott, endorsed by M. B. Prescott before delivery to the payee (Benfrew), and afterwards endorsed and delivered by the payee to the plaintiff for value before maturity. Neither the maker nor the endorser paid the note when due, and Benfrew sold the property under his mortgage. He did not pay the proceeds or any part thereof to the plaintiff. The verdict was as follows:

1. Are the defendants indebted to the plaintiff on the note sued on, and if so, in what amount? Answer: Yes, $500 and interest from 8 April, 1929.

2. Are the defendants, B. S. Prescott and M. B. Prescott primarily liable on the note sued on and set out in the complaint? Answer: No.

3. Is the defendant, B. S. Prescott, indebted to the defendant, H. W. Benfrew, on the account set out in defendant Benfrew’s answer? Answer : Yes, $400.

Judgment for plaintiff; appeal by defendant M. B. Prescott.

*Albion Dunn for appellant.*

*F.*(?. *J ames & Son for appellee.*

Pee CueiaM.

It is contended that Benfrew’s failure to pay the note in controversy out of the proceeds arising from the foreclosure of his chattel mortgage releases the appellant from liability. The plaintiff became a holder in due course and was not deprived of his legal rights by virtue of any change in the subsequent relation of the defendants. We have examined the several exceptions and find

No error.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4688

Apergy ESP Systems, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**In connection with the Annual Report of General GrowthProperties, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-K for theperiod ending December 31, 2005, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, John Bucksbaum, in my capacity asChief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities    Exchange Act of 1934; and           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Company.     /s/ John Bucksbaum           John Bucksbaum *Chief Executive Officer*March 31, 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5101 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5101

To increase the reference prices for certain commodities, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 1, 2023

 Mr. Davis of North Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
                referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To increase the reference prices for certain commodities, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Agricultural Commodities Price 
Enhancement Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCE PRICE INCREASES FOR WHEAT, CORN, SOYBEANS, PEANUTS, 
              AND SEED COTTON.

    Section 1111(19) is amended of the Agricultural Act of 2014 (7 
U.S.C. 9011(19)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``$5.50 per bushel'' 
        and inserting ``$6.05 per bushel'';
            (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``$3.70 per bushel'' 
        and inserting ``$4.63 per bushel'';
            (3) in subparagraph (H), by striking ``$8.40 per bushel'' 
        and inserting ``$9.66 per bushel'';
            (4) in subparagraph (J), by striking ``$535.00 per ton'' 
        and inserting ``$588.50 per ton''; and
            (5) in subparagraph (O), by striking ``$0.367 per pound'' 
        and inserting ``$0.45 per pound''.
                                 <all>
```
1 The Honorable Jerry W. Cavaneau, United States Magistrate Judge for the

Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 99-2994

___________ Michael L. Haynes, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, * Social Security Administration, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: October 5, 2000 Filed: October 12, 2000

___________ Before BEAM, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Michael L. Haynes appeals the district court’s 1 grant of summary judgment in favor of the Commissioner of Social Security, upholding the Commissioner’s cessation of Haynes’s disability insurance benefits based on a finding that alcoholism was a contributing factor material to his disability. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs, we conclude substantial evidence supported the Commissioner’s-2-

decision. See 42 U.S.C. § 423(d)(2)(C) (“An individual shall not be considered to be disabled for purposes of this subchapter if alcoholism or drug addiction would . . . be a contributing factor material to the Commissioner’s determination that the individual is disabled.”); Pettit v. Apfel , 218 F.3d 901, 903 (8th Cir. 2000) (claimant has initial burden of showing that alcoholism or drug addiction is not material to finding of disability); Rehder

v. Apfel , 205 F.3d 1056, 1059 (8th Cir. 2000) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
EXHIBIT 32.2

            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                         RULE 13a-14(b) OR 15d-14(b) AND
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jurak Corporation World
Wide, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for quarter ended November 30, 2004,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the date hereof, I,
Anthony C. Jurak, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify for the
purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act') and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code, that:

         (1)      the Company's Quarterly Report fully complies with the
                  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                  Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly
                  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
                  and results of operations of the Company.

Date: January 18, 2004                          /s/ Anthony C. Jurak
                                                -------------------------------
                                                Anthony C. Jurak
                                                Chief Financial Officer








         The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of
the Form 10-QSB or as separate disclosure documents. A signed original of this
written statement has been provided to Jurak Corporation World Wide, Inc. and
will be retained by Jurak Corporation World Wide, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.






                                       13