alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 13, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4766

Duravant LLC and FMH Conveyors Americas:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests and the 

request failed to show that this particular product is available only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
Organization Name:

Note: Representatives submitting on behalf of an organization must enter information below.

Requestor Representative:

Section 301 Investigation: China's Acts, Policies, and Practices Related to Technology 

Transfer, Intellectual Property, and Innovation - Form to Request Exclusion of Product

When submitting a product exclusion request using this form, enter the specified 

information in the following fields and explain the basis and rationale for your statements. 

By completing this form, you certify that the information provided is complete and 

correct to the best of your knowledge. 

1. Indicate whether the comment contains business confidential information (BCI), is a public

document, or is a public version of a BCI document.

3.

2. Please provide a complete and detailed description of the product of concern:

4.

5. Requestor's relationship to the product:

CONTINUED BELOW

*

10-digit HTSUS item number* for product you wish to address in this product exclusion request:

Use numerical characters only with no special characters (example: 1023456789). For help in finding 

the HTSUS item number associated with your product, see https://hts.usitc.gov/

1

7.

6. Does this submission in regulations.gov include additional attachments?

Please indicate whether any additional attachment contains business confidential

information (BCI), is a public document, or is a public version of a BCI document.

VERSION 1

Requestor Information

Requestor Name (Last, First):

Public Version of BCI

A1029BULK, REEL/SPOOL JACK ASSEMBLY

8431100090 Schmidt, Jackie Enerpac Jackie SchmidtImporter Yes Contains BCI
END 2

8. Is this product, or a comparable product, available from sources in the United States?:

VERSION 1

11. Please provide information in support your request, taking account of the instructions

provided in Section B of the Federal Register notice (note: text entered below can extend

beyond the apparent size of this box).

9. Is this product, or a comparable product, available from sources in third countries?:

10. Please provide the value and quantity (with units) of the Chinese-origin product of concern

that you purchased for each calendar year specified. Limit this figure to the products

purchased by your firm (or by members of your trade association) alone. Please provide 

estimates if precise figures are unavailable.

2016 Value:

2015 Value:

2017 Value:

2016 Quantity:

2015 Quantity:

2017 Quantity:

No No BCI BCI BCI BCI BCI BCI

See addendum for additional information.
C

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

FILED

AUG 2 5 2020

DA 19-0316

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

FRANKLIN JOHN BECKER,

Defendant and Appellant.

Clerk

ORDER

Counsel for Appellant Franklin John Becker filed a motion and brief asking to be

allowed to withdraw from this appeal on grounds that counsel has been unable to find any

nonfrivolous issues to raise on appeal, pursuant to § 46-8-103(2), MCA, and Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). This Court granted Becker time to

respond, but no response was filed.

The Court has now independently examined the record pursuant to § 46-8-103(2),

MCA, and Anders. We conclude no arguments with potential legal merit can be raised in

Becker's appeal in this case.

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED.

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to all counsel of record and to

Becker personally.

DATED this —day of August, 2020.

Chief Justice

08/25/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0316
.z 2-1-4,__

e.

Justices
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

     Section 11(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities
Act"), provides that if part of a registration statement at the time it becomes
effective contains an untrue statement of a material fact, or omits a material
fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein
not misleading, any person acquiring a security pursuant to such registration
statement (unless it is proved that at the time of such acquisition such person
knew of such untruth or omission) may assert a claim against, among others, an
accountant who has consented to be named as having certified any part of the
registration statement or as having prepared any report for use in connection
with the registration statement.

     On June 25, 2002, the trust announced the termination of its engagement of
Arthur Andersen LLP as its independent auditors upon the trustee's appointment
of KPMG LLP to serve as the trust's independent auditors for fiscal 2002. For
more information, see the trust's current report on Form 8-K dated June 25, 2002
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 28, 2002.

     After reasonable efforts, the trust has been unable to obtain the consent
of Arthur Andersen, the trust's former independent auditors, as to the
incorporation by reference of their report for the years ended December 31, 2001
and 2000 into the trust's and XTO Energy Inc.'s previously filed registration
statement (No. 333-56983) and XTO Energy Inc.'s previously filed registration
statements (Nos. 33-55784 and 333-91460) under the Securities Act, and the trust
has not filed that consent with this Annual Report on Form 10-K in reliance on
Rule 437a of the Securities Act of 1933. Because the trust has not been able to
obtain Arthur Andersen's consent, you will not be able to recover against Arthur
Andersen under Section 11 of the Securities Act for any untrue statements of a
material fact contained in our financial statements audited by Arthur Andersen
or any omissions to state a material fact required to be stated therein.
EXHIBIT
32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Apria
Healthcare Group Inc. (the company or Apria) on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the SEC on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Lawrence M. Higby, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ LAWRENCE M. HIGBY Lawrence M. Higby
Chief Executive OfficerMarch 15, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to Apria and will be retained by Apria and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3999

II-VI Incorporated:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

“Made in China 2025” or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
#### In the Matter of Dodson H., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Harvey Sklaver, J.), entered July 25, 1989, which, after finding that appellant had committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted fourth degree criminal possession of a weapon, and the act of unlawful possession of a weapon by a person under 16 years of age, conditionally discharged him, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

*311The fact-finding court correctly determined that the prosecutor’s delay in disclosing the *Rosario*material did not substantially prejudice appellant’s right to a fair hearing *(People v Rosario,*9 NY2d 286, *cert denied*368 US 866; *see, People v Martinez,*71 NY2d 937, 940; *People v Ranghelle,*69 NY2d 56, 63). Moreover, the arresting ofiicer’s testimony sufficiently established appellant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Concur—Ross, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin and Wallach, JJ.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk November 23, 2009

p1116 

# Order

November 23, 2009

139470-1

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139470-1 COA: 290230 & 290231 Macomb CC: 2007-003927-FH; 2007-004856-FH ROBERT WRIGHT, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the June 23, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 31.2
                     RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION

I, John F. Foley, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Salisbury Bancorp,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      a)    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
            disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
            supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
            registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
            to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
            period in which this report is being prepared;

      c)    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
            and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
            the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of
            the end of the period covered by this report based on such
            evaluation; and

      c)    disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
            control over financial reporting that occurred during the
            registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
            affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
            registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

      a)    all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or
            operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
            reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
            record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

      b)    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
            other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
            internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 14, 2004


By: /s/ John F. Foley
    -----------------------
    Chief Financial Officer


                                       21
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Certification
      of Periodic Report**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**


**As
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002**





Pursuant
      to, and for purposes only of, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned hereby certifies
      that (i) the Quarterly Report of Peoples Bancorp, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the
      quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) information contained
      in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of Peoples Bancorp, Inc. and
      Subsidiaries.


Date:
                  May 13, 2008
              /s/
                  Thomas G. StevensonThomas
                  G. StevensonPresident/Chief
                  Executive Officer&
                  Chief Financial Officer
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 26, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-5229

Bergstrom, Inc: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September_2019.pdf. 

An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the exclusion notice. The scope of the exclusion is governed by the scope of the 10-digit HTSUS 

subheadings and product descriptions in the annex to the product exclusion notice, and not by the 

product descriptions set out in any particular request for exclusion. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
Q Lotus Holdings, Inc.


 


500 N Dearborn St.  Suite 605, Chicago, IL  60654







May 20, 2011


 


Southshore Real Estate Development, LLC


Four Executive Boulevard – Suite 200


Suffern, NY  10901


Attention: Josh Goldstein








Re:  2nd Amendment to Promissory Note









Dear Josh:







In accordance with our discussions, Q Lotus Holdings, Inc. and Southshore Real Estate Development, LLC hereby agree to further amend the Promissory Note dated February 23, 2011 between Q Lotus Holdings, Inc. and Southshore Real Estate Development, LLC in the amount of two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000) such that, notwithstanding anything contained in the Promissory Note to the contrary:








	
  

	
1.

	
Q Lotus Holdings, Inc. (“Obligor’) hereby promises to pay to the order of Southshore Real Estate Development, LLC (“Payee’) the principal sum of Three Hundred Thousand Dollars ($300,000); and













	
  

	
2.

	
The Maturity Date is hereby extended to June 30, 2011.












Please acknowledge your acceptance of the above change by executing this amendment below.







Q Lotus Holdings, Inc.








	
By:

	
/S/ GARY ROSENBERG

	  
	  	
Gary Rosenberg

	  
	
Its:

	
CEO

	  










Understood and Agreed to this 20th day of May, 2011.







Southshore Real Estate Development, LLC








	
By:

	
/S/ JOSH GOLDSTEIN

	  
	  	
Josh Goldstein

	  
	
Its:

	
General Partner
Exhibit 32.1


                        Certification of CEO Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of GAMCO Investors, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Mario J.
Gabelli, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Mario J. Gabelli
--------------------
Name:   Mario J. Gabelli
Title:  Chief Executive Officer
Date:   April 13, 2007

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby  consent to the  incorporation  by reference  to (a) the  Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-1040),  as amended,  and the Prospectus contained
therein, (b) the Registration  Statement on Form S-3 (033-55792-NY),as  amended,
and the Prospectus contained therein, and (c) the Registration Statement on Form
S-8 (333-01048), as amended, and the Prospectus contained therein, of our report
dated September23,  1999, appearing on Page 19 of Greg Manning Auctions,  Inc.'s
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the years ended June 30, 1999 and 1998.


/s/ AMPER, POLITZINER & MATTIA P.A.

Edison, New Jersey
September 28, 1999

                                       47
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED May 6, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-60165 Summary Calendar

NOUHAD RACHED EL HAJJAOUI, Petitioner,

versus JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.

-------------------- Petition For Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA NO. A29-184-563

-------------------- Before JONES, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Nouhad Rached El Hajjaoui (“Hajjaoui”) filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for writ of habeas corpus in district court challenging his detention without bond while the Immigration and Naturalization Service conducted removal proceedings. In his petition he asserted, inter alia , a claim that he was a national of the United States. The district court denied Hajjaoui’sNo. 03-60165 -2- habeas corpus petition and transferred Hajjaoui’s nationality claim to this court. 28 U.S.C. § 1631 permits a transfer if this court would have been able to exercise jurisdiction on the date that the case was filed in the district court, the district court lacked jurisdiction over the case, and the transfer is in the interest of justice. Hajjaoui filed his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition in the district court prior to the date that the immigration judge issued the removal order and he did not appeal the removal order to the Board of Immigration Appeals. Therefore, this court could not have exercised jurisdiction over the petition on the date that Hajjaoui filed the petition in district court. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1) (petition for review must be filed not later than 30 days after the date of the final order of removal); 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1) (a court may review a final order of removal only if the alien has exhausted all administrative remedies as of right); Emejulu v. INS , 989 F.2d 771, 771 (5th Cir. 1993) (noting that this court would not assume original jurisdiction over habeas corpus claim). DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.