alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BRIGHT HORIZONS FAMILY SOLUTIONS, INC. FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                      22,236,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               16,986,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (846,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            48,348,000
<PP&E>                                      43,679,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (10,376,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             100,579,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       32,102,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       121,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  60,963,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               100,579,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            58,461,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               50,087,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,356,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              34,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,229,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,324,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,905,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,905,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.15
        

</TABLE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-4524

CW Bearing USA, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 13, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2285

Signode Industrial Group LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Killbuck Bancshares, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Luther E. Proper, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Luther E. Proper   
|    |  | Luther E. Proper       
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer
|    |  | May 7, 2008            

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Killbuck Bancshares,
Inc. and will be retained by Killbuck Bancshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
FedFirst Financial Corporation 10-Q


EXHIBIT 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of FedFirst Financial Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Patrick G. O’Brien, the President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:
August 16, 2010

/s/ Patrick G. O’BrienPatrick G. O’BrienPresident and Chief Executive Officer
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

November 5, 2001

Before

Hon. RICHARD D. CUDAHY, Circuit Judge

Hon. FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge

Hon. ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge

FIRST HEALTH GROUP CORP., formerly known

as Healthcare Compare Corp., doing

business as The First Health

AFFORDABLE Medical Networks,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

No. 00-3833 v.

BCE EMERGIS CORPORATION, formerly known

as United Payors & United Providers,

Inc., doing business as UP&UP,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United

States District Court

for the Northern

District of Illinois,

Eastern Division.

No. 96 C 2518

James B. Moran, Judge.

Order

The opinion of this court issued on October 16, 2001, is

amended as follows:

Page 2, line 5, delete “or ‘silent PPO’”;

Page 8, six lines from the bottom, delete “silent or”;

Page 9, line 4, replace “silent” with “non-directed”;
No. 00-3833 Page 2

Page 9, line 10, replace “silent” with “non-directed”;

Page 9, line 14, replace “silent” with “other”;

Page 9, line 19, replace “silent” with “non-directed”;

Page 9, second line from the bottom, replace “silent” with

“non-directed”;

Page 10, line 10, replace “silent” with “non-directed”; and

Page 10, line 12, replace “silent” with “non-directed”.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4. 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________

No. 96-40594

____________

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE

COMPANY,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

HOWARD L HAWKINS, et al.,

Defendants,

GERALD WHITEHEAD; ROSE WHITEHEAD; STARLETTE

WHITEHEAD,

Intervenor DefendantsAppellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

(6:95-CV-448)

February 17, 1997

Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DEMOSS, Circuit

Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

We agree with the district court’s determination that the

injuries sustained by the Whiteheads did not result from an

automobile accident so as to trigger coverage under the Hawkinses’
-2-

automobile insurance policy. See Misle v. State Farm Mut. Auto.

Ins. Co., 908 S.W.2d 289, 291 (Tex. App. 1995, no writ); Southern

Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co. v. Brock, 659 S.W.2d 165, 166-67 (Tex.

App. 1983, writ ref’d n.r.e.). We therefore AFFIRM the district

court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of State Farm Mutual

Automobile Insurance Company.
BRANDON AVERY DOUGLAS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-3591

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 1, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

Mark W. Moseley, Judge.

Brandon Avery Douglas, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Angela R. Hensel, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, WETHERELL, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit 11.01

<TABLE>

                                      ALBANK FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
                                                      Form 10-K

                                 Statement regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings

<CAPTION>
                                                                            Year ended             Year ended
                                                                     December 31, 1996      December 31, 1995
<S>                                                                  <C>   		    <C>

1.  Net income                                                            $ 26,207,145             29,283,191

2.  Weighted average common shares outstanding<F1>                          13,335,015             14,329,642

3.  Weighted average common stock equivalents due 
    to the dilutive effect of stock options when utilizing 
    the treasury stock method.  Per share market price is based 
    on the average per share market price for the period.<F1>                  924,070                782,642
4.  Total weighted average common shares and 
    common stock equivalents outstanding for primary
    earnings per share computation<F1>                                      14,259,085             15,112,284

5.  Primary earnings per share<F1>                                        $       1.84                   1.94

6.  Weighted average common shares outstanding<F1>                          13,335,015             14,329,642

7.  Weighted average common stock equivalents due 
    to the dilutive effect of  stock options when utilizing 
    the treasury stock method.  Per share market price used 
    is the greater of  the average market price for the period 
    or the end-of-period market price per share.<F1>                           987,151                831,960

8.  Total weighted average common shares and 
    dilutive shares outstanding for fully diluted
    earnings per share computation<F1>                                      14,322,166             15,161,602

9.  Fully diluted earnings per share<F1>                                  $       1.83                   1.93


<FN>
<F1> Adjusted to reflect the 6-for-5 stock dividend paid on April 1, 1996.  

</TABLE>
#### Wendell Wayne WRIGHT, Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 68381.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Jan. 2, 1996.

Rosalynn Koch, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for Appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Joanne E. Beal, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for Respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and CRANDALL and KAROHL, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals denial of Rule 24.035 relief from plea of guilty and sentence on charge of burglary second degree. The motion court found the alleged basis for relief was refuted by the facts in the record of the plea proceeding. The finding is not clearly erroneous as required by Rule 24.035(j). We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of TechLite, Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report"), I,
J.D. Arvidson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to my
knowledge:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.  78m or  78o(d)); and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  August  19,  2003

                                    /s/  J.D.  Arvidson
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    J.D.  Arvidson
                                    Chairman  and  Chief  Executive  Officer


     The  above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350) and is not being filed as part of
the  Form  10-QSB  or  as  a  separate  disclosure  document.










                                                                      Exhibit 32
---

EXHIBIT 31.1RULE 13A-14(A)/15D-14(A)
CERTIFICATION

I, Leo Shi Young, certify that:

(1) I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Solar
Enertech Corp. (the Registrant).

(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report.

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

(4) The Registrants other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act), Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and

(5) The Registrants other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.

|Date: May 18, 2007 | By:
      /s/ Leo Shi Young                    
|------------------ | -----------------------------------------------
|                   |                                                
|                   | Leo Shi Young                                  
|                   | President and CEO - Principal Executive Officer



---
1The Honorable Jerry W. Cavaneau, United States Magistrate Judge for the

Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by

consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 99-2994

___________

Michael L. Haynes, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Arkansas.

Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, *

Social Security Administration, * [UNPUBLISHED]

* 

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: October 5, 2000

 Filed: October 12, 2000

___________

Before BEAM, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Michael L. Haynes appeals the district court’s1 grant of summary judgment in

favor of the Commissioner of Social Security, upholding the Commissioner’s cessation

of Haynes’s disability insurance benefits based on a finding that alcoholism was a

contributing factor material to his disability. Having carefully reviewed the record and

the parties’ briefs, we conclude substantial evidence supported the Commissioner’s
-2-

decision. See 42 U.S.C. § 423(d)(2)(C) (“An individual shall not be considered to be

disabled for purposes of this subchapter if alcoholism or drug addiction would . . . be

a contributing factor material to the Commissioner’s determination that the individual

is disabled.”); Pettit v. Apfel, 218 F.3d 901, 903 (8th Cir. 2000) (claimant has initial

burden of showing that alcoholism or drug addiction is not material to finding of

disability); Rehder v. Apfel, 205 F.3d 1056, 1059 (8th Cir. 2000) (standard of review).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 53 (Monday, March 20, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 14775]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6740]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[OR-130-1220-00; GP5-082]


Notice of Public Lands Closure/Restrictions, Grant County, 
Washington

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Wenatchee Resource Area, Spokane 
District.

ACTION: Emergency closure of public lands; Washington.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Closure and restriction order. Under the authority identified 
in 43 CFR 8364.1 (a.) Fifty acres of public lands located on Saddle 
Mountains, (S\1/2\NE\1/4\NW\1/4\, N\1/2\NW\1/4\NE\1/4\, SW\1/4\NW\1/
4\NE\1/4\, Section 12, T. 15 N., R. 23 E. Willamette Meridian), are 
closed to surface disturbing activities including OHV riding and 
digging of petrified wood. The existing road and jeep trail are not 
affected by this closure. This closure/restriction is effective 
immediately upon publication of this notice and will remain in effect 
year round or until rescinded. This order is necessary to provide 
protection for sensitive plant species habitat. Authorized BLM 
personnel conducting habitat restoration activities, and personnel 
operating fire fighting and/or emergency vehicles or operations 
including search and rescue activities, are exempt from this order.
    Any person who fails to comply with a closure or restriction order 
issued under this subpart may be subject to the penalties provided in 
43 CFR 8360.0-7. These penalties are as follows. Violations are 
punishable by a fine not to exceed $1,000 and/or imprisonment not to 
exceed 12 months.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James Fisher, Area Manager, BLM, Wenatchee Resource Area Office, 915 N. 
Walla Walla Street, Wenatchee, Washington, 98801-1521; 509-665-2100.

    Dated February 28, 1995.
James F. Fisher,
Wenatchee Resource Area Manager.
[FR Doc. 95-6740 Filed 3-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-M
| Name                                                     | Jurisdiction              of Incorporation |
|----------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
| Boca                Global, Inc.                         | Florida                                    |
| Boca                Research International, Inc.         | United                States Virgin Island |
| Boca                Research Holland B.V.                | Holland                                    |
| Boca                Research (UK) Limited                | United                Kingdom              |
| Boca                Research International Holding, Ltd. | Mauritius                                  |
| AppsComm,                Inc.                            | Florida                                    |
| EnerNow                Technologies, Inc.                | Florida                                    |
| Ener                EL Holdings, Inc.**                  | Florida                                    |
| Ener1                Technologies, Inc.                  | Florida                                    |
| Ener1                Battery Company                     | Florida                                    |
| EnerFuel,                Inc.                            | Florida                                    |
| NanoEner,                Inc.                            | Florida                                    |
| EnerDel,                Inc.*                            | Delaware                                   |
| Ener1                Ukraine                             | Ukraine                                    |
| Boca                Research of Delaware, Inc.           | Delaware                                   |