14240 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 51 / Thursday, March 16, 1995 / Proposed Rules

area is effective during the specific days and

times established in advance by a Notice to

Airmen. The effective days and times will

thereafter be continuously published in the

Airport/Facility Directory.

* * * * *

Paragraph 6002 Class E Airspace Areas

Designated as a Surface Area for an Airport.

* * * * *

ASO GA E2 Marietta, GA [New]

Cobb County-McCollum Field, GA

(Lat. 34°00′47′′ N, long. 84°35′55′′ W)

Dobbins ARB (NAS Atlanta)

(Lat. 35°54′55′′ N, long. 84°30′59′′ W)

Within a 4-mile radius of Cobb CountyMcCollum Field, excluding that airspace

southeast of a line connecting the 2 points of

intersection with a 5.5-mile radius centered

on Dobbins ARB (NAS Atlanta). This Class E

airspace area is effective during the specific

days and times established in advance by a

Notice to Airmen. The effective days and

times will thereafter be continuously

published in the Airport/Facility Directory.

* * * * *

ASO GA E2 Marietta, GA [Revised]

Dobbins ARB (NAS Atlanta), GA

(Lat. 33°54′55′′ N, long. 84°30′59′′ W)

Cobb County-McCollum Field

(Lat. 34°00′47′′ N, long. 84°35′55′′ W)

Fulton County Airport-Brown Field

(Lat. 33°46′45′′ N, long. 84°31′17′′ W)

Within a 5.5-mile radius of Dobbins ARB

(NAS Atlanta), excluding that airspace

northwest of a line connecting the 2 points

of intersection with a 4-mile radius centered

on Cobb County-McCollum Field, and also

excluding that airspace south of a line

connecting the 2 points of intersection with

a 4-mile radius centered on Fulton County

Airport-Brown Field. This Class E airspace

area is effective during the specific days and

times established in advance by a Notice to

Airmen. The effective days and times will

thereafter be continuously published in the

Airport/Facility Director.

* * * * *

Paragraph 6004 Class E Airspace Areas

Designated as an Extension to a Class D

Surface Area.

* * * * *

ASO GA E4 Atlanta Dobbins AFB, GA

[Removed]

* * * * *

Issued in College Park, Georgia, on March

6, 1995.

Michael J. Powderly,

Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division,

Southern Region.

[FR Doc. 95–6514 Filed 3–15–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 95–ANM–8]

Proposed Amendment to Class D

Airspace; Ogden, Utah

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

SUMMARY: This proposed rule would

amend the Ogden, Utah, Class D

airspace, based on the results of an

airspace review. This proposal would

amend the ceiling altitude and the

geographic size of the Ogden, Utah,

Class D airspace area. The amendment

would bring publications up-to-date

giving continuous information to the

aviation public.

DATES: Comments must be received on

or before April 15, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on the

proposal in triplicate to: Manager,

System Management Branch, ANM–530,

Federal Aviation Administration,

Docket No. 95–ANM–8, 1601 Lind

Avenue S.W., Renton, Washington

98055–4056.

The official docket may be examined

at the same address.

An informal docket may also be

examined during normal business hours

at the address listed above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

James Riley, System Management

Branch, ANM–530, Federal Aviation

Administration, Docket No. 95–ANM–8,

1601 Lind Avenue S.W., Renton,

Washington 98055–4056; telephone

number: (206) 227–2537.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

Interested parties are invited to

participate in this proposed rulemaking

by submitting such written data, views,

or arguments as they may desire.

Comments that provide the factual basis

supporting the views and suggestions

presented are particularly helpful in

developing reasoned regulatory

decisions on the proposal. Comments

are specifically invited on the overall

regulatory, aeronautical, economic,

environmental, and energy-related

aspects of the proposal.

Communications should identify the

airspace docket number and be

submitted in triplicate to the address

listed above. Commenters wishing the

FAA to acknowledge receipt of their

comments on this notice must submit

with those comments a self-addressed,

stamped postcard on which the

following statement is made:

‘‘Comments to Airspace Docket No. 95–

ANM–8.’’ The postcard will be date/

time stamped and returned to the

commenter. All communications

received on or before the specified

closing date for comments will be

considered before taking action on the

proposed rule. The proposal contained

in this notice may be changed in light

of comments received. All comments

submitted will be available for

examination at the address listed above

both before and after the closing date for

comments. A report summarizing each

substantive public contact with FAA

personnel concerned with this

rulemaking will be filed in the docket.

Availability of NPRM’s

Any person may obtain a copy of this

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM)

by submitting a request to the Federal

Aviation Administration, System

Management Branch, ANM–530, 1601

Lind Avenue S.W., Renton, Washington

98055–4056. Communications must

identify the notice number of this

NPRM. Persons interested in being

placed on a mailing list for future

NPRM’s should also request a copy of

Advisory Circular No. 11–2A, which

describes the application procedure.

The Proposal

The FAA is considering an

amendment to part 71 of the Federal

Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 71) to

amend Class D airspace at Ogden, Utah.

This proposal would amend the ceiling

altitude and the geographic size of the

Ogden, Utah, Class D airspace area. The

coordinates for this airspace docket are

based on North American Datum 83.

Class D airspace is published in

Paragraph 5000 of FAA Order 7400.9B

dated July 18, 1994, and effective

September 16, 1994, which is

incorporated by reference in 14 CFR

71.1. The Class D airspace designation

listed in this document would be

published subsequently in the Order.

The FAA has determined that this

proposed regulation only involves an

established body of technical

regulations for which frequent and

routine amendments are necessary to

keep them operationally current. It,

therefore, (1) is not a ‘‘significant

regulatory action’’ under Executive

Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant

rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies

and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February

26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant

preparation of a regulatory evaluation as

the anticipated impact is so minimal.

Since this is a routine matter that will

only affect air traffic procedures and air

navigation, it is certified that this rule,

when promulgated, will not have a

significant economic impact on a

substantial number of small entities
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 51 / Thursday, March 16, 1995 / Proposed Rules 14241

under the criteria of the Regulatory

Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

Airspace, Incorporation by reference,

Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

In consideration of the foregoing, the

Federal Aviation Administration

proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as

follows:

PART 71—[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for 14 CFR

part 71 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. app. 1348(a), 1354(a),

1510; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–

1963 Comp., 389; 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 14 CFR

11.69.

§ 71.1 [Amended]

2. The incorporation by reference in

14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation

Administration Order 7400.9B, Airspace

Designations and Reporting Points,

dated July 18, 1994, and effective

September 16, 1994, is amended as

follows:

Paragraph 5000 Class D Airspace

* * * * *

ANM UT D Ogden-Hinckley Airport, UT

[Revised]

Ogden-Hickley Airport, UT

(Lat. 41°11′46′′ N, long. 112°00′44′′ W)

Ogden, Hill AFB, UT

(Lat. 41°07′25′′ N, long. 111°58′23′′ W)

That airspace extending upward from the

surface up to, but not including, 7,800 feet

MSL within a 4.3-mile radius of the OgdenHinkley Airport, excluding the portion south

of a line beginning east of the airport at the

intersection of the 4.3-mile radius of the

Ogden-Hinckley Airport and the 4.3-mile

radius of the Hill AFB, extending west to the

intersection of the 4.3-mile radius of the

Ogden-Hinckley and the 4.3-mile radius of

the Hill AFB. This Class D airspace area is

effective during the specific dates and times

established in advance by a Notice to

Airmen. The effective date and time will

thereafter be published in the Airport/

Facility Directory.

* * * * *

Issued in Seattle, Washington, on March 6,

1995.

Richard E. Prang,

Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division,

Northwest Mountain Region

[FR Doc. 95–6513 Filed 3–15–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric

Administration

15 CFR Part 944

Restricting or Prohibiting Attracting

Sharks by Chum or Other Means in the

Monterey Bay National Marine

Sanctuary; Public Hearing

AGENCY: Sanctuaries and Reserves

Division (SRD), Office of Ocean and

Coastal Resource Management (OCRM),

National Ocean Service (NOS), National

Oceanic and Atmospheric

Administration (NOAA), Department of

Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public hearing.

SUMMARY: The National Oceanic and

Atmospheric’s Sanctuaries and Reserves

Division (SRD) is considering amending

the regulations for the Monterey Bay

National Marine Sanctuary (MBNMS or

Sanctuary) to restrict or prohibit the

attracting of sharks by the use of chum

or other means in the MBNMS. An

advance notice of proposed rulemaking

published February 28, 1995 (60 FR

10812) discussed the reasons SRD is

considering restricting or prohibiting

this activity in the MBNMS. A 30-day

comment period closes on March 30,

1995. A public hearing has been

scheduled to assist in maximizing

public comment on this issue.

Individuals wishing to make a statement

will be required to sign up at the door

and will be limited to three minutes.

DATES: The hearing will be held on

Wednesday, March 22, 1995, starting at

7:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The hearing will be held at

the Cabrillo College, 500 Building,

Room 507, 6500 Soquel Drive, Aptos,

California, 95003.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Aaron King at (408) 647–4257 or

Elizabeth Moore at (301) 713–3141.

(Federal Domestic Assistance Catalog

Number 11.429, Marine Sanctuary Program)

Dated: March 13, 1995.

W. Stanley Wilson,

Assistant Administrator for Ocean Services

and Coastal Zone Management.

[FR Doc. 95–6642 Filed 3–15–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–08–M

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD

20 CFR Part 335

RIN: 3220–AB11

Sickness Benefits

AGENCY: Railroad Retirement Board.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: The Railroad Retirement

Board (Board) hereby proposes to

amend its regulations under the

Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act

(RUIA) to permit a ‘‘physician assistantcertified’’ to execute a statement of

sickness in support of payments of

sickness benefits under the RUIA. The

proposed rule would also eliminate

certain obsolete language.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on

or before April 17, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Secretary to the Board,

Railroad Retirement Board, 844 Rush

Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Thomas W. Sadler, Assistant General

Counsel, Railroad Retirement Board,

844 Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611,

(312) 751–4513, TDD (312) 751–4701,

TDD (FTS (312) 386–4701).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section

335.2(a)(2) provides that in order to be

entitled to sickness benefits under the

RUIA, a claimant must provide a

‘‘statement of sickness’’. Section

335.3(a) of the Board’s regulations lists

the individuals from whom the Board

will accept a statement of sickness. That

list does not currently include physician

assistants. In many parts of the country,

physician assistants are more accessible

(and their services less expensive) than

licensed medical doctors (MD’s). Under

present regulations, the Board will not

accept a statement of sickness or

supplemental statement of sickness

from a physician assistant unless there

is some followup verification that the

physician assistant completed the

statement under the supervision of an

MD. This is administratively costly and

in many cases unnecessarily delays

payment of sickness benefits. Thus, the

Board proposes to add ‘‘physician

assistant-certified’’ to its list of

individuals from whom it will accept a

statement of sickness.

The Board also proposes to amend

section 335.4(d)(5) of its regulations by

deleting the first sentence of paragraph

(d)(5), which relates to the filing of a

statement of sickness by a female

employee whose claim for sickness

benefits is based upon pregnancy,

miscarriage or childbirth. The special

form required by paragraph (d)(5) is no

longer used, since, for purposes of filing

for sickness benefits, a distinction is no

longer made between pregnancy,

miscarriage or childbirth and other

illnesses.

The Board has determined that this is

not a major rule for purposes of

Executive Order 12866. Therefore, no

regulatory analysis is required. The