alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PRIME MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                     COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
               FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000, 1999, 1998, 1997 and 1996


<TABLE>
<S>                                             <C>              <C>          <C>           <C>               <C>

                                                                       Years Ended December 31,
                                                 2000            1999           1998            1997           1996
                                              ------------    ------------   ------------    ------------   ------------


Income before income taxes
     and after minority interests                 $17,383         $24,471        $18,171         $20,651        $10,957

Undistributed equity income                          (274)           (583)          (102)           (408)             -

Minority interest income of subsidiaries
     with fixed charges                            11,684           3,726          1,823           6,074          7,000
                                              ------------    ------------   ------------    ------------   ------------

Adjusted earnings                                  28,793          27,614         19,892          26,317         17,957
                                              ------------    ------------   ------------    ------------   ------------

Interest on debt                                   10,563           9,408          8,469           7,477          5,977

Debt issuance costs                                   173             566          4,978             360          2,735
                                              ------------    ------------   ------------    ------------   ------------

Total fixed charges                                10,736           9,974         13,447           7,837          8,712
                                              ------------    ------------   ------------    ------------   ------------

Total available earnings
     before fixed charges                         $39,529         $37,588        $33,339         $34,154        $26,669
                                              ============    ============   ============    ============   ============

Ratio                                                 3.7             3.8            2.5             4.4            3.1
                                              ============    ============   ============    ============   ============

</TABLE>
H. R. 4955 

One Hundred Eighteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-four 

An Act 

To name the community-based outpatient clinic of the Department of Veterans 

Affairs in Monroeville, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Henry Parham VA Clinic’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. FINDINGS. 

Congress finds the following: 

(1) Henry Parham was born in Emporia, Virginia, in 

November 1921. 

(2) At age 21, Henry Parham was drafted into the Army 

and shipped out to England in 1943 with the 320th Barrage 

Balloon Battalion in preparation for the D-Day invasions. 

(3) The 320th Barrage Balloon Battalion, a segregated 

Army unit, consisted of approximately 700 African-American 

soldiers with the mission of hoisting barrage balloons designed 

to entangle incoming German planes and prevent them from 

conducting strafing runs on ground troops. 

(4) On June 6, 1944, Private First Class Henry Parham 

and his section of the 320th Barrage Balloon Battalion landed 

at Omaha Beach. With the threat of enemy sniper and rifle 

fire ever present, PFC Parham’s unit performed their duties, 

hoisting their barrage balloons 2,000 feet into the air over 

the beachhead in Normandy. 

(5) For two months, Private First Class Henry Parham 

and the 320th Barrage Balloon Battalion stood watch at Omaha 

Beach, keeping the pipeline of incoming supplies and Allied 

troops secure before returning to the United States in September 1944. 

(6) After his service, Henry Parham moved to Wilkinsburg, 

Pennsylvania, where he lived and worked as a heavy equipment 

operator until 1986. There, he met and married his wife, Ethel 

Parham, to whom he was married for more than 45 years. 

(7) Henry Parham died on July 4, 2021, in Pittsburgh, 

Pennsylvania, at the age of 99. He was survived by his wife, 

Ethel, both of whom served for decades as volunteers at the 

medical center of the Department of Veterans Affairs in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and local chapters of veterans service 

organizations. 

(8) Henry Parham was the last surviving African-American 

combat veteran who took part in the D-Day landings on June 

6, 1944. 
H. R. 4955—2 

SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF HENRY PARHAM DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 

AFFAIRS CLINIC. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The community-based outpatient clinic of 

the Department of Veterans Affairs in Monroeville, Pennsylvania, 

shall after the date of the enactment of this Act be known and 

designated as the ‘‘Henry Parham Department of Veterans Affairs 

Clinic’’ or the ‘‘Henry Parham VA Clinic’’. 

(b) REFERENCE.—Any reference in any law, regulation, map, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the community-based outpatient clinic referred to in subsection (a) shall be 

considered to be a reference to the Henry Parham VA Clinic. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Exhibit 31.1

 

I, Edward J. Sisk, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by this report of Merrill Lynch Municipal ABS, Inc. Prerefunded Municipal Certificates, Series 2 and Series 3;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;

 

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and

 

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the compliance by the trustee and the depositor with the minimum servicing or similar standards based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or            similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas.

 

| By:   | /s/ Edward J. Sisk   |
|-----------------|--------------------------------|

Name: Edward J. Sisk

| Title:   | Assistant Vice President |
|--------------------|--------------------------|

 

Date: March 19, 2009

 

----
Organization Name:

Note: Representatives submitting on behalf of an organization must enter information below.

Requestor Representative:

Section 301 Investigation: China's Acts, Policies, and Practices Related to Technology 

Transfer, Intellectual Property, and Innovation - Form to Request Exclusion of Product

When submitting a product exclusion request using this form, enter the specified 

information in the following fields and explain the basis and rationale for your statements. 

By completing this form, you certify that the information provided is complete and 

correct to the best of your knowledge. 

1. Indicate whether the comment contains business confidential information (BCI), is a public

document, or is a public version of a BCI document.

3.

2. Please provide a complete and detailed description of the product of concern:

4.

5. Requestor's relationship to the product:

CONTINUED BELOW

*

10-digit HTSUS item number* for product you wish to address in this product exclusion request:

Use numerical characters only with no special characters (example: 1023456789). For help in finding 

the HTSUS item number associated with your product, see https://hts.usitc.gov/

1

7.

6. Does this submission in regulations.gov include additional attachments?

Please indicate whether any additional attachment contains business confidential

information (BCI), is a public document, or is a public version of a BCI document.

VERSION 1

Requestor Information

Requestor Name (Last, First):

Public Version of BCI

RC756, 79.5 ton Capacity, 6.13 in Stroke, General Purpose Hydraulic Cylinder; Maximum Operating 

Pressure psi: 10000; Weight Kgs: 29,5; Oil Capacity Advance cm3: 1601; Stroke Ranges mm: 120 - 

174

8412210075 Schmidt, Jackie Enerpac Jackie SchmidtImporter Yes Contains BCI
END 2

8. Is this product, or a comparable product, available from sources in the United States?:

VERSION 1

11. Please provide information in support your request, taking account of the instructions

provided in Section B of the Federal Register notice (note: text entered below can extend

beyond the apparent size of this box).

9. Is this product, or a comparable product, available from sources in third countries?:

10. Please provide the value and quantity (with units) of the Chinese-origin product of concern

that you purchased for each calendar year specified. Limit this figure to the products

purchased by your firm (or by members of your trade association) alone. Please provide 

estimates if precise figures are unavailable.

2016 Value:

2015 Value:

2017 Value:

2016 Quantity:

2015 Quantity:

2017 Quantity:

No No BCI BCI BCI BCI BCI BCI

See addendum for additional information.
#### Tarantine *v.*Tarantine *et al.*

No. 3093.

November 17, 1922.

Petition for injunction. Before Judge Ellis. Fulton superior court. January 11, 1922.

*T. J. Lewis*and *T. L: Slappey,*for plaintiff.

*Candler, Thomson & Hirsch*and *Ghalmers & Stewart,*for defendants.

Beck, P. J.

Under the pleadings and evidence in this case, the court did not err in refusing the interlocutory injunction.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4937 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the limitation 

on the estate tax valuation of certain real property used in farming 

or other trades or businesses. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 26, 2023 

Mr. PANETTA (for himself and Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

the limitation on the estate tax valuation of certain real 

property used in farming or other trades or businesses. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Preserving Family 

5 Farms Act of 2023’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4937 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN LIMITATION ON THE ESTATE TAX 

2 VALUATION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY 

3 USED IN FARMING OR OTHER TRADES OR 

4 BUSINESSES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2032A(a)(2) of the Inter6 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

7 ‘‘$750,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$13,000,000’’. 

8 (b) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.—Section 2032A(a)(3) 

9 of such Code is amended— 

10 (1) by striking ‘‘$750,000’’ both places it ap11 pears and inserting ‘‘$13,000,000’’, 

12 (2) by striking ‘‘1998’’ in the matter preceding 

13 subparagraph (A) and inserting ‘‘2023’’, and 

14 (3) by striking ‘‘1997’’ in subparagraph (B) 

15 and inserting ‘‘2022’’. 

16 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

17 this section shall apply to the estates of decedents dying 

18 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4411 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

5302 Galveston Road in Houston, Texas, as the ‘‘Vanessa Guille ́n Post 

Office Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 15, 2022 

Mr. CRUZ (for himself and Mr. CORNYN) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 5302 Galveston Road in Houston, Texas, as 

the ‘‘Vanessa Guille ́n Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. VANESSA GUILLE ́ N POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 5302 Galveston Road in Hous6 ton, Texas, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘Vanessa Guille ́n Post Office Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 4411 IS

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Vanessa Guille ́n Post 

3 Office Building’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
#### Dennis LARAMORE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

No. 69447.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District. Division One.

June 11, 1996.

Rose M. Wibbenmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Kurt U. Schaefer, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and GRIMM, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the motion court’s judgment denying Rule 24.035 post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999             MAR-28-1998
<CASH>                                             253                  23,330
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  108,470                  23,081
<ALLOWANCES>                                       717                     234
<INVENTORY>                                     75,078                  24,851
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               208,705                  84,538
<PP&E>                                         174,000                  47,041
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,630                   2,010
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,473,731                 869,551
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          244,111                  64,374
<BONDS>                                        402,196                 202,377
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          647,343                 217,335
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           670                     291
<OTHER-SE>                                    (36,312)                (63,597)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,473,731                 869,551
<SALES>                                        261,050                  89,385
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               261,050                  89,385
<CGS>                                          104,128                  37,734
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  212,693                  70,654
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,119                  65,796
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   717                      94
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,579                  12,837
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,942                (63,316)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,112                   (360)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,830                (62,956)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                   1,876
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,830                (64,832)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.12                  (2.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.12                  (2.23)
        

</TABLE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 13, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4785

Duravant LLC and FMH Conveyors Americas:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests and the 

request failed to show that this particular product is available only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4160 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4160

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend title 40, United States Code, to grant the Supreme Court of 
   the United States security-related authorities equivalent to the 
                  legislative and executive branches.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Supreme Court Police Parity Act of 
2022''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO PROTECT FAMILY MEMBERS.

    Section 6121(a)(2) of title 40, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in subparagraph (B), by adding ``and'' after the 
        semicolon; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(C) any member of the immediate family of the 
                Chief Justice, any Associate Justice, or any officer of 
                the Supreme Court if the Marshal determines such 
                protection is necessary.''.

            Passed the Senate May 9, 2022.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
117th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 4160

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend title 40, United States Code, to grant the Supreme Court of 
   the United States security-related authorities equivalent to the 
                  legislative and executive branches.
```
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 13, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2112

Ardagh Group:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn