alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3925

Helen of Troy:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's 10-Q for the six months and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             37
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  12,699
<ALLOWANCES>                                      260
<INVENTORY>                                    13,493
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               26,856
<PP&E>                                         27,710
<DEPRECIATION>                                  2,486
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 57,436
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          11,257
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                           56
<OTHER-SE>                                     42,163
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   57,436
<SALES>                                        41,215
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               41,215
<CGS>                                          36,651
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  36,651
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                4,658
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  4
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (98)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (98)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                      317
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .05



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 55 (Wednesday, March 22, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15138]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6986]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. TM95-7-23-000]


Eastern Shore Natural Gas Co.; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

March 16, 1995.
    Take notice that on March 14, 1995 Eastern Shore Natural Gas 
Company (ESNG) tendered certain revised tariff sheets included in 
Appendix A to the filing. Such sheets are proposed to be effective 
April 1, 1995.
    ESNG states that the above referenced tariff sheets are being filed 
pursuant to Section 154.308 of the Commission's regulations and Section 
24 of the General Terms and Conditions of ESNG's FERC Gas Tariff to 
reflect: (1) Changes in storage fuel retention percentages; and (2) 
changes in ESNG's pipeline suppliers' storage service rates.
    ESNG states that copies of the filing have been served upon its 
customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rule 211 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR Section 385.211). 
All such protests should be filed on or before March 23, 1995. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Copies of the filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-6986 Filed 3-21-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4241

Tianhai Electric North America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**STATEMENTOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the period ended September 30, 2005 (the “Form 10-Q”) of CardinalFinancial Corporation, I, Bernard H. Clineburg, Chairman, President and ChiefExecutive Officer, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to myknowledge:

 

(a)           the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(b)           theinformation contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of theCompany and its subsidiaries as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.

 

 
| Date: November 9, 2005 |  /s/ Bernard H. Clineburg                   |   |
|-----------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                        | Bernard H. Clineburg                             |   |
|                        | Chairman, President and Chief Executive  Officer |

 

----
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

April 12, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4552

ECM Industries LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_04.15.19.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 47 (Friday, March 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13206-13207]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5859]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Fiscal Service
[Dept. Circ. 570, 1994 Rev., Supp. No. 13; 4-00236]


Harco National Insurance Company; Surety Companies Acceptable on 
Federal Bonds; Redomestication

    Harco National Insurance Company has redomesticated from the state 
of New York to the State of Illinois effective December 31, 1994. The 
company was last listed as an acceptable surety on Federal bonds at 59 
FR 34158, July 1, 1994.
    Federal bond-approving officers should annotate their reference 
copies of the Treasury Circular 570, 1994 revision, on page 34158 to 
reflect this change.
    Questions concerning this notice may be directed to the Surety Bond 
Branch, Funds Management Division, Financial Management Service, 
Department of the Treasury, 3700 East West Highway, Rm. 6F04, 
Hyattsville, MD 20782, telephone (FTS/202) 874-6507.

    [[Page 13207]] Dated: March 3, 1995.
Charles F. Schwan III,
Director, Funds Management Division, Financial Management Service.
[FR Doc. 95-5859 Filed 3-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
#### Bruce E. HARRIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 40573.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Nov. 15, 1988.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Dec. 27, 1988.

Joseph H. Locascio, Sp. Public Defender, Daniel C. Miller, Asst. Sp. Public Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before FENNER, P.J., and MANFORD and GAITAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

ORDER

Appeal from denial of Rule 27.26 motion for postconviction relief.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4460

Valmet, Inc: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-07-091-CR

DOMINGO LUCIO HERNANDEZ	APPELLANT

A/K/A DOMINGO HERNANDEZ

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	------------

	FROM THE 372ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	On February 23, 2007, appellant Domingo Lucio Hernandez a/k/a Domingo Hernandez pled guilty to indecency with a child.  See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 21.11(a), (c) (Vernon 2003).  Pursuant to a plea agreement, he was sentenced to two years’ confinement.

	On February 23, 2007, the trial court entered its certification of defendant’s right to appeal in accordance with rule 25.2(a)(2).  Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).  The certification states that appellant “has waived the right of appeal.”

	Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal on March 16, 2007 challenging his conviction.  On March 23, 2007, we notified appellant that the certification indicating that he had waived his right to appeal had been filed in this court and that the appeal would be dismissed unless appellant or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), 44.3.  Appellant filed a response; however, it does not show grounds for continuing the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2)(A)–(B); Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006); Blanco v. State, 18 S.W.3d 218, 219-20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000); Estrada v. State, 149 S.W.3d 280, 285 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, pet. ref’d).

	Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), 43.2(f). 

							PER CURIAM

PANEL D:	LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: April 26, 2007
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
General Growth Properties, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-11067, 333-15907, 333-17021, 333-23035, 333-37247, 333-37383,
333-41603, 333-58045, 333-68505, 333-76379, 333-76757, 333-82134, 333-82569,
333-84419, 333-88813, 333-88819 and 333-91621) on Form S-3 and the registration
statements (Nos. 33-79372, 333-07241, 333-11237, 333-28449, 333-74461 and
333-79737) on Form S-8 of General Growth Properties, Inc. of our report dated
February 2, 2004, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of GGP/Homart,
Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related
consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, stockholders' equity
and cash flows for the years then ended, and our report dated February 2, 2004,
with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of GGP/Homart II L.L.C. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated
statements of income and comprehensive income, members' capital and cash flows
for the years then ended, which reports appear in the December 31, 2003 annual
report on Form 10-K of General Growth Properties, Inc.

Our reports refer to a change in the method of accounting for intangible assets
in 2002.

KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
March 11, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 53 (Monday, March 20, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 14724]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6808]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Agency Form Under Review by the Office of Management and Budget

    DOC has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for 
clearance the following proposal for collection of information under 
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
    Agency: Bureau of the Census.
    Title: Survey of Income and Program Participation - 1993 Panel 
Waves 9 and 10.
    Form Number(s): SIPP-13900.
    Agency Approval Number: 0607-0759.
    Type of Request: Revision of a currently approved collection.
    Burden: 42,000 hours.
    Number of Respondents: 42,000.
    Avg Hours Per Response: 30 minutes.
    Needs and Uses: The Survey of Income and Program Participation 
(SIPP) is a longitudinal, demographic, household survey in which the 
Census Bureau interviews sample households in waves occurring every 4 
months over a 2 \1/2\ year period. The survey is molded around a 
central ``core'' of labor force and income questions that remain fixed 
during each wave of a panel. The core is periodically supplemented with 
questions designed to answer specific needs. These supplemental 
questions are referred to as ``topical modules.'' The Census Bureau is 
requesting an extension of the 1993 Panel to conduct two additional 
waves of interviews extending the life of the 1993 Panel to three 
years. The topical modules for Wave 9 include the following: 1) 
Retirement Expectations and Pension Plan Coverage, 2) Work Schedule, 3) 
Child Care, 4) Children's Well-being, 5) Child Support Agreements, 6) 
Support for Nonhousehold Members, and 7) Basic Needs. Wave 9 interviews 
will be conducted from October 1995 through January 1996. Wave 10 
interviews will have no topical modules and will be conducted from 
October 1995 through January 1996.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Frequency: Each Wave is done once during the panel.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    OMB Desk Officer: Maria Gonzalez, (202) 395-7313.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Gerald Tache, DOC Forms Clearance Officer, (202) 
482-3271, Department of Commerce, room 5312, 14th and Constitution 
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Maria Gonzalez, OMB Desk Officer, room 
10201, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.

    Dated: March 14, 1995.
Gerald Tache,
Departmental Forms Clearance Officer, Office of Management and 
Organization.
[FR Doc. 95-6808 Filed 3-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-07-F
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7001

SHARU BEY,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

WARDEN GERRI LEVISTER,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, 

District Judge. (5:12-hc-02266-FL)

Submitted: October 25, 2013 Decided: October 31, 2013

Before DAVIS, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sharu Bey, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Sharu Bey, a federal prisoner, appeals the district 

court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 

2006 & Supp. 2013) petition and denying reconsideration. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Bey v. Warden Gerri Levister, No. 5:12-hc-02266-FL 

(E.D.N.C. Jan. 24 & May 31, 2013). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 13, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3653

Omega Environmental Technologies, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements of Dearborn Bancorp Inc. on Form S-2 (Registration No. 333-116857)
and Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-129769) of our reports dated March 8, 2006
with respect to the 2005 consolidated financial statements of Dearborn Bancorp,
Inc., and management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting, which reports are included in the 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Dearborn Bancorp, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2005.

                                         /s/ Crowe Chizek and Company LLC
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Crowe Chizek and Company LLC

Grand Rapids, Michigan
March 13, 2006