alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3548

Tianhai Electric North America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TECHNISOURCE,
INC.'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>


<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                        15,779,690
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 21,457,605
<ALLOWANCES>                                  358,933
<INVENTORY>                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              38,427,526
<PP&E>                                        0
<DEPRECIATION>                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                41,597,873
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         5,041,955
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                      103,850
<OTHER-SE>                                    30,096,956
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  41,597,873
<SALES>                                       37,724,348
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              37,724,348
<CGS>                                         29,101,053
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 29,101,053
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              7,462,096
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            247
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               1,385,721
<INCOME-TAX>                                  554,287
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           831,434
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                  831,434
<EPS-BASIC>                                 0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0.08


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

NORMAN BLACKWELL,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 306 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 27th day of January, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,683
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,869
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,258)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,926
<PP&E>                                          12,675
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,591)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,491
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,641
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           63,053
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           141
<OTHER-SE>                                    (60,378)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,491
<SALES>                                         10,037
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,266
<CGS>                                            8,378
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,499
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 458
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (16,691)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        45
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (16,736)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (16,736)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.20)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 52 (Friday, March 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 14448]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6624]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigations Nos. 731-TA-684 and 685 (Final)]


Fresh Cut Roses From Colombia and Ecuador

Determinations

    On the basis of the record<SUP>1 developed in the subject 
investigations, the Commission determines,<SUP>2 pursuant to section 
735(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1673d(b)) (the Act), that 
an industry in the United States is not materially injured or 
threatened with material injury, and the establishment of an industry 
in the United States is not materially retarded, by reason of imports 
from Colombia and Ecuador of fresh cut roses, provided for in 
subheading 0603.10.60 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 
States, that have been found by the Department of Commerce to be sold 
in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV).

    \1\The record is defined in Sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's 
rules of practice and procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
    \2\Vice Chairman Nuzum and Commissioner Rohr dissenting.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted these investigations effective September 
16, 1994, following a preliminary determination by the Department of 
Commerce that imports of fresh cut roses from Colombia and Ecuador were 
being sold at LTFV within the meaning of section 733(b) of the Act (19 
U.S.C. 1673b(b)). Notice of the institution of the Commission's 
investigations and of a public hearing to be held in connection 
therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of 
the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and 
by publishing the notice in the Federal Register of October 20, 1994 
(59 FR 52989). The hearing was held in Washington, DC, on January 26, 
1995, and all persons who requested the opportunity were permitted to 
appear in person or by counsel.
    The Commission transmitted its determinations in these 
investigations to the Secretary of Commerce on March 13, 1995. The 
views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 2862 (March 
1995), entitled ``Fresh Cut Roses from Colombia and Ecuador: 
Investigations Nos. 731-TA-684 and 685 (Final).''

    Issued: March 13, 1995.

    By order of the Commission.
Donna R. Koehnke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-6624 Filed 3-16-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-20733

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

FRANK FLORES,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:16-CR-273-3

Before HIGGINSON, COSTA, and HO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Frank Flores has moved for leave to 

withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 

U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Flores has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the 

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 20, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-20733 Document: 00514649538 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/20/2018
No. 17-20733

2

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is 

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

We note, however, that there is a clerical error in the written judgment. 

The written judgment references 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B)(viii), which is correct 

for Flores’s offense of possession with intent to distribute 5 grams or more of 

methamphetamine. The written judgment erroneously describes the nature of 

the offense as possession with intent to distribute 5 “kilograms” or more of 

methamphetamine. The word “kilograms” should be replaced with “grams”

under Nature of Offense. Accordingly, we REMAND for correction of the 

clerical error in the written judgment in accordance with Federal Rule of 

Criminal Procedure 36. See United States v. Hernandez, 719 F. App’x 395, (5th 

Cir. 2018); United States v. Perez-Gonzalez, 294 F. App’x 854, 855 (5th Cir. 

2008).

 Case: 17-20733 Document: 00514649538 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/20/2018
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 58 (Monday, March 27, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15759]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7406]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-131-001]


Northern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

March 21, 1995.
    Take notice that on March 16, 1995, Northern Natural Gas Company 
(Northern), tendered for filing to become part of Northern's FERC Gas 
Tariff, Fifth Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, 
proposed to be effective February 1, 1995 and March 1, 1995:

Substitute Sixth Revised Sheet No. 60 Substitute Seventh Revised 
Sheet No. 60

    Northern if filing to correct a typographical error on one of the 
MID rates. The Rate for firm transportation from Receipt District 14 to 
Delivery District 17 (APR-OCT) was misstated and should be reduced as 
follows:

--On Substitute Sixth Revised Sheet No. 60: From 5.23 to 4.88 cents 
per MMBtu
--On Substitute Seventh Revised Sheet No. 60: From 4.41 to 4.06 
cents per MMBtu

    Northern further states that copies of the filing have been mailed 
to each of its customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rule 211 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211). All such 
protests must be filed on or before March 28, 1995. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate proceeding. 
Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available 
for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-7406 Filed 3-24-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-10457 Conference Calendar

BENJAMIN A. POTTS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus $161,532 IN U.S. CURRENCY (161091); $80,190 IN U.S. CURRENCY(161092), Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:95-MC-039-Y

- - - - - - - - - - April 10, 1998 Before JOLLY, JONES, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Benjamin A. Potts, federal prisoner # 17034-077, appeals from the district court’s order granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment and denying Potts’ motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties and affirm the district court’s order granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment based on Potts’ failure to show that he has standing to sue.No. -2-
AFFIRMED.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4100

Tianhai Electric North America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

April 12, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4455

ECM Industries LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_04.15.19.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXHIBIT 32.2**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**In connection with the Quarterly Report of Payless ShoeSource, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending April 29, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Ullrich E. Porzig, Senior Vice President — Chief Financial Officerand Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.Date: June 6, 2006                                                              /s/  Ullrich E. Porzig   Ullrich E. Porzig   Senior Vice President,Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
**EXHIBIT 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8(Nos. 33-49758, 33-85744, 333-07541, 333-85131, 333-65812, 333-84356, 333-102185, 333-112815 and333-131703) and Forms S-3 (Nos. 333-69999, 333-53484 and 333-98475) of Abaxis, Inc. of our reportsdated June 13, 2007 relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule ofAbaxis, Inc. as of March 31, 2007 and 2006 and for each of the two years in the period ended March31, 2007, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reportingas of March 31, 2007 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of March31, 2007, which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K./s/ Burr, Pilger & Mayer LLP
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 57 (Friday, March 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15556]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7249]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Project No. 2744-009]


Notice of Application

March 20, 1995.
    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been 
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection:

a. Type of Application: Transfer of License and Approval of Lease.
b. Project No.: 2744-019.
c. Date Filed: March 7, 1995.
d. Applicant: Menominee Company.
e. Name of Project: Menominee/Park Mill.
f. Location: Menominee River, Marinette County, Wisconsin, and 
Menominee County, Michigan.
g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. Secs. 791(a)-
825(r).
h. Applicant Contact: Nancy J. Skancke Grammer, Kissel, Robbins & 
Skancke 1225 Eye Street, N.W., Suite 1225 Washington, DC 20005 (202) 
408-5400.
i. FERC Contact: Mark Hooper, (202) 219-2680.
j. Comment Date: April 6, 1995.
k. Description of Transfer and Lease: Menominee Company (Menominee) 
proposes to transfer to N.E.W. Hydro, Inc. (N.E.W.) its license. 
N.E.W. requests approval of the lease arrangement between N.E.W. and 
Menominee.

    1. This notice also consists of the following standard 
paragraphs: B, C1, and D2.
    B. Comments Protests, or Motions to Intervene--Anyone may submit 
comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene in accordance with the 
requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, 
.211, .214. In determining the appropriate action to take, the 
Commission will consider all protests or other comments filed, but 
only those who file aa motion to intervene in accordance with the 
Commission's Rules may become a party to the proceeding. Any 
comments, protests, or motions to intervene must be received on or 
before the specified comment date for the particular application.
    C1. Filing and Service of Responsive Documents.--Any filings 
must bear in all capital letters the title ``COMMENTS'' 
``RECOMMENDATIONS FOR TERMS AND CONDITIONS'', ``PROTEST'', OR 
``MOTION TO INTERVENE'', as applicable, and the Project Number of 
the particular application to which the filing refers. Any of the 
above-named documents must be filed by providing the original and 
the number of copies provided by the Commission's regulations to: 
The Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North 
Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426. A copy of any motion 
to intervene must also be served upon each representative of the 
Applicant specified in the particular application.
    D2. Agency Comment--Federal, state, and local agencies are 
invited to file comments on the described application. A copy of the 
application may be obtained by agencies directly from the Applicant. 
If an agency does not file comments within the time specified for 
filing comments, it will be presumed to have to comments. One copy 
of an agency's comment must also be sent to the Applicant's 
representatives.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-7249 Filed 3-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M