alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 58 (Monday, March 27, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15760-15761]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7410]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-210-000]


Transwestern Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

March 21, 1995.
    Take notice that on March 17, 1995, Transwestern Pipeline Company 
(Transwestern), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, with a 
proposed effective date of April 17, 1995:


5th Revised Sheet No. 52


    Transwestern states that the above-referenced tariff sheet is being 
filed to revise Transwestern's quality specifications regarding the 
percentage of carbon dioxide that will be allowable for gas delivered 
into its system. Transwestern requests an effective date of April 17, 
1995, for this tariff sheet. Specifically, Transwestern proposes to 
revise Sec. 2.1 (E) and (F) of the General Terms and Conditions of its 
FERC Gas Tariff that currently provide that gas delivered into its 
system must contain no more than three percent of carbon dioxide and no 
more than a combined total of four percent of carbon dioxide plus 
nitrogen.
    Transwestern proposes to modify its tariff language to reduce the 
percentage of carbon dioxide from three percent to two percent and 
reduce the percentage of carbon dioxide plus nitrogen from four percent 
to three percent. Transwestern seeks these modifications in an effort 
to conform its quality specifications for the allowable percentage of 
carbon dioxide with those percentages of pipelines upstream and 
downstream of Transwestern's system as well as to conform with the gas 
quality specifications of pipelines with [[Page 15761]] which it 
competes in providing transportation services. Such modifications will 
also result in safer and more efficient pipeline operations on 
Transwestern's system.
    Transwestern states that copies of the filing were served on its 
gas utility customers, interested state commissions, and all parties to 
this proceeding.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules 
of Practice and Procedure. All such motions or protests should be filed 
on or before March 28, 1995. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person 
wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of 
this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-7410 Filed 3-24-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Attorneys and Counselors

Thompson, Coe, Cousins & Irons, L.L.P. 

Plaza of the Americas | 700 N. Pearl Street, Twenty-Fifth Floor | Dallas, Texas 75201-2832 | (214) 871-8200 | Fax: (214) 871-8209

Michael A. Yanof

Direct Dial: (214) 871-8270

myanof@thompsoncoe.com

Austin

Dallas

Houston

Los Angeles

Saint Paul

January 7, 2015 

Lisa Matz Via E-Filing

Clerk of Court 

Fifth Court of Appeals 

600 Commerce St., Suite 200 

Dallas, TX 75202-4658 

Re: No. 05-14-01464-CV; Sheri Durham and Denise Jenkins, as Administrator of the 

Estate of Jessica Haley Durham v. Children’s Medical Center of Dallas, Amy 

Holland, CPNP, David W. Kines, FNP, Lawson Copley, M.D., J. Patrick Hieber, 

M.D. and Timothy J. Rupp, M.D.

Dear Ms. Matz:

The Clerk’s Record and Supplemental Clerk’s Record are now on file with the Court. 

Would you please provide a CD to me as one of the attorneys representing Appellee Amy 

Holland, CPNP. 

I appreciate your assistance, and please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions. 

Very truly yours,

/s/ Michael A. Yanof 

Michael A. Yanof

cc: Kenneth Chaiken 

Chaiken & Chaiken, P.C. 

Legacy Town Center III

5801 Tennyson Parkway, Suite 440 

Plano, Texas 75024 

kchaiken@chaikenlaw.com 

Counsel for Appellants 

ACCEPTED

05-14-01464-CV

FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS

DALLAS, TEXAS

1/7/2015 1:48:54 PM

LISA MATZ

CLERK

 FILED IN 5th COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 1/7/2015 1:48:54 PM LISA MATZ Clerk
January 7, 2015

Page 2

Michelle E. Robberson

John A. Scully

Cory Sutker

Cooper & Scully, P.C.

900 Jackson St., Suite 100

Dallas, Texas 75202

michelle.robberson@cooperscully.com

john.scully@cooperscully.com

cory.sutker@cooperscully.com

Counsel for Appellee Children’s Medical Center

David M. Walsh IV

Jeffrey Kershaw

Chamblee, Ryan, Kershaw & Anderson, P.C.

2777 Stemmons Freeway, Suite 1157

Dallas, Texas 75207

dmwalsh@chambleeryan.com

jmkershaw@chambleeryan.com

Counsel for Appellee Timothy J. Rupp, M.D.

Stan Thiebaud

Stinnett Thiebaud & Remington 

1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 4800

Dallas, Texas 75202-2701

sthiebaud@strlaw.net

Counsel for Appellee J. Patrick Hieber, M.D.

Ronald W. Johnson

Touchstone Bernays

4040 Renaissance Tower

1201 Elm Street

Dallas, Texas 75270-2196

Ron.johnson@tbjbs.com

Counsel for Appellee David W. Kines, FNP

C. Timothy Reynolds

Steed Dunnill Reynolds Murphy Lamberth, LLP

1010 W. Ralph Hall Pkwy., 2nd Floor

Rockwall, TX 75032

timreynolds@steedlawfirm.com

Counsel for Appellee Lawson Copley, M.D.

2132888v1

00093.198
#### Dana HALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 55977.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

June 13, 1989.

Felicia A. Jones, Clayton, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Robert V. Franson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the trial court’s judgment denying a Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The trial court’s judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears.

An opinion would have no precedential value.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Curtis LOMAX, Appellant. Curtis LOMAX, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. 66361, 69144.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.

Sept. 3, 1996.

Raymond J. Capelovitch, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Kurt U. Schaefer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before AHRENS, C.J., and CRANDALL and GRIMM, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the trial court’s judgment entered on his conviction of delivery of a controlled substance. § 195.211 RSMo 1994. Defendant also appeals the motion court’s denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post conviction relief. Both appeals have been consolidated for review pursuant to Rule 29.15(e).

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgments of the trial court and motion court are affirmed pursuant to Rules 84.16(b) and 30.25(b).
Exhibit 32.2

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Killbuck Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Craig Lawhead, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     
|---------------------
|By: /s/ Craig Lawhead
|                     
|Craig Lawhead        
|Treasurer            
|May 12, 2010         

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Killbuck Bancshares, Inc. and will be retained by Killbuck Bancshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 57 (Friday, March 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15588-15589]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7360]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Office of Justice Programs
[OJP No. 1044 and ZRIN 1121-ZA08]


1995-96 National Institute of Justice Research Plan

AGENCY: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, 
National Institute of Justice.

ACTION: Notice of the availability of the 1995-96 National Institute of 
Justice Research Plan.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Institute of Justice (NIJ) is publishing this 
Notice of the availability of its 1995-96 National Institute of Justice 
Research Plan.

DATES: The deadlines for receipt of proposals are Thursday, June 15, 
1995; Friday, December 15, 1995; Monday, June 17, 1996; and Monday, 
December 16, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Comments should be addressed to the National Institute of 
Justice, 633 Indiana Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20531.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeremy Travis, Director, National 
Institute of Justice, 633 Indiana Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20531. To 
obtain copies of the 1995-96 National Institute of Justice Research 
Plan, call the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS), 1-
800-851-3420, Box 6000, Rockville, MD 20850. The Plan is also available 
electronically via the National Criminal Justice Reference Service 
Bulletin Board (NCJRS*BBS). If you have Internet access; telnet to 
ncjrsbbs.aspensys.com or gopher to ncjrs.aspensys.com 71. Users without 
Internet access may direct dial to (301) 738-8895. Modems should be set 
at 9600 Baud and N-8-1. The NIJ Research Plan is listed under the 
``National Institute of Justice Information'' menu.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following supplementary information is 
provided:

Authority

    This action is authorized under the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe 
Streets Act of 1968, Secs. 201-03, as amended, 42 U.S.C. Secs. 3721-23 
(1988).

Background

    The 1995-96 National Institute of Justice Research Plan outlines 
the NIJ research and evaluation agenda for 1995, provides descriptions 
of program [[Page 15589]] areas for which research and evaluation 
proposals will be solicited, provides application instructions and 
forms, outlines requirements for award recipients, and lists contact 
persons for program areas.
Jeremy Travis,
Director, National Institute of Justice.
[FR Doc. 95-7360 Filed 3-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-18-P
#### Thomas P. GILMORE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jerald P. VALENTI and Mary M. Valenti, Defendants-Respondents.

No. 68489.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

March 19, 1996.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 24, 1996.

Application to Transfer Denied May 28, 1996.

Gail G. Renshaw, Nicholas J. Riggio, Sr., St. Louis, for appellant.

Vernon R. Dawdy, Fenton, for respondents.

Before CRAHAN, P.J., and CRANDALL and DOWD, JJ.

*90ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Thomas P. Gilmore appeals the circuit court’s summary judgment entered in favor of defendants Jerald P. Valenti and Mary M. Valenti. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of evidence; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
￿$XWRGHVN￿￿￿￿￿￿￿

￿$XWRGHVN￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿$XWRGHVN￿￿￿￿￿￿￿
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-2086

UNTE CHEH, Dr., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus NILS D. DIAZ, Chairman, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission; UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-03-2414-8-AW) Submitted: August 25, 2006 Decided: September 15, 2006 Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unte Cheh, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Michael DiBiagio, United States Attorney, Tarra R. DeShields-Minnis, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* We did not consider any filings submitted after April 27, 2006, because the court made clear that it would consider only pleadings submitted on or before that date. - 2 - PER CURIAM: Dr. Unte Cheh appeals the district court’s order denying relief in his civil action asserting employment discrimination and other claims against his former employer. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. * Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. SeeCheh v. Diaz , No. CA-03-2414-8-AW (D. Md. June 10, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bright Horizons Family
Solutions, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), each of the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
         in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.


                                            By: /s/ David H. Lissy
                                               -------------------
                                               David H. Lissy
                                               Chief Executive Officer
                                               August 14, 2003


                                            By:  /s/ Elizabeth J. Boland
                                               -------------------------
                                               Elizabeth J. Boland
                                               Chief Financial Officer
                                               August 14, 2003
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000895516
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                         558506
<SECURITIES>                                   2980000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  8718414
<ALLOWANCES>                                   125000
<INVENTORY>                                    2796226
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               15109328
<PP&E>                                         1177926
<DEPRECIATION>                                 375470
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 21860667
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          11939178
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       44200
<OTHER-SE>                                     8450249
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   21860667
<SALES>                                        12751561
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               15437190
<CGS>                                          10029596
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  15242116
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               146131
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             567848
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                975439
<INCOME-TAX>                                   439056
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            536383
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   536383
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .12
        


</TABLE>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-05-00363-CR

NO. 03-05-00364-CR

Tommy Wayne Davis, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 147TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NOS. D-1-DC-03-205225 & D-1-DC-04-301944

HONORABLE WILFORD FLOWERS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Mr. James R. Smith, appellant’s appointed counsel on appeal, moves to withdraw,

citing his recent employment by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. The motion is granted. The

appeals are abated and the district court is ordered to immediately appoint substitute counsel. A copy

of the order of appointment shall be delivered to this Court no later than August 24, 2005.

__________________________________________

W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Patterson and Puryear

Filed: August 19, 2005

Do Not Publish
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2129

Reelcraft Industries:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2289

WTEC Texas, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 8 (Thursday, January 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 3030]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-794]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Advisory Committee on Women Veterans, Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs gives notice under Pub. L. 92-
463 that a meeting of the Advisory Committee on Women Veterans will be 
held March 28-30, 1995, in Washington, DC. The purpose of the Advisory 
Committee on Women Veterans is to advise the Secretary regarding the 
needs of women veterans with respect to health care, rehabilitation, 
compensation, outreach and other programs administered by the 
Department of Veterans Affairs, and the activities of the Department of 
Veterans Affairs designed to meet such needs. The Committee will make 
recommendations to the Secretary regarding such activities.
    The sessions will convene on March 28 9 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.; March 29 
9 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.; March 30 9 a.m. to 12 noon in Room 230, VA Central 
Office Building, 810 Vermont Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC. All sessions 
will be open to the public up to the seating capacity of the room. 
Because this capacity is limited, it will be necessary for those 
wishing to attend to contact Ms. Maryanne Carson, Department of 
Veterans Affairs (phone 202/273-5078) prior to March 8, 1995.

    Dated: January 5, 1995.

    By Direction of the Secretary.
Heyward Bannister,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-794 Filed 1-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M