alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4481

OMRON Management Center of America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SIMIONE CENTRAL HOLDINGS, INC. FOR THE NINE MONTH PERIOD
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                      19,530,966
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,099,302
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,278,312
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            29,068,535
<PP&E>                                       3,021,927
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,098,094
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              36,383,153
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,780,559
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,501
<OTHER-SE>                                  26,302,608
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                36,383,153
<SALES>                                     34,776,714
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            34,776,714
<CGS>                                       16,131,302
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               16,131,302
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            16,194,580
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             185,702
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,511,360
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,511,360
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,511,360
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .33


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5095 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5095

  To freeze hiring activity for the Department of Education, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 1, 2023

  Mr. Bean of Florida (for himself, Mrs. Miller of Illinois, and Mr. 
    Moran) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
   Committee on Education and the Workforce, and in addition to the 
Committee on Appropriations, for a period to be subsequently determined 
 by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as 
        fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To freeze hiring activity for the Department of Education, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fostering Resource Efficiency in 
Education by Zero Employment Act'' or the ``FREEZE Act''.

SEC. 2. HIRING FREEZE AND OTHER LIMITATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Beginning on the date of the enactment of this 
Act--
            (1) no individual may be appointed to any position within 
        the Department of Education; and
            (2) no new position may be established at the Department of 
        Education.
    (b) Rescission of Excess Sums.--There is permanently rescinded, 
from the unobligated balance of all amounts appropriated or otherwise 
made available for the salaries and expenses of the Department of 
Education as of the date of the enactment of this Act, such sums as may 
be in excess of the amount required to cover the salary or expenses of 
each person employed by the Department as of such date of enactment.
    (c) Limitation on the Use of Funds.--No Federal funds may be 
obligated or expended for the salary of any position or employee in 
violation of subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 55 (Wednesday, March 22, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15161]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6898]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION
[Finance Docket No. 32433]


Chicago & North Western Railway Co.--Construction Exemption--
Douglas County, Wisconsin

    The Chicago & North Western Railway Co. (CNW) has petitioned the 
Interstate Commerce Commission (Commission) for authority to construct 
and operate a 2,900-foot rail line extension which would provide CNW 
with access to the Midwest Energy Resources Company coal dock facility 
in Superior, Wisconsin. The Commission's Section of Environmental 
Analysis (SEA) has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA) for this 
project. Based on the information provided and the environmental 
analysis conducted to date, this EA concludes that this proposal should 
not significantly affect the quality of the human environment if the 
recommended mitigation measures set forth in the EA are implemented. 
Accordingly, SEA preliminarily recommends that the Commission impose on 
any decision approving the proposed construction and operation 
conditions requiring CNW to implement the mitigation contained in the 
EA.
    The EA will be served on all parties of record as well as all 
appropriate Federal, state and local officials and will be made 
available to the public upon request. SEA will consider all comments 
received in response to the EA in making final environmental 
recommendations to the Commission. The Commission will then consider 
SEA's final recommendations and the environmental record in making its 
final decision in this proceeding.
    Comments (an original and 10 copies) and any questions regarding 
this Environmental Assessment should be filed with the Commission's 
Section of Environmental Analysis, Office of Economic and Environmental 
Analysis, Room 3219, Interstate Commerce Commission, Washington, DC 
20423, to the attention of Dana White (202) 927-6214. Requests for 
copies of the EA should also be directed to Ms. White.
    Date made available to the public: March 22, 1995.
    Comment due date: April 21, 1995.

    By the Commission, Elaine K. Kaiser, Chief, Section of 
Environmental Analysis, Office of Economic and Environmental 
Analysis.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-6898 Filed 3-21-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7035-01-P
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

BETTY TOLBERT and GARY TOLBERT,

Appellants,

v.

PEOPLES TRUST INSURANCE COMPANY,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-2285

[July 13, 2022]

Appeal of nonfinal order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth 

Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Carlos A. Rodriguez, Judge; L.T. Case 

No. CACE20-7236.

Samuel Alexander of Alexander Appellate Law, P.A., Deland, for 

appellants.

Patrick M. Chidnese and Frieda C. Lindroth of Bickford & Chidnese, 

LLP, Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. People's Trust Insurance Company v. Chen, 333 So. 3d 208 

(Fla. 4th DCA 2022).

GROSS, MAY, and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Document

Exhibit 10.1


FORM OF PREFERRED STOCK AGREEMENT
ALTISOURCE ASSET MANAGEMENT CORPORATION




The undersigned participant (the “Participant”) of the 2016 Employee Preferred Stock Plan (the “Plan”) of ALTISOURCE ASSET MANAGEMENT CORPORATION (the “Company”), a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, hereby acknowledges receipt of              shares of Class      Preferred Stock of the Company (“Preferred Stock”) issued pursuant to the Plan. As required under Section 7 of the Plan, the Participant hereby (i) agrees that such shares of Preferred Stock shall be subject to, and shall be held by [him/her] in accordance with all of the applicable terms and provisions of, the Plan, and (ii) represents and warrants to the Company that [he/she] has acquired such shares of Preferred Stock for investment for [his/her] own account, and (iii) in any event, agrees that [he/she] will not sell or otherwise dispose of said shares other than sales back to the Company upon termination of employment with the Company as required under the provisions of Section 7.02 of the Plan.


The undersigned hereby executes this Preferred Stock Agreement this      day of                     , 202    .


_____________________________________
[name of recipient]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jesse Chisolm, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Alvin Schlesinger, J.), rendered April 15, 1987, convicting defendant, after a bench trial, of attempted manslaughter in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and sentencing him to concurrent indeterminate terms of imprisonment of *2\6*to 7 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant was indicted for the shooting of a police officer. After the People put in their direct case, defense counsel requested a psychiatric evaluation of defendant. The court denied the application.

"At any time after a defendant is arraigned upon an accusatory instrument other than a felony complaint and before the imposition of sentence * * * the court wherein the criminal action is pending must issue an order of examination when it is of the opinion that the defendant may be an incapacitated person” (CPL 730.30 [1]). Whether to order an examination is within the trial court’s discretion. *(People v Gensler,*72 NY2d 239, 245, *cert denied*488 US 932; *People v Colville,*74 AD2d 928.) In deciding whether a defendant is competent to proceed, the court is to take into consideration available medical proof coupled with all other evidence and its own observations of defendant *(People v Gensler, supra,*at 244).

A prior psychiatric examination conducted pursuant to CPL article 730 in 1984 found defendant competent to stand trial. At the *Huntley*hearing, the court was able to observe defendant on the witness stand and found that he was "coherent and responsive to the questions asked of him.” Defendant had also expressed his understanding of the proceedings when the court discussed with him his waiver of a jury trial and whether to call his sister, an involuntary witness, to the stand. Under the circumstances, the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it refused to have defendant reevaluated. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger, Asch and Kassal, JJ.
exv10w1







Exhibit 10.1




	 	 	 

	

	 	Wes Bush

Chief Executive Officer

and President






June 23, 2011




Dear Jim,




This letter serves to confirm the terms of your relocation to Virginia. The Compensation
Committee has approved the following benefits in relation to your relocation:





	 	•	 	A lump sum relocation payment of $750,000 to be paid in lieu of relocation benefits
to which you would otherwise be entitled to under the Company’s relocation policy. The
payment is to be made upon your relocation to the Company’s new headquarters in Falls
Church, Virginia.
	 
	 	•	 	In exchange for this payment, you will forfeit all benefits you would have been
entitled to receive under the company’s relocation policy.





You will not receive any other reimbursements that would normally be provided under the Company’s
relocation policy.




Sincerely,




/s/ WES BUSH

Wes Bush

Chief Executive Officer and President




Accepted:




/s/ JAMES F. PALMER

James F. Palmer

Corporate Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4832

Arrowhead Electrical Products, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5003

OMRON Management Center of America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2234

Titan Flow Control: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions.

pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3358

New Beverage Ventures:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 46 (Thursday, March 9, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12941-12942]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5732]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-177-000]


Southern Natural Gas Co.; Notice of GSR Cost Recovery Filing

March 3, 1995.
    Take notice that on February 28, 1995, Southern Natural Gas Company 
(Southern), set forth its revised demand surcharges and revised 
interruptible rates that will be charged in connection with its 
recovery of GSR costs [[Page 12942]] associated with the payment of 
price differential costs under realigned gas supply contracts or 
contract buyout costs associated with continuing realignment efforts 
during the period November 1, 1994 through January 31, 1995. These GSR 
costs have arisen as a direct result of customers' elections during 
restructuring to terminate their sales entitlements under Order No. 
636. Southern submitted the following tariff sheets to its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Seventh Revised Volume No. 1, with the proposed effective date 
of April 1, 1995.

Sixteenth Revised Sheet No. 15
Sixteenth Revised Sheet No. 17
Sixteenth Revised Sheet No. 18
First Alternate Sixteenth Revised Sheet No. 15
First Alternate Sixteenth Revised Sheet No. 17
Thirteenth Revised Sheet No. 29
Thirteenth Revised Sheet No. 30
Thirteenth Revised Sheet No. 31

    Southern submits alternate sheets to comply with the Commission's 
November 30, 1994 Order requiring Southern to recover its Account No. 
858 costs and Southern Energy LNG costs through the same type of 
quarterly mechanism as the one currently in place for the recovery of 
Southern's gas supply realignment costs. Southern notes that the 
instant filing is made without prejudice to Southern's request for 
rehearing of the November 30, 1994 Order.
    Southern states that copies of the filing were served upon 
Southern's customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules 
of Practice and Procedure. All such motions or protests should be filed 
on or before March 10, 1995. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person 
wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of 
Southern's filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-5732 Filed 3-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 61 (Thursday, March 30, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 16532]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8021]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION


``FEDERAL REGISTER'' CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: March 27, 
1995.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF MEETING: 10:00 a.m., March 30, 
1995.

CHANGES IN MEETING: Meeting concerning Bunk Beds was canceled.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-0709.

CONTACT PERSON FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Sadye E. Dunn, Office of the 
Secretary, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20207 (301) 504-0800.

    Dated: March 28, 1995.
Sadye E. Dunn,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-8021 Filed 3-28-95; 3:47 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-M