alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FedFirst Financial Corporation
10-Q




EXHIBIT
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of FedFirst Financial Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Patrick
G. O’Brien, the President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








Date:
            May
      17, 2010
            
            /s/
      Patrick G. O’BrienPatrick
      G. O’BrienPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

April 12, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4168

Apex Sourcing & Manufacturing: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_04.15.19.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3881

Yaesu USA Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4305 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4305

 To limit the authority of the World Health Organization on the United 
 States and to oppose amendments to the WHO Constitution that have not 
                       been approved by Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2022

  Mr. Scott of Florida introduced the following bill; which was read 
        twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To limit the authority of the World Health Organization on the United 
 States and to oppose amendments to the WHO Constitution that have not 
                       been approved by Congress.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION.

    (a) Effect of World Health Organization Directives and Orders on 
the United States.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 
United States shall not be bound by any directive or order issued by 
the World Health Assembly, the World Health Organization, or any agent 
or branch of the World Health Organization.
    (b) Opposition to Amendments to the Constitution of the World 
Health Organization and Any Other Agreements Among Member States 
Without Congressional Approval.--The Secretary of Health and Human 
Services and any other United States official designated by the 
President to represent the United States at the World Health 
Organization in any capacity shall use the voice, vote, and influence 
of the United States to oppose any amendments to the Constitution of 
the World Health Organization and any other agreements among the member 
states unless Congress has enacted a joint resolution in support of 
such amendments.
                                 <all>
```
NO T REC OM M EN DE D F OR F UL L- TEX T P UB LIC AT ION F ile Nam e: 09a0222n.06 F iled: Marc h 24, 2009 No. 08-3189 UN ITED STA TES C OU RT OF AP P EA LS F OR THE SI XT H C IR CU IT
YURIVLADI MI ROVI CH BRUSNEV, Petitioner,
v. ERI C HOL DER, Attorney Gene ral Re sp on de nt, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ONA P P EAL FO R R E VI EW OF A D ECI SI ONOF TH E B OA RD O F IM M IG RA T IO N A P P E A LS

OPI NI ON

BEF ORE: NO RRIS, CO OK , a nd G RI F F IN , C ir c uitJudg e s. P ER CURIAM . Petitioner Yuri V l ad i mirovich Br usnev, a Russian citizen, applied for asylum, w it

h h o ld in go f

r e mo v a l, an d

p r o te c ti o nun d e r

th e Co n v e n ti o na g a in s t T o rtu r e , a ll eg ing perse cution at the hands of Cheche n bandits due to his nationality and Russian Orthodox faith. He appea ls the decision of a

n immigration judge, subse quently aff irmed by the B oard of

I mmigration Ap p ea l s (“ th e B o ar d ”) , d en yi n g re l i ef an d o rd er i n g h i s re m o v al t o R u s s i a. T h e i m m i gra t i o nj u d ge b a s e d th e d e n i a l o f r e l i e f

o nth e un t i m e l i n e s s o f

p e t i t i o n e r ’ s a s yl u ma

p p l i c at i o nan d , m o r e c r i t i c a l l y, upon a lac k of cr edibility with respec t to the testimony offe red by

petitioner. Inc a s e s li k e th is o n e inv o lv in ga s ylum a n d w it h h o ld in go f

r e mo v a l c la im s , “ [w ]e r e v iew fac tual finding s under the substantial e vidence standard.” Ndrecaj v. Muk asey, 522 F.3d 667, 672 (6th Cir. 2008) (interna l quotation marks omitted). This standard of r eview r eq u i re s u s to take finding s of fa ct as conclusive “unless any rea sonable a djudicator would be compelled to conc ludeNo. 08-3189

BRUSNEV v. H

OLDER

- 2 - to the contra

ry .” Id. at 672-73 (inter

nal quot ation marks omi tted). Apply ing this standar d of re view to the immigration judge’ s fac tual finding s with r espec t to credibility , we a re simply not “compelled to conclude to the c ontrary .” This is not to say that petitioner did not suffer hardship in Russia or that his testimony

was fa lse. I t i s s i m p l y t o s ay that those portions of his testimony that the imm ig ratio n ju dg e de e me d c re dib le we re le g a lly ins uf fi c ie nt t o s up po rt

his c la ims
. Havinghad an oppor

tunity to reviewthe administrative re cord, which includes the te stimony provided to the immigr ation judge , as we ll as the brief s of the par

ties, we a ffirm the B oard’ s decision dated January

28 , 2 0 0 8 , d i s missing petitioner’s a ppeal. B eca

use that dec ision clearly

sets out the proper leg al standar ds and properly defe rs t o the factual finding s of the immigr ation judge , a deta iled written opinion by

this court would serve no useful purpose
. Th e pe tit ion

fo r r e vie w i s denied and the re mov a l or de r i s aff

irm ed
.
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 54 (Tuesday, March 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 14930]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6883]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

Open Meeting of Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Advisory 
Council

AGENCY: Sanctuaries and Reserves Division (SRD), Office of Ocean and 
Coastal Resource Management (OCRM), National Ocean Service (NOS), 
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Department of 
Commerce.

ACTION: Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Advisory Council; notice 
of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Council was established in December 1991 to advise and 
assist the Secretary of Commerce in the development and implementation 
of the comprehensive management plan for the Florida Keys National 
Marine Sanctuary.

TIME AND PLACE: April 4, 1995, from 9 a.m. until adjournment. The 
meeting location will be at the Hawk's Cay Resort, Mile Marker 61, Duck 
Key, Florida.

AGENDA:
1. Discussion of nomination of new officers and distribute charter for 
review.
2. Distribute the Draft Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary 
Management Plan.
3. Receive briefing on contents of draft plan.
4. Discussion of public review process.

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: The meeting will be open to public participation. 
Public comment will be received from 4:30 to 5:30. Seats will be set 
aside for the public and the media. Seats will be available on a first-
come first-served basis.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ben Haskell at (305) 743-2437 or June Cradick at (301) 713-3137.

Federal Domestic Assistance Catalog Number 11.429 Marine Sanctuary 
Program.

    Dated: March 16, 1995.
Frank Maloney,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Ocean Services and Coastal Zone 
Management.
[FR Doc. 95-6883 Filed 3-20-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-08-M
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6187

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KONO MICHELLE HYMAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Elizabeth City. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (2:10-cr-00015-D-1)

Submitted: June 28, 2017 Decided: July 18, 2017

Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kono Michelle Hyman, Appellant Pro Se. Edward D. Gray, Assistant United States 

Attorney, Scott Andrew Lemmon, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, 

Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Kono Michelle Hyman appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to 

reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We review a claim that the 

district court misapprehended the scope of its legal authority under § 3582(c)(2) de novo 

and a district court’s decision on whether to reduce a sentence under that section for 

abuse of discretion. United States v. Mann, 709 F.3d 301, 304 (4th Cir. 2013).

Hyman argues that the district court misapprehended the scope of its authority by 

failing to recognize the extent of the reduction authorized, as required under Dillon v. 

United States, 560 U.S. 817, 827 (2010), and U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual

§ 1B1.10, p.s. (2010). The district court, however, acknowledged Hyman’s request for a 

sentence below his amended Guidelines range and asserted its discretion to reduce 

Hyman’s sentence, which was already at the lowest term in his amended Guidelines 

range. The court therefore understood its authority to reduce Hyman’s sentence. See 

United States v. Stewart, 595 F.3d 197, 203 (4th Cir. 2010) (allowing sentence reduction 

below amended Guidelines range under certain circumstances).

The district court simply declined to do so based on the facts and circumstances of

Hyman’s case, as evaluated under the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) (2012) factors. In light of the

“extremely broad discretion” a district court enjoys when weighing those factors, see 

United States v. Jeffery, 631 F.3d 669, 679 (4th Cir. 2011), we discern no abuse of 

discretion in the district court’s decision to deny Hyman a sentence reduction.
3

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 486 

To prohibit the government of the District of Columbia from using Federal 

funds to allow individuals who are not citizens of the United States 

to vote in any election, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 24, 2023 

Mr. ROY (for himself, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mrs. MILLER of Illinois, Mr. 

PALMER, Mr. POSEY, Mr. ELLZEY, Mr. CLYDE, and Mrs. GREENE of 

Georgia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To prohibit the government of the District of Columbia from 

using Federal funds to allow individuals who are not 

citizens of the United States to vote in any election, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON FEDERAL FUNDS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi5 sion of law, no Federal funds made available to the Dis6 trict of Columbia may be used to allow individuals who 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 486 IH

1 are not citizens of the United States to vote in any elec2 tion. 

3 (b) CERTIFICATION.—Upon application for, approval 

4 for, or receipt of any Federal funds, the government of 

5 the District of Columbia shall certify that the government 

6 does not permit individuals who are not citizens of the 

7 United States to vote in any election. 

8 (c) APPLICATION.—The requirements under this sec9 tion shall apply with respect to any Federal funds applied 

10 for, approved for, received by, or made available to the 

11 District of Columbia on or after the date on which this 

12 bill is introduced in the House of Representatives. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
ex10-1.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 


EXTENSION AGREEMENT



 


This Extension Agreement (this “Agreement”), dated as of June 30, 2011, is entered into by and among Robertson Health Services, Inc. (formerly NxOpinion, LLC), a Nevada corporation (“Company”) and ______________________________(“Lender”).


 


RECITALS:


 


WHEREAS, the Lender has loaned $________ to the Company evidenced by an Amended and Restated Promissory Note Agreement dated May 28, 2010 with maturity date of June 30, 2011 (“Note”); and


 


WHEREAS, the Company and Lender agree to extend the maturity date of the Note in accordance with the terms hereof.


 


AGREEMENT:


 


NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and the mutual covenants set forth in this Agreement, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 



	
  

	
1.

	
Extension of Maturity Date.  The Maturity Date under the Note is hereby extended for an additional 3 months until September 30, 2011.







 



	
  

	
2.

	
Interest.  The unpaid principal balance shall continue to accrue interest at a rate of __________.







 



	
  

	
3.

	
Full Force and Effect.  Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, the Note shall remain in full force and effect.  Except for any waivers and modifications contained herein, this Agreement shall not in any way waive or prejudice any of the rights or obligations of the Lender or the Company under the Note, under any law, in equity or otherwise, and such waivers and modifications shall not constitute a waiver or modification of any other provision of the Note nor a waiver or modification of any subsequent default or breach of any obligation of the Company or of any subsequent right of Lender.







 


 


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed and delivered this Agreement as of June 30, 2011.


 




	
Company:



Robertson Health Services Inc.


 


 


 



	 	 	Lender:	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	
[Name, Title]

	 	 	
[Name]
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

        STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                       BY
           PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
       REGARDING FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES RELATING TO EXCHANGE ACT FILINGS

                              Dated: March 11, 2004

         I, M. Peter Thomas, Chief Executive Officer of Superconductor
Technologies Inc, herby certify that, to my knowledge, that:

         1.       the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Superconductor
Technologies for the annual period ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2.       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Superconductor Technologies Inc.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Statement as of
the date first written above.

                                          /s/ M. Peter Thomas
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          M. Peter Thomas
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer

                                        1
**EXHIBIT 32**

**Certificationpursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted**

**pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Eastern American Natural Gas Trust (the “Trust”)on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, notin its individual capacity but solely as the successor trustee of the Trust,certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Trust at the dates and for the periods presented.

Theabove certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part ofthe Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.
|   | The Bank of New  York Trust Company, N.A.,      |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
|   | Trustee for  Eastern American Natural Gas Trust |
|   |                                            |
|   | By:                                             | /s/ Mike Ulrich |   |
|   | Vice President                                  |
|   | The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A.        |

 

Date:  March 16, 2007

1

----
EXHIBIT 32.1



SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION



The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany the Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended September 28, 2002 pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and shall not be deemed filed pursuant to any provision of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or any other securities law.



Each of the undersigned certifies that the foregoing Amendment No. 1 to
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Corvis Corporation.



|                     |  |                                                               |  |          |  |                                                             
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ DAVID R. HUBER   |  | /s/ LYNN D. ANDERSON                                         
|Name:                |  | David R. Huber                                                |  | Name:    |  | Lynn D. Anderson                                            
|Title:               |  | Chairman of the Board, President, and Chief Executive Officer |  | Title:   |  | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|                     |  |                                                               | 
|Company:             |  | Corvis Corporation                                            |  | Company: |  | Corvis Corporation                                          
|                     | 
|Date: March 22, 2004 |  | Date: March 18, 2004