alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3318

ECM Industries LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_5-30-2019.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 56 (Thursday, March 23, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15312]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7184]



[[Page 15312]]

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel; Advanced Medical 
Systems, Inc., Cleveland, Ohio; Correction

[Docket No. 30-16055-ML-Ren; ASLBP No. 95-707-02-ML-Ren (Source 
Material License No. 34-19089-01)]
March 17, 1995.
    In the Notice of Hearing, issued March 13, 1995, published at 60 FR 
14467, March 17, 1995, a reference is made on page 14467 to a 
Memorandum and Order, dated March 10, 1995. That date should be March 
13, 1995.

    Dated: March 17, 1995.
Marshall E. Miller,
Presiding Officer, Administrative Judge.
[FR Doc. 95-7184 Filed 3-22-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M
#### In the Interest of A.M.C.

No. 63800.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

March 8, 1994.

Steven M. Davis, Arnold, for appellant.

Theodore R. Allen, Jr., Hillsboro, for respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Parents appeal from the order of the juvenile division of the circuit court finding jurisdiction over the parents’ child A.M.C., and *146placing A.M.C. in the legal custody of the Missouri Division of Family Services.

The order of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. A written opinion would have no precedential value.

The order of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3737

JLG Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
FIRST SUPPLEMENT DATED JUNE 6, 2000 TO THE

                 CONFIDENTIAL PRIVATE PLACEMENT MEMORANDUM DATED

                                 APRIL 24, 2000

                       WASHINGTON UROLOGICAL SERVICES, LLC

                  Washington  Urological  Services,  LLC, a  Washington  limited
liability  company (the "Company"),  by this First Supplement  hereby amends and
supplements its Confidential Private Placement Memorandum of April 24, 2000 (the
"Memorandum").  Capitalized  terms  used  herein  are  defined  in the  Glossary
appearing in the Memorandum.  Persons who have subscribed for or are considering
an investment in the Units offered by the  Memorandum  should  carefully  review
this First Supplement.

Extension of the Offering

                  Pursuant to the authority  given to the Managing  Board in the
Memorandum,  the Managing Board hereby elects to extend the offering termination
date to September 28, 2000 (or earlier in the discretion of the Managing  Board,
upon the sale of all Units as provided in the Memorandum).
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Sylvester DUDLEY, Appellant.

No. WD 40084.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Sept. 6, 1988.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Nov. 1, 1988.

Application to Transfer Denied Dec. 13, 1988.

Sean D. O’Brien, Public Defender, David S. Durbin, Asst. Public Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before TURNAGE, P.J., and SHANGLER and MANFORD, JJ.

*449ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Direct appeal from a conviction of unlawful possession of a concealed firearm, in violation of § 571.020, RSMo 1986.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3






                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-11067, 333-15907, 333-17021, 333-23035,
333-37247, 333-37383, 333-41603, 333-58045, 333-68505, 333-76379, 333-76757,
333-82569, 333-84419, 333-88813, 333-88819, 333-91621 and 333-82134) and the
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-79372, 333-07241, 333-11237,
333-28449, 333-74461 and 333-79737) of General Growth Properties, Inc. of our
report dated February 6, 2001 relating to the consolidated financial statements,
which appears in the Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the
incorporation by reference of our report dated February 6, 2001 relating to the
financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Chicago, Illinois
March 13, 2003
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4604

II-VI Incorporated:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

“Made in China 2025” or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bright Horizons Family Solutions,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Elizabeth J. Boland, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                             /s/ Elizabeth J. Boland
                             -----------------------
                             Elizabeth J. Boland
                             Chief Financial Officer

November 9, 2005
Exhibit 99
                                Selected Information
                       Relating to Series 1992-1 Certificates
                            Series 1992-2 Certificates,
                            Series 1994-1 Certificates, 
                      Series 1995-1 Certificates, Series 1996-1
                    Certificates, Series 1996-2 Certificates, and
                           Series 1997-1 Certificates from 
                      January 1, 1997 through December 31, 1997
                      -------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

 

                Series 1992-1    Series 1992-2    Series 1994-1    Series 1995-1     Series 1996-1    
                6 7/8% Auto      7 3/8% Auto      Floating Rate    6.50% Auto        5.50% Auto       
                Loan Asset       Loan Asset       Loan Asset       Loan Asset        Loan Asset
                Backed           Backed           Backed           Backed            Backed
                Certificates     Certificates     Certificates     Certificates      Certificates
                ------------     ------------     ------------     -------------     -------------



<S>             <C>              <C>              <C>              <C>               <C>


Interest
Paid            $ 5,729,166.67   $  17,208,333.32 $ 59,641,480.81  $ 65,694,444.47   $ 44,033,333.38  

Servicing  
Fee Paid        $   333,333.33   $   1,633,333.33 $  9,999,999.96  $  9,999,999.96   $  8,000,000.04  


 
                    


            
                Series 1996-2    Series 1997-1
                Floating Rate    Floating Rate
                Loan Asset       Loan Asset
                Backed           Backed
                Certificates     Certificates
                ------------     ------------


Interest        
Paid            $ 56,281,633.35  $ 28,828,051.27

Servicing     
Fee Paid        $  9,600,000.00  $  4,854,166.67







</TABLE>

                                             -14-
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4908 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4908

To amend title 23, United States Code, to make eligible airport-related 
  projects and port development projects eligible for approval under 
   State environmental laws and regulations instead of the National 
       Environmental Policy Act of 1969, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 26, 2023

Mr. Garamendi introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 23, United States Code, to make eligible airport-related 
  projects and port development projects eligible for approval under 
   State environmental laws and regulations instead of the National 
       Environmental Policy Act of 1969, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Expedited Federal Permitting for 
California Act''.

SEC. 2. PROGRAM FOR ELIMINATING DUPLICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS.

    (a) In General.--Section 330 of title 23, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(1) by striking ``pilot'';
            (2) in subsection (j) by striking ``Not later than 2 years 
        after the date of enactment of this section, and annually 
        thereafter, the'' and inserting ``The'';
            (3) by striking subsection (k);
            (4) in subsection (l)--
                    (A) in paragraph (3) by striking ``pilot''; and
                    (B) in paragraph (4)--
                            (i) in subparagraph (A) by striking ``; 
                        and'' and inserting a semicolon;
                            (ii) by redesignating subparagraph (B) as 
                        subparagraph (D); and
                            (iii) by inserting after subparagraph (A) 
                        the following:
                    ``(B) an eligible airport-related project (as such 
                term is defined in section 40117(a) of title 49);
                    ``(C) an eligible port development project 
                described in section 54301(a)(3) of title 49; and''; 
                and
            (5) by redesignating subsection (l) as subsection (k).
    (b) Regulations.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall issue such 
regulations as are necessary to implement the amendments made by 
subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
#### W. M. SHERRILL v. GRAHAM COUNTY.

(Filed 20 September, 1933.)

1. Master and Servant B lb—

A contract of Lire at a stipulated hourly wage, without reference to the number of hours the employment was to continue, gives the employee no right of action for damages because he was employed a fewer number of hours than other employees engaged at the same time.

3. Evidence J a—

Parol evidence at variance with the terms of a written contract is incompetent.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Glement, J.,*at June Term, 1933, of Gba-ham.

Affirmed.

*T. M. Jenhins and B. L. Phillips for appellant.*

*Moody & Moody and Morphew & Morphew for appellee.*

Adams, J.

The board of commissioners of Graham County made an order for indexing certain records of the county according to the Oott Indexing System and agreed to employ R. 0. Sherrill as general supervisor of the work at the rate of forty cents an hour and J. B. Slaughter and the plaintiff as assistants at the rate of thirty cents. After the work had been done the plaintiff instituted this action to recover dam*179ages, alleging- that the defendant had failed and refused to keep the plaintiff employed for such time as was allotted to each of the others— that R. O. Sherrill had been engaged in the work 2,361 hours, J. B. Slaughter 1,174 hours, and the plaintiff only 641 hours, for which he had been paid. At the close of the plaintiff’s evidence the court dismissed the action as in case of nonsuit. O. S., 567.

The judgment is affirmed. The contract does not impose upon the defendant the necessity of allotting to the employees an equal number of hours for work. Moreover, we find nothing in the record showing a compliance, in reference to the plaintiff’s claim, with the County Fiscal Control Act. Public Laws, 1927, chap.. 146, sec. 15. The parol evidence offered by the plaintiff was at variance with .the written contract and was therefore incompetent. Judgment

Affirmed.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3914

Helen of Troy:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3985

Cummins Allison Corp:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
S. 409 

One Hundred Seventeenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Sunday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty one 

An Act 

To provide for the availability of amounts for customer education initiatives and 

non-awards expenses of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission Whistleblower Program, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION WHISTLEBLOWER PROGRAM. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, 

there is established in the Treasury a separate account (referred 

to in this section as the ‘‘account’’), the amounts in which shall 

be available for the sole purposes of— 

(1) carrying out the activities described in section 

23(g)(2)(B) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 

26(g)(2)(B)) (referred to in this section as ‘‘customer education 

initiatives’’); and 

(2) funding the administrative, programmatic, and personnel expenses of the Whistleblower Office and the Office 

of Customer Education and Outreach of the Commodity Futures 

Trading Commission (referred to in this section as the ‘‘Commission’’) in carrying out section 23 of the Commodity Exchange 

Act (7 U.S.C. 26) (referred to in this section as ‘‘non-awards 

expenses’’). 

(b) TRANSFERS FROM FUND INTO ACCOUNT.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Commission shall transfer up to $10,000,000 from 

the Commodity Futures Trading Commission Customer Protection Fund established under section 23(g)(1) of the Commodity 

Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 26(g)(1)) (referred to in this section 

as the ‘‘Fund’’) into the account. 

(2) AVAILABILITY.—Amounts transferred under paragraph 

(1) shall be available for obligation without further appropriation and remain available until October 1, 2022. 

(3) REMAINING AMOUNTS.—Amounts remaining in the 

account that are unobligated on October 1, 2022, shall be 

returned to the Fund. 

(c) REQUIREMENT FOR OBLIGATIONS.—The Commission may 

make obligations from the account only when the unobligated balance of the Fund is insufficient to pay non-awards expenses and 

expenses for customer education initiatives due to awards that 

the Commission has ordered under section 23(b) of the Commodity 

Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 26(b)). 

(d) REPORTS TO CONGRESS.—The Commission shall include in 

each report required under section 23(g)(5) of the Commodity 
S. 409—2 

Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 26(g)(5)) the same information with respect 

to the account as the Commission includes in the report with 

respect to the Fund, to the extent the information is relevant 

to the account. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.