alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## State of N ew York Su p reme C ou rt, A p p ellate Division Third J u dicial Dep artment Decided and Entered: July 31, 2014 D-36-14

___________________________________ In the Matter of ANTHONY P. CALISI, an Attorney.
COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS, Petitioner; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ANTHONY P. CALISI, Respondent. (Attorney Registration No. 2607299)

___________________________________ Calendar Date: June 30, 2014 Before: Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Rose, Egan Jr. and Lynch, JJ.

__________ Monica A. Duffy, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany (Alison M. Coan of counsel), for petitioner. Anthony P. Calisi, Phoenix, Arizona, respondent pro se.

__________
Per Curiam. Respondent was admitted by this Court in 1994. He was previously admitted to practice in Texas in 1978, where he maintained an office for the practice of law. By order dated February 15, 2012, the Supreme Court of Texas accepted respondent's voluntary resignation of his law license in lieu of discipline and removed his name from the roll of persons entitled to practice law in Texas. In its order, the court specifically deemed to be established pending disciplinary charges against respondent alleging neglect, failure to-2- D-36-14

communicate with clients and failure to cooperate in the disciplinary process. Significantly, it is undisputed that respondent abandoned the practice of law in Texas to the serious detriment of the clients named in the disciplinary charges. Petitioner moves for an order imposing discipline pursuant to this Court's rules (see 22 NYCRR 806.19). Respondent states in reply that he is not contesting petitioner's motion and has no intention of ever practicing law again. Respondent's Texas resignation was tantamount to a disciplinary resignation pursuant to this Court's rules (see 22 NYCRR 806.8; see also Matter of Goodhart, 56 AD3d 889, 890 [2008]). We, therefore, grant petitioner's motion and further conclude that, under the circumstances presented and in the interest of justice, respondent should be disbarred in this state (see Matter of Rothenberg, 116 AD3d 1334 [2014]). 1 Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Rose, Egan Jr. and Lynch, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that petitioner's motion is granted; and it is further ORDERED that respondent is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law of the State of New York, effective immediately; and it is further ORDERED that respondent is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; and respondent is hereby forbidden to appear as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority, or to give to another an opinion as to the law or its application, or any advice in relation thereto; and it is further

1 We additionally note that respondent is delinquent in his attorney registration requirements in this state (see Judiciary Law § 468-a).-3- D-36-14

ORDERED that respondent shall comply with the provisions of this Court's rules regulating the conduct of disbarred attorneys (see 22 NYCRR 806.9).

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court
**Exhibit 32.1**

**STATEMENTOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period endedSeptember 30, 2006 (the “Form 10-Q”) of Cardinal Financial Corporation, I,Bernard H. Clineburg, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(a)           the Form 10-Q fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and

(b)           the information contained in the Form10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financialcondition and results of operations of the Company and its subsidiaries as of,and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.

 
| Date: November 8, 2006 |   | /s/ Bernard H. Clineburg             |
|------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------|
|              |   | Bernard H. Clineburg                 |
|              |   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,2010 (the “Form 10-Q”) of Cardinal Financial Corporation (the “Company”), I,Mark A. Wendel, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, herebycertify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

(a)           the Form 10-Q fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and

 

(b)           the information contained in the Form 10-Qfairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial conditionand results of operations of the Company and its subsidiaries as of, and for,the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.

 

 
| Date:  August 6, 2010 | /s/  Mark A. Wendel                                   |
|----------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                       | Mark  A. Wendel                                       |
|                       | Executive  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-25-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-29-1996
<CASH>                                          45,279
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,009
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    117,372
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               191,514
<PP&E>                                         201,482
<DEPRECIATION>                                  87,267
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 338,294
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          128,041
<BONDS>                                        184,775
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           69,365
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (43,888)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   338,294
<SALES>                                      1,705,332
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,705,332
<CGS>                                        1,315,726
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,315,726
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               342,178
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,258
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 27,131
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,120
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,011
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,011
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   165.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   165.28
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 7 (Wednesday, January 11, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 2812]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-770]




                Sunshine Act Meetings



Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 11, 1995 / 
Sunshine Act Meetings



[[Page 2812]]

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION



``FEDERAL REGISTER'' CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: 60 F.R. 
2175.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF MEETING: 10:00 a.m., Tuesday, 
January 10, 1995.

CHANGES IN THE MEETING: The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has 
postponed the meeting to discuss Enforcement Matters until 10:00 a.m., 
Tuesday, January 17, 1995.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 254-6314.
Jean A. Webb,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 95-770 Filed 1-9-95; 11:03 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4664

Seaboard International, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 10, 2015

No. 04-15-00457-CV

IN RE E.K.C.,

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-PA-02397

Honorable Richard Garcia, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief has this date been received 

and filed in the above styled and numbered cause. Extension of time to file the Appellant’s brief 

is this date GRANTED. Time is extended to September 20, 2015.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ____________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE

CLERK OF COURT

cc: Kevin Terrill

Bexar County District Attorney's Office

Shawn Darrick Sheffield

Law Office of Shawn Sheffield
Organization Name:

Note: Representatives submitting on behalf of an organization must enter information below.

Requestor Representative:

Section 301 Investigation: China's Acts, Policies, and Practices Related to Technology 

Transfer, Intellectual Property, and Innovation - Form to Request Exclusion of Product

When submitting a product exclusion request using this form, enter the specified 

information in the following fields and explain the basis and rationale for your statements. 

By completing this form, you certify that the information provided is complete and 

correct to the best of your knowledge. 

1. Indicate whether the comment contains business confidential information (BCI), is a public

document, or is a public version of a BCI document.

3.

2. Please provide a complete and detailed description of the product of concern:

4.

5. Requestor's relationship to the product:

CONTINUED BELOW

*

10-digit HTSUS item number* for product you wish to address in this product exclusion request:

Use numerical characters only with no special characters (example: 1023456789). For help in finding

the HTSUS item number associated with your product, see https://hts.usitc.gov/

1

7.

6. Does this submission in regulations.gov include additional attachments?

Please indicate whether any additional attachment contains business confidential

information (BCI), is a public document, or is a public version of a BCI document.

VERSION 1

Requestor Information

Requestor Name (Last, First):

Public Version of BCI

See attached. 

HTS code: 8805.10.0000 Yang, Marina Zipline International Inc. Importer NON/A
END 2

8. Is this product, or a comparable product, available from sources in the United States?:

VERSION 1

11. Please provide information in support your request, taking account of the instructions

provided in Section B of the Federal Register notice (note: text entered below can extend

beyond the apparent size of this box).

9. Is this product, or a comparable product, available from sources in third countries?:

10. Please provide the value and quantity (with units) of the Chinese-origin product of concern

that you purchased for each calendar year specified. Limit this figure to the products

purchased by your firm (or by members of your trade association) alone. Please provide

estimates if precise figures are unavailable.

2016 Value:

2015 Value:

2017 Value:

2016 Quantity:

2015 Quantity:

2017 Quantity:

NONO NA NA

See attached.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4319 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4319

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of 
Veterans Affairs to regularly promote programs under chapter 31 of such 
                                 title.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 26, 2022

 Mr. Cassidy (for himself and Mr. Blumenthal) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of 
Veterans Affairs to regularly promote programs under chapter 31 of such 
                                 title.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Informing Veterans on Education for 
Transitioning Servicemembers Act of 2022'' or the ``Informing VETS Act 
of 2022''.

SEC. 2. INFORMATION CAMPAIGN REGARDING VETERAN READINESS AND EMPLOYMENT 
              PROGRAM.

    Section 3116 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(c) The Secretary shall regularly promote programs under this 
chapter by--
            ``(1) sending a letter to each veteran entitled to such a 
        program that explains the educational benefits of such 
        programs; and
            ``(2) providing a side-by-side comparison of benefits 
        between such programs and educational assistance under chapter 
        33 of this title--
                    ``(A) with each letter under paragraph (1); and
                    ``(B) on a publicly accessible website of the 
                Department.''.
                                 <all>
```
| 1.     |       | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|--------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
| 2.     |                           | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

| Date: April 14, 2011 |   | By:                     | /s/ W. Kerry Jackson |
|----------------------|--------|------------------------------|----------------------|
|                 |   | W. Kerry Jackson             |
|                 |   | Executive Vice President and |
|                 |   | Chief Financial Officer      |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-K
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH SRC FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1,000
<CASH>                                           9,924
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,405
<ALLOWANCES>                                       353
<INVENTORY>                                      2,489
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,562
<PP&E>                                           6,030
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,095
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  31,430
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,788
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            86
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,680
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    31,430
<SALES>                                         29,987
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,987
<CGS>                                           11,841
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,247
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (251)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,850)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,850)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,850)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.78)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.78)
        

</TABLE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4807

Enerpac:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
-1- 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

COURT OF APPEALS 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee, 

UNPUBLISHED 

March 7, 2017 

v No. 331306 

Crawford Circuit Court 

HENRY LEE FLAKES, LC No. 15-003898-FC 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

Before: RONAYNE KRAUSE, P.J., and O’CONNELL and METER, JJ. 

PER CURIAM. 

 Defendant appeals as of right his conviction following a jury trial of four counts of aiding 

and abetting identity theft, MCL 445.65(1)(a)(ii) and MCL 767.39. He was sentenced as a 

habitual offender, fourth offence, MCL 769.12, to a prison term of 48 months to 20 years for 

each offense, to be served concurrently. Defendant’s convictions arose out of his participation 

with Douglas Adair and Amir Jarden in a scheme to withdraw money from a bank account. 

Jarden was also convicted by a jury in a separate trial and appeals separately in Docket No. 

329148; Adair was convicted following a guilty plea that entailed his testimony at both trials, 

and he has not appealed. Defendant does not challenge his convictions on appeal, but rather only 

his sentence. We vacate his sentence and remand for resentencing. 

 As an initial matter, the prosecutor concedes that defendant is entitled to resentencing 

because notice of his sentence enhancement was not timely filed under MCL 769.13(1). The 21-

day limit is “a bright-line test for determining whether a prosecutor has filed a supplemental 

information ‘promptly,’” People v Ellis, 224 Mich App 752, 754-755; 569 NW2d 917 (1997), 

and if it is not timely filed, no enhancement is permitted. See People v Bollinger, 224 Mich App 

491; 569 NW2d 646 (1997). Because the habitual offender notice was not filed within the 21-

day period, defendant is therefore entitled to resentencing without the enhancement. 

 We recognize that defendant has properly preserved and presented a challenge to the trial 

court’s scoring of Offense Variable 10. Because we are remanding for resentencing, we decline 

to consider this argument, and no opinion thereon should be implied or construed. We deem 

defendant’s contention that he received ineffective assistance of counsel to be moot in light of 

our remand and the complete lack of any evidence that any plea discussion ever occurred. 

 
-2- 

Defendant’s sentence is vacated and the matter remanded for resentencing. We do not retain 

jurisdiction. 

/s/ Amy Ronayne Krause 

/s/ Peter D. O'Connell 

/s/ Patrick M. Meter
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4151

Scosche Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel