alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1996
<CASH>                                              20
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   80,828
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,346
<INVENTORY>                                    133,495
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               221,657
<PP&E>                                         137,987
<DEPRECIATION>                                  43,720
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 375,714
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           71,151
<BONDS>                                        196,719
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           106
<OTHER-SE>                                      99,898
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   375,714
<SALES>                                        490,655
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               490,655
<CGS>                                          411,048
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  411,048
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                41,445
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   210
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,971
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 24,191
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,459
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,732
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (609)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,123
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.33
        

</TABLE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4558

Apergy ESP Systems, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3068

Ogura Corporation: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_05.09.19.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
Exhibit 99.1



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



Board of Directors

Killbuck Bancshares, Inc.



We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Killbuck
Bancshares, Inc., Inc. and its consolidated subsidiary as of June 30, 2004, and the related consolidated statements of income for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, and the consolidated statement of changes in
stockholders equity for the six-month period ended June 30, 2004 and the consolidated statement of cash flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management.



We conducted our review in accordance with
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial
and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial
statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.



Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.



We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2003, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not
presented herein); and in our report dated January 30, 2004 we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ S.R. SNODGRASS, A.C.     
|                             
|S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.         
|626 North Fourth Street      
|Steubenville, Ohio 43952-1982
|Phone: 740-282-2771          
|Facsimile: 740-282-1606
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

I, Patrick J. Dirk, certify for purposes of 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, the QuarterlyReport of TROY Group, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period endedFebruary 29, 2004 fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that informationcontained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Troy Group, Inc.

 

 
| Date:  May 12, 2004 |                                         |
|--------------------------|----------------------------------------------|
|                     |                                         |
|                     |                                         |
|                     | By:                                          | /s/ Patrick J. Dirk |   |
|                     | Name: Patrick J. Dirk                        |
|                     | Title: President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
#### In the Matter of Copaigue Union Free School District, Appellant, v Local 852, Civil Service Employees Association, Respondent. (Matter No. 1.) In the Matter of Michael Sollecito, Respondent, v Board of Education of Copaigue Union Free School District, Appellant. (Matter No. 2.)

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 (matter No. 1) to stay arbitration, and a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to prohibit the respondent from assigning the petitioner bus duty (matter No. 2), the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cannavo, J.), entered April 7, 1989, which denied the application to stay arbitration and stayed the proceedings in matter No. 2 pending arbitration.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The petitioner Michael Sollecito, a custodial worker with the Copaigue Union Free School District (hereinafter the School District), filed a grievance with Local 852 of the Civil Service Employees Association. He alleged that the School District had assigned him to "bus duty”, which entailed directing trafile while students were exiting or boarding a school bus. After Sollecito had processed his claim through the fourth step grievance procedure set forth in the collective bargaining agreement, the School District sought to stay the fifth and final arbitration step of the agreement.

The Supreme Court denied the School District’s application to stay arbitration on the ground that the claim sought to be *530arbitrated is one which may properly be arbitrated under the collective bargaining agreement. Article 26 of the collective bargaining agreement, captioned “Grievance Procedure” states that “The Union and Employer shall make reasonable efforts to resolve all grievances and disputes. A grievance is defined as a complaint by an employee based on an alleged violation of the provisions of this contract”. Inasmuch as the School District has failed to indicate any law, rule or regulation precluding resolution of the issue by arbitration, and public policy is not offended by an arbitration award involving an interpretation of a job description which does not create or classify a new position, the issue is arbitrable *(see, Town of Brookhaven v Civil Serv. Employees Assn.,*141 AD2d 630; *Matter of Dutchess County Ch. [Dutchess County],*54 NY2d 738). Accordingly, arbitration is the appropriate means of resolving this dispute and the Supreme Court properly denied the School District’s application for a stay. Thompson, J. P., Brown, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.
#### RALEIGH BUILDING CORPORATION v. P. B. RODGERS.

(Filed 15 April, 1942.)

Subscription § 3—

Defendant’s subscription to stock in plaintiff corporation was conditioned upon the subscription by others of a stated number of shares. *Sold:*In the absence of evidence that the stated number of shares had been subscribed prior to the institution of the action, or that defendant, at the time he made payments on his subscription, had knowledge of the fact that the specified number of shares had not been subscribed, defendant’s motion for judgment as of nonsuit is properly granted.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Carr, J.,*at January Term, 1942, of Wake.

Civil action to recover upon conditional stock subscription.

Upon plaintiff resting its case motion for judgment as of nonsuit was allowed. Plaintiff appeals to Supreme Court and assigns error.

*Paul F. Smith for plaintiff, appellant.*

*Briggs & West for defendant, appellee.*

Pee Cukiam.

Upon the trial below evidence for plaintiff tended to show that the number of shares to be subscribed, upon which defendant’s subscription was conditioned, had not been subscribed either when the corporation was organized in 1931, or on the date of the institution of this action. And on argument here counsel for plaintiff states that it is not contended that defendant, when in 1931 he made six payments on his subscription, had knowledge of the fact that the total subscription for stock was less than the specified number of shares.

In the light of these facts, the judgment below is

Affirmed.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER Cause No 01-11-00703-CV;In the Interest of D.J.W., A Child

On appeal from the 313th District Court of Harris County, Texas, trial court case number 2010-04338J 

### On August 31, 2012, appellant, N.W., filed a motion for rehearing and a motion for reconsideration en banc from this Court’s August 16, 2012 opinion. The Court requests a response. It is ordered that the appellee’s response is due Tuesday, September 18, 2012. It is so ORDERED. Judge’s signature: /s/Michael Massengale

Acting individually



### Date: September 4, 2012
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

SHARIF HOOKER,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 125 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 28th day of August, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4836

Arrowhead Electrical Products, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5086 

To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to exclude from income, 

for the purpose of determining eligibility and benefits, increased income 

received from cost of living adjustments made under titles II and XVI 

of the Social Security Act, section 3(a)(1) of the Railroad Retirement 

Act of 1974 (45 U.S.C. 231b(a)(1)), or section 5312 of title 38 of 

the United States Code, and income received from supplementary payments received under section 1616 of the Social Security Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 28, 2023 

Ms. MOORE of Wisconsin (for herself, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mrs. HAYES, Ms. 

NORTON, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Ms. CLARKE of New York, Ms. 

PLASKETT, Ms. TOKUDA, Ms. SEWELL, Mr. GRIJALVA, Ms. SA ́NCHEZ, 

Mr. EVANS, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, and Mrs. BEATTY) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to exclude 

from income, for the purpose of determining eligibility 

and benefits, increased income received from cost of living adjustments made under titles II and XVI of the 

Social Security Act, section 3(a)(1) of the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974 (45 U.S.C. 231b(a)(1)), or section 

5312 of title 38 of the United States Code, and income 

received from supplementary payments received under 

section 1616 of the Social Security Act. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5086 IH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘COLAs Don’t Count 

5 Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS. 

7 Section 5(d) of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 

8 (7 U.S.C. 2014(d)) is amended— 

9 (1) is by amending paragraph (12) to read as 

10 follows: 

11 ‘‘(12) through September 30 of any fiscal year 

12 any increase in income attributable to a cost-of-liv13 ing adjustment made on or after January 1st of 

14 such fiscal year under title II or XVI of the Social 

15 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 401 et seq., 1381 et seq.), 

16 section 3(a)(1) of the Railroad Retirement Act of 

17 1974 (45 U.S.C. 231b(a)(1)), or section 5312 of 

18 title 38 of the United States Code, if the household 

19 was certified as eligible to participate in the supple20 mental nutrition assistance program or received an 

21 allotment in the month immediately preceding the 

22 first month in which the adjustment was effective;’’, 

23 (2) in paragraph (18) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

24 end, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5086 IH

1 (3) by redesignating paragraph (19) as para2 graph (20), and 

3 (4) by inserting after paragraph (18) the fol4 lowing: 

5 ‘‘(19) supplementary payments received under 

6 section 1616 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

7 1382e); and’’. 

8 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

9 This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall 

10 take effect on October 1, 2024. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-5425

Bosch Automotive Service Solutions Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
Organization Name:

Note: Representatives submitting on behalf of an organization must enter information below.

Requestor Representative:

Section 301 Investigation: China's Acts, Policies, and Practices Related to Technology 

Transfer, Intellectual Property, and Innovation - Form to Request Exclusion of Product

When submitting a product exclusion request using this form, enter the specified 

information in the following fields and explain the basis and rationale for your statements. 

By completing this form, you certify that the information provided is complete and 

correct to the best of your knowledge. 

1. Indicate whether the comment contains business confidential information (BCI), is a public

document, or is a public version of a BCI document.

3.

2. Please provide a complete and detailed description of the product of concern:

4.

5. Requestor's relationship to the product:

CONTINUED BELOW

*

10-digit HTSUS item number* for product you wish to address in this product exclusion request:

Use numerical characters only with no special characters (example: 1023456789). For help in finding 

the HTSUS item number associated with your product, see https://hts.usitc.gov/

1

7.

6. Does this submission in regulations.gov include additional attachments?

Please indicate whether any additional attachment contains business confidential

information (BCI), is a public document, or is a public version of a BCI document.

VERSION 1

Requestor Information

Requestor Name (Last, First):

Public Version of BCI

RC151, 15.7 ton Capacity, 1.00 in Stroke, General Purpose Hydraulic Cylinder; Maximum Operating 

Pressure psi: 10000; Weight Kgs: 3,3; Oil Capacity Advance cm3: 51; Stroke Ranges mm: 24 - 47

8412210075 Schmidt, Jackie Enerpac Jackie SchmidtImporter Yes Contains BCI
END 2

8. Is this product, or a comparable product, available from sources in the United States?:

VERSION 1

11. Please provide information in support your request, taking account of the instructions

provided in Section B of the Federal Register notice (note: text entered below can extend

beyond the apparent size of this box).

9. Is this product, or a comparable product, available from sources in third countries?:

10. Please provide the value and quantity (with units) of the Chinese-origin product of concern

that you purchased for each calendar year specified. Limit this figure to the products

purchased by your firm (or by members of your trade association) alone. Please provide 

estimates if precise figures are unavailable.

2016 Value:

2015 Value:

2017 Value:

2016 Quantity:

2015 Quantity:

2017 Quantity:

No No BCI BCI BCI BCI BCI BCI

See addendum for additional information.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended September 30, 2008 (the “Form 10-Q”) of CardinalFinancial Corporation (the “Company”), I, Mark A. Wendel, Executive VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

(a)           the Form 10-Qfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(b)           the information contained in the Form 10-Qfairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial conditionand results of operations of the Company and its subsidiaries as of, and for,the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.

 

 
| Date: November 8, 2008 | /s/ Mark A. Wendel                                     |
|-----------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|                        | Mark A. Wendel                                         |
|                        | Executive Vice President and Chief   Financial Officer |

 

----