alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2CERTIFICATIONI, J. Paul Withrow, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Synagro Technologies, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisannual report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b. designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonableassurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accountingprinciples;  c. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based onsuch evaluation;  d. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: March 29, 2006                  /s/ J. Paul Withrow   Chief Financial Officer and Director
EXHIBIT 32.1



                 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                    PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Diasense, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ended September 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Keith R. Keeling, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted pursuant to  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:  January 17, 2006


/s/ Keith R. Keeling

Keith R. Keeling
Chief Executive Officer
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4073

Tianhai Electric North America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7651

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ANTHONY LEE SCOTT, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-94-2, CA-98-132-3-P) Submitted: February 11, 1999 Decided: February 25, 1999 Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony Lee Scott, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant filed an untimely notice of appeal. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing notices of appeal are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods are “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Parties to civil actions have sixty days within which to file in the district court notices of appeal from judgments or final orders. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). The only exceptions to the appeal period are when the district court extends the time to appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The district court entered its order on August 12, 1998; Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed on October 30, 1998, which is beyond the sixty-day appeal period. Appellant’s failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period leavesthis court without jurisdiction to consider the merits of Appellant’s appeal. We therefore deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2782

Speck Pumps-Pool Products, Inc: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions.

pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0001060224
<NAME>                        Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollar

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         3,075
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,397
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               8,808
<PP&E>                                         546,071
<DEPRECIATION>                                 27,188
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 527,691
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          240,289
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     264,424
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   527,691
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               40,057
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  11,371
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               8,856
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             6,972
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                12,858
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            12,858
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   12,858
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .97
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .97




</TABLE>
Exhibit No.
32.1


Form
10-K


September
30, 2009


Truewest
Corporation


File
No.  33-56574








Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report of Truewest Corporation (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Glenn A. Little, Chief
Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
      October 22, 2009
              By:
              /s/
      Glenn A. LittleGlenn
      A. LittleChief
      Executive Officer andChief
      Financial Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Truewest Corporation and will be retained by Truewest Corporation and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3950

Academy, Ltd:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXHIBIT
32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification






Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of China Aoxing
Pharmaceutical Company, Inc. (the “Company”) certifies that:






1. The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended December 31,
2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and






2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




February
      15, 2009
            /s/
      Zhenjiang YueZhenjiang
      Yue, Chief Executive OfficerFebruary
      15, 2009
            /s/
      Hui ShaoHui
      Shao, Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-2249

BRANDON WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

STATE OF MARYLAND, Office of the Governor; BALTIMORE COUNTY 

OFFICE OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

Stephanie A. Gallagher, District Judge. (1:19-cv-01938-SAG)

Submitted: January 23, 2020 Decided: January 28, 2020

Before WYNN, DIAZ, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Brandon Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Karen Hess Rohrbaugh, Assistant Attorney General, 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Brandon Williams appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint raising 

several challenges to the garnishment of his wages for enforcement of a Maryland child 

support order. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s 

brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Williams’ informal brief does not challenge the bases

for the district court’s disposition, Williams has forfeited appellate review of the court’s 

order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is 

an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues 

preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

 AFFIRMED
#### Charles W. SIMMONS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 63191.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Sept. 14, 1993.

*389S. Paige Canfield, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We find no clear error and affirm by Rule 84.16(b). We further find an opinion would have no precedential value and affirm by written order. A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only.
Exhibit 10.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the (a) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-96569) pertaining to
the SBS Broadcasting SA 1992 Share Incentive Plan, SBS Broadcasting SA 1994 Share Incentive Plan, and Harry Sloan 1992 Stock Option Grant; (b) Registration Statement
(Form F-3 No. 333-13872), as amended, pertaining to the registration of common stock; and (c) Registration Statement (Form S-8
No. 333-8658) pertaining to the SBS Broadcasting SA 1992 Share Incentive Plan, SBS Broadcasting SA 1994 Share Incentive Plan, SBS Broadcasting SA Long-Term Employees'
Stock Ownership Plan, SBS Broadcasting SA 1997 Senior Management Incentive Compensation Plan and SBS Broadcasting SA Stock Option Exchange Plan of our report dated February 21, 2003, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements of SBS Broadcasting S.A. included in the Annual Report (Form 20-F/A) for the year ended December 31, 2002.

| |  |  | /s/ERNST & YOUNG ACCOUNTANTSErnst & Young Accountants
| |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------

Amsterdam,
The Netherlands
May 22, 2003

---

QuickLinks
| Date:      November 10, 2009 | By:                                        | /S/ OLIVER G. BREWER      III                                                                                     |
|------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                         | Oliver      G. Brewer, III                 |
|                         | Chief      Executive Officer and President |
|                         | (Principal      Executive Officer)         |
|                         |                                       |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
| Date:      November 10, 2009 | By:                                        | /S/ PAMELA      HIGH                                       |
|                         | Pamela      High                           |
|                         | Interim      Chief Financial Officer       |
|                         | (Principal      FinancialOfficer)          |

----
#### FRANK WELCH, Jr., v. HUSKE HARDWARE HOUSE.

(Filed 20 April, 1932.)

Appeal and Error J b — Action of trial court in setting aside verdict in liis discretion is not reviewable on appeal.

The action of the trial court in setting aside the verdict in his discretion as being against the weight of the evidence involves no question of law or legal inference and is not subject to review on appeal.

Appeal by defendant from *Finley, J.,*at September Term, 1931, of Moore.

Civil action by plaintiff, alleged landlord, to recover rent of alleged tenant.

Tbe jury answered tbe issue of tenancy in favor of tbe defendant and against tbe plaintiff.

*642On motion of tbe plaintiff, tbe court, in its discretion, set aside tbe verdict as against tbe weight of tbe evidence. Defendant appeals, assigning errors.

*U. L. Spence for plaintiff.*

*Cook & Cook for defendant.*

Stacy, C. J.

Tbe action of tbe trial court in setting aside tbe verdict as contrary to tbe weight of tbe evidence was a matter resting in bis sound discretion, which involves no question of law or legal inference, and is not subject 'to review on appeal. *Goodman v. Goodman,*201 N. C., 808, 161 S. E., 686; *Goodman v. Goodman,*201 N. C., 794, 161 S. E., 688.

Appeal dismissed.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3888

Quality Vision International, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

“Made in China 2025” or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel