14452 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 52 / Friday, March 17, 1995 / Notices

met. The denial notices were published

in the Federal Register on December 16,

1994 (59 FR 65076).

The findings show that Apollo Dye is

the parent company of Leader Dye &

Finishing. Both firms are engaged in

producing printed fabric and had

integrated production.

A late response to the Department’s

customer survey shows that a major

account reduced its business with

Apollo Dye because of increased

imports of printed dyed fabric.

Other findings show that U.S. imports

increased absolutely and relative to

domestic shipments in 1993 compared

to 1992 and in the first six months of

1994 compared to the same period in

1993. The ratio of imports to U.S.

production reached 143 percent in 1994.

Other findings show that the both

plants closed in July 1994 when all

production ceased and all workers were

laid off.

Conclusion

After careful consideration of the new

facts obtained on reopening, it is

concluded that increased imports of

articles like or directly competitive with

the printed dyed fabric produced by the

subject firms contributed importantly to

the decline in production and to the

total or partial separation of workers at

the subject firms. In accordance with the

provisions of the Trade Act of 1974, I

make the following revised

determination:

All former workers of Apollo Dye,

Paterson, New Jersey and its subsidiary,

Leader Dye & Finishing, Paterson, New Jersey

who became totally or partially separated

from employment on or after August 1, 1993

are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance

under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.

Signed at Washington, D.C., this 8th day of

March 1995.

Victor J. Trunzo,

Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment

Services, Office of Trade Adjustment

Assistance.

[FR Doc. 95–6652 Filed 3–16–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–M

[TA–W–30,505]

Cushman Industries, Inc., Hartford, CT;

Notice of Affirmative Determination

Regarding Application for

Reconsideration

On February 8, 1995, the company

requested administrative

reconsideration of the Department of

Labor’s Notice of Negative

Determination Regarding Eligibility to

Apply for Worker Adjustment

Assistance for workers at the subject

firm. The Department’s Negative

Determination was issued on January

20, 1995 and was published in the

Federal Register on February 10, 1995

(60 FR 8061).

New findings show from the company

show company imports of chucks from

China.

Conclusion

After careful review of the

application, I conclude that the claim is

of sufficient weight to justify

reconsideration of the Department of

Labor’s prior decision. The application

is, therefore, granted.

Signed at Washington, D.C., this 7th day of

March 1995.

Victor J. Trunzo,

Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment

Services, Office of Trade Adjustment

Assistance.

[FR Doc. 95–6657 Filed 3–16–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–M

[TA–W–30,730]

Lightolier Model Shop of the Genlyte

Group, Secaucus, NJ; Dismissal of

Application for Reconsideration

Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18 an

application for administrative

reconsideration was filed with the

Director of the Office of Trade

Adjustment Assistance for workers at

Lightolier Model shop of the Genlyte

Group, Secaucus, New Jersey. The

review indicated that the application

contained no new substantial

information which would bear

importantly on the Department’s

determination. Therefore, dismissal of

the application was issued.

TA–W–30,730; Lightolier Model Shop of the

Genlyte Group Secaucus, New Jersey

(March 7, 1995)

Signed at Washington, D.C. this 9th day of

March, 1995.

Victor J. Trunzo,

Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment

Services, Office of Trade Adjustment

Assistance.

[FR Doc. 95–6654 Filed 3–16–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–M

[TA–W–30,366]

H & R Blocks, Forks, WA; Notice of

Revised Determination on Reopening

On March 8, 1995, the Department, on

its own motion, reopened its

investigation for the former workers of

the subject firm.

The initial investigation resulted in a

negative determination on November

22, 1994 for workers at the subject firm.

The denial notice was published in the

Federal Register on December 16, 1994

(59 FR 65076).

The findings show that H & R Blocks

had reduced sales in 1993 compared to

1992 and all workers were laid off on

December 31, 1993. New findings show

a late response indicating that the

subject firm’s sole customer had

increased its reliance on imports in

1994 from 1993 while decreasing its

purchases from the subject firm.

Conclusion

After careful consideration of the new

facts obtained on reopening, it is

concluded that increased imports of

articles like or directly competitive with

cedar shakes and shingles produced by

the subject firm contributed importantly

to the decline in sales and to the total

or partial separation of workers at the

subject firm. In accordance with the

provisions of the Trade Act of 1974, I

make the following revised

determination:

All former workers of H & R Blocks in

Forks, Washington who became totally or

partially separated from employment on or

after September 20, 1993 are eligible to apply

for adjustment assistance under Section 223

of the Trade Act of 1974.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 8th day of

March 1995.

Victor J. Trunzo,

Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment

Services, Office of Trade Adjustment

Assistance.

[FR Doc. 95–6653 Filed 3–16–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–M

Investigations Regarding Certifications

of Eligibility to Apply for Worker

Adjustment Assistance

Petitions have been filed with the

Secretary of Labor under Section 221 (a)

of the Trade Act of 1974 (‘‘the Act’’) and

are identified in the Appendix to this

notice. Upon receipt of these petitions,

the Director of the Office of Trade

Adjustment Assistance, Employment

and Training Administration, has

instituted investigations pursuant to

Section 221 (a) of the Act.

The purpose of each of the

investigations is to determine whether

the workers are eligible to apply for

adjustment assistance under Title II,

Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations

will further relate, as appropriate, to the

determination of the date on which total

or partial separations began or

threatened to begin and the subdivision

of the firm involved.

The petitioners or any other persons

showing a substantial interest in the

subject matter of the investigations may

request a public hearing, provided such