alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, W. Glen Winchell, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Diametrics Medical,
Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. Date: May 5, 2005 /s/ W. Glen WinchellSignatureName:
    W. Glen WinchellTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4265

Scosche Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
----

----

| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                       |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | By  /s/ Kenneth Glynn                            |
|   |       Kenneth Glynn               |
|   |       President                   |
|   |       Chief Executive Officer and |
|   |       Chief Financial Officer     |
|   |                                                       |
|   | August 9, 2011                                             |

----

----
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 54 (Tuesday, March 21, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 15001]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7081]





                Sunshine Act Meetings



Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 54 / Tuesday, March 21, 1995 / 
Sunshine Act Meetings
[[Page 15001]] 




U.S. CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

TIME AND DATE: Tuesday, March 21, 1995, 10:00 a.m.

location: Room 420, East West Towers, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, 
Maryland.

status: Open to the Public.

Matter to be Considered:

Iron Powered Supplement Petition PP 94-1

    The staff will brief the Commission on options for Commission 
action on petition PP 94-1 from Douglas Ingoldby of Nutritech, Inc. 
requesting an exemption from the child-resistant packaging 
requirements for certain iron-containing dietary supplement powders.

    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (303) 504-0709.

contact person for additional information: Sadye E. Dunn, Office of the 
Secretary, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20207 (301) 504-0800.

    Dated: March 15, 1995.
 Sadye E. Dunn,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95-7081 Filed 3-17-95; 3:41 pm]

BILLING CODE 6355-01-M
#### STATE v. MACK LOCKLEAR.

(Filed 20 January, 1961.)

Appeal by defendant from *Burgwyn, Emergency Judge,*February Special Term, 1960, of RobesoN.

In a criminal prosecution on an indictment charging that defendant, on January 10, 1960, with force and arms, “feloniously, willfully and of his malice aforethought, did kill and murder Gurvis Locklear,” the jury returned a verdict of “Guilty of Murder in the first degree with a recommendation of mercy.” Thereupon, the court pronounced judgment, imposing a sentence of life imprisonment, from which defendant appealed.

*Attorney General Bruton and Assistant Attorney General Mc-Galliard for the State.*

*Britt, Campbell ■& Britt for defendant, appellant.*

Per Cueiam.

The only assignments of error, directed to the denial of defendant’s motions under G.S. 15-173 for judgment as in case of nonsuit, are without merit. Plenary evidence of defendant’s guilt supports the verdict. Indeed, defendant did not, either by brief or in oral argument, contend otherwise. Rather, he asserts his intention to move for a new trial on the basis of evidence discovered subsequent to the trial term and that the appeal was perfected in order to preserve defendant’s right to make such motion at the “next succeeding term (of superior court) following affirmance of the judgment on appeal.” *S. v. Edwards,*205 N.C. 661, 172 S.E. 399; *S. v. Casey,*201 N.C. 620, 161 S.E 81.

While defendant does not assign error in respect thereof, attention is called to the fact that the jury’s “recommendation of mercy” is not in accord with G.S. 14-17. However, since the court, by imposing a sentence of life imprisonment, treated the verdict as if the jury had recommended that “the punishment be imprisonment for life in the State’s prison,” the irregularity in the verdict has not prejudiced defendant and the court’s judgment will not be disturbed on account thereof.

No error.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-4697

PG Controls Incorporated: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  2-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Jan-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 Aug-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-2000
<CASH>                                             46,696
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     395,684
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                         5,366
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  477,746
<PP&E>                                            914,008
<DEPRECIATION>                                    312,247
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  1,150,710
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           2,057,420
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                        2,054,645
<OTHER-SE>                                     (4,732,625)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    1,150,710
<SALES>                                           164,691
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  170,265
<CGS>                                             104,425
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     104,425
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  283,208
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (217,368)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (217,368
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (217,368)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.07)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Killbuck Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Luther E. Proper, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                                                      
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Luther E. Proper                                 
|    |  | Luther E. Proper Chief Executive Officer May 12, 2004



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Killbuck Bancshares, Inc. and will be retained by Killbuck Bancshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4744

Arrowhead Electrical Products, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Roger Council, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alexander Chananau, J.), entered May 5, 1983, convicting defendant, upon his guilty plea, of two counts of sodomy in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.50) and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent indeterminate terms of imprisonment of from 7 to 14 years, unanimously affirmed.

Contrary to defendant’s contention, the court properly accepted and thereafter denied his motion to withdraw his plea. The plea herein was entered knowingly and voluntarily *(Boy*
      *294
      *kin v Alabama,*395 US 238, 242; *People v Harris,*61 NY2d 9, 17). There is no mandatory, uniform catechism to render a plea appropriate *(People v Nixon,*21 NY2d 338, 353, *cert denied sub nom. Robinson v New York,*393 US 1067). Here, after defendant acknowledged waiver of his constitutionally guaranteed rights and described the specifics of his case, the court validly accepted the plea. Nor did the court err in refusing the request at sentencing to withdraw the plea and deny Council’s motion to withdraw. The decision to deny a motion to withdraw a previously entered guilty plea rests within the sound discretion of the trial court *(People v Long,*157 AD2d 504). The record does not support defendant’s contention that the guilty plea was coerced. Nor is a generalized assertion of innocence sufficient to justify withdrawal of a plea *(People v Cannon,*150 AD2d 383).

Defendant also contends that the photo and lineup identifications should have been suppressed. The lineup procedure was not unduly suggestive *(Simmons v United States,*390 US 377; *People v Adams,*53 NY2d 241). Here, the complainant selected defendant’s photograph without any prompting by the police and those viewing the lineup were taken separately to the viewing room and then segregated from the others to prevent communication. Although contradicted by the police, even if the detective had informed the complainant that he had selected defendant’s photograph, that alone would not have presented a risk of influencing subsequent lineup identification *(see, People v Ballard,*140 AD2d 529, 530, *Iv denied*72 NY2d 954). Nor would any statement that those viewing the lineup would see the person "who did something” to the complainant render the otherwise proper lineup unduly suggestive *(see, People v Rodriguez,*64 NY2d 738, 741).

Although defendant also raises contentions regarding the *Sandoval*hearing, his voluntary plea of guilty affirmatively waived appellate review of the *Sandoval*rulings *(People v Motley,*69 NY2d 870; *People v Gilliam,*65 AD2d 533). Concur —Ross, J. P., Carro, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 57 (Friday, March 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15580]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7277]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[NV-930-1430-01; N59351]


Realty Actions; Sales, Leases; etc.: Nevada

ACTION: FLPMA Section 302 Lease Application.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice of Realty Action is hereby given indicating the 
availability of a parcel of public land for non-federal use through 
lease shall be issued. This lease would authorize a cemetery site on 
public lands administered by the Bureau of Land Management, Winnemucca 
District Office. An application for lease will be considered and 
negotiation for lease will be on a non-competitive basis. The realty 
action is being considered under the authority of the provisions of 
Section 302 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA) of 
October 21, 1976.
    The parcel is located in Humboldt County approximately five miles 
south of McDermitt, Nevada, on the following public lands:

Mount Diablo Meridian, Nevada,

T. 47 N., R. 38 E., Section 25: S\1/2\N\1/2\SE\1/4\NW\1/4\NW\1/
4\, S\1/2\SE\1/4\NW\1/4\NW\1/4\, N\1/2\N\1/2\NE\1/4\SW\1/
4\NW\1/4\, containing 10 acres.

    No other disposals for lease on the subject lands will be 
accepted due to the lack of competitive interest in the lands.
    The proposal would be authorized by a lease for a term of 20 
years. The lease could be renewed for a like period at the 
discretion of the Authorized Officer.
    The parcel has not been appraised at this time, so no rental 
determination is available. The rent will not be less than the 
appraised fair market value as determined by the Bureau of Land 
Management.

    For a period of 45 days from the date of publication of this notice 
in the Federal Register, interested parties may submit comments to the 
District Manager, 705 East Fourth Street, Winnemucca, Nevada 89445. In 
absence of adverse comments, an application for the proposed use will 
be processed in accordance with proper application procedures.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chuck Valentine, Bureau of Land 
Management, 705 E. 4th Street, Winnemucca, Nevada 89445, (702) 623-
1500.

    Dated: March 10, 1995.
Ron Wenker,
District Manager, Winnemucca.
[FR Doc. 95-7277 Filed 3-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-HC-P
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4810

ECM Industries LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_5-30-2019.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2053

Northern Tool & Equipment:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn