2716 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 11, 1995 / Proposed Rules

verification information within 30 days

of the date of application and is

determined eligible, the household must

be reinstated and receive benefits within

30 calendar days after the application

was filed or within 10 days of the date

the interview is completed or required

verification information is provided,

whichever is later. In no event shall a

subsequent period’s benefits be

provided before the end of the current

certification period.

(B) Deny the household’s

recertification application at the end of

the last month of the current

certification period. The State agency

may on a Statewide basis either require

households to submit new applications

to continue benefits or reinstate the

households without requiring new

applications if the households have

been interviewed and have provided the

required verification information within

30 days after the applications have been

denied.

(C) Deny the household’s

recertification request 30 days after

application. The State agency may on a

Statewide basis either require

households to submit new applications

to continue benefits or reinstate

households without requiring new

applications if such households have

been interviewed and have provided the

required verification within 30 days

after the applications have been denied.

(f) Expedited service. A State agency

is not required to apply the expedited

service provisions of § 273.2(i) at

recertification if the household applies

in a timely manner for recertification or

applies late but within the certification

period.

11. In § 273.21, paragraph (n)(1) is

amended by adding a sentence to the

end of the paragraph to read as follows:

§ 273.21 Monthly Reporting and

Retrospective Budgeting (MRRB).

* * * * *

(n) Suspension. * * *

(1) * * * The State agency may on a

Statewide basis either suspend the

household’s certification prospectively

for the issuance month or

retrospectively for the issuance month

corresponding to the budget month in

which the noncontinuing circumstance

occurs.

* * * * *

PART 274—ISSUANCE AND USE OF

COUPONS

12. In § 274.2:

a. Paragraphs (b)(2), (b)(3), and (b)(4)

are removed.

b. Paragraphs (b)(1), (c), (d), and (e)

are redesignated paragraphs (b), (d), (e),

and (f), respectively.

c. Two sentences are added to the end

of newly redesignated paragraph (b).

d. A new paragraph (c) is added.

The additions read as follows:

§ 274.2 Providing benefits to participants.

* * * * *

(b) * * * For households entitled to

expedited service, the State agency shall

make available to the household

coupons or an ATP card, not later than

the fifth calendar day following the date

the application was filed. Whatever

system a State agency uses to ensure

meeting this delivery standard shall be

designed to allow a reasonable

opportunity for redemption of ATPs no

later than the fifth calendar day

following the day the application was

filed.

(c) Combined allotments. For those

households which are to receive a

combined allotment, the State agency

shall provide the benefits for both

months as an aggregate (one) allotment,

or as two separate allotments made

available at the same time, in

accordance with the timeframes

specified in S273.2(i) of this chapter.

* * * * *

Dated: January 4, 1995.

Ellen Haas,

Under Secretary for Food, Nutrition, and

Consumer Services.

[FR Doc. 95–635 Filed 1–10–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410–30–U

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY

COMMISSION

16 CFR Part 1700

Proposed Requirements for ChildResistant Packaging; Packages

Containing 250 mg or More of

Naproxen: Extension of Comment

Period

AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety

Commission.

ACTION: Notice of extension of comment

period.

SUMMARY: On November 14, 1994, the

Commission issued a proposed rule

under the Poison Prevention Packaging

Act to require child-resistant packaging

for naproxen preparations containing

250 mg or more of naproxen per

package. The Commission had specified

that comments should be submitted by

January 30, 1995. After receiving a

request to extend the comment period,

the Commission has decided to do so,

and it will permit comments until

March 1, 1995.

DATES: Comments on the proposal

should be submitted not later than

March 1, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Comments should be

mailed to the Office of the Secretary,

Consumer Product Safety Commission,

Washington, DC 20207–0001, or

delivered to the Office of the Secretary,

Consumer Product Safety Commission,

room 502, 4330 East West Highway,

Bethesda, Maryland 20814, telephone

(301) 504–0800.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jacqueline Ferrante, Ph.D., Directorate

for Health Sciences, Consumer Product

Safety Commission, Washington, DC

20207; telephone (301) 504–0477 ext.

1199.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

Commission recently published in the

Federal Register proposed requirements

for special packaging (also known as

child resistant packaging) for naproxen

preparations containing 250 mg or more

of naproxen per package. 59 FR 56445.

These proposed requirements were

issued under the authority of the Poison

Prevention Packaging Act (PPPA), 15

U.S.C. 1471–1476. The PPPA authorizes

the Commission to establish standards

for the special packaging of any

household substance if (1) the degree or

nature of the hazard to children in the

availability of such substance, by reason

of its packaging, is such that special

packaging is required to protect children

from serious personal injury or serious

illness resulting from handling, using,

or ingesting such substance and (2) the

special packaging is technically feasible,

practicable, and appropriate for the

substance. 15 U.S.C. 1472(a).

The November 14, 1994, Federal

Register notice provides details

concerning toxicity, dosage, and

packaging of naproxen. The notice also

discusses findings that the PPPA

requires the Commission to make

concerning (1) the hazard to children

presented by the substances; (2) the

technical feasibility, practicability, and

appropriateness of special packaging;

and (3) the reasonableness of the

proposed standard.

The Commission received a request

from the Syntex Corporation (‘‘Syntex’’)

asking for an extension of the comment

period allowed for the proposed

requirements. Syntex and Proctor &

Gamble jointly have three years

exclusivity to manufacture and market

the only over-the-counter naproxen

product. Syntex stated that since it has

recently been acquired by Hoffmann-La

Roche, Ltd., additional time is necessary

for preparation and review of comments

by the new management. Syntex
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 11, 1995 / Proposed Rules 2717

requested a 30 day extension to the

comment period.

The Commission believes that this

extension will allow a more complete

response to the proposed requirements.

It will permit the Commission to receive

a more in depth response from a

company that has a significant interest

in the proposed rule. Granting a 30-day

extension of the comment period should

not increase the risk of young children

being poisoned by naproxen because the

two companies marketing naproxen

preparations are voluntarily using childresistant packaging.

Dated: January 6, 1995.

Sadye E. Dunn,

Secretary, Consumer Product Safety

Commission.

[FR Doc. 95–705 Filed 1–10–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6355–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[PS–72–92]

RIN 1545–AR23

Definition of Qualified Electric Vehicle,

and Recapture Rules for Qualified

Electric Vehicles, Qualified Clean-Fuel

Vehicle Property, and Qualified CleanFuel Vehicle Refueling Property;

Hearing Cancellation

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS),

Treasury.

ACTION: Cancellation of notice of public

hearing on proposed regulations.

SUMMARY: This document provides

notice of cancellation of a public

hearing on proposed regulations relating

to the definition of qualified electric

vehicle, the recapture of any credit

allowable for a qualified electric, and

the recapture of any deduction

allowable for qualified clean-fuel

vehicle property or qualified clean-fuel

vehicle refueling property.

DATES: The public hearing originally

scheduled for Thursday, January 19,

1995, beginning at 10 a.m. is cancelled.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Carol Savage of the Regulations Unit,

Assistant Chief Counsel (Corporate),

(202) 622–8452 (not a toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

subject of the public hearing is proposed

regulations under sections 30 and 179A

of the Internal Revenue Code. A notice

of proposed rulemaking and public

hearing appearing in the Federal

Register for Friday, October 14, 1994,

(59 FR 52105), announced that the

public hearing on the proposed

regulations would be held on Thursday,

January 19, 1995, beginning at 10 a.m.,

in the Internal Revenue Service

Auditorium, Seventh Floor, 7400

Corridor, Internal Revenue Service

Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue

NW., Washington, D.C.

The public hearing scheduled for

Thursday, January 19, 1995, is

cancelled.

Cynthia E. Grigsby

Chief, Regulations Unit Assistant Chief

Counsel (Corporate).

[FR Doc. 95–597 Filed 1–10–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830–01–P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[FL–049–2–5818b; FL–049–2–6132b; FL 51–

5819b; FRL–5134–1]

Approval and Promulgation of

Implementation Plans; Approval of

Revisions to Florida Regulations

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: The EPA proposes to approve

the state implementation plan (SIP)

revision submitted by the State of

Florida for the purpose of establishing

Reasonably Available Control

Technique standards for stationary

volatile organic compounds (VOC) and

nitrogen (NOX) sources and New Source

Review Standards for NOX. In the final

rules section of this Federal Register,

the EPA is approving the State’s SIP

revision as a direct final rule without

prior proposal because the Agency

views this as a noncontroversial

revision amendment and anticipates no

adverse comments. A detailed rationale

for the approval is set forth in the direct

final rule. If no adverse comments are

received in response to that direct final

rule, no further activity is contemplated

in relation to this proposed rule. If EPA

receives adverse comments, the direct

final rule will be withdrawn and all

public comments received will be

addressed in a subsequent final rule

based on this proposed rule. The EPA

will not institute a second comment

period on this document. Any parties

interested in commenting on this

document should do so at this time.

DATES: To be considered, comments

must be received by February 10, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Written comments on this

action should be addressed to Alan

Powell, at the EPA Regional Office

listed below.

Copies of the documents relative to

this action are available for public

inspection during normal business

hours at the following locations. The

interested persons wanting to examine

these documents should make an

appointment with the appropriate office

at least 24 hours before the visiting day.

Air and Radiation Docket and

Information Center (Air Docket 6102),

U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency, 401 M Street SW.,

Washington, DC 20460.

Environmental Protection Agency,

Region 4 Air Programs Branch, 345

Courtland Street, NE, Atlanta, Georgia

30365.

Florida Department of Environmental

Protection, 2600 Blair Stone Road,

Tallahassee, Florida 32399.

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan

Powell, Regulatory Planning and

Development Section, Air Programs

Branch, Air, Pesticides & Toxics

Management Division, Region 4

Environmental Protection Agency, 345

Courtland Street, NE. Atlanta, Georgia

30365. The telephone number is 404/

347–3555, extension 4209. Reference

file FL–49–5818.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For

additional information see the direct

final rule which is published in the

rules section of this Federal Register.

Dated: December 20, 1994.

Patrick M. Tobin,

Acting Regional Administrator.

[FR Doc. 95–609 Filed 1–10–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

40 CFR Part 52

[OR35–1–6188b, OR43–1–6523b, OR36–1–

6298b; FRL–5113–8]

Approval and Promulgation of State

Implementation Plans: Oregon

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: The EPA proposes to approve

the State Implementation Plan (SIP)

revision submitted by the State of

Oregon for the purpose of making

revisions to the State of Oregon’s Air

Quality Control Plan Volume 2.

Specifically, EPA is proposing to

approve the revisions to the Oregon

Administrative Rules (OAR) Chapter

340, Division 25 and revisions to Title

47 of Lane Regional Air Pollution

Authority (LRAPA). The SIP revision

was submitted by the State to satisfy

certain Federal Clean Air Act