T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T HI L AR I O G UZ MAN T R UJ I L L O, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 06- 71423 A ge nc yN o. A 029- 146- 316 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d J anua ry15, 2013 ** B e f o r e : S I L V E R M A N , B E A , an dN G U Y E N , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . H i l a r i o G uz m a n T ruj i l l o, ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of G ua t e m a l a , pe t i t i ons f

or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ order s um m ar i l y a ff i rm i ng an im m ig r a tio n ju d g e ’s ( “I J ” ) r e m o v a l o r d e r . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r8 U .S .C . § § § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew de no vo qu es t i on s of l aw , and revi ew for s ub st ant i alevi dence 

# FI LED JAN 16 2 013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS06- 71423 2 th e a g e n c y ’s f

a c tu a l f in d in g s . W

akkaryv. H

older , 55 8 F . 3d 10 49 , 10 56 (9th C i r. 20 09 ). W e r evi ew for abu se of di sc re t i on the agency’ s det erm i nat i on thatan al i en w a s c o n v ic te do f

ap a rtic u lar lys e r io u s c r im e . A rbi d v. H older , 700 F . 3d 379, 383 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 1 2 ) . We d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T he IJcorr ec t l y det erm i ned thatG uzm an T ruj i l l o’ s c on vi ct i on un der C a lif o rn iaP e n a l C o d e § 2 8 8 ( a ) is a n a g g r a v a te df e lo n yth a t r e n d e r s h im in e lig ib le f o ra s y lu m . See 8 C . F . R . § 1208. 13( c ) ( 2) ( D ) ( a l i e n w ho f i l e s a s y l um appl i c a t i on pri or t o A pri l 1, 19 97 , i s i nel i gi bl e i f c on vi ct ed of an aggravat ed fe l on y) ; U ni ted States v . B ar on-Me di na , 1 8 7 F .3 d1 1 4 4 , 1 1 4 7 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 9 9 ) ( s e c tio n 2 8 8 ( a ) is cat egori ca l l y an agg ravat ed fe l on y und er8 U . S . C . § 1 10 1(a) (43)(A )) . T he IJdi d n otabuse herdi sc re t i on w hen she det erm i ned thatG uzm an T ruj i l l o’ s c onvi c t i on i s apa rt i c ul a r l ys e r i ous c r i m e tha tr e nde r s hi m i ne l i gi bl e f or w ith h o ld in g o f

r e m o v a l. See 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 3 1 ( b ) ( 3 ) ( B ) ( ii) . T h e r e c o r dr e f le c ts tha tG uz m a n T ruj i l l o w a s s e nt e nc e d t o s t a t e pr i s on f ore nga gi ng i n s i gni f

i c ant s e x u a l c o n ta c t w ith ac h ildo f e ig h t o v e rap e r io do f

m o n th s . Se e A r b id , 700 F . 3d 379 a t384 ( pa rt i c ul a r l ys e r i ous c r i m e de t e rm i na t i ons a r e i nf orm e d byas e r i e s of f a c t or s , i nc l udi ng the na tur e a nd unde r l y i ng f a c t s of the c onvi c t i on, a nd the type of se nt ence i m po se d).06- 71423 3 S ub s tan tia l e v id e n c e s up p o rts th e I J ’s d e te rm in atio n th a t G u z m an T ru jillo di d n otes t abl i sh i ti s m ore l i kel y than n otthathe w ou l d b e t ortured i f he r eturned to G u a te m a la . See W

a kka ry , 558 F . 3d a t1067- 68. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.