alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2774

Clymene LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China. 

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification






Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Aoxing Pharmaceutical Company, Inc. (the “Company”) certifies that:




1.           The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period  ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and




2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






February 14, 2010
/s/ Zhenjiang YueZhenjiang Yue, Chief Executive OfficerFebruary 14, 2010
/s/ Bob AiBob Ai, Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN ITS REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000895648
<NAME> GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          19,630
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   74,585
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       4,063,097
<DEPRECIATION>                                 301,789
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,027,474
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      2,648,776
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          337,500
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,900
<OTHER-SE>                                     885,138
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,027,474
<SALES>                                        426,576
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               426,576
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  224,560
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,451
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             109,840
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                100,988
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            100,988
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  4,749
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    66,445
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.46
        

</TABLE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-4499

Zipline International Inc: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4108

Scosche Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4593

OMRON Management Center of America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4633

Yanfeng US Automotive Interior Systems I LLC:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 52 (Friday, March 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 14431]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6587]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket Nos. TA94-1-23-005 and TA95-1-23-001]


Eastern Shore Natural Gas Co.; Notice of Request for Conference 
on Proposed Settlement

March 13, 1995.
    Take notice that on March 1, 1995, Eastern Shore Natural Gas 
Company (Eastern Shore), pursuant to Rule 602 of the Commission's Rules 
of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.602 (1994), filed an offer of 
settlement in the captioned proceedings.
    As part of the offer, Eastern Shore requests that the Commission 
convene a settlement conference to consider the offer of settlement and 
postpone the due dates for comments and reply comments until after the 
settlement conference.
    Eastern Shore states that the offer of settlement has three 
interdependent parts. Article I provides that Eastern Shore will change 
its PGA methodology from unit-of-purchase to unit-of-sales and will 
allocate purchased gas demand costs on the basis of contract demand 
entitlements. If that change is approved, Article II provides that 
Eastern Shore will reduce its purchased gas demand base tariff rates 
immediately upon the effective date of the Commission's approval. 
Eastern Shore would not be required to make any refunds pursuant to the 
May 19, 1994 order in Docket No. TA94-1-23-000, et al., and would 
withdraw its request for rehearing of that order. Article III provides 
that Eastern Shore will apply to the Commission for a blanket 
certificate authorizing open-access transportation on its system, 
pursuant to 18 CFR Part 284, Subpart G.
    Eastern Shore states that copies of the proposed settlement and 
request for settlement conference have been served on all participants 
on the official service lists for the captioned proceedings and on 
interested state commissions who were served copies of the initial rate 
filings in these proceedings.
    Any person desiring to be heard at the conference or to comment 
upon the procedures suggested in the request for settlement conference 
to consider the offer of settlement should file a motion to intervene 
or comment with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North 
Capitol Street, NE., Washington DC 20426. All such motions or comments 
should be filed on or before March 21, 1995. Existing parties need not 
file a motion to intervene, but any person wishing to become a party 
must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with 
the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-6587 Filed 3-16-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 49 (Tuesday, March 14, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13718-13719]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6170]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP89-661-030]


Algonquin Gas Transmission Co., Notice of Changes in FERC Gas 
Tariff

March 8, 1995.
    Take notice that on March 3, 1995, Algonquin Gas Transmission 
Company [[Page 13719]] (Algonquin) submitted for filing as part of its 
FERC Gas Tariff, effective January 23, 1995, the following revised 
tariff sheets:

Fourth Revised Volume No. 1

Sub Ninth Revised Sheet No. 21
Sub Ninth Revised Sheet No. 22
Sub Sixth Revised Sheet No. 33

Original Volume No. 2

Sub Third Revised Sheet No. 401

    Algonquin states that the purpose of this filing is to replace 
tariff sheets that were accepted by the Commission effective January 1, 
1995, with tariff sheets that have an effective date of January 23, 
1995.
    On December 1, 1994, Algonquin filed the above-referenced tariff 
sheets to implement revised firm transportation rates under Rate 
Schedules AFT-2 and X-38. In that filing Algonquin requested that the 
Commission accept the tariff sheets effective January 1, 1995, to 
coincide with the commencement of service on the upstream facilities of 
Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation. In a February 3, 1995 letter 
order, the Commission accepted the tariff sheets with a January 1, 1995 
effective date, as requested by Algonquin. Due to a delay in 
construction, however, service by Columbia did not commence until 
January 23, 1995. Accordingly, Algonquin is providing to the Commission 
substitute tariff sheets that reflect the January 23, 1995 effective 
date. Except for the change in effective date, the substitute tariff 
sheets are identical to the sheets accepted by the Commission on 
February 3, 1995.
    Algonquin states that copies of its filing were mailed to all 
affected customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol 
Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 
of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedures. All such protests 
should be filed on or before March 15, 1995. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-6170 Filed 3-13-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 60 (Wednesday, March 29, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 16082]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7606]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

15 CFR Part 944

[Docket No. 950222055-5055-01]
RIN 0648-AH92


Restricting or Prohibiting Attracting Sharks by Chum or Other 
Means in the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary

AGENCY: Sanctuaries and Reserves Division (SRD), Office of Ocean and 
Coastal Resource Management (OCRM), National Ocean Service (NOS), 
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Department of 
Commerce (DOC).

ACTION: Extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's 
Sanctuaries and Reserves Division (SRD) is considering amending the 
regulations for the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary (MBNMS or 
Sanctuary) to restrict or prohibit the attracting of sharks by the use 
of chum or other means in the MBNMS. An advance notice of proposed 
rulemaking published February 28, 1995 (60 FR 10812) discusses the 
reasons SRD is considering restricting or prohibiting this activity in 
the MBNMS. A thirty day comment period was to close on March 30, 1995. 
This notice extends the comment period by fifteen days.

DATES: Comments must be received by April 14, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Comments should be sent to Elizabeth Moore, Sanctuaries and 
Reserves Division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 
1305 East West Highway, SSMC4 12th Floor, Silver Spring, Maryland, 
20910. Comments will be available for public inspection at the same 
address and at the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary office at 299 
Foam Street, Suite D, Monterey, California, 93940.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Moore at (301) 713-3141 or Aaron King at (408) 647-4257 or at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6a07080704192a030d09440b1a094405180d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="89e4ebe4e7fac9e0eeeaa7e8f9eaa7e6fbee">[email protected]</span></a>.

Federal Domestic Assistance Catalog Number 11.429 Marine Sanctuary 
Program.

    Dated: March 21, 1995.
Frank Maloney,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Ocean Services and Coastal Zone 
Management.
[FR Doc. 95-7606 Filed 3-28-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-08-M

</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

KAREN JULIAN and LINDA BERNHARD,

Appellants,

v.

MICHAEL SACCOCCIO, ASHLEY CATRON, and GOVERNMENT

EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Appellees.

No. 4D21-2897

[November 3, 2022]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, 

Martin County; Gary L. Sweet, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

432018CA000482CAAXMX.

Andrew A. Harris of Harris Appeals, P.A., Palm Beach Gardens, and 

Gray M. Camfield of the Law Office of Gray M. Camfield, Melbourne, for 

appellants.

Adam A. Duke and Richard A. Weldy of Young, Bill, Boles, Palmer, Duke 

& Thompson, P.A., Miami, for appellee GEICO.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, LEVINE and KUNTZ, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION

November 7, 2008 Revision Cause number: 01

- 1 7

- 0 0 538

- C R

Style: Martin Hernandez v. The State of Texas

Date motion filed * : December 7 , 201 7

Type of motion: Second M otion f o r Exten sion of Time to File Brief; Notice of

Appearance with attached finding of indigency

Part y filing motion: Appellant’s Newly

- Appointed Counsel Dal Ruggles

Document to be filed: Appellant’s Brief

Is appeal accelerated? No

.

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: October 9 , 201 7

Number of extensions granted: 1 Current Due D ate: Dec ember 8 , 2017

Date Requested: January 2 2 , 201 8 ( 45 days , 105 days from original)

Ordered that motion i s:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: January 22 , 201 8

.  No further extensions of time will be granted absent extraordinary

circumstances

.  Denied

 Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________

Because appellant’s new counsel was appointed on November 9, 2017, appellant’s

second extension is the first by new counsel and is granted

, but counsel is warned that

no further extensions will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances

. See

T EX

. R. A PP . P. 10.5(b)(1)(B), 38.6(d)

. Also, appellant’s notice of appearance is

construed as a motion for substitution of counsel and is granted

. See id. 6.5(d).

However, withdrawing counsel Alexander L. Calhoun is ordered to mail a copy of

the notice and this order to the pro se appellant via certified and first

- class mail and to

file a certificate of service with this Court within 10 days of the date of this order. See

id. 6.5(b), (d). The Clerk of this Court is directed to remove Alex ander L. Calhoun as

counsel and substitute Dal Ruggles as the lead counsel of record.

Judge ’ s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley

 Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: December 1 2 , 2017