alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

EXHIBIT 99.7

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Western Silver Corporation (the
Company) on Form 40-F for the period ended September 30, 2005 (the Report)
to which this certificate is an exhibit, we, Dale Corman, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, and Joseph Litnosky, Vice President, Finance of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                 
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

Date: December 22, 2005

| | */s/ Dale Corman*                                                 
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Name:  Dale Corman                                                
| | Title: Chief Executive Officer
      (principal executive officer)
| |                                                                   
| | */s/ Joseph Litnosky*                                             
| | Name:  Joseph Litnosky                                            
| | Title: Vice President, Finance
      (principal financial officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---
Ex-99.1 a)

                        REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

March 12, 1999

To the Board of Directors and Shareholder
of NationsBanc Mortgage Corporation


We have examined management's assertion about NationsBanc Mortgage Corporation's
(the "Company") compliance with the minimum servicing standards (the
"Standards") identified in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform
Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers ("USAP") as of and for the year
ended December 31, 1998 included in the accompanying management assertion,
attached hereto as Exhibit I. Management is responsible for the Company's
compliance with the Standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
management's assertion about the Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
Standards and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the
Company's compliance with the Standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that, except as indicated in Exhibit I,
the Company complied with the aforementioned Standards as of and for the year
ended December 31, 1998 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ PricewaterHouse Coopers LLP


Ex-99.1 b)

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT


Cendant Mortgage Corporation:

We have examined management's assertion about Cendant Mortgage Corporation's
(the "Company") compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified in
the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM
FOR MORTGAGE BANKERS (USAP) as of and for the year ended December 31, 1998
included in the accompanying management assertion. Management is responsible for
the Company's compliance with those standards. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance based on our
examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.


<PAGE>

Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended December
31, 1998 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche

January 29, 1999
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 497 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 497

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 1, 2023

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To eliminate the COVID-19 vaccine mandate on health care providers 
    furnishing items and services under certain Federal health care 
                               programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Freedom for Health Care Workers 
Act''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATING THE COVID-19 VACCINE MANDATE ON HEALTH CARE 
              PROVIDERS FURNISHING ITEMS AND SERVICES UNDER CERTAIN 
              FEDERAL HEALTH CARE PROGRAMS.

    The Secretary of Health and Human Services may not implement, 
enforce, or otherwise give effect to the rule entitled ``Medicare and 
Medicaid Programs; Omnibus COVID-19 Health Care Staff Vaccination'' 
published by the Department of Health and Human Services on November 5, 
2021 (86 Fed. Reg. 61555) and may not promulgate any substantially 
similar rule.

            Passed the House of Representatives January 31, 2023.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Eric F. Lundberg, certify that:1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American Lawyer
Media Holdings, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within the registrant, particularly during the period
in which this quarterly report is being prepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly
report based on such evaluation; andc) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect




---



##### 



the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. Date: May 12, 2004 /s/ ERIC F. LUNDBERGEric F. LundbergVice
President and Chief Financial Officer
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

April 12, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4549

ECM Industries LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_04.15.19.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 57 (Friday, March 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15559]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7254]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-197-001]


Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp.; Notice of Tariff Filing

March 20, 1995.
    Take notice that on March 17, 1995, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line 
Corporation (Transco) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, Substitute Second Revised Sheet No. 
3740. The proposed effective date of the revised tariff sheet is April 
1, 1995.
    On March 1, 1995 Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation 
(Transco) filed in Docket No. RP95-197-000 a change in rates pursuant 
to Section 4 of the Natural Gas Act and Part 154 of the Commission's 
regulations thereunder (March 1 Filing). As indicated in Section D (a) 
of the Statement of Nature, Reasons and Basis, Transco proposes to 
revise the right of first refusal language set forth in Section 48.2 of 
the General Terms and Conditions of Transco's Volume No. 1 Tariff to 
state that Transco will solicit bids for a minimum of 5 days and a 
maximum of 30 days following the date that the terms and conditions for 
the available capacity are posted on Transco's EBB.
    It has come to Transco's attention that Second Revised Sheet No. 
3740 included in the March 1 Filing does not reflect such revised 
language. Therefore, in order to reflect this intended revision to 
Section 48.2 of the General Terms and Conditions, Transco is submitting 
in the instant filing Substitute Second Revised Sheet No. 3740 as a 
replacement for Second Revised Sheet No. 3740.
    Transco states that copies of the instant filing are being mailed 
to those parties which were served with a copy of Transco's March 1 
Filing.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol 
Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests should be filed 
on or before March 27, 1995. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this 
filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-7254 Filed 3-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4880 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4880

      To waive sovereign immunity in certain circumstances where 
                 jurisdictions prohibit monetary bail.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 25, 2023

 Ms. Malliotakis introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To waive sovereign immunity in certain circumstances where 
                 jurisdictions prohibit monetary bail.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting All Communities Equally 
Act of 2023'' or as the ``PACE Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT OF AVAILABILITY OF CASH BAIL FOR CERTAIN OFFENDERS.

    If monetary bail has been prohibited in a State or any political 
subdivision thereof, the courts of that State shall have the 
authority--
            (1) to determine the dangerousness of individuals before 
        the courts on criminal charges; and
            (2) to hold on bail individuals who are determined to be 
        violent and/or repeat offenders.

SEC. 3. WAIVER OF SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY.

    A State or political subdivision thereof that has a prohibition on 
monetary bail waives sovereign immunity with respect to a cause of 
action against the local government by an individual for property 
damages or damages for personal injuries as a result of a dangerous 
criminal being released without monetary bail.

SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act shall take effect beginning on the date that is 30 days 
after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 58 (Monday, March 27, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15793-15794]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7484]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[NAFTA--00293 And NAFTA--00293A]


Wirekraft Industries, Inc. Mishawaka, IN; and Wirekraft 
Industries, Inc., Burcliff Industries Marion, OH; Amended Certification 
Regarding Eligibility To Apply for NAFTA Transitional Adjustment 
Assistance

    In accordance with section 250(a), subchapter D, chapter 2, title 
II, of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 USC 2273), the Department 
of Labor issued a Certification for NAFTA Transitional Adjustment 
Assistance on December 29, 1994, applicable to all workers of the 
subject firm.
    The Department, on its own motion, reviewed the certification for 
workers of the subject firm. New findings show that Wirekraft workers 
in Marion, Ohio also [[Page 15794]] produce wire harnesses and had 
decreased sales and production and employment declines in the relevant 
period.
    Other findings show that a major customer of Wirekraft is importing 
wire harnesses from Mexico in the relevant period.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers who were adversely affected by increased imports.
    Accordingly, the Department is amending the Mishawaka, Indiana 
certification to include workers at Marion, Ohio.
    The amended notice applicable to NAFTA--00293 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of the Wirekraft Industries, Inc., Mishawaka, 
Indiana and Wirekraft Industries' Burcliff Industries in Marion, 
Ohio who became totally or partially separated from employment on or 
after December 8, 1993 are eligible to apply for NAFTA-TAA under 
section 250 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 17th day of March 1995.
Victor J. Trunzo,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 95-7484 Filed 3-24-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2919

National Presto Industries, Inc.:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_05.09.19.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 57 (Friday, March 24, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 15520-15521]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7232]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 15521]]

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

50 CFR Part 672

[Docket No. 950206041-5041-01; I.D. 032095A]


Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska; Pacific Cod for Processing by 
the Inshore Component in the Central Regulatory Area

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Closure.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS is closing the directed fishery for Pacific cod by 
vessels catching Pacific cod for processing by the inshore component in 
the Central Regulatory Area of the Gulf of Alaska (GOA). This action is 
necessary to prevent exceeding the allocation of Pacific cod for the 
inshore component in this area.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 12 noon, Alaska local time (A.l.t.), March 22, 1995, 
until 12 midnight, A.l.t., December 31, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew N. Smoker, 907-586-7228.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The groundfish fishery in the GOA exclusive 
economic zone is managed by NMFS according to the Fishery Management 
Plan for Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska (FMP) prepared by the North 
Pacific Fishery Management Council under authority of the Magnuson 
Fishery Conservation and Management Act. Fishing by U.S. vessels is 
governed by regulations implementing the FMP at 50 CFR parts 620 and 
672.
    In accordance with Sec. 672.20(c)(1)(ii)(B), the allocation of 
Pacific cod for the inshore component in the Central Regulatory Area 
was established by the final 1995 groundfish specifications (60 FR 
8470, February 14, 1995) as 41,085 metric tons (mt).
    The Director, Alaska Region, NMFS (Regional Director), has 
determined, in accordance with Sec. 672.20(c)(2)(ii), that the 
allocation of Pacific cod total allowable catch for the inshore 
component in the Central Regulatory Area soon will be reached. The 
Regional Director established a directed fishing allowance of 38,085 
mt, with consideration that 3,000 mt will be taken as incidental catch 
in directed fishing for other species in the Central Regulatory Area. 
The Regional Director has determined that the directed fishing 
allowance has been reached. Consequently, NMFS is prohibiting directed 
fishing for Pacific cod by operators of vessels catching Pacific cod 
for processing by the inshore component in the Central Regulatory Area.
    Directed fishing standards for applicable gear types may be found 
in the regulations at Sec. 672.20(g).

Classification

    This action is taken under 50 CFR 672.20 and is exempt from review 
under E.O. 12866.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: March 20, 1995.
David S. Crestin,
Acting Director, Office of Fisheries Conservation and Management, 
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 95-7232 Filed 3-20-95; 4:43 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3458

Yaesu USA Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn