alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 58 (Monday, March 27, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15747]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7489]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Agency Form Under Review by the Office of Management and Budget

    DOC has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for 
clearance the following proposal for collection of information under 
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
    Agency: Bureau of the Census.
    Title: 1995 Census Test - Coverage Study.
    Form Number(s): DG-1300.
    Agency Approval Number: None.
    Type of Request: New collection.
    Burden: 160 hours.
    Number of Respondents: 960.
    Avg Hours Per Response: 10 minutes.
    Needs and Uses: The Census Bureau is testing many new methods 
during the 1995 Census Test to enhance coverage and contain costs for 
the Year 2000 Decennial Census. Four of those new methods are the ``Be 
counted'' forms, refined rostering questions, the use of administrative 
records to improve coverage (simulated use only; administrative records 
will not be used to add persons to the census test count), and the use 
of automated matching and unduplication software. In order to evaluate 
these methods, the Census Bureau plans to conduct a Coverage Study in 
two of the three 1995 Census Test sites -- Oakland, CA and Paterson, 
NJ. The Coverage Study is designed to measure the degree to which each 
method introduced or, in the case of administrative records, may 
introduce erroneous enumerations (EEs) into census test counts and to 
determine the demographic characteristics of the EEs. Enumerators will 
visit a sample of households to verify residency status and to collect 
demographic characteristics about persons that were either added or 
deleted from census test counts by means of one of the above methods.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Frequency: One time only.
    Respondent's Obligation: Mandatory.
    OMB Desk Officer: Maria Gonzalez, (202) 395-7313.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Gerald Tache, DOC Forms Clearance Officer, (202) 
482-3271, Department of Commerce, room 5312, 14th and Constitution 
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Maria Gonzalez, OMB Desk Officer, room 
10201, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.

    Dated: March 21, 1995.
Gerald Tache,
Departmental Forms Clearance Officer, Office of Management and 
Organization.
[FR Doc. 95-7489 Filed 3-24-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-07-F
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-4568

Zipline International Inc: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, James W. Klingler certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-Q of Troy Group, Inc.;

 

2.             Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

(a)           designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)           evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)           disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

 

(a)           allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b)           anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 
| Date:  October 10, 2003 |   /s/James W. Klingler                                |   |
|------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                         | James W. Klingler                                               |
|                         | Vice  President-Finance, Treasurer and  Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
#### Paul Andrew WINSHIP, Petitioner, v. Jill S. GARGIULO, Respondent.

No. C-7893.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Nov. 23, 1988.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 4, 1989.

David M. Ward, Wilson, Grosenheider & Burns, Austin, for petitioner.

Russell H. McMains and Kimberley Hall Seger, McMains & Constant, Corpus Christi, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to the Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Civil Relief Act, Paul Winship is seeking to set aside a default judgment taken in a personal injury case. *See*50 U.S.C.App. § 520 (1982). The trial court ruled that it was without jurisdiction to consider the motion, and that if it did have jurisdiction, Winship had failed to show that his military service prejudiced his ability to make a defense to the claim asserted against him. The court of appeals affirmed. 754 S.W.2d 360. We deny Winship’s application for writ of error.

In denying the writ, however, we note our disapproval of the court of appeals’ characterization of this motion. The court of appeals attempted to classify this action as either a motion for new trial or a bill of review. It is neither. The statute clearly creates a distinct right for which relief may be sought. *See Commercial Credit Corp. v. Smith,*143 Tex. 612, 187 S.W.2d 363 (1945); *Arenstein v. Jencks,*179 S.W.2d 831 (Tex.Civ.App.—San Antonio 1944, writ dism’d w.o.j.); 10 C. Wright, A. Miller, & M. Kane, *Federal Practice and Procedure*§ 2692 (1983). There is no reason that this federally created procedure should be required to fit within one of our state’s existing procedures for vacating a default judgment. The application for writ of error is denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 59 (Tuesday, March 28, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 15872]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7512]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
21 CFR Part 886

[Docket No. 94M-0260]


Medical Devices; Exemptions From Premarket Notification for 
Certain Classified Devices; Correction

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a final 
rule that appeared in the Federal Register of December 7, 1994 (59 FR 
63005). The document exempted 148 generic types of class I devices from 
the requirement of premarket notification, with limitations. The 
document was published with an error in the codified section. This 
document corrects that error.
EFFECTIVE DATE: January 6, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph M. Sheehan, Center for Devices 
and Radiological Health (HFZ-84), Food and Drug Administration, 2094 
Gaither Rd., Rockville, MD 20850, 301-594-4765, ext. 157.
    In FR Doc. 94-30025, appearing on page 63005 in the Federal 
Register of Wednesday, December 7, 1994, the following correction is 
made:


Sec.  886.4350  [Corrected]

    On page 63013, in the third column, in Sec. 886.4350, paragraph (b) 
is corrected by removing the words ``only when the device meets the 
ANSI standard on optic radiation limits.''

    Dated: March 17, 1995.
William B. Schultz,
Deputy Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 95-7512 Filed 3-27-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
***EXHIBIT 32***

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the report on Form 10-QSB of SunVesta, Inc. for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“Report”), I, Thomas Meier, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

|   | (1) | This Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in this Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the small business issuer at the end of the period covered by this Report and results of operations of the small business issuer for the period covered by this Report. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Thomas Meier

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

November 12, 2007

 

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the small business issuer for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the small business issuer and will be retained by the small business issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

 

 

26
EXHIBIT
32.1

Certification
of Principal Executive OfficerPursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Dean M.
Leavitt,  Chief Executive Officer of U.S. Wireless Data, Inc.,  hereby certify,  to my
knowledge,  that the annual report on  Form 10-KSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 of
U.S.  Wireless Data,  Inc. (the "Form 10-KSB") fully complies with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
information  contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents,  in  all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of U.S. Wireless Data, Inc.

Dated: October
14, 2003

| | /s/
Dean M. Leavitt
Dean M. Leavitt
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
Mabuchi Motor America Corp.

Motor Model RS380 and RS385

View #1

View #2

View #3

# image1.png

# image2.png

# image3.png
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

November 3, 2010

p1027

Order 

November 3, 2010

141469

TIMOTHY J. WHITE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 141469

COA: 291144

Jackson CC: 08-003665-NF

PROGRESSIVE MICHIGAN INSURANCE

COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

BRIAN SCOTT WILLIAMS,

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 15, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6266
EDSON FURTADO, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CORNELIUS J. VAUGHEYS, Judge; STATE OF MARYLAND, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:07-cv03251-RWT) Submitted: April 24, 2008 Decided: April 30, 2008 Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edson Furtado, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Edson Furtado appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Furtado’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Furtado v. Vaugheys , No. 8:07-cv-03251-RWT (D. Md. Jan. 31, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# Supreme Court of Florida

____________ No. SC17

- 726

____________ DANIEL BURNS, JR., Appellant,

vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. [ January 23, 2018 ]

PER CURIAM.
We have for review Daniel Burns, Jr.’s appeal of the circu it court’s order denying Burns’ motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851. This Court has jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const.
Burns’ motion sought relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court’s
decision in Hurst v. Florida , 136 S. Ct. 616 (2016), and our decision on remand in
Hurst v. State ( Hurst ), 202 So. 3d 40 (Fla. 2016), cert. denied , 137 S. Ct. 2161 (2017). This Court stayed Burns’ appeal pending the disposit ion of Hitchcock v.
State , 226 So. 3d 216 (Fla. 2017), cert. denied , 138 S. Ct. 513 (2017) . After this- 2

-

Court decided Hitchcock , Burns responded to this Court’s order to show cause arguing why Hitchcock should not be dispositive in this case.
After reviewi ng Burns’ response to the order to show cause, as well as the State’s arguments in reply, we conclude that Burns is not entitled to relief. Burns was sentenced to death following a jury’s unanimous recommendation for death.
Burns v. State , 699 So. 2d 646 , 652 (Fla. 1997). Burns’ sentence of death became
final in 199 8

. Burns v. Florida , 522 U.S. 1121 (1998). Thus, Hurst does not apply retroactively to Burns’ sentence of death. See Hitchcock , 226 So. 3d at 217. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Burns’ motion. The Court having carefully considered all arguments raised by Burns , we caution that any rehearing motion containing reargument will be stricken. It is so
ordered. LABARGA, C.J., and POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur. PARIENTE, J., concurs i n result with an opinion. LEWIS and CANADY, JJ., concur in result. QUINCE, J., recused. PARIENTE, J., concurring in result. I concur in result because I recognize that this Court’s opinion in Hitchcock
v. State , 226 So. 3d 216 (Fla. 2017), cert. denied , 1 38 S. Ct. 513 (2017) , is now final. However, I continue to adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting opinion in Hitchcock

.- 3

-

An Appeal from the Circuit Court in and for Manatee County, Diana Lee Moreland , Judge

- Case No. 411987CF002014CFAXMA
James Vigianno, Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Mark S. Gruber , and Julie A. Morley, Assistant Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Temple Terrace, Florida, for Appel lant Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Lisa Martin, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, Florida, for Appellee
EXHIBIT 32.1
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Payless ShoeSource, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending April 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven J. Douglass, Chairman of the Board and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date: June 8, 2005    /s/ Steven J. Douglass Steven J. Douglass Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 6 (Tuesday, January 10, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 2625]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-675]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION


Farm Credit Administration Board; Regular Meeting

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Government in the 
Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3)), of the forthcoming regular meeting 
of the Farm Credit Administration Board (Board).

DATE AND TIME: The regular meeting of the Board will be held at the 
offices of the Farm Credit Administration in McLean, Virginia, on 
January 12, 1995, from 2:00 p.m. until such time as the Board concludes 
its business.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Floyd Fithian, Acting Secretary to the 
Farm Credit Administration Board, (703) 883-4025, TDD (703) 883-4444.

ADDRESSES: Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, 
Virginia 22102-5090.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This meeting of the Board will be open to 
the public (limited space available). In order to increase the 
accessibility to Board meetings, persons requiring assistance should 
make arrangements in advance. The matters to be considered at the 
meeting are:

Open Session

A. Approval of Minutes

B. Reports

1. COO's First Quarter FY 1995 Report:
    a. Derivatives Workgroup Report
    b. Capital Workgroup Report
    c. Cash Management Policy

    Dated: January 5, 1995.
Floyd Fithian,
Acting Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.
[FR Doc. 95-675 Filed 1-6-95; 2:25 pm]
BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THOR
VENTURES CORP., INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT JUNE 30, 2000, UNAUDITED AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10Q.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             931
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,166
<PP&E>                                           2,663
<DEPRECIATION>                                     700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,129
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          194,090
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        59,170
<OTHER-SE>                                   (247,131)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,129
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               110,971
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (110,971)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (110,971)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (110,971)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)


</TABLE>