alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with Spectrum Group International, Inc.'s (the “Company”) annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








Date:  September 23, 2011/s/ Paul SothName:  Paul SothTitle:    Chief Financial Officer & Executive VicePresident





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4600

Apergy ESP Systems, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 56 (Thursday, March 23, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15286]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7089]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army


Army Science Board; Notice of Closed Meeting

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (P.L. 92-463), announcement is made of the following 
Committee Meeting:

    Name of Committee: Army Science Board (ASB).
    Date of Meeting: 27 & 28 April 1995.
    Time of Meeting: 0900-1600, 27 April 1995. 0900-1500, 28 April 
1995.
    Place: Pentagon--Washington, DC.
    Agenda: The Army Science Board's 1994 Summer Study on 
``Technical Architecture C4I'' will meet for discussions on ASB 
business. These meetings will be closed to the public in accordance 
with Section 552b(c) of Title 5, U.S.C., specifically subparagraph 
(4) thereof, and Title 5, U.S.C., Appendix 2, subsection 10(d). The 
proprietary matters to be discussed are so inextricably intertwined 
so as to preclude opening any portion of these meetings. The ASB 
Administration Officer, Sally Warner, may be contacted for further 
information at (703) 695-0781.
Sally A. Warner,
Administrative Officer, Army Science Board.
[FR Doc. 95-7089 Filed 3-22-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
Exhibit 10.14
 FOURTH AMENDMENT
TO
LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT
 FOURTH AMENDMENT
 Recitals
 A.
 B.
 C.
 D.
 Agreement
 Now, Therefore
,
 1. Definitions.
 2. Amendments to Loan Agreement.
 2.1 Section 17 (Term and Termination).




---



##### 



3. Limitation of Amendments.
 3.1 Section 2
 3.2
 4. Representations and Warranties.
 4.1
 4.2
 4.3
 4.4
 4.5
 4.6




---



##### 



4.7
 5 Integration.
 6. Counterparts.
 7. Effectiveness.




---



##### 



In Witness Whereof,
 BANK
    
    
    
    BORROWERSilicon Valley Bank
    
    
    
    Superconductor Technologies, Inc.By:
    
    /s/  Ben Fargo
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Jeffrey QuiramName:
    
    Ben Fargo
    
    
    
    
    
    Name:
    
    Jeffrey QuiramTitle:
    
    VP/Relationship Manager
    
    
    
    
    
    Title:
    
    President and CEO




---



##### 



Schedule 1
 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENT
AND REAFFIRMATION OF GUARANTY
 Section 1.
 Section 2.
 Section 3.
  GUARANTOR
    Conductus, Inc.By:
    /s/ Jeffrey QuiramName:
    Jeffrey QuiramTitle:
    President and CEO
Consent letter of Ryder Scott Company, L.P.



 Exhibit 10.1 

 

 

 June 27, 2011 
 Dr. Juan José Suárez Coppel 
 Director General 

Petróleos Mexicanos 
 Avenida Marina
Nacional No. 329 
 Colonia Petróleos Mexicanos, 
 Torre Ejecutiva, Piso 41 
 11311 Mexico, D.F. México 

Dear Dr. Suarez Coppel: 

We hereby consent to the references to Ryder Scott Company L.P. as set forth under the heading “Exploration and Production
(Reserves)” in the annual report on Form 20-F of Petróleos Mexicanos for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Form 20-F”) and to the filing as an exhibit to the Form 20-F our report describing our review of the estimates
of proved oil, condensate, natural gas and oil equivalent reserves owned by the United Mexican States (“Mexico”) as of January 1, 2011, for 276 fields located onshore in and offshore from Mexico in the Northern Region. These estimates
were prepared in accordance with the applicable reserves definitions of Rule 4-10(a) of Regulation S-X of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. 

 

	
	/s/ Ryder Scott Company, L.P.
	
	RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.
	TBPE Firm Registration No. F-1580


  

							
	1015 4TH STREET, S.W., SUITE 600	 	CALGARY, ALBERTA T2R 1J4	 	    TEL (403) 262-2799	 	    FAX (403) 262-2790
	621 17TH STREET, SUITE 1550	 	DENVER, COLORADO 80293-1501	 	    TEL (303) 623-9147	 	    FAX (303) 623-4258
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

RUFUS YOUNG,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-3116

[February 20, 2020]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Michael A. Usan, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 05-739 CF10A.

Rufus Young, Indiantown, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, MAY and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-2917

National Presto Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4840

Enerpac:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 26, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-4289

Valmet, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 58 (Monday, March 27, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15765]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7378]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

Security for the Protection of the Public Financial 
Responsibility to Meet Liability Incurred for Death or Injury to 
Passengers or Other Persons on Voyages; Notice of Issuance of 
Certificate (Casualty)

    Notice is hereby given that the following have been issued a 
Certificate of Financial Responsibility to Meet Liability Incurred for 
Death or Injury to Passengers or Other Persons on Voyages pursuant to 
the provisions of Section 2, Public Law 89-777 (46 U.S.C. 817(d)) and 
the Federal Maritime Commission's implementing regulations at 46 CFR 
part 540, as amended:

Radisson Seven Seas Cruises, Inc., Seven Seas Enterprise, Inc. and 
Seven Seas Nassau Limited, 600 Corporate Drive, Fort Lauderdale, 
Florida 33334

Vessel: SONG OF FLOWER

    Dated: March 21, 1995.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-7378 Filed 3-24-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

869 KA 12-01954 PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V ORDER
HARLEY D. DUBOIS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

WYOMING COUNTY-ATTICA LEGAL AID BUREAU, WARSAW (LEAH R. NOWOTARSKI OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
DONALD G. O’GEEN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, WARSAW (VINCENT A. HEMMING OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Wyoming County Court (Mark H. Dadd, J.), rendered July 26, 2012. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of burglary in the second degree (two counts), grand larceny in the fourth degree (two counts), criminal mischief in the third degree and endangering the welfare of a child.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Entered: September 27, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3707

SPM Flow Control, Inc. DBA Weir SPM:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Exhibit32


CERTIFICATION
 OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT
 TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
 connection with the report on Form 10-Q ofSunVesta,
 Inc. for thequarterly
 period endedSeptember
 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
 on the date hereof, I,Josef Mettler, do hereby certify,
 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
 knowledge and belief:

| | (1) | Thisreport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in this report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the registrant at the end of the period covered by this report and results of operations of the registrant
for the period covered by this report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:November
 16, 2009





/s/
 Josef Mettler

Josef
 Mettler

Chief
 Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



Thiscertification
 accompanies this report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
 except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the
 registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this report),
 irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.   A signed original of this written
 statement required by §906 has been provided to the registrant
 and will be retained by the registrant
 and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



28
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5151 

To require responsiveness testing of Defense Logistics Agency pharmaceutical 

contracts. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 4, 2023 

Mr. NEGUSE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To require responsiveness testing of Defense Logistics 

Agency pharmaceutical contracts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Further Strengthening 

5 Supply Chains for Servicemembers and Security Act of 

6 2023’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5151 IH

1 SEC. 2. RESPONSIVENESS TESTING OF DEFENSE LOGISTICS 

2 AGENCY PHARMACEUTICAL CONTRACTS. 

3 The Director of the Defense Logistics Agency shall 

4 modify Defense Logistics Agency Instructions 5025.03 

5 and 3110.01— 

6 (1) to require Defense Logistics Agency Troop 

7 Support to coordinate annually with customers in 

8 the military departments to conduct responsiveness 

9 testing of the Defense Logistics Agency’s contin10 gency contracts for pharmaceuticals; and 

11 (2) to include the results of that testing, as re12 ported by customers in the military departments, in 

13 the annual reports of the Warstopper Program. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 56 (Thursday, March 23, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15306]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7174]



[[Page 15306]]

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993; Corporation for Open Systems International

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 28, 1994, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. Sec. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the Corporation for 
Open Systems International (``COS'') has filed written notification 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the 
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, the changes are as follows: (1) Electric 
Power Research Institute ceased membership in COS effective July 24, 
1994; (2) The BONDING Consortium, Portsmouth, RI, has entered into an 
Agreement with COS under which COS will develop an interoperability 
testing program for communications equipment implementing Bandwidth on 
Demand (``BONDING'') specifications; (3) the following organizations 
became Associates of COS's SONET Interoperability Forum (the ``Forum'') 
on the dates indicated: Alcatel Network Systems, Richardson, TX, on 
June 30, 1994; Pacific Bell, San Ramon, CA, on August 1, 1994; Reliance 
Electric, Phoenix, AZ, on June 30, 1994; and Retix, Santa Monica, CA, 
on August 1, 1994; (4) Wind River Systems, Inc., Alameda, CA, became an 
Auditing Member of the Forum on June 30, 1994; (5) The following 
organizations became Patrons of the ISDN Solutions `94 project of COS's 
ISDN Executive Council, on the dates indicated; diehl isdn GmbH, 
Leonberg, GERMANY, on July 8, 1994; Intel Corporation, Schaumburg, IL, 
on July 5, 1994; and Pacific Bell, San Ramon, CA, on June 30, 1994; (6) 
Shure Brothers Incorporated, Evanston, IL became an Observer of COS's 
Video Teleconferencing Executive Interest Group on July 15, 1994.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activities of COS. Membership in COS remains open, and COS intends to 
file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in 
membership.
    On May 14, 1986, COS filed its original notification pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice 
in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on June 11, 
1986, (51 FR 21260).
    The last notification was filed by the Department on June 13, 1994. 
A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) 
of the Act on October 27, 1994 (59 FR 54011).
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 95-7174 Filed 3-22-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT DAVID RAY BAYS, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-1203 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) 

### ) Opinion filed March 21, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; Philippe Matthey, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Richard P. Albertine, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, CRENSHAW, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.