alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of operations found
in the Company's Form 10-QSB for the year to date, and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         385,339
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  531,811
<ALLOWANCES>                                    80,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               837,600
<PP&E>                                         274,164
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,304
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,099,460
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          439,379
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,250
<OTHER-SE>                                     674,831
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,099,460
<SALES>                                        736,414
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               736,414
<CGS>                                          448,117
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  577,774
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                71,221
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                156,640
<INCOME-TAX>                                    84,326
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             74,314
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    74,314
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0




</TABLE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3134

Sowa Tool & Machine Co. Ltd:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3410

Enerpac:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
**Exhibit 32.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the AnnualReport on Form 10-K of Da-Lite Screen Company, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jerry C. Young, as ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company. 

Date: February 22, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          13,289
<SECURITIES>                                    14,716
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,774
<ALLOWANCES>                                       557
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                40,716
<PP&E>                                           4,666
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,874
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  43,534
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,225
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           108
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,457
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    43,534
<SALES>                                         23,935
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,935
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,902
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,785
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   5
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    100
<INCOME-TAX>                                       300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (200)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (200)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 54 (Tuesday, March 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 14978]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6874]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Documents Containing Reporting or Recordkeeping Requirements: 
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Review

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Notice of the Office of Management and Budget review of 
information collection.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has recently submitted 
to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review the following 
proposal for the collection of information under the provisions of the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

    1. Type of submission, (new, revision, or extension): Extension.
    2. The title of the information collection: Request for Records.
    3. The form number if applicable: NRC Form 57.
    4. How often the collection is required: On occasion.
    5. Who will be required or asked to report: Individuals requesting 
Public Document Room (PDR) documents.
    6. An estimate of the number of annual responses: 45,000 per year.
    7. An estimate of the total number of hours to complete the 
requirement or request: 750 hours annually (45,000 forms  x  .01666 hr/
form) or about 1 minute per individual.
    8. An indication of whether Section 3504(h), Pub. L. 96-511 
applies: Not applicable.
    9. Abstract: This form is utilized by individual members of the 
public to request publicly available documents in NRC's Headquarters 
Public Document Room (PDR). The form serves as a suspense slip on the 
shelf when the document is charged out.
    Copies of the submittal may be inspected or obtained for a fee from 
the NRC Public Document Room, 2120 L Street, NW., (Lower Level), 
Washington, DC.
    Comments and questions can be directed by mail to the OMB reviewer: 
Troy Hillier, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (3150-0063), 
NEOB-10202, Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC 20503.
    Comments can also be communicated by telephone at (202) 395-3084.
    The NRC Clearance Officer is Brenda Jo. Shelton, (301) 415-7233.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 14th day of March, 1995.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Gerald F. Granford,
Designated Senior Official for Information Resources Management.
[FR Doc. 95-6874 Filed 3-20-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Hughie NAYLOR, Defendant/Appellant.

No. 67128.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Aug. 22, 1995.

Robert E. Steele, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., David G. Brown, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and WHITE, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from his conviction by a jury for first degree robbery, § 569.020, RSMol994. He was sentenced in accord with the jury’s assessment verdict to ten years’ imprisonment. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
#### Keith WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 68731.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

June 11, 1996.

Dave Hemingway, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for Appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Becky Owenson Kilpatrick, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for Respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and GRIMM, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 13, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3736

Omega Environmental Technologies, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4390 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4390

    To require summary approval information with respect to certain 
                approved drugs and biological products.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 14, 2022

 Mr. Hickenlooper introduced the following bill; which was read twice 
and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To require summary approval information with respect to certain 
                approved drugs and biological products.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Accelerated Approval Transparency 
Act''.

SEC. 2. SUMMARY APPROVAL INFORMATION.

    With respect to each new drug application for a new molecular 
entity approved under section 505(c) of the Federal Food, Drug, and 
Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(c)) or biological product licensed under 
section 351(a) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262(a)) 
pursuant to accelerated approval under section 506(c) of the Federal 
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 356(c)), the Secretary of 
Health and Human Services shall provide for the drug or biologic action 
package a summary of the basis for approval, including, as relates to 
such new molecular entity, whether an advisory committee meeting was 
held and a rationale for a determination by the Secretary that a 
surrogate endpoint is reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 61 (Thursday, March 30, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 16504]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7804]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
production Act of 1993--High Performance Composites Cooperative 
Arrangement

    Notice is hereby given that, on December 20, 1994, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), BDM Federal, Inc., acting 
on behalf of the High Performance Composites Cooperative Arrangement 
(``HPC''), has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing additions 
to its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, the additional members are Hexcel Corporation, 
Pleasanton, CA; and the University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the HPC. Membership remains open, and the HPC intends to 
file additional written notification disclosing all changes in 
membership.
    On April 6, 1994, BDM Federal, Inc., acting on behalf of the HPC, 
filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. 
The Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register 
pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on June 3, 1994 (59 FR 28899).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on November 17, 
1995. This notice has not yet been published in the Federal Register 
pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act.
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 95-7804 Filed 3-29-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 58 (Monday, March 27, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15758-15759]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7409]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-207-000]


Equitrans, Inc.; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

March 21, 1995.
    Take notice that on March 17, 1995, Equitrans, Inc. (Equitran), 
tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following proposed tariff sheet, with a 
proposed effective date of April 15, 1994:

Original Sheet No. 9A

    Equitrans states that the purpose of the filing is to flow through 
to its former bundled sales customers the refunds [[Page 15759]] which 
Equitrans has received from upstream pipelines and suppliers for gas 
purchase and transportation activity which occurred prior to its 
implementation of Order No. 636. The filing proposes to flow through 
$4,745,056.88 of Account No. 191 refunds and billing adjustments, 
including carrying charges, to Equitrans' former bundled sales 
customers.
    Equitrans states that this amount corresponds to refunds which 
Equitrans has received from upstream pipelines and suppliers since June 
1, 1994, when Equitrans filed to to direct bill its former Rate 
Schedule PLS customers for the positive balance in its Account No. 191 
upon termination of its PGA. The refunds relate to purchase activity 
which took place under Equitrans' former PGA through August 31, 1993. 
Upon acceptance of the tariff sheet, Equitrans states that it will flow 
through refunds on a lump-sum basis to its former sales customers under 
Rate Schedule PLS.
    Any person desiring to be heard or protest this application should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426, in accordance with Secs. 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests should be filed on 
or before March 28, 1995. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-7409 Filed 3-24-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

August 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4516

CW Bearing USA, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3371

ADH Guardian USA LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_5-30-2019.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel