alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4647

SPM Flow Control, Inc. DBA Weir SPM:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-5164

Nissan North America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXHIBIT 32
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Salisbury Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John F.
Perotti,  Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  and I, John F. Foley,  Chief
Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/  John F. Perotti                              /s/  John F. Foley
----------------------                            ----------------------------
     John F. Perotti                                   John F. Foley
     Chief Executive Officer                           Chief Financial Officer

Date:  May 10, 2006
SECOND SUPPLEMENT DATED SEPTEMBER 28, 2000 TO THE

                 CONFIDENTIAL PRIVATE PLACEMENT MEMORANDUM DATED

                                 APRIL 21, 2000

               MOBILE KIDNEY STONE CENTERS OF CALIFORNIA II, L.P.

                  Mobile  Kidney  Stone  Centers  of  California   II,  L.P.,  a
California limited  partnership (the  "Partnership"),  by this Second Supplement
hereby amends and supplements its Confidential  Private Placement  Memorandum of
April 21, 2000, as amended (the "Memorandum"). Capitalized terms used herein are
defined in the Glossary appearing in the Memorandum. Persons who have subscribed
for or are  considering  an investment  in the Units  offered by the  Memorandum
should carefully review this Second Supplement.

Extension of the Offering

                  Pursuant to the authority  given to the General Partner in the
Memorandum, the General Partner hereby elects to extend the offering termination
date to November 7, 2000 (or earlier in the  discretion of the General  Partner,
upon the sale of all Units as provided in the Memorandum).
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4115

Tianhai Electric North America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3421

Scosche Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 26, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-4871

Horizon Hobby LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 19, 2021

No. 04-21-00241-CV

Lucia SALDIVAR, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Mark Anthony Saldivar,

Appellant

v.

Joshua F. WHITE, Individually and d/b/a 88 Classic Records, and 88 Classic LLC,

Appellees

From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018-CI-11437

Honorable Cathleen M. Stryker, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On May 21, 2021, the trial court signed an order granting special appearances and 

dismissing plaintiff’s claims against defendants Joshua F. White, Individually and d/b/a 88 

Classic Records, and 88 Classic LLC. Appellant’s notice of appeal was due to be filed on June 

10, 2021. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(b). Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed on June 14, 2021. 

Appellant has not filed a motion for extension of time to file her notice of appeal. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 26.3.

A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good 

faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by Rule 26.1 but within the fifteen-day 

grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time. See Verburgt v. 

Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997) (construing the predecessor to Rule 26). However, the 

appellant must offer a reasonable explanation for failing to file the notice of appeal in a timely 

manner. See id.; TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3, 10.5(b)(1)(C).

It is therefore ORDERED that appellant file, no later than July 26, 2021, a response 

presenting a reasonable explanation for failing to file the notice of appeal in a timely manner. If 

appellant fails to respond within the time provided, the appeal will be dismissed. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.3(c).

_________________________________

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

FILE COPY
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 19th day of July, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4598

Apergy ESP Systems, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
Gateway 2000, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 33-08837) of our report dated January
30, 1997, on our audit of the consolidated financial statements and financial
statement schedule of Gateway 2000, Inc. as of December 31, 1995 and 1996, and
for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1996, which report
is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


                                       /s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
                                           COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

Omaha, Nebraska
March 26, 1997
<PAGE>   1
                                 EXHIBIT 21.1
                                      
                        Subsidiaries of the Registrant
                                      
                          (Global Industries, Ltd.)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                   NAME                                INCORPORATION
----------------------------------------------  --------------------------------
<S>                                             <C>
Global Divers and Contractors, Inc.             Louisiana
Global Pipelines PLUS, Inc.                     Louisiana
Pipelines, Incorporated                         Louisiana
Global Movible Offshore, Inc.                   Louisiana
Pelican Transportation, Inc.                    Louisiana
The Red Adair Company, Inc.                     Louisiana
Global Industries Offshore, Inc.                Delaware 
Global Offshore International, Ltd.             Cayman Islands 
Global International Vessels, Inc.              Cayman Islands                
Norman Offshore Pipelines, Inc.                 Louisiana
Global Offshore, Pty. Ltd.                      Australia
Global Industries Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd.        Indonesia
Global Offshore, Pte.                           Singapore
CCC  Fabricaciones y Construcciones, S.A.       Mexico
de C.V. (1)                             
================================================================================
</TABLE>
      


(1)     CCC Fabricaciones y Construcciones, S.A. de C.V. is a 49% owned, 
        unconsolidated subsidiary.      

        All other subsidiaries are 100% owned.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 61 (Thursday, March 30, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 16503]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7511]



[[Page 16503]]

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Bid Sale of Property; Cuyahoga Valley National Recreation Area

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Correction to notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice contains corrections to the notice published 
Friday, March 3, 1995. The notice announced the request for sealed bids 
for the sale of Cuyahoga Valley NRA tract 109-38, aka 1509 Boston Mills 
Road, Peninsula, Ohio.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 24, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Superintendent John P. Debo, Cuyahoga 
Valley National Recreation Area, 15610 Vaughn Road, Brecksville, OH 
44141 (216-526-5256).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On March 3, 1995 the National Park Service (NPS) published in the 
Federal Register (60 FR 11994) a notice announcing the request for 
sealed bids for the sale of Cuyahoga Valley NRA tract 109-38, aka 1509 
Boston Mills Road, Peninsula, Ohio. The correction to the notice 
advises potential bidders that the successful bidder shall have 
possession of property and title within sixty (60) days of the sealed 
bid opening date.

Need for Correction

    As published, the notice did not inform potential bidders that 
possession of the property and title shall take place within sixty (60) 
days of the bid opening date.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, the publication on March 3, 1995 of the notice 
announcing the request for sealed bids for the sale of Cuyahoga Valley 
NRA tract 109-38, aka 1509 Boston Mills Road, Peninsula, Ohio is 
corrected as follows:
    Add the following sentence to the end of the SUMMARY section: The 
successful high bidder shall have possession of property and title 
within sixty (60) days of the sealed bid opening.

    Dated: March 20, 1995.
John P. Debo,
Superintendent, Cuyahoga Valley NRA.
[FR Doc. 95-7511 Filed 3-29-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
#### Kenneth W. BRISCOE, Jr., Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. 64274, 64350.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

June 21, 1994.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Aug. 11, 1994.

Application to Transfer Denied Sept. 20, 1994.

David C. Hemingway, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Mary Moulton Bryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Kenneth Briscoe, appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
NUMBER 13-03-00579-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________________________

LENNAR CORPORATION, ET AL., APPELLANTS,

v.

MARK SCHLATTER, ET AL., APPELLEES.

_____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 107th District Court

of Cameron County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Yañez, Rodriguez, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants, Lennar Corporation, U.S. Home Corporation, David Garcia, Fabian Diaz,

and Sheldon Moore, have filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal as moot.

Appellants request that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants’ unopposed

motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX.
2

R.APP.P. 42.1(a). Appellants’ unopposed motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and the appeal

is hereby DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellants. See TEX.R.APP.P. 42.1(d)

("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having

dismissed the appeal at appellants’ request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained,

and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 10th day of April, 2008.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 57 (Friday, March 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15583-15584]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7306]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION
[Docket No. AB-429X]


Lakeside Transportation L.L.C., d/b/a Lakeside Transportation 
Company--Discontinuance of Service Exemption--Between Moberly and 
Excello, MO

AGENCY: Interstate Commerce Commission.

ACTION: Notice of exemption.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 10505, exempts from the 
prior approval requirements of 49 U.S.C. 10903 et seq. the 
discontinuance of service by Lakeside Transportation L.L.C., d/b/a 
Lakeside Transportation Company (LTC), over its entire line of 
railroad. LTC currently provides rail service over approximately 15.3 
miles of trackage under a lease agreement with the Norfolk & Western 
Transportation Company (NW), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Norfolk 
Southern Railway Company, between milepost SD-150.6 near Moberly, MO, 
and milepost SD-165.9 near Excello, MO. Because the transaction 
involves the discontinuance of LTC's entire operation, no labor 
protective conditions will be imposed.

DATES: Provided no formal expression of intent to file a financial 
assistance offer has been received, this exemption will be effective on 
April 23, 1995. Formal expressions of intent to file financial 
assistance offers\1\ under 49 CFR 1152.27(c)(2) must be filed by April 
3, 1995. Petitions to stay must be filed by April 10, 1995. Petitions 
to reopen must be filed by April 18, 1995.

    \1\See Exempt. of Rail Abandonment--Offers of Finan. Assist., 4 
I.C.C.2d 164 (1987).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

ADDRESSES: Send pleadings referring to Docket No. AB-429X to: (1) 
Office of the Secretary, Case Control Branch, [[Page 15584]] Interstate 
Commerce Commission, 1201 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 
20423; and (2) Petitioner's representative: William L. Slover, SLOVER & 
LOFTUS, 1224 Seventeenth Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph H. Dettmar, (202) 927-5660. 
(TDD for the hearing impaired: (202) 927-5721.)

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information is contained in the 
Commission's decision. To purchase a copy of the full decision, write 
to, call, or pick up in person from: Dynamic Concepts, Inc., Interstate 
Commerce Commission Building, 1201 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Room 
2229, Washington, DC 20423. Telephone: (202) 289-4357/4359. (Assistance 
for the hearing impaired is available through TDD services (202) 927-
5721.)

    Decided: March 10, 1995.

    By the Commission, Chairman McDonald, Vice Chairman Morgan, and 
Commissioners Simmons and Owen.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-7306 Filed 3-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7035-01-P