alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Presidential Documents

14351

Federal Register

Vol. 60, No. 52

Friday, March 17, 1995

Title 3—

The President

Proclamation 6777 of March 14, 1995

National Day of Prayer, 1995

By the President of the United States of America

A Proclamation

Our Nation was built on the steadfast foundation of the prayers of our

ancestors. In times of blessing and crisis, stability and change, thanksgiving

and repentance, appeals for Divine direction have helped the citizens of

the United States to remain faithful to our long-standing commitment to

life, liberty, and justice for all.

This reliance on spiritual assistance has especially characterized times of

national transition and uncertainty. As our country was ravaged by the

Civil War, Abraham Lincoln remarked, ‘‘I have been driven many times

upon my knees by the overwhelming conviction that I had nowhere else

to go.’’ And with him, millions of slaves cried out to the Almighty for

an end to their suffering.

Abolitionist Frederick Douglass said this about the spiritual songs sung

on the plantations: ‘‘Every tone was a testimony against slavery, and a

prayer to God for deliverance from chains.’’ Since that time, we have witnessed tremendous improvements in relations between people of all races

and backgrounds. Indeed, long ago, through the work of prayer and common

effort, and with the inspiration of the Creator, we began to turn the tide

in this Nation from divisiveness and recrimination toward reconciliation

and healing.

Let us not forget those painful lessons of our past, but continue to seek

the guidance of God in all the affairs of our Nation. We must not become

complacent, but rather press onward for the protection of the vulnerable

and the downtrodden. In the words of President Lincoln, ‘‘it behooves

us then to humble ourselves before the offended Power, to confess our

national sins and pray for clemency and forgiveness’’ for any injustice we

perceive in our midst. May we, the people of this country, set a steady

course, dedicated to respect for one another and for individual freedom.

The Congress, by Public Law 100–307, has called on our citizens to reaffirm

annually our dependence on Almighty God by recognizing a ‘‘National Day

of Prayer.’’

NOW, THEREFORE, I, WILLIAM J. CLINTON, President of the United States

of America, do hereby proclaim May 4, 1995, as a National Day of Prayer.

I call upon every citizen of this great Nation to gather together on that

day to pray, each in his or her own manner, for God’s continued guidance

and blessing.
14352 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 52 / Friday, March 17, 1995 / Presidential Documents

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this fourteenth day

of March, in the year of our Lord nineteen hundred and ninety-five, and

of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred

[FR Doc. 95–6795

Filed 3–15–95; 2:02 pm]

Billing code 3195–01–P

and nineteenth.

œ–
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 29, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-29-2000
<CASH>                                               1,675
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          694
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                        104,730
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   109,143
<PP&E>                                              89,638
<DEPRECIATION>                                      35,928
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     162,853
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               40,797
<BONDS>                                             22,338
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               133
<OTHER-SE>                                          93,212
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       162,853
<SALES>                                            339,929
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   339,929
<CGS>                                              238,097
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      238,097
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   1,010
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     19,934
<INCOME-TAX>                                         7,973
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 11,961
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        11,961
<EPS-BASIC>                                            .90
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .88



</TABLE>
#### Theresa Sullivan, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Jeremiah Sullivan, Deceased, Respondent, v H.I.P. Hospital, Inc., Doing Business as La Guardia Hospital, et al., Appellants.

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Santucci, J.), dated March 24, 1988, which denied their motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to comply with CPLR 3012-a. The appeal brings up for review so much of an order of the same court dated July 13, 1988, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination.

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated March 24, 1988, is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as that order was superseded by the order dated July 13, 1988, made upon reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated July 13, 1988, is affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements *(see, Kolb v Strogh, 158*AD2d 15 [decided herewith]). Mangano, P. J., Brown, Kooper and Harwood, JJ., concur.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2305

General Tools:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Nathaniel YOUNG, Appellant.

No. 63858.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

Nov. 1, 1994.

Rosalynn Koch, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Millie Aulbur, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before SMITH, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and WHITE, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from his conviction of first degree assault and armed criminal action. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. Rule 30.25(b).

Judgment affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 62 (Friday, March 31, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 16585-16586]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7944]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 93-185; RM-8249]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Estes Park, CO

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document allots FM Channel 271A to Estes Park, Colorado, 
as that community's first local FM service, in response to a petition 
for rule making filed on behalf of Hambric Associates. See 58 FR 37696, 
July 13, 1993. With this action, the proceeding is terminated.

DATES: Effective May 12, 1995. The window period for filing 
applications on Channel 271A at Estes Park, Colorado, will open on May 
12, 1995, and close on June 12, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Joyner, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2180. Questions related to the window application filing process 
for Channel 271A at Estes Park, Colorado, should be addressed to the 
Audio Services Division, FM Branch, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 418-2700.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 93-185, adopted March 21, 1995, and 
released March 28, 1995. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for [[Page 16586]] inspection and copying during normal 
business hours in the FCC's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, 
NW, Washington, D.C. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, International 
Transcription Service, Inc., (202) 857-3800, located at 1919 M Street, 
NW, Room 246, or 2100 M Street, NW, Suite 140, Washington, D.C. 20037.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

    Part 73 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: Secs. 303, 48 Stat., as amended, 1082; 47 U.S.C. 154, 
as amended.


Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Colorado, is 
amended by adding Estes Park, Channel 271A.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 95-7944 Filed 3-30-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Rema Charles v. Dickinson Independent School District, A.C.

Kantara, and Taylor Marine Construction of Texas, LLC

Appellate case number: 01

- 20

- 00 215

- CV

Trial court case number: 16CV0880

Trial court: 56 th District Court of Galveston County

Appell ee, A.C. Kantara, has filed a motion to extend time to file his appellee’s brief

. Appellant, Rema Charles, filed her appellant’s brief on March 30, 2020, thereby

establishing a deadline of April 29, 2020 for the filing of a brief by any appellee. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6( b ). Appell ee’s motion request s a ninety

- day extension of time to file its

. The motion is granted , in part

.

Appell ee’s brief of A.C. Kan tara is due to be filed no later than June 29, 2020

. Absent extraordinary circumstances, n o further extensions will be granted.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: _____ /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

_______  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __ April 28, 2020

___
**Exhibit 31.2**

**Certification**

I, Peterson S. Atkinson, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal controlover financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (f) and15d-15 (f)) for the registrant and have:

a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; 

b)      Designedsuch internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance withgenerally accepted accounting principles;

c)      Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedurespresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

d)   Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant's first fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant'sinternal control over financial reporting.

March 16, 2006

/s/PETER S. ATKINSON                       Peter S. Atkinson                    Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 59 (Tuesday, March 28, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15912]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7546]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP95-271-000]


Questar Pipeline Co.; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

March 22, 1995.
    Take notice that on March 17, 1995, Questar Pipeline Company 
(Questar), 79 South State Street, Salt Lake City, Utah 84111, filed in 
Docket No. CP95-271-000, a request pursuant to Sec. 157.205 of the 
Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) for 
authorization to construct and operate delivery point facilities on 
Questar's transmission system to serve the Western Market Center (WMC), 
under the authorization issued in Docket No. CP82-491-000 pursuant to 
Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set forth in the 
request which is on file with the Commission and open to public 
inspection.
    Questar proposes to construct and operate one 10-inch tap, 
approximately 1,250 linear feet of 10\3/4\-inch pipeline and 
appurtenant facilities at an estimated cost of $99,330. It states that 
the installation of the proposed facilities will allow Questar to 
deliver up to approximately 140 Mmcf per day to the WMC located in 
Lincoln County, Wyoming. Questar states that the WMC is a natural gas 
market hub where various pipeline companies tie into a single header 
facility. Questar submits that the header tie-in enables shippers to 
redirect natural gas, on a real-time basis, from one market to another. 
It is stated that the WMC is to be constructed, owned and operated by 
Overland Trail Transmission Company, an intrastate pipeline company, to 
provide service under Sec. 311 of the Natural Gas Policy Act.
    Questar explains that the proposed facilities will also serve as a 
receipt point, the installation and usage of which is automatically 
authorized pursuant to Questar's Part 157, Subpart F blanket 
certificate and by operation of the Commission's Regulations at 18 CFR 
157.208(a).
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Sec. 157.205 of the 
Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to the 
request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, the 
proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the day 
after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed and 
not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-7546 Filed 3-27-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

_________________

NO. 09

- 15

- 00 305

- CV



### _________________

IN RE GERALD B. WILSON

________________________________________________________________________ Original Proceeding 435th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 07

- 02

- 02127

- CV

________________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Gerald B. Wilson filed a petition for a writ of mandamus compelling the District Clerk of Montgomery C ounty, Texas, to forward Wilson’s pro se application for a writ of habeas corpus to this Court. I t appears that Wilson filed the application in a trial court civil case where he may have counsel of record. Other than to protect the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals, this Court’s mandamus jurisdiction does not extend to a district clerk. See Tex. Gov’t Code
Ann. § 22.221 (West 2004). The mandamus petition suggests that this Court has2 original habeas jurisd iction. See generally id

. § 22.221(d). 1 Our jurisdiction is invoked by filing an original petition with the appellate court , not the district court

. See Tex. R. App. P. 52. 1. Relator has not shown that the District Clerk has a ministerial duty to forward his application to the Court of Appeals

. See id

. ; compare with Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07, § 3 (West 2015). Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

PETITION DENIED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on August 26, 2015 Opinion Delivered August 27, 2015 Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.

1 Relator has not provided this Court with a copy of his application for a writ of habeas corpus, and we do not decide here whether he might have a cognizable claim

.
Exhibit 23.1

                      INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements
No. 333-00626 (SPS Transaction Services, Inc. START Plan); No. 33-84112
(SPS Transaction Services, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan); No. 33-
58924 (SPS Transaction Services, Inc. 1992 Employees Stock Plan and SPS
Transaction Services, Inc. Formula Plan for Non-Affiliate Directors);
No. 333-412 (SPS Transaction Services, Inc. Amended and Restated Tax
Deferred Equity Participation Plan); and No. 333-410 (SPS Transaction
Services, Inc. 1995 Omnibus Equity Plan) of SPS Transaction Services,
Inc. filed on Forms S-8  of our reports dated February 18, 1998,
included in and incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form
10-K of SPS Transaction Services, Inc. for the year ended December 31,
1997.




/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Chicago, Illinois
March 27, 1998
Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the following Registration Statements:

(1) Registration Statement Number 33-60730 on Form S-8 filed March 31, 1993,

(2) Registration Statement Number 333-27459 on Form S-8 filed May 20, 1997,

(3) Registration Statement Number 333-67033 on Form S-8 filed November 10, 1998,

(4) Registration Statement Number 333-87996 on Form S-8 filed May 10, 2002,

(5) Registration Statement Number 333-105081 on Form S-8 filed May 8, 2003,

(6) Registration Statement Number 333-129632 on Form S-8 filed November 10, 2005,

(7) Registration Statement Number 333-138302 on Form S-3 filed October 30, 2006, and

(8) Registration Statement Number 333-140400 on Form S-3 filed February 2, 2007.

of our report dated February 23, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements, financial statement schedule and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting which appears in this
Form 10-K.



|                   |  |  |  |                               
|------------------ |  |  |  | ------------------------------
|                   |  |  |  | /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
|New York, New York |  |  |  |                               
|February 23, 2009  |  |  |  |
exhibit10-2.htm




EXHIBIT 10.2


 


Mechanical Technology Incorporated 2006 Equity Incentive Plan


 


RESTRICTED STOCK AGREEMENT NOTICE 


 


BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND EMPLOYEES 


 


<Name> 


 


<Address> 


 


We are pleased to inform you that Mechanical Technology, Incorporated (“MTI”) has granted you Restricted Mechanical Technology Incorporated Common Stock. Your grant has been made under the Company’s 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), which together with the terms contained in this Notice, sets forth the terms and conditions of your grant and is incorporated herein by reference. A copy of the Plan is attached. Please review it carefully. 


 



	Grant Number:	 
	Date of Grant:	 
	Shares Granted:	 
	Issue Price:	 
	Grant Type:	 
	Vesting Start Date:	 







Taxes and Withholding: 


 


The vesting of this restricted stock grant is normally a taxable event, and if the Company determines that any federal, state, local or foreign tax or withholding payment is required relating to the vesting of shares arising from this grant, the Company shall have the right to require such payment from you, or withhold such amounts from other payments due to you from the Company. 


 


5