alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-3399

Nissan North America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
exv10w4







Exhibit 10.4




MODIFICATION TO COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENT FOR MARC H. LEVIN



In connection with the promotion of Marc H. Levin to Executive Vice President, General Counsel and
Corporate Secretary of Harris Interactive Inc. (the “Company”), on April 27, 2010, the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company approved an increase in the annual base salary
for Mr. Levin from $235,000 to $255,000 and an increase to his target annual cash bonus from 30% to
40% of his annual base salary, effective May 1, 2010.




As recognition for his service as interim Head of Human Resources, Mr. Levin received
a monthly bonus of $4,000 during the period commencing on January 1, 2010 and ending on April 12, 2010. The monthly bonus was paid in bi-weekly
installments and was pro-rated for the month of April 2010.
#### In the Matter of Parmod Dhawan, Appellant, v Office of Suffolk County Medical Examiner et al., Respondents.

Motion by the appellant to resettle a decision and order of this court dated March 27, 1989 *(Matter of Dhawan v Office of Suffolk County Med. Examiner,*148 AD2d 708), which reversed *688a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered October 15, 1987, to conform with Civil Service Law § 77 (as amended by L 1985, ch 851).

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

Ordered that the motion is granted to the extent that the decision and order of this court dated March 27, 1989, is amended by striking from the fourth line of the decretal paragraph following "March 15, 1985,” the words "less the amount of compensation earned by the petitioner in any other employment or occupation and any unemployment benefits he may have received during that period” and substituting therefor the words "until August 2, 1985, less the amount of compensation earned by the petitioner in any other employment or occupation and any unemployment benefits he may have received during that period, and back pay and benefits from August 2, 1985, less the amount of any unemployment benefits he may have received during that period.”

Civil Service Law §77 was amended effective August 2, 1985, to delete the provision that the amount of compensation earned by an employee in any other employment or occupation be deducted from an award of back pay (L 1985, ch 851). Consequently, the petitioner’s award of back pay for the period subsequent to that date shall be computed without deducting any compensation earned by him in any other employment or occupation. Mangano, P. J., Hooper, Rubin, Sullivan and Balletta, JJ., concur.
PUBLIC VERSION
$[*********] [******]

$[*********]

INPUT

20.0

$[*********]

[******]

[******]

0.05

PUBLIC VERSION
Consistent with USTR's Section 301 notice, OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. requests

confidential treatment for the information designated as business confidential in this submission. Such

information consists of information that would not customarily be released to the public, including

business or trade secrets regarding production costs and processes, data on sales, product characteristics

customers, destinations, and other product, sales, and cost-related business secrets. Business confidential

information has been indicated herein by enclosing it in single brackets (“[ ]”). A public version of these

comments is also being filed with all confidential information removed.

OMRON in the US is the only designer of this product and only supplier of this component.

SWITCH ASSY,RR AUTO is a molded plastic switch containing electrical switches, and is used only

for automotive purposes as a switch to move the windows open or closed. It is only used for further

assembly of components which go into domestic automobile production. which is specified by auto

manufacturer.

This product is not a target of the US Administration's 301 investigation regarding Intellectual Property

concerns. This is not a concern to IP transfer and impressment. This product contains no IP of interest

related to autonomous vehicle production.

The tariff action ultimately poses a risk of significant damage to OMRON, the domestic

automobile industry, and ultimately the US consumer as a increase in price. Like in the case of similar

approvals for vehicle components at the HTS level, OMRON views this product in the same manner.

Immediate movement of production to a US manufacturer or another country would pose significant

re-tooling costs, significant amounts of time, and approvals pertaining to consumer automobile safety

standards are costly and would take a significant amount of time to

obtain.

OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. believes that CBP can easily exclude the SWITCH

ASSY,RR AUTO in question based solely on the product description. The following are draft CBP

exclusion instructions:

"SWITCH ASSY,RR AUTO "T"-shaped assembly with a "U"-shaped switch oriented with the length of

the T shape "Metal, Plastic, Rubber, Other Material & Material Compound;Switch Assembly used by

Power Window switch (Rear right).Consist of Case assy, Cover, PCB ASSY and 2 strikers.Inside Case

Assy: Knob, light guide, plunger and spring." Dimensions 84 mm X 53 mm X 57.5 mm."

This information will be contained on the invoice from the supplier

PUBLIC VERSION
ex4c.htm










 





 


 






BASSLINE PRODUCTIONS, INC.







TOTAL AUTHORIZED ISSUE


100,000,000 SHARES PAR VALUE $.001 EACH


COMMON STOCK







THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ________________________________________ IS THE OWNER OF _________________________________________________________________________ FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE ABOVE CORPORATION TRANSFERABLE ONLY ON THE BOOKS OF THE CORPORATION BY THE HOLDER HEREOF IN PERSON OR BY DULY AUTHORIZED ATTORNEY UPON SURRENDER OF THIS CERTIFICATE PROPERLY ENDORSED WITNESS, THE SEAL OF THE CORPORATION AND THE SIGNATURES OF ITS DULY AUTHORIZED OFFICERS.







DATED







 







 


SECRETARY                                                                                     PRESIDENT
Organization Name:

Note: Representatives submitting on behalf of an organization must enter information below.

Requestor Representative:

Section 301 Investigation: China's Acts, Policies, and Practices Related to Technology 

Transfer, Intellectual Property, and Innovation - Form to Request Exclusion of Product

When submitting a product exclusion request using this form, enter the specified 

information in the following fields and explain the basis and rationale for your statements. 

By completing this form, you certify that the information provided is complete and 

correct to the best of your knowledge. 

1. Indicate whether the comment contains business confidential information (BCI), is a public

document, or is a public version of a BCI document.

3.

2. Please provide a complete and detailed description of the product of concern:

4.

5. Requestor's relationship to the product:

CONTINUED BELOW

*

10-digit HTSUS item number* for product you wish to address in this product exclusion request:

Use numerical characters only with no special characters (example: 1023456789). For help in finding 

the HTSUS item number associated with your product, see https://hts.usitc.gov/

1

7.

6. Does this submission in regulations.gov include additional attachments?

Please indicate whether any additional attachment contains business confidential

information (BCI), is a public document, or is a public version of a BCI document.

VERSION 1

Requestor Information

Requestor Name (Last, First):

Public Version of BCI

RC1514, 15.7 ton Capacity, 14.00 in Stroke, General Purpose Hydraulic Cylinder; Maximum Operating 

Pressure psi: 10000; Weight Kgs: 11,8; Oil Capacity Advance cm3: 723; Stroke Ranges mm: 290 - 

379

8412210075 Schmidt, Jackie Enerpac Jackie SchmidtImporter Yes Contains BCI
END 2

8. Is this product, or a comparable product, available from sources in the United States?:

VERSION 1

11. Please provide information in support your request, taking account of the instructions

provided in Section B of the Federal Register notice (note: text entered below can extend

beyond the apparent size of this box).

9. Is this product, or a comparable product, available from sources in third countries?:

10. Please provide the value and quantity (with units) of the Chinese-origin product of concern

that you purchased for each calendar year specified. Limit this figure to the products

purchased by your firm (or by members of your trade association) alone. Please provide 

estimates if precise figures are unavailable.

2016 Value:

2015 Value:

2017 Value:

2016 Quantity:

2015 Quantity:

2017 Quantity:

No No BCI BCI BCI BCI BCI BCI

See addendum for additional information.
EXHIBIT 21.1



PRINCIPAL OPERATING SUBSIDIARIES



|                             |  | State of Incorporation/Organization
|---------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------
|                            
|Beacon Manufacturing Company |  | North Carolina                     
|                            
|Fieldcrest Cannon, Inc.      |  | Delaware                           
|                            
|FCI Corporate LLC            |  | Delaware                           
|                            
|FCI Operations LLC           |  | Delaware                           
|                            
|Encee, Inc.                  |  | Delaware                           
|                            
|Pillowtex Canada Inc.        |  | Ontario, Canada                    
|                            
|Pillowtex, Inc.              |  | Delaware
Fourth Department,

June, 1990

(June 22, 1990)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Brenda L. Davis, Appellant.

Upon remittitur from the Court of Appeals, judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Upon remittitur from the Court of Appeals, we find, based upon our independent review of the record of the *Huntley*hearing, that defendant validly waived her right to counsel prior to confessing to Sheriff’s Deputies on August 26, 1985 *(see, People v Davis,*75 NY2d 517). Present—Doerr, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Pine and Lawton, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5080 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5080

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude certain Nurse 
                   Corps payments from gross income.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 28, 2023

Mr. Fitzpatrick (for himself, Mr. Higgins of New York, Mr. Thompson of 
  California, and Mrs. Kiggans of Virginia) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude certain Nurse 
                   Corps payments from gross income.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Nurse Corps Tax Parity Act of 
2023''.

SEC. 2. TAX TREATMENT OF CERTAIN NURSE CORPS PAYMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (4) of section 108(f) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``338B(g)'' and inserting 
``338B(g) or 846''.
    (b) Qualified Scholarships.--Subparagraph (A) of section 117(c)(2) 
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``the 
Public Health Service Act'' and inserting ``the Public Health Service 
Act or the scholarship program under section 846 of such Act''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to amounts received in taxable years beginning after the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |  |  |                                         |  |                    
|-------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------- |  | -------------------
|               |  |  |  | Southwest Bank,                        
|               |  |  |  | Trustee for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust
|               |  |  | 
|March 10, 2017 |  |  |  | By                                      |  | /S/ NANCY G. WILLIS
|               |  |  |  |                                         |  | Nancy G. Willis    
|               |  |  |  |                                         |  | Vice President
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3629

ECM Industries LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_5-30-2019.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
PUBLIC VERSION Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
$[*********] [******]

$[*********]

INPUT

20.0

$[*********]

[******]

[******]

0.05

PUBLIC VERSION
Consistent with USTR's Section 301 notice, OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. requests

confidential treatment for the information designated as business confidential in this submission. Such

information consists of information that would not customarily be released to the public, including

business or trade secrets regarding production costs and processes, data on sales, product characteristics

customers, destinations, and other product, sales, and cost-related business secrets. Business confidential

information has been indicated herein by enclosing it in single brackets (“[ ]”). A public version of these

comments is also being filed with all confidential information removed.

OMRON in the US is the only designer of this product and only supplier of this component.

POWER WINDOW SWITCH is a molded plastic switch, and is used only for automotive purposes of

raising and lowering windows, of which is an OEM-specified dimension. It is only used for further

assembly of components which go into domestic automobile production, which is specified by auto

manufacturer.

This product is not a target of the US Administration's 301 investigation regarding Intellectual Property

concerns. This is not a concern to IP transfer and impressment. This product contains no IP of interest

related to autonomous vehicle production.

The tariff action ultimately poses a risk of significant damage to OMRON, the domestic automobile

industry, and ultimately the US consumer as a increase in price. Like in the case of similar approvals for

vehicle components at the HTS level, OMRON views this product in the same manner. Immediate

movement of production to a US manufacturer or another country would pose significant re-tooling

costs, significant amounts of time, and approvals pertaining to consumer automobile safety standards are

costly and would take a significant amount of time to obtain.

OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. believes that CBP can easily exclude the POWER

WINDOW SWITCH in question based solely on the product description. The following are draft CBP

exclusion instructions:

POWER WINDOW SWITCH flat rectangular assembly with six switches: two "u" shaped on the

bottom row, two "u" shaped in the middle row, and two toggle switches oriented with the length of the

assembly "Metal, Plastic, Rubber, Other Material & Material Compound (Master 4 dr);Consist of Case

assy, Cover, PCB ASSY and 7 striker assys and 2 screws;Inside Case Assy: Knob, light guide, plunger

and spring." Dimensions 135mm X64mm X62.5mm."

This information will be contained on the invoice from the supplier.

PUBLIC VERSION
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v *609Michael Douglas, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Santagata, J.), both rendered February 27, 1989, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree under indictment No. 67587, and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fourth degree under indictment No. 67867, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Brown, Rubin, Balletta and Miller, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements on Form S-8/S-3 (File No. 33-48889), Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-67456,
33-86152, 33-96114, and 33-65357), and Form S-3 (File No. 33-92796) of i-STAT
Corporation of our report dated January 31, 2000, except for the last paragraph
of Note 11 as to which the date is March 16, 2000, relating to the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule, which report
is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the reference
to our firm under the caption "Selected Consolidated Financial Data".


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Florham Park, New Jersey
March 30, 2000
# STATEOFLOUISIANA



# COURTOFAPPEAL,FIRSTCIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA 

### VERSUS PORTER MAJOR, JR. NO. 

### 2021 KW 1622 FEBRUARY 25, 

### 2022 In Re: Porter Major, Jr., 

### applying for 

### supervisory writs,



### 19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 

### 03-17-0923. BEFORE: WHIPPLE, C.J., 

### MCCLENDON AND PENZATO, JJ.

WRIT DENIED. The East Baton Rouge 

### Parish Clerk of Court has no record of 

### receiving a Motion to Correct an Illegal Sentence ( 

### allegedly 

### filed on 

## July 17, 2021). Relator should 

### file the motion with the 

### district court 

### before seeking relief 

### from this court. VGW PMC AHP



### COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT



### DEPUTY CL RK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
Order filed November 18 , 2014.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 14

- 00375

- CR

____________ FRANK JAMES DISTEFAN O , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 338th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1402036



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due June 30, 2014

. See Tex. R. App.
P. 35.1. On August 12, 2014 , this court ordered the court reporter to file the record within 30 days. On September 11, 2014 , the court reporter notified the court that no payment arrangements had been made for the record. On September 22, 2014 , the court reporter notified the court that payment arrangements had been
made. The court extended the due date to October 20, 2014 bec ause we receivedproof of payment. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the

reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Patricia Palmer , the substitute court reporter, to file the record in this app eal within 30 days of the date of this order

. No further extension will be
entertained . The trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). If Patricia
Palmer does not timely file the record as ordered, we will issue an order directing the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the reason for the failure to file the
record.

PER CURIAM