alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of China Aoxing Pharmaceutical Company, Inc. (the Company) certifies that: 1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period  ended September 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  November 14, 2006 /s/ Zhenjiang Yue Zhenjiang Yue, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 62 (Friday, March 31, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16700-16701]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7902]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Thrift Supervision

Public Information Collection Requirements Submitted to OMB for 
Review

March 23, 1995.
    The Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) has submitted the following 
public information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and 
clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, Public Law 96-11. 
Copies of the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the OTS 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
OTS Clearance Officer, Office of Thrift Supervision, 1700 G Street, 
NW., Washington, D.C. 20552.

OMB Number: 1550-0062
Form Number: Not Applicable
Type of Review: Extension
Title: Minimum Security Devices and Procedures
Description: The Bank Protection Act and OTS implementing regulations 
require savings associations to establish security devices and 
procedures. The required written security program allows OTS to 
evaluate whether savings associations have adopted polices and 
procedures to ensure compliance with the regulations and statute. 
[[Page 16701]] 
Respondents: Savings and Loan Associations and Savings Banks
Estimated Number of Recordkeepers: 1,540
Estimated Burden Hours Per Recordkeeper: 2 Hrs. Avg.
Frequency of Response: Recordkeeping
Estimated Total Recordkeeping Burden: 3,080 Hrs.
Clearance Officer: Colleen M. Devine, (202) 906-6025, Office of Thrift 
Supervision, 1700 G Street NW., Washington, D.C. 20552.
OMB Reviewer: Milo Sunderhauf, (202) 395-7340, Office of Management and 
Budget, Room 10226, New Executive Office Building, Washington, D.C. 
20503.
Cora Prifold Beebe,
Director of Administration.
[FR Doc. 95-7902 Filed 3-30-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-P
```
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4745

Scosche Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3910

Helen of Troy:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
#### T.J.C., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 40490.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Dec. 6, 1988.

Craig A. Johnston, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Elizabeth Levin Ziegler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before KENNEDY, C.J., and BERREY and COVINGTON, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from denial, after evidentiary hearing, of Rule 27.26 motion for post-conviction relief.

*489JUDGMENT AFFIRMED. Rule 84.-16(b).
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5018

OMRON Management Center of America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Patrick J. Dirk, certify forpurposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, theQuarterly Report of TROY Group, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly periodended August 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that informationcontained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Troy Group, Inc.

 

 
| Date:   October 15, 2004 |                                          |                 |
|------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|----------------------|
|                               |                                          |                 |
|                               |                                          |                 |
|                               | By:                                           | /s/ Patrick  J. Dirk |   |
|                               | Name:  Patrick J. Dirk                        |
|                               | Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
1

Filed 9/10/24 P. v. Vargas CA4/2

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

FRANCISCO VARGAS,

Defendant and Appellant. E083304

(Super.Ct.No. BPR2301497)

OPINION

APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Sylwia Luttrell

,

Temporary Judge. (Pursuant to Cal. Const., art. VI, § 21.) . Dismissed.

Reed Webb, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and

Appellant.

No appearance by Plaintiff and Respondent.2 INTRODUCTION

A trial court found that d efendant and appellant Francisco Vargas violated his

parole by using methamphetamine. The court ordered his parole revoked, and defendant

now appeals

. Counsel filed a brief raising no arguable issues under People v.

Delgadillo (2022) 14 Cal.5th 216 ( Delgadillo ).

On July 15 , 2024, we notified defendant: (1) counsel filed a brief indicating no

arguable issues had been identified; (2) as a case arising from an order denying

postconviction relief, this court was not required to conduct an independent review of the

record, but we could do so in our discretio n; and (3) in accordance with the procedures

set forth in Delgadillo , he had 30 days in which to file a supplemental brief raising any

argument he wanted this court to consider. We also notified defendant that if we did not

receive a brief within that 30

- day period, we may dismiss the appeal as abandoned. More

than 30 days have elapsed, and we have received no communication from defendant. We

consider defendant ’ s appeal abandoned and order the appeal dismissed. ( Delgadillo,

supra , 14 Cal.5th at p. 232.)3 DISPOSITION

The appeal is dismissed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

FIELDS

J.

We concur:

McKINSTER

Acting P. J.

CODRINGTON

J.
**Exhibit 23.1**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-41961, No.333-33576, No. 333-56950, No. 333-65748, No. 333-90156, No. 333-107637, No. 333-118095, and No.333-134948 on Form S-8 of our reports dated February 27, 2008 (which reports express an unqualifiedopinion and include an explanatory paragraph referring to the Company adopting the fair valuerecognition provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (Revised 2004), *ShareBased Payment,*effective January 1, 2006 and the recognition and measurement provisions ofFinancial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, *Accounting for Uncertainty in IncomeTaxes – an Interpretation of SFAS No. 109*effective January 1, 2007), relating to the consolidatedfinancial statements and financial statement schedules of AmSurg Corp. and subsidiaries (the“Company”), and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting,appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of AmSurg Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2007./s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLPNashville, Tennessee
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 26, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-4488

Zipline International Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4123 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4123

     To require a report on Federal support of the cybersecurity of 
         commercial satellite systems, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 2, 2022

  Mr. Ossoff introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To require a report on Federal support of the cybersecurity of 
         commercial satellite systems, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Enhancing Satellite Cybersecurity 
Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION.

    In this Act, the term ``commercial satellite system'' means an 
earth satellite owned and operated by a non-Federal entity.

SEC. 3. REPORT ON COMMERCIAL SATELLITE CYBERSECURITY.

    Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Comptroller General of the United States shall report to Congress on 
the actions the Federal Government has taken to support the 
cybersecurity of commercial satellite systems, which shall include 
information on--
            (1) the extent to which Federal agencies are reliant on 
        commercial satellite systems owned wholly or in part or 
        controlled by foreign entities, and how Federal agencies 
        mitigate associated cybersecurity risks; and
            (2) the extent to which Federal agencies are reliant on 
        commercial satellite systems with physical structures, such as 
        satellite ground control systems, in foreign countries, and how 
        Federal agencies mitigate associated cybersecurity risks.

SEC. 4. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE CYBERSECURITY AND INFRASTRUCTURE 
              SECURITY AGENCY.

    (a) In General.--The Director of the Cybersecurity and 
Infrastructure Security Agency shall consolidate voluntary 
cybersecurity recommendations designed to assist in the development, 
maintenance, and operation of commercial satellite systems.
    (b) Requirements.--The recommendations consolidated under 
subsection (a) shall include, to the greatest extent practicable, 
materials addressing the following:
            (1) Protection against vulnerabilities posed by ownership 
        of commercial satellite systems or commercial satellite system 
        companies by foreign entities.
            (2) Protection against vulnerabilities posed by locating 
        physical infrastructure, such as satellite ground control 
        systems, in foreign countries.
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATION

 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the "Report") of America First Real Estate Investment Partners, L.P. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, I, Mark A. Hiatt, Chief Financial Officer of the general partner of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

/s/ Mark A. Hiatt

Mark A. Hiatt

Chief Financial Officer

May 9, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to America First Real Estate Investment Partners, L.P. and will be retained by America First Real Estate Investment Partners, L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Gretchen L. Johnston, Respondent, v Oswald L. Johnston, Jr., Appellant.

Clarification granted to extent of deleting decretal paragraph of this court’s order (161 AD2d 125) entered on May 1, 1990 and substituting therefor the following (with additions italicized): "It is unanimously ordered that the judgment (denominated order) so appealed from be and the same is hereby modified, on the law and facts, solely to vacate that portion of the award which ruled upon respondent’s support obligations to Anthony and *remand it*for a new hearing before the same arbitrator on that issue only, and *to provide that*the award is otherwise *confirmed, and, as modified, the judgment is otherwise*affirmed, without costs and without disbursements.” Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Asch, Wallach, Smith and Rubin, JJ.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4351 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to clarify the conditions 

under which the Secretary of Health and Human Services can approve 

generic drug applications with labeling temporarily different than the 

brand name drug, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 6, 2022 

Mr. ROMNEY (for himself, Ms. HASSAN, Ms. ROSEN, and Mr. 

HICKENLOOPER) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to 

clarify the conditions under which the Secretary of 

Health and Human Services can approve generic drug 

applications with labeling temporarily different than the 

brand name drug, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Enhanced Access to 

5 Affordable Medicines Act of 2022’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4351 IS

1 SEC. 2. ENHANCING ACCESS TO AFFORDABLE MEDICINES. 

2 Section 505(j)(10)(A) of the Federal Food, Drug, 

3 and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(j)(10)(A)) is amended 

4 by striking clauses (i) through (iv) and inserting the fol5 lowing: 

6 ‘‘(i) a revision to the labeling of the listed drug 

7 has been approved by the Secretary within 90 days 

8 of when the application is otherwise eligible for ap9 proval under this subsection; 

10 ‘‘(ii) the sponsor of the application agrees to 

11 submit revised labeling for the drug that is the sub12 ject of the application not later than 60 days after 

13 approval under this subsection of the application; 

14 and 

15 ‘‘(iii) the labeling revision described under 

16 clause (i) does not include a change to the ‘Warn17 ings’ section of the labeling.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Order entered March 12, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01436-CR

SHAWN RYAN BLANKINSHIP, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law

Rockwall County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CR17-0584

ORDER

Before the Court is court reporter Deborah Hamon’s March 9, 2020 request 

to extend time to file the reporter’s record. We GRANT the request and ORDER

the reporter’s record due on or before March 18, 2020.

/s/ CORY L. CARLYLE 

JUSTICE
Exhibit
32.1



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Quarterly  Report of B Green Innovations, Inc. Inc. (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for
the period ended September 30, 2015, as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certify, pursuant  to and solely for the
purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge:



1.  	The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



2.  	The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.









|                                      |     |                                        | 
|------------------------------------- | --- | -------------------------------------- | 
|Date:           November
    13, 2015 | By: | /s/ Jerome
    Mahoney                 | 
|                                      |     | Jerome Mahoney                         | 
|                                      |     | President, Chief Executive Officer and | 
|                                      |     | Chief Financial Officer                |