13432 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 48 / Monday, March 13, 1995 / Notices

agreement to the early termination of

transportation of transportation service

under Rate to the early termination of

transportation service under Rate

Schedules T–1, all as more fully set

forth in the application which is on file

with the Commission and open to

public inspection.

Ozark states that pursuant to a

Transportation Agreement between

Ozark and Tennessee dated March 1,

1982, (Agreement), Ozark provides

Tennessee firm transportation of a

maximum daily volume of fifty percent

of Ozark’s capacity or 85,000 Mcf per

day under Ozark’s Rate Schedule T–1.

Ozark states that Columbia Gas

Transmission Corporation (Columbia) is

entitled to the remaining fifty percent of

Ozark’s capacity under Rate Schedule

T–1. Ozark asserts that the Agreement

expires on February 28, 1997. Ozark

further asserts that Order No. 636

virtually eliminated Tennessee’s

merchant function and thereby stranded

Tennessee’s capacity on Ozark.

Ozark states that pursuant to a

Stipulation dated December 9, 1994,

Ozark and Tennessee agreed to the

terms and conditions for the early

termination of the Agreement. Ozark

states the terms of the Stipulation

include Ozark’s abandonment of service

to Tennessee under Rate Schedule T–1,

Ozark’s acquisition of Tennessee’s X3–

100 lateral line; and Ozark’s charging

Tennessee a negotiated exit fee. Ozark

requests authority to implement the

terms of the Stipulation. Ozark states

that the Stipulation would be effective

upon the date the Commission has

issued final orders approving without

modification both this Stipulation and

the stipulation between Ozark and

Columbia also dated December 9, 1994,

setting forth the terms and conditions of

Ozark’s abandonment of firm

transportation to Columbia under Rate

Schedule T–1. Ozark further states that

Tennessee filed in Docket No. RP95–144

on January 27, 1995 for approval of the

Stipulation and Columbia filed in

Docket No. RP95–98 on December 20,

1994 for approval of the stipulation

between Ozark and Columbia.

Ozark requests that the order

approving the Stipulation authorize

under specific circumstances the

reinstatement of the Agreement; service

under the Agreement; and Ozark’s

minimum bill and demand charges.

Ozark states that the proposed Exit

Fee would be calculated using a formula

set forth in the Stipulation. Ozark

further states the amount which

Tennessee would be obligated to pay

pursuant to the Exit Fee formula would

depend on the date the Stipulation

becomes effective and the amount of

excess capacity at that time.

Ozark states that the X3–100 lateral

line consists of 4.76 miles of 12-inch

line that interconnects Ozark with Texas

Eastern Transmission Corporation.

Ozark states that Tennessee would no

longer have any use for this line after

the abandonment of Ozark’s service to

Tennessee. Ozark proposes to acquire

the line from Tennessee at a price equal

to the lower of $1.7 million or the actual

net book value of the facilities.

Any person desiring to be heard or to

make any protest with reference to said

application should on or before March

28, 1995, file with the Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission, Washington,

D.C. 20426, a motion to intervene or a

protest in accordance with the

requirements of the Commission’s Rules

of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR

385.214 or 385.211) and the Regulations

under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR

157.10). All protests filed with the

Commission will be considered by it in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken but will not serve to make the

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

to a proceeding or to participate as a

party in any hearing therein must file a

motion to intervene in accordance with

the Commission’s Rules.

Take further notice that, pursuant to

the authority contained in and subject to

the jurisdiction conferred upon the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

by Sections 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas

Act and the Commission’s Rules of

Practice and Procedure, a hearing will

be held without further notice before the

Commission or its designee on this

application if no motion to intervene is

filed within the time required herein, if

the Commission on its own review of

the matter finds that a grant of the

certificate, and permission and approval

for the proposed abandonment are

required by the public convenience and

necessity. If a motion for leave to

intervene is timely filed, or if the

Commission on its won motion believes

that a formal hearing is required, further

notice of such hearing will be duly

given.

Under the procedure herein provided

for, unless otherwise advised, it will be

unnecessary for Ozark to appear or be

represented at the hearing.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–6040 Filed 3–10–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. RP93–55–004]

Trailblazer Pipeline Co.; Notice of

Refund Report

March 7, 1995.

Take notice that on February 16, 1995,

Trailblazer Pipeline Company

(Trailblazer) filed its Report of

Distribution of Refunds for Docket No.

RP93–55 for the period August 1, 1994

through October 31, 1994.

Trailblazer states that the refund was

made in compliance with the provisions

of Article 2.4 of the Stipulation and

Agreement (Settlement) filed on August

19, 1994 in the above-referenced

proceeding and was approved by a

Commission order issued October 31,

1994. On December 30, 1994,

Trailblazer paid its jurisdictional

customers the refunds owed to them.

Trailblazer states that copies of the

filing were served upon each of

Trailblazer’s jurisdictional customers,

intervenors and interested state

regulatory agencies.

Any person desiring to protest said

filing should file a protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street, N.E.,

Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance

with 18 CFR 385.211 of the

Commission’s Rules and Regulations.

All such protests should be filed on or

before March 14, 1995. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Copies of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection in the public reference room.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–6041 Filed 3–10–94; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. ER95–245–000]

West Texas Utilities Co.; Notice of

Filing

March 7, 1995.

Take notice that on March 3, 1995,

West Texas Utilities Company (WTU)

tendered for filing an amendment to its

Coordination Sales Tariff, filed

November 30, 1994. Under the

Coordination Sales Tariff, WTU will

make Economy Energy, Short-Term

Power and Energy, General Purpose

Energy and Emergency Service available

to customers upon mutual agreement.

The amendment lowers the rate for

purchase and resale transactions.

WTU has asked for an effective date

of January 31, 1995. Copies of this filing

were served on the Public Utility