alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



October 29, 2004



Board of Directors

Killbuck Bancshares, Inc.



We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Killbuck Bancshares, Inc.,
Inc. and its consolidated subsidiary as of September 30, 2004, and the related consolidated statements of income for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, and the consolidated statement of changes in
stockholders equity for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2004 and the consolidated statement of cash flows for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2004 and 2003. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of
the Companys management.



We conducted our review in accordance with
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial
and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial
statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.



Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.



We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2003, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not
presented herein); and in our report dated January 30, 2004 we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.



/s/ S.R. SNODGRASS, A.C.

---

S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.

626 North Fourth Street

Steubenville, Ohio 43952-1982

Phone: 740-282-2771

Facsimile: 740-282-1606
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                            PAYLESS SHOESOURCE, INC.
                      COMPUTATION OF NET EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                     May 5,     April 29,
(Thousands, except per share)        2001         2000
                                    -------     --------
<S>                                 <C>         <C>
Basic Computation:

Net earnings                        $29,650     $25,467
Weighted average common
 shares outstanding                  22,164      28,449
                                    -------     -------

Basic earnings per share            $  1.34     $  0.90
                                    =======     =======

Diluted Computation:

Net earnings                        $29,650     $25,467

Weighted average common
 shares outstanding                  22,164      28,449

Net effect of dilutive stock
  options based on the treasury
  stock method                          631         107
                                    -------     -------

Outstanding shares for diluted
  earnings per share                 22,795      28,556
                                    =======     =======


Diluted earnings per share          $  1.30     $  0.89
                                    =======     =======
</TABLE>


Note: Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net earnings by the
weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period.
Diluted earnings per share includes the effect of conversions of options.
Exhibit 32.1

| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|               | B GREEN INNOVATIONS, INC. |                                                           |
|--------------------|---------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
|               |                      |                                                           |   |
| Date: May 13, 2011 | By:                       | /s/ Jerome Mahoney                                             |   |
|               |                      | Jerome Mahoney                                                 |   |
|               |                      | President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |   |
|               |                      |                                                           |   |

----
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 55 (Wednesday, March 22, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15139-15140]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6990]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. PR95-7-000]


The Tekas Corp.; Notice of Petition for Rate Approval

March 16, 1995.
    Take notice that on March 1, 1995, the Tekas Corporation (Tekas) 
filed pursuant to section 284.123(b)(2) of the Commission's 
regulations, a petition for rate approval requesting that the 
Commission approve as fair and equitable a maximum rate of $0.3334 per 
Mcf, plus a pro rata share of fuel and lost and unaccounted for 
volumes, for transportation services performed under section 311(a)(2) 
of the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978 (NGPA).
    Tekas states that it is an intrastate pipeline within the meaning 
of section 2(16) of the NGPA and it owns and operates an intrastate 
pipeline system in the State of Kansas. Tekas proposes an effective 
date of March 1, 1995.
    Pursuant to section 284.123(b)(2)(ii), if the Commission does not 
act within 150 days of the filing date, the rate will be deemed to be 
fair and equitable and not in excess of an amount which 
[[Page 15140]] interstate pipelines would be permitted to charge for 
similar transportation service. The Commission may, prior to the 
expiration of the 150-day period, extend the time for action or 
institute a proceeding to afford parties an opportunity for written 
comments and for the oral presentation of views, data, and arguments.
    Any person desiring to participate in this rate proceeding must 
file a motion to intervene in accordance with sections 385.211 and 
385.214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedures. All 
motions must be filed with the Secretary of the Commission on or before 
March 31, 1995. The petition for rate approval is on file with the 
Commission and is available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-6990 Filed 3-21-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Order filed, August 14, 2018

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 18

- 00705

- CV

____________ IN THE INTEREST OF A .A.A., A CHILD , Appellant

On Appeal from the 257th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2015

- 50346



### ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due May 25, 2018

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Eunice Tillman , the court reporter, to file the record in this appeal
within 15 days of the date of this order

. PER CURIAM
V 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 493 

For the relief of Michael Janssen and Steven Passantino. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 24, 2023 

Mr. FERGUSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Michael Janssen and Steven Passantino. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER RETIREMENT 

4 BENEFITS FOR MICHAEL JANSSEN AND STE5 VEN PASSANTINO. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi7 sion of law, Michael Janssen and Steven Passantino shall, 

8 during any period they are employed as series 1895 offi9 cers of the U.S. Customs and Border Protection before, 

10 on, or after the date of enactment of this Act, be deemed 

11 to be performing service as a law enforcement officer (as 

12 that term is defined in section 8401 of title 5, United 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 493 IH

1 States Code) under chapter 84 of such title, and shall be 

2 subject to the terms and conditions applicable under such 

3 chapter to such officers. 

4 (b) CREDITABLE SERVICE; DEPOSIT.—Any cred5 itable service performed before the date of enactment of 

6 this Act by Michael Janssen and Steven Passantino under 

7 such chapter 84 as such series 1895 officers shall be 

8 deemed to be service as such a law enforcement officer, 

9 but only if they meet the deposit requirements of section 

10 8411(f) of such title 5 with respect to such service. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-4581

Zipline International Inc: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

I, James W. Klingler,certify for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, theQuarterly Report of TROY Group, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly periodended May 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in suchForm 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of Troy Group, Inc.

 

 
| Date:  July 15,  2004 |                                                         |                 |
|----------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|
|                       |                                                         |                 |
|                       |                                                         |                 |
|                       | By:                                                          | /s/James W. Klingler |   |
|                       | Name: James W. Klingler                                      |
|                       | Title: Vice President  Finance & Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

April 12, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4575

ECM Industries LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_04.15.19.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3530

Tianhai Electric North America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-4526

CW Bearing USA, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 26, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4700

C&U Americas, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
#### EDWIN SALMON v. DR. WORTHAM WYATT.

(Filed 14 June, 1941.)

Torts § 8c—

Release from liability for tort *held*effective on the principle of ratification upon authority of *Presnell v. Liner,*218 N. C., 152.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Pless, J.,*at January Term, 1941, of Eobsyth.

Civil action instituted 25 June, 1940, to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by an excessive dosage of X-ray administered to the plaintiff by the defendant on 26 June, 1937.

The defendant denied liability and pleaded a release signed by the plaintiff and his wife on 2 October, 1937, as a bar to the action.

From judgment of nonsuit entered at the close of plaintiff’s evidence, he appeals, assigning errors.

*JElledge & Wells and Gilbert L. Shermer for plaintiff, appellant.*

*Sapp, Sapp & Athinson, Manly, Hendren ,& Womble, and W. P. Sandridge for defendant, appellee.*

*823Per Curiam.

The facts in the instant case in respect of the release signed by the plaintiff and his wife are not materially different from those appearing in the case of *Presnell v. Liner,*218 N. C., 152, 10 S. E. (2d), 639. There, the release was held to be effective on the principle of ratification. The same principle is applicable here.

The judgment of nonsuit will be upheld on authority of the *Presnell case, supra.*

Affirmed.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4612

Apergy ESP Systems, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel