12180 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 43 / Monday, March 6, 1995 / Proposed Rules

APPENDIX A TO PART 117—DRAWBRIDGES EQUIPPED WITH RADIOTELEPHONES

Waterway Mile Location Bridge name and

owner

Call

sign

Calling

channel

Working

channel

* * * * * * *

NEW JERSEY

* * * * * * *

New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway.

(Beach Thorofare) ................................................. 68.9 Atlantic City ................. AMTRAK ..................... WXZ

528.

13 13

* * * * * * *

Dated: February 3, 1995.

W.J. Ecker,

Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander

Fifth Coast Guard District.

[FR Doc. 95–5386 Filed 3–3–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–14–M

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[CA 95–3–6638b; FRL–5160–1]

Approval and Promulgation of State

Implementation Plans; California State

Implementation Plan Revision; San

Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution

Control District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve

revisions to the California State

Implementation Plan (SIP) that concern

the control of volatile organic

compound (VOC) emissions from in-situ

combustion well vents. The intended

effect of proposing approval of this rule

is to regulate emissions of VOCs in

accordance with the requirements of the

Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990

(CAA or the Act). In the Rules section

of this Federal Register, the EPA is

approving the state’s SIP revision as a

direct final rule without prior proposal

because the Agency views this as a

noncontroversial revision amendment

and anticipates no adverse comments. A

detailed rationale for this approval is set

forth in the direct final rule. If no

adverse comments are received in

response to this proposed rule, no

further activity is contemplated in

relation to this rule. If EPA receives

adverse comments, the direct final rule

will be withdrawn and all public

comments received will be addressed in

a subsequent final rule based on this

proposed rule. The EPA will not

institute a second comment period on

this document. Any parties interested in

commenting on this action should do so

at this time.

DATES: Comments on this proposed rule

must be received in writing by April 5,

1995.

ADDRESSES: Written comments on this

action should be addressed to: Daniel A.

Meer, Rulemaking Section (A–5–3), Air

and Toxics Division, U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency,

Region 9, 75 Hawthorne Street, San

Francisco, CA 94105–3901.

Copies of the rule revisions and EPA’s

evaluation report of each rule are

available for public inspection at EPA’s

Region IX office during normal business

hours. Copies of the submitted rule

revisions are also available for

inspection at the following locations:

California Air Resources Board,

Stationary Source Division, Rule

Evaluation Section, 2020 ‘‘L’’ Street,

Sacramento, CA 95812.

San Joaquin Valley Unified Air

Pollution Control District, 1999

Tuolumne Street, Suite 200, Fresno,

California 93721.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mae

Wang, Rulemaking Section (A–5–3), Air

and Toxics Division, U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency,

Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San

Francisco, CA 94105–3901, Telephone:

(415) 744–1200.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This

document concerns San Joaquin Valley

Unified Air Pollution Control District

Rule 4407, In-Situ Combustion Well

Vents, submitted to EPA on July 13,

1994 by the California Air Resources

Board. For further information, please

see the information provided in the

direct final action which is located in

the Rules section of this Federal

Register.

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401–7671q.

Dated: February 8, 1995.

Felicia Marcus,

Regional Administrator.

[FR Doc. 95–5343 Filed 3–3–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–W

40 CFR Part 52

[IL99–01–6621, IN46–01–6622, MI33–01–

6626, WI47–01–6627; FRL–5165–1]

Approval of a Section 182(f)

Exemption; Illinois, Indiana, Michigan,

and Wisconsin

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: On July 13, 1994, the States

of Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, and

Wisconsin (the States) submitted to the

EPA a petition (the petition) for an

exemption from the requirements of

section 182(f) of the Clean Air Act (Act).

The States, acting through the Lake

Michigan Air Directors Consortium

(LADCo), are petitioning for an

exemption from the Reasonably

Available Control Technology (RACT)

and New Source Review (NSR)

requirements for major stationary

sources of oxides of nitrogen (NOx). In

the Lake Michigan Ozone Study (LMOS)

modeling domain, the RACT

requirements apply to major stationary

sources of NOx located in areas

currently classified as moderate and

above nonattainment for ozone. The

NSR requirements apply to major

stationary sources of NOx located in

areas currently classified as marginal

and above nonattainment for ozone. The

petition also seeks an exemption from

the transportation and general

conformity requirements for NOx in all

ozone nonattainment areas in the

modeling domain. Although the petition

does not specifically request an

exemption from the Inspection/

Maintenance (I/M) program

requirements, the approval of the

petition will impact the I/M NOx