alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4328 

To modify the fire management assistance cost share, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 26, 2022 

Mr. PADILLA (for himself, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. LUJA ́N, Mr. HEINRICH, and 

Mrs. MURRAY) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To modify the fire management assistance cost share, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fire Suppression Im5 provement Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FIRE MANAGEMENT ASSISTANCE COST SHARE AND 

7 ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 420 of the Robert T. 

9 Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act 

10 (42 U.S.C. 5187) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4328 IS

1 (1) by redesignating subsection (e) as sub2 section (g); and 

3 (2) by inserting after subsection (d) the fol4 lowing: 

5 ‘‘(e) FEDERAL SHARE.—The Federal share of assist6 ance under this section shall be not less than 75 percent 

7 of the eligible cost of such assistance. 

8 ‘‘(f) ELIGIBLE EXPENSE.—A State or local govern9 ment may use assistance provided under this section for 

10 the predeployment of assets and resources.’’. 

11 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendments made by sub12 section (a) shall only apply to amounts appropriated on 

13 or after the date of enactment of this Act. 

14 SEC. 3. RULEMAKING. 

15 Not later than 3 years after the date of enactment 

16 of this Act, the President, acting through the Adminis17 trator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, 

18 shall conduct and complete a rulemaking to provide cri19 teria for the circumstances under which the Administrator 

20 may recommend the President increase the Federal cost 

21 share for section 420 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster 

22 Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5187). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 51 (Thursday, March 16, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 14286]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6475]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


First Security Bancorp, et al.; Formations of; Acquisitions by; 
and Mergers of Bank Holding Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied for the Board's 
approval under section 3 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 
1842) and Sec.  225.14 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.14) to 
become a bank holding company or to acquire a bank or bank holding 
company. The factors that are considered in acting on the applications 
are set forth in section 3(c) of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Each application is available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. Once the application has been accepted 
for processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing to the Reserve Bank or to the offices of the Board of 
Governors. Any comment on an application that requests a hearing must 
include a statement of why a written presentation would not suffice in 
lieu of a hearing, identifying specifically any questions of fact that 
are in dispute and summarizing the evidence that would be presented at 
a hearing.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received not later than April 10, 1995.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Randall C. Sumner, Vice 
President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166:
    1. First Security Bancorp, Searcy, Arkansas; to acquire 100 percent 
of the voting shares of Farmers Investment Corporation, Little Rock, 
Arkansas, and thereby indirectly acquire Farmers Bank & Trust Company, 
Clarksville, Arkansas.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (James M. Lyon, Vice 
President) 250 Marquette Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480:
    1. First Community Bancorp, Inc., Glasgow, Montana; to acquire 100 
percent of the voting shares of Wolf Point Acquisition Bank, Wolf 
Point, Montana, a de novo bank.
    C. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Kenneth R. Binning, 
Director, Bank Holding Company) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, 
California 94105:
    1. Westamerica Bancorporation, San Rafael, California; to merge 
with North Bay Bancorp, Novato, California, and thereby indirectly 
acquire Novato National Bank, Novato, California.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 10, 
1995.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-6475 Filed 3-15-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

VICENTE CUELLAR,

 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-18-00133-CR

Appeal from the

171st District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20160D04843)

O R D E R

The reporter’s record was initially due to be filed on August 31, 2018. The Court has 

granted four extensions of time to file the reporter’s record, most recently extending the filing 

deadline until February 27, 2019. As of this date, the reporter’s record has not been filed. 

Therefore, it is ORDERED that the trial court conduct a hearing to determine why the 

reporter’s record has not been filed, and to make appropriate findings and recommendations. The 

trial court shall forward its findings to the District Clerk of El Paso County, Texas, on or before 

March 24, 2019. The District Clerk shall prepare and forward a supplemental clerk’s record 

containing the trial court’s findings and forward the same to this Court on or before April 3, 2019. 

Further, the trial court’s reporter shall prepare, certify, and file the record of the trial court 

proceedings with this Court on or before April 3, 2019.

 

 IT IS SO ORDERED this 4

th day of March, 2019.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-41033

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

BERNARDO RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:18-CR-258-2

Before DENNIS, OWEN, and HO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Bernardo Rodriguez has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Rodriguez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the 

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 5, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-41033 Document: 00515022674 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/05/2019
No. 18-41033

2

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is 

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 18-41033 Document: 00515022674 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/05/2019
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Bobby N. LOVELADY, Appellant.

No. WD 40111.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Sept. 27, 1988.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Nov. 1, 1988.

Application to Transfer Denied Dec. 13, 1988.

Sean D. O’Brien, Public Defender, Randall J. Schlegel, Asst. Public Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before TURNAGE, P.J., and SHANGLER and MANFORD, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Direct appeal from a jury conviction for damage to property, in violation of § 569.100, RSMo 1986 and conspiracy to escape confinement, in violation of § 564.016.8(1), RSMo 1986.

*495JUDGMENT AFFIRMED. Rule 30.-25(b).
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-60507 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TONEY HOUSTON, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi

No. 2:04-CR-132-1

Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Toney Houston challenges his convictions ofconspiring to make false and fictitious oral and written statements in connection with the acquisition offireUnited States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D March 25, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 05-60507

2 arms, and aiding, abetting, and inducing another to make false statements in connection with acquisition of a firearm. He does not challenge his conviction of being a felon in possession of a firearm. Although the indictment is plainly erroneous because it fails tocharge the “intended or likely to deceive” element of 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(6), the error did not seriously affect the fairness, integrity, or public reputation ofjudicial proceedings. The evidence that the false statements were “intended or likely to deceive” was overwhelming and uncontroverted, and thejury was instructed before and at the end of trial that the government was required to prove that element beyond a reasonable doubt; the instruction largely mitigated the error. See United States v. Cotton, 535 U.S. 625, 632-34 (2002); United States v. McGilberry, 480 F.3d 326, 330-31 (5th Cir. 2007). AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 10.3

[CONFORMED
COPY]

I,
Markus Tellenbach, certify that:

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SBS Broadcasting S.A. and will be retained by SBS Broadcasting S.A. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|May 15, 2003 |  | By: | /s/MARKUS TELLENBACHMarkus Tellenbach Chief Executive Officer
|------------ |  | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------

2

---

The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,
chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 20-F or as a separate disclosure document.

3

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 31.1

Statement Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by

Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer

Regarding Facts and Circumstances Relating to Exchange Act Filings

I, Jeffrey A. Quiram, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Superconductor Technologies Inc.; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: July 22, 2016



/s/ Jeffrey A. QuiramJeffrey A. Quiram President and Chief Executive
Officer
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4701

II-VI Incorporated:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

“Made in China 2025” or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Letter Agreement



 Exhibit 10.6 
 



 
 September 11, 2008 
 Re: Scott Lang 
 To Whom it May Concern: 
 Scott Lang has been the President and Chief Executive Officer of Silver Spring Networks, Inc. for four years, since September 2004. 
 Since Scott’s employment, Silver Spring Networks has gone from an enterprise valued at approximately $30MM to $500MM, that is growing successfully and we expect this growth to continue as a result of
significant success in securing several very large, long term contracts. His stock ownership has continually increased and is now at 4.6%, which was in part a result of additional equity taken in lieu of significant cash compensation Scott would
have otherwise received in 2007. 
 Scott’s cash compensation in 2008 accurately reflects the recurring level that will continue. His total
cash compensation for 2009 is guaranteed to be at least $530,000, reflecting a base salary of $350,000 that will commence on November 1st, 2008 and a bonus of at least $180,000. 
 Sincerely, 
 Silver Spring Networks, Inc. 

 

					
	 /s/ Adam Grosser
	 		 	 /s/ Warren Weiss

	Adam Grosser	 		 	Warren Weiss
	Director	 		 	Director

 575 Broadway Street, Redwood City, California 94063
|                                                                   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                   |  |  |
|                                                              |   | Exhibit 21 |
|                                                              |   |   |
| Subsidiaries of Registrant (all 100% owed except where indicated) |
| Name of Subsidiary                                                |   | Jurisdiction of Incorporation |
| A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc (80% owned)                           |   | New York |
| Collateral Finance Corporation, Inc.                              |   | Delaware |
| A-Mark Trading A.G.                                               |   | Austria |
| Bowers and Merena Auction, LLC                                    |   | Delaware |
| Spectrum Numismatics International, Inc.                          |   | California |
| Teletrade, Inc.                                                   |   | Delaware |
| Stack's-Bower Numismatic, LLC (51% owned)                         |   | Delaware |
| H.R. Harmer Global Philatelic Network, GmbH                       |   | Germany |
| Spectrum Wine Auctions, LLC                                       |   | California |
| Corinphila Auktionen AG                                           |   | Switzerlands |
| Corinphila Veilingen BV                                           |   | The Netherlands |
| Heinrich Kohler Auktionshaus GmbH & Co. KG                    |   | Germany |
| Heinrich Kohler Briefmarkenhandel, GmbH & Co. KG              |   | Germany |
| John bull Stamp Auctions, Ltd.                                    |   | Hong Kong |
|                                                              |   |   |

----
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16** 

**- 1405** 

NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
,

Plaintiff/Counter Defendant

– Appellee
,

v.

B. DIANE TAMARIZ

- WALLACE
,

Defendant/Counter Claimant

– Appellant,

and

DIANE TAMARIZ & ASSOCIATES, P.A.; MORAN INSURANCE SERVICES, INC.; GEORGE T. MORAN, INC.; C. DAVID WALLACE,

Defendants,

and

NATIONWIDE BANK; CORRIGAN INSURANCE, INC.; WILLIAM P. CORRIGAN, JR.; C.W. HAYES, III; CHARLENE E. HARDEE; SAMUEL BRADSHAW, IV; JOHN PAUL PURSSORD,

Counter Defendants

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. J. Frederick Motz

, Senior District Judge. ( 1:09

- cv

- 00667

- JFM )

Submitted : January 27, 2017 Decided: February 16, 2017

Before SHEDD and AGEE , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.2 Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Matthew S. Grimsley, CARYN GROEDEL & ASSOCIATES CO., LPA, Cleveland, Ohio; John Singleton, SINGLETON LAW GROUP, PA, Lutherville, Maryland, for Appellant. Quintin F. Lindsmith, James P. Schuck, BRICKER & ECKLER, LLP, Columbus, Ohio; Patricia McHugh Lambert, PESSIN KATZ LAW, P.A., Towson, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:

B. Diane Tamariz

- Wallace appeals from the district court’s

order denying her motion to reopen the lawsuit between her and

Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co., which was administratively

closed after Tamariz

- Wallace filed her petition for relief in

bankruptcy. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record

on appeal and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

the district court’s order. See Providence Hall Assoc. Ltd.

P’ship v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. , 816 F.3d 273 (4th Cir . 2016).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 497 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 497

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To eliminate the COVID-19 vaccine mandate on health care providers 
    furnishing items and services under certain Federal health care 
                               programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Freedom for Health Care Workers 
Act''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATING THE COVID-19 VACCINE MANDATE ON HEALTH CARE 
              PROVIDERS FURNISHING ITEMS AND SERVICES UNDER CERTAIN 
              FEDERAL HEALTH CARE PROGRAMS.

    The Secretary of Health and Human Services may not implement, 
enforce, or otherwise give effect to the rule entitled ``Medicare and 
Medicaid Programs; Omnibus COVID-19 Health Care Staff Vaccination'' 
published by the Department of Health and Human Services on November 5, 
2021 (86 Fed. Reg. 61555) and may not promulgate any substantially 
similar rule.

            Passed the House of Representatives January 31, 2023.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
118th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 497

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To eliminate the COVID-19 vaccine mandate on health care providers 
    furnishing items and services under certain Federal health care 
                               programs.
```
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4312 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the direct payment 

requirement on the exclusion from gross income of distributions from 

governmental plans for health and long-term care insurance. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2022 

Mr. BROWN (for himself, Mr. THUNE, Mr. WARNER, and Mr. GRASSLEY) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal 

the direct payment requirement on the exclusion from 

gross income of distributions from governmental plans 

for health and long-term care insurance. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Police and Fire Health 

5 Care Protection Act of 2022’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4312 IS

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF DIRECT PAYMENT REQUIREMENT ON 

2 EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME OF DIS3 TRIBUTIONS FROM GOVERNMENTAL PLANS 

4 FOR HEALTH AND LONG-TERM CARE INSUR5 ANCE. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 402(l)(5)(A) of the Inter7 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows: 

8 ‘‘(A) DIRECT PAYMENT TO INSURER PER9 MITTED.— 

10 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) 

11 shall apply to a distribution without regard 

12 to whether payment of the premiums is 

13 made directly to the provider of the acci14 dent or health plan or qualified long-term 

15 care insurance contract by deduction from 

16 a distribution from the eligible retirement 

17 plan, or is made to the employee. 

18 ‘‘(ii) REPORTING.—In the case of a 

19 payment made to the employee as de20 scribed in clause (i), the employee shall in21 clude with the return of tax for the taxable 

22 year in which the distribution is made an 

23 attestation that the distribution does not 

24 exceed the amount paid by the employee 

25 for qualified health insurance premiums 

26 for such taxable year.’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4312 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall apply to distributions made after the 

3 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS