alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

                  Certification of Principal Financial Officer
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, Edward Lieberman, Chief Financial Officer of Phoenix Color Corp. (the
"Registrant"), certify that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 of the
Registrant ("the Report"):

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of
            the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Registrant.


/s/ Edward Lieberman
----------------------------
Edward Lieberman
November 13, 2003

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of this report.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
14812 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 53 / Monday, March 20, 1995 / Notices

1A copy of this list may be obtained by

contacting Ms. Neila Sheahan of the Office of the

General Counsel of USIA. The telephone number is

202/619–5030, and the address is Room 700, U.S.

Information Agency, 301 4th Street, SW.,

Washington, DC 20547.

Issued in Washington, DC, on March 15,

1995.

Andres Zellweger,

Director, Office of Aviation Research.

[FR Doc. 95–6782 Filed 3–17–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

UNITED STATES INFORMATION

AGENCY

Culturally Significant Objects Imported

for Exhibition; Determination

Notice is hereby given of the

following determination: Pursuant to

the authority vested in me by the Act of

October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985, 22 U.S.C.

2459), Executive Order 12047 of March

27, 1978 (43 FR 13359, March 29, 1978),

and Delegation Order No. 85–5 of June

27, 1985 (50 FR 27393, July 2, 1985), I

hereby determine that the objects in the

exhibit, ‘‘Arshile Gorky: The

Breakthrough Years’’ (see list 1)

imported from abroad for the temporary

exhibition without profit within the

United States, are of cultural

significance. These objects are imported

pursuant to loan agreements with the

foreign lenders. I also determine that the

temporary exhibition of the objects at

The National Gallery, Washington, DC,

from on or about May 7, 1995, to on or

about September 17, 1995, the AlbrightKnox Art Gallery, Buffalo, NY, from on

or about October 13, 1995, to on or

about December 31, 1995, and at the

Modern Art Museum of Fort Worth,

Forth Worth, Texas, from on or about

January 13, 1996, to on or about March

17, 1996, is in the national interest.

Public notice of this determination is

ordered to be published in the Federal

Register.

Dated: March 14, 1995.

Les Jin,

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 95–6779 Filed 3–17–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8230–01–M
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 February 20, 2015

p0217

Order 

Clerk

February 20, 2015

150956 & (29)(30)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 150956

COA: 324815

Wayne CC: 14-006308-FH

ANTHONY LAMONT JOHNSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal the January 13, 2015 order of the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented 

should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for stay is DENIED.
DENY; and Opinion Filed May 21, 2019.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-19-00294-CV

IN RE MICHEAL GEROD MCGREGOR, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F99-22740-I

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Bridges, Osborne, and Carlyle

Opinion by Justice Osborne

In this original proceeding, relator complains that the trial court has not held a hearing to 

determine whether a 1999 indictment and a 2001 indictment arose from the same offense and has 

failed to expunge the 1999 indictment. We deny the petition.

To establish a right to mandamus relief in a criminal case, the relator must show that the 

trial court violated a ministerial duty and there is no adequate remedy at law. In re State ex rel. 

Weeks, 391 S.W.3d 117, 122 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013) (orig. proceeding). As the party seeking 

relief, the relator has the burden of providing the Court with a sufficient mandamus record to 

establish his right to mandamus relief. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992) (orig. 

proceeding). Rules 52.3 and 52.7 require the relator to provide “a certified or sworn copy” of 

certain documents, including any order complained of, any other document showing the matter 

complained of, and every document that is material to the relator’s claim for relief that was filed 

in any underlying proceeding. TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(k)(1)(A), 52.7(a)(1). 
–2–

Here, relator has not filed an appendix or mandamus record. The petition is insufficient to 

establish that a petition for expunction or any motion regarding the 1999 and 2001 indictments 

was properly filed and timely presented and that the trial court was asked to rule but failed to do 

so within a reasonable time. As such, relator has not established a violation of a ministerial duty 

and is not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a) (the court must deny the petition if the court determines 

relator is not entitled to the relief sought).

190294F.P05

/Leslie Osborne/

LESLIE OSBORNE

JUSTICE
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3683

CW Bearing USA, Inc:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
[CONFORMED COPY]

Exhibit 4.63

Seventh Amendment to Common Stock Purchase Agreement

by and between

ZeniMax Media Inc.

and

SBS Broadcasting S.A.

March 26, 2003

---

Seventh Amendment to Common Stock Purchase Agreement

This Seventh Amendment to Common Stock Purchase Agreement (the "Seventh Amendment") is made as of this
26th day of March 2003, to amend the Common Stock Purchase Agreement dated October 30, 2000, as modified by a First Amendment dated May 15, 2001, a Second Amendment
dated June 14, 2001, a Third Amendment dated April 16, 2002, a Fourth Amendment dated June 6, 2002, a Fifth Amendment dated September 27, 2002, and a Sixth Amendment dated
December 20, 2002 (the "Agreement") by and between ZeniMax Media Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), and SBS Broadcasting S.A., a Luxembourg corporation (the "Purchaser" or
"SBS").

In
consideration of the representations, warranties and covenants in the Agreement and for other good and valuable consideration, the Company and SBS hereby agree as follows:

The
parties agree that all other terms and conditions set forth in the Agreement remain in full force and effect.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Seventh Amendment as of the day and year first above written.

| |  | COMPANY:          
| |  | ------------------
| |  | ZENIMAX MEDIA INC.
| |  | By:               
| |  | Name:             
| |  | Title:            

| |  | Address: | 1370 Piccard Drive,
Suite 120
Rockville, MD 20850
| |  | -------- | -------------------------------------------------

2

---

| |  | PURCHASER:           
| |  | ---------------------
| |  | SBS Broadcasting S.A.
| |  | By:                  
| |  | Name:                
| |  | Title:               

| |  | Address: | SBS Broadcasting S.A.
8-10 rue Mathias Hardt
BP 39
L-2010
Luxembourg                                     
| |  | -------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | Copy to: | SBS Services B.V.
Quintet Office Park
Rietlandpark 353
1019EM Amsterdam
Holland
Attn: Corporate Secretary

3

---

QuickLinks
**Exhibit 99.4**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO****18 U.S.C. 1350****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

March  28, 2003

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K by Pillowtex Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the“Company”), for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2002 (the “Report”), as filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the undersigned, Michael R. Harmon, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, doeshereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to such officer’s knowledge:

(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78mor 78o(d)); and

(2)       The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the date first above written.

 

|   |   |   |                                             |
|--------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------|
|        |   |   | /s/ MICHAEL R. HARMON                            |
|   |   |   |                                                  |
|   |   |   | **Michael R. Harmon****Chief Financial Officer** |
#### Terry Ray ADAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 40739.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Jan. 17, 1989.

Jeffrey J. Rosanswank, Public Defender, Craig A. Johnston, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before FENNER, P.J., and MANFORD and GAITAN, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from denial of Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PAYLESS
SHOESOURCE, INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EARNINGS FOR THE 39 WEEKS
ENDED OCTOBER 30, 1999, AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF OCTOBER
30, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-30-1999
<CASH>                                         210,700<F1>
<SECURITIES>                                         0<F2>
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,700<F3>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F3>
<INVENTORY>                                    359,400
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               606,000
<PP&E>                                         956,900
<DEPRECIATION>                                 469,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,118,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          218,100
<BONDS>                                        126,300<F4>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           300
<OTHER-SE>                                     725,000<F5>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,118,700
<SALES>                                      2,126,200<F6>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,126,200
<CGS>                                        1,438,300
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,438,300
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (200)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                201,600
<INCOME-TAX>                                    80,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            121,200
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   121,200
<EPS-BASIC>                                       3.84<F7>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.82<F7>
<FN>
<F1>Includes cash equivalent securities.
<F2>Any "securities" are shown under "Cash".
<F3>Receivables are net after deduction of allowances.
<F4>Consists of Capital Lease Obligations plus Long-Term Debt.
<F5>Reflects Retained Earnings and Additional Paid In Capital.
<F6>Reflects net sales.
<F7>Expressed in dollars.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Killbuck Bancshares, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Diane Knowles, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Diane S. Knowles   
|    |  | Diane S. Knowles       
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer
|    |  | November 14, 2007      

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Killbuck Bancshares,
Inc. and will be retained by Killbuck Bancshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2835

Speck Pumps-Pool Products, Inc: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions.

pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 48 (Monday, March 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13483-13484]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6066]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50-305]


Wisconsin Public Service Corp., Wisconsin Power and Light Co. 
Madison Gas and Electric Co.; Notice of Withdrawal of Application for 
Amendment to Facility Operating License

    The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has granted 
the request of Wisconsin Public Service Corporation, Wisconsin Power 
and Light Company, and Madison Gas and Electric Company, (the licensee) 
to withdraw its application dated April 21, 1994, for a proposed 
amendment to Facility Operating License No. DPR-43 [[Page 13484]] for 
the Kewaunee Nuclear Power Plant, located in Kewaunee County, 
Wisconsin.
    The proposed amendment would have modified the facility technical 
specifications by adding requirements for the steam exclusion system.
    The Commission had previously issued a Notice of Consideration of 
Issuance of Amendment published in the Federal Register on August 3, 
1994 (59 FR 39600). However, by letter dated February 27, 1995, the 
licensee withdrew the proposed change.
    For further details with respect to this action, see the 
application for amendment dated April 21, 1994, and the licensee's 
letter dated February 27, 1995, which withdrew the application for 
license amendment. The above documents are available for public 
inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room, 2120 L Street, 
NW., Washington, DC 20555, and at the local public document room 
located at the University of Wisconsin Library Learning Center, 2420 
Nicolet Drive, Green Bay, Wisconsin 53401.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 7th day of March 1995.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Richard J. Laufer,
Project Manager, Project Directorage III-3, Division of Reactor 
Projects--III/IV Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 95-6066 Filed 3-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2371

KEMET Electronics Corporation: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions.

pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXHIBIT
32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification






Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of China Aoxing
Pharmaceutical Company, Inc. (the “Company”) certifies that:




1.           The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period  ended
March 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and




2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









May
      15, 2009
                /s/ Juan Yue HanJuan
      Yue Han, Chief Executive OfficerMay
      15, 2009
                /s/ Hongyue HaoHongyue
      Hao, Chief Financial
Officer




---
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4432

Valmet, Inc: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel