alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2749

Braeburn Systems LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions.

pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 28, 2012

h0321 

# Order

March 28, 2012

143121-2 & (15)

TIMOTHY CARLSON, RANDALL and LINDA KOLODZIEJSKI, WILLIAM and BEVERLY GLASSON, DAVID and KRISTIN ABRA HAM, DENNIS D. MARLOWE, DENNIS and TRACY HIGHT, TED DOBEK, CAROLYN KUPIEC, FREDERICK and MICHELLE CROSS, SANDRA POWERS, DANIEL G. OLIVARES, FRANCESCO and PAMELA SIMONE, GARY POTA PSHYN, GERALD KOWALSKI, and FRANK VITALE, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v SC: 143121-2 COA: 299577; 299587 CITY OF WARREN, Ma comb CC: 2 000-01823-CZ Defendant-Appellant.

___________________ _________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for miscellaneous relief is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the April 29, 2011 and May 2, 2011 orders of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration, as on leave granted, of the issue raised in Court of Ap peals Docket No. 299577 , whether any of the class members’ claims are barred by the thre e-year period of limitation set forth in MCL 600.5805(10); and the issue ra ised in Court of Appeals Do cket No. 299587, whether the defendant has a due process righ t to defend against the plaintiffs’ individual claims of causation and damages in this class actio n and/or whether there are due process implications to the process of statistical “extrapolation” to be drawn from the testimony of the plaintiffs’ expert witn esses. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the re maining questions pres ented should now be reviewed by this Court.

C AVANAGH

, J., not participating due to a fami lial relationship with counsel of

record.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
financial statements for the six months ended June 30, 2000, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,077
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,077
<PP&E>                                           3,039
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,116
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,304
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,600
<OTHER-SE>                                     (5,788)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,116
<SALES>                                          2,966
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,966
<CGS>                                              565
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      565
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,705
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,304)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,304)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,304)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-01-1998
<CASH>                                           1,560
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,753
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,038
<PP&E>                                       1,388,582
<DEPRECIATION>                                 625,319
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 790,756
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          106,748
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     106,128
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   790,756
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               169,285
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                50,030
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              57,908
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 60,374
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    60,374
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
TransAKT Ltd.: Exhibit 10.3 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com






FINDER’S FEE AGREEMENT

THIS AGREEMENT is entered into 15th Day of May, 2008
by and between:

TransAKT Ltd. (“the Corporation”), a company incorporated
under
 the laws of Alberta with offices at Suite 260, 1414 8th
Street SW, 
Calgary, Alberta, T2R 1J6.

- and -

Christian Nielsen (the "Consultant"), an employee of
TransAKT Ltd. residing at 
109 Evansbrooke Way N.W., Calgary, Alberta, T3G
1C8.

WHEREAS the Corporation requires approximately US$100,000 in
additional working capital for its business operations;

AND WHEREAS the Board of Directors of the Corporation intends
to borrow funds by entering into promissory note agreements;

AND WHEREAS the Consultant has represented to the Corporation
that he can provide valuable services to the Corporation by assisting it to
successfully complete its' offering;

AND WHEREAS the Corporation and the Consultant therefore wish
to enter into this agreement to provide for the delivery of services to the
Corporation and the compensation of the Consultant, on the terms set out
below.

	1. 	
      The Consultant will assist the Corporation in its efforts
      to successfully borrow funds through the issuance of promissory note
      agreements.

	 	 
	2. 	
      A fee (the "Fee") will be payable by the Corporation to
      the Consultant with respect to any financing obtained for the Corporation
      as a direct result of the services provided by the Consultant.

	 	 
	3. 	
      The Fee payable to the Consultant will be equal to 10% of
      the principal amount of loans received as a direct result of the services
      provided by the Consultant, and the Fee shall be payable by the issuance
      of common shares of the Corporation with a deemed value per share equal to
      those offered in the private placement.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF this Agreement has been executed as of the
day, month and year first above written.

TransAKT Ltd.

	Per: 	/s/James Wu 	 	/s/Christian Nielsen 	 
	  	James Wu, President 	 	Christian Nielsen
| | Exhibit 32.1
| | ------------

Certification
of Chief Executive Officerof Prime Medical Services, Inc.

|This certification is provided
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the annual
report on Form 10-K (the Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003
of Prime Medical Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Issuer).
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (i) | the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section
               15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated:  February 26, 2004.

| | /s/ Brad A. Hummel

Brad A. Hummel
President and Chief Executive Officer
Prime Medical Services, Inc.
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being
filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in the typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by
Section 906, has been provided to the Issuer and will be retained by the Issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Marlowe Tate, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (James Leff, J., at suppression hearing, trial and sentence), rendered May 22, 1987, which convicted defendant of robbery in the second degree and sentenced him, as a predicate felon, to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 6 to 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

We reject defendant’s claim that the officers acted improperly in detaining him while seeking further information concerning a radio run that a robbery had taken place. The officer’s initial stop and inquiry of defendant and codefendant was concededly proper. When the men indicated that they did not know one another (given that the response was contrary to the officers’ observations of them engaged in conversation and one passing to the other a token) and indicated that they had come from the place where the robbery had taken place, the officers acted within their authority in prolonging the detention to make further inquiry. *(People v Hicks,*68 NY2d 234; *People v Wheeler,*61 AD2d 737.) Thus, the short detention of defendant and codefendant in the subway station, while one officer left the station to radio for more information, was not unreasonable.

*230Defendant’s *pro se*arguments, to the extent preserved, have been reviewed and deemed meritless. We do not reach his challenge to the court’s identification or circumstantial evidence charge, since there was no objection to the instructions as issued, thereby leaving the claim unpreserved for review (CPL 470.05 [2]). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Wallach, Smith and Rubin, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-6416

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CHRISTOPHER JERMAINE TAYLOR, a/k/a Phoenix, a/k/a C-Murda.

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at 

Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (3:15-cr-00009-1)

Submitted: August 24, 2021 Decided: August 27, 2021

Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher Jermaine Taylor, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Jermaine Taylor appeals the district court’s order denying Taylor’s 18 

U.S.C. § 3583(e)(2) motion to modify the terms of his supervised release. After reviewing 

the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying 

Taylor’s motion. See United States v. Trimble, 969 F.3d 853, 856 (8th Cir. 2020) (stating 

standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT ON REMAND

Thomas Elijah Atkins, * From the 91st District Court

of Eastland County,

Trial Court No. 24281.

Vs. No. 11-19-00355-CR * July 8, 2021

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Williams, J.

(Panel consists of: Trotter, J.,

Williams, J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

sitting by assignment)

(Bailey, C.J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is 

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

we modify the judgment of the trial court to delete the fine of $2,000 and the time 

payment fee of $25, and we affirm the judgment as modified.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4094

Scosche Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of SAFER RESIDENCE CORPORATION (the Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report"), I, Melissa Blanchard, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Melissa Blanchard

---------------------------

Date: June 27, 2005                      Melissa Blanchard

Principal Financial Officer
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4154

Tianhai Electric North America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
FIRST SUPPLEMENT

                          DATED AUGUST 14, 2000 TO THE

                    CONFIDENTIAL PRIVATE PLACEMENT MEMORANDUM

                               DATED JUNE 23, 2000

           Fayetteville Lithotripters Limited Partnership - Arizona I

                  Fayetteville Lithotripters Limited Partnership - Arizona I, an
Arizona limited partnership (the "Partnership"), by this First Supplement hereby
amends and supplements its Confidential Private Placement Memorandum of June 23,
2000 (the "Memorandum"). Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined
have the meanings provided in the Memorandum. Persons who have subscribed for or
are  considering  an investment in the Units  offered by the  Memorandum  should
carefully review this First Supplement.

Extension of the Offering

                  Pursuant to the authority  given to the General Partner in the
Memorandum,  the General  Partner  hereby  elects to extend the Closing  Date to
February 9, 2000 (or such earlier  date as the General  Partner may, in its sole
discretion, otherwise elect).

                  Questions  concerning this First Supplement should be directed
to James Brady or Phil Gallina at 1-800-682-7971, Extension 3.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3905

Helen of Troy:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn