alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4951 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4951

To make technical corrections relating to the Justice Against Sponsors 
                           of Terrorism Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 26, 2023

      Mr. Van Drew (for himself, Mr. Nadler, Ms. Malliotakis, Mr. 
Fitzpatrick, Mr. Gimenez, Mr. Kean of New Jersey, Mr. LaLota, Mr. Davis 
of North Carolina, Mr. Goldman of New York, Mr. Nehls, Mr. Lawler, Mr. 
 Gottheimer, Mr. Pallone, Mr. Lamborn, Mr. Ryan, Mr. Tony Gonzales of 
   Texas, Mr. Santos, Ms. Meng, Mr. Roy, Ms. Clarke of New York, Mr. 
D'Esposito, and Mr. Garbarino) introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To make technical corrections relating to the Justice Against Sponsors 
                           of Terrorism Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ensuring Justice for Victims of 
Terrorism Act''.

SEC. 2. FOREIGN STATES.

    Section 1605B(c) of title 28, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting ``2333(d)(1) or'' after ``Notwithstanding section''.

SEC. 3. EXECUTION OF JUDGMENTS.

    Section 1610 of title 28, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(7), by striking ``section 1605A or 
        section 1605(a)(7) (as such section was in effect on January 
        27, 2008)'' and inserting ``section 1605(a)(7) (as in effect on 
        January 27, 2008), 1605A, or 1605B''; and
            (2) in subsection (b)(3), by striking ``by virtue of 
        section 1605A of this chapter or section 1605(a)(7) of this 
        chapter (as such section was in effect on January 27, 2008)'' 
        and inserting ``under section 1605(a)(7) (as in effect on 
        January 27, 2008), 1605A, or 1605B''.

SEC. 4. DEFINITION OF NATIONAL OF THE UNITED STATES.

    Section 2331(2) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting ``, and including, for purposes of section 2333, any entity 
organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction 
within the United States'' before the semicolon at the end.

SEC. 5. APPLICABILITY.

    The amendments made by this Act shall apply to any civil action 
pending on, or commenced on or after, the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 52 (Friday, March 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 14430]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6557]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Science Board Task Force on Joint Technology Issues

ACTION: Notice of advisory committee meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board Task Force on Joint Technology 
Issues will meet in closed session on March 27, 1995 at the Pentagon, 
Arlington, Virginia.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense through the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and 
Technology on scientific and technical matters as they affect the 
perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At this meeting the Task 
Force will work with the JCS Chairman and Vice Chairman in support of 
the Expanded JROC activities. The Task Force should place special 
emphasis on the application of technology to enhance the effectiveness 
of the evolving force structure within tight fiscal constraints and 
should also place a special focus on issue dealing with operations 
other than war.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended P(5 U.S.C. Aapp. II, (1988)), it has 
been determined that this DSB Task Force meeting, concerns matters 
listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1)(1988), and that accordingly this meeting 
will be closed to the public.

    Dated: March 13, 1995.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 95-6557 Filed 3-16-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 8 (Thursday, January 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 2969]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-768]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
E. Ross Harris; Change in Bank Control Notice


Acquisition of Shares of Banks or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificant listed below has applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on notices are set forth in 
paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notice is available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. Once the notice has been accepted for 
processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices of 
the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in 
writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for the notice or to the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than 
February 6, 1995.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (Genie D. Short, Vice President) 
2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. E. Ross Harris, George West, Texas; to acquire an additional 
1.74 percent, for a total of 11.65 percent, of the voting shares of 
Live Oak Bancshares Corporation, George West, Texas, and thereby 
indirectly acquire First National Bank, George West, Texas.
    In connection with this proposal, E. Ross Harris, Thomas J. Martin, 
Jr., and Joseph R. Schruder have applied as voting representatives for 
a voting and stock restriction agreement to control 66 percent of the 
outstanding shares of Live Oak Bancshares Corporation.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 6, 
1995.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-768 Filed 1-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**STATEMENTOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the “Form 10-Q”) ofCardinal Financial Corporation, I, Bernard H. Clineburg, Chairman, Presidentand Chief Executive Officer, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to my knowledge:

 

(a)                                  theForm 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(b)                                 the information contained in the Form10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financialcondition and results of operations of the Company and its subsidiaries as of, andfor, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.

 

 
| Date:   May 9, 2005 |   /s/ Bernard H. Clineburg             |   |
|--------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                     | Bernard H. Clineburg                             |
|                     | Chairman, President and Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 57 (Friday, March 24, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 15624]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7424]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

Time and Date: 10:00 a.m., Wednesday, March 29, 1995.

Place: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, C Street 
entrance between 20th and 21st Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered:

    1. Proposed acquisition of computer equipment within the Federal 
Reserve System. (This item was originally announced for a closed 
meeting on March 27, 1995.)
    2. Proposed acquisition of computer equipment within the Federal 
Reserve System.
    3. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal 
Reserve System employees.
    4. Any items carried forward from a previously announced 
meeting.

Contact Person for More Information: Mr. Joseph R. Coyne, Assistant to 
the Board; (202) 452-3204. You may call (202) 452-3207, beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before this meeting, for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting.

    Dated: March 22, 1995.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-7424 Filed 3-22-95; 10:05 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-3863

HoMedics USA LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2586

Primex Family of Companies:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
#### T. W. DANIEL v. TALLASSEE POWER COMPANY.

(Filed 18 November, 1931.)

Appeal and Error G c — Appeal will be dismissed where no briefs have been filed.

Where neither party has filed a brief the appeal will be dismissed.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Warlich, J.,*at September Term, 1931, of DAVIDSON.

*Phillips & Bower and J. M. Daniel, Jr., for plaintiff.*

*Raper & Raper and R. L. Smith & Sons for defendant.*

Pee, Oubiam.

This is a companion ease to *J. M. Daniel v. Tallassee Power Company, ante,*680. The complaints in the two cases are similar, with like judgments entered in the Superior Court.

No briefs have been filed by either side, for which reason the appeal will be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2002, of Synagro Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"), as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J.
Paul Withrow, certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company and that the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.


                                                /s/ J. Paul Withrow
                                                -------------------------------
                                                J. Paul Withrow,
                                                Chief Financial Officer
                                                March 21, 2003
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3677

JLG Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
2013 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

5-8-2013

Gerald Gesiorski v. Branch Banking & Trust Co

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 12-2900

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2013

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2013 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Gerald Gesiorski v. Branch Banking & Trust Co" (2013). 2013 Decisions. Paper 853.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2013/853
NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

__________

No. 12-2900

__________

GERALD GESIORSKI; DAWN GESIORSKI; LIL' BIT OF CHICACO, INC.,

 Appellants

v.

BRANCH BANKING & TRUST COMPANY, f/k/a Carrol County Bank & Trust

__________

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. No. 1-12-cv-00449)

District Judge: Honorable John E. Jones, III

Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)

April 23, 2013

BEFORE: SLOVITER, JORDAN, and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges

(Filed: May 8, 2013 )

__________

OPINION OF THE COURT

__________

NYGAARD, Circuit Judge.

Gerald and Dawn Gesiorski, and Lil’ Bit of Chicago, Inc. appeal the District 

Court’s grant of a motion to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) brought by Branch 
2

Banking & Trust Company. Appellants argue that the District Court erred by dismissing 

their claim for statutory damages under the Pennsylvania Mortgage Satisfaction Act. 21 

P.S. § 721-6(d).1 We will affirm. 

There is no dispute that Appellants failed to pay the full mortgage obligation prior 

to foreclosure, making it impossible for them to prove “payment of the entire mortgage 

obligation and all required satisfaction and recording costs.” 21 P.S. § 721-6(d). 

Appellants argue that the debt was constructively discharged under the Pennsylvania 

Deficiency Judgment Act (42 Pa.C.S. § 8103(b)), but there is no legal authority for the 

proposition that constructive discharge of the debt equates to “payment” of the mortgage 

for purposes of the Mortgage Satisfaction Act. Therefore, appellants could not and did 

not state a claim for damages under the referenced section of the Mortgage Satisfaction 

Act “that is plausible on its face.” Jones v. ABN Amro Mortgage Group, Inc., 606 F.3d 

119, 123 (3d Cir. 2010) (quoting Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)). The 

District Court did not err. 

For these reasons we will affirm the order of the District Court dismissing the 

claim with prejudice. 

 

1 Appellants did not appeal the denial of its claims for liquidated damages and attorney’s 

fees.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           6,869
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                13,500
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     35,315
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          29,774
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            30,389
<LOANS>                                        141,291
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,901
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 232,466
<DEPOSITS>                                     192,845
<SHORT-TERM>                                     2,835
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                516
<LONG-TERM>                                      8,186
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,847
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,237
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 232,466
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  3,135
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  905
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   115
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 4,155
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,875
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,036
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,199
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       60
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,255
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    959
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         959
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       730
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.03
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.94
<LOANS-NON>                                         99
<LOANS-PAST>                                       316
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,851
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       35
<RECOVERIES>                                        25
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,901
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,867
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             34
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
13.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. §1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









In connection with the Annual Report of
Lorus Therapeutics Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ended May
31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), I, Aiping H. Young, President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:




1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.









Date:
November 26, 2008


/s/ Aiping H.
Young


Aiping
H. Young


President
and Chief Executive Officer