alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
I, Jeffrey S. Stone, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Tweeter Home Entertainment Group, Inc.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and 5.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonable likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: February 9, 2005   /s/ Jeffrey S. Stone   President and Chief Executive Officer
----

|                                                                                                                                                                                               | Exhibit      32 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                               |
| Certification      of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  |

| 1)     | The      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Operating Partnership for the period      ended June 30, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the      requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15      U.S.C. 78m); and |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
| 2)     | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Operating Partnership.                                                                           |

|   |    / S / Robert      J.      Attea                          Robert      J. AtteaChairman      of the BoardChief      Executive Officer of Sovran Holdings, Inc., the Sole General Partner of      the Operating Partnership |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |      / S / David      L.      Rogers                        David      L. RogersChief      Financial Officer of Sovran Holdings, Inc., the Sole General Partner of      the Operating Partnership                           |

----
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3724

SPM Flow Control, Inc. DBA Weir SPM:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
#### Pat S. HOLLOWAY v. The FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS.

No. C-7865.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Dec. 7, 1988.

An order of the Fifth Court of Appeals dated November 28, 1988, remanding a related cause to the trial court, being contrary to the Supreme Court’s stay order of October 12, 1988, the Fifth Court of Appeals is ordered to vacate its order of November 28, 1988, and to stay all proceedings in that cause until further order of this Court.
Order filed October 18, 2012.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 12

- 00155

- CV

____________ ROBERT FIELDS AND JO HN FIELDS, CO

- INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR S OF

THE ESTATE OF JAMES R. FIELDS, DECEASED , Appellants

V.
MARY ELIZABETH LEE FIELDS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 190th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2011

- 52159



### O R D E R
On April 12, 2012, this court abated this case for mediation. On June 26, 2012, the mediator reported that the case had settled in mediation. On September 13, 2012, this court sent correspondence to the parties requesting a dispositive motion or motion t o dismiss. As of today, the parties have not responded.
Appellant’s brief was due July 13, 2012

. No brief or motion for extension of time has been filed.Unless appellant submits a brief to the clerk of this court on or before November

15, 2012 , the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND THE RELATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND
THE NOTES THERETO, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          63,631
<SECURITIES>                                   210,782
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,632
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     12,938
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               343,506
<PP&E>                                         113,509
<DEPRECIATION>                                (20,176)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 883,474
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           87,581
<BONDS>                                        287,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            44
<OTHER-SE>                                     441,695
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   883,474
<SALES>                                        231,776
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               301,426
<CGS>                                           45,839
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  252,369
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,175
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 44,448
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,444
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             30,004
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    30,004
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.66


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 55 (Wednesday, March 22, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 15072-15073]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7013]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
50 CFR Part 672

[Docket No. 950206041-5041-01; I.D. 031695B]


Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska; Pacific Cod for Processing by 
the Inshore Component in the Western Regulatory Area

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Closure.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS is closing the directed fishery for Pacific cod by 
vessels catching Pacific cod for processing by the inshore component in 
the Western Regulatory Area of the Gulf of Alaska (GOA). This action is 
necessary to prevent exceeding the allocation of Pacific cod for the 
inshore component in this area.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 12 noon, Alaska local time (A.l.t.), March 17, 1995, 
until 12 midnight, A.l.t., December 31, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew N. Smoker, 907-586-7228.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The groundfish fishery in the GOA exclusive 
[[Page 15073]] economic zone is managed by NMFS according to the 
Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska (FMP) 
prepared by the North Pacific Fishery Management Council under 
authority of the Magnuson Fishery Conservation and Management Act. 
Fishing by U.S. vessels is governed by regulations implementing the FMP 
at 50 CFR parts 620 and 672.
    In accordance with Sec. 672.20(c)(1)(ii)(B), the allocation of 
Pacific cod for the inshore component in the Western Regulatory Area 
was established by the final groundfish specifications (60 FR 8470, 
February 14, 1995) as 18,090 metric tons (mt).
    The Director, Alaska Region, NMFS (Regional Director), has 
determined, in accordance with Sec. 672.20(c)(2)(ii), that the 
allocation of Pacific cod total allowable catch for the inshore 
component in the Western Regulatory Area soon will be reached. The 
Regional Director established a directed fishing allowance of 13,090 
mt, with consideration that 5,000 mt will be taken as incidental catch 
in directed fishing for other species in the Western Regulatory Area. 
The Regional Director has determined that the directed fishing 
allowance has been reached. Consequently, NMFS is prohibiting directed 
fishing for Pacific cod by operators of vessels catching Pacific cod 
for processing by the inshore component in the Western Regulatory Area.
    Directed fishing standards for applicable gear types may be found 
in the regulations at Sec. 672.20(g).

Classification

    This action is taken under 50 CFR 672.20 and is exempt from review 
under E.O. 12866.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: March 16, 1995.
David S. Crestin,
Acting Director, Office of Fisheries Conservation and Management, 
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 95-7013 Filed 3-17-95; 3:58 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
5033 Belleville Rd. Canton, MI 48188

Advanced Magnet 

Source Corporation

-- HTS 8505.90.4000

 Request for Exclusion 

 Magnet Components and their 

 Applications

1
Company Overview

5033 Belleville Rd. Canton, MI 48188

2

 Established in 2006 

 Located at 5033 Belleville Road, Canton, Michigan, USA

 Warehouse in Michigan: 14,000 square feet

 2017 Annual Sales: US$ 11 million

 Certified MBE by National Minority Supplier Development Council 
Magnet Assembly & Components

5033 Belleville Rd. Canton, MI 48188

1

Our magnet component are 

comprised of NdFeB 

permanent magnets and 

steel cups, channels and 

plastic inserts for some 

applications.

All our magnets are licensed material, and 

manufactured by facilities certified by ISO9001:-

Fm536248, & IATF16949:536720
Magnet Assemblies & Components

AMSC offers a variety of applications, including automotive 

applications, magnetic base, brass sleeved magnets, and 

magnetic channel that is widely used for squaring, leveling, 

guiding, partitions, displays, paint/plating racks, jigs, and 

continuous processing lines. 

With our experience and expertise in magnetic industry, we 

can also customize a wide range of magnetic assemblies and 

components.

5033 Belleville Rd. Canton, MI 48188 Tel: 734-398-7188; email: yufang.shi@me.com

4
Pot Magnets – disc magnet

Pot magnets made of a steel cup and a disc shape 

magnets. They are suitable as cup magnets, 

magnet base, outdoor attachments and for many 

other applications. 

5033 Belleville Rd. Canton, MI 48188 Tel: 734-398-7188; email: yufang.shi@me.com

5
Pot Magnets – ring magnet

Cup magnets made of a steel cup and a ring shape magnets. They are 

widely used for automotive application as headliner magnets hold the 

roof to the top (low left), and electric wire holder for construction (low 

right) and etc. 

5033 Belleville Rd. Canton, MI 48188 Tel: 734-398-7188; email: yufang.shi@me.com

6
Channel Magnets – rectangular magnet

Same as previous page. 

5033 Belleville Rd. Canton, MI 48188 Tel: 734-398-7188; email: yufang.shi@me.com

7
Customer Part Numbers

Customer Part Numbers to Identify Product:

PN 62411

PN 62417(62455+82007B

PN 62455

PN 82004B

PN 82004S

PN 82007B

PN BRM4T125

PN MAG4TF

5033 Belleville Rd. Canton, MI 48188 Tel: 734-398-7188; email: yufang.shi@me.com

8
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3314

CW Bearing USA, Inc:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
PUBLIC VERSION Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
$[*********] [******]

$[*********]

INPUT

20.0

$[*********]

[******]

[******]

0.05

PUBLIC VERSION
Consistent with USTR's Section 301 notice, OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. requests

confidential treatment for the information designated as business confidential in this submission. Such

information consists of information that would not customarily be released to the public, including

business or trade secrets regarding production costs and processes, data on sales, product characteristics

customers, destinations, and other product, sales, and cost-related business secrets. Business confidential

information has been indicated herein by enclosing it in single brackets (“[ ]”). A public version of these

comments is also being filed with all confidential information removed.

OMRON in the US is the only designer of this product and only supplier of this component.

CASE IMMOBILIZER is a molded plastic switch housing, and is used only for automotive purposes, of

which is an OEM-specified dimension. It is only used for further assembly of components which go into

domestic automobile production, which is specified by auto manufacturer.

This product is not a target of the US Administration's 301 investigation regarding Intellectual Property

concerns. This is not a concern to IP transfer and impressment. This product contains no IP of interest

related to autonomous vehicle production.

The tariff action ultimately poses a risk of significant damage to OMRON, the domestic automobile

industry, and ultimately the US consumer as a increase in price. Like in the case of similar approvals for

vehicle components at the HTS level, OMRON views this product in the same manner. Immediate

movement of production to a US manufacturer or another country would pose significant re-tooling

costs, significant amounts of time, and approvals pertaining to consumer automobile safety standards are

costly and would take a significant amount of time to obtain.

OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. believes that CBP can easily exclude the CASE

IMMOBILIZER in question based solely on the product description. The following are draft CBP

exclusion instructions:

"CASE IMMOBILIZER circular housing with a raised surface encircling the circumference, a plastic

five-sided clip at the 3 o'clock position on the diameter of the circular housing extending appx back 90

degrees from the surface orientation; and a plastic rectangular connector housing extending appx back

90degrees from the surface orientation of the circular housing Plastic Case; Made of resin 46.00 mm X

61.00 mm X 48.00 mm"

This information will be contained on the invoice from the supplier.

PUBLIC VERSION
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 55 (Wednesday, March 22, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15194]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6967]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Indian Gaming

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of approval for Tribal-State compact.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 2710, of the Indian Gaming Regulatory 
Act of 1988 (Pub. L. 100-497), the Secretary of the Interior shall 
publish, in the Federal Register, notice of approved Tribal-State 
Compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III (casino) gambling on 
Indian reservations. The Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs, 
Department of the Interior, through her delegated authority, has 
approved the Tribal-State Compact For Regulation of Class III Gaming 
Between the Siletz Indian Tribe and the State of Oregon, which was 
executed on November 14, 1994.

DATES: This action is effective March 22, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George T. Skibine, Director, Indian 
Gaming Management Staff, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Washington, D.C. 
20240, (202) 219-4068.

    Dated: March 14, 1995.
Ada E. Deer,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 95-6967 Filed 3-21-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-02-P
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**IN THE INTEREST OF: C.R., A MINOR**

**PETITION OF: C.R., A MINOR :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 352 MAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 14th day of October, 2015, the Petition for A llowance of Appeal** 

**is** DENIED

**.**
Exhibit 10.13
 THIRD AMENDMENT
TO
LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT
 THIRD AMENDMENT
 Recitals
 A.
 B.
 C.
 D.
 Agreement
 Now, Therefore,
 1. Definitions.
 2. Amendments to Loan Agreement.
 2.1 Section 17 (Term and Termination).




---



##### 



3. Limitation of Amendments.
 3.1 Section 2
 3.2
 4. Representations and Warranties.
 4.1
 4.2
 4.3
 4.4
 4.5
 4.6




---



##### 



4.7
 5 Integration.
 6. Counterparts.
 7. Effectiveness.




---



##### 



In Witness Whereof,
 BANK
    
    
    
    BORROWERSilicon Valley Bank
    
    
    
    Superconductor Technologies, Inc.By:
    
    /s/  John Willard
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Jeffrey QuiramName:
    
    John Willard
    
    
    
    
    
    Name:
    
    Jeffrey QuiramTitle:
    
    VP/SVB
    
    
    
    
    
    Title:
    
    President and CEO




---



##### 



Schedule 1
 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENT
AND REAFFIRMATION OF GUARANTY
 Section 1.
 Section 2.
 Section 3.
  GUARANTOR
    Conductus, Inc.By:
    /s/ Jeffrey QuiramName:
    Jeffrey QuiramTitle:
    President and CEO