alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 56 (Thursday, March 23, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15306]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7175]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993; National Information Infrastructure Testbed

    Noticeis hereby given that, on August 9, 1994, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the National Information 
Infrastructure Testbed (``NIIT'') has filed written notification 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in membership. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the 
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of 
the additional members of NIIT are: California Institute of Technology, 
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA; Center for the New West, 
Denver, CO; Concurrent Technologies, Johnstown, PA; Entergy Services, 
Inc., New Orleans, LA; Hitachi Telecom, Inc., Norcross, GA; Hughes 
Aircraft Corporation, Los Angeles, CA; Intel Corporation, Hillsboro, 
OR; MCNC, Research Triangle Park, NC; Methodist Health Network of Iowa, 
Des Moines, IA; Microelectronics & Computer Technology Corporation, 
Austin, TX; PeerLogic, Inc., San Francisco, CA; Polaroid Corporation, 
Cambridge, MA; University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI; 
and University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
    No other changes have been made in the membership, nature and 
objectives of the consortium. Membership in NIIT remains open, and the 
consortium intends to file additional written notifications disclosing 
all changes in membership.
    On December 7, 1993, NIIT filed its original notification pursuant 
to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a 
notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on 
May 18, 1994 (59 Fed. Reg. 25960).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on April 26, 
1994. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on June 23, 1994 (59 FR 32463).
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 95-7175 Filed 3-22-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 55 (Wednesday, March 22, 1995)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 15227]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7259]




[[Page 15225]]

_______________________________________________________________________

Part IX





The President





_______________________________________________________________________



Presidential Determination No. 95-16--Determination Pursuant to Section 
2(c)(1) of the Migration and Refugee Assistance Act of 1962, as Amended


                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 22, 1995 / 
Presidential Documents

____________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President  
[[Page 15227]] 


                Presidential Determination No. 95-16 of March 13, 1995

                Determination Pursuant to Section 2(c)(1) of the 
                Migration and Refugee Assistance Act of 1962, as 
                Amended

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                Pursuant to section 2(c)(1) of the Migration and 
                Refugee Assistance Act of 1962, as amended, 22 U.S.C. 
                2601(c)(1), I hereby determine that it is important to 
                the national interest that up to $11,000,000 be made 
                available from the U.S. Emergency Refugee and Migration 
                Assistance Fund to meet the urgent and unexpected needs 
                of victims of the conflict in Chechnya. These funds may 
                be used as necessary to provide U.S. contributions in 
                response to the appeals of international and 
                intergovernmental organizations for funds to meet the 
                urgent and unforeseen humanitarian needs of victims of 
                the conflict in Chechnya.

                You are authorized and directed to inform the 
                appropriate committees of the Congress of this 
                determination and the obligation of funds under this 
                authority and to publish this memorandum in the Federal 
                Register.

                    (Presidential Sig.)<Clinton1>><Clinton2>

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, March 13, 1995.

[FR Doc. 95-7259
Filed 3-20-95; 4:54 pm]
UJ.

/RECEIVED^

AUG 1 1 2015

THIRD COURJ OF APPEALS, S -JEFFREY D. KYLE /

A/o

,vc/c ;as r/-/f r// ou. 0/< /*/>/>£*/J

-^ */ *r, s/vJ r/**s/j /Lev*?-y

/

///*/ CAJC *so. o)~ 7?JP- JTJL7 7

/

A

X

r/cc of C//wjc ofio^*JJ

JO ft* M****£A*lt JUO&ff o/eJs/6 Coutf;

/ ^- r/f<MruS AAV ///'/ Asor/**~ o/*

fisnn

ci+i\Sf*fcj 2/A

0CJl/*//'"C

'r£*dJ—2&- /7

C £ f// f/ **<* fc &fJ^cfts, C c_

?t\l 4 C/tf£ e/r /x c* £**'? c/z /i />/>£/>/J' *,osj&x /a.S*/7i /)</jrs*sy r<**S 7&7s/-&fy? 1?L

ior/ ^<U&£
«- 'I '1 / ' *- V

KED*43IWMD£ obstkkt „**—»

USA

t<.j*f

78711254747 i#i|iil,iin.,i|).Mi|i,l.,|.i||i]i,.|/ij|I..l.„.,.i||i,./i||
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

IN THE INTEREST OF: C.R., A MINOR 

PETITION OF: C.R., A MINOR 

:

:

:

:

:

No. 352 MAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 14th day of October, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is DENIED.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5329

Arrowhead Electrical Products, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
 RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of FedFirst Financial Corporation;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: May 12, 2006
    
    /s/ Robert C. Barry Jr.Robert C. Barry Jr.Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President
Electronically Filed 

Supreme Court 

SCWC-12-0000877 

15-MAY-2015 

01:58 PM 

SCWC-12-0000877
 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
 

WENDELL H. JENKINS,


Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant,
 

vs.
 

STATE OF HAWAI'I,


Respondent/Respondent-Appellee. 


CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
 

(CAAP-12-0000877; S.P.P. NO. 08-1-0025; CR. NO. 96-0127)
 

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
 

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, and Wilson, JJ., Circuit Judge


Crabtree, in place of McKenna, J., recused, and Circuit Judge


Ochiai, in place of Pollack, J., recused)
 

Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant Wendell H. Jenkins’s 

Application for Writ of Certiorari filed on April 1, 2015, is hereby 

rejected. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, May 15, 2015. 

Wendell H. Jenkins,

petitioner pro se
 /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald


/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
 

/s/ Michael D. Wilson
 

/s/ Jeffrey P. Crabtree
 

/s/ Dean E. Ochiai
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3147

Ornna Foods Corp:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
ADDENDUM TO PURCHASE OPTION AGREEMENT

  This addendum is made a part of that certain Purchase Option Agreement
(hereinafter referred to as the "Agreement") dated as of January 31, 1996, by
and between Vista Technologies, Inc. ("Buyer") and J. Charles Casebeer
("Seller").

  WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend certain provisions of the Agreement,
and

  WHEREAS, the parties wish to acknowledge receipt by Seller of certain
payments made by Buyer to Seller pursuant to the Agreement.

NOW THEREFORE, the Buyer and Seller hereby agree as follows:

  1.  Paragraph (C) of the Recitals in the Agreement is deleted in its
entirety and the following language is substituted therefore:

  "The Lease also provides that Seller may purchase the Asset at the end
  of the term of the Lease for an amount equal to ten percent (10%) of the
  original cost of the Asset."

  2.  Paragraph 2(b) of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety
and the following language is substituted therefore: 

  "On or before the end of the Lease term, Buyer may pay to Seller or to
  Lessor, an amount, determined by Lessor, equal to the amount necessary
  for Seller to purchase the Asset pursuant to the terms of the Lease (the
  "Payoff Amount").

  3.  Paragraph 2(c) of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety.

  4.  Paragraph 4 of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety.

  5.  Seller hereby acknowledges that he has received from Buyer all of
the payments due under the Lease pursuant to Paragraph 5 of the Agreement,
including the payment due for July 1997.

  6.  Seller hereby acknowledges that he has received from Buyer the cash
consideration pursuant to Paragraph 2(a) of the Agreement.  Seller further
acknowledges that he has received certain payments from Buyer pursuant to the
Promissory Note (the "Note") attached as Exhibit B of the Agreement and that
any unpaid balance due on the Note, if any, is hereby waived.

  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Addendum this 8th day
of July, 1997.

Vista Technologies, Inc. 

By:  /s/  Murray D. Watson                     /s/  J. Charles Casebeer
     ------------------------                  -------------------------
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 15-2262

___________________________

American Alternative Insurance Corporation

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Anthony Williams

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock

____________

 Submitted: January 27, 2016

Filed: January 29, 2016

[Unpublished]

____________

Before WOLLMAN, ARNOLD, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

While paramedic Anthony Williams was riding as a passenger in his

employer’s ambulance, he wasinjured in a collision with a city bus owned by Central

Arkansas Transit Authority (CATA) and driven by Thurman Scott. Mr. Williams

obtained a judgment against CATA and Scott in the amount of $475,000. After

CATA paid its liability limits of $25,000, Mr. Williams sought underinsured motorist
(UIM) benefits fromAmericanAlternative Insurance Corporation (AAIC), the insurer

for his employer, ambulance owner Metropolitan Emergency Medical Services. 

AAIC in turn filed this diversity action seeking a declaratory judgment that it was not

liable because the insurance policy excluded from the definition of an “underinsured

motor vehicle” one owned by a governmental unit or agency such as CATA. The

parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment, and the district court entered 1

judgment in favor of AAIC. Mr. Williams appeals arguing, as he did below, that the

relevant policy clause excluding coverage is void as against public policy;

alternatively, he argues that the clause was not negotiated. 

Following careful review, see Martin v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 183 F.3d 770,

772 (8th Cir. 1999) (applying substantive law of forum state in diversity action), we

agree with the district court that, under Arkansas law, an insurer issuing a commercial

automobile liability policy is not required to offer UIM coverage, see Monday v.

Canal Ins. Co., 73 S.W.3d 594, 597-99 (Ark. 2002) (construing plain language of

Ark. Code Ann. § 23-89-209(a)(1) to require insurers to offer UIM coverage only

when issuing “private passenger automobile liability insurance” policies covering

personal or private vehicles). We also agree with the court that AAIC’s exclusion of

government-owned vehicles from UIM coverage in the policy at issue is not void as

against public policy. See Couch v. Farmers Ins. Co., 289 S.W.3d 909, 916 (Ark.

2008) (courts will not find insurance coverage exclusions void as against public

policy unless legislature specifically prohibited exclusion). Finally, Mr. Williams’s

argument that the exclusion clause was not negotiated is not a basis for reversal. 

The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

The Honorable James M. Moody, Jr., United States District Judge for the

1

Eastern District of Arkansas.

-2-
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5101 

To increase the reference prices for certain commodities, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 1, 2023 

Mr. DAVIS of North Carolina introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To increase the reference prices for certain commodities, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Agricultural Commod5 ities Price Enhancement Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCE PRICE INCREASES FOR WHEAT, CORN, 

7 SOYBEANS, PEANUTS, AND SEED COTTON. 

8 Section 1111(19) is amended of the Agricultural Act 

9 of 2014 (7 U.S.C. 9011(19)) is amended— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5101 IH

1 (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘$5.50 per 

2 bushel’’ and inserting ‘‘$6.05 per bushel’’; 

3 (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘$3.70 per 

4 bushel’’ and inserting ‘‘$4.63 per bushel’’; 

5 (3) in subparagraph (H), by striking ‘‘$8.40 

6 per bushel’’ and inserting ‘‘$9.66 per bushel’’; 

7 (4) in subparagraph (J), by striking ‘‘$535.00 

8 per ton’’ and inserting ‘‘$588.50 per ton’’; and 

9 (5) in subparagraph (O), by striking ‘‘$0.367 

10 per pound’’ and inserting ‘‘$0.45 per pound’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3923

Helen of Troy:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5391

SGRE, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 56 (Thursday, March 23, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15291]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7207]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY


Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute; Collective 
Bargaining; Comment Solicitation for Policy Statement

AGENCY: Federal Labor Relations Authority.

ACTION: Clarification of response deadline.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Labor Relations Authority (Authority) published a 
Notice on March 16, 1995, 60 FR 14285, soliciting comments concerning 
the issuance of a policy statement. The Authority indicated in the 
section entitled ``DATES'' that comments must be received by the 
Authority by close of business on April 17, 1995, to be considered. 
However, the body of the Notice indicated that comments must be 
received by close of business on April 14, 1995, to be considered. This 
Notice clarifies that the deadline for submitting comments is April 17, 
1995.

    Dated: March 20, 1995.

Federal Labor Relations Authority.
Solly Thomas,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 95-7207 Filed 3-22-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6267-01-P