alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 24

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY


     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and
appoints Matthew Bucksbaum, Robert Michaels, Bernard Freibaum and Marshall
Eisenberg and each of them his/her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents,
with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him/her and in his/her
name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the Annual Report on
Form 10-K to be filed by General Growth Properties, Inc. with the Securities and
Exchange Commission and any or all amendments thereto, and to file the same,
with all exhibits thereto, and any other documents in connection therewith, with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and
agents fully power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing
requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all
intents and purposes as he/she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and
confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or their substitute or
substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.  This power
of attorney may be executed in one or more counterparts; each of which shall be
deemed to be an original.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto set his/her hand and seal
as of the 27th day of March, 1997.


/s/Matthew Bucksbaum                          /s/Beth Stewart
__________________________________             ________________________________
Matthew Bucksbaum, Chairman of the             Beth Stewart, Director
Board and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)


/s/Robert Michaels                             /s/Bernard Freibaum
__________________________________             ________________________________
Robert Michaels, President, Chief              Bernard Freibaum, Executive Vice
Operating Officer and Director                 President and Chief Financial
                                               Officer (Principal Financial
                                               and Accounting Officer

/s/John Bucksbaum                              /s/A. Lorne Weil
__________________________________             ________________________________
John Bucksbaum, Executive Vice                 A. Lorne Weil, Director
President and Director


/s/Anthony Downs                               /s/Morris Mark
__________________________________             ________________________________
Anthony Downs, Director                        Morris Mark, Director
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4111

Tianhai Electric North America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________

No. 96-40594

____________

S TATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANC E COMPANY,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

HOWARD L HAWKINS, et al.,

Defendants,

GERALD WHITEHEAD; ROSE WHITEHEAD; STARLETTE
WHITEHEAD,

Intervenor DefendantsAppellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

(6:95-CV-448)

February 17, 1997

Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DEMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

We agree with the district court’s determinati on that the

injuries sustained by the Whiteheads did not result from an

automobile accident so as to trigger coverage under the Hawkinses’-2-

automobile insurance policy. S ee Misle v. State Farm Mut. Auto.

Ins. Co ., 908 S.W.2d 289, 291 (Tex. App. 1995, no writ); Southern

Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co. v. Brock , 659 S.W.2d 165, 166-67 (Tex.

App. 1983, writ ref’d n.r.e.). We therefore AFFIRM the district

court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of State Farm Mutual

Automobile Insurance Company.
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed September 3

, 2014.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D13-1339

Lower Tribunal No. 11-5508

________________



### Teresa Arvizu, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Olegario

Rincon, etc.,

Appellant,

vs.



### Heights Roofing, Inc., Israel J. Garcia, and Hector Cabrera

, Appellees.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Marc

Schumacher

, Judge.

Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A., and Raquel Y. Reyes-Lao and Ronald D.

Rodman

, for appellant.

Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., and Scott A. Cole and Daniel M. Schwarz

, for

appellees.

Before ROTHENBERG, SALTER, and LOGUE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.Although this case reflects a tragic workplace accident that cost Olegario

Rincon his life, there was insufficient evidence that his supervisors acted with

culpable negligence within the meaning of section 440.11(1)(b), Florida Statutes

(2009), as is required to remove this case from the ambit of the laws of Worker’s

Compensation. See Fla. Dep’t of Transp. v. Juliano

, 864 So. 2d 11, 16 (Fla. 3d

DCA 2003) (holding there was no evidence of culpable negligence where

supervisors were merely aware of poor condition and could have done more to

remedy it); Mekamy Oaks, Inc. v. Snyder

, 659 So. 2d 1290, 1291 (Fla. 5th DCA

1995) (holding supervisor’s removal of safety switch did not amount to crime of

culpable negligence). Summary judgment is affirmed.

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<MULTIPLIER>  1000
       
<CAPTION>
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                              0
<SECURITIES>                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                   51175
<ALLOWANCES>                     2266
<INVENTORY>                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                50054
<PP&E>                           8940
<DEPRECIATION>                   5192
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  57348
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           37812
<BONDS>                             0
<COMMON>                          100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                         0
<OTHER-SE>                      15634
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    57348
<SALES>                        117184
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               117184
<CGS>                           91747
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   91747
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                18625
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               1195
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  5617
<INCOME-TAX>                     2225
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              3392
<DISCONTINUED>                  (2482)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                      910
<EPS-PRIMARY>                     .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                     .10

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 510 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 510

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To require the United States Governor of, and the United States 
  Executive Director at, the International Monetary Fund to oppose an 
 increase in the weight of the Chinese renminbi in the Special Drawing 
           Rights basket of the Fund, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Chinese Currency Accountability Act 
of 2023''.

SEC. 2. OPPOSITION OF THE UNITED STATES TO AN INCREASE IN THE WEIGHT OF 
              THE CHINESE RENMINBI IN THE SPECIAL DRAWING RIGHTS BASKET 
              OF THE INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND.

    The Secretary of the Treasury shall instruct the United States 
Governor of, and the United States Executive Director at, the 
International Monetary Fund to use the voice and vote of the United 
States to oppose any increase in the weight of the Chinese renminbi in 
the basket of currencies used to determine the value of Special Drawing 
Rights, unless the Secretary of the Treasury has submitted to the 
Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate a 
written report which includes a certification that--
            (1) the People's Republic of China is in compliance with 
        all its obligations under Article VIII of the Articles of 
        Agreement of the Fund;
            (2) in the preceding 12 months, there has not been a report 
        submitted under section 3005 of the Omnibus Trade and 
        Competitiveness Act of 1988 or section 701 of the Trade 
        Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act of 2015 in which the 
        People's Republic of China has been found to have manipulated 
        its currency; and
            (3) the People's Republic of China adheres to the rules and 
        principles of the Paris Club and the OECD Arrangement on 
        Officially Supported Export Credits.

SEC. 3. SUNSET.

    Section 2 shall have no force or effect beginning 10 years after 
the date of the enactment of this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 9, 2024.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 510

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To require the United States Governor of, and the United States 
  Executive Director at, the International Monetary Fund to oppose an 
 increase in the weight of the Chinese renminbi in the Special Drawing 
           Rights basket of the Fund, and for other purposes.
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 61 (Thursday, March 30, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 16458]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7750]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Corps of Engineers


Finding of No Significant Impact (FNSI) for a Draft Environmental 
Impact Statement (DEIS) for the Lower Santa Cruz River Flood Control 
Study, Pinal County, AZ

AGENCY: Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District, DOD.

ACTION: Finding of no significant impact.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Register, Volume 55, No. 105, dated May 31, 1990, 
contained a Notice of Intent to Prepare a Draft Environmental Impact 
Statement for the Lower Santa Cruz River Flood Control Study, Pinal 
County, AZ. No implementable flood control plan was developed, and the 
study has been terminated. No Draft Environmental Impact Statement was 
prepared.

ADDRESSES: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District, P.O. Box 
2711, Los Angeles, CA 90053-2325.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. William R. Burton, 894-4352.
Kenneth L. Denton,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-7750 Filed 3-29-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-KF-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3303

CW Bearing USA, Inc:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_5-30-2019.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

July 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 130738 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 130738 COA: 266142 Washtenaw CC: 01-000892-FH GLORIA NOBLE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 17, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

d0724 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 31, 2006

Clerk
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4459

CW Bearing USA, Inc:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7651

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ANTHONY LEE SCOTT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior

District Judge. (CR-94-2, CA-98-132-3-P)

Submitted: February 11, 1999 Decided: February 25, 1999

Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Lee Scott, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant filed an untimely notice of appeal. We dismiss for

lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing notices of appeal

are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods are “mandatory

and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections,

434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361

U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Parties to civil actions have sixty days

within which to file in the district court notices of appeal from

judgments or final orders. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). The only

exceptions to the appeal period are when the district court extends

the time to appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).

The district court entered its order on August 12, 1998;

Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed on October 30, 1998, which

is beyond the sixty-day appeal period. Appellant’s failure to note

a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period leaves

this court without jurisdiction to consider the merits of Appellant’s appeal. We therefore deny a certificate of appealability

and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 53 (Monday, March 20, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14735-14736]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6784]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[I.D. 030695C]


Marine Mammals

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Modification no. 3 to scientific research permit no. 717 
(P77#44).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a request for modification of 
scientific research permit no. 717 submitted by Dr. Howard W. Braham, 
Alaska Fisheries Science Center, NMFS, NOAA, National Marine Mammal 
Laboratory, 7600 Sand Point Way, NE., Building 4, Seattle, WA 98115, 
has been granted.

ADDRESSES: The modified permit is available for review by interested 
persons in the following offices by appointment:
    Permits Division, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, 1315 East-
West Highway, Room 13130, Silver Spring, MD 20910 (301/713-2289);
    Director, Northwest Region, NMFS, NOAA, 7600 Sand Point Way, NE., 
BIN C15700, Seattle, WA 98115 (206/526-6150); and
    Director, Southwest Region, NMFS, 501 West Ocean Boulevard, Suite 
4200, [[Page 14736]] Long Beach, CA 90802-4213 (310/980-4016).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On January 20, 1995, notice was published in 
the Federal Register (60 FR 4148) that a modification of permit no. 
717, issued October 22, 1990 (55 FR 35923), had been requested by the 
above-named organization. The requested modification has been granted 
under the authority of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, as 
amended (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.), and the provisions of Secs. 216.33(d) 
and (e) of the Regulations Governing the Taking and Importing of Marine 
Mammals (50 CFR part 216).
    The modification authorized the holder to take an additional 10 
California sea lions (Zalophus californianus) for instrumentation and 
the permit was extended until December 31, 1996.

    Dated: March 14, 1995.
Art Jeffers,
Acting Chief, Permits & Documentation Division, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 95-6784 Filed 3-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
#### Stan ARNOLD, Appellant, v. The CITY OF FLORISSANT, Respondent.

No. 64420.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

March 8, 1994.

Althea Johns, St. Louis, for appellant.

John Michael Hessel, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before GRIMM, P.J., and CARL R. GAERTNER and AHRENS, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, a police officer of the City of Florissant, appeals the judgment of the circuit court affirming the disciplinary action imposed against him by the Florissant Personnel Commission. The Commission’s decision was supported by competent and substantial evidence, was not arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable, and is not in violation of constitutional provisions or in excess of statutory authority. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. However the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information setting forth the facts and reasons for which the trial court’s judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).