alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Organization Name:

Note: Representatives submitting on behalf of an organization must enter information below.

Requestor Representative:

Section 301 Investigation: China's Acts, Policies, and Practices Related to Technology 

Transfer, Intellectual Property, and Innovation - Form to Request Exclusion of Product

When submitting a product exclusion request using this form, enter the specified 

information in the following fields and explain the basis and rationale for your statements. 

By completing this form, you certify that the information provided is complete and 

correct to the best of your knowledge. 

1. Indicate whether the comment contains business confidential information (BCI), is a public

document, or is a public version of a BCI document.

3.

2. Please provide a complete and detailed description of the product of concern:

4.

5. Requestor's relationship to the product:

CONTINUED BELOW

*

10-digit HTSUS item number* for product you wish to address in this product exclusion request:

Use numerical characters only with no special characters (example: 1023456789). For help in finding 

the HTSUS item number associated with your product, see https://hts.usitc.gov/

1

7.

6. Does this submission in regulations.gov include additional attachments?

Please indicate whether any additional attachment contains business confidential

information (BCI), is a public document, or is a public version of a BCI document.

VERSION 1

Requestor Information

Requestor Name (Last, First):

Public Version of BCI

RC156, 15.7 ton Capacity, 6.00 in Stroke, General Purpose Hydraulic Cylinder; Maximum Operating 

Pressure psi: 10000; Weight Kgs: 6,8; Oil Capacity Advance cm3: 308; Stroke Ranges mm: 120 - 

174

8412210075 Schmidt, Jackie Enerpac Jackie SchmidtImporter Yes Contains BCI
END 2

8. Is this product, or a comparable product, available from sources in the United States?:

VERSION 1

11. Please provide information in support your request, taking account of the instructions

provided in Section B of the Federal Register notice (note: text entered below can extend

beyond the apparent size of this box).

9. Is this product, or a comparable product, available from sources in third countries?:

10. Please provide the value and quantity (with units) of the Chinese-origin product of concern

that you purchased for each calendar year specified. Limit this figure to the products

purchased by your firm (or by members of your trade association) alone. Please provide 

estimates if precise figures are unavailable.

2016 Value:

2015 Value:

2017 Value:

2016 Quantity:

2015 Quantity:

2017 Quantity:

No No BCI BCI BCI BCI BCI BCI

See addendum for additional information.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2924

Mabuchi Motor America Corp:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_05.09.19.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM GOTO.COM
INC. FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          22,550
<SECURITIES>                                    69,275
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,599
<ALLOWANCES>                                       250
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                99,064
<PP&E>                                          22,432
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,543
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 359,425
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,794
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             5
<OTHER-SE>                                     336,769
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   359,425
<SALES>                                         17,215
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,215
<CGS>                                            2,605
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   46,711
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (30,509)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (30,509)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (30,509)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.67)


</TABLE>
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 487 

To amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to prohibit a State 

from registering an individual to vote in elections for Federal office 

held in the State unless the individual provides documentary proof that 

the individual is a citizen of the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 24, 2023 

Mr. SELF (for himself, Mr. MORAN, Mr. SESSIONS, and Mr. WEBER of Texas) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

House Administration 

A BILL 

To amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to 

prohibit a State from registering an individual to vote 

in elections for Federal office held in the State unless 

the individual provides documentary proof that the individual is a citizen of the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ensuring American 

5 Voters Act of 2023’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 487 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITING REGISTRATION TO VOTE OF INDIVID2 UALS WHO FAIL TO PROVIDE PROOF OF 

3 UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 8 of the National Voter 

5 Registration Act of 1993 (52 U.S.C. 20507) is amended— 

6 (1) by redesignating subsection (j) as sub7 section (k); and 

8 (2) by inserting after subsection (i) the fol9 lowing new subsection: 

10 ‘‘(j) PROHIBITING REGISTRATION OF INDIVIDUALS

11 NOT PROVIDING PROOF OF UNITED STATES CITIZEN12 SHIP.— 

13 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other 

14 provision of this Act, a State may not register an in15 dividual to vote in elections for Federal office held 

16 in the State unless, at the time the individual ap17 plies to register to vote, the individual provides docu18 mentary proof that the individual is a citizen of the 

19 United States, which shall consist of any of the fol20 lowing (or a photocopy thereof): 

21 ‘‘(A) A certified birth certificate issued by 

22 a State or unit of local government in a State. 

23 ‘‘(B) A valid United States passport. 

24 ‘‘(C) A Consular Report of Birth Abroad 

25 issued by the Secretary of State. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 487 IH

1 ‘‘(D) A Naturalization Certificate or Cer2 tificate of Citizenship issued by the Secretary of 

3 Homeland Security. 

4 ‘‘(2) APPLICABILITY.—Paragraph (1) applies 

5 with respect to an individual who applies to register 

6 to vote under section 5, 6, or 7 (including an indi7 vidual who submits the mail voter registration appli8 cation form prescribed by the Election Assistance 

9 Commission pursuant to section 9), or who applies 

10 under any other method of voter registration avail11 able in the State.’’. 

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

13 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to applications for 

14 voter registration which are submitted on or after the date 

15 of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-4590

Zipline International Inc: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 13, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4164

Cummins Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 58 (Monday, March 27, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15764]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7380]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[Correction to Report No. 2063]


Petition for Reconsideration of Actions in Rulemaking Proceedings

March 22, 1995.
    Report No. 2063, released March 16, 1995 (60 FR 14941, March 21, 
1995) prematurely listed the below petition for reconsideration. 
Therefore this petition is hereby deleted.
    Subject: Amendment of Part 90 of the Commission's Rules to Adopt 
Regulations for Automatic Vehicle Monitoring Systems. (PR Docket No. 
93-61)
    Number of Petition Filed: 1.

Federal Communications Commission.
William F. Caton,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-7380 Filed 3-24-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5092 

To amend title XVII of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to specify that 

the Secretary of Energy may not make a loan guarantee under such 

title for a project if the applicable borrower has previously defaulted 

on an obligation guaranteed under such title, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 28, 2023 

Mr. WALBERG introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 

Science, Space, and Technology, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XVII of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 

to specify that the Secretary of Energy may not make 

a loan guarantee under such title for a project if the 

applicable borrower has previously defaulted on an obligation guaranteed under such title, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Energy Accountability 

5 Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5092 IH

1 SEC. 2. DISQUALIFICATION OF BORROWERS WHO HAVE 

2 PREVIOUSLY DEFAULTED. 

3 Section 1702 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 

4 U.S.C. 16512) is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing: 

6 ‘‘(s) DISQUALIFICATION FOR PREVIOUS DE7 FAULTS.—The Secretary may not make a guarantee under 

8 this title for a project if the borrower or any related or 

9 successor entity, as determined by the Secretary, has pre10 viously defaulted on an obligation guaranteed under this 

11 title.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**STATEMENTOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the “Form 10-Q”) ofCardinal Financial Corporation, I, Bernard H. Clineburg, Chairman, Presidentand Chief Executive Officer, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to my knowledge:

 

(a)                                  theForm 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(b)                                 the information contained in the Form10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financialcondition and results of operations of the Company and its subsidiaries as of,and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.

 
| Date: August 9, 2005 | /s/ Bernard  H. Clineburg                        |   |
|---------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                      | Bernard H. Clineburg                             |
|                      | Chairman, President and Chief Executive  Officer |

 

----
#### H. E. WOOLARD, Administrator of the Estate of JESSE J. SOUTHARD, v. EARLY G. LYNN, GEORGE K. MIDDLETON and SHIRLEY LEE LYNN.

(Filed 10 May, 1961.)

Appeal by plaintiff from Olive, *J.,*at January 9, 1961, Civil Term of Guileobb— Greensboro Division.

Civil action to recover damages for alleged wrongful death caused by the alleged joint and concurrent negligence of defendants. It appears from the complaint and amended complaint that intestate of plaintiff was killed on 30 November 1958, at approximately 8:30 P.M., on U. S. Highway #29 Bypass, just west of the city limits of the city of Reidsville, North Carolina, when struck by an automobile driven by the defendant Early G. Lynn, which was owned by defendant Shirley Lee Lynn, and subsequently struck by an automobile owned and operated by defendant George K. Middleton.

Defendants Early G. Lynn and Shirley Lee Lynn on the one hand, and George K. Middleton on the other, by separate answers, denied liability.

All parties offered evidence, and the case was submitted to the jury upon issues of negligence, contributory negligence and damages. The jurors for their verdict answered that plaintiff’s intestate was not injured by the negligence either of the defendants Early G. Lynn and Shirley Lee Lynn or of defendant George K. Middleton as alleged in the complaint.

And from judgment for defendants in acordance therewith, plaintiff appeals to Supreme Court and assigns error.

*680*Smith, Moore, Smith, Schell & Hunter, Charles E. Melvin, Jr., for plaintiff appellant.*

*Adams, Kleemeier & Hagan, Daniel W. Fonts for defendant George K. Middleton.*

*Holt, McNairy & Harris for defendants Early G. Lynn and Shirley Lee Lynn.*

Per Curiam.

The record of case on appeal shows that no new questions of law are presented on this appeal, and that the case was tried in substantial accord with correct legal principles. Indeed the record fails to show error for which the judgment below should be disturbed.

No error.
ex1017.htm


EXHIBIT 10.17


 


 





 


 




  





  











  









 




  





  











  









 




  





  











  









 




  





  











  









 




  





  











  






p
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4346

Aisin World Corp. of America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1729

ROBERT G. BREMNER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; INTERNAL REVENUE

SERVICE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Richard L.

Williams, Senior District Judges. (MISC-97-4-3)

Submitted: August 28, 1997 Decided: September 12, 1997

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert G. Bremner, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Edward Brookhart,

Sara Ann Ketchum, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington,

D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his Petition to Quash Internal Revenue Service Third Party Summons. Our

review of the record discloses that the Government met its burden

of proof under 26 U.S.C. § 7602 (1994) to support the enforcement

of the summons. See United States v. Powell, 379 U.S. 48, 57-58

(1964); Alphin v. United States, 809 F.2d 236, 238 (4th Cir. 1987).

Moreover, we find that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Appellant's motion filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 52,

59. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED