Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 57 / Friday, March 24, 1995 / Notices 15585

Others = None. To provide midyear

and advance yearend counts of the

number of inmates in State and

Federal prisons. These data will form

the basis for historical trend analysis.

Respondents are personnel in the

correctional department of the state,

the District of Columbia, and the

Federal Bureau of Prisons.

(4) 104 annual respondents at 2.5 hours

per response.

(5) 130 annual burden hours.

(6) Not applicable under Section

3504(h) of Public Law 96–511.

Public comment on this item is

encouraged.

Dated: March 20, 1995.

Robert B. Briggs,

Department Clearance Officer, United States

Department of Justice.

[FR Doc. 95–7268 Filed 3–23–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–18–M

Information Collections Under Review

The Office of Management and Budget

(OMB) has been sent the following

collection(s) of information proposals

for review under the provisions of the

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.

Chapter 35) and the Paperwork

Reduction Reauthorization Act since the

last list was published. Entries are

grouped into submission categories,

with each entry containing the

following information:

(1) the title of the form/collection;

(2) the agency form number, if any, and

the applicable component of the

Department sponsoring the collection.

(3) who will be asked or required to

respond, as well as a brief abstract;

(4) an estimate of the total number of

respondents and the amount of time

estimated for an average respondent

to respond:

(5) an estimate of the total public

burden (in hours) associated with the

collection; and,

(6) an indication as to whether Section

3504(h) of Public Law 96–511 applies.

Comments and/or suggestions

regarding the item(s) contained in this

notice, especially regarding the

estimated public burden and associated

response time, should be directed to the

OMB reviewer, Mr. Jeff Hill on (202)

395–7340 and to the Department of

Justice’s Clearance Officer, Mr. Robert B.

Briggs, on (202) 514–4319. If you

anticipate commenting on a form/

collection, but find that time to prepare

such comments will prevent you from

prompt submission, you should notify

the OMB reviewer and the Department

of Justice Clearance Officer of your

intent as soon as possible. Written

comments regarding the burden

estimate or any other aspect of the

collection may be submitted to Office of

Information and Regulatory Affairs,

Office of Management and Budget,

Washington, DC 20503, and to Mr.

Robert B. Briggs, Department of Justice

Clearance Officer, Systems Policy Staff/

Information Resources Management/

Justice Management Division, Suite 850,

WCTR, Washington, DC 20530.

Revision of a Currently Approved

Collection

(1) 1994 National Survey of Prosecutors.

(2) NSP–1. Bureau of Justice Statistics,

States Department of Justice.

(3) Primary = State, Local, or Tribunal

Government. Others = None. This

biennial survey collects data on the

resources, policies, and practices of

local prosecutors from a nationally

representative sample of 300 chief

litigating prosecutors in State Court

Systems.

(4) 300 annual respondents at 1.0 hours

per response.

(5) 150 annual burden hours.

(6) Not applicable under Section

3504(h) of Public Law 96–511.

Public comment on this item is

encouraged.

Dated: March 20, 1995.

Robert B. Briggs,

Department Clearance Officer, United States

Department of Justice.

[FR Doc. 95–7269 Filed 3–23–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–18–M

Drug Enforcement Administration

Henry M. Goshen, M.D.; Denial of

Application

On February 14, 1994, the Deputy

Assistant Administrator, Office of

Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement

Administration (DEA), issued an Order

to Show Cause to Henry M. Goshen,

M.D. (Dr. Goshen), of Chicago, Illinois,

proposing to deny his application for a

DEA Certificate of Registration, as a

practitioner, under 21 U.S.C. 823(f). The

Order to Show Cause alleged that Dr.

Goshen’s registration would be

inconsistent with the public interest, as

that term is used in 21 U.S.C. 823(f).

The Order to Show Cause was served

on Dr. Goshen by registered mail. More

than thirty days have passed since the

Order to Show Cause was received by

Dr. Goshen and the DEA has received no

response thereto. Pursuant to 21 CFR

1301.54(a) and 1301.54(d), Henry M.

Goshen, M.D., is deemed to have waived

his opportunity for a hearing.

Accordingly, the Deputy Administrator

now enters his final order in this matter

without a hearing and based on the

investigative file. 21 CFR 1301.57.

The Deputy Administrator finds that

the Illinois State Police initiated an

undercover investigation of Dr.

Goshen’s medical practice. On October

24, 1985, an undercover police officer

met Dr. Goshen at his office to request

diet pills. Notwithstanding that Dr.

Goshen determined that this person was

not overweight, he dispensed to the

undercover officer 14 dosage unites of

phentermine, a Schedule IV controlled

substance, which he indicated was a

two week supply.

On October 29, 1985, the undercover

officer returned to Dr. Goshen’s office

and asked for additional diet pills,

explaining that she had given some of

her phentermine to a girl friend. Dr.

Goshen then dispensed more

phentermine to the undercover officer.

The undercover officer returned to Dr.

Goshen’s office, on November 5, 1985

and, once again, Dr. Goshen dispensed

phentermine tablets. The undercover

officer paid Dr. Goshen $20 for each

visit.

Based upon excessive purchase

reports for controlled substances and

complaints about Dr. Goshen’s

controlled substance dispensing

practices, a Chicago DEA task force

initiated an undercover operation in

1989. On October 5, 1989, an

undercover police officer visited Dr.

Goshen’s office, seeking controlled

substances. When she encountered Dr.

Goshen, she requested phentermine

using the street name for this controlled

substance. Dr. Goshen, without seeking

any medical information from her or

performing any medical examinations,

dispensed 28 dosage units of

phentermine in exchange for $40.

This undercover officer returned to

Dr. Goshen’s office on October 17, 1989,

again requesting more phentermine and

using the drug’s street name. On this

occasion, she asked for double the

amount she received on the prior visit.

In response, Dr. Goshen dispensed two

envelopes, each containing 28

phentermine capsules. When Dr.

Goshen gave her the drugs, he asked her

who would receive the pills. The officer

gave him three names. She then paid Dr.

Goshen $80 for the phentermine.

On November 3, 1989, Dr. Goshen

was arrested and charged with one

count of illegal distribution of

controlled substances in violation of 21

U.S.C. 841(a)(1). At the time of his

arrest, a search warrant was executed at

Dr. Goshen’s office and during the

search approximately 42,000 dosage

units of controlled substances were

seized. Further investigation revealed

that Dr. Goshen had no dispensing