alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Presidential Documents

15843

Federal Register

Vol. 60, No. 58

Monday, March 27, 1995

Title 3—

The President

Proclamation 6779 of March 23, 1995

Greek Independence Day: A National Day of Celebration of

Greek and American Democracy, 1995

By the President of the United States of America

A Proclamation

Two thousand five hundred years ago in Athens, across the Peninsula of

Attica and throughout Greece, the idea of democracy was embodied in

a series of rights and laws. The resulting freedom for the citizens of that

land sparked a period of unprecedented activity in philosophy and the

arts. The birth of democracy in Greece signaled the beginning of a lasting

cultural transformation clearly reflected in the course of Western civilization.

The United States is proud to acknowledge the debt it owes to the ancient

Greeks, whose philosophy and political system guided America’s founders

in forming a representative democracy on this continent. Yet the common

bond that unites our modern nations goes beyond our commitment to the

principles of democracy; beyond, too, the close friendship that we share.

Through the years, our citizens have demonstrated a willingness to fight

for the right to self-determination and for the cause of human dignity.

The Greek struggle for independence 174 years ago won the hearts of Americans and all those who love freedom. As we mark the anniversary of that

momentous occasion, Americans and Greeks join again in celebration.

Our countries now stand at the dawn of a new era—a time of growing

hope and expanding opportunity. Nations across Central Europe are striving

to turn from ancient rivalries and to embrace the possibility of democratic,

market-oriented change. The Greek dedication to independence can provide

both an important example and a helping hand for its neighbors, and Greece’s

recent efforts to strengthen these ties can serve to foster stability and prosperity throughout the region.

Today, as ever, the United States supports Greece in its call for fellowship

and peace. We stand together in affirming that the blessings of democracy

will long survive and flourish.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, WILLIAM J. CLINTON, President of the United States

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim March 25, 1995, as

‘‘Greek Independence Day: A National Day of Celebration of Greek and

American Democracy.’’ I call upon all Americans to observe this day with

appropriate programs, ceremonies, and activities.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-third

day of March, in the year of our Lord nineteen hundred and ninety-five,

and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred

[FR Doc. 95–7670

Filed 3–23–95; 5:05 pm]

Billing code 3195–01–P

and nineteenth.

œ–
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4504

Williams Controls Incorporated:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           NOV-3-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-03-1996
<CASH>                                           6,186
<SECURITIES>                                     4,223
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,094
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     23,619
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                68,885
<PP&E>                                          67,252
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,352
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 116,494
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,257
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           503
<OTHER-SE>                                      96,591
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   116,494
<SALES>                                        202,951
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               202,951
<CGS>                                           88,871
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   88,871
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                68,385
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 47,050
<INCOME-TAX>                                    19,929
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             27,122
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    27,122
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.59
        

</TABLE>
# ALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

July 12, 2024 CR-2023-0661 James Alaster Hayes v. State of Alabama (Appeal from Escambia Circuit Court: CC-19-317) 

## NOTICE You are hereby notified that on July 12, 2024, the following action was taken in the above-reference cause by the Court of Criminal Appeals: Application for Rehearing Overruled.

D. Scott Mitchell, Clerk
Exhibit 10.8


 


Quad/Graphics, Inc.

Summary of 2009 Annual Cash Incentive Program


 


Under Quad/Graphics, Inc.’s (Quad/Graphics’)
annual cash incentive compensation program for 2009, the potential payment
levels under the annual cash incentive compensation program consisted of a “threshold”
level, a “target” level and a “maximum” level. 
The corporate performance levels corresponding to these payment levels
were expressed as a company “grade.” 
Quad/Graphics’ board of directors determined the company grade for the
year, which could have been “A,” “B,” “C” or “below threshold,” in its
discretion based on its subjective judgment. 
Each company grade would have resulted in a different payment level, as
indicated below:


 




	
  Company Grade

  	
   

  	
  Payment Level

  
	
  A

  	
   

  	
  Maximum

  
	
  B

  	
   

  	
  Target

  
	
  C

  	
   

  	
  Threshold

  
	
  Below Threshold

  	
   

  	
  None

  






 


There were no limitations on the factors that the
board of directors could consider in determining the company grade.


 


In November 2009, Quad/Graphics’ board of
directors determined that, as a result of year-over-year declines in sales, net
income and EBITDA and return on capital below cost of capital, the threshold
performance level had not been achieved in 2009.  Accordingly, the board of directors did not
assign a company grade, thereby determining that there would be no payments
under the annual incentive program for 2009.


 


The threshold, target and maximum payment levels
established by the compensation committee, and the actual bonus amounts, for
Quad/Graphics’ named executive officers were as follows:


 


	
  Name

  	
   

  	
  2009 Threshold

  Bonus Amount

  	
   

  	
  2009 Target

  Bonus Amount

  	
   

  	
  2009 Maximum

  Bonus Amount

  	
   

  	
  2009 Actual

  Bonus Amount

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  J.
  Joel Quadracci

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  533,400

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  1,022,350

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  1,778,000

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  0

  	
   

  
	
  John
  C. Fowler

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  286,000

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  442,000

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  780,000

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  0

  	
   

  
	
  Thomas
  J. Frankowski

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  200,750

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  310,250

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  547,500

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  0

  	
   

  
	
  David
  A. Blais

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  200,750

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  310,250

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  547,500

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  0
Organization Name:

Note: Representatives submitting on behalf of an organization must enter information below.

Requestor Representative:

Section 301 Investigation: China's Acts, Policies, and Practices Related to Technology 

Transfer, Intellectual Property, and Innovation - Form to Request Exclusion of Product

When submitting a product exclusion request using this form, enter the specified 

information in the following fields and explain the basis and rationale for your statements. 

By completing this form, you certify that the information provided is complete and 

correct to the best of your knowledge. 

1. Indicate whether the comment contains business confidential information (BCI), is a public

document, or is a public version of a BCI document.

3.

2. Please provide a complete and detailed description of the product of concern:

4.

5. Requestor's relationship to the product:

CONTINUED BELOW

*

10-digit HTSUS item number* for product you wish to address in this product exclusion request:

Use numerical characters only with no special characters (example: 1023456789). For help in finding 

the HTSUS item number associated with your product, see https://hts.usitc.gov/

1

7.

6. Does this submission in regulations.gov include additional attachments?

Please indicate whether any additional attachment contains business confidential

information (BCI), is a public document, or is a public version of a BCI document.

VERSION 1

Requestor Information

Requestor Name (Last, First):

Public Version of BCI

RCS1002, 98.1 ton Capacity, 2.25 in Stroke, Low Height Hydraulic Cylinder; Maximum Operating 

Pressure psi: 10000; Weight Kgs: 20,7; Oil Capacity Advance cm3: 722; Stroke Ranges mm: 48 - 94

8412210075 Schmidt, Jackie Enerpac Jackie SchmidtImporter Yes Contains BCI
END 2

8. Is this product, or a comparable product, available from sources in the United States?:

VERSION 1

11. Please provide information in support your request, taking account of the instructions

provided in Section B of the Federal Register notice (note: text entered below can extend

beyond the apparent size of this box).

9. Is this product, or a comparable product, available from sources in third countries?:

10. Please provide the value and quantity (with units) of the Chinese-origin product of concern

that you purchased for each calendar year specified. Limit this figure to the products

purchased by your firm (or by members of your trade association) alone. Please provide 

estimates if precise figures are unavailable.

2016 Value:

2015 Value:

2017 Value:

2016 Quantity:

2015 Quantity:

2017 Quantity:

No No BCI BCI BCI BCI BCI BCI

See addendum for additional information.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-5381

Bosch Automotive Service Solutions Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5217

Schindler Elevator Corporation:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4622

Yanfeng US Automotive Interior Systems I LLC:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
**EXHIBIT 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8(File Nos. 333-50137, 333-90293, 333-56606, 333-89184, 333-102147, 333-105193, 333-106594 and333-126121) and the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-65035, 333-48540, 333-71958,333-84914, 333-99033, 333-102186, 333-106589, 333-111818, and 333-117107) of SuperconductorTechnologies Inc. of our report dated March 30, 2007 relating to the consolidated financialstatements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K./s/ STONEFIELD JOSEPHSON, INC.Los Angeles, California
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5063

A.W. Chesterton Company:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
**Exhibit 10.16**

 

**AMENDMENT NO. 1**

**TO**

**EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT**

 

THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this“Amendment”) is made and entered into as of the 23rd day of January, 2003, by and between Pillowtex Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Michael T. Gannaway (“Employee”). 

 

W I T N E S S E T H: 

 

WHEREAS, the parties hereto are parties to that certain Employment Agreement dated as of October 1, 2002 (the “EmploymentAgreement”) (capitalized terms used herein but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Employment Agreement); and 

 

WHEREAS, Section 2.2(e) of the Employment Agreement provides in part that the Company will grant to Employeea restricted stock award in the amount of Sixty Thousand (60,000) shares of Pillowtex Common Stock on or before January 31, 2003 (the “Issuance Date”), and 

 

WHEREAS, the Company and Employee desire to amend Section 2.2(e) of the Employment Agreement to change theIssuance Date from January 31, 2003 to February 28, 2003; 

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants and agreements set forth herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: 

 

1. Section 2.2(e) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended to change the date referenced therein from January 31, 2003 to February28, 2003. 

 

2. In all other respects, and as soamended, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect according to its terms and conditions. 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first set forth above intending to be bound hereby.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6087

ANTHONY LLOYD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

GARRETT GLENNON, Deputy State’s Attorney for Baltimore County, Maryland; 

J. PHILIP MORGAN,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCE, INC.; CONTAH NIMELY, M.D.; LORI 

SLAVICK, P.A.,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (1:16-cv-02160-JKB)

Submitted: May 17, 2018 Decided: May 21, 2018

Before KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Anthony Lloyd, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Lloyd seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 

§ 1983 (2012) action against some, but not all, Defendants. This court may exercise 

jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and 

collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial 

Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Lloyd seeks to appeal is 

neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we 

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### NUMBER 13

- 20

- 00243

- CV



## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

CITY OF PORT ARANSAS, TEXAS, Appellant,

v.

THE PORT OF CORPUS CHRISTI AUTHORITY OF

NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS, AND SAM ESQUIVAL,

IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY OF DIRECTOR OF

REAL ESTATE SERVICES OF THE PORT

OF CORPUS CHRISTI AUTHORITY OF

NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS Appellee s

.

On a ppeal from the 117th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Longoria

This cause is before the Court on appellant ’ s agreed motion to dismiss the appeal

on grounds that the parties have reached an agreement as to the underlying dispute in2 the lawsuit from which this appeal arises. Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the

appeal.

The Court, having considered the docume nts on file and appellant ’ s agreed motion

to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See T EX

. R.

A PP

. P . 42. 1 . Appellant ’ s agreed motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby

DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellant. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(d) ( “ Absent

agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant. ” ). Having

dismissed the appeal at appe llant ’ s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained,

and our mandate will issue forthwith.

NORA L. LONGORIA

Justice

D elivered and filed the

24 th day of September

, 2020

.