U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Food and Feed Safety Research: College Station, TX
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area College Station, Texas Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center Food and Feed Safety Research Research Publications at this Location





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Title:   Author  item
                                            Edrington, Thomasitem
                                            FOX, W - TX WATER RESOURCES INSTitem
                                            Callaway, Todditem
                                            Anderson, Robinitem
                                            Nisbet, David
  Submitted to: Society of Range Management
                                    Publication Type: Abstract Only
                                    Publication Acceptance Date: 9/22/2007
                                    Publication  Date: 2/10/2007
                                    Citation: Edrington, T.S., Fox, W.E., Callaway, T.R., Anderson, R.C., Nisbet, D.J. 2007. Microbiological aspects of applying composted dairy manure to amend damaged rangeland [abstract]. Society for Range Management, 60th Annual Meeting and Trade Show, February 10-16, 2007, Reno/Sparks, Nevada. p. 90-91. 2007 CDROM.Interpretive Summary:
                                Technical Abstract: Manure production and its subsequent disposal is a continual problem for the livestock producer.  Composting manure, if done properly should kill bacteria such as E. coli O157:H7, providing for an environmentally safe product.  Recently, large scale application of composted manure to aid in land restoration has been evaluated on damaged rangeland.  While the benefits of this practice could be substantial, it is crucial to ensure that such large scale applications are safe and harmonious with the environment.  Samples of composted dairy manure, representing 8 composting operations, were screened for the pathogenic bacteria Salmonella and E. coli O157:H7 and were all culture negative.  However, some non-pathogenic bacteria were cultured from these compost samples that could theoretically facilitate the spread of antimicrobial resistance from the dairy to compost application sites.  Therefore, we collected soil samples from rangeland that received either composted dairy manure (CP), commercial fertilizer (F), or no treatment (control, CON).  Two collections were made appoximately 2 and 7 months following treatment application.  Soil samples were cultured for Pseudomonas and Enterobacter and confirmed isolates subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing.  Two species of Enterobacter (sakazakii, cloacae) and two species of Pseudomonas (aeruginosa and putida) were identified.  Five Enterobacter isolates were resistant to ampicillin and one isolate was resistant to spectinomycin.  All Pseudomonas isolates were multi-resistant (5 to 9 different antibiotics) and resistant to an average of 8.6, 7.9 and 8 antibiotics for CON, CP, and F treatments, respectively.  All Pseudomonas isolates were resistant to ampicillin, ceftiofur, florfenicol, sulphachloropyridazine, sulphadimethoxine, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and most isolates were resistant to chlortetracycline and spectinomycin.  No treatment differences were observed in antimicrobial resistance patterns in any of the soil isolates examined.  Results reported herein support the use of composted dairy manure as an environmentally friendly soil amendment.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov