alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Cause No 01-11-00703-CV; In the Interest of D.J.W., A Child

On appeal from the 313th District Court of Harris County, Texas, trial court case

number 2010-04338J

On August 31, 2012, appellant, N.W., filed a motion for rehearing and a motion for

reconsideration en banc from this Court’s August 16, 2012 opinion. The Court requests a

response. It is ordered that the appellee’s response is due Tuesday, September 18, 2012.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/Michael Massengale

Acting individually

Date: September 4, 2012
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5110 

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to clarify 

that the prohibition on the use of Federal education funds for certain 

weapons does not apply to the use of such weapons for training in 

archery, hunting, or other shooting sports. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 1, 2023 

Mr. GREEN of Tennessee (for himself and Mr. HUDSON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the 

Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act 

of 1965 to clarify that the prohibition on the use of 

Federal education funds for certain weapons does not 

apply to the use of such weapons for training in archery, 

hunting, or other shooting sports. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Hunting 

5 Heritage and Education Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 5110 IH

1 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF PROHIBITION ON USE OF FED2 ERAL EDUCATION FUNDS FOR CERTAIN 

3 WEAPONS AND RELATED TRAINING. 

4 Section 8526(7) of the Elementary and Secondary 

5 Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7906(7)) is amended 

6 by inserting ‘‘, except that this paragraph shall not apply 

7 so as to prohibit the use of funds under this Act for the 

8 provision or use of such a weapon for purposes of training 

9 students in archery, hunting, or other shooting sports’’ be10 fore the period at the end. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 32.2

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Killbuck Bancshares, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Diane Knowles, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                         |  | 
|--- |  | ----------------------- |  | 
|By: |  | /s/ Diane S. Knowles    |  | 
|    |  | Diane S. Knowles        |  | 
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|    |  | May 9, 2007             |  | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Killbuck Bancshares,
Inc. and will be retained by Killbuck Bancshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5518

Tianhai Electric North America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
<PAGE>   1
                                                              EXHIBIT 01.10-23-1


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


         We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
No. 333-55727 of Black Hawk gaming & Development Company, Inc. on Form S-3 and
in Registration Statement No. 333-90067 of Black Hawk Gaming & Development
Company, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated March 27, 2001 appearing in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Black Hawk Gaming & Development Company, Inc. for
the year ended December 31, 2000.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Denver, Colorado
March 27, 2001
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

J u ly 1 2 , 2021 

# Order

Clerk July 1 2 , 2021

16 3258

- 9 ( 6 9 )

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 16 3258

v COA: 347207

Macomb CC: 2017

- 002787

- FC

JEREMIAH JAMES BOSHELL

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 16 3259

v COA: 34 7208

Macomb CC: 2017

- 00 0658

- FC

JEREMIAH JAMES BOSHELL

, Defendant

- Appell ant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant

- appellant to exceed the page

limitation for his application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The 60

- page application

submitted on July 8 , 2021 , is accepted for filing

.
#### Lonnie SNELLING, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. CHRYSLER MOTORS CORPORATION, et al., Defendants/Respondents.

No. 69162.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

May 7, 1996.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied June 17, 1996.

Application to Transfer Denied Aug. 20, 1996.

Lonnie Snelling, St. Louis, pro se.

Thompson & Mitchell, Diane M. Hoelzl, St. Louis, for respondents.

Before PUDLOWSKI, P.J., and SIMON and HOFF, JJ.

*MEMORANDUM DECISION*

PER CURIAM.

Snelling, pro se, filed an action alleging a claim for retaliatory discharge, a claim for defamation of character and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Said action was dismissed. On appeal this court dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Subsequently, the trial court dismissed all claims and motions. He then filed this equity action alleging relief under Rule 74.06. After several motions were filed by both parties and oral argument heard, the trial court dismissed all counts of his cause of action. In this court, respondents, Chrysler Motors Corporation, et al., filed a petition seeking damages for frivolous appeal. Snelling, in his reply brief and in a separate motion, requests sanctions against respondents and their counsel for filing frivolous pleadings.

Finding no error of law and determining that an opinion would have no precedential value, the trial court’s judgment is affirmed by this memorandum decision. Rule 84.16(b). Snelling’s requests for sanctions are without merit and are denied. Chrysler Motors Corporation’s petition for damages is sustained and Chrysler Motors Corporation is awarded $2,000. as damages for Snelling’s filing of a frivolous appeal. Rule 84.19.

The judgment is affirmed and the cause is remanded to the trial court with directions to enter a judgment against Lonnie Snelling and in favor of Chrysler Motors Corporation in the amount of $2,000. as damages for frivolous appeal. *See Presto Roofing Co. Inc. v. Hammons,*916 S.W.2d 797 (Mo. banc 1996).
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T M A G D A LEN O LU N A - V A RG A S, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 74281 A ge nc yN o. A 092- 546- 612 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d A pr i l5, 2010 ** B efo re: R Y M E R , M cK E O W N , an dP A E Z , C i rcu i tJu d g es. M a gda l e no L una - V ar ga s , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pe t i t i ons f

or r e vi e w of

the B oar d of

I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ ( “ B I A ” ) or de rs um m ar i l ya f f i rm i ng 

# FI LED APR19 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS07- 74281 2 a n i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s ( “ I J ” ) de c i s i on de ny i ng hi s appl i c a t i on f orc anc e l l a t i on of r e m o v a l f

o rl e g a l p e rm an e n tr e s i d e n t s . We d i s m i s s th e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. L u n a - V ar g a s ’ s o le c o n te n tio n is th a t th e I Jv io la te ddu e p r o c e s s b e c au s e h is advers e c re di bi l i ty det erm i nat i on re l i ed i n p arton a s t at em entfr om a s m ug gl ed a l i e n w ho w a s notpr e s e ntt o t e s t i f y . W e l a c k j ur i s di c t i on t o r e vi e w thi s c ont e nt i on b e c au s e L u n a - V ar g a s f

a ile dto r a is e it b e f

o r e th e B I A . Se e B a rr o n v . A s h c r o ft , 358 F .3 d6 7 4 , 6 7 8 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 4 ) ; s e e a ls o Za ra v . A s h c r o ft , 3 8 3 F .3 d9 2 7 , 9 3 0 ( 9 th C i r . 2004) ( “ A pe t i t i one rc annots a t i s f ythe e xhaus t i on r e qui r e m e ntbym a ki ng a generalchal l enge t o the IJ ’ s dec i si on , bu t , rather, m ustspec i fyw hi ch i ss ues f orm the basi s of the appeal . ”) . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DI S MI S S E D.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2298

Primex Family of Companies:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 54 (Tuesday, March 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 14980]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6879]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards Subcommittee Meeting on 
Planning and Procedures; Notice of Meeting

    The ACRS Subcommittee on Planning and Procedures will hold a 
meeting on April 5, 1995, Room T-2B1, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 
Maryland.
    The entire meeting will be open to public attendance, with the 
exception of a portion that may be closed pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) 
(2) and (6) to discuss organizational and personnel matters that relate 
solely to internal personnel rules and practices of ACRS, and matters 
the release of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 
personal privacy.
    The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows:

Wednesday, April 5, 1995--2:00 p.m. Until the Conclusion of 
Business

    The Subcommittee will discuss proposed ACRS activities and 
related matters. It will also discuss the status of the appointment 
of members to the ACRS. The purpose of this meeting is to gather 
information, analyze relevant issues and facts, and to formulate 
proposed positions and actions, as appropriate, for deliberation by 
the full Committee.
    Oral statements may be presented by members of the public with 
the concurrence of the Subcommittee Chairman; written statements 
will be accepted and made available to the Committee. Electronic 
recordings will be permitted only during those portions of the 
meeting that are open to the public, and questions may be asked only 
by members of the Subcommittee, its consultants, and staff. Persons 
desiring to make oral statements should notify the cognizant ACRS 
staff person named below five days prior to the meeting, if 
possible, so that appropriate arrangements can be made.
    Further information regarding topics to be discussed, the 
scheduling of sessions open to the public, whether the meeting has 
been canceled or rescheduled, the Chairman's ruling on requests for 
the opportunity to present oral statements, and the time allotted 
therefore can be obtained by contracting the cognizant ACRS staff 
person, Dr. John T. Larkins (telephone: 301/415-7360) between 7:30 
a.m. and 4:15 p.m. (EST). Persons planning to attend this meeting 
are urged to contact the above named individual one or two working 
days prior to the meeting to be advised of any changes in schedule, 
etc., that may have occurred.

    Dated: March 15, 1995.
Sam Duraiswamy
Chief, Nuclear Reactors Branch.
[FR Doc. 95-6879 Filed 3-20-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4388 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to waive cost-sharing under the 

TRICARE program for three mental health outpatient visits per year, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 14, 2022 

Mr. OSSOFF (for himself and Mr. CRAMER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to waive cost-sharing 

under the TRICARE program for three mental health 

outpatient visits per year, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Military Families Men5 tal Health Services Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 4388 IS

1 SEC. 2. WAIVER OF COST-SHARING FOR THREE MENTAL 

2 HEALTH OUTPATIENT VISITS UNDER THE 

3 TRICARE PROGRAM. 

4 (a) TRICARE SELECT.—Section 1075(c) of title 10, 

5 United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 

6 following new paragraph: 

7 ‘‘(4) Consistent with other provisions of this 

8 chapter and under requirements to be prescribed by 

9 the Secretary, the Secretary may waive cost-sharing 

10 requirements for the first three outpatient mental 

11 health visits of a beneficiary each year.’’. 

12 (b) TRICARE PRIME.—Section 1075a(a) of such 

13 title is amended by adding at the end the following new 

14 paragraph: 

15 ‘‘(4) Consistent with other provisions of this 

16 chapter and under requirements to be prescribed by 

17 the Secretary, the Secretary may waive cost-sharing 

18 requirements for the first three outpatient mental 

19 health visits of a beneficiary each year.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           6,773
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   92,267
<ALLOWANCES>                                    18,130
<INVENTORY>                                    109,458
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               230,619
<PP&E>                                         506,166
<DEPRECIATION>                                 181,869
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 633,704
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          149,848
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           131
<OTHER-SE>                                      62,182
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   633,704
<SALES>                                        738,933
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               738,933
<CGS>                                          647,719
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  647,719
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,589
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   394
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              36,867
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (31,323)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (11,863)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (19,460)
<DISCONTINUED>                                (12,572)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (32,032)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.45)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                  1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                413633
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   6721939
<RECEIVABLES>                                  (162340)
<ALLOWANCES>                                   6176128
<INVENTORY>                                    20817907
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2224559
<PP&E>                                         (1532674)
<DEPRECIATION>                                 32585913
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 12499661
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    67810
<COMMON>                                       18413117
<OTHER-SE>                                     32585913
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   14799375
<SALES>                                        14799375
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               7069174
<CGS>                                          8341926
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               720607
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1036759
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                456105
<INCOME-TAX>                                   580654
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      580654
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0


</TABLE>
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30,2003 (the “Form 10-QSB”) of Cardinal Financial Corporation (the “Company”), I,Bernard H. Clineburg, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, herebycertify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

(a)                                  theForm 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(b)                                 theinformation contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of theCompany and its subsidiaries as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form10-QSB.

 

 
|   | Date:    November 13, 2003 | By:                                                                    | /s/ Bernard H. Clineburg |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|--------|
|   |                                 | Bernard H. Clineburg  Chairman, President and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Galip Vatansever, Appellant.

[771 NYS2d 910]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gary, J.), rendered June 14, 2001, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (four counts), criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

*407Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that he was deprived of his right to a public trial is not preserved for appellate review *(see People v Casper,*287 AD2d 575 [2001]; *People v Torres,*257 AD2d 639 [1999]), and we decline to address it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions in his supplemental pro se brief are without merit. Ritter, J.P., Smith, H. Miller and Mastro, JJ., concur.