alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4160 

To amend title 40, United States Code, to grant the Supreme Court of 

the United States security-related authorities equivalent to the legislative 

and executive branches. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 5, 2022 

Mr. CORNYN (for himself and Mr. COONS) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 40, United States Code, to grant the Supreme 

Court of the United States security-related authorities 

equivalent to the legislative and executive branches. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Supreme Court Police 

5 Parity Act of 2022’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO PROTECT FAMILY MEMBERS. 

7 Section 6121(a)(2) of title 40, United States Code, 

8 is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4160 IS

1 (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

2 the end; 

3 (2) in subparagraph (B), by adding ‘‘and’’ after 

4 the semicolon; and 

5 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(C) any member of the immediate family 

7 of the Chief Justice, any Associate Justice, or 

8 any officer of the Supreme Court if the Marshal 

9 determines such protection is necessary.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 55 (Wednesday, March 22, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15129]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6958]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Science Board Task Force on Defense Mapping for Future 
Operations

ACTION: Notice of Advisory Committee meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board Task Force on Defense Mapping for 
Future Operations will meet in closed session on April 6-7, 1995 at the 
Pentagon in Arlington, Virginia.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense through the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition and 
Technology) on scientific and technical matters as they affect the 
perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At this meeting the Task 
Force will develop recommendations for implementing a cost-effective 
approach for providing geospatial information and products to 
Department of Defense users.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, P.L. No. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II, (1988)), it has 
been determined that this DSB Task Force meeting, concerns matters 
listed in 5 U.S.C. Sec. 552b(c)(1) (1988), and that accordingly this 
meeting will be closed to the public.

    Dated: March 16, 1995.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register, Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 95-6958 Filed 3-21-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4093 

To amend the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 to reauthorize 

the Muscle Shoals National Heritage Area in the State of Alabama, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 27, 2022 

Mr. TUBERVILLE (for himself and Mr. SHELBY) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 

2009 to reauthorize the Muscle Shoals National Heritage 

Area in the State of Alabama, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Muscle Shoals Na5 tional Heritage Area Reauthorization Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF MUSCLE SHOALS NATIONAL 

7 HERITAGE AREA IN THE STATE OF ALABAMA. 

8 Section 8009(j) of the Omnibus Public Land Man9 agement Act of 2009 (54 U.S.C. 320101 note; Public Law 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4093 IS

1 111–11; 123 Stat. 1282) is amended by striking ‘‘the date 

2 that is 15 years after the date of enactment of this Act’’ 

3 and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2036’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 36 (Thursday, February 23, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10083-10084]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4350]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Marshall & Iisley Corporation; Notice of Application to Engage de 
novo in Permissible Nonbanking Activities

    The company listed in this notice has filed an application under 
Sec.  225.23(a)(1) of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.23(a)(1)) 
for the Board's approval under section 4(c)(8) of the Bank Holding 
Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843(c)(8)) and Sec.  225.21(a) of Regulation Y 
(12 CFR 225.21(a)) to commence or to engage de novo, either directly or 
through a subsidiary, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in Sec.  
225.25 of Regulation Y as closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, such activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    The application is available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. Once the application has been accepted 
for processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing on the question whether consummation of the proposal can 
``reasonably be expected to produce benefits to the public, such as 
greater convenience, increased competition, or gains in efficiency, 
that outweigh possible adverse effects, such as undue concentration of 
resources, decreased or unfair competition, [[Page 10084]] conflicts of 
interests, or unsound banking practices.'' Any request for a hearing on 
this question must be accompanied by a statement of the reasons a 
written presentation would not suffice in lieu of a hearing, 
identifying specifically any questions of fact that are in dispute, 
summarizing the evidence that would be presented at a hearing, and 
indicating how the party commenting would be aggrieved by approval of 
the proposal.
    Comments regarding the application must be received at the Reserve 
Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than 
March 8, 1995.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (James A. Bluemle, Vice 
President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690:
    1. Marshall & Iisley, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; to acquire a 50 percent 
interest in a newly formed company and thereby engage de novo in the 
marketing of data processing and transmission services, pursuant to 
Sec.  225.25(b)(7) of the Board's Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 16, 
1995.
William W. Wiles,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-4350 Filed 2-22-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 7, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40997

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE MARTIN MIRELES-GONZALEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 5:05-CR-1698

--------------------

Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Martin

Mireles-Gonzalez raises arguments that are foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998),

which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and

not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for

summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       3,727,724
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               18,597,703
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (652,000)
<INVENTORY>                                 67,891,889
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            92,693,729
<PP&E>                                      37,101,112
<DEPRECIATION>                            (16,071,909)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             165,232,326
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       64,110,665
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       172,252
<OTHER-SE>                                  95,994,760
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               165,232,326
<SALES>                                    124,813,563
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           124,813,563
<CGS>                                       79,165,067
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               79,165,067
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            31,853,794
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             258,197
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             13,536,505
<INCOME-TAX>                                 5,414,602
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          8,121,903
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 8,121,903
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .48


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>             9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                       APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                     4,042
<SECURITIES>                              26,198
<RECEIVABLES>                              9,513
<ALLOWANCES>                                 740
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          40,300
<PP&E>                                     4,646
<DEPRECIATION>                             2,387
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            42,630
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     17,209
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                     104
<OTHER-SE>                                24,465
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              42,630
<SALES>                                   28,658
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          28,658
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              8,594
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          23,303
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            15
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (2,384)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (2,884)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                             (2,884)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (.35)


</TABLE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-11602

Caterpillar Inc: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions.

pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
See T EX . R. A PP . P

. 52. 8( d) ( “ W hen deny i ng r el i ef , t he cour t m ay han d do w n an opi ni on b ut 1 i s n o t r e q u i re d to d o s o .”) ; T EX . R. A PP . P . 4 7 .4 (d i s ti n g u i s h i n g o p i n i o n s a n d m e m o ra n d u m o p i n i o n s ). 

### NU M BER 13- 08- 608- CV 

## COURT OF A PP EA LS T H I R T E E N T H D I S T R I C T O F T E XAS CORPUS CHRI ST I -E DI NBURG IN RE KRISTI NE FERNA NDEZ AS NEXT FRIEND OF J.D. T.

On Peti tion for Wr it of M andamus 

## MEM ORA N D U M OPINION Be fo re C hie f J us tice Vald ez an d Ju stice s R od rigu ez an d Be na v ide s

Per Curia m M emorandum Opini on 1 Rel ator , Kr is ti ne F er nandezas next fri end of min or ch il d, J.D .T., f il ed a peti ti on for w ri t of mandamusi n the abov e caus e on October 30, 2008. The C our t, hav ing examined and full y co nsi dered th e pet it ion for w ri t of mandamus , i s o f the opini on that rel ator has not show n hersel f entit led to the reli ef soug ht. Ac cordin g ly , t he pet it ion for w ri t of mandamus isD EN IED

. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 52.8( a)

. P E RC U R I A M Me moran dum Opi nio n del ivered and filed thi s 6 th da y

of November , 200 8.
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. John TODD, Defendant/Appellant. John TODD, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

Nos. 62526, 63983.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

March 22, 1994.

S. Paige Canfield, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

*176Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Mary Moulton Bryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of robbery in the first degree, § 569.020, RSMo 1986, and the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evi-dentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 7001** 

SHARU BEY , Petitioner

– Appellant ,
v. WARDEN GERRI LEVISTER , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh
. Louise W. Flanagan , District Judge. ( 5:12

- hc

- 02266

- FL )

Submitted : October 25, 2013 Decided: October 31, 2013

Before DAVIS, WYNN, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Sharu Bey, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Sharu Bey , a federal prisoner, appeals the district
court ’ s order s denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2013) petition and denying reco nsideration . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Bey v. Warden Gerri Levister , No. 5:12

- hc

- 02266

- FL (E.D.N.C . Jan. 24 & May 31, 2013) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JEFFERY CHANDLER LEE

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 16

- 00332

- C R

Appeal from the

340 th District Court

o f Tom Green County , Texas

(TC# C

- 15

- 0653

- SB )

O R D E R

Appellant’s pro se motion for access to the appellate record is GRANTED

. Therefore, it

is ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court, forward a paper copy of the clerk’s record and reporter’s

record, and any supplemental records, to the Warden of the Tulia Unit, 4000 Hwy 86 West, Tulia,

Texas 79088 . The record shall be made availa ble to Appellant (TDCJ #02105050 ), under the

supervision of the Law Librarian or designee, for his review and use in preparing a brief. Further,

it is not necessary for the record to be returned to this Court and it may be destroyed by the Warden

after Appellant has filed his brief. Fu rther, the appellant’s brief is due on or before June 15, 2017

.

I T IS SO ORDERED this 1 st day of May

, 20 1 7

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., R odriguez and Palafox , JJ.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2166

Primex Family of Companies:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 56 (Thursday, March 23, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15297]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7156]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[WY-920-41-5700; WYW102690]


Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease

    Pursuant to the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 
3108.2-3(a) and (b)(1), a petition for reinstatement of oil and gas 
lease WYW1027690 for lands in Sublette County, Wyoming, was timely 
filed and was accompanied by all the required rentals accruing from the 
date of termination. The lessee has agreed to the amended lease terms 
for rentals and royalties at rates of $5.00 per acre, or fraction 
thereof, per year and 16\2/3\ percent, respectively.
    The lessee has paid the required $500 administrative fee and $125 
to reimburse the Department for the cost of this Federal Register 
notice. The lessee has met all the requirements for reinstatement of 
the lease as set out in Section 31 (d) and (e) of the Minerals Lands 
Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land Management 
is proposing to reinstate lease WYW102690 effective December 1, 1994, 
subject to the original terms and conditions of the lease and increased 
rental and royalty rates cited above.
Pamela J. Lewis,
Supervisory Land Law Examiner.
[FR Doc. 95-7156 Filed 3-22-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                                                                      Exhibit 27

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AS FILED
AS PART OF THE ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.  
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           NOV-2-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                NOV-1-1997
<CASH>                                           7,395
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,116
<ALLOWANCES>                                       190
<INVENTORY>                                     71,368
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               118,269
<PP&E>                                         107,179
<DEPRECIATION>                                  39,181
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 188,703
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           50,755
<BONDS>                                         26,649
<COMMON>                                            99
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      88,969
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   188,703
<SALES>                                        274,788
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               277,630
<CGS>                                          215,429
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   69,119
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   315
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,576
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,270
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,394
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,795
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (330)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,465
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.07

        

</TABLE>