alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 57 (Friday, March 24, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 15496]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7299]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 94-15; RM-8411]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Ravenswood and Elizabeth, West 
Virginia

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission, at the request of MediaCom, Inc., reallots 
Channel 291A from Ravenswood to Elizabeth, West Virginia, as that 
community's first local aural transmission service, and modifies 
Station WRZZ(FM)'s license accordingly. See 59 FR 10607, March 7, 1994. 
Channel 291A can be allotted to Elizabeth in compliance with the 
Commission's minimum distance separation requirements without the 
imposition of a site restriction. The coordinates for Channel 291A at 
Elizabeth are 39-03-48 and West Longitude 81-23-43. Since Elizabeth is 
located within 320 kilometers (200 miles) of the U.S.-Canadian border, 
concurrence of the Canadian government has been obtained. With this 
action, this proceeding is terminated.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 4, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sharon P. McDonald, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 94-15, adopted March 14, 1995, and 
released March 21, 1995. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW, Washington, 
D.C. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractors, International Transcription Service, 
Inc., (202) 857-3800, 2100 M Street, NW, Suite 140, Washington, D.C. 
20037.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

    Part 73 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: Sections 303, 48 Stat., as amended, 1082; 47 U.S.C. 
154, as amended.


Sec. 73.202   [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under West 
Virginia, is amended by removing Channel 291A at Ravenswood and adding 
Elizabeth, Channel 291A.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 95-7299 Filed 3-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1702

JOHN G. SINGLETARY, JR.; CARLA C. SINGLETARY,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

CITY OF NORTH CHARLESTON; CITY OF NORTH CHARLESTON ZONING 

DEPARTMENT; CITY OF NORTH CHARLESTON ZONING BOARD OF 

APPEALS; CITY OF NORTH CHARLESTON LEGAL DEPARTMENT; R. KEITH 

SUMMEY, City of North Charleston Mayor; DARBIS BRIGGMAN, 

City of North Charleston Chief Building Official; WILLIAM B. 

GORE, Zoning Director; RICK WILLIAMS, Building Inspector; 

MARY COHEN, Zoning Inspector; ADRIENNE WILLIAMS, Secretary 

Zoning Board of Appeals; DONALD SCHAEFFER, ZBA Vice Chairman 

and May 5, 2009 Acting ZBA Chair,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Charleston. Richard Mark Gergel, District 

Judge. (2:09-cv-01612-RMG)

Submitted: September 27, 2012 Decided: October 1, 2012

Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John G. Singletary, Jr. and Carla C. Singletary, Appellants Pro 

Se. Robin Lilley Jackson, SENN, MCDONALD & LEINBACK, LLC, 

Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

John G. Singletary, Jr., and Carla C. Singletary 

appeal from the district court’s orders accepting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief in 

their civil action arising out of the denial of their request 

for a zoning variance. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. Singletary v. North Charleston, No. 

2:09-cv-01612-RMG (D.S.C. Apr. 16, 2012; May 17, 2012). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 8 (Thursday, January 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2949-2950]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-731]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[I.D. 121294A]


Marine Mammals

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Issuance of modification to permit Nos. 704 (P77#39), 684 
(P77#35), 591 (P77#26), and 711 (P77#43).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that on December 22, 1994, the above 
permits issued to the Southwest Fisheries Science Center, NMFS, NOAA, 
P.O. Box 271, La Jolla, CA 92038-0271, were modified to extend the 
expiration dates through December 31, 1995.

ADDRESSES: The modifications and related documents are available for 
review upon written request or by appointment in the following offices:
    Permits Division, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, 1315 East-
West Highway, Room 13130, Silver Spring, MD 20910 (301/713-2289); and
    Southwest Region, NMFS, 501 W. Ocean Boulevard, Suite 4200, Long 
Beach, CA 90802-4213 (310/980-4015).

[[Page 2950]] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The subject modifications have 
been issued under the authority of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 
1972, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.), the provisions of 
Secs. 216.33 (d) and (e) of the Regulations Governing the Taking and 
Importing of Marine Mammals (50 CFR part 216), the Endangered Species 
Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), and the provisions of 
Sec. 222.25 of the regulations governing the taking, importing, and 
exporting of endangered fish and wildlife (50 CFR part 222).
    Issuance of this permit, as required by the Endangered Species Act 
of 1973, was based on a finding that such permit: (1) Was applied for 
in good faith; (2) will not operate to the disadvantage of the 
endangered species which is the subject of this permit; and (3) is 
consistent with the purposes and policies set forth in section 2 of the 
Endangered Species Act.

    Dated: December 22, 1994.
William W. Fox, Jr.,
Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries 
Service.
[FR Doc. 95-731 Filed 1-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2788

Dayco Products, LLC:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_05.09.19.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3265

Speck Pumps-Pool Products, Inc: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions.

pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2696

Price Pump Company:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4470

OMRON Management Center of America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA RE; Docket Number 2023 - CA - 0250 Anastassia TrombettasVersus - - 

### Angela Cox Williams, Amanda Desormeaux, and Donna Nevels 22nd Judicial District Court Case #: 202211833 

### St. Tammany Parish

On Application for Rehearing filed on 09129/2023 By AnastassiaTrombettas 4 

### Rehearing _ _ _.

Date Rodd Naquin, 

## 19 2023
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 7 (Wednesday, January 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2806-2807]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-689]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee Meeting on General 
Aviation and Business Airplane Issues

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of the Federal Aviation Administration's Aviation Rulemaking 
Advisory Committee to discuss general aviation and business airplane 
issues.

DATES: The meeting will be held on February 6, 1995, at 1:30 p.m. 
Arrange for oral presentations by January 30, 1995.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the General Aviation 
Manufacturers Association headquarters, Suite 801, 1400 K Street NW., 
Washington, DC 20005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Carolina Forrester, Office of Rulemaking, FAA, 800 Independence Avenue, 
SW. Washington, DC 20591, telephone (202) 267-9690.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-

[[Page 2807]]

463; 5 U.S.C. App. II), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the 
Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee to be held on February 6, 1995, 
at the General Aviation Manufacturers Association, Suite 801, 1400 K 
Street NW., Washington, DC 20005. The agenda for the meeting will 
include:
    <bullet> Opening Remarks.
    <bullet> Review of Issues.
    <bullet> Update on Accelerated Stalls.
    <bullet> Update on Fuel Pressure.
    <bullet> Discussion of Future Tasks.
    <bullet> Schedule Future Meetings.
    Attendance is open to the interested public, but will be limited to 
the space available. The public must make arrangements by January 30, 
1995, to present oral statements at the meeting. The public may present 
written statements to the committee, at any time, by providing 25 
copies to the Assistant Executive Director, or by bringing the copies 
to him at the meeting. Arrangements may be made by contacting the 
person listed under the heading FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
    Sign and oral interpretation can be made available at the meeting, 
as well as an assistive listening device, if requested 10 calendar days 
before the meeting.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri on December 12, 1994.
John R. Colomy,
Assistant Executive Director for General Aviation and Business Airplane 
Issues, Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 95-689 Filed 1-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
### TEXA S COU RT O F AP PEAL S, THIR D DISTRIC T, AT AU STIN

NO. 03-01-00451-CR

Donald Lynn Wil

liam s, Appel

lant
v. The State of Texas , Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF BELL COUNTY, 27TH JUDICIAL DIS TRICT NO. 49,709, HONORABLE JOE CARROLL, JUDGE PRESIDING

Af ter re vok ingapp ellant Don al d L y n n W i l l i am s’ s def er re d adj udi ca

ti on com m un i ty sup er vision, the dis

trict court adj udged hi

m gui lty of i ndecen cy with a chi ld b y c ontact and sentenced him to twelv e y ears i n pr i son. SeeTex. P en. Co de Ann. § 21. 11 (West Supp . 200 2). Appellant’s court -appointed

atto rney fi le d a brief conc l udi ng th at thi s ap peal i s f ri vol ous an d wi thout m eri t. The brief mee t s t he r eq uir eme nt s o f Ander s v. Califor

nia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967) , by presenti ng a professi onal eval uation of the record dem ons t ra t ing why t her e ar e no ar gua ble gr ou nds t o be advan ced. Seealso Pens on v. Ohio , 48 8 U. S. 75 ( 198 8); High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807 ( T ex . Cr im. App. 197 8); Curr

ie v. State , 516 S.W.2d 684 (T ex. Crim. App. 197 4); Jacks on v. State , 485 S.W.2d55 3 ( T ex . Cr im. App. 197 2); Gainous

v. State , 436 S.W .2d 137(Tex . Cri m . App. 1969 ). A copy of couns el ’s b

rief was de liver ed t o ap pe llant , an d a pp ella nt wa s a dv ise d o f his righ t t o exam in e the appel

la te recor d and to file

a pro se brie f. No pro se bri ef h as been fi le d.2 We have r eviewe d t he record and counsel ’s b rief and agree that the appeal

is fri volous and wi thout m eri t. We find not hing in the reco rd t hat might argu ably suppo rt the ap peal. Co unsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

The j udgme

nt of convi

ction i s af fi rmed.

__________________________________________ Mack Ki dd, Justice Be f ore J us ti ce s K i dd, Ye akel

an d Pa tters on Af fi rmed File d: January

10, 2002 Do No t Publis

h
#### Janet SHARP, Appellant, v. Gwendolyn GANT, et al., Respondent.

No. WD 45957.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Nov. 3, 1992.

Richard L. Colbert, Kansas City, for appellant.

Paul T. Miller, Kansas City, for respondent.

Before LOWENSTEIN, C.J., and BERREY and BRECKENRIDGE, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of respondent Gant and against appellant Sharp.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
<PAGE>   1

                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.10

                                PROMISSORY NOTE



$308,203.00

Date: April 1, 1997


         After date, for value received, the undersigned as principles promise
to pay OrganiGro, Inc. and Synagro Technologies, Inc. the sum of Three Hundred
Eight Thousand Two Hundred Three Dollars ($308,203), with interest of 6% per
annum.

         This note is in connection with the certain sale and purchase
agreement dated March 31, 1997 for all of the assets of Hodges Heavy Duty Truck
Repair.  It is understood that this note agreement is for a period of sixty
(60) months or five years with the first cash payment payable one (1) year from
the date of this agreement in monthly installments thereafter.

         It is agreed by all parties to this note, both makers and payees, that
the monthly amount payable will be determined at the end of the first year
after all consideration for right of offset for those services provided per the
sale and purchase agreement articles 4 and 5.  Thereafter, the payments will be
Three Thousand Seven Hundred Dollars ($3,700.00) monthly with the remaining
balance due March 31, 2002, see the attached amortization schedule.

         The makers and endorsers of this note hereby severally waive the
presentation for payment, notice of nonpayment without notice of protest, and
consent to extension of time of payment without notice thereof.  Should the
makers and endorsers of this note become thirty (30) days late on any payment,
the principal has the option to foreclose on said note and mortgage if they
elect to do so.  Furthermore, should the guarantors and principals of this note
fail to comply with all notes subsequently financed for purposes of complying
with the debt assumption per article 2A of the sale and purchase agreement, any
payment not made pursuant to the bank arrangements would be considered a
default of this note agreement, as well, also known as a cross default
provision.

         Should it become necessary for the payee to institute legal action for
the collection of this note, the makers and endorsers hereby agree to pay
reasonable attorneys fees in the collection of and enforcement of this note.


HODGES HEAVY DUTY TRUCK REPAIR, INC.


/s/ Jack Hodges                            /s/ Tony D. Childers     
---------------------------------          -------------------------------------
Its President                              Tony D. Childers, an individual
                                        
                                        
                                        
ATTEST: /s/ Tony D. Childers               /s/ Jack Hodges                  
        -------------------------          -------------------------------------
                                           Jack Hodges, an individual