alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3903

Helen of Troy:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                           STATER BROS. HOLDINGS INC.

                    Calculation of Earnings Per Common Share
          (In thousands, except number of shares and per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             Fiscal Years Ended
                                                     ----------------------------------
                                                       1997         1998          1999
                                                     -------      -------      --------
<S>                                                  <C>          <C>          <C>
Net income before extraordinary (loss)               $13,467      $ 2,531      $  8,279

Extraordinary (loss) from early extinguishment
   of debt ($28,544 less tax effect of $11,233)           --           --       (17,311)
                                                     -------      -------      --------

Net income (loss)                                     13,467        2,531        (9,032)

Less preferred dividends                               6,166           --            --
                                                     -------      -------      --------

Net income (loss) available
   to common shareholders                            $ 7,301      $ 2,531      $ (9,032)
                                                     =======      =======      ========

Earnings (loss) per common share:
   Before extraordinary (loss)                       $146.02      $ 50.62      $ 165.58
   Extraordinary (loss)                                   --           --       (346.22)
                                                     -------      -------      --------
Earnings (loss) per common share:                    $146.02      $ 50.62      $(180.64)
                                                     =======      =======      ========

Average common shares outstanding                     50,000       50,000        50,000
                                                     =======      =======      ========

Common shares outstanding
   at end of fiscal year                              50,000       50,000        50,000
                                                     =======      =======      ========
</TABLE>
#### Carmella Guastamacchia, Appellant, v New York *588City Department of Transportation et al., Respondents.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garry, J.), dated April 11, 1989, which denied her motion for leave to file a late notice of claim.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff’s application for leave to file a late notice of claim was not made within one year and 90 days after the claim accrued. As a result, the Supreme Court properly concluded that it was without discretion to grant the relief requested *(see,*General Municipal Law § 50-e [5]; *Pierson v City of New York,*56 NY2d 950; *Cohen v Pearl Riv. Union Free School Dist.,*51 NY2d 256; *Binyard v City of New York,*151 AD2d 712). We note, moreover, that the plaintiff’s untimely application cannot be deemed to relate back to a prior motion *(see, Matter of Lopez v City of New York,*123 AD2d 765; *Thomas v City of New York,*102 AD2d 867; *Stoute v City of New York,*91 AD2d 1043, *appeal dismissed*59 NY2d 602). Thompson, J. P., Brown, Eiber and Miller, JJ., concur.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3884

Quality Vision International, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

“Made in China 2025” or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

TREON TARIQ MORGAN

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No s . 4D 20

- 969 and 4D20

- 971

[ February 4, 2021 ]

CORRECTED OPINION

Consolidated a ppeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial

Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Jeffrey Dana Gillen , Judge; L.T. Case No s

. 502019CF000405AXXXMB and 502019CF001155AXXXMB

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Benjamin Eisenberg,

Assistant Public Defend er, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Heidi L. Bettendorf,

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ERBER

, F ORST and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-1744

Advantest America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         882074
<NAME>                        PANACO, Inc.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<CASH>                                           1,736,000
<SECURITIES>                                     1,642,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,197,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,999,000
<PP&E>                                         135,817,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                  82,198,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  73,768,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,770,000
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           143,000
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,059,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    73,768,000
<SALES>                                         20,063,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,063,000
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,330,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,772,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,039,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2,039,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,039,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.16)



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 8 (Thursday, January 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3027-3028]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-710]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


UNITED STATES INFORMATION AGENCY

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition; 
Determination

    Notice is hereby given of the following determination: Pursuant to 
the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 
985, 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978 (43 F.R. 
13359, March 29, 1978), and Delegation Order No. 85-5 of June 27, 1985 
(50 F.R. 27393, July 2, 1985), I hereby determine that the objects to 
be included in the exhibit, ``Visions of Love and Life: PRE-RAPHAELITE 
ART from the Birmingham Collection, England.'' (See list\1\), imported 
from abroad for the temporary exhibition without profit within the 
United States, are of cultural significance. These objects are imported 
pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign lenders. I also determine 
that the temporary exhibition or display of the listed exhibit objects 
at the Asian Art Museum of Modern Art of San [[Page 3028]] Francisco, 
from on or about February 28, 1995 through April 30, 1995, and at the 
Seattle Art Museum, Seattle, Washington, from on or about September 9, 
1995 through March 31, 1996, and at the Peabody Essex Museum of Salem, 
Massachusetts, from on or about April 25, 1996 through July 22, 1996, 
is in the national interest. Public Notice of this determination is 
ordered to be published in the Federal Register

    \1\A copy of this list may be obtained by contacting Mr. Paul W. 
Manning, Assistant General Counsel, at 619-5997, and the address is 
Room 700, U.S. Information Agency, 301 Fourth Street, S.W., 
Washington, D.C. 20547.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Dated: January 6, 1995.
Les Jin,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 95-710 Filed 1-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8230-30-M
3XEOLF9HUVLRQRI%&,

3803%5$&.(7&$67,1*35(6685(&217$,1,1*+7&$67,521



3,$==$52%(57

35,&(3803&203$1<

2WKHU

12

3XEOLF9HUVLRQRI%&,
 .*

<(6

12

 .*

 .*

,03257,1*7+,63$57)520&+,1$&2676

385&+$6,1*'20(67,&$//<&267
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2303

General Tools:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 47 (Friday, March 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 13207]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5874]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Public Information Collection Requirements Submitted to OMB for 
Review

March 2, 1995.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, Public Law 96-511. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

Comptroller of the Currency (OCC)

    OMB Number: 1557-0124.
    Form Number: TA-1.
    Type of Review: Revision.
    Title: Uniform Form for Registration and Amendment to Registration 
as a Transfer Agent.
    Description: This form is used by national banks and national bank 
subsidiaries for registration and amendment to registration as a 
transfer agent.
    Respondents: Businesses or other for-profit.
    Estimated Number of Recordkeepers: 105.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Recordkeeper: 1 hour, 15 minutes.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Total Recordkeeping Burden: 46 hours.
    Clearance Officer: John Ference (202) 874-4697, Comptroller of the 
Currency, 250 E Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20219.
    OMB Reviewer: Milo Sunderhauf (202) 395-7340, Office of Management 
and Budget, Room 10226, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 
20503.
Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-5874 Filed 3-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-33-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jon Silvers, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Counsel’s application to withdraw granted *(see, People v Crawford,*71 AD2d 38). (Appeal from judgment of Ontario County Court, Henry, J.—criminal sale of controlled substance, third degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Denman, Green, Pine and Lowery, JJ.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2262

Braeburn Systems LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice published at 

83 FR 67463 (‘the exclusion notice’) and posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/2018-28277.pdf.

The scope of your exclusion is governed by the scope of the formal HTSUS product 

description in the Annex to the exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in 

any particular request for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted 

by excluding from the additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description 

contained in the Annex to the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Ex-99.3 a)

                         LIBERTY LENDING SERVICES, INC.
                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE
                        ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

This serves as Liberty Lending Services, Inc. Officer's Certificate/Annual
Statement as to Compliance for the servicing of loans under the Bear Stearns
(SAMI) Structured Asset Mortgage Investments Trust, Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates, Series 1998-10, Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated November 1,
1998 and Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement dated November 1, 1998 with your
concern.


<PAGE>

1. A review of the activities during the proceeding fiscal year and of the
performance with the requirements of the Agreement has been made under the
Officer's supervision.

2. To the best of the Officers' knowledge, based on the above review, Liberty
Lending Services, Inc. has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement
throughout the fiscal year.

3. Real estate taxes have been paid as required by the terms of the mortgage.

4. Mortgage insurance premiums due under the contract of insurance with FHA or
PMI carriers have been paid as required.

5. Insurance is being maintained, is fully paid and complies with the Agreement.
Adequate hazard insurance is in force on all loans as required under this
Agreement. Flood insurance coverage, if required, is in force. If escrowed,
insurance/PMI premiums and taxes/assessment monies have been analyzed, in
accordance with RESPA, to ensure sufficient funds are being collected in escrow
for the current year.

6. Property inspections have been performed as stated in the Agreement, unless
otherwise amended.

7. Appropriate IRS notices were performed in accordance with IRS Regulations.

8. Disbursements from Trust Account funds were made for proper purposes, and all
payments required to be made by the Agreement have been made.

9. Proper fidelity coverage and errors and omissions insurance are in force as
required.

10. Loans with variable rate features have been changed in accordance with terms
of the note.


Liberty Lending Services, Inc. is authorized by applicable law to service the
mortgages, and it has and will continue to satisfy all licensing, registration,
and other requirements of the Agreement. There is, as of this date, no default
in the fulfillment of any of its obligations under the Agreement known to this
Officer. As an Officer of Liberty Lending Services, Inc., individually, I
certify to the best of my knowledge, that the foregoing statements are true and
correct.

                                                          Date: January 27, 2000

/s/ Edward S. Chatfield
----------------------------
Edward S. Chatfield
Vice President
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

KAREN JULIAN and LINDA BERNHARD
, Appellant s ,

v.

MICHAEL SACCOCCIO, ASHLEY CATRON
, and GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee s

.

No. 4D 21

- 2897

[ November 3, 2022 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County ; Gary L. Sweet , Judge; L.T. Case No.

432018CA000482CAAXMX

.

Andrew A. Harris of Harris Appeals, P.A., Palm Beach Gardens, and Gray M. Camfield of the Law Office of Gray M. Cam field, Melbourne, for appellant s

.

Adam A. Duke and Richard A. Weldy of Young, Bill, Boles, Palmer, Duke & Thompson, P.A., Miami, for appellee GEICO.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affi r med.

C IKLIN
, L EVINE and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.