alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 60 (Wednesday, March 29, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 16148]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7633]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Docket No. C-3559]


Sulzer Limited; Prohibited Trade Practices, and Affirmative 
Corrective Actions

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION: Consent order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In settlement of alleged violations of federal law prohibiting 
unfair acts and practices and unfair methods of competition, this 
consent order requires, among other things, Sulzer, a Swiss firm to 
divest, within six months, a copy of all the information necessary to 
purchase ingredients for, to manufacture and to sell aluminum polyester 
powder--equivalent to Sulzer's Amdry 2010--to a Commission-approved 
acquirer. If the divestiture is not completed on time, the consent 
order permits the Commission to appoint a trustee to divest copies of 
both the Amdry 2010 information and all product information relating to 
the acquired firms aluminum polyester powder. In addition, the consent 
order requires the respondent, for ten years, to obtain Commission 
approval before acquiring any assets in the aluminum polyester powder 
market.

DATES: Compalint and Order issued February 23, 1995.\1\

    \1\Copies of the Complaint and the Decision and Order are 
available from the Commission's Public Reference Branch, H-130, 6th 
Street & Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20580.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ann Malester, FTC/S-2224, Washington, DC 20580. (202) 326-2682.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On Thursday, October 13, 1994, there was 
published in the Federal Register, 59 FR 51983, a proposed consent 
agreement with analysis In the Matter of Sulzer Limited, for the 
purpose of soliciting public comment. Interested parties were given 
sixty (60) days in which to submit comments, suggestions or objections 
regarding the proposed form of the order.
    A comment was filed and considered by the Commission. The 
Commission has ordered the issuance of the complaint in the form 
contemplated by the agreement, made its jurisdictional findings and 
entered an order to divest, as set forth in the proposed consent 
agreement, in disposition of this proceeding.

(Sec. 6, 38, Stat. 721; 15 U.S.C. 46. Interpret or apply sec. 5, 38 
Stat. 719, as amended; sec. 7, 38 Stat. 731, as amended; 15 U.S.C. 
45,18).
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-7633 Filed 3-28-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MURFREESBORO BANCORP FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,718
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 4,260
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     17,983
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           8,848
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             8,691
<LOANS>                                         74,859
<ALLOWANCE>                                        935
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 114,769
<DEPOSITS>                                      96,160
<SHORT-TERM>                                     5,539
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,201
<LONG-TERM>                                      3,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,068
<OTHER-SE>                                        (199)
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 114,769
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  4,805
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,123
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   127
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 6,055
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,345
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,730
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,325
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      127
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,422
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    170
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         170
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       119
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.20
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   817
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       10
<RECOVERIES>                                         1
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  935
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               935
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            935


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 63 (Monday, April 3, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 16919]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8142]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Agency Meetings

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, that the Securities and 
Exchange Commission will hold the following meetings during the week of 
April 3, 1995.
    An open meeting will be held on Tuesday, April 4, 1995, at 10:00 
a.m., in Room 1C30. A closed meeting will be held on Thursday, April 6, 
1995, at 10:00 a.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the 
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting. 
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters may also be 
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4), (8), (9)(A) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(4), 
(8), (9)(i) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at 
a closed meeting.
    Commissioner Wallman, as duty officer, voted to consider the items 
listed for the closed meeting in a closed session.
    The subject matter of the open meeting scheduled for Tuesday, April 
4, 1995, at 10:00 a.m., will be:

    The Commission will meet with representatives from the American 
Society of Corporate Secretaries to discuss a number of issues of 
mutual interest, including new developments in shareholder 
communications, the safe harbor concept release, the Section 16 
proposals, shareholder proposals, the T+3/prospectus delivery 
proposals, and the security ratings proposals. For further 
information, please contact William Haseltine at (202) 942-2910.

    The subject matter of the closed meeting scheduled for Thursday, 
April 6, 1995, at 10:00 a.m., will be:

    Institution of injunctive actions.
    Institution of administrative proceedings of an enforcement 
nature.
    Settlement of administrative proceedings of an enforcement 
nature.
    Opinions.
    Post oral argument discussion.

    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, 
please contact: The Office of the Secretary (202) 942-7070.

    Dated: March 29, 1995.
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-8142 Filed 3-29-95; 4:07 pm]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-13-00759-CV

In re Tommy Mobley

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM WILLIAMSON COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

__________________________________________

Scott K. Field, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Field

Filed: December 10, 2013
Organization Name:

Note: Representatives submitting on behalf of an organization must enter information below.

Requestor Representative:

Section 301 Investigation: China's Acts, Policies, and Practices Related to Technology 

Transfer, Intellectual Property, and Innovation - Form to Request Exclusion of Product

When submitting a product exclusion request using this form, enter the specified 

information in the following fields and explain the basis and rationale for your statements. 

By completing this form, you certify that the information provided is complete and 

correct to the best of your knowledge. 

1. Indicate whether the comment contains business confidential information (BCI), is a public

document, or is a public version of a BCI document.

3.

2. Please provide a complete and detailed description of the product of concern:

4.

5. Requestor's relationship to the product:

CONTINUED BELOW

*

10-digit HTSUS item number* for product you wish to address in this product exclusion request:

Use numerical characters only with no special characters (example: 1023456789). For help in finding 

the HTSUS item number associated with your product, see https://hts.usitc.gov/

1

7.

6. Does this submission in regulations.gov include additional attachments?

Please indicate whether any additional attachment contains business confidential

information (BCI), is a public document, or is a public version of a BCI document.

VERSION 1

Requestor Information

Requestor Name (Last, First):

Public Version of BCI

RCH603, 63.6 ton Capacity, 3.00 in Stroke, Single-Acting, Hollow Plunger Hydraulic Cylinder; 

Maximum Operating Pressure psi: 10000; Weight Kgs: 28,1; Oil Capacity Advance cm3: 626; Stroke 

Ranges mm: 48 - 94

8412210075 Schmidt, Jackie Enerpac Jackie SchmidtImporter Yes Contains BCI
END 2

8. Is this product, or a comparable product, available from sources in the United States?:

VERSION 1

11. Please provide information in support your request, taking account of the instructions

provided in Section B of the Federal Register notice (note: text entered below can extend

beyond the apparent size of this box).

9. Is this product, or a comparable product, available from sources in third countries?:

10. Please provide the value and quantity (with units) of the Chinese-origin product of concern

that you purchased for each calendar year specified. Limit this figure to the products

purchased by your firm (or by members of your trade association) alone. Please provide 

estimates if precise figures are unavailable.

2016 Value:

2015 Value:

2017 Value:

2016 Quantity:

2015 Quantity:

2017 Quantity:

No No BCI BCI BCI BCI BCI BCI

See addendum for additional information.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 58 (Monday, March 27, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15789-15790]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7473]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-30,797]


Ace Comb Company, a Division of Goody Products, Inc., Booneville, 
AR; Notice of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on March 13, 1955 in response to a worker petition which 
was filed on March 13, 1995 on behalf of workers at Ace Comb Company (A 
Division of Goody Products, Incorporated), Booneville, Arkansas.
    The petitioning group of workers is subject to an ongoing 
investigation for which a determination has not yet been issued (TA-W-
30,777). Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve 
no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

    [[Page 15790]] Signed in Washington, D.C. this 14th day of 
March, 1995.
Victor J. Trunzo,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 95-7473 Filed 3-24-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5430

Radio Systems Corp:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

“Made in China 2025” or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4644

SPM Flow Control, Inc. DBA Weir SPM:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
ex10_3.htm








Exhibit 10.3







DISBURSEMENT REQUEST AND AUTHORIZATION







This Disbursement Request and Authorization is hereby delivered to RABOBANK, N.A. (hereinafter referred to as “Lender”) by the undersigned (hereinafter referred to as “Borrower”), in reference to the following:







1.           Lender and Borrower have entered into that certain Credit Agreement dated concurrently herewith (the “Loan Agreement”), whereby Lender has agreed to make a loan to Borrower in the amount of $20,000,000.00 (the “Loan”), on the terms and for the purposes set forth in the Loan Agreement, which is hereby incorporated herein by this reference.







2.           The Loan is evidenced by a promissory note (the “Note”) ( together with the Loan Agreement, the “Loan Documents”), executed by the Borrower in favor of Lender.







3.           Borrower understands that none of the proceeds of the Loan will be distributed until all of the Lender’s conditions for making the Loan have been satisfied.







In consideration of the foregoing, Borrower hereby requests and authorizes Lender to disburse proceeds of the Loan in the following manner:








	
Undisbursed Proceeds

	 	$	20,000,000.00	 
	
Total:

	 	$	20,000,000.00	 
	
Note Principal

	 	$	20,000,000.00	 
















	
Charges Paid in Cash

	 	 	 
	
Loan Processing Fee

	 	$	500.00	 
	
Legal Fees

	 	$	6,000.00	 
	
Total Charges Paid in Cash:

	 	$	6,500.00	 










By signing this authorization, Borrower represents and warrants to Lender that the information provided above is true and correct and that there has been no material adverse change in Borrower’s financial condition as disclosed in Borrower’s most recent financial statement to Lender. This Authorization is dated as of July 8, 2011.








	
“BORROWER”

	
QAD INC.,


	  	
a Delaware corporation


	  	  	  
	  	
By:

	
/s/ DANIEL LENDER


	  	
Name:

	
Daniel Lender


	  	
Title:

	
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary


	  	  	  
	  	  	  
	  	
By:

	
/s/ JOHN NEALE


	  	
Name:

	
John Neale


	  	
Title:

	
Senior Vice President and Treasurer
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 41033 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

BERNARDO RODRIGUEZ

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:18

- CR

- 258

- 2

Before DENNIS, OWEN, and HO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Bernardo Rodriguez has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California

, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Rodriguez h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s br ief and the
relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 5, 2019
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-41033 Document: 00515022674 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/05/2019No. 18

- 41033

2 Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused fro m further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 18-41033 Document: 00515022674 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/05/2019
NUMBER 13-12-00031-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE BOBBY BOURLON

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam1

Relator, Bobby Bourlon, filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for 

emergency stay in the above cause on January 20, 2012. Through the petition for writ 

of mandamus, relator sought to compel the trial court to vacate an order rendered on 

December 15, 2011 granting a pre-suit deposition under Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 

202. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 202. On January 20, 2012, this Court granted the motion for 

emergency stay and ordered the trial court’s December 15, 2011 order to be stayed. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(b). By that same order, the Court requested that the real 

 

1

See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is 

not required to do so.”); TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).
2

party in interest, Charlotte Clark, by and through counsel, file a response to the petition 

for writ of mandamus. Relator has now filed a motion to dismiss this original proceeding 

on grounds that the parties have resolved the issues herein and this matter has been 

rendered moot. 

The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of 

mandamus and the motion to dismiss, is of the opinion that the motion to dismiss should 

be granted. Accordingly, the stay previously imposed by this Court is LIFTED. See id. 

R. 52.10(b) (“Unless vacated or modified, an order granting temporary relief is effective 

until the case is finally decided.”). The motion to dismiss is GRANTED. The petition for 

writ of mandamus is DISMISSED without reference to the merits. See id. R. 52.8(a). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

6th day of February, 2012.
**Exhibit 21**

**SUBSIDIARIES OF SHOE CARNIVAL, INC.**

| **Subsidiary**              |   | **State of   Incorporation/Organization** |   | **Percentage   of Ownership** |
|-----------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
|                             |   |                                           |   |                               |
| SCHC, Inc.                  |   | Delaware                                  |   | 100%                          |
| SCLC, Inc.                  |   | Delaware                                  |   | 100% Owned by SCHC,   Inc.    |
| Shoe Carnival Ventures, LLC |   | Indiana                                   |   | 100%                          |
FIRST SUPPLEMENT DATED MARCH 31, 2000 TO THE

                 CONFIDENTIAL PRIVATE PLACEMENT MEMORANDUM DATED

                                FEBRUARY 25, 2000

                   FLORIDA LITHOTRIPTERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I

                  Lithotripters,  Inc., a North Carolina corporation  ("Litho"),
by this First Supplement hereby amends and supplements its Confidential  Private
Placement  Memorandum  dated February 25, 2000 (the  "Memorandum").  Capitalized
terms used  herein are  defined in the  Glossary  appearing  in the  Memorandum.
Persons who have  subscribed  for or are  considering an investment in the Units
offered by the Memorandum should carefully review this First Supplement.

Extension of the Offering

                  Pursuant to the authority given to Litho in the Memorandum, it
hereby  elects to extend the  offering  termination  date to April 14,  2000 (or
earlier in the  discretion  of Litho,  upon the sale of all Units as provided in
the Memorandum).