alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Smith, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 1.)

unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The court did not err in failing to invoke the procedures for determining defendant’s competency (CPL art 730). Review of the record indicates that there was no reasonable basis for doubting defendant’s mental capacity at any time during the course of his plea and sentencing. Additionally, there was no error in the plea proceedings. (Appeal from judgment of Onondaga County Court, Cunningham, J.—grand larceny, second degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Denman, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3360

Enerpac:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 55 (Wednesday, March 22, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15122]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6961]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service


Zaca Mine Project Toiyabe National Forest, Alpine County, 
California

AGENCY: Forest Service.

ACTION: Cancellation of notice of intent to prepare an environmental 
impact statement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Agriculture, Forest Service and Alpine 
County Planning Department have cancelled preparation of an 
Environmental Impact Statement/Report (EIS/EIR) for the Zaca Mine 
Project following withdrawal of the proposal by Western States Minerals 
Corporation. Public comments regarding this project are no longer 
needed. The Notice of Intent to Prepare an EIS was originally published 
on February 8, 1995 in the Federal Register, Volume 60, NO. 26, pages 
7518-7519.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Questions regarding this notice may be directed to Maureen Joplin, 
Project Team Leader, Toiyabe National Forest, 1200 Franklin Way, 
Sparks, NV, 89431; telephone: 702-355-5394.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Western States Minerals Corporation (WSM) 
has withdrawn its proposed Plan of Operations (POO) for an open pit/
cyanide heap leach gold/silver mine in Alpine County, California. The 
project would have been located approximately four miles southeast of 
Markleeville in sections 29, 30, 31 and 32, T1ON R21E, M.D.M. Total 
area of proposed disturbances was 228 acres. Forest Service and Alpine 
County were in the process of collecting comments from other agencies 
and the public when WSM withdrew its proposed plan. WSM offered the 
following statement: ``Western States Minerals Corporation has decided 
to discontinue permitting of its wholly owned Zaca Project at this 
time. This decision is based entirely upon economic reasons. The 
Company has other Projects that it will develop at this time, because 
they appear to be more economically viable in the present business 
climate. Western States Minerals Corporation fully intends to develop 
the Zaca Project at some future date.''

    Dated: March 10, 1995.
Gary Sayer,
Deputy Forest Supervisor, Toiyabe National Forest.
[FR Doc. 95-6961 Filed 3-21-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7100 JIMMY BOWMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BISHOP KNOTT, Jr., individually and in his official capacity as Clerk of Prince George County Circuit Court, Defendant - Appellee, and HELEN H. FAHEY, individually as Chairperson of the Virginia Parole Board; DARNLEY R. HODGE, individually as the Superintendent of the Riverside Regional Jail, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:06-cv-00309-REP) Submitted: January 17, 2008 Decided: January 23, 2008 Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jimmy Bowman, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Jimmy Bowman appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and conclude that the Appellee was entitled to derivative absolute judicial immunity. McCray v. Maryland , 456 F.2d 1, 5 (4th Cir. 1972). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
PUBLIC VERSION Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
$[*********] [******]

$[*********]

INPUT

20.0

$[*********]

[******]

[******]

0.05

PUBLIC VERSION
Consistent with USTR's Section 301 notice, OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. requests

confidential treatment for the information designated as business confidential in this submission. Such

information consists of information that would not customarily be released to the public, including

business or trade secrets regarding production costs and processes, data on sales, product characteristics

customers, destinations, and other product, sales, and cost-related business secrets. Business confidential

information has been indicated herein by enclosing it in single brackets (“[ ]”). A public version of these

comments is also being filed with all confidential information removed.

OMRON in the US is the only designer of this product and only supplier of this component.

KNOB POWER SEAT SWITCH is a molded plastic switch cover, and is used only for automotive

purposes of actuating power seat switches, of which is an OEM-specified dimension. It is only used for

further assembly of components which go into domestic automobile production, which is specified by

auto manufacturer.

This product is not a target of the US Administration's 301 investigation regarding Intellectual Property

concerns. This is not a concern to IP transfer and impressment. This product contains no IP of interest

related to autonomous vehicle production.

The tariff action ultimately poses a risk of significant damage to OMRON, the domestic automobile

industry, and ultimately the US consumer as a increase in price. Like in the case of similar approvals for

vehicle components at the HTS level, OMRON views this product in the same manner. Immediate

movement of production to a US manufacturer or another country would pose significant re-tooling

costs, significant amounts of time, and approvals pertaining to consumer automobile safety standards are

costly and would take a significant amount of time to obtain.

OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. believes that CBP can easily exclude the KNOB POWER

SEAT SWITCH in question based solely on the product description. The following are draft CBP

exclusion instructions:

"KNOB POWER SEAT SWITCH rectangular plastic knob with rounded ends with two flat latches on

either end which run parallel to the length of the knob "Plastic Bench knob (black) Made of plastic resin -

ABS with jet black paint " Dimensions 61.00 mm X 20.00 mm X 11.80 mm"

This information will be contained on the invoice from the supplier.

PUBLIC VERSION
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5002

OMRON Management Center of America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                            3,348
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1,488
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      0
<PP&E>                                          149,187
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (8,421)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  152,529
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 0
<BONDS>                                         106,542
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                             29
<OTHER-SE>                                       33,124
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    152,529
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  6,775
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  4,792
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2,520
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (464)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (464)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (0.16)



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of China Aoxing Pharmaceutical Company, Inc. (the Company) certifies that: 1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period  ended March 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  May 15, 2007 /s/ Zhenjiang Yue Zhenjiang Yue, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
##### 



1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Howard M. SipznerHoward M. SipznerExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate: August 8, 2007
 
 *
    
    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to Brandywine Realty Trust and will be retained by Brandywine Realty Trust and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### M.S.S., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. D.D., Respondent/Respondent.

No. 68059.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Dec. 26, 1995.

Wittner, Poger, Rosenblum & Spewak, P.C., Barbara L. Greenberg, St. Louis, for appellant.

Allan F. Stewart, Catherine W. Keefe, Braun, Stewart & Keefe, P.C., Clayton, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and DOWD, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Natural father appeals from the trial court’s order denying his motion to set aside his consent to the adoption of his child. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the trial court are not erroneous; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished -with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit
32.2
 
 Ener1,
Inc.
 1540
Broadway, Suite 25C
 New York,
New York 10036
  January
19, 2010
 
 Securities
and Exchange Commission
 100 F
Street, NE
 Washington,
DC 20549
 
 Re:
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Sec.
1350
 
 Dear
Ladies and Gentlemen:
 
 In
connection with the accompanying annual report on Form 10-K/A, Amendment No. 2,
of Ener1, Inc., for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Gerard Herlihy, Chief Financial Officer
of Ener1, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1)
              such
      annual report on Form 10-K/A, Amendment No. 2, of Ener1, Inc., for the
      year ended December 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
      78m or 78o(d)); and
 
 2)
              the
      information contained in such annual report on Form 10-K/A, Amendment No.
      2, of Ener1, Inc., for the year ended December 31, 2008, fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Ener1, Inc.
 
 /s/
      Gerard HerlihyGerard
      Herlihy
                    Chief
      Financial Officer
                    (Duly
      Authorized Principal Financial
                    and
      Principal Accounting Officer and Duly
                    Authorized
      Officer)
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Ener1, Inc. and will be
retained by Ener1, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
 
 This
certification is being “furnished” as Exhibit 32.2 to Ener1, Inc.’s annual
report and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to the
liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in
any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as
expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing.
###  

**Exhibit32.2**

**STATEMENTOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March31, 2007 (the “Form 10-Q”) of Cardinal Financial Corporation, I, Mark A.Wendel, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(a)           the Form 10-Q fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and

(b)           the information contained in the Form10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financialcondition and results of operations of the Company and its subsidiaries as of,and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.
| Date: May 9, 2007   |   | /s/ Mark A. Wendel                                   |
|-------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                     |   | Mark A. Wendel                                       |
|                     |   | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

** **

----
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 60 (Wednesday, March 29, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 16125]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7664]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. GT95-29-000]


East Tennessee Natural Gas Co.; Notice of Filing of Refund Report

March 23, 1995.
    On March 20, 1995, East Tennessee Natural Gas Company (East 
Tennessee), filed its report of refunds to flow through amounts 
received from its former upstream supplier, Tennessee Gas Pipeline 
Company (Tennessee).
    East Tennessee states that it received from Tennessee on February 
16, 1995, a refund of amounts paid during September and October 1993, 
under its former Tennessee Rate Schedules FT-A, LMS-MA, and FS. 
Tennessee effectuated the refund pursuant to the Commission's order 
dated November 15, 1994, in Docket Nos. RS92-23 and RP91-203 et al. 
accpeting Tennessee's July 15, 1994 compliance filing implementing 
settlement rates.
    On February 16, 1995, East Tennessee states that it disbursed the 
refunds, totaling $543,583, to its former jurisdictional sales 
customers.
    East Tennessee states that copies of the filing have been mailed to 
all affected customers and state regulatory commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to make any protest with 
reference to said filing should file a petition to intervene or protest 
with the Federal Energy Regualtory Commission, 825 North Capitol 
Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Sections 211 
and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 
385.211 and 385.214. All such petitions or protests should be filed on 
or before March 30, 1995. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to this proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a petition to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file and available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-7664 Filed 3-28-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.2

            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                         RULE 13a-14(b) OR 15d-14(b) AND
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of Jurak
Corporation World Wide, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for quarter ended
February 28, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
date hereof, I, Anthony C. Jurak, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act') and Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, that:

        (1)  the Company's Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements
             of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
             and

        (2)  the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
             in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Company.

Date: April 24, 2005                 /s/ Anthony C. Jurak
                                     -------------------------------
                                     Anthony C. Jurak
                                        Chief Financial Officer








         The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of
the Form 10-QSB or as separate disclosure documents. A signed original of this
written statement has been provided to Jurak Corporation World Wide, Inc. and
will be retained by Jurak Corporation World Wide, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3214

OSRAM Opto Semiconductors, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China. 

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel