alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Erna Jean TANNER, Appellant, v. TRANS CONTINENTAL LEASING CO., LTD., Respondent.

No. 65168.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Nov. 1, 1994.

Herbert D. Schaeffer, Clayton, for appellant.

Richard B. Blanke, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Erna Jean Tanner (“employee”), appeals from a decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission which found: employee’s sole employer was respondent, Trans Continental Leasing Co., Ltd. (“TCL”); employee was entitled to 403⁄41⁄8 weeks of temporary total disability; employee was not entitled to medical benefits after July 20, 1989; and employee suffered a 25% permanent, partial disability of the body as a whole referable to her head, headaches, loss of hearing in her left ear, tinnitus, left shoulder, left wrist, low back and right ankle. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the findings and conclusions of the Commission are not clearly erroneous. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the Commission’s order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum solely for the use the parties here involved has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 13, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4014

Duravant LLC and Ohlson Packaging:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
#### In the Matter of Robert Kaufman, Petitioner, v Anthony E. Shorris, Respondent.

In this CPLR article 78 proceeding, transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Irma Vidal Santaella, J.), entered September 13, 1989, the respondent’s determination, dated April 20, 1989, which assessed a real property transfer tax deficiency in the amount of $416,148 including interest, is unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding dismissed, without costs.

Petitioner transferred his 50% leasehold interest as a tenant in common of real property located at 77 Water Street to 77 Water Street Associates, a newly formed partnership, in exchange for a 50% interest in the partnership. The balance was held by 77 Water Street Inc., which purchased the other 50% leasehold interest in the property held by Louis Feil as tenant in common to avoid a liquidation of his interest in the property. At the closing, Feil was credited with $27,400,769.95 for the leasehold transaction, for which he received cash and two promissory notes. The amount of the deferred payment carried a 9% interest rate payable in addition to the principal amount. Upon petitioner’s and 77 Water Street Inc.’s transfer of their respective individual 50% interests in the leasehold to 77 Water Street Associates, the partnership became owner of 100% of the leasehold.

Nevertheless, petitioner proceeded to pay a real property transfer tax (RPTT) based solely upon the amount of his share of the preexisting and unpaid mortgage transferred to 77 Water Street Associates ($8,483,863.46) instead of the total consideration for the transfer based upon the purchase price *400of Feil’s interest ($27,400,769.95). Consequently, respondent issued a notice of deficiency based upon the higher figure.

Contrary to petitioner’s contention, the transfer of his interest as tenant in common in the subject property to a newly created partnership for the purpose of holding the property resulted in the receipt of consideration in the form of an interest in that partnership which is subject to the RPTT *(Matter of Levinsky v Kraut,*121 AD2d 723, 724). Moreover, the change of identity or form of ownership without a change in beneficial ownership does not entitle a party to an exclusion from the RPTT *(see, Matter of 123 W. 44th St. Assocs. v Grayson,*151 AD2d 1051, *Iv denied*75 NY2d 701; *Matter of 450 Seventh Ave. Corp. v City of New York,*116 AD2d 1042). Thus, respondent’s determination, which is rational and reasonable, will not be disturbed *(see, Kurcsics v Merchants Mut. Ins. Co.,*49 NY2d 451, 459). Finally, petitioner has failed to overcome his burden of disproving the correctness of the tax assessment *(see, Matter of Liberman v Gallman,*41 NY2d 774, 777). Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Kassal, Ellerin, Smith and Rubin, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of FedFirst Financial Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter
D. Griffith, the President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

       (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
             or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Company.



Date: May 13, 2005                      /s/ Peter D. Griffith
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        Peter D. Griffith
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4909

Protect Plus, LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_05.09.19.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-15-0000534

16-DEC-2016

08:15 AM
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5092 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5092

 To amend title XVII of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to specify that 
the Secretary of Energy may not make a loan guarantee under such title 
for a project if the applicable borrower has previously defaulted on an 
    obligation guaranteed under such title, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 28, 2023

 Mr. Walberg introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 
    Science, Space, and Technology, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XVII of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to specify that 
the Secretary of Energy may not make a loan guarantee under such title 
for a project if the applicable borrower has previously defaulted on an 
    obligation guaranteed under such title, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Energy Accountability Act''.

SEC. 2. DISQUALIFICATION OF BORROWERS WHO HAVE PREVIOUSLY DEFAULTED.

    Section 1702 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 16512) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(s) Disqualification for Previous Defaults.--The Secretary may 
not make a guarantee under this title for a project if the borrower or 
any related or successor entity, as determined by the Secretary, has 
previously defaulted on an obligation guaranteed under this title.''.
                                 <all>
```
Organization Name:

Note: Representatives submitting on behalf of an organization must enter information below.

Requestor Representative:

Section 301 Investigation: China's Acts, Policies, and Practices Related to Technology 

Transfer, Intellectual Property, and Innovation - Form to Request Exclusion of Product

When submitting a product exclusion request using this form, enter the specified 

information in the following fields and explain the basis and rationale for your statements. 

By completing this form, you certify that the information provided is complete and 

correct to the best of your knowledge. 

1. Indicate whether the comment contains business confidential information (BCI), is a public

document, or is a public version of a BCI document.

3.

2. Please provide a complete and detailed description of the product of concern:

4.

5. Requestor's relationship to the product:

CONTINUED BELOW

*

10-digit HTSUS item number* for product you wish to address in this product exclusion request:

Use numerical characters only with no special characters (example: 1023456789). For help in finding 

the HTSUS item number associated with your product, see https://hts.usitc.gov/

1

7.

6. Does this submission in regulations.gov include additional attachments?

Please indicate whether any additional attachment contains business confidential

information (BCI), is a public document, or is a public version of a BCI document.

VERSION 1

Requestor Information

Requestor Name (Last, First):

Public Version of BCI

RC506, 55.2 ton Capacity, 6.25 in Stroke, General Purpose Hydraulic Cylinder; Maximum Operating 

Pressure psi: 10000; Weight Kgs: 23,1; Oil Capacity Advance cm3: 1131; Stroke Ranges mm: 120 - 

174

8412210075 Schmidt, Jackie Enerpac Jackie SchmidtImporter Yes Contains BCI
END 2

8. Is this product, or a comparable product, available from sources in the United States?:

VERSION 1

11. Please provide information in support your request, taking account of the instructions

provided in Section B of the Federal Register notice (note: text entered below can extend

beyond the apparent size of this box).

9. Is this product, or a comparable product, available from sources in third countries?:

10. Please provide the value and quantity (with units) of the Chinese-origin product of concern

that you purchased for each calendar year specified. Limit this figure to the products

purchased by your firm (or by members of your trade association) alone. Please provide 

estimates if precise figures are unavailable.

2016 Value:

2015 Value:

2017 Value:

2016 Quantity:

2015 Quantity:

2017 Quantity:

No No BCI BCI BCI BCI BCI BCI

See addendum for additional information.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4979

Apergy ESP Systems, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4262

Tianhai Electric North America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3955

Enerpac:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
* Senior U.S. Circuit Judge David W. Dyer has elected to participate in further proceedings in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(c). United States Court of Appeal, Eleventh Circuit. No. 94-4878.Beth Ann FARAGHER; Nancy Ewanchew, Plaintiffs-Appellants-CrossAppellees,

v. CITY OF BOCA RATON, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, Bill Terry; David Silverman, Defendants-Appellees. May 13, 1996. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (No. 92-8010-CIV-SH); Shelby Highsmith, Judge.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING (Opinion February 8, 1996, 11th Cir., 1996, 76 F.3d 1155) Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, and KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges. *
BY THE COURT: A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that the above cau se shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 1, 2020

No. 04-20-00015-CR

Bronwen Victoria MCHENRY,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 18-0847-CR-A

Honorable Jessica Crawford, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The reporter’s record was originally due on February 3, 2020, but has not been filed in 

this court. The court reporter responsible for preparing the record, Lori Schmid, has not filed a 

notification of late record. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that court reporter Lori Schmid must 

file the reporter’s record within seven days from the date of this order.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 1st day of April, 2020.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz,

Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 61 (Thursday, March 30, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 16527]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7815]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration


Environmental Impact Statement: Oklahoma County, Oklahoma

AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FHWA is issuing this notice to advise the public that an 
Environment Impact Statement (EIS) will be prepared for the proposed 
highway project in Oklahoma County, Oklahoma.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bruce A. Lind, Acting Division 
Administrator, Federal Highway Administration, 200 Northwest Fifth 
Street, Room 454, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73102, Telephone: (405) 231-
4725.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FHWA, in cooperation with the Oklahoma 
Department of Transportation, will prepare an EIS in conjunction with a 
Major Investment Study (MIS) for a proposal to improve Interstate 40 in 
Oklahoma County. The proposed improvement would involve reconstructing 
Interstate 40 from the I-40/Meridian Avenue interchange east 9.6 
kilometers (6 miles) to the I-40/1235/1-35 interchange in Oklahoma 
City, Oklahoma County. Improvements to this segment of Interstate 40 
are considered necessary to provide for the projected traffic demand, 
to enhance safety and to replace structurally deficient bridge 
structures.
    The MIS/EIS will consider a number of alternatives including: 
taking no action, reconstruction on existing alignment and construction 
on new alignment and incorporate mass transit alternatives currently 
under study.
    The MIS/EIS process will solicit input from all appropriate 
Federal, State and local agencies. A public hearing will be held. 
Public notice will be given of the time and place of the hearing. The 
draft EIS will be available for public agency review and comment.
    To ensure that the full range of issues related to this proposed 
action are addressed and all significant issues identified, comments 
and suggestions are invited from all interested parties. Comments or 
questions concerning this proposed action and the EIS should be 
directed to the FHWA at the address provided above.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205, 
Highway Research, Planning and Construction. The regulations 
implementing Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental 
consultation on Federal programs and activities apply to this 
program.)

    Issued on: March 23, 1995.
Mike Herron,
Technology Operations Engineer, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
[FR Doc. 95-7815 Filed 3-29-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-M