alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BRIGHT HORIZONS FAMILY SOLUTIONS, INC. AT SEPTEMBER 30,
1999 AND FOR THE NINE MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                      13,203,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               19,113,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                (1,261,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            40,057,000
<PP&E>                                      54,500,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (12,169,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             100,820,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       30,126,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       122,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  61,538,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               100,820,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           180,560,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              154,957,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            16,241,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (567,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              9,929,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,069,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,860,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,860,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.46


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 497 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 497

  To eliminate the COVID-19 vaccine mandate on health care providers 
    furnishing items and services under certain Federal health care 
                               programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 25, 2023

 Mr. Duncan (for himself, Mrs. Rodgers of Washington, Mr. Massie, Mr. 
Dunn of Florida, Mr. Donalds, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Moolenaar, Mr. Wilson 
of South Carolina, Mr. Posey, Mr. Balderson, Mr. Johnson of Louisiana, 
Ms. Mace, Mr. Cloud, Mr. Austin Scott of Georgia, Mr. Carl, Mr. Ellzey, 
 Mr. Weber of Texas, Mrs. Greene of Georgia, Mr. Latta, Ms. Van Duyne, 
Mr. Timmons, Mr. Armstrong, Mr. Reschenthaler, Mr. Pfluger, Mr. Perry, 
 Mrs. Miller of Illinois, Mr. Crawford, Mr. Bilirakis, Mr. Hudson, Mr. 
    Guthrie, Mr. Rutherford, Mr. Jackson of Texas, Mr. LaMalfa, Mr. 
    Crenshaw, Ms. Stefanik, Mr. Bucshon, Mr. Allen, Mr. Biggs, Mrs. 
Boebert, Mr. Mast, Mr. Gosar, Mr. Norman, Ms. Malliotakis, Ms. Tenney, 
Mr. Bergman, Mr. Burgess, Mrs. Miller-Meeks, Mr. Guest, Mr. Palmer, Mr. 
    Sessions, Mr. Arrington, Mr. Fry, Mr. Ogles, Mr. McCormick, Mr. 
 Buchanan, Mr. Bishop of North Carolina, Mrs. Luna, Mrs. Harshbarger, 
Mr. Moore of Alabama, Mr. Miller of Ohio, and Mr. Ferguson) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
  Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a 
 period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To eliminate the COVID-19 vaccine mandate on health care providers 
    furnishing items and services under certain Federal health care 
                               programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Freedom for Health Care Workers 
Act''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATING THE COVID-19 VACCINE MANDATE ON HEALTH CARE 
              PROVIDERS FURNISHING ITEMS AND SERVICES UNDER CERTAIN 
              FEDERAL HEALTH CARE PROGRAMS.

    The Secretary of Health and Human Services may not implement, 
enforce, or otherwise give effect to the rule entitled ``Medicare and 
Medicaid Programs; Omnibus COVID-19 Health Care Staff Vaccination'' 
published by the Department of Health and Human Services on November 5, 
2021 (86 Fed. Reg. 61555) and may not promulgate any substantially 
similar rule.
                                 <all>
```
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

April 12, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4540

ECM Industries LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_04.15.19.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
clavis_s1a-ex1014.htm








Exhibit 10.14


 


 


 



	
Parties of the agreements

	
Jin Su Seo, Clavis Technologies


	
The agreement period

	
 2010.01.30~2011.01.29


(Extending 12 months without increasing deposit)


	
The deposit

	
\ 30,000,000 (separate VAT, Value-Added Tax)


	
The rental fee

	
\ 4,600,000/month (including management expenses)


	
Other payment

	
Electric charges


	
The size of rented space

	
247.61m2


	
Contents of the contract

	
- A lessee cannot rent out to other people some or all of the office instead of a landlord


- A lessee cannot assign to other people some or all of the office instead of a landlord


- Before the lease ends, a lessee has a right to negotiate with a landlord about extending the rental period and increasing rate of deposit.
#### Jeanette Lorraine CLARK, Respondent, v. Ronald Gene CLARK, Appellant.

Nos. 55434, 55511.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

July 25, 1989.

*348Patricia A. Riehl, Hillsboro, for appellant.

Paul Roger Ellis, Jackson, for respondent.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant/father appeals the trial court’s order modifying a dissolution decree pursuant to a motion by respondent/mother. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. An opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 26, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-5029

Goodman Manufacturing Company, L.P.:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 62 (Friday, March 31, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 16596]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7963]



========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 1995 / 
Notices
[[Page 16596]]

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service


Committee of Nine; Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act of October 6, 
1972, (Public Law 92-463, 86 Stat. 770-776), the Cooperative State 
Research, Education, and Extension Service announces the following 
meeting:

    Name: Committee of Nine.
    Date and Time: May 9, 1995, 1:00 p.m.--5:00 p.m.; May 10, 1995, 
8:30 a.m.--5:00 p.m.; May 11, 1995, 8:30 a.m.--Noon.
    Place: USDA, CSREES, 14th & Independence Avenue, S.W., Room 3854 
South Building, Washington, D.C. 20250.
    Type of Meeting: Open to the public. Persons may participate in 
the meeting as time and space permit.
    Comments: The public may file written comments before or after 
the meeting with the contact person listed below.
    Purpose: To evaluate and recommend proposals for cooperative 
research on problems that concern agriculture in two or more States, 
and to make recommendations for allocation of regional research 
funds appropriated by Congress under the Hatch Act for research at 
the State Agricultural Experiment Stations.
    Contact person for Agenda and more information: Dr. Walter R. 
Woods, Executive Secretary, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 
Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service, 14th & 
Independence Avenue, S.W., Room 3341, South Building, Washington, 
D.C. 20250, Telephone: 202-720-4088.

    Done at Washington, D.C., this 21st day of March 1995.
William D. Carlson,
Acting Administrator, Cooperative State Research, Education, and 
Extension Service.
[FR Doc. 95-7963 Filed 3-30-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-22-M
**Exhibit32.2**

**STATEMENTOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,2007 (the “Form 10-Q”) of Cardinal Financial Corporation, I, Mark A. Wendel,Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(a)           the Form 10-Q fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and

(b)           the information contained in the Form10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financialcondition and results of operations of the Company and its subsidiaries as of,and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.

 
| Date: August 9, 2007   |   | /s/ Mark A. Wendel                                    |
|----------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                        |   | Mark A. Wendel                                        |
|                        |   | Executive Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Shirl D. DRIVER, Defendant-Appellant. Shirl D. DRIVER, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent-Respondent.

Nos. 64575, 68076.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

Dec. 26, 1995.

Roger S. Lahr, Theresa Counts Burke, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Mary Moulton Bryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRAHAN, P.J., and CRANDALL and DOWD, JJ.

*114ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the judgment entered pursuant to the conviction by a jury of one count of possession of a controlled substance, § 195.202 RSMo 1986. The trial court sentenced Defendant as a persistent offender, § 558.016, RSMo 1986, to fifteen years’ imprisonment. Defendant also appeals the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of her Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of eiTor are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2297

Primex Family of Companies:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
Exhibit 3.1
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF THE CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF GREG MANNING AUCTIONS, INC.

Under Section 805 of the Business Corporation Law
of the State of New York

         Greg Manning Auctions, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under
the  laws  of  the  State of  New  York (the "Corporation"), hereby certifies as
follows:

FIRST: The name of the Corporation is Greg Manning Auctions,Inc. The Corporation
was formed under the name GM Auctions, Inc.

SECOND:  The certificate of  incorporation of the Corporation was filed with the
New  York   Department  of  State  on  August  14,  1981.  The   certificate  of
incorporation of the Corporation was restated on May 7, 1993.

THIRD:  The certificate of incorporation is hereby amended to increase the total
number of authorized shares of Common Stock from twenty million,  par value $.01
per share,  to forty million,  par value $.01 per share,  by replacing the first
paragraph of Article IV, in its entirety, with the following:

                  "The total  number of shares of all  classes of capital  stock
         that the  Corporation  shall have  authority to issue is Fifty  Million
         (50,000,000), consisting of:

                  (a)      Forty Million(40,000,000) shares of Common Stock with
                           a par value of $.01 per share (the "Common   Stock");
                           and

                  (b)      Ten Million  (10,000,000)  shares of Preferred  Stock
                           with a par  value of $.01 per share  (the  "Preferred
                           Stock")."

FOURTH:  The foregoing  amendment to the certificate of  incorporation  has been
duly adopted at a meeting of the board of directors  of the  Corporation  and by
the required vote of the shareholders of the Corporation at a special meeting of
shareholders.

         The  undersigned   officers  of  the   Corporation   have  signed  this
Certificate  of Amendment and each affirms that the  statements  made herein are
true under the penalties of perjury.

Dated:  February 23, 2000


                                      GREG MANNING AUCTIONS, INC.

                                        By:/s/ Greg Manning
                                             Greg Manning
                   Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President

                                        By:/s/ James A. Smith
                                           James A. Smith
                                          Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4360 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4360

   To amend title 37, United States Code, to extend the authority to 
  temporarily adjust the basic allowance for housing in certain areas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 June 8 (legislative day, June 7), 2022

 Mr. Ossoff (for himself and Mr. Rubio) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 37, United States Code, to extend the authority to 
  temporarily adjust the basic allowance for housing in certain areas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Military Housing Affordability Act 
of 2022''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress makes the following findings:
            (1) In April 2022, the median price for existing home sales 
        increased 14.8 percent from the previous year and 2021 saw 
        year-over-year median price increases as high as 23.6 percent, 
        according to data from the National Association of Realtors.
            (2) The Military Times, in July 2021, reported, ``A number 
        of service members [are] being forced to pay hundreds of 
        dollars more in rent per month than their housing allowance 
        covers.''.
            (3) In September 2021, the Department of Defense exercised 
        its authority to temporarily adjust basic allowance for housing 
        rates in 56 housing markets for members of the uniformed 
        services who incurred increased housing costs above their 
        current basic allowance for housing rate, in order to ``help 
        ease the financial burden of rising housing costs facing 
        Service members moving to new duty stations or signing new 
        leases''.
            (4) In November 2021, the Secretary of Defense approved a 
        temporary basic allowance for housing increase for members in 
        locations where rental prices rose at least 10 percent in 2021.
            (5) The Secretary of Defense's authority to temporarily 
        adjust basic allowance for housing rates in a military housing 
        area, if the actual costs of adequate housing for civilians in 
        that military housing area differs from the basic allowance for 
        housing rate by more than 20 percent, is set to expire on 
        September 30, 2022.

SEC. 3. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO TEMPORARILY ADJUST BASIC ALLOWANCE 
              FOR HOUSING IN CERTAIN AREAS.

    Section 403(b) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``2022'' both places it appears and inserting ``2024''.
                                 <all>
```
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5170

Radio Systems Corp:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_5-30-2019.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel