alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.8.2

                              VALUESTAR CORPORATION
                             1997 STOCK OPTION PLAN
                                 FIRST AMENDMENT

On March 31, 1998 the Board of Directors  authorized this first amendment of the
1997 Stock Option Plan which was originally adopted by the Board of Directors on
March 20, 1997 and  ratified by the  shareholders  on April 16,  1997.  The 1997
Stock Option Plan is hereby amended by deleting  Section 5 in its entirety to be
replaced by the following Section 5:


5. Shares Subject to the Plan.
For  purposes of the Plan,  the  Committee  is  authorized  to grant  Options to
purchase not more than five hundred  thousand  (500,000) shares of the Company's
common stock,  $.00025 par value per share ("Common Stock"),  either treasury or
authorized  but  unissued  shares,  or the number and kind of shares of stock or
other securities  which, in accordance with Section 13, shall be substituted for
such  shares of Common  Stock or to which such  shares  shall be  adjusted.  The
Committee is  authorized  to grant  Options  under the Plan with respect to such
shares.  Any or all  unsold  shares  subject  to an Option  which for any reason
expires or otherwise  terminates  (excluding  shares  returned to the Company in
payment of the exercise price for  additional  shares) may again be made subject
to grant under the Plan.

Consistent  with  Section 3.2 all options  granted  under this Plan in excess of
options on 200,000 common shares previously  ratified by the stockholders of the
Company,  are subject to, and may not be exercised before,  the approval of this
First Amendment by the holders of a majority of the Company's outstanding shares
on or  before  the  expiration  of  twelve  months  from the date of this  First
Amendment of this Plan by the Board,  and if such approval is not obtained,  all
Options previously granted in excess of options on 200,000 common shares,  shall
be void.

                                     * * * *

By signature below, the undersigned  officers of the Company hereby certify that
the  foregoing  is a true and correct  copy of the First  Amendment  to the 1997
Stock Option Plan of the Company.

DATED:  March 31, 1998

VALUESTAR CORPORATION



By       /s/ JAMES STEIN
         ------------------------------
         James Stein, President and CEO



By       /s/ BENJAMIN PITTMAN
         ------------------------------
         Benjamin Pittman, Secretary
----

----

| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |  By:  /s/ Kenneth Glynn                                                                           |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                Kenneth Glynn               |
|   |                President                   |
|   |                Chief Executive Officer and |
|   |                Chief Financial Officer     |
|   |                                                                                                             |
|   |                                                                                                             |
|   |  January 10, 2010                                                                                           |

----

----
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vystar Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, William R. Doyle, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Jack W. Callicutt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ William R. DoyleWilliam R. Doyle

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

May 16, 2011/s/ Jack W. CallicuttJack W. Callicutt

Chief Financial Officer

May 16, 2011





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Vystar Corporation and will be retained by Vystar Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Vystar Corporation, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
EXHIBIT 32.1

            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                         RULE 13a-14(b) OR 15d-14(b) AND
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of Jurak
Corporation World Wide, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for quarter ended
February 28, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
date hereof, I, Anthony C. Jurak, Chairman of the Board and Director and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify for the purpose of complying with Rule
13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
"Exchange Act') and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States
Code, that:

        (1)  the Company's Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements
             of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
             and

        (2)  the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
             in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Company.

Date: April 24, 2005     /s/ Anthony C. Jurak
                         -------------------------------
                         Anthony C. Jurak
                         Chairman of the Board and Director
                         Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 64 (Tuesday, April 4, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 17086]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8168]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Receipt of Application(s) for Permit

    The following applicant(s) has applied for a permit to conduct 
certain activities with endangered species. This notice is provided 
pursuant to Section 10(c) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as 
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531, et seq.)

PRT-798998

    Applicant: Mr. C. Lee Sherrod, Horizon Environmental Services Inc., 
Austin, Texas.
    The applicant requests a permit to take several threatened and 
endangered species that occur throughout the State of Texas, primarily 
in Travis and Bastrop Counties, for the purpose of scientific research 
and enhancement of propagation and survival of the species as 
prescribed by Service recovery documents.
    Addresses: Written data or comments should be submitted to the 
Assistant Regional Director, Ecological Services, U.S. Fish and 
Wildlife Service, P.O. Box 1306, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87103, and 
must be received by the Assistant Regional Director within 30 days for 
the date of this publication.
    Documents and other information submitted with this application are 
available for review, subject to the requirements of the Privacy Act 
and Freedom of Information Act, by any party who submits a written 
request for a copy of such documents to the above office within 30 days 
of the date of publication of this notice. (See Addresses above.)
John Cross,
Acting Regional Director, Region 2, Albuquerque, New Mexico.

[FR Doc. 95-8168 Filed 4-3-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-M
Exhibit 99.3    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Horizon Group Properties, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending
June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David R. Tinkham, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|Dated: August 12, 2002 |  | By: |  | /s/DAVID R. TINKHAMDavid R. Tinkham
Chief Financial Officer
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4250

Tianhai Electric North America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2989

C&K Components, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
#### In the Matter of Norman Goldman, Appellant, v Elaine E. Goldman, Respondent. (And Two Other Related Proceedings.)

Yesawich, Jr., J.

Appeal from an order and judgment of the Family Court of Schenectady County (Reilly, Jr., J.), entered January 11, 1989, which, *inter alia,*granted Elaine E. Goldman’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, to direct Norman Goldman to pay arrearages due pursuant to the terms of a separation agree*837ment incorporated but not merged into the parties’ judgment of divorce.

We adopt the reasoning underlying the decision and supplemental decision of Family Court Judge Vincent J. Reilly, Jr. Implicit in Family Court’s determination is a finding that Elaine E. Goldman did not waive her right to alimony arrears. We read the record, however, as warranting an explicit finding, and we so find, that she did not voluntarily and intentionally waive her right to alimony arrears accruing under the twelfth paragraph of the separation agreement.

Order and judgment affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Weiss, Yesawich, Jr., and Mercure, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE WORLD
HOUSE  ENTERTAINMENT,  INC. UNAUDITED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1999 AND THE
RELATED  STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                            1943
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  2393
<PP&E>                                           27154
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (11104)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   18443
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            35016
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           780
<OTHER-SE>                                     (17353)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     18443
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  3847
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    24073
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 713
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (18439)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (18439)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (18439)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4778

ECM Industries LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_5-30-2019.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
#### In the Interest of V.J.B., a minor. Helen BURKHOLDER, Natural Mother, Appellant, v. DIVISION OF FAMILY SERVICES, Tom Hoover, Juvenile Officer, Respondents.

No. WD 42316.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

July 24, 1990.

James J. Wheeler, Keytesville, for appellant.

John E. Casey, Brookfield, for respondents.

Before NUGENT, C.J., FENNER, J., and WASSERSTROM, Senior Judge.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Natural mother appeals from trial court’s order terminating her parental rights to her minor child.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5000 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5000

  To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
 provide funding for school resource officers, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 2023

 Mr. Gottheimer (for himself, Mr. Fitzpatrick, Mr. Kim of New Jersey, 
 Ms. Mace, Mr. Bacon, Mr. Davis of North Carolina, Mr. Moskowitz, Mr. 
 Johnson of Georgia, Ms. Garcia of Texas, Mr. Tony Gonzales of Texas, 
  Mr. Costa, and Mr. Thompson of California) introduced the following 
       bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
 provide funding for school resource officers, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Strengthening Our Schools Act of 
2023'' or the ``SOS Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. FUNDING FOR SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICERS.

    Section 1101(a)(11) of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets 
Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 10261(a)(11)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``$1,047,119,000 for 
        each of fiscal years 2006 through 2009'' and inserting 
        ``$1,097,119,000 for each of fiscal years 2024 through 2033''; 
        and
            (2) in subparagraph (B), by inserting after ``of the 
        purposes of part Q'' the following: ``, and not less than 
        $50,000,000 shall be allocated for grants pursuant to 
        applications submitted by units of local government or law 
        enforcement agencies for the purposes described in section 
        1701(b)(12)''.
                                 <all>
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas December 14, 2021 No. 04-21-00258-CR Aaron Dominique TRAYLOR ,

Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019-CR-6163 Honorable Melisa C. Skinner, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R Appellant’s brief was due on October 18, 2021. On November 17, 2021, the clerk of this court notified appellant’s attorney by letter that appellant’s brief was late and asked appellant’s attorney to respond to this court in writing. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 38.8(b)(2). Appellant’s attorney has not responded, and appellant’s brief has still not been filed. We ORDER appellant’s attorney to file appellant’s brief on or before January 3, 2022 . If appellant’s brief is not filed by that date, we will abate this appeal to the trial court for an abandonment hearing. T EX . R. A PP . P. 38.8(b)(2). Contempt proceedings may also be initiated against appellant’s attorney. Id . 38.8(b)(4).

_________________________________ Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 14th day of December, 2021.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
#### Kevin MURPHY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 70108.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Sept. 3, 1996.

Nancy L. Vincent, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jill C. LaHue, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kevin Murphy appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).