alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-2045

In re: ROBERT LIONEL SISK,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. 

(1:01-cr-00052-MR-14)

Submitted: November 20, 2012 Decided: November 26, 2012

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit 

Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Lionel Sisk, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert Lionel Sisk is serving the 276-month sentence 

imposed after he was found guilty of conspiracy to possess with 

intent to distribute cocaine and methamphetamine. Sisk 

petitions for a writ of mandamus, or other forms of 

extraordinary relief,* seeking an order vacating his sentence and 

remanding to the district court for resentencing in light of 

Johnson v. United States, 130 S. Ct. 1265 (2010), and Begay v. 

United States, 553 U.S. 137 (2008). We conclude that Sisk is 

not entitled to mandamus relief.

Mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used only in 

extraordinary circumstances, when “the petitioner has no other 

adequate means to obtain relief to which there is a clear and 

indisputable right.” In re Blackwater Sec. Consulting, L.L.C., 

460 F.3d 576, 592 (4th Cir. 2006) (internal quotations omitted); 

see also Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976). 

“Courts are extremely reluctant to grant a writ of mandamus.” 

In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 827 (4th Cir. 1987).

The relief sought by Sisk is not available by way of 

mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in 

 * Alternatively, Sisk asks us to grant him a writ of audita 

querela or coram nobis, to recall the mandate in his criminal 

case, or for leave to amend his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 

2012) motion. We conclude that Sisk is not entitled to any of 

these forms of relief. 
3

forma pauperis, we deny the petition for a writ of mandamus. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 59 (Tuesday, March 28, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15951-15952]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7565]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES INFORMATION AGENCY


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition; 
Determination

    Notice is hereby given of the following determination: Pursuant to 
the authority vested in me by the Act of [[Page 15952]] October 19, 
1965 (79 Stat. 985, 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978 (43 FR 13359, March 29, 1978), and Delegation Order No. 85-5 of 
June 27, 1985 (50 FR 27393, July 2, 1985), I hereby determine that the 
objects to be included in the exhibit, ``Mongolia: The Legacy of 
Chinggis Khan'' (See list\1\), imported from abroad for the temporary 
exhibition without profit within the United States, are of cultural 
significance. These objects are imported pursuant to a loan agreement 
with the foreign lenders. I also determine that the temporary 
exhibition or display of the listed exhibit objects at The Asian Art 
Museum, San Francisco, California from on or about July 19, 1995 
through October 15, 1995 and Denver Art Museum, Denver, Colorado from 
on or about November 11, 1995 through February 25, 1996 and National 
Geographic Society, Washington, DC. from on or about April 3, 1996 
through July 7, 1996 is in the national interest. Public Notice of this 
determination is ordered to be published in the Federal Register.

    \1\A copy of this list may be obtained by contacting Mr. Paul W. 
Manning, Assistant General Counsel, at 619-5997, and the address is 
Room 700, U.S. Information Agency, 301 Fourth Street, SW., 
Washington, DC. 20547.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Dated: March 22, 1995.
Les Jin,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 95-7565 Filed 3-27-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8230-01-M
Exhibit 4.26






Exhibit 4.26




Attachment One of Business Option Agreement — Power of Attorney




Power of Attorney




Xingye Zeng, the undersigned, hereby agrees to grant the authority in connection with its
owned shareholder’s right arising from the 2% of the equity interest of Ku6 (Beijing) Cultural
Media Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the Company) to WeiMoSanYi (Tianjin) Technology Co.,
Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the Proxy). The undersigned hereby irrevocably authorize the Proxy
to exercise the following rights in the effective term hereof:




The undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints the Proxy, with full power and authority, to act on
behalf of the undersigned as the shareholder of the Company holding 2% of the equity interest,
perform all the shareholder’s rights in accordance with the provisions of laws and articles of
association, including without limitation proposing for holding general meeting of stockholders,
accepting any notice relevant to hold general meeting of stockholders and standing orders,
participating the general meeting of stockholders and performing all the rights to vote as the
shareholder holding 2% of the equity interest (including as the authorized representative in the
general meeting of stockholders to appoint the Company’s directors, general managers, financial
controllers and other senior operating personnel, and to decide matters of distributing bonus),
selling or transferring the 2% of equity interest of the Company.




The Proxy is authorized to designate its appointed director in the board of directors (or executive
director) to exercise the authorized rights hereunder.




The undersigned hereby confirms that the undersigned is bound by any actions or nonfeasance
taken by the Proxy in the effective term hereof. The undersigned shall not raise objections to the
above actions, nonfeasance or decisions in any forms, and shall be liable for all the legal
responsibilities arising therefrom.




Unless the Business Operation Agreement executed by and among the Company, the Proxy, Shanyou
Li and the undersigned hereof is terminated in advance due to any reasons, the effective term
hereof shall remain effective for a term of twenty (20) years, commencing from execution date
hereof. Where the term expires and the Proxy requests, the undersigned shall extend the term hereof
without any conditions responding to the Proxy’s request.




Where it is necessary for the undersigned to sign any documents to perform, execute or perform the
above actions, nonfeasance or decisions due to any reasons, the undersigned will sign the relevant
documents in accordance with the Proxy’s instructions.




Proxy: Xingye Zeng

Signature:

Date: May 27th, 2010
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4165

Tianhai Electric North America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
----

----

| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |  By:  /s/ Kenneth Glynn                                                                     |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |               Kenneth Glynn               |
|   |               President                   |
|   |               Chief Executive Officer and |
|   |               Chief Financial Officer     |
|   |                                                                                                       |
|   |                                                                                                       |
|   |          October 1, 2010                                           |

----

----
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Diametrics Medical, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, David B. Kaysen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:  1.
    Except for the report of management on our internal control
over financial reporting and the related attestation report of the
Companys independent auditors, and the report and consent of
KPMG LLP with respect to the audited financial statements of the
Company for the two years ended December 31, 2003 (which reports
the Company intends to file by amendment to this Report), the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ David B. KaysenDavid B. KaysenChief Executive OfficerMay 5, 2005
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3



                        Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements 
of Pillowtex Corporation (Form S-8 Nos. 33-65408, 33-84624, 33-81478 and 
333-39191) of our report dated January 31, 1997, with respect to the 
consolidated financial statements of Fieldcrest Cannon, Inc. for the year 
ended December 31, 1996 included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for 
Pillowtex Corporation for the year ended January 3, 1998.


                                                 /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

                                                 Ernst & Young LLP


Greensboro, North Carolina
April 2, 1998
Consent letters of Netherland, Sewell International



 Exhibit 10.3 
 (1 of 2) 
  

			
	



	 	PRESIDENT - ROBERT C. BARG
	 	  
 VICE
PRESIDENTS
 ALLEN E. EVANS, JR.

RANDOLPH K. GREEN
 JOHN G. HATTNER
 C. H (SCOTT)
REES III
 DANNY S SIMMONS

DAN PAUL SMITH
 THOMAS M SOUERS


 June 27, 2011 
 Dr. Juan José Suárez Coppel 
 Director General 

Petróleos Mexicanos 
 Avenida Marina
Nacional No. 329 
 Colonia Petróleos Mexicanos C.P. 11311 
 Mexico 
 Dear Dr. Suárez Coppel: 

We hereby consent to all references to our firm as set forth in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Petróleos Mexicanos for the year ending
December 31, 2010 (the “Form 20-F”), under the heading “Exploration and Production (Reserves)”, and to the filing of our audit letter dated February 1, 2011, as an exhibit to the Form 20-F. We have audited the estimates
of proved oil, condensate, natural gas, and oil equivalent reserves owned by the United Mexican States (“Mexico”) as of December 31, 2010, for 28 fields located offshore Mexico in the Northeastern Marine Region. These estimates were
prepared by Pemex Exploración y Producción in accordance with the reserves definitions of Regulation S-X Rule 4-10(a) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. 

 

			
	 Sincerely,
  

NETHERLAND, SEWELL INTERNATIONAL, S. DE R.L. DE C.V.

		
	By:	 	/s/ Robert C. Barg
		 	 Robert C. Barg, P.E.

President



 1601 ELM STREET, SUITE 4500 •
DALLAS, TEXAS 75201-4754 • PH: 214-969-5401 • FAX: 214-969-5411 







 Exhibit 10.3 
 (2 of 2) 
  

			
	



	 	PRESIDENT - ROBERT C. BARG
	 	  
 VICE
PRESIDENTS
 ALLEN E. EVANS, JR.

RANDOLPH K. GREEN
 JOHN G. HATTNER
 C. H. (SCOTT)
REES III
 DANNY S SIMMONS

DAN PAUL SMITH
 THOMAS M. SOUERS


 June 27, 2011 
 Dr. Juan José Suárez Coppel 
 Director General 

Petróleos Mexicanos 
 Avenida Marina
Nacional No. 329 
 Colonia Petróleos Mexicanos C.P. 11311 
 México 
 Dear Dr. Suárez Coppel: 

We hereby consent to all references to our firm as set forth in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Petróleos Mexicanos for the year ending
December 31, 2010 (the “Form 20-F”), under the heading “Exploration and Production (Reserves)”, and to the filing of our audit letter dated February 1, 2011, as an exhibit to the Form 20-F. We have audited the estimates
of proved oil, condensate, natural gas, and oil equivalent reserves owned by the United Mexican States (“Mexico”) as of December 31, 2010, for 120 fields located onshore Mexico in the Southern Region. These estimates were prepared by
Pemex Exploración y Producción in accordance with the reserves definitions of Regulation S-X Rule 4-10(a) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. 

 

			
	 Sincerely,
  

NETHERLAND, SEWELL INTERNATIONAL, S. DE R.L. DE C.V.

		
	By:	 	/s/ Robert C. Barg
		 	 Robert C. Barg, P.E.

President



 1601 ELM STREET, SUITE 4500 •
DALLAS, TEXAS 75201-4754 • PH: 214-969-5401 • FAX: 214-969-5411
**Exhibit32.1**

**STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,2006 (the “Form 10-Q”) of Cardinal Financial Corporation, I, Bernard H.Clineburg, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, hereby certify pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that, to my knowledge:

(a)   theForm 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(b)   the informationcontained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, theconsolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company andits subsidiaries as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.
| Date: August 8, 2006 |   | /s/ Bernard H. Clineburg             |
|---------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------|
|                      |   | Bernard H. Clineburg                 |
|                      |   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           3,242
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,599
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         150,247
<DEPRECIATION>                                (10,935)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 151,152
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        105,055
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            29
<OTHER-SE>                                      32,689
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   151,152
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,709
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,362
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,711
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,160)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,160)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.41)




</TABLE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-5007

OMRON Management Center of America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3835

Academy, Ltd:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Organization Name:

Note: Representatives submitting on behalf of an organization must enter information below.

Requestor Representative:

Section 301 Investigation: China's Acts, Policies, and Practices Related to Technology 

Transfer, Intellectual Property, and Innovation - Form to Request Exclusion of Product

When submitting a product exclusion request using this form, enter the specified 

information in the following fields and explain the basis and rationale for your statements. 

By completing this form, you certify that the information provided is complete and 

correct to the best of your knowledge. 

1. Indicate whether the comment contains business confidential information (BCI), is a public

document, or is a public version of a BCI document.

3.

2. Please provide a complete and detailed description of the product of concern:

4.

5. Requestor's relationship to the product:

CONTINUED BELOW

*

10-digit HTSUS item number* for product you wish to address in this product exclusion request:

Use numerical characters only with no special characters (example: 1023456789). For help in finding 

the HTSUS item number associated with your product, see https://hts.usitc.gov/

1

7.

6. Does this submission in regulations.gov include additional attachments?

Please indicate whether any additional attachment contains business confidential

information (BCI), is a public document, or is a public version of a BCI document.

VERSION 1

Requestor Information

Requestor Name (Last, First):

Public Version of BCI

RC504, 55.2 ton Capacity, 4.00 in Stroke, General Purpose Hydraulic Cylinder; Maximum Operating 

Pressure psi: 10000; Weight Kgs: 19,1; Oil Capacity Advance cm3: 719; Stroke Ranges mm: 95 - 

119

8412210075 Schmidt, Jackie Enerpac Jackie SchmidtImporter Yes Contains BCI
END 2

8. Is this product, or a comparable product, available from sources in the United States?:

VERSION 1

11. Please provide information in support your request, taking account of the instructions

provided in Section B of the Federal Register notice (note: text entered below can extend

beyond the apparent size of this box).

9. Is this product, or a comparable product, available from sources in third countries?:

10. Please provide the value and quantity (with units) of the Chinese-origin product of concern

that you purchased for each calendar year specified. Limit this figure to the products

purchased by your firm (or by members of your trade association) alone. Please provide 

estimates if precise figures are unavailable.

2016 Value:

2015 Value:

2017 Value:

2016 Quantity:

2015 Quantity:

2017 Quantity:

No No BCI BCI BCI BCI BCI BCI

See addendum for additional information.