alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Charles BALLARD, Appellant. Charles BALLARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. WD 49436, WD 51515.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

May 21, 1996.

Rosalynn Koch, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Jefferson City, Philip M. Koppe, Assistant Attorney General, Kansas City, for respondent.

Before EDWIN H. SMITH, P.J., and BRECKENRIDGE and ELLIS, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Charles E. Ballard appeals his criminal conviction by a jury for the unlawful use of a weapon, § 571.030,1 and the subsequent denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Ballard was sentenced to a term of five years as a prior and persistent offender under § 558.016.

Judgment affirmed. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

1

. Unless otherwise noted, all statutory references are to RSMo 1994.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

April 12, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4113

Apex Sourcing & Manufacturing: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_04.15.19.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
exhibit10-2.htm




 


 


 


EXHIBIT 10.2







The form of Deferred Stock Unit Award Agreement (the “Agreement”), filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on From 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008, contains blanks where the executive’s name, target number of shares, grant date, vesting date, performance period, shortened performance period start date, and months in term provided under the Agreement vary for each executive.  The information for the executive officer who entered into the Agreement is provided in the following chart:













	
Executive Officer

	
Target number 


of shares

	
Grant date

	
Vesting date

	
Performance period

	
Shortened performance period start date

	
Months 


in term


	
Joseph J. MarcAurele

	
12,500

	
January 20 , 


2010

	
January 20, 


2013

	
January 1, 2010 


through December 31, 2012

	
January 1, 2010

	
36
CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO
                                18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                                AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                     SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Global Industries,
Ltd. ("Global") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"SEC") on March 21, 2003 (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS 1350 as adopted pursuant to
SS 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge based
upon a review of the Report, that:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Global as of the dates and for periods
presented as required by such Report.



/S/ WILLIAM J. DORE'
-----------------------
William J. Dore'
Chief Executive Officer
March 21, 2003


This certification is provided pursuant to SS 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent
required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by
Global or the certifying officer for purposes of SS 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.


A signed original of this written statement required by
SS 906 has been provided to Global Industries, Ltd. and will be
retained by it and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Kelvin GRIFFIN, Appellant. Kelvin GRIFFIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. 64537, 66016.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

May 30, 1995.

Deborah B. Wafer, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Cheryl A. Caponegro, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before SMITH, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and DOWD, JJ.

*MEMORANDUM OPINION*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from his conviction by a jury of assault first degree and armed criminal action and his sentence by the court as a prior, persistent, and class X offender to thirty years and ten years imprisonment respectively to be served consecutively. He also appeals from denial of his Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion. No error of law appears and the verdict of the jury is supported by the evidence. The judgment of the court on the Rule 29.15 motion is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential nor jurisprudential value.

Judgments affirmed. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                   SUBSIDIARIES OF SYNAGRO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

         The following is a list of all of the subsidiaries of the Company at
December 31, 1996.  Each of the subsidiaries is wholly-owned by the Company.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
       Corporate Name of Subsidiary           State of Incorporation  
-----------------------------------------   --------------------------
<S>                                                  <C>

CDR Environmental, Inc.                               Texas

Compost Technologies International, Inc.             Arkansas

Organi-Gro, Inc.                                     Arkansas

Pima Gro Systems, Inc.                               Arizona

ST Interco, Inc.                                     Delaware
</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 62 (Friday, March 31, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 16586]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7946]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 93-66; RM-8192]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Huntsville and Willis, Texas

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission, at the request of New Wavo Communications 
Group, Inc., reallocates Channel 279C3 from Huntsville to Willis, 
Texas, and modifies Station KVST(FM)'s license to specify Willis as its 
community of license. See 58 FR 17818, April 4, 1993. Channel 279C3 can 
be allocated in compliance with the Commission's minimum distance 
separation requirements with a site restriction of 5.3 kilometers (3.3 
miles) northwest to accommodate New Wavo's desired site. The 
coordinates for Channel 279C3 at Willis are 30-26-55 and 95-31-48.
    With this action, this proceeding is terminated.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 12, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pam Blumenthal, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 93-66, adopted March 17, 1995, and 
released March 28, 1995. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW, Washington, 
D.C. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractor, ITS, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 2100 M Street, 
NW, Suite 140, Washington, D.C. 20037.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: Secs. 303, 48 Stat., as amended, 1082; 47 U.S.C. 154, 
as amended.


Sec. 73.202  [AMENDED]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Texas, is 
amended by adding Willis, Channel 279C3 and removing Channel 279C3 at 
Huntsville.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 95-7946 Filed 3-30-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-1915

GreenTech Environmental, LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_05.09.19.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

April 12, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4478

ECM Industries LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_04.15.19.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4895

Arrowhead Electrical Products, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-5091

Goodman Manufacturing Company, L.P.: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXHIBIT 32(a)

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of OPENLiMiT, Inc. (Registrant) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), I, Henry Dattler, chief executive officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|(1) |  | This Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The information contained in this Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Registrant.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Henry Dattler

Henry Dattler

Chief Executive Officer

May 12, 2006

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-30465 Summary Calendar

GOLITH ADAMS, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus CHRISTIAN, Lieutenant; Mark Foster; KELLY WARD; RICHARD STALDER, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 97-CV-386

- - - - - - - - - - Janury 22, 1998 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Golith Adams, Jr., Louisiana prisoner # 100240, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his in forma pauperis (IFP) civil rights suit (under 42 U.S.C. § 1983) with prejudice as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). Adams contends that the conditions of his confinement in isolation constituted cruel and unusual punishment and imposed atypical and significant hardship on him. We have reviewed the record and Adams’ brief and AFFIRMNo. 97-30465 -2- the district court’s judgment for essentially the same reasons adopted by the district court. Adams v. Christian , No. 97-CV-386 (W.D. La. Mar. 20, 1997, and Apr. 15, 1997).
AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 48 (Monday, March 13, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 13514]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6298]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


Tennessee Valley Authority

[Meeting No. 1474]

TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m. (EST), March 15, 1995.

PLACE: TVA Knoxville Office Complex, 400 West Summit Hill Drive, 
Knoxville, Tennessee 37902.

STATUS: Open.

AGENDA: Approval of minutes of meeting held on February 15, 1995.

Action Items

New Business

C--Energy

    C1. Approval for Transmission/Power Supply Group to award a 
contract to ABB Power T & D Company for four 500-kV power 
transformers for the Lowndes, Mississippi, Substation.
    C2. Approval for Transmission/Power Supply Group to supplement 
Contract Nos. TV-89287V with Parsons Main, Inc.; TV-90216V with EGS 
Corporation; and TV-90208V with Mesa Associates, Inc., for support 
services to supplement TVA's in-house resources.
    C3. Approval for Purchasing to award a contract to Browning-
Ferris Industries of Tennessee, Inc., to implement and manage a 
comprehensive solid waste disposal and recycling services program.
    C4. Approval for Fossil and Hydro Power to award a contract to 
Roberts & Schaefer Company to provide engineering and design, 
materials and equipment, and field supervision of the installation 
and testing of a systemwide coal handling systems upgrade at TVA 
fossil plants.
    C5. Approval for TVA Nuclear to enter into a personal services 
contract with Tennessee Board of Regents to provide instructional 
services for TVA Nuclear's onsite degree programs, subject to 
satisfactory negotiations and final review prior to execution.
    C6. Approval for the Resource Group to supplement Contract No. 
TV-89601V with Fish and Wildlife Associates, Inc., to assist TVA in 
conducting biological research.

E--Real Property

    E1. Grant of permanent easement to James A. and Gina Gilbert for 
access to adjacent privately-owned property and grant of an easement 
for a house and yard affecting approximately 0.09 acre and 0.16 
acre, respectively, of Tract No. ACOR-2S of the Fabius properties in 
Jackson County, Alabama.

F--Unclassified

    F1. Filing of condemnation cases.

Information Items

    1. Grant of easement to the State of Tennessee affecting 21 
acres on Cherokee Lake in Grainger County, Tennessee.
    2. Revision of TVA's administrative cost recovery regulations.
    3. Expansion of the Testing and Restart Program.
    4. Amendment of the firm transmission service agreement between 
TVA and Entergy Power, Inc.
    5. Approval of a condemnation case.

FOR MORE INFORMATION: Please call TVA Public Relations at (615) 632-
6000, Knoxville, Tennessee. Information is also available at TVA's 
Washington Office (202) 898-2999.

    Dated: March 8, 1995.
Edward S. Christenbury,
General Counsel and Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-6298 Filed 3-9-95; 3:41 pm]
BILLING CODE 8120-08-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 13, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4774

Duravant LLC and FMH Conveyors Americas:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests and the 

request failed to show that this particular product is available only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn