alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Peter ANDERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 66332.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

May 23, 1995.

Douglas R. Hoff, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before GRIMM, C.J., REINHARD, P.J., and CRAHAN, J.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from an order denying his Rule 24.035 motion seeking to vacate the judgment entered on his plea of guilty to the charge of distributing a controlled substance near a school, § 195.214 RSMo.Supp.1989.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the judgment of the motion court is not clearly erroneous. Defendant’s sole point on appeal concerns a claim which was not presented to the motion court. Such a claim cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. *State v. Williams,*861 S.W.2d 670, 680 (Mo.App. 1993). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
----

----

| 1. | The      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the      period  ended December 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange      Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| February      19, 2008 | /s/      Zhenjiang      Yue                                |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                   | Zhenjiang      Yue, Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                                           |
|                   | and      Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                                      |

----
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4309

SPM Flow Control, Inc. DBA Weir SPM:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4236

Tianhai Electric North America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4964 

To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to require adjustments 

to the thrifty food plan to be budget-neutral, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 27, 2023 

Mr. BRECHEEN (for himself and Mr. BURLISON) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to require 

adjustments to the thrifty food plan to be budget-neutral, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Thrifty Food Plan Ac5 countability Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ADJUSTMENTS TO THE THRIFTY FOOD PLAN IN THE 

7 SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION ASSISTANCE 

8 PROGRAM. 

9 Section 3(u) of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 

10 (7 U.S.C. 2012(u)) is amended in the matter preceding 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4964 IH

1 paragraph (1) by inserting after the second sentence the 

2 following: ‘‘Each re-evaluation shall be budget-neutral and 

3 adjust the cost of the diet only in accordance with para4 graphs (1) through (4), as applicable.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3560

Scosche Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


              CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-97772) pertaining to the 1994 Incentive Stock Option and
Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan of InfoMed Holdings, Inc. of our report dated
February 23, 1998, with respect to the financial statements and schedule of
Simione Central Holdings, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended December 31, 1997.

                                                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Atlanta, Georgia
March 25, 1998
Exhibit 99.1





Independent Accountant's Report








Merrill Lynch Municipal ABS, Inc. (as Depositor)


c/o Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated


World Financial Center


North Tower, 9th Floor


250 Vesey Street


New York, New York 10080





Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (as Trustee)


60 Wall Street


New York, New York  10005





Re:           Prerefunded Municipal Certificates, Series 2 and Series 3 (the "Certificates")





Ladies and Gentlemen:





We have examined management's assertions that the Depositor and the Trustee have complied, in all material respects, with the provisions of the Trust Agreement of Prerefunded Municipal Certificates, Series 2 and Series 3 dated as of March 28, 1995 (the "Trust Agreement"), during the periods covered by the annual report on Form 10-K, filed by the Depositor on behalf of the Trust for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the "Annual Report").  Management is responsible for compliance with the Trust Agreement. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertions based on our examination.





Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Depositor's and the Trustee's compliance with the Trust Agreement and performing such other procedures as considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.





In our opinion, the Depositor and the Trustee have complied, in all material respects, with the Trust Agreement during the period covered by the Annual Report and management's assertions with respect to such compliance are fairly stated, in all material respects, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.








/s/ Aston Bell CPANew York, New YorkMarch 22, 2011
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

October 26, 2012

p1023

Order 

October 26, 2012

145105

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145105

COA: 302583 

Hillsdale CC: 10-342193-FH

RITA RENEE CRABTREE,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 20, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, in lieu of granting leave to appeal, 

we REVERSE that part of the Court of Appeals judgment addressing the assessment of 

points for offense variable (OV) 1, MCL 777.31, and OV 2, MCL 777.32, we VACATE 

the sentence of the Hillsdale Circuit Court, and we REMAND this case to the trial court 

for resentencing in light of the Court of Appeals decision in People v Ball, ___ Mich App 

___ (COA 303727, decided June 19, 2012), lv den ___ Mich ___ (SC 145668, October 

26, 2012). In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### Larry A. BROWN, Respondent, v. TRANS WORLD AIRLINES, Appellant.

No. WD 48903.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Aug. 23, 1994.

*268Thomas Clinkenbeard, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jerry Kenter, John Boyd, Kansas City, for respondent.

Before ELLIS, P.J., and BERREY and SMART, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from the final award of the Labor & Industrial Relations Commission in favor of respondent.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MA RCH 7, 2019

NO. 03

- 18

- 00775

- CR

Ex parte Raul Alvarez

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 9 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BA KER, AND TRIANA

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JU STICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the order denying the application for writ of habeas corpus sign ed by the

trial court. Having revi ewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there

was no reversible error in the order . Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s order denying

the application for writ of habeas corpus

. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs,

no adjudication of costs is made.
Exhibit 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Salisbury  Bancorp,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John F.
Perotti, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


    /s/ John F. Perotti
    -----------------------
    John F. Perotti
    Chief Executive Officer


August 9, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     The schedule contains summary financial information
     extracted from the consolidated financial statements of
     the Holt Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of and for the
     six months ended June 30, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety
     by reference to such consolidated financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           3,509
<SECURITIES>                                    37,873
<RECEIVABLES>                                   92,440
<ALLOWANCES>                                    32,735
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               111,397
<PP&E>                                         335,507
<DEPRECIATION>                                 110,424
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 414,315
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          408,809
<BONDS>                                         51,250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   414,315
<SALES>                                        158,313
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               163,497
<CGS>                                          160,975
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  169,014
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,428
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,339
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (22,284)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (22,284)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (22,284)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (222.84)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (222.84)



</TABLE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-1828

Jay Dee Obayashi JV:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 7 (Wednesday, January 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2799-2800]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-639]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Regulatory Guide; Issuance, Availability

    The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a revision to a guide 
in its Regulatory Guide Series. This series has been developed to 
describe and make available to the public such information as methods 
acceptable to the NRC staff for implementing specific parts of the 
Commission's regulations, techniques used by the staff in evaluating 
specific problems or postulated accidents, and data needed by the staff 
in its review of applications for permits and licenses.
    Revision 3 to Regulatory Guide 5.52, ``Standard Format and Content 
of a Licensee Physical Protection Plan for Strategic Special Nuclear 
Material at Fixed Sites (Other than Nuclear Power Plants),'' describes 
the format recommended by the NRC staff for preparing physical 
protection plans for formula quantities of strategic special nuclear 
material at fixed sites other than nuclear power plants. This Revision 
3 also provides guidance on the content of the physical protection 
plans.
    Comments and suggestions in connection with items for inclusion in 
guides currently being developed or improvements in all published 
guides are encouraged at any time. Written comments may be submitted to 
the Rules Review and Directives Branch, Division of Freedom of 
Information and Publications Services, Office of Administration, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555.
    Regulatory Guides are available for inspection at the Commission's 
Public Document Room, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC. Copies of 
issued guides may be purchased from the Government Printing Office at 
the current GPO price. Information on current GPO prices may be 
obtained by contacting the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government 
Printing Office, Post Office Box 37082, Washington, DC 20013-7082, 
telephone (202) 512-2249. Issued guides may also be purchased from the 
National Technical Information Service on a standing order basis. 
Details on this service may be obtained by writing NTIS, 5285 Port 
Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161.

(5 U.S.C. 552(a))

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 16th day of December 1994.


[[Page 2800]]


    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Eric S. Beckjord,
Director, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research.
[FR Doc. 95-639 Filed 1-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 58 (Monday, March 27, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 15673-15674]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7394]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

17 CFR Part 200

[Release No. 34-35483A]


Organization and Program Management; Correction

AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission.

ACTION: Correction to final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to the final rule which 
was published on Monday, March 20, 1995 (60 FR 14622). The rule updated 
the Commission's rules on organization and program management.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 27, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David M. Goldenberg, Office of Regulatory Policy, Division of 
Investment Management, (202) 942-4525.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    The Commission has undertaken a comprehensive review of the rules 
governing its organization and program management. The final rule that 
is the subject of this correction results from that review.

Need for Correction

    As published, the final rule describes in the section entitled 
``Supplementary Information'' certain amendments that, while approved 
by the Commission, [[Page 15674]] were inadvertently omitted from the 
Text of Amendments.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, the publication on March 20, 1995 of the final rule 
[Release No. 34-35483], which was the subject of FR Doc. 95-6696, is 
corrected as follows:


Sec. 200.30-5  [Amended]

    1. On Page 14628, in the third column, amendatory instruction 31a 
is added to read as follows: ``31a. Section 200.30-5 is amended by 
removing paragraph (f)(5) and redesignating paragraphs (f)(6), (f)(7), 
(f)(8) and (f)(9) as paragraphs (f)(5), (f)(6), (f)(7) and (f)(8).''

    Dated: March 21, 1995.
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
FR Doc. 95-7394 Filed 3-24-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M