# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 18

- 1409 V (not to be published)

MOHAMED MOHAMED

, Administrator

of the ESTATE OF SALAH HAMAD

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: July 17, 2020

Special Processing Unit (SPU);
Attorney’s Fees and Costs

R e nee Ja Gentry, The L a w O f fice of Renee J. Gentry , Washing ton, D.C. , for P etitioner.

Darryl R. Wishard , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for R espondent.

DECISION ON ATTORNEY ’ S FEES AND COSTS 1

On September 14, 2018

, petitioner, as administrator for the estate of his father,
Salah Hamad, filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq

. , 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner
alleges that his father suffered Guillain

- Barré Syndrome after receiving an influenza

vaccinati on on December 23, 2017, which resulted in his death on April 17, 2018

.

1 Because this unpublished D ecision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E

Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the D ecision will be available to anyone with access to the

internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 10 0 Stat. 3755

. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012 ).2 ( Petit ion at ¶¶ 2, 8 )

. On October 4, 2019

, a decision was issued awarding compensation

to P etitioner based on the Respondent ’ s proffer

. (ECF No. 27 )

.

Petitioner has now filed a motion for attorney’s fees and costs, dated June 1, 2020

, (ECF No. 37 ) , requesting a total award of $ 45,060 .97 (representing $ 36,696.90 in fees
and $ 8,364 .07 in costs). In accordance with General Order #9 , counsel for Petitioner
represent Petitioner incurred no out

- of

- pocket expenses. ( Id. at 1 )

. Respondent reacted

to the motion on June 2, 2020 indicating that he is satisfied that the statutory requirements for an award of attorney’s fees and costs are met in this case and defers to the Court’s discretion to determine the amount to be awarded. Petitioner did not file a reply thereafte r.

I have reviewed the billing records submitted with P etitioner’s request. In my experience, the request appears reasonable, and I find no cause to reduce the requested

hours or rates.

The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorney ’ s fees and costs

. § 15(e). Accordingly, I hereby GRANT Petitioner’s Motion for attorney ’ s fees and costs. I

award a total of $ 45,060.97 (representing $ 36,696 .90 in attorney’s fees and $ 8,364.07 in costs) as a lump sum in the form of a check jointly payable to Petitioner and Petitioner’s

counsel

. In the absence of a timely

- filed motion for review (see Appendix B to the Rules of the Court), the Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this dec ision. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11( a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by filing a joint notice renouncing their right to seek review.