alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk November 20, 2012

t1113 

# Order

November 20, 2012

145545

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145545

COA: 302821

Saginaw CC: 06

- 027797

- FC

JEFFREY MONTREAL CURRY,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 31, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 60 (Wednesday, March 29, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 16161]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7674]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Pea Ridge National Military Park Advisory Team; Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act that a meeting of the Pea Ridge National Military Park 
Advisory Team will be held at 6:00 p.m., on Thursday, April 20, 1995, 
in the park visitor center auditorium, 15930 Highway 62, Garfield, 
Arkansas.
    The Pea Ridge National Military Park Advisory Team was established 
under authority of section 3 of Public Law 91-383 (16 U.S.C. 1a-2(c)) 
to provide a forum for dialogue between community representatives and 
the Pea Ridge National Military Park on management issues affecting the 
park and the community.
    The matter to be discussed at this meeting includes: Boundary 
Study.
    The meeting will be open to the public. However, facilities and 
space for accommodating members of the public are limited, and persons 
will be accommodated on a first-come-first-served basis. Any member of 
the public may file a written statement concerning the matters to be 
discussed with the Superintendent, Pea Ridge National Military Park.
    Persons wishing further information concerning this meeting, or who 
wish to submit written statements may contact Steve Adams, 
Superintendent, Pea Ridge National Military Park, P.O. Box 700, Pea 
Ridge, AR 72751-0700, Telephone 501/451-8122.
    Minutes of the meeting will be available for public inspection four 
weeks after the meeting at the office of Pea Ridge National Military 
Park.

    Dated: March 20, 1995.
Ernest W. Ortega,
Regional Director, Southwest Region.
[FR Doc. 95-7674 Filed 3-28-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Patrick J. Dirk, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed thisreport on Form 10-Q of TROY Group, Inc.;

 

2.             Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)           designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)           evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)           disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.             The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a)           all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b)           any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date:  July 15, 2004 | /s/Patrick J. Dirk                    |   |
|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                           | Patrick J. Dirk                       |
|                           | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3859

Yaesu USA Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 62 (Friday, March 31, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 16680]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7877]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Advisory Panel for Neuroscience; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: Advisory Panel for Neuroscience (1158.)
    Date and Time: April 20-21, 1995, 9:00 am. to 5:00 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, Rm 310, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: Part-Open.
    Contact Person: Dr. James Koening, Program Director, 
Neuroendocrinology; Division of Integrative Biology and 
Neuroscience, Room 685, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230; Telephone: (703) 306-1423.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Minutes: May be obtained from the contact person listed above.
    Agenda: Open Session: April 21, 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m., To 
discuss research trends and opportunities in Neuroendocrinology. 
Closed Session: April 20, 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.; April 21, 1995, 
9:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m., 12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.; To 
Neuroendocrinology proposals as part of the selection process for 
awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: March 27, 1995.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-7877 Filed 3-30-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Brian FINNEY, Appellant. Brian FINNEY, Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. 66099, 67938.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

Jan. 23, 1996.

Robert E. Steele, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Christine M. Blegen, Asst. Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before SMITH, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and RHODES RUSSELL, JJ.

*MEMORANDUM DECISION*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from judgments of conviction of first degree robbery, first degree burglary, felonious restraint, and three counts of armed criminal action. He was sentenced as a prior, persistent and Class X offender to five concurrent twenty-five year terms of imprisonment and one concurrent twenty year term. He also appeals denial of his post-conviction Rule 29.15 motion following evidentiary hearing. No error of law appears, the verdicts are supported by the evidence, the order denying the Rule 29.15 motion is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous, and no precedential value would be served by an opinion.

Judgments of conviction and order denying Rule 29.15 motion are affirmed. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         13,925
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  12,923
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,537)
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               41,981
<PP&E>                                         16,440
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (8,766)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 50,118
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          18,668
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       285
<OTHER-SE>                                     28,926
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   50,118
<SALES>                                        21,387
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               35,097
<CGS>                                          12,645
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  42,044
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             28
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (18,637)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (18,637)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (18,637)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.67)



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 21.1

                 Subsidiaries of the Registrant

                    (Global Industries, Ltd.)

          NAME                   INCORPORATION

Global Divers and Contractors, L.L.C.		Louisiana
Global Pipelines PLUS, L.L.C.                   Louisiana
Pipelines,  L.L.C.                              Louisiana
Global Movible Offshore, L.L.C.			Louisiana
Pelican Transportation, L.L.C.			Louisiana
The Red Adair Co., L.L.C.                       Louisiana
Global Industries Offshore, L.L.C.              Louisiana
Global Offshore International, LTD              Cayman Islands
Global International Vessels, Ltd.              Cayman Islands
Norman Offshore Pipelines, L.L.C.               Louisiana
Global Pipelines Plus (Nigeria), Ltd.		Nigeria
Global Offshore, Pty. Ltd.                      Australia
Global Industries Asia Pacific Pte, Ltd.	Singapore
Global Industries (B)Sdn. Bhd.			Brunei
PT Global Industries Asia Pacific               Indonesia
Global Asia Pacific Industries, Sdn. Bhd.	Malaysia
Subtec Marine Services Limited			Cyprus
Subtec Offshore Support, Ltd.                   Cyprus
Subtec National Company, L.L.C.			United Arab Emirates
GIL Holdings, L.L.C.                            Louisiana
Global Production Services, L.L.C.              Louisiana
Global Industries Mexico Holdings, S.
  de R.L. de C.V.                               Mexico
Global Vessels Mexico, S. de R.L.de C.V.	Mexico
Global Industries Offshore Services, S.
  de R.L. de C.V.                               Mexico
Global Industries Services, S. de R.L.
  de C.V.                                       Mexico
Global Offshore Mexico,S. de R.L. de C.V.	Mexico
Global Offshore (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.		Malaysia
Global Industries Offshore(Thailand), Ltd.	Thailand
Global Offshore International, L.L.C.		Louisiana
Sunset Contracting Services, Inc.               Texas
Global Industries International, L.P.		Cayman Islands
Global Industries Offshore Spain, S.L.		Spain
Global Industries Offshore Netherlands, BV	The Netherlands
Global Industries Offshore Labuan Ltd.		Labuan
Global Vessels Mauritius, Ltd.                  Mauritius
Global Construction Mauritius Services, Ltd.	Mauritius
GIL Mauritius Holdings, Ltd.                    Mauritius
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3253

CW Bearing USA, Inc:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4991 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4991

To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to commence a rule making 
to establish a U.S. Customs and Border Protection international port of 
         entry at the Port of Stockton and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 2023

  Mr. Duarte introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
   Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on 
 Homeland Security, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to commence a rule making 
to establish a U.S. Customs and Border Protection international port of 
         entry at the Port of Stockton and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RULE MAKING TO ESTABLISH A U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER 
              PROTECTION INTERNATIONAL PORT OF ENTRY AT THE PORT OF 
              STOCKTON.

    The Secretary of Homeland Security shall commence a rule making to 
establish a U.S. Customs and Border Protection international port of 
entry at the Port of Stockton in the State of California.
                                 <all>
```
|   | Exhibit 32.1 |
|--------|--------------|

RULE 13(a)-14(b) CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Brandywine Operating Partnership, L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gerard H. Sweeney, President and Chief Executive Officer of Brandywine Realty Trust, the Partnership’s sole general partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                                                                                                    |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2.     | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership. |

|                         |   |                                  |
|-------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
| Date: November 14, 2005 |   | /s/ Gerard H. Sweeney                 |
|                    |   |                                  |
|                    |   | Gerard H. Sweeney                     |
|                    |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

*  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Brandywine Realty Trust and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 21

      SUBSIDIARIES OF CAMBRIDGE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS (MASSACHUSETTS), INC.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

     Name of Subsidiary                               Jurisdiction of Incorporation

<S>                                                     <C>
Cambridge Technology Partners International, Inc.           Delaware
Cambridge Technology Partners (Latin America), Inc.         Delaware
Cambridge Technology Partners (Mexico), S.A. de C.V.        Mexico
CTP Services, S.A. de C.V.                                  Mexico
Cambridge Technology Partners (Venezuela) C.A.              Venezuela
Cambridge Technology Partners de Brazil S/C LTDA            Brazil
Cambridge Technology Partners Ltd.                          Ontario
Cambridge Technology Partners (Switzerland) S.A.            Switzerland
Cambridge Technology Partners (Asia), Inc.                  Delaware
Cambridge Technology Partners Pty. Ltd.                     Australia
Cambridge Technology Partners India Private Limited         India
Cambridge Technology Partners Limited                       Japan
Cambridge Technology Partners (Europe), Inc.                Delaware
Cambridge Technology Partners (Netherlands), B.V.           Netherlands
Cambridge Technology Partners (UK), Ltd.                    United Kingdom
Cambridge Technology Partners Ireland Ltd.                  Ireland
Peter Chadwick Holdings Limited                             United Kingdom
Cambridge Technology Partners (Benelux) B.V.                Netherlands
Cambridge PCHL L.L.C.                                       Delaware
Cambridge Technology Partners Cambridge Management
 Consulting, Inc.                                           California
Cambridge Technology Partners-Enterprise Resources
 Solutions, Inc.                                            California
Cambridge Technology Partners Securities Corporation        Massachusetts

</TABLE>