alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### A. Norrie WAKE, Movant, v. KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION, Respondent.

No. 93-SC-612-KB.

Supreme Court of Kentucky.

Sept. 2, 1993.

As Corrected Sept. 3, 1993.

A. Norrie Wake, pro se.

Bruce K. Davis, Executive Director, Barbara S. Rhea, Kentucky Bar Ass’n, Frankfort, for respondent.

*OPINION AND ORDER*

A. Norrie Wake of Lexington was found guilty of mail fraud, a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341; misappropriation of funds in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 666 and conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. The charges arise from a scheme where employees of the Fayette County Attorney’s office were given excessive pay raises and these funds were then channeled back to pay Wake’s accumulated campaign debt in his campaign for Fay-ette County Attorney. Such criminal conduct as established by the convictions violates SCR 3.130(8.3).

Wake now seeks to resign his license to practice law under terms of disbarment. His convictions are of such a nature as to put in grave issue his moral fitness to continue the practice of law. *KBA v. Cline,*Ky., 814 S.W.2d 925 (1991). The Kentucky Bar Association has indicated that the motion to resign his license is acceptable.

Therefore, it is ordered that A. Norrie Wake’s motion to resign from the practice of law in the Commonwealth of Kentucky and the Kentucky Bar Association is granted. It is further ordered that:

1. Wake shall not be permitted to engage in the practice of law in the Commonwealth of Kentucky until such time as the Supreme Court of Kentucky enters an order reinstating his membership in the Kentucky Bar Association.

2. Wake shall not file an application for reinstatement for a period of five years from September 2, 1993.

3. Any application for reinstatement shall be governed by SCR 3.520, or any subse*296quent amendment thereto regarding reinstatement in case of disbarment.

4. All disciplinary proceedings against Wake shall be terminated and the costs thereof shall be paid by Wake in accordance with SCR 3.450(1) and SCR 3.480(3) in the sum of $7.70.

5. Pursuant to SCR 3.390, Wake is hereby ordered to provide notice to any clients he is currently representing of his inability to provide further legal services, to notify all courts in which he has matters pending of his resignation under terms of disbarment, and to provide the Director of the Kentucky Bar Association with a copy of all such letters.

All concur, except STEPHENS, C.J., not sitting.

ENTERED September 2, 1993.

/s/ Charles M. Leibson Acting Chief Justice
Exhibit 99.1




                          FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE


            January 27, 1997 -- Chic by H.I.S, Inc. (New York Stock Exchange
symbol: JNS) announced today that it has retained a managing underwriter for a
proposed initial public offering that will result in the sale by Chic of a
significant minority interest in Chic's wholly-owned German subsidiary h.i.s.
sportswear GmbH headquartered in Munich. The sale is expected to occur in the
second quarter of 1997. Consummation of the sale would be subject to market
conditions, approval by Chic's Board of Directors, receipt of a fairness opinion
from Chic's financial adviser, execution of an underwriting agreement and other
definitive documentation and satisfaction of certain legal and regulatory
requirements.
            Upon consummation of the proposed transaction it is anticipated that
the German subsidiary's common stock will be listed on the Frankfurt and Munich
stock exchanges. The securities to be sold in the proposed transaction will not
be registered under the Securities Act of 1933 and may not be offered or sold in
the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from
registration requirements.
            The German subsidiary markets women's and men's jeans and casual
pants under the H.I.S. brand name primarily in Germany and, to a lesser extent,
Austria, Switzerland, the Czech Republic, Poland and the Netherlands.
            Chic stated that it is considering a variety of uses for the
proceeds to be received by it from the proposed sale, but that ultimately the
use of proceeds will depend on the timing of the sale, the amount of proceeds
actually realized and other factors.




<PAGE>


                                                                               2



            Chic designs, manufactures and markets moderately priced, basic
style, cotton denim jeans, casual pants and shorts for women, girls, men and
boys.
            FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:  Contact:  Chic Public Relations
Department (212-302-6400).

                            *       *       *
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 13, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-41520

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MARTIN ALVAREZ-GAMEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:05-CR-370-ALL 

--------------------

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Martin AlvarezGamez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres

v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a

prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The

Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4205

MAHLE Behr USA, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4877

Horizon Hobby LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_05.09.19.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Metretek Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, W.
Phillip Marcum, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


Date: March 22, 2005                    /s/ W. Phillip Marcum
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        W. Phillip Marcum
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with Spectrum Group International, Inc.'s (the “Company”) annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








Date:  September 23, 2010/s/ Gregory N. RobertsName:  Gregory N. RobertsTitle:    President & Chief Executive Officer





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4325

SPM Flow Control, Inc. DBA Weir SPM:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4672

II-VI Incorporated:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

“Made in China 2025” or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

April 12, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-1656

EQI, Ltd: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_04.15.19.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
<PAGE>

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Post-Effective Amendment
No. 10/Amendment No. 241 to Registration Statement Nos. 333-137969/811-08306 on
Form N-4 of our report dated March 31, 2011, relating to the financial
statements and financial highlights comprising each of the Sub-Accounts of
First MetLife Investors Variable Annuity Account One, and our report dated
April 12, 2011, relating to the financial statements of First MetLife Investors
Insurance Company, both appearing in the Statement of Additional Information in
Post-Effective Amendment No. 8/Amendment No. 233 to Registration Statement Nos.
333-137969/811-08306 of First MetLife Investors Variable Annuity Account One,
and to the reference to us under the heading "Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm" in the Statement of Additional Information, also in such
Registration Statement.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Tampa, Florida
July 1, 2011
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 57 (Friday, March 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15559-15560]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7252]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-132-001]


Williams Natural Gas Co., Notice of Refund Report

March 20, 1995.
    Take notice that on March 14, 1995, Williams Natural Gas Company 
(WNG) tendered for filing a report of refunds made to Shippers.
    WNG states that on January 20, 1995, it filed a report of net 
revenue received from cash-outs for the twelve-month period October 
1993 through September 1994. The report proposed to make such refunds 
to Shippers listed on the refund report, including interest from 
January 14, 1995 through the date of the refund, upon Commission 
approval of the report of refunds. By order dated February 27, the 
Commission accepted WNG's filing and required WNG to make refunds to 
its customers as proposed. The attached refund report is being filed in 
compliance with the order.
    WNG states that a copy of this filing was served on all Shippers 
receiving a refund, all participants listed on the service lists 
maintained by the Commission in the docket referenced above, and 
interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to protect said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol 
Street, N.E., [[Page 15560]] Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with 
Section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such 
protests should be filed on or before March 27, 1995. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-7252 Filed 3-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Organization Name:

Note: Representatives submitting on behalf of an organization must enter information below.

Requestor Representative:

Section 301 Investigation: China's Acts, Policies, and Practices Related to Technology 

Transfer, Intellectual Property, and Innovation - Form to Request Exclusion of Product

When submitting a product exclusion request using this form, enter the specified 

information in the following fields and explain the basis and rationale for your statements. 

By completing this form, you certify that the information provided is complete and 

correct to the best of your knowledge. 

1. Indicate whether the comment contains business confidential information (BCI), is a public

document, or is a public version of a BCI document.

3.

2. Please provide a complete and detailed description of the product of concern:

4.

5. Requestor's relationship to the product:

CONTINUED BELOW

*

10-digit HTSUS item number* for product you wish to address in this product exclusion request:

Use numerical characters only with no special characters (example: 1023456789). For help in finding 

the HTSUS item number associated with your product, see https://hts.usitc.gov/

1

7.

6. Does this submission in regulations.gov include additional attachments?

Please indicate whether any additional attachment contains business confidential

information (BCI), is a public document, or is a public version of a BCI document.

VERSION 1

Requestor Information

Requestor Name (Last, First):

Public Version of BCI

RSM100, 11.2 ton Capacity, .44 in Stroke, Low Height Hydraulic Cylinder; Maximum Operating 

Pressure psi: 10000; Weight Kgs: 1,4; Oil Capacity Advance cm3: 18; Stroke Ranges mm: 0 - 23

8412210075 Schmidt, Jackie Enerpac Jackie SchmidtImporter Yes Contains BCI
END 2

8. Is this product, or a comparable product, available from sources in the United States?:

VERSION 1

11. Please provide information in support your request, taking account of the instructions

provided in Section B of the Federal Register notice (note: text entered below can extend

beyond the apparent size of this box).

9. Is this product, or a comparable product, available from sources in third countries?:

10. Please provide the value and quantity (with units) of the Chinese-origin product of concern

that you purchased for each calendar year specified. Limit this figure to the products

purchased by your firm (or by members of your trade association) alone. Please provide 

estimates if precise figures are unavailable.

2016 Value:

2015 Value:

2017 Value:

2016 Quantity:

2015 Quantity:

2017 Quantity:

No No BCI BCI BCI BCI BCI BCI

See addendum for additional information.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2522

Reelcraft Industries:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn