alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                     906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Murray Wilson, President and Chief Financial Officer of Ciro International,
Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)   the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended
March 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C.
78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: June 11,  2003

/s/ Murray Wilson
-----------------
Murray Wilson
President and Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 38 (Monday, February 27, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10587-10588]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4709]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

FBD Holding Company, et al.; Formations of; Acquisitions by; and 
Mergers of Bank Holding Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied for the Board's 
approval under section 3 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 
1842) and Sec.  225.14 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.14) to 
become a bank holding company or to acquire a bank or bank holding 
company. The factors that are considered in acting on the applications 
are set forth in section 3(c) of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Each application is available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. Once the [[Page 10588]] application has 
been accepted for processing, it will also be available for inspection 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may 
express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank or to the offices of 
the Board of Governors. Any comment on an application that requests a 
hearing must include a statement of why a written presentation would 
not suffice in lieu of a hearing, identifying specifically any 
questions of fact that are in dispute and summarizing the evidence that 
would be presented at a hearing.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received not later than March 23, 1995.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Zane R. Kelley, Vice President) 
104 Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303:
    1. FBD Holding Company, Dalton, Georgia; to become a bank holding 
company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of First Bank of 
Dalton (in organization), Dalton, Georgia.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (John E. Yorke, Senior Vice 
President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64198:
    1. Commerce Bancshares, Inc., and its wholly owned subsidiary, CBI-
Illinois, both of Kansas City, Missouri; to acquire 100 percent of the 
voting shares of Chillicothe State Bancorp, Inc., Chillicothe, 
Illinois, and thereby indirectly acquire Chillicothe State Bank, 
Chillicothe, Illinois.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 21, 
1995.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-4709 Filed 2-24-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Inconnection with the quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof Hard Rock Hotel, Inc. (the “Company”) for the nine month period endedSeptember 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), Peter A. Morton, as Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, and James D. Bowen, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company,each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuantto § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of hisknowledge:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/  Peter A. Morton            |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|
| Name:  Peter A. Morton          |   |
| Title:  Chief Executive Officer |   |
| Date:  November 14, 2005   |   |
|                            |   |
| /s/  James D. Bowen             |   |
| Name:  James D. Bowen           |   |
| Title:  Chief Financial Officer |   |
| Date:  November 14, 2005   |   |

 

Thiscertification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

21

----
<PAGE>   1


                        MAHONING NATIONAL BANCORP, INC.
                                   FORM 10-K


                                 EXHIBIT 99(a)


                    Report of Independent Certified Public
                    Accountants.  Predecessor Auditors Report for
                    the two years ended December 31, 1995.






                                Page 65 of 81
<PAGE>   2


                                             700 One Prudential Plaza
                                             130 E. Randolph Drive
                                             Chicago, IL 60601-6203
                                             312 856-0200



               REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
               --------------------------------------------------

             
                             Grant Thornton [LOGO]
                             GRANT THORNTON LLP Accountants and
                                                Management Consultants

                                                The U.S. Member Firm of
                                                Grant Thornton International  




Board of Directors and Stockholders
Mahoning National Bancorp, Inc.

         We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial
condition of Mahoning National Bancorp, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary,
The Mahoning National Bank of Youngstown as of December 31, 1995 and the related
consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity and cash
flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 1995. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.

         We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

         In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of
Mahoning National Bancorp, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, The Mahoning
National Bank of Youngstown as of December 31, 1995 and the consolidated results
of their operations and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended
December 31, 1995, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.


                                                  /s/ Grant Thornton LLP

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
January 19, 1996





                                Page 66 of 81
Independent Auditors' Consent

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 No. 333-60114 relating to the 2000 Stock Option and Incentive Plan of
Shoe Carnival, Inc., and the Registration  Statements on Form S-8(Nos. 33-74050
and 333-44047) relating to the 1993 Stock Option and Incentive Plan of Shoe
Carnival, Inc., and the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-80979)
relating to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Shoe Carnival, Inc., and the
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-82819) relating to the Outside
Directors Stock Option Plan of Shoe Carnival, Inc. of our report dated
March 2, 2001, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Shoe Carnival,
Inc. for the year ended February 3, 2001.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
San Francisco, California
May 4, 2001
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kevin Johnson, Also Known as Elmon Sabb, Appellant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Rettinger, J.), rendered December 15, 1987, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the second degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree *268and sentencing him, as a predicate felon, to concurrent indeterminate prison terms of from 4 to 8 years and 1 Vi to 3 years on the burglary and criminal possession charges, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant entered a music shop located on the ground floor and second floor of a five-story residential brownstone situated on West 69th Street in Manhattan. The owners of the music shop, the complainant and her husband, resided on the third and fourth floors, and they leased the top floor as a residence to a tenant. The shop and residential units above were separate units.

Defendant gained access to the music shop through its front door located on the ground floor. The front door had been left open by a worker hired by complainant. Normally, the shop door was locked with a deadbolt, thereby requiring invitees to ring a doorbell to gain admittance to the shop.

While in the shop, defendant removed complainant’s wallet (which contained several credit cards) from her desk, which was located in a separate room used as a business office. Defendant placed the wallet in his back pocket and attempted to leave the shop, but was apprehended by complainant’s employee.

On appeal, defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence as to the two crimes of which he was convicted.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(People v Malizia,*62 NY2d 755, *cert denied*469 US 932), defendant’s guilt of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree was established beyond a reasonable doubt *(see,*Penal Law § 165.45 [2]). Defendant knowingly possessed complainant’s wallet, which contained several credit cards. Defendant placed the wallet in his back pocket and attempted to leave the shop. Defendant, when confronted, gave complainant a fake name and asked that she not call the police.

The evidence was also sufficient to establish defendant’s guilt of burglary in the second degree *(see,*Penal Law § 140.25). Defendant’s entry into complainant’s business office was unlawful *(see,*Penal Law §§ 140.25, 140.00 [5]; Hechtman, Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 39, Penal Law § 140.00 [1975]). Moreover, the "main building” which the shop was "part of’, was a dwelling house wherein tenants lodged at night (Penal Law §§ 140.25, 140.00 [2], [3], [4]; *see generally, Quinn v People,*71 NY 561, 565-568). Concur —Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger, Asch and Kassal, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 7 (Wednesday, January 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 2748]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-657]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[OPP-00400; FRL-4930-5]


State FIFRA Issues Research and Evaluation Group (SFIREG) Working 
Committee on Water Quality and Pesticide Disposal; Open Meeting

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The State FIFRA Issues Research and Evaluation Group (SFIREG) 
Working Committee on Water Quality and Pesticide Disposal will hold a 
2-day meeting, beginning January 30, 1995, and ending January 31, 1995. 
This notice announces the location and times for the meeting and sets 
forth tentative agenda topics. The meeting is open to the public.

DATES: The Group will meet on Monday, January 30, 1995, from 8:30 a.m. 
to 5 p.m., and Tuesday, January 31, 1995, from 8:30 a.m. until noon.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at: The DoubleTree Hotel, National 
Airport--Crystal City, 300 Army-Navy Drive, Arlington, VA, 703-892-
4100.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By mail: Shirley M. Howard, Office of 
Pesticide Programs (7506C), Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., 
SW., Washington, DC 20460. Office location and telephone number: Rm. 
1100, Crystal Mall No. 2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA, 
703-305-5306.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The tentative agenda of the SFIREG Working 
Committee on Water Quality and Pesticide Disposal includes the 
following:
    1.   Reports from the SFIREG Working Committee members on State 
Water Quality and Pesticide Disposal Projects.
    2.   Summary of the State Management Plan Rule.
    3.   Status of issues resolution conference calls.
    4.   Status of the Restricted Use Rule.
    5.   Discussion of the registration of potential leachers.
    6.   Update on acetochlor registration.
    7.   Discussion of registrant technical bulletins containing state-
specific restrictions.
    8.   Other topics as appropriate.

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection.

    Dated: January 4, 1995.

Allan S. Abramson,
Director, Field Operations Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.

[FR Doc. 95-657 Filed 1-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
Exhibit 99.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


(SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)





In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Fullplay Media Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard Barber, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:





(3)    The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(4)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/    RICHARD BARBERRichard Barber Chief Financial Officer August 14, 2002
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3644

ECM Industries LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

MANDATE

TO THE 330TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF DALLAS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas, on the 26 th day of March , 2018, the cause on appeal to revise or reverse the judgment between

IN THE INTEREST OF J.T.S. AND J.R.S.,

CHILDREN

No. 05

- 17

- 00204

- CV On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas

Tri al Court Cause No. DF

- 16

- 02901. Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges. Justices Evans and Whitehill participating.

was determined; and this Court made its order in these words:

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

AFFIRMED

.

It is ORDERED that appellee Yolanda Smith recover her costs of this appeal from Jshaye Hendrix.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of the Cou rt of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas, in this behalf, and have it duly obeyed and executed.

WITN ESS the HON. CAROLYN WRIGHT, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of Dallas, this 5th day of June, 2018. 

# 5 L M

LISA MATZ, Clerk
1 The HONORABLE D. BROOK BARTLETT, Chief Judge, United States

District Court for the Western District of Missouri.



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-3282/3429

___________ Major Brands, Inc., * * Appellant/Cross-Appellee, * * v. * Appeals from the United States * District Court for the Western International Insurance Company, * District of Missouri. * Appellee/Cross-Appellant; * [UNPUBLISHED] * Royal Insurance Company of America, * * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: May 13, 1999 Filed: May 28, 1999

___________ Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, FLOYD R. GIBSON and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Major Brands appeals the district court's 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in its diversity action against International Insurance Company and Royal Insurance Company. We review a grant of summary judgment under a well-established standard.2 We note that International Insurance Company's cross-appeal is rendered moot

by our disposition of the case. -2- Because this is a diversity case, we review de novo questions of state law. Having consideredthe parties' submissions and heard oral argument, we affirm. We are satisfiedthat the district court correctly applied the controlling law and that no error occurred below. Because the case is governed by state law and an opinion would lack significant

precedential value, we affirm the district court without a comprehensive opinion. 2 See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
3XEOLF9HUVLRQRI%&,

380392/87(&$67,1*35(6685(&217$,1,1*67$,1/(6667((/



3,$==$52%(57

35,&(3803&203$1<

2WKHU

12

3XEOLF9HUVLRQRI%&,
 .*

<(6

12

 .*

 .*

,03257,1*7+,63$57)520&+,1$&2676

385&+$6,1*'20(67,&$//<&267
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-1958

Brooks Instrument LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
ex-10_24.htm










Emmaus Holdings, Inc. 8-K/A


 


 


Exhibit 10.24




AJINOMOTO


AJINOMOTO AMINOSCIENCE LLC


4020 Ajinomoto Drive Raleigh, NC 27610


Tel:  (919) 231-0100 – Fax: (919) 325-1420







January 4, 2010







EMMAUS MEDICAL, INC.


20725 S. Western Ave, Suite 136


Torrance, CA 90501-1884


Attention:  Yutaka Niihara, M.D., President & CEO







Letter of Intent







Dear Dr. Niihara,







On the basis of the discussion with you, we would like to confirm the intention between your company and our company regarding supply of samples and future supply of our products as follows:


 


EMMAUS MEDICAL, INC. (“EMI”) asked AJINOMOTO GROUP to supply L-Glutamine with no monetary payment to proceed its clinical trial (the “Trial”);


 


AJINOMOTO AMINOSCIENCE LLC (“AAS”), as a member of AJINOMOTO GROUP, promised to supply 1,150 kg and more of L-Glutamine with no monetary payment as sample for the Trial;


 


In consideration of the supply of sample L-glutamine with no monetary payment, EMI agrees to purchase or make relevant third party purchase from AAS or any other company of AJINOMOTO GROUP all of the necessary L-Glutamine for commercial use arising out of the fruit of the Trial as its primary supplier, with EMI allowed to source L-Glutamine from third party suppliers on a back up basis, up to 10% of EMI’s requirement.  Provided, however, that if a third party competitor of AJINOMOTO  GROUP offers EMI more favorable price of L-Glutamine of like grade with similar terms and conditions, EMI may report to such offer by written form and reasonably ask AAS or any other company of AJINOMOTO  GROUP to reconsider then-current price; and


 


The above agreement will be reflected in certain supply agreement between EMI (or relevant third party) and AAS (or any other company of AJINOMOTO GROUP).


 




  





  











  






If the content of this letter correctly expresses the intentions and understandings between your company and our company as to the subject matter hereof, please sign and return to us a duplicate copy of this letter for the record of the mutual accord.


 


Yours sincerely


 


/s/ Tatsuya Sato


Tatsuya Sato, Senior Director


 


2/10/2010


 


Agreed:


 


EMMAUS MEDICAL, INC.


 


/s/ Yutaka Niihara


Yutaka Niihara, President & CEO


 


2/11/10