alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

RULE 13(a)-14(b) CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Brandywine Operating Partnership, L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christopher P. Marr ,Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Brandywine Realty Trust, the Partnership’s sole general partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                                                                                                    |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2.     | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership. |

/s/ Christopher P. Marr                                            Christopher P. MarrSenior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate: May 15, 2006

|  |   |
|--|--------|

| * | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Brandywine Realty Trust and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. |
|---|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  |
|--|
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-62402) pertaining to the 1991 Incentive Stock
Option Plan, Stock Grants and Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreements, the
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-93546) pertaining to the 1994 Stock
Option Plan, 1994 Director Stock Option Plan and the Written Compensation
Agreement with R. David Ridgeway, the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No.
333-21699) pertaining to the 1994 Stock Option Plan, the Registration Statement
on Form s-* (No. 333-21701) pertaining to the 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
and Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreements, the Registration Statement on Form
S-3 (No. 333-06865) pertaining to the registration of 1,614,802 shares of common
stock, the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-14483) pertaining to the
registration of 1,125,580 shares of common stock, the Registration Statement on
Form S-3 (No. 333-21117) pertaining to the registration of 493,895 shares of
common stock, the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-28315) pertaining
to the registration of 318,607 shares of common stock, the Registration
Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-18575) pertaining to the registration of
5,000,000 shares of common stock and $5,000,000 of debt securities, the
Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-53327) pertaining to the
registration of 421,528 shares of common stock, the Registration Statement on
Form S-3 (No. 333-60637) pertaining to the registration of 1,580,500 shares of
common stock, the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-67381) pertaining
to the registration of 150,000 shares of common stock, the Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-86867) pertaining to the registration of 425,000
shares of common stock, of INTELEFILM Corporation of our report dated February
8, 2000, except for notes 8 and 10 dated March 17, 2000 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Reports (Forms 10-KSB)
for the years ended December 31, 1999 and December 31, 1998.


         /s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
         BDO Seidman, LLP
         Milwaukee, Wisconsin
         March 27, 2000
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 58 (Monday, March 27, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15793]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7482]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-30,361]


Wailuku Agribusiness Co., Inc., Pineapple Division, Wailuku, HI; 
Revised Determination on Reconsideration

    On February 10, 1995, the Department issued an Affirmative 
Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration for the workers 
and former workers of the subject firm. The notice was published in the 
Federal Register on February 27, 1995 (60 FR 9409).
    The findings show that the workers produce pineapples and macadamia 
nuts with pineapples being the preponderant portion of sales. The 
findings show that sales and production of pineapples declined in the 
first nine months of 1994 compared to the same period in 1993. 
Substantial worker separations occurred in 1994.
    New findings on reconsideration show that all the pineapples grown 
and harvested are sold to an exclusive purchaser whose workers are 
under a trade adjustment assistance certification. By virtue of the 
fact that there is only one customer, the customer exercised de facto 
control over the production, sales and employment of pineapples at the 
subject firm. Accordingly, the workers meet the Department's standard 
of a reduced demand for their products from a parent or controlling 
firm whose workers produce an article and are currently under a 
certification for TAA.

Conclusion

    After careful consideration of the new facts obtained on 
reconsideration, it is concluded that the workers and former workers of 
Wailuku Agribusiness Company, Inc., Pineapple Division, Wailuku Hawaii 
were adversely affected by increased imports of articles like or 
directly competitive with pineapples.
    Accordingly, in accordance with the provisions of the Act, I make 
the following certification:

    All workers of Wailuku Agribusiness Company, Inc., in Wailuku, 
Hawaii who became totally or partially separated from employment on 
or after September 14, 1993 are eligible to apply for adjustment 
assistance under section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 14th day of March, 1995.
Victor J. Trunzo,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 95-7482 Filed 3-24-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 55 (Wednesday, March 22, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15147]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6997]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)


The National Center for Environmental Health (NCEH) of the 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Will Convene the 
Following Meeting Sponsored by the Division of Environmental Health 
Laboratory Sciences

    Name: Development of Innovative Technology for Measurement of 
Lead in Blood: Meeting of Grant Recipients and Cooperative Research 
and Development Agreement (CRADA) Partners.
    Time and date: 8:30 a.m.-11 a.m., May 20, 1995.
    Place: Terrace Garden Inn-Buckhead, 3405 Lenox Road, NE, 
Atlanta, Georgia 30326.
    Status: Open to the public, limited only by space available.
    Purpose: The primary purpose of this meeting is to brief the 
grantees and CDC's CRADA partners about CDC expectations for the 
grant and CRADA program, to encourage collaboration among grantees 
and CRADA partners and to review progress toward the objectives of 
the program.
    Matters to be discussed: Topics to be discussed include 
objectives of the CDC grant and CRADA program for the development of 
innovative technology for the measurement of lead in blood, impact 
of the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Act on the technology, and an 
overview of each grantee and CRADA organization.
    Agenda items are subject to change as priorities dictate.
    Contact person for more information: Robert L. Jones, Ph.D., 
Supervisory Research Chemist, Nutritional Biochemistry Branch, 
Division of Environmental Health Laboratory Sciences, (F18), NCEH, 
CDC, 4770 Buford Highway, NE, Chamblee, Georgia 30341-3724, 
telephone 404/488-7991.
    Written comments are welcome and should be received by the 
contact person no later than May 10, 1995. Persons wishing to make 
oral comments at the meeting should notify the contact person in 
writing or by telephone no later than May 10, 1995. All requests to 
make oral comments should contain the name, address, telephone 
number, and organizational affiliation of the presenter. Depending 
on the time available and the number of requests to make oral 
comments, it may be necessary to limit the time of each presenter.
Carolyn J. Russell,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention (CDC).
[FR Doc. 95-6997 Filed 3-21-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7577

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

LORI D. BLAKELY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (CR-97-678, CA-98-1893-3-17)

Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: March 2, 1999

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lori D. Blakely, Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Barton, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Lori D. Blakely seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on her petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West

1994 & Supp. 1998) and order denying a certificate of appealability

on appeal. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Blakely,

Nos. CR-97-678; CA-98-1893-3-17 (D.S.C. Sept. 9 and 23, 1998). We

deny Blakely’s motion expedite as moot. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Charlotte SUMMERS, Petitioner/Respondent, v. James SUMMERS, Respondent/Appellant.

No. 62620.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

March 8, 1994.

Michael T. Cady, St. Louis, for respondent/appellant.

John T. Allan, Clayton, for petitioner/respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

*147
      *ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Husband appeals that portion of the dissolution decree relating to the distribution of marital property. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. A written opinion would have no precedential value. Rule 84.16(b).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ICG SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES FOR THE
SIX MONTHS  ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                          186,691
<SECURITIES>                    0 <F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                   103,130
<ALLOWANCES>                    566
<INVENTORY>                     2,258
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                296,235
<PP&E>                          1,252,268
<DEPRECIATION>                  110,017
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,494,551
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           422,905
<BONDS>                          894,370
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0 <F1>
<PREFERRED>                     0 <F1>
<COMMON>                        0 <F1>
<OTHER-SE>                      98,130
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    1,494,551
<SALES>                         0 <F1>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                109,193
<CGS>                           0<F1>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   23,246
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                46,387
<LOSS-PROVISION>                577
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              54,526
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (8,935)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0<F1>
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (18,588)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0 <F1>
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0 <F1>
<CHANGES>                       0 <F1>
<NET-INCOME>                    (18,588)
<EPS-BASIC>                     0 <F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0 <F1>



</TABLE>
Order filed May 5 , 2022

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 21

- 00589

- CV

____________ SYLVIA COOKE , Appellant

V.

RACHEL BAIER , Appellee

On Appeal from County Court at Law No 2 Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CV

- 0 087510



### ORDER
Appellee ’ s brief filed April 13, 2022 , requests this court di smiss the appeal
on the grounds it was not timely filed
, and app ellant ’ s bri ef was not timely filed. The request is denied.
Appell an t ’ s notice of ap peal was filed wi thin 15 days o f the date the notice of appeal was due. A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when the perfecting instrument is filed within 15 days of its due date. Verburgt v. Dorner,959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). While an extension may be implied, a ppellant is obligated to come forward with a reasonable explanation to supp ort the late filing. See Miller v. Greenpark Surgery Center Assocs., Ltd. , 974 S.W.2d 805, 808 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, no pet.). Appellant file d a motion to extend ti m e to file the notice of appeal and the motion was granted. Accordingly, this court has jurisdiction over the appeal.
Appellant ’ s brief was e

- filed two minutes after midnight on the due date. We
declin e to dismiss the appeal on that basis.
Appellee may fil e an amended brief with in 30 days of the date of this order addressing the issues raised in appel lant ’ s brief. If no amended brief is filed, the appeal will be set for submission on appellee ’ s brief filed April 13, 2022.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Just i ces Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wise and Jewell.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markm an

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis,

Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk November 3, 2010

p1027 

# Order

November 3, 2010

141469

TIMOTHY J. WHITE,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 141469

COA: 291144

Jackson CC: 08

- 003665

- NF

PROGRESSIVE MICHIGAN INSURANCE

COMPANY,

Defendant

- Appellee,

and

BRIAN SCOTT WILLIAMS,

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 15, 2010

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

December 21, 2005

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

TERRY DON MYERS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

MIKE ADDISON, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

No. 04-6381

(D.C. No. CIV-04-913-L)

(W.D. Okla.)

ORDER

Before EBEL, McKAY and HENRY, Circuit Judges.

Terry Myers, an Oklahoma state prisoner serving three consecutive 99-year

sentences, seeks a certificate of appealability (“COA”) following the district

court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. He also seeks to proceed in

forma pauperis on appeal. Mr. Myers’s underlying claim is that the Oklahoma

state courts have denied his constitutional due process and equal protection rights

by denying his request for free copies of his trial transcripts. In his habeas

petition, he does not seek a release from custody, but rather an order that the

transcripts be provided to him free of cost. The district court assigned the case to

a magistrate judge, who provided a thorough analysis of Mr. Myers’s claims and

recommended that his petition be denied.
- 2 -

To obtain a COA, a petitioner must make “a substantial showing of the

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). For the reasons given

in the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation, we conclude that Mr.

Myers cannot make such a showing. We therefore DENY his request for a COA

and DISMISS this appeal. We also DENY his request to proceed in forma

pauperis on appeal.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

David M. Ebel

Circuit Judge
CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with Spectrum Group International, Inc.'s (the “Company”) annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010, as amended, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of


operations of the Company.








Date:  April 8, 2011/s/ Gregory N. RobertsName:  Gregory N. RobertsTitle:    President & Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of Periodic Report


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Pursuant to, and for purposes only of, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned hereby certifies that (i) the Quarterly Report of Peoples Bancorp, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Peoples Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries.




Date:  May 13, 2011
/s/ Thomas G. StevensonThomas G. StevensonPresident/Chief Executive Officer& Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 55 (Wednesday, March 22, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15164]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7045]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-30,633]


Karlshamns USA, Incorporated, Harrison, New Jersey; Notice of 
Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on January 9, 1995 in response to a worker petition which 
was filed on behalf of workers and former workers at Karlshamns USA, 
Incorporated, Harrison, New Jersey (TA-W-30,633).
    The company has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no 
purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 9th day of March, 1995.
Victor J. Trunzo,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 95-7045 Filed 3-21-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
##### 



Exhibit 12.1 STATER BROS. HOLDINGS INC.
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(Dollar amounts in thousands) Fiscal Years EndedSept. 24,(2)
    
    
    Sept. 30,(1)( 2)
    
    
    Sept. 29,(2)
    
    
    Sept. 28,(2)
    
    
    Sept. 26,(2)2000
    
    
    2001
    
    
    2002
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2004(as restated)
    
    
    (as restated)
    
    
    (as restated)
    
    
    (as restated)
    
    
    (as restated)Earnings:Income (loss) before income taxes
    
    $
    (10,437
    )
    
    $
    13,897
    
    
    $
    18,510
    
    
    $
    15,946
    
    
    $
    111,140Amortization of capitalized
interest
    
    
    326
    
    
    
    338
    
    
    
    341
    
    
    
    352
    
    
    
    302Interest
    
    
    53,040
    
    
    
    53,846
    
    
    
    53,086
    
    
    
    52,524
    
    
    
    78,790Less interest capitalized
during the period
    
    
    (35
    )
    
    
    (238
    )
    
    
    (144
    )
    
    
    (144
    )
    
    
    (323
    )Net amortization of debt
discount and premium
and issuance expense
    
    
    2,542
    
    
    
    2,532
    
    
    
    3,158
    
    
    
    3,158
    
    
    
    11,321Interest portion of rental expense
    
    
    20,333
    
    
    
    21,407
    
    
    
    21,848
    
    
    
    22,740
    
    
    
    23,979Earnings as adjusted
    
    $
    65,769
    
    
    $
    91,782
    
    
    $
    96,799
    
    
    $
    94,576
    
    
    $
    225,209Fixed Charges:Interest
    
    $
    53,040
    
    
    $
    53,846
    
    
    $
    53,086
    
    
    $
    52,524
    
    
    $
    78,790Net amortization of debt
discount and premium
and issuance expense
    
    
    2,542
    
    
    
    2,532
    
    
    
    3,158
    
    
    
    3,158
    
    
    
    11,321Interest portion of rental
expense
    
    
    20,333
    
    
    
    21,407
    
    
    
    21,848
    
    
    
    22,740
    
    
    
    23,979Fixed Charges
    
    $
    75,915
    
    
    $
    77,785
    
    
    $
    78,092
    
    
    $
    78,422
    
    
    $
    114,090Ratio of Earnings to
Fixed Charges
    
    
    0.87
    
    
    
    1.18
    
    
    
    1.24
    
    
    
    1.21
    
    
    
    1.97
   (1)
    53-Week Fiscal Year  (2)
    Includes the Companys 50% share of Santee. For fiscal 2004, includes the Companys 50%
share of Santee through February 6, 2004. Santee has been consolidated into the Companys
consolidated results since that date.