1 Filed 5/28/14 P. v. Vang CA3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Butte)

----

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. CHENG VANG, Defendant and Appellant. C074538

(Super. Ct. Nos. CM035491, CM036606)

On November 13, 2011, an officer initiated a tra ffic stop on defendant Cheng Vang. Vang told the officer he was on paro le, admitted having a po und of marijuana in the car, and provided a copy of his medical recommendati on. The officer searched the car and found 1.1 grams of me thamphetamine, a glass smoking pipe, two cell phones, and three bags that contained a total of 36.65 ounces of marijuana. During booking, defendant was found with two bags in his hand, believed to have been previously concealed in his mouth, containing a total of 2.75 grams of metham phetamine. One of2 the cell phones contained text messages regard ing the sale and purchase of narcotics in which defendant’s name was specifically mentioned. On June 4, 2012, sheriff’s deputies c onducted a parole sear ch of defendant’s apartment and found 27 acetami nophen and hydrocodon e pills, two .22-caliber rifles, and two boxes of ammunition. Defendant, who was outside during the search, fled, but was apprehended after a short chase. In case No. CM035491, defendant plea ded no contest to possession of methamphetamine for sale and admitted a prior conviction for the same offense. (Health & Saf. Code, §§ 11378, 11370.2.) In case No. CM036606, defendant pleaded no contest to felon in possession of a firearm. (Pen. Code, § 29800, subd. (a)(1).) Sentencing defendant in both cases, the trial court sentenced him to six years eight months in state prison, imposed various fines and fees, and awarded 249 days of presentence credits in case No. CM035491 (125 actual and 124 conduc t) and 441 days of presentence credits in case No. CM0366 06 (221 actual and 220 conduct). Defendant appeals. He did not obtain a certificate of probable cause. We appointed counsel to represent defenda nt on appeal. Counsel filed an opening

brief that sets forth the facts of the case a nd requests this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. ( People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advi sed by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the op ening brief. More than 30 days elapsed, and

we received no communication from defendant.

There is an error in the amended abstra ct stating the enhancement for a prior drug conviction applies to the po ssession of a firearm count ra ther than the possession of methamphetamine for sale. We shall or der a correction to the abstract. Having undertaken an examination of th e entire record, we find no arguable error that would result in a dispositi on more favorable to defendant.3 DISPOSITION The judgment is affirmed. The trial court is directed to issue a corrected abstract of judgment showing the prior drug convictio n enhancement applies to the possession of methamphetamine count, and to forward the corrected abstract of judgment to the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.

NICHOLSON , Acting P. J.

We concur:

BUTZ , J.

MURRAY , J.