15320 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 56 / Thursday, March 23, 1995 / Notices

11 15 U.S.C. 78f (1988).

12 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2) (1988).

13 17 CFR 200.30(a)(12) (1994).

to balance the perceived anticompetitive

effects of a regulatory policy or decision

against the purpose of the Act that

would be advanced by the policy or

decisions and the costs associated

therewith. The Commission notes that

any anticompetitive effects pointed to

by Thomson are not caused by the

proposed rule change being approved by

this order but rather by an existing Phlx

rule. The Commission is reviewing

Thomson’s claim but does not believe

that approval of this proposal will itself

create any burdens on competition.

Moreover, as discussed above, the rule

advances fundamental purposes under

the Act, namely the efficient clearance

and settlement of securities.

IV. Conclusion

For the reasons stated above, the

Commission finds that Phlx’s proposal

is consistent with Section 6 of the Act.11

It Is Therefore Ordered, pursuant to

Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,12 that the

proposed rule change (File No. SR–

Phlx–94–55) be and hereby is approved

and will become effective June 7, 1995.

For the Commission by the Division of

Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated

authority.13

Margaret H. McFarland,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–7137 Filed 3–22–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 2181]

United States International

Telecommunications Advisory

Committee Radiocommunication

Sector Joint Ad Hoc Working Party 7B

and 9D; Meeting Notice

The Department of State announces

that the United States International

Telecommunications Advisory

Committee (ITAC),

Radiocommunication Sector Joint Ad

Hoc Working Party 7B and 9D will meet

on 13 April 1995 at 1:30 to 4:30 p.m.,

in the conference room at the facilities

of Stanford Telecom, Inc., 7501 Forbes

Blvd., Suite 105, Seabrook, MD.

Joint Ad Hoc Working Party 7B and

9D has been established to develop

recommendations that lead to a stable,

long term sharing environment for the

fixed service and the space research,

space operation and Earth explorationsatellite services in the 2025–2110 MHz

and 2200–2290 MHz bands; and also to

develop a recommendation on the

e.i.r.p. spectral density of fixed service

emissions in the 25.25–27.5 GHz band

that are directed towards the

geostationary orbit.

This April Meeting will review the

results of the Joint Ad Hoc WP 7B and

9D meeting, 3–4 November 1994 and

begin preparations for the 21–24 July

international meeting.

Members of the General Public may

attend the meetings and join in the

discussions, subject to the instructions

of the Chairman, John E. Miller. Those

persons who wish to attend, please call

(301) 464–8900 or fax (301) 262–2642

and leave your name, address, phone

and fax numbers.

Dated: March 13, 1995.

Warren G. Richards,

Chairman, U.S. ITAC for ITURadiocommunication Sector.

[FR Doc. 95–7163 Filed 3–22–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710–45–M

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Intent To Prepare Supplemental

Environmental Impact Statement; Cal

Black Memorial Airport, Halls

Crossing, UT

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

SUMMARY: The Northwest Mountain

Region of the FAA announces: its intent

to prepare Draft and Final Supplemental

Environmental Impact Statements

(SEIS) for further study of potential

noise impacts associated with operation

of Cal Black Memorial Airport at Halls

Crossing, Utah and that the Federal SEIS

scoping process will consist of a time

period for interested agencies and

persons to submit written comments as

to their concerns regarding potential

noise impacts upon areas surrounding

the airport and how those impacts could

be addressed in the Draft SEIS.

DATES: In order to be considered,

written comments must be received by

Mr. Dennis G. Ossenkop, Federal

Aviation Administration, Airports

Division, 1601 Lind Ave. S.W., Renton,

WA 98055–4056, Telephone: (206) 277–

2611 on or before June 30, 1995.

Questions concerning the draft SEIS

or the process being applied by the FAA

in connection with this study should

also be directed to Mr. Ossenkop.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This SEIS

is being prepared in response to the

court’s decision in National Parks and

Conservation Association v. F.A.A., 988

F.2d 1523 (10th Cir., 1993), which

reserved the agency’s determination of

no significant impact from airport

operations on visitors to surrounding

recreational areas, and remanded the

matter back to the agency for further

analysis. Information, data, views and

comments obtained in the course of the

SEIS scoping process may be used in the

preparation of the draft SEIS. The

purpose of this notice is to inform the

public and state, local and Federal

governmental agencies of the fact that a

draft SEIS will be prepared and to

provide those interested in doing so

with an opportunity to present their

views, comments, information, data, or

other relevant observations concerning

the potential noise impacts on

surrounding recreational areas, related

to the operation of Cal Black Memorial

Airport. It is not the intent of FAA to

revisit any other environmental issue

evaluated in the 1990 EIS, in this SEIS.

The May 1990 Final EIS and August

1990 FAA Record of Decision related to

the construction of the airport can be

reviewed at the following locations:

San Juan County Courthouse, Monticello,

Utah 84535.

Federal Aviation Administration, Airports

Division, 1601 Lind Ave. S.W., Renton,

WA 98056–4056.

Denver Airports District Office, 5440 Roslyn,

Suite 300, Denver, CO 80216–6026.

Issued in Renton, Washington on March 9,

1995.

David A. Field,

Acting Manager, Airports Division, Federal

Aviation Administration, Northwest

Mountain Region, Renton, Washington.

[FR Doc. 95–7190 Filed 3–22–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

[Summary Notice No. PE–95–13]

Petitions For Exemption; Summary of

Petitions Received; Dispositions of

Petitions Issued

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of petitions for

exemption received and of dispositions

of prior petitions.

SUMMARY: Pursuant to FAA’s rulemaking

provisions governing the application,

processing, and disposition of petitions

for exemption (14 CFR Part 11), this

notice contains a summary of certain

petitions seeking relief from specified

requirements of the Federal Aviation

Regulations (14 CFR Chapter I),

dispositions of certain petitions

previously received, and corrections.

The purpose of this notice is to improve

the public’s awareness of, and