alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
    
    The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended September 30,
2007 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Jack H. Brown
 /s/ Phillip J. Smith
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                     OF THE

                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                             DELICIOUS BRANDS, INC.

                Under Section 242 of the General Corporation Law
                        of the State of Delaware ("DCGL")
================================================================================

         Delicious Brands, Inc., a corporation  organized and existing under the
laws of the State of Delaware (the "Corporation"), hereby certifies as follows:

         FIRST:  That the Board of  Directors of the  Corporation,  by unanimous
written consent,  and the  Stockholders of the Corporation,  by majority written
consent pursuant to Section 228 of the DCGL, adopted a resolution  approving and
adopting  the  following  amendment  to  Article  FIRST  of the  Certificate  of
Incorporation of the Corporation as follows:

         RESOLVED,  that the Corporation be, and hereby is,  authorized to amend
         its Certificate of Incorporation to change the Corporation's  name from
         Delicious Brands, Inc., to Next Generation Technology Holdings, Inc. by
         deleting Article FIRST thereof and inserting in its place the following
         Article FIRST:

                  "FIRST:  The name of the corporation is Next Generation
                           Technology Holdings, Inc.";


         IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the Corporation has caused this certificate to be
signed by its duly authorized officer, this 1 day of June, 2000.


                                  DELICIOUS BRANDS, INC.


                                  By: /s/ Thomas J. Guinan
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                  Name:    Thomas J. Guinan
                                  Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 23.2

        Consent of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

    



                           Independent Auditor's Consent


        The Board of Directors
        Paracelsian, Inc.

        We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
        No. 333-8333 on Form S-3, and Registration Statement No. 333-14215 on
        Form S-3, of Paracelsian, Inc. of our report dated November 22, 1996,
        relating to the consolidated balance sheet of Paracelsian, Inc. and
        subsidiary as of September 30, 1996, and the related consolidated
        statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the
        year ended September 30, 1996, which report appears in the
        September 30, 1996 annual report on Form 10-KSB of Paracelsian, Inc.




                                   /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
                                   KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP


        New York, New York
        December 27, 1996
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-3378

Crane Pumps & Systems: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. David BANKS, Appellant. David BANKS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. 66168, 68260.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

Dec. 19, 1995.

Douglas R. Hoff, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Christine M. Blegen, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before AHRENS, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and GRIMM, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the judgment entered on his conviction by a jury of two counts of first degree burglary, § 569.170; four counts of first degree robbery, § 569.020; one count of second degree robbery, § 569.030; and two counts of armed criminal action, § 571.015. He also appeals from the motion court’s denial of postconvietion relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The judgments of the trial court and motion court *101are affirmed pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b), respectively.
Exhibit 31.1
I, Louis LeCalsey, III, President and Chief Executive Officer of TufcoTechnologies, Inc., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Tufco Technologies,Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisReport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation includedin this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,and for, the periods presented in this Report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this Report is beingprepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this Report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this Report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.
Date: December 29, 2004
/s/ Louis LeCalsey, IIILouis LeCalsey, III
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-25-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-26-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           2,379
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  112,372
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,178
<INVENTORY>                                    105,924
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               226,786
<PP&E>                                         178,931
<DEPRECIATION>                                  62,584
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 419,737
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          192,769
<BONDS>                                        404,214
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            59
<OTHER-SE>                                   (139,328)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   419,737
<SALES>                                        218,617
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               218,617
<CGS>                                          136,351
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  136,351
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                85,814
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   510
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,383
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (22,931)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,487)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (22,931)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (20,444)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1180

SHIRE LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

SANDOZ, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado in

case no. 07-CV-00197, Judge Philip A. Brimmer.

ON MOTION

Before MAYER Circuit Judge.

ORDER

IXYS Corporation and EML Technologies, LLC move for leave to file a brief

amicus curiae in support of Shire LLC.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted.

FOR THE COURT

JUL 2 9 2009 /s/ Jan Horbalv

Date	 Jan Horbaly

Clerk

cc:	Keith D. Parr, Esq.	 FILE

U.S. COURT OF Edward H. Haug, Esq.	 THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

R. Carl Moy, Esq.

Sharon A. Israel, Esq.

JUL 2 9 2009

JAN HORBALY

CLERK
Roger Cook, Esq.

Charles A. Weiss, Esq.

Kevin P. Martin, Esq.

s19

2009-1180	 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          62,288
<SECURITIES>                                    28,659
<RECEIVABLES>                                  137,129
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,287
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               269,682
<PP&E>                                         101,144
<DEPRECIATION>                                  48,017
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 367,674
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           90,535
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           621
<OTHER-SE>                                     276,415
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   367,674
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               628,111
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  660,060
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (35,485)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                12,487
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 118
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,418
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,299
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,119
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,119
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03


</TABLE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 13, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3640

Omega Environmental Technologies, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstancesset forth in 5

TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

_________________

No. 98-30455

Summary Calendar

_________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TERRANCE D. GLASPIE,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

(97-CR-20098-1)

June 17, 1999

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Terrance D. Glaspie, Defendant-Appellant, appeals his jury-verdict conviction and sentence

for aiding and abetting another person to possess with intent to distribute cocaine base. He argues

for the first time on appeal that one witness’s testimony against him at trial was improper pursuant

to 18 U.S.C. § 201(c)(2) because it was given in exchange fo r leniency by the Government. We,

however, have previouslyrejected such an argument. See United States v. Haese, 162 F.3d 359, 366-

67 (5th Cir. 1998), petition for cert. filed, (U.S. Apr. 15, 1999) (No. 98-9005).

Glaspie also contends that the district court erred by denying his motion to suppress

incriminating post-arrest statements he made to FBI agents after waiving his rights under Miranda

v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 88 S. Ct. 1602, 16 L. Ed. 2d 694 (1966), because the statements were not
-2-

voluntary and, therefore, were inadmissable under FED.R.CRIM. P. 11(e)(6) and FED. R. EVID. 410.

After considering the factors set forth in Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218, 225-26 (1973),

we conclude that Glaspie’s statements “were the product of his free and rational choice.” United

States v. Restrepo, 994 F.2d 173, 183 (5th Cir. 1993). In addition, because Glaspie was not

negotiating an actual plea with a government attorney, his statements were not inadmissable under

FED. R. CRIM. P. 11(e)(6) and FED. R. EVID. 410. See United States v. Robertson, 582 F.2d 1356,

1368 (5th Cir. 1978).

Glaspie also argues that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence

seized from his girlfriend’s automobile. We conclude that Glaspie did not have standing to contest

the search ofthe vehicle because he did not establish an objectivelyreasonable expectation of privacy.

See United States v. Riazco, 91 F.3d 752, 754 (5th Cir. 1996).

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Aethlon Medical, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for
the year ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, James A. Joyce, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

1. Such annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

2. The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Aethlon Medical, Inc.

Date: September 8, 2004.


                  BY: /S/ JAMES A. JOYCE
                      JAMES A. JOYCE
                      CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Aethlon Medical, Inc. and will be
retained by Aethlon Medical, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 40 (Wednesday, March 1, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 11115]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4928]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Petroleum Environmental Research Forum

    Notice is hereby given that, on January 10, 1995, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the Petroleum Environmental 
Research Forum (``PERF'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing a change in its membership. The notifications 
were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting 
the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, Lockheed Corporation has terminated its 
membership with PERF.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of PERF. Membership remains open, and PERF intends to file 
additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership.
    On February 10, 1986, PERF filed its original notification pursuant 
to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a 
notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on 
March 14, 1986 (51 FR 8903).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on August 23, 
1993. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on September 21, 1993 (58 FR 49059).
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 95-4928 Filed 2-28-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
<PAGE>
 
                                                                     EXHIBIT 23
 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-39485) pertaining to the Paragon Health Network, Inc., Long-
Term Incentive Plan, GranCare, Inc., 401(k) Savings Plan, GranCare, Inc., 1996
Stock Incentive Plan, GranCare, Inc., 1996 Replacement Stock Option Plan,
GranCare, Inc., Outside Directors' Stock Incentive Plan of our report dated
December 10, 1997, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of Paragon Health Network, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended September 30, 1997, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
 
                                          ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
Houston, Texas
December 26, 1997
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-1815

GHL International, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel