alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3425

Scosche Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Section 301 Investigation: China's Acts, Policies, and Practices Related to Technology 

Transfer, Intellectual Property, and Innovation - Form to Request Exclusion of Product 

When submitting a product exclusion request using this form, enter the specified 

information in the following fields and explain the basis and rationale for your statements. 

By completing this form, you certify that the information provided is complete and 

correct to the best of your knowledge. 

1. Indicate whether the comment contains business confidential information (BCI), is a public 

document, or is a public version of a BCI document. 

Public Version of BCI 

2. Please provide a complete and detailed description of the product of concern: 

Please see Exhibit 1 to attached narrative explanation for this Request. 

3. 10-digit HTSUS item number* for product you wish to address in this product exclusion request: 

*Use numerical characters only with no special characters (example: 1023456789). For help in finding 

the HTSUS item number associated with your product, see https://hts.usitc.gov/ 

8419.90.3000 

4. Requestor Information 

Requestor Name (Last, First): 

Organization Name: 

Ward, Tyler 

Varex Imaging Corporation 

Note: Representatives submitting on behalf of an organization must enter information below. 

Requestor Representative: Nelson G. Dong, Troy Keller, T. Augustine Lo (Dorsey & Whitney LLP) 

5. Requestor's relationship to the product: Importer 

6. Does this submission in regulations.govinclude additional attachments? 

YES 

7. Please indicate whether any additional attachment contains business confidential 

information (BCI), is a public document, or is a public version of a BCI document. 

Public Version of BCI 

VERSION I CONTINUED BELOW 1 
B. Is this product, or a comparable product, available from sources in the United States?: 

NO 

9. Is this product, or a comparable product, available from sources in third countries?: 

NO 

10. Please provide the value and quantity (with units) of the Chinese-origin product of concern 

that you purchased for each calendar year specified. Limit this figure to the products 

purchased by your firm (or by members of your trade association) alone. Please provide 

estimates if precise figures are unavailable. 

2017 Value: BCI 2017 Quantity: BCI 

2016 Value: N/A 2016 Quantity: N/A 

2015 Value: N/A 2015 Quantity: N/A 

11. Please provide information in support your request, taking account of the instructions 

provided in Section B of the Federal Register notice (note: text entered below can extend 

beyond the apparent size of this box). 

Please see the attached narrative explanation for this Request. We note in particular Section V.A, 

which relates to Questions 8 and 9 above. 

VERSION 1 END 2
EX-10.2




 Exhibit 10.2 

Form of Amendment to Lock-Up Agreement 

AMENDMENT TO LOCK-UP AGREEMENT 

This Amendment to Lock-Up Agreement (this “Amendment”) is made as of January 4,
2023 (the “Effective Date”) by and among Peak Bio, Inc. (f/k/a Ignyte Acquisition Corp.), a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), Peak Bio Co., Ltd., a corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of Korea
(“Peak Bio Korea”), and certain stockholders of Peak Bio Korea (the “Lock-Up Parties”). 

WHEREAS, the Company, Peak Bio Korea, and the executive officers and members of the board of directors of the Company and stockholders of Peak
Bio Korea are parties to that certain Lock-Up Agreement dated as of November 1, 2022 (the “Lock-Up Agreement”) (capitalized terms used herein and
not otherwise defined herein have the meanings ascribed to them in the Lock-Up Agreement); and 

WHEREAS, the Company, Peak Bio Korea, and a majority in interest of the Lock-Up Parties wish to amend
the Lock-Up Agreement with this Amendment. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree to amend the Lock-Up Agreement as follows: 
 1. Release of 30% of
Lock-Up Securities from Lock-Up. 
 The
parties to the Lock-Up Agreement hereby agree that, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Lock-Up Agreement, the restriction on Transfer of Lock-Up Securities Beneficially Owned shall not apply to 30% of the Lock-Up Securities Beneficially Owned by a Lock-Up Party. 

2. Continuation of Lock-Up Agreement as Amended. Except as modified by this
Amendment, the Lock-Up Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. 
 [Signature Page
Follows] 











 The parties have executed this Amendment to Lock-Up
Agreement as of the date first set forth above. 
  

			
	THE COMPANY:
	
	PEAK BIO, INC.
		
	By:	 	 
		 	(Signature)
	Name:	 	Stephen LaMond
	Title:	 	Interim CEO and COO


 Signature Page to Amendment to Lock-Up Agreement












 The parties have executed this Amendment to Lock-Up
Agreement as of the date first set forth above. 
  

			
	LOCK-UP PARTIES:
		
	By:	 	 
		 	Name:
		 	Title:


  

			
	 Address for Notice:



 Signature Page to Amendment to Lock-Up Agreement
MOTOR MODEL: RF300

VIEW 1 VIEW 2 VIEW 3
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Roy WALLACE, Appellant.

No. WD 47851.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

March 28, 1995.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 2, 1995.

Application to Transfer Denied May 30, 1995.

Patricia A. Richter, Asst. Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Cheryl A. Caponegro, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before SPINDEN, P.J., and ULRICH and SMART, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Roy Wallace was convicted of two counts of violating § 195.211, RSMo 1994 (sale of a controlled substance). He was sentenced to 10 years imprisonment. He claims on appeal that the trial court erred in denying his defense counsel an opportunity to make a closing argument before announcing the decision. He also claims there was insufficient evidence that he was a participant in the prohibited transactions. He also appeals the denial of relief by the Rule 29.15 motion court on grounds that the evidence showed he was denied effective assistance of counsel in that counsel failed to conduct a reasonable investigation to locate a potential witness.

Wallace’s contentions on appeal are without merit. The judgment of conviction, and the judgment denying post-conviction relief are affirmed. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 7 (Wednesday, January 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 2801]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-659]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[File No. 1-9453]


Issuer Delisting; Notice of Application to Withdraw From Listing 
and Registration; (Ark Restaurants Corp., Common Stock, $.01 Par Value)

January 5, 1995.
    Ark Restaurants Corp. (``company'') has filed an application with 
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to 
Section 12(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') and Rule 
12d2-2(d) promulgated thereunder, to withdraw the above specified 
security (``Security'') from listing and registration on the American 
Stock Exchange, Inc. (``Amex'').
    The reasons alleged in the application for withdrawing the Security 
from listing and registration include the following:
    According to the Company, the Security commenced trading on the 
National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations/
National Market Systems (``NASDAQ/NMS'') at the opening of business on 
December 1, 1994 and concurrently therewith such stock was suspended 
from trading on the Amex.
    The Company believes that the NASDAQ/NMS multiple market maker 
approach will provide the Company with higher visability within the 
financial community, thereby enhancing investor awareness of the 
Company's activities;
    In addition, the Company believes NASDAQ/NMS will provide brokers 
and others with immediate access to the bid and ask prices, plus other 
information about the Security throughout the trading day, will result 
in increased visibility and sponsorship of the Security, and will offer 
shareholders greater liquidity than presently offered on the Amex.
    Any interested person may, on or before January 27, 1995 submit by 
letter to the Secretary of the Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 
Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549, facts bearing upon whether 
the application has been made in accordance with the rules of the 
exchange and what terms, if any, should be imposed by the Commission 
for the protection of investors. The Commission, based on the 
information submitted to it, will issue an order granting the 
application after the date mentioned above, unless the Commission 
determines to order a hearing on the matter.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
pursuant to delegated authority.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-659 Filed 1-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Marvin Tention, Appellant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Paul P. E. Bookson, J., at jury trial and sentence), rendered February 23, 1989, convicting defendant of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.39) and sentencing him, as a predicate felon, to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of from 5 to 10 years, unanimously affirmed.

Upon viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People, we find it legally sufficient to establish defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt *(People v Contes,*60 NY2d *356620, 621; *People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495). Although defendant was silent throughout the drug transaction between codefendant and the undercover officer, the jury, in perceiving the reality of the situation, was well within its province to conclude that defendant’s conduct demonstrated an interest in promoting the transaction *(People v Argibay,*45 NY2d 45, 53-54, *cert denied sub nom. Hahn-Di-Guiseppe v New York,*439 US 930; *People v Lam Lek Chong,*45 NY2d 64, *cert denied*439 US 935). When the undercover officer asked for drugs of a particular brand name, defendant went directly to codefendant, obviously known to him as a seller of such a commodity, and accompanied codefendant back to where the officer waited. There, although mute, he awaited completion of the transaction. This conduct bespeaks involvement beyond being a mere extension of the buyer. Concur—Ross, J. P., Carro, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 13, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2874

Advanced Cooling Tech:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 40286 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

MIKEAEL LAKIEATH BOWEN, also known as Fat Mac, also known as Bull , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:17

- CR

- 25

- 3

Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Mikeael Lakieath Bowen has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Bowen has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed
to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Bowen ’s claim of ine ffective ass istance of counsel , to the extent that he raises one ; we therefore decline to consider the

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 18, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-40286 Document: 00514765508 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/18/2018No. 18

- 40286

2 claim without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar , 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014 )

. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Bowen ’s respon se. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See
5 TH C IR

. R . 42.2. Case: 18-40286 Document: 00514765508 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/18/2018
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 47 (Friday, March 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 13137]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6019]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Notice of Wetlands Involvement for the Skyline Farm Project

AGENCY: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), Department of Energy 
(DOE).

ACTION: Notice of Wetlands Involvement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Today's notice announces BPA's proposal to transfer Skyline 
Farm's water rights from agricultural use to in-stream use for fish. 
Skyline Farm encompasses about 3640 hectares (9,000 acres) with 
approximately 50,000 acre-feet of water rights and is located in 
Malheur County, Oregon. In July 1994, BPA entered into a 1- to 3-year 
purchase option and water use agreement with the main owner of Skyline 
Farm. This agreement allows BPA to file application with the state to 
temporarily transfer use of 16,000 acre-feet of water per year from 
agricultural use to in-stream use for fish and hydropower generation 
and evaluate the effects. The purpose of this agreement is to carry out 
part of the Northwest Power Planning Council's program to increase 
stream flows in the upper Snake River Basin for salmon and steelhead. 
This proposal could impact wetlands that occur on the Skyline Farm 
property. In accordance with DOE regulations for compliance with 
floodplain and wetlands environmental review requirements (10 C.F.R. 
Part 1022), BPA will prepare a wetlands assessment and will perform 
this proposed action in a manner so as to avoid or minimize potential 
harm to or within the affected wetlands. The assessment will be 
included in the environmental assessment being prepared for the 
proposed project in accordance with the National Environmental Policy 
Act.

DATES: Comments are due to the address below no later than April 17, 
1995.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments to the Public Involvement and Information 
Manager, Bonneville Power Administration--CKP, P.O. Box 12999, 
Portland, Oregon 97212.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT: Nancy A. Wittpenn, Bonneville Power 
Administration--ECN-500, P.O. Box 3621, Portland, Oregon 97208-3621, 
phone number 503-230-3297, fax number 503-230-5699.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On the Skyline Farm property, palustrine 
emergent wetlands occur in drainages located in sections 2, 3, and 4 
within Township 18 South, Range 46 East, and in sections 1, 2, 10-17, 
20-23, 26-28, and 32-35 within Township 17 South, Range 46 East. 
Palustrine scrub-shrub wetlands associated with water impoundments 
within Jacobsen Gulch occur in sections 10, 14, and 16 within Township 
17 South, Range 46 East.
    Maps and further information are available from BPA at the address 
above.

    Issued in Portland, Oregon, on March 2, 1995.
John M. Taves,
NEPA Compliance Officer for Fish and Wildlife.
[FR Doc. 95-6019 Filed 3-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Cell Wall Biology and Utilization Research: Madison, WI
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Madison, Wisconsin U.S. Dairy Forage Research Center Cell Wall Biology and Utilization Research Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Research Projects Subjects of Investigation at this LocationEach ARS research project has related subjects of investigation.  Listed below are the subjects of investigation currently conducted at this location.
Clicking on a subject of investigation will list the research projects within that  subject of investigation.Subjects of Investigation
                            Alfalfa
                                Bacteria
                                Corn (for sweetcorn use 1480)
                                Dairy cattle, live animal
                                Forage legumes, other


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3323

ECM Industries LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_5-30-2019.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel