alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 54 (Tuesday, March 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 14929]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6860]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Olympic Provincial Interagency Executive Committee (PIEC), 
Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Olympic PIEC Advisory Committee will meet on April 10, 
1995 at the Olympic National Forest Headquarters Office, 1835 Black 
Lake Blvd., S.W. Olympia, Washington. The meeting will begin at 10 a.m. 
and continue until 4:00 p.m. Agenda items to be covered include: (1) 
Context of the Advisory Committee, including background on the 
President's Forest Plan; (2) introduction of members and orientation; 
(3) operating guidelines and ground rules; (4) mission and purpose of 
the Province Advisory Committee; (5) relationship between the Advisory 
Committee and the PIEC; (6) brief presentation by Advisory Committee 
members on who they represent and their interests; and (7) Open public 
forum. All Olympic Province Advisory Committee meetings are open to the 
public. Interested citizens are encouraged to attend.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Direct questions regarding this 
meeting to Kathy Snow, Province Liaison, USDA, Quilcene Ranger 
District, P.O. Box 280, Quilcene, WA 98376, (360) 765-2211 or Ronald R. 
Humphrey, Forest Supervisor, at (360) 956-2301.

    Dated: March 14, 1995.
David Yates,
Land Management Planning Staff Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-6860 Filed 3-20-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-3919

ECM Industries LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
#### In the Matter of Glenda Cartwright et al., Appellants, v Henry Rose, as Chairman of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Hempstead, et al., Respondents, and L.C.D. Building Corp., Intervenor-Respondent.

In a proceeding pursuant *452to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Hempstead, dated July 14, 1988, which, after a hearing, granted the application of L.C.D. Building Corp. for a width variance, the petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Morrison, J.), entered November 1, 1988, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

The Supreme Court properly dismissed the proceeding on the ground that it was not commenced within the 30 days prescribed by Town Law § 267 (7) *(see also, Matter of Ada’s Constr. Servs. v Scheyer,*128 AD2d 869). The fact that the petitioners had successfully moved by order to show cause dated September 6, 1988, to extend this time period, which is clearly a Statute of Limitations *(see, South Woodbury Taxpayers Assn. v Town of Oyster Bay,*79 AD2d 633), is of no avail, inasmuch as the court was without the authority to grant that relief *(see,*CPLR 201; *Matter of Sengstacken v Zoning Bd. of Appeals,*87 AD2d 651).

In light of our determination, we do not address the propriety of the determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals granting the intervenor’s application for a width variance. Thompson, J. P., Kunzeman, Harwood and Miller, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4250 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4250

   To create a point of order against legislation making nondefense 
 discretionary appropriations that would increase the deficit during a 
                       period of high inflation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 May 18 (legislative day, May 17), 2022

  Mr. Scott of Florida introduced the following bill; which was read 
           twice and referred to the Committee on the Budget

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To create a point of order against legislation making nondefense 
 discretionary appropriations that would increase the deficit during a 
                       period of high inflation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. POINT OF ORDER IN THE SENATE AGAINST LEGISLATION MAKING 
              NONDEFENSE DISCRETIONARY APPROPRIATIONS THAT WOULD 
              INCREASE THE DEFICIT DURING A PERIOD OF HIGH INFLATION.

    (a) Point of Order.--It shall not be in order in the Senate to 
consider any bill, joint resolution, motion, amendment, amendment 
between the Houses, or conference report making appropriations for the 
revised nonsecurity category (as defined in section 250(c) of the 
Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 
900(c))) that, if enacted, would increase the deficit over the period 
of current fiscal year, the budget year, and the ensuing 9 fiscal years 
following the budget year if the annualized change in the most recently 
monthly report on the Consumer Price Index for All-Urban Consumers 
published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the Department of Labor 
is not less than 8 percent.
    (b) Waiver and Appeal.--Subsection (a) may be waived or suspended 
in the Senate only by an affirmative vote of two-thirds of the Members, 
duly chosen and sworn. An affirmative vote of two-thirds of the Members 
of the Senate, duly chosen and sworn, shall be required to sustain an 
appeal of the ruling of the Chair on a point of order raised under 
subsection (a).
    (c) Effective Date.--This section shall apply on and after July 1, 
2022.
                                 <all>
```
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

January 4, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132353 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 132353 

 COA: 268884 

Saginaw CC: 01-020417-FH 

ERNEST HUMPHREY, JR., 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 28, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

p1218 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 4, 2007 

 Clerk
Exhibit 23.1  Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  We consent to the incorporation
by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No.s 33-45092,
33-47604, 33-85512, 333-2894, 333-2896, 333-51577, 333-82965, 333-39124, 333-61660,
333-108050, 333-115187, 333-121496, 333-126513, 333-134528, 333-145202 and
333-151503) and Form S-3 (No.s 33-83602, 333-2898, 333-14143, 333-15295,
333-58831, 333-59639, 333-87033, 333-33340, 333-61144, 333-75066, 333-101278,
333-108008, 333-111086, 333-115509, 333-127949, 333-127950, 333-132730,
333-136860, and 333-145200), of our reports dated February 23, 2009, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Amylin
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting of Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. included in this
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2008.   /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLPSan Diego, CaliforniaFebruary  23, 2009
Order filed September 17, 2015

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 15

- 00709

- CV

____________ IN THE MATTER OF A.F

. , Appellant

On Appeal from the 314th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2014

- 03135J



### O R D E R

This is an appeal from a judgment signed May 6, 2015. The notice of appeal was due August 4, 2015. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. Appellant, however, filed his notice of appeal on August 19, 2015, a date within 15 days of the due date for the notice of appeal. A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when the perfecting instrument is filed within 15 days of its due date. Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Appella nt did not file a motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal. While an extension may be implied, appellant is still obligated to come forward with a reasonable explanation to support the late filing.See Miller v. Greenpark Surgery Center Assocs., Ltd. , 974 S.W.2d 805, 808 (Tex.

App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, no pet.). Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to file a proper motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal on or before 10 days after the date of this order. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3;10.5 (b). If appellant does not comply with this order, we will dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

PER CURIAM
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4354 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4354

 To amend title 10, United States Code, regarding restrictions on the 
 use of funds and facilities of the Department of Defense for abortion 
                                 care.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 7, 2022

  Mrs. Gillibrand (for herself, Mrs. Shaheen, Mr. Blumenthal, and Ms. 
    Hirono) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 10, United States Code, regarding restrictions on the 
 use of funds and facilities of the Department of Defense for abortion 
                                 care.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Military Access to Reproductive Care 
and Health for Military Servicemembers Act'' or the ``MARCH for 
Military Servicemembers Act''.

SEC. 2. RESTORATION OF PREVIOUS POLICY REGARDING RESTRICTION ON USE OF 
              MEDICAL FACILITIES AND FUNDS OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FOR 
              ABORTION CARE.

    (a) Repeal.--Section 1093 of title 10, United States Code, is 
repealed.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 55 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to 
section 1093.
                                 <all>
```
Order entered November 2 4 , 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 21
- 00411
- CV
TONYA PARKS , Appellant

V. AFFILIATED BANK, ET. AL., A ppellee s On Appeal from the Coun ty Court at Law No. 2

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC
- 19
- 01614
- B

O RDER By letter filed November 1 9 , 2021, appellant informs the Court the reporter’s record filed November 15 is incomplete. Specifically, it does not include the record of th e June 5, 2020 hearing on appellees’ plea to the jurisdiction

or the record of th e May 15, 2021 hearing on appellant’s moti o n for new trial and motion to vacate

. We construe appellant’s letter as a motion to supplement the reporter’s
record. We GRANT the motion and ORDER Robin N. Washington, OfficialCourt Reporter for County Court at Law No. 2, to file the record of the June 2020

and May 2021 hearings no later than December 13, 2021. Because the record was first due July 6, 2021, we caution Ms. Washingt on that any extension requests will not be granted absent exigent circumstances.
We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. Washington and the parties.
/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 11

              CAMBRIDGE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS (MASSACHUSETTS), INC.
            STATEMENTS REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                     (in thousands, except per share data)

                                                  Years Ended December 31,
                                           ------------------------------------
                                             1999          1998          1997
                                           --------      --------      --------
Net income                                 $  2,119      $ 51,940      $ 33,782
                                           ========      ========      ========
Basic:
     Weighted average number of common
         shares outstanding                  60,004        58,079        54,632
                                           ========      ========      ========
     Net income per common share           $    .04      $    .90      $    .62
                                           ========      ========      ========

Diluted:
     Weighted average number of common
         shares outstanding                  60,004        58,079        54,632
     Dilutive effects of stock options,
         restricted stock, and warrants       1,741         5,222         6,143
                                           --------      --------      --------
     Weighted average common and common
         equivalent shares outstanding       61,745        63,301        60,775
                                           ========      ========      ========
     Net income per common and common
         equivalent share                  $    .03      $    .83      $    .55
                                           ========      ========      ========
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3218

CW Bearing USA, Inc:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 57 (Friday, March 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15556]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7248]



[[Page 15556]]

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

[Project No. 2689-005]


Notice of Application

March 20, 1995.
    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been 
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection:

a. Type of application: Transfer of License and Approval of Lease.
b. Project No.: 2689-005.
c. Date Filed: March 7, 1995.
d. Applicant: Scott Paper Company.
e. Name of Project: Oconto Falls.
f. Location: Oconto River, Oconto County, Wisconsin.
g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791(a)-825(r).
h. Applicant Contact: Nancy J. Skancke, Grammer, Kissel, Robbins & 
Skancke, 1225 Eye Street NW., Suite 1225, Washington, DC 20005, 
(202) 408-5400.
i. FERC Contact: Mark Hooper, (202) 219-2680.
j. Comment Date: April 6, 1995.
k. Description of Transfer and Lease: Scott Paper Company (Scott) 
proposes to transfer to N.E.W. Hydro, Inc. (N.E.W.) its license. 
N.E.W. requests approval of the lease arrangement between N.E.W. and 
Scott.

    1. This notice also consists of the following standard 
paragraphs: B, C1, and D2.
    B. Comments, Protests, or Motions to Intervene--Anyone may 
submit comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene in accordance 
with the requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 
385.210, .211, .214. In determining the appropriate action to take, 
the Commission will consider all protests or other comments filed, 
but only those who file a motion to intervene in accordance with the 
Commission's Rules may become a party to the proceeding. Any 
comments, protests, or motions to intervene must be received on or 
before the specified comment date for the particular application.
    C1. Filing and Service of Responsive Documents--Any filings must 
bear in all capital letters the title ``COMMENTS'', 
``RECOMMENDATIONS FOR TERMS AND CONDITIONS'', ``PROTEST'', OR 
``MOTION TO INTERVENE'', as applicable, and the Project Number of 
the particular application to which the filing refers. Any of the 
above-named documents must be filed by providing the original and 
the number of copies provided by the Commission's regulations to: 
The Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North 
Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426. A copy of any motion 
to intervene must also be served upon each representative of the 
Applicant specified in the particular application.
    D2. Agency Comments--Federal, state, and local agencies are 
invited to file comments on the described application. A copy of the 
application may be obtained by agencies directly from the Applicant. 
If an agency does not file comments within the time specified for 
filing comments, it will be presumed to have no comments. One copy 
of an agency's comment must also be sent to the applicant's 
representatives.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-7248 Filed 3-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 53 (Monday, March 20, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 14747]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6700]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Project No. 8835-019 California]


Dewey B. Smith; Notice of Availability of Environmental 
Assessment

March 14, 1995.
    An environmental assessment (EA) is available for public review. 
The EA is for the termination of the license of the Dewey Smith 
Hydroelectric Project. The EA finds that termination of the license 
would not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the 
quality of the human environment. The Dewey Smith Project is located on 
the Shasta River in Siskiyou County, California.
    The EA was prepared by staff in the Office of Hydropower Licensing, 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Copies of the EA can be viewed at 
the Commission's Reference and Information Center, Room 3308, 941 North 
Capitol Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. Copies can also be obtained 
by calling the project manager listed below.
    Please submit any comments within 45 days from the date of this 
notice. Any comments, conclusions, or recommendations that draw upon 
studies, reports or other working papers of substance should be 
supported by appropriate documentation.
    Comments should be addressed to Lois D. Cashell, Secretary, Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426. Please denote ``Comments: Project No. 8835-019'' 
on all comments. For more information, please contact the project 
manager, John Mudre, at (202) 219-1208.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-6700 Filed 3-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 54 (Tuesday, March 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 14930]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6881]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Open Meeting of Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary Advisory 
Council

AGENCY: Sanctuaries and Reserves Division (SRD), Office of Ocean and 
Coastal Resource Management (OCRM), National Ocean Service (NOS), 
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Department of 
Commerce.

ACTION: Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary Advisory Council open 
meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Advisory Council was established in December 1993 to 
advise NOAA's Sanctuaries and Reserves Division regarding the 
management of the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary.

TIME AND PLACE: Friday, March 24, 1995, from 8:30 until 5:00. The 
meeting will be held at the Santa Cruz Holiday Inn, Sierra Room, 611 
Ocean Street, Santa Cruz, California.

AGENDA: General issues related to the Monterey Bay National Marine 
Sanctuary are expected to be discussed, including strategic planning 
for the Council, update on plans to reduce elephant seal harassment at 
Piedras Blancas, update from the Sanctuary Manager, and reports from 
the working groups.

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: The meeting will be open to the public. Seats 
will be available on a first-come, first-served basis.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Scott Kathey at (408) 647-4201 or Elizabeth Moore at (301) 713-3141.

Federal Domestic Assistance Catalog Number 11.429 Marine Sanctuary 
Program

    Dated: March 16, 1995.
W. Stanley Wilson,
Assistant Administrator for Ocean Services and Coastal Zone Management.
[FR Doc. 95-6881 Filed 3-20-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-08-M