alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(June 11, 1990)

#### Robert Becker et al., Appellants, v City of New York et *489al., Respondents.

In an action, *inter alia,*to recover damages for assault, false arrest, false imprisonment, and malicious prosecution, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Duberstein, J.), entered January 26, 1989, which denied their motion for the disclosure of records of the Internal Affairs Division of the New York City Police Department and granted a cross motion of the City of New York for a protective order.

Ordered that the order is reversed, with one bill of costs payable by the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs, the motion is granted, the cross motion is denied, and the City of New York is directed to produce the personnel records of the defendant police officers Harry Antoine and Alfred Johnson for in camera inspection by the Supreme Court, Kings County, within 30 days after service upon the City of New York of a copy of this decision and order, with notice of entry.

The plaintiffs Robert and Philip Becker claim that they were physically assaulted and wrongfully arrested in an altercation with New York City police officers following a traffic incident. The plaintiffs seek disclosure of the report of the New York City Police Department Internal Affairs Division (hereinafter IAD) relating to the incident. The Supreme Court denied the plaintiffs’ motion seeking disclosure and granted the cross motion of the City of New York for a protective order. The court held that a report, which is part of the police officers’ personnel records, is "cloaked with the mantle of confidentiality” under Civil Rights Law § 50-a, that disclosure is also precluded by the public interest privilege for confidential government communication, and that the plaintiffs failed to make the requisite factual showing to warrant an in camera examination of the materials.

We disagree. The plaintiffs were merely required to offer, in good faith, "some factual predicate” for providing access to the IAD records so as to warrant an in camera review *(People v Gissendanner,*48 NY2d 543, 550; Civil Rights Law § 50-a [2]; *Taran v State of New York,*140 AD2d 429, 432). This threshold requirement of Civil Rights Law § 50-a (2) is designed to eliminate fishing expeditions of police officers’ personnel files for collateral materials to be used for impeachment purposes *(see, Matter of Capital Newspapers Div. v Burns,*67 NY2d 562, 568-569). The plaintiffs have made the required factual showing that specific materials in the officers’ files relate to the incident in question *(see, Lawrence v City of New York,*118 AD2d *490758, 759; *Cox v New York City Hous. Auth.,*105 AD2d 663, 664; *People v Morales,*97 Misc 2d 733, 740).

In addition, we reject as without merit the defendants’ claim that the IAD report is protected by the public interest privilege for confidential government communications *(see, Cirale v 80 Pine St. Corp.,*35 NY2d 113; *People v Keating,*286 App Div 150, 153). Bracken, J. P., Eiber, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Dennis Allen WRAY, Appellant.

No. WD 49393.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Jan. 31, 1995.

Jerome Y. Biggs, Jr., Savannah, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Joanne E. Beal, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before FENNER, C.J., P.J., and KENNEDY and BERREY, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from jury conviction of possession of over 35 grams of marijuana and subsequently imposed six year sentence.

Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3785 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to eliminate the restriction on veterans concurrently serving in the Offices of Administrator and Deputy 

Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 8 (legislative day, MARCH 7), 2022 

Mr. WICKER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to eliminate the 

restriction on veterans concurrently serving in the Offices 

of Administrator and Deputy Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3785 IS

1 SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF RESTRICTION ON VETERANS 

2 CONCURRENTLY SERVING IN THE OFFICES 

3 OF ADMINISTRATOR AND DEPUTY ADMINIS4 TRATOR OF THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMIN5 ISTRATION. 

6 Section 106(d)(1) of title 49, United States Code, is 

7 amended by striking ‘‘, a retired regular officer of an 

8 armed force, or a former regular officer of an armed 

9 force’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANICIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF EASTERN AMERICAN NATURAL GAS TRUST AS OF AND
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,522
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,162,576
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,164,098
<PP&E>                                      93,162,180
<DEPRECIATION>                              40,074,901
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              55,251,901
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,164,098
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  53,087,803
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                55,251,901
<SALES>                                      9,678,628
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,678,628
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,153,191
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               472,917
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (6,030)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              8,561,984
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          8,561,984
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 8,561,984
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.45


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BEYOND.COM CORPORATION FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          18,460
<SECURITIES>                                    31,685
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,507
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (977)
<INVENTORY>                                        730
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                64,510
<PP&E>                                          16,560
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,836)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 173,704
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,062
<BONDS>                                         63,250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       296,924
<OTHER-SE>                                   (213,532)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   173,704
<SALES>                                         31,339
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,339
<CGS>                                           27,162
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (395)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (45,783)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (45,783)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (45,783)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (1.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4324 

To clarify that convictions for kidnapping or sexual abuse are grounds for 

inadmissibility and deportability under the Immigration and Nationality Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 26, 2022 

Mr. THUNE (for himself, Mr. CASSIDY, Mr. MORAN, Mr. TILLIS, and Mr. 

LANKFORD) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To clarify that convictions for kidnapping or sexual abuse 

are grounds for inadmissibility and deportability under 

the Immigration and Nationality Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reverse Entry for Mi5 grant Offenders and Violence Expulsion Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. GROUNDS FOR INADMISSIBILITY. 

7 Section 212(a)(2)(F) of the Immigration and Nation8 ality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(2)(F)) is amended to read as 

9 follows: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4324 IS

1 ‘‘(F) KIDNAPPING; SEXUAL ABUSE.—Any 

2 alien who has been convicted of— 

3 ‘‘(i) any offense under chapter 55 of 

4 title 18, United States Code (related to 

5 kidnapping); or 

6 ‘‘(ii) any offense under chapter 109A 

7 of such title (related to sexual abuse), 

8 is inadmissible.’’. 

9 SEC. 3. GROUNDS FOR DEPORTATION. 

10 Section 237(a)(2)(D)(i) of the Immigration and Na11 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1227(a)(2)(D)(i)) is amended— 

12 (1) by inserting ‘‘chapter 55 (relating to kid13 napping),’’ after ‘‘espionage),’’; and 

14 (2) by inserting ‘‘chapter 109A (relating to sex15 ual abuse),’’ after ‘‘sabotage),’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE MSX
INTERNATIONAL, INC. FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED APRIL 2, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-02-2000
<CASH>                                           7,300
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  315,911
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      4,428
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               343,006
<PP&E>                                         102,684
<DEPRECIATION>                                (57,061)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 565,003
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          267,061
<BONDS>                                        268,637
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           36,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                    (18,068)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   565,003
<SALES>                                        247,965
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               247,965
<CGS>                                          212,805
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  212,805
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                21,107
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,911
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,142
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,928
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,214
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,214
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4291 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4291

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the standard 
  charitable mileage rate for delivery of meals to elderly, disabled, 
                    frail, and at-risk individuals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 24, 2022

 Mr. King (for himself and Mr. Cornyn) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the standard 
  charitable mileage rate for delivery of meals to elderly, disabled, 
                    frail, and at-risk individuals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Delivering Elderly Lunches and 
Increasing Volunteer Engagement and Reimbursements Act of 2022'' or the 
``DELIVER Act of 2022''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN STANDARD MILEAGE RATE FOR DELIVERY OF MEALS TO 
              ELDERLY, DISABLED, FRAIL, AND AT-RISK INDIVIDUALS.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (i) of section 170 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following: 
``In the case of use of such an automobile for the delivery of meals to 
homebound individuals who are elderly, disabled, frail, or at risk, the 
mileage rate used shall be the standard business mileage rate specified 
by the Internal Revenue Service for the taxable year in which such 
miles are driven.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to miles driven on or after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1128

In Re: JAMES ALLEN IRBY, III,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. 

(8:03-cr-00490-DKC-1; 8:07-cv-01186-DKC)

Submitted: March 31, 2011 Decided: April 6, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Allen Irby, III, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

James Allen Irby, III, petitions for a writ of 

mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting 

on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2010) motion. He seeks an 

order from this court directing the district court to act. Our 

review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district 

court, on February 18, 2011, denied Irby’s § 2255 motion.

Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided

Irby’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant 

leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED
EXHIBIT 32.1



                                  EXHIBIT 32.1



                              Certification of CEO
                         pursuant to Section 906 of the
              Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 regarding Quarterly Report
              on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended January 31, 2006

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby
certify that:

         1. The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal period
ended January 31, 2006, (the Form 10Q-SB) fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and

         2. Information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Date:    March 21, 2006                 By:/s/ Joseph Kristul
         --------------                    -----------------------------------
                                           Joseph Kristul
                                           Chief Executive Officer




<PAGE>



                              Certification of CFO
                         pursuant to Section 906 of the
              Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 regarding Quarterly Report
              on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended January 31, 2006

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby
certify that:

         1. The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal period
ended January 31, 2006, (the Form 10Q-SB) fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and

         2. Information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Date:    March 21, 2006                 By:  /s/ Thomas Schott
         --------------                      ---------------------------------
                                             Thomas Schott
                                             Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 56 (Thursday, March 23, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15322]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7079]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Research, Engineering and Development Advisory Committee; 
Subcommittee on Human Factors

    Pursuant to section 10(A)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Public Law 92-362; 5 U.S.C. App. I), notice is hereby given of a 
meeting of the Subcommittee on Human Factors of the Federal Aviation 
Administration (FAA) Research, Engineering and Development (R,E&D) 
Advisory Committee to be held Thursday, April 6, 1995, 9 am to 5 pm and 
continuing on Friday, April 7, 1995, 9 am to 1 pm. The meeting will 
take place at the Capital Gallery Building, 600 Maryland Avenue, SW., 
Washington, DC, in suite 500.
    The agenda for this meeting will include discussion on 
certification and regulation as well as discussion on FAA research in 
human factors.
    Attendance is open to the interested public, but limited to space 
available. With the approval of the subcommittee chairman, members of 
the public may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing 
to present oral statements, obtain information, or attend the meeting 
should contact Dr. Mark Hofmann, AAR-100, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., 
Washington, DC, at (202) 267-7125, the FAA Designated Federal Official 
to the subcommittee.
    Members of the public may present a written statement to the 
subcommittee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on March 15, 1995.
Andres Zellweger,
Director, Office of Aviation Research.
[FR Doc. 95-7079 Filed 3-22-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
#### W. H. BUCHANAN v. CAROLINA STORES, Inc.

(Filed 13 May, 1931.)

Principal and Agent C I) — Evidence of actual or apparent authority of agent held sufficient.

Evidence in this action to recover the price of goods sold and delivered is held sufficient to show that the purchaser’s agent had actual or apparent authority to bind his principal in making the purchase.

Appeal by defendant from *St,afile, J.,*at July Term, 1930, of Aveby.

No error.

This is an action to recover the contract price of beef sold and delivered by plaintiff to defendant.

From judgment on the verdict that plaintiff recover of defendant the sum of $450.10, and the costs of the action, defendant appealed to the Supreme Court.

*J. W. Ragland for plaintiff.*

*Newland & Townsend p,nd Burke & Burke for defendant.*

Pee Cueiam.

There was evidence at the trial of this action tending to show that *W.*H. Tucker, who bought the beef from plaintiff, was at the time the general manager of defendant’s store at Elk Park, N. O.; that he bought the beef and issued checks and a due bill for the purchase price as such general manager, and that the beef was bought by the said *W.*H. Tucker to be sold by the defendant at retail in its stores. The evidence was sufficient to show that W. H. Tucker had actual or at least apparent authority as general manager of defendant’s store to buy the beef, and to pay for the same by the checks and due bill signed by him as general manager. *Bobbitt & Co. v. Land Co.,*191 N. C., 323, 131 S. E., 643.

There was no error in the refusal of the court to allow defendant’s motion for judgment as of nonsuit. The judgment is affirmed.

No error.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2646

Reelcraft Industries:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn