alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3247

BorgWarner, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
#### STATE v. EXUM HOOKS.

(Filed 31 December, 1926.)

Appeal by defendant from *Granmer, J.,*at August Term, 1926, of WayNe. No error.

*Attorney-General Brummitt and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.*

*J. Faison Thompson and Hugh Dortch for defendant.*

*833Pee Cueiam.

Tbe defendant was prosecuted for Laving liquor in bis possession for the purpose of sale and was convicted. We have examined the several assignments of error and find that under numerous decisions all the exceptions must be overruled.

No error.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Market
Hub Partners Storage, L.P. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                 0001060240
<NAME>                                MARKET HUB PARTNERS STORAGE, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                          1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                               10580
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         7397
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     23245
<PP&E>                                              346668
<DEPRECIATION>                                       26882
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      346469
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 4798
<BONDS>                                             115000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                          226671
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        346469
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     23859
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         4649
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      5439
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    7355
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       7243
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                          7243
<EPS-BASIC>                                              0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0<F1>

<FN>
Not meaningful since Market Hub Partners Storage, L.P. is a wholly-owned
subsidiary.
</FN>

</TABLE>
1

NUMBER 13-20-00010-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

CANDICE RENALLE CHAPA, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 36th District Court

of San Patricio County, Texas.

O R D E R

Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Tijerina

Order Per Curiam

Appellant, Candice Renalle Chapa, has filed a notice of appeal with this Court 

from her conviction in trial court cause number S-17-3438-CR. The trial court’s 

certification of the defendant’s right to appeal shows that the defendant does not have 

the right to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing that a 

defendant has a right of appeal is not made a part of the record. Id. R. 25.2(d); see id. 
2

R. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. The purpose of the certification requirement is to efficiently sort 

appealable cases from non-appealable cases so that appealable cases can “move 

through the system unhindered while eliminating, at an early stage, the time and 

expense associated with non-appealable cases.” Greenwell v. Ct. of Apps. for the 

Thirteenth Jud. Dist., 159 S.W.3d 645, 649 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see Hargesheimer 

v. State, 182 S.W.3d 906, 912 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).

Within thirty days of date of this notice, appellant’s lead appellate counsel, Larry 

Chris Iles, is hereby ORDERED to: 1) review the record; 2) determine whether appellant 

has a right to appeal; and 3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel’s findings as to 

whether appellant has a right to appeal and/or advise this Court as to the existence of 

any amended certification. If appellant’s counsel determines that appellant has a right 

to appeal, counsel is further ORDERED to file a motion with this Court within thirty days 

of this notice, identifying and explaining substantive reasons why appellant has a right 

to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 44.3, 44.4; Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 614–15 

(Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see also, e.g., Carroll v. State, 119 S.W.3d 838, 841 (Tex. 

App.—San Antonio 2003, no pet.) (certification form provided in appendix to appellate 

rules may be modified to reflect that defendant has right of appeal under circumstances 

not addressed by the form). The motion must include an analysis of the applicable case 

law, and any factual allegations therein must be true and supported by the record. See 

Dears, 154 S.W.3d at 614–15; cf. Woods v. State, 108 S.W.3d 314, 316 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 2003) (construing former appellate rule 25.2(b)(3) and holding that recitations in 

the notice of appeal must be true and supported by the record). Copies of record 

documents necessary to evaluate the alleged error in the certification affecting 
3

appellant’s right to appeal shall be attached to the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1,

10.2.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. 

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the 

14th day of February, 2020.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3192

Teradyne, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests. 

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
COMPONENT NUMBER

A32631

CUSTOMER NUMBER

172000990002

FINISHED GOOD NUMBER

4SW17844

RANK

JIG NUMBER

17

MANUFACTURING PLANT

STEC B

DESTINATION

CML

PART DESCRIPTION

CONVERTIBLE SWITCH (5C3 959 727_ICX)

AIR PRESSURE

0.4 - 0.6 MPa

30.

PACKING THE PARTS

PRESENT AND NO DAMAGE.

CONFIRM

MASTERS (START-UP/CHANGEOVER)

CUSTOMER

Honda

1. OK MASTER

2. N/G FUNCTION MASTER

11.

CONTROL ITEM

TEST MARK

DURING 5/10 PC INSPECTION IF REJECT IS FOUND ENTIRE SHIPMENT 

MUST BE 100% INSPECTED

TESTING THE PART

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

22.

15.

2. Press knob down 2X.

6.

9.

10.

7.

8.

1. Press Green Button to Start Test

5.

4.

3. Pull knob up 2X.

14.

SMALL LOTS

N/A N/A

QTY = 108 QTY = ?

CHANNEL NUMBER

11

ORIGINAL ALTERNATIVE #1

ILLUMINATION

Yes

SHAKE PART

Yes

Date Issued: 

PROBLEM NOTIFICATION

Part Number(s) Affected: Photo Here Problem:

PROBLEM NOTIFICATION

Part Number(s) Affected: Photo Here Problem:

Date Issued: 

PROBLEM NOTIFICATION

Part Number(s) Affected: Photo Here Problem:

Date Issued: 

CONTAINER

TOP - Left to Right

MIDDLE - Middle to Right

BOTTOM - Right to Left

Pack in secure/suitable cardboard container. 

(per T/L)

NEEDED PACKING MATERIAL: NEEDED PACKING MATERIAL:

SERVICE

CONTAINER

29.

12. 27.

13. 28.

ASSEMBLED CORRECTLY (VERIFY COLORS), NO 

DAMAGE OR DEFECTS. PRINT CORRECT AND 

LEGIBLE. NO CONTAMINATION. SCREWS 

PRESENT IF REQUIRED. BAR CODE CORRECT 

AND LEGIBLE IF PRESENT. NO BENT TERMINALS 

IF PRESENT.

PART CONDITION

Line box w/ plastic bag and 1 pc of PKG

4 layers of 27 pcs each

Parts are placed in a plastic tray

2 pcs of PKG between each layer and on top

25.

26.

23.

24.

LOT DATE PRESENT AND LEGIBLE

PART OPERATION MOVING PARTS (BUTTONS, KNOBS, LIDS, ETC.) 

OPERATE SMOOTHLY AND CORRECTLY

Top Middle Bottom

If shipping in 

cardboard box, 

Country of 

Origin MUST be 

on box
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2426

ASC Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3109

Reelcraft Industries:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4029 

To amend chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, to define ‘‘State 

of residence’’ and ‘‘resident’’, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 7, 2022 

Mr. ROUNDS (for himself, Mr. RISCH, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. MORAN, Mr. CRAMER, 

Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. BRAUN, Mr. CRUZ, Mr. MARSHALL, Mr. DAINES, Mr. 

THUNE, Mr. LANKFORD, Mr. BARRASSO, Mrs. HYDE-SMITH, Mr. 

HOEVEN, Ms. LUMMIS, Mr. COTTON, and Mr. INHOFE) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, to 

define ‘‘State of residence’’ and ‘‘resident’’, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Traveler’s Gun Rights 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. STATE OF RESIDENCE. 

7 (a) DEFINITIONS.—Section 921 of title 18, United 

8 States Code, is amended— 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4029 IS

1 (1) in subsection (a)— 

2 (A) by striking ‘‘(a)’’ before ‘‘As used’’; 

3 and 

4 (B) by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(36)(A) The term ‘State of residence’ means— 

6 ‘‘(i) the State in which an individual re7 sides; 

8 ‘‘(ii) in the case of an individual, or spouse 

9 of an individual, who is an active duty member 

10 of the Armed Forces— 

11 ‘‘(I) the State in which the permanent 

12 duty station of the member is located; and 

13 ‘‘(II) the State in which the member 

14 maintains a place of abode from which the 

15 member commutes each day to the perma16 nent duty station of the member; or 

17 ‘‘(iii) in the case of an individual who does 

18 not have a physical residence in any State, the 

19 State in which an individual maintains a private 

20 mailbox or post office box. 

21 ‘‘(B) For purposes of subparagraph (A)(i)— 

22 ‘‘(i) an individual resides in a State if the 

23 individual is present in the State with the inten24 tion of making a home in that State; and 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4029 IS

1 ‘‘(ii) an individual who maintains a home 

2 in more than 1 State is a resident of each such 

3 State during the time when the individual is 

4 present in that State. 

5 ‘‘(37) The term ‘resident’, with respect to a 

6 State, means an individual who satisfies clause (i), 

7 (ii), or (iii) of paragraph (36)(A) with respect to 

8 that State.’’; and 

9 (2) by striking subsection (b). 

10 (b) NATIONAL INSTANT CRIMINAL BACKGROUND

11 CHECK SYSTEM.—Section 922(t)(1)(C) of title 18, United 

12 States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘transferee con13 taining a photograph of the transferee.’’ and inserting the 

14 following: ‘‘transferee— 

15 ‘‘(i) containing a photograph of the trans16 feree; and 

17 ‘‘(ii) containing— 

18 ‘‘(I) the address of the residence of 

19 the transferee; or 

20 ‘‘(II) the address for a private mail21 box or post office box maintained by the 

22 transferee, if the transferee does not have 

23 a physical residence in any State.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

October 12, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-1912

HeathCo LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2135

Northern Tool & Equipment:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
Consent Letter of DeGolyer and MacNaughton



 Exhibit 10.5 
 DEGOLYER AND MACNAUGHTON 
 5001 SPRING VALLEY ROAD 

SUITE 800 EAST 
 DALLAS, TEXAS 75244 
 June 27, 2011 

Dr. Juan José Suárez Coppel 

Director General 
 Petróleos Mexicanos

 Avenida Marina Nacional No. 329 

Colonia Petróleos Mexicanos 
 Torre
Ejecutiva, Piso 41 
 11311 Mexico, D.F. Mexico 
 Dear Dr. Suárez Coppel; 
 We hereby consent to the reference to
DeGolyer and MacNaughton as set forth under the headings “Presentation of Information Concerning Reserves” and “Business Overview” under the subheadings “Overview by Business Segment,” “Exploration and
Production,” and “Reserves” in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Petróleos Mexicanos for the year ended December 31, 2010, and to the filing as an exhibit to the Form 20-F of our report entitled “Appraisal Report as
of January 1, 2011 on Reserves of Certain Properties operated by Pemex Exploración y Producción in the Región Marina Suroeste of Mexico.” These estimates were prepared in accordance with the reserves definitions of
Rules 4-10(a) (1)-(32) of Regulation S-X of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. 
  

	
	Very truly yours,
	
	/s/ DeGOLYER and MacNAUGHTON
	
	DeGOLYER and MacNAUGHTON
	Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-716
exv10w2







Exhibit 10.2




Cash and Equity Bonus Determinations under 2011 Compensation Program

(pending final audited financials)




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Name	 	Cash Bonus Earned ($)	 	Equity Bonus Earned (options)
	Steve Plochocki
	 	$	156,750	 	 	 	12,000	 
	Pat Cline
	 	$	628,571	 	 	 	45,000	 
	Paul Holt
	 	$	93,000	 	 	 	6,000	 
	Scott Decker
	 	$	105,000	 	 	 	9,000