U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 close



Research
                Research Home
                            National Programs
                            Research Projects
                            Scientific Manuscripts
                            International Engagement
                            Scientific Software/Models
                            Databases and Datasets
                            Office of Scientific Quality Review
            Media
                News & Features
                            Multimedia
                            Briefing Room
                            Down on the Farm
                            Press Room
                            Science in Your Shopping Cart
                            Scientific Discoveries
                            Tellus
                            Under the Microscope
            About ARS
                About ARS Home
                            Staff Directory
                            Labs and Research Centers (Map)
                            Headquarter Offices
                            Organizational Chart
                            Employee Services (REE Employees Only)
                            Office of Outreach, Diversity, and Equal Opportunity
            Work With Us
                Work With Us Home
                            ARS Vacancies at USAJOBS
                            Careers at ARS Information
                            Scientific Collaborations
                            Extramural Agreements
                            1890 Faculty Research Sabbatical ProgramSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Research Publications at this Location





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Title:   Author  item
                                            Owens, Lloyditem
                                            Malone, Robert

                                                         - *Rob*item
                                            STARR, G - THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITYitem
                                            LAL, R - THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY
  Submitted to: International Soil Conservation Organization (ISCO)
                                    Publication Type: Proceedings
                                    Publication Acceptance Date: 4/19/2001
                                    Publication  Date: N/A
                                    Citation: N/AInterpretive Summary: "Global warming" is a major environmental and political issue presently. Although there are controversies as to what extent or even whether global warming is occurring, it is generally accepted that atmospheric carbon dioxide levels are increasing.  Steps are being discussed on an international basis for the reduction of carbon dioxide emissions (e.g.  reduction of or cleaner burning of fossil fuels).  In conjunction with this, practices to capture and store (or sequester) carbon (C) are being studied.  One major potential area for C storage is agricultural crop production.  Conventional tillage, i.e. moldboard plowing, exposes a lot of soil organic matter to the air with large potential C losses.  Various conservation tillage practices store larger amounts of C in the soil than conventionally tilled soils.  Using small watersheds near Coshocton, Ohio, different conservation tillage practices were compared with regard to the C Ccontent on sediments leaving the watersheds and the total amount of C move on the sediments.  The purpose was to determine whether C losses on sediments could be reduced by the selection of a conservation tillage practice.  C contents on sediment were similar for no-till, chisel-plow, paraplow, and disk practices, ranging from 2 to 3% C.  Sediment losses differed, being greatest with disk.  Therefore, the best way to reduce C losses on sediments from a field is to select a practice that reduces sediment losses.  Such information will be useful not only to farmers and farm consultants but also to policy makers that make decisions concerning allowable procedures for C losses and storage.
                                Technical Abstract: With the current interest in CO2 emissions and their potential impacts on global climate change, it is important to evaluate the role of agriculture in the global carbon (C) budget.  Impacts of various tillage practices on C release/sequestration need to be assessed.  At a USDA-ARS research station near Coshocton, Ohio, various conservation tillage practices including  corn/soybean rotations with No-till (NT), Chisel-plow (CP), Paraplow (PP), and Disk (D) preceding the corn and soybean crops of a corn/soybean/ wheat-meadow rotation were studied on small watersheds (0.55 to 0.79 ha). Each watershed was instrumented with a 60-cm H-flume mounted on a concrete approach, and a Coshocton wheel for collecting a proportional sample of water and sediment.  Over a 13 year period, samples of sediment deposited in the flume approach and in runoff were collected.  These samples were analyzed for total C, and comparisons of soil C were made among management  practices.  Weighted averages of soil C in the sediment passing through th flumes did not differ significantly among tillage treatments, although NT was the highest (2.8%) and CP was the lowest (1.9%).  Weighted averages of soil C in the flume floor sediments were slightly lower with NT being the highest (2.3%) and PP being the lowest (2.1%).  For comparison, weighted soil C averages in sediment from small fertilized, pastured watersheds ranged from 5.2 to 7.2%.  Average annual sediment loss was 437, 656, and 753 kg/ha for NT, CP, and D, respectively.  Annual average transport of soil C (total sediment transported x C content) in the sediment was 11.8, 12.0, 10.9, and 17.6 kg/ha for NT, CP, PP, and D, respectively.  Although tillage practices may reduce C transport in sediment by lowering C content, a greater factor for reducing C movement is reducing sediment movement.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov