Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 53 / Monday, March 20, 1995 / Notices 14753

REFUND APPLICATIONS RECEIVED

Date received Name of refund proceeding/name of refund application Case No.

2/7/95 ...................................................... Air Comfort, Inc ..................................................................................................... RF321–21058

2/10/95 .................................................... Nash Equity Exchange .......................................................................................... RG272–25

[FR Doc. 95–6801 Filed 3–17–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P

Office of Hearings and Appeals

Notice of Cases Filed; Week of

February 13 Through February 17,

1995

During the week of February 13

through February 17, 1995, the appeals

and applications for exception or other

relief listed in the Appendix to this

Notice were filed with the Office of

Hearings and Appeals of the Department

of Energy. Submissions inadvertently

omitted from earlier lists have also been

included.

Under DOE procedural regulations, 10

CFR Part 205, any person who will be

aggrieved by the DOE action sought in

these cases may file written comments

on the application within ten days of

service of notice, as prescribed in the

procedural regulations. For purposes of

the regulations, the date of service of

notice is deemed to be the date of

publication of this Notice or the date of

receipt by an aggrieved person of actual

notice, whichever occurs first. All such

comments shall be filed with the Office

of Hearings and Appeals, Department of

Energy, Washington, DC 20585.

Dated: March 13, 1995.

George B. Breznay,

Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals.

LIST OF CASES RECEIVED BY THE OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS

[Week of February 13 through February 17, 1995]

Date Name and location of applicant Case No. Type of Submission

1/5/95 .............. Loiza Valley Shell Service, Hato Rey, Puerto Rico.RR315–12 Request for Modification/Rescission in the Shell Refund

Proceeding. If granted: The January 5, 1994 Dismissal

Letter (Case Number RF315–9332) issued to Loiza Valley Shell Service would be modified regarding the firm’s

application for refund submitted in the Shell refund proceeding.

2/13/95 ............ Shell/Briggs Transportation Company, Texaco/Briggs Transportation Company,

Earlington, Kentucky.

RR315–13 thru

RR321–175

Request for Modification/Recission in the Shell and Texaco Refund Proceedings. If granted: The January 11,

1995 Decision and Order Case Numbers RF315–10286

and RF321–21054 issued to Briggs Transportation

Company would be modified regarding the firm’s application for refund submitted in the Shell and Texaco Refund Proceedings.

2/15/95 ............ Big/Little Stores, Inc., Enterprise, Alabama . VEE–0005 Exception to the Reporting Requirements. If granted: Big/

Little Stores, Inc. would not be required to file form

EIA–728B Reseller’s/Retailer’s Monthly Petroleum

Product Sales Report.

2/15/95 ............ Robert S. Foote, Knoxville, TN .................... VFA–0024 Appeal of an Information Request Denial. If granted: The

January 23, 1995 Freedom of Information Request Denial issued by the Health and Environmental Research

in the Office of Energy Research would be rescinded,

and Robert S. Foote would receive access to certain

Department of Energy information.

2/16/95 ............ Nevada Operations Office, Las Vegas, Nevada.VSO–0022 Request for Hearing under 10 CFR Part 710. If granted:

An individual employed at Nevada Operations Office

would receive a hearing under 10 CFR Part 710.

2/16/95 ............ Oak Ridge Operations Office, Oak Ridge,

TN.

VSO–0021 Request for Hearing under 10 CFR Part 710. If granted:

An individual employed at Oak Ridge Operations Office

would receive a hearing under 10 CFR Part 710.

REFUND APPLICATIONS RECEIVED

Date received Name of refund proceeding/name of refund application Case No.

2/13/95 .................................................... Cairo Elevator ....................................................................................................... RF272–26.

2/16/95 .................................................... Centex, Inc ............................................................................................................ RF345–35.

[FR Doc. 95–6802 Filed 3–17–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P

Notice of Issuance of Proposed

Decision and Order; Week of January

16 Through January 20, 1995

During the week of January 16

through January 20, 1995, the proposed

decision and order summarized below

was issued by the Office of Hearings and

Appeals of the Department of Energy

with regard to an application for

exception.

Under the procedural regulations that

apply to exception proceedings (10 CFR

Part 205, Subpart D), any person who
14754 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 53 / Monday, March 20, 1995 / Notices

will be aggrieved by the issuance of a

proposed decision and order in final

form may file a written notice of

objection within ten days of service. For

purposes of the procedural regulations,

the date of service of notice is deemed

to be the date of publication of this

Notice or the date an aggrieved person

receives actual notice, whichever occurs

first.

The procedural regulations provide

that an aggrieved party who fails to file

a Notice of Objection within the time

period specified in the regulations will

be deemed to consent to the issuance of

the proposed decision and order in final

form. An aggrieved party who wishes to

contest a determination made in a

proposed decision and order must also

file a detailed statement of objections

within 30 days of the date of service of

the proposed decision and order. In the

statement of objections, the aggrieved

party must specify each issue of fact or

law that it intends to contest in any

further proceeding involving the

exception matter.

Copies of the full text of this proposed

decision and order are available in the

Public Reference Room of the Office of

Hearings and Appeals, Room 1E–234,

Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence

Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585,

Monday through Friday, between the

hours of 1:00 p.m. and 5:00 p.m., except

federal holidays.

Dated: March 13, 1995.

George B. Breznay,

Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals.

Sound Oil Company, Seattle, WA,

Reportinfg Requirements—Lee–

0153

Sound Oil Company (Sound) filed an

Application for Exception from the

provision of filing Form EIA–782B,

entitled ‘‘Resellers’/Retailers’ Monthly

Petroleum Product Sales Report.’’ The

Exception request, if granted, would

permit Sound to be exempted from

filing Form EIA–782B. On January 19,

1995, the Department of Energy issued

a Proposed Decision and Order which

determined that the Exception request

be denied.

[FR Doc. 95–6803 Filed 3–17–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P

Office of Hearings and Appeals

Notice of Issuance of Proposed

Decisions and Orders; Week of

January 9 Through January 13, 1995

During the week of January 9 through

January 13, 1995, the proposed

decisions and orders summarized below

were issued by the Office of Hearings

and Appeals of the Department of

Energy with regard to applications for

exception.

Under the procedural regulations that

apply to exception proceedings (10 CFR

Part 205, Subpart D), any person who

will be aggrieved by the issuance of a

proposed decision and order in final

form may file a written notice of

objection within ten days of service. For

purposes of the procedural regulations,

the date of service of notice is deemed

to be the date of publication of this

Notice or the date an aggrieved person

receives actual notice, whichever occurs

first.

The procedural regulations provide

that an aggrieved party who fails to file

a Notice of Objection within the time

period specified in the regulations will

be deemed to consent to the issuance of

the proposed decision and order in final

form. An aggrieved party who wishes to

contest a determination made in a

proposed decision and order must also

file a detailed statement of objections

within 30 days of the date of service of

the proposed decision and order. In the

statement of objections, the aggrieved

party must specify each issue of fact or

law that it intends to contest in any

further proceeding involving the

exception matter.

Copies of the full text of these

proposed decisions and orders are

available in the Public Reference Room

of the Office of Hearings and Appeals,

Room 1E–234, Forrestal Building, 1000

Independence Avenue, SW.,

Washington, DC 20585, Monday

through Friday, between the hours of

1:00 p.m. and 5:00 p.m., except federal

holidays.

Dated: March 13, 1995,

George B. Breznay,

Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals.

Central American Petroleum Company

Cameron, MI, Reporting

Requirements VEE—0001

Central American Petroleum

Company (Central) filed an Application

for Exception from the provision of

filing Form EIA–782B, entitled

‘‘Resellers’/Retailers’ Monthly

Petroleum Product Sales Report.’’ The

Exception request, if granted, would

permit Central to be exempted from

filing Form EIA–782B. On January 12,

1995, the Department of Energy issued

a Proposed Decision and order which

determined that the Exception request

be denied.

Lane’s Service, Inc., Lavina, MT,

Reporting Requirements—LEE–0158

Lane’s Service, Inc. (Lane) filed an

Application for Exception from the

provision of filing Form EIA–782B,

entitled ‘‘Resellers’/Retailers’ Monthly

Petroleum Product Sales Report.’’ The

Exception request, if granted, would

permit Lane to be exempted from filing

Form EIA–782B. On January 12, 1995,

the Department of Energy issued a

Proposed Decision and Order which

determined that the Exception request

be denied.

[FR Doc. 95–6804 Filed 3–17–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P

Western Area Power Administration

Central Valley Project, Proposed NonFederal Funding to Perform

Rewindings With Uprates on Three

Generators at the Shasta Dam

Powerplant

AGENCY: Western Area Power

Administration, DOE.

ACTION: Notice of intent to enter into a

contract, along with the Department of

the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation

(Reclamation), to obtain non-Federal

funding from Central Valley Project

power contractors for maintenance and

replacement work, to be performed by

Reclamation, on the generators at Shasta

Dam Powerplant.

SUMMARY: The Western Area Power

Administration (Western) provides

notice that non-Federal funding will be

obtained for Reclamation to perform

rewindings with uprates on three

generators at the Shasta Dam

Powerplant in order to ensure system

reliability. Several Central Valley

Project (CVP) power contractors have

voluntarily agreed to jointly provide

financing to complete the proposed

work. All CVP power contractors will be

considered if they meet the conditions

specified under ‘‘Selection Criteria’’

herein. A list of the CVP power

contractors providing funding (Funding

Entities) may be requested from Western

at the address or telephone provided

under ‘‘For Further Information

Contact’’ herein.

This notice presents background

project information and outlines the

terms of the proposed financing

agreement and the projected work.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 19, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.

Zola M. Jackson, Assistant Area

Manager for Power Marketing,

Sacramento Area Office, Western Area

Power Administration, 1825 Bell Street,

Suite 105, Sacramento, CA 95825, (916)

649–4421.