alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | Exhibit 32.2 |
|--------|--------------|

RULE 13(a)-14(b) CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Brandywine Operating Partnership, L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the three-month period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christopher P. Marr , Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Brandywine Realty Trust, the Partnership’s sole general partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

| 1.     |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                   |   |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                    |   |
| 2.     |   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership. |   |

/s/        Christopher P. Marr                    Christopher P. MarrSenior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate: May 11, 2005              

*  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Brandywine Realty Trust and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  

 

----
#### Westcom Corporation, Respondent, v Dedicated Private Connections, LLC, et al., Appellants.

[775 NYS2d 1]

*121Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered May 27, 2003, which, after a nonjury trial, directed the corporate defendant to, inter alia, discontinue its business, adjudged defendant Feldman in breach of her fiduciary duty and awarded plaintiff $68,814.15 as a result of said breach, enjoined defendants Feldman, Lopez and Isaac from working for a competitor of plaintiff for 18 months, similarly enjoined defendant Palmieri for 12 months, and referred the amount of plaintiffs attorneys’ fees for a hearing, unanimously modified, on the law, to delete the reference, and otherwise affirmed, with one bill of costs to plaintiff payable by defendants-appellants.

The trial court’s determinations, that defendants’ services to plaintiff while in plaintiffs employ were of a special character and that information appropriated by defendants was confidential, were based on a fair interpretation of the evidence *(see Thoreson v Penthouse Intl.,*80 NY2d 490, 495 [1992]), which included not only testimony supportive of the court’s findings but also the stipulations in the governing agreements in which defendants acknowledged the special nature of their services and the confidentiality of the information at issue. The restrictions, which have already terminated as to two of the defendants, were reasonable under the circumstances *(see BDO Seidman v Hirshberg,*93 NY2d 382, 388-389 [1999]); they were reasonably designed for plaintiff’s protection in light of defendants’ establishment of a competing business, and the evidence of their egregious breach of trust and confidence in physically taking plaintiffs materials *(cf. Ruesch Intl. v MacCormack,*222 AD2d 343 [1995]). Feldman’s disgorgement of compensation was appropriate in view of her incorporation, financing and acquisition of equipment for a business to compete with that of plaintiff while still in plaintiffs employ *(see CBS Corp. v Dumsday,*268 AD2d 350, 353 [2000]; *Bon Temps Agency v Greenfield,*212 AD2d 427, 428 [1995]).

In the absence of a contractual provision authorizing the award of attorneys’ fees, the reference was inappropriate, and we modify accordingly.

We have considered defendants’ remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Saxe, Lerner and Marlow, JJ. *[See*9 AD3d —, July 29, 2004.]
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Dwain Hewitt v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-22-00727-CR & 01-22-00728-CR

Trial court case number: 1681498 & 1763161

Trial court: 351st District Court of Harris County

On January 12, 2023, Mark Hochglaube filed a motion to substitute as counsel, 

informing this Court that the trial court had granted Scott Christopher Pope’s motion to 

withdraw and had appointed Mark Hochglaube as appellant’s counsel. Accordingly, we 

grant the motion to substitute. The Clerk of the Court is directed to note on the docket of 

this Court that Scott Christopher Pope has withdrawn from representing appellant and 

Mark Hochblaube is appellant’s lead counsel. 

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: _____/s/ Terry Adams_______

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ____January 19, 2023_____
Exhibit 12(a).2

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the annualreport on Form 20-F of M-Systems Flash Disk Pioneers Limited (the "Company")for the period ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, DovMoran, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of his knowledge andbelief: 

 

(1)  the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2)  the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

By: /s/ DovMoran   

Dov Moran,

President andChief Executive Officer

M-Systems FlashDisk Pioneers Ltd. 

Dated June 30th, 2003 

  

 

____(1)____
**Exhibit
10.7**
 **OPTION
AGREEMENT**
 
 
 This
Option Agreement evidences the grant of a stock option (the "Option") to
purchase shares of common stock, par value $.001 (the "Company Stock"), of
Generex Biotechnology Corporation (the "Company") granted to **Brian
McGee** (the
"Optionee") pursuant to the Generex Biotechnology Corporation 2001 Stock Option
Plan (the “Plan”), a copy of which is attached to this Option Agreement and
incorporated into this Option Agreement by reference. The Option is subject to
the terms, conditions, limitations and restrictions set forth in the Plan,
including the following:
 
 a.  The date
of grant of the Option is **April
5, 2005** and the
number of shares of Company Stock that may be purchased upon exercise of the
Option is **35,714
(Thirty Five Thousand Seven Hundred Fourteen )** .
 
 b.  The
purchase price (the “Exercise Price”) of Company Stock subject to the Option is
 **$0.001** per
share.
 
 c.  The
Option is fully vested upon issuance.
 
 d.  Unless
sooner terminated pursuant to the Plan, the Option shall terminate on **April
4, 2010.** Option
will survive the termination of the Optionee’s employment.
 
 e.  The
Optionee shall pay the Exercise Price for the Option (i) in cash or (ii) by such
other method as may be approved by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s
Board of Directors. The Optionee shall pay the amount of any withholding tax due
at the time of exercise, as provided in the Plan.
 
 f.  The
rights and interests of the Optionee under this Option Agreement may not be
sold, assigned, encumbered or otherwise transferred, except, in the event of the
death of the Optionee, by will or by the laws of descent and
distribution.
 
 g.  Any
notice to the Company, including notice of exercise of an Option, shall be
addressed to the Company in care of Slava Jarnitskii at the Company’s principal
offices.
 
 IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, this Option Agreement has been executed on behalf of the
Company by a duly authorized officer and by the Optionee effective as of the
date of grant of the Option.


GENEREX BIOTECHNOLOGY
      CORPORATION
    
    
    ACCEPTED AND AGREED:By:
    /s/ Rose C. Perri
    
    
    /s/
      Brian McGeeROSE C. PERRI
    
    
    Brian
McGee
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 11.1

                            PAYLESS SHOESOURCE, INC.
                      COMPUTATION OF NET EARNINGS PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   May 4,           May 5,
(Thousands, except per share)                       2002             2001
                                                  --------         --------
<S>                                               <C>              <C>

Basic Computation:
------------------

Net earnings                                      $ 23,933         $ 29,650
Weighted average common
 shares outstanding                                 22,414           22,164
                                                  --------         --------


Basic earnings per share                          $   1.07         $   1.34
                                                  ========         ========


Diluted Computation:
--------------------

Net earnings                                      $ 23,933         $ 29,650

Weighted average common
 shares outstanding                                 22,414           22,164

Net effect of dilutive stock
  options based on the treasury
  stock method                                         378              631
                                                  --------         --------

Outstanding shares for diluted
  earnings per share                                22,792           22,795
                                                  ========         ========


Diluted earnings per share                        $   1.05         $   1.30
                                                  ========         ========
</TABLE>


Note: Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing net earnings by the
weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period.
Diluted earnings per share include the effect of conversions of options.
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. §1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Allegro Biodiesel Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
W. Bruce Comer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








/s/
      W. Bruce Comer III
              W. Bruce Comer
      III
              Chief
      Executive Officer
              (Principal
      Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting
      Officer)
              March
      30, 2009
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 7, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 12591]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5649]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT CORPORATION


Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Friday, March 17, 1995.

PLACE: Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation, 1325 G Street, N.W., 
Suite 800, Board Room, Washington, D.C. 20005.

STATUS: Open.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jeffrey T. Bryson, General 
Counsel/Secretary, 202/376-2441.

AGENDA:

I. Call to Order
II. Approval of Minutes:
    December 16, 1994
III. Audit Committee Report:
    February 22, 1995, Meeting
    a. Receive FY 1994 Audit Report from Outside Auditors
    b. Selection of Outside Auditors
    c. Proposed Revisions to the Corporate Investment Policy
IV. Budget Committee Report:
    February 23, 1995, Meeting
    a. Proposed FY 1995 Budget Revisions
V. Treasurer's Report
VI. Executive Director's Quarterly Management Report
VII. Adjourn
Jeffrey T. Bryson,
General Counsel/Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-5649 Filed 3-3-95; 12:38 pm]
BILLING CODE 7570-01-M
Exhibit 31.4

CERTIFICATION

I, Eric Dupont,
certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A, Amendment No. 1 of PowerSecure International, Inc.; and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |  |  |                                                     
|------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 7, 2016 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ ERIC DUPONT                                     
|                    |  |  |  |  |  | Eric Dupont                                         
|                    |  |  |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 13, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3595

Omega Environmental Technologies, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
S. 3825 

One Hundred Seventeenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty two 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 3903 Melear 

Drive in Arlington, Texas, as the ‘‘Ron Wright Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. RON WRIGHT POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 3903 Melear Drive in Arlington, Texas, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘Ron Wright Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Ron Wright Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 58 (Monday, March 27, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15804]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7432]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50-423]


Northeast Nuclear Energy Co.; Issuance of Amendment to Facility 
Operating License

    The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Commission) has issued 
Amendment No. 106 to Facility Operating License No. NPF-49 issued to 
Northeast Nuclear Energy Company (the licensee), which revised the 
Technical Specifications (TS) for operation of the Millstone Nuclear 
Power Station, Unit No. 3 located in New London County, Connecticut. 
The amendment is effective as of the date of issuance.
    The amendment relaxes the setpoint tolerance for the pressurizer 
safety valves and the main steam safety valves from <plus-minus> 
<plus-minus>1% to <plus-minus> <plus-minus>3%.
    The application for the amendment complies with the standards and 
requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), 
and the Commission's rules and regulations. The Commission has made 
appropriate findings as required by the Act and the Commission's rules 
and regulations in 10 CFR Ch. I, which are set forth in the license 
amendment.
    Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendment and Opportunity 
for Hearing in connection with this action was published in the Federal 
Register on October 12, 1994 (59 FR 51612). No request for a hearing or 
petition for leave to intervene was filed following this notice.
    The Commission has prepared an Environmental Assessment related to 
the action and has determined not to prepare an environmental impact 
statement. Based upon the environmental assessment, the Commission has 
concluded that the issuance of the amendment will not have a 
significant effect on the quality of the human environment (60 FR 
13476).
    For further details with respect to the action see (1) the 
application for amendment dated August 4, 1994, (2) Amendment No. 106 
to License No. NPF-49, (3) the Commission's related Safety Evaluation, 
and (4) the Commission's Environmental Assessment. All of these items 
are available for public inspection at the Commission's Public Document 
Room, the Gelman Building, 2120 L Street NW., Washington, DC, and at 
the local public document room located at the Learning Resource Center, 
Three Rivers Community-Technical College, Thames Valley Campus, 574 New 
London Turnpike, Norwich, CT 06360.

    Dated at Rockville, Md., this 17th day of March 1995.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Vernon L. Rooney, SR.,
Project Manager, Project Directorate I-4, Division of Reactor Projects-
I/II, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 95-7432 Filed 3-24-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2725

Price Pump Company:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 13, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3174

Teradyne, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn