alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Viy-.-6Am--f

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 24
- 0356 MARK MULLEE,

Plaintiff and Appellant,
v. WINTER SPORTS, INC., d/b/a WHITEFISH MOUNTAIN RESORT, DOES 1
- 5, individually,

Defendants and Appellees. ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT

This appeal being subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parties having failed to jointly and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c), IT IS ORDERED THAT **,** whose name appears next on the list of attorneys desiring appointment as mediators for Money Judgments appeals which is maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appointed to conduct the mediation process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time periods set forth in M.R.App.P., 7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appointment. A true copy of this order is being mailed to counsel of record for the parties, or to the parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof. DATED this N/A.

Bowen Greenwood, Clerk of the Supreme Court
c: Ian Philip Gillespie, Christopher Cameron Di Lorenzo, Mikel L. Moore, David F. Stufft 07/01/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0356
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4190

New York Air Brake, LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended
December 31, 2003, of Synagro Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"), as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J.
Paul Withrow, certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company and that the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                                                   /s/ J. Paul Withrow
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   J. Paul Withrow,
                                                   Chief Financial Officer and
                                                   Director
                                                   October 20, 2004
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6249

JERRY LYNN HIGH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DIANA MORGAN,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief

District Judge. (CA-03-799)

Submitted: August 12, 2004 Decided: August 17, 2004

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerry Lynn High, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Jerry Lynn High appeals the district court’s judgment

dismissing as frivolous his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as frivolous for the reasons

stated by the district court. See High v. Morgan, No. CA-03-799

(E.D.N.C. Dec. 11, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Soybean/maize Germplasm, Pathology, and Genetics Research: Urbana, IL
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Urbana, Illinois Soybean/maize Germplasm, Pathology, and Genetics Research Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Research Projects Subjects of Investigation at this LocationEach ARS research project has related subjects of investigation.  Listed below are the subjects of investigation currently conducted at this location.
Clicking on a subject of investigation will list the research projects within that  subject of investigation.Subjects of Investigation
                            Corn (for sweetcorn use 1480)
                                Soybean


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Exhibit 4.53

[CONFORMED COPY]

PRIMARY SURETY AGREEMENT
between

SBS
BROADCASTING S.A.

and

POSTABANK
ÉS TAKARÉKPÉNZTÁR RT.

Dated
March 24, 2003

---

ThisAGREEMENT(this "Agreement")is made in Budapest, on 24th of March, 2003 between

under
the following terms and conditions:

The
Parties state the following:



NOW THEREFOREthe Surety and the Bank hereby agree as follows:

ARTICLE I

ARTICLE IIPRIMARY SURETY

2

---



ARTICLE IIIREPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES

The Surety hereby represents and warrants to the Bank that:



3

---



ARTICLE IVMISCELLANEOUS

For the Surety:SBS Broadcasting S.A.
8-10 rue Mathias Hardt
BP 39, L-1717, Luxembourg
Attention: Corporate SecretaryFax:

+352 40 78 04With a Copy to:SBS Services B.V.
Rietlandpark 353
1019 EM Amsterdam
The NetherlandsAttention:

Erik T.Moe
Klaus FrederiksenFax:

+31 20 519 1996For the Bank:Postabank és Takarékpénztár Rt.
Müködési és Speciális Kockázatkezelési Divízió
1132 Budapest, Váci út 48.
HungaryAttention:

dr. Koji Ferenc
Lehoczky ArtúrFax:

+ 00 36 1 484 2141


4

---

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto, acting through their duly authorised representatives, have caused this Agreement to be signed in
their respective names as of the date first above written.

|SBS BROADCASTING S.A.           |  |                                                                                                   
|------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|By:                             |  | \s\ DAVID STOGELSBS Broadcasting S.A.Name: David Stogel
Title: Attorney-in-fact                   
|POSTABANK ÉS TAKARÉKPÉNZTÁR RT. |  |                                                                                                   
|By:                             |  | \s\ KOLTAI ZSOLTPostabank és Takarékpénztár Rt.Name: Koltai Zsolt
Title: Senior Executive Director

5

---

QuickLinks
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3250

CW Bearing USA, Inc:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6299

ZACHARY WILLIAMS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

FREDERICK MENIFEE; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE

STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA00-3504-CCB)

Submitted: September 20, 2001 Decided: October 15, 2001

Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Zachary Williams, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Mary Ann Rapp Ince, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* This case was placed in abeyance pending our decision in

Atkinson v. Angelone, No. 00-6187, 2001 WL 1020287 (4th Cir.

Sept. 6, 2001) (unpublished).

2

PER CURIAM:

Zachary Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s orders

denying his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 2001), as untimely filed and denying his motions filed under

Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error.* Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on

the reasoning of the district court. Williams v. Menifee, No. CA00-3504-CCB (D. Md. filed Feb. 1, 2001 & entered Feb. 2, 2001;

filed Feb. 7, 2001 & entered Feb. 8, 2001; Feb. 14, 2001). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED