alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2967

Price Pump Company:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
<PAGE>   1





                                   EXHIBIT 23

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
<PAGE>   2




                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-09707) pertaining to the 1992 Stock Option Plan of Living
Centers of America, Inc. of our report dated November 25, 1996, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Living Centers of
America, Inc. included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
September 30, 1996.




/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

December 16, 1996
Houston, Texas
Exhibit 10.1   SECOND AMENDMENT TO
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
 
 
 THIS
SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Second Amendment”) is made and
entered into effective as of July 1, 2009, by and between LMI AEROSPACE, INC., a
Missouri corporation (the “Corporation”), and Ronald S. Saks
(“Employee”).
 
 WHEREAS, the Corporation and
Employee entered into that certain Employment Agreement effective as of January
1, 2008, as amended as of April 24, 2008 (collectively the “Agreement”);
and
 
 WHEREAS, the Corporation and
Employee desire to amend the Agreement again as provided in this Second
Amendment;
 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the
Corporation and Employee hereby agree as follows:
 
 1.  The
Base Salary referenced in Section 3(A) of the Agreement shall be changed to
$310,000.00 effective July 1, 2009
 
 2.           All
references in the Agreement to this “Agreement” and any other references of
similar import shall henceforth mean the Agreement as amended by this Second
Amendment.
 
 3.           Except
to the extent specifically amended by this Second Amendment, all of the terms,
provisions, conditions, covenants, representations and warranties contained in
the Agreement shall be and remain in full force and effect and the same are
hereby ratified and confirmed.
 
 4.           This
Second Amendment shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the
Corporation and Employee and their respective heirs, executors, administrators,
legal administrators, successors and permitted assigns.
 
 5.           This
Second Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the
substantive laws of the State of Missouri (without reference to conflict of law
principles).
 
 The
parties have executed this Second Amendment as of the date first
above-written.
  LMI
      AEROSPACE, INC.
                  (“Corporation”)By:
                /s/
      Lawrence E. DickinsonTitle:
                Lawrence E.
      Dickinson
                  
                  Vice
      President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
                  (Principal
      Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
                  Officer)/s/
      Ronald S. SaksRonald
      S. Saks
                  (“Employee”)
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 47 (Friday, March 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13189-13190]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5836]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

Notice of Request for Reclearance of Form SF 2800

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (title 
44, U.S. Code, chapter 35), this notice announces a request for 
reclearance of an information collection. Form SF 2800, Application for 
Death Benefits Under the Civil Service Retirement 
[[Page 13190]] System, is used to collect information so that OPM can 
pay death benefits to the survivors of federal employees and 
annuitants.
    Approximately 70,000 applications are completed annually. It takes 
an estimated 30 minutes to complete the form. The total annual burden 
is 35,000 hours.
    For copies of this proposal, contact Doris R. Benz on (703) 908-
8564.

DATES: Comments on this proposal should be received by no later than 
April 10, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments to--

Lorraine E. Dettman, Chief, Operations Support Division, Retirement and 
Insurance Group, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, 
NW., Room 3349, Washington, DC 20415 and
Joseph Lackey, OPM Desk Officer, Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office 
Building, NW., Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503

FOR INFORMATION REGARDING ADMINISTRATIVE COORDINATION CONTACT: Mary 
Beth Smith-Toomey, Management Services Division, (202) 606-4025.

Office of Personnel Management.
Lorraine A. Green,
Deputy Director.
[FR Doc. 95-5836 Filed 3-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-01-M
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 18

- 00069

- CV

Carter W ind Energy and Texas

Central Resources LLC

v.

Erwin Lee Harvey, Sr. and Jay

Warne Carter, Jr. §

§

§

§ From the 78th District Court

of Wichita County (181,517

- B)

July 19, 2018

Per Curiam



### JUDGMENT ON REHEARING

This court has again considered the record on appeal in this case and

holds that the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is

dismissed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2685

Price Pump Company:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
Form of Series 13 Preferred Stock Certificate


 Exhibit 4.1 

 

			
	P13-	  	
		  	Series 13 Preferred Stock

 CELL THERAPEUTICS, INC. 
 A Washington Corporation 
 THIS CERTIFIES THAT
*                    * is the record holder of
*                 (                )* shares of Series 13
Preferred Stock of Cell Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Corporation”) transferable only on the share register of the Corporation by the holder, in person or by such holder’s duly authorized attorney, upon surrender of this
certificate properly endorsed or assigned. 
 This certificate and the shares represented hereby shall be held subject to all of
the provisions of the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation and the Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Corporation and any amendments thereto, a copy of each of which is on file at the office of the Corporation and made a part hereof
as fully as though the provisions of said Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation and Second Amended and Restated Bylaws were imprinted in full on this Certificate, to all of which the holder of this Certificate, by acceptance hereof, assents
and agrees to be bound. 
 The shares represented by this Certificate are convertible into shares of Common Stock as set forth
in the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation. 
 The Corporation will furnish without charge to each
shareholder who so requests, the powers, designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights of each class of stock or series thereof and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions of such preferences or
rights. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officers this
     day of         , 2011. 
  

					
	  
 James A. Bianco,
M.D. Chief Executive Officer
	 		  	  
 Louis A. Bianco,
Executive Vice President,

		 		  	Finance and Administration

 no par value 






 FOR VALUE RECEIVED, THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY SELLS, ASSIGNS AND TRANSFERS UNTO
                 SHARES REPRESENTED BY THE WITHIN CERTIFICATE AND DOES HEREBY IRREVOCABLY CONSTITUTE AND APPOINT
                     ATTORNEY TO TRANSFER THE SAID SHARES ON THE SHARE REGISTER OF THE WITHIN NAMED CORPORATION WITH FULL POWER OF
SUBSTITUTION IN THE PREMISES. 
 DATED
                     
  

	
	  

	(Signature)


 NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE ON THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THIS
CERTIFICATE, IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT, OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER. 
 no par value
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 7, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 12415-12416]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5552]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[TD 8581]
RIN 1545-AQ87


Certain Cash or Deferred Arrangements and Employee and Matching 
Contributions Under Employee Plans; Correction

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Correction to final regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The final regulations (TD 8581), which are the subject of 
these corrections were published in the Federal Register for Friday, 
December 23, 1994 (59 FR 66165). The final regulations govern certain 
cash or deferred arrangements and employee and matching contributions 
under employee plans.

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 23, 1994.

[[Page 12416]] FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Catherine Livingston 
Fernandez at (202) 622-4606 (not a toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The final regulations that are the subject of these corrections are 
under sections 401(a)(30), 401(k), 401(m), 402(a)(8), 402(g), 
411(d)(6), 415(c), 416 and 4979 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Need for Correction

    As published, TD 8581 contains typographical errors that are in 
need of correction.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, the publication of the final regulations which is the 
subject of FR Doc. 94-31427, is corrected as follows:
    1. On page 66165, column 2, in the preamble following the paragraph 
heading ``1. Coordination With Regulations Under Sections 401(a)(4), 
401(a)(17), 410(b), and 414(s)'', paragraph 2, line 10, the section 
``410(k)'' is corrected to read ``401(k)''.


Sec. 1.401(k)-1  [Corrected]

    2. On page 66173, column 2, Sec. 1.401(k)-1, paragraph 
(f)(3)(iii)(C), line 11, the regulations section ``Sec. 410(b)-7(c)'' 
is corrected to read ``Sec. 1.410(b)-7(c)''.


Sec. 1.401(m)-1  [Corrected]

    3. On page 66178, column 1, Sec. 1.401(m)-1, paragraph (e)(6), 
Example 3., third line from the bottom of the paragraph, the language 
``in compensation). Since Plan X satisfies the'' is corrected to read 
``in compensation. Since Plan X satisfies the''.
Cynthia E. Grigsby,
Chief, Regulations Unit, Assistant Chief Counsel (Corporate).
[FR Doc. 95-5552 Filed 3-6-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:See attached file shallow well pump
#### STATE v. J. C. HOUSE.

(Filed 7 April, 1937.)

1. Criminal Law § 81c—

Where defendant is tried upon two counts and judgment is pronounced on a general verdict of guilty, the refusal of defendant’s motion for judgment as of nonsuit on one count, there being no motion to nonsuit as to the other count, cannot be held for prejudicial error.

2. Intoxicating Liquor § 9e—

The instruction of the court upon the presumption from the possession of more than one gallon of whiskey *held*without error.

3. Criminal Law § 53f—

An exception to the statement of the contentions of the parties will not be considered when no objection is noted at the time.

4. Criminal Law § 56—

Exception to the denial of a motion in arrest of judgment on the ground that the special term of court at which defendant was tried was not properly advertised held untenable on this record.

*471Appeal by defendant from *Williams, J.,*at January Special Term, 1937, of Pitt.

Eo error.

Tbe defendant was charged with maintaining a common nuisance, and also with tbe possession of whiskey for tbe purpose of sale.

Prom judgment pronounced on a general verdict of guilty, tbe defendant appealed.

*Attorney-General Seawell and Assistant Attorney-General McMullan for the State.*

*Albion Dunn for defendant, appellant.*

Pee Curiam.

Appellant assigns as error the denial of bis motion for nonsuit on the charge of maintaining a nuisance, but this cannot be sustained, as there was evidence of possession of whiskey for the purpose of sale as charged in the second count, and the jury returned a general verdict of guilty. *S. v. Pace,*210 N. C., 255; *S. v. Norris,*206 N. C., 191; *S. v. McAllister,*187 N. C., 400; *S. v. Switzer,*187 N. C., 88. There was no motion for nonsuit on the second count.

The charge of the court as to the *prima facie*effect of possession of more than one gallon of whiskey was in substantial accord with the rule laid down in *S. v. Wilkerson,*164 N. C., 431, and other cases. the charge was free from error.

The exception to the,recital of certain testimony in the judge’s charge is without merit, as the judge was stating the contentions of the parties and no objection was noted at the time. *S. v. Baldwin,*184 N. C., 791. Purthermore, it appears the statement of the court to which exception was noted was substantially as testified, without objection, by witness Whitehurst.

The motion in arrest of judgment on the ground that the special term of court was not properly advertised is untenable on this record. The defendant appeared at a properly authorized special term of court, and when bis case was called, entered bis plea of not guilty, made no motion to quash, nor objection to the jury. the ruling in *S. v. Baxter,*208 N. C., 90, is inapplicable here. *S. v. Boykin, ante,*407.

There were no other assignments of error brought forward in defendant’s brief or presented on tbe argument. In tbe trial we find

Eo error.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2532

Reelcraft Industries:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-1637

C.H. Hanson Co:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
#### OSAGE HOMESTEAD CORPORATION, a Missouri Corporation, d/b/a St. Charles Drilling Company, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW FLORENCE, Missouri, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 54375.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Dec. 13, 1988.

Wayne T. Schoeneberg, St. Charles, for defendant-appellant.

Frederick W. Drakesmith, St. Charles, for plaintiff-respondent.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from an adverse judgment in plaintiffs action for breach of contract. We affirm. The trial court’s judgment is reviewable under Rule 73.01, is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears; and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
3XEOLF'RFXPHQW

0LQLDWXUH'&0RWRU±0RGHO5)

+76

6SHFLILFDWLRQVDQGDSKRWRDUHDWWDFKHG7KHSKRWRVKRZVWZRPRWRUVXQGHUWKLVVDPHPRGHODQG±KHQFH±WKH

VDPH+76RQHZLWKDQH[WHUQDOGULYHVKDIWDQGRQHZLWKDEUDVVZHLJKWDWWDFKHGWRWKHGULYHVKDIW7KHZHLJKWLV

XVHGIRUYLEUDWLRQ%RWKDUHWKHVDPHPRGHO5)/DQGLPSRUWHGIURP&KLQDW\SLFDOO\XQGHUWKHVDPH

%LOORI/DGLQJDQG&XVWRPV(QWU\7KHPRWRUVRSHUDWHRQYROWV'&'LPHQVLRQV±WKDWLVGLDPHWHUVDQGRYHUDOO

OHQJWKVIRUERWKYHUVLRQVDUHRWKHUZLVHLGHQWLFDO



67(51-$0(6

6281'352'8&7,216/7'

-$0(667(5135(6,'(17

,PSRUWHU

<(6

3XEOLF'RFXPHQW
12

12

 

 

 

'HDU6LU0DGDPH

6RXQG3URGXFWLRQV/WGLVDSURGXFWGHYHORSPHQWFRPSDQ\DQGLPSRUWH[SRUWGLVWULEXWRURIGLYHUVHLWHPVVXFKDV

WR\SDUWVDGYHUWLVLQJVSHFLDOWLHVVSRUWLQJJRRGFRPSRQHQWVDQGOLJKWLQGXVWULDOPDFKLQHU\WRROLQJIRUWKH

EHYHUDJHLQGXVWU\0RVWRIWKHSURGXFWVWKDWZHLPSRUWDUHSDUWVRUFRPSRQHQWVIRULWHPVWKDWDUHXOWLPDWHO\

DVVHPEOHGDQGSDFNDJHGLQWKH86$

2QFHVXFKLPSRUWHGSURGXFWLVDPLQLDWXUH'&0RWRUZKLFKKDVEHHQVXEMHFWHGWRWKHDGGLWLRQDODGYDORUHPGXW\

RILPSRVHGRQ+76

6SHFLILFDWLRQVDQGDSKRWRDUHDWWDFKHG7KHSKRWRVKRZVWZRPRWRUVXQGHUWKLVVDPHPRGHODQG±KHQFH±WKH

VDPH+76RQHZLWKDQH[WHUQDOGULYHVKDIWDQGRQHZLWKDEUDVVZHLJKWDWWDFKHGWRWKHGULYHVKDIW7KHZHLJKW

LVXVHGIRUYLEUDWLRQ%RWKDUHWKHVDPHPRGHO5)/DQGLPSRUWHGIURP&KLQDW\SLFDOO\XQGHUWKH

VDPH%LOORI/DGLQJDQG&XVWRPV(QWU\7KHPRWRUVRSHUDWHRQYROWV'&'LPHQVLRQV±WKDWLVGLDPHWHUV

DQGRYHUDOOOHQJWKVIRUERWKYHUVLRQVDUHRWKHUZLVHLGHQWLFDO

7KHPRWRUVDUHXVHGE\DFOLHQWRIRXUVWKDWPDQXIDFWXUHVWR\VIRUVSHFLDOQHHGVGLVDEOHGFKLOGUHQKHUHLQWKH

86$DQG±WRWKHEHVWRIRXUNQRZOHGJH±WKHPRWRULVQRWDYDLODEOHIURPDQ\86$PDQXIDFWXUHUV+DYLQJEHHQ

LQYROYHGLQWKHWR\LQGXVWU\IRU\HDUVZHDFWXDOO\FDQQRWUHFDOOHYHUEHLQJDEOHWRVRXUFHWKHVHYHU\VPDOODQG

LQH[SHQVLYHPRWRUVLQWKH86$

:HWKHUHIRUHKHUE\UHVSHFWIXOO\UHTXHVWDQH[FOXVLRQIRUWKHSURSULHWDU\'&PRWRULGHQWLILHGDERYHIURPWKH

DGGLWLRQDODGYDORUHPGXW\RILPSRVHGRQ+76SXUVXDQWWRWKH6HFWLRQILQGLQJQRWLFH

SXEOLVKHGRQ-XQH

7KDQN\RXIRU\RXUFRQVLGHUDWLRQRIRXUUHTXHVW

6LQFHUHO\

6281'352'8&7,216/7'

-DPHV6WHUQ

3UHVLGHQW
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4194 

To amend the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956 to reauthorize the volunteer 

services, community partnership, and refuge education programs of the 

National Wildlife Refuge System, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 12, 2022 

Mr. CARPER (for himself and Mrs. CAPITO) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956 to reauthorize 

the volunteer services, community partnership, and refuge education programs of the National Wildlife Refuge 

System, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Keep America’s Ref5 uges Operational Act of 2022’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4194 IS

1 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF NATIONAL WILDLIFE REF2 UGE SYSTEM VOLUNTEER SERVICES, COMMU3 NITY PARTNERSHIP, AND REFUGE EDU4 CATION PROGRAMS. 

5 Section 7(g) of the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956 

6 (16 U.S.C. 742f(g)) is amended by striking ‘‘2018 

7 through 2022’’ and inserting ‘‘2022 through 2026’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS