alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3827 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3827

   To increase the amount of loan forgiveness available to teachers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 14, 2022

Mr. Whitehouse introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To increase the amount of loan forgiveness available to teachers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Teacher Loan Forgiveness Improvement 
Act of 2022''.

SEC. 2. INCREASED LOAN FORGIVENESS FOR TEACHERS.

    Section 428J(c) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
1078-10(c)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``$5,000'' and inserting 
        ``$15,000''; and
            (2) in paragraph (3), by striking ``$17,500'' and inserting 
        ``$30,000''.

SEC. 3. INCREASED LOAN CANCELLATION FOR TEACHERS.

    Section 460(c) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
1087j(c)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``$5,000'' and inserting 
        ``$15,000''; and
            (2) in paragraph (3), by striking ``$17,500'' and inserting 
        ``$30,000''.

SEC. 4. APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS.

    The amendments made by this Act shall apply with respect to any 
borrower who completes the fifth complete school year of teaching 
required for loan forgiveness under section 428J(b) of the Higher 
Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1078-10(b)), or for loan cancellation 
under section 460(b) of such Act (20 U.S.C. 1087j(b)), on or after the 
date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR ADAMS GOLF, INC. AND
ITS SUBSIDIARIES FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN 
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       3,363,814
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               17,387,819
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,148,805
<INVENTORY>                                  9,669,874
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            31,948,314
<PP&E>                                       3,680,507
<DEPRECIATION>                                 632,569
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              45,904,741
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,093,705
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,099
<OTHER-SE>                                  31,791,937
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                45,904,741
<SALES>                                     58,328,194
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            58,328,194
<CGS>                                       13,625,444
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,386,730
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,040,643
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               646,213
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              43,394
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             19,518,181
<INCOME-TAX>                                 7,218,672
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         12,299,509
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                12,299,509
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .66
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit No.
32.1


Form
10-KSB


Truewest
Corporation


File
No.  33-56574








Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report of Truewest Corporation (the “Company”) on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Glenn A. Little,
Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and


(2)
              the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








Date:
      October 15, 2008
              By: /s/
      Glenn A. LittleGlenn
      A. LittleChief
      Executive andChief
      Financial Officer











A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Truewest Corporation and will be retained by Truewest Corporation and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2676

Reelcraft Industries:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2560

Primex Family of Companies:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2704

Price Pump Company:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Renewable Product Technology Research: Peoria, IL
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    NCAUR homepageSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Peoria, Illinois National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research Renewable Product Technology Research Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Research Projects Subjects of Investigation at this LocationEach ARS research project has related subjects of investigation.  Listed below are the subjects of investigation currently conducted at this location.
Clicking on a subject of investigation will list the research projects within that  subject of investigation.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
,.,( . 

y: OFFICE OF TNE A’ITORNEYGENERAL OF TEXAS 

i. AUSTIN 

5 ,,T 

g-c.Mmn ‘-” 

mweasmv-- 

/.. 
nottoP8blo li. A. zwvl8, PDge a 

She iwuutoe of ee~Mflbd oopLe8 of birth'or. d.ath 

8Mt 6 oePtiii8d oooJ.of the P8ooPd Of @ty 

..~ .~OPd88thP8@8tiPOdWt&l' 

. *hioh he DhDll b8 OatHled to 8 See of fifty 

UO&8 (50#), t0 bo wd w tb, 8pPlbUtt;. 

Altduly8ueho~~ofthePeeoPdor8blPth 

,, op dwth, whetl pPqoPl7 ooP8iiied b7 aa st8to 

8t~8~, dmll be W.BO h8le evld8noo in 

8OUPt: ~$t$ 

8tat.d. 

POOD Of 8hO i8Ob8 tyP8in 

., 

&.denoe in 8 oourt of mooti.m 

Roxto~8ble Y. i, ~vtb, Page 4 

.‘~. .:... 

. 

. 

. 

: ‘.’ ” 

. 

;:
#### Cecil POYNER *v.*ARKANSAS CONTRACTORS LICENSING BOARD Bruce Earl Ward *v.*State of Arkansas

98-952

CR 98-657

985 S.W.2d 297

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered December 11, 1998

*Lyon, Emerson & Cone,*for appellant Cecil Poyner.

No response.

*Deborah R. Sailings,*for appellant Bruce Earl Ward.

No response.

Per Curiam.

The procedural background in this matter is set forth in our *per curiam*orders issued on November 19, 1998. *Poyner v. Arkansas Contractors Licensing Bd.,*335 Ark. 260, 979 S.W.2d 902 (1998); *Ward v. State,*335 Ark. 265, 979 S.W.2d 902 (1998). Ms. Lené Collins-Sontag, substitute court reporter for the Third and Seventh Divisions of Pulaski County Circuit Court, was cited to appear before this court on December 10, 1998, at 9:00 a.m. to show cause why she should not be held in contempt of this court for her failure to comply in a timely manner with the command of the writs of certiorari issued on September 10, 1998, and September 17, 1998. *Id.*Ms. Collins-Sontag did not appear.

Because Ms. Collins-Sontag failed to appear before this court on December 10, 1998, as ordered by the *per curiam*orders *380issued on November 19, 1998, we hereby order the State Police to take immediate custody of Ms. Collins-Sontag and deliver her to the Pulaski County Detention Facility, where she shall be held until such time as her appearance can be scheduled before this court.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                                CERTIFICATION (1)


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor
Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as adopted), Anna E. Gluskin, Chief
Executive Officer and President of Generex Biotechnology Corporation (the
"Company"), and Rose C. Perri, Chief Operating Officer of the Company, each
hereby certifies that, to the best of his or her knowledge:

     1. The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended January
31, 2003, and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 99.1 (the
"Periodic Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the
period covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company
for the period covered by the Periodic Report.


DATE: March 14, 2003

                              By:          /s/ Anna Gluskin
                                  --------------------------------------------
                                  Anna E. Gluskin, Chief Executive Officer
                                  (Principal Executive Officer)



DATE: March 14, 2003

                                By: /s/ Rose C. Perri
                                  --------------------------------------------
                                  Rose C. Perri, Chief Operating Officer
                                  (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) THIS CERTIFICATION ACCOMPANIES THIS REPORT PURSUANT TO SS. 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 AND SHALL NOT BE DEEMED "FILED" BY THE COMPANY FOR
PURPOSES OF SECTION 18 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED.
#### THE CITY OF REIDSVILLE, a Municipal Corporation, v. CHARLES M. TURNER and Wife, CATHERINE LEWIS TURNER, BRUCE H. TURNER and Wife, EDNA G. TURNER, W. O. McGIBBONY, Trustee, and FEDERAL LAND BANK OF COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA.

(Filed 22 May, 1957.)

Appeal by petitioner from *Olive, J.,*12 September, 1956, Term, of ROCKINGHAM.

Proceeding under G.S. Ch. 40 to condemn the fee in 101.18 acres, the bottom land on the 323-acre dairy farm of respondents Turner, for use, together with other lands, in the construction and maintenance of a reservoir in connection with plaintiff’s water system. The other respondents were joined because of their respective interests under a deed of trust on the Turner land.

The-court submitted, and the jury answered, the sole issue raised by the pleadings, viz.: “What amount are respondents entitled to recover of petitioner, City of Reidsville? Answer: $32,100.00.”

The judgment entered adjudged that respondents Turner recover from petitioner the sum of $32,100.00 and' costs, and that “the full fee simple title” to the land described and condemned in the proceeding vested in petitioner. Petitioner excepted and appealed.

*Jule McMichael for petitioner, appellant.*

*Frazier & Frazier and Price & Osborne for respondents, appellees.*

*339Per CuRiam.

The trial was conducted in accordance with the law as established by the decisions of this Court. While appellant brings forward thirty-one assignments of error, they relate to incidents of the trial rather than to basic principles of law.

Upon conflicting evidence, the amount of compensation to which respondents Turner were entitled was determined by the jury. Careful consideration fails to disclose error sufficiently prejudicial to petitioner to require a new trial. Having reached this conclusion, it would serve no useful purpose to discuss in detail the background and particulars of the several assignments.

No error.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-2509

HP Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Market Hub Partners Storage, L.P. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gregory J. Rizzo, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/    GREGORY J. RIZZOGregory J. Rizzo President





August 14, 2002
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23


                             CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
                          CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


VARSITY SPIRIT CORPORATION
MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE


        We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-57974) and the Registration Statement on Form S-8
(No. 33-84940) of our reports dated February 12, 1997, related to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Varsity Spirit Corporation
appearing in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1996.


                                                BDO SEIDMAN, LLP

Memphis, Tennessee
March 28, 1997
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION**
 
 Pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Industrial Enterprises
        of
        America, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to
        such officer’s knowledge, that the Company’s Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly
        Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 fully complies
        with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained
        in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
        condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the period
        presented in this report.
 
 Dated: December
        5,2006
  /s/ John D. Mazzuto
 **John
        D. Mazzuto**
 Chief
        Financial Officer
  
 The
        foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
        1350 and is not being filed as part of this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly
        Report on Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure
        document.