alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR ADAMS GOLF, INC. AND
ITS SUBSIDIARIES FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY TO SUCH UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           8,347
<SECURITIES>                                    15,954
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,460
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,945
<INVENTORY>                                     16,531
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                53,119
<PP&E>                                          11,059
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,747
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  68,711
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,096
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            23
<OTHER-SE>                                      62,510
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    68,711
<SALES>                                         36,450
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,450
<CGS>                                           12,727
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   30,107
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,482
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,214
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (21)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (16,938)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,121)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (15,817)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,817)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.70)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.70)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          32,285
<SECURITIES>                                     5,483
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,117
<ALLOWANCES>                                       112
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                51,725
<PP&E>                                           4,659
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,993
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  54,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,772
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           168
<OTHER-SE>                                      47,753
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    54,900
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,808
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,763
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    60
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   8
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,508
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,368
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,140
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,140
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11
        

</TABLE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2442

Braeburn Systems LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice published at 

83 FR 67463 (‘the exclusion notice’) and posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/2018-28277.pdf.

The scope of your exclusion is governed by the scope of the formal HTSUS product 

description in the Annex to the exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in 

any particular request for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted 

by excluding from the additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description 

contained in the Annex to the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
#### MORGAN P. BODIE v. B. C. HORN.

(Filed 17 March, 1937.)

Contracts § 7d—

A contract for “cotton futures” in which no actual delivery is intended or contemplated is void and no action may be maintained thereon.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Sink, J.,*at September Term, 1936, of RuTHEREOED.

Civil action to recover balance alleged to be due on certain “cotton contracts” purchased by plaintiff from defendant “on call” and “closed out” when plaintiff failed to “put up sufficient margin to protect said contracts.”

Demurrer interposed on the ground that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Demurrer sustained. Plaintiff appeals.

*B. T. J ones, Jr., for plaintiff, appellant.*

*T. J. Moss for defendant, appellee.*

Pee Oubiam.

The basis of the judgment is that the transactions alleged in the complaint are denominated “futures,” no actual delivery of the articles sold being intended or contemplated, and therefore declared illegal by C. S., 2144. *Orvis Bros. & Co. v. Holt-Morgan Mills,*173 N. C., 231, 91 S. E., 948. It is also observed that the complaint contains no allegation of a promise to pay on the part of the defendant, which, perhaps, the plaintiff assumed the law would imply. However, in all events, the judgment sustaining the demurrer would seem to be correct.

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CEO      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** (18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

| 1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2)   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:           August                7, 2007 |                                            |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                 | /s/  John                R. Plachetka |
|                                                                                                 | John                R. Plachetka, Pharm.D.      |
|                                                                                                 | Chief                Executive Officer          |

----
**Exhibit
10.5**
 **OPTION
AGREEMENT**
 
 
 This
Option Agreement evidences the grant of a stock option (the "Option") to
purchase shares of common stock, par value $.001 (the "Company Stock"), of
Generex Biotechnology Corporation (the "Company") granted to **Brian
McGee** (the
"Optionee") pursuant to the Generex Biotechnology Corporation 2001 Stock Option
Plan (the “Plan”), a copy of which is attached to this Option Agreement and
incorporated into this Option Agreement by reference. The Option is subject to
the terms, conditions, limitations and restrictions set forth in the Plan,
including the following:
 
 a.  The date
of grant of the Option is **April
5, 2005** and the
number of shares of Company Stock that may be purchased upon exercise of the
Option is **100,000
(One Hundred Thousand Dollars)** .
 
 b.  The
purchase price (the “Exercise Price”) of Company Stock subject to the Option is
 **$0.56** per
share.
 
 c.  The
Option is fully vested upon issuance.
 
 d.  Unless
sooner terminated pursuant to the Plan, the Option shall terminate on **April
4, 2010.** Option
will survive the termination of the Optionee’s employment.
 
 e.  The
Optionee shall pay the Exercise Price for the Option (i) in cash or (ii) by such
other method as may be approved by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s
Board of Directors. The Optionee shall pay the amount of any withholding tax due
at the time of exercise, as provided in the Plan.
 
 f.  The
rights and interests of the Optionee under this Option Agreement may not be
sold, assigned, encumbered or otherwise transferred, except, in the event of the
death of the Optionee, by will or by the laws of descent and
distribution.
 
 g.  Any
notice to the Company, including notice of exercise of an Option, shall be
addressed to the Company in care of Slava Jarnitskii at the Company’s principal
offices.
 
 IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, this Option Agreement has been executed on behalf of the
Company by a duly authorized officer and by the Optionee effective as of the
date of grant of the Option.


GENEREX BIOTECHNOLOGY
      CORPORATION
    
    
    ACCEPTED AND AGREED:By:
    /s/ Rose C. Perri
    
    
    /s/
      Brian McGeeROSE C. PERRI
    
    
    Brian
McGee
STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS MARCEL DEWAYNE THOMPSON NO. 

### 2023 KW 0895


### OCTOBER 23, 2023

In Re: Marcel Dewayne Thompson, 

### applying for 

### supervisory writs, 

### 22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of St. 

## Tammany, No. 

### 558732.
BEFORE: WELCH, HOLDRIDGE, AND WOLFE, JJ.

WRIT DENIED. The record shows that 

### in exchange for a 

## forty -

year sentence onadouble bill, relator voluntarily waived his right to a 

### habitual offender 

## hearing and stipulated to the allegations contained 

### in the habitual offender 

### bill of information. As a result, relator waived appellate review of the sentence, his status as a habitual offender, 

### and any claim that the State 

### failed to prove the applicable 

### cleansing period did not 

### lapse. See La. R.S. 

### 15:529.1 (D) ( 1) ( b) ; State v. White, 

### 2021-0202 ( La. 

## App. lst Cir. 

### 10/4/21), 330 So.3d 663, 666-67. Therefore, 

### the district court did not 

## errbydenying the motion 

### to correct an illegal habitual offender sentence.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3470

CW Bearing USA, Inc:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
was made in good faith, it further found that Kieckhefer could nonetheless

win his defamation lawsuit by showing that Schmidt made the statement with malice. On appeal, Schmidt argues that Kieckhefer failed to show by clear and convincing evidence a probability of success in his defamation suit. He argues that the Las Vegas Sun article may be read to imply that the "longtime leader" that Kieckhefer supported was Harry Reid.

Prior to 2013, this court treated special motions to dismiss as motions for summary judgment and therefore reviewed the resulting orders de novo. 2 See John v. Douglas Cnty. Sch, Dist., 125 Nev. 746, 753, 219 P.3d 1276, 1281 (2009). After 2013, however, with the plaintiffs burden increased to clear and convincing evidence, this court will provide greater deference to the lower court's findings of fact and therefore will review for an abuse of discretion.

"This court will affirm a district court's order if the district court reached the correct result, even if for the wrong reason." SaavedraSandoval v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 126 Nev. 592, 599, 245 P.3d 1198, 1202 (2010). We conclude that the district court correctly denied Schmidt's motion to dismiss, but abused its discretion when it erroneously found that Schmidt made his statements in good faith. There is no rational way to read the Las Vegas Sun article without concluding that Kieckhefer

2 NRS 41.660(3)(a), as enacted in 1997, provided specific instruction to "R]reat the motion as a motion for summary judgment." In 2013, the legislature amended NRS 41.660(3)(b) to require the plaintiff establish by clear and convincing evidence his or her probability of prevailing on the merits.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2
(0) 1.947A 44e4

## jA i 51 ns2_

Parraguirre

A J. Pickering supported Raggio for majority leader. Because one cannot rationally infer from this article that Kieckhefer supported Reid and there has been absolutely no other evidence presented that supports Schmidt's statement, we conclude that he did not act in good faith when he claimed that Kieckhefer supported Reid. 3 Accordingly, we ORDER the decision of the district court AFFIRMED.



# fi
c4A , C.J. Hardesty

CC: Hon. Jerome M. Polaha, District Judge Charles R. Kozak McDonald Carano Wilson LLP/Las Vegas McDonald Carano Wilson LLP/Reno Washoe District Court Clerk

3 It is therefore unnecessary to reach a conclusion on the second prong of the special motion to dismiss, namely whether Kieckhefer has shown clear and convincing evidence that he has a probability of success on the merits of his defamation suit.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 3
(0) 1947 A 

### e
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50243

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JESUS AARON CANAS-BARRAZA

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:06-CR-1715-ALL

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jesus Aaron Canas-Barraza

raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States,

523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty

provision and not a separate criminal offense. See United States v.

Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (Aug.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

November 8, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-50243

2

28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is

GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4168 

To amend title 54, United States Code, to reauthorize the National Park 

Foundation. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 10, 2022 

Mr. PORTMAN (for himself, Mr. KING, and Mr. DAINES) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend title 54, United States Code, to reauthorize the 

National Park Foundation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Park Founda5 tion Reauthorization Act of 2022’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE NA7 TIONAL PARK FOUNDATION. 

8 Section 101122(a) of title 54, United States Code, 

9 is amended— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 4168 IS

1 (1) by striking ‘‘$5,000,000’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘$15,000,000’’; and 

3 (2) by striking ‘‘2023’’ and inserting ‘‘2030’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2644

Reelcraft Industries:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
Exhibit 99.1

Certification  Pursuant  to  Section  906 of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of title 18,  United States Code),  each of the
undersigned  officers of Ener1, Inc., Florida corporation (the "Company"),  does
hereby certify, to the best of such officer's knowledge and belief, that:

(1)  The Annual  Report on Form 10KSB for the year ended  December 31, 2002,  of
     the Company fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Form 10K-Annual Report fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     the Company.



Dated: April 15 2003                       /s/ Larry L. Light
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Larry L. Light
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer


Dated: April 15 2003                       /s/ R. Michael Brewer
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           R. Michael Brewer
                                           Chief Financial Officer






                                       53
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TECHNISOURCE,
INC.'S CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      19,217,114
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,218,170
<ALLOWANCES>                                   558,933
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            33,625,337
<PP&E>                                       3,295,806
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,131,350
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              36,071,405
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,004,493
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       103,850
<OTHER-SE>                                  32,897,674
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                36,071,405
<SALES>                                     75,467,140
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            75,467,140
<CGS>                                       56,162,571
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               56,162,571
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            14,264,741
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               147,459
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             125,163
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,158,248
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,070,564<F1>
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,087,684<F1>
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,087,684<F1>
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.37<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.37<F1>
<FN>
<F1>Pro forma as if the Company were subject to federal and all applicable state
corporate income taxes for the period presented.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>