12782 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 8, 1995 / Notices

essentially the same as the Diamond

Mountain Proposed Resource

Management Plan and Final

Environmental Impact Statement

(PRMP/FEIS). No changes to the

proposed decisions have been made.

However, some clarifying language has

been included as a result of four protests

the BLM received on the PRMP/FEIS.

The clarifying language concerned the

intent of the priority management level

concept as used in the PRMP/FEIS;

current livestock forage assignments and

practices as affected by wildlife

reintroductions and recreation area

developments; and corrective actions

involving existing airports in trespass.

Five alternatives that encompass a

spectrum of realistic management

options were considered in the planning

process. The final plan is a mixture of

the management objectives and actions

that, in the opinion of the BLM, best

resolve the issues and concerns that

drove the preparation of the plan.

Wild and Scenic Rivers

The Upper Green River Segment

(between Little Hole and the Colorado

stateline) is determined to be suitable

and recommended for designation as a

scenic river.

The Lower Green River Segment

(between public land boundary south of

Ouray and the Carbon County line) is

determined to be suitable as a scenic

river. This segment is not recommended

for designation because studies have not

yet been completed on the adjacent

downstream segment through

Desolation Canyon.

Areas of Critical Environmental

Concern (ACEC)

The plan designates the following

seven areas as ACECs: Browns Park

Complex (55,700 public acres), Lears

Canyon (1,400 public acres), Lower

Green River (7,900 public acres), Nine

Mile Canyon (50,800 public acres),

Pariette Wetlands (11,600 public acres),

Red Creek Watershed (24,200 public

acres), and Red Mountain-Dry Fork

Complex (25,800 public acres).

Coordinated resource management

activity plans will be prepared for each

ACEC to detail protective measures.

G. William Lamb,

Acting State Director.

[FR Doc. 95–5570 Filed 3–7–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–DQ–P

[AK–932–1430–01; F–022963]

Conformance to Survey; Alaska

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management,

Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: This notice provides official

publication of the surveyed description

for the Noatak National Guard Site at

Noatak, Alaska. The site was withdrawn

by Public Land Order No. 2020 for use

by the Department of the Army. The plat

of survey was officially filed in the

Department of the Interior, Bureau of

Land Management, Washington, D.C.,

on June 21, 1961. United States Survey

No. 3778, Lot 3, containing 0.50 acre,

represents the land that was previously

described as follows:

A tract of land on the Noatak River, north

of Kotzebue, at approximate latitude 67°35′

N., longitude 163°00′ W. Beginning at Corner

No. 1 of U.S. Survey No. 2037, being the

northwest corner thereof;

Thence along an extension of the west line

of U.S. Survey No. 2037, N. 18°51′ E., 29

feet;

Thence N. 71°09′ W., 180 feet;

Thence N. 14°58′ W., 221.49 feet to the point

of beginning;

Thence N. 68°18′ W., 140 feet;

Thence N. 21°42′ E., 200 feet;

Thence S. 68°18′ E., 220 feet;

Thence S. 21°42′ W., 200 feet;

Thence N. 68°18′ W., 80 feet to the point of

beginning.

The area as described contained

approximately 1.01 acres.

ADDRESSES: Inquiries about this land

should be sent to the Alaska State

Office, Bureau of Land Management,

222 W. 7th Avenue, No. 13, Anchorage,

Alaska 99513–7599.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sue

A. Wolf, BLM Alaska State Office, 907–

271–5477.

Dated: February 17, 1995.

Sue A. Wolf,

Chief, Branch of Land Resources.

[FR Doc. 95–5571 Filed 3–7–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–JA–P

Fish and Wildlife Service

Finding of No Significant Impact for an

incidental Take Permit for the

Proposed Westminster Glen

Subdivision, Austin, Travis County, TX

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service,

Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife

Service has prepared an Environmental

Assessment for issuance of a Section

10(a)(1)(B) permit for the incidental take

of the Federally endangered goldencheeked warbler (Dendroica

chrysoparia) during the construction

and operation of a residential

development in northwest Travis

County, Texas.

Proposed Action

The proposed action is the issuance of

a permit under Section 10(a)(1)(B) of the

Endangered Species Act to authorize the

incidental take of the golden—cheeked

warbler.

The Applicant plans to construct

single-family residences on 270 acres in

northwest Travis County, Texas. The

proposed development will comply

with all local, regional, State, and

Federal environmental regulations

addressing environmental impacts

association with this type of

development. Details of the mitigation

are provided in the MaBe, Inc.,

(Applicant) Westminster Glen

Subdivision Environmental

Assessment/Habitat Conservation Plan.

Guarantees for implementation are

provided in the Implementing

Agreement. These conservation plan

actions ensure that the criteria

established for issuance of an incidental

take permit will be fully satisfied.

Alternatives Considered

1. Proposed action,

2. Wait for issuance of a Regional 10(a)

permit,

3. No action.

Determination

Based upon information contained in

the Environmental Assessment/Habitat

Conservation Plan, the Service has

determined that this action is not a

major Federal action which would

significantly affect the quality of the

human environment within the meaning

of Section 102(2)(c) of the National

Environmental Policy Act of 1969.

Accordingly, the preparation of an

Environmental Impact Statement on the

proposed action is not warranted.

It is my decision to issue the Section

10(a)(1)(B) permit for the construction

and operation of the Westminster Glen

residential development in Travis

County, Texas.

James A. Young,

Acting Regional Director, Region 2,

Albuquerque, New Mexico.

[FR Doc. 95–5619 Filed 3–7–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–55–M