Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 53 / Monday, March 20, 1995 / Notices 14805

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Robert M. Bernero,

Director, Office of Nuclear Materials Safety

and Safeguards.

[FR Doc. 95–6733 Filed 3–17–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P

[Docket Nos. 50–317 and 50–318]

Baltimore Gas and Electric Co., Calvert

Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Unit Nos. 1

and 2; Notice of Partial Withdrawal of

Application for Amendment to Facility

Operating License

The United States Nuclear Regulatory

Commission (the Commission) has

granted the request by the Baltimore Gas

and Electric Company (BG&E) to

withdraw a portion of its December 8,

1993, application for proposed

amendments to Facility Operating

License Nos. DPR–53 and DPR–69 for

the Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant,

Unit Nos. 1 and 2, located in Calvert

County, Maryland.

The proposed amendments would

revise Technical Specifications (TSs)

Section 5.0, Design Features. The

requested changes, for the most part,

adopt the improved Standard Technical

Specifications format and content for

Combustion Engineering plants

provided in NUREG–1432. Included in

the initial December 8, 1993,

application was a request to delete two

subsections of the existing TSs. These

subsections were Subsection 5.3.3,

‘‘Control Element Assemblies,’’ and

5.6.3, ‘‘Drainage.’’ Subsection 5.6.3

relates to inadvertent drainage of the

spent fuel pool. By letter dated March

2, 1995, BG&E withdrew the request to

delete these two subsections. The

existing information in Subsection 5.3.3

will be retained in a new Subsection

5.2.2 and the information in Subsection

5.6.3 will be retained in a new

Subsection 5.3.2. The new subsection

designations are necessary to be

consistent with the reformatting of the

Design Features Section of the TSs.

The Commission has previously

issued a Notice of Consideration of

Issuance of Amendments to Facility

Operating License Nos. DPR–53 and

DPR–69, Proposed No Significant

Hazards Consideration Determination

and Opportunity for a Hearing, which

was published in the Federal Register

on January 19, 1994 (59 FR 2861).

For further details with respect to this

action, see the application for

amendments dated December 8, 1993, as

supplemented on March 2, 1995. The

March 2, 1995, letter provided

clarification of the initial application

and withdrew the request to delete the

two subsections as detailed above.

These documents are available for

public inspection at the Commission’s

Public Document Room, 2120 L Street,

NW., Washington, DC, and at the local

public document room located at the

Calvert County Library, Prince

Frederick, Maryland 20678.

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 14th day

of March 1995.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Daniel G. McDonald,

Senior Project Manager, Project Directorate

I–1, Division of Reactor Projects—I/II, Office

of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.

[FR Doc. 95–6731 Filed 3–17–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590–01–M

[Docket No. 50–213]

Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power

Company; Notice of Issuance of

Amendment to Facility Operating

License

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission (Commission) has issued

Amendment No. 185 to Facility

Operating License No. DPR–61 issued to

the Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power

Company (the licensee), which revised

the Technical Specifications for

operation of the Haddam Neck Plant

located in Middlesex County,

Connecticut. The amendment is

effective as of the date of issuance to be

implemented within 30 days of

issuance.

The amendment revises the Haddam

Neck Plant Technical Specifications

(TS) to allow an increased limit for fuel

enrichment. The change allows the

storage of fuel with an enrichment not

to exceed a nominal 5.0 weight percent

(w/o) U–235 in the Haddam Neck Plant

new and spent fuel storage racks. The

current new and spent fuel storage rack

maximum nominal enrichment is 3.9 w/

o U–235 for Zircaloy clad fuel and 4.0

w/o U–235 for stainless steel clad fuel.

The application for the amendment

complies with the standards and

requirements of the Atomic Energy Act

of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the

Commission’s rules and regulations.

The Commission has made appropriate

findings as required by the Act and the

Commission’s rules and regulations in

10 CFR Chapter I, which are set forth in

the license amendment.

Notice of Consideration of Issuance of

Amendment and Opportunity for

Hearing in connection with this action

was published in the Federal Register

on June 14, 1994 (59 FR 30620). No

request for a hearing or petition for

leave to intervene was filed following

the notice.

The Commission has prepared an

Environmental Assessment related to

the action and has determined not to

prepare an environmental impact

statement. Based upon the

environmental assessment, the

Commission has concluded that the

issuance of the amendment will not

have a significant effect on the quality

of the human environment (60 FR 7798).

For further details with respect to the

action see (1) the application for

amendment dated May 17, 1994, as

supplemented September 9, 1994, and

January 31, 1995, (2) Amendment No.

185 to License No. DPR–61, (3) the

Commission’s related Safety Evaluation,

and (4) the Commission’s

Environmental Assessment. All of these

items are available for public inspection

at the Commission’s Public Document

Room, the Gelman Building, 2120 L

Street NW., Washington, DC 20555, and

at the local public document room

located at the Russell Library, 123 Broad

Street, Middletown, Connecticut 06457.

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 10th day

of March 1995.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Alan B. Wang,

Project Management, Project Directorate I–

3, Division of Reactor Projects—I/II, Office

of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.

[FR Doc. 95–6734 Filed 3–17–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590–01–M

POSTAL RATE COMMISSION

[Docket No. RM95–2]

Procedural Streamlining Inquiry;

Notice of Request for Comments on

Information Contained in Postal

Service Requests

March 15, 1995.

Before Commissioners: Edward J. Gleiman,

Chairman; W.H. ‘‘Trey’’ LeBlanc III, ViceChairman; George W. Haley; H. Edward

Quick, Jr.; Wayne A. Schley

On December 14, 1994, the

Commission issued an Advance Notice

of Proposed Rulemaking (Advance

Notice) seeking suggestions concerning

how the Commission’s rules of practice

and procedure could be amended or

supplemented to improve the efficiency

and expedition of consideration of

requests for changes in postal rates and

classifications conducted pursuant to 39

U.S.C. 3624(a). Comments were due on

or before February 21, 1995, and the

Commission has received several

thought provoking statements from

frequent participants in these cases.

Several comments emphasized the

importance of timely access to Postal