alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FILES AS
PART OF THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<CURRENCY> U.S.DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       4,911,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               33,244,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 4,300,000
<INVENTORY>                                 20,519,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            57,915,000
<PP&E>                                      14,871,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,614,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              67,243,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,289,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        86,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  52,868,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                67,243,000
<SALES>                                     46,661,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            46,661,000
<CGS>                                       36,802,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               36,802,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,662,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               252,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,314,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,553,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,761,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,761,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .31
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 57 (Friday, March 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15538]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7222]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Science Board 1995 Summer Study Task Force on Technology 
Investments for 21st Century Military Superiority, Hostile Capabilities 
Team

ACTION: Notice of advisory committee meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board 1995 Summer Study Task Force on 
Technology Investments for 21st Century Military Superiority, Hostile 
Capabilities Team will meet in closed session on April 4-5, 1995 at the 
Pentagon, Arlington, Virginia.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense through the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and 
Technology on scientific and technical matters as they affect the 
perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At this meeting the Task 
Force will focus on those R&D investments that must be made now so as 
to assure a technology base in the year 2000 capable of providing U.S. 
military superiority in the 21st century.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, P.L. No. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II, (1988)), it has 
been determined that this DSB Task Force meeting, concerns matters 
listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) (1988), and that accordingly this meeting 
will be closed to the public.

    Dated: March 20, 1995.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 95-7222 Filed 3-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of EasternAmerican Natural Gas Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely asthe successor trustee of the Trust (effective January 1, 2005), certifiespursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

 

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust at thedates and for the period presented.

 

The above certification is furnished solely pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and isnot being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.

 

 
|                 | JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.,                     |
|----------------------|------------------------------------------------|
|                 | Trustee for Eastern American Natural Gas Trust |
|                 |                                           |
|                 |                                           |
| Date: March 28, 2005 | By:                                            | /s/ Mike Ulrich |   |
|                 |                                           | Senior Vice President |
|                 |                                           | JPMorgan Chase Bank,  N.A. |

 

----
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 6, 2011

y0829 

# Order

September 6, 2011

142906

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 142906 COA: 298603 Wayne CC: 06-014173-FC DOMINIC OMARI NORMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the March 11, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### September 22, 2005
Clerk of Court UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

IVAN STAMPS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v. STATE OF COLORADO, Defendant-Appellee. No. 05-1000 (District of Colorado) (D.C. No. 04-Z-2072)

ORDER
Before BRISCOE , LUCERO , and MURPHY , Circuit Judges. On October 7, 2004, Ivan Stamps filed a complaint i n federal district court seeking to challenge the constitutionality of Color ado’s mandatory parole statute pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1983. See Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1.3-401(1)(a)(V)(E). The district court construed Stamps’ complaint as an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and dism issed it without prejudice for failure to exhaust state remedies. Stamps challeng es the characterization of his complaint and seeks to appeal its dismissal by the district court. Because we conclude that the district court properl y construed Stamps’ complaint as a § 2254 habeas corpus application, St amps cannot appeal the-2-

district court’s denial of that application until h e obtains a certificate of appealability (“COA”). See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (providing that no appea l may be taken from a final order disposing of a § 22 54 petition unless the petitioner first obtains a COA). To be entitled to a COA, Stamps must show “that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.” Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 474, 484-85 (2000) (holding that when a district court dismisses a habeas petit ion on procedural grounds, a petitioner is entitled to a COA only if he shows bo th that reasonable jurists would find it debatable whether he had stated a valid con stitutional claim and debatable whether the district court’s procedural ruling was correct). Our review of the record demonstrates that the district court’s dismi ssal of Stamps’ § 2254 application is not deserving of further proceedings or subject to a different resolution on appeal. Accordingly, this court denies Stamps a COA and dismisses this appeal. Stamps’ motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is granted . All other outstanding motions are denied
. Entered for the Court DOUGLAS E. CRESSLER, Acting Clerk of Court By Deputy Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4299 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4299

  To repeal the sunset for collateral requirements for Small Business 
                     Administration disaster loans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 24, 2022

  Mr. Kennedy introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To repeal the sunset for collateral requirements for Small Business 
                     Administration disaster loans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF SUNSET FOR COLLATERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SBA 
              DISASTER LOANS.

    Section 2102(b) of the RISE After Disaster Act of 2015 (15 U.S.C. 
636 note) is repealed.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

       CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NASB Financial, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2010, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, David H. Hancock, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.


February 9, 2011           By: /s/ David H. Hancock
                               David H. Hancock
                               Chairman and Chief
                                 Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to NASB Financial, Inc. and will be retained by NASB
Financial, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.


This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for
any other purpose.

<Page>
exh10-2.htm


 










Exhibit 10.2


(English Translation from Chinese)












Land Lease Agreement







Party A: Zhucheng City, Huanghua Town, Zupansan Village (Leaser)


Party B: Zhucheng City Ziyang Ceramics Co., Ltd (Leasee)







Due to ceramics production operation needs, Party B leased one lot of barren mountain land from Party A, after thorough consultation, the parties have agreed and signed the following agreement.







1. Land Area


Referencing to the Zhucheng City Land Planning and Design Institute’s Red Line Map, the barren mountain lot totals 203.8 Mu.







2. Lease Period


Period of lease is 50 years, from November 1, 2010 to October 31, 2060.







3. Rental Fee and Payment Method


Party B will pay Party A lease of each Mu of 60,000 RMB, totaling 12,228,000 RMB.


Party A will be responsible for payments to village households. All additional item on land shall be remove by Party A with no additional compensations.


Total of above payment amount: Twelve Million Two Hundred Twenty Eight Thousand RMB (12,228,000 RMB).


All additional items on land shall be cleared within 10 days after the signing of this Agreement, All lease payments shall be paid in full one month with in the signing of this Agreement.







4. Rights and Obligations


a. Party A shall provide convenience to Party B in regards to accessibility, drainage and electricity


b. Payments for the lands used as roads for Party B’s shall be separately consulted by the parties.


c. In the case the land is needed for national planning use, Party B shall unconditionally comply with it, all compensations for additional items on land, compensation for land use during the lease period and settlement payments shall be given to Party B.


d. After the execution of this Agreement, this Agreement shall not be changed or terminated due to the change in legal representative or the party.


e. During the term of the lease, Party A shall not request any payment of fees from Party B with any reason or excuse.







5. Any matters not covered by this Agreement shall be resolved through the parties’ consultation.







This Agreement shall have two copies in the same format, Party A and B shall each hold one copy, the Agreement is effective after signed by both Parties.







Party A: Zhucheng City, Huanghua Town, Zupansan Village


/s/ Peijing Zhang







Party B: Zhucheng city Ziyang Ceramics Co., Ltd


Legal Representative: /s/ Lingbo Chi







2010/11/1






  





  











  








Zhupansan Village Land Map










 


Total Land Area: 203.8 Mu







Survey Date: 2010/10/20
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: AVERY ARMANI,

______________________________

AVERY ARMANI,

Petitioner,

v.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF

CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES,

Respondent,

NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Real Party in Interest. No. 17

- 70244

D.C. No.

2:13

- cv

- 07058

- RSWL

- RZ

ORDER *

Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the

United States District Court for the

Central District of California

Submitted April 7, 2017 **

San Francisco, California

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as pr ovided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAY 8 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2

Before: D.W. NELSON and PAEZ, Circuit Judges, and BUCKLO, *** District

Judge.

The petition for a writ of mandamus is granted. We vacate the district

court’s January 26, 2017 order and dir ect the district court to enter judgment for

the petitioner awarding him payment of his long

- term disability benefits, interest,

attorney fees, and costs, and reinstatement of the long

- term disability policy.

The Clerk shall serve this order on the district court.

PETITION GRANTED.

*** The Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo, United States District Judge for the

Northern Distr ict of Illinois, sitting by designation.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BEYOND.COM CORPORATION FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          12,217
<SECURITIES>                                    30,382
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,062
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,092)
<INVENTORY>                                        695
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                85,624
<PP&E>                                          18,253
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,152)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 186,625
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           59,250
<BONDS>                                         63,250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       297,710
<OTHER-SE>                                   (233,629)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   186,625
<SALES>                                         30,664
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                30,664
<CGS>                                           26,574
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (582)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (20,292)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (20,292)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (20,292)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.53)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4124 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4124

To prohibit the use of Federal funds for the Disinformation Governance 
 Board of the Department of Homeland Security, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 2, 2022

 Mr. Cotton (for himself, Mr. Boozman, Mr. Cruz, Mr. Scott of Florida, 
Mr. Risch, Mr. Marshall, Mr. Crapo, Ms. Lummis, Mr. Rubio, Mr. Lee, Mr. 
 Tillis, Mrs. Hyde-Smith, Mrs. Blackburn, Ms. Ernst, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. 
  Young, Mr. Braun, and Mr. Lankford) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the use of Federal funds for the Disinformation Governance 
 Board of the Department of Homeland Security, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS FOR THE DISINFORMATION 
              GOVERNANCE BOARD OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no Federal funds may be 
used to establish or support the activities of a Disinformation 
Governance Board at the Department of Homeland Security, or any other 
similar entity established in the Department of Homeland Security.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 50 (Wednesday, March 15, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 14001]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6323]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service


Hamilton Grange National Memorial, New York County, New York; 
Final General Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement

    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act 102(2)(C) 
of 1969, the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior 
announces that a Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) has been 
prepared on the four alternatives for future management and use of 
Hamilton Grange National Memorial.
    This notice announces the availability of the FEIS for public 
review. Following a 30-day no-action period, a Record of Decision will 
be written documenting the range of alternatives considered and 
evaluated, the preferred alternative selected, and the rationale for 
its selection.
    For further inquiries about the FEIS, and requests for additional 
copies should be directed to the Superintendent, Manhattan Sites, 26 
Wall Street, New York, New York 10005 or by calling (212) 825-6992.

    Dated: March 9, 1995.
Sandy Corbett,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 95-6323 Filed 3-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BlackRock, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Laurence D. Fink, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Paul L. Audet, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|/s/ Laurence D. Fink
|--------------------
|Name:               
|Title:              
|Date:               
|                    
|/s/ Paul L. Audet   
|Name:               
|Title:              
|Date:               



This certification accompanies this
Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and should not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to BlackRock, Inc. and will be retained by BlackRock, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Tommy BRANNUM, Guardian of the Estate of George Brannum v. The Honorable James R. FRY, Judge.

No. C-7625.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Nov. 23, 1988.

Order of this court of September 14,1988 granting the motion for leave to file peti*302tion for writ of mandamus is withdrawn as the motion for leave was improvidently granted.

The motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus is overruled.