alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOTES: 

I. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS [INCHES] UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 

MENEM 

78,6 

[3.09] 

 71,4 

[2.81] 

37 

[1.46] 

46,6 

[1.83] 

7,6 

[ 30 ] 

62 

[2.44] 

[.40] 

10,1 

36 6 

[1.44] 

ISOMETRIC VIEW 

SCALE I:I 

9,9 

[ .39] 

L 

14,5 

[ . 57 ] 

This drawing is the property 

of BANNER ENGINEERING CORP. 

and is proprietary in general 

and in detail. Its contents 

shall not be revealed to 

outside parties without 

written consent of BANNER 

THIRD ANGLE PROJECTION 

411 lll 

me 

11111111111 

71111111111 

1111111111 

IEZ 

1111111111 Illlill„„00 

BANNER ENGINEERING CORP. 

P.O. BOX 9414 

MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440 

TITLE 

DIODN/DP/IN/IP/UN/UP CABLE/PIGTAIL 

WEB CAD DRAWINGS 2D/3D 

SIZE DRAWING NO 

156680 

REV. 

SCALE SHEET 1 OF I 

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 

PRO/E
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 13, 2023

No. 04-23-00043-CR

IN RE Macedonio ROJAS MENDEZ

Original Mandamus Proceeding

O R D E R

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

On January 12, 2023, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and an emergency 

motion to stay pending final resolution of the petition for writ of mandamus. This court believes 

a serious question concerning the mandamus relief sought requires further consideration. See 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(b). Respondent and real party in interest may file a response to the 

petition in this court no later than February 2, 2023. Any such response must conform to Texas 

Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4.

Relator’s emergency motion for temporary stay is GRANTED IN PART as follows: 

1. All pretrial settings requiring relator’s in-person appearance are STAYED 

pending further order from this court. Pretrial settings that do not require relator’s 

in-person appearance may proceed. 

2. The January 23, 2023 trial setting is STAYED pending further order from this 

court. 

It is so ORDERED on January 13, 2023.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:__________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ, 

 CLERK OF COURT

FILE COPY
Section 301 Investigation: China's Acts, Policies, and Practices Related to Technology 

Transfer, Intellectual Property, and Innovation - Form to Request Exclusion of Product 

When submitting a product exclusion request using this form, enter the specified 

information in the following fields and explain the basis and rationale for your statements. 

By completing this form, you certify that the information provided is complete and 

correct to the best of your knowledge. 

1. Indicate whether the comment contains business confidential information (BCI), is a public 

document, or is a public version of a BCI document. 

Public Document 

2. Please provide a complete and detailed description of the product of concern: 

Molyfoil filament assembly. Wire leads consisting of molybdenum foil used to seal into special 

ultraviolet lamps. 

3. 10-digit HTSUS item number* for product you wish to address in this product exclusion request: 

*Use numerical characters only with no special characters (example: 1023456789). For help in finding 

the HTSUS item number associated with your product, see https://hts.usitc.gov/ 

8539900000 

4. Requestor Information 

Requestor Name (Last, First): 

Organization Name: 

Ell,Kenneth 

First Light Technologies, Inc. 

Note: Representatives submitting on behalf of an organization must enter information below. 

Requestor Representative: 

5. Requestor's relationship to the product: Purchaser 

6. Does this submission in regulations.govinclude additional attachments? 

NO 

7. Please indicate whether any additional attachment contains business confidential 

information (BCI), is a public document, or is a public version of a BCI document. 

N/A 

VERSION 1 CONTINUED BELOW 1 
8. Is this product, or a comparable product, available from sources in the United States?: 

NO 

9. Is this product, or a comparable product, available from sources in third countries?: 

NO 

10. Please provide the value and quantity (with units) of the Chinese-origin product of concern 

that you purchased for each calendar year specified. Limit this figure to the products 

purchased by your firm (or by members of your trade association) alone. Please provide 

estimates if precise figures are unavailable. 

2017 Value: $485,000.00 2017 Quantity: 1,200,000 

2016 Value: $425,000.00 2016 Quantity: 1,050,000 

2015 Value: $375,000.00 2015 Quantity: 1,000,000 

11. Please provide information in support your request, taking account of the instructions 

provided in Section B of the Federal Register notice (note: text entered below can extend 

beyond the apparent size of this box). 

There is no source for this product in the U.S. or elsewhere outside of China. 

This products supports 70 direct jobs in the U.S. (Vermont). 

We are a small business and this makes our product uncompetitive against European and Chinese 

competitors in the marketplace. 

If we are forced to absorb this cost we cannot continue to operate profitably. 

This product reflects no intellectual property as it is the result of lamp manufacturing technology 

developed in the 1950s. 

VERSION 1 END 2
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3649

JLG Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
## Summary of Provisions That Would Change             the Social Security Program

- Office of the Chief Actuary
- Individual Provisions

### **Description of Proposed Provisions:              Provisions Affecting Coverage of Employment or Earnings, or Inclusion              of Other Sources of Revenue**

Printer-friendly Version
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2778

Speck Pumps-Pool Products, Inc: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions.

pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 3411

_____________________________
J EREMIAH B ENJAMIN S TANLEY , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Walton County

. Kelvin C. Wells , Judge

. October 23, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
W ETHERELL , R OWE , and W INOKUR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Robin B. Rogers, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Mycotoxin Prevention and Applied Microbiology Research: Peoria, IL
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    NCAUR homepageSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Peoria, Illinois National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research Mycotoxin Prevention and Applied Microbiology Research Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications
- MPM Home Page
- Mission Statement
- Strategic Goals
- Major Accomplishments
- Visiting Scientists

Research Projects Subjects of Investigation at this LocationEach ARS research project has related subjects of investigation.  Listed below are the subjects of investigation currently conducted at this location.
Clicking on a subject of investigation will list the research projects within that  subject of investigation.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS OF THE COMPANY AS  OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH
31, 2000 AND  IS QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO  SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         564
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               564
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 564
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          8,094
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       8,550
<OTHER-SE>                                     (16,080)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   564
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               7,721
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,721)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,721)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,721)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.00)



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 47 (Friday, March 10, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 13088]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5979]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 63

[FRL-5170-2]


Approval of Delegation of Authority; National Emission Standards 
for Hazardous Air Pollutants; Coke Oven Batteries; Utah

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA proposes to grant delegation of authority to the State of 
Utah to implement and enforce the National Emission Standards for Coke 
Oven Emissions. The Governor of Utah requested delegation from EPA 
Region VIII in a letter dated August 18, 1994. In the Final Rules 
Section of this Federal Register, EPA is approving the State of Utah's 
request for delegation as a direct final rule without prior proposal 
because EPA views this as a noncontroversial action and anticipates no 
adverse comments. EPA's rationale for the approval is set forth in the 
direct final rule. If no adverse comments are received in response to 
this proposed rule, no further activity is contemplated in relation to 
this rule. If EPA receives adverse comments, the direct final rule will 
be withdrawn and all public comments received will be addressed in a 
subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not 
institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties 
interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.

DATES: Comments on this proposed rule must be received in writing by 
April 10, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be submitted to Patricia D. Hull, 
Director, Air, Radiation & Toxics Division, Environmental Protection 
Agency, Region VIII, 999 18th Street, Suite 500, Denver, Colorado 
80202-2466 and concurrently to Russell A. Roberts, Director, Division 
of Air Quality, Department of Environmental Quality, 1950 West North 
Temple, Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-4820. Copies of State of Utah's 
submittal are available for public inspection during normal business 
hours at the above locations.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: T. Scott Whitmore at (303) 293-1758.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: See the information provided in the final 
action which is located in the Final Rules Section of this Federal 
Register.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 63

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Intergovernmental 
relations, Hazardous substances.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7412.

    Dated: February 23, 1995.
Kerrigan Clough,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region VIII.
[FR Doc. 95-5979 Filed 3-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                                    CONSENT

We have issued our reports dated February 26, 1999 accompanying the financial
statements and schedule of Daw Technologies, Inc., included in the Annual Report
of Daw Technologies, Inc., on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998. We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the
Registration Statements of Daw Technologies, Inc., on Forms S-3 (File No.
33-73292 effective January 3, 1994, File No. 33-84224 effective March 20, 1995,
File No. 33-93656 effective June 30, 1995 and file No. 333-05541 effective July
15, 1996) and on Forms S-8 (File No. 33-93206 effective June 7, 1995 and File
No. 333-03930 effective April 23, 1996).

                                        GRANT THORNTON LLP

Salt Lake City, Utah
March 26, 1999
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 22, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-60483

Summary Calendar

EUI SOO JUNG,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

--------------------

Petition for Review of an Order of

the Board of Immigration Appeals

No. A78 918 208

--------------------

Before SMITH, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Eui Soo Jung has filed a petition for review of an order of

the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) summarily dismissing his

appeal as barred by his waiver of appeal before the immigration

judge (“IJ”). Because it is plain on the record that Jung waived

his right to appeal, the BIA was authorized to dismiss his appeal

summarily without further briefing. 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(d)(2)(i)(G),
No. 05-60483

-2-

(e)(3). The BIA’s finding that Jung made no argument in his notice

of appeal challenging that waiver is conclusive, because no reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude to the contrary.

See id. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B).

Because Jung did not raise, before the BIA, a challenge to the

validity of his appeal waiver, he failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. Accordingly, this court is precluded from reviewing

his argument that the appeal waiver was not made knowingly and intelligently. See § 1252(d)(1). Similarly, we will not address

Jung’s argument, not raised before the BIA, that he was denied due

process before the IJ because he did not have representation by

counsel.

The petition for review is DENIED. Jung’s motion for stay of

removal pending resolution of the petition for review is DENIED.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 (a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
 c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants fourth fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Jack H. BrownJack H. BrownChairman of the Board, President,
and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)