alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.5
FOURTH  AMENDMENT  TO  EMPLOYMENT  AGREEMENT  between  Greg Manning and Company,
Effective as of July 1, 2000


FOURTH AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT  AGREEMENT (the "Amendment"),  made as of July 1,
2000, by and between Greg manning Auctions,  Inc., a New York corporation having
its principal office at 775 Passaic Avenue, West Caldwell, New Jersey 07006 (the
"Company"),  and Greg manning,  an individual  [address ommitted]
(the "Executive").

WHEREAS,  the Company and the  Executive  entered into an  Employment  Agreement
dated as of May 14, 1993,  as amended by an  amendment  effective as of June 30,
1995;  by a  second  amendment  effective  as of  July 1,  1997;  and by a third
amendment effective as of July 1, 1999 (as so amended, the "Agreement");

WHEREAS, the  Company and the Executive desire to amend the Agreement in certain
respects;

NOW, THEREFORE,  in consideration of the mutual promises  hereinafter set forth,
the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto,
desiring to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:

1       Paragraph 1 of the Agreement is hereby amended to extend the term of the
Agreement to June 30, 2002 (subject to earlier   termination  as provided in the
Agreement).

2.      Paragraph  3(a) of  the  Agreement is hereby amended to delete the first
sentence thereof and insert in lieu thereof the following:

(a)      For the full, prompt and faithful  performance of all of his duties and
         services hereunder,  the Company shall pay the Executive an annual base
         salary of $350,000 per year for the period of his employment hereunder.

3.       Paragraph 3(b)(I) is hereby amended by adding  the following at the end
          thereof:

     Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Executive shall be entitled to receive a
bonus of not less than $50,000 per year.

4.  All capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have their
respective meanings as set forth in the Agreement.

5.       This Amendment shall be effective for all purposes as of July  1, 2000.
Except as hereby amended, all the terms and   conditions  of the Agreement shall
remain in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the parties  hereto have executed this Amendment as of the
date first above written.

GREG MANNING AUCTIONS, INC.

BY:___/s/ Greg Manning______
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4125

Tianhai Electric North America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3213

Nestle Waters North America:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BlackRock, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Laurence D. Fink, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Paul L. Audet, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Laurence D. Fink
|Name:                |  | Laurence D. Fink       
|Title:               |  | Chief Executive Officer
|Date:                |  | August 5, 2005         
|                    
|/s/ Paul L. Audet   
|Name:                |  | Paul L. Audet          
|Title:               |  | Chief Financial Officer
|Date:                |  | August 5, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 25 (Monday, February 8, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 6525]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02316]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, And Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel; Grant Review for NHLBI K Award Recipients.
    Date: March 1, 2016.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Bethesda Marriott Suites, 6711 Democracy Boulevard, 
Bethesda, MD 20817.
    Contact Person: Melissa E Nagelin, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA National Heart, Lung, and 
Blood Institute 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7202, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
301-435-0297, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5f313e383a33363132376d1f3137333d367131363771383029"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="214f4046444d484f4c4913614f494d43480f4f48490f464e57">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 2, 2016.
Michelle Trout,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016-02316 Filed 2-5-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4282

Scosche Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 54 (Tuesday, March 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14957-14958]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6828]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration


Supplemental Awards for Addiction Training Centers Grantees

AGENCY: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, Substance Abuse and 
Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), HHS.

ACTION: Availability of supplemental funds for currently funded 
grantees in the Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT) addiction 
training centers cooperative agreement program.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice is to inform the public that CSAT is making 
available approximately $1.7 million for supplemental awards in fiscal 
year 1995 to existing grantees in its Addiction Training Centers (ATCs) 
program. Competition is being limited to the eleven currently funded 
ATCs because their unique training infrastructure is well established 
and will permit the additional activities described below to 
[[Page 14958]] be implemented quickly and within the available funding. 
Supplemental awards will be made based on the receipt of satisfactory 
applications that are approved by a peer review group and the CSAT 
National Advisory Council.
    Approximately $550,000 is available for up to four supplemental 
awards to ATCs for geographic expansion to broaden the geographic areas 
covered by existing ATCs. Applications are invited for the expansion of 
an ATC into a minimum of one additional contiguous State to provide 
addictions training and financial support for addiction counselors and 
a minimum of one other health or allied health care discipline.
    Approximately $1.2 million is available for up to four supplemental 
awards to ATCs for criminal justice training. Applications are invited 
for the delivery of cross-training for probation, parole, corrections 
and public health/mental health/addictions treatment personnel. 
Applicants must agree to provide training for a region of two or more 
contiguous States.

    Authority: Supplemental awards will be made under authority of 
Section 512(a) of the Public Health Service Act, as amended (42 USC 
290bb-5).

    The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number for 
this program is 93.131.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Edward T. Morgan, Office of Scientific 
Analysis and Evaluation, CSAT, Rockwall II Building, Suite 618, 5600 
Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland 20857; Telephone: (301) 443-8831.

    Dated: March 14, 1995.
Richard Kopanda,
Acting Executive Officer, SAMHSA.
[FR Doc. 95-6828 Filed 3-20-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       6,631,314
<SECURITIES>                                24,254,455
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            31,719,774
<PP&E>                                       4,656,851
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,980,386
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              34,681,497
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,969,082
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,101
<OTHER-SE>                                  31,347,462
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                34,681,497
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,867,654
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            13,412,247
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              81,706
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (9,927,775)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (9,927,775)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (9,927,775)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.76)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.76)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Petrohawk EnergyCorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), eachof the undersigned officers of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)                                                      The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                                      The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| By:    |                                                                        | /s/ Floyd C. Wilson  |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|--------|
|   | Floyd  C. Wilson                                                            |
|   | President, Chief Executive  Officer and  Chairman of the Board of Directors |
|   | November 15,  2004                                                          |
|   |                                                                        |
| By:    |                                                                        | /s/ Shane M. Bayless |   |
|   | Shane  M. Bayless                                                           |
|   | Vice President, Chief Financial  Officerand Treasurer                       |
|   | November 15,  2004                                                          |

 

----
1

The Honorable Scott O. Wright, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 06-1434

___________

Sid Brown, Jr., *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Missouri.

John Page, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: June 27, 2007

Filed: July 9, 2007

___________

Before RILEY, MAGILL, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Sid Brown, Jr. (Brown), a Missouri inmate, appeals the district court’s1

 adverse

grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate

indifference to his medical needs while he was a pretrial detainee. After de novo

review, see Beck v. Skon, 253 F.3d 330, 332-33 (8th Cir. 2001) (standard of review),

we conclude that the grant of summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by

the district court. Brown’s argument that his appointed counsel below provided

ineffective assistance is not a basis for reversal. See Glick v. Henderson, 855 F.2d
-2-

536, 541 (8th Cir. 1988) (stating the remedy for ineffective assistance of appointed

counsel in civil action is legal malpractice suit). Thus, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R.

47B. In addition, Brown’s pending motion for appointment of appellate counsel is

denied.

______________________________
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Freeman, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Owens, J.), rendered June 29, 1988, convicting him of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed

The defendant’s contention that the verdict sheet submitted to the jury was not proper is not preserved for appellate review since he failed to object to its submission *(see,*CPL *705470.05 [2]; *People v Wilkerson,*162 AD2d 568; *People v Braithwaithe,*154 AD2d 543; *People v Bey-Cruz,*152 AD2d 756; *People v Jusino,*152 AD2d 744; *cf., People v Nimmons,*72 NY2d 830); and we decline to review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt *(see, People v Wilkerson, supra; People v Mathis,*150 AD2d 613; *People v Lugo,*150 AD2d 502; *cf., People v Carballo,*158 AD2d 701).

The defendant’s remaining contentions do not require reversal. Brown, J. P., Kooper, Eiber and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 48 (Monday, March 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13425-13426]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6023]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

DOE Response to Recommendation 94-3 of the Defense Nuclear 
Facilities Safety Board, Rocky Flats Seismic and Systems Safety

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board published 
Recommendation 94-3, concerning Rocky Flats Seismic and Systems Safety, 
in the Federal Register on October 4, 1994 (59 FR 50581). Section 
315(e) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 2286d(e) 
requires the Department of Energy to transmit an implementation plan to 
the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board by February 25, 1995, or 
submit a notification of extension for an additional 45 days. The 
Secretary's notification of extension for an additional 45-days 
follows.

ADDRESSES: Send comments, data, views, or arguments concerning the 
Secretary's notification to: Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, 
625 Indiana Avenue NW., Suite 700, Washington, DC 20004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Thomas P. Grumbly, Assistant Secretary for Environmental 
Management, Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., 
Washington, DC 20585.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on February 24, 1995.
Mark B. Whitaker,
Departmental Representative to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety 
Board.
The Honorable John T. Conway,
Chairman, Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, 625 Indiana 
Avenue NW., Suite 700, Washington, DC 20004 [[Page 13426]] 
    Dear Mr. Conway: This is to advise you, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 
2286d(e), that the Department of Energy will require an additional 
45 days to respond to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board 
Recommendation 94-3, regarding seismic and systems safety at the 
Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site.
    The Department recently made some management changes at the 
Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site. Because of these changes, 
and the need for the development of acceptance criteria for safety 
adequacy and systems for identifying facility upgrades, more time is 
necessary to respond. In addition, the Department believes that it 
is necessary to integrate its response to Recommendation 94-3 with 
Recommendation 90-5, (Systematic Evaluation Program). The 
Implementation Plan for Recommendation 94-3 will be provided to the 
Board by April 10, 1995.

        Sincerely,
Hazel R. O'Leary.
[FR Doc. 95-6023 Filed 3-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-M
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 3150

_____________________________ S AMANTHA S ARKA , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Columbia County

. Leandra G. Johnson , Judge

. June 11, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. R AY , B ILBREY , and J AY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, fo r Appellee.