alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from Form 10-Q
for the  twenty-six  week Period  ended March 28, 1999 and is  qualified  in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-26-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 SEP-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-28-1999
<CASH>                                               6,508
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      117,889
<ALLOWANCES>                                         2,396
<INVENTORY>                                        170,094
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   338,672
<PP&E>                                             477,080
<DEPRECIATION>                                      65,889
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     921,692
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              188,851
<BONDS>                                            627,899
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               33,809
<PREFERRED>                                         15,000
<COMMON>                                             2,189
<OTHER-SE>                                          (3,481)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       921,692
<SALES>                                            526,253
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   526,253
<CGS>                                              472,737
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      472,737
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       162
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  33,186
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (28,572)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (10,818)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (16,506)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (16,506)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-11686

Mascon, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
#### BASSETT LUMBER COMPANY v. W. M. RHYNE.

(Filed 15 December, 1926.)

Judgments — Default-—Mechanics’ Lien — Judgment Set Aside — Statutes— Meritorious Defense.

A judgment by default final in favor of material furnishers, etc., for a building erected on tbe lands of a nonresident owner, by service of summons by publication, may be set aside upon defendant’s motion made in two days after be bad notice of tbe pendency of tbe action, upon a finding of a meritorious defense. C. S., 492. *Burton v. Smith,,*191 N. C., 599, and other cases, cited as controlling.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Lyon, J.,*at March Term, 1926, of MeCK-LENBURG. ' ’

Civil action instituted by plaintiff, a resident of Mecklenburg County, against the defendant, a nonresident of the State, to enforce a lien for materials furnished and used in the erection of a dwelling-house on a lot of land situate in Mecklenburg County and belonging to the defend*736ant at tbe time, but which was subsequently sold, by full warranty deed, to other parties. Service of summons was obtained by publication, and judgment by default final, for want of an answer, was entered 23 November, 1925. Execution having issued, the property was duly sold by the sheriff. On 22 March, 1926, two days after the defendant was first notified of the pendency of this action and what had taken place in consequence thereof, a motion was duly filed under O. S., 492 to set aside the judgment and for leave to come in and defend in said action. His Honor allowed the motion after finding that the defendant has a good and meritorious defense, and that the successful bidder at the sheriff’s sale under the execution was not a purchaser in good faith. From this order the plaintiff appeals.

*J. L. DeLaney for plaintiff.*

*G. T. Carswell and Joe W. Ervin for defendant.*

Stacy, 0. J.,

after stating the case: The judgment must be affirmed on authority of *Burton v. Smith,*191 N. C., 599, and *Rogers v. Piland,*178 N. C., 70. It would only be a work of supererogation to state again what has so recently been said in these cases. See, also, *Foster v. Allison Corp.,*191 N. C., 166, and *Miller v. Dunn,*188 N. C., 400.

Affirmed.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3571

Scosche Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Form of Amd 1 to the Aleris Corp 2010 Equity Incentive Plan Director RSU



 Exhibit 10.25.1 

ALERIS CORPORATION 
 2010 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN 
 Form of 

AMENDMENT 1 TO THE 
 RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARD AGREEMENT 
 , 2011 

 

			
	 TO:
	  	
		
	 FROM:
	  	Aleris Corporation (formerly “Aleris Holding Company”)
		
	 Re:
	  	Amendment 1 to Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement

 On [    ], 2010, you were granted Restricted Stock Units of Aleris Corporation (the
“Company”) pursuant to an Award Agreement issued under the Company’s 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). 

In light of the Company becoming a public company, we have amended, restated and renamed the Plan as the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan and we have mutually
agreed to amend the terms of your Award Agreement, effective immediately prior to the effectiveness of a 2011 initial public offering of the Company (the “IPO), as follows: 

 

	1.	Section 2. Settlement. The last two sentences of Section 2 will be deleted. 


 

	2.	Section 3. Early Termination of the Restricted Stock Units. The reference to Plan Section 11 is amended to Plan Section 12.


  

	3.	Section 4. Company Call Right. Section 4 is deleted. 

  

	4.	Section 5. Restricted Stock Units Subject to Plan and Stockholders Agreement. Section 5 is amended to change the heading to read Restricted Stock Units
Subject to Plan and to amend Sections 5 (a) and (b) to read as follows:  

  

	 	(a)	Participant Acknowledgements. By entering into this Award Agreement, you agree and acknowledge that (i) the Restricted Stock Units are subject in all
respects to the Plan; (ii) the Restricted Stock Units are subject to Plan provisions under which, in certain circumstances, the Committee may terminate your Restricted Stock Units and/or make adjustments to the kind and/or number of shares or
property underlying the Restricted Stock Units; and (iii) the Committee has discretion to interpret and administer the Plan and this Award Agreement and its judgments made in accordance with the Plan are final. 


 

	 	(b)	Conflicts. In the event of a conflict between any term or provision contained herein and a term or provision of the Plan, the term or provision contained in the
Plan shall control. 

  
 8166957.1









	5.	Sections (a) and (f) of the Participant Acknowledgments are deleted. 


 

	6.	Effective Date of this Amendment. This Amendment 1 is effective immediately prior to the effectiveness of the IPO. 


 

	7.	Continued Terms of Restricted Stock Units. Except as otherwise amended in this Agreement, your restricted stock units remain subject in all respects to the terms
and conditions of the Award Agreement and the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan and you acknowledge that a copy of the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan has been provided to you. 

 Please indicate your acceptance of this Amendment to the Award Agreement with respect to your Restricted Stock Units by signing and returning a copy of this Amendment to the address set forth below as
soon as practicable. 
  

	
	Sincerely,
	
	  
	Christopher R. Clegg
	Executive Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary
	
	Agreed to and Accepted by:
	
	  


  
 2 


 8166957.1
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

October 24, 2011 

p1017 

Order 

 

October 24, 2011 

143464 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 14 3464 

 COA: 303825 

 Roscommon CC: 10-006079-FC 

GARD ANTHONY VERBEKE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 8, 2011 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-1871

Steelite International USA, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Jimmy BALENTINE, Defendant/Appellant.

No. 68997.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Sept. 3, 1996.

Robert E. Steele, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for defendant/appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Cheryl A. Caponegro, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintifPresp ondent.

Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHAEtD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this jury-tried case, Defendant appeals after his conviction of burglary in the second degree, § 569.170.1 The trial court sentenced Defendant as a prior and persistent offender, §§ 558.016 and 558.019, to ten years’ imprisonment. Defendant alleges the trial court erred in denying his motion for acquittal. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have *17been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursu-ant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. All cites are to RSMo 1994.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4315 

To address the foreign production of precursor chemicals that are used 

for the illicit production of narcotics and psychotropic drugs and other 

controlled substances, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 26, 2022 

Mr. CORNYN (for himself, Mr. CARDIN, and Mr. HAGERTY) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To address the foreign production of precursor chemicals 

that are used for the illicit production of narcotics and 

psychotropic drugs and other controlled substances, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting America 

5 from Narcotics and Illicit Chemicals Act of 2022’’ or the 

6 ‘‘PANIC Act of 2022’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4315 IS

1 SEC. 2. MODIFIED DEFINITION OF MAJOR ILLICIT DRUG 

2 PRODUCING COUNTRY. 

3 Section 481(e)(2) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 

4 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2291(e)(2)) is amended— 

5 (1) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘; or’’ and 

6 inserting a semicolon; 

7 (2) in subparagraph (D), by inserting ‘‘or’’ 

8 after the semicolon; and 

9 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub10 paragraph: 

11 ‘‘(E) that is a direct source of covered syn12 thetic drugs or psychotropic drugs or other con13 trolled substances, including precursor chemi14 cals, when those precursor chemicals are used 

15 in the production of such drugs and substances, 

16 significantly affecting the United States;’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-3927

ECM Industries LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3160

Viavi Solutions Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   46,080
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (1,589)
<INVENTORY>                                     13,607
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                65,401
<PP&E>                                         100,262
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,916
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 247,441
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,578
<BONDS>                                        130,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,467
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             8
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,118
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   247,441
<SALES>                                         56,378
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                56,378
<CGS>                                           40,763
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   50,671
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   287
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   140
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,674
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,320
<INCOME-TAX>                                       567
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                753
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       753
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.09
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1





                                  EXHIBIT 10.4

           EXTENSION AND RATIFICATION OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN LIVING
             CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC. AND LEROY D. WILLIAMS


<PAGE>   2





                                        December 13, 1996



Mr. Leroy D. Williams
15415 Katy Freeway, Suite 800
Houston, Texas 77094

     Re: Extension and Ratification of Employment Agreement

Dear Mr. Williams:

     As you are aware, Living Centers of America, Inc. ("Company") has agreed
to ratify and extend the Employment Agreement between you and the Company
effective as of January 1, 1993 and to give effect to the automatic extension
therein so that term of employment is extended until January 1, 2000. If the
foregoing is agreeable to you, please sign this letter in the space indicated
below.


                                    Very truly yours,

                                    LIVING CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC.


                                    By /s/ Edward L. Kuntz
                                      ------------------------------------------

                                    Name: Edward L. Kuntz
                                         ---------------------------------------

                                    Title: Chief Operating Officer and President
                                          --------------------------------------


AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:

/s/ Leroy D. Williams      
-------------------------
Leroy D. Williams