alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 7 (Wednesday, January 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 2809]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-618]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Departmental Offices


Debt Management Advisory Committee; Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. App. section 10(a)(2), 
that a meeting will be held at the U.S. Treasury Department, 15th and 
Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C., on January 31 and February 
1, 1995, of the following debt management advisory committee:

Public Securities Association
Treasury Borrowing Advisory Committee

    The agenda for the meeting provides for a technical background 
briefing by Treasury staff on January 31, followed by a charge by the 
Secretary of the Treasury or his designate that the committee discuss 
particular issues, and a working session. On February 1, the committee 
will present a written report of its recommendations.
    The background briefing by Treasury staff will be held at 11:30 
a.m. Eastern time on January 31 and will be open to the public. The 
remaining sessions on January 31 and the committee's reporting session 
on February 1 will be closed to the public, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. App. 
section 10(d).
    This notice shall constitute my determination, pursuant to the 
authority placed in heads of departments by 5 U.S.C. App. section 10(d) 
and vested in me by Treasury Department Order No. 101-05, that the 
closed portions of the meeting are concerned with information that is 
exempt from disclosure under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(A). The public 
interest requires that such meetings be closed to the public because 
the Treasury Department requires frank and full advice from 
representatives of the financial community prior to making its final 
decision on major financing operations. Historically, this advice has 
been offered by debt management advisory committees established by the 
several major segments of the financial community. When so utilized, 
such a committee is recognized to be an advisory committee under 5 
U.S.C. App. section 3.
    Although the Treasury's final announcement of financing plans may 
not reflect the recommendations provided in reports of the advisory 
committee, premature disclosure of the committee's deliberations and 
reports would be likely to lead to significant financial speculation in 
the securities market. Thus, these meetings fall within the exemption 
covered by 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(A).
    The Office of the Under Secretary for Domestic Finance is 
responsible for maintaining records of debt management advisory 
committee meetings and for providing annual reports setting forth a 
summary of committees activities and such other matters as may be 
informative to the public consistent with the policy of 5 U.S.C. 552b.

    Dated: January 4, 1995
Frank N. Newman,
(Acting) Secretary of the Treasury.
[FR Doc. 95-618 Filed 1-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-25-M
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4323 

To amend the Indian Health Care Improvement Act to establish an urban 

Indian organization confer policy for the Department of Health and 

Human Services. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 26, 2022 

Ms. SMITH (for herself and Mr. LANKFORD) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Indian Health Care Improvement Act to establish an urban Indian organization confer policy for the 

Department of Health and Human Services. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Urban Indian Health 

5 Confer Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. URBAN INDIAN ORGANIZATION CONFER POLICY. 

7 Section 514(b) of the Indian Health Care Improve8 ment Act (25 U.S.C. 1660d(b)) is amended to read as fol9 lows: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4323 IS

1 ‘‘(b) REQUIREMENT.—The Secretary shall ensure 

2 that the Service and the other agencies and offices of the 

3 Department confer, to the maximum extent practicable, 

4 with urban Indian organizations in carrying out— 

5 ‘‘(1) this Act; and 

6 ‘‘(2) other provisions of law relating to Indian 

7 health care.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4066

SPM Flow Control, Inc. DBA Weir SPM:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 53 (Monday, March 20, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 14734]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6821]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Business Development Center Applications: Cincinnati, OH

AGENCY: Minority Business Development Agency, Commerce.

ACTION: Cancellation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Minority Business Development Agency is cancelling the 
announcement to solicit competitive applications under its Minority 
Business Development Center (MBDC) Program to operate the Cincinnati, 
Ohio MBDC. This solicitation was originally published in the Federal 
Register, Friday, March 3, 1995, Vol. 60, No. 42, 11955.

11.800  Minority Business Development Center

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance)

    Dated: March 13, 1995.
Donald L. Powers,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, Minority Business Development Agency.
[FR Doc. 95-6821 Filed 3-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-21-P
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 7 (Wednesday, January 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 2739]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-691]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

U.S. Geological Survey, Notice of Decision on Application for 
Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instrument

    This decision is made pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, 
Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-
651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be viewed 
between 8:30 AM and 5:00 PM in Room 4211, U.S. Department of Commerce, 
14th and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C.
    Docket Number: 94-124. Applicant: U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, 
CO 80225. Instrument: Open Split Interface Attachment for Mass 
Spectrometer. Manufacturer: Finnigan MAT, Germany. Intended Use: See 
notice at 59 FR 59212, November 16, 1994.
    Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of 
equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such 
purposes as it is intended to be used, is being manufactured in the 
United States. Reasons: This is a compatible accessory for an 
instrument previously imported for the use of the applicant. The 
accessory is pertinent to the intended uses and we know of no domestic 
accessory which can be readily adapted to the previously imported 
instrument.


Pamela Woods,
Acting Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff.
[FR Doc. 95-691 Filed 1-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-F
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                   [WIPFLI ULLRICH BERTELSON LLP LETTERHEAD]


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT


Board of Directors and Stockholders
Tufco Technologies, Inc.
Green Bay, Wisconsin

We have audited the consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity,
and cash flows of Tufco Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries for the year ended
September 30, 1995. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the results of operations and cash flows of
Tufco Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries for the year ended September 30, 1995
in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

                                          /s/ WIPFLI ULLRICH BERTELSON LLP   
                                          -----------------------------------
                                          Wipfli Ullrich Bertelson LLP

November 9, 1995
Green Bay, Wisconsin
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-60800 Conference Calendar

TROBY D. BENSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus KIRK FORDICE, ET AL., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 2:95-CV-141-PG

- - - - - - - - - - December 10, 1998 Before DAVIS, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Troby D. Benson, Mississippi prisoner # 45675A, appeals the district court’s 28 U.S.C. § 1915A dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Benson argues that the district court abused its discretion in summarily dismissing his complaint because the court failed to entertain his valid theory of recovery under the Constitution. He argues that he stated a claim of malicious prosecution with regard to the burglary charge, that such a claim is not barred by Heck v. Humphrey , 512 U.S. 477 (1994), that the defendants are not immune, and that the statute of limitationsNo. 97-60800 -2- was tolled by the defendants’ actions in fraudulently concealing the facts underlying his action. The facts underlying his claims are set forth in the Mississippi Supreme Court opinion affirming his conviction. Benson v. State , 551 So. 2d 188 (Miss. 1989). Benson was convicted for the acts for which he was arrested and for which he was detained for those four months prior to his indictment on the robbery charge. His challenge to the existence of probable cause to detain him during that time until the grand jury returned an indictment would implicate the validity of his conviction. See Heck , 512 U.S. at 486-87. The district court did not err in dismissing Benson’s complaint as frivolous pursuant to § 1915A. See Ruiz v. United States , F.3d (5th Cir. Nov. 20, 1998, No. 97-20950). Benson’ appeal is without arguable merit and is frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is dismissed. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. We caution Benson that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Benson is cautioned further to review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous. APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS.
#### STATE v. WAYNE BEUFORD RODDY.

(Filed 16 December, 1959.)

Appeal by defendant from *Preyer, J.,*at April 1959 Term, of Surry.

Criminal prosecution upon -a bill of indictment charging murder in the first degree of one Bobby Jarrell.

Plea:. Not guilty.

.Verdict: Guilty — Manslaughter.

Judgment: Confinement in Central Prison for a period of not .less than three nor more than six years. .;

Defendant excepts and appeals to Supreme Court-, and assigns error.

*Attorney General Seawell, Assistant Attorney General Harry W. McGalliard for' the State.*

*Barber & Gardner for defendant, appellant.*

Per Curiam.

While defendant presents on this appeal several assignments of error based upon exceptions to admission and ¡to exclusion. of matters of evidence, a careful consideration of them fails to reveal prejudicial error. Hence in the judgment from which appeal, is taken there is ....... , , .,. .;...

No error.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 13, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3761

Cummins Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**In connection with the Annual Report of General GrowthProperties, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-K for theperiod ending December 31, 2005, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Bernard Freibaum, in my capacity asChief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities    Exchange Act of 1934; and           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Company.     /s/ Bernard Freibaum           Bernard Freibaum *Chief Financial Officer*March 31, 2006
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 27, 2020

a1019

Order 

Clerk

October 27, 2020

156913(137)

RUTH JARRETT-COOPER, a/k/a RUTH 

JARRETT, a/k/a RUTH COOPER, and 

EXCLUSIVE EVENTS & ACCOMODATIONS,

LLC,

Plaintiffs-Appellants/

Cross-Appellees,

and

BRYON TRICE, DELICIA JACKSON, URBAN

PLAYS, and ANGELA BARROW,

Plaintiffs,

v SC: 156913

COA: 331383

Oakland CC: 2011-121175-CZ

UNITED AIRLINES, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee/

Cross-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s July 27, 2018 

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that reconsideration 

of our previous order is warranted. MCR 7.311(G).
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 50 (Wednesday, March 15, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 13970]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6384]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Office of Arms Control and Nonproliferation; Proposed Subsequent 
Arrangement

    Pursuant to Section 131 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as 
amended (42 U.S.C. 2160), notice is hereby given of a proposed 
``subsequent arrangement'' under the Agreement for Cooperation between 
the Government of the United States of America and the Government of 
Switzerland concerning Civil Uses of Atomic Energy, as amended, and the 
Additional Agreement for Cooperation between the Government of the 
United States of America and the European Atomic Energy Community 
(EURATOM) concerning Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy, as amended.
    The subsequent arrangement to be carried out under the above-
mentioned agreements involves approval for the transfer of 315 
kilograms of fissile plutonium from the reprocessing site in France to 
either the Siemens facility in Hanau, the Federal Republic of Germany, 
the Compagnie Generale des Matieres Nucleaires (COGEMA) in France or 
the British Nuclear Fuels, plc in the United Kingdom. The plutonium 
will be used for fabrication of mixed plutonium-uranium oxide fuel for 
use in power reactors within the European Community.
    In accordance with Section 131 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as 
amended, it has been determined that this subsequent arrangement will 
not be inimical to the common defense and security.
    This subsequent arrangement will take effect no sooner than fifteen 
days after the date of publication of this notice and after fifteen 
days of continuous session of the Congress, beginning the day after the 
date on which the reports required by section 131(b)(1) of the Atomic 
Energy Act of 1954, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2160), are submitted to the 
Committee on International Relations of the House of Representatives 
and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate. The two time 
periods referred to above may run concurrently.

    Issued in Washington, D.C., on March 8, 1995.
Edward T. Fei,
Acting Director, Division of International and Regional Security, 
Office of Arms Control and Nonproliferation.
[FR Doc. 95-6384 Filed 3-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-M
exhibit10a.htm
















Exhibit 10(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 12 to the Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-141758) pertaining to Lincoln Life & Annuity Variable Annuity Account H, which is incorporated by reference into Post-Effective Amendment No. 13, and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) April 1, 2011, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York and (b) April 6, 2011, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Variable Annuity Account H.


 


                                              /s/ Ernst & Young LLP







Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


June 20, 2011
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 54 (Tuesday, March 21, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 15001]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7086]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

date: March 29-31, 1995.

place: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 
(``Federal Circuit''), Courtroom No. 1, 717 Madison Place, N.W., 
Washington, D.C.; and Room 6005, 1730 K Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.

status: Open and Closed.

matters to be considered: The Commission will hear oral argument on the 
following matter in open session at Federal Circuit in accordance with 
the schedule and division of issues set forth below:

    In Re: Contents of Respirable Dust Sample Alteration Citations, 
and Keystone Coal Mining Corp., Master Docket No. 91-1 and Docket 
Nos. PENN 91-451-R, etc. (issues include whether the judge erred in 
his framing of the Secretary's burden of proof and in finding that 
the Secretary failed to carry his burden of proving that the weight 
of 75 cited filters from the Urling No. 1 Mine was intentionally 
altered by Keystone Coal Mining Corp.)

Wednesday, March 29, 1995

    Oral argument will begin at 9:30 a.m. at the Federal Circuit 
addressing the issues of Burden of Proof and Scientific Evidence.
    An afternoon session of oral argument will begin at 2:00 p.m. at 
the Federal Circuit addressing the issues of Statistical Evidence, 
Credibility Resolutions and Exclusion of Evidence of Criminal 
Tampering in Other Cases.
    Following oral argument, the Commission will consider this 
matter in Room 6005, 1730 K Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. This 
meeting will be closed pursuant to 5 U.S.C. Sec. 552b(c)(10).

Thursday, March 30, 1995

    Oral argument will begin at 10:00 a.m. at the Federal Circuit 
and will cover issues not previously addressed.
    At the completion of the morning session, the Commission will 
determine whether an afternoon session will be necessary. If further 
argument is deemed necessary, the session shall commence at 2:00 
p.m. at the Federal Circuit.
    Following oral argument, the Commission will consider and act 
upon this matter in Room 6005, 1730 K Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 
This meeting will be closed pursuant to 5 U.S.C. Sec. 552b(c)(10).

Friday, March 31, 1995

    At 10:00 a.m., the Commission will consider and act upon this 
matter at Room 6005, 1730 K Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. This 
meeting will be closed pursuant to 5 U.S.C. Sec. 552b(c)(10).

contact person for more information: Jean Ellen (202) 653-5629/(202) 
708-9300 for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

    Dated: March 15, 1995.
Jean H. Ellen,
Chief of Docket Clerk.
[FR Doc. 95-7086 Filed 3-17-95; 3:43 pm]
BILLING CODE 6735-01-M