13974 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 50 / Wednesday, March 15, 1995 / Notices

1See 34 FPC 452 (1965).

Texas 77002, filed in Docket No. CP95–

241–000 a request pursuant to Sections

157.205 and 157.216 of the

Commission’s Regulations under the

Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205 and

157.216) for permission and approval to

abandon and remove a meter station and

any related appurtenant facilities,

located in San Patricio County, Texas.

FGT makes such request, under its

blanket certificate issued in Docket No.

CP82–553–000 pursuant to Section 7 of

the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set

forth in the request that is on file with

the Commission and open to public

inspection.

FGT states that it is proposing to

abandon facilities which once served as

a point of measurement for natural gas

which bypassed the Warren processing

plant. It is stated that the Warren plant

has not been used for some time and is

not expected to be used in the future.

The estimated cost of removal is

$15,800 with an estimated salvage value

of $15,825.

It is averred that the proposed activity

is not prohibited by FGT’s existing tariff

and that it has sufficient capacity to

continue all services without detriment

or disadvantage to FGT’s firm

customers.

Comment date: April 24, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph G

at the end of this notice.

6. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company

[Docket No. CP95–242–000]

Take notice that on March 3, 1995,

Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company

(Tennessee), P.O. Box 2511, Houston,

Texas 77252, filed in Docket No. CP95–

242–000 a request pursuant to Sections

157.205 and 157.212 of the

Commission’s Regulations under the

Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205,

157.212) for authorization to establish a

new delivery point under Tennessee’s

blanket certificate issued in Docket No.

CP82–413–000 pursuant to Section 7 of

the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set

forth in the request that is on file with

the Commission and open to public

inspection.

Tennessee proposes to establish an

additional delivery point in order to

properly meter expanded volumes of up

to 6,000 Dekatherms per day for Central

Gas Company (Central Gas), a subsidiary

of Alabama-Tennessee Natural Gas

Company. Tennessee states that it

would install a 3-inch meter and

associated piping adjacent to an existing

delivery meter (Meter No. 2–0431)

located at M.P. 554–1+1.10 on the 500–

1 Line and M.P. 554–3+1.10 on the 500–

3 Line in Lauderdale County, Alabama. 1

Tennessee explains that the additional

meter is necessary to handle gas

measurement on peak days. Tennessee

further states that while the increased

deliveries of gas to Central Gas would be

through release capacity, IT, or

authorized overruns, the total quantities

to be delivered for Central Gas’ account

after establishment of the new delivery

meter would not exceed the total

quantities authorized prior to this

request. Tennessee states that it would

be reimbursed for the cost of the project,

estimated to be $27,446.

Comment date: April 24, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph G

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs

F. Any person desiring to be heard or

to make any protest with reference to

said application should on or before the

comment date, file with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission,

Washington, D.C. 20426, a motion to

intervene or a protest in accordance

with the requirements of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211)

and the Regulations under the Natural

Gas Act (18 CFR 157.10). All protests

filed with the Commission will be

considered by it in determining the

appropriate action to be taken but will

not serve to make the protestants parties

to the proceeding. Any person wishing

to become a party to a proceeding or to

participate as a party in any hearing

therein must file a motion to intervene

in accordance with the Commission’s

Rules.

Take further notice that, pursuant to

the authority contained in and subject to

the jurisdiction conferred upon the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

by Sections 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas

Act and the Commission’s Rules of

Practice and Procedure, a hearing will

be held without further notice before the

Commission or its designee on this

application if no motion to intervene is

filed within the time required herein, if

the Commission on its own review of

the matter finds that a grant of the

certificate and/or permission and

approval for the proposed abandonment

are required by the public convenience

and necessity. If a motion for leave to

intervene is timely filed, or if the

Commission on its own motion believes

that a formal hearing is required, further

notice of such hearing will be duly

given.

Under the procedure herein provided

for, unless otherwise advised, it will be

unnecessary for applicant to appear or

be represented at the hearing.

G. Any person or the Commission’s

staff may, within 45 days after issuance

of the instant notice by the Commission,

file pursuant to Rule 214 of the

Commission’s Procedural Rules (18 CFR

385.214) a motion to intervene or notice

of intervention and pursuant to Section

157.205 of the Regulations under the

Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a

protest to the request. If no protest is

filed within the time allowed therefor,

the proposed activity shall be deemed to

be authorized effective the day after the

time allowed for filing a protest. If a

protest is filed and not withdrawn

within 30 days after the time allowed

for filing a protest, the instant request

shall be treated as an application for

authorization pursuant to Section 7 of

the Natural Gas Act.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–6310 Filed 3–14–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

[Docket No. CP95–237–000]

Greeley Gas Company; Application for

Service Area Determination

March 9, 1995.

Take notice that on March 2, 1995,

Greeley Gas Company (Greeley), a

Division of Atmos Energy Corporation,

Three Lincoln Centre, 5430 LBJ

Freeway, Dallas, Texas 75265, filed in

Docket No. CP95–237–000, an

application pursuant to Section 7(f) of

the Natural Gas Act (NGA) for a service

area determination for its Lamar System

in the states of Colorado and Kansas, all

as more fully set forth in the application

which is on file with the Commission

and open to public inspection.

Greeley states that its Lamar System

serves consumers in approximately six

towns in southwest Kansas and 16

towns in southeast Colorado, as well as

certain irrigation customers and right-ofway grantors. Greeley submits that grant

of this application would assist Greeley

to maximize gas cost benefits and

enhance supply options for its Lamar

System customers.

Greeley asserts its Lamar System

meets the Commission’s criteria for

granting a service area determination.

Greeley states the following: All of its

sales are regulated by either the

Colorado or the Kansas public service

commission; there are no sales for resale

on the Lamar System, only retail sales

and transportation for other customers;

the Lamar System is essentially one

integrated local distribution system with

certain gathering areas; the system is

limited to a specific geographical area in

rural Kansas and Colorado, and

connects to only one interstate pipeline,

Colorado Interstate Gas Company; and
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 50 / Wednesday, March 15, 1995 / Notices 13975

there are no other distribution

companies in the area.

Greeley requests that the Commission

treat its Lamar System as a local

distribution company for purposes of

Section 311 of the Natural Gas Policy

Act. Greeley further requests a waiver of

all reporting and accounting

requirements and rules and regulations

which are ordinarily applicable to

natural gas companies.

Any person desiring to be heard or to

make any protest with reference to said

application should on or before March

30, 1995, file with the Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission, Washington,

D.C. 20426, a motion to intervene or a

protest in accordance with the

requirements of the Commission’s Rules

of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR

385.214 and 385.211) and the

regulations under the Natural Gas Act

(18 CFR 157.10). All protests filed with

the Commission will be considered by

it in determining the appropriate action

to be taken but will not serve to make

the protestants parties to the

proceeding. Any person wishing to

become a party in any proceeding

herein must file a motion to intervene

in accordance with the Commission’s

rules.

Take further notice that, pursuant to

the authority contained in and subject to

the jurisdiction conferred upon the

Commission by Sections 7 and 15 of the

Natural Gas Act and the Commission’s

Rules of Practice and Procedure, a

hearing will be held without further

notice before the Commission or its

designee on this application if no

motion to intervene is filed within the

time required herein, if the Commission

on its own review of the matter finds

that a service area determination is

required by the public convenience and

necessity. If a motion for leave to

intervene is timely filed, or if the

Commission on its own motion believes

that formal hearing is required, further

notice of such hearing will be duly

given.

Under the procedure herein provided

for, unless otherwise advised, it will be

unnecessary for Greeley to appear or to

be represented at the hearing.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–6303 Filed 3–14–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. RP94–93–007]

K N Interstate Gas Transmission

Company; Revised Compliance Filing

March 9, 1995.

Take notice that on March 7, 1995, K

N Interstate Gas Transmission Co. (KNI)

tendered for filing a revised tariff sheet

in compliance with the Commission’s

February 10, 1995 Letter Order in the

referenced proceeding. KNI states that

its February 27, 1995 tariff compliance

filing inadvertently did not contain the

correct IT rate on Sheet No. 4 of First

Revised Volume No. 1–C of its FERC

Gas Tariff. KNI further states that Sub.

First Revised Sheet No. 4, submitted

with its filing, makes the appropriate

correction.

KNI states that copies of the filing

were served upon each person

designated on the official service list

complied by the Secretary in this

proceeding.

Any person desiring to protest said

filing should file a protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street, N.E.,

Washington D.C. 20426, in accordance

with Section 385.211 of the

Commission’s Rules and Regulations.

All such protests should be filed on or

before March 16, 1995. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make any

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Copies of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection in the Public Reference

Room.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–6306 Filed 3–14–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. TM95–2–16–003]

National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation;

Compliance Filing

March 9, 1995.

Take notice that on March 6, 1995,

National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation

(National) tendered for filing as part of

its FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised

Volume No. 1, Third Substitute Fifth

Revised Sheet No. 6.

National states that this tariff sheet is

filed in response to the Commission’s

order issued on October 21, 1994, in the

above-captioned proceeding.

Specifically, National states that the

October 21 Letter Order rejected Second

Substitute Fifth Revised Sheet No. 6

filed in this proceeding as premature

because the tariff sheet included the P–

2 and IR–2 Rate Schedules which had

not yet been approved by the

Commission. National states that this

left a tariff sheet in effect as of October

1, 1994, that did not include the P–2

and IR–2 Rate Schedules. National

states that since the Commission

approved the P–2 and IR–2 Rate

Schedules in a February 13, 1995, Order

in Docket No. RP94–80–000, et al.,

effective August 24, 1994, it is filing to

supersede the sheet effective as of

October 1, 1994, which did not include

the P–2 and IR–2 rates.

Any person desiring to protest said

filing should file a protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street, NE.,

Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance

with Rule 211 of the Commission’s

Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR

385.211). All such protests should be

filed on or before March 16, 1994.

Protests will be considered by the

Commission in determining the

appropriate action to be taken but will

not serve to make protestants parties to

the proceeding. Copies of this filing are

on file with the Commission and are

available for public inspection.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–6308 Filed 3–14–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. QF86–556–004]

Sunnyside Cogeneration Associates;

Application for Commission

Recertification of Qualifying Status of

a Small Power Production Facility

March 9, 1995.

On February 28, 1995, Sunnyside

Cogeneration Associates (applicant), c/o

B&W Sunnyside L.P., 20 South Van

Buren Avenue, Barberton, OH 44203,

and c/o NRG Sunnyside Inc., 1221

Nicollet Mall, Suite 700, Minneapolis,

MN 55403, submitted for filing an

application for recertification of a

facility as a small power production

facility pursuant to Section 292.207(b)

of the Commission’s Regulations. No

determination has been made that the

submittal constitutes a complete filing.

According to the applicant, the

bituminous coal refuse-fueled small

power production facility is located at

Carbon County, Utah, and consists of a

circulating fluidized bed boiler and an

extraction/condensing steam turbine

generating unit. the facility commenced

commercial operation on March 19,

1993.

In Docket No. QF86–556–000, the

applicant was granted certification for a

45 MW topping-cycle cogeneration

facility [39 FERC ¶ 62,091 (1987)]. In