alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2730

Price Pump Company:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 53 (Monday, March 20, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14733-14734]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6819]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


[[Page 14734]]

Minority Business Development Agency Business Development Center 
Applications: Miami, FL
AGENCY: Minority Business Development Agency, Commerce.

ACTION: Cancellation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Minority Business Development Agency is cancelling the 
announcement to solicit competitive applications under its Minority 
Business Development Center (MBDC) Program to operate the Miami MBDC. 
This solicitation was originally published in the Federal Register, 
Wednesday, February 15, 1995, Vol. 60. No. 31, 8639.

11.800  Minority Business Development Center

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance)

    Dated: March 13, 1995.
Donald L. Powers,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, Minority Business Development Agency.
[FR Doc. 95-6819 Filed 3-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-21-P
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 13, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-1724

Eccotemp Systems, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
Exhibit 32.4
 
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.
 /s/ Howard M. Sipzner

Howard M. SipznerExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate: August 8, 2008
 
 *
    
    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Brandywine Realty Trust and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
a6780583ex10_1.htm


Exhibit 10.1







SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO PROGRAM AGREEMENT







This SEVENTH AMENDMENT (“Seventh Amendment”) to the September 19th, 2007, Program Agreement as previously amended (the “Agreement”) by and between Republic Bank & Trust Company (“Republic”), a Kentucky banking corporation, and Jackson Hewitt Inc. (“JHI”), a Virginia corporation, is effective as of the 28th day of June, 2011.







RECITALS







WHEREAS, Republic and JHI entered into the Agreement on September 19, 2007.







WHEREAS, Republic and JHI amended the Agreement on December 2, 2008, November 23, 2009, December 29, 2009, June 30, 2010, September 30, 2010 and December 14, 2010.







WHEREAS, Republic and JHI desire to Amend certain terms of the Agreement.







NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants and agreements set forth below and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Republic and JHI do hereby agree to amend the Agreement as follows:







AMENDMENTS


 




	
1.

	
Section 9.4(a) is modified to read as follows:


	  	  	  	  
	  	
9.4

	
Termination by Republic.


	  	  	  	  
	  	  	
(a)

	
On or before July 29, 2011, or June 30th of each following year of the term, Republic may, at its option, terminate this Agreement early by giving written notice of termination to JHI, which will terminate the Agreement with respect to the remaining Tax Seasons.


	  	  	  	  
	
2.

	
Republic and JHI enter into this Seventh Amendment only for the purposes stated herein.  Unless otherwise amended herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain unchanged and in full force and effect.












IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Seventh Amendment has been executed and delivered by a duly authorized officer of each party as of the date set forth above.








	
REPUBLIC BANK & TRUST COMPANY

	 	
JACKSON HEWITT INC.


	  	  	 	  	  
	
By:

	
/s/ Kevin Sipes

	 	
By:

	
/s/ Daniel P. OBrien


	  	  	 	  	  
	
Name:

	
Kevin Sipes

	 	
Name:

	
Daniel P. OBrien


	  	  	 	  	  
	
Title:

	
EVP & CFO

	 	
Title:

	
EVP & CFO


	  	  	 	  	  
	
Date:

	
06/29/11

	 	
Date:

	
6/29/11







 


 


3
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-20179 Summary Calendar

IRVING DEAN ELLIOT, also known as Al Yasa Muhammad, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus MICHAEL GEERDS, Captain; McCLURE, Assistant Warden; KITCHEN, Captain; Chaplain E. FARUQ, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CV-1290

-------------------- July 6, 2001 Before JOLLY, DAVIS and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Irving Elliot, Texas prisoner # 384725, seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) following the district court’s dismissal of his civil rights suit and the court’s certification pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that his appeal is not being taken in good faith. By moving for IFP in this court, Elliot is challenging the district court’s determination that the appeal isO R D E R No. 01-20179 - 2 - not being taken in good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor , 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997). Liberally construed, Elliot’s argument is that the district court should have ordered the production of documents or conducted an evidentiary hearing to more fully examine Elliot’s claims before dismissing the complaint. Elliot has not identified a nonfrivolous issue for appeal, and he has not shown that the denial of IFP status by the district court was error.
See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). Elliot’s appeal lacks arguable merit and is DISMISSED AS
FRIVOLOUS. See id. at 219-20. The dismissal of the appeal counts as a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit also counts as strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 385-87 (5th Cir. 1996). Elliot is cautioned that if he accumulates three strikes, he may not proceed IFP in a civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Elliot’s motions for an evidentiary hearing and for the production of documents are DENIED.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4314 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the eligible age 

for the exemption from the retirement plan early withdrawal penalty 

for public safety officers. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 26, 2022 

Mr. TOOMEY (for himself and Mr. BENNET) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify 

the eligible age for the exemption from the retirement 

plan early withdrawal penalty for public safety officers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Public Safe5 ty Employees’ Timely Retirement Act of 2022’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF ELIGIBLE AGE. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (A) of section 

8 72(t)(10) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amendVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:46 Jun 02, 2022 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S4314.IS S4314

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4314 IS

1 ed by striking ‘‘age 50’’ and inserting ‘‘age 50 or 25 years 

2 of service under the plan, whichever is earlier’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

5 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32
 
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  I, Parrish Medley, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Davi Skin, Inc. for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Davi Skin, Inc.
 By:
 /s/ Parrish Medley
 Name:        Parrish Medley
 Title:          Chief Executive Officer
 Date:         August 23, 2004
 
 I, Margaret Robley, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Davi Skin, Inc. for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Davi Skin, Inc.
 By:
 /s/ Margaret Robley
 Name:        Margaret Robley
 Title:          Chief Financial Officer
 Date:         August 23, 2004




1
Exhibit 31.1
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Steven J. Douglass, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Payless ShoeSource, Inc., a Delawarecorporation;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;  4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)  Designed such internal controls over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal controls over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting andthe preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance withgenerally accepted accounting principles;  (c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation;  (d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant‘s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: June 8, 2005    /s/ Steven J. Douglass Steven J. Douglass Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 52 (Friday, March 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 14452]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6654]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-30,730]


Lightolier Model Shop of the Genlyte Group, Secaucus, NJ; 
Dismissal of Application for Reconsideration

    Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18 an application for administrative 
reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance for workers at Lightolier Model shop of the 
Genlyte Group, Secaucus, New Jersey. The review indicated that the 
application contained no new substantial information which would bear 
importantly on the Department's determination. Therefore, dismissal of 
the application was issued.

TA-W-30,730; Lightolier Model Shop of the Genlyte Group Secaucus, 
New Jersey (March 7, 1995)

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 9th day of March, 1995.
Victor J. Trunzo,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 95-6654 Filed 3-16-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-3405

Nissan North America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
FILED IN1st COURT OF APPEALS      HOUSTON, TEXAS11/30/2015 4:03:29 PMCHRISTOPHER A. PRINE                Clerk
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3146

Johnson Electric North America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-1652

Water Tech Corp: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions_03.20.1

9.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3010

C&K Components, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel