alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 52 (Friday, March 17, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 14390]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6549]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
50 CFR Part 672

[Docket No. 950206041-5041-01; I.D. 031095E]


Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska; Pacific Cod in the Central 
Regulatory Area

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Closure.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS is closing the directed fishery for Pacific cod by 
vessels catching Pacific cod for processing by the offshore component 
in the Central Regulatory Area of the Gulf of Alaska (GOA). This action 
is necessary to prevent exceeding the allocation of Pacific cod for the 
offshore component in this area.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 12 noon, Alaska local time (A.l.t.), March 13, 1995, 
until 12 midnight, A.l.t., December 31, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew N. Smoker, 907-586-7228.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The groundfish fishery in the GOA exclusive 
economic zone is managed by NMFS according to the Fishery Management 
Plan for Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska (FMP) prepared by the North 
Pacific Fishery Management Council under authority of the Magnuson 
Fishery Conservation and Management Act. Fishing by U.S. vessels is 
governed by regulations implementing the FMP at 50 CFR parts 620 and 
672.
    In accordance with Sec. 672.20(c)(1)(ii)(B), the allocation of 
Pacific cod for the offshore component in the Central Regulatory Area 
was established by the final groundfish specifications (60 FR 8470, 
February 14, 1995), as 4,565 metric tons (mt).
    The Director, Alaska Region, NMFS (Regional Director), has 
determined, in accordance with Sec. 672.20(c)(2)(ii), that the 
allocation of Pacific cod total allowable catch for the offshore 
component in the Central Regulatory Area soon will be reached. The 
Regional Director established a directed fishing allowance of 3,565 mt, 
with consideration that 1,000 mt will be taken as incidental catch in 
directed fishing for other species in the Central Regulatory Area. The 
Regional Director has determined that the directed fishing allowance 
has been reached. Consequently, NMFS is prohibiting directed fishing 
for Pacific cod by operators of vessels catching Pacific cod for 
processing by the offshore component in the Central Regulatory Area.
    Directed fishing standards for applicable gear types may be found 
in the regulations at Sec. 672.20(g).

Classification

    This action is taken under 50 CFR 672.20 and is exempt from review 
under E.O. 12866.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: March 13, 1995.
David S. Crestin,
Acting Director, Office of Fisheries Conservation and Management, 
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 95-6549 Filed 3-13-95; 4:33 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 53 (Monday, March 20, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14799-14800]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6732]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Documents Containing Reporting or Recordkeeping Requirements; 
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Review

Agency: Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).

ACTION: Notice of the OMB review of information collection.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has recently submitted 
to OMB for review the following proposal for collection of information 
under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 
35).
    1. Type of submission, new, revision or extension: New.
    2. The title of the information collections: FOIA Customer 
Satisfaction Survey. [[Page 14800]] 
    3. The form number if applicable: Not Applicable.
    4. How often the collection is required: One-time.
    5. Who will be required or asked to report: Voluntary submittal by 
requesters who receive a final response from the NRC to a Freedom of 
Information Act (FOIA) request during a three-month survey period.
    6. An estimate of the number of responses: Approximately 200 
surveys will be dispatched and an estimated 150 responses will be 
received.
    7. An estimate of the total number of hours needed annually to 
complete the requirement or request: Total hours for the one-time 
survey is 37.5 (15 minutes per response).
    8. Section 3504(h), Pub. L. 96-511 does not apply.
    9. Abstract: The NRC is surveying all requesters who receive a 
final response from the NRC to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) 
request during a three-month survey period. The survey will assess 
customer perceptions of the NRC FOIA process, and will identify areas 
for improvement.
    Copies of the submittal may be inspected or obtained for a fee from 
the NRC Public Document Room, 2120 L Street, NW., (Lower Level), 
Washington, DC 20555.
    Comments and questions should be directed by mail to the OMB 
reviewer: Troy Hillier, Office of Information & Regulatory Affairs 
(3150-0000), NEOB-10202, Office of Management and Budget, Washington, 
DC 20503.
    Comments can also be submitted by telephone at (202) 395-3084.
    NRC Clearance Officer is Brenda Jo. Shelton, (301) 415-7233.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 14th day of March, 1995.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Gerald F. Cranford,
Designated Senior Official for Information Resources Management.
[FR Doc. 95-6732 Filed 3-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M
Exhibit 31.2
                            SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, John F. Foley, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Salisbury Bancorp,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      a)    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
            disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
            supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
            registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
            to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
            period in which this report is being prepared;

      c)    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
            and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
            the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of
            the end of the period covered by this report based on such
            evaluation; and

      c)    disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
            control over financial reporting that occurred during the
            registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
            affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
            registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

      a)    all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or
            operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
            reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
            record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

      b)    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
            other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
            internal control over financial reporting.


Date: August 8, 2003

By:   /s/ John F. Foley
      -----------------
      Chief Financial Officer


                                       26
----

|                                                                                                                                                                                                         | Exhibit      32 |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|  Certification      of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18      U.S.C.Section      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of      2002  |

| 1)     | The      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Operating Partnership for the period      ended June 30, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m);      and |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
| 2)     | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Operating Partnership.                                                                      |

|   |    / S / Robert      J.      Attea                          Robert      J. AtteaChairman      of the BoardChief      Executive Officer of Sovran Holdings, Inc., the Sole General Partner      of the Operating Partnership |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |      / S / David      L.      Rogers                        David      L. RogersChief      Financial Officer of Sovran Holdings, Inc., the Sole General Partner      of the Operating Partnership                           |

----
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 49 (Tuesday, March 14, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 13737]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6208]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Organization of Agreement State Managers' Meeting

AGENCY: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff plans to 
hold a public meeting for managers of the Organization of Agreement 
States. Agreement States are States which have assumed regulatory 
authority over certain radioactive materials. The purpose of the 
meeting is to discuss Agreement State Program issues with Agreement 
State managers and other interested parties. Topics for discussion will 
include, among others: Status of NRC Agreement States Program 
Improvements; Open Discussion of Agreement State Issues; Integrated 
Materials Performance Evaluation Program; Event Reporting and Data 
Gathering; NRC Materials Licensing Business Process Redesign Project; 
and Licensee Wrongdoing Awareness Workshop.

DATES: The meeting will be held on April 5-6, 1995 from 8:30 a.m. to 
5:00 p.m. each day.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at NRC's Two White Flint North 
Auditorium, located at 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rosetta Virgilio, Office of State 
Programs, Mail Stop OWFN-3-D-23, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 
Washington, D.C. 20555, Telephone 301/415-2307.

CONDUCT OF THE MEETING: The meeting will be conducted in a manner that 
will expedite the orderly conduct of business. A transcript of the 
meeting will be available for inspection, and copying for a fee, at the 
NRC Public Document Room, 2120 L Street N.W. (Lower Level), Washington, 
D.C. 20555 on or about June 5, 1995.
    The following procedures apply to public attendance at the meeting:
    1. Questions or statements will be entertained on a first-come, 
first-served basis.
    2. Seating will be on a first-come, first-served basis.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 6th day of March, 1995.

    For the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Richard L. Bangart,
Director, Office of State Programs.
[FR Doc. 95-6208 Filed 3-13-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M
Exhibit 12.1  CONFORMED COPY  I, Markus Tellenbach, certify that:  1.I have reviewed
this annual report on Form 20-F of SBS Broadcasting S.A.;  2.Based on my
knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;  4.The Companys
other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the Company and have:  (a)Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)Evaluated
the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and  (c)Disclosed
in this report any change in the Companys internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Companys internal control over financial reporting; and  5.The Companys
other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys
auditors and the audit committee of the Companys Board of Directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a)All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and  (b)Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial
reporting.   Date: May 14, 2004By:
  /s/ Markus TellenbachMarkus TellenbachChief Executive Officer  Certification by M. Tellenbach,
Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-1994

Brooks Instrument LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 51 (Thursday, March 16, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 14298]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6494]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[OR-120-6332-00; GP5-086]


Notice of Review Period on Draft Interim Management Plan for Cape 
Blanco Lighthouse Site

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management has prepared a Draft Interim 
Management Plan for Cape Blanco Lighthouse site. The lighthouse site is 
located approximately 5 miles northwest of Port Orford, OR. The interim 
management plan will provide direction and management strategies during 
the five year permit period.

DATES: Comments should be submitted by April 17, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Comments should be sent to Myrtlewood Area Manager, BLM, 
1300 Airport Lane, North Bend, OR 97459.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Raymond Orazem, BLM, Myrtlewood 
Resource Area, 503-756-0100.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 4, 1994, the U.S. Coast Guard 
issued the BLM an interagency permit which authorizes BLM to access the 
headland and lighthouse interior for public access, interpretation and 
tours. This project is a cooperative effort between the U.S. Coast 
Guard, Bureau of Land Management, Oregon Parks and Recreation 
Department, Oregon State Historic Preservation Office, Advisory Council 
on Historic Preservation, the Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians of 
Oregon and the Coquille Indian Tribe.

    Dated: March 7, 1995.
Neal Middlebrook,
Area Manager, Myrtlewood Resource Area.
[FR Doc. 95-6494 Filed 3-15-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-P
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

LEONARD ESHAYA, Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 21-0584 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR2014-118120-001

The Honorable Ronda R. Fisk, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Phoenix

By Amanda M. Parker

Counsel for Respondent

Brown & Little PLC, Chandler

By Matthew O. Brown

Counsel for Petitioner

FILED 5-31-2022
STATE v. ESHAYA

Decision of the Court

2

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge Cynthia J. Bailey, Judge Peter B. Swann and Judge D. 

Steven Williams delivered the decision of the Court.

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Petitioner Leonard Eshaya seeks review of the superior 

court’s order denying his petition for post-conviction relief. This is 

petitioner’s first petition.

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will 

not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief.

State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19, 278 P.3d 1276, 1280 (2012). It is 

petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by 

denying the petition for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 

537, ¶ 1, 260 P.3d 1102, 1103 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of 

establishing abuse of discretion on review).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior 

court’s order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition 

for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of 

discretion.

¶4 We grant review and deny relief.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3638

ECM Industries LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_5-30-2019.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel