Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 52 / Friday, March 17, 1995 / Notices 14451

submitting this data may be obtained by

writing to the U.S. Department of Labor,

Employment Standards Administration,

Wage and Hour Division, Division of

Wage Determinations, 200 Constitution

Avenue N.W., Room S–3014,

Washington, D.C. 20210.

Withdrawn General Wage

Determination Decision

This is to advise all interested parties

that the Department of Labor is

withdrawing, from the date of this

notice, General Wage Determination No.

ME950038, dated Feb. 10, 1995.

Agencies with construction pending,

to which this wage decision would have

been applicable, should utilize Wage

Decision ME950037. Contracts for

which bids have been opened shall not

be affected by this notice. Also,

consistent with 29 CFR 1.6(c)(2)(i)(A),

when the opening of bids is less than

ten (10) days from the date of this

notice, this action shall be effective

unless the agency finds that there is

insufficient time to notify bidders of the

change and the finding is documented

in the contract file.

New General Wage Determination

Decisions

The number of the decisions added to

the Government Printing Office

document entitled ‘‘General Wage

Determinations Issued Under the DavisBacon and related Acts’’ are listed by

Volume and State:

Volume III

Tennessee

TN950057 (Mar. 17, 1995)

TN950058 (Mar. 17, 1995)

TN950059 (Mar. 17, 1995)

TN950060 (Mar. 17, 1995)

Modification to General Wage

Determination Decisions

The number of decisions listed in the

Government Printing Office document

entitled ‘‘General Wage Determinations

Issued Under the Davis-Bacon and

Related Acts’’ being modified are listed

by Volume and State. Dates of

publication in the Federal Register are

in parenthesis following the decisions

being modified.

Volume I

New York

NY950003 (Feb. 10, 1995)

NY950021 (Feb. 10, 1995)

NY950060 (Feb. 10, 1995)

Volume II

Pennsylvania

PA950042 (Feb. 10, 1995)

PA950064 (Feb. 10, 1995)

PA950065 (Feb. 10, 1995)

West Virginia

WV950006 (Feb. 10, 1995)

Volume III

Alabama

AL950004 (Feb. 10, 1995)

AL950006 (Feb. 10, 1995)

AL950018 (Feb. 10, 1995)

AL950034 (Feb. 10, 1995)

AL950044 (Feb. 10, 1995)

Florida

FL950008 (Feb. 10, 1995)

FL950045 (Feb. 10, 1995)

FL950077 (Feb. 10, 1995)

FL950095 (Feb. 10, 1995)

Georgia

GA950003 (Feb. 10, 1995)

GA950022 (Feb. 10, 1995)

GA950040 (Feb. 10, 1995)

GA950050 (Feb. 10, 1995)

GA950058 (Feb. 10, 1995)

GA950065 (Feb. 10, 1995)

GA950066 (Feb. 10, 1995)

North Carolina

NC950050 (Feb. 10, 1995)

Tennessee

TN950003 (Feb. 10, 1995)

TN950005 (Feb. 10, 1995)

TN950016 (Feb. 10, 1995)

TN950017 (Feb. 10, 1995)

Volume IV

Illinois

IL950001 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950002 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950003 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950004 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950005 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950006 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950007 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950008 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950009 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950011 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950012 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950013 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950014 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950015 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950016 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950017 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IL950020 (Feb. 10, 1995)

Indiana

IN950001 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IN950005 (Feb. 10, 1995)

IN950006 (Feb. 10, 1995)

Michigan

MI950035 (Feb. 10, 1995)

Volume V

Kansas

KS950005 (Feb. 10, 1995)

KS950014 (Feb. 10, 1995)

KS950029 (Feb. 10, 1995)

KS950066 (Feb. 10, 1995)

Nebraska

NE950009 (Feb. 10, 1995)

NE950011 (Feb. 10, 1995)

Texas

TX950063 (Feb. 10, 1995)

Volume VI

California

CA950001 (Feb. 10, 1995)

CA950002 (Feb. 10, 1995)

CA950004 (Feb. 10, 1995)

CA950027 (Feb. 10, 1995)

North Dakota

ND950002 (Feb. 10, 1995)

ND950026 (Feb. 10, 1995)

ND950049 (Feb. 10, 1995)

ND950050 (Feb. 10, 1995)

General Wage Determination

Publication

General wage determinations issued

under the Davis-Bacon and related Acts,

including those noted above, may be

found in the Government Printing Office

(GPO) document entitled ‘‘General Wage

Determinations Issued Under The DavisBacon and Related Acts’’. This

publication is available at each of the 50

Regional Government Depository

Libraries and many of the 1,400

Government Depository Libraries across

the country.

The general wage determinations

issued under the Davis-Bacon and

related Acts are available electronically

by subscription to the FedWorld

Bulletin Board System of the National

Technical Information Service (NTIS) of

the U.S. Department of Commerce at

(703) 487–4630.

Hard-copy subscriptions may be

purchased from: Superintendent of

Documents, U.S. Government Printing

Office, Washington, DC 20402, (202)

512–1800.

When ordering hard-copy

subscription(s), be sure to specify the

State(s) of interest, since subscriptions

may be ordered for any or all of the six

separate volumes, arranged by State.

Subscriptions include an annual edition

(issued in January or February) which

includes all current general wage

determinations for the States covered by

each volume. Throughout the remainder

of the year, regular weekly updates will

be distributed to subscribers.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 10th day of

March 1995.

Alan L. Moss,

Director, Division of Wage Determinations.

[FR Doc. 95–6442 Filed 3–16–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–27–M

Employment and Training

Administration

[TA–W–30,224, TA–W–30,370]

Apollo Dye, Paterson, NJ and Leader

Dye & Finishing, Paterson, NJ; Notice

of Revised Determination on

Reopening

On March 7, 1995, the Department, on

its own motion, reopened its

investigation for the former workers of

the subject firms.

The initial investigation resulted in

negative determinations on November

28, 1994 for workers at both firms

because the ‘‘contributed importantly’’

test of the Group Eligibility

Requirements of the Trade Act was not
14452 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 52 / Friday, March 17, 1995 / Notices

met. The denial notices were published

in the Federal Register on December 16,

1994 (59 FR 65076).

The findings show that Apollo Dye is

the parent company of Leader Dye &

Finishing. Both firms are engaged in

producing printed fabric and had

integrated production.

A late response to the Department’s

customer survey shows that a major

account reduced its business with

Apollo Dye because of increased

imports of printed dyed fabric.

Other findings show that U.S. imports

increased absolutely and relative to

domestic shipments in 1993 compared

to 1992 and in the first six months of

1994 compared to the same period in

1993. The ratio of imports to U.S.

production reached 143 percent in 1994.

Other findings show that the both

plants closed in July 1994 when all

production ceased and all workers were

laid off.

Conclusion

After careful consideration of the new

facts obtained on reopening, it is

concluded that increased imports of

articles like or directly competitive with

the printed dyed fabric produced by the

subject firms contributed importantly to

the decline in production and to the

total or partial separation of workers at

the subject firms. In accordance with the

provisions of the Trade Act of 1974, I

make the following revised

determination:

All former workers of Apollo Dye,

Paterson, New Jersey and its subsidiary,

Leader Dye & Finishing, Paterson, New Jersey

who became totally or partially separated

from employment on or after August 1, 1993

are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance

under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.

Signed at Washington, D.C., this 8th day of

March 1995.

Victor J. Trunzo,

Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment

Services, Office of Trade Adjustment

Assistance.

[FR Doc. 95–6652 Filed 3–16–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–M

[TA–W–30,505]

Cushman Industries, Inc., Hartford, CT;

Notice of Affirmative Determination

Regarding Application for

Reconsideration

On February 8, 1995, the company

requested administrative

reconsideration of the Department of

Labor’s Notice of Negative

Determination Regarding Eligibility to

Apply for Worker Adjustment

Assistance for workers at the subject

firm. The Department’s Negative

Determination was issued on January

20, 1995 and was published in the

Federal Register on February 10, 1995

(60 FR 8061).

New findings show from the company

show company imports of chucks from

China.

Conclusion

After careful review of the

application, I conclude that the claim is

of sufficient weight to justify

reconsideration of the Department of

Labor’s prior decision. The application

is, therefore, granted.

Signed at Washington, D.C., this 7th day of

March 1995.

Victor J. Trunzo,

Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment

Services, Office of Trade Adjustment

Assistance.

[FR Doc. 95–6657 Filed 3–16–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–M

[TA–W–30,730]

Lightolier Model Shop of the Genlyte

Group, Secaucus, NJ; Dismissal of

Application for Reconsideration

Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18 an

application for administrative

reconsideration was filed with the

Director of the Office of Trade

Adjustment Assistance for workers at

Lightolier Model shop of the Genlyte

Group, Secaucus, New Jersey. The

review indicated that the application

contained no new substantial

information which would bear

importantly on the Department’s

determination. Therefore, dismissal of

the application was issued.

TA–W–30,730; Lightolier Model Shop of the

Genlyte Group Secaucus, New Jersey

(March 7, 1995)

Signed at Washington, D.C. this 9th day of

March, 1995.

Victor J. Trunzo,

Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment

Services, Office of Trade Adjustment

Assistance.

[FR Doc. 95–6654 Filed 3–16–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–M

[TA–W–30,366]

H & R Blocks, Forks, WA; Notice of

Revised Determination on Reopening

On March 8, 1995, the Department, on

its own motion, reopened its

investigation for the former workers of

the subject firm.

The initial investigation resulted in a

negative determination on November

22, 1994 for workers at the subject firm.

The denial notice was published in the

Federal Register on December 16, 1994

(59 FR 65076).

The findings show that H & R Blocks

had reduced sales in 1993 compared to

1992 and all workers were laid off on

December 31, 1993. New findings show

a late response indicating that the

subject firm’s sole customer had

increased its reliance on imports in

1994 from 1993 while decreasing its

purchases from the subject firm.

Conclusion

After careful consideration of the new

facts obtained on reopening, it is

concluded that increased imports of

articles like or directly competitive with

cedar shakes and shingles produced by

the subject firm contributed importantly

to the decline in sales and to the total

or partial separation of workers at the

subject firm. In accordance with the

provisions of the Trade Act of 1974, I

make the following revised

determination:

All former workers of H & R Blocks in

Forks, Washington who became totally or

partially separated from employment on or

after September 20, 1993 are eligible to apply

for adjustment assistance under Section 223

of the Trade Act of 1974.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 8th day of

March 1995.

Victor J. Trunzo,

Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment

Services, Office of Trade Adjustment

Assistance.

[FR Doc. 95–6653 Filed 3–16–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–M

Investigations Regarding Certifications

of Eligibility to Apply for Worker

Adjustment Assistance

Petitions have been filed with the

Secretary of Labor under Section 221 (a)

of the Trade Act of 1974 (‘‘the Act’’) and

are identified in the Appendix to this

notice. Upon receipt of these petitions,

the Director of the Office of Trade

Adjustment Assistance, Employment

and Training Administration, has

instituted investigations pursuant to

Section 221 (a) of the Act.

The purpose of each of the

investigations is to determine whether

the workers are eligible to apply for

adjustment assistance under Title II,

Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations

will further relate, as appropriate, to the

determination of the date on which total

or partial separations began or

threatened to begin and the subdivision

of the firm involved.

The petitioners or any other persons

showing a substantial interest in the

subject matter of the investigations may

request a public hearing, provided such