Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 22, 1995 / Notices 15139

[Docket No. CP95–35–000]

EcoEle ́ctrica, L.P.; Notice of Meeting

March 14, 1995.

On March 28, 1995, at 8:45 a.m., the

Office of Pipeline Regulation

environmental staff will meet with

representatives of EcoEle ́ctrica, L.P. to

conduct a cryogenic design and

engineering review of the liquefied

natural gas import facilities proposed

for Guayanilla, Puerto Rico. The

meeting will be at the Greenspoint

Marriott Hotel, 225 North Sam Houston

Parkway East, Houston, Texas 77060.

For further information, call Chris

Zerby, (202) 208–0111.

Kevin P. Madden,

Director, Office of Pipeline Regulation.

[FR Doc. 95–7035 Filed 3–21–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. RP91–138–005]

Florida Gas Transmission Co., Notice

of Revised Pro Forma Tariff Sheets

March 16, 1995.

Take notice that on March 8, 1995

Florida Gas Transmission Company

(FGT) tendered for filing to become part

of its FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised

Volume No. 1, the following tariff

sheets:

Pro Forma Sheet No. 120

Pro Forma Sheet No. 120A

On February 10, 1995, FGT filed tariff

sheets in compliance with a

Commission order issued January 12,

1995 in Docket Nos. RS92–16–008 & 009

and RP91–138–002 (January 12 Order).

The February 10, 1995 filing included,

among other things, modifications to

FGT’s scheduling provisions to provide

a limited exemption from pro rata

scheduling for uses determined to be

‘‘Exempt Uses’’ under a new capacity

curtailment to be implemented on FGT’s

system by November 1, 1995. Such

modifications provide that if

nominations for firm service exceed the

capacity available for firm service, FGT

will first schedule requests for firm

transportation service to serve Exempt

Uses on a pro rata basis by end use

priority for Priority 1 and 2 Uses.

FGT inadvertently including these

modifications on Pro Forma Sheet No.

121 in its Receipt Point Scheduling

Priorities provisions contained in

Section 10.C.2. of the General Terms

and Conditions (GT&C) of FGT’s FERC

Gas Tariff. These provisions should

have been added in the Scheduling

Priorities—Mainline Capacity and

Delivery Points provisions of Section

10.C.1 of the GT&C. In the instant filing,

FGT is moving the identical provisions

as proposed in Pro Forma Sheet No. 121

to Pro Forma Sheet No. 120.

Any person desiring to protest said

filing should file a protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street, N.E.,

Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance

with Section 385.211 of the

Commission’s Rules and Regulations.

All such protests should be filed on or

before March 23, 1995. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate actions to

be taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceedings.

Copies of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–6987 Filed 3–21–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. RP94–93–008]

K N Interstate Gas Transmission Co.;

Notice of Filing of Refund Report

March 16, 1995.

Take notice that on March 13, 1995,

K N Interstate Gas Transmission Co.

(KNI) filed a refund report in the above

captioned docket. KNI states that the

filing and refunds were made to comply

with the Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission’s (Commission) Order

dated January 20, 1995. KNI states that

these amounts were paid by KNI on

March 8, 1995.

KNI states that the refund report

summarizes refund amounts for the

period July 1, 1994 through December

31, 1994.

KNI further states that copies of the

filing were served upon KNI’s

jurisdictional customers, interested

public bodies, and all parties to the

proceedings.

Any person desiring to protest with

reference to this filing should file a

protest with the Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission, 825 North

Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C.

20426, in accordance with Rule 211 of

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.211). All such

protests should be filed on or before

March 23, 1995. All protests filed with

the Commission will be considered by

it in determining the appropriate action

to be taken, but will not serve to make

the protestants parties to the

proceeding. Copies of this filing are on

file with the Commission and are

available for public inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–6988 Filed 3–21–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. RP94–325–000]

Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co.;

Notice of Informal Settlement

Conference

March 16, 1995.

Take notice that an informal

settlement conference will be convened

in this proceeding on Friday, March 24,

1995, at 10 a.m., at the offices of the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

810 First Street, NE., Washington, DC,

for the purpose of exploring the possible

settlement of the above-referenced

docket.

Any party, as defined by 18 CFR

385.102(c), or any participant, as

defined by 18 CFR 385.102(b), is invited

to attend. Persons wishing to become a

party must move to intervene and

receive intervenor status pursuant to the

Commission’s regulations (18 CFR

385.214).

For additional information, contact

Carmen Gastilo at (202) 208–2182 or

Kathleen Dias at (202) 208–0524.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–6989 Filed 3–21–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. PR95–7–000]

The Tekas Corp.; Notice of Petition for

Rate Approval

March 16, 1995.

Take notice that on March 1, 1995, the

Tekas Corporation (Tekas) filed

pursuant to section 284.123(b)(2) of the

Commission’s regulations, a petition for

rate approval requesting that the

Commission approve as fair and

equitable a maximum rate of $0.3334

per Mcf, plus a pro rata share of fuel and

lost and unaccounted for volumes, for

transportation services performed under

section 311(a)(2) of the Natural Gas

Policy Act of 1978 (NGPA).

Tekas states that it is an intrastate

pipeline within the meaning of section

2(16) of the NGPA and it owns and

operates an intrastate pipeline system in

the State of Kansas. Tekas proposes an

effective date of March 1, 1995.

Pursuant to section 284.123(b)(2)(ii),

if the Commission does not act within

150 days of the filing date, the rate will

be deemed to be fair and equitable and

not in excess of an amount which