alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.1**





Ener1,
      Inc.


500
      West
      Cypress Creek Road-Suite 100


Ft.
      Lauderdale, Florida, 33309





April
      6,
      2007





Securities
      and Exchange Commission


100
      F
      Street, NE


Washington,
      DC 20549




Re:
      Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Sec.
      1350





Dear
      Ladies and Gentlemen:





In
      connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Ener1, Inc.,
      for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission, I, Dr. Peter Novak, Chief Executive Officer of Ener1, Inc., hereby
      certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1)
            such
                Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Ener1, Inc., for the year ended December
                31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                15(d)
                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2)
            the
                information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Ener1,
                Inc.,
                for the year ended December 31, 2006, fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Ener1,
                Inc.





/s/
                Dr. Peter NovakDr.
                Peter Novak
              Chief
                Executive Officer
              (Principal
                Executive Officer and
              Duly
                Authorized Officer)





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
      document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
      that
      appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
      required by Section 906, has been provided to Ener1, Inc. and will be
      retained by Ener1, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.





In
      accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-B, this certification is being
“furnished” as Exhibit 32.1 to Ener1, Inc.`s annual report and shall not be
      deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that
      section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under
      the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as expressly set forth
      by
      specific reference in such a filing.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                          Subsidiaries of the Company

Subsidiary's                                 Jurisdiction of
Corporate Name                               Incorporation
--------------                               -------------

DHS Management Services, Inc.                Texas

Mobile Diagnostic Systems, Inc.              Texas

Heart Institute of Tulsa, Inc.               Oklahoma

Specialized Imaging Services Inc.            Illinois

Alpha Scanning Service, Inc.                 Louisiana

Diagnostic Health Services
 de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.                      Mexico

HomeCare International, Inc.                 Texas

Mobile Diagnostic Imaging, Inc.              Delaware

St. Louis Mobile Ultrasound, Inc.            Delaware

Advanced Diagnostic Imaging, Inc.            Texas

Pediatric Echocardiographic
Diagnostic Imaging, Inc.                     Texas

Ultrasound Diagnostic Services, Ltd.         Arizona

SoCal Diagnostic Services, Inc.              California

SoCal Subsidiary I, Inc.                     California

SoCal Subsidiary II, Inc.                    California

Santa Monica Imaging Center, Limited         
Partnership                                  California (limited partnership)

MAI Acquisition Corp.                        Texas
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

October 26, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2242

Hyflow Controls Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
1 I 

22 

[0.87] 

15 

[0.59] 

13,4 

[0.53] 

4,8 

[0.19] 5,2 

-No 

24,2 

[0.95] 

2X 03,25 

[0.128] 

iiiiiiilll 

10 llll mm 

BANNER ENGINEERING CORP. 

P.O. BOX 9414 

MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440 

kellllllll 

hh, 

8 7 6 5 4 3 l 2 1 

TITLE 

This drawing is the property 

of BANNER ENGINEERING CORP. 

and is proprietary in general 

and in detail. Its contents 

shall not be revealed to 

outside parties without 

written consent of BANNER 

THIRD ANGLE PROJECTION 

018 LASER AF CABLE 

wEB ASSEMBLY 

NOTES: 

I. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS [INCHES] UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SIZE 

SCALE 

DRAWING NO 

139429 

SHEET I OF I 

REV. 

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 

PRO/E
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 32.1

                      TWEETER HOME ENTERTAINMENT GROUP INC.


    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tweeter Home Entertainment Group,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Jeffrey S. Stone, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition of the Company as of June 30, 2004 and results
of operations of the Company for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2004.





                                         /s/ Jeffrey S. Stone
                                         --------------------------------------
                                         Jeffrey S. Stone, President and Chief
                                         Executive Officer

                                         August 16, 2004
#### ANNIE PRIDGEN, Widow of J. HENRY PRIDGEN, Deceased, v. SIDNEY PRIDGEN et al.

(Filed 29 September, 1926.)

*S. T. Valentine and Gooley & Bone for plaintiff.*

*W. H. Yarborough, Austin & Davenport and W. M. Person for defendants.*

Per Curiam.

This was a special proceeding brought by plaintiff against defendants to lay off dower in the lands of her husband, J. Henry Pridgen, deceased, in which it was alleged that he was seized and possessed during coverture. The defendants, children of the first marriage, set up as a defense a parol trust and a certain paper-writing in which J. Henry Pridgen reserved a life-estate in the “Hometract” of 115 1/2 acres more or less, on which he resided, and at his death the land to be equally divided between them. The paper-writing was written and executed on the day before J". Henry Pridgen’s second mar*811riage, and tbe paper-writing gave the land at Ms death to the children of his first marriage.

From a careful review of the evidence we think the court below tried the case in accordance with the opinion of *Varser, J.,*in *Pridgen v. Pridgen,*190 N. C., p. 102. The judgment below is

Affirmed.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3442

Scosche Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
### NU M BER 13- 09- 0031 1-C V 

## COURT OF A PP EA LS T H I R T E E N T H D I S T R I C T O F T E X AS CORPUS CHRI ST I -E DI NBURG

____ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _______ _ OSC A R FL ORE S, A pp ellan t,
v . DA IM LER CHRYSLER FINA NCIA L SE RVI C ES A M ER IC AS L L C ., ETA L ., A p p el le es .

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ __ _ _ _ _ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ___ On a p p ea l f ro m th e C o u n ty C o u rta t L awN o . 5 of H ida lgoC ou nty , T exas .

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ _ 

## ME MOR A N D U M OP I N I ON B ef or e Just i ces Ro dr i guez, G ar za, and V el a M em or andu m O pi ni on P erC ur i am Appel lan t, Osc ar

Flores, att empted t o per fect an appeal from orders e ntered by the Cou nty C our t atLaw N o. 5 of Hi dal g o C ounty , Tex as, i n c ause number C L- 08- 0038- E. The
orders were s ig ned on Apr il 8, 2009, and appel lan t filed a not ic e of appeal on M ay 8, 2009.2

On J u n e 1 9 , 2 0 0 9 , t h e C l e r ko f t h i s C o u rtn o t i fi e d a p p e l l a n tt h a ti ta p p e a re d the noti ce of a p p e a l w as not t imel y fil ed. Appel lan t was adv is ed th at, if the defect was not corrected w ithin te n da ys f ro m th e da te of receipt of

this Court’s letter, th e ap pea l would be d ismissed

. T here af ter, appellan t f iled a m otion to realign the pa rties and chan ge sty le
o f case, request ing this appe al now be conside red a pe tition for w rit of man dam us. Appel lan t hasnot respon ded to this Cour t’ s defect lett er

concer nin g the ti meli ness of the app eal. Con temporaneous w it h the f iling of appel lan t’ s mot ion to re ali g n the par ti es and chan ge sty le of

case, ap pellan t f iled a P etition for W rit of Manda mu s und er this cause
n u m b e r, 13 -0 9 -0 0 3 1 1 -CV

. Ap p e lla n t’ s mo ti o n to re a lign th e p a rt ie s a n d th e re b y cha n ge styl e of case is DENIED. The Petition for W rit of Manda mu s f iled un d e r this cause number , 13- 09- 00311- CVis h e reby transfer re d to caus e number 13- 09- 00488- CV

. Appel lan t i s respon si ble for pay ing fees for th e fil ing of the P eti ti on for W ri t of M andamus in caus e number

13- 09- 00488- CV

. T he Cou rt, having examine d and f ully consid ered the do cum ent s on f ile, app ellant ’s failu re to ti mely

per fect hi s a ppeal , and appel lan t’ s fai lure to re spond to thi s C our t’ s n oti ce, is o f t h e o p in io n t h a t t h e a p p e a l sh o u ld b e d is m is s e d fo r wan to f ju ri s d ic t io n . A c c o rd in gl y, the a ppeal i s h ereby

D ISM ISSE D FO R W AN T OF JU RI SD IC TION

. SeeT EX . R. A PP . P. 42. 3(a)(c). P E RC U R I A M Me moran dum Opi nio n del iv ered and filed thi s 2 5th d ay

of Aug ust , 200 9.
Cite as 2015 Ark. 473



## SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

IN RE ARKANSAS SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE ON CIVIL PRACTICE Opinion Delivered December 10, 2015

PER CURIAM Ann Grimes, Esq., of Pulaski County, Robert Veach, Esq., of Pope County, David Glover, Esq. of Pulaski County, are appointed to the Committee on Civil Practice for three-year terms to expire on July 31, 2018. We thank them for accepting appointment to this important committee. We express our gratitude to the following members, whose terms have expired, for their years of dedicated service to the Committee on Civil Practice: Judge Earnest Brown of Jefferson County; Judge Brandon Harrison of the Arkansas Court of Appeals; Michelle Ator, Esq., of Pulaski County; Hani Hashem, Esq., of Drew County, and Professor John J. Watkins, Committee Advisor, of Fayetteville.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4227 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4227

 To streamline the oil and gas permitting process and to recognize fee 
 ownership for certain oil and gas drilling or spacing units, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 16, 2022

Mr. Hoeven (for himself and Mr. Cramer) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To streamline the oil and gas permitting process and to recognize fee 
 ownership for certain oil and gas drilling or spacing units, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COMPLIANCE WITH BLM PERMITTING.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law but 
subject to any State requirements, a Bureau of Land Management drilling 
permit shall not be required under the Federal Oil and Gas Royalty 
Management Act of 1982 (30 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) or section 3164.1 of 
title 43, Code of Federal Regulations (or a successor regulation), for 
an action occurring within an oil and gas drilling or spacing unit if--
            (1) less than 50 percent of the minerals within the oil and 
        gas drilling or spacing unit are minerals owned by the Federal 
        Government; and
            (2) the Federal Government does not own or lease the 
        surface estate within the area directly impacted by the action.
    (b) Notification.--Each State with an approved permit to drill or 
drilling plan that would impact or extract oil and gas owned by the 
Federal Government shall notify the Secretary of the Interior of the 
approved permit to drill or drilling plan not later than 45 days after 
the date on which the permit or plan is approved.
    (c) Royalties.--Nothing in this section affects the amount of 
royalties due to the Federal Government from the production of the 
Federal minerals within the oil and gas drilling or spacing unit.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 7, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 12563]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5488]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Brill Bancshares, Inc., et al.; Formations of; Acquisitions by; 
and Mergers of Bank Holding Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied for the Board's 
approval under section 3 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 
1842) and Sec.  225.14 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.14) to 
become a bank holding company or to acquire a bank or bank holding 
company. The factors that are considered in acting on the applications 
are set forth in section 3(c) of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Each application is available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. Once the application has been accepted 
for processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing to the Reserve Bank or to the offices of the Board of 
Governors. Any comment on an application that requests a hearing must 
include a statement of why a written presentation would not suffice in 
lieu of a hearing, identifying specifically any questions of fact that 
are in dispute and summarizing the evidence that would be presented at 
a hearing.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received not later than March 31, 1995.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (James M. Lyon, Vice 
President) 250 Marquette Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480:
    1. Brill Bancshares, Inc., Brill, Wisconsin; to become a bank 
holding company by acquiring 80.11 percent of the voting shares of 
Brill State Bank, Brill, Wisconsin.
    2. First Community Bank Group, Inc., and Todd County Agency, Inc., 
both of Hopkins, Minnesota; to acquire a total of 100 percent of the 
voting shares of Citizens State Bank of Barrett, Barrett, Minnesota.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 1, 1995.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-5488 Filed 3-6-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
CERTIFICATIONS

I, Baldwin Yung, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Telava Networks, Inc.



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and



c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and



6. The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: December 17, 2007



/s/ Baldwin Yung

Baldwin Yung

Chief Executive and Financial Officer
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2543

Reelcraft Industries:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn