alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 50 (Wednesday, March 15, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 13968]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6313]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[I.D. 030795E]


Caribbean Fishery Management Council; Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Scientific and Statistical Committee (SSC) and the 
Advisory Panel (AP) of the Caribbean Fishery Management Council 
(Council) will hold separate meetings to discuss the Draft Queen Conch 
Fishery Management Plan.
    The SSC will meet on March 21, 1995, at the Travelodge Hotel, San 
Juan, Puerto Rico. The AP will meet on March 27, at the same location. 
Both meetings will begin at 10:00 a.m. and adjourn at 4:00 p.m.
    The meetings are open to the public, and will be conducted in the 
English language. However, simultaneous translation (English/Spanish) 
will be available at the AP meeting.
    Fishers and other interested persons are invited to attend. Members 
of the public will be allowed to submit oral or written statements 
regarding agenda issues.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Caribbean Fishery Management Council, 
268 Munoz Rivera Avenue, Suite 1108, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00918-2577; 
telephone: (809) 766-5926.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: These meetings are physically accessible to 
people with disabilities. For more information or requests for sign 
language interpretation and/or other auxiliary aids please contact Mr. 
Miguel A. Rolon, Executive Director, Caribbean Fishery Management 
Council, at the above address and telephone number, at least 5 days 
prior to the meeting date.

    Dated: March 9, 1995.
David S. Crestin,
Acting Director, Office of Fisheries Conservation and Management, 
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 95-6313 Filed 3-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 16, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-30740 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus
SOLEDAD A. MURILLO, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 1:03-CR-10002-01

-------------------- Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Soledad A.
Murillo on direct appeal has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief
pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Counsel’s motion to supplement the record on appeal with a letter
from Murillo’s treating physician is GRANTED. Counsel’s motion to place the letter under seal is also GRANTED.
Murillo has not filed a response to counsel’s A nders brief.

Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no2 G:\opin-sc\03-30740.opn.wpd nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw
is GRANTED, counsel is ex cused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3274

Crane Pumps & Systems: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_5-30-2019.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
#### Patrick Stubbs, Plaintiff, v. The Hudson River Ore and Iron Company, Defendant.

—Motion for new trial denied and judgment ordered for defendant, with costs.

Opinion by

Landon, J.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4283 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4283

 To authorize the confiscation of assets of the Russian Federation and 
    the use of such assets to offset costs to the United States of 
                         assistance to Ukraine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 May 19 (legislative day, May 17), 2022

  Mr. Daines introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize the confiscation of assets of the Russian Federation and 
    the use of such assets to offset costs to the United States of 
                         assistance to Ukraine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONFISCATION OF ASSETS OF RUSSIAN FEDERATION; USE TO OFFSET 
              COSTS TO UNITED STATES OF AID TO UKRAINE.

    (a) In General.--The President shall--
            (1) confiscate, through instructions or licenses or in such 
        other manner as the President determines appropriate, funds of 
        the Government of the Russian Federation that are subject to 
        the jurisdiction of the United States; and
            (2) deposit funds confiscated under paragraph (1) in the 
        general fund of the Treasury to offset the costs of amounts 
        appropriated by any Act making emergency supplemental 
        appropriations for assistance for the situation in Ukraine for 
        the fiscal year ending September 30, 2022.
    (b) Vesting.--All right, title, and interest in funds confiscated 
under subsection (a) shall vest in the Government of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 26, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-1974

Curtis Instruments, Inc: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September_2019.pdf. 

An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the exclusion notice. The scope of the exclusion is governed by the scope of the 10-digit HTSUS 

subheadings and product descriptions in the annex to the product exclusion notice, and not by the 

product descriptions set out in any particular request for exclusion. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
Model Number: CUF1252

Universal Advanced Premium Carbon Filter

Docket Number: USTR-2018-0025: Exclusion Request for Water Filtration Products (HTS 8421.21.0000)

PRODUCT SUBMISSIONS:

Individual DIM: 5.50" x 2.50" x 9.50"
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3445

Scosche Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXHIBIT 13.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. §1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









In connection with the Annual Report of Lorus Therapeutics Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ended May 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Aiping H. Young, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:




1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date: November 30, 2009








/s/ Aiping H. Young


Aiping H. Young


President and Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7298

BEVERLY DOREATHA HAMPTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

VIRGINIA CORRECTIONAL CENTER FOR WOMEN,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District

Judge. (CA-97-696-2)

Submitted: December 18, 1997 Decided: January 7, 1998

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Beverly Doreatha Hampton, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing her 42

U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The district court properly required

exhaustion of administrative remedies under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1997e(a)

(West Supp. 1997). Because Appellant did not demonstrate to the

district court that she had exhausted administrative remedies or

that such remedies were not available, the court's dismissal of the

action, without prejudice, was not an abuse of discretion. We

therefore affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 57 (Friday, March 24, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 15528-15529]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7261]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
48 CFR Part 215


Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Contracting by 
Negotiation

AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD).

ACTION: Proposed rule with request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is proposing to amend the Defense 
Federal Acquisition Supplement (DFARS) to permit the head of the 
contracting activity to determine the appropriate level to delegate 
authority for the approval of second and subsequent rounds of best and 
final offers for competitive negotiated acquisitions under other than 
formal source selection.

DATES: Comments on the proposed rule should be submitted in writing to 
the [[Page 15529]] address shown below on or before May 23, 1995, to be 
considered in the formulation of the final rule.

ADDRESSES: Interested parties should submit written comments to: 
Defense Acquisition Regulations Council, Attn: Mr. R.G. Layser, 
PDUSD(A&T)DP(DAR), IMD 3D139, 3062 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 
20301-3062. Telefax number (703) 602-0350. Please cite DFARS Case 95-
D006 in all correspondence related to this issue.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. R.G. Layser, (703) 602-0131.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A. Background

    This proposed rule was issued to allow the head of the contracting 
activity to determine the appropriate level to delegate authority for 
the approval of second and subsequent rounds of best and final offers 
for competitive negotiated acquisitions under other than formal source 
selection.

B. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The rule does not constitute a significant DFARS revision within 
the meaning of FAR 1.501 and Public Law 98-577 because this rule only 
changes internal agency approval procedures.

C. Paperwork Reduction Act

    The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply because this proposed 
rule does not impose any new recordkeeping, information collection 
requirements, or collection of information from offerors, contractors, 
or members of the public which require the approval of OMB under 44 
U.S.C. 3501, et seq.

List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 215

    Government procurement.
Claudia L. Naugle,
Deputy Director, Defense Acquisition Regulations Council.

    Therefore, 48 CFR Part 215 is proposed to be amended as follows:
    1. The authority citation for Part 215 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 41 U.S.C. 421 and 48 CFR Chapter 1.

PART 215--CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION

    2. Section 215.611 is amended by revising paragraph (c)(i)(B) to 
read as follows:


Sec. 215.611  Best and final offers.

    (c)(i) * * *
    (B) The head of the contracting activity (HCA) or designee for all 
other competitive negotiated acquisitions.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 95-7261 Filed 3-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
Exhibit 10.2










Exhibit 10.2




Summary of

Fiscal 2012 Long-Term Incentive Program

for Tandy Brands Accessories, Inc.




Pursuant to authority granted by the Board of Directors of Tandy Brands Accessories, Inc.
(the “Company”), on June 24, 2011, the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of
Directors approved the Company’s fiscal 2012 long-term incentive program, pursuant to which
performance units will be granted to the Company’s executive officers for the performance period
beginning July 1, 2011 and ending June 30, 2013. Under the long-term incentive program, target
awards are expressed as a dollar amount, with threshold, target and maximum payout opportunities
expressed as a percentage of the target award (actual payouts may range anywhere between the
threshold and maximum percentages). No payout will occur unless threshold performance is achieved.
The Compensation Committee approved the following payout opportunities for achieving threshold, target and maximum
performance:



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Threshold	 	 	 	 	 	 	Maximum	 
	Executive Officer	 	(as a % of Target)	 	 	Target	 	 	(as a % of Target)	 
	 
	 
	Chief Executive Officer
	 	 	50	%	 	$	350,000	 	 	 	200	%
	 
	 
	Chief Accounting Officer
	 	 	50	%	 	$	60,000	 	 	 	200	%
	 
	 
	Other Executive Officers
	 	 	50	%	 	$	100,000	 	 	 	200	%






To support the Company’s focus on creating long-term shareholder value, the financial metric
approved by the Compensation Committee to determine whether target performance has been achieved is
earnings per share, as an average over the performance period, with aggressive performance targets
set by the Compensation Committee. Each performance unit award will generally be comprised 50% of
cash and 50% of phantom shares of the common stock of the Company. The number of phantom shares of
common stock attributable to the performance unit award will be determined based on the fair market
value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Assuming continued employment, if, at
the end of the performance period, at least the threshold performance level has been achieved, the
performance units vest and, to the extent earned, will be settled in cash. The Board of Directors
of the Company may, in its discretion, adjust the target measures to exclude one-time,
non-operating items that may occur during the performance period, and, if shares are available
under the Company’s benefit plans, pay the portion of the award payable in phantom shares with
common stock of the Company. All awards issued pursuant to the 2012 long-term incentive program
are made under the Company’s 2002 Omnibus Plan.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4132

Scosche Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
* Honorable Robert B. Propst, Senior U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of Alabama, sitting by designation. L. C., by Johnathan ZIMRING, as guardian ad lite m and next friend, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.Tommy OLMSTEAD, Commissioner of the Department of Human Resources; et al., DefendantsAppellants. No. 97-8538 Non-Argument Calendar. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Dec. 21, 1999. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (No. 1:95-CV-1210-MHS); Marvin H. Shoob, Judge. ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Before TJOFLAT and BARKETT, Circuit Judges, and PROPST * , Senior District Judge. PER CURIAM: We remand this case to the district court for proceed ings consistent with the Supreme Court's opinion in Olmstead v. L.C., --- U.S. ----, 119 S.Ct. 2176, 144 L.Ed.2d 540 (1999).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-26-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-26-1999
<CASH>                                          93,352
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,296
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    155,361
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               296,286
<PP&E>                                         380,635
<DEPRECIATION>                                 120,906
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 603,917
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          165,371
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                    (43,088)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   603,917
<SALES>                                      1,830,195
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,830,195
<CGS>                                        1,387,619
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,387,619
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               399,376
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              33,630
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,651
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,372
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,279
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (17,311)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,032)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (180.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (180.64)


</TABLE>