alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- Lexmark International, Inc. Under Contract No. SP7000-12-C-0015 APPEARANCE FORTHE APPELLANT: ) ) ) ) )

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 61285

Karen N. Pohl, Esq.

Associate General Counsel Daniel K. Poling, Esq.

DLA ChiefTrial Attorney Bruce T. McCarty, Esq.

Trial Attorney DLA Counsel

- Document Services New Cumberland, PA David R. Nolte, Esq.

Associate General Counsel DLA Energy Fort Belvoir, VA ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 17 April 2018

Administrative Judge Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61285, Appeal ofLexmark International, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:
JEFFREYD. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

August 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-1706

Banner Engineering Corp:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-3577

Nissan North America, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
#### MRS. W. T. HECKSTALL v. CITIZENS BANK OF WINDSOR, GURNEY P. HOOD, Commissioner of Banks, and HENRY SPRUILL, Liquidating Agent.

(Filed 2 March, 1932.)

Banks and Banking H d — In this case held: depositor was entitled to preferred claim against receiver of hank.

Where it is established by the jury that a bank, without the knowledge or consent of its depositor, took his bonds and sold them and credited the depositor with the amount in its savings department: *Held,*upon the bank’s becoming insolvent the depositor is entitled to a preferred claim against the receiver to the extent of the value of the bonds as a special deposit, it appearing that the depositor had never ratified the act of the bank by drawing on the fund or otherwise.

Appeal by defendants from *Harris, J.,*at November Term, 1931, of Bertie.

No error.

The plaintiff brought suit to recover the value of certain Liberty Bonds deposited by her in the Citizens Bank of "Windsor and alleged to have been converted by the bank. Upon the pleadings and evidence issues were submitted to the jury, who found for their verdict that the bank sold the plaintiff’s bonds and deposited the proceeds in the savings department without her authority, and that the deposit was carried in its entirety without the plaintiff’s drawing on it or otherwise ratifying such sale. It is admitted that the amount was $400. •

It was adjudged on the verdict that the plaintiff is entitled to recover the sum of $400, with interest at 4% per cent and that she be declared a preferred claimant against the assets of the bank in the hands of the receiver to the amount of her recovery. The defendants excepted and appealed.

*J. A. Pritchett for appellants.*

*Ward & Grimes for appellee.*

*351Pee Cueiam.

Tbe principal questions in controversy were whether the deposit was general or special and whether the plaintiff was entitled to a preference in the administration of the bank’s assets. In effect the jury found that the deposit was special and that the plaintiff is entitled to recover the value of the bonds. We have considered all the assignments of error and find no error. *Corporation Commission v. Trust Co.,*193 N. C., 696; *Parker v. Central Bank and Trust Company, ante,*230.

No error.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 48 (Monday, March 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 13423]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6132]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Office of Postsecondary Education; State Postsecondary Review 
Program

AGENCY: Department of Education.

ACTION: Notice extending the closing date for receipt of State 
applications for fiscal year 1994 funds.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On July 12, 1994, the Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary 
Education published a notice in the Federal Register (59 FR 35501) that 
established September 30, 1994 as the closing date for the receipt of 
applications for fiscal year 1994 funds under the State Postsecondary 
Review Program (SPRP). The purpose of this notice is to extend the 
September 30 closing date to March 15, 1995. This will allow States 
that failed to submit their applications before the previously 
published deadline date to receive fiscal year 1994 SPRP funds if their 
applications are received by March 15, 1995. The Secretary takes this 
action because the Secretary strongly believes that it is important for 
all States to participate in the SPRP and to begin to review referred 
institutions, as soon as possible.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Kenneth R. Waters, Branch Chief, 
State Liaison Branch, U.S. Department of Education, 600 Independence 
Avenue, SW, Room 3036, ROB-3, Washington, DC 20202-5244. Telephone: 
(202) 708-7417.
    Individuals who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) 
may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern time, Monday through Friday.

    Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1099a-1099a-3.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 84.267, State 
Postsecondary Review Program)

    Dated: March 8, 1995.
David A. Longanecker,
Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education.
[FR Doc. 95-6132 Filed 3-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P
Exhibit 31.3  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I,
Adam Metz, certify that:  1.I have reviewed
this Amendment No. 2 on Form 10-K/A to the annual report on Form 10-K of
General Growth Properties, Inc.; and  2.Based on my
knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.  Date:
  April 30, 2010/s/
  ADAM METZAdam
  Metz Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 50 (Wednesday, March 15, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 13976]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6307]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-201-000]


Williams Natural Gas Company; Filing

March 9, 1995.
    Take notice that on March 1, 1995, Williams Natural Gas Company 
(WNG) filed Schedule A, Pages 2 and 3 from its December 1, 1994 filing, 
in Docket No. TM95-2-45-001, which shows no under or over recovery for 
October through December 1993 for its Storage and West Panhandle 
gathering area. Therefore, no tariff filing is being made at this time. 
WNG will make a filing to be effective June 1, 1995 to eliminate the 
under or over recovery component that has been in the percentages for 
all other areas for twelve months.
    WNG states that it failed on December 1, 1994, in Docket No. TM95-
2-43-001 to reflect revised fuel and loss reimbursement percentages 
effective January 1, 1995. In the filing, WNG did not include under 
recoveries for the three-month period October through December, 1993 
under the assumption that under recoveries for this period, which were 
included in WNG's prior filing in Docket Nos. RP95-172 and RP94-205, 
would be permitted to be included in that prior filing. In this regard, 
WNG also proposed that such under recovery component, which represents 
the October through December 1993 period, be permitted to remain in 
effect for a full twelve months. Such twelve-month period ends on March 
31, 1995 for Storage and the West Panhandle gathering area, and on May 
31, 1995 for all other areas. Accordingly, WNG proposed to file revised 
tariff sheets effective April 1, 1995 and June 1, 1995 to eliminate the 
under or over recovery component applicable to October through December 
1993.
    WNG states that copies of this filing are being served on all 
participants listed on the service lists maintained by the Commission 
in the dockets referenced above and on all the WNG's jurisdictional 
customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 
20426, in accordance with 18 CFR 385.214 and 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests should 
be filed on or before March 16, 1995. Protests will be considered by 
the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but 
will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. 
Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available 
for public inspection in the public reference room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-6307 Filed 3-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER 
PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
John E. Bourgoin, certify, to the best of my knowledge, that based upon a review of the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MIPS Technologies, Inc. for the three months ended
December 31, 2004 (the Form 10-Q), the Form 10-Q fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of MIPS Technologies, Inc. for the three
month period covered by the Form 10-Q.

|                         |                                      
|------------------------ | -------------------------------------
|                         |                                      
|                         |                                      
|                        
|Dated:  February 7, 2005 | By:     /s/ JOHN E. BOURGOIN         
|                         | John E. Bourgoin                     
|                         | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                         | MIPS Technologies, Inc.              

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided by MIPS Technologies and will be
retained by it and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

1

---
Exhibit 10.1




---



##### 



PageARTICLE IGENERAL1.1 Purpose
    
    
    11.2 Administration
    
    
    11.3 Persons Eligible for Awards
    
    
    21.4 Types of Awards Under Plan
    
    
    21.5 Shares Available for Awards
    
    
    21.6 Definitions of Certain Terms
    
    
    3ARTICLE IIAWARDS UNDER THE PLAN2.1 Agreements Evidencing Awards
    
    
    52.2 No Rights as a Shareholder
    
    
    52.3 Grant of Stock Options, Stock Appreciation
Rights and Reload Options
    
    
    62.4 Exercise of Options and Stock Appreciation Rights
    
    
    82.5 Termination of Employment; Death
    
    
    92.6 Grant of Restricted Stock
    
    
    92.7 Grant of Restricted Stock Units
    
    
    102.8 Other Stock-Based Awards
    
    
    112.9 Grant of Dividend Equivalent Rights
    
    
    112.10 Right of Recapture
    
    
    11ARTICLE IIIMISCELLANEOUS3.1 Amendment of the Plan; Modification
of Awards
    
    
    123.2 Tax Withholding
    
    
    123.3 Restrictions
    
    
    133.4 Nonassignability
    
    
    133.5 Requirement of Notification of Election
Under Section 83(b) of the Code
    
    
    133.6 Requirement of Notification Upon Disqualifying
Disposition Under Section 421(b) of the Code
    
    
    143.7 Change in Control
    
    
    143.8 Right of Discharge Reserved
    
    
    153.9 Nature of Payments
    
    
    153.10 Non-Uniform Determinations
    
    
    153.11 Other Payments or Awards
    
    
    153.12 Section Headings
    
    
    153.13 Effective Date; Term of Plan; 1993 Plan
    
    
    163.14 Governing Law
    
    
    16




---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 



2.3
    
    GRANT OF STOCK OPTIONS, STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS AND RELOAD OPTIONS




---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 



3.5
    
    REQUIREMENT OF NOTIFICATION OF
ELECTION UNDER SECTION 83(B) OF THE CODE
  3.6
    
    REQUIREMENT OF NOTIFICATION UPON DISQUALIFYING
DISPOSITION UNDER SECTION 421(B) OF THE CODE




---



##### 








---



##### 








---



#####
Exhibit 32.1

**Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BlackRock, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterlyperiod ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Laurence D. Fink, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Paul L. Audet, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company,each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and

          (2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| /s/ LAURENCE D. FINK |                        |
|----------------------|-----------------------------|
|                      |                        |
| Name:                | **Laurence D. Fink**        |   |
| Title:               | **Chief Executive Officer** |   |
| Date:                | August 12, 2003             |   |
|                 |                        |   |
| /s/ PAUL L. AUDET    |                        |
|                      |                        |
| Name:                | **Paul L. Audet**           |   |
| Title:               | **Chief Financial Officer** |   |
| Date:                | August 12, 2003             |   |

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 andshould not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to BlackRock, Inc. and will be retained by BlackRock, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>               5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF BOSTON CELTICS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND ITS
SUBSIDIARIES AS OF MARCH 31, 2000 AND THE RELATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>            1,000

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           2,679
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                87,958
<PP&E>                                              45
<DEPRECIATION>                                      37
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  89,062
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,283
<BONDS>                                         83,688
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (44,853)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    89,062
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,874
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,177
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (655)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,855)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,855)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.69)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.69)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Steven J. Douglass, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Payless ShoeSource, Inc., aDelaware corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information ; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: December 9, 2004    /s/ Steven J. Douglass   Steven J. Douglass Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
30