alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE  CONTAINS A SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM NEXT
GENERATION  TECHNOLOGY  HOLDINGS,  INC. F/K/A DELICIOUS BRANDS,  INC.  FINANCIAL
STATEMENT AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                        DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                           JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                             SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                                     2,255,633
<SECURITIES>                                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              1,736,532
<ALLOWANCES>                                               1,736,532
<INVENTORY>                                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           6,615,556
<PP&E>                                                             0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             7,949,556
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      2,654,821
<BONDS>                                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                              0
<PREFERRED>                                                5,216,668
<COMMON>                                                      57,518
<OTHER-SE>                                                  (147,103)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               7,949,556
<SALES>                                                   10,508,289
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          10,508,289
<CGS>                                                      7,701,178
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              7,701,178
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           7,132,374
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             290,233
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           432,552
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           10,062,162
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 300,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        9,762,162
<DISCONTINUED>                                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                    0
<CHANGES>                                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                               9,762,162
<EPS-BASIC>                                                     1.82
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   1.42


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 11

                 FRONTIER NATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE



The following tabulation presents the calculation of basic and diluted earnings
per common share for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30,
2000 and 1999.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                           Three Months Ended       Nine Months Ended
                                             September 30,            September 30,
                                         ----------------------  ----------------------
                                            2000        1999        2000        1999
                                         ----------  ----------  ----------  ----------
<S>                                      <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>
Basic Earnings Per Share:
 Net income.........................     $  428,526  $  612,768  $1,869,720  $1,191,204
                                         ==========  ==========  ==========  ==========

 Earnings on common shares..........     $  428,526  $  612,768  $1,869,720  $1,191,204
                                         ==========  ==========  ==========  ==========

 Weighted average common shares
  outstanding - basic...............      3,418,243   3,440,010   3,416,748   3,460,060
                                         ==========  ==========  ==========  ==========

 Basic earnings per common share....     $      .13  $      .15  $      .55  $      .49
                                         ==========  ==========  ==========  ==========

Diluted Earnings Per Share:
 Net income.........................     $  428,526  $  612,768  $1,869,720  $1,191,204
                                         ==========  ==========  ==========  ==========

 Weighted average common shares
  outstanding - diluted.............      3,492,566   3,485,010   3,485,083   3,505,060
                                         ==========  ==========  ==========  ==========

 Diluted earnings per common share..     $      .12  $      .15  $      .54  $      .49
                                         ==========  ==========  ==========  ==========

</TABLE>
# L

AW 

# O FFICES OF 

# K

EITH 

# P. M

ILLER 

# , P.C.

A TTORNEYS 

### & C OUNSELORS 

### A T 

### L AW

14350 N ORTHBROOK , S UITE 150 S AN A NTONIO , T EXAS 782 32 T ELEPHONE 210.524.9040 K EITH P. M ILLER F ACSIMILE 210 .267.2982 M EGAN K UCERA

May 11, 2015
Eloy R. Garcia, District Clerk ATTN: BRENDA LEE 401 N. Britton Avenue, Room 304 Rio Grande City, Texas 78582

Re: Cause No. DC- 09 -559; Ramiro & Edna Ramos and Federico Salazar, Jr.

vs. The Unknown Heirs of Tomasa Gonzalez and Narciso Gonzalez

Dear District Clerk :
Pursuant to Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(c), please supplement the Clerk’s Record with the documents relating to the citation by publication in this matter. More specifically, the February 3, 2010 affidavit of Rebecca G. Canales and the January 7, 2010 Corrected Notice by Citation by Publication, as well as all attachments thereto. Additionally, please supplement the Clerk’s Record with the return of citation for the following individuals:

 Adan Ramos

 Aissa Lynette Salazar

 Amelia Salazar Yunez

 Arabela Gonzalez

 Arlene Luccette Salazar

 Cindy Ramos-Ramos

 Dora Lisa Salazar Guerrero

 Efrain Ramos-Ramos

 Elia G. Garza

 Erica Guzman Uribe

 Gerardo Salazar

 Gilda Ramos

 Graciela Ramos-Guerra

 Hayde Correa

 Homero Hector Gonzalez

 Irma Salazar Cisneros

 Javier J. Gonzalez ACCEPTED 04-14-00667-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 5/11/2015 8:36:59 AM KEITH HOTTLE CLERK Javier Salinas

 Juan Manuel Garcia

 Juan Ramon Gonzales

 Maria Elia Gonzalez Garza

 Maria Eva Ramos

- Garcia

 Maria Del Carmen Salazar

 Maria Elsa Guttierez

 Maria Esther Gonzalez

 Maria Emma Bustamante

 Mario Cesar Gonzalez

 Melissa Sal azar Longoria

 Omar Garcia

 Pablo Ildefonso Gonzalez

 Roberto (Bobby) Salazar

 Rosa Enna Gonzales

 Sandra Becker

 Sergio L. Bustamante

 Socorro Gonzalez

 Sylvia Ramos

 Veronica Salazar Rivera
Of course, should you need additional information to process this reque st, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,

Megan Kucera
Megan Kucera

MK/mlc

cc: Keith E. Hottle, Clerk for the Fourth Court of Appeals
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

VICENTE CUELLAR

,

Appellant

,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 8

- 0 0133

- C R

Appeal from the

17 1st District Court

of El Paso County , Texas

(TC# 20160D04843 )

O R D E R

The reporter’s record was initially due to be filed on August 31, 2018

. T he Court has

granted four extension s of time to file the reporter’s record, most recently extending the filing

deadline until February 27, 2019. As of this date, the reporter’s record has not been filed.

Therefore, it is ORDERED that the trial court conduct a hearing to determine why the

reporter’s record has not been filed, and to make appropriate findings and recommendations. The

trial court shall forward its findings to the District Clerk of El Paso County, Texas, on or before

March 2 4 , 2019 . The District Clerk shall prepare and forward a supplemental clerk ’ s record

containing the trial court’s findings and forward the same to this Court on or before April 3 , 2019.

Further, the trial court’s reporter shall prepare, certify, and file the record of the trial court

proceedings with this Court on or before April 3 , 2019

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 4 th day of March

, 20 1 9

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., R odriguez and Palafox , JJ.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                     TWEETER HOME ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                     906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tweeter Home Entertainment Group,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Paul Burmeister, interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition of the Company as of June 30, 2005 and results
of operations of the Company for the three months ended June 30, 2005.

                                               /s/ Paul Burmeister
                                               -------------------------------
                                               Paul Burmeister
                                               interim Chief Financial Officer

                                               August 9, 2005
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Crop Production and Pest Control Research: West Lafayette, IN
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area West Lafayette, Indiana Crop Production and Pest Control Research Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications
- Small Grains Viral Disease Laboratory
- Corn and Sorghum Fungal Disease Laboratory
- Host Plant Resistance to Insects Laboratory
- Wheat/Hessian fly Interactions Laboratory
- Small Grains Fungal Disease Laboratory
- Soybean Quality Improvement Laboratory
- Uniform Soybean Tests, Northern Region

Research Projects Subjects of Investigation at this LocationEach ARS research project has related subjects of investigation.  Listed below are the subjects of investigation currently conducted at this location.
Clicking on a subject of investigation will list the research projects within that  subject of investigation.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2149

Reelcraft Industries:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

January 9, 2009 

1215 

Order 

 

January 9, 2009 

137472 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137472 

 COA: 286837 

Allegan CC: 07-015257-FH 

THOMAS CLAUDE KERN, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 4, 2008 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

 HATHAWAY, J., not participating.
#### STATE v. CHARLES BELTON HAWKINS.

(Filed 10 May, 1961.)

Appeal by defendant from *Hooks, S.J.,*October 23, 1960 Special Term of GastoN.

Defendant was charged in a bill of indictment containing two counts with (a) operating a motor vehicle on the public highway while under the influence of an intoxicating beverage, which operation was a second offense, and (b) operating a motor vehicle on a public highway while under the influence of some narcotic drug. There was no evidence tending to show conviction of a prior offense or the use of narcotic drugs.

The court submitted the case to the jury on the question of defendant’s guilt of operating a motor vehicle on a highway while under the influence of an intoxicating beverage. The jury returned a verdict of guilty. Prison sentence of two years was imposed, suspended with the consent of defendant upon condition that defendant pay a fine, costs, and abstain from the use of intoxicants for a defined time. Defendant appealed as permitted by G.S. 15-180.1.

*Attorney General Bruton and Assistant Attorney General Jones for the State.*

*Robert E. Gaines and Whitener ■& Mitchem for defendant appellant.*

PeR Cueiam.

The record contains twenty assignments of error. None conform to our rules. *Sanitary District v. Canoy, ante*630; *Hunt v. Davis,*248 N.C. 69, 102 S.E. 2d 405.

*679The refusal of the court to nonsuit is not assigned as error. Nonetheless, lack of sufficient credible evidence to establish guilt is asserted in the brief. Notwithstanding the failure to assign errors in the manner required by our rules or the failure to include in the assignments of error the refusal to allow the motion to nonsuit, we have examined the evidence and charge. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict. Our examination does not disclose prejudicial error.

No error.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2140

Reelcraft Industries:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
Opinion issued July 18 , 2024

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 24
- 00296
- CV

——————————— SHEILA FOSTER , Appella nt

V. SPRING HOSPITAL, HEIGHTS HOSPITAL AND NORTH HOUSTON

SU R GICAL HOSPITAL, LLC , Appell e e s
On Appeal from the 295th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 2022
- 81813

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Sheila Foster has neither established indigence, nor requested, paid , or made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); ), 37.3(b) (allowing dismissal of appeal if no clerk’s record filed due to appellant’s fault)

.2

On May 28, 2024, the Court issued a notice, advising appellant that failure to pay the fee for the clerk’s record or make payment arrangements for the preparation and filing of the clerk’s record could result in dismissal of this appeal

. See T EX
. R.
A PP
. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule) , 37.3(b) (allowing dismissal of appeal if no clerk’s record filed due to appellant’s fault) , 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case). Appellant did not respond to our notice concerning the clerk’s
record. Accordingly, w e dismiss the appeal. We dismiss any pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Kelly and Goodman.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 13, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3833

Cummins Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 20 2 4

- 1415

_____________________________
B RENDA G OSNEY and W ILLIAM G OSNEY ,
Petitioner s ,

v.

P HILLIP G RIFFITH and K IMBERL E Y G RIFFITH , Respondent s

.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Prohibition

— Original Jurisdiction

.

August 13, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
D ISMISSED

.
L EWIS , B.L. T HOMAS , and L ONG , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Doreen Turner Inkeles and Randall Mark Shochet of Shochet Law Group, Trenton
, for Petitioner s

. Jennifer Kerkhoff, Law Offices of Jennifer Kerkhoff, P.A., Chiefland, for Respondent s

.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-11642

S&C Electric Company:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel