15554 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 57 / Friday, March 24, 1995 / Notices

• Energy accounting and analysis;

• Life-cycle cost methodologies;

• Fuel supply and pricing; and,

• Instrumentation for energy surveys

and audits.

(2 days. No tuition fee.)

Designing Low Energy Building

Workshop for Non-Residential

Buildings

Formerly known as the Passive Solar

Design Strategy Workshop, the course

addresses whole building design,

stressing the integration of daylighting,

energy efficient equipment, and passive

solar design strategies. Case studies and

analysis for various climates are

included.

(2 days. No tuition fee.)

Designing Low Energy Building

Workshop for Residential Buildings

For personnel involved in the Federal

residential building design process, this

course can be tailored for your

installations and conducted there, as

requested and approved.

(1 day. No tuition fee.)

Life Cycle Costing/A Simplified Energy

Analysis Method (ASEAM) Workshop

Basic for all energy improvement

projects, the first two days of this course

include instruction in LCC economic

evaluation methods and an introduction

to LCC software use in project design,

sizing, and selection. Retrofit case

examples and class team problems will

be explored. The third day includes

hands-on instruction in the use of the

ASEAM software tool for simulating the

impact of energy retrofits in buildings.

A working knowledge of IBMcompatible microcomputers is required.

(3 days. No tuition fee.)

Federal Energy Decision Screening

(FEDS) Workshop

Designed for Federal agency-level and

installation-level energy managers who

want to identify cost-effective sitespecific energy system revitalization

projects. The workshop includes handson use of the FEDS level-1 analytical

software for site project screening and

prioritizing and FEDS level-2 software

for analyzing specific improvements.

(21⁄2 days. No tuition fee.)

Federal Relighting Initiative (FRI)

Workshop

The FRI workshop is targeted at

Federal personnel responsible for

lighting analysis, procurement,

planning, and the installation of lifecycle cost-effective technology. The

objective is to provide guidance on

energy-efficient lighting consistent with

other facility lighting considerations,

quality and cost, and whole building

analysis. Topics include:

• Basic lighting concepts; a

comprehensive process for Federal

relighting project development and

implementation;

• Application of the Federal Lighting

Expert (FLEX) System and other

analytical software tools; and,

• The use of professional lighting

design services.

An additional half-day is for hands-on

problem solving using software tools.

(21⁄2 days. No tuition fee.)

Energy Savings Performance (ESP)

Contracting

EPAct streamlined the process for

awarding shared energy savings

contracts through the use of ESP

contracting. This course places the ESP

approach in the context of other

financing options and will familiarize

technical facility management personnel

and procurement specialists with this

form of third party financing for

performing energy saving retrofits on

buildings. Course materials include

model solicitation on diskette. Topics

include: ESP concepts and statutory

basis, solicitation design and

preparation, proposal evaluation, and

contract implementation. Students will

look at case histories and discuss the

selection of candidate ESP project sites

and receive hands-on help for specific

projects they bring to the class.

(4 days. No tuition fee.)

Issued in Washington, DC on February 21,

1995.

Christine A. Ervin,

Assistant Secretary, Energy Efficiency and

Renewable Energy.

[FR Doc. 95–7365 Filed 3–23–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. ER95–706–000, et al.]

Central Hudson Gas and Electric

Corporation, et al., Electric Rate and

Corporate Regulation Filings

March 17, 1995.

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission:

1. Central Hudson Gas and Electric

Corporation

[Docket No. ER95–706–000]

Take notice that on March 6, 1995,

Central Hudson Gas and Electric

Corporation (CHG&E), tendered for

filing a Service Agreement between

CHG&E and CNG Power Services

Corporation. The terms and conditions

of service under this Agreement are

made pursuant to CHG&E’s FERC

Electric Rate Schedule, Original Volume

1 (Power Sales Tariff) accepted by the

Commission in Docket No. ER94–1662.

CHG&E also has requested waiver of the

60-day notice provision pursuant to 18

CFR 35.11.

A copy of this filing has been served

on the Public Service Commission of the

State of New York.

Comment date: April 3, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

2. Central Hudson Gas and Electric

Corporation

[Docket No. ER95–707–000]

Take notice that on March 6, 1995,

Central Hudson Gas and Electric

Corporation (CHG&E), tendered for

filing a Service Agreement between

CHG&E and Rochester Gas and Electric

Corporation. The terms and conditions

of service under this Agreement are

made pursuant to CHG&E’s FERC

Electric Rate Schedule, Original Volume

1 (‘‘Power Sales Tariff’’) accepted by the

Commission in Docket No. ER94–1662.

CHG&E also has requested waiver of the

60-day notice provision pursuant to 18

CFR 35.11.

A copy of this filing has been served

on the Public Service Commission of the

State of New York.

Comment date: April 3, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

3. Central Hudson Gas and Electric

Corporation

[Docket No. ER95–708–000]

Take notice that on March 6, 1995,

Central Hudson Gas and Electric

Corporation (CHG&E), tendered for

filing a Service Agreement between

CHG&E and Citizens Lehman Power

Sales. The terms and conditions of

service under this Agreement are made

pursuant to CHG&E’s FERC Electric Rate

Schedule, Original Volume 1 (Power

Sales Tariff) accepted by the

Commission in Docket No. ER94–1662.

CHG&E also has requested waiver of the

60-day notice provision pursuant to 18

CFR 35.11.

A copy of this filing has been served

on the Public Service Commission of the

State of New York.

Comment date: April 3, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

4. Arizona Public Service Company

[Docket No. ER95–710–000]

Take notice that on March 7, 1995,

Arizona Public Service Company (APS),
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 57 / Friday, March 24, 1995 / Notices 15555

tendered for filing a request for CIAC

treatment of certain facilities which are

required to be replaced pursuant to the

terms of the Mead-Phoenix Project

Westwing Substation Interconnection

Agreement (Agreement). The parties to

the Agreement are APS, The United

States of America, Salt River Project

Agricultural Improvement and Power

District, Department of Water and Power

of the City of Los Angeles, Nevada

Power Company, M-S-R Public Power

Agency, Southern California Public

Power Authority, Tucson Electric Power

Company, and City of Vernon.

In addition to all the Parties to this

Agreement copies of this filing have

been served upon El Paso Electric

Company, Public Service Company of

New Mexico, the Arizona Corporation

Commission, the New Mexico Public

Service Commission, the Public Utility

Commission of Texas, and the Nevada

Public Service Commission.

Comment date: April 3, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

5. Entergy Services, Inc.

[Docket No. ER95–712–000]

Take notice that on March 7, 1995,

Entergy Services, Inc. (Entergy

Services), on behalf of Arkansas Power

& Light Company, Gulf States Utilities

Company, Louisiana Power & Light

Company, Mississippi Power & Light

Company, and New Orleans Public

Service Inc., tendered for filing a

Transmission Service Agreement (TSA)

between Entergy Services and Entergy

Power, Inc. (EPI). Entergy Services states

that the TSA sets out the transmission

arrangements under which the Entergy

Operating Companies will provide EPI

non-firm transmission service under

Entergy Services Transmission Service

Tariff.

Comment date: April 3, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

6. American Electric Power Service

Corporation

[Docket No. ER95–713–000]

Take notice that on March 8, 1995, the

American Electric Power Service

Corporation (AEPSC), tendered for

filing, as initial Rate Schedules,

Agreements dated December 1, 1994,

and January 1, 1995, between AEPSC, as

agent for the AEP System Operating

Companies and the following

companies: InterCoast Power Marketing

Company and CNG Power Services

Corporation (Marketers).

The Agreements provide the

Marketers access to the AEP System for

short-term transmission service. The

parties request an effective date of

March 9, 1995.

A copy of the filing was served upon

the state regulatory commissions of

Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio,

Tennessee, Virginia and West Virginia,

and the Marketers.

Comment date: April 3, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

7. Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc.

[Docket No. ER95–714–000]

Take notice that on March 8, 1995,

Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc.

(O&R), tendered for filing an

amendment to § 3 of the Agreement

between Orange and Rockland Utilities,

Inc. and Long Island Lighting Company

(LILCO) dated April 27, 1976.

O&R states that a copy of this filing

has been served by mail upon LILCO.

Comment date: April 3, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

8. Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc.

[Docket No. ER95–715–000]

Take notice that on March 8, 1995,

Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc.

(Orange and Rockland), tendered for

filing an extension dated December 1,

1994, to an agreement between Orange

and Rockland and New York Power

Authority (Authority) for the sale of

system capacity and/or energy by

Orange and Rockland to Authority.

Orange and Rockland requests waiver

of the notice requirements of Part 35.3

of the Commission’s Regulations so that

the proposed rate schedule can be made

effective December 1, 1994 in

accordance with the anticipated

utilization by the parties.

Orange and Rockland states that a

copy of its filing was served on New

York Power Authority.

Comment date: April 3, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

9. Gordonsville Energy, L.P. (Unit I and

Unit II)

[Docket Nos. QF92–166–005, QF92–167–005

and EL95–32–000]

Take notice that on March 10, 1995,

Gordonsville Energy, L.P.,

(Gordonsville) tendered for filing a

Petition For Temporary Waiver of the

Commission’s Regulations under the

Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of

1978 (PURPA). Gordonsville requests

the Commission to temporarily waive

the operating and efficiency standards

for qualifying cogenerating facilities as

set forth in Section 292.205, 18 CFR

292.205 of the Commission’s

Regulations implementing Section 201

of PURPA, as amended, with respect to

its cogeneration facilities located near

Gordonsville, Virginia. Specifically,

Gordonsville requests waiver of the

operating and efficiency standards for

the calendar years of 1994 and 1995.

Comment date: April 24, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

10. Birchwood Power Partners, L.P.

[Docket No. QF93–126–001]

On March 13, 1995, Birchwood Power

Partners, L.P. (Applicant), of 900

Ashwood Parkway, Suite 500, Atlanta,

Georgia 30338–4780, submitted for

filing an application for recertification

of a facility as a qualifying cogeneration

facility pursuant to Section 292.207(b)

of the Commission’s Regulations. No

determination has been made that the

submittal constitutes a complete filing.

According to Applicant, the toppingcycle cogeneration facility will be

located on Birchwood Drive, in

Sealston, Virginia. The Commission

previously certified the facility as a

qualifying cogeneration facility in

Birchwood Power Partners, L.P., 65

FERC ¶62,048 (1993). The instant

request for recertification is due to a

change in ownership of the facility.

Comment date: April 24, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs

E. Any person desiring to be heard or

to protest said filing should file a

motion to intervene or protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street, N.E.,

Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance

with Rules 211 and 214 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR

385.214). All such motions or protests

should be filed on or before the

comment date. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–7309 Filed 3–23–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P