Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 56 / Thursday, March 23, 1995 / Rules and Regulations 15247

(b) (1) The electronic evaporative

emission purge control, if equipped, and

all emission-related powertrain

components connected to a computer

shall, at a minimum, be monitored for

circuit continuity. In lieu of monitoring

circuit continuity, a functional system

check may be performed provided the

manufacturer can demonstrate that the

functional check is equivalent or

superior to the circuit continuity

monitor. All components required by

these regulations to be monitored shall

be evaluated periodically, but no less

frequently than once per Urban

Dynamometer Driving Schedule as

defined in appendix I, paragraph (a), of

this part, or similar trip.

* * * * *

(e) * * *

(2) For a single misfiring cylinder, the

fault code(s) shall identify the cylinder,

unless the manufacturer submits data

and/or an engineering evaluation which

adequately demonstrate that the

misfiring cylinder cannot be reliably

identified under certain operating

conditions; multiple misfiring cylinders

need not be uniquely identified if a

distinct multiple misfire fault code is

stored.

* * * * *

(f) * * *

(3) For all emission control

components and systems for which

specific on-board evaluation tests are

conducted (catalyst, oxygen sensor,

etc.), the results of the most recent test

performed by the vehicle, and the limits

to which the system is compared shall

be available through the data link per

SAE J1979 specifications as referenced

in paragraph (h) of this section

beginning no later than the 1997 model

year. The Administrator may allow a

pass/fail indication for the most recent

test results for those monitored

components and systems for which such

an indication is more appropriate (e.g.,

misfire detection, fuel system

monitoring, etc.).

* * * * *

(i) Upon application by the

manufacturer, the Administrator may

either waive the requirements of this

section for specific components of any

class or category of light-duty vehicles

or light-duty trucks for model years

1994 or 1995 (or both), or, through the

1998 model year, the Administrator may

accept an OBD system as compliant

even though specific requirements are

not fully met. Such waivers or

compliances without meeting specific

requirements will be granted only if

compliance would be infeasible or

unreasonable considering such factors

as, but not limited to, technical

feasibility, lead time and production

cycles including phase-in or phase-out

of engines or vehicle designs and

programmed upgrades of computers,

and if any unmet requirements are not

carried over from the previous model

year except where unreasonable

hardware modifications would be

necessary to correct the noncompliance,

and the manufacturer has demonstrated

an acceptable level of effort toward

compliance as determined by the

Administrator. For alternative fueled

vehicles (i.e., natural gas, liquified

petroleum gas, or methanol), beginning

with the model year for which emission

standards are applicable and extending

through the 1998 model year,

manufacturers may request the

Administrator to waive specific

monitoring requirements of this section

for which monitoring may not be

reliable with respect to the use of the

alternative fuel. At a minimum, all

vehicles covered by this section,

including those receiving a waiver as

described in this paragraph, shall be

equipped with an OBD system meeting

either the California OBD I

requirements, or some acceptable

portion of the California OBD II or

federal OBD requirements as specified

in this section, except that for the 1994

and 1995 model years EPA may grant a

waiver to a system less than OBD I

giving consideration to such factors as

manufacturer projections of very low

sales volume for an engine family (e.g.,

5000 or less), scheduled phase-out of

significant engine technology with the

1994 or 1995 model years for that

engine family, and whether or not the

engine, or any similar engine within the

manufacturer’s product line, has ever

been equipped with an OBD I or similar

OBD system.

(j) Demonstration of compliance with

California OBD II requirements (Title 13

California Code 1968.1), as modified

pursuant to California Mail Out #95–03

(January 19, 1995), shall satisfy the

requirements of this section through the

1998 model year except that compliance

with Title 13 California Code 1968.1(d),

pertaining to tampering protection, is

not required to satisfy the requirements

of this section.

§ 86.094–18 [Removed].

3. Section 86.094–18 is removed.

4. Section 86.094–30 is amended by

revising paragraph (f)(4) to read as

follows:

§ 86.094–30 Certification.

* * * * *

(f) * * *

(4) The electronic evaporative purge

control device (if equipped) is

disconnected or the operation of any

emission-related powertrain component

connected to a computer results in an

increase in emissions of 0.2 g/mi HC or

1.7 g/mi CO or 0.5 g/mi NOx on a

normal temperature (20 to 30 °C)

emission certification test.

5. Section 86.095–30 is amended by

revising paragraph (f)(4) to read as

follows:

§ 86.095–30 Certification.

* * * * *

(f) * * *

(4) The electronic evaporative purge

control device (if equipped) is

disconnected or the operation of any

emission-related powertrain component

connected to a computer results in an

increase in emissions of 0.2 g/mi HC or

1.7 g/mi CO or 0.5 g/mi NOx on a

normal temperature (20 to 30 °C)

emission certification test.

[FR Doc. 95–6272 Filed 3–22–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

40 CFR Part 300

[FRL–5176–9]

National Oil and Hazardous

Substances Pollution Contingency

Plan; National Priorities List Update

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency.

ACTION: Notice of deletion of the Crystal

City Airport Superfund Site (Site) from

the National Priorities List.

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA) announces the deletion of

the Site in Crystal City, Texas, from the

National Priorities List (NPL). The NPL

is Appendix B of 40 CFR Part 300 which

is the National Oil and Hazardous

Substances Pollution Contingency Plan

(NCP), which EPA promulgated

pursuant to Section 105 of the

Comprehensive Environmental

Response, Compensation, and Liability

Act of 1980, as amended (CERCLA).

EPA and the State of Texas have

determined that all appropriate Fundfinanced responses under CERCLA have

been implemented and that no further

cleanup by responsible parties is

appropriate. Moreover, EPA and the

State of Texas have determined that

remedial actions conducted at the Site

to date have been protective of public

health, welfare, and the environment.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 23, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ernest R. Franke, Remedial Project

Manager, US EPA, Region 6, 1445 Ross

Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733,

(214) 665–8521.
15248 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 56 / Thursday, March 23, 1995 / Rules and Regulations

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Site

to be deleted from the NPL is the

‘‘Crystal City Airport Superfund Site,’’

Crystal City, Texas. A Notice of Intent

to Delete for this Site was published on

January 4, 1995 (60 FR 422). The closing

date for public comment was February

3, 1995. EPA received no comments

during the comment period.

EPA identifies sites which appear to

present a significant risk to public

health, welfare, or the environment and

maintains the NPL as a list of the most

serious of those sites. Sites on the NPL

may be the subject of remedial response

actions financed using the Hazardous

Substance Response Trust Fund (Fund).

Any site deleted from the NPL remains

eligible for Fund-financed remedial

actions in the unlikely event that

conditions at the site warrant such

action. Section 300.425(e)(3) of the NCP,

provides that in the event of a

significant release from a site deleted

from the NPL, the site shall be restored

to the NPL without application of the

Hazard Ranking System. Deletion of a

site from the NPL does not affect

responsible party liability or impede

agency efforts to recover costs

associated with response actions.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300

Environmental protection, Hazardous

waste.

Dated: March 6, 1995.

William B. Hathaway,

Acting Regional Administrator,

Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6.

For the reasons setout in the

preamble, 40 CFR part 300 is amended

as follows:

PART 300—[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for part 300

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 9601–9657; 33 U.S.C.

1321(d); E.O. 11735, 38 FR 21243; E.O.

12580; 52 FR 2923; E.O. 12777, 56 FR 54757.

Appendix B—[Amended]

2. Table 1 of Appendix B to part 300

is amended by removing Crystal City

Airport Superfund Site, Crystal City,

Texas.

[FR Doc. 95–7197 Filed 3–22–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

43 CFR Public Land Order—7125

[AK–932–1430–01; AA–2793, J–010160]

Partial Revocation of Public Land

Order No. 829 and Public Land Order

No. 1731; Alaska

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management,

Interior.

ACTION: Public land order.

SUMMARY: This order revokes two public

land orders insofar as they affect

approximately 468.81 acres of National

Forest System lands withdrawn for use

by the Forest Service, Department of

Agriculture, for the Herbert River Public

Service Site and the Mill Creek

Industrial Area. The lands are no longer

needed for the purposes for which they

were withdrawn. This action also allows

the conveyance of the lands to the State

of Alaska, if such lands are otherwise

available. Any lands described herein

that are not conveyed to the State are

opened and will be subject to the terms

and conditions of the national forest

reservation and any other withdrawal of

record.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 23, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sue

A. Wolf, BLM Alaska State Office, 222

W. 7th Avenue, No. 13, Anchorage,

Alaska 99513–7599, 907–271–5477.

By virtue of the authority vested in

the Secretary of the Interior by Section

204 of the Federal Land Policy and

Management Act of 1976, 43 U.S.C.

1714 (1988), it is ordered as follows:

1. Public Land Order No. 829 and

Public Land Order No. 1731, which

withdrew lands for use by the Forest

Service as administrative sites,

recreation areas, or for other public

purposes, are hereby revoked insofar as

they affect the following described

lands:

Copper River Meridian

Tongass National Forest

(a) Public Land Order No. 829 (AA–2793).

T. 38 S., R. 64 E.,

Sec. 35, lots 5, 7, and 8;

Sec. 36, lot 6.

The area described contains 132.81 acres.

(b) Public Land Order No. 1731 (J–010160).

A parcel of land located within sec. 25 of

T. 62 S., R. 84 E., and secs. 30 and 31 of T.

62 S., R. 85 E., more particularly described

as:

Beginning at U S C & G Station ‘‘Virgin’’

located at Mill Creek on the east shore of

Eastern Passage, thence;

East, 1⁄4 mile;

North, 11⁄2 miles;

West, 1 mile to U S C & G Station ‘‘Mill’’;

Southerly, along line of mean high tide of

Eastern Passage to point of beginning.

The area described contains approximately

336 acres.

The areas describes aggregate

approximately 468.81 acres.

2. The State of Alaska applications for

selection made under Section 6(a) of the

Alaska Statehood Act of July 7, 1958, 48

U.S.C. note prec. 21 (1988), and under

Section 906(e) of the Alaska National

Interest Lands Conservation Act, 43

U.S.C. 1635(e) (1988), become effective

without further action by the State upon

publication of this public land order in

the Federal Register, if such lands are

otherwise available. Lands not conveyed

to the State are opened and will be

subject to the terms and conditions of

the Tongass National Forest reservation

and any other withdrawal of record.

Dated: March 13, 1995.

Bob Armstrong,

Assistant Secretary of the Interior.

[FR Doc. 95–7153 Filed 3–22–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–JA–P

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

47 CFR Parts 2 and 90

[PR Docket No. 93–61; FCC 95–41]

Automatic Vehicle Monitoring Systems

AGENCY: Federal Communications

Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: This rule making proceeding

adopts rules for the future licensing and

continued development of a number of

services and equipment using the 902–

928 MHz band. In recent years,

Automatic Vehicle Monitoring (AVM)

systems and unlicensed Part 15 devices

have developed and proliferated in this

band and are providing services that are

valuable and in the public interest.

These services range from licensed

vehicle location and automatic toll

collection systems to unlicensed devices

used for utility meter reading and

inventory control. The adopted

allocation plan for the 902–928 MHz

band includes 8 MHz of additional

spectrum for AVM services and

establishes new provisions for

governing the interference obligations of

Part 15 and amateur operations in this

band. This plan balances the differing

operational needs of these varied types

of uses so that most AVM systems and

Part 15 devices will be able to achieve

their service objectives without

impeding each other’s use of the

spectrum. The adopted rules also