alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

N OTICE

Appellate case name: Carolyn Sovann v. Residence at Garden Oaks

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 8

- 00 4 6 5

- CV

Trial court case number: 1 11 0 18 3

Trial court: County Civil Court at Law No. 3 of Harris County

A ppellant, Carolyn Sovann

, has filed a n otice of a ppeal of the trial court’s final judgment signed on May 29 , 201 8

. The clerk’s record filed in this Court includes appellant’s “Statement of Inability to Afford Payment of Court Costs or an Appeal Bond
in Justice Court ” filed in the trial court proceeding s

. See T EX

. R. C IV

. P. 145(a), (b) , (d) ; see also T EX

. R. C IV

. P. 502.3 , 510.9(c)

. The clerk’s record does not reflect that a ny motion to require appellant to pay costs or any contest to appellant’s statement was filed.
See id. 145(f) , 502.3(d) , 510.9(c)(2)

. Accordingly, t he Clerk of this Court is directed to make an entry in this
Court’ s records that appellant is allowed to proceed on appeal without payment of

costs. See id. 145(a), (c) ; T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.1.

Appellant also has filed “a motion to stay” in which she seeks additional time to

pay the required fees. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 5. Because appellant may proceed on appeal without payment of costs, the motion is dismissed as moot

.

Judge’s signature: / s/ Russell Lloyd

 Acting for the Court

Date: June 1 9 , 2018
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-2916

National Presto Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
Exhibit 32.3





CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In connection with the Annual Report of Ener1, Inc., a Florida corporation (the Company), on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), Robert R. Kamischke, Chief Accounting Officer and Vice President of Finance of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Robert R. KamischkeRobert R. KamischkeChief Accounting Officer and Vice President of Finance(Duly Authorized Principal Accounting Officer and Duly Authorized Officer)





March 10, 2011





[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Ener1, Inc. and will be retained by Ener1, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
Exhibit 31.1

I, James F. Robinson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A for the
year ended September 30, 2011 of Tufco Technologies, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

Date: March 30, 2012



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ James F. Robinson                
|James F. Robinson                    
|President and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 59 (Tuesday, March 28, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15933]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7615]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 94D-0407]


Miscellaneous Compliance Policy Guides; Revocation

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the 
revocation of two compliance policy guides (CPG's) because they are 
outdated. This action is being taken to ensure that FDA's CPG's are 
accurate and current.

DATES: Effective March 28, 1995.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Judith A. Gushee, Center for 
Veterinary Medicine (HFV-236), Food and Drug Administration, 7500 
Standish Place, Rockville, MD 20855, 301-594-1785.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FDA is revoking the following CPG's because 
they are outdated:
    (1) CPG 7126.06 ``State Analysis of Animal Feed for Protein, Fat, 
and Fiber Content,'' and
    (2) CPG 7126.14 ``Protein in Animal Feeds.''
    These CPG's were intended to assist the States in enforcing their 
requirements for guaranteed analysis labeling claims when their 
regulatory authority was insufficient. However, State regulatory 
authority is sufficient, and the States have not required use of these 
CPG's for a number of years. Futhermore, if FDA regulatory action is 
required, the agency has ample authority. Therefore, FDA is revoking 
CPG's 7126.06 and 7126.14 because they are outdated.

    Dated: March 13, 1995.
Gary Dykstra,
Acting Associate Commissioner for Regulatory Affairs.
[FR Doc. 95-7615 Filed 3-27-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUL-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-31-2001
<CASH>                                           2,565,260
<SECURITIES>                                    29,353,887
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,056,854
<PP&E>                                           3,515,976
<DEPRECIATION>                                     246,527
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  39,453,737
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,068,763
<BONDS>                                            692,584
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              2
<COMMON>                                        75,128,649
<OTHER-SE>                                         (55,949)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    37,692,390
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,000,000
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,017,724
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  33,927
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (15,349,512)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (15,349,512)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (.85)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.85)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4981 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4981

To prohibit authority to provide financial assistance for, or approve, 
 tolling on Interstate Route 5 or Interstate Route 205 in the State of 
                 Oregon under certain tolling programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 2023

 Mrs. Chavez-DeRemer introduced the following bill; which was referred 
         to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit authority to provide financial assistance for, or approve, 
 tolling on Interstate Route 5 or Interstate Route 205 in the State of 
                 Oregon under certain tolling programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Tolls on Oregon Roads Act of 
2023''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR TOLLING ON INTERSTATE ROUTE 5 
              OR INTERSTATE ROUTE 205.

    (a) Congestion Relief Program.--Section 129(d)(6) of title 23, 
United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(D) Exception.--The Secretary shall not allow the 
                use of tolls on Interstate Route 5 or Interstate Route 
                205 in the State of Oregon as part of a project carried 
                out with a grant under the program.''.
    (b) Toll Roads, Bridges, Tunnels, and Ferries.--Section 129 of 
title 23, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
    ``(e) Prohibition on Tolling on Certain Interstates.--
Notwithstanding this section or any other provision of law, the 
Secretary may not approve Federal participation in the tolling of 
Interstate Route 5 or Interstate Route 205 in the State of Oregon.''.
    (c) Value Pricing Pilot Program.--Section 1012(b)(4) of the 
Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (23 U.S.C. 129 
note(b)) is amended by inserting ``, except that the Secretary shall 
not allow tolling of Interstate Route 5 or Interstate Route 205 in the 
State of Oregon'' before the period at the end.
                                 <all>
```
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 22-12317

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DEANDRE MITCHELL GABRIEL, 

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

D.C. Docket No. 1:21-cr-20324-JEM-4

____________________

USCA11 Case: 22-12317 Document: 35-1 Date Filed: 07/12/2023 Page: 1 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 22-12317

Before NEWSOM, GRANT, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Adam Goodman, appointed counsel for Deandre Gabriel in 

this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further 

representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders 

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the 

entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit 

of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the 

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion 

to withdraw is GRANTED, and Gabriel’s conviction and sentence 

are AFFIRMED. 

USCA11 Case: 22-12317 Document: 35-1 Date Filed: 07/12/2023 Page: 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          15,739
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,586
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,634
<PP&E>                                         187,413
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,739
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 201,418
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,030
<BONDS>                                        115,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      83,388
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   201,418
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,046
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,748
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,023
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,275
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,275
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0 
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,275 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 15

- 00018

- CR

Charles Anthony LHERAULT

, Appellant

v.

The State

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR10281

Honorable Mary D. Roman, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE ANGELINI , AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the AFFIRM the trial court’s judgment.

SIGNED September 30, 2015.

_____________________________ Jason Pulliam, Justice
# Exhibit 21.1Ener1, Inc. Subsidiaries

|Name                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      | Jurisdiction of Incorporation                                                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Boca Global, Inc.                        
Boca Research International, Inc.        
Boca Research Holland B.V.               
Boca Research of Delaware, Inc.          
Boca Research (UK) Limited               
Boca Research International Holding, Ltd.
AppsCom, Inc.                            
Enernow Technologies, Inc.               
EnerLook Solutions, Inc.                 
Ener1 Technologies, Inc.                 
Ener1 Battery Company | Florida
United States Virgin Island
Holland
Delaware
United Kingdom
Mauritius
Florida
Florida
Florida
Florida
Florida
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3315

ECM Industries LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_5-30-2019.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 54 (Tuesday, March 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 14999]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6973]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of the Secretary


List of Countries Requiring Cooperation With an International 
Boycott

    In order to comply with the mandate of section 999(a)(3) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, the Department of the Treasury is 
publishing a current list of countries which may require participation 
in, or cooperation with, an international boycott (within the meaning 
of section 999(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986).
    On the basis of the best information currently available to the 
Department of the Treasury, the following countries may require 
participation in, or cooperation with, an international boycott (within 
the meaning of section 999(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986):

Bahrain
Iraq
Jordan
Kuwait
Lebanon
Libya
Oman
Qatar
Saudi Arabia
Syria
United Arab Emirates
Yemen, Republic of

    Dated: March 13, 1995.
Joseph Guttentag,
International Tax Counsel.
[FR Doc. 95-6973 Filed 3-20-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-25-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 55 (Wednesday, March 22, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15121]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7019]



========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 22, 1995 / 
Notices
[[Page 15121]]

ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION


Notice of Meeting

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby give that the Advisory Council on Historic 
Preservation will meet on Wednesday, March 29, 1995, in Room 5160 at 
the Department of the Interior Main Building, 1849 C Street NW., 
Washington DC beginning at 1:30 p.m.
    The Council was established by the National Historic Preservation 
Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C. Section 470) to advise the President and the 
Congress on matters relating to historic preservation and to comment 
upon Federal, federally assisted, and federally licensed undertakings 
having an effect upon properties listed in or eligible for inclusion in 
the National Register of Historic Places. The Council's members are the 
Architect of the Capitol; the Secretaries of the Interior, Agriculture, 
Housing and Urban Development, and Transportation; the Administrators 
of the Environmental Protection Agency and General Services 
Administration; the Chairman of the National Trust for Historic 
Preservation; the President of the National Conference of State 
Historic Preservation Officers; a Governor; a Mayor; a Native American; 
and eight non-Federal members appointed by the President.
    The agenda for the meeting includes the following:

I. Chairman's Welcome/Opening
II. Discussion of the Draft Policy Statement on Affordable Housing
III. Discussion of the Proposed Regulations Revisions
IV. Section 106 Cases
V. Executive Director's Report
VI. New Business
VII. Adjourn

    Note: The meetings of the Council are open to the public. If you 
need special accommodations due to a disability, please contact the 
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue 
NW, Room 809, Washington, DC 202-606-8503, at least seven (7) days 
prior the meeting.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:Additional information concerting the 
meeting is available from the Executive Director, Advisory Council on 
Historic Preservation, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, #809, Washington, 
DC 20004.

    Dated: March 17, 1995.
Robert D. Bush,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 95-7019 Filed 3-21-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-10-M