alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 56 (Thursday, March 23, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15287]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7084]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Partnership Council Meeting

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense (DOD) announces a meeting of the 
Defense Partnership Council. Notice of this meeting is required under 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act. This meeting is open to the public. 
The topics to be covered are criteria for assessing successful 
partnerships and partnership successes within DOD.

DATES: The meeting is to be held Wednesday April 5, 1995, in room 
1E801, Conference Room 4 the Pentagon from 1 p.m. until 3 p.m. Comments 
should be received by March 29, 1995, in order to be considered at the 
April 5 meeting.

ADDRESSES: We invite interested persons and organizations to submit 
written comments or recommendations. Mail or deliver your comments or 
recommendations to Mr. Kenneth Oprisko at the address shown below. 
Seating is limited and available on a first-come, first-served basis. 
Individuals wishing to attend who do not possess an appropriate 
Pentagon building pass should call the below listed telephone number to 
obtain instructions for entry into the Pentagon. Handicapped 
individuals wishing to attend should also call the below listed 
telephone number to obtain appropriate accommodations.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Kenneth Oprisko, Chief, Labor Relations Branch, Field Advisory 
Services Division, Civilian Personnel Management Service, 2461 
Eisenhower Ave., Hoffman Building #1, Suite 152, Alexandria, VA 22331-
0900, (703) 325-1380.

    Dated: March 17, 1995.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense
[FR Doc. 95-7084 Filed 3-22-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 1060242    
<NAME> IMPERIAL HOME DECOR GROUP INC.
       
<S>                             <C>                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1997                DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1997                JUN-27-1998
<CASH>                                        3,795                      6,018
<SECURITIES>                                      0                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                55,160                    103,725
<ALLOWANCES>                                  1,758                      3,935
<INVENTORY>                                  59,479                    118,668
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            138,816                    276,775
<PP&E>                                      125,469                    103,223
<DEPRECIATION>                               58,729                    110,096
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              239,634                    415,209
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        61,558                    145,817
<BONDS>                                           0                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       163,800                         59
<PREFERRED>                                  30,389                          0
<COMMON>                                        200                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  (27,656)                   (77,386)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                239,634                    415,209
<SALES>                                     372,738                    215,030
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            372,738                    215,030
<CGS>                                       242,718                    146,315
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                96,551                     69,779
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0                     11,340
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                0                      9,902 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              33,772                    (22,306)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 11,384                        124
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          22,388                    (22,430)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0                          0
<CHANGES>                                         0                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                 22,388                    (22,430)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0                          0
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2








Certification of CFO Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of GAMCO Investors, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Robert S. Zuccaro, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Robert S. Zuccaro


Name: Robert S. Zuccaro


Title:   Chief Financial Officer


Date:   August 2, 2011





This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Walter Edward PRESCOTT, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 67413.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

March 5, 1996.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 11, 1996.

Application to Transfer Denied May 28, 1996.

Gerald L. Birnbaum, O’Fallon, Lester W. Duggan, Jr., St. Charles, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Christine M. Kocot, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRAHAN, P.J., and CRANDALL and DOWD, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from his judgments of conviction, following a jury trial, for seven counts of sodomy, § 566.060, RSMo, Supp. 1992. The court sentenced defendant in accordance with the jury’s recommendation to seven consecutive terms totaling 115 years’ imprisonment. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 49 (Tuesday, March 14, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 13734]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6195]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Processes for the Production of Steel From Iron 
Carbide and Related Technologies

    Notice is hereby given that, on January 5, 1995, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the parties to a 
cooperative research and production venture relating to processes for 
the production of steel from iron carbide and related technologies has 
filed a notification simultaneously with the Attorney General and the 
Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the parties 
and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The notifications 
were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting 
the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of 
the parties are: U.S. Steel Group, a unit of USX Corporation, 
Pittsburgh, PA; Nucor Corporation, Charlotte, NC; and Praxair, Inc., 
Danbury, CT. None of the parties are controlled by any other person. 
The nature and objectives of the venture are to jointly conduct a 
feasibility study of a specific process for producing low-carbon alloys 
(steel) from iron carbide (the ``Process''). If the feasibility study 
is successful, the venture will design, construct and operate a plant 
to demonstrate the feasibility of the Process (the ``Demonstration 
Plant'').
    The venture will involve the testing of steel produced at the 
plant; the collection, exchange and analysis of research and production 
data and information obtained from operating the plant and concerning 
the Process, the iron carbide processed and steel produced at the 
plant; improvements and modifications to the Process; and development 
of related processes for the production of steel from iron carbide. The 
venture will also prosecute patent applications (domestic and foreign) 
covering the Process, improvements and related processes, and will hold 
title to such patents. The venture will license its patents and 
unpatented technology to third persons.
    The parties have executed a Letter of Intent, dated as of October 
5, 1994, which contemplates that they will enter into a written 
definitive agreement concerning the venture. No written definitive 
agreement has yet been executed.
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 95-6195 Filed 3-13-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4234 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to make improvements 

to the redistribution of residency slots under the Medicare program 

after a hospital closes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 17, 2022 

Ms. ROSEN (for herself and Mr. BOOZMAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to make 

improvements to the redistribution of residency slots 

under the Medicare program after a hospital closes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Physicians for Under5 served Areas Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 4234 IS

1 SEC. 2. IMPROVEMENTS TO THE REDISTRIBUTION OF RESI2 DENCY SLOTS UNDER THE MEDICARE PRO3 GRAM AFTER A HOSPITAL CLOSES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1886(h)(4)(H)(vi) of the 

5 Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(h)(4)(H)(vi)) is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) in subclause (II)— 

8 (A) by striking item (cc) and redesignating 

9 item (dd) as item (cc); and 

10 (B) in item (cc), as redesignated under 

11 subparagraph (A)— 

12 (i) by striking ‘‘Fourth’’ and inserting 

13 ‘‘Third’’; and 

14 (ii) by striking ‘‘item (cc)’’ and insert15 ing ‘‘item (bb)’’; and 

16 (2) in subclause (III), by striking ‘‘likelihood of 

17 filling’’ and all that follows and inserting the fol18 lowing: ‘‘likelihood of— 

19 ‘‘(aa) starting to utilize the 

20 positions made available under 

21 this clause within 2 years; and 

22 ‘‘(bb) filling the positions 

23 made available under this clause 

24 within 5 years.’’. 

25 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

26 subsection (a) shall apply to the redistribution of residency 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 4234 IS

1 slots with respect to hospitals that close on or after the 

2 date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
#### LOUISE WILSON, by Her Next Friend, NELL DALTON, v. E. H. POSEY, Trading and Doing Business as PARKWAY CLEANERS AND LAUNDRY.

(Filed 5 March, 1941.)

Bailment § 6—

Where plaintiff alleges a bailment for hire on the part of defendant dry cleaning company in accepting plaintiff’s coat to be cleaned, and defendant’s failure to return the coat, hut the complaint fails to contain a sufficient allegation of special damages, plaintiff’s recovery should be confined to the fair market value of the coat as of the date it was delivered to defendant.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Armstrong, J.,*at August Term, 1940, of BuNcombe.

Affirmed.

Plaintiff delivered to tbe defendant a winter coat to be cleaned. Tbe coat was lost and never returned. Plaintiff instituted tbis action in tbe county court of Buncombe County to recover damages, alleging tbe value of tbe coat to be $22.50, and alleging, further, inconvenience, loss of time from school and tbe like.

At tbe trial in tbe county court, defendant requested, in writing, special instruction as follows: “That in no event would tbe jury be authorized to answer tbe issue in an amount exceeding tbe fair market value of tbe coat as of tbe date tbe same was delivered to tbe defendant, and tbe court charges tbe Jury that in no event could tbe Jury award tbe plaintiff an amount exceeding $22.50.”

Tbe court declined to give tbis instruction but gave certain other instructions which would permit a larger recovery. There was a verdict and judgment for tbe plaintiff in tbe sum of $70.00. Defendant appealed assigning error.

When tbe cause came on to be beard in tbe court below tbe judge sustained, among others, defendant’s assignment of error directed to tbe *262refusal of the court to give the tendered prayer for instruction, and ordered a new trial. Plaintiff excepted and appealed.

*Don G. Toung for plaintiff, appellant.*

*Jones, Ward & Jones for defendant, appellee.*

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff alleges a bailment for hire, and there is no sufficient allegation of special damage. The failure of the judge of the county court to instruct the jury on the measure of damages as prayed by the defendant was prejudicial error and the court below properly so held.

The judgment below is

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 56 (Thursday, March 23, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15305]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7127]



[[Page 15305]]

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION

[Finance Docket No. 32671]


Springfield Terminal Railway Company, Trackage Rights Exemption; 
Eastern Maine Railway Company

    Eastern Maine Railway Company (EMR) has agreed to grant overhead 
trackage rights to Springfield Terminal Railway Company (ST) over 
approximately 56.39 miles of rail line from milepost 5.61 at the Maine/
New Brunswick, Canada border near Vanceboro, ME to milepost 62.00 at 
Mattawamkeag, ME.<SUP>1 The trackage rights were to become effective on 
March 10, 1995.

    \1\EMR, the owner of the line, has granted ST the right to 
operate its own trains with its own crews between Mattawamkeag and 
the Maine/New Brunswick border to enable ST to exchange traffic with 
the New Brunswick Southern Railroad.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice is filed under 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(7). If the notice 
contains false or misleading information, the exemption is void ab 
initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10505(d) may 
be filed at any time. The filing of a petition to revoke will not stay 
the transaction. Pleadings must be filed with the Commission and served 
on: John R. Nadolny, Springfield Terminal Railway Company, Iron Horse 
Park, North Billerica, MA 01862.
    As a condition to use of this exemption, any employees adversely 
affected by the trackage rights will be protected under Norfolk and 
Western Ry. Co.--Trackage Rights--BN, 354 I.C.C. 605 (1978), as 
modified in Mendocino Coast Ry., Inc.--Lease and Operate, 360 I.C.C. 
653 (1980).

    Decided: March 16, 1995.

    By the Commission, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-7127 Filed 3-22-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7035-01-P
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-50444 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ARTURO QUEZADA SAENZ, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. P-98-CR-14-2

- - - - - - - - - - February 1, 1999 Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Arturo Saenz appeals his conviction of possession with intent to distribute marijuana. He argues that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict that he possessed the marijuana and that the evidence showed only that he was a passenger in a van in which the marijuana was contained. He also argues that the district court abused its discretion in denying his motion to suppress photographs taken from a camera found in a duffle bag located in the van.No. 98-50444 -2-

The evidence at trial was sufficient to establish that Saenz had control over or the power to control the marijuana in the

van. See United States v. Quiroz-Hernandez , 48 F.3d 858, 865 (5th Cir. 1995); United States v. Broussard , 80 F.3d 1025, 1030- 31 (5th Cir. 1996). Our review of the record reveals that the probative value of the photographs was not substantially outweighed by their prejudicial effect. The district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the photographs into evidence. See United States v. Pace , 10 F.3d 1106, 1115-16 (5th Cir. 1993).
AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.4

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Payless ShoeSource, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending August 3, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ullrich
E. Porzig, Senior Vice President - Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Ullrich E. Porzig
-----------------------------------------------
Ullrich E. Porzig
Senior Vice President - Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer
3XEOLF9HUVLRQRI%&,

3803%5$&.(7&$67,1*35(6685(&217$,1,1*67$,1/(6667((/



3,$==$52%(57

35,&(3803&203$1<

2WKHU

12

3XEOLF9HUVLRQRI%&,


12

12

 .*



,03257,1*7+,63$57)520&+,1$&2676
Exhibit 32.2

CFO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with Form 10-Q of POZEN Inc. (the Company) , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, William L. Hodges, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 5, 2010 |  |                        
|                     | 
|                     |  | /s/ William L. Hodges  
|                     |  | William L. Hodges      
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by
Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



47
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FILED AS
PART OF THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       8,617,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               22,108,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 3,265,000
<INVENTORY>                                 15,448,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            48,711,000
<PP&E>                                      15,038,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,682,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              55,927,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,865,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        87,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 511,975,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                55,927,000
<SALES>                                     18,758,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,758,000
<CGS>                                       18,663,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               18,663,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,377,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               641,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,142,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,800,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,342,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,342,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.38)
        

</TABLE>