alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4082 

To prohibit the use by the Department of Veterans Affairs of funds to 

provide emergency assistance at the southern border of the United States 

resulting from the repeal of certain public health orders, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 26, 2022 

Mr. BOOZMAN (for himself, Mr. TILLIS, Mr. RUBIO, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. 

INHOFE, Mr. DAINES, Mr. THUNE, Mrs. HYDE-SMITH, Mrs. FISCHER, 

Mr. COTTON, Mr. HAGERTY, and Ms. ERNST) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ 

Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit the use by the Department of Veterans Affairs 

of funds to provide emergency assistance at the southern 

border of the United States resulting from the repeal 

of certain public health orders, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4082 IS

1 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS BY DEPART2 MENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS TO PROVIDE 

3 EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE AT THE SOUTHERN 

4 BORDER OF THE UNITED STATES RESULTING 

5 FROM THE REPEAL OF CERTAIN PUBLIC 

6 HEALTH ORDERS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Veterans Affairs 

8 may not obligate or expend any amounts to provide emer9 gency assistance in response to an emergency at the south10 ern border directly resulting from the repeal of an order 

11 specified in subsection (b). 

12 (b) ORDER SPECIFIED.—An order specified in this 

13 subsection is any of the following: 

14 (1) The Order issued by the Director of the 

15 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on Au16 gust 2, 2021, entitled ‘‘Public Health Reassessment 

17 and Order Suspending the Right To Introduce Cer18 tain Persons From Countries Where a Quarantin19 able Communicable Disease Exists’’ (86 Fed. Reg. 

20 42828). 

21 (2) The Order issued by the Director of the 

22 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on April 

23 1, 2022, entitled ‘‘Public Health Determination and 

24 Order Regarding Suspending the Right To Intro25 duce Certain Persons From Countries Where a 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4082 IS

1 Quarantinable Communicable Disease Exists’’ (87 

2 Fed. Reg. 19941). 

3 (3) An order relating to the same public health 

4 concern as an order specified in paragraph (1) or 

5 (2). 

6 (c) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this sec7 tion shall be construed to prevent the Secretary from obli8 gating or expending amounts to provide emergency assist9 ance at the southern border that is not described in sub10 section (a). 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2202

Curtis Instruments, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-1859

Advantest America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
<PAGE>   1





                                   EXHIBIT 11

                       COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
<PAGE>   2
              LIVING CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                      COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                   (in thousands, except per share amount)
                                 (unaudited)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                  1996      1995      1994
                                                 -------   -------   -------
<S>                                              <C>       <C>       <C>
ASSUMING FULL DILUTION (a)


Net Income                                       $43,180   $24,234   $26,616

Pro forma taxes  (b)                                   0       599       899
                                                 -------   -------   -------
Pro forma net income                             $43,180   $23,635   $25,717
                                                 =======   =======   =======

Applicable Common Shares:

    Weighted average shares outstanding
        during the period                         20,124    18,851    16,923

    Weighted average shares issuable
        upon exercise of common stock
        options using the treasury stock
        method                                       191       193       209

    Weighted average shares issuable
        upon exercise of warrants using
        the treasury stock method                     -         -         -
                                                 -------   -------   -------


    Total shares                                  20,315    19,044    17,132
                                                 =======   =======   =======



Earnings per share (fully diluted) (c)           $  2.13   $  1.27   $  1.55
                                                 =======   =======   =======


Pro forma earnings per share (fully diluted(c)   $  2.13   $  1.24   $  1.50
                                                 =======   =======   =======
</TABLE>


(a)  This calculation is submitted in accordance with Regulation S-K,
     item 601 (b) (1 by footnote 2 to paragraph 14 of APB Opinion No. 15
     because it results in less

(b)  The pro forma provision is included to reflect the estimated taxes
     that would ha BCC Entities S corporations

(c)  Excluding non-recurring merger and acquisition and other related
     costs of $14.3 per share and pro forma earnings per share in 1995
     would have been $1.94 and $
Assignment of Loan Sale Agreement


 Exhibit 10.2 
 ASSIGNMENT OF LOAN SALE AGREEMENT 
 THIS ASSIGNMENT OF LOAN SALE AGREEMENT (this
“Assignment”) is made this 28th day of June, 2011, between TNP ACQUISITIONS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Assignor”); and TNP SRT CONSTITUTION TRAIL, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
(“Assignee”). 
 W I T N E S S E T H: 
 THAT for and in consideration of the sum of ten dollars ($10.00) cash in hand paid and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Assignor does
hereby transfer and assign to Assignee all of Assignor’s rights, title, and interest in, to, and under that certain Loan Sale Agreement, dated June 21, 2011, as amended (the “Agreement”), M&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank,
a Wisconsin state-chartered bank, as Seller, and TNP Acquisitions, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, as Buyer, in connection with the acquisition of the loan described therein (the “Loan”), which Loan is more particularly
described in the Agreement. 
 Assignee, as evidenced by its signature hereto, agrees to assume and perform the obligations of
Assignor under the Agreement. 
 [SIGNATURES FOLLOW] 

  
 1 







 WITNESS the following signatures: 

 

													
	ASSIGNOR:	 		 	 TNP ACQUISITIONS, LLC, a
 Delaware limited liability company

					
		 		 		 	By:	 	/s/ Stephen Corea
		 		 		 	Name:	 	Stephen Corea
		 		 		 	Its:	 	SVP Acquisitions
			
	ASSIGNEE:	 		 	 TNP SRT CONSTITUTION TRAIL, LLC, a
 Delaware limited liability company

					
		 		 		 	By:	 	 TNP Strategic Retail Operating Partnership, L.P., a
 Delaware limited partnership
 its Sole Member

						
		 		 		 		 	By:	 	 TNP Strategic Retail Trust, Inc., a
 Delaware corporation
 its general Partner

							
		 		 		 		 		 	By:	 	/s/ Stephen Corea
		 		 		 		 		 	Name:	 	Stephen Corea
		 		 		 		 		 	Its:	 	SVP Acquisitions


  
 2
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 46 (Thursday, March 9, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 12976]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5796]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION

Release of Waybill Data

    The Commission has received a request from Harkins Cunningham and 
Southern Pacific Lines (SP) for permission to use certain data from the 
1992 and 1993 I.C.C. Waybill Samples. A copy of the request (WB470--1/
30/95) may be obtained from the I.C.C. Office of Economic and 
Environmental Analysis.
    The waybill sample contains confidential railroad and shipper data; 
therefore, if any parties object to this request, they should file 
their objections with the Director of the Commission's Office of 
Economic and Environmental Analysis within 14 calendar days of the date 
of this notice. The rules for release of waybill data are codified at 
49 CFR 1244.8.

    Contact: James A. Nash, (202) 927-6196
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-5796 Filed 3-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7035-01-P
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2742

Faurecia US Holdings:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 3 (Thursday, January 5, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 1876]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-72]




[[Page 1875]]

_______________________________________________________________________

Part V





Department of the Interior





_______________________________________________________________________



Bureau of Indian Affairs



_______________________________________________________________________



Environmental Impact Statement; Fort Mojave Indian Reservation, NV and 
CA; Notice

Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 3 / Thursday, January 5, 1995 / 
Notices 
[[Page 1876]]

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs


Notice of Cancellation of the Mojave Highlands Environmental 
Impact Statement (EIS) for the Proposed Development of a Planned 
Community on Fort Mojave Tribal Lands, Clark County, NV, and San 
Bernardino County, CA

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Cancellation of an Environmental Impact Statement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice advises the public that the Bureau of Indian 
Affairs (BIA) intends to cancel all work on the EIS for the Mojave 
Highlands proposal.

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: The proposed project in the EIS was for 
Calmark-Fort Mojave, Inc., a Nevada Corporation, to lease certain 
tribal lands within the State of California (145 acres) and the State 
of Nevada (588 acres) from the Fort Mojave Indian Tribe for the 
development of a planned residential community. Two Conditional 
Approvals were signed by the BIA on July 7, 1990. The Fort Mojave 
Indian Tribe requested withdrawal of the Conditional Approvals and on 
April 7, 1994, the Conditional Approvals were withdrawn for failure of 
the lessee to complete the environmental process. Both pending leases 
totaled approximately 733 acres. The Notice of Intent was originally 
published in the Federal Register on February 5, 1990. Several public 
scoping meetings were held in early February 1990 and the EIS was only 
completed to a preliminary draft stage and had not been released for 
public review or comment.
DATES: Effective January 5, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Comments should be addressed to Mr. Walter Mills, Area 
Director, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Phoenix Area Office, P.O. Box 10, 
Phoenix, Arizona 85001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Amy L. Heuslein, Environmental 
Protection Officer, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Phoenix Area Office, 
Environmental Quality Services, P.O. Box 10, Phoenix, Arizona 85001, 
Telephone (602) 379-6750; or Mrs. Laura E. Austin, Agency Environmental 
Coordinator, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Colorado River Agency, Route 1, 
Box
9-C, Parker, Arizona 85344, Telephone (602) 669-7148.


    Dated: December 22, 1994.
Ada E. Deer,
Assistant Secretary, Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 95-72 Filed 1-4-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-02-P
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-3056

Curtis Instruments, Puerto Rico, Inc: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACTAPPEALS Appeals of

-- ) ) MULE Engineering, Inc. ) ) Under Contract No. W9124M-14-C-0014 ) APPEARANCE FORTHE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA Nos. 60969, 60974, 60975

Leonard W. Childs, Jr., Esq.

Childs & Associates Savannah, GA Raymond M. Saunders, Esq.

Army ChiefTrial Attorney LTC Joseph J. Jankunis, JA

Trial Attorney OPINION BYADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE HARTMAN The government admits and stipulates to entitlement in these three Board Rule 12.2 appeals.* The contracting officerhas addressed quantum in both ASBCA Nos. 60969 and 60975 by providingthe full requested reliefin a unilateral contract Modification, No. POOOOI. ASBCA Nos. 60969 and 60975 are dismissed. ASBCA No. 60974 is sustained as to entitlement and returned to the parties for negotiation of quantum. Dated: 8February 2017

TERRENCE S. HARTMAN Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContractAppeals

* A decision under Board Rule 12.2 shall have no value as precedent, and in the absence offraud, shall be final and conclusive and may notbe appealed to the Board's appellate authority.I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Opinion and Decision ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 60969, 60974, 60975, Appeals ofMULE Engineering, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

January 12, 2024

SC-2023-0722

Ex parte S.M. PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE 

COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS (In re: S.M. v. Madison County 

Department of Human Resources) (Madison Juvenile Court: JU-18-

1400.02; Civil Appeals: CL-2022-0575).

CERTIFICATE OF JUDGMENT

WHEREAS, the petition for writ of certiorari in the above 

referenced cause has been duly submitted and considered by the 

Supreme Court of Alabama and the judgment indicated below was 

entered in this cause on January 12, 2024:

Writ Denied. No Opinion. Mitchell, J. -- Shaw, Wise, Bryan, 

Sellers, Mendheim, Stewart, and Cook, JJ., concur. Parker, C.J., 

dissents.

NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Rule 41, Ala. R. App. P., IT IS 

HEREBY ORDERED that this Court's judgment in this cause is certified 

on this date. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise ordered 

by this Court or agreed upon by the parties, the costs of this cause are 

hereby taxed as provided by Rule 35, Ala. R. App. P.

I, Megan B. Rhodebeck, certify that this is the record of the judgment of the Court, witness 

my hand and seal.

Clerk, Supreme Court of Alabama
Exhibit 10.67
                                 SPS INCENTIVE PLAN



Coverage:
--------

Limited to a senior management group that can most directly affect the success
of any potential sale of the Company or any potential sale of substantially all
of the Company's assets to another unaffiliated company and maximize value to
the shareholders.


     Members:  Robert L. Wieseneck
               Richard F. Atkinson
               Robert W. Archer
               Russell J. Bonaguidi
               Sherry Bowden
               Robert J. Ferkenhoff
               Douglas Harrison
               Stephen W. Maxwell
               Larry H. Myatt
               Ruth M. O'Brien
               David J. Peterson
               Serge J. Uccetta


Objective and Approach:
----------------------

Incent the members of senior management most able to maximize the price to be
paid in any potential sale transaction.  The objective of any sale would be to
achieve the greatest possible shareholder value.  This Incentive Plan
recognizes the ability of a small group of senior management to have a major
impact on the price.  Accordingly, the Board of Directors has determined that
the members receive an amount equal to 3% of the proceeds above a base price.


Pool Size:
---------

Pool equals 3% of the gross proceeds of sale of the Company or substantially
all of its assets above a base price equal to $23.00 per share multiplied by
the total number of shares of the Company's common stock outstanding at the
time of any sale transaction.

Exclusion:  This plan does not include the sale of any assets managed, but not
owned by SPS.


Distribution of Pool:
--------------------

The amount distributed to an individual member of the pool is at the discretion
of the Compensation Committee of the Board based on the recommendations of the
Chairman after consultation with the CEO, which shall be made immediately prior
to closing of any sale transaction.

The entire pool will be distributed to the members who are employees in good
standing on the day of a sale's closing.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3251

General Bearing Corp:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel