13724 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 49 / Tuesday, March 14, 1995 / Notices

that any owner or operator complying

with provisions in a State/Tribal

program approved by EPA should be

considered to be in compliance with the

Federal Criteria. See 56 FR 50978, 50995

(October 9, 1991).

Today’s action takes effect on March

14, 1995. EPA believes it has good cause

under section 553(d) of the

Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C

553(d), to put this action into effect less

than 30 days after publication in the

Federal Register.

All of the requirements and

obligations in New York State program

are already in effect as a matter of law.

EPA’s action today does not impose any

new requirements that the regulated

community must begin to comply with.

Nor do these requirements become

enforceable by EPA as Federal law.

Consequently, EPA finds that it does not

need to give notice prior to making its

approval effective.

Compliance with Executive Order 12866

The Office of Management and Budget

has exempted this notice from the

requirements of Section 6 of Executive

Order 12866.

Certification Under the Regulatory

Flexibility Act

Pursuant to the provisions of 5 U.S.C.

605(b), I hereby certify that this

approval will not have a significant

economic impact on a substantial

number of small entities.

It does not impose any new burdens

on small entities. This notice, therefore,

does not require a regulatory flexibility

analysis.

Authority: This notice is issued under the

authority of Sections 2002, 4005 and 4010(c)

of the Solid Waste Disposal Act as amended;

42 U.S.C. 6912, 6945, 6949a(c).

Dated: February 21, 1995.

Jeanne M. Fox,

Regional Administrator.

[FR Doc. 95–6269 Filed 3–13–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

Public Information Collection

Requirement Submitted to Office of

Management and Budget for Review

March 9, 1995.

The Federal Communications

Commission has submitted the

following information collection

requirement to OMB for review and

clearance under the Paperwork

Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 3507).

Copies of this submission may be

purchased from the Commission’s copy

contractor, International Transcription

Service, Inc., 2100 M Street, N.W., Suite

140, Washington, DC 20037, (202) 857–

3800. For further information on this

submission contact Judy Boley, Federal

Communications Commission, (202)

418–0214. Persons wishing to comment

on this information collection should

contact Timothy Fain, Office of

Management and Budget, Room 10236

NEOB, Washington, DC 20503, (202)

395–3561.

Please note: The Commission has

requested emergency OMB review of this

item by March 17, 1995, under the provisions

of 5 CFR 1320.18.

OMB Number: None

Title: Survey Governing Effects of the

‘‘Must Carry’’ Requirements

Action: New collection

Respondents: Businesses or other forprofit

Frequency of Response: One time

collection

Estimated Annual Burden: 2,000

responses; .25 hours average burden

per response; 500 hours total annual

burden

Needs and Uses: In cooperation with the

U.S. Department of Justice, the

Federal Communications Commission

seeks information from cable

television operators in connection

with pending litigation involving

cable television ‘‘must carry’’

requirements (Turner Broadcasting

System v. FCC. Civil Action No. 92–

2247 and consolidated cases D.D.C.)).

The survey asks cable operators to

indicate the number of broadcast

stations carried on their systems

under ‘‘must carry’’ requirements or

‘‘retransmission consent’’ so that the

courts are fully informed of the ‘‘must

carry’’ requirements’ impact.

Federal Communications Commission.

William F. Caton,

Acting Secretary.

Survey Concerning Effects of the ‘‘MustCarry’’ Requirements

March lll, 1995.

In Turner Broadcasting Co., Inc. v.

FCC, 114 S. Ct 2445 (1994), the United

States Supreme Court considered the

constitutionality of the ‘‘Must-Carry’’

requirements, the provisions of the

Cable Television Consumer Protection

and Competition Act of 1992 which

require cable operators to carry local

television broadcast stations on their

cable systems. 47 U.S.C. §§ 534, 535.

The Court did not rule on the

constitutionality of Must-Carry, but

returned the case to the lower court for

additional inquiry into a number of

issues. These include the impact of the

Must-Carry requirements on cable

system operators. The Court described

the extent to which Must-Carry requires

cable operators to make changes in their

programming selections as one of

several questions ‘‘critical’’ to

determining whether the Must-Carry

requirements are constitutional.

Accordingly, the FCC, in cooperation

with the United States Department of

Justice, which is defending the

constitutionality of the Must-Carry

requirements in the Turner

Broadcasting case, seeks your assistance

in responding to the enclosed survey

questionnaire, so that the Department

can more fully inform the courts of

Must-Carry’s impact.

Notice to Individuals Required by the

Privacy Act of 1974 and the Paperwork

Reduction Act

The request for information in this survey

is authorized by the Communications Act of

1934, as amended. The Commission will use

the information as described above. The

Department of Justice will also use the

information. All information provided in

response to this survey will be available for

public inspection. A response is requested,

but your response to the survey is voluntary.

Public reporting burden for this

information is estimated to average 15

minutes per response, including the time for

reviewing instructions, searching existing

data, gathering and maintaining the data

needed, and completing and reviewing the

information. Send comments regarding the

burden estimate or any other aspect of this

request for information, including

suggestions for reducing the burden, to the

Federal Communications Commission,

Records Management Division, Washington,

D.C. 20554, and to the Office of Management

and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project

(3060–lll), Washington, D.C. 20503.

This notice is required by the Privacy Act

of 1974, P.L. 93–579, Dec. 31, 1975, 5 U.S.C.

§ 522a(e)(3) and the Paperwork Reduction

Act of 1980, P.L. 96–511, Dec. 11, 1980, 47

U.S.C. § 3507.

Please complete and return the

enclosed survey form by mail or fax by

April 7, 1995. Thank you for your

cooperation.

For further information, please

contact:

Adam Issenberg (202) 616–8476, Eric

Angel (202) 514–4775, United States

Dept. of Justice

Grey Pash (202) 418–1740, Federal

Communications Commission, Office

of General Counsel

Survey Concerning Effects of the ‘‘MustCarry’’ Requirements

Please complete this form and return it by

mail in the enclosed envelope or by fax to

one of the numbers listed below no later than

April 7, 1995.

Physical System Identification No.: llll

Operator:

lllllllllllllllllll
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 49 / Tuesday, March 14, 1995 / Notices 13725

lllllllllllllllllll

lllllllllllllllllll

lllllllllllllllllll

1. How many usable activated channels are there on your cable system? (‘‘Usable activated channels’’ are the channels engineered at the headend which are generally available to residential subscribers, including channels designated for public,

educational or governmental use, regardless of whether those channels are currently in use, and excluding channels that

could not, for technical or safety reasons, be used for distribution of broadcast signals.) ............................................................ 1. lll

2. How many local broadcast television stations now carried on your system are carried in fulfillment of the must-carry requirements? (This information is required by the FCC’s rules to be kept in your public inspection file.) .................................. 2. lll

3. Of these signals you carry because of the must-carry requirements, how many (a) noncommercial educational and (b) commercial broadcast television stations were added to your system after the date the must-carry rules became effective? (The

effective date of the rules was Dec. 4, 1992 for noncommercial educational television stations and June 2, 1993 for commercial television stations.).

Non-commercial educational stations added ................................................................................................................................ 3.a. lll

Commercial stations added ............................................................................................................................................................ 3.b. lll

4. How many local broadcast television stations are carried on your system pursuant to retransmission consent? ...................... 4. lll

5. Of the usable activated channels on your system (see explanation in No. 1 above), how many are not currently used to provide video signals to subscribers? ...................................................................................................................................................... 5. lll

Return to: Federal Communications

Commission, 1919 M St., N.W., Mail Stop

1400A, Washington, D.C. 20554, Attention:

Must-Carry Survey, or Fax to: (202) 418–

2819, (202) 418–2822.

[FR Doc. 95–6291 Filed 3–13–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712–01–M

Petition For Reconsideration of Action

In Rulemaking Proceeding

March 7, 1995.

A petition for reconsideration has

been filed in the Commission

rulemaking proceeding listed in this

Public Notice and published pursuant to

47 CFR 1.429(e). The full text of this

document is available for viewing and

copying in Room 239, 1919 M Street

NW., Washington, DC or may be

purchased from the Commission’s copy

contractor ITS, Inc. (202) 857–3800.

Opposition to this petition must be filed

on or before March 29, 1995.

See § 1.4(b)(1) of the Commission’s

rules (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies to an

opposition must be filed within 10 days

after the time for filing oppositions has

expired.

SUBJECT: In the Matter of Authority to

Issue Subpoenas (FCC 94–319).

FILED BY: Mark J. Golden, Vice President

of The Personal Communications

Industry Association on January 26,

1995.

Federal Communications Commission.

William F. Caton,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–6162 Filed 3–13–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712–01–M

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

John Ashley Dukes; Change in Bank

Control Notice

Acquisition of Shares of Banks or

Bank Holding Companies

The notificant listed below has

applied under the Change in Bank

Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and §

225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12

CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank

holding company. The factors that are

considered in acting on notices are set

forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12

U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notice is available for immediate

inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank

indicated. Once the notice has been

accepted for processing, it will also be

available for inspection at the offices of

the Board of Governors. Interested

persons may express their views in

writing to the Reserve Bank indicated

for the notice or to the offices of the

Board of Governors. Comments must be

received not later than March 28, 1995.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta

(Zane R. Kelley, Vice President) 104

Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia

30303:

1. John Ashley Dukes, Jesup, Georgia;

to acquire an additional .03 percent, for

a total of 10.02 percent, of the voting

shares of Wayne Bancorp. Inc., Jesup,

Georgia, and thereby indirectly acquire

Wayne National Bank, Jesup, Georgia.

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve

System, March 8, 1995.

Jennifer J. Johnson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 95–6200 Filed 3–13–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210–01–F

Farmington Bancorp; Change in Bank

Control Notices; Acquisitions of

Shares of Banks or Bank Holding

Companies; Correction

This notice corrects a notice (FR Doc.

95-4351) published on page 10082 of the

issue for Thursday, February 23, 1995.

Under the Federal Reserve Bank of of

San Francisco heading, the entry for

Farmington Bancorp, is revised to read

as follows:

1. Farmington Bancorp, Seattle,

Washington, and Farmington Finance

Corporation, Hong Kong; to become

bank holding companies by acquiring

100 percent of the voting shares of

Farmington State Bank, Farmington,

Washington.

Comments on this application must

be received by March 17, 1995.

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve

System, March 8, 1995.

Jennifer J. Johnson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 95–6201 Filed 3–13–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210–01–F

GreatBanc, Inc., et al.; Formations of;

Acquisitions by; and Mergers of Bank

Holding Companies

The companies listed in this notice

have applied for the Board’s approval

under section 3 of the Bank Holding

Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1842) and §

225.14 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12

CFR 225.14) to become a bank holding

company or to acquire a bank or bank

holding company. The factors that are

considered in acting on the applications

are set forth in section 3(c) of the Act

(12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).

Each application is available for

immediate inspection at the Federal

Reserve Bank indicated. Once the

application has been accepted for

processing, it will also be available for

inspection at the offices of the Board of