alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                              FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001060224
<NAME>                        Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollar

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         1,074
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,707
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               7,322
<PP&E>                                         551,807
<DEPRECIATION>                                 30,261
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 528,868
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          211,630
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    30,000
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     268,098
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   528,868
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               62,627
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  17,581
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               13,536
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             10,476
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                21,034
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            21,034
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   20,533
<EPS-BASIC>                                  1.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.54




</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3959 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3959

  To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide the Secretary of 
 Health and Human Services with the authority to suspend the right to 
  introduce certain persons or property into the United States in the 
                     interest of the public health.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 30, 2022

   Mr. Hagerty (for himself, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Risch, Mr. Lee, and Mrs. 
  Blackburn) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide the Secretary of 
 Health and Human Services with the authority to suspend the right to 
  introduce certain persons or property into the United States in the 
                     interest of the public health.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop Fentanyl Border Crossings 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PROTECTION OF PUBLIC HEALTH.

    Section 362 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 265) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``Whenever the'' and inserting the 
        following:
    ``(a) In General.--Whenever the''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) Suspensions Relating to Illicit Drugs.--Whenever the 
Secretary determines that by reason of the existence of substantial 
illicit drug smuggling from a foreign country there is serious danger 
of the introduction of such drugs into the United States, and that this 
danger is so increased by the introduction of persons or property from 
such country that a suspension of the right to introduce such persons 
and property is required in the interest of the public health, the 
Secretary, in accordance with regulations promulgated by the Secretary, 
shall have the power to prohibit, in whole or in part, the introduction 
of persons and property from such countries or places as he shall 
designate in order to avert such danger, and for such period of time as 
he may deem necessary for such purpose.''.
                                 <all>
```
Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

Long-range 

actuarial 

balance

Annual 

balance in 

75th year

-3.61 -4.35 0.61 0.77 17% 18%

Estimates based on the intermediate assumptions of the 2023 Trustees Report Office of the Chief Actuary

Social Security Administration

September 15, 2023

Category of Change: Coverage of Employment or Earnings, or Inclusion of Other Sources of Revenue

Summary Measures and Graphs

Current law

[percent of payroll]

Change from current law

[percent of payroll] Shortfall eliminated

Proposed Provision: F7. For the estate tax, gift tax, and generation skipping transfer (GST) tax, return the 

respective exemption thresholds and tax rates to 2009 levels ($3.5 million threshold for estate tax with a 

top 45% tax rate) for deaths after 2023 and gifts made after 2023, with those levels not indexed in future 

years. All proceeds from the estate tax, gift tax, and GST tax would go to the OASI and DI Trust Funds.

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Cost Rates and Income Rates

(as a percentage of taxable payroll)

Income rates under current law

Income rates with this provision

Cost rates under current law

Cost rates with this provision

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2023 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

Percent

Year

OASDI Trust Fund Ratio

(assets as a percentage of annual expenditures)

Current law With this provision
Exhibit 32.1



Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Adams Golf, Inc, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify that:
The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the "Periodic Report") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  | ADAMS GOLF, INC.                     
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|                        |  |                                      
|Date:  November 8, 2005 |  | By:/S/ OLIVER G. BREWER III          
|                        |  | Oliver G. Brewer, III                
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer and President
|                        |  |                                      
|Date:  November 8, 2005 |  | By:/S/ ERIC LOGAN                    
|                        |  | Eric Logan                           
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer              
|                        |  | (Principal Financial Officer)        





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Act and is not being filed as part of the Periodic Report or as a separate disclosure document
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Adams Golf, Inc. and will be retained by Adams Golf, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Presidential Documents

13887

Federal Register

Vol. 60, No. 49

Tuesday, March 14, 1995

Title 3—

The President

Proclamation 6775 of March 10, 1995

National Park Week, 1995

By the President of the United States of America

A Proclamation

Each National Park is a classroom without walls, a living laboratory for

learning about natural environments, important historical events, and valuable cultural resources that make up our national heritage. To preserve

this heritage, the National Park Service works with students and teachers

to create exciting learning environments in which to activate a child’s interest.

Within each park lies a compelling story—a powerful reminder of our Nation’s origins and destiny. Geology, political science, marine ecology, the

Civil War, language, art, music, maritime history, geography, wildlife, the

American Revolution, technology—all come to life in our National Park

System. Today, the men and women of the National Park Service are reaching

out to the next generation of caretakers, instilling in our children a respect

for the land, an understanding of our common American heritage, and

an appreciation of parks as places of inspiration.

Through innovative educational programs, the National Park Service is actively building a new constituency of park supporters who will carry with

them the most valued lessons of our country. ‘‘Junior Ranger’’ programs

throughout the United States help children understand the wonders of the

national parks and the importance of preserving them for years to come.

‘‘Parks As Classrooms’’ links parks with local schools and communities,

reaching out to new audiences with hands-on activities. Residential camping

programs open up new worlds of exploration and self-discovery for today’s

young people, in both inner cities and rural areas. Seminars for teachers

assist in encouraging and improving the connections of young people to

park areas.

National Park Week, 1995, is a time to celebrate the rich educational tradition

of our parks. I encourage all Americans to join me in observing National

Park Week as the beginning of a lifetime of learning, appreciating, and

acting on behalf of our national treasures. I call on all Americans to learn

more about our National Park System and to observe this week with appropriate ceremonies and programs.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, WILLIAM J. CLINTON, President of the United States

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim the week of May 22

through May 28, 1995, as ‘‘National Park Week.’’
13888 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 49 / Tuesday, March 14, 1995 / Presidential Documents

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this tenth day of

March, in the year of our Lord nineteen hundred and ninety-five, and

of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred

[FR Doc. 95–6477

Filed 3-13-95; 10:12 am]

Billing code 3195–01–P

and nineteenth.

œ–
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3557

Quality Vision International, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

“Made in China 2025” or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET, STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS INCLUDED IN THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDING DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND DECEMBER 31,
1997.
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          40,532
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,123
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                44,664
<PP&E>                                           8,146
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,886
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  49,023
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,911
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            37
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,700
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    49,023
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                53,927
<CGS>                                              125
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      125
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,540
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 30,170
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,068
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,102
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,102
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .47
        

</TABLE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 13, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3797

Knowles Corporation:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests and the 

request failed to show that this particular product is available only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
### NU MBE R 13- 08- 0031 9-C V 

## COURT OF A PP EA LS T H I R T E E N T H D I S T R I C T O F T E X AS CORPUS CHRI ST I -E DI NBURG

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ IN T H E IN T ER ES TO F Y . E

.

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ On A ppea l from the C ounty C our t at L aw N o. 4 of H i da l go C ou nty , T ex as .

____ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ _ 

## ME MOR A N D U M OP I N I ON B ef or e Just i ces Ro dr i guez, G ar za, and V el a M em or andu m O pi ni on P erC ur i am App ellant , W alter Eliz ond o, at tem pte d to perfect an app eal from a “Master court’s jud g ment ent ered on Dec ember 17, 2007.” U pon revie w o f the doc uments before the Cou rt , i t app ears t hat t here i s no such orde r entered by the Cou nty

C our t atLaw N o. 4 of Hidalgo, Coun ty, T exas, in cause no. F-206 7-01 -4. It app ears tha t the order f rom which thi s a ppeal w as tak en i s n ot an appeal abl e order

. On M ay 27, 2008, t h e C lerk

of thi s C our

t not ified appel lan t of thi s d efect s o tha t ste ps coul d be tak en to correctthe defect, if it coul d be done. SeeT EX . R. A PP . P. 3 7.1,2

42.3. Appel lan t w as adv is ed th at, if the defect was not c or re cte d w it hin ten day s from the date of rec eip t of thi s n oti ce, the appeal w o u ld be di smi ss ed for w ant o f jur is dicti on. Appel lan t fail ed to respon d to the C our t’ s n oti ce. T he Cou rt, having consid ered t he d oc um ent s on f ile and app ellant 's fa ilure to correct the d efect i n thi s matter , is of the opi nio n tha t t he appe al shoul d be dis mis sed for w ant o f jur is dicti on. See i

d. Acc ordin g ly , the appeal is DI SM ISSE D FO R W ANT OF JU RI SD IC TION

. See i d. 42.3 (b),(c).

PERC UR IAM Me moran dum Opi nio n del iv ered and fil ed th is the 21stday of Aug ust , 200 8.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3902

Helen of Troy:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
#### COMMERCIAL NATIONAL BANK OF CHARLOTTE, N. C., and THOMAS D. OSBORNE, Executors of the Estate of MARY D. OSBORNE, v. J. H. CARSON and C. M. CARSON.

(Filed 12 December, 1934.)

Mortgages F a—

Tbe liability of tbe maker of a mortgage note to tbe payee thereof is not changed from, tbat of principal to tbat of guarantor by the fact tbat tbe maker transfers bis equity in tbe property to a third person who assumes tbe debt and tbe payee accepts from such third person- partial payments on tbe note and extends tbe time of payment without tbe maker’s knowledge.

Appeal by defendants from *Rill, Special Judge,*at June Term, 1934, of MecKlenbueg.

Affirmed.

Tbe plaintiffs brought this action to collect a past-due bond. From tbe allegations contained in tbe complaint and answer it appears tbat tbe plaintiffs are tbe executors of tbe payee of said bond, and tbat tbe defendants are tbe makers thereof; tbat said bond was secured by a deed of trust, and tbat tbe defendant subsquently sold tbe land covered by said deed of trust to a third party, who assumed tbe payment of tbe bond; and tbat tbe plaintiffs, without tbe knowledge of the defendants, dealt with said third party by receiving partial payments on said bond and agreeing to certain extension of payments thereon. ,The defendants bad said third party and tbe trustee' in said deed of trust made parties to this action.

*R. L. Taylor and J obn R. Small, J r., for appellants.*

*J obn M. Roiinson and Runter M. J ones for appellees.*

*496Peb Oubiam.

Tbis is an appeal from a judgment awarded the plaintiffs upon the pleadings, and presents but one question, namely: Where the payee of a bond has dealt with a person, who, for valuable consideration, assumed the payment of the debt by accepting* from him partial payments on the bond and extending the time of the payment thereof without knowledge of the makers, is the character of the makers, as between the payee and the makers, changed from that of principals to that of guarantors? This question is answered in"the negative upon the authority of *Brown v. Turner,*202 N. C., 227.

The present judgment does not preclude the defendants from proceeding in this action against him who is alleged to have assumed the payment of the bond, or to foreclose the deed of trust given to secure it, or to obtain any other relief to which they may be entitled against those whom they have had made parties thereto.

Affirmed.