alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PUBLIC VERSION
$[*********] [******]

$[*********]

INPUT

20.0

$[*********]

[******]

[******]

0.05

PUBLIC VERSION
Consistent with USTR's Section 301 notice, OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. requests

confidential treatment for the information designated as business confidential in this submission. Such

information consists of information that would not customarily be released to the public, including

business or trade secrets regarding production costs and processes, data on sales, product characteristics

customers, destinations, and other product, sales, and cost-related business secrets. Business confidential

information has been indicated herein by enclosing it in single brackets (“[ ]”). A public version of these

comments is also being filed with all confidential information removed.

OMRON in the US is the only designer of this product and only supplier of this component.

SWITCH ASSY is a molded plastic switch, and is used only for automotive purposes as a window

switch. It is only used for further assembly of components which go into domestic automobile

production. which is specified by auto manufacturer.

This product is not a target of the US Administration's 301 investigation regarding Intellectual Property

concerns. This is not a concern to IP transfer and impressment. This product contains no IP of interest

related to autonomous vehicle production.

The tariff action ultimately poses a risk of significant damage to OMRON, the domestic automobile

industry, and ultimately the US consumer as a increase in price. Like in the case of similar approvals for

vehicle components at the HTS level, OMRON views this product in the same manner. Immediate

movement of production to a US manufacturer or another country would pose significant re-tooling

costs, significant amounts of time, and approvals pertaining to consumer automobile safety standards are

costly and would take a significant amount of time to obtain.

OMRON Management Center of America, Inc. believes that CBP can easily exclude the SWITCH ASSY

in question based solely on the product description. The following are draft CBP exclusion instructions:

SWITCH ASSY ; "T"-shaped assembly with a "U"-shaped switch oriented with the length of the T

shape. Metal, Plastic, Rubber, Switch Assy used for Power Window Switch (Rear Right);Consist of

Case assy, Cover, PCB ASSY and 2 strikers.Inside Case Assy: Knob, light guide, plunger and spring.

Dimensions 84.8mm X 53 mm x 57.6mm."

This information will be contained on the invoice from the supplier

PUBLIC VERSION
PROMISSORY NOTE


Phoenix, AZ                                                              $64,800
May 30, 2000


IN EXCHANGE  FOR GOOD AND  VALUABLE  CONSIDERATION,  the receipt and adequacy of
which is hereby acknowledged,  FutureOne,  Inc., a Nevada corporation ("Maker"),
hereby  promises to pay to Kenneth P. Eck  ("Payee")  or his  assigns  under the
terms herein, at Phoenix, Arizona, in lawful money of the United States, the sum
of $64,800  together  with  interest on the unpaid  balance at the rate of Eight
Percent (8%) per annum, from the date hereof until paid ("Loaned Funds").

The Maker  hereby  grants to the Payee,  and the Payee  hereby  accepts from the
Maker, a security interest in the following  property and any and all additions,
accessions and  substitutions  thereto to secure the payment and  performance by
the Maker under this Promissory Note (the "Collateral").

THAT PORTION OF MAKER'S  ACCOUNTS FROM ITS  DIVISION,  ROCKET  SCIENCE  CREATIVE
(INCLUDING  ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE AND CONTRACT RIGHTS) EQUALING THE SUM OF $64,800
PLUS  INTEREST  ON THE UNPAID  BALANCE AT THE RATE OF 8% PER ANNUM,  WHETHER NOW
OWNED OR HEREAFTER ACQUIRED, WHETHER NOW EXISTING OR HEREAFTER ARISING, TOGETHER
WITH THE RECORDS AND DATA RELATING TO SUCH ACCOUNTS.

Installments  of interest  and  principal  on the Loaned  Funds in the amount of
$5,000 shall be due and payable on the 1st day of each month  commencing July 1,
2000, and continuing  thereafter on the 1st day of each month  thereafter  until
the entire unpaid principal sum and accrued  interest is paid (the  "Installment
Payments").

The Maker may prepay  this  Promissory  Note,  in whole or in part,  at any time
without penalty. Any payments that are received on this Promissory Note shall be
first  applied  toward  accrued  interest,  and second  toward the  reduction of
principal.

Should default occur in any Installment  Payment hereunder,  and if said default
remains uncured for a period of 15 consecutive  days after written demand by the
Payee thereof,  then the whole sum of unpaid  principal and accrued interest due
thereunder may become immediately due and payable, at the option of the Payee.

If suit is  brought to recover  amounts  due under the terms of this  Promissory
Note,  the Maker hereby  promises to pay  reasonable  attorney's  fees and court
costs.
<PAGE>
The Maker and any endorsers of this  Promissory  Note waive  diligence,  demand,
presentment  for payment,  notice of dishonor  and  protest,  and consent to the
extension of time for payment of this Promissory Notice without notice.

This  Promissory  Note is made in  Arizona,  and  the  execution,  delivery  and
performance  hereof shall be governed by and  construed in  accordance  with the
laws of the State of Arizona.

FUTUREONE, INC.
a Nevada corporation


By:
   ----------------------------------
Title:
      -------------------------------
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
ANGELIA DENISE SMITH , ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 21

- 0 700 (UNA) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , ) ) Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION
This matter is before the Court on its initial review of the P laintiff’s pro se complaint and application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis

. Under the statute governing in forma pauperis proceedings, the Court is required to dismiss a case “at any time” it determines that the action is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) . Here, h aving reviewed the complaint carefully, the Court concludes that it cannot discern what claim or claims P laintiff intends to bring . Because Plaintiff’s complaint
lacks coherence and fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, the Court is required to dismiss it under 28 U.S.C. § 19 15(e)(2) ; see also Gwinnell

- Kennedy v. U.S. Gov ’t Judiciary , No. 0 9

- cv - 737, 2009 WL 1089543, at *1 (D.D.C. Apr. 22, 2009) (summarily dismissing complaint under § 1915(e)(2) because it was “incoherent”); McGuire v. U.S. Dist. Court , No. 10

-

cv - 696, 2010 WL 1855858, at *1 (D.D.C. May 4, 2010) (summarily dismissing complaint under § 1915(e)(2) because it was “ largely incoherent and nonsensica l”); cf. Neitzke v. Williams , 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989) (“[A] complaint, containing

. . . . factual allegations and legal conclusions

.

. . lack [ing] an arguable basis either in law or in fact” shall be dismissed )

.2

Accordingly, t he Court will grant P laintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis and will dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim

. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately.
/s/ AMIT P. MEHTA United States District Judge DATE: March 22, 2021
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2747

Faurecia US Holdings:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

April 12, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4215

Apex Sourcing & Manufacturing: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_04.15.19.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
ex10_2.htm








Exhibit 10.2





















QR Energy Announces Appointment of Richard K. Hebert to Board of Directors


 



HOUSTON, TX--(Marketwire – July 5, 2011) - QR Energy, LP (NYSE: QRE) announced today that the Board of Directors of its general partner has elected Richard K. Hebert as an independent director.


 




Mr. Hebert is the Managing Member of two privately held oil and gas companies, Consolidated Oil & Gas, LLC and Consolidated Property Interests, LLC, both of which he co-founded in 2009.


 


Mr. Hebert served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Devonshire Energy, an oil and gas company wholly-owned by Fidelity Investments, from 2007 until 2008. From 1997 until 2002, Mr. Hebert served as President and Director of Howell Corporation, where he was also Chief Operating Officer from 1997 until 2000 and Chief Executive Officer from 2000 until 2002.


 


In 1993, Mr. Hebert co-founded Voyager Energy Corporation and served as its Chief Executive Officer until it was acquired by Howell in 1997.  His experience also includes operational and technical roles at Burlington Resources, Meridian Oil Inc., Mobil Oil, Inc. and Superior Oil, Inc. He began his career as a production and reservoir engineer at Amoco Production Company in 1974. Mr. Hebert holds a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Tulane University.


 



Chief Executive Officer Alan Smith commented, “We are very pleased to have Ricky as our third independent director. He has more than 35 years of experience in operational, technical and managerial roles in the domestic oil and gas industry and will make a significant contribution to QR Energy’s Board of Directors and the Audit and Conflicts Committees on which he will serve.”










  





  











  








ABOUT QR ENERGY, LP


 


QR Energy, LP is a publicly traded partnership engaged in the acquisition, production and development of onshore crude oil and natural gas properties in the United States. QR Energy is headquartered in Houston, Texas.  For more information, visit QR Energy’s website at www.qrenergylp.com.


 



 


FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS


 


This press release may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. These forward-looking statements involve certain risks and uncertainties which may cause QR Energy’s results to differ materially from those implied or expressed by the forward-looking statements. For a more complete list of these risk factors, please read QR Energy’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which are available on QR Energy’s website at www.qrenergylp.com or from the Securities and Exchange Commission website at www.sec.gov.




 



 


INVESTOR CONTACTS:


 


Taylor B. Miele


Investor Relations Specialist


(713) 452-2990


 


 


Cedric W. Burgher


Chief Financial Officer


(713) 452-2200
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

February 27, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131283(26) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

CHURCH MUTUAL IN Robert P. Young, Jr. SURANCE COMPANY, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellant, Justices 

v SC: 131283 

 COA: 267524 

Ottawa CC: 99-035674-NZ 

CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s September 

26, 2006 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order 

was entered erroneously. 

p0220 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

February 27, 2007 

 Clerk
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4034

Enerpac:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 492 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs to establish a patient outreach system relating to mental health 

care, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 24, 2023 

Mr. WITTMAN (for himself and Mr. CASE) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to establish a patient outreach 

system relating to mental health care, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Be Ready to Assist 

5 Veterans in Extremis Act’’ or the ‘‘BRAVE Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 492 IH

1 SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 

2 AFFAIRS SYSTEM FOR PATIENT OUTREACH 

3 RELATING TO MENTAL HEALTH CARE. 

4 (a) ESTABLISHMENT OF SYSTEM.—Chapter 17 of 

5 title 38, United States Code, is amended by inserting after 

6 section 1720J the following new section (and conforming 

7 the table of sections at the beginning of such chapter ac8 cordingly): 

9 ‘‘§ 1720K. Mental health care: patient outreach sys10 tem 

11 ‘‘The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall establish a 

12 patient outreach system under which the Secretary shall 

13 ensure that veterans who are enrolled in the system of an14 nual patient enrollment established and operated under 

15 section 1705 of this title and have experienced a traumatic 

16 or other highly stressful event, may elect to receive from 

17 the Secretary information relating to mental health and 

18 resources relating to the mental health care services avail19 able to the veteran.’’. 

20 (b) ADMINISTRATION OF SYSTEM.—In administering 

21 the patient outreach system established under section 

22 1720K of title 38, United States Code (as added by sub23 section (a)), the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall seek 

24 to coordinate such system with the Transition Assistance 

25 Program of the Department of Defense. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 492 IH

1 (c) DEADLINE FOR ESTABLISHMENT.—The Sec2 retary shall establish the patient outreach system under 

3 such section 1720K by not later than two years after the 

4 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3976

Enerpac:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

         The subsidiaries of the Registrant and the Registrant's ownership
percentage is listed below:

         Dearborn Bancorp, Inc. (the Registrant), Dearborn MI
                  owns 100% of Dearborn Bancorp Trust I, Dearborn MI
                  and
                  owns 100% of
                  Community Bank of Dearborn, Dearborn MI
                           owns 100% of
                           Community Bank Mortgage, Inc., Dearborn MI
                           and
                           Community Bank Audit Services, Inc., Dearborn MI
                           and
                           Community Bank Insurance Agency, Inc., Dearborn MI
                                     owns 8.74% of
                                     Michigan Bankers Title of East Michigan,
                                     LLC, Lansing MI
Exhibit 4.20





Exhibit 4.20




Supplemental Agreement to Exclusive Option Agreement




This Supplemental Agreement to Exclusive Option Agreement (this “Agreement”) is executed by
and among the following Parties as of the 23th day of June, 2008:



	 	 	 
	Party A:

	 	Ku6 (Beijing) Technology Co., Ltd., a Wholly Foreign Owned
Enterprise, organized and existing under the laws of the PRC,
with its address at Room 1206, Fuhuaqi Tower 2B, Zhongguancun
Software Garden, Dong Bei Wang, Haidian District, Beijing;

	 
	 	 
	Party B:

	 	Hailong Han, a Chinese citizen with Chinese Identification No.: 34122319860618351X; and

	 
	 	 
	Party C:

	 	Ku6 (Beijing) Information Technology Co., Ltd., a limited
liability company organized and existing under the laws of the
PRC, with its address at No. 750 of Dongran Village, Si Ji Qing,
Haidian District, Beijing 100089, P. R. China.







In this Agreement, each of Party A, Party B and Party C shall be referred to as a “Party”
respectively, and they shall be collectively referred to as the “Parties”.



Whereas:




	 	1.	 	Party A and Party B have entered into the Loan Agreement on April 11, 2007 (the
“Loan Agreement”);

	 
	 	2.	 	Party C has increased its registered capital from RMB1,000,000 to RMB10,000,000.

	 
	 	3.	 	Party B contributed RMB 200,000 to the registered capital of Party C and holds 2%
of the equity interests in Party C. ”






 


 









 






	 	1.	 	Modification:







	 	“1.1 	 	Option Granted”

	 
	 	 	 	In consideration of the payment of RMB 10 by Party A, the receipt and
adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged by Party B, Party B hereby irrevocably
grants Party A an irrevocable and exclusive right to purchase, or designate one or
more persons (each, a “Designee”) to purchase the equity interests in Party C currently held and to be held by Party B once or at multiple times
at any time in part or in whole at Party A’s sole and absolute discretion to the extent
permitted by Chinese laws and at the price described in Section 1.3 herein (such right
being the “Equity Interest Purchase Option”). Except for Party A and the Designee(s), no
other person shall be entitled to the Equity Interest Purchase Option or other rights
with respect to the equity interests of Party B. Party C hereby agrees to the grant by
Party B of the Equity Interest Purchase Option to Party A. The term “person” as used
herein shall refer to individuals, corporations, partnerships, partners, enterprises,
trusts or non-corporate organizations.”







 


2









 





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused their authorized representatives to execute this
Supplemental Agreement of Exclusive Option Agreement as of the date first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 
	Party A:  Ku6 (Beijing) Technology Co., Ltd.

	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 

Name:  Shanyou Li
	 	 
	 
	 	Title:  Legal Representative	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Party B:  Hailong Han

	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 

	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Party C:  Ku6 (Beijing) Information Technology Co., Ltd.

	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 

Name:  Hailong Han
	 	 
	 
	 	Title:  Legal Representative	 	 







 


3