alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification







Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of Aoxing Pharmaceutical Company, Inc. (the “Company”) certify that:




1.           The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period  ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and




2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









November 15, 2010
/s/ Zhenjiang YueZhenjiang Yue, Chief Executive OfficerNovember 15, 2009
/s/ Guoan ZhangGuoan Zhang, Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 53 (Monday, March 20, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14779-14780]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6736]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993; Financial Services Technology Consortium, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on November 22, 1994, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Financial Services 
Technology Consortium, Inc. (the ``Consortium'') has filed written 
notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal 
Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, the new Principal 
Member of the Consortium is: Banc One Services Corporation, Columbus, 
OH. The following parties were admitted as Associate Members of the 
Consortium: Motorola, Schaumburg, IL; American Express TRS Co., Inc., 
Salt Lake City, UT; Visa International, San Francisco, CA; Proprietary 
and Financial Products, Inc., Charleston, SC; Bank of Montreal, 
Toronto, Ontario, CANADA; OKI Advanced Products Division, Marlborough, 
MA; and IBM Corporation, New York, NY.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the Consortium. Membership remains open, and the Consortium 
intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes 
in membership.
    On October 21, 1993, the Consortium filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on December 14, 1993 (58 Fed. Reg. 65399).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on August 15, 
1994. A [[Page 14780]] notice was published in the Federal Register 
pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on January 12, 1994 (60 F.R. 2986).
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 95-6736 Filed 3-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4880 

To waive sovereign immunity in certain circumstances where jurisdictions 

prohibit monetary bail. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 25, 2023 

Ms. MALLIOTAKIS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To waive sovereign immunity in certain circumstances where 

jurisdictions prohibit monetary bail. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting All Commu5 nities Equally Act of 2023’’ or as the ‘‘PACE Act of 

6 2023’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4880 IH

1 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT OF AVAILABILITY OF CASH BAIL 

2 FOR CERTAIN OFFENDERS. 

3 If monetary bail has been prohibited in a State or 

4 any political subdivision thereof, the courts of that State 

5 shall have the authority— 

6 (1) to determine the dangerousness of individ7 uals before the courts on criminal charges; and 

8 (2) to hold on bail individuals who are deter9 mined to be violent and/or repeat offenders. 

10 SEC. 3. WAIVER OF SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY. 

11 A State or political subdivision thereof that has a pro12 hibition on monetary bail waives sovereign immunity with 

13 respect to a cause of action against the local government 

14 by an individual for property damages or damages for per15 sonal injuries as a result of a dangerous criminal being 

16 released without monetary bail. 

17 SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

18 This Act shall take effect beginning on the date that 

19 is 30 days after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          41,139
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,016
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     20,311
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                87,037
<PP&E>                                       8,116,555
<DEPRECIATION>                                 197,325
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,208,393
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          293,436
<BONDS>                                      1,794,186
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,230
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,108,541
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,208,393
<SALES>                                        969,661
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               969,661
<CGS>                                          719,042
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,269,557
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,301
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              47,900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (367,097)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (367,097)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (367,097)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)


</TABLE>
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Keith JOHNSON-BEY, Defendant/Appellant. Keith JOHNSON-BEY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

Nos. 61937, 63870.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

March 8, 1994.

*144Robert E. Steele, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for defendanVappellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Mary Moulton Bryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff/respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction, by a jury, of delivery of a controlled substance. § 195.211, RSMo Supp.1993. He was sentenced as a persistent offender to fourteen years imprisonment. He also appeals the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.-16(b).
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Killbuck Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Luther E. Proper, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        
|------------------------
|By: /s/ Luther E. Proper
|                        
|Luther E. Proper        
|Chief Executive Officer 
|May 12, 2010            

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Killbuck Bancshares, Inc. and will be retained by Killbuck Bancshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23





                         Independent Auditor's Consent


The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Diametrics Medical, Inc.


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Nos.
333-63689, 333-63687, 333-51951, 333-33257, 333-24169, 333-24167, 333-24079 and
33-83572) on Forms S-3 and S-8 of Diametrics Medical, Inc., of our report dated
January 27, 2000, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Diametrics
Medical, Inc. and Subsidiary as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1999, which report
is incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Diametrics
Medical, Inc.



                                                             /s/ KPMG LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 30, 2000
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               Sep-30-1999
<CASH>                                         230,369
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               23,164,938
<ALLOWANCES>                                   692,973
<INVENTORY>                                  5,395,040
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            30,633,117
<PP&E>                                     132,407,773
<DEPRECIATION>                              46,593,091
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             149,855,823
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       27,912,229
<BONDS>                                    105,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           244
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,042,450
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               149,855,823
<SALES>                                    105,431,215
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           105,431,215
<CGS>                                       80,594,873
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               97,222,189
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (8,104)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          11,843,928
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (3,626,798)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (362,680)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (3,264,118)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (3,264,118)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 57 (Friday, March 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15623]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7283]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES INFORMATION AGENCY


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition; 
Determination

    Notice is hereby given of the following determination: Pursuant to 
the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 
985, 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978 (43 FR 
13359, March 29, 1978), and Delegation Order No. 85-5 of June 27, 1985 
(50 FR 27393, July 2, 1985), I hereby determine that the objects in the 
exhibit, ``Assyrian Origins: Discoveries at Ashur on the Tigris; 
Antiquities in the Vorderasiatisches Museum, Berlin,'' (see list)\1\ 
imported from abroad for the temporary exhibition without profit within 
the United States, are of cultural significance. These objects are 
imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign lender. I also 
determine that the temporary exhibition of the objects at the 
Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, New York from on or about May 2 
to on or about August 13, 1995, is in the national interest.

    \1\A copy of this list may be obtained by contacting Ms. Neila 
Sheahan of the Office of the General Counsel of USIA. The telephone 
number is 202/619-5030, and the address is Room 700, U.S. 
Information Agency, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Public notice of this determination is ordered to be published in 
the Federal Register.

    Dated: March 17, 1995.
Les Jin,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 95-7283 Filed 3-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8230-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       2,786,162
<SECURITIES>                                11,339,009
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,990,673
<ALLOWANCES>                                   200,000
<INVENTORY>                                  4,116,348
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            25,317,528
<PP&E>                                      19,455,298
<DEPRECIATION>                              13,680,801
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              31,972,196
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,308,060
<BONDS>                                      7,813,796
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       257,785
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,582,871
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                31,972,196
<SALES>                                     18,687,184
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,687,184
<CGS>                                       15,779,694
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,631,671
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (430,711)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               319,618
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             630,459
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (10,243,547)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (10,243,547)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (10,243,547)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.41)



</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Health Tea Corp., Appellant, v New York City Loft Board et al., Respondents.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Fingerhood, J.), entered on or about December 14, 1988, which denied petitioner’s CPLR article 78 petition for a judgment annulling a determination of the respondent Loft Board dated April 28, 1988, is unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Uncontradicted evidence shows that the petitioner landlord denied its fifth-floor tenants access to the building’s elevator after they had enjoyed such access for nearly 10 years. The respondent Loft Board’s determination to order restoration of elevator access to the tenant has a rational basis and is supported by substantial evidence *(see, Matter of Dalo v New York City Loft Bd., 157*AD2d 461).

The landlord’s issue preclusion argument is without merit. The argument is based on a 1986 order and decision of the Civil Court, New York County (Roger Bryant Hunting, J.). The doctrine of issue preclusion applies only to arguments that could have been raised in prior litigation between the same parties *(Matter of Hodes v Axelrod,*70 NY2d 364). The Loft Board could not have raised the relevant issues before *153Judge Hunting, since the arguments are based on facts that arose after those proceedings were concluded.

The landlord’s constitutional argument was not raised before the administrative body, and is therefore not preserved for review by an article 78 court *(Matter of Assay Partners v City of New York,*149 AD2d 63, 68, *Iv denied*75 NY2d 705), and should in any event be rejected as being without merit. Concur—Ross, J. P., Asch, Kassal, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.
#### Deon LOVE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 41973.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Dec. 5, 1989.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Jan. 30, 1990.

David S. Durbin, Appellate Defender, Terri L. Backhus, Asst. Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Ronald L. Jurgeson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before LOWENSTEIN, P.J., and KENNEDY and GAITAN, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from denial of Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief after an evidentia-ry hearing.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
<PAGE>   1
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
33-54398, 33-78348, 333-07515, 333-43547, 333-56697 and 333-32118 on Form S-8
and Nos. 333-60925 and 333-96369 on Form S-3 of Metretek Technologies, Inc.
(f.k.a. Marcum Natural Gas Services, Inc.) of our report dated March 17, 2000
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Metretek Technologies, Inc.
for the year ended December 31, 1999.





DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Denver, Colorado
March 28, 2000
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Earl L. BELTON, Appellant. Earl L. BELTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. WD 46488, WD 47573.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Sept. 28, 1993.

Ellen H. Flottman, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Elizabeth L. Ziegler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before SPINDEN, P.J., and FENNER and HANNA, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

A jury convicted Earl L. Belton of one count of robbery in the second degree, § 569.030, RSMo 1986, and one count of kidnapping, § 565.110, RSMo 1986. Belton appeals the kidnapping conviction and the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm the judgment of conviction *226and the denial of the post-conviction relief. Rule 30.25(b) and Rule 84.16(b).
SCWC-13-0002894

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

________________________________________________________________

STATE OF HAWAII, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

JAYSON AULD, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

________________________________________________________________

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-13-0002894; CR. NO. 12-1-0690(3))

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Jayson Auld’s 

application for writ of certiorari filed on April 9, 2015, is 

hereby accepted and will be scheduled for oral argument. The 

parties will be notified by the appellate clerk regarding 

scheduling.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, May 20, 2015.

Benjamin E. Lowenthal /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

for petitioner 

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

Artemio C. Baxa

for respondent /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-13-0002894

20-MAY-2015

02:53 PM
Exhibit 32.3
 
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.
 /s/ Gerard H. SweeneyGerard H. SweeneyPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate: November 7, 2008
 
 *
    
    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Brandywine Realty Trust and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.