alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Tracy Kathleen Chambers, * From the County Court at Law

of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 1-1169-17.

Vs. No. 11-18-00227-CR * August 20, 2020

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Wright, S.C.J. 

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J., 

sitting by assignment)

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
EXHIBIT 10.9


 


DEMAND PROMISSORY NOTE


 



	
$U.S. 200,000.00

	
Date: July 23, 2010                         







 


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned promises to pay to the order of Yuan-Hao Chang, the sum of Two Hundred Thousand dollars ($200,000.00), together with interest of 8% per annum compounded daily on the unpaid balance. The entire principal and any accrued interest shall be fully and immediately payable UPON DEMAND of any holder hereof.


 


 


Upon default in making payment within 5 days of demand, and providing this note is turned over for collection, the undersigned agrees to pay all reasonable legal fees and costs of collection to the extent permitted by law. This note shall take effect as a sealed instrument and be enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of New York. All parties to this note waive presentment, notice of non-payment, protest and notice of protest, and agree to remain fully bound notwithstanding the release of any party, extension or modification of terms, or discharge of any collateral for this note.


 


 


In the event payment is not timely made with respect to this Note, interest due hereon will accrue on the unpaid balance of the principal and the interest accrued and unpaid at the rate of 16% per annum, compounded daily, from and after the date of such failure to pay.


 


NOTICE TO BORROWER: THIS IS A DEMAND NOTE AND SO MAY BE COLLECED BY THE LENDER AT ANY TIME.  A NEW NOTE MUTUALLY AGREED UPON AND SUBSEQUENTLY ISSUED MAY CARRY A HIGHER OR LOWER RATE OF INTEREST.








	  	  	
GOOD HARBOR ACQUISITON CORP.


	  	  	  	  
	
Witnessed:

	  	  	  
	  	  	  	  
	
  

	  	
By:

	
/s/Parsh Patel


	
[Witness’s signature]

	  	  	
Parsh Patel, Chief Executive Officer


	
   

	  	  	  
	
[Witness’s typed or printed name]
Exhibit 4.49

[CONFORMED COPY]

Term sheet dated the 16th October 2002

Negative pledge

The undersigned:

SBS Broadcasting S.A., having its registered office in Luxembourg

declares:

to
hereby undertake, towards ING Bank N.V., which has its registered office in Amsterdam and a branch office in Amsterdam, Amstelplein 1, hereinafter referred to as the "Bank"

that
as long as the Bank is or will be entitled to claim any amount from:
SBS Broadcasting B.V., having its registered office at Amsterdam

or
any third party that from time to time has acceded to the credit arrangement with the Bank dated the 16th October 2002, hereinafter both collectively and individually referred
to as the "Borrower", on any grounds whatsoever, whether or not in current account and whether or not in the course of normal banking transactions,



|                       |  |                      
|---------------------- |  | ---------------------
|                       |  |                      
|Place                  |  | Date October 31, 2002
|                       |  |                      
|                       |  |                      
|Signature              |  | Signature            
|                       |  |                      
|ING Bank N.V.          |  | SBS Broadcasting S.A.
|Amsterdam Branch:      |  |                      
|/s/ W.G. van Wijgerden |  | /s/ Erik T. Moe      
|                       |  | Attorney-in-Fact     

---

QuickLinks
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-11503

Wanhua Chemical US Operations, LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_5-30-2019.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
Exhibit No. 32.1


Form 10-K


September 30, 2010


Truewest Corporation


File No.  33-56574








Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Truewest Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Glenn A. Little, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: November 10, 2010
By:
/s/ Glenn A. LittleGlenn A. LittleChief Executive Officer andChief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Truewest Corporation and will be retained by Truewest Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 41 (Thursday, March 2, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 11675]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5157]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service


Opportunity for Review and Comment on Draft Recovery Plan for the 
Spectacled Eider is Extended

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of document availability and public comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) announces the 
extension of a public review and comment period on a draft recovery 
plan for spectacled eiders (Somateria fischeri). The species occurs in 
arctic and sub-arctic regions of western and northern Alaska and along 
the arctic coast of Russia. The Service is proposing emphasis on 
recovery actions in these geographic areas. The original Notice of 
Availability for review and comment was published on October 25, 1994. 
The 120-day comment period was scheduled to close on February 23, 1995. 
Via this notice, the comment period is extended until March 17, 1995. 
All comments received during the entire period, October 25, 1994, 
through March 17, 1995, will be considered prior to finalization of the 
recovery plan.

ADDRESSES: Persons wishing to review the draft recovery plan may obtain 
a copy by contacting Teresa Woods at U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 
1011 E. Tudor Rd., Anchorage, Alaska, 99503-6199 and 907/786-3505. 
Written comments and materials regarding the plan should be addressed 
to Teresa Woods at the above address. Comments and materials received 
are available on request for public inspection, by appointment, during 
normal business hours at the above address.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Teresa Woods at the above address and 
telephone number.

Authority

    The authority for this action is Section 4(f) of the Endangered 
Species Act, 16 U.S.C. 1533(f).

    Dated: February 23, 1995.
David B. Allen,
Regional Director, Region 7, Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 95-5157 Filed 3-1-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
exv10w2






Exhibit 10.2




TERMINATION AGREEMENT




          This TERMINATION AGREEMENT dated as of July 4, 2011 (this “Agreement”) is by and among
Southern Union Company, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), Energy Transfer Equity,
L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the “Parent”), and Eric D. Herschmann
(“Consultant”).




          Reference is made to that certain Consulting Agreement dated as of June 15, 2011 by and among
the Company, the Parent and Consultant (the “Consulting Agreement”). Pursuant to Section
15 of the Consulting Agreement, the Company, the Parent and Consultant wish to amend and, at the
same time, terminate the Consulting Agreement.




          Accordingly, the Company, the Parent and Consultant hereby agree as follows:




          SECTION 1. Termination. Effective as of the date hereof, the Consulting Agreement
shall immediately terminate.




          SECTION 2. Release of Claims. Each party hereto does, for itself and for its
successors and assigns, hereby agree to waive, release, relinquish and forever release the other
parties hereto and their successors and assigns of and from all obligations, covenants, agreements,
promises, claims, demands, liabilities and causes of action whatsoever set forth in or arising
under the Consulting Agreement.




          SECTION 3. Amendment. This Agreement may not be amended or any provision hereof
waived or modified except in writing signed by each of the parties hereto.




          SECTION 4. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding on and inure to
the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns.




          SECTION 5. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in
accordance with, the laws of the State of Delaware, regardless of the laws that might otherwise
govern under applicable principles of conflicts of laws thereof.




          SECTION 6. Execution of Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed by the parties
hereto in separate counterparts (or upon separate signature pages bound together into one or more
counterparts), each of which, when so executed and delivered, shall be an original, but all such
counterparts shall together constitute one and the same instrument. Delivery of an executed
signature page to this Agreement by facsimile transmission shall be effective as delivery of a
manually executed counterpart hereof.




[signature page follows]





 









 








     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Agreement as of the date first written
above.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	ENERGY TRANSFER EQUITY, L.P.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ John W. McReynolds
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	John W. McReynolds 	 
	 	 	Title:  	President and Chief Financial Officer 	 
	 
	 	SOUTHERN UNION COMPANY

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ George Lindemann
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	George Lindemann 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Chairman and CEO 	 
	 
	 	Eric D. Herschmann

 	 
	 	/s/ Eric D. Herschmann
 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 




[Signature page to the Termination Agreement (Consulting)]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             544
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,159
<ALLOWANCES>                                       747
<INVENTORY>                                      5,548
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,409
<PP&E>                                         129,840
<DEPRECIATION>                                  47,566
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 154,284
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,132
<BONDS>                                        105,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,898
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   154,284
<SALES>                                         36,283
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,283
<CGS>                                           28,174
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   34,264
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    77
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,192
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,250)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (669)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (581)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (581)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
Exhibit 13.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Aptose Biosciences Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Gregory Chow, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”); and                                                                                                        
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the end of the period covered by the Report and the results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Report.





Date: March 29, 2017





/s/ Gregory Chow

Gregory Chow

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



This certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18
of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of Section 18 of the Exchange Act. Such certification shall not be deemed
to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the
extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          17,626
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,041
<ALLOWANCES>                                       200
<INVENTORY>                                      1,287
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,043
<PP&E>                                          63,203
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,883
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 110,659
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,127
<BONDS>                                        158,524
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            93
<OTHER-SE>                                    (71,085)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   110,659
<SALES>                                          3,739
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,530
<CGS>                                            1,155
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,757
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                26,912
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   200
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,293
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (31,550)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (709)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (31,550)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (32,277)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.74)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.74)
        

</TABLE>
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 48 (Monday, March 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13430-13431]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6036]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-186-000]

Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America; Notice of Report on Storage 
Utilization

March 7, 1995.
    Take notice that on March 1, 1995, Natural Gas Pipeline Company of 
America (Natural) tendered for filing its report on storage utilization 
during the first year of Natural's operation under Order Nos. 636, et 
seq.
    Natural states that the report is responsive to four specific 
requirements set out in Natural's restructuring orders in Docket No. 
RS92-45.
    Natural states that copies of the filing are being mailed to each 
of Natural's customers, and the parties in Docket No. RS92-45-000.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, NE, Washington, DC 
10426, in accordance with 18 CFR 385.214 and 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests should 
be filed on or before March 28, 1995. Protests will be considered by 
the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but 
will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. 
Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are 
[[Page 13431]] available for public inspection in the public reference 
room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-6036 Filed 3-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
#### Thomas Rafferty and another, Respondents, v. William Lockwood and another, Appellants.

Judgment reversed, new trial ordered, costs to appellants to abide event. Opinion by

Daniels, J.
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

August 5, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00274

- CR

Perry Ellis MAYFIELD

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 79th Judicial Distric t Court, Brooks County, Texas

Trial Court No. 11

- 07

- 10728

- CR

Honorable Richard C. Terrell, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

On July 9, 2014, this court dismissed this appeal for want of prosecution because

appellant failed to timely respond to this court’s order of June 12 , 2014, by providing proof that

the fee for preparing the clerk’s record had been paid . On July 16, 2014, appellant filed a motion

for rehearing stating the order to show cause was misinterpret ed by his staff and incorrectly

calendared. Additionally, the fee for preparing the clerk’s record was paid on July 14 , 2014.

It is therefore ORDERED that this court’s opinion and judgment dated July 9, 2014 are

WITHDRAWN BY THE COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION. Appellant’s motion for rehearing

is MOOT. The clerk’s recor d must be filed in this court no later than fifteen days from the date

of this order.

It is so ORDERED on the 5 th day of August , 201 4

. 

### PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

____________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

JUL 14 1998

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL ANTHONY COLLINS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

JAMES HUFF,

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 97-1443

(D.C. No. 97-WY-747-WD)

(D. Colo.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before KELLY, BARRETT, and HENRY, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously to grant the parties’ request for a decision on the briefs without oral

argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore

ordered submitted without oral argument.
-2-

Plaintiff Michael Anthony Collins appeals the district court’s grant of

summary judgment dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim against defendant,

Denver Police Detective James Huff. “We review the district court’s grant of

summary judgment de novo, applying the same standard used by the district court

under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c).” Novell, Inc. v. Federal Ins. Co., 141 F.3d 983, 985

(10th Cir. 1998). 

Collins asserts that Detective Huff violated his civil rights by omitting

material, exculpatory information when he prepared an affidavit to obtain an

arrest warrant for Mr. Collins for check fraud. It is a Fourth Amendment

violation to knowingly or recklessly omit from an arrest affidavit information

which, if included, would have vitiated probable cause. See Stewart v. Donges,

915 F.2d 572, 582-83 (10th Cir. 1990). After a thorough review of the record, we

agree with the district court’s conclusion that Mr. Collins presented no evidence

that even suggests that Detective Huff knowingly or recklessly disregarded the

truth when he prepared his affidavit and presented Mr. Collins’ arrest warrant. 

We therefore conclude that Detective Huff did not violate the Fourth Amendment. 

Accordingly, we affirm for substantially the reasons stated by the district court in

its order dated November 6, 1997.
-3-

The judgment of the United States District Court for the District of

Colorado is AFFIRMED.

Entered for the Court

James E. Barrett

Senior Circuit Judge