alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 49 (Tuesday, March 14, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 13728]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6199]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration


Comparing Treatments: Safety, Effectiveness, and Cost-
Effectiveness; Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that it 
is holding a meeting to explore methodological and regulatory issues in 
the design and review of studies intended to show differences or 
similarities among active drug and biological therapies. As the 
pharmaceutical marketplace evolves, there are new pressures on the 
developers of drug/biological products to demonstrate comparative 
effects. This meeting will examine the needs for this type of 
information, how the pharmaceutical industry is responding to new 
demands for comparative information, case-study experience ruling out 
biases in study design, the use of observational studies, 
methodological concerns in effectiveness trials, and promotional 
considerations. The study will examine issues concerning evaluation of 
safety, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Thursday, March 23, 1995, 8 a.m. to 
5:30 p.m., and on Friday, March 24, 1995, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the National Institutes of 
Health, Clinical Center, Bldg. 10, Jack Masur Auditorium, 9000 
Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD. Copies of the transcript of the meeting 
will be available from the contact person listed below. There is no 
registration fee for this meeting. Interested persons are encouraged to 
register early because space is limited.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Regarding information concerning the 
meeting and registration forms: Louis A. Morris, Center for Drug 
Evaluation and Research (HFD-240), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-594-6812, FAX 301-594-6759.

    Dated: March 8, 1995.
William B. Schultz,
Deputy Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 95-6199 Filed 3-13-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2173

Primex Family of Companies:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
## Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

In Re: Thomas Laughner

No. 06

- 14

- 00184

- CR Original Mandamus Proceeding

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice

Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice

Carter participating.

As stated in the C ourt’s opinion of this date, we find that Relator is not entitled to the

relief sought. Therefore, we deny the petition

.

RENDERED OCTOBER 22, 2014

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 (a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT I, Jack H. Brown, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of Stater Bros. Holdings Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the registrant and have:  a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
andc)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants fourth fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: May 6, 2005 /s/ Jack H. BrownJack H. BrownChairman of the Board, President,and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4294 

To terminate certain contracts relating to the construction of the border 

fence and to transfer unused border fence material to the States along 

the southwest border. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 24, 2022 

Ms. ERNST (for herself, Mr. CRUZ, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. MARSHALL, Mr. 

DAINES, and Mr. SCOTT of Florida) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To terminate certain contracts relating to the construction 

of the border fence and to transfer unused border fence 

material to the States along the southwest border. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLES. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Border’s Unused Idle 

5 and Lying Dormant Inventory Transfer Act’’ or the 

6 ‘‘BUILD IT Act’’. 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4294 IS

1 SEC. 2. TRANSFER OF UNUSED BORDER FENCE MATERIAL 

2 TO BORDER STATES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi4 sion of law, not later than 90 days after the date of the 

5 enactment of this Act, the Federal Government shall de6 liver to the governments of Arizona, California, New Mex7 ico, and Texas, upon request, any materials associated 

8 with the construction of the barrier along international 

9 border between the United States and Mexico that— 

10 (1) are in the possession of the Department of 

11 Homeland Security, the Department of Defense, or 

12 any other Federal agency; or 

13 (2) have been purchased by the Federal Gov14 ernment, but remain in the possession of any con15 tractor or vendor. 

16 (b) PROHIBITION OF FEES AND DELIVERY

17 CHARGES.—The Federal Government may not charge any 

18 fee or other delivery charge to any of the States referred 

19 to in subsection (a) for the delivery of the materials de20 scribed in subsection (a). 

21 (c) USE OF MATERIALS.—Any State receiving mate22 rials pursuant to subsection (a) shall use such materials 

23 for the purpose of barrier construction along the inter24 national border between the United States and Mexico. 

25 (d) TERMINATION OF EXISTING CONTRACTS.—The 

26 Federal Government shall terminate, at the convenience 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4294 IS

1 of the Government, any contract relating to the mainte2 nance and security of the materials intended for the con3 struction referred to in subsection (a) that— 

4 (1) is in effect on the date of the enactment of 

5 this Act; and 

6 (2) must be terminated in order to comply with 

7 subsection (a). 

Æ 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of EBS Building, LLC (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Keith F. Cooper, Senior Managing Director of
the Manager of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title
18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
                    Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Commission or its staff upon request.

| | /s/ Keith F. Cooper                                                                                                                                    
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                                                                                                        
| |                                                                                                                                                        
| | Keith F. Cooper, Senior Managing Director
                                                              FTI Consulting, as Manager EBS Building, L.L.C.
| | May 13, 2005
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 18, 2018.

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-18-00681-CV

NO. 14-18-00682-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M. E. H. 

On Appeal from the 345th District Court 

Travis County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. D-1-AG-15-002375 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

Appeal number 14-18-00681-CV is an appeal from the “Order on Motion to 

Modify Judgment” signed May 10, 2018. Appeal number 14-18-00682-CV is an 

appeal from the “Amended Order” signed July 9, 2018.

Appellant C.H. filed a motion on September 10, 2018, in a related appeal, 

number 14-18-00281-CV, in which she states she is abandoning appeals 14-18-

00681-CV and 14-18-00682-CV. We construe that statement as a request for 

voluntary dismissal of those appeals. Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). The request is 

granted. The appeals are DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Jamison, and Brown.
EXHIBIT 10.12


                                 PROMISSORY NOTE


                                                                  April 17, 2003


      FOR VALUED RECEIVED, GREG MANNING AUCTIONS, INC. (the "Borrower"), a
corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware, hereby
unconditionally promises to pay to the order of Banco Santander Central Hispano,
S.A. New York Branch (the "Bank") US$900,000 (NINE HUNDRED THOUSAND UNITED
STATES DOLLARS) at 45 East 53rd Street, New York, NY 10022, or such other
address as may be specified by the Bank pursuant to the credit agreement dated
April 17, 2003 between Borrower and the Bank (the "Credit Agreement"), or such
other office as the Bank may specify to Borrower in writing, in lawful money of
the United States of America and immediately available funds, on April 12, 2004.
The Borrower further promises to pay interest in like money and funds at such
office on the unpaid principal amount of the loan evidenced hereby from and
including the date thereof until payment in full thereof at Prime Rate plus 0.25
per cent per annum.

      The proceeds of this Loan will be used for working capital purposes.

      It is agreed that if the terms of this Promissory Note contradict or
conflict with the terms of the Credit Agreement, the terms of the Credit
Agreement shall control and govern. On the occurrence and during the existence
of any one or more of the Events of Default specified in the Credit Agreement,
all amounts then remaining unpaid on this Promissory Note may be declared to be
immediately due and payable as provided in the Credit Agreement.

      THIS PROMISSORY NOTE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.




                                      GREG MANNING AUCTIONS, INC.



                                      By: /s/ Greg Manning
                                         -------------------------------
                                      Name:  Greg Manning
                                      Title: President and Chief Executive
                                             Officer
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

April 12, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3742

ECM Industries LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_04.15.19.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 9, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6843-6844]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02512]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Notice of Availability of Record of Decision for the Final 
Environmental Impact Statement/Legislative Environmental Impact 
Statement for Renewal of the Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake 
Public Land Withdrawal, California

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy (DoN), after carefully weighing the 
strategic, operational, and environmental consequences of the proposed 
action, announces its decision to both accommodate future military 
operational increases and implement

[[Page 6844]]

and complete a revised Comprehensive Land Use Management Plan (CLUMP) 
at Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake (NAWSCL), California as set out 
in Alternative 1 of the Final Environmental Impact Statement/
Legislative Environmental Impact Statement (Final EIS/LEIS) for Renewal 
of Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake Public Land Withdrawal. 
Implementation of this alternative includes Congressional renewal of 
the public land withdrawal (25-year renewal), accommodation of an 
increase in Research, Development, Acquisition, Test, and Evaluation 
and training tempo (up to 25 percent) within current land use areas 
approved for designated uses, expansion of unmanned aerial and surface 
systems, and expansion of existing and introduction of evolving 
directed energy weapons development. Nonmilitary activities would 
continue according to current patterns of use. Proposed land use 
changes would be accommodated in accordance with the CLUMP and 
applicable NAWSCL approval processes. Natural and cultural resources 
would continue to be conserved with implementation of the CLUMP 
management process.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The complete text of the Record of Decision 
is available at http://www.chinalakeeis.com. Single copies of the 
Record of Decision are available upon request by contacting: Naval 
Facilities Engineering Command Southwest, Attn: Teresa Bresler, 1220 
Pacific Highway, San Diego, CA 92132.

    Dated: February 3, 2016.
N.A. Hagerty-Ford,
Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal Register 
Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2016-02512 Filed 2-8-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
#### STATE v. MONROE LEE.

(Filed 23 March, 1938.)

Criminal Law § 85—

Where, on a former appeal, a new trial is awarded for error in the admission of evidence, but it is determined that the evidence was sufficient to be submitted to the jury, a motion to nonsuit upon the second trial upon substantially the same evidence is correctly denied.

Appeal by defendant from *Burgwyn, Special Judge,*at September Term, 1937, of Habnett. No error.

Defendant was indicted for willfully and wantonly burning a barn, tbe property of Wilson Lucas. From judgment pronounced on verdict of guilty defendant appealed.

*Attorney-General Seawell and Assistant Attorneys-General McMullan and Willis for the State.*

*J. R. Young and I. R. Williams for defendant.*

*320Per Curiam.

Tbe principal question presented by tbis appeal is tbe correctness of tbe ruling of tbe court below in denying defendant’s motion for judgment as of nonsuit. When tbis same case was bere on tbe defendant’s appeal at Spring Term, 1937 (211 N. C., 326), a new trial was awarded for error in tbe admission of evidence. In tbat case it was said: “While tbe evidence was entirely circumstantial, and included testimony as to tbe action of bloodhounds, admitted for tbe purpose of corroboration, we are unable to say that tbis did not constitute more than a scintilla of evidence, and so sufficient to take tbe case to tbe jury. *S. v. Thompson,*192 N. C., 704.”

Substantially tbe same testimony was presented by tbe State in tbis last trial, and again tbe jury has found tbe defendant guilty. Tbe motion for judgment of nonsuit was properly denied.

Tbe other exceptions noted at tbe trial and assigned as error cannot be sustained. We find no sufficient reason to disturb tbe result of tbe trial.

No error.
exhibit_4-5.htm











EXHIBIT 4.5




 


RRsat Global Communications Network Ltd.


 


Amendment to 2006 Israel Equity Incentive Plan







Effective as of June 28, 2011, the RRsat Global Communications Network Ltd. 2006 Israel Equity Incentive Plan (the "Plan") is hereby amended as follows (the "Amendment"):








	 	
1. 

	
The first sentence of Section 3(a) of the Plan is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:












"Subject to the provisions of Section 18 of the Plan, the maximum aggregate number of Shares which may be issued under the Plan is 961,397 Shares."









	 	
2.

	
Section 7 of the Plan is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:









 


"Term of Plan.  The Plan shall continue in effect until December 31, 2020."


 



	 	
3. 

	
Except as explicitly amended by this Amendment, all other terms of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4266 

To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 to increase funding 

for stormwater management for Atlanta, Georgia, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 19 (legislative day, MAY 17), 2022 

Mr. OSSOFF introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 

to increase funding for stormwater management for Atlanta, Georgia, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘City of Atlanta 

5 Stormwater Management Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT, ATLANTA, GEORGIA. 

7 Section 219(e)(5) of the Water Resources Develop8 ment Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 110 Stat. 3757; 113 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 4266 IS

1 Stat. 334) is amended by striking ‘‘$25,000,000’’ and in2 serting ‘‘$75,000,000’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB