alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 55 (Wednesday, March 22, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15147]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7055]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration for Children and Families


Agency Information Collection Under OMB Review

    Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 
Chapter 35), the Administration for Children and Families (ACF) has 
submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) a request for 
the continued use of an information collection titled: ACF-231-Aid To 
Families With Dependent Children Financial Report; Expenditures and 
Estimates.
    Addresses: Copies of the request for approval may be obtained from 
Robert A. Sargis of the Office of Information Systems Management, ACF, 
by calling (202) 690-7275.
    Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions received 
within 60 days of publication. Written comments and recommendations for 
the proposed information should be sent directly to the following: 
Wendy Taylor, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of 
Management and Budget, Docket Library, Room 10102, 725 17th Street, 
N.W., Washington, D.C. 20503, (202) 395-7316.

Information on Document

Title: ACF--231 AID TO FAMILIES WITH DEPENDENT CHILDREN FINANCIAL 
REPORT
OMB No.: 0970-0032
Description: The information collected is required by the Social 
Security Act to collect program and financial data under the AFDC 
program The State agency provides a quarterly estimate of the total 
amount and the Federal share of expenditures to be made in 
administering the AFDC programs.
Respondents: State governments
Annual Number of Respondents: 54 sites
Number of responses per respondent: 6
Total annual responses: 324 sites
Hours per response: 3.5
Total Burden Hours: 1,134

    Dated: March 16, 1995.
Roberta Katson,
Acting Director, Office of Information Resource Management.
[FR Doc. 95-7055 Filed 3-21-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-M
#### In the Matter of P.W.K. A.E.K. and F.J.K., Respondents, v. L.A.K., Appellant.

No. 61721.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

May 25, 1993.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied June 23, 1993.

Application to Transfer Denied Aug. 17, 1993.

William P. Grant, Clayton, for appellant.

Robert P. Baine, Jr., Chester B. Hayes, Florissant, for respondents.

Before AHRENS, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

L.A.K., the biological mother of P.W.K. (Child), appeals from a final adoption decree granting adoption of Child to Child’s paternal grandparents. We affirm per Rule 84.16(b). The trial court’s order is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties *434have been furnished with a memorandum for their information, only.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.29

              SUMMARY OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PROGRAM

1.   An annual retainer in the amount of $40,000 for each non-employee director.

2.   An additional annual retainer in the amount of $20,000 for the Lead
     Director.

3.   A meeting fee of $1,000 for each Board or Committee meeting attended in
     person or telephonically, except that each member of the Audit Committee
     shall receive $1,500, rather than $1,000 for each Audit Committee meeting
     attended in person or telephonically.

4.   An annual fee of $2,500 for each member of the Audit Committee, provided
     that the Chair of the Audit Committee shall receive $20,000, rather than
     $2,500 for such Committee service.

5.   An annual fee of $10,000 for the Chair of the Compensation Committee, and
     an annual fee of $5,000 for the Chair of the Nominating & Governance
     Committee.

6.   An annual fee of not to exceed $20,000 for the Chair of each Committee
     that may be established from time to time other than the Audit Committee,
     Compensation Committee, and Nominating & Governance Committee.

7.   An annual restricted stock award of 1,500 shares to be made following the
     certification of the director election results from each annual meeting of
     the Company's stockholders to each non-employee director who then holds
     office. Each restricted stock award will be made pursuant to a restricted
     stock agreement adopted pursuant to the Company's 2003 Incentive Stock
     Plan (the "2003 Plan") (or an alternative plan upon the
     expiration of the 2003 Plan), providing that each award will vest one-third
     on the date of grant and one-third on each of the first and second
     anniversaries of the date of the grant. Vesting will be accelerated upon
     the director's retirement or the failure of the director to be re-nominated
     for election to the Board upon expiration of the director's current term in
     office. Each director will be entitled to receive any cash dividends paid
     with respect to shares subject to a restricted stock award, regardless of
     whether the award is fully vested.

8.   A restricted stock award of 1,500 shares for each new non-employee director
     when the director joins the Board. The terms of this restricted stock award
     will match those of the annual restricted stock award described above.

9.   Reimbursement of expenses incurred by each director in attending meetings.
Exhibit 12.1
   Sept. 25,
    
    
    Sept. 24,
    
    
    Sept. 30,
    
    
    Sept. 28,
    
    
    Sept. 27,2005(1)
    
    
    2006(1)
    
    
    2007(1)
    
    
    2008(1)
    
    
    2009(1)Earnings:Income before income taxes
    
    $
    39,908
    
    
    $
    44,011
    
    
    $
    82,674
    
    
    $
    66,630
    
    
    $
    54,250Amortization of capitalized interest
    
    
    251
    
    
    
    219
    
    
    
    226
    
    
    
    469
    
    
    
    849Interest
    
    
    55,211
    
    
    
    58,476
    
    
    
    67,849
    
    
    
    65,531
    
    
    
    65,572Less interest capitalized during
the period
    
    
    (1,111
    )
    
    
    (4,276
    )
    
    
    (9,806
    )
    
    
    (11,261
    )
    
    
    (522
    )Net amortization of debt discount
and premium and issuance
expense
    
    
    3,042
    
    
    
    3,038
    
    
    
    5,496
    
    
    
    3,193
    
    
    
    3,202Interest portion of rental expense
    
    
    25,461
    
    
    
    23,681
    
    
    
    21,762
    
    
    
    23,021
    
    
    
    25,319Earnings as adjusted
    
    $
    122,762
    
    
    $
    125,149
    
    
    $
    168,201
    
    
    $
    147,583
    
    
    $
    148,670Fixed charges:Interest
    
    $
    55,211
    
    
    $
    58,476
    
    
    $
    67,849
    
    
    $
    65,531
    
    
    $
    65,572Net amortization of debt discount
and premium and issuance
expense
    
    
    3,042
    
    
    
    3,038
    
    
    
    5,496
    
    
    
    3,193
    
    
    
    3,202Interest portion of rental expense
    
    
    25,461
    
    
    
    23,681
    
    
    
    21,762
    
    
    
    23,021
    
    
    
    25,319Fixed charges
    
    $
    83,714
    
    
    $
    85,195
    
    
    $
    95,107
    
    
    $
    91,745
    
    
    $
    94,093Ratio of Earnings
to Fixed Charges
    
    
    1.47
    
    
    
    1.47
    
    
    
    1.77
    
    
    
    1.61
    
    
    
    1.58
 
 (1)
    
    Fiscal years 2005, 2006, 2008 and 2009 were 52-week years while fiscal 2007 was
a 53-week year.
#### Terry UMFLEET, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 68378.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

June 11, 1996.

Raymund J. Capelovitch, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for Appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, David R. Truman, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for Respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and AHRENS, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
EXHIBIT 27 --  THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL
INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PAYLESS SHOESOURCE, INC. CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EARNINGS FOR THE 39 WEEKS ENDED OCTOBER
31, 1998, AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF OCTOBER
31, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001060232
<NAME> PAYLESS SHOESOURCE,INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                         102,400<F1>
<SECURITIES>                                         0<F2>
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,900<F3>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F3>
<INVENTORY>                                    353,300
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               480,900
<PP&E>                                         923,900
<DEPRECIATION>                                 429,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,003,500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          211,300
<BONDS>                                          5,200<F4>
<COMMON>                                           300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     737,900<F5>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,003,500
<SALES>                                      2,047,100<F6>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,047,100
<CGS>                                        1,394,600
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,394,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (6,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                200,800
<INCOME-TAX>                                    80,100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            120,700
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   120,700
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.35<F7>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.31<F7>
<FN>
<F1>Includes cash equivalent securities.
<F2>Any "securities" are shown under "Cash".
<F3>Receivables are net after deduction of allowances.
<F4>Consists of Capital Lease Obligations.
<F5>Reflects Retained Earnings and Additional Paid In Capital.
<F6>Reflects net sales.
<F7>Expressed in dollars.
</FN>


<PAGE>


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterended March 31, 2005 (the “Form 10-Q”) of Cardinal Financial Corporation, I,Robert A. Cern, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, herebycertify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

(a)           theForm 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(b)           the information contained in the Form10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financialcondition and results of operations of the Company and its subsidiaries as of,and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.

 

 
| Date:   May 9, 2005 |   /s/ Robert A. Cern                        |   |
|--------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                     | Robert A. Cern                                        |
|                     | Executive Vice President and Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 14

- 00125

- CR

CHARLES RAY MILLER, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 8th District Court Hopkins County, Texas Trial Court No. 1423722

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter2 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION
In cause numbers 06

- 14

- 00120

- CR through 06

- 14

- 00129

- CR, Charles Ray Miller appeals from ten separate convictions for indecency with a child by contact. Miller has filed a single
brief in which he raises an issue common to all of his appeals. Miller argues that he received ineffective assistance of counsel during the punishment phase of his trial. We addressed this issue in detail in our opinion of this date on Miller’s appeal in cau se
number 06

- 14

- 00120

- CR. For the reasons stated therein, we likewise conclude in this matter that Miller failed to demonstrate (1) that his counsel’s performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and (2) that there is a reasonable probab ility that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different. Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668 (1984) ); Ex parte Imoudu , 284 S.W.3d 866, 869 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009). Consequently, we affirm the trial co urt’s judgment.

Jack Carter Justice
Date Submitted: December 11, 2014 Date Decided: December 12, 2014
Do Not Publish
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          17,234
<SECURITIES>                                    12,788
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,670
<ALLOWANCES>                                       573
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                40,839
<PP&E>                                           4,518
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,553
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  42,845
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,820
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           107
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,076
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    42,845
<SALES>                                         11,412
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,412
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,338
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,994
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   3
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (491)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (591)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (591)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)


</TABLE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4182

New York Air Brake LLC:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_03.20.19.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
exv10w1






Exhibit 10.1




TERMINATION AGREEMENT




          This TERMINATION AGREEMENT dated as of July 4, 2011 (this “Agreement”) is by and among
Southern Union Company, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), Energy Transfer Equity,
L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the “Parent”), and George L. Lindemann
(“Consultant”).




          Reference is made to that certain Consulting Agreement dated as of June 15, 2011 by and among
the Company, the Parent and Consultant (the “Consulting Agreement”). Pursuant to Section
15 of the Consulting Agreement, the Company, the Parent and Consultant wish to amend and, at the
same time, terminate the Consulting Agreement.




          Accordingly, the Company, the Parent and Consultant hereby agree as follows:




          SECTION 1. Termination. Effective as of the date hereof, the Consulting Agreement shall immediately
terminate.




          SECTION
2. Release of Claims. Each party hereto does, for itself and for its successors and assigns,
hereby agree to waive, release, relinquish and forever release the other parties hereto and their
successors and assigns of and from all obligations, covenants, agreements, promises, claims,
demands, liabilities and causes of action whatsoever set forth in or arising under the Consulting
Agreement.




          SECTION
3. Amendment. This Agreement may not be amended or any provision hereof waived or modified
except in writing signed by each of the parties hereto.




          SECTION
4. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of the
parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns.




          SECTION
5. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the
laws of the State of Delaware, regardless of the laws that might otherwise govern under applicable
principles of conflicts of laws thereof.




          SECTION
6. Execution of Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed by the parties hereto in
separate counterparts (or upon separate signature pages bound together into one or more
counterparts), each of which, when so executed and delivered, shall be an original, but all such
counterparts shall together constitute one and the same instrument. Delivery of an executed
signature page to this Agreement by facsimile transmission shall be effective as delivery of a
manually executed counterpart hereof.




[signature page follows]





 









 








     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Agreement as of the date first written
above.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	ENERGY TRANSFER EQUITY, L.P.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ John W. McReynolds
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	John W. McReynolds 	 
	 	 	Title:  	President and Chief Financial Officer 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	SOUTHERN UNION COMPANY

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Eric Herschmann
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Eric Herschmann 	 
	 	 	Title:  	President and COO 	 
	 
	 	George L. Lindemann

 	 
	 	/s/ George L. Lindemann
 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 



[Signature page to the Termination Agreement (Consulting)]
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 23 , 2016

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14- 16 -00370- CV

MARVINELL HARLAN, Appellant

V. TRAVELERS FLOOD INSURANCE, ROBERT DEAN, OWNER, DARRELL PYE, CINDY SEXTON OF DEAN AND DRAPER INSURANCE AGENCY, LP, Appellees

On Appeal from the 127th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2013-76980

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This appeal is from a judgment signed February 11, 2016. No clerk’s record has been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record.

On July 15, 2016, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days,2

appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).
Appellant has not provided this court with proof of payment for the record. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Busby, Donovan, and Brown.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 53 (Monday, March 20, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 14734]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6824]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Business Development Center Applications: San Juan, PR

AGENCY: Minority Business Development Agency, Commerce.

ACTION: Cancellation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Minority Business Development Agency is cancelling the 
announcement to solicit competitive applications under its Minority 
Business Development Center (MBDC) Program to operate its San Juan 
MBDC. This solicitation was originally published in the Federal 
Register, Wednesday, March 8, 1995, Vol. 60, No. 45, 12742.

11.800  Minority Business Development Center

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance)

    Dated: March 13, 1995.
Donald L. Powers,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, Minority Business Development Agency.
[FR Doc. 95-6824 Filed 3-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-21-P
#### Ausey E. McCOMB, Claimant-Appellant, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Employer-Respondent, and Treasurer of the State of Missouri as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Respondent.

No. 66422.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

March 28, 1995.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 26, 1995.

Application to Transfer Denied May 30, 1995.

Ausey E. McComb pro se.

Daniel J. Harlan, St. Louis, for employer/respondent.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Cynthia A. Quetsch, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for Second Injury Fund.

Before CRANE, P.J., and CRANDALL and WHITE, JJ.

*ORDER*

Claimant, Ausey E. McComb, appeals from a workers’ compensation award issued by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission.

The order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. No error of law appears. A written opinion would have no precedential value. The order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).