alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>







                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1



                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Annual Report of Metretek Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, W. Phillip Marcum, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and result of
               operations of the Company.



                                         /s/  W. Phillip Marcum
                                         ------------------------------------


                                         W. Phillip Marcum
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer
                                         March 28, 2003




                                       1
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-14-0000510

24-AUG-2015

08:24 AM
EXHIBIT 32
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Salisbury Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John F.
Perotti,  Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  and I, John F. Foley,  Chief
Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/  John F. Perotti                             /s/  John F. Foley
----------------------                           ------------------
     John F. Perotti                                  John F. Foley
     Chief Executive Officer                          Chief Financial Officer





                                       25
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM 10Q
FILING AT MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001059498
<NAME> AMERICAN LAWYER MEDIA, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             388
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,014
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,893
<INVENTORY>                                      1,417
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,810
<PP&E>                                          22,037
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,854
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 347,301
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           39,130
<BONDS>                                        175,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      76,577
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   347,301
<SALES>                                         38,843
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,843
<CGS>                                           15,891
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   42,869
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (13)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,930
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,943)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (806)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,137)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,137)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 13, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3752

Omega Environmental Technologies, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RYAN BAUMGARDNER,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 92 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of August, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3007

C&K Components, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
#### JAMES F. PACE v. CITY OF CHARLOTTE.

(Filed 29 April, 1942.)

Municipal Corporations § 14—

This action was instituted by a pedestrian who, while walking on crutches, was injured when one of his crutches went into a hole in the grassy strip between the sidewalk and the street, causing him to fall. There was evidence that the hole was 3 or 4 inches in diameter, partially filled with leaves and trash so that it was not observable. *Held:*The municipality’s motion to nonsuit was properly granted.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Pless, J.,*at February Term, 1942, of MecexeNbueg.

Civil action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff on a public street in the city of Charlotte.

The plaintiff is a one-legged man and walks on crutches. At about “dusk-dark” on the evening of 20 September, 1940, he was walking on the easterly sidewalk of North Graham Street with his right crutch and foot on the paved portion of the sidewalk and his left crutch on the grassy strip between the paved portion of the sidewalk and the curbing. His left crutch went into a hole in the grassy strip, and plaintiff was thrown out into the street and injured. He says, “My crutch went in the hole, and I went out in the road. I hurt my knee. My head hit the asphalt.” The plaintiff lost no time from his work.

The hole was 3 or 4 inches in diameter, 15 or 18 inches deep, partially filled with leaves and trash, and grass had grown over it so that it was not observable. The city engineer on looking for it after the injury at first passed it without seeing it. It was too small for a man’s foot, but large enough for a crutch.

From judgment of nonsuit entered at the close of plaintiff’s evidence, he appeals, assigning error.

*J. M. Scarborough for plaintiff, appellant.*

*Tillett & Campbell for defendant, appellee.*

Pee Ctjeiam.

A careful perusal of the record leaves us with the impression that the judgment of nonsuit should be upheld. *Watkins v. Raleigh,*214 N. C., 644, 200 S. E., 424; *Houston v. Monroe,*213 N. C., 788, 197 S. E., 571; *Gettys v. Marion,*218 N. C., 266, 10 S. E. (2d), 799.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

STATEMENT UNDER OATH OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER REGARDING FACTS AND
CIRCUMSTANCES RELATING TO EXCHANGE ACT FILINGS

I, Ullrich E. Porzig, Senior Vice President - Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer of Payless ShoeSource, Inc. ("Payless"), state and attest that:

(1)  To the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the covered reports of
     Payless, and, except as corrected or supplemented in a subsequent covered
     report:

     o    no covered report contained an untrue statement of a material fact as
          of the end of the period covered by such report (or in the case of a
          report on Form 8-K or definitive proxy materials, as of the date on
          which it was filed); and

     o    no covered report omitted to state a material fact necessary to make
          the statements in the covered report, in light of the circumstances
          under which they were made, not misleading as of the end of the period
          covered by such report (or in the case of a report on Form 8-K or
          definitive proxy materials, as of the date on which it was filed).

(2)  I have reviewed the contents of this statement with Payless' Audit and
     Finance Committee.

(3)  In this statement under oath, each of the following, if filed on or before
     the date of this statement, is a "covered report":

     o    2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Payless filed with the Commission;

     o    all reports on Form 10-Q, all reports on Form 8-K and all definitive
          proxy materials of Payless filed with the Commission subsequent to the
          filing of the Form 10-K identified above; and

     o    any amendments to any of the foregoing.

                                         Subscribed and sworn to before me this
/s/ Ullrich E. Porzig                    13th day of September, 2002.
---------------------------------------
Ullrich E. Porzig
Senior Vice President - Chief Financial  /s/ Deborah A. Ortega
Officer and Treasurer                    ---------------------------------------
Payless ShoeSource, Inc.                 Notary Public
September 13, 2002                       My Commission Expires: December 2, 2004
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C.SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Shoe Carnival, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending February
2, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Mark L. Lemond, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. |  | The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and                               
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. |  | The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the Company.

|Date:   April
      17, 2008 | By:                           | /s/ Mark L.
      Lemond | 
|---------------------------- | ----------------------------- | ------------------------ | 
|                             | Mark L. Lemond                |                         
|                             | President and                 |                         
|                             | Chief Executive
      Officer |                         

---
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 13, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3743

Omega Environmental Technologies, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
rvSXe. k

To! TkOfAct Of Dnt Clerk

luiel-f +h G>urT Of Apppcls

I - | CATHY S. W

rrryn! Ross CiMonrl RiLWdf/yi ttllb^'J^O

BftyrJ Ltiil. O-OH

300 SpurJ13

feagut JX. 158fc0

Re*. CWNo. l3iS-00l3KK

HJI _

I VlaW. f££#W Lj VtLOrnL QuJaf^ 4-locf 1

Via J &ricjnT "fc> RtfrllrV) F/)r D^Cf^TIO/lOfy RWi/mo Cp/D.kO m-Hop. Court Of Cjr\m\\na\ App&Js in Ausfin Awes .1 f£sp£cf£Jly f£GLues*f +o

k/iGuu uuVi^rViPr or noT vtil/ Attorw&y Willic/n

Curktj HIpJ ujiTKi -mrt Court pcao-f rriof X

fexStMcc) nofica o-F wy fi^ht fo riif a RD.fr.

I diVJ vnnT f<?-U£V£ Ony .Suck fio"hC£ by C£fT|-

-Pi£/J mail or oih(?ruJ^£. V)pc&£ noirf^ m^*if

o

cc.wk

REC'D IN COURT OF APPEALS

12thCourt of Appeals District

DuL "0 Mf.RcW^viS /IrtkfifiS 4te forreSpMcWtf uJAS pC€" parcel loy Z5tm/hLj HflLPl££S£ ho^ord fo Hf-Rich^c/s^,

1
#### WILLIE LANGLEY v. HOME SECURITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY.

(Filed 4 March, 1931.)

Appeal by plaintiff from *DeVin, J.,*at January Term, 1931, of Pitt. Civil action to recover on a contract of insurance.

From a judgment of nonsuit tbe plaintiff appeals, assigning errors.

*P. B. Hines for plaintiff.*

*No counsel appearing for defendant.*

Per CuriaM.

It appears from plaintiff’s own testimony that tbe policy in suit lapsed from tbe nonpayment of premiums long before tbe institution of tbe present action. Tbe judgment of nonsuit is correct.

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7513

JHAN P. GIBBS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DONALD F. BAUKNECHT, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (6:07-cv-00735-GRA)

Submitted: January 17, 2008 Decided: January 28, 2008

Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jhan P. Gibbs, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant

United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Jhan P. Gibbs, a federal prisoner, appeals the district

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge

and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Gibbs v. Bauknecht, No. 6:07-cv-00735-GRA (D.S.C. Sept. 27,

2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000882342
<NAME> 90CC
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          66,221
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,400
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               107,621
<PP&E>                                       5,765,217
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,861,804
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,011,034
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,398
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     997,636
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,011,034
<SALES>                                        430,499
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               435,246
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  693,871
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (258,625)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (258,625)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (258,625)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (34.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit
10.4**
 **OPTION
AGREEMENT**
 
 
 This
Option Agreement evidences the grant of a stock option (the "Option") to
purchase shares of common stock, par value $.001 (the "Company Stock"), of
Generex Biotechnology Corporation (the "Company") granted to **John
Barratt** (the
"Optionee") pursuant to the Generex Biotechnology Corporation 2001 Stock Option
Plan (the “Plan”), a copy of which is attached to this Option Agreement and
incorporated into this Option Agreement by reference. The Option is subject to
the terms, conditions, limitations and restrictions set forth in the Plan,
including the following:
 
 a.  The date
of grant of the Option is **April
5, 2005** and the
number of shares of Company Stock that may be purchased upon exercise of the
Option is **100,000
(One Hundred Thousand Dollars)** .
 
 b.  The
purchase price (the “Exercise Price”) of Company Stock subject to the Option is
 **$0.56** per
share.
 
 c.  The
Option is fully vested upon issuance.
 
 d.  Unless
sooner terminated pursuant to the Plan, the Option shall terminate on **April
4, 2010.** Option
will survive the termination of the Optionee’s employment.
 
 e.  The
Optionee shall pay the Exercise Price for the Option (i) in cash or (ii) by such
other method as may be approved by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s
Board of Directors. The Optionee shall pay the amount of any withholding tax due
at the time of exercise, as provided in the Plan.
 
 f.  The
rights and interests of the Optionee under this Option Agreement may not be
sold, assigned, encumbered or otherwise transferred, except, in the event of the
death of the Optionee, by will or by the laws of descent and
distribution.
 
 g.  Any
notice to the Company, including notice of exercise of an Option, shall be
addressed to the Company in care of Slava Jarnitskii at the Company’s principal
offices.
 
 IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, this Option Agreement has been executed on behalf of the
Company by a duly authorized officer and by the Optionee effective as of the
date of grant of the Option.


GENEREX BIOTECHNOLOGY
      CORPORATION
    
    
    ACCEPTED AND AGREED:By:
    /s/ Rose C. Perri
    
    
    /s/
      John BarrattROSE C. PERRI
    
    
    John
Barratt