alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3119

Sowa Tool & Machine Co. Ltd:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
Exhibit 32.1








Certification of CEO Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of GAMCO Investors, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Mario J. Gabelli, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Mario J. Gabelli


Name: Mario J. Gabelli


Title:   Chief Executive Officer


Date:   August 2, 2011





This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-60114 and
333-117231) relating to the 2000 Stock Option and Incentive Plan of Shoe
Carnival, Inc., the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-74050 and
333-44047) relating to the 1993 Stock Option and Incentive Plan of Shoe
Carnival, Inc., the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-80979) relating
to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Shoe Carnival, Inc., and the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-82819) relating to the Outside Directors Stock
Option Plan of Shoe Carnival, Inc., of our reports relating to the consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedule of Shoe Carnival, Inc. and
subsidiaries (which report expressed an unqualified opinion and includes an
explanatory paragraph relating to the Companys adoption of Financial Accounting
Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainties in Income
Taxes and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (Revised 2004),
Share-Based Payment) and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting dated April 14, 2008, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Shoe Carnival, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended February 2,
2008.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE
LLP

Indianapolis, IndianaApril 17,
2008

---
#### WYLIE HUNNICUTT, Administrator of the Estate of JAMES HUNNICUTT, Deceased, v. JASPER KIMBRELL, by His Guardian Ad Litem, W. H. ABERNATHY, and MRS. MYRA KIMBRELL.

(Filed 12 December, 1934.)

Appeal and Error J e: Automobiles C i—

The charge of the court on the question of defendant’s contributory negligence upon evidence tending to show that defendant was walking along the highway on the right side thereof in violation of a State Highway ordinance is not held for reversible error for its failure to contain a precise definition of contributory negligence.

Civil ACTION, before *Shaw, Emergency J.,*at April, 1934, Special Term, of MeCKLENbubg.

Tbe evidence tended to sbow tbat tbe deceased, James Hunnicutt, on or about 28 January, 1933, was walking on tbe rigbt-band side of tbe highway, and tbat an automobile driven by Jasper Elimbrell and owned by bis mother, Myra Kimbrell, approached tbe deceased, traveling in tbe same direction. Tbe plaintiff alleged tbat tbe car driven by Jasper Kimbrell, who was a minor, was a family car, and tbat be was operating it in a reckless and negligent manner, without keeping a proper lookout and driving at an unlawful rate of speed, and tbat as a result be negligently struck and killed James Hunnicutt. Tbe defendant alleged tbat tbe deceased was walking on tbe wrong side of tbe road in violation of an ordinance duly adopted by tbe Highway Commission requiring pedestrians to walk on tbe left-hand side of tbe highway, and tbat as tbe car approached plaintiff’s intestate be suddenly stepped in front of tbe car, and tbat bis injury And death was proximately caused by bis own negligence.

Issues of negligence, contributory negligence, and damages were submitted to tbe jury. Tbe verdict declared tbat tbe defendant was guilty of negligence, and tbat plaintiff’s intestate also by bis own negligence contributed to bis injury and death. Judgment was entered upon tbe verdict tbat tbe plaintiff take nothing by bis action, and tbe plaintiff appealed.

*Carswell & Ervin for plaintiff.*

*Ralph V. Kidd for defendants.*

Pee Cubiam.

Tbe assignments of error are based upon tbe charge of tbe trial judge in failing to fully explain to tbe jury tbe applicable principles of law.

*495Tbe judge defined negligence and proximate cause. While be did not give a formal definition of contributory negligence, be instructed tbe jury: “If plaintiff’s intestate was walking on tbe rigbt-band side of tbe road, as claimed by tbe defendant, be was violating tbe-law, and tbat would be negligence on bis part, and if sueb negligence was tbe proximate cause of bis injury and death, tbat would be contributory negligence upon bis part, and bis administrator would not be entitled to recover.”

While tbe charge may be lacking in precise definition, nevertheless tbe case in all essential features involves a simple issue of fact. An examination of tbe charge in its entirety fails to produce tbe conclusion tbat there is reversible error warranting tbe overthrow of tbe judgment.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 51 (Thursday, March 16, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 14271]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6453]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[I.D. 030795A]


Marine Mammals

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Receipt of application for a scientific research permit 
(P773#54).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that Bradford E. Brown, Ph.D., of the 
National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Science Center, 
75 Virginia Beach Drive, Miami, FL 33149, has applied in due form for a 
permit to take Atlantic bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) for 
purposes of scientific research.
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before April 17, 1995.

ADDRESSES: The application and related documents are available for 
review upon written request or by appointment in the following offices:
    Permits Division, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, 1315 East-
West Highway, Room 13130, Silver Spring, MD 20910 (301/713-2289);
    Director, Southeast Region, NMFS, 9721 Executive Center Drive, N., 
St. Petersburg, FL 33702-2432 (813/893-3141).
    Written data or views, or requests for a public hearing on this 
request, should be submitted to the Chief, Permits Division, F/PR1, 
Office of Protected Resources, 1335 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, 
MD 20910, within 30 days of the publication of this notice. Those 
individuals requesting a hearing should set forth the specific reasons 
why a hearing on this particular request would be appropriate.
    Concurrent with the publication of this notice in the Federal 
Register, the Secretary of Commerce is forwarding copies of this 
application to the Marine Mammal Commission and its Committee of 
Scientific Advisors.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The subject permit is requested under the 
authority of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, as amended (16 
U.S.C. 1361 et seq.), and the Regulations Governing the Taking and 
Importing of Marine Mammals (50 CFR part 216).
    The applicant seeks authorization to take by harassment a maximum 
of 2,000 Atlantic bottlenose dolphins per year for the purpose of 
locating a maximum of 500 (over a 5-year period) dolphins suitable for 
take by capture for examination, sampling, marking, and release. The 
objectives of this study are to develop health assessment indices of 
dolphin populations and individuals in the southeast, and ultimately to 
assess the impact of human activities on specific populations.

    Dated: March 10, 1995.
Ann D. Terbush,
Chief, Permits & Documentation Division, National Marine Fisheries 
Service.
[FR Doc. 95-6453 Filed 3-15-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 30 (Tuesday, February 14, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 8442]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3827]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

``FEDERAL REGISTER'' CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: February 6, 
1995, 60 FR 7096.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF MEETING: February 8, 1995, 10:00 
a.m.

CHANGE IN THE MEETING: The following Docket Number has been added on 
the Agenda scheduled for February 8, 1995:

Item No., Docket No. and Company

CAH-2--P-10615-008, Wolverine Power Supply Corporation
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-3827 Filed 2-10-95; 3:57 pm]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 53 (Monday, March 20, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 14736]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6761]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Agricultural Advisory Committee Meeting

    This is to give notice, pursuant to Section 10(a) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 2, Section 10(a) and 41 CFR 101-
6.1015(b), that the Commodity Futures Trading Commission's Agricultural 
Advisory Committee will conduct a public meeting on April 3, 1995 from 
9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. in the lower-level hearing room of the 
Commodity Futures Trading Commission, 2033 K Street N.W., Washington, 
D.C. 20581. The agenda will consist of:

Agenda

I. Introductory Remarks, Commissioner Joseph B. Dial;
II. Summary of the 1994 Summit on Risk Management in American 
Agriculture;
III. 1995--The beginning of the new age of combining yield and price 
risk management for agricultural commodities.
    1. The Chicago Board of Trade's Area Yield Insurance Futures/
Options contract.
    2. Combining Multi-Peril Crop Insurance (MPCI) with replacement 
coverage, options, and forward contracts.
IV. The proposed merger of the CFTC and the SEC;
V. Updates on dual trading/audit trail;
VI. The change in delivery specifications for the CME live cattle 
contract effective June 1995;
VII. Other Committee Business; and
VIII. Closing Remarks by Commissioner Joseph B. Dial.

    The purpose of this meeting is to solicit the views of the 
Committee on the above-listed agenda matters. The Advisory Committee 
was created by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission for the purpose 
of receiving advice and recommendations on agricultural issues. The 
purposes and objectives of the Advisory Committee are more fully set 
forth in the fifth renewal charter of the Advisory Committee.
    The meeting is open to the public. The Chairman of the Advisory 
Committee, Commissioner Joseph B. Dial, is empowered to conduct the 
meeting in a fashion that will, in his judgment, facilitate the orderly 
conduct of business. Any member of the public who wishes to file a 
written statement with the Advisory Committee should mail a copy of the 
statement to the attention of: the Commodity Futures Trading Commission 
Agricultural Advisory Committee c/o Kimberly N. Griles, Commodity 
Futures Trading Commission, 2033 K Street N.W., Washington, D.C. 20581, 
before the meeting. Members of the public who wish to make oral 
statements should also inform Ms. Griles in writing at the foregoing 
address at least three business days before the meeting. Reasonable 
provision will be made, if time permits, for an oral presentation of no 
more than five minutes each in duration.

    Issued by the Commission in Washington, D.C. on March 15, 1995.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 95-6761 Filed 3-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Daniel A. Ramirez

,

Appellant

,

v.

First Liberty Insurance Corporation

,

Appellee. '

'

'

'

'

' No. 08

- 1 2

- 00 371

- CV

Appeal from the

327th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2011

- 295 )

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is Appellant’s motion to correct the clerk’s record. The Court

has reviewed the record and has determined that the pages of the Defendant’s Third Supplemental

No Evidence and Traditional Motion for Summary Judgment are not in the correct order. The

motion to correct the clerk’s record is therefore GRANTED. The District Clerk is ordered to file

a supplemental record with this Court on or before July 10, 2013

, containing the Defendant’s

Third Supplemental No Evidence and Traditional Motion for Summary Judgment, including any

attached evidence, with the pages of the document in the correct sequence.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 2 6 th day of June , 201 3

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera and Rodriguez, JJ.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2797

New Beverage Ventures:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 56 (Thursday, March 23, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15286]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7140]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Army Science Board; Notice of Open Meeting

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (P.L. 92-463), announcement is made of the following 
Committee Meeting:

    Name of Committee: Army Science Board (ASB).
    Date of Meeting: 25 April 1995.
    Time of Meeting: 0800-1200.
    Place: Fort Huachuca, AZ.
    Agenda: The Army Science Board's (ASB) Battle Lab Issue Group 
and the Summer Study on ``Technology Transfer from the Technology 
Base to the Customer'' will visit three Training and Doctrine 
Command (TRADOC) Battle Labs. This meeting will be open to the 
public. Any interested person may attend, appear before, or file 
statements with the committee at the time and in the manner 
permitted by the committee. The ASB Administrative Officer, Sally 
Warner, may be contacted for further information at (703) 695-0781.
Sally A. Warner,
Administrative Officer, Army Science Board.
[FR Doc. 95-7140 Filed 3-22-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3920

Helen of Troy:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
AFFIRMED; Opinion Filed May 12, 2014.

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 1 2
- 0 1081
- CR MONIQUE NESHAE ADLEY , Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal Distri ct Court No. 1 Dallas County, Texa s Trial Court Cause No. F 11
- 63320
- H



### MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Fillmore, Evans, and Lewis Opinion b y Justice Evans Monique Neshae Adley appeals her co nviction for aggravated robbery . In two issues, appellant contends the sentence imposed violat es her constitutional rights. We affirm the trial court’s judgment. Appellant pleaded guilty before a jury for aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon, a firearm. See T EX
. P ENAL C ODE A NN
. § 29.03(a)(2) (West 2011). After finding appellant guilty, the ju ry assessed punishme nt at seven years’ imprisonment. Appellant contends the seven - year sentence is grossly disproportionate to the offense and inappropriate to the offender, in violation of the United States and Texas Constitution s . Appellant asserts she participated in the robbery- 2

- because she was influenced by her male friends who had the firearm . She asserts that because she has two young children and a job awaiting her, she should have been granted probation. The State responds that appellant failed to preserve her complaint s for appellate review and alternatively, the sentence cannot be characterized as being gross ly disproportionate to the offense. Appellant did not complain about the sentence either at the time it was imposed or in a motion for new trial. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 33.1(a)(1); Castaneda v. State , 135 S.W.3d at 723. Thus, she has not preserved this issue for appellate review. Moreover, punishment that is assessed within the statutory range for an offense is neither excessive nor unconstit utionally cruel or unusual. Kirk v. State , 949 S.W.2d 769, 772 (Tex. App.

— Dallas 1997, pet. ref’d); see also Jackson v. State , 680 S.W.2d 809, 814 (Tex. Crim. App. 1984). Aggravated robbery is a first

- degree felony offense , punishable by imprisonment for five to ninety

- nine years or life and an optional fine not to exceed $10,000. See T EX
. P ENAL C ODE A NN
. § 12.32. Appellant’s seven year sentence is at the bottom end of the statutory range. We conclude the sentence does not violate either the United Sta tes or Texas Constitution. We overrule appellant’s two issue s . We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

/ David Evans/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE Do Not Publish T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47 121081F.U05- 3

- 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

JUDGMENT

MO NIQUE NESHAE ADLEY , Appellant No. 05

- 1 2

- 0 1081

- CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. F1 1

- 63320

- H). Opinion delivered by Justice Evans , Justices Fillmore and Lewis par ticipating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED

.

Judgment entered May 12, 2014.

/ David Evans/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE