alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS 

OFFP&J?..9{911~.~\.l~U ~ ~A TIO :.,.AUS:riN,.~AD_~1:16sTAGE))P1TNEYBOWES 

STATEOFTEXAS w.~... .. :t_ ~~·· IJ.IJ.~~W?' PENAL TV FOR · ·""'bJ:-,;;r-2?7'~ 'if. d ~..c::::::::::7~ ,{}7:;"'~ourw4 == 

!PRIVATE USIE dJ•·}.~, ·~"""·,;;; . ·\· . ZIP .

78701 ~ 1)11)'1()' GSl'775 

;j A,'"~ W a::1\ .f" . 02 1W '91 \W\W\Wof!:. 0 

;~"!If "'J~~~""~'· .:~ , ·. 0001401603 JUN. 03. 2015. 

6/3/2015 r;} 0 ~ 

RENO, PETER T. Tf,;€t. r:J6"::f3-25065+8 WR-83,321-02 

This Court is in receipt of appl'ica'nt:s .. "i\nOJ0fOt:fTO WITHDRAW APPLICATION 

3--\.. ~ -~,.,.,~,.n,;.r '<'- .,/';/ 

FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS'~,~l'his,moti0h has been granted. 

~-~ Abel Acosta, Clerk 

\. 

~~' ·iE8N3B 77002 ·
Place of Meetings
 Annual Meetings
 Special Meetings
 Notice of Meetings
 Quorum; Adjournments of Meetings
 Voting




---



##### 



Record Date
 Inspectors of Election
 Chairman of Meetings
 Secretary of Meetings
 Nominations of Directors.
 2




---



##### 



Number of Directors.
 Classified Board
 Changes in Number
 Vacancies
 First Meeting
 Regular Meetings
 3




---



##### 



Special Meetings
 Place of Conference Call Meeting
 Organization
 Quorum; Vote
 Removal of Directors
 Compensation.
 Resignations
 4




---



##### 



Committees
     5




---



##### 



General
 Term of Office; Removal and Vacancy
 Powers and Duties
 Power to Vote Stock
 
 Certificates of Stock
 Transfer of Stock
 6




---



##### 



Ownership of Stock
 
 Indemnification
 Expenses
 Nonexclusivity
 Amendment
 7




---



##### 



No Inconsistent Action
 Indemnification Agreement
 Unenforceability
 Definition
 
 Corporate Seal
 Fiscal Year
 8
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 57 (Friday, March 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15557-15558]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7253]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-152-001]


NorAm Gas Transmission Co.; Notice of Filing

March 20, 1995.
    Take notice that on March 14, 1995, NorAm Gas Transmission Company 
(NGT) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Fourth 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets to become effective 
March 4, 1995:

Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 168
Substitute Original Sheet No. 168A

    NGT states that it is modifying the definitions of the General 
Terms and Conditions in compliance with the Commission's March 3, 1995 
Order in this matter.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol 
Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rule 211 of 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211). All 
such motions or protests should be filed on or before March 27, 1995. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are [[Page 15558]] available for public inspection in 
the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-7253 Filed 3-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Order entered March 21 , 2013

In The



## Court of Appeals

**Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 12

- 00853

- CR

DERWIN DWIGHT MOORE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 195th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Co urt Cause No. F11

- 26009

- N



### O RDER

The Court REINSTATE S the appeal.

On February 15, 2013, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why

appellant’s brief ha d not been filed. On March 19, 2013, we received appellant’s brief, together

with an e xtension motion. Therefore, in the interest of expediting the appeal, we VACATE t he

February 15, 2013 order requiring findings.

We GRANT the March 19, 2013 extension motion and ORDER appellant’s brief filed as

of the date of this order.

/s/ DAVID EVANS

JUSTICE
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00361-CR

Anthony Barber

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 297th District Court

of Tarrant Coun ty (1407138R)

March 23, 2017

Opinion by Justice Kerr

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the tria l court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _/s/ Elizabeth Ke rr__________________

Justice Elizabeth Kerr
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 56 (Thursday, March 23, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15300-15301]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7151]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
ES-960-1420-00; ES-047172, Group 152, Wisconsin


Filing of Plat of Survey; Wisconsin

    The plat of the survey of an island in the Milwaukee River, in 
section 12, Township 11 North, Range 20 East, Fourth Principal 
Meridian, Wisconsin, will be officially filed in Eastern States, 
Springfield, Virginia at 7:30 a.m., on May 1, 1995.
    The survey was requested by the District Manager, Milwaukee 
District Office, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
    All inquiries or protests concerning the technical aspects of the 
survey must be sent to the Chief Cadastral Surveyor, Eastern States, 
Bureau of Land Management, 7450 Boston Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 
22153, prior to 7:30 a.m. May 1, 1995. [[Page 15301]] 
    Copies of the plat will be made available upon request and 
prepayment of the reproduction fee of $2.75 per copy.

    Dated: March 14, 1995.
Stephen G. Kopach,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor.
[FR Doc. 95-7151 Filed 3-22-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 50 (Wednesday, March 15, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 14057]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6577]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OVERSEAS PRIVATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION


Board of Directors Meeting

time and date: Tuesday, March 28, 1:00 p.m. (Open Portion), 1:30 p.m. 
(Closed Portion).

place: Offices of the Corporation, Twelfth Floor Board Room, 1100 New 
York Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C.

status: Meeting Open to the Public from 1:00 p.m. to 1:30 p.m. Closed 
portion will commence at 1:30 p.m. (approx.)

matters to be considered:

    1. President's Report
    2. Approval of 12/06/94 Minutes (Open Portion)
    3. Meeting schedule through September 1995

further matters to be considered: (Closed to the Public 1:30 p.m.).

    1. Insurance Project in Kyrgyzstan
    2. Insurance Project in the Philippines
    3. Insurance Project in the Philippines
    4. Finance Project in Argentina
    5. Finance Project in Jamaica
    6. Insurance Project in Argentina
    7. Finance Project in South America
    8. Pending Major Projects
    9. Approval of the 12/06/94 Minutes (Closed Portion)

contact person for information: Information on the meeting may be 
obtained from Jane Chalmers at (202) 336-8421.

    Dated: March 13, 1995.
Jane H. Chalmers,
Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 95-6577 Filed 3-13-95; 3:55 pm]
BILLING CODE 3210-01-M
Exhibit 23




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM




We consent to the
incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos.
333-153421, 333-60114 and 333-117231) relating to the 2000 Stock Option and
Incentive Plan of Shoe Carnival, Inc., the Registration Statements on Form S-8
(Nos. 33-74050 and 333-44047) relating to the 1993 Stock Option and Incentive
Plan of Shoe Carnival, Inc., the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No.
33-80979) relating to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Shoe Carnival, Inc.,
and the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-82819 and No. 35-1736614)
relating to the Outside Directors Stock Option Plan of Shoe Carnival, Inc. and
subsidiaries of our reports dated April 15, 2010, relating to the consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedule of Shoe Carnival, Inc.,
and the effectiveness of Shoe Carnival Inc.’s internal control over financial
reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Shoe Carnival, Inc.
for the year ended January 30, 2010.




/s/ Deloitte &
Touche LLP




Indianapolis,
IndianaApril 15, 2010




---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                     TWEETER HOME ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                     906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tweeter Home Entertainment Group,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Joseph G. McGuire, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition of the Company as of June 30, 2005 and results
of operations of the Company for the three months ended June 30, 2005.

                                         /s/ Joseph G. McGuire
                                         -------------------------------------
                                         Joseph G. McGuire
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer

                                         August 9, 2005
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4040

Enerpac:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 8 (Thursday, January 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 2959]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-723]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP95-131-000]


Colorado Interstate Gas Co.; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

January 6, 1995.
    Take notice that on December 22, 1994, Colorado Interstate Gas 
Company (CIG), P.O. Box 1087, Colorado Springs, Colorado 80944, filed 
in Docket No. CP95-131-000 a request pursuant to Section 157.205 of the 
Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) for 
authorization to construct a new delivery facility located in Albany 
County, Wyoming, under CIG's blanket certificate issued in Docket No. 
CP83-21-000 pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, all as more 
fully set forth in the request which is on file with the Commission and 
open to public inspection.
    CIG states that the facility would consist of a 2-inch tap, meter 
run and facilities appurtenant thereto for the delivery of gas to 
Walden Capital Leasing Corporation for use by the municipal customers 
of the Town of Walden, Colorado.
    CIG states further that it has been advised that the maximum daily 
volume would be approximately 750 Mcf with an estimated annual 
requirement of 100,000 Mcf. It is said that the estimated cost of the 
delivery facilities is $47,400 for which CIG would be reimbursed.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-723 Filed 1-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 10.27

 

FIRST AMENDMENT

TO THE

ESCO CORPORATION

EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN

 

The ESCO Corporation Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the “Plan”), as amended and restated effective June 1, 2011, is amended, effective June 1, 2011, pursuant to Section 12.1 of the Plan, as follows:

 

1.                                       Section 1.18 Eligible Employee is amended by replacing clause (f) thereunder, in its entirety, with the following:

 

(f)                                    non-resident aliens, as defined in Section 7701(b)(1)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended and determined without regard to any U.S. income tax treaty.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, ESCO Corporation has caused this First Amendment to be executed on this 27th day of June, 2011.

 

	
 
    	
ESCO   Corporation
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
/s/   NICK BLAUWIEKEL
    
	
 
    	
Nick   Blauwiekel
    
	
 
    	
Vice   President – Human Resources
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT



We  consent  to  the  incorporation  by  reference  in  ValueStar  Corporation's
Registration  Statement No. 333-66195 on Form S-3, and in Registration Statement
No. 333-66191 on Form S-8, of our report, dated August 9, 1999, on our audits of
the consolidated  financial  statements of ValueStar  Corporation as of June 30,
1999 and for each of the two years ended June 30,  1999,  which is  appearing in
the Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB of  ValueStar  Corporation  for the year ended
June 30, 1999.


                                                   /s/ MOSS ADAMS LLP


Santa Rosa, California
September 20, 1999
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 56 (Thursday, March 23, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15305]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7171]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993, Unixware Technology Group Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on July 19, 1994, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. Sec. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), UnixWare Technology Group 
Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney 
General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities 
of the parties and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of the antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the 
Act, the identities of the parties are: AT&T/GIS, West Columbia, SC; 
Amdahl Corporation, Sunnyvale, CA; Chorus Systems, Beaverton, OR; 
Fujitsu Limited, Kawasaki, JAPAN; Hewlett-Packard, Ft. Collins, CO; 
ICL, Berks, Bracknell, GREAT BRITAIN; Locus Computing, Inglewood, CA; 
Microport, Scotts Valley, CA; MITSUBISHI/apricot, Kamakura, JAPAN; NEC 
Systems Laboratory, Inc., Princeton, NJ; Novell, Inc., San Jose, CA; 
Olivetti S.p.A., Ivera, ITALY; Sony Corporation, Kanaqwa, JAPAN; 
Stratus Computer, Inc., San Jose, GREAT BRITAIN; and Unisys 
Corporation, Blue Bell, PA.
    The nature and objectives of UTG are to engage in research and 
development related to the improvement of the UNIX operating system, 
and to promote and encourage the availability of a variety of ``open'' 
and compatible UNIX based products and systems which meet the many and 
varied needs of the end users of those systems.
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 95-7171 Filed 3-22-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
```
`

NUMBER 13

- 13

- 00251

- CV



### COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

IN RE THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY

AND GOODYEAR

- DUNLOP TIRES NORTH AMERICA, LTD.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

On May 13, 2013, relators , the Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company and

Goodyear

- Dunlop Tires North America, Ltd., filed a petition for writ of mandamus

contending that the Honorable Jack Marr, presiding judge of the 24th Judicial District

Court of Calhoun County, Texas, abused his di scretion, leaving relators without an

adequate appellate remedy, by rendering certain discovery orders on March 28, 2013.

Relators also filed a motion for temporary relief in which they ask ed this Court to impose

a stay on the underlying proceedings until such time as we may fully consider the2

petition for writ of mandamus. On May 14, 2013, w e granted relator s ’ motion for

temporary relief and ordere d the real parties in interest to file any response to the

petition for writ of mandamus. Responses were fi led on May 29 and May 30, 2013.

Having reviewed relator s ’ petition for writ of mandamus, the responses filed

thereto, and the record documents provided by the parties, this Court is of the opinion

that relator s ha ve not shown themselves entitled to the relief sought. Acco rdingly, we

hereby DENY relator s ’ petition for writ of mandamus and LIFT the previously

- imposed

stay on trial court proceedings.

PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed the

2 6 th day of July , 201 3

.
#### Joseph A. Gallagher, Jr., Appellant-Respondent, v Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc., Respondent-Appellant.

In an action, *inter alia,*to recover damages for negligence and intentional infliction of emotional distress, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Wood, J.), dated December 1, 1988, as granted that branch of the defendant’s motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s second through fifth causes of action, and the defendant cross-appeals from so much of the same order as denied that branch of its motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s first cause of action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed and cross-appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

On September 6, 1979, Tropical Storm David caused Consolidated Edison customers in Westchester County, including the plaintiff, to lose electrical power. Power to the plaintiff’s house was not restored until three days after the storm. In March 1981, the plaintiff commenced participation in Consolidated Edison’s so-called "level billing plan” and the parties eventually became involved in a billing dispute over the amount owed.

The plaintiff’s first cause of action asserted that the defendant breached the "level billing plan” contract by threatening to terminate electrical and gas service. We find that an issue of fact exists with respect to whether certain payments were made under the contract. Accordingly, the plaintiff’s first cause of action to recover damages for breach of contract was properly sustained.

*658The plaintiff’s second and third causes of action alleged gross negligence by the defendant based upon the loss of service after the tropical storm and a failure to restore service within a reasonable period of time. We agree with the Supreme Court that the plaintiff failed to provide sufficient evidence in admissible form to overcome the defendant’s showing that it had acted in a reasonable and nonnegligent manner.

The fourth and fifth causes of action alleged that the defendant intentionally inflicted emotional distress upon the plaintiff through letters threatening termination of his electrical service. The tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress predicates liability "on the basis of extreme and outrageous conduct, which so transcends the bounds of decency as to be regarded as atrocious and intolerable in a civilized society” *(Freihoffer v Hearst Corp.,*65 NY2d 135, 143). Clearly, the facts alleged here do not meet this standard and summary judgment was warranted in the absence of any supporting proof *(see, Freihoffer v Hearst Corp., supra; Fischer v Maloney,*43 NY2d 553). Mangano, P. J., Kunzeman, Rubin and Balletta, JJ., concur.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2582

JAE Electronics, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn