alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 56 (Thursday, March 23, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15308-15309]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7170]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Lodging of Consent Decree Under the Clean Air Act

    In accordance with the policy of the Department of Justice, 28 CFR 
Sec. 50.7, notice is hereby given that on March 15, 1995, a proposed 
Consent Decree in United States v. California Almond Growers Exchange 
d/b/a Blue Diamond Growers, Civil Action No. CIV-S-95-475-LKK-GGH, was 
lodged with the United States District Court for the Eastern District 
of California. That action was brought pursuant to the Clean Air Act 
for Blue Diamond's failure to obtain a new source review permit and a 
Prevention of Significant Deterioration permit prior to construction of 
a facility in Sacramento, California, and operation of that facility 
without the permits and in non-compliance with the Clean Air Act. 
Pursuant to the Consent Decree, Blue Diamond must either obtain permits 
for its facility and comply with emissions limits in the consent decree 
and any permit that is issued, replace the facility in its entirety and 
comply with the Clean Air Act, or shut the facility down. In addition, 
Blue Diamond will pay an initial civil penalty of $437,000, and an 
additional $238,000 penalty if it does not shut down the facility.
    As provided in 28 CFR 50.7, the Department of Justice will receive 
comments from persons who are not named as parties to this action 
relating to the proposed Consent Decree for a period of thirty days 
from the date of this publication. Comments should be addressed to the 
Assistant Attorney General of the Environment and Natural Resources 
Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530. All 
[[Page 15309]] comments should refer to United States v. California 
Almond Growers Exchange d/b/a Blue Diamond Growers, D.J. Ref. 90-5-2-1-
1679.
    The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the office of the 
United States Attorney, 650 Capital Mall, Sacramento, California; the 
Region IX office of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 75 
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California 94105, and at the Consent 
Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005, 
(202) 624-0892. A copy of the proposed Consent Decree may be obtained 
in person or by mail from the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, 
N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005. In requesting a copy, please 
enclose a check in the amount of $6.50 for a copy of the consent decree 
(25 cents per page reproduction costs) payable to ``Consent Decree 
Library.''
Joel M. Gross,
Acting Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 95-7170 Filed 3-22-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MARCH 7, 2019

NO. 03-18-00775-CR

Ex parte Raul Alvarez

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 9 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAKER, AND TRIANA

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the order denying the application for writ of habeas corpus signed by the 

trial court. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there 

was no reversible error in the order. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s order denying 

the application for writ of habeas corpus. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, 

no adjudication of costs is made.
<PAGE>

                                    TERM NOTE

$25,000,000                                              September 25, 1996
                                                         Chicago, Illinois

         FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned promises to pay to the order of
HARRIS TRUST AND SAVINGS BANK, at the principal office of Harris Trust and
Savings Bank (the "Agent"), in Chicago, Illinois, TWENTY-FIVE MILLION DOLLARS
($25,000,000), such amount to be paid at the times set forth in the Credit
Agreement referred to below.

         The undersigned further promises to pay interest on the unpaid
principal amount of the Term Loan evidenced hereby from the date of such Term
Loan until such Term Loan is paid in full, payable at the rates and at the times
set forth in the Credit Agreement. Payments of both principal and interest are
to be made in lawful money of the United States of America.

         This Note evidences indebtedness incurred under, and is subject to the
terms and provisions of, the Credit Agreement dated as of September 25, 1996
(herein, as amended or otherwise modified from time to time, called the "Credit
Agreement") between the undersigned, certain financial institutions (including
the payee) and the Agent, to which Credit Agreement reference is hereby made for
a statement of the terms and provisions under which this Note may or must be
paid prior to its due date or may have its due date accelerated.

         In addition to and not in limitation of the foregoing and the
provisions of the Credit Agreement, the undersigned further agrees, subject only
to any limitation imposed by applicable law, to pay all reasonable expenses,
including reasonable attorneys' fees and legal expenses, incurred by the holder
of this Note in endeavoring to collect any amounts payable hereunder which are
not paid when due, whether by acceleration or otherwise.

         This Note is made under and governed by the internal laws of the State
of Illinois.

                                              GIBRALTAR PACKAGING GROUP, INC.


                                              By  /s/ W E Rose
                                              Title  President
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-3865

HoMedics USA LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4265 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4265

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase and provide an 
inflation adjustment for the limitation on distributions from qualified 
tuition programs that may be used for elementary and secondary tuition.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 May 19 (legislative day, May 17), 2022

  Mr. Kennedy introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase and provide an 
inflation adjustment for the limitation on distributions from qualified 
tuition programs that may be used for elementary and secondary tuition.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Inflation-Adjusted Education 
Investment Act''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE ON LIMITATION ON EXPENSES USED FOR ELEMENTARY AND 
              SECONDARY TUITION.

    (a) In General.--The last sentence of section 529(e)(3)(A) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``$10,000'' and 
inserting ``$12,000''.
    (b) Inflation Adjustment.--Section 529(e)(3) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subparagraph:
                    ``(C) Inflation adjustment.--
                            ``(i) In general.--In the case of any 
                        taxable year beginning in a calendar year after 
                        2022, the $12,000 amount in subparagraph (A) 
                        shall be increased by an amount equal to--
                                    ``(I) such dollar amount, 
                                multiplied by
                                    ``(II) the cost-of-living 
                                adjustment determined under section 
                                1(f)(3) for the calendar year in which 
                                the taxable year begins, determined by 
                                substituting `calendar year 2021' for 
                                `calendar year 2016' in subparagraph 
                                (A)(ii) thereof.
                            ``(ii) Rounding.--Any increase determined 
                        under clause (i) shall be rounded to the 
                        nearest multiple of $500.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2021.
                                 <all>
```
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2724

Price Pump Company:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
Amendment to the Letter Agreement



 Exhibit 10.7 
 AMENDMENT TO LETTER AGREEMENT 
 THIS AMENDMENT TO LETTER AGREEMENT
(“Amendment”) dated as of June 29, 2011, by and between MANITEX INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Michigan corporation (“Company”) and Comerica Bank (“Bank”). 

RECITALS: 
 A.
Company and Bank entered into a Letter Agreement dated as of May 5, 2010 (“Agreement”). 
 B. Company and Bank
desire to amend the Agreement, as hereinafter set forth. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: 

1. The reference to “Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000)” in the first paragraph of the Agreement is deleted and replaced
with “One Million Dollars ($1,000,000).” 
 2. Company hereby represents and warrants that, after giving effect to the
amendment contained herein, (a) execution, delivery and performance of this Amendment and any other documents and instruments required under this Amendment or the Agreement are within Company’s limited liability company powers, have been
duly authorized, are not in contravention of law or the terms of Company’s Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws, and do not require the consent or approval of any governmental body, agency, or authority; and this Amendment and any other
documents and instruments required under this Amendment or the Agreement, will be valid, binding and enforceable in accordance with their terms; and (b) no event of default or condition or event which, with the giving of notice or the running
of time, or both, would constitute an event of default under the Agreement has occurred and is continuing as of the date hereof. 
 3. Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement, unless otherwise defined herein. 

4. Company is responsible for all costs incurred by Bank, including without limit reasonable attorneys’ fees, with regard to the
preparation and execution of this Amendment and any documents, instruments or agreements executed in connection herewith. 
 5.
Except as may be expressly provided herein, the execution of this Amendment shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any event of default or default. 
 6. Except as expressly amended herein, all of the terms and conditions of the Agreement remain unchanged and in full force and effect and the Agreement is ratified, confirmed and restated. 

7. This Amendment shall be effective upon execution hereof by Company and Bank. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment as of the date set forth
above. 
  

									
	MANITEX INTERNATIONAL, INC.	 		 	COMERICA BANK
					
	By:	 	 /s/ David H. Gransee
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ James Q. Goudie

	Its:	 	 VP & CFO
	 		 	Its:	 	 VP & AGM



  
 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1322

PAMELA PELZER, Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus
SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY; SOUTH CAROLINA HOUSING AUTHORITY; WORKER COMPENSATION; BANK OF AMERICA; FAMILY SERVICE; SOLOMAN SMITH BARNEY; UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE; LEGAL AID, Greenville, South Carolina; CITY HALL - POLICE DEPARTMENT; MERRILL LYNCH INVESTMENT FIRM; COLLETON COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT; US GRANT, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Sol Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-03-4035-2-08) Submitted: April 29, 2004 Decided: May 5, 2004 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Pamela Pelzer, Appellant Pro Se.- 2 - Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 3 - PER CURIAM: Pamela Pelzer appeals from the district court’s order dismissing her civil action. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2000). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Pelzer that failure to timely file objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Pelzer failed to object to the magistrate judge’s recommendation. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned that failure to object will waive appellate review. See Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845

! 46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Pelzer has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 13, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3807

Knowles Corporation:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests and the 

request failed to show that this particular product is available only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

                    The National Science Board, pursuant to NSF regulations (45 CFR part 614), the National Science Foundation Act, as amended, (42 U.S.C. 1862n-5), and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice of the addition of an agenda item in the plenary closed session of the National Science Board meetings on February 3, 2016, as shown below. The original notice appeared in the                     **Federal Register**                     on January 29, 2016 at 81 FR 70259.                

## Amended Agenda

### Plenary Board meeting

#### Closed session: 12:30-1:00 p.m.

NSB Chair's remarks

Approval of closed plenary minutes for November 2015

Approval of Stampede 2 preliminary resolution

Approval of Gemini preliminary resolution

Discussion and approval of Board's next steps regarding NEON (ADDED)

Closed committee reports

NSB Chair's closing remarks

# UPDATES:

                         Please refer to the National Science Board Web site for additional information. Meeting information and schedule updates (time, place, subject matter or status of meeting) may be found at                         *http://www.nsf.gov/​nsb/​meetings/​notices.jsp.*

# AGENCY CONTACT:

                         Ron Campbell,                         *jrcampbe@nsf.gov,*                         703-292-7000.                    

Kyscha Slater-Williams,

Program Specialist, National Science Board.

[FR Doc. 2016-02362 Filed 2-3-16; 11:15 am]

 BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THIS
STATEMENT  OF  OPERATIONS  DATED  SEPTEMBER  30,  1997 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-KSB.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000882362
<NAME>                        PARACELSIAN, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                 1 
<CURRENCY>                               USD
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                          YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                   OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                     SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                           1
<CASH>                                              886,249
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             0
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                         156,323
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1,274,009
<PP&E>                                              731,888
<DEPRECIATION>                                      426,809
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    2,708,771
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               467,923
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                            120,045
<OTHER-SE>                                        2,120,803
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      2,708,771
<SALES>                                               1,246
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      6,146
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  4,147,169
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (3,941,749)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (3,941,749)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          (.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (.33)
        

</TABLE>