alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE v. DAVID STEPHENSON

(Filed 20 November, 1957)

Appeal by defendant from *Fountain, Special Judge,*August Term, 1957, of Harnett.

Defendant was, at the November Term 1955 of the Superior Court of Harnett County, placed on trial on a bill of indictment charging him with breaking and entering. The bill signed by the foreman of the grand jury with the name of the witness examined checked was returned into court reading: “Those marked X sworn by the undersigned foreman, and examined before the Grand Jury, and this bill found-A True Bill.” Defendant pleaded not guilty. The jury returned a verdict of *233guilty, prison sentence of five to seven years was imposed and suspended and defendant placed on probation for.a term of five years with a special provision “that defendant not possess or drink any alcoholic beverages of any kind during the period of probation.”

At the August Term 1957 defendant entered a plea of guilty to a charge of public drunkenness on 1 July 1956.

On motion to put the suspended sentence into effect a hearing was had. Judge Fountain found a wilful violation of the terms of probation including, *inter alia,*public drunkenness in accord with defendant’s plea. He ordered the suspended sentence into effect. Defendant appealed.

*Attorney General Patton and Assistant Attorney General Moody for the State.*

*E. R. Temple for defendant appellant.*

Per Curiam.

No right of appeal is given. G.S. 15-180; *S. v. Tripp,*168 N.C. 150, 83 S.E. 630; *S. v. Miller,*225 N.C. 213, 34 S.E. 2d 143; *S. v. Thomas,*236 N.C. 196, 72 S.E. 2d 525. No error appears on the record. G.S. 15-141. *S. v. Harrison,*104 N.C. 728.

The motion of the Attorney General to dismiss is allowed.

Appeal dismissed.
CERTIFICATIONS

I, Oliver G. Brewer, certify that:
1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Adams Golf, Inc.;
2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4.      The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and
have:
       a)    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
       b)    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of
the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and 
       c)    disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting; and
5.      The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
       a)    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
       b)    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

|Date:  November 7, 2006 |  | By:/S/ OLIVER G. BREWER III          
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|                        |  | Oliver G. Brewer, III                
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer and President
<PAGE>




                                                                     Exhibit 11
                           PAYLESS SHOESOURCE, INC.
                           ------------------------
                     COMPUTATION OF NET EARNINGS PER SHARE
                     -------------------------------------


                                    13 Weeks Ended          39 Weeks Ended
                                  -------------------    --------------------
                                  Oct. 31,    Nov. 1,    Oct. 31,    Nov. 1,
(Thousands, except per share)       1998       1997        1998       1997   
                                  --------   --------    --------    --------
Basic Computation:
------------------

Net earnings                      $ 33,688   $ 33,493    $120,747   $111,508

Weighted average common
 shares outstanding                 34,377     37,473      36,060     38,816
                                  --------   --------    --------   --------

Basic earnings per share          $   0.98   $   0.89    $   3.35   $   2.87
                                  ========   ========    ========   ========


Diluted Computation:
--------------------

Net earnings                      $ 33,688   $ 33,493    $120,747   $111,508

Weighted average common
 shares outstanding                 34,377     37,473      36,060     38,816

Net effect of dilutive stock
  options based on the treasury
  stock method                         111        661         372        396
                                  --------   --------    --------   --------
Outstanding shares for diluted
  earnings per share                34,488     38,134      36,432     39,212
                                  ========   ========    ========   ========

Diluted earnings per share        $   0.98   $   0.88    $   3.31   $   2.84
                                  ========   ========    ========   ========


Note: Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net earnings by
the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during
the period.  Diluted earnings per share includes the effect of conversions
of options.






<PAGE>
**EXHIBIT
      32**





**CERTIFICATIONS**





Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection
      Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted), Anna E. Gluskin, Chief Executive
      Officer and President of Generex Biotechnology Corporation (the "Company"),
      and
      Rose C. Perri, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies
      that, to the best of her knowledge:





1.  The
      Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2008,
      and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the "Report") fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end
      of
      the period covered by the Report.




DATE:
                  March 11, 2008
              By:
                  /s/ Anna E. GluskinAnna
                  E. Gluskin, Chief Executive Officer(Principal
                  Executive Officer)
   DATE:
                  March 11, 2008
              By:
                  /s/ Rose C. PerriRose
                  C. Perri, Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial
                  and
                  Accounting Officer)
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2605

Price Pump Company:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       3,332,012
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,936,230
<PP&E>                                       2,166,873
<DEPRECIATION>                                 254,760
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,920,943
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,947,581
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,222
<COMMON>                                         5,972
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,966,168
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,920,943
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,218,361
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,711,034
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,687
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,334,647)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,334,647)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,334,647)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.42)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 56 (Thursday, March 23, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15304]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7128]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION

[Ex Parte No. 290 (Sub No. 5) (95-2)]


Quarterly Rail Cost Adjustment Factor

AGENCY: Interstate Commerce Commission.

ACTION: Approval of rail cost adjustment factor and decision.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission has approved a second quarter 1995 rail cost 
adjustment factor (RCAF) and cost index filed by the Association of 
American Railroads. The second quarter RCAF (Unadjusted) is 1.070. The 
second quarter RCAF (Adjusted) is 0.820, a decrease of 0.2% from the 
first quarter 1995 RCAF (Adjusted). Maximum second quarter 1995 RCAF 
rate levels may not exceed 99.8% of maximum first quarter 1995 rate 
levels.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 1, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert C. Hasek, (202) 927-6239 or H. 
Jeff Warren, (202) 927-6243. TDD for the hearing impaired: (202) 927-
5721.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information is contained in the 
Commission's decision. To purchase a copy of the full decision write 
to, call, or pick up in person from: Dynamic Concepts, Inc., Room 2229, 
Interstate Commerce Commission Building, 1201 Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20423, or telephone (202) 289-4357/4359. (Assistance for 
the hearing impaired is available through TDD services (202) 927-5721.)
    This action will not significantly affect either the quality of the 
human environment or energy conservation.
    Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), we conclude that our action will not 
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

    Decided: March 16, 1995.

    By the Commission, Chairman McDonald, Vice Chairman Morgan, and 
Commissioners Simmons and Owen.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-7128 Filed 3-22-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7035-01-P
A. BROWN 

CLE iÁ F UPREME COURT 

BY 

DE CLERX 

CLERK OF THE SUPREME CO RT 

ELIZAB B W 

BY: 

Ill) 1947 C,s15. 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

No. 84796 

FILE 

SEP 9 2022 

GLENEAGLES HOMEOWNERS 

ASSOCIATION, A NEVADA NONPROFIT CORPORATION, 

Petitioner, 

vs. 

THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF 

CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE TARA 

D. CLARK NEWBERRY, DISTRICT 

JUDGE, 

Respondents, 

and 

SATICOY BAY LLC SERIES 3844 BLUE 

GULL, A NEVADA LIMITED 

LIABILITY COMPANY; AND NEVADA 

ASSOCIATION SERVICES, INC., 

Real Parties in Interest. 

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION 

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and cause appearing, 

this matter is dismissed. The parties shall bear their own costs and 

attorney fees. NRAP 42(b). 

It is so ORDERED. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

CLERK'S ORDER 

2_2- -Lez:71 
cc: Hon. Tara D. Clark Newberry, District Judge 

Lipson Neilson P.C. 

Brandon E. Wood 

Roger P. Croteau & Associates, Ltd. 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

CLERK'S ORDER 

(01 1947
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                          0001059366
<NAME>                         NBG Radio Network, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                   1
<CURRENCY>                     USD

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               NOV-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  DEC-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    MAY-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                           1
<CASH>                                                 480,948
<SECURITIES>                                           468,750
<RECEIVABLES>                                        3,707,896
<ALLOWANCES>                                             1,200
<INVENTORY>                                             27,724
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     6,585,930
<PP&E>                                                 344,460
<DEPRECIATION>                                         134,537
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       8,241,266
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                2,090,079
<BONDS>                                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                             6,753,072
<OTHER-SE>                                             (81,159)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         8,241,266
<SALES>                                              3,456,857
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     3,456,889
<CGS>                                                1,129,974
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        1,287,531
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         857
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      1,038,527
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          0
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                         1,038,527
<EPS-BASIC>                                                .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              .07



</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Next Generation Technology Holdings,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report").
I, Carl Pahapill, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

September 12, 2003                             BY:  /S/ DONALD C. SCMITT
                                               ------------------------------
                                               NAME: Donald C. Scmitt
                                               TITLE: CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



<PAGE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-2086

GHL International, Inc: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
UNITED STATES NAVY–MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

_________________________

No. 201700143

_________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v.

AARON Z. BUCHANAN

Sonar Technician (Surface) Seaman Recruit (E-1), 

U.S. Navy

Appellant

_________________________

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Captain Paul C. LeBlanc, JAGC, USN.

Convening Authority: Commanding Officer, Training Support 

Center, San Diego, CA.

Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation: Lieutenant Stacy E. 

Saxon, JAGC, USN.

For Appellant: Captain Kimberly D. Hinson, JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________

Decided 15 August 2017

_________________________

Before HUTCHISON, FULTON, and ELLINGTON, Appellate Military 

Judges

_________________________

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening 

authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c). 

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Shoe Carnival, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending January 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I W. Kerry Jackson, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date:  April 14, 2004 | By:  /s/ W. Kerry JacksonW. Kerry Jackson
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
|--------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





---