alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-10-00067-CV

Juan MORENO,

Appellant

v.

Estela BECERRA,

Appellee

From the County Court, Maverick County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2786

Honorable Jose A. Aranda, Jr., Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 17, 2010

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

The trial court signed a final judgment on December 15, 2009. Pursuant to Texas Rule of

Appellate Procedure 26.1, appellant’s notice of appeal was due on January 14, 2010. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 26.1. Appellant, however, filed his notice of appeal fifteen days later — on January 29,

2010. Appellant’s notice of appeal was not accompanied by a motion for extension of time to file

the notice of appeal. 
04-10-00067-CV

-2-

A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good faith,

files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by Rule 26.1 but within the fifteen-day grace period

provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d

615, 617 (Tex. 1997) (construing the predecessor to Rule 26). However, the appellant must offer

a reasonable explanation for failing to file the notice of appeal in a timely manner. See id.; TEX. R.

APP. P. 26.3, 10.5. 

On February 4, 2010, this Court notified appellant of the need for an explanation for his

failure to file the notice of appeal in a timely manner. We warned appellant that failing to provide

a reasonable explanation would result in the dismissal of his appeal for want of jurisdiction. To date,

no response has been received from appellant. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of

jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 52 (Friday, March 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14430-14431]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6585]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Project No. 2306-016]


Citizens Utilities Co.; Notice of Amendment To Application

March 13, 1995.
    On February 9, 1995, Citizens Utilities (Applicant) filed an 
application to amend its application for new license for the Clyde 
River Project, FERC No. 2306-016.
    The Applicant is proposing to (1) remove the Newport No. 11 dam and 
[[Page 14431]] buttress wall, (2) permanently stabilize the Newport No. 
11 right abutment embankment, and (3) repower the No. 11 powerhouse 
through construction of an eight-foot-diameter pipe and draft tube 
extension from Project No. 2306's upstream Newport Nos. 1, 2, 3, 
powerhouse.
    The project as originally proposed, and the project with dam No. 11 
removed, have been addressed in the Draft Environmental Impact 
Statement for the Clyde River Project issued February 17, 1995. 
However, we were not aware when that document was issued that the 
Applicant was preparing to amend its application. Thus, we are 
providing an opportunity for additional interventions and for entities 
to reconsider their terms, conditions, prescriptions and comments 
submitted previously with respect to this application. Comments and/or 
petitions for intervention will be due 30 days from the date of 
issuance of this notice with response comments due 45 days from the 
date of issuance.
    Copies of the application and amendment are available for 
inspection and reproduction at the Commission's Public Reference and 
Files Maintenance Branch located at 941 North Capitol Street, NE., Room 
3104, Washington, DC 20426 or by calling (202) 208-1371. A copy is also 
available for inspection and reproduction at Citizens Utilities 
Company, Citizens Road, Newport, VT 05855, or by calling (802) 334-
6539. The applicant contact for this project is Mr. Frank W. Thomas.
    Contact Ms. Kathleen Sherman at (202) 219-2834 for questions 
relating to this proceeding.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-6585 Filed 3-16-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 52 (Friday, March 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 14440]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6568]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Library of Medicine; Notice of Meeting of the Board of 
Scientific Counselors, National Center for Biotechnology Information, 
National Library of Medicine

    Pursuant to Pub. L. 92-463, notice is hereby given of the meeting 
of the Board of Scientific Counselors, National Center for 
Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, on April 20-
21, 1995.
    The meeting of April 21 will be open to the public from 9 a.m. to 3 
p.m. in the Board Room of the Library, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, 
Maryland, for the review of research and development programs and 
preparation of reports of the National Center for Biotechnology 
Information. Attendance by the public will be limited to space 
available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, 
such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, should contact Dr. David Lipman at 301-496-2475.
    In accordance with provisions set forth in sec. 552b(c)(6), Title 
5, U.S.C., and sec. 10(d) of Pub. L. 92-463, the meeting will be closed 
to the public on April 20 from 7 p.m. to approximately 10 p.m., at the 
Bethesda Hyatt Hotel, and on April 21, from 3 p.m. to approximately 5 
p.m., in the Board Room of the National Library of Medicine, for the 
consideration of personnel qualifications and performance of individual 
investigators and similar items, the disclosure of which would 
constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    The Executive Secretary, Dr. David J. Lipman, Director, National 
Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, 
8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, Maryland 20894, telephone (301) 496-
2475, will furnish summaries of the meeting, rosters of committee 
members, and substantive program information.

    Dated: March 13, 1995.
Margery G. Grubb,
Senior Committee Management Specialist, NIH.
[FR Doc. 95-6568 Filed 3-16-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                     OF
                          ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                     OF
                            OTR EXPRESS, INC.

The undersigned, OTR Express, Inc., a Kansas corporation (the 
"Corporation"), for the purpose of amending the Articles of 
Incorporation of the Corporation, in accordance with the General 
Corporation Code of Kansas, does hereby make and execute this 
Certificate of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation and does hereby 
certify that:
1. The amendments to the Articles of Incorporation proposed by the 
directors and adopted by the stockholders of the Corporation are as 
follows:
 RESOLVED, that the first paragraph of ARTICLE FOURTH of the 
Corporation's Articles of Incorporation be deleted in its entirety and 
replaced with the following:
 The total number of shares of capital stock of all classes which the 
Corporation shall have authority to issue is 20,200,000 shares of stock, 
of which 200,000 shall be a series of preferred stock, with a par value 
of one cent ($.01) per share, and 20,000,000 shall be Common Stock, with 
a par value of one cent ($.01) per share.
2. The said amendments have been duly adopted in accordance with the 
provisions of Section 17-6602 of the Kansas Statutes Annotated.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Certificate of Amendment has been executed by 
the Corporation by its President and attested by its Secretary on this 
10th day of July, 1998.
OTR EXPRESS, INC.



                                           By:  /s/ Gary J. Klusman      
                                              Gary J. Klusman, President

ATTEST:



  /s/ Carolyn J. Davidson    
Carolyn Davidson, Secretary
<PAGE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 13, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3839

Knowles Corporation:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests and the 

request failed to show that this particular product is available only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
RECEIVED Court of Appeals .•-.;•

" *- • *• Clerk 5th District

* ^ >_^ i l^; ^ ^ -^ ^,-

'J+ki:iUe, C^.ai /sf nonefits

o 4 ...

:'•'''"' BaII^ |J^//^//9Ai

Th? &>»$#>«£ "TfK&,!< '•;• "<i:'•'•'' ' •'' irittU D/shzV/f" or Ic^as

,. ;,-u,/ '"y^—s •••<, ,--- .-••- ••• •• .:. • - - V^-' -v ~\ JAW 202015

^SaejpHulLi JgfQjxF.^f ^^J^QjQau_£jJ^jJ<^a/ a£ tine. MtsJeaf

JS_pilCpfi4,e. ibg__Lt£ rcfilto^fj^

^fe^^^

M

O ^^ COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

__ . ••'• '' . " -' ''' JAN 26 2015

Abel Acosta, Clerk
tUSMci-Ql,i

tC5^ A/Ja L^i U/^Lj £lTtLAjSi£^ ,o tme.

UAjfil hfikth IJ.3DM.

The,AafleJUafk&aai h'tuq Paa ^^.tej^inc^ihiitMc

tfod e£6 to

iMil£ sfcaaa.fcslrz%a/. ff<t CjMMhed! h Wm igajoJ; -fttofe- $?&.• fee

0^tpA£idia

\N he&.th<uL, flcemt5-ej&; teMsidg.a.ed fc, Ai#il #k*f

(IMQtM^iL^Ams p .tt/tf fhL5, noMp^ialc Lu/el l^JII tHr*fc ftgjft Aii Me,-. IdDu^sf .fa i^^^t;;fY?#.

iM> "•j.^ggjii li^-^x^^y

• : ' ' • ' •• . '•;••'•>' '• " •:" •' : " ,:.' '.•'•';;"' . -; •• •

• :: '- ; .'.••: : , .'"','" /'•..-' •'•.•'••' '• ',• ; ,''*.',.•.'; ••' :'- "••';..' .••..••. : .: • '

•' - - k '•..•.-• ._;./;''. ,:;'•.' ,' :;< ', ; ' ••'•' ;\: ;•' •'.-''

-

_.

-..'' ' •-•

| j ,!,.';" . i . . ' • ; -•, '••

! '-- /

• ' ' '• • ' '''•'•' * '
NOTICE: THIS FORM CONTAINS SENSITIVE DATA.

Unsworn Declaration

(Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code, Section 132.001)

My name is:_&* First ft

KJA IVjajf Middle

and

t \ hnmpSO^I •ft

my date of birth is:

Month Day Year

my address is: \LQf) FM ,^V<7 J^c/^ho/Ln TtXftS IL^X

IVUUi.

J i & i fin.

and

Country

My email address is _

Street Address

J/?nk

City

ALL

State

(Ifyou are incarcerated, you must also include the following information.)

My inmate identifying number, if any, is: f) I <3i~I<.'l~(/7 7.

Iam presently incarcerated in: l_iAiO/SfJJ Stf/iiK J/9/1 IJaJiT , / i ^ Connections Unit Name

in: \MC> J^I Tcx^js

City County State

Last

lip Code

-1(^5$.

Zip Code

I declare under penalty of perjury that all information in the attached document titled,

rVflnoxf (r>4 A- [o6 Dal/ 5"*fkiin/9Afl ,is true and correct.

T\ Name of Document rr

Signed in IAP K County, Tzkrt S

County State

on this date:

Month Day Year

Your Signature

Pursuant to Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code Section 132.001, an unsworn declaration may be

used in lieu of a written sworn declaration, verification, certification, oath, or affidavit required by statute or

required by a rule, order, or requirement adopted as provided by law. This provision does not apply to an

oath of office or an oath required to be taken before a specified official other than a notary public. An

unsworn declaration made under this section must be 1) in writing, 2) signed by the person making the

declaration as true under penalty of perjury and 3) in substantially the form used above.

© TexasLawHelp.org - Unsworn Declaration, August 2012 Page 1 of 1
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3528

Tianhai Electric North America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Christine Ward, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Giaccio, J.), rendered January 10, 1989, convicting her of assault in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and a new trial is ordered.

On May 6, 1988, the defendant, during an argument in her dwelling, stabbed Charles Monday, her boyfriend, in the abdomen with his knife. The defendant was indicted and convicted of assault in the first degree. At the trial, the defendant claimed that she acted in self-defense. According to the defendant’s version of the incident, Monday was the initial aggressor. The defendant testified that Monday first punched and kicked her while they were in her bedroom and then threatened to cut her throat with his knife. Next, Monday put his knife down on the bed and proceeded to beat the defendant with his fists when she grabbed the knife and stabbed Monday once in the stomach.

*567In its charge on the defense of justification, the trial court erroneously instructed the jury that the defendant had a duty to retreat. There is no duty to retreat when a defendant is in her own dwelling and, pursuant to her theory of justification, she was not the initial aggressor *(see, People v Emmick,*136 AD2d 892, 894; *People v Williams,*121 AD2d 145, 149). It is beyond cavil that the central issue in this case was justification. This error, coupled with the court’s failure to relate the law of justification to the facts of the case *(see, People v Emmick, supra; People v Williams, supra),*denied the defendant a fair trial. Accordingly, the judgment is reversed and a new trial is ordered.

We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.
2626 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 6 / Tuesday, January 10, 1995 / Sunshine Act Meetings

POSTAL RATE COMMISSION

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m., January 12,

1995.

PLACE: Conference Room, 1333 H Street,

NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20268.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: (1) Docket

No. R94–1—Request for

Reconsideration. (2) Docket No. C93–

2—Pending Parcel Post Rate Complaint.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Charles L. Clapp, Secretary, Postal Rate

Commission, Suite 300, 1333 H Street,

NW, Washington, DC 20268–0001,

Telephone (202) 789–6840.

Charles L. Clapp

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–663 Filed 1–6–95; 2:24 pm]

BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Obesity and Metabolism Research: Davis, CA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Laboratories
                        Bennett Group
                                    Huang Group
                                    Keim Group
                                    Laugero Group
                                    Newman GroupSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Davis, California Western Human Nutrition Research Center Obesity and Metabolism Research Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Research Projects Subjects of Investigation at this LocationEach ARS research project has related subjects of investigation.  Listed below are the subjects of investigation currently conducted at this location.
Clicking on a subject of investigation will list the research projects within that  subject of investigation.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2597

JAE Electronics, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3682

JLG Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
3XEOLF9HUVLRQRI%&,

3803%5$&.(7&$67,1*35(6685(&217$,1,1*+7&$67,521



3,$==$52%(57

35,&(3803&203$1<

2WKHU

12

3XEOLF9HUVLRQRI%&,
 .*

12

12



 .*

,03257,1*7+,63$57)520&+,1$&2676