alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 51 (Thursday, March 16, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 14263]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6506]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Forms Under Review by Office of Management and Budget
March 10, 1995.
    The Department of Agriculture has submitted to OMB for review the 
following proposal for the collection of information under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) since 
the last list was published. This list is grouped into new proposals, 
revisions, extension, or reinstatements. Each entry contains the 
following information:
    (1) Agency proposing the information collection; (2) Title the 
information collection; (3) Form number(s), if applicable; (4) Who will 
be required or asked to report; (5) An estimate of the number of 
responses; (6) An estimate of the total number of hours needed to 
provide the information; (7) Name and telephone number of the agency 
contact person.
    Questions about the items in the listing should be directed to the 
agency person named at the end of each entry. Copies of the proposed 
forms and supporting documents may be obtained from: Department 
Clearance Officer, USDA, OIRM, Room 404-W Admin. Bldg., Washington, 
D.C. 20250, (202) 690-2118.
Revision
<bullet> National Agricultural Statistics Service
Fruits, Nuts, and Specialty Crops
Business or other for-profit; Farms; 50,183 responses; 14,764 hours
Larry Gambrell (202) 720-5778
Extension
<bullet> Forest Service
Landownership Adjustments (35 CFR 254, Subpart A--Land Exchanges)
Individuals or households; Business or other for-profit; Not-for-profit 
institutions; 298 responses; 596 hours
Mike Williams (202) 205-1347

<bullet> Forest Service
Application for Permit; Non-Federal Commercial Use of roads
Restricted by Order
FS-7700-40
Business or other for-profit; 2,000 responses; 500 hours
David A. Badger (202) 205-1424
Larry K. Roberson,
Deputy Department Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-6506 Filed 3-15-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-01-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 26, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-1925

Arconic, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
alamoex101.htm













Exhibit 10.1


 





 




  





1











  









 




  





2











  









 




  





3











  









 

4
#### S. P. HOUSER v. W. T. LOVE, J. WHITE WARE, et al.

(Filed 28 January, 1935.)

Civil ACTION, before *Oglesby, J.,*at January Term, 1934. From LINCOLN.

Plaintiff was a depositor in the Commercial Bank and Trust Company of Gastonia, and the defendants are officers and directors of said hank. The allegations of the complaint are substantially identical with those appearing in *Bain et al. v. Love et al., ante,*588. The substantial *593difference in tbe allegations of tbe complaint in tbe two actions are perhaps found in paragraph 17 of the complaint in the case at bar. In said paragraph the plaintiff alleges that he deposited certain sums of money on 21 March, 1929, and prior to 3 April, 1929, and on 4 April, 1929, tbe day the bank was closed, and that “since closing of said bank on 4 April, 1929, plaintiff has received several dividends from the liquidating agent, together with paid checks, amounting to $1,500.”

The defendants demurred to the complaint upon the same ground as set out in the *Sain case, supra.*The trial judge sustained the demurrer and the plaintiff appealed.

*S. J. Durham, W. E. Ghilds, W. M. Nicholson, and J. Laurence J ones for plaintiff.*

*Clyde R. Eoey, W. C. Feimsler, A. C. J ones, D. B. Denny, B. R. Warren, and A. L. Quichel for defendants.*

Pee Oubiam.

The judgment is affirmed upon authority of *Sain v. Love, supra.*

Affirmed.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3349

CRRC MA Corporation:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because granting the request would undermine the objective of the Section 

301 investigation.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Eg ig E
Z6SZOLes NOTES eR RATE [Dow No. pesontt16N ae ita eo, ere,
("ON ONIMVHG) 6 -
(27.2)
(15.3) (11.9) 1
€ 10.7)
A
o (5.13) 1
ro S 5 A
n mn —k
40.4 a = 7 Zz 2
w ll b--5 23.7 a -
= I -- . 40.15 = 3
P 178, 20.379: 95
{ T 15.95." H
Wa i 4
MIN25+025HF 1154-1 10.75 #0. 4 0.64 H
ER £0. 4 15.3
Female 7 to. al 40.25 0.25
MATED CONDITIONCREF.) £0.15 : :
= . 3 to.5 E . ~ £0.25
tp .pto- 4 La k-B 4,234 (SCALE 2:1) . To. es
V7 ‘ +0.1 6.5 +901
. J € i in O 4-41.1° #0405 40,05 2-61 49,
NOTES +g aN 7 5 5 t)
g Sa 8. 1.
SS Lf . : :
. rs eo Co
ram] Sal Soi = oY 1
som SN] as. L_J (a) +t te x go
* vs} 3" | 3" i OP siéles
emt nm H T Yu TIM! 4
of} ow am Li]
+0.2 ts A B £0.05 +0.05 o
+2 ° £0.23 o 1 0-6
2%" 2 £0.25 £0.08 [tO-5 | x0. 05
a 40.08 20.4 3.8 40.25 0-5
NO 14 3.4 £0.4 2-95 le *
Al um 7:3 2-92.15° 5
y C a| Te 4
é: Fo. 05 £0.05
a o] Qu 14 2.95
Oe aoe = a A — P.0.B. LAYOUT-MOUNTING SIDE(REF.)
$%)/ $2,] Sa \ em © Qi 5 ERRAA Tk ( SS - BBB)
: nw -0.1
=| 5 | 1 2762 5 |025 TERMINAL 1_|COPPER ALLOY TIN PLATING
SELECTIVE GOLD PLATING
PANEL HOLE PATTERNS(REF.) at a oe 4 |INNER TERMINAL | 2 |COPPER ALLOY SELEOTIVE TIN PLATING
3 ares : .
NAMEAR TR (SF ) 3 |ouTER TERMINAL | 2 |COPPER ALLOY TIN PLATING
NOTE1.APPLICABLE P.C.B THICKNESS : 1.6mm 2
2.APPLY THE HEAT TO MELT RIB, SO THAT THE RIB MAY STICK FIRMLY TO P.C.B. BRACKET 1_|COPPER ALLOY TIN PLATING
WITHOUT LEAVING SPACE BETWEEN THEM. 1 {HOUSING 1_|@F PBT (COLOR: LIGHT GRAY)
3.PATTERN PROHIBITION AREA(CONNECTOR MOUNTING SIDE) Ee 2 fa # fem ab a #
4.THE DISTANCE SHALL BE MORE THAN 3mm WHEN HEATING TO MELT RIB. NO. DESCRIPTION QTY. MATERTAL FINISH REMARKS
3 5.COMPANY LOGO "JAE",MOLD CAVITY DESIGHNATOR AND MAETRIAL MARKS *PBT—GF30" [ftke (SPECIFICATION) FRTRCORTOINAL DATE) PSOE) NP ACAE SEG Ne a md
8 IS INDICATED AS SHOWN. JACS-20084 4 10-May-2007 2:1 oE2 AAMBET LANA
ui 6.THE ASSEMBLY LOT NO. IS INDICATED AS SHOWN. i ————_ kgamm VAPAN AVIATION
~| [-BRAE (GENERAL TOLERANCE) 484 ELE
s] 1 SARE : 16mm MENS ION NOL CHK. aaeusnins CE28211C002 Sex DUSTRY Lt
5 2 JEL TARE OAR OFFS AUR £7 BR CBRL MET SCL. iH (DIMENSTON) |EECANOLES) Pray MIYASHITA INDUSTRY, LTD.
: BNI —YRLER (TAIT RED) 40.8 |x # appo| Te
L A.VIBGRL I mMAETHS OL, Xx £004 | xox te *a Y Sup i Wimes (DRAWING NO. )
° 5. MRO TEC OHV —F PRL ORRETI. xx £0. 1 APPD, 2G i RECHASED
e 6.MROMECMTOY bh ORES. ext —| ——_ Om $J107597

MMA] TJ 17 1 1 1) 17 ~Y UAE CONNECTOR DIV. PROPRIETARY.
o 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 so 90 100 COPYRIGHT (C) 2007, JAPAN AVIATION ELECTRONICS INDUSTRY, LTD.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             490
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,753
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,237
<PP&E>                                       1,338,582
<DEPRECIATION>                                 525,757
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 898,113
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           92,382
<BONDS>                                        781,119
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,493
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   898,113
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               153,034
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                50,214
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              72,448
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 29,493
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             29,493
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    29,493
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### Jeanette A. MURRY, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. NATIONAL SUPER MARKETS, INC., Defendant/Respondent.

No. 66078.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Pour.

May 30, 1995.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 27, 1995.

Frank B. Green, Gumersell, Denk & Brinkman, St. Louis, for appellant.

Ann Marie Piaña, National Super Markets, Inc., St. Louis, for respondent.

Before AHRENS, P.J., and SIMON and KAROHL, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Jeanette A. Murry appeals from a jury verdict in favor of National Super Markets, Inc. in her personal injury claim against defendant arising out of her alleged slip and fall on its parking lot next to one of its supermarkets.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our holding.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4304 

To prohibit unfair treatment of cadets and midshipmen who refuse to get 

the COVID–19 vaccine, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2022 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself, Mr. MARSHALL, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. RISCH, Mr. BRAUN, 

Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. CRAMER, Mrs. HYDE-SMITH, Mr. SCOTT of Florida, 

Mr. DAINES, Mr. HOEVEN, and Mr. WICKER) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To prohibit unfair treatment of cadets and midshipmen who 

refuse to get the COVID–19 vaccine, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Defending Freedom 

5 of Conscience for Cadets and Midshipmen Act of 2022’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4304 IS

1 (1) COVERED INDIVIDUAL.—The term ‘‘covered 

2 individual’’ means a cadet or midshipman at a Fed3 eral service academy. 

4 (2) FEDERAL SERVICE ACADEMY.—The term 

5 ‘‘Federal service academy’’ means the following: 

6 (A) The United States Military Academy, 

7 West Point, New York. 

8 (B) The United States Naval Academy, 

9 Annapolis, Maryland. 

10 (C) The United States Air Force Academy, 

11 Colorado Springs, Colorado. 

12 (D) The United States Coast Guard Acad13 emy, New London, Connecticut. 

14 (E) The United States Merchant Marine 

15 Academy, Kings Point, New York. 

16 SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON VACCINE REQUIREMENT FOR 

17 GRADUATION FROM FEDERAL SERVICE 

18 ACADEMIES. 

19 A covered individual may not be required to be vac20 cinated for COVID–19 as a condition for graduation from 

21 a Federal service academy nor dismissed from a Federal 

22 service academy as a result of refusing to be so vaccinated. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4304 IS

1 SEC. 4. PROHIBITION ON ENFORCEMENT OF REPAYMENT 

2 PROVISIONS FOR REFUSAL TO RECEIVE VAC3 CINE. 

4 A covered individual who is prohibited from fulfilling 

5 his or her service agreement due to that individual’s deci6 sion not to be vaccinated for COVID–19 may not be sub7 jected to the repayment provisions of section 303a(e) or 

8 373 of title 37, United States Code, or to debt repayment 

9 collections provided for under chapter 176 of title 28, 

10 United States Code, pursuant to section 7448, 8459, or 

11 9448 of title 10, United States Code, section 1925 of title 

12 14, United States Code, or section 51306 of title 46, 

13 United States Code, as the case may be. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
ex4c.htm













 






SPORT TECH ENTERPRISES, INC.







TOTAL AUTHORIZED ISSUE


100,000,000 SHARES PAR VALUE $.001 EACH


COMMON STOCK







THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ________________________________________ IS THE OWNER OF _________________________________________________________________________ FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE ABOVE CORPORATION TRANSFERABLE ONLY ON THE BOOKS OF THE CORPORATION BY THE HOLDER HEREOF IN PERSON OR BY DULY AUTHORIZED ATTORNEY UPON SURRENDER OF THIS CERTIFICATE PROPERLY ENDORSED WITNESS, THE SEAL OF THE CORPORATION AND THE SIGNATURES OF ITS DULY AUTHORIZED OFFICERS.







DATED







 







 


SECRETARY                                                                                     PRESIDENT
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

AIDELI LEEANETTE JIMENEZ

,

Appellant

,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 20

- 00 0 03

- C R

Appeal from

County Court at Law No. 7

of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 20170 C 0 6112 )

O R D E R

The record before us does not contain the trial court’s certification of the defendant’s right

of appeal. T EX .R.A PP .P. 25.2(a)(2), (d). The trial court is ordered to prepare and file with the trial

court clerk within thirty days from the date of this order a certification of the defendant’s right of

appeal as required by T EX .R.A PP .P. 25.2(a)(2) and 25.2 (d). The trial court clerk shall prepare a

supplemental clerk’s record containing the certification and file it with this Court no later than

March 22 , 2020

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 6 th d ay of February , 20 20

.

PER CURIAM

Before Alley , C.J., R odriguez and Palafox , JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       8,596,323
<SECURITIES>                                30,840,202
<RECEIVABLES>                                  276,806
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         124,170
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              40,101,659
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     30,404,072
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,619,426
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                41,101,659
<SALES>                                      2,551,496
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,223,823
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,107,840
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             464,749
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                651,234
<INCOME-TAX>                                   260,494
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            390,740
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   390,740
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.15
        

</TABLE>
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Horticultural Crops Research Unit: Corvallis, OR
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Other
                        History
                                    Useful Links
                    HortHappenings News PageSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Corvallis, Oregon Horticultural Crops Research Unit Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Research Projects Subjects of Investigation at this LocationEach ARS research project has related subjects of investigation.  Listed below are the subjects of investigation currently conducted at this location.
Clicking on a subject of investigation will list the research projects within that  subject of investigation.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7378

STEPHEN M. CHRZAN, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

PAUL G. BUTLER, JR., Chairman, NC Parole Commission; WILLIS 

J. FOWLER, Commissioner; ANTHONY E. RAND, Commissioner; 

DERRICK E. WADSWORTH, Commissioner,

Defendants – Appellees, 

and 

PATRICK L. MCCRORY, Governor; BEVERLY PERDUE,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, 

District Judge. (5:13-ct-03156-BO)

Submitted: January 14, 2016 Decided: January 20, 2016

Before AGEE, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stephen M. Chrzan, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Jodi Harrison, NORTH 

CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Raleigh, North Carolina, 

for Appellees.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Stephen M. Chrzan, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Chrzan v. Butler, No. 5:13-ct-03156-BO (E.D.N.C. filed 

May 29, 2014; entered May 30, 2014 & July 31, 2015). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED