12574 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 7, 1995 / Notices

[FR Doc. 95–5531 Filed 3–6–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–M

[TA–W–30,523]

Xerox Corporation, Canadian, Latin

American Manufacturing Organization,

Pittsford, New York; Notice of Negative

Determination Regarding Application

for Reconsideration

By an application dated January 26,

1995, one of the petitioners requested

administrative reconsideration of the

subject petition for trade adjustment

assistance, TAA. The denial notice was

issued on January 12, 1995 and

published in the Federal Register on

February 10, 1995 (60 FR 8061).

Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c)

reconsideration may be granted under

the following circumstances:

(1) If it appears on the basis of facts

not previously considered that the

determination complained of was

erroneous;

(2) If it appears that the determination

complained of was based on a mistake

in the determination of facts not

previously considered; or

(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying

Officer, a misinterpretation of facts or of

the law justified reconsideration of the

decision.

Investigation findings show that the

workers of Canadian Latin American

Manufacturing Organization (CLAMO)

of Xerox Corporation in Pittsford, New

York do not produce an article within

the meaning of the Trade Act. The

workers instead perform engineering

and support services for articles

produced overseas.

Only in very limited circumstances

are service workers certified for TAA,

namely, the worker separations must be

caused by a reduced demand for their

services from a parent or controlling

firm or subdivision whose workers

produce an article and who are

currently under a certification for TAA.

(Emphasis supplied). These conditions

were not met for the CLAMO workers of

Xerox in Pittsford, New York.

The workers at the Office of

Document Products in Henrietta, New

York were certified because their

services were in direct support of the

production done at Xerox’ Webster,

New York plant whose workers were

certified under petition TA–W–29,744.

The Trade Act was not intended to

provide TAA benefits to everyone who

is in some way affected by foreign

competition but only to those who

produced an article and experienced a

decline in sales or production and

employment as a result of increased

imports of like or directly competitive

products.

Conclusion

After review of the application and

investigative findings, I conclude that

there has been no error or

misinterpretation of the law or of the

facts which would justify

reconsideration of the Department of

Labor’s prior decision. Accordingly, the

application is denied.

Signed at Washington, D.C., this 22nd day

of February, 1995.

Victor J. Trunzo,

Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment

Services, Office of Trade Adjustment

Assistance.

[FR Doc. 95–5532 Filed 3–6–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–M

Mine Safety and Health Administration

Advisory Committee; Establishment

AGENCY: Mine Safety and Health

Administration, Labor.

ACTION: Notice; extension of comment

period.

SUMMARY: In response to comments from

the mining community, the Mine Safety

and Health Administration (MSHA) is

expanding the membership of its

proposed advisory committee to

eliminate pneumoconiosis among coal

miners. To allow time for the mining

community to respond to this change,

MSHA is extending the comment period

on the establishment of the advisory

committee.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or

before March 17, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Send written comments to

the Office of Standards, Regulations and

Variances, MSHA, Room 631, 4015

Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia

22203.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Patricia W. Silvey, Director, Office of

Standards, Regulations and Variances,

MSHA, (703) 235–1910.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On

January 31, 1995, the Secretary of Labor

published a notice in the Federal

Register (60 FR 5947) announcing the

establishment of an advisory committee

on the elimination of pneumoconiosis

among coal miners. Comments

regarding the establishment of the

committee were due on March 1, 1995,

as indicated in a notice extending the

comment period published on February

17, 1995 (60 FR 9411).

In the January 1995 notice, MSHA

announced that there would be seven

committee members: one representing

labor, one representing industry, and

five persons who have no economic

interest in the industry. In the

comments received to date, several

members of the mining community

requested that the committee be

expanded to include two labor

representatives and two industry

representatives. In response to these

comments, MSHA has amended the

proposed charter. With this notice,

MSHA is announcing a nine-person

advisory committee: two representing

labor, two representing industry, and

five persons who have no economic

interest in the industry. To allow

persons sufficient time to comment on

this change, MSHA is extending the

comment period until March 17, 1995.

Dated: March 2, 1995.

Andrea M. Hricko,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Mine Safety

and Health.

[FR Doc. 95–5568 Filed 3–2–95; 3:40 pm]

BILLING CODE 4510–43–P

NATIONAL EDUCATION GOALS

PANEL

National Education Goals Panel

Meeting

AGENCY: National Education Goals

Panel.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the date

and location of a forthcoming meeting of

the National Education Goals Panel.

This notice also describes the functions

of the Panel.

DATES: March 13, 1995 from 1 p.m.–3

p.m.

ADDRESSES: J.W. Marriott Hotel, 1331

Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Salon G,

Washington, DC 20005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Noemi Friedlander, Deputy Director,

1850 M Street, NW., Suite 270,

Washington, DC 20036. Telephone:

(202) 632–0952.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

National Education Goals Panel, a

bipartisan panel of governors, members

of the Administration, members of

Congress and state legislators, was

created to monitor and report annually

to the President, Governor and Congress

on the progress of the nation toward

meeting the National Education Goals

adopted by the President and Governors

in 1989.

The meeting of the Panel is open to

the public. The agenda includes a

discussion of the evolving role and

impact of national academic standards