alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Hard Winter Wheat Genetics Research: Manhattan, KS
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Central Small Grain Genotyping Laboratory
                    Units
                        Center for Grain and Animal Health Research: Manhattan, KS
                                    Arthropod-Borne Animal Diseases Research Unit
                                    Grain Quality and Structure Research Unit
                                    Stored Product Insect & Engineering Research UnitSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Manhattan, Kansas Center for Grain and Animal Health Research Hard Winter Wheat Genetics Research Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications
- Hessian Fly Research Lab
- Sequencing Facility
- USDA Central Small Grain Genotyping Lab

Research Projects Subjects of Investigation at this LocationEach ARS research project has related subjects of investigation.  Listed below are the subjects of investigation currently conducted at this location.
Clicking on a subject of investigation will list the research projects within that  subject of investigation.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 4, 2015

t1028

Order 

Clerk

November 4, 2015

151843

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 151843

COA: 318560

Ionia CC: 2013-015693-FH

FLOYD PHILLIP ALLEN,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 30, 2015 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall 

address whether the second-offense habitual-offender enhancement set forth under MCL 

769.10 may be applied to the sentence prescribed under MCL 28.729(1)(b).
speexhfxincform10exh101.htm










Exhibit 10.1

 







  





1











  






 





 




  





2











  






 





 




  





3











  









 


 




  





4











  









 


 




  





5











  









 


 




  





6











  






 





 




  





7











  









 




  





8











  









 




  





9











  









 




  





10











  









 




  





11











  









 




  





12











  









 




  





13











  









 




  





14











  









 




  





15











  









 




  





16











  









 




  





17











  









 




  





18











  









 




  





19











  









 




  





20











  









 




  





21











  











  





22











  









 




  





23











  









 




  





24











  









 




  





25











  









 




  





26











  









 




  





27











  









 




  





28











  









 




  





29











  









 




  





30











  









 




  





31











  









 




  





32











  









 


33
#### John W. LIEBER, Jr. and Susan Lieber, Plaintiffs/Respondents, v. Gary GRIZZLE and Lisa Freeman, Defendants/Appellants.

No. 67960.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

March 19, 1996.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 24, 1996.

Application to Transfer Denied May 28, 1996.

S. Todd Hamby, St. Louis, for Appellant.

Michael A. Garvin, St. Louis, for Respondent.

Before CRAHAN, P.J., and CRANDALL and DOWD, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendants, Gary Grizzle and Lisa Freeman, appeal from the trial court’s judgment, following a bench trial, in favor of plaintiffs, John and Sue Lieber, in plaintiffs’ action for breach of residential sales contract.

We have reviewed the record and find that there was substantial evidence to support the judgment of the trial court; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0179

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

DOMINGO JOSE PALAFOX, 

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including September 20, 2021, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Beth Baker

Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 13 2021

08/13/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0179
<TABLE> <S> <C>
          
<ARTICLE>               5
                
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            12-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                        Dec-31-1998
<CASH>                                  212,031
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                         1,476,995
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      1,927,279
<PP&E>                               48,080,346
<DEPRECIATION>                       24,727,189
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       25,518,217
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 2,842,720
<BONDS>                               4,290,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                 45,174
<OTHER-SE>                           15,460,621
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         25,518,217
<SALES>                               9,565,933
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      9,989,608
<CGS>                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         3,234,996
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      1,362,540
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      375,800
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     (7,150,912)
<INCOME-TAX>                        (2,418,699)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 (4,732,213)
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                        (4,732,213)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            (1.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                            (1.05)
                        

</TABLE>
#### WILLIAM SEWELL SOREY v. W. L. NORTHERN.

(Filed 29 February, 1956.)

Appeal by defendant, from *Morris, J.,*at December 1955 Term, of PASQUOTANK.

Civil action instituted 11 July, 1951, to recover for injury to person, and damage to property arising out of collision on 22 August, 1948, between motor vehicles, allegedly resulting proximately from acts of negligence of defendant.

By consent of all parties hearing was had initially in term time before judge of Superior Court in lieu of the clerk of Superior Court, upon *630motions of defendant filed on 7 November, 1951, 10 January, 1952, 3 September, 1952, and 4 September, 1952, to dismiss the action for defect in the chain of process allegedly effecting discontinuance of the action.

The trial judge made thirty-nine findings of fact beginning with the issuance of summons to sheriff of Currituck County on 11 July, 1951, and the filing of complaint on the same date, and the return of the sheriff that defendant was not to be found in Currituck County, and concluding with service of *'pluries*summons and complaint upon defendant by sheriff of Dare County on 5 August, 1952,' — -and finding “that there has been a continuous chain of *alias*and *pluries*summonses issued within 90 days of the preceding summons, *alias*or *pluries,*dating back to the original summons on July 11, 1951.” The motions of defendant in respect to findings of fact as to form and procedure pertaining to the several links in the chain were denied, and to the judgment in accordance therewith defendant excepts and appeals to Supreme Court and assigns error.

*Wilson & Wilson for Plaintiff Appellee.*

*LeBoy & Goodwin for Defendants, Appellants.*

PeR CuRxam.

While defendant challenges the findings of fact made by the trial judge as to the several links in the chain of process, concluding as above set forth, such findings are supported by the record and are in keeping with well established principles of law and procedure effective in this State. A detailed narrative of events would serve no useful purpose. The judgment signed follows the facts found as a matter of law.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          25,575
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,726
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (128)
<INVENTORY>                                      8,886
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                40,244
<PP&E>                                          40,697
<DEPRECIATION>                                (24,761)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  58,124
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,286
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        214
<COMMON>                                         2,364
<OTHER-SE>                                      42,085
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    58,124
<SALES>                                         45,225
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                45,225
<CGS>                                           36,401
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   36,401
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    45
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,802)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,802)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.73)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.73)


</TABLE>
f8k061511ex10iii_epunk.htm


Exhibit 10.3


 


 


June 15, 2011


 


 


Shareholders and Board of Directors


TrueSport Alliances & Entertainment, Ltd.


 


 


Dear Sir/Madam:


 


This letter hereby serves as my notification to the shareholders and directors of Truesport Alliances & Entertainment, Ltd., a Nevada corporation, of my resignation, effective immediately, from my positions as Director of Truesport Alliances & Entertainments, Ltd.


 







 


/s/ Brent Stuchlik__


Brent Stuchlik
Exhibit 14.1

** **

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference inRegistration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-54356) of our report dated January 23,2003 (Except for Note 15 which date is May 1, 2003), with respect to the consolidatedfinancial statements of M-Systems Flash Disk Pioneers Ltd. included in theAnnual Report (Form 20-F/A) for the year ended December 31, 2002. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
| Tel-Aviv, Israel |   | KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERER                                                                  |
|------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| January 26, 2004 |   |           A  Member of Ernst & Young Global |

 

****
Exhibit 31.2I, Michael B. Wheeler, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief OperatingOfficer of Tufco Technologies, Inc., certify that:1.I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending September 30, 2006 of Tufco Technologies, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditorsand the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: December 29, 2006   /s/ Michael B. Wheeler Michael B. Wheeler  Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officerand Chief Operating Officer
Exhibit 99.2

                  Certification of Principal Financial Officer
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, Edward Lieberman, Chief Financial Officer of Phoenix Color Corp. (the
"Registrant"), certify that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 of the
Registrant ("the Report"):

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of
            the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Registrant.


/s/ Edward Lieberman
--------------------
Edward Lieberman
November 13, 2002
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 23, 2020

No. 04-20-00020-CR

IN RE STATE OF TEXAS, ex. rel. Todd A. “Tadeo” Durden, County Attorney

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

On April 20, 2020, relator filed a “First Motion for Sanctions.” On April 22, 2020, this 

court issued an opinion denying relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. Relator’s motion for 

sanctions is denied. 

It is so ORDERED on April 23, 2020.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

Michael A. Cruz,

Clerk of Court 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause Nos. 10041CR,10056CR, 10122CR, 10134CR,9711CR, 9712CR, 9892CR, 

styled The State of Texas v. Mark Anthony Gonzalez (Cause No. 10041CR), and twenty-one other cases, pending in 

the County Court, Kinney County, Texas. The Honorable Sid L. Harle signed the order at issue in this original 

proceeding.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4867 

To amend the Federal Credit Union Act to exclude extensions of credit 

made to veterans from the definition of a member business loan. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 25, 2023 

Mr. VICENTE GONZALEZ of Texas (for himself and Mr. FITZPATRICK) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Credit Union Act to exclude extensions of credit made to veterans from the definition 

of a member business loan. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Members 

5 Business Loan Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MEMBER BUSINESS LOAN DEFINITION. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 107A(c) of the Federal 

8 Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1757a(c)) is amended— 

9 (1) in paragraph (1)(B)— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4867 IH

1 (A) in clause (iv), by striking ‘‘or’’ at the 

2 end; 

3 (B) in clause (v), by striking the period 

4 and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

5 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(vi) made to a veteran;’’; 

7 (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

8 end; 

9 (3) in paragraph (3), by striking the period and 

10 inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

11 (4) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(4) the term ‘veteran’ has the meaning given 

13 such term under section 101 of title 38, United 

14 States Code.’’. 

15 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

16 subsection (a) shall take effect after the end of the 6- 

17 month period beginning on the date of the enactment of 

18 this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 58 (Monday, March 27, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15811]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7373]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
[CGD 95-026]


Navigation Safety Advisory Council

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Navigation Safety Advisory Council will meet at the 
Thirteenth Coast Guard District, 915 2nd Avenue, WA on Friday, April 
21, 1995, and at the Holiday Inn Crown Plaza, 1113 6th Avenue, Seattle, 
WA on Saturday, April 22, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Margie G. Hegy, Executive Director, Navigation Safety Advisory Council, 
U.S. Coast Guard (G-NSR-3), 2100 Second Street, SW, Washington, DC 
20593-0001, Telephone (202) 267-0415.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Committees will meet on Friday, April 21 
from 1 to 4 p.m. and on Saturday, April 22 from 8:30 to 11:30 a.m. 
Committee meetings may be held on Friday evening if additional time is 
needed. The discussions will include the following topics:

a. Navigation Rules

    1. Rule 3--Definition of ``Vessel engaged in Fishing''.
    2. Rule 20--Does Rule allow for additional apparatus to enhance the 
required lights?
    3. Rule 18--Responsibilities of Vessels.

b. Human Factors

    1. Manning Model Task List.
    2. Navigation Safety and Watchkeeping Code.
    The Council will convene in plenary session on Friday, April 21 at 
8 a.m. to 12 noon and reconvene on Saturday, April 22 at 1 to 4 p.m. to 
hear Committee status reports and any matters properly brought before 
the Council.
    The meeting is open to the public. Persons wishing to make oral 
statements should notify the Executive Director no later than 
Wednesday, April 19, 1995. Any person may present a written statement 
to the Council at any time without advance notice.

    Dated: March 16, 1995.
G.A. Penington,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Chief, Office of Navigation Safety and 
Waterway Services.
[FR Doc. 95-7373 Filed 3-24-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-14-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 56 (Thursday, March 23, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15300]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7146]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[ES-960-1420-00; ES-047170, Group 152, Wisconsin]


Filing of Plat of Survey; Wisconsin

    The plat of the survey of two islands in the Milwaukee River, in 
section 12, Township 8 North, Range 21 East, Fourth Principal Meridian, 
Wisconsin, will be officially filed in Eastern States, Springfield, 
Virginia at 7:30 a.m., on May 1, 1995.
    The survey was requested by the District Manager, Milwaukee 
District Office, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
    All inquiries or protests concerning the technical aspects of the 
survey must be sent to the Chief Cadastral Surveyor, Eastern States, 
Bureau of Land Management, 7450 Boston Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 
22153, prior to 7:30 a.m. May 1, 1995.
    Copies of the plat will be made available upon request and 
prepayment of the reproduction fee of $2.75 per copy.

    Dated: March 14, 1995.
Stephen G. Kopach,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor.
[FR Doc. 95-7146 Filed 3-22-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-M