alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2407

Amistco Separation Products dba AMACS:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, AS AMENDED


I, Pervez A. Qureshi, President and Chief Executive Officer of Activant Solutions Inc. (the “Company”), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended, that, to the best of my knowledge:


|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months endedDecember 31, 2010as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”); and

|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: February 9, 2011


/s/ Pervez A. QureshiName: Pervez A. QureshiTitle: President and Chief Executive Officer





The foregoing certification which accompanies the Report is not to be deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
#### LULA WATKINS, Administratrix of J. H. WATKINS, v. ÆTNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY.

(Filed 18 November, 1931.)

1. Insurance P b — Where policy sued on is not offered in evidence and there is no evidence that it was in force a nonsuit is proper.

In an action on an insurance policy a nonsuit is correctly entered in the court below when the policy contract is not offered in evidence and it is not made to appear that it was in force at the time in question.

*6822. Pleadings H a — Order of trial court allowing filing of pleadings after expiration of statutory time is upheld.

An order of the trial court allowing the defendant to file answer after the expiration of the statutory time is upheld upon authority of *Howard v. Hinson,*191 N. C., 366.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Sink, J.,*at June Term, 1931, of Guileoed.

Civil action to recover on a policy of group life insurance.

On 1 October, 1917, the defendant issued to Pomona Mills, Inc., its Group Policy of Life Insurance No. 369, covering the lives of certain employees.

On 1 February, 1922, the Pomona Mills, Inc., issued to J. H. Watkins, one of its employees at that time, certificate No. 1867, showing that his life was insured for $300 under the defendant’s Group Policy No. 369, “while you are in the employ of this company and during the continuance of the policy,” to be automatically cancelled, however, “if you are absent for more than two weeks without permission of the superintendent. . . . Permission will be granted for sickness or other unavoidable causes, provided you make application to the superintendent.”

Plaintiff’s intestate, the holder of this certificate, did no work for the Pomona Mills after April, 1928. He died 26 December, 1929. It is alleged that he was unable to give notice, etc., because of immediate mental derangement on leaving the mill. *Rhyne v. Ins. Go.,*196 N. 0., 717, 147 S. E., 6, and 199 N. C., 419, 154 S. E., 749.

Prom a judgment of nonsuit entered at the close of plaintiff’s evidence, she appeals.

*E. D. Xuyhendall and O. W. Duke for plaintiff.*

*Murray Allen for defendant.*

Pee CuRiam.

The contract of insurance issued by the defendant to Pomona Mills, Inc., under which, plaintiff claims, was not offered in evidence. Nor does it appear that it was in force when plaintiff’s intestate left the Pomona Mills or when he died. The judgment of nonsuit was properly entered.

The order made by the judge allowing defendant to file answer, after statutory time for filing had expired, is supported by the decision in *Howard v. Hinson,*191 N. C., 366, 131 S. E., 748.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 10.2



FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE

PROCESSING
PRODUCTION AGREEMENT



This First Amendment to the
Processing Production Agreement (the Amendment) is made as of the 8thday of August, 2003, by and
between Aurora Foods Inc., a Delaware corporation (Buyer), and Olmarc Packaging Co., an Illinois corporation (Producer).



WITNESSETH



WHEREAS, Buyer and Producer entered into that certain Processing Production Agreement dated as of December 23, 1998 (the Agreement);



WHEREAS, both parties desire to amend the Agreement.



NOW, THEREFORE, for mutual and adequate consideration,
Producer and Buyer agree as follows:



|1. | Paragraph 1 of the Agreement shall be amended so that the Original Term shall end December 23, 2004.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have each caused this Amendment to be executed by their respective duly authorized
representative to be effective as of the date first set forth above.



|AURORA FOODS INC. (Buyer) |  |                     |  | OLMARC PACKAGING CO. (Producer)
|--------------------------- |  | ------------------- |  | ---------------------------------
|                            |  |                     |  |                                  
|By:                         |  | /s/    Steve Smiley |  |                                  
|                            |  |                     |  |                                  
|Print Name:                 |  | Steve Smiley        |  |                                  
|Title:                      |  | V.P. Purchasing     |  |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000882342
<NAME> 90CC
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         107,295
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   79,853
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               187,148
<PP&E>                                       5,775,729
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,948,614
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,014,263
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,718
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     997,545
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,014,263
<SALES>                                        537,893
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               542,256
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  405,150
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                137,106
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            137,106
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   137,106
<EPS-BASIC>                                      18.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 21.1
 POWERSECURE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
 List of Subsidiaries
 PowerSecure, Inc., a Delaware corporationEfficientLights, LLC, a Delaware limited liability companyInnovative Electronic Solutions Company, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (2/3 ownership)EnergyLite, Inc., a Delaware corporationPowerPackages, LLC, a Delaware limited liability companyPowerServices, Inc., a North Carolina corporationReids Trailer, Inc., a Delaware corporationUtilityDesign, Inc., a North Carolina corporationUtilityEngineering, Inc., a North Carolina corporationPowerSecure Haiti USA, Inc., a Delaware corporationMarcum Gas Metering, Inc., a Florida corporationMetretek Contract Manufacturing Company, Inc., a Florida corporationWaterSecure Holdings, Inc., a Colorado corporationMarcum Capital Resources, Inc., a Colorado corporationMarcum Midstream 1995-2 Business Trust, a Delaware statutory trust (Less than majority ownership)PowerSpring, Inc. a Delaware corporationMercator Energy Incorporated, a Colorado corporationMarcum Denver, Inc., a Colorado corporation
#### DAVIS v. JENKINS.

(Filed 6 January, 1953.)

PbtitioN to rehear case reported *ante,*283.

*F. T. Hall and P. H. Bell for plaintiff.*

*Thorp & Thorp for defendants.*

Devin, C. J.

Petition to rehear was “allowed only for the purpose of amplification of the order remanding the cause for further proceeding.”

In the decision of this Court filed 8 October, 1952, and reported in *ante,*283, it was held on the facts therein set out that sale and deed attacked were voidable, and it was ordered that the judgment of nonsuit be stricken out and the cause remanded for further proceedings as might be necessary to determine and administer the rights of all interested parties. By this order it was not intended to foreclose the defendants from submitting to the Superior Court on another trial the defenses set up in their answer, nor may the opinion heretofore filed and reported be understood as denying to the defendants right to trial by jury of the issues raised by the pleadings.

With this amplification the petition to rehear is denied.

Petition denied.
EXHIBIT 23



                         Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8  No.  333-  90957)  pertaining  to the  Home-Stake  Oil & Gas  Company  1997
Incentive  Stock Plan of our report  dated March 24,  2000,  with respect to the
financial  statements  of  Home-Stake  Oil & Gas Company  included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended December 31, 1999.


                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Tulsa, Oklahoma
March 24, 2000



                                      - 1 -

<PAGE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3567

Scosche Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Howard M. SipznerHoward M. SipznerExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate: August 7, 2009
 
 *
    
    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Brandywine Realty Trust and will be retained by Brandywine Realty Trust and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2925

Mabuchi Motor America Corp:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_05.09.19.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3124

CW Bearing USA, Inc:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Ginger L. Graham, the ChiefExecutive Officer of Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”), andMark G. Foletta, the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his or her knowledge:

**1.            **The Company’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006, to which thisCertification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Periodic Report”), fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

**2.            **The informationcontained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by thePeriodic Report and results of operations of the Company for the period coveredby the Periodic Report.

Dated:  February26, 2007
| /s/ GINGER L. GRAHAM    |                                                        | /s/ MARK G. FOLETTA |   |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------|--------|
| Ginger L. Graham        | Mark G. Foletta                                             |
| Chief Executive Officer | Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial  Officer |

 

 

----
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4352 

To require a study on the effects of travel nurse agencies on the health 

industry during the COVID–19 pandemic. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 6, 2022 

Mr. CRAMER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To require a study on the effects of travel nurse agencies 

on the health industry during the COVID–19 pandemic. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Travel Nursing Agency 

5 Transparency Study Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. GAO STUDY ON TRAVEL NURSE AGENCIES. 

7 The Comptroller General of the United States shall— 

8 (1) conduct a study on the effects of travel 

9 nurse agencies on the health care industry during 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4352 IS

1 the COVID–19 pandemic, which shall include con2 sideration of— 

3 (A) the business practices and payment 

4 practices of such agencies, including any poten5 tial price gouging and taking of excessive prof6 its; 

7 (B) the difference between how much such 

8 agencies charged health care institutions and 

9 how much they paid their contracted nurses; 

10 (C) the extent to which such agencies 

11 could provide more transparency regarding the 

12 payments received from health care institutions, 

13 and the payments made by the agencies to the 

14 nurses who are contracted by such agencies; 

15 (D) the specific ways in which rural areas 

16 of the United States were affected by the rise 

17 of travel nursing across the country, and subse18 quent workforce shortage disparities; 

19 (E) how States that imposed caps to travel 

20 nurse pay were affected by the market reaction 

21 to such caps; 

22 (F) how Federal funds, including the Pro23 vider Relief Fund and any assistance granted to 

24 a health care institution under the Robert T. 

25 Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency AssistVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:20 Jun 07, 2022 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S4352.IS S4352

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4352 IS

1 ance Act (42 U.S.C. 5 121 et seq.), were used 

2 by health care institutions to pay such agencies 

3 throughout the workforce shortages exacerbated 

4 by the COVID–19 pandemic; 

5 (G) the extent to which travel nurse agen6 cy practices contribute to workforce shortages; 

7 and 

8 (H) the extent to which travel nurse agen9 cies have been acquired by private equity firms 

10 and the impact of such acquisitions on the prof11 its of the agencies; and 

12 (2) not later than 1 year after the date of en13 actment of this Act, submit a report to Congress on 

14 such study. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS