alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### MARGARET SWANN v. W. P. BIGELOW.

(Filed 14 December, 1955.)

Trial §§ 33, 42: Negligence § 21—

The jury answered the issues of negligence and contributory negligence in the affirmative and awarded damages. *Held:*The court should have accepted the verdict and rendered judgment thereon, treating the award of damages as surplusage, and when the court erroneously refuses to accept the verdict and sends the jury back for further deliberation, judgment for plaintiff upon the revised verdict will be set aside and a new trial awarded.

Appeal by defendant from *Fountain, S. J.,*April 1955 Term Superior Court, Caswell.

Civil action to recover for personal injury and property damage growing out of a collision between automobiles driven by the parties. The following issues arose on the pleadings and were submitted to the jury:

1. Was the plaintiff injured and her automobile damaged by the negligence of the defendant as alleged in the complaint?

2. If so, did the plaintiff by her own negligence contribute to her own injury and damage as alleged in the further answer?

3. (a) What amount, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover of the defendant for damages to her automobile?

(b) What amount, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover of the defendant for personal injury?

4. Was the defendant injured and his automobile damaged by negligence of the plaintiff as alleged in the further answer?

5. (a) What amount, if any, is the defendant entitled to recover of the plaintiff for damages to his automobile?

(b) What amount, if any, is the defendant entitled to recover of the plaintiff for personal injury?

The jury returned into court having answered issue No. 1, Yes; No. 2, Yes; No. 3 (a) $830.00; (b) $98.00. The presiding judge refused to accept the verdict. He instructed the jury their attempted answers to issues Nos. 2 and 3 were inconsistent and directed them to return to the jury room and reconsider their verdict on those issues. The jury returned into court after changing the answer to the second issue from "Yes” to “No.” The verdict as changed was accepted by the court and *286judgment based thereon was signed. The defendant excepted and appealed.

*John W. Hardy for plaintiff, appellee.*

*D. E. Scarborough, C. 0. Pearson, William A. Marsh, Jr., and E. H. Gadsden for defendant, appellant.*

Per Curiam.

The presiding judge was in error in holding the answers to issues 2 and 3 as first returned by the jury were inconsistent. The court should have accepted the verdict and rendered judgment thereon, treating the answers to issue No. 3 as surplusage. To send the jury back for further consideration and to accept the verdict after the change was error. However, since the verdict as first returned was not accepted by the court there has been no proper verdict rendered in the case and for that reason the judgment entered is set aside. *Butler v. Gantt,*220 N.C. 711, 18 S.E. 2d 119. The cause is remanded to the Superior Court of Caswell County for a

New trial.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3329

CW Bearing USA, Inc:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 47 (Friday, March 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 13118]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6009]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Export Administration


Materials Technical Advisory Committee; Open Meeting

    A meeting of the Materials Technical Advisory Committee will be 
held April 6, 1995, 10:30 a.m., in the Herbert C. Hoover Building, Room 
1617M(2), 14th & Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, D.C. The 
Committee advises the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Export 
Administration with respect to technical questions that affect the 
level of export controls applicable to advanced materials and related 
technology.

Agenda

    1. Opening remarks by the Chairman.
    2. Presentation of papers or comments by the public.
    3. Presentation by the Office of Strategic Industries and Economic 
Security on the services it provides to companies engaged in the export 
of controlled commodities.
    4. Presentation by the Office of Chemical and Biological Controls 
and Treaty Compliance and agreements affecting export of Category 1 
commodities.
    5. Discussion on ECCN 1C60C: Precursor and intermediate chemicals 
used in the production of chemical warfare agents. Specifically, on 
whether or not control on Item 25, hydrogen fluoride, includes 
hydrofluoric acid.
    The meeting will be open to the public and a limited number of 
seats will be available. To the extent that time permits, members of 
the public may present oral statements to the Committee. Written 
statements may be submitted at any time before or after the meeting. 
However, to facilitate distribution of public presentation materials to 
the Committee members, the Committee suggests that presenters to the 
Committee members, the Committee suggests that presenters forward the 
public presentation materials two weeks prior to the meeting date to 
the following address:

Ms. Lee Ann Carpenter
TAC Unit/OAS/EA--Room 3886C
Bureau of Export Administration
U.S. Department of Commerce
Washington, DC 20230

    For further information or copies of the minutes, contact Lee 
Ann Carpenter on (202) 482-2583.

    Dated: March 7, 1995.
Lee Ann Carpenter,
Director, Technical Advisory Committee Unit.
[FR Doc. 95-6009 Filed 3-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DT-M
EXHIBIT  99.1

                             INSIDERSTREET.COM, INC.
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of Insiderstreet.com, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending January 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Richard McClearn, the President and Director of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/  RICHARD MCCLEARN
-----------------------------------
Richard McClearn
President and Director (Principal Executive Officer)
March 19, 2003
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3228

Royal Consumer Information Products, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 400 

AN ACT 

To designate the headquarters building of the Department 

of Transportation located at 1200 New Jersey Avenue, 

SE, in Washington, DC, as the ‘‘William T. Coleman, 

Jr., Federal Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 400 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘William T. Coleman, 

3 Jr., Department of Transportation Headquarters Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. WILLIAM T. COLEMAN, JR., FEDERAL BUILDING. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The headquarters building of the 

6 Department of Transportation located at 1200 New Jer7 sey Avenue, SE, in Washington, DC, shall be known and 

8 designated as the ‘‘William T. Coleman, Jr., Federal 

9 Building’’. 

10 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg11 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

12 States to the building referred to in subsection (a) shall 

13 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘William T. Coleman, 

14 Jr., Federal Building’’. 

Passed the Senate April 14, 2021. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 400 

AN ACT 

To designate the headquarters building of the De-

‘‘William T. Coleman, Jr., Federal Building’’. Jersey Avenue, SE, in Washington, DC, as the partment of Transportation located at 1200 New
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7330
CURTIS LEON TAYLOR, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DANVILLE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; PAMELA HOLCOMB, Nurse; T. M. ALABANZA, Dr., Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-96-657-R) Submitted: February 26, 1998 Decided: March 16, 1998 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Curtis Leon Taylor, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. William Carrington Thompson, Chatham, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Curtis Leon Taylor, Sr., appeals the district court's order denying him preliminary injunctive relief. We dismiss the appeal asmoot. Taylor sought to have the district court direct the Defendants to provide him a hernia operation. While his appeal was pending, Taylor was released from incarceration. Because Taylor can no longer receive the relief he requested, we dismiss the appeal as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

PAULINE HALL,

Appellant,

v.

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE, SUCCESSOR IN 

INTEREST TO BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS 

TRUSTEE AS SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO LASALLE BANK 

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR CERTIFICATE 

HOLDERS OF BEAR STEARNS ASSET BACKED SECURITIES I,

Appellee.

No. 4D14-2244

[August 19, 2015]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Michael L. Gates, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2012CA031410.

Bruce K. Herman of The Herman Law Group, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for 

appellant.

Nicholas S. Agnello and John R. Chiles of Burr & Forman LLP, Fort 

Lauderdale, for appellee.

ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Appellee U.S. Bank’s Response to Appeal states that “pursuant to the 

Parties’ Settlement Agreement [the Bank] confesses error below and does 

not oppose reversal of the Final Judgment.” We accept this proper 

confession of error and, accordingly, reverse.

Reversed.

TAYLOR, CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT
      32




**Certifications
      of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**









Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
      undersigned officers of LMI Aerospace, Inc., a Missouri corporation (the
“Company”), does hereby certify that, to the best of their
      knowledge:




The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2004
      (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained
      in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
                May 15, 2006
            /s/
                Ronald S. SaksRonald
                S. Saks
              President
                and Chief Executive Officer
              (Principal
                Executive Officer)








Date:
                May 15, 2006
            /s/
                Lawrence E. DickinsonLawrence
                E. Dickinson
              Secretary
                and Chief Financial Officer
              (Principal
                Financial and Principal Accounting
              Officer)





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      LMI Aerospace, Inc. and will be retained by LMI Aerospace, Inc. and furnished
      to
      the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 40 (Wednesday, March 1, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 11117]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5003]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-30,137]


Diamond Tool and Horseshoe Company, Duluth, Minnesota; Notice of 
Revised Determination on Reconsideration

    On February 14, 1995, the Department issued an Affirmative 
Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration for the former 
workers of the subject firm. The notice will soon be published in the 
Federal Register.
    The subject plant ceased operations in September, 1994 and all 
workers were laid off at that time.
    U.S. imports of pliers, wrenches, horse and mule shoes increased in 
1993 compared to 1992 and in the latest 12-month period ending in 
August 1994 compared to the same period ending in August 1993.
    On reconsideration, the workers submitted a new list of customers 
who decreased their purchases from the subject firm in the relevant 
time periods. New findings on reconsideration show that customers 
accounting for a substantial portion of Diamond Tool's sales decline in 
1993 and in the first six months of 1994 compared to their immediate 
earlier respective periods increased their purchases of imports in the 
same periods.

Conclusion

    After careful consideration of the new facts obtained on 
reconsideration, it is concluded that the former workers of the Diamond 
Tool and Horseshoe Company in Duluth, Minnesota were adversely affected 
by increased imports of articles that are like or directly competitive 
with horseshoes, wrenches and pliers and related equipment.
    In accordance with the provisions of the Act, I make the following 
revised determination for workers of the Diamond Tool and Horseshoe 
Company in Duluth, Minnesota.

``All workers and former workers of Diamond Tool and Horseshoe 
Company, Duluth, Minnesota who became totally or partially separated 
from employment on or after April 14, 1993 are eligible to apply for 
adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.''

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 17th day of February, 1995.
Victor J. Trunzo,
Program Director, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 95-5003 Filed 2-28-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Exhibit 32.1 

RULE 13(a)-14(b) CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Brandywine Operating Partnership, L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gerard H. Sweeney, President and Chief Executive Officer of Brandywine Realty Trust, the Partnership’s sole general partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| /s/ Gerard H. Sweeney                                                                           |   |   |        |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|                                                                                                 |   |   |   |
| Gerard          H. SweeneyPresident and Chief Executive Officer

Date:          August 14, 2006 |   |   |   |

 

----
No. 72-6441.

#### Matthews *v.*Wingo, Warden.

C A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2083

Heavy Motions, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
II 

Calendar No. 651 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 419 

[Report No. 117–260] 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide for a full annuity supplement 

for certain air traffic controllers. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 24, 2021 

Mr. INHOFE (for himself, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. MORAN, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. 

BENNET, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. 

BROWN, Mrs. CAPITO, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. CASSIDY, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. 

COTTON, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. DAINES, Ms. DUCKWORTH, Ms. 

ERNST, Mrs. FISCHER, Mr. GRASSLEY, Ms. HASSAN, Mr. HOEVEN, Mrs. 

HYDE-SMITH, Mr. KAINE, Mr. KENNEDY, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. 

MANCHIN, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. MARSHALL, Mr. MERKLEY, Mr. RISCH, Ms. 

ROSEN, Mr. RUBIO, Ms. SINEMA, Mr. TESTER, Mr. THUNE, Mr. TILLIS, 

Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Ms. WARREN, Mr. WICKER, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. 

LANKFORD, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. KELLY, Mr. SULLIVAN, Mr. CASEY, and 

Mrs. GILLIBRAND) introduced the following bill; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental 

Affairs 

DECEMBER 15, 2022 

Reported by Mr. PETERS, without amendment 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide for a 

full annuity supplement for certain air traffic controllers. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 419 RS

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Continuity for Opera5 tors with Necessary Training Required for ATC Contract 

6 Towers Act of 2021’’ or the ‘‘CONTRACT Act of 2021’’. 

7 SEC. 2. ANNUITY SUPPLEMENT. 

8 Section 8421a(c) of title 5, United States Code, is 

9 amended— 

10 (1) by striking ‘‘as an air traffic’’ and inserting 

11 the following: ‘‘as an— 

12 ‘‘(1) air traffic’’; 

13 (2) in paragraph (1), as so designated, by strik14 ing the period at the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

15 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

16 ‘‘(2) air traffic controller pursuant to a contract 

17 made with the Secretary of Transportation under 

18 section 47124 of title 49.’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 651 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 419 

[Report No. 117–260] 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide 

fic controllers. for a full annuity supplement for certain air trafDECEMBER 15, 2022 

Reported without amendment 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS