3270 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 9 / Friday, January 13, 1995 / Notices

to the Final Judgment in the Securities

Case under Section 20(d) of the

Securities Act, 15 U.S.C. § 77t(d), and

Section 21(d)(3) of the Exchange Act, 15

U.S.C. § 78u(d)(3) (‘‘Additional Civil

Penalty’’). Upon the payment of the

Additional Civil Penalty, the releases

described in paragraph 3 shall be

effective.

8. Caxton understands that the United

States has not waived the right of any

federal agency, with respect to Caxton

or any other person: (a) to revoke or

suspend any license, certificate,

registration or other form of permission

issued by such agency; (b) to impose

any penalty or to take any form of

punitive or disciplinary action; or (c) to

debar, suspend, disqualify, or otherwise

restrict or prohibit certain transactions

or other dealings with the United States

or with any of its agencies or

departments.

9. Caxton hereby waives any right it

might have as a result of this Agreement

or any settlement arrangements

contemplated hereby under the United

States Supreme Court’s decision in

United States v. Halper, 490 U.S. 435

(1989), or in respect of the subject

matter of that case or under any other

existing or future decision relating to

that subject matter.

10. Caxton neither admits nor denies

any of the factual allegations pertaining

to the matters described in the

Complaint to be filed pursuant to

paragraph 2, nor does Caxton either

admit or deny any legal liability arising

therefrom. Nothing in this Agreement or

in the Final Judgment or any Order

contemplated hereby shall constitute a

finding of fact or conclusion of law or

otherwise provide any basis for

establishing such liability.

11. Caxton shall pay the civil penalty

imposed by the Court in the Securities

Case and contribute the funds to

establish the disgorgement fund as

specified in the Securities Case Final

Judgment (collectively, the ‘‘Initial

Payment’’). Pursuant to this Agreement

and the Tunney Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 16 (b)

through (g), the forfeiture provided for

in the Final Judgment shall not be paid

until five (5) business days after Caxton

receives notice of entry of the Final

Judgment, or such other order as

represents a final disposition of the

captioned case. At that time, in addition

to the $12.5 million payment specified

in the Final Judgment (‘‘Deferred

Payment’’), Caxton shall forfeit an

‘‘Additional Amount,’’ as defined

below. The term ‘‘Additional Amount’’

shall mean an amount representing

interest on the Deferred Payment,

computed on the basis of a 365 day year,

at a rate per annum of 53⁄4%, from and

including the date of the Initial

Payment, but excluding the date on

which the Deferred Payment is made.

To the extent the Court does not impose

any portion of the Deferred Payment or

the Additional Amount, such amounts

shall nonetheless be paid to the United

States pursuant to paragraph 7 at the

time specified herein.

12. This Agreement, and all the terms

and provisions hereof, shall be binding

on the parties hereto and their

respective successors and assigns, and

shall inure only to the benefit of the

parties hereto, and other persons

specifically released pursuant to

paragraph 3, and their respective

successors and assigns, and no other

person shall be entitled to any benefits

hereunder.

13. No additional understandings,

promises, agreements and/or conditions

have been entered into by the parties

hereto with respect to the matters set

forth in this Agreement other than those

set forth herein and none will be

entered into unless in writing and

signed by all parties.

14. This Agreement may be executed

in multiple counterparts, each of which

shall constitute an original, but all of

which when taken together shall

constitute but one agreement.

15. This Agreement shall be deemed

to have been fully executed and

delivered when both the United States,

on the one hand, and Caxton, on the

other, have received counterparts hereof

executed on behalf of the other party by

each of the signatories for such other

party set forth on the signature pages

hereof.

Agreed to:

December 14, 1994.

United States of America

John F. Greaney,

Chief, Computers and Finance Section,

Antitrust Division, Department of Justice.

Caxton Corporation

December 15, 1994.

Peter P. D’Angelo,

President, Caxton Corporation.

[FR Doc. 95–781 Filed 1–12–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Office of the Secretary

Glass Ceiling Commission;

Postponement of Commission

Meetings

SUMMARY: Due to the scheduling

difficulties of participants, the Glass

Ceiling Commission meetings have been

postponed. The meetings had been

announced previously in the Federal

Register of January 9, 1995, 60 FR 2403.

The Commission meetings were to take

place on Monday, January 23, 1995, 4:00

pm–7:00 pm and Tuesday, January 24,

1995, 9:00 am to 12 noon at the

Department of Labor. The Commission

meeting will be rescheduled at a later

date.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.

Rene ́ A. Redwood, Executive Director,

Glass Ceiling Commission, U.S.

Department of Labor, 200 Constitution

Avenue NW., Room C–2313,

Washington, DC 20210, (202) 219–7342.

Signed at Washington, DC this 9th day of

January, 1995.

Rene ́ A. Redwood,

Executive Director.

[FR Doc. 95–910 Filed 1–12–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–23–M

Employment Standards Administration

Wage and Hour Division

Minimum Wages for Federal and

Federally Assisted Construction;

General Wage Determination Decisions

General wage determination decisions

of the Secretary of Labor are issued in

accordance with applicable law and are

based on the information obtained by

the Department of Labor from its study

of local wage conditions and data made

available from other sources. They

specify the basic hourly wage rates and

fringe benefits which are determined to

be prevailing for the described classes of

laborers and mechanics employed on

construction projects of a similar

character and in the localities specified

therein.

The determinations in these decisions

of prevailing rates and fringe benefits

have been made in accordance with 29

CFR part 1, by authority of the Secretary

of Labor pursuant to the provisions of

the Davis-Bacon Act of March 3, 1931,

as amended (46 Stat. 1494, as amended,

40 U.S.C. 276a) and of other Federal

statutes referred to in 29 CFR part 1,

Appendix, as well as such additional

statutes as may from time to time be

enacted containing provisions for the

payment of wages determined to be

prevailing by the Secretary of Labor in

accordance with the Davis-Bacon Act.

The prevailing rates and fringe benefits

determined in these decisions shall, in

accordance with the provisions of the

foregoing statutes, constitute the

minimum wages payable on Federal and

federally assisted construction projects

to laborers and mechanics of the

specified classes engaged on contract

work of the character and in the

localities described therein.
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 9 / Friday, January 13, 1995 / Notices 3271

Good cause is hereby found for not

utilizing notice and public comment

procedure thereon prior to the issuance

of these determinations as prescribed in

5 U.S.C. 553 and not providing for delay

in the effective date as prescribed in that

section, because the necessity to issue

current construction industry wage

determinations frequently and in large

volume causes procedures to be

impractical and contrary to the public

interest.

General wage determination

decisions, and modifications and

supersedes decisions thereto, contain no

expiration dates and are effective from

their date of notice in the Federal

Register, or on the date written notice

is received by the agency, whichever is

earlier. These decisions are to be used

in accordance with the provisions of 29

CFR parts 1 and 5. Accordingly, the

applicable decision, together with any

modifications issued, must be made a

part of every contract for performance of

the described work within the

geographic area indicated as required by

an applicable Federal prevailing wage

law and 29 CFR part 5. The wage rates

and fringe benefits, notice of which is

published herein, and which are

contained in the Government Printing

Office (GPO) document entitled

‘‘General Wage Determinations Issued

Under The Davis-Bacon And Related

Acts,’’ shall be the minimum paid by

contractors and subcontractors to

laborers and mechanics.

Any person, organization, or

governmental agency having an interest

in the rates determined as prevailing is

encouraged to submit wage rate and

fringe benefit information for

consideration by the Department.

Further information and selfexplanatory forms for the purpose of

submitting this data may be obtained by

writing to the U.S. Department of Labor,

Employment Standards Administration,

Wage and Hour Division, Division of

Wage Determinations, 200 Constitution

Avenue, NW., Room S–3014,

Washington, DC 20210.

Modification to General Wage

Determinations Decisions

The number of decisions listed in the

Government Printing Office document

entitled ‘‘General Wage Determinations

Issued Under the Davis-Bacon and

Related Acts’’ being modified are listed

by Volume and State. Dates of

publication in the Federal Register are

in parentheses following the decisions

being modified.

Volume I

None

Volume II

None

Volume III

Georgia

GA940003 (Feb. 11, 1994)

GA940022 (Feb. 11, 1994)

GA940040 (Feb. 11, 1994)

GA940050 (Feb. 11, 1994)

GA940065 (Feb. 11, 1994)

GA940073 (Feb. 11, 1994)

Volume IV

Michigan

MI940001 (Feb. 11, 1994)

MI940002 (Feb. 11, 1994)

MI940003 (Feb. 11, 1994)

MI940004 (Feb. 11, 1994)

MI940005 (Feb. 11, 1994)

MI940007 (Feb. 11, 1994)

MI940012 (Feb. 11, 1994)

MI940031 (Feb. 11, 1994)

MI940046 (Feb. 11, 1994)

MI940047 (Feb. 11, 1994)

Minnesota

MN940005 (Feb. 11, 1994)

MN940007 (Feb. 11, 1994)

MN940008 (Feb. 11, 1994)

MN940015 (Feb. 11, 1994)

MN940027 (Mar. 25, 1994)

MN940039 (Mar. 25, 1994)

MN940058 (Sep. 02, 1994)

MN940059 (Sep. 02, 1994)

MN940061 (Dec. 02, 1994)

Volume V

Missouri

MO940001 (Feb. 11, 1994)

MO940003 (Feb. 11, 1994)

MO940006 (Feb. 11, 1994)

MO940009 (Feb. 11, 1994)

MO940010 (Feb. 11, 1994)

MO940013 (Feb. 11, 1994)

MO940016 (Feb. 11, 1994)

MO940017 (Feb. 11, 1994)

MO940019 (Feb. 11, 1994)

MO940043 (Feb. 11, 1994)

MO940048 (Apr. 01, 1994)

MO940049 (Apr. 01, 1994)

MO940052 (Apr. 22, 1994)

MO940057 (Apr. 29, 1994)

MO940059 (Apr. 29 1994)

MO940063 (Apr. 29, 1994)

MO940064 (May 06, 1994)

MO940070 (May 13, 1994)

MO940073 (May 13, 1994)

MO940076 (May 13, 1994)

MO940077 (May 20, 1994)

MO940078 (May 20, 1994)

MO940079 (May 20, 1994)

Nebraska

NE940001 (Feb. 11, 1994)

NE940003 (Feb. 11, 1994)

NE940011 (Feb. 11, 1994)

NE940058 (Jul. 29, 1994)

Volume VI

California

CA940001 (Feb. 11, 1994)

CA940002 (Feb. 11, 1994)

CA940004 (Feb. 11, 1994)

General Wage Determination

Publication

General wage determinations issued

under the Davis-Bacon and related Acts,

including those noted above, may be

found in the Government Printing Office

(GPO) document entitled ‘‘General Wage

Determinations Issued Under The DavisBacon and Related Acts’’. This

publication is available at each of the 50

Regional Government Depository

Libraries and many of the 1,400

Government Depository Libraries across

the country. Subscriptions may be

purchased from: Superintendent of

Documents, U.S. Government Printing

Office, Washington, D.C. 20402, (202)

783–3238.

When ordering subscription(s), be

sure to specify the State(s) of interest,

since subscriptions may be ordered for

any or all of the six separate volumes,

arranged by State. Subscriptions include

an annual edition (issued in January or

February) which included all current

general wage determinations for the

States covered by each volume.

Throughout the remainder of the year,

regular weekly updates will be

distributed to subscribers.

Signed at Washington, D.C. this 6th day of

January 1995.

Alan L. Moss,

Director, Division of Wage Determination.

[FR Doc. 95–664 Filed 1–12–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–27–M

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND

SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 95–003]

National Environmental Policy Act;

Aerodynamic and Propulsion Testing

at Ames Research Center

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and

Space Administration (NASA).

ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an

environmental impact statement (EIS)

and conduct scoping for proposed

aerodynamic and propulsion testing in

the National Full-Scale Aerodynamics

Complex at Ames Research Center.

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National

Environmental Policy Act of 1969

(NEPA), as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et

seq.), the Council on Environmental

Quality Regulations for Implementing

the Procedural Provisions of NEPA (40

CFR parts 1500–1508), and NASA

policy and regulations (24 CFR part

1216 subpart 1216.3), NASA intends to

prepare an EIS for aerodynamic and

propulsion testing (hereinafter referred

to as the ‘‘Testing Program’’) at Ames

Research Center. This EIS will (1) serve

as programmatic EIS for NASA’s future

Testing Program activities at Ames

Research Center; (2) address specifically

a requirement for tests in support of the