alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 12.1
 
 Fiscal Year EndedSept. 30,
    
    
    Sept. 29,
    
    
    Sept. 28,
    
    
    Sept. 26,
    
    
    Sept. 25,2001(1)(2)
    
    
    2002(2)
    
    
    2003(2)
    
    
    2004(2)
    
    
    2005Earnings:Income before income taxes
    
    $
    13,897
    
    
    $
    18,510
    
    
    $
    15,946
    
    
    $
    111,140
    
    
    $
    39,908Amortization of capitalized interest
    
    
    338
    
    
    
    341
    
    
    
    352
    
    
    
    302
    
    
    
    251Interest
    
    
    53,846
    
    
    
    53,086
    
    
    
    52,524
    
    
    
    78,790
    
    
    
    55,211Less interest capitalized during
the period
    
    
    (238
    )
    
    
    (144
    )
    
    
    (144
    )
    
    
    (323
    )
    
    
    (1,111
    )Net amortization of debt discount
and premium and issuance
expense
    
    
    2,532
    
    
    
    3,158
    
    
    
    3,158
    
    
    
    11,321
    
    
    
    3,042Interest portion of rental expense
    
    
    21,407
    
    
    
    21,848
    
    
    
    22,740
    
    
    
    23,979
    
    
    
    25,461Earnings as adjusted
    
    $
    91,782
    
    
    $
    96,799
    
    
    $
    94,576
    
    
    $
    225,209
    
    
    $
    122,762Fixed charges:Interest
    
    $
    53,846
    
    
    $
    53,086
    
    
    $
    52,524
    
    
    $
    78,790
    
    
    $
    55,211Net amortization of debt discount
and premium and issuance
expense
    
    
    2,532
    
    
    
    3,158
    
    
    
    3,158
    
    
    
    11,321
    
    
    
    3,042Interest portion of rental expense
    
    
    21,407
    
    
    
    21,848
    
    
    
    22,740
    
    
    
    23,979
    
    
    
    25,461Fixed charges
    
    $
    77,785
    
    
    $
    78,092
    
    
    $
    78,422
    
    
    $
    114,090
    
    
    $
    83,714Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
    
    
    1.18
    
    
    
    1.24
    
    
    
    1.21
    
    
    
    1.97
    
    
    
    1.47
 
 (1)
    
    53-Week Fiscal Year(2)
    
    Includes the Companys 50% share of Santee. For fiscal 2004, includes the Companys 50%
share of Santee through February 6, 2004. Santee has been consolidated into the Companys
consolidated results since that date.
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 25 (Monday, February 8, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 6524]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02318]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication; Disorders 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the 
Board of Scientific Counselors, NIDCD.
    The meeting will be closed to the public as indicated below in 
accordance with the provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended for the review, discussion, and evaluation of 
individual intramural programs and projects conducted by the National 
Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, including 
consideration of personnel qualifications and performance, and the 
competence of individual investigators, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Board of Scientific Counselors, NIDCD.
    Date: March 8, 2016.
    Time: 3:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate personal qualifications and 
performance, and competence of individual investigators.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Building 31, Room 3C05, 31 
Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Andrew J. Griffith, Ph.D., MD, Director, 
Division of Intramural Research, National Institute on Deafness and 
Other Communication Disorders, 35A Convent Drive, GF 103 Rockville, 
MD 20892, 301-496-1960, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3255405b54545b4653725c5b5651561c5c5b5a1c555d44"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7c1b0e151a1a15081d3c1215181f1852121514521b130a">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: http://www.nidcd.nih.gov/about/groups/bsc/, where an agenda 
and any additional information for the meeting will be posted when 
available.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.173, 
Biological Research Related to Deafness and Communicative Disorders, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 2, 2016.
Sylvia Neal,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016-02318 Filed 2-5-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 2, 2017

NO. 03-16-00526-CR

Anthony Tucker, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 6 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND GOODWIN

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the trial 

court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Because 

appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
Exhibit 99.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                  -------------

I, John A.  Holmes  III,  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer  of NBG Radio
Network,  Inc.,  certify that, to the best of my knowledge,  the Form 10-QSB for
the fiscal quarter  ending August 31, 2002 fully complies with the  requirements
of  section  13(a)  or  15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 and that
information  contained in the periodic report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the NBG Radio
Network, Inc.

This  Certification  is not being  "filed"  as part of the Form  10-QSB  for the
fiscal quarter ending August 31, 2002.


                                 /s/ JOHN A. HOLMES III
                                 --------------------------------------------
                                 John A. Holmes III, President and
                                 Chief Executive Officer
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2317

Reelcraft Industries:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 15, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3851

Academy, Ltd:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
3XEOLF9HUVLRQRI%&,

3803%5$&.(7&$67,1*35(6685(&217$,1,1*+7&$67,521



3,$==$52%(57

35,&(3803&203$1<

2WKHU

12

3XEOLF9HUVLRQRI%&,
 .*

<(6

12

 .*

 .*

,03257,1*7+,63$57)520&+,1$&2676

385&+$6,1*5$:0$7(5,$/$1'0$&+,1,1*,7'20(67,&$//<&267
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-4078

Tianhai Electric North America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-1506

Sales Driven LLC dba Raybend:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 53 (Monday, March 20, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 14708]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6768]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[OH73-1-6809, OH74-1-6810, OH75-1-6811; FRL-5174-9]


Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Ohio

AGENCY: United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule; reopening of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The USEPA is reopening the comment period for a proposed rule 
published on January 17, 1995 (60 FR 3361). On January 17, 1995, USEPA 
proposed to approve exemptions from the nitrogen oxides (NO<INF>x) 
requirements as provided for in Section 182(f) of the Clean Air Act 
(Act) for the following ozone nonattainment areas in Ohio: Canton 
(Stark County); Cincinnati (Hamilton, Butler, Warren, and Clermont 
Counties); Cleveland (Ashtabula, Cuyahoga, Geauga, Lake, Lorain, 
Medina, Portage and Summit Counties); Columbus (Delaware, Franklin, and 
Licking Counties); Youngstown (Mahoning and Trumbull Counties); 
Steubenville (Jefferson and Columbiana Counties); Preble County; and 
Clinton County.
    The USEPA is reopening the comment period for this action to honor 
a request from the Ohio Sierra Club. The original request was for an 
extension of the public comment period by 90 days. The USEPA believes 
that additional time may be necessary to develop comments, but feels 
that an extension of 90 days, at this time, is not appropriate since a 
total of two adverse comments were received (and one supporting); and 
that no additional adverse comments are expected to be submitted by 
other entities. Therefore, USEPA is extending the original comment 
period by 45 days (until April 2, 1995).

DATES: Written comments on this action must be received by April 2, 
1995.

ADDRESSES: Written comments must be submitted to: William L. MacDowell, 
Chief, Regulation Development Section, Air Enforcement Branch (AE-17J), 
USEPA, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Schleyer, Environmental 
Engineer, Regulation Development Section, Air Enforcement Branch (AE-
17J), USEPA, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 
60604, (312) 353-5089.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7601q.

    Dated: March 9, 1995.
David A. Ullrich,
Acting Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 95-6768 Filed 3-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999             SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             446                   1,913
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  115,752                  85,995
<ALLOWANCES>                                       603                     940
<INVENTORY>                                     95,465                  83,389
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               241,476                 216,579
<PP&E>                                         182,575                 145,539
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,232                   8,086
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,553,319               1,454,973
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          290,514                 189,211
<BONDS>                                        836,778                 743,037
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           670                     670
<OTHER-SE>                                     580,463                 574,886
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,553,319               1,454,973
<SALES>                                        700,194                 507,966
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               700,194                 507,966
<CGS>                                          297,469                 209,451
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  297,469                 209,451
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               291,520                 209,881
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   603                     940
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              48,733                  51,197
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    840                (64,625)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       261                   (230)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                579                (64,395)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                 (9,325)
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                       579                (73,720)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.01                  (1.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01                  (1.50)


</TABLE>
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WALTER BURNS,

 Plaintiff,

 and

ALICE BURNS,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

FIRST AMERICAN TRUSTEE

SERVICING SOLUTIONS LLP; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 11-16106

D.C. No. 4:11-cv-00023-CW

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Claudia A. Wilken, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 26, 2012** 

Before: SCHROEDER, HAWKINS, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

FILED

JUN 29 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-16106

Alice Burns appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing her

action arising out of foreclosure proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28

U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Thompson v. Davis, 295 F.3d 890, 895 (9th

Cir. 2002) (per curiam), and we affirm.

The district court properly concluded that Burns’ mortgage contract did not

subject Burns to involuntary servitude and properly dismissed Burns’ claims

premised on this servitude theory. See United States v. Kozminski, 487 U.S. 931,

943 (1988) (involuntary servitude is established when a “victim had no available

choice but to work or be subject to legal sanction”); see also Cafasso v. Gen.

Dynamics C4 Sys., 637 F.3d 1047, 1054 (9th Cir. 2011) (“In reviewing the

dismissal of a complaint, we inquire whether the complaint’s factual allegations,

together with all reasonable inferences, state a plausible claim for relief.”). 

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued

in the opening brief, nor matters raised for the first time on appeal. See Padgett v.

Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009) (per curiam).

We lack jurisdiction to review the district court’s order denying Burns’

motion for reconsideration because Burns failed to file an amended notice of

appeal from that order. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4)(B)(ii).
3 11-16106

Burns’ remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

Finally, Burns’ motion to certify the matter to the United States Supreme

Court is denied.

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TECHNISOURCE,
INC.'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           8,892,813
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,679,311
<ALLOWANCES>                                       961,466
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                40,494,849
<PP&E>                                           5,587,195
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,032,523
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  49,813,186
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,340,810
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           103,850
<OTHER-SE>                                      49,709,336
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    49,813,186
<SALES>                                         67,978,643
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                67,978,643
<CGS>                                           49,350,721
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   49,350,721
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,253,335
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 174,746
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,610,398
<INCOME-TAX>                                       676,369
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                934,029
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       934,029
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.06


</TABLE>