Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 7, 1995 / Notices 12549

County, New Jersey. Texas Eastern

states that the proposed tube will

increase the maximum delivery capacity

of M&R 128 by up to 70,000 dekatherms

per day of natural gas deliveries to

Public Service Electric and Gas

Company (PSE&G), an existing

customer. Texas Eastern states that the

costs of the proposed meter tube would

be $60,000, which Texas Eastern would

pay and waive the reimbursement by

PSE&G.

Comment date: April 14, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph G

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs

F. Any person desiring to be heard or

to make any protest with reference to

said application should on or before the

comment date, file with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission,

Washington, DC 20426, a motion to

intervene or a protest in accordance

with the requirements of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211)

and the Regulations under the Natural

Gas Act (18 CFR 157.10). All protests

filed with the Commission will be

considered by it in determining the

appropriate action to be taken but will

not serve to make the protestants parties

to the proceeding. Any person wishing

to become a party to a proceeding or to

participate as a party in any hearing

therein must file a motion to intervene

in accordance with the Commission’s

Rules.

Take further notice that, pursuant to

the authority contained in and subject to

the jurisdiction conferred upon the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

by Sections 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas

Act and the Commission’s Rules of

Practice and Procedure, a hearing will

be held without further notice before the

Commission or its designee on this

application if no motion to intervene is

filed within the time required herein, if

the Commission on its own review of

the matter finds that a grant of the

certificate and/or permission and

approval for the proposed abandonment

are required by the public convenience

and necessity. If a motion for leave to

intervene is timely filed, or if the

Commission on its own motion believes

that a formal hearing is required, further

notice of such hearing will be duly

given.

Under the procedure herein provided

for, unless otherwise advised, it will be

unnecessary for applicant to appear or

be represented at the hearing.

G. Any person or the Commission’s

staff may, within 45 days after issuance

of the instant notice by the Commission,

file pursuant to Rule 214 of the

Commission’s Procedural Rules (18 CFR

385.214) a motion to intervene or notice

of intervention and pursuant to Section

157.205 of the Regulations under the

Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a

protest to the request. If no protest is

filed within the time allowed therefor,

the proposed activity shall be deemed to

be authorized effective the day after the

time allowed for filing a protest. If a

protest is filed and not withdrawn

within 30 days after the time allowed

for filing a protest, the instant request

shall be treated as an application for

authorization pursuant to Section 7 of

the Natural Gas Act.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–5500 Filed 3–6–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

[Docket No. RP95–60–001]

Alabama-Tennessee Natural Gas

Company; Refund Report

March 1, 1995.

Take notice that Alabama-Tennessee

Natural Gas Company (AlabamaTennessee) on January 10, 1995,

tendered for filing with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission

(Commission) a report summarizing

refunds disbursed on August 8, 1994,

pursuant to the Commission-approved

settlement in Docket No. RP92–237, et

al. Alabama-Tennessee states that the

refunds were disbursed by means of a

credit to each customer’s respective

OBA imbalance amount existing at the

time of the credit.

All parties that have already filed

comments or protests regarding the

subject refund need not file in response

to this notice.

Any person desiring to protest said

filing should file a protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street, NE.,

Washington, DC 20426, in accordance

with Rule 211 of the Commission’s

Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR

385.211). All such protests should be

filed on or before March 8, 1995.

Protests will be considered by the

Commission in determining the

appropriate action to be taken, but will

not serve to make protestants parties to

the proceeding. Copies of this filing are

on file with the Commission and are

available for public inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–5471 Filed 3–6–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. GT95-24-000]

Colorado Interstate Gas Company;

Filing of Refund Report

March 1, 1995.

Take notice that on February 24, 1995,

Colorado Interstate Gas Company (CIG),

filed a refund report in Docket Nos.

GP83–11, RI 83–9, et al. CIG states that

the filing and refunds were made to

comply with the Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission’s (Commission)

Orders or December 1, 1993 and May

19, 1994. CIG states that these amounts

were paid by CIG on December 14, 1994.

CIG states that the refund report

summarizes the Kansas ad valorem tax

refund amounts related to tax bills

rendered for production on or after June

28, 1988 pursuant to the Commission’s

December 1, 1993 and May 19, 1994

Orders. Lump-sum cash refunds were

made by CIG to its former jurisdictional

sales customers within 30 days of

receipt from the producers. As provided

for in the Orders, no additional interest

was required to be paid.

CIG states that copies of CIG’s filing

have been served on CIG’s former

jurisdictional sales customers,

interested state commissions, and all

parties to the proceedings.

Any person desiring to protest said

filing should file a protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capital Street, N.E.,

Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance

with Rule 211 of the Commission’s

Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR

Section 385.211). All such protests

should be filed on or before March 8,

1995. Protests will be considered by the

Commission in determining the

appropriate action to be taken, but will

not serve to make protestants parties to

the proceeding. Copies of this filing are

on file with the Commission and are

available for public inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–5469 Filed 3–6–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. RP92–133–004 (Phase I)]

Gas Research Institute; Petition to

Continue the Current Funding

Mechanism Through 1997

March 1, 1995.

Take notice that on February 27, 1995,

Gas Research Institute (GRI), filed a

petition requesting expedited approval

of its proposal to continue the current

funding mechanism for purposes of

1996 and 1997 GRI funding.

GRI proposes that the provisions of

the post-1993 funding mechanism,