alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
4.24.1
 
 **Generex
Biotechnology Corporation**
 33
Harbour Square, Suite 202
 Toronto,
Ontario
 Canada
M5J 2G2
 
  June 7,
2005
 
 **Omicron
Master Trust**
 650
5 th Ave.,
24 th Floor
 New York,
New York
 USA
10019
 
 
 Dear
Sirs:
 
 ***Re:***  ***Generex
Biotechnology Corporation***
 ***-
Promissory Note & Agreement dated April 4, 2005***
 
 We make
reference to the Promissory Note & Agreement (the “ Note ”) dated
April 4, 2005 in the principal amount of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000)
executed and delivered by Generex Biotechnology Corporation (the “ Borrower ”) in
favour of Omicron Master Trust (the “ Holder ”).
 
 We hereby
confirm the mutual agreement of the Borrower and the Holder to amend the terms
of the Note by extending the interest payment date and the maturity date thereof
from May 15, 2005 to **July
22, 2005** .
 
 We hereby
further confirm that, in consideration for the Holder’s agreement to the
foregoing amendment of the Note, the Borrower will forthwith issue to the Holder
a warrant (the “ Amendment
Warrant ”) to
purchase an aggregate of 243,902 shares of the Borrower’s common stock (the
“ Amendment
Warrant Shares ”) at a
per-share price of Eighty Two Cents ($0.82), such warrant to expire on June 7,
2010.
 
 From and
after the date hereof, the term “ Warrant ” in the
Note will be deemed to include the Amendment Warrant, and the term “ Warrant
Shares ” in the
Note will be deemed to include the Amendment Warrant Shares.
 
 *continued*
  
  
 In all
other respects, the Note will remain in full force and effect and
unamended.
 
 Yours
truly,
 
 **Generex
Biotechnology Corporation**
 
 
 /s/ Rose
C. Perri
 ____________________________________
 Rose C.
Perri
 Chief
Financial Officer
 
 ***AGREED.***
 
 **Omicron
Master Trust**
 
 
 /s/ Bruce
Bernstein
 ____________________________________
 Bruce
Bernstein
 Managing
Partner
 
 2
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3508

JLG Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-1634

Xylem, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
## (j%4)d%~ fitf ctAplvue, *V7 J^eceM^SL^SolV MREIVED IN O ^ , Jfc, v .>,,,„ / \ COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS 

### U)£tM*UX-H% M&o¥ M°52015 £X ?^ "KuUfo Ot&O :C Abe. Acosta, CtooadL 

### %i??0 ^?aX2Z^ 

### ^.&!!U M 

### auc(\orcx (\aiU^Ma^ 

# \Aoi?cWf
Qv^^LoTol c-d3£fiZ
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 50 (Wednesday, March 15, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 13999]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6397]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of a Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
Heart, Lung, and Blood Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meeting:

    Name of SEP: Mechanisms of Post Bone Marrow Transplantation Lung 
Injury.
    Date: April 5-6, 1995.
    Time: 7:30 p.m.
    Place: Holiday Inn, Chevy Chase, Maryland.
    Contact Person: Dr. Lynn M. Amende, 5333 Westbard Avenue, Room 
5A10, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, (301) 594-7480.
    Purpose/Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.

    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in sec. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. Applications 
and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable material and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the applications 
and/or proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Programs Nos. 93.837, Heart 
and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; and 
93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes 
of Health.)

    Dated: March 9, 1995.
Margery G. Grubb,
Senior Committee Management Specialist, NIH.
[FR Doc. 95-6397 Filed 3-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-1997

Brooks Instrument LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXHIBIT 11
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

The Company has computed and presented  earnings per share ("EPS") in accordance
with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128.  Reconciliation of the
numerators and the  denominators of the basic and diluted per share  computation
for net income are as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                     (unaudited)
                                                                Income        Shares       Per-Share
                                                              (Numerator)  (Denominator)
                                                              --------------------------
<S>                                                            <C>           <C>            <C>
Amount
------
Three months ended March 31, 2009
   Basic EPS
      Net income and income available to common shareholders   $1,081,175    1,685,861
      Less:
         Preferred stock dividend                                  14,693            0
                                                               ----------   ----------
         Net income available to common shareholders            1,066,482    1,685,861      $   .63
      Effect of dilutive securities, options                            0            0
                                                               ----------   ----------
   Diluted EPS
      Income available to common shareholders and assumed
         conversions                                           $1,066,482    1,685,861      $   .63
                                                               ==========   ==========

Three months ended March 31, 2008
   Basic EPS
      Net income and income available to common shareholders   $1,080,934    1,685,021      $   .64
      Effect of dilutive securities, options                            0            0
                                                               ----------   ----------
   Diluted EPS
      Income available to common shareholders and assumed
         conversions                                           $1,080,934    1,685,021      $   .64
                                                               ==========   ==========
</TABLE>




                                       22
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3407

CW Bearing USA, Inc:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Exhibit 23.2





CONSENT OF


INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of Ener1, Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-148980, 333-112583 and 333-112581) and S-3 (File Nos. 333-156609, 333-170470 and 333-172169) of our report dated March 12, 2009 as updated on January 19, 2010 with respect to the audited consolidated financial statements of Ener1, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2008.





/s/ MaloneBailey, LLP


www.malonebailey.com


Houston, Texas





March 10, 2011
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 55 (Wednesday, March 22, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 15049]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6954]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[CGD01-95-016]


Special Local Regulations: The Great Kennebec River Whatever 
Race, Augusta, ME

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of implementation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice puts into effect the permanent regulations, 33 CFR 
100.108, for the Great Kennebec River Whatever Race. The regulation 
will be effective Sunday, July 2, 1995 from 6 a.m. until 6 p.m. This 
regulation is necessary to control vessel traffic due to the confined 
nature of the waterway and anticipated congestion at the time of the 
event. The purpose of this regulation is to provide for the safety of 
life and property during the event.

EFFECTIVE DATE: The regulations in 33 CFR 100.108 are effective from 6 
a.m. to 6 p.m. on Sunday, July 2, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lieutenant (Junior Grade) B.M. Algeo, 
Chief, Boating Affairs Branch, First Coast Guard District, (617) 223-
8311.

    Drafting Information: The principal persons involved in drafting 
this document are LTJG B.M. Algeo, Project Manager, First Coast 
Guard District Boating Safety Division, and LCDR S.R. Watkins, 
Project Attorney, First Coast Guard District Legal Office.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice provides the effective period 
for the permanent regulation governing the 1995 running of the Great 
Kennebec River Whatever Race, Maine. A portion of the Kennebec River 
will be closed during the effective period to all vessel traffic except 
participants, official regatta vessels, and patrol craft. The regulated 
area is that portion of the Kennebec River, extending bank to bank, 
between the Maine Route 126 bridge to the U.S. Route 201-202 bridge. 
Additional public notification will be made via the First Coast Guard 
District Local Notice to Mariners and marine safety broadcasts. The 
full text of this regulation is found in 33 CFR 100.108.

    Dated: March 8, 1995.
J.L. Linnon,
Rear Admiral, Coast Guard, Commander, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 95-6954 Filed 3-21-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-14-M
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-3411

_____________________________

JEREMIAH BENJAMIN STANLEY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Walton County.

Kelvin C. Wells, Judge.

October 23, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WETHERELL, ROWE, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Robin B. Rogers, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO

. 09

- 11

- 00180

- CR



### ____________________

CULLEN ASHTON TODD

, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On A ppeal from the 221st District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No

. 10

- 05

- 04679

- CR

________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON REHEARING

In one of his issues o n motion for rehearing, Cullen Ashton Todd contends

his guilty plea was involuntary because the trial court stated the improper

punishment range in the oral admonishment during the plea hearing

. He did not

present this argument to this Court in his brief o n appeal. More over , he did not

present this claim to the trial court in his application for writ of habeas corpus

.

Todd’s stated ground for habeas relief was ineffective assistance of counsel due to

trial counsel’s failure to adequately investigate the value of the property before2 Todd accepted the plea bargain for a guilty plea to a state jail felony

. Accordingly,

Todd failed to preserve the oral admonishment issue throug h his habeas

application. See Tex. R. App. P. 33.1.

Todd failed to challenge the validity of his guilty plea in a direct appeal

w hen the trial court deferred adjudication of guilt. See Dillehey v. State

, 815

S.W.2d 623, 62 6 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991 ). Todd di d eventually dispute the

accuracy of the oral admonishment in a motion to withdraw his guilty plea , but he

filed the motion during revocation proceedings that occurred after the trial court

considered and ruled on Todd’s habeas petition

. He cannot chal lenge the validity

of his plea i n the appeal of the adjudication following revocation of community

supervision. See Manuel v. State , 994 S.W.2d 658 , 661

- 62 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999).

We overrule appellant’s motion for rehearing.

MOTION FOR REHEARING OVERRULED.

________________________________ STEVE McKEITHEN

Chief Justice

Opinion Delivered May 15, 2013

D o Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton , JJ.
#### Cecil POYNER *v.*ARKANSAS CONTRACTORS LICENSING BOARD

98-952

979 S.W.2d 902

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered November 19, 1998

*Lyon, Emerson & Cone,*for appellant.

No response.

Per Curiam.

On August 5, 1998, Cecil Poyner, by his attorneys, Lyon, Emerson & Cone, filed a petition for writ of certiorari to complete the record. By *per curiam*dated September 17, 1998, appellant’s petition for writ of certiorari was granted. The writ of certiorari was issued to the Clerk and Court Reporter of the Pulaski County Circuit Court, Third Division, returnable on October 17, 1998. A copy of the *per curiam*was served on Lene Collins-Sontag by the Arkansas State Police on October 27, 1998. Leñé Collins-Sontag was directed to respond to the Arkansas Supreme Court Clerk’s Office within seven days of the service of the *per curiam,*and to advise him of plans to proceed in accordance with the *per curiam.*She was further advised that failure to do so would result in her being ordered to appear before the Arkansas Supreme Court to show cause why she should not be held in contempt of court for failing to comply with the court’s previous order. No response has been received by the supreme court clerk.

Therefore, Leñé Collins-Sontag is ordered to appear before this court on the 10th day of December, 1998, at 9:00 a.m., *261to show cause why she should not be held in contempt of this court for her failure to comply in a timely manner with the command of the writ of certiorari issued on September 17, 1997.

LENÉ COLLINS-SONTAG IS FURTHER NOTIFIED THAT HER FAILURE TO APPEAR ON DECEMBER 10, 1998, COULD RESULT IN THE ISSUANCE OF A BENCH WARRANT FOR HER ARREST WITH DIRECTIONS TO THE APPROPRIATE LAW ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITY TO ARRANGE FOR HER DELIVERY TO THIS COURT SO A SHOW-CAUSE HEARING CAN BE CONDUCTED AT THE EARLIEST POSSIBLE DATE.
Exhibit 32.2


                           GREG MANNING AUCTIONS, INC.
                  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

In connection with this report on Form 10-K of Greg Manning Auctions, Inc. for
the year ended June 30, 2005, I, Larry Crawford, Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of Greg Manning Auctions, Inc., hereby certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

     1.   this Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with
          the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in this Form 10-K for the period ended June
          30, 2005 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
          condition and results of operations of Greg Manning Auctions, Inc.

Dated:   September 15, 2005
                                        /s/ Larry Crawford
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        Larry Crawford, Executive Vice President
                                        and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1
 
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Gerard H. Sweeney

Gerard H. SweeneyPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate: August 8, 2008
 
 *
    
    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Brandywine Realty Trust and will be retained by Brandywine Realty Trust and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.