alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4249 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4249

   To create a point of order against legislation making nondefense 
 discretionary appropriations that would increase the deficit during a 
                       period of high inflation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 May 18 (legislative day, May 17), 2022

  Mr. Scott of Florida introduced the following bill; which was read 
           twice and referred to the Committee on the Budget

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To create a point of order against legislation making nondefense 
 discretionary appropriations that would increase the deficit during a 
                       period of high inflation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. POINT OF ORDER IN THE SENATE AGAINST LEGISLATION MAKING 
              NONDEFENSE DISCRETIONARY APPROPRIATIONS THAT WOULD 
              INCREASE THE DEFICIT DURING A PERIOD OF HIGH INFLATION.

    (a) Point of Order.--It shall not be in order in the Senate to 
consider any bill, joint resolution, motion, amendment, amendment 
between the Houses, or conference report making appropriations for the 
revised nonsecurity category (as defined in section 250(c) of the 
Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 
900(c))) that, if enacted, would increase the deficit over the period 
of current fiscal year, the budget year, and the ensuing 9 fiscal years 
following the budget year if the annualized change in the most recently 
monthly report on the Consumer Price Index for All-Urban Consumers 
published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the Department of Labor 
is not less than 3 percent.
    (b) Waiver and Appeal.--Subsection (a) may be waived or suspended 
in the Senate only by an affirmative vote of two-thirds of the Members, 
duly chosen and sworn. An affirmative vote of two-thirds of the Members 
of the Senate, duly chosen and sworn, shall be required to sustain an 
appeal of the ruling of the Chair on a point of order raised under 
subsection (a).
    (c) Effective Date.--This section shall apply on and after July 1, 
2022.
                                 <all>
```
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

April 12, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3723

ECM Industries LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_04.15.19.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
#### E. E. EARP v. HILL YARBOROUGH.

(Filed 4 November, 1931.)

(For digest see *Allen v. Yarborough,*next preceding case, p. 568.)

Appeal by defendant from *MacRae, Special Judge,*at June Term, 1931, of Duki-iam. New trial.

*W. H. Yarborough for appellant.*

*W. L. Foushee for appellee.*

Adams, J.

The disposition of the present appeal is controlled by the decision in *Allen v. Yarborough, ante,*568.

New trial.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                     EXHIBIT 11

                        PHYCOR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

            Statement Regarding Computation of Earnings Per Share
   (all amounts are expressed in thousands, except for earnings per share)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      1996     1995       1994
                                                    -------   -------   -------
<S>                                                 <C>       <C>       <C>
Earnings per common share:
    Net income (in thousands)                       $36,380    7,140     11,675
                                                    =======  =======    =======

    Weighted average common shares outstanding       61,096   17,247     24,219
                                                    =======  =======    =======

    Earnings per share                              $   .60     0.41       0.48
                                                    =======  =======    =======

Earnings per common share, assuming full dilution:
    Net income (in thousands)                                           $11,675
    Interest on subordinated debentures                                   2,121
                                                                        -------

    Adjusted net income (in thousands)                                  $13,796
                                                                        =======

    Weighted average common shares outstanding                           28,952
                                                                        =======

    Earnings per share                                                  $  0.47
                                                                        =======
</TABLE>


Note:  The convertible debentures were not included in the calculation of the
       fully diluted earnings per share calculation since the effect of
       inclusion would be antidilutive.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-40783

Summary Calendar

 

CALVIN RAY HYDER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JAMES A. COLLINS, DIRECTOR, 

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 

INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; 

WAYNE SCOTT, DIRECTOR, 

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 

INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-96-CV-175

- - - - - - - - - -

April 11, 1997

Before SMITH, DUHE’ and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Calvin Ray Hyder’s, Texas prisoner # 458495, motion to

proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is GRANTED. We assess no

initial partial filing fee; however, we direct the agency having

custody of Hyder to forward payments from his account to the

clerk of the district court each time the amount in his account
No. 96-40783

- 2 -

exceeds $10 until the filing fee in the amount of $105 is paid. 

See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2) and (4).

Our review of the briefs and the record lead us to conclude

that the district court did not abuse its discretion in

dismissing Hyder’s civil rights action with prejudice for failure

to prosecute pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Further, Hyder’s

appeal is without arguable merit and thus frivolous. See Howard

v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the

appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 54 (Tuesday, March 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 14932]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6956]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Science Board Task Force on Combat Identification

ACTION: Notice of advisory committee meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board Task Force on Combat Identification 
will meet in closed session on April 18-19, May 9-10, and June 13-14, 
1995 at the MITRE Corporation, Bedford, Massachusetts.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense through the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition and 
Technology) on scientific and technical matters as they affect the 
perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At these meetings the 
Task Force will evaluate the DoD long term strategy and plan for 
development and fielding of a comprehensive situational awareness (SA) 
and combat identification (CID) architecture.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, P.L. No. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II, (1988)), it has 
been determined that these DSB Task Force meetings, concern matters 
listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) (1988), and that accordingly these 
meetings will be closed to the public.

    Dated: March 16, 1995.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 95-6956 Filed 3-20-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0127

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

CHRISTOPHER ROBIN LEDEAU,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including October 2, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 24 2023

08/24/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0127
Exhibit 32.1
 
 
 Certification of CEO Pursuant to
 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 as Adopted Pursuant to
 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of GAMCO Investors, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Mario J. Gabelli, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:
 
 (1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/ Mario J. Gabelli
 Name: Mario J. Gabelli
 Title:   Chief Executive Officer
 Date:   May 6, 2010
 
 This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Model Number: CCT2000

Countertop Water Filtration System

Docket Number: USTR-2018-0025: Exclusion Request for Water Filtration Products (HTS 8421.21.0000)

PRODUCT SUBMISSIONS:

Individual DIM: 6" x 5.25" x "
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4395 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4395

    To allow grantees under the HIV Health Care Services Program to 
allocate a portion of such funding for services to individuals at risk 
                           of acquiring HIV.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 14, 2022

    Mr. Scott of Florida (for himself and Mr. Lujan) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                 Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To allow grantees under the HIV Health Care Services Program to 
allocate a portion of such funding for services to individuals at risk 
                           of acquiring HIV.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ryan White PrEP Availability Act''.

SEC. 2. SERVICES FOR INDIVIDUALS AT RISK OF ACQUIRING HIV.

    Title XXVI of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300ff-11 et 
seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:

      ``PART H--SERVICES FOR INDIVIDUALS AT RISK OF ACQUIRING HIV

``SEC. 2696. INDIVIDUALS AT RISK OF ACQUIRING HIV.

    ``(a) In General.--Any eligible area, State, or public or private 
nonprofit entity that receives a grant under part A, B, C, or D may use 
program income received from such a grant to provide to individuals who 
are at risk of acquiring HIV--
            ``(1) drugs and biological products for pre-exposure 
        prophylaxis (PrEP) prescribed by a professional who is 
        authorized under State or other applicable law to write 
        prescriptions, consistent with Federal guidelines issued by the 
        Centers for Disease Control and Prevention;
            ``(2) medical, laboratory, and counseling services related 
        to such drugs and biological products; and
            ``(3) referrals and linkages to appropriate services for 
        the prevention of HIV, as prescribed to eligible individuals 
        who are at risk of acquiring HIV.
    ``(b) Voluntary Program.--Nothing in this section shall be 
construed to permit any eligible area, State, or public or private 
nonprofit entity to allocate any grant funds received under this title 
for the purposes described in paragraph (1) or (2) of subsection 
(a).''.
                                 <all>
```
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.



# United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1180 SHIRE LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. SANDOZ, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado in

case no. 07-CV-00197, Judge Philip A. Brimmer.

ON MOTION Before MAYER Circuit Judge. ORDER IXYS Corporation and EML Technologies, LLC move for leave to file a brief amicus curiae in support of Shire LLC. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. FOR THE COURT 

# JUL 2 9 2009 /s/ Jan Horbalv Date Jan Horbaly Clerk cc: Keith D. Parr, Esq. 

### FILE U.S. COURT OF Edward H. Haug, Esq. THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT R. Carl Moy, Esq. Sharon A. Israel, Esq. JUL 2 9 2009 JAN HORBALY CLERKRoger Cook, Esq.

Charles A. Weiss, Esq. Kevin P. Martin, Esq. s19

2009-1180 2
<PAGE>
                                                                  EXHIBIT 23 (1)

                          Consent of Ernst & Young LLP

We consent to the incorporation by reference in: (1) the Registration Statement
(Form S-3 No. 333-14463) of ShoLodge, Inc. and in the related Prospectus; (2)
the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-52092) pertaining to the 1991 Stock
Option Plan of ShoLodge, Inc.; (3) the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
333-29881) pertaining to the 1991 Stock Option Plan, as amended, of ShoLodge,
Inc.; and (4) the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 33-77910) of ShoLodge,
Inc. and in the related Prospectus, of our report dated April 11, 2003, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of ShoLodge, Inc.
and subsidiaries included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 29, 2002.



                                       /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Nashville, Tennessee
April 11, 2003
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT B R UNO LEAL B ORR

AS, Pe titione r, v. ER IC H. HOLDER , Jr., Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde n t . No. 11-70599 Age n c y No. A093-454-125 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d Se pte m

be r 23, 2014 * * B e fore : W . FLETC HER , R AW LINSON, a

n d C HR ISTEN, C irc uit Judge s. B runo Le a l B orra s, a nat ive and c itiz e n of B ra z il, pe titions for re vie w of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a l s’ (“ B IA” ) orde r dism issing his a ppe a l from an im m igration judge ’ s de c i sion de ny i ng his a pplic at ion for a s y lum , withholding of re m ova l, a

nd prote c tion unde r the C onve ntion Aga i nst Torture (“ C AT” ). Our 

# F IL ED OCT 01 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a )(2).jurisdic tion is governe d by 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e dism i ss in pa rt a nd de ny in pa rt the p e tition for re v i e w. W e la c k jurisdic tion to c onside r B orra s’ s a sy lum and C AT c la i m s be c a

use he fa ile d to ra ise the m

to the B IA. Se e Barron v . Ashc roft , 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th C ir. 2004). The B IA found tha

t, e ve n if B o rra s de m onstra te d m e m be rship in a

pa rtic ula r soc i a l group, hefa ile d to e sta blish his me m

be rship in thepa

rtic ula r soc ia l group wa s or will bea

“ c e ntra l re a son” for the ha rm he suffe re d or fe ars. B orra s doe s not ra ise any argum e nts c ha lle nging this dete rm inat ion in his ope ning brie f. S

e e Martine z -Se rrano v . IN

S , 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th C ir. 1996) (issue s whic h a re not spe c ific a lly

and distinc tly

ra ise d a nd a rgue d in a pa

rty 's ope ning brie f are wa ive d). Thus, B orra s’ s withholding of re m ova l c la im

fa ils. PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDISM ISSE D in par t; DE NIE D in par t.

1 1 - 7 0 5 9 9 2
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Shoe Carnival, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ending February 1, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark L. Lemond,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

/s/ Mark L. Lemond
President and
Chief Executive Officer
May 1, 2003




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Shoe Carnival, Inc. and will be retained by Shoe Carnival, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-2684

HP Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 55 (Wednesday, March 22, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15171-15172]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6758]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET

Rescission of OMB Circulars

AGENCY: Office of Management and Budget.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rescission of OMB Circular A-105 ``Standard 
Federal Regions''.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that OMB intends to rescind Circular 
No.  A-105, ``Standard Federal Regions.'' The current circular 
establishes ten standard Federal regions, uniform regional boundaries 
and common regional office headquarter locations for all Federal 
domestic agencies. The circular also provides guidelines for 
establishing or realigning field structures, regional offices, and 
subregional offices. Circular A-105 is being proposed for rescission 
because changes in the way the Federal Government manages resources; 
agency efforts to reduce duplicative levels of management and 
oversight; and expanded use of technology to interact with the public 
makes a strict regional structure inefficient and unnecessary.

DATES: Persons who wish to comment on the proposed rescission of 
Circular No. A-105 should submit their comments no later than April 24, 
1995. The rescission will take place June 8, 1995, unless the comments 
raise significant concerns regarding the proposed rescission.

[[Page 15172]] ADDRESSES: Comments should be addressed to: Steve 
Mertens, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office 
Building, 725 17th Street, NW, Room 9002, Washington, D.C. 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
For further information on the proposed rescission of Circular No. A-
105, contact Steve Mertens on (202)  395-4935. For further information 
on OMB's overall review of its circulars, contact Frank J. Seidl, III, 
Staff Assistant, on (202) 395-5146; or Rosalyn J. Rettman, Associate 
General Counsel for Budget on (202) 395-5000.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Director of the Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB) has initiated a systematic review of all OMB circulars, in 
an effort to reduce unnecessary Government directives. As part of this 
initiative, each OMB circular is being reviewed to see whether it 
should be rescinded or whether its requirements can be simplified.

    Dated: March 10, 1995.
John B. Arthur,
Associate Director for Administration.
[FR Doc. 95-6758 Filed 3-21-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3110-01-M