alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 47 (Friday, March 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 13141]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5888]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. TM95-2-37-000]


Northwest Pipeline Corporation; Proposed Change in FERC Gas 
Tariff

March 6, 1995.
    Take notice that on March 1, 1995, Northwest Pipeline Corporation 
(Northwest) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff the 
following tariff sheets and a proposed effective date of April 1, 1995:

Third Revised Volume No. 1

Third Revised Sheet No. 14

Original Volume No. 2

Thirteenth Revised Sheet No. 2.1

    Northwest states that the purpose of this filing is to implement 
new fuel use requirements factors (Factors) for Northwest's 
transportation and storage rate schedules. The Factors are determined 
each year to become effective April 1 pursuant to Section 14.12 of the 
General Terms and Conditions contained in Northwest's FERC Gas Tariff, 
Third Revised Volume No. 1, and pursuant to Section 5 of Sheet No. 2.1 
in Northwest's FERC GAs Tariff, Original Volume No. 2.
    Northwest states that coincidental with the submission of this 
filing Northwest is submitting another superseding filing with the same 
proposed effective date of April 1, 1995 to propose changes to the 
methodology for calculating the Factors. Northwest states that the 
changes will provide Northwest with a mechanism to recover certain 
costs related to its investments necessary to maintain gas supplies to 
replace lost and unaccounted-for volumes.
    Northwest states that a copy of this filing has been served upon 
Northwest's jurisdictional customers and upon relevant state regulatory 
commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or protest said filing should file 
a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Practice and Procedure. All such motions or protests should be 
filed on or before March 13, 1995. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person 
wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of 
this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-5888 Filed 3-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
 THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET DATED DEC.31, 1998 AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE TWELVE MONTH
PERIOD ENDING DEC. 31, 1998 FOUND ON PAGES 20 AND 21 OF THE COMPANY'S 10-KSB/A1
FOR 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRITY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000882692
<NAME>                        Midisoft Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             270
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      428
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (245)
<INVENTORY>                                        115
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   610
<PP&E>                                           1,047
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (930)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     977
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,803
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        20,167
<OTHER-SE>                                     (23,332)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       977
<SALES>                                          1,760
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,760
<CGS>                                              672
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,680
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    20
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,565
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4,160)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (4,160)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (4,160)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.64) <F1>
        
<FN>
COMMON STOCK EQUIVALENTS NOT INCLUDED, AS IT WOULD BE ANTI-DILUTIVE.
</FN>

</TABLE>
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Wind Erosion and Water Conservation Research: Lubbock, TX
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Lubbock, Texas Cropping Systems Research Laboratory Wind Erosion and Water Conservation Research Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Research Projects Subjects of Investigation at this LocationEach ARS research project has related subjects of investigation.  Listed below are the subjects of investigation currently conducted at this location.
Clicking on a subject of investigation will list the research projects within that  subject of investigation.Subjects of Investigation
                            Climate
                                Cross-commodity research--multiple crops
                                Soil
                                **Upland cotton**
                                Water resources

                    Research Projects within Upland cotton
                            item
                                            Developing Strategies for Resilient and Sustainable Crop, Water, and Soil Management in Semi-Arid Environments


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Unassociated Document


Exhibit 10.1


 


Translation of Independent Director Appointment Agreement


 


Party A:


 


China Education Alliance, Inc.


 


Chairman: Mr. Xiqun Yu


 


Party B:


 


Mr. Xiaohua Gu


 


ID No. 310108197305134458


 


Telephone No. 18621686173


 


In view of


 



	
  

	
1.

	
Party A is a NYSE-listed company and is required to have independent directors on its board of directors;







 



	
  

	
2.

	
One of Party A’s former director left office upon expiration of his term;







 



	
  

	
3.

	
Party A fully recognizes Party B’s professional experience and Party B is willing to serve as an independent director for Party A.







 


The parties hereby enter into the following agreement upon friendly mutual consultation.


 



	
1.

	
Appointment and Term of Service







 



	
  

	
1.1.

	
Party A appoints Party B to serve as its independent director.







 



	
  

	
1.2.

	
Term of service is three years, starting from June 30, 2011.







 



	
2.

	
Representations and Warranties of Party B







 



	
  

	
2.1.

	
Party B is a citizen of the People’s Republic of China.







 



	
  

	
2.2.

	
The content on the resume Party B presents to Party A is true and valid.







 



	
  

	
2.3.

	
No conditions will disqualify Party B from serving as an independent director for a United States public company.







 



	
3.

	
Responsibilities of Party B







 


As an independent director for Party A, Party B shall primarily perform the following responsibilities:


 



	
  

	
3.1.

	
Attend board meetings and other important meetings timely and perform the duties of an independent director.







 



	
  

	
3.2.

	
Other responsibilities of an independent director.







 



	
4.

	
Compensation of Party B







 



	
  

	
4.1.

	
The compensation for Party B is $15,000 each year, with monthly payment to be made on the fifth day of each month.







 



	
  

	
4.2.

	
Party A shall grant to Party B options to purchase 30,000 shares of common stock of the Company. An option to purchase 10,000 shares shall be granted each year during the term of service.







 




  





  











  






 



	
5.

	
Liability for Breach







 



	
  

	
5.1.

	
During the term of this agreement, either party that terminates the agreement unilaterally or fails to perform the obligations stipulated in the agreement shall pay the non-breaching party a liquidated damage of $20,000.







 



	
  

	
5.2.

	
Both parties shall consult with each other on any disputes arising out of the signing or performance of the agreement. If the disputes cannot be resolved to the satisfaction of both parties, either party can sue in the court.







 



	
6.

	
Miscellaneous







 



	
  

	
6.1.

	
The agreement becomes effective upon signing by both parties.







 



	
  

	
6.2.

	
The agreement has four copies, with two copies to each party.







 


Party A:


 


China Education Alliance, Inc.


 


/s/Xiqun Yu


 


Chairman: Xiqun Yu


 


Date: June 30, 2011


 







Party B:


 


/s/Xiaohua Gu


 


Xiaohua Gu


 


Date: June 30, 2011
Exhibit 32
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Operating Partnership for the
period ended March 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m); and2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Operating Partnership.
  /S/ Robert J. AtteaRobert J. AtteaChairman of the Board
Chief Executive Officer of Sovran Holdings, Inc., the Sole General Partner of the Operating Partnership/S/ David L. RogersDavid L. RogersChief Financial Officer of Sovran Holdings, Inc., the Sole General Partner of the Operating Partnership
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 45 (Wednesday, March 8, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 12823]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5818]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS


Operations and Regulations Committee Meeting

TIME AND DATE: The Legal Services Corporation Board of Directors 
Operations and Regulations Committee will meet on March 17, 1995. The 
meeting will commence at 1:30 p.m.

PLACE: Legal Services Corporation, 750 1st Street, N.E., The Board 
Room, Washington, D.C. 20002, (202) 336-8800.

STATUS OF MEETING: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Open Session

    1. Approval of Agenda.
    2. Approval of Minutes of February 17, 1995 Meetings.
    3. Consider and Act Proposed Changes to the Corporation's 
Bylaws.
    4. Consider and Act on Proposed Board Disclosure Form and 
Related Guidelines.
    5. Consider Committee's Oversight Responsibilities for Corporate 
Operations.
    6. Consider and Act on Other Business.

CONTACT PERSON FOR INFORMATION: Patricia Batie, (202) 336-8800.
    Upon request, meeting notices will be made available in alternate 
formats to accommodate visual and hearing impairments.
    Individuals who have a disability and need an accommodation to 
attend the meeting may notify Patricia Batie at (202) 336-8800.

    Date Issued: March 6, 1995.
Patricia D. Batie,
Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-5818 Filed 3-6-95; 1:41 pm]
BILLING CODE 7050-01-M
_____________ No. 95-2942WM

_____________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Western v. * District of Missouri. * Marc A. Beachem, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

_____________ Submitted: September 13, 1996 Filed: September 19, 1996

_____________ Before FAGG, LAY, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

_____________
PER CURIAM.
After drug enforcement agents observed Marc A. Beachem receiving a sack of powdered cocaine and cocaine base from a drug courier named Michae l Leroy, Beachem pleaded guilty to attempting to p ossess cocaine with intent to distribute, see 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846 (1994). Beachem appeals th e ninety-seven month sentence imposed by the distr ict court. First, Beachem contends the district court erroneously held him accountable for the 43.4 grams of cocaine base Leroy delivered to him. Beachem argues he did not know and could not reasonably foresee that the s ack he received from Leroy contained cocaine base, because Leroy had never brought Beachem any cocain e base during earlier drug deliveries. See U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3(a)(1)(B) (1994)
. We conclude the district court did not commit clear error in finding the delivery of cocaine b ase was reasonably foreseeable, because the district court heard evidence that Leroy and Beachem's regular supplier cooke d cocaine into cocaine base, Beachem communicated with the supplier before

### -2-

each delivery, Beachem knew the types and amounts of drugs Leroy wa s bringing during past deliveries, and Beachem once sold cocaine base to an undercover informant. See United States v. Flores , 73 F.3d 826, 833 (8th Cir.), cert. denied , 116 S. Ct. 2568 (1996). We also reject Beachem' s contention that the district court committed clear error in calculating th e amounts of powder cocaine and marijuana attributable to Beachem based on his relev ant conduct. See United States v. Lawrence , 915 F.2d 402, 40 6 (8th Cir. 1990). The district court's calculations are supported b y statem ents Leroy made to drug enforcement agents about earlier dru g deliveries, and the district court's determinati on that Leroy was credible is virtually unreviewable on appeal. United Sta tes v. Adipietro , 983 F.2d 1468, 1472 (8th Cir. 1993). We thus affirm Beachem's sentence.
A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 13, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3637

Omega Environmental Technologies, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
EXHIBIT 32
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Salisbury  Bancorp,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending  September 30, 2006, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
John F. Perotti,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  and I, John F. Foley,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ John F. Perotti                                  /s/ John F. Foley
---------------------                                ---------------------------
    John F. Perotti                                      John F. Foley
    Chief Executive Officer                              Chief Financial Officer




24
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JEAN ERNST JOSEPH,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-3766 

[May 9, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Timothy L. Bailey, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

13009009CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Tatjana Ostapoff, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders1 appeal, we affirm the trial court’s disposition and 

sentence in appellant’s violation of probation proceeding. However, we 

remand for entry of a written order of revocation of probation specifying 

the conditions appellant was found to have violated. See Clark v. State, 

201 So. 3d 799, 799 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016). The judge specified those 

conditions on the record, but a written order is required to incorporate 

those findings. 

Affirmed and remanded with instructions. 

MAY, LEVINE and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, (1967).
2
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO SPONSOR WARRANTS PURCHASE AGREEMENT







This Amendment No. 1 (the “Amendment”), dated June 28, 2011, to that certain Sponsor Warrants Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated the 21st day of April, 2011, is made by and between Azteca Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), having its principal place of business at 421 N. Beverly Drive, Suite 300, Beverly Hills, CA 90210, and Azteca Acquisition Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Sponsor”), having its principal place of business at 421 N. Beverly Drive, Suite 300, Beverly Hills, CA 90210. All capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the same meaning ascribed to them in the Agreement.







Pursuant to Section 12.3 of the Agreement, the Company and the Sponsor hereby agree to amend the Agreement, effective on the date hereof, as follows:







1.  Amendments to the Agreement.







(a)           Recitals.  The first recital is hereby amended as follows:







The reference to 4,333,333 warrants is hereby replaced with 4,666,667 Warrants.







(b)           Section 1.1.  Section 1.1 is hereby amended as follows:







The reference to $3,250,000 Purchase Price is replaced with $3,500,000 Purchase Price.




 


2.  Mutual Drafting.  This Amendment is the joint product of the Company and the Sponsor and each provision hereof has been subject to the mutual consultation, negotiation and agreement of such parties and shall not be construed for or against any party hereto.







3.  No Other Amendments; Governing Law; Counterparts.  Except as specifically set forth in this Amendment, there are no other amendments to the Agreement and the Agreement shall remain unmodified and in full force and effect.  This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the internal laws of the State of New York.  This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts.  In the event that any signature is delivered by facsimile transmission or any other form of electronic delivery, such signature shall create a valid and binding obligation of the party executing (or on whose behalf such signature is executed) with the same force and effect as if such signature page were an original thereof.







[Signature page follows]






  





  










 









This subscription is accepted by the Company as of the date first written above.








	  	
AZTECA ACQUISITION CORPORATION


	  	  
	  	
By:

	
/s/ Gabriel Brener


	  	
Name:  Gabriel Brener


	  	
Title:  Chairman, CEO and


	  	
President













	
Accepted and agreed this

	 
	
28th day of June, 2011

	 
	  	 
	
AZTECA ACQUISITIONS HOLDINGS, LLC

	 
	  	 
	
By:

	
/s/ Gabriel Brener

	 
	
Name: Gabriel Brener

	 
	
Title: Managing Member
exh104.htm


 


 


EXHIBIT 10.4


 


RESIGNATION


 


I hereby resign as a director of MEZABAY INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Nevada corporation, (the “Company”) effectively immediately.


 


I do not have any disagreements with the Company on any matter relating to the Company’s operations, policies or practices.


 


Dated this 29th day of June 2011.


 


 


                            FAN FOO MIN


                            Fan Foo Min
3XEOLF9HUVLRQRI%&,

3803,03(//(5&$67,1*35(6685(&217$,1,1*67$,1/(6667((/



3,$==$52%(57

35,&(3803&203$1<

2WKHU

12

3XEOLF9HUVLRQRI%&,
 .*

<(6

12

 .*



,03257,1*7+,63$57)520&+,1$&2676

385&+$6,1*5$:0$7(5,$/$1'0$&+,1,1*,7'20(67,&$//<&267