Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 48 / Monday, March 13, 1995 / Notices 13445

31. To Federal, State, and local law

enforcement agencies and private

security contractors, as appropriate,

information necessary.

(a) To enable them to protect the

safety of SSA employees and customers,

the security of the SSA workplace and

the operation of SSA facilities, or

(b) To assist investigations or

prosecutions with respect to activities

that affect such safety and security or

activities that disrupt the operation of

SSA facilities.

32. Corrections to information that

resulted in erroneous inclusion of

individuals in the Death Master File

(DMF) may be disclosed to recipients of

erroneous DMF information.

POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR STORING,

RETRIEVING, ACCESSING, RETAINING, AND

DISPOSING OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM:

STORAGE:

Records in this system are maintained

in paper form (e.g., paper lists, punch

cards, Forms SS–5 (Application for an

SSN), and systems generated forms);

magnetic media (e.g., magnetic tape and

disc with on-line access); and in

microfilm and microfiche form.

RETRIEVABILITY:

Records of SSN holders are indexed

by both SSN and name. Records of

applications that have been denied

because the applicant submitted

fraudulent evidence, or that are being

verified because the evidence is

suspected to be fraudulent, are indexed

either by the applicant’s name plus

month and year of birth, or by the

applicant’s name plus the eleven-digit

reference number of the disallowed

application.

SAFEGUARDS:

Safeguards for automated records

have been established in accordance

with the Systems Security Handbook.

This includes maintaining the magnetic

tapes and discs within a secured

enclosure attended by security guards.

Anyone entering or leaving this

enclosure must have a special badge

issued only to authorized personnel.

For computerized records

electronically transmitted between

Central Office and Field Office locations

(including organizations administering

SSA programs under contractual

agreements), safeguards include a lock/

unlock password system, exclusive use

of leased telephone lines, a terminaloriented transaction matrix, and an

audit trail. All microfilm, microfiche,

and paper files are accessible only by

authorized personnel who have a need

for the records in the performance of

their official duties.

Expansion and improvement of SSA’s

telecommunications systems has

resulted in the acquisition of terminals

equipped with physical key locks. The

terminals also are fitted with adapters to

permit the future installation of data

encryption devices and devices to

permit the identification of terminal

users.

RETENTION AND DISPOSAL:

All paper forms are retained for 5

years after they have been filmed or

entered on tape and the accuracy has

been verified. They then are destroyed

by shredding. All tape, discs, microfilm,

and microfiche files are updated

periodically. Out-of-date magnetic tapes

and discs are erased. Out-of-date

microfiches are disposed of by applying

heat.

SYSTEM MANAGER AND ADDRESS:

Director, Division of Data Support and

Enumeration, Office of Systems

Requirements, Social Security

Administration, 6401 Security

Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235.

NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES:

An individual can determine if this

system contains a record pertaining to

him/her by providing his/her name,

signature, and SSN to the address

shown under ‘‘System manager and

address’’ above. (Furnishing the SSN is

voluntary, but it makes searching for an

individual’s record easier and avoids

delay.) If the SSN is unknown or no

SSN has been assigned because the

evidence presented with the application

is being verified or has been determined

to be fraudulent, the individual should

provide name, signature, date and place

of birth, sex, mother’s birth name, and

father’s name, and evidence of identity.

These procedures are in accordance

with HHS Regulations 45 CFR part 5b.

RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES:

Same as notification procedures. Also,

requesters should reasonably specify the

record contents which they are seeking.

These procedures are in accordance

with HHS Regulations 45 CFR part 5b.

CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES:

Same as notification procedures

above. Also, requesters should

reasonably identify the record, specify

the information which they are

contesting, and state the corrective

action sought and the reasons for the

correction, with supporting justification

showing how the record is incomplete,

untimely, inaccurate, or irrelevant.

These procedures are in accordance

with HHS Regulations 45 CFR part 5b.

RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES:

Information in this system is obtained

from SSN applicants (or individuals

acting on their behalf). The SSN itself is

assigned to the individual as a result of

internal processes of this system.

SYSTEM EXEMPTIONS FROM CERTAIN PROVISIONS

OF THE PRIVACY ACT:

None.

[FR Doc. 95–6104 Filed 3–10–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4190–29

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND

URBAN DEVELOPMENT

Office of the Assistant Secretary for

Public and Indian Housing

[Docket No. N–95–3870; FR–3798–C–02]

Community Development Block Grant

Program for Indian Tribes and Alaska

Native Villages; Notice of Fund

Availability; Correction of Application

Due Date

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant

Secretary for Public and Indian

Housing, HUD.

ACTION: Notice of fund availability for

fiscal year 1995; correction of

application due date.

SUMMARY: On February 24, 1995 (60 FR

10452), the Department published in the

Federal Register, a Notice of Fund

Availability that announced HUD’s

funding for the Community

Development Block Grant Program for

Indian Tribes and Alaska Native

Villages for Fiscal Year 1995. The

application due date was computed

incorrectly and ends on May 14, 1995,

which is a Sunday afternoon. This

incorrect date appears in the ‘‘DATES’’

section, and also appears on page 10464

of the February 24, 1995 notice in

paragraph II.(c).

The purpose of this document is to

correct the application due date by

extending it until 3 p.m. on Monday,

May 15, 1995, in both of the places

referred to above.

DATES: Applications must be received

by the appropriate field office of the

HUD Office of Native American

Programs (ONAP) no later than 3 p.m.,

May 15, 1995. Application materials

will be available from each field office.

General program questions may be

directed to the field office serving your

area or by contacting Dom Nessi, Office

of Native American Programs, Office of

Public and Indian Housing, Department

of Housing and Urban Development,

Room B–133, 451 Seventh Street SW.,

Washington, DC 20410. Telephone (202)
13446 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 48 / Monday, March 13, 1995 / Notices

755–0068. The Telecommunications

Device for the Deaf (TDD) number is

(202) 708–0850. (These are not toll-free

numbers.)

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Accordingly, FR Doc. 95–4451, the

Notice of Fund Availability for Fiscal

Year 1995 for Community Development

Block Grant Program for Indian Tribes

and Alaska Native Villages, published

in the Federal Register on February 24,

1995 at 60 FR 10452, is corrected as

follows:

1. On page 10452, in the first column,

in the DATES section, in line 5, the date

‘‘May 14, 1995’’ is corrected to read

‘‘May 15, 1995’’.

2. On page 10464, in the first column,

in paragraph II.(c), in the last line in the

column, correct ‘‘May 14, 1995’’ to read

‘‘May 15, 1995’’.

Dated: March 6, 1995.

Camille E. Acevedo,

Assistant General Counsel for Regulations.

[FR Doc. 95–6052 Filed 3–10–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210–33–P

[Docket No. N–95–3846; FR–3786–N–02]

Notice of Amendment to NOFA for

Fiscal Year 1995 for Indian Applicants

Under the HOME Program

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant

Secretary for Public and Indian

Housing, HUD.

ACTION: Notice of amendment to notice

of funding availability (NOFA) for fiscal

year (FY) 1995 for Indian Applicants for

HOME Investment Partnerships Act (the

HOME Act) programs, referred to as the

HOME program.

SUMMARY: This notice amends the FY

1995 Indian HOME NOFA published on

January 17, 1995 (60 FR 3520), to

conform with the recent interim

regulation which expanded the number

of eligible applicants. It also makes

corrections or clarifications to several

statements in the text of the NOFA,

including a modification to Appendix 1,

List of Local Offices of Native American

Programs.

DATES: The application due date

remains the same. Applications must be

RECEIVED by the Office of Native

American Programs (ONAP) having

jurisdiction over the applicant on or

before 3 p.m. (ONAP local time) on

April 14, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bruce Knott, Director, Division of

Housing and Community Development,

Office of Native American Programs,

451 Seventh Street, SW., Washington,

DC 20410, telephone (202) 755–0068

(this is not a toll-free number). Hearingor speech-impaired persons may use the

TDD number by contacting the Federal

Information Relay Service on 1–800–

877–TDDY (1–800–877–8339)(a toll-free

number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On

January 17, 1995 (60 FR 3520) the

Department published the FY 1995

Indian HOME NOFA. This notice makes

a number of corrections or clarifications

to several statements in the text of the

NOFA:

Eligible Applicants

Section I.(c)(1) on page 3521,

pertaining to eligible applicants, is

revised to reflect an amendment made

to the HOME rule at 24 CFR Part 92.

This amendment broadens the category

of eligible applicants to include Tribal

organizations.

Number of Copies of Application

This notice specifies that applicants

must submit an original and two copies

of the application. This requirement is

added to the end of the paragraph

headed ‘‘Summary,’’ on page 3520, and

to the Checklist of Eligibility

Requirements and Application

Submission Requirements, on page

3521.

Typographical Error

On page 3522, the designation of the

section on ‘‘Economic Opportunities for

Low and Very Low Income Persons’’ is

corrected from ‘‘E’’ to ‘‘G’’.

Building Codes

On page 3522, section I.(d)(2)(vii) in

the second column requires the

submission of ‘‘A statement

documenting the codes for the project’’.

This requirement ties in with the

selection criterion, ‘‘Project feasibility,’’

in the first column on page 3524 at

section I.(e)(1)(ii)(E) and item (5) in the

last paragraph in the column, which

both refer to building codes. The

requirement and the references are

being deleted because they are not in

accord with the regulation (24 CFR

92.621) that is cited for building codes.

Benefits to Very Low-Income and LowIncome Members of the Tribe

A clarification is made regarding the

formula in section (1)(i)(D) on page 3523

of the NOFA, ‘‘Benefits to Very Low and

Low-Income Members of the Tribe.’’

The formula must use the total of all the

families with unmet housing needs,

rather than only the families with unmet

needs in the particular category for

which the application is made. An

example is provided. Clarification of the

effect of a mixed project on the formula

is also provided. A mixed project may

be mixed as to tenure (e.g., rental, home

ownership), but it may not be mixed as

to type (i.e., a combination of

acquisition, rehabilitation, new

construction). If the project is mixed,

that fact is of no consequence in using

the formula.

Staffing Plan During Implementation

On page 3526 of the NOFA, column

1, ‘‘(iii) Staffing Plan during

Implementation,’’ the narrative reads,

‘‘A proposal having highly experienced/

competent personnel will receive 11–15

points.’’ The scoring guide (Table 11)

doesn’t allow for a range of points. It

assigns 15 points for Good, 7 for Fair,

0 for Unsatisfactory. This notice amends

the text to delete the range and make

clear that 15 points will be awarded if

the criterion is met.

Points for Geographic Diversity

The NOFA on page 3520, column 2,

and page 3521, column 1, in discussing

the new geographic diversity provision

refers to an application which scores

over 50 points. However, on page 3527,

column 2, in citing geographic diversity,

the NOFA refers to an application that

scores at least 50 points. To clarify that

the Department means at least 50 point,

i.e., 50 or above, a correction is made to

the statements at the referenced

locations.

This notice also includes a

modification to Appendix 1.—List of

Local Offices of Native American

Programs, to add that Utah tribes apply

to Northern Plains ONAP and Iowa

tribes apply to Eastern/Woodlands

ONAP.

Accordingly, the Department amends

the FY 1995 Indian HOME NOFA

published on January 17, 1995 (60 FR

3520) as set forth below:

1. A new sentence is added to the

paragraph headed ‘‘Summary,’’ in the

first column on page 3520 to read as

follows:

* * * Applicants must submit an

original and two copies of the

application.

2. On page 3520, the fifth paragraph

which appears in the second column is

revised to read as follows:

This year there is a geographic

diversity requirement in the NOFA

which assures that for every ONAP

Region with a fundable application

which scores at least 50 points there

will be one award which goes to the

highest scoring application from that

ONAP Region.

3. On page 3521, section I.(b)(2),

which appears in the first column, is

revised to read as follows: