alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          88,670
<SECURITIES>                                     2,196
<RECEIVABLES>                                   71,522
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          26,087
<DEPRECIATION>                                  24,232
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 388,430
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       170,355
<OTHER-SE>                                     129,651
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   388,430
<SALES>                                        108,060
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               108,060
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                75,942
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 353
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 32,815
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,618
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             19,197
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,197
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.30


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7411
KEVIN SILER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus EUGENE NUTH, Warden, M.C.A.C.; RICHARD LANHAM, Commissioner of Correction; ARCHIE GEE, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. M. J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-96-323- MJG) Submitted: January 9, 1997 Decided: February 5, 1997 Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kevin Siler, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., AttorneyGeneral, Glenn T. Marrow, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint and motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Siler v. Nuth , No. CA-96-323- MJG (D. Md. Aug. 12, 1996; Sept. 20, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>
                                  Exhibit 31.1

I, Jeffrey S. Stone, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Tweeter Home
     Entertainment Group, Inc.;
2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;
3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
     controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
     that material information relating to the registrant, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
     prepared;
b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
     over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
     fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
     annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
     materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
     reporting; and
5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
     of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
     operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonable
     likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
     summarize and report financial information; and
b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
     over financial reporting.

Date: August 16, 2004
                                        /s/ Jeffrey S. Stone
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
#### Glendon BRAGG, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 66699.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

April 18, 1995.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 31, 1995.

Judith LaRose, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Cheryl A. Caponegro, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the judgment of the motion court is not clearly erroneous. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, we have furnished the parties with a memorandum opinion setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 53 (Monday, March 20, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 14733]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6813]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

United States-Canada Free-Trade Agreement, Article 1904 
Binational Panel Reviews: Notice of Completion of Panel Review

AGENCY: United States-Canada Free-Trade Agreement, Binational 
Secretariat, United States Section, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of Completion of Panel Review of the final affirmative 
injury determination made by the U.S. International Trade Commission, 
respecting Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada, Secretariat 
File No. USA-92-1904-02.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the memorandum Opinion and Order of the 
Binational Panel dated January 27, 1995, dismissing the panel review 
described above and the Article 1904 Panel Rules, the panel review was 
completed on March 10, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James R. Holbein, United States Secretary, Binational Secretariat, 
Suite 2061, 14th and Constitution Avenue, Washington, DC 20230, (202) 
482-5438.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On January 27, 1995, the Binational Panel 
issued an order dismissing the panel review of the final affirmative 
injury determination of the United States International Trade 
Commission (``ITC'') concerning Certain Softwood Lumber Products from 
Canada. The Secretariat was instructed to issue a Notice of Completion 
of Panel Review on the 31st day following the issuance of the Notice of 
Final Panel Action, if no Request for an Extraordinary Challenge was 
filed. The Notice of Final Panel Action was issued on February 7, 1995. 
No Extraordinary Challenge request was filed in the time permitted by 
the FTA and the relevant rules of procedure. Therefore, on the basis of 
the Panel Order and Rule 80 of the Article 1904 Panel Rules, the Panel 
Review was completed and the panelists discharged from their duties 
effective March 10, 1995.

    Dated: March 13, 1995.
James R. Holbein,
United States Secretary NAFTA Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 95-6813 Filed 3-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-GT-M
Exhibit 99
                             Selected Information
                    Relating to Series 1992-1 Certificates,
            Series 1992-2 Certificates, Series 1994-1 Certificates,
            Series 1995-1 Certificates, Series 1996-1 Certificates
             and Series 1996-2 Certificates from January 1, 1996
                             through December 31, 1996
                    ----------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

           Series 1992-1    Series 1992-2    Series 1994-1    Series 1995-1  
           6 7/8% Auto      7 3/8% Auto      Floating Rate    6.50% Auto
           Loan Asset       Loan Asset       Loan Asset       Loan Asset
           Backed           Backed           Backed           Backed 
           Certificates     Certificates     Certificates     Certificates 
           ------------     ------------     ------------     ------------   



<S>        <C>              <C>              <C>              <C>            


Interest
Paid       $ 68,750,000.04  $ 51,624,999.96  $ 57,778,234.99  $ 62,965,277.83

Servicing
Fee Paid   $  9,999,999.96  $  6,999,999.96  $  9,999,999.96  $  9,999,999.96





           Series 1996-1    Series 1996-2     
           5.50% Auto       Floating Rate    
           Loan Asset       Loan Asset        
           Backed           Backed            
           Certificates     Certificates     
           ------------     ------------

Interest   $ 36,733,333.36  $ 46,378,733.34
Paid

Servicing  $  6,666,666.70  $  8,000,000.00
Fee Paid      





</TABLE>

                                    -20-
EXHIBIT 32

Re:

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In
connection with the Annual Report of Eastern American Natural Gas Trust (the "Trust") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust at the dates and for
the periods presented.

The
above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the
Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.

The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.,
Trustee for Eastern American Natural Gas TrustBy:

/s/ MIKE ULRICH Vice President
The Bank of New York Mellon
Trust Company, N.A.Date: March 15, 2010


---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          15,205
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          41,675
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      1,637,507
<ALLOWANCE>                                   (88,397)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,760,785
<DEPOSITS>                                     463,435
<SHORT-TERM>                                   982,547
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             90,411
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           272
<OTHER-SE>                                     224,120
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,760,785
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                223,488
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,523
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   255
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               226,266
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              26,651
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              79,129
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          147,137
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  137,115
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                283,427
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 37,493
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      37,493
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    23,246
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.86
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                    68,035
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                63,704
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  138,181
<RECOVERIES>                                    21,759
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               88,397
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            88,397
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### ARNOLD PROCTOR by His Next Friend, MRS. C. D. PROCTOR, v. CARTER FABRICS CORPORATION and LAFAYETTE G. HAYWOOD.

(Filed 11 December, 1946.)

PlaiNTiee’s appeal from *Burgwyn, Special Judge,*at March, 1946, Civil Term, of G-uileord (High Point Division).

*Gold, McAnally & Gold for plaintiff, appellant.*

*James B. Lovelace for defendants, appellees.*

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff, a minor, sued by his next friend to recover for serious injuries sustained through the alleged negligence of the defendants in the operation of a truck which struck and ran upon said plaintiff. Judgment of nonsuit was entered upon defendants’ demurrer to the evidence, and ¡ilaintiff appealed. The Court is of the opinion that the demurrer was properly sustained, and the judgment is

Af&rmed.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the quarterly report of EBS Building, LLC (the Company) on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Keith F. Cooper, Senior
Managing Director of the Manager of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
                    Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Commission or its staff upon request.

| | /s/ Keith F. Cooper                                                                                        
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Keith F. Cooper, Senior Managing Director
 FTI Consulting, as Manager EBS Building, L.L.C. 
August 13, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 57 (Friday, March 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15566]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7323]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY


Public Information Collection Requirements Submitted to OMB for 
Review

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has submitted 
to the Office of Management and Budget the following public information 
collection requirements for review and clearance in accordance with the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, 44 U.S.C. chapter 35.

DATES: Comments on this information collection must be submitted on or 
before May 23, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Direct comments regarding the burden estimate or any aspect 
of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this 
burden, to: the FEMA Information Collections Clearance Officer at the 
address below; and to Donald Arbuckle, Office of Management and Budget, 
3235 New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503, (202) 395-
7340, within 60 days of this notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Copies of the above information 
collection request and supporting documentation can be obtained by 
calling or writing Muriel B. Anderson, FEMA Information Collections 
Clearance Officer, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street 
SW., Washington, DC 20472 (202) 646-2624.
    Type: New collection.
    Title: Standard Hazard Determination (Flood Hazards).
    Abstract: The National Flood Insurance Reform Act of 1994 requires 
development of a form (FEMA Form 81-93, Standard Hazard Determination 
(Flood Hazards) by FEMA. The form will be used by the lending industry 
to determine whether or not a structure is located within a Special 
Flood Area and if flood insurance is available, in accordance with the 
Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973.
    Type of Respondents: Business or other for-profit.
    Estimate of Total Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping Burden: 4,000, 
000 hours.
    Number of Respondents: 12,000,000.
    Estimated Average Burden Time per Response: 20 minutes.
    Frequency of Response: Other. The form is completed for any loan 
made, increased, extended, renewed, or purchased by regulated lending 
institutions, federal agency lenders, the Federal National Mortgage 
Association, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, and the 
Government National Mortgage Association.

    Dated: March 16, 1995.
Wesley C. Moore,
Director, Office of Administrative Support.
[FR Doc. 95-7323 Filed 3-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-01-M
v7

. 8-2 /fiSo-a^

'75uS"V--iAAo+\fuK 4*°'••' NAtrvM^ 'v^(^\ -bvoJr

'Mc|--'. AfxO' rv\cv\\\f\<^ ca^±^S> \Sl ' . :

1 .; —'

••lAuFRtfrc^ k)V^RJr. •

2^o ^pftee 6\vj^ !

' '' ft-PT. '.^-7-A

bfcJ ^\6.,rvjk • H^SKo

\a >r<?^r<4s -Vo \\o77 ,

U)r^l,o8o ~o| ... . • •• :•

.. oo^'- 9)2-. 060 -0-2L :

# .

.•~^VxvA\C Vol^ •

/^LsC^sx{/Jj~> /U^/^z^\

' • •'''•••• . • • • •' '

• • ' • RECFIVFDIW' '

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

•• FEB 09 2015

' ' Ah/f^l ^iWMjftffli (PHar1!1' AIJUI imlUUjaltfci!9 MlSlllr*

A

• •'.''..' ' •. • '

•'.'••'. ' ' ,' ' .' •.•..'" •'.''•
•"

Abraham Campos/

Vs.

The State Of Texas

PDR NO.1234-14

§

§

RECEIVED \H

COURT OFCRIMINAL APPEAL!

MAR 12 2015

In The Court Of Criminal

^belAcosts, Cterk Appeals Of Texas

Austin,Texas

at

PRO-SE MOTION REQUESTING LEAVE TO FILE AN COURTnrFILED IN* ORIGINAL COPY ONLY OF THE PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW 0F CRIMINAL APPEALS

MAR 13 2015

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS:

COMES NOW, Abraham Campos, 721237,Appellant/Petitioner in the above s£yK§' C,erk

and numbered cause and respectfully move this Honorable Court to Grant leave

to file an original copy of the Petition For Discretionary Review and in

support thereof would show to the Court the following:

I.

(1) The style and appeal Number in the Court of Appeals First District at

Houston,Texas NO.01-14-000167-Cr,Trial Court NO.26,947,149th District Court

of Brazoria County,Texas.,Abraham Campos-V.-State Of Texas.

(2) The Appellant/Petitioner moves that pursuant to Rule 2,Texas Rules of

Appellate Procedure,this Court Suspends Rule 9.3(B),T.R.A.P.,that requires

the filing of eleven copies (11) of the Petition For Discretionary Review

with the court.

(3) The fact relied upon to show good cause for this request are, as follow:

The Appellant is indigent and incarcerated and does not have access to a

photo copy machine. The Appellant is presently not represented by Counsel

and intends to file a Pro-se Petion For Discretionary Review.

WHEREFORE,PREMISES CONSIDERED,The Appellant/Petitioner respectfully requests

that this Honorable Court grant leave to file an Original Copy Only of the

Petition For Discretionary Review with the Court.

Respectfully submitted

\t2MMM.

/S/ Abraham Campos^

Eastham Unit

2665 Prison Rd.#l

Lovelady,Texas 75851

Appellant Pro-se
.jp

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Abraham Campos,certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing

"Pro-se Motion Requesting Leave To File An Original Copy Only Of The Petition

For Discretionary Review " was forwarded by U.S.Mail,postage prepaid,To:

Jeri Yenn,District Attorney of Brazoria County,Texas at 111 E.Locust St.,

Room 408-A,Angleton, Texas 77515. On this day of 2015.

/S/ Abraham Campos-#72123^

Eastham Unit .

2665 Prison Rd.#l

Lovelady, Texas 75851

Appellant Pro-se