alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 46 (Thursday, March 9, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 12940]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5726]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-178-000]


Northern Natural Gas Co.; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas 
Tariff

March 3, 1995.
    Take notice that on February 28, 1995, Northern Natural Gas Company 
(Northern), tendered for filing changes in its FERC Gas Tariff, Fifth 
Revised Volume No. 1.
    Northern states that the filing revises the current Stranded 
Account No. 858 and Stranded Account No. 858-R.A. surcharges, both of 
which are designed to recover costs incurred by Northern related to its 
contracts with third-party pipelines. Therefore, Northern has filed 
Sixteenth Revised Sheet Nos. 50 and 51 to revised these surcharges 
effective April 1, 1995.
    Northern states that copies of this filing were served upon the 
Company's customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 
20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests should 
be filed on or before March 10, 1995. All protests will be considered 
by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken in 
this proceeding, but will not serve to make protestant a party to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-5726 Filed 3-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
|   | Exhibit 32.1 |
|--------|--------------|

RULE 13(a)-14(b) CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Brandywine Operating Partnership, L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the three-month period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gerard H. Sweeney, President and Chief Executive Officer of Brandywine Realty Trust, the Partnership’s sole general partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

| 1.     |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                   |   |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                    |   |
| 2.     |   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership. |   |

/s/ Gerard H. Sweeney              Gerard H. SweeneyPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate: May 11, 2005             

*  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Brandywine Realty Trust and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  

 

----
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3171

Protect Plus, LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_05.09.19.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 52 (Friday, March 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14447-14448]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6691]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service


Delta Region Preservation Commission; Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act that a meeting of the Delta Region Preservation 
Commission will be held at 7:00 p.m., on Wednesday, April 12, 1995, in 
the Environmental Education Center, Barataria Preserve Unit, Jean 
Lafitte National Historical Park and Preserve, 7400 Highway 45, 
Marrero, Louisiana.
    The Delta Region Preservation Commission was established pursuant 
to Section 907 of Public Law 95-625 (16 U.S.C. 230f), as amended, to 
advise the Secretary of the Interior in the selection [[Page 14448]] of 
sites for inclusion in Jean Lafitte National Historical Park and 
Preserve, and in the implementation and development of a general 
management plan and of a comprehensive interpretive program of the 
natural, historic, and cultural resources of the Region.
    The matters to be discussed at this meeting include:

--Old Business
--New Business
--Update on Park Resource Issues
--Presentation by the National Biological Service
--General Park Update

    The meeting will be open to the public. However, facilities and 
space for accommodating members of the public are limited, and persons 
will be accommodated on a first-come-first-served basis. Any member of 
the pubic may file a written statement concerning the matters to be 
discussed with the Superintendent, Jean Lafitte National Historical 
Park and Preserve.
    Person wishing further information concerning this meeting, or who 
wish to submit written statements may contact Robert Belous, 
Superintendent, Jean Lafitte National Historical Park and Preserve, 365 
Canal Street, Suite 3080, New Orleans, Louisiana 70130, Telephone 504/
589-3882.
    Minutes of the meeting will be available for public inspection four 
weeks after the meeting at the office of Jean Lafitte National 
Historical Park and Preserve.

    Dated: March 8, 1995.
Jerry Rogers,
Regional Director, Southwest Region.
[FR Doc. 95-6691 Filed 3-16-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3748 

To expand employees eligible for leave and employers subject to leave 

requirements. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 3, 2022 

Ms. SMITH (for herself, Ms. WARREN, Mr. DURBIN, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Mr. 

PADILLA, and Mrs. MURRAY) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, 

and Pensions 

A BILL 

To expand employees eligible for leave and employers subject 

to leave requirements. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Job Protection Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF EMPLOYEES ELIGIBLE FOR LEAVE. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 101(2) of the Family and 

7 Medical Leave Act of 1993 (29 U.S.C. 2611(2)) is amend8 ed— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3748 IS

1 (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘em2 ployed—’’ and all that follows through the end of 

3 the subparagraph and inserting ‘‘employed for not 

4 less than 90 days by the employer with respect to 

5 whom leave is requested under section 102.’’; 

6 (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘does not 

7 include—’’ and all that follows through the end of 

8 the subparagraph and inserting ‘‘does not include 

9 any Federal officer or employee covered under sub10 chapter V of chapter 63 of title 5, United States 

11 Code (as added by title II of this Act).’’; 

12 (3) by striking subparagraphs (C) and (D); and 

13 (4) by redesignating subparagraph (E) as sub14 paragraph (C). 

15 (b) FEDERAL EMPLOYEES.— 

16 (1) TITLE 5.—Subchapter V of chapter 63 of 

17 title 5, United States Code, is amended— 

18 (A) in section 6381(1)(B), by striking ‘‘12 

19 months’’ and inserting ‘‘90 days’’; and 

20 (B) in section 6382(d)(2)(E), by striking 

21 ‘‘12 months’’ and inserting ‘‘90 days’’. 

22 (2) PRESIDENTIAL EMPLOYEES.—Section 

23 412(a)(2)(B) of title 3, United States Code, is 

24 amended by striking ‘‘12 months and for at least 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3748 IS

1 1,250 hours of employment during the previous 12 

2 months’’ and inserting ‘‘90 days’’. 

3 (3) CONGRESSIONAL EMPLOYEES.—Section 

4 202(a)(2)(B) of the Congressional Accountability 

5 Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1312(a)(2)(B)) is amended 

6 by striking ‘‘12 months and for at least 1,250 hours 

7 of employment during the previous 12 months’’ and 

8 inserting ‘‘90 days’’. 

9 SEC. 3. EXPANSION OF EMPLOYERS SUBJECT TO LEAVE RE10 QUIREMENTS. 

11 Section 101(4)(A)(i) of the Family and Medical 

12 Leave Act of 1993 (29 U.S.C. 2611(4)(A)(i)) is amended 

13 by striking ‘‘50 or more employees’’ and all that follows 

14 through the end of the clause and inserting ‘‘1 or more 

15 employees’’. 

16 SEC. 4. APPLICABILITY. 

17 This Act, and the amendments made by this Act, 

18 shall apply with respect to leave taken on or after the date 

19 of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Lester Allen DODSON, Appellant. Lester Allen DODSON, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. 60203, 64021.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

March 22, 1994.

Marcie W. Bower, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Michael J. Spillane, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

*177
      *ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Lester Allen Dodson, appeals from his conviction, after a jury trial, of sodomy. Defendant was sentenced as a persistent offender to imprisonment for fifteen years.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. Defendant’s conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Defendant also appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. Defendant did not brief any allegations of error regarding the motion. Defendant’s appeal is dismissed. Rule 84.13.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

HOANG AI LE, AKA Ah Hoang, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 22-10081 

D.C. No. 

4:96-cr-00094-JSW-7 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Jeffrey S. White, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 19, 2023**

San Francisco, California

Before: VANDYKE and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges, and LASNIK,*** District 

Judge.

Hoang Ai Le (“Le”) appeals Judge Jeffrey S. White’s order denying in part 

his motion to correct his sentence for clerical error pursuant to Federal Rule of 

Criminal Procedure 36. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*** The Honorable Robert S. Lasnik, United States District Judge for the 

Western District of Washington, sitting by designation.

FILED

APR 21 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 

for clear error the grant or denial of a Rule 36 motion, see United States v. Dickie, 

752 F.2d 1398, 1400 (9th Cir. 1985) (per curiam), and we affirm.

Le contends that Judge White erred by striking all references in the

judgment to his pending Eastern District of California case in which a sentence had 

not yet been imposed. “The only sentence that is legally cognizable is the actual 

oral pronouncement in the presence of the defendant.” United States v. MunozDela Rosa, 495 F.2d 253, 256 (9th Cir. 1974) (per curiam) (citations omitted). “A 

change made under Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 can do no more than conform the sentence 

to the term which the record indicates was intended.” United States v. Kaye, 739 

F.2d 488, 490 (9th Cir. 1984). 

Le’s sentence was orally pronounced by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel. Judge 

White determined that Judge Patel never intended to decide whether the sentence 

she imposed on Le would be served concurrently or consecutively to any future 

sentence imposed in the Eastern District. Judge White did not clearly err in doing 

so. Judge Patel noted that Le was not serving any other sentence at that time and 

the court had no control over the proceedings in the Eastern District. This 

unambiguous statement reflects established law in this circuit. See United States v. 

Montes-Ruiz, 745 F.3d 1286, 1291–93 (9th Cir. 2014). And, as the parties agree, 

the amended judgement does not alter the term Le is currently serving. See 18 

U.S.C. § 3584(a). 
3 

AFFIRMED.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4308 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to modify the definition of spouse 

and surviving spouse to include all individuals lawfully married, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2022 

Mr. PETERS (for himself, Ms. COLLINS, Ms. MURKOWSKI, and Ms. HASSAN) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to modify the definition of spouse and surviving spouse to include all individuals lawfully married, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Marriage 

5 Recognition Act of 2022’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4308 IS

1 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF DEFINITION OF SPOUSE AND 

2 SURVIVING SPOUSE FOR DEPARTMENT OF 

3 VETERANS AFFAIRS TO INCLUDE ALL INDI4 VIDUALS LAWFULLY MARRIED. 

5 Section 101 of title 38, United States Code, is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘of the oppo8 site sex who was the spouse of a veteran’’ and in9 serting ‘‘who was lawfully married to a veteran, in10 cluding a marriage between two persons of the same 

11 sex,’’; and 

12 (2) in paragraph (31), by striking ‘‘of the oppo13 site sex’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 3.2

                           CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                       OF

                           ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

FRANKLYN S. BARRY, JR., and JAMES A. JOYCE certify that:

     1.     They are President and Secretary, respectively, of BISHOP
            EQUITIES, INC., a Nevada corporation.

     2.     Article FIRST of the Articles of Incorporation of this
            corporation is amended to read as follows:

            "FIRST:     THE NAME OF THIS CORPORATION IS:

                        AETHLON MEDICAL, INC."

     3.     The foregoing Amendment of Articles of Incorporation has been
            duly approved by the Board of Directors.

     4.     The foregoing Amendment of Articles of Incorporation has been duly
            approved by the required vote of shareholders in accordance with
            the Corporations Code. The total number of outstanding shares of
            the corporation is 2,660,000. The number of shares voting in
            favor of the Amendment equaled or exceeded the vote required. The
            percentage vote required was more than 50%.

     We further declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State
of Nevada that the matters set forth in this certificate are true and correct
of our own knowledge.

Date:  March 28, 2000

                                       /s/ FRANKLYN S. BARRY, JR.
                                       -------------------------------------
                                       FRANKLYN S. BARRY, JR., PRESIDENT


                                       /s/ JAMES A. JOYCE
                                       -------------------------------------
                                       JAMES A. JOYCE, SECRETARY
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

October 26, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2211

Machinery Sales Company, Inc. dba U. S. Industrial Machinery:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
exv4w3






Exhibit 4.3




DENBURY RESOURCES INC.




DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PLAN




As amended on

February 22, 2001

May 11, 2005 and

June 29, 2011




AMENDMENT




                    Denbury Resources Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), in accordance with
Section 6(b) of the Denbury Resources Inc. Director Compensation Plan, as amended (the “Plan”),
amends the Plan effective February 2009 as set forth below:




	 	1.	 	Section 2(a) shall be amended by deleting “100,000” and replacing it
with “400,000” and deleting “6(e)” and replacing it with “5(f).”
	 
	 	2.	 	Section 5(a) shall be amended by deleting the words “The members of the
Audit Committee” and replacing the with “The directors.”
	 
	 	3.	 	Section 5(d) shall be amended by deleting “1(j)” and replacing it with
“1(g).”
	 
	 	4.	 	Section 6(a) is amended to read as follows:






“The Plan shall become effective on July 1, 2000, and unless earlier terminated or extended
pursuant to Section 6(b), the Plan shall expire on July 1, 2015.”




	 	5.	 	The remainder of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.
	 
	 	 	 	IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed this 29th day of June, 2011.





	 	 	 	 	 
	 	DENBURY RESOURCES INC.

 	 
	 	 	/s/ Mark C. Allen	 
	 	 	Mark C. Allen	 
	 	 	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3263

CW Bearing USA, Inc:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 13, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2504

Eccotemp Systems, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn