alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 47 (Friday, March 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 13160]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5940]



[[Page 13160]]

GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE


The Federal Register Online Via GPO Access; Public Meeting for 
Federal, State and Local Agencies, and Others Interested in a 
Demonstration of GPO Access, the Online Service Providing the Federal 
Register and Other Federal Databases

    The Superintendent of Documents will hold a public meeting for 
Federal, state, and local government agencies, and others interested in 
an overview and demonstration of the Government Printing Office's 
online service GPO Access, provided under the Government Printing 
Office Electronic Information Access Enhancement Act of 1993 (Public 
Law 103-40).
    The session is available on Wednesday, April 5, 1995, from 1 p.m. 
to 2:30 p.m. The training session will be held at the Dallas Public 
Library, Library Auditorium, 1515 Young Street, Dallas, Texas 75201.
    The online Federal Register Service offers access to the daily 
issues of the Federal Register by 6 a.m. on the day of publication. All 
notices, rules and proposed rules, Presidential documents, executive 
orders, separate parts, and reader aids are included in the database as 
ASCII text files, with graphics provided in TIFF format. The online 
Federal Register is available via the Internet or as a dial-in service. 
Historical data is available from January 1994 forward.
    Other databases currently available online through GPO Access 
include the Congressional Record; Congressional Record Index, including 
the History of Bills; Congressional Bills; Public Laws; and U.S. Code.
    Individuals interested in attending the training session should 
contact the GPO's Office of Electronic Information Dissemination 
Services, John Berger, Product Manager, on 202-512-1525; (FAX) 202-512-
1262; or by Internet e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a6cec3cad6e6c3cfc2d5969388c3cfc2d588c1d6c988c1c9d0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="741c11180434111d100744415a111d10075a13041b5a131b02">[email protected]</span></a>. Seating 
reservations will be accepted through Friday, March 31, 1995.
Michael F. DiMario,
Public Printer.
[FR Doc. 95-5940 Filed 3-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-02-M

</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 7, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 12551]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5466]



[[Page 12551]]

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

[Docket No. ER94-1614-000]


Southern Company Services, Inc.; Filing

March 1, 1995.
    Take notice that on February 1, 1995, Southern Company Services, 
Inc., tendered for filing an amendment in the above-referenced docket.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules 
of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before March 13, 1995. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-5466 Filed 3-6-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Order filed March 1 , 2018

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 17

- 00971

- CR

____________ MOHAMMED RIZWAN RAH MAN , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No 1

Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 16

- CCR

- 187232A



### ORDER
On October 24, 2017, we ordered t he Fort Bend County Clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record by January 16, 2018 . The record was not filed , so we issued a second order on January 30, 2018, ordering the clerk to file the record by February 9, 2018. The record has still not been filed

.
W e order the Fort Bend County Clerk to file the past

- due supplemental record by March 12 , 2018 , containing the following two documents:2

1. Order on Application for Pre

- Trial Writ of Habeas Corpus, signed October 23, 2017; and

2. Notice of appeal, filed December 5 , 2017

If any omitted item is not part of the case file, the county clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the omitted item is not a part of the case file. The supplemental clerk’s record is due by M arch 12 , 2018.

PER CURIAM
#### STATE v. HOMER REED.

(Filed 12 December, 1928.)

Indictment — Indictment Drawn Under Statute Superseded by. Hater Act.

Where there is an erroneous conviction of wilful injury to personal property under C. S., 4331, when the indictment should have been drawn under chapter 61, Public Laws 1927, the prisoner should be discharged with permission to the solicitor to send another bill, if so advised.

Appeal by defendant from *Moore, J.,*at June Term, 1928, of BuNCOMBE.

Criminal prosecution tried upon indictments charging the defendant with (1) larceny, (2) false pretense, and (3) wilful injury to personal property.

The evidence tends to show that the defendant hired an automobile from Clinton Littrell for approximately three hours, to go from New-found to Canton, á distance of about twenty miles; that instead of going to Canton the defendant went to Asheville, a distance of about fourteen miles; that the defendant did not return the car at the time agreed upon and that when he did return it, the car was in a badly damaged condition.

Verdict: Guilty on all three charges.

From the judgments pronoixnced on the verdict, 12 months on each of the first two charges, and 6 months on the last, the defendant appeals, assigning errors.

*Attorney-General Brummitt and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.*

*Thos. A. Gurry for defendant.*

Stacy, C. J.

The record discloses no evidence of larceny, a fatally defective charge of false pretense, and an erroneous conviction under C. S., 4331, with a sentence of 6 months on the roads, when the indict*358ment sboulcl have been drawn under chapter 61, Public Laws 1927, and the sentence not more than 30 days imprisonment or a fine of not more than $50.00.

Let the defendant be discharged, with permission to the solicitor to send another bill, if so advised.

Reversed.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2556

Primex Family of Companies:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3497

JLG Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
#### HARVEY WOOD v. CAROLINA TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH COMPANY.

(Filed *17*March, 1948.)

Appeal by plaintiff from *Morris, J.,*November Term, 1947, Joinsr-stoN.

Affirmed.

*609*Parker ■& Parker for plaintiff appellant.*

*Leggett & Fountain for defendant appellee.*

BarNhill, J.

This is an action instituted by the plaintiff to recover for loss of services and for expenses incurred for tbe medical care of his infant son who is plaintiff in *Wood v. Telephone Co., ante,*p. 605. The determinative facts are the same as in that case. Hence, what is there' said controls decision here.

The judgment below is

Affirmed.
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.28

CoreStates Bank, N.A.
Suite 300
2240 Butler Pike
Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462-1302
610 834 2013
Fax 610 834 2069

June 24, 1996

Mr. William W. Yeager
Chief Financial Officer
Menley & James Laboratories, Inc.
100 Tournament Drive
Horsham, PA 19044

Dear Bill:

This letter evidences the approval of CoreStates Meridian Bank to extend,
pursuant to your request, the expiration date of the Revolving Credit dated
December 2, 1993 to June 30, 1998 from April 30, 1997. Additionally, as a result
of previous amendments, the maximum amount available for borrowing by Menley &
James Laboratories, Inc. under the Revolving Credit is $3,000,000. Further, all
other terms and conditions contained in the Loan Agreement, including subsequent
amendments, remain unchanged.

If you should have any questions regarding the foregoing, please contact me.

Sincerely,


/s/
______________________
James D. Miller
Vice President

<PAGE>

CoreStates Bank, N.A.
2240 Butler Pike
Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462
610 834 2013
Fax 610 834 2069

October 7, 1996

Mr. William W. Yeager
Chief Financial Officer
Menley & James Laboratories, Inc.
100 Tournament Drive
Horsham, PA 19044

Dear Bill:

Pursuant to our recent conversation, this letter evidences the consent of
CoreStates Bank to the following:

  1. Menley & James Laboratories, Inc. shall maintain a Minimum Net Worth of
     $20,500,000 at all times.

  2. Menley & James Laboratories, Inc. shall not incur capital
     expenditures and capital lease obligations in any one fiscal year,
     on a non-cumulative basis, in excess of $500,000.

If you should have any questions regarding the foregoing, please contact me.

Sincerely,


/s/
______________________
James D. Miller
Vice President

                                       2
EXHIBIT 10.1

CONTINGENT ANNUAL BONUS AGREEMENT

The undersigned employee, John R. Plachetka
(the Employee), acknowledges and agrees that on February 14, 2007, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of POZEN Inc. (the Company) approved, as a part of Employees annual cash bonus
for 2006, a contingent bonus amount of $75,075.00 (the Contingent Bonus) to Employee, payable as described below and subject to the fulfillment of certain conditions as set forth herein. Employee acknowledges and agrees that,
pursuant to such approval, the Contingent Bonus shall not be paid unless and until the Company has received an action letter from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration indicating approval of the New Drug Application for Trexima, the proposed brand
name for the combination of GlaxoSmithKlines sumatriptan and naproxen sodium in a single tablet being developed by the Company for the acute treatment of migraine pursuant to a development and commercialization agreement with GlaxoSmithKline
(the Trexima Approval) provided that the Trexima Approval is received on or before December 31, 2007 and subject to Employees continuous employment by the Company. If the Trexima Approval is received by the Company on
or before December 31, 2007 and Employee is employed by the Company on the date of receipt of such approval, then the Contingent Bonus shall be paid to Employee on the second business day following the Companys receipt of the Trexima
Approval. Employee further acknowledges and agrees that if the Trexima Approval is not received on or before December 31, 2007 or if the Trexima Approval is received on or before December 31, 2007 but Employee is no longer employed by the
Company on such date, the Contingent Bonus shall be forfeited and Employee shall have no right or entitlement to receive the Contingent Bonus. Employee acknowledges and agrees that in the event of a Change of Control (as defined in the POZEN Inc.
Equity Compensation Plan, as amended and restated) of the Company prior to December 31, 2007 and the receipt of the Trexima Approval, the Compensation Committee, in its sole discretion, may accelerate the payment of the Contingent Bonus to a
time immediately prior to such Change of Control. This Agreement shall be binding upon all successors and assigns of the Company, including any corporation or other entity with which or into which the Company may be merged or which may succeed to
its assets or business.



/s/ John R. PlachetkaJohn R. PlachetkaPOZEN INC.By:

/s/ William L. HodgesName:

William L. HodgesTitle:

Senior Vice President, Finance andAdministration, and Chief FinancialOfficer
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-10486

Varex Imaging Corporation: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-20-00056-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.T., A CHILD §

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 323rd District 

Court

of Tarrant County (323-108806-18)

April 30, 2020

Opinion by Chief Justice Sudderth

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is reversed and the case is remanded to the trial court for a new trial. Pursuant 

to the Supreme Court of Texas’s Misc. Docket No. 20-9059, Family Code Section 

263.401(b-1)(1)(B)’s requirement that the new trial must commence not later than the 

180th day after remand is suspended until 30 days after the Governor’s state of 

disaster due to the COVID-19 Pandemic has been lifted.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _/s/ Bonnie Sudderth________________

 Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3127

Speck Pumps-Pool Products, Inc: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions.

pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2525

Reelcraft Industries:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,930
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,937
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,721
<PP&E>                                         570,790
<DEPRECIATION>                                  39,973
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 530,817
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          238,169
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     277,930
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   539,538
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                44,087
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,347
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,921
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,192
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,627
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,627
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,627
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.86


</TABLE>