U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 close



Research
                Research Home
                            National Programs
                            Research Projects
                            Scientific Manuscripts
                            International Engagement
                            Scientific Software/Models
                            Databases and Datasets
                            Office of Scientific Quality Review
            Media
                News & Features
                            Multimedia
                            Briefing Room
                            Down on the Farm
                            Press Room
                            Science in Your Shopping Cart
                            Scientific Discoveries
                            Tellus
                            Under the Microscope
            About ARS
                About ARS Home
                            Staff Directory
                            Labs and Research Centers (Map)
                            Headquarter Offices
                            Organizational Chart
                            Employee Services (REE Employees Only)
                            Office of Outreach, Diversity, and Equal Opportunity
            Work With Us
                Work With Us Home
                            ARS Vacancies at USAJOBS
                            Careers at ARS Information
                            Scientific Collaborations
                            Extramural Agreements
                            1890 Faculty Research Sabbatical ProgramSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Research Publications at this Location





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Title:   Author  item
                                            Vanraden, Paulitem
                                            Powell, Rexitem
                                            EMANUELSON, ULF - INBERBULL CENTRE
  Submitted to: Interbull Annual Meeting Proceedings
                                    Publication Type: Proceedings
                                    Publication Acceptance Date: 5/14/2000
                                    Publication  Date: N/A
                                    Citation: N/AInterpretive Summary: To improve the accuracy of international evaluations of dairy cattle within current computing constraints, a selection index (SI) approach was developed to combine national evaluations with information from foreign relatives. The SI procedure, which includes sire and dam information, was compared with current international methods that use sire and maternal  grandsire information with best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) procedures. Bull evaluations for protein yield from eight countries (Canada, Belgium, Denmark, Estonia, France, Switzerland, The Netherlands, and the United States) were used to investigate differences between SI and BLUP methods. Differences between the two methods were fairly small, and correlations were about .99 for each country's scale. The SI evaluations were more consistent across countries. Accuracy of bull evaluations that included a dam contribution instead of only maternal grandsire information  was higher and should agree more closely with accuracy of national evaluations from animal models. The SI approach was fast and also could be used to provide international evaluations for cows as well as bulls, which would provide a closer connection between national and international evaluations. Centralized processing of cow evaluations should be more efficient than two-way exchange of data files between each of the national centers.
                                Technical Abstract: A selection index (SI) approach was developed to combine national evaluations of cows and bulls with information from foreign relatives. The SI procedure, which includes sire and dam information, was compared with current international methods that use sire and maternal grandsire information with best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) procedures. Bull  evaluations for protein yield from eight countries (Canada, Belgium, Denmark, Estonia, France, Switzerland, The Netherlands, and the United States) were used to investigate differences between SI and BLUP methods. The Interbull Centre (Uppsala, Sweden) supplied national input records for February 2000, and eight national evaluation centers supplied sire and dam information for their bulls. Correlations between SI and BLUP evaluations of bulls ranged from .989 to .993 on the eight country scales. The SI evaluations were more consistent across countries; correlations for all  country pairs ranged from .994 to .999 as compared with correlations of .987 to .996 for BLUP evaluations. Accuracy of bull evaluations that included a dam contribution instead of only maternal grandsire information was higher and should agree more closely with accuracy of national evaluations from animal models. The SI approach was fast (1.5 minutes of processing time per trait needed for the eight countries and 36,294 bulls) and also could be used to provide international evaluations for cows as well as bulls.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov