alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### HORACE KEITH v. LIGGETT & MYERS TOBACCO COMPANY.

(Filed 28 January, 1935.)

Food A a — Evidence held insufficient to connect nianufacturer with foreign substance found in tobacco by consumer.

Evidence that plaintiff purchased a plug of chewing tobacco from a retail merchant of the same brand as manufactured by defendant, and that the tobacco contained a foreign, deleterious substance causing injury to plaintiff is insufficient to resist defendant’s motion as of nonsuit. There is no evidence to show a complete chain from the manufacturer to the consumer.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Crammer, J.,*at September, 1934, Civil Term, of DubiiaM.

Affirmed.

This was a civil action, tried before Hon. E. H. Granmer, Judge, at the September Term, 1934, of the Superior Court of Durham County.

The plaintiff alleged that on or about 9 September, 1933, he purchased a piece of “Spark Plug” tobacco from the store of J. T. May, in the city of Durham, and paid five cents (5c.) for it; that soon after he purchased said tobacco, he took a chew of it and discovered that there was a big, long, green-looking bug embedded in the piece of said tobacco, and as a result thereof he became sick, suffered severe pains, was confined to his bed for a few days, and as a result of said sickness lost about two weeks from his work; that he was employed at the time he became sick and incurred a doctor’s and medical bill. He alleged negligence on the part of the defendant in manufacturing the said tobacco and that the said negligence was the sole, efficient, and proximate cause of his sickness and injury and prays for damage in the sum of $2,000.

The defendant in its answer admitted that it manufactured a brand of tobacco known as “Spark Plug,” but denied any negligence on its *646part in manufacturing said tobacco. The defendant introduced no evidence and at the close of plaintiff’s evidence the defendant made a motion for judgment as in case of nonsuit.. C. S., 567. The court below allowed the motion. Plaintiff excepted, assigned error, and appealed to the Supreme Court.

*J. Grover Lee, 8. J. Bennett, and A. A. McDonald for plaintiff.*

*Fuller, Beade & Fuller for defendant.*

OlaeKson, J.

The principle involved in this case is set forth in *Corum v. Tobacco Co.,*205 N. C., 213. This decision was cited with approval in *Straughn v. Coca-Cola Co.,*205 N. C., 836. In the *Corum case, supra,*the evidence was (p. 214) : “The defendant manufactures a brand of plug or chewing tobacco known as 'Apple Sun-cured.’ It sold some of this tobacco to J. W. Smitherman, a wholesale merchant in Winston-Salem, who in turn sold it to Norman Brothers at East Bend, in Yadkin County. On 4 June, 1931, the plaintiff bought a plug of it from Norman Brothers.” The evidence in that action was sufficient to be submitted to the jury to show a complete chain from the manufacturer to the consumer. There is no sufficient evidence in the present action to be submitted to the jury on this aspect, and therefore there was no error in the judgment of nonsuit in the court below.

The judgment of the court below is

Affirmed.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, August 10, 2022. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, August 10, 2022 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A22D0461. ALAN ROBINSON v. CACH, LLC.
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 16A58409
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3521

Tianhai Electric North America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
balance sheets and statements of operations and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-2000              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-2000              JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-2000              SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          2,596                      446
<SECURITIES>                                        0                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  79,440                  115,752
<ALLOWANCES>                                      782                      603
<INVENTORY>                                   112,490                   95,465
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              229,057                  241,476
<PP&E>                                        290,699                  182,575
<DEPRECIATION>                                 43,586                   21,232
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              1,814,744                1,553,319
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         168,563                  290,514
<BONDS>                                     1,091,397                  681,672
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0                        0
<PREFERRED>                                        37                        0
<COMMON>                                          739                      670
<OTHER-SE>                                    549,004                  580,463
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                1,814,744                1,553,319
<SALES>                                       724,451                  615,628
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              724,451                  615,628
<CGS>                                         357,186                  297,469
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 357,186                  297,469
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              249,606                  207,316
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  251                      241
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             83,592                   48,733
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (79,182)                      840
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (28,506)                      261
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (50,676)                      579
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0                        0
<CHANGES>                                    (12,161)                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (62,837)                      579
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.93)                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.93)                     0.01


</TABLE>
Pursuant to5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , th e court has determined that this opinionsho uld not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except und er the limit ed circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 09- 40012 C onfer enc e Cal endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f
- A pp el l ee v. J OR GE A L BE RT O MOL I NA- AL VA RD O , D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e S ou t h ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SDC N o . 2 : 0 8 - CR- 6 3 2 - ALL B ef ore W IE N E R , B E N AV ID E S , an d S T E W A R T , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * Th e Feder alPu bl i c D ef enderappoi nt ed t o r epr es ent Jor ge A lb e r t o M o l i naA lv a r d o (M o lin a ) h a s m o v e d fo r le a v e to w ith d r a w a n d h a s file d a b r ie f in ac c o r da nc e w i t h A n d er s v . C a lif o rn ia , 3 86 U . S . 7 38 ( 196 7) . M ol i n a ha s not f i l ed a respon se. O u r i n dep en den trevi ew of the rec ord an d coun sel ’ s bri ef di scl oses n o n on frivo l ou s is s u e fo r ap p ea l . A ccord i n gly, cou n sel’ s m oti on f or leav e to w i t hdr aw i s G RA N TE D , c o uns e li s e xc us e d f r o m f ur t he rr e s po ns ibi l i t i e s he r e i n, a n d th e A P P E A L IS D IS M IS S E D . S ee5 T H C IR . R. 42. 2. United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D October 20, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2482

Applica Water Products LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_05.09.19.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 38 (Monday, February 27, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 10634]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4931]





                Sunshine Act Meetings



Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 38 / Monday, February 27, 1995 / 
Sunshine Act Meetings
[[Page 10634]] 




UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE BOARD OF GOVERNORS

Notice of a Meeting

    The Board of Governors of the United States Postal Service, 
pursuant to its Bylaws (39 C.F.R. Section 7.5) and the Government in 
the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. Section 552b), hereby gives notice that it 
intends to hold a meeting at 1:00 p.m. on Monday, March 6, 1995, and at 
8:30 a.m. on Tuesday, March 7, and Wednesday, March 8, 1995, in 
Washington, D.C.
    The March 6 meeting is closed to the public. (See 60 FR 9078, 
February 16, 1995.) The March 8 meeting is also closed to the public 
and will consist entirely of briefings. The March 7 meeting is open to 
the public and will be held at U.S. Postal Service Headquarters, 475 
L'Enfant Plaza, S.W., in the Benjamin Franklin Room. The Board expects 
to discuss the matters stated in the agenda which is set forth below. 
Requests for information about the meeting should be addressed to the 
Secretary for the Board, David F. Harris, at (202) 268-4800.

Agenda

Monday Session

March 6-1:00 p.m. (Closed)

    1. Consideration of Mail Reclassification Case Filing with the 
Postal Rate Commission. (Gail G. Sonnenberg, Vice President, 
Marketing Systems, and Charles C. McBride, Manager, 
Reclassification.)
    2. Consideration of International Mail Rates and Services. (Mary 
S. Elcano, Senior Vice President and General Counsel.)

Tuesday Session

March 7--8:30 a.m. (Open)

    1. Minutes of the Previous Meeting, February 6-7, 1995.
    2. Remarks of the Postmaster General/Chief Executive Officer. 
(Marvin Runyon.)
    3. Status Report on Washington, D.C., Mail Service. (Henry A. 
Pankey, Vice President, Mid-Atlantic Area Operations.)
    4. Capital Investment.

    a. Washington-National Airport Mail Center (final decision). 
        (Henry A. Pankey, Vice President, Mid-Atlantic Area 
        Operations).

    5. Tentative Agenda for the April 3-4, 1995, meeting in 
Washington, D.C.
David F. Harris,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95-4931 Filed 2-23-95; 3:56 pm]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3697

JLG Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 52 (Friday, March 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 14440]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6565]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Meeting of the Board of Scientific Counselors

    Pursuant to Pub. L. 92-463, notice is hereby given of the meeting 
of the Board of Scientific Counselors, National Institute of Diabetes 
and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), April 26-28, 1995, National 
Institutes of Health, Building 5, Room 127, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.
    The meeting will be open to the public on April 26 from 7 p.m. to 
7:30 p.m. for discussions of policies of the NIDDK Intramural Research 
Program. Attendance by the public will be limited to space available.
    In accordance with the provisions set forth in sec. 552b(c)(6), 
Title 5, U.S.C. and sec. 10(d) of Pub. L. 92-463, the meeting will be 
closed to the public on April 26 from 7:30 p.m. to 10 p.m.; April 27 
from 8:30 a.m. to 6 p.m. and on April 28 from 9 a.m. to adjournment for 
the review, discussion and evaluation of individual intramural programs 
and projects conducted by the NIDDK, including consideration of 
personnel qualifications and performance, the competence of individual 
investigations, and similar items, disclosure of which would constitute 
a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    A summary of the meeting and roster of members will be provided, 
upon request, by the Committee Management Office, National Institute of 
Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Building 31, Room 9A07, 
Bethesda, Maryland 20892.
    For any further information, and for individuals who plan to attend 
and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or 
other reasonable accommodations, please contact Dr. Allen Spiegel, 
Scientific Review Administrator, Board of Scientific Counselors, 
National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Room 9N-222, Bethesda, 
Maryland 20892, (301) 496-4128, prior to the meeting.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No 93.847-849, 
Diabetes, Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases; Digestive Diseases and 
Nutrition; and Kidney Diseases, Urology and Hematology Research, 
National Institutes of Health.)

    Dated: March 13, 1995.
Margery G. Grubb,
Senior Committee Management Specialist, NIH.
[FR Doc. 95-6565 Filed 3-16-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 426 

To amend the Inspector General Act of 1978 relative to the powers of 

the Department of Justice Inspector General. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 24, 2021 

Mr. DURBIN (for himself, Mr. LEE, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. RUBIO, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. CRUZ, Mr. COONS, Mrs. 

BLACKBURN, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, and Ms. HIRONO) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Inspector General Act of 1978 relative to 

the powers of the Department of Justice Inspector General. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Inspector General Ac5 cess Act of 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INVESTIGATIONS OF DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

7 PERSONNEL. 

8 Section 8E of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 

9 U.S.C. App.) is amended— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 426 IS

1 (1) in subsection (b)— 

2 (A) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘and 

3 paragraph (3)’’; 

4 (B) by striking paragraph (3); 

5 (C) by redesignating paragraphs (4) and 

6 (5) as paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively; and 

7 (D) in paragraph (4), as redesignated, by 

8 striking ‘‘paragraph (4)’’ and inserting ‘‘para9 graph (3)’’; and 

10 (2) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘, except with 

11 respect to allegations described in subsection 

12 (b)(3),’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 10.4

        SJW CORP. ANNOUNCES SALE OF $50 MILLION SENIOR NOTES

     SAN JOSE, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--SJW Corp. (NYSE:SJW) today
announced the sale of $50 Million in aggregate principle amount of its
4.35% Senior Notes to an institutional investor in a private placement
transaction.

     The senior notes are unsecured and will mature on June 30, 2021.
Interest on the senior notes will accrue and be payable semi-annually in
arrears on December 30 and June 30 commencing on December 30, 2011 at the
rate of 4.35%.

     "The credit worthiness of SJW Corp. coupled with a historically low
interest rate environment presented us with the opportunity to secure
funding for our future financing needs at a very attractive price," said
W. Richard Roth, SJW Corp. President and Chief Executive Officer.  "Our
$50 Million sale of privately placed senior notes provides the company
with a long-term, competitively priced and cost effective source of
financing."

     SJW Corp. is a publicly traded holding company headquartered in San
Jose, California.  SJW Corp. is the parent company of San Jose Water
Company, SJWTX, Inc., Texas Water Alliance Limited, and SJW Land Company.
Together, San Jose Water Company and SJWTX, Inc. provide regulated and
nonregulated water service to more than one million people in San Jose,
California and nearby communities and in Canyon Lake, Texas and nearby
communities.  SJW Land Company owns and operates commercial real estate
investments.




    This press release may contain certain forward-looking statements
including but not limited to statements relating to SJW Corp.'s plans,
strategies, objectives, expectations and intentions, which are made
pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the U.S. Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  These forward-looking statements involve
known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause
the actual results, performance or achievements of SJW Corp. to be
materially different from any future results, performance or achievements
expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.  SJW Corp.
undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking
statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or
otherwise.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2473

MAG Specialties, Inc:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_5-30-2019.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
#### Pioneer Specialties Woodworking, Inc., Respondent-Appellant, v Edward Cohen et al., Appellants-Respondents, et al., Defendants. (And Third- and Fourth-Party Actions.) Lawrence A. Horowitz, Respondent-Appellant, v Edward Cohen et al., Appellants-Respondents, and Construction Artisans, Inc., Respondent, et al., Defendants. (And a Third-Party Action.)

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Stecher, J.), entered on April 24, 1989, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Martin Stecher, J., without costs and without disbursements. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Asch and Rubin, JJ.