alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 47 (Friday, March 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 13184]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5903]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Advisory Panel for Science, Technology & Society; Notice of 
Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meetings.

    Name: Advisory Panel for Science, Technology and Society 
(#1760).
    Date and Time: March 31, 1995, 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.; April 1, 
1995, 9:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.
    Place: Galleria Park Hotel--The Palm Room/Second Floor, 191 
Sutter Street, San Francisco, CA 94104, Telephone: (415) 781-3060--
FAX (415) 433-4409.
    Contact Person: Dr. Ronald J. Overmann, Program Director for 
Science Technology Studies, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone (703) 306-1743 Ext. 6989, 
Room 995.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate science and technology studies 
proposals as part of the selection process for awards.

    Date and Time: May 11-12, 1995--8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, Room 320--4201 Wilson 
Blvd.--Arlington, VA.
    Contact Person: Dr. Rachelle D. Hollander, Program Director for 
Ethics and Values Studies, National Science Foundation, Room 995, 
4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone (703) 306-1743 
Ext. 6991.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate ethics and values studies 
proposals as part of the selection process for awards.
    Type of Meetings: Closed.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning support for research proposals submitted to the National 
Science Foundation for financial support.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries, and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are within exemptions (4) and (6) of 5 
U.S.C. 552b(c), Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: March 6, 1995.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-5903 Filed 3-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
```
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

DONALD GLEN BRANSON, Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 17-0082 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Mohave County

No. S8015CR201101061

The Honorable Derek C. Carlisle, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Mohave County Attorney's Office, Kingman

By Matthew J. Smith

Counsel for Respondent

Donald Glen Branson, Florence

Petitioner

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge Lawrence F. Winthrop, Judge Diane M. Johnsen and Judge 

Maria Elena Cruz delivered the decision of the Court.

FILED 12-7-2017
STATE v. BRANSON

Decision of the Court

2

PER CURIAM: 

¶1 Petitioner Donald Glen Branson seeks review of the superior 

court's order denying his petition for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant 

to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is petitioner's first 

petition.

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will 

not disturb a superior court's ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief. 

State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner's burden to 

show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition 

for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, ¶ 1 (App. 2011) 

(petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior 

court's order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition 

for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of 

discretion. 

¶4 For the foregoing reasons, we grant review and deny relief.
#### STATE v. JOHNNIE BRYANT.

(Filed 29 October, 1952.)

Criminal Law §§ 57b, 67b—

An appeal does not lie from a discretionary denial of an application for a new trial on tbe ground of newly discovered evidence.

Appeal by defendant Jobnnie Bryant from *Burney, J.,*at August Term, 1952, of SampsoN.

Criminal prosecution upon four separate warrants eacb upon an affidavit charging defendant and another with larceny of chickens.

Yerdiet: “That said Johnnie Bryant is guilty of larceny of chickens.”

Judgment: Confinement in the common jail, etc.

On appeal therefrom to Supreme Court at Spring Term, 1952, no error was found. See 235 N.C. 420, 70 S.E. 2d 186.

Thereafter at the next succeeding term, August Term, 1952, of Superior Court of Sampson County, N. C., defendant filed, in writing, motion for a new trial on account of newly discovered evidence, — supporting same by certain affidavits. The presiding judge, after considering said written motion and affidavits filed, and an examination of the record of the case on appeal to Supreme Court, as aforesaid, denied the motion in his discretion.

From order in accordance therewith defendant appeals to Supreme Court, and assigns error.

*Attorney-General McMullan and Assistant Attorney-General Bruton for the State.*

*David J. Turlington, Jr., for defendant, appellant.*

’W’iNBORNE, J.

Appeal to the Supreme Court does not lie from a discretionary determination of an application for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. See *S. v. Suddreth,*230 N.C. 754, 55 S.E. 2d 690; also *S. v. Thomas,*227 N.C. 71, 40 S.E. 2d 412; *S. v. Rodgers,*217 N.C. 622, 8 S.E. 2d 927; *S. v. Lea,*203 N.C. 316 (at 322), 166 S.E. 292, and cases there cited. Also *S. v. Grass,*223 N.C. 859, 27 S.E. 2d 443; *S. v. Parker,*235 N.C. 302, 69 S.E. 2d 542.

Hence under the authority of these cases the appeal in the present case is

Dismissed.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-11482

Trio Engineered Products:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 50 (Wednesday, March 15, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14040-14041]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6344]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL RATE COMMISSION


Notice of Facility Visit

March 10, 1995.
    Members of the Commission and its advisory staff will visit the 
offices of [[Page 14041]] WEFA in Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania on 
Thursday, March 16, 1995. WEFA officials will explain the process of 
preparation of the economic model of direct response advertising it 
developed for the Direct Marketing Association. A report of the visit 
will be on file in the Docket Room of the Commission.
Margaret P. Crenshaw,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-6344 Filed 3-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-P
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 38 (Monday, February 27, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 10613]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4715]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[NAFTA-00261]


Mahan Western Industries, Inc., Leather and Heel Department A/K/A 
Miller Manufacturing Leather and Heel Department; El Paso, TX; Amended 
Certification Regarding Eligibility to Apply for NAFTA Transitional 
Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 250(a), Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title 
II, of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273), the 
Department of Labor issued a Certification for NAFTA Transitional 
Adjustment Assistance on November 22, 1994, applicable to all workers 
of the leather and heel department of the subject firm in El Paso, 
Texas.
    At the request of the State Agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The investigation 
findings show that the claimants' wages for Mahan Western Industries, 
Inc., are being reported under the Unemployment Insurance tax account 
for Miller Manufacturing, EL Paso, Texas.
    Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to 
properly reflect the correct worker group.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of Mahan Western Industries, Inc., formerly Miller 
Manufacturing in El Paso, Texas.
    The amended notice applicable to NAFTA--00261 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    ``All workers of the Leather and Heel Department of Mahan 
Western Industries, Inc., a/k/a Miller Manufacturing, Leather and 
Heel Department, El Paso, Texas who became totally or partially 
separated from employment on or after December 8, 1993 are eligible 
to apply for NAFTA-TAA under Section 250 of the Trade Act of 1974.''

    Signed in Washington, DC., this 16th day of February, 1995.
Victor J. Trunzo,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Service, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 95-4715 Filed 2-24-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-40666

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

IRINEO ESPINO-REYES

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:07-CR-77-ALL

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Irineo Espino-Reyes raises

arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S.

224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and

not a separate criminal offense. See United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d

624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (Aug. 28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The

appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of

the district court is AFFIRMED.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

November 8, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Vegetable Crops Research: Madison, WI
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    ScientistsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Madison, Wisconsin Vegetable Crops Research Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Research Projects Subjects of Investigation at this LocationEach ARS research project has related subjects of investigation.  Listed below are the subjects of investigation currently conducted at this location.
Clicking on a subject of investigation will list the research projects within that  subject of investigation.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
accompanying financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                    Jul-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                      Jun-30-2000
<CASH>                                            87,214
<SECURITIES>                                      6,000,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                     0
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  87,214
<PP&E>                                            4,009
<DEPRECIATION>                                    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    6,318,158
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             645,124
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       488,738
<COMMON>                                          104,534
<OTHER-SE>                                        5,024,864
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      6,318,158
<SALES>                                           11,249
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  11,249
<CGS>                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     847,357
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   0
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               0
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (836,108)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.02)



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
      32




**Certifications
      of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**









Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
      undersigned officers of LMI Aerospace, Inc., a Missouri corporation (the
“Company”), does hereby certify that, to the best of their
      knowledge:




The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the
      “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained
      in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the Company.







Date:
                August 11, 2006
            By:
            /s/
                Ronald S. SaksRonald
                S. Saks
              President
                and Chief Executive Officer
              (Principal
                Executive Officer)Date:
                August 11, 2006
            By:
            /s/
                Lawrence E. DickinsonLawrence
                E. Dickinson
              Chief
                Financial Officer and Secretary
              (Principal
                Financial and Principal Accounting
              Officer)
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 4, 2015

d0901

Order 

Clerk

September 4, 2015

151734(60) 

In re NORFLEET/WINBUSH-BEY/NEWTON- BEY/NORFLEET-BEY, Minors. SC: 151734

COA: 323116

Macomb CC Family Division:

2013-000398-NA;

2013-000399-NA;

2013-000400-NA;

2013-000401-NA;

2013-000402-NA

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s July 2, 2015 

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
#### EDDIE HORTON (Widower); J. L. HORTON and Wife, ELDRIE HORTON; RAY HORTON; P. S. HORTON and Wife, CARRIE JANE HORTON; THEODORE R. HORTON and Wife, VERA HORTON; EDDIE HORTON, Guardian of MARY LEE HORTON; JESSE W. HORTON, and MAY BELL HORTON, v. W. W. HORTON.

(Filed 17 March, 1937.)

Jury § 5—

Where the record does not show what admissions, if any, were made on the hearing, the decision of the court on a controverted issue raised by the pleadings, without the introduction of evidence, in the absence of waiver of jury trial or agreement as to facts, will be held for error.

Appeal by defendant from *Granmer, J.,*at September Term, 1936, of Harnett.

Error and remanded.

Plaintiffs alleged that defendant had agreed, in consideration of the conveyance to him by the plaintiffs of their equity of redemption in described lands, to pay off the mortgage debt thereon and hold the lands subject to their option to repurchase upon repayment to him of the debt, interest, and taxes, within three years; and plaintiffs further alleged that within the time limited, plaintiffs had tendered the amount to the defendant who refused to convey. Defendant in his answer admitted that he made an agreement substantially as alleged, but specifically denied that any tender of repayment of the debt and interest was made to him within the time limited or at any time.

The court, upon consideration of the pleadings and “upon the admissions of the parties,” found as a fact that within two years the money advanced by defendant to pay off the mortgage, interest, and taxes, was tendered to the defendant, and thereupon adjudged that equity raised a constructive trust, and that defendant held the land as trustee for the plaintiffs, and directed that he reconvey said lands to them upon the payment of the amounts advanced by him.

Defendant appealed.

*Wm. B. Oliver and J. Elsie Webb for plaintiffs.*

*J. 0. Sedberry for defendant.*

Per Curiam.

The record does not disclose what admissions, if any, were made at the hearing in the court below, and there being no waiver of jury trial or agreement as to facts nor evidence offered, the court was without power to decide a controverted issue of fact raised by the plead*391ings. Doubtless tbe effort to end an unseemly controversy between members of tbe same family led tbe learned judge into error.

Tbe case must be remanded for tbe proper determination of tbe material issues.

Error and remanded.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 7, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 12553]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5554]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[FE Docket No. 95-10-NG]


Phibro Division of Salomon, Inc.; Order Granting Blanket 
Authorization to Import Natural Gas From and Export Natural Gas to 
Mexico

AGENCY: Office of Fossil Energy, DOE.

ACTION: Notice of order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of Fossil Energy of the Department of Energy gives 
notice that it has issued an order granting Phibro Division of Salomon 
Inc. blanket authorization to import up to 200 Bcf of natural gas from 
Mexico and to export up to 200 Bcf of natural gas to Mexico over a two-
year term beginning on the date of first import or export.
    This order is available for inspection and copying in the Office of 
Fuels Programs docket room, 3F-056, Forrestal Building, 1000 
Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20585, (202) 586-9478. The 
docket room is open between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., 
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

    Issued in Washington, D.C., on February 28, 1995.
Clifford P. Tomaszewski,
Director, Office of Natural Gas, Office of Fuels Programs, Office of 
Fossil Energy.
[FR Doc. 95-5554 Filed 3-6-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Lawyer Media, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), William L.
Pollak, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Stephen C. Jacobs, as
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ William L. Pollak
------------------------------
William L. Pollak
Chief Executive Officer
May 14, 2003


/s/ Stephen C. Jacobs
------------------------------
Stephen C. Jacobs
Chief Financial Officer
May 14, 2003