alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

October 18, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2057

CTI Industries Corporation:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 40 (Wednesday, March 1, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 11080]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4944]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-168-000]


Alabama-Tennessee Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes 
in FERC Gas Tariff

February 23, 1995.
    Take notice that on February 21, 1995, Alabama-Tennessee Natural 
Gas Company (Alabama-Tennessee), filed pursuant to Section 33.2 of the 
General Terms and Conditions of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised 
Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet, with a proposed effective 
date of April 1, 1995:

Sub. Third Revised Sheet No. 4B

    According to Alabama-Tennessee, its filing provides for the 
recovery of a positive balance in its Account No. 191 as a result of 
certain refunds and credits made by Alabama-Tennessee to its sales 
customers. Alabama-Tennessee proposes to collect this balance through a 
direct bill to each affected customer and is seeking authorization to 
reflect the entire amount due in the bills to be rendered in May, 1995 
for services provided in April, 1995.
    In the event that the Commission does not accept and approve its 
filing, Alabama-Tennessee requests that it be permitted to revise its 
pre-636 purchased gas cost calculations to eliminate completely the 
effect of retainage on its PGA.
    Alabama-Tennessee has requested that the Commission grant such 
waivers as may be necessary to accept and approve the filing as 
submitted.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, DC 
20426, in accordance with Rule 211 or Rule 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before March 2, 1995. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party to the 
proceeding must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are 
on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-4944 Filed 2-28-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-2510

HP Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3082

Mabuchi Motor America Corp:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_05.09.19.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
Exhibit No. 10.1




                                            January 31, 2003






UNITED RETAIL GROUP, INC.
UNITED RETAIL INCORPORATED
CLOUDWALKERS, INC.
365 West Passaic Street
Rochelle Park, NJ 07662

Gentlemen:

We refer to the Financing agreement between us dated August 15, 1997, as
amended (herein the "Financing Agreement"). Capitalized terms used and not
otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings specified therein unless
otherwise specifically defined herein.

This letter is to confirm that pursuant to mutual consent and understanding,
effective as of the date hereof, the definition of "Cumulative Excess Cash
Flow" as defined to in Section 1 of the Financing Agreement shall be, and
hereby is, deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following:

         "Cumulative Excess Cash Flow shall mean EBITDA after August 2, 1997
         minus Interest Expense minus income taxes paid in cash plus income
         tax refunds received in cash minus principal payments on Indebtedness
         minus non-financed Capital Expenditures plus $2,500,000 for
         computation under this Financing Agreement prior to March 1, 2003."

In consideration of the foregoing amendment and the preparation of this
agreement by our in-house counsel you agree to pay to us an accommodation fee
of $5,000, which may be charged to your account under the Financing Agreement
on the date hereof.

Except as herein specifically provided, the Financing Agreement remains in
full force and effect in accordance with its terms and no other changes in the
terms or provisions of the Financing Agreement is intended or implied. If you
are in agreement with the foregoing, please so indicate by signing and
returning to us the enclosed copy of this letter.

                                             Very truly yours,

                                             THE CIT GROUP/BUSINESS
                                             CREDIT, INC., as Agent and Lender


                                             By: /s/ Steven Schuit
                                                 ---------------------
                                                  Vice President
                                                  Team Leader

Read and Agreed to:

UNITED RETAIL GROUP, INC.

By: /s/ George Remeta
    --------------------------
    Vice Chairman

UNITED RETAIL INCORPORATED

By: /s/ Kenneth P. Carroll
    --------------------------
    President

CLOUDWALKERS, INC.

By: /s/ Julie L. Daly
    --------------------------
     Vice President
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 7, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 12530]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5492]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 95-29, RM-8596]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Iron Mountain, MI

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document requests comments on a petition filed by 
Superior Media Group, Inc., proposing the allotment of Channel 294A to 
Iron Mountain, Michigan, as that community's third local FM service. 
The channel can be allotted to Iron Mountain without a site restriction 
at coordinates 45-49-12 and 88-04-06. Canadian concurrence will be 
requested for this allotment.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before April 24, 1995, and reply 
comments on or before May 9, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, D.C. 20554. 
In addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should 
serve the petitioner's counsel, as follows: Matthew H. McCormick, 
Reddy, Begley, Martin & McCormick, 1001 22nd Street, NW, Suite 350, 
Washington, D. C. 20037.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Scheuerle, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Notice 
of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 95-29, adopted February 21, 
1995, and released March 2, 1995. The full text of this Commission 
decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business 
hours in the Commission's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, 
NW, Washington, D.C. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, International 
Transcription Services, Inc., 2100 M Street, NW, Suite 140, Washington, 
D.C. 20037, (202) 857-3800.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of l980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contact.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 95-5492 Filed 3-6-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 7, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 12548]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5499]



[[Page 12548]]

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

[Project No. 349-030 Alabama]


Alabama Power Co.; Notice of Availability of Draft Environmental 
Assessment

March 1, 1995.
    An environmental assessment (EA) is available for public review. 
The EA is an application for Non-project Use of Project Land and Water 
for the Martin Dam Hydroelectric Project. The EA finds that approval of 
the application would not constitute a major federal action 
significantly affecting the human environment. The Martin Dam 
Hydroelectric Project is located on the Tallapoosa River in Elmore 
County, Alabama.
    The EA was written by staff in the Office of Hydropower Licensing, 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Copies of the EA can be viewed at 
the Commission's Reference and Information Center, Room 3308, 941 North 
Capitol Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. Copies can also be obtained 
by calling the project manager, Jon Cofrancesco at (202) 219-0079.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-5499 Filed 3-6-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**Exhibit        32**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

| DATE: December 15, 2005  | By: /s/ Anna E. Gluskin                                                                                                  |
|-------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                          | Anna                    E. Gluskin, Chief Executive Officer(Principal                    Executive Officer)              |
|                          |                                                                                                                     |
|                          |                                                                                                                     |
|                          |                                                                                                                     |
| DATE: December 15, 2005  | By: /s/ Rose C. Perri                                                                                                    |
|                          | Rose                    C. Perri, Chief Financial Officer(Principal                    Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|                          |                                                                                                                     |

----
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 42 (Friday, March 3, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11970-11971]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5304]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-4720-8]


Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of 
EPA Comments

    Availability of EPA comments prepared January 30, 1995 through 
February 03, 1995 pursuant to the Environmental Review Process (ERP), 
under Section 309 of the Clean Air Act and Section 102(2)(c) of the 
National Environmental Policy Act as amended. Requests for copies of 
EPA comments can be directed to the Office of Federal Activities at 
(202) 260-5076.
    An explanation of the ratings assigned to draft environmental 
impact statements (EISs) was published in the Federal Register dated 
April 10, 1994 (59 FR 16807).

Draft EISs

    ERP No. D-AFS-J31024-UT Rating EO2, Blanchett Park Dam and 
Irrigation Reservoir, Construction and Operation, Uintah Water 
Conservancy District (UWCD), Special-Use-Permit and COE Section 404 
Permit, Ashley National Forest, Vernal Ranger District, Uintah County, 
UT.

Summary

    EPA supported the USFS selection of No Action as the agency 
preferred alternative. EPA expressed environmental objections with the 
build alternative due to the unmitigable impacts to over 50 acres of 
montane peat fen and loss of a portion of a genetically pure native 
salmonid population.
    ERP No. D-AFS-L65235-ID Rating EO2, Boise River Wildfire Recovery 
Project, Implementation, North Fork Boise River and Mores Creek 
Drainages, Boise National Forest, Idaho City and Mountain Home Ranger 
Districts, Boise and Elmore Counties, ID. [[Page 11971]] 

Summary

    EPA expressed objections to the sale's potential effect on water 
quality. Additional information is needed on cumulative effects, water 
quality/fish habitat effectiveness monitoring and documentation for 
environmental effort predictions.
    ERP No. D-AFS-L81011-AK Rating LO, Helicopter Glacier Landing 
Tours, Implementation, Issuance of Special-Use-Permits, Tongass 
National Forest, Chatham Area, Juneau Ranger District, Alaska.

Summary

    EPA had no objection to the proposed action.

Final EISs

    ERP No. F-BLM-L67027-ID Stone Cabin Open Pit Gold and Silver Mine 
Development and Operation, Plan of Operations Approval and NPDES Permit 
Issuance, Florida Mountain, Boise District, Owyhee County, ID.

Summary

    EPA continued to have environmental concerns with the preferred 
alternative. EPA's concerns are based on the proposed mitigation plan 
for the COE Section 404 permit application for wetland fill and on the 
effectiveness of the proposed treatment technology at the Delamar mine 
site.

    Dated: February 28, 1995.
B. Katherine Biggs,
Associate Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal 
Activities.
[FR Doc. 95-5304 Filed 3-2-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-U
EXHIBIT 23.1

INDEPENDENT
AUDITORS CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-94026, 33-51234, 33-75028, 33-77684, 33-57628,
33-80581, 33-80583, 333-42775, 333-89325, 333-89329 and 333-89327 of Apria Healthcare
Group Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated February 16, 2004 (which report expresses an
unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to a change in accounting
for goodwill and other intangible assets), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Apria Healthcare Group Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Costa Mesa, CaliforniaMarch
15, 2004
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3657 

To require the Director of National Intelligence to provide notification to 

Congress of abandoned United States military equipment used in terrorist attacks. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2022 

Mr. THUNE (for himself, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. COTTON, Mr. 

CRUZ, Mr. DAINES, Ms. ERNST, Mr. HOEVEN, Mrs. HYDE-SMITH, Mr. 

SULLIVAN, and Mr. BRAUN) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Select Committee on Intelligence 

A BILL 

To require the Director of National Intelligence to provide 

notification to Congress of abandoned United States military equipment used in terrorist attacks. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NOTIFICATION OF ABANDONED UNITED 

4 STATES MILITARY EQUIPMENT USED IN TER5 RORIST ATTACKS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after any 

7 element of the intelligence community (as defined in sec8 tion 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3657 IS

1 3003)) determines that United States military equipment 

2 abandoned or otherwise left unsecured in Afghanistan, 

3 Iraq, or Syria has been used in a terrorist attack against 

4 the United States, allies or partners of the United States, 

5 or local populations, the Director of National Intelligence 

6 shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress 

7 a written notification of such determination that includes 

8 any known details relating to— 

9 (1) the equipment used in the attack; 

10 (2) the date on which, and the location from 

11 which, the equipment left United States custody; 

12 (3) attribution for the orchestrators of the at13 tack; and 

14 (4) the total number of deaths and casualties 

15 caused by the attack. 

16 (b) APPROPRIATE COMMITTEES OF CONGRESS DE17 FINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘appropriate commit18 tees of Congress’’ means— 

19 (1) the Committee on Armed Services, the Se20 lect Committee on Intelligence, and the Sub21 committee on Defense of the Committee on Appro22 priations of the Senate; and 

23 (2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Per24 manent Select Committee on Intelligence, and the 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3657 IS

1 Subcommittee on Defense of the Committee on Ap2 propriations of the House of Representatives. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3909 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make employers of spouses 

of military personnel eligible for the work opportunity credit. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 23, 2022 

Mr. KAINE (for himself, Mr. BOOZMAN, Ms. HASSAN, and Mr. ROUNDS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make 

employers of spouses of military personnel eligible for 

the work opportunity credit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Military Spouse Hiring 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY OF SPOUSES OF MILITARY PERSONNEL 

7 FOR THE WORK OPPORTUNITY CREDIT. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 51(d) of 

9 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3909 IS

1 ‘‘or’’ at the end of subparagraph (I), by striking the period 

2 at the end of subparagraph (J) and inserting ‘‘, or’’, and 

3 by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

4 ‘‘(K) a qualified military spouse.’’. 

5 (b) QUALIFIED MILITARY SPOUSE.—Subsection (d) 

6 of section 51 of such Code is amended by adding at the 

7 end the following new paragraph: 

8 ‘‘(16) QUALIFIED MILITARY SPOUSE.—The 

9 term ‘qualified military spouse’ means any individual 

10 who is certified by the designated local agency as 

11 being (as of the hiring date) a spouse of a member 

12 of the Armed Forces of the United States.’’. 

13 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

14 this section shall apply to amounts paid or incurred after 

15 the date of the enactment of this Act to individuals who 

16 begin work for the employer after such date. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS