Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 50 / Wednesday, March 15, 1995 / Rules and Regulations 13915

Any person adversely affected by this

regulation may, within 30 days after

publication of this document in the

Federal Register, file written objections

to the regulation and may also request

a hearing on those objections.

Objections and hearing requests must be

filed with the Hearing Clerk, at the

address given above (40 CFR 178.20). A

copy of the objections and/or hearing

requests filed with the Hearing Clerk

should be submitted to the OPP docket

for this rulemaking. The objections

submitted must specify the provisions

of the regulation deemed objectionable

and the grounds for the objections (40

CFR 178.25). Each objection must be

accompanied by the fee prescribed by

40 CFR 180.33(i). If a hearing is

requested, the objections must include a

statement of the factual issue(s) on

which a hearing is requested, the

requestor’s contentions on such issues,

and a summary of any evidence relied

upon by the objector (40 CFR 178.27). A

request for a hearing will be granted if

the Administrator determines that the

material submitted shows the following:

There is genuine and substantial issue

of fact; there is a reasonable possibility

that available evidence identified by the

requestor would, if established, resolve

one or more of such issues in favor of

the requestor, taking into account

uncontested claims or facts to the

contrary; and resolution of the factual

issue(s) in the manner sought by the

requestor would be adequate to justify

the action requested (40 CFR 178.32).

Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR

51735, Oct. 4, 1993), the Agency must

determine whether the regulatory action

is ‘‘significant’’ and therefore subject to

all the requirements of the Executive

Order (i.e., Regulatory Impact Analysis,

review by the Office of Management and

Budget (OMB)). Under section 3(f), the

order defines ‘‘significant’’ as those

actions likely to lead to a rule (1) having

an annual effect on the economy of $100

million or more, or adversely and

materially affecting a sector of the

economy, productivity, competition,

jobs, the environment, public health or

safety, or State, local, or tribal

governments or communities (also

known as ‘‘economically significant’’);

(2) creating serious inconsistency or

otherwise interfering with an action

taken or planned by another agency; (3)

materially altering the budgetary

impacts of entitlement, grants, user fees,

or loan programs; or (4) raising novel

legal or policy issues arising out of legal

mandates, the President’s priorities, or

the principles set forth in this Executive

Order.

Pursuant to the terms of this

Executive Order, EPA has determined

that this rule is not ‘‘significant’’ and is

therefore not subject to OMB review.

Pursuant to the requirements of the

Regulatory Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96-

354, 94 Stat. 1164, 5 U.S.C. 601-612),

the Administrator has determined that

regulations establishing new tolerances

or raising tolerance levels or

establishing exemptions from tolerance

requirements do not have a significant

economic impact on a substantial

number of small entities. A certification

statement to this effect was published in

the Federal Register of May 4, 1981 (46

FR 24950).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180

Environmental protection,

Administrative practice and procedure,

Agricultural commodities, Pesticides

and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping

requirements.

Dated: March 3, 1995.

Stephen L. Johnson,

Director, Registration Division, Office of

Pesticide Programs.

Therefore, 40 CFR part 180 is

amended as follows:

PART 180—AMENDED

1. The authority citation for part 180

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 21 U.S.C. 346a and 371.

2. In § 180.449, by revising paragraph

(b), to read as follows:

§ 180.449 Avermectin B1 and its delta-8,9-

isomer; tolerances for residues.

* * * * *

(b) Tolerances are established for the

combined residues of the insecticide

avermectin B1 and its delta-8,9-isomer [a

mixture of avermectin containing

greater than 80 percent avermectin B1a

(5-O-demethyl avermectin A1a) and less

than 20 percent avermectin B1b (5-Odemethyl-25-di(1-methylpropyl)-25-(1-

methylethyl) avermectin A1a)] in or on

the following commodities:

Commodity Parts per

million

Celery ........................................ 0.05

Lettuce, head ............................ 0.05

Strawberry ................................. 0.02

Tomatoes, fresh ........................ 0.01

[FR Doc. 95–6416 Filed 3–14–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–F

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

43 CFR Public Land Order 7124

[NM–930–1430–01; NMNM 88049]

Public Land Order No. 7067,

Correction; Withdrawal of National

Forest System Land for Guadalupe

Canyon Zoological Botanical Area;

New Mexico

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management,

Interior.

ACTION: Public land order.

SUMMARY: This order will correct an

error in the land description in Public

Land Order No. 7067.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 15, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jeanette Espinosa, BLM New Mexico

State Office, P.O. Box 27115, Santa Fe,

New Mexico 87502, 505–438–7597.

By virtue of the authority vested in

the Secretary of the Interior by Section

204 of the Federal Land Policy and

Management Act of 1976, 43 U.S.C.

1714 (1988), it is ordered as follows:

The land description in Public Land

Order 7067, 59 FR 35859, July 14, 1994,

is hereby corrected as follows:

The third column, line 3, which reads

‘‘sec. 24, NE1⁄4NW1⁄4 and S1⁄2SE1⁄4;’’ is

hereby corrected to read ‘‘sec. 24,

NE1⁄4SE1⁄4 and S1⁄2SE1⁄4;’’.

Dated: March 2, 1995.

Bob Armstrong,

Assistant Secretary of the Interior.

[FR Doc. 95–6279 Filed 3–14–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–FB–P

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 24

[GEN Docket No. 90–314, ET Docket No.

92–100, FCC 95–92]

Personal Communications Service

AGENCY: Federal Communications

Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; petition for

reconsideration.

SUMMARY: On March 3, 1995, the

Commission released a Memorandum

Opinion and Order revising certain

sections of its Rules governing the

Personal Communications Services

(PCS). The action in the instant Order

responds to petitions for reconsideration

filed by Morgan Stanley Partnerships on

September 6 and October 7, 1994 in the

Commission’s broadband and