# Patent

## Title
Measuring node proximity on graphs with side information

## Abstract

In a computerized data mining context, user input relating to positive and negative information is incorporated into node proximity measurements on a weighted, directed graph. Starting from a source node, links are added to nodes for which positive feedback is received. Where negative information is received, a sink node is substituted for nodes receiving negative information. Nodes neighboring that sink node have links added to the sink. These changes yield an altered graph. Afterwards, proximity information is determined from the altered graph.

## Background
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
The present invention is related to the following commonly-owned, co-pending U.S. patent application filed on even date herewith, the entire content and disclosure of which is expressly incorporated by reference herein as if fully set forth herein. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/638,514, for “EFFICIENT CALCULATION OF NODE PROXIMITY ON GRAPHS WITH SIDE INFORMATION”.
BACKGROUND
The invention relates to the field of computerized systems and methods using graphs that include nodes, directed links, and link weights. In particular, the invention relates to applications where node proximity measurements are desired.
The invention is particularly useful in the field of graph mining. This field commonly applies to Internet applications such as recommendation systems and blog analysis. The fields of neighborhood search, center-piece sub-graphs, and image caption are also implicated.
In Internet database applications, data may be stored in the form of a graph including nodes, links (also called edges), and link weights. This structure shows relationships between pieces of information. These relationships can reflect how users perceive data. For instance, it is commonly desired to present new information to users that might be related to information previously accessed or products previously purchased. The behavior of the current user and/or other users may be used to predict interest in new information. Predictions of such interest can come from proximity measurements of the underlying graph structure.
The graph may be embodied as a matrix data structure on a machine readable medium. Proximity may be measured using a random walk algorithm.
A related work in this field is H. Tong, C. Faloutsos, and J.-Y. Pan, “Random Walk with Restart: Fast Solutions and Applications,” Knowledge and information systems, an International Journal (KAIS) 2008 (“RWR paper”). This paper is incorporated by reference, and relates to matrix representations of graphs and using random walk with restart to measure proximity in such graphs. The paper proposes an improvement to the random walk algorithm, summarized in algorithm 3a shown in FIG. 13. Algorithm 3a includes a pre-compute stage and an online query stage. The pre-compute stage includes calculating a low rank approximation in accordance with algorithm 3b, shown in FIG. 13.
SUMMARY
One issue to be solved in this context is how to incorporate side information, especially positive and negative user feedback into these graphs and proximity calculations. Side information can be gleaned in numerous ways. For instance, in recommendation systems, side information could be user ratings of content. In blog analysis, it could be opinions and sentiments. Click-through data can also reflect user preferences.
Advantageously a computer method will include performing operations in at least one data processing device. The operations will include:
embodying on at least one machine readable medium a representation of at least one graph representation of data, the representation comprising respective pluralities of nodes, links, and link weights;
receiving user input denoting positive and/or negative feedback with respect to at least one node in the graph;
altering at least one link and/or link weight in the embodiment of the graph, responsive to the feedback, in order to yield an altered graph; and
presenting a machine readable embodiment of a proximity value between a source and target node responsive to the altered graph.
Advantageously a system will include:
at least one data processing device;
at least one network and/or user interface device for communicating with the data processing device; and
at least one medium for embodying at least machine executable code and data in machine readable form; the code comprising instructions for causing the data processing device to perform operations on the data.
Where the operations will be the same as for the method listed above.
Advantageously, there will be a computer program product for performing operations. The computer program product will include a storage medium readable by a processing circuit and storing instructions to be run by the processing circuit for performing a method. The method will be as described above.



BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Embodiments will now be described by way of non-limiting example with respect to the following figures.
FIG. 1 shows a general system diagram.
FIG. 2 is a table of symbols.
FIG. 3 shows a graph with respect to which side information has been received.
FIG. 4 shows an adjacency matrix for the graph of FIG. 3.
FIG. 5 shows the graph of FIG. 3 altered responsive to side information.
FIG. 6 shows an altered adjacency matrix responsive to the altered graph of FIG. 5.
FIG. 7 shows a graph of proximity scores before side information is processed.
FIG. 8 shows a graph of proximity scores after side information is processed.
FIG. 9 shows an overview flowchart of a method for incorporating side information to alter a graph.
FIG. 10 shows a more detailed flowchart relating to altering a graph in response to side information.
FIG. 11 shows an algorithm for adding links for negative nodes.
FIG. 12 shows an algorithm for updating random walk with restart results responsive to side information.
FIG. 13 shows a prior art algorithm for random walk with restart.
FIG. 14 shows an overview flowchart for altering random walk with restart results responsive to side information.
FIG. 15 shows a flowchart with more detail relating to FIG. 14.
FIG. 16 shows a more detailed algorithm relating to FIGS. 14 and 15.
FIG. 17 gives an equation.



DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
More information about the invention, especially test results, appears in Tong, H., Qu, H., and Jamjoom, H. “Measuring Proximity on Graphs with Side Information,” Proceedings of the 2008 Eighth IEEE international Conference on Data Mining (Dec. 15-19, 2008). ICDM. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, D.C., 598-607 (“Side Information Paper”), which is incorporated herein by reference. This paper is not prior art, because it was published less than one year prior to the filing of the present application.
A Definition of a Problem
FIG. 1 shows a computer system suitable for running the invention. The system includes a processor 101, which may be of any suitable type. On the processor, modules are in operation, in particular at least one application program 102 and a graph maintenance module 103. The invention relates to improved operation of the graph maintenance module 103. The processor 101 communicates with a user interface 104—via some transmission medium 105, which may be wired or wireless and may include a network such as the Internet. The user interface 104 may include a screen with some user friendly graphical user interface, a keyboard, a pointing device, a microphone, a camera, voice recognition software, or any other suitable devices for transmitting or receiving information to or from a user. Processor(s) 101 make use of one or more media 106 to store data and computer program code. Any data structures referred to herein, such as matrices, scalars, and vectors are to be understood as embodied in machine readable form in at least one medium 106. Such media might be of any suitable type, such as magnetic, electronic, solid state, or optical. The various components of the system of FIG. 1 need not be in the same premises in order to cooperate with one another. Elements illustrated in the figure as singular may in practice be plural and cooperating together. Elements illustrated as separate may in practice be integrated together.
Table 1, shown in FIG. 2 lists the main symbols used herein and their associated definitions. An adjacency matrix, A, represents a general graph. Capital letters, e.g. A, represent matrices, lower case bold represent vectors, e.g. a, and calligraphic fonts represent sets, e.g. I. The tilde, “ ̃” indicates a matrix with side information added. For example, A is the normalized adjacency matrix of the graph without side information; and Ã is the normalized adjacency matrix of the graph refined by side information. A(i, j) is the element at the ith row and jth column of the matrix A, and A(:, j) is the jth column of A, etc. A running example, depicted in FIG. 3, describes the problem statement. There, each node represents a person. For instance, node 1 is ‘John’, node 2 is ‘Smith’, etc. The existence of an edge or link represents some social contact between the two corresponding people, e.g., a phone call. In traditional settings of proximity measurement, the goal is to quantify the closeness, i.e., relevance, between two nodes based on the link structure of the underlying graph. Then when the proximity of two nodes is measured, one will be considered the “source,” or the node measured from—and the other will be considered the “target,” namely the node measured to. The terms “link” and “edge” will be used interchangeably herein.
A challenge is to incorporate side information, especially user like/dislike feedback. In the running example, a user might not want to see node 6 but favors node 4. Two sets  and  formally represent positive and side information. The set  contains the node indices that users like—referred to as the “positive set,” in which the corresponding nodes are referred to as “positive nodes”. The set  contains the node indices that users dislike referred as “negative set,” in which the corresponding nodes are referred to as “negative nodes”. In the running example, both the positive set  and the negative set  contain one single element, respectively: ={4} and ={6}. In a practical example these sets might have more or less members. It is desirable to incorporate such side information to measure the node proximity (e.g., the proximity from node 1 to the node 3 in the example).
With the above notations and assumptions in mind, one embodiment of a formal problem statement is given as problem 1 below.
Problem 1 (Proximity with Side Information)
Given: a weighted direct graph A, a source node s and a target node t, and side information  and 
Find: the proximity score {tilde over (r)}s,t from source node s to target node t.
In problem 1, if the target node t is absent, the proximity scorer {tilde over (r)}s,t (i=1, . . . , n) from the source node measures proximity from s to all the other nodes in the graph. A column vector {tilde over (r)}s={tilde over (r)}s,t (i=1, . . . , n) that is a stack of proximity scores is equivalent to computing the ranking vector {tilde over (r)}s for the source node s. For simplicity of description here, the examples will take the positive set and negative sets as non-overlapping, i.e., ∩=φ. Overlapping nodes are normally ignored if they exist in both positive set and negative set without further information. Also, the positive and negative side information do not need to exist simultaneously. For example, if there is only positive side information, the negative set can be empty (i.e., =φ).
ProSINTM
This section will introduce proximity measurement with side information, denoted ProSINTM, for convenience. The description will begin with a review of random walk with restart (RWR), which is a known proximity measurement for the case where there is no side information. An extension of RWR to properly account for side information will follow.
RWR: Proximity without Side Information
Random walk with restart (RWR) is a method for measuring proximity. For a given graph, RWR will now be explained. Consider a random particle that starts from node i. The particle iteratively transits to its neighbors with probabilities proportional to the corresponding edge weights. At each step, the particle can return to node i with some restart probability (1−c). The proximity score from node i to node j is defined as the steady-state probability that the particle will be on node j. More on this topic may be found in J.-Y. Pan, H.-J. Yang, C. Faloutsos, and P. Duygulu. “Automatic multimedia cross-modal correlation discovery,” Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 653-658, (Seattle, Wash., Aug. 22-25, 2004)
Intuitively, ri,j is the fraction of time that the particle starting from node i will spend on each node j of the graph, after an infinite number of steps. A stack of all the proximity scores ri,j into a column ri is the “ranking vector” for the node i. Equation (1) of FIG. 17 gives the formal definition of RWR.
For the running example in FIG. 3, the normalized adjacency matrix A is shown in FIG. 4. Setting side information to the correct column vector, e.g. e1=[1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]′ allows for temporarily ignoring side information for node 1). Then the corresponding ranking vector can be found using equation (1). FIG. 7 plots the elements of the ranking vector—sorted from highest to lowest—for node 1 of the running example. In other words, the proximity score is graphed against the rank for given nodes. The proximity scores are normalized so that they sum up to 1. The scores are consistent with intuition. In other words, nodes that look near node 1, such as nodes 9, 2, and 5, in fact receive higher proximity scores.
ProSINTM: Proximity with Side Information
It is desirable to incorporate side information to measure the node proximity. Intuitively, for a given source node s, if positive nodes exist, the proximity score from the source node to such positive nodes as well as their neighboring nodes should increase, compared to the case where such side information is unavailable. In the running example, if node 4 belongs to the positive set , the proximity score from the source node 1 to node 4 ought to increase, as should the proximity scores from node 1 to node 4's neighboring nodes (e.g., node 2 and node 3). Analogously, if negative nodes exist, the proximity scores from the source node to such negative nodes as well as their neighboring nodes should decrease, compared to the case where such side information is unavailable. In the running example, if node 6 belongs to the negative set  the proximity score from node 1 to node 6 ought to decrease, and so will node 6's neighboring nodes (such as nodes 5 and 7). The basic idea of ProSINTM is then to use side information to refine the original graph structure so that the random particle (a) has higher chances of visiting the positive nodes and their neighboring nodes, and (b) has lower chances of visiting the negative nodes and their neighboring nodes.
Dealing with Positive Nodes.
Each node x in the positive set () is to link directly from the source node. For instance, in the running example, source node 1 will link directly to node 4, shown at 505 in FIG. 5. In this way, whenever the random particle visits (or restarts from) the source s, it has higher chances of visiting the nodes in the positive set. This direct linkage implicitly increases the chance that the random particle will visit the neighborhood of those positive nodes. The weight of each newly added link is set to 1/(ns+n+). For example, the newly added edge (1, 4) for the running example will receive a weight of 0.25 (since n1=3 and n+=1).
Dealing with Negative Nodes.
To deal with the negative nodes, per FIG. 5, preferably a sink 501 is introduced into the graph, with no out link. For each node y in the negative set  a direct link is inserted from node y to the sink. Thus, whenever the random particle visits this node, it can go to the sink and never come back, since there is no out link from the sink. Therefore, this negative node y is penalized and its corresponding proximity score will decrease. In order to penalize the neighborhood of node y, the present embodiment adds a direct link from its neighboring nodes to the sink. In the running example, besides the link 502 from node 6 (the negative node) to the sink, there will be links 503 and 504 from nodes 5 and 7 (the neighboring nodes of node 6) to the sink, respectively, as shown in FIG. 5. FIG. 6 shows the updated column normalized adjacency matrix resulting from the altered graph of FIG. 5.
The following topics will now be addressed:
(a) how to choose the neighborhood of a negative node y, and
(b) how to determine the weights to the sink.
With the index of the sink node being n+1, the procedure is summarized in Algorithm 1, shown in FIG. 11 and the flowchart of FIG. 9.
The flowchart of FIG. 9 shows conceptually a graph maintenance module 103 of FIG. 1 that can incorporate positive and negative information into a graph A. The method starts from a weighted, directed graph A, embodied in a machine readable medium, at 901 and a positive set  and a negative set , also embodied in a machine readable medium, at 902, and prior random walk results embodied on a machine readable medium at 905. A graph A is refined to become a refined graph 908 at 903, e.g. as shown in FIGS. 5 and 6. Then random walk is performed with restart on the refined graph 908 at 904 using the prior random walk results, embodied on the medium, at 905. Source and target information, embodied on a medium 907 are used to yield {tilde over (r)}s,t at 906. While 901, 902, 905, 907, and 908 are shown conceptually as being separate in this figure; they might be embodied in a single medium or spread across any number of suitable media of any type usable by host system 101.
Items illustrated as boxes in flowcharts herein might be implemented as software or hardware as a matter of design choice by the skilled artisan. Software might include sequential or parallel code, including objects and/or modules. Modules might be organized so that functions from more than one conceptual box are spread across more than one module or so that more than one conceptual box is incorporated in a single module.
FIG. 10 shows a flowchart that conceptually explains more about operation 903 from FIG. 9. At 1001, a link from the source node is added to each of the positive nodes x. At 1002, the sink node is added into the graph A. At 1003, a loop is implemented through the negative set . For each negative node y, neighbors are found at 1004. Then a link is added from negative node y is added to the sink at 1005 and then links are added from neighbors of y to the sink at 1006. Once the loop is finished, a random walk with restart is performed for the source node s on the refined graph at 1007 and the proximity score is the steady state probability that the random particle will finally stay at the target node t per 1008.
Algorithm 1, FIG. 11, gives more information about part of operations 1003-1006 from FIG. 10. Any algorithms given herein can be implemented as computer program code and stored on medium 106 to be performed on processor 101 as part of graph maintenance module 103, by the skilled artisan. Alternatively, they may be implemented as hardware. They are not intended to be executed manually or mentally. Initialization occurs at 11-1, where a refined graph Ã is initialized and an extra row and column of zeroes are added for temporary calculation purposes. Algorithm 1 calculates random walk with restart on the original graph at line 11-2. Then it determines the neighborhood of the negative node y at steps 11-3 and 11-4. At lines 11-5 and 11-6, it determines the weights of the newly added links to the sink. Lines 11-7 and 11-8 are formal loop end commands. At line 11-9, the algorithm discards the last row/column, which corresponds to the sink node. The last row/column is used to simplify the description of the proposed method without affecting the ranking vector, by simulating a sink node.
ProSINTM Algorithm.
Based on the preparations in algorithm 1, the algorithm to measure proximity with side information (ProSINTM) is given in Algorithm 2, see FIG. 12. In Algorithm 2, after initialization (line 12-1), side information is used to refine the graph structure: lines 12-2 through 12-7 for positive nodes per 1001; and lines 12-8 through 12-12 for negative nodes per 1003-1006. Line 12-3 ensures that the sth column of Ã sums up to 1. Line 12-10 uses the same original graph A to add links for each negative node y. It is assumed that all the negative nodes are obtained in a batch mode. In other words, there is no ordering among different negative nodes. Then, a random walk with restart is performed on the refined graph (Ã) for the source node s (per line 12-13 and reference 904 of FIG. 9). The final output is the corresponding steady state probability as the proximity score (line 12-14 and reference 906 of FIG. 9).
FIG. 8 plots elements of the ranking vector (sorted from highest to lowest) as a function of rank for node 1 of the running example with side information (={4}, and ={6}) per algorithms 1 and 2. FIG. 8 is like FIG. 7, except after a process in accordance with algorithms 1 and 2 has run. Comparing FIGS. 7 and 8, it can be seen that the positive node (node 4) has gained higher proximity scores as have neighboring nodes 2 and 3. The negative node (node 6) has received lower scores, along with its neighboring nodes (nodes 5 and 7).
Fast-ProSINTM
It is desirable to create a faster solution for ProSIN. NB-LIN is a fast algorithm to compute random walk with restart (the proximity without side information), per the RWR paper. NB-LIN is presented below and then extended to include side information.
Background: NB LIN for RWR
According to the definition of RWR (equation (1)), FIG. 17, inversion of an n×n matrix is necessary in order to solve for ri. This operation is prohibitively slow for large graphs. On the other hand, the iterative method (iterating equation (1) until convergence) might need many iterations, which is also not efficient. In RWR paper, the authors solve this problem using a low-rank approximation, followed by a matrix inversion of size l×l (where l is the rank of the low rank approximation) to get all possible proximity scores. Their solution, called NB LIN, can be further improved to allow side information.
Algorithm 3, FIG. 13, summarizes NB_LIN from the RWR paper. This algorithm is divided into two stages: NB_LIN_Pre( ) and NB_LIN_OQ( ). In NB_LIN_Pre( ) a low-rank approximation p1 is performed for the normalized adjacency matrix A using algorithm 3B of FIG. 13, which will not be repeated here, for brevity, as it appears in full in the figure.
Then, at p2, a matrix inversion is computed. Next, in NB_LIN_OQ( ) (line q1), only a small number of matrix-vector multiplications are computed to output the ranking vector.
The variable names used in algorithms 3A and 3B are local to those algorithms and do not overwrite values of the variables of the same in algorithm 4. They can only overwrite the parameters of the algorithm as called, per lines 16-6, 16-23, and 16-24.
FastProSINTM
Using only the method of the article of the RWR paper, i.e. FIG. 13, one would expect to have to perform the random walk with restart in two places in order to incorporate side information. First, one would have to process the original graph A (line 12-10 in Alg. 2); and then one would have to process the refined graph Ã to get the ranking vector for the source node (line 12-13 in Alg. 2). The straightforward solution would be to utilize NB_LIN twice, once for A and once for Ã. Unfortunately, this does not fit the expected usage model of side information, which requires being responsive to users' real-time interests. Imagine a user is querying an author-conference bipartite graph, and s/he wants to know “which conferences are most similar to KDD.” (Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining Conference) After the system gives the initial search results, s/he might further give her/his own preference—e.g., “dislike ICML” (International Conference on Machine Learning) and expect updated search results that matches her/his interests. This basically implies that calling NB_LIN_Pre( ) on the refined graph Ã is part of the on-line cost, which may pose a huge threat to the system's performance.
FIG. 14 is a flow-chart proposing a solution to this problem. From a weighted graph A 1401 and source and target notes (s, t), 1402, first a low rank approximation in accordance with algorithm 3B, FIG. 13—from the RWR paper—is run, along with a matrix inversion at 1403. Then, using a positive set  and a negative set  1404, the low rank approximation and matrix inversion are selectively updated at 1405. As a result, only a few matrix vector multiplications are performed at 1406 before the result {tilde over (r)}s,t is output at 1407.
FIG. 15 shows more detail of processing performed at 1405 and 1406. Reference 1501 corresponds to 1404 in the previous figure.
Fast-ProSINTM, which is given in Algorithm 4, FIG. 16, is a more detailed formulation of the method of FIG. 14 and FIG. 15. This algorithm yields the whole ranking vector {tilde over (r)}s,t for a given source node s, from which a single proximity score can be read out. For this formulation, it is assumed that both positive nodes and negative nodes are present. Fast-ProSINTM first calls NB_LIN_Pre( ) (p1, p2, Algorithm 3A of FIG. 13) on the original adjacency matrix A (line 16-2, 1403, FIG. 14). Per 1502, FIG. 15, Fast-ProSINTM then calls NB_LIN_OQ( ) (q1 Algorithm 3A of FIG. 13) to determine the influence of the negative nodes (lines 16-5 through 16-12, FIG. 16) and partial influence—i.e., scaling the sth column of the adjacency matrix by a factor of ns/(ns+n+) of positive nodes (line 16-13, FIG. 16)), both of which are used to update the low rank approximation (Ũ and {tilde over (V)}) as well as matrix Ã (1503, FIG. 15, lines 16-14 through 16-21, FIG. 16). This way, Fast-ProSINTM avoids directly calling the function NB_LIN_Pre( ) on the refined graph Ã, where it would need to do a low-rank approximation and a matrix inversion, both of which are not efficient with respect to on-line costs. Finally, Algorithm 4 calls NB LIN OQ( ) twice (lines 16-23 and 16-24, FIG. 16) and combines them as the final ranking result (line 16-25, FIG. 16) per 1506, FIG. 15. Note that the second call on e+ (line 16-24, FIG. 16) is used to compensate for the remaining influence of the positive nodes (i.e., adding new links from the source to the positive nodes) per 1505, FIG. 15, while line 16-23 corresponds to 1504, FIG. 15. This algorithm uses several intermediate value matrices X, Y, Θ, L, Ũ, {tilde over (V)}, {tilde over (Λ)}, whose values are defined in the algorithm. In the algorithm XΛV is the singular value decomposition of A, where Λ is a diagonal matrix. A result of the singular value decomposition is a low rank approximation.
A proof of the correctness of FastProSINTM appears in the Side Information Paper, as do experimental evaluations.
Although the embodiments of the present invention have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes and substitutions can be made therein without departing from spirit and scope of the inventions as defined by the appended claims. Variations described for the present invention can be realized in any combination desirable for each particular application. Thus particular limitations, and/or embodiment enhancements described herein, which may have particular advantages to a particular application need not be used for all applications. Also, not all limitations need be implemented in methods, systems and/or apparatus including one or more concepts of the present invention.
The present invention can be realized in hardware, software, or a combination of hardware and software. A typical combination of hardware and software could be a general purpose computer system with a computer program that, when being loaded and run, controls the computer system such that it carries out the methods described herein. The present invention can also be embedded in a computer program product, which comprises all the features enabling the implementation of the methods described herein, and which—when loaded in a computer system—is able to carry out these methods.
Computer program means or computer program in the present context include any expression, in any language, code or notation, of a set of instructions intended to cause a system having an information processing capability to perform a particular function either directly or after conversion to another language, code or notation, and/or reproduction in a different material form.
Thus the invention includes an article of manufacture which comprises a computer usable medium having computer readable program code means embodied therein for causing a function described above. The computer readable program code means in the article of manufacture comprises computer readable program code means for causing a computer to effect the steps of a method of this invention. Similarly, the present invention may be implemented as a computer program product comprising a computer usable medium having computer readable program code means embodied therein for causing a function described above. The computer readable program code means in the computer program product comprising computer readable program code means for causing a computer to affect one or more functions of this invention. Furthermore, the present invention may be implemented as a program storage device readable by machine, tangibly embodying a program of instructions executable by the machine to perform method steps for causing one or more functions of this invention.
The present invention may be implemented as a computer readable medium (e.g., a compact disc, a magnetic disk, a hard disk, an optical disk, solid state drive, digital versatile disc) embodying program computer instructions (e.g., C, C++, Java, Assembly languages, .Net, Binary code) run by a processor (e.g., Intel® CoreTM, IBM® PowerPC®) for causing a computer to perform method steps of this invention. The present invention may include a method of deploying a computer program product including a program of instructions in a computer readable medium for one or more functions of this invention, wherein, when the program of instructions is run by a processor, the computer program product performs the one or more of functions of this invention. The present invention may include a computer program product for performing one or more of functions of this invention. The computer program product comprises a storage medium (e.g., a disk drive, optical disc, solid-state drive, etc.) readable by a processing circuit (e.g., a CPU or processor core) and storing instructions run by the processing circuit for performing the one or more of functions of this invention.
It is noted that the foregoing has outlined some of the more pertinent objects and embodiments of the present invention. This invention may be used for many applications. Thus, although the description is made for particular arrangements and methods, the intent and concept of the invention is suitable and applicable to other arrangements and applications. It will be clear to those skilled in the art that modifications to the disclosed embodiments can be effected without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. The described embodiments ought to be construed to be merely illustrative of some of the more prominent features and applications of the invention. Other beneficial results can be realized by applying the disclosed invention in a different manner or modifying the invention in ways known to those familiar with the art.
The word “comprising”, “comprise”, or “comprises” as used herein should not be viewed as excluding additional elements. The singular article “a” or “an” as used herein should not be viewed as excluding a plurality of elements. Unless the word “or” is expressly limited to mean only a single item exclusive from other items in reference to a list of at least two items, then the use of “or” in such a list is to be interpreted as including (a) any single item in the list, (b) all of the items in the list, or (c) any combination of the items in the list. Ordinal terms in the claims, such as “first” and “second” are used for distinguishing elements and do not necessarily imply order of operation. The use of variable names in describing operations in a computer does not preclude the use of other variable names for achieving the same function. Items illustrated as boxes in flowcharts herein might be implemented as software or hardware as a matter of design choice by the skilled artisan. Software might include sequential or parallel code, including objects and/or modules. Modules might be organized so that functions from more than one conceptual box are spread across more than one module or so that more than one conceptual box is incorporated in a single module. Data and computer program code illustrated as residing on a medium might in fact be distributed over several media, or vice versa, as a matter of design choice.

## Claims

1. A computer method comprising performing operations in at least one data processing device, the operations comprising:
embodying on at least one machine readable medium a representation of at least one graph representation of data, the representation comprising respective pluralities of nodes, links, and link weights;
receiving user input denoting positive and/or negative feedback with respect to at least one node in the graph;
altering at least one link and/or link weight in the embodiment of the graph, responsive to the feedback, in order to yield an altered graph; and
presenting a machine readable embodiment of a proximity value between a source and target node responsive to the altered graph.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein
the feedback is negative with respect to at least one node y; and
the altering comprises
adding a sink node into the graph; and
for each negative node y:
finding neighbors of y;
adding a link from node y to the sink; and
adding a respective link from each neighboring node of node y to the sink.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein
the feedback is positive with respect to at least one node x; and
altering comprises adding a link from the source node to each positive node x.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein presenting a proximity value comprises performing a random walk with restart.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the operations further comprise presenting the proximity value as a ranking of content to a user.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the proximity value comprises a representation of a relationship between content.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the graph is a directed graph and the links have direction.

8. A system comprising:
at least one data processing device;
at least one network and/or user interface device for communicating with the data processing device;
at least one medium for embodying at least machine executable code and data in machine readable form; the code comprising instructions for causing the data processing device to perform operations on the data, the operations comprising
embodying on at least one machine readable medium a representation of at least one graph representation of data, the representation comprising respective pluralities of nodes, links, and link weights;
receiving user input denoting positive and/or negative feedback with respect to at least one node in the graph;
altering at least one link and/or link weight in the embodiment of the graph, responsive to the feedback, in order to yield an altered graph; and
presenting a machine readable embodiment of a proximity value between a source and target node responsive to the altered graph.

9. The system of claim 1, wherein
the feedback is negative with respect to at least one node y; and
the altering comprises
adding a sink node into the graph; and
for each negative node y:
finding neighbors of y;
adding a link from node y to the sink; and
adding a respective link from each neighboring node of node y to the sink.

10. The system of claim 8, wherein
the feedback is positive with respect to at least one node x; and
altering comprises adding a link from the source node to each positive node x.

11. The system of claim 8, wherein presenting a proximity value comprises performing a random walk with restart.

12. The system of claim 8, wherein the operations further comprise presenting the proximity value as a ranking of content to a user.

13. The system of claim 8, wherein the proximity value comprises a representation of a relationship between content.

14. A computer program product for performing operations, the computer program product comprising a storage medium readable by a processing circuit and storing instructions to be run by the processing circuit for performing a method comprising:
embodying on at least one machine readable medium a representation of at least one graph representation of data, the representation comprising respective pluralities of nodes, links, and link weights;
receiving user input denoting positive and/or negative feedback with respect to at least one node in the graph;
altering at least one link and/or link weight in the embodiment of the graph, responsive to the feedback, in order to yield an altered graph; and
presenting a machine readable embodiment of a proximity value between a source and target node responsive to the altered graph.

15. The program product of claim 14, wherein
the feedback is negative with respect to at least one node y; and
the altering comprises
adding a sink node into the graph; and
for each negative node y:
finding neighbors of y;
adding a link from node y to the sink; and
adding a respective link from each neighboring node of node y to the sink.

16. The program product of claim 14, wherein
the feedback is positive with respect to at least one node x; and
altering comprises adding a link from the source node to each positive node x.

17. The program product of claim 14, wherein presenting a proximity value comprises performing a random walk with restart.

18. The program product of claim 14, wherein the operations further comprise presenting the proximity value as a ranking of content to a user.

19. The program product of claim 14, wherein the proximity value comprises a representation of a relationship between content.