alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2554

Primex Family of Companies:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
#### HOWARD MARTIN, by His Next Friend, D. T. MARTIN, v. REIDSVILLE MOTOR COMPANY, Incorporated.

(Filed 10 November, 1931.)

Process D a — Action for abuse of process is properly nonsuited where the evidence shows that the case was orderly and regularly prosecuted.

Where a criminal action for false pretense has been nonsuited, but the evidence shows that it was regularly and orderly prosecuted according to the procedure therefor, and there is no evidence to the contrary, it will not sustain an action by the defendant therein for malicious abuse of process, and a motion as of nonsuit on the evidence in the civil action will be sustained on appeal. *Stanford, v. Grocery Go.,*143 N. C., 419. *Lockhart v. Bear,*117 N. C., 298, where a demurrer to the complaint was filed, is distinguished.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Clement, J.,*at February Term, 1931, of EOCKINGULAM.

On 24 October, 1927, Howard Martin purchased an automobile from the Eeidsville Motor Company, falsely representing that he was of age. *Morris Plan Co. v. Palmer,*185 N. 0., 109, 116 S. E., 261; *Sight v. Sarris,*188 N. C., 328, 124 S. E., 623. Later, after the automobile had been stolen or disposed of, he brought an action to rescind the contract and to recover back the purchase money paid. *McCormick v. Crotts,*198 N. O., 664, 153 S. E., 152; *Collins v. Norfleet-Baggs,*197 N. C., 659, 150 S. E., 177. Thereafter, the said Howard Martin was indicted *642and tried on a charge of obtaining said automobile under false pretense. 14 R. C. L., 265. The court nonsuited the case on the ground that the defendant was a minor. He was not under sixteen years of age at the time of the purchase of the automobile, so as to come within the Juvenile Court Act. *8. v. Burnett,*179 N. C., 735, 102 S. E., 711; *S. v. Ooble,*181 N. 0., 554, 107 S. E., 132. “He looked to be 21, if not more. He said he was going on 22.”

This action was then instituted for malicious abuse of process, alleged to have arisen out of said criminal prosecution.

From a judgment of nonsuit, the plaintiff appeals.

*Sharp & Sharp, Hunter K. Penn and Glidewell, Dunn & Gwyn for plaintiff.*

*Brown & Trotter for defendant.*

Per Curiam.

Conceding, without deciding, that the criminal action against the plaintiff was instituted for retaliatory purposes only, nevertheless there is no evidence of any act done therein contrary to the orderly and regular prosecution of the case. *Stanford v. Grocery Co.,*143 N. C., 419, 55 S. E., 815.

The case of *Lockhart v. Bear,*117 N. C., 298, 23 S. E., 484, cited and relied upon by the plaintiff, was decided upon a demurrer to the complaint, rather than on a demurrer to the evidence, and is quite different in the facts alleged.

Affirmed.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2319

Primex Family of Companies:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 49 (Tuesday, March 14, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 13729]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6188]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Meeting: Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Interagency Coordinating Committee; 
Public Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of the public meeting of the Chronic Fatigue 
Syndrome (CFS) Interagency Coordinating Committee, Department of Health 
and Human Services, on April 12, 1995 at the Hubert H. Humphrey 
Building, Room 729G, 200 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC.
    The meeting will be open to the public from noon to 3 p.m., on 
April 12, to discuss the current CFS activities and future plans of the 
various member agencies. It will be chaired by the Assistant Secretary 
for Health. During the meeting there will be an opportunity for 
interested persons to present information and views on issues related 
to CFS. Attendance by the public will be limited only by space 
available.
    If you plan to attend the meeting, please provide your name, 
organization, address, telephone and FAX numbers to Dr. John La 
Montagne, Co-Chair, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Interagency Coordinating 
Committee, Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, National 
Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of 
Health, Solar Building, Room 3A18 MSC 7630, Bethesda, MD 20892-7630. 
Telephone: 301-496-1884, FAX: 301-480-4528. If you also plan to make a 
presentation, please notify Dr. La Montagne. The time available will be 
allocated among the individuals who request an opportunity for a 
presentation (limited to five minutes). Formal written statements (five 
copies) may be presented to the Chair on the day of the meeting for 
inclusion in the minutes.

    Dated: March 2, 1995.
Anthony S. Fauci,
Director, NIAID, NIH.
[FR Doc. 95-6188 Filed 3-13-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 47 (Friday, March 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 13120]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6012]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
(A-570-839)


Notice of Postponement of Preliminary Antidumping Duty 
Determination: Certain Partial-Extension Steel Drawer Slides With 
Rollers From the People's Republic of China

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 10, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Brinkmann (202-482-5288) or 
Michelle Frederick (202-482-0186), Office of Antidumping 
Investigations, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230.

POSTPONEMENT OF PRELIMINARY DETERMINATION: On November 21, 1994, the 
Department of Commerce (``the Department'') initiated an antidumping 
duty investigation of certain partial-extension steel drawer slides 
with rollers (``drawer slides'') from the People's Republic of China 
(PRC) (59 FR 60773, November 28, 1994). The notice of initiation stated 
that if this investigation proceeds normally, the Department would 
issue its preliminary determination on or before April 9, 1995.
    On December 15, 1994, the U.S. International Trade Commission 
determined that there is a reasonable indication that a U.S. domestic 
industry is threatened with material injury by reason of imports of 
drawer slides from the PRC (59 FR 65787, December 21, 1994).
    This investigation is rendered extraordinarily complicated by the 
novel issue of government ownership of exporters of subject 
merchandise. Furthermore, information available to the Department 
indicates that there are many producers/exporters of the subject 
merchandise. The process of identifying all exporters who sold subject 
merchandise to the United States during the POI caused significant 
delays in issuing our questionnaire. In addition, we determine at this 
time that respondent parties in this investigation appear to be 
cooperating.
    For these reasons, pursuant to sections 733(c)(1)(B)(i) (II) and 
(III) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), we determine 
that this investigation is extraordinarily complicated and that 
additional time is necessary to make the preliminary determination in 
accordance with 733(c)(1)(B)(ii) of the Act. Therefore, we are 
postponing our preliminary determination in this investigation until no 
later than May 30, 1995.
    This notice is published pursuant to section 733(c)(2) of the Act 
of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 353.15(d).

    Dated: March 3, 1995.
Barbara R. Stafford,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Investigations, Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 95-6012 Filed 3-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2052

Braeburn Systems LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BlackRock, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Laurence D. Fink, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Paul L. Audet, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                 |  | 
|-------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Laurence D. Fink            
|Name: Laurence D. Fink          
|Title:   Chief Executive Officer
|Date:   November 5, 2004        
|                                
|/s/ Paul L. Audet               
|Name: Paul L. Audet             
|Title:   Chief Financial Officer
|Date:   November 5, 2004
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2718

Banner Engineering Corp:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 30 (Tuesday, February 16, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7891-7892]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-03041]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Foreign Assets Control


Sanctions Actions Pursuant to Executive Order 13224

AGENCY: Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control 
(OFAC) is publishing the name of 1 individual whose property and 
interests in property are blocked pursuant to Executive Order 13224 of 
September 23, 2001, ``Blocking Property and Prohibiting Transactions 
With Persons Who Commit, Threaten To Commit, or Support Terrorism.''

DATES: OFAC's action described in this notice is effective on February 
10, 2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Associate Director for Global 
Targeting, tel.: 202/622-2420, Assistant Director for Sanctions 
Compliance & Evaluation, tel.: 202/622-2490, Assistant Director for 
Licensing, tel.: 202/622-2480, Office of Foreign Assets Control, or 
Chief

[[Page 7892]]

Counsel (Foreign Assets Control), tel.: 202/622-2410, Office of the 
General Counsel, Department of the Treasury (not toll free numbers).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Electronic and Facsimile Availability

    The SDN List and additional information concerning OFAC sanctions 
programs are available from OFAC's Web site (www.treas.gov/ofac). 
Certain general information pertaining to OFAC's sanctions programs is 
also available via facsimile through a 24-hour fax-on-demand service, 
tel.: 202/622-0077.

Notice of OFAC Actions

    On February 10, 2016, OFAC blocked the property and interests in 
property of the following 1 individual pursuant to E.O. 13224, 
``Blocking Property and Prohibiting Transactions With Persons Who 
Commit, Threaten To Commit, or Support Terrorism'':

Individual

    1. AL-HABABI, Nayf Salam Muhammad Ujaym (a.k.a. AL-HABABI, Nayef 
Salam Muhammad Ujaym; a.k.a. AL-QAHTANI AL-QATARI, Farouq; a.k.a. 
AL-QAHTANI, Faruq; a.k.a. AL-QAHTANI, Sheikh Farooq; a.k.a. AL-
QATARI, Faruq; a.k.a. AL-QATARI, Sheikh Farooq; a.k.a. FAROUK, 
Shaykh Imran), Afghanistan; DOB 01 Jan 1979 to 31 Dec 1981; POB 
Saudi Arabia; nationality Qatar; alt. nationality Saudi Arabia; 
Passport 592667 (Qatar) issued 03 May 2007; Sheikh (individual) 
[SDGT] (Linked To: AL QA'IDA).


    Dated: February 10, 2016.
John E. Smith,
Acting Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control.
[FR Doc. 2016-03041 Filed 2-12-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3689 

To ensure that, after the declaration of a major disaster, States, local governments, and Indian tribal governments affected by the major disaster 

receive immediate approval for services and assistance under section 

416 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance 

Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 17, 2022 

Mr. WARNOCK (for himself, Ms. STABENOW, and Mr. PADILLA) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To ensure that, after the declaration of a major disaster, 

States, local governments, and Indian tribal governments 

affected by the major disaster receive immediate approval 

for services and assistance under section 416 of the 

Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Crisis Counseling Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3689 IS

1 SEC. 2. CRISIS COUNSELING ASSISTANCE AND TRAINING. 

2 Section 416 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief 

3 and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5183) is 

4 amended— 

5 (1) by striking ‘‘The President is authorized’’ 

6 and inserting the following: 

7 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The President is authorized’’; 

8 and 

9 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

10 ‘‘(b) IMMEDIATE ASSISTANCE REQUIRED.— 

11 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—A State or local agency, or 

12 an Indian tribal government, that is affected by a 

13 major disaster may submit to the President a re14 quest for the financial assistance described in sub15 section (a). 

16 ‘‘(2) IMMEDIATE APPROVAL.—Immediately 

17 upon receipt of a request for financial assistance 

18 under paragraph (1), the President shall— 

19 ‘‘(A) approve the request; and 

20 ‘‘(B) grant the financial assistance.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2752

Faurecia US Holdings:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-2859

EQI, Ltd: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel