14052 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 50 / Wednesday, March 15, 1995 / Notices

document) will require the use of at

least a 486DX2–66 machine or

Macintosh equivalent.

Not only should this effort result in a

much more efficient use of space,

personnel, equipment, and expertise,

but it should save the public and the

government time and money in

analyzing information submitted to the

docket.

Notice of Public Meeting

The Department believes that users

will benefit from an opportunity to hear

a more detailed description of the new

docket management system and to ask

questions about it. Therefore, we are

holding a public meeting beginning at

1:30 PM and ending no later than 4:00

PM (local time) on March 29, 1995, in

Washington, DC. We hope that as

people start using the system, they will

point out problems and bring us new

ideas on how to make the system more

responsive to their needs.

Seating will be restricted by available

room size and will be made available on

a first-come-first-served basis. If time

and the number of attendees permit, we

may be able to conduct one or more

short tours of the new docket facility. If

the interest expressed in the tour

exceeds the capacity of our docket

facility, we will schedule additional

tours. Persons interested in attending

should contact Rasheed Tahir at 202–

366–9307.

Since this meeting is intended to

inform the public about and to solicit

public views and questions on the new

docket management system, we will

conduct it in an informal manner.

Issued in Washington, D. C. on March 13,

1995.

Stephen H. Kaplan,

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 95–6512 Filed 3–14–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–62–P

Federal Aviation Administration

[Summary Notice No. PE–9521]

Petitions for Exemption; Summary of

Petitions Received; Dispositions of

Petitions Issued

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of petitions for

exemption received and of dispositions

of prior petitions.

SUMMARY: Pursuant to FAA’s rulemaking

provisions governing the application,

processing, and disposition of petitions

for exemption (14 CFR Part 11), this

notice contains a summary of certain

petitions seeking relief from specified

requirements of the Federal Aviation

Regulations (14 CFR Chapter I),

dispositions of certain petitions

previously received, and corrections.

The purpose of this notice is to improve

the public’s awareness of, and

participation in, this aspect of FAA’s

regulatory activities. Neither publication

of this notice nor the inclusion or

omission of information in the summary

is intended to affect the legal status of

any petition or its final disposition.

DATES: Comments on petitions received

must identify the petition docket

number involved and must be received

on or before April 4, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on any

petition in triplicate to: Federal

Aviation Administration, Office of the

Chief Counsel, Attn: Rule Docket (AGC–

200), Petition Docket No. lllll,

800 Independence Avenue, SW.,

Washington, DC 20591.

The petition, any comments received,

and a copy of any final disposition are

filed in the assigned regulatory docket

and are available for examination in the

Rules Docket (AGC–200), Room 915G,

FAA Headquarters Building (FOB 10A),

800 Independence Avenue SW.,

Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202)

267–3132.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.

D. Michael Smith, Office of Rulemaking

(ARM–1), Federal Aviation

Administration, 800 Indpendence

Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591;

telephone (202) 267–7470.

This notice is published pursuant to

paragraphs (c), (e), and (g) of § 11.27 of

Part 11 of the Federal Aviation

Regulations (14 CFR Part 11).

Issued in Washington, DC, on March 9,

1995.

Donald P. Byrne,

Assistant Chief Counsel for Regulations.

Petitions for Exemption

Docket No.: 27956

Petitioner: Air Line Pilots Association

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

appendices I and J, part 121

Corrective Action: To withdraw the

notice of this petition published in

the Federal Register on February 17,

1995. Due to an inadvertent

administrative error, on January 31,

1995, the FAA responded to already

denied petitions and published this

response for comments.

Dispositions of Petitions

Docket No.: 24052

Petitioner: The Blue Angels

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

91.117(a) and (b), 91.119(c), and

91.303(c) and (d)

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To extend Exemption No.

4504, as amended, which permits the

Blue Angels pilots to conduct airshow

rehearsals involving low-level, highspeed, and aerobatic flight subject to

certain conditions and limitations.

GRANT, February 23, 1995,

Exemption No. 4504D

Docket No.: 25390

Petitioner: Airbus Industrie

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

145.35

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit the production

units and associated partners of

Airbus to be collectively certificated

under Airbus as a U.S. foreign repair

station to support the operation of

U.S.-registered A300, A310, A320,

A321, A330, and A340 aircraft.

GRANT, February 15, 1995,

Exemption No. 6029

Docket No.: 26976

Petitioner: United States Coast Guard

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

91.119(c)

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To extend Exemption No.

5614, which permits the Coast Guard

to operate over other than congested

areas at an altitude of less than 500

feet and, in the case of operations over

open water or sparsely populated

areas, at a distance closer than 500

feet to any person, vessel, vehicle, or

structure for the purpose of rescuing

and aiding persons and protecting and

saving property. GRANT, February 23,

1995, Exemption No. 5614A

Docket No.: 27086

Petitioner: Bombardier, Inc.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

61.55(b)(2); 61.56(c)(1); 61.57(c) and

(d); 61.58(c)(1) and (d); 61.63(c)(2)

and (d)(2) and (3); 61.65(c), (e)(2) and

(3), and (g); 61.67(d)(2); 61.157(d)(1)

and (2) and (e)(1) and (2); 61.191(c);

and appendix A, part 61

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To extend Exemption No.

5617, which permits Bombardier to

use FAA-approved simulators to meet

certain flight experience requirements

of part 61 of the FAR. GRANT,

February 16, 1995, Exemption No.

5617A

Docket No.: 27951

Petitioner: Corning Incorporated

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

25.562(b) and (c)

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To allow Corning

Incorporated exemption from

performing the emergency landing

dynamic tests required by

§§ 25.562(b) and (c), for seating on

Corning’s Dornier 328–100 aircraft.
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 50 / Wednesday, March 15, 1995 / Notices 14053

DENIAL, February 16, 1995,

Exemption No. 6028

Docket No.: 28077

Petitioner: Evan Joseph Farrow (through

his mother, Mrs. Pamela Farrow)

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

121.311(b)

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit Evan to be

held on his caregiver’s lap, rather than

being secured in an approved child

restraint device or in an individual

seat with a seatbelt, while aboard an

aircraft even though he has reached

his second birthday. GRANT,

February 14, 1995, Exemption No.

6027

Docket No.: 28099

Petitioner: Delta Air Lines, Inc.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

25.791(a) and 121.317(a)

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To allow Delta to operate

MD–90 aircraft with the ‘‘No

Smoking’’ signs hardwired in the ON

position. GRANT, March 1, 1995,

Exemption No. 6034

[FR Doc. 95–6401 Filed 3–14–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

National Highway Traffic Safety

Administration

[Docket No. 95–17; Notice 1]

Notice of Receipt of Petition for

Decision That Nonconforming 1985

Dobson Horse Trailers Are Eligible for

Importation

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic

Safety Administration, DOT

ACTION: Notice of receipt of petition for

decision that nonconforming 1985

Dobson horse trailers are eligible for

importation.

SUMMARY: This notice announces receipt

by the National Highway Traffic Safety

Administration (NHTSA) of a petition

for a decision that a 1985 Dobson horse

trailer that was not originally

manufactured to comply with all

applicable Federal motor vehicle safety

standards is eligible for importation into

the United States because it has safety

features that comply with, or are

capable of being altered to comply with,

all such standards.

DATE: The closing date for comments on

the petition is April 14, 1995.

ADDRESS: Comments should refer to the

docket number and notice number, and

be submitted to: Docket Section, Room

5109, National Highway Traffic Safety

Administration, 400 Seventh Street SW.,

Washington, DC 20590. (Docket hours

are from 9:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.)

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ted Bayler, Office of Vehicle Safety

Compliance, NHTSA (202–366–5306).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

Under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A)

(formerly section 108(c)(3)(A)(i)(I) of the

National Traffic and Motor Vehicle

Safety Act (the Act)), a motor vehicle

that was not originally manufactured to

conform to all applicable Federal motor

vehicle safety standards shall be refused

admission into the United States unless

NHTSA has decided that the motor

vehicle is substantially similar to a

motor vehicle originally manufactured

for importation into and sale in the

United States, certified under 49 U.S.C.

30115 (formerly section 114 of the Act),

and of the same model year as the

model of the motor vehicle to be

compared, and is capable of being

readily altered to conform to all

applicable Federal motor vehicle safety

standards. Where there is no

substantially similar U.S.-certified

motor vehicle, 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(B)

(formerly section 108(c)(3)(A)(i)(II) of

the Act, 15 U.S.C. 1397(c)(3)(A)(i)(II))

permits a nonconforming motor vehicle

to be admitted into the United States if

its safety features comply with, or are

capable or being altered to comply with,

all applicable Federal motor vehicle

safety standards based on destructive

test data of such other evidence as

NHTSA decides to be adequate.

Petitions for eligibility decisions may

be submitted by either manufacturers or

importers who have registered with

NHTSA pursuant to 49 CFR part 592. As

specified in 49 CFR 593.7, NHTSA

publishes notice in the Federal Register

of each petition that it receives, and

affords interested an opportunity to

comment on the petition. At the cost of

the period, NHTSA decides, on the basis

of the petition and any comments that

it has received, whether the vehicle is

eligible for importation. The agency

then publishes this decision in the

Federal Register.

G&K Automotive Conversion, Inc. of

Santa Ana, California (Registered

Importer R–90–007) has petitioned

NHTSA to decide whether 1985 Dobson

horse trailers are eligible for importation

into the United States. The petitioner

contends that this vehicle is eligible for

importation under 49 U.S.C.

30141(a)(1)(B) because it has safety

features that comply with, or are

capable of being altered to comply with,

all applicable Federal motor vehicle

safety standards.

Specifically, the petitioner claims that

the 1985 Dobson horse trailer complies

with Standard No. 119 New Pneumatic

Tires for Vehicles other than Passenger

Cars. Additionally, the petitioner claims

that the vehicle complies with Standard

No. 121 Air Brake Systems in that it

‘‘has drum style brakes at each wheel

set, of a size and capacity sufficient to

meet the standard.’’

The petitioner further contends that

the vehicle is capable of being readily

altered to the meet the following

standards, in the manner indicated:

Standard No. 106 Brake Hoses:

Replacement of all existing brake hose

linings from the front connection to the

pressure modulators and from the

pressure modulators to the wheel brake

assemblies with hose lining that bear

DOT markings and have crimped end

fittings.

Standard No. 108 Lamps, Reflective

Devices, and Associated Equipment: (a)

installation of two yellow illuminated

markers on each side of the vehicle and

on its from end; (b) installation of one

yellow reflector on each side of the

vehicle; (c) installation of one red

illuminated marker on each side of the

vehicle and five red illuminated

markers on its rear end; (d) installation

of one red reflector marker on each side

of the vehicle and two red reflector

markers on its rear end; (e) installation

of one strip of 50mm (Grade DOT–C2)

white/red retroreflective sheeting on

each side of the vehicle and on its rear

end; (f) installation of two strips of

50mm (Grade DOT–C2) white

retroreflective sheeting on the vehicle’s

rear end; (g) installation of one white

license plate lamp on the vehicle’s rear

and: (h) installation of two red taillamp/

stoplamp/turn indicators on the

vehicle’s rear end.

Standard No. 115 Vehicle

Identification Number: Installation of a

VIN plate.

Standard No. 120 Tire Selection and

Rims for Motor Vehicles other than

Passenger Cars: Installation of a tire

information placard.

Interested person are invited to

submit comments on the petition

described above. Comments should refer

to the docket number and be submitted

to: Docket Section, National Highway

Traffic Safety Administration, Room

5109, 400 Seventh Street SW.,

Washington, DC 20590. It is requested

but not required that 10 copies be

submitted.

All comments received before the

close of business on the closing date

indicated above will be considered, and

will be available for examination in the

docket at the above address both before

and after that date. To the extent

possible, comments filed after the

closing date will also be considered.