alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATIONS

I, Oliver G. Brewer, certify that:
1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Adams Golf, Inc.;
2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4.      The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and
have:
       a)    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
       b)    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of
the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and 
       c)    disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting; and
5.      The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
       a)    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
       b)    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

|Date:  August 8, 2006 |  | By:/S/ OLIVER G. BREWER III          
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|                      |  | Oliver G. Brewer, III                
|                      |  | Chief Executive Officer and President
The EcoTech Marine, LLC Section 301 exclusion filing 

VorTech MP60

8501312000 brushless DC motor between 37.5w and 74.6w

Description.

Part Number 10302

Voltage: 32 VDC
Exhibit 99.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Salisbury Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John F.
Foley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

/s/  John F. Foley
     -----------------------
     John F. Foley
     Chief Financial Officer

May 12, 2003


                                       24
SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

MITCHELL RUBINSON; AND ROMAN JONES, Appellants, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION, Respondent.


### ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE No. 66317 

# FILED
FEB 2 6 2016

TRACE K. LINDEMAN CLERK QF SuPREME COURT BY DEPUTY CLERK This is an appeal from a district court order denying a petition for judicial review in a tax matter. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Jessie Elizabeth Walsh, Judge.

An administrative law judge found appellants Mitchell Rubinson and Roman Jones to be responsible persons under NRS 360.297 who willfully failed to pay for Prive Las Vegas, LLC's unpaid taxes. Rubinson and Jones appealed to the Nevada Tax Commission, which affirmed the administrative law judge's decision.

Rubinson and Jones subsequently filed a petition for judicial review with the district court. Respondent State of Nevada, Department of Taxation (Department), filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that the district court lacked jurisdiction to consider the petition because Rubinson and Jones had failed to comply with the requirements of NRS 360.395. The district court granted the Department's motion. Rubinson and Jones raise the following issues on appeal: (1) whether the district court erred in requiring Rubinson and Jones to comply with NRS 360.395 as a condition for appealing the final administrative determination of the Nevada Tax Commission to the district court; and (2) whether the repayment requirement prior to• litigating, pursuant to NRS 360.395, violates

(0) I947ARubinson's and Jones's right to due process and equal protection under the

United States and Nevada Constitutions. Rubinson and Jones have conceded that they are subject to the requirements of NRS 360.395

At the hearing regarding respondent's motion to dismiss, on July 8, 2014, counsel for Rubinson and Jones conceded that his clients did not have a right to move forward with a petition for judicial review because they had not paid the taxes owed or entered into an agreement with the Department. He further stated that 143 what I would invite the Court to do is to grant the motion to dismiss and to disallow the petition for judicial review."

Rubinson and Jones have made no effort to meet the requirements of the statute. Accordingly, it appears that this concession is dispositive of the issues on appeal.

Therefore, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.'



### Hal 

# e i raCtiC J. Saitta o
J. Pickering

'As the constitutional issues raised on appeal by Rubinson and Jones were not raised below and were not considered by the district court, we need not address them. Munoz v. State ex rel. Dep't of Highways, 92 Nev. 441, 444, 552 P.2d 42, 43-44 (1976).

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2

(0) 1947A encc: Hon. Jessie Elizabeth Walsh, District Judge Salvatore C. Gugino, Settlement Judge Jason G. Landess, Ltd. Attorney General/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 3

(0) I94Th 41:13*
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

EX PARTE: ADAM PORRAS

,

Appellant. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 22

- 00 115

- C R

Appeal from the

1 06 th District Court

of Gaines C ounty, Texas

(TC# 22

- 5803 )

O R D E R

The reporter’s record was filed on July 13 , 2022 . Pursuant to Tex.R.App.P. 31.1, the Court

sets the following brief schedule: Appellant’s brief shall be due in this Court on or before August

12 , 2022 and the State ’s brief shall be due no later than thirty days after the Appellant’s brief is

filed with this Court. A submission date will be determined at a later date and the parties will be

p rovided with advanced notice of the setting. See Tex.R.App.P. 39.8.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 1 3 th day of July , 20 22

.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez , C.J., Palafox and Alley , JJ.
Exhibit 4.50





Exhibit 4.50




Agreement






This AGREEMENT is entered into on the day of October 12, 2010 at Shanghai by and between
the following parties:




Party
A: GIGAMEDIA (HK) LIMITED



Address



Party
B: Song
Yunv (Chinese name  )




Nationality: Chinese





ID Number: 310228198107295846


310228198107295846



WHEREAS, Party A is a company registered in Hong Kong Special Administration Region. Party A
wishes to incorporate a company with tentative company name as “Shanghai Ji Di Technology Co., Ltd”
and Chinese name  or any other similar names approved by company
registration office (“Company”) in PRC Shanghai Zhabei District, Party B may provide the above
service and act as one of the shareholders to incorporate the Company. Party A hereby agrees to pay
Party B a certain amount in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth herein.








NOW, THEREFORE, through mutual negotiations, both parties agree as follows:



Article 1 The parties agree to enter into this Agreement in a spirit of good will and cooperation
for the benefit of all parties. Party A agrees to provide all necessary assistance to Party B in
connection to the incorporation of the Company. Party A agrees to provide a payment to Party B in
amount of RMB 2,000,000 (in capital RMB two millions only) in accordance with the terms and
conditions set forth in this Agreement. Both parties agree any gains from the shares or the Company
shall belong to Party A.


 


 









 









Article 2 Party B agrees to accept such payment provided by Party A. Party B hereby agrees and
warrants that she/he will use such amount only for the investment in, together with other relevant
parties, the Company. Without the prior written consent of Party A, Party B will not use such
amount for the investment in any other domain and will not transfer or pledge the shares in the
Company to any third party. Party B further agrees that she/he will pledge the shares in the
Company to Party A to secure the payment at the request of Party A.





Article 3 If there are any questions or uncertainty about this Agreement, we will discuss it with
an arbitrator in Hong Kong and he will resolve it based on Hong Kong law.





Article 4 Assignment





Party B may not transfer any rights and duties under this Agreement to any other third party.







 


2









 







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed on their
behalf by the duly authorized representative as of the date first written above.





	 	 	 
	Party A: GIGAMEDIA (HK) LIMITED
	 	Party B: Song Yunv
	 
	 	






Representative:


 


3









 





Appendix I





Confirmation of Draw down





I hereby confirm that I have received on date of November 18, 2010, RMB2,000,000 from GIGAMEDIA
(HK) LIMITED.







       
               
                
               
        ( _______ )




Song Yunv (Chinese name 
)





 


4
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the quarterly report of EBS Building, LLC (the Company) on Form 10-QSB
for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission)
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Keith F. Cooper, Senior Managing Director of the Manager of the
Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) |  | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) |  | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Commission or its staff upon request.

| | /s/ Keith F. Cooper                                                                      
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Keith F. Cooper, Senior Managing Director
FTI Consulting, as Manager EBS Building, L.L.C.

| | November 14, 2003
| | -----------------
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 50 (Wednesday, March 15, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 13976]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6304]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. FA90-68-003]


Williams Natural Gas Company; Filing

March 9, 1995.
    Take notice that Williams Natural Gas Company (WNG) on November 23, 
1995, tendered for filing a report of refunds made to jurisdictional 
customers.
    WNG states that Commission order issued October 14, 1994 required 
WNG to refund the principal amount of $1,088,254 at issue in this 
proceeding, with interest from the time customers first paid these 
carrying charges to the date of the refund. On November 14, 1994, WNG 
refunded $1,503,020, which included interest from July 1, 1990 through 
November 14, 1994, to the customers who paid such carrying charges.
    WNG states that a copy of its filing was served on all 
jurisdictional customers receiving a refund, all participants listed on 
the service lists maintained by the Commission in the docket referenced 
above, and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 
20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules 
of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before March 23, 1995. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-6304 Filed 3-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-10482

Modine Manufacturing:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
**E** **xhibit
10.16**
 **Generex
Biotechnology Corporation**
 33
Harbour Square, Suite 202
 Toronto,
Ontario
 Canada
M5J 2G2
 
 
 
 
 
 March 31,
2005
 
 **Dr.
Gerald Bernstein, M.D.**
 48
Carleon Avenue
 Larchmont,
New York
 USA
10538
 
 
 Dear Dr.
Bernstein:
 
 **Re:**  **Employment
Agreement Amendment**
 
 We make
reference to the employment agreement (the “ Agreement ”) made
as of the 1 st day of
April, 2002 by and between you and Generex Biotechnology Corporation. The
purpose of this letter is to confirm our mutual agreement to amend the Agreement
as follows:
  1.
    Section
      1.2 of the Agreement is hereby deleted and replaced with the following:
      “The term of this Agreement shall commence on the date hereof and expire
      on March 31, 2008, subject to earlier termination in accordance with the
      provisions of Section 5 of this Agreement.”
  2.
    Section
      3.1 of the Agreement is hereby deleted and replaced with the following:
      “From April 1, 2005 until the termination of this Agreement the Company
      will pay to the Executive a base salary of $200,000*per
      annum*,
      which salary will be payable in equal monthly instalments (less customary
      withholdings) in arrears.”
  3.
    The
      provision in Exhibit A to the Agreement for the payment to the Executive
      of advances against potential cash bonuses in the sum of $2,500 per month
      is hereby deleted from the Agreement in its
entirety.
  In all
other respects, the Agreement will remain in full force and effect,
unamended.
  
 Kindly
confirm that you are in agreement with the foregoing amendments by signing the
enclosed duplicate copy of this letter where indicated below and returning it to
the attention of the undersigned.
  **Generex
      Biotechnology Corporation**/s/ Rose C. PerriName:Rose
      C. PerriTitle:Chief
      Operating Officer
 
 **AGREED
AS OF THE 31** **ST** **DAY OF MARCH, 2005.**
 
 
 /s/
      Gerald BernsteinWitness
    
    **DR. GERALD
    BERNSTEIN**
 
 
 2
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

May 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
133297 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 133297 COA: 263946 Wayne CC: 04-009785-01 EARL RODGERS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 30, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

C AVANAGH , J., would grant leave to appeal to consider the videotaping issue.

K ELLY , J., would grant leave to appeal.

l0521 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 30, 2007

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM TRANSPORTATION COMPONENTS, INC. 6/30/98 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           5,567
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,709
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     56,823
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                94,335
<PP&E>                                           9,262
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 156,717
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,509
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           165
<OTHER-SE>                                      90,218
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   156,717
<SALES>                                          3,786
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,786
<CGS>                                            2,664
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,877
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    12
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  29
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4,796)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        30
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (4,826)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (4,826)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 43 (Monday, March 6, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 12275]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5429]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION


Aviation Proceedings; Agreements Filed During the Week Ended 
February 24, 1995

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under the provisions of 49 U.S.C 412 and 414. Answers 
may be filed within 21 days of date of filing.

Docket Number: 50148.
    Date filed: February 21, 1995.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: COMP Telex Mail Vote 729.
    Proposed Effective Date: April 1, 1995.

Docket Number: 50149.
    Date filed: February 21, 1995.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: TC23 Reso/P 0686 dated January 27, 1995, Europe-Southeast 
Asia Resos r-1 to r-23.
    Proposed Effective Date: April 1, 1995.

Docket Number: 50150.
    Date filed: February 21, 1995.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: TC12 Telex Mail Vote 730, Germany-Canada Fares, r-1--076jj 
r-2--080rr.
    Proposed Effective Date: April 1, 1995.
Myrna F. Adams,
Acting Chief, Documentary Services Division.
[FR Doc. 95-5429 Filed 3-3-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P