alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
10.14**
 **OPTION
AGREEMENT**
 
 
 This
Option Agreement evidences the grant of a stock option (the "Option") to
purchase shares of common stock, par value $.001 (the "Company Stock"), of
Generex Biotechnology Corporation (the "Company") granted to **Rose
Perri** (the
"Optionee") pursuant to the Generex Biotechnology Corporation 2001 Stock Option
Plan (the “Plan”), a copy of which is attached to this Option Agreement and
incorporated into this Option Agreement by reference. The Option is subject to
the terms, conditions, limitations and restrictions set forth in the Plan,
including the following:
 
 a.  The date
of grant of the Option is **April
5, 2005** and the
number of shares of Company Stock that may be purchased upon exercise of the
Option is **576,752
(Five Hundred Seventy Six Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty Two
)** .
 
 b.  The
purchase price (the “Exercise Price”) of Company Stock subject to the Option is
 **$0.001** per
share.
 
 c.  The
Option is fully vested upon issuance.
 
 d.  Unless
sooner terminated pursuant to the Plan, the Option shall terminate on **April
4, 2010.** Option
will survive the termination of the Optionee’s employment.
 
 e.  The
Optionee shall pay the Exercise Price for the Option (i) in cash or (ii) by such
other method as may be approved by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s
Board of Directors. The Optionee shall pay the amount of any withholding tax due
at the time of exercise, as provided in the Plan.
 
 f.  The
rights and interests of the Optionee under this Option Agreement may not be
sold, assigned, encumbered or otherwise transferred, except, in the event of the
death of the Optionee, by will or by the laws of descent and
distribution.
 
 g.  Any
notice to the Company, including notice of exercise of an Option, shall be
addressed to the Company in care of Slava Jarnitskii at the Company’s principal
offices.
 
 IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, this Option Agreement has been executed on behalf of the
Company by a duly authorized officer and by the Optionee effective as of the
date of grant of the Option.


GENEREX BIOTECHNOLOGY
      CORPORATION
    
    
    ACCEPTED AND AGREED:By:
    /s/ Rose C. Perri
    
    
    /s/
      Rose PerriROSE C. PERRI
    
    
    Rose Perri
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 7 (Wednesday, January 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 2746]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-622]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-118-000]


Columbia Gas Transmission Corp.; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

January 5, 1995.
    Take notice that on December 30, 1994, Columbia Gas Transmission 
Corporation (Columbia), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, to be 
effective February 1, 1995.

Third Revised Sheet No. 31
First Revised Sheet No. 31A
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 262
Second Revised Sheet No. 480

    Columbia states that the instant filing is being tendered to report 
to the Federal Energy Commission, and to all parties in Docket Nos. 
RP94-1-005, et al., and RP93-161-005, the actual WACOG Surcharge 
collections for the surcharge period September 1, 1993 through October 
31, 1994, and to cancel the rate and provisions pursuant to Section 45 
Unrecovered WACOG Surcharge of the General Terms and Conditions of 
Columbia's FERC Gas Tariff.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street NE., Washington, D.C. 
20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules 
of Practice and Procedure. All such motions or protests should be filed 
on or before January 12, 1995. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person 
wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of 
Columbia's filings are on file with the Commission and are available 
for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-622 Filed 1-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### STANDARD AMUSEMENT COMPANY, INC. (Plaintiff) v. R. O. TARKINGTON and wife, MARY MARSH TARKINGTON (Defendants), and WAYNE THEATRES INC., MAX ZAGER and MAX ZAGER ENTERPRISES (Additional Defendants).

(Filed 16 December, 1959.)

1. Appeal and Error § 34—

Where the evidence is set out in tiie record in question and answer form and not in narrative form as required by Rule 19 (4), Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, .the appeal will be dismissed in the absence of error appearing on the face of the record proper.

Appeal by R. 0. Tarkington and wife, Mary Marsh Tarkington, hereinafter referred to as “defendants,” from *Crissman, J.,*January 19, 1959 term, of Guileoed (Greensboro Division).

This is an action by plaintiff to recover of defendants unpaid rents under a lease of theater properties. Defendants admitted execution of the lease and default in payment of some of the monthly rentals and set up a counterclaim for damages by reason of alleged misrepresentations and fraud inducing defendants to enter into the lease agreement, Defendants admitted that the rent sued for is due and payable. At the close of the evidence the court nonsuited the counterclaim, directed a verdiet on plaintiff’s cause of action and entered judgment accordingly.

From judgment of involuntary nonsuit on the counterclaim defendants appealed and assigned errors.

(7. *C. Hampton, Jr. for plaintiffs, appellees.*

*T. C. Hoyle, Jr. for additional defendants Max Zager and ■Max Zager Enterprises, appellees.*

*Paul It. Ervin for Wayne Theatres, Inc., additional defendant, ap-pellee.*

*Daniel R. Dixon for R. 0. Tarkington and wife, appellants.*

Pee Ctjeiam.

This case was here at the Fall Term, 1957. *Amusement Co. v. Tarkington,*247 N.C. 444, 101 S.E. 2d 398. In the present appeal, plaintiff filed no ’exceptions to defendants’ case on appeal and the case was not settled by the trial jttdge. Plaintiff filed motion in this Court to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the evidence in the case on appeal is not in narrative form. Rule 19 (4), Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 221 N.C. 544, 556. All the testimony in the-case on appeal is in question andi answer form. Rule 19(4) is mandatory and failure to comply therewith necessitates a dismissal of the appeal. *Laughinghouse v. Insurance Co.,*239 N.C. 678, 679, *46280 S.E. 2d 457. When this rule is not complied with this Court will consider only such errors as are presented by the record proper. *Hall v. Hall,*235 N.C. 711, 714, 71 S.E. 2d 471. “For the reasons stated in *Anderson v. Heating Co.,*238 N.C. 138, 76 S.E. 2d 458, the Court has not only found it necessary to adopt Rule 19 (4), but also to enforce it uniformly.” It may not be waived even -by agreement of counsel. *Whiteside v. Purina Co.,*242 N.C. 591, 592, 89 S.E. 2d 159. Notwithstanding this inflexible rule, we have carefully considered the evidence in the record and we find it insufficient to make out a *prima facie*case of fraud as alleged in the counterclaim. No error appears upon the record proper.

The appeal is

Dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       2,192,446
<SECURITIES>                                   108,360
<RECEIVABLES>                                  208,390
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,608,328
<PP&E>                                         407,564
<DEPRECIATION>                                 144,633
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,022,827
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          652,818
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       146,169
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,537,409
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,022,827
<SALES>                                      1,203,096
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,203,096
<CGS>                                        1,043,071
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,043,071
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                178,913
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            178,913
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   178,913
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 50 (Wednesday, March 15, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 13969]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6290]



[[Page 13969]]

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Nevada Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of 
the Nevada Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene on 9:30 
a.m. to 12:00 p.m. on Friday, April 7, 1995, at the Offices of Walther, 
Key, Maupin, et al, 3500 Lakeside Drive, 2nd Floor, Reno, Nevada 89509. 
The purpose of the meeting is to review current civil rights 
developments in the State and plan future program activities.
    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation 
to the Committee, should contact Committee Chairperson Margo Piscevich, 
or Philip Montez, Director of the Western Regional Office, 213-894-3437 
(TDD 213-894-0508). Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the 
meeting and require the services of a sign language interpreter should 
contact the Regional Office at least five (5) working days before the 
scheduled date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, March 3, 1995.
Carol-Lee Hurley,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 95-6290 Filed 3-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the quarterly report of EBS Building, LLC (the Company) on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Keith F. Cooper, Senior
Managing Director of the Manager of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
                    Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Commission or its staff upon request.

| | /s/ Keith F. Cooper                                                                                     
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Keith F. Cooper, Senior Managing Director
 FTI Consulting, as Manager EBS Building, L.L.C. 
May 14, 2004
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3114

CW Bearing USA, Inc:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-11476

Trio Engineered Products:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7395

WADE A. MALONE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

FORD, Mr., Nurse at Facility, Richmond City

Jail; INFIRMARY STAFF, Richmond City Jail,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior

District Judge. (3:06-cv-00500-RLW)

Submitted: January 17, 2008 Decided: January 28, 2008

Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wade A. Malone, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas D. Lane, TILLER LAW

GROUP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee Ford.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Wade A. Malone appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. Malone v. Ford, No.

3:06-cv-00500-RLW (E.D. Va. Aug. 24, 2007). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

REAPPOINTMENTS TO THE CRIMINAL 

PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE

:

:

:

:

:

No. 491

CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL RULES

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 18th day of July, 2017, the Honorable Blaise P. Larotonda, 

Allegheny County, and Michael J. Machen, Esquire, Allegheny County, are hereby

reappointed as members of the Criminal Procedural Rules Committee for a term of 

three years, commencing October 1, 2017.
Exhibit 4


Exhibit 4.1




Great China Mania Holdings, Inc.




INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

AUTHORIZED: 375,000,000 COMMON SHARES, $.01 PAR VALUE




SEE REVERSE FOR

CERTAIN DEFINITIONS




		
	NUMBER:  _____________

	CUSIP: __________







This Certifies That:




Is The Owner Of:




FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES, $.01 PAR VALUE, OF




Great China Mania Holdings, Inc.




transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate is not valid unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar.




In Witness Whereof, the Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed in facsimile by its duly authorized officers and the facsimile seal of the Corporation to be duly affixed hereto.




DATED:  __________________





		
	By: 

	/s/ Yau Wai Hung


	Name:

Title:

	Yau Wai Hung

Chief Executive Officer















1









Great China Mania Holdings, Inc.

Island Stock Transfer

Transfer Fee: As Required

 

The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations:

 

	
	TEN COM as tenants in common

 


	TEN ENT as tenants by the entireties

 


	JT TEN  as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common

 


	UNIF GIFT MIN ACT - Custodian for (Cust.) (Minor) under Uniform Gifts to Minors Act of (State)

 


	Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.







For value received, ____________________________________ hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ (please insert the social security or other identifying number of assignee, the name of assignee, and the address of the assignee) Shares of the Common Stock represented by the within Certificate(s) and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint _________________________________________ Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within-named Corporation, with full power of substitution in the premises.




Dated ________________




		
	SIGNATURE GUARANTEED:

	X __________________________________________________


	  

	 

 

X __________________________________________________







 

THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THIS CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATSOEVER. THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (Banks, Stockbrokers, Savings and Loan Associations and Credit Unions) WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM

  


















2
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2024

Reelcraft Industries:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2331

Reelcraft Industries:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn