alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   45,699
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (1,589)
<INVENTORY>                                     13,607
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                64,552
<PP&E>                                         101,886
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,102
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 246,574
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,085
<BONDS>                                        130,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,467
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             8
<OTHER-SE>                                      36,417
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   246,574
<SALES>                                         56,378
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                56,378
<CGS>                                           41,369
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   51,753
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   287
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   140
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,674
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    238
<INCOME-TAX>                                       178
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 60
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        60
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 42 (Friday, March 3, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 11958]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5290]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED

Procurement List; Proposed Additions

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled.

ACTION: Proposed additions to procurement list.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Committee has received a proposal to add to the 
Procurement List commodities to be furnished by nonprofit agencies 
employing persons who are blind or have other severe disabilities.

COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED ON OR BEFORE: April 3, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled, Crystal Square 3, Suite 403, 1735 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Arlington, Virginia 22202-3461.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Milkman (703) 603-7740.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is published pursuant to 41 
U.S.C. 47(a) (2) and 41 CFR 51-2.3. Its purpose is to provide 
interested persons an opportunity to submit comments on the possible 
impact of the proposed actions.
    If the Committee approves the proposed addition, all entities of 
the Federal government (except as otherwise indicated) will be required 
to procure the commodities listed below from nonprofit agencies 
employing persons who are blind or have other severe disabilities.
    I certify that the following action will not have a significant 
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The major factors 
considered for this certification were:
    1. The action will not result in any additional reporting, 
recordkeeping or other compliance requirements for small entities other 
than the small organizations that will furnish the commodities to the 
Government.
    2. The action does not appear to have a severe economic impact on 
current contractors for the commodities.
    3. The action will result in authorizing small entities to furnish 
the commodities to the Government.
    4. There are no known regulatory alternatives which would 
accomplish the objectives of the Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act (41 U.S.C. 46-
48c) in connection with the commodities proposed for addition to the 
Procurement List.
    Comments on this certification are invited. Commenters should 
identify the statement(s) underlying the certification on which they 
are providing additional information.
    The following commodities have been proposed for addition to 
Procurement List for production by the nonprofit agency listed:

Lancet, Finger Bleeding
    6515-01-225-4757
    6515-01-225-8497
NPA: Lincoln Training Center and Rehabilitation Workshop South El 
Monte, California

Holder, Label, Brass
    9905-02-000-8089
    9905-02-000-8008
    9905-02-000-8698
NPA: Constructive Workshops, Inc. New Britain, Connecticut
Beverly L. Milkman,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 95-5290 Filed 3-2-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-33-P
3XEOLF9HUVLRQRI%&,

3803%5$&.(7&$67,1*35(6685(&217$,1,1*+7&$67,521



3,$==$52%(57

35,&(3803&203$1<

2WKHU

12

3XEOLF9HUVLRQRI%&,
 .*

<(6

12

 

 

,03257,1*7+,63$57)520&+,1$&2676

385&+$6,1*5$:0$7(5,$/$1'0$&+,1,1*,7'20(67,&$//<&267
# ASC Summary

# 8413919010
#### N. F. TURNER v. J. M. TEMPLETON, Jr., and A. J. TEMPLETON.

(Filed 29 March, 1933.)

Bills and Notes H lb—

In an action on a note a demurrer interposed on the ground that defendant was an endorser and the complaint failed to allege that he was given written notice of dishonor is properly overruled where the complaint alleges facts sufficient to show a waiver of notice.

Appeal by defendant, A. J. Templeton, from *Sinclair, J.,*at November Term, 1932, of Ware.

Affirmed.

This is an action on a note payable to the order of the plaintiff, and executed by the defendant, J. M. Templeton, Jr., as maker, and the defendant, A. J. Templeton, as endorser.

From judgment overruling his demurrer to the complaint, the defendant, A. J. Templeton, appealed to the Supreme Court.

*J. Spencer Stell for plaintiff.*

*B. L. McMillan for defendant.*

Per Curiam.

It appears from the complaint that the note sued on was dated 2 April, 1929, and was due ninety days after its date. This action was begun on 16 March, 1931.

*785The demurrer to the complaint on the ground that it is not alleged therein that notice in writing was given to the defendant of the dishonor of the note by its nonpayment at maturity, was properly overruled. Sufficient facts are alleged in the amended complaint to show that there was a waiver of notice by the defendant both express and implied, if upon all the facts alleged in the complaint defendant was liable only as an endorser, and, therefore, entitled to notice. C. S., 3091.

Affirmed.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-1927

DMC Components Intl LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 4 (Friday, January 6, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 2175]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-406]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

Time and Date: 10:00 a.m., Wednesday, January 11, 1995.

Place: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, C Street 
entrance between 20th and 21st Streets, NW., Washington, DC 20551.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered:

    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal 
Reserve System employees.
    2. Any items carried forward from a previously announced 
meeting.

Contact Person for More Information: Mr. Joseph R. Coyne, Assistant to 
the Board; (202) 452-3204. You may call (202) 452-3207, beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before this meeting, for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting.

    Dated: January 4, 1995
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-406 Filed 1-4-95; 11:11 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
EXHIBIT 10.4

 

ENDORSEMENT TO 10% SENIOR SECURED CONVERTIBLE NOTE

 

Precision Optics Corporation, Inc.
 New York, New York
 June 28, 2011

 

The 10% Senior Secured Convertible Note dated June 25, 2008 and amended December 11, 2008, June 25, 2010, July 26, 2010, September 15, 2010, October 15, 2010, November 15, 2010, November 30, 2010, December 1, 2010, December 3, 2010 and December 17, 2010, January 10, 2011, January 24, 2011, February 7, 2011,  February 25, 2011,  March 11, 2011, March 31, 2011, April 15, 2011, April 29, 2011, May 13, 2011, and June 3, 2011 (the “Note”) of Precision Optics Corporation, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”), payable to the order of Arnold Schumsky (the “Holder”) in an aggregate principal amount of $50,000 and to which this Endorsement is affixed is hereby amended in the following respects:

 

1.                                       The term “Stated Maturity Date” is hereby restated to be “July 8, 2011.”

 

2.                                       Except as expressly amended by this Endorsement, the Note remains in full force and effect and the Company hereby reconfirms its obligations thereunder.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Endorsement to be duly executed, and the Holder has caused this Endorsement to be duly accepted, by their respective duly authorized representatives as of the day and year first above written.

 

 

	
 
    	
PRECISION   OPTICS CORPORATION, INC.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By
    	
/s/   Joseph N. Forkey
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Name:   Joseph N. Forkey
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Title:   Chief Executive Officer
    


 

	
Accepted:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/   Arnold Schumsky
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Arnold   Schumsky
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND THE STATEMENT OF EARNINGS FOR THE
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           3,258
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,770
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (376)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,583
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,718
<PP&E>                                          13,433
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,740)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  49,495
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,606
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           124
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,814
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    49,495
<SALES>                                        112,826
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               112,826
<CGS>                                           97,364
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  107,944
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,015)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   376
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 663
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,858
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,548
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,310
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,310
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.27
        


</TABLE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2568

Speck Pumps-Pool Products, Inc: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions.

pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
#### METROPOLITAN REFINING COMPANY v. AVON MILLS COMPANY.

(Filed 28 November, 1928.)

Trial — Issues—Form and Sufficiency.

Issues submitted to tbe jury that give full opportunity to the parties to present every phase of the controversy will not be held for reversible error for refusing other issues tendered, when the court has properly instructed the jury thereunder.

Appeal by defendant from *Townsend, J.,*at Fall Term, 1928, of G-astoN.

No error.

*J. L. Hamme for plaintiff.*

*Mangurn & Denney for defendant.*

Per CuriaM.

Plaintiff brought suit to recover tbe sum of $315 for an alleged sale to tbe defendant of a certain preparation to be used in cleaning, beeping clean, and removing rust from tbe defendant’s boilers. Tbe defendant denied liability and pleaded fraud practiced by tbe plaintiff in securing tbe execution of tbe alleged contract. In answer to tbe issue submitted tbe jury found tbat tbe defendant is indebted to tbe plaintiff in tbe sum of $281.25 with interest from 1 March, 1927. Tbe defendant tendered several issues relating to tbe controversy but, in our opinion, all tbe matters which tbe defendant intended to present could be considered under tbe issue submitted by tbe court and answered by tbe jury; and in such event tbe refusal of tbe court to submit tbe issues tendered is not held for reversible error. *We*have examined tbe instructions given tbe jury, and upon consideration of tbe pleadings and tbe evidence, we find no error which entitles the defendant to a new trial.

No error.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John E. Bourgoin, certify, that to my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MIPS Technologies, Inc. for the three months ended
December 31, 2006 (the Form 10-Q), to which this certificate is an exhibit fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in
the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MIPS Technologies, Inc. for the three month period covered by the Form 10-Q.



|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  |                                                                                
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                    |  |  | 
|Date: June 28, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ JOHN E. BOURGOIN
|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  | John E. Bourgoin President and Chief
Executive Officer, MIPS Technologies, Inc.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided by MIPS Technologies
and will be retained by it and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 Date:  March 13, 2007
    /s/  A. Bradley GabbardA. Bradley GabbardExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent,

v. CHRISTAPHER WHITE, Appellant. No. 73403-2-

UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED: August 1,2016 CO C/1 COf-;-

cr\ ^cr 33- —-K "" _' cr m zn i ^£tTM '-r-. iC/>f*Tf ' pr Ot.o -Hf-, o — Verellen, C.J. — For the first time on appeal, ChristapherWhite argues that as 

### applied to an indigent defendant, imposition ofthe mandatory deoxyribonucleic acid 

### (DNA) fee under RCW 43.43.7541 violates substantive due process.1 In State v. Shelton, we considered and rejected the same argument.2 We held that until the State attempts to enforce collection ofthe DNAfee or impose sanctions for failure to pay, the 

### claim is not ripe for judicial review and is not an error ofconstitutional magnitude subject to review under RAP 2.5(a)(3).3 We also held that "unlikediscretionary legal financial 

### obligations, the legislature unequivocally requires imposition of the mandatory DNA fee

1A jury convicted White ofone count ofassault inthe second degree, two counts ofrape inthe second degree, and one count of unlawful imprisonment. 2No. 72848-2-I, 2016 WL 3461164, at *1 (Wash. Ct. App. June 20, 2016). 3 Id. at *4.No. 73403-2-1/2



### ... at sentencing without regard to finding the ability to pay."4 We adhere to our decision in Shelton. Because the numerous issues listed in the statement of additional grounds do not inform us ofthe "nature and occurrence ofthe alleged errors," we cannot review 

### them.5 Some ofthose issues were already considered and rejected by this court in White's direct appeal.6 Any ofthose issues remaining that involve facts and evidence not in the record on appeal are properly raised through a personal restraint petition, not 

### a statement of additional grounds.7 We affirm thejudgment and sentence.

WE CONCUR: 

# 1 A^/Wyw. V

4|d, at *6. 5State v. Alvarado. 164 Wn.2d 556, 569, 192 P.3d 345 (2008) (citing RAP 10.10(c)). 

### 6State v. White, noted at 184 Wn. App. 1025, at *9-10 & 12 n.15 (2014). 7Alvarado, 164 Wn.2d at 569.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-10444

Excelitas Technologies Corp.:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel