alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A22A0091. RAUL RANGEL ALVAREZ v. THE STATE.

On May 18, 2021, Raul Rangel Alvarez entered a counseled plea to multiple

offenses. On June 4, 2021, Alvarez filed a pro se notice of appeal.

1 We, however, lack

jurisdiction.

“A criminal defendant in Georgia does not have the right to represent himself

and also be represented by an attorney, and pro se filings by represented parties are

therefore unauthorized and without effect.” Tolbert v. Toole, 296 Ga. 357, 363 (3)

(767 SE2d 24) (2014). Here, Alvarez wasrepresented by counsel when he entered his

guilty plea, and nothing in the record indicates that his attorney either withdrew or

was relieved from representing Alvarez. That representation is deemed to continue

for at least 30 days after the entry of Alvarez’s sentence. See Soberanis v. State, 345

Ga. App. 403, 404 (812 SE2d 800) (2018). Accordingly, Alvarez’s pro se notice of

appeal is a nullity, and this appeal is hereby DISMISSED. See id. 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

1 The appeal was transmitted to the Supreme Court, which transferred the

matter to this Court. See Case No. S21A1169 (July 7, 2021).

August 25, 2021

08/25/2021
#### NORTH CAROLINA STATE HIGHWAY AND PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION, Petitioner, v. SARAH JANE BRANN, Widow; COUNTY OF FORSYTH, and CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM, Respondents.

(Filed 11 April, 1956.)

1. Appeal and Error §§ 19, 22—

Sufficiently specific exceptions to the findings of fact which are not entered until after filing of case on appeal, come too late and must be disregarded, and cannot aid broadside exceptions contained in the entries of appeal.

2. Eminent Domain § 17—

Evidence sustaining findings of the court that petitioner voluntarily paid the amount of compensation for land condemned as fixed by the Commissioners, which payment was immediately accepted by the landowner, supports the court’s conclusion that petitioner had waived its exceptions to the order confirming the Commissioners’ report.

Devin, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Appeal by petitioner from *Johnston, J.,*September Term, 1955, Forsyth.

Affirmed.

Special proceeding under G.S. 136-19 to condemn land for public use as a highway right of way.

It is conceded that the proceeding was in all respects regular. The petitioner excepted to the order confirming the report of the commissioners and appealed from an adverse ruling thereon. Thereafter the petitioner delivered to the clerk a voucher in the sum of $14,500 (the appraised value of the land) bearing the notation “In payment of the *759award . . an order for immediate possession; and a letter stating that the motion for immediate possession was made “pursuant to the provisions of G.S. 40-19 . . Upon learning that the clerk had received the voucher, the *feme*defendant “immediately” accepted the same.

When the cause came on for hearing in the court below on the exceptions filed, the judge found the facts, including a finding that the payment made was voluntary, and concluded that such payment constituted a new offer to purchase which had been accepted, thereby constituting a completed agreement of purchase and sale, and petitioner had thereby waived its exceptions. Judgment was entered accordingly and petitioner appealed.

*B. Brookes Peters and McKeithen, Graves & Robinson for petitioner, appellant.*

*Hoyle C. Ripple for respondent, appellee.*

PeR CüRiam.

The exceptions contained in the entries of appeal are broadside in nature and therefore present no question of law for this Court to decide. The exceptions to specific findings of fact and conclusions of law made by the court below were not entered until the petitioner filed its case on appeal. They came too late and must be disregarded. No error appears on the face of the record.

Conceding — but not deciding — that the judge below might have reached a contrary conclusion, we are constrained to hold that the findings of fact and conclusions of law are supported by competent evidence. Hence decision here is controlled by the line of cases represented by *Highway Commission v. Pardington,*242 N.C. 482, 88 S.E. 2d 102. Therefore, the judgment entered is affirmed on authority of the well-reasoned opinion by *Winborne, J.,*in the *Pardington case.*

Affirmed.

Devin, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Dairy Forage Research: Madison, WI
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Madison, Wisconsin U.S. Dairy Forage Research Center Dairy Forage Research Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Research Projects Subjects of Investigation at this LocationEach ARS research project has related subjects of investigation.  Listed below are the subjects of investigation currently conducted at this location.
Clicking on a subject of investigation will list the research projects within that  subject of investigation.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2551

Primex Family of Companies:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2574

Speck Pumps-Pool Products, Inc: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions.

pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          27,633
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,914
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (401)
<INVENTORY>                                     10,346
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               109,745
<PP&E>                                          10,079
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,049)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 119,945
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           70,655
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              228
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      57,296
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   119,945
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               196,914
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  184,264
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,526
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (360)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,439
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,938
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,501
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,501
<EPS-BASIC>                                      $0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.25


</TABLE>
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 7, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 12591]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5700]



                Sunshine Act Meetings



Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 7, 1995 / 
Sunshine Act Meetings
[[Page 12591]] 

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

Time and Date: 11:00 a.m., Monday, March 13, 1995.

Place: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, C Street 
entrance between 20th and 21st Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered:

    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal 
Reserve System employees.
    2. Any items carried forward from a previously announced 
meeting.

Contact Person for More Information: Mr. Joseph R. Coyne, Assistant to 
the Board; (202) 452-3204. You may call (202) 452-3207, beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before this meeting, for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting.

    Dated: March 3, 1995
Jennifer J. Johnson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 95-5700 Filed 3-3-95; 3:43 pm]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
```
SUPPLEMENT NO. 1 TO FIFTH AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF LOAN AGREEMENT AND PROMISSORY NOTE







THIS SUPPLEMENT No. 1 TO FIFTH AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF LOAN AGREEMENT AND PROMISSORY NOTE by and between BLINK COUTURE, INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Maker”) and REGENT PRIVATE CAPITAL, LLC, an Oklahoma limited liability company (the “Payee”) entered into as of April 30, 2011, supplements and amends that certain Fifth Amendment and Restatement of Loan Agreement and Promissory Note dated February 23, 2011 (the “Amendment and Note Restatement”). Capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Amendment and Note Restatement.







For value received, the Maker and Payee hereby agree, effective as of the date hereof, that the following provisions shall supplement and become part of the Amendment and Note Restatement:







1.           Additional Advances.  The Parties hereby agree that during the period from February 1, 2011 through April 30, 2011, the Payee has made additional advances to the Maker, in the aggregate amount of $17,821, in payment of the Maker’s operating expenses during that period, so that effective as of April 30, 2011, the total outstanding principal amount due and payable pursuant to the Note is $211,023.







2.           No Further Changes; Full Force and Effect.  The additional advances described in Paragraph 1 above reflect all changes to the Amendment and Note Restatement. All other terms of the Amendment and Note Restatement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect, unless and until further supplemented or amended hereafter.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Maker has caused this Supplement No. 1 to Fifth Amendment and Restatement of Loan Agreement and Promissory Note to be duly executed and delivered as of the day and year first written above.


 



	
BLINK COUTURE, INC.


	  	  
	
By:

	
/s/ Lawrence Field


	  	
 Name: Lawrence Field


	  	
 Title: President & CEO


	  	  
	
REGENT PRIVATE CAPITAL, LLC


	  	  
	
By:

	
/s/ Cindy S. Field


	  	
 Name:  Cindy S. Field


	  	
 Title: Secretary
EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the quarterly report of Golden State Vintners, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, John Kelleher, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbannes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:

(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|/s/JOHN KELLEHERJohn Kelleher
Chief Financial Officer
February 13, 2003 |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|                                                                        |  | 

---

QuickLinks
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3463

Rikon Power Tools Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | by     | /s/ Richard J. Cantele, Jr.                                               |   | by     | /s/ B. Ian McMahon                                          |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |            Richard J. Cantele, Jr.               |   |   |            B. Ian McMahon          |
|   |   |            President and Chief Executive Officer |   |   |            Chief Financial Officer |
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

John P. McLaughlin, President and Chief Executive
Officer, and Christine R. Larson, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, of PDL BioPharma, Inc. (the Registrant), each hereby certifies in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on his or her knowledge:

(1) The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2009 of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Registrant.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 will be provided to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated: March 1, 2010



By:/s/    JOHN P.
MCLAUGHLIN John P. McLaughlin President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)/s/    CHRISTINE R.
LARSON Christine R. Larson Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
HOUSING AND TERMINALS

Form End Shut

POLYMERIC MATERIALCASE MADE FROM 

PVC INSULATED WIRE26AWG

1

4

1

±26

100° ±5°

 51.50 ±1 

5.5

1

26

±3

 

R10.5

+

-

4.5

 6.35 

STANDARD STD-GEN-026 2 PLACE ±0.05mmUNILATERAL AND OFFSET BILATERAL TOLERANCES ARE REGULATED BY 1 PLACE ±0.1mm0 PLACE ±0.5mmTOLERANCES:  : INDICATES A CRITICAL CHARACANGLES ±5°

NAME DATE

DRAWNCHECKEDAPPROVED

D
Director Compensation Schedule



 EXHIBIT 10.28 
 Director Compensation Schedule 
 Pre-Offering 

Commencing January 1, 2011 and terminating upon the completion of the offering, Robert Deuster, R. Douglas Norby and Bruce Rhine and Richard Post will
each receive $5,000 per calendar quarter for their services as directors. 
 Post-Offering 

Upon the completion of the initial public offering of shares of our common stock, each non-employee director is entitled to the following: 

Annual retainer fees for service on the board of directors (for participation in up to five meetings per year): 

 

					
	 Each director
	  	$	25,000	  

 Additional annual retainer fees
for board of director committee service: 
  

					
	 Chair of audit committee (for participating in up to six meetings per year)
	  	$	10,000	  
	 Other members of audit committee (for participating in up to six meetings per year)
	  	$	1,500	  
	 Chair of compensation committee (for participating in up to three meetings per year)
	  	$	5,000	  
	 Other members of compensation committee (for participating in up to three meetings per year)
	  	$	1,500	  
	 Chair of governance and nominating committee (for participating in up to three meetings per year)
	  	$	5,000	  
	 Other members of governance and nominating committee (for participating in up to three meetings per year)
	  	$	1,500	  

 A non-employee director who
participates in a board of director or committee meeting in addition to the number of meetings set forth above in a given year will receive an additional $1,000 per meeting attended in person and $500 per meeting attended by telephone. 

Also, effective at our first annual meeting of stockholders after the completion of this offering and on the date of each annual meeting thereafter, each
non-employee director shall receive a grant of restricted stock units equal to 6/100ths of 1% (0.06%) of our issued and outstanding common stock outstanding as of the record date for such annual meeting, with each such grant to vest in four equal
quarterly installments commencing on the date of such annual meeting.