alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4207 

To allow for one-time distributions from certain transportation fringe benefit 

accounts. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 12, 2022 

Mrs. GILLIBRAND (for herself and Mr. SCHUMER) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To allow for one-time distributions from certain 

transportation fringe benefit accounts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘COVID–19 Commuter 

5 Benefits Distribution Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 4207 IS

1 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN DISTRIBUTIONS FROM 

2 TRANSPORTATION FRINGE BENEFIT AC3 COUNTS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—In the case of any qualified pay5 ment from a specified transportation fringe benefit ac6 count— 

7 (1) such qualified payment shall be includible in 

8 the gross income of the employee for the taxable 

9 year in which such qualified payment is made, and 

10 (2) the determination of whether any other pay11 ment from such account is a qualified transportation 

12 fringe for purposes of section 132 of the Internal 

13 Revenue Code of 1986 shall be determined without 

14 regard to such qualified payment. 

15 (b) QUALIFIED PAYMENT.—For purposes of this sec16 tion, the term ‘‘qualified payment’’ means a one-time pay17 ment made during the 6-month period beginning on the 

18 date of the enactment of this Act from a specified trans19 portation fringe benefit account to the employee for whose 

20 benefit such account is maintained but only to the extent 

21 that such payment does not exceed the lesser of— 

22 (1) the highest balance of such account during 

23 the period beginning on March 13, 2020, and ending 

24 on the date of the enactment of this Act, or 

25 (2) the balance of such account on the date of 

26 such one-time payment. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 4207 IS

1 (c) SPECIFIED TRANSPORTATION FRINGE BENEFIT

2 ACCOUNT.—For purposes of this section, the term ‘‘speci3 fied transportation fringe benefit account’’ means, with re4 spect to any employee, amounts set aside by such employ5 ee’s employer under a compensation reduction agreement 

6 which— 

7 (1) provides for payments to such employee of 

8 amounts which are excludible under section 132 of 

9 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as a qualified 

10 transportation fringe (determined after the applica11 tion of subsection (a)), and 

12 (2) provides that unused amounts at the end of 

13 a month may be carried forward to the succeeding 

14 month (subject to such requirements or limitations 

15 as such agreement, the Secretary of the Treasury, or 

16 the Secretary’s delegate, may provide). 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
#### VICTORIA ANNE STEELE, Minor, by her Next Friend, BEATRICE C. TROTTER, v. GEORGE EDISON BROWN, Original Defendant, and HERBERT RUSSELL YORK, Additional Defendant.

(Filed 10 May, 1961.)

Appeal by original defendant George Edison Brown from *Preyer, J.,*28 November 1960 Term of RaNdolph.

Civil action to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly caused by the actionable negligence of the original defendant George Edison Brown.

The plaintiff Virginia Anne Steele was riding as a passenger in an automobile driven by Betty Ann Stockwell on 17 August 1959, when the Stockwell automobile was involved in a collision with an automobile driven by defendant Brown. Plaintiff’s case was consolidated and tried with the case of Betty Ann Stockwell, minor, by her next friend, George E. Stockwell, against the same defendants here, which case is reported *ante*662, 119 S.E. 2d 795, and is hereby referred to for the pleadings, for the facts, and for the bringing in of the additional defendant York by the original defendant Brown. The complaint of the plaintiff here, with the exception of a description of her injuries, and the answer of the defendant Brown are identical with the pleadings in the *Stockwell*case, except as to the description of Betty Ann Stockwell’s injuries in her complaint. The evidence is the same in both cases. Separate appeals were brought up in each case.

Separate issues were submitted in the instant case, which are identical with the issues submitted in the *Stockwell*case, and they were answered identically as the issues were answered in the *Stockwell*case, except that in the instant case the damages awarded were $3,750.00.

Plaintiff at the suggestion of the court agreed to a *remittitur*in the verdict in the sum of $1,875.00. Whereupon, the court entered judgment that plaintiff recover from the original defendant Brown the sum of $1,875.00 with costs, and that the original defendant Brown recover from the additional defendant York the sum of $937.50 with one-half of the costs as contribution by virtue of G.S. 1-240.

From the judgment the original defendant Brown appeals.

*Miller & Beck By: Adam W. Beck for plaintiff, appellee.*

*Coltrane ■& Gavin By: T. Worth Coltrane for defendant, appellant.*

PeR CuRiam.

The assignments of error by defendant Brown in this case are identical with his assignments of error in the *Stockwell*case, with the exception that here there is no assignment of error to the evidence. The briefs in both cases are the same, with the exception *678of a discussion in the briefs in the *Stockwell*case of the challenged evidence in Betty Ann Stockwell’s testimony as to the need of an operation, if she wants to wear hose.

Upon authority of the *Stockwell*case, *ante*662, 119 S.E. 2d 795, we hold that the trial court properly overruled defendant Brown’s motion for a judgment of involuntary nonsuit renewed at the close of all the evidence.

The other assignments of error are without merit, and are overruled.

In the trial below we find

No error.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Plant Science Research: Raleigh, NC
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Raleigh, North Carolina Plant Science Research Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Research Projects Subjects of Investigation at this LocationEach ARS research project has related subjects of investigation.  Listed below are the subjects of investigation currently conducted at this location.
Clicking on a subject of investigation will list the research projects within that  subject of investigation.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
****

**MOTOR MODEL: FK280**

# image1.jpeg

# image2.jpeg

# image3.jpeg

# image4.png

# image5.png
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       3,432,614
<SECURITIES>                                 2,976,443
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,700,092
<ALLOWANCES>                                   280,000
<INVENTORY>                                  4,767,537
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            17,050,977
<PP&E>                                      20,077,383
<DEPRECIATION>                              13,154,590
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,346,314
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,635,679
<BONDS>                                      8,163,307
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       233,916
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,131,648
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,346,314
<SALES>                                     12,155,526
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,155,526
<CGS>                                       11,334,721
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,736,570
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               471,897
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               259,506
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             807,411
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (17,387,662)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (17,387,662)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (17,387,662)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.79)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.79)
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit
      32.1**


**CERTIFICATION**
 
 Pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Industrial Enterprises
        of
        America, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to
        such officer’s knowledge, that the Company’s Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly
        Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 fully complies
        with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained
        in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
        condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the period
        presented in this report.
 
 Dated: December
        5,2006
  /s/ John D. Mazzuto
 **John
        D. Mazzuto**
 Chief
        Executive Officer
  
 The
        foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
        1350 and is not being filed as part of this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly
        Report on Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-11587

Dingsheng Sales (USA) Co., Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
Exhibit 31.1


CERTIFICATION


I, Daniel P. O’Day, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this Amendment No.1 on Form 10-K/A of Gilead Sciences, Inc.; and


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.





Date:April 17, 2019/S/    DANIEL P. O’DAYDaniel P. O’DayChairman and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000882087
<NAME>                        CUMBERLAND TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           3,698,506
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          2,722,489
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            0
<EQUITIES>                                     602,194
<MORTGAGE>                                     940,304
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 8,393,732
<CASH>                                         2,000,147
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             2,898,422
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         1,601,427
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 20,706,550
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                4,576,539
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            4,843,606
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 367,906
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                2,281,429
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       5,816
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   20,706,550
<PREMIUMS>                                     9,617,792
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            333,462
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             129,101
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 1,374,895
<BENEFITS>                                     2,394,532
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    2,895,834
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           4,980,128
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,184,756
<INCOME-TAX>                                   36,686
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,148,070
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,148,070
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        0



</TABLE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3454

Yaesu USA Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 48 (Monday, March 13, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Pages 13513-13514]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6181]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


United States International Trade Commission

[USITC SE-95-05]

TIME AND DATE: March 23, 1995 at 2:30 p.m.

PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street S.W., Washington, DC 20436.

STATUS:

1. Agenda for future meeting
2. Minutes
3. Ratification List
4. Inv. Nos. 701-TA-360-361 and 731-TA-688-695 (Final) (Certain 
Carbon Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings from France, India, Israel, 
Malaysia, Korea, Thailand, the United Kingdom, and Venezuela)--
briefing and vote.
5. Outstanding action jackets:
    1. ID-95-010, Annual report in Inv. No. 332-237, Production 
Sharing: Use of U.S.-Made Components and Materials in Foreign 
Assembly Operations, 1990-1993.

    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    By order of the Commission:

    [[Page 13514]] Issued: March 8, 1995.
Donna R. Koehnke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-6181 Filed 3-9-95; 9:19 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
_ 

c ,,’ \ 

. 

,. .~._,_ 

I -- 

‘i 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 
Itt 8dditim b the iaow hitrot8aPo 

8tatod m 8tate that Oh0 Duaaret.10 i&ndnee 

r u a u4 l r t1 ti.d b y t;b Daworet10 uolmBitto0. 

It&t~o,opln’ot~ his auzm mhodd be printed on 

. 

St is our opinion nlrthor, thet the
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 26, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-11700

Bear Down Brands LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
## NO. 12

- 14

- 00252

- CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN RE:
PERCY FROMAN,

RELATOR §
§
§ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM Relator, Percy Froman, requests a writ of mandamus directing the tria l court to forward his postconviction application for writ of habeas corpus to the court of criminal appeals. The court of criminal appeals has recently reiterated that because it has exclusive Article 11.07 jurisdiction, an intermediate appellate court h as no jurisdiction to rule on matters pertaining to a pending Article 11.07 application. See Padieu v. Court of Appeals of Tex., Fifth Dist. , 392
S.W.3d 115, 117

- 18 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013); see also T EX

. C ODE C RIM

. P ROC

. A NN

. art. 11.07 (West Supp. 2014). Relator asserts that the trial court received his habeas application on
October 29, 2013. Therefore, his complaint relates to a pending Article 11.07 application. Consequently, we have no jurisdiction to address the merits of his complaint. See Padieu
, 392
S.W.3d at 117

- 18. Accordingly, we dismiss Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. Opinion delivered October 8, 2014. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

( DO NOT PUBLISH )

## COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

OCTOBER 8 , 2014

NO. 12

- 14

- 00252

- CR

PERCY FROMAN, Relator V. HON. CHRISTI J. KENN EDY ,

Respondent

O RIGINAL P ROCEEDING ON THIS DAY came to be heard the petition for writ of mandamus file d by PERCY FROMAN on September 2, 2014, and the same having been duly considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that a writ of mandamus should not issue, it is therefore CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the said petition for writ of mandamus be, and the same is, hereby D ISMISSED

.

By per curiam opinion

. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle , J

.
MOTOR MODEL: RS540/RS545

VIEW 1 VIEW 2 VIEW 3