alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-1880

GHL International, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
chyu_ex108.htm


EXHIBIT 10.8




 


TERMINATION AGREEMENT


 


The undersigned parties hereby agree that the Employment Agreement dated as of November 2, 2009 and effective as of July 1, 2009 (the “Employment Agreement”) by and between China Youth Media, Inc. (the “Company”) and Jay Rifkin (“Rifkin”) is hereby terminated with immediate effect and neither party shall have any further responsibility or liability thereunder, except as the parties have otherwise agreed pursuant to that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of June 1, 2011 among the Company, China Youth Media Merger Sub, Inc., and Midwest Energy Emissions Corp. (the “Merger Agreement”) and closing thereunder.  The consideration Rifkin is receiving pursuant to the Merger Agreement and related documents is deemed to be in full payment for all amounts owed under the Employment Agreement.







Each of the undersigned parties acknowledges that he/it has been informed of Section 1542 of the California Civil Code which reads as follows:  A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his favor at the time of executing the release, which if known by him must have materially affected his settlement with the debtor.  In signing this Agreement, the each of the undersigned parties hereby waives any rights or benefits which he/it has or may have under Section 1542 to the fullest extent that he/it may lawfully waive such claims and benefits pertaining to the subject matter of this Agreement.







This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns.


 


            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Termination Agreement as of the 21st day of June, 2011. 




 





	 	
CHINA YOUTH MEDIA, INC.


 

	 
	 	By:	

/S/Richard MacPherson



	 
	 	Name: 

Title:	 	 
	 	
 


 

	 	 
	 	/S/Jay Rifkin	 
	 	
JAY RIFKIN
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATIONS





Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted), Mark A. Fletcher, Interim Chief
Executive Officer and President of Generex Biotechnology Corporation (the
"Company"), and Rose C. Perri, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each
hereby certifies that, to the best of their knowledge:





1.           The
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2010 to
which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the "Report") fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and





2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of
the period covered by the Report.





DATE:
      December 10, 2010
              By: /s/ Mark A. FletcherMark
      A. FletcherInterim
      President & Chief Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)DATE:
      December 10, 2010
              By: /s/ Rose C. PerriRose
      C. PerriChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting
Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 47 (Friday, March 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 13205]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5877]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of the Comptroller of the Currency


Information Collection Submitted to OMB for Review

AGENCY: Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of information collection submitted to OMB for review 
and approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Office of the Comptroller of 
the Currency (OCC) hereby gives notice that it has sent to the Office 
of Management and Budget (OMB) a Paperwork Reduction Act Submission 
regarding an information collection titled Examination Questionnaire.

DATES: Comments on this information collection are welcome and should 
be submitted by March 31, 1995.

ADDRESSES: A copy of the submission may be obtained by calling or 
writing the OCC contact.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the requirements of the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Office of 
the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) has sent to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) a Paperwork Reduction Act Submission 
regarding the following information collection:
    Type of Review: Expedited.
    Title: Examination Questionnaire.
    Description: The OCC will collect information from each recently 
examined financial institution regarding bank management's views on the 
OCC examination. The OCC will use this information to resolve 
identified difficulties in the examination process, and to improve its 
service to the banking industry. This is a revision of a similar 
information collection approved under the same OMB Control Number and 
titled Customer Service Information Collections.
    Form Number: CC 2000-01.
    OMB Number: 1557-0199.
    Respondents: Businesses or other for-profit.
    Number of Respondents: 3,200.
    Total Annual Responses: 4,800.
    Average Hours Per Response: 10 minutes.
    Total Annual Burden Hours: 800.
    OMB Reviewer: Milo Sunderhauf, (202)395-7340, Paperwork Reduction 
Project 1557, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10226, New 
Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    OCC Contact: John Ference or Jessie Gates, (202)874-5090, 
Legislative and Regulatory Activities Division, Office of the 
Comptroller of the Currency, 250 E Street, SW, Washington, DC 20219.
    Comments: Comments regarding the submission should be addressed to 
both the OMB reviewer and the OCC contact listed above.

    Dated: March 6, 1995.
James F.E. Gillespie,
Director, Legislative & Regulatory Activities.
[FR Doc. 95-5877 Filed 3-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-33-P
#### HESTER A. McKINNEY v. L. H. DILL and Wife, MAY DILL.

(Filed 25 February, 1948.)

Appeal and Error § 2—

Tbe court, being of opinion that plaintiff’s proof failed to correspond in some respects with her complaint, ordered a mistrial. Defendants appealed for failure of the court to rule on their motions to nonsuit, and plaintiff appealed on account of the statement of the court that the complaint needed amendment to conform to the proof. *Held:*Both appeals are premature and are dismissed.

Appeal by plaintiff and defendants from *Nettles, J.,*at September Term, 1947, of MadisoN.

Both appeals dismissed.

*Carl B. Stuart for plaintiff.*

*J. M. Bailey, Jr., for defendants.*

Per Curiam.

At tbe close of plaintiff’s evidence tbe defendants moved for judgment of nonsuit. Tbe trial judge, without ruling on tbe motion, expressed tbe view that tbe plaintiff’s evidence did not in some respects correspond with her complaint, and in bis discretion and *ex mero motu*withdrew a juror and ordered a mistrial, with permission to tbe plaintiff to amend her complaint. Tbe defendants appealed, for that tbe court failed to rule on their motion to nonsuit, and plaintiff likewise appealed on account of tbe statement by tbe court that tbe plaintiff’s complaint needed amendment to conform to tbe proof.

It is apparent that both appeals are premature, and must be dismissed. No judgment or final order, or order affecting a substantial right, has been entered below, and tbe cause remains on tbe dopket of tbe Superior Court of Madison for such proceedings as may seem advisable to tbe parties. *Johnson v. Ins. Co.,*215 N. C., 120, 1 S. E. (2d), 381. See also *Ten' Broeck v. Orchard,*79 N. C., 518.

*540Tbe defendants’ demurrer *ore terms,*interposed for the first time in tbis Court, is not presently presented.

Plaintiff’s appeal: Dismissed.

Defendant’s appeal: Dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 41 (Thursday, March 2, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 11698]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5319]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


Commodity Futures Trading Commission

time and date: 10:00 a.m., Tuesday, March 21, 1995.

place: 2033 K Street NW., Washington, DC 8th Floor Hearing Room.

Status: Closed.

matters to be considered: Enforcement Matters.

contact person for more information: Jean A. Webb, 202-254-6314.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 95-5319 Filed 2-28-95; 3:32 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<MULTIPLIER>  1000

<CAPTION>
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                              0
<SECURITIES>                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                   32886
<ALLOWANCES>                     1109
<INVENTORY>                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                33459
<PP&E>                           9555
<DEPRECIATION>                   6627
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  45935
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           26376
<BONDS>                             0
<COMMON>                          104
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                         0
<OTHER-SE>                      17348
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    45935
<SALES>                        104887
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               104887
<CGS>                           87692
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   87692
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                18287
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               1328
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (2420)
<INCOME-TAX>                    (1408)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (1012)
<DISCONTINUED>                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                    (1012)
<EPS-BASIC>                    (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                    (.11)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, James S. Murphy, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Hypertension Diagnostics, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: May 15, 2006                                                       /s/ James S. Murphy   James S. Murphy   Chief Financial Officer  
25
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk October 24, 2011

y1017 

# Order

October 24, 2011

143518

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 143518 COA: 304080 Muskegon CC: 08-057102-FC LUKE MORRIS ABBEY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the June 22, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
## IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________



### m 99-11328 Summary Calendar

_______________



### D ONNA 

### J. S TEVENS 

### -S MITH


### ,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS



### GEICO I NSURANCE 

### C OMPANY


### , Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (3:99-CV-1020)

_________________________ April 5, 2000

Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

D o nna Stevens-Smith sued her former employer for sexual harassment and retaliation under title VII. In a comprehensive

mem o randum opinion and order entered on November 3, 1999, the district court carefully explained that Stevens-Smith has produced no summary judgment evidence of harassment or retaliation.

It is evident that Stevens-Smith was fired because, as she admits, she refused to follow her supervisor’s specific instruction to change her method of p rocessing her work. As the district court found, most of the statements of which she c o mplains were made beyond the limitations p erio d, but even assuming arguendo that this action is not time-bar r ed,

n o ne of the alleged actions or statements can fairly be deeme d sexual harassment or retaliation.

Stevens-Smith bases her cla i m on little

more than self-serving speculation designed to obscure poor job performance. Essentially for the re a sons persuasively set forth by the * Pursuant to 5 T H C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion sho uld not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.2

district court, the judgment is AFFIRMED.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

October 26, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-1042

Engel Machinery, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 49 (Tuesday, March 14, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13732-13733]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6237]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Wrangell-St. Alias National Park and Reserve; Proposed Plan of 
Operations to Conduct Mining Operations

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the provisions of 
section 2 of the Act of September 28, 1976, 16 U.S.C. 1901 et seq., and 
in accordance with the provisions of Sec. 9.17 of Title 36 Code of 
Federal Regulation part 9 [[Page 13733]] subpart A, James Moody has 
filed a proposed plan of operations to conduct mining operations on 
lands embracing the Bonanza Creek No. 1 through No. 6, placer claims 
within the Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve.

ADDRESSES: This plan of operations is available for inspection during 
normal business hours at the following locations:

Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve, Mile 105.5 Old 
Richardson Highway, Glennallen, Alaska 99588
Alaska Regional Office--Minerals Management Division, National Park 
Service, 2525 Gambell Room 107, Anchorage, Alaska 99503-2892

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jonathan B. Jarvis, Superintendent, Wrangell-St. Elias National Park 
and Preserve, Post Office Box 29, Glennallen, Alaska 99588, (907) 822-
5234.
Robert D. Barbee,
Alaska Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 95-6237 Filed 3-13-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Inconnection with the quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof Hard Rock Hotel, Inc. (the “Company”) for the six month period endedJune 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), Peter A. Morton, as Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, and James D. Bowen, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, eachhereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of hisknowledge:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/  Peter A. Morton            |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|
| Name:  Peter A. Morton          |
| Title:  Chief Executive Officer |
| Date:  August 15, 2005     |
|                            |
| /s/  James D. Bowen             |   |
| Name:  James D. Bowen           |
| Title:  Chief Financial Officer |
| Date:  August 15, 2005     |

 

Thiscertification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

 

 

----
#### ALICE SIMMONS v. W. H. SIMMONS.

(Filed 17 November, 1926.)

Appeal by defendant from *Schenck, J.,*at June Term, 1926, of ANSON. Affirmed.

*McLendon .& Covington for plaintiff.*

*Enos T. Edwards and Vann & Milliken for defendant.*

Pee CueiaM.

This is an action to have a reasonable subsistence and counsel fees paid or secured to the plaintiff from the estate or earnings of the defendant, her husband, as provided in 3 C. S., 1667. The plaintiff’s motion was heard upon the pleadings, the affidavits, and the oral testimony, and it was adjudged that the defendant pay the plaintiff’s attorneys $100 for their services, and that he pay into the office of the *clerk*$35 a month *for*the benefit of the plaintiff and *her*child. The judgment must be affirmed upon the authority of decisions heretofore rendered, there being no charge of adultery against the plaintiff. *McManus v. McManus,*191 N. C., 740; *Price v. Price,*188 N. C., 640; *Barbee v. Barbee,*187 N. C., 538; *Anderson v. Anderson,*183 N. C., 139.

Affirmed.