alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3853 

To reauthorize the Maurice D. Hinchey Hudson River Valley National 

Heritage Area, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 16, 2022 

Mrs. GILLIBRAND (for herself and Mr. SCHUMER) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 

Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Maurice D. Hinchey Hudson River Valley 

National Heritage Area, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Maurice D. Hinchey 

5 Hudson River Valley National Heritage Area Reauthoriza6 tion Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3853 IS

1 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE MAURICE D. HINCHEY 

2 HUDSON RIVER VALLEY NATIONAL HERIT3 AGE AREA. 

4 (a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section 

5 909(c) of division II of Public Law 104–333 (54 U.S.C. 

6 320101 note; 110 Stat. 4280; 122 Stat. 824; 133 Stat. 

7 779) is amended, in the matter preceding paragraph (1), 

8 by striking ‘‘$15,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$17,000,000’’. 

9 (b) REAUTHORIZATION.—Section 910 of division II 

10 of Public Law 104–333 (54 U.S.C. 320101 note; 110 

11 Stat. 4281; 127 Stat. 420; 128 Stat. 314; 128 Stat. 3801; 

12 133 Stat. 779), as amended by section 119(e)(6) of divi13 sion G of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022, is 

14 amended by striking ‘‘2023’’ and inserting ‘‘2037’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### H. M. BEASLEY v. HENRY EDWARDS.

(Filed 17 March, 1937.)

Animals § 3—

Where a party lawfully impounds a sow, sells same under provisions of a recorder’s judgment, and pays himself his lawful fees for impounding the sow and his damages caused by the sow, and pays to the owner the amount due him out of the purchase price, O. S., 1850, 1851, the owner may not complain.

*394Appeal by plaintiff from *Granmer, J.,*at September Term, 1936, of JohNstoN.

Affirmed.

Tbis is an action to recover possession of a red sow, described in tbe complaint.

From judgment on tbe pleadings and on admissions at tbe trial, dismissing tbe action, tbe plaintiff appealed to tbe Supreme Court, assigning error in tbe judgment.

*Oiis L. Duncan, Parker & Lee for plaintiff.*

*A. M. Noble for defendant.*

Peb Curiam.

It appears from allegations in the complaint which are admitted in the answer that on or about 1 November, 1935, the defendant lawfully impounded one red sow, which was owned by the plaintiff, and held the said sow in bis possession until bis lawful fees and damages caused by the sow were paid by the plaintiff. C. S., 1850.

It was admitted at the trial that since the commencement of the action, the defendant has sold the sow, as authorized by a judgment of the recorder’s court of Jobnston County, and out of the proceeds of said sale has paid to himself bis lawful fees for impounding the said sow, and bis damages caused by the sow. Plaintiff now has the sow in bis possession, and defendant has paid to plaintiff the amount due him out of the purchase price at the sale. C. S., 1851.

There is no error in tbe judgment dismissing tbe action. It is

Affirmed.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2363

US Industrial Sales LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Credit Union Administration

# TIME AND DATE:

10:00 a.m., Thursday, February 18, 2016.

# PLACE:

Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street (All visitors must use Diagonal Road Entrance), Alexandria, VA 22314-3428.

# STATUS:

Open.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund Quarterly Report.

2. NCUA's Rules and Regulations, Member Business Loans.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Gerard Poliquin, Secretary of the Board, Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Gerard Poliquin,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2016-03210 Filed 2-11-16; 4:15 pm]

 BILLING CODE 7535-01-P
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-10468

Orochem Technologies, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

“Made in China 2025” or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
Exhibit 32.1



Section 1350 Certifications



I, John R. Plachetka, Pharm.D., Chief Executive Officer, and I, John E. Barnhardt, Vice President of Finance and Administration (Principal financial
and accounting officer), of POZEN Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), hereby certify that, to my knowledge:



(1) The Companys periodic report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



*   *   *



|                            |  |                         |  |       |  |              
|--------------------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | ----- |  | -------------
|CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER     |  | CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
|                            | 
|/s/ John R. Plachetka       |  | /s/ John E. Barnhardt  
|John R. Plachetka, Pharm.D. |  | John E. Barnhardt      
|                            |  |                         | 
|Date:                       |  | July 30, 2004           |  | Date: |  | July 30, 2004



31
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mervin S. Kato, certify, that to my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MIPS Technologies, Inc. for the three months ended March 31, 2007 (theForm 10-Q), to which this
certificate is an exhibit fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of MIPS Technologies, Inc. for the three month period covered by the Form 10-Q.

Date: June 28, 2007



By:

/s/ MERVIN S. KATOMervin S. KatoVice President and Chief Financial Officer,MIPS Technologies, Inc


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided by MIPS
Technologies and will be retained by it and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Sholodge, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ending December 30, 2001 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the "Report"),
Leon Moore, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13
                  (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Leon Moore
-----------------------
Leon Moore
Chief Executive Officer
April 8, 2003


<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Sholodge, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ending December 30, 2001 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the "Report"),
Bob Marlowe, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (3)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13
                  (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (4)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Bob Marlowe
-----------------------
Bob Marlowe
Chief Financial Officer
April 8, 2003
#### JANE McPHERSON and Husband, A. B. McPherson, v. S. B. WILLIAMS.

(Filed 20 September, 1933.)

Evidence B lb — Burden of proof on affirmative defense is on defendant, and erroneous placing of burden entitled plaintiff to new trial.

In an action to recover damages for trespass plaintiff bas the burden of proof on the issue, but defendant has the burden of proof on the issue of prescription and adverse user set up by him as á defense, and where the burden of proof on this issue is not properly placed on defendant, a new trial will be awarded, the erroneous placing of the burden of proof on a material matter being reversible error.

Appeal by plaintiffs from *Small, J.,*at March Term, 1933, of Camden.

Civil action to recover' damages in the amount of $50.00 for alleged trespass in cleaning out ditch which separates lands of plaintiffs and defendant and embanking the dirt and debris, thus dug up, on plaintiffs’ side; and to restrain the defendant from further like trespass in the future.

The court placed the burden of proof on the plaintiffs, which is assigned as error, the defendant claiming the right to clean out said ditch and to embank the dirt and debris on both' sides thereof by prescription, or adverse user for more than the requisite number of years.

There was a verdict and judgment for defendant, from which the plaintiffs appeal.

*W. I. Halstead for plaintiffs.*

*B. Glarence Dozier for defendant.*

*178Stacy, C. J.

It is conceded in appellee’s brief that “the burden was upon the defendant to show the easement by prescription, or adverse possession,” the defense being an affirmative one. *Power Co. v. Taylor,*194 N. C., 231, 139 S. E., 381. But in this connection it is asserted that “while in disconnected excerpts, it might appear the burden of proof was improperly placed, yet a careful reading of the entire charge will show the jury could not have been misled.” *Bechtel v. Weaver,*202 N. C., 856, 164 S. E., 338; *Rankin v. Oates,*183 N. C., 517, 112 S. E., 32.

We have held in a number of cases that the erroneous placing of the burden of proof in respect to a material matter constitutes reversible error. *Power Co. v. Taylor, supra.*

True, in the beginning, the plaintiffs had the burden of proof on the issue of trespass, but when the defendant undertook to justify his use of the plaintiffs’ side of the ditch by prescription, or adverse possession, he then assumed the laboring oar. *Hayes v. Cotton,*201 N. C., 369, 160 S. E., 453.

New trial.
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                   Exhibit 10.39

                           METRETEK TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

             SUMMARY SHEET OF COMPENSATION OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

<TABLE>
<S>                          <C>
Annual Retainer:             $2,000 per month (in cash)

Stock Options upon Initial   5,000 shares
Election:

Annual Stock Options:        2,500 shares annually on the date of the Annual
                             Meeting of Stockholders

Terms of Stock Options:      Exercise price = closing price of Common Stock on
                             date of grant Non-qualified stock options (NQSOs),
                             immediate vesting, 10 year term
</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
  **CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  I, Thomas M. Johnson, certify that:
  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Rimpac Resources, Ltd (the "Company");
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; and
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.
 
 4. The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and have:
 
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
 
 b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c) disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting;
 
 5. The Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);
 
 a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Company's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
 b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal controls over financial reporting
 
 */s/ Thomas Johnson*
_______________________________
Thomas Johnson
**RIMPAC RESOURCES LTD**

President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director
October 25, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-30-1999
<CASH>                                              45,894
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          513
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                         45,564
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    98,346
<PP&E>                                             110,331
<DEPRECIATION>                                      62,314
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     154,592
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               38,003
<BONDS>                                              9,172
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                14
<OTHER-SE>                                         101,133
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       154,592
<SALES>                                            378,562
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   378,562
<CGS>                                              275,811
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      275,811
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    79,221
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  (1,201)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     27,844
<INCOME-TAX>                                         9,864
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 17,980
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        17,980
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         1.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         1.31
        


</TABLE>
##### 



METRETEK TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
 Summary Sheet of Compensation of Non-Employee Directors  (Effective January 1, 2007)
 Cash Retainer:
    
    $3,000 per monthMeeting Fees:
    
    $1,500 per meeting of a Committee of the Board, provided (i) no meeting fees are payable if a Board
meeting is held on the same day, and (ii) only one meeting fee is payable per day, regardless of how
many meetings are held that dayStock Options upon Initial 
Election or Appointment:
    
    5,000 shares of Common StockAnnual Stock Options:
    
    Granted annually on the date of the
Annual Meeting of Stockholders
Non-qualified stock options to purchase 7,500 shares of Common StockVesting is one-third upon date of grant, one-third upon first anniversary
of grant date and one-third upon second anniversary of grant dateThe Exercise Price is equal to the fair market value of the Common Stock
on the date of grant (based upon the last sale price of the Common Stock
on such date as reported on the American Stock Exchange or on such other
principal stock exchange or stock market on which the Common Stock is then
listed or traded)Term is 10 years, subject to earlier termination upon death, disability or
termination of service (in which event the term continues for one year
after termination for each year of services on the Board)