alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-1976

Katadyn North America, Inc: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions_03.20.1

9.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Exhibit 10.23

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1

                           APRIA HEALTHCARE GROUP INC.

                     1998 NONQUALIFIED STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

     WHEREAS,  Apria Healthcare  Group Inc. (the "Company")  maintains the Apria
Healthcare Group Inc. 1998 Nonqualified Stock Incentive Plan (the "Plan"); and

     WHEREAS,  the  Company  has the right to amend the  Plan,  and the  Company
desires to amend the Plan to reflect recent resolutions  adopted by its Board of
Directors;

     NOW,  THEREFORE,  the Plan is hereby  amended,  effective  as of January 1,
2001, as follows:

1.   The second  sentence  of Section  1.4 (b) of the Plan is amended to read as
     follows:

     "The  maximum  number of shares  subject to Options and Stock  Appreciation
     Rights that are granted during any calendar year to any individual shall be
     limited to 200,000 shares."

2.   Except as amended  above,  all  provisions of the Plan remain in full force
     and effect and, as amended,  the Plan is hereby  ratified and  confirmed in
     all respects.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  the Company has caused its duly authorized  officer to
execute this Amendment to the Plan on this 31st day of January, 2001.

                           APRIA HEALTHCARE GROUP INC.

                           By:  ________________________________
                                Its:  Executive Vice President,
                                      Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23

                         INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT



To the Board of Directors of:
  37 Point 9


We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of 37 Point 9 and
Subsidiaries as of September 30, 2001 and the consolidated statements of
operations and cash flows for the three and nine-month periods then ended. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial
information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial
data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance
with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the
objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial
statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying financial statements in order for them to be in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming
that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 6 to the
financial statements, the Company's working capital deficiency of $581,672,
stockholders' deficiency of $572,663, net loss from operations of $3,767,489 and
cash used in operations of $3,367,294 raise substantial doubt about its ability
to continue as a going concern. Management's Plan in regards to these matters is
also described in Note 6. The financial statements do not include any
adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

WEINBERG & COMPANY, P.A.


Los Angeles, CA
November 16, 2001
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 6 (Tuesday, January 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 2585]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-509]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-113-000]


Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation; Notice of Tariff 
Filing

January 4, 1995.
    Take notice that on December 30, 1994, Transcontinental Gas Pipe 
Line Corporation (TGPL), herewith submits for filing certain revised 
tariff sheets to its FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, which 
tariff sheets are enumerated in the appendices attached to the filing. 
Such tariff sheets are proposed to be effective February 1, 1995.
    TGPL states that the purpose of the instant filing is to revise 
certain tariff sheets in TGPL's Volume No. 1 Tariff to (i) clean up 
various spelling, punctuation, wording and reference errors (ii) 
eliminate expired producer settlement payment recovery provisions and 
(iii) update the index of purchasers.
    TGPL states that copies of the instant filing are being mailed to 
customers, State Commissions and other interested parties.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 
20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests should 
be filed on or before January 11, 1995. Protests will be considered by 
the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but 
will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. 
Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available 
for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-509 Filed 1-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Ex-99.2 a)


As of and for the year ended December 31, 1999, Cendant Mortgage Corporation
(the Company) has complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing
standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform
Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers. As of and for this same period,
the Company had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and omissions policy in the
amount of $100 million and $50 million, respectively.



Cendant Mortgage Corporation





/s/ Terence W. Edwards                      /s/ Martin Foster
-------------------------------------       --------------------------
Terence W. Edwards                          Martin Foster
President and Chief Executive Officer       Vice President - Servicing
                                            Management Group



Ex-99.2 b)

See Item 15.


<PAGE>


Ex-99.3 a)

May 17, 2000




Dlena Pratt
Norwest Bank
11000 Brokenland Parkway
Columbia, Maryland 21044

RE:      Officer's Certificate
Structured Assets Mortgage Investment
Pass Through Certificates
SAMI 1999-2

Dear Trustee:

The undersigned officer certifies the following for the 1999 calendar year.

1. I have reviewed the activities and performances of the Servicer during the
preceding fiscal year under the terms of the Servicing Agreement, Trust
Agreement, Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or Servicer Guide and to the best
of my knowledge, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its duties, responsibilities
or obligations under these Agreements throughout such year, or if there has been
a default or failure of the Servicer to perform any such duties,
responsibilities or obligations, a description of each default or failure and
the nature and status thereof has been reported to Norwest. No subservicer
exists for 1999-12;

2. I have confirmed that the Servicer is currently an approved FNMA or FHLMC
Servicer in good standing;

3. I have confirmed that the Fidelity Bond, the Errors and Omissions Insurance
Policy and any other bonds required under the terms of the Servicing Agreement,
Trust Agreement, Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or Servicer Guide are in
full force and effect;

4. All premiums for each Hazard Insurance Policy, Flood Insurance Policy (if
applicable) and Primary Mortgage Insurance Policy (if applicable), with respect
to each Mortgaged Property, have been paid and that such insurance policies are
in full force arid effect;

5. All real estate taxes, governmental assessments and any other expenses
accrued and due, that if not paid could result in a lien or encumbrance on any
Mortgaged Property, have been paid, or if any such costs or expenses have been
paid with respect to any Mortgaged Property, the reason for the non-payment has
been reported to Norwest.

6. All Custodial Accounts have been reconciled and are properly funded; and

7. All annual reports of Foreclosure and Abandonment of Mortgaged Property
required per section 6050J and 6050P of the Internal Revenue Code, respectively,
have been prepared and filed.



<PAGE>

Certified by:


/s/ Marc Hinkle
--------------------------
Officer

Director - Loan Servicing
-------------------------
Title

05/17/2000
----------
Date
Order filed Octobe r 20, 2015

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 14

- 00683

- CV

____________ FREDERIC SCOTT DEAVE R , Appellant

V.

RIDDHI DESAI AND SHI LPI PANKAJ DESAI, Appellee

On Appeal from the 295th District Court

Harris County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2014

- 18950



### O R D E R

The clerk’s record was filed November 5, 2014 . Our review has determined that a
relevant item has been omitted from the clerk's record. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c). The record
does not contain a copy of “Shilpi Desai’s Response to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss,” filed
in the trial co urt on July 25, 2014
The Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record on or before October 30, 2015, containing a copy of “Shilpi Desai’s Response to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss,” filed in the trial court on July 25, 2014.If the omitted item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the omitted item is not a part of
the case file.

PER CURIAM
LAQUITA FARLEY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-3911

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 14, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

T. Michael Jones, Judge.

Laquita Farley, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Anne C. Conley, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

PADOVANO, MARSTILLER, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 [subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code]

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 [subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code], the
undersigned officer of Aethlon Medical, Inc. and Subsidiaries, a Nevada
corporation ("the Company"), does hereby certify with respect to the Annual
Report of the Company on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "10-KSB Report") that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


/s/ James A. Joyce
-------------------------
James A. Joyce
Chief Executive Officer

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 [subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code]

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 [subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code], the
undersigned officer of Aethlon Medical, Inc. and Subsidiaries, a Nevada
corporation ("the Company"), does hereby certify with respect to the Annual
Report of the Company on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "10-KSB Report") that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



/s/ Edward C. Hall
-----------------------------
Edward C. Hall
Chief Financial Officer
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2102

Reelcraft Industries:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Cell Wall Biology and Utilization Research: Madison, WI
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Madison, Wisconsin U.S. Dairy Forage Research Center Cell Wall Biology and Utilization Research Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Research Projects Subjects of Investigation at this LocationEach ARS research project has related subjects of investigation.  Listed below are the subjects of investigation currently conducted at this location.
Clicking on a subject of investigation will list the research projects within that  subject of investigation.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATIONS





Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted), Anna E. Gluskin, Chief Executive
Officer and President of Generex Biotechnology Corporation (the "Company"), and
Rose C. Perri, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies
that, to the best of her knowledge:





1.           The
Company's Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period
ended January 31, 2010 to which this Certification is attached as
Exhibit 32 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of
the period covered by the Report.





DATE:
      June 11, 2010
              By: /s/ Anna E. GluskinAnna
      E. Gluskin, Chief Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)DATE:
      June 11, 2010
              By: /s/ Rose C. PerriRose
      C. Perri, Chief Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting
Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                          38,575
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,731
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (236)
<INVENTORY>                                      8,547
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                51,280
<PP&E>                                          21,692
<DEPRECIATION>                                (11,061)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  63,444
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,340
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        214
<COMMON>                                         1,678
<OTHER-SE>                                      52,627
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    63,444
<SALES>                                         13,151
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,151
<CGS>                                           12,435
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,435
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   263
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,389)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,389)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.71)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.71)
        

</TABLE>
#### R. V. BARKLEY and C. A. MULLIS v. GEORGE W. PATTERSON and JOSEPH A. ELLIOTT.

(Filed 14 June, 1933.)

Appeal by plaintiffs from *Warlick, J.,*at November Term, 1932, of MecKLENbueg.

Affirmed.

*A. A. Tarlton and J. E. Woolard for plaintiffs.*

*Paul R. Ervin and H. I. McDougle for defendants.*

Pee CueiaM.

In this cause a judgment was rendered by a justice of the peace in favor of the plaintiffs and the defendants appealed. The ease was not docketed in the Superior Court, at the term next ensuing the trial and no motion for *a recordari*was made at that time; but the trial court found as a fact that counsel for the defendants had not been negligent and had been induced to believe that the controversy would be settled without appeal. Upon the findings of fact the court permitted the appeal to be docketed. The plaintiffs excepted and appealed. The judgment is

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuantto18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Inconnection with the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of Hard Rock Hotel, Inc. (the “Company”) for thequarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Peter A. Morton, as ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, and James D. Bowen, as Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ Peter A. Morton            |   |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Name: Peter A. Morton          |   |   |
| Title: Chief Executive Officer |   |   |
| Date: November 14, 2006   |   |   |
|                           |   |   |
| /s/ James D. Bowen             |   |   |
| Name: James D. Bowen           |   |   |
| Title: Chief Financial Officer |   |   |
| Date: November 14, 2006   |   |   |

 

Thiscertification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

----