alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE v. ERNEST ROOSEVELT ST. CLAIR

(Filed 20 November, 1957)

1. Criminal Law §§ 135, 141—

A judgment that defendant pay the costs and a fine in a stipulated amount is a final judgment, and further provision in the judgment that defendant not be convicted of a similar offense for a period of twelve months is merely surplusage.

*2292. Criminal Law § 169—

Where it appears that on a prior appeal, there was no error in the trial, but through inadvertence the cause was remanded for final judgment when in fact the judgment entered in the superior court, as distinguished from that entered in the recorder’s court, was a final judgment, upon subsequent appeal from the judgment entered after remand, that judgment will be stricken and the original judgment of the superior court declared in effect.

Appeal by defendant from *Rousseau, J.,*at August 1957 Term, of Cabarrus.

Criminal prosecution upon a warrant issued in the County Recorder’s Court of Cabarrus County, as the record and addendum to record show, charging defendant with operation of a motor vehicle upon public highway while under the influence of intoxicants in violation of G.S. 20-138.

*Attorney General Patton, Assistant Attorney General Love for the State.*

*Llewellyn & Green, Marshall B. Sherrin, John R. Boger, Jr., for defendant appellant.*

Winborne, C. J.:

By reference to the opinion on appeal of this case reported in 246 N.C. 183, 97 S.E. 2d, 840, no error was found in the matters to which assignments of error relate. However, in the statement of the case, paragraph 4, on which the opinion was made to rest, the judgment of the Recorder’s Court of Cabarrus County as shown in addendum to the record, was inadvertently referred to, instead of the judgment of the Superior Court “that the defendant pay fine of $100 and cost; and that he be not convicted of a similar offense for a period of 12 months,” entered at the October 1956 Term, — and pursuant thereto, in the last paragraph of the opinion, the cause was remanded for proper judgment on verdict rendered.

In this connection the Court holds that the judgment of Superior Court that the defendant pay fine of $100 and cost is a final judgment. *S. v. Griffin,*246 N.C. 680, _. The super-added provision is merely surplusage. Consequently the order remanding the cause to Superior Court of Cabarrus County for judgment, and the judgment rendered pursuant thereto at the August 1957 Term of Superior Court of said County are hereby striken out. And the original opinion as amended herein will be, and is upheld.

No error.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-10462

James Hardie Building Products, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (No.
333-57339 (as amended), 333-62859 and 333-39485 (as amended)) pertaining to (i)
the 1995 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan and Outstanding Options of
Mariner Health Group, Inc.; (ii) the Paragon Health Network, Inc. Employee Stock
Purchase Plan, and (iii) the Paragon Health Network, Inc. Long-Term Incentive
Plan; GranCare, Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan; GranCare, Inc. 1996 Stock Incentive
Plan; GranCare, Inc. 1996 Replacement Stock Option Plan; GranCare, Inc. Outside
Directors' Stock Incentive Plan; and Evergreen Healthcare, Inc. Employees'
401(k) Profit Sharing Plan, of our report dated March 8, 2002 with respect to
the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Mariner Post-Acute
Network, Inc. included in this Transition Report (Form 10-K) for the three-month
period ended December 31, 2001.



Ernst & Young LLP

March 19, 2002
Atlanta, Georgia
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 19 - 0614 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. GARY HANSEN,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including January 2 9, 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 24 2020

12/24/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0614
Exhibit 32.1



Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Adams Golf, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify that:
The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the "Periodic Report") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  | ADAMS GOLF, INC.                     
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|                   |  |                                      
|Date:  May 9, 2007 |  | By:/S/ OLIVER G. BREWER III          
|                   |  | Oliver G. Brewer, III                
|                   |  | Chief Executive Officer and President
|                   |  |                                      
|Date:  May 9, 2007 |  | By:/S/ ERIC LOGAN                    
|                   |  | Eric Logan                           
|                   |  | Chief Financial Officer              
|                   |  | (Principal Financial Officer)        





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Periodic Report or as a separate disclosure document
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Adams Golf, Inc. and will be retained by Adams Golf, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | by     | /s/  Richard J. Cantele, Jr.                                          | by     | /s/  B. Ian McMahon                                |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |        Richard J. Cantele, Jr.                    |   |        B. Ian McMahon          |
|   |   |        President and Chief Executive Officer |   |        Chief Financial Officer |
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 48 (Monday, March 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 13434]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6111]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[WH-FLR-5170-7]


Tribal Assistance; Grants for Wastewater Facility Construction 
for Native American Tribes Under Section 518(c) of the Clean Water Act

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of Changes in the Guidelines for Applying for Grants 
from the Indian Set-Aside Program.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces: the use of the Sanitary Deficiency 
System (SDS) of the Indian Health Service (IHS) for determining 
priorities and selecting projects for funding under the Indian Set-
Aside (ISA) Program; and the availability of an Addendum detailing 
changes in the process for applying for grants from the ISA program.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Sylvia Bell, Municipal Support 
Division, Office of Wastewater Management (202) 260-7255.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Environmental Protection Agency, Office 
of Wastewater Management, manages an Indian Set-Aside Grant Program 
under Section 518(c) of the Clean Water Act. Public Law 102-389 allows 
the Administrator to reserve up to one-half of one percent of the funds 
appropriated for Fiscal Year 1993 and, thereafter, from the State 
Revolving Fund for making grants to Indian Tribes and Alaska Native 
Villages. The grants are for construction of wastewater treatment 
facilities. The SDS, which is the current IHS system of identifying 
wastewater treatment needs and costs, will be used to determine 
priorities and to select projects to receive funding for Fiscal Year 
1995 and thereafter. The Addendum to the ``Guidelines for Applying for 
Grants from the Indian Set-Aside Program'' details several changes in 
the ISA Program as a result of EPA's adoption of the SDS. The Addendum 
may be obtained by calling Sylvia Bell at (202) 260-7255.

    Dated: March 6, 1995.
Robert Perciasepe,
Assistant Administrator Office of Water.
[FR Doc. 95-6111 Filed 3-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
3XEOLF9HUVLRQRI%&,

380392/87(&$67,1*35(6685(&217$,1,1*+7&$67,521



3,$==$52%(57

35,&(3803&203$1<

2WKHU

12

3XEOLF9HUVLRQRI%&,
 

<(6

12

 .*

 .*

,03257,1*7+,63$57)520&+,1$&2676

385&+$6,1*5$:0$7(5,$/$1'0$&+,1,1*,7'20(67,&$//<&267
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2318

Reelcraft Industries:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-11430

Borch Import and Export, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs and the request failed to show that 

this particular product is available only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 39 / Tuesday, February 28, 1995 / Presidential Documents 10791

Memorandum of February 15, 1995

Delegation of Responsibilities Under Section 1205(d) and

1207(c) of Title XII of Public Law 103–337

Memorandum for the Secretary of State [and] the Secretary of Defense

By the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the

United States of America, including section 301 of Title 3 of the United

States Code, I hereby delegate to the Secretary of State the authorities and

duties vested in the President under sections 1205(d) and 1207(c) of Title

XII of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995 (Public

Law 103–337), to be exercised in consultation with the Secretary of Defense.

The Secretary of State is authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal Register

œ–.

THE WHITE HOUSE,

Washington, February 15, 1995. [FR Doc. 95–5075

Filed 2–24–95; 4:04 pm]

Billing code 4710–10–M
EXHIBIT 23.1


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT




     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
33-94026, 33-51234, 33-75028, 33-77684, 33-57628, 33-80581, 33-80583, 333-42775,
333-89325, 333-89329 and 333-89327 of Apria Healthcare Group Inc. on Form S-8 of
our report dated February 18, 2003, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Apria Healthcare Group Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2002.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Costa Mesa, California
March 28, 2003
----

Exhibit 32.2 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

The undersigned, Jianquan Li, ChiefFinancial Officer of HONG KONG WINALITE GROUP, INC. (the "Company"), DOES HEREBYCERTIFY that: 

1. The Company's Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the "Report"), fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and 

2. Information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operation of the Company. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of theundersigned has executed this statement this 19th day of August 2008.

|   | /s/ Jianquan Li                  |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Jianquan Li                                                                                                           |
|   | Chief Financial    Officer                                                                                            |
|   | (Principal Financial    Officer)                                                                                      |

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to Hong Kong Winalite Group, Inc. and will beretained by Hong Kong Winalite Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

The forgoing certification is being furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It isnot being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing ofthe Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of anygeneral incorporation language in such filing. 

----
#### William Avon NEAL *v.*STATE of Arkansas

CR 98-1318

979 S.W.2d 93

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered November 19, 1998

*John L. Kearny,*for appellant.

No response.

Per Curiam.

Appellant, William Avon Neal, by his attorney, John L. Kearney, has filed a motion for belated appeal. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. *See Terry v. State,*272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981); *In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases,*295 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

Because appellant’s attorney admitted fault and his motion was proper under Ark. R. App. P. — Crim. 2, the motion to file belated appeal was granted, and the per curiam was treated as a motion for rule on the clerk.

A copy of this per curiam will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. *In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases,*265 Ark. 964.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 48 (Monday, March 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 13431]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6039]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-198-000]


Northwest Pipeline Corp.; Notice of Petition for Grant of 
Expedited Limited Waiver of Tariff

March 7, 1995.
    Take notice that on March 7, 1995, pursuant to Rule 207(a)(5) of 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.207(a)(5), 
Northwest Pipeline Corporation (Northwest) tendered for filing a 
Petition for Grant of Expedited Limited Waiver of Tariff.
    Northwest seeks waiver of Section 25.3(a) of the General Terms and 
Conditions addressing posting of available pipeline capacity and 
Section 11.3 of Rate Schedule TF-1 addressing the availability for 
receipt and delivery changes of capacity associated with expiration of 
a firm transportation contract, both set forth in Third Revised Volume 
No. 1 of Northwest's FERC Gas Tariff, as well as waiver of any other 
necessary tariff provisions, in order to allow Northwest to repost the 
availability of 25,000 MMBtu/day of capacity and to defer disposition 
of such capacity until after March 20, 1995.
    Any person desiring to be heard or protest said filing should file 
a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in 
accordance with sections 385.214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure. All such motions or protests should be filed on or 
before March 14, 1995. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-6039 Filed 3-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-23-00012-CR

XAVIER PATTERSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 211th District Court

of Denton County (F20-962-431)

March 21, 2024

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Womack

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Dana Womack

 Justice Dana Womack