alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Hard Rock Hotel, Inc. (the “Company”) for thequarterly period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Peter A. Morton, as ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, and James D. Bowen, as Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the bestof his knowledge:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Peter A. Morton            |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
| Name: Peter A. Morton          |
| Title: Chief Executive Officer |
| Date: August 14, 2003     |
|                           |
| /s/ James D. Bowen             |   |
| Name: James D. Bowen           |
| Title: Chief Financial Officer |
| Date: August 14, 2003     |

 

This certificationaccompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 andshall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, bedeemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended.

 

----
#### NEW HANOVER COUNTY and C. R. MORSE, City-County Tax Collector, v. ABEL HOLMES and Wire, If Married.

(Filed 26 November, 1952.)

1. Appeal and Error § 31c—

Where judgment is rendered during the December Term of a Superior Court, an appeal to the following Fall Term of the Supreme Court is too late.

2. Taxation § 40h: Dower § 1—

Inchoate dower cannot deprive the purchasers at a tax foreclosure from the present right of possession.

3. Trial § 13: Appeal and Error § 2—

Additional evidence may not be introduced after judgment, and no appeal lies from the denial of a party’s motion to be permitted to introduce such evidence.

Parker, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Appeal by defendants from *Burgwyn, Special Judge,*February Term, 1952, New HaNOver.

Appeal dismissed.

Tax foreclosure action in which both defendants were duly served with summons. They failed to answer and the property was duly sold. Final order was entered 27 April 1951. The cause was heard on two different occasions on motions made by defendants after final judgment, and also on motion of the purchasers for a writ of possession. The defendants excepted to the orders entered and appealed.

*566
      *G. G. Mclntire and Isaac C. Wright for plaintiff appellees.*

*Rodgers & Rodgers for defendant appellants.*

Per Curiam.

At tbe December Term 1951, Burney, J., denied tbe male defendant's motion to vacate tbe decree of foreclosure and tbe deed executed pursuant thereto. Tbe appeal from tbis order comes too late. *Jones v. Jones,*232 N.C. 518, 61 S.E. 2d 335.

At tbe February Term, 1952, Burg'wyn, Special Judge, entered an order directing that a writ of possession issue. *Feme*defendant excepted. Tbe exception is without merit. *Feme*defendant’s inchoate right of dower, if not barred by tbe judgments heretofore entered, does not deprive tbe purchasers of tbe present right of possession.

On 17 May 1952, Morris, J., denied defendants’ motion to be permitted to supplement tbe testimony at tbe prior bearing by filing additional documentary evidence “for further consideration.” No appeal lies from said order. Indeed, tbe judge was without authority to augment tbe evidence at that stage of tbe proceedings.

Tbe defendants have bad their day in court. They were accorded a full opportunity to be beard before tbe order of foreclosure was entered. Their present unfortunate predicament is due to their own negligence from which tbe Court can afford them no relief.

Appeal dismissed.

Parker, J., took no part in tbe consideration or decision of tbis ease.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 7 (Wednesday, January 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 2751]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-598]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

Agreement(s) Filed

    The Federal Maritime Commission hereby gives notice that the 
following agreement(s) has been filed with the Commission pursuant to 
section 15 of the Shipping Act, 1916, and section 5 of the Shipping Act 
of 1984.
    Interested parties may inspect and obtain a copy of each agreement 
at the Washington, DC Office of the Federal Maritime Commission, 800 
North Capitol Street, NW., 9th Floor. Interested parties may submit 
protests or comments on each agreement to the Secretary, Federal 
Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573. within 10 days after the 
date of the Federal Register in which this notice appears. The 
requirements for comments and protests are found in Sec. 560.602 and/or 
572.603 of title 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations. Interested 
persons should consult this section before communicating with the 
Commission regarding a pending agreement.
    Any person filing a comment or protest with the Commission shall, 
at the same time, deliver a copy of that document to the person filing 
the agreement at the address shown below.
    Agreement No.: 224-200906.
    Title: Southdown, Inc./Eastern Cement Corp. Stevedoring Terminal 
Agreement.
    Parties: 
    Southdown, Inc. (``Southdown'')
    Eastern Cement Corp. (``Eastern'')

    Filing Agent: Charles H. Still, Jr. Bracewell & Patterson, L.L.P., 
Suite 2900, South Tower Pennzoil Place, 711 Louisiana St., Houston, TX 
77002-2781.
    Synopsis: The proposed Agreement provides that Eastern will lease 
equipment from and perform stevedoring services to Southdown at the 
Port of Palm Beach.

    By order of the Federal Maritime Commission.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
    Dated: January 5, 1995.

[FR Doc. 95-598 Filed 1-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
Exhibit 10.5 


   


 Benoit le Bourgeois 


   


 At this time, Atlis employees are compensated on a split salary/equity basis. Your cash compensation will be
70% of your $140,000.00 annual salary, which equates to $3,769.23 bi-weekly. The remaining 30% of your compensation will be paid by virtue
of a stock award. As a bonus, we will award you an additional 15% stock compensation, so long as we are able. In your case, you will
be awarded 294.06 shares per pay period. Each stock award will become fully vested at the conclusion of each pay period, and we will
issue you an assignment of stock on a quarterly or annual basis. We intend to provide you this benefit for the foreseeable future, but
we reserve the right to revert to a full cash compensation model at any time. At that time and as soon as financially feasible, you will
receive the 30% of your salary that was compensated via stock award. 


   


   


 To thank you for all that you have done to make ATLIS successful, as communicated in December 2020 you were also
awarded 100 shares that are fully vested. 


   


   


   


   


   





	 /s/ Benoit le Bourgeois 
	   
	 Employee Signature
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

October 26, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-1040

Intricate:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

         We  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in the  Registration
Statements (Form S-8 Nos.  33-94026,  33-51234,  33-75028,  33-77684,  33-57628,
33-80581, 33-80583, 333-42775,  333-89325 and 333-89329) pertaining to the Apria
Healthcare  Group  Inc./Homedco  Group,  Inc. Stock  Incentive  Plan, 1992 Stock
Option Plan,  1992 Stock Incentive Plan, 1994 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 1991
Management Stock Purchase Plan, Apria Healthcare Group Inc. Amended and Restated
1992 Stock Incentive Plan, Apria Healthcare Group Inc. 1991  Nonqualified  Stock
Option Plan, 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, 1998  Nonqualified  Stock Incentive Plan
and Philip L. Carter  Non-Qualified  Stock Option  Agreement of our report dated
March 11,  1998,  with  respect to the  consolidated  financial  statements  and
schedule of Apria  Healthcare  Group Inc. for the year ended  December 31, 1997,
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1999.


                                         ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Orange County, California
March 24, 2000
<PAGE>

                                     CONSENT

We have issued our reports dated February 14, 2001 accompanying the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of Daw Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries,
included in the Annual Report of Daw Technologies, Inc., on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2000. We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Daw Technologies,
Inc., on Forms S-3 (File No. 33-73292 effective January 3, 1994, File No.
33-84224 effective March 20, 1995, File No. 33-93656 effective June 30, 1995,
file No. 333-05541 effective July 15, 1996 and file No. 333-38350 effective
September, 2000) and on Forms S-8 (File No. 33-93206 effective June 7, 1995 and
File No. 333-03930 effective April 23, 1996).



                                       /s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP



Salt Lake City, Utah
April 12, 2001
GRP200 SERIES

Model Number: GRF201

Gravity Replacement Water Filter

Docket Number: USTR-2018-0025: Exclusion Request for Water Filtration Products (HTS 8421.21.0000)

PRODUCT SUBMISSIONS:

Model Number: GRF203

Gravity Replacement Water Filter (3 Pack)

Individual DIM: 7.48" x 2.55" x 7.08"

Individual DIM: 2.36" x 2.36" x 7.08"
#### Kate Hogan, Administratrix, etc., Appellant, v. David Henderson and others, Respondents.

Judgment reversed, new trial ordered, costs to abide event.

Opinion by

Daniels, J.
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, AS AMENDED
  1.
    
    the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended June 30,
2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the Exchange Act); and2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: August 12, 2009/s/ Pervez A. QureshiName:
    Pervez A. QureshiTitle:
    President and Chief Executive Officer The foregoing certification which accompanies the Report is not to be deemed filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, or the Exchange Act, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any
general incorporation language in such filing.
#### MRS. GAYNELL HAWKINS, *by*Her Next Friend, MRS. NEAL CAMP, v. J. A. MAUNEY.

(Filed 7 April, 1937.)

Damages § 12—

Where plaintiff, a married minor, introduces evidence that she nevertheless became liable on a note given for money borrowed and used to pay for medical attention for her after the injury, the evidence is sufficient to support the recovery of such item by her as an element of her damages.

Appeal by defendant from *Alley, J.,*at October Term, 1936, of Lincoln.

No error.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries which the plaintiff suffered as the result of a collision dpring the nighttime, on a highway in Lincoln County, North Carolina, between an automobile driven by her husband in which she was riding and an automobile driven by the defendant.

At the date of the commencement of the action, the plaintiff was under the age of twenty-one. The action was begun and prosecuted in her behalf by her duly appointed next friend.

The issues raised by the pleadings and submitted to the jury were answered as follows:

“1. Was the plaintiff injured by the negligence of the defendant, as alleged in the complaint ? Answer: Wes.’

“2. What damages, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover? Answer: ‘$3,800.’”

Prom judgment that plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $3,800, with interest and cost, the defendant appealed to the Supreme Court.

*Jonas & Jonas and H. A. Jonas for plaintiff.*

*W. H. Childs and J. Laurence J ones for defendant.*

*468Pee Curiam.

Only one exception appears in the record in this appeal. The defendant excepted to an instruction by the court to the jury with respect to the second issue. With respect to this issue, the court instructed the jury in effect that they should include in their answer to the second issue any sum which they should find from the evidence was expended by the plaintiff for medical care and nursing which she received because of her injuries.

There was evidence at the trial tending to show that the plaintiff borrowed from the uncle of her husband the sum of $142.50, which she paid to the physician who attended her while she was in the hospital because of her injuries, and that she, as principal, and her husband and mother, as sureties, executed a note for that sum payable to her husband’s uncle. This note has not been paid. There was no evidence tending to show that the sum of $142.50 was an unreasonable or excessive charge for the services rendered to the plaintiff by her physician.

The plaintiff, although a minor and a married woman, assumed personal liability for the expenses incurred by her for medical care and nursing. For this reason she was entitled to recover of the defendant the sum expended by her for that purpose. There was no error in the instruction. See *Bitting v. Goss,*203 N. C., 424, 166 S. E., 302; *Cole v. Wagner, 191*N. C., 692, 150 S. E., 339; and *Bowen v. Daugherty,*168 N. C., 242, 84 S. E., 265. The judgment is affirmed.

Ho error.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 5, 2014

No. 04-14-00628-CR

James SMITH,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR4942W

Honorable Mary D. Roman, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s memorandum opinion of this date, the appeal is 

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.

It is so ORDERED on November 5, 2014.

_____________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 5th day of November, 2014.

_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

SHAWN BLITCHINGTON, 

Appellant, 

v. Case No. 5D23-8

LT Case No. 45-2018-000637

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

________________________________/ 

Decision filed June 20, 2023

Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Nassau County, 

James H. Daniel, Judge. 

Jessica J. Yearly, Public Defender, and 

David Alan Henson, Special Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for 

Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and 

Michael L. Schaub, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED. 

WALLIS, HARRIS and JAY, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-04-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-01-2000
<CASH>                                             160
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,627
<ALLOWANCES>                                       185
<INVENTORY>                                      6,810
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,572
<PP&E>                                          34,600
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,569
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  37,654
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,239
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            50
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,466
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    37,654
<SALES>                                         67,543
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                67,543
<CGS>                                           55,018
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   55,018
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,929
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,043
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,553
<INCOME-TAX>                                       483
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,070
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,070
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4233 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4233

  To amend the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act to provide for 
   critical maintenance and repair of certain Bureau of Reclamation 
         reserved or transferred works, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 17, 2022

 Mr. Barrasso introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act to provide for 
   critical maintenance and repair of certain Bureau of Reclamation 
         reserved or transferred works, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Platte River Basin Critical 
Maintenance and Repair Act''.

SEC. 2. CRITICAL MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR.

    Section 40904 of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (43 
U.S.C. 3204) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(1)(B)--
                    (A) by striking the period at the end and inserting 
                ``; or'';
                    (B) by striking ``(B) a unit'' and inserting 
                ``(B)(i) a unit''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(ii) in the case of reserved or transferred works 
                located within the Platte River Basin, the reserved or 
                transferred works had a structural failure in Bureau of 
                Reclamation infrastructure resulting in a declaration 
                of emergency by the applicable State during the 3-year 
                period ending on the date of enactment of this Act.''; 
                and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(c) Authorization of Appropriations.--In addition to amounts 
otherwise made available to carry out subsection (a), there is 
authorized to be appropriated to carry out that subsection $100,000,000 
for fiscal year 2023, to remain available until expended.''.
                                 <all>
```