alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Lawyer Media, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), William L.
Pollak, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Eric F. Lundberg, as
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

  /s/ WILLIAM L. POLLAK
-------------------------------------
William L. Pollak
President and Chief Executive Officer
August 13, 2004

  /s/ ERIC F. LUNDBERG
------------------------------------
Eric F. Lundberg
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
August 13, 2004

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,


AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection
with the filing by Hong Kong Winalite Group, Inc. (the “Company”) of the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:




(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Dated: November
6, 2009




/s/ Hongxing Gao
              Hongxing
      Gao
exv4w8






Exhibit 4.8




	 	 	 

	To:

	 	THE ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND PLC as Agent
	 
	 	 
	From:

	 	BANK OF CHINA LIMITED, LONDON BRANCH






___ March 2011



Vodafone Group Plc — €4,000,000,000 Revolving Credit Agreement

dated 1 July 2010 (as amended from time to time) (the “Credit Agreement”)


Terms used herein which are defined in the Credit Agreement shall have the same meaning herein
as in the Credit Agreement.



We refer to Clause 2.8 (Additional Lenders).



We, Bank of China Limited, London Branch agree to become party to and to be bound by the terms
of the Credit Agreement as an Additional Lender in accordance with Clause 2.8 (Additional Lenders)
with effect on and from ____ March 2011.



Our Revolving Credit Commitment is €150,000,000.



We confirm to each Finance Party that we:





	(a)	 	have made our own independent investigation and assessment of the financial condition and
affairs of each Obligor and its related entities in connection with its participation in the
Credit Agreement and have not relied exclusively on any information provided to us by a
Finance Party in connection with any Finance Document; and
	 
	(b)	 	will continue to make our own independent appraisal of the creditworthiness of each Obligor
and its related entities while any amount is or may be outstanding under the Credit Agreement
or any Commitment is in force.




The Facility Office and address for notices of the Additional Lender for the purposes of
Clause 32.2 (Addresses for notices) is:





	 	 	Bank of China Limited, London Branch

1 Lothbury, London, EC2R 7DB




This Agreement and any non-contractual obligations arising out of or in connection with it are
governed by English law.



This letter may be executed in any number of counterparts, and this has the same effect as if
the signatures on the counterparts were on a single copy of this letter.




BANK OF CHINA LIMITED, LONDON BRANCH



By:




THE ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND PLC



By:




VODAFONE GROUP PLC



By:





1
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-11510

Wanhua Chemical US Operations, LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
ITEM 1 OF FORM 10Q-SB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001060212
<NAME>                        AGRI BIO-SCIENCES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-2000       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  APR-1-2000        JAN-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-2000       JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                 1               1
<CASH>                          9059            9059
<SECURITIES>                    0               0
<RECEIVABLES>                   0               0
<ALLOWANCES>                    0               0
<INVENTORY>                     0               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                9059            9059
<PP&E>                          160636          160636
<DEPRECIATION>                  0               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  169695          169695
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           289787          289787
<BONDS>                         0               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0               0
<PREFERRED>                     0               0
<COMMON>                        11000           11000
<OTHER-SE>                      (131092)        (131092)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    169695          169695
<SALES>                         0               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                0               0
<CGS>                           0               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                2698            19659
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              7210            11172
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (9908)          (30831)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (9908)          (30831)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0               0
<CHANGES>                       0               0
<NET-INCOME>                    (9908)          (30831)
<EPS-BASIC>                     (0.00)          (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (0.00)          (0.00)



</TABLE>
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed October 27, 2021

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21

- 1653 Lower Tribunal No. 20

- 11446

________________



### Moss & Associates , LLC , etc., et al. , Petitioner s ,

vs. 

### Cory Lapin ,

Respondent.

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari from the Circuit Court for Miami

Dade County, Carlos Lopez , Judge.
Weinberg Wheeler Hudgins Gunn & Dial, LLC

, and Steven D. Gonzalez and Jose O. De La Cruz , for petitioner s

. Shaked Law Firm, P.A., and Sagi Shaked and Cory D. Lapin , for respondent.

Before HENDON, MILLER

, and GORDO , JJ.

HENDON, J.2 Moss & Associates, LLC, Safety Guys, LLC, and Downtown
Development Holdings, LLC (collectively, “Petitioners” )

, seek certiorari

review of the trial court’s order granting Cory Lapin ’s ( “ Respondent ” )

second amended motion for leave to file an amend ed complaint to add a
claim for punitive damages pursuant to section 768.7 2, Florida Statutes
(2021). We deny the petition

.
T he record before this Court reflects that the trial court complied with

the procedural requirements of section 768.72

. The Respondent proffe red
evidence in support of his claim for punitive damages, and following a
hearing, the trial court entered an order finding that the Respondent’s
proffer was sufficient to support the claim. See E.R. Truck & Equip. Corp.

v. Gomont , 300 So. 3d 1230, 1231 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020); see also Event
Depot Corp. v. Frank , 269 So. 3d 559 , 561

- 63 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019)
( recognizing that the scope of an appellate court’s certiorari review is
limited to whether the trial court complied with the procedural requirements

of sec tion 768.72, but certiorari review is not available to review the
sufficiency of the respondent’s evidentiary proffer). We therefore deny the
petition for writ of certiorari. 1

1 The Petitioners also sought to quash the portion of the order under review referencing Downtown Development Holdings because the Respondent’s second amended motion to add a claim for punitive damages did not3 Petition denied.

advance any argument as to Downtown Development Holdings

. This point is well taken but is now moot because the trial court has since entered an agreed order remov ing Downtown Development Holdings from the order under review. The final argument raised by the Petitioners is also now moot.
EXHIBIT 23.1


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (No. 33-62402) pertaining to the 1991 Incentive Stock Option Plan,
Stock Grants and Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreements, the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-93546) pertaining to the 1994 Stock Option Plan,
1994 Director Stock Option Plan and the Written Compensation Agreement with R.
David Ridgeway, the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-21699)
pertaining to the 1994 Stock Option Plan, the Registration Statement on Form S-8
(No. 333-21701) pertaining to the 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and
Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreements, the Registration Statement on Form S-3
(No. 333-06865) pertaining to the registration of 1,614,802 shares of common
stock, the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-14483) pertaining to the
registration of 1,125,580 shares of common stock, the Registration Statement on
Form S-3 (No. 333-21117) pertaining to the registration of 493,895 shares of
common stock, the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-28315) pertaining
to the registration of 318,607 shares of common stock, the Registration
Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-18575) pertaining to the registration of
5,000,000 shares of common stock and $5,000,000 of debt securities of Children's
Broadcasting Corporation of our report dated February 24, 1998 except for notes
2, 9, 13 and 16 which are dated March 13, 1998, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements included in the Annual Reports (Forms 10- KSB) for the
years ended December 31, 1996 and December 31, 1997.


                                               /s/ BDO Seidman, LLP

Milwaukee, Wisconsin
March 30, 1998
GRANT MICHAEL CAMADINE

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 2854

_ ____________________________/

Opinion filed November 3, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Mark J. Borello , Judge

.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public

Defender, Tallahassee , for Ap pellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, C.J., BENTON and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
September 26, 2018 

Warren C. Evans 

Wayne County Executive 

The Honorable Robert E. Lighthizer 

U.S. Trade Representative 

Office of the U.S. Trade Representative 

600 17th Street, NW, Room F516 

Washington, D.C., 20006 

Support for CW Bearing's Request for Exclusion of Bearings From the Additional 

Action Pursuant to Section 301 

Dear Ambassador Lighthizer: 

I am writing this letter in support of the product exclusion requests filed by CW Bearing 

USA, Inc. ("CW Bearing") in response to the 25% ad valorem tariffs on certain 

bearings imported from China. These products support extensive downstream 

manufacturing in the United States, including in my home state of Michigan. Given the 

negative impacts that implementation of such high tariffs will have on these products, I 

respectfully request that certain bearings imported under U.S. Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule ("HTSUS") 8482.10.5052, 8482.99.6595, 8482.99.0050, 8482.91.0040, 

8482.40.0000, 8482.10.5060, 8482.10.5056, 8482.10.5048, 8482.10.5044, 

8482.10.5028, 8428.10.5024, and 8482.10.5016 b~ excluded from the additional 

Section 301 tariffs. 

The 25% additional tariffs on these bearings will cause severe economic harm to U.S. 

interests, including American workers in communities like Northville, Michigan. In 

2017, CW Bearing opened a 50,000 square foot manufacturing and technical center in 

Northville to manufacture steering and braking system components for the North 

American automobile industry. CW Bearing's operations in Michigan provide much 

needed stable, middle-class jobs in the Northville community. Currently, CW Bearings 

employs 54 hardworking Americans, though that number is expected to grow to over 85 

by 2022. The imposition of such high tariffs on the bearing imports needed to support 

this domestic production, however, threaten CW Bearing's expansion plans. 

Wayne County Economic Development Corporation 

500 Griswold, 28th Floor, Detroit, Michigan 48226 
CW Bearing's commitment to U.S. manufacturing is exactly the type of foreign 

investment we should be encouraging in the United States. We should encourage 

companies to invest in the United States, not penalize them for doing so. An exclusion 

from these prohibitively high tariffs will ensure that CW Bearing's intended 

investments in Michigan come to fruition and that their manufacturing operations 

continue to thrive in the United States. 

I look forward to working with you to promote the continued success of CW Bearing in 

Michigan by excluding certain bearings described in CW Bearing s requests from the 

Section 301 tariffs. These exclusions will promote U.S. manufacturing and the creation 

of American jobs in our community. Thank you for your consideration. 

PIP 

Khalil Rahal 

Executive Director 

Wayne County Economic Development Corporation 

Wayne County Economic Development Corporation 

500 Griswold, 28th Floor, Detroit, Michigan 48226
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-1578

Illinois Tool Works:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
<PAGE>

                                 REVOLVING NOTE

$10,000,000                                              September 25, 1996
                                                         Chicago, Illinois

         FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned promises to pay to the order of
HARRIS TRUST AND SAVINGS BANK at the principal office of Harris Trust and
Savings Bank (the "Agent"), in Chicago, Illinois, TEN MILLION DOLLARS
($10,000,000) or, if less, the aggregate unpaid amount of all Revolving Loans
made by the payee to the undersigned pursuant to the Credit Agreement referred
to below, such amount to be paid at the times set forth in the Credit Agreement.

         The undersigned further promises to pay interest on the unpaid
principal amount of each Revolving Loan evidenced hereby from the date of such
Revolving Loan until such Revolving Loan is paid in full, payable at the rates
and at the times set forth in the Credit Agreement. Payments of both principal
and interest are to be made in lawful money of the United States of America.

         This Note evidences indebtedness incurred under, and is subject to the
terms and provisions of, the Credit Agreement dated as of September 25, 1996
(herein, as amended or otherwise modified from time to time, called the "Credit
Agreement") between the undersigned, certain financial institutions (including
the payee) and the Agent, to which Credit Agreement reference is hereby made for
a statement of the terms and provisions under which this Note may or must be
paid prior to its due date or may have its due date accelerated.

         In addition to and not in limitation of the foregoing and the
provisions of the Credit Agreement, the undersigned further agrees, subject only
to any limitation imposed by applicable law, to pay all reasonable expenses,
including reasonable attorneys' fees and legal expenses, incurred by the holder
of this Note in endeavoring to collect any amounts payable hereunder which are
not paid when due, whether by acceleration or otherwise.

         This Note is made under and governed by the internal laws of the State
of Illinois.

                                        GIBRALTAR PACKAGING GROUP, INC.


                                        By  /s/ W E Rose
                                        Title President

<PAGE>
****

**MOTOR MODEL: SF266**

# image1.jpeg

# image2.jpeg

# image3.jpeg

# image4.png

# image5.png
# Sequestration Order for Fiscal Year 2017 Pursuant to Section 251A of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act, as Amended

By the authority vested in me as President by the laws of the United States of America, and in accordance with section 251A of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act (the “Act”), as amended, 2 U.S.C. 901a, I hereby order that, on October 1, 2016, direct spending budgetary resources for fiscal year 2017 in each non-exempt budget account be reduced by the amount calculated by the Office of Management and Budget in its report to the Congress of February 9, 2016.

All sequestrations shall be made in strict accordance with the requirements of section 251A of the Act and the specifications of the Office of Management and Budget's report of February 9, 2016, prepared pursuant to section 251A(9) of the Act.

[FR Doc. 2016-03170

Billing code 3295-F6-P
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-1723

Barnes Group, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn