alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON
PAGES 2 AND 3 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE AND ITS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                              71
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,174
<ALLOWANCES>                                       184
<INVENTORY>                                     36,721
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                71,904
<PP&E>                                          94,600
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,844
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 154,786
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,692
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            95
<OTHER-SE>                                      56,317
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   154,786
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                73,764
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   55,626
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,173
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,575
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,391
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,055
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,336
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,336
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .53
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 45 (Wednesday, March 8, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 12787]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5630]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND HUMANITIES

Museum Advisory Panel (Overview Section); Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting of 
the Museum Advisory Panel (Overview Section) to the National Council on 
the Arts will be held on March 21-23, 1995 from 9:00 a.m. to 6:15 p.m. 
on March 21 and 22 and from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on March 23. This 
meeting will be held in Room M-14 on March 21 and 22 and Room 527 on 
March 23, at the Nancy Hanks Center, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., 
Washington, D.C., 20506.
    This meeting will be open to the public on a space available basis.
    Any interested person may observe meetings or portions thereof, 
which are open to the public, and may be permitted to participate in 
the discussions at the discretion of the meeting chairman and with the 
approval of the full-time Federal employee in attendance.
    If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please 
contact the Office of Special Constituencies, National Endowment for 
the Arts, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20506, 202/682-
5532, TYY 202/682-5496, at least seven (7) days prior to the meeting.
    Further information with reference to this meeting can be obtained 
from Ms. Yvonne M. Sabine, Committee Management Officer, National 
Endowment for the Arts, Washington, D.C. 20506, or call 202/682-5433.

    Dated: March 3, 1995.
Yvonne M. Sabine,
Director, Office of Council and Panel Operations, National Endowment 
for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 95-5630 Filed 3-7-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 48 (Monday, March 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 13504]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6059]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration


National Motor Carrier Advisory Committee; Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FHWA announces a public meeting of the National Motor 
Carrier Advisory Committee. The Committee acts in an advisory capacity 
to the Federal Highway Administrator. It makes recommendations intended 
to improve the safety and productivity of the motor carrier industry 
and the effectiveness of the FHWA's programs and policies. The 
Committee reviews research projects, regulations, and programs 
including those involving commercial motor vehicle licensing and 
taxation, uniformity, and safety. The focus of the meeting will be 
issues and concerns of the motor carrier community, including: (1) 
Regulatory Updates, (2) Overview of the Truck and Bus Safety Summit, 
and (3) Intelligent Transportation Systems.

DATES: The meeting will be from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. on April 4, 
1995, and from 8:30 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. on April 5, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Federal Highway Administration, 400 Seventh Street, SW., 
Room 2201, Washington, DC, 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Sam Rea, HMT-2, Room 3103, 400 
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC, 20590; (202) 366-1724.
    Office hours are from 7:45 a.m. to 4:15 p.m., e.t., Monday through 
Friday, except for Federal holidays.

(23 U.S.C. 315; 49 CFR 1.48)

    Issued on: March 7, 1995.
Rodney E. Slater,
Federal Highway Administrator.
[FR Doc. 95-6059 Filed 3-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P
Opinion issued February 7, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-23-00033-CV

———————————

IN RE DEVAN POOL, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator Devan Pool has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus, contending 

that the protective order issued by the trial court on July 6, 2021 is void. 1

We deny the petition for writ of habeas corpus. TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Countiss and Rivas-Molloy.

1 The relator’s petition does not provide the name or cause number of the 

underlying trial court proceeding, but he asserts that it is pending in the 280th

District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Barbara Stalder, presiding.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-2915

National Presto Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2674

Reelcraft Industries:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 4, 2015

d0901 

# Order

Clerk September 4, 2015

151734(60)

In re NORFLEET/WINBUSH

- BE Y/NEWTON

- BEY/NORFLEET

- BEY, Minors

. SC: 151734

COA: 323116

Macomb CC Family Division:

2013

- 000398

- NA;

2013

- 000399

- NA;

2013

- 000400

- NA;

2013

- 000401

- NA;

2013

- 000402

- NA

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s July 2, 2015

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was

entered erroneously.
EXHIBIT 10.1

GOLDEN SPIRIT ENTERPRISES LTD.

(the “Company”)

Officer and Director Resignation

I hereby resign as Director and Officer of the Company effective immediately.

Dated:  June 24, 2011

/s/: Matt Kelly

	
	Matt Kelly
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3625

ECM Industries LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 7782

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. RANDALL EARL ROBINSON , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro

. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. ( 1:16

- cr - 00324

- NCT

- 1 )

Submitted : May 24, 2021 Decided: June 16, 2021

Before WILKINSON and THACKER , Circuit Judge s, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. James B. Craven, III, Durham, North Carolina, for Appellant. Sandra J. Hairston, Acting United States Attorney, John M. Alsup, Assistant United Sta tes Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Randall Earl Robinson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for

co mpassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i), as amended by the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115

- 391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239. After reviewing the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denyi ng Robinson’s motion. See United States v. Kibble , 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Robinson , No. 1:16

- cr - 00324

- NCT

- 1 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 18, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 47 (Friday, March 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 13182]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5914]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[NAFTA-00168, 00168A, 00168B]


Sara Lee Knit Products, Martinsville, VA, Gretna, VA, Morganton, 
NC; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for NAFTA 
Transitional Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 250(a), Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Titlte 
II, of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 USC 2273), the Department 
of Labor issued a Certification for NAFTA Transitional Adjustment 
Assistance on August 5, 1994, applicable to all workers of the several 
plants and facilities of Sara Lee Knit Products in Martinsville, 
Virginia.
    At the request of the company the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. New findings show that 
the production at Sara Lee Knit Products in Gretna, Virginia and 
Morganton, North Carolina was intergrated with that of Martinsville.
    Other findings show that company imports from Mexico increased in 
the first six months of 1994 compared to the same period in 1993. 
Production ceased at Gretna in September 1994 and at Morganton in 
February, 1995 when all workers were laid off.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers who were adversely affected by increased imports.
    Accordingly, the Department is amending the Martinsville 
certification to include workers at Gretna, Virginia and Morganton, 
North Carolina.
    The amend notice applicable to NAFTA-00168 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of the Martinsville, Virginia plants of Sara Lee 
Knit Products and the Gretna, Virginia and Morganton, North Carolina 
plants of Sara Lee Knit Products who became totally or partially 
separated from employment on or after December 8, 1993 are eligible 
to apply for NAFTA-TAA under Section 250 of the Trade Act of 1994.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 3rd day of March 1995.
Victor J. Trunzo,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 95-5914 Filed 3-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 4.1


                        FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE INDENTURE

                  This First Amendment to the Indenture dated May 30, 2000
(the "Amendment"), is entered into with reference to the Indenture dated as
of March 23, 1998 (the "Indenture"), between Hard Rock Hotel, Inc., a Nevada
corporation (the "Company"), and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as
Trustee (the "Trustee") relating to the Company's 9 1/4% Senior Subordinated
Notes due 2005 (the "Securities").

                  The Trustee, acting with the consent of the Holders of a
majority in principal amount of the Securities then outstanding in accordance
with Section 10.2 of the Indenture, and the Company hereby agree to amend the
Indenture as follows:

         1. DEFINITIONS. Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined
shall have the same meanings set forth in the Indenture.

         2. SECTION 4.3 - LIMITATION ON TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES. Section
4.3(b) of the Indenture is amended to include the following additional language:

                  "(x) the sale to Peter A. Morton or any entity one-hundred
         percent (100%) owned, directly or indirectly, by Peter A. Morton of any
         series of Company preferred stock that contain terms substantially the
         same as the Company's 9 1/4% Series A Cumulative Preferred Stock
         without regard to subscription price or liquidation preference,
         provided that the liquidation preference for any series of preferred
         stock shall be equal to the subscription price for such series of
         preferred stock."

         3. CONFIRMATION. In all other respects, the terms of the Indenture are
hereby confirmed.

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Trustee have executed
this Amendment as of the date first written above.

                              HARD ROCK HOTEL, INC.

                               By:
                                   -------------------------------------------
                                       Peter Morton
                               Title:  Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive
                                       Officer, President and Secretary

                               U.S. BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
                               as Trustee

                               By:
                                   -------------------------------------------
                               Title:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2496

Curtis Instruments, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXHIBIT 32.1**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**In connection with the quarterly report of Payless ShoeSource, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/Afor the period ending July 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Matthew E. Rubel, Chief Executive Officer and President of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.Date: February 21, 2006       /s/ Matthew E. Rubel     Matthew E. Rubel    Chief Executive Officer and President    (Principal Executive Officer)
#### STATE v. WALTER BLUE.

(Filed 25 February, 1942.)

Criminal Law § 80—

When defendant flies no appeal bond or order allowing him to appeal *in forma pauperis,*and fails to make np and serve his statement of case on appeal within the time allowed, the motion of the Attornes'-General to docket and dismiss under Rule 17 will be granted, but when defendant has been convicted of a capital felony this will be done only when no error is apparent on the face of the record.

MotioN by State to docket and dismiss appeal.

*Attorney-General McMullan for the State.*

*No counsel contra.*

Winbobne, J.

At the regular December Criminal Term, 1941, of Superior Court of Buncombe County, the defendant, Walter Blue, was tried upon an indictment charging him with rape. There was verdict of guilty of *rape*as charged in the bill of indictment, upon which judgment of death as required by law was pronounced by the court.

From this judgment defendant gave notice of appeal to the Supreme Court. Appeal bond in the sum of $50 was adjudged sufficient, unless upon the proper showing defendant be permitted to appeal *in forma pauperis.*Defendant was allowed fifteen days in which to make and to serve statement of case on appeal, and the State was allowed statutory time thereafter to make and serve countercase or file exceptions. The Clerk certifies that no case on appeal has been filed in his office, and that “the time agreed upon by counsel for perfecting the appeal” has expired and the appeal has not been perfected, and says: “I have inquired of counsel for defendant and have been informed by him that he does not intend to perfect the appeal.”

The Attorney-General moves to docket and dismiss the case under Rule 17 of the Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court. 213 N. C., 808.

In the absence of apparent error upon the face of the record, the motion is allowed. *S. v. Robinson,*212 N. C., 536, 193 S. E., 701; *S. v. Baldwin,*213 N. C., 648, 197 S. E., 142; *S. v. Morrow,*220 N. C., 441, 17 S. E. (2d), 507.

Judgment affirmed.

Appeal dismissed.