alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Southern Insect Management Research: Stoneville, MS
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Stoneville, Mississippi Southern Insect Management Research Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Research Projects Subjects of Investigation at this LocationEach ARS research project has related subjects of investigation.  Listed below are the subjects of investigation currently conducted at this location.
Clicking on a subject of investigation will list the research projects within that  subject of investigation.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 48 (Monday, March 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 13435]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6071]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


AMBANC Corp.; Formation of, Acquisition by, or Merger of Bank 
Holding Companies

    The company listed in this notice has applied for the Board's 
approval under section 3 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 
1842) and Sec.  225.14 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.14) to 
become a bank holding company or to acquire a bank or bank holding 
company. The factors that are considered in acting on the applications 
are set forth in section 3(c) of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    The application is available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. Once the application has been accepted 
for processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that application or to the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Any comment on an application that 
requests a hearing must include a statement of why a written 
presentation would not suffice in lieu of a hearing, identifying 
specifically any questions of fact that are in dispute and summarizing 
the evidence that would be presented at a hearing.
    Comments regarding this application must be received not later than 
April 6, 1995.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Randall C. Sumner, Vice 
President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166:
    1. AMBANC Corp., Vincennes, Indiana; to merge with First Robinson 
Bancorp, Robinson, Illinois, and thereby indirectly acquire The First 
National Bank in Robinson, Robinson, Illinois.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 7, 1995.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-6071 Filed 3-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

October 18, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2013

IDEC Corporation:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
#### WILTON STANLEY, by His Next Friend, ARTHUR STANLEY, v. THE TOWN OF SMITHFIELD.

(Filed 17 March, 1937.)

Electricity § 5 — Injury from uninsulated wire 23 feet albove ground held not foreseeable.

A complaint alleging that plaintiff, an eleven-year-old boy, was injured when he accidentally threw a small wire attached to an improvised spool across a heavily charged, uninsulated electric wire suspended approximately 23 feet above the ground on a main public highway, *is held*not to state a cause of action.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Cranmer, J.,*at September Term, 1936, of Joi-inston.

Affirmed.

Tbis is an action for actionable negligence, brought by plaintiff against defendant, alleging damage. The defendant demurred to the complaint.

The court below rendered the following judgment: “This cause coming on regularly to be beard before bis Honor, E. H. Cranmer, Judge presiding, and tbe defendant having filed a demurrer herein contending that tbe complaint upon its face does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and tbe same being beard upon said demurrer, and tbe court being of tbe opinion that tbe complaint does not state a cause of action against tbe defendant, and so bolding: It is therefore ordered and adjudged by tbe court that said demurrer be and tbe same is hereby sustained, and that tbis cause be and tbe same is hereby dismissed.

E. H. Cranmer, *Judge Presiding.”*

To tbe foregoing judgment tbe plaintiff excepted, assigned error, and appealed to tbe Supreme Court.

*John A. Narron and Leon G. Stevens for plaintiff.*

*Ward, Standi & Ward for defendant.*

Per Curiam.

The question involved: “Does the complaint state a cause of action wherein it is alleged that a minor boy eleven years old suffered serious bodily injury from an electric current coursing through' bis body, while at play, on a main well-traveled public highway, when be accidentally threw a small wire attached to an improvised spool across the uninsulated electric wires of the defendant whereon 2300 volts of electricity were being transmitted and approximately twenty-three feet above the surface of tbe giound?” We think not.

*387The plaintiff cites many decisions in this State sustaining liability, but none go so far as the facts in the present cause. We think the court below correct in sustaining the demurrer of defendant. *Parker v. R. R.,*169 N. C., 68.

The judgment of the court below is

Affirmed.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2098

Reelcraft Industries:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3139

Speck Pumps-Pool Products, Inc: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions.

pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
**Certifications      of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**

| (1)   | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                November 8, 2007 |  /s/              Ronald S. Saks                                                                                         |
|--------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                       | Ronald                S. SaksPresident                and Chief Executive Officer(Principal                Executive Officer) |

| Date:                November 8, 2007 |  /s/              Lawrence E. Dickinson                                                                                                                 |
|---------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                  | Lawrence                E. DickinsonSecretary                and Chief Financial Officer(Principal                Financial and Principal AccountingOfficer) |
****

**MOTOR MODEL: RF370/RK370**

# image1.jpeg

# image2.jpeg

# image3.jpeg

# image4.png

# image5.png
#### SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. ROBERT G. LASSITER AND COMPANY.

(Filed 26 April, 1933.)

Appeal by plaintiff and defendant from *Gowper, J.,*at June Special Term, 1932, of 'Wake.

Affirmed.

In 1923 the defendant made a contract with the Highway Commission to construct a section of the State Highway in Johnston County, and thereafter entered into two “average agreements” with the plaintiff, marked Exhibits 0 and D. These agreements are identical in terms, one applying to cars placed by the plaintiff for the defendant’s benefit at Clayton, the other to cars placed at Wilson’s Mills. The defendant agreed to comply with the terms and conditions of the National Car Demurrage Rules and Charges set forth in Exhibits A and B. In September, October, November, and December, 1923, the plaintiff placed at Clayton and Wilson’s Mills a number of cars consigned to the defendant, some of which, the plaintiff contends, were held by the defendant for unloading for a longer time than was allowed by the demurrage rules. Upon failure of the parties to agree upon a settlement the plaintiff brought suit against the defendant to recover $2,442, the amount alleged to be due for demurrage charges. Pleadings were filed and the cause was referred to a referee with instructions to hear the evidence and to report his findings of fact and his conclusions of law. The referee made a report, the court recommitted the cause, the referee heard additional evidence, and submitted his final report. The plaintiff and the defendant filed exceptions.

*Smith & Joyner and John H. Anderson, Jr., for plaintiff.*

*Parham & Lassiter for defendant.*

Per Cueiam.

The record is voluminous and the briefs are exhaustive. We have given the exceptions filed by both parties due consideration and have discovered no assignment of error which calls for special discussion. The trial court overruled all exceptions and objections to rulings, findings of fact, and conclusions of law except the 17, 25 and 26 findings of fact, and as to these sustained the defendant’s exceptions. The pertinent principles of law are familiar and the judgment of the court accords with previous decisions and should be affirmed. Judgment

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                      STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                        OF PREMIERE GLOBAL SERVICES, INC.
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    ss. 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In  connection  with  Amendment  No. 1 to the Annual Report of Premiere
Global  Services,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), the undersigned, Boland T. Jones, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company,  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


                                        /s/ Boland T. Jones
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Boland T. Jones
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        Premiere Global Services, Inc.
                                        April 30, 2007
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Microbiome and Metabolism Research Unit: Little Rock, AR
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Little Rock, Arkansas Microbiome and Metabolism Research Unit Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Research Projects Subjects of Investigation at this LocationEach ARS research project has related subjects of investigation.  Listed below are the subjects of investigation currently conducted at this location.
Clicking on a subject of investigation will list the research projects within that  subject of investigation.Subjects of Investigation
                            Individuals (as workers, consumers, members of society)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
EXHIBIT 32.2
                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO\
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly report of Online Vacation Center
Holdings Corp (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30,
2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Edward B. Rudner, Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:  November 13, 2006

/s/ Edward B. Rudner
--------------------
Edward B. Rudner
Principal Financial Officer
#### SAMUEL W. MORGAN v. W. L. SPEIGHT.

(Filed 21 September, 1955.)

Contracts § 26—

Allegations to the effect that plaintiff, owning a part of an island, granted •permission to the owner of the other part of the island to use a strip of plaintiff’s land for the purpose of depositing material dredged from the adjoining bay, which would greatly increase the value of plaintiff’s land, and that defendant, a stranger to the agreement, prevented the deposit of the dredged material on plaintiff’s land by threatening, without right, to restrain such operation, *is held,*insufficient to show that plaintiff had an enforceable contract, and demurrer was properly sustained.

Winborne and Higgins, JJ., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

*604Appeal by plaintiff from *Bone, J.,*at May Term 1955, of CeaveN.

*George B. Riddle, Jr., for Plaintiff Appellant.*

*Barden, Stith & McCotter for Defendant Appellee.*

PER Cukiam.

Plaintiff instituted this action to recover damages for wrongful interference with contract.

The material allegations of the complaint, briefly stated, were that plaintiff owned land on Radio Island, lying between Morehead City and Beaufort, in Carteret County; that Aviation Fuel Terminal, Inc., owned land on west side of said Island; that Aviation Fuel Terminal contracted with Bryan Construction Company to dredge a channel in waters adjoining its land; and that plaintiff gave permission to Aviation Fuel Terminal and the Construction Company to use a strip of his land for the purpose of depositing dredged material in a bay adjoining plaintiff's land, which would have greatly increased the value of his land. He further alleged that defendant, having no right to do so, advised the Construction Company if it proceeded to build up plaintiff’s land with dredged material he would sue to restrain the operation. In consequence the company changed its plans and deposited the material elsewhere.

Defendant demurred on the ground that the complaint failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, for that it appeared from the complaint that plaintiff had no enforceable contract.

The court sustained the demurrer, and in this ruling we concur.

Affirmed.

WiNBORNE and HiggiNS, JJ., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.