alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE v. MARVIN WILLIAMS

(Filed 27 November, 1957)

Appeal by defendant from *Olive, J.,*April 15, 1957, Criminal Term, Greensboro Division, of Guilford.

Defendant was indicted and tried for the felony defined in G.S. 14-177 as “the abominable and detestable crime against nature, with mankind or beast”; and, the jury having returned a verdict of guilty, judgment imposing a prison sentence was pronounced. Defendant excepted and appealed.

*273
      *Attorney-General Patton, Assistant Attorney-General Bruton and F. Kent Burns, member of staff, for the State.*

*J. V. Morgan for defendant appellant.*

Per Curiam.

G.S. 14-177 includes the particular act of perversion charged in the bill of indictment. *S. v. Griffin,*175 N.C. 767, 94 S.E. 678. Plenary evidence supports the charge. It would serve no needful purpose to discuss the unnatural and depraved conduct to which the evidence relates.

Each of defendant’s assignments of error has been carefully considered. None discloses error of law affording a sufficient basis for the award of a new trial.

No error.
| 1)   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:           November      4, 2008 |                                  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                                                                                         | /s/  William      L. Hodges |
|                                                                                         | William      L. Hodges                |
|                                                                                         | Chief      Financial Officer          |

----
#### C. C. WIMBISH v. A. C. HATTAWAY.

(Filed 17 April, 1929.)

Contracts B d — Time of expiration of option.

An option good “until” a day specified includes that day.

Civil aptioN, before *Shaw, J.,*at November Term, 1928, of Guil-fobd.

On 16 February, 1927, Glenn M. McCall and tbe defendant, A. C. Hattaway, entered into a written contract, providing in substance tbat *108McCall should sell to the defendant, Hattaway, a diamond ring for the sum of $962.50. Hattaway agreed to give to McCall an option to repurchase the above-mentioned ring for the sum of $1,000, said option “to hold good until the first day of October, 1927.” McCall, the holder of the option, duly transferred it to the plaintiff. On 1 October, 1927, Wimbish tendered to the defendant $1,000 and demanded the ring. The defendant refused to deliver the ring, contending that the option expired at midnight on 30 September, and that, therefore, the tender came too late.

Issues were submitted to the jury and were answered in favor of the plaintiff.

The verdict awarded to plaintiff damages in the sum of $400. Erom judgment upon verdict the defendant appealed.

*A. Q. Davis for plaintiff.*

*King, Sapp & King for defendant.*

Per Curiam.

The sole question of law presented is whether the words “until the 1st day of October, 1927,” include the first day of October.

The decisions in other jurisdictions are not in accord; but it has been expressly decided in this State that the word “until,” when used in reference to an act to be done on a day certain, includes the day specified. *Thomas v. Nichols,*127 N. C., 319, 37 S. E., 327.

Affirmed.
f8k062711ex10xii_suspect.htm


Exhibit 10.12




 


Exhibit B







Trade Names and Trade Marks








	
-  

	
Suspect Detection Systems







 



	
-  

	
SDS







 



	
-  

	
S.D.S.







 



	
-  

	
Cogito







 







 


It is noted that none are registered and that no representation shall be deemed to be given by way of this exhibit.
SNODGRASS
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS AND CONSULTANTS


[LOGO]


                         INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT'S REPORT
                         -------------------------------






Board of Directors
Nittany Financial Corp.

We  have  reviewed  the  accompanying  consolidated  balance  sheet  of  Nittany
Financial  Corp.  and  subsidiaries  as of  September  30, 2001, and the related
consolidated  statements  of income for the three and  nine-month  periods ended
September 30, 2001 and 2000,  the  consolidated  statement of cash flows for the
nine-month  period  ended  September  30,  2001 and 2000,  and the  consolidated
statement of changes in  stockholders'  equity for the  nine-month  period ended
September 30, 2001.  These financial  statements are the  responsibility  of the
Company's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute  of  Certified  Public  Accountants.  A review  of  interim  financial
information  consists  principally  of applying  analytical  and  procedures  to
financial  data and making  inquiries of persons  responsible  for financial and
accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in
accordance with auditing  standards  generally  accepted in the United States of
America,  the objective of which is the  expression of an opinion  regarding the
financial  statements taken as a whole.  Accordingly,  we do not express such an
opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material  modifications that should
be made to the  accompanying  financial  statements for them to be in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have  previously  audited,  in accordance with auditing  standards  generally
accepted in the United States of America,  the consolidated  balance sheet as of
December 31, 2000, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in
stockholders'  equity  and cash  flows for the year then  ended  (not  presented
herein);  and in our report dated  February 9, 2001 we expressed an  unqualified
opinion on those consolidated financial statements


/s/ S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.


Wexford, PA
November 11, 2001


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                  <C>
S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.
1000 Stonewood Drive, Suite 200 Wexford, PA 15090-8399 Phone: 724-934-0344 Facsimile: 724-934-0345

</TABLE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-11597

Procter & Gamble:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXHIBIT
32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Apria
Healthcare Group Inc. (the company or Apria) on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the SEC on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Amin I. Khalifa, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ AMIN I. KHALIFA Amin I. Khalifa
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerMarch 16, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Apria and will be retained by Apria and furnished to the Securities and Exhange Commission
or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code) (the Act), each of the undersigned, Floyd C. Wilson, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Mark J. Mize, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, of Petrohawk Energy Corporation, a
Delaware corporation (the Company), hereby certify that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                                                                
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | 
|Date: August 6, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/    Floyd C. Wilson                                         
|                     |  |  |  | Floyd C. Wilson                                                
|                     |  |  |  | Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive
Officer   
|                     |  | 
|Date: August 6, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/    Mark J. Mize                                            
|                     |  |  |  | Mark J. Mize                                                   
|                     |  |  |  | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer

This certification accompanies this Form 10-Q and shall not be deemed filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section.

A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to, and will be retained by, the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

April 12, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-1659

EQI, Ltd: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_04.15.19.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2024-1415

_____________________________

BRENDA GOSNEY and WILLIAM 

GOSNEY,

Petitioners,

v.

PHILLIP GRIFFITH and

KIMBERLEY GRIFFITH,

Respondents.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Prohibition—Original Jurisdiction.

August 13, 2024

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED.

LEWIS, B.L. THOMAS, and LONG, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Doreen Turner Inkeles and Randall Mark Shochet of Shochet Law 

Group, Trenton, for Petitioners.

Jennifer Kerkhoff, Law Offices of Jennifer Kerkhoff, P.A., 

Chiefland, for Respondents.
---

Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002




I, Maury
Austin, certify, that to my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
MIPS Technologies, Inc. for the quarter ended December 31, 2008 (the
“Form 10-Q”), to which
this certificate is an exhibit fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
and that information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MIPS
Technologies, Inc. for the three month period covered by the
Form 10-Q.




Date:
      February 6, 2009
            By:
            /s/ MAURY AUSTIN
              Maury
      Austin
              Vice President and Chief
      Financial Officer,
              MIPS Technologies,
      Inc












A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided by MIPS Technologies and will be retained by it and furnished to the
Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,236,909
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      5,036
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,335,062
<PP&E>                                         690,280
<DEPRECIATION>                               (368,427)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,679,585
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          286,741
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       166,359
<OTHER-SE>                                  20,649,563
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,679,585
<SALES>                                         62,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                62,000
<CGS>                                           10,945
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,974,947
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,493,897
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,407,486)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,375
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (7,410,861)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,410,861)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.57)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.57)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.20

 

GLENN C. CHRISTENSON

EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER

 

May 12, 2000

 

via hand delivery

 

Ms. Fern Price, Trust Officer

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.

300 South Fourth Street, Third Floor

Las Vegas, Nevada  89101

 

Re:                               Ground Lease dated June 1, 1995, as amended (the “Lease”), between TGH&H Real Estate Trust, as successor landlord (“Landlord”), and Texas Station, Inc., as successor tenant (“Tenant”).

 

Dear Ms. Price:

 

This letter agreement will confirm that, pursuant to Section I.C.2 of the Lease, Landlord and Tenant have agreed that (a) the annual Rent (as defined in the Lease) for the first Rental Period (as defined in the Lease) shall be $3,450,000 per year, subject to adjustment pursuant to subsection (b) of that Section, and (b) the first Rental Period shall commence on August 1, 2000.  Except as expressly modified hereby, the Lease remains in full force and effect.

 

If the foregoing accurately sets forth Landlord’s agreement with respect to these matters, please so indicate by executing the attached copy of this letter in the space provided below and returning it to me as soon as possible.

 

 

	
 
    	
 
    	
Sincerely,
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
TEXAS STATION, INC.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
By:
    	
/S/    GLENN C. CHRISTENSON
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
Glenn   C. Christenson
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
Senior   Vice President
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
Treasurer
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
AGREED   to and ACCEPTED this              day of May, 2000
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
TGH&H REAL ESTATE TRUST
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
Bank   of America, N.A., as Trustee of the TGH&H Real Estate Trust under Trust   Agreement dated January 8, 1997
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Name:
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Title:
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
bcc:
    	
Frank   J. Fertitta, III
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Blake   L. Sartini
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Scott   M Nielson
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
William   W. Warner
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Richard   J. Haskins
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
John   Hertig
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-11464

Trio Engineered Products:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel