8096 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 17, 2016 / Notices 

of protecting our public trust resources 

for the benefit of all. The information 

collected serves as a tool for 

enforcement of the depredation orders 

and contributes to our knowledge of the 

impacts of the depredation orders on 

double-crested cormorants. Because of 

the risk of enforcement, we believe 

those operating under these orders have 

reason to collect and report reliable 

data. We agree that the control program 

would benefit from a systematic 

evaluation. This evaluation will be 

conducted as resources allow. We did 

not make any changes to our 

requirements at this time. 

Request for Public Comments 

We again invite comments concerning 

this information collection on: 

• Whether or not the collection of 

information is necessary, including 

whether or not the information will 

have practical utility; 

• The accuracy of our estimate of the 

burden for this collection of 

information; 

• Ways to enhance the quality, utility, 

and clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

• Ways to minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on 

respondents. 

Comments that you submit in 

response to this notice are a matter of 

public record. Before including your 

address, phone number, email address, 

or other personal identifying 

information in your comment, you 

should be aware that your entire 

comment, including your personal 

identifying information, may be made 

publicly available at any time. While 

you can ask OMB and us in your 

comment to withhold your personal 

identifying information from public 

review, we cannot guarantee that it will 

be done. 

Dated: February 11, 2016. 

Tina A. Campbell, 

Chief, Division of Policy, Performance, and 

Management Programs, U.S. Fish and Wildlife 

Service. 

[FR Doc. 2016–03200 Filed 2–16–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4333–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Bureau of Land Management 

[LLCOS00000 L10100000.BN0000 16X] 

Notice of Public Meeting, Southwest 

Resource Advisory Council 

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Notice of public meeting. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the 

Federal Land Policy and Management 

Act and the Federal Advisory 

Committee Act of 1972, the U.S. 

Department of the Interior, Bureau of 

Land Management (BLM) Southwest 

Resource Advisory Council (RAC) is 

scheduled to meet as indicated below. 

DATES: The Southwest RAC meeting will 

be held on March 18, 2016, in Ridgway, 

Colorado. 

ADDRESSES: The Southwest RAC 

meeting will be held March 18 at the 

Ouray County Fairgrounds Building, 

22739 Highway 550, Ridgway, CO 

81432. The meeting will begin at 9:30 

a.m. and adjourn at approximately 4 

p.m. A public comment period 

regarding matters on the agenda will be 

held at 2 p.m. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Shannon Borders, Public Affairs 

Specialist, 970–240–5300; 2505 S. 

Townsend Ave., Montrose, CO 81401. 

Persons who use a telecommunications 

device for the deaf (TDD) may call the 

Federal Information Relay Service 

(FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339 to contact the 

above individual during normal 

business hours. The FIRS is available 24 

hours a day, seven days a week, to leave 

a message or question with the above 

individual. You will receive a reply 

during normal business hours. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Southwest RAC advises the Secretary of 

the Interior, through the BLM, on a 

variety of public land issues in 

Colorado. Topics of discussion for all 

Southwest RAC meetings may include 

field manager and working group 

reports, recreation, fire management, 

land use planning, invasive species 

management, energy and minerals 

management, travel management, 

wilderness, land exchange proposals, 

cultural resource management and other 

issues as appropriate. These meetings 

are open to the public. The public may 

present written comments to the RACs. 

Each formal RAC meeting will also have 

time, as identified above, allocated for 

hearing public comments. Depending on 

the number of people wishing to 

comment and time available, the time 

for individual oral comments may be 

limited. 

Brian St. George, 

Acting BLM Colorado State Director. 

[FR Doc. 2016–03294 Filed 2–16–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–JB–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–928 and 

Investigation No. 337–TA–937] 

(Consolidated) (Remand) Certain 

Windshield Wipers and Components 

Thereof; Commission Determination 

Not To Review Two Initial 

Determinations; Schedule for Filing 

Written Submissions on Remedy, the 

Public Interest, and Bonding; 

Extension of the Target Date for 

Completion of the Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review (1) an initial determination 

(‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 43) of the presiding 

administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) 

granting complainants’ motion to 

terminate the remand investigation with 

respect to certain products and (2) a 

remand ID. The Commission has set a 

schedule for filing written submissions 

on remedy, the public interest, and 

bonding. The Commission has also 

determined to extend the target date for 

completion of this investigation to April 

12, 2016. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

205–3115. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http://

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted investigation No. 

337–TA–928, Certain Windshield 

Wipers and Components Thereof, under 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (‘‘Section 

337’’), on September 2, 2014, based on 

a complaint filed by Valeo North 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 17, 2016 / Notices 8097 

America, Inc. of Troy, MI, and Delmex 

de Juarez S. de R.L. de C.V. of Mexico 

(collectively, ‘‘Valeo’’). The complaint 

alleges a violation of section 337 by 

reason of infringement of certain claims 

of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,891,044 (‘‘the ‘044 

patent’’); 7,937,798 (‘‘the ‘798 patent’’); 

and 8,220,106 by Federal-Mogul Corp. 

of Southfield, Michigan, Federal-Mogul 

Vehicle Component Solutions, Inc. of 

Southfield, Michigan, and FederalMogul S.A. of Aubange, Belgium 

(collectively, ‘‘Federal-Mogul’’). 79 FR 

52041–42 (Sep. 2, 2014). 

On November 21, 2014, the 

Commission instituted a Section 337 

investigation No. 337–TA–937, Certain 

Windshield Wipers and Components 

Thereof, based on a complaint filed by 

Valeo. The complaint alleges a violation 

of section 337 by reason of infringement 

of certain claims of the ‘044 patent and 

the ‘798 patent by Trico Products 

Corporation of Rochester Hills, 

Michigan, Trico Products of 

Brownsville, Texas, and Trico 

Componentes SA de CV of Tamaulipas, 

Mexico (collectively, ‘‘Trico’’). 79 FR 

69525–26 (Nov. 21, 2014). 

On December 9, 2014, the ALJ 

consolidated investigations 337–TA– 

928 and 337–TA–937. See ALJ Order 

No. 8 in the investigation 337–TA–928. 

The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations does not participate as a 

party in these consolidated 

investigations. 

The evidentiary hearing on the 

question of violation of section 337 was 

held in July of 2015. On October 22, 

2015, the ALJ issued his final ID finding 

a violation of section 337 with respect 

to certain claims of the ‘798 patent. 

On December 21, 2015, the 

Commission issued a notice 

(‘‘Commission Notice’’) in which the 

Commission determined as follows: 

(1) To review the ALJ’s determination in 

Order No. 36 (Jul. 16, 2015) precluding 

arguments and evidence relating to Trico’s 

618 and 596 connectors on the basis that they 

are obsolete and are irrelevant to the present 

investigation, see ALJ Order No. 36 at 1, and 

on review, to reverse this determination and 

to remand the investigation to the ALJ with 

respect to this issue, to make findings 

regarding whether Trico products with 618 

and 596 connectors infringe either asserted 

patent and to make any necessary related 

findings, as set forth in the accompanying 

Remand Order. 

(2) To review the ALJ’s finding that Valeo’s 

indirect infringement claims are moot and, 

on review, to vacate it. The Commission 

finds it unnecessary to reach the issue of 

whether Trico induced infringement of the 

‘798 patent with respect to the accused 

products considered by the ALJ because the 

Commission has determined not to review 

the ALJ’s finding that Trico directly infringes 

the ‘798 patent. 

(3) To review the ALJ’s finding that Valeo 

established quantitatively and qualitatively 

significant investment in plant and 

equipment and thus satisfies economic prong 

of the domestic industry requirement under 

subsection (A) of section 337(a)(3) and, on 

review, to take no position with respect to 

this finding. 

(4) To review the final ID with respect to 

footnote 7 on page 17 and, on review, to 

modify the subject footnote by striking its 

second sentence. 

Commission Notice at 2–3. The 

Commission determined not to review 

the remainder of the final ID. 

On January 7, 2016, complainants 

Valeo moved to terminate the Remand 

Investigation with respect to Trico’s 

products with 618 and 596 connectors. 

In its motion, Valeo states that it has 

withdrawn its assertion of infringement 

of the asserted patents against such 

products. On January 11, 2016, the ALJ 

issued an ID (Order No. 43) granting 

Valeo’s unopposed motion. 

On the same day, the ALJ issued a 

Remand ID. The ALJ stated that in view 

of Order No. 43 granting Complainants’ 

motion to terminate the Remand 

Investigation with respect to Trico’s 

products with the 618 and 596 

connectors, the Commission’s Remand 

Order dated December 21, 2015, 

directing the ALJ to: (1) Make findings 

regarding whether Trico products with 

618 and 596 connectors infringe the 

Asserted Patents; and (2) issue an ID 

within 30 days of the Remand Order 

extending the target date, is moot. 

Remand ID at 1. No party petitioned for 

review of any of the subject IDs, and the 

Commission has determined not to 

review them. The Commission’s 

determination results in a finding of 

violation as to the ’798 patent. The 

Commission has determined to extend 

the target date for completion of this 

investigation to April 12, 2016. 

In connection with the final 

disposition of this investigation, the 

Commission may (1) issue an order that 

could result in the exclusion of the 

subject articles from entry into the 

United States, and/or (2) issue one or 

more cease and desist orders that could 

result in the respondent being required 

to cease and desist from engaging in 

unfair acts in the importation and sale 

of such articles. Accordingly, the 

Commission is interested in receiving 

written submissions that address the 

form of remedy, if any, that should be 

ordered. If a party seeks exclusion of an 

article from entry into the United States 

for purposes other than entry for 

consumption, the party should so 

indicate and provide information 

establishing that activities involving 

other types of entry either are adversely 

affecting it or are likely to do so. For 

background, see In the Matter of Certain 

Devices for Connecting Computers via 

Telephone Lines, Inv. No. 337–TA–360, 

USITC Pub. No. 2843 (Dec. 1994) 

(Commission Opinion). 

If the Commission contemplates some 

form of remedy, it must consider the 

effects of that remedy upon the public 

interest. The factors the Commission 

will consider include the effect that an 

exclusion order and/or cease and desist 

orders would have on (1) the public 

health and welfare, (2) competitive 

conditions in the U.S. economy, (3) U.S. 

production of articles that are like or 

directly competitive with those that are 

subject to investigation, and (4) U.S. 

consumers. The Commission is 

therefore interested in receiving written 

submissions that address the 

aforementioned public interest factors 

in the context of this investigation. 

If the Commission orders some form 

of remedy, the President has 60 days to 

approve or disapprove the 

Commission’s action. During this 

period, the subject articles would be 

entitled to enter the United States under 

bond, in an amount determined by the 

Commission and prescribed by the 

Secretary of the Treasury. The 

Commission is therefore interested in 

receiving submissions concerning the 

amount of the bond that should be 

imposed. 

Written Submissions: The parties to 

the investigation are requested to file 

written submissions on the issues under 

review. The submissions should be 

concise and thoroughly referenced to 

the record in this investigation. Parties 

to the investigation, interested 

government agencies, and any other 

interested parties are encouraged to file 

written submissions on the issues of 

remedy, the public interest, and 

bonding. Such submissions should 

address the recommended 

determination on remedy and bonding 

issued on October 22, 2015, by the ALJ. 

Complainants are also requested to 

submit proposed remedial orders for the 

Commission’s consideration. 

Complainants are further requested to 

provide the expiration date of the ’798 

patent and state the HTSUS numbers 

under which the accused articles are 

imported. The written submissions and 

proposed remedial orders must be filed 

no later than the close of business on 

February 24, 2016. Reply submissions 

must be filed no later than the close of 

business on March 2, 2016. No further 

submissions on these issues will be 

permitted unless otherwise ordered by 

the Commission. 

Persons filing written submissions 

must file the original document 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
8098 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 17, 2016 / Notices 

electronically on or before the deadlines 

stated above and submit 8 true paper 

copies to the Office of the Secretary by 

noon the next day pursuant to section 

210.4(f) of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 

210.4(f)). Submissions should refer to 

the investigation number (‘‘Inv. No. 

337–TA–928/937’’) in a prominent place 

on the cover page and/or the first page. 

(See Handbook for Electronic Filing 

Procedures, http://www.usitc.gov/

secretary/fed_reg_notices/rules/

handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf). 

Persons with questions regarding filing 

should contact the Secretary (202–205– 

2000). 

Any person desiring to submit a 

document to the Commission in 

confidence must request confidential 

treatment. All such requests should be 

directed to the Secretary to the 

Commission and must include a full 

statement of the reasons why the 

Commission should grant such 

treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents 

for which confidential treatment by the 

Commission is properly sought will be 

treated accordingly. A redacted nonconfidential version of the document 

must also be filed simultaneously with 

any confidential filing. All nonconfidential written submissions will be 

available for public inspection at the 

Office of the Secretary and on EDIS. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 

210 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 

210). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: February 10, 2016. 

Lisa R. Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2016–03205 Filed 2–16–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms 

and Explosives 

[OMB Number 1140–0073] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Proposed eCollection 

eComments Requested; Furnishing of 

Samples 

AGENCY: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, 

Firearms and Explosives, Department of 

Justice. 

ACTION: 30-Day notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Justice 

(DOJ), Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, 

Firearms and Explosives (ATF), will 

submit the following information 

collection request to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and approval in accordance with 

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

The proposed information collection 

was previously published in the Federal 

Register 80 FR 77377, on December14, 

2015, allowing for a 60-day comment 

period. 

DATES: Comments are encouraged and 

will be accepted for an additional 30 

days until March 18, 2016. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have additional comments 

especially on the estimated public 

burden or associated response time, 

suggestions, or need a copy of the 

proposed information collection 

instrument with instructions or 

additional information, please contact 

Anita Scheddel, Program Analyst, 

Explosives Industry Programs Branch, 

99 New York Ave. NE., Washington, DC 

20226 at email: Anita.Scheddel@atf.gov. 

Written comments and/or suggestions 

can also be directed to the Office of 

Management and Budget, Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs, 

Attention Department of Justice Desk 

Officer, Washington, DC 20503 or sent 

to OIRA_submissions@omb.eop.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written 

comments and suggestions from the 

public and affected agencies concerning 

the proposed collection of information 

are encouraged. Your comments should 

address one or more of the following 

four points: 

• Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

• Evaluate the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

• Evaluate whether and if so how the 

quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information to be collected can be 

enhanced; and 

• Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including through the 

use of appropriate automated, 

electronic, mechanical, or other 

technological collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology, 

e.g., permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Overview of This Information 

Collection 

1. Type of Information Collection: 

Extension of a currently approved 

collection. 

2. The Title of the Form/Collection: 

Furnishing of Samples. 

3. The agency form number, if any, 

and the applicable component of the 

Department sponsoring the collection: 

Form number: None. 

Component: Bureau of Alcohol, 

Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, U.S. 

Department of Justice. 

4. Affected public who will be asked 

or required to respond, as well as a brief 

abstract: 

Primary: Business or other for-profit. 

Other: None. 

Abstract: ATF requires licensed 

manufacturers and importers and 

persons who manufacture or import 

explosives materials or ammonium 

nitrate to submit samples at the request 

of the Director. 

5. An estimate of the total number of 

respondents and the amount of time 

estimated for an average respondent to 

respond: An estimated 2,350 

respondents will take 30 minutes to 

complete the questionnaire. 

6. An estimate of the total public 

burden (in hours) associated with the 

collection: The estimated annual public 

burden associated with this collection is 

1, 175 hours. 

If additional information is required 

contact: Jerri Murray, Department 

Clearance Officer, United States 

Department of Justice, Justice 

Management Division, Policy and 

Planning Staff, Two Constitution 

Square, 145 N Street NE., Room 3E– 

405B, Washington, DC 20530. 

Dated: February 11, 2016. 

Jerri Murray, 

Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S. 

Department of Justice. 

[FR Doc. 2016–03186 Filed 2–16–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–FY–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Proposed 

Consent Decree Under the Clean Water 

Act 

On February 9, 2016, the Department 

of Justice lodged a proposed Consent 

Decree with the United States District 

Court for the District of Montana, 

Missoula Division, in a lawsuit entitled 

United States v. Michael’s Convenience 

Stores, Inc., Civil Action No. 9:16–cv– 

00020–DWM. 

In its Complaint in this civil action, 

the United States alleges that Michael’s 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES