alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In re Custody of JAMES LESLIE ALBERTSON.

(Filed 28 January, 1935.)

Appeal from *Glemení, J.,*by Grace H. Albertson, at March Term, 1934, of Guilford.

Affirmed.

*Thomas Turner, Jr., for petitioner Grace E. Albertson.*

*T. W. Albertson and Walser & Casey for respondent W. E. Albertson.*

ClaricsoN, J.

This proceeding concerns a writ of *habeas corpus*instituted by Grace H. Albertson for the custody of James Leslie Albert-son, infant son, about 8 years of age, of Grace H. and *W.*H. Albertson. The matter bas heretofore been before this Court. *In re Albertson,*205 N. C., 742.

The brief of petitioner appellant says: “The appellant concedes that if the judgment of the High Point municipal court is a valid judgment, the petitioner must seek her remedy by a motion in the cause in the municipal court of the city of High Point, *In re Blake,*184 N. C., 278. But if the said judgment is a void judgment, it can have no effect whatsoever upon the petitioner’s rights, and *habeas corpus*will lie to determine the custody of the child.” See *In re Albertson, supra.*This proceeding is governed by the action of *Grace Hulin Albertson v.*W. *H. Albertson, ante,*547.

The judgment of the court below is

Affirmed.

Staot, C. J., dissents.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3502

JLG Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2647

Reelcraft Industries:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 29 (Friday, February 12, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 7595]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02835]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Notice of Permits Issued Under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 
1978

AGENCY: National Science Foundation.

ACTION: Notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation of 
1978, Public Law 95-541.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Science Foundation (NSF) is required to publish 
notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. 
This is the required notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nature McGinn, ACA Permit Officer, 
Division of Polar Programs, Rm. 755, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. Or by email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d4959795a4b1a6b9bda0a794baa7b2fab3bba2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8dccceccfde8ffe0e4f9fecde3feeba3eae2fb">[email protected]</span></a>

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On January 7 & 8, 2016 the National Science 
Foundation published notices in the Federal Register of a permit 
application received. The permits were issued on February 8, 2016 to:

1. Ari S. Friedlaender Permit No. 2016-024
2. Michael Gooseff Permit No. 2016-018

Nadene G. Kennedy,
Polar Coordination Specialist, Division of Polar Programs.
[FR Doc. 2016-02835 Filed 2-11-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Ex-99.3 a)

                         LIBERTY LENDING SERVICES, INC.
                             OFFICER' S CERTIFICATE
                        ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

This serves as Liberty Lending Services, Inc. Officer's Certificate/Annual
Statement as to Compliance for the servicing of loans under the Bear Stearns
(SAMI) Structured Asset Mortgage Investments Trust, Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates, Series 1998-10, Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated November 1,
1998 and Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement dated November 19, 1998 with your
concern.

1.       A review of the activities during the proceeding fiscal year and of the
         performance with the requirements of the Agreement has been made under
         the Officer's supervision.

2.       To the best of the Officers' knowledge, based on the above review,
         Liberty Lending Services, Inc. has fulfilled all its obligations under
         the Agreement throughout the fiscal year.

3.       Real estate taxes have been paid as required by the terms of the
         mortgage.

4.       Mortgage insurance premiums due under the contract of insurance with
         FHA or PMI carriers have been paid as required.


<PAGE>

5.       Insurance is being maintained, is fully paid, and complies with the
         Agreement. Adequate hazard insurance is in force on all loans as
         required under this Agreement. Flood insurance coverage, if required,
         is in force. If escrowed, insurance/PMI premiums and taxes/assessment
         monies have been analyzed, in accordance with RESPA, to ensure
         sufficient funds are being collected in escrow for the current year.

6.       Property inspections have been performed as stated in the Agreement,
         unless otherwise amended.

7.       Appropriate IRS notices were performed in accordance with IRS
         Regulations.

8.       Disbursements from Trust Account funds were made for proper purposes,
         and all payments required to be made by the Agreement have been made.

9.       Proper fidelity coverage and errors and omissions insurance are in
         force as required.

10.      Loans with variable rate features have been changed in accordance with
         terms of the note.

Liberty Lending Services, Inc. is authorized by applicable law to service the
mortgages, and it has and will continue to satisfy all licensing, registration,
and other requirements of the Agreement. There is, as of this date, no default
in the fulfillment of any of its obligations under the Agreement known to this
Officer. As an Officer of Liberty Lending Services, Inc., individually, I
certify to the best of my knowledge, that the foregoing statements are true and
correct.

                                                   Date: February 12, 2002

/s/ Barbara R. Bowser
-----------------------------
Barbara R. Bowser
Assistant Vice President
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4240 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4240

 To amend section 2441 of title 18, United States Code, to broaden the 
      scope of individuals subject to prosecution for war crimes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 May 18 (legislative day, May 17), 2022

   Mr. Grassley (for himself, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Graham, and Mr. Leahy) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend section 2441 of title 18, United States Code, to broaden the 
      scope of individuals subject to prosecution for war crimes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Justice for Victims of War Crimes 
Act''.

SEC. 2. WAR CRIMES.

    Section 2441 of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (b) and inserting the following:
    ``(b) Jurisdiction.--There is jurisdiction over an offense 
described in subsection (a) if--
            ``(1) the offense occurs in whole or in part within the 
        United States; or
            ``(2) regardless of where the offense occurs--
                    ``(A) the victim or offender is--
                            ``(i) a national of the United States or an 
                        alien lawfully admitted for permanent 
                        residence; or
                            ``(ii) a member of the Armed Forces of the 
                        United States, regardless of nationality; or
                    ``(B) the offender is present in the United States, 
                regardless of the nationality of the victim or 
                offender.''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(e) Nonapplicability of Certain Limitations.--In the case of an 
offense described in subsection (a), an indictment may be found or an 
information may be instituted at any time without limitation.
    ``(f) Certification Requirement.--No prosecution for an offense 
described in subsection (a) shall be undertaken by the United States 
except on written certification of the Attorney General or a designee 
that a prosecution by the United States is in the public interest and 
necessary to secure substantial justice.''.
                                 <all>
```
exv10w18






Exhibit 10.18




Amendment

To

Employment Agreement




WHEREAS, an Employment Agreement effective as of the 12th day of August, 2009 as amended
effective April 1, 2011 (the “Agreement”) was entered into by and between Arcadia Resources, Inc.,
a Nevada corporation (“Employer”) and Marvin R. Richardson (“Executive”); and



WHEREAS, the Agreement may be amended or modified by written agreement executed by the parties
or their respective successors and legal representatives; and



WHEREAS, the parties now believe it is mutually beneficial to amend a certian provision of the
Agreement through this Amendment (“Amendment”) to reflect an extension of a temporary reduction in
the Executive’s annual base salary.



NOW THEREFORE, Employer and Executive hereby agree, effective as of April 1, 2011, to amend
the Agreement as follows:



1. Subsection (a) of Section 3 (Compensation) of the Agreement is amended hereby to read in its
entirety as follows:




(a) Base Salary. During the Employment Period, the Executive shall receive an annual Base Salary of
$250,000 payable in accordance with the regular payroll practices of Employer. The Executive’s
base salary shall be reviewed annually by Employer, in accordance with Employer’s standard
practices for executives generally, and may be increased, but not decreased, as determined by the
Board of Directors, in their sole discretion, or by any committee of the Board of Directors to
which such authority has been delegated. The parties acknowledge that as an accommodation to the
Employer, Executive agreed effective April 1, 2009, and further agreed effective April 1, 2010 and
April 1, 2011, to temporarily receive a ten percent (10%) reduction in his Base Salary (the
“Reduced Base”). The amount of Executive’s Reduced Base salary is presently $225,000 annually and
shall remain in effect until the Base Salary is restored by the Board of Directors. All severance
payments due to Executive under this Agreement shall be calculated based on Executive’s Base
Salary, not Executive’s Reduced Base.



 


 









 








IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive has hereunto set the Executive’s hand and, pursuant to the
authorization of the Board of Directors, Employer has caused this Amendment to be executed in its
name and on its behalf, all as of the day and year first written above following the preamble.



	 	 	 	 	 

	ARCADIA RESOURCES, INC.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Matthew Middendorf
 

Matthew Middendorf
	 	 
	 

	 	Title: Chief Financial Officer	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	EXECUTIVE	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Marvin R. Richardson	 	 
	 	 	 
	Marvin R. Richardson
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 6575** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. ABDULLAH RASOOL SHAKOOR , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Wilmington
. Terrence W. Boyle , District Judge. ( 7:97

- cr - 00064

- BO

- 1 ; 7:07

- cv - 00069

- BO )

Submitted : July 17, 2013 Decided: July 18, 2013

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Abdullah Rasool Shakoor , Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May

- Parker , Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh , North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding pre cedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Abdullah Rasool Shakoor seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration * of the court’s order dismissi ng his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2013) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a ce rtificate of appealability. 28 U. S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006)
. A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253( c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion
sta tes a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85.

* We no te that the motion was a Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion to reconsider , not a second or successive § 2255 motion. Gonzalez v. Crosby , 545 U.S. 524 , 530

- 32 (2005); United States v. Winestock , 340 F.3d 200 , 206

- 08 (4th Cir. 2003).3 We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Shakoor has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Shakoor’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from balance
sheets and statements of operations and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999             MAR-28-1998
<CASH>                                             253                  23,330
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   85,457                  23,081
<ALLOWANCES>                                       717                     234
<INVENTORY>                                     77,863                  24,851
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               195,533                  84,538
<PP&E>                                         172,770                  47,041
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,617                   2,010
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,462,565                 869,551
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          272,395                  64,374
<BONDS>                                        732,196                 202,377
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                 217,335
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           670                     291
<OTHER-SE>                                     579,932                (63,597)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,462,565                 869,551
<SALES>                                        254,264                  89,385
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               254,264                  89,385
<CGS>                                          104,703                  37,734
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  104,703                  37,734
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               112,968                  32,826
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   147                      94
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,030                  13,178
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    699                (63,316)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       217                   (360)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                482                (62,956)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                 (1,876)
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                       482                (64,832)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.01                  (2.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01                  (2.23)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TECHNISOURCE,
INC.'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          15,874,677
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,021,767
<ALLOWANCES>                                       358,933
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                38,192,045
<PP&E>                                           4,536,253
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,793,117
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  41,371,815
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,679,623
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           103,850
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,064,664
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    41,371,815
<SALES>                                         36,229,948
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,425,025
<CGS>                                           27,326,167
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,326,167
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,749,475
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,349,383
<INCOME-TAX>                                       539,753
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                809,630
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       809,630
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.08



</TABLE>