12816 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 8, 1995 / Notices

9 aircraft would be a last minute

replacement for its DASH–7

equipment. Hawaiian Airlines has

confirmed that this exemption is no

longer necessary; therefore, this

current exemption documents the

termination of the original exemption.

Termination, February 8, 1995,

Exemption No. 3796A

Docket No.: 23980

Petitioner: United States Hang Gliding

Association, Inc.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

103.1

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To amend Exemption No.

4144, as amended, which allows

unpowered ultralight vehicles to be

towed aloft by powered ultralight

vehicles operated by individuals

authorized by the United States Hang

Gliding Association, Inc. The

amendment would have allowed an

increase to the weight limit for singleplace powered ultralight vehicles,

used in air-to-air towing operations

only, up to 360 pounds empty weight.

Additionally, this petition would

have allowed an increase to the

weight limit for two-place powered

ultralight vehicles, used in air-to-air

towing operations only, up to 496

pounds empty weight. Exemption No.

4144, as amended, stand as is; the

amendment is denied. Denied,

February 10, 1995, Exemption No.

6024

Docket No.: 26067

Petitioner: SimuFlite Training

International

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

appendix H of part 121; 135.293;

135.297; 135.299; 135.303;

135.337(a)(2), (a)(3), and (b)(2); and

135.339(a)(2), (b), and (c)

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To extend and amend

Exemption No. 5187B, which permits

SimuFlite, subject to certain

conditions and limitations, to use its

qualified instructor pilots or pilot

check airmen in approved simulators

to train and check the pilots of part

135 certificate holders that contract

with SimuFlite for training. The

amendment restores the conditions

and limitations that existed prior to

the issuance of Exemption No. 5187B,

except for some minor clarifications.

Grant, February 2, 1995, Exemption

No. 5187C

Docket No.: 26302

Petitioner: FlightSafety International

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

appendix H of part 121; 135.293;

135.297; 135.299; 135.337(a)(2), (a)(3),

and (b)(2); and 135.339(a)(2), (b), and

(c)

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To extend and amend

Exemption No. 5241D, which permits

FlightSafety International (FSI),

subject to certain conditions and

limitations, to use its qualified

instructor pilots or pilot check airmen

in approved simulators to train and

check the pilots of part 135 certificate

holders that contract with FSI for

training. The amendment restores the

conditions and limitations that

existed prior to the issuance of

Exemption No. 5241D, except for

some minor clarifications. Grant,

February 1, 1995, Exemption No.

5241E

Docket No.: 27121

Petitioner: Tower Air

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

appendix H of part 121

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To extend and amend

Exemption No. 5596, as amended,

which allows Tower Air to provide

initial or upgrade training and

checking in a Phase II (Level C)

simulator and allows certain

experienced pilots and flight

engineers who have received training

in a Phase II (Level C) simulator to be

B747 seconds in command (SIC) in

accordance with the training and

checking provisions permitted under

Phase III (Level D) of appendix H. The

amendment revises the exemption to

permit former military pilots with

large turbojet experience to be trained

and checked in a B747 Phase II (Level

C) simulator without receiving any

training or checking in the actual

aircraft. Grant, February 3, 1995,

Exemption No. 5596C

Docket No.: 27947

Petitioner: Jet Support Systems, Inc.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

135.165(b)(6) and (7)

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To allow Jet Support

Systems, Inc., to operate turbojet

aircraft in extended overwater

operations equipped with one high

frequency communication system.

Grant, February 8, 1995, Exemption

No. 6026

Docket No.: 27968

Petitioner: Corporate Air

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

121.345(c)(2) and 135.143(c)(2)

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit Corporate Air

to operate without a TSO–C112 (Mode

S) transponder installed on its aircraft

operating under the provision of parts

121 and 135. Grant, February 7, 1995,

Exemption No. 6025

Docket No.: 27960

Petitioner: Atlas Air Inc.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

appendix H of part 121

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To extend and amend

Exemption No. 5888, which allows

Atlas Air Inc., to provide initial or

upgrade training and checking in a

Phase II (Level C) simulator and

allows certain experienced pilots and

flight engineers who have received

training in a Phase II (Level C)

simulator to be B–747 seconds in

command (SIC) in accordance with

the training and checking provisions

permitted under Phase III (Level D) of

appendix H. The amendment revises

paragraph 4.a of the conditions and

limitations to require two manual

takeoffs and landings instead of the

four manual takeoffs and landings

currently required. Partial Grant,

February 3, 1995, Exemption No.

5888A

Docket No.: 28058

Petitioner: Blackhawk International

Airways

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

135.143(c)(2)

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit Blackhawk

International Airways to operate

without a TSO–C112 (Mode S)

transponder installed on its aircraft

operating under the provisions of part

135. Grant, February 3, 1995,

Exemption No. 6022

Docket No.: 27859

Petitioner: Professional Airline

Training, Inc.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

61.55(b)(2); 61.56(c)(1); 61.57(c) and

(d); 61.58(c)(1) and (d); 61.63(c)(2)

and (d)(2) and (3); 61.65(c), (e)(2) and

(3), and (g); 61.67(d)(2); 61.157(d)(1)

and (2) and (e)(1) and (2); 61.191(c);

and appendix A of part 61

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit Professional

Airline Training, Inc., to use FAAapproved simulators to meet certain

flight experience requirements of part

61 of the FAR. Grant, February 3,

1995, Exemption No. 5988

[FR Doc. 95–5637 Filed 3–7–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

Notice of Intent To Rule on Application

To Use the Revenues From a

Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) at

Albany County Airport, Albany, NY

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Correction to notice of intent to

rule on application to use the revenues

from a passenger facility charge (PFC) at
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 8, 1995 / Notices 12817

Albany County Airport, Albany, New

York.

SUMMARY: This correction incorporates

information from the public agency’s

application which were omitted from

the previously published notice.

In notice document 95–4211

beginning on Page 9717 in the issue of

Tuesday, February 21, 1995, on the

second column, the last paragraph

should read as follows:

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA

proposes to rule and invites public

comment on the application to use the

revenues from a PFC at Albany County

Airport under the provisions of the

Aviation Safety and Capacity Expansion

Act of 1990 (Title IX of the Omnibus

Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990)

(Public Law 101–508) and Part 158 of

the Federal Aviation Regulations (14

CFR part 158).

On December 22, 1994, the FAA

determined that the application to use

the revenues from a PFC submitted by

the County of Albany was substantially

complete within the requirements of

Section 158.25 of Part 158. The FAA

will approve or disapprove the

application, in whole or in part, no later

than March 22, 1995.

The following is a brief overview of

the application.

Level of the proposed PFC: $3.00.

Proposed charge effective date: March

1, 1994.

Proposed charge expiration date:

April 1, 2005.

Total estimated PFC revenue:

$40,726,364.

Brief description of proposed projects:

—Terminal Building Renovation

—Runway and Taxiway Improvements

—Flood Management Improvements

—Air Traffic Control Tower

—Environmental Remediation

—New Interior Roadways

—Airport Studies

—Airport Equipment

Class or classes of air carriers which

the public agency has requested not be

required to collect PFCs: Air Taxi/

Commercial Operators (ATCO) filing

FAA Form 1800–31.

Any person may inspect the

application in person at the FAA office

listed above under FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT and at the FAA

Regional Airports office located at

Fitzgerald Federal Building, John F.

Kennedy International Airport, Jamaica,

New York 11430.

In addition, any person may, upon

request, inspect the application, notice

and other documents germane to the

application in person at the Albany

County Airport.

Issued in Jamaica, New York on February

28, 1995.

Anthony P. Spera,

Acting Manager, Airports Division.

[FR Doc. 95–5640 Filed 3–7–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

Notice of Intent To Rule on Application

To Use the Revenue From a Passenger

Facility Charge (PFC) at Capital

Airport; Springfield, IL

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of intent to rule on

application.

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to rule and

invites public comment on the

application to use the revenue from a

PFC at Capital Airport under the

provisions of the Aviation Safety and

Capacity Expansion Act of 1990 (Title

IX of the Omnibus Budget

Reconciliation Act of 1990) (Public Law

101–508) and Part 158 of the Federal

Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 158).

DATES: Comments must be received on

or before April 7, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this

application may be mailed or delivered

in triplicate to the FAA at the following

address: Federal Aviation

Administration, Chicago Airports

District Office, 2300 East Devon Ave.,

Room 258, Des Plaines, Illinois 60018.

In addition, one copy of any

comments submitted to the FAA must

be mailed or delivered to Mr. Robert W.

O’Brien, Jr., Director of Aviation of the

Springfield Airport Authority at the

following address: Capital Airport,

Springfield Airport Authority,

Springfield, Illinois 62707.

Air carriers and foreign air carriers

may submit copies of written comments

previously provided to the Springfield

Airport Authority under section 158.23

of Part 158.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.

Louis H. Yates, Manager, Chicago

Airports District Office, 2300 East

Devon Ave., Room 258, Des Plaines,

Illinois 60018, (708) 294–7335. The

application may be reviewed in person

at this same location.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA

proposes to rule and invites public

comment on the application to use the

revenue from a PFC at Capital Airport

under the provisions of the Aviation

Safety and Capacity Expansion Act of

1990 (Title IX of the Omnibus Budget

Reconciliation Act of 1990) (Public Law

101–508) and Part 158 of the Federal

Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 158).

On February 17, 1995, the FAA

determined that the application to use

the revenue from a PFC submitted by

the Springfield Airport Authority was

substantially complete within the

requirements of section 158.25 of Part

158. The FAA will approve or

disapprove the application, in whole or

in part, no later than May 29, 1995.

The following is a brief overview of

the application.

Level of the proposed PFC: $3.00.

Actual charge effective date: February

1, 1994.

Estimated charge expiration date:

January 31, 2006.

Total approved net PFC revenue:

$4,585,443.00.

Brief description of proposed

project(s):

1. Acquisition of Miller Property

2. Rehabilitate Entrance Road

3. Acquisition of Proximity Suits

4. Acquisition of a Front End Loader

5. Terminal Building Expansion

Class or classes of air carriers which the

public agency has requested not be

required to collect PFCs: On Demand

Air Taxis.

Any person may inspect the

application in person at the FAA office

listed above under FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT.

In addition, any person may, upon

request, inspect the application, notice

and other documents germane to the

application in person at the Springfield

Airport Authority.

Issued in Des Plaines, Illinois on February

28, 1995.

Benito De Leon,

Manager, Planning and Programming Branch,

Airports Division, Great Lakes Region.

[FR Doc. 95–5639 Filed 3–7–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

Notice of Intent To Rule on Application

To Impose and Use the Revenue From

a Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) at

Lynchburg Regional Airport,

Lynchburg, VA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of intent to rule on

application.

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to rule and

invites public comment on the

application to Impose and use the

revenue from a PFC at Lynchburg

Regional under the provisions of the

Aviation Safety and Capacity Expansion

Act of 1990 (Title IX of the Omnibus

Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990)

(Public Law 101–508) and Part 158 of

the Federal Aviation Regulations (14

CFR Part 158).

DATES: Comments must be received on

or before April 7, 1995.