alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CEO        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** (18        U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

| 1)   | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                  and |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2)   | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:           November                  5, 2007 |                                              |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                     | /s/  John                  R. Plachetka |
|                                                                                                     | John                  R. Plachetka, Pharm.D.      |
|                                                                                                     | Chief                  Executive Officer          |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4251 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4251

   To create a point of order against legislation making nondefense 
 discretionary appropriations that would increase the deficit during a 
                       period of high inflation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 May 18 (legislative day, May 17), 2022

  Mr. Scott of Florida introduced the following bill; which was read 
           twice and referred to the Committee on the Budget

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To create a point of order against legislation making nondefense 
 discretionary appropriations that would increase the deficit during a 
                       period of high inflation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. POINT OF ORDER IN THE SENATE AGAINST LEGISLATION MAKING 
              NONDEFENSE DISCRETIONARY APPROPRIATIONS THAT WOULD 
              INCREASE THE DEFICIT DURING A PERIOD OF HIGH INFLATION.

    (a) Point of Order.--It shall not be in order in the Senate to 
consider any bill, joint resolution, motion, amendment, amendment 
between the Houses, or conference report making appropriations for the 
revised nonsecurity category (as defined in section 250(c) of the 
Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 
900(c))) that, if enacted, would increase the deficit over the period 
of current fiscal year, the budget year, and the ensuing 9 fiscal years 
following the budget year if the annualized change in the most recently 
monthly report on the Consumer Price Index for All-Urban Consumers 
published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the Department of Labor 
is not less than 12 percent.
    (b) Waiver and Appeal.--Subsection (a) may be waived or suspended 
in the Senate only by an affirmative vote of two-thirds of the Members, 
duly chosen and sworn. An affirmative vote of two-thirds of the Members 
of the Senate, duly chosen and sworn, shall be required to sustain an 
appeal of the ruling of the Chair on a point of order raised under 
subsection (a).
    (c) Effective Date.--This section shall apply on and after July 1, 
2022.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 50 (Wednesday, March 15, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 13908]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6360]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION

36 CFR Part 1230

[3095-AA22]


Micrographic Records Management

AGENCY: National Archives and Records Administration.

ACTION: Correcting amendments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains corrections to the final regulations 
which were published Wednesday, September 22, 1993 (58 FR 49195). The 
regulations related to micrographic records management including 
standards for microfilming records in 36 CFR 1230.12(d)(1)(i).

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 15, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Ann Hadyka or Nancy Allard on 301-713-6730.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The final regulations that are the subject of these corrections 
established Federal agency micrographic program responsibilities, 
revised micrographic standards, modified coverage of temporary records, 
and clarified inspection provisions. The regulations affected Federal 
agencies.

Need for Corrections

    The final regulation intended to revise the title of the Part from 
``Micrographics'' to ``Micrographic Records Management'' to better 
reflect the subject matter; due to a technical drafting error, the 
change in title was not made although the final rule displayed the 
revised title. In Sec. 1230.12(d)(1)(i), a typographical error was made 
in the ANSI/AIIM standard referenced of aperture card formats.

List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 1230

    Archives and records, Incorporation by reference, Micrographics.

PART 1230--MICROGRAPHICS

    Accordingly, 36 CFR 1230 is corrected by making the following 
correcting amendments:
    1. The authority citation for part 1230 continues to read:

    Authority: 44 U.S.C. 2907, 3302, and 3312.

    2. The title of Part 1230 is revised to read:

PART 1230--MICROGRAPHIC RECORDS MANAGEMENT


Sec. 1230.12  [Corrected]

    3. In Sec. 1230.12(d)(1)(i), in the fourth sentence, the phrase 
``ANSI/AIIM MS19-1987'' is revised to read ``ANSI/AIIM MS32-1987''.

    Dated: March 9, 1995.
Mary Ann Hadyka,
Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 95-6360 Filed 3-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7515-01-M
#### Kathryn BEWLEY *v.*PYRAMID LEASING COMPANY, Inc.

98-1340

980 S.W.2d 556

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered December 10, 1998

*Sanford &*Stiritz, by: *Jon R. Sanford,*for appellant.

*Peel & Simmons P.A.,*by: *John R. Peel,*for appellee.

Per Curiam.

The appellant, Kathryn Bewley, filed a motion for a belated appeal from an order of the Pope County Circuit Court. The following time line outlines the relevant action in the trial court:

> 1. *July 13, 1998*—Judgment entered in trial court

> 2. *July 17, 1998*— Motion for New Trial filed by appellant

> 3. *August 5, 1998*— Motion for New Trial heard and orally denied

> 4. *August 7, 1998*— Notice of Appeal filed by appellant

> 5. *August 17, 1998*— Motion for New Trial deemed denied

> 6. *August 18, 1998*— Order denying Motion for New Trial filed

Arkansas Rule of Appellate Procedure — Civil 4(d) (1998) provides that a party desiring to appeal a judgment must file a notice of appeal within thirty days from (1) the entry (filing) of the order disposing of the motion, or (2) the date on which the motion is deemed denied pursuant to Ark. R. App. P. — Civ. 4(c). According to Rule 4(c), the instant appellant extended the time for filing a notice of appeal when she filed her motion for new trial on July 17th. The appellee, Pyramid Leasing Company, Inc., *374correctly points out that the appellant’s August 7th notice of appeal is untimely because it was filed prior to August 17th, the day on which the motion for new trial was deemed denied. Consistent with our rules of procedure and our decision in *Lawrence Bros., Inc. v. R.J. “Bob” Jones Excavating Contractor, Inc.,*318 Ark. 328, 884 S.W.2d 620 (1994) (per curiam), we deny the appellant’s motion for belated appeal.
**Exhibit 32**
 
 **CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
 **PURSUANT TO**
 **18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  I, Parrish Medley, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Davi Skin, Inc. for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Davi Skin, Inc.
   By:              /s/ Parrish Medley
 Name:         Parrish Medley
 Title:            Chief Executive Officer
 Date:            November 18, 2004
  
 I, Margaret Robley, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Davi Skin, Inc. for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Davi Skin, Inc.
 By:               /s/ Margaret Robley
 Name:          Margaret Robley
 Title:            Chief Financial Officer
 Date:            November 18, 2004
 1
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2158

Cedar Electronics Corporation:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 20, 2021.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, May 20, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A21D0316. SUSAN WHITNEY RENFROE v. JEFFREY TODD RENFROE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

20A00004
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-10477

A.W. Chesterton Company:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
<PAGE>



                              COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE - EXHIBIT 11.1
                             (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

                                                 (UNAUDITED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

BASIC LOSS PER COMMON SHARE:

                                        THREE MONTHS ENDED                      NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                           SEPTEMBER 30,                           SEPTEMBER 30,
                                  ---------------------------------     -----------------------------------
                                       2000              1999                2000               1999
                                  --------------    ---------------     ---------------    ----------------
<S>                                <C>               <C>                 <C>                <C>
Net loss                           $     (6,233)     $      (3,836)      $     (15,817)     $       (6,240)
                                  ==============    ===============     ===============    ================
Weighted average shares
outstanding                          22,480,071         22,480,071          22,480,071          22,479,862
                                  ==============    ===============     ===============    ================
Loss per common share              $      (0.28)     $       (0.17)      $       (0.70)     $        (0.28)
                                  ==============    ===============     ===============    ================


DILUTED LOSS PER COMMON SHARE:

                                         THREE MONTHS ENDED                     NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                            SEPTEMBER 30,                         SEPTEMBER 30,
                                  ---------------------------------     -----------------------------------
                                       2000              1999                2000              1999
                                  --------------    ---------------     ---------------    ----------------
Net loss                           $     (6,233)     $      (3,836)      $     (15,817)     $       (6,240)
                                  ==============    ===============     ===============    ================
Weighted average shares
outstanding                          22,480,071         22,480,071          22,480,071          22,479,862

Effect of dilutive shares-stock
options                                       -                  -                   -                   -
                                  --------------    ---------------     ---------------    ----------------
Total weighted average dilutive
shares                               22,480,071         22,480,071          22,480,071          22,479,862
                                  ==============    ===============     ===============    ================
Loss per common share              $      (0.28)     $       (0.17)      $       (0.70)     $        (0.28)
                                  ==============    ===============     ===============    ================
</TABLE>
Ex-99.3 a)

                         LIBERTY LENDING SERVICES, INC.
                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE
                        ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

This serves as Liberty Lending Services, Inc. Officer's Certificate/Annual
Statement as to Compliance for the servicing of loans under the Bear Stearns
(SAMI) Structured Asset Mortgage Investments Trust, Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates, Series 1998-10, Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated November 1,
1998 and Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement dated November 19, 1998 with your
concern.

1. A review of the activities during the proceeding fiscal year and of the
performance with the requirements of the Agreement has been made under the
Officer's supervision.

2. To the best of the Officers' knowledge, based on the above review, Liberty
Lending Services, Inc. has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement
throughout the fiscal year.

3. Real estate taxes have been paid as required by the terms of the mortgage.

4. Mortgage insurance premiums due under the contract of insurance with FHA or
PMI carriers have been paid as required.



                                     - 6 -
<PAGE>

5. Insurance is being maintained, is fully paid, and complies with the
Agreement. Adequate hazard insurance is in force on all loans as required under
this Agreement Flood insurance coverage, if required, is in force. If escrowed,
insurance/PMI premiums and taxes/assessment monies have been analyzed, in
accordance with RESPA, to ensure sufficient funds are being collected in escrow
for the current year.

6. Property inspections have been performed as stated in the Agreement, unless
otherwise amended.

7. Appropriate IRS notices were performed in accordance with IRS Regulations.

8. Disbursements from Trust Account funds were made for proper purposes, and all
payments required to be made by the Agreement have been made.

9. Proper fidelity coverage and errors and omissions insurance are in force as
required.

10. Loans with variable rare features have been changed in accordance with terms
of the note.

11. Liberty Lending Services, Inc. is authorized by applicable law to service
the mortgages, and it has and will continue to satisfy all licensing,
registration, and other requirements of the Agreement. There is, as of this
date, no default in the fulfillment of any of its obligations under the
Agreement known to this Officer. As an Officer of Liberty Lending Services,
Inc., individually, I certify to the best of my knowledge, that the foregoing
statements are true and correct.



                                                Date: January 26, 2001
/s/ Barbara R. Bowser
------------------------
Barbara R. Bowser
Assistant Vice President
EXHIBIT 32.1



CEO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with Form 10-Q of POZEN Inc. (the Company), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I,
John R. Plachetka, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                            
|---------------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date: November 9, 2005 |  | /s/ John R. Plachetka      
|                       |  | John R. Plachetka, Pharm.D.
|                       |  | Chief Executive Officer    



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



36
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Consorteum Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Joseph R. Cellura, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.           The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date:  October 13, 2011





/s/Joseph R. CelluraJoseph R. Cellura,Chief Executive Officer andChief Financial Officer