8044 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 17, 2016 / Notices 

‘‘Certain Pasta from Italy: Calculation 

Memorandum—the Rummo Group,’’ dated 

February 9, 2016. 

9The margin for the non-examined companies 

was based on the calculated weighted-average 

margin of La Molisana (the sole mandatory 

respondent receiving an above de minimis margin 

in these final results). 

10 In these final results, the Department applied 

the assessment rate calculation method adopted in 

Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the 

Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 

Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 

(February 14, 2012). 

As a result of the aforementioned 

recalculation of the Rummo Group’s 

rate, the weighted-average dumping 

margin for the two non-selected 

companies has changed. 

Final Results of the Review 

As a result of this review, the 

Department determines the following 

weighted-average dumping margins 9 for 

the period July 1, 2013, through June 30, 

2014: 

Producer and/or exporter 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

La Molisana S.p.A. ..................... 12.90 

Rummo S.p.A., Lenta 

Lavorazione, Pasta Castiglioni, 

and Rummo S.p.A. Molino e 

Pastificio (collectively, the 

Rummo Group) ....................... 0.00 

Pastificio Andalini S.p.A. ............ 12.90 

Delverde Industrie Alimentari 

S.p.A. ...................................... 12.90 

Duty Assessment 

The Department shall determine and 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries.10 For any 

individually examined respondents 

whose weighted-average dumping 

margin is above de minimis, we 

calculated importer-specific ad valorem 

duty assessment rates based on the ratio 

of the total amount of dumping 

calculated for the importer’s examined 

sales to the total entered value of those 

same sales in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(b)(1). Upon issuance of the final 

results of this administrative review, if 

any importer-specific assessment rates 

calculated in the final results are above 

de minimis (i.e., at or above 0.5 percent), 

the Department will issue instructions 

directly to CBP to assess antidumping 

duties on appropriate entries. 

We intend to issue assessment 

instructions directly to CBP 15 days 

after publication of the final results of 

this review. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the notice of final results 

of administrative review for all 

shipments of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review, as provided by 

section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash 

deposit rate for respondents noted above 

will be the rate established in the final 

results of this administrative review; (2) 

for merchandise exported by 

manufacturers or exporters not covered 

in this administrative review but 

covered in a prior segment of the 

proceeding, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the company specific rate 

published for the most recently 

completed segment of this proceeding; 

(3) if the exporter is not a firm covered 

in this review, a prior review, or the 

original investigation, but the 

manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate 

will be the rate established for the most 

recently completed segment of this 

proceeding for the manufacturer of the 

subject merchandise; and (4) the cash 

deposit rate for all other manufacturers 

or exporters will continue to be 15.45 

percent, the all-others rate established 

in the antidumping investigation as 

modified by the section 129 

determination. These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers Regarding the 

Reimbursement of Duties 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) 

to file a certificate regarding the 

reimbursement of antidumping and/or 

countervailing duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during the POR. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Department’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping and/or 

countervailing duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of doubled 

antidumping duties. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective orders (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return/destruction of 

APO materials, or conversion to judicial 

protective order, is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and the terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.213(h). 

Dated: February 9, 2016. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Final Issues 

and Decision Memorandum 

Summary 

I. Background 

Scope of the Order 

II. List of Comments 

III. Analysis of Comments 

La Molisana 

Comment 1: Pasta Shape 

Comment 2: General and Administrative 

(G&A) Ratio 

Comment 3: Indirect Selling Expenses 

Comment 4: Direct Materials Calculation 

Comment 5: Direct Selling Expenses 

Comment 6: Applying Differential Pricing 

Analysis 

The Rummo Group 

Comment 7: Treatment of Pasta Castiglioni’s 

Home Market Control Numbers 

Comment 8: Treatment of Matching U.S. 

Sales with Home Market Sales 

Comment 9: Treatment of the Manufacturers, 

Rummo and Pasta Castiglioni 

Comment 10: Treatment of the Rummo 

Group’s Freight Revenue 

Comment 11: Application of a Cap for 

Certain U.S. Market Freight Revenue 

(FRTREVU) 

Comment 12: Application of a Countervailing 

Duty Offset (CVDU) to Rummo 

Comment 13: Treatment of Negative Margins 

Associated with the Differential Pricing 

(DP) Methodology 

IV. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2016–03252 Filed 2–16–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–601] 

Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts 

Thereof, Finished and Unfinished, 

From the People’s Republic of China: 

Final Rescission of Antidumping Duty 

New Shipper Review; 2014–2015 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce 

DATES: Effective February 17, 2016. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Elizabeth Eastwood, AD/CVD 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 17, 2016 / Notices 8045 

1See Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, 

Finished and Unfinished, From the People’s 

Republic of China: Preliminary Rescission of 

Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review; 2014– 

2015, 80 FR 79561 (December 22, 2015) 

(Preliminary Rescission Notice). 

2 Id., at 79561. 

3See section 751(a)(2)(B)(iii) of the Act ; see also 

19 CFR 351.214(e). 

Operations, Office II, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–3874. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On December 22, 2015, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) published the preliminary 

rescission of the new shipper review of 

the antidumping duty (AD) order on 

tapered roller bearings and parts thereof, 

finished and unfinished (TRBs), from 

the People’s Republic of China (PRC) for 

Zhejiang Changxing CTL Auto Parts 

Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (Changxing).1

We invited parties to comments on our 

Preliminary Rescission Notice; however, 

no interested party submitted 

comments. Therefore, we made no 

changes to our analysis for purposes of 

this final rescission, and we are 

rescinding the new shipper review of 

the AD order on TRBs from the PRC 

with respect to Changxing. 

Scope of the Order 

Imports covered by the order are 

shipments of tapered roller bearings and 

parts thereof, finished and unfinished, 

from the PRC; flange, take up cartridge, 

and hanger units incorporating tapered 

roller bearings; and tapered roller 

housings (except pillow blocks) 

incorporating tapered rollers, with or 

without spindles, whether or not for 

automotive use. These products are 

currently classifiable under Harmonized 

Tariff Schedule of the United States 

(HTSUS) item numbers 8482.20.00, 

8482.91.00.50, 8482.99.15, 8482.99.45, 

8483.20.40, 8483.20.80, 8483.30.80, 

8483.90.20, 8483.90.30, 8483.90.80, 

8708.70.6060, 8708.99.2300, 

8708.99.4850, 8708.99.6890, 

8708.99.8115, and 8708.99.8180. 

Although the HTSUS item numbers are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, the written description of the 

scope of the order is dispositive. 

Rescission of Review 

As discussed in the Preliminary 

Rescission Notice, Changxing failed to 

respond to the Department’s request for 

additional information regarding 

possible entries of subject merchandise 

that predated the applicable period of 

review (POR).2 In the absence of any 

comments on this issue, we continue to 

find on the basis of adverse facts 

available, pursuant to section 776(a) and 

(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(the Act), that Changxing had additional 

entries of subject merchandise prior to 

the POR (June 1, 2014, through May 31, 

2015) that were not reported to the 

Department at the time of Changxing’s 

request for a new shipper review. Based 

on the foregoing, we find that 

Changxing does not meet the minimum 

requirements for a new shipper review 

under 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(iv)(C) in 

that Changxing’s request did not contain 

documentation establishing the date of 

its first sale to an unaffiliated customer 

in the United States. Because we find 

that Changxing’s request for a new 

shipper review did not satisfy the 

regulatory requirements for initiation of 

a new shipper review, we are rescinding 

the new shipper review of the AD order 

on TRBs from the PRC with respect to 

Changxing. 

Assessment Rates 

Because we are rescinding the new 

shipper review of Changxing, we are not 

making a determination as to whether 

Changxing qualifies for a separate rate. 

Therefore, Changxing remains part of 

the PRC entity and any entries covered 

by this new shipper review will be 

assessed at the PRC-wide rate. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

Effective upon publication of the final 

rescission of the new shipper review of 

Changxing, the Department will instruct 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection to 

discontinue the option of posting a bond 

or security in lieu of a cash deposit for 

entries of subject merchandise from 

Changxing.3 Because we did not 

calculate a dumping margin for 

Changxing or grant Changxing a 

separate rate in this new shipper review, 

we find that Changxing continues to be 

part of the PRC-wide entity. The cash 

deposit rate for the PRC-wide entity is 

92.84 percent. These cash deposit 

requirements shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Department’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Administrative Protective Order 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.305(a)(3), this notice also serves as 

a final reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under the APO, 

which continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials or conversion to 

judicial protective order is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and terms of an APO is a 

violation subject to sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This new shipper review and notice 

are in accordance with sections 

751(a)(2)(B) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.214(f)(3). 

Dated: February 8, 2016. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2016–03261 Filed 2–16–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Institute of Standards and 

Technology 

Proposed Information Collection; 

Comment Request; National Institute 

of Standards and Technology (NIST), 

Generic Clearance for Community 

Resilience Data Collections 

AGENCY: National Institute of Standards 

and Technology, Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of 

Commerce, as part of its continuing 

effort to reduce paperwork and 

respondent burden, invites the general 

public and other Federal agencies to 

take this opportunity to comment on 

proposed and/or continuing information 

collections, as required by the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

DATES: Written comments must be 

submitted on or before April 18, 2016. 

ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments 

to Jennifer Jessup, Departmental 

Paperwork Clearance Officer, 

Department of Commerce, Room 6616, 

14th and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230 (or via the 

Internet at JJessup@doc.gov). 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES