alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                          9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                     APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                            $3,859,362
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        159,629
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   4,151,915
<PP&E>                                             2,295,493
<DEPRECIATION>                                        73,236
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     7,267,043
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                938,460
<BONDS>                                              635,084
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                1
<COMMON>                                          17,081,615
<OTHER-SE>                                                 0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       7,267,043
<SALES>                                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           0
<CGS>                                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   4,659,766
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    26,991
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            0
<INCOME-TAX>                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (4,686,757)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (0.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (0.36)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS
INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           9,360
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,382
<ALLOWANCES>                                       220
<INVENTORY>                                      5,419
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,054
<PP&E>                                           8,160
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,150
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  37,791
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,048
<BONDS>                                            600
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            47
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,850
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    37,791
<SALES>                                         49,472
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                88,449
<CGS>                                           26,849
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   53,613
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                26,388
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   270
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  57
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,614
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,414
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,200
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,200
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.10


</TABLE>
#### MAY F. JONES v. MRS. ROBERT J. CRADDOCK.

(Filed 17 March, 1937.)

Appeal and Error § 55—

A decision of the Supreme Court in reviewing a judgment as of nonsuit that plaintiff was not guilty of contributory negligence on her own statement, has reference only to the judgment as of nonsuit, and does not preclude the submission of the issue of contributory negligence upon the subsequent trial.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Sink, J.,*at January Term, 1937, of Buncombe.

Civil action for death of plaintiff’s dog, alleged to have been caused by negligence of defendant in operation of automobile.

The issues of negligence and contributory negligence were both answered in the affirmative by the jury. From judgment thereon plaintiff appeals, assigning error in the submission of the second issue.

*J. Y. Jordan, Jr,, for plaintiff, appellant.*

*Harkins, Van Winkle ■& Walton for defendant, appellee.*

Per Curiam.

As the verdict is supported by the evidence, there was no error in submitting the issue of contributory negligence to the jury.

The statement on the former appeal, “The contention that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence on her own statement is untenable on this record” (210 N. C., 429, 187 S. E., 558), was hot intended to preclude the submission of the issue to the jury, but had reference to the motion to nonsuit, the only matter then being considered. *Hayes v. Tel. Co., ante,*192.

The verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.
#### MARGARET LOUISE GAULDIN, Administratrix of the Estate of CLIFTON WAYNE GAULDIN, Deceased v. STOKES LUMBER COMPANY (Incorporated).

(Filed 14 December, 1960.)

Appeal by plaintiff from *Gwyn, J.,*at June 11, 1960 Civil Term, Guilford Superior Court (Greensboro Division).

Civil action to recover for alleged wrongful death arising out of a collision between intestate of plaintiff, a child six years of age, and a truck belonging to Stokes Lumber Company.

Two issues were raised by the pleadings, — the first, as to whether plaintiff’s intestate, Clifton Wayne Gauldin, was killed by the negligence of- the defendant as alleged in the complaint; and the second, as to amount of damages resulting therefrom. And on trial in the Superior Court the case was submitted to the jury upon the evidence offered by the respective parties under the charge of the court. The jury answered the first issue in the negative, — thereby eliminating the necessity of answering the second. From judgment entered in accordance therewith in favor of defendant, plaintiff excepts thereto and appeals to Supreme Court, and assigns error.

*Folger & Ellington, Jordan, Wright, Henson*<fc *Nichols for plaintiff, appellant.*

*Smith, Moore, Smith, Schell & Hunter, Poteat & Franks for defendant appellee.*

PeR CüRiam.

The question involved on this appeal as- stated by plaintiff appellant is this: “Did the trial judge adequately declare, explain and apply the law arising on the evidence given in the case in compliance with the requirment of G.S. 1-180?”

Careful perusal of the charge of the court, read contextually and in the light of the evidence before the jury, discloses that the case was adequately and understandably presented. And the verdict is in keep-
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Subtropical Plant Pathology Research: Fort Pierce, FL
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Fort Pierce, Florida U.S. Horticultural Research Laboratory Subtropical Plant Pathology Research Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Research Projects Subjects of Investigation at this LocationEach ARS research project has related subjects of investigation.  Listed below are the subjects of investigation currently conducted at this location.
Clicking on a subject of investigation will list the research projects within that  subject of investigation.Subjects of Investigation
                            Cucurbits, other (includes pumpkin, squash, gourd)
                                Finfish
                                Grapefruit
                                Orange
                                Ornamental trees and shrubs
                                Peach
                                Strawberry
                                Tomato


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-1707

DTV Motor Corporation:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001059697
<NAME>                        SF Holdings Group, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        SEP-24-2000
<PERIOD-START>                           SEP-27-1999
<PERIOD-END>                             MAR-26-2000
<CASH>                                         5,631
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                139,936
<ALLOWANCES>                                   4,173
<INVENTORY>                                  222,888
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             408,485
<PP&E>                                       472,366
<DEPRECIATION>                                98,622
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               949,401
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        491,271
<BONDS>                                      379,095
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         38,968
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                       2,251
<OTHER-SE>                                   (27,421)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 949,401
<SALES>                                      595,194
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             595,194
<CGS>                                        507,707
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                507,707
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            34,700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (6,210)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (1,850)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (4,706)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (525)
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (5,231)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Greg Petersen, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Activant Solutions Inc. (the
Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section
906), that, to the best of my knowledge:  
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three and six months ended
March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Activant
Solutions Inc. and will be retained by Activant Solutions Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. By:/s/ GREG PETERSEN
    
    5/13/05Greg Petersen
    DateSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

LINDA S. RESTREPO AND

CARLOS E. RESTREPO, D/B/A

COLLECTIVELY RDI GLOBAL

SERVICES, AND R&D

INTERNATIONAL,

 Appellants,

v.

ALLIANCE RIGGERS &

CONSTRUCTORS, LTD.,

 Appellee. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-15-00244-CV

Appeal from

County Court at Law No. 5

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC # 2012DCV04523)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the appeal should be 

dismissed for want of jurisdiction, in accordance with the opinion of this Court. We therefore 

dismiss the appeal. We further order that because Appellant is indigent, no order regarding costs 

is made. We further order that this decision be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2015.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.

(Hughes, J., not participating)
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 35 (Wednesday, February 22, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 9841]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4225]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

First Mariner Bancorp, et al.; Formations of; Acquisitions by; 
and Mergers of Bank Holding Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied for the Board's 
approval under section 3 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 
1842) and Sec.  225.14 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.14) to 
become a bank holding company or to acquire a bank or bank holding 
company. The factors that are considered in acting on the applications 
are set forth in section 3(c) of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Each application is available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. Once the application has been accepted 
for processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing to the Reserve Bank or to the offices of the Board of 
Governors. Any comment on an application that requests a hearing must 
include a statement of why a written presentation would not suffice in 
lieu of a hearing, identifying specifically any questions of fact that 
are in dispute and summarizing the evidence that would be presented at 
a hearing.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received not later than March 17, 1995.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (Lloyd W. Bostian, Jr., Senior 
Vice President) 701 East Byrd Street, Richmond, Virginia 23261:
    1. First Mariner Bancorp (formerly MarylandsBank Corp.), Towson, 
Maryland; to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of 
the voting shares of First Mariner Bank (formerly MarylandsBank, FSB), 
Towson, Maryland.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (James A. Bluemle, Vice 
President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690:
    1. Capitol Bancorp, Ltd., Lansing, Michigan; to acquire 100 percent 
of the voting shares of Grand Haven Bank, Grand Haven, Michigan, a de 
novo bank.
    C. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (John E. Yorke, Senior Vice 
President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64198:
    1. First Place Financial Corporation, Farmington, New Mexico; to 
acquire 100 percent of the voting shares of Western Bank, Gallup, New 
Mexico.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 15, 
1995.
William W. Wiles,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-4225 Filed 2-21-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2616

Price Pump Company:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 48 (Monday, March 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13434-13435]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5988]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-5169-1]


Report on the Status of Urban Area Source Research Program

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the public availability of an EPA report 
[[Page 13435]] titled ``EPA's Urban Area Source Research Program--A 
Status Report on Preliminary Research.'' The Clean Air Act calls for 
EPA to produce this report.

DATES: This report will be available at the addresses indicated below 
on March 13, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the report may be obtained by writing or phoning: 
March 13, 1995 to April 15, 1995:

Ms. Gloria J. Koch, Technical Information Officer, Atmospheric Research 
and Exposure Assessment Laboratory (MD-75), U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, Telephone: 919-
541-4109
After April 15, 1995: U.S. Department of Commerce, National Technical 
Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Larry T. Cupitt, Director, Methods 
Research and Development Division, Atmospheric Research and Exposure 
Assessment Laboratory (MD-77), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, Telephone: 919-541-2454.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA is announcing the public availability of 
a report titled ``EPA's Urban Area Source Research Program--A Status 
Report on Preliminary Research.'' The report was called for under 
section 112(k) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7412(k). Issuance of the 
report does not represent final agency action.
    The report summarizes the status of the Agency's urban area source 
research program. The report presents the preliminary research findings 
on area sources of hazardous air pollutants located in urban areas. The 
report does not make EPA policy determinations about area sources as 
possible sources of hazardous air pollutants and does not affect any 
legal rights or impose any obligations. Information collected through 
the research program will be considered by the Administrator when 
developing the national urban area source strategy required by Section 
112(k)(3) of the Clean Air Act.

    Dated: March 3, 1995.
Robert J. Huggett,
Assistant Administrator for Research and Development.
[FR Doc. 95-5988 Filed 3-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M