alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Adams Golf, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify that:
The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 (the "Periodic Report") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  | ADAMS GOLF, INC.                     
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|                      |  |                                      
|Date:  August 8, 2007 |  | By:/S/ OLIVER G. BREWER III          
|                      |  | Oliver G. Brewer, III                
|                      |  | Chief Executive Officer and President
|                      |  |                                      
|Date:  August 8, 2007 |  | By:/S/ ERIC LOGAN                    
|                      |  | Eric Logan                           
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer              
|                      |  | (Principal Financial Officer)        





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Periodic Report or as a separate disclosure document
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Adams Golf, Inc. and will be retained by Adams Golf, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1



                           METRETEK TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

                                  SUBSIDIARIES
                                  ------------



SUBSIDIARIES OF METRETEK TECHNOLOGIES, INC.:

     PowerSpring, Inc. a Delaware corporation (82.5%)
     Southern Flow Companies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (100%)
     Metretek, Incorporated, a Florida corporation (100%)
     Marcum Gas Transmission, Inc., a Colorado corporation (100%)
     Marcum Denver, Inc., a Colorado corporation (100%)

WHOLLY-OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF MARCUM GAS TRANSMISSION, INC.:

     Marcum Capital Resources, Inc., a Colorado corporation

WHOLLY-OWNED SUBSIDIARIES OF METRETEK, INCORPORATED:

     Metretek Europe Limited, a company organized and existing under the laws of
     Great Britain
     Sigma VI, Inc., a Florida corporation

WHOLLY-OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF POWERSPRING, INC.:

     Mercator Energy Incorporated, a Colorado corporation
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          12,775
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  332,834
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               345,609
<PP&E>                                       2,258,374
<DEPRECIATION>                                  28,473
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,575,510
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          791,740
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,783,770
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,575,510
<SALES>                                        513,694
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               518,615
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  112,611
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              79,309
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                326,695
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            326,695
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   326,695
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 13.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. §1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
  In connection with the Annual Report of Lorus Therapeutics Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ended May 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Elizabeth Williams, Director of Finance and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
  1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  
  Date:  November 29, 2010
  /s/ Elizabeth Williams
 Elizabeth Williams
 Director of Finance and Acting Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 43 (Monday, March 6, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 12206]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5394]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Air Force


USAF Scientific Advisory Board; Meeting

    The Electronics Panel of the USAF Scientific Advisory Board will 
meet on 3-7 April 1995 at Wright Patterson, AFB, OH from 8:00 a.m. to 
5:00 p.m.
    The purpose of this meeting will be to provide science and 
technology assessments on issues relating to electronics.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with Section 
552b of Title 5, United States Code, specifically subparagraphs (1) and 
(4) thereof.
    For further information, contact the Scientific Advisory Board 
Secretariat at (703) 697-4648.
Patsy J. Conner,
Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-5394 Filed 3-6-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3910-01-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2090

Prestolite Electric Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
#### EVA LEE JUSTICE FOY, Widow; EVA LEE FOY, J. H. FOY, JR., GEORGE EDWARD FOY and JEAN ELIZABETH FOY, Children, v. MAUDLIN MOTOR COMPANY, Employer, and U. S. FIDELITY & GUARANTY COMPANY, Carrier.

(Filed 7 May, 1941.)

Appeal by plaintiffs from *Williams, J.,*at December Term, 1940, of New HaNoveR.

Affirmed.

*Ilarriss Newman and E. K. Bryan for plaintiffs.*

*Thomas A. Banks, R. L. Savage, and Joyner & Yarborough for defendants.*

Per Curiam.

This was a proceeding under the Workmen’s Compensation Act to secure compensation for the death of John Henry Foy. *865The Industrial Commission found as a fact, from the evidence offered, that the injury by accident resulting in the death of the decedent did not arise out of nor in the course of his employment as an automobile salesman, and denied compensation. Upon appeal to the Superior Court the award was affirmed and judgment rendered accordingly. As there was evidence to sustain the finding and conclusion of the Industrial Commission, the judgment below must be affirmed. *Lockey v. Cohen, Goldman & Co.,*213 N. C., 356, 196 S. E., 342; *Buchanan v. Highway Com.,*217 N. C., 173, 7 S. E. (2d), 382. The exception to the denial of plaintiffs’ motion to remand the ease to the Industrial Commission cannot be sustained. *Byrd v. Lumber Co.,*207 N. C., 253, 176 S. E., 572.

Judgment affirmed.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2550

Primex Family of Companies:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                         Consent of Independent Auditors



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (No. 33-62402) pertaining to the 1991 Incentive Stock Option Plan,
Stock Grants and Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreements, the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-93546) pertaining to the 1994 Stock Option
Plan, 1994 Director Stock Option Plan and the Written Compensation Agreement
with R. David Ridgeway, the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No.
333-21699) pertaining to the 1994 Stock Option Plan, the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-21701) pertaining to the 1996 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan and Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreements, the Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-06865) pertaining to the registration of
1,614,802 shares of common stock, the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No.
333-14483) pertaining to the registration of 1,125,580 shares of common
stock, the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-21117) pertaining to
the registration of 493,895 shares of common stock, the Registration
Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-18575) pertaining to the registration of
5,000,000 shares of common stock and $5,000,000 of debt securities of
Children's Broadcasting Corporation of our report dated January 31, 1996,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended December 31, 1996.

                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 27, 1997


                                       184
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-1805

GHL International, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
#### SADIE B. MEXER v. FENNER AND BEANE.

(Filed 24 May, 1933.)

Appeal by plaintiff from *Alley, J.,*at February Term, 1933, of BuNcombe.

Affirmed.

*Charles B. MacRae for appellant.*

*A. Hall Johnston and Merrimon, Adams & Adams for appellees.*

Pee Cttbiam.

The defendants are stock brokers with whom the plain'tiff dealt in the purchase and sale of securities. She brought suit against them and recovered a verdict for $1,205.33. Thereupon the parties settled the controversy between them and at the April-May Term, 1929, of .the Superior Court of Buncombe County, Judge Schenck signed a judgment that the plaintiff recover nothing upon the verdict and that the defendants pay the cost. The plaintiff then signed a release in consideration of $1,205.33, the receipt of which she acknowledged, and discharged the defendants “from any and all claims and demands of every kind, nature and character.” This was a final settlement.

After the lapse of more than two years the plaintiff again brought suit against the defendants, alleging that she had a further claim of $600 against them. Upon the evidence which she offered her cause was dismissed as in case of nonsuit by the county court, and on appeal to the Superior Court the judgment was affirmed. ¥e find no error and affirm the judgment.

Affirmed.
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 49 (Tuesday, March 14, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13737-13738]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6209]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50-213]

Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co.; Notice of Issuance of 
Amendment to Facility Operating License

    The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Commission) has issued 
Amendment No. 184 to Facility Operating License No. DPR-61 issued to 
the Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company (the licensee), which 
revised the Technical specifications for operation of the Haddam Neck 
Plant located in Middlesex County, Connecticut. The amendment is 
effective as of the date of issuance to be implemented within 30 days 
of issuance.
    The amendment revises Technical Specification (TS) 3/4.4.10, 
``Structural Integrity,'' surveillance requirement 4.4.10. In 
particular, the change will add a footnote to the TS for an extension 
for one cycle of the ultrasonic volumetric inspection for the areas of 
higher stress concentration for RCPs 1 and 2.
    The application for the amendment complies with the standards and 
requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), 
and the Commission's rules and regulations. The Commission has made 
appropriate findings as required by the Act and the Commission's rules 
and regulations in 10 CFR Chapter I, which are set forth in the license 
amendment.
    Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendment and Opportunity 
for Hearing in connection with this action was published in the Federal 
Register on February 8, 1994 (59 FR 5787). No request for a hearing or 
petition for leave to intervene was filed following the notice.
    The Commission has prepared an Environmental Assessment related to 
the action and has determined not to prepare an environmental impact 
statement. Based upon the environmental assessment, the Commission has 
concluded that the issuance of the amendment will not have a 
significant effect on the quality [[Page 13738]] of the human 
environment (60 FR 11124).
    For further details with respect to the action see (1) the 
application for amendment dated December 22, 1993, (2) Amendment No. 
184 to License No. DPR-61, (3) the Commission's related Safety 
Evaluation, and (4) the Commission's Environmental Assessment. All of 
these items are available for public inspection at the Commission's 
Public Document Room, the Gelman Building, 2120 L Street, NW., 
Washington, DC, and at the local public document room located at the 
Russell Library, 123 Broad Street, Middletown, CT 06457.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 6th day of March 1995.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Alan B. Wang,
Project Manager, Project Directorate I-4, Division of Reactor 
Projects--I/II, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 95-6209 Filed 3-13-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>               5

<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            12-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                        Dec-31-1997
<CASH>                                1,507,782
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                         1,730,114
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      3,426,357
<PP&E>                               40,624,204
<DEPRECIATION>                       15,613,520
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       28,683,959
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 1,610,754
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                 45,174
<OTHER-SE>                           15,460,621
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         28,683,959
<SALES>                               6,857,072
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      8,070,518
<CGS>                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         2,054,149
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        790,517
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       39,598
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       2,900,773
<INCOME-TAX>                            738,291
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   2,162,482
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                          2,162,482
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              0.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                              0.64



</TABLE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 13, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2069

Ardagh Group:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4121 

To designate the Kol Israel Foundation Holocaust Memorial in Bedford 

Heights, Ohio, as a national memorial. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 28, 2022 

Mr. BROWN (for himself and Mr. PORTMAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To designate the Kol Israel Foundation Holocaust Memorial 

in Bedford Heights, Ohio, as a national memorial. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF THE KOL ISRAEL FOUNDA4 TION HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL AS A NATIONAL 

5 MEMORIAL. 

6 (a) CONGRESSIONAL RECOGNITION.—Congress— 

7 (1) recognizes the significance of the Kol Israel 

8 Foundation Holocaust Memorial in preserving the 

9 memory of the 6,000,000 Jews murdered by the 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4121 IS

1 Nazi regime and allies and collaborators of the Nazi 

2 regime; and 

3 (2) honors the life and legacy of the Holocaust 

4 survivors who erected the Kol Israel Foundation 

5 Holocaust Memorial. 

6 (b) DESIGNATION.— 

7 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Kol Israel Foundation 

8 Holocaust Memorial located in Bedford Heights, 

9 Ohio, is designated as a national memorial. 

10 (2) EFFECT OF DESIGNATION.— 

11 (A) IN GENERAL.—The national memorial 

12 designated by paragraph (1) is not a unit of the 

13 National Park System. 

14 (B) USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS.—The des15 ignation of the national memorial by paragraph 

16 (1) shall not require or permit Federal funds to 

17 be expended for any purpose relating to the na18 tional memorial. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS