alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-11467

Trio Engineered Products:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Crop Diseases, Pests and Genetics Research: Parlier, CA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Research Units
                        San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Sciences Center
                                    Commodity Protection and Quality Research
                                    Water Management Research
                                    National Arid Land Plant Genetic RepositorySearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Parlier, California San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Sciences Center Crop Diseases, Pests and Genetics Research Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Research Projects Subjects of Investigation at this LocationEach ARS research project has related subjects of investigation.  Listed below are the subjects of investigation currently conducted at this location.
Clicking on a subject of investigation will list the research projects within that  subject of investigation.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION  Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted), Daniel M. Bradbury, the President and Chief Executive Officer of
Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company), and Mark G. Foletta, the Senior
Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:  1.The Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009, to
which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Periodic Report),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2.The information
contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the
Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company for the period covered
by the Periodic Report.   Dated:February 26, 2010  /S/ DANIEL M. BRADBURY
  
  /S/ MARK G. FOLETTADaniel M. Bradbury
  
  Mark G. FolettaPresident and Chief
  Executive Officer
  
  Senior Vice President,
  Finance and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> 4

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         356,003
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  290,635
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     70,921
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,108,434
<PP&E>                                         736,696
<DEPRECIATION>                                 735,800
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,199,007
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,581,855
<BONDS>                                      1,015,136
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     22,172
<COMMON>                                         6,144
<OTHER-SE>                                 (7,623,664)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,199,007
<SALES>                                        763,592
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,225,550
<CGS>                                          312,453
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,191,807
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             312,279
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                390,279
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            390,279
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   390,279
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04


</TABLE>
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No
. 21

- 7660

CHARLES A. INKO

- TARIAH , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. FEDERAL MEDICAL CENTER BUTNER, NC; ART F. BEELER; RALPH NEWMAN; BRYON HERBEL; EDWARD LANDIS, III; JEAN ZULA; ROBERT E. COCHRANE , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. James C. Dever III, District Judge. ( 5:21

- ct

- 03230

- D )

Submitted : March 24, 2022 Decided: March 29, 2022

Before MOTZ, WYNN , and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Charles A. Inko

- Tariah , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Charles A. Inko

- Tariah appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated b y the district court.
Inko

- Tariah v. Fed. Med. Ctr. Butner , No. 5:21

- ct

- 03230

- D (E.D.N.C. Nov. 4, 2021).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.
AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<MULTIPLIER>  1000

<S>                      <C>            <C>           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>            12-MOS         12-MOS        12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>        DEC-31-1997    DEC-31-1996   DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>           JAN-01-1997    JAN-01-1996   JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>             DEC-31-1997    DEC-31-1996   DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                             0             16           235
<SECURITIES>                       0              0             0
<RECEIVABLES>                  36768          33773         61286
<ALLOWANCES>                    3468           3108          2700
<INVENTORY>                        0              0             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               38098          70392         72301
<PP&E>                         11110          11795         21301
<DEPRECIATION>                  8066           8888         14517
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 45288          83457         91530
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          25510          47154         45326
<BONDS>                            0              0             0
<COMMON>                         100            100           100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0              0             0
<PREFERRED>                        0              0             0
<OTHER-SE>                     15710          17693         28673
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   45288          83457         91530
<SALES>                        92239          96246        105224
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               92239          96246        105224
<CGS>                          80503          87644         96633
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  80503          87644         96633
<OTHER-EXPENSES>               11317           7878          3825
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0              0             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              1589            724           850
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (1170)          (245)         3916
<INCOME-TAX>                    (500)          ( 80)         1567
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (670)          (165)         2349
<DISCONTINUED>                   648         (10872)         (403)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0              0             0
<CHANGES>                          0              0             0
<NET-INCOME>                     (22)        (11037)         1946
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      0          (1.24)          .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                      0          (1.24)          .01



</TABLE>
exhibit10a.htm
















Exhibit 10(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 38 to the Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-35784) pertaining to Lincoln National Variable Annuity Account H, which is incorporated by reference into Post-Effective Amendment No. 39, and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) April 1, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 6, 2011, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln National Variable Annuity Account H.


 


                                        /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


 


Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


June 20, 2011
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 37 (Friday, February 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10421-10422]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4576]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Public Information Collection Requirements Submitted to OMB for 
Review

February 17, 1995.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, Public Law 96-511. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

U.S. Customs Service (CUS)

OMB Number: 1515-0065
Form Number: CF 7501 and CF 7501A
Type of Review: Extension
Title: Entry Summary (7501) and Entry Continuation Sheet (7501A)
Description: Customs Form 7501 is used by Customs as a record of the 
impact transaction, to collect the proper duty, taxes, exactions, 
certifications and enforcement endorsements, and to provide copies to 
Census for statistical purposes.
Respondents: Businesses or other for-profit
Estimated Number of Respondents: 2,675
Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent: 20 minutes
Frequency of Response: On occasion
Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 3,454,852 hours
Clearance Officer: Laverne Williams, (202) 927-0229, U.S. Customs 
Service, Printing and Records Management Branch, Room 6216, 1301 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20229 [[Page 10422]] 
OMB Reviewer: Milo Sunderhauf, (202) 395-7340, Office of Management and 
Budget, Room 10226, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 
20503.
Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-4576 Filed 2-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4820-02-P
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2132

Reelcraft Industries:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 96-50396

Summary Calendar

__________________

JUAN T. JONES,

 Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS

DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,

INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, ET AL.,

 Respondents-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. SA-96-CA-67

- - - - - - - - - -

September 4, 1996

Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Juan T. Jones, Texas inmate #501610, appeals the dismissal

of his habeas petition for abuse of the writ. See Rule 9(b) of

the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Jones fails to argue the

propriety of the Rule 9(b) dismissal. Therefore, the issue is

deemed abandoned on appeal. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222,

224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). Because the only issue which could be
No.

-2-

raised on appeal is abandoned, the appeal is frivolous. 5th Cir.

R. 42.2. Therefore, the appeal is DISMISSED.
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 42 (Friday, March 3, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11966-11967]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5228]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP94-352-002]

Western Gas Interstate Co.; Compliance Filing

February 27, 1995.
    Take notice that on February 17, 1995, Western Gas Interstate 
Company (Western) in compliance with the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission s (Commission) order of December 19, 1994, Western is filing 
a report showing the final balances of Account No. 191 and detailing 
any amounts collected or disbursed to date of the report including all 
schedules pertinent to annual PGA filings, i.e., Schedules A, B, C1, C2 
and D. This filing also includes tariff sheets specifying the effective 
date of the billings, the customers billed and the amounts. Western has 
not included any information concerning the nine month payment option 
because there were not any provisions for a nine month payment option 
considered as part of Western's settlement agreement.
    Western states that, its filing proposes changes to its tariff 
sheets by issuing two tariff sheets First Revised Sheet No. 12 and 
Original Sheet No. 13. Western further states that the Tariff sheet are 
proposed to become effective April 1, 1994.
    Western requested a waiver of the Commission regulation to direct 
bill Southern Union Gas Company for $30,559. This amount is 
attributable to [[Page 11967]] their share of the amounts paid to El 
Paso Natural Gas Company as a result of the Commission decision in 
their rate case.

    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sec. 385.211 of 
the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests should be 
filed on or before March 6, 1995. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make the protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of 
this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-5228 Filed 3-2-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

FELECIA C. MOORE,

Appellant,

v.

ARCH BAY HOLDINGS, LLC, Series 2009B,

Appellee.

No. 4D16-3042

[July 27, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Joel T. Lazarus, Judge; L.T. Case No. 09-

58732CACE(11).

Catherine A. Riggins, Miami, for appellant.

Ira Scot Silverstein of Ira Scot Silverstein, PLLC, Fort Lauderdale, for 

appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, DAMOORGIAN and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### C. C. HENDERSON v. JENKINS HARDWARE COMPANY, Incorporated.

(Filed 8 March, 1933.)

Appeal and Error J c—

Where there is no finding of fact and no request therefor the Supreme Court upon appeal will not attempt to ascertain the truth from conflicting affidavits, and the judgment will be affirmed, it being presumed correct with the burden on appellant to show error.

Civil actioN, before *Moore, J.,*at June Term, 1932, of Wilkes.

*Buford T. Henderson for plaintiff.*

*J. H. Whicker for defendant.*

*776Pee Cubiam.

A justice of the peace rendered judgment for the plaintiff on 25 May, 1931. The defendant appealed and the appeal was docketed in the Superior Court on 12 October, 1931. The return of the justice of the peace was dated 30 May, 1931, and recites that notice of appeal was served on him on 30 May, and docketing fees paid. The cause came on for hearing in the Superior Court at the June Term, 1932, and the plaintiff lodged a motion to dismiss the appeal for the reason that it was not docketed in due time. The trial judge denied the motion and retained the cause for trial, and the plaintiff appealed.

There is no finding of fact and no request therefor. There are two affidavits in the record, but this Court cannot undertake to wrestle out the truth from conflicting affidavits. The burden is on the appellants to show error. In the absence of such showing the judgment of the Superior Court is presumed to be correct.

Affirmed.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2474

Titan Flow Control: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions.

pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk February 26, 2010

p0222 

# Order

February 26, 2010

139804

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139804 COA: 284652 Oakland CC: 06-210963-FC WILLIAM STANLEY PATTISON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to appeal the August 25, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.