alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
31

                                                                  EXHIBIT  99.2




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Integrated Information
Systems,  Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), for the quarterly period
ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I, Donald H. Megrath, Senior Vice President, and
Chief  Financial  Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934     (15 U.S.C. Section 78m(a) or
78o(d));  and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of
the Company.

INTEGRATED  INFORMATION  SYSTEMS,  INC.



/s/  Donald  H.  Megrath
------------------------
Donald  H.  Megrath
Senior  Vice  President,  Chief  Financial  Officer  and  Secretary

Date:  August  13,  2003
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of A.W., a child, * From the 326th District Court

 of Taylor County,

 Trial Court No. 8683-CX.

No. 11-18-00355-CV * May 23, 2019

* Memorandum Opinion by Wright, S.C.J.

 (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

 Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

 sitting by assignment) 

 (Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the 

order of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
**Exhibit 31.2**

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

**pursuant to Section 302 of the**

**Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

I, Heng Chuk, certifythat: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Diametrics Medical, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting. 

Date: April 10, 2006
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 13, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2146

Pall Corporation:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 13, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3597

Omega Environmental Technologies, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 47 (Friday, March 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13123-13130]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5870]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Per Diem, Travel and Transportation Allowance Committee

AGENCY: Per Diem, Travel and Transporation Allowance Committee, DOD.

ACTION: Publication of Changes in Per Diem Rates.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Per Diem, Travel and Transportation Allowance Committee is 
publishing Civilian Personnel Per Diem Bulletin Number 182. This 
bulletin lists changes in per diem rates prescribed for U.S. Government 
employees for official travel in Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, the 
Northern Mariana Islands and Possessions of the United States. Bulletin 
Number 182 is being published in the Federal Register to assure that 
travelers are paid per diem at the most current rates.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 1, 1995. [[Page 13124]] 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document gives notice of changes in per 
diem rates prescribed by the Per Diem Travel and Transportation 
Allowance Committee for non-foreign areas outside the continental 
United States. Distribution of Civilian Personnel Per Diem Bulletins by 
mail was discontinued effective June 1, 1979. Per Diem Bulletins 
published periodically in the Federal Register now constitute the only 
notification of change in per diem rates to agencies and establishments 
outside the Department of Defense.
    The text of the Bulletin follows:

BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
                                                                       
    [[Page 13125]]
    
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN10MR95.022


[[Page 13126]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN10MR95.023


[[Page 13127]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN10MR95.024


[[Page 13128]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN10MR95.025


[[Page 13129]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN10MR95.026


[[Page 13130]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN10MR95.028



BILLING CODE 5000-04-C

    Dated: March 6, 1995.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 95-5870 Filed 3-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
Exhibit 99.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Next Generation Technology Holdings,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Donald C. Schmitt Chairman and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     3)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     4)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



                                               By:  /S/ DONALD C. SCHMITT
                                               ---  ---------------------
                                               Name: Donald C. Schmitt
                                               Title: Chairman and Chief
                                               Financial Officer


                                      -13-
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Salisbury  Bancorp,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending  September 30, 2008, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
John F. Perotti,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  and I, John F. Foley,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ John F. Perotti                           /s/ John F. Foley
-------------------                           -----------------
    John F. Perotti                               John F. Foley
    Chief Executive Officer                       Chief Financial Officer

                                       27
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2720

Price Pump Company:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4130 

To repeal changes made by health care reform laws to the Medicare exception 

to the prohibition on certain physician referrals for hospitals, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 3, 2022 

Mr. LANKFORD (for himself, Mr. MARSHALL, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. BARRASSO, 

Mr. YOUNG, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. CRUZ, Mr. COTTON, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. 

TILLIS, Mr. CASSIDY, and Mr. PAUL) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To repeal changes made by health care reform laws to the 

Medicare exception to the prohibition on certain physician referrals for hospitals, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Patient Access to 

5 Higher Quality Health Care Act of 2022’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 4130 IS

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF HEALTH CARE REFORM PROVISIONS 

2 LIMITING MEDICARE EXCEPTION TO THE 

3 PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN PHYSICIAN RE4 FERRALS FOR HOSPITALS. 

5 Sections 6001 and 10601 of the Patient Protection 

6 and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111–148; 124 Stat. 

7 684, 1005) and section 1106 of the Health Care and Edu8 cation Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Public Law 111–152; 

9 124 Stat. 1049) are repealed and the provisions of law 

10 amended by such sections are restored as if such sections 

11 had never been enacted. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
EXHIBIT 11 - STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

                          CUMBERLAND TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                            Year Ended December 31,
                                                                          ----------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                2001                     2000                   1999
                                                                          ----------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                                       <C>                    <C>                     <C>
Average shares outstanding ...................................              5,589,167               5,528,849              5,475,613
Dilutive stock options .......................................                 22,500                 113,500                134,500
                                                                          -----------             -----------            -----------
Totals .......................................................              5,611,667               5,642,349              5,610,113
                                                                          ===========             ===========            ===========
Income (loss) before extraordinary gain ......................            $  (100,242)            $ 1,041,749            $ 1,148,070
Extraordinary gain ...........................................                158,610                    --                     --
                                                                          -----------             -----------            -----------
Net income ...................................................            $    58,368             $ 1,041,749            $ 1,148,070
                                                                          ===========             ===========            ===========
Income per diluted share:
------------------------
Income (loss) before extraordinary gain ......................            $     (0.02)            $      0.19            $      0.21
Extraordinary gain ...........................................                   0.03                    --                     --
                                                                          -----------             -----------            -----------
Net income ...................................................            $      0.01             $      0.19            $      0.21
                                                                          ===========             ===========            ===========



</TABLE>
#### J. B. RICE v. ASHEVILLE ICE COMPANY and ELECTRIC ICE COMPANY.

(Filed 14 June, 1933.)

Monopolies B a — C. S., 2563 (3), does not apply where parties are not competitors.

A demurrer is properly sustained in an action by a retailer of ice against wholesalers thereof for damages for their refusal to sell plaintiff ice on the same terms as those offered to other retailers in the city, it not appearing that the defendants were business competitors of plaintiff and C. S., 2563(3) not applying.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Alley,*Jat March Term, 1933, of Binsr-combe.

Affirmed.

The plaintiff is engaged in business in the city of Asheville, N. C., as a retail dealer in ice in said city and its vicinity.

The defendants are corporations organized under the laws of this State. Each defendant is engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling ice, at both wholesale and retail, in the said city of Asheville.

It is alleged in the complaint in this action that defendants are the only manufacturers of ice engaged in business in the city of Asheville, and therefore have a monopoly of that business in said city, and its vicinity; that both defendants have refused to sell ice to the plaintiff for resale and distribution to his customers at the price and on the terms established by them for other persons engaged in business as retailers of ice in the city of Asheville; and that by such refusal the defendants *769have caused the plaintiff to suffer damages in a large sum. This action was instituted by the plaintiff to recover of the defendants such damages.

The action was heard on the demurrer of the defendant, Asheville Ice Company, to the complaint, on the ground that the facts stated therein are not sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The demurrer was sustained.

Summons has not been served on the defendant, Electric Ice Company nor has said defendant filed an answer to the complaint, or otherwise entered an appearance in the action.

From judgment dismissing the action, the plaintiff appealed to the Supreme Court.

*Edward E. McMahan and J. W. Pless for plaintiff.*

*Alfred S. Barnard for defendant.*

Pee Cubiam.

The judgment in this action is affirmed on the authority of *Lewis v. Archbell,*199 N. C., 205, 154 S. E., 11.

It does not appear from the complaint that plaintiff has suffered damages caused by any unlawful act of either of the defendants. The plaintiff is not a competitor or rival in business of either of the defendants. For this reason subsection 3 of section 2563 of the Consolidated Statutes of North Carolina, is not applicable to the facts alleged in the complaint.

The demurrer was properly sustained. The judgment dismissing the action, is

Affirmed.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2911

C&K Components, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel