alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


CHIEF
      FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of Davi
      Skin,
      Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, to my knowledge, that:





|(1) | the
              Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of Davi Skin, Inc. for the quarter
              ended
              March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or
              15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|(2) | the
              information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A for
              the
              quarter ended March 31, 2005, fairly presents in all material respects,
              the financial condition and results of operations of Davi Skin,
              Inc.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




By:
            /s/
                Joseph SpellmanName:
            Joseph
                SpellmanTitle:
            Principal
                Executive Officer and DirectorDate:
            March
                2, 2006By:
            /s/
                Margaret RobleyName:
            Margaret
                RobleyTitle:
            Principal
                Financial OfficerDate:
            March
                2, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLAR

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         469,255
<SECURITIES>                                 1,132,592
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,801,528
<ALLOWANCES>                                   110,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,479,748
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,332,810
<PP&E>                                       4,476,509
<DEPRECIATION>                                 791,177
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,713,283
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,731,062
<BONDS>                                      4,524,656
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,944
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,406,248
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,713,283
<SALES>                                        417,091
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,320,727
<CGS>                                          397,561
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,049,095
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,412,440
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               187,325
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             240,899
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,653,339)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,653,339)
<DISCONTINUED>                               1,177,077
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (476,262)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)


</TABLE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2379

Quest Technologies dba Crystal Quest:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 50 (Wednesday, March 15, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 13999]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6398]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of a Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
Heart, Lung, and Blood Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meeting:

    Name of SEP: Review of the Vascular Disease Academic Award.
    Date: April 9-10, 1995.
    Time: 7 p.m.
    Place: Holiday Inn, Chevy Chase, Maryland.
    Contact Person: S. Charles Selden, Ph.D., 5333 Westbard Avenue, 
Room 552, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, (301) 594-7476.
    Purpose/Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in sec. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. Applications 
and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable material and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the applications 
and/or proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Programs Nos. 93.837, Heart 
and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; and 
93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes 
of Health.)

    Dated: March 9, 1995.
Margery G. Grubb,
Senior Committee Management Specialist, NIH.
[FR Doc. 95-6398 Filed 3-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2639

Datacolor, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 49 (Tuesday, March 14, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 13727]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6190]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration on Aging


White House Conference on Aging Advisory Committee on Disability; 
Notice of Establishment

    Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 
the Department of Health and Human Services announces the establishment 
by the Secretary of the White House Conference on Aging Advisory 
Committee on Disabilities.
    The Committee shall advise and make recommendations with respect to 
disability issues to the Secretary and the Assistant Secretary for 
Aging to assist in planning and conducting the Conference and in 
reviewing the resolutions produced by the Conference delegates.
    The Committee shall terminate on September 30, 1995.

    Dated: March 8, 1995.
Fernando M. Torres-Gil,
Assistant Secretary for Aging.
[FR Doc. 95-6190 Filed 3-13-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4130-02-M
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mervin S. Kato, certify, that to my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MIPS Technologies, Inc. for the three months ended December 31, 2006 (theForm 10-Q), to which this
certificate is an exhibit fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of MIPS Technologies, Inc. for the three month period covered by the Form 10-Q.



|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  |                                                                                  
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                    |  |  | 
|Date: June 28, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ MERVIN S. KATO
|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  | Mervin S. Kato Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer, MIPS Technologies, Inc

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided by MIPS Technologies
and will be retained by it and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### A. T. JACKSON v. JAY CLARK and WHITFORD MOTOR COMPANY, INC.

(Filed 18 September, 1957.)

Appeal by defendant Clark from *Frizz elle, J.,*and a jury, at February Term, 1957, of CeaveN.

*Ward & Tucker for defendant, appellant.*

*Raymond E. Sumrell for plaintiff, appellee.*

Per Curiam.

This is a civil action brought by the plaintiff to recover for damage to his automobile resulting from a rear-end collision. The plaintiff was driving his car across the State highway bridge over Neuse River at New Bern. He was being followed by a car driven by the defendant Clark. The plaintiff slowed down when he was about half-way across the bridge. When he did so, the rear of his car was hit and damaged by the front of the car driven by the defendant Clark. The plaintiff alleged several phases of negligence against the defendant Clark as proximate causes of the collision, including excessive speed, failure to maintain a proper lookout, and failure to exercise proper control over his car. All allegations of negligence were denied by the defendant. Both sides offered evidence. Issues of negligence and damages were submitted to the jury and answered in favor of the plaintiff. From judgment on the verdict awarding the plaintiff damages in the sum of $400 against the defendant Clark, he appeals, assigning as the only error the refusal of the court to allow his motion for judgment as of nonsuit at the close of the evidence.

We have reviewed carefully the evidence and find it amply sufficient to sustain the ruling of the trial court. The appeal presents no question requiring extended discussion. See *Insurance Co. v. Motors, Inc.,*241 N.C. 67, 84 S.E. 2d 301.

No error.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-14-00749-CR

IN RE Steven Mitchell GARY

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: November 5, 2014

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

Relator Steven Mitchell Gary filed this pro se petition for writ of mandamus on October 

27, 2014, complaining of the trial court’s failure to rule on pending motions in the underlying 

criminal proceeding. Relator has been appointed trial counsel to represent him in connection with 

the criminal charges pending against him. We conclude that any original proceeding on the issue 

raised should be presented by relator’s trial counsel. Relator is not entitled to hybrid representation. 

See Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). The absence of a right to hybrid 

representation means relator’s pro se mandamus petition will be treated as presenting nothing for 

this court’s review. See id.; see also Gray v. Shipley, 877 S.W.2d 806, 806 (Tex. App.—Houston 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2014CR2945, styled The State of Texas v. Steven Mitchell Gary, pending in 

the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Mary D. Roman presiding.

 
04-14-00749-CR

[1st Dist.] 1994, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

- 2 -
#### IN THE MATTER OF EVA R. BEAL.

(Filed 6 May, 1931.)

Trial G a: Appeal and Error J b — No appeal will lie from action of trial court in setting aside verdict in his discretion.

Where the trial court sets aside the verdict as a matter within his discretion no appeal will lie therefrom, and in such cases it is not necessary that he should find the facts.

Civil actioN, before *Small, J.,*at October Term, 1930, of Guilfokd.

*Sharp & Shany for caveators.*

*Glidewell, Dunn & Gwyn for propounders.*

Pee Oukiam:.

The question of law involved appears from the following findings of fact and judgment entered by the trial judge:

> “This cause came on for trial, and during the progress of the trial, and before more than one witness had completed her testimony it was suggested to the court by counsel present, that the propounder to the will was represented by counsel, to wit, Senator P. *W.*Glidewell, of Reidsville; that the court had previously inquired if the propounder was represented by counsel, and was informed by counsel for the caveator that he knew of no counsel representing the propounder.

That, during the progress of the trial, and when the court was informed that Mr. Glidewell represented the propounder, the court informed counsel for the caveator of this fact and told counsel for the caveator that the court would allow him to proceed, but that if it after-*755wards developed tbat tbe propounder was represented by counsel, tbat tbe court would probably set aside tbe verdict.

Tbe court finds as a fact tbat P. *W.*Glidewell is a practicing attorney of Reidsville, North Carolina, and is a regular practicing attorney in tbe county of Guilford, and tbat said Glidewell bad not received a copy of tbe calendar upon wbicb tbe case was calendared for trial, and tbat said Glidewell appeared witbin about two hours after tbe verdict of tbe jury and made a motion to set aside tbe verdict, stating tbat be was tbe regularly retained counsel for the propounder. Tbe court so found as a fact all of tbe above as stated, and set aside tbe verdict in tbe court’s discretion, and refused to sign tbe judgment tendered by counsel for the caveator.” •

From tbe foregoifig it appears tbat tbe judge set aside tbe verdict in bis discretion. In such cases it is not necessary to find tbe facts, and tbe judgment is affirmed upon authority of *Bird v. Bradburn,*131 N. C., 488; *Abernethy v. Yount,*138 N. C., 337; *Likas v. Lackey,*186 N. C., 398.

Affirmed.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3774

Cummins Inc Power Systems Business Unit: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions.

pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXHIBIT
31.1
  
 **CERTIFICATIONS**
  I, Ronald
S. Saks, certify that:
  1.  I have
reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of LMI Aerospace, Inc.;
  2.  Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3.  Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
  4.  The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
  a)  Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;
  b)  Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
  c)  Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
  5.  The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
  a)  All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
  b)  Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.
  Date:  May
      16, 2005
    /s/
      Ronald S. SaksRonald
      S. SaksChief
      Executive Officer and President
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 13, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2107

Ardagh Group:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn