alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3831 

To require the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 

to conduct a study relating to COVID–19 immunity resulting from a 

prior infection, vaccination, or both, and the COVID–19 pandemic. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 14, 2022 

Mr. BRAUN (for himself and Mr. MARSHALL) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To require the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, 

and Medicine to conduct a study relating to COVID– 

19 immunity resulting from a prior infection, vaccination, or both, and the COVID–19 pandemic. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Apply the Science Act 

5 2.0’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3831 IS

1 SEC. 2. NATIONAL ACADEMIES OF SCIENCES, ENGINEER2 ING, AND MEDICINE STUDY ON NATURAL IM3 MUNITY IN RELATION TO THE COVID–19 PAN4 DEMIC. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 45 days after the 

6 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Health and 

7 Human Services shall seek to enter into a contract with 

8 the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and 

9 Medicine (referred to in this section as the ‘‘National 

10 Academies’’) to conduct a study related to the current sci11 entific evidence on the durability of immunity to COVID– 

12 19. 

13 (b) INCLUSIONS.—The study pursuant to the con14 tract under subsection (a) shall include— 

15 (1) an assessment of scientific evidence related 

16 to the durability of immunity resulting from SARS– 

17 CoV–2 infection, COVID–19 vaccination, or both, 

18 including any differences between population groups; 

19 (2) an assessment of the extent to which the 

20 Federal Government makes publicly available the 

21 scientific evidence used by relevant Federal depart22 ments and agencies to inform public health rec23 ommendations related to immunity resulting from 

24 SARS–CoV–2 infection and COVID–19 vaccination; 

25 and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3831 IS

1 (3) a summary of scientific studies and evidence 

2 related to SARS–CoV–2 infection-acquired immunity 

3 from a sample of other countries or multilateral or4 ganizations. 

5 (c) REPORT.—Not later than 18 months after the 

6 date of enactment of this Act, the National Academies 

7 shall submit to the Committee on Health, Education, 

8 Labor, and Pensions of the Senate and the Committee on 

9 Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives 

10 a report on the study pursuant to subsection (a). 

11 (d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATION.—There is 

12 authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be nec13 essary for fiscal year 2023 to carry out this section. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### STATE v. ROSSIE FREEMAN.

(Filed *14*December, 1960.)

Criminal Daw § 161—

An inadvertence in placing the burden upon the State to satisfy the fury by the greater weight of the evidence must be held for prejudicial error, notwithstanding that in other portions of the charge the burden of proof is correctly defined.

Appeal by defendant from *Mallard, J.,*October 1959 Criminal Term, of Columbus.

Defendant was charged with an assault with a deadly weapon, inflicting serious injury, not resulting in death. The jury returned a verdict of guilty as charged. Prison sentence was imposed and defendant appealed.

*Attorney General Bruton and Assistant Attorney General McGal-liard for the State.*

*Hackett & Weinstein for defendant, appellant.*

Per CuRiam.

The court charged the jury the defendant’s plea of not guilty was a challenge to the credibility of the State’s evidence, entitling defendant “to an acquittal unless and until the State has satisfied you from the evidence and by its greater weight of his guilt.”

Conviction could only be had upon proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. .The jury was so informed in a subsequent portion of the *578charge. The error in defining the degree of proof required was undoubtedly a “slip of the tongue.” Nonetheless, it was prejudicial, entitling defendant to a

New trial.
2012 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

10-10-2012

Pierre Joseph v. Hess Oil VI Corp

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential

Docket No. 11-8026

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2012

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2012 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Pierre Joseph v. Hess Oil VI Corp" (2012). 2012 Decisions. Paper 229.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2012/229
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

December 8, 2011

#ECO-019

No. 11-8026

Pierre P. Joseph

v.

Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp., Petitioner

(V.I. S. Ct. Civil No. 2009-00054)

Present: McKEE, Chief Judge, FUENTES and SMITH, Circuit Judges

1. Motion by Petitioner to Revise or Withdraw Precedential, One-Judge 

Opinion on Motion for Extension of Time;

2. Declaration of Roy T. Englert, Jr., Esq. in Support of Motion to Revise or 

Withdraw Precedential, One-Judge Opinion on Motion for Extension of 

Time;

3. Amicus Brief by the Bar Association of the Third Federal Circuit in 

Support of Petitioner.

Respectfully,

Clerk/nmr

_________________________________ORDER________________________________

The foregoing Motion to Withdraw the Opinion is DENIED. The Motion to Amend the 

Opinion is GRANTED. The precedential opinion in Joseph v. Hess Oil Virgin Islands 

Corp., No. 11-8026, which is reprinted in 651 F.3d 348 (3d Cir. 2011), is AMENDED as 

follows:

1. The first sentence in section II.B. of the opinion, which appears on page 20 

of the slip opinion and at 651 F.3d at 356 in the right hand column, is amended as set 

forth below adding the underlined text.

In light of the foregoing, I conclude that a petitioner seeking 

an extension under LAR 112.4(a) usually must demonstrate a 

need for more time based on an event or cause beyond the 

control of counsel or the petitioner.
2. At the end of the first paragraph in section II.B. of the opinion after the 

phrase “and not the rule.” and before the next paragraph which states “HOVIC has not 

demonstrated. . .”, the following footnote shall be added:

This discussion of good cause governs only motions to extend 

the time for filing a petition for certiorari under Third Circuit 

LAR 112.4(a). It does not address the standard applicable to 

a motion for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal.

 

By the Court,

Circuit Judge

/s/ D. Brooks Smith

Dated: October 10, 2012

NMR/cc: Donna M. Doblick, Esq.

Peter Goldberger, Esq.

James C. Martin, Esq.

Lee J. Rohn, Esq.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-1012

MIGUEL ADALBERTO PONCE-ARBAIZA,

 Petitioner,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: December 19, 2023 Decided: January 11, 2024

Before THACKER and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ON BRIEF: Robert J. Harris, Woodbridge, Virginia, for Petitioner. Brian Boynton, 

Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Anthony C. Payne, Assistant Director, 

Kathleen Kelly Volkert, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED 

STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1012 Doc: 40 Filed: 01/11/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Miguel Adalberto Ponce-Arbaiza, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for 

review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motion to 

reconsider. We have reviewed the administrative record and Ponce-Arbaiza’s claims and 

find no abuse of discretion. See Williams v. Garland, 59 F.4th 620, 632 (4th Cir. 2023) 

(stating standard of review). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. See In re 

Ponce-Arbaiza (B.I.A. Dec. 7, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1012 Doc: 40 Filed: 01/11/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Jeffrey B. O'Neill, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Golden State Vintners, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly represent in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



|Date: November 14, 2003                                         |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|                                                                |  | 
|/s/JEFFREY B. O'NEILLJeffrey B. O'Neill
Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|                                                                |  | 

---

QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 43 (Monday, March 6, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12203-12204]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5497]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 12204]]

COMMITTEE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF TEXTILE AGREEMENTS


Announcement of Availability of Public Comments for Viewing and 
Extension of Hours of Hearing and the Deadline for Submitting Testimony

March 2, 1995.
AGENCY: Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements (CITA).

ACTION: Notice of availability of public comments, extension of hours 
of the public hearing and extension of the deadline for submitting 
testimony for the public hearing on integration.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie Carducci, Office of Textiles and 
Apparel, U.S. Department of Commerce, (202)482-3588.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    Authority: Executive Order 11651 of March 3, 1972, as amended; 
section 204 of the Agricultural Act of 1956, as amended (7 U.S.C. 
1854).

    The Uruguay Round Agreement on Textiles and Clothing (ATC), 
approved by Congress as part of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act, 
provides for the integration of the textiles and clothing sectors into 
the World Trade Organization.
    On January 30, 1995, the Committee for the Implementation of 
Textile Agreements (CITA) published a Federal Register notice (60 FR 
5625) announcing the proposed list of products for integration in the 
second and third phases of the integration. CITA requested interested 
parties to submit comments on the proposed list and announced a hearing 
to address any significant issues related to the second and third 
phases of the integration. Comments submitted in response to 60 FR 5625 
will be available for public viewing as of the date of publication of 
this notice. Parties wishing to view the comments should contact Julie 
Carducci to make an appointment.
    The deadline for submitting testimony to be presented at the public 
hearing on integration on March 20, 1995, will be extended (from the 
original deadline of on or before March 2) to March 15, 1995. 
Therefore, all written testimony and other comments to be presented at 
the hearing must be received in triplicate by the Chairman of CITA on 
or before March 15, 1995. Submissions in triplicate should be addressed 
to the Chairman, Committee for the Implementation of Textile 
Agreements, room 3001, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230.
    The length of the hearing on integration has been extended three 
hours, and will now be held from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. on March 20, 1995, 
in the Main Commission Hearing Room at the International Trade 
Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC.
Rita D. Hayes,
Chairman, Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements.
[FR Doc. 95-5497 Filed 3-2-95; 10:54 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DR-F
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CHICAGO
TITLE CORPORATION'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT 9/30/98 AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE 9 MONTHS THEN ENDED.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         1,090,718
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      34,861
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               1,125,579
<CASH>                                         216,720
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,876,687
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                603,168
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 41,876
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,907
<OTHER-SE>                                     422,727
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,876,687
<PREMIUMS>                                   1,328,887
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             46,116
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 737
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                      88,650
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                         1,187,530
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 99,560
<INCOME-TAX>                                    37,710
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             61,850
<DISCONTINUED>                                   9,013
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    70,863
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.24
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-11601

Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) (the
Act), each of the undersigned, Floyd C. Wilson, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Shane M. Bayless, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, of Petrohawk Energy Corporation, a Delaware
corporation (the Company), hereby certify that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |                                                                
|------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 10, 2006 |  | /s/ Floyd C. Wilson                                            
|                   |  | Floyd C. Wilson                                                
|                   |  | Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer   
|                   | 
|                   |  | /s/ Shane M. Bayless                                           
|                   |  | Shane M. Bayless                                               
|                   |  | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

This certification accompanies this Form 10-Q and shall not be deemed filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section.

A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to, and will be retained by, the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



35
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 45 (Wednesday, March 8, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 12732]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5634]



========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 8, 1995 / 
Notices
[[Page 12732]]

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE


Forms Under Review by Office of Management and Budget

March 3, 1995.
    The Department of Agriculture has submitted to OMB for review the 
following proposal for the collection of information under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) since 
the last list was published. This list is grouped into new proposals, 
revisions, extension, or reinstatements. Each entry contains the 
following information:
    (1) Agency proposing the information collection; (2) Title the 
information collection; (3) Form numbers(s), if applicable; (4) Who 
will be required or asked to report; (5) An estimate of the number of 
responses; (6) An estimate of the total number of hours needed to 
provide the information; (7) Name and telephone number of the agency 
contact person.
    Questions about the items in the listing should be directed to the 
agency person named at the end of each entry. Copies of the proposed 
forms and supporting documents may be obtained from: Department 
Clearance Officer, USDA, OIRM, Room 404-W Admin. Bldg., Washington, DC 
20250, (202) 690-2118.

Extension

<bullet> Forest Service
Baseline and Trend Information on National Forest Communication Use and 
Users
Individuals or households; business or other for-profit; 2,600 
responses; 650 hours
Elizabeth L. Horn (406) 329-3089

New Collection

<bullet> Agricultural Marketing Service
Freight Forwarder Directory-Data Collection Form
TMD-7
Business or other for-profit; 1,343 responses; 443 hours
Ellen Welby (202) 690-1335
Larry K. Roberson,
Deputy Departmental Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-5634 Filed 3-7-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-01-M