Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 8, 1995 / Notices 12733

government civilian employee or

military retirement; or pensions or

veterans payments; (10) private

pensions or annuities; (11) alimony or

child support payments; (12) regular

contributions from persons not living in

the household; (13) net royalties; and

(14) other cash income. Other cash

income would include cash amounts

received or withdrawn from any source

including savings, investments, trust

accounts and other resources which

would be available to pay the price of

a child’s meal.

‘‘Income,’’ as the term is used in this

Notice, does not include any income or

benefits received under any Federal

programs which are excluded from

consideration as income by any

legislative prohibition. Furthermore, the

value of meals or milk to children shall

not be considered as income to their

households for other benefit programs

in accordance with the prohibitions in

section 12(e) of the National School

Lunch Act and section 11(b) of the

Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C.

1760(e) and 1780(b)).

The Income Eligibility Guidelines

The following are the Income

Eligibility Guidelines to be effective

from July 1, 1995 through June 30, 1996.

The Department’s guidelines for free

meals and milk and reduced price meals

were obtained by multiplying the 1995

Federal income poverty guidelines by

1.30 and 1.85, respectively, and by

rounding the result upward to the next

whole dollar. Weekly and monthly

guidelines were computed by dividing

annual income by 52 and 12,

respectively, and by rounding upward

to the next whole dollar.

Authority: (42 U.S.C. 1758(b)(1)).

Dated: March 3, 1995.

William E. Ludwig,

Administrator.

INCOME ELIGIBILITY GUIDELINES

[Effective from July 1, 1995 to June 30, 1996]

Household size

Federal poverty guidelines Reduced price meals—185% Free meals—130%

Annual Month Week Annual Month Week Annual Month Week

48 Contiguous United States, District of Columbia, Guam and Territories

1 .................................................... 7,470 623 144 13,820 1,152 266 9,711 810 187

2 .................................................... 10,030 836 193 18,556 1,547 357 13,039 1,087 251

3 .................................................... 12,590 1,050 243 23,292 1,941 448 16,367 1,364 315

4 .................................................... 15,150 1,263 292 28,028 2,336 539 19,695 1,642 379

5 .................................................... 17,710 1,476 341 32,764 2,731 631 23,023 1,919 443

6 .................................................... 20,270 1,690 390 37,500 3,125 722 26,351 2,196 507

7 .................................................... 22,830 1,903 440 42,236 3,520 813 29,679 2,474 571

8 .................................................... 25,390 2,116 489 46,972 3,915 904 33,007 2,751 635

For each add’l family member add +2,560 +214 +50 +4,736 +395 +92 +3,328 +278 +64

Alaska

1 .................................................... 9,340 779 180 17,279 1,440 333 12,142 1,012 234

2 .................................................... 12,540 1,045 242 23,199 1,934 447 16,302 1,359 314

3 .................................................... 15,740 1,312 303 29,119 2,427 560 20,462 1,706 394

4 .................................................... 18,940 1,579 365 35,039 2,910 674 24,622 2,052 474

5 .................................................... 22,140 1,845 426 40,959 3,414 788 28,782 2,399 554

6 .................................................... 25,340 2,112 488 46,879 3,907 902 32,942 2,746 634

7 .................................................... 28,540 2,379 549 52,799 4,400 1,016 37,102 3,092 714

8 .................................................... 31,740 2,645 611 58,719 4,894 1,130 41,262 3,439 794

For each add’l family member add +3,200 +267 +62 +5,920 +494 +114 +4,160 +347 +80

Hawaii

1 .................................................... 8,610 718 166 15,929 1,328 307 11,193 933 216

2 .................................................... 11,550 963 223 21,368 1,781 411 15,015 1,252 289

3 .................................................... 14,490 1,208 279 26,807 2,234 516 18,837 1,570 363

4 .................................................... 17,430 1,453 336 32,246 2,688 621 22,659 1,889 436

5 .................................................... 20,370 1,698 392 37,685 3,141 725 26,481 2,207 510

6 .................................................... 23,310 1,943 449 43,124 3,594 830 30,303 2,526 583

7 .................................................... 26,250 2,188 505 48,563 4,047 934 34,125 2,844 657

8 .................................................... 29,190 2,433 562 54,002 4,501 1,039 37,947 3,163 730

For each add’l family member add +2,940 +245 +57 +5,439 +454 +105 +3,822 +319 +74

[FR Doc. 95–5633 Filed 3–7–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410–30–M

Forest Service

Clearwater National Forest, Northern

Region

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an

environmental impact statement and

revise the land and resource

management plan (forest plan) for the

Clearwater National Forest.

SUMMARY: The current Forest Plan for

the Clearwater National Forest was

completed in September, 1987 and has

guided the management of the Forest

since then. Forest Plans shall ordinarily

be revised on a 10-year cycle or at least

every 15 years. It also may be revised

whenever the Forest Supervisor

determines that conditions or demands

in the area have significantly changed.

In January of 1993, two lawsuits were

filed against the Forest Service alleging

violations of the National Forest

Management Act, National
12734 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 8, 1995 / Notices

Environmental Policy Act, and the

Administrative Procedures Act. The

lead plaintiffs were the Sierra Club and

the Wilderness Society, representing

nine co-plaintiffs. A Settlement

Agreement was signed on September 13,

1993 and the U.S. District Court has

issued an order directing

implementation of the Settlement

Agreement.

The key component of the Settlement

Agreement was a commitment by the

Forest Service to begin the process of

revising the Clearwater Forest Plan

within 18 months of the settlement

agreement being signed to provide longterm resolution between the parties. The

settlement agreement was signed on

September 13, 1993.

The Settlement Agreement also states

that the current Forest Plan will remain

in effect during the revision process but

implementation would be modified

using four interim measures. These

interim measures provide additional

direction related to the implementation

of projects and activities in certain

roadless areas, timber harvest, old

growth and water quality.

Following the settlement agreement,

the Clearwater National Forest began

gathering background information

necessary to begin the revision process.

However, since September 1993, several

other related Forest Service planning

efforts have been initiated that involve

the Clearwater National Forest. Most

notable is the ‘‘Upper Columbia River

Basin, Environmental Impact

Statement’’ (UCRB), which will address

issues relevant to the Clearwater

National Forest and likely result in

changes to Forest Plans in the UCRB.

Notice of this effort and supporting

information was previously published

in the Federal Register on December 4,

1994.

The purpose of the Upper Columbia

River Basin, EIS is to ‘‘* * * develop

and analyze a scientifically sound,

ecosystem-based strategy for

management of lands administered by

the United States Department of

Agriculture (USDA) Forest Service.

* * * The strategy will modify existing

Forest Plans and will focus on forest,

rangeland, and aquatic/riparian

ecosystem health and the sustainability

of threatened, endangered, and sensitive

species.’’ Clearly this effort will have a

profound influence on the revision

process for the Clearwater National

Forest. Therefore, the revision schedule

for the Clearwater National Forest is

designed to coordinate with the

information and decisions produced by

the UCRB, EIS. As part of the revision

schedule separate notices will go out for

scoping, comments on the DEIS, and

comments on the FEIS.

During the next 12–18 months, while

the UCRB, EIS is in preparation, the

Clearwater National Forest will

continue to gather data and information,

and conduct assessments of resource

conditions to better frame the revision

process. Tribal governments, state or

federal agencies or the public are

invited to send comments regarding

their ideas concerning information or

data that the Clearwater National Forest

can be gathering and assessing during

this 12–18 month period.

DATES: Comments concerning resource

assessments or data gathering in support

of the Clearwater Forest Plan revision,

should be received in writing by 90 days

following the publication of this notice

in the Federal Register. A supplemental

notice will be placed in the Federal

Register announcing the beginning of

formal scoping for the DEIS with an

opportunity to comment following

completion of the UCRB, EIS.

ADDRESSES: Send written comments

concerning this proposal to James L.

Caswell, Forest Supervisor, Clearwater

National Forest, 12730 US Highway 12,

Orofino, Idaho 83544.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Doug Gochnour, Forest Planning Staff

Officer or Harry Jageman, Acting

Revision Team Leader, 12730 US

Highway 12, Orofino, Idaho 83544,

phone (208) 476–4541.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Preliminary tasks that have been

identified for assessment and data

gathering include: Land type

descriptions, social/economic, old

growth, watersheds, recreation, forest

health and fire history. In general, these

assessments will be conducted at a

smaller, more localized scale than will

occur for the entire UCRB.

Revision scoping meetings are

tentatively planned for Moscow,

Lewiston, Orofino, and Kooskia, in

Idaho and Missoula Montana. Specific

dates, times and locations will be

announced in local newspapers of

general distribution. These scoping

meetings will begin following the

completion of the UCRB, EIS presently

scheduled for summer, 1996. The

projected dates for the DEIS and FEIS

will be posted in the Federal Register at

a later date.

The alternatives considered in the

revision of the Clearwater Forest Plan

will be consistent with decisions made

in the UCRB, EIS. The purpose and

need, preliminary issues, and the scope

of the Clearwater Forest Plan revision,

will be further described in a separate

Federal Register notice at a later date.

The responsible official for the

revision of the Clearwater Forest Plan

will be the Regional Forester, Northern

Region, P.O. Box 7669, Missoula,

Montana.

David F. Jolly,

Regional Forester.

[FR Doc. 95–5567 Filed 3–7–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410–11–M

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

[Order No. 730]

Foreign-Trade Zones Board; Approval

of Export Processing Activity; Upstate

Precision Mfg., Inc. (Office Furniture

Systems) Within Foreign-Trade Zone

54, Clinton County, NY

Pursuant to its authority under the ForeignTrade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as

amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the ForeignTrade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the

following Order:

Whereas, § 400.28(a)(2) of the Board’s

regulations, requires approval of the

Board prior to commencement of new

manufacturing/processing activity

within existing zone facilities;

Whereas, the Clinton County Area

Development Corporation, grantee of

FTZ 54, Clinton County, New York, has

requested authority under § 400.32(b)(1)

of the Board’s regulations on behalf of

Upstate Precision Mfg., Inc. (UPMI), to

manufacture modular furniture panels

for export within FTZ 54 (filed 11–23–

94, FTZ Docket A(32b1)–4–94; Doc. 7–

95, assigned 2/21/95);

Whereas, pursuant to § 400.32(b)(1),

the Commerce Department’s Assistant

Secretary for Import Administration has

the authority to act for the Board in

making such decisions on new

manufacturing/processing activity

under certain circumstances, including

situations where the proposed activity is

for export only (§ 400.32(b)(1)(ii); and,

Whereas, the FTZ Staff has reviewed

the proposal, taking into account the

criteria of § 400.31, and the Executive

Secretary has recommended approval;

Now, Therefore, the Assistant

Secretary for Import Administration,

acting for the Board pursuant to

§ 400.32(b)(1), concurs in the

recommendation and hereby approves

the request subject to the Act and the

Board’s regulations, including § 400.28,

and subject to the further condition that

all textile products admitted to the zone

for UPMI shall be of U.S. origin or shall

be a good originating in the territory of

a NAFTA country (Sec. 202, PL 103–

182, 12–8–93).