alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Ex-99.1 a)




                         INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT


The Board of Directors
Liberty Lending Services, Inc.:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Management
Assertion Regarding Compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for
Mortgage Bankers Minimum Servicing Standards, that Liberty Lending Services,
Inc, ("Liberty Lending") complied with the minimum servicing standards set forth
in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION
PROGRAM FOR MORTGAGE BANKERS as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002.
Liberty Lending's management is responsible for Liberty Lending's compliance
with those minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on management's assertion about Liberty Lending's compliance based on
our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about Liberty
Lending's compliance with the minimum servicing standards specified above and
performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on Liberty
Lending's compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Liberty Lending Services, Inc.
complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards during the year
ended December 31, 2002 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ KPMG LLP

February 28, 2003
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2615

Price Pump Company:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Eric Logan, certify that:
1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Adams Golf, Inc;
2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to
       state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
       statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly
       report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
       registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4.      The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
         controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and
have:
       a)    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
 designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information

|Date:  August 2, 2004 |  | By:/S/ ERIC LOGAN            
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|                      |  | Eric Logan                   
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer      
|                      |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 48 (Monday, March 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 13431]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6037]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP94-343-004]


NorAm Gas Transmission Co.; Notice of Filing

March 7, 1995.
    Take notice that on March 2, 1995, NorAm Gas Transmission Company 
(NGT) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Fourth 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, to become effective 
February 1, 1995:

Second Sub Original Sheet No. 9
Substitute Original Sheet No. 35
Original Sheet No. 35A
Substitute Original Sheet No. 127
Original Sheet No. 127A
Substitute Original Sheet No. 215
Original Sheet No. 215A
Substitute Original Sheet No. 225
Substitute Original Sheet No. 226
Original Sheet No. 226A
Substitute Original Sheet No. 236

    NGT is modifying Sections 5.7(c)(ii)(3), 10.1, 10.3, and 14.1 of 
NGT's General Terms and Conditions, and Section 2.4 of Rate Schedule 
PS, in compliance with the Commission's January 31, 1995 Order Ruling 
on Tariff Terms and Conditions in this matter. The modification of 
Section 2.4 of Rate Schedule PS and Section 5.7(c)(ii)(3) permits 
shippers to net monthly imbalance volumes across zones. The 
modification of Section 14.1 deletes language providing for a set-off 
by NGT against amounts owed to its shippers. The revisions to Sections 
10.1 and 10.3 clarify sections of the General Terms and Conditions 
dealing with the acceptance of service requests and nominations and 
with changes in economic value under service agreements.
    NGT is also revising Section 3.1(e) of Rate Schedule FT and its 
NNTS Out-of-Zone Adjustment rates to correct an error that would have 
resulted in overcharges.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol 
Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rule 211 of 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211). All 
such protests should be filed on or before March 14, 1995. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-6037 Filed 3-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**Exhibit
32.1**
 **CERTIFICATION**
 
 Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Industrial Enterprises of
America, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to
such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
the quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the "Form 10-QSB") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-QSB
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form
10-QSB.
 
 Dated:
June 3, 2005
 /s/ Crawford Shaw
 Crawford
Shaw, Chief Executive Officer,
 Chairman
of the Board and President
 
 
 The
foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate
disclosure document.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>      1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           4,994
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,565
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,683)
<INVENTORY>                                     67,414
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,578
<PP&E>                                          38,326
<DEPRECIATION>                                (25,232)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 223,218
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,236
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           178
<OTHER-SE>                                      99,871
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   223,218
<SALES>                                        225,692
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               225,692
<CGS>                                          158,456
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   63,904
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (114)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,943
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,497)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (167)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,330)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.13)


</TABLE>
#### ANNIE BELL DURHAM v. LUECO LLOYD, Executor of CAROLINE LLOYD et al.

(Filed 11 March, 1931.)

Appeal by defendant from *Harris, J.,*at May Term, 1930, of Orange.

Affirmed.

This is an action to recover the reasonable value of services rendered by plaintiff to defendant’s testatrix, as her companion, nurse and housekeeper, during the last five years of her life. In bar of plaintiff’s recovery defendant relied chiefly on facts alleged in his answer as an estoppel.

From judgment on the verdict sustaining the contentions of plaintiff, defendant appealed to the Supreme Court.

*McLendon & Hedrick and Long & Young for plaintiff.*

*H.*A. *Whitfield, A. E. Woltz and Gottis & Gottis for defendant.*

Per Curiam.

. The court being evenly divided in opinion as to the validity of defendant’s assignments of error on his appeal from the judgment of the Superior Court, *Brogden, J.,*not sitting, the judgment is affirmed, in accordance with the practice in this Court. This decision disposes of the appeal, without becoming a precedent. *Parsons v. Board of Education, ante,*88, 156 S. E., 244; *Gooch v. Western Union Telegraph Co.,*196 N. C., 823, 146 S. E., 803, and cases cited.

Affirmed.

BrogdeN, J., not sitting.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 6 (Tuesday, January 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 2582]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-507]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-111-000]


Northwest Pipeline Corporation; Notice of Proposed Change in FERC 
Gas Tariff

January 4, 1995.
    Take notice that on December 29, 1994, Northwest Pipeline 
Corporation (Northwest), tendered for filing and acceptance as part of 
its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, Second Revised Sheet 
No. 292, with a proposed effective date of January 29, 1995. Northwest 
also submitted to the Commission an October 31, 1994 Account No. 191 
report (October Report).
    Northwest states that the purposes of this filing are (1) to 
propose direct billing the Account No. 191 amounts applicable to the 
Converting Customers shown on Second Revised Sheet No. 292 and (2) to 
file an October Report with the Commission detailing Northwest's 
October 31, 1994, Account No. 191 subaccount balances that pertain to 
the Converting Customers as described in Section 28.3 of the General 
Terms and Conditions of Northwest's FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised 
Volume No. 1. The October Report reflects additional gas costs 
pertaining to the Converting Customers recorded in Northwest's Account 
No. 191 subsequent to the period covered by Northwest's December 30, 
1993, filing in Docket No. RP94-107-000. Northwest proposes to direct 
bill the Converting Customers listed on the proposed Second Revised 
Sheet No. 292, including interest through the billing date, within 
sixty days after Commission acceptance.
    Northwest states that a copy of this filing has been served upon 
each of Northwest's affected former jurisdictional sales customers, 
upon all intervenors in Docket Nos. RP94-107 and RP94-410, and upon 
relevant state regulatory commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or protest said filing should file 
a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
of Practice and Procedure. All such motions or protests should be filed 
on or before January 11, 1995. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person 
wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of 
this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-507 Filed 1-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2612

Price Pump Company:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
#### STATE v. JAMES DAVID HAIRSTON

(Filed 11 December, 1957)

Criminal Law § 143—

Where defendant evidences his consent to a suspended judgment by making payments into court in accordance with the terms of suspension, he waives his right of appeal.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of *Sharp, S. J.,*at Chambers, 22 June 1957, CASWELL.

In April 1956 a warrant issued from the Recorder’s Court of Caswell County charging defendant with a wilful failure to support his illegitimate child, in violation of G.S. 49-2. Upon defendant’s demand a jury trial was held 28 May 1956. Defendant was represented by counsel. The jury returned a verdict of guilty. Thereupon judgment was entered imposing a prison sentence which was suspended on these conditions: “1. That he pay into the office of the Clerk of the Court the sum of Twenty Dollars ($20.00) each month for the support of his child, this amount to be paid on or before the 1st day of each month with the first payment due at this time. 2. Defendant pay the cost of this action. 3. That he pay the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) in addition to the Twenty Dollars ($20.00) to be applied to the Doctor’s bill and this amount to be paid until the Doctor bills are paid.”

The Recorder’s Court of Caswell County adjourned 28 May 1956 to meet again 4 June 1956. On 31 May 1956 defendant paid into the office of the Caswell County Recorder’s Court the amount then due under the suspended sentence entered on 28 May 1956. On 4 June 1956 defendant, through counsel, appeared in the Recorder’s Court and for the first time gave notice of appeal. The Recorder’s Court held that defendant, having consented to the judgment and partially complied with its terms by the payment of all sums then accrued and owing had waived his right of appeal. It declined to permit the appeal or to transfer the record to the Superior Court. Thereupon defendant applied to the Superior Court for *writ of certiorari.*The writ issued. The Recorder’s Court of Caswell County certified the record. The Superior Court, upon the record so certified, adjudged that plaintiff was not entitled to appeal to that court and trial *de novo.*It remanded the record to Caswell County Recorder’s Court. Defendant appealed.

*Attorney General Patton and Assistant Attorney General Bruton for the State.*

*Broton, Scurry, McMichael & Griffin and Pemberton & Blackwell for defendant appellant.*

*396Per Curiam.

Defendant is concluded by beginning compliance with the terms of the judgment rendered in May 1956. *S. v. Canady,*246 N.C. 613. G.S. 15-177.1 has no application to the facts of this case.

Appeal dismissed.
<PAGE>   1

                                   EXHIBIT 21
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                      PERCENTAGE OF
                                                                       VOTING STOCK
                                                 JURISDICTION OF         OWNED BY
               NAME OF CORPORATION                INCORPORATION       SHOLODGE, INC.
           <S>                                   <C>                  <C>
           MOBAT, Inc.                             Tennessee               100%

           Shoney's Inn of Lebanon, Inc.           Tennessee               100%

           Nashville Air Associates, Inc.          Tennessee               100%

           Moore and Associates, Inc.              Tennessee               100%

           Virginia Inns, Inc.                     Tennessee               100%

           Sumner Venture, Inc.                    Tennessee               100%

           ShoLodge Franchise Systems, Inc.        Tennessee               100%

           Sunshine Inns, Inc.                     Tennessee               100%

           LAFLA Inn, Inc.                         Tennessee               100%

           Midwest Inns, Inc.                      Tennessee               100%

           Southeast Texas Inns, Inc.              Tennessee               100%

           The Hotel Group, Inc.                    Kansas                 100%(1)

           Delaware Inns, Inc.                     Tennessee               100%

           Carolina Inns, Inc.                     Tennessee               100%

           Alabama Lodging Corporation             Tennessee               100%

           ShoLodge Beverage Corporation             Texas                 100%(2)

           Suite Tenant, Inc.                      Tennessee               100%

</TABLE>

--------------
(1) Through Midwest Inns, Inc.
(2) Through Southeast Texas Inns, Inc.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-1886

American Transportation Technology Corporation: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 50 (Wednesday, March 15, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 13985]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6336]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
[Correction To Report No. 2060]


Petition for Reconsideration of Actions in Rulemaking Proceedings

March 10, 1995.
    Report No. 2060, released March 6, 1995 erroneously listed the 
Docket Number as 91-113. The Docket Number is corrected as listed 
below.

Subject: Transport Rate Structure and Pricing. (CC Docket No. 91-213)
Number of Petition Field: 1

Federal Communications Commission.
William F. Caton,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-6336 Filed 3-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-M