alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEETS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND 1996 AND THE STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS FOR THE 12 MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998, 1997 AND 1996.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           2,140
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,520
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (616)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,233
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,869
<PP&E>                                          13,944
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (9,085)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  30,841
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,195
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           125
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,002
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    30,841
<SALES>                                         53,078
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                53,078
<CGS>                                           51,223
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   58,592
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    24
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   100
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 459
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,997)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,075)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,922)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,922)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.32)
        

</TABLE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2733

New Beverage Ventures:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
#### STATE v. WATTS RHODES.

(Filed 23 September, 1936.)

Intoxicating Liquor G c — Evidence held sufficient, without regard to statutory presumption, on charge of possessing whiskey for sale.

Evidence that officers found a funnel, and a number of containers, and glasses smelling of whiskey, some of which had a small quantity of whiskey in them, in different places on defendant’s premises, *is held,*sufficient to be submitted to the jury in a prosecution of defendant on a charge of having possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale, although the amount of whiskey discovered on the premises was insufficient to invoke the presumption under the provisions of C. S., 3379 (2).

*474Appeal by defendant from *Harris, I.,*at June Term, 1936, of Marten.

No error.

The defendant was charged with the possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale, and from judgment pronounced upon a verdict of guilty as charged, defendant appealed.

*Attorney-General Seawell and Assistant Attorney-General McMullan for the State.*

*II. L. Swain for defendant.*

Per Curiam.

The only assignment of error is to the refusal of the court to allow defendant’s motion for judgment as of nonsuit.

The evidence for the State was to the effect that the defendant was the proprietor of a small store, operated a pool table, and had groceries for sale; that upon a search of the premises the officers found two bottles with about a tablespoonful of whiskey and a glass jug with about a half pint of whiskey in it, two small glasses with odor of whiskey, and a small funnel with odor of whiskey. These bottles and jug were behind the counter. The glasses were on a shelf on the other side of the store. In addition, there were several fruit jars in one corner of the store which had odor of whiskey in them. Outside the back door at the end of a path about eight steps away were found six pints of whiskey, concealed in some weeds.

While the quantity of whiskey found was not sufficient to 'invoke the statutory provision making out a *prima facie*case under C. S., 3379, the various vessels in which the liquor was contained, the paraphernalia, location, and other surrounding circumstances, did constitute some evidence of the purpose and intent with which the whiskey was possessed by the defendant. As was said in *S. v. Langley,*209 N. C., 178 : “Without regard to the statutory presumption arising from the quantity of liquor in possession, under C. S., 3379 (2), . . . the facts and circumstances shown by the evidence were sufficient to justify the inference by the jury that the defendant had such liquor in his possession for sale.”

The motion for judgment as of nonsuit was properly overruled. In the trial we find

No error.
#### STATE v. OLIVER HICKS KOONE, JR.

(Filed 29 February, 1956.)

Criminal Law § 67b—

Where prayer for judgment is continued for a specified term upon conditions stipulated, there is no final judgment, and an appeal must be dismissed as premature.

Appeal by defendant from *Pless, J.,*November Term 1955, Superior Court, RutheREORD.

This criminal prosecution originated in the Recorder’s Court of Rutherford County upon a warrant charging the defendant with the *629unlawful and willful abandonment of his infant daughter and with failure and refusal to pay hospital bills incident to her birth, “and has further failed to provide adequate support for the said infant.” From a verdict of guilty and judgment thereon, the defendant appealed to the Superior Court. A jury trial in the Superior Court resulted in a verdict of guilty. The disposition in the Superior Court was as follows:

“With the consent of the defendant, prayer for judgment is continued from term to term for a period of five years upon the following conditions:

“1. (Provides for payment of $20.00 per week for the first year and $15.00 per week thereafter for support of the child.)

“2. (Provides that the defendant may visit the child at reasonable intervals.)

“The court reserves the authority to pronounce judgment or to change the amounts required to be paid for the support of said child if and when the condition of the parties shall materially change.”

The defendant excepted and appealed.

*William B. Rodman, Jr., Attorney General, and Harry W. McGal-liard, Asst. Attorney General, for the State.*

*Hamrick & Hamrick for defendant, appellant.*

Per Curiam.

The right of appeal to this Court does not arise until judgment has been pronounced in the Superior Court. Judgment has not been pronounced in this case. While this appeal is premature and must be dismissed, we have, nevertheless, examined the record. No reversible error appears.

Appeal dismissed.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2340

Reelcraft Industries:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
EXHIBIT 32
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Salisbury  Bancorp,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending  September 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
John F. Perotti,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  and I, John F. Foley,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ John F. Perotti                                /s/ John F. Foley
-------------------                                -----------------
    John F. Perotti                                    John F. Foley
    Chief Executive Officer                            Chief Financial Officer


                                       26
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 13, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3801

Knowles Corporation:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests and the 

request failed to show that this particular product is available only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2638

Datacolor, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
Exhibit 4.6

 

February 14, 2011

 

Guitar Center, Inc.
 5795 Lindero Canyon Road
 Westlake Village, California 91362 
 Attention: General Counsel

 

Re:                               Revocation of Waiver of Certain Provisions of Indenture and Exchange and Registration Rights Agreement and Amendment of Exchange and Registration Rights Agreement of $375,000,000 11.50% Senior Notes due 2015

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

Reference is made to the letter (the “Letter”), dated November 21, 2008, by Guitar Center, Inc. (the “Company”), ACOF II GC Acquisition, L.P. and ACOF Ill GC Acquisition, L.P. (together with ACOF II GC Acquisition, L.P., the “ACOF Holders”). Capitalized terms used herein but not otherwise defined shall have the respective meanings ascribed to such terms in the Letter.

 

Pursuant to the terms of the Letter, the ACOF Holders hereby revoke their waiver of the Company’s compliance with Section 4.3 of the Indenture (thereby also revoking their waiver of the Company’s compliance with Section 2 of the Registration Rights Agreement). Pursuant to the terms of the Letter, such revocation will be effective as of April 1, 2011.

 

Effective as of the date hereof and for all purposes under the Registration Rights Agreement, “Issue Date” shall mean December 31, 2010, all references to “330 days” shall be “270 days,” and all references to “360 days” shall be “300 days.” Nothing herein shall limit clause (c) under the caption “Registration Rights” in the Letter.

 

[Signature Page Follows]

 











 

Regards,

 

 

	
ACOF II GC ACQUISITION, L.P.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
ACOF II   GC Management, LLC, its General Partner
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
[illegible]
    	
 
    
	
Name:
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Title:
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
ACOF III GC Acquisition, L.P.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
by:
    	
ACOF   III  GC Management, LLC, its General   Partner
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
[illegible]
    	
 
    
	
Name:
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Title:
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Accepted and Agreed:
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Guitar Center Holdings, Inc.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
[illegible]
    	
 
    
	
Name:
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Title:
    	
 
    	
 
    
				


 

[Signature Page to Revocation of Waiver Letter - GCH]
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50243 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. JESUS AARON CANAS-BARRAZA Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:06-CR-1715-ALL Before KING, BARKSDALE, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing theJudgment in a Criminal Case, Jesus Aaron Canas-Barraza raises arguments that are foreclosed by Al mendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), whic h held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. See United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (Aug. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D November 8, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-50243

2 28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
### NU MBE R 13- 03- 0057 9-C V 

## COURT OF A PP EA LS T H I R T E E N T H D I S T R I C T O F T E X AS CORPUS CHRI ST I -E DI NBURG

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ LEN NARC ORP ORATION , ETAL ., APPEL LAN TS , v . M AR K SC H LAT T ER , E TA L. , AP PE LL EE S.

_ _ _ _ _ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ On A pp ea l from th e 10 7t h D i str i ct C ou rt of C am eron C ou nty , T exas .

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ _ 

## ME MOR A N D U M OP I N I ON B ef or e Just i ces Yañez, R odri guez, and V el a M em or andu m O pi ni on P erC ur i am A p p e l l a n t s , L e n n a r

C o r p o ra t i o n , U
. S
. H o m e C o r p o ra t io n , Da vid G a rc ia , Fa b ia n Di a z, and Sh eld on M oore, ha v e fil ed an uno p p o se d m oti on todi smi ssthi s a ppeal as moot. App ellant s request tha t this Court dism iss the ap pea l. The Co urt, hav ing co n sid e re d the doc uments on fil e and appel lan ts’ unoppo sed moti on to di smi ssthe appeal , i s o f the opini on that the motion s houl d be g ra nted. SeeT EX .2

R. A PP . P. 4 2.1( a)
. Appel lan ts’ unoppos ed moti on to dis mis s isGRAN TED, and t he appe al ishereby DISM ISSE D. Cos ts w il l be ta x ed ag ain st appel lan ts. SeeT EX . R. A PP . P. 4 2.1( d) ("A bsentag re ement of the parti es, the cour t w il l tax co stsag ain st the a ppel lan t.")
. Hav ing dis mis sed the a ppeal at appel lants’ req uest , no moti on for re hear ing w il l be ent ertai ned, and our mandate w il l is sue forthw it h.
PERC UR IAM Me moran dum Opi nio n del ivered and filed thi s t he 10t h day

of Apr il , 200 8.
<PAGE>   1

                  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements of i-STAT Corporation on Form S-8/S-3 (File No. 33-48889) and Form
S-8 (File Nos. 33-67456, 33-76152 and 33-96114) of our reports dated January 28,
1997, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements and financial
statement schedule of i-STAT Corporation as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and
for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994, which reports are included
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the reference to our firm
under the caption "Selected Consolidated Financial Data".







Princeton, New Jersey                                  Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
March 26, 1997
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 42 (Friday, March 3, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 12031]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5262]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

Advisory Committee on Former Prisoners of War, Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public 
Law 92-463 that a meeting of the Advisory Committee on Former Prisoners 
of War will be held at the Department of Veterans Affairs Central 
Office, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20420, from April 26, 
1995, through April 28, 1995. The meeting will convene at 9:00 a.m. 
each day and will be open to the public. Seating is limited and will be 
available on a first-come, first-served basis.
    The purpose of the Committee is to advise the Secretary of Veterans 
Affairs on the administration of benefits under Title 38, United States 
Code, for veterans who are former prisoners of war, and to make 
recommendations on the need of such veterans for compensation, health 
care and rehabilitation.
    The Committee will receive briefings and hold discussions on 
various issues affecting health care and benefits delivery, including, 
but not limiting to, the following: education and training of VA 
personnel involved with former prisoners of war; the status of 
privately and publicly funded research affecting former prisoners of 
war; past and current legislative issues affecting former prisoners of 
war; the various disabilities and sequelae of long-term captivity; and 
the procedures involved in processing claims for service-connected 
disabilities submitted by former prisoners of war.
    Members of the public may direct questions or submit prepared 
statements for review by the Committee in advance of the meeting, in 
writing only, to Mr. J. Gary Hickman, Director, Compensation and 
Pension Service (21), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont 
Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC, 20420. Submitted material must be 
received at least five business days prior to the meeting. Members of 
the public may be asked to clarify submitted material prior to 
consideration by the Committee.
    A report of the meeting and a roster of Committee members may be 
obtained from Mr. Hickman.

    Dated: February 24, 1995.

    By Direction of the Secretary:
Heyward Bannister,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-5262 Filed 3-2-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M