14920 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 54 / Tuesday, March 21, 1995 / Proposed Rules

is $1,000 for deductibles and cost-shares

based on allowed charges for the Basic

Program services and supplies received

in a fiscal year. For all other categories

of beneficiary families, the previous

fiscal year cap of $10,000 under P.L.

100–180 has been reduced under the

1993 Defense Authorization Act (P.L.

102–484) to $7,500. This proposed rule

implements the law which reduces the

fiscal year catastrophic other than active

duty dependents, effective for Basic

Program services and supplies received

on or after October 1, 1992.

Regulatory Procedures: OMB has

determined that this is not a significant

rule as defined by E.O. 12866.

The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)

requires that each federal agency

prepare, and make available for public

comment, a regulatory flexibility

analysis when the agency issues a

regulation which would have a

significant impact on a substantial

number of small entities.

This proposed rule would not have a

significant impact on a substantial

number of small entities. The changes

set forth in this proposed rule are minor

revisions to the existing regulation. This

proposed rule does not impose

information collection requirements on

the public under the Paperwork

Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 3501–

3511). Public comments on this

proposed rule are invited and will be

considered. A discussion of any major

issues revised as a result of public

comments will be included in issuance

of the final rule, anticipated

approximately 60 days after the end of

the comment period.

List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 199

Claims, Handicapped, Health

insurance, Military personnel.

Accordingly, 32 CFR part 199 is

proposed to be amended as follows:

PART 199—[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for part 199

is proposed to be revised as follows:

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 10 U.S.C. chapter

55.

2. Section 199.4 is proposed to be

amended in paragraph (e)(3)(i)(A)(3) by

removing the word ‘‘oral’’; by removing

and reserving paragraph (e)(4)(iii)(A); by

adding new paragraphs (c)(3)(xi)(A)(7)

and (f)(10); and by revising the first

sentence in paragraph (d)(3)(v),

paragraph (e)(4)(ii), and paragraph

(f)(2)(i)(G) to read as follows:

§ 199.4 Basic program benefits.

* * * * *

(c) * * *

(3) * * *

(xi) * * *

(A) * * *

(7) One screening of an infant to

determine the level of lead in the blood

of that infant.

* * * * *

(d) * * *

(3) * * *

(v) Ambulance. Civilian ambulance

service is covered when medically

necessary in connection with otherwise

covered services and supplies and a

covered medical condition. * * *

* * * * *

(e) * * *

(4) * * *

(ii) Authorized substance use disorder

treatment. Only those services provided

by CHAMPUS-authorized institutional

providers are covered. Such a provider

must be either an authorized hospital, or

an organized substance use disorder

treatment program in an authorized freestanding or hospital-based substance

use disorder rehabilitation facility.

Covered services consist of any or all of

the services listed below, including

chemical aversion therapy for

alcoholism. A qualified mental health

provider (physician, clinical

psychologist, clinical social worker,

psychiatric nurse specialist, (see

paragraph (c)(3)(i) of this section) shall

prescribe the particular level of

treatment. Each CHAMPUS beneficiary

is entitled to three substance use

disorder treatment benefit periods in his

or her lifetime, unless this limit is

waived pursuant to paragraph (e)(4)(v)

of this section. Unless clinically

contraindicated, the programmed use of

chemical aversion therapy is limited to

the third lifetime alcoholism benefit

period. (A benefit period begins with

the first date of covered treatment and

ends 365 days later, regardless of the

total services actually used within the

benefit period. Unused benefits cannot

be carried over to subsequent benefit

periods. Emergency and inpatient

hospital services (as described in

paragraph (e)(4)(i) of this section do not

constitute substance abuse treatment for

purposes of establishing the beginning

of a benefit period.)

* * * * *

(f) * * *

(2) * * *

(i) * * *

(G) Notwithstanding the dates

specified in paragraphs (f)(2)(i) (A) and

(B) of this section, in the case of

dependents of active duty members of

rank E–5 or above with Persian Gulf

Conflict service, dependents of service

members who were killed in the Gulf,

who died subsequent to Gulf service,

and of members who retired prior to

October 1, 1991, after having served in

the Gulf War, the deductible shall be the

amount specified in paragraph

(f)(2)(i)(A) of this section for care

rendered prior to October 1, 1991, and

the amount specified in paragraph

(f)(2)(i)(B) of this section for care

rendered after October 1, 1991.

* * * * *

(10) Catastrophic loss protection for

basic program benefits. Fiscal year

limits, or catastrophic caps, on the

amounts beneficiaries are required to

pay are established as follows:

(i) Dependents of active duty

members. The maximum family liability

is $1,000 for deductibles and cost-shares

based on allowable charges for Basic

Program services and supplies received

in a fiscal year.

(ii) All other beneficiaries. For all

other categories of beneficiary families

(including those eligible under

CHAMPVA), the fiscal year cap is

$10,000.

(iii) Payment after cap is met. After a

family has paid the maximum cost-share

and deductible amounts (dependents of

active duty members $1,000 and all

others $10,000), for a fiscal year,

CHAMPUS will pay allowable amounts

for remaining covered services through

the end of that fiscal year.

Note to paragraph (f)(2)(i)(G)(10):

Under the Defense Authorization Act for

fiscal year 1993, the cap for

beneficiaries other than dependents of

active duty members was reduced from

$10,000 to $7,500 on October 1, 1992.

The cap remains at $1,000 for

dependents of active duty members.

* * * * *

Dated: March 14, 1995.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate, OSD Federal Register Liaison

Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 95–6670 Filed 3–20–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5000–04–M

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[IL79–2–6616B; FRL–5167–8]

Approval and Promulgation of

Implementation Plans; Illinois

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (USEPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: The USEPA proposes to

approve requested revisions to the

Chicago ozone Federal Implementation

Plan as it pertains to the following

sources: General Motors Corporation,
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 54 / Tuesday, March 21, 1995 / Proposed Rules 14921

Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing

Corporation; Replogle Globes, Inc.,

Candle Corporation of America, Nalco

Chemical Company, Parisian Novelty

Company, Meyercord Corporation,

Wallace Computer Services, Inc. and

General Packaging Products, Inc. This

action lists the FIP revisions USEPA is

proposing to approve and provides an

opportunity to request a public hearing.

A detailed rationale for approving these

requests is presented in the final rules

section of this Federal Register, where

USEPA is approving the revision

requests as a direct final rule without

prior proposal because USEPA views

these as noncontroversial revisions and

anticipates no adverse comments. If no

adverse comments or requests for a

public hearing are received in response

to that direct final rule, no further

activity is contemplated in relation to

this proposed rule. If USEPA receives

adverse comments or a public hearing

request, the direct final rule will be

withdrawn. The USEPA will institute a

second comment period on this notice

only if a public hearing is requested.

Any parties interested in commenting

on this notice should do so at this time.

If a request for a public hearing is

received, USEPA will publish a notice

in the Federal Register announcing a

public hearing. The final rule on this

proposed action will address all

comments received.

DATES: Comments on this proposal must

be received by April 20, 1995. A public

hearing, if requested, will be held in

Chicago, Illinois. Requests for a public

hearing should be submitted to J. Elmer

Bortzer by April 20, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Written comments and

requests for a public hearing on this

proposed action should be addressed to:

J. Elmer Bortzer, Chief, Regulation

Development Section (AR–18J),

Environmental Protection Agency,

Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,

Chicago, Illinois 60604.

Comments should be strictly limited

to the subject matter of this proposal.

DOCKET: Pursuant to section 307(d)(1)(B)

of the Clean Air Act (Act), 42 U.S.C.

7607(d)(1)(B), this action is subject to

the procedural requirements of section

307(d). Therefore, USEPA has

established a public docket for this

action, A–94–39, which is available for

public inspection and copying between

8 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through

Friday, at the following addresses. We

recommend that you contact Fayette

Bright before visiting the Chicago

location and Rachel Romine before

visiting the Washington, D.C. location.

A reasonable fee may be charged for

copying.

The United States Environmental

Protection Agency, Region 5, Regulation

Development Branch, Eighteenth Floor,

Southeast, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,

Chicago, Illinois, 60604, (312) 886–

6069.

United States Environmental

Protection Agency, Docket No. A–94–

39, Air Docket (LE–131), Room M1500,

Waterside Mall, 401 M Street SW.,

Washington, D.C. 20460, (202) 245–

3639.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Steven Rosenthal, Regulation

Development Branch (AR–18J), U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency,

Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,

Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–6052.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For

additional information see the direct

final rule published in the rules section

of this Federal Register.

Dated: February 28, 1995.

Carol M. Browner,

Administrator.

[FR Doc. 95–6004 Filed 3–20–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–M

40 CFR Part 70

[AD–FRL–5174–4]

Title V Clean Air Act Proposed Interim

Approval of Operating Permits

Program; District of Columbia

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed interim approval.

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing interim

approval of the operating permits

program submitted by the District of

Columbia. This program was submitted

by the District for the purpose of

complying with federal requirements

which mandate that states develop, and

submit to EPA, programs for issuing

operating permits to all major stationary

sources, and to certain other sources.

The rationale for proposing interim

approval is set forth in this notice;

additional information is available at

the address indicated below. This action

is being taken in accordance with the

provisions of the Clean Air Act.

DATES: Comments on this proposed

action must be received in writing by

April 20, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Comments should be

submitted to Jennifer Abramson at the

Region III address indicated. Copies of

the District’s submittal and other

supporting information used in

developing the proposed interim

approval are available for inspection

during normal business hours at the

following location: Air, Radiation, and

Toxics Division, U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency, Region III, 841

Chestnut Building, Philadelphia, PA

19107.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jennifer M. Abramson (3AT23), Air,

Radiation and Toxics Division, U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency,

Region III, 841 Chestnut Building,

Philadelphia, PA 19107, (215) 597–

2923.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

As required under Title V of the Clean

Air Act (CAA) as amended (1990), EPA

has promulgated rules which define the

minimum elements of an approvable

state operating permits program and the

corresponding standards and

procedures by which EPA will approve,

oversee, and withdraw approval of state

operating permits programs (see 57 FR

32250 (July 21, 1992)). These rules are

codified at 40 Code of Federal

Regulations (CFR) part 70. Title V

requires states to develop, and submit to

EPA, programs for issuing these

operating permits to all major stationary

sources and to certain other sources.

The CAA requires that states develop

and submit these programs to EPA by

November 15, 1993, and that EPA act to

approve or disapprove each program

within 1 year after receiving the

submittal. EPA’s program review occurs

pursuant to section 502 of the CAA and

part 70, which together outline criteria

for approval or disapproval. Where a

program substantially, but not fully,

meets the requirements of Part 70, EPA

may grant the program interim approval

for a period of up to 2 years. If EPA has

not fully approved a program by 2 years

after the November 15, 1993 date, or by

the end of an interim program, EPA

must establish and implement a federal

operating permits program.

Following final interim approval, if

the District fails to submit a complete

corrective program for full approval by

6 months before the interim approval

period expires, EPA would start an 18-

month clock for mandatory sanctions. If

the District then failed to submit a

complete corrective program before the

expiration of that 18-month period, EPA

would be required to apply one of the

sanctions in section 179(b) of the CAA.

Such a sanction would remain in effect

until EPA determined that the District

had corrected the deficiency by

submitting a complete corrective

program. Moreover, if the Administrator

found a lack of good faith on the part

of the District, both sanctions under

section 179(b) would apply after the