alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     The schedule contains summary financial information extracted
     from the consolidated financial statements of the Holt Group, Inc.
     and subsidiaries as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2000
     and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such consolidated
     financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           7,028
<SECURITIES>                                    33,367
<RECEIVABLES>                                   91,145
<ALLOWANCES>                                    32,864
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               108,393
<PP&E>                                         331,649
<DEPRECIATION>                                 103,276
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 424,353
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          344,864
<BONDS>                                         51,250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   424,353
<SALES>                                         77,717
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                80,306
<CGS>                                           79,205
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   83,488
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,147
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (10,329)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (10,329)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (10,329)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (103.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (103.29)



</TABLE>
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed November 16, 2022

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21

- 2206

Lower Tribunal No. 20

- 16054

________________



### Emmanuela Bruno

, Appellant,

vs.



### BHUJ 1 LLC,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami

- Dade County, Beatrice

Butchko , Judge.

The Monestime Firm , P.A., and Regine Monestime , for appellant.

Arnaldo Velez, P.A., and Arnaldo Velez; Salina Jivani , for appellee.

Before LOGUE, LINDSEY, and MILLER , JJ.

PER CURIAM

.2 Appellant Emmanuela Bruno challenges several orders on

appeal. Only one is timely. In that orde r, Bruno challenges the trial court’s

denial of her objection to the judicial sale without an evidentiary

h earing. Based on the record before us, w e reverse and remand for an

evidentiary hearing. See Arsali v. Chase Home Fin. LLC , 121 So. 3d 511

(Fla. 2013).

Reversed and r emanded.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           5,046
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,575
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,847
<PP&E>                                          89,189
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 137,291
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,843
<BONDS>                                         58,207
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      57,787
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   137,291
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                40,299
<CGS>                                           21,270
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   36,339
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,431
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (404)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (62)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (342)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (476)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (818)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.14)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification Under Section 906 of the SarbanesOxley Act of 2002 / 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 / SEC Rule
13a-14(b)



Frederick Cary hereby certifies that:



1. He is the co-interim chief executive officer of Path 1
Network Technologies Inc.



2. The Form 10-Q
report of Path 1 Network Technologies Inc. that this certification accompanies fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



3. The information contained in the Form 10-Q report of Path 1 Network Technologies Inc. that this
certification accompanies fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Path 1 Network Technologies Inc.



Dated: November 14, 2005



|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|                                      
|/s/ Frederick Cary                    
|Frederick Cary                        
|Co-Interim Principal Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 47 (Friday, March 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13167-13168]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5847]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[WY-989-1050-00-P]


Filing of Plats of Survey; Wyoming

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The plats of survey of the following described lands are 
scheduled [[Page 13168]] to be officially filed in the Wyoming State 
Office, Cheyenne, Wyoming, thirty (30) calendar days from the date of 
this publication.

Sixth Principal Meridian, Wyoming

T. 50 N., R. 73 W., accepted February 15, 1995
T. 51 N., R. 73 W., accepted February 14, 1995

    If protests against a survey, as shown on any of the above plats, 
are received prior to the official filing, the filing will be stayed 
pending consideration of the protest(s) and or appeal(s). A plat will 
not be officially filed until after disposition of protests(s) and or 
appeal(s). These plats will be placed in the open files of the Wyoming 
State Office, Bureau of Land Management, 2515 Warren Ave., Cheyenne, 
Wyoming, and will be available to the public as a matter of information 
only. Copies of the plats will be made available upon request and 
prepayment of the reproduction fee of $1.10 per copy.
    A person or party who wishes to protest a survey must file with the 
State Director, Bureau of Land Management, Cheyenne, Wyoming, a notice 
of protest prior to thirty (30) calendar days from the date of this 
publication. If the protest notice did not include a statement of 
reasons for the protest, the protestant shall file such a statement 
with the State Director within thirty (30) calendar days after the 
notice of protest was filed.
    The above-listed plats represent dependent resurveys, subdivision 
of sections.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bureau of Land Management, P.O. Box 1828, 2515 Warren Avenue, Cheyenne, 
Wyoming 82003.

    Dated: March 1, 1995.
John P. Lee,
Chief Branch of Cadastral Survey.
[FR Doc. 95-5847 Filed 3-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-M
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1







                           METRETEK TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

                                  SUBSIDIARIES



SUBSIDIARIES OF METRETEK TECHNOLOGIES, INC.:

            Southern Flow Companies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (100%)
            Metretek, Incorporated, a Florida corporation (100%)
            PowerSecure, Inc., a Delaware corporation (100%)
            PowerSpring, Inc. a Delaware corporation (82.5%)
            Marcum Gas Transmission, Inc., a Colorado corporation (100%)
            Marcum Denver, Inc., a Colorado corporation (100%)

WHOLLY-OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF MARCUM GAS TRANSMISSION, INC.:

            Marcum Capital Resources, Inc., a Colorado corporation

WHOLLY-OWNED SUBSIDIARIES OF METRETEK, INCORPORATED:

            Metretek Europe Limited, a company organized and existing under the
            laws of Great Britain
            Sigma VI, Inc., a Florida corporation

WHOLLY-OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF POWERSPRING, INC.:

            Mercator Energy Incorporated, a Colorado corporation
##### 



Exhibit 99.1
 
 Contact: Fred MinturnFOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
    
    MSX InternationalDATE: May 16, 2006
    
    248-829-6263fminturn@msxi.com
 MSX International, Inc. announces financial results for the first quarter of fiscal 2006
 WARREN, Mich., May 16, 2006




---



##### 



http://www.msxi.com




---



##### 



MSX INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)  for the fiscal quarters ended April 2, 2006 and April 3, 2005
 Fiscal Quarter EndedApril 2,
    
    
    April 3,2006
    
    
    2005(in thousands)Net sales
    
    $
    88,620
    
    
    $
    101,089Cost of sales
    
    
    72,862
    
    
    
    84,594Gross profit
    
    
    15,758
    
    
    
    16,495Selling, general and administrative expenses
    
    
    6,800
    
    
    
    8,514Restructuring and severance costs
    
    
    183
    
    
    
    126Income from continuing operations before
interest and income taxes
    
    
    8,775
    
    
    
    7,855Interest expense, net
    
    
    7,645
    
    
    
    8,504Income (loss) from continuing operations before
income taxes
    
    
    1,130
    
    
    
    (649
    )Income tax provision
    
    
    1,651
    
    
    
    1,240Loss from continuing operations
    
    
    (521
    )
    
    
    (1,889
    )Income (loss) from discontinued operations,
net of taxes
    
    
    1,275
    
    
    
    (12,947
    )Net income (loss)
    
    
    754
    
    
    
    (14,836
    )Accretion for redemption of preferred stock
    
    
    (3,069
    )
    
    
    (2,732
    )Net loss available to common shareholders
    
    $
    (2,315
    )
    
    $
    (17,568
    )




---



##### 



MSX INTERNATIONAL, INC.
SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION  for the fiscal quarters ended April 2, 2006 and April 3, 2005
 Fiscal Quarter EndedApril 2,
    
    
    April 3,2006
    
    
    2005(in thousands)Net sales from continuing operations
    
    $
    88,620
    
    
    $
    101,089Reconciliation of EBITDA:Income from continuing operations before interest
and income taxes
    
    $
    8,775
    
    
    $
    7,855Michigan Single Business and similar taxes
    
    
    344
    
    
    
    510EBIT, as defined
    
    
    9,119
    
    
    
    8,365Depreciation
    
    
    739
    
    
    
    1,201Restructuring and severance costs
    
    
    183
    
    
    
    126EBITDA before restructuring and severance costs,
as defined
    
    $
    10,041
    
    
    $
    9,692
EXHIBIT 10.1


                                  Statement of
                 The StoneStreet Group, Inc. and Alan Barksdale
                                      as to
                        the Joint Filing of Schedule 13D



We, the Undersigned,  hereby consent to the joint filing with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  ("SEC") of the  Schedule  13D,  dated June 22, 2011 on our
behalf by The StoneStreet Group, Inc.


Date:  June 22, 2011



                                              THE STONESTREET GROUP, INC.




                                              /s/ Alan Barksdale
                                               ---------------------------------
                                              Alan Barksdale, President


                                              ALAN BARKSDALE



                                              /s/ Alan Barksdale
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Alan Barksdale, Individually
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 23

- 00012

- CR

X AVIER P ATTERSON

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On A ppeal from the 211th District Court

of Denton County ( F20

- 962

- 431 )

March 21, 2024

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Womack

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’ s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Dana Womack

Justice Dana Womack
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

October 18, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-1868

Lantec Products Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
Exhibit No. 99

UNITED RETAIL GROUP, INC.
SCHEDULE II - VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
FOR EACH OF THE THREE FISCAL YEARS IN THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 2004
(in thousands)

|                              | Balance atBeginningPeriod | AdditionsCharged toIncome | Adjustmentsand/orDeductions | Balance atEnd ofPeriod
|----------------------------- | ------------------------- | ------------------------- | --------------------------- | ----------------------
|Sales Returns                 |                           |                           |                             |                       
|                              |                           |                           |                             |                       
|January 31, 2004              | $114                      | $1,522                    | ($1,024)                    | $612                  
|February 1, 2003              | $114                      | $1,666                    | ($1,666)                    | $114                  
|February 2, 2002              | $186                      | $2,566                    | ($2,638)                    | $114                  
|                              |                           |                           |                             |                       
|Inventory valuation allowance |                           |                           |                             |                       
|                              |                           |                           |                             |                       
|January 31, 2004              | $1,543                    | $2,448                    | ($3,009)                    | $982                  
|February 1, 2003              | $1,586                    | $3,673                    | ($3,716)                    | $1,543                
|February 2, 2002              | $799                      | $2,860                    | ($2,073)                    | $1,586                

---

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmonFinancial Statement Schedule

To the Board of Directorsof United Retail Group, Inc.:

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements referred to in our report dated February 20, 2004, except for
Note 2, as to which the date is February 15, 2005 (which report and consolidated financial statements appear in
Item 8 to this Form 10-K/A), also included an audit of the financial statement schedule listed in Item 15(a)(2)
of this Form 10-K/A.  In our opinion, this financial statement schedule presents fairly, in all material
respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial
statements.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

New York, New York
February 20, 2004, except for Note 2, as to which the date is February 15, 2005
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 33-49758, 33-85744, 333-07541, 333-85131, 333-65812, 333-84356, 333-102185, 333-112815 and 333-131703 on Form S-8 and Nos. 333-69999, 333-53484 and 333-98475 on Form S-3 of  our report dated June 13, 2005 relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule of Abaxis, Inc. for the years ended March 31, 2005 and 2004  appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Abaxis, Inc. for the year ended March 31, 2006.

| /s/ DELOITTE   & TOUCHE LLP |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|
|                                 |   |
| San Jose, California            |   |
|                            |   |
| June 13, 2006                   |   |
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

		NO. 2-03-101-CV

CHRISTOPHER A. FAULKNER	APPELLANTS

AND CI HOST, INC.

	V.

ERIN L. BULLOCK	APPELLEE

	------------

	FROM THE 17TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	We have considered “Appellants’ Motion To Dismiss Appeal.”  It is the court's opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

	Costs of this appeal shall be taxed against the party incurring same, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM	

PANEL D:	HOLMAN, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: July 3, 2003
#### A. L. PENDLETON, Trading Under the Firm Name of STANDARD DRUG COMPANY, v. J. A. SPENCER et al.

(Filed 20 September, 1933.)

1. Evidence D a—

Where an action on a note is resisted by defendant solely on tbe ground that bis name was forged on tbe note, evidence offered by him relating to consideration for tbe note is properly excluded as being irrelevant to tbe issue.

a. Appeal and Error J g—

Where testimony of transactions or communication with a decedent is properly excluded as irrelevant to tbe issue, its competency or in-eompetency under C. S., 1795 will not be determined on appeal.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Oowp&r, Special*Judge, at May Term, 1933, of PASQUOTANK.

Civil action to recover on a promissory note alleged to have been executed by J. A. Spencer, G. F. Spencer and A. S. Hudgins.

The executors of the estate of A. S. Hudgins, deceased, and G. F. Spencer interposed a plea of *non esl factum*and alleged that the signatures purporting to bind them were forgeries.

Judgment by default final was rendered against J. A. Spencer for want of an answer, or defense, by the clerk of the Superior Court on 14 March, 1932.

Later, on the trial, J. A. Spencer was offered as a witness to prove the consideration of the note. This was excluded. Plaintiff excepts.

*180The jury returned the following verdict:

“1. Was the note sued on signed by the defendant G-. E. Spencer as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes.

“2. Was the note sued on signed by A. S. Hudgins, now deceased, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: No.”

From a judgment on the verdict, plaintiff appeals, assigning error in the exclusion of J. A. Spencer’s testimony as to the defendants’ executors.

*L&Roy & Meelcins for plaintiff.*

*A. P. Godwin and McMullan & McMullan for defendants executors.*

Stacy, C. J.

The testimony of J". A. Spencer was properly excluded as the consideration for the note was not in issue.

Therefore, the applicability or nonapplicability of C. S., 1795, to the proffered testimony is not necessarily presented by the record. Its competency is urged under authority of *Sutton v. Walters,*118 N. C., 495, 24 S. E., 357. Its incompetency is asserted under authority of *Benedict v. Jones,*129 N. C., 475, 40 S. E., 223. The point is moot as the testimony was properly excluded on other grounds.

No error.
exhibit4r.htm




Exhibit 4(r)

Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York







Contract Endorsement







This Contract Endorsement is made part of the policy to which it is attached. It is attached to and becomes effective as of the Contract Date. In the event of a conflict between this Contract Endorsement and any other provision of the Contract, the Contract Endorsement will control.












Pursuant to Section 3 of the federal Defense of Marriage Act ("DOMA"), same-sex marriages currently are not recognized for purposes of federal law. Therefore, the favorable income-deferral options afforded by federal tax law to an opposite-sex spouse under Internal Revenue Code sections 72(s) and 401(a)(9) are currently NOT available to a same-sex spouse. Same-sex spouses who own or are considering the purchase of annuity products that provide benefits based upon status as a spouse should consult a tax advisor. To the extent that an annuity contract or certificate accords to spouses other rights or benefits that are not affected by DOMA, same-sex spouses remain entitled to such rights or benefits to the same extent as any annuity holder's spouse.












Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York

















AR-514 (5-10)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RYAN BAUMGARDNER,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 92 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 14th day of August, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.