alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-1920

Northern Tool & Equipment:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests. 

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Exhibit 10.2


           Consent of Independent Accountants for the Corporation


                     CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-44868, 33-47407, 33-48500, 33-48501,
33-364643 and 33-67288) of United Retail Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries of
our report dated February 16, 2001, relating to the financial statements,
which appears in this Form 10-K. We also consent to the reference to us
under the heading "Selected Financial Data" which appears in this Form 10-K.




PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP



New York, New York
March 15, 2001
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 47 (Friday, March 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 13182]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5915]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[NAFTA-00352, 00352A]


Washington Public Power Supply System Nuclear Project, SATSOP, 
and Richland, WA; Notice of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Title V of the North American Free Trade Agreement 
Implementation Act (P.L. 103-182) concerning transitional adjustment 
assistance, hereinafter called (NAFTA-TAA), and in accordance with 
Section 250(a), Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title II, of the Trade Act of 
1974, as amended (19 USC 2273), an investigation was initiated on 
January 27, 1995 in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers 
at Washington Public Power Supply WNP-1 located in Richland and WNP-3 
located in Satsop, Washington. The investigation revealed that workers 
of Washington Public Power Supply were certified on January 13, 1995, 
based on increased imports of articles like or directly competitive and 
contributed importantly to the declines in sales and production and to 
total or partial separation of workers at the affiliated companies. On 
February 21, 1995 an amendment was made to NAFTA-TAA-00302 to include 
all workers of Washington Public Power Supply WNP-1 located in Richland 
and WNP-3 located in Satsop, Washington. Because the subject workers at 
WNP-1 and WNP-3 have been included in the amendment certification of 
NAFTA-TAA-00302, further investigation in this case would serve no 
purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, D.C., this 24th day of February 1995.
Victor J. Trunzo,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 95-5915 Filed 3-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Filed 7/13/99 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

1999 ND 123

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

William Lee Miller, Defendant and Appellant

No. 990022

Appeal from the District Court of Morton County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Thomas J. Schneider, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Brian D. Grosinger, Assistant State’s Attorney, 210 2nd Avenue N.W., Mandan, ND 58554, for plaintiff and appellee.

Chad R. McCabe (argued) and Ralph A. Vinje (on brief), Vinje Law Firm, 523 North 4th Street, Bismarck, ND 58501, for defendant and appellant.

State v. Miller

No. 990022

Per Curiam.

[¶1]William Lee Miller appealed from a criminal judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of class C felony terrorizing in violation of N.D.C.C. § 12.1-17-04.  Miller’s sole argument on appeal is there was insufficient evidence to support the conviction.  We disagree; we affirm the judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Dale V. Sandstrom

William A. Neumann

Mary Muehlen Maring
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2415

Amistco Separation Products dba AMACS:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
# OS-I/-O~3



# -{!/_ RECEXVED court of Appeals



## AUG 2 3 

## Z013 Lisa Matz Clerk, Sth 

### District



# IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NOS. PD-1626-12 & 

### 1627-12 MARCUS JAMERSON, Appellant 

### v. STATE OF TEXAS ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS COUNTY Per curiam. 

### OPINION 

### Appellant was convicted oftwo counts of aggravated robbery and sentenced to 32 years inprison. He appealed, arguing thathehadbeen deniedhis rightto confrontation when the technical reviewer, rather than the analyst who performed his DNA test, testified at trial about the test results. The Court ofAppeals affirmed the conviction, concluding that theJAMERSON- 2 technical reviewer's testimony did notviolate the Confrontation Clause. 

### Jamerson v. State, l,•;l_ 383 S.W.3d 309 (Tex. App.- Dallas 2012). Appellant has filed a petition for discretionary review ofthis decision. Werecently addressed this issue in 

### Burch v. State, No. PD-0943-12, 2013 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 945 (Tex. Crim. App. June 26, 2013) . In 

### Burch, we held that the Confrontation Clause was violated by the admission of a drug analysis when the reviewing analyst, rather than the testing analyst, testified at trial. In that case, the person who testified did not participate in the testing or witness the tests being performed. The Court ofAppeals in the instant case did not have the benefit of our opinion in 

### Burch. Accordingly, we grant Appellant's petition for discretionary review, vacate the judgment ofthe Court ofAppeals, and remand this case to the Court ofAppeals in light of 

### Burch.

DATE DELIVERED: August21, 2013 PUBLISH
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 51 (Thursday, March 16, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 14306]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6538]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Federal Networking Council Advisory Committee

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Public Law 
92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Federal Networking Council Advisory Committee (#1177).
    Date and Time: April 4, 1995, 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. and April 
5, 1995; 9:00 am. to 1:00 p.m.
    Place: Room 375, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., 
Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: Mr. Scott Behnke, Coordinator, Federal 
Networking Council, DynCorpATS, 4001 N. Fairfax Drive, Suite 200, 
Arlington, VA 22203-1614, Telephone: (703) 522-6410, Fax: (703) 522-
7161. Internet: [email protected].
    Purpose of Meeting: The purpose of this meeting is for the 
Advisory Committee to provide the Federal Networking Council (FNC) 
with technical, tactical, and strategic advice, concerning policies 
and issues raised in the implementation and deployment of the 
National Research and Education Network (NREN) Program.
    Agenda: FNC/IITF Relationship, Federal Internet Umbrella 
Security Plan, International Networking, Education.
    Luncheon: There is no fee to attend this meeting. However, 
attendees who register in advance may order refreshments and/or a 
box lunch for which there will be a charge. To obtain registration 
form, contact Mr. Behnke by telephone, fax, or electronic mail at 
the numbers above. Forms are requested by March 29, 1995.

    Dated: March 13, 1995.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-6538 Filed 3-15-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
```
#### STATE v. LEWIS DOYLE.

(Filed 4 March, 1931.)

Appeal by defendant from *Granmer, J.,*at January Term, 1931, of Halifax.

Criminal prosecution tried upon an indictment charging the defendant with carnal knowledge of a virtuous female child, over twelve and under sixteen years of age, contrary to the provisions of O. S., 4209.

Verdict: Guilty.

Judgment: Imprisonment in the State’s prison at hard labor for a term of four years.

The defendant appeals, assigning errors.

*Attorney-General Brwmmitt and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.*

*George G. Gi’&en for defendant.*

*801Per Ouriam.

Two errors are assigned by tbe defendant on bis appeal to tbis Court, neither of wbieb can be sustained. It would serve no useful purpose to set out tbe evidence or to discuss tbe exceptions.

Tbe verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 7, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-41220

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LUCIANO PALENCIA-CONTRERAS,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 1:06-CR-224-ALL

--------------------

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Luciano PalenciaContreras raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held

that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a

separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary

affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 48 (Monday, March 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 13431]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6038]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-199-000]


NorAm Gas Transmission Co.: Notice of Filing

March 7, 1995.
    Take notice that on March 2, 1995, NorAm Gas Transmission Company 
(NGT) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Fourth 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheets, with a 
proposed effective date of April 1, 1995:

Second Revised Sheet No. 13

    NGT states that these tariff sheets are filed in compliance with 
Section 5.7(c) (ii) (2) (B), Second Revised Sheet Nos. 214 and 215 of 
NGT's tariff.
    Pursuant to said tariff provision, the proposed tariff sheets 
adjust NGT's cashout balancing revenue credit for the period October 
through December 1994.
    Any person desiring to be heard or protest said filing should file 
a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 214 and 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214, 385.211). All such motions or protests 
should be filed on or before March 14, 1995. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-6038 Filed 3-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 49 (Tuesday, March 14, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 13778]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6324]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD

TIME AND PLACE: 9:30 a.m., Tuesday, March 21, 1995.

PLACE: The Board Room, 5th Floor, 490 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, 
DC 20594.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

6420A  Railroad Accident Report: Collision and Derailment of Amtrak 
Train 87 With An Intermodal Trailer Carried on CSXT Train 176 at 
Selma, North Carolina, May 16, 1994
6503A  Briefs of Aviation Accidents: Two Briefs Previously Sent to 
the Board for Approval--Talladega, Alabama and Hohenwald, Tennessee

NEWS MEDIA CONTACT: Telephone: (202) 382-0660.

FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT: Bea Hardesty, (202) 382-6525.

    Dated: March 10, 1995.
Bea Hardesty,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-6324 Filed 3-10-95; 10:01 am]
BILLING CODE 7533-01-P
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH 

NO. 02-15-00431-CR 

Derrick Cash Smith 

v. 

The State of Texas 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

From County Criminal Court No. 2 

of Denton County (CR-2014-06227-B) 

June 30, 2016 

Opinion by Justice Dauphinot 

(nfp) 

JUDGMENT 

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _/s/ Lee Ann Dauphinot______________ 

 Justice Lee Ann Dauphinot
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2125

Primex Family of Companies:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Lincare Holdings Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul G. Gabos, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ PAUL G. GABOSPaul G. Gabos Chief Financial Officer


February 25, 2010
EX-10.2





 Exhibit 10.2 

LIV Capital Acquisition Corp. II 

Torre Virreyes, Pedregal No. 24, Piso 6-601 

Col. Molino del Rey México, CDMX, C.P. 11040 

February 7, 2022 
 Ladies and Gentlemen: 

This letter will confirm our agreement that, commencing on the effective date (the “Effective Date”) of the registration
statement (the “Registration Statement”) for the initial public offering (the “IPO”) of the securities of LIV Capital Acquisition Corp. II (the “Company”)
and continuing until the earlier of (i) the consummation by the Company of an initial business combination and (ii) the Company’s liquidation (in each case as described in the Registration Statement) (such earlier date hereinafter
referred to as the “Termination Date”), LIV Capital Acquisition Sponsor II, L.P. shall make available to the Company certain office space and administrative and support services as may be required by the Company from
time to time. In exchange therefore, the Company shall pay LIV Capital Acquisition Sponsor II, L.P. up to $10,000 on the Effective Date and continuing monthly thereafter until the Termination Date. 

LIV Capital Acquisition Sponsor II, L.P. hereby agrees that it does not have any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies that may be
set aside in a trust account (the “Trust Account”) that may be established upon the consummation of the IPO and will not seek recourse against the Trust Account for any reason whatsoever. 

This agreement may not be amended, modified or waived as to any particular provision, except by a written instrument executed by the parties hereto. 

No party hereto may assign this agreement or any rights, interests or contracted obligations hereunder without the prior written approval of the other party.
Any purported assignment in violation of this paragraph shall be void and ineffectual and shall not operate to transfer or assign any interest or title to the purported assignee. 

This agreement shall be governed by, construed in accordance with, and interpreted pursuant to the laws of the State of New York, without giving effect to its
choice of law principles. 
  

					
	Very truly yours,
	LIV Capital Acquisition Corp. II
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Alexander R. Rossi

		 	Name:	 	Alexander R. Rossi
		 	Title:	 	Chief Executive Officer and Chairman


  

					
	AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:
	LIV Capital Acquisition Sponsor II, L.P.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Humberto Zesati

		 	Name:	 	Humberto Zesati
		 	Title:	 	Managing Partner

 [Signature page to Administrative Services Agreement]