alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1856

HONG LIN,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A96-354-847)

Submitted: January 9, 2006 Decided: January 31, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied in part and dismissed in part by unpublished per

curiam opinion.

Hong Lin, Petitioner Pro Se. James Arthur Hunolt, Michele Yvette

Francis Sarko, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Wanda Evans, Daniel Eric

Goldman, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT

OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; Javier E. Balasquide, Chief Counsel,

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, Arlington, Virginia, for

Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*

Lin has waived any challenge to the Board’s denial of relief

under the Convention Against Torture by failing to raise the issue

in his informal brief. See Ngarurih v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 182, 189

n.7 (4th Cir. 2004) (citing Yousefi v. INS, 260 F.3d 318, 326 (4th

Cir. 2001)); see also 4th Cir. R. 34(b).

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Hong Lin, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic

of China, petitions for review of an order of the Board of

Immigration Appeals (“Board”) adopting and affirming the

immigration judge’s order denying his applications for asylum,

withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against

Torture.*

 We deny his petition.

Lin seeks to challenge the Board’s finding that he failed

to file his asylum application within one year of the date of his

arrival in the United States. See 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(2)(B) (2000).

We conclude we lack jurisdiction to review this determination

pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(3) (2000). See Zaidi v. Ashcroft,

377 F.3d 678, 680-81 (7th Cir. 2004) (collecting cases). Given

this jurisdictional bar, we cannot review the underlying merits of

Lin’s asylum claim.

While we lack jurisdiction to consider the Board’s ruling

on the asylum claim, we retain jurisdiction to consider the denial

of Lin’s request for withholding of removal. See 8 C.F.R.

§ 1208.4(a) (2005). “To qualify for withholding of removal, a

petitioner must show that he faces a clear probability of

persecution because of his race, religion, nationality, membership
- 3 -

in a particular social group, or political opinion.” Rusu v. INS,

296 F.3d 316, 324 n.13 (4th Cir. 2002) (citing INS v. Stevic, 467

U.S. 407, 430 (1984)). Based on our review of the record, we find

that substantial evidence supports the Board’s holding that Lin

failed to meet this standard. 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We also

deny Lin’s application to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

 PETITION DENIED IN PART

 AND DISMISSED IN PART
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET DATED DEC. 31, 1999 AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE TWELVE MONTH
PERIOD ENDING DEC. 31, 1999 FOUND ON PAGES 18 AND 19 OF THE COMPANY'S 10-KSB FOR
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000882692
<NAME>                        recordLab Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1000

<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                            198
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      63
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                        38
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  311
<PP&E>                                          1,486
<DEPRECIATION>                                  1,010
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  1,233
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           3,237
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       25,121
<OTHER-SE>                                          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    1,233
<SALES>                                           574
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  574
<CGS>                                             277
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   5,214
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   36
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1,317
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,251)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,251)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.67)



</TABLE>
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 National Clonal Germplasm Repository: Corvallis, OR
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Plant Collections
                        Home
                                    Plant Collecting Expeditions
                                    Germplasm CGC Reports
                                    GRIN-Global
                                    Outreach
                                    Documents
                    USDASearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Corvallis, Oregon National Clonal Germplasm Repository Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Research Projects Subjects of Investigation at this LocationEach ARS research project has related subjects of investigation.  Listed below are the subjects of investigation currently conducted at this location.
Clicking on a subject of investigation will list the research projects within that  subject of investigation.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE 
SHEET, STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS INCLUDED IN THE 
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDING DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED 
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. 
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          26,052
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,602
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,107
<PP&E>                                           7,588
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,433
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  33,289
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,042
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            37
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,835
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    33,289
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,254
<CGS>                                              125
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      125
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,198
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 438
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,369
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,948
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,421
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,421
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Forms S-3 (No. 333-106608, No. 333-108924, No. 333-10754, No. 333-110752, No.
333-82496, No. 333-91225, No. 333-91235 and No. 333-17105) and Forms S-8 (No.
333-109595 and No. 33-82410) of SpatiaLight, Inc. of our reports dated March 2,
2005 relating to the consolidated financial statements of SpatiaLight, Inc.,
SpatiaLight, Inc. management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting of SpatiaLight, Inc., included in this Annual Report on Form
10-K/A Amendment No. 2 for the year ended December 31, 2004.


/s/ ODENBERG, ULLAKKO, MURANISHI & CO. LLP

San Francisco, California
April 26, 2005
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ADEWALE ONI
, Appellant,

v.

WILMINGTON TRUST, N.A

. , et al., Appellee

.

No. 4D 22

- 1522

[ May 25, 2023 ]

Appeal from the C ircuit Court for the Seven teenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Andrea Gundersen

, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE 15

- 14412

.

Ovide Val of Law Office of Ovide Val, North Miami Beach, and Nashid Sabir of BLU Ocean Law Group, Miami, for appellant.

Amber Kourofsky of Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP, Atlanta, GA, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

C IKLIN
, G ERBER and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuantto18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Inconnection with the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of Hard Rock Hotel, Inc. (the “Company”) for thequarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Peter A. Morton, as ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, and James D. Bowen, as Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ Peter A. Morton            |   |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Name: Peter A. Morton          |   |   |
| Title: Chief Executive Officer |   |   |
| Date: August 14, 2006     |   |   |
|                           |   |   |
| /s/ James D. Bowen             |   |   |
| Name: James D. Bowen           |   |   |
| Title: Chief Financial Officer |   |   |
| Date: August 14, 2006     |   |   |

 

Thiscertification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

----
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2516

Reelcraft Industries:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
CERTIFICATIONS

I, Carl Pahapill, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Next Generation
Technology Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date.

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: September 12, 2003

                                         BY:  /S/ CARL PAHAPILL
                                         ------------------------------
                                         NAME: CARL PAHAPILL
                                         TITLE: CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-10424

BMS Bearings, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
#### CHARLES D. SANGER, JR., Trustee, v. ROBERT LEE GATTIS.

(Filed 15 April, 1942.)

Trial § 47—

Evidence which is merely cumulative or corroborative of the evidence offered by the party at the trial is insufficient to invoice the discretionary power of the court to order a new trial for newly discovered evidence, and the granting of the motion will be held for error.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Carr, J.,*at February Term, 1942, of Wake.

Civil action by trustee in bankruptcy to remove cloud on title to lands belonging to the bankrupt.

Upon denial of title, the action was converted into one of ejectment, the case depending on an alleged mistake in the drafting of a deed in 1916 to the *locus in quo.*

The jury answered in favor of the plaintiff.

During the term and before judgment, the defendant made application for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. The motion was allowed, and plaintiff appeals.

*W. C. Harris, Jr., for plaintiff, appellant.*

*John W. Hinsdale for defendant, appellee.*

*204Stacy, C. J.

The only question for decision is whether the applicant for new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence has made sufficient showing to invoke a discretionary ruling in his behalf. 'The record suggests a negative answer. *Bullock v. Williams,*213 N. C., 320, 195 S. E., 791; *Crane v. Carswell,*204 N. C., 571, 169 S. E., 160.

The “newly discovered evidence” fails to go to the heart of the case, to wit, the alleged mistake in drafting the deed of 22 June, 1916. It seems to be merely cumulative or corroborative of the evidence offered by the defendant at the trial. This was insufficient to invoke the aid of the court. *Stilley v. Planing Mills,*161 N. C., 517, 77 S. E., 760. The order granting a new trial will be stricken out.

Error.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-11460

Legrand North & Central America:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel