alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-1937

SAR Communications, LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
Order entered February 18, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01278-CR

MIGUEL ALBERTO GUTIERREZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 196th District Court

Hunt County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 27,326

ORDER

The court reporter initially filed a reporter’s record that omitted the exhibits offered at 

trial. Consequently, on November 21, 2013, we ordered the court reporter to file, within ten days 

of the date of that order, a supplemental record containing the trial exhibits. On December 4, 

2013, the court reporter filed a supplemental record containing some of the exhibits offered at 

trial. However, the supplemental record did not contain State’s exhibit 1A or State’s exhibit 21. 

On January 29, 2014, we ordered the court reporter to file the missing exhibits, which she did. It 

has come to our attention that State’s exhibit 15A, “Suspect Interview,” also was not included in 

the record. Additionally, testimony in the record suggests State’s exhibit 13, “copy of year book 

photos” might be incomplete. Consequently, we ORDER the court reporter to file, within five
days of the date of this order, a supplemental record containing State’s exhibit 15A and any 

pages from State’s exhibit 13 that may have been omitted.

/Lana Myers/

LANA MYERS

PRESIDING JUSTICE
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-11509

Wanhua Chemical US Operations, LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 50 (Wednesday, March 15, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 13987]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6349]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Norton Capital Corporation, et al.; Formations of; Acquisitions 
by; and Mergers of Bank Holding Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied for the Board's 
approval under section 3 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 
1842) and Sec.  225.14 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.14) to 
become a bank holding company or to acquire a bank or bank holding 
company. The factors that are considered in acting on the applications 
are set forth in section 3(c) of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Each application is available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. Once the application has been accepted 
for processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing to the Reserve Bank or to the offices of the Board of 
Governors. Any comment on an application that requests a hearing must 
include a statement of why a written presentation would not suffice in 
lieu of a hearing, identifying specifically any questions of fact that 
are in dispute and summarizing the evidence that would be presented at 
a hearing.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received not later than April 7, 1995.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (James A. Bluemle, Vice 
President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690:
    1. Norton Capital Corporation, Morris, Illinois; to merge with 
Sheridan Bancorp, Inc., Sheridan, Illinois, and thereby indirectly 
acquire Sheridan State Bank, Sheridan, Illinois.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Randall C. Sumner, Vice 
President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166:
    1. Mercantile Bancorporation, Inc., St. Louis, Missouri; to acquire 
100 percent of the voting shares of Mercantile Bank of Lebanon, 
Lebanon, Missouri, a de novo bank.
    C. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (James M. Lyon, Vice 
President) 250 Marquette Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480:
    1. Norwest Corporation, Minneapolis, Minnesota; to acquire 100 
percent of the voting shares of Norwest Bank Grand Forks, N.A., Grand 
Forks, North Dakota, a de novo bank.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 9, 1995.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-6349 Filed 3-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-1698

Brooks Instrument LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXHIBIT 32.3

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of SteelCloud, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Kevin Murphy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company for  the periods presented
therein.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|June 10, 2005 |  | By: /s/ Kevin MurphyName: Kevin MurphyTitle: Chief Financial Officer
|------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-11607

NewCNCRouter.com, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXHIBIT 99.2




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In  connection  with the  annual  report of Apria  Healthcare  Group  Inc.  (the
"company" or "Apria") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed
with the SEC on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  James  E.  Baker,  Chief
Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of  operations  of the
       Company.


/s/ JAMES E. BAKER
------------------------------------
James E. Baker
Chief Financial Officer
March 31, 2003



A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Apria and will be retained by Apria and furnished to the  Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 23.1

[ KPMG LETTERHEAD]


                           INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Corvas International, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
33-45607) on Form S-8, as amended, of Corvas International, Inc. of our report
dated February 6, 1998, relating to the balance sheets of Corvas International,
Inc. as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the related statements of operations,
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 1997, which report appears in the December 31, 1997
annual report on Form 10-K of Corvas International, Inc.  We also consent to the
reference to our firm under the heading "Selected Financial Data" in the Form
10-K.


                                                  KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP
San Diego, California
March 27, 1998
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains notices of meetings published under

the ‘‘Government in the Sunshine Act’’ (Pub.

L. 94-409) 5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3).

Sunshine Act Meetings Federal Register

10149

Vol. 60, No. 36

Thursday, February 23, 1995

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

DATE AND TIME: Tuesday, February 28,

1995 at 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: 999 E Street, N.W., Washington,

D.C.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to

the public.

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:

Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C.

§ 437g.

Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C.

§ 437g, § 438(b), and Title 26, U.S.C.

Matters concerning participation in civil

actions or proceedings or arbitration.

Internal personnel rules and procedures or

matters affecting a particular employee.

DATE AND TIME: Thursday, March 2, 1995

at 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: 999 E Street, N.W., Washington,

D.C. (Ninth Floor.)

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to

the public.

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:

Correction and approval of Minutes.

Advisory Opinion 1994–36: Susan M. Frank

on behalf of Science Applications

International Corporation (SAIC).

Advisory Opinion 1995–05: Gregory

Galassini on behalf of the 14th District

TRIM Committee.

Administrative Matters.

DATE AND TIME: Thursday, March 2, 1995

at 2:00 p.m.

PLACE: 999 E Street, N.W., Washington,

D.C. (Ninth Floor.)

STATUS: This oral hearing will be open

to the public.

MATTER BEFORE THE COMMISSION:

Buchanan for President, Inc.—Oral

Hearing.

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION:

Mr. Ron Harris, Press Officer,

Telephone: (202) 219–4155.

Delores Hardy,

Administrative Assistant.

[FR Doc. 95–4635 Filed 2–21–95; 3:25 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715–01–M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 45 (Wednesday, March 8, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 12744]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5678]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Native American Business Development Center Applications: New 
Mexico

AGENCY: Minority Business Development Agency, Commerce.

ACTION: Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On page 9665, in the issue dated February 21, 1995, third 
column, second paragraph, the closing date for applications is 
corrected to read March 24, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT: Demetrice Jenkins at (214) 767-8001.

11.801  Native American Program

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance)

    Dated: March 3, 1995.
Donald L. Powers,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, Minority Business Development Agency.
[FR Doc. 95-5678 Filed 3-7-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-21-P
LETTER OF INTENT

The purpose of this Letter is to confirm Kubota Corporation's intention to
proceed with Paracelsian's proposed Phase I feasibility study, which is part of
the DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION OF ACCELERATED EXTRACTION AND
FRACTIONATION/CLEANUP PROCEDURES FOR USE IN PREPARING JAPANESE MUNICIPAL
INCINERATOR WASTE SAMPLES, INCLUDING EXHAUST GAS, FLY ASH AND BOTTOM ASH, FOR
TESTING USING PARACELSIAN, INC.'S AH-IMMUNOASSAY.

The Phase I feasibility study will include elimination of PAHs and preparation
of sample extracts from which PAHs have been removed for Immunoassay testing and
validation using GC/MS as per the technique described in Figure 1 of the above
proposal. The total Phase I feasibility study cost is US $48,000.

Prior to payment for the Phase I feasibility study, Paracelsian, Inc.
understands that Kubota Corporation must follow appropriate internal protocol
and receive authorization for payment. After Kubota Corporation receives
authorization a formal agreement will be drafted detailing the Phase I
feasibility study.

Upon completion of the Phase I feasibility study, the two parties will discuss
Phase I feasibility study results and determine if the two parties mutually
agree to proceed with the further phases of this project.

Paracelsian, Inc. also has Kubota Corporation's agreement for Paracelsian to
issue a limited public statement that explains the Phase I feasibility study.
The limitation on this public statement is that it will not use Kubota's actual
name but quote a Japanese company.

KUBOTA CORPORATION                               PARACELSIAN, INC.

/s/ Nobuyuki Nishiguchi                          /s/ Bernard M. Landes
-------------------------------                  -------------------------------
    Nobuyuki Nishiguchi                              Bernard M. Landes
    General Manager, R&D Headquarters                President and CEO

Date: January 29, 1999                           Date: January 29, 1999
     ----------------------                           --------------------------
#### MRS. FRANCES PREVATTE v. W. D. PREVATTE.

(Filed 16 December, 1953.)

1. Appeal and Error § 12—

Where the judge writes on the judgment that plaintiff be allowed to appeal *in forma pauperis*upon compliance with the statute, but plaintiff obtains no order allowing appeal *in forma pauperis*after the filing of affidavit of poverty subsequent to the term, the appeal must be dismissed for failure to comply with the mandatory provision of the statute. G.S. 1-288.

2. Same—

The statutory requirements of appeals *in forma pauperis*are mandatory, and failure to comply deprives the Supreme Court of any appellate jurisdiction.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Grady, Emergency Judge,*August Term, 1953, of RobesoN.

Appeal dismissed.

I. *Murchison Biggs for plaintiff appellant.*

*Robert Weinstein and F. D. Hachett for defendant appellee'.*

Per Curiam.

This was a suit for divorce *a mensa.*From order denying motion for alimony *pendente Ute*the plaintiff gave notice of appeal and attempted to appeal *in forma pauperis.*However, it appears *121that there was no order allowing appeal *in forma, pauperis*after the filing of affidavit of poverty subsequent to the term. GLS. 1-288. True, the judge wrote in the judgment “plaintiff allowed to appeal *in forma pau-peris*upon compliance with the statute,” but this would not authorize disregard of the provisions of the statute. *Anderson v. Worthington,*238 N.C. 577. The requirements of the statute allowing appeals *in forma pauperis*are mandatory and failure to comply deprives this Court of any appellate jurisdiction. *Williams v. Tillman,*229 N.C. 434, 50 S.E. 2d 33; *Brown v. Kress & Co.,*207 N.C. 722, 178 S.E. 248.

Appeal dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 7, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12534-12539]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5477]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Agency Form Under Review by the Office of Management and Budget

    DOC has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for 
clearance the following proposal for collection of information under 
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
    Agency: Bureau of the Census.
    Title: 1994 Survey of Women-Owned Businesses.
    Form Number(s): WB-1.
    Agency Approval Number: 0607-0765-EXPEDITED REVIEW.
    Type of Request: Revision of a currently approved collection.
    Burden: 65,000 hours.
    Number of Respondents: 130,000.
    Avg Hours Per Response: 30 minutes.
    Needs and Uses: The Bureau of the Census will conduct the 1994 
Survey of Women-Owned Businesses (WOB) to determine the size of the 
women-owned subset of sole proprietorships, corporations, and 
partnerships. The [[Page 12535]] WOB is designed to collect data on the 
ownership characteristics of a sample of businesses to determine which 
are owned by women. Additionally, the survey will gather information on 
the viability and growth of these businesses. Federal, state, and local 
governments use WOB statistics as a framework for assessing and 
directing programs designed to promote the activities of women-owned 
businesses.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit organizations.
    Frequency: One-time.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    OMB Desk Officer: Maria Gonzalez, (202) 395-7313.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Gerald Tache, DOC Forms Clearance Officer, (202) 
482-3271, Department of Commerce, room 5312, 14th and Constitution 
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Maria Gonzalez, OMB Desk Officer, room 
10201, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.

    Dated: March 1, 1995.
Gerald Tache,
Departmental Forms Clearance Officer, Office of Management and 
Organization.
BILLING CODE 3510-07-F


[[Page 12536]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN07MR95.044


[[Page 12537]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN07MR95.045


[[Page 12538]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN07MR95.046


[[Page 12539]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN07MR95.047



[FR Doc. 95-5477 Filed 3-6-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-07-C