alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2727

Faurecia US Holdings:

This letter concerns the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the 

notice published at 83 FR 32181 (‘July 11 notice’). I am pleased to notify you that although 

your individual request previously had been denied, the United States Trade Representative – in 

response to other requests – has determined to grant an exclusion that covers the product 

described in your request. This exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion responsive to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

December 28, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-1966

Braeburn Systems LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/12.21.18_Notice_of_Product_E

xclusions.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2691

Price Pump Company:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
#### NORTH CAROLINA CORPORATION COMMISSION v. BANK OF HAMLET.

(Filed 17 November, 1926.)

Civil action, before *Schenck, J.,*at June Term, 1926, of Richmond.

On 21 October, 1925, and on 23 October, 1925, Pine Hall Brick Company shipped from its plant in Stokes County two car loads of brick to E. A. Hillburn at Hamlet, N. 0. The bills of lading covering said shipments were sent by the shippers with draft attached to the Bank of Hamlet, marked for “collection only.” Upon arrival of the brick at Hamlet, the consignee paid said drafts to the Bank of Hamlet and received bills of lading sent by the Pine Hall Brick Company. The Bank of Hamlet deposited the amount in its general fund, and through its assistant cashier issued to Pine Hall Brick Company checks for the amount of said drafts. One of these checks was drawn on the American Trust Company of Charlotte, and the other on the American National Bank of Richmond, and at the time the cashier of the Bank of Hamlet issued said checks to the Pine Hall Brick Company, the Bank of Hamlet had sufficient deposit to its credit in the banks upon which said checks were drawn to pay said checks. The Pine Hall Brick Company deposited said checks for collection, and before collection could be made, the Bank of Hamlet was placed in the hands of a receiver. The Pine Hall Brick Company filed a claim with the receiver, claiming a preference by reason of the fact that the item was sent to the Bank of Hamlet for “collection only,” and title to said fund therefore did not pass to the bank.

The trial judge rendered the following judgment:

“This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned judge holding the courts of the Thirteenth Judicial District, this, the June Term, 1926, of the Superior Court of Richmond County, upon motion in the cause ma.de by Pine Hall Brick Company, demanding priority of its claim against the Bank of Hamlet, Page Trust Company, and S. O. Bauersfeld, receivers, and being heard upon an agreed statement of facts as appears of record, and after argument of counsel for both plaintiff and defendant, the Court, relying upon the authority of the *824
      *Corporation Comfmission v. Bank,*137 N. C., Report, p. 697, is" of opinion that the claim of the plaintiff is not entitled to a preference over general creditors of the Bank of Hamlet:

It is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged that the defendants pay said claim pro rata with the other claims of general creditors of the Bank of Hamlet.”

*F. L. Webster for plaintiff.*

*Bynum & Henry for defendant.*

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the court was correct. The case of *Corporation Commission v. Bank,*137 N. C., 697, is decisive of all questions presented by this record. The judgment is

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 29 (Monday, February 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 8236]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-3492]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

 Jamestown Union Bancshares, Inc.; Notice of Application to 
Engage de novo in Permissible Nonbanking Activities

    The company listed in this notice has filed an application under 
Sec.  225.23(a)(1) of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.23(a)(1)) 
for the Board's approval under section 4(c)(8) of the Bank Holding 
Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843(c)(8)) and Sec.  225.21(a) of Regulation Y 
(12 CFR 225.21(a)) to commence or to engage de novo, either directly or 
through a subsidiary, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in Sec.  
225.25 of Regulation Y as closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, such activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    The application is available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. Once the application has been accepted 
for processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing on the question whether consummation of the proposal can 
``reasonably be expected to produce benefits to the public, such as 
greater convenience, increased competition, or gains in efficiency, 
that outweigh possible adverse effects, such as undue concentration of 
resources, decreased or unfair competition, conflicts of interests, or 
unsound banking practices.'' Any request for a hearing on this question 
must be accompanied by a statement of the reasons a written 
presentation would not suffice in lieu of a hearing, identifying 
specifically any questions of fact that are in dispute, summarizing the 
evidence that would be presented at a hearing, and indicating how the 
party commenting would be aggrieved by approval of the proposal.
    Comments regarding the application must be received at the Reserve 
Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than 
February 27, 1995.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Zane R. Kelley, Vice President) 
104 Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303:
    1. Jamestown Union Bancshares, Inc., Jamestown, Tennessee; to 
engage de novo through its finance company subsidiary, Jamestown Loan & 
Thrift Co., Jamestown, Tennessee, in credit-related insurance agency 
activities, pursuant to Sections 225.25(b)(8)(i) and (ii) of the 
Board's Regulation Y. The proposed activity woll be conducted 
throughout the State of Tennessee.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 7, 
1995.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-3492 Filed 2-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4232 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4232

   To address the recovery of certain costs with respect to certain 
   Reclamation facilities in the Colorado River Basin, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 17, 2022

   Mr. Kelly introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To address the recovery of certain costs with respect to certain 
   Reclamation facilities in the Colorado River Basin, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RECOVERY OF CERTAIN COSTS WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN COLORADO 
              RIVER BASIN RECLAMATION FACILITIES.

    (a) In General.--With respect to hydropower production from any 
Reclamation facility in the Colorado River Basin with hydropower as an 
authorized project purpose, the Secretary of the Interior shall not--
            (1) allocate to preference hydropower contractors who 
        receive power from the applicable Reclamation facility any 
        operations and maintenance costs for any period during which 
        the applicable facility is not able to generate hydropower as a 
        result of dry hydrologic conditions; or
            (2) recover from preference hydropower contractors 
        construction costs for the Reclamation facility for any water 
        year during which, for a period of more than 180 days, no power 
        is produced by the applicable facility.
    (b) Nonreimbursable Costs.--Any costs incurred by the United States 
under subsection (a) shall be nonreimbursable to the United States.
    (c) Effect.--Nothing in this section alters or affects any water 
right with respect to--
            (1) the United States;
            (2) any Indian Tribe, band, or community;
            (3) any State or political subdivision of a State; or
            (4) any person.
    (d) Funding.--In addition to amounts otherwise available, there is 
appropriated to the Secretary of the Interior and the Administrator of 
the Western Area Power Administration for each fiscal year, out of any 
funds in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, such sums as are 
necessary for the Secretary of the Interior and the Administrator of 
the Western Area Power Administration, respectively, to carry out 
authorized activities and obligations that would otherwise be carried 
out using amounts collected from preference hydropower contractors as 
payments for the costs described in subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3132

Speck Pumps-Pool Products, Inc: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions.

pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (No.
333-57339 (as amended), 333-62859 and 333-39485 (as amended)) pertaining to (i)
the 1995 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan and Outstanding Options of
Mariner Health Group, Inc.; (ii) the Paragon Health Network, Inc. Employee Stock
Purchase Plan, and (iii) the Paragon Health Network, Inc. Long-Term Incentive
Plan; GranCare, Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan; GranCare, Inc. 1996 Stock Incentive
Plan; GranCare, Inc. 1996 Replacement Stock Option Plan; GranCare, Inc. Outside
Directors' Stock Incentive Plan; and Evergreen Healthcare, Inc. Employees'
401(k) Profit Sharing Plan, of our report dated December 12, 2001 (except for
Note 1, as to which the date is December 15, 2001) with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Mariner Post-Acute Network,
Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended September 30,
2001.


Ernst & Young LLP


December 27, 2001
Atlanta, Georgia
3XEOLF9HUVLRQRI%&,

38030$1,)2/'&$67,1*35(6685(&217$,1,1*67$,1/(6667((/



3,$==$52%(57

35,&(3803&203$1<

2WKHU

12

3XEOLF9HUVLRQRI%&,
 .*

12

12

 .*



,03257,1*7+,63$57)520&+,1$&2676
#### STATE v. MURRAY B. BALLENGER

(Filed 20 November, 1957)

Appeal by defendant from *Seawell, J.,*June Term 1957 of Johnston.

The defendant was tried and convicted in the Recorder’s Court of Benson, North Carolina on a warrant issued out of said court, charging that on or about 17 May 1957, at and in said County and within the jurisdiction of said court, the defendant did unlawfully and wilfully operate a motor vehicle upon the public highways of North Carolina after his North Carolina operator’s license had been permanently revoked. From the judgment imposed the defendant appealed to the Superior Court where he was tried *de novo*on the original warrant.

The defendant, through his counsel, stipulated that on 17 May 1957 his North Carolina operator’s license had been permanently revoked by the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles of the State of North Carolina.

The State offered evidence to the effect that the defendant drove a motor vehicle on 17 May 1957 upon the public highways of Johnston County within five miles of the Town of Benson. The jury returned a verdict of guilty. The defendant was sentenced to two years in the common jail of Johnston County *220and assigned to work the roads under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission.

The defendant appeals, assigning error.

*Attorney General Patton, Asst. Attorney General Moody, for the State.*

*E. R. Temple, for defendant.*

Per Curiam.

On this appeal the defendant raises the same questions with respect to the validity and jurisdiction of the Recorder’s Court of Benson that he raised in *S. v. Ballenger, ante,*216. What we said there is applicable here.

In the trial below we find

No Error.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-10518

Siemens Industry, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

“Made in China 2025” or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
condensed consolidated statement of income for the eleven months ended October
31, 1998 and the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of October 31, 1998,
and is qualified in its enirety by reference to such condensed consolidated
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   11-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                          38,122
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,079
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,588)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         972,030
<DEPRECIATION>                                (34,799)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,015,922
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        983,929
<COMMON>                                             1
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (47,360)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,015,922
<SALES>                                        109,142
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               111,135
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                46,548
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,588
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              44,948
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,639
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             19,639
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,639
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS **AUSTIN** 

### Uoaerobl.. T. Y. TrlmbLo yirst A88f*tult stde Baprlatena8Bb astia, Tar88 

## DearBier of your**reqaort**

the 

## l**’ 8-8p~TtbW8!8t**  Of it&d8 6-8 

## EOt apply 

## to iadependen$ 

### rohooldl8triefmharln(l $088 than lM 8choloatie8, shoc&ff the oouaty 8Up8~intUdOnt ai8tXibtlt8 

## the rOn,f t0 t&O c)e Wll 8ahOO1 dbtX$Ut8 - blb~nd.t 8*hDd U8- **tribt8** mlth I@88 thUt 160 SO+OlO8tiOS Of t& eouaty7

## Eonor8blo 9. K. Trlmblo,hge 8 •~8th8~WU8t~~~tOB4Ult~tk0 

## l **ithorfty to**  **nka the**  **mpportlomoat dthout**  

## tbapprolal*ttho •wt~bou4oitrutoor~

### Tour8 Tery truly 01 TKUB
APPROVEDAW 12, 1939