alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| Date:                  June 30, 2005 | /s/                  Federico Sada                  González                                       |
|--------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 | Name: Federico                  Sada González                                                                                                                       |
|                                 | Title:                    President                  and Chief                             Executive Officer |

|   | /s/                  Claudio del Valle                  Cabello                        |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name: Claudio                  del Valle Cabello                                                                                              |
|   | Title:                    Chief                  Administrative                          Officer |

|   | /s/                  Álvaro Rodríguez                  Arregui            |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name: Álvaro                  Rodríguez Arregui                                                                             |
|   | Title:                    Chief                  Financial                  Officer                                              |
Exhibit 32


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Aurora Foods Inc. (the
"Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Dale F.
Morrison, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and William R. McManaman,
as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Dale F. Morrison
--------------------
Dale F. Morrison
Chairman of the Board and
Interim Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2003


/s/ William R. McManaman
------------------------
William R. McManaman
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
August 14, 2003

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

______________________________________________________________________________
117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3884 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 404 U.S. Highway 41 North in Baraga, Michigan, as the ‘‘Cora Reynolds Anderson Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 3884 ES

1 SECTION 1. CORA REYNOLDS ANDERSON POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 404 U.S. Highway 41 North in 

4 Baraga, Michigan, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘Cora Reynolds Anderson Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Cora Reynolds Ander10 son Post Office’’. 

Passed the Senate September 20, 2022. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3884 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postderson Post Office’’. in Baraga, Michigan, as the ‘‘Cora Reynolds An- al Service located at 404 U.S. Highway 41 North
Exhibit
99.1



Certification of CEO and CFO
Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
BlackRock, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Laurence D. Fink, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
and Paul L. Audet, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      
|------
|      
|Name: 
|Title:
|Date: 
|      
|      
|Name: 
|Title:
|Date: 



This certification
accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and should not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to BlackRock, Inc. and will be retained by BlackRock Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<Page>

EXHIBIT 23.1

                                     CONSENT

     We have issued our reports dated February 14, 2001, except for Note Y for
which the date is April 5, 2002 accompanying the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of Daw Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries, included in
Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Daw Technologies, Inc., on Form 10-K/A
for the year ended December 31, 2000. We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Daw Technologies,
Inc., on Forms S-3 (File No. 33-73292 effective January 3, 1994, File No.
33-84224 effective March 20, 1995, File No. 33-93656 effective June 30, 1995,
File No. 333-05541 effective July 15, 1996 and File No. 333-38350 effective
September, 2000) and on Forms S-8 (File No. 33-93206 effective June 7, 1995 and
File No. 333-03930 effective April 23, 1996).

                                               /s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Salt Lake City, Utah
April 5, 2002
EXHIBIT 11
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

The Company has computed and presented earnings per share ("EPS") in accordance
with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128. Reconciliation of the
numerators and the denominators of the basic and diluted per share computation
for net income are as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         (amounts in thousands, except per share data)
                                                                          (unaudited)

                                                                 Income      Shares    Per-Share
                                                              (Numerator) (Denominator)  Amount
                                                               ---------   -----------   ------
<S>                                                              <C>          <C>       <C>
Three months ended March 31, 2005
   Basic EPS
      Net income and income available to common stockholders     $1,329       1,682     $   .79
      Effect of dilutive securities, options                                      0
                                                                 ------       -----
   Diluted EPS
      Income available to common stockholders and assumed
         conversions                                             $1,329       1,682     $   .79
                                                                 ======       =====

Three months ended March 31, 2004
   Basic EPS
      Net income and income available to common stockholders     $1,072       1,424     $   .75
      Effect of dilutive securities, options                                      0
                                                                 ------       -----
   Diluted EPS
      Income available to common stockholders and assumed
         conversions                                             $1,072       1,424     $   .75
                                                                 ======       =====
</TABLE>



                                       20
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR ADAMS GOLF, INC. AND
ITS SUBSIDIARIES FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY TO SUCH UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          15,493
<SECURITIES>                                    14,473
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,656
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,023
<INVENTORY>                                     13,561
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                54,439
<PP&E>                                           9,242
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,391
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  95,144
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,449
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            23
<OTHER-SE>                                      84,888
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    95,144
<SALES>                                          8,558
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,558
<CGS>                                            3,191
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,908
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,457
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   100
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  10
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,564)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,250)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,314)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,314)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.15)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          22,623
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,576
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,843
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                36,042
<PP&E>                                         178,646
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,593
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 204,440
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,990
<BONDS>                                        115,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      82,450
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   204,440
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,435
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,536
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,043
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,856
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,856
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (6,702)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,154 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
----

|   | 1. | I      have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-Q of MIPS Technologies, Inc.      (this "Amendment"); and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | Based      on my knowledge, this Amendment does not contain any untrue      statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to      make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such      statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by      this Amendment. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                    |   |                                                                                                                                          |
|-------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:      May 13, 2009 | By:    | /s/ JOHN E.      BOURGOIN    John E.      BourgoinPresident and Chief Executive      Officer,MIPS Technologies,      Inc. |

----
#### C. I. T. CORPORATION v. T. B. DRAKE and C. A. BURGESS.

(Filed 1 May, 1929.)

Pleadings D lb — Where only one defendant is served with summons and the action is against him solely, demurrer for misjoinder properly overruled.

Where an action is instituted against two defendants and only one of them is served with summons and the action is solely against the one served and this appears from the face of the complaint, a demurrer for misjoinder of parties and causes of action is properly overruled.

*163Appeal by C. A. Burgess from a judgment-of *Harding, J.,*overruling a demurrer to the. complaint. From MecicleNBueg.

Affirmed.

*Lewis & Lewis for appellant.*

*Pharr & Currie for appellee.*

Pee Cubiam.

This is an action to recover possession of a motor car. The plaintiff alleges that on 9 June, 1928, the Asbeville Overland-Knigbt, Incorporated, sold and delivered a Whippet coupe to T. B.‘ Drake upon a conditional sales contract which was duly recorded in Buncombe County; that on 29 June, 1928, the plaintiff for value bought the note which Drake had executed to secure a part of the purchase price, before its maturity and without notice of any equities against the collection of the note; that after Drake’s conviction for a breach' of the prohibition laws the car was sold by the sheriff of Iredell County to the defendant Burgess. It is alleged further that the sale was illegal and that the only interest Burgess acquired, if any, was the interest of Drake. Drake has never been served with summons and is not a party to the action. The defendant demurred to the complaint on the ground of an improper joinder of parties and causes of action. The demurrer was overruled and Burgess excepted and appealed.

There is really only one defendant; and since the demurrer admits the . allegations in the complaint it is obvious that there is no error in the judgment.

Affirmed.
FifirtUflAyjJolS'

JECEIVED IN

i

FEB 04 208

.UoKJ&fcfl^If. Lqux3£ f&qszjod dl&ek AtoMcoete,Gtei* J" ' '

—,—,—,—„—_

/ "" "

. , i,_....,. -, •

fe: r/t.Ci. Klo. Q^Olo~D&flHA.(l\ Ld&rA^AU'M

hsA^ (LU/ex,

Bsi^ n_ui£ &fP£c£> ;

Mort Xt xd ~rU£££ (teim/ni>d ft^otta^ AJOir te>

PL£fti£ 3a*R&w me xf A vect<5f2>ij qaj /

uWc \t\n<> h^yjj /r)4JS<z,

HUfl/UU \^cu. fbl UojuM C^9^Sd6^77j2>A/s

dti&a^JE IP&fizafULLj;
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 13, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3655

Omega Environmental Technologies, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3506

JLG Industries, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAYMOND D. CHESTER, Jr.,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

JOHN DE MORALES, Executive Director

of Atascadero State Hospital (ASH), as

individual capacities; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 11-55773

D.C. No. 2:09-cv-04256-DMG-JC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Dolly M. Gee, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 10, 2012** 

Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Raymond D. Chester, Jr., who is committed to a state psychiatric hospital

facility, appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C.

FILED

SEP 14 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-55773

§ 1983 action alleging that defendants failed to protect him from assault by another

patient. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Doe 1

v. Abbott Labs., 571 F.3d 930, 933 (9th Cir. 2009), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Chester’s failure

to protect claim because Chester failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as

to whether defendants substantially departed from accepted professional judgment,

or were personally involved in the alleged constitutional violations. See

Youngberg v. Romeo, 457 U.S. 307, 321-23 (1982); Starr v. Baca, 652 F.3d 1202,

1208 (9th Cir. 2011), cert. denied, 132 S. Ct. 2101 (2012).

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Chester’s failure

to train claim because Chester failed to raise a genuine dispute as to whether the

existing training program was inadequate, whether any failure to train was the

result of defendants’ deliberate indifference, or whether the allegedly inadequate

training was what “actually caused” the alleged constitutional violation. Merritt v.

County of Los Angeles, 875 F.2d 765, 770 (9th Cir. 1989).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Chester’s motion

for appointment of counsel because Chester failed to establish exceptional

circumstances. See Agyeman v. Corr. Corp. of Am., 390 F.3d 1101, 1103 (9th Cir.

2004) (setting forth standard of review and requirements for appointment of
3 11-55773

counsel).

Chester’s remaining contentions concerning discovery issues are unavailing. 

AFFIRMED.