Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 47 / Friday, March 10, 1995 / Notices 13147

1 53 FERC ¶ 62,155 (1990).

[Project Nos. 2056–013, et al.]

Hydroelectric Applications [Northern

States Power Co., et al.]; Applications

Take notice that the following

hydroelectric applications have been

filed with the Commission and are

available for public inspection:

1 a. Type of Application: Amendment

of License.

b. Project No: 2056–013.

c. Date Filed: November 14, 1994.

d. Applicant: Northern States Power

Company (NSPC).

e. Name of Project: St. Anthony Falls

Project.

f. Location: On the Mississippi River,

within the City of Minneapolis,

Hennepin County, Minnesota.

g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power

Act, 16 U.S.C. 791(a)–825(r).

h. Applicant Contact: Jack J. Schutz,

P.E., Senior Environmental Engineer,

Northern States Power Company, 414

Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis, MN 55401–

1927, (612) 330–5621.

i. FERC Contact: Mohamad Fayyad,

(202) 219–2665.

j. Comment Date: April 6, 1995.

k. Description of Amendment: NSPC

proposes to delete an authorized

redevelopment of a powerhouse at its

Lower Dam development. The

powerhouse was authorized by a

Commission order amending license

issued on November 14, 1990, with an

installed capacity of 16 MW.1 Since

NSPC decided not to rebuild the

powerhouse the entire Lower Dam

development must be deleted from the

license for the St. Anthony Falls Project;

start of construction deadline for

rebuilding the powerhouse was

November 13, 1994.

l. This notice also consists of the

following standard paragraphs: B, C2,

and D2.

2 a. Type of Application: Amendment

of License.

b. Project No.: P–472–014.

c. Date Filed: November 25, 1994.

d. Applicant: PacifiCorp.

e. Name of Project: Oneida.

f. Location: On the Bear River in

Franklin County, Idaho.

g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power

Act, 16 U.S.C. 791(a)–825(r).

h. Applicant Contact:

Stanley A. deSousa, Director of Hydro

Resources, PacifiCorp, 920 SW Sixth

Avenue, Suite 610, Portland, Oregon

97204, (503) 464–5343

Thomas H. Nelson, Stoel Rives Boley

Jones & Grey, 900 SW Fifth Avenue,

Suite 2300, Portland, Oregon 97204–

1268, (503) 294–9281

i. FERC Contact: Regina Saizan, (202)

219–2673.

j. Comment Date: April 6, 1995.

k. Description of Project: The licensee

requests that its license be amended to

extend the expiration date of the license

from June 30, 2000 to October 1, 2001.

l. This notice also consists of the

following standard paragraphs: B, C1,

and D2.

3 a. Type of Application: Minor

License.

b. Project No.: P–11519–000.

c. Date Filed: February 10, 1995.

d. Applicant: Wisconsin Edison

Corporation.

e. Name of Project: Stoughton Hydro

Project.

f. Location: On the Yahara River in

Dane County, near Dunkirk, Wisconsin.

g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power

Act, 16 U.S.C. 791(a)–825(r).

h. Applicant Contact: Mr. Peter H.

Burno, 1343 Veek Road, Stoughton, WI

53589, (608) 873–8656.

i. FERC Contact: Ed Lee (202) 219–

2809.

j. Comment Date: 60 days from the

filing date in paragraph c.

k. Description of Project: The existing

project would consists of: (1) An

existing dam and intake structure; (2) an

existing 82-acre reservoir; (3) a

powerhouse containing two generating

units for a total installed capacity of 192

Kw; (4) a 300-foot-long transmission

line; and (5) appurtenant facilities. The

applicant estimates that the total

average annual generation would be 450

Mwh for the project. All lands and

project works are owned by the City of

Stoughton, Wisconsin.

l. With this notice, we are initiating

consultation with the Wisconsin State

Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO), as

required by section 106, National

Historic Preservation Act, and the

regulations of the Advisory Council on

Historic Preservation, 36 CFR 800.4.

m. Pursuant to § 4.32(b)(7) of 18 CFR

of the Commission’s regulations, if any

resource agency, Indian Tribe, or person

believes that an additional scientific

study should be conducted in order to

form an adequate factual basis for a

complete analysis of the application on

its merit, the resource agency, Indian

Tribe, or person must file a request for

a study with the Commission not later

than 60 days from the filing date and

serve a copy of the request on the

applicant.

4 a. Type of Application: Minor

License.

b. Project No.: P–11520–000.

c. Date Filed: February 10, 1995.

d. Applicant: Wisconsin Edison

Corporation.

e. Name of Project: Stebbinsville

Hydro Project.

f. Location: On the Yahara River in

Rock County, near Porter, Wisconsin.

g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power

Act, 16 U.S.C. 791(a)–825(r).

h. Applicant Contact: Mr. Peter H.

Burno, 1343 Veek Road, Stoughton, WI

53589, (608) 873–8656.

i. FERC Contact: Ed Lee (202) 219–

2809.

j. Comment Date: 60 days from the

filing date in paragraph c.

k. Description of Project: The existing

project would consists of: (1) An

existing dam and intake structure; (2) an

existing 80-acre reservoir; (3) a

powerhouse containing a single 375-kW

generating unit; (4) a 40-foot-long

transmission line; and (5) appurtenant

facilities. The applicant estimates that

the total average annual generation

would be 1,500 MWh for the project. All

lands and project works are owned by

the applicant.

l. With this notice, we are initiating

consultation with the Wisconsin State

Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO), as

required by section 106, National

Historic Preservation Act, and the

regulations of the Advisory Council on

Historic Preservation, 36 CFR 800.4.

m. Pursuant to § 4.32(b)(7) of 18 CFR

of the Commission’s regulations, if any

resource agency, Indian Tribe, or person

believes that an additional scientific

study should be conducted in order to

form an adequate factual basis for a

complete analysis of the application on

its merit, the resource agency, Indian

Tribe, or person must file a request for

a study with the Commission not later

than 60 days from the filing date and

serve a copy of the request on the

applicant.

5 a. Type of Application: Major

Relicense.

b. Project No.: 2705–003.

c. Date filed: September 30, 1992.

d. Applicant: Seattle City Light.

e. Name of Project: Newhalem Creek.

f. Location: On Newhalem Creek in

Whatcom County, Washington, wholly

within the Ross Lake National

Recreation Area.

g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power

Act, 16 U.S.C. 791(a)–825(r).

h. Applicant Contact: Gary Zarker,

Superintendent, Seattle City Light, 1015

Third Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104–1198,

(206) 684–3200.

i. FERC Contact: James Hunter at (202)

219–2839.

j. Deadline Date: See attached

paragraph D10. The Commission’s due

date for filing a final amendment of this

application is 60 days from issuance of

this notice.
13148 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 47 / Friday, March 10, 1995 / Notices

k. Status of Environmental Analysis:

The application is ready for

environmental analysis at this time—see

attached paragraph D10.

l. Description of Project: The existing

project consists of: (1) A 45-foot-long,

10-foot-high concrete overflow dam,

crest elevation 1,012 feet, across

Newhalem Creek with a combination

sluiceway and intake structure; (2)

water conveyance facilities including a

5-foot-square, 54.5-foot-long, vertical

rock shaft, a 6-foot by 7-foot, 2,452-footlong rock tunnel, and a 33-inchdiameter, 925-foot-long penstock; (3) a

30-foot-wide, 56-foot-long, wood-framed

powerhouse containing a generating

unit with an installed capacity of 2.3

MW; (4) two timber flumes that

discharge into a 350-foot-long tailrace

returning project flows to the Skagit

River; (5) a 4,387-foot-long, 7.2-kV

transmission line tying into the Gorge

powerhouse of Project No. 553; (6) about

2.5 miles of access roads to the

diversion and powerhouse; and (7)

appurtenant facilities.

m. Purpose of Project: The average

annual generation of the Newhalem

Creek project is 18 GWh. Power

generated at the project is delivered to

customers within the applicant’s service

area.

n. This notice also consists of the

following standard paragraph: D10.

o. Available Locations of Application:

A copy of the application is available for

inspection and reproduction at the

Commission’s Public Reference and

Files Maintenance Branch, located at

941 North Capitol Street, NE., Room

3104, Washington, DC 20426, or by

calling (202) 208–1371. A copy is also

available for inspection and

reproduction at Seattle City Light’s

offices at 1015 Third Avenue, Seattle,

Washington.

6 a. Type of Application: Exemption

5 MW or less.

b. Project No.: 11316–002.

c. Date filed: January 31, 1995.

d. Applicant: Iliamna-NewhalenNondalton Electric Cooperative, Inc.

e. Name of Project: Tazimina.

f. Location: On the Tazimina River,

near Iliamna, Newhalen, and

Nondalton, Section 24, Range 32 West,

Township 3 South, Seward Meridian, in

Southcentral Alaska.

g. Filed Pursuant to: Section 2407 of

the Energy Policy Act of 1992 and the

Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791(a)–

825(r).

h. Applicant Contact: Brent Petrie,

General Manager, INNEC, P.O. Box 210,

Iliamna, Alaska 99606, (907) 571–1259.

i. FERC Contact: He ́ctor M. Pe ́rez at

(202) 219–2843.

j. Comment Date: May 2, 1995.

k. Status of Environmental Analysis:

This application is ready for

environmental analysis at this time—see

attached paragraph D5.

l. The proposed project would consist

of: (1) A 2-foot-high and 100-foot-long

channel control sill consisting of precast

4-foot-long concrete blocks with a

trapezoidal section; (2) an intake

structure about 50 feet downstream and

on the opposite side of the concrete sill;

(3) a 5-foot-diameter, 430-foot-long

welded steel penstock; (4) a powerhouse

with two 350-Kw units; (5) a 6.7-milelong transmission line; and (6) other

appurtenances.

m. This notice also consists standard

paragraphs B1 and D5.

n. Available Locations of Application:

A copy of the application is available for

inspection and reproduction at the

Commission’s Public Reference and

Files Maintenance Branch, located at

941 North Capitol Street, NE., Room

3104, Washington, DC 20426, or by

calling (202) 208–1371. A copy is also

available for inspection and

reproduction at the address shown in

item h above.

Standard Paragraphs

B. Comments, Protests, or Motions to

Intervene—Anyone may submit

comments, a protest, or a motion to

intervene in accordance with the

requirements of rules of practice and

procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211, .214.

In determining the appropriate action to

take, the Commission will consider all

protests or other comments filed, but

only those who file a motion to

intervene in accordance with the

Commission’s Rules may become a

party to the proceeding. Any comments,

protests, or motions to intervene must

be received on or before the specified

comment date for the particular

application.

B1. Protests or Motions to Intervene—

Anyone may submit a protest or a

motion to intervene in accordance with

the requirements of rules of practice and

procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, 385.211,

and 385.214. In determining the

appropriate action to take, the

Commission will consider all protests

filed, but only those who file a motion

to intervene in accordance with the

Commission’s Rules may become a

party to the proceeding. Any protests or

motions to intervene must be received

on or before the specified deadline date

for the particular application.

C1. Filing and Service of Responsive

Documents—Any filings must bear in

all capital letters the title

‘‘COMMENTS’’,

‘‘RECOMMENDATIONS FOR TERMS

AND CONDITIONS’’, ‘‘PROTEST’’, OR

‘‘MOTION TO INTERVENE’’, as

applicable, and the Project Number of

the particular application to which the

filing refers. Any of the above-named

documents must be filed by providing

the original and the number of copies

provided by the Commission’s

regulations to: The Secretary, Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission, 825

North Capitol Street, NE., Washington,

DC 20426. A copy of any motion to

intervene must also be served upon each

representative of the Applicant

specified in the particular application.

C2. Filing and Service of Responsive

Documents—Any filings must bear in

all capital letters the title

‘‘COMMENTS,’’

‘‘RECOMMENDATIONS FOR TERMS

AND CONDITIONS,’’ ‘‘NOTICE OF

INTENT TO FILE COMPETING

APPLICATION,’’ ‘‘COMPETING

APPLICATION,’’ ‘‘PROTEST,’’ or

‘‘MOTION TO INTERVENE,’’ as

applicable, and the Project Number of

the particular application to which the

filing refers. Any of these documents

must be filed by providing the original

and the number of copies pRovided by

the Commission’s regulations to: The

Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission, 825 North Capitol Street,

NE., Washington, DC 20426. A copy of

a notice of intent, competing

application, or motion to intervene must

also be served upon each representative

of the Applicant specified in the

particular application.

D2. Agency Comments—Federal,

state, and local agencies are invited to

file comments on the described

application. A copy of the application

may be obtained by agencies directly

from the Applicant. If an agency does

not file comments within the time

specified for filing comments, it will be

presumed to have no comments. One

copy of an agency’s must also be sent to

the Applicant’s representatives.

D5. Filing and Service of Responsive

Documents—The application is ready

for environmental analysis at this time,

and the Commission is requesting

comments, reply comments,

recommendations, terms and

conditions, and prescriptions.

The Commission directs, pursuant to

§ 4.34(b) of the regulations (see Order

No. 533 issued May 8, 1991, 56 FR

23108, May 20, 1991) that all comments,

recommendations, terms and conditions

and prescriptions concerning the

application be filed with the

Commission within 60 days from the

issuance date of this notice. (May 2,

1995 for Project No. 11316–002). All

reply comments must be filed with the

Commission within 105 days from the
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 47 / Friday, March 10, 1995 / Notices 13149

date of this notice. (June 16, 1995 for

Project No. 11316–002).

Anyone may obtain an extension of

time for these deadlines from the

Commission only upon a showing of

good cause or extraordinary

circumstances in accordance with 18

CFR 385.2008.

All filings must (1) bear in all capital

letters the title ‘‘PROTEST,’’ ‘‘MOTION

TO INTERVENE,’’ ‘‘COMMENTS,’’

‘‘REPLY COMMENTS,’’

‘‘RECOMMENDATIONS,’’ ‘‘TERMS

AND CONDITIONS,’’ or

‘‘PRESCRIPTIONS;’’ (2) set forth in the

heading the name of the applicant and

the project number of the application to

which the filing responds; (3) furnish

the name, address, and telephone

number of the person protesting or

intervening; and (4) otherwise comply

with the requirements of 18 CFR

385.2001 through 385.2005. All

comments, recommendations, terms and

conditions or prescriptions must set

forth their evidentiary basis and

otherwise comply with the requirements

of 18 CFR 4.34(b). Agencies may obtain

copies of the application directly from

the applicant. Any of these documents

must be filed by providing the original

and the number of copies required by

the Commission’s regulations to: The

Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission, 825 North Capitol Street,

NE., Washington, DC 20426. An

additional copy must be sent to

Director, Division of Project Review,

Office of Hydropower Licensing,

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

Room 1027, at the above address. A

copy of any protest or motion to

intervene must be served upon each

representative of the applicant specified

in the particular application. A copy of

all other filings in reference to this

application must be accompanied by

proof of service on all persons listed in

the service list prepared by the

Commission in this proceeding, in

accordance with 18 CFR 4.34(b) and

385.2010.

D10. Filing and Service of Responsive

Documents—The application is ready

for environmental analysis at this time,

and the Commission is requesting

comments, reply comments,

recommendations, terms and

conditions, and prescriptions.

The Commission directs, pursuant to

§ 4.34(b) of the regulations (see Order

No. 533 issued May 8, 1991, 56 FR

23108, May 20, 1991) that all comments,

recommendations, terms and conditions

and prescriptions concerning the

application be filed with the

Commission within 60 days from the

issuance date of this notice (May 2, 1995

for Project No. 2705–003). All reply

comments must be filed with the

Commission within 105 days from the

date of this notice (June 16, 1995 for

Project No. 2705–003).

Anyone may obtain an extension of

time for these deadlines from the

Commission only upon a showing of

good cause or extraordinary

circumstances in accordance with 18

CFR 385.2008.

All filings must (1) bear in all capital

letters the title ‘‘COMMENTS’’, ‘‘REPLY

COMMENTS’’,

‘‘RECOMMENDATIONS,’’ ‘‘TERMS

AND CONDITIONS,’’ or

‘‘PRESCRIPTIONS;’’ (2) set forth in the

heading the name of the applicant and

the project number of the application to

which the filing responds; (3) furnish

the name, address, and telephone

number of the person submitting the

filing; and (4) otherwise comply with

the requirements of 18 CFR 385.2001

through 385.2005. All comments,

recommendations, terms and conditions

or prescriptions must set forth their

evidentiary basis and otherwise comply

with the requirements of 18 CFR 4.34(b).

Agencies may obtain copies of the

application directly from the applicant.

Any of these documents must be filed

by providing the original and the

number of copies required by the

Commission’s regulations to: The

Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission, 825 North Capitol Street,

NE., Washington, DC 20426. An

additional copy must be sent to

Director, Division of Project Review,

Office of Hydropower Licensing,

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

Room 1027, at the above address. Each

filing must be accompanied by proof of

service on all persons listed on the

service list prepared by the Commission

in this proceeding, in accordance with

18 CFR 4.34(b) and 385.2010.

Dated: March 6, 1995, Washington, DC.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–5967 Filed 3–9–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

Office of Hearings and Appeals

Issuance of Decisions and Orders

During the Week of November 14

Through November 18, 1994

During the week of November 14

through November 18, 1994, the

decisions and orders summarized below

were issued with respect to applications

for exception or other relief filed with

the Office of Hearings and Appeals of

the Department of Energy. The

following summary also contains a list

of submissions that were dismissed by

the Office of Hearings and Appeals.

Appeals

Brenda Wolfenbarger, 11/16/94, VFA–

0007

Brenda Wolfenbarger (Wolfenbarger)

filed an Appeal under the Freedom of

Information Act of a September 30, 1994

Determination Letter issued to her by

the Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) Oak

Ridge Operations Office (Oak Ridge).

Wolfenbarger had requested all medical

and personnel records held by Oak

Ridge concerning her father, who had

worked for a contractor at Oak Ridge

during the 1940’s. On Appeal,

Wolfenbarger contended that the DOE’s

search for responsive documents was

inadequate. After considering her

Appeal, the DOE found that Oak Ridge’s

search for responsive documents was

adequate and therefore denied her

Appeal.

Robert Heitmann, 11/16/94, VFA–0005

Robert Heitmann filed an Appeal from

a denial by the FOI and Privacy Acts

Branch, Reference and Information

Management Division, at the

Department of Energy Headquarters

(DOEHQ) of a Request for Information

which he had submitted under the

Freedom of Information Act. In

considering the Appeal, the DOE found

that one office had not adequately

searched for responsive documents, and

that the records of the searches of two

other offices were contradictory. The

matter was therefore remanded for a

new search of these three offices.

Requests for Exception

Leonard Wall Oil Co., 11/18/94, LEE–

0155

Leonard Wall Oil Company (Leonard

Wall) filed an Application for Exception

requesting permanent relief from the

Energy Information Administration

(EIA) requirement that it file Form EIA–

782B, the ‘‘Resellers’/Retailers’ Monthly

Petroleum Product Sales Report.’’ In

considering this request, the DOE found

that Leonard Wall was not experiencing

a serious hardship, gross inequity or an

unfair distribution of burdens as a result

of the requirement that it file Form EIA–

782B. On September 26, 1994, the DOE

issued a Proposed Decision and Order

determining that the exception request

should be denied. No Notice of

Objection to the Proposed Decision and

Order was filed within the prescribed

time period. Therefore, the DOE issued

the Proposed Decision and Order in

final form, denying Leonard Wall’s

Application for Exception.

Shuster Oil Co., Inc., 11/17/94, LEE–

0142