12766 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 8, 1995 / Notices

(PM) 21, Registration Division (7505C),

Office of Pesticide Programs,

Environmental Protection Agency, 401

M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460.

Office location and telephone number:

Rm. 229, CM #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis

Highway, Arlington, VA, (703) 305–

6900.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA

issued a notice, which was published in

the Federal Register of October 27, 1993

(58 FR 57827), announcing the

establishment of temporary tolerances

for the combined residues of the

fungicide Iprodione [3-(3,5-

dichlorophenyl)-N-(methylethyl)-2,4-

dioxo-1-imidazolidinecarboximide] and

its isomer [3-(1-methylethyl)-N-(3,5-

dichlorophenyl)-2,4-dioxo-1-

imidazolidinecarboximide], and its

metabolite [3-(3,5-dichlorophenyl)-2,4-

dioxo-1-imidazolidinecarboximide] in

or on the raw agricultural commodities

tangerines and tangelos at 3.0 parts per

million (ppm). These tolerances were

issued in response to pesticide petition

(PP) 3G4210, submitted by RhonePoulenc Ag Co., P.O. Box 12014, 2 T.W.

Alexander Drive, Research Triangle

Park, NC 27709.

These temporary tolerances have been

extended to permit the continued

marketing of the raw agricultural

commodities named above when treated

in accordance with the provisions of

experimental use permit 264–EUP–94,

which is being extended under the

Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and

Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) as amended

(Pub. L. 95–396, 92 Stat. 819; 7 U.S.C.

136).

The scientific data reported and other

relevant material were evaluated, and it

was determined that the extension of

these temporary tolerances will protect

the public health. Therefore, the

temporary tolerances have been

extended on the condition that the

pesticide be used in accordance with

the experimental use permit and with

the following provisions:

1. The total amount of the active

ingredient to be used must not exceed

the quantity authorized by the

experimental use permit.

2. Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co., must

immediately notify the EPA of any

findings from the experimental use that

have a bearing on safety. The company

must also keep records of production,

distribution, and performance and on

request make the records available to

any authorized officer or employee of

the EPA or the Food and Drug

Administration.

These tolerances expire April 15,

1996. Residues not in excess of this

amount remaining in or on the raw

agricultural commodities after this

expiration date will not be considered

actionable if the pesticide is legally

applied during the term of, and in

accordance with, the provisions of the

experimental use permit and temporary

tolerances. These tolerances may be

revoked if the experimental use permit

is revoked or if any experience with or

scientific data on this pesticide indicate

that such revocation is necessary to

protect the public health.

The Office of Management and Budget

has exempted this notice from the

requirements of section 3 of Executive

Order 12866.

Pursuant to the requirements of the

Regulatory Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96–

354, 94 Stat. 1164, 5 U.S.C. 601–612),

the Administrator has determined that

regulations establishing new tolerances

or raising tolerance levels or

establishing exemptions from tolerance

requirements do not have a significant

economic impact on a substantial

number of small entities. A certification

statement to this effect was published in

the Federal Register of May 4, 1981 (46

FR 24950).

Authority: 21 U.S.C. 346a(j).

List of Subjects

Environmental Protection,

Administrative practice and procedure,

Agricultural commodities, Pesticides

and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping

requirements.

Dated: February 21, 1995.

Stephen L. Johnson,

Director, Registration Division, Office of

Pesticide Programs.

[FR Doc. 95–5401 Filed 3–7–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–F

[OPP–30382; FRL–4940–1]

Mycotech Corp.; Application to

Register a Pesticide Product

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: This notice announces receipt

of an application submitted by

Mycotech Corporation to register a

pesticide product containing an active

ingredient not included in any

previously registered product pursuant

to the provisions of section 3(c)(4) of the

Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and

Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), as amended.

DATES: Written comments must be

submitted by April 7, 1995.

ADDRESSES: By mail, submit written

comments identified by the document

control number [OPP–30382] and the

file number (65626–T), to: Public

Response and Program Resources

Branch, Field Operations Divisions

(7506C), Office of Pesticide Programs,

Environmental Protection Agency, 401

M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460. In

person, bring comments to:

Environmental Protection Agency, Rm.

1132, CM #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy.,

Arlington, VA.

Information submitted as a comment

concerning this notice may be claimed

confidential by marking any part or all

of that information as ‘‘Confidential

Business Information’’ (CBI).

Information so marked will not be

disclosed except in accordance with

procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.

A copy of the comment that does not

contain CBI must be submitted for

inclusion in the public record.

Information not marked confidential

may be disclosed publicly by EPA

without prior notice. All written

comments will be available for public

inspection in Rm. 1132 at the address

given above, from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.,

Monday through Friday, excluding

holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By

mail: Janet L. Andersen, Acting Director,

Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention

Division (7501W), Office of Pesticide

Programs, Environmental Protection

Agency, 401 M St., SW., Washington,

DC 20460. Office location and telephone

number: Rm. CS51B6, Westfield

Building North Tower, 2800 Crystal

Drive, Arlington, VA 22202, (703–308–

8712).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA

received an application from Mycotech

Corp., 630 Utah Avenue, P.O. Box 4109,

Butte, MT 59702, to register the

pesticide product Mycotrol WP

Biological Insecticide (EPA File Sybmol

65626–T), containing the active

ingredient Beauvaria bassiana Strain

GHA, an ingredient not included in any

previously registered product pursuant

to the provisions of section 3(c)(4) of

FIFRA. This product is proposed for use

to control whiteflies, aphids, thrips,

fungus psyllids, and mealybugs on

vegetables, fruits, tree nuts, agronomic

crops, herbs, ornamentals, turf, and

forestry. Notice of receipt of this

application does not imply a decision

by the Agency on the application.

Notice of approval or denial of an

application to register a pesticide

product will be announced in the

Federal Register. The procedure for

requesting data will be given in the

Federal Register if an application is

approved.
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 8, 1995 / Notices 12767

Comments received within the

specified time period will be considered

before a final decision is made;

comments received after the time

specified will be considered only to the

extent possible without delaying

processing of the application.

Written comments filed pursuant to

this notice, will be available in the

Public Response and Program Resources

Branch, Field Operation Division office

at the address provided from 8 a.m. to

4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except

legal holidays. It is suggested that

persons interested in reviewing the

application file, telephone the FOD

office (703–305–5805), to ensure that

the file is available on the date of

intended visit.

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136.

List of Subjects

Environmental protection, Pesticides

and pests, Product registration.

Dated: February 24, 1995.

Janet L. Andersen,

Acting Director, Biopesticides and Pollution

Prevention Division, Office of Pesticide

Programs.

[FR Doc. 95–5397 Filed 3–7–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–F

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

[WT Docket No. 95–26; FCC 95–59]

Notice of Order to Show Cause;

Commercial Realty St. Pete, Inc.

AGENCY: Federal Communications

Commission.

ACTION: Notice of order to show cause.

SUMMARY: Commercial Realty St. Pete,

Inc. (Commercial Realty), an Interactive

Video and Data Services (IVDS) auction

bidder, and its principals are ordered to

show cause why they should not be

barred from participating in any future

Commission auction and from holding

any Commission licenses. The

Commission has determined that

Commercial Realty and its principals

have engaged in serious misconduct that

call into question their basic

qualifications to be a Commission

applicant or licensee. The hearing will

examine the misconduct to determine

whether the abuses and violations

should prohibit Commercial Realty and

its principals from participating in

Commission auctions and from being

Commission licensees.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications

Commission, Washington, DC 20554.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Joseph Weber, Enforcement Division,

Wireless Telecommunications Bureau

(202) 418–1310.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a

summary of the Order to Show Cause in

WT Docket 95–26, adopted February 15,

1995, and released February 16, 1995.

The full text of Commission decisions

are available for inspection and copying

during normal business hours in the

FCC Dockets Branch (Room 230), 1919

M Street NW., Washington, DC. The

complete text of this decision may also

be purchased from the Commission’s

copy contractor, International

Transcription Service, Inc., 2100 M

Street NW., Suite 140, Washington, DC

20037, (202) 857–3800.

Summary of Order to Show Cause

The Commission has determined that

Commercial Realty engaged in

misconduct during the Commission’s

IVDS auctions. The Commission has

found that a written declaration

submitted by Commercial Realty

contained false information about

Commercial Realty’s financial

qualifications. The Commission has also

determined that inappropriately

claimed a bidding credit as a womanowned company. Finally, the

Commission determined that James C.

Hartley, one of Commercial Realty’s

principals, engaged in improper

communications with other IVDS

bidders.

Pursuant to Section 312 of the

Communications Act of 1934, as

amended, Commercial Realty, James C.

Hartley, and Ralph E. Howe are ordered

to show cause why they should not be

barred from future Commission auctions

and from holding Commission licenses

based upon the following issues listed

below:

(1)(a) The facts and circumstances

surrounding the aforementioned

Declarations submitted to the

Commission by Commercial Realty St.

Pete, Inc.;

(b) Whether Commercial Realty and/

or its principals misrepresented facts,

lacked candor, or attempted to mislead

the Commission;

(c) Whether, based on the evidence

adduced pursuant to 1 (a) and (b),

above, Commercial Realty and/or its

principals should be subject to a

forfeiture up to the statutory limit

pursuant to Section 503 of the

Communications Act, as amended, 47

U.S.C. 503.

(d) Whether, based on the evidence

adduced pursuant to 1 (a) and (b),

above, Commercial Realty and/or its

principals should be barred from future

auctions and from holding Commission

licenses.

(2)(a) The facts and circumstances

surrounding Commercial Realty’s claim

of a bidding credit as a woman-owned

small business at the IVDS auctions;

(b) Whether Commercial Realty and/

or its principals misrepresented facts,

lacked candor, or attempted to mislead

the Commission in claiming a bidding

credit as a woman-owned small

business;

(c) Whether, based on the evidence

adduced pursuant to 2 (a) and (b),

above, Commercial Realty and/or its

principals should be subject to a

forfeiture up to the statutory limit

pursuant to Section 503 of the

Communications Act, as amended, 47

U.S.C. 503;

(d) Whether, based on the evidence

adduced pursuant to 2 (a) and (b),

above, Commercial Realty’s and/or its

principals’ conduct in requesting said

bidding credit as a woman-owned small

business warrants barring Commercial

Realty and/or its principals from future

auctions and from holding Commission

licenses;

(3) Whether Commercial Realty’s and/

or its principals’ improper

communication with Christopher

Pedersen of Interactive America

Corporation should bar Commercial

Realty and/or its principals from future

auctions and from holding Commission

licenses;

(4)(a) The facts and circumstances

surrounding the letter sent by facsimile

to other successful IVDS auction

bidders;

(b) The facts and circumstances

surrounding the press release caused to

be released by Commercial Realty on, or

about, August 5, 1994;

(c) Whether, based on evidence

adduced pursuant to 4 (a) and (b),

above, Commercial Realty and/or its

principals abused the Commission

processes and should be subject to a

forfeiture up to the statutory limit

pursuant to Section 503 of the

Communications Act, as amended, 47

U.S.C. 503:

(d) Whether, based on the evidence

adduced pursuant to 4 (a) and (b),

above, Commercial Realty and/or its

prinicpals abused Commission

processes and should be barred from

future auctions and from holding

Commission licenses;

(5) Whether, based on the totality of

the evidence adduced pursuant to 1 (a)

and (b), 2 (a) and (b), 3, and 4 (a) and

(b), above, and the violations of the

Commission’s Rules established in the

Notice of Apparent Liability for

Forfeiture, File No. 519WT0002,

Commercial Realty and/or its principals