T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). 07-16714 NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T M E L V I N J O S E P H S I M M O N S , J r ., P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. M . S . E V A N S ; e t a l., D e f

e n d a n t, N o. 07- 16714 D . C . N o . C V -0 6 -0 5 6 0 8 -JW ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e N o rth e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia J a m e s W a r e , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d June 15, 2011 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , O ’ S C A N N L A IN an dF IS H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. M e l vi n J os e ph S i m m ons , J r . , aC a l i f orni as t a t e pr i s one r , appe a l s pr o s e f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e ntdi s m i s s i ng hi s 42 U . S . C . § 1983 a c t i on be c aus e he f a i l e d t o s t a t e ac l a i m a s t o tw o de f e nda nt s a nd f

a i l e d t o s e rve , ors how c aus e f or n o n - s e rv ic e , a s to ath ir d . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e 

# FI LED JU L 8 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS07-16714 2 r e v i e w d e n o v o ad i s mi s s a l u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 1 9 1 5 A ( a ) f o rf a i l u r e t o s t a t e ac l a i m, R es ni ck v. H ayes , 213 F . 3d 443, 447 ( 9th C i r . 2000) , a nd f ora n abus e of

di s c r e t i on adi s m i s s a l f

orf a i l ur e t o e f

f e c ts e rvi c e unde rR ul e 4( m ) of the F e de r a l R ul e s of C iv il P r o c e du r e , P u et t

v. B la n d f o rd , 91 2 F . 2d 27 0, 27 3 (9th C i r. 19 90 ). W e m ay a f f irm o n a n yg r o u n ds up p o rte db yth e r e c o r d , T hom ps on v . P aul , 547 F . 3d 1055, 1 0 5 8 - 5 9 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 8 ) , a n dw e a f f i rm. T he di s tr i c tc ourtpr ope r l ydi s m i s s e d S i m m ons ’ s c l a i m c onc e rni ng the h a n d lin g o f

h is g r ie v a n c e s b e c au s e in m a te s h a v e n o p r o te c te ddu e p r o c e s s r ig h ts in g r ie v a n c e p r o c e du r e s , s e e Ma n n v . A da ms , 855 F . 2d 639, 640 ( 9th C i r . 1988) ( o r d e r ) , a n dS im m o n s f

a ile dto p le a df

a c ts s h o w in g th a t an yd e f e n d a n t a c te dw ith an i nt entt o d i sc ri m i nat e a gai nsthi m on the basi s of hi s m em bers hi p i n a prot ec t ed c la s s , s e e T

hornton v . C i t

yof St. H e le ns , 425 F . 3d 1158, 1166- 67 ( 9th C i r . 2005) ( pl a i nt i f f s e e ki ng t o s t a t e c l a i m f orvi ol a t i on of

e qua l pr ot e c t i on m us ta l l e ge i nt e nt or pu rpose t o d i sc ri m i nat e bas ed on m em bers hi p i n p rot ec t ed cl as s) . T h e d istrict co u rt d idn o t ab u se it s d iscr etio n ind ism issin g S im m o n s’s a c t i on w i thoutpr e

j udi c e unde rR ul e 4( m ) be c aus e S i m m ons di d nots e rve N e w t on a n df a ile dto e s tab lis h g o o dc au s e f o rn o t h a v in g d o n e s o . See Fe d . R. Ci v . P. 4 ( m ) ; s e e a ls o B o u de tte v . B a rn e tte , 923 F . 2d 754, 755- 56 ( 9th C i r . 1991) ( hol di ng thatgo od cause m eans, ata m i ni m um , excusabl e negl ec t ). S i m m on s’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s are un pers uasi ve.07-16714 3 AF F I RME D.