13716 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 49 / Tuesday, March 14, 1995 / Notices

the Forms CE–63A/B, ‘‘Annual Solar

Thermal Collector Manufacturers

Survey’’ and ‘‘Annual Photovoltaic

Module/Cell Manufacturers Survey.’’

DATES: Written comments must be

submitted by April 13, 1995. If you

anticipate that you will be submitting

comments, but find it difficult to do so

within the period of time allowed by

this notice, you should advise the

contact person listed below of your

intention to do so as soon as possible.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to Peter

Holihan, EI–522, Energy Information

Administration, U.S. Department of

Energy, Washington, D.C. 20585. Phone:

(202) 254–5432.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Requests for additional information or

copies of the form and instructions

should be directed to Peter Holihan at

the address listed above.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

II. Current Actions

III. Request for Comments

I. Background

In order to fulfill its responsibilities

under the Federal Energy

Administration Act of 1974 (Pub. L. 93–

275) and the Department of Energy

Organization Act (Pub. L. 95–91), the

Energy Information Administration is

obliged to carry out a comprehensive,

and integrated energy data and

information program for the collection,

evaluation, assembly, analysis, and

dissemination of data and information

relating to energy resource reserves,

production, demand, technology and

relevant economic and statistical

information relating to the adequacy of

energy resources to meet demands in

the near and longer term future for the

Nation’s economic and social needs.

Form CE–63A collects data on solar

thermal collector shipments, solar

thermal systems, and solar-related

manufacturing, marketing, and

geographic information from companies

in the United States that are engaged in

manufacturing or importing solar

thermal collectors. Solar thermal

shipments are in terms of square feet.

Form CE–63B collects data on

photovoltaic cell and module

shipments, photovoltaic systems, and

photovoltaic-related manufacturing and

marketing information from companies

in the United States that are engaged in

manufacturing or importing

photovoltaic cells and modules.

Photovoltaic cell and module shipments

are in terms of electrical capacity

expressed in peak kilowatts.

II. Current Actions

At this time, the EIA is proposing a

three-year extension of Forms CE–

63A/B. The EIA is planning to meet

with solar industry companies and

associations, DOE personnel, and other

interested parties to discuss Forms CE–

63A/B. If changes are made to Forms

CE–63A and/or CE–63B as a result of

this notice, the meeting, or other

activities, the changes will be

highlighted in the Federal Register

notice announcing the submission of the

forms to the Office of Management and

Budget later this year.

III. Request for Comments

Prospective respondents and other

interested parties should comment on

the proposed extension of the Forms

CE–63A/B. The following general

guidelines are provided to assist in the

preparation of responses. When

commenting, please indicate to which

form your comments apply.

As a potential respondent:

A. Are the instructions and

definitions clear and sufficient? If not,

which instructions require clarification?

B. Can the data be submitted using the

definitions included in the instructions?

C. Can data be submitted in

accordance with the response time

specified in the instructions?

D. Public reporting burden for this

collection is estimated to average 3

hours per response. How much time,

including time for reviewing

instructions, searching existing data

sources, gathering and maintaining the

data needed, and completing and

reviewing the collection of information,

do you estimate it will require you to

complete and submit the required form?

E. What is the estimated cost of

completing this form, including the

direct and indirect costs associated with

the data collection? Direct costs should

include all costs, such as administrative

costs, directly attributable to providing

this information.

F. How can the form be improved?

G. Do you know of any other Federal,

State, or local agency that collects

similar data? If you do, specify the

agency, the data element(s), and the

means of collection.

As a potential user:

A. Can you use data at the levels of

detail indicated on the form?

B. For what purpose would you use

the data? Be specific.

C. How could the form be improved

to better meet your specific needs?

D. Are there alternate sources of data

and do you use them? What are their

deficiencies and/or strengths?

EIA is also interested in receiving

comments from persons regarding their

views on the need for the information

contained in the ‘‘Annual Solar Thermal

Collector Manufacturers Survey’’ and

‘‘Annual Photovoltaic Module/Cell

Manufacturers Survey.’’

Comments submitted in response to

this notice will be summarized and/or

included in the request for OMB

approval of the forms; they also will

become a matter of public record.

Statutory Authority: Section 2(a) of the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, (Pub. L.

96–511), which amended Chapter 35 of Title

44 United States Code (See 44 U.S.C.

§ 3506(a) and (c)(1)).

Issued in Washington, DC, March 7, 1995.

Yvonne M. Bishop,

Director, Statistical Standards, Energy

Information Administration.

[FR Doc. 95–6246 Filed 3–13–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. ER95–529–000 et al.]

Kentucky Utilities Company et al.;

Electric Rate and Corporate Regulation

Filings

March 7, 1995.

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission:

1. Kentucky Utilities Co.

[Docket No. ER95–529–000]

Take notice that on February 21, 1995,

Kentucky Utilities Company tendered

for filing an amendment to its February

1, 1995 filing in the above-referenced

docket.

Comment date: March 21, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

2. Ohio Edison Co.

[Docket No. ER95–550–000]

Take notice that on February 17, 1995,

Ohio Edison Company tendered for

filing an amendment to its February 3,

1995 filing in the above-referenced

docket.

Comment date: March 21, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

3. Wisconsin Power and Light Co.

[Docket No. ER95–649–000]

Take notice that on February 27, 1995,

Wisconsin Power and Light Company

(WP&L), tendered for filing a signed

Service Agreement under WP&L’s Bulk

Power Sales Tariff between itself and

InterCoast Power Marketing Company.

WP&L respectfully requests a waiver of

the Commission’s notice requirements,

and an effective date of February 1,

1995.
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 49 / Tuesday, March 14, 1995 / Notices 13717

Comment date: March 21, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

4. Wisconsin Public Service Corp.

[Docket No. ER95–650–000]

Take notice that on February 27, 1995,

Wisconsin Public Service Corporation

(WPSC), tendered for filing an executed

Supplement No. 2 to Transmission

Service Agreement No. 2 between WPSC

and Manitowoc Public Utilities. The

Agreement provides for transmission

service under the T–1 Transmission

Tariff, FERC Original Volume No. 4.

WPSC asks that the agreement become

effective June 1, 1995.

Comment date: March 21, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

5. The United Illuminating Co.

[Docket No. ER95–651–000]

Take notice that on February 27, 1995,

The United Illuminating Company (UI),

157 Church Street, New Haven,

Connecticut, submitted for filing a rate

schedule confirming daily sales of

system power by UI to Fitchburg Gas

and Electric Company between

November 16, 1991 and February 13,

1994. UI has sought waiver of the sixtyday notice requirement under 18 CFR

35.3 to permit an effective date of

November 16, 1991. UI also requests

that the rate schedule terminate on

February 17, 1994.

Comment date: March 21, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

6. Arizona Public Service Co.

[Docket No. ER95–653–000]

Take notice that on February 27, 1995,

Arizona Public Service Company (APS),

tendered for filing a Service Agreement

under APS-FERC Electric Tariff Original

Volume No. 1 (APS Tariff) with the

following entity:

LG&E Power Marketing, Inc.

A copy of this filing has been served

on the above listed entity and the

Arizona Corporation Commission.

Comment date: March 21, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

7. Idaho Power Co.

[Docket No. ER95–654–000]

Take notice that on February 27, 1995,

Idaho Power Company (IPC), tendered

for filing wholesale or transmission

agreements between Idaho Power

Company and Bonneville Power

Administration, Sierra Pacific Power

Company, Utah Associated Municipal

Power Systems and Washington City,

Utah regarding monthly contract

demand values or monthly capacity and

energy values.

IPC has requested waiver of the notice

provisions of § 35.3 of the Commission’s

regulations in order to permit the

revisions to become effective as of

January 1, 1995.

Comment date: March 21, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

8. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.

[Docket No. ER95–655–000]

Take notice that on February 27, 1995,

Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation

(Niagara Mohawk), tendered for filing

an agreement between Niagara Mohawk

and CNG Power Services Corporation

(CNG) dated February 22, 1995

providing for certain transmission

services to CNG.

Copies of this filing were served upon

CNG and the New York State Public

Service Commission.

Comment date: March 21, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

9. Jersey Central Power & Light Co.,

Metropolitan Edison Co., Pennsylvania

Electric Co.

[Docket No. ER95–656–000]

Take notice that on February 28, 1995,

GPU Service Corporation (GPU), on

behalf of Jersey Central Power & Light

Company, Metropolitan Edison

Company and Pennsylvania Electric

Company (jointly referred to as the GPU

Operating Companies), filed an

executed Service Agreement between

GPU and Catex Vitol Electric Inc. (Catex

Vitol), dated February 15, 1995. This

Service Agreement specifies that Catex

Vitol has agreed to the rates, terms and

conditions of the GPU Operating

Companies’ Operating Capacity and/or

Energy Sales Tariff (Sales Tariff)

designated as FERC Electric Tariff,

Original Volume No. 1. The Sales Tariff

was accepted by the Commission by

letter order issued on February 10, 1995

in Jersey Central Power & Light Co.,

Metropolitan Edison Co. and

Pennsylvania Electric Co., Docket No.

ER95–276–000 and allows GPU and

Catex Vitol to enter into separately

scheduled transactions under which the

GPU Operating Companies will make

available for sale, surplus operating

capacity and/or energy at negotiated

rates that are no higher than the GPU

Operating Companies’ cost of service.

GPU requests a waiver of the

Commission’s notice requirements for

good cause shown and an effective date

of February 15, 1995 for the Service

Agreement.

GPU has served copies of the filing on

regulatory agencies in New Jersey and

Pennsylvania.

Comment date: March 21, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

10. Sierra Pacific Power Co.

[Docket No. ER95–657–000]

Take notice that on February 28, 1995,

Sierra Pacific Power Company (Sierra)

tendered for filing pursuant to Part 35

et seq. of the Commission’s regulations,

the Electric Service Agreement dated

February 27, 1995 (the Agreement)

between Sierra and Truckee Donner

Public Utility District (the District).

Sierra states that the Agreement

provides for a continuation of the

existing firm electric service by Sierra to

the District, but at rates that reflect a

revenue reduction for such service. The

Agreement provides for commencement

of service thereunder as of March 1,

1995 or such later date as the

Commission permits the filing to be

effective. Sierra requests waiver of the

60-day notice requirement of section

205 of the Federal Power Act to provide

for a March 1, 1995 effective date. While

Sierra states its belief that no other

waivers of the Act or the Commission’s

rules or regulations are necessary to

make effective the Agreement pursuant

to its terms, Sierra requests any such

waiver necessary or desirable for that

purpose.

Sierra asserts that the filing has been

served on the District and on the

regulatory commissions of Nevada and

California.

Comment date: March 21, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

11. Montaup Electric Co.

[Docket No. ER95–658–000]

Take notice that on February 28, 1995,

Montaup Electric Company tendered for

filing an annual report titled

Conservation and Load Management

Informational Report Proposed

Surcharge—February 28, 1995—

supporting surcharges for the period

March 1, 1995 through February 28,

1996. This annual report filing is

required under a conservation and load

management (C&LM) clause applied to

service to Montaup’s affiliated M-rate

customers as amended by Montaup in a

filing approved by the Commission on

May 4, 1993 in Docket No. ER93–79–

000. The informational report shows the

surcharges that will be required to true

up collections for the twelve months

ended December 31, 1994 with actual

C&LM costs during that period.
13718 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 49 / Tuesday, March 14, 1995 / Notices

Comment date: March 21, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

12. Tucson Electric Power Co.

[Docket No. ER95–659–000]

Take notice that on February 28, 1995,

Tucson Electric Power Company

(Tucson), tendered for filing (i) Service

Schedule D, Power Exchange

Agreement, between Tucson and M–S–

R Public Power Agency (MSR) and (ii)

Service Schedule E, Reserve Sharing,

between Tucson and MSR. Service

Schedule D and Service Schedule E

were entered into pursuant to an

Interconnection Agreement, dated as of

September 20, 1982, Docket No. ER82–

828–000. Service Schedule D provides

for an exchange of capacity and energy

between Tucson and MSR in which

MSR will deliver its capacity and energy

entitlement in San Juan Unit 4 to TEP

at San Juan in exchange for a like

amount of capacity and energy

deliverable by Tucson at certain

delivery points on Tucson’s system.

Service Schedule E provides for a

reserve sharing arrangement involving

MSR’s San Juan capacity rights and

Tucson’s San Juan capacity rights which

will enable the parties to reduce their

respective reserve requirements. Tucson

requests an effective date of May 1,

1995.

Copies of this filing have been served

upon all parties affected by this

proceeding.

Comment date: March 21, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs

E. Any person desiring to be heard or

to protest said filing should file a

motion to intervene or protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street NE.,

Washington, DC 20426, in accordance

with Rules 211 and 214 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR

385.214). All such motions or protests

should be filed on or before the

comment date. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–6178 Filed 3–13–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

[Docket Nos. CP94–682–000 and CP94–682–

001]

Southern Natural Gas Company;

Availability of the Environmental

Assessment for the Proposed

Cleveland Branch Line Project

March 8, 1995.

The staff of the Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission (FERC or

Commission) has prepared this

environmental assessment (EA) on the

natural gas pipeline facilities proposed

by Southern Natural Gas Company

(Southern) in the above dockets.

The EA was prepared to satisfy the

requirements of the Natural

Environmental Policy Act. The staff

concludes that approval of the proposed

project, with appropriate mitigating

measures, would not constitute a major

Federal action significantly affecting the

quality of the human environment.

The EA assesses the potential

environmental effects of the

construction and operation of

Southern’s proposed Cleveland Branch

Line Project, which includes the

following facilities:

• About 20.2 miles of 12-inchdiameter pipeline in Catoosa and

Whitfield Counties, Georgia, and

Hamilton and Bradley Counties,

Tennessee. This pipeline, referred to as

the ‘‘Cleveland Branch Line’’, would

extend from milepost 101.44 on

Southern’s existing 12-inch Chattanooga

Branch Line in Catoosa County, Georgia,

to a proposed interconnection owned by

East Tennessee Natural Gas Company in

Bradley County, Tennessee;

• One new meter station in Bradley

County. The meter station would consist

of two 6-inch meter runs, pressure

regulators, flow control values, about

125 feet of miscellaneous buried piping,

and an 8-foot by 10-foot instrumentation

building; and

• One 1,452-horsepower turbine

compressor unit and other facilities at

Southern’s existing McConnells

Compressor Station in Tuscaloosa

County, Alabama.

Southern indicates that proposed

facilities would deliver a total firm and

interruptible transportation service to

nine municipal gas districts and two

distribution companies in eastern

Tennessee. These customers would

receive about 11,350 thousand cubic

feet per day of firm transportation from

Southern.

The EA has been placed in the public

files of the FERC and is available for

public inspection at: Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission, Public

Reference and Files Maintenance

Branch, 941 North Capitol Street, N.E.,

Room 3104, Washington, D.C. 20426,

(202) 208–1371.

Copies of this EA have been mailed to

Federal, state and local agencies, public

interest groups, interested individuals,

newspapers, and parties to this

proceeding.

A limited number of copies of the EA

are available from: Ms. Alisa Lykens,

Environmental Project Manager,

Environmental Review and Compliance

Branch I, Office of Pipeline Regulation,

Room 7312, 825 North Capitol Street

NE., Washington, D.C. 20426, (202) 208–

0766.

Any person wishing to comment on

the EA may do so. Written comments

must reference Docket Nos. CP94–682–

000 and CP94–682–001. Comments

should be addressed to: Office of the

Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission, 825 North Capitol Street,

NE., Washington, D.C. 20426.

Comments should be filed as soon as

possible, but must be received no later

than April 10, 1995, to ensure

consideration prior to a Commission

decision on this proposal. A copy of any

comments should be sent to Ms. Alisa

Lykens, Environmental Project Manager,

at the above address.

Comments will be considered by the

Commission but will not serve to make

the commentor a party to the

proceeding. Any person seeking to

become a party to the proceeding must

file a motion to intervene pursuant to

Rule 214 of the Commission’s Rules of

Practice and Procedure (18 CFR

385.214).

The date for filing timely motions to

intervene in this proceeding has passed.

Therefore, parties now seeking to file

late interventions must show good

cause, as required by § 385.214(b)(3),

why this time limitation should be

waived. Environmental issues have been

reviewed as good cause for late

intervention. You do not need

intervener status to have your comments

considered.

Additional information about this

project is available from Ms. Alisa

Lykens, Environmental Review and

Compliance Branch I, Office of Pipeline

Regulation, at (202) 208–0766.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–6179 Filed 3–13–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. CP89–661–030]

Algonquin Gas Transmission Co.,

Notice of Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

March 8, 1995.

Take notice that on March 3, 1995,

Algonquin Gas Transmission Company