alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 24, 2017

t0117 

# Order

Clerk January 24, 2017

153828

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN

, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 153828

COA: 324018

Wayne CC: 14

- 000152

- FC

THEODORE PAUL WAFER,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 5, 2016

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral

argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.305(H)(1).

The par ties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order

addressing whether the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s request for a jury instruction

on the rebuttable presumption at MCL 780.951(1) of the self

- defense act violated the

defendant’s rights to present a defense and to a properly instructed jury. The parties

should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.
# ASC Summary

# 8484200000
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2634

C.H. Hanson Co:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AU GUST 1, 2018

NO. 03

- 18

- 00252

- CV

Michael Hervey, Appellant

v.

Enerpipe, Ltd., Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 200TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICE S GOODWIN AND FIELD

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court o n May 20, 2016. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error in the

judgment . Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s judgment

. A ppellant shall pay all costs

relating to this appeal, bo th in this Court and the court below.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 7 (Wednesday, January 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 2745]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-626]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-114-000]


Colorado Interstate Gas Company; Filing of Report on Utilization 
of Storage

January 5, 1995.
    Take notice that on December 30, 1994, as required by the 
Commission's Orders issued April 22, 1993,\1\ and September 3, 1993,\2\ 
in Docket No. RS92-4-000, Colorado Interstate Gas Company (CIG), 
submits for filing its report on utilization of storage, utilization of 
upstream capacity, and development of market centers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 63 FERC (CCH) para.61,101 (1993).
    \2\ 64 FERC (CCH) para.61,227 (1993).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    CIG states that the report shows CIG's level of retained storage 
and upstream capacity (principally on Wyoming Interstate Company Ltd.) 
are essential to system operations.
    CIG states that it began service under the Commission's Order No. 
636 on October 1, 1993.
    CIG states that copies of the filing have been served upon each 
person designated on the official service list complied by the 
Secretary in this proceeding.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426, in accordance with Rules 214 and 211 of the Commission's Rules 
of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR Sections 385.214 and 385.211). All 
motions or protests should be filed on or before January 27, 1995. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-626 Filed 1-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
exv4wxayxiiiy







Exhibit 4(a)(iii)




	 				
	
	 	Life Insurance Company (U.S.A.)
	 	[Bloomfield Hills, Michigan]1






	 	 	 

	CONTRACTHOLDER

	 	[Financial Institution]
	 
	 	 
	CONTRACT NUMBER

	 	[12345]






GROUP ANNUITY



The John Hancock Life Insurance Company (U.S.A.) (“the Company”, “we”, “our”) agrees, subject to
the conditions and provisions of the certificate, to provide the benefits, rights and privileges as
stated in the certificate. A certificate evidencing participation under this contract will be
issued to each member of the eligible group from which we received the required premium
contribution.



This contract is issued in consideration of the master application for this contract.



Signed for the Company at Boston, Massachusetts:




	 	 	 	 	 

	
	 	 	 	
	President
	 	 	 	Secretary






Group Annuity

Nonparticipating — Not eligible for dividends




Administrative Office

[601 Congress Street

Boston, Massachusetts 02210]



					
	 	 	 	 	 
	09GRPMAST
	 	 
	 	GP0101






 









 






Contract Provisions




Section





1. Eligibility/Cessation of Participation




2. Certificates




3. Incorporation




4. Termination



			
	 	 	 
	
	 	GP0201






2









 






1. ELIGIBILITY/CESSATION OF PARTICIPATION



A person who is a customer of the contractholder to which this contract is issued may become a
Certificate Owner upon Our approval and receipt of the required premium contribution.




2. CERTIFICATES



We will issue an individual certificate to each Certificate Owner. The certificate will state the
terms, conditions, and benefits of this contract. We may credit interest to Certificate Owners at
rates that vary by certificate issue date, premium amount, or eligible class.




3. INCORPORATION



A sample certificate attached hereto is made a part of this contract. Any provisions of this
contract which are inconsistent with provisions of the certificate are waived and superseded by the
certificate provisions.




4. TERMINATION



This contract will terminate when the contractholder requests termination in writing to us or when
no Certificate Owners hold any certificate issued under this contract.



Any certificates in force when the contract terminates will continue to be in force in accordance
with our administrative rules in effect, until terminated by the Certificate Owner.




			
	 	 	 
	 
	 	GP0301







3
| |             
| | ------------
| | Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Jingjun Hu, the Chief Executive Officer of HONG KONG WINALITE GROUP, INC. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

1. The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this 14th day of November 2008.



| | /s/ Jingjun Hu
Jingjun Hu
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Hong Kong Winalite Group, Inc. and will be retained by Hong Kong Winalite Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

---
T O THE C OURT O F C RIMINAL A PPEALS

No. 01

- 13

- 01028

- CR

L ESLE M ARKLE

Appeal from Cause Number 1865367

From the County Criminal Court No. 12

Harris County

vs.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS

A PP ELLANT ’ S M OTION T O E XTEND T IME T O F ILE PDR

T O T HE H ONORABLE J UDGES O F T HE C OURT O F C RIMINAL A PPEALS :

C OMES N OW

, L ESLE M ARKLE

, and files this Motion to Extend Time to File PDR , and

in support thereof, would respectfully show the Court the following:

I.

The First Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s judgment in an opinion styled

Markle v. State, 01

- 13

- 01028

- CR, 2015 WL 505194 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.]

Feb. 5, 2015, no. pet. h.)

. No other motions for extension have been filed.

II.

In compliance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.2(c), this motion for

extension is timely filed within 15 days of the original deadline for the PDR, which

was March 9, 2015

. Appellant requests this extension due to the fact that counsel for

Appellant has been engaged in work in the Harris County Public Defender’s Office

on many cases, including the following:

 Lenin Lo

pez, 01

- 13

- 01079

- CR, reversed and set for retrial in cause #1403196

 Vincent William, # 1420283

 Darryle Robertson, 14

- 15

- 00132

- CR

 Rodney Robins, 01

- 14

- 00582

- CR

 Craig Beal, 01

- 12

- 00896

- CR PD-0287-15

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 3/16/2015 10:01:30 AM

Accepted 3/18/2015 3:06:24 PM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK Abner Washington, 01

- 14

- 00885

- CR

 Forest Penton, 14

- 14

- 00406

- CR

 Leonard Storemski, 14

- 14

- 00920

- CR

 Counsel has been researching and writing for several trial cases assigned to the

Public Defender’s Office Trial Division.

III.

Appellee ’s attorney requests an extension of 30 days

, which is necessary so that the

PDR can be thoro ughly written and timely filed. This motion is not made for the

purpose of delay.

PRAYER

W HEREFORE

, P REMISES C ONSIDERED

, Appellee prays that this Honorable Court

grants this requested extensi on of time to file the PDR in the above cause and extend

the time for filing to April 16 , 2015

.

Respectfully submitted,

A LEXANDER B UNIN

Chief Public Defender

Harris County, Texas

/s/ Sarah V. Wood

S ARAH V. W OOD

Assistant Public Defender

Harris County, Texas

Texas Bar Number 24048898

1201 Franklin, 13 th Floor

Houston Texas 77002

713.368.0016 (phone)

713.368.9278 (fax)

Sarah.Wood@pdo.hctx.netC ERTIFICATE OF S ERVICE

By my signature below, I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of t h e above and

foregoing Appellant ’s Motion to Extend Time to File PDR has been served via the

efile service on the Harris County District Attorney’s Office.

/s/ Sarah V. Wood

Sarah V. Wood
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

. 

6 
Honorable Charles Ii. Slaughter - page 2 

Whoever 0 * i (lb) for a oozudd4tration, 

reward or peouniary benef%t, prosent or anticipated, dlreat or indkreot, adrises or 

coun~3l4 anoth5r 56 to mmular law, or ~drave 

a paper, docmant or ln5truwnt affecting or 

relating to secular rip;htsj + * + or (d) for 

a consideration, diruat or inUreat, gives 

an opinion 80 to th% vaufuty of th4 t&tile 

to real or personal prop4rts,~* 0 * AS praothling law** 

skaoh of the sots eaumrated’by you sppeax+ clearly to t‘allrithinthis def'i&tionof prsOtioe oilrcr.Your 

intpiry does not dleolose, hmsmr, ex?ept inferent%ally, 

that th4 llotary FubUo ptwSorms the wte'for 8 peouubry 

benefit vithin the oaanirq of the Act,, ~0~ t&r& he is not 

aduly lismwmdlawyer. ue a%nllnbe esdr of these to ba 

true. 

A Eotibry Publio ia a piablh ofYio6r under authority of the, &It&e appointed for a def%zdte time, requirea 

by lau to subscribe to sll atkia%al oath anB to exeaute an 

oiiiaial box@. 

Els daltiee SC8 - by lw 8s the,foning ,a9 

aoknow1eaapbntc or predo OP trit~tia inew ; pmitenb 

ing InatrurPantcr perPatted by; 10~ to be +bt&qted, adsdniaterhg oaths,~emd taking deposlt&onS, @as 1s ati or mtsy 

hereafter be wnt'erred by law upon County clerka~il (?iw. 

0%~. 6th. Art. 6964). 

Hone of the ectivitlcso mentioned by you cope 

ui,h& the awpo of the ofTiM.el duties of such Ifotaiy 

. 

This Department has had b4for4 St the quest&on 

of the unlawful paotios of law in the follorrlnp easea: 

In Opsnion Ho. 0438% we OoneSdemd a crontracrt 

by a bond broker with a county to work out a suhedule of 

the amount 4nil type of bond to be sold,for the particular 

projeat mqgested by the county, and t&n to proaure the 

servic4s of 5n attorney to prgpnve tbs wmLou4 otier4, 

nstioes and other instz=unkmte reqwlred to make up the 

transoript of the bond pxwwe+qs prelimixxary to the 

obtainini: of an o@.n%on of validity from the Attorney 

Qeneralj likewise, to furnish the opinion of e reeogniwd bond attorney. The contra& w&w held to be illeiwl afi the umuthorised psotioe of law. 
Iionorable Ciharlos ii. Slaughhtor - page 3 

In Opition Ho. 0-2233 we held that 8 Local 

attorney would be violatin& Article 4308 by fllkng applications of foreign corporations for perreits to do 

business in Texas for and on behalf of a corporation 

system which Is unauthorized to practice law in the 

State of Texas. 

In OpLnioa No. c1-l860 wo 4dvleti the County 

Attorney of Basque Oounty that a contra& by a printing corporation agreeing *to peepare the le al proeeedlags necessary to be cxecufed in yoting snd 7 or outhorlel.ng the 100uanc0 Of the propowd t3emlritfsrr,~ YW illogal and void a5 in v%ol,ation of the statute under 

ooIl4iderafion. 

! Upon the statutes, oone3.derations, 81~3 rulings 

sbovo stated, you are respeotfully rdrieed that the aot.lvities of the Sotary Publlo mentioned by you would be in 

/ riolation o? Article 430a of Yernon@e Penal Oode of Texas.
Michigan Supreme 

Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 13, 2015

Order 

January 13, 2015

149259(83)(86)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v

BRANDON LEWIS CAIN,

Defendant-Appellee.

SC: 149259

COA: 314342

Wayne CC: 12-005176-FC

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the defendant-appellee to extend the 

time to file his brief on appeal with an amended page 1 is GRANTED. The brief 

submitted on January 5, 2015, is accepted for filing. On further order of the Chief 

Justice, the motion of the Deputy Solicitor General of the Department of Attorney 

General to participate in oral argument by sharing ten minutes of the Wayne County 

Prosecutor’s allotted time for argument is GRANTED.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 7 (Wednesday, January 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 2751]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-640]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Huntington Bancshares Incorporated, et al.; Formations of; 
Acquisitions by; and Mergers of Bank Holding Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied for the Board's 
approval under section 3 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 
1842) and Sec.  225.14 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.14) to 
become a bank holding company or to acquire a bank or bank holding 
company. The factors that are considered in acting on the applications 
are set forth in section 3(c) of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Each application is available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. Once the application has been accepted 
for processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing to the Reserve Bank or to the offices of the Board of 
Governors. Any comment on an application that requests a hearing must 
include a statement of why a written presentation would not suffice in 
lieu of a hearing, identifying specifically any questions of fact that 
are in dispute and summarizing the evidence that would be presented at 
a hearing.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received not later than February 3, 1995.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland (John J. Wixted, Jr., Vice 
President) 1455 East Sixth Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44101:
    1. Huntington Bancshares Incorporated, Columbus, Ohio; to acquire 
100 percent of the voting shares of Security National Corporation, 
Maitland, Florida, and thereby indirectly acquire Security National 
Bank, Maitland, Florida.
    In connection with this application, Huntington Bancshares of 
Florida, Inc., Columbus, Ohio, has applied to become a bank holding 
company.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Zane R. Kelley, Vice President) 
104 Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303:
    1. Synovus Financial Corp., Columbus, Georgia; and TB&C Bancshares, 
Inc., Columbus, Georgia, to merge with Citizens & Merchants 
Corporation, Douglasville, Georgia, and thereby indirectly acquire 
Citizens & Merchants State Bank, Douglasville, Georgia.
    C. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Randall C. Sumner, Vice 
President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166:
    1. Old National Bancorp, Evansville, Indiana; to merge with 
Citizens National Bank Corporation, Tell City, Indiana, and thereby 
indirectly acquire The Citizens National Bank of Tell City, Tell City, 
Indiana.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 5, 
1995
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-640 Filed 1-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 51 (Thursday, March 16, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 14279]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6457]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Project No. 11346-001 Iowa]


FORIA Hydro Corp.; Notice of Availability of Final Environmental 
Assessment

March 10, 1995.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission's) 
regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No. 486, 525 FR. 47897), the Office 
of Hydropower Licensing has reviewed the application for minor license 
for the proposed Fort Dodge Mill Dam Hydroelectric Project, located on 
the Des Moines River, Webster County, Iowa, and has prepared a Final 
Environmental Assessment (FEA) for the project. In the FEA, the 
Commission's staff has analyzed the potential environmental impacts of 
the existing project and has concluded that approval of the project, 
with appropriate mitigation measures, would not constitute a major 
federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human 
environment.
    Copies of the FEA are available for review in the Public Reference 
Branch, Room 3104, of the Commission's offices at 941 North Capitol 
Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary
[FR Doc. 95-6457 Filed 3-15-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2953

Price Pump Company:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
April 1, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

BRANDON JAMES HICKS, Appellant

NO. 14-13-00656-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.