alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Dairy Forage Research: Madison, WI
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Madison, Wisconsin U.S. Dairy Forage Research Center Dairy Forage Research Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Research Projects Subjects of Investigation at this LocationEach ARS research project has related subjects of investigation.  Listed below are the subjects of investigation currently conducted at this location.
Clicking on a subject of investigation will list the research projects within that  subject of investigation.Subjects of Investigation
                            Air
                                Alfalfa
                                Bacteria
                                Climate
                                Cross-commodity research--multiple crops
                                Dairy cattle, live animal
                                Pasture
                                Pasture and forage crops, general/other
                                Red clover
                                Soil
                                Water resources
                                Weather


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          40,656
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   47,778
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,188
<INVENTORY>                                     44,729
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               145,831
<PP&E>                                          42,392
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,930
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 198,065
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,735
<BONDS>                                         30,269
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           174
<OTHER-SE>                                     131,610
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   198,065
<SALES>                                        144,688
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               144,688
<CGS>                                           82,842
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                69,115
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,707
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (8,133)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (2,951)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (5,182)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (28,564)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (33,746)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (2.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (2.18)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>
          
<ARTICLE>               5
                
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            12-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                        Dec-31-1996
<CASH>                                  350,772
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                         1,089,063
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      1,573,048
<PP&E>                               24,804,033
<DEPRECIATION>                       16,201,676
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       12,932,327
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 2,294,705
<BONDS>                               2,738,640
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                              2,000,000
<OTHER-SE>                            8,055,613
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         12,932,327
<SALES>                               7,111,558
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      7,742,074
<CGS>                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         3,090,744
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        155,735
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      452,493
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       1,882,790
<INCOME-TAX>                            445,116
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   1,437,674
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                          1,437,674
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             16.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                             16.06
                        
                

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
   
    We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-72324) pertaining to the Midisoft Corporation Incentive Stock
Option Plan and Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan of our report dated March 13,
1997, with respect to the financial statements of Midisoft Corporation included
in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1997.
    
 
   
                                          ERNST & YOUNG LLP
    
 
Seattle, Washington
 
   
April 28, 1998
**Exhibit
10.15**
   **GENEREX
BIOTECHNOLOGY CORPORATION**
  **ANNUAL
BASE SALARIES FOR CERTAIN EXECUTIVE OFFICERS EFFECTIVE AUGUST 1,
2004**
  The
annual base salaries for certain executive officers of Generex Biotechnology
Corporation (the “Company”) effective as of August 1, 2004, as approved by the
Board of Directors of the Company, are set forth in the following
table:
  **Executive
      Officer**
    
    **Position**
    
    **Annual
      Base Salary**
      **(USD)**Anna
      E. Gluskin
    
    President
      and Chief Executive Officer
    
    $425,000Rose
      C. Perri
    
    Chief
      Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and
      Secretary
    
    $325,000Mark
      A. Fletcher
    
    Executive
      Vice-President and General Counsel
    
    $250,000
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2339

Reelcraft Industries:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 50 (Wednesday, March 15, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 14040]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6316]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE


Notice of Meeting of the Industry Policy Advisory Committee

agency: Office of the United States Trade Representative.

agency: Notice that the March 22, 1995 meeting of the Industry Policy 
Advisory Committee will be held from 9:30 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. The meeting 
will be closed to the public from 9:30 to 1:00 p.m. The meeting will be 
open to the public from 1:00 p.m. to 2:30 p.m.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

summary: The Industry Policy Advisory Committee will hold a meeting on 
March 22, 1995 from 9:30 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. The meeting will be closed 
to the public from 9:30 to 1:00 p.m. The meeting will include a review 
and discussion of current issues which influence U.S. trade policy. 
Pursuant to Section 2155(f)(2) of Title 19 of the United States Code, I 
have determined that this portion of the meeting will be concerned with 
matters the disclosure of which would seriously compromise the 
development by the United States Government of trade policy, 
priorities, negotiating objectives or bargaining positions with respect 
to the operation of any trade agreement and other matters arising in 
connection with the development, implementation and administration of 
the trade policy of the United States. The meeting will be open to the 
public and press from 1:00 p.m. to 2:30 p.m. when trade policy issues 
will be discussed. Attendance during this part of the meeting is for 
observation only. Individuals who are not members of the committee will 
not be invited to comment.

dates: The meeting is scheduled for March 22, 1995, unless otherwise 
notified.

Addresses The meeting will be held at the Madison Hotel, located at 
15th and M streets, NW., Washington, DC., unless otherwise notified.

for further information contact: Michaelle Burstin, Director of Public 
Liaison, Office of the United States Trade Representative, (202) 395-
6120.
Michael Kantor,
United States Trade Representatives.
[FR Doc. 95-6316 Filed 3-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3190-01-M
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 February 14, 2019

Order 

Clerk

February 14, 2019

159104(27)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 159104

v COA: 344764

Emmet CC: 14-003969-FC

TREVOR JAMES CARRIER, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellant to exceed the page 

limit for his application for leave to appeal is GRANTED.
#### STATE v. BEATRICE SIMMERSON.

(Filed 13 April, 1932.)

Criminal Raw R d — Appeal in this case is dismissed for insufficiency of the record.

Where a certified copy of the record proper has not been filed on appeal in 'a criminal action, the transcript containing only a statement of case on appeal accepted by the solicitor, which fails to contain the indictment or to show that the trial court had jurisdiction, the appeal will be dismissed, Rule 19, no motion for *certiorari*having been made and the Supreme Court not ordering the writ to issue in its discretion.

Appeal by defendant from *Harwood, Special Judge,*at December Term, 1931, of Foesyth.

Appeal dismissed.

The defendant was tried and convicted in the Superior Court of For-syth County of having -intoxicating liquor in her possession, in violation of the statute. N. C. Code of 1931, section 3411(b). •

From the judgment on such conviction, defendant appealed to the Supreme Court, assigning errors in the trial.

*584
      *Attorney-General Brummiit and Assistant Attorney-G-eneral Seawell for the State.*

*Wallace & Wall for defendant.*

CONNOR, J.

A certified copy of tbe record proper in tbis action bas not been filed in tbis Court, as required by its rules. Rule 19. Tbe transcript contains only a statement of tbe case on appeal prepared by counsel for the defendant, and accepted by tbe solicitor for tbe State. No indictment appears therein; nor does it appear tbat tbe defendant was tried and convicted on a warrant issued by an inferior court, and tbat sbe appealed from tbe judgment of sueb court to tbe Superior Court. There is nothing in tbe transcript which shows tbat tbe Superior Court of Forsyth County bad jurisdiction of tbe action.

In *S. v. McDraughon,*168 N. C., 131, 83 S. E., 181, it is said: “Tbe presumption is tbat tbe judgment of tbe Superior Court is correct, and tbe burden is on tbe appellant to show error. As far back as *S. v. Butts,*91 N. C., 524, tbe requisites of tbe transcript were pointed out, and in *S. v. Frizell,*111 N. C., 725, tbe Court said: 'An appellant does not do bis duty by simply taking an appeal and leaving it to tbe clerk to send up what be may deem necessary. It is tbe appellant’s duty to see tbat tbe record is properly and sufficiently made up and transmitted.’ ”

There is no motion for *certiorari*in tbis appeal, and in tbe exercise of our discretion, we do not order tbat such writ issue in tbis case. The appeal is dismissed. *Pruitt v. Wood,*199 N. C., 788, 156 S. E., 126.

Appeal dismissed.
September 15, 2016



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

JIM RICHARDSON, RICH ARDSON OUTDOOR ADVER TISING, INC.

, AND

ACTION DISPLAY, INC. , Appellant s

NO. 14

- 16

- 00041

- CV V.

MH OUTDOOR MEDIA, LL C , Appellee

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the “Order Denying Richardson Defendants’ Special Appearances,” signed January 11, 2016, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the trial court’s ruling

. We order the ruling of the court below AFFIRMED

. We order appellant s , Jim Richardson, Richardson Outdoor Advertising, Inc.

, and Action Display, Inc., jointly and severally, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
| (1)   | the                annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Capital City Energy Group, Inc. for                the                year ended October 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements                of                Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the                information contained in the annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the                year                ended October 31, 2007, fairly presents in all material respects,                the                financial condition and results of operations of Capital City Energy                Group, Inc.. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/              Jennie Slade                                                                      |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Name:  | Jennie              Slade                                                                          |
| Title: | Principal                Executive Officer,Principal                Financial Officer and Director |
| Date:  | January                28, 2008                                                                    |
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FE BRUARY 4 , 2015

NO. 03

- 13

- 00502

- CV

Roderick Lee Mitchell, M.D., Appellant

v.

Texas Medical Board, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 126TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PU RYEAR, GOODWIN, AND FIELD

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court on July 17, 2013. Having reviewed

the record and th e parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment . Therefore, the C ourt affirms the judgment

. The appellant shall pay all

costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
#### MRS. L. E. KAYLOR v. B. E. SAIN.

(Filed 31 October, 1934.)

Trespass B c — Evidence of forcible trespass held insufficient.

Evidence tending to show rudeness of language or a slight demonstration of force against which ordinary firmness is sufficient protection is insufficient to sustain an action for trespass against the person or possession of plaintiff.

Appeal by the plaintiff from *Oglesby, J.,*at February Term, 1934, of Burgee.

Affirmed.

This was an action for an alleged assault and forcible trespass committed by the defendant against the plaintiff. The plaintiff’s evidence tended to show that the defendant went to a house owned by him and in which the plaintiff was living and asked her when she and her husband were going to vacate the house, stating he would give her seven days to move, and accompanied such inquiry and statement with rude and, by innuendo, threatening language, and with “popping his fists”; that all the while the defendant was on the outside and the plaintiff was on the inside of a wire screen door; and that the defendant, when asked to leave the premises, did so immediately. When the plaintiff had introduced her evidence and rested her case, the court, upon motion of the defendant, dismissed the action and entered judgment as of nonsuit.

*Isaac T. Avery and Hatcher & Berry for appellant.*

*Mull & Patton for appellee.*

Per Curiam.

“The act complained of must have been with a strong hand, *'manu*forti/ and this implies the exercise of greater force than is expressed by the words *‘vi et*armis/ Rudeness of language, mere words, *313or even a slight demonstration of force against which ordinary firmness is a sufficient protection will not constitute the offense.” *Anthony v. Protective Union,*206 N. C., 7 (11), and cases there cited.

. We are of the opinion that the evidence was insufficient to sustain an action for trespass against the person or possession of the plaintiff and, therefore, his Honor was correct in granting the motion for judgment as in case of nonsuit.

Affirmed.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2030

Reelcraft Industries:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn