U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Livestock Bio-Systems: Clay Center, NE
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    USMARC Home
                    USMARC Research Units
                        Genetics and Animal Breeding
                                    Meat Safety & Meat Quality
                                    Nutrition, Growth and Physiology
                                    Animal Health GenomicsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Clay Center, Nebraska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center Livestock Bio-Systems Research Publications at this Location





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications
- IACUC Summaries

Title:   Author  item
                                            Vallet, Jeffitem
                                            Leymaster, Kregitem
                                            Cassady, Joseph

                                                         - *Joe*item
                                            Christenson, Ronald
  Submitted to: Journal of Animal Science Supplement
                                    Publication Type: Abstract Only
                                    Publication Acceptance Date: 2/15/2001
                                    Publication  Date: 12/20/2001
                                    Citation: Vallet, J.L., Leymaster, K.A., Cassady, J.P., Christenson, R.K. 2001. Are hematocrit and placental efficiency selection tools for uterine capacity in swine? [abstract]. Journal of Animal Science. 79(Supplement 2):89. (Abstract No. 257)Interpretive Summary:
                                Technical Abstract: It has been proposed that low fetal hematocrit (HC) contributes to the poor survival of crowded fetuses and that placental efficiency (PE, fetal weight (FW)/placental weight (PW)) can be used to select for uterine capacity. These traits were measured in control (C), ovulation rate (OR), and uterine capacity (UC)  selected lines.  HC was greater (P<.01) in UC (38.5 +/- .25%) and less (P<.01) in OR (35.4 +/- .22%) than C (37.2 +/- .23%). PE was greater (P<.05) in OR (4.66 +/- .05) than UC and C (4.46 +/- .06 and 4.36 +/- .05), which did not differ. Heritabilites (h2) for HC, FW, PW, and PE were .11, .05, .18 and .29, respectively. Thus, PE did not increase in UC. In contrast selection for higher HC may increase uterine capacity. To explore this possibility, HC was measured on 5 piglets from each of 3 litters  at birth, 7 and 24 h after birth. HC was 44.5 +/- .9, 34.3 +/- .9 and 31.7 +/- .9% at birth, 7 h (P<.05), and 24 h. HC was then determined at 12 to 24 h after birth on piglets from the three lines (106 litters). HC was lower (P<.01) for UC (36.2 +/- .6%) and OR (36.4 +/- .5%) than C (38.6 +/- .5) and h2 for HC was .03 +/- .14. Thus, (1) selection for UC did not change PE; (2) selection for UC increased fetal HC and decreased neonatal HC; (3) HC falls during the early postnatal period; (4) h2 of fetal HC is positive but low, and (5) neonatal HC is unlikely to be useful as a selection tool. Alternative methods (e.g., genetic markers, transgenics) to alter fetal HC are needed and may improve fetal survival and litter size.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov