alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 11.1

                                DAW TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

                             EARNINGS PER SHARE CALCULATION

                                Year ended December 31,

<TABLE>
                                                   1996                           1995                          1994
                                         --------------------------    --------------------------    --------------------------
                                          Primary     Fully Diluted     Primary     Fully Diluted      Primary    Fully Diluted
                                         ----------   -------------    ----------   -------------    ----------   -------------
<S>                                      <C>          <C>              <C>          <C>              <C>          <C>
Average number of common shares
 outstanding during the year

  Common shares outstanding
   during the entire year                12,330,254     12,330,254     11,741,254     11,741,254     10,999,170     10,099,170

  Weighted average common shares
   issued during the year                    23,222         23,222        406,583        406,583      1,083,125      1,083,125
                                         ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------
  Weighted average number of
   common shares outstanding             12,353,476     12,353,476     12,147,837      1,147,837     11,182,295     11,182,295

  Dilutive effect of common stock
   equivalents under stock warrants
   and options                               90,372         90,372        190,361        215,324              -        187,606
                                         ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------
  Weighted average common and
   dilutive common equivalent
   shares outstanding                    12,443,848     12,443,848     12,338,198     12,363,161     11,182,295     11,369,901
                                         ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------
                                         ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------
  Net earnings applicable to
   common stock                          $3,310,274     $3,310,274     $  287,147     $  287,147     $2,862,199     $2,862,199
                                         ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------
                                         ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------
  Net earnings per common and
   dilutive common equivalent
   shares outstanding                    $     0.27     $     0.27     $     0.02     $     0.02     $     0.26     $     0.25
                                         ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------
                                         ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------
</TABLE>
#### STATE v. LESLIE THEODORE BROWN.

(Filed 11 November, 1959.)

Appeal by defendant from *Williams, J.,*at March 23, 1959 Term, of Wake.

Criminal prosecution upon warrant issued out of City Court of Raleigh, N. C., charging that defendant Leslie Theodore Brown did willfully, maliciously and unlawfully drive an automobile on the public highways of Raleigh Township and on the public streets of the city while under the influence of intoxicating liquor on the 1800 block of Wilshire Avenue against the statute in such oases made and provided, etc. Tried in City Court of Raleigh and adjudged guilty, and given 60 days suspended upon payment of $100.00 and costs and surrender driver’s license for revocation for 1 year. Notice given of appeal to Superior Court. There defendant pleaded not guilty; but was found guilty by jury, upon which it is adjudged that defendant pay a $100.00 fine and costs.

Defendant appeals therefrom to Supreme Court and assigns error.

*Attorney General Seawell, Assistant Attorney General Claude L. Love for the State.*

*Taylor & Mitchell for defendant, appellant.*

PeR CüRiam.

Defendant assigns in the main two groups of exceptions: (1) As to denial of bis motion to nonsuit; and (2) failure of the court to charge the jury in conformity to provisions of G.S. 1-180. Considering these, the evidence offered -by the State is abundantly sufficient to carry the case to the jury and to support the verdict and judgment rendered. And when the charge given by the court to the jury is read contexually, no prejudicial error appears. Indeed, no reason for disturbing the verdict and judgment is made to appear in the record and ease on appeal.

No error.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 42 (Friday, March 3, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 12004]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5306]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

Office of the Secretary
[Public Notice 2174]


Extension of the Restriction on the Use of United States 
Passports for Travel to, in, or Through Lebanon

    On January 26, 1987, pursuant to the authority of 22 U.S.C. 211a 
and Executive order 12295 (31 FR 10603), and in accordance with 22 CFR 
51.73(a)(3), all United States passports, with the exception of 
passports of immediate family members of hostages in Lebanon, were 
declared invalid for travel to, in, or through Lebanon unless 
specifically validated for such travel. This action was taken because 
the situation in Lebanon was so chaotic that American citizens there 
could not be considered safe from terrorist acts.
    Although there continues to be improvement in the security 
situation, review of the situation there has led me to conclude that 
Lebanon continues to be an area ``* * * where there is imminent danger 
to the public health or the physical safety of United States 
travelers'' within the meaning of 22 U.S.C. 211a and 22 CFR 
51.73(a)(3).
    Accordingly, all United States passports shall remain invalid for 
travel to, in, or through Lebanon unless specifically validated for 
such travel under the authority of the Secretary of State.
    This Public Notice shall be effective upon publication in the 
Federal Register and shall expire at the end of six months unless 
extended or sooner revoked by Public Notice.

    Dated: February 28, 1995.
Warren Christopher,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 95-5306 Filed 3-2-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-M
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 1449** 

MARK JOHNSON, d/b/a JQ Solutions , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,

v. EDWIN WESTLAKE; WESTEV WW COMMODITIES LLC , Defendants

– Appellees

.

Appeal from the United State s District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte

. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. ( 3:10

- cv - 00457

- GCM )

Submitted : August 17, 2011 Decided: September 19, 2011

Before MOTZ and SHEDD , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Sen ior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Mark Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Mark Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his civil complaint for insufficiency of service of process. After the date of that order, but before the effective date of Johnson’s notice of appeal, the district court entered an order vacating the order Johnson seeks to appeal and reopening the case. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4)(A), (B)(i). Thus, the order Johnson seeks to challenge is no longer in effect, and the case is actively proceeding in the district court. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (200 6 ), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (200 6 ); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 , 545

- 46 (1949). In light of the entry by the district court of an order reopening Johnson’s case, t he order Johnson seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequ ately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3995 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3995

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to provide 
      for permanent duty-free treatment on imports of basketballs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 5, 2022

   Mr. Paul introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to provide 
      for permanent duty-free treatment on imports of basketballs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT DUTY-FREE TREATMENT ON IMPORTS OF BASKETBALLS.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 95 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States is amended by inserting in numerical sequence the 
following new subheading, with the article description having the same 
degree of indentation as the article description for subheading 
9506.62.40:

``       9506.62.70       Basketballs........  Free                 ...................  30%                  ''
                                                                                                               .

    (b) Conforming Amendments.--(1) Chapter 95 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States, as amended by subsection (a), is further 
amended by redesignating subheading 9506.62.80 as subheading 
9506.62.81.
    (2) Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule 
of the United States is amended by striking headings 9902.17.75, 
9902.17.76, and 9902.17.77.
    (3) U.S. Note 20(s)(i) to subchapter III of chapter 99 of the 
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by striking 
``9506.62.80'' and by inserting ``9506.62.70'' and ``9506.62.81'' in 
appropriate sequence.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 49 (Tuesday, March 14, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 13737]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6233]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (95-023)]


Intent To Grant an Exclusive Patent License

agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

action: Notice of intent to grant a patent license.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

summary: NASA hereby gives notice of its intent to negotiate with KVH 
Industries, Inc., of Middletown, Rhode Island, an exclusive, royalty-
bearing revocable license to practice the invention described in U.S. 
Patent Application Serial Number 07/999/794, filed November 30, 1992, 
entitled ``Satellite-Tracking Millimeter Wave Reflector Antenna System 
for Mobile Satellite Tracking,'' which will issue on March 14, 1995, to 
the United States of America as represented by the Administrator of the 
National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The proposed license 
agreement will contain appropriate terms, limitations, and conditions 
to be negotiated in accordance with the regulations governing the 
licensing of government-owned inventions as described in 37 CFR part 
404. NASA will negotiate the final terms and conditions and grant the 
exclusive license, unless within 60 days of the date of this Notice, 
the NASA Director of Patent Licensing receives written objections to 
the grant of an exclusive license, together with any supporting 
documentation. The NASA Director of Patent Licensing will review all 
written responses to the notice and then recommend to the Associate 
General Counsel (Intellectual Property) whether or not to grant the 
exclusive license.

dates: Comments to the notice must be received by May 15, 1995.

addresses: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Code GP, 
Washington, DC 20546.

for further information contact: Mr. Harry Lupuloff, NASA, Director of 
Patent Licensing, (202) 358-2041.

    Dated: March 6, 1995.
Edward A. Frankle,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 95-6233 Filed 3-13-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-M
EXHIBIT 23.1

         Consent of Arthur Andersen LLP


         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                                   
                                   
As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
of our report dated November 30, 1995 on the consolidated
balance sheet of Paracelsian, Inc. (a Delaware corporation in the
development stage) and subsidiary as of September 30, 1995, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and
cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended September 30,
1995 and for the period from inception (April 15, 1991) to September 30,
1995 included in this Form 10-KSB, into the Company's previously filed
Registration Statement File No. 333-8333.

                                   /s/Arthur Andersen LLP

Rochester, New York
December 30, 1996




                Consent of Independent Public Accountants

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
of our report dated November 30, 1995 on the consolidated balance sheet of
Paracelsian, Inc. (a Delaware corporation in the development stage) and
subsidiary as of September 30, 1995, and the related consolidated statements
of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the two 
years in the period ended September 30, 1995 and for the period from
inception (April 15, 1991) to September 30, 1995 included in this Form
10-KSB, into the Company's previously filed Registration Statement File
No. 333-14215.

                                    /s/Arthur Andersen LLP

Rochester, New York
December 30, 1996


<PAGE>
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

CARLOS VELLOSO

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 1426

[ October 10, 2019 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Tim Bailey , Judge; L.T.

Case No. 062009CF016828B88810

.

Carlos Velloso, Danbury, Connecticut, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ROSS

, D AMOO RGIAN and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<PAGE>
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8/S-3 (File No. 33-48889). Form S-8 (Files No. 33-67456,
33-76152, 33-96114, and 33-65357), Form S-3 (Files No. 33-92796, 333-68770,
333-76934) of i-STAT Corporation of our reports dated March 26, 2002 relating to
the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule, which
appear in this Form 10-K.



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Florham Park, New Jersey
April 1, 2002
April 23 , 2015



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF CLIFFORD LAYNE HARRISON AND CONNIE VASQUEZ H ARRISON AND IN THE J OINT INTEREST OF
JOHN ERNEST LEE HARRISON II, AND VICTORIA MAD ELINE

HARRISON, CHILDREN

,
NO. 14

- 14

- 00915

- CV

________________________________ Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment signed by the court bel ow on October 24, 2014. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2028

Reelcraft Industries:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 10, 2018

No. 04-16-00491-CV

Sam LAJZEROWICZ,

Appellant

v.

Estelita LAJZEROWICZ,

Appellee

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2006-CI-16638

Honorable Stephani A. Walsh, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The appellant’s motion for extension of time to file motion for en banc reconsideration is 

hereby GRANTED. Time is extended to July 18, 2018.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 10th day of July, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


(SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)





In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Fullplay Media Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dennis Tevlin, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:





(1)    The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/S/    DENNIS TEVLIN


---

Dennis Tevlin


Chief Executive Officer


November 13, 2002
EXHIBIT 10.5

CONTINGENT ANNUAL BONUS AGREEMENT

The undersigned employee, Marshall E. Reese
(the Employee), acknowledges and agrees that on December 20, 2006, the Compensation Committee of the POZEN Inc. (the Company) approved, as a part of Employees annual cash bonus for 2006, a contingent
bonus amount of $48,256.00 (the Contingent Bonus) to Employee, payable as described below and subject to the fulfillment of certain conditions as set forth herein. Employee acknowledges and agrees that, pursuant to the
Compensation Committee approval, the Contingent Bonus shall not be paid unless and until the Company has received an action letter from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration indicating approval of the New Drug Application for Trexima, the proposed
brand name for the combination of GlaxoSmithKlines sumatriptan and naproxen sodium in a single tablet being developed by the Company for the acute treatment of migraine pursuant to a development and commercialization agreement with
GlaxoSmithKline (the Trexima Approval) provided that the Trexima Approval is received on or before December 31, 2007 and subject to Employees continuous employment by the Company. If the Trexima Approval is received by
the Company on or before December 31, 2007 and Employee is employed by the Company on the date of receipt of such approval, then the Contingent Bonus shall be paid to Employee on the second business day following the Companys receipt of
the Trexima Approval. Employee further acknowledges and agrees that if the Trexima Approval is not received on or before December 31, 2007 or if the Trexima Approval is received on or before December 31, 2007 but Employee is no longer
employed by the Company on such date, the Contingent Bonus shall be forfeited and Employee shall have no right or entitlement to receive the Contingent Bonus. Employee acknowledges and agrees that in the event of a Change of Control (as defined in
the POZEN Inc. Equity Compensation Plan, as amended and restated) of the Company prior to December 31, 2007 and the receipt of the Trexima Approval, the Compensation Committee, in its sole discretion, may accelerate the payment of the
Contingent Bonus to a time immediately prior to such Change of Control. This Agreement shall be binding upon all successors and assigns of the Company, including any corporation or other entity with which or into which the Company may be merged or
which may succeed to its assets or business.



By:

/s/ Marshall E. ReeseMarshall E. ReesePOZEN INC.By:

/s/ William L. HodgesName:

William L. HodgesTitle:

Senior Vice President, Finance andAdministration, and Chief FinancialOfficer