alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

**LINCARE HOLDINGS INC. ACTIVE SUBSIDIARIES AND****PARTNERSHIPS**
**DELAWARE CORPORATIONS:**
     1)  Alpha Respiratory Inc.
     2)  Gamma Acquisition Inc.
     3)  Health Care Solutions at Home Inc.
     4)  Home-Care Equipment Network Inc.
     5)  Lincare Holdings Inc.
     6)  Lincare Inc.
     7)  Lincare Licensing Inc.
     8)  Lincare Pharmacy Services Inc.
     9)  Lincare Procurement Inc.
     10) Med 4 Home Inc.
**INDIANA CORPORATION:**
     1)  ConvaCare Services Inc.
**MICHIGAN LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY:**
     1)  Healthlink Medical Equipment LLC
**NEW YORK CORPORATION**:
     1)  Lincare of New York Inc.
**OHIO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY:**
     ****1)  Parma Hospital Home Medical LLC
**PENNSYLVANIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY:**
     1)  HCS Lancaster LLC
**SOUTH CAROLINA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP:**
     ****1)  Lincare of Columbia  LP
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2393

Primex Family of Companies:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1




                           METRETEK TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES


Southern Flow Companies, Inc., a Delaware corporation

PowerSecure, Inc., a Delaware corporation
      Industrial Automation, Inc., a North Carolina corporation

Metretek, Incorporated, a Florida corporation
       Metretek Europe Limited, a Great Britain company
       Metretek Contract Manufacturing Company, Inc., a Florida corporation

Marcum Gas Transmission, Inc., a Colorado corporation
       Marcum Capital Resources, Inc., a Colorado corporation

PowerSpring, Inc. a Delaware corporation
       Mercator Energy Incorporated, a Colorado corporation

Marcum Denver, Inc., a Colorado corporation



                                       1
**Exhibit 10.7****AMENDMENT NO. 1****APRIA HEALTHCARE GROUP INC.****1998 NONQUALIFIED STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN**WHEREAS, Apria Healthcare Group Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Apria Healthcare Group Inc. 1998Nonqualified Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”); andWHEREAS, the Company has the right to amend the Plan, and the Company desires to amend the Plan toreflect recent resolutions adopted by its Board of Directors;NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of January 1, 2001, as follows:1. The second sentence of Section 1.4 (b) of the Plan is amended to read as follows:“The maximum number of shares subject to Options and Stock Appreciation Rights that are grantedduring any calendar year to any individual shall be limited to 200,000 shares.”2. Except as amended above, all provisions of the Plan remain in full force and effect and, asamended, the Plan is hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused its duly authorized officer to execute this Amendment tothe Plan on this 31st day of January, 2001.          **APRIA HEALTHCARE GROUP INC.**
<Page>

| | Exhibit 21
| | ----------
| |           

Subsidiaries



Locke Sovran I L.L.C., a New York limited liability company
Locke Sovran I Manager, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
Locke Sovran II L.L.C., a New York limited liability company
Locke Sovran II Manager, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
The Locke Group, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Locke Leasing, LLC, a New York limited liability company
Iskalo Land Holdings, LLC, a New York limited liability company
Sovran Jones Road, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Sovran Congress, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Sovran Cameron, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Sovran Huebner, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Sovran Little Road, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Sovran Granbury, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Sovran Shackelford, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Sovran Manchester, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Sovran DeGaulle, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Sovran Grapevine, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Sovran Washington, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Sovran Meramac, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Sovran Seminole, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-1975

BOMAG Americas, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3087

Hitachi Powdered Metals:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas May 9, 2022
No. 04

- 22

- 00235

- CV
Jim CRAVER, Appellant

v. FAITH LUTHERAN CHURCH,

Appe llee
From the 25th Judicial District Court , Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 21

- 0912

- CV

- E Honorable William D. Old III , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The trial court signed a final appealable order on March 23, 2022 . Because this is an accelerated appeal, the notice of appeal was due by April 12 , 202 2

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 26.1(b). A motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was due by April 27, 2022

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 26.3. Appellant filed his notice of appeal on April 20, 2022

— within the time allowed for filing a motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal. A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal bey ond the time allowed by Rule 26.1 but within the fifteen

- day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time. See Verburgt v. Dorner , 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997) (construing the predecessor to Rule 26). But “once the peri od for granting a motion for extension of time under Rule [26.3] has passed, a party can no longer invoke the appellate court’s jurisdiction.” Id

. Because the notice of appeal was untimely filed but within the fifteen

- day grace period, we ORDER appella nt to file a response presenting a reasonable explanation for failing to file the notice of appeal in a timely manner within 10 days from the date of this order . If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, the appeal will be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c). All other appellate deadlines are suspended until further order of this court._________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 9th day of May, 2022

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ , Clerk of Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

DAVID J. DEAN III,

Petitioner

v.

LAWRENCE COUNTY BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS, CITY OF NEW

CASTLE AND NEW CASTLE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 44 WAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 25th day of May, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 50 (Wednesday, March 15, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 13969]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6281]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force


USAF Scientific Advisory Board Meeting

    The USAF Scientific Advisory Board's Science & Technology Review of 
Advanced Weapons will meet on 3-7 April 1995 at Kirtland AFB, NM from 
8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    The purpose of the meeting is to fulfill the yearly SAB Science and 
Technology Review in the area of Advanced Weapons.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with Section 
552b of Title 5, United States Code, specifically subparagraphs (1) and 
(4) thereof.
    For further information, contact the Scientific Advisory Board 
Secretariat at (703) 697-8845.
Patsy J. Conner,
Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-6281 Filed 3-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3910-01-P
Ex-99.1 a)


                         Independent Accountants' Report



The Board of Directors
Liberty Lending Services, Inc.


We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Management
Assertion Regarding Compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for
Mortgage Bankers Minimum Servicing Standards, that Liberty Lending Services,
Inc. ("Liberty Lending") complied with the minimum servicing standards set forth
in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION
PROGRAM FOR MORTGAGE BANKERS as of and for the eighteen months ended December
31, 2001. Liberty Lending's management is responsible for Liberty Lending's
compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on management's assertion about Liberty Lending's compliance
based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about Liberty
Lending's compliance with the minimum servicing standards specified above and
performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on Liberty
Lending's compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Liberty Lending Services, Inc.
complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards during the eighteen
months ended December 31, 2001 is fairly stated in all material respects.

/s/ PriceWaterHouseCoopers LLC

March 8, 2002
Ex-99.2 a)

               Management Assertion Regarding Compliance With the
                       Uniform Single Attestation Program
                for Mortgage Bankers Minimum Servicing Standards

As of and for the eighteen month period ended December 31, 2001, Liberty Lending
Services, Inc., (Liberty Lending) complied in all material respects with the
minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of
America's UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM FOR MORTGAGE BANKERS. As of and for
this same period, Liberty Lending had in effect a fidelity bond policy in the
amount of $6,000,000 and an errors and omissions policy in the amount of
$6,000,000.



                                            /s/ Edward S. Chatfield
                                            ------------------------------
                                            Edward S. Chatfield
                                            Vice President, Loan Servicing


                                            3/21/02
                                            ------------------------------
                                            Date
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4006 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4006

To direct the Secretary of Defense to list certain individuals who are 
 awarded the Purple Heart on the internet website of the Department of 
 Defense that lists individuals who have been awarded certain military 
                                awards.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 5, 2022

Mr. Toomey (for himself, Mr. Casey, Mr. Tester, Mrs. Capito, Ms. Rosen, 
    Mr. Daines, Mr. King, and Mr. Scott of Florida) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                             Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Secretary of Defense to list certain individuals who are 
 awarded the Purple Heart on the internet website of the Department of 
 Defense that lists individuals who have been awarded certain military 
                                awards.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Honoring Purple Heart Recipients Act 
of 2022''.

SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF PURPLE HEART AWARDS ON MILITARY VALOR WEBSITE.

    The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the publicly accessible 
internet website of the Department of Defense that lists individuals 
who have been awarded certain military awards includes a list of each 
individual who meets each of the following criteria:
            (1) The individual is awarded the Purple Heart for 
        qualifying actions that occur after the date of the enactment 
        of this Act.
            (2) The individual elects to be included on such list (or, 
        if the individual is deceased, the primary next of kin elects 
        the individual to be included on such list).
            (3) The public release of the individual's name does not 
        constitute a security risk, as determined by the Secretary of 
        the military department concerned.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 27, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-27-1998
<CASH>                                       3,182,468
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,921,683
<ALLOWANCES>                                   642,780
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,563,952
<PP&E>                                     187,360,706
<DEPRECIATION>                              20,335,047
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             295,001,359
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       34,672,463
<BONDS>                                    128,945,784
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  98,098,034
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               295,001,359
<SALES>                                     69,240,264
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            72,440,130
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               71,606,367
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          10,414,876
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             15,793,817
<INCOME-TAX>                                 6,581,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          9,212,817
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             (1,066,466)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 8,146,351
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.99
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.95
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 47 (Friday, March 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 13207]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5861]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
[Dept. Circ. 570, 1994 Rev., Supp. No. 12; 4-00236]


Reliance Surety Company; Surety Companies Acceptable on Federal 
Bonds

    A Certificate of Authority as an acceptable surety on Federal Bonds 
is hereby issued to the following company under Sections 9304 to 9308, 
Title 31, of the United States Code. Federal bond-approving officers 
should annotate their reference copies of the Treasury Circular 570, 
1994 Revision, on page 34174 to reflect this addition:
    Reliance Surety Company. Business Address: 4 Penn Center Plaza, 
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Phone: (215) 864-4000. Underwriting 
Limitation b/: $1,262,000. Surety Licenses c/: AL, AK, AZ, AR, CO, DE, 
DC, GA, HI, ID, IL, IN, IA, KS, KY, LA, MD, MA, MN, MS, MO, MT, NE, NV, 
NJ, NM, NC, ND, OH, OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, SD, TN, TX, UT, VA, WV, WI, WY. 
Incorporated in: Delaware.
    Certificates of Authority expire on June 30 each year, unless 
revoked prior to that date. The Certificates are subject to subsequent 
annual renewal as long as the companies remain qualified (31 CFR Part 
223). A list of qualified companies is published annually as of July 1 
in Treasury Department Circular 570, with details as to underwriting 
limitations, areas in which licensed to transact surety business and 
other information.
    Copies of the Circular may be obtained from the Surety Bond Branch, 
Funds Management Division, Financial Management Service, Department of 
the Treasury, Hyattsville, MD, telephone (202) 874-6905.

    Dated: March 3, 1995.
Charles F. Schwan III,
Director, Funds Management Division, Financial Management Service.
[FR Doc. 95-5861 Filed 3-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-M