alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,162,041
<SECURITIES>                                23,174,926
<RECEIVABLES>                                  135,819
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         673,040
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              30,056,483
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     18,924,984
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    10,535,559
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                30,056,483
<SALES>                                      8,360,945
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,449,109
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,463,612
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,102,667)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,102,667)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,102,667)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.29)


</TABLE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 26, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-2773

Peabody Energy Corporation:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          21,394
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  204,462
<ALLOWANCES>                                    22,783
<INVENTORY>                                     16,582
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               281,561
<PP&E>                                         476,051
<DEPRECIATION>                                 186,333
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 821,734
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          180,470
<BONDS>                                        262,702
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              203
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     329,112
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   821,734
<SALES>                                      1,114,491
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,114,491
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,024,935
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,461
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 77,095
<INCOME-TAX>                                    33,759
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             43,180
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    43,180
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.13
        

</TABLE>
PRIME RETAIL, L.P.

                 EXHIBIT 12.1: COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS
    TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK DISTRIBUTIONS AND DIVIDENDS

              (Amounts in thousands, except for ratio information)
                                                 
                                                 Three Months Ended March 31
                                            ------------------------------------
                                                   1998                   1997
                                            --------------        --------------
 Income before minority interest            $       8,037         $       3,731
 Interest incurred                                  9,693                 9,600
 Amortization of capitalized interest                  94                    79
 Amortization of debt issuance costs                  167                   608
 Amortization of interest rate protection
      contracts                                       342                   336
 Less interest earned on interest rate
      protection contracts                            (23)                  (39)
 Less capitalized interest                         (1,388)                 (845)
                                            --------------        --------------
      Earnings                                     16,922                13,470
                                            --------------        --------------

 Interest incurred                                  9,693                 9,600
 Amortization of debt issuance costs                  167                   608
 Amortization of interest rate protection
      contracts                                       342                   336
 Preferred stock distributions and dividends        4,166                 3,093
                                            --------------        --------------
      Combined Fixed Charges and
         Preferred Stock Distributions
         and Dividends                             14,368                13,637
                                            --------------        --------------

 Excess of Combined Fixed Charges
      and Preferred Stock Distributions
      and Dividends over Earnings                                 $        (167)
                                                                  ==============
 Ratio of Earnings to Combined
      Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock
      Distributions and Dividends                    1.18 x
                                            ==============
Order entered December 1 3 , 2013

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 13

- 01240

- CV

LUISA ALONSO, Appellant

V.

ALLIANCE AFT, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC

- 12

- 06040

- D



### O RDER

We GRANT appellee’s December 5, 2013 unopposed second motion for an extension of

time to file a brief. Appellee shall file its brief on or before January 3, 2014.

/s/ DAVID LEWIS

JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 50 (Wednesday, March 15, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 14000]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6327]



[[Page 14000]]

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Amendment Notice of 
Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the NHLBI SEP 
on Dietary Protein and Blood Pressure, April 20, 1995, which was 
published in the Federal Register on February 21 (60 FR 9692).
    This Special Emphasis Panel was to have convened at 9:00 a.m. on 
April 20, at the Rockledge Building, Conference Room 8115, 8th Floor, 
National Institutes of Health, but has been changed to 9:00 a.m. on 
April 20, 1995, at the Natcher Building, Building 45, Conference Room 
B, National Institutes of Health.
    The entire meeting will be open to the public to provide concept 
review of the proposed contract or grant solicitations.

    Dated: March 8, 1995.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 95-6327 Filed 3-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ex rel ROBERT RAY HUNSUCKER, LLOYD HICKS, and ELBERT HAYWOOD, Electors, Relators v. SAM G. SMITHERMAN.

(Filed 14 January, 1960.)

' Appeal by plaintiffs from *Phillips, J.,*at May Term, 1959, of MONTGOMERY.

Civil action in the nature of *quo warranto*to determine right of Elwood C. Long to the office of Sheriff of Montgomery County, leave having been granted pursuant to provisions of G.S. 1-516 by the Attorney General for North Carolina to plaintiffs to bring and prosecute civil action in Superior Court of Montgomery County in the name of the State of North Carolina captioned as first hereinabove set forth, to try and determine the right and title of the said Elwood C. Long to said office of Sheriff.

Plaintiffs appeal.

*Gerald R. Chandler for relators, appellants.*

*Charles H. Dorsett, David H. Armstrong for defendant, appellee.*

*686PeR Cueiam.

This is companion case to *Long v. Smitherman, ante,*682 on appeal to Supreme Court, Fall Term 1959. The decision there is controlling here.

Hence under authority of decision here in that case, the judgment from which this appeal is taken is

Affirmed.
Ex-99.4 Aggregate Statement of Principal and Interest Distribution to
        Certificatesholders.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                            DISTRIBUTION IN DOLLARS
                                            -----------------------
     PERIOD          CLASS             INTEREST                  PRINCIPAL                 ENDING BALANCE
     ------          -----             --------                  ---------                 --------------
<S>                    <C>        <C>                       <C>                        <C>
     200212            A          $    3,582,75.52          $    37,936,102.69         $      32,517,507.55
     200212           B-1         $     450,912.78          $       112,829.07         $       6,470,236.48
     200212           B-2         $     263,098.88          $        63,823.29         $       3,776,258.25
     200212           B-3         $     150,345.97          $        36,471.37         $       2,157,915.82
     200212           B-4         $     105,256.24          $        24,862.74         $       1,511,189.05
     200212           B-5         $      45,169.50          $         8,263.64         $         650,108.97
     200212           B-6         $      57,581.30          $        10,422.71         $         788,492.67
     200212            PO         $           0.00          $        10,900.24         $          42,461.17
     200212            R          $           0.00          $             0.00         $               0.00
     200212            X          $     515,217.63          $             0.00         $     222,864,136.00
                                  $   5,170,457.82          $    38,203,675.75
</TABLE>
16-4158 United States v. Clark 

## UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 

# SUMMARY ORDER

RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT = S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (W ITH THE NOTATION A SUMMARY ORDER @ ). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL. At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 1 held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of 2 New York, on the 19 th day of March, two thousand eighteen. 3 4 PRESENT: 5 ROSEMARY S. POOLER, 6 REENA RAGGI, 7 CHRISTOPHER F. DRONEY, 8 Circuit Judges. 9

_____________________________________ 10 11 United States of America, 12 13 Appellee , 14 v. 16-4158 15 16 Kerry Clark, AKA Bembe, AKA Big Lips, 17 18 Defendant-Appellant .* 19

_____________________________________ 20 21 FOR APPELLEE: Nathan Rehn, Daniel B. Tehrani, 22 Assistant United States Attorneys, of 23 Counsel for Geoffrey S. Berman, 24 United States Attorney for the 25 Southern District of New York, New 26 York, N.Y. 27 28 FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT: Kerry Clark, pro se, Ayer, MA 29

* The Clerk of Court is respectfully in structed to amend the caption as above.2 Appeal from orders of the United States Dist rict Court for the Sout hern District of New 1 York (Chin, J .). 2
UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND 3 DECREED that the appeal is DISMISSED

. 4 Kerry Clark, pro se and incarcerated, appeals from the district cour t’s orders denying his 5 motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and for reconsideration of that 6 decision. The Government argues that the appeal is untimely. We assume the parties’ familiarity 7 with the underlying facts, the procedural history of the cas e, and the issues on appeal. 8 We agree with the Government and dismiss Clark’s appeal as untimely. A notice of 9 appeal in a criminal case must be filed within 14 days of the entry of the judgment or order being 10 appealed. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A); see also United States v. Arrango , 291 F.3d 170, 171 (2d 11 Cir. 2002) (applying time to appeal in a criminal case to § 3582 proceedings). Although Rule 12 4(b) is not jurisdictional, when “the govern ment properly objects to the untimeliness of a 13 defendant’s criminal appeal, [it] is mandatory and inflexible.” United States v. Frias , 521 F.3d 14 229, 234 (2d Cir. 2008). Here, Clark’s November 2016 notice of appeal is untimely filed from 15 both the district court’ s underlying June 2016 denial of his § 3582(c)(2) motion and its July 2016 16 denial of reconsideration. Because the Govern ment objects, we must dismiss the appeal as 17 untimely. 18 Accordingly, we DISMISS the appeal as untimely filed. 19
FOR THE COURT: 20 Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Clerk of Court 21
3XEOLF9HUVLRQRI%&,

3803&+$0%(5&$67,1*35(6685(&217$,1,1*$$/80,180



3,$==$52%(57

35,&(3803&203$1<

2WKHU

12

3XEOLF9HUVLRQRI%&,


12

12



 .*

,03257,1*7+,63$57)520&+,1$&2676
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-1862

Dayco Products, LLC:

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_05.09.19.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs the 10-digit HTSUS subheading under which your request was filed. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation.

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
exh10-35.htm




Exhibit 10.35







LOAN AGREEMENT


(Addendum No. 1)







WHEREAS:








	
·  

	
This addendum serves to update the Loan Agreement (attached as Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 10-K/A-2 Coronus Solar Inc. filed with the SEC on December 10, 2010) between Jefferson Thachuk (the “Lender”) and Coronus Solar Inc. (the “Borrower”).













	
·  

	
This addendum is current as of June 20, 2011.













	
·  

	
A detailed chronology of the Loans, subsequent to October 19, 2010 is attached to this addendum as Exhibit A.













	
·  

	
As at March 31, 2011, the principal amount of the Loans totaled CAD $246,000 and USD $6,600.













	
·  

	
As at June 20, 2011, the principal amount of the Loans totaled CAD $204,500, plus USD $6,600.












RESOLVED:







This addendum fairly and accurately characterizes the subsequent loan activity between the Lender and the Borrower.












DATED:  this 20th day of June, 2011.


















	
JEFFERSON THACHUK

	  	
RAVEN KOPELMAN


	
Jefferson Thachuk

	  	
Raven Kopelman


	
Lender

	  	
Coronus Solar Inc., Director


	  	  	  
	  	  	  
	
DAVID HOLMES

	  	
KENNETH BOGAS


	
David Holmes,

	  	
Kenneth Bogas


	
Coronus Solar Inc., Director

	  	
Coronus Solar Inc., Director































  





1











  














	
EXHIBIT A


	  	  	  	  	  
	
Loans from Shareholder - Jeff Thachuk

	  	  	  
	
As at June 20, 2011

	  	  	  	  
	  	  	
CAD

	  	
USD


	
Date

	
Source

	
Principal

	  	
Principal


	  	  	  	  	  
	
19-Oct-10

	
Opening Balance

	
246,000

	  	
6,600


	
18-Apr-11

	
Deposit

	
8,500

	  	
-


	
10-May-11

	
Payment

	
(50,000)

	  	
-


	  	  	  	  	  
	
 Total

	  	
 CAD         204,500

	  	
 USD             6,600

















































































  





2
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>  1004540
<NAME> AIRPLANES US TRUST
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            MAR-31-99
<PERIOD-END>                                 JUN-30-99
<CASH>                                               6
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        4
<ALLOWANCES>                                        (1)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     9
<PP&E>                                             422
<DEPRECIATION>                                     138
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     326
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                5
<BONDS>                                            338
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        (169)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       326
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    11
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        5
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     1
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     1
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  10
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (6)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (6)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (6)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>