14238 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 51 / Thursday, March 16, 1995 / Proposed Rules

approximately 3 work hours per

airplane to accomplish the proposed

actions, and that the average labor rate

is $60 per work hour. Required parts

would be supplied by the manufacturer

at no cost to the operators. Based on

these figures, the total cost impact of the

proposed AD on U.S. operators is

estimated to be $2,700, or $180 per

airplane.

The total cost impact figure discussed

above is based on assumptions that no

operator has yet accomplished any of

the proposed requirements of this AD

action, and that no operator would

accomplish those actions in the future if

this AD were not adopted.

The regulations proposed herein

would not have substantial direct effects

on the States, on the relationship

between the national government and

the States, or on the distribution of

power and responsibilities among the

various levels of government. Therefore,

in accordance with Executive Order

12612, it is determined that this

proposal would not have sufficient

federalism implications to warrant the

preparation of a Federalism Assessment.

For the reasons discussed above, I

certify that this proposed regulation (1)

is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’

under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not

a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the DOT

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44

FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) if

promulgated, will not have a significant

economic impact, positive or negative,

on a substantial number of small entities

under the criteria of the Regulatory

Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft

regulatory evaluation prepared for this

action is contained in the Rules Docket.

A copy of it may be obtained by

contacting the Rules Docket at the

location provided under the caption

ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation

safety, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

Accordingly, pursuant to the

authority delegated to me by the

Administrator, the Federal Aviation

Administration proposes to amend part

39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations

(14 CFR part 39) as follows:

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS

DIRECTIVES

1. The authority citation for part 39

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. App. 1354(a), 1421

and 1423; 49 U.S.C. 106(g); and 14 CFR

11.89.

§ 39.13 [Amended]

2. Section 39.13 is amended by

adding the following new airworthiness

directive:

Jetstream Aircraft Limited: Docket 95–NM–

17–AD.

Applicability: Model 4101 airplanes,

constructors numbers 41004 through 41046

inclusive, certificated in any category.

Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane

identified in the preceding applicability

provision, regardless of whether it has been

modified, altered, or repaired in the area

subject to the requirements of this AD. For

airplanes that have been modified, altered, or

repaired so that the performance of the

requirements of this AD is affected, the

owner/operator must use the authority

provided in paragraph (c) to request approval

from the FAA. This approval may address

either no action, if the current configuration

eliminates the unsafe condition; or different

actions necessary to address the unsafe

condition described in this AD. Such a

request should include an assessment of the

effect of the changed configuration on the

unsafe condition addressed by this AD. In no

case does the presence of any modification,

alteration, or repair remove any airplane from

the applicability of this AD.

Compliance: Required as indicated, unless

accomplished previously.

To prevent failure of the existing pressure

switch in the fuel system of the left and right

engine, which, during an engine fire, could

result in fuel leakage that could add fuel to

the fire, accomplish the following:

(a) Within 60 days after the effective date

of this AD, replace pressure switch having

part number (P/N) 1153P0073 with a new

pressure switch having P/N 1153P0094 in the

fuel system of the left and right engine, in

accordance with Jetstream Service Bulletin

J41–73–007, dated November 22, 1994.

(b) As of the effective date of this AD, no

person shall install a pressure switch, P/N

1153P0073, on any airplane.

(c) An alternative method of compliance or

adjustment of the compliance time that

provides an acceptable level of safety may be

used if approved by the Manager,

Standardization Branch, ANM–113, FAA,

Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators

shall submit their requests through an

appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance

Inspector, who may add comments and then

send it to the Manager, Standardization

Branch, ANM–113.

Note 2: Information concerning the

existence of approved alternative methods of

compliance with this AD, if any, may be

obtained from the Standardization Branch,

ANM–113.

(d) Special flight permits may be issued in

accordance with sections 21.197 and 21.199

of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR

21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to

a location where the requirements of this AD

can be accomplished.

Issued in Renton, Washington, on March

10, 1995.

Neil D. Schalekamp,

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.

[FR Doc. 95–6469 Filed 3–15–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–U

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 95–ASO–5]

Proposed Establishment of Class D

and E Airspace, Amendment to Class

D and E Airspace and Removal of

Class E Airspace; Marietta, GA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

SUMMARY: This notice proposes to

establish Class D airspace for Cobb

County-McCollum Field, amend the

Class D and E airspace for Dobbins ARB

(NAS Atlanta), and remove the Class E

surface area extension for Dobbins ARB

(NAS Atlanta) at Marietta, GA. This

proposed action would also establish

Class E airspace for Cobb CountyMcCollum Field when the control tower

is closed. Cobb County-McCollum Field

currently is included in the Dobbins

ARB (NAS Atlanta) Class D airspace

area. A non-federal tower has been

commissioned at Cobb CountyMcCollum Field which has a LOC RWY

27 Standard Instrument Procedure

(SIAP) and a VOR/DME or GPS RWY 9

SIAP. Class D and E airspace to the

surface is required to accommodate

these SIAPs and contain instrument

flight rule (IFR) operations at Cobb

County-McCollum Field. As a result of

this proposed action the Dobbins ARB

(NAS Atlanta) Class D and E airspace to

the surface would be reduced and the

Class E surface area extension would be

removed concurrent with the

establishment of the Class D and E

airspace area for Cobb CountyMcCollum Field. This amendment

would also make a technical correction

to the name and location of Atlanta

Dobbins AFB, GA. The correct name

and location is Dobbins ARB (NAS

Atlanta), Marietta, GA.

DATES: Comments must be received on

or before April 28, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on the

proposal in triplicate to: Federal

Aviation Administration, Docket No.

95–ASO–5 Manager, System

Management Branch, ASO–530, P.O.

Box 20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320.

The official docket may be examined

in the Office of the Assistant Chief

Counsel for Southern Region, Room 550,
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 51 / Thursday, March 16, 1995 / Proposed Rules 14239

1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park,

Georgia 30337, telephone (404) 305–

5586.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Michael J. Powderly, System

Management Branch, Air Traffic

Division, Federal Aviation

Administration, P.O. Box 20636,

Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404)

305–5570.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

Interested parties are invited to

participate in this proposed rulemaking

by submitting such written data, views

or arguments as they may desire.

Comments that provide the factual basis

supporting the views and suggestions

presented are particularly helpful in

developing reasoned regulatory

decisions on the proposal. Comments

are specifically invited on the overall

regulatory, aeronautical, economic

environmental, and energy-related

aspects of the proposal.

Communications should identify the

airspace docket and be submitted in

triplicate to the address listed above.

Commenters wishing the FAA to

acknowledge receipt of their comments

on this notice must submit with those

comments a self-addressed, stamped

postcard on which the following

statement is made: ‘‘Comments to

Airspace Docket No. 95–ASO–5.’’ The

postcard will be date/time stamped and

returned to the commenter. All

communications received before the

specified closing date for comments will

be considered before taking action on

the proposed rule. The proposal

contained in this notice may be changed

in the light of comments received. All

comments submitted will be available

for examination in the Office of the

Assistant Chief Counsel for Southern

Region, Room 550, 1701 Columbia

Avenue, College Park, Georgia 30337,

both before and after the closing date for

comments. A report summarizing each

substantive public contact with FAA

personnel concerned with this

rulemaking will be filed in the docket.

Availability of NPRMs

Any person may obtain a copy of this

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM)

by submitting a request to the Federal

Aviation Administration, Manager,

System Management Branch, ASO–530,

Air Traffic Division, P.O. Box 20636,

Atlanta, Georgia 30320.

Communications must identify the

notice number of this NPRM. Persons

interested in being placed on a mailing

list for future NPRM’s should also

request a copy of Advisory Circular No.

11–2A which describes the application

procedure.

The Proposal

The FAA is considering an

amendment to part 71 of the Federal

Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 71) to

establish Class D airspace for Cobb

County-McCollum Field, amend the

Class D and E airspace for Dobbins AFB

(NAS Atlanta), and remove the Class E

surface area extension for Dobbins ARB

(NAS Atlanta) at Marietta, GA. This

proposed action would also establish

Class E airspace for Cobb CountyMcCollum Field when the control tower

is closed. Cobb County-McCollum Field

currently is included in the Dobbins

ARB (NAS Atlanta) Class D airspace

area. A non-federal tower has been

commissioned at Cobb CountyMcCollum Field. Class D and E airspace

to the surface is required to

accommodate current SIAPs and

contain IFR operations at Cobb CountyMcCollum Field. As a result of this

proposed action the Dobbins ARB (NAS

Atlanta) Class D and E airspace to the

surface would be reduced and the Class

E surface areas extension would be

removed concurrent with the

establishment of the Class D airspace

area for Cobb County-McCollum Field.

This amendment would also make a

technical correction to the name and

location of Atlanta Dobbins AFB, GA.

The correct name and location is

Dobbins ARB (NAS Atlanta), Marietta,

GA. Class D airspace designations, Class

E airspace areas designated as a surface

area for an airport, and Class E airspace

area designated as an extension to a

Class D surface areas are published in

Paragraphs 5000, 6002, and 6004

respectively of FAA Order 7400.9B

dated July 18, 1994 and effective

September 16, 1994 which is

incorporated by reference in CFR 71.1.

The Class D and E airspace designations

listed in this document would be

published subsequently in the Order.

The FAA has determined that this

proposed regulation only involves an

established body of technical

regulations for which frequent and

routine amendments are necessary to

keep them operationally current. It,

therefore, (1) is not a ‘‘significant

regulatory action’’ under Executive

Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant

rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies

and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February

26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant

preparation of a regulatory evaluation as

the anticipated impact is so minimal.

Since this is a routine matter that will

only affect air traffic procedures and air

navigation, it is certified that this rule,

when promulgated, will not have a

significant economic impact on a

substantial number of small entities

under the criteria of the Regulatory

Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

Airspace, Incorporation by reference,

Navigation (Air).

The Proposed Amendment

In consideration of the foregoing, the

Federal Aviation Administration

proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as

follows:

PART 71—[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for 14 CFR

part 71 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. app. 1348(a), 1354(a),

1510; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–

1963 Comp., p. 389; 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 14 CFR

11.69.

§ 71.1 [Amended]

2. The incorporation by reference in

14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation

Administration Order 7400.9B, Airspace

Designations and Reporting Points,

dated July 18, 1994 and effective

September 16, 1994, is amended as

follows:

Paragraph 5000 Class D Airspace.

* * * * *

ASO GA D Marietta, GA [New]

Cobb County-McCollum Field, GA

(Lat. 34°00′47′′ N, long. 84°35′55′′ W)

Dobbins ARB (NAS Atlanta)

(Lat. 33°54′55′′ N, long. 84°30′59′′ W)

That airspace extending upward from the

surface to and including 3500 feet MSL

within a 4-mile radius of Cobb CountyMcCollum Field, excluding that airspace

southeast of a line connecting the 2 points of

intersection with a 5.5-mile radius centered

on Dobbins ARB (NAS Atlanta). This Class D

airspace area is effective during the specific

days and times established in advance by a

Notice to Airmen. The effective days and

times will thereafter be continuously

published in the Airport/Facility Directory.

* * * * *

ASO GA D Marietta, GA [Revised]

Dobbins ARB (NAS Atlanta), GA

(Lat. 33°54′55′′ N, long. 84°30′59′′ W)

Cobb County-McCollum Field

(Lat. 34°00′47′′ N, long. 84°35′55′′ W)

Fulton County Airport-Brown Field

(Lat. 33°46′45′′ N, long. 84°31′17′′ W)

That airspace extending upward from the

surface to and including 3600 feet MSL

within a 5.5-mile radius of Dobbins ARB

(NAS Atlanta), excluding airspace northwest

of a line connecting the 2 points of

intersection with a 4-mile radius centered on

Cobb County-McCollum Field, and also

excluding that airspace south of a line

connecting the 2 points of intersection with

a 4-mile radius centered on Fulton County

Airport-Brown Field. This Class D airspace
14240 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 51 / Thursday, March 16, 1995 / Proposed Rules

area is effective during the specific days and

times established in advance by a Notice to

Airmen. The effective days and times will

thereafter be continuously published in the

Airport/Facility Directory.

* * * * *

Paragraph 6002 Class E Airspace Areas

Designated as a Surface Area for an Airport.

* * * * *

ASO GA E2 Marietta, GA [New]

Cobb County-McCollum Field, GA

(Lat. 34°00′47′′ N, long. 84°35′55′′ W)

Dobbins ARB (NAS Atlanta)

(Lat. 35°54′55′′ N, long. 84°30′59′′ W)

Within a 4-mile radius of Cobb CountyMcCollum Field, excluding that airspace

southeast of a line connecting the 2 points of

intersection with a 5.5-mile radius centered

on Dobbins ARB (NAS Atlanta). This Class E

airspace area is effective during the specific

days and times established in advance by a

Notice to Airmen. The effective days and

times will thereafter be continuously

published in the Airport/Facility Directory.

* * * * *

ASO GA E2 Marietta, GA [Revised]

Dobbins ARB (NAS Atlanta), GA

(Lat. 33°54′55′′ N, long. 84°30′59′′ W)

Cobb County-McCollum Field

(Lat. 34°00′47′′ N, long. 84°35′55′′ W)

Fulton County Airport-Brown Field

(Lat. 33°46′45′′ N, long. 84°31′17′′ W)

Within a 5.5-mile radius of Dobbins ARB

(NAS Atlanta), excluding that airspace

northwest of a line connecting the 2 points

of intersection with a 4-mile radius centered

on Cobb County-McCollum Field, and also

excluding that airspace south of a line

connecting the 2 points of intersection with

a 4-mile radius centered on Fulton County

Airport-Brown Field. This Class E airspace

area is effective during the specific days and

times established in advance by a Notice to

Airmen. The effective days and times will

thereafter be continuously published in the

Airport/Facility Director.

* * * * *

Paragraph 6004 Class E Airspace Areas

Designated as an Extension to a Class D

Surface Area.

* * * * *

ASO GA E4 Atlanta Dobbins AFB, GA

[Removed]

* * * * *

Issued in College Park, Georgia, on March

6, 1995.

Michael J. Powderly,

Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division,

Southern Region.

[FR Doc. 95–6514 Filed 3–15–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 95–ANM–8]

Proposed Amendment to Class D

Airspace; Ogden, Utah

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

SUMMARY: This proposed rule would

amend the Ogden, Utah, Class D

airspace, based on the results of an

airspace review. This proposal would

amend the ceiling altitude and the

geographic size of the Ogden, Utah,

Class D airspace area. The amendment

would bring publications up-to-date

giving continuous information to the

aviation public.

DATES: Comments must be received on

or before April 15, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on the

proposal in triplicate to: Manager,

System Management Branch, ANM–530,

Federal Aviation Administration,

Docket No. 95–ANM–8, 1601 Lind

Avenue S.W., Renton, Washington

98055–4056.

The official docket may be examined

at the same address.

An informal docket may also be

examined during normal business hours

at the address listed above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

James Riley, System Management

Branch, ANM–530, Federal Aviation

Administration, Docket No. 95–ANM–8,

1601 Lind Avenue S.W., Renton,

Washington 98055–4056; telephone

number: (206) 227–2537.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

Interested parties are invited to

participate in this proposed rulemaking

by submitting such written data, views,

or arguments as they may desire.

Comments that provide the factual basis

supporting the views and suggestions

presented are particularly helpful in

developing reasoned regulatory

decisions on the proposal. Comments

are specifically invited on the overall

regulatory, aeronautical, economic,

environmental, and energy-related

aspects of the proposal.

Communications should identify the

airspace docket number and be

submitted in triplicate to the address

listed above. Commenters wishing the

FAA to acknowledge receipt of their

comments on this notice must submit

with those comments a self-addressed,

stamped postcard on which the

following statement is made:

‘‘Comments to Airspace Docket No. 95–

ANM–8.’’ The postcard will be date/

time stamped and returned to the

commenter. All communications

received on or before the specified

closing date for comments will be

considered before taking action on the

proposed rule. The proposal contained

in this notice may be changed in light

of comments received. All comments

submitted will be available for

examination at the address listed above

both before and after the closing date for

comments. A report summarizing each

substantive public contact with FAA

personnel concerned with this

rulemaking will be filed in the docket.

Availability of NPRM’s

Any person may obtain a copy of this

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM)

by submitting a request to the Federal

Aviation Administration, System

Management Branch, ANM–530, 1601

Lind Avenue S.W., Renton, Washington

98055–4056. Communications must

identify the notice number of this

NPRM. Persons interested in being

placed on a mailing list for future

NPRM’s should also request a copy of

Advisory Circular No. 11–2A, which

describes the application procedure.

The Proposal

The FAA is considering an

amendment to part 71 of the Federal

Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 71) to

amend Class D airspace at Ogden, Utah.

This proposal would amend the ceiling

altitude and the geographic size of the

Ogden, Utah, Class D airspace area. The

coordinates for this airspace docket are

based on North American Datum 83.

Class D airspace is published in

Paragraph 5000 of FAA Order 7400.9B

dated July 18, 1994, and effective

September 16, 1994, which is

incorporated by reference in 14 CFR

71.1. The Class D airspace designation

listed in this document would be

published subsequently in the Order.

The FAA has determined that this

proposed regulation only involves an

established body of technical

regulations for which frequent and

routine amendments are necessary to

keep them operationally current. It,

therefore, (1) is not a ‘‘significant

regulatory action’’ under Executive

Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant

rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies

and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February

26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant

preparation of a regulatory evaluation as

the anticipated impact is so minimal.

Since this is a routine matter that will

only affect air traffic procedures and air

navigation, it is certified that this rule,

when promulgated, will not have a

significant economic impact on a

substantial number of small entities