alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 6, 2013

s1030 

# Order

Clerk 

### November 6, 2013

147718

In re TIMOTHY T. FRYHOFF

_________________________________________

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION,

Petitioner. SC: 147718

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the petition for injunction pursuant to MCR 9.108(E)(4) is

considered, and it is DENIED. In lieu of granting the relief requested, we invite the

Attorney Grievance Commission to file with the Court its proposal for amending the

Michigan Rules of Professional Conduct so as to clarify the status of attorney fee

provisions such as that utilized b y the attorney who is the subject of the petition for

injunction. The issues are whether the use of a “results obtained” or “value added”

provision in the calculation of attorney fees in a divorce case makes the fee “contingent”

and thus impermissible und er MRPC 1.5(d), and if so, whether the rules should be

amended to permit such fee provisions under certain conditions.

The State Bar Family Law Council and Standing Committee on Professional

Ethics are also invited to file proposed rule amendments addre ssing the issue presented.
**Exhibit 31.1**

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

I, Richard E. Lundin, certifythat: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Da-Lite Screen Company, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) forthe registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared; 

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles; 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: February 26, 2010
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

October 18, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-1767

Koller Products, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 7 (Wednesday, January 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 2767]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-632]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Current Status of the Vessel Sanitation Program and Experience to 
Date with Program Operations; Public Meeting

    The National Center for Environmental Health (NCEH) of the Centers 
for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announces the following 
meeting.

    Name: Current Status of the Vessel Sanitation Program (VSP) and 
Experience to Date with Program Operations--Public meeting between 
CDC and the cruise ship industry, private sanitation consultants, 
and other interested parties.
    Time and Date: 9 a.m.-4 p.m., Wednesday, January 25, 1995.
    Place: Doral Inn, 541 Lexington Avenue at East 49th Street, New 
York, New York 10022, telephone 212/755-1200.
    Status: Open to the public for participation, comment, and 
observation, limited only by space available.
    Purpose: To discuss current status of the VSP and experience to 
date with program operations.
    Matters to be discussed: During the past 8 years, as part of the 
revised VSP, CDC has conducted a series of public meetings with 
members of the cruise ship industry, private sanitation consultants, 
and other interested parties. This meeting is a continuation of that 
series of public meetings. Some of the topics to be discussed at 
this meeting include CDC's interim recommendations to minimize 
transmission of Legionnaires' disease from whirlpool spas aboard 
cruise ships, the VSP budget and fees, shipbuilding construction 
guidelines for cruise vessels destined to call on U.S. ports, the 
CDC consumer advisory for consumption of raw or undercooked food, 
and vessel construction inspections.
    For a period of 15 days following the meeting, through February 
9, 1995, the official record of the meeting will remain open so that 
additional material or comments may be submitted to be made part of 
the record of the meeting.
    Contact person for more information: Thomas E. O'Toole, Deputy 
Chief, Special Programs Group (F29), NCEH, CDC, 4770 Buford Highway, 
NE, Atlanta, Georgia 30341-3724, telephone 4040/488-7073.

    Dated: January 4, 1995.
William H. Gimson,
Acting Associate Director for Policy Coordination, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention (CDC).
[FR Doc. 95-632 Filed 1-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 7, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 12548]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5470]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Project Nos. 1417 and 1835]


Central Nebraska Public Power and Irrigation District, Nebraska 
Public Power District; Public Briefing

March 1, 1995.
    In response to a request by the U.S. Department of the Interior 
(Interior), the Commission will host a public briefing on the 
Memorandum of Agreement for the Central Platte River Basin Endangered 
Species Recovery Implementation Program (MOA). The briefing is 
scheduled for April 6, 1995, from 10:00 a.m. until 12:00 noon in the 
Commission Meeting Room, located on the 9th Floor of 825 N. Capitol 
St., N.E., Washington, D.C.
    Representatives from each of the parties to the MOA, including 
Interior and the States of Nebraska, Colorado, and Wyoming, will make a 
presentation on the Platte River Basin and activities under the MOA.
    This briefing is neither a hearing nor a settlement conference. It 
will provide an opportunity for the Commission staff and interested 
persons to obtain a fuller understanding of the MOA and activities 
under it.
    The briefing will be recorded by a stenographer, and all briefing 
statements (oral and written) will become part of the Commission's 
public record of this proceeding. Anyone wishing to receive a copy of 
the transcript of the briefing may contact Ann Riley & Associates by 
calling (202) 293-3950, or writing to 1612 K Street, NW, Suite 300, 
Washington, D.C. 20006.
    Anyone wishing to comment in writing on the briefing must do so no 
later than May 8, 1995. Comments should be addressed to: Lois D. 
Cashell, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North 
Capitol Street, NE., Washington, D.C. 20426.
    Reference should be clearly made to: the Kingsley Dam (Project No. 
1417) and North Platte/Keystone Diversion Dam (Project No. 1835).
    For further information, please contact Frankie Green at (202) 501-
7704.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-5470 Filed 3-6-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 10.9


 





 






    	 



    	 



    

 


 






    	 



    	 



    

 


 






    	 



    	 



    

 


 






    	 



    	 



    

 


 IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, Maker, intending to be legally bound hereby has caused this Note to be duly executed by the undersigned as of the day
and year first above written. 


   


   


	   	 ALPHATIME
    ACQUISITON CORP 
	   	   	   
	   	 By:
     	 /s/
    Dajiang Guo 
	   	 Name:
     	 Dajiang
    Guo 
	   	 Title:
     	 CEO
#### SAMUEL ARROW v. H. C. CHANDGIE.

(Filed 15 April, 1931.)

Appeal by plaintiff from *Finley, J.,*at January 5th Term, 1931, of Guilford.

Civil action brought before a justice of the peace to recover for personal services alleged to have been rendered by the plaintiff to the defendant, which resulted in a judgment for the plaintiff and appeal by the defendant to the Superior Court.

On a plea to the jurisdiction and denial of liability because plaintiff’s claim allegedly arose out of unadjusted partnership dealings between the parties, the jury in the Superior Court found with the defendant.

From a judgment dismissing the action for want of jurisdiction, plaintiff appeals, assigning errors.

*7ounce & 7ounce for plaintiff.*

*Frazier & Frazier for defendant.*

Per Curiam.

Affirmed on authority of *Nixon v. Morse,*194 N. C., 225, 139 S. E., 170, *Love v. Rhyne,*86 N. C., 576, and *Commissioners v. Sparks,*179 N. C., 581, 103 S. E., 142.

Affirmed.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Southern Insect Management Research: Stoneville, MS
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Stoneville, Mississippi Southern Insect Management Research Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications

Research Projects Subjects of Investigation at this LocationEach ARS research project has related subjects of investigation.  Listed below are the subjects of investigation currently conducted at this location.
Clicking on a subject of investigation will list the research projects within that  subject of investigation.Subjects of Investigation
                            Corn (for sweetcorn use 1480)
                                Grain sorghum
                                Honey bees
                                Soybean
                                Sweet potato
                                Upland cotton


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### STATE v. JAMES LAW and MATTHEW KELLY.

(Filed 19 December, 1947.)

Intoxicating Liquor § 8: Indictment § 30: Larceny § 4—

An indictment for larceny of an automobile wbicb bad been seized by officers of the law wbicb lays tbe ownership of the automobile individually in one of tbe officers who had seized it, will not be held fatally defective, since such officer was entitled to hold tbe automobile and approve bond for its return, and thus bad a special interest therein sufficient to obviate a fatal variance.

Appeal by defendants from *Clement, J.,*at June Term, 1947, of Forsyth.

Criminal prosecution on indictment charging tbe defendant, in one count, with tbe larceny of an automobile, of tbe value of $700.00, tbe property of one Oscar Morrison; and in a second count, with receiving the same automobile, knowing it to have been feloniously stolen or taken in violation of G. S., 14-71.

Tbe evidence for tbe prosecution tends to show that on tbe night of 15 April, 1946, Oscar Morrison and Holt Neal, police officers of tbe Oity of Winston-Salem, took possession of an automobile on Mickey Mill Eoad in tbe Eastern section of tbe Oity, wbicb they thought bad been used in tbe transportation of non-tax-paid whiskey contrary to law, and drove it to tbe city lot where it was parked for tbe night.

During tbe night, tbe automobile was stolen from tbe city lot, and there is evidence, circumstantial and presumptive, tending to connect tbe defendants with its disappearance.

Tbe defendants rested on their demurrers to tbe State’s case and offered no evidence.

Verdict: Guilty as to both defendants.

Judgment: Two years on tbe roads as to each defendant.

Tbe defendants appeal, assigning errors.

*Attorney-General McMullan and. Assistant Attorneys-General Bruton, Rhodes, and Moody for the State.*

*William H. Boyer and Philip B. Lucas for defendant.*

*444Stacy, C. J.

Tbe case was here at tbe Fall Term, 1946, on an indictment which laid tbe ownership of tbe property in tbe City of Winston-Salem. Tbe officer who seized tbe property was alone entitled to bold it, or approve bond for its return, and it was suggested tbe right to tbe property should be laid in tbe seizing officer or in tbe custody of tbe law. 227 N. C., 103.

In tbe present bill, tbe ownership of tbe property is laid in Oscar Morrison. On tbe bearing, it appeared that Oscar Morrison was one of tbe seizing officers who took possession of tbe automobile. Tbe defendants have again pressed the issue of fatal variance with vigor and confidence.

Oscar Morrison, as one of tbe, seizing officers, was entitled to bold tbe automobile and to approve bond for its return, thus be bad a special interest therein. This suffices, we think, to overcome tbe demurrers to tbe evidence and to obviate a fatal variance. *S. v. Allen,*103 N. C., 433, 9 S. E., 626; *S. v. Bell,*65 N. C., 313; *S. v. Grant,*104 N. C., 908, 10 S. E., 554.

Tbe exceptions to tbe charge are too attenuate to invalidate tbe trial.

Tbe verdict and judgments will be upheld.

No error.
#### MRS. T. L. CLAYTON, Administratrix of F. L. Clayton, Deceased v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE HIGHWAY & PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION.

(Filed 20 November, 1957)

Appeal by defendant from *Hall,*/., February, 1957 Civil Term, Franklin Superior Court.

Proceeding under Tort Claims Act for damages alleged to have been caused by the negligence of an employee of the defendant.

*George B. Patton, Attorney General; R. Brookes Peters, Asst. Attorney General and Parks H. Icenhour, Staff Attorney, for the State.*

*Gaither M. Beam, for plaintiff, appellee.*

Per Curiam.

The facts in this case are fully stated in the case of *D. H. Tucker v. State Highway & Public Works Commission, ante,*171, decided this day. Under the authority of that case, the order of Judge Hall is

Modified and Affirmed.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2427

Aerus LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_05.09.19.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
Consent(Director)


EXHIBIT 10.02 

ORGANA GARDENS INTERNATIONAL INC.

(the “Company”)

CONSENT TO ACT AS DIRECTOR

I hereby consent to act as a director of the Company and acknowledge that I am not disqualified to become or to act as a director under Chapter 78 of the Nevada Revised Statutes.

I hereby confirm that:

1.

I am not under the age of 18 years;

2.

I have not been found by a court, in the United States of America or elsewhere, to be incapable of managing my own affairs;

3.

I am not an undischarged bankrupt; and

4.

I have not been convicted in or out of Nevada of an offence in connection with the promotion, formation or management of a corporation or unincorporated business, or of an offence involving fraud.




In addition, the undersigned hereby consents to the holding of any meeting of the directors or of a committee of the directors of the Company by means of such telephonic, electronic or other communication facility, as permit all persons participating in the subject meetings to communicate adequately with each other.




This consent shall continue in effect from year to year so long as the undersigned is re-elected to the board of directors, provided that in the event that the undersigned revokes this consent or resigns from the board of directors, this consent shall cease to have effect from the date of receipt in writing by the Company of such revocation or resignation, as the case may be, or, if the latter, the effective date of such resignation.

DIRECTORS HAVE SUBSTANTIAL DUTIES AND OBLIGATIONS AND MAY BE SUBJECT TO SIGNIFICANT LIABILITIES. THE PERSON SIGNING THIS CONSENT SHOULD OBTAIN INDEPENDENT LEGAL ADVICE.

		
	Dated:

	June 24, 2011


	Print name:

	Sharon Deutsch 


	Address:

	 

35 South Ocean Avenue

Patchogue, New York

11772


	Signature

	/s/: Sharon Deutsch
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-1738

Katadyn North America, Inc: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions_03.20.1

9.pdf.

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel