alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Ex-99.1 a)

KPMG

         700 Louisiana                                    Telephone 713 319 2000
         Houston, TX 77002                                Fax:  713 319 2041





                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

The Board of Directors
 Mellon Mortgage Company:


We have examined management's assertion about Mellon Mortgage Company's (the
Company) compliance with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the
Mortgage Bankers Association of America's (MBA) UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION
PROGRAM FOR MORTGAGE BANKERS, as of and for the year ended December 31, 1998,
included in the accompanying Management Assertion (Residential Mortgage Loan
Servicing). Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those
minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
management's assertion about the Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a
legal determination on the Company's compliance with the minimum servicing
standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Mellon Mortgage Company has complied
in all material respects with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards,
except minimum servicing standard I.1. related to ensuring that all custodial
and clearing accounts are reconciled on a monthly basis and reconciling items
are cleared in a timely manner in the Denver Servicing Center, as of and for the
year ended December 31, 1998, is fairly stated, in all material respects.

KPMG LLP

/s/ KPMG LLP

January 22, 1999




                                     - 8 -
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-1763

GreenTech Environmental, LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions

_05.09.19.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


CHIEF
      FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Davi Skin,
      Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, to my knowledge, that:





|(1) | the
              Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Davi Skin, Inc. for the quarter
              ended
              March 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or
              15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|(2) | the
              information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
              quarter ended March 31, 2007, fairly presents in all material respects,
              the financial condition and results of operations of Davi Skin,
              Inc..
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




By:
            /s/  
Joseph
                SpellmanName:
            Joseph
                SpellmanTitle:
            Principal
                Executive Officer and DirectorDate:
            May
                17, 2007By:
            /s/ 
                Munjit JohalName:
            Munjit
                JohalTitle:
            Principal
                Financial OfficerDate:
            May
                17, 2007
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2531

Reelcraft Industries:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
Exhibit 32.1



Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United Sates Code)





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Adams Golf, Inc, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify that:
The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 (the "Periodic Report") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)) and information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  | ADAMS GOLF, INC.                     
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|                   |  |                                      
|Date:  May 3, 2004 |  | By:/S/ OLIVER G. BREWER III          
|                   |  | Oliver G. Brewer, III                
|                   |  | Chief Executive Officer and President
|                   |  |                                      
|Date:  May 3, 2004 |  | By:/S/ ERIC LOGAN                    
|                   |  | Eric Logan                           
|                   |  | Chief Financial Officer              
|                   |  | (Principal Financial Officer)        





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Act and is not being filed as part of the Periodic Report or as a separate disclosure document
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Adams Golf, Inc. and will be retained by Adams Golf, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### E. G. GENTRY, Admr. Estate of FRANK GENTRY, v. TOWN OF HOT SPRINGS, NORTH CAROLINA.

(Filed 24 September, 1947.)

Appeal by plaintiff from *Nettles, J.,*at March Term, 1947, of MADISON.

Civil action to recover damages for death of plaintiff’s intestate, alleged to have been caused by the wrongful act, neglect or default of the defendant.

The complaint alleges substantially the same facts as those appearing in the companion case, *Gentry, Administrator, v. Town of Hot Springs, N. C., ante,*665.

Demurrer interposed on the ground that the complaint fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause for wrongful death against the defendant municipality.

From judgment sustaining the demurrer, the plaintiff appeals, assigning error.

*Calvin B. Edney for plaintiff, appellant.*

*George M. Pritchard and George L; Greene for defendant, appellee.*

*669Per Curiam.

Tbe decision of this case is controlled by tbe decision in tbe companion case, *Gentry, Administrator, v. Town of Hot Springs, N. C., ante,*665.

Affirmed.

Seawell, J., dissents.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2332

Reelcraft Industries:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
exhibit10a.htm
















Exhibit 10(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-171097) pertaining to Lincoln Life & Annuity Variable Annuity Account H, which is incorporated by reference into Post-Effective Amendment No. 1, and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) April 1, 2011, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York and (b) April 6, 2011, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Variable Annuity Account H.







                                              /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


June 20, 2011
TRIAL COURT OFFICIAL’S

REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RECORD

Court of Appeals No. (If known) : 12- 

Trial Court Style: STATE OF TEXAS VS. JUSTIN MEREDITH

Trial Court & County: 87TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

 Trial Court No.: 87CR16-32863

Date Trial Clerk’s Record Originally Due: 10.16.2017

Date Court Reporter’s/Recorder’s Record Originally Due: 

Anticipated Number of Pages of Record: 

I am responsible for preparing a record in this appeal but I am unable to file the record by the original due 

date for the following reason/s: (Check all that apply-attach additional pages if necessary.)

___ to the best of my knowledge, the Appellant has made no claim of indigence and has failed to 

either pay the required fee or to make arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the record.

___ my duties listed below preclude working on this record: 

_X__ Other. (Explain): I was unaware of this appeal until today 11.27.2017 when asked about it by 

court reporter Ellen Earles.

I anticipate this record will be completed and forwarded to the 12th Court of Appeals by 12.11.2017 and I 

hereby request and additional 55 days within which to prepare it. TEX.R.APP.P.37.3.

In compliance with TEX.R.APP.P.9.5(e), I certify that a copy of this notice has been served on counsel 

for all parties to the trial Court’s judgment or order being appealed. I further certify by my signature 

below that the information contained in this notice is true and within my personal knowledge. 

November 27, 2017 ___________________________________ 

Date Signature 

903-723-7823 Teresa Woodall

Office Phone Number Printed Name

 Deputy Clerk

 Official Title

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 11/27/2017 2:08:39 PM PAM ESTES Clerk
TEXAS RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 9.5(e) reads:

Certificate requirements. A certificate of service must be signed by the person who made the 

service and must state:

(1) the date and manner of service;

(2) the name and address of each person served; and

(3) if the person served is a party’s attorney, the name of the party represented by that 

attorney.

The following parties have been served with a copy of this document:

(Information may be either printed or typed.)

Lead Counsel for APPELLANT(S): Lead Counsel for APPELLEE(S):

Name: MARK CARGILL Name: ALLYSON MITCHELL

Address: 701 N. ELM STREET Address: 500 N CHURCH RM 38

PALESTINE, TX 75801 Palestine, TX 75801

Phone No.: 903-729-8011 Phone No: 903-723-7400

Attorney For: JUSTIN MEREDITH Attorney For: STATE OF TEXAS

Additional information, if any:
#### RONALD GREENE v. L. B. JACKSON.

(Filed 15 December, 1926.)

Appeal from *Armfield, Emergency Judge,*at May Term, 1926, of BlJNCOMBE.

Civil action to recover damages for an alleged breach of a rental contract.

From a verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff, the defendant appeals, assigning errors.

*Marie W. Brown and Glinton K. Hughes for plaintiff.*

*Lee, Ford & Goxe for defendant.*

Pee Curiam.

This case was before ns on demurrer at the Fall Term,. 1925, 190 N. C., 789. On the second trial in thé Superior Court, from which the present appeal is prosecuted, the controversy narrowed itself principally to issues of fact, determinable alone by a jury. A careful perusal of the record leaves us with the impression that the case has been tried substantially in accord with the principles of law applicable, and that the validity of the trial should be sustained. All matters in dispute have been settled by the verdict, and no action on the part of the trial court has been discovered by us which we apprehend should be held for reversible error, even though some of the rulings are not altogether free from difficulty.

We have concluded that the exceptions relating to the admission and exclusion of evidence, and those to the charge, should be resolved in favor of the validity of the trial. The case presents no new question of law, or one not heretofore settled by our decisions. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

October 26, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-1683

Bystronic Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
Consent(Director)


EXHIBIT 10.02

LEGACY WINE & SPIRITS INTERNATIONAL LTD.

(the “Company”)

CONSENT TO ACT AS DIRECTOR

I hereby consent to act as a director of the Company and acknowledge that I am not disqualified to become or to act as a director under Chapter 78 of the Nevada Revised Statutes.

I hereby confirm that:

1.

I am not under the age of 18 years;

2.

I have not been found by a court, in the United States of America or elsewhere, to be incapable of managing my own affairs;

3.

I am not an undischarged bankrupt; and

4.

I have not been convicted in or out of Nevada of an offence in connection with the promotion, formation or management of a corporation or unincorporated business, or of an offence involving fraud.




In addition, the undersigned hereby consents to the holding of any meeting of the directors or of a committee of the directors of the Company by means of such telephonic, electronic or other communication facility, as permit all persons participating in the subject meetings to communicate adequately with each other.




This consent shall continue in effect from year to year so long as the undersigned is re-elected to the board of directors, provided that in the event that the undersigned revokes this consent or resigns from the board of directors, this consent shall cease to have effect from the date of receipt in writing by the Company of such revocation or resignation, as the case may be, or, if the latter, the effective date of such resignation.

DIRECTORS HAVE SUBSTANTIAL DUTIES AND OBLIGATIONS AND MAY BE SUBJECT TO SIGNIFICANT LIABILITIES. THE PERSON SIGNING THIS CONSENT SHOULD OBTAIN INDEPENDENT LEGAL ADVICE.

		
	Dated:

	June 24, 2011


	Print name:

	Sharon Deutsch 


	Address:

	 

35 South Ocean Avenue

Patchogue, New York

11772


	Signature

	/s/: Sharon Deutsch
| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      November 6, 2009 | /s/      Ronald S. Saks                                                 |
|-----------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                        | Ronald      S. Saks                                                     |
|                        | Chief      Executive Officer(Principal      Executive Officer)          |
|                        |                                                                    |
|                        |                                                                    |
| Date:      November 6, 2009 | /s/      Lawrence E. Dickinson                                          |
|                        | Lawrence      E. Dickinson                                              |
|                        | Vice      President, Chief Financial Officer, and Secretary             |
|                        | (Principal      Financial Officer and PrincipalAccounting      Officer) |
---

Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002




I, Maury
Austin, certify, that to my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
MIPS Technologies, Inc. for the three months ended September 30, 2008 (the
“Form 10-Q”), to which
this certificate is an exhibit fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
and that information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MIPS
Technologies, Inc. for the three month period covered by the
Form 10-Q.




Date:
      November 7, 2008
            By:
            /s/ MAURY AUSTIN
              Maury
      Austin
              Vice President and Chief
      Financial Officer,
              MIPS Technologies,
      Inc












A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided by MIPS Technologies and will be retained by it and furnished to the
Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


---