alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-10498

Soaptronic, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER 
PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
John E. Bourgoin, certify, to the best of my knowledge, that based upon a review of the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MIPS Technologies, Inc. for the three months ended
December 31, 2003 (the Form 10-Q), the Form 10-Q fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of MIPS Technologies, Inc. for the three
month period covered by the Form 10-Q.

|                          |                                      
|------------------------- | -------------------------------------
|                          |                                      
|                          |                                      
|                         
|Dated:  February 11, 2004 | By:     /s/ JOHN E. BOURGOIN         
|                          | John E. Bourgoin                     
|                          | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                          | MIPS Technologies, Inc.              

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided by MIPS Technologies and will be
retained by it and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           3,667
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,505
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,644
<INVENTORY>                                     67,965
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               123,455
<PP&E>                                          18,111
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,908
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 227,342
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,045
<BONDS>                                         76,371
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           178
<OTHER-SE>                                     101,889
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   227,342
<SALES>                                         77,850
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                77,850
<CGS>                                           54,731
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   54,731
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,850
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    271
<INCOME-TAX>                                       334
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (63)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (63)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 28, 2022

No. 04-22-00779-CR

EX PARTE Cristian HERRERA-GREGORIO,

From the County Court, Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12251CR

Honorable Tully Shahan, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The reporter’s record was due on September 26, 2022. On November 21, 2022, the court 

reporter filed a notice of late record indicating the reporter’s record was not filed because 

appellant did not request a record. If appellant wishes for a reporter’s record to be considered on 

appeal, it is ORDERED that appellant provide written proof to this court no later than December 

8, 2022 that either (1) the reporter’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay 

the reporter’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the reporter’s fee. If 

appellant fails to respond within the time provided, the court will consider only those issues or 

points raised in appellant’s brief that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See TEX. 

R. APP. P. 37.3(c).

_________________________________

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 28th day of November, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-7054

WILLIAM G. WILCOX,

Claimant-Appellant,

v.

ERIC K. SHINSEKI,

Secretary of Veterans Affairs,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in

07-1874, Judge Donald L. Ivers.

ON MOTION

Before LINN Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Counsel for William G. Wilcox submits a motion "for appearance pro hac vice"

and moves for an extension of time to file an entry of appearance, certificate of interest,

docketing statement, and his brief.

To become a member of the bar of this court, counsel should fill out the

appropriate application and pay the admission fee. See Fed. Cir. R. 46. Admission pro

hac vice is not appropriate. With respect to the extension motion, Wilcox has submitted

the certificate of interest.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:
The motion for appearance pro hac vice is denied. Counsel should apply

for membership with the bar of this court within 30 days.

The motion for an extension of time is granted. Wilcox's docketing

statement and counsel's entry of appearance are due within 30 days of the date of filing

of this order.	Wilcox's brief is due within 60 days of the date of filing of this order.

FOR THE COURT

MAY -1 2009

/s/ Jan Horbalv

Date Jan Horbaly

Clerk gittalikri

cc:	Albert W.L. Moore, Jr., Esq.

Ellen M. Lynch, Esq.

s17

MAY I 2000

JAN HORLiALI CLERK

2009-7054	2
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 7, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-11470

ESCO Group LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China. 

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2606

Price Pump Company:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-10500

A.W. Chesterton Company:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-11-0000013

22-MAY-2015

07:53 AM
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Docket ID: DoD-2015-OS-0090]

# AGENCY:

United States Transportation Command (USTRANSCOM), DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The DoD is not proceeding with the proposed Defense Personal Property Program (DP3) Household Goods Channeling Pilot Test, as set forth in the September 8, 2015 notice (80 FR 53786). We appreciate all inputs made toward providing the information necessary to reach this conclusion.

      ( print page 8181)    
Dated: February 11, 2016.

Aaron Siegel,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 2016-03290 Filed 2-17-16; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2335

Reelcraft Industries:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4102 

To amend title XVI of the Social Security Act to update the resource limit 

for supplemental security income eligibility. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 28, 2022 

Mr. BROWN (for himself and Mr. PORTMAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVI of the Social Security Act to update 

the resource limit for supplemental security income eligibility. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘SSI Savings Penalty 

5 Elimination Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. UPDATE IN ELIGIBILITY FOR THE SUPPLEMENTAL 

7 SECURITY INCOME PROGRAM. 

8 (a) UPDATE IN RESOURCE LIMIT FOR INDIVIDUALS

9 AND COUPLES.—Section 1611(a)(3) of such Act (42 

10 U.S.C. 1382(a)(3)) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4102 IS

1 (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘$2,250’’ 

2 and all that follows through the end of the subpara3 graph and inserting ‘‘$20,000 in calendar year 

4 2022, and shall be increased as described in section 

5 1617(d) for each subsequent calendar year.’’; and 

6 (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘$1,500’’ 

7 and all that follows through the end of the subpara8 graph and inserting ‘‘$10,000 in calendar year 

9 2022, and shall be increased as described in section 

10 1617(d) for each subsequent calendar year.’’. 

11 (b) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.—Section 1617 of such 

12 Act (42 U.S.C. 1382f) is amended— 

13 (1) in the section heading, by inserting ‘‘; IN14 FLATION ADJUSTMENT’’ after ‘‘BENEFITS’’; and 

15 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

16 ‘‘(d) In the case of any calendar year after 2022, each 

17 of the amounts specified in section 1611(a)(3) shall be in18 creased by multiplying each such amount by the quotient 

19 (not less than 1) obtained by dividing— 

20 ‘‘(1) the average of the consumer price index 

21 for all urban consumers (all items; United States 

22 city average, as published by the Bureau of Labor 

23 Statistics of the Department of Labor) for the 12- 

24 month period ending with September of the pre25 ceding calendar year, by 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4102 IS

1 ‘‘(2) such average for the 12-month period end2 ing with September 2021.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4130 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4130

   To repeal changes made by health care reform laws to the Medicare 
    exception to the prohibition on certain physician referrals for 
                   hospitals, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 3, 2022

Mr. Lankford (for himself, Mr. Marshall, Mr. Boozman, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. 
 Young, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Cruz, Mr. Cotton, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Tillis, Mr. 
 Cassidy, and Mr. Paul) introduced the following bill; which was read 
             twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To repeal changes made by health care reform laws to the Medicare 
    exception to the prohibition on certain physician referrals for 
                   hospitals, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Patient Access to Higher Quality 
Health Care Act of 2022''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF HEALTH CARE REFORM PROVISIONS LIMITING MEDICARE 
              EXCEPTION TO THE PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN PHYSICIAN 
              REFERRALS FOR HOSPITALS.

    Sections 6001 and 10601 of the Patient Protection and Affordable 
Care Act (Public Law 111-148; 124 Stat. 684, 1005) and section 1106 of 
the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Public Law 
111-152; 124 Stat. 1049) are repealed and the provisions of law amended 
by such sections are restored as if such sections had never been 
enacted.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 47 (Friday, March 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13178-13179]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5910]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-30,620]


Woodward Governor Company; Stevens Point, WI; Amended 
Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment 
Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on February 14, 1995 applicable 
to the workers engaged in employment related to the production of 
aircraft fuel controls at the subject firm.
    The certification notice will soon be published in the Federal 
Register.
    At the request of the State Agency and the company, the Department 
reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The 
findings show that some production was in hydromatic controls. The 
workers were not entirely separately identifiable by product line and 
the plant will close in 1995. Accordingly, the Department is amending 
the certification to include all [[Page 13179]] workers at Woodward 
Governor Company in Stevens Point, Wisconsin.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers who were adversely affected at Stevens Point, Wisconsin by 
increased imports.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-30,620 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    ``All workers of Woodward Governor Company, Stevens Point, 
Wisconsin who became totally or partially separated from employment 
on or after December 22, 1993 are eligible to apply for adjustment 
assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.''

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 3rd day of March, 1995.
Victor J. Trunzo,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 95-5910 Filed 3-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 45 (Wednesday, March 8, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 12823]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5820]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS


Ad Hoc Structure Committee on Governance Meeting

TIME AND DATE: The Legal Services Corporation Board of Directors Ad Hoc 
Structure Committee on Governance will meet on March 17, 1995. The 
meeting will commence at 9:00 a.m.

PLACE: The Legal Services Corporation, 750 1st Street, N.E., The Board 
Room, Washington, D.C. 20002, (202) 336-8800.

STATUS OF MEETING: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Open Session

    1. Approval of Agenda.
    2. Approval of Minutes of February 16, 1995 Meeting.
    3. Consider Board's Relationship With the Corporation's 
Inspector General.
    4. Consider Board's Relationship With Corporation Management.
    5. Consider Issues Related to Board Meetings.
    6. Consider and Act on Other Business.

CONTACT PERSON FOR INFORMATION: Patricia Batie, (202) 336-8800.
    Upon request, meeting notices will be made available in alternate 
formats to accommodate visual and hearing impairments.
    Individuals who have a disability and need an accommodation to 
attend the meeting may notify Patricia Batie at (202) 336-8800.

    Date Issued: March 6, 1995.
Patricia D. Batie,
Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-5820 Filed 3-6-95; 1:41 pm]
BILLING CODE 7050-01-M