alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4044 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4044

   To amend the Disaster Recovery Reform Act of 2018 to require the 
  President to automatically waive certain critical document fees for 
   individuals and households affected by major disasters for which 
  assistance is provided under the Individuals and Households Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 7, 2022

Mr. Hickenlooper (for himself and Mr. Bennet) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Disaster Recovery Reform Act of 2018 to require the 
  President to automatically waive certain critical document fees for 
   individuals and households affected by major disasters for which 
  assistance is provided under the Individuals and Households Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Replacing Essential Passports and 
Licenses After Certain Emergencies Act'' or the ``REPLACE Act''.

SEC. 2. CRITICAL DOCUMENT FEE WAIVER.

    Section 1238(a) of the Disaster Recovery Reform Act of 2018 (42 
U.S.C. 5174b) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ``applies regardless'' 
        and inserting ``and the requirement of the President to waive 
        fees under paragraph (4) apply regardless'';
            (2) by redesignating paragraph (4) as paragraph (5); and
            (3) by inserting after paragraph (3) the following:
            ``(4) Mandatory automatic waiver.--The President, in 
        consultation with the Governor of a State, shall automatically 
        provide a fee waiver described in paragraph (1) to an 
        individual or household that has been adversely affected by a 
        major disaster declared under section 401 of the Robert T. 
        Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 
        U.S.C. 5170)--
                    ``(A) for which the President provides assistance 
                to individuals and households under section 408 of that 
                Act (42 U.S.C. 5174); and
                    ``(B) that destroyed a critical document described 
                in paragraph (1) of the individual or household.''.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 (a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT I, Jack H. Brown, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Stater Bros. Holdings Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting. Date: December 21, 2004 /s/ Jack H. BrownJack H. BrownChairman of the Board, President,and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3957 

AN ACT 

To amend the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act to 

make certain activities eligible for grants from the Abandoned Mine Reclamation Fund, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 3957 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Safeguarding Treat3 ment for the Restoration of Ecosystems from Abandoned 

4 Mines Act’’ or the ‘‘STREAM Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. LONG-TERM ABANDONED MINE LAND RECLAMA6 TION. 

7 Section 40701(c) of the Infrastructure Investment 

8 and Jobs Act (30 U.S.C. 1231a(c)) is amended— 

9 (1) by striking ‘‘Grants under’’ and inserting 

10 the following: 

11 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para12 graph (2), grants under’’; and 

13 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

14 ‘‘(2) LONG-TERM ABANDONED MINE LAND REC15 LAMATION.— 

16 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Not more than 30 

17 percent of the total amount of a grant made 

18 annually under subsection (b)(1) may be re19 tained by the recipient of the grant if those 

20 amounts are deposited into a long-term aban21 doned mine land reclamation fund established 

22 under State law, from which amounts (together 

23 with all interest earned on the amounts) are ex24 pended by the State or Indian Tribe, as appli25 cable, for— 
3 

†S 3957 ES

1 ‘‘(i) the abatement of the causes and 

2 the treatment of the effects of acid mine 

3 drainage resulting from coal mining prac4 tices, including for the costs of building, 

5 operating, maintaining, and rehabilitating 

6 acid mine drainage treatment systems; 

7 ‘‘(ii) the prevention, abatement, and 

8 control of subsidence; or 

9 ‘‘(iii) the prevention, abatement, and 

10 control of coal mine fires. 

11 ‘‘(B) REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.—Each 

12 recipient of a grant under subsection (b)(1) 

13 that deposits grant amounts into a long-term 

14 abandoned mine land reclamation fund under 

15 subparagraph (A) shall— 

16 ‘‘(i) offer amendments to the inven17 tory maintained under section 403(c) of 

18 the Surface Mining Control and Reclama19 tion Act of 1977 (30 U.S.C. 1233(c)) to 

20 reflect the use of the amounts for— 

21 ‘‘(I) acid mine drainage abate22 ment and treatment; 

23 ‘‘(II) subsidence prevention, 

24 abatement, and control; and 
4 

†S 3957 ES

1 ‘‘(III) coal mine fire prevention, 

2 abatement, and control; and 

3 ‘‘(ii) include in the annual grant re4 port of the recipient information on the 

5 status and balance of amounts in the long6 term abandoned mine land reclamation 

7 fund. 

8 ‘‘(C) TERM.—Amounts retained under 

9 subparagraph (A) shall not be subject to— 

10 ‘‘(i) subsection (d)(4)(B); or 

11 ‘‘(ii) any other limitation on the 

12 length of the term of an annual grant 

13 under subsection (b)(1).’’. 

Passed the Senate December 15, 2022. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3957 

AN ACT 

To amend the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs 

and for other purposes. from the Abandoned Mine Reclamation Fund, Act to make certain activities eligible for grants
EXHIBIT 13.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of
Lorus Therapeutics Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ended May 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Aiping H. Young, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:


|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: November 21, 2006




/s/ Aiping H. Young Aiping H. Young President and
Chief Executive Officer


---
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2147

Cedar Electronics Corporation:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 47 (Friday, March 10, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 13079]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5987]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
50 CFR Part 672

[Docket No. 950206041-5041-01; I.D. 030695D]


Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska; Pacific Cod in the Western 
Regulatory Area

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Closure.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS is closing the directed fishery for Pacific cod by 
vessels catching Pacific cod for processing by the offshore component 
in the Western Regulatory Area of the Gulf of Alaska (GOA). This action 
is necessary to prevent exceeding the allocation of Pacific cod for the 
offshore component in this area.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 12 noon, Alaska local time (A.l.t.), March 7, 1995, 
until 12 midnight, A.l.t., December 31, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew N. Smoker, 907-586-7228.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The groundfish fishery in the GOA exclusive 
economic zone is managed by NMFS according to the Fishery Management 
Plan for Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska (FMP) prepared by the North 
Pacific Fishery Management Council under authority of the Magnuson 
Fishery Conservation and Management Act. Fishing by U.S. vessels is 
governed by regulations implementing the FMP at 50 CFR parts 620 and 
672.
    In accordance with Sec. 672.20(c)(1)(ii)(B), the allocation of 
Pacific cod for the offshore component in the Western Regulatory Area 
was established by the final groundfish specifications (60 FR 8470, 
February 14, 1995), as 2,010 metric tons (mt).
    The Director, Alaska Region, NMFS (Regional Director), has 
determined, in accordance with Sec. 672.20(c)(2)(ii), that the 
allocation of Pacific cod total allowable catch for the offshore 
component in the Western Regulatory Area soon will be reached. The 
Regional Director established a directed fishing allowance of 1,510 mt, 
with consideration that 500 mt will be taken as incidental catch in 
directed fishing for other species in the Western Regulatory Area. The 
Regional Director has determined that the directed fishing allowance 
has been reached. Consequently, NMFS is prohibiting directed fishing 
for Pacific cod by operators of vessels catching Pacific cod for 
processing by the offshore component in the Western Regulatory Area.
    Directed fishing standards for applicable gear types may be found 
in the regulations at Sec. 672.20(g).

Classification

    This action is taken under 50 CFR 672.20 and is exempt from review 
under E.O. 12866.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: March 6, 1995.
David S. Crestin,
Acting Director, Office of Fisheries Conservation and Management, 
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 95-5987 Filed 3-7-95; 2:29 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
#### H.M. Village Realty, Appellant, v Ken Caccavale, Respondent.

[773 NYS2d 543]

*290Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Steven Liebman, Special Ref.), entered December 6, 2002, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, awarded defendant legal fees and costs, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order, same court (Emily Goodman, J.), entered on or about September 25, 2000, granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denying plaintiff’s cross motion for summary judgment, unanimously dismissed, without costs.

Plaintiff is the landlord of premises at 39 Jane Street in Manhattan, where defendant tenant has resided since 1974. The dispute arises out of an illegal alteration defendant allegedly made to his apartment in 1979 by enlarging an existing balcony.

The broad reading accorded to Real Property Law § 234 warrants recovery of legal fees by the tenant herein *(see Lynch v Leibman,*177 AD2d 453 [1991]). While defendant’s breach of the lease in making unauthorized alterations must be taken into consideration in determining the appropriateness of an award of legal fees *(see Ram I v Stuart,*248 AD2d 255 [1998]), plaintiffs knowledge of, and acquiescence in, the construction of the balcony extension operated as a waiver *(see 350 E. 62nd St. Assoc. v Vecilla,*182 Misc 2d 68 [1999]). Defendant’s counterclaim for attorneys’ fees was not extinguished upon dismissal of the landlord’s main claim. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Nardelli, Saxe and Marlow, JJ.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2867

Curtis Instruments, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 13, 2013

jam

Order 

Clerk

November 13, 2013

147997 (3)

ROBERT REEVES, 

Plaintiff, 

v SC: 147997

AGC: 1628/13

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, 

Defendant.

___________________________________

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it 

is DENIED because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be 

liable for filing fees. 

Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the 

Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $37.00, shall submit a copy of this order 

with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned 

with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being 

filed in this Court.

If plaintiff timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly 

payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of 

the deposits made to plaintiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of 

$338.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court.

Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file further appeals in civil 

actions in this Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. 

The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff and 

return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.
REAFFIRMATION OF GUARANTY


 


REAFFIRMATION OF GUARANTY, dated as of June 24, 2011, made by Zoo Games, Inc. (the “Guarantor”) in favor of Panta Distribution, LLC (“Panta”), in respect of the Guaranty, as defined below.


 


RECITALS


 


WHEREAS, Zoo Publishing, Inc., a New Jersey corporation (the “Company”) is party to that certain Factoring and Security Agreement, dated as of September 9, 2011 (as amended, supplemented or otherwise modified, the “Factoring Agreement”), by and between the Company and Working Capital Solutions, Inc.


 


WHEREAS, pursuant to the Factoring Agreement, the Guarantor made that certain Continuing Unconditional Guaranty, dated as of September 9, 2011 (the “Guaranty”), in favor of Working Capital Solutions, Inc.


 


WHEREAS, pursuant to that certain Limited Recourse Assignment, dated the date hereof, by Working Capital Solutions, Inc. to Panta (the “Limited Recourse Assignment”), Working Capital Solutions, Inc. assigned the Factoring Agreement and Guaranty to Panta.


 


WHEREAS, immediately after the assignment of the Factoring Agreement and Guaranty pursuant to the Limited Recourse Assignment, the Company and Panta amended and restated the Factoring Agreement as set forth in that certain Amended and Restated Factoring, Security and Purchase Order Financing Agreement, dated as of the date hereof, by and between the Company and Panta (the “Amended and Restated Factoring Agreement”).


 


WHEREAS, the Guarantor wishes to reaffirm that the provisions of the Guaranty shall remain in full force and effect upon the effectiveness of the Amended and Restated Factoring Agreement and as otherwise provided herein;


 


WHEREAS, the Guarantor wishes to reaffirm the Guaranty in favor of Panta.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the Guarantor agrees as follows:


 


1.           The Guarantor hereby acknowledges receipt of the Amended and Restated Factoring Agreement and consents to the terms and execution thereof;


 


2.           The Guarantor hereby reaffirms all obligations to Panta pursuant to the terms of the Guaranty and acknowledges that the guarantee contained in the Guaranty is continuing and in full force and effect in favor of Panta.


 


3.           The Guarantor acknowledges that Panta may amend, restate, extend, renew or otherwise modify the Amended and Restated Factoring Agreement and any indebtedness or agreement of the Company, or enter into any agreement or extend additional or other credit accommodations, without notifying or obtaining the consent of the Guarantor and without impairing the liability of the Guarantor under the Guaranty for all of the Company’s present and future indebtedness to Panta.


 



	
GUARANTOR:


	 
	
ZOO GAMES, INC.


	 
	
By:

	
/s/ David Fremed


	  	
Name: David Fremed


	  	
Title: CFO