13750 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 49 / Tuesday, March 14, 1995 / Notices

of the community concerns cited by the

Board in its amendment, the FAA has

no assurance that the project will be

implemented until the community

involvement and all other concerns

associated with the ongoing master plan

update are addressed. Therefore, the

FAA is disapproving this project at this

time.

Brief Description of Project

Withdrawn: Runway safety project.

Determination: This project was

withdrawn by the Jackson Hole Airport

Board by letter dated October 25, 1994.

Decision Date: January 25, 1995.

For Further Information Contact:

Philip Braden, Denver Airports District

Office, (303) 286–5530.

Public Agency: CharlottesvilleAlbermarle Airport Authority,

Charlottesville, Virginia.

Application Number: 94–05–I–00–

CHO.

Application Type: Impose PFC

revenue.

PFC Level: $3.00.

Total Approved Net PFC Revenue:

$1,524,300.

Charge Effective Date: April 1, 1995.

Estimated Charge Expiration Date:

April 1, 1999.

Classes of Air Carriers Not Required

To Collect PFC’s: (1) Air taxi/

commercial operators filing FAA Form

1800–31 and (2) foreign air carriers.

Determination: Approved. Based on

information submitted in the

Charlottesville-Albermarle Airport

Authority’s application, the FAA has

determined that each proposed class

accounts for less than 1 percent of the

Charlottesville-Albermarle Airport’s

total annual enplanements.

Brief Description of Projects Approved

for Collection Only:

Acquire snow blower and broom,

Snow loader/plow,

Overlay runway 3–21,

Runway deicing vehicle,

Aircraft rescue and firefighting vehicle,

Extend runway 3, safety area.

Decision Date: January 26, 1995.

For Further Information Contact:

Robert Mendez, Washington Airports

District Office, (703) 285–2570.

Public Agency: Sarasota Manatee

Airport Authority, Sarasota, Florida.

Application Number: 95–02–U–00–

SRQ.

Application Type: Use PFC revenue.

PFC Level: $3.00.

Total Approved Net PFC Revenue:

$38,715,000.

Charge Effective Date: September 1,

1992.

Estimated Charge Expiration Date:

September 1, 2005.

Class of Air Carriers Not Required To

Collect PFC’s: The Sarasota Manatee

Airport Authority has previously been

approved to exclude air taxi/commercial

operators filing FAA Form 1800–31.

Determination: No change from

previously approved application.

Brief Description of Projects Approved

for Use:

Federal Aviation Regulations Part 150

program funding,

Environmental assessment,

Runway protection zone land

acquisition,

Rehabilitate taxiway ‘‘A’’,

Rehabilitate taxiway ‘‘F’’ (formerly

taxiway ‘‘I’’).

Decision Date: January 31, 1995.

For Further Information Contact: Pegy

Jones, Orlando Airports District Office,

(407) 648–6582.

AMENDMENTS TO PFC APPROVALS

Amendment No.: City, state Amendment

approved date

Amended approved net

PFC revenue

Original approved net

PFC revenue

Estimated

charge exp.

date

Amended estimated charge

exp. date

92–01–C–01–TWF, Twin Falls, ID ....................................... 01/09/95 $310,500 $270,000 05/01/98 05/01/98

93–02–U–01–TUL, Tulsa, OK .............................................. 12/06/94 $14,818,000 $8,450,000 08/01/94 03/01/96

Issued in Washington, D.C. on March 7,

1995.

Kendall L. Ball,

Passenger Facility Charge Branch.

[FR Doc. 95–6276 Filed 3–13–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

Federal Highway Administration

Environmental Impact Statement: City

of Charlottesville and Albemarle

County, VA

AGENCY: Federal Highway

Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Cancellation of the Notice of

Intent.

SUMMARY: This notice rescinds the

previous Notice of Intent issued on

October 3, 1984, to prepare an

environmental impact statement for a

proposal to provide a four-lane divided

facility from the intersection of existing

McIntire Road and Preston Avenue to an

intersection with Rio Road. The

proposed highway project involved in

part the upgrading of an existing twolane facility to a four-lane divided

roadway. The remaining part of the

proposed highway project called for a

four-lane facility on new location.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Bruce Turner, Transportation

Planner, Federal Highway

Administration, 1504 Santa Rosa Road,

Suite 205, Richmond, Virginia 23229,

Telephone (804) 281–5111.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: When the

Notice of Intent was published, there

was reason to believe that one or more

of the alternatives might significantly

affect the environment. However, after

conducting exhaustive environmental

studies of all the alternatives under

consideration, documenting this

information in a draft Environmental

Impact Statement, circulating the draft

EIS for comment, and holding the

location public hearing, a reduced

alternative without any significant

environmental impacts was selected to

meet the proposed project’s purpose and

need.

Therefore, in accordance with Federal

regulations, the selected alternative is

considered a Class III Action, and the

assessment of the environmental

impacts will be finalized and

documented with an Environmental

Assessment.

J. Bruce Turner,

Transportation Planner, Richmond, Virginia.

[FR Doc. 95–6182 Filed 3–13–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–22–M

Federal Railroad Administration

Notice of Application for Approval of

Discontinuance or Modification of a

Railroad Signal System or Relief from

the Requirements of 49 CFR Part 236

Pursuant to 49 CFR Part 235 and 49

U.S.C. App. 26, the following railroads

have petitioned the Federal Railroad

Administration (FRA) seeking approval

for the discontinuance or modification

of the signal system or relief from the

requirements of 49 CFR Part 236 as

detailed below.