6810 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 9, 2016 / Proposed Rules 

§ 3280.2 Definitions. 

* * * * * 

Manufactured home means a 

structure, transportable in one or more 

sections, which in the traveling mode is 

8 body feet or more in width or 40 body 

feet or more in length or which when 

erected on-site is 320 or more square 

feet, and which is built on a permanent 

chassis and designed to be used as a 

dwelling with or without a permanent 

foundation when connected to the 

required utilities, and includes the 

plumbing, heating, air-conditioning, and 

electrical systems contained in the 

structure. This term includes all 

structures that meet the above 

requirements except the size 

requirements and with respect to which 

the manufacturer voluntarily files a 

certification pursuant to § 3282.13 of 

this chapter and complies with the 

construction and safety standards set 

forth in this part. The term does not 

include any recreational vehicle as 

specified in § 3282.15 of this chapter. 

Calculations used to determine the 

number of square feet in a structure will 

include the total of square feet for each 

transportable section comprising the 

completed structure and will be based 

on the structure’s exterior dimensions 

measured at the largest horizontal 

projections when erected on site. These 

dimensions will include all expandable 

rooms, cabinets, and other projections 

containing interior space, but do not 

include bay windows. Nothing in this 

definition should be interpreted to mean 

that a manufactured home necessarily 

meets the requirements of HUD’s 

Minimum Property Standards (HUD 

Handbook 4900.1) or that it is 

automatically eligible for financing 

under 12 U.S.C. 1709(b). 

* * * * * 

PART 3282—MANUFACTURED HOME 

PROCEDURAL AND ENFORCEMENT 

REGULATIONS 

■ 3. The authority citation for part 3282 

is revised to read as follows: 

Authority: 28 U.S.C. 2461, 42 U.S.C. 

3535(d), 5403, and 5424. 

§ 3282.8 [Amended] 

■ 4. In § 3282.8, remove and reserve 

paragraph (g). 

■ 5. Add § 3282.15 to subpart A to read 

as follows: 

§ 3282.15 Exception for recreational 

vehicles. 

(a) Exception. A recreational vehicle 

that meets the requirements of this 

section is exempt from 24 CFR parts 

3280 and 3282. 

(b) Definition. A Recreational Vehicle 

is: 

(1) A factory built vehicular structure, 

not certified as a manufactured home; 

(2) Designed only for recreational use 

and not as a primary residence or for 

permanent occupancy; and is either: 

(3) Built and certified in accordance 

with either the NFPA 1192–15, 

Standard for Recreational Vehicles or 

ANSI A119.5–15, Recreational Park 

Trailer Standard as provided by 

paragraph (c) of this section; or 

(4) Any vehicle which is selfpropelled. 

(c) Notice and certification 

requirements. In order to be exempt, an 

ANSI A119.5–15 certified recreational 

vehicle must contain a Notice 

prominently displayed in a temporary 

manner in the kitchen (i.e., countertop 

or exposed cabinet face) which must 

read as follows: 

(1) Title of Notice. The title of the 

Notice shall be ‘‘*****NOTICE*****’’ 

which shall be legible and typed using 

bold letters at least 1 inch in size. 

(2) Content of Notice. The content of 

the notice text shall be as follows: 

The Manufacturer of this unit certifies that 

it is a Park Model Recreational Vehicle 

designed only for recreational use, and not 

for use as a primary residence or for 

permanent occupancy. The manufacturer of 

this unit further certifies that this unit has 

been built in accordance with the ANSI 

A119.5–15 consensus standard for Park 

Model Recreational Vehicles. 

(3) Text of Notice. The text of the 

Notice, aside from the Notice’s title 

shall be legible and typed using letters 

at least 1⁄2 inch in size. 

(4) Removal of Notice. The Notice 

shall not be removed by any party until 

the entire sales transaction has been 

completed. A sales transaction is 

considered complete as defined under 

§ 3282.252(b). 

Dated: January 4, 2016. 

Edward L. Golding, 

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Housing. 

[FR Doc. 2016–02387 Filed 2–8–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4210–67–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Saint Lawrence Seaway Development 

Corporation 

33 CFR Part 402 

[Docket No. SLSDC 2016–0003] 

RIN 2135–AA38 

Tariff of Tolls 

AGENCY: Saint Lawrence Seaway 

Development Corporation, DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. 

SUMMARY: The Saint Lawrence Seaway 

Development Corporation (SLSDC) and 

the St. Lawrence Seaway Management 

Corporation (SLSMC) of Canada, under 

international agreement, jointly publish 

and presently administer the St. 

Lawrence Seaway Tariff of Tolls in their 

respective jurisdictions. The Tariff sets 

forth the level of tolls assessed on all 

commodities and vessels transiting the 

facilities operated by the SLSDC and the 

SLSMC. The SLSDC is revising its 

regulations to reflect the fees and 

charges levied by the SLSMC in Canada 

starting in the 2016 navigation season, 

which are effective only in Canada. An 

amendment to increase the minimum 

charge per lock for those vessels that are 

not pleasure craft or subject in Canada 

to tolls under items 1 and 2 of the Tariff 

for full or partial transit of the Seaway 

will apply in the U.S. (See 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.) 

DATES: Comments are due March 10, 

2016. 

ADDRESSES: Docket: For access to the 

docket to read background documents 

or comments received, go to http://

www.Regulations.gov; or in person at 

the Docket Management Facility; U.S. 

Department of Transportation, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building 

Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 

Washington, DC 20590–001, between 9 

a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, except Federal Holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Carrie Mann Lavigne, Chief Counsel, 

Saint Lawrence Seaway Development 

Corporation, 180 Andrews Street, 

Massena, New York 13662; 315/764– 

3200. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Saint 

Lawrence Seaway Development 

Corporation (SLSDC) and the St. 

Lawrence Seaway Management 

Corporation (SLSMC) of Canada, under 

international agreement, jointly publish 

and presently administer the St. 

Lawrence Seaway Tariff of Tolls 

(Schedule of Fees and Charges in 

Canada) in their respective jurisdictions. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 9, 2016 / Proposed Rules 6811 

The Tariff sets forth the level of tolls 

assessed on all commodities and vessels 

transiting the facilities operated by the 

SLSDC and the SLSMC. The SLSDC is 

proposing to revise 33 CFR 402.12, 

‘‘Schedule of tolls’’, to reflect the fees 

and charges levied by the SLSMC in 

Canada beginning in the 2016 

navigation season. With one exception, 

the changes affect the tolls for 

commercial vessels and are applicable 

only in Canada. The collection of tolls 

by the SLSDC on commercial vessels 

transiting the U.S. locks is waived by 

law (33 U.S.C. 988a(a)). Accordingly, no 

notice or comment is necessary on these 

amendments. 

The SLSDC is proposing to amend 33 

CFR 402.12, ‘‘Schedule of tolls’’, to 

increase the minimum charge per vessel 

per lock for full or partial transit of the 

Seaway from $26.92 to $27.46. This 

charge is for vessels that are not 

pleasure craft or subject in Canada to 

the tolls under items 1 and 2 of the 

Tariff. This increase is due to higher 

operating costs at the locks. 

Regulatory Notices: Privacy Act: 

Anyone is able to search the electronic 

form of all comments received into any 

of our dockets by the name of the 

individual submitting the comment (or 

signing the comment, if submitted on 

behalf of an association, business, labor 

union, etc.). You may review DOT’s 

complete Privacy Act Statement in the 

Federal Register published on April 11, 

2000 (Volume 65, Number 70; Pages 

19477–78) or you may visit http://

dms.dot.gov. 

Regulatory Evaluation 

This proposed regulation involves a 

foreign affairs function of the United 

States and therefore Executive Order 

12866 does not apply and evaluation 

under the Department of 

Transportation’s Regulatory Policies and 

Procedures is not required. 

Regulatory Flexibility Act 

Determination 

I certify this proposed regulation will 

not have a significant economic impact 

on a substantial number of small 

entities. The St. Lawrence Seaway Tariff 

of Tolls primarily relate to commercial 

users of the Seaway, the vast majority of 

whom are foreign vessel operators. 

Therefore, any resulting costs will be 

borne mostly by foreign vessels. 

Environmental Impact 

This proposed regulation does not 

require an environmental impact 

statement under the National 

Environmental Policy Act (49 U.S.C. 

4321, et reg.) because it is not a major 

federal action significantly affecting the 

quality of the human environment. 

Federalism 

The Corporation has analyzed this 

proposed rule under the principles and 

criteria in Executive Order 13132, dated 

August 4, 1999, and has determined that 

this proposal does not have sufficient 

federalism implications to warrant a 

Federalism Assessment. 

Unfunded Mandates 

The Corporation has analyzed this 

proposed rule under Title II of the 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 

(Pub. L. 104–4, 109 Stat. 48) and 

determined that it does not impose 

unfunded mandates on State, local, and 

tribal governments and the private 

sector requiring a written statement of 

economic and regulatory alternatives. 

Paperwork Reduction Act 

This proposed regulation has been 

analyzed under the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 and does not 

contain new or modified information 

collection requirements subject to the 

Office of Management and Budget 

review. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 402 

Vessels, Waterways. 

Accordingly, the Saint Lawrence 

Seaway Development Corporation 

proposes to amend 33 CFR part 402, 

Tariff of Tolls, as follows: 

PART 402—TARIFF OF TOLLS 

■ 1. The authority citation for Part 402 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 983(a), 984(a)(4) and 

988, as amended; 49 CFR 1.52. 

■ 2. In § 402.3, add definitions of 

‘‘Gateway Incentive’’, ‘‘Toll reduction’’, 

and ‘‘Volume commitment’’ in 

alphabetical order to read as follows: 

§ 402.3 Interpretation. 

* * * * * 

Gateway Incentive means a percentage 

reduction, as part of an incentive 

program, negotiated and offered on 

applicable cargo tolls for shipments of a 

specific commodity diverted to the 

Seaway from a competing gateway. 

* * * * * 

Toll reduction means the negotiated 

percentage of refund on applicable cargo 

tolls under the Gateway Incentive 

program. 

* * * * * 

Volume commitment means the 

negotiated annual cargo tonnage, with a 

minimum of 250,000 metric tons per 

year, a shipper must reach for the 

negotiated toll reduction under the 

Gateway Incentive to become 

applicable. 

* * * * * 

■ 3. Revise paragraph (a) of § 402.4 to 

read as follows: 

§ 402.4 Tolls. 

(a) Every vessel entering, passing 

through or leaving the Seaway shall pay 

a toll that is the sum of each applicable 

charge in § 402.12. Each charge is 

calculated on the description set out in 

column 1 of § 402.12 and the rate set out 

in column 2 or 3. 

* * * * * 

■ 4 . Redesignate §§ 402.8, 402.9. 

402.10, 402.11, 402.12 and 402.13 as 

402.9, 402.10, 402.11, 402.12, 402.13 

and 402.14 respectively. 

■ 5. Add a new § 402.8 to read as 

follows: 

§ 402.8 Gateway Incentive. 

(a) To be eligible for the Gateway 

Incentive, cargoes, must presently be 

moving between a specific origin and 

destination via other competing 

gateways. 

(b) To be eligible for the refund 

applicable under the Gateway Incentive 

program, a shipper, or its representative, 

must: 

(1) Submit an application to the 

Manager for the proposed movement 

(cargo/origin/destination) to be 

approved under the rules of the 

Gateway Incentive program; 

(2) Supply to the Manager the 

information proving that the proposed 

movement is currently done via a 

competing gateway; 

(3) Negotiate with the Manager the 

terms of the proposal, that is an 

applicable toll reduction, a volume 

commitment, and the duration of the 

proposal. 

(c) The shipper, or its representative, 

will qualify annually for the negotiated 

toll reduction upon completion of the 

annual volume commitment during the 

agreed upon duration period. 

(d) The Gateway Incentive applies 

only to movements of qualified cargoes 

done after the commencement date of 

the qualified Gateway Incentive. 

Movements done prior to the date of 

commencement of the Gateway 

Incentive will be ineligible for the 

rebate. 

(e) The shipper, or its representative, 

will provide the Manager with a request 

for the Gateway Incentive refund, 

together with copies of any documents 

required to support the request, within 

sixty (60 days) of the close of the 

navigation season. Requests for refunds 

should be submitted to the Manager, 

Revenue and Forecast, who will be 

responsible for reviewing all documents 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

6812 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 9, 2016 / Proposed Rules 

and data and recommending the refund 

under the Gateway Incentive. 

(f) The negotiated Gateway Incentive 

percentage of tolls reduction paid in 

respect of qualifying cargo shipped will 

be refunded by the Manager after the 

close of the navigation season, once the 

Manager has confirmed through the 

review of submitted support documents 

that the shipper has met the volume 

commitment. The SLSMC reserves the 

right to require the ultimate origin and 

destination of cargoes to validate the 

commitment. 

■ 6. Revise paragraph (a) of the 

redesignated § 402.10 to read as follows: 

§ 402.10 Post-clearance date operational 

surcharges. 

(a) Subject to paragraph (b) of this 

section, a vessel that reports for its final 

transit of the Seaway from a place set 

out in column 1 of § 402.12 within a 

period after the clearance date 

established by the Manager and the 

Corporation set out in column 2 of 

§ 402.12 shall pay operational 

surcharges in the amount set out in 

column 3 of § 402.12, prorated on a perlock basis. 

* * * * * 

■ 7. Revise redesignated § 402.12 to read 

as follows: 

§ 402.12 Schedule of tolls. 

Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 

Item Description of charges 

Rate ($) Montreal to or from 

Lake Ontario 

(5 locks) 

Rate ($) Welland Canal—Lake 

Ontario to or from Lake Erie 

(8 locks) 

1 ................... Subject to item 3, for complete transit of the Seaway, a composite toll, comprising: 

(1) a charge per gross registered ton of the ship, applicable whether the ship is wholly or partially laden, or is in 

ballast, and the gross registered tonnage being calculated according to prescribed rules for measurement 

or under the International Convention on Tonnage 

Measurement of Ships, 1969, as amended from time 

to time1.

0.1061 ..................................... 0.1698. 

(2) a charge per metric ton of cargo as certified on the 

ship’s manifest or other document, as follows: 

(a) bulk cargo .............................................................. 1.0997 ..................................... 0.7506. 

(b) general cargo ........................................................ 2.6498 ..................................... 1.2013. 

(c) steel slab ............................................................... 2.3981 ..................................... 0.8600. 

(d) containerized cargo ............................................... 1.0997 ..................................... 0.7506. 

(e) government aid cargo ........................................... n/a ........................................... n/a. 

(f) grain ....................................................................... 0.6756 ..................................... 0.7506. 

(g) coal ........................................................................ 0.6756 ..................................... 0.7506. 

(3) a charge per passenger per lock ........................................ 1.6476 ..................................... 1.6476. 

(4) a lockage charge per Gross Registered Ton of the vessel, 

as defined in tem 1(1), applicable whether the ship is wholly or partially laden, or is in ballast, for transit of the Welland Canal in either direction by cargo ships, 

n/a ........................................... 0.2827. 

Up to a maximum charge per vessel ........................................ n/a ........................................... 3,955. 

2 ................... Subject to item 3, for partial transit of the Seaway .................. 20 per cent per lock of the applicable charge under items 

1(1), 1(2) and 1(4) plus the 

applicable charge under 

items 1(3).

13 per cent per lock of the applicable charge under items 

1(1), 1(2) and 1(4) plus the 

applicable charge under 

items 1(3). 

3 ................... Minimum charge per vessel per lock transited for full or partial transit of the Seaway.

2 27.46 ..................................... 27.46. 

4 ................... A charge per pleasure craft per lock transited for full or partial 

transit of the Seaway, including applicable federal taxes 3.

4 30.00 ..................................... 30.00. 

5 ................... Under the New Business Initiative Program, for cargo accepted as New Business, a percentage rebate on the applicable cargo charges for the approved period.20% ......................................... 20%. 

6 ................... Under the Volume Rebate Incentive program, a retroactive 

percentage rebate on cargo tolls on the incremental volume 

calculated based on the pre-approved maximum volume.

10% ......................................... 10%. 

7 ................... Under the New Service Incentive Program, for New Business 

cargo moving under an approved new service, an additional percentage refund on applicable cargo tolls above 

the New Business rebate.

20% ......................................... 20%. 

1Or under the US GRT for vessels prescribed prior to 2002. 

2The applicable charged under item 3 at the Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation’s locks (Eisenhower, Snell) will be collected in 

U.S. dollars. The collection of the U.S. portion of tolls for commercial vessels is waived by law (33 U.S.C. 988a(a)). The other charges are in Canadian dollars and are for the Canadian share of tolls. 3 $5.00 discount per lock applicable on ticket purchased for Canadian locks via paypal. 

4The applicable charge at the Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation’s locks (Eisenhower, Snell) for pleasure craft is $30 U.S. or 

$30 Canadian per lock. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 9, 2016 / Proposed Rules 6813 

Issued at Washington, DC, on February 1, 

2016. 

Saint Lawrence Seaway Development 

Corporation. 

Carrie Lavigne, 

Chief Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 2016–02169 Filed 2–8–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–61–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Parts 7 and 9 

[EPA–HQ–OA–2013–0031; FRL–9941–58– 

OA] 

RIN 2090–AA39 

Nondiscrimination in Programs or 

Activities Receiving Federal 

Assistance From the Environmental 

Protection Agency; Comment 

Extension 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of 

comment period. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is extending the comment 

period for the proposed rule titled 

‘‘Nondiscrimination in Programs or 

Activities Receiving Federal Assistance 

from the Environmental Protection 

Agency’’ that was published in the 

Federal Register on December 14, 2015. 

This action extends the deadline for 

submitting written comments on the 

proposed rule. This extension provides 

an additional 30 days for the public to 

provide written comments. 

DATES: Comments, identified by docket 

identification (ID) number EPA–HQ– 

OA–2013–0031, must be received on or 

before March 12, 2016. 

ADDRESSES: Written comments may be 

submitted online through Docket ID No. 

EPA–HQ–OA–2013–0031, to the Federal 

eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov or mailed to U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Office of Civil Rights, (Mail Code 

1201A), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., 

Washington, DC 20460. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeryl 

Covington or Lilian Dorka, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Office of Civil Rights, (Mail Code 

1201A), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., 

Washington, DC. 20460, telephone (202) 

564–7272 or (202) 564–7713. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

document extends the public comment 

period for the proposed 

Nondiscrimination in Programs or 

Activities Receiving Federal Assistance 

from the EPA (80 FR 77284, December 

14, 2015) in order to ensure that the 

public has sufficient time to review and 

comment on the proposal. That proposal 

provided for a public comment period 

ending February 12, 2016. 

The EPA received several requests 

from the public to extend this comment 

period and this notice is the Agency’s 

response to those persons who 

requested an extension of the comment 

period. In addition, EPA is providing 

notice that additional support 

documents are available for public 

inspection in the rulemaking docket. 

Finally, in response to significant public 

interest in the proposed rule, the 

Agency will conduct one additional 

public session in Washington, DC. 

Additional information on this 

announcement is located at 

www.epa.gov/ocr. 

Dated: February 1, 2016. 

Velveta Golightly-Howell, 

Director, Office of Civil Rights. 

[FR Doc. 2016–02589 Filed 2–8–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R09–OAR–2015–0756; FRL–9941–10– 

Region 9] 

Approval of California Air Plan 

Revisions, Yolo-Solano Air Quality 

Management District 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve 

revisions to the Yolo-Solano Air Quality 

Management District (YSAQMD) 

portion of the California State 

Implementation Plan (SIP). These 

revisions concern volatile organic 

compound (VOC) and oxides of nitrogen 

(NOx) emissions from gasoline 

dispensing facilities and stationary gas 

turbines. We are proposing to approve 

local rules to regulate these emission 

sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA 

or the Act). 

DATES: Any comments on this proposal 

must arrive by March 10, 2016. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R09– 

OAR–2015–0756 at http://

www.regulations.gov, or via email to 

Steckel.Andrew@epa.gov. For comments 

submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the 

online instructions for submitting 

comments. Once submitted, comments 

cannot be edited or removed from 

Regulations.gov. For either manner of 

submission, the EPA may publish any 

comment received to its public docket. 

Do not submit electronically any 

information you consider to be 

Confidential Business Information (CBI) 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Multimedia 

submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be 

accompanied by a written comment. 

The written comment is considered the 

official comment and should include 

discussion of all points you wish to 

make. The EPA will generally not 

consider comments or comment 

contents located outside of the primary 

submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or 

other file sharing system). For 

additional submission methods, please 

contact the person identified in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. 

For the full EPA public comment policy, 

information about CBI or multimedia 

submissions, and general guidance on 

making effective comments, please visit 

http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/

commenting-epa-dockets. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’ 

and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA. This 

proposal addresses local rules 2.22 and 

2.34. In the Rules and Regulations 

section of this Federal Register, we are 

approving these local rules in a direct 

final action without prior proposal 

because we believe these SIP revisions 

are not controversial. If we receive 

adverse comments, however, we will 

publish a timely withdrawal of the 

direct final rule and address the 

comments in subsequent action based 

on this proposed rule. Please note that 

if we receive adverse comment on a 

particular rule, we may adopt as final 

those rules that are not the subject of an 

adverse comment. 

We do not plan to open a second 

comment period, so anyone interested 

in commenting should do so at this 

time. If we do not receive adverse 

comments, no further activity is 

planned. For further information, please 

see the direct final action. 

Dated: December 24, 2015. 

Alexis Strauss, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX. 

[FR Doc. 2016–02422 Filed 2–8–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS