alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 49 (Tuesday, March 14, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 13735]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6219]



[[Page 13735]]

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Importer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated January 17, 1995, and published in the Federal 
Register on January 25, 1995, (60 FR 4925), Knight Seed Company, Inc., 
151 W. 126th Street, Burnsville, Minnesota 55337, made application to 
the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as an 
importer of Marihuana (7360), a basic class of controlled substance 
listed in Schedule I.
    No comments or objections have been received. Therefore, pursuant 
to Section 1008(a) of the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act 
and in accordance with Title 21, Code of Federal Regulations, Section 
1311.42, the above firm is granted registration as an importer of the 
basic class of controlled substance listed above.

    Dated: March 8, 1995.
Gene R. Haislip,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 95-6219 Filed 3-13-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 53 (Monday, March 20, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 14777]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6755]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Minerals Management Service


Notice on Outer Continental Shelf Gas and Oil Lease Sales

AGENCY: Minerals Management Service, Interior.

ACTION: List of restricted joint bidders.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the authority vested in the Director of the 
Minerals Management Service by the joint bidding provisions of 30 CFR 
256.41, each entity within one of the following groups shall be 
restricted from bidding with any entity in any other of the following 
groups at Outer Continental Shelf oil and gas lease sales to be held 
during the bidding period from May 1, 1995, through October 31, 1995. 
The List of Restricted Joint Bidders published October 5, 1994, in the 
Federal Register at 59 FR 50767 covered the period of November 1, 1994, 
through April 30, 1995.
    Group I. Exxon Corporation; Exxon San Joaquin Production Co.
    Group II. Shell Oil Co.; Shell Offshore Inc.; Shell Western E&P 
Inc.; Shell Frontier Oil & Gas Inc.; Shell Onshore Ventures Inc.
    Group III. Mobil Oil Corp.; Mobil Oil Exploration and Producing 
Southeast Inc.; Mobil Producing Texas and New Mexico Inc.; Mobil 
Exploration and Producing North America Inc.
    Group IV. BP America Inc.; The Standard Oil Co.; BP Exploration & 
Oil Inc.; BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc.

    Dated: March 13, 1995.
Cynthia Quarterman,
Acting Director, Minerals Management Service.
[FR Doc. 95-6755 Filed 3-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MR-M
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consentof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements on Form S-8 (No.’s 33-45092, 33-47604, 33-85512,333-2894, 333-2896, 333-51577, 333-82965, 333-39124, 333-61660, 333-108050,333-115187, 333-121496, 333-126513, 333-134528, and 333-145202) and Form S-3(No.’s 33-83602, 333-2898, 333-14143, 333-15295, 333-58831, 333-59639,333-87033, 333-33340, 333-61144, 333-75066, 333-101278, 333-108008, 333-111086,333-115509, 333-127949, 333-127950, 333-132730, 333-136860, and 333-145200), ofour reports dated February 22, 2008, with respect to the consolidatedfinancial statements and schedule of Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of AmylinPharmaceuticals, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) forthe year ended December 31, 2007.

 

 
|                   | /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP |
|------------------------|--------------------------------|
|                   |
| San Diego, California  |
| February 22, 2008 |

 

----
3XEOLF9HUVLRQRI%&,

3803,03(//(5&$67,1*35(6685(&217$,1,1*&%521=(



3,$==$52%(57

35,&(3803&203$1<

2WKHU

12

3XEOLF9HUVLRQRI%&,


<(6

12

 .*

 .*

,03257,1*7+,63$57)520&+,1$&2676

385&+$6,1*5$:0$7(5,$/$1'0$&+,1,1*,7'20(67,&$//<&267
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000882343
<NAME> 90BC
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          76,330
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   83,807
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               160,137
<PP&E>                                       9,600,469
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,703,198
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,057,408
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,740
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,034,668
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,057,408
<SALES>                                        764,787
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               773,393
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,147,349
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (373,956)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (373,956)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (373,956)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (31.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 12.1
 
 Sept. 24,
    
    
    Sept. 30,
    
    
    Sept. 28,
    
    
    Sept. 27,
    
    
    Sept. 26,2006(1)
    
    
    2007(1)
    
    
    2008(1)
    
    
    2009(1)
    
    
    2010(1)Consolidated Cash Flow:Net income
    
    $
    26,066
    
    
    $
    49,395
    
    
    $
    40,630
    
    
    $
    34,769
    
    
    $
    24,584Income taxes
    
    
    17,945
    
    
    
    33,279
    
    
    
    26,000
    
    
    
    19,481
    
    
    
    16,587Interest expense
    
    
    57,238
    
    
    
    59,586
    
    
    
    57,464
    
    
    
    68,252
    
    
    
    68,516Interest expense related to debt purchase
    
    
    
    
    
    
    3,953
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Amortization of capitalized interest
    
    
    219
    
    
    
    226
    
    
    
    469
    
    
    
    849
    
    
    
    843Depreciation and amortization
    
    
    58,570
    
    
    
    60,395
    
    
    
    66,690
    
    
    
    68,179
    
    
    
    62,090Deferred benefits
    
    
    8,569
    
    
    
    14,468
    
    
    
    12,112
    
    
    
    11,023
    
    
    
    7,910Consolidated cash flow
    
    $
    168,607
    
    
    $
    221,302
    
    
    $
    203,365
    
    
    $
    202,553
    
    
    $
    180,530Fixed charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    57,238
    
    
    $
    59,586
    
    
    $
    57,464
    
    
    $
    68,252
    
    
    $
    68,516Interest expense related to debt purchase
    
    
    
    
    
    
    3,953
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Interest Capitalized
    
    
    4,276
    
    
    
    9,806
    
    
    
    11,261
    
    
    
    522
    
    
    
    16Fixed Charges
    
    $
    61,514
    
    
    $
    73,345
    
    
    $
    68,725
    
    
    $
    68,774
    
    
    $
    68,532Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio
    
    
    2.74
    
    
    
    3.02
    
    
    
    2.96
    
    
    
    2.95
    
    
    
    2.63
 
 (1)
    
    Consolidated Cash Flow, Fixed Charges and Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio are defined by the Indentures
governing our Senior Notes. We are providing the calculations as it may be of interest to our Bond Holders
and other interested parties.(2)
    
    Fiscal years 2006, 2008, 2009 and 2010 are 52-week years while fiscal 2007 is a 53-week year.
Unassociated Document


EXHIBIT 4.7







ASSIGNMENT OF BL-1040 PROJECT







THIS ASSIGNMENT (the "Assignment") is made effective as of January 1, 2009, by and between BioLine Innovations Jerusalem, Limited Partnership ("Assignor") and BioLineRx, Ltd. ("Assignee").







WHEREAS, Assignor entered into that certain License Agreement dated as of January 10, 2005 with B.G. Negev Technologies and Applications, Ltd. (the "License Agreement'); and







WHEREAS, Assignor desires to assign the License Agreement to Assignee pursuant to Section 14.10 thereof, and Assignee desires to accept such assignment;







NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:







1. Assignor hereby assigns the License Agreement, and all of Assignor's rights, obligations and interests thereunder to Assignee.







2. Assignee hereby accepts the foregoing assignment and agrees to be bound by the terms of the License Agreement.







3. This Assignment shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of  Israel.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Assignment to be duly executed as of the date first above written.










	
ASSIGNOR

	  	
ASSIGNEE


	  	  	  
	
BioLine Innovations Jerusalem, LP

	  	
BioLineRx, Ltd.


	
By It s General Partner

	  	  
	
BioLine Innovations Jerusalem, Ltd.

	  	  
	  	  	  
	
  /s/ Yuri Shoshan            

	  	

  /s/ Yuri Shoshan            




	
Date:  21.4.09

	  	
Date:  21.4.09
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Alfred Arroyo, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Livingston Wingate, J.), rendered September 18, 1985, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and sentencing him, as a predicate felon, to a prison term of from 4 *Vi*to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

On September 10, 1983, from the third story of a building, Detective Morrill surveyed the street through binoculars for drug transactions. He observed defendant and his codefendant give a glassine envelope to another person in exchange for money. Soon thereafter, the three men were apprehended by a backup team. Defendant’s cheekbone was fractured as a result of being struck in the face by his arresting officer. The prosecution presented evidence that the officer struck defendant because he was resisting arrest. Defendant alleged that he had not sold drugs, that he was grabbed from behind by a person that he did not know was a police officer, and that the officer’s attack was unprovoked. Defendant filed a complaint against the arresting officer which was investigated by the Police Department Internal Affairs Division. Defendant’s defense was that the police officers framed him because they learned about his complaint.

The court admitted defendant’s evidence that the arresting officer knew about the Internal Affairs investigation merely to show the officer’s bias and hostility toward defendant and not for its truth. The court forbade the prosecutor from introduc*360ing the result of that investigation to rebut defendant’s evidence, deciding that the fact of the investigation and not the result was relevant to the officer’s state of mind. However, on redirect examination, the prosecutor asked the officer whether he had learned that Internal Affairs had determined that defendant’s police brutality charges were unfounded. Upon counsel’s objection, the court emphatically told the jury to disregard the prosecutor’s statement. The court denied counsel’s request for a mistrial. The court also denied counsel’s request to introduce evidence that the Internal Affairs Division investigation was not thorough.

On appeal, defendant contends that he was denied a fair trial since the testimony that Internal Affairs had found defendant’s complaint unfounded was inadmissible and prejudiced the jury against defendant in its assessment of credibility. Although the admission of the testimony was erroneous *(People v Morris,*39 AD2d 750, 751), a mistrial was not warranted since the court sufficiently dispelled the prejudicial effect of the prosecutor’s error by instructing the jury to disregard the testimony *(People v Hernandez,*139 AD2d 472, 476).

Furthermore, notwithstanding defendant’s assertions of error in the charge, the court’s charge as a whole was proper since it adequately conveyed the concepts of accomplice liability and the prosecutor’s burden of proof *(see, e.g., People v Flecha,*161 AD2d 116). Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach and Smith, JJ.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2576

Speck Pumps-Pool Products, Inc: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions.

pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2668

Reelcraft Industries:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-15-00771-CR

John David GARCIA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Wilson County, Texas

Trial Court No. 11-05-075-CRW

Honorable Russell Wilson, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED February 1, 2017.

_____________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 (a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
 c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants fourth fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Jack H. Brown
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4095 

To require the Securities and Exchange Commission to require reporting 

of sourcing and due diligence activities of companies involving supply 

chains of products that are imported into the United States that are 

directly linked to products utilizing forced labor from Xinjiang, China, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 27, 2022 

Mr. SCOTT of Florida (for himself, Mr. RUBIO, and Mr. BRAUN) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To require the Securities and Exchange Commission to require reporting of sourcing and due diligence activities 

of companies involving supply chains of products that 

are imported into the United States that are directly 

linked to products utilizing forced labor from Xinjiang, 

China, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Transaction and 

5 Sourcing Knowledge Act’’ or the ‘‘TASK Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4095 IS

1 SEC. 2. SEC REPORTING. 

2 The Securities and Exchange Commission, as part of 

3 its evaluation of potential guidance on reporting on envi4 ronmental, social, and governance matters by publicly 

5 traded companies, shall require reporting of— 

6 (1) sourcing and due diligence activities of such 

7 companies involving supply chains of products that 

8 are imported into the United States that are directly 

9 linked to products utilizing forced labor from 

10 Xinjiang, China; 

11 (2) transactions with companies that have 

12 been— 

13 (A) placed on the Entity List by the De14 partment of Commerce; or 

15 (B) designated by the Department of the 

16 Treasury as Chinese Military-Industrial Com17 plex Companies; and 

18 (3) with respect to publicly traded United 

19 States companies with facilities in China, on an an20 nual basis— 

21 (A) whether there is a Chinese Communist 

22 Party committee in the operations of the com23 pany; and 

24 (B) a summary of the actions and cor25 porate decisions in which any committee deVerDate Sep 11 2014 05:18 Apr 28, 2022 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S4095.IS S4095

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4095 IS

1 scribed in subparagraph (A) may have partici2 pated. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3128

Sowa Tool & Machine Co. Ltd:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
----

|   | 1. | I      have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-Q of MIPS Technologies, Inc.      (this "Amendment"); and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | Based      on my knowledge, this Amendment does not contain any untrue      statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to      make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such      statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by      this Amendment. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                    |   |                                                                                                                                            |
|-------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:      May 13, 2009 | By:    | /s/ MAURY      AUSTIN    Maury      AustinVice President and Chief      Financial Officer,MIPS Technologies,      Inc. |

----