10488 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 38 / Monday, February 27, 1995 / Rules and Regulations

would result in a significant change

from the substance contained herein.

For this reason, and because a delay

would significantly affect the

certification of the airplane, which is

imminent, the FAA has determined that

prior public notice and comment are

unnecessary and impracticable, and

good cause exists for adopting these

special conditions immediately.

Therefore, these special conditions are

being made effective upon issuance. The

FAA is requesting comments to allow

interested persons to submit views that

may not have been submitted in

response to the prior opportunities for

comment described above.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25

Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting

and recordkeeping requirements.

The authority citation for these

special conditions is as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. app. 1344, 1348(c),

1352, 1354(a), 1355, 1421 through 1431,

1502, 1651(b)(2), 42 U.S.C. 1857f–10, 4321 et

seq.; E.O. 11514; and 49 U.S.C. 106(g).

The Special Conditions

Accordingly, pursuant to the

authority delegated to me by the

Administrator, the following special

conditions are issued as part of the

supplemental type certification basis for

the GAC Model G–IV airplane, as

modified by Duncan Aviation:

1. Protection from Unwanted Effects

of High-Intensity Radiated Fields

(HIRF). Each electrical and electronic

system that performs critical functions

must be designed and installed to

ensure that the operation and

operational capability of these systems

to perform critical functions are not

adversely affected when the airplane is

exposed to high intensity radiated fields

external to the airplane.

2. The following definition applies

with respect to this special condition:

Critical Function. Functions whose

failure would contribute to or cause a

failure condition that would prevent the

continued safe flight and landing of the

airplane.

Issued in Renton, Washington, on February

13, 1995.

Darrell M. Pederson,

Assistant Manager, Transport Airplane

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service,

ANM–101.

[FR Doc. 95–4773 Filed 2–24–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 94–AGL–31]

Modification of Class D Airspace;

Cleveland, OH

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: This action modifies Class D

airspace at Cleveland, Burke Lakefront,

OH by adjusting the lower vertical

limits of the Class D area up to but not

including the base altitude of the

overlying Class B airspace area.

Associated with airspace

reclassification, guidelines have been

established for depicting Class D

airspace areas that underlie Class B

airspace areas. The intent of this action

is to eliminate confusion to pilots by

appropriately identifying controlled

airspace areas at Cleveland, Burke

Lakefront, OH.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC, May 25,

1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Nancy Cibic, Air Traffic Division,

System Management Branch, AGL–530,

Federal Aviation Administration, 2300

East Devon Avenue, Des Plaines, Illinois

60018, telephone (708) 294–7573.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

On December 23, 1994, the FAA

proposed to amend part 71 of the

Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR

part 71) to modify the Class D airspace

area at Cleveland, Burke Lakefront, OH

(59 FR 246).

Airspace Reclassification, effective

September 16, 1993, discontinued the

use of the term ‘‘control zone’’ and

replaced it with the designation ‘‘Class

D’’ airspace. Subsequent to and

associated with airspace reclassification,

new guidelines have been established

for depicting Class D airspace areas that

underlie Class B airspace areas. The

base altitude of the higher class

airspace, in this case Class B airspace,

supersedes the vertical limits of the

Class D airspace area. Therefore, this

action adjusts the lower vertical limits

of the Class D area up to but not

including the base of the overlying Class

B airspace area. The intent of this action

is to eliminate confusion to pilots by

appropriately identifying the controlled

airspace areas at Cleveland, Burke

Lakefront Airport, OH. Interested parties

were invited to participate in this

rulemaking proceeding by submitting

written comments on the proposal to the

FAA. No comments objecting to the

proposal were received.

The coordinates for this airspace

docket are based on North American

Datum 83. Class D airspace designations

are published in Paragraph 5000 of FAA

Order 7400.9B dated July 18, 1994, and

effective September 16, 1994, which is

incorporated by reference in 14 CFR

71.1. The Class D airspace designation

listed in this document will be

published subsequently in the Order.

The Rule

This amendment to part 71 of the

Federal Aviation Regulations modifies

Class D airspace at Cleveland, Burke

Lakefront Airport, OH to coincide with

the guidelines for depicting Class D

airspace areas.

The FAA has determined that this

regulation only involves an established

body of technical regulations for which

frequent and routine amendments are

necessary to keep them operationally

current. It, therefore—(1) is not a

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under

Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a

‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44

FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)

does not warrant preparation of a

regulatory evaluation as the anticipated

impact is so minimal. Since this is a

routine matter that will only affect air

traffic procedures and air navigation, it

is certified that this rule will not have

a significant economic impact on a

substantial number of small entities

under the criteria of the Regulatory

Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

Airspace, Incorporation by reference,

Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

In consideration of the foregoing, the

Federal Aviation Administration

amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71—[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for 14 CFR

part 71 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. app. 1348(a), 1354(a),

1510; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–

1963 Comp., p. 389; 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 14 CFR

11.69.

§ 71.1 [Amended]

2. The incorporation by reference in

14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation

Administration Order 7400.9B, Airspace

Designations and Reporting Points,

dated July 18, 1994, and effective

September 16, 1994, is amended as

follows:

Paragraph 5000 General

* * * * *
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 38 / Monday, February 27, 1995 / Rules and Regulations 10489

AGL OH D Cleveland, Burke Lakefront

Airport, OH [Revised]

(Lat. 41°31′03′′N., Long. 81°41′00′′W.)

That airspace extending upward from the

surface to but not including 3000 feet MSL

within a 4.1-mile radius of Burke Lakefront

Airport, excluding that airspace within the

Cleveland, OH, Class B airspace area. This

Class D airspace area is effective during the

specific dates and times established in

advance by a Notice to Airmen. The effective

date and time will thereafter be continuously

published in the Airport/Facility Directory.

* * * * *

Issued in Des Plaines, Illinois on February

15, 1995.

Roger Wall,

Manager, Air Traffic Division.

[FR Doc. 95–4778 Filed 2–24–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Economic Analysis

15 CFR Part 806

[Docket No. 9050206037–5037–01]

RIN 0691–AA23

Direct Investment Surveys: Raising

Exemption Level for Quarterly Report

Form BE–577

AGENCY: Bureau of Economic Analysis,

Commerce.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: This final rule amends

regulations on direct investment surveys

to raise the exemption level for filing

quarterly Form BE–577, Direct

Transactions of U.S. Reporter With

Foreign Affiliate. The BE–577 is a

mandatory survey of U.S. direct

investment abroad conducted by the

Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA),

U.S. Department of Commerce. Under

this final rule, the exemption level for

the survey—the level below which

reports are not required—is raised from

$15 million to $20 million. This change

will reduce the number of respondents

that otherwise must report in the

survey.

EFFECTIVE DATE: This rule will be

effective March 29, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Betty L. Barker, Chief, International

Investment Division (BE–50), Bureau of

Economic Analysis, U.S. Department of

Commerce, Washington, DC 20230;

phone (202) 606–9800.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the

December 12, 1994 Federal Register, 59

FR 63941, BEA published a notice of

proposed rulemaking that would

increase the exemption level for filing

the BE–577, Direct Transactions of U.S.

Reporter With Foreign Affiliate. No

comments on the proposed rule itself

were received. (As noted below, one

comment on changes to the survey

forms that did not require rule changes

was received.) Thus, this final rule is

the same as the proposed rule.

The quarterly BE–577 is part of BEA’s

regular data collection program for U.S.

direct investment abroad. The survey is

mandatory and is conducted pursuant to

the International Investment and Trade

in Services Survey Act (Pub. L. 94–472,

90 Stat. 2059, 22 U.S.C. 3101–3108, as

amended).

The exemption level is set in terms of

the size of a U.S. company’s foreign

affiliates. Under this final rule, the

exemption level for the BE–577 survey

is raised from $15 million to $20

million. Thus, if an affiliate is owned 10

percent or more by the U.S. company

and has assets, sales, or net income

greater than $20 million (positive or

negative), it will have to be reported. If

the affiliate does not meet these criteria,

a report is not required. The last time

the exemption level was raised was May

1, 1986.

Raising the exemption level lowers

the number of reports that otherwise

must be filed, thus reducing the

reporting and processing burdens. The

changes in exemption level will be

implemented beginning with the reports

for the first quarter of 1995.

BEA has made changes to the BE–577

survey form in addition to the raising of

the exemption level. These changes,

however, did not require rule changes

and are not reflected in the final rule.

They are a result of changes made to the

related BE–10. Benchmark Survey of

U.S. Direct Investment Abroad—1994.

They include the combination of two

items that appeared on the 1994 BE–577

survey and the addition of other items

that are on the 1994 BE–10 but were not

on the 1994 BE–577. Added to the form

are items, to be completed annually, on

services transactions between U.S.

Reporters and their foreign affiliates by

type and an item, to be completed

quarterly by affiliates classified in

banking, on the U.S. Reporter’s share of

the affiliate’s provision for loan losses.

Also, changes in the survey instructions

are being made primarily for purposes

of clarification and to reflect the

combination or addition of items.

In response to the notice of proposed

rulemaking, one letter of comment was

received. It expressed concern that the

new items on services transactions

would impose additional burden by

requiring modification of information

systems and more time to complete the

survey forms. The new items must be

completed only annually, and the first

time they will need to be completed will

not be until the second quarter

following the end of affiliates’ fiscal

year 1995, which in most cases will be

mid-1996. This will give companies at

least a year to implement program

changes necessary to report this

information.

Executive Order 12612

This final rule does not contain

policies with Federalism implications

sufficient to warrant preparation of a

Federalism assessment under E.O.

12612.

Executive Order 12866

This final rule has been determined to

be not significant for purposes of E.O.

12866.

Paperwork Reduction Act

The collection of information required

in this final rule has been approved by

OMB (OMB No. 0608–0004).

The public reporting burden for this

collection of information is estimated to

be 1.15 hours per response (form). The

burden on the U.S. Reporter will vary

depending on the number of forms that

must be submitted in a given reporting

period; this ranges from 1 to 225 forms.

The estimated burden of 1.15 hours per

form includes the time for reviewing

instructions, searching existing data

sources, gathering and maintaining the

data needed, and completing and

reviewing the collection of information.

Comments from the public regarding the

burden estimate or any other aspect of

this collection of information should be

addressed to: Director, Bureau of

Economic Analysis (BE–1), U.S.

Department of Commerce, Washington,

DC 20230; and to the Office of

Management and Budget, Washington,

DC 20503, Attention: Desk Officer for

the Department of Commerce.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

The Assistant General Counsel for

Legislation and Regulation, Department

of Commerce, has certified to the Chief

Counsel for Advocacy, Small Business

Administration, under the provisions of

the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.

606(b)), that this final rule will not have

a significant economic impact on a

substantial number of small entities.

Because it raises the exemption level for

filing the survey, it will actually reduce

the reporting requirements of smaller

entities.

List of Subjects in 15 CFR Part 806

Balance of payments, Economic

statistics, Foreign investments in United

States, Penalties, Reporting and