alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-1505

Sales Driven LLC dba Raybend:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Next Generation Technology Holdings,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"). I, Carl Pahapill, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

May 20, 2003                                   BY:  /S/ CARL PAHAPILL
                                               ------------------------------
                                               NAME: CARL PAHAPILL
                                               TITLE: CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


                                       18
<PAGE>
#### ROBER M. NOBLE v. J. G. and L. W. PRITCHETT.

(Filed 14 June, 1933.)

Civil action, before *Moore., Special Judge,*at September Term, 1932, of ALAMANCE.

This action was instituted for the recovery of damages for personal injury. The jury answered the issue of negligence “No.” From judgment upon the verdict the plaintiff appealed.

*Cooper Sail and Carroll & Carroll for plaintiff.*

*John S. Thomas and Sapp & Sapp for defendant.*

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal *in forma pauperis.*There is no affidavit and no certificate of counsel in the record. Hence the Court is without jurisdiction and the appeal is dismissed. C. S., 649; *Pruitt v. Wood,*199 N. C., 788, 156 S. E., 126; *Powell v. Moore, ante,*654.

Appeal dismissed.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 19, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3126

Sowa Tool & Machine Co. Ltd:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
#### J. A. VINSON v. P. L. EVERETTE, Trading as A. & E. TRUCK LINE.

(Filed 19 March, 1941.)

Appeal by plaintiff from *NimocJcs, J.,*September Term, 1940, of Wayne.

No error.

This was an action to recover damages for personal injury growing-out of collision between the plaintiff’s automobile and the defendant’s truck, at a street crossing in Goldsboro. The defendant set up the defense of contributory negligence. Issues of negligence, contributory *863negligence and damages were submitted to tbe jury. Tbe jury answered tbe issue addressed to tbe defendant’s negligence in favor of plaintiff, but found that tbe plaintiff by bis own negligence contributed to bis injury. From judgment on tbe verdict in favor of defendant, tbe plaintiff appealed.

*J. Faison Thomson and Scott B. Berkeley for plaintiff, appellant.*

*Royall, Gosney & Smith and James Glenn for defendant, appellee.*

Peb Cubiam.

There being evidence to support tbe verdict of tbe jury in favor of tbe defendant on tbe issue of contributory negligence, tbe judgment dismissing tbe action must be upheld, unless there was error in tbe admission of evidence or in tbe charge of tbe court addressed to that issue. A careful examination of tbe record leads us to tbe conclusion that tbe exceptions to tbe admission of testimony and to tbe instructions given by tbe court to tbe jury are without substantial merit.

In tbe trial we find

No error.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 23, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-10464

New Couplings & Pups, LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request did not contain a sufficient product identification or was 

determined to be non-administrable.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2392

Primex Family of Companies:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that the imposition of additional duties on 

the particular product would cause severe economic harm to you or other U.S. interests.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
#### J. VERNON BLADES v. B. F. PICKLES, Trustee, et al.

(Filed 6 October, 1926.)

Appeal by defendants from *Nunn, J.,*at March Term, 1926, of *J*ONES.

Civil action to quiet title or remove cloud therefrom.

From a verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff, tbe defendants appeal, assigning error.

*No counsel appearing for plaintiff.*

*F. C. Brinson and Moore & Duwn for defendants.*

*813Per Curiam.

The appeal presents the single question as to whether the verdict is sufficient to support the judgment. It is found by the jury, in response to the seventh issue, that whatever rights the defendants may have had to the lands in question, they are now barred by the statute of limitations from asserting them. This issue alone disposes of the case and is sufficient to support the judgment. It was submitted without objection, and there is no exception challenging the correctness of the verdict.

No error.
<PAGE>


                                   EXHIBIT 11


                           DURA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
            STATEMENTS RE COMPUTATIONS OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              1999                1998                1997
NET INCOME PER SHARE - BASIC                             --------------      ---------------     --------------
<S>                                                      <C>                 <C>                 <C>
Net income                                               $   30,004,000      $     2,733,000     $  (84,692,000)
                                                         ==============      ===============     ==============
Weighted average number of common shares:
      Common stock                                           44,132,372           46,028,396         43,828,208
                                                         ==============      ===============     ==============
Net income per share                                     $         0.68      $          0.06        $     (1.93)

NET INCOME PER SHARE - DILUTED

Net income                                               $   30,004,000      $     2,733,000     $  (84,692,000)
                                                         ==============      ===============     ==============
Weighted average number of common and
   common equivalent shares assuming
   issuance of all dilutive contingent shares:
      Common stock                                           44,132,372           46,028,396         43,828,208
      Stock options                                             906,859              744,155                  -
      Warrants                                                  633,070            1,036,440                  -
                                                         --------------       --------------     --------------
         Total                                               45,672,301           47,808,991         43,828,208
                                                         ==============       ==============     ==============
Net income per share                                     $         0.66       $         0.06     $        (1.93)
                                                         ==============       ==============     ==============
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4221 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4221

  To amend title 5, United States Code, to achieve parity between the 
cost-of-living adjustment with respect to an annuity under the Federal 
  Employees Retirement System and an annuity under the Civil Service 
               Retirement System, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 16, 2022

Mr. Padilla (for himself, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Sanders, Mr. Van Hollen, and 
  Ms. Warren) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 5, United States Code, to achieve parity between the 
cost-of-living adjustment with respect to an annuity under the Federal 
  Employees Retirement System and an annuity under the Civil Service 
               Retirement System, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Equal COLA Act''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN COLA FOR FERS ANNUITIES.

    (a) In General.--Section 8462 of title 5, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) in paragraph (1), by adding ``and'' at the end;
                    (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ``; and'' and 
                inserting a period; and
                    (C) by striking paragraph (3); and
            (2) by amending subsection (b)(1) to read as follows:
    ``(b)(1) Except as provided in subsection (c), effective December 1 
of each year, each annuity payable from the Fund having a commencing 
date not later than such December 1 shall be increased by the percent 
change in the price index for the base quarter of such year over the 
price index for the base quarter of the preceding year in which an 
adjustment under this subsection was made, adjusted to the nearest \1/
10\ of 1 percent.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the date that is 90 days after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
    (c) Application.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall apply 
to--
            (1) any cost-of-living adjustment under section 8462 of 
        title 5, United States Code, made after the effective date 
        described in subsection (b); and
            (2) any annuity covered by section 8462 of title 5, United 
        States Code, commencing before, on, or after the effective date 
        described in subsection (b).
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 48 (Monday, March 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 13449]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6140]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs


Receipt of Petition for Federal Acknowledgment of Existence as an 
Indian Tribe

    This is published in the exercise of authority delegated by the 
Secretary of the Interior to the Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs by 
209 DM 8.
    Pursuant to 25 CFR 83.8(a) (formerly 25 CFR 54.8(a)) notice is 
hereby given that the Accohannock Indian Tribal Association, Inc., c/o 
Ann Buck MacKay, 427 Loblolly Lane, Salisbury, MD 21801-6851, has filed 
a petition for acknowledgment by the Secretary of the Interior that the 
group exists as an Indian tribe. The petition was received by the 
Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) on January 18, 1995, and was signed by 
members of the group's governing body.
    This is a notice of receipt of petition and does not constitute 
notice that the petition is under active consideration. Notice of 
active consideration will be sent by mail to the petitioner and other 
interested parties at the appropriate time.
    Under Section 83.8(d) (formerly 54.8(d)) of the Federal 
regulations, interested parties and informed parties may submit factual 
and/or legal arguments in support of or in opposition to the group's 
petition. Any information submitted will be made available on the same 
basis as other information in the BIA's files. Such submissions will be 
provided to the petitioner upon receipt by the BIA. The petitioner will 
be provided an opportunity to respond to such submissions prior to a 
final determination regarding the petitioner's status.
    The petition may be examined, by appointment, in the Department of 
the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Branch of Acknowledgment and 
Research, Room 1362-MIB, 1849 C Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20240, 
Phone: (202) 208-3592.

    Dated: February 23, 1995.
Ada E. Deer,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 95-6140 Filed 3-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-02-M
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

March 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2429

Braeburn Systems LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice published at 

83 FR 67463 (‘the exclusion notice’) and posted on the USTR website, at

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/2018-28277.pdf.

The scope of your exclusion is governed by the scope of the formal HTSUS product 

description in the Annex to the exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in 

any particular request for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted 

by excluding from the additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description 

contained in the Annex to the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

May 29, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-3180

FCA US LLC:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

“Made in China 2025” or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     1999 Textainer Equipment Income Fund IV
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000882288
<NAME>                        Textainer Income Fund IV, LP
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         2,660
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  5,521
<ALLOWANCES>                                   749
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               20
<PP&E>                                         114,506
<DEPRECIATION>                                 45,244
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 76,714
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,077
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     74,637
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   76,714
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               17,256
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  16,425
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               264
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                567
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   567
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>