alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

|                                                                                                                                                                                                     | Exhibit      32 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|  Certification      of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  |

| 1)     | The      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Operating Partnership for the period      ended September 30, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the      requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15      U.S.C. 78m); and |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
| 2)     | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Operating Partnership.                                                                           |

|   |    / S / Robert      J.      Attea                          Robert      J. AtteaChairman      of the BoardChief      Executive Officer of Sovran Holdings, Inc., the Sole General Partner of      the Operating Partnership |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |      / S / David      L.      Rogers                        David      L. RogersChief      Financial Officer of Sovran Holdings, Inc., the Sole General Partner of      the Operating Partnership                           |

----
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Payless ShoeSource, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending August 2, 3, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Steven J. Douglass, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/  Steven J. Douglass
-------------------------
Steven J. Douglass
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
September 12, 2003
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4092 

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to exempt certain employees 

engaged in outdoor recreational outfitting or guiding services from maximum hours requirements. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 27, 2022 

Mr. DAINES (for himself and Ms. SINEMA) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, 

Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to exempt 

certain employees engaged in outdoor recreational outfitting or guiding services from maximum hours requirements. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4092 IS

1 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN EM2 PLOYEES ENGAGED IN OUTDOOR REC3 REATIONAL OUTFITTING OR GUIDING SERV4 ICES. 

5 Section 13(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 

6 1938 (29 U.S.C. 213(b)) is amended by inserting after 

7 paragraph (3) the following: 

8 ‘‘(4) any employee principally engaged in out9 door recreational outfitting or guiding services and 

10 employed by an employer principally engaged in the 

11 business of providing such outfitting or guiding serv12 ices that— 

13 ‘‘(A) does not operate for more than seven 

14 months in any calendar year; or 

15 ‘‘(B) had average receipts for any six 

16 months of the preceding calendar year that 

were not more than 331 17 ⁄3 per centum of its av18 erage receipts for the other six months of such 

19 year; or’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4235 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4235

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the Controlled Substances Act to fix a technical error in the 
                              definitions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS TO THE CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES ACT.

     Section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802) is 
amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraph (58) as paragraph (59);
            (2) by redesignating the second paragraph designated as 
        paragraph (57) (relating to the definition of ``serious drug 
        felony'') as paragraph (58); and
            (3) by moving paragraphs (57), (58) (as so redesignated), 
        and (59) (as so redesignated) 2 ems to the left.

            Passed the Senate September 14, 2022.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
117th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 4235

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to fix a technical error in the 
                              definitions.
```
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3172

CW Bearing USA, Inc: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions.

pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
Exhibit 10.11


 


Termination of Tenancy Agreement


 


The landlord, Lao Wai Man, and the tenant, Galaxy Human Resources Limited,
both agreed to terminate the contract. The tenant will return the empty unit to the landlord on October 31, 2020, and the landlord will
return the entire deposit to the tenant on the same day, but the deposit must be deducted the arrears of rent and water, electricity,
gas, etc. (if there is any damage in the house, the repair cost will be deducted). Sincerely.


 





	Landlord’s Signature:	 	Tenant’s
Signature:






 


Deposit refund receipt


 


	Deposit	 	Water	 	Electricity	 	Outstanding	 	Rent Compensation	 	Others
	40,000	 	0	 	0	 	0	 	0	 	0



 


	Actual Received	 	
	TWD 40,000	 	Tenant’s Signature
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 48 (Monday, March 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13423-13424]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-6136]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
[CFDA No. 84.031A, CFDA No. 84.031G]


Extension of Closing Date for Receipt of Applications for 
Designation as an Eligible Institution for Fiscal Year (FY) 1995 for 
the Strengthening Institutions and Endowment Challenge Grant Programs

    The Department of Education published a notice in the Federal 
Register of February 6, 1995 (60 FR 7047) that established March 27, 
1995 as the closing date for submission of applications to be 
designated as an eligible institution under the Strengthening 
Institutions and [[Page 13424]] Endowment Challenge Grant programs for 
Fiscal Year 1995. The Department is reopening and extending the 
application period to April 3, 1995 because the requisite applications 
will not be available until March 1, 1995. FOR APPLICATIONS OR 
INFORMATION CONTACT: Strengthening Institutions Program Branch, 
Division of Institutional Development, U.S. Department of Education, 
600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Suite 600, Portals Building, Washington, 
D.C. 20202-5335. Telephone: (202) 708-8839. Individuals who use a 
telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal 
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 between 8 a.m. and 8 
p.m., Eastern time, Monday through Friday.
    Information about the Department's funding opportunities, including 
copies of application notices for discretionary grant competitions, can 
be viewed on the Department's electronic bulletin board (ED Board), 
telephone (202) 260-9950; or on the Internet Gopher Server at 
GOPHER.ED.GOV (under Announcements, Bulletins and Press Releases). 
However, the official application notice for a discretionary grant 
competition is the notice published in the Federal Register.

    Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1057, 1059c and 1065a.

    Dated: March 8, 1995.
David A. Longanecker,
Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education.
[FR Doc. 95-6136 Filed 3-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

February 19, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-3515

Curtis Instruments, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20.

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-11494

Wanhua Chemical US Operations, LLC: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
S. 4119 

One Hundred Seventeenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty two 

An Act 

To reauthorize the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘RECA Extension Act of 2022’’. 

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE RADIATION EXPOSURE COMPENSATION ACT. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3(d) of the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (Public Law 101–426; 42 U.S.C. 2210 note) is 

amended— 

(1) by striking the first sentence and inserting ‘‘The Fund 

shall terminate on the date that is 2 years after the date 

of enactment of the RECA Extension Act of 2022.’’; and 

(2) by striking ‘‘22-year period’’ and inserting ‘‘2-year 

period’’. 

(b) LIMITATION ON CLAIMS.—Section 8(a) of the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (Public Law 101–426; 42 U.S.C. 2210 note) 

is amended by striking ‘‘within 22 years after the date of the 

enactment of the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act Amendments of 2000’’ and inserting ‘‘not later than 2 years after the 

date of enactment of the RECA Extension Act of 2022’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

May 17, 2013

t0514

Order 

May 17, 2013

145340-2

CHERRYLAND ELECTRIC

COOPERATIVE,

Petitioner-Appellee,

v SC: 145340

COA: 296829

MTT: 00-296021

BLAIR TOWNSHIP,

Respondent-Appellant.

____________________________________/

CHERRYLAND ELECTRIC

COOPERATIVE,

Petitioner-Appellee,

v SC: 145341

COA: 296830

MTT: 00-296028

EAST BAY TOWNSHIP,

Respondent-Appellant.

____________________________________/

CHERRYLAND ELECTRIC

COOPERATIVE,

Petitioner-Appellee,

v SC: 145342

COA: 296856

MTT: 00-296026

GARFIELD TOWNSHIP,

Respondent-Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the stipulation signed by counsel for the parties 

agreeing to the dismissal of this appeal is considered, and the appeal is DISMISSED with 

prejudice and without costs.
Exhibit 31.1
**CERTIFICATIONS**
     I, Steven J. Douglass, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Payless ShoeSource, Inc., aDelaware corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)for the registrant and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information ; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: June 7, 2004           /s/    Steven J. Douglass    Steven J. Douglass    Chairman of the Board andChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RONALD E. DENNIS,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

BEN CURRY,

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 07-55443

D.C. No. CV-06-04031-ABC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Audrey B. Collins, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 19, 2010** 

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, TALLMAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Ronald E. Dennis appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have 

FILED

OCT 28 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 We certify for appeal, on our own motion, the issue of whether some 1

evidence of current dangerousness supported the California Board of Parole

Hearings’s 2004 decision to deny parole. See Hayward v. Marshall, 603 F.3d 546,

554-55 (9th Cir. 2010) (en banc). We decline to certify for appeal Dennis’s

remaining contentions. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (certificate of appealability

requires “substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right”).

2 07-55443

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm. 1

Dennis contends that the Board of Parole Hearings’s 2005 decision to deny

him parole violated his due process rights. Our review of the record indicates that

the state court did not unreasonably conclude that some evidence supports the

Board’s decision. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d); see also Hayward v. Marshall, 603

F.3d 546, 563 (9th Cir. 2010) (en banc). Dennis’s contention that the Board relied

only on the commitment offense in finding him unsuitable for parole is belied by

the record. The district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to hold an

evidentiary hearing. See Schriro v. Landrigan, 550 U.S. 465, 474 (2007).

 Dennis’s requests for appointment of counsel, judicial notice, and an

evidentiary hearing are denied. All pending motions are denied as moot.

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>   1












                                  EXHIBIT 21.1





<PAGE>   2




                        MARCUM NATURAL GAS SERVICES, INC.


                                  SUBSIDIARIES



         WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARIES OF MARCUM NATURAL GAS SERVICES, INC.:

                       Southern Flow Companies, Inc., a Delaware corporation
                       Metretek, Incorporated, a Florida corporation
                       Marcum Gas Transmission, Inc., a Colorado corporation
                       Marcum Denver, Inc., a Colorado corporation


         WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF MARCUM GAS TRANSMISSION, INC.:

                       Marcum Capital Resources, Inc., a Colorado corporation


         WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARIES OF METRETEK, INCORPORATED:

                       Metretek Europe Limited, a company organized and existing
                                under the laws of Great Britain
                       Sigma VI, Inc., a Florida corporation