alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Crop Production and Pest Control Research: West Lafayette, IN
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area West Lafayette, Indiana Crop Production and Pest Control Research Research





- Scofield, Steven - Steve
- Plant Diseases (303)

Research Project: **Location:
                            Crop Production and Pest Control Research** Project Number: 5020-21220-014-002-S
                        
                        Project Type: Non-Assistance Cooperative Agreement Start Date: Jul 1, 2022
                        
                        End Date: Jun 30, 2024 **Objective:**
                        
                        Introgress Barley Yellow Dwarf Virus (BYDV) tolerance and resistance genes into oat genetic backgrounds and develop DNA markers linked to these tolerance/resistance loci to facilitate oat breeding. **Approach:**
                        
                        This project will employ Genomic Selection (GS) and Genome-wide Association Studies (GWAS) to develop oat lines with enhanced resistance/tolerance to BYDV.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### JAMES ROSS MINTZ v. FRED KURFEES and FARM EQUIPMENT COMPANY OF ASHEVILLE, INC., a corporation.

(Filed 21 October, 1959.)

Appeal by defendants from *Sharp, S. J.,*May, 1959 Special Term, of Buncombe.

This is an action to recover for personal injuries and property damage suffered by plaintiff when the front of the automobile he-was driving collided with the rear of a truck-trailer combination of the corporate defendant.

The collision occurred 25 September 1958 at 5 p.m. on old U. S. Highway No. 19-23 in a rural area of Buncombe County. At the point of collision the highway runs generally east and west. The individual defendant, employee of the corporate defendant, parked and left unattended the truck-trailer on the highway so that only a width of about 13 feet of the hard surface was unobstructed. At the point of the collision the highway is 18 feet wide with narrow shoulders and high embankments on each side. The vehicle was parked about 75 feet west of the crest of a hill. A gray colored farm tractor was mounted on the trailer.

Plaintiff’s evidence in brief tends to show: He was driving west-wardly at about 45 to 50 miles per hour. As he came to the crest of the hill his vision was somewhat impaired by the sun. He then saw the parked vehicle and its position, slackened his speed to about 40 miles per hour, started to the left to go around the truck-trailer, then saw a car approaching from the west, pulled back to the right and applied his brakes but was unable to stop his car before colliding with the trailer. He left 48 feet of tire marks.

Defendants’ evidence in brief tends to show: The highway is straight for one mile to the east of the hill. There is a rise about two-*96tenths of a mile to the east of the point of collision from which the top of the tractor-trailer could have been seen. The top of the parked vehicle could have been seen 200 feet 'before reaching the crest of the hill.

Issues of negligence, contributory negligence and damages were submitted to the jury. The jury’s verdict was favorable to plaintiff on all issues.

From judgment conformable to the verdict defendants appealed and assigned error.

*Williams & Williams for plaintiff, appellee.*

*Meekins, Packer & Roberts for defendants, appellants.*

PER Cueiam.'

Defendants make twenty-four assignments of error. Each of these has been carefully considered. The pleadings and the evidence adduced in support thereof make a case for the jury. The case was submitted to the jury upon instructions conforming to settled principles of law. The jury has resolved the issues in favor of the plaintiff. In the trial of the cause we find no prejudicial error.

No error.

HiggiNS, J., not sitting.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
RULE 13a-14(b) OR 15d-14(b) AND
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    the Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Exchange Act; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respect, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: February 11, 2008
    By:
    /s/ Stephen NagelPresident and Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 43 (Monday, March 6, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 12250]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5389]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION


Release of Waybill Data

    The Commission has received a request from Covington & Burling and 
Union Pacific Corporation (UP) for permission to use certain data from 
the 1993 I.C.C. Waybill Sample. A copy of the request (WB468-2/23/95) 
may be obtained from the I.C.C. Office of Economic and Environmental 
Analysis.
    The waybill sample contains confidential railroad and shipper data; 
therefore, if any parties object to this request, they should file 
their objections with the Director of the Commission's Office of 
Economic and Environmental Analysis within 14 calendar days of the date 
of this notice. The rules for release of waybill data are codified at 
49 CFR 1244.8.
    Contact: James A. Nash, (202) 927-6196.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-5389 Filed 3-3-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7035-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the quarterly report of Golden State Vintners, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, John G. Kelleher, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbannes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|/s/JOHN G. KELLEHERJohn G. Kelleher
Chief Financial Officer
February 17, 2004 |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|                                                                              |  | 

---

QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 47 (Friday, March 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 13157]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5942]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION

Information Collection Submitted to OMB for Review

AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

ACTION: Notice of information collection submitted to OMB for review 
and approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1980 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the FDIC hereby gives notice that it 
has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget a request for OMB 
review of the information collection system described below.

    Type of Review: Extension of the expiration date of a currently 
approved collection without any change in the substance or method of 
collection.
    TItle: Unsafe and Unsound Practices--Extension of Credit to 
Executive Officers.
    Form Number: N/A.
    OMB Number: 3064-0108.
    Expiration Date of OMB Clearance: May 31, 1995.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Respondents: Executive officers of insured nonmember banks.
    Number of Respondents: 4,000.
    Annual Hours Per Recordkeeper: 2.0.
    Total Recordkeeping Hours: 8,000.
    OMB Reviewer: Milo Sunderhauf, (202) 395-7316, Office of Management 
and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (3064-0108), Washington, D.C. 
20503.
    FDIC Contact: Steven F. Hanft, (202) 898-3907, Office of the 
Executive Secretary, Room F-400, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 
550 17th Street N.W., Washington, D.C. 20429.
    Comments: Comments on this collection of information are welcome 
and should be submitted before April 10, 1995.

ADDRESSES: A copy of the submission may be obtained by calling or 
writing the FDIC contact listed above. Comments regarding the 
submission should be addressed to both the OMB reviewer and the FDIC 
contact listed above.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Executive officers of insured nonmember 
banks must file a report with their bank's Board of Directors within 
ten days of incurring any indebtedness to any other bank in an amount 
in excess of the amount the insured nonmember bank could lend to the 
officer.

    Dated: March 6, 1995.

    Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robeft E. Feldman,
Acting Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-5942 Filed 3-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-M
i i i i i i



### MEM ORA ND UM OP INION
No
. 04 -0 9- 00 25 5- CR Ba rbar a Estra da IS UNZA , Appellant
v . The STA TE of Texas, Appellee Fr om the 144th J udicial District Court, Be x ar County , Texas

Trial Court No. 2007-CR-10344A Honora ble Catherine T orre s-Stahl, J udg e Presiding PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Just ice Marialy n Ba rnar d, J ustice Deliver ed and F iled: J uly 1, 2009 DI SMI SSED Pursuant to a plea barg ain ag ree ment, a ppellant Ba

rbar a Estra da I sunza pled nolo contender e to the offe nse of f

org ery . Th e tr ia l court imp os e d sen te nc e a nd sig ne d a c e rt if ic a te sta tin g that th is “is a plea -bar g ain ca se, and the defe ndant has NO rig ht of appe al.” See T EX . R. A PP . P. 25.2(a)( 2). After appellant timely

filed a n o tice of a

ppeal, the c lerk sent c opies of the c ertification and notice04
- 09
- 00 25 5- CR

- 2- of appe al to this court. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 25.2(e). T h e cl er k ’s re cord, which includes the plea barg ain ag ree ment and the tria l court’s Rule 25.2(a )(2) cer tification, has been filed. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 25.2(d). The c lerk’s r ecor d establishes the punishment asses s ed b y t he cour t does not exceed the punishment recommende d by the prosecutor and ag ree d to by the def endant a nd that the trial cour

t denied permission to appea l. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 25.2(a)( 2). Afte r re viewing the cler k’s re cord, the trial court’ s cer

tification there fore appea rs to acc urat el y

ref lect that this is a plea ba

rg ain ca se and Rodrigue z does not have a r ight to appe al. Se e Dears v. Sta te , 154 S.W .3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding that court of a ppeals should re view cle rk’s re cord to deter mine whether

trial court’ s
cer tification is acc urate ). This court must dismiss an appeal “ if a c ert i fi cation that shows the defe ndant has the r ight of appea l has not been ma de par t of the re cord.” T EX . R. A PP . P. 25.2(d). On May 20, 2009, we g ave a

ppellant notice that the a

ppeal would be dismiss ed unless an amende d tri a l c o u r t c e r ti f ic a ti o n s h o w in g s h e h a s th e r ig h t to a p p e a l h a s b e e n ma d e p a r t of the appellate rec ord by

J une 19, 2009. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 2 5. 2( d) ; 37 .1 ; Da nie ls v . S tat e , 110 S.W .3d 174 (Tex. App.–San Antonio 2003, order) , dis p. on me rit

s , N o . 0 4
- 0 3
- 0 0 1 7 6
- CR , 2 0 0 3 WL 21508347 (Jul y

2, 2003, pet. re f’d) (no t d es i gn at ed for publication). An a mended c ertification showing appellant ha s the rig ht to appeal has not bee n filed. We there fore dismiss this appeal. T EX . R. A PP . P. 25.2(d).

PER C URI AM Do no t pu bli sh
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 9724]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-4272]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD

Notice of Agency Meeting
    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 10:20 a.m. on 
Wednesday, February 15, 1995, the members of the Merit Systems 
Protection Board met in closed session. The purpose of the meeting was 
to discuss concerns over the delegation of authorities to Board legal 
offices, and also to consider the composition of the Board's National 
Performance Review II process team.
    In calling the meeting, the Board determined that Board business 
required its consideration of the matters on less than seven days' 
notice to the public; that no earlier notice of the meeting was 
practicable; that the public interest did not require consideration of 
the matters in a meeting open to public observation; and that the 
matters could be considered in a closed meeting by authority of 
subsections (c)(2) and (9)(B) of the ``Government in the Sunshine Act'' 
(5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2) and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B)).
    The meeting was held in the Board's conference room at Board 
headquarters at 1120 Vermont Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20419.

    Dated: February 15, 1995.
Robert E. Taylor,
Clerk of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-4272 Filed 2-16-95; 11:37 am]
BILLING CODE 7400-01-M
#### MRS. LOUISE NEWELL v. J. G. NEWELL.

(Filed 17 February, 1932.)

Appeal and Error J c — Order continuing motion for alimony pendente lite to hearing held not subject to appellate interference.

An order continuing a wife’s motion for alimony *pendente Ute*to the hearing without prejudice to either party is held not to be subject to appellate interference.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Gowper, Special Judge,*at September Term, 1931, of MeckleNbueg.

Civil action for divorce *a mensa et thoro,*and for alimony *pendente lite.*0. S., 1666.

From an order continuing plaintiff’s motion for alimony to the hearing, without prejudice to either party, the plaintiff appeals, assigning errors.

*John Newitt for plaintiff.*

*J. F. Dewell-and George W. Wilson for defendant.*

Stacy, C. J.

Conceding, without deciding, that it was error to continue to the hearing plaintiff’s motion for alimony *pendente lile,*nevertheless, in the absence of a sufficient showing, which perhaps may yet be made, the refusal to allow the motion is not cause for appellate interference. Hen*nis v. Hennis,*180 N. C., 606, 105 S. E., 274; *Easely v. Easely,*173 N. C., 530, 92 S. E., 353.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 6 (Tuesday, January 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2615-2616]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-540]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50-254 and 50-265]


Iowa-Illinois Gas and Electric Company; Notice of Transfer of 
Control of License

    Notice is hereby given that the United States Nuclear Regulatory 
Commission (Commission) is considering approval under 10 CFR 50.80 of 
the transfer of control of 25 percent of Quad Cities Nuclear Power 
Station, Units 1 and 2, facility operating licenses from Iowa-Illinois 
Gas and Electric Company (Iowa-Illinois) to MidAmerican Energy Company 
(MidAmerican). Iowa-Illinois will transfer all of its interest in the 
licenses to MidAmerican which will become the surviving corporation and 
public utility upon consummation of the merger of Iowa-Illinois, 
Midwest Resources Inc. (Midwest Resources), Midwest Power Systems Inc. 
(Midwest Power), and MidAmerican. Midwest Resources, and Iowa 
corporation and an exempt holding company owns all outstanding common 
stock of Midwest Power. Midwest Power, an Iowa corporation, principally 
generates, transmits and distributes electric energy in Iowa and South 
Dakota. MidAmerican, an Iowa corporation which would be the surviving 
holder of 25 percent of Facility Operating Licenses DPR-29 and DPR-30, 
was formed by Iowa-Illinois and Midwest Resources to effectuate this 
merger and it presently owns no assets and is not engaged in any 
business. By letter dated November 21, 1994, Iowa-Illinois informed the 
Commission that the current holders of shares of Iowa-Illinois common 
stock and holders of shares of Midwest Resources common stock will 
[[Page 2616]] exchange their shares for shares of MidAmerican.
    Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.80 the Commission may approve the transfer of 
control of a license, after notice to interested persons, upon the 
Commission's determination that the holder of the license following the 
transfer of control is qualified to have the control of the license and 
the transfer of the control is otherwise consistent with applicable 
provisions of law, regulations and orders of the Commission. Iowa-
Illinois has requested consent under 10 CFR 50.80 for transfer of the 
licenses to reflect the effective change in control of such ownership 
interest in the Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2.
    For further details with respect to this action, see the November 
21, 1994, letter, which is available for public inspection at the 
Commission's Public Document Room, the Gelman Building, 2120 L Street, 
NW., Washington, DC, and at the local public document room located at 
the Dixon Public Library, 221 Hennepin Avenue, Dixon, Illinois 61021.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 4th day of January 1995.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Robert A. Capra,
Director, Project Directorate III-2, Division of Reactor Projects--III/
IV, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 95-540 Filed 1-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M
Imensions

5.3D

iw

=

=

— ~ m1 nl

He G

id 5

| = |

= t

nl ~ nl
o i
gee : ot
7 ONIN a
eat ra
kl cor

—

©

[.35]
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-1836

Northern Tool & Equipment:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Michael E. Boxer, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) of Mariner Health Care, Inc. (the "Company"),
certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, that:

(3)      the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended
         December 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
         of sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(4)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Date:       April 10, 2003

/s/ Michael E. Boxer
----------------------------------------
Michael E. Boxer
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial Officer)
3XEOLF9HUVLRQRI%&,

3803%5$&.(7&$67,1*35(6685(&217$,1,1*67$,1/(6667((/



3,$==$52%(57

35,&(3803&203$1<

2WKHU

12

3XEOLF9HUVLRQRI%&,
 .*

<(6

12

 

 .*

,03257,1*7+,63$57)520&+,1$&2676

385&+$6,1*5$:0$7(5,$/$1'0$&+,1,1*,7'20(67,&$//<&267