alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

September 17, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number USTR-2018-0025-1666

Titan Flow Control: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/%2434_Billion_Exclusions_Gr

anted_September.pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

July 3, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-10440

DMac Industries, Inc: 

I am pleased to notify you that the United States Trade Representative has determined to 

grant the above-referenced exclusion request submitted pursuant to the notice published at 83 FR 

32181 (‘July 11 notice’). The exclusion determination is set out in a formal notice which has 

been submitted to Office of the Federal Register for publication (‘the exclusion notice’). A prepublication version of the exclusion notice has been posted on the USTR website, at 

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/301Investigations/Notice_of_Product_Exclusions.

pdf. 

The scope of the exclusion is governed by the formal HTSUS language in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice, and not by the product descriptions set out in any particular request 

for exclusion. An exclusion in response to your request has been granted by excluding from the 

additional tariffs products covered by a specially drafted description contained in the annex to 

the product exclusion notice. 

In accordance with the July 11 notice, the exclusion applies as of the July 6, 2018 

effective date of the tariff action, and will extend for one year after the exclusion notice is 

published in the Federal Register. As stated in the exclusion notice, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will issue additional instructions on entry guidance and implementation

Sincerely,

Joseph Barloon

General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

November 13, 2018

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-1887

X-Rite, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request concerns a product strategically important or related to 

‘‘Made in China 2025’’ or other Chinese industrial programs.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Eric Dewayne Hill, Appellant

No. 06

- 12

- 00163

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 114th District Court of Smith County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 114

- 2229

- 09 ). Opinion delivered b y Chief Justice Morriss, Justice Carter and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the
judgment of the court below. Therefore, we modify the trial court’s judgment and withdrawal

order to provide Hill shall pay only $195.00 in court costs

. As modified, the judgment and

withdrawal order of the trial court is affirmed.
We note that the appellant, Eric Dewayne Hill, has adequately indicated his inability to
pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED APRIL 24, 2013 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas June 23, 2022 No. 04-21-00583-CV Merardo MACAL , Appellant
v. Aizar J. KARAM , Jr., Appellee From the County Court at Law, Starr County, Texas

Trial Court No. CC-21-73 Honorable Orlando Rodriguez, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R Appellant’s reply brief was originally due May 31, 2022. On May 20, 2022, appellant filed an unopposed motion requesting an additional extension of time to file the reply brief until June 30, 2022. After consideration, we GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant to file their reply brief by June 30, 2022.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 23rd day of June, 2022.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
Order entered July 5, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00747-CV

MORRIS MILLER, Appellant

V.

DESIGN MASTERPIECE LANDSCAPE, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law

Rockwall County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1-14-110

ORDER

Before the Court is Rockwall County District Clerk’s June 30, 2016 request for extension 

of time to file the clerk’s record. However, because the docketing statement reflects appellant 

requested findings of fact and conclusions of law, the record is not due until September 9, 2016. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.1(a). Accordingly, we DENY the extension request as premature.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20508

January 4, 2019

RE: Product Exclusion Request Number: USTR-2018-0025-2643

Datacolor, Inc:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the product exclusion request referenced 

above has been denied. As you are aware, USTR published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 

28710) on June 20, 2018, that announced the Trade Representative’s determination to impose an 

additional duty of 25 percent on certain products from China. On July 11, 2018, the Trade 

Representative published a Federal Register notice (83 FR 32181) which announced that a 

process had been established under which interested persons could request that products falling 

within a covered HTSUS subheading be excluded from the additional duties announced on June 

20. 

Your request was reviewed in accordance with the factors and procedures set forth in 

Section B(1) of the July 11 notice. Based on that review, and after careful consideration, your 

request was denied because the request failed to show that this particular product is available 

only from China.

Because USTR will grant exclusion requests on a product specific basis, you may still 

benefit from a product exclusion if a similar product is granted an exclusion. Products for which 

an exclusion has been granted will be periodically announced on the USTR website. Product 

exclusions will become legally effective once published in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Vaughn
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A2153. JAMES KURTZ v. THE STATE.

In 2005, a jury convicted James Kurtz of several sexual offenses. In 2007, we

affirmed the trial court’s denial of his motion for a new trial. Kurtz v. State, 287 Ga.

App. 823 (652 SE2d 858) (2007). Kurtz later filed a motion to vacate a void

judgment, which the trial court denied. He then filed a notice of appeal to this Court. 

We lack jurisdiction.

“[A] petition to vacate or modify a judgment of conviction is not an appropriate

remedy in a criminal case.” Harper v. State, 286 Ga. 216, 218 (1) (686 SE2d 786)

(2009). Any appeal from an order denying or dismissing such a motion must be

dismissed. See id. at 218 (2); Roberts v. State, 286 Ga. 532, 532 (690 SE2d 150)

(2010). A direct appeal may lie from an order denying a motion to vacate or correct

a void sentence, but only if the defendant raises a colorable claim that the sentence

is, in fact, void. See Harper, supra at 217 n.1; Burg v. State, 297 Ga. App. 118, 119

(676 SE2d 465) (2009). When a sentence is within the statutory range of punishment,

it is not void. Jones v. State, 278 Ga. 669, 670 (604 SE2d 483) (2004).

Kurtz does not argue that his sentence exceeded the legal limits; rather, he

claims that his counsel rendered various instances of ineffective assistance and that

several of his convictions and sentences violated his right be free from double

jeopardy. In none of these claims, however, does Kurtz raise a colorable argument

that he received a sentence above the statutory maximum. See id. Because Kurtz has

not raised a valid void-sentence claim, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of

jurisdiction.

August 03, 2015
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

08/03/2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934 FOR THE ANNUAL PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       1,416,511
<SECURITIES>                                 1,505,686
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,600,822
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,186,219
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          183,714
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,033,958
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,186,219
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               177,049
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               451,242
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,843,974)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,843,974)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,843,974)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (76.57)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (76.57)<F1>
<FN>
<F1>EPS IS NET LOSS PER $1,000 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP UNIT.
</FN>


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4254 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 491
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4254

                          [Report No. 117-150]

  To amend the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 to clarify a provision 
     relating to certain contents of registrations under that Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 May 18 (legislative day, May 17), 2022

   Mr. Grassley (for himself, Mr. Peters, Mr. Sasse, Mr. Durbin, Mr. 
   Cornyn, Ms. Hassan, Ms. Sinema, and Ms. Stabenow) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
               Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

                           September 20, 2022

               Reported by Mr. Peters, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 to clarify a provision 
     relating to certain contents of registrations under that Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Disclosing Foreign Influence in 
Lobbying Act''.

SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF CONTENTS OF REGISTRATION.

    Section 4(b) of the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 
1603(b)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (6), by striking ``and'' at the end; and
            (2) in paragraph (7), by striking ``the offense.'' and 
        inserting the following: ``the offense; and
            ``(8) notwithstanding paragraph (4), the name and address 
        of each government of a foreign country (including any agency 
        or subdivision of a foreign government, such as a regional or 
        municipal unit of government) and foreign political party, 
        other than the client, that participates in the direction, 
        planning, supervision, or control of any lobbying activities of 
        the registrant.''.
                                                       Calendar No. 491

117th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 4254

                          [Report No. 117-150]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

  To amend the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 to clarify a provision 
     relating to certain contents of registrations under that Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 20, 2022

                       Reported without amendment
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          28,813
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  189,546
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               224,801
<PP&E>                                      22,904,117
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,059,781)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,606,495
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,013,089
<BONDS>                                      3,413,998
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  18,179,408
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,606,495
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               794,134
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,099,576
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              59,820
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (365,262)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (365,262)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (365,262)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John E. Bourgoin, certify, to the best of my knowledge, that based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MIPS
Technologies, Inc. for the three months ended December 31, 2002 (the "Form 10-Q"), the Form 10-Q
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MIPS Technologies, Inc. for the three month period covered by the Form 10-Q.

|Date: February 12, 2003 |  | By: | /s/JOHN E. BOURGOINJohn E. Bourgoin
President and Chief Executive Officer,
MIPS Technologies, Inc.
|----------------------- |  | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I, Kevin C. Eichler, certify, to the best of my knowledge, that based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MIPS Technologies, Inc. for the
three months ended December 31, 2002 (the "Form 10-Q"), the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of MIPS Technologies, Inc. for the three month period covered by the Form 10-Q.

|Date: February 12, 2003 |  | By: | /s/KEVIN C. EICHLERKevin C. Eichler
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,
MIPS Technologies, Inc.
|----------------------- |  | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Livestock Nutrient Management Research: Bushland, TX
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    CPRL
                        CPRL Home
                                    Soil and Water Management Research UnitSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Bushland, Texas Conservation and Production Research Laboratory Livestock Nutrient Management Research Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications
- IACUC Minutes

Research Projects Subjects of Investigation at this LocationEach ARS research project has related subjects of investigation.  Listed below are the subjects of investigation currently conducted at this location.
Clicking on a subject of investigation will list the research projects within that  subject of investigation.Subjects of Investigation
                            Air
                                Beef cattle, live animal
                                Dairy cattle, live animal
                                Microorganisms, general/other
                                Soil


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov